Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout80-07 Sherando Towne, Lot 4 - Restaurant - Opequon - BackfileSITE PLAN TRACKING SHEET Date: / D © File opened O /0-L Reference Manual updated/number assigned /O o7 D-base updated �o Ion File given to Renee' to update Application Action Summary CLOSE OUT FILE: ,; Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy made for file ?�qo File stamped 'approved', 'denied' or "withdrawn � 1:7)u log' Reference Manual updated 34(W D-base updated 3� 5 File given to Renee' for final update to Application Action Summary G> `/ 3 44 4 �� / a \B,.\C...\TnrlirK shms`She Pbm TneUng wPd P,rvis.d CVV?7 ) SITE PLAN APPLICATION CIFIECILIST The checklist shown below specifies the information which is required to be submitted as part of the site plan application_ The Deparime:nt of Planning & Development will review the application to ensure that it is complete prior to accepting it. If any portion of the application is not complete, it will be returned to the applicant(s). (1) One (1) set of approved camment sheets are required from each relevant review agency prior to final approval of a site plan. It is recommended that applicants contact the Deparbment of Planning & Development to determine which review agencies' are relevant to their site plan application. A list of potentially relevant review agencies is shown below: Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Department of GIS (G(-,ographic Infom ation Services) Frederick County Sanitation Authority Frederick County Building lnspe: ti.ons Department Frederick County Department of Public WorLs Frederick County Fire Marshal Frederick County Health Department Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Virginia Department of Transportation (VDO'1) City of Wimchester Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Frederick County / WT Dhester AirportAuthority (2) One (1) copy of the Site Plan application form.. (3) Payment of the site plan review fee. `' (4) One (1) reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required). o DATE Iy z- I rJo. L' n j RECEIVED FROM , v a� o A ESS ,� o 05 N CV E °) o '� �j� (jU �c �� %�' c `n �1; . Y1�' DOLLARS S I 0 . LL Q 0 N a� N ❑ FOR RENT Q Cl FOR p Q N • • �QnQ- - IIII U ACCOUONT CASH jjfl''(I 4N/ U �+ t/'1 AMT. PAID `��� '� CHECK i .. . ..� ,��' U BALANCE DUE MONEY ORDER BY C:) 0...- .'0 Page 1 of 1 Candice Perkins From: Joanne M. Maidens [Joanne.Maidens@phra.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 12:25 PM To: Candice Perkins Candice, You would think I could spell. The site plan I need withdrawn is S__herando - Lot 4 Thanks Joanne M. Maidens Design Engineer Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 P 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 www.phra.com 3/21 /2008 0 Page 1 of l Candice Perkins From: Joanne M. Maidens [Joanne. Maidens@phra.com] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 12:22 PM To: Candice Perkins Subject: Sherandoah - Lot 4 Candice, Please withdraw our previous submission for Sherandoah - Lot 4. We have completely revised the layout to change it from a Resturant site to a Retail site and will be resubmitting the plans. Joanne Joanne M. Maidens Design Engineer Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 P 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 www.phra.com 3/21 /2008 r Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 December 27, 2007 Ms. Joanne Maidens Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Second Review Comments for Site Plan 480-07; Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 Property Identification Number (PIN): 86-A-102F Dear Joanne: Plaiuiing Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1. Parking Calculations. The parking spaces for this development need to be located on lot 4. It does not appear that Sherando Towne Centre lot 5 has adequate parking to accommodate the uses in the retail center in addition to providing the needed spaces for the restaurant. Sherando Towne Centre was approved with a total of 231 spaces and was approved with 29,640 square feet of retail floor area, 4,800 square feet of office floor area and 5,080 square feet of restaurant floor area. There are uses approved in the lot 5 building that have a higher parking ratio than what was originally approved on the site plan. A full accounting of the actual uses (existing and proposed) needs to be provided for lot 5 to determine if a shared parking agreement can be approved. 2. Signage. The site plan shows a monument style sign but the note states that the sign will be 35 feet in height and 100sf in size. A sign no more than 15 feet in height and 100sf should be provided. 3. Lighting. Revise the lighting detail on sheet 4 to eliminate the "drop" lens option. Also, indicate if any building mounted lighting is proposed. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Ms. Joanne Maidens Review Comments for SP 1180-07 December 27, 2007 After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. When the plan is ready for approval, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Freclerick County Inspections Department, Public Works Dej)ortinent (County Engineei), the Freclerick County Fire Marshal, the Freclerick County Sanitation Authority, and the Virginia Department of 'Transportation. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/bled cc: Sherando Towne Centre, LLC, PO Box 2715, Winchester, VA 22604 Attachment Patton Harris Rust & Associates • DEC 1 1 December 11, 2007 Ms. Lauren Krempa Frederick County Planning 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Sherando Town Center Lot 4 Dear Ms. Krempa, l u RA We have the following responses to your comments dated November 2, 2007. 1 l l 1. Project Summary. Provide the PIN for this property in the project summary section. Also, provide the drive -through length (required and provided) in this section. PIN and drive through length have been provided. 2. Setbacks. When providing the setbacks for the building, the shortest distance to a property line should be listed as the provided. In addition, the provided "side setback should be broken down into left and right side provided. Setback information has been revised. 3. Parking Calculations. This building appears to be a fast food restaurant which requires parking spaces at 1.4 per 100 square feet of building space. Provide the required parking accordingly. Panting calculations have been revised. 4. Signage. Show any proposed signage for this property. Proposed freestanding signs should be of monument style. Signage not shown on this plan will require a site plan revision in the future. Revise the signage note accordingly. Proposed sign location added to plan. 5. Driving Lanes. The arrows which indicate the driving directions should be edited as shown on the plans to adjust for the one-way area behind the drive - through. A "one-way" sign should be added as shown on the plans. Drive arrows have been adjusted per markup. 6. Dumpster. The proposed dumpster pad location does not appear functional for this site. It is located on a one way strip which prohibits truck from backing in, and the location on Warrior Drive and the pedestrian trail is undesirable. Consider moving the dumpster as shown on the plans. If the dumpster remains as is, additional landscaping along Warrior Drive will be necessary. Dumpster pad location has been adjusted to allow for additional landscaping between it and trail. 0 • Sidewalk. The proposed sidewalks do not appear to provide any pedestrian benefit for the site. To provide a safe walking area which keeps the flow of traffic in mind, provide a sidewalk around the perimeter as shown on the plans. No perimeter sidewalks to be provided with this site. Stop sign. Provide a stop bar for the newly proposed entrances and a stop at the end of the drive -through he. Stop bars and sign have been added to plan. 9. Lighting. Revise the lighting note to state that "all lighting is to be controlled to prevent offsite glare on/o rroriuug /»ohcr/re.r and Provide a detail of the actual lighting units *in addition to the provide light pole detail to ensure that glare will be deflected. Lighting note has been revised and light detail has been added to plan. 10. Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks at the entrances to the site. Crosswalks have been added. 11. Landscaping. On the landscaping plan, provide the landscaping calculations for the parlung lot and impervious area. The Leyland Cypress trees used for screening the dumpster pad should be a minimum of four feet tall at time of planting. Cypress is spelled wrong on the plan. Landscaping has been revised. 12. Legal References. Provide the deed book and page number for all existing easements and rights -of -way. Provide a speed limit for Warrior Drive. Instrument nurnnbers have been added for all existing easements and Warrior Drive. Speed limit has been added. 13. Application. The site plan application for this plan requires a signature. Signed application is attached. Please find two sets of revised plans attached here for your review. Please call if you have questions. Regards, PATTON ARRIS RUST & ASSOCIATES 10 anne Maidens SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department.of Planning and Development Use only. Date application received Application It Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return. 1. Project Title: Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 2. Location of Property: Warrior Drive (Address): 3. Property Owner: Sherando Towne Centre, LLC Address: P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, VA 22604 Telephone: 540.667.2120 4. Applicant/Agent: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Address: 117 B. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 5. Designer: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Address: 117 B. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Contact: Joanne Maidens t 6a. Is this a standard or`minor' site plan? Standard• X Minor 6b. Is this an original or revised site plan? Original X Revised 7a. Total acreage of parcel to be developed: 0.82 7b. Total acreage of parcel: 0.82 8. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number: 050015751 b) Current Zoning B2 C) Present Use: Vacant d) Proposed Use: Restaurant e) Adjoining Property Use(s) Commercial 0 Adjoining Property Identification Number (s) 060015751 g) Magisterial District (s) Opequon I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature i Date 0 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK NOV 2 7 Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 November 27, 2007 Ms. Joanne Maidens Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site Plan Comments — Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 Frederick County, Virginia Dear Ms. Maidens: Upon review of the revised site plan received October 25, 2007, we offer no comments at this time. Therefore, we recommend approval of the subject site plan. Sincerely, doe C. Wilder Deputy Director JCW/n lr cc: Planning and Development file SI-1ERANDOTO«T'CTRLOT4 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 November 2, 2007 Ms. Joanne Maidens PHR&A 17 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan 980-07; Sherando Towne Center Lot 4; Property Identification Number (PIN): 86-A-102F Dear Ms. Maidens: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1. Project Summary. Provide the PIN for this property in the project summary section. Also, provide the drive -through length (required and provided) in this section. 2. Setbacks. When providing the setbacks for the building, the shortest distance to a property line should be listed as the provided. In addition, the provided "side setback" should be broken down into left and right side provided. 3. Parking Calculations. This building appears to be a fast food restaurant which requires parking spaces at 1.4 per 100 square feet of building space. Provide the required parking accordingly. 4. Signage. Show any proposed signage for this property. Proposed freestanding signs should be of monument style. Signage not shown on this plan will require a site plan revision in the future. Revise the signage note accordingly. 5. Driving Lanes. The arrows which indicate the driving directions should be edited as shown on the plans to adjust for the one-way area behind the drive - through. A "one-way" sign should be added as shown on the plans. 6. Dumpster. The proposed dumpster pad location does not appear functional for this site. It is located on a one way strip which prohibits trucks from backing in, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Ms. Joanne Maidens Review Comments for SP 980-07 November 2, 2007 and the location on Warrior Drive and the pedestrian trial is undesirable. Consider moving the dumpster as shown on the plans. If the dumpster remains as is, additional landscaping along Warrior Drive will be necessary. 7. Sidewalks. The proposed sidewalks do not appear to provide any pedestrian benefit for the site. To provide a safe walking area which keeps the flow of traffic in mind, provide a sidewalk around the perimeter as shown on the plans. 8. Stop Signs. Provide a stop bar for the newly proposed entrances and a stop at the end of the drive -through line. 9. Lighting. Revise the lighting note to state that "all lighting is to be controlled to prevent offsite glare onto crjoining properties and ri hts-of-wa ." Provide a detail of the actual lighting units in addition to the provide light pole detail to ensure that glare will be deflected. 10. Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks at the entrances to the site. 11. Landscaping. On the landscaping plan, provide the landscaping calculations for the parking lot and impervious area. The Leyland Cypress trees used for screening the dumpster pad should be a minimum of four feet tall at time of planting. Cypress is spelled wrong on the plan. 12. Legal References. Provide the deed book and page number for all existing easements and rights -of -way. Provide a speed limit for Warrior Drive. 13. Application. The site plan application for this plan requires a signature. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. When the plan is ready for approval, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, Public Works Department (County Engineez), the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. I Sincerely, Lauren E. Krempa Platmer I LEK/bad cV Sherando Towne Centre, LLC, PO Box 2715, Winchester, VA 22604 Attaclunent COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Sherando Towne Centre, LLC PO Box `2715 (� I Winchester, VA 22604 r4-ZXzL DC o9 i?ETuRN TO G hii�E_h� ATTE_MPTEU - ?IO'1 KhIO4JT� UT1AELE TO FORWARD EEC: 2' OL500033=k3017-1i E:,0 02 •0.L COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 December 27, 2007 Ms. Joanne Maidens Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Second Review Comments for Site Plan #80-07; Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 Property Identification Number (PIN): 86-A-102F Deal- Joanne: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies have been adequately addressed. Please review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1. Parking Calculations. The parking spaces for this development need to be located on lot 4. It does not appear that Sherando Towne Centre lot 5 has adequate parking to accommodate the uses in the retail center in addition to providing the needed spaces for the restaurant. Sherando Towne Centre was approved with a total of 231 spaces and was approved with 29,640 square feet of retail floor area, 4,800 square feet of office floor area and 5,080 square feet of restaurant floor area. There are uses approved in the lot 5 building that have a higher parking ratio than what was originally approved on the site plan. A fill accounting of the actual uses (existing and proposed) needs to be provided for lot 5 to determine if a shared parking agreement can be approved. 2. Signage. The site plan shows a monument style sign but the note states that the sign will be 35 feet in height and 100sf in size. A sign no more than 15 feet in height and 100sf should be provided. 3. Lighting. Revise the lighting detail on sheet 4 to eliminate the "drop" lens option. Also, indicate if any building mounted lighting is proposed. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Ms. Joanne Maidens Review Comments for SP 1180-07 December 27, 2007 After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. When the plan is ready for approval, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at ]east five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frecerick County Inspections Department, Public R'orks Department (County Engineer), the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frecerick County Sanitation Authority, and the Virginia Department of Ti•ansporlcition. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Plamier CEP/bad ccSherando Towne Centre, LLC, PO Box 2715, Winchester, VA 22604 Attaclunent COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 JA N 8 2008 Sherando Towne Centre, LLC PO Box 2715 Winchester, \"' ^axx=e aoi CE Oa 01✓O.s✓oa RETURN TO SENDER ATTEMPTED - NOT KNOWN UNABLE TO FORWARD GC: 22601500307 a3017-09571--23-39 II I III III )I I I l) i l l u) M IIII)II) I I I, II I I I I) I I I I I I I I I I I I h I) I II COUN o +REDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 November 2, 2007 Ms. Joamie Maidens PHR&A 17 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Review Comments for Site Plan #80-07; Sherando Towne Center Lot 4; Property Identification Number (PIN): 86-A-102F Dear Ms. Maidens: Planning Staff has reviewed the above -referenced site plan to determine if administrative approval can be granted. At this time, administrative approval cannot be granted. This site plan is denied until the issues in this letter, as well as all issues of the other review agencies have been adequately addressed. Pleasc review Staffs comments listed below and then prepare a revised site plan which adequately addresses each concern. Review Comments: 1. Project Summary. Provide the PIN for this property in the project summary section. Also, provide the drive -through length (required and provided) in this section. 2. Setbacks. When providing the setbacks for the building, the shortest distance to a property line should be listed as the provided. In addition, the provided "side setback" should be broken down into left and right side provided. 3. Parking Calculations. This building appears to be a fast food restaurant which requires parking spaces at 1.4 per 100 square feet of building space. Provide the required parking accordingly. 4. Signage. Show any proposed signage for this property. Proposed freestanding signs should be of monument style. Signage not shown on this plan will require a site plan revision in the future. Revise the signage note accordingly. 5. Driving Lanes. The arrows which indicate the driving directions should be edited as shown on the plans to adjust for the one-way area behind the drive- tlu•ougli. A "one-way" sign should be added as shown on the plans. 6. Dumpster. The proposed dumpster pad location does not appear functional for this site. It is located on a one way strip which prohibits trucks from backing in, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 • • Ms. Joanne Maidens Review Comments for SP 1180-07 November 2, 2007 and the location on Warrior Drive and the pedestrian trial is undesirable. Consider moving the dumpster as shown on the plans. If the dumpster remains as is, additional landscaping along Warrior Drive will be necessary. 7. Sidewalks. The proposed sidewalks do not appear to provide any pedestrian benefit for the site. To provide a safe walking area which keeps the flow of traffic in mind, provide a sidewalk around the perimeter as shown on the plans. 8. Stop Signs. Provide a stop bar for the newly proposed entrances and a stop at the end of the drive -through line. 9. Lighting. Revise the lighting note to state that "all lighting is to be controlled to prevent offsite glare onto adjoining properties and rights-o -wad." Provide a detail of the actual lighting units in addition to the provide light pole detail to ensure that glare will be deflected. 10. Crosswalks. Provide crosswalks at the entrances to the site. 11. Landscaping. On the landscaping plan, provide the landscaping calculations for the parking lot and impervious area. The Leyland Cypress trees used for screening the dumpster pad should be a minimum of four feet tall at time of planting. Cypress is spelled wrong on the plan. 12. Legal References. Provide the deed book and page number for all existing easements and rights -of -way. Provide a speed limit for Warrior Drive. 13. Application. The site plan application for this plan requires a signature. After you have revised the site plan, please resubmit two copies so that I may verify the information contained on the plan. When the plan is ready for approval, I will need all approved review agency comment sheets and at least five copies of the final plan for approval. Comment sheets are required from the following agencies: the Frederick County Inspections Department, Public Works Department (County Lnginee7), the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, and the Virginia Department of Transportation. Sincerely, Lauren E. Kreinpa Planner I LEK/blid cc: Sherando Towne Centre, LLC, PO Box 2715, Winchester, VA 22604 Attach. rent The following information must be included on your site plan. If your site plan is incomplete or is missing information, it will not be reviewed and returned to you for revisions. Administrative Information Y N 1 2. 3 4 6 7 General Site Information Y N 8 Name of proposed development. Name, address, and phone number of owner. Name, address, and phone number of developer. Name, address, and phone number of designer. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. A space labeled "Approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of a variance approval. (Reference the variance application number.) 10. Location map (scale 1:2000) 11. Magisterial District 12. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 13. North Arrow 14. Zoning of site 15. Use, zoning, an Property Identification Number (PI all adjoining properties. This includes properties ocated across right-of-ways, streams, and railroad tracks. 16. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels. 0 i General Site (con't) Y/ N ✓ 17. Acreage of all lots included in the plan. 18. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas. dwelling 19. The location and type of all units. 20. Location and description of all recreation facilities. 21. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways. 22. Location and area of common open space. _r 23. The location, height, and dimensions of all signs. Ueol 24. Location, height, and specifications of outdoor lighting fixtures. 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas. 26. Location of outdoor trash receptacles and dimensions of structure (fencing, etc.) required to enclose receptacles. Buildina Information Y/ N 27. The height of all buildings and structures. .%, 28. Location of all buildings, structures and uses. 29. The proposed use of each building, structure and area. 30. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts. Roads Y N ✓ 31. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 32. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site. 33. Posted speed limit of existing adjacent roads. 34. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways. 10 ./ 35. Location of all entrances on adjoining roads within 200 feet of the proposed or existing entrance. 36. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads. Utifities Y N 37. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals. 38. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility, and drainage easements. 39. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet Fire Code requirements. Parkina Y N 40. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces. V�"N 61 41. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used. 42. Location and dimension of all disabled parking spaces and ramps. Natural Features Y N 43. Existing and finished contour lines. 44. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, t: sinkholes, and other environmental features. 45. Location of streams and drainage ways. Landscal2 t Y N 46. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used. WM WV VLIK- 47. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 48. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used. 49. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan describing the location and methods to be used to minimize erosion and sedimentation during development. 12 n • SITE PLAN APPLICATION Department of Planning and Development Use only. Date application received /*4 Application # —d Complete. Date of acceptance Incomplete. Date of return. l . Project Title: Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 2. Location of Property: Warrior Drive (Address): 3. Property Owner: Sherando Towne Centre, LLC Address: P.O. Box 2715 Winchester, VA 22604 Telephone: 540.667.2120 4. Applicant/Agent: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 5. Designer: Patton Hams Rust & Associates Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Contact: Joanne Maidens 1 6a. 6b. 7a. 7b, 8. a) b) c) ci) e) 0 u Is this a standard oi- `minor' site plan? Is this an original or revised site plan? Total acreage of parcel to be developed: Total acreage of parcel: Property Information: Property Identification Number: Current Zoning Present Use: Proposed Use: Adjoining Property Use(s) Adjoining Property Identification Number (s) 0 Standard x Minor Original X Revised 0.82 0.82 050015751 B2 Vacant Restaurant Commercial 060015751 g) Magisterial District (s) Opequon I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature Date • • Request For Site Plan Comments Department of Planning and Development Mail to: Department of Planning and Development Attn: County Planner 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to: 107 N. Kent St. North Building, 2"d Floor Winchester, VA (540) 665-5651 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the site plan with this sheet. Applicant's Name Address: Patton Harris Rust & Associates c/o Joanne Maidens 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Name of development and/or description of the request Location of property: Warrior Drive Planning and Development's Comments: Planning and Development use only Date received Incomplete Date reviewed Signature and Date Signature and Date (revision) Date revision received Incomplete Date reviewed Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 Date approved 0 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates Sherando Towne Centre Lot 4 Frederick County, Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Narrative October 10, 2007 Project Description The purpose of this project is the development of a restaurant on approximately 0.8 acres. The site is located 1.5 miles east of I-81 near Stephens City northeast of the intersection of Fairfax Pike (VA State Rt. 277) and Warrior Drive in Frederick County. A site location map is provided on the Plans. Construction will consist of a building, and a parking lot with associated storm water controls, and extension of water and sewerage and other utilities. A total of 0.6 acres will be disturbed during construction. Existing Site Conditions The site is a vacant grassed area characterized by slopes ranging from I to 4 percent. The site area eventually discharges to Wrights Run through various storm water channels. The site is vacant and covered with grass. Adjacent Areas The site is bordered by commercial to the north, south and east; and Warrior Drive to the west. Offsite Areas No offsite areas will be disturbed. Soils The on site soil is 3B Blairton silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes. (A soils map is provided as Attachment A.) This soil is moderately deep, gently sloping, and moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown silt loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil extends to a depth of 30 inches. In the upper part it is yellowish brown, mottled silty clay loam. In the lower part it is light yellowish brown, to strong brown, and mottled channery silty clay loans. The substratum, to a depth of 36 inches, is yellowish brown, mottled very channery silt loam. Fractured shale is at a depth of 36 inches. Permeability in this Blairton soil is moderately slow. The available water capacity is low. Runoff is medium. The erosion hazard is moderate. Natural fertility and organic matter content are low. The shrink -swell potential in the subsoil is low. The root zone extends below a depth of 23 inches, but the seasonal high water table restricts root growth. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1/2 foot to 2 feet from November through March.. These soils are in the hydrologic soils group C Critical Areas There are no critical areas. Every reasonable effort to control erosion shall be used in this project. These controls include, but are not limited to, silt fence and inlet protection. U 0 Erosion and Sediment Control Measures 1.0 General 1.1 Description: A. Work Included: Erosion and sediment control operations and devices required for this work are indicated on the drawings and include, but are not necessarily limited to: 1. Installation of control devices; 2. Maintenance of control devices; 3. Temporary forms of stabilization; 4. Removal of devices and site restoration. 1.2 Standards: A. The following codes and standards, latest editions form a part of this specification, to the extent of all provisions applicable to the work required for this project, and as specifically referenced herein. 1. All work shall comply with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook and as amended by local codes and regulations. 2. VDOT Specifications are those contained in the latest edition of the Virginia Department of Transportation, Road and Bridge Specifications. 1.3 Protection: A. Use all means necessary to protect all materials incorporated into the work of this site before, during and after installation. In the event of damage, immediately make all repairs and replacements necessary to meet the approval of the Owner's Representatives at no additional cost to the Owner. B. Maintain and protect all benclunarks, r110rlrlrllerlts and similar reference points and, if they are displaced or destroyed by these operations, replace same as directed at no additional cost to the Owner. 1.4 Permits: A. The Owner will secure certificates and permits and pay for all fees required by local codes and regulations. The contractor shall ensure that value of the erosion and sediment control work to include maintenance and all seeding of disturbed areas shall be included in the overall project performance bond. 2.0 Execution 2.1 General Requirements: A. Limit grading to only those areas involved in current construction activities. Limit length of time for exposure of unprotected graded areas. Permanent stabilization of graded areas shall be done within seven days after construction is completed. If permanent stabilization cannot be provided, temporary seeding, mulching or other forms of stabilization shall be provided. Patton Harris Rust & Associates 2 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2139 • 0 B. Constriction entrance, silt fence, and inlet protection shall be constructed as part of the initial phase of construction and shall be made functional as soon as possible. Other sedimentation control devices will be constricted as rough grading allows. Construction of the devices shall agree with the details shown on the plan subject to modifications thereof that the County Engineer deems advisable. Regardless, the sediment control devices shall comply with all requirements of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. They shall remain in place until all surfaces within the project are stabilized such that siltation will not occur; i.e., all upstream areas from the control devices have vegetation established, mulch in place or furnished pavement completed or other protection provisions are applied. C. The Contractor agrees to hold the Owner or any of its agents harmless from any and all liability or damage that may arise fi-om a violation of the siltation ordinance and agrees to indemnify them against any loss. D. Underground utility lines shall be installed in accordance with the following standards in addition to other applicable criteria: 1. No more than 500 linear feet of trench may be opened at one time. 2. Excavated material shall be placed on the uphill side of trenches. Effluent from dewatering operations shall be filtered or passed through an approved sediment trapping device, or both, and discharged in a manner that does not adversely affect flowing streams or off -site property. 4. Restabilization shall be accomplished in accordance with these regulations. 5. Applicable safety regulations shall be complied with. E. Permanent or temporary soil stabilization shall be applied to denuded areas within seven days after final grade is reached on any portion of the site. Temporary soil stabilization shall be applied within seven days to denuded areas that may not be a final grade but will remain dormant (undisturbed) for longer than 30 days. F. Control will be exercised through sequence of land disturbing operations, limiting duration of exposure of un-stabilized areas and installation and maintenance of physical control devices coordinated with sequence of construction. Devices used are shown on the drawings and include, but are not limited to: 1. Construction entrances — (STD & SPEC 3.02) There is a high potential for tracking mud on to adjacent roads during wet site conditions. Construction entrances are needed at the location shown on the plans to clean the tires of vehicles and equipment exiting the job site. 2. Silt Fence — (STD & SPEC 3.05.1) Reinforced silt fencing shall be placed along the down - slope side to filter sediments before runoff exits the construction area. 3. Storm Drain Inlet Protection- (STD &SPEC 3.07) Storm drain inlet protection shall be installed immediately following installation of storinwater controls or prior to construction activities for existing storm drains, to prevent sediment from entering the storm drains. Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2139 3 • 0 G. Sequence of Land Disturbing Activities: General: All applicable mechanical controls are to be constructed as the first item of work. Following their completion, rough grade, finish grade and install appropriate erosion sedimentation aids. Retain control devices until final stabilization of all areas or as directed by the County Representative. Sequence of Construction a. First Phase: 1. histall construction entrance; 2. histall culvert inlet protection 3. histall silt fence, where applicable. b. Second Phase: 1. Strip topsoil to stockpile area if applicable. 2. Provide vegetative cover if over 7 days; 3. Silt Fence, where applicable. c. Third Phase: 1. Rough grade; 2. histallation of utilities and parking lot stone base; 3. hilet protection. d. Fourth Phase: 1. Finish grade and paving. e. Fifth Phase: 1. Seeding of disturbed areas not paved; 2. Seed stockpile of surplus soils; 3. Removal of remaining sediment controls, upon approval by County. H. Maintenance Program: All control measures are to be inspected daily by the site superintendent or his representative. Any damaged structure should be repaired at the close of the day. Inlet protection devices and silt fencing should be cleaned at 50% capacity and spread on -site where practical No control shall be removed without the site inspector's prior approval. The daily control measure inspections by the contractor shall be documented to indicate findings and corrective action taken. These reports shall be submitted to the County on a monthly basis. Patton Harris Rust & Associates 4 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2139 u E I. Permanent Stabilization: All disturbed areas not paved will receive at a minimum 4" of topsoil and be seeded as follows: 200 lbs Tall Fescue per ac. 12 lb. Annual Rye per ac. 1000 lbs. 10-20-20 Fertilizer per ac. 2 tons agricultural limestone per ac 2 tons straw mulch per ac. Permanent seeding will occur as a final phase of construction. Temporary Stabilization: Seeding to stabilize areas left denuded for more than seven days, but not yet at final grade shall be as follows: 60 lbs German Millet per ac. (May through September) 60 lb. Annual Rye per ac. (October through April) 450 lbs10-20-20 Fertilizer per ac. 2 tons agricultural limestone per ac 2 tons straw mulch per ac. Seeded areas to be watered and cared for as necessary to provide grass emergence. Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2139 • • 3.0. Storm water Management: All on -site structures have been sized to pass the 10-year storm using the Rational Method. Storm sewer calculations are provided on the Plans or in Attachment B. On -site drainage areas are illustrated on the Plans. Storn water management for proposed development area was included in the Sherando Town Centre Erosion & Sediment Control Narrative dated: October 26, 2004. The storm water management results were as follows: The proposed development area will discharge to a culvert that is just east of the site along VA State Rt. 277 and to a Swale northeast of the site. Pre development about 12.23 acres drain to a swale northeast of the site, 3.61 acres drain to a roadside ditch along VA State Rt. 277 southeast of the site and 2.53 acres drain west. Post development all the areas drain east mostly through detention ponds (1.04 acres drain undetained to the ditch along VA State Rt. 277 southeast of the site) to either the swale or the ditch With the proposed on site ponds in place the 10-year peaks to the ditch along VA State Rt. 277 southeast of the site and to the swale northeast of the site after development is less than the predevelopment peak and there is no drainage to the west. See the table below. Thus the development will have no negative impacts on the down stream chamiels. The ponds are design to pass the 100-year storm through the standpipes associated with the ponds with 2 feet of freeboard. The pre -development drainage area was modeled using Haestad Methods PondPack 9.0. The SCS unit hydrograph method was used to generate the 2, 10, 100-year storm hydrographs. Times of concentration, runoff curve number, network summaries, and other pertinent calculations for pre -development conditions are provided in Attachment C of the Sherando Towne Centre E&S report dated October 26, 2004. The post -development drainage area was modeled using Ilaestad Methods PondPack 9.0. The SCS unit hydrograph method was used to generate the 2, 1Oand100-year storm hydrographs. Times of concentration, runoff curve number, pond routing and structure data, network summaries, and other pertinent calculations for post -development conditions are provided in Attachment D of the Sherando Towne Centre E&S report dated October 26, 2004. Results from the pre- and post -development analyses are as follows: Pre 2-Year Peak cfs Post 2-Year Peak cfs Pre 10-Year Peak cfs Post 10-Year Peak cfs Northeast swale 15.08 14.48 35.36 35.40 Ditch along VA State Rt. 277 Southeast 3.12 3.67 9.03 8.45 West 2.12 0 6.21 0 Site total 20.32 17.64 50.59 43.80 Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2139 6 SHEET NUMBER 47 • • - ' (Joins sheet 41) 147 1 ;E n 6C 1C % 41E 4O 1E �' / y 98 N ee I� 1 AlE 29 9B I) 36 �. 9B 4r0 • 0 • p 6C 8C 1`r 9B 3B 9C \' 1C llE 00 �.. 0 ly 41D v l B8 •.9C• 41E E B 6C .. water r, LL I 41D o 38 /LO / 96 41C"' 9B {++ 41D 18 1C II 98 41D 1C O41C E17 41C 3B w lc 3B 6G1 0 9B ° - 9B .•.. % 41C j 98 A1B v v 98 N 3B o '.41C `e t 3B i / 38 0 00 g r 0 3B \ 1C 9B , 3C 3B m a 0 cn sl A/ 44B I C a o • 96 / 3B 3C 41D ) 1 C yG I 18 a 0 0 / 36 —.. / 41D4n E E 0 1C 3B 38C 3q w o a o o E 44B w 41E o (V - 1c yr 44B w o N w .. O 3B 777 E S 38B 0 9B 1B d 636 m 3B \ 98 3B ' y 41C 9B / � ~ m o o 1B 36 1C 1C 3B 41D •� t77 O <r w w 3c \ 41D 1C _ 3B 0 i 9B . / 1C �41E o w t 41C PT 1C 0 3C 3C 1B EIG .• € _ 1Bt C 1C p 41E 41E iB Qlc .;' /-••-•, z095000 FEET (Joins sheef 52) • ATTACHMENT B SHERANDO TOWNE CENTRE LOT 4 Storm Computations r M Sherando Towii Centre Lot 4 Storm Computations October 10, 2007 n(cpp) Culvert Summary = 0.012 Culvert Inv. In Inv. Out L(ft) D(in.) S(%) Type Q(des)cfs q(10)cfs v(10)fps From Cap.Chk 1 744.49 744.32 16.7 15 1.00 CPP 7.01 2.72 5.72 Str. 1 o.k. 2 745.56 744.69 87.4 15 1.00 CPP 7.01 1.31 5.72 Str. 2 o.k. 3 745.99 745.76 23.1 15 1.00 CPP 7.01 1.03 5.71 Str. 3 o.k, 4 747.16 746.19 97.2 15 1.00 CPP 7.01 0.71 5.72 Str, 4 o.k. 5 749.00 747.66 134.5 15 1.00 CPP 7.01 0.65 5.72 Sir. 5 o.k. Storm Inlet Summary, and Sump Inlet Depth and Spread Calculation. Str, No. From Q(10)cfs Inv. In Inv. Out Inv. In. Top Elv. Type UHw/d Sx(fUft) d(ft) hw elv Spread(ft) 1 1 0.76 744.69 744.49 747.66 751.50 DI-3C 6 0.0385 0.1 751.10 2.6 2 2 0.27 745.76 745.56 750.40 DI-1 0.0213 0.1 750.50 4.7 3 3 0.33 746.19 745.99 750.68 DI-1 -- 0.0110 0.1 750.78 9.1 4 4 0.71 -- 747.16 751.00 DI-1 -- 0.0227 0.1 751.10 4.4 5 5 0.65 -- 749.00 751.80 DI-1 -- 0.0135 0.1 751.80 7.4 Drainage Area Summary DA Area(ac) C CA T(c)min i(2)in/hr i(10)in/hr 0(2)cfs Q(10)cfs 1 0.14 0.80 0.11 5 5.4 6.8 0.60 0.76 2 0.05 0.80 0.04 5 5.4 6.8 0.22 0.27 3 0.06 0.80 0.05 5 5.4 6.8 0.26 0.33 4 0.13 0.80 0.10 5 5.4 6.8 0.56 0.71 5 0.12 0.80 0.10 5 5.4 6.8 0.52 0.65 • S��L'rC�,tao own C.-ei,6,- 1 d� V Chapter 9 — Storm Drains /U/o9/o�, Appendix 9C-13 Performance Curve DI-1 in a Sump Source: VDOT 50 1 IN DISCHARGE ((--FS) 1 of 1 VDOT Drainage Manual -1itI., ., 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc En&eers, Surveyois, Planners, Landscape Architects P l[ 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 H+A\Vmchester, Vllglllla 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 Memorandum Mark Cheran, Planning Joe Wilder, Public Works Tim Welsh, Fire and Rescue John Trenary, Inspections John Whitacre, FCSA To: Loyd Ingram, VDOT From: loanne Maidens Date: October 24, 2007 Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: Sherando Towne Centre, Lot 4 12536-2-0 cc: Dave We've Prepared plans for a restaurant site in Frederick County, VA. The site plan includes proposed parku-rg and related utilities. Access to the site will be from an existing entrance on Warrior Drive. The site is served by public water and sewer. Storm water management is provided by a regional pond under a separate site plan.. If you have any questions, please give me a call. • kTA" "lL Ce fite-9 SITE PLAN CHECKLIST /O//0/o Jj The Site Plan Checklist, shown below, lists the information which is required to be on each site plan. Site plans which are incomplete or missing information, will be returned to the applicant (s) for revision. Project Information Section (1) A title that includes the name of the proposed or existing business and a subtitle which describes the proposed development. ✓ (2) The name, address, and phone number of the land owner, developer, and designer. (3) The Frederick County Property Identification Number (PIN) of all lots included on the site plan. (4) The number and type of dwelling units included on the site plan for residential uses. (5) The total land area and total developed land area of all lots included on the site plan. V (6) A detailed description of the proposed use or uses of the development, as well as a description of the existing use or uses. (7) A reference to any other site plan or master development plan approved by the county for the site. (/ (8) The date the site plan was prepared and a list of all revisions made, including the date and a description of why the site plan was revised. (9) A table of contents including all pages of the site plan. (10) A list of all proposed utility providers, with their address, name and phone number. (11) An inset map showing the location of the site, along with the location of streets, roads and land uses within five hundred (500) feet of the property. (12) A statement listing all requirements and conditions placed on the land included in the site plan resulting from approval of conditional zoning or a conditional use permit. (13) (14) Calculations Section (15) A description of setbacks or conditions placed on the site as a result of an approved variance. The name of the Magisterial District the property is located within. Calculations showing the Floor Area Ration (FAR) of the site, including the maximum allowed FAR, total ground floor area, total floor area, and total lot area. L'] • 0 �! (16) Calculations showing the total number of required and proposed parking spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (17) Calculations showing the total number of required handicap spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. ✓ (18) Calculations showing the total number of required loading spaces, including the total number of existing and proposed spaces. (19) Calculations showing the total number of required perimeter and interior trees required, including the number of provided trees. (20) Calculations showing the percentage of the property that will be landscaped and the percentage of woodlands disturbed. Site Plan & Details Section ✓ (21) The location of all adjoining lots with the owner's name, specific use, zoning, and zoning boundaries shown. (22) The location of all existing or planned right-of-ways and easements that adjoin the property, with street names, widths, and speed limits shown. (23) All nearby entrances that are within two hundred (200) feet of any existing or proposed entrances to the site. ✓ (24) All existing and proposed driveways, parking and loading spaces, parking lots and a description of surfacing material and construction details to be used. The size and angle of parking spaces, aisles, maneuvering areas, and loading spaces shall be shown. ✓ (25) A North arrow. (26) A graphic scale and statement of scale. (27) A legend describing all symbols and other features that need description. ✓ (28) A boundary survey of the entire parcel and all lots included with distances described at least to the nearest hundredth of a foot. ✓ (29) The present zoning of all portions of the site, with the location of zoning boundaries. ✓ (30) The location of all existing and proposed structures, with the height, specific use, ground floor area, and total floor area labeled. (31) The location of all existing and proposed outdoor uses, with the height, specific use, and land area labeled. (32) Existing topographic contour lines at intervals acceptable to the Zoning Administrator. Proposed finished grades shall be shown by contour. (33) The location of the front, side, and rear yard setback lines required by the applicable zoning district. 10 (34) The location and boundaries of existing environmental features, including streams, floodplains, lakes and ponds, wetlands, natural stormwater retention areas, steep slopes, and woodlands. (35) The location of outdoor trash receptacles. (36) The location of all outdoor lighting fixtures. (37) The location, dimensions, and height of all signs. j' (38) The location of required buffers, landscaping buffers, and landscaped screens, including examples, typical cross sections or diagrams of screening to be used. The location and dimensions of required fencing, berms, and similar features shall be specified. NA (39) The location of recreational areas and common open space. (40) The location of all proposed landscaping with a legend. The caliper, scientific name, and common name of all deciduous trees. The height at planting, scientific name, and common name of all evergreen trees and shrubs. (41) The height at planting, caliper, scientific name, and common name shall be provided for all proposed trees. The height at planting, scientific name and common name shall be provided for all shrubs. ✓ (42) The location of sidewalks and walkways. ✓ (43) The location and width of proposed easements and dedications. (44) A stormwater management plan describing the location of all stormwater management facilities with design calculations and details. ✓ (45) A soil erosion and sedimentation plan describing methods to be used. l� (46) The location and size of sewer and water mains and laterals serving the site. j (47) Facilities necessary to meet the requirements of the Fire Code. ✓ (48) A signed seal of the certified Virginia land surveyor, architect, or engineer who prepared the plan. (49) A space labeled "Approved by the Frederick County Zoning Administrator" for the signature of the Zoning Administrator, approval date, and a statement that reads "site plan valid for five (5) years from approval date." Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME LCand- e Angie Mark Dana Eric Mike John Lauren COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): IDS 0 10 /a(01 1 U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd