The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About011-68 City of Winchester (Airport) - Backfile�reberirk Tonn#g �Depar#men# of 1lanning anb Pe6rto nient H. RONALD BERG 9 COURT SQUARE PLANNING DIRECTOR WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 J. WILLIAM RILEY, III ZONING CODE ADMINISTRATOR m e m o r a n d u m August 20, 1976 TO: J. 0. Renalds, III, County Administrator FROM: H. Ronald Berg, Secretary, Planning Commission SUBJECT: Forest Lake Estates (Mobile Home Park) Site Plan No. 34 Please be advised of the following Planning Commission Resolutions of August 18, 1976: BE IT RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia does hereby recommend denial to the Board of Supervisors of said County of the Site Plan application by Rayland Corporation (H. Ray VanDyke and T. G. Adams) for Forest Lake Estates (Mobile Home Park - CUP No. 62) of 491 spaces on 123 acres located in Opequon Magisterial District, having duly considered the following: (a) The arid tendency of the stream in the vicinity of one of the two planned recrea- tion areas, which had been reviewed by the Board of Supervisors, Planning Com- mission, Sanitation Authority and Staff; (b) Safety, health and welfare of residents downstream from the proposal because of the stream's tendency toward dryness; (c) State Water Control Board has not approved the waste treatment plant and the Plan- ning Commission should not be forced to approve the mobile home park before the treatment plant is approved; and (d) Requested spaces increased from the original 173. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Planning Commission for the County of Frederick, Virginia does hereby respectfully request the Board of Supervisors of said County to forward immediately following their consideration of this request any instructions, comments, questions, etc., should they resolve to return it for further changes, etc. By HRB / fmd 703/662-4532 26 WINCHESTER EVENING STAR Thursday, August 19, 1976 INVITATION FOR BIDS CITY OF WINCHESTER APRON, TAXIWAYS, LIGHTING AND FENCING at WINCHESTER AIRPORT SEALED BIDS for FAA ADAP Apron, Taxiways, Lighting, and Fencing at Winchester Airport, Winchester, Virginia, will be received at the Office of the City Manager, City Hall, Win- chester, Virginia, until 2:00 P.M., EDST, Sep- tember 9, 1976, at which time and place all bids will be publicly opened, and all bid prices read aloud. The project includes the following work and improvements: 1. 8400 sq. yards aircraft parking apron (flexible pavement) 2. New taxiway 40' x 1500' (flexible pavement) 3. Strengthening existing taxiway 3100' x 40' (flexible pavement) 4. New medium intensity taxiway lighting 5. 16000 LF 6' chain link security fence The Information for Bidders, form of proposal, form of contract, plans and specifications may be examined at the Office of the City Manager, City Hall, Winchester, Virginia and the Office of The Thomas B. Bourne IV Associates, 5026 Herzel Place, Beltsville, Md. 20705. Copies may be obtained from the of- fice of Thomas B. Bourne IV upon payment of $50.00 for each set. This payment is non refundable. The proposed contract is under and subject to Executive Order 11246 of September 24, 1965, and to the Equal Opportunity Clause. The bidder must supply all information required by the bid forms. Each bidder must deposit with his bid, security in the amount of five (5) percent of the con- tract amount bid, subject to the conditions provided in the Information for Bidders. Each bidder must submit a completed E.E.O. questionaire with his bid. Any bidder wishing to withdraw his bid must give notice in writing of his claim of right to withdraw his bid within two business days af- ter the conclusion of the bid opening procedure in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 4, Sec. 1 1.20.2 of the Code of Virginia. Otherwise no bidder may withdraw his bid until after a period of ninety (90) days after the date of the bid opening. CITY OF WINCHESTER By: Wendell Seldon, City Manager L 7 or, P-11 E NWRY "-FORT 1,CR ',' 11 1 .. IV ;Cjj-•.rn:,, XTNICI k-k-P-1 I WTlZC:; P1,3TER YT-17 ^P, L L 197 1_1 CHAPTER 5. &1VIRONMENTAL STUDY. A. General. This Environmental Impact Statement, as required by Section i02(2)(c) of the Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91-190, is submitted by the Coon Council of Winchester, Virginia, sponsors of the Winchester Municipal Airport. The Common Council has received a Planning Grant Agreement for as- . sistance under the applicable sections of the airport and Airways Development Act of 1970, for the systematic. orderly and planned development at Wincheater Municiyal Airport. This statement is intended to present the probablo.impRa.t: on the human and natural environment:,as the airpo:^t is developed.. The present airport is located in Frederick County, on a• 159 acre site: with an additional 47 acres of. clear zone ease:uenta, There are two Y-Itntrdy0f, one paved 4500 feet long by 100..feet wide, and one (N--S) tusk' strip 1850 feet long by 160 feet wide. The paved runway (Runway 14•-32) i_s connected by a 60 foot wide parallel paved taxiway for 3600 feet of its length. The paved runway is lighted with -nediu:nmintensity runway edge li.Chts and the taxi- way is lid;: ted with low -intensity edge lights. .In addition, thc3.e is a paved apron of 300 feet by 85 feet, There is a ;rain hangar structure consisting of aircraft storage and maintenance areas, offices, and tee hangars on. the site. The expansion of Winchester Municipal Airport is planned in several stages. A currently approved (FAA) project consists of a, 19,600 dquare yard aircraft parkin,apron with lirhtinf-, and additional visual lie:hting aids for the IN19.4 SE runway. An extension to Runway 14-32, 1200 feet by 100 Poet, is planned. A parallel taxiway 2600 feet by 40 feet, to the NW runway end, is planned for construction along with the runway extension. Also, -the existing portion of the taxiway will be strenEthened to support increased business type aircraft operations. Additional aircraft :maintenance and storage hangars, tee hnng.j)�s and a small terminal building are planned for later construction stages. An air traffic control tower and other air navigational aids will be installed as and when determined feasible by the FAA. The planned improvements and ad- ditions are scheduled for the period through 1994. The purpose of these proposed projects is to provide and insure tho proper i facilities, adecuate to meet future aviation requirements in Frederick County and surrounding areas. The projects will furnich the necessar-y facilities for the continued growth of general �.viation activities and services. 5-1 Sirnificant noise affect areas are those which may experience noise levels above the 100 composite noise rating ('CNR) level. The current and the expected higher and lower noise level contours are shown on Asap 110.3, for 1974, and on. Yap No.4, for 1994. The ultimate airport for the 20 year planning period, is applied and shown in order to factually present a currently accurate picture of the expected noise situation. Thus the City of Winchester and Frederick County planners will be furnished data in order to minimize affects for their planning of compatible land uses in each of the noise sensitivity zones. Winchester Municipal Airport is expected to develop. over the next 20 years an a busier General Aviation Airport. Propeller aircraft operations are predomi- nate now, in.1974. Turbo -jet business aircraft operationswill. increase consid- erably by 1979 and thereafter. The various aircraft tpper, and their noise af- fecto are given in Table 5-1, Chart for Selecting Noise Contours. T'i.gures 5-•1, Perceived poise Level Contours for Takeoffs of Jet and. Propeller Aircraft shoit's the two basic contour sets for types of aircraft - pr6poll.er and -et powered. For 1974, the Two -Engine Light Piston Business Aircraft, Table 5-1 , is aP-- plicable for a reduction of Contour Set 9 B, Figu.ro 5-1, by a minus 10 PNdB.. The j.pproximately 6,300 annual operations, 17 por day, or 6 takeoffs per day also adjust3 the contours for an additional minus 5 PI\'dB in accordance with Table 5-2, Operational Corrections to Apply to Perceived Noise Levels far Take- offs and Landings. The 1974 Composite Noise Rating (CNR) levels are shown on Noise Sensitivity Zones, Map No.3-1974. For 1979 and after (through 1994), the applicable Aircraft: Type, from 'fable 5-1, is Business Turbojets. Figure 5-1 also shows the contour: set 9 A, which applies to Business Turbojet Aircraft Types with no PNdB co Te ctions. Per- ceived Noise Level Contours -- One Engine Runups, show that the one en.-ine r nup sets do not apply because they fall within contour set 9 A, Figure 5-4, Cell eralized Variation of Perceived Noise Level with Distance for Civil Medium and Short Range Jet Transport and Business Jet Aircraft, shows that there is no cor- rection to the contour set for distance from the anticipated aircraft types. As further explanation for the application of Table 5-2, Operational Cor- rections to Apply to Perceived Noise Levels for Takeoffs and Landings, the daily number of takeoffs (or landings) must be determined. Tho number of annual jet operations is projected through 1994 in Table 2-7 of Chapter 2. 'OL I 5-2 The public and industry of the area will continue to be served safely, 4dquate- ly and without.interruption. It is the Runway 14-32 extension, for a total runway length of 5,700 feet, which will be the controlling environm(sntal influence from the Winchester pun- icipal Airport. The significant area which will be affected is one delineated by semi -circles of 10,OCO and 14,000 foot radii, from the centerline at each end of the runway primary surface, connected by tangent lines. The inner enclosed area comprises the imaginary Horizontal Surface and the outer area is the imag- inary Conical Surface. They are shown on Map No.2, Airport Control Surfaces, Airways and Control Zones, which are in accordance with the latest ammendmen.ts to the federal, Air Regulation, Pant 77-Ob,-jects Aff'ecti.ng Navigational hi.irspace. In addition to the Horizontal and Conical. Surfaces, so;ne areas extending beyond the 14,000 foot delineated surface, which will experience some noise affects, are shown on the Noise Sensitivity Zones Maps, described later.. The above areas are referred to hereinafter as the Airport and Vicinity. The relationship of the Airport and Vicinity to existing and future resi.dent- ial.areas, subdivisions, schools, historic landwarksi, and parks and recreationf17. areas are`als'o shoLm on the Noise Sensitivity Zones Napa. More specific 1)1.an-- ping relationships are presented in Chapter 1, Section P, Local and Regional Public Facilities Planning.. The following statements are concerned with the environmental aspects of the proposed development of Winchester Municipal Airport and the anticipated coordin-, ated planning efferts to be undertaken in order to provide the most compatible Airport and Vicinity with the surrounding community areas. B. Noise Ipevels. The Noise Sensitivity Zones, Neap No..3--1974 and Map No.4-1.974 show Winchester Municipal Airport for,those years with the ultimate 1994 development, based on the twenty year :Waster planning study period. The plotted nets of noise con- tours were derived from the Technical Report "band Use Planning Relating to Air- craft Noise", by Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Inc., October 1964, and Appendix A Lhereto dated.X:ay, 1955. FiCures 5 - 1 throu(--h 5 - 4 and Tables 5 -- 1 through 5 - 4 are also utilized froz that report. 5-3 To arrive at the average total daily jet operations at general aviation airports# experience, -indicates!: that practically all business jet operations are on week- da's. Thus, from Table 2 - 7, at 261 week days per year, the average total daily opera„io.ns is obtained. Since Table 5 - 2 appliO3 to takeoffs, or land- ir.f�s, (not the combination which c•inati.tutes total olerations) the average daily takeoff approximates one half of average daily -operations. Thus, the nverage total of jet daily trskQoffs expocted are: less than 1 for 1974, 4 for 1979, 6 for 1994, 9 for l.":99 and 12 for 1994. When jet takeoffs avera:,c less than one per day, it is not considered. Tile average number of takeoffs during the day expected in 1979 is 4 (within. 3 - 9 range of Table 5 - 2), which results in a correction of contour set 9 A by a minus 5 PIMB. The 1994 average daily' namber of tai;eoff:l will- to 1'' (tfi.thi_�i I.C�- 30 range of Table 5 - 2) which: has no correction. SactOr to ecm.tOur set 9 A. The ulti.nate 1994, OR, noise affects, are shown on Noise Sensitivity Zone,,r l:aP No. 4 - 1994. For the period 1979 to 1994, the CNR and 211 Zone adjustments,. is detpi-nined by reducing; each cunt-iur shown by 5 PNdp. Each Yap shows the four sensitivity zones and from Table; 5 3, the conpatub3.0 land use for each zone can b established.. Planning; for land use should con-, cider the ultimate airport develop;ent represented by Slap No.4.1 for 1994, in ac- cordance with the delineated zones.' Zone I is beyond the area -of- the 90 CI;R contour,;. `dtld.etPint entai use affects of practically all activities. Zone II is the area between the 90 and 100 CNR contours, The planning and construction of new schools, churches, hospitals and auditoriums should be avoided unless a detailed noise reduction analysis is made for each particular f'rcility. However, the non-compatability shown for 1994, and even before, viJl1 allow adequate time for planning noise control -reduction methods for a facility end/or noise abatement by aircraft engine equipment and flight procedures, such as are now being improved at many airports. Zone III is that area between the critical 100 OR and 115 OR contours. As indicated on Man, No.4-1994, lost of this area is open land, zoned Agricultural - General, Business, Industrial, and Residential-Liiited by Frederick County (Also See Figure 1 - 15). A limited number of existing, residences, are affected with -- in the zoned Residential area, directly South of the airport, along isognrnts of Buf flick Road, Route 645. Zone III for 1979 to 1991 is within the shorn 105-120 Ct1B contours.on Map No.4-1994, as prevoiusly explained. 5-9 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY CHART'FOR AIRCRAFT NOISE Noise Composite Noise LAND USE COMPATIBILITY Sensitivity Rating (CNR) Zone N ;� r3 e--• iL _ •r •}•) CL{ •r O `� Slf w w 41 w N •r Q Nf U Cl a- iv •r . Takeoffs -� o� N- C C) •r -� N C) r- a i. i C1 O L s. O C) L CL O ini.1 i. . and Ground N ,= 4J 4-.r- +.� +3 . o +3 o 1 Landings Runups = C)n t �-a +, +, o ov z, . 'i r I Less Less h Note Note Than 90 Than 70 yes yes yes yes yes (A) (A) yes yes Note Note iI 90-100 70-80 yes yes I yes Note yes ' (C) (C) no yes yes Note Note 100-115 80-95 (8) Ves (Cr (C) u ro no no-- yes yes 1 IV greater Greater „ j �o 1.e Note ' Than 115 Than 95 no (C) 7o no no no no yes (C) NULL (A) - A detailed noise analysis try qualified personnel shouldhe*vndertaken for all indoor or outdoor music auditoriums and all outdoor thea-Cer, (B) - Case history experience' indicate. :,��,Y in da . ;d;�,IS in riva�.e residences may complain, perhaps vigorously. Concerted group action is possi5se. New, single dwelling construction should 4 generally 6e avoided. For high densi y dwellings (aver.ments).const ruction, Note (C) will apply, w . (C) - Avoid construction unless a detailed analysis of noise ~eduction requirements is made and needed noise control features.are Included in building designs - ELEV 1122.5 CONICAL ZONE (20 1) -z� _—T\\ • HORIZONTAL ZONE ELEV. 872.5 'X1a�f -- _- �--z— iHANSITIONAL ZONE 17=11 A/W IA ELEV. 722.5 R/W ]2 - T ELEV. 701.0 - -- ---, TRANSITIONAL ZONE (7:11 ELEV. 1122.5 APPROACH ZONE (40 11 CONICAL ZONE 12011 HORIZONTAL ZON ElEV l723�/ ?• ____ -__'S..^'i ..� . R/W 52 END ELEV. 7010 - i NO. REVISIONS BY APP, DATE CITY OF WINCHESTER WINCHESTER AIRPORT WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA AIRPORT ZONING MAP DESIGNED By, T. B.B. IV TRACED BY F. R. H. DRAWN BY: F.R.H. CHECKED BY: T. B. B.IV DRAWING NO. SCALE: NOTED DATE SEPT. 1970 SHEE T I OF j LOCATION MAP 5 0 5 10 15 20 25 SCALE IN MILES INTERSTATE ROUTE n U.S. ROUTE say STATE ROUTE IMPROVED ROADS UNIMPROVED ROADS RAILROAD — — — — — — — PIPELINE --670 TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOURS , 700 ARP AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT (ESTABLISHED ELEVATION — 722.5') 1100 AERIAL CONTOURS LIMIT OF IMAGINARY SURFACES AIRPORT PROPERTY LINE ST' goo, 6�l/'_-5 �:,:�;: �.��- _._�. _...�m� .,ter_ .�.....� , _- _ . �_ � .. w.---------- 0.: _ NOTE, TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INT AERIAL CONTOUR INTERVAL 0 - 1000 2000 3000 4000 I■ ■ 1000, . I �