Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutZoning Petitions Prior to 1966 - BackfileL 8 0 8 0 3 CEN�orthwestern CERTIFICATE OF AUTHENTICITY START This is to certifity that the micrographic images appearing on this roll of microfilm: Are accurate reproductions of the records of MAI F�TIVMM and were microfilmed in the regular course of business pursuant to established routine company policy for systems utilization and for the maintainence and prevention of such records through the storage of such microfilms in nrotected locations, I.t is further certified that the photographic processes used for microfilming the above records were accomplished in a manner and on microfilm which meets the recommended requirements of the National Bureau of Standard of permanent microgrpahics reproductions, Date Microfilmed Camera' pe for ill M Lj Locates . _� .� Location io ze � ri d ignature W, & S. k H W N39* 54' E-4 91. 75' O in N a LO z oO p 4 3 SZ p,N IRON LOT l 0 O cV IRON PIN 2 ° o j IRoo E� v The above Plat is a survey of the Remaining Portion of the Clyde Logan - Lupton Tract. The said Improved Land fronts the western highway boundary line of the Valley Pike - P. S. # 11, just south of Kernstown# in Shawnee District, Frederick County, Virginia: Beginning at an iron pin in the western highway boundary line of the Valley Pike, a corner to the T. ". Adams Lot, running with the two following lines of the said Lot N 510 25t 30" W - 225-00 ft. to an iron pin; thence S 200 041 30" W - 2n0.00 ft. to an iron pin in the northeastern line of the Fsso Standard Oil Company Lot; thence with the said line N 51,0 251 3011 355.30 ft* to an iron pin in the southeastern R/W line of the W. & S. Rail road; thence with the said line N 390 541 E - 491.75 ft. to an iron pin corner to the Hi.melright Lot; thence with the southern line of the said Lot S 690 "t 30" E - 3�71.6�0 ft. to an iron pin corner in the western high- way boundary line; thence with the said line S 200 041 30" W - )4.45.41 ft* to the beginning,* �- �_O_ �2 aa4 Containing - - 7.15 Acres. LEE A• BERT, Certified Land Surveyor, Surveyed - - - July 231 19b2. Comm. of Virginia #t 484.0 WAY ROBINSON, JIB. tog SOUTH STEWART STREET WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA `z o �vsti'(' �Fh�r� l �� /�- � SHAOV ° o/2 0 Q � V � O ? � 2 C Q�co 0 a W EL A4 Rpq D- S 550 �o R-p_� RT 65 W - l ,23 OSRON P'N 74. N 5CP 06'W-1001 N 3zio 54' E- 1512. 22' IRON PI z°11 z°- pd � O Y s� �2 *0 oa o °59'E- 213' 11 N 39054' E-9 66. 41' -IRON PIN _W L S._R_R. LAND `aON0 W & S. RR. R' O- W The above Plat is a Survey of the Ray Robinson Farm, The said Land fronts the wostorn highway boundary line of the Valley Pike - U. S. 110 the southern boundary lines of the Kernstown Road - Rt. 652 and the southeastern boundary line of the Shady Elm Road - Rt, 651, at Kerns - town, in Shawnee District, Frederick County, Virginia. Per inning at an iron pin at the intersection of the western high- way boundary line of the Valley Pine with the southern boundary line of the Y;ernstown ^oad, running with the two following boundary lines of the o Kernstown Road N 80W - 779.35 ft. to an iron pin; thence N 810 W - 5�k .3J ft, to an iron pin at the intersection of the said boundary line with the southeastern boundary line of the Shady Elm Road; thence with the said southeastern boundary line S 550 101 W - 1723.05 ft. to an iron pin corner to the Tremonti Orchard Land; thence with the northeastern line of the said Land S 390 06f 30" T' - 160iO4 ft. to an iron pin corner in the northwestern line of the Winchester & Strasburg Railroad Riiht - of - !-ray; thenc with the said line N 390 541 E - 1512.22 ft, to an iron pin corner to the Railroad Land; thence with the two following lines of the said Land N 500 06) `.ti' - 100 ft, to an iron pin; thence N 390 541 F - 966,41 ft, to an iron pin in the western highway boundary line of the Valley Pike; thence with the said line N 180 59' E - 213 ft. to the beginning, Containing - - 74.93 Acres, LFE A. FB'FRT Certified Land Surveyor Surveyed - - - March 26, 1962 Comm. of Virginia # 434 IRAY ROB)N50N, JRt 409 SOUTH STEWART STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA Zan i.4ij 6E''o cdr�r / I -e— ' v "11 BEFORE THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION P E T I T I O N To: Members of the Frederick County Planning Commission The undersigned owners of Lots 10 and 11 of the C.W. Taylor Subdivision and Lot 9 in Block 2 of the Lela M. Miller Subdivision, fronting on the North and South sides of the Buffalo Lick Road and more particularly described by plats hereto attached and as a part of this Petition, hereby respectfully request the members of the Planning Commission of Frederick County, Virginia, to zone said lots as Business -General (B-2). Said lots are presently proposed to be zoned Residential (R-1). This request is made as the property as it presently exists on both sides of the Buffalo Lick Road extending East from its ititersection with U.S. Highway No. 522 is heavily business and your petitioners believe and so allege that the property fronting on the Buffalo Lick Road will grow more as a business development than as residential. Respectfully Submitted, James Edward Wisecarver and Peggy Ann Wisecarver By: Counsel ��' September_, 1966. September 2, 1966 Frederick County Planning Commission Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia Gentlemen: The undersigned wishes to make application to the Frederick County Planning Commission with respect to the planned zoning of land near Ninevah where the undersigned owns certain real estate. I am the owner of a 70-acre tract of land situate about one and one -eighth miles West of Ninevah on the Refuge Church Road, Opequon Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia. This land was purchased in 1964 for $15,000.00 from P. H. Johns and R. E. Lee Speaks and is being used for an automobile junkyard. It is my understanding that the area in which this land is located is zoned agricultural, and it is my wish to request that the Planning Commission consider the propriety of zoning the area in which this 70-acre tract is located from an agricultural to a business district which would permit the continuance of the business for which the land is now used by me. If the Planning Commission would wish me to appear before it in further support of this request for a change in the planned zone, I would be pleased to do so. matter. Thank you very much for your consideration in this Very truly yours, Richard D. McComas L. c�, q Winchester,ta. Aw ust 13,1966. Mr.James Gelladay Chiirman The Frederick County Planning Commission Winchester,Virginia. Dear sir; This is another a.p )eal being made to you,before it is to late,te get the properties known as Colonial Heights,located on the eastern edge of the city of Winchester,zoned R-2 and not R-1. The writer feels that his desires concerning this property should be gr4.nted.Not with the :Hiring of an attorney to come before you and make a fine ta.lk,or with telling you a lot of half truths,as some others are doing,to grin their desires,but by :asking for your fairness in considering these facts. That we have owned and develaDed this property over the last twenty three years and have tried to cooperate with country officials at all times.Thv.t we have paid. large taxes. That we have not asked for favors from county officials but have been asked for sAveral which we have, always granted.That we have tried to operate a very respectable developement and feel our reputation is good in the community in which we onerate.A credit to the county and not a detriment.That we should know best what this property should 'be zoned after warking with it for this long period of time. We,Norman N.Garrisen and the writer,owners of Col©nil Heights make this as another attempt to have this property zoned the way we would like to have it. Res ectfully yo s '.F,P.Rartin 20 Colonial i ei ,rtts Winceester,"o- . (;e -17 i TO THE BOARD OF SUP&- iVISOIRS OF FREDERICK COUNTY AND THE PLATTITING COMMISSIO11 OF FREDERICK COUNTY We, the undersigned business people of the Winchester, Frederick County Community protest, in general, the location of JUTTK YARDS and AUTOLOBILE G'-tA L 'ARDS in si ,ht of arterial highvays in the area, and, specifically, the proposed relocation of Zuckerman Company, Inc., between U. S. Route 11 and Interstate Route 81 in the Stonewall District of Frederick County. We do hereby request that the Master Plan of Fredericl- County be respected and that proper zonin- ordinances for the county be passed immediately to protect all of the property otimers : agricultural, residential, comnerci al, and industrial. .r. .Lr /�% i - 'fe's the mdersisinod bVin, ileng n _rl, 4r 11's or U.1, ,,OtmtY CwnMItY nrotostg In ew-oral, t,.he loantlon Of mr., and At70,'4DML-'!-,, in qir-.ht of art �n y in Grial bilf-:111 a 8-PeOiftcallYt WIG PrO73090d relch-atIon of .-;,,UcI-.ermen betwom V. SO -.'oulte 11 and Lnterotnte -"Oute C-1 1p. the staftemll- of Fredevidr, cmmtyo 1,40 cq, !,n" roe .uwt ti,!nt t^c isster 'T'lan o:r T71--d.,orick Gotntr be xftegpa,�I-U-O" aDA- that proper nonbng ordinances f�.- tl,.-,o coomty be ner!v., tely t© nrotect all of t*,.)-e nroperty tern s n r--rica'-Iturm" regidantic-1., ccv, , -,or. cl -rid Ind t-, s ge, - 61�- \r TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISO LS OF 1 RED'E IC"-K COTITY AT'?D TI'.E PLANNING COMMISSION OF F'REDERICK COUTTITY We, the undersigned business people of the Winchester, ! ederick County Co,-nmunity protest, in general, the location of JUINK YARDS and AUTOMOBILE GRAVEYARDS in sight of arterial highways in the area, and, specifically, the proposed relocation of Zucl-erman Company, Inc., between U. S. =route 11 and Interstate -'-route 81 in the Stonewall Distl ict ofFrederick County. We do hereby request that the Master Plan of Frederick County be respected and that proper zoning ordinances for the county be passed im;, ediatel _-i J protect all of the property owners: agricultural, 1,/cou$ercial, and industrial. MR0,"SR Ben Air Motel ,tpnhPnc City. Va?2655 -z�Lel Gentlemen: I ari here in behalf of the Citizens of Fredericka County, Stoneuall District, to protest the relocating of Zuckerman Company, Inc., in the Stonewall District appro::ii-iiately 3-1/2 U. S. rules North of Winchester Between/Poute 11 and Interstate lioute 81. This is one of the better residential sections in Frederick County. The homes in this area range from 5,,21V-,000 to "'I 000. We know that the value of our homes will decrease. The loading of cars and the Dressing of old car bodys will cause considerable noise, and there is also a vermin problem. But, just as impo3�tant, if not more so, is the beauty of F!redericl. County. On Route 11 alone there is a traffic count of & �� vehicles per/ Sy / c/L+C. (, Q✓� �'V�'C�C!( I fee the people who ti,rll� .rantin�r purchase property in this area for ::"uture homes will turn away from our coruriu ity. Would any one of you purchase or build homes in this area if Zuckerman Company is allowed to locate in this area.. We realize ttie County needs junk yards and also means of disposing of old cars, but we feel if the beauty of Ii'rederick County is to be preserved, this type of business must be out of sight of our main highways, I have del- with the Zuckermans for a ntirnber of years. I have found them to be honest and civic minded, and I certainly AZope they will abide by the vrislaes of the Citizens in the Stone- wall District and try to wort- out a new location for the business. -2- We feel the Land use Plan is a good one as it is set up now. They have mapped our area as residential and farming. But for the unfortunate illness of our Commonwealth Attorney, NO. Massie, and Chairman of the Planning Commission, Mr. Golliday, we feel the Zoning Ordinance would be :such further along, if not completed. Again, Gentlemen, I would like to remind you of the damage financially to our homes and health of our families. I would also like to ask you if you have ever seen an attractive junk yard. We have presented to the Board of Supervisors a petition from the Citizens of Frederick County with the signatures of 343_ citizens opposing the relocation of Zuckerman Company, Inc., in this particular area. Present business petitions. Films of our homes for any of you that are not familiar with our location and also films of Zuckerman Company, Inc. FILL CLERK of- , H JIT COURT Fdk WDEMCK NTY, VA. ft'.Tw-T I 0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ON T-tPDNESDAY, APRIL 7, 1965, AT 2:00 P. M. IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ROOM, FREDERICK COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING) 41"INCHESTER, VIRGINIA. Please take notice that the Planning Commission of Frederick County, Virginia, will hold a public hearing at the above time and place to consider the petition of Charles A. Pine, Sr., Alfred de Mazzon and Jeanne de Mazzon requesting an amendment to or special exception from existing zoning regulations effecting the following property: Those certain two (2) adjacent tracts or parcels of land containing 'three and one-fourth (3 1/4) acres, more or less, in the aggregate, in Stonewall Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, fronting on the East side of U. S. highway No. 11 and on the South side of Virginia State Secondary Road No. 661, commonly called Red,Bud Road, being the same property sometimes called the "York Inn" property. Said property lies within zoning area "B" and said petition -requests an amendment or special exception permitting the said land to be used for commercial purposes as a motel4 restaurant and/or automobile service station, and�o used-ca�ori mobi3e-home-Ua3es-3ot: Proposed plans, ordinances and amendments may be examined in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia.. FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COI✓1vLTSSION t Br Geretary (6-6- -17 HARRISON i JOHNSTON ATTORNITR Al LAW WIMCM[STCR. VIR61MIA n BEFORE THE BoKM Or SUPERVISORS OF FMERICK COMM.. VIRGINIA: i APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIOiI OR AMEPIDl W TO ZONING To the honorable Supervisory of Frederick County, Virginia: r The undersigned, Cberlls A. Pine, Sr., Alfred and Jeanne de Mazzon, respectfully petition the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission and/or Zoning Administrator as follows: I. Petitioners are owners of a certain tract or parcel of land situate in Stonewall Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, fronting on the East side of U. S. Highway No. 11 and on the South side of Virginia Stake Secondary Road No. 661, commonly called Red Bud Road, containing three and one-2'ourth (A) acres, more or less, being the sage land acquired by the said Alfred de Mazzon, by deed dated August 1, 1944, and duly recordedin the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 196, at Page 5b, said land being the property formerly known as "York Inn", I and being as appears on the sketch attacted hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 2. Charles A. Pine, Sr. believes that the aforesaid !and is zoned residential, said land failing within Zone B. At the time of' the enactment of the existing Zoning Law the subject land was a nonconforming use inasmuch as it was then improved by York Inn, a restaurant/motel business. The improvements were destroyed by fire more than two (2) years ago. 3. Your Petitioners believe and therefore allege that the development of the land in the neighborhood of the subject property during the years since enactment of the Zoning Ordinances, and particularly the influence and impact of construction of U. S. Interstate Highway No. 81, has rendered the subject land unsuitable for residential purposes but highly desirable and suitable for commercial purposes, including use as a motelgJ restaurant.and/ter automobile service station, Pri ra.^ �r rr>r} i In 6�1_1 I WHEFWORE, your Petitioners respectfully apply for a special exception: i from and/or amndmnt to the existing Zoning Ordinances which would remove tix f existing residential zoning restrictions on the subject three and one-fourth I (A) acre tract and, permit the land to be used for caszosrcial purposes as a motel, restaurant and/or automobile service station, and,/or used ca-r and/or soble cl<XO!'s sales lot. s CHARI,- A. PINE, SA. i Ai.PR© de MMCM JSANNE de MKZZON I f By- -_-- — - — 1 HARRISON & JOHNSTON 25 East Boscavlen Street Winchester, Virginia Counsel for Petitioners - I Irl All On SDAY RcnzCE oB pt C HWJW ol� THE p II�� Tr IN THE ROT'CB ?' i965 at 2 c OO P - M. EASTERN `/IR�3INI IA. or BUPA , Res CoMJTy OFFICE BUILDING O WINCHESM, please take notice that the Planning Coimmiseion of Frederick Countyp Virginia, will hold a pUblie hearing at the above time and plane to consider the petition of OWze Developments, Inc. and H. W. Butler Bro., Inc. requesting an gMndment to and variance from existing sonin8 regulations effecting the following described properties: 1. That certain lot or parcel of land, containing approximately one and three -fourths acres, more or lees, situate in Stonewall Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, at the southwest corner of the intersection of U- 8- Highway No. 11 and Virginia secondary Road No. 661 (the Welltown Pike) and, g. That certain lot or parcel of land, containing 1.54 acres, more or less, lying West of and adjoining the lend described above. O"d property ].jog `rithin zoning area "B" and the said petition requests &1 &Mtk%1VM11t &A& vsxignoe to permit said land to be used for an sutOwbila -service station, motor hotel or restaurant - proposed plans, ordinances WA amendments may be examin1ed in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virgin & FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING � COMMI SION BY ere dry r , 5-. ,-:,Y aJ?s J�r�• k�' + I� aJ `tee.. Minutes of Meeting; Held Feb. 39 1965 At the regular meeting of the Frederick County Planning Commission held in the Supervisor's Room on the 3rd day of February, 1965. pR OM: James Golladay, Ebner Venskoske, G. G. Teets, Clyde Heishman, C. W. Franks, and George B. Whitacre. Mr. William A. Johnston explained to the planning commission the petition of Glaize Developments, Inc. and H. W. Butler & Bro.,, Inc. requesting an amendment to and variance from existing zoning regulations at the inter- section of Route 661 (the Welltown Pike) and U. S. Route No. 11. A discussion Was had on the variance. A motion Was made by Grover Teets and seconded by Clyde Heishman to approve the variance. Upon motion duly made and seconded the commis s ion was adjourned. 11 Re pectfully submitted Geo B. Whitacre, , a,•y Ike l4 F i, ^. e r�,r���' F r •.g F. e$.� .�,.:i � ..� �, .. al � <�4�,., ; L It vt 'N ik ♦ N. �' yy �:" 4 1 vvl f .r = � }1°�' RT , y x N INC i �d"� T lF,t i ,, k�; ;i ta! r •• y�l � ^ 7 .� �, � ee" . �f s - k � � 'S:, }t -' •� *,'�` i - _�4 r,. �; E.' l k , ° L', t .fit''.• ,,� t����,_.yv e o+�t�vrah' { � wf1ltj .r fii s, l a lrr .F •� ��- yb,�� S� . 1�+• . 4 '.,d a� ,V � .yf w� �����A' \ �� �1 '+14.0 R .& � .d*4 1, A'i i „�. F •et a o ^tt t ,' 'y'_' bts't�\'A'CS�P`a+++}' i "„I" !� 4\ •• T� _ .�.1 . ^4• 4 t �i -1{ ss T yi V Mai€ ' P. It,,t•,3.J; WADI' t _ �}fit.-., � _ -��' �,jta'�y��45 ro: i1T .' yy''��•7 ', p� -y-y� tr '. i`I` ��� ° � �c 'T 7C t�.t xl_-t i'' i�r€ may,. T s. it R 3 * j•�R w. i �w�r, i� OT 4�'•. e.''r4' l.,F..' M �e3 C. `� 'tVrj,,�`''a,x•i•'�"'���.�k� e 3fi�k ^: '>`&k`a �•;7€ ✓e�p, y•• 7 I` •.t'• 'a,-,� l' ^ t r •S ` t t , !t ? ^G t a� 7#k b ,,:.•, 1r > o =�1'•' ,tri P, ia:Y ship! 7�'tal y- 1 �i.l 6�'� It �4 '�"I .I taj°1 t Y,, rs7. t t ry b>.t y �...l i'i x� 1. .. l .,� t .S '�C!.•° 4 ..r N k`,3 r�+�."�,.�.tF t�t�7. N ��f'� �� 3 � .ky g� LYt�{1 .� =�17 } � r.:�4 , �, w •` 1 ;j rgr`ta �r� i�d{sen ,�&��q+�' � � �, �k �s $°I�" v� t°r.•tk �itr`� �� �j m ��� E�«y 'd � iMrz$ µ�� � !� �` A 4 f ,. .7 M .a 3 " t• ,I rl "tr � a i.�y� lb i _AA F�'kp �¢{}ty r ``t��#i a l •::�, { . tt :. i . :4 _s� a y,, ►� °i i`�; 7 ' a + ''� ¢ r ` si i t a r � ►�Ulul, Q...".Q I mn���innm u A LLL wr. James W. Golladay, Chairman, itederick County rlanning Commission, a Golladay building Supply, ine., Stephens Uity, Virginia. gear Mr. Golladay; AREA CODE 703 TELEPHONE 662-6127 RAY ROBINSON, JR. OWNER, INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPER 809 SOUTH STEWART ST. WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA November 19, 1964 I have been advised by the vrederick County Board of super- visors that my property located at hernstown at the intersection of u.S. Route 11 and State Route 652 has been indicated on the land use map as an industrial area. Further, i have been advised that in the event of a future zoning ordinance for this section that 1 should'write you now indicating my desire that this area, owned by me, be zoned for industrial use. i am enclosing a plat of my property along with the descript- ion of same showing proposed" streets to be approved before being constructed. This letter and enclosures to be filed and serve as a matter of record should some be required in the future. Thank you for your attention in this matter. 6incerely, it Robins r. nhJr/d cP TOO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIR GINIA: The Planning Commission of Frederick County, Virginia, after due notice to the public, published in the Winchester Evening Star for two successive weks, had a meeting on March 3, 1960, for the purpose of examining the petition of Dr. W. D. Myers for a variance in Zoned Area A for the purpose of remodeling that certain building commonly known as the Steak House into a multiple dwelling building. Present: Chairman Earl E. Shade, C. W. Franks, Claude N. Heishman. Absent: hover Teets and James Golladay Also Present was E. A. Kelsoe After a general discussion concerning the petition, on motion made by Franks and seconded by Heishman, the following resolution was unanimously passed: Be It Resolved, that a variance be granted to Dr. W. D. Myers, owner of that certain building commonly known as the Steak House, located on the northeastern corner of the intersection of Myers Avnue and Route 50, in Zoned Area A. for the purpose of changing said building into a multiple dwelling pm building with addition# to be built thereon if desirable. according to Apecifications filed herewith. Respectfully submitted, E. Earl Shade JOSEPH A. MASSIE, JR. ATTORNEY AT LAW WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA i- CL0,ET IL Olt Ge,o - / Ce'll - -) rT- LIUING F-L(rt,-, 1-,LAQ 1-0 WWI t 6fkll - /� "-) -4::p L4 --] !�I P1,11 �- LEE N. WHITACRE. CLERK ELLIOTT MARSHALL, JUDGE 0 Clerks (Mire rrbvrick (ILI'ountu ff ircuit (court Winchester, 33ir$inia :February 15, 1960 At the Regular Meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, held in the Supervisors Room over the Clerk's Office on the 8th day of February,. 1960. VARIANCE - STEAK HOUSE - W. D. XYMS Upon motion duly made and seconded the following request from W. D. Dyers was referred to the Frederick County Planning ComnIsasion, said Commission to investigate and report the same to the Board of Supervisors at the RegulRr Meeting to be held on the 14th day of March, 1960. "Please be advised that I have inherited the real estate of the late B. P. "re, deceased, and that as owner of that certain property designated as the Steak House. I do hereby make formal application to the Board of Supervisors and the Planning, Commission of Frederick County for the purpose of oonverti.ng the Old Steen house into a multiple dwelling building, and, for said purposes, to renovatic the present building and make additions thereto by enclosing the stai.rwaW on the Ust side of the building and adding, a wing on the forth side of the same, and do hereby,petition the Board of Supervisors for a variance for said purposes, and do hereby' submit my letter from the archi sect and his plans, drawings and specifications of said building,. I would appreciate it if this matter was considered by the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission as rapidly as possible." A COPY TESTE: Deputy Clerk i February 3, 1960 TO THE FREDERICK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Gentlemen: Please be advised that I have inherited the real estate of the late B. P. Myers, deceased, and that as owner of that certain property designated as the Steak House, I do hereby make formal application to the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission of Frederick County for the purpose of convening the old Steak House into a multiple dwelling building, and, for said purposes, to renovate the present building and make additions thereto by enclosing the stairway on the East side of the building and adding a wing on the North side of the same, and do hereby petition the Board of Supervisors for a variance for said purposes, and do hereby submit my letter from the architect and his plans, drawings and specifications of said building. I would appreciate it if this matter was considered by the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission as rapidly as possible. I believe that you will see from the drawings, plans and specifications that this whole area, which • is now a blight upon the community, will be turned into a beautiful asset. • Very truly yours, W. D. Myers KEITH WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 110 NORTH CAMERON STREET. WINCHESTER. V I R G I N I A PHONE M O H A W K 2- 5 7 6 7 Myers Property, opposite James hood High School at Fox Drive & U.S. Rt. 50 November 15, 1959 Summary Sheet .for Cost Estimate for Proposed Apartment Renovation Total of items previously listed 25% contingency reserve Contractor Overhead at 15% Profit at 10% A R C 1-1 1 T E C T S KEITH WILLIAMS. AIA HUBERT T. STRATTON, AIA ?11�13, 546. oo 5,400.00 .1i,16, 946. oo LI,2LI.0,00 Gross Cost `j21,186.00 KEITH WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 110 NORTH CAMERON STREET, WINCH ESTER. VIRGINIA PHONE MOHAWK 2-5767 Exterior Costs and Miscellaneous Items A. Removing concrete apron New Sidewalks & Stoops, etc. 270 sq.ft. = 30 yds. at "15.00 and subgrade B. Regrading front 100 yards fill and grading at 25 loads by $8.008 Seeding C. Repainting roof, dcrmers, windows, etc. D. New shutters--8 pairs at ,35.00 painted E. Offstreet parking at rear -- stone driveway for 6 carsAnd 2 at front 4000 sq. ft . of subgrade and stone F. Electrical Entrance 200 Amp and panels A R C H I T E C TS KEITH WILLIAMS. AIA HUBERT T. STRATTON, AIA y3 25.00 450.00 200.00 350.00 280.00 325.00 425.00 $2,060.00 KEITH WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 110 NORTH CAMERON STREET. WINCH ESTER. V I R G 1 N I A PHONE M O H A W K 2- 5 7 6 7 Summary of First (1st) Floor Renovation Costs A. General Patching & Cutting Items ARCHITECTS KEITH WILLIAMS. AIA HUBERT T. STRATTON. AIA 1. Closing doors (2) at 050.00 ea. 100.00 2. Removing Rear Porch 200.00 3. Cutting New Windows (5) at •$70.00 ea. 350.00 4. Removing toilet partitions 25.00 5. New 361, stair/one story 250.00 B. New partitions 960 sq.ft. at q,,,.60 576.00 C. Nine (9) doors at 845.00 405.00 D. Paint throughout 2000 sq.ft. at 2 coats 180.00 Paint throughout 2000 sq.ft. at 1 coat 100.00 E. Two (2) closet doors at $75.00 300.00 F. Two (2) baths at $400 each 800.00 G. Two (2) kitchens at $400 each 800.00 H. 1400 sq.ft. floor finish at ".11 154.00 I. Ten (10) outlets at $6.00 120.00 Fixture allowance $50.00 50.00 J. General Patching (plaster) 150.00 General Patching (carpentry) 500.00 K. Radiation 300.00 85,141.00 KEITH WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 110 NORTH CAMERON STREET. WINCH ESTER. VIRGINIA PHONE M O H A W K 2- 5 7 6 7 Summary of Second (2nd) Floor Renovation Costs A. General Patching & Cutting Items 1. Closing Doors (3) 2. Removing Partitions B. New Partitions 650 sq_.ft. x .60 C. New Doors at $45.00 (5 doors) D. Paint throughout first and second coats only E. Three (3) closet doors at $75.00 F. Four (4) baths at $450.00 G. 145 sq.ft. floor finish at .11 H. 30 outlets at $6.00 Fixtures at $100.00 I. General Patching (plastering) General Patching (carpentry) j . Radiation K. 4 Kitchens $450.00 Third (3rd) floor renovation costs A R C H I T E C TS KEITH WILLIAMS. AIA HUBERT T. STRATTON, AIA 150.00 6o.00 380.00 225.00 350.00 225.00 1,800.00 165.00 180.00 100.00 160.00 350.00 400.00 1,800.00 86,345.00 NONE KEITH WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATES 110 NORTH CAMERON STREET. WINCH ESTER, V I R G I N I A PHONE M O H A W K 2- 5 7 6 7 December 10, 1959 RE: Proposed Renovation, Myers Property Route 50 and Fox Drive Winchester, Virginia Dear Dr. Myers: A R C H I T E C TS KEITH WILLIAMS. AIA HUBERT T. STRATTON. AIA Enclosed please find a report on the above project together with suggested preliminary plans. In order to establish a budget figure which you might use to deter- mine the feasibility of the project, it was necessary to prepare preliminary sketches for take -offs of labor, materials, etc. These could no doubt be improved upon, both economically and plan -wise -- in the interest of time and fee we restrained them to one study only. The cost figures should be ample --most are based on national costs and are those we use regularly in our practice. As a next step, you might wish to review this information with a builder. If we can consult further or prepare additional information please advise us. Perhaps, it would be helpful to review this survey together. Very truly yours, ti Keith Williams KW/bk Enclosures LEE N. WHITACRE. CLERK (91erk's Office 4reberirk Tauu#U Tirrui# Tour# 'fflirtr4est$r, Uirginin NOveniber 13 , 1958 Dear ix: ELLIOTT MARSHALL, JUDGE At the regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors, held in the Supervisors' Doom on the 1pth day of November, 1958-; th= r( sulutiori for a variance in thct Xuning of owed tire& tt,4f1 to permit e grocery store to be Oderated in the building known as the Steak House, was pussed . lution. Phase find enclosed �% co -y of the reso- Copies sent to: Very truly yours, L., B N. WHITACM y Clerk James ` . Golladay C. W. Franks � L �( Grover Tests ��------- Earl Shade Heishman CZo y 00 film W4 4 soms" ad Is No rw "a tw us opudotlds of P# mooby me *►'1tw*q*hwtt # *Utw °iss for a VVI&W is * smug: poriv tom"Ir opro " tieRostawma a" ow r ( ) 4wo f"m tbo 4aft homoto Of p*r* l Cyr vii 0 k-UL DiliWO 0 i1a ED Upon wtloa# duly s00004od# the SO&M at F# lson tat is grotl= of grestul a war anaa to Ls F* l asalCto 1 11A a #Miss OWN SM dodo = the vest of AWts M In :MW AM '*d * (th# ► Wag restristod) be voterred to is Fkat co . fflaw of Frouxlsk Co tYv Virginia for Its r000m"Motial and If Opp"' 0 the SPOOMestions to to tn"s style sad am"? of WWUC to bo orootsd* Ord t lmfttlw tO' M We, -the undersigned, property owners and residents of 'C Sensen�c--!=-- -f zstateRoute 65i, Frederick County, Virginia, hereby petition the Planning Board and the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, to zone for residential purposes only an area and section of the said Senseny Road described and bounded as follows; Commencing at the intersection of the Senseny Road with the east Corporate Limits of the City of Winchester, Virginia, and extending eastward along Senseny Road to the intersection of State Route 656, and having a width of one thousand (1000) feet on each side of the Senseny Road. The reason for this request is that this area is principally residential and large sums of money have been spent on residences, and it is the desire of the undersigned property owners to continue it as a residential area of Frederick County, Virginia. X X6. ILI- 1' L i i '40. the undersigneo, property owners and residents of tateliaute 657, Frefaerick County, Virginia. hereby petition the 1--canning Board and the Board of qupervisors of ,Frederick county, Virginia, to zone for residontia,l purposes eniy can area and saetion of the said -jenseny Road described and buundeb las follows: �,wwmenting at the intersection of thv . ansany Road with ;the east Corposato Liir-Lts of the wity of Winchester, Virginia, and extending eastward along Senseny road to tho intersection of Mate I uuU 646# and havinj a width of one tbousand (1000) feet on each i%idv of thu Sons€rny Road. They reason for Uis request is that this area is �rinc.ipally residential and large sums of money have been spent on 'residences, and it is they desire of the u:vi ersigned property L"ners to continue it As a .residential Area of ix*der ck Lounty, Ze — OV f °aZ' itil ! C �" I We, the undersigned, property owners and residents of Senseny Road, StateRoute 657, Frederick County, Virginia, hereby petition the planning Board anii the Board, of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, to zone for residential purposes only an area and section of the said Senseny Road described and bounded as follows: Commencing at the intersection of the Senseny Road with the east Corporate Limits of the City of Winchester, Virginia, and extending eastward along Senseny Road to -the intersection of State Route 656, and having a width of one t}iousand (1000) feet on each side of the Senseny Road. The reason for this .-equest is that this area is principally residential and large sums of money have been spent on residences, and it is the desire of the undersigned property owners to continue it as a residential area of Frederick County, Virginia. -�I • PETITION We, the undersigned property oimers and residents of the Senseny Road, in Frederick County, Virginia, hereby petition the Planning Hoard of the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, as follows: tTHEREAS, a Petition has been recently circulated and presented to the Board by persons representing themselves as residents ,of the Senseny Road in the area bounded by the -Anchester City limits and the intersection of State Route # 656; and, WHEREAS, the aforesaid Petition requested residential zoning along said road for a v,-idth of 1000 feet within the boundaries set out above; and, YEEREAS, the undersigned believe that the subject area is not at this time ready for zoning, due to the fact that much of the area is not yet developed and has not become exclusive residential. THEREFORE, the following residents and pronerty o-r;ners of the aforesaid area, have signed their names herewith, TVITIO-11, the pro-,--erty ammm and retddtmts Of th* S�swW Road# it', Frodcrick County# Vircirdal hereby mtition the IAMdM Board of thc, of sunp-m,i.sors of Frcderick "cunkyrs Virgini% &0 fOUOM: a patition has been roccritly clxcul.at*d OrA Pre&mtcd to the '13oaTd by P-TOOng rellrOlm"Un-' VIC.M.0,01VOS as residents of Ulo SOiftrrj ROM Ir �,he area bomAed by tho inches% r A I-Imits aW Vle tItOrsOctiOP vffll,,W-A,bjp t1we aforesaid v*titior requested maidor vial -"Oni ajor,`; 1--,A for Q rl(ft of 10-0 2crA VLthin the boxvidaAes �—t (TIt d)ml wd# nPrizry --ndcralf-TiO bv-lAMVe th&t thq ftbject ama Is not ,l the — at tim ri'ady for zov.1jIlE Xch -4 T ,, d!lc to the fact that m of '.hie area I no` y&, dmelored wrl ha n not tOOnInt O'Ket"RIVO rPfid"nt" iH N et'ne follwro rr-gi&mtn alid " x0rofty OMOM 04r afor"add amq hm njmed their rmw herevdthe A o7 AX - A I ILI ie L I ITION ;Te, tiir- vndersigned prenerty o-�nnrs avid rrAdca.to of the Sensen�) Road, in FreAnljCk GcO.untyf �lir� 1."h F�,_ liernby pc -tits on the PIA n IA" Board of the Board of S` jperv-.isors of ir--clerick Cauntyi Virgviia, as follows: i�,'R'A;-I a Petition- hae bin r-�^�-nt» tly circulated and .-n ,n'tnd to the Board by p(.rso.lS; thr:nRe?.ves as residents of the Sinnseny }joad it the area bowidod by the - jincheet= City 1,.rnits and the intersection of State Rcu -e V 656; and! mILKIASO the aaoresard Petition requested resiftiti-al zonis,.g along said rood kor a -�idth ci 10()0 feet within Vie boundaries aot out above; and., '+ii FAS, the ILndersi;-ne�d believe that tb sui�ject area is not at this time ready for zLm: i,q due to the fact t'ha-t muc,: of the area is not Jet, developed and has not become exclusive residr:ntial. T;' the follotinp residents and 7rO-')Ort; O-v vrs of ahe afor said aroa, have signed their names herewith. 14 FREDERICK COUNTY ORDINANCE NOTICE The Board of Supervisors have adopted at their Regular July, 1956, Meeting, on first and second reading the following changes in the Land Subdivision Ordinance as outlined below: 1. Add a section to be known as Section 2.1 requiring streets to be developed to property lines —restricting c,41 de —eoiporate surety for street bonds, streets to tie in with ose in other subdivisions. 2. Add tion to be knoXrnce. Section 2.2; Exempting ,streets and 9�IN i Back Creekinesboro Districts from requireme ,pS of d Subdivision 2. Add Section to be known as ' Section 9.1 requiring deed of dedication to be submitted for approval along with the plat. A plan to be filed in office of Commissioner of Revenue. !. Add section to be known as Section 9.2. All plats and deeds of dedication to be submitted at least 30 days before ap- proval. 5. Add a section to be known as Section 11.1, not more than two dwellings on any parcel of land unless each additional dwelling be 1000 feet from all others; unless plat and deed of dedication appro%k-d by Board of Supervisors. C. M. ROSENBERGER, Chairman LEE N. WVHITACRE, Clerk HSIDE MEMBERS of the He said "If there is a blanket lion said following rester- of col , moist air below warns dry s n,eeting that no com I• _ air, 1. e the reported fog bank, e is possible this base f the i ha beams would bounce off Gray Alan. oven it as .hough it were R mirror... mission niemb rs said "a cob I su ha a n ay ghat Radio waves re e sent rise is possib by etaini on% iii refle t back wheneve commission's 11 pro •am an they 4trike an object. r tionally gr nting .°w it rings" the Rut ority sked b le governor in he no integra an program he outlin . I There i ire, go (Iindi ations followin fl-g that assi ment plan porters are ctg]1 in LhZ: aiajvr-' its on thei rnmm,c.t. - Stanley sRi 71�= end to th_ssion of 'I une zivenes Aug. Fered by th o�th the ehce tthe ianley also . ai ie would ask amendment to the Appropri- ns Act authorizing the gover- to withhold certain state col money from communities integrate their schoole T11, AYDR A DORIA'S skip. Per, C pG. Pie Calamai, who ar. rived lhst nig with many other survivoks. rem ined silent on all of thA n...,.a:..�_ I��uy ocher comment from ship's crewmen wac a ska�F- t by or,e that he saw the ves. en I. ter tin operation af.the_tolls '-rl, 1,137 of the Andrea Do- ,ma"ier a's- passeltger lead been brought ew York by other ships. Of hospitals. Thirty. e ers ha ment. left after treat- _ =+ir reportelt•death toll was reduced from 'seven to six To- day when a 14-year-old girl thought to have perished ar- rived on a rescue ship. s store r• wl7. COUNTY ORDINANCE An ordinance to abolish the Finance Board passed Its first and second reading on the 14th day of May, 1956: and it 'is ordered that the public hearing be held at 2:00 P. M. in, the Supervisors' Room in the Frederick County Office Boild�ng on the 9th day of July, 1956, for its Third and fina! consideration and adoption. C. M. ROSENBERGER, Chairman LEE N. tVHITACRE, Clerk Q sept.7tr, 1056 Board of Supewv:Al.soi,s# Fredcrl.dk Gour ty, Vao d en tl emen s - The Rovisin-ii of the `Nb-Division Or&!naroe as prapoged and pas sea at your .Slily lnneetin � first, ani-jecand reading wilj in our opinion not unly taperate against lani o"'tners but will retard derelo,)e^iemts th!dang4 extra; -md costs, congecf1ent,ly red ce building oi,erations with. subse-quent loss to the Gonnty :in tom:.►►s. nep ;tie unalerGi ;nevi land oimors, builders and. developers, tiler efare, -ueg of yni, rot to pasF tt!e ya.ia pponos°ri! revision. Respectfully, H end: el Henry li'Larvin 1' eaver Dentzel Eolen Frank Clevenger Barry Akins Leanord ao ;ers iy th el i chn son its.ssell. Patterson ►t o y i(II do 1 ph Vance ,'ihittaRer Clintctin Ltitter �� u Hti�DT MA IV February 8, 1957. We, the undersigned property owners, in zoned area B hereby petition the Board against granting a permit to James Pappas for the erection of a drug store and restaurant. We want the Ordiance to remain as originally adopted. r O" t'z 400L . February 8, 1957. !°'e, the undersigned property ov.mers, in zoned area B hereby petition the Board against granting a permit to James Pappas for the erection of a drug store and restaurant. Ile want the Ordiance to remain as originally adoptedd.- We the undersigned residents of the Buffolic Road, of the Frederick County Area, hereby oppose and protest the zoning of the Buffolic Road area by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors: v mot/ PAP Pal r Jw. r - � P v► �j . .. e.E .. ,........w9i�a��•e3airi`i�ll(.s�,�:i:. � F z}`T� - '�yr�� - R � rz- f ! v .,+=hY-,111•---��.-�.....•sK+.�+.'w-..._. - 2. fA �n3 -�Z! s,.� :t� r t .r y I • ",+'+si�gtiGti3lt,`!!`.�St�f°4 "``^`.,,,�''�+�� "mot (�� 5--ly �lv ,:; r z� 4tn w 4­4 I y 0 y -Al C'n nit- �' ' Q�� U.S. R 0 V 'e, .��r .' � ,: J�k,,•'J��cf�•'Y,'�'�:�i�`�C�...�:,,�n i.�, s'YN�kCb'rfM � t�� �� / � � �� ; � ��'.� o . � �� r,, �� � �„ '� ,; �-: �i /"w } a ,�y�4: � t •�, � " .. �F! ,:� _ ,,�. �.,•R.'x Z'ts"- 'r� r+ '�ih �D 'a w�-.n �r few �;t r-' �� �' � �� . � Cj Y. - - ` _t ` - � �. 1 �- _ __ . W. & S. R R R-o- W G e/A N390 54' E-4 91. 75' O ' O [°N oN 0 52��OQ3o [a0 Q N z � 3 F T. G. ADAMS 0 LOT n 0 I N o t/I W L0 Z o[a N �t eEG i I � IRON PI 2 00 1 00 52 J" v S. Y 0 _0 tD S � 0 O j a� s ID ip0`A P J PLL The above Plat in a Survey of the Remaining Portion of the Clyde Logan - Lupton Tract. The said Improved Land fronts the western highway boundary line of the Valley Pike - U- S. # 11, just south of Kernstown, in Shawnee District, Frederick County, Virginia: Beginning at an iron pin in the western highway boundary line of the Valley Pike, a corner to the T. G. Adams Lot, running with the two following lines of the said Lot N 510 25t 30" it - 225.00 ft. to an iron pin; thence S 200 041 30" W - 200.00 ft. to an iron pin in the northeastern line of the Esso Standard Oil Company Lot; thence with the said line N 510 251 30" W - 355.3G ft- to an iron pin in the southeastern R/W line of the W. & S. Rail- road; thence with the said line N 390 54t E - 491.75 ft. to an iron pin corner to the Himelright Lot: thence with the southern line of the said Lot S 690 W 30" E - 383.60 ft. to an iron pin corner in the western high- way boundary line; thence with the said line S 20 041 30" W - " 1 ft- tothe bagiriZfiIlgo' LEA A. EBERT, Containing - - 7.15 Acres. Certified Land Surveyor, Surveyed - - - ,TU1Y 23, 1962• Comn. of Virginia # 484- BRAY ROBINSON. JR- gpg SOUTH STEWART STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA S NADY eL M R0q 4 0, D� R S 55. JO R-0- T 651 / 723 05RpN P 74. S S� i O Q 0d d O S s(P. ,s2 s d (P d s' N18059'E- 213' 2 z N 5Cf 06'W-100' N 39054' E-9 66.41' N 390 54' E- 1512. 22' `Iw°a SIN R.R. LAND �\ IRON PIN W . & S. RR. R- O- W J The above Plat is a Survey of the Ray Robinson Farm. The said Land fronts the western highway boundary line of the Valley Pike - U. S. 11, the southern boundary lines of the Kernstown Road - Rt. 652 and the southeastern boundary line of the Shady Elm Road - Rt. 651, at Kerns - town, in Shawnee District, Frederick County, Virginia. Beginning at an iron pin at the intersection of the western high- way boundary line of the Valley Pike with the southern boundary line of the Kernstown 'load, running with the two following boundary lines of the Kernstown Road N 800 W - 779.85 ft. to an iron pin; thence if 810 W - 54P.33 ft. to an iron pin at the intersection of the said boundary line with the southeastern boundary line of the Shady Elm Road; thence with the said southeastern boundary0 line S 55 101 W - 1723.05 ft. to an iron pin corner to the Tremonti Orchard Land; thence with the northeastern line of the said Land S 390 06l 30" E - 1809.4 ft. to an iron pin corner in the northwestern line of the Winchester & Strasburg Railroad Right - of - Way; thence with the said line 11 390 54' E - 1512.22 ft. to an iron pin corner to the Railroad Land; thence with the two f ollovring lines of the said Land N 500 06, W - 100 ft. to an iron pin; thence N 390 54- F - 966.41 ft. to an iron pin in the western highway boundary lino of the Valley Pike; thence with the said line N 180 59' E - 213 ft. to the beginning. __P_e 6 4_/- Containing - - 74.93 Acres. LEE A. FP.L'RT Certified Land Surveyor Surveyed - - - March 26, 1962 Comm. of Virginia # 484 + Alf ROBINSON, Jk. 309 SOUTH STEWART STREE 1 WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA m ��FrvSf Ypl(;L'1.� S -�,K � "� v4.aY TM.'.�y,..' � � i i! ,�• j y -zt a � s s"",t'YrFs,�`,, 4 yy � �� } oaf-"}--;► � . � b 3 ti � t c � 5 .� r � • � -''*'4st'Y' -i•T.r ��.� - �7 j�'�'Sw�. � It 3. ,'�" a,. 6 bf " 'r ' �w ZAP _ � rr4� p*. ,"ek � .}�" r ter. ✓p'. .fx e r 4i �T1 o ►fit `rt :.1.1. a oe i cap/Eh -.w2r� � �'atw �d — _ '„5-.- ��<�x.cE�Ys`:Ur•.d-;nS�1►t.��•rNA"�yj�.e.�-•y=_.:...'otl�."�`.` y a � y h-,r s -+r a �' ^*t4,\''� m •` ' e .z. •� - s r % a Aq .. *;orb: F��•.��'E tN '�.ak�s".F ,� :.G><t. ;�rv3T. ott. ZEV. RAW i t �': ' .. ._' �y-fi ems. �_�a• f_; ry bx t ��:fi t l s -•� N� ..;,-. .. , , - .aE.tyT �1\''j EA,� n, �♦°•. $ �\% '` �5 r! 4 t5Y ir1G, N SB-Zo•� �/ u/%lq r , Cl y1 dl •°o C.2`•`� OPf HE A-•-rov Am „ J?6.Yp+5�� a� i 8"M:p ISI Y= .vac �� S•da uic 1.,5.4� N�� �., y. fiV o a �`' N q� tS - " .. '^ Q�Q � � � �� � �C. <a f _ . /.yam•+ yet _ iri `� } CA, c � f1+PFROX:iti' �- 1r �vG.F` cct-7Y.0 k 5 i`�f 1��y/�4 �, t�-`;}►yf.•iSFs� .:.fhL"n,��lt�i ti�1: �.Y i!'i �: s� �C '^r,'` •• +� .: s. a�iI,I�.1'($I�dY'�a :`°�'yR�'' .e 'V _R - " ` r-�"��+ x i.t -f""� r � - s•7R..7+�^'�y'�""'�"Y'_" , '"�'��p•Rt� j, `,l y" � e�r''dtd r ?iJ j'yi!'M�`Y FCS r J• •��N{-'i S''a Y -,.h �7 T'�y�--h E.d S.c C':lx`LS� i � t •: t c a.•�. .� r't� ���j`�:. .. �} V ..Y:•iiyp ''_ y?1 r,1•,3k•�,�`t..v��•Y�, 'n, 7b/lfSW� ' •. t i Jpen°� C� ,r J�`fCE �, ��4t'� 1 N ^, _ Q N Q la _ - V? C. br 64 CL g i. .: .. - •Fr. z � ui r�4 1 a • at}� ro '• �, � �� ���� l } Sri � ^} , +•, utlrv4 • i , � 3 -' 24 CJ ; .G r; - n az J:a f tf; � ,, v _ � j��� t • F.. r, � c fin, � ;,r i _ f i•1-. t. v 'uz. 1 M ,{.,�f N.re'' - .�"y„Yg., a y S' A+• -. of 5 '.. r p l} t.. M i - FI It �• '-. y �'... �•,�i S M}W'•( o����M �,� a�.�IS; ��M:x, M Y��1"t-IVr �T `Le.w���w...� ... a.41�,i _I �u i. �...� L, '.+Y�; a. � t'.� '.. �y �l�ry ..._7w`..aMT.:- a��14`�� �.L..�._ ... . __ - .r •.. _ 1 C-1- zlt fl, C I n7E" r w >fe "5tA _"_ _-..�.:`nay. �n��e�'s..1�I}•�.S..a.i. �-...va.. i��_...�,a It -a�. .��. .+:1.�,..! �-..._ �.� :. �. :.: - .i c � j gar ;s� - �,u.,,_�,..... ���vi.� .r:s.r=. ter.''-�six•:ls :;i�.�`iit:; :. V o n k/ i1-70/7 W4'e�— �f� -.k Q' ` [[�T . �viY'. `��bS.;al'1 �-y _-..-� � Sir' ` • - J rS Q• f �v •3 - �nZd c o-k r r'Z- ` — �i, Maj. wi C Si3e ¢ Oa4' \ M -� lit "'-` $' r1a1i! .H�. ✓, 3w i y s 4 � .: �iz:.�.:+;lr�...t 'c � � ; '�?-i'F r��' x3.._�.�,s '�+rA� .�'v_��•:�cee.�i��t.: i.i'iex -..�-. _..:�r�.r.r {3 ,y, � At the Regular Meeting of the Board of Supervisor, heldi on the loth daft of December) 1956 Ray Rosenberger appeared before the Board and presented a petition, signed by a number of personsg requesting that the f9llowing territory' Located in Shawnee District, Frederick County) Virginia be zoned to wit; For new houses to be built on Bufflick road from route 522 to Buffalolick run and at a distance of 1000 feet on the north and south side of said Road and that new houses to cost not less than Eight Thousand Dollars and a mininum of 800 square footage on the first or ground floor and on motion of C. E. Garber and seconded by G. Grover Teets, the said request was referred to the planning Commission for their consideration. It is ordered that the Commission report their findings on or before the Regualr Meeting of the Board of Supervisors on January 149 1957. C. M. ROSENBERGER CHAIRMAN A COPY TESTE : LEE N. WHITACRE , CLERK