Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
11-16 Southern Hills Phase 2 - PIN 85D-1-1-95 - Revised Proffer - Opequon - Backfile
NOTES RECEIPT DATE ��a ► NO. 541078 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS qc)00 VY n-►r-) SGff Flooe F—Cl1Y.R aa031 �o�u- �-Qcn-E-ho��Sanc�l �lilr +T�' - FOR -%L�J ��r fl H 1 ) h2 nG _ - -� ACCOUNT HOW PAID LSD I AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH AMT. CHECK PAID (D BALANCE MONEY DVE ORDER 41001 rwDFcw w 81818 REZONING TRACKING SHEET Check List: Application Form Fee & Sign Deposit Proffer Statement Deed Impact Analysis Plat/Survey Adjoiner List Taxes Paid Statement A II �t IV Sys ID # File opened Reference manual updated/number assigned D-base updated Copy of adjoiner list given to staff member for %crification Color location maps ordered from Mapping Application Action Summary updated Planning Commission Meeting Board of Supervisors Meeting ACTION: W c (44:2,�y ACTION: 0 *� Signed copy of Resolution received from County Administrator and placed in Proffers Notebook together with proffers Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy to file and cc's Reference manual updated D-base updated Application Action Summary updated File given to Mapping to update zoning map Zoning map amended Proffers recorded COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 August 3, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Proposed Rezoning for Southern Hills — Phase II Property Identification Number (PIN): 8513-1-1-95 Dear Evan: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Southern Hills — Phase II property. This application seeks to rezone 40.36 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP Districts with revised proffers. Staffs review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Southern Frederick Area Plan. The site is within the limits of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis is shown at 3.22 units per acre. While slightly lower than shown within the plan, the density is relatively consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Monetary Contribution. Based on the changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the monetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation from FOPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance zones where this development is located, as well as data from Parks and Recreation. Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriff's Office on their respective service availabilities. Model figures for General Government and the Library are still appropriate. 3. Redline Proffers. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. 4. Proffer Statement. The introduction to the proffer does not reference the B2 zoning nor the acreage of B2/RP. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. Page 2 Mr. Evan Wyatt RC: Southern Hills August 3, 2016 5. Generalized Development I'lan. This rc-roning appears to omit the proffered generalized development plan that was proffered with the 2006 amendment. An updated GDP is recommended for this application that shows the property, proposed interparcel connections, road layout and the ROW dedication from proffer A2. 6. Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. 7. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 8. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Candice C. Perkins, AICP, CZA Assistant Director CEP/pd RMORDATION COVER SHRET TYPE OF INSTRUMENT: DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND RESERVATION i DATE OF INSTRUMENT: KIA WA 10 2016 NAMES OF GRANTORS: 1) ARCADIA COMMUWUMS. L.L-'C. 2) '1'RSTE. INC.. TRUSTEE NAMES OF GRANTEES: 1) ARCADIA COMMUNITIES. L.L.C. 2) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA COUNTY/MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHERE PROPERTY LOCATED: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: INSTRUMENTS WHERE PROPERTY SUBDNIDED/ACQUIRED: PLAT ATTACKED: TAX MAP PARCEL NOS.: TOWN FILE NO.: PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: BOX 99 FREDERICK COUNTY/OPEQUON DISTRICT BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF SOUTHERN .HILLS, PRASE 1, LOT 95 (TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95) AND RESIDUE TAX PARCEL NUMBER 85-A-138 INST. NO. 060011588 (SOUTI-IERN HILLS PLAT) INST. NO.060013883 (SOUTHERN HILL DEED) INST. NO. 120013745 (PARCEL 138) INST. NO. 120013746 (LOT 95) INST. NO. 150010366 (NA,ME CiIANGP/CONVFRSION) PLAT NUMBER 3126 AND 0517B, PREPARED BY GREENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. 85-A-138 (RESIDUE PARCEL) 85D-1-1-95 (LOT 95) BLA 16-03 CULBERT & SCHMITT, PLLC 30-C Catoctin Circle, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 (12407.007)'TED I c=i 0 TIES DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND RESERVATION (the. "Deed") is made this 16+ day of 2016, by and between ARCADI . COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, formerly known as Arcadia Communities, Inc. (referred to herein as the "Owner"), Grantor and Grantee; TBSTE, INC., TRUSTEE (referred to herein as the "Trustee"), Grantor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, Beneficiary (referred to herein as the "Beneficiary"); and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINI a body corporate and politic (referred to herein as the "County"), Grantee. RECITALS: A. The Owner is the owner and proprietor of certain real property located in Frederick County, Virginia, identified as Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138 ("Parcel 13811) and Tax Map Parcel 85D- 1-1-95 ("Lot 95) (Parcel 138 and Lot 95 arc sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Property"), as shown on that certain plat number 3126 and 051713, dated February 23, 2016, entitled "Boundary Line Adjustment on the Land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., (Tax Parcels 85-A-138 and 85D-1-195)," and prepared by Grecnway Engineering, Inc., of Winchester, Virginia, certified land surveyors (the "Plat"), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; the Owner having acquired the Property by deeds recorded as Instrument Number 120013745 and Instrument Number 120013746, and as modified by namc conversion recorded as Instrument Number 150010366, among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia (the "Land Records"). 4 —o CD 0 0 ry CD d CD B. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to reconfigure and adjust the common boundary lines between Parcel 138 and Lot 95, said boundary line adjustment being more particularly shown on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. C.. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to create and establish a reservation for future public street dedication over and across the Property, in the location more particularly bounded and described on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. D. The Property is subject to the lien of a certain Credit Line Deal of Trust With Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Piling, dated October20, 2015, and recorded as IDstrunientNumber 150010369, among the LwndRecord, as maybeamended, modified, supplemented and/or restated from time to time (the "Deed of Trust"), wherein the Property. was conveyed unto the Trustee, in trust, to secure a certain indebtedness, as more specifically set forth therein. BOUNDARY LING AD.IUSTAIENT OF PARCEL 138 AND LOT 95 NOW TI-YFRPPORP. WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($ 1.00), cash in band paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Owner, as the owner of Parcel 138 and Lot 95, does hereby reconfigure and adjust the common boundary lines between Parcel 138 and Lot 95, in the locations shown on the Plat as "Property Line Hereby Created" and deleting the existing boundary lines in the locations shown oil the Plat as "Property Lines Hereby Vacated," thereby creating New Parcel 138 (New TM 85-A-138), containing of approximately 11.8556 Acres of land, and New Lot 95 (New TM 85D-1-1-95), containing of approximately 40.3609 Acres of land, as more particularly bounded and described on the Plat. The lots and parcels hereby reconfigure and 3 CD 0 0 -- boundary lure adjusted are adjacent to and contiguous with one another, having been acquired by the Owner, as set forth hereinahove. The Property hereby boundary line adjusted, as shown on the Plat, is subject to all recorded casements, conditions, restrictions, and agreements drat lawfully apply to all or anysuch part thereof. PUBLIC STREET RESERVATION TIIIS DEED FURTHER WiTNESSE fH, that in consideration of the promises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are.hereby acknowledged, the Owner hereby reserves for future public street dedication to the County and/or fire Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") that certain area shown and depicted on the aforesaid Plat as "Reservation For 100 Foot Wide Future Right- of-way (the "Reservation Area"), This reservation for future public street dedication is hereby limited to a period of eighty-nine (89) years from the data of recordation of this instrument. The Owner, its successors and assigns in interest, shall dedicate to the County and/or VDOT for public street purposes, at no public cost to the giaatee thereof, all orportions of the Reservation Area upon the request of the County and/or VDOT at any time during said eighty-nine (89) year period. TRUSTEE'S CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION THIS DELI) FUIXlllilZ WfiN1:SSE'I'lI, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand.paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Trustee, as authorized to act by the Beneficiary, as shown by its execution hereto, does hereby (i) consent to the boundary line adjustment of the Property, as shown on the Plat and (ii) subordinate the said lien of the Deed of Trust to the foregoing reservation for public street purposes. 4 i i i i 0 CD 0 cn STATUTORY COMPLIANCE, The platting of the land and adjustment of the boundary lines provided by this instrument is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the Owner and the Trustee, and in accordance with the provisions of Virginia Code Section 15.2-2264, and applicable regulations of Frederick County, Virginia, as evidenced by tie approval of said boundary line adjustment by authorized officials of Frederick County, Virginia, as noted on the attached Plat. MISCELLANEOUS IIeadings used in this Deed are 1br convenience purposes only and are not intended to affect the express terms herein set forth. IN WITNESS WI-IEREOF, the parties have caused this Deed of to be executed, under seat, by their duly authorized representatives. FURTHER WITNESS the following signatures and seals. [SIGNATURES ARE ON SUCCEEDING PAGES] 5 CD 0 0 M ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager i106�I r��. L� STATE/COMMONWEAL•1'H OF V I2b 1 f\J 1A CITY/COUNTY OF FA I ZF—n 1L to wit: I, the }}urdersigu Notary Public, in and for th�u�ris�,d'Gtio aforesaid, do here ycertify that 1� A• LI�QJ i as_ �: I n of Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., as Manager of VM Holdings III, L.L.C., as Managing Member of VMB Investments, L.L.C., as Sole Member and Manager of ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally achowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this I UP -bay of We CJ-1 , 2016. My commission expires: t�/L C� 1\ ry ublic 12..�3 i )i� /y IG Notary Registration No.: LI"! 0V LNoluy PublAURA L. ic Commomnatth of Virglnla 7049698 i My Commission ExPlres Dec 31, 2018 E 6 TRUSTEE: TRSTE, INC., TRUSTEE, a Virginia corporation By: (SEAL) Name: Title: President STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF �05 CITY/COUNTY OF to wit: I, the unde i med Notary Public, in and for the jufl did aforesaid, do berehy certify that -� Ml�-6 . as V • bf TRSTE, INC., TRUSTEE, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the sane In my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my)mud and seal this _1,0� da of 12016. My commission expires: ,— t. „ N aryP lio Notary Registration No,:_I M "�%~ 3 7 —v c� CD 0 0 �, --c U- Q CD O DD BENEFICIARY: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, Benoficimy By:_ (SEAL) Name: STATTJCOMMONWEAum QF CITY/COUNTY OF. J) (� 1511-T, „lo wit I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for tbo jurisdicti aforesaid, do hereby eortify that — _'RL��� as V. i" of WELLS FAR '0 BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Beneficiary, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally ncknowledged the same in ray jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this _[ IAA` day of MG✓'&+\ , 2016. My commission expires: Notary Pu c Notary Registration No.:_jo�94�77— 3 BOUNWY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ABC" COMMEA " C. MAX PARCER B 8 -A-W and O%WM AIAG/STER14L DWRICT, FR00ICK COUNTY, VIRGINL4 FEBRUARY 23, 2016 VICINITY MAP l F 1' = 1200' q STICKLEY DR. Ay i P DS�eQr' EAL AND \\� a PLENTY LN. TOWN RUN LANE — RTE. 1012 Stephens City 1--81 1 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS, AND TRUSTEES, IF Y. IW(A01-4P-ONM(JNi11r S,LLtC,6V,�inlot 1�``miieGl 110.bi II Cornpwln 'Lo!VM3 Ijj dL�f7�,1&J-IS -L.L -C. I C� DeICu �'( 1iMti4( 1iGb(i11y Cam r,% I its 5c�w- tLu 0ndMCln6ffr,3y 4m iiok ,mc-,S fiC1L_-L-C, 1261IJ1A,I in�U nlrA(f ift11 (C,,O�MPAIJy,`ii1S ANACI1W6, NEM6tF ,6y: VAIN M(-T12L P + AN �1ALA&SOc,W�-E5,1N R`I�2G,,+�iftCv2.Pti2�TlorJi I�M�NAC�C-l2, 'j3"�; `'w"' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY / COUNTY of FAIEfA , To w : 6rn(u IN A . 0-yA<s 1 G )6—r- )(0cl U THE FOREGOING OWNERS CER77RCATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED LAURA L. LYDIC RFFOPF OF TH1S 1 h ndY nr- k .IA 0 �n 1In Notary Public ORIGINAL T.M. 85—A-13B 51,9269 ACRES ORIGINAL T.M. 850-1-1-95 0.2896 ACRES (LOT 95 SOUTHERN HILLS PH. I) TOTAL 52,2165 ACRES NEW TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 11.8556 ACRES NEW TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95 40,3609 ACRES TOTAL 52.2165 ACRES = CENTERLINE R/W = RIGHT—OF—WAY A = EXISTING ESMT. = EASEMENT INST. No. = INSTRUMENT NUMBER TM = TAX MAP BRL = BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE PER ZONING ORDINANCE NOTES: 1. THE BOUNDARY AND ACREAGE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON PLATS OF RECORD AND FIELD SURVEYS PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM. 2. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN! J. TITLE TO TAX PARCEL 85—A-13B IS VESTED IN ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 120013745. 77TLE TO TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95 (LOT 95 OF SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION PHASE I AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 060011588) IS VESTED IN ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 120013746. ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. IS SUCCESSOR TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, INC. BY CONVERSION AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 150010366. 4. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON LIES WITHIN ZONE A: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDA77ON BY THE l% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED AND ZONE X.• AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.29 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN PER N.F.I.P. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 51069C0330D, EFTEC77VE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. THE APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SAID ZONE A ARE DEPICTED HEREON AS DETERMINED BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING OF THE REFERENCED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. 5. TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 HAS THE REMAINS OF A HOUSE, A BARN AND VARIOUS FARM RELATED OUT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES. ALL OF THESE ARE ABANDONED AND IN RUINS. 6. BUILDING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS FOR B2 ZONING ARE. FRONT — 50' ON PRIMARY/A7E'RIAL HIGHWAYS, 35' ON COLLECTOR/MINOR STREETS SIDE & REAR — NONE BUILDING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS FOR RP ZONING ARE BASED ON THE CLASSIRCA77ON OF HOUSING TYPES WHICH ARE DETERMINED DURING SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THE ENTIRETY OF THE 100 FOOT RESERVATION FOR FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY IS BUILDING RESTRICTED. Z ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE TO THE LAND RECORDS OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFFICE. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF �,ALTH 0 �.C. ARCAD14 COMMMES, L (TAX PARCELS 85-A-W and &AV-1-1-915) OPEQUON MG/STERAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGINA c� . NES . H R. SCALE: N/A DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2016 Lic. No. 1837 GRE,r,NWAYENGTNEERING, TAIc. ��, %��r� �0� 151 Windy Hill Lane �� SURD FND ,9„ Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 GREE WAY FAX: (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 2 OF 7 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com BLA 16-03 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N 2732'43" E 10.05' L2 N 62'27'17" W 50.00' L3 N 59'13'09" W 14223' L4 N 61'10'50" W 145.04' L5 N 27'32 43" E 95.43' L6 N 29'00'04" E 164.02' L7 S 6.1'09'46" E 15.28' L8 N 28'50'14" E 37.14' L9 S 35'39'41 "• W 129.60' L10 S 47*23'14" W 111.61' Lll S 062159" W 148.29' L 12 S 06'2159" W 399.78' L 13 S 19'38 51 " E 235.49' L14 S 00'13'48" W 269.38' L 15 S 02*53'17" E 75.12' L 16 S 08'45'49" W 280.04 L 17 S 03'25 04" E 104,05 ' L 18 S 88'35'13" W 339.65' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH TANGENT Cl 2824.79' 102.03' 2'04 10" N 29'52'19" E 102.03' 51.02' C2 2450.00' 603.61' 14'06'58" N 70'0358" W 602.09' 303.34' C3 2550.00' 639.66' 14 22 21 " S 70' l 1 ' 39" E 637.98' 321.52' BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCALXA COMGN(I W ES, L.L.C. CTAX PAI4CaS 85 A-M and BSD-f-1-9�5I OPEQUON MGISTERW DISTRICT, fREDERICK COUNTY, WRGIN14 SCALE: N/A 1 DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane mm 1971 Winchesler, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 GREE WAY PAX- (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING ivww.greenwayeng.com p,LTH 0, ERNEST S. H MTH Lic. No.//1837 3126 SHEET' 3 OF 7 BLA 16-03 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 96 / 14 %2 �100.62' N1` -PRI0PER/Y LM/E hER£BY CREATED 1 c, t I N i 1' t1 r R£5ERYATION FOR 100 FOOT WIDE " FUTURE RaW R1CHT-OF-WAY ORIGINAL TM 85-A-136 NEW TAM 85D-1-1-95 40.3609 ACRES ZONE RP & B2 U .. 20' ARA OM E ESMT. OCT. No. 0600114 KSTCHESTFR DR. 50'RIV \ EX. TEAAPORARY C1K-DE--S4C ESMT. NYST. hb. 060011568"� D( 20' S4h9TARY SEAR E-WT. ST No. 0600115M N 2T32"43' E 52Z 10' V:-� ou N rIL1 sh N PROPERLY LMS SUUI o�n.,�,�,• , FIETifBY VACATED LOT 4 588 95 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 554.63�-----_- 94 93 _92 91 90 89 28-49'10' E 801.32 — — - — L5— - —- —— ORIGINAL TOWN RUN LANE - STATE RTE 1012 TM 85D-1-1-95 ✓ARM&E *VM R/W BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCAD14 GO&UAWT]E.S, L X (TAX PARCELS 85-A-138 and &V-1-1-915) OPEOUON MGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERrX COUNTY, KRGM SCALE.- 1 --200' WE- FEBRUARY 2J 2016 GREENWA Y ENGINEERING, LNG 151 Windy Hill Lane WinchesW KTinia 22602 Tekphone. (540) 662-4185 FREE AY FAX (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com SH a Lic. No!1837 0517E SHEET 4 OF 7 BLA 16- 03 0 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 9 1�` $ 0 1��10�00�11 yo �•� � � � � la's P� TM 85-A-141 FREDERICK-WINCHESTER % o SERVICE AUTHORITY DR 608 PG 671 i �y2 100,62' IM 65-A-142A L9 4 10 o TOWN 0 NEW TY 85D-1-1-95 STEPHENS cm \ 1 0 0 40.3609 ACRES DB 700 PG 273 / m1m ZONE RP & 82 PROPERTY LINE HEREBY CREATED NE4W 'TM 85 A-138 I N i 1.8556 ACRES I I RESERVATION FOR ZONE 82 loFOOT WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY r.. I ORIGINAL TM 85-A-138 N o o EX. 20' SANITARY SEWER ESMT . `7 INST. No. 060011567 II o 2! 1� co I a w ++ I K3 I ,� . EX. 20' to IDRAINAGE ESMT. . INST No. 060011588 PROPERTY LINES 100.05' HEREBY VACATED 95T L8 24� ¢�' 554_63' 2849'10" E 801.321— - — - — L5 TOWN RUN .LANE — STATE RTE. 1012 ORIGINAL VARNBLE WIDTH R/W TM 85D-1-1-95 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF �pyTH pl,�j ARCAM COMMAIVES, L.L.C. (TAX PARCELS 85 A-M and OPEQUON MGISTERWL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINW u ERNS , H SCALE. l "=200' DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2016 Llc. N . 1 37 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Flill Lane rNn Winchester, ��xrinia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 G RE E WAY RAX.• (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 5 OF 7 RNGINRRRING www.greenivayeng.con BLA 16-03 O 0 EXISTING 60 0 60 EASEMENT S 57'27 06 E 1069.12' DETAILS f f GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) I G- I EX. WATERLINE ESMT o o INST. No. 060011587 $, cc, L7 EX. 20' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 I� � J �} EX. 4' PERPETUAL ROADWAY ESMT INST. No. 060011587 O 2 o EX. WATERLINE ESMT EX. 20' SANITARY INST. No..060011587 SEWER ESMT. I C I ' INST. No. 060011587 NZ I� �I IQ IN I I EX. 11 ' PRIVATE WTAR Y SEWER FORCE MAIN ESMT. INST. No. 020017766 I i ( N 63'00'29" W 495.59' — — BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIIA COMW M77E3, L.L.C. LTH p �,�+ F P 0 M PARCELS 85 A-M and OPEQUON YGISIERfAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGIMIA U EST S. TH Llc. N . 1837 `9itt URv�'�o SCALE. 1 "=200' 7 DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 PAID 1971 GREE WAY GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 1S1 Windy Hill Lane LVinchesfer, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 ram• (540) 722-9528 26 SHEET 6 OF 7 318LA ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng'com 16-03 EXISTING N 63.00 29 W 495,59' - - EASEMENT DETAILS MATCH TO SHEET 6 I 60 0 60 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) o I ti .I I EX. 11 ' PRIVATE SA/TARY SEWER FORCE MAIN ESMT. INST. No. 020017766 y o EX 4' PERPETUAL y Yy 'I ROADWAY ESMT o INST. No. 060011587 I. . OII ala EX WATERLINE ESMT. INST. No, 060011587 I 0 N Ip I I I EX. STORM 4 DRAIkAGE ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 I EX. 20' SANITARY EX. 20' SEWER ESMT. I DRAINAGE ESMT. INST. No. 060011588 INST. No. 06001158E ° L4 LOT 95 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF �AY'TIi OF1, ARCADIA CDA UME3, L.L.C. MAX PARMS 85 A--M aW &Z-1-1-9 ) OPEQUON MGISTERLAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINIA ES S. H y Llc, N . 1837 SCALE: 1'=200' 1 DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane SURv� i+rm Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 3126 SHEET 7 OF 7 MiE WAY Tf1X.• (540) 722-9528 . ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com BLA 16-03 0 D D n .5 .. ._. _ _. .. ... _ ....._. .. .. _ .. .. _.- ..�_ .� ... ... ... .......... •C-iJ C) Q I I 7 i I V1KUINIA: Fk--DERfCKCOUNTY.SC-1. This instrument of writing was produced to me on and with certificate acknowledgement thereto annexed iwas admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of $ N JA , and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. Clerk j I t i i i I :Jntrtled Page littps://taxes.co.fi-ederick.va.us/applications/TR_payTaxcs/REDetaii.aspx I,cJciirl. liun,c Frederick County Vl rb i I i Ll LrFE ar THE T'aP Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous 2016 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticketdt RE2016 110610001 Frequency 1 supplementll 0 Name ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC Map# 85 A 138 Account// 8025340 Name 2 Bill Date 06/05/2016 Acreage 51.920 Address 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 Due Dale 06/06/2016 Improvements $153,000.00 FAIRFAX VA Desc 51.92 ACRES Land Value $1,547,300.00 Land Use $0.00 Zip 22031 3907 Minerals $0.00 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Last Transaction Date 06/02/2016 Current Payment Shdus Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty Interest Balance Due $S,100.90 ($5,100.90) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 'Fransaetion IIis(ory Date Type 11•ansactiontl Amount Balance 6/5/2016 Charge 0 $5,100.90 S5,100.90 6/2/2016 Principal Paid 74 ($5,10090) $0.00 Previous of 1 6/30/2016 10:06 AM Jntitted Pagc https:Htaxes.co.frederiek.va.us/applications/TR_payTaxes/REDctai1.aspx I wdciict. tlunu Frederick County Vi rb 1 rl M LIFE 6r-M Ton Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Properly Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous 2016 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticket/1 RE2016 / 11470001 Frequency 1 Supplementll 0 Name ARCADIA COFIl4UNMES LLC Mapll 85D 1 1 95 Accountll 8045139 Name 2 Bill Date 06/05/2016 Acreage Address 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 Due Date 06/CG/2016 Inprovemen(s FAIRFAX VA Desc SOUTHERN HILLS L95P1 Land Value Zip 22031 3907 Penally Paid Original Bill $165.00 i0.00 Interest Paid $o.00 Current Payment Status Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty ($165.00) $0.00 $0.00 Land Use Minemis Last Transaction Date 06/02/2016 0.280 $0.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Interest Balance Due $0.00 $O.GO Transaction Ilistory Date 'I)ype 'IYansactionll Amount 6/5/2016 Charge 0 $165.00 6/2/2016 Principal Paid 74 ($165.00) Previous Balance S 165.00 SO.00 of 1 6/30/2016 10:01 AM IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #851)- l -1-95 June 30, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com Greenway I?nginecring June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by the proffered rezoniIlg Of a 40.36±-acl-C Subject property owned by Arcadia COmI11LlmtiCS, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner"). The subject property is identified as Tax Map Parcel 8.51)-I-1-95, which is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (ROLIte 1012) approximately 0.6 miles SOLIth Of the Intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The subject property is split -zoned and is comprised of 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B-2, Business General District. The subject property is a component of a 105± acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01-01) and subSegUClltly rezoned as RP, Residential PCI'formance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre Subject properly to maintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District land area, and to modify the proffer statement t0 limit development of the 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District t0 a illaxllllum Of 130 single- family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' right-of-way area within the 2.57± acre B-2, Business General District portion of the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered under Rezoning Application #22- 06. Bask information Location: Fronting on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) Magisterial District: Tax Map Parcel Number Opequon District 85D-1-1-95 File #3126V Impact Analysis StatemenUFAW 2 Greenway Iingincering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities. L.L.C. Rezoning Current Zoning: I213, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Current Use: Undeveloped (Note: Single f imil�y detached residential lots platted and some lots developed in Southern Hills — Phase 1) Proposed Zoning: RP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Proposed Use: Single -Family Detached Residential Lots (RP District) Public Street Reservation Area (132 District) Total Rezoning Area: 40.36±-acres with revised proffers for the subject property COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Urban Development Area The Urban Development Area (UDA) defines the general area in which residential, commercial, llldUstrlal and illstitUtional land Use development is encouraged in the Collllty. The 40.36±-acre subject property is currently located within the UDA; therefore, expansion of the UDA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of single-family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the future extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Sewer and Water Service Area The Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) is generally consistent with the UDA, but also extends outside of the UDA to accommodate areas of' the County in which commercial and industrial land use development is only desired. The 40.36±-acre subject property is currently located within the SWSA; therefore, expansion of the SWSA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of single -Family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the future extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Comprehensive Plan Conformity The 40.36±-acre Subject property is located in the UDA and the SWSA and is within the study area boundary of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan is a large -area plan that IdelltifleS lalld LISCS, transportation networks, and other matters that are recommended for consideration for I'uture land use and development within this geographic area of the County. The 40.36±-acre subject property is identified for residential and bLISilICSS land use; therefore, the proposed RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, File 113126V Impact Analysis SlalemenUFAW 3 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities. L.L.C. Rezoning Business General District rezoning IS In conlormaIlce with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan TransportatioI] Mal) identifies a Ilew Illinor arterial road system that traverses the SubjCCt property. The alignment of the new illinor arterial road is located within the 13-2, Business General District portion Of the subject property, which has been identified as a public street reservation area; therefore, the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The 40.36±-acre Subject property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles Soutll of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). Access to the single-family detached residential lots will be provided along Town Run Lane and through a system Of public streets internal to the RP, Residential Performance District portion Of the Subject property. The single-family detached residential lots will not have access from the B-2, Business General District portion of the Subject property that has been established by deed as a Ilitlll'C public street reservation area. Flood Plains The 40.36±-acre subject property contains a small area Of floodplain within the B-2, Business General District portion OI the Subject property along the eastern property line that IS associated with Stephens Run. The Subject property is located within FEMA NFIP Map #51069C0330D, Effective Date September 2, 2009, and is primarily located within Flood Zone X with the exception o[ the small area of floodplain within the B-2, Business General District portion Of the subject property. The single-family detached residential lots proposed for Southern Hills — Phase 2 are located completely outside Of the floodplain limits. Wetlands The 40.36±-acre Subject property does not contain wetland areas as dei11onstrated oil the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map information from the Frederick County GIS Database. However, the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County On April 9, 2007 idcntil'ies delineated wetland areas along the SOLlthern boundary O1' the Subject property. The delineated wetland areas are located within the open space portion Of the subject property and will not be impacted by the developed of the single-family detached residential lots proposed l'Or Southern Hills — Phase 2. Soil Types The 40.36±-acre subject property contains three soil types as demonstrated by the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia and the Frederick County GIS Database. The following soil type is present on site: Idle 83126V Impact Analysis StatemenUFAW a (ireenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning 913: Clearbrook Channery Silt Loarns 2-7% slopes 32C: Blairton Silt Loams 7-15% slopes 41 C/D/E: Weikert-Berks Channery Silt Loams 7-65% slopes None of the soil types within the subject property are identified as a prime agricultural soil and all types have high shrink/swell properties. The 40.36±-acre subject property has similar soil conditions as Southern Hills — Phase 1, which has been developed with public streets and single-family detached residential lots. Other Environmental Features The 40.36±-acre subject property does not contain areas of' steep slope, lakes or ponds or natUral stormwater retention areas as defined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and as delineated on the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007. There are no known environmental features present that create development constraints for the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2. ADJOINING PROPERTIES Adjoining property zoning and present use: North: B-2, BUSiness General District South: RP, Residential Performance District East: RP, Residential Performance District West: RA, Rural Areas District TRANSPORTATION Use: Unimproved Use: Southern Hills — Phase 1 Use: Southern Hills — Phase I Use: Unimproved The 40.36±-acre Subject property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The subject property is generally identified as Southern ]-Tills — Phase 2 (the middle section of the Southern Hills Subdivision). Frederick County originally approved Rezoning Application #01-01, which established 1ZP, IZesidential Performance District zoning over the 105± acre parent tract that includes the 40.36± acre subject property. The approved Proffcr Statement for this rezoning required the 105± acre property to be developed as Single family lots and included several off -site transportation improvements. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained the single family lots within File 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/FAW 5 (ircenway I?ngineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning SOLlthern Hills - Phase I and modified the remainder of the project area to allow for 232 townhouse lots Within Southern Hills — Phase 2 and to allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of' the project (Southern Hills — Phase 3). The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning carried forward the transportation improvements from the Original proffers, restricted the Southern Hills - Phase 2 Land Bay to townhouse lots, and provided for a 100' right -of -Way area between the tOW1111OLises and the commercial land bay t0 accommodate the fUturC CXteilSloll of'South Warrior Drive t0 the 1LItUrC Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. The original property owner implemented the proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06. These transportation improvements are Identified oil the Transportation Proffer Compliance Map Exhibit and include the following: Coillpletioll Of the extension of Slickley Drive (Route 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). :- Installation of guardrail along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. Completion Of' new surface material overlay of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). The 40.36± acre Subject property is inclusive of the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Land Bay that is approved for 232 townhouse lots; as well as the 100' right-Ol-Way area t0 accommodate the 1UtUrC CXtCi1S1011 of SOLlth Warrior Drive. The Owner has reserved the 100' right-of-way area for lUtUrC pUbliC Street CICdICation to ensure this 1S available t0 Frederick COLInty and VDOT as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Proffer Statement. This public Street reservation is legally recorded by deed and plat as Instrument No. 160002930/0001, which is included as information in the proposed rezoning application. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maXilllLlln OI 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed traffic impacts associated with this rezoning request: EXISTING IMPACTS: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD PROPOSED IMPACTS: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD REDUCED IMPACT: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 505 VPD The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application has provided for the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for ILItUre public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT for the extension Of' South Warrior Drive as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Proffer Statement, and previOLIS development activities associated with Pile 113126V Impact Analysis StatemenUFAW 6 (ireenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning the Southern Hills — Phase 1 Land Bay have implemented all other transportation improvements. Additionally, the proposed rezoning application results in a redliCti011 Of 505 vehicles per clay that reduces impacts to the Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085) intersection. Therefore, the proposed rezoning application adegUately mitigates transportation impacts to Frederick County. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public sewer based on County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider of public sewer service within this area Of the CO1111ty and Currently has sewer infrastrUCtUre within SOLlthel-11 Hills — Phase I that includes gravity sewer lines, a pump station and a four -inch sewer force main that directs CIIIUent to a 15-inch sewer transmission lute to the Parkins Mill Treatment Facility (PMTF). The Frederick C011llty Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/day per residential connection is an appropriate CalCUlation for estimatiIlg the sewer demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed sewer demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of' 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand Is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/clay/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of- a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/clay/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of- 30,600 GPD of sewer demand front the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The sewer system design for SOLItlIffn Hills — Phase 2 will incorporate all oil -site gravity collection system that directs effluent from the single-family detached residential lots to the existing FCSA pU11111 station located immediately east of the subject property. The existing pump station was designed, approved and constructed as a 0.135 MGD facility. The projected sewer demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots within File #3126V Impact Analysis Statemen[J iAW 7 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Southern Hills — Phase 1 and the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is approximately 50%n of the design capacity of the existing FCSA pump station. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application can be accommodated by the existing FCSA sewer system infrastructure. WATER SUPPLY The 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public water based on County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider of public water service within this area of the Co1111ty and has all existing 12" water line located along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) that provides public water to the property. Additionally, a 12' water line and all 8" Water line have been constrUCted Withlll Southern Hills Phase I that extend to the Southern Hills — Phase 2 property. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/day per residential connection is an appropriate calculation for estimating the Water demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed Water demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development ol' 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the pr0,lected water demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maxilllUM of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected water demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 30,600 GPD of water demand from the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The water system design for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 single-family detached residential lots will expand on the existing water system that was developed for Southern Hills — Phase 1. This design will provide for Water I111C I001)111g t0 C11S11rC that adegUate water preSSllrC is available for residential service and for Dire flow. The projected water demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots Within Southern Hills — Phase I and the File 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/FAW 8 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning proposed single-larnily detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is a reduction of 30,600 GPD below the projected water needs for the subject property. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application Can be accommodated by FCSA and by the existing water System infrastrUCtUre. SITE DRAINAGE The 40.36±-acre Subject property has a drainage divide that directs drainage to the east and to the south to defined channels that flow into Stephens Run. The proposed single-family detached reSldelltlal lots will be developed as CUrb and gllttCl' streets and will incorporate stormwater management design that will include stornlwater detention ponds oil the eastern and SOLlthCrll portion OI' the Subject property On the upper Side of the Stephens Run drainage channels. Stormwater quality measures will be evaluated during the Subdivision Design Plan process and will be achieved through on -site quality IlleaSUreS of a combination of' on -Site quality measures and nutrient credits it' necessary. The Stornlwater quantity and quality measures will be designed in Conformance with all applicable state and local regulations; therefore, Site drainage and Stormwater management impacts to adjoining properties aIld the corm111.11lity will be adegUately Illitigated. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL The impact on solid waste disposal associated with the development of the 40.36± subject Site call be projected Iron] all average ailllllal residential COIISUIllpti011 of 5.4 CUbic yards per household (Civil Engineering Reference Manual, 4°i Edition). The Frederick County Public Works Department is responsible 17or solid waste disposal as the manager of the Regional Landfill Facility. Existing and proposed solid waste disposal demands for the 40.36± Subject Site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected Solid waste demand is as follows: AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 232 residential units AV = 1,253 Cu. Yd, at residential build -Out, Or 877 tolls/yr at build-OLlt PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow I'or the development of a maxinluln Of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the proJCcted solid waste demand is as follows: AV = .5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 CLI. Yd, x 130 residential units AV = 702 Cu. Yd. at residential build -Out, or 491 tons/yr at build -out File 113126V impact Analysis StatemenUFAW 9 (ireenway lingincering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities. L.L.C. Rezoning REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 386 tons/yr of solid waste demand front the SOLIthCrll Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill has a current remaining capacity of 13,100,000 cubic yards of air space. The projected buildout of Southern Hills — Phase 2 will generate approximately 491 tons of solid waste allllllally on average. This represents a 0.24% increase in the annual solid waste received by the Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill, Which Currently averages 200,000 tons per year and is a reduction from the anllLlal solid Waste disposal that W011ld Otherwise 0CCL11- Milder the existiIlg residential land Use plan. The Regional Landfill has adegLlate capacity t0 accommodate the solid Waste impacts associated with this proposal. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify Structures deemed to be historically significant on the 40.36±-acre subject property, nor does the survey identify properties within proximity of this site that are deemed potentially significant. The closest potentially significant structure is identified as the WisC-RitenOur House (34-1209), which is located approximately 0.3 miles southeast of the subject property. The National Park Service Study of' Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify the 40.36±-acre subject property as being located within defined Civil War Battlefield study area boundaries. Therefore, the proposed single-family detached residential lot development plan for the subject property Will not create negative impacts associated With historic I-CSOLII-CCS. COMMUNITY FACILITY IMPACT'S The 40.36±-acre subject property is a component of a 105± acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01- 01) and subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). Rezoning Application #22-06 was approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots, while the proposed Rezoning Application WOuld reduce this impact through the proffered maximum development of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Rezoning Application #22-06 provides for a total monetary contribution value of $1,139,120.00 to offset impacts to community facilities. The proposed Rezoning Application maintains this same level Of funding to Offset impacts t0 C0111111L111ity facilities even though this proposal demonstrates a reduction of more than 100 residential lots. The Owner's Proffer Statement regllil-CS the 111CILIS1011 of it ]narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary Contribution for each Single -faintly detached residential lot that File #3126V Impact Analysis Statement/I'.AW 10 Greenway Engineering June 30, 201E Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning equates to the total monetary contrlbUti0I1 of $1 ,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. This approach ensures that the Owner Will provide the same level of funding to offset impacts to community facilities regardless if' the total number of lots falls below the maximum 130 single-family detached residential lots identified in the proposed Proffer Statement. The school student generation impact to Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) is calculated by the County Development Impact Model (CDIM). Currently, the CDIM projects single-family detached residential land use at 0.40 students per IlOUSCl101d (SFD = 0.19 Elementary School StnClentS; 0.10 Middle School Studen(s; 0.11 High School Students) and projects townhouse residential land use at 0.27 students per household (TH = 0.13 Elementary School Students; 0.07 Middle School Students; 0.07 High School Students). Existing and proposed school student generation impact to FCPS is as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is C1.11'1-Cutly approved for the developineIlt Of 232 tOW1111OnSC lots; therefore, the School student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 63 Students. PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maxullum of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the school student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 52 Students. REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 11 school students that will be generated from the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. OTHER POTENTIAL IMPACTS The Ewing Family Cemetery is located within the Southeastern portion of the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Proffer Statements associated with Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 provided for the Creation Of a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the property; as well as an access Casement from the public street t0 the cemetery that Would be maintained by the Ewing Family. The proposed Proffer Statement provides for this saille coil, rllitnlent; therefore, there are no impacts associated with the Ewing Family Cemetery that will result fl-0111 the development of single family detached residential lots on the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre subject property to maintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District land area, and to modify the proffer statement t0 linlit (levelopment Of the 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District to a IllaxilllUm of 130 single -faintly detached residential lots, While maintaining the 100' right-of-way area within the 2.57± acre B-2, Business General District portion of the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to Idle 10126V Impact Analysis SuuemeniIFAW I I Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning accommodate the fLltllrC eXlCr1S1011 Of SOLltll Warrior Drive t0 the fLltul'e Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered LIndC1' RezoniIg Application #22-06. This Rezoning Application results in a reduction of total vehicle trips, a reduction of sewer demand, a reduction of water demand, a reduction of solid waste demand, and a redllCt10I1 Of school students, while maintain the same level Of funding t0 Offset impacts to community facilities proffered under Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner's Proffer Statement provides assurances for these reductions alld for this funding commitment; therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application has adequately mitigated impacts to Frederick County. Attachments: Aerial Overviely Map E.rhibil Southern Frederick Area Plan Land Use Map Exhibit Location and Zoning Map Exhibil Tramsportalion Pmffei- Colnl)llance Exhibit SWSA & UDA Map Exhibil Environmental Features Map Exhibit FEMA FIRM Map Exhibit Soils Map Exhibit Historic Features Map Exhibil Idle 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/l AW 12 '. T rL ,}r Legend Porhon of TM 950-1-1-95 Su"ect to Rezoning Amendment Pubhc Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary Stephens Gty Town L—ts i A 3 �, Z- t r " W oP �. W i r •4 _CN ` Yes i Q W y = 0 Z Z Q W Z . ,LLJ AV h � ° �+ w j U Q z LU V)iz NC7� ro �. = w 3 0 { ' n w a > R �o I cr w UJ U z 1" I i Z a Y w Liz U ° g • t- ¢ pz , - -.•. .r...i._..� _. w w � � Feet ° w LL 400 0 400 R w 'L at. c� fn6rWt Caunq'. V• GiS IJp�Mtry. 2016 0w 2015A�I PO a , C ✓ y of VGNNITA (hro figornws ,Y wprw gmlwcga ,..t •...-.. . L k41' ,.' I OSouthern Frederick Area Plan C) Urban Deveiopment Area Sewer & Water Sery ce Area Parcels Long Range Land Use Plan Residential O High Density Res oential Neighborhood Village Urban Cente, - Momie Home Business Highway Comr'erdai Mixed -Use %- Mixed use CommeroaVOtfice ® Mixed Use IndustnaltOffice - Industrial Warehouse ® Heavy Industrial Exiradrve M n,n ERR Commercial Rec OCommunity Center Fire & Rescue Historic Institutional PUD Park Recreation School erick Area Plan '4 i) ✓ J f�J ors - November 12, 2014 r��'�Ki�l'. 11• NI �I �r� � a'I�Ti �,� I� `� 111 i1•!� ra "•ISM � .f A. wl lb kw ti IF tiff I _ r M5 COUN vT f �R- CLAR4(E COUNTY i t1 0 Stephens City i I 00} a � Q i RIDGEFIEAVE—v O� o FAIRFAx pIKE > Of w 0 SITE 00 s�P rrGAW/ yqR iP ti h9r LOCATION MAP ? J GARDEN GATED J 4�r� LU F- < Q w O e + + _ Z d p c Z ZLLJ O 41 Q 0 1'do, �fti ,N� / = O Z X Z Z = O O ~ W Q 0 of U O p W 3 � i ` > a F- o U Q 2 HAYVENHURST CT Legend N M. N N Q w U p d LPortion of TM 8513-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment = Z j ar Public Sheet Raservatan Area -Instrument No 160002930 m Z O w Z i o 4? Parcel Boundary O ] N 2 Z Z O u ra Q Stephens City Z Qy Town Lirs Cr Z M. Y c w Z 0 Z U 0 P' Frederick County Zoning j° Q p w o ?� I (IGeneral Distnst) O UO Ow LU g Feet a RP (Residential. Performance Distnct) 0 t` " 500 0 500 RA (Rural Area Distnct) W o ,r Wp 0— Sour. Fr� C-rRy. v GIS Depa— 2016 Dav PROFFER / 3 INSET Guard Rail r ' s• r PROFFER • 4 Guard Rail .: ��, • � ``> 1, a �y L ~ PROFFER If 8 00' PROFFER 22 a 5 y ' � r PROFFER / 3 � IDG1. LDS �d , CeC" V 41111 ter' M'N(EF��•ILq� - US N f,> +� 41��.., �� ,. � LE �fF 16 r ♦y. HAYVENHURST-CT t ,[y 'V f 1 'tea I % Jam',• R Legend y Ly R Parcel N.r 100' ROW L.— Feet rr.. P.oprry L.» a 100 ROW L— " - .� 500 250 0 500 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 cjj REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCEEXHIBIT REZONING AMENDMENT rnD 1p ! OPEOUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PROFFER GREENWAY DATE 2016-M30 PROJECTID 3126 DESIGNEDBY DWE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT ENGINEERING SCALE 1—J,a5001aa1 14 Legend Portion of TM 85D-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary j� Stephens City Town L—Id - Sewer -Water Service Area (SWSA) - •tea Urban Development Area (UDA) — Water Une -- Sewer Line rp Dr Sown F.rown,> ,,. ,n J, CrtS Drprrnv6. 2016 DW. WOW r S— Due C—y ,a c.._ 5A Wvwy 2016 s� Tltn. - HArvEHHURST 7 E INSIDE Stry SA 3 UDC DV T SIDE SSA 3 UDA Z u z �Fce w iSc r1 d Q t W - Q O L1J �tiSA J W stir lY �,yP( Z Z 3: X, W Z LLJ T- 0 LLI 0 w U) Lu Q i N a 2 1 Q m i a O z ° N y Q a w a o a N — w A H Z N D 2 w OU w Z W U 2 w F O cn NN 1n w O C' w Q UJ a ,. Feet 3 a e 400 0 400 725 /Tso N/GN /G Z NpE RIOGEFIEI, -AVE ��P 7as o l��p� —750/ JO / LU fir ViT2S�� �`' 2 O* O CP `750 Q 7S0 ^yo 1� Jv GARDEN GATE DR e'Q O.� N lU H In r s0 U) Z W 3 = W Q a Z X ZZ Q U) W W J LL _ Jcf Z_ Z e4. •e414 ti W Z W S O c~ N Z Q ♦ y W W 0 1flf 3�y i�/ o Laoend ' cT ` W/:5 Portion of TM 850-1-1-95 Subtect to Rezoning Amendment Q U < z V) Public Street Reservation Area -Instrument No 180002930 w to a y f� < w K O cr 6 - Parcel Boundary M a Q > 1M1'----- MAYVENMURST CT - p QQ OStephens City Town Limits N Z W 1T = Pond or Lake = j U LL D o /Z O 1<- O 00 U `•1 �2v ✓ �� Wetlands NWI Z w U 0 y C w i — 5 E p J 100 year Flopdplan O z N Z O w y P ] O� U, m Stream O 0 w Feet g . ¢� v� 5 Foot Intermediate Contours w O LL m 500 0 500 R �\ 25 Fool Index Contours w w 1 . , L1,1 Sour- F� County, V% GIS W prFwn. 2016 Dw. FE1,1A Fi—i MW S— C,Nv I MIo "— I —a gm4-,lml j US FM wd WIMul1 SMMci - NMonAI WeRmnxi, I^,,imnlary � sr JW0215 JW0212 P+ 3 / �Oevsr �eFRr y � MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' Stephens Run a� 500 0 1000 2000 EI OO O� 5 Sr Sr yO�ce C9 'Y O N,gRM o°o oR y Sr cr�F°r OQ DNA B y sM° ZONE PANEL 0330D Oe O O Z = 0 FAIRFAX PIKE in C I It M �J TTMA29 GREEN ST FAIRFq,Y r 1%ANNUAL CHANCE j OQ- � FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FLOOD DISCHARGE CONTAINED IN CULVERT in GLECNOAK M11 U� T y FREDERICK COUNTY, mRk<N Z m YIRGINIA WOODTOP L" AND INCORPORATED AREAS PANEL 330 OF 375 A,yF RACVTEN (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) ? O GR T Bq,Q�h'O CONTAINS. J2 2 O COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIy'GA EFREOERK,Kcourvly s1oo53 a3ao 0 1° Gq E DR </B STEPHENS CITY, TOWN OF 510064 0330 D /ZONE Run PStephens <= ZONE X WAKEFIELD CT '/�. Netd when ice to UserThe Map Number shown below should be 0 map orders; the Community Number 01, d?R 3 shown above should be used on Insurance application. to, the subject community. MAP NUMBER xW0218 g o1T^ 51069CO330D HAYVENHURST CT s1 °sue EFFECTIVE DATE POSICIR LD F �It `nAO W0221 SEG SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 w0222 Po o 9y TOWN RUN ZONE A Federal Emergency Management Agency LA PegCeANOP4EN'Y(N Sheep Run '42—Eoaclal coPi a e patlan a the oboe mromtced none map. R JOINS PANEL 0350 '41°pOnE "+. exb.ctea — F—O—na. Inn map mea nor mlect ah"a" me '3900s'"E '40°0°'"E e"amema r.hloh ma n.Ve t.ec mace aub..marr< 1. m. a.ta on utle block. Fortheiata.t product inbrmWon aboU NWonal Flood lrMwarca Praoam load maps check the FEMF. Flood Mep Store al www. mao.fama.pp.• 41C a[ N (1) Z = W Z W Z Q J J_ Q U) _ (D J Z Z_ O0 W Z = O ~ w 0 O 0 Legend m 0 Portion of TM 650-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment w Q Z H Z � ;'ut>hc Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 160D02930 V) Z w :parcel Boundary a o a Q > Stephens City Town Limits w w Z ^ NRCS Soils = N 00 g Z Z O Q U w 3C BLAIRTON SILT LOAM. 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES w Z N i U 0 _ 41CWEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERV SILT LOAMS, 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES N O w y 410 WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERV SILT LOAMS. 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES 0 Lzi O� O 0. LL o atE-WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERV SILT LOAMS, 25 TO 65 PERCENT SLOPES �wa.E� � N 96 CLEARBROOK CHANNERV SILT LOAM 2 TO 7 PERCENT SLOPES 200 w w O y i'0 / t --HAYVIMSi CT—� E Grand View Feet 800 0 800 •34.286 Guard"°°'' M.P Dau Sows Frependt Count,. V. GAS Daperbrvnl. 2016 Data �FAMWD D-CTPIKE M IF �INWOOD-GT �' Z -J = E w M q ry WOOISIDE_CIR 00 Q o� mP / RIDGEFIE)D-AVE o�O �P ti 634-1209 Wisa-Ritanour House P I,ANKWOOQ CT Leaend OPortion of TM 85D-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment © Pudic Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 16DO02930 Parcel Boundary OStephens City Town limits t Cemetery ® Rural landmark Civil War Battlefields 11 !. ,r ,.I„1--, - Fast Kwnstown First Winchester - Second Kemstown -,� Second Winchester Stephensons Depot Third Winchester N w � a Q w Q 2 a w Z cn w D J_ 2 Q = Q w LL Z Z U_ w Z = O O F N O S U) H � a F Z U Q Z O K w a o w Q r> Z r n N w Q N j❑ S 0 LL 00 U � Z Z U Q y w Z Z U c i H N O0 O Y n 0 w n O 0 o a O R 0 0 0 November 14, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Grecmvay Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy I-I111 Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: REZONING #11-16 Southern Mills -Phase 2 PIN: 851)-1-1-95 Dear Evan: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting on November 9, 2016. The above-r•e('erenced application was approved to revise proffers 40.36 acres of land. This amendment allows for the associated with Rezoning 822-06 for construction of 130 single-family detached units. The site is located on the east side of Town Run (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane and in the Opequon Magisterial District. The proffer statement, originally dated June 30, 2016, with final revision date of October 13, 2016, that was approved as a part of this rezoning application is unique to the above referenced properties and is binding regardless of ownership. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted proffer statement for your records. Pursuant to §165.102.06E, the County Attorney will present the written proffer to the Frederick County Clerk of Circuit Court for recordation. Please do not liesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this rezoning application. Sincerely, Candice Perkins, AICP, CZA Senior Planner CEP/pd Attachment cc: Robert Wells, Supervisor Opequon District Robert Moldcn and Roger Thomas, Opcquon District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Ellen Murphy, Commissioner of Revenue Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. 9900 Main St., Suite 500, Fairfax, VA 22031 Rod Williams, County Attorney w/Proffer and Resolution 107 North Kent Str•CCI, Suitc 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Pam Deeter From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON@co.frederick.va.us> To: robertwells946@comcast.net; molden.fredcogovpc@icloud.com; rthomas.fredcogovpc@icloud.com Sent: Monday, November 14, 2016 10:18 AM Subject: Relayed: Approval letter for #11-16 Rezoning Southern Hills Delivery to these recipients or groups is complete, but no delivery notification was sent by the destination server: robertwells946@comcast. molden.fredcogovpc@icloud.com rthomas.fredcogovpc@icloud.com Subject: Approval letter for 411-16 Rezoning Southern Hills REZONING APPLICATION 911-16 SOUTHERN HILLS PHASE 2 Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: October 28, 2016 Stafl'Contact: Candice C. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director Reviewed Planning Commission: 10/19/16 Board of Supervisors: 1 1/09/16 Action Public Hearing Held; Recommended Approval Pending PROPOSAL: To revise the proffers li•onn Rezoning Application 1/22-06 for 40.36 acres (37.79 acres of Residential Performance and 2.57 acres of General BLISiIICSS) "zoning to allow for the COIIStRICtlOII Of LIP to 130 single-family detached units. Rezoning 922-06 allowed for the Construction of up to 232 single- family attached units; therefore this requested rezoning would change the housing type and decrease the total units by 102. LOCATION: The site is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 Miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE 11/09/16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is an application to rezone a total of 40.36 acres of land to revise the proffers associated with Rezoning #22-06. This property contains 37.79 acres ol'RP (Residential Performance) zoned land and 2.57 acres of 132 (General Business) zoned land. This request seeks to amend the proffers to modify the housing type from single-family attached (townhouse) units to single-family detached units as well as decrease the number Of units from 232 to 130 units; decreasing the total units by 102. This property is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and is located within the limits Of' the Southern Frederick Area Plan Of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Colnprcllensive Plan Identifies this property with residential and commercial land use designations. The current RP (Residential Performance) and 132 (General Business) zoning designations are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Since this rezoning was submitted after July 1, 2016 — the specifically attributable proffer policy (§15.2-2303.4) applies to this property; therefore the Applicant is required to demonstrate how their proffers are specifically attributable to the impacts generated by their development. The Applicant has provided an analysis titled "SOLItlICrin Hills Phase 2 Rezoning- Residential Development Attributable Impacts". The total impacts on Public Safety, Public Schools and Parks and Recreation from the proposed development as outlined in the Applicant's report comes to $830.630.70, Staff would note that the Applicant has not addressed impacts On Library Facilities or General Government Facilities. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning at their October 19, 2016 meeting. Tolloivin,g the required public hearing, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. Rezoning I/1 1-16 Southern I -lilts Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist theirs in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Planning Commission: 10/19/16 Board of Supervisors: l 1/09/16 Action Public Hearing Held; Recommended Approval Pending PROPOSAL: To revise the proffers from Rezoning Application #22-06 for 40.36 acres (37.79 acres of Residential Performance and 2.57 acres of General Business) zoning to allow for the construction of up to 130 single- Iamily detached units. Rezoning #22-06 allowed for the construction of up to 232 single- family attached units; therefore this requested rezoning would change the housing type and decrease the total units by 102. LOCATION: The site is located on the cast side of Town Rull Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pikc (Route 277) and Town Run Lane. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opcquon PROPERTY Ill NUMBER: 85D-1-1-95 PROPERTY ZONING: RP (Residential Performance) and 132 (General Business) Districts PRESENT USE: Residential/Commercial — Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) 132 (General Business) South: RP (Residential Performance) Cast: RA (Rural Areas) RP (Residential Performance) West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential / Utility Vacant Use: Residential — Southern Hills Phase I Use: Agricultural Southern Hills Open Space Use: Vacant / Agricultural Rezoning 91 1-16 Southern Hills Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 3 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: Please sere email -om Il4atthetiv Smith, P. E. claled July 26, 2016. Frederick County Fire Marshall: Plan approved. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Please see letler_Ji'om Eric R. Lawrence, AICP, Execulive Director, claled July 14, 2010. Frederick County Public Schools: Please see letter -om K. Yf"ayne Lee, Jr., LEEDAP, claled July22, 2016 . IPlannhng Staff /Tote: Since the submission of the Schools comment, the Board of Supervisors has suspended use of the DIM, in light of the General Assembly °s enactment of § I S.2- 2303.4, which is discussed at further length hi this report.) Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation: It appears the proposed monetary contribution will not meet current Development Impact Model (DIM) levels. Parks and Recreation would like to see minimum levels met. [Planning staff note: Since the submission of the Parks & Recreation comment, the Board of Supervisors has suspended use of the DIM, in light of the Gehheral Assembly's enactment of § I5.2-2303.4, ivhich is discussed atfurther length in this report.) Frederick County Department of Public Works: We have no comments concerning the proposed rezoning. Frederick County Attorney: Please see leller from Roderick B. JVilliams, County Attorney (laled August 4, 2016. Winchester Regional Airport: The proposed rezoning has been reviewed and it appears that it should not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside of the airport's Close In Part 77 surface. However, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from aircraft. Planning & Zoning:_ 1) Site History On July 11, 2001, the Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning Application #01-01 to rezone 105 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) to enable the construction of 250 single-family residential lots (the subject property was part of that original rezoning). On February 28, 2007 the Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning Application #22-06 which revised the proffers to allow Ior 88 single-family detached and 232 single-family attached residential units and 15.5 acres of B2 (General Business) zoned land. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County. Rezoning #1 1-16 S011tllel'Il Hills Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 4 The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is in Official public document that serves as the COMI1lllllity'S guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of Community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within I'rcderlck COIInty. It IS in essence a composition of policies Used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. The Area Plans, Appendix I of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, are the primary implementatioIl tool and will be instrumental to the future planning efforts of the County. Lancl Use. The S011th Frederick Area Plan of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property with residential and commercial land use designations. The current RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business) zoning designations are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Transportation and Site jecess The site is accessed via "Down Run Lane. The 2001 and 2006 rezoning for the Southern Hills development called for a IlUmber Of transportation improvemeIlts which have since been completed: • Stickley Drive Extension to connect with Town Run Lane • GUardrails along Town Rlin Lane • Surface material overlay Of Town Run Lane • Traffic signalization at Fairfax Pike/Stickley Drive The Southern Frederick Area Plan depicts a new minor arterial road which is located within the commercial portion of the site. The right-of-way for the new arterial (the Southern Warrior Drive Extension) continues to be reserved with this rezoning. 3) Proffer Statement — Dated June 30, 2016, revised September 15, 2016, October 13, 2016: A. Land Use Restrictions: 1) The RP portion of the property is restricted to a maximum of 130 single- family detached units. 2) The B2 portion of the property shall contain a 100 foot reservation for Future right-of-way, and will be dedicated upon request by the County Or VDOT. (This reservation has been recorded and is available for a time period of 89 years front the date Of recordation — March 10, 2015). B. Ewing Family Cemetery 1) The owner proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the property. C. Disclosure Statement 1) The final SUbdivision plats and covenants shall State that agricultural land uses exists to the south and east of the property and that the Ewing family cemetery exists as a separate lot with access, and that a wastewater treatment facility exists/previously existed to the north ofthe property. Rezoning #1 1-16 Southern 1-fills Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 5 D. Monetary Contribution 1) The Owner has proffered a total of $830,630.70 (6,389.46 per unit) to offset the residential development impacts. Staff Note: This monetary amount c/range reflects the sole, amendmeilt to the proffers dated Juice 30, 2016 and revised October 13, 2016. 4) Staff Concerns — Monetary Proffers Senate Bill 549 became effective on July 1, 2016 and was codified as Virginia Code 515.2- 2303.4. This proffer policy requires that proffers for residential developments submitted after July 1, 2016 must be specifically attributable to the development. This policy applies to schools, transportation, parks and recreation aIld public safety. The Southern Hills Development submitted in 2001 proffered to provide $4,910 per single- family detached unit, with a maximum of'250 residential units. The project was revised in 2006 to allow for up to 88 single-family detached units (Phase I) and 232 townhouse units (Phase II). The 2006 rezoning retailed the same monetary contribution Of $4,910 (total of $1,139,120 for the tOW11110LISC Units). With this new rezoning, the Applicant is proposing to eliminate the tOWn1101-ISe units and allow for the construction of 130 single-family units while still keeping the moIletaly proffer amount of $830,630.70 (6,389.46 per unit) based on the proffer statement dated June 30, 2016 and revised October 13, 2016. Since this rezoning was subinittcd after .iuly 1, 2016 — the specifically attributable proffer policy applies to this property; therefore the Applicant is required to demonstrate how their proffers are specifically attributable to the impacts generated by their development. The Applicant has provided an analysis titled "Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts". Staff had concerns regarding how the monetary figures provided by the Applicant were specifically attributable t0 the SOLIthern Hills development. The Applicant has since provided an updated proffer statement that reduces the proffer amount to $830,630.70 which is consistent with the Applicant's analysis. • Public Safety — The Applicant has utilized operating costs per average single-family household size nlultipliccl by the total number of proposed dwellings over a ten year period. This amount per the Applicant's analysis conics to $45,636.70 for the Sheriff's Office and $31,513 for the Volunteer Fire and Rescue Services. • S(Cl.1)voukl note that it is not lyl)icul to Utilize operuling costs in calculating proffer amounts — cal)i1al facilities have typically been utilized in the Dust, but S1ct.1*woulcl also note that County Fire and Rescue )vas omitted front the analysis. • Public Schools — Students f -0n1 this development would attend Bass -Hoover Elementary, Aylor Middle School and Sherando High School. The Applicant's analysis shows existing capacity within the elementary and middle schools, however the high school is currently over capacity. Therefore, the Applicant has assumed that with the Rezoning #1 1-16 Southern HiIIs Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 6 total high school proposed cost, divided by the total capacity — the total per student cost Of this school would be $53,275. The analysis assumes that 14 high school students would come from the development — resulting in a total of $745,850. • Parks and Recreation — The Applicant has taken operating costs of Sherando Park multiplied by the percentage of local revenues to fund the park (64% for Sherando). This figure was then divided by the total population of Frederick County and multiplied by the average single-family size and then by the total proposed units in the development and then multiplied by a ten year proposed build out. The total resulting in $7,631 for Sherando Park The total impacts on Public Safety, Public Schools and Parks and Recreation from the proposed development as outlined in the Applicant's report comes to $830.630.70 minus the impacts shown for Clearbrook Park which were removed from the proffers prior to the Planning Commission meeting. . Staff would note that the applicant has not addressed impacts on Library Facilities or General Government Facilities. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FROM THE 10/19/16 MEETING: Staff reported this is an application to revise the proffers from Rezoning #22-06 for 40.36 acres (37.39 acres of RP (Residential Performance) and 2.57 acres of B2 (General Business) zoning to allow for the construction of up to 130 single-family detached units on the RP section of the property. Staff explained Rezoning #22-06 allowed for the construction of up to 232 single-family attached units (townhouses); therefore this requested rezoning would change the housing type and decrease the total units by 102. Staff presented a location map of the property. Mrs. Perkins continued since this rezoning was submitted after July 1, 2016; the specifically attributable proffer policy (§ 15.2-2303.4) applies to this property. Staff noted the Code of Virginia requires residential proffers to be specifically attributable to the impacts generated by the development. It was explained by Staff the Applicant submitted an analysis (Residential Development Attributable Impacts) demonstrating how they believe their proffers could be specifically attributable to their impacts. Staff outlined a number of concerns regarding the Applicant's analysis and how the monetary proffers offered were attributable to the development: Clearbrook Park figures; Additional proffer of $304,179.30. Staff noted the Applicant has since revised the proffers to remove the Clearbrook Park proffer and the $304,179.30, bringing the total proffer to $830,630.70. Mr. Evan Wyatt of Greenway Engineering representing the Applicant came forward. Fle presented a brief history of the project dating back to 2006. Mr. Wyatt explained there was an additional transportation proffer added which called for a 100' right-of-way corridor to set up the cadence to relocate South Warrior Drive in the future should the Stephens City exit #307 be shifted. Mr. Wyatt continued the Applicant has put together a proffer which takes 232 townhouses out of the equation and proposes a maximum of 130 single-family detached homes; this means there is a reduction to impacts for transportation, schools, water and sewer. Mr. Wyatt noted another important item is the Applicant wanted to acquire the 2.5 acre portion in order to control that piece for the right-of-way which has two deeds available to the County or VDOT upon request, and it goes from a reservation to a dedication. Rezoning#1 1-16 Southern I -lilts Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 7 A Commission Member inquired if there is any odor that comes from the waste water treatment pond located there. Mr. Wyatt stated lie has not personally witnessed an odor; however there is a clause in the proffer that requires disclosure to future lot purchasers regarding the proximity of the pond/lagoon. The Commission Member asked if' the proffer amount of $830,630.70 in the revision was totally voluntary. Mr. Wyatt stated that is correct and it was calculated based on attributable impacts. The Commission Member inquired if there is any intent to build on the B2 portion of the property. Mr. Wyatt confirmed there is no intent. A Commission Member inquired when the revised proffers were received. Staff stated the revised proffers were received October 18, 2016. The Commission Member asked does that put the Planning Commission in a compromised position since the bylaws state revised proffers must be received 14 days in advance of the meeting. Director, Michael T. Ruddy explained the bylaws give the Planning Commission the ability to table an application for a variety of reasons; one being if the proffers are provided less than 14 days before the meeting; giving the ability to do so does not mean you have to and it is at the discretion of the Planning Commission. The Commissioner Member noted he does not like getting proffers this close to the meeting date, however in this case the only change in the revised proffers is lowering the monetary amount to what is directly attributable to the development. A motion was made, seconded, and the Commission unanimously recommend approval of'RE-Z 911-16 for Southern Hills. Absent: None EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION FOR THE 11/09/16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: This is an application to rezone a total of' 40.36 acres of land to revise the proffers associated with Rezoning #22-06. This property contains 37.79 acres of RP (Residential Performance) zoned land and 2.57 acres of B2 (General Business) zoned land. This request seeks to amend the proffers to modify the housing type from single-family attached (townhouse) units to single-family detached units as well as decrease the number of units from 232 to 130 units; decreasing the total units by 102. This property is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and is located within the limits of' the Southern Frederick Area Plan of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this property with residential and commercial land use designations. The current RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business) zoning designations are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Since this rezoning was submitted alier July 1, 2016 — the specifically attributable proffer policy (§15.2-2303.4) applies to this property; therefore the Applicant is required to demonstrate how their proffers are specifically attributable to the impacts generated by their development. The Applicant has provided an analysis titled "Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning- Residential Development Attributable Impacts". The total impacts on Public Safety, Public Schools and Parks and Recreation from the proposed development as outlined in the Applicant's report conics to $830.630.70. Staff would note that the Applicant has not addressed impacts on Library Facilities or General Government Facilities. 0 Rezoning #1 1-16 Southern I-IIIIs Phase 2 October 28, 2016 Page 8 The Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning at their October 19, 2016 meeting. Followin;�, the required public hearing, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adeguatelh address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. 0 i ` C) r o Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area Building Footprints B1 (Business, Neighborhood District) B2 (Business, General District) B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District) EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) 4W HE (Higher Education District) M1 (Industrial, Light District) M2 (Industrial, General District) • MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) MS (Medical Support District) OM (Office - Manufacturing Park) R4 (Residential Planned Community District) R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) RA (Rural Area District) RP (Residential Performance District) so t TOWN RUN EN °re SOUTHERN 0" HILLS O Subdivision -9rFOFti �P MEADOWS EDGE Subdivision T• QD 01 a- J;tt2 WVA;KEFIEL CiAKErIELJ. K CT - FA'741 VENHURST CT Zj stpMns City GARDIN GATT DR N YVFNHLW%T cI Note: REZ # 1 1 - 16 Frederick County Dept of Southern Hills Phase 2 PDevelopment 07 07 N Kent Kentt St PIN. Suite 202 85D - I - I - 95 Winchester. VA 22601 Revised Proffers 540 - 665 - 5651 Mop Created: September 27. 2016 Staff: cperkins 0 205 410 820 Feet r REZ a)1-16. 1 ," , 1 ••�' SOUTHERN '• HILLS 1 1 1• Subdivision t. ' � 1 1 Y zC) .� WAKEFIELD v ' 100 NOR WIC-N SII /EA -E t ILENTY IN Applications Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area Building Footprints c�lFOFti • q MEADOW'S :♦ EDGE i� i A *sit Note: REZ # 11 - 16 Frederick County Dept of Southern Hills Phase 2 Planning Developme�e 107 N Kent St PIN' Suite 202 85D - I - I - 95 Winchester. VA 2260' Revised Proffers 540 - 665 - 5651 Mop Created: September 27. 2016 Staff: cperkins 0 205 410 920 Feet si • +.•i Revised Proffers CT am Southern Hills Phase 2 10 ME UB ®Q.'1 : P♦i%���� ♦�♦�♦�� ••s, ,n, �•�•ii♦ice%•`�j�i MEADOW S 4P•i� 1���♦�P♦ . EDGE � .�.�.♦.����:�y�.♦ Subdivision 'RE I 1-16 :.�• ♦ems.♦♦♦•.d ♦♦��� ♦ ",.•♦1♦1�1�s a `. ` . :♦�♦i••♦•♦1�� j♦ j`'' s • 1 � • /' «�` • - 4f. SOUTHERN��j�1���•♦•�•�•�•���' �a ���•�♦� HILLS ����j��♦•�•��j�j�i���' -^. Apphcatu,°S �j+-<P.7&i4V*40_ Subdivision►,, IA♦PP�1�1�•�♦j` Parcels •� .• , •a►•= i ' �P+411, s.��1�1�1�♦�•♦-��♦�♦�♦1�< Sewer and Water Service Area <`�"y�P•sp��:♦���P�♦��♦�♦�•�•�♦�� - Building Footprints !<,. �.♦.�.1��♦1P1�1♦ ♦ P••♦♦P♦j! • ♦ • ♦ • 1 1 1♦1P•P♦♦P• • • 1 •� Long ROange LResdde8eal •ram.. .♦jaw r � 4�1�1�•��►••1♦4& • ! MCI �•t Neighborhood Village 17 (� ♦� . „ �P♦♦♦♦P♦•1•1♦♦��j�j Urban Center Z+� '+ ♦♦ ♦ •♦•♦♦♦♦� •�•� ^�-. - Mobile Home Community a Q(}) Business ~ P �'r�': Mom. +, Highway Commercial > ' 0 •♦ - �j�j 1 •♦<♦♦j •, i e • • Mixed -Use e♦ �♦• • y •�•11���1� �♦•P�� �♦ate 0 Mixed Use Commercial/Office • ♦�♦1♦♦���♦�••♦• -s 0 Mixed Use Industrial/Office . , s- - /F! ♦♦♦♦1 •♦7+4 - Industrial ♦ V ♦'� �••�♦• ',��'�+ ® Warehouse \ ♦• •� ♦j4 r rP♦j�1 �1 ♦r ` 1< Heavy Industrial ♦ - •- r r � •�♦ HAY.VENHURST CT •�i�P Extractive Mining �t - _, -- 1• :♦• Commercial Rec �14 �` ♦ �� f< :� +j ♦'� ♦♦�♦'�*' -`� Rural Community Center �j 1� < ♦ �� 'v j i �� r m ® Fire & Rescue -e� �• 1♦ �� t• �< �jSte—P z CMy O Historic 11� GAADr N GATT DR ® Institutional y +� • Planned Unit Development 3 ///i Park Q 8�'♦� Recreation (0) School .iy HAVE NWasi cr t}(J� Employment Airport Support Area 0 62/83 O Residential. 4 u/a High -Density Residential. 6 u/a High -Density Residential. 12-16 u/a Rural Area Interstate Buffer Landfill Support Area Natural Resources 8 Recreation ® Environmental 8 Recreational Resources Note: REZ # 11 - 16 Frederick County Dept of Southern Hills Phase 2 Planning 8, Developme^e 107 N Kent St PIN Suite 202 85D - I - I - 95 Winchester. VA 2260' Revised Proffers 540 - 665 - 5651 Map Created: September 27 2016 Staff: cperkins n �cn Fnn 7 r1M F—f • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79E acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57E acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.791 acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57E acres of B2, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36E acres (RP District 37.79E acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings I11, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills — Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: September 15, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36j:-acre parcel from 37.79:L acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57E acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79E acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with modified proffers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be File #3126V/FAW 9 0 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument #160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79f acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. • 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery 1. The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewing Family Cemetery lot shall be established via an appropriate easement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said easement. • File #3126V/EAW 2 0 9 • • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1,139,120.00 value reflects the monetary contribution that was approved by Frederick County for the 232 townhouse lots entitled on the Property as part of Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner proffers to include a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single- family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Owner shall cause for the payment of the established monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for each developed single- family detached dwelling unit within the Property. File #3126V/EAW OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE 9 I' Greenway Engineering Owner Signature June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager 1&-/0 Date Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of FAUZ FAQ To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this &Aday of SF -Pr A&O 20-&by R 1 G14Pt-& &,ga iL a., AV& Notary Public My Commission Expires s��1b/ b( File #3126V/EAW VICTORIA A. TRACE Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia #131615 My commission expires Aug. 31, 201f4 • • PROFFER STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com Greenway Engineering • June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of 132, I3usiness General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of 132, I3usiness General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36± acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1- I -95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMI3 Itivestmertts, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Grecnway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern I -fills — Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: September 1 s��2016 October 13, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amencled, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the UndersigIled Owiler hereby proffers that in the event the Board Of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36±-acre parcel from 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of 132, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of' B2, Business General District With modified proffers, (level opment of the Property Shall be done lil conformity with the terms ailcl COiiditiolls set forth herein, except to the extent that SIICh terms aild corlditiorts may be subsequently amertcled or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors m accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. hi the event that such rezoning is riot granted, then these proffers shall be File lt3126V/IiAW Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 deemed wlthdrawil and have Ilo Cffect whatsoever. These proffers Shall be bllldiIlg upori this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more partiCUlarly described as the lands owned by Arcadia COI11i11llillties, LLC a Virginia limited liability coillparly; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Filrulcial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of� Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument #160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat Of the land Ol' Arcadia COr11i11tlilities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79± acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business Gencral District portion of' the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 10040ot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County Or VDOT, provided Such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 2105, as described in Ir1StR1111CIlt #i60002930. The reservation Shall be available for fulfillment Of' Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a publiC Street within the Property. Access from the pUblic Street to the Ewirlg Family Ceilletery lot Shall be established via an appropriate easement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said casement. File #3126v/I:AW 2 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agi'1CLIIlui'al land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Properly; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Properly; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist oi' pi'evlotlsly existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner }lcreby proffers to provicle a total monetary contribution of 1,139,120.c $830,630.70 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1 13n 12n nn , „l e fleets the men as, of Rezoning n pplieation #22 06. The Owner proffers to include a ❑ari'ative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contI'ibUtion for each single-family detached residential lot that egUates to the total monetary contribution of $ 1,1 391 -2n nn `6830,630.70 divided by the total number of single- family detached 1esidential lots. The Ownei' shall caUse for the payment of tile established monetary contl'1bLltloll foi' each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for each developed single-family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE File 10126w1?Aw 3 Greenway Engineering Owner Signature 9 June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County COCIe. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings 111, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Managei- B y: Commonweal th ol' Virginia, City/COLlnty Of To Wit: The I'oregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20_ by Notary Public My Commission Expires Date File #3126v/IiAw 4 lb PROFFER STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester. VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com 0 • AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: October 19, 2016 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: November 9, 2016 - ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING # 1 1-16 SOUTHERN HILLS - PIASE 2 WHEREAS, Rezoning 911-16 of Southern Hills —Phase 2, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to revise the proffers from Rezoning Application #22-06 for 40.36 acres (37.79 acres of Residential Performance and 2.57 acres of General Business zoning) to allow for the construction of up to 130 single- family detached units with the proffers final revision date of October 13, 2016, was considered. The Property is located on the cast side of Town RLIn Lane (ROLIte 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane, and further identified with Property Identification Number 85D-1-1-95 in the Opequon Magisterial District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning COII11111ss1011 field a pLlblic hearing on this rezoning on October 19, 2016 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Board Of SL1pC1'V1SO1'S held a pUbhc hearing Oil this rezoning oil November 9, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance With the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the proffers associated with rezoning 922-06 for 40.36 acres. These amended proffers modify the housing type from single-family attached (townhouse) units to single-family detached units as well as decrease the number of units from 232 to 130 units; decreasing the total units by 102, with a final revision date of October 13, 2016. The conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the Applicant and the Property Owner are attached. PDRes #45-16 0 . -2- This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of acloptlon. Passed this 9th day ol'Novembcr, 2016 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeI-Iaven, Jr., Chairman Gary A. Lofton Robert A. I-Iess Robert W. Wells Gene E. Fisher Judith McCann -Slaughter Blaine P. Dunn A COPY ATTEST Brenda G. Garton Frederick County Administrator PDRes #45-16 0 • Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Revised 10/13/16 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide information specific to the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Proffer Statement dated Rine 30, 2016 that demonstrates attrlbUtable iIllpacts foI' the proposed 130 single-family detached residential lots. This document provides specific sections that identify residential attributable impacts for transportation1, public safety, schools aIld parks and recreation services; as well as the proffered conditions that address these impacts. PROJECT SUMMARY The Southern Hills Subdivision was Originally approved by Frederick County in 2001 for 250 single-family dwelling units on 105± acres located on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012). The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions and monetary contributions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #01-01, Which included several off -site transportation improvements and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained single family lots within Southern Hills -Phase 1 and modified the remainder of the project area to allow for 232 townhouse lots within Southern Hills —Phase 2 and to allow commercial 'Lolling ill the northern portion Of the project Identified as SOLlthern Hills — Phase 3. The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions specific to the Proffcl' Statement rued with Rezoning Application #22-06, which included the transportation improveillents f1'orn Rezoning Application #01-01, the provision oI a 100' right -Of - way area between the Phase 2 TOwnhOL1ses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay to accommodate the future extension 01' South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation, and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Arcadia Communities, LLC acquired the Phase I Single -Family Section, the Phase 2 Townhouse Section, and approximately 2.6± acres of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay that is proposed to provide the 100' right-ol-way area between the Phase 2 TowllllOUSCs and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. Arcadia C0111111LI n i ties, LLC has submitted a Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement dated Rine 30, 2016 for the portion of the Phase 2 Townhouse Land Bay and the 2.6± acre portion of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. This Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 Single -Family lots within Phase 2 in-lieu-01' the 232 Townhouse lots, provides for the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 and Phase 3 Commercial Land Bays, and provides all $830,630.70 monetary contribution. Residential Attributable Impacts Document I Revised October 13, 2016 TRANSPORTATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed attributable impacts to transportation associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction ol' 505 VPD The proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 were Cletcrmined to be appropriate to mitigate transportation impacts for the Southern Hills Subdivision. The proffered transportation improvements have been performed ill advance Of 1'cSIClential development activities, Which il1CILICIC the following: Completion of the extension Of Stickley Drive (Route 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). i Installation Of gUardrall along Town RLIn Lane (ROLItC 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. COIl1pICti011 Of' ileW Surface material overlay Of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). Recordation of' the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to VDOT and/or Frederick County. CONCLUSION: The Southern I-lillS-Phase 2 Re-z_oning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of vehicle trips generated from the proffered single- family lots. The SOLlthel-ll Hills SLlbdivisioll has performed all proffered trallsportatloll improvements Cleenled to be reC]Lllred to mitigate transportation impacts and has provided VDOT and Frederick County with the ability to obtain the 100' light -of -way area for fUtUre public Street improvements to connect to the proposed Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. These facts demonstrate that 01C SOLItlICI-11 Hills Phase-2 Rezoning Application has addressed attributable impacts specific to the proposed residential development. Residential Attributable Impacts Document 2 Revised October 13, 2016 0 • PUBLIC SAFETY — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of' 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential (level of) men t for public safety services is determined by the number Of persons required to serve. The following information identifies the average number Of persons projected for townhouse and Single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable Impacts to public safety associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/11ol1SChO1d* = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family X 3.14 average family size = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 197 persons '``Persons Per Household (PPH) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document— Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.58. '}' 'Average Family Size value determined from US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page .5). The 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Document does not identify capital projects for the Sheriff's Office, nor does the CIP DOClltlleilt identify capital projects for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, which is the first due company for the Southern Hills —Phase 2 residential lots. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Frederick County Sherif'f'S Office and for the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget DOCumCnt demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County, which amounts to approximately 77% for both the Sheriff's Office and the Vollulteer Fire Departments. The Budget DOCUI11CIlt provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for both departments. Operating Costs may include CC1L11pn1Cnt Costs (bill are not CXCIliSIVCIy CCllllpment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides conservative valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $1,207,973.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $930,139.00 $930,139.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $1 1.18/person $1 1.18 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $35.10/SFD household $35.10 x 130 SFD = $4,563.67 annual impact $4,563.70 x 10 years'` = $45,636.70 Residential Attributable Impacts DOCUmCnt 3 Revised October 13, 2016 VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $834,419.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $642,502.00 $642,502.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $7.72/person $7.72 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $24.24/SFD household $24.24 x 130 SFD = $3,151.30 annual impact $3,151.30 x 10 years:!: = $31,513.00 *10 years is the conservative build -Out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -Out. CONCLUSION: The Southern I-Iills-Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction Of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The Current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) does not Identify proposed projects that are relevant to the Sheriff's Office and the StCpllellS City VOILInteer Fire and Rescue Company, nor does the CIP identify proposed capital projects in which the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will have attributable impacts towards. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for Public Safety Services. Operating Costs may lllClllde CqulpnlCilt COSTS, although the total value Of Operating COSTS is 110t CXCILISIVely for Capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period. This is a Conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a lodger than average build-OLlt projection for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value Of anlWal Operating Costs over the build -out period. PUBLIC SCHOOLS — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACT'S The Southern I-IillS Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) utilizes the following StLldent/hOLISell Old projects for Single-family lots and for townhouse lots as a basis for determining impacts to public schools: Single -Family Lots: Elementary School = 0.19 students per household Middle School = 0.09 Students per household High School = 0.10 Students per household Residential Attributable Impacts Document 4 Revised October 13, 2016 • Townhouse Lots: Elementary School = 0.13 StLtdentS per household Middle School = 0.07 students per household High School = 0.07 students per household The SOLlthern Hills —Phase 2 Development Will result in a reduction of 6 Elementary School Students; 5 Middle School students; and 3 High School Students based On projections utilized by FCPS. FCPS provided information1 that States StLldClltS fi'Om the SOLLthern Hills —Phase 2 Development will attend Bass -Hoover Elementary School, Robert E. Aylor Middle School, and Sherando High School. FCPS projects that there will be 25 Elementary School StL1delltS, 12 Middle School Students, and 14 High School Students from the 130 single-family lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2. This information indicates that there is sufficient capacity at Bass -Hoover Elementary School and Robert E. Aylor Middle School to accommodate the projected increase in students from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development; however, this information indicates that the capacity at Sherando High School is already exceeded by 118 StlldentS. FCPS has acquired property for a new high school that Will provide for acceptable capacity for Students utilizing the new facility and for StLldcnts at Sherando High School once the Ilew facility is open. FCPS has received fuIlding for design Services and anticipates opening the new high school faculty in Fall 2019. CONCLUSION: FCPS has provided capital cost information for the new high school that assumes a pl'1CC-pCl'-StLldcnt i11L11tipliff for the school capacity, which totals $53,275.00 per student. FCPS projects that the Student generation frolll the SOLIffiffn 1-Iills—Phase 2 Development will result in $745,850.00 of capital cost based on the price -per -student multiplier. The Frederick County 2016- 2017 Annual Budget DOCLI111Cllt provides budget information for the School Debt Service (page 179), which accounts for all School pr0JCClS ill the County that have been funded through bond revenues. This information does not provide Sufficient information to determiile attributable impacts to Specific schools; therefore, the $745,850.00 projection for the price -per -student multiplier for the new high school will be used for this analysis, which Should be considered very conservative since Students fl•0111 the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will not utilize the new high school facility. PARKS & RECREATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 tOW1111OLISC lots and provides for a maxi111L1111 Of 130 Single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for parks and recreation services is determined by the number of persons required to serve. The following information identifies the average Residential Attributable Impacts Document 5 Revised October 13, 2016 • (lumber of persons projected for townhouse and single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to parks and recreation associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/household" = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size* = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 197 persons Persons Per Household (PPH) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document — Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.59. "Average Family Sire value determined from US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - Frederick County 2016-2017 (page 195). The Budget DOCLullent identifies that the C11' Consists of a schedule for IllaJor capital expCllditures for the County for the euSUing five years. Additionally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is strictly advisory and that it is possible particular projects may not be funded during the year that It Is indicated in the CIP. Finally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. The 2015-2016 CIP Document provides a section entitled Project Funding (page 21), which identifies how capital projects are funded for various agencies and divisions. The CIP Document states that funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. Additionally, the CiP Document advises that the Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. The Parks and Recreation Department identifies $71,648,000.00 in CIP projects that are to be funded by the County during the 2015-2020 fiscal years. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County Parks and Recreation during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years for Sherando Park (page 151). Funding for this regional park is achieved primarily from fees charged for use of facilities and from local revenues. Local revenues for Sherando Park averaged $267,347.00. The percentage of local revenues to fluid Sherando Park averaged 64%, with the remaining funding Corning fl'0111 fees Charged for Use of facilities. The Budget Document provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for Sherando Park. Operating Costs may ilICiLKIC CClUipment costs (but are not exclusively equipment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. It is more than likely that residents of the Residential Attributable Impacts Document 6 Revised October 13, 2016 Southern Hills —Phase 2 project will utilize Sherando Park based on the proximity of the regional park to this project. SHEIZANDO PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $243,123.00 x .64 (Local Funds) : = $155,.598.72 $155,598.72/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.87/person $1.87 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Sire) = $5.87/SFD household $5.87 x 130 SFD = $763.10 annual impact $763.10 x 10 years'1 = $7,631.00 10 years Is the conservative bLllld-OLlt horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. SHERANDO PAIZK ATTRI13UTAI3LE IMPACT = $7,631.00 CONCLUSION: The Southern I -fills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction Of residential lots and will result in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Document does not identify capital projects that were demonstrated for funding during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal year budgets. Additionally, the CIP Identifies that funding for Parks and RCCI'catlon Department capital projects Will come Il'om the unreserved fund balance 01' the County. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual BLldget Document provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for Sherando Regional Park. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% Of' annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period for Sherando Regional Park. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average bLllld-OLlt pl'OICCtion for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -out period. SOUTHERN HILLS —PHASE 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The information In this CIOCLIIIIent has been developed t0 determine attributable impacts from the Southern I -fills —Phase 2 Development t0 demonstrate that the $830,630.70 monetary contribution identified in Section D. Monetary Contributions of the October 13, 2016 Proffer Statement is appropriate. The following information is provided from the various sections of this document: Residential Attributable Impacts Document 7 Revised October 13, 2016 • Transportation Lnpacts: NONE (all proffered transportation improvements complete) Public Safety Impacts: $ 77,149.70 Total Public Schools Impacts: $745,850.00 Total Parks & Recreation Impacts: $ 7,631.00 Total Total Attributable Impacts: $830,630.70 Total Proffered Monetary Contribution: $830,630.70 Attachments •:• Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit 6-30-16 Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts • Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan DOCument Excerpts Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables US Census Bureau I-IOLISC1101CI and Families Document Residential Attributable Impacts Document 8 Revised October 13, 2016 Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit • ` - —r-- PROFFER A 3 INSET • ,. / Ir . Guard RON s ~ 'rjti Guard RaN ,II "cam ' N7 j PROFFER 0 e 7•P'i of PROFFER i 2 7 Jp .• PROFFER 10 3 \ .7C 0f3EFlELD W.���?,► tom,, P�� � Vv •� ti ., ����r �i��0. '�,'..�� "'.; k a w ` • 4 ARCADIA _11� A4 COMMERCIAL •+ fia SOUTHERN HILLS: � rj� � 1 �� � 4, PROFFER 114 , " !PHASE 2 a �~ 04 O Z �lAVVf N„ P;, IN r 4 1 • a t Legend P& Boundary i'��• ♦ ! y r . N" tar ROW Un. , _ Feet Now Prop" Line a 1W ROW Line � �� � � I �• �. �y 500 250 0 500 0 _a A SOUTHERN HILLS • PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS PHASE 2 REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT REZONING AMENDMENT OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE: 2016-W30 PROJECT ID: 3128 DESIGNETRANSPORTATION PROFFER GREEN WAY o SCALE: 1Inch -50obd D BV DWE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT ENG[NEER'NG ' 3 E 0 •1 • I • Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts 0 Sheriff Volunteer Fire Departments Ambulance & Rescue Service Public Safety Contributions Juvenile Court Probation Inspections Fire and Rescue Public Safety Communications PUBLIC SAFETY Fire and Rescue) 32% Inspections 4% Juvenile Court Probation 0% County of Frederick, VA Public Safety 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $11,610,858 $11,644,337 $11,644,337 $402,822 3.58% 987,582 895,305 895,305 52,745 6.26% 395,029 395,200 395,200 0 0.00% 5,302,908 5,513,558 5,513,558 45,633 0.83% 149,981 146,835 146,835 5,055 3.57% 1,122,692 1,151,981 1,151,981 61,964 5.68% 8,266,034 9,829,763 9,829,763 1,957,774 24.87% 1,235,238 1,417,841 1,417,841 57,520 4.23% $29,070,322 $32,994,820 $30,994 820 $2,583,513 9.09% Public Safety Communications JCIVIGC Contributions 1 % 18% 108 Sheriff 37% mteer Fire iartments 3% FY 2016 - 2017 0 0 SHERIFF DESCRIPTION: 3102 The Frederick County Sheriff's Office is comprised of four divisions: Patrol, Administrative Services, Investigative, and Court Security/Civil Process. The Patrol Division is responsible for answering calls for service, initial investigations of criminal complaints, and patrolling the streets and highways for traffic violations. Additionally, each shift is responsible for business checks, serving warrants, responding to alarms, handling Detention Orders, Protective Orders, and preparing cases and presenting evidence in Court. The Traffic Unit is one of the fastest growing units within the Patrol Division. The number of traffic complaints, accident investigations, and citations issued continues to increase as the community continues to grow. Originally the intent for this unit was to supplement the Virginia State Police in handling the number of complaints dealing with traffic. Since the inception of the traffic unit, this office has become the primary agency for dealing with traffic complaints. The traffic unit also handles special traffic complaints reported to the Sheriffs office and coordinates and establishes special details such as DUI checkpoints and seatbelt safety checkpoints. The Administrative Services Division is responsible for the School Resource Officers and the Animal Control Officers. This division also maintains the Sheriffs Office accreditation and provides community services such as Neighborhood Watch, Project Watch, and Project Lifesaver. The Sheriff's Office Emergency Response Team is also part of the Administrative Services Division. The Investigation Division handles all major felony cases and the more serious and violent misdemeanor cases, in addition to special investigations into drugs, gangs, child pornography, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, white collar crime, computer crimes, and fraud. The Court Security/Civil Process division is responsible for providing security for the Frederick County Courts. This division is also responsible for serving all civil papers within Frederick County and handling prisoner extraditions and prisoner transports. 0 GOALS: • Provide the citizens of Frederick County the best services possible by providing community relations through deputies performing a variety of duties, to include Sheriff's Kid Camp, the D.A.R.E. program, Neighborhood Watch meetings, Project Lifesaver, VIN Etching, Elder Assistance Programs, and Child Fingerprinting. • Continue to upgrade law enforcement equipment with more modern equipment such as TASERS, :Less than Lethal Weapons and other alternatives to deadly force while keeping the safety of our personnel and the public as our #1 priority. • Continue working relationships with outside agencies that request our services. • Continue efforts to recruit and hire quality personnel. • Continue to maintain the Virginia Law Enforcement Accreditation Standards. • Provide School Resource Officers (SRO) for as many schools as possible. • Train and utilize a Bloodhound for search and rescue and fugitive location. . PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Actual Projected Projected Law Enforcement Calls for Service 71,132 62,722 58,144 # of Warrants Served 7,585 7,640 7,622 # of Criminal Arrests 4,116 3,935 3,879 # of Citations Issued 5,733 4,526 3,797 # of Cases Reported 5,536 6,593 6,436 # of Civil Papers Served 18,694 18,057 17,701 # of Extraditions/Transports 398 448 467 BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted Actual Budget Budget Budget Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases 9,796,034 1,212,599 602,225 10,480,064 1,152,948 11,325 10,207,584 981,587 647,835 11,128,561 1,207,973 11429 TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 12,347,963 Revenue: Fees State/Federal 574,534 2,677,122 447,045 2,352,154 578,347 2,657,125 432,745 2,388,421 Local 8,359,202 8,845,138 8,601,534 9,526,797 TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 12,347,963 Full-time Positions 126.5 133.5 133.5 1 139.5 Increase/Decrease FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Amount % 648,497 6.19% 55,025 4.77% 104 0.92% 703,626 6.04% -14,300 -3.20% 36,267 1.54% 681,659 7.71% 703,626 6.04% 4.49% . County of Frederick, VA 110 FY 2016 - 2017 • • 0 VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS 3202 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this expenditure activity is to provide contributions to the eleven volunteer fire companies which serve Frederick County. The contribution is used by the fire company to support their mission of providing fire protection to the residents of their service area. Each volunteer company provides an annual financial statement to the county as evidence of expenses incurred. The governing body of the county recognizes the invaluable contributions made to the community by our volunteer fire companies. GOALS: • Provide fair and accurate contributions to the county fire departments. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Actual Budget Budget Costs: Personnel 73,676 73,676 66,308 Operating 913,906 821,629 1,031,745 Capital/Leases 0 0 0 TOTAL 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 Revenue: Fees 0 0 0 State/Federal 273,993 220,000 214,535 Local 713,589 675,305 883,518 TOTAL 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 Full-time Positions 0 0 01 FY 2017 Adopted Budget 73,676 834,419 0 908,095 0 210,000 698,095 908,095 0 Increase/Decrease FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Amount % 0 0.00% 12,790 1.56% 0 0.00% 12,790 1.43% 0 0.00% -10,000 -4.55% 22,790 3.37% 12,790 1.43% 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 111 FY 2016 - 2017 0 • • • Parks & Rec. — Admin. Parks Maintenance Recreation Centers Clearbrook Park Sherando Park Regional Library PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL Parks, Recreation & Cultural 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $607,026 $1,035,835 $707,341 -$328,494 -31.71% 1,570,785 1,042,120 1,062,790 20,670 1.98% 1,562,265 2,107,290 2,707,142 599,852 28.47% 387,821 434,999 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 434,821 409,482 410,398 916 0.22% 862,665 862,665 942,357 79,692 9.24% $5,425,383 $5,892,391 $6 218 950 $326,559 5.54% Regional Library 15% Sherando Park 7% Clearbrook Park VOW05 6% Recreation Centers 44% Parks & Rec. - Admin. 11% 1 Parks Maintenance [17% Room County of Frederick, VA 145 FY 2016 - 2017 0 0 CLEARBROOK PARK DESCRIPTION: The Clearbrook Park budget contains all the necessary funds to maintain the 55 acre Clearbrook Park, three N parks, two Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) high schools, two FCPS middle schools, seven FCPS el6j two additional FCPS building grounds, and the Old Frederick County Courthouse %lawn. d GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently o the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees State/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions 109 is schools, 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015/ pproved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Ac 1' Budget Budget Budget Amount % 129562 154,243 156,576 149,429 -4,814 -3.12% 234:958 280,756 231,683 234,843 -45,913 -16.35% 23,301 0 44,739 4,650 4,650 100.00% 387,821 434,999 432,998 388,922 46,077 -10.59% 212,064 336,100 375,708 232,528 -103,572 -30.82% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 175,757 98,899 57,290 156,394 57,495 58.14% 387,821 434,999 432,998 388,922 46,077 -10.59% 0 0 O-L 0 0 0.00% • County of Frederick, VA 150 FY 2016 - 2017 SHERANDO PARK • 7110 DESCRIPTION: The Sherando Park budget contains all the necessary funds to maintain the 334 acre Sherando Park and the grounds at one Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) high school, two FCPS middle schools, five FCPS elementary schools, Frederick County Public Safety Building, and Warrior Drive Right -Of -Way. • • GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted Actual Budget Budget Budget Costs: Personnel 156,777 160,387 143,376 160,275 Operating 214,053 249,095 144,382 243,123 Capital/Leases 63,991 0 38,721 7,000 TOTAL 434,821 409,482 326,479 410,398 Revenue: Fees 127,887 157,700 177,959 167,072 State/Federal 0 0 0 0 Local 306,934 251,782 148,520 243,326 410,398 TOTAL 434,821 409,482 326,479 Full-time Positions 0 0 0 0 Increase/Decrease FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Amount % -112 -5,972 7,000 -0.07% -2.40% 100.00% 916 0.22% 9,372 5.94% 0 0.00% -8,456 -3.36% 916 0.22% 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 151 FY 2016 - 2017 0 • • Instruction Admin./Attendance & Health Pupil Transportation Operation & Maintenance Facilities Technology School Debt Service Transfers School Nutrition Services School Textbook Private Purpose Funds School Capital Fund NREP Operating Fund NREP Textbook Fund Consolidated Services SCHOOLFUNDS Schools 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $100,338,683 $113,461,369 $116,910,372 $3,449,003 3.04% 5,648,324 6,387,423 6,771,401 383,978 6.01% 8,275,541 8,698,744 8,767,835 69,091 0.79% 11,862,433 12,842,221 13,423,274 581,053 4.52% 171,708 204,412 206,887 2,475 1.21% 5,638,600 5,965,019 6,565,886 600,867 10.07% 13,999,653 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 425,797 469,739 565,345 95,606 20.35% 4,443,951 6,626,934 6,669,757 42,823 0.65% 906,097 1,900,544 2,666,452 765,908 40.30% 15,308 75,000 75,000 0 0.00% 1,136,445 500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 500.00% 4,290,687 5,259,238 5,346,744 87,506 1.66% 11,644 40,000 50,000 10,000 25.00% 2,898,133 3,600,000 3,600,000 0 0.00% $160,063,004 $181,267,128 1 $191,065 242 $9,798,114 5.41 % Private Purpose, NREP, 2.8% School Nutrition Services, 3.5% School Textbook, 1.4% School Debt Service, 8.6%� Technology, 3.4% Facilities, Operation & Maint., 7.0%f Pupil Transportation, 4.6% „ Admin./Attendance &:. Health, 3.5% Consolidated Services, 1.9% e School Capital, 1.6% Transfers, 0.3% Instruction, 61.2% County of Frederick, VA 179 FY 2016 - 2017 SCHOOL DEBT SERVICE DESCRIPTION: 0 Whenever extensive building programs are developed by the school board and loans through bonds and the Virginia Literary Fund are procured, it is necessary to set up a schedule of repayment over a twenty year period. The funds in this category include principal and interest for Virginia Public School Authority Bonds, Virginia Literary Fund payments and principal and interest for interim financing as required. An additional cost included in this budget are fees for handling bonds and fees charged for investing VPSA bond proceeds Increased funding from the County Board of Supervisors is required due to scheduled financing repayments on the construction of the replacement Frederick County Middle School. GOALS: • To repay the money borrowed through bond issuance and literary loans over a twenty year period. • BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees State/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 - 7.94% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 275,783 337,043 337,043 370,524 33,481 9.93% 14,626,151 14,899,442 14,899,442 16,075,765 1,176,323 7.90% 14,901,934 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 11 County of Frederick, VA 187 FY 2016 - 2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN • FREDERICK COUNTY 2016-2017 The Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local planning commission. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP consists of a separate document that was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 25, 2015. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plan as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan. Frederick County approved the 2030 Comprehensive Plan on July 3, 2011. The Capital Improvements Plan is strictly advisory. It is possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. Transportation projects are included in the CIP. The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. isImpact of the Capital Program on the Operating Budget: The Capital Program has three direct impacts on the Operating Budget. The primary impact is in the Debt Service accounts. The greatest part of the county's capital improvement costs have been funded through the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, which generally are repaid over a period of twenty years. The only debt of this nature is funding for the construction of schools. • The second impact of the Capital Program upon the Operating Budget is in the Cash Capital account. Cash Capital is the appropriation of General Fund monies to fund capital improvement projects. Financing capital projects on a pay-as-you-go basis minimizes the need for issuing bonds and substantially reduces current and future debt service costs. The third and final impact of the CIP on the Operating Budget arises when the CIP project is completed and the county must operate and maintain the new facility. In some instances, the costs re absorbed within the current budget of the department(s) providing the service. In other instances, such as the opening of a new school, direct operating and maintenance costs, as well as increases in the staff must be budgeted on an ongoing basis. The Capital Improvements Plan developed by the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee is presented on the following page. NOTE: The FY 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan is the most recent Board approved CIP at time of print of this document. The CIP process is currently under review in order to make it more relevant, useful, and accurate. County of Frederick, VA 195 FY 2016 - 2017 Frederick County, Virginia Additional Miscellaneous/Demographic Statistics Demographic Profilel Percent Value Frederick County, Virginia IFrederick Virginia USA County, VI is Virginia USA Demo ra hies Population' - - - 83,199 8,382 993 321,418,820 Population Annual Average Growth2 1.8% 1.0% 0.8% 1,328 80,589 2,590,222 Median Age' -- -- - 39.1 37.5 37.2 Under 18 Years 25.1% 23.2% 24.0% 19,675 1,853,677 74 181,467 18 to 24 Years 7.9% 10.0% 9.9% 6,179 802,099 30,672,088 25 to 34 Years 11.7% 13.6% 13.3% 9,183 1,090,419 41,063,948 35 to 44 Years 14.6% 13.90/a 13.3% 11,431 1,108,928 41,0 606 45 to 54 Years 16.0% 15.2% 14.6% 12,558 1,214 000 45 006,716 55 to 64 Years 11.90/0 11.90/0 11.8% 9,325 954,964 36,482,729 65 to 74 Years 7.5% 6.9% 7.0% 5,859 549,804 21 713,429 75 Years and Over 5.2% 5.3% 6.0% 4,095 427,133 18,554,555 Race: White 89.3% 68.6% 72.4% 69,934 5 486 852 223,553 65 Race: Black or African American 4.1% 19.4% 12.6% 3,175 1,551,399 38,929,319 Race: American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% 0.4% 0.90/0 234 29,225 2,932,248 Race: Asian 1.2% 5.5% 4.8% 969 439,890 14,674,252 Race: Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 34 5,980 540,013 Race: Some Other Race 3.0% 3.2% 6.2% 2,379 254,278 19 107 368 Race: Two or More Races 2.0% 2.9% 2.9% 1,580 233,40 9,009,073 Hispanic or Latino of any race 6.6% 7.9% 16.3% 5,168 631,825 50,477,594 Ec nomic Labor Force Participation Rate and Size (civilian Al ulation 16 years and over)4 67.2% 64.8% 63.5% 42,542 4,229,948 157,940,014 ed Forces Labor Force 0.1% 1.7% 0.4% 79 108,658 1 025 497 Veterans, Age 18-64 9.0% 9.1°/n 5.8°/n 4,449 470,379 11,371,344 Median Household Income , - - -- $68,719 S64 792 $53 482 Poverty Level of all eo is 5.9% 11.5% 15.6°/n 4,641 914,237 47,755,606 Mean Commute Time minutes - -- - 30.0 27.8 25.7 Commute via Public Transportation 0.3% 4.5% 5.1% 118 178,442 7,157,671 Union Membership" 3.4% 4.7% 11.1% - - - Housin Total Housing Units -- -- -- 31,877 3,403,241 132,741,033 Median House Value of owner -occupied units)',' - -- - $223 300 $243 500 $175 700 Homeowner Vacancy4 2.5% 1.8% 2.1% 579 37,033 1,591,421 Rental Vacancy' 3.2% 6.4% 6.9% 220 71,372 3,105,361 Renter -Occupied Housing Units % of Occupied Units 22.3% 33.3% 35.6% 6,502 1,013,466 41,423,632 Occupied Housing Units w/no Vehicle Available (% of Occupied Units 4 o 3.8/0 0 6.4/n 9.1% 1 116 194 ,153 10,594,153 Social 2 o High School Diploma (educational attainment, age 10 7% 9.90/0 12.0 /° 0 4,652 439,874 19,939,890 High School Graduate (educational attainment, age 25- 64)4 28.9% 23.9% 26.5% 12,534 1,062,241 44,000,387 Some College, No Degree (educational attainment, age 25-64 21.7°/n 20.6% 21.9% 9,437 914,402 36,270,359 Associate's Degree educational attainment age 25-64 8.2% 7.7% 8.7% 3,571 342,942 14,487,486 Bachelor's Degree educational attainment age 25-644 19.3% 22.3% 19.7% 8,386 991,434 32 646,533 Post ad Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 11.1 % 15.5% 11.2% 4,836 689,184 18,533,513 Enrolled in Grade 12 % ofpopulation)' 1.7% 1.3% 1.4% 1,344 107,840 4,443,768 Disabled Age 18-64 10.0% 9.1% 10.2% 4,895 460,216 19,703 061 orei Born 5.8% 11.6% 13.1% 4,657 948,484 41,056,885 Source: )S)hj' tQ`. 1. Census 2010, unless otherwise noted 2. Census 2015, anmal avenge growth rate since 2005 3. Median values for certain aggregate regions (Le. MSAs) may be estimated as weighted avenes g of median values from cornpoamg counties 4. ACS 2010-2014 5. 2014; Current Population Survey, unbmtats.com, and Chmun; county -and zip -level data County of Frederick, VA 209 FY 2016 - 2017 CA Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts 0 • THE CIP TABLE CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Department Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contribution- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs- The cost for each project, including county allocations and other • funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in the 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project cost to the county of $1,015,369,550. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the county. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. • The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an • indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. 21 Cn County Total Project' Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes: Costs Projects '2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Ensuing. Fiscal Year, Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ Public Schools " ., $1,600,000 $30,800;000 $32,400,000 $32,400,000 Elementary S6hool#12 mm "° Anne(Elemeri_ tary.School Addition and, Renovation - Robert E. Aylor Middle School $1,400,000 $10,730,000 $8,970,000 $9,900,000 $31,000,000 '$31,000,0.00 Addition and Renovation . $1,700,000 $35,500,000 �$32,200,000 __.. .. . -$19,400,000 — $3,100,000 - $91,900,000 $91,900,000 _..... FourthH. School i9_ _.__.. _ _ . _ _ _ James Wood High School Renov. � . - — - -- (Prior to FY2015-2016 Cost) TBD TBD Sherando High School Parking .Lot -- — — 8, Softball Field_ Improvements ; TBD TBD Dowell J. Howard Center Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Apple Pie'Ridge Elementary - Phase 2 Renovation _.._ ._ ..._. _. .-.__. .._ _ . - $8,900,000 $8,900,000 $8,900,000 Bass Hoover Elementary _ Phase 2 Renovation $9,000,000 $9,000,000 `'$9,000,000 County/SchooiBoard' Adrp n!W"#on Building. _.... TBD .' TBD Indian Hollow Elementary _ Addition and Renovation $24,700,000 TBD $24,700,000 TBD $24,700,000 ElementarySchool #13 Fifth Middle School $49,500,000 $49,500,000 $49,500,000 $4,700,000 $77,030,000 $41,170,000 $29,300,D00 $0 $92,100,000 $247,400,000 - $247,400,000 Parks & Recreation _ - _ _— _ _ _.____..._.._ Clearbrodt & Sherando - Water Si'afe/Spray Ground. $1;352,000 — _T $ ,352,000 " $1,352,000 Sherando Access Road w/Parkingrrrails $1;567,000 $480,0 - $14,683,000 $1,567,000 $1,567,000 $15,163,000 IndoorAqualic Facility _, .__--- $15,163,000 Snowden Bridge Park Development $3161,000 _ $682 000 ;`_ ._....._._._.__.. _ T r...__ $3,161,000 m$682000 $3,161,000 Sherando11 y Softball Complex . I. Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $85,000 $148,000 _ $103,000$1281000 $2 702 000 $2,935,000 $2,935,000 $1,384,000, Sherando Iake(lrailslParkrng 2,Fields $1,384,000 Community Parks (3) $6 352,000 $2,285,000 __ _ _.._ ._ _._....__. _ , $6,352,000 $6,352,000 $2,285,000 Neighborhood PaAcs'3 O _ _..__ $2,285,000 -__ District Parks (4) $15 717,000 $15,717,000 $15,717,000 Picrnc Areas Sherando _____ _______._ ____ $_818,000 5818,000 $818,000 Indoor Ice Rink - --- $6,102,000 _ $6,102,000 00— $6,102,0 58,952,000 Commurnty,Center S8 952,000 _ $8,952,000 Clearbrook Open Play Areas $487,000 $1,300,000 $487,000 — $1,300 000 $487,000 $1,300,000 Baseball Fekl.Lig_k.g Upgrade Soccer/Multi Use Fields .. _ ; $1,141,000 $1,141 000 ,. $1,141,000 $535,000 ' learbrook... TennistBaskeltLall,Complex' $535000 __._ $535000 Sherando Skateboard Park :. $522,000 $517,000 $522,000 - - $517,000 $522,000 000 Clearb._ : _, Shelter Stage. .. Fleet Trip Vehicles $295,000 $295,000 000 i v County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes, Coats Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Sherdndo Maintenance Compound - $381,000 $381,000 5381,000 $6,645,000 $24,253,000 $35,572,000 $3,985,000 $1,193,000 $0 $71,648,000 $71,648,000 RegionalLibrary____ �—_- - ____ Geinesboro Library _.___ _ _ __ - ---- $155,023 — ------ $1,465,736 --- -- -- 5128,275 - - - --- ,-- ------, -----_ - .- 51,749,034 --- -- ---..----- $1,749,034 Senseny/Greemwod Library TBD TBD TBD TBD Route 522 South Ubre nch SO $155,023 $1,465,736 $128,275 SO $o $1,749,034 $1,749,034 Transportation Funded Pi ties 1-81 Exit 310 Improvements $49,121,000 $49,121,000 E $49,121,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 1) _ $36,082,000 $36,082,000 E $36,082,000 East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over 81 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 E $6,000,000 tfifunded Prlorftles . Route 37 Engineering & Constructor $300,000,000 $60,000,000 $300,000,000 E 5300,000,o00 $60,000,000 1 l31 Exit 30T Relocation $601000,000 E Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 2) $15,000,000 $15,000,000 _--1 $2,500,000 E -i - E $15,000,000 $2,500,000 Redbud Road Realignment $2,500,000 Warrior Drive Extension $23,200,000 $23,200,000 E $23,200,000 Channiny Drive Extension $20,600,000 $20,800,000 E $20,600,000 Bruoetown/Hopewell Realign. $3,000,000 $47,800,000 $3,000,000 $47,600,000 E E $3,000,000 $47,800,000 _ _-- Widenlny of Route 11 North -- — Senseny Road Widening Mvedee Way-: _ $22,800,000 _.-_----__.------.---- a10,200,000 $22,800,000 E $22,6D0,000 $10,200,000 ---- _.-- $10,200,000 _--- E Fox Drive $250.000 $250,000 E $250,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 ken naisance Drive E Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD TBD $300,000.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $298,553,001) $598,553,D00 $598,553,000 Winchester Airport --- "—" '- New General Avaiation Terminal $380,000 - $2.600,000 AB $2,980,000 Northside Connector $1,250,000 A,B $1,250,000 NewTermirel Parking Lot $650,000 A,B $650,000 Land Parcel64-A-66 $275,000 — A,B $275,000 - Lend Parcel64-A-67 $275,000 --- A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-33A $175.000 --- - A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-60 --- $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-40 $175,000 A,B $175,000 Lend Parcel 64-A-84 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Fuel Storage Facility S1,000,000 A,B $1,000,000 ------------ Land Paroel bIB A 47 -- -- -- - - _ $300.000 --- -- - - _ - - - -- - - --A,B 5300,000 Land Parcel 64-A-49 — -- - - $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Peroe164-A--50- $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 1 $235,0001 1 A,B $235,000 0 0 County Total Project' Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes, Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Land Parcel 64B-A-52,_ Land Parcel 64-A-59 $.300,000 $300,000 $400,000 $200,000 $4,650,000 $4,800,000 A,B A,B A,B A,B $300,000 $300,000 $400,000 $9,650,000 North Side Svc Road Taxiway "A" Relocation $2,660,000 $1,655,000 $3,250.000 $2,100,000 $4,650,000 $4,800,000 $0 '$19,115,000 County Administration $418 850 50 $442,850 E $377,850 $442,850 , '.$349,550 $1,000,000 TB - $24,065,500 Clearbroak Convemerx:e Site Albin Convenience Site -520,000 , - $200,000 TBD $C,065,500 - $357 850 $24 000 $200,000 _ Relate' nslon Gore Site . t!a!lPa _- General Govemment Capital Exp 324 000 $200,000 _ $325,550 $200,000 _ -_ $200,000 ___._--_-.._..__ _ ___- $20,000,000 -.. _ $349,550 $1,000,000 TBD $24,065,500 E E E _ - County/Sthool Board Administration Building, Joint Judicial Center Renovation / New Facility Fire &Rescue $4,285,5001 $581,850 $642,850 $525,550 $200,000 $20,000,000 $26,235.750 $26,235,750 $3,400 000 $905,000 - $3.700.000 $31,175,000 _ � $3,400,000 $905,000 $3,700,000 $31,175,000 $3,750,000 ` $4,396,000 _ Fire & Rescue Statlort:#22.(277) -- F&R Station #22 (277) Apparatus 0,000 $40 $100;00o $75,000 $33,000 $1500,000 $805,000 $1,500;000 _ $4150.000 $1,250,000 4$1,000,000 $10,000 000 - - $9,500,000 - $10,250,000 y Fire B Rescue Station.#23 .._ Regional Training Center $550,000 $100 000 Fire &Rescue Station #24 (Gainesboro). Station #13 (Clearbmok) Relocation 0 $88,000 $350Q $4,275,000 $4,396,000 C,750,000 E Fire &Rescue Company $608,000 Capital Requests Fire &Rescue Capital Eguipmerit _ '. 5200 000 ' See Fire & Rescue Company Requests (e$100K) $3,293,000 $12,675,000 $11,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 47,326,000 :$47,326,000 " $200,000 $200.000 6.._..__- $200 000 $200,000 _...__..n.___._ $1,000A00 _____ E - - 51,000,000 ' $550,000 $550,000 Apparatus Ventilation System for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. Office an Living Quarters for Greenwood Vol. Fire &Rescue Co. $550,000 $550,,000 ._ 00 $00,000 $800,000 C C :_C C $550,000 $550,000 --T� - ; $100,000 $800,000 - $100,000 $800,000 Life Packd x3 for;Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co Rescue Engine Replacement for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $342,766 North Mountain Fire & Rescue Co.Buildi anslon $342,766 C _ :. $342,768 -- $2,542,766 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $3,342,766 $3342,766 $32.1,441,266 $107,167.873 $94,975.586 $47.238.825 $15,743,000 $425,703,000 $996,254,550 $1015,369,s50 ?atat - - - * Fire & Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests (<$10019 None _ A= Partial funding from VA Dept of Aviation NIA= Not Available B= Partial funding from FAA TBD-- To be Determined t= Partial funding from private donations D- Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sourms F= FtaxFrtg initiated prior to displayed 5 year � • i 0 0 • • Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables 0 0 Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Home/Other otals Frederick CoMy Public Schools Development Assessment Southern Hills Phase H July 22, 2016 Student Generation Housing Units# 130 0 0 0 130 School Cost Program Capacity Per Student Cost Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Elementary School Student Generation 25 0 0 0 25 tal Costs Elementary School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $24,700,000 850 $29,059 25 $726,000 Middle School Student Generation High School Student Generation 12 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 14 Middle School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $49,500,000 940 $52,660 12 $632,000 High School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $91,900,000 1,725 $53,275 14 $746,000 Total Student Generation 51 0 0 0 Total Capital Costs $2,104,000 • 0 u • Annual Operational Costs FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Total Student Annual Budget) Generation Impact This Development's Impact on FCPS Operational Costs $11,584 51 $591,000 Average Annual Operational Cost Per Unit � — School Facility Information Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) 2016-17 School Attendance Zone* Bass -Hoover RE. Aylor Sherando June 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 1,518 2016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 1,400 * - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. # - Using applicant`s assumptions regarding number of housing units. Is • 9 • US Census Bureau Household and Families Document • • • Table 2. Households by Type: 2000 and 2010 (For Information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling errors, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prodlcen20101doclsfl.pdh Household type 2000 2010 Change, 2000 to 2010 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total households .................... 105,480,101 100.0 116,716,292 100.0 11,236,191 10.7 Family household .......................... 71,787,347 68.1 77538296 66.4 5,750,949 8.0 Husband -wife households ................. 54,493,232 51.7 56:510:377 48.4 2,017,145 3.7 With own children ...................... 24,835,605 23.5 23.588,268 20.2 -1,247,237 -5.0 Without own children ................... 29,657,727 28.1 32,922,109 28.2 3,264,382 11.0 Female householder, no spouse present...... 12,900,103 12.2 15,250,349 13.1 2,350,246 18.2 With own children ...................... 7,561,874 7.2 8,365,912 7.2 804,038 10.6 Without own children ................... 5,338,229 5.1 6,884,437 5.9 1,546,208 29.0 Male householder, no spouse present........ 4,394,012 4.2 5,777,570 5.0 1,383,558 31.5 With own children ...................... 2,190,989 2.1 2,789,424 2.4 598,435 27.3 Without own children ................... 2,203,023 2.1 2,988,146 2.6 785,123 35.6 Nonfamily households ...................... 33,692,754 31.9 39,177,996 33.6 5,485,242 16.3 Male householder ....................... 15,556,103 14.7 18,459,253 15.8 2.903,150 18.7 Living alone .......................... 11,779,106 11.2 13,906,294 11.9 2,127,188 18.1 Not living alone ........................ 3,776,997 3.6 4,552,959 3.9 775,962 20.5 Female householder ..................... 18,136,651 17.2 20,718,743 17.8 2,582,092 14.2 Living alone .......................... 15,450,969 14.6 17,298,615 14.8 1,847,646 12.0 Not living alone ........................ 2.685,682 2.5 3.420,128 2.9 734,446 27.3 Unmarried couple households' ............... 5,476,768 5.2 7,744,711 6.6 2,268,943 41.4 Opposite -sex partners .................... 4,881,377 4.6 6,842,714 5.9 1,961,337 40.2 Same -sex partners2 Summary File 1 counts ................. 594,391 0.6 901,997 0.8 307,606 51.8 Preferred estimates .................... 358,390 0.3 646,464 0.6 288,074 80.4 Average household size ................... 2.59 (X) 2.58 (X) - 0.01 (X) Average family size ........................ 1 3.141 Ni3.141 NI 0.00 (X) (X) Not applicable. I Unmarried couple households can be family or nonfamily households depending on the relationship of others in the household to the householder. In this table, It Is the sum of opposite -sex partners and same -sox partners from Summary File 1 counts. 2 Summary File 1 counts In this table are consistent with Summary File 1 counts shown In American FactFinder. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File i and 2010 Census Summary Flle 1. average household size decreased over the decade, from 2.59 to 2.58, but average family size stayed the same, 3.14.6 These indicators show a slowing of the downward trends that have existed since the end of the Baby Boom in the 1960s. In 1960, the average house- hold size was 3.29 people per 6 Average family size Is the number of family members in the household (persons related to the householder Including the householder) per family household. This computation excludes persons not related to the householder. household, and the average family size was 3.65 people per family.' The number of households within each category type increased in the last 10 years, including husband - wife households, which increased r Average household size for 1960 may be found In Frank Hobbs and Nicole Stoops, "Demographic Trends In the 20th Century," Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-4 (November 2002), Figure 5-3. Average family size for 1960 may be found in U.S. Census Bureau, 1960 Census of Population, Supplementary Reports, PC(S1)-38, Families In the United States: 1960, Table 280. by 2.0 million. Figure 2 shows that, despite this increase, in 2010 less than half of all households (48 per- cent) were husband -wife house- holds, down from 52 percent in 2000 and 55 percent in 1990. This is the first time that husband -wife families fell below 50 percent of all households in the United States since data on families were first U.S. Census Bureau is 0 • AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 17, 2007 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: February 28, 2007 APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING #22-06 OF SOUTHERN HILLS WHEREAS, Rezoning #22-06 of Southern Hills, submitted by William H. Gordon -Associates, Inc., to rezone 15.53916 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District with proffers, and 90 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, for residential and commercial uses, was considered. The properties are located approximately 2,800 feet south of the intersection of Route 277 and Town Run Lane, in the Opequon Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 85D-I-1-1 through 85D-1-1- 95B and 85-A-138. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 17, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on February 28, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 15.53916 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District with proffers, and 90 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, for residential and commercial uses, as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owners. PDRes. H 10-07 u 0 This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 28th day of February, 2007 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Gary Dove Gene E. Fisher Philip A. Lemieux Aye Barbara E. Van Osten Aye Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Aye A COPY ATTEST Jo 4ey, Jr.- - l/ ` Fr deo k County Administrator • • 17-j PDRes. # 10-07 • • • PROFFER STATEMENT Southern Hilty .Subdivision Rezonin>7: Rezoning Application No. 22-06. Rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) (90 acres) and B2 Commercial (15.54 acres). Property: See Attachment A for Property Identification Nos. (Opequon Magisterial District) Record DYvner: Arcadia Development Co.; Arcadia -Southern Hills, L.L.C.; Southern Hills Homeowners Association, inc. Applicant: Arcadia Development Co. Project Name: Southern Hills Original Date of Proffers: June 6, 2001 Revision Date: January 31, 2007 Preliminary lWatters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 et. seq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the applicable provisions of the. Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional rezoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia shall approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06 for the rezoning of 105.511 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) [90 acres] acid B2 Commercial [15.54 acres] with revised proffers, development of the subject property shall he done in conformity with the terns and conditions set fotth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever and all proffers currently in effect oil the subject property as of the date this document was executed by the applicant shall continue in Rill force and effect. These proffers shall be binding on the applicant and its legal successors and assigns. • l4onetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development The undersigned, who owns the above -described property, hereby voluntarily proffers • that if the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia approves the rezoning for the approximately 105 acres, with frontage along Town Run Lane in the. Opequon Magisterial District of Frederick County, Virginia front Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP)190 acres] and B2 Commercial [15.54 acres], the undersigned will pay to Frederick County at the time a building permit is applied for and issued the sum of $4,910.00 per residential lot. This monetary proffer provides for S3,581.00 for Frederick County Schools; $598.00 for Frederick County Parks and Recreation; S446.00 for Frederick County Fire and Rescue; $105.00 for Public Library; $59.00 for Sheriff's Office and $121.00 for Administration Building. General Development Plan Should the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06, then in such event development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the attached voluntarily -proffered revised Generalized Development Plan including the following improvements; On the 90 acres to be zoned RP no more than 88 single-family detached urban residence units and no more than 232 tow-nhouse units shall be constructed. The balance of the property zoned 132 commercial shall be developed in accordance with the uses specified in the B2 commercial zoning district. The development of the public street network shall be in general coufonuance with the revised Generalized Development Plan dated October. 2006. 2. Stickley Drive (SR 1085) shall be extcndcd as shown to connect with Town Run Lane (SR 1012) during the first phase of development (A to B). 3. Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be overlayed with a bituminous concrete surface from B to C. Guard rail shall be installed right and left along Town Run Lane "fill" areas greater than 7' vertical. The improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of work. This work shall be done prior to the issuance of the 50`h building permit. 4. Town Rum Lane (SR 1012) shall be overlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface fronn C to D during the phase where the entrance at "D" is constructed. These improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of the work. 5. An easement shall be established 75' in depth along the South properly line b to F. This easement will be prominently shown on the final plat and will restrict construction of homes as well as limitink the clear cutting of trees larger than 4" diameter. [This proffer was fulfilled and recorded on the Southern Hills Subdivision Phase I Final Subdivision Plat, bistrulnent No.060011588.] r] • • 6. A statement shall be added to the plat and covenants for all lots created by this • project advising that agricultural uses exist on the South and East, the Ewing Family cemetery exists within the limits of development, and wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of this site. 7. The 1 wing Family cemetery will be set aside as a separate lot with public access via an appropriate easement(s) and conveyed, if possible, to the Ewing family with covenants for future maintenance by the Fwing family. 8. A contribution of 100,000 for construction funding shall be made at the time VDOT implements the construction of a stoplight at the intersection of Stickley Drive and Ric. 277. [This proffer was fulfilled on March 3, 2005) 9. The Property Owner agrees to dedicate the right-of-way as shown on the revised Generalized Development Plan for the future Warrior Drive extension (the "road") across that portion of the Owner's property zoned B2 Commercial in the location depicted on the Generalized Development Plan. The Property Owner agrees to dedicate the right-of-way for the road within ninety (90) days of a written request by the County, provided that Rezoning Application No. 22-06 has been approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors and all applicable appeal periods have expired and no appeal has been filed. The Owner's dedication of the tight -of -way for the road is further conditioned on the following: (a) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a covenant running with the land, granting the Owner the right, at any time in the future and at Owner's expense, to place underground utilities across, or parallel • to, the dedicated sigh. -of -way for the road (including, but not limited to, gas, electric, cable, telephone, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterline); (b) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a covenant running with the land, requiring that the road shall have, at the Owner's discretion, a minimum of two entrances from the north side of Warrior Drive into the Owner's proposed commercial development, which two entrances shall meet applicable VDOT and County regulations and entrance spacing standards and be engineered into the design of the road, with turning lanes as required, for the full development of the subject property, during the design phase of the road; and requiring that the Owner and/or its designated representative(s) be entitled to meaningfully participate in the designs of the road as regards the location and design of the two entrances; and (c) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a covenant nrnning wilh the land, granting the Owner, its successors and assigns, the right at any timc(s) in the future, to establish and locate construction and/or grading easements over and across the dedicated right- of-way in locations determined by the Owner, its successors and assigns, to be necessary for the development of the B2 Commercial property and/or the Residential Performance (RP) property provided that, upon construction of the road as a public street accepted into the state highway system by VDOT, the language regarding easements contained in this subparagraph 9 (c) shall thereupon be considered void. 0 10. Owner agrees that no greater than ten percent (10%) of the 676,885 maximum • allowable commercial square footage in the B2 zone shall be. constructed before the portion of the Warrior Drive extension road traversing Owner's property is constructed. l 1. Owner agrees to limit residential building permits on the Property to a maximum of seventy-five (75) pen -nits per year, on a calendar basis commencing January 1, 2007, provided however that any unissued (but otherwise allowable) yearly pennits will accumulate to Owner's benefit for subsequent years. For example, is Owner pulls only 50 building permits in 2007, Owner shall be entitled to 100 permits in 2008; should Owner pull only 50 permits in 2008, Owner shall be entitled to 125 pennits in 2009. Residential building permits issues prior to January 1, 2007 are not to be considered apart of this proffer. The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the Applicant and Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants said rezoning and accepts these conditions, the proffered conditions shall supersede all previous proffered conditions applicable to the Property and shall apply to the Property rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully submitted, ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. • Property Owner , By: . Its: Vf(�`�r1�t17f Date: ARCADIA-SOUTHERN HILLS, L.L.C. Prop ' Owner Its: min Date: 41t lei SOU" RN HILLS HOMEOWNIERS ASSOCIATION, INC. i Y:_ — Its Date:�I 9 IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Current O�% ner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt. Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 \\ indv Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt(a greenw ayeng.com Greenmay Engineering • June 30, 201E Arcadia Communities. L.L.C. Rezoning SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by the proffered rezoning of a 40.36±-acre subject property owned by Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner"). The subject property is identified as Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, which is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The subject property is split -zoned and is comprised of 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57i acres of B .2, Business General District. The subject property is a component of a 105± acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01-01) and subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36f-acre subject property to maintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business Gcneral District land area, and to modify the proffer statement to limit development of the 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District to a maxinnunn of 130 single- family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' right-of-way area within the 2.57± acre B-2, Business General District portion of the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to accommodate the filture extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered under Rezoning Application #22- 06. Basic information Location: Fronting on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) Magisterial District: Opequon District • Tax Map Parcel Number: 85D-1-1-95 File #3126V Impact Analysis Slatement/EAW 2 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Current Zoning: RP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) is B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Current Use: Undeveloped (Note: Single-family detached residential lots platted and some lots developed in Southern Hills — Phase 1) Proposed Zoning: RP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Proposed Use: Single -Family Detached Residential Lots (RP District) Public Street Reservation Area (B2 District) Total Rezoning Area: 40.36±-acres with revised proffers for the subject property COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Urban Development Area The Urban Development Area (UDA) defines the general area in which residential, commercial, industrial and institutional land use development is encouraged in the County. The 40.36±-acre subject property is currently located within the UDA; therefore, expansion of the UDA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of single-family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the future extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Sewer and Water Service Area The Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) is generally consistent with the UDA, but also extends outside of the UDA to accommodate areas of the County in which commercial and industrial land use development is only desired. The 40.36±-acre subject property is currently located within the SWSA; therefore, expansion of the SWSA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of single-family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the future extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Comprehensive Plan Conformity The 40.36±-acre subject property is located in the UDA and the SWSA and is within the study area boundary of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan is a large -area plan that identifies land uses, transportation networks, and other matters that are recommended for consideration for future land use and development within this geographic area of the County. The 40.361-acre subject property is identified for residential • and business land use; therefore, the proposed RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, File #3126V Impact Analysis StatemcnUEAW 3 0 • Grcenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Business General District rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan Transportation Map identifies a new minor arterial road system that traverses the subject property. The alignment of the new minor arterial road is located within the B-2, Business General District portion of the subject property, which has been identified as a public street reservation area; therefore, the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The 40.36±-acre subject property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). Access to the single-family detached residential lots will be provided along Town Run Lane and through a system of public streets internal to the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the subject property. The single-family detached residential lots will not have access from the B-2, Business General District portion of the subject property that has been established by deed as a fuhlre public street reservation area. Flood Plains • The 40.36f-acre subject property contains a small area of floodplain within the B-2, Business General District portion of the subject property along the eastern property line that is associated with Stephens Run. The subject property is located within FEMA NFIP Map #51069C0330D, Effective Date September 2, 2009, and is primarily located within Flood Zone X with the exception of the small area of floodplain within the B-2, Business General District portion of the subject property. The single-family detached residential lots proposed for Southern Hills — Phase 2 are located completely outside of the floodplain limits. Wetlands The 40.36f-acre subject property does not contain wetland areas as demonstrated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map information from the Frederick County GIS Database. However, the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007 identifies delineated wetland areas along the southern boundary of the subject property. The delineated wetland areas are located within the open space portion of the subject property and will not be impacted by the developed of the single-family detached residential lots proposed for Southern Hills — Phase 2. Soil Types The 40.36f-acre subject property contains three soil types as demonstrated by the Soil • Survey of Frederick County, Virginia and the Frederick County GIS Database. The following soil type is present on site: File 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/EA"' 4 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning 9B: Clearbrook Channery Silt Loams 2-7% slopes 32C: Blaii-ton Silt Loams 7-15% slopes 41 C/D/E: Weikert-Becks Channery Silt Loams 7-65% slopes None of the soil types within the subject property are identified as a prime agricultural soil and all types have high shrink/swell properties. The 40.36±-acre subject property has similar soil conditions as Southern Hills — Phase 1, which has been developed with public streets and single-family detached residential lots. Other Environmental Features The 40.36±-acre subject property does not contain areas of steep slope, lakes or ponds or natural stormwater retention areas as defined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and as delineated on the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007. There are no known environmental features present that create development constraints for the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2. ADJOINING PROPERTIES Adjoining_ property zoning and present use: • North: B-2, Business General District Use: Unimproved South: RP, Residential Performance District Use: Southern Hills — Phase 1 East: RP, Residential Performance District Use: Southern Hills — Phase I West: RA, Rural Areas District Use: Unimproved TRANSPORTATION The 40.36±-acre subject property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The subject property is generally identified as Southern Hills — Phase 2 (the middle section of the Southern Hills Subdivision). Frederick County originally approved Rezoning Application #01-01, which established RP, Residential Performance District zoning over the 105± acre parent tract that includes the 40.36± acre subject property. The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning required the 105± acre property to be developed as single family lots and included several off -site transportation improvements. Subsequently, Frederick County • approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained the single family lots within File #3126V Impact Analysis SlalemenUEAW 5 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities. L.L.C. Rezoning • Southern Hills - Phase I and modified the remainder of the project area to allow for 232 tOW1111ouSe lots within SOuthern Hills — Phase 2 and to allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of' the project (SOutllel'11 Hills — Phase 3). The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning carried forward the transportation improvements from the original ])]-offers, restricted the Southern Hills - Phase 2 Land Bay to townhouse lots, and provided for a 100' right-of-way area between the townhouses and the commercial land bay to accommodate the future extension Of South Warrior Drive to the f iture Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. The original property owner implemented the proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application 401-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06. These transportation improvements are identified on the Transportation Proffer Compliance Map Exhibit and include the following: Completion Of the extension of Sticklcy Drive (Route 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). :- Installation of' guardrail along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. Completion of new surface material overlay of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. i Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). • The 40.36± acre subject property is inclusive of the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Land Bay that is approved for 232 townhouse lots; as well as the 100' right-of-way area to accommodate the future extension Of South Warrior Drive. The Owner has reserved the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Proffer Statement. This public street reservation is legally recorded by deed and plat as Instrument No. 160002930/0001, which is included as information in the proposed rezoning application. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 tOWI111OLISC lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed traffic impacts associated With this rezoning request: EXISTING IMPACTS: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD PROPOSED IMPACTS: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD REDUCED IMPACT: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 505 VPD The Southern I -fills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application has provided for the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to ensure this is available to • Frederick County and VDOT for the extension Of South Warrior Drive as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Proffer Statement, and previous development activities associated with Pile 1I3126V Impact Analysis Stalemcnt/EAW 6 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning the Southern Hills — Phase 1 Land Bay have implemented all other transportation improvements. Additionally, the proposed rezoning application results in a reduction of 505 vehicles per day that reduces impacts to the Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085) intersection. Therefore, the proposed rezoning application adequately mitigates transportation impacts to Frederick County. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public sewer based on County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider of public sewer service within this area of the County and currently has sewer infrastructure within Southern Hills — Phase 1 that includes gravity sewer lines, a pump station and a four -inch sewer force main that directs effluent to a 15-inch sewer transmission line to the Parkins Mill Treatment Facility (PMTF). The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/day per residential connection is an appropriate calculation for estimating the sewer demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed sewer demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 30,600 GPD of sewer demand from the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The sewer system design for Southern Hills — Phase 2 will incorporate an on -site gravity collection system that directs effluent fi•orn the single-family detached residential lots to the existing FCSA pump station located immediately east of the subject property. The existing pump station was designed, approved and constructed as a 0.135 MGD facility. The • projected sewer demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots within File #3126V Impact Analysis StatemenUEAW 7 • • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning • Southern Hills — Phase 1 and the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is approximately 50% of the design capacity of the existing FCSA pump station. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application can be accommodated by the existing FCSA sewer system infrastructure. WATER SUPPLY The 40.36i-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public water based on County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider of public water service within this area of the County and has an existing 12" water line located along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) that provides public water to the property. Additionally, a 12' water line and an 8" water line have been constructed within Southern Hills Phase I that extend to the Southern Hills — Phase 2 property. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/day per residential connection is an appropriate calculation for estimating the water demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed water demands for the 40.36f subject site are as follows: • EXISTING DEMAND: Sollthcl'I] Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected water demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected water demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 30,600 GPD of water demand from the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The water system Clesign for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 single-family detached residential lots will expand on the existing water system that was developed for Southern Hills — Phase 1. This design will provide for water line looping to ensure that adequate water pressure is • available for residential service and for fire flow. The projected water demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 1 and the File 113126V Impact Analysis StatemenUEAW Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is a reduction of 30,600 GPD below the projected water needs for the subject property. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application can be accommodated by FCSA and by the existing water system infrastructure. SITE DRAINAGE The 40.36::L-acre subject property has a drainage divide that directs drainage to the east and to the south to defined channels that flow into Stephens Run. The proposed single-family detached residential lots will be developed as curb and gutter streets and will incorporate stormwater management design that will include stormwater detention ponds on the eastern and southern portion of the subject property on the upper side of the Stephens Run drainage channels. Storinwater quality measures will be evaluated during the Subdivision Design Plan process and will be achieved through on -site quality measures or a combination of on -site quality measures and nutrient credits if necessary. The stormwater quantity and quality measures will be designed in conformance with all applicable state and local regulations; therefore, site drainage and stormwater management impacts to adjoining properties and the community will be adequately mitigated. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL • The impact on solid waste disposal associated with the development of the 40.36± subject site can be projected from an average annual residential consumption of 5.4 cubic yards per household (Civil Engineering Reference Manual, 4°1 Edition). The Frederick County Public Works Department is responsible for solid waste disposal as the manager of the Regional Landfill Facility. Existing and proposed solid waste disposal demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected solid waste demand is as follows: AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 232 residential units AV = 1,253 Cu. Yd. at residential build -out, or 877 tons/yr at build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected solid waste demand is as follows: AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 130 residential units AV = 702 Cu. Yd. at residential build -out, or 491 tons/yr at build -out File #3126V Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 9 Greenway Engineering June 30. 201E Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning • REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 386 tons/yr of solid waste demand from the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill has a current remaining capacity of 13,100,000 cubic yards of air space. The projected buildout of Southern Hills — Phase 2 will generate approximately 491 tons of solid waste annually on average. This represents a 0.24% increase in the annual solid waste received by the Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill, which currently averages 200,000 tons per year and is a reduction from the annual solid waste disposal that would otherwise occur under the existing residential land use plan. The Regional Landfill has adequate capacity to accommodate the solid waste impacts associated with this proposal. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify structures deemed to be historically significant on the 40.36f-acre subject property, nor does the survey identify properties within proximity of this site that are deemed potentially significant. The closest potentially significant structure is identified as the Wise-Ritenour House (34-1209), which is • located approximately 0.3 miles southeast of the subject property. The National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify the 40.36±-acre subject property as being located within defined Civil War Battlefield study area boundaries. Therefore, the proposed single-family detached residential lot development plan for the subject property will not create negative impacts associated with historic resources. COMMUNITY FACILITY IMPACTS The 40.36f-acre subject property is a component of a 105t acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01- 01) and subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). Rezoning Application #22-06 was approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots, while the proposed Rezoning Application would reduce this impact through the proffered maximum development of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Rezoning Application #22-06 provides for a total monetary contribution value of $1,139,120.00 to offset impacts to community facilities. The proposed Rezoning Application maintains this Same level of funding to offset impacts to community facilities even though this proposal demonstrates a reduction of more than 100 residential lots. The Owner's . Proffer Statement requires the inclusion of a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot that Pile 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/EAW 10 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Conununities, L.L.C. Rezoning equates to the total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 divided by the total number of • single-family detached residential lots. This approach ensures that the Owner will provide the same level of funding to offset impacts to community facilities regardless if the total number of lots falls below the maximum 130 single-family detached residential lots identified in the proposed Proffer Statement. The school student generation impact to Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) is calculated by the County Development Impact Model (CDIM). Currently, the CDIM projects single-family detached residential land use at 0.40 students per household (SFD = 0.19 Elementary School Students; 0.10 Middle School Students; 0.11 High School Students) and projects townhouse residential land use at 0.27 students per household (TH = 0.13 Elementary School Students; 0.07 Middle School Students; 0.07 High School Students). Existing and proposed school student generation impact to FCPS is as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the school student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 63 students. PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the school student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 52 students. REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 11 school students that will be generated fi•om the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. OTHER POTENTIAL IMPACTS The Ewing Family Cemetery is located within the southeastern portion of the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Proffer Statements associated with Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 provided for the creation of a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the property; as well as an access easement fi-om the public street to the cemetery that would be maintained by the Ewing Family. The proposed Proffer Statement provides for this same commitment; therefore, there are no impacts associated with the Ewing Family Cemetery that will result fi•om the development of single family detached residential lots on the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre subject property to maintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District land area, and to modify the proffer statement to limit development of the 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District to a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' right-of-way area within the 2.57± acre B-2, Business General District portion of the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to is File #3126V Impact Analysis Statenlent/EAW 11 Grccnway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia C'ommunitics, L.L.C. Ruoning :7 • accommodate the fLItLll'e extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered under Rezoning Application #22-06. This Rezoning Application results in a reduction of total Vehicle trips, a 1'eCIL1CtlOn Of sewer demand, a reduction of water demand, a reduction Of solid waste demand, and a reduction of school students, while illallltalll the same level of' funding to offset impacts to community facilities proffered under Rooming Application #22-06. The Owner's Proffer Statement provides assurances for these reductions and for this funding commitment; therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application has adequately mitigated impacts to Frederick County. Attachments: Aerial Overview A9cip l vliihil Southern Frederick Area Plan Lund Use Allup i vhihil Locution and Zoning Map 1-.vhihil I'r-crnshoi-talion ProlhIr Compliance I vhihit Si,I,'SA &, UDA Map E.vhihit Enviromnenlal Features Allap 1:avhihit FLA1If1 FIRAII Map E-xhihil Soils Map ITYNhit Historic Features Allap l,.xhihil File i13126V Impact Analysis SlatcmcnUGAW 12 •,� It `A�J} ;�� ' + +�' .6 i-:k,� y` ��`'ic� . Tr r w •t .' 1. y r,. •+.» ', % '�+`� ��� Q' RID_G~E•FIELD AVE Lu •�•I., � � �' • •�, � � � � i�. `• '%•r �• ram''=' c' \, � �+��� 1.+''� •'• .c •� � '� -'>�• TN �� Lt1 • . , VV 11 f .a . , _ (; f •i" ice''` 9 y I v ../•�• it 1`Q /I J' 1l• ,t� 1�� � ,r� �,,�� ��. LLJ LU 04 LLI LU w c~nZrn Q Wk ' tir ,. • y = 0 U Y Z Z Q Q U W Legend ,/ Portion of TM 85D-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment•- , �a..rr..i.�. r•iJ .. �:ji I r ~ w Q O W o i n p ofp p o a Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No. 160002930 4 1 Feet LIJ O O w .�•,- , � '•' a. � coo c Parcel Boundary �. - � ,�. ,fit• O o - r >•i 4 i �+ 400 0 400 w UJ /. J Stephens City Town Limits . �� + '----J P Y ! � � Q --- — I a t � Virdinii �;c(x177p,i� m ti• e,Wo k IU` _ — --- � � Map Data Source. Frederick County, Va. GIS Department, 2016 Data, 2015 Aerial Photos Courtesy of VGIN/VITA (http./Igismaps.vita.virginia.gov/arcgis/rest/services [VBMP20151) 0 i Southem Frederick Area Plan 4 Urban Development Area C) Sewer & Water Service Area Parse s Long Range Land Use Plan Res dential • i\ —) High Density Res.dential Neignbod,000d Yfage Urban Cente, Mob'e Home Bus mess Highway Comrrema Mixed -Use Moved Use Commercial/Office Moved Use Industna/Offioe ndustnal Wareho se ® Heavy ndustna Extractive M n,n =fr^a' ERR Commerva Roc OCommunfty Center Fire & Rescue Histonc nstlutionat I PUD • �� Park Recreation School FAI RFAX PEKE Feet 500 0 500 h� ,ST ic�� FY � h V Q wAKEF�ELO CT HAYVENHURST-CT------/ DGEFIE GARDEN -GA i wIM7 ACT I L-D-AV E—v J w 0 47 Legend Portion of TM 8513-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No. 160002930 R Parcel Boundary Stephens City Town Limits Frederick County Zoning B2 (Business, General Distrist) RP (Residential, Performance District) RA (Rural Area District) Z �x i z W CV 0 Z Q 2 Q J 2 Z = F- � Lu QZ Z Z_ Z O N W 0 Z O N 0 Z Q O Q U O J r m U Q 0 uJ N aQ � Z 0 LU (n ~ U' w Q w U 2_ _ Z -J > } N J W O w Z o _ Z Q O U Z Z Z Q Y w W Z O U a f- O) LIJ ::) o o 0 O w W X (h o II O W `° U C o N di LIJ o U Map Data Source: Frederick County, Va. GIS Department, 2016 Data PROFFER # 3 INSET • / tiYo'�A . r c 647 W vw;44, N r Guard Rail \ PROFFER # 8 » ` -FAIRF Guard Rail S r ` pj �'ti� r ini G ogr • h c l f io /• �//®� PROFFER # 2Ar `41 11 •/ Q'7A ,... ,,/4 �• PROFFER # 3 �13• � ��•..v ,���� ' �`�,, -�>•�._ ARCAD )MMERI SOUTHERf PROFFER # 4 PHASE ;;PIKE'- -iT—AlIM _HAY.VENHURST CT_ 1 a� ,�. •tom. :,` ,�. 40 •r Legend i .. Parcel Boundary Feet New 100' ROW Liner! New Property Line & 100' ROW Line 500 250 0 500 �'` r� _9��� Vr•� i G grapM I -GI l . r t� SOUTHERN HILLS PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 REZONING AMENDMENT !, TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT REZONING AMENDMENT OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PROFFER DATE: 2016-06-30 1 PROJECT ID: 3126 1 DESIGNED BY DWE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT GREEN WAY SCALE 1 inch = 500 feet !. N G I N F 1-1 K I N( •I 0 •I Map Data Source: Frederick County. Va. GIS Department, 2016 Data; Water and Sewer Data Courtesy of FCSA, January 2016 Map Data Source: Frederick County, Va. GIS Department, 2016 Data. FEMA Flood Map Service Center (http.//msc.fema.gov/portal). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service - National Wetlands Inventory • i a v ST c� JW0215 JW0212 ! p < �i✓(e °e�,sT FRT 1P MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' Stephens Run o��°�y� 500 0 1000 2000FEI S ST T J� 2iyRTi� / yp�e� per° ST O� yqR� p°G �A�tiCy� C ii 0 <FCT ZONEyA `ship � a°AI yG PANEL 0330D COS Q �p9� 0 y m �J� FAIRFAX PIKE FIRM ITTMA T X FAIRPAX GREENST �Q G) FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 1%ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD DISCHARGE v GLENOAK m rt1 841 �9p0w CONTAINED IN CULVERT \O� CT ro CO m �N FREDERICK COUNTY, m VIRGINIA WOODTOP LN AND INCORPORATED AREAS Q- eR�tioy o° PANEL 330 OF 375 tiF RAC EN �� (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) 2 GROV 9qR� CT CONTAINS: ZONE X Qpp ��Q COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX GARDEN O FREDERICK COUN fY 510063 U330 D GAI E DR ��F STEPHENS CITY, TOWN OF 51OD64 0330 D Stephens Run ZONE X 11 F�M�<r eR�tic 0,4iV� yCT THEATER LANE WAKEFIELD CT ✓9 S Notice to User. The Map Number shown below should 'be used when placingmap orders; the Community Number p� shown above should be used on Insurance applications for Oj the subject community o��^Fti MAP NUMBER x o JW0218 � a 51069CO330D HAYVENHURST CT <� T EFFECTIVE DATE y WHICFRLD t9ND SEG SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 JWO 22 ZONE A p �v Federal Emergency Management Agency TOWN RUN LANE AE 92F Sheep Run rycN 0350 '41°0°"E 7421111ImE This is an official copy of a portion of the above referenced flood map, It was extracted using F-MIT On -Line. This map does not reflect changes f OOOm aQ JOINS PANEL E or amendments which may have been made subsequent to the date on the title block For the latest product information about National Flood Insurance 73900O.E Program flood maps check the FEMA Flood Map Store at www. msc fema gov, Legend Portion of TM 85D-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No. 160002930 Parcel Boundary QStephens City Town Limits NRCS Soils = 3C BL.AIRTON SILT LOAM, 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES 41C WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERY SILT LOAMS, 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES 41 D WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERY SILT LOAMS, 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES - 41E:WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERY SILT LOAMS, 25 TO 65 PERCENT SLOPES - 9B CLEARBROOK CHANNERY SILT LOAM, 2 TO 7 PERCENT SLOPES Cq R�EN'Gq TE (D Feet 1 200 0 200 N LU F— U) Z Q LJ a_ 0 I l /� Z _ Cn LU Q J J Q I J Z Z O cl� Cn w Z O N D Lli O Cn 0 m � o U w CN Q z Z_ � ~ (� Cr Q iZ 0 �_ a JQ Z Q cn w w r J 2 in co _ < J O Z Z O Q U w W Z (Y) O a = O Z W a LL LU w Co O � O N w � o oLLro 0 ui w o � Map Data Source Frederick County. Va. GIS Department, 2016 Data Map Data Source. Frederick County. Va. GIS Department. 2016 Data 0 L..I Evan Wvatt rom: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT) <Rhonda. Fun khouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov> on behalf of Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT)<Matthew.SmithOvdot.virginia.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 11:34 AM To: Evan Wyatt Cc: 'John Bishop'; Mark Cheran; Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT); Ingram, Uoyd (VDOT) Subject: Southern Hills Phase 2 - VDOT comments to Rezoning We have completed our review of the Southern Hills Phase 2 rezoning application dated June 30, 2016. Our comments are as follows: 1. VDOT recommends that the "Preliminary Matters" section of the proffer statement be updated to reference the existing proffers associated with rezonings #01-01 and #22-06 as they relate to Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138 (the undeveloped 62 commercial parcel north of the site). Proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 relate to the right- of-way dedication, construction phasing and access to future Warrior Drive by the owner / developer of Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138. 2. Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 will be connected to a property covered by an new set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VDOT recommends that proposed proffer A.2 be updated to make the dedication of the 100-foot wide future Warrior Drive right-of-way, as opposed to the reservation, a condition of site plan approval for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 residential development. 3. The 100' wide reservation for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A-141. 'cif you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. ( Area Land Use Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & VJarren Counties 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22821 voice: 540/981-5615 fax: 540/981-5607 e-mail: Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginla.gov 9 ,Frederick County Public Schools O�... to ensure all students an excellent education • K. Wayne Lee, Jr. LEED AP . Coordinator of Planning and Development . leew@frederick.k12.va.us July 22, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Re: Southern Hills Phase Ili Rezoning Application Dear Evan: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Southern Hills phase II rezoning application submitted to us on June 30, 2016. We offer the following comment: 1. We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to maintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120, even though the development's proposed impact on community facilities has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single-family detached units. Similar to your estimate, we estimate that this development will house 51 students: 14 high school students, 12 middle school students, and 25 elementary school students. In order to properly serve these additional students, Frederick County Public Schools would spend an estimated $591,000 more per year in operating costs (or $4,546 average per unit per year) and an estimated $2,104,000 in one-time capital expenditures (or $16,185 average per unit). You will find, enclosed with this letter, a more detailed assessment of the estimated impact of Hiatt Run on FCPS, including attendance zone information. Please feel free to contact me at leew(rr)frederick.k 12.va.us or 540-662-3888 x88249 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, 0.iv-k K. Wayne Lee, Jr., LEED AP Coordinator of Planning and Development enclosure cc: Dr. David Sovine, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Albert Orndorff, Assistant Superintendent for Administration Mr. John Grubbs, Transportation Director 1415 Amherst Street wwwJrederIck.kl2.va.us 540-662.3889 Ext. 88249 P.O. Box 3508 540-6624237 fax Winchester, Virginia 22604.2646 Annual Operational Costs FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Total Student Annual Budget) Generation Impact Development's Impact on FCPS Operational Costs $11,584 51 $591,000 age Annual Operational Cost Per Unit ed Sd6 School Facilitv Information Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) 2016-17 School Attendance Zone* Bass -Hoover R.E. Aylor Sherando June 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 1,518 2016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 1,400 * - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. # - Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. • 9 0 0 0 '! Frederick CAFY Public Schools Development Assessment Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Multifamily Mobile Home/Other Totals Southern Hills Phase H July 22, 2016 Student Generation Housing Units# 130 0 0 0 130 School Cost Program Capacity Per Student Cost Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Elementary School Student Generation 25 0 0 0 25 Capital Costs Elementary School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $24,700,000 850 $29,059 25 $726,000 Middle School Student Generation 12 0 0 0 12 Middle School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $49,500,000 940 $52,660 12 $632,000 High School Student Generation 14 0 0 0 14 High School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $91,900,000 1,725 $53,275 14 $746,000 Total Student Generation 51 0 0 0 Total Capital Costs $2,104,000 0 0 uPFCA) tY SAN1tgt�O ,1G e W G � a W Q -1 LL S G 0 • FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY Post Offfec Box 1877 PH (540) 868-1061 Eric R. Lawrence Winchester Virginia 22604-8377 Fax (540) 868-1429 Executive Director www.fcsa-watcr.com July 14, 2016 Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Rezoning Application Comment Southern Hills, Phase 2 Tax Map Number: SSD-1-1-95 Is 40.36 acres Dear Mr. Wyatt: Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments on the Southern Hills, Phase 2 rezoning application package, received at FCSA June 30, 2016. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) offers comments limited to the anticipated impact/effect upon the Authority's public water and sanitary sewer system and the demands thereon. The project parcels are in the sewer and water service area (SWSA) and are served by FCSA. Based on the project's location both water and sanitary sewer services are available within a reasonable distance from the site. Sanitary sewer treatment capacity at the wastewater treatment plant is also presently available. It appears the rezoning application is a reduction in the number of residential units that would be permitted on the site, when compared to the existing proffers for the site- this results in reduced demands for FCSA services. The rezoning application also appears to not increase the commercial development opportunities. It is also acknowledged that Phase I of the development is already connected to FCSA for water and sewer services by a pump station sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows from Southern Hills, Phase 2. It is projected that impacts to FCSA will not increase, and may actually decrease as a result in fewer residential units being constructed. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. WATER'S WORTH IT Page 2 RE: Southern Hills, Phase 2 rezoning application Mr. Evan Wyatt July 14, 2016 Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments. Sincerel Eric R. Lawrence, AlCP Executive Director Cc: Candice Perkins, County Planning Department • • 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: rwil lia@co.frederick.va.us August 4, 2016 VIA E-MAIL AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester VA 22602 Re: Rezoning Application — Southern Hills — Phase 2 — Rezoning Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 Dear Evan: You have submitted to Frederick County for review the above -referenced proffer statement (the "Proffer Statement') for the proposed rezoning of Tax Parcel Number 85D-1-1-95 (the "Property"), 40.36f acres, more or less, in the Opequon Magisterial District, from the RP Residential Performance District and the B2 General Business District, both with proffers, to the RP Residential Performance District and the B2 General Business District, both with revised proffers. I have now reviewed the Proffer Statement and it is my opinion that the Proffer Statement would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following comments: • Heading — Consistent with the other references in the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the description of the "REZONING" should also reference the B2 portion of the Property. • Proffer A2 — The Proffer might best specifically reference the terms of the commitment in the dedication recorded as Instrument Number 160002930, namely that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made prior to March 10, 2105. Also, so as not to cause any confusion regarding enforceability of previous proffer commitments, this proffer might best make some reference to Proffer 10 of the 2007 Proffers. Proffer 10 of the 2007 Proffers provides that no greater than 10% of the 676,885 maximum allowable square footage in the B2 zone on parcel number 85-A-138 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 Mr. Evan Wyatt August 4, 2016 Page 2 shall be constructed before Warrior Drive is constructed across the Property. Perhaps a sentence might be added to Proffer A2 along the lines of: The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. Proffer D 1 — New state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation that Proffer D1 satisfies that requirement. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific development, as my understanding is that review will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. ZB Williams County Attorney cc: Candice Perkins, Assistant Director of Planning & Development (via e-mail) 0 • FNDj'9P 151 Windy Hill Lane 4VEEivWAY Winchester, VA 22602 NGINEERING September 15, 2016 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: Candice Perkins, Deputy Director 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Southern Hills - Phase 2 Rezoning — Review Agencies Comment Response Letter Dear Candice: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a comprehensive comment response letter that addresses the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning comments received from the various review agencies. The comprehensive comment response letter is structured to provide for the specific review agency, the date the comment was received, and information pertaining to each review comment. This information is intended to explain how specific comments have been addressed by the rezoning application or advise why the specific comment was not included in the proffered development program for the commercial redevelopment project. Frederick County Fire Marshal — Comment dated July S, 2016 ❖ Rezoning Approved. Frederick County Sanitation Authority — Comment dated July 14, 2016 ❖ The rezoning application results in reduced demands for FCSA services. It is acknowledged that the existing pump station is sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows from Southern Hills Phase 2. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Frederick County Public Schools — Comment dated July 22, 2016 We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to maintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120.00 even though the development's proposed impact on community facilities has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single- family detached units and FCPS estimates that this development will house 51 students (14 Engineers Surveyors Planners Environmental Scientists Laboratory Telephone 540-662-4185 Fax 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com Project #3126V/EAW high school, 12 middle school and 25 elementary school). FCPS estimates $2,104,000.00 in one-time capital expenditures ($16,185.00 average per unit). A detailed assessment of the estimated impact, including attendance zone information is enclosed. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Public Schools Attributable Impacts. Frederick County Transportation — Comment dated July 22, 2016 ❖ The Traffic Impact Analysis should be fine to waive based on the impacts that are being presented. Frederick County Parks & Recreation — Comment dated July 26, 2016 ❖ It appears that the proposed monetary contribution will not meet current Development Impact Model (DIM) levels. Parks and Recreation would like to see minimum levels met. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Parks and Recreation Attributable Impacts. VDOT — Comment dated July 26, 2016 ❖ VDOT recommends that the Preliminary Matters section of the proffer statement be updated to reference the existing proffers associated with rezonings #01-01 and #22-06 as they relate to the undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of the site. COMMENT RESPONSE: The undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of the site is not a parcel that is part of the rezoning application as it is owned by another entity. Greenway Engineering will work with the County Attorney to determine the appropriate revisions (if any) to the proffer statement regarding this matter. ❖ Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 will be connected to a property covered by a new set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VDOT recommends that proposed proffer A2 be updated to make the dedication of the 100 foot wide future Warrior Drive right-of-way, as opposed to the reservation, a condition of site plan approval for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 • residential development. Project #3126V/EAW 0 • COMMENT RESPONSE: A small portion of the 132 commercial area associated with RZ#22- 06 is a component of this project, which was acquired by the Property Owner to ensure that this acreage would be available as a right-of-way reservation for future dedication to Frederick County and/or VDOT should it be needed in the future. The Owner has ensured that this reservation will be available through year 2105 as demonstrated in Instrument No. 160002930, which is included as information with the rezoning application. Therefore, this instrument provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through March 10, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. The 100' wide reservation for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A- 141. COMMENT RESPONSE: The Owner has prepared a plat and deed that reserves the 100' right-of-way across the portion of Southern Hills — Phase 1. This document, recorded as Instrument No. 160008765 is consistent with information in Instrument No. 160002930 and provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through August 11, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. Frederick County Planning — Comment dated August 3, 2016 • •'• The Southern Frederick Area Plan identifies residential density at four units per acre for this • site. The proposed density is 3.22 units per acre, which is relatively consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. ❖ Based on changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the monetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation from FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance zones where this development is located. As well as data from Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriff's Office on their respective service availabilities. COMMENT RESPONSE: The FCPS review comment dated July 22, 2016 includes a School Facility Information Table that identifies the current school attendance zones and their capacities that are specific to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. 0 ❖ Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. Project #3126V/BAW 3 9 0 COMMENT RESPONSE: A copy of the 2006 Proffer Statement with redline comments has been provided to identify proffer items carried forward, proffer items that have been modified, and proffer items that have been eliminated in conjunction with the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement. ❖ The introduction to the proffer does not reference the B2 District zoning portion of the property, nor the acreage of the RP District and B2 District portions of the property. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reference both zoning districts and their respective acreages. A Zoning Plat Exhibit dated September 15, 2016 has been prepared that provides the acreage and limits within each zoning district. 441- An updated Generalized Development Plan is recommended for this application. COMMENT RESPONSE: Greenway Engineering met with the Planning Department and reviewed the draft Subdivision Design Plan that will be submitted subsequent to final rezoning approval. It was agreed that an updated Generalized Development Plan would not be necessary due to the simplicity of the single-family residential layout. 0 Frederick County Public Works — Comment dated August 4, 2016 ••• We have no comments concerning the proposed rezoning. Frederick County Attorney — Comment dated August 4, 2016 ❖ Consistent with the other references in the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the description of the "REZONING" should also reference the B2 portion of the property. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. ❖ Section A2 of the Proffer Statement might be best if it specifies that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT provided that such request is made prior to March 10, 2105. Additionally, a sentence advising that the reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001 and revised January 31, 2007 approved as part of RZ #22-06 is recommended to avoid confusion regarding enforcement of previous proffer commitments. Project #3126V/EAW w COMMENT RESPONSE: Section A2 of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. ❖ Section DI — new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation that Proffer DI satisfies that requirement. COMMENT RESPONSE: Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Winchester Regional Airport — Comment dated August 11, 2016 •t- The proposed rezoning should not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport; however, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from aircraft. Please advise me if you have any questions regarding the information in this letter. Greenway Engineering will provide a copy of this letter, a copy of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement and a copy of the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 to all applicable review agencies for information. Sincerely, W �- I ---- Evan Wyatt, Dire for of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. Cc: Arcadia Communities, LLC Project #3126V/EAW 5 • C� • 0 REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA To be completed by Planning Staff v� j Fee Amount Paid $ 1 06 to. Zoning Amendment Number ( t-1 Date Received n I (a PC Hearing Date I J 1 9 1 lv BOS Hearing Date t l g ,J (n The following information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 2. Property Owner (if different than above): Name: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Address: 9900 Main Street Suite 500 Fairfax, VA 22031 3. Contact person if other than above: Name: Evan Wyatt Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Telephone: (703) 425-2614 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 4. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number(s): 85D-1-1-95 b. Total acreage to be rezoned: 40.36 +/- Acres (RP District Proffer Revisions) C. Total acreage of the parcel(s) to be rezoned (if the entirety of the parcel(s) is not being rezoned): 40.36+/- Acres (RP District Proffer Revisions) d. Current zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: RP District 37.79 +/- Acres; B2 District 2.56 +/- Acres (Public Street Reservation Area) e. Proposed zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: RP District 37.79 +/- Acres; B2 District 2.56 +/- Acres (Public Street Reservation Area) f. Magisterial District(s): Opequon District 12 5. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location map _ ✓_ Agency Comments ✓ Plat V _ Fees _ ✓ Deed to property ✓ Impact Analysis Statement ✓'_ Verification of taxes paid _ ✓ Proffer Statement Plat depicting exact meets and bounds for the proposed zoning district ✓ _ Digital copies (pdf's) of all submitted documents, maps and exhibits ✓'_ 6. The Code of Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Deleware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NUMBER USE ZONING Please refer to attached Property Adjoiner Map Exhibit and Property Adjoiner PIN, Use, and Zoning Information Table 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers): The 40.36 +/- Acre Portion of Tax Map 85D-1-1-95 proposed for rezoning is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) 13 0 ►�J 0 • 9. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Number of Units Proposed Single Family homes: 130 Townhome: Multi -Family: Non -Residential Lots: Mobile Home: Hotel Rooms: Square Footage of Proposed Uses Office: Service Station: Retail: Manufacturing: Restaurant: Warehouse: Commercial: Other: 10. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. J- Applicant(s): �UC (� . w� 'CDate: Date: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., Its Sole Member and Manager Owner(s): By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc, Its Manager C,w(')Y rr - 1 ✓ &LV1 t� �I{�—j(sLx 0 14 Date: 0 q A (o Date: SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 Tax Map Number Owner JiMailing Address City & State IZIP Code jAcres 85 A 59 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 1000 LOWES BLVD IMOORESVlLLE, NC 28117 89.86 85 A 138 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN Si, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 11.86 85D 11 89 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 220311 0.29 85D I 1 90 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 220311 0.28 8SD 11 91 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN S', STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 220311 0.28 85D 11 92 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 220311 0.28 85D 11 93 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 220311 0.28 85D 11 94 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN Si, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031L 0.28 85D 11 95 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 40.36 85D 11 95A SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 1753 85D 11 958 SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 ISAN JOSE, CA 1 951501 0.34 ADJOINING PROPERTIES LISTING E SOURCE: FREDERICK COUNTY GIS, 2016 DATA SORTED BY TAX MAP NUMBER • • cx Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www1eva.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. (Phone) (703) 425-2614 (Address) 9900 Main Street Suke 600 Fairfax, VA 22031 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 160002930 on Page 0001 , and is described as Parcel:85D Lot:95 Block: 1 Section:I Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway Engineering, Inc. (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) 161 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: X Rezoning (including proffers) Conditional Use Permit X Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) Subdivision Site Plan Variance or Appeal My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this day of —I �q(,L' :;Pes= Kl1 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C, By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., Its Sole Member and Manager Signature(S) B : VM Holdin s III, L.L.C. Its Mana in Member By: Van Metr Financia s sates, Inc, is anager / ;, , 09""L VE 0rtand I, Paoiw a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction X certify that the person who sign8d to the foregoing instrument It appeared before me Niz acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this �— day of 20kl�o. My Commission Expires: 0 ta P)iib c State of Virginia, City/County of k-cay Vy. , To -wit: Frederick County SmartScale (H1132) Applications 1. Route 37 extension from Tasker Road to Route 522 VDOT Cost Estimate: $102,187,414 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2029 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Construction of Four Lane limited access Roadway on new alignment;Froj the terminus of the current VDOT interchange improvement at 1-81 exit 310 to Rte. 522, with a full diamond interchange at Warrior Drive, and 1/2 diamond interchange at Rte. 522. The eastern loop of Route 37 has been a fixture in Frederick County planning and priorities for well over 20 years. The first priority segment of that roadway is the segment from 1-81 Exit 310 to Route 522. This connection, located equidistant between the congested exits 307 and 313 offers a vital network connection that will not only greatly aid conditions at Exit 310 and 307 but provide additional and more efficient access to the Virginia Inland Port which is vital on a statewide scale. As one of many communities that are bisected by 1-81, Frederick County's lack of efficient east west movement has become a greater issue as growth pressures have occurred over the years. This additional network connection would significantly improve that situation. Inland port growth has continued even through much of the recession and with the waning of that recession is now regaining past form. This project offers very important additional and more efficient access for trips to and from the port at a time when Exit 313 is under study due to its deteriorating condition and congestion issues and Exit 307 as well as Route 277 between Exit 307 and 522 suffers from significant congestion issues. Finally, this roadway will offer direct access to a development currently proffered to bring nearly 1,000,000 square feet of commercial and office development within the Frederick County designated Urban Development Area. The interchange with Warrior Drive will allow the closure of the Tasker Road interchange which will promote better spacing and safer operation of VDOT's current ongoing improvements to Exit 310 as well as a much improved access point for future commercial as well as thousands of residential trips that are currently funneled through inadequate facilities. 2. (variation of Project 1) Route 37 extension from Tasker Road to Future Warrior Drive location combined with construction of Warrior Drive from that location to current terminus of Warrior Drive VDOT Cost Estimate: $49,510,785 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2029 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Extend Route 37 as a 4 lane limited access facility from its intersection with Tasker Road to the future location of Warrior Drive. Extend Warrior Drive from its current terminus to Route 37. This project will provide a much needed alternative route for traffic that currently travels to and from the exit 310 interchange via Tasker Road. In addition, this project will aid in congestion at exit 307 and allow for the closure of the temporary ramps at Tasker Road. 3. Exit 317 NB exit ramp relocation to location where Redbud Road currently ties into Route 11 North combined with the rerouting of Redbud Road to Snowden Bridge Blvd. VDOT Cost Estimate: $11,239,131 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2021 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: This project consists to two main components. The first component would be the relocation of the 1-81 NB exit ramp at Exit 317 from its current intersection with Route 11 to the location where Redbud Road currently intersects with Route 11. This would also involve removing the traffic signal at the current intersection. The second component of the project would reroute Redbud Road to an intersection with Snowden Bridge Blvd. 4. Route 277 from Double Church Road to Warrior Drive, widening and access management VDOT Cost Estimate: $25,428,540 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2028 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Phase II of Route 277 improvements. Widening and access management from Double Church Road to Warrior Drive. 5. Route 11 North, widening from Snowden Bridge Blvd to Old Charlestown Road VDOT Cost Estimate: $28,346,142 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2027 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Route 11 North of Snowden Bridge Blvd is currently primarily a two lane roadway. This project would widen that facility to a 6 lane divided roadway with turn lanes where appropriate. 6. Sulphur Springs Road, reconstruction and widening from Route 50 to the landfill VDOT Cost Estimate: $2,704,784 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2020 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Widen Sulphur Spring Road from the intersection with Route 50 to the regional landfill, add paved shoulders for pedestrians and bicycles, improve the intersection at Route 50. This application represents gap funding to complete the project which as been in the secondary program for a number of years. 7. Intersection of Senseny Road and Crestleigh Drive, turn lanes on Senseny VDOT Cost Estimate: $2,548,582 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2027 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Improvements to the intersection of Senseny Road (657) and Crestleigh Drive to include turn lanes and potential signalization. This project would add left and right turn lanes to Senseny Road at the intersection of Crestleigh and potentially a full signalization of the intersection. 8. Intersection of Route 277 and Warrior Drive, extend the eastbound right turn lane on Route 277 and pedestrian safety improvements along the southern part of Warrior Drive VDOT Cost Estimate: $476,644 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2024 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Extend right turn lane for eastbound 277 at the intersection of Rt 277 and Warrior Drive. Installation of sidewalk for pedestrian safety and installation of pedestrian pedestal. 9. Intersection of Papermill Road and Route 522, extend right turn land on eastbound papermill road VDOT Cost Estimate: $507,262 VDOT Completion Estimate: 2025 Fund Source: District Grant and Statewide High Priority Grant Project Description: Extend right turn bay of Papermill Road (Route 644) where it intersects with Route 522 to alleviate turn bay spillover that is taking place. Length to be determined in conjunction with VDOT staff. 9 0 .it RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FREDERIC.K COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR FREDERICK COUNTY HOUSE BILL 2 APPLICATIONS Action: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: October 28, 2015 �J APPROVED ❑ DENIED WHEREAS, this resolution supports the following Frederick Coiuity I Iouse Bill 2 Applications for (lie following projects: Route 37 Extension from Exit 310 to Route 522 Route 277 Widening and Access Management Fox Drive at Route 522 Turn Lane Improvement Route 11 North Improvements Between Exit 317 and Rt. 37 Route 1 I South At Apple Valley Road Turn Lanes WHEREAS, the Virginia Department of "1"ransportation. (hereafter referred to as the DEPARTMENT) has adopted procedures for evaluating and scoring projects consistent with House Bill 2 .requirements; and WHEREAS, the DEPAR'I'MEN'I' has requested applications to be submitted by localities to be considered for inclusion in the DEPARTMEN'T'S Six -Year Improvement Program. for Fiscal Years 2017 through 2022; and WHEREAS, projects will be evaluated for inclusion in the Six -Year Improvement Program through screening and scoring process to be undertaken by the DEPARI'MENT; and WHEREAS, each of' the projects for which the County Frederick is applying play important roles in (lie County's long-range transportation plans and near teen traffic safety concerns; and WHEREAS, the County of Frederick is an eligible entity to apply for transportation funding under House Bill 2; PDRes #42-15 0 -2- NOW, 'THEREFORE, 13E IT RESOLVED THAT the Frederick County Board Of Supervisors is supportive of each of these applications for inclusion into the Six -Year Improvement Program fiscal years 201.7 through 2022. ADOPTED, this 28th clay of October 2015. This resolution was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Gary A. Lofton Aye_ Robert A. FIess Aye _ Robert W. Fells Aye Gene L. Fisher Aye Charles S. DcHaven, Jr. Aye Jason Ia. Ransom Aye A COPY ATTEST *rendaG. Garton Frederick County Administrator PDRes 1142-15 BOS Res. #021--15 0 0 REZONING APPLICATION 911-16 SOUTHERN HILLS PHASE 2 Staff Report fo►• the Planning Commission I'repared: October 7, 2016 Staff'Contact: Candice G. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 10/19/16 Pending Board of Supervisors: 1 1/09/16 Pending PROPOSAL: To revise the proffers from Rezoning Application 1122-06 for 40.36 acres (37.79 acres of Residential Performance and 2.57 acres Of General BL1S1i1CSS Zoning) to allow IOr the COnStrl1Cti011 Of Lip to 130 single-family detached units. Rezoning 922-06 allowed for the construction OI'Llp to 232 single- family attached units; therefore this i-egLlCStCd rCZ011illg WOLIId change the housing type and decrease the total units by 102. LOCATION: "The site is located on the east side of "Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 Miles SOLIth Of the illtCi'SCC1i011 With Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 10/19/16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is an application to rezone a total of 40.36 acres of land to revise the proffers associated with Rezoning #22-06. This property contains 37.79 acres of -RP (Residential Performance) zoned land and 2.57 acres of I32 (General Business) zoned land. This request seeks to amend the proffers to modify the 11OLISlllg type front single-family attached (townhouse) UnItS to SillglC family detached units as well as decrease the number Of 11111tS fi-om 232 to 130 UllitS; decreasing the total units by 102. This property is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and is located within the limits of the Southern Frederick Area Plan of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this property With residential and commercial land Use designations. The current RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business) zoning designations are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Since this rezoning Was SL1bmittcd after.luly 1, 2016— the specifically attributable proffer policy (§ 15.2- 2303.4) applies to this property; therClorc the Applicant is rcgUired to demonstrate limm their- proffers are specifically attributable to the impacts generated by their devclopmcnt. The ApplicaIt has provided an analysis titled "SOUt11C1'11 Trills Phase 2 Rezoning- Residential Development Attributable Impacts". Staff has Outlined a number of'concerns regarding the proffers proposed by the Applicant. Specifically, the total impacts resulting from the proposed development as outlined by the Applicant's report conic to $834,940.70 however, the Applicant is proffering $1,139, l 20. This figure is $304,179.30 more than the projected impacts ol'the development. The report also shows impacts to Clearbrook Park. Based on the requirements of Virginia Code § 15.2-2303.4 it appears that the proffer amount Shown for impacts on Clearbrook Park ($4,160) and the excess amount of $304,179.30 are unacceptable and violate State Code. A recommendation {'e.gllydillg this i-ezoning application to the Board of Supervisors ivould be app/'opHate %Ile Applica/it vhol[ld be p/'epai-ed to adequately address all Concenis raised bl, the Planning Commission. Rezoning # 1 1-16 Southern I -lilts Phase 2 October 7, 2016 Page 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick Coliilty Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Comnlis.vion and the Board of Supervisors to asvlst theiil in making a decision oil this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are rioted by stuff Where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 10/19/16 Pending Board of Supervisors: 1 1/09/16 Pending PROPOSAL: To revise the proffers from Rezoning Application 922-06 for 40.36 acres (37.79 acres of Residential Performance and 2.57 acres of Gencral Business zoning) to allow for the construction of up to 130 single-family detached units. Rezoning 1122-06 allowed for the construction of up to 232 single- family attached L1111tS; therefore this requested rezoning would change the housing type and decrease the total units by 102. LOCATION: The site is located on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairlax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opcquon PROPERTY Ill NUMI3EIZ: 85D-1-1-95 PROPERTY ZONING: RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business) Districts PRESENT USE: Resi(Icntlal/Commercial — Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) 132 (General Business) South: RP (Residential Performance) Last: RA (Rural Areas) RP (Rcslciclltlal Performance) West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential / Utility Vacant Use: Residential — Southern Hills Phase I Use: Agricultural Southern Hills Open Space Use: Vacant / Agricultural 0 0 Rezoning 41 1-16 Southern Hills Phase 2 October 7, 2016 Page 3 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: Pleasesee e'nmil,i'om kfallhew Smith, P.E. datedJuly 26, 2016. Frederick County Fire Marshall: Plan approved. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Please .Seele'lte)'Ii'o))i Ei'ic R. Lcau,r'eiice, AICP, E\eciitil'e Direclor, clatecl .hily 14, 2016. Frederick County Public Schools: Please see le'llerfi-om K. Wayne Lee, Jr., LEEDAP, clatecl July 22, 2016. lPlaiiniirg staff note: Since the S'iil)ilr%SS'10ir oftJe Schools comment, the Board of SUImi'Vrsom has sii yenned use of the DIM, in light of the General Assembly's enactment of § 15.2- 2303.4, which is discussed at fui'thei' length in this reI)oi't.I Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation: It appears the proposed monetary contribution Will not meet current Development Impact Model (DIM) levels. Parks and Recreation WOUld like t0 See nllllin11.1111 levels islet. /Planning staff note: Since the submission of the Parks & Reci'e'ation comment, the I3oai'Cl of Sul)ei'Wsom has suspended use of the DIM, in light of the General Assembly's enactment of § 15.2-2303.4, which is discussed at f ti•thei• length in this report.] Frederick County Department of Public Works: We ]lave no comments concerning the proposed rezoning. FCedei-ick County Attorney: Please see lellerfi'om Roderick B. Williams, COunly Alloi-ney daled August 4, 2016. Winchester Regional Airport: "1'hc l)i'OpOSCCI 1'CZOilillg has bccil reviewed alld It appcal's that It s110llICI not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside of the airport's Close In Part 77 SUrlace. I-lowevcr, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly-ovcr noise troll] aircraft. Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History On July 11, 2001, the Board Ol SUI)CI'V1Sors approved Rezoning Application #01-01 t0 rezone 105 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) t0 enable the C011StRICtlOn Of 250 single-family residential lots (the Subject property was part Of that Original rezoning). On February 28, 2007 the Board Of Supervisors approved Rezoning Application #22-06 wliich revised the proffers to allow for 88 Single-family detached and 232 single-family attached residential units and 15.5 acres of Q2 (General I3usinesS) zoned land. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County. i 0 Rezoning #11-16 Southern I -lilts Phase 2 October 7, 2016 Page 4 The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is all Official public document that serves as the Community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key CoMpO11C11tS Of C0111I11Llllity lifC. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within FrederiCk COu11ty. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. The Area Plans, Appendix I OI the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, are the primary implelllentatioll tool and will be instrumental to the future planning efforts Of the COL111ty. Land Use. The South Frederick Arca Plan Of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property with residential and commercial land use designations. The current RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business) zoning designations are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Ti•ansL)orlalion and Site Access The site is accessed via Town Run Lane. The 2001 and 2006 rezoning for the Southern Hills development called for a number of transportation improvements which have since been completed: • Stickley Drive Extension to connect with Town Run Lane • Guardrails along "Town Run Lane • Surface material overlay of Town Run Lanc • Traflic slgnalization at Fairfax Pike/Stickley Drive The Southern Frederick Area Plan depicts a new minor arterial road which 1S located within the commercial portion of the site. The right Of way for the new arterial (tile SOLlthern Warrior Drive Extension) continues to be reserved with this rezoning. 3) Proffer Statement — Dated .lone 30, 2016, revised September 15, 2016: A. Land Use Restrictions: I) The RP portion of the property is restricted to a maximum Of 130 single- family detached units. 2) The B2 portion of the property shall contain a 100 foot reservation for future right-of-way, and will be dedicated upon request by the County Or VDOT. (This reservatioIl has been recorded and is available for a time period of' 89 years from the date of recordation — March 10, 2015). B. Ewing Family Cemetery I ) "file owner proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the property. C. Disclosure Statement 1) The final Subdivision plats and Covenants shall state that agricultural land Uses exists to the SOLItil and east of the property and that the ENving family Cemetery exists as a Separate lot with access, and that a wastewater treatment facility exists/previously existed to the north Of the Rezoning#1 1-16 Southern I -lilts Phasc 2 October 7, 2016 Page 5 property. D. Monetary Contribution I) The Owner has proffered a total of $1,139,120 to offset the residential development impacts. This amount reflects the IIlonetary coIltribution that was approved with the 2006 rezoning for the 232 townhouse units. 4) Staff Concerns — Moneta►y Proffers Senate Bill 549 became effective on July 1, 2016 and was codified as Virginia Code 515.2- 2303.4. This proffer policy requires that proffers for resideItial developmeI1ts submitted alter July 1, 2016 must be specifically attributable to the development. This policy applies to schools, transportation, parks and recreation and public safety. The Southern Hills development submitted in 2001 proffered to provide $4,910 per single- family detached unit, with a nlaXiil1u111 of 250 residential units. The project was revised in 2006 to allow for up to 88 single-family detached writs (Phase I) and 232 townhouse units (Phase 11). The 2006 rezoning retained the same monetary Contribution of $4,910 (total of $1,139,120 for the townhouse units). With this new rezoning, the Applicant is proposiIlg to eliminate the townhouse units and allow for the construction of 130 single-family units while still keeping the monetary proffer amount oI $I,I39,120 ($8,762.46 per unit). Since this rezoning was submitted after July 1, 2016 — the specifically attributable proffer policy applies to this property; therefore the Applicant is required to demonstrate how their proffers are specifically attributable to the impacts generated by their- development. The Applicant has provided an analysis titled "Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts". Staff has reviewed this document and has concerns regarding how the monetary figures provided by the Applicant are specifically attributable to the Southern Hills development. • Public Safety — The Applicant has utilized operating costs per average single-family household size multiplied by the total number of proposed dwellings over a ten year period. This amount per the Applicant's analysis comes to $45,636 for the Sheriff's Office and $31,513 for the Volunteer Fire and Rescue Services. • Stcr.1 mulcl mote that it is not typical to utilize operating costs in calculating prqfer amounts — capilal facilities have typically been utilized in the past, but Stuff imuld also Bole that County Fire and Rescue ims omitted ftom the anal)'sls. • Public Schools — Students front this development would attend Bass -Hoover Elementary, Aylor Middle School and Sherando High School. The Applicant's analysis shows existing capacity within the elementary and Middle schools, however the high School is Currently over capacity. Therefore, the Applicant has assumed that with the total high school proposed cost, divided by the total capacity — the total per student cost Of this School would be $53,275. The analysis assumes that 14 high school students Rezoning #1 1-16 Southern I -lilts Phase 2 October 7, 2016 Page 6 Would Collie fi-orn the development — I'CSLllting iIl a total Of $745,850 (founded LIP to $746,000). Parks and Recreation — The Applicant has taken operating costs Of Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park multiplied by the percentage of local revenues to field each park (36% for Clearbrook and 64% for Sherando). This figure was then divided by the total population of Frederick COunty and 111L11tiplicd by the average siIlgle-failllly size and then by the total proposed units in the development and then multiplied by a ten year proposed build Out. The total resulting in $7,631 for Sherando Park and $4,160 for Clcarbook Park. Tile total Parks and Recreation proffer is $11,791. Stuff has concerns regarcling the use of Clearbrook Park as a specifically attributable clue to the distunce,fi-om the cleveloprnent and the availability of amenities at Sherunclo Park. An amount of'S4,160 has been identified relative to Clearbrook Park and, it appears, should not be part of the proffer. The total Impacts Iesulting f mill the proposed development as outlined in the Applicant's report come to $834,940.70, however the Applicant is proffering $1,139,120. This figure is $304,179.30 more than the projected impacts of the development. Based on the requirements of Virginia Code § 15.2-2303.4 it appears that the proffer amount Shown for impacts on Clearbrook Park ($4,160) and the excess amount 017$304,179.30 are unacceptable and violates State Code. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 10/19/15/16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is an application to rezone a total of 40.36 acres of land to revise the proffers associated with Rezoning 1122-06. This property contains 37.79 acres of RP (Residential Performance) zoned land and 2.57 acres of B2 (General Business) zoned land. This request seeks to amend the proffers to modify the housiIlg type from Single family attached (tOWIIIIOLISC) Units to siIlgle-failllly detached Units as well as decrease the number Of units from 232 to 130 units; decreasing the total units by 102. This property is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and is located within the linlitS Of the Southern Frederick Area Plan Of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. `file Comprehensive Plan identifies this pIoperty With residential and commercial land use designations. The curl•Cnt RP (Residential Performance) and B2 (General Business) zoning designations are supported by the Comprehensive Plan. Since this rezoning was submitted after July 1, 2016 — the specifically attributable proffer policy (S 15.2- 2303.4) applies to this property; therefore the Applicant is required to demonstrate how their proffers are specifically attributable to the impacts generated by their development. The Applicant has provided an analysis titled "SOLIt11CI'11 Hills Phase 2 Rezoning- Residential Development Attributable Impacts". Staff has outlined a number of conccrns regarding the proffers proposed by the Applicant. Specifically, the total impacts resulting from the proposed development as outlined by the Applicant's report collie to $834,940.70 however, the Applicant is proffering $1,139,120. This figure is $304,179.30 more than the projected impacts of the development. The report also shows impacts to Clearbrook Park. Based on the Rezoning 81 1-16 Southern I-IiIIs Phase 2 October 7, 2016 Pagc 7 rcgL111'C111CI1tS of Virginia COCK § 1 5.2-2303.4 It appears that the 111'OTTCI' aMOL111t ShOW11 Fol' n11paCtS 011 Clearbrook Park ($4,160) and the excess amOL111t of $304,179.30 a1'C Unacccptablc and Violates State Code. A recommendation regarding this rezoning application to the Board of SUperidsoYs would be appropriateThe Applicant Shodld he prepared to adequatelj, address all concerns raised ht, the Planning Commission. M1 (Industrial, Light District) M2 (Industrial, General District) MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) MS (Medical Support District) OM (Office - Manufacturing Park) R4 (Residential Planned Community District) R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) RA (Rural Area District) RP (Residential Performance District) REZ# I -16 Southern Hills Phase 2 PIN: 85D-I-I-95 Revised Proffers Note: Frederick County Dept of Developme�e 107 N Kent 107 Kent St Suite 202 Winchester. VA 2260 540 - 665 - 5651 Map Created: September 27. 2016 Staff: cperkins 0 205 410 820 Feet i1� It I I REZ#11-16 Southern Hills Phase 2 PI N: 85D-1-1-95 Revised Proffers 0 514 _PEACE 1 /LEWY LN 3.9 i OWN RUN IN 4' RUN 1 ^ v N rw ' 1 w 471 • EWINGS L, �R I .AI e � Service Area R Applications Parcels Sewer and Water Building Foot Long Range Land Use Residential �:5; Neighborhood Village (� �. Urban Center ► 2 tV • Mobile Home Community IFF ♦' t� Business01 ♦j Highway Commercial 3. �♦ . Mixed -Use ♦♦•• Mixed Use Commercial/Office Mixed Use Industrial/Office � - indusal ® Warehouse Warehouse 40 Heavy Industrial \ ®� Extractive Mining �♦ �� Commercial Rec • Rural Community Center Fire & Rescue ® Historic ® Institutional • Planned Unit Development Park �7 Recreation School Employment Airport Support Area 0 B2iB3 OResidential 4 u/a ONigh-Densrty Residential. 6 u/a O Nigh -Density Residential. 12-16 ula ORural Area Interstate Buller Landfill Support Area Natural Resources & Recreation QEnvironmental I & Recreational Resources Milli 2�10 m S01 ' FERN &�hiiq_ RUN LN REZ #I1-16 HILLS �♦�♦� jam:♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦:♦j♦♦♦ ♦♦ ♦Aj♦♦�1 ♦♦s♦♦K , _ MEADOWS -1 EDGE Subdivision S11 fWINGS'LN GARDEN GAT{ DIt Nate: REZ # 11 - 16 Frederick County Dept of Southern Hills Phase 2 PDevelopments 107 07 N Kent Kentt St PIN: Suite 202 85D - I - 1 - 95 Winchester, VA 22601 Revised Proffers 540 - 665 - 5651 Map Created: September 27 2016 Staff: cperkins 0 250 500 1.000 Feet Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79f acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36t acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D- I -1-95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills — Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: September 15, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Scq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36f-acre parcel from 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with modified proffers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be File 113126V/LAW 9 0 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument # 160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument # 160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79± acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owncr hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57f acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewing Family Cemetery lot shall be established via an appropriate casement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said easement. File ft3126v/1:A\V C� C� Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1,139,120.00 value reflects the monetary contribution that was approved by Frederick County for the 232 townhouse lots entitled on the Property as part of Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner proffers to include a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single- family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Owner shall cause for the payment of the established monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for each developed single- family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE File 03126V/13A1V 3 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Owner Signature The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owncr. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to otlier requirements set fortli in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manatier I: Date Coni-nonwealth of Virginia, City/County of FAIa rAq, To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lUbday of 20J& by Q. 1614A2n L�,A-a i)-.. Notary Public My Commission Expires s/ Y Pile 10126WEAw VICTORIA A. TRACE Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia #131615 My commission expires Aug. 31, 20 ig4 PROFFER STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com Greenway Engineering 9 • June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres ol' I32, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Periormance District and 2.57± acres of' B2, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36± acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VM13 Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its ManagiIlg Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills — Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: TBP September 15, 2016 Preliminary Matters PUrSUant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of' the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the Undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36±-acre parcel from the 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to the 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres ol' B2, Business General District with modified proi'l'ers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these prollers shall be deemed withdrawn and have no File it3126V/I:AW Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Conununities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal SLICCCSSOI-S, heirs, Or aSSrgr1S. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member- and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virglllla Corporat1011, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument #160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the laird ofArcadia CO111111LIr1ities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Irlstrunlent #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79± acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for full'illillent 01, Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revises( January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06, B.) Ewing rankly Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewirlg Family Cemetery lot Shall be established via an appropriate casement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family Shall have maintenance responsibility for said easement. File tt3126V/IiAW 2 i • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement 1. A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution 1. The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution Of $1,139,120.00 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1,139,120.00 value reflects the monetary contribution that was approved by Frederick County for the 232 townhouse lots entitled on the Property as part of Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner proffers to include a narrative Oil the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contrlbutlOrl for each single- family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contribution 01' $1,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Owner shall Cause for the payment of the established monetary COiltribUti011 for each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate 01' Occupancy Permit for each developed single- family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE File #3126V/IiAw 3 Greenway Engineering OwIler Signature June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigIls and SLICCCSSOCS 111 the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board Of SLIpCI-VISOI-S grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to Other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia C0111111LI111ties, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager By: Commonwealth of' Virginia, City/County 01' To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20_ by My Commission Expires day of Notary Public Date File #3126Vn:Aw 4 Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts 9/15/16 PURPOSE The purpose of this docurilCnt is t0 provide information SpeCiflC to the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Prol'I'er Statement dated June 30, 2016 that demonstrates attributable impacts for the proposed 130 single-family detached residential lots. This c10CLune11t provides Specific sections that identify residential attributable impacts for transportation, public safety, schools and parks and recreation services; as well as the proffered conditions that address these impacts. PROJECT SUMMARY The Southern Hills SLIbdiVIS1011 WaS originally approved by Frederick County in 2001 for 250 single-family dwelling units On 105± acres located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012). The SOLlthern Hills SUbdIVIS1On Was approved with specific development conditions and monetary contributions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #01-01, which included several off -site transportation improvements and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained single family lots within Southern Hills -Phase 1 and modified the remainder of the project area to allow I'or 232 townhouse lots Within Southern Hills —Phase 2 and t0 allow commercial zoning In the I101'tilel'11 portion Of the project identified as SOUthern Hills — Phase 3. The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #22-06, which included the transportation improvements from IZezoning Application #01-01, the provision OI a 100' right-Oi- way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay to accommodate the fUtL11-C CXtel1S1o11 Of SOL1th Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation, and a monetary Contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot, totaling $1,139,120.00. Arcadia COI11111LInities, LLC acquired the Phase 1 Single -Family Section, the Phase 2 Townhouse Section, and approximately 2.6± acres of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay that is proposed to provide the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. Arcadia CO1111111Ii11ties, LLC has Submitted a Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 I'or the portion Of the Phase 2 TOW1111OLISe Land Bay and the 2.6± acre portion of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. This IZezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 Single -Family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of' the 232 TOWI111OLISe lots, provides for the 100' right -of' -way area between the Phase 2 and Phase 3 Commercial Land Bays, and provides a $ 1,139,120.00 monetary contrlbUti011 that is consistent with the monetary contribllti0n value I'or the 232 Townhouse lots approved Luulef Rezoning Application #22-06. Residential Attributable Impacts Document I September 15, 2016 TRANSPORTATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern I-IiiIS Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Stateillent proposes t0 develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots Currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maxinlunl of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed attributable impacts to transportation associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 TownllouseS x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VI3D Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD RedIICeCI Impacts: Proposed I—CZ011111g I'CS1.11tS ill a rcduction of _50.5 VPD The proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 were determiIled to be appropriate t0 mitigate transportation impacts for the Southern I -fills Subdivision. The proffered transportation improvements have been performed ill advance Of residential (level opmenL activities, which include the following: r Completion of the extension of Stickley Drive (IZoute 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (IZoute 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). i Installation of gUardrali along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. i C01111)1Ct1011 Of 11CW SIII'faCC material overlay Of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. i Implementation Of traffic sigilalizatlOn at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (IZoute 1085). Recordation of the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to VDOT and/or Frederick County. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction Of residential lots and Will result in a rcduction of vehicle trips generated from the proffered single- family lots. The Southern Hills Subdivision has performed all proffered transportation improvements deemed to be required to mitigate transportation impacts and has provided VDOT and Frederick County With the ability to obtain the 100' right-of-way area for future public street improvements to connect to the proposed Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. These facts demonstrate that the SOUtl1CI'11 Hills Phase-2 Rezoning Application has addressed attributable impacts specific to the proposed residential development. Residential Attributable Impacts Document 2 September 15, 2016 1 N 0 • PUBLIC SAFETY — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a InaxII11U111 Of' 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for public safety services is determined by the number of persons reClUil-Cd to serve. The following information identifies the average IlUIllber of persons projected IOr townhouse and single fflllllly dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to public safely associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/11OUSC1101d ; = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size`'` = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction 01' 197 persons ''`Persons Per HOUSChOld (PPH) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document— Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.58. ''`'`Average Family Size value determined G-0111 US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — I-IOUSellOIds by Type Table (page 5). The 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan (CII') DOCIImCIA does not identify Capital protects for the Sheriff's Office, nor does the CII' Document identil'y capital projects for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, which is the first due company for the Southern Hills —Phase 2 residential lots. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Frederick CoUrIty SllCrill'S 0111CC alld lOr the VOIUntcer Fire Departments. The Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County, which amounts to approximately 77% for both the Sheriff's Office and the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for both departments. Operating Costs may include equipment costs (but are not exclusively equipment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides conservative Valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $1,207,973.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $930, 139.00 $930,139.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $1 1.18/person $1 1.18 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $35.10/SFD household $35.10 x 130 SFD = $4,563.67 annual impact $4,563.70 x 10 years''` = $4.5,636.70 Residential Attributable Impacts Document 3 September 15, 2016 VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $834,419.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $642,502.00 $642,502.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $7.72/person $7.72 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $24.24/SFD household $24.24 x 130 SFD = $3,151.30 annual impact $3,151.30 x 10 years'`` = $31,513.00 ;10 years is the conservative build -Out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal COI1St1'LICt1011 SCIMILIIe Of 4-5 lots per quarter 1'CSL11tS ill 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -Out. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a I'CCILICt1011 of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The Current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) does not identify proposed prolCCls that are relevant t0 the Sheriff's Office and the SIepIICIIS City VOlunteer Fire and RCSCLie Company, nor does the CIP identify proposed capital projects in Which the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will have attributable impacts towards. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCLIIIICIA provides a basis t0 determine potential local revellUeS t0 11II1d Operating Costs fOr PL1bl1C Safety Services. Operating COSTS may InCILICIC eClUlptllellt costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build -out projection for the 130 single-family lots; as Well as the complete value Of arillUal Operating Costs over the build -out period. PUBLIC SCHOOLS — ATTRIBUTABLE, IMPACT'S The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of' the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the pr0,lect. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Frederick County Public Schools (FCI'S) utilizes the f'011OWing student/household projects for single-family lots and for tOW111101-ise lots as a basis for determining impacts to public schools: Single -Family Lots: Elementary School = 0.19 students per 11OLISellOICI Middle School = 0.09 stLKICIAS per household High School = 0.10 students per household Residential Attributable Impacts Document 4 September 15, 2016 Townhouse Lots: Elementary School = 0. 13 StUdelILS per household Middle School = 0.07 Students per household High School = 0.07 students per household The Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development Will result in a reduction of 6 Elementary School students; 5 Middle School Students; and 3 High School Students based On projections utilized by FCPS. FCPS provided information that states StUden1S from talc SOUtherll Hills —Phase 2 Development will attend Bass-I-Ioover Elementary School, 12obert E. Aylor Middle School, and Sheraildo High School. FCPS projects that there will be 25 Elementary School Students, 12 Middle School Students, and 14 High School StlidCiltS from the 130 single-family lots Within SOLlthern Hills — Phase 2. This information indicates that there is sufficient capacity at Bass -Hoover Elementary School and Robcrt E. Aylor Middle School to accommodate the projected increase in students from the SOLItlICI-11 Hills —Phase 2 Development; however, this information indicates that the capacity at Sherando I-ligh School is already exceeded by 118 Students. FCPS has acquired property for a new high school that will provide for acceptable capacity for Students utilizing the new facility and for Students at Sherando High School once the new facility is open. FCPS has received funding for design services and anticipates opeiling the new high school facility in Fall 2019. CONCLUSION: FCPS has provided capital cost information for the new high school that assumes a pI'1Ce-per-Student illUltipliff for the school capacity, which totals $53,275.00 per student. FCPS projects that the student generation front the SOLIthern Hills —Phase 2 Development Will result in $746,000.00 of capital cost based on the price -per -Student multiplier. The Frederick County 2016- 2017 AnllLial Budget DOCLlnlellt provides budget information for the School Debt Service (page 179), which accounts f'or all school pro 'jectS in the County that have been funded through bond revenues. This information does not provide Sufficient information to determine attributable impacts to specific schools; therefore, the $746,000.00 projection for the price -per -student multiplier for the new high school will be used for this analysis, which should be considered very conservative since students from the Southern I-Iills—Phase 2 Development will not utilize the new high school facility. PARKS & RECREATION — ATTRII3UTAI3LE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffcr Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maxlllll1111 of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for parks and recreation services is determined by the number of persons required to serve. The following information identifies the average Residential Attributable Impacts Document 5 September 15, 2016 number of persons protected for tOwllhOLISC alld Sillgle family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to parks and recreation associated with this rezoIliIlg regLICSt: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/household : = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size-' = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rC•r_Oning results in a reduction of 197 persons Persons Per Household (PPH) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCUrnent — Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.59. ''"'`Average Family Size value determined front US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - Frederick County 2016-2017 (page 195). The Budget Document identifies that the CIP consists of a schedule for 'Major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. Additionally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is strictly advisory and that it is possible particular projects may not be funded CILII'lllg the year that It is indicated in the CIP. Finally, the BLIdget Document states that the CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. The 2015-2016 CIP DOCLIment provides a section entitled Project FLIlldiilg (page 21), which identifies how capital projects are funded for various agencies and divisions. The CIP Document states that funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance Of the County. Additionally, the C113 Document advises that the Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. The Parks and Recreation Department identifies $71,648,000.00 in CIP projects that are to be funded by the COLlnty during the 2015-2020 fiscal years. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County Parks and Recreation during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Fiscal years for Clearbrook Park (page 150) and Sherando Park (page 151). Funding for the two regional parks is achieved primarily from fees charged for use of facilities and from local revenues. Local revenues for Clearbrook Park averaged $143,684.00 during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years, while Sherando Park averaged $267,347.00. The percentage of local revenues to fund Clearbrook Park averaged 36% and Sherando Park averaged 64%, with the remaining f 111dillg Coming from fees charged fOr Use of facilities. The Budget DOCLInlellt provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park. Operating Costs may illclLlde equipment costs (but are not exclusively equipment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local colltrlbllti011S provides valllatioll that Call be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. It is more than likely that Residential Attributable Impacts Document 6 September 15, 2016 residents of the Southern Hills —Phase 2 1)1-0,ject will utilize Sherando Park based on the proximity of the regional park to this project. However, the residential attributable impacts have been considered for both regional parks for the purpose of this analysis, which provides conservative valuation for attributable impacts associated with this project. SHERANDO PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $243,123.00 x .64 (Local Funds) = $155,598.72 $155,598.72/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.87/person $1.87 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $5.87/SFD household $5.87 x 130 SFD = $763.10 annual impact $763.10 x 10 years:': = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $234,843.00 x .36 (Local Funds)'` = $84,543.48 $84,543.48/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.02/person $1.02 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $3.20/SFD household $3.20 x 130 SFD = $416.00 anlll.lal impact $416.00 x 10 years": = $4,160.00 '1`10 years is the conservative build -out 1101•ilOn for the 130 single-family lots. A normal Construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. SHERANDO 13AIZK ATTRI13UTA13LE IMPACT = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PARK ATTIZ113UTA13LE IMPACT = $4,160.00 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION ATTIZIBUTABLE IMPACT = $1 1,791.00 CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction Of residential lots and will result in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The CUl•rellt Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) DOCUment does not identity capital projects that were demonstrated lOr ILllldlllg ClUrillg the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal year budgets. Additionally, the CIP identifies that funding for Parks and Recreation Department capital projects will come from the unreserved I'und balance of the County. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for the Clearbrook Regional Park and the Sherando Regional Park. Operating Costs may 111CILIde egLlll)lllCllt costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Residential Attributable Impacts Document 7 September 15, 2016 • Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% Of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period f*or both Clearbrook Regional Park and Sherando Regional Park. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build - out prOlectlon for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -out period. SOUTHERN HILLS —PHASE 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The information in this dOCUlllent has been developed to determine attributable impacts frolll the SOLlthern HMIs —Phase 2 Development to demonstrate that the $1 ,139,120.00 monetary contrlbUtion identified in Section D. Monetary Contributions of the June 30, 2016 Proffer Statement is appropriate. The Following information is provided from the various sections Of this document: Transportation Impacts: NONE (all proffered transportatloil improvements complete) Public Safety Impacts: $ 77,149.70 Total Public Schools Impacts: $746,000.00 Total Parks & Recreation Impacts: $ 1 1,791.00 Total Total Impacts: Monetary Contribution Attachments $834,940.70 Total $1,139,120.00 Total (+ $304,179.30) Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit 6-30-16 Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts •:• Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvenlents Plan Document Excerpts • Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables US Census Bureau I-IOusehold and Families DOCL1111CIA Residential Attributable Impacts Document 8 September 15, 2016 • Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit PROFFER 0 1 INSET W,4 PROFFER 0 3 PROFFER A 4 PROFFER • 8 lfi-' PROFFER 0 2 %.t FAIRFAX PIKE" �l • y� 1 r • a wf ;cv Legend '►'} Nwr 1p0' ROW liM { •A --Faer' N.. P-ly Lw & 1oa ROW I.. a 500 250 500 c`" �l .r SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS -PHASE 2 REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT REZONING AMENDMENT OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT 1:n� FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PROFFER DATE 2016.0610 PROJECT ID 3126 DLSK;NFDBy DWI, COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT COMPLIANCE SCALE IiW)-500Ie*I ENGINEERING 0 �J Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts Sheriff Volunteer Fire Departments Ambulance & Rescue Service Public Safety Contributions Juvenile Court Probation Inspections Fire and Rescue Public Safety Communications PUBLIC SAFETY Fire and Rescue) 32% Public Safety 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $11,610,858 $11,644,337 $11,644,337 $402,822 3.58% 987,582 895,305 895,305 52,745 6.26% 395,029 395,200 395,200 0 0.00% 5,302,908 5,513,558 5,513,558 45,633 0.83% 149,981 146,835 146,835 5,055 3.57% 1,122,692 1,151,981 1,151,981 61,964 5.68% 8,266,034 9,829,763 9,829,763 1,957,774 24.87% 1,235,238 1,417,841 1,417,841 57,520 4.23% $29,070,322 $30,994,820 $30,994,820 $2,583,513 9.09% Public Safety Communications 5% Sheriff -37% Ambulance & Rescue Service 1% County of Frederick, VA FY 2016 - 2017 SHERIFF 3102 DESCRIPTION: The Frederick County Sheriffs Office is comprised of four divisions: Patrol, Administrative Services, Investigative, and Court Security/Civil Process. The Patrol Division is responsible for answering calls for service, initial investigations of criminal complaints, and patrolling the streets and highways for traffic violations. Additionally, each shift is responsible for business checks, serving warrants, responding to alarms, handling Detention Orders, Protective Orders, and preparing cases and presenting evidence in Court. Tlie Traffic Unit is one of the fastest growing units within the Patrol Division. The number of traffic complaints, accident investigations, and citations issued continues to increase as the community continues to grow. Originally the intent for this unit was to supplement the Virginia State Police in handling the number of complaints dealing with traffic. Since the inception of the traffic unit, this office has become the primary agency for dealing with traffic complaints. The traffic unit also handles special traffic complaints reported to the Sheriffs office and coordinates and establishes special details such as DUI checkpoints and scatbelt safety checkpoints. The Administrative Services Division is responsible for the School Resource Officers and the Animal Control Officers. This division also maintains the Slicrifrs Office accreditation and provides community services such as Neighborhood Watch, Project Watch, and Project Lifesaver. The Sheriffs Office Emergency Response Team is also part of the Administrative Services Division. The Investigation Division handles all major felony cases and the more serious and violent misdemeanor cases, in addition to special Investigations Into drugs, gangs, child pornography, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, white collar crime, computer crimes, and fraud. 'file Court Security/Civil Process division is responsible for providing security for the Frederick County Courts. This division is also responsible for serving all civil papers within Frederick County and handling prisoner extraditions and prisoner transports. GOALS: • Provide the citizens of Frederick County the best services possible by providing community relations through deputies performing a variety of duties, to include Sheriffs Kid Camp, the D.A.R.E. program, Neighborhood Watch meetings, Project Lifesaver, VIN Etching, Elder Assistance Programs, and Child Fingerprinting. • Continue to upgrade law enforcement equipment with more modem equipment such as TASERS, :Less than Lethal Weapons and other alternatives to deadly force while keeping the safety of our personnel and the public as our It priority. • Continue working relationships with outside agencies that request our services. • Continue efforts to recruit and hire quality personnel. • Continue to maintain the Virginia Law Enforcement Accreditation Standards. • Provide School Resource Officers (SRO) for as many schools as possible. • Train and utilize a Bloodhound for search and rescue and fugitive location. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Actual Projected Projected Law Enforcement Calls for Service 71,132 62,722 58,144 it of Warrants Served 7,585 7,640 7,622 # of Criminal Arrests 4,116 3,935 3,879 # of Citations Issued 5,733 4,526 3,797 11 of Cases Reported 5,536 6,593 6,436 #/ of Civil Papers Served 18,694 18,057 17,701 # of Extraditions/9'ransports 398 448 467 BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % Costs: Personnel 9,796,034 10,480,064 10,207,584 11,128,561 648,497 6.19% Operating 1,212,599 1,152,948 981,587 1,207,973 55,025 4.77% Capital/Leases 602,225 11,325 647,835 11,429 104 0.92% TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 12,347,963 703,626 6.04% Revenue: Fees 574,534 447,045 578,347 432,745-14,300 -3.20% Statc/Federal 2,677,122 2,352,154 2,657,125 2,388,421 36,267 1.54% Local 8,359,202 8,845,138 8,601,534 9,526797 681,659 7.71% TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 12,347,963 703,626 6.04% Full-time Positions 126.5 133.5 133.5 1 L___139.5j6 4.49% County of Frederick, VA 110 FY 2016 - 2017 1 VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS 3202 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this expenditure activity is to provide contributions to the eleven volunteer fire companies which serve Frederick County. The contribution is used by the fire company to support their mission of providing fire protection to the residents of their service area. Each volunteer company provides an annual financial statement to the county as evidence of expenses incurred. The governing body of the county recognizes the invaluable contributions made to the community by our volunteer fire companies. GOALS: * Provide fair and accurate contributions to the county fire departments. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget 13ud et Amount % Costs: Personnel 73,676 73,676 66,308 73,676 0 0.00% Operating 913,906 821,629 1,031,745 834,419 12,790 1.56% Capital/Leases 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 908,095 12,790 1.43% TOTAL 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 Revenue: Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% State/Federal 273,993 220,000 214,535 210,000 -10,000 -4.55% Local 713,589 675,305 883,518 698,095 22,790 3.37% TOTAL 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 908,095 12,790 1.43% Full-time Positions 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA FY 2016 - 2017 11 • Parks & Rec. — Admin. Parks Maintenance Recreation Centers Clearbrook Park Sherando Park Regional Library PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL Sheran 7' Clearbrook 6% Parks, Recreation & Cultural 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $607,026 $1,035,835 $707,341 -$328,494 -31.71% 1,570,785 1,042,120 1,062,790 20,670 1.98% 1,562,265 2,107,290 2,707,142 599,852 28.47% 387,821 434,999 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 434,821 409,482 410,398 916 0.22% 862,665 862,665 942,357 79,692 9.24% $5,425,383 $5,892,391 $6 218 950 $326,559 5.54% Reainnal T.ihrary Parks & Rec. - Admin. aintenance 7% County of Frederick, VA 145 FY 2016 - 2017 9 • CLEARBROOK PARK 7109 DESCRIPTION: The Clearbrook Park budget contains all the necessary finds to maintain the 55 acre Clearbrook Park, three Neighborhood parks, two Frederick County Public Schools (FOPS) high schools, two FCPS middle schools, seven FCPS elementary schools, two additional FOPS building grounds, and the Old Frederick County Courthouse lawn. GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees State/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Bud let Budget Budget Amount % 129,562 154,243 156,576 149,429 -4,814 -3.12% 234,958 280,756 231,683 234,843 -45,913 -16.35% 23,301 0 44,739 4,650 4,650 100.00% 387,821 434,999 432,998 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 212,064 336,100 375,708 232,528 -103,572 -30.82% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 175,757 98,899 57,290 156,394 57,495 58.14% 387,821 434,999 432,998 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 150 FY 2016 - 2017 SHERANDO PARK 7110 DESCRIPTION: The Sherando Park budget contains all the necessary funds to maintain the 334 acre Sherando Park and the grounds at one Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) high school, two FCPS middle schools, five FCPS elementary schools, Frederick County Public Safety Building, and Warrior Drive Right -Of -Way. GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted Actual Budget Budget Bud et Costs: Personnel 156,777 160,387 143,376 160,275 Operating 214,053 249,095 144,382 243,123 Capital/Leases 63,991 0 38,721 7,000 410,398 TOTAL 434,821 409,482 326,479 Revenue: Fees 127,887 157,700 177,959 167,072 State/Federal 0 0 0 0 Local 306,934 251,782 148,520 243,326 410,398 TOTAL 434,821 409,482 326,479 Full-time Positions 0 0 0 0 Increase/Decrease FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Amount % -112 -5,972 7,000 -0.07% -2.40% 100.00% 916 0.22% 9,372 5.94% 0 0.00% -8,456 -3.36% 916 0.22% 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 151 FY 2016 - 2017 Instruction Admin./Attendance & Health Pupil Transportation Operation & Maintenance Facilities Technology School Debt Service Transfers School Nutrition Services School Textbook Private Purpose Funds School Capital Fund NREP Operating Fund NREP Textbook Fund Consolidated Services SCHOOLFUNDS Schools 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $100,338,683 $113,461,369 $116,910,372 $3,449,003 3.04% 5,648,324 6,387,423 6,771,401 383,978 6.01 % 8,275,541 8,698,744 8,767,835 69,091 0.79% 11,862,433 12,842,221 13,423,274 581,053 4.52% 171,708 204,412 206,887 2,475 1.21% 5,638,600 5,965,019 6,565,886 600,867 10.07% 13,999,653 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 425,797 469,739 565,345 95,606 20.35% 4,443,951 6,626,934 6,669,757 42,823 0.65% 906,097 1,900,544 2,666,452 765,908 40.30% 15,308 75,000 75,000 0 0.00% 1,136,445 500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 500,00% 4,290,687 5,259,238 5,346,744 87,506 1.66% 11,644 40,000 50,000 10,000 25.00% 2,898,133 3,600,000 3,600,000 0 0.00% $160,063,004 $181,267,128 1 $191,065,242 $9,798,114 5.41 % Private Pmmnse_ 0.00/. NREP. 2.8% School Nutrition Servic 3.5% School Textbook, School Debt Service, 8.6%� Technology, 3.4% Facilities, 0.1% Operation & Maint., 7.0% Pupil Transportation, 4.6%, Admin./Attendance & Health, 3.5% Consolidated Services, 1.9% School Capital, 1.6% Transfers, 0.3% fiction, 61.2% County of Frederick, VA 179 FY 2016 - 2017 SCHOOL DEBT SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Whenever extensive building programs are developed by the school board and loans through bonds and the Virginia Literary Fund are procured, it is necessary to set tip a schedule of repayment over a twenty year period. The funds in this category include principal and interest for Virginia Public School Authority Bonds, Virginia Literary Fund payments and principal and interest for interim financing as required. An additional cost included in this budget are fees for handling bonds and fees charged for investing VPSA bond proceeds. Increased finding from the County Board of Supervisors is required due to scheduled financing repayments on the construction of the replacement Frederick County Middle School. GOALS: • To repay the money borrowed through bond issuance and literary loans over a twenty year period. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % Costs: Personnel 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% Operating 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% Capital/Leases 0 0 0 0 0.00% TOTAL 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 794% Revenue: Fees 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% State/Federal 275,783 337,043 337,043 370,524 33,481 9.93% Local 14,626,151 14,899,442 14,899,442 16,075,765 1,176,323 7.90% TOTAL 14,901,934 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% Full-time Positions 0 0 0 01 0 0.00% v County of Frederick, VA T 187 FY 2016 - 2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY 2016-2017 The Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local planning commission. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP consists of a separate document that was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 25, 2015. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plan as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan. Frederick County approved the 2030 Comprehensive Plan on July 3, 2011. The Capital Improvements Plan is strictly advisory. It is possible that particular projects may not be fiinded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. Transportation projects are included in the CIP. The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. Impact of the Capital Program on the Operating BudLiet: The Capital Program has three direct impacts on the Operating Budget. The primary impact is in the Debt Service accounts. The greatest part of the county's capital improvement costs have been funded through the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, which generally are repaid over a period of twenty years. The only debt of this nature is fiinding for the construction of schools. The second impact of the Capital Program upon the Operating Budget is in the Cash Capital account. Cash Capital is the appropriation of General Fund monies to fund capital improvement projects. Financing capital projects on a pay-as-you-go basis minimizes the need for issuing bonds and substantially reduces current and future debt service costs. The third and final impact of the CIP on the Operating Budget arises when the CIP project is completed and the county must operate and maintain the new facility. In some instances, the costs re absorbed within the current budget of the department(s) providing the service. In other- instances, such as the opening of a new school, direct operating and maintenance costs, as well as increases in the staff must be budgeted on an ongoing basis. The Capital Improvements Plan developed by the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee is presented on the following page. NOTE: The FY 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan is the most recent Board approved CIP at time of print of this document. The CIP process is currently under review in order to make it more relevant, useful, and accurate. County of Frederick, VA 195 FY 2016 - 2017 r C� Frederick County, Virginia Additional Miscellaneous/Demograpliie Statistics Demographic Profile] Percent Value Frederick County, Virginia Virginia USA Frederick County, Virginia Virginia USA Demographics Population' -- - 83,199 8,382,993 321,418,820 Population Annual Average Growth` 1.8% 1.0% 0.8% 1,328 80,589 2,590,222 Median Age' - - -- 39.1 37.5 37.2 Under 18 Years 25.1% 23.2% 24.0% 19,675 1,853,677 74,181,467 18 to 24 Years 7.9% 10.0% 9.9% 6,179 802,099 30,672,088 25 to 34 Years 1 1.7% 13.6% 13.3% 9,183 1,090,419 41,063,948 35 to 44 Years 14.6% 13.9% 13.3% 11,431 1,108,928 41,070,606 45 to 54 Years 16.0% 15.2% 14.6% 12,558 1,214,000 45,006,716 55 to 64 Years 1 1.9% 11.9% 11.8% 9,325 954,964 36,482,729 65 to 74 Years 7.5% 6.9% 7.0% 5,859 549,804 21,713,429 75 Years and Over 5.2% 5.3% 6.0% 4,095 427,133 18,554,555 Race: White 89.3% 68.6% 72.4% 69,934 5,486,852 223,553,265 Race: Black or African American 4.1% 19.4% 12.6% 3,175 1,551,399 38,929,319 Race: American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% 0.4% 0.9% 234 29,225 2,932,248 Race: Asian 1.2% 5.5% 4.8% 969 439,890 14,674,252 Race: Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 34 5,980 540,013 Race: Some Other Race 3.0% 3.2% 6.2% 2,379 254,278 19,107,368 Race: Two or More Races 2.0% 2.9% 2.9% 1,580 233,400 9,009,073 Hispanic or Latino of an race 6.6% 7.9% 16.3% 5,168 631,825 50,477,594 Economic Labor Force Participation Rate and Size (civilian population 16 years and over)" 67.2% 64.8% 63.5% 42,542 4,229,948 157,940,014 Armed Forces Labor Force 0.1% 1.7% 0.4% 79 108,658 1,025,497 Veterans, Age 18-64 9.0% 9.1% 5.8% 4,449 470,379 11,371,344 Median Household Income 3.4-- -- S68,719 S64,792 S53,482 Poverty Level (of all people)' 5.9% 11.5% 15.6% 4,641 914,237 1 47,755,606 Mean Commute Time minutes 30.0 27.8 25.7 Commute via Public Transportation' 0.3% 4.5% 5.1% 118 178,442 7,157,671 Union Membership' 3.4% 4.7% 11.1% -- Housing Total Housing Units' 31,877 3,403,241 132,741,033 Median House Value (of owner-occu icd units)3 .' -- -- S223,300 S243,500 S 175,700 Homeowner Vacancy 2.5% 1.8% 2.1% 579 37,033 1,591,421 Rental Vacancy" 3.2% 6.4% 6.9% 220 71,372 3,105,361 Renter-occu icd Housing Units % of Occupied Units)" 22.3% 33.3% 35.6% 6,502 1,013,466 41,423,632 Occupied Housing Units w/no Vehicle Available (% of Occupied Units" 3.8% 6.4% 9.1% 1,116 194,153 10,594,153 Social No High School Diploma (educational attainment, age 25-64)4 10.7% 9.9% 12.0% 4,652 439,874 19,939,890 High School Graduate (educational attainment, age 25- 64)4 28.9% 23.9% 26.5% 12,534 1,062,241 44,000,387 Some College, No Degree (educational attainment, age 25-64)4 21.7% 20.6°/n 21.9% 9,437 914,402 36,270,359 Associate's Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 ' 8.2% 7.7% 8.7% 3,571 342,942 14,487,486 Bachelor's Degree educational attainment, a e 25-64 19.3% 22.3% 19.7% 8,386 991,434 32,646,533 Post ad Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 ' 11.1% 15.5% 11.2% 4,836 689,184 18,533,513 Enrolled in Grade 12 % of population)' 1.7% 1.3% 1.4% 1,344 107,840 4,443,768 Disabled, Age 18-64 10.0% 9.1% 10.2% 4,895 460,216 19,703,061 Foreign Born 5.8% 1 1.6% 13.1% 4,657 948,484 1 41,056-885 source: )nt"FQI;. I. Census 2010, unless otherwise noted 2. Census 2015. mutual average growth rate since 2005 7. Median values for certain aggregate regions (i.e. MSAs) may be estimated as weighted averages of median values from composing counties 4. ACS 2010.2014 5. 2014; Current Population Survey, unionsials.com, and Chaim; county -and zip -level dma County of Frederick, VA 209 FY 2016 - 2017 0 • Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts THE CIP TABLE CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Department Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contribution- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional fiinding sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs- The cost for each project, including county allocations and other funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in the 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project cost to the county of $1,015,369,550. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. • School projects are fiuided through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come fi•om the unreserved fiend balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of finding for projects not fiinded by the county. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. • The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. 21 County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Ensuing Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ Public Schools Elementary School #12 S1,600,000 S30,800,000 $32,400,000 $32,400,000 Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation Robert E. Aylor Middle School $1,400,000 S10,730,000 $8,970,000 $9,900,000 $31,000.000 S31,000,000 Addition and Renovation Fourth High School S1,700,000 $35,500.000 S32,200,000 $19,400,000 $3,100,000 $91,900,000 $91,900,000 James Wood High School Renov. (Prior to FY2015-2016 Cost) TBD TBD Sherando High School Parking Lot & Softball Field Improvements TBD TBD Dowell J. Howard Center Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Phase 2 Renovation $8,900,000 S8,900,000 S8,900,000 Bass Hoover Elementary Phase 2 Renovation $9,000,000 $9,000.000 S9,000,000 County/School Board Administration Building TBD TBD Indian Hollow Elementary Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Elementary School#13 $24.700,000 S24,700,000 $24,700,000 Fifth Middle School S49,500,000 $49,500.000 $49,500,000 $4.700,000 $77,030,000 $41,170,000 $29.300.000 SO S92,100,000 $247,400,000 S247,400,000 Parks & Recreation Clearbrook & Sherando Water Slide/Spray Ground $1,352,000 $1,352,000 $1,352.000 Sherando Access Road w/Parking/Trails $1,567,000 $1,567,000 S1,567,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility 5480,000 $14.683,000 $15,163,000 $15,163,000 Snowden Bridge Park Development $3.161,000 $3,161,000 $3,161,000 Sherando Softball Complex $682,000 $682,000 $682,000 Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $85,000 $148,000 $2,702,000 $2,935,000 $2,935,000 Sherando LakefTrails/Parking- 2 Fields S103,000 S1,261,000 $1,384,000 $1,384,000 Community Parks (3) $6,352,000 $6,352,000 S6,352,000 Neighborhood Parks (3) $2,285,000 $2,285,000 S2,285,000 District Parks (4) S15,717,000 $15,717,000 $15,717,000 Sherando Picnic Areas $818,000 $818,000 $818,000 Indoor Ice Rink $6,102,000 $6,102,000 $6,102,000 Community Center $8,952,0o0 $8,952,000 $8,952,000 Clearbrook Open Play Areas $487,000 $487,000 $487,000 Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade $1,300,000 $1,300,000 S1,300,000 Soccer/Multi Use Fields $1,141.000 $1,141,000 $1,141,000 Clearbrook Tennis/Basketball Complex $535,000 S535,000 $535,000 Sherando Skateboard Park $522.000 $522.000 $522,000 Clearbrook Shelter Stage $517.000 $517,000 $517,000 Fleet Trip Vehicles $295,000 $295.000 S295.000 • • V County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Sherando Maintenance Compound S381,000 $381,000 $381,000 S6,645,000 $24,253,000 $35.572,000 $3.985,000 $1,193,000 SO $71,648.000 $71.648.000 Regional Library Gainesboro Library S155,023 $1,465,736 $128,275 S1,749,034 $1,749,034 Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD Route 522 South LibraryBranch TBD TBD SO $155,023 S1,465,736 $128,275 SO s0 S1,749,034 $1,749,034 Transportation Funded Priorities 1-81 Exit 310 Improvements $49,121,000 $49,121,000 E S49,121,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 1) S36,082,000 S36,082,000 E $36,082,000 East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over 81 $6,000,000 S6,000,000 E $6,000,000 Unfunded Priorities Route 37 Engineering & Constructior $300,000,000 $300.000,000 E $300,000.000 1-81 Exit 307 Relocation $60,000,000 S60,000,000 E $60,000,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 2) $15,000,000 $15,000,000 E $15,000,000 Redbud Road Realignment $2,500,000 $2,500,000 E $2,500,000 Warrior Drive Extension $23,200,000 $23,200,000 E $23,200,000 Channing Drive Extension $20,600,000 $20,600,000 E $20,600,000 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign. $3,000,000 $3,000,000 E S3,000,000 Widening of Route 11 North $47,800,000 $47,800,000 E S47,800,000 Senseny Road Widening $22,800,000 $22.800,000 E S22,800,000 Invedee Way $10,200,000 $10,200,000 E S10,200,000 Fox Drive $250,000 S250,000 E $250,000 Rennaisance Drive $2,000,000 $2,000,000 E $2,000,000 Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD TBD $300,000,000 Sol SO s0 SO $298,553,000 $598,553.000 S598,553,000 Winchester Airport New General Avaiation Terminal $380.000 $2,600,000 A,B $2,980,000 Northside Connector $1,250.000 A,B $1,250,000 New Terminal Parking Lot S650,000 A,B $650,000 Land Parcel 64-A-66 $275.000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64-A-67 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-33A $175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-60 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-40 $175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-64 S275,000 A,B $275.000 Fuel Storage Facility S1,000,000 A,B S1,000000 Land Parcel 64B-A-47 $300.000 A,B $300:000 Land Parcel 64-A-49 $300,000 A,B $300.000 Land Parcel 64-A-50 $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 $235,0001 1 1 A,B $235,000 a • County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Land Parcel 64B-A-52 $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel64-A-59 $300,000 A,B $300,000 North Side Svc Road $406.000 A,B $400,000 Taxiway "A" Relocation $200,000 $4,650,000 $4,800,000 A,B S9,650,000 $2.660,000 $1,655,000 S3,250,000 $2,100,000 $4,650,000 S4,800,000 So $19.115,000 County Administration Clearbrook Convenience Site $20,000 $357,850 $377,850 E S377,850 Albin Convenience Site $24,000 $418,850 S442,850 $442,850 RelocationlExpansion Gore Site S24,000 $325,550 S349,550 $349,550 General Government Capital Exper S200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 County/Schoot Board Administration Building TBD TBD E TBD Joint Judicial Center Renovation / New Facility $4,065,500 $20,000,000 $24,065,500 E $24,065,500 $4.285,500 $581,8501 $642,850 $525,550 $200,000 S20,000,000 $26,235,750 $26,235,750 Fire & Rescue Fire & Rescue Station ##22 (277) $400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 F&R Station #22 (277) Apparatus $100,000 $805,000 $905,000 $905,000 Fire & Rescue Station ##23 $550,000 $2,150,600 $1,000,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 Regional Training Center $75,000 $100,000 $1.250,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 $31,175,000 $31,175,000 Fire & Rescue Station 424 (Gainesboro) S250,000 S3,500,000 $3,750,000 C $3,750,000 Station #13 (Clearbrook) Relocation S33,000 S88,0001 S4,275,000 S4,396,000 E S4,396,000 $608,000 $3,293,000 $12.675.000 $11,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 47,326,000 $47.326.000 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,0001000 E $1,000,000 ' See Fire & Rescue Company Requests (LS100K) $550,000 Apparatus Ventilation System for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $550,000 C $550,000 $550,000 Office and Living Quarters for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue_ Co. $550,000 C $550,000 $100,000 Life Pack x3 for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $100,000 C $100,000 $800,000 Rescue Engine Replacement for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $800,000 C $800,000 $342,766 North Mountain Fire & Rescue Co.Buildin Expansion $342,766 C S342,766 $2,542,766 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 50 $3,342.766 $3,342,766 Total 1 $321.441,2661 S107,167,873 $94,975,586 S47,238,825 S15,743,000 S425,703,000 5996,254,550 $1,015,369,550 `Fire & Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests (c$100K) None A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation B- Partial funding from FAA C- Partial funding from pnvato donations D- Funding goes beyond displayed 5 ycan � E- Partial funding anticipated through development 8 revenue sources F- Funding initiated pnw to d ,played 5 years NIA- Not Available TBD- To be Determined $0 Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Multifamily Mobile Home/Other Totals Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Southern Hills Phase II July 22, 2016 Student Generation Housing Units## 130 0 0 0 130 School Cost Program Capacity Per Student Cost Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Elementary School Student Generation 25 0 0 0 25 Capital Costs Elementary School Cost (2016-21 CIP) S24,700,000 850 529,059 25 $726,000 Middle School Student Generation 12 0 0 0 12 Middle School Cost (2016-21 CIP) 549,500,000 940 552,660 12 $632,000 High School Student Generation 14 0 0 0 14 Hiah School Cost (2016-21 CIP) $91,900,000 1,725 553,275 14 $746,000 Total Student Generation 51 0 0 0 Total Capital Costs $2,104,000 I* 0 Annual Operational Costs This Development's Impact on FOPS Operational Costs Average Annual Operational Cost Per Unit FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Budget) $11,584 I School Facility Information Total Student Annual Generation Impact 51 $591,000 $4,546 Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) 2016-17 School Attendance Zone" Bass -Hoover R.E. Aylor Sherando June 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 1,518 2016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 1,400 h - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. - Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. 0 US Census Bureau Household and Families Document Table 2. Households by 'Fype: 2000 and (For infnrmatinn nn rnnfirlpntiality nrotection 2010 nonsamolina errors, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen20101doc/sfi.pdn Household type 2000 2010 Change, 2000 to 2010 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total households .................... 105,480,101 100.0 116,716,292 100.0 11,236,191 10.7 Family household .......................... 71,787,347 68.1 77,538,296 66.4 5,750,949 8.0 Husband -wife households ................. 54,493,232 51.7 56,510,377 48.4 2,017,145 3.7 With own children ...................... 24,835,505 23.5 23,588,268 20.2 -1,247,237 -5.0 Without own children ................... 29,657,727 28.1 32,922,109 28.2 3,264,382 11.0 Female householder, no spouse present...... 12,900,103 12.2 15,250,349 13.1 2,350,246 18.2 With own children ...................... 7,561,874 7.2 8,365,912 7.2 804,038 10.6 Without own children ................... 5,338,229 5.1 6,884,437 5.9 1,546,208 29.0 Male householder, no spouse present........ 4,394,012 4.2 5,777,570 5.0 1,383,558 31.5 With own children ...................... 2,190,989 2.1 2,789,424 2.4 598,435 27.3 Without own children ................... 2,203,023 2.1 2,988,146 2.6 785,123 35.6 Nonfamily households ...................... 33,692,754 31.9 39,177,996 33.6 5,485,242 16.3 Male householder ....................... 15,556,103 14.7 18,459,253 15.8 2,903,150 18.7 Living alone .......................... 11,779,106 11.2 13,906,294 11.9 2,127,188 18.1 Not living alone ........................ 3,776,997 3.6 4,552,959 3.9 775,962 20.5 Female householder ..................... 18,136,651 17.2 20,718,743 17.8 2,582,092 14.2 Living alone .......................... 15,450,969 14.6 17,298,615 14.8 1,847,646 12.0 Not living alone ........................ 2,685,682 2.5 3,420,128 2.9 734,446 27.3 Unmarried couple households' ............... 5,475,768 5.2 7,744,711 6.6 2,268,943 41.4 Opposite -sex partners .................... 4,881,377 4.6 6,842,714 5.9 1,961,337 40.2 Same -sex partners' Summary File 1 counts ................. 594,391 0.6 901,997 0.8 307,606 51.8 Preferred estimates .................... 358,390 0.3 646,464 0.6 288,074 80.4 Average household size .................... 2.59 N 2.58 N - 0.01 W Average family size ........................ 3.14 N 3.14 W 0.00 K (X) Not applicable. ' Unmarried couple households can be family or nonfamily households depending on the relationship of others in the household to the householder. In this table, it is the sum of opposite -sex partners and samo-sex partners from Summary File 1 counts. Y Summary File 1 counts In this table are consistent with Summary File 1 counts shown In American Factfinder. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1 and 2010 Census Summary File 1. average household size decreased over the decade, from 2.59 to 2.58, but average family size stayed the same, 3.14.E These indicators show a slowing of the downward trends that have existed since the end of the Baby Boom in the 1 960s. In 1960, the average house- hold size was 3.29 people per G Average family size is the number of family members in the household (persons related to the householder including the householder) per family household. This computation excludes persons not related to the householder. household, and the average family size was 3.65 people per family.' The number of households within each category type increased in the last 10 years, including husband - wife households, which increased ' Average household size for 1960 may be found in Frank Hobbs and Nicole Stoops, "Demographic Trends in the 20th Century," Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-4 (November 2002). Figure 5-3. Average family size for 1960 may be found in U.S. Census Bureau, 1960 Census of Population, Supplementary Reports, PC(SU-38, Families in the United States: 1960, Table 280. by 2.0 million. Figure 2 shows that, despite this increase, in 2010 less than half of all households (48 per- cent) were husband -wife house- holds, down from 52 percent in 2000 and 55 percent in 1990. This is the first time that husband -wife families fell below 50 percent of all households in the United States since data on families were first U.S. Census Bureau • AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 17, 2007 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: February 28, 2007 ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING 1122-06 OF SOUTHERN HILLS WHEREAS, Rezoning B22-06 of Soutbern Hills, submitted by Rrilliarn H. Gordon -Associates, Inc., to rezone 15.53916 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District with proffers, and 90 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, for residential and commercial uses, was considered. The properties are located approximately 2,800 feet south of the intersection of Route 277 and Town Run Lane, in the Opequon Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 85D-I-1-1 through 85D-1-1.- 9513and 85-A-138. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 17, 2007; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on February 28, 2007; and - WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREWORE, 13E IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, 'Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 15.53916 acres from Rl' (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District with proffers, and 90 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, for residential and commercial uses, as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owners. PDRes. 110-07 n This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 281h day of February, 2007 by the following recorded vote; Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Gary Dove Gene E. Fisher Philip A. Lemieux PDRes. 1110-07 Aye Barbara E. Van Osten Aye _ Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Aye A COPY ATTEST Jo R)Ufey, Jr.'- l/ ` Fr deoCk County Administrator 9 n PROFFER STATEME-1T Southern 11Wl .Srrhdivision Rezoniu: Rezoning Application No. 22-06. Rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) (90 acres) and 132 Commercial (15.54 acres). Property See Attachment A for Propeny Idcnti(ication Nos. (Opequon Magisterial District) Record Owtter: Arcadia Development Co.; Arcadia -Southern hills, L.L.C.; Southern Hills I-Iomeowners Association, Tile. Applicant: ArcadiaDevelopmcnt Co. Project Name: Southern Hills Original pate of Proffers: June 6, 2001 Revision Date: January 31, 2007 Preliminail, Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 et, seq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning, Ordinance with respect to conditional rezoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia shall approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06 for the rezoning of 105.511 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (10) [90 acres) acid B2 Commercial [ 15,54 acres) with revised proffers, development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terns and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever and all proffers currently in effect on the subject property as of the date this document was executed by the applicant shall continue in full force and effect. These proffers shall be binding on the applicant and its legal successors and assigns. lylonetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development The undersigned, who owns the above -described property, hereby voluntarily proffers that if the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia approves the rezoning for the approximately 105 acres, with frontage along Town Run Lane in the. Opequon Magisterial District of Frederick County, Virginia from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) [90 acres] and B2 Commercial [ 15.54 acres], the undersigned will pay to Frederick County at the time a building permit is applied for and issued the, sum of $4,910.00 per residential lot. This monetary proffer provides for 53,581.00 for Frederick County Schools; $599.00 for Frederick County Parks and Recreation; 5446.00 for Frederick County Fire and Rescue; S 105.00 for Public Library; $59.00 for Sheriffs Office and S 121.00 for Administration Building. General Devetopmcnt PLtll Should the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06, then in such event development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the attached voluntarily -proffered revised Generalized Development Plan including the following improvements: 1. On the 90 acres to be zoned RP no more than 88 single-family detached urban residence units and no more than 232 towlihouse units shall be constructed. The balance of the property zoned 132 commercial shall be developed in accordance with the uses specified in the B2 commercial zoning district. The development of the public street network shall be in general conformance with the revised Generalized Development Plan dated October. 2006. 2. Stickley Drive (SR 1095) shall be extended as shown to connect with Town Run Lane (SR 1012) during the first phase of development (A to B). 3. Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall he overlayed -vith a bituminous concrete surface from B to C. Guard rail shall be installed right and left along Town Run Lane "[ill" areas greater than 7' vertical. The improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of work. This work shall be done prior to the issuance of the 50'h building permit. 4. Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be overlayed with a bituminous concrete surface from C to D during the phase where the entrance at D' is constructed. These iniprovelments are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of the work. 5. An easement shall be eslublishcd 75' in depth along the South property line E to F. This easement will be prominently shown on the final plat and will restrict consuvction of homes as well as limiting the clear cutting of trees larger than 4" diameter. [This proffer was fulfilled and recorded on the Southern Hills Subdivision Phase I Final Subdivision Pill, Instrument No.060011588.] 0 6. A statement shall be added to the plat and covenants for all lots created by this project advising that agricultural uses exist on the South and East, the Ewing Family cemetery exists within the limits of development, and wastewater treatment Facilities exist or previously existed to the North of this site. 7. The f;wing Family cemetery will be set aside as a separate lot with public access via an appropriate casement(s) and conveyed, if possible, to the Ewing family with covenants for future maintenance by the Ewing family. 8. A contribution of 100,000 for conshlrction funding shall be made at the time VDOT implements the construction of a stoplight at the intersection of Stickley Drivc and Rle. 277. ['Phis proffer was fulfilled on March 3, 2005] 9. The Properly Owner agrees to dedicate the rit!hl-of-way as shown on the revised Generalized Development Platt for the fulurc Warrior Drive extension (the "road") across that portion of (lie Owner's property zoned B2 Commercial in the location depicted on t})c Generalized Development Plan. The Property Owner agrees to dedicate the right-of-way for the road within ninety (90) days of a written request by the County, provided that Rezoning Application No. 22-06 has been approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors and till applicable appeal periods have expired and no appeal has been filed. The Owner's dedication of the tight -of -way for the road i, further conditioned on the following: (a) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a covenant running with the land, a tinting the Owner the right, at any time in the future and at Owner's expense, to place underground utilities across, or parallel to, the dedicated right-of-way for the road (including, but not limited to, gas, electric, cable, telephone, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterline); (b) the deed dedicating [he right-of-way shall contain language, as a covenant running with the land, requiring that the road shall have, at the Owner's discretion, a minimum of two entrances from the north side of Warrior Drive into the Owner's proposed commercial development, which two entrances shall meet applicable VDOT and County regulations and entrance spacing standards and be engineered into the design of the road, with turning lanes as required, for the full development of the subject property, during the design phase of the road; and requiring that the Owner and/or its designated representative(s) be entitled to meaningfully participate in the dcsigii of the road as regards the location and design of the two entrances; and (c) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a covenant mmning with the land, granting the Owner, its successors and assigns, the right at any times) in the future, to establish and locate construction and/or grading easements over and across the dedicated right- of-way in locations determined by the Owner, its successors and assigns, to be necessary for the development of the B2 Commercial property and/or (he Residential PCrf0171111111d:C (RP) property provided that, upon construction of the road as a public street accepted into tale state highway system by VDOT, the langunge regarding easements contained in this subparagraph 9 (c) shall thereupon be considered void. 10. Owner agrees that no greater than ten percent (10%) of the 676,885 maximum allowable commercial squarc footage in the B2 zone shall be constructed before the portion of the Warrior Drive extension road traversing Owner's property is constructed. 1 1. Owner agrees to limit residential building permits on the Property to a maximum of seventy-five (75) permits per year, on a calendar basis commencing January I, 2007, provided however that any unissued (but otherwise allowable) yearly permits will accumulate to Owner's benefit for subsequent years. For example, i= Owner pulls only 50 building permits in 2007, Owner shall be entitled to 100 permits in 2008; should Owner pull only 50 permits in 2008, Owner shall be entitled to 125 permits in 2009. Residential building permits issues prior to January 1, 2007 are not to be considered a part of this proffer. The conditions proffered above shall be binding, upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the Applicant and Owner. In the event (he Frederick: County Board of Supervisors ;rants said rezoning and accepts these conditions, the proffered conditions shall supersede all previous proffered conditions applicable to the Property and shall apply to the Properly rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code, Respectfully submitted, A.RCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. Property Owner y. Its: pre';,Jeof Date: /h//(i J ARCADIA-SOUTHERN HILLS, L.L.C. Prop .y Owner Its: Dater 1 lei SOU"1,12RN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, IlgC. y,/ its:��— Date: —At 1 __—_ IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #8-';1)- 1 - 1 -95 June 30, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com Greenway Engineering • June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose Of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by the proffered rezoning Of a 40.36±-acre subject property owned by Arcadia C011111ullitieS, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner"). The subject property is identified as Tax Map Parcel 851)-1-1-95, which is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles SOuth of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The Subject property is split -zoned and is comprised of 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B-2, Business General District. The subject property is a component of a 105± acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01-01) and subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre subject property to illaintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District land area, and to modify the proFFer Statement to limit development of the 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District to a maxilnunl of 130 single- family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' fight -Of -Way area within the 2.57± acre B-2, Business General District portion Of' the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to aCCO111111OCIate the future extension Of' SOLith Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered under Rezoning Application #22- 06. Basic i11formation Location: Fronting on the east side of. Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 Miles SOuth Of the 111tC1'SCCtio11 with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) Magisterial District: Tax Map Parcel Number: Opequon District 85D-1-1-95 File 113126V Impact Analysis Slalement/HAW Greenway i?ngineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Current Zoning: RP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Current Use: Undeveloped (Note: Single-family detached residential lots platted and some lots developed in Southern Hills — Phase I ) Proposed Zoning: RP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) 13-2, BLISiness General District (2.57± acres) Proposed Use: Single -Family Detached Residential Lots (RP District) Public Street Reservation Area (132 District) Total Rezoning Area: 40.36±-acres with revised proffers for the subject property COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Urban Development Area The Urban Development Area (UDA) defines the general area in which residential, commercial, indllStrial and IrlStitUtional Ind Use developrllent IS CIICOLlraged ill the COLinty. The 40.36±-acre Subject property is currently located within the UDA; therefore, expansion Of the UDA bOUndary t0 accommodate the I)I'Oposed development Of single-family detached residential lots and a public Street reservation area for the future extension 01' South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Sewer and Water Service Area The Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) is generally consistent with the UDA, but also extends outside of the UDA to accommodate areas of the County in which commercial and industrial land use development is only desired. The 40.36±-acre subject property is Currently located within the SWSA; therefore, expansion of the SWSA boundary to accommodate the proposed development of single-family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the future extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Comprehensive Plan Conformity The 40.36±-acre Subject property is located in the UDA and the SWSA and is within the study area boundary of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan is a large -area plan that identifies land Uses, transportation ❑etworks, and Other matters that are recommended for conslderati011 for flltUre land Use and Cleve101)ment within this geographic area of the County. The 40.36±-acre Subject property is identified for residential and bLISiness land LISC; thercfore, the proposed IZP, Residential Performance District and B-2, File #3126V Impact Analysis Stalement/l AW • Creenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning BLISiness General District rezoning Is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan Transportation Map identifies a new minor arterial road System that traverses the subject property. The alignment of the new minor arterial road is located within the 13-2, Business General District portion of the subject property, which has been identified as a public Street reservation area; therefore, the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The 40.36±-acre Subject property is located on the east side of Town RLul Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles SOuth Of* the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). Access to the Single-family detached residential lots will be provided along Town Run Lane and through a system Of public Streets internal to the RP, Residential Performance District portion ot'the subject property. The single-family detached residential lots will not have access from the B-2, BLISiness General District port10r1 Of the Sllb_lect property that has beeIl established by deed as a future public street reservation area. Flood Plains The 40.36±-acre Subject property contains a small area of floodplain within the B-2, Business General District portion of the subject property along the eastern property line that is associated with Stephens Run. The subject property is located within FEMA NFIP Map #51069C0330D, Effective Date September 2, 2009, and is primarily located within Flood Zone X with the exception Ol the small area of floodplalll within the B-2, Business General District portion 01 the SLlbject p1'Operty. The single-1'amily detached residential lots proposed l'or Southern I -fills — Phase 2 are located c0111pletely outside of the tloodplain limits. Wf>ilnni-lc The 40.36±-acre Subject property does not contain wetland areas as demonstrated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map information from the Frederick County GIS Database. I-lowever, the Southern I -fills ]Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007 identities delineated wetland areas along the Southern boundary of the subject property. The delineated wetland areas are located within the open space portion Of the Subject property and will not be impacted by the developed of the single-family detached residential lots proposed for Southern Hills — Phase 2. Soil Types The 40.36±-acre subject property contains three Soil types as demonstrated by the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia and the Frederick County GIS Database. The following Soil type is present on site: File I8126V Impact Analysis Statemen[IFAW Greenway Engincering • June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning 9B: Clearbrook Channery Silt Loams 2-7% slopes 32C: Blairton Silt Loams 7-15% slopes 41 C/D/E: Weikert-Berks Channery Sill Loams 7-65% slopes None of the soil types within the subject property are identified as a prime agricultural Soil and all types have high shrink/swell properties. The 40.36±-acre Subject properly has similar Soil C0I1Chli011S as Southern Hills — Phase 1, which has been developed with public streets and single-family detached residential lots. Other Environmental Features The 40.36±-acre Subject property does not Contain areas of steep slope, lakes or ponds or nalLlral sLormwater retention areas as clef'ined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and as delineated on the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007. There are no known environmental features present that create development constraints for the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2. ADJOINING PROPERTIES Adjoining propertyzoning onin and present usC: North: B-2, Business General District South: RP, IZCSidCntial PCI'f0r'n1a11CC D1Str'iCt East: IZP, Residential Performance District West: RA, Rural Areas District TRANSPORTATION Use: Unimproved Use: SOLlthern Hills — Phase 1 Use: Southern Hills — Phase 1 Use: Unimproved The 40.36±-acre subject property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles South of the intersection with Fairl'ax Pike (Route 277). The Subject property is generally identified as Southern Hills — Phase 2 (the muddle section of the SOLItlICI'11 Hills Subdivision). Frederick County originally approved Rezoning Application #01-01, which established RP, Residential Performance District zoning over the 105± acre parent tract that ilICIUdCS the 40.36± acre Subject property. The approved Proffer Statement POI' this 1'CZ011Ing I'CgUll'CCI the 105± acre property to be developed as single family lots and included several of'I'-site transportation improvements. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained the single Family lots within Idle 10126V Impact Analysis Statement/FAW 5 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning SOLlthern Hills - Phase 1 and modified the remainder OI the pi•OICCL area t0 allow for 232 townhouse lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 and to allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of' the project (Southern Hills — Phase 3). The approved Proffer Statement For this rezoning carried forward the transportation improvements from the original proffers, restricted the Southern Hills - Phase 2 Land Bay to townhouse lots, and provided tor a 100' right-of-way area between the townhouses and the commercial land bay to accommodate the Future extension Oi' South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. The original property owner implemented the proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06. These transportation improvements are identified On the Transportation Proffer Compliance Mal) Exhibit and include the following: Completion of' the extension of' Stickley Drive (Route 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to I'acilitate a new traffic pattern t0 Fairfax Pike (Route 277). i Installation OI gLlardrall along Town RLlll Lane (R011te 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. Completion of new surl'ace material overlay Of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along tale Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). The 40.36± acre subject property is inclusive of the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Land Bay that is approved for 232 townhouse lots; as well as the 100' right-of-way area to accommodate the IULL11•e CXLe1lS1011 Of SOLIth Warrior Drive. The Owner has reserved the 100' right-of-way area for I'Llture public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Prof'f'er Statement. This public street reservation is legally recorded by deed and plat as hlstrunient No. 160002930/0001, which is inCILlded as i1lfOrmation In the proposed rezoning application. The proposed Rezoning Application Prolicr Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides Ior a maxilllunl of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed traffic impacts associated with this rezoning request: EXISTING IMPACTS: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD PROPOSED IMPACTS: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD REDUCED IMPACT: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 505 VPD The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application has provided for the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT for the extension 01' SOLlth Warrior Drive as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Proffer Statement, and i)rCViOLIS development activities associated with File 63126V Impact Analysis StatemenUFAW 6 (ireenway lingincering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities. L.L.C. Rezoning the Southern Hills — Phase 1 Land Bay have implemented all other transportation improvements. Additionally, the proposed rezoning application results iIl a reclUCti011 Of 505 vehicles per clay that reduces impacts to the Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085) intersection. Therefore, the proposed rezoning application adequately mitigates transportation impacts to Frederick County. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND 'TREATMENT The 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public sewer based On County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider Of public sewer service within this area of the County and Currently has sewer infrastructure within Southern Hills — Phase 1 that includes gravity sewer lines, a pump station and a four -inch sewer force main that directs effluent to a 15-inch sewer transmission line to the Parkins Mill Treatment Facility (PMTF). The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/day per residential connection Is an appropriate CalCUlatlon for estiil7ating the sewer demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed sewer demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; thereforC, the projected sewer demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/clay/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -Out PIZOPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maxlllll1111 of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand Is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/clay/per residential connection Q = 300 GPI) x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -Out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction oi' 30,600 GPD of sewer demand front the Southern Hills — Phase 2 cevelopment proposal. The sewer system design for Southern Hills — Phase 2 will incorporate an on -site gravity Collection system that CI1rccts elllllCilt II'0111 the single-family detached residential lots to the existing FCSA pump station located immediately cast of the subject property. The existing pump station was clesigned, approved and constructed as a 0.135 MGD facility. The projected sewer demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots within File 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/I;AW 7 1 lone 30, 2016 Arcadii Greenway Engineering ia nununitics, L.L.C. Rezoning Southern Hills — Phase I and the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is approximately 50%n of the design capacity Of the existing FCSA pump station. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning ApplicatioIl can be accommodated by the existing FCSA sewer system infrastrLICtllre. WATER SUPPLY The 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public water based On County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation ALitllOrlty (FCSA) Is the provider of pllbllC Water service Within this area Of the Collllty and has an existing 12" Water lute located along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) that provides public water to the property. Additionally, a 12' water line and ail S" Water line have been ConStrUcted Wlthill SOLlthern Hills Phase 1 that extend to the Southern Hills — Phase 2 property. The Frederick County Sanitation ALlthority (FCSA) has dctcI-mincd that 300 gallons/day per residential Corinction Is all appropriate calClllatlon for estimating the water c1cmaild for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed water demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: SOLItilCl'il Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected Water demaild is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of' a I1laxilllll111 of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected Water deillaild is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build-OLIt REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 30,600 GPD of' water demand front the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The water system design for the SOLlthern Hills — Phase 2 single-family detached residential lots will expand on the existing water system that was developed for Southern Hills — Phase 1. This design will provide for water line looping to ensure that adequate water pressure is available for residential service and for fire Flow. The projected water demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase I and the File 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/FAW 8 (ireenvay Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities. 1-1-C. Rezoning proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer- demand o1' 67,200 GPD, which is a reduction of 30,600 GPD below the projected water needs for the Subject property. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application can be accommodated by FCSA and by the existing water system InfrastRICtllre. SITE DRAINAGE The 40.36±-acre Subject property has a drainage divide that directs drainage to the east and to the south to defined channels that flow alto Stephens Run. The proposed single-family detached residential lots will be developed as curb and gutter streets and will incorporate stormwater management design that will illClUde Storlllwater detention p0I1dS oil the eastern and Southern portion of the Subject property on the upper side of the Stephens Run drainage channels. Stormwater' gUahty mcaSUres will be evaluated dill"rllg the SUbdlvlsion Design Plan process and will be achieved thl'OLIgh on -site quality mcaSLII'eS or a combination of on -Site quality meaSUres and 11LIt1'ICl1t CI'editS if' necessary. The Stormwater quantity and quality measures will be designed in Conformance with all applicable state and local regulations; therefore, site drainage and stormwater management impacts to adjoining properties and the community will be adequately mitigated. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL The impact on solid waste disposal associated with the development of the 40.36± subject site can be projected 1'rom an average annual residential consumption of 5.4 cubic yards per household (Civil Engineering 1Zc1'ereilce Manual, 4`l' Edition). The Frederick County Public Works Department is responsible for Solid waste disposal as the manager of the Regional Landfill Facility. Existing and proposed Solid waste disposal demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 IS currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the pr'oJected solid waste demand 1S as follows: AV = 5.4 CLI. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 232 residential units AV = 1,253 Cu. Yd, at residential build -out, or 877 tons/yr at build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow 1'or the development of' a maxllnl1111 of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected solid waste demand is as follows: AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 130 residential units AV = 702 Cu. Ycl, at residential build -out, or 491 tons/yr at build -out File 113126V Impact Analysis StatemenUFAW 9 0 0 Greenway Engineering .tune 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rcioning REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of 386 tons/yr of solid waste demand front the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The MUnicipal Solid Waste area Of the Regional Landfill has a CUIrent remaining capacity Of 13,100,000 cubic yards of air space. The projected buildout of Southern Hills — Phase 2 will generate approximately 491 tolls of solid Waste anIlUally on average. This represents a 0.24% increase in the annual solid waste received by the Municipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill, Which CLII'relltly averages 200,000 tolls per year and 1S a 1'edLICt1011 fl'0111 the annual solid waste disposal that would otherwise occur under the existing residential land use plan. The Regional Landfill has adequate capacity to accommodate the solid waste impacts associated with this proposal. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify Structures deemed to be historically significant on the 40.36±-acre Subject property, nor does the survey identify properties within proximity of this site that are deemed potentially significant. The closest potentially Significant Structure is identified as the Wise-IZitenour House (34-1209), which is located approximately 0.3 miles Southeast of the Subject property. The National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify the 40.36±-acre subject property as being located within defined Civil War Battlefield study area boundaries. Therefore, the proposed single-family detached residential lot development plan for the subject property Will not Create negative 1111paCtS aSSOCiatCd With historic I'CSOLIrceS. COMMUNITY FACILITY IMPACTS The 40.36±-acre Subject property is a component Of a 105± acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01- 01) and subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (lezoning Application #22-06). Rezoning Application #22-06 was approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots, while the proposed Rezoning Application Would reduce this impact through the proffered maxlllllllll development Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Rezoning Application #22-06 provides for a total monetary Contribution value of $1,139,120.00 to offset impacts to COnlnlLlrlity facilities. The proposed Rezoning Application maintains this same level Of funding to offset impacts to conlnlunity facilities even though this proposal demonstrates a reduction of more than 100 residential lots. The Owner's Proffer Statement rCCiLlll'CS tile il1CILISi011 Of a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot that File 113126V Impact Analysis Statcmcni/FAW 10 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning egUates to the total monetary contribUtion Ot $ 1,139,120.00 divided by the total Iiumber Of single-family detached residential lots. This approach ensures that the Owner will provide the same level of funding to offset impacts to community facilities regardless it' the total number of lots I'alls below the maximUrn 130 single-family detached residential lots identified in the proposed Prol'I'er Statement. The school student generation impact to Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) is calculated by the County Development Impact Model (CDIM). Currently, the CDIM projects single-family detached residential land use at 0.40 Students per household (SFD = 0.19 Elementary School StLICICIAS; 0.10 Middle School Students; 0.1 1 High School Students) and projects tOW1111OUSC residential land use at 0.27 Students per household (TH = 0.13 Elementary School Students; 0.07 Middle School Students; 0.07 High School Students). Existing and proposed school student generation impact to FCPS is as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the SCIiOOI StUdeilt generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 63 students. PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a max1I1111111 Of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the school student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 52 students. REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction of I I school Students that will be generated 1'rom the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. OTHER POTENTIAL IMPACT'S The Ewing Family Cemetery is located Within the southeastern portion of the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Proffer Statements associated with Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 provided for the creation of a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public Street within the property; as well as all access easement from the public street to the cemetery that WOUld be maintained by the Ewing Family. The proposed Proffer Stateillent provides for this same commitment; therefore, there are no impacts associated with the Ewing Family Cemetery that will result 1'rom the development of single family detached residential lots on the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre Subject property to maintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, Business General District land area, and to modify the proper Statement to limit development of the 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District to a maximU111 OI' 130 single-family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' fight -Of -Way area Within the 2.57± acre B-2, BUSilICSS General District portion of the property as a reservation area for flltlll'e public Street CleClication to File 113126V Impact Analysis Statemem/FAW ] I Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning accommodate the f-uture extension of- South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered under Rezoning Application #22-06. This Rezoning Application results in a reduction of total vehicle trips, a reduction Of' sewer demand, a reduction of water demand, a 1-CC1LIC6011 of'solid waste demand, and a reduction of school Students, while maintain the same level of funding to offset impacts to community facilities proffered UndeI' Rezoning A11)Ilcation #22-06. The Owner's Proffer Statement I)I.OViCICS aSSUrallces for these redUCtions and fOl- th1S IUlldillg C011lmitlllellt; therelore, the proposed Rezoning Application has adegUately mitigated iml)acts to Frederick COL111ty. Attachments: Aerial Overview Map Is..hibit Southern Frederick Area Plan. Land Use Map Exhibit Location and Zoning Map Exhibit Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit SWSA & UDA Map Exhibit Environmental Features Map Exhibit FEMA FIRM Map Exhibit Soils Map Exhibit Historic Features Map Exhibit File 16126V Impact Analysis Statement/HAW 12 4. 40p LILI ILIJ z Cz > U.] < 0 ZD IPA 2 LLI 0 N < LLJ Cr Cli Air- z LU 0 Cf < -- L, Z Cr x W i > 1-- 0 LLJ LIJ Z --tiATVLNHURST- T- 1: '0, Legend z K s < C� z Cr 9 m Z Porto of TM 850 1 1-95 Subject to Rezo-9 Amendment LU 0 Lu T I 0 Pubhc Street Reservat*n Area Instrument No 160002930 C) Lu Feet Cr Parcel Boundary 0 u_ 400 0 400 9 Stephens Oty Town L.-Is ,O+ S— F.� M CwMy, W G4S Dqprww1t 20160— 2015A. l P"OsC—yOfVGN/VITA(ht%) I,gls vita 19— Q—Illgn —, . . ., , b- - - 19, FAfRFgx•PIKE Feet 0 500 �KEF¢cOLT -NAVVENMURST-CT------/ T 10 I RIDGE i Lelmend IJ Porbon of TM 85D-1-1-95 SUbpd to Rezoning Amendment Public Street Reeewabon Area - Ir*tn~t No 160002930 Parcel Boundary QStepnem City Town limits Frederick County Zoning B2 (Business. General Dlstnst) RP (Resldeneal, Performance DmInct) CV a_ Q Z 2 Q W 0 a 0 Z_ Z Z O J N J _ 0 Z Q Z Z LL Q � � U O p r Q = w Z C1 lY a � z < >) J UJ N W Z M O Z to 0 O Z Z a Q O W iZ o s i ocr Z F 4 Q O W 9I�°WR J UJ 5 O LL R W a` PROFFER 1 3 INSET We Guard Rail ,�• r Guard Rail PROFFER 13 PROFFER 11 �r �J 4y ra4 � �1a t .�►a y ,� Yr` .r i ! .r ��lp PROFFER 08 o 4:, h i PROFFER 1 2 0 r ! l� LL . FAIRFAX PIKE__ IELD AVE_- M v1111111 a�• 0 4 � e Legend �19 Perch �.,undary � yw'• � � Nw 100ROW I.— Feet N.. ProP.•.r t— a 100. Ran 1.— " /// 500 250 0 500 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT ! ` " GREENWAY ENGINEERING REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA LATE 20160630 PROJECTID 3126 DESIGNEDBy UWt 1mh-500lost SCALE `.t' DF�Sws� Legend Portion of TM 650-1-1-95 Subpct to Rezoning Amendment PuDhc Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary QStephens City Town Limits r• Sewer -Water Semce Area (SWSA) Urban Development Area (UDA) -- Water Line Sewer Line �.:, L•1. .-, i Ca " N GiS D.I 1 2016 D•1• VMW wl S— D• C,,— r N FCSA Ja —.1 r. J r \ \per JO \I 17 In. �r tin • T- HAYVENRURST CT- - 2 In u Jam' RIDGEFIELD-AVE Bi FJ s GEE2F Erb E —em RDEN GATE -DR-- r^ INSIDE SWg A 6 UDA aTSIDE S WSA s UDA N � W F— Q c!� Z 0 Q W D d Z U)> U) W > J � � J_ Q I � Z Z W X Z > = O Lu ~ W O w In LJ a U G W ~ Z a N ~ W a w : o a o a a rn �J IZ.J 3 w Z v G (f 0Lu Z U = 0 N o uj B w O Cr O of wLO R Feet 3 0 R 400 0 400 w i 750 •�r ��FYOR I• �'72S. C7� Fq RO Q J RIDGE FIEL-D-AVE Z 03 `100� �� J I 7� (1�0 W Z J ( / W gins ^yo ,�lp Ji GARDEN. GATEDR- CV to Z w Q`k�C z x Q Z P •1 \ . 2 W:? t Z Ur Z y `7e�F�F Jy,Y/el R,Nc w Z %4,r by y'C. _ 2 0 Q r' Z /tea: Ls9an� ✓/ ^ rpp•; WA�EFrELD CT •• \ ' �Y/f Portion of TM 8513-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment I N Q ~ Z W V Public Street Reservation Area Instrument No 160002930 y w N w b Parcel Boundary = w IY 11--- - NAVVENNURSTCT -- - • / a i F Q > • O Stephens City Town Lirtuls in Z LU �P = Pond or Lake � /J = Q O w j0/A Wetlands NWI Z y 1� �1 1DO year Floodplain = OZ N Z K W 4 ' Stream i 7 L O W 'Qy,' i•'S Feet a 5 Foot Intermediate Contours w 0 500 500/Aj 25 Foot Index Contours R w O DM• Sovc• i••0•na Cour'M1 N CMS D•pYYr�M•. idle Or• iFkY iyee FFp San+c• C•rwr IMb /Yrrt. Mm• aovrpvril. V 5 f erg •M WMI• Su..rs NMari WMi•na• �+r••iby I J sr W0215 JW0212 Stephens Run o 4 � BFRr R� oorlBr 4} MAP SCALE 1" = 1000' 500 0 1000 2000 B FEI 4�00 y� S Br Off! O't'a e! SMo For ZONE A Q� P° �cF �yG �e- y h a H� � ° �P�6 PANEL 0330D o .p09O oe t 0 2 FAIRFAX PIKE m FIRM �, ITTMA T GREEN ST 22 FA1RFgX 1%ANNUAL CHANCE oQ. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FLOOD DISCHARGE T �+ GLEC NOAK CONTAINED IN CUL Or � � yK�ry Z FREDERICK COUNTY, WOODTOP IT VIRGINIA L" AND INCORPORATED AREAS B�9"0 J.o� PANEL 330 OF 375 9 NF RAVE N (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CT O� c'CT 8,,� CONTAINS: ZONE X J= = 0000 COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX \,4, Q 3� GA DEN °Q <</F�q� FREDERICK COUNTY 51D(x3 0330 D GAI E DR ,� STEPHENS CITY, TOWN OF 51OD54 0330 D <N 11 Stephens Run zro� G ZONE X F,y�/�yOR/�F B�Hoyor THEATER LANE WAKEFIELD CT �� Netice to user. The Map Number shown belowshouldhould be d w n Inemaporders; the Communit Number sehep OQ the su 6leetacommulnitye used on Insurance appllcatlons 1., MAP NUMBER x g JW0218 o44A, ° 51069CO330D HAYVENHURSTCT z:1 81 EFFECTIVE DATE POy WH LD �, �qNn W0221 CIR 54� SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 W0222 � ZONE A ovy TOWN RUN Federal Emergency Management Agency LANE Qm���2F P�ACeANOPCeNryCN Sheep Run '4200 E m�..a .n oac�r cove a. wmon a me .eo a rererezed nood mw. rc '40p°OinE JOINS PANEL 0350 '4100PnE was a:meted acre F.MIT On.une. n,Ie m.p does not reflect cn.naes mentlmeMe wruon ma, — — made auMepuent to the date on me E tltle dock. For the laty t product lMormabon .bout Natlonal Rood lnaurarce Prcaram flood maps cnwk the FEMA Flood Map Store at www.mac.tema.av+ • Legend Portion of TM 650-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment O: LDMc Street Reservabon Area - Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary OStephens City Town Limits _ NRCS Soils 3C BLAIRTON SILT LOAM. 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES ` 41C WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERY SILT LOAMS, 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES 41 D WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERY SILT LOAMS, 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES - 41E WEIKERT-BERKS CHANNERY SILT LOAMS. 25 TO 65 PERCENT SLOPES �wnnf rir i i,-. — 9B-CLEARBROOK CHANNERY SILT LOAM, 2 TO 7 PERCENT SLOPES —•�\\ IA 3Y i z= \, W L l7 N W F— W Z Q w S g a o Z a S Q J (D Z O S 0 ~ W N Z Nw _ Z C' w a o a _ > a o a N w LU Z n N N 0 O ZLi o y I Y Z O i S O V) Z ~ w O W k O Q w R h cr F F'f t $ LL Q_ U � R 200 200eJ !. 34 1004 Grand View Feet t 'i00 0 800 u., i N. 5—, f -- �r ..,ply. Va CNS DAP✓ 201e 0aia • 34.211111111 Ousrd Kouse --RAYVENRURST-CT---/ �FAIRFAX PIKE o 7J"'— z LINWOOD-CT �', O O Q y�r WOw6 OODSIDE.CIR = MF O 4RkY/ P ID 0� ` 0P / IOGEFIE)D-AVE p0 �P ti C TWIGG-CT w 7ANKWOOq CT Legend Portion of TM 85D.1-1.95 Subject to RezoninV Ameodme�f Pw*c Street Reservation Area Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary OStephens City Town brods t Cemetery ® Rural Landmark Civil War Battlefields Ceder Creek - First Kwnstown •34-IM VVI"4tllonour Mouse First Winchester - Second Kemslown Second Winchester \ Stephenaons Depot Third Winchester N w I- a Q w Q a w Z X (n w D J Q Q = LL z Z U W Z ON O � w � O _ U) • • Evan Wyatt From: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT) <Rhonda. Fun khouser@VDOT. Virginia. gov> on behalf of Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT)<Matthew.Smith 0vdot.virginia.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 1134 AM To: Evan Wyatt Cc: 'John Bishop': Mark Cheran; Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT); Ingram, Lloyd (VDOT) Subject: Southern Hills Phase 2 - VDOT comments to Rezoning We have completed our review of the Southern Hills Phase 2 rezoning application dated June 30, 2016. Our comments are as follows: 1. VDOT recommends that the "Preliminary Matters" section of the proffer statement be updated to reference the existing proffers associated with rezonings #01-01 and #22-06 as they relate to Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138 (the undeveloped 132 commercial parcel north of the site). Proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 relate to the right- of-way dedication, construction phasing and access to future Warrior Drive by the owner / developer of Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138. 2. Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 will be connected to a property covered by an new set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VDOT recommends that proposed proffer A.2 be updated to make the dedication of the 100-foot wide future Warrior Drive right-of-way, as opposed to the reservation, a condition of site plan approval for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 residential development. 3. The 100' wide reservation for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A-141. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Virginia Department of Transportation Matthew. Smith@vdot.virginia.gov 0 • Frederick County Public Schools O... tO ensure all students an excellent education K. Wayne Lee, Jr. LEED AP . Coordinator of Planning and Development . leew@frederick.k12.va.us July 22, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Re: Southern Hills Phase II Rezoning Application Dear Evan: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Southern Hills phase II rezoning application submitted to its on June 30, 2016. We offer the following comment: We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to ►naintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120, even though the development's proposed impact on community facilities has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single-family detached units. Similar to your estimate, we estimate that this development will house 51 students: 14 high school students, 12 middle school students, and 25 elementary school students. In order to properly serve these additional students, Frederick County Public Schools would spend an estimated $591,000 more per year in operating costs (or $4,546 average per unit per year) and an estimated $2,104,000 in one-time capital expenditures (or $16,185 average per unit). You will find, enclosed with this letter, a more detailed assessment of the estimated impact of Hiatt Run on FCPS, including attendance zone information. Please feel free to contact me at Icew(ci)f-cdericic.k 12.va.us or 540-662-3888 x88249 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, K. Wayne Lee, Jr., LEED AP Coordinator of Planning and Development enclosure cc: Dr. David Sovine, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Albert Orndorff, Assistant Superintendent for Administration Mr. John Grubbs, Transportation Director 1415 Amherst Street www.frederick.k12.va.us P.O. Box 3508 Winchester, Virginia 22604-2546 540-662.3889 EA 88249 540.662.4237 fax I- Annual Operational Costs This Development's Impact on FCPS Operational Costs Average Annual Operational Cost Per Unit FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Total Student Annual Budget) Generation Impact $11,584 51 $591.000 $4,546 School Facility Information Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) ,016-17 School Attendance Zone* Bass -Hoover R.E. Aylor Sherando une 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 1,518 .016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 1,400 - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. # - Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. P C, J Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Multifamily Mobile Home/Other Totals Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Southern Hills Phase II July 22, 2016 Student Generation Housing Units# 130 0 0 0 130 School Cost Program Capacity Per Student Cost Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Elementary School Student Generation 25 0 0 0 25 Capital Costs Middle School Student Generation 12 0 0 0 12 High School Student Generation 14 0 0 0 14 Total Student Generation 51 0 0 0 51 Elementary Middle School High School School Cost Cost Cost Total Capital (2016-21 CIP) (2016-21 CIP) (2016-21 CIP) Costs $24,700,000 850 $29,059 25 $726,000 549,500,000 940 552,660 12 $632,000 $91,900,000 1,725 553,275 14 $746,000 $2.104,000 $16,185 0 ���t(Y SANlTgT� y O 0 grmua9w c% FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY Post Office Box 1877 Winchester Virginia 22604-8377 July 14, 2016 Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Rezoning Application Comment Southern Hills, Phase 2 Tax Map Number: 85D-1-1-95 40.36 acres Dear Mr. Wyatt: I'll (540) 868-1061 Tax (540) 868-1429 www.fcsa-water.com Eric It. Lawrence Executive Director Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments on the Southern Hills, Phase 2 rezoning application package, received at FCSA June 30, 2016. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) offers comments limited to the anticipated impact/effect upon the Authority's public water and sanitary sewer system and the demands thereon. The project parcels are in the sewer and water service area (SWSA) and are served by FCSA. Based on the project's location both water and sanitary sewer services are available within a reasonable distance from the site. Sanitary sewer treatment capacity at the wastewater treatment plant is also presently available. It appears the rezoning application is a reduction in the number of residential units that would be permitted on the site, when compared to the existing proffers for the site- this results in reduced demands for FCSA services. The rezoning application also appears to not increase the commercial development opportunities. It is also acknowledged that Phase I of the development is already connected to FCSA for water and sewer services by a pump station sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows from Southern Hills, Phase 2. It is projected that impacts to FCSA will not increase, and may actually decrease as a result in fewer residential units being constructed. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. wn'rEivs 1voRTll 1'r 0 Page 2 RE: Southern Hills, Phase 2 rezoning application Mr. Evan Wyatt July 14, 2016 Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments. Sincerel t Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Executive Director Cc: Candice Perkins, County Planning Department COUNTY of FREDERICK Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: rwillia@co.frederick.va.us August 4, 2016 VIA E-MAIL AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester VA 22602 Re: Rezoning Application — Southern Hills — Phase 2 — Rezoning Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 Dear Evan: You have submitted to Frederick County for review the above -referenced proffer statement (the "Proffer Statement") for the proposed rezoning of Tax Parcel Number 85D-1-1-95 (the "Property"), 40.36± acres, more or less, in the Opequon Magisterial District, from the RP Residential Performance District and the B2 General Business District, both with proffers, to the RP Residential Performance District and the B2 General Business District, both with revised proffers. I have now reviewed the Proffer Statement and it is my opinion that the Proffer Statement would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following comments: • I Ieading — Consistent with the other references in the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the description of the "REZONING" should also reference the B2 portion of the Property. Proffer A2 — The Proffer might best specifically reference the terms of the commitment in the dedication recorded as Instrument Number 160002930, namely that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made prior to March 10, 2105. Also, so as not to cause any confusion regarding enforceability of previous proffer commitments, this proffer might best make some reference to Proffer 10 of the 2007 Proffers. Proffer 10 of the 2007 Proffers provides that no greater than 10% of the 676,885 maximum allowable square footage in the B2 zone on parcel number 85-A-138 107 North Kent Street ° Winchester, Virginia 22601 • Mr. Evan Wyatt August 4, 2016 Page 2 shall be constructed before Warrior Drive is constructed across the Property. Perhaps a sentence might be added to Proffer A2 along the lines of: The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. Proffer D 1 — New state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation that Proffer D 1 satisfies that requirement. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific developr-nent, as my �rnderstan.dir.g that review will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. Sin , Roderic B. Williams County Attorney cc: Candice Perkins, Assistant Director of Planning & Development (via e-mail) • N 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 GREENWAY ENGINEI•RING September 15, 2016 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: Candice Perkins, Deputy Director 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE• Southern Hills - Phase 2 Rezoning — Review Agencies Comment Response Letter Dear Candice: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a comprehensive comment response letter that addresses the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning comments received from the various review agencies. The comprehensive comment response letter is structured to provide for the specific review agency, the date the comment was received, and information pertaining to each review comment. This information is intended to explain how specific comments have been addressed by the rezoning application or advise why the specific comment was not included in the proffered development program for the commercial redevelopment project. Frederick County Fire Marshal — Comment. dated ,July 5, 2016 Rezoning Approved. Frederick County Sanitation Authority — Comment dated July 14, 2016 ❖ The rezoning application results in reduced demands for FCSA services. It is acknowledged that the existing pun1.p station is sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows front Southern Hills Phase 2. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Frederick County Public Schools — Comment dated July 22, 2016 We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to maintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120.00 even though the development's proposed impact on. community facilities has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single- fam.ily detached units and FCPS estitnates that this development will house 51 students (14 Engineers Surveyors Planners Environmental Scientists Laboratory Telephone 540-6624185 Pax 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.com Project 113126V/EAW 0 • high school, 12 middle school and 25 elementary school). FCPS estimates $2,104,000.00 in one-time capital expenditures ($16,185.00 average per unit). A detailed assessment of the estimated impact, including attendance zone information is enclosed. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Public Schools Attributable Impacts. Frederick County Transportation — Comment dated July 22, 2016 The Traffic Impact Analysis should be fine to waive based on the impacts that are being presented. Frederick County Parks & Recreation — Comment dated July 26, 2016 It appears that the proposed inouetary contribution will not sleet current Development Impact Model (DIM) levels. Parks and Recreation. would like to see minimum levels met. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Parks and Recreation Attributable hnpacts. VDOT — Comment dated July 26, 2016 VD07' recont.ntends that the Preliminary Matters section o/ the proffer statement be updated to reference the existing proffers associated with rezonings #01-01 and #22-06 as they relate to the undeveloped B2 corn.mercial parcel north of the site. COMMENT RESPONSE: The undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of the site is not a parcel that is part of the rezoning application as it is owned by another entity. Greenway Engineering will Work With the County Attorney to determine the appropriate revisions (if any) to the proffer statement regarding this matter. Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 will be connected to a property covered by a neiv set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VD07' recommends that proposed proffer A be updated to make the dedication of the 100 foot wide future Warrior Drive right-of-way, as opposed to the reservation, a condition of site plait approval for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 residential development. Project #3126V/EAW 2 COMMENT RESPONSE: A small portion of the 132 commercial area associated with RZ#22- 06 is a component of this project, which was acquired by the Property Owner to ensure that this acreage would be available as a right-of-way reservation for future dedication to Frederick County and/or VDOT should it. be needed in the future. The Owner has ensured that this reservation will be available through year 2105 as demonstrated in Instrument No. 160002930, which is included as information with the rezoning application. Therefore, this instrument provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through March 10, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. The 100' wide reservation for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A- 141. COMMENT RESPONSE: The Owner has prepared a plat and deed that reserves the 100' right-of-way across the portion of Southern Hills — Phase 1. This document, recorded as Instrument No. 160008765 Is consistent With inforI7lation III Instrument No. 160002930 and provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through August 11, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. Frederick County Planning; — Comment dated August 3, 2016 The Southern. Frederick Area Plan. identifies residential density at four units per acre for this site. The proposed density is 3.22 units per acre, which is relatively consistent With the goals o% the Comprehensive Plan. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Based on changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the nionetary contributionaddresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation front FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance zones where this development is located. As well as data front Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriff's Office on their respective service availabilities. COMMENT RESPONSE: The FCPS review comment dated July 22, 2016 includes a School Facility Information Table that identifies the current school attendance zones and their capacities that are specific to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. Project 113126V/EAW 3 COMMENT RESPONSE: A copy of the 2006 Proffer Statement with redline comments has been provided to identify proffer items carried forward, proffer items that have been modified, and proffer items that have been eliminated in conjunction with the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement. ❖ The inhoduction to the proffer sloes u.ot reference the B2 District zoning portion of the property, nor the acreage of the RP District and B2 District portious of the property. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reference both zoning districts and their respective acreages. A Zoning Plat Exhibit dated September 15, 2016 has been prepared that provides the acreage and limits within each zoning district. ❖ An updated Generalized Developtneut Plan is recommended for this application. COMMENT RESPONSE: Greenway Engineering met with the Planning Department and reviewed the draft Subdivision Design Plan that will be submitted subsequent to final rezoning approval. It was agreed that an updated Generalized Development Plan would not be necessary clue to the simplicity of the single-family residential layout. Frederick County Public Works — Comment dated August 4, 2016 • We have no conanaents concerning the proposed rezoning. Frederick County Attorney — Comment dated August 4, 2016 ❖ Con-sisteu.t with the other refereu.ces in the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the descriptionof the "REZONING' should also reference the B2 portion. of the property. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. Section. A2 of the Proffer Stateniela might be best if it specifies that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT provided that such request is made prior to March 10, 2105. Additionally, a sentence advising that the reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001 and revised January 31, 2007 approved as part of RZ #22-06 is recommended to avoid confusion. regarding enforcement of previous proffer conun.itm.ents. Project #3126V/EAW 4 9 E COMMENT RESPONSE: Section A2 of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorncy's comment. ❖ Section DI — new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation that Proffer DI satisfies that requirement. COMMENT RESPONSE: Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Winchester Regional Airport — Comment dated August 11, 2016 ❖ The proposed rezoning should not have an. impact on, operations at the Winchester Regional Airport; however, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from. aircraft. Please advise me if you have any questions regarding the information in this letter. Greenway Engineering will provide a copy of this letter, a copy of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement and a copy of the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 to all applicable review agencies for information. Sincerely, Evan Wyatt, Dire for of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. Cc: Arcadia Communities, LLC Project #3126V/EAW 5 REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA To be completed by Planning Staff: m6 Ui) Pee Amount Paid $ (y Zoning Amendment Number I l- I (p Date Received g 2t f1 (a PC Hearing Date 1 °O l `t (v BOS Hearing Date f t �(: ,t 6 The following informartion shall be providecl by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenuc, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Wincllestel'. 1. Applicant: Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 2. Property Owne►' (if different than above): Name: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Address: 9900 Main Street Suite 500 Fairfax, VA 22031 3. Contact person if other than above: Name: Evan Wyatt Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Telephone: (703) 425-2614 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 4. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number(s): 85D-1-1-95 b. Total acreage to be rezoned: 40.36 +/- Acres (RP District Proffer Revisions) C. Total acreage of the parcel(s) to be rezoned (if the entirety of the parcels) is not being rezoned): 40.36+/- Acres (RP District Proffer Revisions) d. Current Zoning dcslgnatlon(s) and acrcagc(s) in each designation: RP District 37.79 +/- Acres; B2 District 2.56 +/- Acres (Public Street Reservation Area) e. Proposed zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: RP District 37.79 +/- Acres; B2 District 2.56 +/- Acres (Public Street Reservation Area) r. Magisterial District(s): Opequon District 12 • • 5. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location inap I ✓ Agency Comments ( ✓ Plat ✓ Fees _! ✓ Deed to property _� ✓ �_ Impact Analysis Statement _� ✓ �_ Verification of taxes paid _I, ✓ I_ Proffer Statement _i ✓ I_ Plat depicting exact meets and bOUnds for the proposed zoning district _� ✓ (_ Digital copies (p(If's) of all Submitted dOCLlments, snaps and exhibits _I ✓_I_ 6. The Code of Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Deleware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NUMBER USE ZONING Please refer to attached Properly Adjoiner Map Exhibit and Property Adjoiner PIN, Use, and Zoning Information Table 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, Lising road names and I.Oute 111.1mbers): The 40.36 +/- Acre Portion of Tax Map 85D-1-1-95 proposed for rezoning is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) 13 9. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Number of Units Proposed Single Family homes: 130 Townhome: Multi -Family: Non -Residential Lots: Mobile Home: Hotel Rooms: Square Footage of Proposed Uses Office: Service Station: Retail: Manufacturing: Restaurant: Warehouse: Commercial: Other: 10. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s): l,U� wL ICJ Arcadia Communitles, L.L.C. By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., Its Sole Member and Manager Owner(s): By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc, Its Manager By. "-�? �ji�U P F -i i ✓l C�v�U��i UC �'ICSL'( 14 Date: Date: Date: Date: SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 Tax Map Number Owner Mailing Address City & State ZIP Code Acres 85 A 59 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 1000 LOWES BLVD MOORESVILLE, NC 28117 89.36 85 A 138 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 11.86 85D 11 89 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.29 85D 11 90 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 1 1 91 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 851) 1 1 92 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 8SD 11 93 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 8SD 11 94 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 8SD 1 1 95 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE SOO FAIRFAX, VA 22031 40.36 8SD 1 1 95A SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 17.53 8SD 11 958 SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA i 9515011 0.34 ADJOINING PROPERTIES LISTING 0 SOURCE: FREDERICK COUNTY GIS, 2016 DATA SORTED BY TAX MAP NUMBER Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: %%iNNN.fc,,a.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That 1 (We) (Name) Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. (Address) 99M Main Street Suite 500 Fairfax, VA 22031 (Phone) (703) 425-2614 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 160002930 on Page 0001 , and is described as Parcel: 85D Lot: 95 Block: 1 Section: 1 Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway Engineenng, Inc. (Address) '51 W',ndy H'll La-,e W nchester, VA 22602 (Phone) (540) 662.4185 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: X Rezoning (including proffers) Conditional Use Permit X Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) Subdivision Site Plan Variance or Appeal My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this day of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., Its Sole Member and Manager Signature(S) BY: VM Hold in s III, L.L.C., Its Managing Member By: Van Metre- Finance stes, Inc, its ManagerLtk 'I State of Virginia, City/CounTo-wit: 0111wwc st onww I, tide ��(� �Y�c�..rrC� J, a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction certify that the persons who signed to the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this 2--L day of t,_ �: 20 My Commission Expires: u\ o Pbc �J I 0 0 REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA To be completed by Planning Staff Zoning Amendment Number. PC Hearing Date Fee Amount Paid $ Date Received BOS Hearing Date The following information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 2. Property Owner (if different than above): Name: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Address: 9900 Main Street Suite 500 Fairfax, VA 22031 3. Contact person if other than above: Name: Evan Wyatt Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Telephone: (703) 425-2614 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 4. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number(s): 85D-1-1-95 b. Total acreage to be rezoned: 40.36 +/- Acres (RP District Proffer Revisions) C. Total acreage of the parcel(s) to be rezoned (if the entirety of the parcel(s) is not being rezoned): 40.36+/- Acres (RP District Proffer Revisions) d. Current zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: RP District 37.79 +/- Acres; B2 District 2.56 +/- Acres (Public Street Reservation Area) e. Proposed zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: RP District 37.79 +/- Acres; B2 District 2.56 +/- Acres (Public Street Reservation Area) f Magisterial District(s): Opequon District 12 Copy of FEmQw,*3G i Pam, of tx, LJ S. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location map I ✓ Agency Comments ✓ Plat ✓ ;_ Fees ✓ _ Deed to property _I ✓ ;_ Impact Analysis Statement ✓ Verification of taxes paid ✓ ;_ Proffer Statement _, ✓ Plat depicting exact meets and bounds for the proposed zoning district ✓ Digital copies (pdf s) of all submitted documents, maps and exhibits ✓ 6. The Code of Virginia allows us to request frill disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Deleware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NUMBER USE ZONING Please refer to attached Property Adjoiner Map Exhibit and Property Adjoiner PIN, Use, and Zoning Information Table 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based On nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, ltsing road names and i'Olite nUnlbers): The 40.36 +/- Acre Portion of Tax Map 85D-1-1-95 proposed for rezoning is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) 13 C� • 9. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Single Family homes: 130 Non -Residential Lots: Office: Retail: Restaurant: Commercial: 10. Signature: Number of Units Proposed Townhome: Multi -Family: Mobile Home: Hotel Rooms: Square Footage of Proposed Uses Service Station: Manufacturing: Warehouse: Other: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s): ILI( Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., Its Sole Member and Manager Owner(s): By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc, Its Manager (emu P � -V i ✓l G�viC�1� (j.��'�Cs1J� 14 Date: Date: Date: 6) 1 b Date: 85 A 59 85 A 59 Leaend -� Subject Property, TM 8513-1-1-95 Adjoining Property Portion of TM 850-1-1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary OStephens City Town Limits . L.. Sax- Fl~. County. N GiS Dwv — i . ..1 Asir ... 85 A 138 ---HAYVENHURSLCT— 85D 1 1 95A Feet 400 0 400 (V a' w � � to Z Q W W S d 00 1— (Y Z W 2< J d J O Q Z Z a Z_ W Z Z_ = O F N Z W O � cn Q • �J SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 Tax Map Number Owner Mailing Address City & State ZIP Code Acres 85 A 59 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 1000 LOWES BLVD MOORESVILLE, NC 28117 89.86 85 A 138 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 11.86 8SD 11 89 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.29 85D 1 1 90 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 1 1 91 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 1 1 92 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 1 1 93 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 8SD 1 1 94 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 8SD 1 1 95 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 40.36 8SD 11 95A SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 17.53 8SD 1 1 958 SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 0.34 SOURCE: FREDERICK COUNTY GIS, 2016 DATA ADJOINING PROPERTIES LISTING SORTED BY TAX MAP NUMBER Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www.fcva.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. (Phone) (703) 425-2614 (Address) 99W Main Street Suite 500 Fairfax, VA 22031 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 160,002930 on Page 0001 , and is described as Parcel: 85D Lot: 95 Block: 1 Section: 1 Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway Engineering, Inc. (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) ' S1 W ndy H 11 Lake W nchescer, VA 22802 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: X Rezoning (including proffers) Conditional Use Permit A Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) Subdivision Site Plan Variance or Appeal My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this ,,� day of , 20 \ Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., Its Sole Member and Manager Signature(s) By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financi s iates, Inc, Its Manager ., By: �� , �41, C, f - -i ✓I Ll ✓I CA C" (-)'1( State of Virginia, City County of ` p,To-wit: 0110M K � x'l�rNd I, f J, a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction • certify that the person( who signed to the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this day of, 20��. My Commission Expires: 2U\ o be Arcadia Communities, LLC 3265 Frederick County Treasurer DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT INVOICE AMOUNT 6-22-16 062216,/AG2 Rezoning Green Ph 2 L110081 14036.00 CHECK 6-22-16 CHECK 3467 TOTAL> 14036.00 DATE NUMBER PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS THE FACE OF THIS DOCUMENT HAS A COLORED BACKGROUND ON WHITE PAPER • • yttw.� Arcadia Communities• LLC Wells Fargo 9900 Alain Street Leesburg VA zo1�s srh Floor Fairfax. VA 22031 70.3-840-4572 DATE June 22, 2016 Pay: "Fourteen thousand thirty-six dollars and no cents PAY Frederick County Treasurer TO THE ORDER OF 11 -24 1210 CHECK NO AMOUNT 3467 '$14,036.00 \T AN ANGLE TO W --V 110000003467110 1: 1 2 1000 248i:475 2 297549110 0 ►A, • • Witted Page https://taxcs.co.fr4ock.va.us/applications/TR_layTaxes/REDetaii.aspx Frederick County V i Lr}E Ar TitL 7 op Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Deal Estate Ticket Detail Previous 20'16 REAL ESTKIFE Dept/Tickel# RE2016 / 11470001 Frequency 1 supplement/1 0 Name ARCADIA COI.114UNITIES LLC Map// 05D 11 95 Account/1 0045139 Name 2 Bill Date 06; 05/2016 Acreage Address 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 Due Date 06/06/2016 Improvements FAIRFAX VA Desc SOUTHERN, HILLS L95P1 Land Value "Lip 22031 3907 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Current Payment Stalm Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty $165.00 ($165.00) $0.00 $0.00 Land Use Minerals Last Transaction Date 06/02/2016 0.280 $0.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Interest Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 71•ansaclion history Date Type TI ansnctiontt Amount Balance 6/5/2016 Charge 0 $165.00 $165.00 6/2/2016 Principal Paid 74 ($165.00) $0.00 Previous )f 1 6/30/2016 10:01 AM 311titled Page is https:Htaxes.co.10ick.va.us/applications/TR_payTaxes/REDetail.aspx I icdci ict. Hams. Frederick County V i r J 1 i t t Lt LIFE Ar 771E rOP Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Properly Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCarl(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate i icltet Detail Previm 2016 REAL ESTATE Dept/Tickelll RE2016 110610001 Frequency I Supplement]/ 0 Name ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC Mapil 85 A 138 Account// 8025340 Name 2 Bill Date OSIOSJ2016 Acreage Address 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 Due Date 06/06/2016 Improvements FAIRFAX VA Desc 51.92 ACRES Land Value Zip 22031 3907 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Current Payment Shdus Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty $S,100.90 ($5,100.90) $0.00 $0.00 "Pransacliun History Land Use Minerals Last Transaction Date 0610212016 51.920 $153,000.00 $1,547.300.00 $0.00 $0.00 Interest Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 Date Type 'IYansaction9 Amount Balance 6/5/2016 Charge 0 $5,100.90 $5,100.90 6/2/2016 Principal Paid 74 ($5,100.90) $0.00 Prevlous of 1 6/30/2016 10:06 AM AMENDMENT o �ZI�; N 34 Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: October 19, 2016 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: November 9, 2016 - N APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING # 11-16 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 WHEREAS, Rezoning #11-16 of Southern Hills — Phase 2, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to revise the proffers from Rezoning Application 422-06 for 40.36 acres (37.79 acres of Residential Performance and 2.57 acres of General Business zoning) to allow for the construction of up to 130 single- family detached units with the proffers final revision date of October 13, 2016, was considered. The Property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane, and further identified with Property Identification Number 85D-1-1-95 in the Opequon Magisterial District; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on October 19, 2016 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on November 9, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the proffers associated with rezoning #22-06 for 40.36 acres. These amended proffers modify the housing type from single-family attached (townhouse) units to single-family detached units as well as decrease the number of units from 232 to 130 units; decreasing the total units by 102, with a final revision date of October 13, 2016. The ! conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the Applicant and the Property Owner are attached. i -16 PDRes 445 • i -2- This ordinance shall be in effect on the elate of adoption. Passed this 9th day of November, 2016 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Aye Robert A. Hess Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Blaine P. Dunn Aye PDRes #45-16 BOS Res. #037-16 Gary A. Lofton Aye Robert W. Wells Aye Judith McCann -Slaughter \-e A COPY ATTEST .&k X renda G. Garton Frederick County Administrator vtKGINIA: FR3DERICKCOUNTY.SM- This instrument of writing was produced to me on at .3 —56 a rs2 and with certificate ackno%vIedgement thereto annexed was 1ald /miitted to record. Tax imposed by See. 58.1-802 of $ IVY , and 58.1.801 have been paid, if assessable 4�6,�4 I-'j6r--j , Clerk 0 W N 0 • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 -n Revised October 13, 2016 60011546 O W SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 iv SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT ry PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 1 1-16 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres o1' B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of 132, 1usiness General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36± acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95 (here -In after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills — Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: October• 13, 2016 Preliminary Matters PUPSuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick CouIlty Zoning OrdiIance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application #11-16 for the rezoning of a 40.36±-acre parcel from 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with modified proffers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that SnCh rezoning Is not granted, then these proffers shall be Pile 113126wr:AW C� • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Rcvised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Corrununities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument #160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79f acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber- the B2, Business General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to Mal -ell 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewing Family Cemetery lot shall be established via an appropriate easement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said easement. G� C7 C,_) N C,.J File /13126wEAw 0 �J Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Rcvised October 13, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning 1. A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution of $830,630.70 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The Owner proffers to include a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contribution of $830,630.70 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Owner shall cause for the payment of the established monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for each developed single-family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE Owner Signature File #3126v/EAw Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 c� The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, c-0 assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County r� Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered L 1 conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager, -� By: m e . Q Chor d vb,1 Date Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County ofyc.\VQ,�To WIt: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this May of 00bbr-Q, 20\b1„ an -ce�,rde Uh��� My Commission Expires 4 �b T NOTAR1 �7 �cl,. �esane� Mr 00MMSsr.N EXPAEs w�arto� o File #3126V/EAW � F,EALI N%_ REVISE oNS To P�� -rp pahoNSrrR�c>� I'T�r" I S C1"J "1D �p2W tr►stD 1'�t'1K S nM 00 t F 1 IM tPrO D 1?EMS eu to tn,►A I'V--D IN N e peor DA'1ZcrD g I 1 S �1 V PROFFER STATEMENT Southern Hilly .Suhrliviston Rezoning: Rezoning Application No. 22-06. Rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) (90 acres) and B2 Commercial (15.54 acres). Property See Attachment A for Property Identification Nos. (Opequon Magisterial District) Record Owner: Arcadia Development Co.; Arcadia -Southern Hills, L.L.C.; Southern Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. Applicant: Arcadia Development Co. Protect Name: Southern Hills Orit?inal Date of Proffers: June 6, 2001 Revision Date: January 31, 2007 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 ct. seq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional rezoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia shall approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06 for the rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) [90 acres] and B2 Commercial [ 15.54 acres] with revised proffers, development of the subject property shall he done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terns and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever and all proffers currently in effect on the subject property as of the date this document was executed by the applicant shall continue in firll force and effect. These proffers shall be binding on the applicant and its legal successors and assigns. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development he undersigned, who owns the above -described property, hereby voluntarily proffers that if the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia approves the rezoning for the approximately 105 acres, with frontage along Town Run Lane in the Opequon Magisterial District of Frederick County, Virginia from Residential Performance (R-P) to Residential Perfonmance (RP) [90 acres) and B2 Commercial [ 15.54 LuM1P SU� acres], the undersigned will pay to Frederick County at the time a building permit is a plied for and issued the sum of $4,910.00 per residential lot. or, $1015M 1 .0� �711--zit X This monetary proffer provides for $3,581.00 for Frederick County Schools; $598.00 for Frederick Countv Parks and Recreation; $446.00 for Frederick County Fire and Rescue; j +' 910 46 $105.00 for Public Library; $59.00 for Sheriff's Officc and $121.00 for Administration Building. No GDP Should the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06, then in such event development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the attached voluntarily -proffered revised Generalized Development Plan including the following improvements: A t . .�---( 1.') On the 90 acres to be zoned RP no more than 88 single-family detached urban �.! residence units and no more than 232 townhouse units shall be constructed. The 1=j0 5FD balance of the property zoned 132 commercial shall be developed in accordance with the uses specified in the B2 commercial zoning district. The development of the public street network shall be in general conformance with the revised Generalized Development Plan datcc Octo')er, 2006. WOLK REM r-"Pl J "Sou M'C'D W,TH PwAsc 1; -r%aR. rt*o&C Rp"Ovab F4Ar1 P9 7, 9>:A MI XStickley Drive (SR 1085) shall be extended as shown to connect with Town Run Lane (SR 1012) during the first phase of development (A to B), Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall he ovcrlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface from B to C. Guard rail shall be installed right and left along Town Run Lane "Fill" areas greater than 7' vertical. The improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of tivork. This work shall be done prior to the issuance of the 501" building permit. XTown Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be overlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface front C to D during the phase where the entrance at "D" is constructed. These improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of the work. An easement sliall be established 75' in depth along the South property line E to F. This easement will be prominently shown on the final plat and will restrict construction of homes as well as limiting the clear cutting of trees larger than 4" diameter. [This proffer was fulfilled and recorded on the Southern Hills Subdivision Phase I Final Subdivision Plat, Ltsrrument No.060011588.] • A Z. 1 nST2uwborr I tr 0 00 Zq 30 1 t.0000bi (06 6. A statement shall be added to the plat and covenants for all lots created by this project advising that agricultural uses exist on the South and East, the Ewing Family cemetery exists within the limits of development, and wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of this site. The Ewing Family cemetery will be set aside as a separate lot with public access via an appropriate easemcni(s) and conveyed, if possible, to the Ewing family with covenants for future mauitcnance by the F.wing family. XA contribution of 100,000 for construction funding shall be made at the time VDOT implements the construction of a stoplight at the intersection of Stickley Drive and Rte. 277. [This proffcr was fulfilled on March 3, 2005] � . The Property Owner agrees to dedicate the right-of-way as shown on the revised NO. Generalized Development Plan for the future Warrior Drive extension (the AMb "road") across that portion of the Owner's property zoned B2 Commercial in the location depicted on the Generalized Development Plan. The Property Owner No • agrees to dedicate the right-of-way for the road within ninety (90) days of a pet enll%DC written request by the County, provided that Rezoning Application No. 22-06 has b All h r d' k C' E3 -d f S d 1 b l Foa- too i R'LJ een approve y t e re enc ounty . one o upervtsors an a l applrca e ` t2E13� 2VA�T10� appeal periods have expired and no appeal has been filed. The Owner's dedication of the tight -of -way for :he road is further conditioned on the following: (a) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a NOTE: IN-3fQAWQ4— covenant running with the land, granting the Owner the right, at any time in the future and at Owner's expense, to place underground utilities across, or parallel No. I t;OooZg3o tS to, the dedicated right-of-way for the road (including, but not limited to, gas, PJW�T- of NEB electric, cable, telephone, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterline); (b) the Q£Z)AWCir F*C (iced dedicating the tight -of -way shall contain language, as a covenant running with the land, requiring that the road shall have, at the Owner's discretion, a minimum of two entrances from the north side of Warrior Drive into the Owner's proposed commercial development, which two entrances shall meet applicable twsrlitu►sroa.-T Np. VDOTand County regulations and entrance spacing standards and be engineered 600o ts7VS IS into the design of the road, with turning lanes as required, for the full development of the subject property, during tl:e design phase of the road; and Pet- pOPISE :L requiring that the Owner and/or its designated representative(s) be entitled to DPQ�I St�e.� meaningfully participate in the design of the road as regards the location and design of the two entrances; and (c) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall A4RjM NoT P*'T contain language, as a covenant pinning with the land, granting the Owner, its OtF ��14x- successors and assigns, the right at any times) in the future, to establish and locate construction and/or grading easements over and across the dedicated right- of-way in locations determined by the Owner. its successors and assigns, to be necessary for the developntcnl of the B2 Commercial property and/or the Residential Performance (RP) property provided that, upon construction of the road as a public street accepted into the state highway system by VDOT, the language regarding easements contained in this subparagraph 9 (c) shall thereupon be considered void. pefu CAE TO 10. wrier agrees that no greater than ten percent (10%) of the 676,885 maximum allowable commercial square footage in the 132 zone shall be constructed before C�ZEt%,Et�C,� the portion of the Warrior Drive extension road traversing Owner's property is *r A Z constructed. Owner agrees to limit residential building permits on the Property to a maximum REl�tow.a of seventy-five (75) permits per year, on a calendar basis commencing January 1, 2007, provided however that any unissued (7at otherwise allowable) yearly NO LAB 014 pennits will accumulate to Owner's bunefit (or subsequent years. For example, PeXth�TS pltAP�SQ) if Owner pulls only 50 building, permits in 2007, Owner shall be entitled to 100 permits in 2008; should Owner pall only 50 permits in 2008, Owner shall be entitled to 125 permits in 2009. Residential building permits issues prior to January 1, 2007 are not to be considered a part of this proffer. The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the Applicant and Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants said rezoning and accepts these conditions, the proffered conditions shall supersede all previous proffered conditions applicable to the Property and shall apply to the Property rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully submitted, ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. Property Owner By: /Z✓ Its: --T ARCADIA-SOUTHERN 1111A.S. L.L.C. Prop • , Owner Its: Date: 4It [#I SOU" FERN BILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. ------ Its:j"_Pq4W MA Date: 411107 e PROFFER STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill bane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com GreenwayEngineering i • June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ It I 1-16 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36± acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern I-Iills — Phase 2 Singlc-Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: October 13, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code ol' Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application #11-16 for the rezoning of a 40.36±-acre parcel from 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with modified proffers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be File 113126V/f;AW Oreenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revisal October 13, 2016 deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Conununities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings II1, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument 11160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79± acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewing Family Cemetery lot shall be established via an appropriate easement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said easement. Pile 113126V/EAW • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 C.) Disclosure StateIrient A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution of $830,630.70 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The Owner proffers to include a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contribution of $830,630.70 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Owner shall cause for the payment of the established monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for each developed single-family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE Owner SigIlature File k3126V/GAW Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Revised October 13, 2016 The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager By: `u 11 1p c'c'al d Date Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of TQ'J�Q'\( To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this aday of �CObC 2 20\0hy o,n Tcc'\c\t l ublic My Commission Expires 4- 20 NOTARY PUBLIC MY commiSSION EXPIRES 04/301010 File #3126V/EAW l \ / RIDGE FIEL-DI AVE J W Y O � 64 W z Wo 11 85 A 59 85 A 59 85 A 138 yy � 1` E i Cl. ~,H�y v \ W Z 85D 11,9a w�D CT' FC Q W w e5D 11,93 FVFH`rD a Q \ 850 11,92 D'�'Sp Z w / esD 1 1 91 < J W 85D 11,90 85D 11 95 \(," \ J Q a /9`O 850 1189 CVD 85D 11,958 `rq/�.p Q' Z 0 h w Z Z = O Z W O o � Q 1 V � i 9 p H U 2 85D 11 95A N a Q z W N Lin Z N H _ a > o F a )) 11 Legend -- ---HAYVENHURST CT— -- - N Z W w Z n Subject Property. TM 8513- 1.1-95 Z K N O O a 0 U Adjp—g Property ? w Z Z Z U p Portion of TM 850-1-1-95 Sut3ptl to Rezoning Amendment wr 1 O n 7 O U p Public Street Reservatan Area - Instrument No 160W2930 - O O O w N < a a Parce18oundary nn Feet o Stephens City Town Limns c` 400 0 400 w w y � 4 Map DMa Sows F.aMnot County, w GAS DWWVa 2016 Da Mow Im Saws Lnw CounaFy of FCSA Jsmary 2016 dRI('NhL- 'Z-'AGWA,� -DocumENry-3 R -CLA, Arcadia Communities. LLC 3265 Frederick Countv Treasurer DATE INVOICE NO DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT INVOICE AMOUNT 6-22-16 062216/AG2 Rezoning Green Ph 2 L110081 14036.00 CHECK 6-22-16 CHECK I 3467 TOTAL> 14036.00 DATE NUMBER PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS • .. .• ' ' . ' . . ' . • ' . .• I nC rHUC Ur 1 nIJ UUUUNICIN 1 nHJ H I.ULUnCU GFil.nUnUUINU USN VVnI I C t-HYtrl , • • 'V$inc`..++riA FiLc73�oti.'v,}:. t• .d.7:.>:S':?T�m�. �:� Arcadia Communities, LLC Wells Fargo 9900 Main Street Leesburg. VA 20175 5th Floor 11-24 Fairfax, VA 22031 1210 703-840-4572 DATE CHECK NO. AMOUNT June 22, 2016 3467 *$14,036.00 Pay:*********************** Fourteen thousand thirty-six dollars and no cents 8 PAY Frederick County Treasurer Q� U}(U TO THE ORDER OF • - • • • THE BACK OF THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS AN ARTIFICIAL WATERMARK - HOLD AT AN ANGLE TO W V, . • • • . • • • Cr 000000346?III i:1210002481:475229754911' n L� U Jntitled Page https://taxcs.co.frederirkos/applications/TR_payTaxes/REDetail.aspx Frederick County V I I () I l I I d LIFE nr Tjlr TOF Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous 2016 REAL ESTATE Depaicket// RE2016 111470001 Frequency 1 Supplement/1 0 Natne ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC Map# 05D 11 95 Account/1 0045139 Name 2 Bill Date 06/05/2016 Acreage Address 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 Due Date 06/06/2016 Improvements FAIRFAX VA Dese SOUTHERN, HILLS L95P1 Land Value Zip 22031 3907 Land Use Minemis 0.280 $0.00 $55,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Penally Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Last Transaction Date 06/02/2016 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penally Interest Balance Due $165.00 ($165.00) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 So.00 Transaction History Date Type 'IYansactlontl Amount Balance 6/5/2016 Charge 0 $165.00 $165.00 6/2/2016 Principal Paid 74 ($165.00) $0.00 Previous )f 1 6/30/2016 10:01 AM Jntitled Page 9 https://taxes.co.fredericlois/applications/TR_payTaxes/REDetail.aspx � redcnek I lone Frederick County V ]'I-, I i 11 i Lt t_1FE A rttE rop LD Pay/Lookup Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail PreOOtr, 2016 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticket# RE2016 110610001 Frequency 1 supplement!/ 0 Name ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC Mapfi 85 A 138 Accountdl 8025340 Narne 2 Bill Date 06105/20% Acreage Address 9900 14AIN S'T STE 500 Due Date 06/06/2016 Improvements FAIRFAX VA Desc 5192 ACRES Land Value Zip 22031 3907 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principal Balance Due Penalty $5,100.90 ($5,100.90) $0.00 $0.00 Transaction History Land Use Minerals Last Transaction Date 0510212016 51.920 $153,000.00 $1,547,300.00 $0.00 $0.00 Interest Balance Due $0.00 $0.00 Date Type 'IYansactioulF Anmunt Balance 6/5/2016 Charge 0 $5,100.90 S5,100.90 6/2/2016 Principal Paid 74 ($5,100.90) $0.00 Prc:YiUUS of 1 6/30/2016 10:06 AM 0 0 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) \ G SP 6 �� l `v c, 11, Wyk Q \V'�o p / � o/y �/ ,1 � CEMETERY 5 / RE100 � F rnl�l A4 0p Epp i 10 p N I ER1p�o• i u' I 4100.62' I , / 1 TM 85D-1-1-95 �11� m1iA ZONE RP & B2 1 N � ZONE RP = JZ 7925 ACRES �1 PROPERTY LINE i JI HEREBY CREATED ZONE B2 = 2.5684 ACRES I 1� TOTAL = 40.3609 ACRES h� I ro I RESERVATION FOR 100 FOOT WIDE I , FUTURE ROAD I IRIGHT-OF-WAY 3i o 1 WESTCHESTER DR. j EX. TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC ESMT. I ' I o INST. No. 060011588,,,�, '----,,�ca oI N EX. 20' SANITARY ISEWER ESMT. " EX. 20 DRAINAGE ESMT INST.No. 060011588 I � � INST. No. 060011588 ou N 27'32 43" E 527.10'_-- SEUDNSlSbU RN HILLSSBNP I V-INS. No. 06001f588 100.05' I LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 69'1- 554 63' g1 90 89 I -- 0 93 N 28'49 10" E 801.32-----_-- L5------------- TOWN RUN LANE — STATE RTE. 1012 VARWBLE W/DTH R/W ZONING PLAT EXHIBIT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. (TAX PARC.E- 85D-1-1-95) OPEQUON MG/STERML DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, ORG/NM SCALE: 1 "--200' 1 DATE., SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 �* GREENWAYENGINEERING, iNc. 151 YVincly Hill Lane FND`:9» Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 3126 SHEET 1 of 1 G R E E k WAY rAx.• (540) 722-9528 EXBT 9-15-16 I NGINEERING iviviv.greenwayeng•com 0 u Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36f acres (RP District 37.79f acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills — Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: September 15, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36f-acre parcel from 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79f acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57f acres of B2, Business General District with modified proffers, development of the Property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be File #3126V/EAW i 1 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument #160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79f acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery 1. The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewing Family Cemetery lot shall be established via an appropriate easement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said easement. File H3126WEAW 2 0 • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached residential lots created on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetery exists as a separate lot with access and easement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1,139,120.00 value reflects the monetary contribution that was approved by Frederick County for the 232 townhouse lots entitled on the Property as part of Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner proffers to include a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single- family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contribution of $1,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Owner shall cause for the payment of the established monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot to the County prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for each developed single- family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE File 03126V/EAW 11 0 Greenway Engineering Owner Signature June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager By: Date Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of FAIR FA kI To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this &iday of �. • RA 7x'TJ � .�,� a.'y-& Notary Public My Commission Expires � lWl File 113126V/EAW VICTORIA A. TRACE Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia ##131615 My commission expires Aug. 31. 20144 PROFFER STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com 9 • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 SOUTHERN IIILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with proffers to 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of' 132, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36± acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1- I -95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; I3y: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in after the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills - Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: Tlf-�D September 15, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 1.5.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick COLInty Zoning Ordinance with respect to conclitional Z011lilg, the Undersigned Owner hereby proffers that in the event the Board Ot, Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36±-acre pelt+©n of a� ^- I�ai-ce! 85t-� ) 1 1 95. parcel from the 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with prol'fers to khe 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of' B2, Business General District with modllled proffers, development of' the Property Shall be clone in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that SUCII I-CZOIIiIIg is not granted, then these proffers shall be cleemed withdrawn and have no Idle 113126V/I?AW 9 • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon this Owner and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more partiCUlarly described as the lands owned by Arcadia Co m unities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, as evident by Instrument # 160002930, and further described by Boundary Line Adjustment Plat of the land of Arcadia Coim unities, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions 1. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the Property (approximately 37.79± acres) as single-family detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to encumber the B2, Business General District portion of' the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon reduest by the County or VDOT, provided such reduest is made in writing prior to N/larch 10, 2105, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Prolfcr 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery with access from a I)Ubllc street within the Property. Access From the public street to the Ewing Family Cemetery lot shall be established via an appropriate easement that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said casement. File H3126V/IiAW 2 0 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement I. A Statement Shall be added to the Final SLbdivision Plat and Deed Covenants (m- all single-family detached residential lots created on the Properly advising that agi-iCLdtul-al laIld uses exist to the South and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetel'y exists as a sepal'ate lot with access and easement within the PI-opei-ty; and that wasteWatei' tI-eatment iacllitics exist OI- pl-CViOLISly existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monctai-y COntl-ibUtlOn of $1,139,120.00 to otTset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1,139,120.00 value reflects the monetary contribution that was approved by Frederick County for the 232 townhouse lots entitled on the Properly as part of Rezoning Application #22-06. The Ownel- pi -of te1's to include a nazi-ative oil the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single- family detached 1-esldential lot that egUates to the total monetary coati-ibUti011 Of $1,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. The Ownei- Shall cause IOi- the payment o1 the established monetary COntl'ibUtioll Ioi' each single-lamily detached 1'esidentlal lot to tile COUnty prioi- to the iSSuance of a Certificate 01' Occupancy Permit for each developed single- family detached dwelling unit within the Properly. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE File #3126V/IiAw 3 9 9 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Owner Signature The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the pioff'ei-ed conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other' requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Vli-gliiia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, hic., a Virginia corporation Its Manager By: Coin monweal th of' Virginia, City/County of To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 20_ by My Commissim Expires clay of Notary Public Date File 10126WHAw 4 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 6 11 Pp �, ugh ��°• / / 0/5 cs' CEMETERY o / 0 R�1o568 rn 0 / Of p0 ;, 06 100.62' / 1 TM 85D-1-1-95 �I,I Z�? ZONE RP & B2 II � poi PROPERTY LINE ZONE RP = JZ 7925 ACRES HEREBY CREATED ZONE B2 = 2.5684 ACRES I� N TOTAL = 40.3609 ACRES N;II I I I RESERVATION FOR I 100 FOOT WIDE hJ I FUTURE ROAD 3II IRIGHT—OF—WAY I I �' 0 1 WESTCHESTER DR. ��� 50'R/W Zt EX. TEMPORARY ! I 'Z CUL—DE—SAC ESMT. INST. No. 060011588,,,.,,,,,-- Qo co o I �o EX. . 20' SMIITA Y I� i �1 -- - m EX. 20' I DRAINAGE ESMT. INST. No. 060011588 I INST No. 060011588 w N 2732'43" E 527.1.0'_____.__� I SOU ERN HILLS SUBDMSION P SE I 100.05' � INSr. No. 06001 588 69'1 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 554 63 91 90 89 o 94 93 N 28'49'10" E 801.32------- L5---- -- -------- TOWN RUN LANE — STATE RTE. 1012 VARIABLE WIDTH R/W ZONING PLAT EXHIBIT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, LLC. (iAX PARCEL M—•1-1-95) OPEQUON MGISTERML DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGIN/A SCALE. • 1 "--200' DATE: SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 GREENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. i 151 Windy Flill Lane hND`�97, Winchester, Virginia 22602 telephone: (540) 662-4185 GREEkWAY F,4x- (540) 722-9528 312s SHEET 1 of 1 ENGINEERING ti+ivivgreenwayeng.coil EXBT 9-15-16 u,rom:5406784739 4 r L—J 07/05016 14:11 0218 P.002/003 Rezoning Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept. 1800 Coverstone Drive Attn: Fire Marshal Winchester, Virginia 22602 Public Safety Building (540) 665-6350 1800 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Fare Marshal with his review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, mpact:aial ysfs, and:any., other pei tiuetxtInormation. Applicants Name: Greenway Engineering. Inc. Mailing Address: 151 Windy Flip Lane Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Winchester, VA 22692 Location of property: Located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt. 1012); approximately 0.6 milos south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Rt. 277) Current zoning: RP/62 Zoning requested: RPra2pioBorrevisions Acreage: 40.36+a Fire Marshal's Comments: Fire Marshal's Signature & Da S �� Notice to Fire Marshal - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 22 RECEIVED JUN 3 0 20f �rom:5406784739 Date Received 6/30/2016 • 07/0506 14:11 #218 P.003/003 Frederick County 49� SCANNED Department of Fire and Rescue Office of the Fire Marshal 1080 Coversione Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 665-6350 Fax: (540) 678-4739 Eniai1.fino@fcva.us Plan Review & Comments Plan/Permit Type Rezoning Application 6-30-16 Name Southern Hills - Phase 2 Address Town Run LN Stephens City Project Name Rezoning Application 6-30-16 Applicant Name & Number Greenway Engineering 540-662-4185 RE# Permit Number Emergency Vehicle Access: Adequate Inadequate -NA Hydrant Location: Adequate Inadequate - ! Siamese Location: Adequate Inadequate Fire Lanes Required: Yes No Plan Approval Status Comments Approve Signature: Reviewed By: Kenneth Scott, Jr. Title: Date Reviewed 7/5/2016 VA 22655 • Evan Wyatt From: John Bishop <jbishop®fcva.us> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 3:06 PM To: Evan Wyatt Subject: RE: Project Items Evan, for WWW we have you scheduled for the August 171h planning commission. As far as the TIA questions go both should be fine to waive based on the impacts that are being presented. Thanks John John A. Bishop AICP Assistant Director —Transportation Frederick County Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 540-665-5651 From: Evan Wyatt [mailto:ewyatt@greenwayeng.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 11:41 AM To: John Bishop Subject: Project Items Hi John, I called for you this morning and was advised that you are at the APA Conference through Wednesday. When you get back to the office, I would like to discuss the following projects with you: 1) WWW Rezoning —wanted to make sure if you were CK with the proffer statement and if this has been scheduled for the PC meeting. 2) Southern Hill Phase 2 —wanted to make sure you were amenable to the TIA Waiver request. 3) Mosaic Bible Church - wanted to make sure you were amenable to the TIA Waiver request. Thanks, Evan Evan A. Wyatt I Director of Land Planning 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: 540.662.4185 Phone: 540.974.2701 Fax:540.722.9528 Web: www.GreenwayEng.com Email: ewyatt@greenwayeng.com • • % 151 Windy Hill Lane w Winchester, VA 22602 G;[f'afe; �N, VAfAffi F.NGINFERING June 23, 2016 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: John Bishop, Director of Transportation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: The Greens — Phase 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Waiver Request Dear John, Greenway Engineering has been retained by Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings I11, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (hereinafter "Arcadia Communities") to prepare a Rezoning Application for The Greens Phase 2 (formerly Southern Hills) located on the east side of Town Run Lane in the Opequon Magisterial District. Arcadia Communities recently acquired 40.36± acres of the former Southern Hills Subdivision, which is generally identified as the middle section of the project. Frederick County originally approved Rezoning Application #01-01, which established RP, Residential Performance District zoning over a 105± acre property that includes the 40.36± acre subject property. The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning required the 105± acre property to be developed as single family lots and included several off -site transportation improvements. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained the single family lots within the Phase 1 Land Bay (southern portion of the project), modified the Phase 2 Land Bay to allow for 232 townhouse lots, and established commercial zoning in the Phase 3 Land Bay (northern portion of the project). The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning carried forward the transportation improvements from the original proffers, restricted the Phase 2 Land Bay to townhouse lots, and provided for a 100' right-of-way area between the townhouse land bay and the commercial land bay to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. The 40.36± acre subject property owned by Arcadia Communities is inclusive of the Phase 2 Land Bay approved for 232 townhouse lots; as well as the 100' right-of-way area to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive. Arcadia Communities has reserved the 100' right-of- way area for future public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT. Arcadia Communities intends to submit a new rezoning application that maintains the existing zoning classification of the 40.36± acre subject property and revises the proffer statement to eliminate the 232 townhouse lots and provide for a maximum of 130 single family lots. Project#3126V/GAW Engineers Surveyors Flannels environmental Scientists Labortt°ry 6-23-16 Telephone 5,10-662-4185 Pay; 540-722-9528 www.greenwayeng.coIn Greenway Engineering is requesting that you allow for the waiver of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed rezoning application based on the following: ➢ The approved 232 townhouse lots result in an average of 1,740 VPD (7.5 trips/unit). ➢ The proposed 130 single family lots result in an average of 1,235 VPD (9.5 trips/unit). ➢ The proposed rezoning application results in a reduction of 505 VPD. ➢ The proffered improvements for Stickley Drive (Route 1085) and Town Run Lane (Route 1012) have been performed. ➢ The proffered traffic signalization improvement at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive has been performed. ➢ The future 100' right-of-way corridor for the extension of South Warrior Drive has been reserved for public street dedication in favor of Frederick County and VDOT. Please find attached The Greens — Phase 2 Rezoning Amendment Aerial Overview Exhibit dated June 10, 2016 that identifies the 40.36± acre subject property owned by Arcadia Communities; an Aerial Exhibit of the entire project area and surrounding road network that identifies the transportation improvements that have been performed (the Proffer # coincides with the County approved proffer statement); and Instrument #160002930 that provides the deed and plat for the Arcadia Communities property. Please note that page 4 of the deed provides information for the public street reservation area. Please review this information and contact me if you have any questions. If not, I would request your determination for waiver of the TIA at your earliest possible convenience. Sincerely, C) Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. Cc: Derek DiDonato, Director of Engineering Van Metre I-lomes Project #3126V/GAW 2 6-23-16 9 • Rezoning Comments Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation County Administration Bldg., 2nri Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Parks & Recreation with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22692 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Location of property: Located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt. 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Rt. 277) CUrrent Zoning: RP/B2 Zoning recluested: RP/132proffer revisions Acreage: 40.36+/- Department of Parks & Recreation Comments: A- �'\r✓ n�y��C1TfUv� i13r�( �`tEi A. Ir.9 [ iJ 0 iw u,,y,4- (ym /a/, 4 /od Q I ��l (llil� 1�,-t,t l DiLti{ ,� CJv�r I��(���'� 1 l o/ x (t J r"y c�qPks. & Rec. Signature & Date: i Notice, to Department of Pa ` s & Recreation - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 23 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 August 3, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Proposed Rezoning for Southern Hills — Phase Il Property Identification Number (PIN): 85D-1-1-95 Dear Evan: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Southern Hills — Phase 1I property. This application seeks to rezone 40.36 acres fi-om RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP Districts with revised proffers. Staff s review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Southern Frederick Area Plan. The site is within the limits of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis is shown at 3.22 units per acre. While slightly lower than shown within the plan, the density is relatively consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Monetary Contribution. Based on the changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the monetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation from FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance zones where this development is located, as well as data from Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriffs Office on their respective service availabilities. Model figures for General Government and the Library are still appropriate. 3. Redline Proffers. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. 4. Proffer Statement. The introduction to the proffer does not reference the B2 zoning nor the acreage of B2/RP. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. Page 2 Mr. Evan Wyatt RE: Southern Hills August 3, 2016 5. Generalized Development Plan. This rezoning appears to omit the proffered generalized development plan that was proffered with the 2006 amendment. An updated GDP is recommended for this application that shows the property, proposed interparcel connections, road layout and the ROW dedication from proffer A2. 6. Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. 7. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the County Attorney and the Frederick-Wincliester Service Authority. 8. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA Assistant Director CEP/pd 0 Rezoning Comments; Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Frederick County Debt. of Public Works Attn: Director of Higineerinl; 107 Nur(li Kwit Slrcel Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5643 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Dept. of Public Works Aun: Director of Enbint.rring County Administration Bldg., Suite 202 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public,WOrks with their, review. Attach a caliy -of your applicatioi form, ]oczttiow.map, proffer 0340menta itupaci mn' Alysis, Mind aiay other:0'ertinrat inturmatiun. Applicant's Nnmc; Ureenway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 151 windy Hill Lano Telephone.: (540) 662-41DS hukfax Pike (RI.:tl!) w (.- � t� w hucatud cm thst tAle, of I mm Run I.Eme }HL 101 i_cicFiticm of ]property: u ea � —_ __.--_-__-- apprnxImate'y 0.6 mltns smith of the lntarsertlnn with Pairbx Piko (Rt. 277) Current zoniniu: RP1ti2 Zoning requested: RPIV2prover rov'swns Acreage: 403G+i- Department of Public Work's Comments: 1 � ,f� Public Works 5igmilurc. & Dole: ,` --- i'1�" < .: 1901k, Notice to Dept. of Public Work-, Icasc Itetin n 'l'hi5 i+'aI na t0 the Ap]lI1CAllt 21 Rezoning Comments Winchester Regional Airport Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road 491 Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662-2422 W Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) inchester, Virginia Applicant: Please C11 out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Nanie: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Telephone: 540-662-4185 Winchester, VA 22602 Location of property: Located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Rt 277) Current Roiling: RP/132 Zoning requested: RP/B2profferrevislons Acreage: 40.36 1/-Ac Winchester Regional Airport's Comments: The proposed rezoning has been reviewed and it appears t at it s ou not ave an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside ot the airpor s ose in Part 77 sur ace. However the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from aircra--. f D,git.dly signed 6y Svr W-d Winchester Regional Airports WN Sercnil&—LA VA.6h1111Regi.-IAUpo,tAullwdiy, Serena Manuel QQ�� ou=Alipan, emA=ofvmanueIC.< caslnet,c=US Sfgnatute & Date. DM,20160&110920110400' Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - Please Return Form to Applicant 30 t ! • 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 GREENWAY ENGINEERING September 15, 2016 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: Candice Perkins, Deputy Director 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Southern Hills - Phase 2 Rezoning — Review Agencies Comment Response Letter Dear Candice: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a comprehensive comment response letter that addresses the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning comments received from the various review agencies. The comprehensive comment response letter is structured to provide for the specific review agency, the date the comment was received, and information pertaining to each review comment. This information is intended to explain how specific comments have been addressed by the rezoning application or advise why the specific comment was not included in the proffered development program for the commercial redevelopment project. Frederick County Fire Marshal — Comment dated July 5, 2016 Rezoning Approved. Frederick County Sanitation Authority — Comment dated July 14, 2016 ❖ The rezoning application results in. reduced demands for FCSA services. It is acknowledged that the existing pump stationn is sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows from. Socthern Hills Phase 2. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Frederick County Public Schools — Comment dated July 22, 2016 We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to maintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120.00 even though the development's proposed impact on community facili.tie.s has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single- family detached units and FCPS estimates that this developnl.ent will house 51 students (14 Engineei:s Surveyors Planners laivironmenud Scientists Laboratory Telephone 5,10-662-4185 Pax 540-722-9525 www.grecnwayeng.com Project #3126WLAW 0 • high school, 12 middle school and 25 elementary school). FCPS estimates $2,104,000.00 in one-time capital expenditures ($16,185.00 average per nnnit). A detailed assessment of the estimated impact, including attendance zone information is enclosed. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Public Schools Attributable Impacts. Frederick County Transportation — Comment dated July 22, 2016 ❖ The Traffic Impact Analysis should be fine to waive based on the impacts that are being presented. Frederick County Parks & Recreation — Comment dated July 26, 2016 ❖ It appears that the proposed monetary contribution will not meet current Development Impact Model (DIM) levels. Parks and Recreation would like to see nain.iniunt levels met. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable hnpacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Parks and Recreation Attributable Impacts. VDOT — Comment dated July 26, 2016 VDOT r ecorrunends that the Prelinririar.y Matters section of the proffer statement be updated to reference the existing proffers associated with rezonings #01-01 and #22-06 as they relate to the undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of the site. COMMENT RESPONSE: The undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of the site is not a parcel that is part of the rezoning application as it is owned by another entity. Greenway Engineering will work with the County Attorney to determine the appropriate revisions (if any) to the proffer statement regarding this matter. Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 will be connected to a property covered by a neiv set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VDOT recom.rnends that proposed proffer A2 be updated to make the dedication of the 100 foot wide frture Warrior Drive right-of-way, as opposed to the reservation, a condition of site plan. approval for the Southern. Hills — Phase 2 residential development. Project 4i3126V/EAW 2 0 • COMMENT RESPONSE: A small portion of the 132 commercial area associated with RZ#22- 06 is a component of this project, which was acquired by the Property Owner to ensure that this acreage would be available as a right-of-way reservation for future dedication to Frederick County and/or VDOT should it be needed in the future. The Owner has ensured that this reservation will be available through year 2105 as demonstrated in Instrument No. 160002930, which is included as information with the rezoning application. Therefore, this instrument provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through March 10, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. The 100' wide reservation. for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A- 141. COMMENT RESPONSE: The Owner has prepared a plat and deed that reserves the 100' right-of-way across the portion of Southern Hills — Phase 1. This document, recorded as Instrument No. 160008765 is consistent with information in Instrument No. 160002930 and provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through August 11, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. Frederick County Planning — Comment dated August 3, 2016 The Southern Frederick Area Plann identifies residential density at four units per acre for this site. The proposed density is 3.22 units her acre, which is relatively consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Based on changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the monetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation from. FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance zones where this development is located. As well as data fi-om. Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriff's Office ontheir respective service availabilities. COMMENT RESPONSE: The FCPS review comment dated July 22, 2016 includes a School Facility Information Table that identifies the Current school attendance zones and their capacities that are specific to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts DOCUment dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. Project 113126V/GAW 3 COMMENT RESPONSE: A copy of the 2006 Proffer Statement with redline comments has been provided to identify proffer items carried forward, proffer items that have been modified, and proffer items that have been eliminated in conjunction with the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement. ❖ The introduction to the prof%er does n.ot reference the B2 District zoning portion of the property, nor the acreage of the RP District and B2 District portions of the property. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of'each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reference both zoning districts and their respective acreages. A Zoning Plat Exhibit dated September 15, 2016 has been prepared that provides the acreage and limits within each zoning district. ❖ An updated Generalized Developm.en.t Plan. is recommended for this application. COMMENT RESPONSE: Greenway Engineering met with the Planning Department and reviewed the draft Subdivision Design Plan that will be submitted subsequent to final rezoning approval. It was agreed that in updated Generalized Development Plan would not be necessary due to the simplicity of the single-family residential layout. Frederick County Public Works — Comment dated August 4, 2016 ❖ We have no comments concerning the proposed rezoning. Frederick County Attorney — Comment dated August 4, 2016 Consistent with the other references in the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the description. of the "REZONING" should also reference the B2 portion of the property. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. Section A2 of the Proffer Statement might be best if'it specifies that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-wa>> upon.. request by the Count), or VDOT provided that such request is made prior to Mauch 10, 2105. Additionally, a sentence advising that the reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated .Tune 6, 2001 and revised January 31, 2007 approved as part of RZ #22-06 is recommended to avoid confusion regarding e11f0/"Cen1.e/1.l Of p/"eVIOUS prof com.m.ltinents. Project #3126V/EA W 4 COMMENT RESPONSE: Section A2 of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. ❖ Section DI — new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation. that Proffer D1 satisfies that requirement. COMMENT RESPONSE: Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Winchester Regional Airport — Comment dated August 11, 2016 The proposed rezoning should not have an impact onoperations at the Winchester Regional Airport; however, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from. aircraft. Please advise me if you have any questions regarding the Information in this letter. Greenway Engineering will provide a copy of this letter, a copy of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement and a copy of the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated .September 15, 2016 to all applicable review agencies for information. Sincerely, Evan Wyatt, Dire for of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. Cc: Arcadia Communities, LLC Project tt3126V/EAW 5 Fro m:5406784739 . 005/2016 14:11 0218 P.002/003 t Rezoning Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept. 1800 Coverstone Drive Attn: Fire Marshal Winchester, Virginia 22602 Public Safety Building (540) 665-6350 1800 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Fire Marshal with his review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, imp>ct::analys�is, and;ariy., other. perliueiit- nisormation. Applicant's Nalne: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Winchester, VA 22692 Location ol' property: Located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt. 1012); approximately 0,6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Rt. 277) Current Zoning: RP/132 Zoning re(illested: RPM proffer revisions Acreage: 40.36-'/- Fire Marshal's Comments: Fire Marshal's Signature & Da Notice to Fire Marshal - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 22 1 RECEIVED JUN 3 0 20f =Tom:5406784739 Date Received 6/30/2016 • 0ID5/2016 14:11 0218 P.003/003 Frederick County 49) SCANNED Department of Fire and Rescue Office of the Fire Marshal 1080 Coverslone Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 665-6350 Fax: (540) 678-4739 Diiai1.-fiiio@fcva.us Plan Review & Comments Plan/Permit Type Rezoning Application 6-30-16 Name Southern Hills - Phase 2 Address Town Run LN Stephens City Project Name Rezoning Application 6-30-16 Applicant Name & Number Greenway Engineering 540-662-4185 RE## Permit Number Emergency Vehicle Access Hydrant Location: Siamese Location: Fire Lanes Required: Plan Approval Status Comments Signature: Reviewed By: Kenneth Scott, Jr. Title: 1, Adequate Inadequate '-WA Adequate Inadequate -NM-�) Adequate Inadequate �R7 Yes No Approve Date Reviewed 7/5/2016 VA 22655 i Y 9ANlTgr�O � a �9 ArYmous �? FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY Post Oftice Box 1877 P11 (540) 868-1061 Eric R. Lawrence Winchester Virginia 22604-8377 fox (540) 868-1429 Executive Director wwry.fcsa-water.com July 14, 2016 Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Rezoning Application Comment Southern Hills, Phase 2 Tax Map Number: 85D-1-1-95 40.36 acres Dear Mr. Wyatt: Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments on the Southern Hills, Phase 2 rezoning application package, received at FCSA June 30, 2016. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) offers comments limited to the anticipated impact/effect upon the Authority's public water and sanitary sewer system and the demands thereon. The project parcels are in the sewer and water service area (SWSA) and are served by FCSA. Based on the project's location both water and sanitary sewer services are available within a reasonable distance from the site. Sanitary sewer treatment capacity at the wastewater treatment plant is also presently available. It appears the rezoning application is a reduction in the number of residential units that would be permitted on the site, when compared to the existing proffers for the site- this results in reduced demands for FCSA services. The rezoning application also appears to not increase the commercial development opportunities. It is also acknowledged that Phase I of the development is already connected to FCSA for water and sewer services by a pump station sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows from Southern Hills, Phase 2. It is projected that impacts to FCSA will not increase, and may actually decrease as a result in fewer residential units being constructed. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. 1VATEws WORTii 1T 0 0 Page 2 RE: Southern Hills, Phase 2 rezoning application Mr. Evan Wyatt July 14, 2016 Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments. Sincerel t Eric R. Lawrence, AICP Executive Director Cc: Candice Perkins, County Planning Department Frederick County Public Schools ... to ensure all students an excellent education K. Wayne Lee, Jr. LEED AP . Coordinator of Planning and Development . leevr@frederick.kl2.vams July 22, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Grcenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Re: Southern Hills Phase I1 Rezoning Application Dear Evan: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Southern Hills phase II rezoning application submitted to us on June 30, 2016. We offer the following conmicnt: We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to maintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120, even though the development's proposed impact on community facilities has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single-family detached units. Similar to your estimate, we estimate that this dcvclopmcnt will house 51 students: 14 high school students, 12 middle school students, and 25 elementary school students. In order to properly serve these additional students, Frederick County Public Schools would spend an estimated $591,000 Vlore per year in operating costs (or $4,546 average per unit per year) and an estimated $2,104,000 in one-time capital expenditures (or $16,185 average per unit). You will find, enclosed with this letter, a more detailed assessment of the estimated impact of Hiatt Run on FCPS, including attendance zone information. Please feel free to contact me at lcew(i0-cdericic.k 12.va.us or 540-662-3888 x88249 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, K. Wayne Lee, Jr., LEED AP Coordinator of Planning and Development enclosure cc: Dr. David Sovine, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Albert Orndorff, Assistant Superintendent for Administration Mr. John Grubbs,'fransportation Director 1415 Amherst Street www.frederick.kl2.va.us 540.662.3889 EA. 88249 P.O. Box 3508 540.662.4237 fax Winchester, Virginia 22604.2546 0 9 Annual ODerational Costs (This Development's Impact on FCPS Operational Costs Average Annual Operational Cost Per Unit FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Budget) S11,584 School Facilitv Information Total Student Annual Generation Impact 51 $591,000 Elementary School (Grades Middle School K-5) (Grades 6-8) 2016-17 School Attendance Zone' Bass -Hoover R.E. Aylor June 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 2016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. High School (Grades 9-12) Sherando 1,518 1,400 • • Project Name: Assessment Date: Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Southern Hills Phase II July 22, 2016 Student Generation Elementary Middle School High School School Student Student Student Total Student Housing Type Housing Units# Generation Generation Generation Generation Single -Family Detached 130 25 12 14 51 Single -Family Attached 0 0 0 0 0 Multifamily 0 0 0 0 0 Mobile Home/Other 0 0 0 0 0 Totals 130 25 12 14 51 Capital Costs Elementary Middle School High School zn School Cost Cost Cost (2016-21 CIP) (2016-21 CIP) (2016-21 CIP) School Cost S24,700,000 549,500,000 S91,900,000 Program Capacity 850 940 1,725 Per Student Cost S29,059 552,660 $53,275 Students Generated by this Development 25 12 14 This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs $726,000 $632,000 $746,000 Average Capital Cost Per Unit Total Capital Costs $2,104,000 516,185 Evan Wyatt From: John Bishop <jbishop@fcva.us> Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 3:06 PM To: Evan Wyatt Subject: RE: Project Items Evan, for WWW we have you scheduled for the August 171h planning commission. As far as the TIA questions go both should be fine to waive based on the impacts that are being presented. Thanks John John A. Bishop AICP Assistant Director —Transportation Frederick County Planning and Development 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 540-665-5651 From: Evan Wyatt [mailto:ewyatt@greenwayeng.com] Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 11:41 AM To: John Bishop Subject: Project Items Hi John, I called for you this morning and was advised that you are at the APA Conference through Wednesday. When you get back to the office, I would like to discuss the following projects with you: 1) WWW Rezoning — wanted to make sure if you were OK with the proffer statement and if this has been scheduled for the PC meeting. 2) Southern Hill Phase 2 — wanted to make sure you were amenable to the TIA Waiver request. 3) Mosaic Bible Church - wanted to make sure you were amenable to the TIA Waiver request. Thanks, Evan Evan A. Wyatt I Director of Land Planning 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone: 540.662.4185 Phone: 540.974.2701 Fax: 540.722.9528 Web: www.GreenwayEng.com Email: ewyatt@greenwayeng.com L 151 Windy Hill Lane CIG Winchester, VA 22602 �c11F.,f��.�t���AfA fr F.NGINERR ING June 23, 2016 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: John Bishop, Director of Transportation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: The Greens — Phase 2 Traffic Impact Analysis Waiver Request Dear John, Greenway Engineering has been retained by Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings II1, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (hereinafter "Arcadia Communities") to prepare a Rezoning Application for The Greens Phase 2 (formerly Southern Hills) located on the east side of Town Run Lane in the Opequon Magisterial District. Arcadia Communities recently acquired 40.36± acres of the former Southern Hills Subdivision, which is generally identified as the middle section of the project. Frederick County originally approved Rezoning Application #01-01, which established RP, Residential Performance District zoning over a 105± acre property that includes the 40.36± acre subject property. The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning required the 105± acre property to be developed as single family lots and Included several off -site transportation improvements. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained the single family lots within the Phase 1 Land Bay (southern portion of the project), modified the Phase 2 Land Bay to allow for 232 townhouse lots, and established commercial zoning in the Phase 3 Land Bay (northern portion of the project). The approved Proffer Statement for this rezoning carried forward the transportation improvements from t11e original proffers, restricted the Phase 2 Land Bay to townhouse lots, and provided for a 100' right-of-way area between the townhouse land bay and the commercial land bay to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. The 40.36± acre subject property owned by Arcadia Communities is inclusive of the Phase 2 Land Bay approved for 232 townhouse lots; as well as the 100' right-of-way area to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive. Arcadia Communities has reserved the 100' right-of- way area for future public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT. Arcadia Communities intends to submit a new rezoning application that maintains the existing zoning classification of the 40.36± acre subject property and revises the proffer statement to eliminate the 232 townhouse lots and provide for a maximum of 130 single family lots. Project#3126WEAW Engineers Surveyors 111annei:s [iIMI-onmcnlal Scientists Laboratory 6-23-16 Telephone 540-662-41 b5 Fax 540-722-9528 mm.greenwayeng.coIII Greenway Engineering is requesting that you allow for the waiver of a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the proposed rezoning application based on the following: ➢ The approved 232 townhouse lots result in an average of 1,740 VPD (7.5 trips/unit). ➢ The proposed 130 single family lots result in an average of 1,235 VPD (9.5 trips/unit). ➢ The proposed rezoning application results in a reduction of 505 VPD. ➢ The proffered improvements for Stickley Drive (Route 1085) and Town Run Lane (Route 1012) have been performed. ➢ The proffered traffic signalization improvement at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive has been performed. ➢ The future 100' right-of-way corridor for the extension of South Warrior Drive has been reserved for public street dedication in favor of Frederick County and VDOT. Please find attached The Greens — Phase 2 Rezoning Amendment Aerial Overview Exhibit dated June 10, 2016 that identifies the 40.36± acre subject property owned by Arcadia Communities; an Aerial Exhibit of the entire project area and Surrounding road network that identifies the transportation improvements that have been performed (the Proffer # coincides with the County approved proffer statement); and Instrument #160002930 that provides the deed and plat for the Arcadia Communities property. Please note that page 4 of the deed provides information for the public street reservation area. Please review this information and contact me if you have any questions. If not, I would request your determination for waiver of the TIA at your earliest possible convenience. Sincerely, (MIS Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. Cc: Derek DiDonato, Director of Engineering Van Metre Homes Project #3126V/GAW 2 6-23-16 r] • Rezoning Comments Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation County Administration Bldg., 2nrt Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Parks & Recreation with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. W ............. .� Applicants Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Winchester, VA 22692 Location of property: Located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt. 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the Intersection with Fairfax Pike (Rt. 277) CUITent Zoning: RP/B2 Zoning rcgUCStCd: RP/82 proffer revisions ACrcagc: 40.36+/- Department of Parks & Recreation Comments: 'J6L-i�/.>'C'> �f ` � Q.� L��Vi (1C �c�.�'l 4�A/) ��•.�.N� G(,!✓�i-Cil�t1 CiV\ c ll(1 Acj , uy, , e,T ��L!(3 to f' t 2)y o 4, (Vin na (-- L(/yl G � � �li (_ � 1 �`f,, 4 U f�iC,Li=,� !�✓vtc'� I�Lb�'��'f-Irn-. fzJr^v�7t �!(�.,e 7L S�;E� iM,fniv}�wvi � /L��S uLcy 1� b Zr'u' ((a Pks. & Rec. Si >Ilatlll'C &Date: LL Notice, to Department of Pa 4 s & Recreation -Please Return This Form to the Applicant 23 Evan Wvatt From: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT) <Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT. Virginia. gov> on behalf of Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT) <Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 11:34 AM To: Evan Wyatt Cc: 'John Bishop'; Mark Cheran; Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT); Ingram, Lloyd (VDOT) Subject: Southern Hills Phase 2 - VDOT comments to Rezoning We have completed our review of the Southern Hills Phase 2 rezoning application dated June 30, 2016. Our comments are as follows: 1. VDOT recommends that the "Preliminary Matters" section of the proffer statement be updated to reference the existing proffers associated with rezonings 401-01 and #22-06 as they relate to Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138 (the undeveloped 62 commercial parcel north of the site). Proffers 49 and 410 of rezoning #22-06 relate to the right- of-way dedication, construction phasing and access to future Warrior Drive by the owner / developer of Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138. Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning ##22-06 will be connected to a property covered by an new set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VDOT recommends that proposed proffer A.2 be updated to make the dedication of the 100-foot wide future Warrior Drive right-of-way, as opposed to the reservation, a condition of site plan approval for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 residential development. 3. The 100' wide reservation for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A-141. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. I Nec� Land Use F_ngmeer Virginia Department of Transportation Clarke, Frederick, Shen�mcloah ,'y V/arren Counlie 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 voice: 540/984-5615 fax: 510/984-5607 e mail: Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 August 3, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Proposed Rezoning for Southern Hills — Phase II Property Identification Number (PIN): 85D-1-1-95 Dear Evan: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Southern Hills — Phase II property. This application seeks to rezone 40.36 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP Districts with revised proffers. Staffs review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Southern Frederick Area Plan. The site is within the limits of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis is shown at 3.22 units per acre. While slightly lower than shown within the plan, the density is relatively consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Monetary Contribution. Based on the changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the monetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation fi-om FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance "zones where this development is located, as well as data from Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriff's Office on their respective service availabilities. Model figures for General Government and the Library are still appropriate. 3. Redline Proffers. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. 4. Proffer Statement. The introduction to the proffer does not reference the B2 zoning nor the acreage of B2/RP. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. Page 2 Mr. Evan Wyatt RE: Southern Hills August 3, 2016 5. Generalized Development Plan. This rezoning appears to omit the proffered generalized development plan that was proffered with the 2006 amendment. An updated GDP is recommended for this application that shows the property, proposed interparcel connections, road layout and the ROW dedication from proffer A2. 6. Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. 7. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 8. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel fi-ee to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA Assistant Director CEP/pd Rezoning Comments Frederick County Dcpartnlent of Public Works Mail to: Frederick County Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of l4nginaering 107 Nor(h Ke.W Strcel Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5643 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Dept. of Public Vlrorks Attn: Dirct tur of Enginccring County Administration Bldg., Suite 202 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant; Please CI1 out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public, Works with their review. Attach a copy ,of your application form, locatiow.map, proffer statements iiupael analysis. and any uoier pertinent information. Appliennt's Nnmc: Umeaway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane 1-01ax Pike (HI, 211) — Tcicphonc: (5,10) 662-4105 Location of property: t.umilud an thv vial :tide of Town FRuri Lane (M. 101Z); apprnximate'y 0,6 mllns south of tho lntarsndlnn with Falrf.:tx Pike (Rt. 277) ` � 1.-� j - 1 • �` 1 CL11-rent Zorting: RPM2 Zoning requested: r,P,vzpfotforrv,:snns ACl'CagC; 'in mi+1- Department of Public Work's Comments: ,1 ' r r _ �e r'1 �r� _ V�SZ �_ 1rn `t S(_� a - - _4 �y_ .li' i fi1 i VI' t . Public Works SiUumure. Notice to Dept. of Public 1Vorkstl lease Return 'Phis Form to the Applicant 21 COUNTY of FREDERICK Roderick B. Williams . County Attorney 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: rwillia@co.frederick.va.us August 4, 2016 VIA E-MAIL AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester VA 22602 Re: Rezoning Application — Southern Hills — Phase 2 — Rezoning Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 Dear Evan: You have submitted to Frederick County for review the above -referenced proffer statement (the "Proffer Statement") for the proposed rezoning of Tax Parcel Number 85D-1-1-95 (the "Property"), 40.36± acres, more or less, in the Opequon Magisterial District, from the RP Residential Performance District and the B2 General Business District, both with proffers, to the RP Residential Performance District and the B2 General Business District, both with revised proffers. I have now reviewed the Proffer Statement and it is my opinion that the Proffer Statement would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following comments: • Heading — Consistent with the other references in the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the description of the "REZONING" should also reference the B2 portion of the Property. Proffer A2 — The Proffer might best specifically reference the terms of the commitment in the dedication recorded as Instrument Number 160002930, namely that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made prior to March 10, 2105. Also, so as not to cause any confusion regarding enforceability of previous proffer commitments, this proffer might best make some reference to Proffer 10 of the 2007 Proffers. Proffer 10 of the 2007 Proffers provides that no greater than 10% of the 676,885 maximum allowable square footage in the 132 zone on parcel number 85-A-138 107 North Kcnt Street o Winchester, Virginia 22601 Mr. Evan Wyatt August 4, 2016 Page 2 shall be constructed before Warrior Drive is constructed across the Property. Perhaps a sentence might be added to Proffer A2 along the lines of: The reservation shall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of Rezoning Number 22-06. Proffer D 1 — New state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation that Proffer D1 satisfies that requirement. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific developrnent, as my anders'tanehng is that Te` iew will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. Sin , Roderic B. Williams County Attorney cc: Candice Perkins, Assistant Director of Planning & Development (via e-mail) Rezoning Comments Winchester Regional Airport Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road 491 Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662-2422 W Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director Airport Road (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) inchester, Virginia - ----- ---- _ - -- - _ -- ---- Applicant: Please G11 out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Greenway Engineering, Inc. Mailing Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Telephone: 540-662-4185 Winchester, VA 22602 Location of property: Located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Rt 1012); approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Rt 277) Current Zoning: RP/132 Zoning requested: RPB2proffer revisions Acreage: 40.36+/-Ac Winchester Regional Airport's Comments: The proposed rezoning has been reviewed and it appears that it should not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the proposed site falls outside ot the airport's Close In Vart 77 sur ace. However the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from aircraft. Winchester Regional Airport's Dipita- il9nrd6y Sarrohi—, l Serena Manuel DN Akpw ,11=. ,.o 0,% r 1-1. U poaAut onry, ou=AllpoU,email=oAvmanuel;.<omcaA ne6 c=US S1gnatUre & Date: D t,: 2016 o9. 110920 n 041W Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - Please Return Form to Applicant 30 19EDU NL 9001S1 ON S TO PaPFr'M, -M V93'g0 STQ0Y - I1EM S CAM �M �pRal l►iL.� � I'Tt"1rlS M op t FI � t I� D 11-EMS tE� M INp�Zt-D t N N E� 2 DA'T1c� cl I S 11 V PROFFER STATEMENT Southern HiM S1thflivision Rezoning: Rezoning Application No. 22-06. Rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) (90 acres) and B2 Commercial (15.54 acres). Property: See Attachment A for Property Identification Nos. (Opequon Magisterial District) Record Owner: Arcadia Development Co.; Arcadia -Southern Hills, L.L.C.; Southern Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. Applicant: Arcadia Development Co. Project Name: Southern Hills Original Date of Proffers: June 6, 2001 Revision Date: January 31, 2007 Preliminary !`Tatters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 ct. scq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional rezoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia shall approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06 for the rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) [90 acres] and 132 Commercial [ 15.54 acres] with revised proffers, development of the subject property shall he done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever and all proffers currently iu effect on the subject property as of the date this document was executed by the applicant shall continue in full force and effect. These proffers shall be binding on the applicant and its legal successors and assigns. • • Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development he undersigned, who owns the above -described property, hereby voluntarily proffers that if the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia approves the rezoning for the approximately 105 acres, with frontage along Town Run Lane in the Di Opequon Magisterial District of Frederick County, Virginia from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Perfoniiwice (RP) [90 acres] and B2 Commercial [ 15.54 �.uMP SU� acres], the undersigned will pay to Frederick County at the time a building permit is LU P U# ' .o gplied for and issued the sum of $4,910.00 per residential lot. or- CZ-6-L-rµ X This monetary proffer provides for $3,581.00 for Frederick County Schools; $598.00 for Frederick County Parks and Recreation; $446.00 for Frederick County Fire and Rescue; 9to .61 $105.00 for Public Library; $59.00 for Sheriffs Office and $121.00 for Administration Building. Should the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06, then in such event development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the attached voluntarily -proffered revised Generalized Development Plan including the following improvements: A t . On the 90 acres to be zoned RP no more than 88 single-family detached urban residence units and no more than 232 townhouse units shall be constructed. The 1130 SFD balance of the property zoned 132 commercial shall he developed in accordance with the uses specified in the B2 commercial zoning district. The development of the public street network shall be in general conformance with the revised Generalized Development Plan datcc Octo)er. 2006. WortK Cam Pt„�K.D � Ir"titCFort,E r REMtw�D 1=R.OrI EASE %Wr w I TN ln*scc l .roezi rbaC PalocFW--, Stickley Drive (SR 1085) shall be extended as shown to connect with Town Run Lane (SR 1012) during the first phase of development (A to B). Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be ovcrlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface from B to C. Guard rail shall be installed right and left along Town Run Lane "fill" areas greater than 7' vertical. The mmprovcments are to be lurther described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of work. This work shall be done prior to the issuance of the 501h building permit. Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be overlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface from C to D during the phase where the cntrdnce at "D" is constructed. These improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of the work. An easement sliall be established 75' in depth along the South property line E to F. This easement will be prominently shown on the final plat and will restrict construction of homes as well as limiting the clear cutting of trees larger than 4" diameter. [This proffer was fulfilled and recorded on the Southern Hills Subdivision Phase I Final Subdivision flat, instrument No.060011588.] gi. A Z. 1 i4STQUW4gn- 1(. O 0O Z9 30 1 N STQ,rJ" car 1(00004bl (05 6. A statement shall be added to the plat and covenants for all lots created by this project advising that agricultural uses exist on the South and East, the Ewing Family cemetery exists within the limits of development, and wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of this site. The F.xving Family cemetery will be set aside as a separate lot with public access via an appropriate easemcnt(s) and conveyed, if possible, to the Ewing family with covenants for future mauitenance by the F%%,Ing family. XA contribution of 100,000 for constnrction funding shall be made at the time VDOT implements the construction of a stoplight at the intersection of Stickley Drive and Rte. 277. [This pro.`fcr was fulfilled on March 3, 2005] � . The Property Owner agrees to dedicate the right-of-way as shown on the revised N0. Generalized Development Plan for the future Warrior Drive extension (lire p94D "road") across that portion of the Owner's property zoned B2 Commercial in the location depicted on the Generalized Development Plan. The Property Owner Al0 • agrees to dedicate the right-of-way for the road within ninety (90) days of a pn.&4ioC written request by the County, provided that Rezoning Application No. 22-06 has b db h F d ' kC B -d fS It11 1, bl f�Q lop r Q'� e e e een approve y t rnc ounty oar o upervrsom an a app iea e Q�� appeal periods have expired and no appeal has been filed. The Owner's 3� f>� • dedication of the right-of-way for :lie road is further conditioned on the following: (a) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a NOTE: IN9♦- covenant running with the land, granting the Owner the right, at any time in the future and at Owner's expense, to place underground utilities across, or parallel No. I GOWWR30 IS to, the dedicated right-of-way for the road (including, but not limited to, gas, PAQ*- of Nl.11) electric, cable, telephone, storm sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterline); (b) the R£ZoNtNCW Fee- deed dedicating the night -of -way shall contain language, as a covenant running with the land, requiring that the road shall have, at the Owner's discretion, a - � 56p-1-1 -95; minimum of two entrances from the north side of Warrior Drive into the Owner's proposed commercial development, which tv,•o entrances shall meet applicable I NSTC-01 0ji- wo • VDOT and County regulations and entrance spacing standards and be engineered 16000 t1V's IS into the design of the road, with turning lanes as required, for the full development of the subject property, during tl:e design phase of the road; and t*a- pHgSE :L requiring that the Owner and/or its designated representative(s) be entitled to DA04 13OM►e.� meaningfully participate in the design of the road as regards the location and design of the two entrances; and (c) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall AgA-W NO'lr POST contain language, as a covenant running with the land, granting the Owner, its OF QCZ.L*1 l>r successors and assigns, the right at any time(s) in the future, to establish and locate construction and/or grading easements over and across the dedicated right- of-way in locations determined by the Owner. its successors and assigns, to be necessary for the development of the B2 Commercial property and/or the Residential Performance (RP) property provided that, upon construction of the road as a public street accepted into the state highway system by VDOT, the language regarding easements contained in this subparagraph 9 (c) shall thereupon be considered void. • • p.pfu GA6LC TO TM # bs-q-i38 C JLEF'6 t►4 A Z. REM No C rp 0" 10. wner agrees that no greater than ten percent (10%) of lie 676,885 maximum allowable commercial square footage in the 132 zone shall be constructed before the portion of the Warrior Drive extension road traversing Owner's property is constructed. pex'M 11,5 FWD, -lob Owner agrees to limit residential buildings permits on the Property to a maximum oi'seventy-five (75) permits per year, on a calendar basis commencing January 1, 2007, provided however that any unissued ('nat otltcnvise allowable) yearly permits will accumulate to Owner's benefit for subsequent years. For example, if Owner pulls only 50 building, permits in 2007, Owner shall be entitled to 100 permits in 2008; should Owner pull only 50 permits in 2009, Owner shall be entitled to 125 permits in 2009. Residential building permits issues prior to JanUarV 1, 2007 are not to be considered a part of this proffer. The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the Applicant and Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants said rezoning and accepts these conditions, the proffered conditions shall supersede all previous proffered conditions applicable to the Property and shall apply to the Property rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully submitted, ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. Property Owner By: Its: yre'J( 0c' 4 Date:_ ARCADIA-SOUTHERN HILLS. L.L.C. Prop - , Owner op lts:_-- Date: v 41t Lrl SOU" FERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. y, Its: _ Date: 0187 ' . • Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts 9/15/16 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide information specific to the S011lhel-il Hills -Phase 2 Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 that demonstrates attributable impacts for the proposed 130 single-family detached residential lots. This document provides specific sections that identify residential attributable impacts for transportation, public safety, schools aIld parks and recreation services; as well as the proffered conditions that address these impacts. PROJECT SUMMARY The Southern Hills Subdivision was originally approved by Frederick County in 2001 for 250 single-family dwelling units on 105± acres located on the east side Of Town Run Lane (Route 1012). The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions and monetary contributions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #01-01, which included several Off -site transportation improveillents and a monetary coIltribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained single family lots within Southern Hills -Phase 1 and modified the remainder of the project area to allow for 232 townhouse lots withill Southern Hills —Phase 2 and to allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of the project identified as Southern Hills — Phase 3. The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #22-06, which included the transportation improveillents From Rezoning Application #0I-01, the provision of a 100' right-of- way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay to accommodate the future extension OI- South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation, and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot, totaling $1,139,120.00. Arcadia CornIiiUnities, LLC acquired the Phase I Single -Family Section, the Phase 2 Townhouse Section, and approximately 2.6± acres of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay that is proposed to provide the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. Arcadia Communities, LLC has submitted a Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 for the portion of the Phase 2 Townhouse Land Bay and the 2.6± acre portion of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. This Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 Single -Family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of- the 232 Townhouse lots, provides for the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 and Phase 3 Commercial Land Bays, and provides a $1 , 1 39, 1 20.00 monetary contrlbUtlOil that is consistent with the monetary contribution value for the 232 Townhouse lots approved under Rezoning Application #22-06. Residential Attributable Impacts Document 1 September 15, 2016 TRANSPORTATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed IZezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed attributable impacts to transportation associated With this rezoning request: Existing impacts: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of' 505 VPD The proffered transportation improvements that were identified in IZezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 were determined to be appropriate to mitigate transportation impacts for the Southern Hills Subdivision. The proffered transportation improvements have been performed in advance ofresidential development activities, which include the following: i' Completion of the extension of Stickley Drive (ROLItC 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). Installation of guardrail along Town IZun Lane (IZoute 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. i Completion of new surface material overlay Of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). Recordation of the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to VDOT and/or Frederick County. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of' vehicle trips generated from the proffered single- family lots. The Southern I -tills Subdivision has performed all proffered transportation improvements deemed to be required to mitigate transportation impacts and has provided VDOT and Frederick C011nty With the ability to obtain the 100' right-of-way area for future public street improvements to connect to the proposed Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. These facts demonstrate that the Southern Hills Phase-2 IZezoning Application has addressed attributable impacts specific to the proposed residential development. Residential AttribUtable Impacts Document 2 September 15, 2016 PUBLIC SAFETY — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in-lieu-0f' the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application PrOfler Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 tOW1111011SC lots and provides for a ]maximum Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts f -om residential dCVCI0pI11C11t 101- public safety services IS determined by the number of persons required to serve. The Following information identifies the average number of' persons projected lOr townhouse and single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to public safety associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/hollschOld'1` = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size* = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction Of 197 persons Persons Per Household (PPI-I) ValLIC determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document— Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average 110lISehOld size value of 2.58. ''` '`Average Family Size value detcrlllined from US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) DOCUillellt does not identify Capital projects For the Sheriff's Office, nor does the CIP Document identify capital projects for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, which is the first due company for the Southern Hills —Phase 2 residential lots. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office and for the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County, which amounts to approximately 77% for both the Sherlf f's Office and the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document provides costs attributable t0 Personnel and Operating for both departments. Operating Costs may ilIClllde equipment Costs (bUt are not exCIUS1.vely Cqulpment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides conservative valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $1,207,973.0p x .77 (Local Funds) = $930,139.00 $930,139.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $ I I.18/pers011 $1 1.18 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size)I = $35.10/SFD household $35.10 x 130 SFD = $4,563.67 anlWal im )act $4,563.70 x 10 years* = $45,636.70 Residential Attributable Impacts Document 3 September 15, 2016 VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $834,419.00 x .77 (Local FLInCIS) = $642,502.00 $642,502.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $7.72/person $7.72 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Sire) = $24.24/SFD household $24.24 x 130 SFD = $3,15 l .30 annual impact $3,151.30 x 10 years ; = $31,513.00 '` 10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal COrlstruction schedule ol' 4-5 lots per gLiai ler results in 16-20 lots per year, Which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. CONCLUSION: The SOLllllel'll I-Iills-Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of' residential lots and Will I'CSlllt ill a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The CL11-1-ellt Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) does not identil'y proposed projects that are relevant to the Sheriff's Office alld the SlepI1CI1S City VOILInteer Fire and ResCLle Company, nor does the CIP identify proposed capital projects in which the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application Will have attributable impacts towards. The Frederick COLlnty 2016-2017 AllIlLlal BLldget DOCL1111ei1t provides a basis to determine potential local r'CMILICS t0 171111d Operating Costs for Public Safely Services. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts Ior a per -person value 1'or 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period. This is a conservative valltatioil for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average blind-ollt protection for the 130 single-family lots; as Well as the Complete value Of a1lnUal Operating Costs over the build -out period. PUBLIC SCHOOLS — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Prol'l'er Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maxinlunl 01' 130 single-family detached residential lots. Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) utilizes the following student/household projects for single-family lots and for townhouse lots as a basis for determining impacts t0 I)L1b11C SC11001S: Single -Family Lots: Elementary School = 0.19 students per household Middle School = 0.09 students per household High School = 0.10 students per household Residential Attributable Impacts Document September 15, 2016 i E Townllouse Lots: Elementary School = 0.13 students per household Middle School = 0.07 students per household High School = 0.07 students per household The Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development Will result in a reduction of 6 Elementary School students; 5 MidCIIC School studcntS; and 3 High School students based on projections utilized by FCPS. FCPS provided information that states students Ir0111 the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will attend Bass -Hoover Elementary School, 12obcrt E. Aylor Middle School, and Sherando High School. FCPS projects that there will be 25 Elementary School SLUdents, 12 Middle School Students, and 14 High School StlldCIAS from the 130 single-family lots Within Southern Hills — Phase 2. This Infoi'nlation indicates that there is SLIffiClellt Capacity at Bass -Hoover Elementary School and Robert E. Aylor Middle School t0 accommodate the projected increase ill StLidCIAS from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development; however, this information indicates that the capacity at Sherando High School is already exceeded by 118 students. FCPS has acquired property for a new high school that Will provide for acceptable Capacity For students utiliziIlg the new facility and for Students at Sherando High School once the new facility is Open. FCPS has received funding for design services and anticipates opening the new high school facility in Fall 2019. CONCLUSION: FCPS has provided Capital cost information for the new high school that assumes a price -per -Student multiplier for the school capacity, which totals $53,275.00 per student. FCPS projects that the StUdellt gCllel'at1011 fl'011l the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will result in $746,000.00 o1'capital cost based on the price -per -student multiplier. The Frederick County 2016- 2017 Allnllal BLIdget DOCLI111CI1t pl'OVICICS bLldgCt information for the School Debt Service (page 179), Which acCOLil1tS for all school pro jjectS in the County that have been f lilded through bond revenues. This information does not provide sufficient information to determine attributable impacts to specific schools; therefore, the $746,000.00 projection for the price -per -Student multiplier for the new high school Will be LISCd for this analysis, which Should be Considered very conservative SIIICC StlldClltS f1'0111 the SOUtlICI'll Hills —Phase 2 Development Will 110t LltiliZe the nCW high school facility. PARKS & RECREATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The SOLIlI1Cl'll Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots Within Phase 2 ill-IiCLI-Of the 232 tOW1111OLISC lots CUrrently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maxilllL1111 of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for parks and recreation services is determined by the IILIIllbCl' Of pCl'SOiiS I'eClUil'CCl t0 Serve. The following information Identifies the average Residential Attributable Impacts Document 5 September 15, 2016 number of persons projected for lowi1hOUSe alld single faintly dWellillg Unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to parks and recreation associated With this rezoning regLICSt: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/household"' = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size:': = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed reroning results in a reduction Of 197 persons `Persons Per Household (PPI-I) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCLllllent— Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.59. '` YAverage Family Size value determined front US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - Frederick County 2016-2017 (page 195). The Budget Document identifies that the CIP consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the COUllty fOr the CllSLllllg five years. Additionally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is strictly advisory and that it is possible particular projects may not be funded during the year that it is indicated in the CIP. Finally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the bLlClget is considered the last obstacle before construction. The 2015-2016 CIP DOCLI111CIlt pl'OVIdes a section entitled Project Funding (page 21), which identifies how capital projects are funded For variOLls agencies and divisions. The CIP Document states that f1111C1111g for Parks and Recreation Department pl'OIeCtS Will COille fl'0111 the Unreserved fUnd balance Of the COLlnty. Additionally, the CIP Document advises that the Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private Sources 01' funding for projects not funded by the County. The Parks and Recreation Department identifies $71,648,000.00 in CIP projects that are to be Funded by the County during the 2015-2020 fiscal years. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County Parks and Recreation during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years for Clearbrook Park (page 150) and Sherando Park (page 151). Funding for the two regional parks is achieved primarily from fees charged for use of facilities and from local revenues. Local revenues for Clearbrook Park averaged $143,684.00 during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years, while Sherando Park averaged $267,347.00. The percentage of local revenues to fund Clearbrook Park averaged 36% and Sherando Park averaged 64%, With the remaining ILlIlClllig Coming from fees Charged fol' LISC Of facilities. The Budget Document proviCleS Costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park. Operating Costs may include CCllliplllellt costs (but are not exclusively egLllplllellt); therefore, Operating COSTS IUnCied by local ContribUtiO11S provides valUati0I1 that Can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. It is more than likely that Residential Attributable Impacts DOeLiment 6 September 15, 2016 0 0 residents of the Southern I-Iills—Phase 2 project will utilize Sherando Park based on the proximity of the regional park to this project. However, the residential attributable impacts have been considered for both regional parks for the purpose of' this analysis, which provides conservative valuation for attributable impacts associated with this project. SHERANDO PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $243,123.00 x .64 (Local Funds)'` = $155,598.72 $155,598.72/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.87/person $1.87 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $5.87/SFD household $5.87 x 130 SFD = $763.10 annual impact $763.10 x 10 years'` = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK 13AIZK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $234,843.00 x .36 (Local Funds)`` = $84,543.48 $84,543.48/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.02/person $1.02 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $3.20/SFD household $3.20 x 130 SFD = $416.00 annual impact $416.00 x 10 years* = $4,160.00 '1` 10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per Cluarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. SHERANDO PARK ATTIZ113UTABLE IMPACT = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PAIZK ATTRII3UTA13LE IMPACT = $4,160.00 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACT = $1 1,791.00 CONCLUSION: The SOUthei'11 Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction 01' residential lots and will result in a reClUCtroll of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) DOCLI111e11t does not identify capital projects that were demonstrated for funding during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal year budgets. Additionally, the CIP identifies that funding for Parks and Recreation Department capital projects Will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual BllClget DOCLIMCIlt pr0VldCs a basis t0 determine potential local I-CVElllies to f Urid Operating Costs for the Clearbrook Regional Park and the Sherando Regional Park. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Residential Attributable Impacts Document 7 September 15, 2016 0 0 Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period for both Clearbrook Regional Park and Sherando Regional Park. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build - out projection for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -out period. SOUTHERN HILLS —PHASE 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The information 111 this CI0CLIMCI1t has been developed to determine attributable impacts from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development to demonstrate that the $1 ,139,120.00 monetary Contribution identified in Section D. Monetary Contributions of the June 30, 2016 Proffer Statement is appropriate. The following information is provided from the various sections of this document• Transportation Impacts: NONE (all proffered transportation improvements complete) Public Safety Impacts: $ 77,149.70 Total Public Schools Impacts: $746,000.00 Total Parks & Recreation Impacts: $ 1 1,791.00 Total Total Impacts: Monetary Contribution Attachments $834,940.70 Total $1,139,120.00 Total (+ $304,179.30) Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit 6-30-16 Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables US Census Bureau Household and Families DOC11111C11t Residential Attributable Impacts Document 8 September 15, 2016 0 0 Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit PROFFERS 3 INS Guard Rag Guard no PROFFER 8 PROFFER 1113 Ile FA PROFFER 08 f - PROFFERS 2 C N IELD LLegendPere�eNew _ Feet0� � � ROW L— 500 250 0 500 e SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER GREENWAY REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT OPEQUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA DATE. 2016.0630 PROJECT ID d126 DESIGNED BY OWE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT ENGINEERING SCALE Ifth-500fee 0 • Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts 0 Sheriff Volunteer Fire Departments Ambulance & Rescue Service Public Safety Contributions Juvenile Court Probation Inspections Fire and Rescue Public Safety Communications PUBLIC SAFETY Public Safety 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $11,610,858 $11,644,337 $11,644,337 $402,822 3.58% 987,582 895,305 895,305 52,745 6.26% 395,029 395,200 395,200 0 0.00% 5,302,908 5,513,558 5,513,558 45,633 0.83% 149,981 146,835 146,835 5,055 3.57% 1,122,692 1,151,981 1,151,981 61,964 5.68% 8,266,034 9,829,763 9,829,763 1,957,774 24.87% 1,235,238 1,417,841 1,417,841 57,520 4.23% $29,070,322 $30,994,820 $30,994,820 $2,583,513 9.09% Public Safety Communications 5% Sheriff 37% Fire and Rescue) 32% Inspections Volunteer Fire 4% Departments 3% Juvenile Court) Ambulance & Rescue Probation Public Safety_ Service 0% Contributions 1% 18% County of Frederick, VA 108 FY 2016 - 2017 0 0 SHERIFF 3102 DESCRIPTION: The Frederick County Sheriff's Office is comprised of four divisions: Patrol, Administrative Services, Investigative, and Court Security/Civil Process. 'file Patrol Division is responsible for answering calls for service, initial investigations of criminal complaints, and patrolling the streets and highways for traffic violations. Additionally, each shift is responsible for business checks, serving warrants, responding to alarms, handling Detention Orders, Protective Orders, and preparing cases and presenting evidence in Court. The Traffic Unit is one of the fastest growing units within the Patrol Division. The number of traffic complaints, accident investigations, and citations issued continues to increase as the community continues to grow. Originally the intent for this unit was to supplement the Virginia State Police in handling the number of complaints dealing with traffic. Since the inception of the traffic unit, this office has become the primary agency for dealing with traffic complaints. The traffic unit also handles special traffic complaints reported to the Shcrifrs office and coordinates and establishes special details such as DUI checkpoints and scatbclt safety checkpoints. The Administrative Services Division is responsible for the School Resource Officers and the Animal Control Officers. This division also maintains the Sheriffs Office accreditation and provides community services such as Neighborhood Watch, Project Watch, and Project Lifesaver. The Sheriffs Office Emergency Response Team is also part of the Administrative Services Division. The Investigation Division handles all major felony cases and the more serious and violent misdemeanor cases, in addition to special investigations into drugs, gangs, child pornography, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, white collar crime, computer crimes, and fraud. The Court Security/Civil Process division is responsible for providing security for the Frederick County Courts. This division is also responsible for serving all civil papers within Frederick County and handling prisoner extraditions and prisoner transports. GOALS: • Provide the citizens of Frederick County the best services possible by providing community relations through deputies performing a variety of duties, to include Sheriff's Kid Camp, the D.A.R.E. program, Neighborhood Watch meetings, Project Lifesaver, VIN Etching, Elder Assistance Programs, and Child Fingerprinting. • Continue to upgrade law enforcement equipment with more modem equipment such as TASERS, :Less than Lethal Weapons and other alternatives to deadly force while keeping the safety of our personnel and the public as our it l priority. • Continue working relationships with outside agencies that request our services. • Continue efforts to recruit and hire quality personnel. • Continue to maintain the Virginia Law Enforcement Accreditation Standards. • Provide School Resource Officers (SRO) for as many schools as possible. • Train and utilize a Bloodhound for search and rescue and fugitive location, PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Actual Projected Projected Law Enforcement Calls for Service 71,132 62,722 58,144 # of Warrants Served 7,585 7,640 7,622 # of Criminal Arrests 4,116 3,935 3,879 # of Citations Issued 5,733 4,526 3,797 # of Cases Reported 5,536 6,593 6,436 # of Civil Papers Served 18,694 18,057 17,701 # of Extraditions/Transports 398 448 467 BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2016 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % Costs: Personnel 9,796,034 10,480,064 10,207,584 11,128,561 648,497 6.19% Operating 1,212,599 1,152,948 981,587 1,207,973 55,025 4.77% Capital/Leases 602,225 11,325 647,835 11,429 104 0.92% 12,347,963 703,626 6.04% TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 Revenue: Fees 574,534 447,045 578,347 432,745 -14,300 -3.20% Statc/Federal 2,677,122 2,352,154 2,657,125 2,388,421 36,267 1.54% Local 8,359,202 8,845,138 8,601,534 9,52G 797 681,659 7.71% 12,347,963 703,626 6.04% TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 Full-time Positions 126.5 133.5 133.5 139.5 6 4.49% County of Frederick, VA 110 FY 2016 - 2017 0 s VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS 3202 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this expenditure activity is to provide contributions to the eleven volunteer fire companies which serve Frederick County. The contribution is used by the fire company to support their mission of providing fire protection to the residents of their service area. Each volunteer company provides an annual financial statement to the county as evidence of expenses incurred. The governing body of the county recognizes the invaluable contributions made to the community by our volunteer fire companies. GOALS: • Provide fair and accurate contributions to the county fire departments. BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees State/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Bud let Amount % 73,676 73,676 66,308 73,676 0 0.00% 913,906 821,629 1,031,745 834,419 12,790 1.56% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 908,095 12,790 1.43% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 273,993 220,000 214,535 210,000 -10,000 -4.55% 713,589 675,305 883,518 698,095 22,790 3.37% 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 908,095 12,790 1.43% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA FY 2016 - 2017 Parks & Rec. — Admin. Parks Maintenance Recreation Centers Clearbrook Park Sherando Park Regional Library PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL Sheran 7 Clearbrook 6% Parks, Recreation & Cultural 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $607,026 $1,035,835 $707,341 -$328,494 -31.71% 1,570,785 1,042,120 1,062,790 20,670 1.98% 1,562,265 2,107,290 2,707,142 599,852 28.47% 387,821 434,999 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 434,821 409,482 410,398 916 0.22% 862,665 862,665 942,357 79,692 9.24% $5,425,383 $5,892,391 $6 218 950 $326,559 5.54% Rrainnnl T.ihrary Parks & Rec. - Admin. aintenance 7% County of Frederick, VA 145 FY 2016 - 2017 • • CLEARBROOK PARK 7109 DESCRIPTION: The Clearbrook Park budget contains all the necessary fiends to maintain the 55 acre Clearbrook Park, three Neighborhood parks, two Frederick County Public Schools (FOPS) high schools, two FCPS middle schools, seven FCPS elementary schools, two additional FOPS building grounds, and the Old Frederick County Courthouse lawn. GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees Suite/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % 129,562 154,243 156,576 149,429 -4,814 -3.12% 234,958 280,756 231,683 234,843 -45,913 -16.35% 23,301 0 44,739 4,650 4,650 100.00% 387,821 434,999 432,998 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 212,064 336,100 375,708 232,528 -103,572 -30.82% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 175,757 98,899 57,290 156,394 57,495 58.14% 387,821 434,999 432,998 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 150 FY 2016 - 2017 0 • SHERANDO PARK DESCRIPTION: The Sherando Park budget contains all the necessary finds to maintain the 334 acre Sherando Park and the grounds at one Frederick County Public Schools (FOPS) high school, two FC13S middle schools, five FCPS elementary schools, Frederick County Public Safety Building, and Warrior Drive Right -Of -Way. GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted Actual Budget Budget Budget Costs: Personnel 156,777 160,387 143,376 160,275 Operating 214,053 249,095 144,382 243,123 Capital/Leases 63,991 0 38,721 7,000 410,398 TOTAL 434,821 409,482 326,479 Revenue: Fees 127,887 157,700 177,959 167,072 State/Federal 0 0 0 0 Local 306,934 251,782 148,520 243,326 410,398 TOTAL 434,821 409,482 326,479 Full-time Positions 0 0 0 0 7110 Increase/Decrease FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Amount % -112 -0.07% -5,972 -2.40% 7,000 100.00% 916 0.22% 9,372 5.94% 0 0.00% -8,456 -3.36% 916 0.22% 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 151 FY 2016 - 2017 0 0 Instruction Admin./Attendance & Health Pupil Transportation Operation & Maintenance Facilities Technology School Debt Service Transfers School Nutrition Services School Textbook Private Purpose Funds School Capital Fund NREP Operating Fund NREP Textbook Fund Consolidated Services SCHOOL FUNDS Schools 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $100,338,683 $113,461,369 $116,910,372 $3,449,003 3.04% 5,648,324 6,387,423 6,771,401 383,978 6.01 % 8,275,541 8,698,744 8,767,835 69,091 0.79% 11,862,433 12,842,221 13,423,274 581,053 4.52% 171,708 204,412 206,887 2,475 1.21% 5,638,600 5,965,019 6,565,886 600,867 10.07% 13,999,653 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 425,797 469,739 565,345 95,606 20.35% 4,443,951 6,626,934 6,669,757 42,823 0.65% 906,097 1,900,544 2,666,452 765,908 40.30% 15,308 75,000 75,000 0 0.00% 1,136,445 500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 500.00% 4,290,687 5,259,238 5,346,744 87,506 1.66% 11,644 40,000 50,000 10,000 25.00% 2,898,133 3,600,000 3,600,000 0 0.00% $160,063,004 $181,267,128 1 $191,065,242 $9,798,114 5.41% Private Purpose, 0.0%� NREP, 2.8% School Nutrition Services, \ 3.5% School Textbook, 1.4% f School Debt Service, 8.6% Technology, 3.4% Facilities, 0.1 % 'n 1 Operation & Maint., 7.0% Pupil Transportation, 4.6%, Admin./Attendance & Health, 3.5% Consolidated Services, 1.9% School Capital, 1.6% Transfers, 0.3% Instruction, 61.2% County of Frederick, VA 179 FY2016-2017 SCHOOL DEBT SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Whenever extensive building programs are developed by the school board and loans through bonds and the Virginia Literary Fund are procured, it is necessary to set up a schedule of repayment over a twenty year period. The fiends in this category include principal and interest for Virginia Public School Authority Bonds, Virginia Literary Fund payments and principal and interest for interim financing as required. An additional cost included in this budget are fees for handling bonds and fees charged for investing VPSA bond proceeds. Increased finding from the County Board of Supervisors is required due to scheduled financing repayments on the construction of the replacement Frederick County Middle School. GOALS: • To repay the money borrowed through bond issuance and literary loans over a twenty year period. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Actual Budget Budget Costs: Personnel 0 0 0 Operating 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 Capital/Leases 0 0 TOTAL 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 Revenue: Fees 0 0 0 State/Federal 275,783 337,043 337,043 Local 14,626,151 14,899,442 14,899,442 TOTAL 14,901,934 15,236,485 15,236,485 Full-time Positions 0 0 01 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease Adopted FY 2016App. To FY 2017 Budget Amount % 0 0 0.00% 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0.00% 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0.00% 370,524 33,481 9.93% 16,075,765 1,176,323 7.90% 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 187 FY 2016 - 2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY 2016-2017 The Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local planning commission. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP consists of a separate document that was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 25, 2015. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plan as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan. Frederick County approved the 2030 Comprehensive Plan on July 3, 2011. The Capital Improvements Plan is strictly advisory. It is possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. Transportation projects are included in the CIP. The inclusion of transportation projects to the Cl? is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. Impact of the Capital Program on the Operating Budget: The Capital Program has three direct impacts on the Operating Budget. The primary impact is in the Debt Service accounts. The greatest part of the county's capital improvement costs have been funded through the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, which generally are repaid over a period of twenty years. The only debt of this nature is funding for the construction of schools. The second impact of the Capital Program upon the Operating Budget is in the Cash Capital account. Cash Capital is the appropriation of General Fund monies to fund capital improvement projects. Financing capital projects on a pay-as-you-go basis minimizes the need for issuing bonds and substantially reduces current and future debt service costs. The third and final impact of the CIP on the Operating Budget arises when the CIP project is completed and the county must operate and maintain the new facility. In some instances, the costs re absorbed within the current budget of the department(s) providing the service. In other instances, such as the opening of a new school, direct operating and maintenance costs, as well as increases in the staff must be budgeted on an ongoing basis. The Capital Improvements Plan developed by the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subconunittee is presented on the following page. NOTE: The FY 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan is the most recent Board approved CIP at time of print of this document. The CIP process is currently under review in order to make it more relevant, useful, and accurate. �� County of Frederick, VA 195 FY 2016 - 2017 Frederick County, Virginia Additional Miscellaneous/Demographic Statistics Demographic Profilel Percent Value Frederick County, Virginia Virginia USA Frederick County, Virginia Virginia USA Demographics Population-' -- -- -- 83,199 8,382,993 321,418,820 Population Annual Average Growth- 1.8% 1.0% 0.8% 1,328 80,589 2,590,222 Median Age' -- -- -- 39.1 37.5 37.2 Under 18 Years 25.1% 23.2% 24.0% 19,675 1,853,677 74,181,467 18 to 24 Years 7.9% 10.0% 9.9% 6,179 802,099 30,672,088 25 to 34 Years 11.7% 13.6% 13.3% 9,183 1,090,419 41,063,948 35 to 44 Years 14.6% 13.9% 13.3% 11,431 1,108,928 41,070,606 45 to 54 Years 16.0% 15.2% 14.6% 12,558 1,214,000 45,006,716 55 to 64 Years 1 1.9% 11.9% 11.8% 9,325 954,964 36,482,729 65 to 74 Years 7.5% 6.9% 7.0% 5,859 549,804 21,713,429 75 Years and Over 5.2% 5.3% 6.0% 4,095 427,133 18,554,555 Race: White 89.3% 68.6% 72.4% 69,934 5,486,852 223,553,265 Race: Black or African American 4.1% 19.4% 12.6% 3,175 1,551,399 38,929,319 Race: American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% 0.4% 0.9% 234 29,225 2,932,248 Race: Asian 1.2% 5.5% 4.8% 969 439,890 14,674,252 Race: Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 0.1% 0.2% 34 5,980 540,013 Race: Some Other Race 3.0% 3.2% 6.2% 2,379 254,278 19,107,368 Race: Two or More Races 2.0% 1 2.9% 2.9% 1,580 233,400 9,009,073 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 6.6% 7.9% 16.3% 5,168 631,825 50,477,594 Economic Labor Force Participation Rate and Size (civilian population 16 years and over)" 67 2% 64.8% 63.5% 42,542 4,229,948 157,940,014 Armed Forces Labor Force 0.1 % 1.7% 0.4% 79 108,658 1,025,497 Veterans, Age 18-64 9.0% 9.1% 5.8% 4,449 470,379 11,371,344 Median I-Iouschold Income -- -- -- $68,719 564,792 $53,482 Poverty Level (of all pcopIc 5.9% 1 1.5% 15.6% 4,641 914,237 47,755,606 Mean Commute Time (minutes)4 -- -- -- 30.0 27.8 25.7 Commute via Public Trans ortation 0.3% 4.5% 5.1% 118 178,442 7,157,671 Union Mcmbcrship53.4% 4.7% 11.1% -- -- -- Housing Total Housing Units -- -- -- 31,877 3,403,241 132,741,033 Median House Value (of owner -occupied units)3., -- -- -- 5223,300 $243,500 S 175,700 Homeowner Vacancy 2.5% 1.8% 2.1% 579 37,033 1,591,421 Rental Vacancy" 3.2% 6.4% 6.9% 220 71,372 3,105,361 Renter -Occupied Housing Units % of Occupied Units)" 22.3% 33.3% 35.6% 6,502 1,013,466 41,423,632 Occupied Housing Units w/no Vehicle Available (% of Occupied Units 3.8% 6.4% 9.1% l,l 16 194,153 ]0,594,153 Social No High School Diploma (educational attainment, age 25-64)4 10 7% 9 9% 12.0% 4,652 439,874 19,939,890 High School Graduate (educational attainment, age 25- 64)4 28.9% 23.9% 26.5% 12,534 1,062,241 44,000,387 Some College, No Degree (educational attainment, age 25-64)4 21.7% 20.6% 21.9% 9,437 914,402 36,270,359 Associate's Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 , 8.2% 7.7% 8.7% 3,571 342,942 14,487,486 Bachelor's Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 ` 19.3% 22.3% 19.7% 8,386 991,434 32,646,533 Postgrad Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 ' 11,1 % 15.5% 11.2% 4,836 689,184 18,533,513 Enrolled in Grade 12 % of population 1.7% 1.3% 1 1.4% 1,344 1 107,840 4,443,768 Disabled, Age 18-64 10.0% 9.1% 10.2% 4,895 460,216 19,703,061 Foreign Born 5.8% 1 1.6% 13.1% 4,657 948,484 41,056,885 Source: Job,rQ i, I. Census 2010, unless otherwise noted 2. Census 2015, annual average growth rate since 2005 3. Median values for certain aggregate regions (i.e. MSAs) may be estimated as weighted avenges of median values from composing counties 4. ACS 2010-2014 5. 2014; Current Population Survey, unionslats.com, and Clunura; county -and zip -love) (Into County of Frederick, VA 209 FY 2016 - 2017 Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts 0 THE CIP TABLE CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Department Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contribution- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional firnding sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs- The cost for each project, including county allocations and other funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in the 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project cost to the county of $1,015,369,550. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved field balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the county. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions frorn Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. • The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal fields, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. 21 County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Ensuing Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ Public Schools Elementary School #12 S1,600,000 S30,800,000 S32,400,000 S32,400,000 Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation Robert E. Aylor Middle School S1,400,000 $10,730,000 S8,970,000 $9.900,000 $31,000,000 $31,000,000 Addition and Renovation Fourth High School S1,700,000 S35,500,000 $32,200,000 S19,400,000 S3,100,000 $91,900,000 S91,900,000 James Wood High School Renov. (Prior to PY2015-2016 Cost) TBD TBD Sherando High School Parking Lot & Softball Feld Improvements TBD TBD Dowell J. Howard Center Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Phase 2 Renovation S8,900,000 S8,900,000 $8,900,000 Bass Hoover Elementary Phase 2 Renovation $9,000,000 $9,000.000 S9,000,000 County/School Board Administration Building TBD TBD Indian Hollow Elementary Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Elementary School #13 S24,700,000 $24,700,000 $24,700,000 Fifth Middle School $49,500,000 S49,500,000 $49,500,000 $4.700,000 $77,030,000 S41,170,000 $29,300.000 SO $92.100,000 $247,400,000 $247,400,000 Parks & Recreation Clearbrook & Sherando Water Slide/Spray Ground $1,352,000 $1,352,000 S1,352,000 Sherando Access Road w/Parkingrrrails $1,567,000 $1,567,000 $1,567,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility $480,000 S14,683,000 $15,163,006 $15,163,000 Snowden Bridge Park Development S3,161,000 $3,161,000 $3,161,000 Sherando Softball Complex S682,000 $682,006 $682,000 Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $85,000 $148,000 $2,702.000 $2,935,000 $2,935,000 Sherando Lake/Trails/Parking-2Fields $103,000 S1,281,000 $1,384.000 $1,384,000 Community Parks (3) $6,352,000 $6,352,000 $6,352,000 Neighborhood Parks (3) $2,285,000 $2,285,000 $2,285,000 District Parks (4) S15,717,000 $15,717,000 $15,717,000 Sherando Picnic Areas S818,000 $818,000 $818,000 Indoor Ice Rink S6,102,000 $6,102,000 $6,102.000 Community Center $8,952,000 $8.952,000 $8,952,000 Clearbrook Open Play Areas $487,000 $487,000 $487,000 Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade $1,300,000 $1,300,000 S1,300,000 Soccer/Multi Use Fields $1,141,000 $1,141,000 S1,141,000 Clearbrook Tennis/Basketball Complex $535,000 $535,000 $535,000 Sherando Skateboard Park $522,000 $522.000 $522,000 Clearbrook Shelter Stage $517,000 $517.000 $517,000 Fleet Trip Vehicles $295,000 $295,000 S295,000 is s County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Sherando Maintenance Compound $381,000 $381,000 $381.000 S6,645,000 S24,253,000 S35,572,000 $3,985,000 $1,193,000 SO $71,648.000 S71,648,000 Regional Library Gainesboro Library S155,023 S 1,465,736 $128,275 S1,749,034 $1,749,034 Senseny/Greenwood Library Route 522 South LibraryBranch TBD TBD TBD TBD S155,023 51,465,736 $128,275 SO SO S1,749,034 $1,749,034 Transportation I Funded Priorities 1-81 Exit 310 Improvements $49,121,000 $49,121,000 E $49,121,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 1) S36,082,000 $36,082,000 E $36,082,000 East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over 81 $6,000,000 S6,000,000 E $6,000,000 Unfunded Priorities Route 37 Engineering & Constructior S300,000,000 $300,000,000 E S300,000,000 1-81 Exit 307 Relocation $60,000,000 $60,000,000 E $60,000,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 2) $15,000,000 $15,000,000 E $15,000,000 Redbud Road Realignment $2,500,000 $2,500,000 E $2,500,000 Warrior Drive Extension $23,200,000 $23,200,000 E $23,200,000 Channing Drive Extension S20,600,000 S20,600,000 E $20,600,000 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign. $3.000,000 $3,000,000 E $3,000,000 Widening of Route 11 North $47,800,000 S47,800,000 E $47,800,000 Senseny Road Widening $22,800,000 $22,800,000 E $22.800,000 Invedee Way $10,200,000 $10,200,"0 E 110,210,000 • Fox Drive $250,000 S210,000 E $250,000 Rennaisance Drive $2,000,000 $2,000,000 E $2,000,000 Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD TBD $300.000,000 Sol SO $0 SO $298,553,000 $598,553.000 $598.553,000 Winchester Airport New General Avaiation Terminal $380,000 S2,600,000 A,B $2,980,000 Northside Connector $1,250,000 A,B S1,250,000 New Terminal Parking Lot S650,000 A,B $650,000 Land Parcel 64-A-66 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64-A-67 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-33A $175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-60 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A40 S175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-64 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Fuel Storage Facility $1,000,000 A,B S1,000,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-47 $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel 64-A49 $300,000 A,B $300.000 Land Parcel 64-A-50 $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 1 $235,0001 1 1 1 A,B $235.000 County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Land Parcel64B-A-52 $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel64-A-59 $300,000 A,B $300,000 North Side Svc Road $400,000 A,B $400,000 Taxiway "A" Relocation $200,000 $4,650,000 $4,800,000 A,B S9,650,000 $2.660.000 51,655,000 S3,250,000 $2,100,000 54,650,000 S4,800,000 SO $19.115,000 County Administration Clearbrook Convenience Site 520,000 S357,850 $377,850 E $377,850 Albin Convenience Site $24,000 S418,850 $442,850 5442,850 Relocation/Expansion Gore Site S24,000 $325,550 5349,550 _ 5349,550 General Government Capital Expe $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E S1,000,000 County/School Board Administration Building TBD TBD E TBD Joint Judicial Center Renovation / New Facility $4,065,500 520,000,000 $24,065,500 E S24'065,500 $4.285,500 $581,850 $642,850 $525,550 $200,000 $20,000,000 $26,235,750 $26,235:750 Fire & Rescue Fire & Rescue Station #22 (277) $400,000 51,500,000 $1,500,000 $31400,000 $3,400,000 F&R Station #22 (277) Apparatus $100,000 $805,000 $905,000 $905,000 Fire & Rescue Station #23 $550,000 S2,150,000 $1,000,000 $3,700,000 S3,700,000 Regional Training Center $75,000 $100,000 51,250,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 $31,175,000 $31,175,000 Fire & Rescue Station #24 (Gainesboro) 5250,000 53,500,000 53,750,000 C $3,750,000 Station #13 (Clearbrook) Relocation $33.000 $88,000 $4.275,000 54,396,000 El 54,396,000 $608.000 $3.293,0001 $12.675,000 $11,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250.000 47,326,000 547,326,000 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 ' See Fire & Rescue Company Requests (<$100K) $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,0001000 • $550,000 Apparatus Ventilation System for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $550,000 C $550,000 $550,000 Office and Living Quarters for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $550,000 C -$550,000 $100,000 Life Pack x3 for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $1 G0,000 C $100,000 $800,000 Rescue Engine Replacement for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $800,000 C $800,000 $342,766 North Mountain Fire & Rescue Co.Buildin Expansion $342,766 C 5342,766 $2,542,766 5200,000 $200,000 $200.000 $200,000 SO $3,342,766 $3.342,766 Total 5321,441,266 $107,167,873 $94,975,586 S47,238,825 $15,743,000 S425,703,0001 5996,254,550 $1,015,369,550 `Fire & Rescue Company Capital Equipment Requests (<$100K) None 50 A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation NIA- Not Mailable B• Partial funding from FAA TBD• To be Determined C- Partial funding from pmrate donations Da Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years � E• Partial funding anticipated through duvolopmont & revenue sources F• Funding initiated prior to displayed 5 years • • Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Multifamily Mobile Home/Other Totals (School Cost Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Southern Hills Phase II July 22, 2016 Student Generation Elementary Middle School High School School Student Student Student g Units# Housinzn Generation Generation Generation 130 25 12 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 130 25 12 14 Program Capacity Per Student Cost Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Capital Costs Elementary School Cost (2016-21 CIP) S24,700,000 850 $29,059 25 $726,000 Middle School Cost (2016-21 CIP) 549,500,000 940 552,660 12 $632,000 High School Cost (2016-21 CIP) 591,900,000 1,725 $53,275 14 $746,000 Total Student Generation 51 0 0 0 Total Capital Costs $2,104,000 T 0 • Annual Operational Costs FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Total Student Annual Budget) Generation Impact Development's Impact on FCPS Operational Costs S11,584 51 $591,000 age Annual Operational Cost Per Unit QA ZA4 School Facility Information Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) 2016-17 School Attendance Zone" Bass -Hoover R.E. Aylor Sherando June 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 1,518 2016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 1,400 x - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. 4 - Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. U •1 US Census Bureau Household and Families Document A l . r, Table 2. Households by 'IN/pe: 2000 atltid 2010 (For information on confidentiality protection, nonsampling errors, and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/sf1.pdf) Household type 2000 2010 Change, 2000 to 2010 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total households .................... 105,480,101 100.0 116,716,292 100.0 11,236,191 10.7 Family household .......................... 71,787,347 68.1 77,538,296 66.4 5,750,949 8.0 Husband -wife households ................. 54,493,232 51.7 56,510,377 48.4 2,017,145 3.7 With own children ...................... 24,835,505 23.5 23,588,268 20.2 -1,247,237 -5.0 Without own children ................... 29,657,727 28.1 32,922,109 28.2 3,264,382 11.0 Female householder, no spouse present...... 12,900,103 12.2 15,250,349 13.1 2,350,246 18.2 With own children ...................... 7,561,874 7.2 8,365,912 7.2 804,038 10.6 Without own children ................... 5,338,229 5.1 6,884,437 5.9 1,546,208 29.0 Male householder, no spouse present........ 4,394,012 4.2 5,777,570 5.0 1,383,558 31.5 With own children ...................... 2,190,989 2.1 2,789,424 2.4 598,435 27.3 Without own children ................... 2,203,023 2.1 2,988,146 2.6 785,123 35.6 Nonfamily households ...................... 33,692,754 31.9 39,177,996 33.6 5,485,242 16.3 Male householder ....................... 15,556,103 14.7 18,459,253 15.8 2,903,150 18.7 Living alone .......................... 11,779,106 11.2 13,906,294 11.9 2,127,188 18.1 Not living alone ........................ 3,776,997 3.6 4,552,959 3.9 775,962 20.5 Female householder ..................... 18,136,651 17.2 20,718,743 17.8 2,582,092 14.2 Living alone .......................... 15,450,969 14.6 17,298,615 14.8 1,847,646 12.0 Not living alone ........................ 2,685,682 2.5 3,420,128 2.9 734,446 27.3 Unmarried couple households' ............... 5,475,768 5.2 7,744,711 6.6 2,268,943 41.4 Opposite -sex partners .................... 4,881,377 4.6 6,842,714 5.9 1,961,337 40.2 Same -sex partnersl Summary File 1 counts ................. 594,391 0.6 901,997 0.8 307,606 51.8 Preferred estimates .................... 358,390 0.3 646,464 0.6 288,074 80.4 Average household size .................... 2.59 N 2.58 N - 0.01 W Average family size ........................ 3.14 N 3.14 N 0.00 N (X) Not applicable. i Unmarried couple households can be family or nonfamlly households depending on the relationship of others in the household to the householder. In this table, it is the sum of opposite -sox partners and same -sex partners from Summary File 1 counts. 2 Summary File 1 counts In this table are consistent with Summary Fite 1 counts shown in American FaclFinder. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1 and 2010 Census Summary File 1. average household size decreased over the decade, from 2.59 to 2.58, but average family size stayed the same, 3.14.E These indicators show a slowing of the downward trends that have existed since the end of the Baby Boom in the 1960s. In 1960, the average house- hold size was 3.29 people per 6 Average family size is the number of family members in the household (persons related to the householder including the householder) per family household. This computation excludes persons not related to the householder. household, and the average family size was 3.65 people per family.' The number of households within each category type increased in the last 10 years, including husband - wife households, which increased ' Average household size for 1960 may be found in Frank Hobbs and Nicole Stoops, "Demographic Trends in the 20th Century," Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-4 (November 2002), Figure 5-3. Average family size for 1960 may be found in U.S. Census Bureau, 1960 Census of Population, Supplementary Reports, PC(SI)-38, Families in the United States: 1960, Table 280. by 2.0 million. Figure 2 shows that, despite this increase, in 2010 less than half of all households (48 per- cent) were husband -wife house- holds, down from 52 percent in 2000 and 55 percent in 1990. This is the first time that husband -wife families fell below 50 percent of all households in the United States since data on families were first U.S. Census Bureau 0 0 Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts ]Devised 10/1 3/16 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide information specific to the SOuthern Hills -Please 2 Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 that demonstrates attributable impacts for the proposed 130 single-family detached residential lots. This document provides specific sections that identify residential attributable impacts for transportation, public safety, schools and parks and recreation services; as well as the proffered conditions that address these impacts. PROJECT SUMMARY The Southern Hills Subdivision was originally approved by Frederick County in 2001 for 250 single-family dWC1111lg L1111ts Oil 105± acres located oil the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012). The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions and monetary contributions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #01-01, Which included several off -site transportation improvements and a monetary contrlbllt1011 Of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained single family lots within Southern Hills -Phase 1 and modified the remainder of the project area to allow for 232 townhouse lots within Southern Hills -Phase 2 and to allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of the project identified as Southern Hills - Phase 3. The SOLIthCI.11 Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #22-06, which included the transportation improvements from Rezoning Application #01-01, the provision Of a 100' right-of- way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay to accommodate the fL1tL1rC CXtCI1s1011 OI SOL1111 Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation, and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot.-tc�talill`�1 1 ��),IO:OO. Arcadia Corn 111L1nities, LLC acduired the Phase I Single -Family Section, the Phase 2 Townhouse Section, and approximately 2.6± acres Of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay that is proposed to provide the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. Arcadia Communities, LLC has submitted a Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 for the portion of the Phase 2 Townhouse Land Bay and the 2.6± acre portion of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. This Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 Single -Family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 Townhouse lots, provides for the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 and Phase 3 Commercial Land Bays, and provides a-S';-1-1 _WAQ4).00 an $830,630.70 monetary contribllt1011. 4Mt i�-e-c�n�i�tent-���tl-�-theme-nlc->tlet�lt=}--�c�lltribution-��llue-fF}l-the-2 zl�-����1hF>t��e--lcn-s-al�p�-cc1-lu�c-1e1- Residential Attributable Impacts Document Revised October 13, 2016 TRANSPORTATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision IZezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in-lieu-Ol' the 232 townhouse lots Currently entitled l'or the pI'Olect. The proposed lZezomng Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides i'or a maximum Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed attributable impacts to transportation associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 505 VPD The proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 were determined to be appropriate to mitigate transportation impacts for the Southern Hills Subdivision. The proffered transportation improvements have been performed ill advance of'residential development activities, which InClUde the following: Completion of' the extension of Stickley Drive (IZoute 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairl'ax Pike (Route 277). ➢ Installation OIL guardrail along Town Run Lane (IZolltC 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. i Completion Oi new SUrIace material Overlay oI Town Run Lane (IZoute 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. hnplementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (IZoute 1085). Recordation of' the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area fOl- flltUre public street dedication to VDOT and/or Frederick County. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction 01' residential lots and will result in a reduction of vehicle trips generated from the proffered single- 1'amily lots. The SOLlthern Hills SUbdlvlsion has performed all pr011ered transportation Improvements deemed to be regUli'Cd to mitigate transportation Impacts and has provided VDOT and Frederick COLlnty With the ability to obtain the 100' right-of-way area for future public street improvements to connect to the proposed Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. These facts demonstrate that the Southern Hills Phase-2 Rezoning Application has addressed attributable impacts specific to the proposed residential development. Residential Attributable Impacts Document 2Revised October 13, 2016 0 • PUBLIC SAFETY — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer- Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled 17or the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance f7or 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maXiInUrn Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts froil7 residential development for public Safety services is determined by the number Of persons required to serve. The following Information ideItifies the average dumber Of persons projected for townhouse and single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to public safety associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/household = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size:': = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction 01' 197 persons Persons Per Household (PPH) Value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document — Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of'2.58. ":!:Average Family Size value determined from US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document. — Households by Type Table (page 5). The 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) DOCUmCIlt does not identify capital projects for the Sheriff's Office, nor does the CIP DOCUIllent identify capital projects for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, which is the first due company 1'Or the Southern Hills —Phase 2 residential lots. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCUIllent provides budget information for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office and for the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget DOCUmCIlt demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County, which a111O111ltS to approximately 77% for both the Sheriff's Office and the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document provides Costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for both departments. Operating Costs may include egUiplllent Costs (but are ]lot CXCIUSiVCly CCll11p111C1lt); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides conservative valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $1,207,973.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $930,139.00 $930,139.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $1 1.18/person $1 1.18 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $35.10/SFD household $35.10 x 130 SFD = $4,563.67 annual impact $4,563.70 x 10 years;!: = $4.5,636.70 Residential Attributable Impacts Document 3eturiubzr ! , ?t�I� Revisal October 13, 2016 VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $834,419.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $642,502.00 $642,502.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $7.72/person $7.72 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $24.24/SFD household $24.24 x 130 SFD = $3, 15 I.30 annual impact $3,151.30 x 10 years:' = $31,513.00 '''10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, Which WOUld regUire 6- 8 years for lot build -out. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. Tile CLII'1-Cnt Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) does not identify proposed proJCCts that are relevant to the Sheriff's Office and the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, nor does the CIP identify proposed capital projects in Which the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will have attributable impacts towards. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual BLldget Document provides a basis to determine potential local reVC11L1eS to 1Lllld Operating Costs for Public Safety Services. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% 01' alllWal Operating Costs over a 10-year period. This is a conservative valUation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build-OLlt projection for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete valL1C Of annual Operating Costs over the build -Out period. PUBLIC SCHOOLS — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 w tonhouse lots and provides for a maximum Of' 130 single-family detached residential lots. Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) utilizes the following student/household projects for siIlgle-falllily lots and for tOW1111OUSe lots as a basis for determining impacts to public schools: Single -Family Lots: Elementary School = 0. 19 students per household Middle SChOOI = 0.09 students per household High School = 0.10 students per household Residential Attributable Impacts Document 4 16 Revised October 13, 2016 0 0 Townhouse Lots: Elementary School = 0.13 students per household Middle School = 0.07 Students per household High School = 0.07 Students per household The Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will result in a reduction of 6 Elementary School students; 5 Middle School students; and 3 High School students based Oil projections Utilized by FCPS. FCPS provided information that states students from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will attend Bass-l-loover Elementary School, Robert E. Aylor Middle School, and Sherando High School. FCPS projects that there will be 25 Elementary School Students, 12 Middle School Students, and 14 High School Students from the 130 single-family lots Withlll SOLlthern Hills — Phase 2. This information indicates that there is SLIffICiCllt capacity at Bass -Hoover Elementary School and Robert E. Aylor Middle School to accommodate the projected Increase ill Students from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development; however, this information indicates that the capacity at Sherando High School is already exceeded by 118 SLUdelltS. FCPS has acquired property for a new high school that will provide for acceptable capacity for Students utilizing the new facility and for students at Sherando High School once the new facility is open. FCPS has received funding for design Services and anticipates opening the new high school facility in Fall 2019. CONCLUSION: FCPS has provided capital cost information for the new high school that assumes a price -per -Student Illllltpller for the School capacity, which totals $53,275.00 per student. FCPS projects that the Student generation from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will result in S-746,000,00 $745,850.00 of capital cost based on the price -per -student multiplier. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCUment provides blldgCt information for the School Debt Service (page 179), Which accOLllltS for all school projects ill the County that have been funded thl•OLlgh bond 1•CMILICS. This inforillati011 does not provide Sufficient inforillation to determine attributable impacts to specific schools; therefore, the S740,000, 0 $745,850.00 projection for the price-per-StlldCnt I11LIltlphCr for the new high School will be used for this analysis, Which Should be considered very conservative since students front the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will not utilize the new high school facility. PARKS & RECREATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots Currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 tOW1111OLIse lots and provides for a maxil11L1111 01' 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for parks and recreation Services iS determined by the number of' persons required to serve. The following information identifies the average Residential Attributable Impacts Document 5 Revised October 13, 2016 9 • number of persons projected for townhouse and single family (]Welling Unit; as well as the existing and pIoposed attributable Impacts t0 parks aild recreation associated With this rezoniIg regUest: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/household'I` = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size' = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction Of 197 persons '`Persons Per Household (PPI-I) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document— Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household sire value of 2.59. •0111 US CCIISLIs Bureau HOLIsehold and Families: 2010 Average Family Size Vflllle Cletel'mlilCCl fl Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual I3udget Document provides budget information for the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - Frederick County 2016-2017 (page 195). The Budget Document identifies that the CIP consists of a schedUIC foI' major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. Additionally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is strictly advisory and that it is possible particular projects may not be funded during the year that it is indicated in the CIP. Finally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. The 2015-2016 CIP Document provides a section entitled Project Funding (page 21), which identifies how capital projects are funded for various agencies and divisions. The CIP Document states that funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved FLlnd balance of the County. Additionally, the CIP Document advises that the Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private Sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. The Parks and Recreation Department identifies $71,648,000.00 in CIP projects that are to be Funded by the County during the 2015-2020 fiscal years. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County Parks and Recreation during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years for Sherando Park (page 151). Funding for this regional park is achieved primarily from fees charged for use of facilities and from local revenues. Local revenues for C'11, tl�r>F}I� I�rFl��t��11�1 :Sf:68I ()()—clllrin�� thl-2()IS()16--ancl-?(}17--1i,e II-}f�111I--��-bile Sherando Park averaged $267,347.00. The percentage of local revenues to fund Sherando Park averaged 64%, With the remaining funding COnling frOnl fees Charged fOr L1SC Of facilities. The Budget Document provides Costs attributable t0 Personnel and Operating for Gleaf-111--ook-Pa+l,� i}A Sherando Park. Operating Costs may inClUde CC1Llipillent Costs (bllt are not exclusively eClllipment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local COnt•ibUtiOnS provides valuation that can Residential Attributable Impacts DOCUment 6 016 Revised October 13, 2016 be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. It is more than likely that residents Of the Southern Hills —Phase 2 project will Utilize Sherand0 Park based on the proximity of the regional park to this project. Ilowevei- tile-residentj++l ttttril�utttl�ll�inll�+ic��-h+i�-e 1�+1e11 c=�>Fl4ic�erecl-k>r-bt->th-tt �� i+�+l++l-Il+irl, s-f+-+t-tht-p+n-pt->se-�->I=t Il i �-z+ntt I-y�i s���41��11-pi�>� icle4-c=+-+n���F�4tt-ice t- SHERANDOPARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $243,123.00 x .64 (Local Fl]ndS): = $15.5,598.72 $155,598.72/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.87/person $1.87 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Sire) = $5.87/SFD household $5.87 x 130 SFD = $763.10 annual impact $763.10 x 10 years'` = $7,631.00 C=14----A-l�-PI � (-)()1-I-Xj�-K c 1 .02 , 1. -I- -M 4-)-AA-c�--t. I ,am-i-13 0t+.�,eh01-d ()fktfillffid-i-+llp+wt 5�116-04> x-IO--years �4-460-.00 10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A no]'l1lal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. SHERANDO PARK ATTRII3UTABLE IMPACT = $7,631.00 TGYIA-I=I!-A-I:I<S-&-ICI GI I- WTI 0N-A=1=Hv) I13IJ'1=A-I3I-,I IN.111 1C"1' 4-4-1-7-9-I.00 CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction 01' residential lots and will result in a rcdllcti011 of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Document does not identify capital projects that were demonstrated for funding during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal year budgets. Additionally, the CIP identifies that funding for Parks and Recreation Department capital projects will Collie from the unreserved I'und balance of the County. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for Sherando Regional Park. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total Value Of operating costs is ]lot eXCII]S+VCIy for capital Residential Attributable impacts Document 7 Revised October 13, 2016 costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period for Regional Park. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build - out projectioIl for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -out period. SOUTHERN HILLS —PHASE 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The information in this document has been developed to determine attributable impacts from the Southern I -fills —Phase 2 Development to demonstrate that the$830,630.70 monetary contribution identified in Section D. Monetary Contributions of the J-t*ie-3470ctober 13, 2016 Proffer Statement is appropriate. The following information is provided from the various sections of this document: Transportation Impacts: NONE (all proffered transportation improvements complete) Public Safety Impacts: $ 77,149.70 Total Public Schools Impacts: �746,()0(},00 $745,850.00 Total Parks & Recreation Impacts: $7,631.00 Total Total Impacts: S,8- 44)40,70 $830,630.70 Total Proffered Monetary Contribution:$830,630.70 Attachments • Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit 6-30- I6 •:• Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts • Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables •:• US Census Bureau I-10LIsehold and Families Document Residential Attributable Impacts Document 3rptrinher I? (ilk Revised October 13, 2016 5� 0 • Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts 9/15/16 PURPOSE The purpose of this document is to provide information specific to the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Proffer Statement dated .tune 30, 2016 that demonstrates attributable impacts for the proposed 130 single-family detached residential lots. This document provides specific sections that identify residential attributable impacts for transportation, public safety, schools and parks and recreation services; as well as the proffered conditions that address these impacts. PROJECT SUMMARY The Southern Hills Subdivision was originally approved by Frederick County in 2001 for 250 single-family dwelling units on 105± acres located on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012). The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions and monetary contributions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #01-01, Which included several off -site transportation improvements and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained single family lots within SOuthCrn Flills-Phase 1 and modified the remainder of the project area to allow for 232 townhouse lots within Southern Hills —Phase 2 and to allow commercial "zoning in the northern portion of the project identified as Southern Hills — Phase 3. The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved with specific development conditions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #22-06, which included the transportation improvements from Rezoning Application #01-01, the provision of a 100' right-of- way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation, and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot, totaling $1,139,120.00. Arcadia Communities, LLC acquired the Phase 1 Single -Family Section, the Phase 2 Townhouse Section, and approximately 2.6± acres of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay that is proposed to provide the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. Arcadia Communities, LLC has submitted a Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 for the portion of the Phase 2 Townhouse Land Bay and the 2.6f acre portion of the Phase 3 Comimel'clal Land Bay. This Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 Single -Family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 Townhouse lots, provides for the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 and Phase 3 Commercial Land Bays, and provides a $1,139,120.00 monetary contribution that is consistent with the monetary contribution value for the 232 Townhouse lots approved under Rezoning Application #22-06. Residential Attributable Impacts Document I September 15, 2016 0 0 TRANSPORTATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS 0 The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed attributable impacts to transportation associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 505 VPD The proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 were determined to be appropriate to mitigate transportation impacts for the Southern Hills Subdivision. The proffered transportation improvements have been performed in advance of residential development activities, which include the following: ➢ Completion of the extension of Stickley Drive (Route 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). ➢ Installation of guardrail along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. ➢ Completion of new surface material overlay of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. ➢ Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). ➢ Recordation of the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to VDOT and/or Frederick County. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of vehicle trips generated from the proffered single- family lots. The Southern Hills Subdivision has performed all proffered transportation improvements deemed to be required to mitigate transportation impacts and has provided VDOT and Frederick County with the ability to obtain the 100' right-of-way area for future public street improvements to connect to the proposed Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. These facts demonstrate that the Southern Hills Phase-2 Rezoning Application has addressed attributable impacts specific to the proposed residential development. • Residential Attributable Impacts Document 2 September 15, 2016 • PUBLIC SAFETY — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffcr Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for public safety services is determined by the nLlmber of persons regUlred to SCI-ve. The following information Identifies the average number of persons projected for toWlllloUSC and single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to public safety associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 TownhOUSCS x 2.61 persons/household* = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Singlc-Family x 3.14 average family size-" = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 197 persons ''`Persons Per I-louschold (PPI-1) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document — Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.58. 14-14Average Family Size value determined from US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Document does not identify capital projects for the Sheriff's Office, nor does the CIP Document identify capital projects for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, which is the first due company for the Southern Hills —Phase 2 residential lots. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Frederick County Sherifl's Office and for the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County, which amounts to approximately 77% for both the Sheriff's Office and the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for both departments. Operating Costs may include equipment costs (but are not exclusively equipment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides conservative valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $1,207,973.00 x .77 (Local Funds) _ $930,139.00 $930,139.00/83,199 (FC Population) _ $1 1.18/person $1 1.18 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) _ $35.10/SFD household $35.10 x 130 SFD = $4,563.67 annual impact • $4,563.70 x 10 years* _ $45,636.70 Residential Attributable Impacts Document 3 September 15, 2016 0 0 VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE 0 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $834,419.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $642,502.00 $642,502.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $7.72/person $7.72 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $24.24/SFD household $24.24 x 130 SFD = $3,151.30 annual impact $3,151.30 x 10 years* = $31,513.00 * 10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) does not identify proposed projects that are relevant to the Sheriff's Office and the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company, nor does the CIP identify proposed capital projects in which the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will have attributable impacts towards. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for Public Safety Services. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build -out projection for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -out period. PUBLIC SCHOOLS — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) utilizes the following student/household projects for single-family lots and for townhouse lots as a basis for determining impacts to public schools: Single -Family Lots: Elementary School = 0.19 students per household Middle School = 0.09 students per household High School = 0.10 students per household n U Residential Attributable Impacts Document 4 September 15, 2016 C.� 0 Townhouse Lots: Elementary School = 0.13 Students per household Middle School = 0.07 Students per household High School = 0.07 students per household The Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will result in a reduction of 6 Elementary School students; 5 Middle School Students; and 3 High School students based on projections utilized by FCPS. FCPS provided information that states Students front the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will attend Bass-I-loovcr Elementary School, Robert E. Aylor Middle School, and Sherando High School. FCPS projects that there will be 25 Elementary School Students, 12 Middle School Students, and 14 High School Students from the 130 single-family lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2. This information indicates that there is sufficient capacity at Bass-Hoovcr Elementary School and Robert E. Aylor Middle School to accommodate the projected increase in students fi-om the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development; however, this information indicates that the capacity at Sherando High School is already exceeded by 118 students. FCPS has acquired property for a new high school that will provide for acceptable capacity for students utilizing the new facility and for students at Sherando I-ligh School once the new facility is open. FCPS has received funding for design services and anticipates opening the new high school facility in Fall 2019. • CONCLUSION: FCPS has provided capital cost information for the new high school that assumes a I)l-ice-per-student lllultil)lier for the school capacity, which totals $53,275.00 per student. FCPS projects that the Stl.ldellt gellcratloll fl'olll the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will result in $746,000.00 of capital cost based on the price -per -student multiplier. The Frederick County 2016- 2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the School Debt Service (page 179), which accounts for all school projects in the County that have been funded through bond revenues. This information does not provide sufficient information to determine attributable impacts to specific schools; therefore, the $746,000.00 projection for the price -per -student multiplier for the new high school will be used for this analysis, which should be considered very conservative since students from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will not utilize the new high school facility. PARKS & RECREATION — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maxllllulll of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for parks and recreation services is determined by the number of persons required to serve. The following informatioI1 identifies the average Residential Attributable Impacts Document 5 September 15, 2016 0 0 number of persons projected for townhouse and single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to parks and recreation associated with this rezoning request: 0 Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 person s/household* = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size* = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 197 persons *Persons Per Household (PPH) value determined fi•om Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document — Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size value of 2.59. **Average Family Size value determined fi•om US Census Bureau Household and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - Frederick County 2016-2017 (page 195). The Budget Document identifies that the CIP consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. Additionally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is strictly advisory and that it is possible particular projects may not be funded during the year that it is indicated in the CIP. Finally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. The 2015-2016 CIP Document provides a section entitled Project Funding (page 21), which identifies how capital projects are funded for various agencies and divisions. The CIP Document states that funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. Additionally, the CIP Document advises that the Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. The Parks and Recreation Department identifies $71,648,000.00 in CIP projects that are to be funded by the County during the 2015-2020 fiscal years. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County Parks and Recreation during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years for Clearbrook Park (page 150) and Sherando Park (page 151). Funding for the two regional parks is achieved primarily from fees charged for use of facilities and from local revenues. Local revenues for Clearbrook Park averaged $143,684.00 during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years, while Sherando Park averaged $267,347.00. The percentage of local revenues to fund Clearbrook Park averaged 36% and Sherando Park averaged 64%, with the remaining funding coming from fees charged for use of facilities. The Budget Document provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park. Operating Costs may include equipment costs (but are not exclusively equipment); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. It is more than likely that Residential Attributable Impacts Document 6 September 15, 2016 9 9 • residents of the Southern Hills —Phase 2 project will utilize Shcrando Park based on the proximity of the regional park to this project. However, the residential attributable impacts have been considered for both regional parks for the purpose of this analysis, which provides conservative valuation for attributable impacts associated with this project. HERANDO PAR 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $243,123.00 x .64 (Local Funds)". _ $155,598.72 $155,598.72/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.87/person $1.87 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $5.87/SFD household $5.87 x 130 SFD = $763.10 annual impact $763.10 x 10 years" = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $234,843.00 x .36 (Local Funds) _ $84,543.48 $84,543.48/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.02/person $1.02 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $3.20/SFD household $3.20 x 130 SFD = $416.00 allllual impact $416.00 x 10 years* = $4,160.00 • .;.10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. SHERANDO PARK ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACT = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PARK ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACT = $4,160.00 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACT = $1 1,791.00 CONCLUSION: The S011tllel•11 1-fills-Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction Of residential lots and will result in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Document does not identify capital projects that were demonstrated for funding during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal year budgets. Additionally, the CIP identifies that funding for Parks and Recreation Department capital projects will CO111C fi•0111 the unreserved fund balance Of the County. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for the Clearbrook Regional Park and the Shcrando Regional Park. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital icosts. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Residential Attributable Impacts Document 7 September 15, 2016 1] 0 Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period for both Clearbrook Regional Park and Sherando Regional Park. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build - out projection for the 130 single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -out period. SOUTHERN HILLS —PHASE 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The information in this document has been developed to determine attributable impacts from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development to demonstrate that the $1,139,120.00 monetary contribution identified in Section D. Monetary Contributions of the June 30, 2016 Proffer Statement is appropriate. The following information is provided from the various sections of this document: Transportation Impacts: NONE (all proffered transportation improvements complete) Public Safety Impacts: $ 77,149.70 Total Public Schools hnpacts: $746,000.00 Total Parks & Recreation hnpacts: $ 11,791.00 Total Total Impacts: Monetary Contribution: Attachments $834,940.70 Total $1,139,120.00 Total (+ $304,179.30) ❖ Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit 6-30-16 ❖ Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts ❖ Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts ❖ Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables ❖ US Census Bureau Household and Families Document -0 • Residential Attributable Impacts Document 8 September 15, 2016 IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85ll-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia ('omintinities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com 0 0 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Fredrick County by the proffered rezoning of a 40.36±-acre subject property owned by Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VM13 Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -in alter the "Owner"). The subject property is identified as Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95, which is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The subject property is split -zoned and is comprised of 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B-2, Business General District. The Subject property is a component of' a 105± acre parcel that was originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01-01) and Subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Perlormance District and B-2, Business General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre subject property to maintain the Same acreage o1 RP, Residential Perlormance District and B-2, Business General District land area, and to modily the prof ter statement to limit development of the 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Perlormance District to a maximum of 130 single- family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' right -of -Way area within the 2.57± acre B-2, Business General District portion of' the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to accommodate the ILitnre extension Oi SOLIth Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation as proffered Linder Rezoning Application #22- 06. Basic information Location: Fronting on the cast side of' Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles South of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) Magisterial District: Opequon District Tax Map Parcel Number: 85D-1-1-9.5 File 113126V Impact Analysis StatentenUFAW 2 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning CL11.1-Cnt Z011illg: RP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Current Use: Undeveloped (Note: Single family detached i-esiden.tial lots platted and some lots developed in Southern Hills — Phase 1) Proposed Zoning: IZP, Residential Performance District (37.79± acres) B-2, Business General District (2.57± acres) Proposed Use: Single -Family Detached Residential Lots (RP District) Public Street Reservation Area (132 District) Total Rezoning Area: 40.36±-acres with revised proffers for the Subject property COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Urban Development Area The Urban Development Area (UDA) defines the general area in which residential, commercial, indUStrlal and 1nStltlltional land use development is encouraged ill the COUllty. The 40.36±-acre Subject property is currently located within the UDA; therefore, expansion Of the UDA bOUndary to accommodate the proposed development Of single-family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the future extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Sewer and Water Service Area The Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) is generally consistent with the UDA, but also extends outside of the UDA to accommodate arCaS of the COLlllty ill which commercial and industrial land use development is only desired. The 40.36±-acre Subject property is CLII-I'Ciltly located within the SWSA; therefore, expansion of the SWSA bOUndary t0 accommodate the proposed development of single-family detached residential lots and a public street reservation area for the fUlLlre extension of South Warrior Drive is not required for this rezoning application. Comprehensive Plan Conformity The 40.36±-acre Subject property is located in the UDA and the SWSA and is within the study area boundary of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan is a large -area plan that identifies land uses, transportation networks, and Other matters that are recommended for considerat1011 for future land use and development within this geographic area of the County. The 40.36±-acre Subject property is identified for residential and bLlSil1CSS land use; therefore, the proposed RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, File 10126V Impact Analysis Statemen[/FAW 3 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Business General District rezoning 1S in coillormance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Southern Frederick Area Plan Transportation Map identifies a new minor arterial road system that traverses the subject property. The alignment of the new minor arterial road is located within the B-2, Business General District portion 01 the Subject property, which has been identified as a public street reservation area; therefore, the proposed rezoning is in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE Access The 40.36±-acre subject property is located on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). Access to the single-family detached residential lots will be provided along Town Run Lane and through a system of public streets internal to the RP, Residential Performance District portion of the subject property. The single-family detached residential lots will not have access from the 13-2, Business General District portioll of the Subject property that has been established by deed as a future public street reservation area. Flood Plains The 40.36±-acre subject property contains a Small area of floodplain within the B-2, Business General District portion of the Subject property along the eastern property line that is associated with Stephens Run. The subject property is located within FEMA NFIP Map #51069C0330D, Effective Date September 2, 2009, and is primarily located within Flood Zone X with the exception of the small area of floodplain within the 13-2, Business General District portion of the subject property. The single-family detached residential lots proposed for Southern Hills — Phase 2 are located completely outside of the floodplain limits. Wail'Inrlc The 40.36±-acre Subject property does not contain wetland areas as demonstrated on the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) Map information from the Frederick County GIS Database. However, the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007 identifies delileated wetland areas along the SolltheIn boundary of the subject property. The delineated wetland areas are located within the open space portion Of the subject property and will not be impacted by the developed of the single-family detached residential lots proposed for Southern Hills — Phase 2. Soil Types The 40.36±-acre subject property contains three soil types as demonstrated by the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia and the Frederick County GIS Database. The Following soil type is present on site: File H3126V Impact Analysis Statement/FAW 4 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning 913: Clearbrook Channery Silt Loams 2-7% slopes 32C: Blairton Silt Loams 7-1.5% slopes 41C/D/E: Weikert-Berks Channery Silt Loams 7-65% slopes None of the soil types within the subject property are identified as a prime agricultural soil and all types have high shrink/swell properties. The 40.36±-acre subject property has similar soil conditions as Southern Hills — Phase 1, which has been developed with public streets and single-family detached residential lots. Other Environmental Features The 40.36±-acre subject property does not contain areas of steep slope, lakes or ponds or natural stormwater retention areas as defined by the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and as delineated on the Southern Hills Master Development Plan approved by Frederick County on April 9, 2007. There are no known environmental features present that create development constraints for the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2. ADJOINING PROPERTIES Adjoining property zoning and present use: North: B-2, Business General District South: IZP, Residential Performance District East: RP, IZesidential Performance District West: RA, Rural Areas District TRANSPORTATION Use: Unimproved Use: Southern Hills — Phase 1 USC: Southern Hills — Phase 1 Use: Unimproved The 40.36±-acre subject property is located On the east side of Town Run Lane (IZOute 1012), approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The subject property is generally identified as Southern Hills — Phase 2 (the middle section Of the SOLlthern Hills Subdivision). Frederick COLulty originally approved Rezoning Application #01-01, which established RP, Residential Performance District zoning over the 105± acre parent tract that includes the 40.36± acre subject property. The approved Proffer Statement f7or this rezoning required the 105± acre property to be developed as single family lots and included several off -site transportation i111p1'OVC111CIItS. SLIbSCCILICIltly, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained the single family lots within Idle 1t3126V Impact Analysis Slatement/IiAW Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Southern Hills - Phase I and modified the remainder of the pro_lect area to allow for 232 towIhouse lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 and to allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of the project (Southern Hills — Phase 3). The approved Proff'cr Statement for this rezoning carried torward the transportation improvements from the original proffers, restricted the Southern Hills - Phase 2 Land Bay to townhouse lots, and provided for a 100' right-of-way area between the townhouses and the commercial land bay to accommodate the future extension of South Warrior Drive to the future Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. The original property owner implemented the proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06. These transportation improvements are identified oil the Transportation Proffer Compliance Map Exhibit and include the following: Completion of the extension of Stickley Drive (Route 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (Route 1012) to facilitate a new tral'l'ic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). Installation 01' guardrail along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. Completion of new surface material overlay of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 108.5). The 40.36± acre subject property is inclusive of the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Land Bay that is approved for 232 townhouse lots; as well as the 100' right-of-way area to accommodate the future extension of' South Warrior Drive. The Owner has reserved the 100' right-of-way area For future public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 Prol'fer Statement. This public street reservation is legally recorded by deed and plat as Instrument No. 160002930/0001, which is i11ClUded as Information In the proposed rezoning application. The proposed Rezoning Application Prol'fer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides For a il7aximU111 of 130 single-lalmlly detached residential lots. The following information identifies the existing and proposed traFf'ic impacts associated with this rezoning request: EXISTING IMPACTS: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD PROPOSED IMPACTS: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD REDUCED IMPACT: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of 505 VPD The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application has provided for the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to ensure this is available to Frederick County and VDOT for the extension ol' South Warrior Drive as per the Rezoning Application #22-06 ProFler Statement, and prevlollS (level opmen t activities associated with Mile 113126V Impact Analysis Slalement/I.Aw 6 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communifts, L.L.C. Rezoning the SOn01CI-11 Hills — Phase I Land Bay have implemented all other transportation improvements. Additionally, the proposed rezoning application reSL1ltS in a I'CCILICtloll of' 505 vehicles per clay that reduces Impacts to the Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085) intersection. Therefore, the proposed rezoning application adegUately mitigates transportation impacts to Frederick County. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT Tile 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, the property is entitled to be served by public sewer based on County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider of pLlbhc sewer service within this area of the County and Currently has sewer infrastructure within Southern Hills — Phase 1 that includes gravity sewer lines, a pump station and a fOL11'-inch sewer force Main that directs CfflLICllt to a 15-inch sewer transmission line t0 the Parkins Mill Treatment Facility (PMTF). The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/clay per residential connection is an appropriate calCUlation for estimating the sewer demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed sewer demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is Currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statenlent proposes to allow for the development of a maxlllll1111 of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected sewer demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential Connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provicles for a reduction of 30,600 GPD of sewer demand from the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The sewer system clesign for Southern Hills — Phase 2 will incorporate an on -site gravity collection system that directs effluent from the single-family detached residential lots to the existing FCSA pump station located immediately cast of the subject properly. The existing pump station was designed, approved and Constructed as a 0.135 MGD facility. The projected sewer demand for the existing single-family clelached residential lots within Idle #3126V Impact Analysis StatemenUliAW 7 • 0 (keenway Engineering June 30. 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Southern Hills — Phase I and the proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is approximately 50% Of the design capacity Of the existing FCSA pllnlp station. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application can be accommodated by the existing FCSA sewer system infrastructure. WATER SUPPLY The 40.36±-acre subject property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA); therefore, [lie property is entitled to be served by public water based on County Policy. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) is the provider of public water service within this area of the County and has an existing 12" water line located along Town Run Lane (Route 1012) that provides public water to the property. Additionally, a 12' water line and all 8" Water line have been conStruCtCd Withlil Southern Hills Phase 1 that extend to the Southern Hills — Phase 2 property. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) has determined that 300 gallons/day per residential connection is an appropriate calculation for estimating the Water demand for residential land use projects. Existing and proposed water demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is C111TC1ltly approved for the development ol' 232 townhouse lots; therel*Ore, the projected Water demand is as follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 232 residential connections Q = 69,600 GPD projected at residential build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proi'1'er Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maxiil111111 Of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected Water demand is as Follows: Q = 300 gallons/day/per residential connection Q = 300 GPD x 130 residential connections Q = 39,000 GPD projected at residential build -Out REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides 1'or a reduction of 30,600 GPD of water demand front the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The water system design for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 single-family detached residential lots will expand on the existing water system that was developed for Southern Hills — Phase 1. This design will provide 1'or water line looping to ensure that adequate water pressure is available for residential service and l'or fire flow. The projected water demand for the existing single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 1 and the Pile 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/GAW 8 0 Cireenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning proposed single-family detached residential lots within Southern Hills — Phase 2 result in a projected sewer demand of 67,200 GPD, which is a reduction of 30,600 GPD below the projected water needs for the subject property. Therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application can be accommodated by FCSA and by the existing water system infrastructure. SITE DRAINAGE The 40.36±-acre subject property has a drainage divide that directs drainage to the east and to the south to defined channels that flow into Stephens Run. The proposed single-family detached residential lots will be developed as Curb and gutter streets and will incorporate storlllwater illanagement design that will ilICiCICIC Storlllwater detention ponds on the eastern and southern portion Of' the subject property on the upper side Of the Stephens Run drainage channels. Storlllwater quality measures will be evaluated during the Subdivision Design Plan process and will be achieved through on -site quality measures Or a combination Of On -Site quality measures and nutrient credits if necessary. The storlllwater ClUantity and quality measures will be designed in conformance with all applicable state and local regulations; therefore, site drainage and storlllwater management impacts to adjoining properties and the community will be adequately mitigated. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL The impact on SOhd waste disposal associated with the development o[ the 40.36± subject site can be projected from an average 11111Ual residential CO11SUnlptlOn Of 5.4 Cubic yards per household (Civil Engineering Reference Manual, 4t11 Edition). The Frederick County Public Works Department is responsible for solid waste disposal as the manager Of the Regional Landfill Facility. Existing and proposed solid waste disposal demands for the 40.36± subject site are as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern Hills — Phase 2 is Currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the prOJCCted solid waste demand is as follows: AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 232 residential units AV = 1,253 Cu. Yd. at residential build -Out, or 877 tolls/yr at build -out PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maxinlunl Of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the projected solid waste demand is as follows: AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. per household AV = 5.4 Cu. Yd. x 130 residential units AV = 702 Cu. Yd. at residential build -Out, or 491 tons/yr at build -out File #f3126V Impact Analysis Statement/HAW 9 • • Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides fora reduction of 386 tons/yr of solid waste demand front the Southern Hills — Phase 2 development proposal. The ML1111C1pal Solid Waste area Of the Regional Landfill has a C111'1'ent remaining Capacity Of 13,100,000 cubic yards of air space. The projected build0L1t Of Southern 1-Iills — Phase 2 will generate approximately 491 tons of solid waste annually on average. This represents a 0.24% increase in the annual solid Waste received by the MUnicipal Solid Waste area of the Regional Landfill, Which currently averages 200,000 tolls per year and is a redL1Ctl011 171'0111 the annual solid Waste disposal that W011ld OtIM-WISC OCCLII' Under the existing residential land use plan. The Regional Landfill has adequate capacity to accommodate the solid waste impacts associated With this proposal. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify structures deemed to be historically significant on the 40.36±-acre subject property, nor does the survey identify properties within proximity of this site that are deemed potentially significant. The closest potentially significant structure is identified as the Wise-RitenOur I-IOLISC (34-1209), which is located approximately 0.3 Miles SOLltheast Of the SLlbfect property. The National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify the 40.36±-acre subject property as being located within defined Civil War Battlefield study area boundaries. Therefore, the proposed single -faintly detached residential lot development plan for the subject property will not create negative impacts associated with historic resources. COMMUNITY FACILITY IMPACT'S The 40.36±-acre subject property is a component of a 105± acre parcel that was Originally rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District with proffers (Rezoning Application #01- 01) and subsequently rezoned as RP, Residential Performance District and B-2, BLlsiness General District with proffers (Rezoning Application #22-06). Rezoning Application #22-06 was approved for the development of 232 tOW1111OLISC lots, while the proposed Rezoning Application would redUCC this impact through the proffered maximum development Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Rezoning Application #22-06 provides for a total monetary COntribLIG011 valLIC of $1,139,120.00 to offset impacts to community facilities. The proposed Rezoning Application maintains this same level Of funding to offset impacts to Community facilities even though this proposal demonstrates a reduction of more than 100 residential lots. The Owner's Proffer Statement requires the inclusion of a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary contribution for each single-family detached residential lot that File 113126V Impact Analysis Statement/EAW Ill 0 0 Greenway Engineering June 30, 201E Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning equates to the total monetary contribution of $1 ,139,120.00 divided by the total number of single-family detached residential lots. This approach ensures that the Owner will provide the same level of funding to offset impacts to community facilities regardless if the total number of lots falls below the maxullum 130 single-family detached residential lots identified in the proposed Proffer Statement. The school student generation impact to Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) is calculated by the County Development Impact Model (CDIM). Currently, the CDIM projects single-faillily detached residential land use at 0.40 Students per household (SFD = 0.19 Elementary School Students; 0.10 Middle School Students; 0.1 1 I-ligh School Students) and I)I'OjCCtS townhouse residential land use at 0.27 Students per household (TH = 0.13 Elementary School Students; 0.07 Middle School Students; 0.07 I-Iigh School Students). Existing and proposed school student generation impact to FCPS is as follows: EXISTING DEMAND: Southern 1-fills — Phase 2 Is Currently approved for the development of 232 townhouse lots; therefore, the school student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 63 students. PROPOSED DEMAND: The Southern Hills = Phase 2 Rezoning Application Proffer Statement proposes to allow for the development of a maxinlUrn Of 130 single-family detached residential lots; therefore, the school student generation impact to FCPS is projected to be 52 students. REDUCED IMPACT: The Rezoning Application provides for a reduction 01' 11 school students that will be generated from the Southern 1-lills — Phase 2 development proposal. OTHER POTENTIAL IMPACTS The Ewing Family Cemetery is located within the southeastern portion of the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Proffer Statements associated with Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 provided for the creation of a separate lot for the Ewing Family Cemetery With access from a public street within the property; as Well as an access casement from the public street t0 the cemetery that Would be maintained by the Ewing Family. The proposed Proffer Statement provides for this Sallie commitment; therefore, there are no impacts associated with the Ewing Family Cemetery that Will result f1'0111 the development Of single family detached residential lots on the 40.36±-acre subject property. The Owner proposes to rezone the 40.36±-acre subject property to maintain the same acreage of RP, Residential Performance District and 13-2, Business General District land area, and to modify the proffer statement to limit development Of the 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District to a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots, while maintaining the 100' right-of-way area within the 2.57± acre 13-2, Business General District portion of the property as a reservation area for future public street dedication to Pile #3126V Impact Analysis StatemenYFAW 1 I 0 0 Greemvay I3ngincering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning accommodate the fntUre CXtCI1S1011 Of SOUth Warrior Drive to the ILILLII-C Interstate 81 CXIt 307 relocation as proffered under Rezoning Application #22-06. This Rezoning Application results in a reduction of total vehicle trips, a reduction of sewer demand, a I-edLICt1011 of water Clemand, a reCILICtloll OI SOhd waste demand, and a I-CCILICtloll Of school Students, while maintain the same level 01' funding to offset impacts to cor11rl1unity facilities proffered under Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner's Proffer StatemenL provides assurances for these reductions and for this funding C01111111LI11Cnt; therefore, the proposed Rezoning Application has adequately mitigated impacts to Frederick County. Attachments: Aerial Overview Map Exhibit Southern Frederick Area Plan Land Use Map Exhibit Location and Zoning Map Exhibit Transportation Pro%fer Compliance Exhibit SWSA & UDA Map Exhibit Environmental Features Map Exhibit FEMA FIRM Map Exhibit Soils Map Exhibit Historic Features Map Exhibit File 113126v Impac w f f�; .x Legend O Pomon of TM 650-1 1-95 Suofecf to Rezoning Amendment PufDYc Street Rese-ata Area Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary j Stephens Gty Town Limits 1 Wy S +r' vS wAK F��LacD+�r•,, .. ,DM S— F,• C—gy A GJSD•p� 2016DW 30t5Arr�PMo6 CovMYd VGlUV�TA IrT�V�'^�O�.Y.vprr tlo.hrcq•'•..{....... .HM{'.� '.I GEFIELD W _ LLJ cn z Z s Qw� z w � a Y o 5; � = Q O QD ,�4<r Z Z_ Q � Z � �tirq = O w w o Feet 400 0 400 W U Q = w 2 y H Q w 3 0 a w Q > n w w i o Ch , S U V Z Z Q W w Z U O = I OUj Z S2 O O w R I 0 w M w m O W SWJ N Southern Frederick Area Plan A Land Use OSouf a F.eoenck Ma Ran OUrban Devewpnenl Ives OSfv i WWW Se—ce Ms vanes Long Range Lend Use Plan Res d"M &I �i- �� Hqn Densty R"zoratai lkDan Cams' yL. law t I • f OkM COTIiIafOa '� L 7� .�' :' •, ._.��i,�\� •���.a.ty..aa MPeo-Usa _ • me _. . w. Mdeo Jse ComrasLKAce �. % i mm" Jse s.anesiAO m •. � f - ® Heavy ndwtris- EktrsOve M ERR—J _ L\� l / , �•1�i.-- OComnrMy Canes, �• % 1 '-. cn d Reswe natR�sonat � � l r —1.J = t•. 'i ; � r,. /_ PUD Park GSdiod -� J \ it .� � '�••, .� r r ''; i�.,,..... ,... _.. �• _. �_ .<_ ,� 1 STrC y � �FfKo or O �� R fgkl fwCT �� Stephens City r` 0Po Q RIDGEFIEL-D-AVE—v O� ` m FAfRFAX p((ET� i I 0 Pp / ' . W n � O SITE LOCATION MAP J? GARDEN GATE DR � T CV JP �? Z U) W O -J 2 N �eR z ��Q C) I"t'y 7HC.y= UrZ.&Y � Z Z ape\ (\ 2 ZO O oe 1— N Q W1Q 0O W U `r 1 U) o r wAKEF/ELDC1 r m 0 N y C() Q = HAYVENNURST-CT �i _ d W Q N Z a r I � <w (D as l.J Portion of TM 85D-1-1.95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment = Z J >> _ Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 16DO02930 in Z O w r J W N Z J r 0 O aj Parcel Boundaryry Z O Z O i O O Stephens CRY Town Urrvts Z w O O Z VW Frederick County Zoning O w uJ R�r bz ,8-,,n,n Dmtnst)0. p o W R 7f o Feet / RP (Residential Performance D,stnct) J O W R O 500 RA (Rural Area D sthct) w ay " PROFFER a INS N. Guard Rail PROFFER 03 PROFFER / 4 wr r Sry1�� V -r•� � .� PROFFER a a FAIRFAX PIKE VA NII tA \ s PROFFER • 2 t D i J + HAVWNHURST C 1 1 7 K s T�IN�µ-�.�..�: - r,+I°'" . r4 ♦.. ..'"fir Legend y` . � r Parch Bovwx-. -� :-e• � Feet N.. IDU ROW �n+. H.. Pro," � r 'SC00 250 0 500 � •�.��. %'4" ,xrf t " '( 'ill, elwt.� (:NI a�f SOUTHERN HILLS • PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT REZONING AMENDMENT OPEOUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PROFFER G RE E N WAY DATE 20113�0630 PROJECT ID 3126 DESIGNED BY DWE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT ENGINEERING SCALE ina-WO1N1 RIDGE FIELD=AVE t w sin v GARDEN GATE-D r-- 3 = w Q N 04'6p W Z 0 Q LL I Z) �H°q fn W MSfDES WS < A 3 UDA J 1n RAC` J Q OUTSIDE S _ � ,r N'SA s UDA �vMr Z Z > 7 'es TS. .9 • ? N (n W S�oE . O S W • � H Q • ° • • e n Q. o 12 in. < V Q 2 u Le en (Z_n p N a < w o Portion of TM BSD-1.1-95 Subtect to Rezoning Amendment ec d o Q HAY) > III.ENHURST CT / 2 x M Public Street Reservation Area - Instrument No. 160002930 12 In. w F Z o Parcel Souridary = 0 Z Z w QQ W Stephens City Town Limes v w Z 3 i V O' $ Sews -Water Service Area (SWSA) �+ F W to 0 w g w p R Urban Dewsbprnent Area (UDA) y w w Feet i 0 - Water Line �= R _ Sews Line 400 0 400 w uw DMA Sew r..ena Ca ft 1• aS D.w�. 201e Dr %V w r 1 S. Dw= Ca y a rCSA. j k"zo+s {Ly ST/C � �• h0 \--ns / - y OGEFIEL•R•-AVE Z 7wJt''� " W z / W V J 1-7 Q~ o 15D GARDEN GATE DR— .1F' �G N lso W 1-- Q w LU C, _ Z:) LU J LL 750 4."ti''J~eLLI q�Ncy W 0 � JLU 0 \ / 0 !Y Q_ Z W Leaen Portion of TM 85D-1-1-95 Subtect to Rezoning Arnendment N Q Q = Publk Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 16DO02930 r w � y Q w LU O y Parcel Boundary = :D —1 j HAVVENHURST C7 •J a FG- a - y O Stephens City Town LimitsZ W r m ww w Pond or Lake J d < ~ 0 Im rn 4 z i zQ " Wetlands NWI w Z w i V 0 = 100 Vear Flppdplan j ON Q 0 W LL Stream 0 a w O ,Rp S2 a 9 Feet Q'J , 5 Foot Intermediate Contours w 00 tl 500 0 500 25 Fool Index Contours " )MF S~m F� CmM w GS DY—ii 2019 DM FEM Fold Map S—C,r INIp,-0—pwlp"ll US Fin � W.*% S.-- NMwI W~di, -.,A ry sr JW0215 JW0212 3 eFRr �OC(,Sr �P+ �Py SCALE 1�0• Stephens Run o� F 500 0P 000 2000FEI GOO y� S sr o 'k4gr / y°�eGC � �y y�MO ooG oR sr �°e0 B sM �lF°r ZONE A N $° p�°F c An qRc PANEL 0330D A`Sr CTf O°9 O m �Z ° J FAIRFAX PIKE m FIRM ITTMA T GREEN ST z FAIRF AX 1%ANNUAL CHANCE O� O FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP FLOOD DISCHARGE CONTAINED IN GLECNOAK T CULVERT �� FREDERICK COUNTY, Z m VIRGINIA MODTOP L" AND INCORPORATED AREAS e eRgyoy� PANEL 330 OF 375 oo°O� q "F RAVEN (SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT) CT O? 2 GRCOV eq,Q CONTAINS: ZONE X QJ 00� oR COMMUNITY NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX yQ� GA DEN �� FREDERICKCOUNTY 5t01163 0330 D Os�2 ~ GA E DR <iFMq� srePtleNs an, Tows+ OF stlxlfia 0330 o ,�.F, 11 Stephens Run =� ZONE X �J FgMq eRgN y °Ry�R °yCr THEATER LANE WAKEFIELD CT `�qy, Map Number shown below anould be "aiice to d when placing map p map orders'. the Community Number �• N ° y R shown above should be used on Insurance applications for the subject community, MAP NUMBER X � JW0218 OftA�`E� 51069CO330D HAYVENHURST CT !t Q OyGPO EFFECTIVE DATE W0221 VMITFIELDND Z CIR SEPTEMBER 2, 2009 wo222 $ °9y TOWN RUN ZONE A Federal Emergency Management Agency LANE PFACFA"O P(F" Sheep Run '40—E JOINS PANEL 0350 '41--E '420° E tns + r+ oast cagy a • perrton a the •Do.e rcreR.ced nood mw. rt wm exb•eted rrma Fatli oµ,ee. role map — not relied charges tie '39'"E fide a Fw lh Ie ite•�p dk't,rilprma m.D�pvtNW� aItR�Iiv e Proyam nood map check iM FEMA Flood Map Store •t wrw.m•c.r•m•.pw Legend Portion of TM 65D.1 1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendme PuDMc Street Reservation Area - Instrument No 1600029 -'arcel Boundary UStephens City Town Limis NRCS Soils M x BLAIRTON SILT LOAM. 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES 41C WEIKERT-BERKS CNANNERY SILT LOAMS, 7 TO 15 PERCENT SLOPES 41D-WEIKERT-BERKS CNANNERY SILT LOAMS. 15 TO 25 PERCENT SLOPES 41E-WEIKERT-BERKS CNANNERY SILT LOAMS, 25 TO 65 PERCENT SLOPES oR f t FARBRnnK ri4ANNF Rv SILT LOAM. 2 TO 7 PERCENT SLOPES M.i I.1. .... I:..i...,, — 1. .... Icy..— � .1—DAY /wAkl r if t li S O Z F O O w R r n w Lu Feet o FL g r 0 200 w \\ A 5 HAYVE N44URST CT �FAIRFAXPIKE o LINWOOD-CT O, Z J F W Mq I OOISIDE-CIR 00 o� o° 0P O� ID GEFIE4D-AVE O ti ,q 3®341209 Wise-Ritenour House _ Feet "�----�, t \30o 0 8100 ® 34-266 Gwrd Howe 4.i l .i. s-- F— C—ft � GS D.n.— NIr D.i. P`ANKWOO JCT Leatind Portico of TM 85D-1 1-95 Subject to Rezoning Amendment ® Public Street Reservation Area Instrument No 160002930 Parcel Boundary QStephens City Town Limits t Cemetery 0 Rural Landmark Civil War Battlefields ,..,a ai I,ieeh _ First Kwhstown Fist Winchester _ Second Ke nslown :i Second Winchester Stephensons Depot ' Third Winchester Q 64 Z — W W V N W IL Z Q Q w 2 Z W Z fn W D J Q Q = W LL x Z U 111 Z Er O O w U) O _ Tn 0 m H 0 N Q Z a N Q tzV) r � w w a o w Q j> Z r w w � : o Z 4 O V Z U Y w Ztr o Z 0 O Z g j N w0 O x a w a. N 0 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane l ounih,d in 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning - Revised Proffer Statement File No: 3216V Date: Fri, Sep 16, 2016 To: FC Planning From: Evan Wyatt Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Copied Rod Williams Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail n Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other Urgent 7 For Your Review As You Requested Please Comment Message I11 Candice, Please find attached the revised Proffer Statement that provides for your comments and Rod's comments. The revisions are identified in redline text to assist with your review. I have also included the Rezoning Plat Exhibit you requested; as well as the Residential Attributable Impacts Document that we discussed a few weeks ago for your information. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this information. Thank you, Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: � =1 J, SEP 1 6 2016 Plcasc Print name: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 August 3, 2016 Mr. Evan Wyatt Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 RE: Proposed Rezoning for Southern Hills — Phase II Property Identification Number (PIN): 85D-1-1-95 Dear Evan: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Southern Hills — Phase II property. This application seeks to rezone 40.36 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP Districts with revised proffers. Staff s review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Southern Frederick Area Plan. The site is within the limits of the Southern Frederick Area Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis is shown at 3.22 units per acre. While slightly lower than shown within tine plan, the density is relatively consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Monetary Contribution. Based on the changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the monetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed development, you will need to provide documentation from FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance zones where this development is located, as well as data from Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriffs Office on their respective service availabilities. Model figures for General Government and the Library are still appropriate. 3. Redline Proffers. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. 4. Proffer Statement. The introduction to the proffer does not reference the B2 zoning nor the acreage of B2/RP. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. Page 2 Mr. Evan Wyatt RE: Southern Hills August 3, 2016 5. Generalized Development Plan. This rezoning appears to omit the proffered generalized development plan that was proffered with the 2006 amendment. An updated GDP is recommended for this application that shows the property, proposed interparcel connections, road layout and the ROW dedication from proffer A2. 6. Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. 7. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments fi•om the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 8. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA Assistant Director CEP/pd PROFFER STATEMENT SOUTHERN HILLS — PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT Frederick County, Virginia Opequon Magisterial District Tax Map #85D-1-1-95 June 30, 2016 Revised September 15, 2016 Current Owner: Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Contact Person: Evan Wyatt, Director of Land Planning Greenway Engineering, Inc. 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-4185 ewyatt@greenwayeng.com Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 SINGLE-FAMILY LOT DEVELOPMENT PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, 1usiness General District with proffers to 37.79± acres ol' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of 132, Business General District with revised proffers PROPERTY: 40.36± acres (RP District 37.79± acres; B2 District 2.57± acres) Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95 (here -in after the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Arcadia Communities, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMI3 Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its Managing Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager (here -In alter the "Owner") APPLICANT: Greenway Engineering, Inc. PROJECT NAME: Southern Hills - Phase 2 Single -Family Lot Development ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: June 30, 2016 REVISION DATE: TBD September 15, 2016 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 1.5.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of' Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick COUnty Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the Undersigned Owner hereby proffers that In the event the Board of Supervisors of' Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # for the rezoning of a 40.36±-acre pertic>tr cal Tam 1141�p-I)rt el-84I-4-4— -95 parcel from the 37.79± acres of' RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of B2, Business General District with proi'1'ers to khe 37.79± acres of RP, Residential Performance District and 2.57± acres of' B2, Business General District with moclified proffers, development of the Property shall be clone in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and concitions may be SUbsequently amended or revised by the Owner and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these probers shall be cleemed withdrawn and have no Pile t13126V/IiAW Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be blllding L1p0I1 this Owller alld their- legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The Property, more particularly described as the lands owiicd by Arcadia Conn nllIlltleS, LLC a Virginia limited liability company; By: VMI3 Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager; By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, Its M111agillg Member; By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation, Its Manager being a portion of Tax Map Pal -cc] 85D- i -1-95, as evident by Instrument # 160002930, and further described by Boundary Line AdjusUnent Plat of the land of Arcadia Com11111111UCS, L.L.C., prepared by Greenway Engineering, dated February 23, 2016 (see attached Instrument #160002930 for Survey Plat). PROFFERED CONDITIONS A.) Land Use Restrictions I. The Owner hereby proffers to develop the RP, Residential Performance District portion of' the Property (approximately 37.79± acres) as Single-falllily detached residential lots. The Owner further proffers that there will be a maximum of 130 Single-family residential lots developed on the Property. 2. The Owner hereby proffers to ellcl.1111be1' the B2, BLISiiless General District portion of the Property (approximately 2.57± acres) as a reservation for a 100-foot wide future right-of-way, and will dedicate the right-of-way upon request by the County or VDOT, provided such request is made in writing prior to March 10, 210.5, as described in Instrument #160002930. The reservation shall be available for f'LlIhIlnlellt of Prof'Icr 10 of the Proffer Statement dated June 6, 2001, and revised January 31, 2007, approved as part of' Rezoning Number 22-06. B.) Ewing Family Cemetery The Owner hereby proffers to Set aside a separate lot for the Ewing Faillily Cemetery with access from a public street within the Property. Access from the public street to the Ewing Faillily Ceilletery lot shall be established via ail appropriate cascme11t that will be established as part of the Subdivision Design Plan and Final Subdivision Plat for the Property. The Ewing Family shall have maintenance responsibility for said casement. File 113126WHAW 2 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September IS, 2016 C.) Disclosure Statement A statement shall be added to the Final Subdivision Plat and Deed Covenants for all single-family detached Iesidential lots cleated on the Property advising that agricultural land uses exist to the south and to the east of the Property; that the Ewing Family Cemetel'y exists as a sepai'ate lot with access and casement within the Property; and that wastewater treatment facilities exist Or previously existed to the North of the Property. D.) Monetary Contribution The Owner hereby proffers to provide a total monetary contribution Of $1,139,120.00 to offset residential development impacts for the Property. The $1,139,120.00 value reflects the monetary contribution that was approved by Frederick County for the 232 townhouse lots entitled On the Property as part of Rezoning Application #22-06. The Owner proffers to include a narrative on the Subdivision Design Plan that identifies the monetary conti'1bUt1011 fOI' each single- family detached residential lot that equates to the total monetary contl'1btition Of $1,139,120.00 divided by the total 11t1111be1' of single-lallllly detached I'esldential lots. The Owner shall cause for the payment of the established IlloiletaI'y C011ti'IbUti011 f01' each single-family detached residential lot to the County pI'IOI' to the issuance of a Certificate Of' OCCUpancy Pei-mit IoI' each developed single- family detached dwelling unit within the Property. OWNER SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE I'i1e #3126V/IiAw 3 Greenway Engineering June 30, 2016 Arcadia Communities, L.L.C. Rezoning Revised September 15, 2016 Owner Signature, The conditions proffered above shall be binding Upon the heirs, CXCCUtors, administratoIs, assigns and SUCCCSSOI'S in the interest of the Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board Of SUjlel'VISOI'S grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Arcadia COn1111Unitics, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VM13 Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager By: Date Corn monweal Ili of Virginia, City/County Of To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this clay of 20_ by Notary Public My Commission Expires Idle #3126V/FAW 4 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) ,P-`�� ey �� �6 �0a / 16 1, �! SG0 QG 5 060 ,•/ o�L eye iy � o �1 50 / • �/, CEMETERY = �1 11 1 / / 0 / 1 o •� / II 0 of 6 0105ee 0 aI � 0 N k51 i' • �12 � I i I 100.62' I , TM 85D-1-1-95 �I1I Z�Z ZONE RP & B2 II �1 PROPERTY LINE ZONE RP = JZ 7925 ACRES J 1I HEREBY CREATED ZONE B2 = 2.5684 ACRES TOTAL = 40.3609 ACRES h IN I RESERVATION FOR I 100 FOOT WIDE ' FUTURE ROAD ill I RIGHT-OF-WAY o I I I III WESTCHESTER OR. h , cnl f�l 50'R/W =I'� o EX. TEMPORARY I 1 CUL-DE-SAC ESMT. A I I o INST. No. 060011588,,,, --- - ,,co 17 - 0 o EX. 20' SANITARY ,oLi -- �; EX. 20' SEWER ESMT I DRAINAGE ESMT INST. No. 060011588 J I INST. No. 060011588 N 2_7*32'43" E 527.10__-._._-_I I � I SOU ERN HILLS SUBDIVISIONrP SE l 100.05' INS'. No. 06001 1588 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 554.63' 92 90 89 - - - 94 93 _ _ -- =—=o- -- -- ----- -- -.. ------ _----- o 0 N 2849'10" E 801.32-----�-- LS------�------- TOWN RUN LANE — STATE RTE. 1012 VARIABLE WIDTH R/W ZONING PLAT EXHIBIT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNMES, LLC. (TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95) OPEQUON MGISTERML DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, KRGINIA SCALE. • 1 "--200' DATE, SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 '+ 1ND` j197J G R E E A WAY GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Wlncly Hill Lane Wlnellestel', flirginia 22602 l elephone: (540) 662-4185 EXX- (540) 722- 9528 3126 SHEET I OF 1 EXBT 9-15-16 ENGINEERING www.greeawayeng•e°m 97 151 Windy Hill Lane GREENWAY Winchester, VA 22602 ENGINEERING September 15, 2016 Frederick County Planning Department Attn: Candice Perkins, Deputy Director 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Southern Hills - Phase 2 Rezoning — Review Agencies Comment Response Letter Dear Candice: The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a comprehensive comment response letter that addresses the Southern Hills — Phase 2 Rezoning comments received from the various review agencies. The comprehensive comment response letter is structured to provide for the specific review agency, the date the comment was received, and information pertaining to each review comment. This information is intended to explain how specific comments have been addressed by the rezoning application or advise why the specific comment was not included in the proffered development program for the commercial redevelopment project. Frederick County fire Marshal — Comment dated July 5, 2016 •:• Rezoning np1)roved. Frederick County Sanitation Authority — Comment dated July 14, 2016 ❖ The rezoning application results in reduced denumds for FCSA services. It is acknowledged that the existing punch station is sized appropriately to accommodate the additional sewage flows front. Southern Hills Phase 2. FCSA services continue to be available to serve the subject property. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Frederick County Public Schools — Comment dated July 22, 2016 We recognize and appreciate the developer's willingness to maintain the total amount of previously proffered cash proffers of $1,139,120.00 even though the development's proposed impact on community facilities has decreased. This development proposal includes 130 single- family detached units and FCPS eslimates that this development will house 51 students (14 Engineers Surveyors Phuuiers finvironmental Scientists Laboratory Telephone 5,10-662-4185 1'ax 540-722-9528 www.greenwaycng.com Project #3126V/EAW high. school, 12 middle school and 25 elementary school). FCPS estimates $2,104,000.00 in one-time capital expenditures ($16,185.00 average per unit). A detailed assessment of the estimated impact, including attendance zone information is enclosed. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Public Schools Attributable Impacts. Frederick County Transportation — Conunent dated July 22, 2016 d• The Traffic hnpact Analysis should be fine to waive based on the impacts that are being presented. Frederick County Parks & Recreation — Comment dated July 26, 2016 It appears that the proposed nronelary contribution will not meet current Development Impact Model (DIM) levels. Parks and Recreation would like to see minimum levels met. COMMENT RESPONSE: The County Attorney has advised that new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Parks and Recreation Attributable Impacts. VDOT — Comment dated ,July 26, 2016 VDOT recommends that the Preliminary Matters section o/ the proffer statement be updated to r%rerr.ce the existing proffers associated with. rezonin.gs #01-01 and #22-06 as they relate to the undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of'the site. COMMENT RESPONSE: The undeveloped B2 commercial parcel north of the site is not a parcel that is part of the rezoning application as it is owned by another entity. Greenway Engineering will work With the County Attorney to determine the appropriate revisions (if any) to the proffer statement regarding this matter. Since proffers #9 and #10 of rezoning #22-06 will be connected to a property covered by a new set of proffers with the approval of this rezoning, VDOT recommends that proposed proffer A2 be updated to make the dedication, of the 100 foot wide fixture Warrior Drive right-of-ivay, as opposed to the reservation, a condition o/ site plan approval for the Southern Hills — Phase 2 residential development. Project #3126WEAW 2 COMMENT RESPONSE: A small portion of the B2 commercial area associated with RZ#22- 06 is a component of this project, which was acquired by the Property Owner to ensure that this acreage would be available as a right-of-way reservation for future dedication to Frederick County and/or VDOT should itbe needed in the future. The Owner has ensured that this reservation will be available through year 2105 as demonstrated in Instrument No. 160002930, which is included as information with the rezoning application. Therefore, this instrument provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through March 10, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. d• The 100' wide reservation. for future road right-of-way should extend up to Parcel #TM 85-A- 141. COMMENT RESPONSE: The Owner has prepared a plat and deed that reserves the 100' right-of-way across the portion of Southern Hills — Phase 1. This document, recorded as Instrument No. 160008765 is consistent with information in histrument No. 160002930 and provides assurance that the County and/or VDOT will have control of the 100' right-of-way through August 11, 2105 when either body deems this to be appropriate. Frederick County Planning — Comment dated August 3, 2016 The Southern. Frederick Area Plan identifies residentiol density at four tin -its per acre for this site. The proposed density is 3.22 units per acre, which is relatively consistent ivith the goals of the Canprehensive Plan. COMMENT RESPONSE: Agreed. Based oil changes to the state code, the monetary contribution as proposed is not appropriate. To establish that the nlonetary contribution addresses only impacts specifically attributable to the proposed developm.erlt, you will need to provide documentation from FCPS showing the current school capacities for the school attendance z017es where this development is located. As well as data from. Parks and Recreation, Fire and Rescue, and the Sheriff's Office on their respective service availabiliti.es. COMMENT RESPONSE: The FCPS review comment dated July 22, 2016 includes a School Facility Information Table that identifies the current school attendance zones and their capacities that are specific to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Development. Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Provide a copy of the 2006 proffers with redline to show the proposed changes. Project #3126V/EAW 3 COMMENT RESPONSE: A copy of the 2006 Proffer Statement with redline comments has been provided to identify proffer items carried forward, proffer items that have been modified, and proffer items that have been eliminated in conjunction with the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement. ❖ The lll.l!"Odllcll0ll to the proffer does not reference the B2 District zoning portion of the property, nor the acreage of the RP District and B2 District portions of the property. The proffer needs to delineate the acreage of each district and a zoning plat showing the limits of each district is also necessary. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reference both zoning districts and their respective acreages. A Zoning Plat Exhibit dated September 15, 2016 has been prepared that provides the acreage and limits within each zoning district. ❖ An updated Generalized Development Plan. is recommended for this application. COMMENT RESPONSE: Greenway Engineering met with the Planning Department and reviewed the draft Subdivision Design Plan that will be submitted subsequent to final rezoning approval. It was agreed that an updated Generalized Development Plan would not be necessary due to the simplicity of the single-family residential layout. Frederick County Public Works — Comment dated August 4, 2016 ❖ We have no comments concerning the proposed rezoning. Frederick County Attorney — Comment dated August 4, 2016 Consistent with the other references in. the Proffer Statement and with the particular provisions in the Proffer Statement, the descril)tion of the "REZONING" should also reference the B2 portion. of the properly. COMMENT RESPONSE: The September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. Section A2 of the Proffer Statement might be best if'it specifies that the Owner will dedicate the right-of-way upon. request by the County or VDOT provided that such request is made prior to March 10, 2105. Additionally, a sentence advising that the reservationshall be available for fulfillment of Proffer 10 of the Proffer Statement dated Jime 6, 2001 and revised January 31, 2007 approved as part of RZ #22-06 is recomlended to avoid confusionregarding enforcement of previous proffer commitments. Project H3126WEAW 4 COMMENT RESPONSE: Section A2 of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement has been revised to reflect the County Attorney's comment. ❖ Section D1 — new state law, effective July 1, 2016, requires that any proffer for transportation, public safety, schools, and/or parks must address an impact specifically attributable to the proposed residential development. The County will require substantiation that Proffer DI satisfies that requirement. COMMENT RESPONSE: Please refer to the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 that addresses Transportation, Public Safety, Public Schools, and Parks and Recreation impacts specific to this rezoning application. Winchester Regional Airport — Comment dated August 11, 2016 The proposed rezoning should not have an, impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport; however, the site does lie within the airport's airspace and residents could experience fly -over noise from aircraft. Please advise me if you have any questions regarding the information in this letter. Greenway Engineering will provide a copy of this letter, a copy of the September 15, 2016 Proffer Statement and a copy of the Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts Document dated September 15, 2016 to all applicable review agencies for information. Sincerely, (Ul Evan Wyatt, Dir?tor of Land Planningva yb Greenway Engineering, Inc. Cc: Arcadia Communities, LLC Project #3126V/EAW 5 Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning Residential Development Attributable Impacts 9/15/16 PURPOSE The purpose of' this document is to provide information specific to the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Proffer Statement dated June 30, 2016 that demonstrates attribUtablC impacts 1or the proposed 130 single-family detached residential lots. This document provides specific sections that identify residential attributable impacts for transportation, public safety, schools and paI'ks and recreation Services; as Well as the prollered conditions that address these impacts. PROJECT SUMMARY The Southern Hills Subdivision was Originally approved by Frederick County in 2001 for 250 SlIlgle-falllily dWClli1lg LII1itS Oil 105± acres located oil the east side OI Town Run Lane (Route 1012). The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved Wltll Specific development conditions and monetary contributions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #01-01, which i11CIUCled several Oft -site transportation improvements and a monetary contribution of $4,910.00 per residential lot. Subsequently, Frederick County approved Rezoning Application #22-06, which maintained single ('anlily lots Within Southern Hills -Phase I and modified the remainder o1' the project area to allow for 232 townhouse lots within Southern Hills —Phase 2 and t0 allow commercial zoning in the northern portion of the project identified as Southern Hills — Phase 3. The Southern Hills Subdivision was approved With specific development Conditions specific to the Proffer Statement filed with Rezoning Application #22-06, which inClucled the transportation improvements from Rczoillilg Application #01-01, the provision ofa 100' right-of- way area between the Phase 2 TOwrillOUses and the Phase 3 COIllillercial Land Bay t0 accommodate the future extension Oi' South Warrior Drive to the illtlll'C Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation, and a monetary contrlbUtlOil OI $4,910.00 per residential lot, totaling $1,139,120.00. Arcadia C0111111L1111tieS, LLC acClUll'Cd the Phase I Single -Family Section, the Phase 2 TOWnhOLISC Section, and approximately 2.6± acres of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay that is proposed to provide the 100' right-of-way area between the Phase 2 Townhouses and the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. Arcadia C011lll1LInities, LLC has SUbmltted a RezoniIlg Application and Prof I'er Statement elated June 30, 2016 I'or the portion of the Phase 2 TOW111101ISe Land Bay and the 2.6± acre portion of the Phase 3 Commercial Land Bay. This Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 Single -Family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 TOwnllOLlse lots, prOVIdeS IOC the 100' right-ol-Way area between the Phase 2 and Phase 3 Commercial Land Bays, and provides a $1,139, 120.00 monetary C011tribUtl011 that iS consistent with the monetary contribution ValuC I`or the 232 Townhouse lots approved under Rezoning Application #22-06. Residential AttribUtable Impacts DOCUment 1 September 15, 2016 TRANSPORTATION — ATTRII3UTAI3LE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. The following inforillation identifies the existing and proposed attributable impacts to transportation associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 7.5 ADT = 1,740 VPD Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family Detached x 9.5 ADT = 1,235 VPD Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction of' 505 VPD Tile proffered transportation improvements that were identified in Rezoning Application #01-01 and Rezoning Application #22-06 were determined to be appropriate to mitigate transportation impacts for the Southern Hills Subdivision. The proffered transportation improvements have been performed in advance Of residential (level opmen t activities, which include the following: Completion of the extension of Stickley Drive (IZoute 1085) to connect with Town Run Lane (IZoute 1012) to facilitate a new traffic pattern to Fairfax Pike (Route 277). i Installation Of gUardraiI along Town Run Lade (Route 1012) as approved and permitted by VDOT. i Completion 01new SL11-faCe material overlay of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) along the Southern Hills property frontage as approved and permitted by VDOT. Implementation of traffic signalization at the intersection of Fairfax Pike (IZoute 277) and Stickley Drive (Route 1085). Recordation of the reservation of the 100' right-of-way area for future public street dedication to VDOT and/or Frederick County. CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Iezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of' vehicle trips generated from the proffered single- family lots. The Southern Hills Subdivision has performed all proffered transportation improvements deeilled to be required to mitigate transportation impacts and has provided VDOT and Frederick County with the ability to obtain the 100' right-of-way area for future public street improvements to connect to the proposed Interstate 81 Exit 307 relocation. These facts demonstrate that the Southern Hills Phase-2 Rezoning Application has addressed attributable impacts specific to the proposed residential development. Residential Attributable Impacts Document 2 September 15, 2016 PUBLIC SAFETY — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots Cul-rently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maximum of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for public safety services is determined by the nUrnber Of persons regUlred to serve. The following information identifies the average nUlllber Of persons projected for townhouse and single family dwelling unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to public safety associated with this rezoning request: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/hollscllold':= 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size* = 409 persons Reduced Impacts: Proposed rezoning results in a reduction 01' 197 persons '``Persons Per Household (1'11-I) value determined from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document— Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census Bureau identifies average household size valuC of 2.58. ''"!`Average Family Size value determined f1-01-n US CCIISIIs Bllreall H011sellold and Families: 2010 Document — Households by Type Table (page 5). The 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan (CII') DOc11111C11t does not identify capital projects for the Sheriff's Office, nor does the CII' Document identify capital projects for the Stephens City Volunteer Fire and RCSCIIC Company, which is the first duC Conlpally for the Southern Hills —Phase 2 residential lots. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document provides budget information for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office and for the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document CIC11101IStratCS funding attributable to Frederick County, which a111oUntS t0 approximately 77% for both the Sheriff's Office and the Volunteer Fire Departments. The Budget Document provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for both departments. Operating Costs may ilICILICIC egUip111C11t Costs (but are 110t CXCILIS1VCIy CCIU1p►11C11t); therefore, Operating Costs funded by local contributions provides conservative valuation that can be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. SHERIFF'S OFFICE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $1,207,973.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $930,139.00 $930,139.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $1 1.18/person $1 1.18 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $35.10/SFD 11olISChOld $35.10 x 130 SFD = $4,563.67 allnllal impact $4,563.70 x 10 years* = $45,636.70 Residential Attributable Impacts Document 3 September 15, 2016 VOLUNTEER FIRE & RESCUE 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $834,419.00 x .77 (Local Funds) = $642,502.00 $642,502.00/83,199 (FC Population) = $7.72/person $7.72 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Sire) = $24.24/SFD household $24.24 x 130 SFD = $3,151.30 annual impact $3,151.30 x 10 years : _ $31,513.00 °10 years is the conservative build -Out 1101-iZOI1 for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction schedule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years lfor lot build -out. CONCLUSION: The Southern I-Iills-Phase 2 Rezoning Application Will result in a reduction of residential lots and will I'CSUIt in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The clu-rent Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) does not identify proposed projects that are relevant to the Sheriff's Office and the Stephens City VOIL1ntccr Fire and Rescue Company, nor does the CIP identify proposed capital projects in which the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will have attributable impacts towards. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCLImenl provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for Public Safety Services. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not Cxclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated With the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% Of annual Operating Costs over a 10-year period. This is a conservative valUation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build-OUt projection for the 130 Single-family lots; as well as the complete value of annual Operating Costs over the build -our period. PUBLIC SCHOOLS — ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -Of the 232 townhouse lots currently Cntitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 tOW11110lISC lots and provides for a maxlllll1111 Of 130 single-family detached residential lots. Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) utilizes the following student/household projects for Single-family lots and for tOW111101Ise lots as a basis for determining impacts to public schools: Single -Family Lots: Elementary Sehool = 0.19 students per IIOUSel101C1 Middle School = 0.09 students per household I-ligh School = 0.10 students per household Residential Attributable Impacts Document September 15, 2016 Townhouse Lots: Elementary School = 0.13 students per houselold Middle School = 0.07 Students per household High School = 0.07 students per household The SOLlthel-11 Hills —Phase 2 Development will result in a reduction of 6 Elementary School students; 5 Middle School students; and 3 High School students based On projections utilized by FCPS. FCPS provided information that states studcnls from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development will attend Bass-l-loover Elementary School, Robert E. Aylor Middle School, and Sherando High School. FCPS projects that there will be 25 Elementary School Students, 12 Middle School Students, and 14 High School Students from the 130 single-family lots Within Southern Hills — Phase 2. This information indicates that there is Sufficient capacity at Bass-l-loover Elementary School and Robert E. Aylor Middle School to accommodate the projected increase in students from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development; however, this information indicates that the capacity at Sherando High School is already exceeded by 118 students. FCPS has acquired property for a new high school that will provide for acceptable capacity for students utilizing the new facility and for students at Sherando I-Iigll Sellool once the new facility is open. FCPS has received funding for design services and anticipates opening the new high school facility in Fall 2019. CONCLUSION: FCPS has provided capital cost information for the new high school that assumes a price -per -student multiplier for the school capacity, which totals $53,27.5.00 per student. FCPS projects that the student generation fr0111 the SOLIt11C1'11 1-I111S—Phase 2 Development Will result in $746,000.00 of capital cost based on the price -per -Student multiplier. The Frederick County 2016- 2017 Annual Budget DOCLImCilt provides budget information for the School Debt Service (page 179), which accounts for all school projects in the COLlnty that have been fllllded tlll'ollgh bond revenues. This information does not provide sufficient information to determine attributable impacts to specific schools; therefore, the $746,000.00 projection for the price -per -Student multiplier for the new high school Will be Used fol' this analysis, which should be considered very conservative Since SlL1dCIAS from L11C SOLlthern Hills —Phase 2 Development will 110t UtillZe the 11CW high school facility. PARKS & RECREATION — ATTRI13UTABLE IMPACTS The Southern Hills Subdivision Rezoning Application and Proffer Statement proposes to develop 130 single-family lots within Phase 2 in -lieu -of the 232 townhouse lots currently entitled for the project. The proposed Rezoning Application Proffer Statement eliminates the allowance for 232 townhouse lots and provides for a maxin1u111 of 130 single -faintly detached residential lots. Attributable impacts from residential development for parks and recreation services is determined by the number of' persons required to serve. The following information identifies the average Residential Attributable Impacts Document 5 September 15, 2016 IlUmber of'persons projected for tOW1111OLIse and single Family dWC11111g Unit; as well as the existing and proposed attributable impacts to parks and recreatioil associated With this rezoning I'egLICSt: Existing Impacts: 232 Townhouses x 2.61 persons/hoLISC1101C1 = 606 persons Proposed Impacts: 130 Single -Family x 3.14 average family size' = 409 persons RCdLICed Impacts: Proposed reZ011illg I-CSLIltS in a redUCti011 Of 197 persons `Persons Per Household (PPI-I) value dCtermillCd from Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCumenl — Demographic Statistics Table (page 209). Note: US Census BureaLl identifies average household size value of 2.59. "'`Average Family Size va1Lle determined from US Census BureaLl 1-10LISellold and Families: 2010 DOCL1111CIlt — I-IOLiSehOlds by Type Table (page 5). The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOCUI11CIlt provides budget information for the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - Frederick County 2016-2017 (page 195). The Budget Document identifies that the CIP consists of a schedule for illajor Capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. Additionally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is strictly advisory and that it is possible particular projects may not be Funded during the year that it is indicated in the CIP. Finally, the Budget Document states that the CIP is Considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. The 2015-2016 CIP DOCUInCIlt provides a section entitled Project Funding (page 21), which identifies how capital projects are funded for various agencies and divisions. The CIP Document states that funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fluid balance of the COLInty. Additionally, the CIP Document adviSCS that the Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources 01' funding for projects not funded by the County. The Parks and Recreation Department identifies $71,648,000.00 in CIP projects that are to be funded by the COLulty during the 2015-2020 fiscal years. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document demonstrates funding attributable to Frederick County Parks and Recreation during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years for Clearbrook Park (page 150) and Sherando Park (page 151 ). Funding for the two regional parks iS achieved primarily from fees charged for LISC Of facilities and from local revenues. Local revenues for Clearbrook Park averaged $143,684.00 during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 fiscal years, While Slicrando Park averaged $267,347.00. The percentage of local revenues to fund Clearbrook Park averaged 36% and Sherando Park averaged 64%, With the remaining R111dirIg Coming from fees Charged for Use Of facilities. The Budget Document provides costs attributable to Personnel and Operating for Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park. Operating Costs may 1nCiLICIC CC1LIlpIllC1lt Costs (bLlt are I10t exCILISIVCIy egUipment); therefore, Operating Costs ILInded by local contrlbllti011S provides valLIatlon that call be considered for attributable impacts for residential development. It is more than likely that Residential Attributable Impacts Document 6 September 15, 2016 residents OI the SOIItI1Crn HilIS—Phase 2 project will utilize SheraIldo Park based oil the proximity of the regional park to this project. However, the residential attributable impacts have been considered for both regional parks for the purpose of this analysis, which provides conservative valuation for attributable impacts associated with this project. SHERANDO PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $243,123.00 x .64 (Local Funds)'` = $155,598.72 $155,598.72/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.87/person $1.87 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $5.87/SFD household $5.87 x 130 SFD = $763.10 annual impact $763.10 x 10 years'` = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PARK 2016/2017 Operating Costs: $234,843.00 x .36 (Local Fun(Is)" = $84,543.48 $84,543.48/83,199 (FC Population) = $1.02/person $1.02 x 3.14 (SFD Average Family Size) = $3.20/SFD household $3.20 x 130 SFD = $416.00 allilual impact $416.00 x 10 years'` = $4,160.00 '`10 years is the conservative build -out horizon for the 130 single-family lots. A normal construction Sc]1Cdule of 4-5 lots per quarter results in 16-20 lots per year, which would require 6- 8 years for lot build -out. SHERANDO PAIZK ATTIZIi3UTA13LE IMPACT = $7,631.00 CLEARBROOK PARK ATTIZI13UTABLE IMPACT = $4,160.00 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION ATTIZI13UTABLE IMPACT = $1 1,791.00 CONCLUSION: The Southern Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application will result in a reduction of residential lots and will result in a reduction of total persons generated from the proffered single- family lots. The current Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Document does not identify capital projects that were demonstrated for funding during the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Fiscal year budgets. Additionally, the CIP identifies that funding for Parks and Recreation Department capital projects will come from the unreserved fund balance Of the County. The Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget DOcllillCut provides a basis to determine potential local revenues to fund Operating Costs for the Clearbrook Regional Park and the Sherando Regional Park. Operating Costs may include equipment costs, although the total value of operating costs is not exclusively for capital costs. The attributable impact associated with the 130 single-family lots proposed by the Southern Residential AttribUtablC Impacts DOCUmCnt 7 September 15, 2016 Hills -Phase 2 Rezoning Application accounts for a per -person value for 100% of aIlnual OperatiIlg Costs over a 10-year period for both Clearbrook Regional Park and Sherando Regional Park. This is a conservative valuation for attributable impacts as this represents a longer than average build - out projection for the 130 single-family lots; as WCII as t11C complete Value Of annual OperatlIlg Costs over the build -out period. SOUTHERN HILLS —PHASE 2 CAPITAL FACILITIES ATTRIBUTABLE IMPACTS The information in this CIOCUment has been developed to determine attributable impacts from the Southern Hills —Phase 2 Development to demonstrate that the $1,139,120.00 monetary contribution identified in Section D. Monetary Contributions Of the .Tulle 30, 2016 Proffer Statement is appropriate. The following information is provided from the various sections of this dOCilment: Transportation Impacts: NONE (all prollered transportation improvements complete) Public Safety Impacts: $ 77,149.70 Total Public Schools Impacts: $746,000.00 Total Parks & Recreation Impacts: $ 1 1,791.00 Total Total Impacts: Monetary Contribution Attachments $834,940.70 Total $1,139,120.00 Total (+ $304,179.30) Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit 6-30-16 •3 Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan DOCUment Excerpts Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables •:• US Census Bureau Household and Families Document Residential Attributable Impacts Document 8 September 15, 2016 Transportation Proffer Compliance Exhibit PROFFER / 3 INSET Guard RaN Guard RaN PROFFER f 4 PROFFER • S PROFFER ## PROFFER 0 2 Legends �► Puce) 13—do, . N.w tar ROW L— ` ,�� Feet - N.w AOp" Lk.. A tooROW L- * e • C 500 250 0 500 °Y � I� I SOUTHERN HILLS • PHASE 2 SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 ` REZONING AMENDMENT TRANSPORTATION PROFFER COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT REZONING AMENDMENT OPEOUON MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT r'•I'�� FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA TRANSPORTATION PROFFER DATE 201&0&30 PROJECT ID 3126 DESIGNED BY DWE COMPLIANCE EXHIBIT COMPLIANCE SCALE I ..h-500I..I ENGINEERING Frederick County 2016-2017 Annual Budget Document Excerpts Sheriff Volunteer Fire Departments Ambulance & Rescue Service Public Safety Contributions Juvenile Court Probation Inspections Fire and Rescue Public Safety Communications PUBLIC SAFETY Inspections 4% Juvenile Court Probation 0% Public Safety 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $11,610,858 $11,644,337 $11,644,337 $402,822 3.58% 987,582 895,305 895,305 52,745 6.26% 395,029 395,200 395,200 0 0.00% 5,302,908 5,513,558 5,513,558 45,633 0.83% 149,981 146,835 146,835 5,055 3.57% 1,122,692 1,151,981 1,151,981 61,964 5.68% 8,266,034 9,829,763 9,829,763 1,957,774 24.87% 1,235,238 1,417,841 1,417,841 57,520 4.23% $29,070,322 $30,994,820 $30,994,820 $2,583,513 9.09% Public Safety Contributions 18% Sheriff ,.. 37% Volunteer Fire Departments 3% Ambulance & Rescue Service 1% County of Frederick, VA FY 2016 - 2017 SHERIFF 3102 DESCRIPTION: The Frederick County Shcrifrs Office is comprised of four divisions: Patrol, Administrative Services, Investigative, and Court Security/Civil Process. "file Patrol Division is responsible for answering calls for service, initial investigations of criminal complaints, and patrolling the streets and highways for traffic violations. Additionally, each shifl is responsible for business checks, serving warrants, responding to alarms, handling Detention Orders, Protective Orders, and preparing cases and presenting evidence in Court. The Traffic Unit is one of the fastest growing units within the Patrol Division. "file number of traffic complaints, accident investigations, and citations issued continues to increase as the community continues to grow. Originally the intent for this unit was to supplement the Virginia State Police in handling the number of complaints dealing with traffic. Since the inception of the traffic unit, this office has become the primary agency for dealing with traffic complaints. The traffic unit also handles special traffic complaints reported to the Sheriff's office and coordinates and establishes special details such as DUI checkpoints and scatbelt safety checkpoints. The Administrative Services Division is responsible for the School Resource Officers and the Animal Control Officers. This division also maintains the Sheriffs Office accreditation and provides community services such as Neighborhood Watch, Project Watch, and Project Lifesaver. The Sheriff's Office Emergency Response Team is also part of the Administrative Services Division. The Investigation Division handles all major felony cases and the more serious and violent misdemeanor cases, in addition to special investigations into drugs, gangs, child pornography, child sexual abuse, child physical abuse, white collar crime, computer crimes, and fraud. The Court Security/Civil Process division is responsible for providing security for the Frederick County Courts. This division is also responsible for serving all civil papers within Frederick County and handling prisoner extraditions and prisoner transports. GOALS: • Provide the citizens of Frederick County the best services possible by providing community relations through deputies performing a variety of duties, to include Sheriff's Kid Camp, the D.A.R.E. program, Neighborhood Watch meetings, Project Lifesaver, VIN Etching, Elder Assistance Programs, and Child Fingerprinting. • Continue to upgrade law enforcement equipment with more modem equipment such as TASERS, :Less than Lethal Weapons and other alternatives to deadly force while keeping the safety of our personnel and the public as our 1/1 priority. • Continue working relationships with outside agencies that request our services. • Continue efforts to recruit and hire quality personnel. • Continue to maintain the Virginia Law Enforccmcnt Accreditation Standards. • Provide School Resource Officers (SRO) for as many schools as possible. • Train and utilize a Bloodhound for search and rescue and fugitive location. PERFORMANCE INDICATORS: FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 Actual Projected Projected Law Enforcement Calls for Service 71,132 62,722 58,144 it of Warrants Served 7,585 7,640 7,622 # of Criminal Arrests 4,116 3,935 3,879 # of Citations Issued 5,733 4,526 3,797 # of Cases Reported 5,536 6,593 6,436 # of Civil Papers Served 18,694 18,057 17,701 # of Extraditions/Transports 398 448 467 BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2017 FY 2016 FY 2016 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % Costs: Personnel 9,796,034 10,480,064 10,207,584 11,128,561 648,497 6.19% Operating 1,212,599 1,152,948 981,587 1,207,973 55,025 4.77% Capital/Leases 602,225 11,325 647,835 11429 104 0.92% 12,347,963 703,626 6.04% TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 Revenue: Fees 574,534 447,045 578,347 432,745 -14,300 -3.20% State/Federal 2,677,122 2,352,154 2,657,125 2,388,421 36,267 1.54% Local 8,359,202 8,845,138 8,601,534 9,526,797 681,659 7.71% 12,347,963 703,626 6.04% TOTAL 11,610,858 11,644,337 11,837,006 Full -titre Positions 126.5 133.5 133.5 1 L___139.5]6 4.49% County of Frederick, VA 110 FY 2016 - 2017 VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS 3202 DESCRIPTION: The purpose of this expenditure activity is to provide contributions to the eleven volunteer fire companies which serve Frederick County. The contribution is used by the fire company to support their mission of providing fire protection to the residents of their service area. Each volunteer company provides an annual financial statement to the county as evidence of expenses incurred. The governing body of the county recognizes the invaluable contributions made to the community by our volunteer fire companies. GOALS: * Provide fair and accurate contributions to the county fire departments. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Costs: Personnel 73,676 73,676 66,308 Operating 913,906 821,629 1,031,745 Capital/Leases 0 0 0 TOTAL 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 Revenue: Fees 0 0 0 State/Federal 273,993 220,000 214,535 Local 713,589 675,305 883,518 TOTAL 987,582 895,305 1,098,053 Full-time Positions 0 0 0 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Budget Amount % 73,676 0 0.00% 834,419 12,790 1.56% 0 0 0.00% 908,095 12,790 1.43% 0 0 0.00% 210,000 -10,000 -4.55% 698,095 22,790 3.37% 908,095 12,790 1.43% 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA FY 2016 - 2017 Parks & Rec. — Admin. Parks Maintenance Recreation Centers Clearbrook Park Sherando Park Regional Library PARKS, RECREATION & CULTURAL Sheran 7' Clearbrook 6% Parks, Recreation & Cultural 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $607,026 $1,035,835 $707,341 -$328,494 -31.71% 1,570,785 1,042,120 1,062,790 20,670 1.98% 1,562,265 2,107,290 2,707,142 599,852 28.47% 387,821 434,999 388,922 -46,077 -10.59% 434,821 409,482 410,398 916 0.22% 862,665 862,665 942,357 79,692 9.24% $5,425,383 $5,892,391 $6 218 950 $326,559 5.54% Rrainnnl T.ihrnry Parks & Rec. - Admin. iintenance 7% County of Frederick, VA 145 FY 2016 - 2017 CLEARBROOK PARK 7109 DESCRIPTION: The Clearbrook Park budget contains all the necessary funds to maintain the 55 acre Clearbrook Park, three Neighborhood parks, two Frederick County Public Schools (FCPS) high schools, two FCPS middle schools, seven FCPS elementary schools, two additional FCPS building grounds, and the Old Frederick County Courthouse lawn. GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted Actual Bud et Budget Budget Costs: Personnel 129,562 154,243 156,576 149,429 Operating 234,958 280,756 231,683 234,843 Capital/Leases 23,301 0 44,739 4,650 388,922 TOTAL 387,821 434,999 432,998 Revenue: Fees 212,064 336,100 375,708 232,528 State/Federal 0 0 0 0 Local 175,757 98,899 57,290 156,394 388,922 TOTAL 387,821 434,999 432,998 Full-time Positions 0 0 0 1 0 Increase/Decrease FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Amount % -4,814 -3.12% -45,913-16.35% 4,650 100.00% -46,077-10.59% -103,572-30.82% 0 0.00% 57,495 58.14% -46,077-10.59% 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 150 FY 2016 - 2017 SHERANDO PARK DESCRIPTION: The Sherando Park budget contains all the necessary funds to maintain the 334 acre Sherando Park and the grounds at one Frederick County Public Schools (FOPS) high school, two FCPS middle schools, five FCPS elementary schools, Frederick County Public Safety Building, and Warrior Drive Right -Of -Way. GOALS: • Provide tools and equipment necessary to effectively and efficiently do the job. • Enhance customer service. • Environmental stewardship. BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees State/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions 7110 FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016 App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Budget Amount % 156,777 160,387 143,376 160,275 -112 -0.07% 214,053 249,095 144,382 243,123 -5,972 -2.40% 63,991 0 38,721 7,000 7,000 100.00% 434,821 409,482 326,479 410,398 916 0.22% 127,887 157,700 177,959 167,072 9,372 5.94% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 306,934 251,782 148,520 243,326 -8,456 -3.36% 434,821 409,482 326,479 410,398 916 0.22% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 151 FY2016-2017 Instruction Admin./Attendance & Health Pupil Transportation Operation & Maintenance Facilities Technology School Debt Service Transfers School Nutrition Services School Textbook Private Purpose Funds School Capital Fund NREP Operating Fund NREP Textbook Fund Consolidated Services SCHOOLFUNDS Schools 2015 Actual 2016 Budget 2017 Adopted Budget Increase (Decrease) FY 2016 to FY 2017 Amount % $100,338,683 $113,461,369 $116,910,372 $3,449,003 3.04% 5,648,324 6,387,423 6,771,401 383,978 6.01% 8,275,541 8,698,744 8,767,835 69,091 0.79% 11,862,433 12,842,221 13,423,274 581,053 4.52% 171,708 204,412 206,887 2,475 1.21% 5,638,600 5,965,019 6,565,886 600,867 10.07% 13,999,653 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 425,797 469,739 565,345 95,606 20.35% 4,443,951 6,626,934 6,669,757 42,823 0.65% 906,097 1,900,544 2,666,452 765,908 40.30% 15,308 75,000 75,000 0 0.00% 1,136,445 500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 500.00% 4,290,687 5,259,238 5,346,744 87,506 1.66% 11,644 40,000 50,000 10,000 25.00% 2,898,133 3,600,000 3,600,000 0 0.00% $160,063,004 $181,267,128 $191,065,242 $9,798,114 5.41 % Private Purpose, 0.0% NREP, 2.8% School Nutrition Services,^ 3.5% \ School Textbook, 1.4% School Debt Service, 8.6% Technology, 3.4% 6'. Facilities, 0.1% Operation & Maint., 7.0%� Pupil Transportation, 4.6% Admin./Attendance & Health, 3.5% Consolidated Services, 1.9% School Capital, 1.6% Transfers, 0.3% Instruction, 61.2% County of Frederick, VA 179 FY 2016 - 2017 SCHOOL DEBT SERVICE DESCRIPTION: Whenever extensive building programs are developed by the school board and loans through bonds and the Virginia Literary Fund are procured, it is necessary to set up a schedule of repayment over a twenty year period. The finds in this category include principal and interest for Virginia Public School Authority Bonds, Virginia Literary Fund payments and principal and interest for interim financing as required. An additional cost included in this budget are fees for handling bonds and fees charged for investing VPSA bond proceeds. Increased finding from the County Board of Supervisors is required due to scheduled financing repayments on the construction of the replacement Frederick County Middle School. GOALS: • To repay the money borrowed through bond issuance and literary loans over a twenty year period. BUDGET SUMMARY: Costs: Personnel Operating Capital/Leases TOTAL Revenue: Fees State/Federal Local TOTAL Full-time Positions FY 2016 FY 2016 FY 2017 Increase/Decrease FY 2015 Approved Estimated Adopted FY 2016App. To FY 2017 Actual Budget Budget Bud et Amount % 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0 0 0.00% 15,537,146 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% 275,783 337,043 337,043 370,524 33,481 9.93% 14,626,151 14,899,442 14,899,442 16,075,765 1,176,323 7.90% 14,901,934 15,236,485 15,236,485 16,446,289 1,209,804 7.94% 0 0 0 0 0 0.00% County of Frederick, VA 187 FY 2016 - 2017 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY 2016-2017 The Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local planning commission. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP consists of a separate document that was adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 25, 2015. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plan as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan, Frederick County approved the 2030 Comprehensive Plan on July 3, 2011. The Capital Improvements Plan is strictly advisory. It is possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The CIP is considered the first step towards the project, while the budget is considered the last obstacle before construction. Transportation projects are included in the CIP. The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. Impact of the Capital Program on the Operating Budget: The Capital Program has three direct impacts on the Operating Budget. The primary impact is in the Debt Service accounts. The greatest part of the county's capital improvement costs have been funded through the issuance of General Obligation Bonds, which generally are repaid over a period of twenty years. The only debt of this nature is funding for the construction of schools. The second impact of the Capital Program upon the Operating Budget is in the Cash Capital account. Cash Capital is the appropriation of General Fund monies to fund capital improvement projects. Financing capital projects on a pay-as-you-go basis minimizes the need for issuing bonds and substantially reduces current and future debt service costs. The third and final impact of the CIP on the Operating Budget arises when the CIP project is completed and the county must operate and maintain the new facility. In some instances, the costs re absorbed within the current budget of the department(s) providing the service. In other instances, such as the opening of a new school, direct operating and maintenance costs, as well as increases in the staff must be budgeted on an ongoing basis. The Capital hmprovements Plan developed by the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee is presented on the following page. NOTE: The FY 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan is the most recent Board approved CIP at time of print of this document. The CIP process is currently under review in order to make it more relevant, useful, and accurate. County of Frederick, VA 195 FY 2016 - 2017 Frederick County, Virginia Additional Miscellaneous[Demographic Statistics Demographic Profile) Percent Value Frederick County, Virginia Virginia USA Frederick County, Virginia Virginia USA Demographics Population -- -- -- 83,199 8,382,993 321,418,820 Population Annual Average Growth- 1.8% 1.0% 0.8% 1,328 80,589 2,590,222 Median Age" -- -- -- 39.1 37.5 37.2 Under 18 Years 25.1% 23.2% 24.0% 19,675 1,853,677 74,181,467 18 to 24 Years 7.9% 10.0% 9.9% 6,179 802,099 30,672,088 25 to 34 Years 11.7% 13.6% 13.3% 9,183 1,090,419 41,063,948 35 to 44 Years 14.6% 13.9% 13.3% 11,431 1,108,928 41,070,606 45 to 54 Years 16.0% 15.2% 14.6% 12,558 1,214,000 45,006,716 55 to 64 Years 1 1.9% 11.9% 1 1.8% 9,325 954,964 36,482,729 65 to 74 Years 7.5% 6.9% 7.0% 5,859 549,804 21,713,429 75 Years and Over 5.2% 5.3% 6.0% 4,095 427,133 18,554,555 Race: White 89.3% 68.6% 72.4% 69,934 5,486,852 223,553,265 Race: Black or African American 4.1% 19.4% 12.6% 3,175 1,551,399 38,929,319 Race: American Indian/Alaska Native 0.3% 0.4% 09% 234 29,225 2,932,248 Race: Asian 1.2% 5.5% 4.8% 969 439,890 14,674,252 Race: Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 0.0% 1 0.1% 0.2% 34 5,980 540,013 Race: Some Other Race 3.0% 3.2% 6.2% 2,379 254,278 19,107,368 Race: Two or More Races 2.0% 2.9% 2.9% 1,580 233,400 9,009,073 Hispanic or Latino (of any race) 6.6% 7.9% 16.3% 5,168 631,825 50,477,594 Economic Labor Force Participation Rate and Size (civilian population 16 years and over)" 67.2% 64.8% 63.5% 42,542 4,229,948 157,940,014 Armed Forces Labor Force 0.1% 1.7% 0.4% 79 108,658 1,025,497 Veterans, Age 18-64 9.0% 9.1% 5.8% 4,449 470,379 11,371,344 Median Household hncome 3.4-- -- -- $68,719 564,792 $53,482 Poverty Level (of all people)' 5.9% 1 1.5% 15.6% 4,641 914,237 47,755,606 Mean Commute Time (minutes)' -- -- -- 30.0 27.8 25.7 Commute via Public Transportation' 0.3% 4.5% 5.1% 118 178,442 7,157,671 Union Membership' 3.4% 4.7% 11.1% -- -- -- Housin y Total Housing Units' -- -- -- 31,877 3,403,241 132,741,033 Median House Value (of owner -occupied units -- -- -- 5223,300 $243,500 S 175,700 Homeowner Vacancy 2.5% 1.8% 2.1% 579 37,033 1,591,421 Rental Vacancy" 3.2% 6.4% 6.9% 220 71,372 3,105,361 Renter -Occupied Housing Units % of Occupied Units)" 22.3% 33.3% 35.6% 6,502 1,013,466 41,423,632 Occupied Housing Units w/no Vehicle Available (% of Occupied Units4 3 8% 6.4% 9.l% 1,116 194,153 10,594,153 Social No High School Diploma (cducational attainment, age 25-64)'l 10 7% 9.9% 12.0% 4,652 439,874 19,939,890 High School Graduate (educational attainment, age 25- 64)4 28 9% 23.9% 26.5% 12,534 1,062,241 44,000,387 Some College, No Degree (educational attainment, age 25-64)4 21.7% 20.6% 21.9% 9,437 914,402 36,270,359 Associate's Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 ' 8.2% 7.7% 8.7% 3,571 342,942 14,487,486 Bachelor's Degree (educational attainment, a e 25-64 19.3% 22.3% 19.7% 8,386 991,434 32,646,533 Postgrad Degree educational attainment, age 25-64 1 1.1 % 15.5% 1 1.2% 4,836 689,184 18,533,513 Enrolled in Grade 12 % of o ulation 1.7% 1.3% 1.4% 1,344 107,840 4,443,768 Disabled, Age 18-64 10.0% 9.1% 10.2% 4,895 460,216 19,703,061 Foreign Born4 5.8% 11.6% 13.1% 4,657 948,484 41,056,885 Source: l„t„ru''- I. Census 2010, unless wherwlse noted 2. Census 2015. annual average growth rate since 2005 3. Median values for certain aggregate regions (i.c. MSAs) may be estinuucd as wcighkd averages of median values from composing counties 4. ACS 2010-2014 5. 2014; Current Population survey, unionsmts.com, and Chmura; county -and rip -level data County of Frederick, VA 209 FY 2016 - 2017 Frederick County 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan Document Excerpts THE CIP TABLE CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Department Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contribution- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs- The cost for each project, including county allocations and other fiinding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in the 2015-2016 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project cost to the county of $1,015,369,550. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come fi•om the unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not fielded by the county. 0 Airport projects will be fielded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. • The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be independently undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal fields, developer contributions, and revenue sharing. 21 County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Ensuing Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ Public Schools Elementary School #12 S1,600,000 S30,800,000 S32,400,000 $32,400,000 Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation Robert E. Aylor Middle School $1,400,000 $10,730,000 $8,970,000 $9,900,000 $31,000,000 $31,000,000 Addition and Renovation Fourth High School S1,700,000 S35,500,000 S32,200,000 S19,400,000 S3,100,000 $91,900,000 $91,900,000 James Wood High School Renov. (Prior to FY2015-2016 Cost) TBD TBD Sherando High School Parking Lot & Softball Field Improvements TBD TBD Dowell J. Howard Center Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Phase 2 Renovation $8,900,000 S8,900,000 $8,900,000 Bass Hoover Elementary Phase 2 Renovation $9,000,000 $9,000,000 S9,000,000 CountylSchool Board Administration Building TBD TBD Indian Hollow Elementary Addition and Renovation TBD TBD Elementary School #13 $24.700,000 S24,700,000 $24,700,000 Fifth Middle School $49,500,000 $49,500.000 $49.500.000 $4.700.000 $77,030.000 S41,170,000 $29.300,000 SO S92,100,000 $247,400,000 $247,400,000 Parks & Recreation Clearbrook & Sherando Water Slide/Spray Ground $1,352,000 $1,352,000 $1,352,000 Sherando Access Road w/Parkingrrrails $1,567,000 $1,567,000 $1,567,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility S480,000 $14,683,000 $15,163,000 $15,163,000 Snowden Bridge Park Development $3,161,000 $3,161,000 $3,161,000 Sherando Softball Complex S682,000 $682,000 $682,000 Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $85,000 $148,000 $2,702,000 $2,935,000 $2,935,000 Sherando Lake/Trails/Parking-2Fields $103,000 S1,281,000 S1,384,000 $1.384,000 Community Parks (3) $6,352,000 $6,352,000 S6,352,000 Neighborhood Parks (3) $2,285,000 $2,285,000 S2,285,000 District Parks (4) S15,717,000 $15,717,000 $15,717.000 Sherando Picnic Areas $813,000 $818,000 $818,000 Indoor Ice Rink $6.102.000 $6,102,000 $6,102,000 Community Center $8,952.000 $8,952,000 $8,952,000 Clearbrook Open Play Areas $487,000 $487,000 $487,000 Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade 51,300,000 $1,300.000 S1,300,000 Soccer/Multi Use Fields $1,141,000 $1.141.000 $1,141,000 Clearbrook Tennis/Basketball Complex $535,000 $535,000 $535,D00 Sherando Skateboard Park $522,000 $522,000 $522,000 Clearbrook Shelter Stage $517,000 $517,000 $517,000 Fleet Trip Vehicles $295,000 S295,000 $295.000 County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Sherando Maintenance Compound $381,000 S381,000 $381,000 S6,645,000 S24,253,000 S35,572,000 $3,985,000 $1,193,000 SO $71,648,000 $71,648,000 Regional Library Gainesboro Library S155,023 S1,465,736 $128,275 $1,749,034 $1,749,034 Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD Route 522 South LibraryBranch TBD TBD SO S155,023 S1,465,736 S128,275 SO $0 $1,749,034 S1,749,034 Transportation Funded Priorities 1-81 Exit 310 Improvements $49,121,000 $49,121,000 E $49,121,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and SafetyImprovements (ph 1) S36,082,000 $36,082,000 E $36,082,000 East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over 81 $6,000,000 S6,000,000 E S6,000,000 Unfunded Priorities Route 37 Engineering & ConstrucCior S300,000,000 $300,000,000 E S300,000,000 1-81 Exit 307 Relocation $60,000,000 S60,000,000 E $60,000,000 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 2) $15,000,000 S15,000,000 E $15,000,000 Redbud Road Realignment $2,500,000 $2,500,000 E $2,500,000 Warrior Drive Extension $23,200,000 $23,200,000 E $23,200,000 Channing Drive Extension $20,600,000 $20,600,000 E $20,600,000 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign. $3,000.000 $3.000,000 E S3,000,000 Widening of Route 11 North $47,800.000 $47,800,000 E S47,800,000 Senseny Road Widening $22,800.000 $22,800,000 E S22,800,000 Invedee Way $10,200,000 $10,200,000 E $10,200,000 Fox Drive $250,000 $250,000 E $250,000 Rennaisance Drive $2,000,000 $2,000,000 E $2,000,000 Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD TBD $300,000,000 $0 $0 SO $0 $298,553,000 $598,553,000 S598,553,000 Winchester Airport New General Avaiation Terminal $380,000 S2,600,000 A,B $2,980,000 Northside Connector $1,250,000 A,B $1,250,000 New Terminal Parking Lot S650,000 A,B $650,000 Land Parcel64-A-66 $275,000 A,B $275.000 Land Parcel 64-A-67 S275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-33A $175.000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-60 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-40 $175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-64 $275,000 A,B $275,000 Fuel Storage Facility $1,000,000 A,B S1,000,000 Land Parcel64B-A-47 $300,000 A,B $300,000 Land Parcel 64-A-49 $300,000 A,B $300.000 Land Parcel 64-A-50 $300,000 A,B $3001000 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 1 $235,0001 1 1 1 A,B $235,000 County Total Project Department Priority County Contribution Per Fiscal Year Contributions Notes Costs Projects 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020+ Land Parcel 64B-A-52 $300,000 A,B S300,000 Land Parcel 64-A-59 $300,000 A,B $300,000 North Side Svc Road $400.000 A,B $400,000 Taxiway "A" Relocation S200,000 $4,650,000 $4,800,000 A,B $9,650,000 $2,660,000 $1,655,000 $3,250.000 S2,100,000 $4,650,000 $4,800,000 so S19,115,000 County Administration Clearbrook Convenience Site $20,000 $357,850 $377,850 E $377,850 Albin Convenience Site $24,000 $418,850 $442,850 $442,850 Relocation[Expansion Gore Site S24,000 $325,550 $349,550 $349,550 General Government Capital Expert $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 County/School Board Administration Building BD TBD E TBD Joint Judicial Center Renovation / New Facility $4,065,500 $20,000,000 $24,065,500 E $24,065,500 $4,285,500 $581,850 S642,850 $525,550 $200,000 $20,000,000 $26,235,750 $26,235,750 Fire & Rescue Fire & Rescue Station #22 (277) $400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 F&R Station #22 (277) Apparatus $100,000 $805,000 $905,000 $905,000 Fire & Rescue Station #23 $550,000 $2,150,000 $1,000,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 Regional Training Center S75,000 $100,000 $1,250,000 $10,000,000 S9,500,000 $10,250,000 $31,175,000 $31,175,000 Fire & Rescue Station #24 (Gainesboro) $250.000 $3,500,000 S3,750,000 C $3,750.000 Station #13 (Clearbrook) Relocation S33,000 $88,000 S4,275,000 $4,396,000 E S4,396,000 $608,000 $3,293,0001 S12,675,000 $11.000,000 $9,500,000 $10.250,000 47,326,000 S47,326,000 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 ' See Fire & Rescue Company Requests (<$100K) $550.000 Apparatus Ventilation System for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $550.000 C $550,000 $550,000 Office and Living Quarters for Greenwood Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $550,000 C $550,000 $100,000 Life Pack x3 for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $100,000 C $100,000 $800,000 Rescue Engine Replacement for Middletown Vol. Fire & Rescue Co. $800,000 C $800,000 $342.766 North Mountain Fire & Rescue Co.Building Expansion S342,766 C S342,766 S2,542,766 $200.000 $200,000 $200,000 S200,000 so S3,342,766 $3,342,766 Total I S321,441.2661 S107,167,873 $94,975,586 S47,238,825 $15,743,000 S425 703.0001 $996,2547550 $1,015,369,550 `Fire & Rescue Company Capita! Equipment Requests (<S100K) None $0 A- Partial funding from VA Dept. of Avlation N/A- Not Availablo 8- Partial funding from FAA TBD" To be Detennlnod C- Partial funding from pnvale donaJons D- Funding goes beyond displayed 5 years E- Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sourcos F- Funding initiated prior to displayed 5 yeara Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Tables Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Multifamily Mobile Home/Other Totals School Cost Program Capacity Per Student Cost Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Southern Hills Phase II July 22, 2016 Student Generation Housing Units;# 130 0 0 0 130 Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Elementary School Student Generation 25 0 0 0 25 Capital Costs Middle School Student Generation 12 0 0 0 12 High School Student Generation 14 0 0 0 14 Total Student Generation 51 0 0 0 51 Elementary Middle School High School School Cost Cost Cost Total Capital (2016-21 CIP) (2016-21 CIP) (2016-21 CIP) Costs $24,700,000 $49,500,000 $91,900,000 850 940 1,725 529,059 552,660 553,275 25 12 14 `5726,000 $632,000 $746,000 $2.104.000 $16,185 Annual Operational Costs FY 2016 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2016 Total Student Annual Budget) Generation Impact This Development's Impact on FOPS Operational Costs $11,584 51 $591,000 Average Annual Operational Cost Per Unit ea .dA School Facility Information Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) 2016-17 School Attendance Zone" Bass -Hoover R.E. Aylor Sherando June 3, 2016 Student Enrollment 619 594 1,518 2016-17 Program Capacity 656 850 1,400 - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. # - Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. n US Census Bureau Household and Families Document Table 2. Households by 'Fype: 2000 and 2010 Mnr infnrmntinn nn rnnfirlpnttality nrntprtlnn- nnnsamnlino errors. and definitions, see www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/doc/sfl.pd� Household type 2000 2010 Change, 2000 to 2010 Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total households .................... 105,480,101 100.0 116,716,292 100.0 11,236,191 10.7 Family household .......................... 71,787,347 68.1 77,538,296 66.4 5,750,949 8.0 Husband -wife households ................. 54,493,232 51.7 56,510,377 48.4 2,017,145 3.7 With own children ...................... 24,835,505 23.5 23,588,268 20.2 -1,247,237 -5.0 Without own children ................... 29,657,727 28.1 32,922,109 28.2 3,264,382 11.0 Female householder, no spouse present...... 12,900,103 12.2 15,250,349 13.1 2,350,246 18.2 With own children ...................... 7,561,874 7.2 8,365,912 7.2 804,038 10.6 Without own children ................... 5,338,229 5.1 6,884,437 5.9 1,546,208 29.0 Male householder, no spouse present........ 4,394,012 4.2 5,777,570 5.0 1,383,558 31.5 With own children ...................... 2,190,989 2.1 2,789,424 2.4 598,435 27.3 Without own children ................... 2,203,023 2.1 2,988,146 2.6 785,123 35.6 Nonfamily households ...................... 33,692,754 31.9 39,177,996 33.6 5,485,242 16.3 Male householder ....................... 15,556,103 14.7 18,459,253 15.8 2,903,150 18.7 Living alone .......................... 11,779,106 11.2 13,906,294 11.9 2,127,188 18.1 Not living alone ........................ 3,776,997 3.6 4,552,959 3.9 775,962 20.5 Female householder ..................... 18,136,651 17.2 20,718,743 17.8 2,582,092 14.2 Living alone .......................... 15,450,969 14.6 17.298,615 14.8 1,847,646 12.0 Not living alone ........................ 2,685,682 2.5 3,420,128 2.9 734,446 27.3 Unmarried couple households' ............... 5,475,768 5.2 7,744,711 6.6 2,268,943 41.4 Opposite -sex partners .................... 4,881,377 4.6 6,842,714 5.9 1,961,337 40.2 Same -sex partners' Summary File 1 counts ................. 594,391 0.6 901,997 0.8 307,606 51.8 Preferred estimates .................... 358,390 0.3 646,464 0.6 288,074 80.4 Average household size .................... 2.59 N 2.58 N - 0.01 (X) Average family size ........................ 3.14 N 3.14 N 0.00 K (X) Not applicable. I Unmarried couple households can be family or nonfamlly households depending on the relationship of others in the household to the householder. In this table, it is the sum of opposite -sex partners and same -sex partners from Summary File 1 counts. F Summary File 1 counts In this table are consistent with Summary File 1 counts shown In American FactFinder. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2000 Summary File 1 and 2010 Census Summary File 1. average household size decreased over the decade, from 2.59 to 2.58, but average family size stayed the same, 3.14.1 These indicators show a slowing of the downward trends that have existed since the end of the Baby Boom in the 1 960s. In 1960, the average house- hold size was 3.29 people per 6 Average family size is the number of family members in the household (persons related to the householder including the householder) per family household. This computation excludes persons not related to the householder. household, and the average family size was 3.65 people per family.' The number of households within each category type increased in the last 10 years, including husband - wife households, which increased ' Average household size for 1960 may be found in Frank Hobbs and Nicole Stoops, "Demographic Trends in the 20th Century," Census 2000 Special Reports, CENSR-4 (November 2002), Figure 5-3. Average family size for 1960 may be found in U.S. Census Bureau, 1960 Census of Population, Supplementary Reports, PC(SI)-38, Families in the United States: 1960, Table 280. by 2.0 million. Figure 2 shows that, despite this increase, in 2010 less than half of all households (48 per- cent) were husband -wife house- holds, down from 52 percent in 2000 and 55 percent in 1990. This is the first time that husband -wife families fell below 50 percent of all households in the United States since data on families were first U.S. Census Bureau REDU NL REv151 oNS 10 PaPFC'02� TO Vgyq o N STgMr-C l jlic- ► S CAfiLC] IE D Foa W MLb I mews rn oo i Fl eb i?EM-S Eu M IriF r-T -- - IN N 6143 Pt2t�f{�.2 DAI c"-D q I IS 116 PROFFER STATEMENT Southern Ililly Subdivision Rezoning: Rezoning Application No. 22-06. Rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) (90 acres) and 132 Commercial (15.54 acres). Proper See Attachment A for Property Identification Nos. (Opequon Magisterial District) Record Owner: Arcadia Development Co.; Arcadia -Southern Hills, L.L.C.; Southern Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. Applicant: Arcadia Development Co. Project Name: Southern Hills Original Date of Proffers: June 6, 2001 Revision Date: January 31, 2007 Preliminary Matters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 et. scq. of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and the applicable provisions of the Frederick County 7.oning Ordinance with respect to conditional rezoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia shall approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06 for the rezoning of 105.54 acres from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP) [90 acres] and B2 Commercial [ 15.54 acres] with revised proffers, development of the subject property shall be done in confonnity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such tenns and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever and all proffers currently in effect on the subject property as of the date this document was executed by the applicant shall continue in firll force and effect. These proffers shall be binding on the applicant and its legal successors and assigns. Monetary Contribution to Offset impact of Development he undersigned, who owns the above -described property, hereby voluntarily proffers that if the Board of Supervisors for the County of Frederick, Virginia approves the rezoning for the approximately 105 acres, with frontage along Town Run Lane in the ED1 Opequon Magisterial District of Frederick County, Virginia from Residential Performance (RP) to Residential Performance (RP)190 acres] and B2 Commercial [ 15.54 LUMP SUn acres], the undersigned will pay to Frederick County at the time a building permit is a plied for and issued the sum of $4,910.00 per residential lot. of $1,1Y111 .0� CZ32-ra X This monetary proffer provides for $3,581.00 for Frederick County Schools; $598.00 for Frederick County Parks and Recreation; $446.00 for Frederick County Fire and Rescue; $105.00 for Public Library; $59.00 for Sheriff's Officc and $121.00 for Administration Building. No CrDP Should the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia approve Rezoning Application No. 22-06, then in such event clevelopmcnt of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the attached voluntarily -proffered revised Generalized Development Plan including the following improvements: A:.. 4� 1.� On the 90 acres to be zoned RP no more than 88 single-family detached urban residence units and no more than 232 townhouse units shall be constructed. The 130 5FD balance of the property zoned B2 commercial shall he developed in accordance 4 with the uses specified in the B2 comnicrcial zoning district. The development of the public street network shall be in general conformance with the revised Generalized Development Plan datcc Octo')er. 2006. La) 0itK cam PLel 5 j REMtw�ID FQAPJ p io EA66Me r "Sou AIVD w ,Tµ P%W< 1; Ror+aco 1F4Ar1 f9i"Fo-N Stickley Drive (SR 1085) shall be extended as shown to connect with Town Ruil Lane (SR 1012) during the first phase of development (A to B). Town Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be ovcrlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface from B to C. Guard rail shall be installed right and left along Town Run Lane "Gil" areas greater than 7' vertical. Tfic improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Penmmit to be issued at the time of work. This work shall be done prior to the issuance of the 501h building permit. XTown Run Lane (SR 1012) shall be overlaycd with a bituminous concrete surface from C to D during the phase where the entrance at "D" is constructed. These improvements are to be further described by a VDOT Permit to be issued at the time of the work. An easement sliall be established 75' in depth along the South property line E to F. This easement will be prominently shown on the final plat and will restrict construction of homes as well as limiting the clear cutting of trees larger than 4" diameter. [This proffer was fulfilled and recorded on the Southern Hills Subdivision Phase I Final Subdivision Plat, bmstr unent No.060011588.] 6. A statement shall be added to the plat and covenants for all lots created by this project advising that agricultural uses exist on the South and East, the Ewing g� • Family cemetery exists within the limits of development, and wastewater treatment facilities exist or previously existed to the North of this site. 7. The Fwing Family cemetery will be set aside as a separate lot with public access via an appropriate easetncnt(s) and conveyed, if possible, to the Ewing family with covenants for future maurtcnance by the F.%t•ing family. XA contribution of 100,000 for construction funding shall be made at the time VDOT implements the construction of a stoplight at the intersection of Stickley AZ. Drive and Rte. 277. [This proffcr was fulfilled on March 3, 2005] '�� The Property Owner agrees to dedicate the right-of-way as shown on the revised i14STQUWW94T- N0. Generalized Development Plan for the future Warrior Drive extension (tile (VOo0 Z930 p,4b ,road") across that portion of the Owner's property zoned B2 Commercial in the location depicted on the Generalized Development Plan. The Property Owner IN51-12AW eve Mo • agrees to dedicate the right-of-way for the road within ninety (90) days of a V000ib't V$ paAN,oC written request by the County, provided that Rezoning Application No. 22-06 has b d b th F de ' ,k Co rt Bonrd of Su ervisors and sill a licable too r R'� eery approve y e re nc ut y p pp appeal periods have expired and no appeal has been filed. The Owner's ` 12ESCO-1vo 1 • dedication of the right-of-way for :he road is further conditioned on the following: (a) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall contain language, as a NOTM: IN9�� covenant running with the land, granting the Owner the right, at any time in the future and at Owner's expense, to place underground utilities across, or parallel No. I GOINI q30 is to, the dedicated right-of-way for the road (including, but not limited to, gas, FAftf- OF NE-3 electric, cable, telephone, stone sewer, sanitary sewer, and waterline); (b) the deed dedicating the tight -of -way shall contain, language, as a covenant running Q-cZoNwitw F*t- with the land, requiring that the road shall have, at the Owner's discretion, a -rMt e6b-1-1 -95; minimum of two entrances from the north side of Warrior Drive into the Owner's proposed commercial development, which two entrances shall meet applicable 1 NI'Tc.tJAtaji- Np, VDOT and County regulations and entrance spacing standards and be engineered into the design of the road, %vith turning, lanes as required, for the full 6000 VI(.15 1 S development of the subject property, during the design phase of the road; and Pea- PHOK - :L requiring that the Owner and/or its designated representative(s) be entitled to meaningfully participate in the design of the road as regards the location and �Pter1 design of the two entrances; and (c) the deed dedicating the right-of-way shall Aa�7► No"f-T contain language, as a covenant n►nning with the land, granting the Owner, its OF Q.E2./*1i�1� successors and assigns, the right at any time(s) in the future, to establish and locate construction and/or grading easements over and across the dedicated right- of-way in locations determined by the Owner, its successors and assigns, to be necessary for the development of the B2 Commercial property and/or the Residential Performance (RP) property provided that, upon construction of the road as a public street accepted into the state highway system by VDOT, the language regarding easements contained in this subparagraph 9 (c) shall thereupon be considered void. TM # �5—q^i38 10. wrier agrees that no greater than ten percent (10%) of the 676,885 maximum allowable commercial square footage in the T12 zone shall be constructed before the portion of the Warrior Drive extension road traversing Owner's property is N f! Z constructed. }� Owner agrees to limit residential building permits on the Property to a maximum REf�� of seventy-five (75) pen -nits per year, on a calendar basis commencing January 1, 2007, provided however that any unissued (bat otherwise allowable) yearly IJO COrQ o" permits will accumulate to Owner's benefit for subsequent years. For example, paLml.tt''S p"F05M if Owner pulls only 50 building, permits in 2007, Owner shall be entitled to 100 permits in 2008; should Owner pull only 50 permits in 2008, Owner shall be entitled to 125 permits in 2009. Residential building permits issues prior to January 1, 2007 are not to be considered a part of this proffer. The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the Applicant and Owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants said rezoning and accepts these conditions, the proffered conditions shall supersede all previous proffered conditions applicable to the Property and shall apply to the Property rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully submitted, ARCADIA DEVELOPMENT CO. Property Owner By: Its: ill 7� Date:_ ARCADIA-SOUTHERN IIILLS. L.L.C. Prop Owner Its: Date:Jilt Lrl SOU" [TERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATlON, INC. Its: kW Date: 4 N07 c=i fC,jJt�2;330 CD 0 CD VXT CORDAnON COVER SIRE'r TYPE OF INST'RUMFNT: DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND RESERVATION i DATE OF INSTRUMENT: MA 2C 1-1 10 2016 NAMES OF GRANTORS: 1) ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. 2) ''ILSTE INC TRUSTEE NAMES OF GRANTEES: 1) ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. 2) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FRFDF.RICK COUNTY, VIRG_MI A COUNTY/MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WI-IERE PROPERTY LOCATED: FREDERICK COUNTY/OPEQUON DISTRICT DESCRIPTION OF PIZOPFRTY: BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF SOUTHERN HILLS, PHASE 1, LOT 95 ('AX PARCEL 85D-I-1-95) i AND RESIDUE TAX PARCEL NUMBER 85-A-138 j INSTRUMENTS WHERE PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED/ACQUIRED: INST. No. 060011588 (SOUTHERN HILLS PLAT) INST. NO. 060013883 (SOUTHERN HILL DEED) INST. NO. 120013745 (PARCEL 138) INST. NO. 120013746 (LOT 95) INST. NO. 150010366 (NA,,1E CHANGE/CONVFRSION) PLAT ATTACHED: PLAT NUMBER 3126 AND 0517B, PREPARED BY GRFENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. TAX MAP PARCEL NOS.: 85-A-138 (RESIDUE PARCEL) 85D-1-1-95 (LOT 95) TOWN FILE NO.: BLA 16-03 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: CULBERT & SCIIMITT, PLLC 30-C Catoctin Circle, S.H. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 (12407.007)'IED BOX 99 I TINS DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND RESERVATION (the. "Deed") is made this J GGi'h day of 2016, by and between ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company, formerly known as Arcadia Communities, Inc. (referred to heroin as the "Owner"), Grantor and Grantee; TRSTE, INC., TRUSTEE (referred to heroin as the "Trustee"), Grantor; N'VF.LLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, Beneficiary (referred to herein as the "Beneficiary"); and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA, a body corporate and politic (referred to herein as the "County"), Grantee. RECITALS: A. The Owner is the owner and proprietor of certain real property located in Frederick County, Virginia, identified as Tax Map Parcel 85-A-138 ("Parcel 13811) and Tax Map Parcel 85D- 1-1-95 ("Lot 95) (Parcel 138 and Lot 95 are.sometimes collectively referred to lnerchn as the "Property"), as shown on that certain plat number 3126 and 0517B, dated February 23, 2016, entitled "Boundary Line Adjustment on the Land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., (Tax Parcels 85-A-138 and 85D-1-195)," and prepared by Grecnway Engineering, Inc., of Winchester, Virginia, certified land surveyors (the "Plat"), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; the Owner having acquired the Property by deeds recorded as Instrument Number 120013745 and Inshunnent Number 120013746, and as modified by ntmnc conversion recorded as instrument Number 150010366, among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia (the "Land Records"). 2 0 CD 0 ry CD 0 CD cw B. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to reconfigure and adjust the common boundary lines bchvecn Parcel 138 and Lot 95, said boundary line adjustment being more particularly shown on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. C.. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to create and establish a reservation for future public street dedication over and across the Property, in the location more particularly bounded and described on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. D. The Property is subject to the lien of a certain Credit Line Deed of Trust With Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated October20, 2015, and recorded as Instrument Number 150010369, among the Lund Record, as [maybe amended, modified, supplemented and/or restated from time to time (die "Deed of Trust"), wherein the Property was conveyed unto the Trustee, in trust, to secure a certain indebtedness, as more specifically set forth therein. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUS AIENT OF PARCEL 138 AND LOT 95 NOW TIIF.RRFORI? WITNT'SSETH, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Owner, as the owner of Parcel 138 and Lot 95, does hereby reconfigure and adjust the common boundary lines between Parcel 138 and Lot 95, in the locations shown on the Plat as "Property Line Hereby Created" and deleting the existing boundary lines in the locations shown on the Plat as "Property Lines Hereby Vacated," thereby creating New Parcel 138 (New TM 85-A-138), containing of approximately 11.8556 Acres of land, and New Lot 95 (New TM 85D-1-1-95), containing of approximately 40.3609 Acres of land, as more particularly bounded and described on the Plat. The lots and parcels hereby reconfigure and 3 C) 0 0 .F- boundary lute adjusted are adjacent to and contiguous with one another, having been acquired by the Owner, as set forth hereinabove. The Properly hereby boundary line adjusted, as shown on the Plat, is subject to all recorded casements, conditions, restrictions, and agreements that lawfully apply to all or any such part thereof. PUBLIC STREET It1SERVA'1'ION THIS DEED FURTUER WTINESSETI-I, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are.hcreby acknowledged, the Owner hereby reserves for future public street dedication to the County and/or the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") that certain area shown and depicted on the aforesaid flat as "Reservation For 100 Foot Wide Future Right- of-way" (the "Reservation Area"), This reservation for future public street dedication is hereby tended to a period of eighty-nine (89) years from the date of recordation of this instrument. The Owner, its successors and assigns in interest, shall dedicate to the County and/or VDOT for public street purposes, at no public cost to the grantee thereof, all or portions of the Reservation Area upon the request of the County and/or VDOT at any time during said eighty-nine (89) year period. TRUSTEE'S CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION TIHS DELI) FUR'1'l lElt W ITNESSETII, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand.paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the "Trustee, as I authorized to act by the Beneficiary, as shown by its execution hereto, does hereby (i) consent to the boundary line adjustment of the Property, as shown on the Plat and (ii) subordinate the said lien of the Deed of Trust to the foregoing reservation for public street purposes. 4 1 i i CD 0 cn STATUTORY COMPLIANCE The platting of the land and adjustment of the boundary lines provided by this instrument is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the Owner and the Trustee, and in accordance with the provisions of Virginia Code Section 15.2-2264, and applicable regulations of Frederick County, Virginia, as evidenced by the approval of said boundary line adjustment by authorized officials of Frederick County, Virginia, as noted on the attached Plat. MISCELLANEOUS Headings used in this Deed are for convenience purposes only and are not intended to affect the express terms herein set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Deed of to be executed, under -sea], by their duly authorized representatives. FURTHER WITNESS the following signatures and seals. [SIGNATURES ARE ON SUCCEEDING PAGES] 0 0 0 M ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings III, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Iis Manager Will -so �6 STATL'/COMMON WEALTH OF V I iKJ i A CITY/COUNTY OF FA I ZLE6 )I. > to wit: I, the vildersigu Notary Public, in and for th tju isdietiofraforesaid, do hc/ rebyeeitify that LI�QIf(�Q.(�LL l law rofVan Metre Financial Associates, Inc., as Manager of VM Holdings Ill, L.L.C., as Managing Member of VM73 Investments, L.L.C., as Sole Member and Manager of ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this Ichay of (.(_! , 2016. My commission expires: 1t 4,tf.bli�c Notary Registration No.: L lU Puhllc CommonweamYeaith of Vlrpinla 7049698 My Commisslon Explres Dec 31, 2018 -o 0 CD 0 TRUSTP.E: TRSTE, INC., TRUSTEE, a Virginia corporation By: (SEAL) Name: Title: o President STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF �GLL1�5 to wit: 1, the undo ned Notary Public, in and for the juri�diq�' aforesaid, do hereby certify that TRSTE, INC, TRUSTEE, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this _da of 2016. My commission expires: _. N P lio Notary Registration No.:��� y111111111// \a•JACOe"I,,. J��ttry PuoiOff': 0� 7 CO Q C7 OD BF,NF.FICIARY: WBLLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national barking association, Beneficiary By: (SEAL) 8M C. son Name:—�YF��� Titlo: STATE/COMMONWEALTH QQF _f"C15 CITY/COIJNTY OF G_jT ,.to wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the jurisdicti aforesaid, do hereby certify that (02 ISM\ as 1/. of WELTS FAR60 BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Beneficiary, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before rno find personally ncknowledged the sarrre in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my band and seal this _G ( ' day of M6y-6 \ 2016. My commission expires: %'q /) Notary Yn rc Notary Registration No.: BOUNDARY UNE ADJUSNENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCA X4 C " C. MAX PARCELS 8 -A-13B and OPEOUON WGWER/AL DISTRICT. FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRG/NIA FEBRUARY 23 2016 1 VICINITY MAP 1" = 1200' D I 9 dU T ~ q STICKLEY DR. G` J? z PLENTYALN. i TOWN RUN LANE — RTE. I 4 1012 Stephens City 1-81 1 OWNER'S CERTIFICATE THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND /N ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS, AND TRUSTEES, IF ANY. ARC401ACo,\4A4UNI &S,CL"C",Cr VI�Inla )Irnliecl IIQbi �" 11 CvAPK Ay�'ay' VM(3 1 lQrr�bt I 1 Qocu ,00- Ilmti ftj i,(1-bi IIt v Ccrn � , fts SbQ01 li oO `_)I N F:,S , L L -C. Q V 126, I tJ 1A 1 j iry'� CA ANAC, IN(, NEMr3C=Ye, 63 , VAIQ' ti`,E-V- F+ hN L ASSGC.WcES.it� 1�J12G,Iniil�C�2P�lLraitorJl ITSM^1,JA(,CO3 S3 r' COMMONWEALTH OF V/RGINIA 6-' () _ CITY / COUNTY OF FA I TO WIT• (� �-- THE FOREGOING OWNERS CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED LYDIC BEFORE ME TI1/S DAY OF �IriP i 20 Public . th of Virginia BY 698! ;L;AURAL. pMDMY COMMISSION EXPIRES 206 REGISTRATION No. C� S N TARY 0 SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAND CONTAINED /N THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT 1S ALL OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 6, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT No. 120013745 AND A PORTION OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 6, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT No. 12001J746, AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGIN14 REGARDING THE PLATTING OF SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE COUNTY HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. ERNEST S. fVWORTH, L.S. ADATE PARENT TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION T.M. 85-A-138 51.9269 ACRES ZONES: RP, 82 USE. VACANT T.M. 85D-1-1-95 0.2896 ACRES ZONE: RP USE.- VACANT APPROVAL: �ALTH O�,G `pia s,6 ��i FREDERICK COUNTY S DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR DATE RNEST S. HO TH y Lic. No. 1837 LL ���0 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane tEAY Vv Winchester, ginia 22602 SuR Telephone: (540) 662-4185 GR FAX.- (540) 722-9528 rJ126 SHEET 1 OF 7 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com BLA 16-03 ORIGINAL T.M. 85—A-138 51.9269 ACRES ORIGINAL T.M. 85D-1-1-95 0.2896 ACRES (LOT 95 SOUTHERN HILLS PH. I) TOTAL 52,2165 ACRES NEW TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 . 11.8556 ACRES NEW TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95 40.3609 ACRES TOTAL 52.2165 ACRES = CENTERLINE gw= RIGHT—OF—WAY = EXISTING ESMT. = EASEMENT INST. No. = INSTRUMENT NUMBER TM = TAX MAP BRL = BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE PER ZONING ORDINANCE NO 1. THE BOUNDARY AND ACREAGE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON PLATS OF RECORD AND FIELD SURVEYS PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM. 2. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. 3. TITLE TO TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 IS VESTED IN ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 120013745. TITLE TO TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95 (LOT 95 OF SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION PHASE I AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 060011588) IS VESTED IN ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 120013746. ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. IS SUCCESSOR TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, INC. BY CONVERSION AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 150010366. 4. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON LIES WITHIN 7.0NE A: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAS) SUBJECT TO INONDAT70N BY THE 12" ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED AND ZONE X. AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.27 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN PER NF.I.P. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 51069C0330D, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. THE APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SAID ZONE A ARE DEPICTED HEREON AS DETERMINED BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING OF THE REFERENCED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. 5. TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 HAS THE REMAINS OF A HOUSE, A BARN AND VARIOUS FARM RELATED OUT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES. ALL OF THESE ARE ABANDONED AND IN RUINS. 6. BUILDING SETBACK RESTRIC7IONS FOR B2 ZONING ARE FRONT — 50' ON PRIMARY/A7FRIAL HIGHWAYS, 35' ON COLLECTOR/MINOR STREETS SIDE & REAR — NONE BUILDING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS FOR RP ZONING ARE BASED ON THE CLASSIFICATION OF HOUSING TYPES WHICH ARE DETERMINED DURING SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. THE ENTIRETY OF THE 100 FOOT RESERVATION FOR FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY IS BUILDING RESTRICTED. Z ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE TO THE LAND RECORDS OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERKS OFFICE. BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT LTH p OF THE LAND OF �A F p ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, LLC. {TAX PARM-S 85-A-1S8 and 85D-1-1-95) NEST H R OPEQUON MGISTERML DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGIN14 SCALE, N/A DATE. • FEBRUARY 23, 2016 Lic. No. 1837 � 1. GRHrEAWAYENGINEERING, INC )<L�x 151 Windy Hill Lane Fnv »r Winchester, Virginia 22602 YeleFhone: (540) 662-4185 GREE WAY FAX: (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 2 OF 7 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.corn BLA 16-03 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N 27*32'43' £ 10.05' L2 N 62'27'17" W 50.00' L3 N 59' 13 09" W 142.23' L4 N 61'10'50" W 145.04' L5 N 2732'43" E 95, 43' L6 N 29'00'04' E 164,02' L7 S 61'09'46" E 15.28' L8 N 28'50'14' E 37.14' L9 S 35'39'41 '•' W 129.60' LID S 47'23'14" W 111.61' L l l S 06'2 1'59" W 148.29' L 12 S 06'21 59' W 399.78' L 13 S 1938'51 " E 235.49' L 14 S 00' 13'48" W 269.38' L 15 S 02'53'17" E 75.12' L 16 S 08'45 :49' W 280.04'. L 17 S 03'25'04 " E 104.05' L18 S 88'35'13" W 339.65' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH TANGENT Cl 2824.79' 102.03' 2'04' 10" N 2952' 19' E 102.03' 51.02' C2 2450.00' 603.61 ' 14'06'58" N 70'03'58' W 602.09' 303.34' C3 2550.00' 639.66' 14'22 21 ' S 70' 11 39" E 637.98I 321.52' BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCALM COMMUNITIES, LLC. (TAJC PARCEI-S 85-A-M and 85D-1-1-9 ) OPEQUON MGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINIA SCALE.- N/A DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 751 Windy Hill Lane m 1971 Winchesim; Wiginla 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4.185 GREE WAY FAX: (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www.greemvayeng.com OF ;NEST S. HQ M Lic. No.//1837 3126 SHEET 3 OF 7 BLA 16-03 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) 85 '1 / CEMETERY 5 ��� e ti��tip� �p00 z V pf 6 ZE 1 100.62' cn 4 Z� NEW TM 85D-1-1-95 t 1 40.3609 ACRES ZONE RP & B2 PROPERTY LINE HEREBY CREATED jJ ` RESERVAAON FOR �* ' 100 FOOT WIDE h' 1 FUTURE ROAD J RIGHT-OF-WAY 3� J 1 ORIGINAL TM 85-A-138 0 1 WESTCHESTER DR. ,n a 1 Qtj �n EX. TEMPORARY �t CUL-DE-SAC ESMT. INST. No. 060011588�i��� o EX. 20' SANITARY I Q 1L 1 K EX. 20' SEWER ESMT. �-` / INST. No. 060011568 `D R' DliNNAGE ESMT. y I I s� INST. No. 060011588 N 27;3243" E 527.1 D_—_ J ` I PROPERTY ONES Sul E7 ,q CLf �OTVi J JP P IAS�! o— IN No. 6001 568 U 100.05' HEREBY VACATED S 554 63' LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 4.90 89 __ - -_---- -------_ 94 93 92 91 _ N 28'49'10" E 801.32'— ---moo L5 - — - - -------- ORIGINAL TOWN RUN LANE - STATE RTE. 1012 TM 85D-1-1-95 VARIABLE WIDTH RIOW BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF OF �p,Z,TH A f� ARCAD64 COA& WRES, LLC. (TAX PARCELS 85-A-M and 8M-1-1-915) OPEOUON MGISTERML DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRUNM S a Lic. N . 1837 �yr��r151 kt SCALE.- 1--200' 1 DATE.- FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. Windy Hill Lane URQ Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 0517B SHEET 4 OF 7 GREENWAY FAX. (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com BLA 16-03 • 0 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) -� 9 I/ Q a 6 � 0� oo 0 6 00 5 / / 1 TM 85—A-141 FREDERICK—WINCHESTER 7 ` SERVICE AUTHORITY j/ i DR 608 PG 671 L9 0 100.62' TH 85—A-142A /D TOWN of NEW TM 85D-1-1-95 STEPHENS CITY o 0 40.3609 ACRES DB 700 PG 273 m1 m ZONE RP & B2 /' 1 PROPERTY LINE HEREBY CREATED 'TM l NE4W 85-A-138 N , 4 1.8556 ACRES I , RESERVATION FOR ZONE B2 100 FOOT WIDE I FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY •N // I / o-- ORIGINAL TM 85-A-138 N o o f EX. 20' SANITARYo o ^' SEWER ESK o0 = o INST. No. 060011587 3to I I ro� o „� EX. 20' z DRAINAGE ESMT ZE e INST. No. 060011588 0 ul PROPERTY LINES �" 100.05' HEREBY VACATED LOT 95 LB— 813L— '� 554_63' ---o---- - 0 --- L6 - —N 28'49'10° E 801.32'— - — - — L5 ORIGINAL TOWN RUN LANE - STATE RTE. 1012 D- -1-95 TM 85 1 VARNBLE WID1N R/1Y BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT LAND OF �ALTH OIL OF THE l ARCADM COMMUMMES, L.L.C. (TAX PARCELS 85 A-136 and 85D-1-1-95) OPEQUON MGISTERAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNT), WRGINM v S . Lic. N 1837 SCALE. 1 "-200' DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane m m Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 `SU�� 3126 SHEET 5 OF 7 G RE E WAY FAX.- (540) 722-9528 BLA 16-03 ENGINEERING w�tn .greenwayeng'COrrl L) EXISTING EASEMENT S 5%27'06" E 1069.12' DETAILS I �� — — -- I � L7 • EX. WATERLINE ESMT INST. No. 060011587 EX. 20' STORM DRAINAGE ESMT 'T. No. 060011587 J J n-E X 4' PERPETUAL ROADWAY ESIAI:T. No. 060011587 O Z0 EX WATERLINE ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 Z II � ��— � I� II I� IN EX. 11 ' PRIVATE SAITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN ESMT. INST. No. 020017766 I i N 63'00 29" W 495.59' BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNMES, L.L.C. (TAX PARCELS 85 A-138 and &V-14-915) OPEQUON MGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGIN14 SCALE. 1 "=200' DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREEN WAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane FND ,yn Winchester, Vrginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4I85 GREE WAY FAX.• (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www.greettwayeng.coni 60 0 60 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) o - - .- EX. 20' SANITARY SEWER ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 TH OF Lic. No!1 s37 UR`��� 3126 SHEET 6 OF 7 BLA 16-03 EXISTING N 63'00 29" W 495.59' EASEMENT I MATCH TO SHEET 6 DETAILS I 60 0 60 I GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) I o II o I I EX. 11 ' PRIVATE SAITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN ESYT INST. No. 020017766 ti �o EX. 4' PERPETUAL y —i ROADWAY ESMT. o INST. No. 060011587 0 � I I O � EX. WATERLINE ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 �I I� 0 � p Iq I I � I [+EXSTR4 DRAINAEESMT. INST. No. 060011587 �I IX. 20' SANITARY EX. 20' SEWER ES14T. DRAINAGE ESMT. INST. No. 060011588 INST No. 060011588 ° L4 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. ALTH p�, y (W PARCELS 85-A-f88 and OPEQUON YGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, KRUM c� �NES S. H y Lic. N . 1837 SCALE: 1 "=200' DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Late Fwn 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 3126 SHEET of GREE WAY Ti1X.• (540) 722-9528 . ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com BLA 16-03 --a c� c c rn 1 VIKUINIA: FR--DERfCK COUNT'Y.SC-1. T1ris instrument of writing was produced to me on � y _ 9 - ZOI to at and with autificate acknowledgement thereto annexed was admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of NIA , and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable, 46"A 10 Clerk 160008765 RECORDATION COVER SKEET TYPE OF INSTRUMENT: DEED OF RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION DATE OF INSTRUMENT: AU"<rr 11 2016 NAME OF GRANTOR: SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. NAME OF GRANTEE: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA COUNTY/MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHERE PROPERTY LOCATED: FREDERICK COUNTY/OPEQUON DISTRICT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION FOR FUTURE PUBLIC STRHFT DEDICATION/SOUTHERN HILLS, PIIASE 1, OPEN SPACE PARCEL A (TAX PARCEL 851)-1-1-95A) INSTRUMENTS WHERE PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED/ACQUIRED: INST. NO. 060011588 (SOUTHERN HILLS PLAT) INST. NO.060013883 (SOUTHERN MILL DEED) PLAT ATTACHED: PLAT NUMBFR 3126 (ESMT 16-04), PREPARED BY GRFENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. TAX MAP PARCEI, NOS.: 85D-1-1-95A (OPEN SPACE PARCEL A) TOWN FILE NO.: ESMT 16-04 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: CULBERT & SCHMII'T, PLLC 30-C Catoctin Circle, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 (12407.007) TFD BOX 99 1 CD 0 0 THIS DEED OF RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION (flue "Deed") is made this Yµ day of AucTUS—t— 2016, by and between SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Virginia non -stock corporation formedpursuant to the pursuant to the Virginia Property Owners Association Act (referred to herein as the "Owner"), Grantor; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a body corporate and politic (referred to herein as the "County"), Grantee. RECITALS: A. The Owner is the owner and proprietor of certain real property located in Frederick County, Virginia, identified as Tax Map Parcel 8513-1-1-95A (also known as "Open Space Parcel A" and referred to herein as the "Property"), as shown on that certain plat number 3126 (ESMT 16- 04), dated July 29, 2016, entitled "Reservation for 100 Foot Wide Future Road Right-of-way on Open Space Parcel A Southern Hills Subdivision Phase 1," and prepared by Greenway Engineering, Inc., of Winchester, Virginia, certified land surveyors (the "Plat'), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; the Owner having acquired the Property by deed recorded as Instrument Number 060013883, among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia (the "Land Records"). B. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to create and establish a reservation of right-of- way for future public street dedication over and across the Property, in the location more particularly bounded and described on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. C. The Property is not subject to the lien of a deed of trust. 2 • c 0 O PUBLIC STREET RESERVATION NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Owner hereby reserves for future public street dedication to the County and/or the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") that certain area shown and depicted on the aforesaid Plat as "Reservation For 100 Foot Wide Future Road Right-of-way Hereby Granted" (the "Reservation Area"), This reservation for future public street dedication is hereby limited to a period of eighty-nine (89) years from the date of recordation of this instrument. The Owner, its successors and assigns in interest, shall dedicate to the County and/or VDOT forpublic street purposes, at no public cost to the grantee thereof, all orportions of the Reservation Area upon the request of the County and/or VDOT at any time during said eighty-nine (89) year period. MISCELLANEOUS Headings used in this Deed are for convenience purposes only and are not intended to affect the express terms herein set forth. This Deed is made in accordance with the statutes made and provided in such cases; with the approval of the proper authorities of the County, as shown by the signature affixed to this Deed, and is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the Owner, the owner and proprietor of the land depicted on the Plat. The undersigned warrants that this Deed is made and executed pursuant to authority properly granted by the charter, bylaws and action of the Board of Directors of the Association. • 0 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Deed of to be executed, under seal, 0-' by their duly authorized representatives. FURTHER WITNESS the following signatures and seals. [SIGNATURES ARE ON SUCCEEDING PAGES] c� C—, SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Virginia non -stock corporation formed pursuant to the Virginia Property Owners Association Act r STATE/COMMONWEA TL, II OP..1L VliY 1 (� CITY/COUNTY OF—/,�1l 1 �`�j, '" , to wit: � I, the un crsilmcd Notary Public, in and for the indiction of resai do hereby certify that ��—> asi��S1(1�i�1 of SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this �_ lay of 1 n I Uq U SJ 2016. My conTrT2is, on expires: (st J" 0 12) i 9 NotaryPublic -Registration No. KARRIE DEAN NOTARY PUBLIC REGISTRATION B 7090516 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION 01gPIRES 9 • 0 0 The Foregoing Right-of-way Reservation Is Hereby Accepted Pursuant To Virginia Code Section 15.2- 1803. APPRO D AS TO LEGAL FORM: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY%1GFG1( ����, VIRGINIA //�J I��RGIVIRGINIAIA t ��— By: — 4- iL, (SEAL) ounty A orney Name: Gt ! A. Title: III'S COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF FREDERICK, to wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that Recnda (27 . A'aO4Q_ as (2w, Aci on behalf of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this J9,),) - day of Auq us a , 2016. My commission expires: ��Q �F E "/& It- 30 --ID It, Notary Ilublig -Registration No. 70I1`1L3 6 0 REG0588 OF 600�1 M�10 W, 0 1tI'� TM 85-A-141 FREDERICK-WINCHESTER SERVICE AUTHORITY DB 608 PG 671 5 M W -1 2,28 135.0 0/ N ¢�23 tz 27.59' TXl 85—A-139 GARY L SCOTHERN ET AL DB 854 PG 1628 hp� TM 85D-1-1-95A OPEN SPACE PARCEL A 59 SOUTHERN HILLS SUBOMSION p� PHASE I 5 �0 SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. / INST. No. 060013883 / RESERVA77ON FOR 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE h0 \ ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY / huh c') HEREBY GRANTED j5 8 O1 j / ,E /� 06��1'S9 / o 62 N EX. 20' SANITARY 10 SEWER ESMT. p INST. No. 060011588 1 EXISTING RESERVA77ON FOR 1 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE 1 ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY INST. No. 1600029JO EX. WE 3ESVT � SEWER ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 TM 85D-1-1-95 1 ' ARCADM COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. INST. No. 120013745 TM 85—A-138 I INST. No. 120013746 ARCADM COMMUNITIES, L.L.C, INST. No. 120013745 , ` 100 0 100 RESERVA77ON FOR 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY ON OPEN SPACE PARCEL A SOUMEM ff' LS SM01 3/M PHASE l OPEQUON MGISIERAL. DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINLA TH D EST S. 1H� Lic. No. 1 37 l� g/Z9 y, (3 SURN SCALE 1 "=100' I DATE: JULY 29, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, iNc. 151 Windy Hill Lane � ,yn GREENWAY Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 Ff1X.• (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 1 OF 2 ENGINEERING www.greettivayeng.corn ESMT 16-04 Li 0 NOTES' 1. THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON PLATS OF RECORD RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT Nos. 060011588 AND 160002930, 2. NO T17LE REPORT FURNISHED. EASEMENTS MAY DUST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. J. TITLE TO OPEN SPACE PARCEL A — SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDMSION PHASE I (TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95A) IS VESTED IN SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCI4770N, INC. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 06001388J. 4. OPEN SPACE PARCEL A — SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION PHASE I WAS CREATED BY DEED AND PLAT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No. 060011588. 5. THE RESERVATION AREA HEREBY GRANTED LIES WITHIN ZONE A: SPEC4IL FLOOD H42ARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE IX ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, NO BASE FL00D ELEVATIONS DETERMINED PER MF.I.P. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 51069C0330D, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. 6. THE RESERVA770N AREA HEREBY GRANTED CONTAINS 14,906 SQUARE FEET. Z THE ENTIRETY OF THE 100 FOOT RESERVA710N FOR FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY IS BUILDING RESTRICTED. 8. ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE TO THE LAND RECORDS OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGIN/A CIRCUIT COURT CLERK'S OFRCE. LEGEND: EX. = EXIS77NG ESMT. = EASEMENT INST. No. = INSTRUMENT NUMBER TM= TAX MAP CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH TANGENT Cl 2450.00' 120.16' 2'4836" S 78'31'45" E 120.15' 60.09' C2 2550.00' 172.10' X52 O 1 " N 79' 18 50" W 172.07' 86.08' RESERVATION FOR 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY ON OPEN &PACE PARCEL A SOUMEW HILLS PHASE l OPEQUON MGI37ER14L DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGIN/A SCALE: 1 "=100' I DATE: JULY 29. 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane NSE�WAY 1 Winchester, Vrginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 G RFAX' (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www•greetiwayeng.com �NLTH OF,, 1 O � Lo) EST S. H a Lic. No. 37 3126 SHEET 2 OF 2 ESMT 16-04 c, 0 O viROIMA: FK DERICK COUNTY.SCI. This instrument of writing was produced to me on nQ'OO -201& at 9• �cf6aand with certificate acknowledgement th was admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of $ tUl_, and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. e, >0 , Clerk c=� 0 0 0 RECORDATION COVER SHEET TYPE OF INSTRUMENT: DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND RESERVATION DATE OF INSTRUMENT: �JA Z C 10 2016 NAMES OF GRANTORS: 1) ARCADIA CO,jM, UNITIES. L.L.C. 2) )'ILSTE, INC.. TRUSTEE NAMES OF GRANTEES: 1) ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. 2) DOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDF.RICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA COUNTY/MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHERE PROPERTY LOCATFD: FREDERICK COUNTY/OPEQUON DISTRICT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF SOUTHERN .HILLS, PHASE 1, LOT 95 (1'AX PARCEL 85D-)-1-95) AND RESIDUE TAX PARCEL NUMBER 85-A-138 INSTRUMENTS WHERE PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED/ACQUlltED: INST. NO. 060011588 (SOUTHERN HILLS PLAT) INST. NO.060013883 (SOUTHERN HILL DEED) INST. NO. 120013745 (PARCEL 138) INST. NO. 120013746 (LOT 95) INST. NO.150010366 (NAME CHANGE/CONVERSION) PLAT ACTACI-IED: PLAT NUMBER 3126 AND 0517B, PREPARED BY GREENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. TAX MAP PARCEL NOS.: 85-A-138 (RESIDUE PARCEL) 85D-1-1-95 (LOT 95) TOWN FILE NO.: BLA 16-03 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: CULBERT & SCHMITT, PLLC 30-C Catoctin Circle, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 (12407.007) TED BOX 99 1 . 0 CD ry THIS DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT AND RESERVATION (the "Deed") is made this _LQ±h- day of (J-I 2016, by and between ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., it Virginia limited liability company, formerly known as Arcadia Communities, Inc. (referred to herein as the "Owner"), Grantor and Grantee; TRSTE, INC., TRUSTEE (referred to herein as the "Trustee"), Grantor, WILLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, Beneficiary (referred to }herein as the "Beneficiary"); and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNT' VIRGIMA, a body corporate and politic (referred to herein as the "County"), Grantee. RECITALS: A. The Owner is the owner and proprietor of certain real property located in Frederick County, Virginia, identified as ,rax Map Parcel 85-A-138 ("Parcel 138") and Tax Map Parcel 85D- 1-1-95 ("Lot 95) (Parcel 138 and Lot 95 are sometimes collectively referred to herein as the "Property"), as shown on that certain plat number 3126 and 051713, dated February 23, 2016, entitled "Boundary Line Adjustment on the Land of Arcadia Communities, L.L.C., (Tax Parcels 85-A-138 and 85D-1-195)," and prepared by Grccnway Engineering, Inc., of Winchester, Virginia, certified land surveyors (the "Plat"), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; the Owner having acquired the Properly by deeds recorded as Instrument Number 120013745 and Instrument Number 120013746, and as modi tied by name conversion recorded as Instrument Number 150010366, among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia (the "Land Records"). s CD tD Co B. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to reconfigure and adjust the common boundary lines between Parcel 138 and Lot 95, said boundary line adjustment being more particularly shown on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. C.. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to create and establish a reservation for future public street dedication over and across the Property, in the location more particularly bounded and described on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. D. The Property is subject to the lien of a certain Credit Line Deed of Trust With Absolute Assignment of Leases mud Rents, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing, dated October20, 2015, and recorded as Instrument Number 150010369, among the Land Record, as maybe amended, modified, supplemented and/or restated from time to time (the "Deed of Trust"), wherein the Properly was conveyed unto the, Trustee, in trust, to secure a certain indebtedness, as more specifically set forth therein. BOUNDARY LINE ADJ-USTMENT OIL PARCEL 138 AND LOT 95 NOW THEREFORE- WITNE,SSETH, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar (S 1.00), cash in. band paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby aclmowledgcd, the Owner, as the owner of Parcel 138 and Lot 95, does hereby reconfigure and adjust the common boundary lines between Parcel 138 and Lot 95, in the locations shown on the Plat as "Property Line Hereby Created" and deleting the existing boundary lilies in the locations shown on the Plat as "Property Lines Hereby Vacated," thereby creating New Parcel 138 (New T'M 85-A-138), containing of approximately 11.8556 Acres of land, and New Lot 95 (New I'M 85D-1-1-95), containing of approximately 40.3609 Acres of land, as more particularly bounded and described on the Plat. The lots and parcels hereby reconfigure and 3 CD 0 Z_ boundary lute adjusted are adjacent to and contiguous with one another, having been acquired by the Owner, as set forth hereinabove. The Property hereby boundary line adjusted, as shown on the Plat, is subject to all recorded casements, conditions, restrictions, and agreements that lawfully apply to all or any such part thereof. PUBLIC STREET RESERVATION TIIIS DEED FURTHER WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are.hereby acknowledged, the Owner hereby reserves for future public street dedication to the County and/or the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") that certain area shown and depicted on the aforesaid Plat as "Reservation For 100 root Wide Future Right- of-way" (the "Reservation Area"), This reservation for future public street dedication is hereby Wnited to a period of eighty-nine (89) years from the date of recordation of this instrument. The Owner, its successors and assigns in interest, shall dedicate to the County and/or VDOT for public street purposes, at no public cost to the grantee thereof, all or portions of the Reservation Area upon the request of the County and/or VDOT at any time during said eighty-nine (89) year period. TRUSTEE'S CONSENT AND SUBORDINATION Ti11S DEED FURTIIE'R WITNESSETII, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand.paid, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Trustee, as authorized to act by the Beneficiary, as shown by its execution hereto, does hereby (i) consent to the boundary line adjustment of the Property, as shown on the flat and (u) subordinate the said lien of tltc Deed of Trust to file foregoing reservation for public street purposes. 4 CD CD CJl STATUTORY COMPLIANCE The platting of the land and adjustment of the boundary lines provided by this instrument is made with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the Owner and the Trustee, and in accordance with the provisions of Virginia Code Section 15.2-2264, and applicable regulations of Frederick County, Virginia, as evidenced by the approval of said boundary line adjustment by authorized officials of Frederick County, Virginia, as noted on the attached Plat. MISCELLANEOUS Headings used in thus Deed are for convenience purposes oldy and are not intended to affect the express terms herein set forth. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Deed of to be executed, undersea], by their duly authorized representatives. FURTHER WITNESS the following signatures and seals. [SIGNATURES ARE ON SUCCEEDING PAGES] i 5 I c 0 0 ARCADIA COMMUNTI'IES, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company By: VMB Investments, i,.i,.C., a Delaware limited liability company, Its Sole Member and Manager By: VM Holdings M, L.L.C., a Virginia limited liability company Its Managing Member By: Van Metre Financial Associates, Inc., a Virginia corporation Its Manager By: Name: I'itic: - ''o STATL'/COMMONWLAL'I'H OF k6 11\) A CITY/COUNTY OF A I CcE - to wit: I the }�udersi of NotaryPublic in and for th urisd'Ctio raforesaid, do here ycertify that .Yl(�.OT A LL as t� 1 S— LnQ.ni�i�_� TofVan Metre Financial Associates, hrc., as Manager of VM Holdings III, L.L.C., as Managing Member of VMB Investments, L.L.C., as Sole Member and Manager of ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C., whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in myjurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my band and seal this _LQay of { C.'-! , 2016. My commission expires: I j A a- A d N rt• ry Public Notary Registration No.: L lU Notary Public Commomof veatth of Virpinia 7049698 my Commission Expires Dee 31, 2018 � —o CD 0 0 1 TRUSTEE: TRSTE, INC,, TRUSTEE, a Virginia corporation By: (SEAL) Name: Tilde: o Prestdent STATE/COMMONWEALTH OF CITY/COUNTY OF "DIA.�_ to wit: 1, the unde r ned Notary Public, in and for the furl di aforesaid, do bereby certify that �`� DIsty) as of TRSTE, INC., 'TRUSTEE, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this J2da of , 2016. My commission expires: —a.15 )�q N yP IiOC/ Notary Registration No.:1��1 BENEFICIARY: WELLS FAROO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a national banking association, Beneficiary By: (SEAL) Name: BfA� C. son •title:—�tia-Fr�9:dent STATE/COMMONWEALTI-I QF -- i 6 7T CITY/COUNTY OF r� -- „ to wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the jurisdicti aforesaid, do hereby certify that -a ( _ Bolo 1(Z � , as V. � of WELI S FAR60 BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Beneficiary, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appoared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN tinder my hand and scal this _l LL_ day of MCV64-1 2016. My commission expires: Uqh(( — NotaryPu tc NotaryRegistration No.: 10194��7-3 JACp�O�i qy �o ,20 • `�� ''',��0� ►08itt�� ���� BOUN04RY UNE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCAM COMMWEA uC. (TAX PARCELS 85-A-W and 8W-1-1-95) OPEOU19N MAUSTERML DISTRICT. FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRG/N14 FEBRUARY 23, 2016 VICINITY MAP 1 " = 1200' 9A STICKLEY DR. � z racy oAkel PEAC LENND TYALN. a � TOWN RUN LANE - RTE. 1012 Stephens I_81 City OWNERS CERTIFICATE THE ABOVE AND FOREGOING BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE LAND OF ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS, AND TRUSTEES, IF �/Y. T}2(tpiACo�C�V"�tnla) rni Ca 110.biII Com((tny�2N!vM13 'L 1�m� {t?C] 110.bjt It Ns 5b� MQ.mbt it i Vr�)�7�,iEN i . L�ICw Corn j i 'am itr���sn�c,s cu,)Om Lr1Ctff.r �a\j � �-�-C C� V12G,i�JI� 1_Irntrr=nUa(31�t t (� MP1�Ny, i is MANA6 iN& NEM6E-2, (may: df\t\J' tv1&V-L �,ni�N �ftl ASSCC_WC�, tt� RJ�2G,in11P CJ2Po2ran�rJ, trSM c�AC,C- ISA; COMMONWEALTH OF WRGINIA �nt'u��ti , �IlQY1Ci CITY / .COUNTY OF EA 1 i��A � TO WIT.- U Ce r THE FOREGOING OWNERS CERTIRCATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED LAURA L. LYDIC BEFORE ME 1HIS I DAY OF IPSP %� 20 Notary Public . Commonwealth of Virginia BY (� 7049698 �,00nrf ,;(A ar ` My Commission Expires Dec 31, 2018 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 1 20 ( . 1 REGISTRA77ON No. I( ILO Qt NOTARY PUBLI SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE LAND CONTAINED IN THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT IS ALL OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 6, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT No. 120013745 AND A POR77ON OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. BY DEED DATED DECEMBER 6, 2012 AS INSTRUMENT No. 120013746, AND THAT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE ORDINANCES OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA REGARDING THE PLATTING OF SUBDIVISIONS WITHIN THE COUNTY HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH. ERNEST S. HOL ORTH, L.S. ADATE PARENT TAX PARCEL IDENTIFICATION T.M. 85-A-138 51.9269 ACRES ZONES: RP, 62 USE. VACANT T.M. 85D-1-1-95 0.2896 ACRES ZONE: RP USE. VACANT APPROVAL: TH Dot' p t FREDERICK COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRA DATE RNEST S. "NO TH y Lic. No. 1837 (3 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane RtEAY Winchester, Vuginia 22602 SURN Telephone: (540) 662-4185 GR FAX: (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 1 OF 7 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com BLA 16-03 ORIGINAL T.M. 85—A-138 51.9269 ACRES ORIGINAL T A. 85D-1-1-95 0.2896 ACRES (LOT 95 SOUTHERN HILLS PH. I) TOTAL 52,2165 ACRES NEW TAX PARCEL 85 A-138 11,8556 ACRES NEW TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95 40.3609 ACRES TOTAL 52.2165 ACRES = CENTERLINE R W = RIGHT—OF—WAY = EXISTING ESMT. = EASEMENT INST. No. = INSTRUMENT NUMBER TM = TAX MAP BRL = BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE PER ZONING ORDINANCE NOTES 1. THE BOUNDARY AND ACREAGE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON PLATS OF RECORD AND FIELD SURVEYS PERFORMED BY THIS FIRM. 2. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. J. TITLE TO TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 IS VESTED IN ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 120013745. TITLE TO TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95 (LOT 95 OF SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION PHASE I AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 060011588) IS VESTED IN ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 120013746. ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. IS SUCCESSOR TO ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, INC. BY CONVERSION AS RECORDED BY INSTRUMENT No. 150010366. 4. THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON LIES WITHIN ZONE A: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 19 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED AND ZONE X.• AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2q ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN PER N.F.LP. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 51069CO330D, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. THE APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SAID ZONE A ARE DEPICTED HEREON AS DETERMINED BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING OF THE REFERENCED FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP. 5. TAX PARCEL 85—A-138 HAS THE REMAINS OF A HOUSE, A BARN AND VARIOUS FARM RELATED OUT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES. ALL OF THESE ARE ABANDONED AND IN RUINS. 6. BUILDING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS FOR B2 ZONING ARE. FRONT — 50' ON PRIMARY/ATERIAL HIGHWAYS, 35' ON COLLECTOR/MINOR STREETS SIDE & REAR — NONE BUILDING SETBACK RESTRICTIONS FOR RP ZONING ARE BASED ON THE CLASSIFICA77ON OF HOUSING TYPES WHICH ARE DETERMINED DURING SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT THE ENTIRETY OF THE 100 FOOT RESERVATION FOR FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY IS BUILDING RESTRICTED. Z ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE TO THE LAND RECORDS OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CLERKS OFFICEE, BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT LTH p OF THE LAND OF A ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, LLC. (TAX PARCELS 85 A-W and 85D-1-1-95) OPEQUON MGISTERML DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGIN14 tItNES . H RTH SCALE- NIA I DATE. • FEBRUARY 23, 2016 Lic. No. 1837 GR&EATWAYENGINEERING, INC. �%(3 151 Windy 1-Iill Lane SURF Rm ,�, Winchester, Virginia 22602 'Telephone: (540) 662-4185 GREE WAY FAX.- (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 2 of 7 ENGINEERING tUww•greentvayeng.com BLA 16-03 LINE BEARING DISTANCE L 1 N 273243" E 10.05' L2 N 62'27'17" W 50.00' L3 N 59'13'09" W 142.23' L4 N 61'1050" W 145.04' L5 N 273243" E 95.43' L6 N 29'00'04" E 164.02' L7 S 61'09'46" E 15.28' L8 N 28'50'14" E 37.14' L9 S 353941 " W 129.60' L10 S 4723'14" W 111.61' L l l S 06'21 '59" W 148.29' L 12 S 06,21,59" W 399.78' L 13 S 19'38'51 " E 235.49' L14 S 00'13'48" W 269.38' L 15 S 02'53'17" E 75.12' L 16 S 08'4549" W 280.04. L 17 S 03'25'04" E 104.05' L18 S 8835'13" W 339.65' CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH TANGENT Cl 2824.79' 102.03' 2'04'10" N 2952'19" E 102.03' 51.02' C2 2450.00' 603.61' 14'06'58" N 70'03'58" W 602.09' 303.34' C3 2550.00' 639.66' 14 22 21 " S 70' 11 '39" E 637.98' 321.52' BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF ARCAM COMMUNITIES, LLC. CTAK PARCELS 85-A-138 and 85D•-1-1-5) OPEQUON YGISTERW DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGINIA SCALE: N/A I DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GRESNWAY ENGINEERING INC. 757 Windy Hill Lane FND 1971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 GREE WAY FAX (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.can 011 of 05T S. HOB TH' Lic. No. 11837g. 3126 SHEET 3 OF 7 BLA 16-03 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) \ 0 66 oe aok 11 Gay CEMETERY 1 O�,Op 0 600 A j�` 0� tl0 0. 0 N I I 01E \�Sj' 100.62' I z1Z NEW TM 85D-1-1-95 I m `^ 40.3609 ACRES I ° ZONE RP & B2 PROPERTY LINE HEREBY CREATED II N I RESERVA71ON FOR 100 FOOT WIDE I, FUTURE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY of ORIGINAL 1 Td! 85-A-138 �' WESTCHESTER OR. 0 50'R/W =� EX. TEMPORARY 1 ICUL-DE-SAC ESMT I ' I o INST. No. 060011588 +��CO o EX. 20' SANITARY {v L 1 I I'° EX. 20' SEWER ESMT. 0 DRAINAGE ESMT. INST No. 060011568 J INST. No. 060011588 N 27i32'43" E 527.1 D_ I � I PROPERTY LINES 3b71 �1� LLB RD7Vl Off Pi ASS 0— 100.05' HEREBY VACATED LOT d� INS . No. 6001 588 95 LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT LOT 554_63-----__- 92 91 90 89 _ -_ 94 93 =-o 0 N 2 9'10" E 801.32'— --- L5 -------c-------- ORIGINAL TOWN RUN LANE - . STATE RTE. 1012 Thf 85D-1-1-95 V,RA6LE WIDTH R/W BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF A LTH p OF THE LAND ARCADL4 COMAAIl71ES, LL.C. 0 (TAX PARCELS 85-A-M and 85D-1-1915) �� f OPEQUON AIGISTERIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY WRGIN14 LIc.�N/. 1837 L (3 SCALE. 1 "--200' DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GRE E NWA Y ENGINEE RING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane Rm �n, Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 0517E SHEET 4 OF 7 G RE E WAY X. (540) 722-9528 BLA 16-03 ENGINEERING www.gree„wage,:g.coni • 200 0 200 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) Of ��°R� 6 l��1p No. 0 TU 85—A-141 FREDERICK—WINCHESTER SERVICE AUTHORITY DB 608 PG 671 L1� /VV.VL TH 85—A-142A 9 TOWN OF 1 , NEW TM 85D-1-1-95 DB 700STEPHENS CITY PG 27 \� z�Z 40.3609 ACRES N ZONE RP & B2 � A 1 � i' PROPERTY LINE X HEREBY CREATED NEW*TM 85-A-138 I N , • � 1.8556 ACRES ` ` RESERV4770N FOR ZONE B2 100 FOOT WIDE I FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY / o ORIGINAL / TM 85—A—i3B a N O o f EX. 20' SANITARY i o N I SEWER ESMT:. e m TNST. No. 060011587 o ui=o h I C3 to p m = EX. 20' DW42 I e INSTT No. 060011588 I �to I� — �n PROPERTY LINES 7'? coo I 100.05' HEREBY VACATED LOT 554_63- C1 — o u --- --�-- ---o —� — - L6 - —N 28'49 10 E 801.32 — - — - — - L5- TOWN RUN LANE - STATE RTE. 1012 ORIGINAL VARME W10TH RIV TM 85D-1-1-95 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT TH pF OF THE LAND OF ARCADL4 COMMUNMES, LL C CTAX PARCELS 85-A-M snd OPEQUON MGISTERW DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, ORGIN/A o ERNS H R a SCALE. l '--200' DATE. FEBRUARY 23, 2016 Lic. N . 1837 GREENWAY ENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane SURy,9' � 1971 Wincheste , Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 G RE E WAY F,AX.• (540) 722-9528 3126 SHEET 5 OF 7 ENGINEERING wivw.b�reenwg. aycncom BLA 16-03 --o c--j 0 Q c. EXISTING 60 0 60 EASEMENT S 57'27106" E 1069.12' �— GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET)' DETAILS I I — f �a ors Z `Z EX. WATERLINE ESMT. o T INST. No. 060011587 a r 00 o wo�'o L7�\ `p • o EX. 20' STORM OWNAGE ESMT 1 INST. No. 060011587 EX 4' PERPETUAL ROADWAY ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 O Z0 WATERLINE ESMT. EX 20' SANITARY INST. No. 060011587 C SEWER ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 rEX, rri o I / !Lo I a I� Fj II IN EX. 11PRIVATE SAITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN ESMT. INST. No. 020017766 I N 63'00'29" W 495.59' — — o MATCH TO SHEET 7 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF LTH p �,� ARCADIA COMMWME3, L.L.C. (TAX PARCELS 85 A-138 and 85D-1-1--95) OPEQUON MG/STFRIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGINL4 0 EST S. TH Llc.. /N . 1837 Z3 (3 SCALE.• 1 "=200' DATE: FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GIZEENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy 1-lill Lane �G/ UR`�' tro Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 3126 SHEET 6 OF GREE �WAY Elff- (5 40) 722-9S28 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.coin BLA 16-03 Ll -a O 0 X- EXISTING EASEMENT DETAILS N 63'00 29 W 495.59' - - - MATCH TO SHEET 6 I 2 60 0 60 GRAPHIC SCALE (IN FEET) rn o I N ( I ,I EX. 11 ' PRIVATE -WTARY SEWER FORCE MAIN ESMT INST. No. 020017766 U. 4' PERPETUAL �a z�y ROADWAY ESMT. boo INST No. 060011587 Z I I I rn o c^� Z � oll I EX WATERLINE ESMT INST. No. 060011587 �I i� 0 ti I EX. STORM DRAINAGE ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 IX. 20' SANITARY EX 20' ER ESVT SNo. DRAINAGE ESMT. INST060 1 588 INST. No. 060011588 ° L4 LOT 95 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT OF THE LAND OF TH p�,L ARCADIA COMMUNTIES, LL.C. �� ('TAX PARCELS 85-A-M end 85D-1-1-0) ✓ OPEQUON YGISTERAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGINN ES S. H Lic. N . 1837 SCALE.- 1 --200' DATE.- FEBRUARY 23, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, TNC. 151 PVindy Hill Lane If SURN MD ,971 Winchester, Virginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 3126 SHEET 7 OF 7 GREE WAY FlIX., (540) 722-9528 - ENGINEERING I www.greemvayeng.coin BLA 16-03 0 • VIRGINIA: rR DERICK COUNTY.SC1. This instrument of writing was produced to me on 4-9- Zoi(o at 9' l � A 0 and with certificate acknowledgement thereto annexed was admitted to rc eord.'I'ax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of $ N (A , and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. 4C'A �!/`� Clerk o-'N 160008765 RECORDATION COVER SHEET TYPE OF INSTRUMENT: DEED OF RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION DATE OF INSTRUMENT: Auc-u5r7 11 2016 NAME OF GRANTOR: SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC. NAME OF GRANTEE: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA COUNTY/MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT WHERE PROPERTY LOCATED: FREDERICK COUNTY/OPEQUON DISTRICT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION FOR FUTURE PUBLIC STREETDEDICATION/SOUTHERN HILLS, PHASE 1, OPEN SPACE PARCEL A (TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95A) INSTRUMENTS WHERE PROPERTY SUBDIVIDED/ACQUIRED: INST. NO. 060011588 (SOUTHERN HILLS PLAT) INST. NO. 060013883 (SOUTHERN HILL DEED) PLAT ATTACHED: PLAT NUMBER 3126 (ESMT 16-04), PREPARED BY GRE13NWAY ENGINEERING, INC. TAX MAP PARCEL NOS.: 8513-1-I-95A (OPEN SPACE PARCEL A) TOWN FILE NO.: ESMT 16-04 PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: CULBERT & SCHMITT, PLLC 30-C Catoctin Circle, S.E. Leesburg, Virginia 20175 (12407.007) TED BOX 99 1 CD 0 c, .r.-- THIS DEED OF RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION (the "Deed") is made this (Tµ day of Aucro--, — 2016, by and between SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Virginia non -stock corporation formed pursuant to the pursuant to the Virginia Property Owners Association Act (referred to herein as the "Owner"), Grantor; and the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, a body corporate and politic (referred to herein as the "County"), Grantee. RECITALS: A. The Owner is the owner and proprietor of certain real property located in Frederick County, Virginia, identified as Tax Map Parcel 85D-1-1-95A (also known as "Open Space Parcel A" and referred to herein as the "Property"), as shown on drat certainplat number 3126 (ESMT 16- 04), dated July 29, 2016, entitled "Reservation for 100 Foot Wide Future Road Right-of-way on Open Space Parcel A Southern Hills Subdivision Phase 1," and prepared by Greenway Engineering, Inc., of Winchester, Virginia, certified land surveyors (the "Plat'), which Plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; the Owner having acquired the Property by deed recorded as Instrument Number 060013883, among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia (the "Land Records"). B. It is the desire and intent of the Owner to create and establish a reservation of right-of- way for future public street dedication over and across the Property, in the location more particularly bounded and described on the Plat and as hereinafter provided. C. The Property is not subject to the lien of a deed of trust. 4 O O C_ PUBLIC STREET RESERVATION NOW THEREFORE WITNESSETH, that in consideration of the premises and the sum of One Dollar ($1.00), cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Owner hereby reserves for future public street dedication to the County and/or the Virginia Department of Transportation ("VDOT") that certain area shown and depicted on the aforesaid Plat as "Reservation For 100 Foot Wide Future Road Right-of-way Hereby Granted" (the "Reservation Area"), This reservation for future public street dedication is hereby limited to a period of eighty-nine (89) years from the date of recordation of this instrument. The Owner, its successors and assigns in interest, shall dedicate to the County and/or VDOT for public street purposes, at no public cost to the grantee thereof, all orportions of the Reservation Area upon the request of the County and/or VDOT at any time during said eighty-nine (89) year period. MISCELLANEOUS Headings used in this Deed are for convenience purposes only and are not intended to affect the express terms herein set forth. This Deed is made in accordance with the statutes made and provided in such cases; with the approval of the proper authorities of the County, as shown by the signature affixed to this Deed, and is with the free consent and in accordance with the desire of the Owner, the owner and proprietor of the land depicted on the Plat. The undersigned warrants that Us Deed is made and executed pursuant to authority properly granted by the charter, bylaws and action of the Board of Directors of the Association. 3 0 • 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Deed of to be executed, under seal, 0 by their duly authorized representatives. FURTHER WITNESS the following signatures and seals. [SIGNATURES ARE ON SUCCEEDING PAGES] SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Virginia non -stock corporation formed pursuant to the Virginia Property Owners Association Act i STATE/COMNIONWEA TL, I II OF �Oli� 1 (1 CITY/COUNTY OF. 1r�j, '" , to wit: I, the un crsigncd No�iblic�-��—�ons(Teyu�isdiction afpresaicj, do hereby certify that of Me, nedYC'SI C'Yl SOUTHERN HILLS HO OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and scat this —l�'ayof 1 n I LJU� S+ 2016. My com 1son expires: ,130 12.019 Nota Public - Registration No. KARKIE DEAN NOTARY PUBLIC REGISTRATION 77090516 COMMONWEALTH Of VIRGINIA MY COUNE30 201gPIIlES The Foregoing Right-of-way Reservation Is Hereby Accepted Pursuant To Virginia Code Section 15.2- 1803. APPR2yF,D AS TO LEGAL FORM: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA By:Am44,L- (SEAL) ounty, A omey Name: G�zio Title: haw COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, COUNTY OF FREDERICK, to wit: I, the undersigned Notary Public, in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that 1rnda OF . t�QC"_ _ was CmJ4 Aci M_ on behalf of the BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, appeared before me and personally acknowledged the same in my jurisdiction aforesaid. GIVEN under my hand and seal this ,?4-"- _ day of Ayq �: 1 12016. My commission expires: � E ` 6l. 11- 30 .lp 14. Notary Vubll -Registration No. 7011143 OF 001 OTX00.0 00 7M 85-A-141 FREDERI CK- WINCHESTER SERVICE AUTHORITY DB 608 PG 671 5 3g.0�0 27.59' TM 85-A-139 GARY L SC07HERN ET AL DB 854 PG 1628 5p� TM 85D-1-1-95A OPEN SPACE PARCEL A c�9 SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION p� PHASE I 5 �p SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC147ION, INC. / INST. No. 0600I J883 / , RESERVATION FOR o \ 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE / h� ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY // i tip �ryh ) HEREBY GRANTED648. %� E 06,21 59 \ EX. 20' SANITARY \ 100,6� N SEWER ESMT. �p INST. No. 060011588 1 1 EXISTING RESERVATION FOR ' 1 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY INST. No. 160002930 EX. 20' SANITARY SEWER ESMT. INST. No. 060011587 1 TM 85D-1-1-95 1 ARCADIA COMMUNIRES, L.L.C. 1� INST. No. 120013745 TM 85—A-138 1 INST. No. 120013746 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES, L.L.C. I INST. No. 1200IJ745 I , I / l 100 0 100 / GRAPHIC SCALE /N FEET RESERVATION FOR 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY NLTH OF ON OPEN SPACE PARCEL A S+OMERV ht.LS SUBDIMON PHASE l ' OPEQUON MGISIFRIAL DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, NRG/NL4 NEST S. TH Lic. No. 1 37 SCALE: 1 "--100' DATE. JULY 29, 2016 GREENWAY ENGINEERING, wc. 9A� 151 Windy Hill Lane Fxn ,9n Winchester, Vrgbiia 22602 SUgV�,�O Telephone: (540) 662-4185 3126 SHEET 1 OF 2 G RE E WAY FAX:(540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING wwwpeenwayeng.coin ESMT 16-04 Li NOTES' 1. THE BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON PLATS OF RECORD RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT Nos. 060011588 AND 160002930. 2. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. EASEMENTS MAY DUST WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN. J. TIRE TO OPEN SPACE PARCEL A - SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIVISION PHASE I (TAX PARCEL 85D-1-1-95A) IS VESTED IN SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIA770N, INC. AS RECORDED BY INS7RUMENT No. 060013883. 4. OPEN SPACE PARCEL A - SOUTHERN HILLS SUBDIKSION PHASE I WAS CRE4TED BY DEED AND PLAT RECORDED AS INSTRUMENT No. 060011588. 5. THE RESERVA77ON ARF4 HEREBY GRANTED LIES WI7HIN ZONE A: SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS (SFHAs) SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY THE 1X ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD, NO BASE FLOOD ELEVA77ONS DE7ERYINED PER N.F.LP. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP No. 51069C0330D, EFFECTIVE DATE SEPTEMBER 2, 2009. 6. 7HE RESERVA77ON AREA HEREBY GRANTED CONTAINS 14,906 SQUARE FEET. Z THE EN77RETY OF THE 100 FOOT RESERVA77ON FOR FUTURE ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY IS BUILDING RESTRICTED. 8. ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE TO THE LAND RECORDS OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY, NRGINA CIRCUIT COURT CLERKS OFFICE. LEGEND: EX. = EXIS77NG ESMT. = EASEMENT INST. No. = INSTRUMENT NUMBER 7M = TAX MAP CURVE RADIUS ARC LENGTH DELTA ANGLE CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH TANGENT Cl 2450.00' 1 120.16' 248 36' S 78'31 '45' E 120.15' 60.09' C2 2550. 00' 172.10' X52'O 1 ' N 79' 18 50' W 172. 07' 86. 08' RESERVATION FOR 100 FOOT WIDE FUTURE ROAD RIGHT—OF—WAY ON OPEN SPACE PARCEL A SOUMEW hf-LS SIEDlV&W PHASE' l OPEQUON MGISTERW DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGIN14 SCALE. 1 "=100' I DATE: JULY 29, 2016 GREENWAYENGINEERING, INC. 151 Windy Hill Lane SE�WAY , Winchester, Vtginia 22602 Telephone: (540) 662-4185 G RFAX.- (540) 722-9528 ENGINEERING www.greenwayeng.com �pi,TH pF11 "S,H 3126 SHEET 2 OF 2 ESMT 16-04 -n 0 viR(JINIA: FR--DERICK COUNTY-SM. This instrument of writing was produced/to me on Q�O - ZO ILO at _9 `i 7 /� • m--- and with corlificate acknowledgement thereto annexed was admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of $.t� tl , and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable 4e,.t > , Clerk 0 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane _ Founded in 1y71 Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Southern hills Phase 2 Rezoning - Attributable Impacts Document File No: 3126V Date: Mon, Oct 31, 2016 To: FC Planning Attn: Candice Perkins Copied Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail From: Evan Wyatt GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 [7 Courier ❑ Pick Up Other lJrgent y For Your Review As You Requested ,% Please Comment Message Hi Candice, 1 have updated the Residential Development Attributable Impacts front end document to reflect the revisions made to the October 13, 2016 Proffer Statement for your use with the Board of Supervisors agenda. Please note that I also included a document that provides redline text for new information and blueline strike-thru text for information that has been eliminated. Please ensure that you remove the back end document information that pertains to Clear Brook Park when you provide this to the Board. Please contact me if we need to discuss anything regarding this matter. Thanks, Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: 0 �J 3- O-A`- Founded in 1971 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Southern Hills Phase 2 Revised Proffer Statement FILE COPY File No: 3126V Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2016 To: Count, Attorney From: Evan Wyatt Attn: Rod Williams GREENWAY ENGINEERING Copied Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: Fed Ex 0 Other _ U.S. Mail 0 Courier Pick Up Urgent P] For Your Review As You Requested Z Please Comment Message '.. We received the staff report for the October 19th Planning Commission meeting and wanted to address the concern to ensure that the proffered monetary contribution was consistent with the attributable impacts identified by staff. I have attached a copy of the October 13, 2016 Proffer Statement that proivdes the redline revisions; as well as the clean copy with updated owner signature that we received via Fed Ex today. This information has been provided to the Planning Department, which also includes the original October 13, 2016 Proffer Statement. Please contact me if we need to discuss anything regarding this matter. Thank you, Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: j Received by: Date: Please Print Name: • • 0 Founded in 1971 GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Southern Hills Phase 2 Revised Proffer Statement File No: 3126V Date: Tue, Oct 18, 2016 To: FC Planning Attn: Candice Perkins Copied Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ Other _ ❑ U.S. Mail O C T 1 8 2016 From: Evan Wyatt GREENWAY ENGINEERING Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Courier ❑ Pick Up Urgent 0 For Your Review ❑ As You Requested �J Please Comment Message Hi Candice, We received the staff report for the October 19th Planning Commission meeting and wanted to address the concern to ensure that the proffered monetary contribution was consistent with the attributable impacts identified by staff. I have attached a copy of the October 13, 2016 Proffer Statement that proivdes the redline revisions, a clean copy with updated owner signature; as well as the original October 13, 2016 Proffer Statement that we received via Fed Ex today. This information has been provided to the County Attorney to ensure that he is aware of the new proffer prior to tomorrow night's meetijng. Please contact me if we need to discuss anything regarding this matter. Thank you, Evan Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: 9 • 0 0 Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HAVE COMPLETED. Initials Date & Time Candice Mark Dave TN lei - Mike John COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time):_ (S:Office on Blackbox\Forms\Document Approval Form—6/7/2016 ) V �J r GREENWAY ENGINEERING 1.51 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 TRANSMITTAL Project Name: Southern Hills Phase 2 Rezoning File No: 3126V Date: Mon, Sep 19, 2016 To: FC Planninty From: Evan Wyatt/ran Attn: Candice Perkins GREENWAY ENGINEERING Copied Van Metre Companies Phone: 540-662-4185 Fax: 540-722-9528 Delivery: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ U.S. Mail 0 Courier ❑ Pick Up ❑ Other ❑ Urgent 0 For Your Review ❑ As You Requested ❑ Please Comment Message Hi Candice, Please see the attached original siganture Southern Hills PH 2 Rezoning Packet, as well as additional file copy of packet, fee check, and CD of all files contained in the packet. Should you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact our office at any time. Thank you. Hand Delivery and Pick Ups Only: Received by: Date: Please Print Name: COUNTY of FREDERICI< Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING October 26, 2016 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RC: REZONING APPLICATION #I 1-16 FOR SOUTHERN HILLS On behalf'of the Frederick County Board ol'Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, November 9, 2016, at 7:00 pm in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #11-16 for Southern Hills, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 37.79 acres fi-om RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, and 2.56 acres from 132 (General Business) District to 132 (General Business) District with revised proffers. The property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane, in the Opeduon Magisterial District, and is identified by Property Identification Number 85D-1-1-95. Any interested parties having clucstions or wishing to speak may do so at the public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.f-ecIerick.va.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Assistant Director CEP/pd 107 North Kent Sli'CCt, Suite 202 9 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on % c) ,�2 (0 G from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, vII-ginia: 85D - 1. 1. 95-A 85D - 1. 1. 95- SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC PO BOX 5368 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 SAN JOSE CA 95150.5360 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85 - A- - 59- 85D - 1- 1. 95-B LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 1000 LOWES BLVD PO BOX 5368 MOORESVILLE NC 28117.8520 SAN JOSE CA 95150.5368 85 - A- - 138- ARCADIA LAND INC 150 ALMADEN BLVD SUITE 1100 SAN JOSE CA 95113.2030 85D - 1. 1. 89- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 90- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 Candice I . Perkins, -1-G ,,7A Assistant Director l'redcrick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Candice B. Perkins, Assistant Director for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated o P , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this �(s day of My commission expires on (-; (f-e ),o, 6, � 3 / Q- (-) / `1 NOTARY UBLjgNOTAT ON PUBLIC It 354474 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DECEMBER 31, 2017 Easy Peel® Labels Use Avery® Template 51610 Feed Paper Bend along line to expose Pop-up EdgeTM �AVERVOsirW) 85D - 1. 1. 91- R ACADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 990(fMAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX,.VA 22031.3907 85D • 1. 1. 91• , ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D • 1. 1. 91- \� ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FA7AX VA 22031.3907 85D 11 91- ARCADIA\COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA \ 22031.3907 ttiquettes faciles A peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51610 Sens de chargement Repliez A la hachure afin de www.averycom r6v6ler le rebord Pop-up'"` 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels ® _ Use Avery© Template 51610 Feed Paper 85D - 1. 1. 92- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 92- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 93- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 93- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 94- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 94- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 Bend along line to = expose Pop-up EdgeTM �AVERV®5161® i 85D - 1. 1. 92- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 92- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 91iiQ0 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1- 1. 93- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 93- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 94- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 94- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 ttiquettes faciles A peter ® I Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com I Utilisez le gabarit AVERY© 51610 Sens de chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-up" 1-800-GO-AVERY j COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING October 5, 2016 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #1 ]-]6 FOR SOUTHERN HILLS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, at 7:00 pm in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #11-16 for Southern Hills, submitted by Grcenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 37.79 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, and 2.56 acres from 132 (General Business) District to 132 (General Business) District with revised proffers. The property is located on the cast side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane, 111 the Opeglloll Magisterial District, and is identified by Property Identification Number 85D-I-1-95. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may do so at the public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.fi•ederick.va.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Assistant Director CEP/pd 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 9 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on 1 1,()�1` b from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 85D • 1. 1. 95•A 85 - A- - 59- LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 1000 LOWES BLVD MOORESVILLE NC 28117.8520 85 - A- - 138- ARCADIA LAND INC 150 ALMADEN BLVD SUITE 1100 SAN JOSE CA 95113.2030 85D - 1- 1. 89- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 85D - 1. 1. 90- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 850 - 1. 1. 95- ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST STE 500 FAIRFAX VA 22031.3907 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE CA 95150.5368 85D - 1- 1. 95-B SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE CA 95150.5368 Candice F. Perkins, AICI', CZA Assistant Director Frederick County Planning Dept. a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Candice L. Perkins, Assistant Director for the Department of Plan ling and Development, whose name Is signed to the foregoing, dated ( d� has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this clay of My commission expires on ��� ,�2� \3r -Z 0 i NOTAgK0 FC 4474 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES - DECEMBER 31, 2017 1�1 ze8,i;n) PTIV�� SOUTHERN HILLS - PHASE 2 Tax Map Number Owner Mailing Address City & State ZIP Code Acres 85 A 59 LOWE'S HOME CENTERS INC 1000 LOWES BLVD MOORESVILLE, NC 28117 89.86 5 A 138 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 11.86 85D 11 89 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.29 85D 11 90 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 99CO MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 11 91 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 11 92 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 11 93 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0.28 85D 1 1 94 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 0,28 85D 11 95 ARCADIA COMMUNITIES LLC 9900 MAIN ST, STE 500 FAIRFAX, VA 22031 40.36 85D 11 95A SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 17.53 85D 11 958 SOUTHERN HILLS HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC PO BOX 5368 SAN JOSE, CA 95150 0.34 y SOURCE: FREDERICK COUNTY GIS, 2016 DATA ADJOINING PROPERTIES LISTING SORTED BY TAX MAP NUMBER COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-639� NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING October 5, 2016 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #11-16 FOR SOUTHERN HILLS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, at 7:00 pm in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #11-16 for Southern Hills, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 37.79 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers, and 2.56 acres from B2 (General Business) District to B2 (General Business) District with revised proffers. The property is located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012) approximately 0.6 miles south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and Town Run Lane, in the Opequon Magisterial District, and is identified by Property Identification Number 85D-1-1-95. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may do so at the public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Assistant Director CEP/pd I 1 Ui l 1 North Kent Street, Suite 202 9 Winchester. Virginia 22601-5000 DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS FREDERICK COUNTY, V]RGUOA (;Ln 41 (,-t- GIS, MAPPING, GRAPHICS WORK REQUEST DATE RECEIVED: '1 12 �c I �t) REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: 10 REQUESTING AGENT Department, Agency, or Company:_ Mailing and/or Billing Address: Telephone: E-mail Address: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: FAX: I�0 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (Write additional information on back of request) o mcqc, -tLl ,l t— t (n l'� l S SR z DIGITAL: PAPER: FAX: E-MAIL: SIZES: COLOR: BLACKIWHITE: NUMBER OF COPIES: STAFF MEMBER: COMPLETION DATE: MATERIALS: DATE OF PICK-UP/DELIVFRY: AMOUNT DUE: AMOUNT BILLED: METHOD OF PAYMENT: HOURS REQUIRED: AMOUNT PAID: CHECK NO.# Frederick County GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 2-2601, (540)665-5651) 114