Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-15 Freedom Manor PINs 64-A-23, A-20, 64-A-19 - Shawnee - Backfile0 REZONING TRACKING SHEET Check List: Application Form Proffer Statement Impact Analysis Adjoiner List I(-Ib-IS i 911LO I ri Sys ID # File opened Fee & Sign Deposit _ Deed Plat/Survey _ Taxes Paid Statement Reference manual updated/number assigned D-base updated Copy of adjoiner list given to staff member for verification Color location maps ordered from Mapping Application Action Summary updated Planning Commission Meeting Board of Supervisors Meeting ACTION:►-� Oti<�% ACTION: C) Signed copy of Resolution received from County Administrator and placed in Proffers Notebook together Nvith proffers Approval (or denial) letter mailed to applicant/copy to file and cc's Reference manual updated D-base updated Application Action Summary updated File given to Mapping to update zoning map Zoning map amended Proffers recorded NOTES RECEIPT RECEIVED FROM 1- l ADDRESS I I a L Y'oLLV �ecjn -1-1-)() FORS{� f1 DATE NO. ACCOUNT HOW PAID AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH A,btT• PAID l' I��L/ IIS CHECK r BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER Y' 983269 _L b51 -- _/q ca3 `&q49- �Z001 FEDIFMM. C) 8 L81 8 COUNTY of FRF + DERICK i Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 x Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Telephone: 540/665-5651 FAX:540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Kathy Smith, Secretary DATE: January 22, 2016 SUBJECT: Sign Deposit The amount of $50.00 was deposited in line item #3-010-0191 10-0008 for First Bank on November 9, 2015. The $50.00 deposit represents a deposit for one sign for Freedom Manor Rezoning# 1 1-15. Patrick Sowers returned the sign on January 21, 2016, and is now entitled to the return of the $50.00 deposit. You may pay through the regular bill cycle. Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: First Bank 112 W. King St. Strasburg, VA 22657 S C/ks p e x T A X R E C E I P T FREDERICK COUNTY C. WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR P.O. BOX 225 WINCHESTER VA 22604-0225 SIGN DEPOSITS PLANNING PLANNING 11/6/15 Ticket #:00006990001 Date : 11/09/2015 Register: LJT/LJTA Trans. #: 05957 Dept # 1095 Acct# Previous Balance $ 50.00 Principal Being Paid $ 50.00 Penalty $ .00 Interest $ .00 Amount Paid $ 50.00 *Balance Due $ .00 Pd by PLANNING 11/6/15 Check 15504.15 # VARIOUS BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PENALTY/INTEREST THRU THE MONTH 11/2015 9 ,yam, �p RECF P� T RECEIVED FRO -_ DATE I a D(�- ^^ '40001 DRESS @@ NO• 9 8 3 2 C9 /2 015 JTA FOR F : i957 1p OF ACCOUNT r ` %• 1L r` ,� ` '� CCO - aCOUNT I4OW PAIn AMT CASH - PAID 1 Y ?,,Of ��v (� fi t' 4 5 4. BALANCE CHECK ( _ C,I•{1 �.. 15 MONEY 454 . � ------ _ ORDER 00 -.00 ©2001 ®8L818 t4 54 . 15 Pd by PLANNING 11/6/15 BALANCE DUE INCLUDES pgNp�1�, THRU .00 /INTEREST Check 15504.15 # VARIOUS THE MONTH 11/2015 I* r u COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 January 14, 2016 Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennom Associates, Inc. 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: REZONING M-15 FREEDOM MANOR PINS: 64-A-23, 64-A-20, and 64-A-19 Dear Patrick: This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of' Supervisors at their meeting on January 13, 2016. The above -referenced application was approved to rezone 33.6819 acres fi-onn the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers. The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644) in the Shawnee Magisterial District. The proffer statement, originally dated December 30, 2014, with final revision date of January 11, 2016, that was approved as a part of this rezoning application is unique to the above referenced properties and is binding regardless of' ownership. Enclosed is a copy of' the adopted proffer statement for your records. Pursuant to §165.102.0611, the County Attorney will present the written proffer to the Frederick County Clerk of Circuit Court for recordation. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of' this rezoning application. Sincerely, /,� - Candice Perkins, AICP, CZA Senior Planner CEP/kgs Attachment cc: Gene E. Fisher, Supervisor Shawnee District Lawrence Ambrogi and I -I. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Ellen Murphy, Commissioner of Revenue Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC., 1835 Valley Ave., Winchester, VA 22601 Rod Williams, County Attorney w/Proffer and Resolution 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • 0 REZONING APPLICATION #11-15 FREEDOM MANOR Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: December 30, 2015 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Senior Planner Staff Contact: John A. Bishop, AICP, Deputy Director -Transportation Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/02/15 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 01/13/16 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers. This application would enable the construction of up to 300 residential units. LOCATION: The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 01/13/16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The Freedom Manor Rezoning application seeks to rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers. Of the 33 acres of -existing RP zoned acreage, 26 acres was previously rezoned in 2005 under the same name of Freedom Manor. This application seeks to revise the proffers for the 26 acre portion tract (64-A-23) as well as include the acreage from parcels 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. This proposed development seeks to allow the construction of up to 300 residential dwelling units (Phase I - single family detached, Phase II - tOW1111oUse and multi -family units). The development has an overall density of 6.3 units per acre). Following a public hearing at their December 2, 2015 meeting, the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the Freedom Manor Rezoning request, with a recommendation that the Applicant provide interparcel access to the neighboring property to the east and consider a fence along the adjoining residential properties. The Applicant has since revised the proffer statement to provide an interparcel connection for the property to the cast. The Freedom Manor rezoning application is generally consistent with future land use designations of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan which provide guidance on the firture development of the property. A fcw elements of the rezoning application leave been identified that should be carefully evaluated to ensure that they fully address the impacts associated with this rezoning request. Following the required public hearing,, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the Board of Sllpel')'1Sol'y )t,olll(l be appl'oprlate. %Ile Applicalit Should be pl'epal'ed to adequately addre.ys all concerns raised by the Board of Sllpen,isors. 0 • Rezoning #!I 1-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Stnf f to provide ill fnl'lllat%on to the Planning Commission and the Board of'Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It play also be usef d to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues COl1Cel'/1111g this «ppI%Cllt%O/1 are noted lq staff'where I'BIG'Vllllt thl'Ol/g110[!t this Staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/02/15 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 01/13/16 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 33.6819 acres fi•om the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers. This application would enable the construction of up to 300 residential units. LOCATION: The properties are located east and adjacent to Palm -mill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet northwest of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 64-A-23, 64-A-20, and 64-A-19 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) District and RP (Residential Performance) District PRESENT USE: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RP (Residential Performance) RA (Rural Areas) South: RA (Rural Areas) East: RP (Residential Performance) RA (Rural Areas) West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant (Madison Village) Vacant/Agricultural Use: Shcnandoali Memorial Park Use: Residential Residential Use: Rcsiclential/Vacant/Agricultural Rezoning 1/11-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 3 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: VDOT's District Planning Section has completed their review of' the 2"" Submission of the Freedom Manor TIA. The TIA is in compliance with VDOT's TIA regulations (24 VAC 30-155) and we have no outstanding or additional comments that need to be addressed. We would like to provide the following recommendation on the proffers dated September 4, 2015, submitted with the TIA: • Update the references to "hiker/biker trail" in proffers 2.1 and 3.1 to "shared use path". • Update the minimum right-of-way dedication of' 56' from centerline in proffer 2.1 to 58' to accommodate the 10' wide shared use path, il'provided in the right-of-way. The provided 48' Width without the shared use path in the right -of' -way is adequate. • Correct the spelling error of Papermill Road in proffer 2.2. Fire Marshal: Plans Approved. Public NNIorks Department: We have completed our review of the site plan for the rezoning application for the proposed Freedom Manor Subdivision and offer the following comments: Refer to the Impact Analysis Statement: Add a paragraph dedicated to the discussion of stormwater. Refer to Page 4, Solid Waste: Expand the discussion to indicate that the residential development shall include the requirement for a private refuse hauler. Refer to the Proffer Statement, Page 3 of'4, Paragraph 6: Expand the discun ssioof the property owners' associate (POA) to include the requirements for maintaining open space and stormwater management facilities. In addition, the POA shall be responsible for a solid waste collection and disposal (i.e., curbside pickup, dumpster, etc.). Frederick CounO, Sanitation Authority: Please see attached lellerfirom Uive E. I47einclel, PE, elated January 20, 2015. Fred erick-Winclies ter Health Department: Health Department has no objection to the Rezoning request at this time. Department of Parks & Recreation: • Monetary proffers applied only to 75 of the proposed 100 detached units does not appear to meet impacts of the development. • The north/south hiker -biker trail recommended to follow the west side of connector road rather than property boundary as shown. This is to match the approved trail in Madison Village. • Hiker -biker trail recommended along east/west interparcel connector. Frederick County Public Schools: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Freedom Manor rezoning application submitted to us 011 January 16, 2015. We offer the following comments: Re-r_oning 1111-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Pagc 4 The cumulative impact of this development and other dcvcloplllcnts in Frederick County will require CO1lStrL1CtiO11 Of new schools and SUI)port facllitics to accommodate increased student enrollment. This development proposal includes a range Of possibilltics. The case that generated the Most Stl1CICIltS 1S 100 houses, 100 townhouses, and 100 apartments. We estimate that, in this case, the development will house 93 Students: 25 high School students, 23 middle school stuClents, and 45 elementary school stuClents. In order to properly serve these additional students, Frederick County Public Schools would spend an estimate S 1,048,000 more per year in operation costs (or $3,493 average per unit per year) and an estimated S3,891,000 in one-time capital expenditure (or $ 12,970 average per unit). You will find, enclosed Nvith this letter, a more detailed assessment of tlic estimated impact of Freedom Manor on FCPS, i1lCIUding attendance zone information. Frederick County Attorney: Please see allached lellerfi•oln Roderick B. i4,71liams, County A11orney, Baled Harch 2, 2015 Frederick County Inspection: Asbestos inspection/Abatement required for all buildings removed that were constructed prior to 1985. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. Furthermore, the majority of this property was previously rezoned in 2005. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic Structures located on the property nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in Shenandoah Valley does not identify a core battlefield within this area. Planniny, & Zollilgv: 1) Site Histor},: The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) identifies this property as being zoned R-1 (Residential Limited). The parcels were rc-mapped from R-I to A- 2 (Agricultural General) pursuant to the COunty'S conlprchensive downzoning initiative (Zoning Amendment Petition #01 1-80), which was adopted on October 8, 1980. The County's agricultural zoning districts were Subsequently combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance On May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A- I and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. Parcel 64-A-19 and a portion of parcel 64-A-20 were originally slated to be part of the Westwood Subdivision (Section B) and appeal - to retain their R-1/RP zoning designation. In 2002, Rezoning Application RZ#07-02, Doris F. Casey, was submitted to the County for a request similar to the 2005 Frcedom Manor Rezoning. The rezoning proposal requested the development of seventy (70) single family detached residential lots on 30.31 acres with access being via Route 522. At that time, the property had frontage on Route 522. Ultimately, the Board of Supervisors denied Rezoning Application 1107-02 on December 17, 2002. Oil August 0 • Rezoning 111 1-15 Freedom Manor December 30. 2015 Page 5 20, 2003 a Minor Rural Subdivision (Family Division) was approval e•cating the 26.87 acre parcel for PIN 64-A-23. On September 14, 2005 the Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning #09-05 of Freedom Manor which rezoned parcel 64-A-23 fi•om the RA District to the RP District with proffers. This rezoning was approved for 70 single family dwellings on 26.87 acres of land. 2) Comprehensive Police Plan: The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is all official I)Ublic CIOCLIMCIlt that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components Of community life. The primary goal of tills plain Is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. Land Use: The parcels comprising this rezoning application arc located within the COLulty'S Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The UDA defines the general area in which more intensive forms of residcntial development will occur. In addition, the Freedom Manor development is located within the Scnseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Scnseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan designates the area where this site is located with a residential land use (4 units per acre density) and a high -density residential land use (12-16 units per acre). Phase I of the project consists of 33.68 acres and is limited to 100 single family detached I-CSIdClltlal UI11tS, which WOUld be three L1111tS 1)C1' aCI-C. Phase II of the project consists of 13.66 acres and IS limited to a i11axin11.1111 of 200 single family attached Or multi -family units, which Would be 14.6 units per acre. While the density shown with the Freedom Manor rezoning is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan, there are no assurances that the area designated for high density residential will develop as indicated; there are no proffered minimum densities. Staff Note: While these densities and land uses are generally consistent with the coinprehenslve plan, there are no assurances that the area designated for high density residential will develop as indicated as there ai-e iio pi -of fe,i-ed iii1i111111iiiiS. Thedevelopment of Phase H with single fllnillj, attached (towiihouse) milts and multi- amily units does not assure densities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Transportation and Site Access: Initial access is gained to the site via a 1'OLl1ldabOL1t intersection with Papermill Road to be constructed by the Applicant. Future additional access shall be gained through inteparecl connections to the west and to the north at the Madison Village development. The transportation network also includes a I pedestrian trail along Papermill Road, and the internal public roads shown on the GDP and a trail that runs the length of the common boundary with the Shenandoah Memorial Park. Since the December 2, 2015 Planning Commission meeting, the Applicant has also proffered to provide an intcrparecl connection to the adjacent eastern property. • 9 Rezoning # 1 1-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 6 3) Site Suitability/Ciivii-oiimeiit: The site is currently vacant and contains two existing ponds; there are no floodplains On the property. The majority of the site drains fi'om west to cast. Soils on the site are identified as Blairton silt loams, Clearbrook channely silt loams and Weikert-Becks channery silt loams. Development of the property will be subject to the revised Stormwater Management regulations addressing both stornlwater quantity and quality. 4) Potential Impacts: A. Transportation "Traffic Impact Anah,sis. According to the included traffic impact analysis, at full build out (year 2026) the development is projected to generate 2,643 average daily trips (ADT) with all Studied nearby intersections expected to operate at level of service C or better with the proffered improvements. Transportation Progranl. Ill additioI1 to creating a I'OLlndabOLlt intersection with Papermill Road, the Applicant IS constructing a through road to Madison Village prior to the issuance of the 150°i building permit. This connection will offer alternative access in and out of the development via the Madison Village signal at Route 522. The Applicant will also be providing interparcel connection to the west and east. B. Sewer and Water The Applicant's Impact Analysis Statement projects that the development could produce up to 60,000 gallons per day Of sewage flow. An existing 8" sewer line within Westwood Drive would serve as the connection point for sanitary service for the property which flows to the Opegllon Wastewater Treatment facility. A pump station may be required to service the easternmost portions of the site. Water supply will be provided by way of an existing 8" water main extending from Westwood Drive to the property. C. Community Facilities The Applicant has prof%red a monetary contribution to conlnlunity facilities to offset the impact of the residential development. The amount per single family attached, and multi- family dwelling unit is consistent with the COunty's Development Impact Model values for 2015. It should be noted that the Applicant has reduced the proffer payment for the Single family detached units in recognition Of the existing 6.81 acres of unrestricted RP zoned land. The full proffer amount would be $19,680 per single family detached unit. The 6.81 acres could yield 20 units at the anticipated CIellSity Oftlll'ee LlllitS per acre (80 remaining units x $19,680 = $1,574,400 / 100 = $15,744). The Applicant has also proffered to allow Transferred Development Rights to pay for the monetary contribution specified in the proffer for any of the 300 dwelling units. • Rezoning 1l11-15 freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 7 Staff Note: The Applicant has reduced the proffer payment,for the single family detached units in recognition of the existing 6.81 acres of unrestricted RP zoned land. The.rill proffer amount would he $19,680 per single fiunily detached unit. The 6.81 acres could yield 20 units at the anticipated density of 3 units per acre (80 remaining unitsx $19,680 = $1,574,400/100 = $15,744). 5) Proffer Statement — Dateci December 30, 2014; revisal September 4, 2015, November 4, 2015, November 18, 2015, December 15, 2015: I) Site Development: 1.1 The cicvclopment is limited to 300 dwelling units; Phase I with up to 100 single family detached and Phase II with up to 200 clwclling units (single family attache(IMetachccl or multi -family). 1.2 The property shall be developccl in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan (GDP). 2) Transportation: 2.1 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the Applicant shall declicate right-of-way across the Papermill Road frontage in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right-o[=way as measured from the ccntcrline to provide for the future road improvements anci a hiker/biker trail. 2.2 Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first clwclling unit, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the property from Papermill Road as shown on the GDP. No acklitional site entrances shall be permitted on Papermill Roacl. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements prior to the issuance of a builcling permit for the 150°i dwelling unit: • Dcsign and construct the north/south connector roacl fi-om the Papermill Road entrance to the northern property limits to connect into Madison Village. • Dcsign and construct a public roadway to provicle an interparcel connection to the western property limits in the general location depicted in the GDP. This connection can occur with Phase I or Phase II. 2.4 The Applicant shall provide a right of way reservation area to the eastern boundary of the property, 56 feet in width an(i in the general location depicted on the GDP, to provide for a future connection between the internal street system for the property and the adjoining parcel. 3) Pedestrian/Biker Improvements: 3.1 Prior to the issuance of the 50"' builcling permit, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt path across the Papermill Road frontage and across the southern property boundary. 3.2 As part of the clesign and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt path From the site entrance on Papermill • 0 Rezoning Ill 1-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 8 Road to the northern properly limits linking into the adjacent development. 4) Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development: 4.1 For the single family detached dwelling Units the Applicant sliall pay $15,745 per unit. The Applicant shall pay $13,680 for each single family attached Unit and $ 1 3,880 for each apartment Unit. Staff Note: The Applicant has reduced the proffer p(gutent for the single f imily detached units in recognition Of the existing 6.81 ltcr'es of unrestricted RP Zoned land. Tlre.frlllproffer(rnrorurtivouldbe$19,680persirrgle.fllrrrily(letachedrnrit. The 6.81 acres could yield 20 units at the untleipated lleusrtl, of 3 units per acre (80 remaining units S19,680 = $1,574,400/100 = $15,744). 5) Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance: 5.1 The Applicant may utilize Transferred Development Rights to pay for the monetary contribution Specified in Proffer 4.1 for any of the 300 dwelling units. 6) Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association: 6.1 The property shall have a Properly Owners Association (POA) which is responsible for common areas, stormwater management facilities and solid waste collection and disposal. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start -Up fund for the POA in the amount of $5,000. 7) Landscape Buffer: 7.1 Prior to the issuance of tile 50°i dwelling unit, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens (minimum of 4 Iect tall, spaced 10 feet on center) along the common boundary with the Shenandoah Memorial Park. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FROM THE 12/02/15 MEETING: Staff reported this application is a proposal to rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers. It was noted of the 33 acres of existing RP zoned acreage, 26 acres of that was previously rezoned in 2005 Under the same name of Freedom Manor. Staff continued, the Applicant seeks to revise the proffers for the 26 acre portion tract (64-A-23) as well as include the acreage from parcels 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. Staff explained the proposed development seeks to allow the construction of up to 300 residential dwelling units. Staff presented the GDP (Generalized Development Plan) that was included with the application; it shows the site access which is the round-abOUt Oil Papermill Road, and the internal road network that would eventually connect into Madison Village to the nortli. Staff noted this project has no connection into the Westwood Subdivision. Staff elaborated that with a previous rezoning in 2005 there was a restrictive deed covenant entered into with the property owner and the County which prohibited the connection into the Westwood Subdivision road network. Staff reiterated that the initial access will be via a roundabout off of Papermill Road and future additional access would be provided through an Rezoning ill 1-15 FreedomManor December 30, 2015 Pagc 9 interparcel connection to the north at the Madison Village development which will be installed with the 150°i building permit. Staff continued the development includes a 10 foot pedestrian trail along Papermill Road; a trail along the internal public road and a trail along the boundary with Shenandoah Memorial Park and a monetary contribution to offset the impacts on the County front the residential development. Staff noted that for the multi -family and single family attached units the amount is consistent with the impact model, however, the single family ClctachCd UI11tS do have a reduced proffer payment which is due to the existing 6.8 acres of existing RP zoned land. It was also noted the Applicant has also proffered to allow the use ofTDR's (Transfer of Development Rights) in lieu of the monetary payment. Mr. Patrick Sowers of Pennoni Associates, representing the Applicant, came forward to offer further information on the property. Mr. Sowcrs reported there are three components to this project: on the south side there's approximately 26 acres that was rezoned In 2005 for 70 residential L11litS; north of that there is approximately 7 acres of existing historically zoned RP land; north of that there is approximately 13.5 acres of existing RA zoned land which is depicted in the Comprehensive Plan for high density residential use. The Applicant has proffered single family attached and multi -family uses in that area to ensure a higher yield to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Sowers continued that the remaining acreage to the South will be limited to single family detached uses which would be consistent with the adjoining properties. Mr. Sowcrs stated that the entrance to t11e property is being proposed as an offset roundabout and the ]'Cason Is to accommodate left tUrll 111oVC111Cl1t heading south on Papermill Road. l-Ie continued currently there is a 40 to 45 foot right-of-way for Papermill Road and that is not enough to build a left turn lane and still have through lanes to accommodate the transitions. Mr. Sowcrs noted the Applicant approached tie existing property owners to acquire additional right-of-way however, they respectfully declined. Therefore, the alternative was to construct an offset roundabout before any building permits are issued for the property. A Commissioner inquired if there would be any access to Westwood Drive from the property. Mr. Sowers commented no clue to the existing covenant that restricts this. A Commissioner inquired wily was the entrance along Route 522 eliminated. Mr. Sowers explained there was an optional agreement with the previous rezoning to acquire a right-of-way to have access through the property to the east, but that option has expired. Mr. Sowers continued, stating that when looking at access it was reviewed fi-om Papermill Road and also from an access management standpoint that VDOT would preferred not to have another access point on Route 522 since it is designated as an arterial roadway. A Commissioner asked If there was just going to be one way in and one way out. Mr. Sowers explained there will initially be the access fi-onl Papermill Road and the applicant has proffered the road networks and road -about. Mr. Sowers continued ultimately there will be access through Madison Village and they are proffering an additional interparcel connector to the western property boundary. Chairman Wilmot called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. Mr. Tom Breedlove came forward and expressed his concerns with traffic on Papermill Road. He voiced his concerns with water runoff and the high number of drain fields located in this area. Ms. Carol Manuel who lives on Westwood Drive came forward with her concerns of drainage, water runoff, and the traffic impacts along Papermill Road. Ms. Barbara Metcalf of the 0 i Rezoning l/ 1 1-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 10 Shawnee Magisterial District expressed her concern with the traffic impacts and what type ofbUffer will be provided. Mr. Sowers addressed the citizen concerns. I-Ie explained in regards to drainage there is an existing pond along the frontage of the property and on the northern portion of the property there is a high point that drains to another pond. He noted the project will not be generating any increased runoff. Mr. Sowers discussed the traffic concerns. He explained Papermill Road is on the Comprehensive Plan as a major collector. lie Continued this project can essentially funnel traffic Nvithin the roadways of Route 522 and Papermill Road. Mr. Sowers noted the roundabout will slow traffic leading to the existing signal at Route 522 and Papermill Road. In regards to buffers, Mr. Sowers explained with single family detached uses adjacent to another single family detached the ordinance does not require a buffer. A Commissioner clarified the development will not release more water rather than generate more water. Mr. SOWCrs conflrllled that was correct. The Commissioner commented O11 ]laving all internal stl'eet stubbed off towards Route 522 so iftwo parcels do get developed it provides another route to get in and out. He Noted a buffer such as a six foot fence should be considered. A Commissioner inquired about the Option t0 use I DR's for the project. Mr. Sowers explained it is preluded to have the option available and thel-C al-C 110 1111I11CdlatC I)larlS t0 use it. The Commissioner asked what would be an instance that would trigger it to be used. Mr. Sowers elaborated if a property was to become available and the TDR's could be obtained. A Commissioner Noted the storm water I"CgUlations are in place and with tllCSC 1'CgUlatlons It Should handle the drainage. He is in favor of this application with the recommendation that the Applicant looks at providing interparcel access to the neighboring property to the east and considers a fence along the adjoining residential properties. A motion was made, seconded, and 11I1animoUsly 1'CcOnimcnded for approval with the recommendation that the Applicant provides interparcel access to the neighboring property to the Cast and considers a fence along the adjoining residential properties. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 01/13/16 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The Freedom Manor Rezoning application seeks to rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers. Of the 33 acres of existing RP zoned acreage, 26 acres was previously rezoned in 2005 under the same name of Freedom Manor. This application seeks to revise the proffers for the 26 acre portion tract (64-A-23) as well as include the acreage froin parcels 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. This proposed development seeks to allow the const►•uction of up to 300 residential dwelling units (Phase I - single family detached, Phase II - townhouse and multi -family units). The development has an overall density of 6.3 units per acre). FolloNving a public hearing at their December 2, 2015 meeting, the Planning Commission voted UIlaI1imously t0 recommend approval of the Freedom Manor Rezoning request, with a recommendation that the Applicant provide interparcel access to the neighboring property to the cast and consider a fence Rezoning 111 1-15 Freedom Manor December 30, 2015 Page 11 along the adjoining residential properties. The Applicant has since revised the proffer statement to provide an interparcel connection for the property to the cast. The Freedom Manor rezoning application is generally consistent with future land use designations of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Arcas Plan which provide guidance on the future development of the properly. A few elements of the rezoning application have been identified that should be carefully evaluated to ensure that they fully address the impacts associated with this rezoning request. Pollowin- the required public healing, a decision regarding this rezoning application bl' the Board of'SupervisoLs would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board ol'Superi,isors. Pennoni PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS December 16, 2015 Candice Perkins, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Planning and Development 107 N Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Freedom Manor — Revised Proffer Statement Dear Candice. r� Please find attached a revised proffer statement and associated generalized development plan, both dated December 15, 2015, for the Freedom Manor rezoning application. We have modified the proffer to address the recommendation made by the Planning Commission to provide for an interparcel connection to the eastern property boundary. The revised proffer statement includes the addition of Proffer 2.4 which provides for a 56 foot wide right of way reservation area to enable a future street connection from the internal street system serving Freedom Manor to the parcel(s) located immediately east of the site. As proffered, the right of way would be dedicated within 90 days of receiving written request from the County and at no cost to the County. Other changes to the proffer statement were limited to a new revision date and an updated date reference for the generalized development plan. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (540) 667-2139. Sincerely, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. Patrick Sowers Senior Project Engineer Attachments 117 East Piccadilly Street • Winchester, VA 22601 • Ph: 540-667-2139 • Fx: 540-665-0493 www pennons com • Post Office Box 1877 Winchester Virginia 22604-8377 January 20, 2015 do FREDEMCK COUNTY SAMTA TIIONAUTHORUY Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 I'll. — (540)868-1061 Fax — (540)868-1429 wIvw.fcsa-watcr.com Ref.: Rezoning Plan Comments Adjacent to Papermill Road Tax Map # 64-A-23, 64-A-20 & 64-A-19 Dear Sir: Uwe E. wcindel, P.E. Engineer -Director Per your request, a review of the proposed rezoning plan has been performed. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority offers comments limited to the anticipated impact/effect upon the Authority's public water and sanitary sewer system and the demands thereon. The parcel is in the water and sanitary sewer area served by the Authority. Based on the location both water service and sanitary sewer service is available within a reasonable distance from the site. Sanitary sewer treatment capacity at the waste water treatment plant is also presently available. Sanitary sewer conveyance capacity and layout will be contingent on the applicant performing a technical analysis of the existing sanitary sewer system within the area to be served and the ability of the existing conveyance system to accept additional load. Please be aware that multiple pump stations will be used for conveyance of waste from this site. Likewise, water distribution capacity will require the applicant to perform a technical analysis of the existing system within the area to be served to determine available capacity of both the potable water system and the ability to provide fire Protection.. Water and sanitary sewers are to be constructed in accordance with the FCSA standards specifications. Dedicated easements may be requires and based on the layout vehicular access will need to be incorporated into the final design. All easements should be free from any encumbrance including permanent structures (fences, signs, etc.) and landscaping (trees, shrubs, etc.). Please be aware that the Authority does not review or comment upon proffers and/or conditions proposed or submitted by the applicant in support of or in conjunction with this application, nor does the Authority assume or undertake any responsibility to review or comment upon any amended proffers and/or conditions which the Applicant may hereafter provide to Frederick County. Thank you; *wE.Weindel, PE Engineer -Director \VATP:K'S N1'ORTII IT 0 ! COUNTY of FREDERICK Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: rwillia@co.frederick.va.us March 2, 2015 VIA FACSIMILE — (540) 665-0493 — AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates Inc. 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Application — Freedom Manor Tax Parcel Numbers 64-A-19, 64-A-20, and 64-A-23, consisting of 47.5415t acres (the "Properties") Proposed Proffer Statement dated December 30, 2014 Dear Patrick: You have submitted to Frederick County for review the above -referenced proposed proffer statement (the "Proffer Statement") for the proposed rezoning of the Properties, in the Shawnee Magisterial District, from the RA (Rural Areas) and RP (Residential Performance) Zoning Districts to the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District, subject to proffers. I have now reviewed the Proffer Statement and it is my opinion that the Proffer Statement would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following comments: In Proffer 1.1, for clarity, it may be best to revise the last sentence to read as follows: "Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units, which may be single family detached units, single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof, except that single family detached units shall not be included in Phase 2 unless such units are constructed utilizing the County's Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance as provided for by Proffer 5.1." • For the non -monetary proffers, namely those in Proffers 2 and 3, it may be appropriate for the trigger to be some event earlier than issuance of certificate of occupancy. Otherwise, as to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, that already 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 0 0 Mr. Patrick Sowers March 2, 2015 Page 2 frequently occurs only shortly before closing of the sale of the respective housing unit to the ultimate purchaser. Making issuance of a certificate of occupancy contingent on fulfillment of the non -monetary proffers increases the risk that the need for completion of such obligations could interfere with a then -imminent closing. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific development, as my understanding is that that review will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. Sincp4y, A B. Williams y Attorney cc: Candice B. Perkins, AICP, Senior Planner (via e-mail) f`r 6 *146 63D �a Applications Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area Building Footprints 131 (Business. Neighborhood District) B2 (Business. General Distrist) 83 (Business. Industrial Transition District) EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) HE (Higher Education District) M1 (Industrial. Light District) M2 (Industrial. General District) MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) MS (Medical Support District) OM (Office - Manufacturing Park) R4 (Residential Planned Community District) R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) RA (Rural Area District) RP (Residential Performance District) 6` - 61DA J R4■ ND•A.1 ,-AVE All � 64 2/A• NDAS N2/ iNli a 6a 61DA9� ■ N2A1 ND A e 6 ■ ND A II Cl642A2 642 ND A 10 ■ 64riC • ■ 64D A I2 ND 8 1 86A ND 8 ti6 I67 1, 61D•At7 _ II 64D A I6� � , 61D AT18 64D 8 1 68 641 11 I ND A 1.9 � 8 1 69 I i61D 3IA 8 ND ND At20 61D ■� A 22 61DJe� 610A21 • 61D,8 61D A 23� 6' 61D A IS 640 A 26 2 A 3 ■ 64D MD�2 61Dd 2 e l l A 1 6.I.D.4 610 A 28 �64D A` 27 64D n , , eti■ winchd N ,•, , Nate: REZ # 1 1 - 15 Frederick County Dept of Planning Developments Freedom Manor 107 07 N Kent St PINS: Suite 202 64 - A - 19. 64 - A - 20. 64 - A - 23 Winchester. VA 22601 Rezoning from RA/RP to RP with Proffers 540 - 665 - 5651 Map Created: November 10. 2015 Staff: cperkins 0 220 440 880 Feet R E Z # 11 - 15 6/�•2 1 Z"A4d } 64 A lea'' 1 Freedom Manor 6d DA1 3 ■ °2 y,. M A 11 `�,,?�i JND A•2i•' _.- "` 64 A a 1 � PINS: %� 61DA3 64 - A - 19,64 - A - 20,64 - A - 23 bdo•A!'!~� •• Rezoning from RA/RP to RP with Proffers ��` adcA s R ;64 2 64D A 7 ; a. . . 4t.''.sA 1 610 A_Li,1r 642A1 r t ,;k • r, f' 1�f?I• �• ;t. 64DA8 H' • ,�.t�l �6-4�2+� Vol IV V•' '�f -.i?I l+ii:•64DA 14 �. T ww t 20 4. c64D8 { J� r`►Il. ,. v 1-'„�+t f r � � ' + 4 d� 61D A 15 _ 61r6, i 1 TA 2 A I I. 6dD 6d01A 16 1 0 _• 2 a 11 � A A 64D /I��1� 5 ,�.. • • r 610 2 -'A 13 ND J19 �'S61D,y • 63D 1 2 8 1 69 + ;� 164D 2 _ 63D"`3 ".'� 61.q .DNA 8�.• • , A Id • 6pD 3 A _ 64DvA 20 * ( f ►63p��j 21A �'}'•61r O [64D2 6403'6 6/0A21li 1 64D 8 63D 1;� ' • .i_ .Yr.- �F A�i = i A 15 ,,%Y� f f 06d0+�5 1 86J' if \ 6dD A 23 P!R 64D A 24 ■ 1 . 63D 1►7 A 63 A IK 641A 19 640 V1 6dD • • r 64, f 61�11+� 2415 ,I 2A3 61 t + yy v 61D lam" r 63D 1� 64D1 6302101 _ f . 8A �2A6 rA1 Sf '. •61D� 6102 gtlil, 2 12 �2!• 4 • .►.. 64b AI 64D . ,• 6301r _ i '•' ' / F.�w.-. cL 75 r.1 ;! 8 1 IA 1211j 6 D r� .r ., 63D 2 13j.63D2r11 y 61D�A�� ba a r'2 63C!- 7 - 2j 4�S _J W.YS iIUIFUFJ )D,,,2o{{{ 919, - y t W _ . • 61 A 23AI�, 1':• " } I , • ��, 64D •,� . 'y 42 164D �446 61A21 •. "' Of 64 -- `64_A25 rl rppi,cations Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area Building Footprints Long Range Land Use O Residential ,s? i.' Neighborhood Village Urban Center • Mobile Home Community Business 0 Highway Commercial Mixed -Use 0 Mixed Use Commercial!Offtce 0 Mixed Use Industrial/Office Industrial ® Warehouse Heavy Industrial Extractive Mining Commercial Rec Rural Community Center ® Fire & Rescue Q Historic ® Institutional - Planned Unit Development Or/,, Park Recreation School Employment Airport Support Area O B2/83 Q Residential 4 u/a OHigh -Density Residential. 6 u/a OHigh -Density Residential. 12-16 u/a ORural Area Interstate Buffer Landfill Support Area Natural Resources & Recreation • Environmental & Recreational Resources �- 4•iZ-III: -4 �w Oftb ♦1A1 Cl REZO^11-155 ,s l4 =I r ff ENTLEY A rAV Ej 522 %f?'?? C DJIJti SOUTI Subd 1 me MEMORIAL Note: REZ # 11 - 15 Frederick County Dept of Planning Development Manor 107 N Kent 51 PINS; Suite 202 64 - A - 19, 64 - A - 20, 64 - A - 23 Winchester. VA 22601 Rezoning from RA/RP to RP with Proffers 540 - 665 - 5651 Map Created: November 10, 2015 Staff: cperkins 0 255 510 1,020 Feet • i PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015; November 4, 2015; November 18, 2015; December 15, 2015 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised December 15, 2015. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. i Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. 2. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papermill Road in the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 150'h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: • The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Said interparcel connection may be constructed within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 area of the Property. 2.4 The Applicant shall provide a right of way reservation area to the eastern boundary of the Property, 56 feet in width and in the general location depicted on the GDP, to provide for a future connection between the internal street system for the Property and the adjoining parcel(s). Said right of way shall be dedicated, at no cost to Frederick County, within 90 days of receiving written request from Frederick County. (See 1 on GDP) Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. Page 2ofs Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path to extend from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to link trail facilities planned for the adjoining development as depicted on the GDP. 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 4.1 For any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library $354 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,745 $13,680 $13,880 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. Page 3or5 Proffer Statement 7. Landscape Buffer Freedom Manor 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 4 of 5 a • Proffer Statement Respectfully submitted, Shen-ValleyX'�nd Voldi Dennis A. Date: December l Freedom Manor STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: -I r, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ff,—o • , 2015, by My commission expires { 3 ao I I Notary Public-��-G�-� Page 5 or 5 Daborah F. Bty Commonwealth of Virginia Y Notar Public f. `{+� t�b!',p, j Commission No. 360532 „= '.Iv Ccmm ssicn Expires 04/30/2017 i 1� ,n Madison f\ Village Road and 10' Trail Connection to Madison Village 1 1 a Trail C n to j 8 A-145 � p - 2 JL -per/g i I ' Proposed ' to' Trail ' at dod e North/South 10' Trail ' Connector Road 1 1 rs* Proposed ` P -� Proposed Roundabout Proposed 10' Trail Evergreen / Screen A Reserva roposed iOr iIIt /n Dedication Bonn Shenandoah Memorial Park SUBJECT PROPERTY\ FREEDOM MANOR oGeneralized Development Plan CJ1 FREDERICK COUNTY, KRGIN14 J Ezisting I I Signal - PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: December 2, 2015 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 13, 2016 - ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING # 11-15 FREEDOM MANOR WHEREAS, Rezoning #11-15, of Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC, submitted by Pennoni Associates to rezone 33.6819 acres Prom the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers, final revision date December 15, 2015 was considered. The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). The properties are further identified with PIN(s) 64-A-23, 64-A-20 and 64-A-19 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on December 2, 2015 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors field a public hearing on this rezoning on January 13, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers, final revision elate December 15, 2015. The conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner are attached. PDRes 401-16 0 • -2- This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 13th day of January, 2016 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. DeI-Iaven, Jr., Chairman Robert A. Hess Gene B. Fisher Blaine P. Dunn PDRes 901-16 Gary A. Lofton Robert W. Wells .Judith McCann -Slaughter A COPY ATTEST Brenda G. Garton Frederick County Administrator Action: PLANNING ('01MI ISSION ImARI) OF AIA[RUSORS A N1P,N1)IN11t,NT .lul), 6, 2005 Rcconlnlendcd Approval September 14, 2005 APPROVI') Fl) AN ORD]NANCI? AN/11 ND1NCi TONING DIS'I'R]C_( MnP RT,%ONING 1109-05 01" VRJ- 1;1_)ONl N/1AN(-)R �VIIERV S, RtwoAng U0905 of hr"dom Ninnor, was submitted to rei.otlr MJ6 7 acres from RA (Rural .bens) I)istricl to IZP (Residential I'erf�)rnrulce) District for 70 An& WAY detached humes. Ile property fronts on the east side of Papernlill Road Okutc 6441 approximately 000 TO west noril"Vest of the intersection of, Papermill IZoacl (Route 6,14) and Front Royal I'ike (Route 522). in the Shavvrlee t\5gisterial District, and is identified by I'rupcOy Identilleatinn Nunlher (PIN) 64-A-23. N1/1-1I?R7-11ASI the Planning Commission held a puldic heal'Og on (Ills rumling cm My 6, 2005; and \V l I? RDAs, the Board of Supervisors held a public llea% on this romoninp on SCptelrlber 14, 2005; and \�1�11r,RF,AS, tile. Frederick County Board ofSupond ul's finds the Approval of this rci.unhg to be in the best interest of' the public healtht safcty, welfare, and Ill Coll forl11a11CC with the Comprehensive Policy flan; NOti`', THEREFORE, 13E rr ORDAINI D by tile Frederick C'ounty 13oard ofstipervisors thlll Chapter 165 of the lhvdeck �.'(lnd unq Code, %ling, is amended to ""ise file %olllll� rlI)1511'ICl 1\frll) IO chmgc 26.57 acres front IZ:1 (Rural Areas) District to Rl' (Residential Perfornl'lnee) District for 70 sogie I'n A Y doac•hed homem as described by the applic:llion and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voltlnlarily proffered in wriling by the apphc; I and the property umer. I'I)R, 03305 0 This ordinance shall be in effect on the, date of adoption. Passed this loth day of September, 2005 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Ayg— Barbara E. Van Osten Ave . Gina A. Forrester Nay Gwy Dove Aye Lynda J. Tyler Nay Bill A Ewing Aye Gene Fisher PURL% 433-0 Aye A COPY A'rTES'f John R. Riley.'Jr. Frederick County Administrator E 0 -il venway Engioecrint; �laV 2 , 7.00•I; 1(c wised July 28, 20Ik1 Freedom \Manor Rezuninl; October 7, 2004; 1:61-uary 25, 2005 Niny 18, 2005; We 16, 200S July 15, 2005; Aulcust 10, 2005 FRT?I?I)OM kj,1N0�1Z PIZQll,l,'lli'R STATE, REZONING: RZ8 09-05 Rural Areas (RA) District to l�esidentlal Pat fo►'lllancc (RP) District PROPERTY: 2&87-acres -1-7- (here -in after the "PROP RTY") Tax Parcel 6-,I-((A))-23 RECORD OWNER: Steve A. Du13rlICIOr ct als APPLICANT: Steve A. DuBmdcr at als (herein after the "APPLICANTS") PROJECT i\►AIVIL: 1'RII?UUl\I MANOR ORIGINAL, DATE May 29, 2004 OF PROFFERS: REVISION DATE: August 10, 2005 Prclirlirat•1 JAVIatters Plll'SUant to Section 15.2-2296 It. Seq, of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as anicnded, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Oallnance wilh respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Applicants hereby proffer that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application 11 09-05 for the rezoning of 26.870acres front the Rural Areas (RA) District Residential Perfor1nancc (RP) District, cicvelopnlcrt of the subject property shall be done in coulbrniity with the tarts and conditions set Moll herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applieant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accor(lance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be (learned withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever, sense pent, shall be binding upon these Applicants and their legal successors, hairs, or assigns. The subject properly, identified as Freedom Manor, and mare particularly described as the lands owned by Stew A, DuBrucler at als, being all of Tax Map Parcel 644(A))-23. The property is sho"m by plat and survey dated January 9, 2002 and revised July 24, 2003, prepared by Mark D. Smith, I..S., of Grecnway lbiginecring, entilled "final Plat for Minor Rural Subdivision of the: Land Standing in the Manic of Doris F. Casey" and I'ccoided as Instruniw" Number 030029417. Fire 43230;ruVNV E Gr,:emV ay Fnl!incvrirlg May 2S, 004; Revised July 2S, Nod I:recdom ,Manor kczonintt (Wher 7, 2001 February 25, 2005 may 18, 2005; June 16, 200 July 15, 2005; Augur( 10, 2005 A. Generalized Development Plan The Applicants hereby proffer to develop the Properly in substantial conforulity with (lie Generalized Development Plan prepared by Greenway Aginecring and dated W20/05, a copy of which is attachcl, 'rho Ciencralked Development Plan is intended to delineate the road systems that will serve the 70 single-laillily dwadwd urban lots, the general loealion of road efficiency buffer, the Shenandoah Nlcilxlrial Park butte)', and the bicycle and pedestrian trail facility. l3. llesidential Use lZestrictioll 1. Ile Applicants hcrcby proffer Uml Me Pmpw*ty shall be used for the development of Single-family Detached Urban Residences only, and all other housing types otherwise pernlitted in the RI' zoning district shall be prohibited, developed as AnWeAnNy detached urban residential lots. 2. Ile Applicants hereby proffer to linlit the total nuulbcr of'singlc-family detached dwelling units to 70 on the Properly. (, l'1'lln5p01'(atlo)l 1. Site Access The Applicants hereby proffer to provide access to the Property through the construction of a primary entrance on Papernlill Road (Route 644) and a secondary entrance on front Royal Pike (Route 5221 The Applicants shall be responsible fi)r the construction of the internal lend improvements and for the construction of all off -site improvements located on Tax Map Parcel 6zl-((A))- 23A. The internal road l)llprOvcmcnts and construction of till off -site improvements located on Tax Map Parcel 611•-((A))-23A shall be constructed to base asphalt and open fir public use prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the l'recdolll I'lanor Subdivision. l:urthermore, the Applicants shall provide Ica' a temporary cul-de-sac at the northern property boundary to allow for future inter -parcel connection to 'fax N,lap parcel 64-A-19. The entrances, internal road system and temporary cul-do-sac described above are depicted on the proffered Gelleraliml Development Plan exhibit Ior Freedom Manor, 2. "Traffic Calming Measures and Route 522 Connection 'The Applicants hereby proffer to implement a curvilinear street design !or the internal street system serving the 2187-acre site to discourage cut through traffic between front Royal Pike (Route 522 South) and Papermill Road (Route 644). l-nrlhermore, the Applicants hereby proffer to design a traffic chocker flor iv%,iew and approval by VDO'T, and tiler' construct the traffic choker between the front Royal Pike entrance and (lie residential lots that will be located on 'fax 1Vlap File ::3210 GA1v 2 r-I LA LJ Greenway I{nz inrering May 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 Fwedcnn Moncu Remining Dember 7, 2001 I'Mary 25, 2005 May 18. 2005; June 16, 200.5 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 Parcel 6=}-((A))-23A. Additionally, a right turn and taller lane will be dcsigncd and constructed to this entrance Mhin the [Front Royal Pike right-of-way that will be open fbr public use prior to the issuance of the first building pernlil within the Freedom Nlanor Subdivision. 3. I linlination of 1Vcstwood Drivc Co r"lcction The Applicants hereby proflcr that they will not make a road connection to Westwood Drivc (Route 822). ']'his guarantee will be achiCVCd through a deed restriction upon the pertinent property, identified as Tax Map 64-((A))-19 and currently owned by the Applicants, a copy of which is attached, The Applicants will legally record this road connection restriction within 30 days of final rezoning approval and prior to any development activity on the Properly to ensw'c that this restriction appears in the chain of this An Tax Nlap parcel 64YO 19. }. Paperinill Road Dedication The Applicants proffer a right-of-way dedication oftwenly-feet in width along the entire Paperrnill Road frontage on the Properly. 5. Off'site Road Contribution 'Ile Applicants hereby proflcr to contribute seven thousand dollar's ($7,000) per Unit 1,61. offsite road iinpro vclnollts to PapCl'llllll Road, including the i'calignillent Of the Papernlill Road and Front Royal Pike intersection and other associated Papernlill Road irnprovelments. The contribution will be paid to the TrCasul'CI' of' Frcdcrick County, Virginia Col. each residential lot That is platted. This monetary contribution is to be paid at the t1111c of the Ndkhng pcl'llllt issuance An each residential lot. 6. Revenue Sharing All of the monies paid pu►swuA to above item 5, Papernlill Road Inlprovcnlents, together %Ath the property value of land dedicated as public road right-Olkway through above item 4, Papernlill Road Dedication shall be eligible Ibr il]CIusion in the Frederick County contribution to an applicable highway Impl'Ovelllcut reVe1111e sharing pro.jcet. ll, Shenandoah Melllorial Park Buffer Tllc Applicants hereby proffer to provide a fifty -foot (50') blIClcr along the entire southern property line against the Shenandoah I Mcnwrial Park. The fifty -foot (50') buffer will not contain any portion of residential lots developed within the Property. A fence that is a nlininlum of six feet (G') in height, resembling a traditional iron fence style for cenlelery enclosures will be constructed within the File i-'3230/I-A%V C� Orccuway Alay 28, 200,1; Revised .luly 28, 2004 Freedom tvianor Rczmlill. October 7, 2011; February 2.5, 2005 May IS, 2005; We 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 buffer Along the shared Shenandoah M n octal Park properly line. A bicycle and pcdcslrian trail facility will be constructed within a twenty -foot (20') 11011- exclusive easement, located adjacent to this fence. In the remaining thirty -loot (301 portion of the buffer, a single row of evergreen trees will be planted on tell - foot 001 centers. I41. I'llpel•Illiff Road (Route 644) And LfAdeney 13nRer Easement \,\Iitflin the 1•cy1.1ired road Mciency butler the applicants hereby proflcr to provide a twenty -foot (20') non-exclusive casement lot• the developmelit or a bicycle and pedestrian lacility within the established fifty -loot (50') road efficiency butler along Papernlill Road (Route 644). ► . Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility The Applicants hereby proflcr to construct a ten -fool 00, We asphall hicycle and pedestrian facility within the twenty -foot (2.0') non-exclusive casement as stated in Proffers D and E above. 'file maintenance of this ficility Shall initially be the responsibility of the 110111mvncrs' association, lend will be available for dedication to the Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation if requested in writing by Frederick County. C. IYlonetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Devclopnlent The undersigned owners of tilt above described properly hereby voluntarily proflcr that in the event rezoning application N 0115 is approved, tilt; undersigned will pay to the "treasurer o1' I rcdcrick County, Virginia S9,545 Im each residential lot (flat is plaLtcd. This monetary contribution is to be paid at the Bale of the building permit issuance lbr each residential lot, IL llonetal•y C:onirfbudon to Establish Ilurneowners' AssociatWil Fund The Applicants hereby proflcr to establish a start-up fund for the Freedom 1N/lanor Homeowner's Association (FNII-IOA) in the amount of',$500.00 flor each platted lot within the freedom \'Iallor C011111111111ty, ol" which the assessment fill. each platted lot is to be collected at (Ile that of Illltlill trallsfCl' of title and to be directed to the FMHOA fund, Language will be incorporated into the MINA Decd of Dedication and Restrictive Covenant Document (flat ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the developer to the FMHOA. The start-up funds (or the FM-10A shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all implY1 malts wllhln die cornmoll Opel( Space al-Cas, liability insurance, street light assesslllents, and Inoperly 111anagenlent and/or legal fees. rile?:32301CAw • \J Greenway Engineering 1.) Signatures May 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 October 7, 2004; February 25, 2005 May 18, 2005, June 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 !'recdom Manor Rezoning The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the applicant and owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Steve A. DuBrueler By: --�= By: R?Xy N. DuBrueler By: ,� t1� I Madeline F. DuBrueler Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of t'�z A'e , C , C' I(-- To Wit: Date Date Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of j jh r , 20 by Ok�i ''i—i I'r.ir' +%" L,� r. Nota >u �lic My Commission Expires File, 4323W AW 5 S vc .!k 64-((A))-25 - ----- nor. lie CJHCKER Laurchvood Drive C2 z w M. a. of-- 0 -i z w Fo LU TX 2 - 2O Lu - OZ' LU a_ UJ < LU z ui i i Tax Map ID: 64q(A)hl9 Prepared by Sean A. Everhart, PLC and Return to: 158 Front Royal Pile, Suite 305C VAnAosler, Virginia 22602 DECA,ARATION OF ICES"I'IZ1CI'1VI? COVENANT THIS DL;CLARATIN OF 10 STRIC'TIVI COVE-NANI' is made this 26`r' day of Scl)tcnlber, 2005, by and among Steve A. DLI13RL1EI.j,R, Ray N. DURRUTLER, and Madeline 1". DUI3RUELL'R (hereinafter refcrrcd to as "Declarants"), the COMAY OF FITE E'RICK, vlrglnla (hereinafter 1•cfer-red to as "County"), FIIZS`C' I3,AN1{, a Virginia I3;rnitiuf Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "BM), and Stephen G, I3U_I I,,i_R`1'lZC1S`hrr (hereinafter refcrrcd to as "Trustee'). \N1 I TN E SSI `I H: i\'I-IEREAS, Declarants are the fee simple owners of certain real properly lying and being situated ttivo miles south of the City of \\Jinchcstcr, in ShaNNfnce Nlaf;istcrial District, I'rederick County, Virginia, containing 2.2021 acres, name or less, and fualler identified as "fax Parcel No. 64- A-19 (the "Properly"); WHEREAS, Declarants desire to impose a restrictive covenant on the Property regarding access to Route 822 (\Vcstwood DrlVc); WHEREAS, Bank is the beneficiary of two Notes, cash secured partially or wholly by the Property, and evidenced by two deeds Of' trust recorded as Instrument Numbers 020018297 (modified in Instrument 040024652) and 050005350 among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia, and Trustee being the UTIStCC under afor•estrid deeds of trust; N0\V, THEREFORE, Declarants hereby impose on the Property the f6llowinz; restrictive covcrranL At such time tale Frederick Cowlty Board of Supervisors approves the Frcedorn Manor Proffer Statement and Generalized Development Plarr to allow for an inter - parcel connection that will provide access to the Property: (1) there shall be no entrances from or across the Properly from Route 822 (Westwood Drive) and (2) there shall be no access across the Property to Route 822 fbr fhc benefit of any olhm property and no otlicr property shall have access across [Ile Properly to Route 822. 'l Ills Rcshictrve C,ovenarlt shall run to the benefit of, and be enforecable by, the County. This Restrictive Covenant shall run with, and be appurtenant to, the Property, and shall be binding upon the Declarants, then' hens, personal represmitatives, successors, and assigns. The Bank and Trustee join in the execution of tllis Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to evidencc their consent and approval of the placement ofthe mstrict% cmanarlt on the Properly. Pago 1 of 5 0 WITNI SS TI-1.1 FOLLOM"ING SIGNATURE(S) AND S1=;A1. (S): �Stcve A. DuBrucicr Ray N. 1)ul3rucicr Madeline F. DuBl-L1CICI- COMMON1V[?AL,•I'1-1 OF VIRGINIA COUNTY Or FREDEJUCK, to Nvit: 'I'hc foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the albrelllCnLloned jlll-iSd1Ct1011, by Steve A. llul3rueler, Ray N. DuBrucler, and nladelinc F. I)uBrllcicr, tliis 3_1` clay oLSelyt'imil-m-, 2005, 1cGc l� Ot8r)l PUbhC �- ✓ ``````pi11111111�41111'/i My Commission hxpires: J JS G.� d�,.1407ARYPUBLIC�= k-11 Page 2 of 5 Y'IRST BANl , a Virginia Banking Corporation I3y:_1-_LLi(51=,AI_.) Earl W. 1"oreman, Vice President COMN,[ONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive CQVenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction, -by Earl W, Foreman, Vice President of First Bank, a Virginia Banking Coq)mmdml, this too. day of September, 2005, Notary Public My Commission Expires: Jb-e" � o _ WIT ,Gim i jg > = PilUL1C F` ro}AAfOrJ4YPA1:l'}{ Pago 3 of 5 Cam% Stephen G. Autler, Tnistee CO?vIMONWESAL TII Or VIRGINIA Cll,y Or WINCR STEER, to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowlcd-cd before me, it Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction, by Stephen G. Butler, TrIlstec, this ; day of September, 2005. Notary Public My Commission Expires: 0131 d(0 i Pa0v 4 of 6 0 9 COUNTY OF I REDY'R1C.'K,VIRGINI-A i .loh�R. Riley.jr., County . dn1111151r�1101' COMMONAVEALTI-I OF VIIZGINIA CITY O1. WINC1-ILST1?R, to Nvit: "fhe foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction, by John R. Riley Jr., County Adnuinist"Iltor for Ole County of Frederick, Virginia, this .� ti day oft&upt(-»llbc-r, 2005. A 6 e t k. i Public ,M), Commission l.xpiris: _ ��I�� ��- )-0-Olcl Pago 5 of 5 0 • • REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA To be completed by Planning Slaf Zoning Anicnclnicnt Niurlbcr 11- 1 5 PC I-Iearing Date ie� - a - 15 Fee Amount Paid $ Date Received ►1I� 15 BOS Hearing Date i ld The.following iiilbi•mation shall be provided by the applicant: All pal-ccl identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Sheet, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: Pennoni Associates c/o Patrick Sowers Telephone: 540-667-2139 Address: 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 2. Property Owner (if different than above): • Name: Shen -Valley Land Holdings LLC Tcicphonc: 540-667-8300 Address: 1835 Valley Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 3. Contact person if other than above: Name: Tcicphonc: 4. Property Information: a. Property Identification Number(s): 64-A-23, 64-A-20, 64-A-19 b. Total acreage to be rezoned: 47.5415 Acres C. Total acreage of the parcel(s) to be rezoned (if the entirety of the parcel(s) is not being rezoned): Entirety to be rezoned d. Current zoning designation(s) and acreage(s) in each designation: RA - 13.8596 Acres RP - 33.6819 Acres e Proposed zoning dcsignat1oil (s) and acrcagc(s) in cacti designation: RP - 47.5415 Acres Magisterial District(s): Shawnee 12 • 0 • 5. Checklist: Check the following Items that have been included with this application. Location 111a1) ✓ Agency Comments ✓ Plat ✓ ._ Fees _ ✓ Deed to property _ ✓ Impact Analysis Statcmcnt _ ✓ '_ Verification of taxes paid ✓ ;_ Proffer Statcmcnt ✓'_ Plat depicting exact meets and bounds for the proposed zoning district ✓ Digital copies (pd s) of all submitted CIOCUrnents, slaps and exhibits _ ✓ 6. The Code of Virginia allows tis to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Shen -Valley Land Holdings LLC c/o First Bank • 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NUMBER USE ZONING North Future residential RP/RA South Cemetery RA East SF residential RP/RA West Agriculture RA 'See attached list for complete adjoiner info 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based On nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers): The Property is located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). 0 13 U 9. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Single Family homes: 100 Non -Residential Lots: Office: Retail: Restaurant: Commercial: 10. Signature: Number of Units Proposed Townhome: 100 Multi -Family: 100 Mobile Home: Hotel Rooms: Sauare Footavc of Proposed Uses Service Station: Manufacturing: Warehouse: Other: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board Of Superv►sol's to amend the Zoning Ordinance and to change the zoning ►na1) of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this Ipl)llC Iti011 1S Submitted must be placed at • the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s): Date: Date: Owner(s): Date: Date: 0 14 11 0 • Adjoining Property Owners Freedom Manor • 41 Name Address Property Identification Number PIN Name: Shenandoah Memorial Park Inc. 311 Veterans Hwy, Suite B Property #: 64-3-A Levittown, PA 19056 Name: Paul M. Haldeman Jr. Trust c/o First Bank Trust Division 1835 Valley Ave Property #: 64-A-24 Winchester, VA 22601 Name: Thomas Breedlove and Mabel Breedlove 3575 Papermill Rd Property #: 63-A-146 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Eugene F. Grove 320 Victory Rd Property #: 63-A-145 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: EFG Investments LLC 340 W Parkins Mill Rd Property #: 63-A-124 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Madison II LLC 558 Benny Beach Rd Property #: 64-A-18 Front Royal, VA 22630 Name: Property Management and Development LLC 1020 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-3, 64D-A-4, 64D-A-5 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Darlene Good Gary et als 1048 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-7, 64D-A-8 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Franklin L. Myers, Sr. 1071 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-12, 64D-A-14 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Asako Whitacre 101 Harris Ln Property#: 64D-A-10 Yorktown, VA 23692 Name: Alan V. Burke, Jr. & Annalie Burke 8996 Old Montgomery Rd Property#: 64D-2-A-11, 64D-2-A-12, 64D-2-A-15 Columbia, MD 21045 Name: Eric W. Pratt and Allison Pratt 125 Westwood Circle Property#: 64D-2-A-9, 64D-2-A-10 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Jerry A. Sales & Theresa L. Sales 117 Westwood Circle Property #: 64D-2-A-7, 64D-2-A-8, 64-A-21A Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Wade R. Manuel & Carol L. Manuel 207 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-1-B-A Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Johnny H. Anderson 197 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-A-6 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Paul D. Brooks and Willene C. Brooks 187 Westwood Dr Property#: 64D-2-A-5 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Barbara L. Midkiff 179 Westwood Dr Property#: 64D-2-A-4 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Raymond H. Mayhew & Jean E. Mayhew 366 Singhass Rd Property #: 64D-2-A-3 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Brenda S. Dodd, Trustee 155 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-2 Winchester, VA 22602 Name Address Property Identification Number PIN Name: Robert M. Largent & Patsy O. Largent 141 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-A-1 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Roxanne L. Madigan 131 Westwood Dr Property#: 64D-A-28 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Joseph W. Edminston 1295 Hollow Rd Property #: 64D-A-27 Gore, VA 22637 Name: Red Fox Run Homeowners Association Inc. c/o Debra Potter 106 Travis Ct Property#: 64D-8-1-1A Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Jose D. Hernandez & Estanislao Hernandez 102 Orion Ct Property #: 64-2-D2 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Ann S. Cross, Trustee 1170 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-30 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Robin Casey Wilisch 21 Peyton St Property #: 64-A-23A Winchester, VA 22601 Name: Property #: Name: Property#: • Name: Property #: Name: Property#: Name: Property#: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property#: Name: Property #: 0 0 Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Website: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (540) 665-5651 Facsimile (540) 665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Shen -Valley Land Holdings LLC (Phone) 540-667-8300 (Address) 1835 Valley Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 110009410 on Page and is described as 110009282 Tax Map 64-A 23, 20, 19 do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Pennoni Associates hic. (Phone) 540-667-2139 (Address) 117 I . Piccadilly Street Suite 200, Winchester VA 22601 To act as my true and lawful attorney -in -fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: _Rezoning (including proffers) _Conditional Use Pe►'mit _Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) �✓�_Subdivision _Site Plan _Variance or Appeal tVly attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization sht In witness thereof, I ( Signaturc(s) ar from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwisaceinded or modified. set my (our) hand and seal this J6 day of, 20 , State of Virginia, City/Coup of _ _�i°'l'o-wit: � ;\ /. I, ►'��O �cYa�GtYl'tr►� a Notary Public in and for the jurisdictioJ:1 aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument personal] appeared before- inr,'.and-has acknowled led the same b fore me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this day of_eae; 20 I ` My Commission Expires: _ IO' 51 jG _ C �- No '2 1l l y i LINE BEARING DISTANCE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 N 73'06'23" E 951.73' L17 S 04'50'58" W 150.34' L2 S 05'00' 15" E 320.95' L18 N 85'05'37" W 238.63' L3 S 04'57'46" E 205.91' L19 N 84'57'24" W 260.22' L4 S 04'48'00" E 217.85' L20 N 54'27'40" W 206.55' L5 S 82'57'58" W 45.00' L21 N 87'53'48" E 84.00' L6 N 27'35'40" E 13.70' L22 N 07*42'13" W 933.75' L7 N 80'13'20" W 158.80' L23 S 85'05'37" E 1138.98' L8 S 13'20'39" W 61.02' L24 S 05'39'03" E 16.96' L9 S 82'57'58" W 116.02' L25 N 85'05'37" W 298.53' L10 S 07'25'02" E 226.40' L26 S 03'46'37" E 236.38' L11 S 82'34'46" W 120.00' L27 S 02'35'01" E 460.08' L12 S 07'25'04" E 129.51' L28 N 87'10'38" W 375.98' L13 S 85'09'02" E 122.80' L29 S 84'22'02" W 1003.32' L14 S 85'09'02" E 138.10' L30 N 31'07'41" W 52.03' L15 S 28'17'58" W 61.00, L31 N 28'23'08" W 599.99' L16 N 85'09'02" W 90.00, L32 N 61'24'57" E 652.57' F, portion of TM #64-A-20 W 13,8596 Ac. Zoned RA r -P L7 00 N i �0 _ L9 L5 portion of TM #64-A-20L11 0 4.6065 Ac. Zoned RP L21 N L13 L14 10 TM #64-A-19 2.2021 Ac. �o L19 L18 J L16 Zoned RP L23 TM #64-A-23 26.8733 Ac. Zoned RP L28 <� L29 FREEDOM MANOR — REZONING BOUNDARY Date: 1 1—3-2014 Scale: 1 "=400' PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 667-2139 FREEDOM MANOR - IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT Revised November 2015 The following is a summary of the proposed rezoning of Freedom Manor (the "Property") to the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District to provide for up 300 dwelling units on 47.5 acres located east and adjacent to Papermill Road, approximately 1/2 mile north/west of the intersection of Papermill Road and Route 522. Proposed Development The proposed development plan is depicted on the attached Exhibit A. As shown, the project would consist of two phases that would provide for a maximum of 300 total dwelling units served by a north/south connector road extending from a proposed roundabout at the project entrance on Papermill Road through the site and to the northern project limits where it would connect with the transportation network approved for the adjoining Madison Village project. Phase 1, located on the southern portions of the Property, is approximately 33.68 acres in size and would consist of a maximum of 100 single family dwelling units. Phase 2 would be comprised of the remaining 13.66 acres at the northern limits of the Property and consist of a maximum of 200 dwelling units which could be single family attached, apartments, or a combination thereof. The proposed Proffer Statement also provides an option to utilize Frederick County's Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program in order to construct any of the proposed dwelling units. The TDR option could be utilized in lieu of the proposed monetary proffers, as the TDR option mitigates impacts by transferring development rights from elsewhere in the County, but all other proffers including those relating to site use and layout would remain unchanged under the TDR option, thus ensuring a cohesive project. A location map is attached as Exhibit B. As shown, the project is located between Papermill Road and Route 522 near the existing signalized intersection of the two roadways. Adjoining land to the south, zoned RA, is the current Shenandoah Memorial Park. Lands adjoining the site to the east are generally single family detached uses zoned RA and RP. To the north of the site is the recently approved Madison Village project, zoned RP and slated for up to 640 dwelling units as a mixture of apartments and townhomes. Additional RA zoned lands are located west and adjacent to the Property and are planned for high density residential and public park uses by the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan (the "Comprehensive Plan"). Site Location The project is comprised of three tax map parcels identified as 64-A-19, 20, and 23 and is a mixture of RP and RA zoning currently. The attached Exhibit C provides a summary of the existing zoning for the project. As shown, the southernmost 26.87 acres is zoned RP and represents an area that was rezoned to the RP district in 2005 to provide for up to 70 single family dwelling units. The 2005 rezoning application proposed access at both Papermill Road as well as to Route 522 through an adjoining property. This new rezoning application would remove the direct access to Route 522, which would be preferred from an access management perspective, and also expand the area of the project to the north to include an adjoining 20.63 acres. As shown on Exhibit C, this Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 1 1 L: J.. _ 0=1*r' , Madison Village Road and 10' Trail Connection to Madison Village -Tr Rba2�_�r4 1-0' a-i- rail V C p,tfiin to TM 8 A-145 � J P8IS8 1 �1 — i i Proposed' 'hail 10' ' St and North/South \ 10' an i' Connector Road \� Proposed p '� �� Proposed Roundabout Proposed SO' hail Evergreen \ / Screen +0 Proposed �A R/1r Dedication 2, N � SUBJECT PROPERTY Shenandoah Memorial Park Existing Signal II FREEDOM MANOR PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. Generalized Development P/on 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Yrginia 22601 p rn VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 QL fR£D£R/CK COUNTY, ORGIN14 C..h:h:♦ A Dow We t: 74 • �:'`\_ A I _• r. S�f• • wt A • n .5 � '�� / :i /a t • w eete r �� . • a Airport Roach i Re al Airpo IVO Project - , Site '"�`kT-� . .. <a-+ . _ ~ � Evendaig- r 1v Elementary_ School s' _ r r i • A iral 'B d MI dle �c o1 ` LEGEND Site aProject (47.54 Ac) Ex. Freedom Manor Zoned RP (26.87 Ac) Ex. RP Zone (6.81 Ac) Ex. RA Zoning (13.86 Ac) Cb W o a A Planned �1 L Roadways � 4 r I � I / I Madison Village Connection at ` Madison Village iterparcel , Connection L ---- , a 0' Proposed Entrance 12. 600 J00 0 600" ( /N FEET ) 1 inch = 600 ft. FREEDOM MANOR Exhibit C — Existing Zoning FREDER/CK COUNTY, WGINA Proposed Shenandoah Aemorial Park Existing Signal PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E. Picadill St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 adjoining acreage is a mixture of 6.81 acres of existing RP zoning (without proffers currently) and 13.86 acres of RA zoning. Site Characteristics Attached Exhibit D depicts the existing site conditions. The Property is currently vacant aside from some fencing and small outbuildings. Two ponds are located on the subject Property. Any wetland areas located on the property are limited to areas associated with the two existing ponds. There are no mapped floodplains on the Property. As depicted on Exhibit D, The site has a high elevation of 745 feet and a low elevation of approximately 720 feet with existing slopes generally in the 2-5 percent range. The majority of the site drains from west to east. Soils on the site are identified as Blairton silt loams, Clearbrook channery silt loams, and Weikert-Berks channery silt loams. The characteristics of this soil type and any implications for site development are manageable through the site engineering process. Comprehensive Plan The Property is located wholly within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). Further, the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan (the "Land Use Plan") identifies the southern portions of the site for "Residential" land uses intended for 4 units per acre. The Land Use Plan identifies the intended use of the northern portions of the Property for "High Density Residential" uses at a density of 12-16 units per acre. The proposed development plan for the Property recognizes the planned land uses included in the Comprehensive Plan. Phase 1 of the project is proposed at a density of approximately 3.0 units per acre, consistent with the "Residential" planned land use identified by the Comprehensive Plan. Phase 2 is proposed at a density of up to 14.4 units per acre, which is consistent with the "High Density Residential" land use as specified by the Comprehensive Plan. Access and Transportation Access to the Property would be provided by a single access point on Papermill Road utilizing an off -set roundabout design. The initial traffic study for the project assumed a typical entrance on Papermill Road. However, the relatively narrow existing right of way for Papermill Road precluded the construction of a southbound left turn lane to accommodate traffic heading south on Papermill Road and turning into the site. The Applicant approached the adjoining property owner across Papermill Road to seek additional right of way necessary to construct the turn lane or a typical four way roundabout, which would also accommodate the turn movements. The adjoining property owner respectfully declined offers by the Applicant to purchase right of way for either of those improvements. In order to safely accommodate turning movements at the project entrance, the Applicant has revised the TIA and prepared an associated Roundabout Justification Study, attached as Appendix A and Appendix 8, respectively. These two studies are referred to collectively as the "TIA." Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 2 .fir '� r ! • w►� ., . �T- a ` .t Existing` Pon J or- •� � F �� �� ! �� Yam• -'• ANA if qw ''�" ► ;, °2�iW'"+� Vic+{' :�^ ��'• ti .>'1...- - Ifs. Existing Pond cow •� l f r r S nandoa s° r morial Park A north/south connector road, as shown on the proffered Generalized Development Plan (GDP), would extend from the proposed entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits where it would connect with the planned transportation system for the adjoining Madison Village project. For reference, the GDP includes the transportation program approved as part of the Madison Village rezoning and master development plan. While not included as part of the County's long range transportation plans, this north/south connection between Freedom Manor and Madison Village would improve connectivity in the area and also help to minimize new access points along Route 522. The TIA identifies the impacts associated with and levels of service (LOS) that can be expected after development of the subject Property. The phased analysis assumes background traffic growth and development of adjoining projects as well to provide for an accurate depiction of the future functionality of the transportation network. At full build - out, the proposed rezoning is expected to generate 2,643 average daily trips. The TIA assumes two phases. Phase 1 includes detached units on a single access point at Papermill 200 single family attached or apartment units and Madison Village project. Accordingly, the Phase through the Madison Village site that would utilize access to Papermill Road. development of 100 single family Phase 2 adds the development of assumes a connection through the 2 scenario includes vehicle trips he north/south connector road for The TIA identifies that the roundabout on Papermill Road will function at an overall LOS B or better under both the 2020 Phase 1 and 2026 Phase 2 scenarios. This improvement is proffered to be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any dwelling units for the project thereby ensuring safe and efficient traffic movements for Papermill Road traffic and vehicles accessing the site. The TIA recommends lengthening the eastbound Papermill Road right turn pocket at Route 522 and also to revise the signalization at that intersection to provide for a right turn overlap phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase into the signal timing. This would allow for a continuous right turn movement as opposed to a right -on -red situation for vehicles turning from Papermill Road onto southbound Route 522. That suggested improvement would be required as a condition of background traffic, regardless of the development of Freedom Manor. The TIA identifies acceptable levels of service at full build -out for the intersections within Madison Village and at Route 522 and Justes Drive without the need for any additional improvements. The proposed proffer statement limits access to Papermill Road to a single entrance as shown on the GDP. The Applicant has proffered the following improvements prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 1501h dwelling unit: Extension of the north/south connector road from the roundabout on Papermill Road to the northern property limits (to connect with Madison Village) Construction of an interparcel connection to the western Property limits (as shown on the GDP). Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 3 In addition, the Applicant has proffered to provide for additional right of way across the Property frontage on Papermill Road to accommodate its share of the ultimate 80 foot right of way for Papermill Road, planned as a major collector. To provide for a multi - modal transportation system, the proposed proffer statement includes the extension of a 10' hiker/biker trail through the site. Resulting from the 2005 rezoning application existing restrictive covenant would preclude north/south connector road. Historic Sites and Structures process for a portion of the Property, an the connection of Westwood Drive to the The Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks identified the Evendale School (file #34-433) within the vicinity of the site. However, that structure has been converted to a private residence. Review of the application by the Historic Resources Advisory Board has been deemed unnecessary. Stormwater Management The site currently drains generally from west to east. Development of the Property will be subject to the revised Stormwater Management regulations addressing both stormwater quantity and quality. As opposed to a single large stormwater management facility, the final design of the stormwater management system will likely include the use of several bioremediation filters to provide quality and quantity controls that meet current requirements. Ownership and maintenance of any open space areas, including stormwater facilities, will be the responsibility of the HOA per the proposed proffer statement. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply Using a standard rate of 200 gallons per day/dwelling unit it is projected that the proposed development could produce up to 60,000 gallons per day of sewer flow. An existing 8" sewer line within Westwood Drive, adjacent to the site, would serve as the connection point for sanitary service for the Property directing flows ultimately to the Opequon Wastewater Treatment Plant. A pump station may be required to service the easternmost portions of the site. Alternatively, it may be possible to provide gravity service to the entirety of the Property by extending service to the existing sewer main within Route 522 via an existing "pipe stem" that extends from the Property to Route 522. The final design of the sanitary system would be identified as part of the site engineering process. Water supply will be provided by way of an existing 8 water main extending from Westwood Drive to the Property. Water usage of the project would be roughly equivalent to its sewer flows of up to 60,000 gallons per day. The water system will be designed to provide adequate pressure for potable water service and fire -fighting services. Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 4 0 Solid Waste The following table provides a projection of the potential solid waste generation as a part of this project. Unit Type Units Waste Generation Total Waste (Ibs) Single Family Detached 100 12 lbs/day 1,200 Single Family Attached 200 9 lbs/day 1,800 Total 3,000 The Regional Landfill will be utilized for solid waste disposal. Waste collection by private hauler will be the responsibility of the HOA for Freedom Manor in order to minimize impacts to citizen convenience sites. Impact on Community Facilities To mitigate any impacts to community facilities, the Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution consistent with the current Frederick County Impact model. The proffer statement provides the Applicant with the option to develop the Property utilizing the County's TDR Ordinance in lieu of monetary proffers. If the TDR option is not utilized, the proffer statement requires that the monetary contribution would be necessary for any dwelling units constructed on the Property. Approximately 6.81 acres of the proposed Phase 1 area is currently zoned RP with no associated proffers. Accordingly, this portion of the site could develop under the RP provisions of the zoning ordinance with no proffers for capital facilities or limitations on housing types. To ensure a cohesive development, this area has been included within the proffer statement and GDP thereby limiting development on the existing 6.81 acres of RP zoning to only single family detached uses and also ensuring that the proposed north/south collector road is extended through that portion of the site. The monetary proffers for the 100 single family detached dwellings proposed within the Phase 1 area of the development have been adjusted to reflect the 20 potential dwellings that would result within the existing 6.81 acres of un-proffered RP zoning based on the proposed single family density for the entirety of Phase 1 of approximately 3.0 dwelling units per acre. The resulting per unit monetary proffer for any single family detached dwellings constructed on the Property is $15,745. The calculation for this value is as follows: • Phase 1 is proposed with 100 units on 33.6819 Acres for an effective density of 2.969 units/acre. • 6.8086 acres of existing, un-proffered RP zoning could therefore yield 20.21 units (20 units). • Removing 20 units from the 100 unit maximum for single family dwellings within Phase 1 results in 80 units. • Capital impacts for 80 dwelling units at the current County Impact Model is 80 x $19,681 = $1,574,480 total impact to capital facilities resulting from the rezoning application. • $1,574,480 then divided by 100 total units rounds up to $15,745 per single family dwelling unit. Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 5 0 0 The specific monetary proffers proposed for the single family detached units proposed within Phase 1 of the project and the single family attached or apartment units proposed within Phase 2 of the project is as follows: Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library $354 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,745 $13,680 $13,880 Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FREEDOM MANOR FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Located In Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Dave Holliday Construction 420 W Jubal Carly Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 667-2120 U l ' UnoucL7�s 1;. KENNEDY Prepared by: Lic. No. 21450 r1-1�'. 9-1-15 Pen noni��> Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects 13880 Dulles Corner Ln, Ste 100 1�: ?�1AL.��' Pennons Herndon, Virginia 20171�j7� T 703.449.6700 - F 703.449.6713 October 28, 2014 Revised August 12, 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pennoni Associates Inc. has prepared this report to present the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed development of' "Freedom Manor" in Frederick County, VA. As shown in Figure 1, the Subject 47.5 acre site is located Southeast of' Winchester, VA, between 1-81, Papermill Road (Route 644), and Route 522 (Front Royal Pike). The analysis was based on the requirements of' Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). A scoping agreement is included in Appendix A. Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) submitted a traffic memo for the Subject parcel Oil July 22, 2004 in support of a rezoning, and was approved for 70 single-family detached residential units in the site's southern 26.9 acres parcel and two site access locations, via Papermill Road and a secondary access to Route 522. The zoning was approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in September 2005 for an RP (Residential Performance Zoning). The proffers included a regional road contribution as well as language not to include a connection to Westwood Drive (VA Route 822). As shown in Figure 2, this project proposes an expansion of the rezoning area to utilize the site's northern parcels for all overall site density of 100 single-larnily detached residential Units and a mix of 200 townhonles and apartments. Two site access points are proposed, one on Papermill Road and the other to Route 522 via an interparcel connection to the approved Madison Village development to the north. The general development plan also allows for a third interparcel access to accommodate VDOT guidance for one access for every 100 DU (dwelling units) with an access stub to the west. As discussed with VDOT, a scaled generalized development plan is shown in Figure 2A in lieu of a concept plan since the site is only in the rezoning phase. The project is planned to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the 100 single-family detached residential Units with access to Papermill Road and Phase 2 would consist of 200 townhornes and apartments. Accordingly, two analysis years, 2020 for Phase I and 2026 for Phase 2 were analyzed in this report. The interparcel connection with Madison Village was assumed for 2026 only. At build -out (2026), the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,643 daily trips and 206 and 249 trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The proposed development -generated average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed the 5,000 vehicle threshold for a "Chapter 527" SUbillission. However, Pcnnoni prepared this report in accordance with "Chapter 527" gUidelincs contained in Y I5.2-2222. I of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24 VAC 30-155), for submittal to Frederick County, VA, and VDOT Staunton District planning staff. Based on VDOT comments, the report is revised front the original analysis in October 2014 to include a roundabout at the Papermill Road site access. A separate roundabout justification is provided to supplement this report. DHOL1404 Page 1 Pennoni • 0 T � 3 = a' �a Approximate Site Boundary 0 �f, J I � I � T I G SITE E r..J tL t �I I 16,430 SITE \l - © erm�ll �� 4 (Route 18,680 1 S Justes Drive y _ 2,450 - ' - v 17 770 � a N _ N N 0 x LEGEND N 1 � Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS >, 1 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS c 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1 000 WEEKDAY ADT O L Y N N 1f T �1 Papermill Road � � - (Route Cx141 t 62(1211� N 7 -r O f` 00 O� j T � .� 118 (70) 50 (41) FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 7 - • rRAHlcIMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES OHOL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA tugusr2015 M I N Approximate Site `V Boundary 0 I T I � SITE J w r- I i ' '�'frL I LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS 4FLANE GEOMETRY CTRAFFIC SIGNAL A AM PEAK LOS PEAK LOS) (A) (PM Pap�rll Road (Route B 751^ U a N RC*1 m p v vJ�/L JVL o z Papermill Road w SUS 5U� (Route 644) A C (D)* (B) OVERALL LOS = B (C) ' Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). Justes Drive O A (A) dd� ee� �B(B) t�=B(B) Drive /)J�Justes �� p ro U Th v d d Q �°a dQd OVERALL A (A) LOS =A(A) FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 8 ' TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS """'' FREDERICK COt1NTY, VA Augur 2015 17,970 Y_ M C N � C try � T .. .y. cl Approximate Site Boundary o a ^J SITE J r-- I 17,970 SITE \I - Paperntill Road (Route 644) 68(1 v l29 (77) 1 � i5 (J5) Justes Drive Y t c �i is vi ppp �O a c a_ [i FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND GROWTH FIGURE 9 rRAFFIc IMNAc•r sruD' TRAFFIC VOLUMES D1"'-`"'' FREDERK:K COUNTY, VA luyrrsr 2015 5(8)� 4,970 a ro , N �e 3 Ov\fie Y , ilk .,o c 3 770 Madison Village LZ * Madison Entrance Village 349 (189).$ t �( 260 (131).� 286 (155) Approximate Site Boundary = N a y� negative volume due to pass -by trips (see T Appendix Figure D3) ( I c i SITE E I SITE j 4,000 `\ 0 zrmill Pa R6441 Road 4 l oute 1 780 x j 2,860 t Justes Drive High School 5 x � 2,080 2,860 05 a� 2 M N 0 O. LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS o I t e TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1 000 WEEKDAY ADT N � O N v � T �1 r N o � N o Papermill Road (Route 644) t 63(91)� 55 (12) � ^ T x � 86 (43) t � � 86 (43) .IU5le5 DRee t Y � K ri FREEDOM MANOR 2020BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 10 � TRAI-'FIC IMPACT S'ft,UY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS naociaoa FIiEDERICK COUNTY, VA Augers?n!i 22 940 3 c ^ltad'S°° �a°c` 21 740 F, Approximate Site Boundary CK I i1 i i c4 1 SITE ° II � Y T N 21,970ad = �° SITE N [ _ \ Papermill Road _ I (Route 644) t 13](223).o 197(418)� M papermi„ v .5 ac lROute 6141 4 N O Road x 11,410 �r i23,290 Justes Drive 5 1 4,760 22,290 G <Y T -' C7 C (+1 rl N J O a LEGEND o Q1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS v M 1( �1 x �I70(142) ♦�63 (246) �170(,42) 4 430 Entrance Madison village It f $,460 5 (8) 26n(,31�..► 5(8)� -- C M un M Y_ 1 L- Madisc», village Entrance 349 (189) 286 (l55) MU N �o Y_ 1 L- Madisc», village Entrance 349 (189) 286 (l55) MU N �o v FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND FIGURE 11 • � TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES U,IOtr404 FREDERICt( COUNTY. VA Ii�iur 2015 • I + -0 i<� (A) Entrance Madison Village IFn A (A) OVERALL LOS = A (A) E 0 N \ Approximate Site Boundary o O I T I SIT[ J v. LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N SITE I Pape1, ,...644 (toad lRo O B (A) Y N m m o Madison Village Entrance n C (D) ^ U C (D) Q d d A (A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) B (D) �+ N A m m rq O N Papermill Road w (Route 644) 0 D (E)* A w_ as U d B (C) OVERALL LOS=C(D) « Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' +65'taper). Justes Drive O \�) d d C (D) A C (D) t�= Justes Dnve a ell T vi _ d d tY � o ££ OVERALL w a B(A) LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND FIGURE 12 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 9 110 L""' FREOEI= COUNTY. VA Augmw 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 6: SITE TRIP GENERATION 71'E Lwtd Un (1) 1 AM PEAK HOUR PA1 PEAK HOUR )All i Cy)DE CODE_ REAWT_L' 6,ur. Im a � TlJTA /Lv Trip Generation By Right 210 210.190 70 DU Single -Fare Del (VD01) 13 40 53 44 26 70 -( Trip Generation options and land use variables PHASE 1 (2020) 210 21(1170 100 DU a SF Res. Cry 100 DU (using EQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 1,050 210 210100 100 DU Single-Fam. Det (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD-0UT (2026) 230 231(m 200 DU Townhouse (usingAVERAGE RATE) 15 73 88 70 34 104 1,172 230 230,180 40 DU a TH Res @40 DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 2-IIAO0 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VOOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 83 47 130 1,303 Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily F.JjectiveTripRates (2,3) (2—ay) %Inbound 12-war1 %Irbaund Weekdav 210 *single-Fam Dd.(VDOT) DU 076 25% 1.00 63% loif0 210 SF Res d. 107 DU DU 0.81], 29're 091 63% 1050 AVE 210 single -Fort. Det. DU 0,75 25% I.00 63% 9.k AW- 230 Townhouse DU 0,44 (79A. 1152 67% 5.86 230 TH Res a 40 DU DU 0.63 16% (170 68% 7 2S Townhouse (VDOT tiraurnun f .,mi t Rate DU 061 23% 091 64% K14 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012. Average trip rates used, unless noted with "e', then equations used at size shown, with data set OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SO > 11 D% of aye. (1) RE Land Code shown as the irsl 3 digits. Decimal shown l r internal use by Pennon for lookup table for trip rate %enable. (2) Effective trip rates calculated by land use. For average rites = (Density) x (aye trip rate) = 2-way Trips x (inbound percentage) for Trips In For RE equations, "e" noted = (Density) x I trip equation) = 2-way Trips x (inbound pe—ge) for Trips In (3) Assumed 80% of townhouses at Staunton District effective Rates for townhouse. condo, or apartment. DHOL1404 Page 36 Pennoni 45% ilk on �e , N ^ 3 o c x x 20% SITE J o � I I SITE Pa ermill�4) Road l 4 Ilk jr tf c-1 c 0 d Y LEGEND C. o x G ( STUDY INTERSECTIONS 0 wit TURNING MOVEMENTS ® 3 5 % 10%(10%) Inbound %(Outbound %) N 0 Entrance Madison Village O a0 � a o Y � N cd vj T Madison Village � 1 O a Entrance h h n 2=a Papermill Road (Route fi4=1) 0 Justes Drice t Y C. N v .. c FREEDOM MANOR 2020 SITE (PHASE 1) FIGURE 13 TRAFFIC IMPACT sruw TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS D1OLooa FREDERICK COUNTY, VA AuK'al'01' • 0 %w 0 ilk Enirancc Madison Village 0 F= 1 210 1 Y % 12 (7) 48(27) Site Entrance t� v - e J c, z -- A 0. II 480 1 \ Approximate Site Boundary 0 oG J 'L X SITE J c ° I I I /1 Y80 SITE 1 840 1 LEGEND 01 STUDY INTERSECTIONS it f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,0110 WEEKDAYADT N Papermill Road lR0 10 1 370 1 u- �- N � 7 d 1 0� Madison Village It Entrance y CL N _ C'4 � � v Papermill Road j ` , ( Route 644) 1t 27(15).0 z1(u) Pa Juste= C 0 n1 Justes Drive t 0. ry N T� = � c � t= FREEDOM MANOR 2020 SITE (PHASE 1) FIGURE 14 • rRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS DIJOL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY. VA Iugz1.c1'Il15 O K ;W " r %170 (142) ., 1 M 63 (246) 1 jr 170 (142) 474307 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5()00 260 (131) MM101- �tr 5 (8) r, .. W v a_ r•, 0 11,620 x - 12 (7) 1� 'r48(27) Site Entrance tr _Z 22,220 \ Approximate Site Boundary 0 a 1 e i SITE w I I SITE 22,450 \te , papermill (toad (Route 12,250 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS I1a TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAY ADT N 122.66011 0 Y_ T O� i0 N 7 N � o Madison Village L' Entrance 349 (189) .0 t 286 (155) Nrn �o Papennill Road ( Route 644) t 158 (238) M0 218 (430)� 0 a, w Ic Ai 215 (120) 1 � � 141 (88) Justes Drive tr o C" N o Qr eq O N .. ri FREEDOM MANOR 2020 TOTAL FIGURE 15 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIIOL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Augusl2015 0 0 0 2 ��a i J Entrance t�aa�soot�,�c C. Madison Village *Tt Approximate Site Boundary 0 OVERALL LOS = A (A) y I o I i SITE I I SITE O A (B) m •� A (A) Q 6 Site Entrance o a� a� OVERALL c- �(A) LOS — A (B) LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS �QU LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN R TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N rav-"-te 644) Road (Ro' I. 0 B (A) Y 4 N rv/ o Madison Village U. Entrance a C (D) U C (D) C:�j d e d d A(A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) x 4 A ri U o � Papermill Road u, (Route 644) D (F)* U E B(D) OVERALL LOS = C (D) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). Justes Drive 0 B (A) Q Q C (D) p Justes Drive OVERALL B (A) t LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2020 TOTAL FIGURE 16 TR,FPIC IMPACT STLDN TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DIJOL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY. VA lugasr1015 i E 0 0 Entrance Madison Village 0 t� 0 m 19,650 19,650 �r Approximate Site Boundary 0 Y � x � c i SITE J r' / L — SITE 19,650 LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC. AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAY ADT N y a Route 6441 Road 122,34011 o v V' � N :V T 7 Madison Village Entrance a ® y �r Papermill Road (Route 641) 74(145).* 155 (445)� 7 o r a �n x N VI 2,930 O O � v ra. � 141 (84) 60 (49) lustes Dricc t 1 G N � v � 0 x r= FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND GROWTH FIGURE 17 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDI TRAFFIC VOLUMES °I10 11404 FREDERICK COUNTY. VA-h�kmsr?015 4,970 V6170(142) Entrance Papermill Road (Route 644) 63(91)� 55(12) 86 (43) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 18 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS t�nur. 1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 1r�,�nr _'8ti 24,620 ilk Ar e ; �\b O J�G� �aa �o<<a 23,420 Approximate Site Boundary 3 O t✓ ce SITE J I / — 23,650 ce SII-F \� - I t MP OI �mSill PapRoute (,44) 4 {toad _ 12 l0 ,- 25,200 5,010 0C 24,100 G �- N N N N O n: LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS TURNING MOVEMENTS 1 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,01)0 WEEKDAY ADT GD o M O � r �17U(142) �� 63 (246) 170 (142) Entrance Village $,46� r (131) �� M r Mi o y q — N � V': G � 3 Madison Village c:. Entrance 349 (1891 t 286 (155)� � T r x x O 1 4 N x � � O � 7 N [� Papennill Road ° v (Route Ei44) 13? (235) 210 (456) �C �O N N r N � 227 (127) 1 � � 146 (92) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 19 • rRAEFIc lMpAcrsTUw TRAFFIC VOLUMES FREDERICK COUNTY, VA ' - a • 0 v Entrance Madison Village 2 i OVERALL LOS = A (A) 0 N Approximate Site Boundary 0 Y I � C SITE J ° c:. i I �— — — — SITE I Road LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N is to O Madison Village L ^ ^ Entrance q C (D) U C (D) t d d d A (A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) QrU (E) 6. ( N m h o 2 Papermill Road w (Route 644) G D (F)* t". m U d B (D) OVERALL LOS = C (E) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). Justes Drive O F (A) d_ d �Im m C (D) pl;::3C(D)a ui]stes Drive LI^I, IAI 0. N lJ LJ LJ a o OVERALL ties fB (A) LOS = B (A) t' FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 20 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DIJOLIJOJ FREDERICI( COUNTY. VA August20I5 o O � %145 n (121) 40M 51 (197) ilk jr 145 (121) 3,5401 Entrance Madison Village 7,010 39(29)M14, Ite 208(105)0=110- 39 (29) N O a N `v �. % 81 (43) 1 � 27 (14) Site Entrance N N_ E 7 O d � C. Madison Village N Approximate Site Boundary G rx v Y C. T I � a SITE w LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS wit e TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1 000 WEEKDAY ADT N SITF ,460 Papent1111 Road (Route 2 550 o v Y p� N G N 00 Madison Village Entrance 349 (189) t 178 (98) e ^ _ 4 � N negative volume due to pass -by trips (see Appendix Figure D3) 'L Y' 4 N 2 x T� d O Papermill Road (Route 644) 16(23).p 82 (26) M N Justes Drive High School L 86 (43) 1 � � 86 (43) Justes Drive tf 6. N y O M FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 21 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS DUOL1404 w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FFEN30M COUNTY. VA August 2015 �f M %145(121) ♦M51 (197) ilk s145(121) 3 540 Entrance Madison Village 7,010 208(105)=0110- 39 (29) _ o 0 fWAU[1l1 % " 81 (43) r Y 27 (14) Site Entrance a r, zv x� — v N Y • j T 21,970 Approximate Site Boundary 7 x SITE J ° �I \> �II 22,200 SITE �I Pa Route 6441 4 Road 11,5g0 LEGEND QQ STUDY INTERSECTIONS 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AM(PM) l,000 WEEKDAYADT N 25,200 y 1 C N b 070 T Madison Village I — Entrance 349 (189) NO 178 (98) az e z 7! 1 ,p per. N y a P Papermill Road (Route 644) 90(167).o 237(471)MU r; v v N r lush•-_ 5,010 to G 227 (127) l46 (92) Justes Drive t Y io vNi � x J � N t= FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 22 TILAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES DLI0L1404 w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA .11(gusi 2015 0 45% ilk Ar 1 �acc�ce no (30, t Approximate Site ^� Boundary 0 x A 1 T 20% 1 i SITE ` SITE I o�ta�cIt (�I dill Pa Route 644) 4 Road l (20%) Site Entrance tJustes Dne T V T - _ " O N N J 3 N LEGEND �. tf 1 C O C 1 — � O STUDY INTERSECTIONS Me TURNING MOVEMENTS * 35% �o c a 10%;'t0`-�) Inbound %(Outhound',�U, 0 �� 3� :o Entrance Madison Village (35%) �♦ N e p c c� w Madison Village Entrance ® y Y Papermill Road (Route G44) l30'70) � _ _= FREEDOM MANOR 2026 SITE (BUILD -OUT) FIGURE 23 - • Tlza>=FIc IMPACT sTUDv TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS D10L`404 FREDEPoCK COUNTY, VA 4erKusi?uti 0 F %M 4�16(561 930 Entrance Madison Village 930 56(32)E=10- O 1 530 1 O 32 (18) 1 � � 72 (41) Site Entrance tf a N N C P N C � 0. II 1.1901 1 530 1 Approximate Site Boundary SITE I J r-- - - - SITE t e ott�Cc 1,190 LEGEND 0 STUDY INTERSECTIONS ■t a TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1 000 WEEKDAY ADT N 1 530 1 1 930 0 1 930 II w N r 00, o �- Madison Village l i Entrance 48(27).0 1 t 8(5)� x rl � 1 ro N � O v Papermill Road (Route 644) 24(14).0 48 (27) v N � lust" Dni C J �n Justes Drive J x ■ CL r7 T a o 15 y L FREEDOM MANOR 2026 SITE (BUILD -OUT) FIGURE 24 • TRAFFIC IMPACTSTIJDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS UIIOLI404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Augu,12015 • O M r �145(121) _ ♦� 67 (252) ilk Ar 145 (121) 4,470 Entrance Madison Village 7,940 39 (29) No )tf 263 (136)0=00- x 39 (29) C ^' � M �1 a •� v, - K o 113 (61) 99 (55) Site Entrance � r CL a 25.810 22,500 Approximate Site ^� Boundary � 0 d v �I T I � r�- i i SITE 22,730 3,180 � Pap�mill Road (Route) t 12,770 26,130 25,03 LEGEND Q1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS ■t TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,U(lU WEEKDAY ADT N 1 SSrq L N M X 3 rq v O N a O Madison Village L Entrance . t 397 (216) 186(1021)� ;7,, ; — x ^� o O if. iz L N N O ?; Papermill Road (Route 644) ) t 114 (181).o 285 (498)� 227 (127) 1 � � 146 (92) Drive v tJustes ■ _ C - L FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 25 TRAFFICIMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIIOL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A%,uNl 2015 Z 3 L.nu-ance o<<� E Madison Village Approximate Site M Boundary a OVERALL LOS — A (A) ?� 4 / II CJG I i SITE C ° I � I / SITE © C.+ A (A) d Ad 1k Site Entrance OVERALL a A B) LOS__AIBI LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N Road W. Q dv' vNi Madison Village ti Entrance C (D) U C (D) Q v d d A(A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) C (E) w 6. N � h U �v Papermill Road � ^ (Route 644) E (F)"` v m a d B(D) OVERALL LOS = C (E) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). When analyzed as two lanes, overall PM EB approach LOS "D". See Table 10 for details. Justes Drive O B (A) d d L�=C(D)� Justes Drive 4 ry N y. c m d OVERALL Q B (A) LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 26 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS D1101.1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Augsar2013 0 0 REZONING APPLICATION #11-15 FREEDOM MANOR Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: November 19, 2015 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Senior Planner Staff Contact: John A. Bishop, AICP, Deputy Director -Transportation PROPOSAL: To rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Perlormance) District with proffers. This application would enable the construction of up to 300 residential units. LOCATION: The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). EXECUTIVE SUMMARY S STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 12/02/15 PLANNING CONIIVIISSION MEETING: The Frecdom Manor Rezoning application seeks to rezone 33.68 acres fi-om the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.86 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District Nvitfi proffers. Of the 33 acres of existing RP zoned acreage, 26 acres of that was previously rezoned in 2005 under the same name of Freedom Manor. This application seeks to revise the proffers for the 26 acre portion tract (64-A-23) as well as include the acreage from parcels 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. This proposed development seeks to allow tine construction of up to 300 residential dwelling units (Phase I - single family detached, Phase II - townhouse and multi -family units). Tile development has an overall density of 6.3 units per acre). The Freedom Manor rezoning application is generally consistent with future land use designations of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan which provide guidance on the fixture development of the property. A fcw elements of the rezoning application Have been identified that should be carefully evaluated to ensure that they fully address the impacts associated with this rezoning request. The Planning Commission should pay particular attention to tine density and monetary contribution proposed with this development. Confirmation of the issues identified in the staff report, and any issues raised by the Planning Commission, should be addressed prior to a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Following the required public hearing, a recommendation regarding this rezoning application to the Board of'Supervrsors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the %planning, Commission. 0 9 Rezoning ftl 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19. 2015 Pa-e 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick County I'/a/urilrg Strrff to provide infivin(ttioll to the Planning Commission and the Board Of'Supervivory to assi.vt them in 11111!ing a decision on thi.v (lppllcation. It /!illy also he usefld to othery interested in thi.v zoning !flatter. Unresolved issiles CO/1Cc'/'lll/lg this llpf)llClJt1011 lll'C' lintel by stllf f whel'e /'eIL'VlJllt throughout thi.v ,Stll f f report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/02/15 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/13/16 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 fi-om the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residcntial Pei-formancc) District with proffers. This application would enable the construction of up to 300 residential units. LOCATION: The properties are located cast and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet nortll/west of tllc existing signalized interscetlon of front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Palm -mill Road (Route 644). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawncc PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 64-A-23, 64-A-20, and 64-A-19 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) District and RP (Residential Performance) District PRESENT USE: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RP (Residential Performance) RA (Rural Areas) South: RA (Rural Areas) Cast RP (Residential Performance) RA (Rural Areas) West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Vacant (Madison Village) Vacant/Agricultural Use: Shenandoah Memorial Park Use: Residential Residential USE: Residential/Vacant/Agl'iCLiltlli•al Rezoning It 1 1-15 Frecdom Manor November 19, 2015 Paae 3 REVIENN' EVALUATIONS: VirlZinia Dept. of Transportation: VDOT's District Planning Section has completed their review of the 2"" SUbnllssion of the Freedom Manor TIA. The TIA is in compliance Nvith VDOT's TIA regulations (24 VAC 30-155) and we haVC 110 OLItStalldillg 01' addlt1011al comments that need t0 be addressed. We would like to provide the following recommendation on the proffers dated Septenlbcr 4, 2015, submitted with the TIA: • Update the references to '`hiker/biker trail" in prollbrs 2.1 and 3.1 to "shared use path". • Update the minimum right -Of -way declication of' 56' from centerline in proffer 2.1 to 58' to accommodate the 10' wide shared use path, il'provided in the right-of-way. The provided 48' Width without the shared use path in the right-of-way is adequate. • Correct the spelling error of Papermill Road in proffer 2.2. Fire Marshal: Plans Approved. Public Works Department: We have completed our review of the site plan for the rezoning application for the proposed Frccclom Manor Subdivision and offer the following comments: Refer to the Impact Analysis Statement: Add a paragraph dedicated to the discussion of�stormwater. Refer to Page 4, Solid Waste: Expand the discussion to indicate that the residential clevelopment shall include the requirement fora private refuse hauler. Refer t0 the Proflcr Statement, Page 3 of4, Paragraph 6: Lxpand the discussion ol'tlle property owners' associate (POA) to include the requirements for maintaining open space and stormwater management facilities. In addition, the POA shall be responsible for a solid waste collection and disposal (i.e., curbside pickup, clumpster, etc.). FIederick County Sanitation Authority: Please see auache(l leffe1',1'011l Ulve B. I,Verlydel, PE, c%cllec% Janum y 20, 2015. Frederick-«'incliester Health Department: Hcalth Department has no objection to the Rezoning request at this time. Department of Parks & Recreation: • Monetary proffers applied only to 75 of the proposed 100 cletached units does not appear to meet impacts of the clevelopment. • The north/south hiker -biker trail recomnlencled to follow the west side of connector road rather than property boundary as shown. This is to match the approved trail in Madison Village. • Hiker -biker trail recommended along cast/west intcrparecl connector. Frederick County Public Schools: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Freedom Manor rezoning application submitted to us On January 16, 2015. We Offer the following comments: 0 0 Rezoning Ill 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19, 2015 Page 4 The cumulative impact of this development and other developments in Frederick County will require COi1St1'LICtIOn of new schools and support facilities to accommodate increased student enrollment. This development proposal includes a range of possibilities. The case that generated the most students is 100 (louses, 100 townhouses, and 100 apartments. We estimate that, in this case, the development will house 93 students: 25 High school students, 23 middle school students, and 45 clenncntary school students. In order to properly serve these additional students, Frederick County Public Schools would spend an estimate S 1,048,000 more per year in operation costs (or $3,493 average per unit per year) and an estimated $3,891,000 in one -tittle Capital expenditure (or $12,970 average per unit). YOU will find, enclosed with this letter, a more detailed assessment Of the estimatcd impact of Frecdom Manor on FCPS, including attendance zone information. Frederick County Attorney: Pleas•eseealtachetlletterfi•omRoderickB. lhilliams, CounlyAtlorney, date(/ March 2, 2015 Frederick County Inspection: Asbestos inspection/Abatmcnt required for all building removed that were constructed prior to 1985. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Upon review of' the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resOLu•ceS and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the FIRAB. FLIrihCl'i1101'e, the majority Of this property was previously rezoned in 2005. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no Significant historic structures located on the property nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study Of Civil War Sites in Shenandoah Valley does not identify a core battlefield within this area. Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History: The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) identifies this property as being zoned R-1 (Residential Limited). The parcels were re -mapped from R-I to A- 2 (Agricultural General) pursuant to the County's comprehensive downzoning initiative (Zoning Amendment Petition #01 1-80), which was adopted on October 8, 1980. The COunty's agricultural zoning districts were Subsequently combined to f orm the RA (Rural Areas) District Upon adoption Of all amendment to file Frederick COUIlty Z011lllg Ordinance Oil May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A -I and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. Parcel 64-A-19 and a portion Of parcel 64-A-20 were originally slated to be part of the Westwood Subdivision (Section B) and appear to retain their R-1/RP zoning designation. In 2002, Rezoning Application RZ#07-02, Doris F. Casey, was subillitted to the County for a request similar to the 2005 Frecdom Manor Rezoning. The rezoning proposal requested the development of seventy (70) single family detached residential lots on 30.31 acres with access being via ROLItc 522. At that time, the property had frontage on Route 522. Ultimately, the Board of Supervisors denied Rezoning Application 1/07-02 on December 17, 2002. Oil AUgLISt Rezoning Ill 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19, 2015 Page 5 20, 2003 a Minor Rural Subdivision (Family Division) was approval creating the 26.87 acre parcel for PIN 64-A-23. On September 14, 2005 the Boarcl of Supervisors approvel Rezoning #09-05 of Frccdom Manor which rezoned parcel 64-A-23 from the RA District to the RP District with proffers. This rezoning was approved for 70 single family dwellings on 26.87 acres of lancl. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan: The 2030 Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding clevelopmcnt, preservation, public facilities and other key components Of conlnlunily life. The primary goal of' this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. Land Use: The parcels comprising this rezoning application are locatecl within the County's Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The UDA defines the general area in which more intensive forms Of�resiclentlal developlllcllt will occur. Ill addition, the Freedom Manor clevelopmcnt is locatecl within the Senseny/Eastern Frecleriek Urban Area Plan of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. The Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan clesignates the area where this site is locatecl with a residential land use (4 units per acre clensity) and a high -density residential land use (12-16 units per acre). Phase I of the project consists of 33.68 acres an(I is limitccl to 100 single family cletachcd resiclential units, which would be three units per acre. Phase I1 of the project consists of 13.66 acres an(I is limitccl to a maX1111L1111 Of 200 single family attached Or multi -family units, which would be 14.6 units per acre. While the density shown with the Frceclom Manor rezoning is generally consistent with the comprehensive plan, there are no assurances that the area designated for high density resiclential will develop as indicated; there are no proffered 1111111111L1111 cleIlsltics. Staff Note: It'hile these densities and laird uses are generally consistent with the CoMprehensive plan, there are no assurances that the area des gnaterl fim high density resilleritial will del,elop as iiidicated as theee rri-e iio prof fel'ed lliiiiiiiiiiiiib'. The development of*Phase H with single family attached (townhouse) units and multifamily units does not assure densities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Transportation and Site Access: Initial access is gained to the site via a roundabout intersection with Papermill Road to be constructed by the applicant. FLItLII'c aciclitional access shall be gaineci tllrough interparcel connections to the Nvest and to the north at the Madison Village (levelopmcnt. The transportation network also includes a I W peclestrian trail along Papermill Roacl, and the Internal public roads shown on the GDP and a trail that runs the length of the common bOUndary with the Shenancloah Memorial Park. 3) Site Suitability/Environnient: 0 0 Rezoning Ill 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19, 2015 Page 6 The site is currently vacant and contains two existing ponds; there are 110 floodplallls Oil the property. The majority Of the site drains f om west t0 cast. Soils oil the site are identified as Blairton silt loams, Clcarbrook channery silt loams and Wcikert-Bcrks channery silt loams. Development Of the property will be subject to the revised Stormwater Management regulations addressing both storniwater quantity and duality. 4) Potential Impacts: A. Transportation Traffic Impact Analysis. According to the included traffic impact analysis, at full build OLlt the deVCiOI)lllellt is projected to generate 1200 average daily trips (ADT) with all studied nearby intersections expected to operate at ievel of service C or better witli the proffered improvements. Staff note: It should he noted that the TIA included wasfin- the pPBVlolls VBPb7oll of' this rezoning and the Current rezoning actually has the potential to generate 2,620 ADT. The additional traffic was not significant enough to trigger all updated TIA under Virginia Chapter 527 standards. Transportation Program. In addition to creating a roundabout intcrscction with Palm -mill Road, the Applicant is constructing a through road to Madison Village prior to the issuance of the 150°i building permit. This connection will Offer alternative access in and out Of the development via the Madison Village signal at ROLitc 522. The Applicant will also be providing interparcel connection to the west. B. Sewer and Water The Applicant's Impact Analysis Statement projects that the development could produce up to 60,000 gallons per day ofsewage flow. An existing 8" sewer line within Westwood Drive would serve as the connection point for sanitary service for the property which flows to the Opequon Wastewater Treatment facility. A pump station may be required to service the easternmost portions of the site. Water supply will be provided by way of an existing 81' water main extending from Westwood Drive to the property. C. Community Facilities The Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution to community facilities to offset the impact of the residential development. The amount per single family attached, and multi- family dwelling unit is consistent with the COLlllty's Development Impact Model values for 2015. It should be noted that the applicant has reduced the proffer payment for the single family attached units in recognition of the existing 6.81 acres Of unrestricted RP Zoned land. The full proffer amount would be $19,680 per single family detached unit. The 6.81 acres could yield 20 units at the anticipated density Of three units per acre (80 remaining units x $19,680 = $1,574,400 / 100 = $15,744). The Applicant has also proffered to allow Transferred Development Rights to pay for the monetary contribution Rezoning ltl 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19, 2015 Paoe 7 specified in the proffer for any of the 300 dwelling Units. Staff'Alote: The Applicant has reduced the proffer p(ginent for the single fmiily attached units in recognition of the existing 0.81 acres of'rnn-estricted RP zoired l(iii(l. The full prof fcr amount would be $19,680 per single family detached unit. The 6.81 acres COuld.y(eld 20 units at the anticipated densiih (# 3 unitsper acre (80 remaining units $19,680 = 51,574,400/100 = $15,744). 5) Proffer Statement — Dated Decer»ber 30, 2014; revised September 4, 2015, November 4, 2015, November 18, 2015: 1) Site Development: 1.1 The development is limited to 300 dwelling Units; Phasc 1 with Up to 100 single family detached and Please 2 with up to 200 dwelling Units (single family attached/detached Or nllilti-family). 1.2 The property Shall be developed in general coil form an cc \vlth the Gencralilcd Development Plan (GDP). 2) Transportation: 2.1 Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy, the Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way across the Papermill Road frontage in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right-of-way as measured from the centerline to provide for the future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail. 2.2 P1-iO1' t0 t11C 1SSUallce of a certificate Of OCCLlpancy for the first dwelllllg L1111t, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the property fi'Onl Papermill Road as shown on the GDP. No additional site entrances sllall be permitted on Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the Iollowing transportation improvements prior to the issuance of a building permit for the 150°i dwelling Unit: • Design and C011Stl'UCt t11C 1101'tll/SOUtll conncctor road fro111 the Paperillill Road entrance to the northcrn property limits to connect into Madison Village. • Design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western property limits in the general location depicted in the GDP. This connection can occur with Phase 1 or Phase 2. 3) Pedestrian/Biker Improvements: 3.1 Prior to the issuance of the 50°i building permit, the Applicant sllall Construct a 10' asphalt path across the Papermill Road frontage and across the southern property boundary. 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the rlortll/south connector road, the Applicant sllall construct a 10' asphalt path from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern property limits linking into the adjacent development. 0 • Rezoning 111 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19, 2015 Page 8 4) IVIonetary Contribution to Offset impact of Development: 4.1 For the single family detached dwelling units the Applicant shall pay $15,745 per unit. TheAapplicant shall pay $13,680 for each single family attached unit and $13,880 for each apartment unit. Staff Note: The Applicant has reduced the proffer p(gment for the single family attached units in recognition of the existing 0.81 acres of I1111'estricted RP7.oired Icrr)rt. The.fiill proffer ai11oU)it ivotlld be $19,680 per siugle.frrurily detached iiii t. The 6.81 acres Could y eld 20 units at the anticipated !lensi(j, of 3 un is per acre (80 remaining units $19,680 = S1,574,400/100 = $15,744). 5) Option for use of Transfer of' Development Ri�jbts Ordinance: 5.1 The Applicant may utilize Transferred Development Rights to pay for the monetary contribution specified in Proffer 4.1 for any of the 300 dwelling units. 6) Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association: 6.1 The property shall have a Property Owners Association (POA) which is responsible for Common areas, stormwater management facilities and solid waste collection and disposal. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund for the POA in the amount of $5,000. 7) Landscape Buffer: 7.1 Prior to the issuance of the 50°i dwelling unit, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens (minimum of'4 feet tall, spaced 10 feet on center) along the common boundary with the Shenandoah Memorial Park. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 12/02/15 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Freedom Manor Rezoning application seeks to rezone 33.68 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.86 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District witli proffers. Of the 33 acres of existing RP zoned acreage, 26 acres of that was previously rezoned in 2005 under the same name of Freedom Manor. This application seeks to revise the In -offers for the 26 acre portion tract (64-A-23) as well as include the acreage from parcels 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. This proposed development seeks to allow the construction of up to 300 residential dwelling units (Phase I - single family cetached, Phase 11 - townhouse and multi -family units). The development has an overall clensity of 6.3 units per acre). The Freedom Manor rezoning application is generally consistent with future land use designations of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan which provide guidance on the future development of the property. A few elements of the rezoning application have been identified that should be carefully evaluated to Cnsure that they fully address the impacts associated with this rezoning request. The Planning Commission should pay partiCular attention to the 0 • Rezoning # 1 1-15 Freedom Manor November 19, 2015 Page 9 cicnsity and monetary contribution proposed with this development. Confirmation Of the issues identified in the staff report, and any issues raised by the Planning COmm1SS1O11, Should be addressed prior tO a recommendation by the Planning Commission. Followin,;r the required public hearing,, a recommendation ref>arding this rezoning application to the Board of*Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequatelh address all concerns raised bh the Planning Commission. 0 a PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015; November 4, 2015; November 18, 2015 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised November 4, 2015. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. a Proffer Statement r-7 L—J Freedom Manor 2. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papermill Road in the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 1501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Said interparcel connection may be constructed within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 area of the Property. 3. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path to extend from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to link trail facilities planned for the adjoining development as depicted on the GDP. Page 2 or4 0 Proffer Statement 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development Freedom Manor 4.1 For any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library $354 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,745 $13,680 $13,880 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501" dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 3 of 0 L] Proffer Statement Respectfully submi�ldo�'gs ed, Shen -Val ley_Land Dennis A Dysa� Date: Novembe , 19, 20 Freedom Manor STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: -Ih The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I `I day of 2015, by �, ...� Q • Wj-" A -mot My commission expires Notary Public q "LfJ Page 4 of 4 j R 1�r Deborah F. Bly Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Public Commission No, 360532 My Ccmmission Expires 04/3012017 Road and 10' Trail Connection to Madison Village R'oa �n d -10' Trail C n to fM 63\tA-145 Proposed Roundabout 1 Madison Village S 1, vow-J pt1A58 ' 1 Proposed 10' Trail _ 'es t�W:q d ' North/South Connector Road �10, Trail 1� I Proposed Proposed Evergreen 10' Train J Screen ' A Proposed �A R/11 Dedication co Shenandoah o Memorial Park ' I SUBJECT PROPERTY Existing Signal I FREEDOM MANOR PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. Generalized Development P/on 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 FREDER/CK COUNTY NRG/NG9 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 0 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Owners Of property adjoining the land xvill be notificd OI the Planning Commission and the Board of' Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property Is ally property abutting the requested property oil the side of rear of ally property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property 111cludmg the parcel identification 11LImber which may be Obtained from the office Of the Commissioner Of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue i.v located on the 2nd floor of 1he Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Property Identification Number Address Name SEE ATTACHED LIST Property tl NameNameProperty it AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: December 2, 2015 - BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 13, 2016 - Recommended Approval C11 nX APPROVED ❑ DENIED k..o AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING # 11-15 FREEDOM MANOR WHEREAS, Rezoning #11-15, of Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC, submitted by Pennoni Associates to rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers, final revision date January 11, 2016 was considered. The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). The properties are further identified with PIN(s) 64-A-23, 64-A-20 and 64-A-19 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on December 2, 2015 and recommended approval; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 13, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to rezone 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) District and 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers, final revision date January 11, 2016. The conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner are attached. PDRes #01-16 9 • -2- This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this lath day of January, 2016 by the following recorded vote: Charles S. Del -laver, Jr., Chairman Aye Gary A. Lofton Aye Robert A. Hess Aye Robert W. Wells Aye Gene E. Fisher Absent Judith McCann -Slaughter Aye Blaine P. Dunn Aye A COPY ATTEST Arenda G. Garton Frederick County Administrator YIRGIMA: FREDERICK COUNTY.SC-1. This instrument of wsiting was produced to me on and with certificate acl<nowic:(Igement therM annexed was admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec, SS,1-802 of PDRes #01-16 $_ , and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. BOS Res. #051-16 4e�e'4 , Clerk CD 0-) CD • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # ' Ig Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedorn Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015; November 4, 2015; November 18, 2015; December 15, 2015; January 11, 2016 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised January 11, 2016. 1. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. 0 CY) W f�J • Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. Transportation CD 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the cn Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papermill Road in the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 1501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. • The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Said interparcel connection may be constructed within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 area of the Property. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 50'h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path to extend from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to link trail facilities planned for the adjoining development as depicted on the GDP. Page 2 of 0 40 Proffer Statement 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development Freedom Manor 4.1 For any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library $354 $338 _ $338 _ Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 1 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,745 1 $13,680 $13,880 4.2 In addition to the monetary contributions provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant shall contribute to Frederick County the sum of $250 per dwelling unit for transportation improvements within the general vicinity of the Property. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each dwelling unit. 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. CJ-1 Page 3 or5 i i Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 7. Landscape Buffer' O 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 50"' dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall cn at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common 0') boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 4 of 5 Ir 7 U 0 Proffer Statement Respectfully submitte , Shen -Valley Land of , Ing L DE IS A. A T Date: JANUARY 12016 STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this t •� day of My commission expires if- 1 3 a c 11'( Notary Public , Freedom Manor J,el(P 2fl1:5, by Deborah F. Bly Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Public Commission No. 360532 My Commission Expires 04/30/2017 0 v-i _.j 41 N,' Madison Longcrott Rd \ Village `. Road and 10' Trail Connection to �� Bentley Avenue Madison Village �r and 10' Trail I G' / Connection to TM 63-A-145 �� -JCA .-pe►�. 1.'� - - to to�t j r� Proposed to' Trail Westwood ])rive "Uri 4 ne North/South - \ 10' bail Connector Road Proposed Proposed Vine LaIIe Roundabout �`-� 0 Proposed 10, Trail ` Evergreen t Screen _ Proposed +� R/w Dedication ! o� ` Shenandoah o Memorial Park SUBJECT PROPERTY ?i oaf / Ezieti kg Signal ---- _-� FREEDOM MANOR PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. Generolized Development Plan 117 E Picadill St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 O Cb a VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FRMERICK COUNTY, ORGIN14 • Pennoni C� PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS January 13, 2015 Candice Perkins. AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Planning and Development 107 N Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester. VA 22601 RE: Freedom Manor — Revised Proffer Statement Dear Candice. LJI6) Based on input recently received, please find attached an executed version of a revised proffer statement and associated GDP. both dated January 11, 2016. for the Freedom Manor Rezoning application. I have also attached a redline version depicting the changes made to the proffer statement. which includes the following. 1) The interparcel connector to the eastern property boundary has been removed to address concerns raised that this could create a potential cut -through condition and present a possible safety hazard in the future if a connection were made to Route 522. The GDP has been revised to remove the referenced interparcel connection as well. 2) A monetary proffer of $250 per unit has been added for transportation improvements within the general vicinity of the site This proffer would provide for up to $75,000 for off - site transportation improvements. If you have any questions or comments. please feel free to contact me at (540) 667-2139. Sincerely. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. Patrick Sowers Senior Project Engineer Attachments 117 East Piccadilly Street • Winchester VA 22601 • Ph 540-667-2139 • Fx 540-665-0493 www pennon corn PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015; November 4, 2015; November 18, 2015; December 15, 2015; January 11, 2016 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised Oesember 15, 11, 2016. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. 40 Proffer Statement • Freedom Manor 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. 2. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papermill Road in the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 150'h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Said interparcel connection may be constructed within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 area of the Property. 2.4 The AppkGant shall provide a right-ef-way-reseRa# en -arse -to -the esteri;beiir}d��y of the Property, 56 feet 0 idth-arid-ire-the-geReraPecat on-depicted-er4he-GDP, o previde feF a future GeRReGtqeP,-between-4he-intereal-str-ee+,yste+4-fer-4he-Prepert and thee ad}ein4Rg-paFGel(s). Said-fight--ef-�aaii--be-dedi Gated, at noec+ +��e-PreRe cis-6ae+�ty w4h R-9 days of Fe sei iRg--wr+tten�-egYest frOm-F-reder�cl4-CeURty —(-Seed era GDP 3. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. Page 2 of 5 0 Proffer Statement 0 Freedom Manor 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path to extend from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to link trail facilities planned for the adjoining development as depicted on the GDP. 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 4.1 For any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Libra $354 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 1 $10,495 1$10,689 TOTAL $15,745 1 $13,680 1 $13,880 4.2 In addition to the monetary contributions provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant shall contribute to Frederick County the sum of $250 per dwelling unit for transportation improvements within the general vicinity of the Property. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each dwelling unit. 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. Page 3 of 5 4) Proffer Statement 0 Freedom Manor 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 4 of 5 0 Proffer Statement Freedom Manor Respectfully submitted, Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC Date: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by My commission expires Notary Public Page 5 of 5 11 Proffer Statement a Freedom Manor 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 4.1 For ft any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library $354 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,745 $13,680 $13,880 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501" dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 3 of 4 a 0 0 Pennon► PENNON] ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM TO: Candice Perkins, AICP FROM: Patrick Sowers DATE: November 19, 2015 SUBJECT: Freedom Manor — Revised Materials and PDFs Please find attached a signed copy of a revised proffer statement for Freedom Manor dated November 18, 2015, Per our recent discussions, the proffer statement has been revised to reduce the overall monetary proffer for single family detached units in recognition of 6.81 acres of the site being un-proffered RP zoning currently. This methodology should prove easier to track and enforce for the County in place of a proffer that does not provide for a monetary contribution for dwellings located on the 6.81 acre portion of the site. I have also revised the impact statement to reflect this modification and to correct the proposed density for Phase 1 of approximately 3.0 dwelling units per acre. Lastly, to aid in preparation of the agenda packet for the Planning Commission meeting, I have attached a CD containing PDF's of the revised proffer statement, impact statement, and the traffic studies for the application. If you have any questions or would like to discuss further, please contact me at (540) 667-2139. 117 East Piccadilly Street • Winchester, VA 22601 • Ph: 540-667-2139 • Fx: 540-665-0493 www.pennoni.com 0 0 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015; November 4, 2015; November 18, 2015 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised November 4, 2015. 1. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 2. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papermill Road in the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 1501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: • The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Said interparcel connection may be constructed within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 area of the Property. 3. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path to extend from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to link trail facilities planned for the adjoining development as depicted on the GDP. Page 2 of 4 0 0 Proffer Statement 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development Freedom Manor 4.1 For any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 $412 General Government $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library $354 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,455 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400 1 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,745 1 $13,680 $13,880 Oation for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 50"' dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 3 of 4 n LJ 0 Proffer Statement Respectfully submitted, "������� Shen-Valley _Land oldiW s g By: Dennis A Dysa Date: Novembe ; 19, 2015o's Freedom Manor STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 19 day of 2015, by My commission expires GF 3 a o t 7 Notary Public �J . Page 4 of 4 Deborah F. Bly Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Public Commission No. 360532 My Commission Expires 04/30/2017 0 • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015; November 4, 2015 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised November 4, 2015. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. Proffer Statement 0 0 Freedom Manor 2. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 58 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papermill Road in the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 150t" dwelling unit constructed on the Property: • The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. • The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Said interparcel connection may be constructed within the Phase 1 or Phase 2 area of the Property. 3. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 50th dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. 3.2 As part of the design and construction of the north/south connector road, the Applicant shall construct a 10' asphalt shared use path to extend from the site entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to link trail facilities planned for the adjoining development as depicted on the GDP. Proffer Statement • • Freedom Manor 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 4.1 For the first 75 single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $547 $406 $412 General Government $1,373 $1,050 $1,050 Libra $442 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,819 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $15,499 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $19,680 $13,680 $13,880 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 50th dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Page 3 or,} Proffer Statement Respectfully submitted, Shen -Valley L nd Ho di By: Date: November 2015 STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: Dennis A. Dysart Freedom Manor The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this s day of `h,--,, 2015, by My commission expires q Notary Public Page 4 of 4 i Deborah �, Bly / Y Commonwealth at Virginia C Notary Public Commission No. 360532 My Commission Expires 04/30/2017 III. PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT PAY TO THE ORDER OF'� 2393 1331/420 DATE CHECK RV! $ CCU anoro DOLLARS Boa• FORi�1R lEP.xK �=7 - - 63--2cl a'002393n' 1:0420003141: 702139295ESu' DR13 ENTERPRISES LLC DAN RYAN BUILDERS WASHINGTON W. ACCOUNT 64 THOMAS JOHNSON DRIVE SUITE OFREDERICK, MD 21702 DATE I.. JIIH . ,RECEIVED FROM;v` ADDRESS ` `t FOR r .r., j- l� lPrOJ-Z` ' ont ACCOUNT HOW PAID BEGINNING CASH BALANCE. AMOUNT ;LS70 b0 CHECK PAID OJJ "BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER RECEIPT 022474 !dam m2001 REIJIFORM0 S1657N-CL as July 17, 2019 Candice Perkins, AICP Deputy Director Department of Planning and Development Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 JUL 1 7 2019 f �; RE: Freedom Manor — Section One Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Dear Candice, As you know, the approved proffer statement for Freedom Manor permits the use of TDR's in lieu of monetary proffers. Specifically, Proffer 5.1 of the approved proffer statement reads as follows: 51 Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance) to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. To date, we have recorded Section One at Freedom Manor, providing for eight (8) single family lots. That recorded subdivision, depicting lots 33-35 and 78-82, is attached for reference. In order for occupancy permits to be issued for these lots, we will be utilizing eight (8) TDR's of the 30 TDR's which were assigned to Freedom Manor and then extinguished by Instrument #170007328, as attached. To aid in keeping track of the assigned TDR's, I have attached a spreadsheet showing the lots to which the TDR's will apply and their source document. As future sections progress, I will update this spreadsheet so that all TDR's used for the project are tracked with a single document. If you have any questions or would like to discuss further, please feel free to contact me at (540) 336-3333. Sincerely, Patrick Sowers Director of Land Development 420 W. Jubal Early Drive, Suite 103 • Winchester, VA 22601 • Ph: 540-667-2120 • Fx: 540-667-5414 Freedom Manor - TDR Assignment by Lot nnta- 7/17/19 Section Lot Housing Type TDR Source TDR's Assigned TDR s Remaining from Source 1 33 SFD Inst #170007328 1 29 1 34 SFD Inst #170007328 1 28 1 35 SFD Inst 4170007328 1 27 1 78 SFD Inst #170007328 1 26 1 79 SFD Inst #170007328 1 25 1 80 SFD Inst #170007328 1 24 1 81 SFD Inst #170007328 1 23 1 82 SFD I Inst #170007328 1 22 TDR Source Documents Total TDR's Inst #170007328 30 July 17. 2019 Candice Perkins. AICP I Deputy Director Department of Planning and Development Frederick County 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Freedom Manor — Section One Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Dear Candice, As you know, the approved proffer statement for Freedom Manor permits the use of TDR's in lieu of monetary proffers. Specifically, Proffer 5 1 of the approved proffer statement reads as follows Optlon for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the 'TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of arylall of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. To date. we have recorded Section One at Freedom Manor providing for eight (8) single family lots. That recorded subdivision. depicting lots 33-35 and 78-82, is attached for reference. In order for occupancy permits to be issued for these lots, we will be utilizing eight (8) TDR's of the 30 TDR's which were assigned to Freedom Manor and then extinguished by Instrument #170007328, as attached. To aid in keeping track of the assigned TDR s. I have attached a spreadsheet showing the lots to which the TDR's will apply and their source document. As future sections progress, I will update this spreadsheet so that all TDR s used for the project are tracked with a single document. If you have any questions or would like to discuss further, please feel free to contact me at (540) 336-3333. Sincerely, Patrick Sowers Director of Land Development 420 W Jubal Early Drive, Surte 103 • Winchester, VA 22601 • Ph 540-667-2120 • Fx: 540-667-5414 Freedom Manor - TDR Assignment by Lot Date:7/17/19 Section Lot Housing Type TDR Source TDR's Assigned TDR's Remaining from Source 1 33 SFD Inst #170007328 1 29 1 34 SFD Inst #170007328 1 28 1 35 SFD Inst #170007328 1 27 1 78 SFD Inst #170007328 1 26 1 79 SFD Inst #170007328 1 25 1 80 SFD Inst 4170007328 1 24 1 81 SFD Inst #170007328 1 23 1 82 SFD Inst #170007328 1 22 TDR Source Documents Inst #170007328 Total TDR's 30 U Proffer Statement 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development Freedom Manor 4.1 For any single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constricted on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issu?nW of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. UU 9a s, ng� �F �y } x11�o �s "Pk3 Table A. Monetary Contributions Single Family Single Family I Apartment Purpose Detached Units � Attached Units I Units Fire and Rescue $438 $406 i $412 General overnrnent $1,098 $1,050 $1,050 Library$354 _ _ _ _ $338 _ $338 _ Parks and Recreation _ _ $1,455 _ $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $12,400fi $10 495 $10,689 TOTAL $15,7451 $13,680 $13,880 4.2 In addition to the monetary contributions provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant shall contribute to Frederick County the sum of $250 per dwelling unit for transportation improvements within the general vicinity of the Property. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each dwelling unit. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the 'TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial fundiog for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. Page 3 of 5 170007328 Prepared by: J. Douglas McCarthy, Esquire VSB# 65713 Return to: McCarthy & Akers, PLC 302 W. Boscawen Street Winchester, VA 22601 Tax Parcel ID#: 64-A-23 Consideration: Exempt from taxation pursuant to Virginia Code § 58.1-811(A)(3) QUITCLAIM DEED AND EXTINGUISI-IMENf OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS THIS QUITCLAIM DEED is made as of July 5, 2017, by and between FREEDOM MANOR, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, as Grantor; and the FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA, as Grantee. WITNESSETI-I: That for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10.00, cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby quitclaim, release, and convey to the Grantee, all right, title, and interest of the Grantor in thirty (30) development rights (the "Development Rights"), which prior to this conveyance were attached to the following described property located in the County of Frederick, Virginia (the "Property, ): SENDING PROPERTY: All of those certain two tracts of land located in Gainesboro Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, the first containing 107.4221 acres, more or less, with Tax ID number Of 07-A-27 and the second containing 108.8357 acres, more or less, with a Tax ID number 07-A-28; AND BEING the same property that was conveyed to Virginia H. Wells by Deed dated November 15, 1962 of record in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 283, at Page 569. The said Virginia H. —0 Wells (also known as Virginia Wells Van Fleet) died testate on April 2, 1986. Her C-�, Will is of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Will Book 89, at Page 147. Her CD residuary estate, (which included the subject property described herein) was placed in cn her trust with the Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Winchester, Virginia. m Branch Banking and Trust Company became the Successor of Farmers and Merchants National Bank of Winchester, Virginia. By order of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Civil Action No. CL10000947-00 Branch Banking and Trust Company was discharged as Trustee and Anthony Eyre, Christopher Anthony Eyre, Anna Marie Eyre Kaczmarzewski, and Angela Michelle Eyre Escalona were appointed Co -Trustees. AND BEING the same thirty (30) development rights or "TDRs" transferred to the Grantor by Deed of TDR Transfer, dated July 5, 2017, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office immediately prior hereto. Also prior to this conveyance but subsequent to being severed, the Development Rights were conveyed to FREEDOM MANOR, LLC by deed dated July 5, 2017, and recorded immediately prior hereto, among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia. Grantee hereby accepts this conveyance, and agrees that the Development Rights are hereby extinguished and serve as monetary proffer payments within the Freedom Manor development for 30 residential dwelling units as specified in Rezoning dl] 1-15, proffers recorded as Instrument Number 1-1— '732-2 , recorded on '7- W-1 % , among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia. These rights may not be sold, transferred, or otherwise conveyed to any other party hereafter. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: —n 0 cn On behalf of Freedom Manor LLC: By: (SEAL) David B. ijr�}t y, M COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA [CITY] (eebWT-�} OFWjnehr�W The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of J1t 1 j by David B. Holliday, Manager of Freedom Manor, LLC. LC My Commission Expires: -bA 3 a q Virginia Notary Registration Number: _ 33`i$ Ito FMMISJ.DOUGLAS McCARTHY NOTARY NUAIJC COMMO CONWEALTH OF VfAGINfA REGISTRATION #334816 SION Y E7(IgRES MAY 31, 2G� On behalf of Frederick County, Virginia, -o 0 By: (SEAL) c-q Kris 'crncy, ount d inistrator co COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA [CITY] [COUNTY] OF W; n r k P l 1td The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tMs-%41, day of �a n c , 2oi 1, by Kris C. Tierney, Interim County Administrator, on behalf of Fredrrjck County, Virignia. fe * : U �F NOT Y BLIC MyQiYantr on Expires: it • 30 Tq l� itgShg ldotary Registration Number: '? o 1 t Lt Z'3 '11hu11101, APP VED AS TO FORM O a/2.c7 COUNTY ATTORNEY v I KUIN1A: Ffc--'DERICK C0UNTY5CT.�, This instrument of writing was produced to made Q' 20-1 i at a ..2Rn'-1 and with certificate acknowledgement thereto annexed was admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of $ e , and 58.1-801 have been ptdd, if aswwbla )46,4 xo'--�'Cknt Tax Map: 64-A-23 Magisterial District: Shawnee 190004229- N.)Q Consideration: $0.00 Return to: Freedom Manor, LLC 420 W. Jubal Early Drive, Suite 103 Winchester, VA 22601 HIS DEED OF DEDICATION AND DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CO DITIO��S, and RESTRICTIONS is made and dated this i +ti day of � , 2019, by and between F Eg EDOM MANOR, LLC, a Virginia liFilited liability company, party of the first part, hereinafter called the "Declarant", the COUNTY OF F EDERICK, VIRGINIA, party of the second part, hereinafter call the County; _FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY d/b/a FRE12ERICK WATER, party of the third part, hereinafter called the Authority; MICHAEL L. BRYAN, Trustee, party of the fourth part; and CURTIS G. POWER. III, Trustee, party of the fifth part. WHEREAS, the Declarant is the owner in fee simple of the real estate shown on that certain final plat drawn by P. Duane Brown, L.S., dated November 19, 2018, entitled "FREEDOM MANOR, SECTION ONE", (the "Plat') which final plat is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full, which is a portion of the property conveyed to the Declarant by that certain deed dated June 10, 2016 from Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, which deed is of record among the land records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument No. 160005456; and, WHEREAS, the Declarant desires to subdivide said real estate, as shown on the aforesaid attached final plat, into lots for the construction of dwelling units thereon, and the above -referenced final plat shows accurately the metes and bounds of the subdivided land, together with the dimensions of each lot thereof and also shows certain surrounding lands In said subdivision to be used as green space, sanitary sewer and water easements, stormwater, utility, and ingress -egress easements, all of which shall constitute a portion of that development known as Freedom Manor, and which common areas shall be owned and/or maintained by. Freedom Manor Homeowners Association, Inc. upon the terms and conditions set forth hereinafter; and WHEREAS, the Declarant now desires to subdivide the same into lots to be known as Freedom Manor, Section One, and the subdivision of said real estate is with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the undersigned Declarant which further desires to subdivide the aforesaid real estate in accordance with the provisions of Virginia law, including but not limited to the Property Owners' Association Act (Va. Code § 55-508 et seq.) as are applicable and in force and effect as of the date of execution of this Deed of Dedication and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions; and c-� l N O N WHEREAS, the Declarant desires to establish covenants on the subdivided land to provide for the maintenance of the open spaces and other facilities, it being intended that said covenants shall run with the property and be binding on all persons or entities having or acquiring any right, title, or interest in the property or any portion thereof; and WHEREAS, the Declarant has deemed it desirable to create a property owners' Association to which shall be delegated and assigned the powers of owning, maintaining, and administering the common areas and facilities, administering and enforcing the covenants set forth herein, and collecting and disbursing the charges for assessments and other fees set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Declarant has incorporated a nonstock corporation known as "Freedom Manor Homeowners Association, Inc." pursuant to the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia for the purposes of exercising the powers and functions of the Association as set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the property is subject to the lien of a Deed of Trust dated June 16, 2018, of record among the land records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument No. 160005457, and Michael L. Bryan, Trustee under the aforesaid Deed of Trust, joins in this instrument to evidence his consent thereto; and WHEREAS, the property is subject to the lien of a Deed of Trust dated June 27, 2018, of record among the land records of the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument No. 180006622, and Curtis G. Power, III, Trustee under the aforesaid Deed of Trust, joins in this instrument to evidence his consent thereto; NOW, THEREFORE, THIS DEED OF DEDICATION AND DECLARATION WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the premises and the benefits which will accrue by reason of this Deed, the Declarant does hereby subdivide that portion of the property depicted on the attached Plat containing 3.9142 acres into lots and parcels to be known as Lots 33 through 35, inclusive, Lots 78 through 82 inclusive, as well as public street right of way, Section One, Freedom Manor in accordance with the Plat attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. c-� N O W The Declarant does hereby dedicate unto the County, as public streets for public use, those certain roadways, containing 2.1370 acres in Section One, Freedom Manor as depicted on the Plat attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set out in full. The real estate herein divided shall further be subject to the access easements/rights-of-way, stormwater management easements, and sanitary sewer easements shown on the attached and incorporated plat, and each such easement shown thereon shall hereby be incorporated into the text of this Deed of Dedication and Declaration as if specifically set forth In full. Declarant agrees that the agreements and covenants stated in this Deed of Dedication and Declaration are not covenants personal to Declarant but are covenants running with the land which are and shall be binding upon the Declarant, its heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. All of the lots shown on the plat attached hereto shall be subject to the following restrictions, covenants and conditions, which shall constitute covenants real running with the land, and shall be binding upon all parties having any right, title and interest in and to the aforesaid lots or any part thereof, their heirs, successors and assigns, and shall inure to the benefit of each owner thereof. ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1. "Association" shall mean and refer to Freedom Manor Homeowners Association, Inc., a nonstock Virginia Corporation, its successors and assigns. Section 2. "Common Area" shall mean and refer to all real property (including improvements thereto) owned by the Association for the common use an.d enjoyment of the Members, including any private streets shown on the subdivision plats, and such additions thereto as may hereafter be brought within the jurisdiction of the Association. Section 3. "Lot" shall mean and refer to any of the lots designated upon the final plats of Freedom Manor, with the exception of the Common Area and streets dedicated to public use. t -r1 N O .p- Section 4. "Member" shall mean and refer to every person or entity who holds membership in the Association as set forth herein. Section 5. "Owner" shall mean and refer to the record owner, whether one or more persons or entities, of a fee simple title to any Lot which is a part of the Association, Including contract sellers, but excluding those having such interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. If more than one (1) person or entity is the record owner of a Lot, the term "Owner" as used herein shall be construed to refer to such owners collectively, so that there shall be only one (1) Owner of each Lot. Section 6. "Declarant" shall mean and refer to Freedom Manor, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, its successors and assigns. Section 7. "Act" shall mean the Property Owners' Association Act (Va. Code g 55-508 et seq,), or any successor statute(s) thereto, as amended from time to time. Section 8. "Property" shall mean and refer to that certain real property described as Freedom Manor, Section One, as platted and recorded by the plat recorded herewith, and such additions thereto which may from time to time brought within the jurisdiction of the Association, which property shall be identified as part of Frederick County Tax Map Nos, 64-A-23, 64-A-19, and 64-A- 20. ARTICLE II MEMBERSHIP Every person or entity who is a record owner of a fee or undivided fee interest in any Lot in Freedom Manor, which is subject by covenants of record to assessments by the Association, including contract sellers, shall be a Member of the Association. The foregoing is not intended to include persons or entities who hold an Interest merely as security for the performance of an obligation. Only one membership shall be accorded per Lot, Membership shall be appurtenant to and may not be separated from ownership of any Lot which is subject to assessment by the Association. Ownership of such Lot shall be the sole qualification for membership. -r c-� N CD U1 ARTICLE III VOTING RIGHTS Section 1. Voting Rights. Each Member of the Association shall have one vote for each Lot owned in which said Member shall hold the interest required for membership in Article II. When more than one person holds such interest in any Lot, all such persons shall be Members. The vote for such Lot shall be exercised as they among themselves determine, but in no event shall more than one vote be cast in respect to any Lot. Upon creation of additional Lots by the Declarant, the Owners of said Lots shall become Members of the Association according to the same terms established herein. Section 2. Board of Directors. The affairs of the Association shall be managed by a board of not less than three (3), but no more than nine (9) directors, who must be Members of the Association. The initial Board of Directors shall be appointed by the Declarant and serve until the first annual meeting following conveyance of the first Lot in Freedom Manor, to a grantee other than the Declarant; thereafter, the Board of Directors shall be elected by the membership as determined in the Bylaws of the Association. ARTICLE IV PROPERTY RIGHTS IN COMMON PROPERTIES Section 1. Members' Easements of Enjoyment. Every Member shall have a right and easement of enjoyment in and to the Common Area, and such easement shall be appurtenant to and shall pass with the title to every assessed lot, subject to: (a) The right of the Association to limit the number of guests of Members on the Common Area; (b) The right of the Association to adopt and enforce rules and regulations pursuant to the Act governing use of the Common Area, including, without limitation, the right to impose fines for violations thereof; (c) The right of the Association pursuant to the Act to suspend a Member's voting rights, rights to run for office within the Association, and/or rights to use of any recreational facilities N O U) offered by the Association, to the extent that access and the provision of utilities to such Member's Lot is not precluded, for any period during which any assessment against such Member's Lot remains unpaid, or for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days for any infraction of the Association's published rules and regulations; (d) The right of the Association to grant, with or without payment to the Association, licenses, rights -of -way, and easements through or over any portion of the Common Area; (e) The right of the Association, in accordance with its Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws, to borrow money and/or mortgage the Common Area for the purpose of improving the aforesaid Common Area; provided, however, that no such mortgage of the Common Area shall be effective unless an instrument signed by Members entitled to cast two-thirds (2/3) of the votes has been filed with the Association agreeing to such mortgage, and unless written notice of the proposed action is sent to every Member not less than twenty-five (25) days nor more than fifty (50) days in advance; and (f) The right of the Association to dedicate or transfer all or part of the Common Area to any public agency, authority, or utility for such purposes and subject to such conditions as may be agreed to by the Members; provided, however, that no such dedication or transfer shall be effective unless an instrument signed by Members entitled to cast two-thirds (2/3) of the votes has been recorded agreeing to such dedication or transfer, and unless written notice of the proposed action is sent to every Member not less than twenty-five (25) days nor more than fifty (50) days in advance. Section 2. Delegation of Use. Any Member may delegate, in accordance with the Bylaws, his right of enjoyment to the Common Area to the members of his family, his tenants, or contract purchasers who reside on such Member's Lot, However, by accepting a deed to such Lot, whether or not so expressed in the deed, every Owner of a Lot covenants that, if such Owner leases his Lot, the rental agreement for the same shall specifically require the 6 tenant(s) to abide by all applicable Association covenants and duly adopted rules and regulations. Section 3. Title to the Common Area. The Declarant, or such other entity as is vested with title at the time of conveyance, hereby covenants that fee simple title to the Common Area will be conveyed to the Association free and clear of all liens and encumbrances prior to the conveyance of the first Lot in Freedom Manor to a grantee other than the Declarant. ARTICLE V COVENANTS FOR MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENTS FOR THE ASSOCIATION Section 1. Assessments. The Declarant, for each Lot owned, hereby covenants, and each Owner of any Lot by acceptance of a deed therefor, whether or not it shall be so expressed in any such deed or other conveyance, is deemed to covenant and agrees to pay the Association (a) annual assessments or charges, and (2) special assessments for capital improvements, such assessments to be fixed, established and collected for time to time as hereinafter provided. The annual assessments and special assessments, together with interest thereon and costs of collection and attorney's fees, as hereinafter provided, shall be a charge on the land and shall be a continuing lien upon the Lot against which each such assessment is made. Each such assessment, together with interest, costs, and attorney's fees, shall also be the personal obligation of the person who was the Owner of such Lot at the time of the assessment was due. The personal obligation shall not pass to his successors in title unless expressly assumed by them, but shall continue as a lien upon said Lot as set forth hereinabove. The annual and special assessments, when assessed for each year, shall become a lien on the Lot for the entire amount of such assessment, but shall be payable as determined by the Board of Directors collected on a monthly, quarterly, semi-annual, or annual basis. The Common Area shall be exempt from all assessment requirements set forth in this Article. Section 2. Purpose of Assessments. The assessments levied by the Association shall be used to promote the recreation, health, safety, and welfare of the residents and Owners of Freedom Manor; for the improvement, repair, and maintenance of the Common Area, including any access easements/rig hts- of-way, stormwater management easements, and sanitary sewer easements shown on the attached and incorporated plat; for the payment of taxes; for the c=� N C7 co construction of improvements on the Common Area; for the maintenance of services related to these purposes or related to the use and enjoyment of the Common Area; and for such other purposes as the Board of Directors may deem appropriate. Services provided as part of annual assessments shall include, but not be limited to, maintenance of common open space, including recreation equipment, and trash removal for single family dwellings and townhomes as well as private street maintenance and grass mowing of unfenced yards for townhomes. Section 3. Establis ment of Annual Assessments. The Association must levy in each of its fiscal years an annual assessment against each Lot which has been conveyed by the Declarant. The amount of such annual assessment shall be established by the Board of Directors and written notice shall be sent to every Owner at such Owner's address of record with the Association at least thirty (30) days in advance of the commencement of each fiscal year, The first annual assessment shall be adjusted according to the number of months remaining in the fiscal year. The annual assessment shall become applicable to all Lots within a Section of Freedom Manor (as such Section is shown on a recorded subdivision plat) on the first day of the month following the first conveyance of a Lot within that Section to an Owner who is not the Declarant. The amount of the annual assessment shall be determined by the Board of Directors according to its estimate of the cost of providing services. Section 4. Basis of Annual Assessment. The Board of Directors shall have the authority to set the annual assessment for each Lot. The annual assessment for the first fiscal year shall be $480.00 per single family dwelling and $960.00 per townhome. Said Annual Assessment may be increased by the Board of Directors thereafter In accordance with the needs of the Association; provided, however, that any increase of more than ten percent (10%) from the year preceding requires the assent of fifty percent (50%) of the votes of Members who are voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose, written notice of which shall be sent to all members not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days in advance of the meeting, setting forth the purposes of the meeting. Section 5. Special Assessments for Capital Improvements. In addition to the annual assessments authorized above, the Association may levy in any assessment year a special assessment applicable to that year only, for the purpose of defraying, in whole or in part, the cost of any construction or 8 vi N CD �D reconstruction, unexpected repair or replacement of a described capital improvement upon the Common Area, including the necessary fixtures and personal property related thereto; provided, however, that any such assessment shall require the assent of fifty percent (50%) of the votes of Members who are voting in person or by proxy at a meeting duly called for this purpose, written notice of which shall be sent to all members not less than 30 days nor more than 60 days in advance of the meeting, setting forth the purposes of the meeting. Section 6. Quorum for any Action Authorized Under Sections 4 and S. At the first meeting called, as provided in Sections 4 and 5 hereof, the presence at the meeting of members or of proxies entitled to cast sixty percent (60%) of all votes shall constitute a quorum. If the required quorum is not forthcoming at any meeting, another meeting may be called, subject to the notice requirement set forth in Sections 3 and 4 and the required quorum at any such subsequent meeting shall be one-half (1/2) of the required quorum at the preceding meeting. No such subsequent meeting shall be held more than sixty (60) days following the preceding meeting. Section 7. Remedies of the Association In the Event of Default. If any assessment imposed pursuant to this Declaration or the Act is not paid within thirty (30) days from the due date thereof, such assessment shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum until paid in full. In addition, in its discretion, the Association may do any or all of the following; (a) Impose a late charge as previously established by rule; (b) Accelerate the due date of the unpaid assessment (if permitted to be paid in installments) so that the entire balance shall become due and payable immediately; (c) Demand payment of the assessment, plus all associated costs of collection, including attorney's fees, from the Owner; (d) Record a Memorandum of Lien against the Lot in accordance with the Act; (e) Bring an action at law against the Owner personally obligated to pay the assessment, and interest, costs, and attorney's fees shall be added to the amount of such assessment, whether or not a judgment is obtained; and (f) Suspend a Member's voting rights, rights to run for office within the Association, and/or rights to use of any recreational facilities offered by the Association, to the extent that access and the provision of utilities to such Member's Lot is not precluded. No Owner may waive or otherwise escape liability for the assessments provided herein by non-use of the Common Area or abandonment of his Lot. Furthermore, no Owner may claim any right of offset against the assessments provided herein on account of a claim against the Association and/or the Board of Directors for failing to perform their respective duties. Section 8. Subordination of the Lien to Mortgages. The lien of the assessments provided herein shall be subordinated to the lien of any mortgage or mortgages now or hereafter encumbering any Lot. Sale or transfer of any Lot shall not affect the assessment lien. However, the sale or transfer of any Lot that is subject to any mortgage, pursuant to a decree of foreclosure thereof, shall extinguish the lien of such assessments as to payments thereof, which become due prior to such sale or transfer. No sale or transfers shall relieve such Lot from liability for any assessments thereafter becoming due from the lien thereof. Section 9. Exempt Property. The following property subject to this Declaration shall be exempt from the assessments created herein: (a) Any property owned by the Association; (b) All properties dedicated to and accepted by a local public authority; and (c) Any and all lots owned by Declarant, its successors or assigns for which a final Certificate of Occupancy has not been issued by the appropriate local authority. Section 10. Working Capital Assessment, The Association shall determine and fix an amount for the Working Capital Assessment. The initial Working Capital Assessment shall be $200.00 per Lot. The Board of Directors shall have the authority to establish a different amount for the Working Capital Assessment in its sole discretion from time to time, Payment of the initial Working Capital Assessment shall be due at settlement for any Lot with a completed dwelling. 10 ARTICLE VI RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS 1. All Lots shall be used for single-family residential and accessory purposes only. The Declarant reserves the right for itself, pursuant to a recorded subdivision or re -subdivision plat, to alter, amend, and/or change any Lot line or subdivision plan or plat. No building shall be erected, altered, placed, or permitted to remain on any Lot other than one dwelling unit and other approved appurtenant structures for use by the occupant(s) of the dwelling unit. No structure or addition to a structure shall be erected, placed, altered, or externally improved on any Lot until the plans and specifications for the same shall be approved in writing by the Board of Directors or its duly appointed Architectural Review Committee. 2. No profession or home occupation shall be conducted in or on any part of a lot, except for those which receive no customers on the lot; provided, however, that Declarant, its successors and assigns reserve the right to use one or more of said Lots or a portion of the Common Area for business purposes in connection with the development, sales and operation of the subdivision. 3. No signs or advertising of any nature shall be erected or maintained on any lot except "For Sale" signs for said lot which signs shall not exceed five (5) square feet in area, or signs used by the Declarant, its successors and assigns to advertise the property during construction and sale, which shall be permitted on Lots or within open space until sales of all new homes in the subdivision are complete. No "For Rent" signs shall be allowed on any lot. 4. No boats, mobile homes, motor homes, campers, buses, trailers of any type, tractors, trucks, or other motor vehicles (other than automobiles, motorcycles, pickup trucks, and 3/4 ton (or less) vans) shall be permitted on any Lot or on any street, public or private, within the Property, except during the course of construction. No motor vehicle or material portion thereof which does not have a current license and current Virginia inspection sticker shall be permitted on any Lot. rU F\) S. No motorized vehicles of any kind shall be permitted upon any areas within .said subdivision except for the streets and parking areas constructed by Declarant. No right of vehicular access shall exist across any Lot in said subdivision except for those areas upon which streets or parking areas have been constructed by Declarant. 6. No animals of any kind (including livestock and poultry) shall be permitted on any Lot; provided, however, that dogs, cats and other usual household pets may be kept so long as they are not kept, bred or maintained for commercial or charitable purposes or in unusual numbers; provided, further that no dogs shall be permitted to run at large without restraint in said subdivision. No dog may be tied and left unattended outdoors. 7. There shall be no fencing or hedges in front of the front plane of any dwelling. All fencing to the side and rear any dwelling unit shall be attached to the individual unit. Pressure treated wood fencing and chain link fencing is prohibited. Fencing shall be privacy or picket style constructed of white composite/vinyl or picket style constructed of black metal. Fencing shall not exceed six (6) feet in height. No fence shall be constructed on any Lot until the plans and specifications for the same shall be approved in writing by the Board of Directors or its duly appointed Architectural Review Committee, No fencing shall be constructed within easement areas. 8. No fence, wall, tree, hedge, or shrub shall be maintained in such a manner as to obstruct sight lines for vehicular traffic. 9. Decks may be constructed of pressure treated wood or composite/vinyl, No deck shall be constructed on any Lot until the plans and specifications for the same shall be approved in writing by the Board of Directors or its duly appointed Architectural Review Committee. 10. No noxious or offensive activities shall be carried on upon any Lot, nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or may become an annoyance or nuisance to the neighborhood. 11. In the event that a dwelling is destroyed, the owner of the dwelling within thirty (30) days from said destruction shall clear away the portion of the dwelling unit and maintain the Lot in a neat and orderly condition. No structure other than a dwelling unit of at least the same dimensions and 12 N CA) architecture as the unit destroyed shall be constructed in the place of the original unit. 12. Each Owner shall keep all Lots owned by him and all improvements therein or thereon in good order and repair and free of debris, Including, but not limited to, the seeding, watering and mowing of all lawns, the pruning and cutting of all trees and shrubbery, and the painting (or other appropriate external care) of all buildings and other improvements, all in a manner and with such frequency as is consistent with good property management. In the event an Owner of any Lot shall fail to maintain the premises and the improvements situated thereon as provided herein, the Association, after notice to the Owner and approval by a two-thirds (2/3) vote of the Board of Directors, shall have the right to enter upon said Lot to correct drainage and to repair, maintain and restore the lot and the exterior of the building erected thereon. All costs related to such correction, repair or restoration shall become a special assessment upon such Lot due thirty (30) days after notice to the Owner. 13. No Lot shall be used or maintained as a dumping ground for rubbish. Trash, garbage or other waste shall be in sanitary containers. All equipment for storage or disposal of such material shall be kept in a clean and sanitary condition in the rear of the home or within the garage. No refuse or any container for same shall be placed or stored in front of any dwelling, except on the date of garbage pickup. 14. No trees shall be planted nor securing the approval of the local advised as to the location of al wires. other digging undertaken without first power company and without first being I underground electrical and telephone 15. No baby carriages, bicycles or other articles of personal property shall be deposited, allowed or permitted to remain outside of any dwelling unit except in the enclosed rear area. The Association shall specifically have authority to impound all such articles to remain outside in violation of this provision and to make a charge for the safekeeping and return thereof. 16. No exterior clothesline or hanging device shall be allowed upon any Lot. 13 M 17. The color of the paint on the exterior of every building on each Lot shall be the same as the original color unless approved in writing by the Board of Directors or Its duly appointed Architectural Review Committee, 18. If in the construction of any dwelling by Declarant there occurs an encroachment, then such encroachment shall be deemed a perpetual easement for the benefit of the dominant Lot. 19. No Lot shall be further subdivided or separated into smaller lots by any Owner. No portion less than all of a Lot, nor any easement or other interest herein, shall be conveyed or transferred by an Owner, provided that this shall not prohibit deeds of correction, deeds to resolve boundary disputes and similar corrective instruments, 20. To the extent not inconsistent with federal law, exterior television and other antennae, including satellite dishes, are prohibited unless approved in writing by the Board of Directors or its duly appointed Architectural Review Committee. Any satellite dish that is three feet (3� in diameter or smaller shall be exempt from this restriction. 21. Permanent above ground pools shall be prohibited. 22. The Board of Directors shall have the right to establish and maintain rules and regulations governing the use of the Lots consistent with this Declaration and the other governing documents of the Association, Violation of any of the covenants contained In this Declaration and/or any of the rules and regulations of the Association shall entitle the Association to all relief provided for in the Act, including but not limited to the ability to sue for injunctive relief and/or money damages, and the ability to recover all costs of enforcement, including but not limited to attorney's fees. The Board of Directors may establish an Architectural Review Committee by duly authorized resolution, to include the appointment of initial members of said Committee, and may further delegate to said Committee certain approval and enforcement tasks as the Board of Directors deems fit in its sole discretion. The Declarant reserves the right for itself and its successors in interest to waive any one or all of the restrictive covenants, conditions, reservations, and restrictions as to the sale or transfer of any future Lot or Lots. This waiver shall not affect the binding effect of the covenants, restrictions, and conditions upon 14 TO N U1 any other Lots. The Declarant further reserves the right for itself and its successors in interest to Impose additional restrictive covenants, conditions, reservation, and restrictions as to the sale and transfer of any future lot or lots and such imposition shall not affect the binding effect of these provisions upon any other lots. ARTICLE VII EASEMENTS Section 1. The Property is subject to those certain easements or rights of way so designated as access easements/rights-of-way, stormwater management easements, and sanitary sewer easements, as shown on the attached and incorporated "Final Plat of Subdivision — Freedom Manor — Section One", and each such easement shown thereon, as well as each such easement shown on a future Supplemental Deed of Dedication for additional Lots on the Property, shall hereby be incorporated into the text of this Deed of Dedication and Declaration as if specifically set forth in full. Section 2. The Declarant grants to, and the Association reserves for, the Association, a blanket easement for the Association's directors, officers, agents, and employees, and for all police, fire, emergency personnel and all similar persons, to enter on the Property in the performance of the functions provided for by this Declaration and the Association's Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws, and Rules and Regulations, and in the performance of governmental functions. In non -emergency situations, the rights accompanying the easements described in this Section shall only be exercised during daylight hours and with advance notice given to any Owner directly affected. Section 3. Each Lot within the Property is declared to have an easement, not exceeding one (1) foot in width, over all adjoining Lots and Common Area for the purpose of accommodating any encroachment due to engineering errors, settlement or shifting of a building, rainwater drainage, roof overhangs, gutters, or any other similar matter. Section 4. Reservations. (a) The Declarant reserves unto itself, its successors or assigns, the right to erect, maintain, operate and replace underground telephone and electrical conduits, related equipment, and other 15 M facilities, sewer, gas, water and television lines and related equipment, stormwater/drainage management facilities, and other utility equipment within the easements set forth on the attached and incorporated "Final Plat of Subdivision — Freedom Manor -- Section One" as well any final subdivision plats attached to a future Supplemental Deed of Dedication for additional Lots on the Property, (b)The Declarant further reserves unto itself, its successors or assigns, for a period of five (5) years from the date of conveyance of the first lot in Freedom Manor, a blanket easement and right on, over and under the ground within said subdivision to maintain and correct drainage of surface water in order to maintain reasonable standards of health, safety and appearance. Such right expressly includes the right to cut any trees, bushes, or shrubbery, make any grading of the soil or to take any other similar action reasonably necessary, following which the Declarant shall restore the affected property to its original condition as near as practical. The Declarant shall give reasonable notice of intent to take such action to all affected owners, unless in the opinion of the Declarant an emergency exists which precludes such notice. Reservation by Declarant of such blanket easement and rights contained herein shall not, in any way, obligate Declarant to undertake any maintenance, repair or corrective action whatsoever and shall not impose any liability or responsibility upon Declarant therefor, (c) The Declarant reserves unto itself, its successors or assigns, the right to grant and reserve easements or to vacate or terminate easements across all Lots and the Common Area as may be required by any governmental agency, authority, or utility in connection with the release of improvement bonds or the acceptance of public streets for state maintenance with respect to the Property. Section S. Frederick Water Easement, The Declarant reserves unto the Authority, Its successors and assigns an easement and right of way (the "Easement's for the purpose of installing, constructing, operating, maintaining, repairing, adding to or altering and replacing one or more present or future water mains and sanitary sewer lines, including, without limitation, fire hydrants, N �.1 valves, vaults, meters, building service connections and connection lines, sanitary lateral lines, manholes and other appurtenant facilities (collectively, the "Facilities'), for the transmission and distribution of water and the collection of sanitary sewer and its transmission through, upon and across the portion(s) of the Property shown as water, sewer, and sanitation easements on the attached and incorporated Final Plat (the "Easement Area', subject to the following conditions: (a) All Facilities which are installed in the Easement Area shall be and remain the property of the Authority, its successors and assigns, (b) The Authority and its agents shall have full and free use of the Easement for the purposes named, and shall have all rights and privileges reasonably necessary to the exercise of the Easement, including the right of access to and from the Easement Area, and the right to use adjoining land when necessary; provided, however, that this right to use adjoining land shall be exercised only during periods of actual construction or maintenance, and then only to the minimum extent necessary for such construction and maintenance; and further, this right shall not be construed to allow the Authority to erect any building or structure of a permanent nature on such adjoining land. (c) The Authority shall have the right to trim, cut and remove trees, shrubbery, fences, structures or other obstructions in or reasonably near the Easement Area, including those existing at the time of execution of this Deed, deemed by it to interfere with the proper and efficient construction, operation and maintenance of the Facilities; provided, however, that the Authority, at its own expense, shall restore, as nearly as possible, to their original condition all land or premises included within or adjoining the Easement Area which are disturbed in any manner by the construction, operation and maintenance of the Facilities. Such restoration shall include (i) the backfilling of trenches, (ii) repaving of asphalt, concrete, composite, and other impervious areas, (iii) the reseeding or resodding of lawns or pasture areas, and (iv) the replacement of trees, flowers, shrubbery, vegetable plants, porous/permeable paving, pavers, 17 c=� N cc structures, and other obstructions located outside the Easement Area, but shall not include the replacement of trees, flowers, shrubbery, vegetable plants, porous/permeable paving, pavers, structures, or other obstructions located within the Easement Area. (d) The Declarant, its successors and assigns, reserves the right to construct and maintain roadways over the Easement Area and to make any use of the Easement Area which may not be inconsistent with the Easement rights herein conveyed, or interfere with the use of the Easement by the Authority for the purposes named; provided, however, that the Declarant, its successors and assigns, shall not erect any building or other structure, or install any underground facilities or utilities, or change existing ground elevation or impound any water on or within the Easement Area without obtaining the prior written approval of the Authority. In the event a use of the Easement Area by the Declarant, its successors and assigns, is approved by the Authority, but requires the relocation of any of the Facilities or the adjustment of the depth of any of the Facilities, all costs required to accomplish such relocation or adjustment shall be paid by the Declarant, its successors and assigns. The Declarant, its successors and assigns, agrees that no vegetation other than (1) grass, (ii) shrubbery, and (iii) flowers and vegetable plants with root systems that extend no more than 12 inches below the surface at maturity, may be planted in the Easement Area; provided, however, that such flowers, shrubbery and vegetable plants are planted at the Declarant's risk and the Authority shall have no obligation to replant such flowers, shrubbery and vegetable plants nor to compensate the Declarant, its successors and assigns, for such vegetation in the event such vegetation is damaged or destroyed during the exercise of the Authority's rights under this Easement. (e) At such time as any portion of the land within the Easement Area is accepted by the Commonwealth of Virginia or any appropriate agency thereof for maintenance into the state highway system, all easement rights acquired by the Authority by this instrument in such portion of land shall cease and terminate, provided that the Commonwealth of Virginia or any 18 appropriate agency thereof concurrently grants to the Authority all necessary permits for the continued operation, maintenance, inspection, repair and replacement of its facilities in said location. (f) The Declarant, Its successors and assigns, covenants that it is seized of and has the right to convey said Easement, rights and privileges, that the Authority shall have quiet and peaceable possession, use and enjoyment of the Easement, rights and privileges, and that the Declarant, its successors and assigns, shall execute such further assurances thereof as may be required. (g) In the event the Authority notifies the Declarant, or their successors or assigns, of a violation of the terms of this Easement and the Declarant, its successors and assigns, does not cure such violation within thirty (30) days of such notice, the Authority may take such action as necessary to cure such violation, including ingress and egress over any portion of the Property deemed necessary by the Authority to access the Easement Area or to enforce the Authority's rights hereunder, All costs and expenses incurred by the Authority in exercising or enforcing its rights hereunder shall be paid or, at the Authority's election, reimbursed, by the Declarant, its successors and assigns, within thirty (30) days from the date the Declarant, its successors and assigns, receives a bill or invoice from the Authority for such costs and expenses. If such costs and expenses are not paid within the thirty (30) day period referenced In the preceding sentence, all such costs and expenses shall Immediately commence bearing interest at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. The Authority shall have the right to enforce the terms of this Easement by any remedy available at law or in equity, (h) If the Authority is adjudicated the prevailing party in any judicial proceeding between the parties regarding enforcement of this Easement, the Authority shall be awarded its costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees. 19 (i) The Declarant, its successors and assigns, agrees that the agreements and covenants stated in this Section are not covenants personal to the Declarant but are covenants running with the land which are and shall be binding upon the Declarant, its heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. Section 6. Storm Drainage Easements. The Declarant reserves unto the County, its successors and assigns, several variable width storm sewer easements and a twenty foot (20� storm sewer easement, identified on the Plat as "Storm Sewer Easement" and "20' Storm Sewer Easement" which shall run with the land and be perpetual easements for the purposes of constructing, operating, maintaining, adding to, altering or replacing present or future stormwater management facilities, storm drainage lines, storm sewer lines, or other drainage structures, including building connection lines, plus all necessary inlet structures, manholes, and appurtenances for the collection of stormwater and Its transmission through and across said Property of Declarant, said easements being more particularly bounded and described on the Plat. The foregoing easements are subject to the following conditions where applicable: (a) All storm sewers, manholes, inlet structures, and appurtenant facilities which are Installed in the easements shall be and remain the property of the County, its successors and assigns. (b) The County and its agents shall have full and free use of said easements for the purposes named, and shall have all rights and privileges reasonably necessary to the exercise of the easements including the right of access to and from the easements and right to use adjoining land where necessary; provided, however, that this right to use adjoining land shall be exercised only during periods of actual construction or maintenance, and further, this right shall not be construed to allow the County to erect any building or structure of a permanent nature on such adjoining land. (c) The County shall have the right to trim, cut, and remove trees, shrubbery, fences, structures, or other obstructions or facilities in or near the easements being conveyed, deemed by it to 20 interfere with the proper and efficient construction, operation, and maintenance of said easements; provided, however, that the County, at Its own expense, shall restore, as nearly as possible, the premises to their original condition. Such restoration shall include the backfilling of trenches, the replacement of structures and other facilities located outside the easements, but shall not include the replacement of structures, trees and shrubs, or other facilities located within the easements. (d)The County shall have the right to demolish all paving,.curbing, and/or guttering in the easements being conveyed, deemed by it to interfere with the proper and efficient construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of said stormwater drainage lines and appurtenant facilities; provided, however, that the County, at its own expense, shall restore all non - interfering paving, curbing, and/or guttering which are disturbed in any manner by the construction, operation, and maintenance of said stormwater drainage lines and appurtenant facilities. (e) Declarant reserves the right to construct and maintain roadways over said easements to the extent not prohibited or restricted by ordinance and to make any use of the easements herein granted which may not be inconsistent with the rights herein conveyed, or interfere with the use of said easements by the County for the purposes named; provided however, that Declarant shall not erect any building or other structure, excepting a fence, on the easements without obtaining prior written approval of the County. (0 Declarant covenants that it is seized of and has the right to convey said storm sewer easements, right and privileges, that the County shall have quiet and peaceable possession, use and enjoyment of the storm drainage easements, right and privileges, and that Declarant shall execute such further assurances thereof as may be required. (g) Declarant agrees that the agreements and covenants stated in this Deed are not covenants personal to Declarant but are PAI --n c-� N fV N covenants running with the land which are and shall be binding upon the Declarant, its heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. (h)The individual lot owners shall be responsible for maintenance of storm drainage easements conveyed herein in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Declaration. ARTICLE VIII GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 1. Enforcement, The Association, its successors or assigns, or any Owner, shall have the right to enforce, by any proceeding at law or in equity, all restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens and charges, now or hereafter, imposed by the provisions of this Declaration. Failure by the Association, its successors or assigns, or by any Owner to enforce any covenant or restriction herein contained shall in no event be deemed a waiver of the right to do so thereafter. All costs which the Association, its successors or assigns, or any Owner shall incur in the successful enforcement of the restrictions, conditions, covenants, reservations, liens, and charges, now or hereafter imposed, shall be borne by the party against which action is taken and which costs shall include reasonable attorney's fees, costs, and damages. Section 2. Amendment. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration shall run with the land and bind the land, and shall inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by the Association, or the Owner of any Lot subject to this Declaration, their respective legal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns, for a term of twenty (20) years from the date this Declaration is recorded, after which time said covenants shall be automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years. The covenants and restrictions of this Declaration may be amended by a properly executed and recorded instrument signed by not less than seventy-five percent (75%) of the Lot owners (excluding the Declarant). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Declarant reserves unto itself, and each Owner by acceptance of a deed or other conveyance of a Lot agrees, the right to unilaterally amend this Declaration or any other corporate document related to the Association for the earlier of (1) ten (10) years rom the date of recordation of this Declaration; or (ii) until the Declarant has conveyed all 22 N ram-) Cam) Lots in the Property, including any future Lots subjected to this Declaration, to third parties (other than third party entities controlled by the Declarant or any person or persons who hold a controlling interest in the Declarant). Section 3, Severabi i , The invalidation of any one of the covenants or restrictions contained herein by judgment or court order shall in nowise affect any of the other provisions which shall remain in full force and effect. The failure of the lot owners or the Declarant herein to enforce any covenants or restrictions shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the right to do so thereafter as to a default occurring prior or subsequent thereto. Section 4. Annexation of Additional Property. The Association may annex additional areas and provide for maintenance, preservation, and architectural control of Lots and Common Area within such additional areas, and so may add to its membership under the "Membership" article hereof; provided, however, that any such annexation shall require the written consent of more than fifty percent (50%) of the Owners. Notwithstanding the foregoing, within seven (7) years after the recording of this Declaration, no such consent shall be required for the annexation by the Declarant of any portion of real property adjacent to or contiguous to the Property, or separated from it only by a public street. Section 5. Dissolution: Upon dissolution of the Association, other than incident to a merger or consolidation, the assets of the Association shall be dedicated to an appropriate public agency to be used for purposes similar to those for which the Association was created. In the event such dedication is refused acceptance, such assets shall be granted, conveyed or assigned to any non-profit organization, for similar purposes. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Signatures appear on the following pages 23 FREEDOM MANOR, LLC, Declarant By: Davidj�!1-lo1fiday; j ar}a'ger 0 ONWEALTH 0f VIIR— GI fNIA CITY OUNTY OF k�c41 LvlG;9) �i2, , to -wit: Acknowledged before me this ``� day of �14 2019, by David B. Holliday, Manager of Freedom Manor, LLC, on behalf of said company. My commission gpires: 1 Z' 91 - Z Notary Public Nmt�► THstx► Sinbaek NOTARY . PU@UC GOIrM1of1M�-.Mw of Vkswe 11p. �7'2�Q�M W CWrNon N N c_ n FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY d/b/a FREDERICK WATE By: ASS-1 (printed name and title) COMM NZLTH --F-VIRGINIA CITY/t OuOF '1'Y��..1�. E , to -wit: �- II A kno le ed or�� fnethis day of Ir 1 l 2019, by b _ � UU 1 r) on behalf of Frederick County Sanitation Authority d/b/a Frederick Water. My commission expires: ��. �vA,?� Notary Public Tasheind Ldvonne Lonp NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of VirglMa Rag. i 726SP7 , L Corwissw Ego" CI �� Michael L. Bryan, Trustee COMMONWEALTH QF VIRC IA CITY/Y OF�,� , to -wit: Acknowledged before me this .Aq 4A_ day of 2019, by Michael L. Bryan, Trustee. My commission expires: 020 1 Notary Public SHARON M. BUTLER NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Virglnla Registratlon No, 2 31 My Commission Expires 7- Curtis G. PoH er, III,, Trustee COMMONWEALTH OF VIA ITy OUNTY 01 . I' = , to -wit; Acknowledged before me this day of , 2019, by Curtis G. Power, III, Trustee. My commissior�,expires: Z 3S ZZ . 5j'aL,- Notary g0bli Nanq►'1'{brx► Slnback NO�RY,PUBLIC (�MNtImvxo1 h of V1r9Wft ilk. •y292148 My CoWp*W*ks' t%7Mg2"_ 12F HAW p_T N � N g, W re lyy 'it0, � l�o0d 'nds one Dr. �$ SITE Ype Ln. a VICINITY MAP I ourelrood or SCALE.' I' = 2000' SU 1 NSLONN ADMINL TRAT Z01 q FREDERICK WATER DATE' 7/-c-15 VIRGINIA DE'PARTM£INr OF 7RAN5PORTA 17ON DATE OMIYERS {,�1,4�N„AIF THE ABOVE AND FORECOING SUBDIVISION OF THE LAND OF FREEDOM MANOR, LLC [PIN 64-A-23] AS APPEARS /N TV ACCOMPANYING PLATS; IS W1T9 NE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRES OF TH£ UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS AND TRUSTEES, IF ANY. ON BEHALF OF 0 MAN L C 4 D ., STATE OFVIRGINIA, AT LARGE /� COUNTY OF FREDERICK THE FOR�C�NG INS TFURENT WAS ACKNOWEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 2011 BY _ j(ild 1 a'ON BEHALF OF FREEDOM MANO , LLC l I P/ � Nancy]] i ii,pi Nancy TIlson Slnblm* NOTARY PUBLi, NOTARY PUYUC 110TARY PUBLIC C0rnmonW*0lth of Virgm,, C0m=nwealth 0f Wr9"lI 3 M� #7292148 Reg, #7292148 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MY conM11 011 6*ku 12/31/lftfommisSion Expires 12/31/2022 SWIQWs MUZENA / HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE PROPERTY CONTAINED IN TNIS SUBDIVISION IS A POR77ON OF THE PROPERTIES CONVEYEO TO FREEDOM MANOR, LLC BY DEED DATED JUNE 10 2016, SAID OECD RECOR0£0 IN THE OFFICE Of &F CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINIA AS INSTRUMENT 160005456 FINAL PLA T OF SUOII/ISION 'LTH OR P FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE��� a SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P. Duane Br own FREDERICK COUNTY, KPGINIA Lic. No. 001285 Nov. /9, to /a CgkD S U RN `��04 DATE.' NOVEMBER 19, 2018 COVER SHEET SHEET 1 OF 10 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. DRAWN BY HBK 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL office@narshandlegge.com OWC NAME.' id10174—sub—sec> CURIE TABLE QRW RADIUS ARC 00 RINGjQb4 TANGENT Cl J1J00 4.91 4,91 N 065819 W 00V55 2.45 C2 15.00 JJ.89 3L35 S 46'J526 E 774021 ?0.13 CJ 25.00 J9, 96 J5.84 S 49 06 46 W 91 J516 25 70 C4 36J.00 7J28 7J.15 S 0906 07 W 11 J359 J6.76 C5 175.00 12.8J 12.82 N 41 J710 W 047159 ' . 42 C6 25.00 J5.75 J2.78 N 802926 W 81:5631 21.71 C7 518.49 25.71 25.71 S 595733 W 0250 J0 12.86 08 J38.00 62,27 62.19 N 5545JI E 10J321 J1.12 C9 JJ8.00 J29.9J J16.99 N 22J059 E 5555 42 J79, 45 CIO JJ8.00 11, 64 1L 64 N 0626 04 W 013824 5.82 25 6 JJ00NOl46 -2 4 B2J5.5 21.96C11 CIZ J63.00 6>.37 6/.JO N 387358E 09411J J0.76 CJJ J6J DO 61. 46 61.J8 N 28:i221 E 09 42 00 J0.80 C14 J6J.00 55.78 5572 N 197714 £ 084815 27.94 C15 J/3.00 94.66 94. JO S 0217830 W 1779 4J 47.70 C16 JIJ.00 86.85 86.57 S 184520 W 15:5J55 4J71 C17 JIJ00 86.85 86.57 S J4:i915 W 155J55 4J71 CJB J/J. 00 18.20 l8.20 S 4476 09 W OJ79 53 9.10 C19 l00.00 19, 93 19.89 S 51 J8 J6 W I JI25 0J !0.00 C20 J51.15 7.81 7.81 S 575921 W 01'1619 J.91 C2/ 351.15 19.94 19.44 S 6072 44 W I OJ IO 1B 9.72 AREA SUMMARY AREA IN LOTS 33 10,453 SO. FT. 34 8,921 SQ. FT. 35 8,090 SQ. FT. 78 10,720 SO, FT. 79 10,020 SQ. FT. 80 10,000 SO, FT. 81 9,829 SQ, FT, 82 9,382 SQ. FT. 77,415 SO. FT. 8 LOTS 9,677 SO. FT. 8,090 SQ. FT. PIN 64-A-23 REMAINDER LINE TABLE LINE I BEARING DISTANCE 11 N 072516 W 28.57 L2 S 85b5J7 E 14.90 LJ N 072516 W 18.57 14 S 62vi W 17.J6 L5 S 6J2147 W 18.57 L6 S 684621 W 9.88 77 N 2JJ358 W 11.82 LB IS 654959 E 1 25..J1 1.7772 AC. AREA IN LOTS NUMBER OF LOTS AVERAGE LOT SIZE MINIMUM LOT SIZE 2,1370 AC. AREA IN R/W 3.9142 AC. TOTAL AREA SUBDIVIDED 22.9592 AC NOTES 1. IRON RODS ARE TO BE SET AT ALL CORNERS NOT PREWOUR Y MONUMENIED. 2. £XISDNG ZONING- RP (RESIO£N71AL PERFORMA)KE) J. EXISTING USE- (VACANT 4. 8RL OENO7ES BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, WGINIA DATE 806WER 19, 2018 o��LTH OF P. Duane Brown Lic. No. 001285 A/ov. /4, 2018 SHEET 2 OF 10 CAND SURg���4 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET - WINCHESTER, 1IR13INIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 - FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL officeWnarshandlegge.com DRAWN BY.• HBK DYS NAIVE- &10174-sub-secl 0 O l LOT 78 LOT 35 LOT J4 LOT 79 `\ `�'q LOT 33 \ / LOT 80 �y L\c—OT 81 LOT 82 P/N 54-A-2J R614NNO£R --m c-� 'lb Lq N w STq P/N 64-A-2J R6VNhV& SHEET INDEX L 0TS EET .iJ-J5 78-80 8 E!7 81-82 9 I \ / I \ P/N 64—J—A PIN 6J—A-146 SH£NANDOAH TNOMAS W. 8REEDL 0vi DA V I D DRIVE MEdIOR/AC PARK, INC. I OB 401 PG 672 D8 9J4 PG 694 VARIABLE WIDTH R/W VA. SEC. ROUTE 644 N PAPERMILL ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY KEY MAP GRAPHIC SCALE 100' 0 50' 100' 200' 1 inch = 100 /1. FINAL PLAT OF SUSDI VISION FREEDOM MANOR SEC7701V ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE.• NO6URER 19, 2018 1 SCALE. l" = 100' 1 SHEET J OF 10 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET - WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 - FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL officeHmarshandleaae.com TH OF Df r U7"�Lcn�x-s-9 P. Duane Brown Lic. No. 001285 Nov. /9, 20/8 tAhb SURN�;�� DRAWN BY.HBIf DWG NAME- &10174—sub—secl -n CD N L W ly� \\ N / PIN 64-A-2J Q� a Qua \ b� 10 Qp Vw pQ 00 O F DAVID DRIVE �416 s ?for VARIABLE WIDTH R/W E 842151' W 16.66' N ?82J'19' W N JlVIM' W- - — — — 50..99, — — 52.OJ' VA. SEC. ROUTE 644 N PAPERMILL ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY GRAPHIC SCALE- 40' 0 20' 40' 80 1 inch = 40 ft. FINAL PL AT OF SUSDI VISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREOERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE- NOVEMBER 19, 20181 SCALE. 1 " = 40' I SHEET 4 OF 10 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL office@marshandlegge.com o ��r P. Duane Brown Lie. No. 001265 Nov. /9,Zoie �h'0 SURN��O� ORAM BY.• HBK OWC NAME.• &1O174-5ub-sect CD ry SEE SHEET 9 1 qo w L7 1 u, ,.1 PIN64—A-2J ` 1 RIWA I VD P/N 64—A-2J I ASWA & \ C) ',0t. \ \Ln i DAVID DRIVE VARIABLE WIDTH RM to w 10 w W W N (n Uj (N N 287J'19" W 599.99' VA, SEC. ROUTE 644 — PAPERMILL ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY SEE SHEET 2 FOR LINE TABLE FINAL PLAT OF SURDI VISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA GRAPHIC SCALE 40' 0 20' 40' 60, I inch = 40 It. DATE NOVFMB£R 19, 20181 SCALE 1 "= 40' I SHEET 5 OF 10 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL officedmorshandlegge.com jFTH OD or r9. P. Duane Brown Lic. No. 001285 IVoV. 191 20/8 LgND SURN��o4 DRAWN BY HSK DiYG NAME: 00174-sub-sect —o N W *c4' G9 W 9 PIN 64-A-23 REIi A iER V- I •i aim 091 ,fig• E w w N S ,;8'4746' ---132pg DAVID DRIVE VARIABLE WIDTH R/W /'-N 612446" E 16.5_4'_ N 282J'19` W 599.99' VA. SEC. ROUTE 644 — PAPERMILL ROAD VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT-OF-WAY CRAPPIC SCALE 40' 0 20' 40' 80, 1 inch = 40 It. FINAL PLAT OF SUSDI VISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHAMEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREOERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE: NOEMBER 19, 20181 SCALE I " = 40' I SHEET 6 OF 10 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL office@rnarshandlegge.com LTH OF' Dt � rir P. Duane Brown Lie. No. 001285 Nov. l9, 20/8 �/i'vD SUR���a4 ORA4 V 8Y H81( DWG NAME:- W0174-sub-sect . P/N 64-A-23 REMUMIAER COyP441FLEC ll/ 611VI PO /49 Pc 2gsA �ENr i s N 410 L9 W 9 �0'Q/b ,--'CO LOT 35 8,090 Sq Feet / Ok 0.1857 ACres LOT J4 8921 Sq. Fee! 0.2048 Acres LOT 79 LOT J3 a wy \ 10, 45J Sq. Fee! o\ `ram ` Q \ 0.2400 Acres mom\ a+ 71 LLJ LOT 80LU v SEE DETAIL 3g31'10 W C5 O. STORM SE{i£R \ j6 azI � PIN 64—A-2J EASEMENT / 1 REA7EO RMAND& / 5 931��' LOT 81 o, � G SEE SHEET 2 FOR LINE AND �j! CURVE TABLES _ I GRAPHIC SCALE SEE SHEET 9 40' 0 20' 40' BO' 1 Inch — 40 ft. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA `J LOT M A=7.66' s\ DETAIL 7..54' SCALE.• 1 "=JO DATE- NOVEMBER 19, 20161 SCALE: 1" = 40' 1 SHEET 7 OF 10 1 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRCINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL o(fice0marshondlegge.com LTH OF Df P. Duane Brown Lic. No. 001285 za 'yD SUR'0�v ORAW BY- HBK DWG NAME.• &10174-sub-secl PIN 64—A-23 RU NHO& N 2�� oti 90 Cl) FSTq Ln No, A,eRN �i0 COl1PgNYEfFC �RCYN1 7'04 OB pj Y90 2,y 4Z�FNT i / .. \ LOT35 20' sroRM SElifR To��o EASEMENT HEREBY CREATED LOT 78 / /. ip LOT 34 w 10, 720 Sq. Feel`y\ N 0.2461 Acres sB,p\ \ F1 \ lb cb LOT 79 i 10, 020 Sq. Feet �'f \ y / / 0.2300 Acres 60 / ^ \ LOT 80 \� \ 072" / 10,000 Sq. Feel , \ 0.2295 Acres PIN 64—A-23 - ' N 47 \ RUAM& m 12' TRAIL EASEMENT LOT 81 HEREBY CREAIFO \ SEE SHEET 9 1i GRAPHIC SCALE SEE SHEET 2 FOR LINE AND 01?VL" TABLES FINAL PLAT OF SUBDI VISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHA MEE- MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 40' 0 20' 40' 80' 1 inch = 40 ft. DATE.' NMUBER 19" 20181 SCALE 1 " = 40' 1 SHEFT B OF 10 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCIIESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 - FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL officeflmorshandlegge.com o9yTH OF D01 f r P. Duane Brown Lic. No. 001285 Nov. �4, 2dTa ffl L b suR`1<4 ORAW BY.• HBK DiYG NA40 &10174-sub-sect SEE SHEET 8 O SEE SHEET 7 LOT 79 / 12" TRAIL EASEMENT \ \' \\ g LOT .3J \� HEREBY CREATED G LOT80 o z 'g 19 ;?A ;, ,44.7 1. LOT 81 9, 829 Sq. Fee! 0.2256 Acres ` v ` a g PIN 64-A-2J 8' BRL _ _ m I r i4i�lAA1laE1P � — — — — —. — 14,3, 0271 N 317225 W PIN 64-A-2J RfiUWO& BRL I II h �I IN LOT82 g I 0.2154 Acres T I � tilN L — 8' BRL N 23:ijM;"AY 130. f5, v L7 NJ43Jql 6.8A=3.42" LOT 81 ml rot �I LOT82 hl b I hl I� PL7DETAIZ SCALE 1 "=J0 STORM SEWER EASEMENT 1 �n HEREBY CREAlo (SEE DETA11) 1 DAVID DRIVE SEE SHEET 5 FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION FREEDOM MANOR SECTION ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SEE SHEET 2 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES GRAPHIC SCALE 40' 0 20, 40" 80' 1 inch = 40 ft. DATE.• NOVEMBER 19, 20181 SCALE.• I " = 40' 1 SHEET 9 OF 10 1 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — "NCHESTER, VIRGINIA 11101 PHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL o(fice@marshandlegge.com jTH OP L I,� c P. Duane Brown Lic. No. 001285 Nov, /9, 20l8 lAN� SDR'1��o4 DRAWN 8K H8f( OW NAME- 1WO174—sub—secl o�� j 290 PIN 549-A-27 W LEMS E. RE19 �yFSf9 C? INS[, 1500014272 PIN 64D-A-1B �///PIN 640-A-30 Z'" ROXANNE LOUISE AIADICAN / ANN S CROSSINST.120000166 N6151 E 20'SD{YER INST.0400095141EASEMENT � 0)l s 1 INST. 180006920 PIN 64-A-23A Ac9P 1 10..00' ROBIN CASEY-HIL/SCH N86 4112E INST. 0JO029416 p�yD 10.00' iysT �GJ�000 N 02:i5'12" W 1 ?D c�?so / 85.70' // N86:36241C T 48.83' PIN 640-1-8-A WADER. MANUEL e9p�s Oc 9� S 865725" E INST. 070014170 OpBq�'�.? s1jF� 182.88, Ai A lfjp �r PIN 640-2-A-6 0 16�p S 594820" E / � ✓OHNNY /I. ANDERSON / 116.15' / DR 317 PC 101 °c6cY, s / / S 115766 " £ / a 2 / / 20' fREDERICK WA 1FR EASEMENT / l O HEREBY CREATED S 8505:37" E / 561.52' Z--12O'FRC,9ER1(^ff EASE ENT ITR/ N074017"W / / 10' / r 137. 49' / / / PIN 64-A-23 I \ 18.74' 22.9992 ACRES (REMAINDER) /PP�o off° i6.00' OT i5 LOT 78 LOT 34 NORRfPN GIpC/ l O I LO[ 79 FIFCl7�jR�O�pgNN/4 / \ COT 80 LOT .i3 Op Z/� Pc ? SyENT 107,81 I I / COT 82 GRAPHIC SCALE 200' 0 100' 200' 400' 1 inch = 2001t. FINAL PLAT OF SUBDIVISION TH OF y f FREEDOM MANOR o �Gr� SECTION ONE SHAWNEE MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT "Duane rown FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Lic. No. 001285 Nov, /4 ,2c1a DATE. NOIiEMBER 19, 2018 SCALE. 1 " = 200' SHEET 10 OF 10 `'h'D sul 01 I ;i Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET - WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 DRAWN BY HBK PHONE (540) 667-0468 - FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL office@morshandlegge.com OW NAME.' id10174-sub-sect v crculNIA: Fk. UERICK COUNTY.SC; i. This instrument of writing was produced to melon and with certificate acknowledgement thereto annexed was admitted to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 58.1-802 of $ NA , and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. 4�M4 todgr"4j Clerk r �t IV. AGENCY COMMENTS Patrick Sowers From: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT) <Rhonda.FunkhoUser@VDOT.Virginia.gov> on behalf of Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT) <Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov> Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2015 2:35 PM To: Ronald Mislowsky; Douglas Kennedy; Patrick Sowers Cc: John Bishop; Short, Terry (VDOT); Campbell, Adam (VDOT); Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT); Ingram, Lloyd (VDOT); Lineberry, Jeff, PE (VDOT) Subject: Freedom Manor - VDOT Comments to TIA & Proffers VDOT's District Planning Section has completed their review of the 2"d submission of the Freedom Manor TIA. The TIA is in compliance with VDOT's TIA regulations (24 VAC 30-155) and we have no outstanding or additional comments that need to be addressed. We would like to provide the following recommendations on the proffers dated Sept. 4, 2015, submitted with the TIA: Update the references to "hiker/biker trail" in proffers 2.1 and 3.1 to "shared use path". Update the minimum right-of-way dedication of 56' from centerline in proffer 2.1 to 58' to accommodate the 10' wide shared use path, if provided in the right-of-way. The provided 48' width without the shared use path in the right-of-way is adequate. Correct the spelling error of Papermill Road in proffer 2.2. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. I Area Land Use Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 voice: 540/984-5615 fax: 540/984-5607 e-mail: Matthew. Smith Ccbvdot.virginia.aov i COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 February 3, 2015 Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates, Inc. 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601. RE: Rezoning Comments for Freedom Manor Subdivision Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Sowers: We have completed our review of the site plan for the rezoning application for the proposed Freedom Manor Subdivision and offer the following comments: 1. Refer to the Impact Analysis Statement: Add a paragraph dedicated to the discussion of stormwater. 2. Refer to Page 4, Solid Waste: Expand the discussion to indicate that the residential development shall include the requirement for a private refuse hauler. 3. Refer to the Prof7er Statement, Page 3 ol'4, Paragraph 6: Expand the discussion of the property owners' association (POA) to include the requirements for maintaining open space and stormwater management facilities. In addition, the POA shall be responsible for solid waste collection and disposal (i.e., curbside pickup, dumpsters, etc.) I can be reached at 722-8214 ii'you should have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, 4-011. k�u�� Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: Planning and Dcvelopment 107 North Kent Street, Second Floor, Suite 200 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 John .I. I3auserman Deputy Chief Firc Marshal Lice Safety Division January 26, 2015 Pennoni Associates Inc. c/o Patrick Sowers 117 L. Piccadilly Street Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 0 COUNTY OF FIZEDLRICK. VIRGINIA FIRI: AND IZF.SCUE DEPAR"fivlENT 1080 Coverstone Drive Winclicster. VA 22602 Re: Rezoning Application — Front Royal Pike and Papermill Road, Winchester, VA Dear Mr. Sowers, -lark Showers Billy Pifer Kcnm Scott Assistant Dire ivlarshal Please find attached the plan approval from the Fire Marshal's office regarding your Rezoning application. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to call our office. Best regards, zm QI Barbara Johnson Secretary Attachment Life Safety (540) 665-6350 jbauscrm0)lcva.us Fax (540) 678-4739 • E Rezoning Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire Marshal Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept. 1800 Coverstone Drive Attn: Fire Marshal Winchester, Virginia 22602 Public Safety Building (540) 665-6350 1800 Coverstone Drive Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Fire Marshal with his review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Pennoni Associates c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Winchester, VA 22601 Location Of property: East and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the signalized inter- section of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road requested: Current zoning: RA & RP Zoningr e uested: RP Acreage: 47.5415 Fire Marshal's Comments: ME PiSH L3 FR- EDEMCK COUNTY Fire Marshal's Signature & Date: ZZ Notice to Fire Marshal - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 22 RECEIVED JAN 16 205 Oderick County Fire and Rescue • Department. Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Control number Date received Rz15-0001 1/16/2015 Project Name Freedom Manor- Front Royal PK & Papermill Rd. Address City 117 E Piccadilly St. Suite 200 Winchester Type Application Tax ID Number Rezoning Current Zoning Date reviewed 1 /22/2015 Applicant Pennoni Associates - Patrick Sowers State Zip VA 22601 Fire District 21 RA to RP c�m�endati©nc Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Plan Approved e Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway/Aisleway Width Not Identified Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Yes Kenneth Scott Date Revised Applicant Phone 540-667-2139 Rescue District 21 Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System Yes Fire Lane Required No Special Hazards No Signature Title • 0 Rezoning Comments Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Parks & Recreation with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Pennoni Associates c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: East and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the signalized inter- section of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road Current zoning: RA & RP Zoning requested: RP Acreage: 47.5415 Department of Parks & Recreation Comments: 1. Monetary proffers applied only to 75 of the proposed 100 detached units does not appear — to meet impacts of the development. 2. The north/south hiker -biker trail recommended to follow west side of connector road — rather than property boundary as shown. This to match approved trail in Madison Village. 3. Hiker -biker trail recommended along east/west interparcel connector. Pks. & Rec. Signature & Date: / 1, _,, �1^�r.� t__U: 2 Z I S Notice to Department of PAI-ks & Recreation - Please Return 'This Form to the Applicant 23 0 0 Rezoning Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540)868-1061 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Sanitation Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: Pennoni Associates c/o Patrick Sowers Telephone: 540-667-2139 Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: East and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the signalized inter- section of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road Current zoning: RA & RP Zoningrequested: RP Acreage: 47.5415 Sanitation Authority Comments: Please see attached _ Sanitation Authority Signature & Date: Notice to Sanitation Authority - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 25 S • • Rezoning Comments Frederick -Winchester Health Department Nlail to: Frederick -Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722-3490 Hand deliver to: Frederick -Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please till out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick - Winchester Health Department with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other Applicants Name: Pennoni Associates do Patrick Sowers Telephone: 540-667-2139 Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: East and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the signalized inter- section of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road Current zoning: RA & RP Zoning requested: RP Acreage: 47.5415 Frederick -Winchester Health Department's Comments: P41"04 Nhet-mo (, 4413 djOb!:ck,o►s la AthC" ainQ UPSFAti Jti ftkr, _ Health Dept. Signature & Date: / 2 i9 Notice to Health Department - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 26 • 0 Frederick County Public Schools ... to ensure rill students cm excellent Cduccltion K. Wayne Lee, Jr. LEED AP . Coordinator of Planning and Development • leew@frederick.kl2.va.us February 10, 2015 Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Freedom Manor Rezoning Application Dear Patrick: Frederick County Public Schools has reviewed the Freedom Manor rezoning application submitted to us on January 16, 2015. We offer the following comment: The cumulative impact of this development and other developments in Frederick County will require construction of new schools and support facilities to accommodate increased student enrollment. This development proposal includes a range of possibilities. The case that generates the most students is 100 houses, 100 townhouses, and 100 apartments. We estimate that, in this case, the development will house 93 students: 25 high school students, 23 middle school students, and 45 elementary school students. In order to properly serve these additional students, Frederick County Public Schools would spend an estimated $1,048,000 more per year in operating costs (or $3,493 average per unit per year) and an estimated $3,891,000 in one-time capital expenditures (or $12,970 average per unit). You will find, enclosed with this letter, a more detailed assessment of the estimated impact of freedom Manor on FCPS, including attendance zone information. Please feel free to contact me at Iecw Qyf-ederick.k I2.va.uS or 540-662-3888 x88249 if you have any questions or comments. Sincerely, K. Wayne Lee, Jr., LEED AP Coordinator of -Planning and Development enclosure cc: Dr. David Sovine, Superintendent of'Schools Mr. Albert OrndorlY, Assistant Superintendent f rr Administration Mr. John Grubbs, Transportation Director Mrs. Elizabeth Brown, Supervisor ol'Driver Operations 1415 Amherst Street P.O. Box 3508 Winchester, Virginia 22604-2546 www.frederick.k12.va.us 540-662-3889 Ext. 88249 540-6624237 fax Project Name: Assessment Date: Housing Type Single -Family Detached Single -Family Attached Multifamily Mobile Home/Other Totals Frederick County Public Schools Development Assessment Freedom Manor February 10, 2015 Student Generation Housing Units# 100 100 100 0 300 School Cost Program Capacity Per Student Cost Students Generated by this Development This Development's Impact on FCPS Capital Costs Average Capital Cost Per Unit Elementary Middle School High School School Student Student Student Total Student Generation Generation Generation Generation 19 10 11 40 13 7 7 27 13 6 7 26 0 0 0 0 45 23 25 93 Capital Costs Elementary School Cost (2014-19 CIP + one 3% inflation factor) $24,179,250 850 $28,446 45 S 1,280,000 Middle School Cost (2015-20 CIP) $49,500,000 940 $52,660 23 S 1,211,000 High School Cost (2015-20 CIP) $70,000,000 1,250 $56,000 25 S 1,400,000 Total Capital Costs 53,891,000 $12,970 is n Annual Operational Costs (This Development's Impact on FCPS Operational Costs Average Annual Operational Cost Per Unit FY 2015 Budgeted Cost Per Student (FY2015 Budget) $1 1,269 School Facility Information Total Student Annual Generation Impact 93 S1,048,000 S3,493 Elementary School (Grades Middle School High School K-5) (Grades 6-8) (Grades 9-12) 2014-15 School Attendance Zone" Evendale Admiral Byrd Millbrook September 15, 2014 Student Enrollment 535 901 1,301 2014-15 Program Capacity 680 850 1,250 - School Attendance Zones are subject to change. # - Using applicant's assumptions regarding number of housing units. 11 0 • a COUNTY of FREDERICK Dcpartment of'Planning and Dcvelopment 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 February 23, 2015 Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Freedom Manor Rezoning; PIN # 64-A-23, 64-A-20, 64-A-19 Dear Patrick: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. Furthermore, the majority of this property was previously rezoned in 2005. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the property nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify a core battlefield within this area. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/pd cc: Shen -Valley Land Holdings LLC, 1835 Valley Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchcstcr, Virginia 22601-5000 Rezoning Comments Frederick -Winchester Service Authority Mail to: Fred -Wine Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, 1 xectitive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 722-3579 Hand deliver to: Fred-NVinc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Fred -Wine Service Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicants Name: Pennoni Associates c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Telephone: 540-667-2139 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: East and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet north/west of the signalized inter- section of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road Current zoning: RA & RP Zoning requested: RP JAN 1 5 2015 Acreage: 47.5415 Fred-Winc Service Authority's Comments: daru t �ae3► �t idWA wkidr+ hnWrA"# ;0,6 o f watt r*ZftV& W4A& WjC r flow.? Aq"e�q iC wat 1#6 op,� Fred -Wine Service Au rity's Signature & Date: uw ' Notice to Fred-Winc Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant 33 • Rezonin2 Comments Freedom Manor Frederick County Department of Inspections Mail to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections Co. Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Pennoni Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 c/o Patrick Sowers Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The Property is located East and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644) approximately 2,300 feet northwest of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road. Current Zoning: RP/RA Zoning Requested: RP Acreage: 47.54 t of Inspections Comments: Inspections Signature & ]date:_ ��� 10 Notice to I)cl)t. of Inspections — Return This Form to the Applicant 0 10 II. IMPACT ANALYSIS APPENDIX A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................12 A) CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE............................................................................................................ 12 B) STUDY OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................................................... 13 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION..........................................................................................................16 A) EXISTING ROADWAYS................................................................................................................................16 B) FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................................................. 16 C) CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES........................................................................................................................ 16 4. ANALYSIS OF 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................20 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES................................................................................................... 20 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................22 4. ANALYSIS OF 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................25 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH.................................................................................................................................... 25 B) APPROVED / UNBUILT BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS.................................................................................... 25 C) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................30 D) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................30 S. SITE TRIP GENERATION.....................................................................................................................35 6. 2020 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS (PHASE 1)......................................37 7. ANALYSIS OF 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................40 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................40 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSES...............................................................................................40 S. ANALYSIS OF 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................46 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH....................................................................................................................................46 B) APPROVED / UNBUILT BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................46 C) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................46 D) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................46 9. ANALYSIS OF 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................54 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................54 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSES...............................................................................................61 10. TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS......................................................................................................66 11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................71 0 LIST OF FIGURES 1'ignr l: Site Loiuliorl................................................................................................................................................................... 2 t'igmr _': Sile Purrelr..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1 'iglnr _'; 9: General Deuelormenl Plan.......................................................................................................................................... 4 1 'vgure 3: Slncly A n>a Roadmups.................................................................................................................................................... G 1'igmr 3A: Reno✓invended Imprnuemelils...................................................................................................................................... l I \"earl))' Uses................................................................................................................................................................. 14 lvglur -1/1: Easlern Firde irk, Coltgy Long- 1 el'm t 11nd Use Plan ............................................................................................. 15 Fignn' 3: 2030 1'rrde,ick, Colmdy Comrrrhen he T ralu)ro lalion Plan (Roar/ Clasrilimlioll)...................................................... 18 t'igun, (: 2030 ( mloick- Counlp Compahellsim, Tranrpo✓lalion Plan (Roar/ 0-oss Serlion)...................................................... 19 1"i we 7: 201-/ E.tisling TruOie 1-'obunes................................................................................................................................... 21 g nr d: 201-1 L' islirig 'I,z pii Condilions................................................................................................................................. 24 l' gu,r 9. 2020 Barkg,nnnd Gronc/h Tra(lir 1 'olnmes................................................................................................................. 27 1' gmr 10: 2020 BaoCglviind Delrelormenl T,u(%icllss gnme„lr..................................................................................................29 F gmr 11: 2020 Background T ra(Jir 1"oblmes............................................................................................................................ 33 f'iglar 12: 2020 Background Ta,Oic Cortdilio✓u.......................................................................................................................... 34 1vglur 13:20203ile(11hase I) lra(licDlsll7bllllolls..................................................................................................................38 (vgmr 11: 20 20 Sile (Phase l) 7 ruOir �I ssignmeuls................................................................................................................... 39 Fig,ur 15: 2020 Tolal7 rzl(Jir 1, obuner...................................................................................................................................... 44 Fig,ur 16: 2020 Toted "l raOic• C ondilions.................................................................................................................................... 45 17 gnlr l 7: 202G Backgron,ld Grow1b Trr1Oic l "olnm es............................................................................................................... 49 1'lgun' IS: 20_26' Background DePelopmenl 11'!I(%!r Assi ilmenis.................................................................................................. 50 Pigmy 19: 2026 Background 7ra(gir l'ofumes............................................................................................................................ 51 I'igmr 20: 2026 Background T r�lOir Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 53 1 igmr 21: 2026 Background Developlven/ T ia(lic /lssigmneuls nc/ Inleiparrel Conner/ion......................................................... 56 Figmr 22: 2026 Backgivund TraOir i "olnmes wl Inlerlmral Conner/ron................................................................................... 57 Fignrr 23: 2026.Vile (Build-Onl) T ra(lir lNoihnlious............................................................................................................... 58 1`�gnrr 24: 2026 .Vile (Buil(I-Onl) '1 raOirllssigmnenls................................................................................................................ 59 1'igu,r 25 202( Tolal T iaOic• P" bil 's...................................................................................................................................... 60 F glur 26: 2026' Told T,z1(lirCornlilionr.................................................................................................................................... 65 LIST OF TABLES TABI.I•: 1• PROPOSED LAND Ust; DI:Nsrrns...................................................................................................................... 12 T.\RI,I•: 2: 2013 1' \ISI'IN(; LOS, DI{L.\Y & 1300 (95%'['II.[:) lUsum's........................................................................... 23 T.\R1.1•' 3: FIIti I'ORu:,\L'I'RArrIC Gltmvri I.......................................................................................................................... 26 T,wi.1•: 4: (71'I i rit — TRI I' Gr,N 1 at.\'1'u )N............................................................................................... 28 T.\m.I•:5: 202013ACK(W NI) LOS, DI•:1..\1' & 1300 (95%TII.I•:) 1USUTA's..................................................................32 T.\RI.1•: G: Srn::1•RI) GI•:NI•:It:\'I'ION.......................................................................................................................................36 T.\Ru: 7: 2020 •I•( )'rm. LOS, DI:L.\Y & 1300 (950/'0TIl,1•;) RESULTS ................................................................................. 43 T.\RI.1•: 8: 2026 13ACIC6ROUND LOS, DI•:I.,\1' & 1300 (95°/; I*II.F) RESULTS...................................................................52 T.\ISI,1:: 9: SrrI•: TRII) GI•:NI:.It,\'I'I()N....................................................................................................................................... 55 1•.\ISI.1•: 9:A: tiI'I'I•: I\II).\(:,r .\'I' I':\1'I:It\III.I. R().\1).................................................................................................................. 62 1•.Uu,v 10: 2026TOTAL LOS, DI•:LAY & 1300 (95(!io1'II.I:) RI:SUI:I:S.............................................................................. 64 TABIA:: 1 l: RI(;I IT -TURN LANH \\ .\RR.\�'1' :\�.\I.1'sls .\'I' SI'1'r•. I!.NTRAN(:I•: (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) ............... 67 T.\1 u:: 12: RI(;I IT -TURN L\NI . \\ .\RR.\N'I' .1\.\L1'SIS ,\'I' SI'1'I'; I:N'I'It,\N(:1•; (2026TOTAL (,ONI)1'1'1( )NS)............... 68 Tmiu-, 13: 1.1:1-T- TURN LA N ItIZAN'I' .\NAINSIS .\'I' SI'I'I•: EN'I'RANCk (2020 TO'I AL CON nITR)NS).................. 69 T.\m.I•: 14: 1,1?I- I' TURN LAN I{ \\'.\RR.\N'I' .\\.\I.l'SIS .\'I' SI'I'I•: I sN,rIt,\NCI( (2026T )'I'AL (,ONI)1'1'I( )NS).................. 70 APPENDICIES \I'PIiNDIt .\: SCOPING DOCUMENTS :AP11I-,NDI1 13: "1*IZ:\FF1C COUNTS APPI_ADIX C: 2014 HMSI•ING CONDITIONS — SYNCIIRO 8 WORKSI II?1'I'S :APPI3NDIZ D: BACKGROUND D1;A'I{LUP\(1?N 1' DISI'RI13U PIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS.AAPPENDIX H: 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS — SYNCI IRO 8 WORKSFII F.TS .APPLNDIN F: 2020 TOT AL CONDITIONS — SYNCI IRO 8 & SIDRA WORKS1II.1 1'S :APPIHNDIN G: 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS — SYNCI IRO 8 WORKSI fEI:'l'S :\PPI:NDI\ 11: 2026 TOT AL CONDITIONS — SYNCI IRO 8 & SIDR.A WORKSI11':1'S Contact Information The analysis was prepared by Pennoni Associates Inc. : Mr. Ronald Mislowsky, P.E. Mr. Patrick Sowers, P.E. Mr. Douglas R. Kennedy, P.E. Mr. Wan Chong, E.I.T. Mr. Graham P. Young, E.I.T. Pennoni Associates Inc. 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 Herndon, Virginia 20171 (703) 449-6700 Sl/7 671 Tpi O boo C> 7)9 S22 Ibbl b72 O 679 761 761 6111 SO b61 Middletown i62T� r-, b: s`l bll i /Winchester D SITE City lTT7i 40 lbw) 6"d r2ss • Sky Mefidows State Pjrk vata ,ourcr; k,lMlL:ic 'Iap 3; FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 1 • ' IIt.\VFK IM VACTSTI Ul SITE LOCATION FREDERICK COUNTY. VA ,L. �40 t i Madison Village ` Connection at Madison Village r ■ ■ • 1 0 ■ G, N . N ■ A6etaood Drive ■ 1 Proposed�- r Entrance LEGEND =�__� ♦� Site ❑Project (47.5 Ac) A Ex. Freedom Manor G ��. ^ �� Shenandoah Memorial Park (26.9 Ac) Ex. RP Zone (7.1 Ac) Ex. RA Zoning Existing (13.5 Ac) Signal FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 2 1 H( ,,,,,,, , I'll ,,, SITE PARCELS nnut r4W FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Iug.,12015 E U A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 This traffic study analyzed the study area intersections for the weekday AM and PM peak 110U1'S for 2014 existing conditions, 2020 conditions with and Without the proposed development, and 2026 conditions With and Without the proposed development. Design years are intended to allow for market absorption and general growth in the vicinity. F►nal build -out year will vary. As shown in Figure 3, the study intersections are: I. Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Propose(!: Roundabout) 2. Madison Village internal intersection (Proposed: Rounclubolif 3. Madison Village Entrance & Route 522 (Proposed: Signcrlize(ll) 4. Route 522 & Papermill Road (Existing: Signalized) 5. Route 522 & Justes Drive (Existing: Signalized) General growth of 1.5% per year was added to the CXIStiIIg VOILImes and Othcr backgl'OU►ld developments in the vicinity of the site were entered into the assignments to assess future conditions as well. Freedom Manor site traffic distributions were referred from the original approved TIA submitted for the rezoning application. The study intersections were analyzed for Level-Of=Service (LOS), queue lengths, and delay for 2014 existing conditions, and 2020 and 2026 fLltw-C Conditions, with and WIthOLIt anticipated site traffic. Turn -lane warrants at the site entrance on Papermill Road were also reviewed and documented. Based on comparisons of 2005 and 2013 traffic counts fi•onl previous studies, VDOT requested new counts for the Route 522 & Papermill Road signal to better assess existing conditions. This analysis was included in the base year conditions. Based on the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed subject development and the evaluation of 2014 existing conditions, 2020 background conditions, 2020 total conditions, 2026 background conditions, and 2026 total conditions, it Was fOUnd that the surrounding roadway network can adequately accommodate the proposed site densities. The conclusions and recommendations are Summarized as follows: a) Trip Generation The proposed development WOUld be built in two phases. Phase I is planned for initial site access for the single -('amity residential conlnlunity with access to Papermill Road and Would generate 1,050 daily trips, 80 trips during the AM peak how, and 91 trips during the PM peak hour. Build -out of the project with access to Madison Village is projected to generate a total of 2,643 daily trips, 206 trips during the AM peak hour, and 249 trips during the PM peak hour. Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 5 Pennoni 0 • 191 0 �i erg (6 5 c o sn c� lc�VC O y= 1 � 1 it 1 r0 ,n 1 11 Approximate Site 1 Boundary c 1' szz n SITE 7 ass SITE s�) I - — ----- — sz� LEGEND Ol STUDY INTERSECTIONS j PROPOSED ROADWAY i Shenandoah yo Memorial Park � T O A O Winchester Airport y'd BG�r Kohl's Distribution Cenrr l� cf 9G� Pr A 1. E vet, Elemeritary Schul IV Admiral Richard E Byrd Mddle Schn(-- Uata source: t.00kte Nraps -m FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 3 All, 1 C %i I it %m %4 T Ci t I )) STUDY AREA FREDERICK COLiNTY. VA • 0 71adison I — 3 e -( y`` Y �, :F1`�' �u-ance � \ --I \ I Connect to \ j Madison Village l (Long -Tenn) ri I , SITF i l j InteT!�cLlIII- - Approximate Site Boundary I I L---- t)n-Site —� I I I I I I SITE I I I I I I I I Site Entrance I I E � a 01 STUDY INTERSECTIONS UP LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT — — — FUTUREROADWAY LEGEND Roaa e° I Design Concept I single lane I roundabout 140 ft I inscribed circle off -set to northeast. I `-----------I 4 IMPROVEMENTS: BY FREEDOM MANOR 178 BY MADISON VILLAGE FOR CONSIDERATION, --i BY OTHERS w aN d Papennill Road a (Route644)� � I I Extend EBR j j I storage I ------ I from 35 ft to I r--- I I 2SI 3_ft_--I I I I New five section signal head and rewiring to incorporate an overlap I I phase for the eastbound right tt turn. �____II Adjust center I ----------- I turn lane I r---------� storage: I lustes Drive 1 -125 ftNB and -175 ft SR! O I I I 1 I I I Justes Drive o ^r Is; 3 O r I.T. FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 3A I101-1-ICIMPACTSTUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FREDERICK COUNTY, VA r.'n A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Intersections Pcilmi-mill Rowl (Route 644) & Site Enircnnce This UllSignali7_ed intersection is proposed to be built as a roundabout With Phase 1 of the project for primary site access. Phase 2 of the project would introduce Madison Village trips as well with the proposed interparcel connection. The intersection as a roundabout Will operate at acceptable overall LOS "B" under both Phase I and Phase 2 conditions, with approach LOS at "C" or better conditions. Without a roundabout, the westbound appl'OaCh out Of the site during the 2026 PM peak how• is projected to operate at LOS "E" primarily, due to the high thrOLlgh VOIU111CS on Papermill Road. There were no projected queueing issues. Signalization is not anticipated to be warranted at the site entrance. Without a roundabout, a SOLlthbOLlnd PapCrmill Road left-tUl'tl lane and a northbound Papermill Road right -turn taper would be warranted with 2020 total PM peak hour volumes. The left -turn lane WOUld be warranted with both AM and PM peak hour vOlunlCs under 2026 peak hour volumes. In addition, the 2026 PM peak hour volume WOUld meet the warrant for a full - width right-Ull'n latle. BecaLlse a left IU1'11 lane WOUld regUil-e SUbstantial transition lane distance oil the northbOund Papermill Rd approach that WOUld encroach oil the off -site properties, Pennoni has engaged several iterations Of alternatives inClUding reviewing minimum lCft tL11-11 warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication WOUld be available. As noted in previous nleetingS With VDOT, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) WOUld not Support partial dedications or casements to allow the Papermill Road widening to be shared between the property Owners at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit the turn lane improvements along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even an option With a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported by the adjacent property owner's representatives. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to Support all Initial 1'OUndabOLlt With a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed DHOL1404 Page 7 Pennoni • • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 design accommodates the project VOILIMCS With the full build -out Of' Freedom Manor, so additional Will lanes not proposed with this revision. illInclison Village Entrance Roycl & Madison Village Commercial Sit -eels This proposed roundabout, to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "A" for all peak hours and analysis years. The roundabout was modeled as single -lane, with single -lane approaches and an inscribed diameter OI 110 ft. Since this was all internal intersection oft=site to Freedom Manor, the LOS is based on the FICM methodology as used in the Madison Village Traffic Study, but updated with revised traffic volumes with Freedom Manor. illladison Village Entrance Road & Roarle 522 (Front Royal Pike) This proposed signalized intersection, also to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perlorm at overall LOS "B" for all peak hours and analysis years with approach LOS "D" or better. There were no projected queueing issues with the Will lane storage lengths suggested in this TIA. Roane 522 (Front Roycrl Pike) & Pahermill Road This signalized intersection currently Operates at overall LOS "B" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the ['M peak hour. During the ['M peak hour, the eastbound [ apermill Road approach operates at LOS "D". Under 2020 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach WOuld deteriorate to LOS "L" during the PM peak hour With Overall intersection LOS "D". Under 2026 background conditions WithOLlt the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate further to LOS 'T" during the PM peak hour' with overall intersection LOS "C". Under 2020 total conditions with the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach will operate at LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D" without improvements. Under 2026 total PM conditions, the overall intersection LOS WOuld be an "L". DHOL1404 Page 8 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 To alleviate the undesirable LOS without the site and address eastbound and northbOLInd queueing during the future analysis years, the following improvements are recommended, regardless Of the subject site rezoning: I. Lengthen the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn pocket, currently about 35 ft, to 325 11. Due to the short existing turn lane, the LOS was shown without a separate turn lane in the revised analysis. 2. Incorporate an castbOLInd right -turn overlap phase to I -Lin COI1CL►I'i'C11tly With the northbOLInd ROLIte 522 left -turn phase into the signal timing. 3. Lengthen northbOLInd ROLIte 522 northbOLInd left-tUrn pocket by reslriping the center lane on ROLIte 522, Currently about 300 ft, to 425 ft. With these recommended improvements, the overall intersection LOS would improve to "C" or better and the right -turn storage would be sufficient for 95t11 percentile queues for the critical 2026 PM peak 11OLIrS. Approach LOS would also improve to LOS "D" or better. Site impacts are negligible at the signal, at 2.7 percent of the intersection's total hourly traffic volume in the 2020 PM peak hour and 4.5 percent in the 2026 PM peak hour, with the PM peak hour being considered because it was worse than the ANI peak hour. So off -site right Will lane (COI1StrLIctlO11) is not recommended with site development. The site is providing Papermill Road improvements at its entrance. Rothe 522 (Front Royal Pike) ct Jusles Drive This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "A" in both peak hours, with all approach LOS at "B" or better. It will operate at overall LOS "B" under 2020 and 2026 background as well as total conditions. All the approaches will operate at LOS "D" or better. There were no observed queueing issues for any of the analysis years. C) Final Assessment: The proposed site densities can be adequately accommodated by the Surrounding roadway network with a roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road as shown in Figure 3A. Off -site mitigations that could be considered by the County with Or without the site are: DHOL1404 Page 9 Pennoni E A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Lengthening of the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn lane at its intersection with Route 522 from the existing 35 ft to 325 Ft. 2. At the same intersection, Incorporating an eastbound right -turn overlap signal phase to run conctu-rcntly with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase. DHOL1404 Page 10 Pennoni 0 9 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 2. INTRODUCTION Pennoni Associates Inc. has prepared this report to present the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed development of "Freedom Manor" in Frederick County, VA. As shown in Figure 1, the subject 47.5 acre site is located southeast of Winchester, VA, between I-81, Papermill Road (Route 644), and Route 522 (Front Royal Pike). The analysis was based oil the requirements of Frederick County and the Virginia Department of'Transportation (VDOT). A scoping agreement is included in Appendix A. a) Current and Proposed Land Use Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PI-IR+A) submitted a traffic memo for the subject parcel Oil July 22, 2004 in support of'a rezoning, and was approved for 70 single-family detached residential units in the site's southern 26.9 acres parcel and two site access locations, one Oil Route 522 and the other on Papermill Drive. As shown in Figure 2, this project proposes an expansion to utilize the site's northern parcels for an overall site density of 100 single-family detached residential units and a mix of 200 townhomes and apartments. Two site access points are proposed, one on Papermill Road and the other on Route 522 via an interparcel connection with the approved Madison Village development to the north. A roadway connection between the Freedom Manor development and Westwood Drive is not proposed. Also, a roadway stub is proposed to be constructed for a possible future interparcel connection to the west of the site, as shown approximately on Figure 3. The project is planned to be constructed in two phases. Phase I would consist of the 100 single-family detached residential units and Phase 2 would consist of 200 townhomes and apartments. Accordingly, two analysis years, 2020 for Phase I and 2026 for Phase 2 were analyzed in this report. The interparcel connection with Madison Village was assumed for 2026 only. The proposed site densities are summarized in Table 1 below. TABLE 1: PROPOSED LAND USE DENSI' US DHOL1404 Page 12 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 As shown on Figure 2 and Figure 4, the site's north parcel is zoned RA (RL11-al Area District) and the remaining three parcels to the south are zoned RP (Residential, Performance District) on the Frederick County websitc's "Planning Access Terminal" map (accessed October 23, 2014). The comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is shown in Figure 4A with the area north of' Papermill Road planned in the "Eastern Frederick County Long -Term Land Use Plan" as residential to the south and high density residential to the north. Adjacent to the site, the plan shows residential to the east and high density residential to the northwest. The Sllcnandoah Memorial Park and the properties south of Papermill Road are planned for park uses. At build -out (2026), the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,643 daily trips and 206 and 249 trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. b) Study Objective This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has the following objectives: - Forecast future trips generated by the proposed development, - Analyze and docLnnent the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding road network, and - Identify mitigation options, if needed. Pennom coordinated with the developer, VDO"f staff, and Frederick County staff in August and September of 2014 to define the scope of the traffic study as shown in Appendix A. The proposed development -generated average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed the 5,000 vehicle threshold for a "Chapter 527" submission. I-lowcver, Pennon) prepared this report in accordance with "Chapter 527" gU►del►ncs contained in § 15.2-2222. 1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24 VAC 30-155), for submittal to Frederick County, VA, and VDOT Staunton District planning staff. Approximate Site Boundary Pennoni 47 LNM 1%& L .1 � 184=7 a L Old , Kffft Vow --- 4 I Jusles Drive md I r :Approximate Site BoundarN i SIII If } L r� iy A4 l i J Long Range Land Use Plan ftt 37 Hypa++ UrOan Dr.Mopn«+Area Sanwr and Wabr Sa.v.0 Ana Arporl s..vp«t Area ® LArdWl Support Ar.a Buwrr.t WM-lAv QWM Uw Cwrnrrcul p1Ace /bury l.ormwcul Q B2 83 ® blMwlnal +A� WxaMv+a ® /feavy Mu�buJ ® Gra.a u.. �w.,sb.x on.r QEnractm Y.rQ w+.o.ntw • Plarv+.0 UM Devebpnrnt Wad Uw Age R.1b—E Urban 1 MM IIa.glLartnod Vllapa WvO.nbal � ua © 16�Oan+Ar FL WnrW 6 va OMgpO.ncM Wvew.bx 1716 ua QIhaM Uw Mpf.Ihntfy RwtrrtlW 12-I6 �aa Ru x Ar.a OConr/nercul Racreabn QR.cr.x.on /late al Rasouus ♦ Rwax,on r► Pb ® [nwron mbntNl� Senubve Arwf ® trrrslx. R.,tt.. • NYptc � DSA MWbonal School F.. t Ra+ta.a _� Rurx Can -.My Canby ,PArr 2030 Comprehensive policy plan Map Approved: July 14th, 2011 Amended: June 13t1, 2012 -- FREEDOM MANOR EASTERN FREDERICK COUNTY FIGURE 4A " • TRAFFIC IMPACTSTUDY LONG TERM LAND USE PLAN FREDERIp( C011J11TY. VA 0 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION a) Existing Roadways Route 522 (Front Royal Pike): In the site vicinity, Route 522 diverges form US 50 (Millwood Pike) east of the I-81 intersection and connects the City of Winchester to the north with I-66 and the City of Front Royal to the south, traversing a distance of approximately 15 miles, mostly through rural areas. North of Papermill Road, Route 522 carries the VDOT classification Of urban minor arterial. South of Papermill Road, VDOT classifies it as a rural minor arterial. It is a 4-lane roadway with a two-way left -turn lane (TWLTL) from US 50 to %2 mile south of Papermill Road where it becomes 4-lane median - divided. VDOT estimates the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to be 14,000 vehicles north Of Papermill Road and 16,000 vehicles south of Papermill Road. The speed limit is 55 mph in the vicinity Of the study area. Papermill Road (Route 644): Papermill Road is an approximately 1.5 mile roadway that starts within the City of Winchester and continues in a southeasterly direction ending at Route 522. It is 2-lane undivided and considered an urban minor collector by VDOT. Papermill Road carried an ADT of 7,600 vehicles in 2014 according to VDOT estimates. The speed limit in the study area is 45 nlph. b) Future Transportation Improvements The 2030 Eastern Frederick COL111ty COMprehensive Transportation Plans are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 in terns of road classification and cross section, respectively. The Plans show Papermill Road is envisioned to become 4-lane divided corridor. Papermill Road's intersection with ROLIte 522 is also shown to be shifted to the South to align with Justes Drive, with Papermill Road continuing past Route 522 to US 50 (Millwood Pike) east of the future Route 37 Bypass. However, no programmed improvements were identified at the scoping session, and accordingly, no future regional transportation improvements were assumed in the analysis. c) Construction Estimates For planning budget purposes using the VDOT 2009 Planning and Mobility estimates (inflated at 3 percent annually to 2018), the proposed and suggested improvements could be budgeted as noted: - Roundabout construction at site entrance, estimated at $1,300,000 plus $200,000 for rcallgning approximately 180 ft Of the SOLlthbOund Papermill Road approach to the roundabout. - $1,014,500 for the main on -site roadway as a two-lane local street fl•on Papermill Road to the interparccl connection to Madison Village. DHOL1404 Page 16 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Additional off -site improvements suggested to improve existing, background, and total operations: - Extend eastbound Papermill Road fight t111.11 lane from 35 11 to 325 ft with 100 ft taper, including utility and R-O-W contingencies at 25% percent Of the lane cost. This would equate to $925,000. - Modification of the existing traffic signal operations at Route 522 & Papermill Road to add an eastbound right turn overlap phase, estimated at $5,000 for a 5-section signal head on castbOUnd approach, related rewiring, and aSSUrniI1g 110 StRICtUral Upgrades of the northeast gUadrant traffic signal pole. - Restriping of the northbOUnd left tL11-11 lane between Papermill Road and Justes Drive to increase left turn storage, estimated at $7,000. These estimates are preliminary and are for general comparisons only, are based on projected 2018 VDOT cost estimates for planning, and not based on final engineering plans for Frederick County or VDOT approval. d) Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities There are no existing pedestrian features along the arterial and collectors. However, with the subdivision improvements in the Urban area, sidewalks are proposed. There is currently no bus/transit service outside of Winchester City limits (Win Tran). Papermill Road is designated for a potential future bicycle facility per the Winchester, Frederick County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. A 10' nlulti-use trail is proffered across the property's Papermill Road frontage, as part of the site improvements. DHOL1404 Page 17 Pennoni • • Eastern Frederic County •... Plan- la T I r _ ait � \w�9-\• F I � v I � r I Eastern Road Plan -Ian 2011 SITEI ��/ Improvad Malw Artana, ---►F. \ /" 1 • e - a «. New Mmw Art ... I Improved Mmw An. — New Major CW.W.r �- _ Improved M.w wwtw I New Mmw Cdlectw Imp—d Muni COP 1 IN-0 Ramp Rt J1 BvP-1 lMO.n D.v.lo.m.nt A..a .n wer d w.tar ServKe Area 7 RYr.Konn+UmtyCMfer �('�f� w reo..a M Y FREEDOM MANOR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE FIGURE 5 • - . ! H \1 F k 1"11\I l M TRANSPORTATION PLAN D1100404 FREDER" COUJTY. YA (ROAD CLASSIFICATION) fugu,1201t CJ u FREEDOM MANOR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE FIGURE 6 IKAi-FIt IMPIA I NIl0) TRANSPORTATION PLAN 0110L,404 FREDERICK COLJNT,,. (ROAD CROSS SECTIONS) „zas A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 4. ANALYSIS OF 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Pennoni conducted weekday peak period manual U11.11ing i-novement traffic counts On Wednesday, October I, 2014 front 6 AM to 9 AM and 4 PM to 7 PM at the Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road (Route 644) intersection. Based on the Willing nlovenlents, the weekday AM peak hour was identified to start at 7:15 AM and the PM peak hour peak hour was identified to start at 4:30 PM. The traffic counts are included in Appendix B of this report from Quality Counts, and the AM and PM peak hots- volumes are shown graphically on Figure 7. The Route 522 & Justes Drive intersection turning nlovcnlent volumes were derived from a COlnparlson Of the 2014 COUnts at ROUte 522 & Papermill Road (by 11cI1noni) and 2005 Counts at ROIIte 522 & Papermill Road and Route 522 & JUstcs Drive (by VETTRA for the Frederick County Elementary School TIA, June 9, 2005). Based on the Observation that the counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road are constant (they actually show a slight decrease) between 2005 and 2014, it was assumed that if' the inbound and outbound volumes On Justes Drive to/fronl ROUte 522 were Counted today, they would be similar to the 2005 VETTRA Counts at that intersection (plus non -school -peak elementary school trips to/from Evandale Elementary, built after 2005). The VETTRA counts are also included in Appendix B of this report. The 2013 VETTRA warrant study for Justes Drive only provided AM and PM school peaks. 2014 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) roadway link volumes were calculated based on PM peak hour volumes and a "k" factor of 0.84 and 0.93 for ROLItc 522, north and south Of Papermill Road, respectively, and 0.096 for Papermill Road. The "k" factors were taken front VDOT's 2013 Average Daily Traffic VOILH-ne Estimates data and peak hour volumes. Consequently, the ADT on Route 522 was estinlatcd at 16,430 vehicles daily north of Papen-nill Road and 18,680 vehicles daily south of Papermill Road. The ADT on Papermill Road was estimated to be 8,810 vehicles daily. DHOL1404 Page 20 Pennoni • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Peak I1OL11- factors and heavy veI11cle percentages were CalCUlated based oil the traf f Ic COLIntS at the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for 2014 existing conditions. Signal timing data, based on field observations, were also entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for Route 522's intersections with Papermill Road and With Justes Drive. Table 2 and Figure 8 show the 2014 existing lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of' Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (FICM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "D" during the PNI peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during both peak hours. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D" while the Route 522 northbOUnd and SOUthbOUnd approaches Operate at LOS "B" and "C", respectively. FICNI analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 11 taper). But it isn't a fully single lane approach either bccaLISC sornc fight tL11.11 vehicles are able to utilize the right Will storage lane, however short, to make right tills On red. Because this is an "in-between" situation, FICM analysis skews the results to be better than actual if analyzed as 2 lanes and worse than actual if analyzed as a single lane approach. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background, and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. For the PM peak, the LOS "D" equates to a 400 ft queue On the approach. HCM 2000 methodology was Utilized for this analysis because FICM 2010 CO111pUtation does not support the lane geonlet-y. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "A" during the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "B" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2014 existing conditions are included in Appendix C of this report. DHOL1404 Page 22 Pennoni ! 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 2: 2013 EXISTING LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%'I'ILE) RESULT'S Intenectlon •I.I-01-1c Colliml I:ulc GI1nq> :�IllllilaCll Ex is ling/ Illlll-lalle 2 lengths(in (feet) AM I'cak Iloqkof I'M Peak (lour .DS , Delay! sec) ,Back I)l'I;1)' (ill sec) of J Quelle (in feet) 4 Rogue 523 C Papemull Road Siuullin:d f[3'LR C 24.6 130 D 44.0 400 EB LOS - C 24.6 - 1) 44.0 - N'B 1- 300 A 8.0 51 C 28.9 161 N [3'f A 6.5 68 13 14.7 134 N[3�1' - \ 13 LOS - A 7,11 - 13 189 - S 13'r 13 19.7 I I S C 32.8 250 SWIR S 13 LOS 13 19.7 C 32.8 - Ovelall 13 13.9 C 30.9 - 5 RouleN13-1' >22 S. Justes Dme Sipalbcd `,V13'1- 225 13 18.0 -16 13 18.5 36 %V13'R 13 14.7 32 13 1 15.3 25 Wit LDS 13 15.7 - 13 16.4 - NB-h A 95 105 A 79 125 - N13 R 325 A 4.9 25 A •1.3 25 N 11 LDS - A 9.0 - A 7.7 - S13 1, 500 A 6.3 26 A 4.7 25 S1Ff A 33 35 A 3.6 94 SBT S13 LDS A 4.1 A 3.7 Overall A 1 7.7 A 6.0 (1) E13 = Eis1tvund, W13 Westbound, N13 = Northbound, S13 = SOlIdllxxaSd, L: Lcf),'I'i fhlu, R: Right (2) "funl-hne Icnelhs do not include taper. All values arc approximate. (3) LOS and Delay %alucs calcuhled with I ICM meiho&logy using Spnchro 8. (4) 9ith percentile Back of Queue values calcuh(ed usnlu Synchro 8 proprietary melluxlology. Minimum assumed to be 25 Iccl. DHOL1404 Page 23 Pennoni • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 4. ANALYSIS OF 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Background traffic volumes represent future traffic that WOUld travel through the study area intersections without the proposed Freedom Manor development. The background t'aff is vOltulleS were projected as Outlined below. a) Traffic Growth Table 3 shows the historical traffic growth trends along ROLIte 522 and along Papermill Road in the immediate vicinity of' the site using VDOT ADT data. The average yearly growth rates were determined using to be under I percent between 2002 and 2012. When 2001 data is introduced, the average yearly growth rate increases clue to a sudden increase between 2001 and 2002, which skews the results. Based on these observations, a conservative annual growth rate of 1.5 percent was agreed to in the scoping. The volumes grown at 1.5 percent alltltlally are shown Ill Figure 9. b) Approved / Unbuilt Background Developments To project the 2020 background traffic conditions, the following background developments and their respective TIA's were considered in the analysis: - Madison Village (TIA by Stowe Engineering, Rev. June 27, 2013) - Frederick County Fourth High School (TIA by VET fRA, December 16, 2013) The land use densities and distributions for each development were taken from the TIA's, as well as pass -by and internal trip percentages for the commercial portion of the Madison Village development. The Madison Village trips for residential include the blended VDOT Staunton District tOW11110USe/apartnicnt derived trip rate for non -single- family detached uses. Pass -by and internal t►'ipS WCI'C included per the previous study. Trip generation for the high school was updated with the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9`1' Edition) and for the PM peak hour of' the adjacent street. The high school TIA did not indicate the distribution split at the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection, so 15 percent of the 50 percent assigned northbound on Route 522 at Justes Drive were assumed to use Papermill Road. The background developments' trip generations are detailed in Table 4. Figure 10 shows the 2020 background development traffic assignments for the AM and PM peak hours. Individual background development distributions and assignments, as well as Madison Village Commercial's pass -by assignments are shown in Appendix D of this report (Figures DI-DS). NO Madison Village trips were Pouted tlll'Oligh the Freedom Manor site for the short-term scenario, to be conservative, asSUrnillg no illterpal'cel connection With ill►tial development. DHOL1404 Page 25 Pennoni 0 11 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor TABLE 3: HISTORICAL TRAFFIC GItowri-I VD01'-Il•af7ic Growth 'I'rcnd Front Royal Pike (Route 522) )—hauemn AA�... f—ice r-h.",h Rd P. Pnnnrmlll P-1 Revised August 12, 2015 YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effectivo Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 15.000 00% 00% -1 1% 07% 2011 15,000 -63% -16% -1 1% 23% 2010 16,000 00% 00% 1 1% 2009 16,000 6 7% 00% 1 1% 2008 15,000 -63 % 00% 1 2 % 2007 16.000 00% 1 6% 4 9% 2006 16.000 00% 3 4 % 2005 16,000 6 7 % 7 5 % 2004 15,000 00% 2003 15.000 7 1% 2002 14,000 16 7 % 2001 12.000 Average Growth Rate 12.2% 1.4% 1.0% 1.6% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.5% 0.2% u.7i Front Royal Pike (Route 522) t,.f ..n P—to rn R p—,,,in Rnar1 YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 14.000 00% 00% -1 1% 00% 2011 14.000 00% -3 3 % -1 1% 3 8% 2010 14. 000 00% -17% -1 1% 2009 14,000 00% -17% 00% 2008 14,000 -12 5% -1 7 % 00% 2007 16.000 67% 34% 89% 2006 15.000 00% 1 7 % 2005 15.000 00% 11 8 % 2004 15.000 7 1 % 2003 14.000 00% 2002 14,000 45 8 % 2001 9,600 Average Growth Rate 4.3% 1.1% 0.9% 1 1.9% w/o 2001 0.1% -0.5% -0.7% e.U7 Papermill Road (Route 644) between Route 522 & SCL Winchester YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 7.800 00% -1 5 % -2 5% 0 5% 2011 7,800 -60 % -5 1% -2 5% 2 2 % 2010 8.300 00% -23% 06% 2009 8.300 00% -23% 1 3% 2008 8.300 -13 5% 0 9% 1 9% 2007 9,600 5 5% 5 7% 7 3% 20D6 9.100 00% 5 3 % 2005 9,100 13 8 % 9 6 % 2004 8.000 3 9 % 2003 7,700 4 1% 2002 7.400 17 5 % 2001 6.300 Average Growth Rate 12.3% 1.3% 1.0% 1.3% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.175 -U.3"7. U.er SOURCE VDOT, Traffic Engineering Division, VDOTAwmge Daily Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates, Jurisdiction Report 34 DHOL1404 Page 26 Pennoni • 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 4: OTHER DEVELOPMENTS — TRIP GI NL'RA'I'ION Frederick County Fourth High School" 1LELmd0,(1) . 1.11 PE.IK!lU11!( P.11PEAK1/OUI7 PAIL[' JL�j [Imposed Densities (11 E.8th Edition Rates) IIIIASG: IIUII.D-OUT 53u <3u2w 1250 nod ltigh School YA 172 538 77 x6 163 2,071 TRIP RATE SOURCE Tnp Generation Manual (91h Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers{ 2010 (1) fTE Land Code shovn as the first 3 digits Decimal shov.n for Internal use by Pennon) for lookup table for trip rate variable (2) Land use and density as shovm in the T/A for the Fredeack County Fourth High School, by VETTRA. December 16, 2013) AM Prak Hnur PM Prak Hour Daily 1t//ecttvv trip PoJIe, (2-w•,Y) %Inlnmvl (2-w•,Y) slnlwund Weekday Ihgh School stud I1 1 6x"., o f IT'. 1 7 Madison Village'2' /!E L,nd 1%,(1) .Idl 11E.IK 1101/l7 PII PE.I K HOUR CODE! 0/)F )El \'.t'lI i' I'nr. ('.5'F �' W/ !1 :11. LK 01/l' !1 ' l L 1 Pmlmsed Densities (11 E 8th Edition Rates) 1'IL�SE: IIIIILU-OUT 220 220S11 .180 UL' Apanncm 19 M, 2.15 19-1 IUI 298 3.192 L,1 L,I Jw 128 Du To„nhouscIMM Slaunlon U,lncl l6lcl 1') 62 81 N" 39 10.1 1.0.13 2311 L,n'MII 32 DC I,a,housc 2 12 1.1 11 1. 17 186 '1'olal Residenlial Trips 70 270 340 271 148 419 4,421 826 126-1 107.000 ksr Spcclall, Road 351 3141 732 3111 216 537 4.742 '1-ot4il Development Trips 421 651 1,072 572 384 956 9,163 Internal Capture 39% 61% -5% 60% 40% -10% -15% R—&nual -7 -10 -17 •25 .17 -42 -711 Itclail -10 -7 -17 -17 -25 -'12 0 Dotal Residential 63 2W 323 246 131 377 3.710 Total Retail 1.11 374 715 231 211 495 .1.7.12 Total External Trips 404 634 1,038 530 342 872 8,452 .75 .si) -134 -1.186 Tolal Weekday'Yips o/ Reduction 316 539 855 r 455 283 738 7,266 TRIP RATE SOURCE Tnp Generation (91h Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2010 (1) RE Land Code shasn as the first 3 digits Decimal shorn for internal use by Pennoru for lookup table for tnp rate ,anable (2) Land use and density as shovm in the TIA for Madison Village by Stove Engineering, Rev June 27, 2013) AM Peak Hnur PM Pr,k Hour PAU h'IfecT'e trip !(tile, 2•wa t 1n� (2-w.,y) s lnlnnnd Weekday :lpann—I DU 05 2W. rib W., 67 Townho,isc I\TX)T Slauniun Dint Ralc1 DU 06 23^„ n x 0-" x I To„nhousc DU III Ill. u s 6v'„ s x Spcc,ah, Rcrail Ise 69 14'n su W. 113 DHOL1404 Page 28 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 c) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The 2020 background traffic VOlunlCS for the AM and PM peak hours, shown in Figure 11, were determined by adding the 2020 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 10, t0 the 2020 backgrOund growth traffic V01LII11CS, shown in Figure 9. d) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PI -IF (Peak I -lour Factor) of' 0.92 was used unless the existing PI -IF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 5 and Figure 12 show the anticipated 2020 background lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (I-ICM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout': single lane With 110 ft inscribed diameter) This I.OUlldabOUt Operates at Overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro was used in lieu of SIDRA as the TIS (Traffic Impact Study) for the development that the roundabout is located in (Madison Village TIS by Painter Lewis PLC, June 27, 2013) analyzed it with Synchro as well. In addition, the volumes are minimal and there are no operational issues identified with the LOS conditions, as all analysis years (both background and total) show Overall LOS "A" and approach LOS "I3" or better for both peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: With Will lanes I) This intersection operates at overall LOS "13" during both peak 11OUrS. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during both the AM and PM peak 11OLII'S. Intersection 94: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and will experience Overall LOS "D" during the PM peak hour, without the site and with the existing lane configuration. ' Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 30 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the PMpeak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach would deteriorate to LOS "E", while the Route 522 northbound and SOLIthbOLllld approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. 1-ICM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach Is not a fully 2-lane appi-oach With a minimal LBR stol'age lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). But it isn't a fully single lane approach either because some right turn vehicles are able to utilize the right turn storage lane, however short, to make right turns On red. Because this is an "in-between" Sitllation, FICM analysis skews the results to be better than actual if analyzed as 2 lanes and worse than actual if' analyzed as a single lane. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions WithOLlt the l-ight tu1'11 pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. As a single lane approach and optimized with a 110 second cycle length, the eastbound Papermill Drive queue increases with growth to approximately 750 ft during the PM peak 11OLIr. AM queues without the site arc at approximately 300 ft, Pennoni assumed right turns on red at appl'Oxilllately I vehicle per cycle. Extending a separate right turn lane oil Papermill Road to 325 ft and incorporating right turn overlap phasing for the eastbound right would improve approach LOS to a "C" in the AM and PM peak hours. FICM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure I I or Table 5 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix E, labeled as "2 Lane EB". The 95`l' percentile queue for the nOrthbol11ld ICft-tLlrn would exceed the existing storage length and the PM LOS is at "E". As mitigation for the 2020 background and the long-term 2026 background scenarios, lengthening the storage to 350 ft fi•onl 300 ft is reconinlended. The taper 1`61- the northbound Ielt is currently back-to- back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drivc. Therefore, restriping Would take 50 ft off the southbound Iclt storage at Justes Drive. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection Operates at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2020 background conditions are included in Appendix C of this report. DHOL1404 Page 31 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 201S TABLE 5: 2020 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95"WILE) RESULT'S H Intersection 1*l-affic C•ontrul I:ux (:nntlt/ t 1',xisling/ Pm lxls ed Uun-lane : lellg(ILx (fecu AI\I Prllc (lour PNI Peak flour 3 LOS � Delay (it] see) Back of cs Qucce (in feet) i LOS 3 Delay (in see) Back of c '1Appmacb QtKuc (in feet) 2 \tadison Vdl lee Iintruec l \lad \ill. ConnerculStreet Rotuxlabout 1:13 L iR A 9.9 50 A 6.2 25 [:It LDS A 9.9 - A 6.2 - Wit I: IR A 74 50 A 97 75 \1'13 LOS A 7.4 - A 9.7 - NBIA R A 93 25 A 5.8 25 \ 13 LOS A 9.3 - A 5.8 SBTIR A 6.8 25 A 7.0 25 sit u)S A 6.8 - A 7.0 - Overall A 8.3 - A 8.3 3 Roule 522 : \Iadison Vilb&e Entrance Sipalreed 1i1311. - C 32.5 221 D 53.0 205 1:11 R 250 C 29.0 48 D 509 55 lilt LOS - C 30.9 - 1) .52.0 - N131. 225 A 8.9 43 A 6.2 104 NBT - A 0.1 91 A 0.2 65 NBT N 13 LOS A 2.3 - :1 1.7 SI3T 13 1.1.6 190 A 9.2 239 S13T S13 R 275 13 140 45 A 9.0 43 SB LDS - 13 14.4 - A 9.1 - Ovelall 13 14.7 - 13 12.4 - •1 Rome 522 C Papemull Road Similmed ` G13'LR - 1) 49.9 298 li 71.9 753 1i13 LOS - 1) 49.9 - 11, 71.9 - N13,1. 350° C 23.7 130 li 68.3 305 N13'f A 6.3 20 13 14.7 115 N13T N 13 LOS 13 10.9 - C 28.8 SB f 13 19.1 283 D 46.1 486 SB •IR SB LDS I3 19.1 - 1) 46.1 - Overtll C 20.3 - 1) 46.1 5 Roule 522 & Jusics Dri%c Similind W13 L 225 C 29.0 115 D 49.9 115 W13'R - C 22.2 77 1) 462 51 Wil LOS C 24.9 - 1) 47.8 - N13 f B 12.1 198 A 6.3 192 N13T 1413 R 325 A 5.5 25 A 2.0 25 Nil LOS - 11 10.4 - A 6.0 SI31, 450 B 11.1 56 A 3.8 25 Sl3'h 13 12.7 45 A 0.1 71 SBT sit LOS 13 12.1 - A 0.5 - Ovetall 13 13.4 - A 7,0 - ( I ) E13 = Eastbound. %V[3 %Vestlxrund, N13 = Nonhlvilid, S13 - SoullIIXHlnd, I.: I.CII, TAIII I, R: Right (2) Tunl-brie lengths do not include taper. All values are approximate (3) LOS and Delay calucs calciihied kith I IC NI nielbalology using Synchro 8. (•I) Signalved ullersecllOn 95th percentile Back of Queue salucs calcuLlled using S)ncluo 8 propriel;uy mclhodology. Mininnim assumed to be 25 feel. (5) Roundabout 95th percentile Back of Queue N;dues calculated with I ICM ❑tclhodology using Synchro S. (6) Reirtping recommended DHOL1404 Page 32 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 5. SITE TRIP GENERATION The proposed Freedom Manor site -generated trips were calculated using traffic generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Tri/) Generation, 91h E( ition, 2012, as well as VDOT Staunton District requircmentS that require 80% of the trips for townhomes and apartments to be CalCUlated USlilg VDOT local rates. The project is planned to be built in two phases, with Phase 1 (2020) consisting of 100 single-family residential dwelling units and Phase 2 (2026) consisting of a nlix of 200 townhomes and apartment residential dwelling units. Table 6 shows the weekday Alva and PM peak hour and daily trips generated by the proposed project for the two phases, with the values used in the analysis boxed. The values outside the boxes are shown for comparison. DHOL1404 Page 35 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 6. 2020 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS (PHASE 1) The 2020 site traffic distribution and assignment percentages shown in Figure 13 are derived from the June 2005 TIA for the rezoning application and are as follows: 45% via Route 522 to the north, 35% via Route 522 to the south, and 20% via Papermill Road to the northwest. The 2020 phase I site assignments are shown in Figure 14 for the AM and PM peak hours. All site trips are projected to use the Papermill Road entrance in 2020, as the interparcel connection with Madison Village to the north Is Ilot aSSLInied to be open/collSlructed For initial access. DHOL1404 Page 37 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 7. ANALYSIS OF 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The proposed site -generated trips in 2020, shown on Figure 14 were added to the 2020 background traffic volumes, shown on Figure 12, to obtain 2020 total traffic volumes. Figure 15 shows the 2020 total traffic volumes at the study intersections for weekday AM and PM peak hours. b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analyses Per VDOT TIA preparation gllidelincs, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach 11I-117 (Peak I -lour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PI -IF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and Optimized using Synchro 8. Table 7 and Figure 16 show the anticipated 2020 total lane geometry, intersection traf f Ic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (I-ICM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8 and SIDRA for the proposed roundabout at the site entrance Oil Papermill Road, the following results were observed: Intersection #1: Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Unslgnalizcd: with separate outbound right -turn lane from Site Entrance for capacity purposes; proposed single -lane roundabout in recommendations) Witll0Llt a r01.1ndabOUt, this Intersection operates at overall LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and PM peak 11OLII's. The northbound Papermill Road approach does not meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane but does meet the threshold for a taper based Oil PM peak hour volumes. The southbound Papermill Road approach meets the warrant for a left - turn lane based on PM peak hour volumes. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance Oil the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach oil the off -site properties, Pennoni updated the access plan to support all initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in this revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates DHOL1404 Page 40 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable approach LOS "A" for the Afvl peak hour and at an LOS "B" for the PM peak hour. Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout: single lane with 110 ft inscribed diameter) The volumes at this roundabout do not change from 2020 background, and therefore, continues to operate at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and Pfvl peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) The intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at overall LOS "D" during the PM peak horn•. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the Pfvl peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "F" while the Route 522 northbound and Sorthbound approaches operate at LOS "D". As noted previously, the FICM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the CB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal CBR storage lane (35 (t with a 65 ft taper). This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. FICM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because FICM 2010 computation does [lot Support the lane geometry. For the total conditions, the PM queue with site traffic is increased by approximately 50 ft to 800 ft. AM queues increase to approximately 335 ft; but maintain the approach LOS "D" grade. The I'M LOS is at "F" conditions with a Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 41 Pennoni • • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 single lane. Overall LOS is at "D" conditions, which reflects the LOS letter grade for the 2020 background conditions. Extending a separate right turn lane on Papermill Road to 325 ft and incorpol-ating right turn overlap phasing for the Castb011nd right W011ld improve approach LOS to a "C" in the AM peak hour and "D" in the PM peak. I-ICM 2010 methodology was Utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. This alternative analysis Is not shown in Figure 16 or Table 7 but the Synchro worksheets arc included in Appendix F, labeled as "2 Lane E13". The 95°i percentile queue for the northbound ICft-turn Would exceed the existing storage length. To support the 2020 total and the long-term 2026 total scenarios, lengthening the northbound storage to 425 ft from 300 it is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to-back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefol-c, restriping WOuld take 125 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Although the lengths are different, lengthening the not-thbOUnd ICft-Wni lanes within the existing pavement Is recommended With or without the site. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "I3" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All appl-oaclics C0I1tillLIC to operate at LOS "C" or better. The Synchro 8 and SIDRA vvorksheets for 2020 Total conditions are included in Appendix F of this report. DHOL1404 Page 42 Pennoni 0 • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 7: 2020 TOTAL LOS. DELAY & BOO (951%; NLE) RESULTS 0 Intrl -fi.rl fl:lrllc CO 1.1 Ianc Olnup' 1 .\pplo:lfll Ehliow IhnpusrJ IlllIFI:IIM ] Irn>:Illc (fcrll AM P,-ak Mur I'.M 11rak Ilnur , I.()ti Dr111)' (in .crc) Wick of (211riM I- t (in frrO a I.DS a Dr1:1)' (in src) Itnck of (21M IM I.t (in frrQ 1 Pal'oull Road [ Sdc F"trance C1nwulvcJ WR1. c IS•l 25 D 267 25 %%IIH( IIIII II I15 25 Il 11 .1 II \\ It LOS C 17.0 C 23.6 NIVIR - A 1) 1) 0 A 00 0 NI{ LOS - A 11.11 .\ 0.0 S Il'I.1' A %.1 II A %5 1I A II II .\ 1111 SIII.OS Osrrall A 1.2 ,\ 0.7 1 P.11-7111[toad X Sae IJll wKe IMPROVED Stith a RoUldalwli WI31.R - A 66 25 A 61 25 %%Il LOS - A 6.6 - It 6.1 NIVIR A 86 70 A 92 %0 N11 LOS A %.6 A 9.2 SI11.I - A 7.1 13 I; 13.4 1.15 MILOS - .\ 7A Il 13.4 0'-ll - ,\ 8.0 - 11 11.4 - Vadwo \916gc E,nu xc Mad \'Ill C--cnl slreel [tOI1YdllTIl1 HILIR - A ')1) j 50 A 62 25 Ell LDS A 9.9 .\ 6.2 \PII I.IIt - A 7.1 50 A 9 7 75 \\ R LOS - ,\ 7.4 - ,\ 9.7 - is 25 Nil LOS ,\ 9.3 A 5.9 SIVI'I It A 6% 25 A 70 25 SII LOS ,\ 6.8 A 7.0 0sr1all - ,\ 8.3 A 8-3 3 Roote 522 & Mad.- Vdlayv 6ur:utcc sg"'Imd I:Ill. - C 32 5 221 1) 53 1 205 HIR 250 C 290 .19 D 511) 55 Eli LOS C 309 - I) 52.1 - Nil 1. 200 A %') 37 A 63 106 NIVI - A II 1 II.1 A 02 73 NR'I' Nil LOS 1% 2.3 A 1.7 -- SI111, IS 1.16 193 .\ 93 2.11) SIS'f - SI)It 275 It I.111 •15 A 'lU .13 sit LOS 11 14.5 A 9.2 Osrlall II I4.6 0 12.3 I Roue 5„ r 1'nlxm0l ItoaJ Slvulved 1:11'I.R - D 5.1.1 .331 f 862 796 Ell LOS - 1) 54.4 1, 96.2 - Nil 1. 125" C 31 ') 163 1' 832 316 NISI' A 7 7 25 11 1.15 Ill NISI - NIl LOS - 11 I4.2 - 1) 316 - Sl3'f (' 311 115 U 519 d86 SIVIlt sll LOS C 24.3 I) 51.9 Osrlall C 25.2 - D 53.% Rolle 522 )Iola Dmc Snalal-d \1'01. 22K C 290 115 D 500 115 \VB It - C 22 2 78 1) 162 52 \%It LOS C 2.19 1) 47.Y N IS'h 1) 122 201 A 6.1 197 N Il'I NI1'R 325 A 5 5 25 A 21) 25 11 10.4 ,\ 6.0 IE IS I_'9 25 :\ III 72 It 12.2 Osel:dl 11 13.4 ( I) lilt = Iasd,ound. WD Wc,1I-,1d, Nil N,,old-.0. S0 Soulhl-1.1, I. I.cll. I I hru, R 1001 121 Tumduw kncthc Jo not nchxlc talwr .\E labcs are appnnnlak• 13)LOS and Uclay lahwx caLulatcd w ah II('\I nsdrtlobti mmg S)nchm % SIURA uwd for nnuulalww al wlcnccpm d I (l) Scnalucd arlrrsccta 1 951h 1-1- lk 1)ack of Qocu, salwc cakuUred .-g I prelan S)nchro % nlmlxdublp \Inanwu a ,,,ncd to iw 25 feel I t) Cnscnaivcd vw-tloll and mtc -wa -2 --]A a 1 91d1 Iwr k, 11-1, of Oocuc Iallw% cakulalcd "all IIC\I ntelhrdok�') usurg S)nc'ho % SIDRA uxd 11r r.-dAlol al nmrunnn =I Ud Ranq-g rccwnnwudcd DHOL1404 Page 43 Pennoni 0 9 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 8. ANALYSIS OF 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Background traffic volumes represent future traffic that would travel through the Study area intersections without the proposed Freedom Manor development. The background traffic volumes were projected as Outlined below. a) Traffic Growth The annual traffic growth rate of 1.5% continued to be used for the 2026 background conditions. The 2026 volumes grown at 1.5% annually are shown in Figure 17. b) Approved / Unbuilt Background Developments No new additional background developments were projected for 2026 background conditions. The background developments used for 2020 background conditions, Madison Village and Frederick County Fourth High School, were also used for 2026 background conditions. Therefore, the 2026 and 2020 background development traffic assignments are identical. The background development traffic assignments arc shown again in Figure 18 for continuity. Site assignments for Madison Village will include diversions for access to Papermill Road for the total conditions scenario. Individual background development distributions and assignments, as well as Madison Village Commercial's pass -by assignments arc shown in Appendix D of this report (Figures DI-DS). c) Peak Hour Traffic Volu►nes The 2026 background traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak 11Ol11'S, shown in Figure 19, were determined by adding the 2026 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 18, to the 2026 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 17. d) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the ROUte 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the dcl`aUlt approach PI IF (Peak I-IOu►- Factor) of' 0.92 was used unless the existing PHI' was grCater. The thi-ce Signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized Using Sync111-0 8. Table 8 and Figure 20 show the anticipated 2026 background lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of'Service (LOS) at the study intersections. DHOL1404 Page 46 Pennoni 0 9 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the rollowing reSLlltS were obsel'ved: Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout': single lane with I 10 ft inscl'Ibed diametel') The volumes have not changed from 2020 background conditions and the rOUndabOUt C011tIl1LICS to Operate at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak 11OL11-S. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanesl) This intersection operates at overall LOS "13" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "D" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hOLIr and degrade to LOS "C" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the Plvl peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach degrades to LOS "F" while the Route 522 southbound approach degrades to LOS "L". As noted in the 2020 conditions, HCM analysis results cannot acCUI-ately portray field conditions as the C13 approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 it with a 65 (t taper). For the background conditions with optimization, the AM eastbound queue is at 310 ft while the PM queue as a single lane with right turn on red allowed is estimated at 830 ft. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was Utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. Providing a 325 ft right turn lane and right -turn overlap phase would improve AM peak hour approach LOS to "C" in the AM peak hOLIr and "D" in the PM peak hour with queues at 250 ft. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 47 Pennoni 0 • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 This alternative analysis Is not shown in Figure 20 and Table 8 bUt the SyIICbCO worksheets are included in Appendix G, labeled as "2 Lane Eli". For the PM peak, the 95°i percentile queue for the northbOLInd left-UH-11 would exceed the existing storage length. To accommodate the queue, lengthening the available storage to 350 ft from 300 It is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to-back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 50 it off the soutllbound left storage at Justes Drive, which is not an issue for the peak queues. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak 1101II. and at LOS "A" during the PM peak 110Ur. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2026 background conditions are included in Appendix G of this report. DHOL1404 Page 48 Pennoni 0 • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TAI3LE 8: 2026 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95''/o'I'ILE) RESULTS H Inteltiectioll I1a131c Control lane (:n,u1d 1 :\Il11r11fell I"Xisting/ I'rollosef1 (IIIn-llllic leng(lisl AM Peak lloul' I'M Peak Ilolll, .3 LOS , Delay (Ill see') Back of J S Quelle .. (Il) feet) ,, I.OS , I)ek1y (In see) Back of J C111C I11' (Ill feet) 2 _ Nladison VdL,ge Lntrmcc \lad. \hIL Conlnxrcul Street Roundabout 1:81; IR A 99 50 A 6.2 25 Ii13 LOS A 9.9 - A 6.2 - Wit1I:IR A 7.4 1 50 A 9.7 75 \V11 LOS A 7.4 - A 9.7 - NB I:IR A 93 "_'S A 5.8 25 \ II LOS A 9.3 - A 5.8 - SB TI R A 6.8 25 1 1% 7.0 25 SIII.OS A 6.8 - A 7.0 Over.,ll A 8.3 - A 8.3 - 3 Route 522 & \ladison Vllhge Entrance SiLnilin:d 1:13'1, c 33.6 226 D 53.6 205 H R 250 C 29.8 59 1) 51.0 55 1?B LOS C 31.9 - 1) 52.5 - N13 L 225 A 9.2 110 A 6.7 123 N13 ' A 04 205 A 0.2 163 1,113T 'N 13 LOS A 2.3 - A 1.7 - S I3 I' 13 14.9 198 A 9.5 273 S13'f - SBR 275 13 13.9 43 A 9.0 43 S13 LDS - 13 14.7 - A 9.3 - Ovelall 13 14.7 - 13 12.2 - 4 „ Route 522 l 11apenndl Road Signalind 1:131A 1) 53 0 310 P 95.8 831 EB LOS - 1) 53.0 - P 95.8 - N13,1, 3506 c 30.1 170 1: 914 349 NB,T - A 7.3 27 13 15.9 161 NBT Nit LOS 13 13.4 D 35.9 1 - SBT c 20.2 335 I: 71.6 535 S13-IR SB LOS C 20.2 - 1? 71.6 - Ovelall C 22.2 - F. 64.2 5 Route 522 l Jwstes Dritc Signalind %VB1, 225 c 33.1 138 D 49A 119 Wit R C 24.2 89 1 D 46.0 69 WB LDS C 27.7 1) 47.5 NBT 13 1L9 206 A 68 216 NBT NB R 325 A 56 26 A 20 25 \ 13 LOS - I3 10.3 A 6.4 - S13 1, 45O6 13 11.9 25 A 43 25 S13If - 13 12.0 25 A 00 108 SBIT SB LOS 13 12.3 \ 0.6 Over-all - 13 13.9 A 7.0 (1) I:B Lasixxmd, W13 = Westbound, NB ' Nlxd,lxwnd, Sit Southtxwnd. 1.Lell, I : I hru, R: Riolt (2) Turn -Line lengths do not include miler. All Blues are approxnnale. (3) LOS and DeLn values calcu4ued with I IC'\I meth(xfolog using Synchro 8. ( I) Signalved intersection 95111 percentile Back of Queue %,dues calcuLued using Synchro 8 proprielan methcxlology. Nlininuun assumed to be 25 feet. (5) SSnchro 8 unsignalved lntersection and intersection .,2 roluulalxxa 95th percentile Buck ol'Queue values calculated with I WNI n,ethodolo(,ry using Svnchro 8 (6) Retrying recommended. DHOL1404 Page 52 Pennoni 0 • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 9. ANALYSIS OF 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The interparcel connection between the Freedom Manor and Madison Village to the north was assumed to be open for 2026 total conditions, giving trips for both developments a choice between two entrances. ConsegUently, Madison Village and freedom Maim- traffic assignments needed to be altered. The resulting 2026 background development traffic assignments with the interparcel c011lleCti011, WhiCh illClUdes the high school trips that don't need to be modified, are shoNvn in Figure 21. Figure D5 and Figure D6 in Appendix D show the distribution and assignment percentages, and trip assignments, respectively, for only the Madison Village development with the interparcel connection with Freedom Manor. The 2026 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 17, were added to the 2026 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 21, to get 2026 background traffic volumes with the interparcel connection, in Figure 22. As shown in Table 9, Phase 2 of' the proposed Freedom Manor development adds additional site trips to the road network. Also, as noted above, the trip assignments need to be altered as a result Of the interparcel connection with Madison Village. As shown on Figure 23, the estimated regional distributions stay the same with 45%, 35%, and 20%, via Route 522 to the north, Route 522 to the south, and Paperlllill Road to the northwest, respectively. However, the site traffic assignments at the intersections were modified, with 35% of Freedom Manor trips estimated to utilize the Madison Village Entrance Oil Route 522. Site build -out trips assigned using the modified traffic assignments to obtain 2026 site (build -out) traffic assignments in Figure 24. The 2026 backgl-OUnd traffic VOIL1111Cs with the interparcel connection, shown in Figure 22, were added to the 2026 site (build -out) traffic assignments, shown in Figure 24, to arrive at 2026 total traffic VOILunes with the subject site, in Figure 25. DHOL1404 Page 54 Pennoni 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor TABLE 9: SI'I'E TRIP GENLItA'I'ION Revised August 12, 2015 I i f and Ure(1) IA!!'l:.l A'//Ill%X P3!!'l:,I A'lflll.'X Illll.l' Trip Generation By Right 210 ±lu P'1 70 DLL Single-1 ani Oct (\'190T') 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables PHASE 1 (2020) 210 2P11",, 100 DL' c SF Res n 100 DL(using EQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 1,050 210 21111— 100 DU Single -Faro Det (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 i3un.O.ou r(2026) 230 _ tin 200 OU Townhouse (using AVERAGE RA TE) 15 73 88 70 34 10.1 1.172 230 2111- 40 OU a TH Res @40 DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 '_5 19 9 29 2oO '_l1— 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VOOTStauntoaDalnctRate) 23 78 1(11 83 47 130 1,303 vital 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM P—k Hear PM Prak He,,, Dilly l:%feciii-c lhp Am, 12.3) wrekd- _lu \nlFl<F.rm D"1\1M 111 DU n,e _ 11n ui'o lulu `In \I R- a I -DI' DU uvi _+. ool A\i `Iu F k•.I .tin lkl DU u7i _ ., lul 9i2 A\ I 21, 1li-- DU It 17-., 1112 1„. i4, 2u1 Illlt<.a 111DI, DU uol Pr., u,n 1x. 12> Ina,llh�nl.e1\IN 114.1uR.al-1 DU 11n1 2-"'.. 1141 1.1.6 NII TRIP RATE SOURCE Trip Generation Manual (91h Edition). Inselule of Transportation ENaaaers, 2012 Asempe trip rates used, unless noted wth'a'. then equations used at site shmn, with data sot OK for R2 > 0 75 AND SD > 110% of aw (1) ITE Land Code shown as the list 3 d:04s Dcumal shwin hr internal use by Puneonl for lookup lahlo for trip rate wnahto (2) Effect- Inp rates ealcul ated by land use For avenge ores = (Dcmlry) . (.awe tip ire) = 2—y Tnp, x (mbwnd p,—a. c) for Tnps In For nE cqurua 'c noted a (Dnrury) . ( rip egareen) a 2—y Tnp, z Pnbound percenug,) log Tips In (3) Assumed 80ib of townhouses at Staunton District offechw Rates for tormhouse, condo, or apulinent DHOL1404 Page 55 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analyses Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other Study intersections. Also, the default approach PI -IF (Peak I -four Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PI -IF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized LISlllg SyI1CI11'0 8. Table 10 and Figure 26 show the anticipated 2026 total scenario lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hoL►i' Levels of' Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (I-ICM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8 and SIDRA for the proposed roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road, the following results were observed: Intersection #I: Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Roundabout) The intersection as a roundabout Will operate at acceptable approach LOS "A" for the AM peak hour and at an overall LOS "B" in the PM peak, with all approaches operating at an LOS "C" or better. Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout': single lane with 110 ft inscribed diameter) This I'OUndabollt C011611LICS t0 opel'ate at overall LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "B" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. I-ICS 2010 LOS Was utilized since operations are generally below capacity and the location is off -site on a local street. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: With turn lanes') This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "13" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches COntinuc to operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection 94: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at overall LOS "C" during the PM peak hour, With of With011t the site. The eastbound approach operates at LOS "L" during the AM peak hour. During the Plvl peak hour, With 01' witI10L1t the site, the castbound Papermill Road approach Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 61 Pennoni J • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 continues to operate at LOS "F" while the Route 522 southbound approach operates at LOS "E". For the AM peak, the overall delay increases From LOS "D" to LOS "E" with the peak hour queues increasing from 310 (eet to 352 f1cet with the site and as a single lane approach. For the PM peak without improvements, the LOS "F" delay increases the queues slightly from 831 feet to 840 ft with the site. ' his revised TIA analysis shows the conditions WlthOUt the fight tL11'11 pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was Utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geonletry. For the total conditions, the lane is not shown in the LOS graphics, to gauge the change of site traffic. For long-term conditions, the LOS is shown as an alternative with a 325 ft long extension of the right turn lane (with 100 ft taper) and a ►'Ight tL11-11 overlap phase to verify queues adequately. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. As shown in Table 10, the overall AM peak LOS improves from LOS "E" to LOS "C" with the turn lane and side street queues reduced to approximately 310 It. However, these improvements are not proposed directly with this subject application, since the site trips at this signal are only 2.8 percent of the short-term traffic volumes On Papermill Road, and only 5.4 percent for the long-term conditions, as shown in Table 9A below. TABLE 9A: SITU IMPACT A'T PAPEItNIILL ROAD App►nach Site Tips Total Voltuues Site Impacts 2020 PM Peak Hour EASTBOUND RIGHT Papermill Rd 12 430 2.8` ) EASTBO UN D Papermill Rd 27 668 4.1 % NORTHBOUND ROL►te 522 20 1020 2.0% SOUTI-IBOUND Route 522 26 964 2.7% TO'FALI 73 2653 2.7% 2026 PM Peak Hour EASTBOUND RIGHT Papermill Rd 27 498 5.4% EASTBOUND Papermill Rd 41 678 6.0% NORTI-IBOUND Route 522 56 1 135 4.9% SOUTI-IBOUND Route 522 28 983 2.9` ) TOTALI 125 1 2796 1 4.5`% DHOL1404 Page 62 Pennoni • • A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 With site impacts at less than 6 percent of the fl►ture traffic and the off -site improvements required to mitigate background conditions, the requirement to install as part of the Freedom Manor rezoning is not justified. The 95"' percentile queue for the northbound left -turn Would exceed the existing storage length. To provide additional stacking, lengthening the storage to 425 ft fi•om 300 it is recommended. The taper for the northbound Icft is currently back-to- back With the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping WOuld take 125 ft Off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Although the lengths are different, lengthening the northbound left -turn lanes is recommended With or Without the site. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "I3" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the I'M peak hour. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better. The Synchro 8 and SIDRA worksheets for 2026 Total conditions are included in Appendix H of this report. DHOL1404 Page 63 Pennoni • A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 10: 2026 TOTAL LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95°'/)'PILE) RESULTS 11 In lc nrclian T'mfGr C'onlml lanr Crt,old I .\ppmarh 1'.xisling/ I'mpusctl W 0anc knglhs° Ifcc1) AJI link Ilnur 1'M 1'cnk Iiuur , LOS , Oclny (in u•r) Ilnck of, . uct 6u(rcq lin , LOS Ocla) On srr) Iinrk of , Oucoct" lin fccll 1 11 1-nn It-d A` Su, linrm,cc Romdnt-9 Wit'Llt - A 91 33 A 77 25 \\'11 LOS A 9.4 A 7.7 - NISrIIt - A A 9 65 13 12 1 103 N'II LOS ,\ H.9 Il 12.1 SIS i.r - A 81 50 C Iri0 20. SIII.OS A 8.4 C I8.0 0,rn11 A 8.8 It 14.8 _ \IaJ nun \'IQs, 154rm,cc R-d ,C \Ind V,11 Con -ml SI-1 Romdalnn¢ WLialt - 11 Ill 9 75 A 6 7 25 Ell LOS II I11.9 A 6.7 WRIUR A 75 50 A 97 75 \\11 LOS ,\ 7.5 - A 9.7 Nil 1. [It - A ').1 25 A 59 25 NH LOS A 9.4 A .5.9 Slirrlit - A 69 25 A 7 1 25 Slims A 69 A 7.1 0,rm11 .\ 8.8 A 8.3 Itomc 522 \LJnun\Sthgc I7dmicc Sn7.f-d 1:111. - C 33 3 2.15 O 52 5 1 227 Iiltit 250 C• 21 5 1ri O .13 5 1.1 Ell LOS C 1 29.5 O 49.6 \B I. 200 A 96 25 A 6.1 51 \IVI - A 115 17_ A 112 rib \IVI - Nil LOS .\ 1.8 A 1.2 Sit'[ - Il IS 5 201 .\ '/ 3 275 Slt'I" - sitR 275 II Id 7 61 A 9 2 .15 SIi LOS It 15.3 A 9.3 - O,cm11 - It 14.1 - 13 11.4 - 1 Item, 522 X V.,p-,A ltnnd SepuL,d Gli'I.It - li 56 5 352 F 11.1 ri 9110 Ell LOS - is 56.5 F 114.8 \119. .121 I) 351 19.1 1' 10110 IUG ISrf A ri 5 16 H 13 G 117 NRII' NH LOS II 16.3 O 40.8 sit,[ (' 33 2 328 I: 7U 7 520 SHrIR - SIl LOS C 33.2 E 70.3 0,cm11 C 29.8 E 69.6 J Rum, 522 ,@ Rapcnmp RonJ Sn_.I-d Ahcnnlnc sseh lilt hoot Tom l-vc 1,1--n •,rx1 Owrhp I'lusc Eit I. C 27 5 100 C 27 7 1.45 Ell It 325 C• 11 7 123 1: 6-4 7 307 Ell LOS C 31!1 1) 54.8 \IS'l. 300 H I55 65 C 2.1.1 195 \ISrI' IS 13 S 25 ,\ 3 2 25 NRIF - NH LOS It 14.1 A '1.R sRT - C 25 3 37 C 33 5 272 SIVIR - (' 253 C 336 MI LOS C 25.3 C 33.5 0-11 - C 21.5 C 29.4 Item, 522 t 11L5k5 1)rl, l• Sluuisd WI34. 225 C 33 1 139 Il -1') 5 11 ) \4•&It - C• 2.12 91 Il 161 73 \5'11 LOS C 27.7 O 47.5 \It? - II 120 206 A 70 231 1)ri' NIPIt 325 A 5 6 27 A 2 0 25 Nil LOS 11 10.4 A 6.6 sit 1. 375,• H 12 I 25 A d 5 25 SIS'f 13 13 11 25 rA 1111 %% SIS'I' - MI LOS - H 12.7 A 0.6 O,amlt H IJ.11 A 7.0 (111:13 I'atllx„InJ \4'll \1'csllxxnd \Ii \',xlhhwld tilf -laillnxwntl I. IA:11. I Inrll. I( 1"pi (21 ruin.1- Lgtf. Ju Ixe uxhMk Wl- An,Aics arc 1111,1 uN O)LOS and Mb, ,A6cs cnLuhmJ w rh II('\I ud-k by -mg S)nchm ri SIURA uscJ I'ur nxuutdwm al mcescc l,xl n I N1 Se;ailveJ nrcruclan'151L Ix:¢cmA: IIacA of p,clw ,atw, caL-uhl,J using {noprclan S)Iwhm R nm Jaxlu4,tp \luuuum asammJ to Ia 25 feel 15) Cn,pul-d mlrncaxxl and mm,sccwn.2 nwlxUt-t 951h IumcnuL IlacA of Qucus ,aloes cnL•u4md onh IIC\1 nmlh,xlobip usng S)-ho R SIORA uwJ R r r-&Ax)w nl fter-wii =1 tbl Rcu gng,ccan -&d DHOL1404 Page 64 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 10. TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS 2020 and 2026 total VOI11111CS at the Papermill Road & Site Entrance intersection were analyzed for left and right -turn lane warrants found in the VDOT Road Design Manual, if a conventional at -grade intersection were pursued for the site access. As shown in Table 11, the 2020 total traffic volumes do not meet the warrant for a full - width fight-tUl'll lane on the northbound Papermill Road approach but the PM peak hour volumes meet for a taper. As shown in Table 12, the 2026 total traffic Volumes in the PM peak hour sleet the warrant for a full -width right -turn lane on the northbound Papermill Road approach. As shown in Table 13, the 2020 total Volumes for the PM peak hour meet the warrant I'or a left -turn lane on the southbound Papermill Road approach. As shown in Table 14, the 2026 total VOltlmes for both the AM and PM peak holll'S meet the warrant for a ICft-turn lane on the southbound Papermill Road approach. Because a left turn lane would require Substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off' -site properties, the access plan was revised to Support all Initial 1'011ndabOUt with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in this revised TIA, negating the need f61' tu1'11 lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design acco1111Tlodates the project VOIUrnes with the full bUlld-out of Freedom Manor, So additional ttll'll lanes are not proposed with this revision. DHOL1404 Page 66 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 11: RIGHT -TURN LANE WAItItAN"I' ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTItANCE (2020 TO'I'AL CONDITIONS) Papermill Road at Site Entrance Northbound Right -Turn Lane 120 100 t- :.:j:FULL-W;DTH TURN LANE AND TAcc PCf7 REC�UIREDI ja 80 - �tvSrA 0 . w NB0 t TAIEn PCf1U1p ED '5. �--.:''' :- ''•.. v. `!i' �O TLRN 20La.N�S :_: _:;':::':::; - — Grrr:lrElt�i:�cgt'is:�t�- — — — — —• I I I 100 200 300 4OU 15�0 Z00 700 NiV APPROACH TOTAL, VUJIJCTECI PCi11tOUR App•opha'e Radius rearmed at all Inte-snticrs :9nd Entrar.ys (Ccmmeroaf cc Private) Peak Hour: AM PM Papermill Road NB Approach Total 471 VPH 500 VPH Right Turns 16 VPH 46 VPH IN, Right Turns 3.4% 9.1% Right Turn Lane Warrant - Not Satisfied, Only Taper Required PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV fight turns - 40. and PHV total • 300 Adjusted nyht Iunis = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use fernlUla PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring u1 Iho peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note An average of 11°o for K x D will suffice FIGURE 3.26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 67 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 12: RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS Papermill Road at Site Entrance Northbound Right -Turn Lane ---------------�:' .. zo OR T.A.PE1t5 REQLTRED I I I I I I IC9 200 300 400 I 500 I Off 700 P14V APPROACH TOTAL. VD41CLIES PER HOUR :,pprcpnate Radius requirod at a'l InterseCtjans and Entranc±s (Convnercaal Ce Pnvatz) 40 -40. Peak Hour: AM PM PapernVi R oad NB Approach Total 441 VPH 542 VPf I RightTums 37 VPH 94VPFI "/a RightTums 8.4% 17.4% Right Turn Lane Warrant - Full -width turn -lane Required PHV . P.)ji, How `loluaw fal-=o DeslQn Haurty Volunio eyuwokmtl Adjustment for Right Turns rot posted sper.ls :it or unler •15 nlph PH'.( right rums - .10 and PHV IUaI . 300 hljuited nght tl.uls _ FIV Rlght Turns "0 If PHV is nct 4n✓.:n use formula PHV : ADT x K x D K : IN: percent of AADT ocaunng In the (:c:ak hour D = are pnrcenf o1 Ironic an the petty (! rechan of 01)4 Nola An era ;a of 111. far K x D!01 suffice FIGVRE J-24 GVIDELINE$ FQR RIGHT TVRH TREATMENT i2-LANE HtIG DHOL1404 Page 68 Pennoni 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 13: LEIT-TURN LANE WARItAN'1' ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TO'I'AL CONDITIONS) 2020 Build -out Conditions Papermill Road & Site Entrance Papermill Road Southbound Left -Turn VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX F TABLE 3-1: WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON 2 LANE HWY OPPOSING VOLUME (Vo) \ph ADVANCING VOLUME (Va) Kph SPEED (MPH) 50 50 50 50 LEFT TURN % 5 % 10% 20% 30% 350 800 280 210 165 135 420 600 350 280 195 170 540 400 410, 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 Calculations AM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 471 VPH 332 VPH 1.2% 4 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 71 540 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -80 -28 Adwncing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 1.2% 540 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 5 % -110 -27 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 540 -28 -27 Va warrant = 485 versus actual 332 OK, NOT WARRANTED Calculations PM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 501 VPH 652 VPH 1.7% 11 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 101 540 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -120 -61 Ad�encing Volumes Chart Volume Della of Va for x DELTA 1 7% 540 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 5% -70 -24 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 540 -61 -24 Va warrant = 456 versus actual 652 WARRANTED Figure Source VDOT Road Design rJanual. Calculations by rionnoni Peak Hour: AM PM Left Turns 4 VPH 11 VPH % Left Turns 1.2% 1.7% Advancing Volume (Papermill Rd SB Approach) 332 VPH 652 VPH Opposing Volume (Papermill Rd NB Approach) 471 VPH 501 VPH SB Left Turn Lane Warrant -Satisfied DHOL1404 Page 69 Pennoni ! 0- A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 14: LEPT-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS) 2026 Build -out Conditions Papermill Road & Site Entrance Papermill Road Southbound Left -Turn VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX F TABLE 3-1: WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON 2 LANE HWY OPPOSING VOLUME (Vo) Kph ADVANCING VOLUME (Va) Kph SPEED (MPH) 50 50 50 50 LEFT TURN % 5% 10% 20% 30% 800 280 210 165 135 600 350 280 .4& 195 170 400 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 Calculations AM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 441 VPH 357 VPH 16.0% 57 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 41 320 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -40 -8 Ad,,ancing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 6.0 % 320 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 10% -80 -46 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 320 -8 -48 Va warrant = 264 versus actual 357 WARRANTED Calculations PM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 542 VPH 724 VPH 13.8% 10o VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 142 320 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -40 -28 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Della of Va for x DELTA 3 8% 320 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 10% -80 -30 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 320 -28 -30 Va warrant = 261 versus actual 724 WARRANTED Figure Source VDOT Road Design Manual, Catculabons by Wnnonl 40 _111111111110- Peak Hour: AM PM Left Turns 57 VPH 100 VPH % Left Turns 16.0% 13.8% Advancing Volume (Papermill Rd SB Approach) 357 VPH 724 VPH Opposing Volume (Papermill Rd NB Approach) 441 VPH 542 VPH SIB Left Turn Lane Warrant -Satisfied DHOL1404 Page 70 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed subject development and the evaluation of 2014 existing conditions, 2020 background conditions, 2020 total conditions, 2026 background conditions, and 2026 total conditions, it was found that the surrounding roadway network can adequately accommodate the proposed site densities. The conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows: a) Trip Generation The proposed development would be built in two phases. Phase I is planned for initial site access for the single-f'anlily residential community with access to Papermill Road and would generate 1,050 daily trips, 80 trips during the AM peak hour, and 91 trips during the PM peak hour. Build -out of the project with access to Madison Village is projected to generate a total of 2,643 daily trips, 206 trips dllring the AM peak 11our, and 249 trips dllring the PM peak hour. b) Intersections Papermill Rocicl (Route 644) & Sile E'no-cince This unsignalized intersection is proposed to be built as a roundabout with Phase I of the project for primary site access. Phase 2 of the project would introduce Madison Village trips as well with the proposed interparcel connection. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable overall LOS "B" under both Phase I and Phase 2 conditions, with approach LOS at "C" or better conditions. Without a roundabout, the westbound approach out Of' the site during the 2026 PM peak hour is projected to operate at LOS "E" primarily, due to the high through volumes On Papermill Road. There were no projected queueing issues. Signalization is not anticipated to be warranted at the site entrance. Without a roundabout, a southbound Papermill Road left -turn lane and a northbound Papermill Road right -turn taper would be warranted with 2020 total PM peak hour volumes. The left -turn lane would be warranted with both AM and PM peak hour volumes Linder 2026 peak hour volumes. In addition, the 2026 PM peak hour volume would sleet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane. DHOL1404 Page 71 Pennoni • 0 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 BecaLlse a left turn lane WOUld require Substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that WOUld encroach On the Off -site properties, Pennoni has engaged Several iterations of alternatives InClUdi►lg reviewing n11I11n1UI11 Ic(i turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property Owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication WOUld be available. As noted ill pl'CVIOLIS meetings with VDOT, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) WOUld not support partial dedications or easements to allow the Papermill Road widening to be shared between the property owners at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit the turn lane improvements along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even all Option With a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported by the adjacent property owner's representatives. A copy of'the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to Support an initial roundabout With a 140 ft inscribed diameter IS proposed instead in the revised fIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-te►'nl VOlunlcs as I intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project VOlunlcS With the full build -out Of' Freedom Manor, so additional tU►•n lanes not proposed with this revision. r1,Icrdison Village Entrance Rowl & Madison Village Commercial Sheets This proposed ►'OUndabOLlt, to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "A" for all peak hours and analysis years. The roundabout was modeled as single -lane, With Single -lane approaches and all inscribed diameter Of 110 ft. Since this Was ail internal intersection off -site to Freedom Manor, the LOS is based on the FICM methodology as used in the Madison Village Traffic Study but updated with revised traffic volumes with Freedom Manor. jLlaclison Village Entr-ance Road & Roule 522 (Front Royal Pike) This proposed signalized intersection, also to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "Q" for all peak 11OUrs and analysis years With approach LOS "D" or better. There were no projected queueing ISSLICS With the tU►•n lane storage lengths suggested in this TIA. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Royal This signalized intersection CLlrrently Operates at overall LOS "Q" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbOUnd Papermill Road approach Operates at LOS "D". DHOL1404 Page 72 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Under 2020 background conditions without the Subject site, the eastbound approach WOUld deteriorate to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour With overall intersection LOS "D". Under 2026 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach WOUld deteriorate further to LOS "I" during the PM peak how' With Overall intersection LOS "E". Under 2020 total conditions with the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach will operate at LOS "F" during the PM peak hour With overall intersection LOS "D" Without Illll)I'OVCI1lCI1tS. Under 2026 total PM conditions, the overall intersection LOS WOUld be an "E". TO alleviate the Undesirable LOS without the site and address eastbound and northbound queueing during the IilturC analysis years, the following improvements are recommended, regardless Of the Subject site rezoning: 1. Lengthen the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn pocket, CUrrently about 35 ft, to 325 It. Due t0 the ShOrt CXISllllg tUrIl lane, the LOS was shown Without a separate turn lane in the revised analysis. 2. Incorporate an eastbound right -turn overlap phase to run C011Clll'I'Clltly With the northbOUIld ROtlte 522 ICIt-tUr'rl phase into the signal timing. 3. Lengthen northbound Route 522 northbOund left-tUrIl pocket by restriping the center lane oil ROute 522, CUrrently about 300 ft, to 425 f t. With these recommended improvements, the overall intersection LOS WOUld improve to "C" or better and the right -turn storage WOUld be Sufficient for 95t11 percentile queues for the critical 2026 PM peak hours. Approach LOS WOUld also improve to LOS "D" or better. Site impacts are negligible at the signal, at 2.7 percent of the intersection's total hourly traffic volume in the 2020 PM peak hour and 4.5 percent in the 2026 PM peak hour, With the PM peak hour being considered because it was worse than the AM peak hour. SO off' -Site right turn lane (C011StrUCtiOI1) is not recommended with site development. The site is providing Papermill Road improvements at its entrance. Rothe 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Jarsles Drive This signalized intersection CUrrently operates at overall LOS "A" in both peak IIOUI'S, with all approach LOS at "B" or better. DHOL1404 Page 73 Pennoni • 9 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 It will operate at overall LOS "l3" Under 2020 and 2026 background as well as total conditions. All the approaches will operate at LOS "D" or better. There were no observed queueing issues for any of the analysis years. c) Final Assessment: The proposed site densities can be adequately accommodated by the SUITOUnding roadway network with a I•oundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road as shown in Figure 3A. Off -site mitigations that could be considered by the County with Or without the site are: I. Lengthening of the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn lane at its intersection with Route 522 from the existing 35 ft to 325 ft. 2. At the same intersection, incorporating an eastbound right -turn Overlap signal phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase. DHOL1404 Page 74 Pennoni 0 0 APPENDIX 0 • A. Scoping Documents 0 �J / Virginia Department D0T of Transportation PRE -SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM Information on the Project Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions The applicant is responsible for entering the relevant information and submitting the form to VDOT and the locality no less than three (3) business days prior to the meeting. If a form is not received by this deadline, the scope of work meeting may be postponed. Contact Information Consultant Name: Pennoni Associates Inc. c/o Douglas Kennedy, PE " changes from 8/13 mtg Tele: (703) 840-4830 E-mail: dkennedyR( ennoni.com Developer/Owner Name: Dave Holliday Construction Tele: (5400 667-2120 E-mail: dholliday22604 a yahoo.com Project Information Project Name: Freedom Manor Locality/County: Frederick Project Location: Site is located east and adjacent to Papermill Rd (Route 644) approximately 2,500 (Attach regional and site feet north oi'the intersection of Papermill Road and Route 522. specific location ma Submission Type Comp Plan ElRezoning ® Site Plan ❑ Subd Plat ❑ Approximately 47.5 acres proposed for 100 SF Detached and 200 units as a mixture of Townhomes/Apts. All but approximately 13.5 acres are zoned currently (or Project Description: residential uses. Proposal is an expansion ol' a 26.87 acre portion of site rezoned as (Including details on the land use, acreage, phasing, access Freedom Manor in 2005 (or up to 70 single family lots. Proposed access provided location, etc. Attach additional by entrance on Valley Mill Road and connection at northern property line to north - sheet if necessary) south connector road in adjoining Madison Village project, rezoned by Frederick County in December 2013. Proposed Use(s): (Check all that apply; attach Residential ❑X Commercial ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other ❑ additional pages as necessary) Residential Uses(s) Number of Units: 300 ITE LU Code(s): 210 230** Other Use(s) ITE LU Code(s): Commercial Use(s) ITE LU Code(s): Independent Variable(s): Square Ft or Other Variable: It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. Total Peak Hour Trip Less than 100 ❑ 100 — 499 ® 500 — 999 ❑ 1,000 or more ❑ Projection: Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions Study Period Existing Year: 2013/2014 Build -out Year: 2020 Design Year: 2026 North: Madison Village South: Justes Drive ** Study Area Boundaries (Attach map) East: Rte 522 West: I-81 External Factors That Could Affect Project Madison Village project to north. Freedom Manor proposal would connect with and (Planned road improvements, extend North -South Connector Road. other nearby developments) Comprehensive plan identifies site as "residential" and "high density residential" Consistency With land uses. Comprehensive Plan does not identify any future roadways on the subject Comprehensive Plan site, but the proposal would provide for a north -south connection utilizing the (Land use, transportation plan) coffered connector through the adjoining Madison Village site. Available Traffic Data See Table 2, Historical Traffic Trends for Rte 522 and Papermill Rd (Rt 644) with (Historical, forecasts) effective growth rate flat Road Name: Rte 522 N 40% Road Name: Ric 522 S 35% Trip Distribution Road Name: Papermi{I Rd W Road Name: Airport Rd 5% (Attach sketch) 20% Peak Period for Study ®AM Z PM El SAT Annual Vehicle Trip 15% (check all that apply) Peak Hour of the Generator Growth Rate: 1.Papermill Rd/Rte 522 6. 2.Papermill Rd/Site Lntr 7. Study Intersections 3.Justes Drive*'' 8. and/or Road Segments (Attach additional sheets as 4.Future IVladison Village/522** 9. necessary) S.Future Madison Village 10. roundabout"* Internal allowance: El Yes Z No ❑Yes ®No Pass -by allowance: El Trip Adjustment Factors ° Reduction: /o trips /o Reduction: trips Software Methodology ®Synchro ❑ HCS (v.2000/+) ❑ aaSIDRA ❑ CORSIM ❑Other Traffic Signal Proposed Existing signal PaperMill Rd at 522, Synchro 8 or Affected It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. E (Analysis software to be used, progression speed, cycle length) Improvement(s) Assumed or to be Future Signalization, if warranted at Madison Village, for long-term; East Tevis Considered corridor for long-term Background Traffic Studies Considered Madison Villa ge approved at 640 DU, 107,000 sf specialty retail, check Justes Drive warrant** ❑ Master Development Plan (MDP) Generalized Development Plan (GDP) Plan Submission ❑ Preliminary/Sketch Plan ❑ Other Plan type (Final Site, Subd. Plan) ❑ Queuing analysis ❑ Actuation/Coordination ❑ Weaving analysis Additional Issues to be ❑ Merge analysis Bike/Ped Accommodations ❑ Intersection(s) Addressed ❑ TDM Measures ❑ Other NOTES on ASSUMPTIONS: Since limited growth in corridor, update 2005 Traffic Analysis with new uses base on 2013/2014 traffic counts at Papermill Rd from Madison Village and Justes Drive warrant analysis** . No new counts proposed. Compare link volumes on Rte 522 with East Tevis Road forecasts and Madison Village Study. Check link volumes on Rte 522 and on Papermill Rd Use Staunton District revised trip rates for TH for both MF and townhouse uses ** Check turn lane warrants at site entrance, limited R-O-W ** for: Site build -out with single access with density equivalent to SF Detached around 70 DU ** Long-term with access to Madison Village, include internal roundabout Format report update and follow Traffic Operations guidelines with current VDOT organization for 527 review Include Bike and Ped Accomdation references, check County Plan for regU►rements** Will need to have County document through rezoning process that Westwood Drive extension to the site is not desired, and prohibited with Deed restriction. Direct access to 522 not preferred. VDOT guidance for 3 access for 300 DU, identify interparcel *"" Add Justes Drive intersection to study based on recent warrant study** It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. 9 SIGNED: C)(z DATE: 8-5-14, revised for 8/13 mtg on 8-22-14 PRINT NAME: Applicant or Consultant Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Applicant or Consultant It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. FREEDOM MANOR Table 1 DRAFT Trip Generation ITE Land Use (1) ;fill PEAR HOUR CODE CODE_ DENSITY Van USE IN OUT TOTAL 210 210.190 210 210.170 I210 210.100 230 230.000 230 230.180 231 231.200 Trip Generation By Right 70 DU Single -Faro. Det. (VDOT) 13 40 53 Trip Generation options and land use variables 100 DU e SF Res. @ 100 DU 20 60 80 100 DU Single-Fam. Det. 19 56 75 AVERAGE RATES 200 DU Townhouse 15 73 88 40 DU e TH Res @ 40 DU 160 DU (3) Low -Rise Condo/TH August 2014 PM PEAR HOUR I I DAILY IN OUT TOTAL 2-wa 44 57 63 70 26 70 700 34 91 1,050 37 100 952 34 104 1,172 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 27 80 107 73 52 125 1,280 Total 51 161 212 149 95 244 2,620 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Effective Ti-ip Rates (2.3) 2-wa % Inbound 2-way)% Inbound Weekday 210 Single-Fam. Det. (VDOT) DU 0.76 25% 1.00 63% 10.00 210 SF Res. /u 100 DU DU 0.80 25% 0.91 63% 10.50 AVE 210 Single -Pam. Det. DU 0.75 25% 1.00 63% 9.52 AVE 230 TownhOUse DU 0.44 17% 0.52 67% 5.86 230 TI-1 Res rr1 40 DU DU 0.63 16% 0.70 68% 7.25 231 Lo\v-Rise Condo/-ITI DU 0.67 25% 0.78 58% 8.00 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012. Average trip rates used, unless noted with "e", then equations used at size shown, with data set OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SD > 110% of ave. (1) ITE Land Code shown as the first 3 digits. Decimal shown for internal use by Pennoni for lookup table for trip rate variable. (2) Effective trip rates calculated by land use: For average rates = (Density) x (ave. trip rate) = 2-way Trips x (inbound percentage) for Trips In For ITE equations, "e" noted = (Density) x ( trip equation) = 2-way Trips x (inbound percentage) for Trips In (3) Assu °° tes, Daily default at 8 trips/DU) Update MF and TH rates per Staunton default rates 8-13 1�1 L� Pennoni Associates, Inc. 1, �Pennoni_FreedomHal I Tripgen_20140805.xls Freedom Manor 10 TABLE 2 VDOT HISTORICAL TRAFFIC GROWTH TREND August 2014 VDO"T Traffic Growth Trend Front Royal Pike (Route 522) hr twnen Marridnnla Churrh Rd & Panermill Road YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 15,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.7% 2011 15,000 -6.3% -1.6% -1.1% 2.3% 2010 16,000 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 2009 16,000 6.7% 0.0% 1.1% 2008 15,000 -6.3% 0.0% 1.2% 2007 16,000 0.0% 1.6% 4.9% 2006 16,000 0.0% 3.4% 2005 16,000 6.7% 7.5% 2004 15,000 0 0% 2003 15,000 7.1% 2002 14,000 16.7% 2001 12.000 Average Growth Rate 2.2% 1.4% 1.0% 1.5% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.5% 0.2% 0.7% Front Royal Pike (Route 522) hntwnnn Rnufn 5n P. Pannrmill Rnad YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 14,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.0% 2011 14,000 0.0% -3.3% -1.1% 3.8% 2010 14.000 0.0% -1.7% -1.1% 2009 14,000 0.0% -1.7% 0.0% 2008 14,000 -12.5% -1.7% 0.0% 2007 16,000 6.7% 3.4% 8.9% 2006 15.000 0.0% 1.7% 2005 15,000 0.0% 11.8% 2004 15,000 7.1% 2003 14,000 0.0% 2002 14,000 45.8% 2001 9,600 Average Growth Rate 4.3% 1.1% 0.9% 1.9% w/o 2001 0.1% -0.5% -0.7% 0.070 Papermill Road (Route 644) between Route 522 & SCL Winchester YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 7,800 0.0% -1.5% -2.5% 0.6% 2011 7,800 -6.0% -5.1% -2.5% 2.4% 2010 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 0.6% 2009 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 1.3% 2008 8,300 -13.5% 0.9% 2.3% 2007 9.600 5.5% 5.7% 8.8% 2006 9,100 0.0% 7.1 % 2005 9,100 13.8% 13.0% 2004 8,000 3.9% 2003 7,700 4.1% 2003 7.400 17.5% 2002 6,300 Average Growth Rate 2.3% 2.0% 1.3% 1.5% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.4% -U.Y7o U.b7o SOURCE: VDOT, Traffic Engineering Division, VDOT Average Daily Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates, Jurisdiction Report 34. Pennoni Associates, Inc X \PROPOSAI-SkRegion 5 Virginia\Chantilly\1700\2014\1403151 Froodom HaInVDOT Growth_121013_Tevis Moddied_PaperM ill xls 0 L_J `\\y DOTof Virginia Department Transportation PRE -SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM Information on the Project Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions The applicant is responsible for entering the relevant information and submitting the form to VDOT and the locality no less than three (3) business days prior to the meeting. If a form is not received by this deadline, the scope of work meeting may be postponed. Contact Information Consultant Name: Pennoni Associates Inc. c/o Douglas Kennedy, PE Tele: (703) 840-4830 E-mail: dkennedy a pennoni.com Developer/Owner Name: Dave Holliday Construction Tele: (5400 667-2120 E-mail: dholliday22604 a yahoo.com Project Information Project Name: Freedom Manor Locality/County: Frederick Project Location: Site is located east and adjacent to Papermill Rd (Route 644) approximately 2,500 (Attach regional and site feet north of the intersection of Papermill Road and Route 522. specific location ma Submission Type Comp Plan ❑ Rezoning Site Plan ❑ Subd Plat ❑ Approximately 47.5 acres proposed for 100 SF Detached and 200 units as a mixture orTownhomes/Apts. All but approximately 13.5 acres are zoned currently for Project Description: residential uses. Proposal is an expansion of a 26.87 acre portion of site rezoned as (Including details on the land use, acreage, phasing, access Freedom Manor in 2005 for up to 70 single family lots. Proposed access provided location, etc. Attach additional by entrance on Valley Mill Road and connection at northern property line to north - sheet if necessary) south connector road in adjoining Madison Village project, rezoned by Frederick County in December 2013. Proposed Use(s): (Check all that apply; attach Residential X❑ Commercial ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other ❑ additional pages as necessary) Residential Uses(s) Number of Units: 300 ITE LU Code(s): 210 220 Other Use(s) ITE LU Code(s): 230 and 231 Commercial Use(s) ITE LU Code(s): Independent Variable(s): Square Ft or Other Variable: It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. • Total Peak Hour Trip Less than 100 ❑ 100 — 499 ® 500 — 999 ❑ 1,000 or more ❑ Projection: Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions Study Period Existing Year: 2005/2014 Build -out Year: 2020 Design Year: 2026 North: Madison Village South: Paper Mill Rd Study Area Boundaries (Attach map) East: Rte 522 West: 1-81 External Factors That Could Affect Project Madison Village project to north. Freedom Manor proposal Would connect With and (Planned road improvements, extend North -South Connector Road. other nearby developments) Comprehensive plan identifies Site as "residential" and "high density residential" Consistency With land uses. Comprehensive Plan does not identify any future roadways On the subject Comprehensive Plan site, bUt the proposal Would provide for a north-SOUth Connection Utili7_ing the (Land use, transportation plan) roffered connector through the adjoining Madison Village site. Available Traffic Data See Table 2, Historical Traffic Trends for Rte 522 and Papermill Rd (Rt 644) with (Historical, forecasts) effective growth rate flat Road Name: Rte 522 N 40% Road Name: Rte 522 S 35% Trip Distribution Road Name: Papermill Rd W Road Name: Airport Rd 5% (Attach sketch) 20% Peak Period for Study HAM O PM ❑ SAT Annual Vehicle Trip 2% (check all that apply) Peak Hour of the Generator Growth Rate: 1.Paperrnill Rd/Rte 522 6. 2.Papermill Rd/Site Entr 7. Study Intersections 3 $ and/or Road Segments (Attach additional sheets as 4. 9. necessary) 5. 10, Internal allowance: [I Yes ® No Pass -by allowance: ❑ Yes No Trip Adjustment Factors /o Reduction: trips Reduction: /o trips Software Methodology © Synchro ❑ HCS (v.2000/+) ❑ aaSIDRA ❑ CORSIM ❑ Other Traffic Signal Proposed or Affected Existing signal PaperMlll Rd at 522, Synchro 8 (Analysis software to be used It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. r� L u progression speed, cycle length) Improvement(s) Assumed or to be Future Signalization. if warranted at Madison Village, for long-term; East Tevis Considered corridor for long-term Background Traffic Studies Considered Madison Village approved at 640 DU, 107,000 sf specialty retail ❑ Master Development Plan (MDP) Z Generalized Development Plan (GDP) Plan Submission ❑ Preliminary/Sketch Plan ❑ Other Plan type (Final Site, Subd. Plan) ❑ Queuing analysis ❑ Actuation/Coordination ❑ Weaving analysis Additional Issues to be ❑ Merge analysis ❑ Bike/Ped Accommodations ❑ Intersection(s) Addressed ❑ TDM Measures ❑ Other NOTES on ASSUMPTIONS: Since limited growth in corridor, update 2005 Traffic Analysis with new uses base on 2005 traffic counts at Papermill Rd.. No new counts proposed. Compare link volumes on Rte 522 with East Tevis Road forecasts and Madison Village Study. Check link volumes on Rte 522 and on Papermill Rd Check Will lane warrants at site entrance (or: Site bold -out with single access Long-tem with access to Madison Village Trips may reduce with site activities as Multi -Family Apartments, not in Table I. SIGNED: PRINT NAME: Applicant or Consultant Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Applicant or Consultant DATE: 8-5-14 Attachments: Location Map Table 1 : Trip generation Table 2 : Historical Growth Trends July 2005 TIA for Freedom Hall It is important for the applicant to provide sufficient information to county and VDOT staff so that questions regarding geographic scope, alternate methodology, or other issues can be answered at the scoping meeting. Freedom Hall Table 1 DRAFT Trip Generation ITE Land Use (1) AM PEAK HOUR CODE CODE DENSITY Var. USE IN OUT TOTAL 210 210.190 210 210.170 I210 210.100 230 230.000 230 230.180 231 231.200 Trip Generation By Right 70 DU Single -Faro. Det. (VDOT) 13 40 53 Trip Generation options and land use variables 100 DU e SF Res. @ 100 DU 20 60 80 100 DU Single-Fam. Det. 19 56 75 AVERAGE RATES 200 DU Townhouse 15 73 88 40 DU e TH Res @ 40 DU 160 DU (3) Low -Rise Condo/TH August 2014 1`41 PEAK HOUR DAILY IN OUT TOTAL 2-rva 44 57 63 70 26 70 700 34 91 1,050 37 100 952 34 104 1,172 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 27 80 107 73 52 125 1,280 Total 51 161 212 149 95 244 2,620 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Effective Trip Rates (2.3) 2-wa % Inbound 2-way)% Inbound Weekday 210 Single-Fam. Det. (VDOT) DU 0.76 25% 1.00 63% 10.00 210 SF Res. c� 100 DU DU 0.80 25% 0.91 63% 10.50 AVE 210 Single-Fam. Det. DU 0.75 25% 1.00 63% 9.52 AVE 230 Townhouse DU 0.44 17% 0.52 67% 5.86 230 TH Res c 40 DU DU 0.63 16% 0.70 68% 7.25 231 Loy\, -Rise Condo/-ITI DU 0.67 25% 0.78 58% 8.00 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012. Average trip rates used, unless noted with "e", then equations used at size shown, with data set OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SD > 110% of ave. (1) ITE Land Code shown as the first 3 digits. Decimal shown for internal use by Pennoni for lookup table for trip rate variable. (2) Effective trip rates calculated by land use: For average rates = (Density) x (ave. trip rate) = 2-way Trips ; x (inbound percentage) for Trips In For ITE equations, "e" noted = (Density) x ( trip equation) = 2-way Trips ; x (inbound percentage) for Trips In (3) Assumed 80% of townhouse rates at ITE Land Use Code 231 (to default to Staunton District effective Rates, Daily default at 8 trips/DU) L1 0 Pennoni Associates, Inc. Pennoni_FreedomHall Tripgen_20140805.xls 0 • Freedom Hall TABLE 2 August 2014 VDOT HISTORICAL TRAFFIC GROWTH TREND VDOT Traffic Growth Trend Front Royal Pike (Route 522) hntwnnn Marodonin Church Rd & Panormill Road YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 15,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.7% 2011 15,000 -6.3% -1.6% -1.1% 2.3% 2010 16,000 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 2009 16.000 6.7% 0.0% 1.1% 2008 15,000 -6.3% 0.0% 1.2% 2007 16,000 0.0% 1.6% 4.9% 2006 16,000 0.0% 3.4% 2005 16,000 6.7% 7.5% 2004 15.000 0.0% 2003 15,000 7.1% 2002 14,000 16.7% 2001 12,000 Average Growth Rate 2.2% 1.4% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.5% 0.2% 0.77. Front Royal Pike (Route 522) hntwoon Rnntn Ff1 & Panormill Rnad YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 14,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.0% 2011 14,000 0.0% -3.3% -1.1% 3.8% 2010 14,000 0.0% -1.7% -1.1% 2009 14,000 0.0% -1.7% 0.0% 2008 14,000 -12.5% -1.7% 0.0% 2007 16,000 6.7% 3.4% 8.9% 2006 15,000 0.0% 1.7% 2005 15,000 0.0% 11.8% 2004 15,000 7.1% 2003 14,000 0.0% 2002 14,000 45.8% 2001 9,600 Average Growth Rate 4.3% 1.1% 0.9% 1.9% w/o 2001 0.1% -0.5% -0.7% 0.07. Papermill Road (Route 644) between Route 522 & SCL Winchester YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 7.800 0 0% -1.5% -2.5% 0.5% 2011 7,800 -6.0% -5.1% -2.5% 2.2% 2010 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 0.6% 2009 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 1.3% 2008 8,300 -13.5% 0.9% 1.9% 2007 9,600 5.5% 5.7% 7.3% 2006 9,100 0.0% 5.3% 2005 9,100 13.8% 9.6% 2004 8,000 3.9% 2003 7,700 4.1% 2002 7,400 17.5% 2001 6, 300 Average Growth Rate 2.3% 1.3% 1.0% 1.3% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.17. -U.3% e.oi° SOURCE: VDOT, Traffic Engineering Division, VDOT Average Daily Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates, Jurisdiction Report 34. Pennoni Associates, Inc. X 1PROPOSALSUtegion 5 Virginia\Chan611y\170012014F1403151 Freadom HaIINDOT GrovAh_121013_Tevis Moddied_PaperMill.xls 0 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engineers. surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. PH R+ALeesburg, Church Slrnia S E. Phone:7Virginia20175 16 Phone: 703.777.3616 Fax: 703.777.3725 To: Evan Wvatt Organization/Company: Grcenway I-,ngincering From Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: Nfichael Glickman, f'I? July 22, 2004 freedom i\Ianor 13083-1-0 Memorandum Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PI-IR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Frecdom Manor site to be located northwest of the Papermill Road/Route 522 (front Royal Pike) intersection in Frederick County, Virginia. The project is to include a total of 120 single family detached residential units with primary site -access to be provided along ROlite 522 and secondary site -access to be provided along Papertnill Road. The development will be built -out in a single transportation phase by the year 2006. Pl-IR+A has provided Figure 1 to illustrate the location of the freedom lfanor site with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the freedom Manor site were obtained thrOUgh a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of impact, • Calculation of the Frcedom Manor trip generation, • Distribution and assignment of the freedom Manor generated trips onto the completed roadway network, • Analysis of capacity and levels of service using the newest version of the highway capacity software, I ICS-2000, for existing and future conditions. Page I of 11 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc O i T p v 'Q F 7 � SITE E Mamoual Palk 0 IS n n n —1 H Freedom Manor Fi;;urc 1 Vicinit- Map Memorandum To. 1:%-an \\ att Page 2of11 Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Memorandum To: Evan Wyatt Page 3 of 11 Existing Conditions PI-IR+A conducted ANI and P\I peal: hour manual turning; movement counts at the intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522 (Front Ronal Pikc) in Frcderick County, Virginia. In order to determine the r\DT (:\N eragc Daily 'Traffic) along the study area roadway links, a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumCs to 24-11our traffic volumes) of 9.2% was calCUlated based upon existing traffic volumes (design hour and 24-hour) published by the Virginia Department of "Transportation (VDO-f). Figure 2 shows the existing ,\DT and AIM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and ANI/PM peak hour I-ICS-2000 levels of setvice. .AIl traffic Count data and I-ICS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this menu0randum. 2006 Background Conditions PI-IR+,\ increased the existing traffic volumes along Papermill Road and Route 522 using a consen-ative growth rate of five percent (5%) per year through Year 2006. Figure 4 shows the 2006 background .AD'T and RANI/P\I peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2006 background lane geometry and ANI/PNI peal: hour I ICS-2000 levels of service. All I ICS-2000 levels of service worksheets arc included in the Appendix section of this memorandum. Trip Generation The total trips produced by and attracted to the Freedom Manor site were established using equations and rates provided in the 7"' Edition of the ]nstitute of "Transportation I?nginecrs' (TIE) 7ir/ Generalion RePoi . Table 1 shows the trip generation results for the proposed freedom Manor development. Table I Freedom Manor Trip Generation Summary AM Peak (lour PNI Peak (lour Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT 210 Single -Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 Total 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects n Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc • Memorandum To: FIvan Wyatt Page 4 of I 1 No Scale 7 O EL 7O Y. 0 522 SITE J U� 1" �1 t >tt)x01 � 1 522 AYI Peak llour(Ml Peak (lour) 1 nT Try-�-n JL" 14 Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc No Scale 0 Memorandum To: Evan Wyatt Page5of11 AM Peak ►►our(IINI Peik flour) Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Memorandum To: I?van Wyatt Page 6 of 11 i No Scale v 0 0 0 0 Y n 522 SITE jJ U� �J O al ►zz)Hri 1 522 AIM Peak Ilour(I'M Peak }four) 1 P H Figure 4+ 200G Background Traffic Conditions Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects E Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Memorandum To: I?van Wyatt Page 7 of I 1 No scan .'o 0 Oj 0 G L Links Analysis LOS = A(A) 522 Links Analysis SITE LOS = A(B) Signalized tm Intersection d i l LOS = B(B) �tT m 522 nT TQ+n Ail Peak Ilour(PM Peak Hour) JL nl Figure 5 2006 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects • 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Memorandum To: livan Wyatt Page 8 of I TRIP DISTRIBUTION The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed site. Figure 6 represents the distribution percentages for trips produced by and attracted to Freedom Manor. 2006 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS 'I'lie 1"reedom Manor assigned trips ('fable '1) were added to the 2006 background traffic volumes (1�igure 4) to obtain the 2006 build -out conditions. Figure 7 shows the 2006 build -out AD'I' and ANI/PNI peak hour traffic volumes at the intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522. Figure 8 shows the corresponding 2006 build -out lane geometry and iANI/PNI peak hour I-ICS-2000 levels of service. :\ll I-ICS-2000 levels of set\ -ice worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this mcnlorandL1111. CONCLUSION 1'he traffic impacts associated with the build -out of 1-,'reedom Manor are acceptable and manageable. '111e following details the I-ICS-2000 levels of service results: I-ICS-2000 "Signals" Intersection :\nalvscs: The intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522 will operate with levels of setl,ice "I3" or better during existing, 2006 background and 2006 build -out conditions. T ICS-2000 "Nlulti-lane" Link \nalvscs: Route 522, north of the intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522, will operate with levels of service "A" during existing, 2006 background and 2006 build -out conditions. I-ICS-2000 "'I'wo-lane" Link zAnalvscs: Papermill Road, west of the intersection of Papermill Road/Route 522, will operate with levels of service "I3" or better during existing, 2006 background and 2006 build -out conditions. Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc i Memorandum No Scale 74 � I 1 � I n^ � O p G T n 522 SITE 522 � I n P+n IL" Figure 6 Trip Distribution Percentages To: I_.van Watt Page 9 of 1 1 Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects i Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Memorandum To: Evan Wyatt Page 10 of 11 i No Scale A 0 i o� o w_ -o T Q 522 SITE �W N �J i �11 t N N VI � tJ O 522 ANI Peak flour(PNI Peak flour) P1 �( l FH Figurc 7 2006 Build -out Traffic Conditions Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects • E Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Memorandum To: Cavan W5-,itt Pagc I I of I I No Scale A Jam% 7 O Q �G = Links Analysis LOS = A(A) 522 Links Analysis SITE LOS = B(B) Signalized m Intersection A1 LOS = 13(13) Ott m m 522 T T4 A ANI Peak llour(PNI Peak flour) 1 NL � Figure 8 2006 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers • Surveyors • Planners e Landscape Architects • • B. Traffic Counts • • Tvnp of naak hour heino reoorted. Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Front Royal Pike -- Papernill Rd CITY/STATE: Winchester VA QC JOB #: 13005001 DATE: Wed, Oct 01 2014 ♦ ♦ L Peak -Hour: 7:15 AM -- Peak 15-Min: 7:30 AM -- 8:15 AM 7:45 AM 131 121 Ia00 L 294 ~ 62 J t ~ 0 �J .01 i9 t. • 65 J t 00 092 0 0.85 ~ "!00 00 .0 ON ~ 00 192�1301.1 ♦ rr ♦ t98 a53 O's F uality (IQ Counts 5a ♦ 1 ♦ r• r 000 1 04 ♦ 548 074 691 ♦O '00 0,..,0 0 O✓.s.L I 0 ' jO� ` 0 0 . e+ O F 7 F O✓4t.0 1.0,# L .. OIL • • NA ~ • I 1 r O♦♦,O �r N�O 15-Min Count Front Royal Pike Period (Northbound) Front Royal Pike (Southbound) Papernill Rd (Eastbound) Papernill Rd Total (Westbound) Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U 6 00 AM 9 45 0 0 Leh 0 Thru Riaht U 56 7 0 Left 4 Thru 0 Right _ U 20 C Left 0 Thru Right U 0 0 0 141 6 15 AM 16 54 0 0 6 30 AM 31 57 0 0 0 0 100 5 0 105 11 0 7 8 0 0 21 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 203 0 0 0 249 6 45 AM 27 81 0 0 7 00 AM 35 73 0 0 0 0 65 8 0 62 7 0 11 11 0 -- 0 30 0 _ _23 _ _0 0 0 0 0 0 222 _ _ 0__ 0 0 211 815 885 _.__ 715AM 46 1ti 0 0 7:30IiAA 45 1� 0 0 g8 18 0 — 12 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 319 t 408 1001 1161 7 45 AM 72 161 0 0 8 00 AM 35 92 0 0 0 0 87 33 0 75 19 0 20 18 0 0 32 0 25 0 0 -0 0 0 0 I 405 - 0 0 0 1 282 t 344 1395 8 15 AM 49 96 0 0 8 30 AM 51 105 0 0 0 0 86 12 0 110 17 0 16 12 0 0 27 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 286 0 0 0 332 1362 1285 8 45 AM 63 144 0 0 0 78 17 0 17 0 26 0 0 0 0 0 345 1225 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Riuht U Lett Southbound Thru Ri ht U L♦ft Thru Eastbound Right U Left Westbound Thru Right U _ Total All Vehicles 180 516 0 0 Heavy Trucks 8 68 0 0 0 632 104 0 108 4 56 8 0 0 148 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 1636 0 0 212 Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad IStopmd Buses Comments Report generated on 10/9/2014 11 24 PM SOURCE. Quality Counts. LLC (http //www qualitycounts net) 1-877-58U-2212 • 0 Tvne of neck hour heina renorted. Intersection Peak Method for determinlnq peak hour Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Front Royal Pike -- Papermlll Rd CITYISTATE: Winchester VA QC JOB #: 13005002 DATE: Wed Oct 01 2014 716 664 • 06♦ 1s3 543 o Peak -Hour: 4:30 PM -- 5:30 PM Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM 59 69 � • 47 62 00 352 ~ 121 L 0 0 0 34 0 50 J L 00 « 0 090 0 0.94 0 0 000 00 ~ 4. 00 493 � 37 � .� ♦ r. f 0 0 C 229 s43 °F Quality Counts 1 6 ~ 0 5 � .t s r. � 00 0 00 31 74 • 965 095 772 • .I 40 61 L d 4 1. L I I 0 J O L ° .. F_ �l ° LIt. • L ♦ 41 J• • 417 r• F 15-Min Count Front Royal Pike Period (Northbound) Front Royal Pike (Southbound) Paperrnill Rd (Eastbound) Papermill Rd Total Hourly (Westbound) Totals Beginning At Left _ Thru Ri_q-ht U . _ _ - . 62 ' 3. 0 0 Left 0 Thru Right U 104 34 0 Left 24 Thru 0 Right U 55 0 Left 0 Thru Right 0 0 0 409 4 -^ %' 68 13- 0 0 4 30 PM 62 138 0 0 0 0 134 18 0 152 26 0 22 24 0 0 66 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 0 445 0 0 0 478 4 45 PM 59 152 0 0 _5:00 PM 599 W —0 0 0 137 35 0 15 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 476 1808 525__-1-._1924 5 15 PM 49 123 0 0 530 PM 72 104 0 0 0 0 141 34- 0 119 22 0 1 42 27 0 0 113 0 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 502 1981 0 0 0 411 1914 5 45 PM 55 101 0 0 6 00 PM 45 86 0 0 0 0 123 30 0 102 28 0 23 24 0 0 62 0 68 0 0 0 0 0 0 394 1832 0 0 0 353 1660 6 15 PM 48 82 0 0 6 30 PM 42 108 0 0 0 0 90 25 0 79 41 0 22 17 0 0 63 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 0 330 1488 0 0 0 351 1428 6 45 PM 45 92 0 0 0 71 18 0 11 0 37 0 0 0 0 0 274 1308 Peak 15-Min Northbound Flowrates Left Thru Right Left Southbound Thru_ Right U Left Eastbound Thru Right U left Westbound Thru Right U _ Total All Vehicles 236 520 0 0 Heavy Trucks 20 16 0 0 0 552 112 0 16 4 160 0 0 0 426 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2100 0 0 56 Pedestrians 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad IStowed Buses Comments Report generated on 10/9/2014 11 25 PM SOURCE Quality Counts. LLC (http 77www quawycounis.nei) i -t t t-oau- — 0 0 LEGEND Q123 (123) = AM (PM) Pk.Hr. Traffic Volumes CIO �Z T 1,200 vpd = Daily Traffic Volume (vch. per day) r Estimated (per 0.10 PM pk. hr. "K" factor) Traffic Signal moo 9,486 vpd L 0 Paper Mill Rd. (Rt.644) I 0 (0) 65(127) J Private Driveway 0 (0) — 217 (349) --1 610710S 7r� ` IYI N . V I T T K A No Scale Lc 0 M P A N-YJ -zj O 00 I L Existing 2005 Roadway Network & AAI/PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes 6 IF, IGURE 2 0 0 C. 2014 Existing Conditions - Synchro Worksheets • 0 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 + I Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y '� Tt fl� Volume (vph) 62 198 493 416 Lane Group Flow (vph) 208 268 666 731 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 15.0 42.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 25.0% 70.0% 45.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None Min Min v/c Ratio 0.65 0.52 0.37 0.74 Control Delay 30.7 8.8 7.3 21.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 30.7 8.8 7.3 21.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 62 36 59 110 Queue Length 95th (ft) #130 51 68 115 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 948 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 Base Capacity (vph) 377 533 2033 1147 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.55 0.50 0.33 0.64 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 55 Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. splits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd t02 04 12s l IS s * l05 7 06 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y '� tt tT Volume (vph) 62 130 198 493 416 96 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.97 At Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1588 1752 3195 3101 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.25 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1588 454 3195 3101 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.74 0.74 0.70 0.70 Adj. Flow (vph) 67 141 268 666 594 137 RTOR Reduction (vph) 12 0 0 0 34 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 196 0 268 666 697 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 3% 13% 15% 5% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.6 31.2 31.2 16.9 Effective Green, g (s) 10.6 31.2 31.2 16.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.57 0.57 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 307 490 1819 956 v/s Ratio Prot c0.12 c0.10 0.21 c0.22 v/s Ratio Perm 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.55 0.37 0.73 Uniform Delay, dl 20.3 6.8 6.4 16.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 4.3 1.3 0.1 2.8 Delay (s) 24.6 8.0 6.5 19.7 Level of Service C A A B Approach Delay (s) 24.6 7.0 19.7 Approach LOS C A B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 13.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service B HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.66 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 54.8 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 • 0 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 3 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing AM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 * Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r '� Tt Volume (vph) 50 118 573 67 146 400 Lane Group Flow (vph) 56 131 796 93 206 563 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 28 1 6 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 Total Split (%) 21.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None v/c Ratio 0.22 Control Delay 22.4 Queue Delay 0.0 Total Delay 22.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 13 Queue Length 95th (ft) 46 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 Base Capacity (vph) 305 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 47.2 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated 6 81 2 28 1 6 12.0 5.0 12.0 17.0 10.0 18.0 32.0 15.0 47.0 53.3% 25.0% 78.3% 4.0 4.0 5.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lag Lead Min None Min 0.21 0.55 0.08 0.40 0.25 4.7 12.5 1.1 5.5 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.7 12.5 1.1 5.5 3.8 3 86 0 17 28 32 105 6 26 35 2215 948 325 500 648 1949 1143 609 2829 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.20 0.41 0.08 0.34 0.20 c..l{fo ­4 Phococ• r• Rnnfo F,)g R, liiefac nr 11;_01 f p2 08 15s s 1 06 7 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 • 10 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing AM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r tt Volume (veh/h) 50 118 573 67 146 400 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1727 1863 1863 1681 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 56 131 796 93 206 563 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.72 0.72 0.71 0.71 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 10 2 2 13 Cap, veh/h 192 343 1395 844 515 2048 Arrive On Green 0.11 0.11 0.42 0.42 0.11 0.64 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3368 1583 1774 3279 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 56 131 796 93 206 563 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1774 1583 1641 1583 1774 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.2 3.0 7.7 1.2 2.3 3.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.2 3.0 7.7 1.2 2.3 3.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 192 343 1395 844 515 2048 V/C Ratio(X) 0.29 0.38 0.57 0.11 0.40 0.27 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 339 474 2156 1211 767 3167 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.2 14.0 9.1 4.8 5.8 3.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.8 0.7 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/pile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 0.6 1.3 3.5 0.7 1.2 1.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 18.0 14.7 9.5 4.9 6.3 3.3 LnGrp LOS B B A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 187 889 769 Approach Delay, s/veh 15.7 9.0 4.1 Approach LOS B A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.0 23.3 32.3 9.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 10.5 ' 28 41.5 8.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.3 9.7 5.2 5.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.3 8.1 10.6 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.7 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes ' HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 0 0 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y '� Tt tT Volume (vph) 121 229 543 593 Lane Group Flow (vph) 616 239 566 762 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 12.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 20.0 20.0 Total Split (s) 37.0 13.2 43.0 29.8 Total Split (%) 46.3% 16.5% 53.8% 37.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None Min Min v/c Ratio 0.94 0.76 0.38 0.83 Control Delay 47.9 30.6 15.6 35.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 47.9 30.6 15.6 35.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 282 68 95 178 Queue Length 95th (ft) #400 #161 134 #250 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 956 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 300 Base Capacity (vph) 687 316 1561 988 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.76 0.36 0.77 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 77.1 Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. ens1' ­1 okoo A• P-do r99 R. Pnnormill Pri tp2 04 s 7 s +� 1 05 06 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 • Ll Freedom Manor 2014 Existing PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y tt 0 Volume (vph) 121 372 229 543 593 123 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1653 1752 3374 3329 Fit Permitted 0.99 0.17 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1653 320 3374 3329 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.80 0.80 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 151 465 239 566 631 131 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 0 0 0 22 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 607 0 239 566 740 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 1% 3% 7% 6% 4% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 30.1 33.9 33.9 20.7 Effective Green, g (s) 30.1 33.9 33.9 20.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.44 0.44 0.27 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 646 302 1485 894 v/s Ratio Prot c0.37 c0.09 0.17 0.22 v/s Ratio Perm c0.26 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.79 0.38 0.83 Uniform Delay, dl 22.6 15.7 14.5 26.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 21.5 13.2 0.2 6.4 Delay (s) 44.0 28.9 14.7 32.8 Level of Service D C B C Approach Delay (s) 44.0 18.9 32.8 Approach LOS D B C Intersection Summa HCM 2000 Control Delay 30.9 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.90 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 77.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 • 0 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 3 Freedom Manor 2014 Existing PM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Tt r tt Volume (vph) 41 70 702 39 95 870 Lane Group Flow (vph) 46 78 731 41 108 989 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 81 2 2 8 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 12.0 5.0 12.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 17.0 10.0 18.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 33.0 13.0 46.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 55.0% 21.7% 76.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None Min None Min v/c Ratio 0.16 0.12 0.43 0.04 0.20 0.42 Control Delay 19.1 3.6 11.1 1.3 4.2 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.1 3.6 11.1 1.3 4.2 5.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 0 71 0 8 55 Queue Length 95th (ft) 36 19 125 6 21 94 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 956 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 500 Base Capacity (vph) 385 623 2350 1174 598 3200 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.12 0.13 0.31 0.03 0.18 0.31 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 42.4 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Splits and Phases: 5: Route 522*& Justes Dr 11;_0 1 1 I'a2 13 S 6 as 1 06 4 Timings WC Synchro 8 Report Page 4 11 • Freedom Manor 2014 Existing PM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tT r '� tt Volume (veh/h) 41 70 702 39 95 870 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1792 1863 1863 1827 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 46 78 731 41 108 989 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.96 0.96 0.88 0.88 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 6 2 2 4 Cap, veh/h 163 281 1567 874 543 2272 Arrive On Green 0.09 0.09 0.46 0.46 0.09 0.65 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3495 1583 1774 3563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 46 78 731 41 108 989 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1703 1583 1774 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 1.0 1.8 6.1 0.5 1.1 5.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 1.0 1.8 6.1 0.5 1.1 5.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 163 281 1567 874 543 2272 V/C Ratio(X) 0.28 0.28 0.47 0.05 0.20 0.44 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 386 480 2345 1235 755 3396 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 17.5 14.7 7.7 4.3 4.6 3.5 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/vile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 0.5 0.8 2.9 0.3 0.5 2.7 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 18.5 15.3 7.9 4.3 4.7 3.6 LnGrp LOS B B A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 124 772 1097 Approach Delay, s/veh 16.4 7.7 3.7 Approach LOS B A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 8.1 24.5 32.6 8.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 8.5 ' 29 40.5 9.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 3.1 8.1 7.7 3.8 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.1 10.9 13.8 0.1 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 6.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 D. Background Development Distributions and Assignments C CJ % _ SO'% (Retail) ♦- 100% (Resid.) ilk Ar 50% (Retail) Entrance `hdison Viiiage IMP (Resld.) sty z ,e 9 V� 20% C" LEGEND T BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT STUDY INTERSECTIONS ite TURNfNG MOVEMENTS 10%10'k� Inbound % Outbound % 55% Madison Village Approximate Site w Boundan d f I j ' � I Wit J 2 r l L. _ ._ 1 SUE {toad (,44) 25% L x Q. RI e W. v; a ti z Madison Wiggle Entrance .t 6. ry M W1 N N z Paperinill Road (Route 644) t FREEDOM MANOR 2020/2026 MADISON VILLAGE FIGURE D 1 TRAFFIC' IMPAC'7 STUUY TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS DIRX104 w/o 1NTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA fXmsl T-vyj ` a 4 L r ri ' = %126(104) ♦n 6312461 2 3 ilk Ar 126 (104) 4T4-3-0-1 Entrance "`�°����� Madison Village 7,270 *Madison 3 (gl Village 260 (131) t�lol� 5 t81 y v Appruxitrtate Site _ Boundary Q a, I SITE SITE � � 1 ( pa nill g�,uJ l �xtte t r L -7 i -} t ry 2{. r r. r LEGEND ',J STUDY INTERSECTIONS Itf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AM(PM) WEEKDAYADT 01Q, l3i Y a r u P e eY Madison Village s Entrance 297(157)00 243(12x)� T y x aor. ow Pq)ermill Road Q .. (Ruute 644) 63(91)NO Drive O ry lustes Drive tf Y :L N � a � e oG li FREEDOM MANOR 2020 MADISON VILLAGE FIGURE D2 TPU%f IC IMPACT STUD) TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS 9"01,r464 w.%o INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK ODIMTY, VA thrf,�».'Yir, 0 0 u ^� �vp kad Entrance n Village +1,190 t� + `V n II +2J0 Madison Village Approximate Site Boundary y O 0 I SITE r- i I SITF LEGEND a STUDY INTERSECTIONS MeTURNING MOVEMENTS 100( 100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,1)00 WEEKDAYADT N ill tAM Road 1 CL N 7 L v Madisuo Village Entrance +52(+--12 ) +S3(+27) x O 2 oG Papermill Rudd 2 .r (Route 644 ) t iusles Drive FREEDOM MANOR 202012026 MADISON VILLAGE FIGURE D3 TR,%FFIC lNll'acT Srtjnr' PASS -BY ASSIGNMENTS FREDERICK COUNTY. VA 35 2 3; Entranuc; Madison Village Appro!umaie Site f Boundary 11 cL l' A 15% iITF - r- - 1 a. z Papermill Raid 1 - j' (Route 64-l) 15"., � y y. pspe"nill goad lRoutc� q l Nigh School w Y r t� LEGEND r tf ak BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT a _ - STUDY INTERSECTIONS ltr TURNING MOVEMENTS ' n 50� l���N��� - 10%10% loboond % Color, r; 1 � � s r1 W Y� x� cx FREEDOM MANOR 202012026 HIGH SCHOOL TRAFFIC FIGURE D4 • � TILAf•F1C IMPACTSTI;DI DISTRIBUTIONS FREDERICK C0t1HTY, VA "' '' Madison Village 0 Itfwo 11 730 1 1 730 1 i Approximate Site Boundary x x T ` � x SITE t r_J � sITF i 730 L Pa erntll Ridoutc b i41 320 I LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTIONS NYTURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) l,(N)tl WEEKDAYADT Gu Y ry O x� Madison Village It Entrance 0 1 L N _ � � r T 7 L C Y f'alx rntill Road I Ruule t,44 i a Just,%ntt, High School t•! (3 x $6443) 86 (43) Justes Dn,. c 0. T p[ .L W- r� a x e � — 2LU FREEDOM MANOR 202012026 HIGH SCHOOL FIGURE D5 TRAFFIC IMPACTSTUDI TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS FREDEFACK COUNTY, VA IA 4f 14 E o - L s S11!b (Retail) ilk jr A. %(Retail) Entrance Aladisun �'`illabr I *4% I Resid.I t0 _ ro 20% I S% Sitr [ntnutce LEGEND BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT STUDYlNTERSECTIONS It t r TURNING MOVEMENTS 10%10% Inbound % Outbound % 55% Madison Village AppRimmatc Sm y Boundary 3 0 aG u x i, 1 i SITE S y (` ;7 J �_• •_�_. ' ' �•_� C SITE 1 J 0 Road (14A) 25% Y_ G ry N v G � Madison Village it Entrance 551, X 9 y� h 4 - PaperntillRoad (Route 6411 5% 11111110 v `V,:, Ir; . �, jJustes Drne tf Y i r4 T r W, o .. LAt � FREEDOM MANOR 2026 MADISON VILLAGE FIGURE D6 In WA( POP \( I w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION t,fn,,.,4lw t•REOERIO( COUNTY, VA arrA'104 • C� %101184) {1 /1971 ilk Ar 101 (84) 1.5401 Entratue !Madison Villagc 5,820 39(291EP Itf IOA(IOS1�� 39INI M n a — N m ae % _ At (33) 2704) Entrant tSitc 'J r 7 i r cs a — a 1,820 y Madison T Village r-i Approxuttatc �iic ,^ Boundary OG O I x SITE J r_ � I 1 �•.> Pa�Rnill�l Road lR"utc q 73n LEGEND '`�1 J STUDY INTERSECTIONS I tf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM{PMJ 1,MN1 WEEKDAYADT N I �J L Y ~ T� 7 y r �z ?Madison Village � Entrance 297(157).0 1 t 135(71) v r a Y L ram( R Y ! yl Pa(xtmill Rwd T t I Route ta-1 ) 16 l:31 „(141 — �1 Justes Dme ■ r+ _ v oC FREEDOM MANOR 2026 MADISON VILLAGE FIGURE D7 TR.NI FIC IMPACT STUDN TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS wl IN TERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDEt11CK COUNTY, VA ' E. 2020 Background Conditions - S"ynchro Worksheets • Freedom Manor 2020 Background AM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial /Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection i Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 293 .438 207 207 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 299 447 211 211 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 397 9 501 261 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 75 703 195 195 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #Ih 0 0 0 0 Fed Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.9 7.4 9.3 6.8 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left - Left Left Left r Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 299 447 211 211 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 760 1120 685 870 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.979 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 293 438 207 207 Cap Entry, veh/h 745 1096 672 854 V/C Ratio 0.394 0.399 0.308 0.242 Control Delay, s/veh 9.9 7.4 9.3 6.8 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2020 Background AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� tT tt r Volume (vph) 349 286 181 627 640 222 Lane Group Flow (vph) 379 311 197 682 696 241 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 29.0 14.0 41.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 41.4% 41.4% 20.0% 58.6% 38.6% 38.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.77 0.47 0.46 0.37 0.54 0.32 Control Delay 33.4 4.8 7.3 5.1 19.9 4.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.4 4.8 7.3 5.1 19.9 4.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 0 16 28 123 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 221 48 m43 m91 190 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 328 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 225 275 Base Capacity (vph) 606 747 442 1860 1300 758 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.42 0.45 0.37 0.54 0.32 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 51 (73%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2020 Background AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� tt tt r Volume (veh/h) 349 286 181 627 640 222 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1696 1776 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 379 311 197 682 696 241 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 12 7 2 Cap, veh/h 451 403 434 1943 1504 706 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.17 1.00 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3308 3463 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 311 197 682 696 241 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1774 1612 1687 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 12.8 4.0 0.0 10.1 7.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 12.8 4.0 0.0 10.1 7.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 451 403 434 1943 1504 706 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.77 0.45 0.35 0.46 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 608 543 510 1943 1504 706 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.80 0.80 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.7 24.2 8.3 0.0 13.6 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 4.8 0.6 0.4 1.0 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 7.9 11.0 1.9 0.1 4.9 3.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.5 29.0 8.9 0.4 14.6 14.0 LnGrp LOS C C A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 690 879 937 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.9 2.3 14.4 Approach LOS C A B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.2 22.8 11.0 36.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.0 24.0 9.0 22.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 2.0 16.2 6.0 12.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.4 1.6 0.1 6.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.7 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 • 9 Freedom Manor 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 2020 Background AM 7/29/2015 T 1 Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y '� tt tT Volume (vph) 131 242 678 718 Lane Group Flow (vph) 356 263 737 1012 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 22.0 13.2 48.0 34.8 Total Split (%) 31.4% 18.9% 68.6% 49.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min vlc Ratio 0.91 0.75 0.40 0.81 Control Delay 55.5 25.8 6.4 19.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.5 25.8 6.4 19.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 144 74 120 234 Queue Length 95th (ft) #298 #130 20 #283 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 933 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 Base Capacity (vph) 395 354 1854 1259 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.74 0.40 0.80 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 15 (21 %), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 0..M 4 O6.,­A• D-ifn f;')) R Donormill Rri Tp2 R p4 As s 22 s o5 I T 06 R 13.2s Is Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 • i Freedom Manor 2020 Background AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 t ---* 4\ T 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tT Volume (vph) 131 197 242 678 718 213 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.97 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1600 1752 3195 3093 At Permitted 0.98 0.15 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1600 277 3195 3093 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 142 214 263 737 780 232 RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 0 0 0 40 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 345 0 263 737 972 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 3% 13% 15% 5% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 16.7 40.3 40.3 27.3 Effective Green, g (s) 16.7 40.3 40.3 27.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.58 0.58 0.39 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 381 338 1839 1206 v/s Ratio Prot c0.22 c0.09 0.23 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm c0.35 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.78 0.40 0.81 Uniform Delay, dl 25.9 10.6 8.2 19.0 Progression Factor 1.00 1.30 0.70 0.73 Incremental Delay, d2 24.1 9.9 0.6 5.2 Delay (s) 49.9 23.7 6.3 19.1 Level of Service D C A B Approach Delay (s) 49.9 10.9 19.1 Approach LOS D B B Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 20.3 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.86 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.0% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 E Freedom Manor 2020 Background AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 i 0 Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2020 Background AM 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r Tt r '� tT Volume (vph) 141 215 705 256 343 572 Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 234 766 278 373 622 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 29.8 23.2 53.0 Total Split(%) 24.3% 42.6% 33.1% 75.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min v/c Ratio 0.59 0.36 0.49 0.24 0.65 0.28 Control Delay 37.0 11.0 15.5 1.4 5.9 2.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.0 11.0 15.5 1.4 5.9 2.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 49 111 0 2 2 Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 77 198 25 m56 m45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 933 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 450 Base Capacity (vph) 303 762 1556 1213 687 2243 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.31 0.49 0.23 0.54 0.28 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 61 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. C..III, ­1 Dkoo c;• Q-to r,)g k Inetne nr 11701 �q 2 R A .2s 8s 1 as R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 CJ E Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2020 Background AM 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r TT r tt Volume (veh/h) 141 215 705 256 343 572 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1727 1863 1863 1681 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 153 234 766 278 373 622 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 10 2 2 13 Cap, vehlh 277 444 1657 1047 515 2217 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.51 0.51 0.04 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3368 1583 1774 3279 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 153 234 766 278 373 622 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1641 1583 1774 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 8.7 10.5 5.1 5.9 11.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 8.7 10.5 5.1 5.9 11.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 277 444 1657 1047 515 2217 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.53 0.46 0.27 0.72 0.28 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 304 469 1657 1047 768 2217 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 0.48 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.3 21.3 11.2 4.9 10.2 12.6 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 1.8 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.9 0.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 2.9 3.9 4.9 3.3 4.3 5.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 29.0 22.2 12.1 5.5 11.1 12.7 LnGrp LOS C C B A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 387 1044 995 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.9 10.4 12.1 Approach LOS C B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 40.9 54.1 15.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ` 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.7 ' 25 47.5 12.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 7.9 12.5 13.2 10.7 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.8 7.3 11.8 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.4 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SIB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, vehlh 160 575 129 129 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 163 586 131 131 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 274 24 270 443 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 300 377 167 167 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 9.7 5.8 7.0 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left I Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 163 586 131 131 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 859 1103 863 726 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.983 0.981 0.985 0.985 Flow Entry, veh/h 160 575 129 129 Cap Entry, veh/h 844 1082 849 714 VIC Ratio 0.190 0.531 0.152 0.181 Control Delay, s/veh 6.2 9.7 5.8 7.0 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 3 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations '� r tt TT r Volume (vph) 189 155 238 722 769 290 Lane Group Flow (vph) 205 168 256 776 818 309 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 32.0 26.0 78.0 52.0 Total Split (%) 29.1% 29.1% 23.6% 70.9% 47.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.71 0.42 0.51 0.30 0.39 Control Delay 56.6 9.0 16.2 5.4 13.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.6 9.0 16.2 5.4 13.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 138 0 84 80 145 Queue Length 95th (ft) 205 55 m104 m65 239 Internal Link Dist (ft) 338 2281 781 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 225 Base Capacity (vph) 434 515 625 2563 2077 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.33 0.41 0.30 0.39 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 4 (4%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. cnrtn ­4 Phocoe• I. Rnian r,ii R AAnrfignn Villnn? FnrrAnCA 5.0 10.0 52.0 47.3% 4.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 Lag C-Min 0.29 2.3 0.0 2.3 0 43 275 1078 0 0 0 0.29 T02 R p4 2s 05 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations '� �' tt tt r Volume (veh/h) 189 155 238 722 769 290 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlh/In 1863 1863 1863 1810 1810 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 205 168 256 776 818 309 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 5 5 2 Cap, veh/h 248 221 463 2646 2244 1033 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 1.00 0.65 0.65 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3529 3529 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 205 168 256 776 818 309 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1774 1719 1719 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.4 11.2 5.3 0.0 11.9 9.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.4 11.2 5.3 0.0 11.9 9.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 248 221 463 2646 2244 1033 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.76 0.55 0.29 0.36 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 435 389 675 2646 2244 1033 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.60 0.60 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.0 45.6 5.6 0.0 8.7 8.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.9 5.3 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),vehlln 6.5 9.8 2.6 0.1 5.7 4.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.0 50.9 6.2 0.2 9.2 9.0 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 373 1032 1127 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.0 1.7 9.1 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 89.6 20.4 12.9 76.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 73.0 27.0 21.0 47.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 2.0 14.4 7.3 13.9 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 16.8 1.0 0.6 14.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.4 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 9 Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 } 4\ t Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT 1 Lane Configurations y '� tt tT Volume (vph) 223 263 737 747 Lane Group Flow (vph) 696 274 768 998 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 50.0 18.4 60.0 41.6 Total Split (%) 45.5% 16.7% 54.5% 37.8% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 1.02 0.93 0.48 0.96 Control Delay 71.5 63.7 14.9 46.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.5 63.7 14.9 46.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) -516 138 188 353 Queue Length 95th (ft) #747 #283 114 #461 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 960 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 Base Capacity (vph) 684 294 1610 1047 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.02 0.93 0.48 0.95 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. iplits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd t02 R 04 SOS SOS 4\ 05 06 R 4 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 • i Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y tt tT Volume (vph) 223 418 263 737 747 191 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1663 1752 3374 3314 At Permitted 0.98 0.10 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1663 192 3374 3314 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 242 454 274 768 795 203 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 0 0 0 21 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 687 0 274 768 977 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 1% 3% 7% 6% 4% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.7 52.3 52.3 33.9 Effective Green, g (s) 44.7 52.3 52.3 33.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.48 0.48 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 675 288 1604 1021 v/s Ratio Prot c0.41 c0.12 0.23 0.29 v/s Ratio Perm c0.33 v/c Ratio 1.02 0.95 0.48 0.96 Uniform Delay, dl 32.6 30.7 19.6 37.3 Progression Factor 1.00 0.97 0.70 0.73 Incremental Delay, d2 39.2 38.6 1.0 18.8 Delay (s) 71.9 68.3 14.7 46.1 Level of Service E E B D Approach Delay (s) 71.9 28.8 46.1 Approach LOS E C D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 46.1 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.01 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 E 9 Freedom Manor 2020 Background PM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT i Lane Configurations r TT r '� tt Volume (vph) 88 120 881 81 142 1023 Lane Group Flow (vph) 96 130 918 84 154 1112 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 28 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 81 2 28 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 24.0 65.0 21.0 86.0 Total Split (%) 21.8% 59.1% 19.1% 78.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min v/c Ratio 0.53 0.30 0.38 0.06 0.32 0.40 Control Delay 56.8 9.1 7.8 0.4 3.0 3.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.8 9.1 7.8 0.4 3.0 3.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 6 122 0 20 103 Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 51 192 6 m14 m71 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 960 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 450 Base Capacity (vph) 305 544 2388 1462 590 2784 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.24 0.38 0.06 0.26 0.40 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 16 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. iplits and Phases: b: Koute b22 & ,lustes ur 1_01 �02 R US 165S 1 06 R p8 169 145 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 • 1 J Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2020 Background PM 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT I Lane Configurations r tt r tT Volume (veh/h) 88 120 881 81 142 1023 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1792 1863 1863 1827 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 96 130 918 84 154 1112 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 6 2 2 4 Cap, veh/h 175 227 2452 1296 491 2798 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.09 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3495 1583 1774 3563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 130 918 84 154 1112 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In 1774 1583 1703 1583 1774 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 8.4 11.4 1.1 2.4 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 8.4 11.4 1.1 2.4 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 175 227 2452 1296 491 2798 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.57 0.37 0.06 0.31 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 306 345 2452 1296 677 2798 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.19 0.19 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.2 43.9 5.9 1.9 3.8 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 2.3 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 2.9 3.8 5.4 0.8 1.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.9 46.2 6.3 2.0 3.8 0.1 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 226 1002 1266 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 6.0 0.5 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 84.7 94.2 15.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 ' 61 80.5 19.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.4 13.4 2.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.3 20.6 23.6 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Background (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8l4/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations r tt 0 Volume (vph) 131 197 242 678 718 Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 214 263 737 1012 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 14.0 14.0 46.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 23.3% 76.7% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.62 0.37 0.61 0.36 0.73 Control Delay 37.9 10.3 12.3 2.5 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.9 10.3 12.3 2.5 8.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 49 31 5 9 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) #113 74 53 14 53 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 933 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 350 Base Capacity (vph) 240 594 454 2071 1381 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.36 0.58 0.36 0.73 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 20 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Solits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Paoermill Rd ?p2 R _e p4 s 14 s .1 t 05 06 R J 14s I Elm I; Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 Freedom Manor 2020 Background (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt tT Volume (veh/h) 131 197 242 678 718 213 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1776 1776 1845 1681 1686 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 142 214 263 737 780 232 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 7 3 13 15 15 Cap, veh/h 240 371 390 2050 1127 335 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.03 0.21 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1691 1509 1757 3279 2519 724 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 142 214 263 737 513 499 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/In 1691 1509 1757 1597 1601 1558 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.7 7.5 4.1 11.8 18.2 18.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.7 7.5 4.1 11.8 18.2 18.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 240 371 390 2050 741 721 V/C Ratio(X) 0.59 0.58 0.67 0.36 0.69 0.69 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 240 371 486 2050 741 721 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.82 0.82 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.1 19.9 12.4 13.1 21.4 21.4 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 3.9 2.2 2.3 0.4 4.3 4.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 2.5 6A 2.5 5.4 9.0 8.8 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.0 22.1 14.7 13.6 25.7 25.8 LnGrp LOS C C B B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 356 1000 1012 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.5 13.9 25.8 Approach LOS C B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.0 14.0 10.7 35.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.5 8.5 9.5 24.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 13.8 9.5 6.1 20.2 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.7 0.0 0.2 3.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 20.5 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 • • Freedom Manor 2020 Background (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 4\ T Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT I Lane Configurations r tt 0 Volume (vph) 223 418 263 737 747 Lane Group Flow (vph) 242 454 274 768 998 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 17.8 13.8 42.2 28.4 Total Split (%) 29.7% 23.0% 70.3% 47.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.71 0.65 0.70 0.39 0.81 Control Delay 35.5 17.1 18.6 4.8 12.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 35.5 17.1 18.6 4.8 12.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 82 106 41 109 15 Queue Length 95th (ft) #171 194 #83 20 #47 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 960 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 350 Base Capacity (vph) 352 696 405 1968 1238 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.69 0.65 0.68 0.39 0.81 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. >plits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd -- 02 R • p4 t U-2 s 17.8 s 05 06 R 4 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 9 Freedom Manor 2020 Background (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 81412015 4\ t 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Tt tT Volume (vehlh) 223 418 263 737 747 191 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1810 1881 1845 1776 1799 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 242 454 274 768 795 203 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 1 3 7 6 6 Cap, veh/h 353 521 386 1951 1033 264 Arrive On Green 0.20 0.20 0.12 0.58 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1723 1599 1757 3463 2788 689 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 242 454 274 768 504 494 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1723 1599 1757 1687 1709 1678 Q Serve(g_s), s 7.8 12.3 5.1 7.5 17.1 17.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 7.8 12.3 5.1 7.5 17.1 17.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 Lane Grp Cap(c), vehlh 353 521 386 1951 654 642 V/C Ratio(X) 0.68 0.87 0.71 0.39 0.77 0.77 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 353 521 447 1951 654 642 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 0.82 0.82 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 22.1 19.1 12.2 6.9 23.7 23.7 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 5.4 15.0 3.9 0.5 7.1 7.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/ln 4.2 14.7 2.8 3.6 9.4 9.3 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 27.5 34.0 16.1 7.4 30.7 30.9 LnGrp LOS C C B A C C Approach Vol, veh/h 696 1042 998 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.7 9.7 30.8 Approach LOS C A C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 42.2 17.8 11.7 30.5 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 34.7 12.3 9.3 20.9 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 9.5 14.3 7.1 19.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.9 0.0 0.2 1.5 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 23.0 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 0 E 2020 Total Conditions — Synchro & SIDRA Worksheets Freedom Manor 2020 Total (No Roundabout) AM 1: Site Entrance & Papermill Rd 8/7/2015 II Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T4 T Volume (vph) 48 12 455 16 4 328 Pedestrians Ped Button Pedestrian Timing (s) Free Right No No Ideal Flow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Green (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Refr Cycle Length (s) 120 120 120 120 120 120 Volume Combined (vph) 48 12 471 0 4 328 Lane Utilization Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Factor (vph) 0.95 0.85 0.99 0.85 0.95 1.00 Saturated Flow (vph) 1805 1615 1890 0 1805 1900 Ped Intf Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Frequency (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Protected Option Allowed No Yes Yes Reference Time (s) 0.9 29.9 0.0 0.3 20.7 Adj Reference Time (s) 8.0 33.9 0.0 8.0 24.7 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph) 120 1890 120 1900 Reference Time A (s) 47.9 29.9 4.0 20.7 Adj Saturation B (vph NA NA NA NA Reference Time B (s) NA NA NA NA Reference Time (s) 29.9 20.7 Adj Reference Time (s) 33.9 24.7 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s) 3.2 29.9 0.3 20.7 Ref Time Seperate (s) 3.2 28.9 0.3 20.7 Reference Time (s) 3.2 29.9 20.7 20.7 Adj Reference Time (s) 8.0 33.9 24.7 24.7 Summary WB NB SB Combined Protected Option (s) NA 41.9 Permitted Option (s) Err 33.9 Split Option (s) 8.0 58.6 Minimum (s) 8.0 33.9 41.9 Right Turns WBR Adj Reference Time (s) 8.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s) 33.9 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s) 0.0 Combined (s) 41.9 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.9% ICU Level of Service A Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. Intersection Capacity Utilization Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2020 Total (No Roundabout) AM 1: Site Entrance & Papermill Rd 8/7/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, veh/h 48 12 455 16 4 328 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 100 100 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 4 2 2 7 Mvmt Flow 52 13 495 17 4 357 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 i Conflicting Flow All 868 503 0 0 512 0 Stage 1 503 - - - - - Stage 2 365 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 - 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 323 569 1053 Stage 1 607 - - Stage 2 702 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 322 569 1053 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 322 - - - Stage 1 607 Stage 2 699 Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 16.9 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnlWBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) 322 569 1053 HCM Lane WC Ratio 0.162 0.023 0.004 HCM Control Delay (s) 18.3 11.5 8.4 HCM Lane LOS C B A HCM 95th %tile O(veh) 0.6 0.1 0 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 INTERSECTION SUMMARN* 8 Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout Travel Speed (Average) Travel Distance (Total) Travel Time (Total) Demand Flows (Total) Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) Degree of Saturation Practical Spare Capacity Effective Intersection Capacity Control Delay (Total) Control Delay (Average) Control Delay (Worst Lane) Control Delay (Worst Movement) Geometric Delay (Average) Stop -Line Delay (Average) Idling Time (Average) Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 95% Back of Queue - Vehicles (Worst Lane) 95% Back of Queue - Distance (Worst Lane) Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) Total Effective Stops Effective Stop Rate Proportion Queued Performance Index Cost (Total) Fuel Consumption (Total) Carbon Dioxide (Total) Hydrocarbons (Total) Carbon Monoxide (Total) NOx (Total) 34.6 mph 593.1 veh-mi/h 17.1 veh-h/h 938 veh/h 4.8 0.472 80.2 % 1988 veh/h 2.08 veh-h/h 8.0 sec 8.6 sec 8.6 sec 0.0 sec 8.0 sec 7.2 sec LOS A 2.8 veh 72.1 ft 0.06 68 veh/h 0.07 per veh 0.14 24.1 298.83 $/h 27.7 gal/h 249.4 kg/h 0.022 kg/h 0.334 kg/h 0.559 kg/h 34.6 mph 711.7 pers-mi/h 20.6 pers-h/h 1126 pers/h 2.50 pers-h/h 8.0 sec 8.6 sec 82 pers/h 0.07 per pers 0.14 24.1 298.83 $/h Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Demand Flows (Total) 450,261 veh/y 540,313 pers/y Delay 1,000 veh-h/y 1,200 pers-h/y Effective Stops 32,820 veh/y 39,384 pers/y Travel Distance 284,674 veh-mi/y 341,609 pers-mi/y Travel Time 8,226 veh-h/y 9,871 pers-h/y Cost 143,439 $/y 143,439 $/y Fuel Consumption 13,306 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 119,705 kg/y Hydrocarbons 11 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 160 kg/y NOx 268 kg/y Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:49 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Ply Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0 24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com INTERSECTION 6 Project: 0:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom ManofWNALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Pap ermill Road at Site Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC MOVEMENT SUMMARY • 0 8 Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout South: Papermill Road 8 T1 495 3.7 0.472 8.6 LOS A 2.8 72.1 0.06 18 R2 17 3.0 0.472 8.6 LOS A 2.8 72.1 0.06 Approach 512 3.7 0.472 8.6 LOS A 2.8 72.1 0.06 East: Site Entrance 1 L2 52 3.0 0.099 6.6 LOS A 0.3 8.5 0.49 16 R2 13 3.0 0.099 6.6 LOS A 0.3 8.5 0.49 Approach 65 3.0 0.099 6.6 LOS A 0.3 8.5 0.49 North: Papermill Road 7 L2 4 3.0 0.360 7.4 LOS A 1.7 43.8 0.20 4 T1 357 6.8 0.360 7.4 LOS A 1.7 43.8 0.20 Approach 361 6.8 0.360 7.4 LOS A 1.7 43.8 0.20 All Vehicles 938 4.8 0.472 8.0 LOS A 2.8 72.1 0.14 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 0.01 35.5 0.01 27.8 0.01 35.1 0.45 27.4 0.45 26.8 0.45 27.3 0.09 29.8 0.09 35.7 0.09 35.6 0.07 34.6 Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:49 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Ply Ltd 5 I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com INTERSECTION 6 Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Pap ermill Road at Site Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC LEVEL OF SERVICE ! 4) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection LOS A A A A 1" PaDwrmll Road Paoemull Road Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:49 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\PapermillRoad at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1 PC DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) 7 Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 8.6 6.6 7.4 8.0 LOS A A A A IL 74 74 Papermill Road v ® , 1 tC W Papermill Road 66 86 Colour code based on Level of Service LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Continuous Level of Service Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010) LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Roundabout Level of Service Method: Same as Sign Control HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:49 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\PapermillRoad at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS 11PC DEGREE OF SATURATION* Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (v/c ratio) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 0.47 0.10 0.36 0.47 IL 036 0.36 Papermill Road a� u 1 � W Papermill Road 0.47 047 o,OL 0.10r Colour code based on Degree of Saturation [<0.6] [0.6-0.7] [0.7-0.8] [0.8-0.9] [0.9-1.0] [>1.0] Continuous Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:49 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd 5 I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.. PLUS / 1PC Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 293 438 207 207 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 299 447 211 211 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 397 9 501 261 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 75 703 195 195 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #Ih 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.9 7.4 9.3 6.8 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 299 447 211 211 Cap Entry Lane, vehlh 760 1120 685 870 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.979 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, vehlh 293 438 207 207 Cap Entry, veh/h 745 1096 672 854 V/C Ratio 0.394 0,399 0.308 0,242 Control Delay, s/veh 9.9 7.4 9.3 6.8 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 0 Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 ~`t 41 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt tt r Volume (vph) 349 286 181 654 649 222 Lane Group Flow (vph) 379 311 197 711 705 241 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 29.0 14.0 41.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 41.4% 41.4% 20.0% 58.6% 38.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.77 0.47 0.46 0.38 0.54 Control Delay 33.4 4.8 7.5 5.5 20.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.4 4.8 7.5 5.5 20.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 0 18 33 124 Queue Length 95th (ft) 221 48 m37 m114 193 Internal Link Dist (ft) 346 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 200 Base Capacity (vph) 606 747 439 1860 1300 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.42 0.45 0.38 0.54 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 51 (73%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. its and Phases: 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 4\ 05 ■ 5.0 10.0 27.0 38.6% 4.0 1.0 0.0 5.0 Lag C-Min 0.32 4.1 0.0 4.1 0 45 275 758 0 0 0 0.32 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 0 0 Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 t 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR i Lane Configurations r tt tt r Volume (veh/h) 349 286 181 654 649 222 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1696 1776 1863 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 379 311 197 711 705 241 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 12 7 2 Cap, veh/h 451 403 431 1943 1504 706 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.17 1.00 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3308 3463 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 311 197 711 705 241 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1774 1612 1687 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 12.8 4.0 0.0 10.3 7.0 Cycle 0 Clear(g_c), s 14.2 12.8 4.0 0.0 10.3 7.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 451 403 431 1943 1504 706 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.77 0.46 0.37 0.47 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 608 543 508 1943 1504 706 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.76 0.76 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.7 24.2 8.3 0.0 13.6 12.7 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.7 4.8 0.6 0.4 1.1 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 7.9 11.0 1.9 0.1 4.9 3.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 32.5 29.0 8.9 0.4 14.6 14.0 LnGrp LOS C C A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 690 908 946 Approach Delay, s/veh 30.9 2.3 14.5 Approach LOS C A B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.2 22.8 11.0 36.2 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.0 24.0 9.0 22.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 2.0 16.2 6.0 12.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.8 1.6 0.1 6.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.6 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 0 0 Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y tt tT Volume (vph) 158 249 678 718 Lane Group Flow (vph) 409 271 737 1021 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 24.0 13.0 46.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 34.3% 18.6% 65.7% 47.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.94 0.82 0.42 0.88 Control Delay 58.6 33.4 7.8 24.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.6 33.4 7.8 24.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 166 79 124 238 Queue Length 95th (ft) #334 #163 22 #315 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 966 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 425 Base Capacity (vph) 434 331 1758 1168 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.94 0.82 0.42 0.87 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 16 (23%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd t02 R p4 6 8 4\ 05 I 7 06 R Timings WC Synchro 8 Report Page 5 9 0 Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 4\ Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y '� tt tl� Volume (vph) 158 218 249 678 718 222 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.96 Fit Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Said. Flow (prot) 1603 1752 3195 3091 Fit Permitted 0.98 0.13 1.00 1.00 Said Flow (perm) 1603 247 3195 3091 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 172 237 271 737 780 241 RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 0 0 0 42 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 398 0 271 737 979 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 3% 13% 15% 5% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 18.5 38.5 38.5 25.4 Effective Green, g (s) 18.5 38.5 38.5 25.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 0.55 0.55 0.36 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 423 320 1757 1121 v/s Ratio Prot c0.25 c0.10 0.23 0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.36 v/c Ratio 0.94 0.85 0.42 0.87 Uniform Delay, dl 25.2 13.5 9.2 20.8 Progression Factor 1.00 1.12 0.76 0.76 Incremental Delay, d2 29.2 16.9 0.7 8.5 Delay (s) 54.4 31.9 7.7 24.3 Level of Service D C A C Approach Delay (s) 54.4 14.2 24.3 Approach LOS D B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 25.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.92 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.5% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 • • Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2020 Total AM 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tT r '� tT Volume (vph) 141 215 712 256 343 593 Lane Group Flow (vph) 153 234 774 278 373 645 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 29.8 23.2 53.0 Total Split(%) 24.3% 42.6% 33.1% 75.7% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min v/c Ratio 0.59 0.36 0.50 0.24 0.66 0.29 Control Delay 37.0 11.1 15.6 1.4 4.9 1.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 37.0 11.1 15.6 1.4 4.9 1.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 61 50 113 0 9 3 Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 78 201 25 m26 m22 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 966 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 375 Base Capacity (vph) 303 761 1553 1212 684 2243 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.31 0.50 0.23 0.55 0.29 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 60 (86%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. "�70 1 r"02 R q8 2 s 1 129.8 s 1 06 R 7 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 Freedom Manor 2020 Total AM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r '� tt Volume (veh/h) 141 215 712 256 343 593 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1727 1863 1863 1681 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 153 234 774 278 373 645 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 10 2 2 13 Cap, veh/h 277 444 1657 1047 512 2217 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.51 0.51 0.04 0.23 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 1583 3368 1583 1774 3279 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 153 234 774 278 373 645 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlh/ln 1774 1583 1641 1583 1774 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.6 8.7 10.7 5.1 5.9 11.7 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.6 8.7 10.7 5.1 5.9 11.7 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 277 444 1657 1047 512 2217 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.53 0.47 0.27 0.73 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 304 469 1657 1047 765 2217 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.36 0.36 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 27.3 21.3 11.2 4.9 10.3 12.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 1.8 1.0 0.9 0.6 0.7 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 2.9 3.9 5.1 3.3 4.3 5.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 29.0 22.2 12.2 5.5 11.0 12.9 LnGrp LOS C C B A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 387 1052 1018 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.9 10.4 12.2 Approach LOS C B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.2 40.9 54.1 15.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.7 ' 25 47.5 12.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 7.9 12.7 13.7 10.7 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.8 7.3 12.1 0.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.4 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Total (No Roundabout) PM 1: Site Entrance & Papermill Rd 8/7/2015 f- I- 1 /' '* 1 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT i Lane Configurations t Volume (vph) 27 7 455 46 11 641 Pedestrians Ped Button Pedestrian Timing (s) Free Right No No Ideal Flow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lost Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Minimum Green (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Refr Cycle Length (s) 120 120 120 120 120 120 Volume Combined (vph) 27 7 501 0 11 641 Lane Utilization Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Factor (vph) 0.95 0.85 0.99 0.85 0.95 1.00 Saturated Flow (vph) 1805 1615 1874 0 1805 1900 Ped Intf Time (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Frequency (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00 Protected Option Allowed No Yes Yes Reference Time (s) 0.5 32.1 0.0 0.7 40.5 Adi Reference Time (s) 8.0 36.1 0.0 8.0 44.5 Permitted Option Adj Saturation A (vph) 120 1874 120 1900 Reference Time A (s) 26.9 32.1 11.0 40.5 Adj Saturation B (vph NA NA NA NA Reference Time B (s) NA NA NA NA Reference Time (s) 32.1 40.5 Adj Reference Time (s) 36.1 44.5 Split Option Ref Time Combined (s) 1.8 32.1 0.7 40.5 Ref Time Seperate (s) 1.8 29.1 0.7 40.5 Reference Time (s) 1.8 32.1 40.5 40.5 Adj Reference Time (s) 8.0 36.1 44.5 44.5 Summary WB NB SB Combined Protected Option (s) NA 44.5 Permitted Option (s) Err 44.5 Split Option (s) 8.0 80.6 Minimum (s) 8.0 44.5 52.5 Right Tums WBR Adj Reference Time (s) 8.0 Cross Thru Ref Time (s) 36.1 Oncoming Left Ref Time (s) 0.0 Combined (s) 44.1 Intersection Summary Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.7% ICU Level of Service A Reference Times and Phasing Options do not represent an optimized timing plan. Intersection Capacity Utilization Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2020 Total (No Roundabout) PM 1: Site Entrance & Papermill Rd 8l7/2015 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.7 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Vol, vehlh 27 7 455 46 11 641 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None - None Storage Length 0 100 100 - Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 - 0 Grade, % 0 - 0 - - 0 Peak Hour Factor 92 92 96 96 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 3 2 2 4 MvmtFlow 29 8 474 48 12 697 Major/Minor Minorl Majorl Major2 Conflicting Flow All 1219 498 0 0 522 0 Stage 1 498 - - - - - Stage 2 721 - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 199 572 1044 Stage 1 611 - - - Stage 2 482 - - Platoon blocked, % Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 197 572 1044 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 197 - - Stage 1 611 Stage 2 476 - Approach WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s 23.3 0 0.1 HCM LOS C Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBT NBRWBLnlWBLn2 SBL SBT Capacity (veh/h) 197 572 1044 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.149 0.013 0.011 HCM Control Delay (s) 26.4 11.4 8.5 HCM Lane LOS - D B A HCM 95th °/stile 0(veh) 0.5 0 0 HCM 2010 TWSC Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 INTERSECTION SUMMAR4 0 8 Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout Travel Speed (Average) Travel Distance (Total) Travel Time (Total) Demand Flows (Total) Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) Degree of Saturation Practical Spare Capacity Effective Intersection Capacity Control Delay (Total) Control Delay (Average) Control Delay (Worst Lane) Control Delay (Worst Movement) Geometric Delay (Average) Stop -Line Delay (Average) Idling Time (Average) Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 95% Back of Queue - Vehicles (Worst Lane) 95% Back of Queue - Distance (Worst Lane) Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) Total Effective Stops Effective Stop Rate Proportion Queued Performance Index Cost (Total) Fuel Consumption (Total) Carbon Dioxide (Total) Hydrocarbons (Total) Carbon Monoxide (Total) NOx (Total) 33.2 mph 814.8 veh-mi/h 24.5 veh-h/h 1290 veh/h 3.6 % 0.672 26.6 % 1921 veh/h 4.10 veh-h/h 11.4 sec 13.4 sec 13.4 sec 0.0 sec 11.4 sec 10.2 sec LOS B 5.8 veh 150.3 ft 0.12 104 veh/h 0.08 per veh 0.21 38.1 408.88 $/h 36.3 gal/h 325.8 kg/h 0.030 kg/h 0.453 kg/h 0.603 kg/h 33.2 mph 977.8 pers-mi/h 29.4 pers-h/h 1548 pers/h 4.92 pers-h/h 11.4 sec 13.4 sec 125 pers/h 0.08 per pers 0.21 38.1 408.88 $/h Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Demand Flows (Total) 619,304 veh/y 743,165 pers/y Delay 1,968 veh-h/y 2,361 pers-h/y Effective Stops 50,147 veh/y 60,177 pers/y Travel Distance 391,111 veh-mi/y 469,333 pers-mi/y Travel Time 11,777 veh-h/y 14,133 pers-h/y Cost 196,263 $/y 196,263 $/y Fuel Consumption 17,426 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 156,379 kg/y Hydrocarbons 14 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 217 kg/y NOx 289 kg/y Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:53 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Ply Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: 0:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundaboul.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC MOVEMENT SUMMARY 0 • 8 Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout 8 T1 495 3.4 0.504 9.2 LOS A 3.2 81.4 0.11 18 R2 50 3.0 0.504 9.2 LOS A 3.2 81.4 0.11 Approach 545 3.4 0.504 9.2 LOS A 3.2 81.4 0.11 East: Site Entrance 1 L2 29 3.0 0.056 6.1 LOS A 0.2 4.7 0.48 16 R2 8 3.0 0.056 6.1 LOS A 0.2 4.7 0.48 Approach 37 3.0 0.056 6.1 LOS A 0.2 4.7 0.48 North: Papermill Road 7 L2 12 3.0 0.672 13.4 LOS B 5.8 150.3 0.27 4 T1 697 3.9 0.672 13.4 LOS B 5.8 150.3 0.27 Approach 709 3.9 0.672 13.4 LOS B 5.8 150.3 0.27 All Vehicles 1290 3.6 0.672 11.4 LOS B 5.8 150.3 0.21 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010), Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 0.03 35.1 0.03 27.5 0.03 34.2 0.42 27.5 0.42 27.0 0.42 27.4 0.10 27.6 0.10 32.9 0.10 32.8 0.08 33.2 Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:53 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com INTERSECTION 6 Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Pap ermill Road at Site Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC LEVEL OF SERVICE 0 0 V Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection LOS A A B B 1 IN Paperm+Il Road Paoer.n 11 P.oad Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday. July 29, 2015 3:09:53 PM Copyright 0 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www,sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\PapermillRoad at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1 PC DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) V Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 9.2 6.1 13.4 11.4 LOS A A B B IL 134 134 Papermill Road Papermill Road 92 92 Colour code based on Level of Service -0_-0 LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Continuous Level of Service Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010) LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Roundabout Level of Service Method: Same as Sign Control HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:53 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL11404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTI CAL\CALC U LATI ONS\S I D RA\Paperm ill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC DEGREE OF SATURATIONS Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (v/c ratio) ® Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 0.50 0.06 0.67 0.67 IL 067 0.67 Papermill Road a� v w Papermill Road OM 050 Colour code based on Degree of Saturation [<0.6] [0.6-0.7] [0.7-0.8] [0.8-0.9] [0.9-1.0] [>1.0] Continuous Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:53 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: O:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\PapermillRoad at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.. PLUS / 1PC 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Total PM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB { Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 160 575 129 129 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 163 586 131 131 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 274 24 270 443 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 300 377 167 167 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.2 9.7 5.8 7.0 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 163 586 131 131 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 859 1103 863 726 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.983 0.981 0.985 0.985 Flow Entry, veh/h 160 575 129 129 Cap Entry, veh/h 844 1082 849 714 V/C Ratio 0.190 0.531 0.152 0.181 Control Delay, s/veh 6.2 9.7 5.8 7.0 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 3 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Total PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� tt tT r Volume (vph) 189 155 238 738 794 290 Lane Group Flow (vph) 205 168 256 794 845 309 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 26.0 79.0 53.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 28.2% 28.2% 23.6% 71.8% 48.2% 48.2% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.71 0.42 0.52 0.31 0.41 Control Delay 56.6 9.0 16.8 6.1 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.6 9.0 16.8 6.1 13.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 138 0 86 90 152 Queue Length 95th (ft) 205 55 m106 m73 249 Internal Link Dist (ft) 328 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 275 Base Capacity (vph) 418 502 613 2563 2077 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.33 0.42 0.31 0.41 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 2 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. n_r _ -_A nC....,.... 4. o,. f- COO 4. KA-4; n M11 o FMr-o C-Min 0.29 2.3 0.0 2.3 0 43 275 1078 0 0 0 0.29 10ZR l04 S 31 s 4\ 05 I • 06 R J 265 1 153$ 11 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2020 Total PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 4\ t 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� tt tt r Volume (veh/h) 189 155 238 738 794 290 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1810 1810 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 205 168 256 794 845 309 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 5 5 2 Cap, veh/h 247 221 454 2647 2245 1034 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 1.00 0.65 0.65 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3529 3529 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 205 168 256 794 845 309 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1774 1583 1774 1719 1719 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.4 11.2 5.3 0.0 12.4 9.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.4 11.2 5.3 0.0 12.4 9.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 221 454 2647 2245 1034 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.76 0.56 0.30 0.38 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 419 374 666 2647 2245 1034 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 1.00 0.56 0.56 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.1 45.6 5.7 0.0 8.8 8.2 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 7.0 5.4 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),vehlln 6.5 9.8 2.6 0.1 6.0 4.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.1 51.0 6.3 0.2 9.3 9.0 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 373 1050 1154 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.1 1.7 9.2 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 89.7 20.3 12.9 76.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 74.0 26.0 21.0 48.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 2.0 14.4 7.3 14.4 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 17.6 1.0 0.6 14.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.3 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 0 0 Freedom Manor 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 2020 Total PM 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y '� tT TT Volume (vph) 238 283 737 747 Lane Group Flow (vph) 726 295 768 1026 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 50.0 18.7 60.0 41.3 Total Split (%) 45.5% 17.0% 54.5% 37.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 1.07 0.99 0.48 0.99 Control Delay 85.7 76.2 14.7 52.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 85.7 76.2 14.7 52.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) -562 156 188 367 Queue Length 95th (ft) #796 #316 111 #486 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2355 955 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 425 Base Capacity (vph) 681 298 1610 1039 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.07 0.99 0.48 0.99 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 110 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Cnlilc nnri Phncoc• d• Rnnta 577 P Pnnarmill Rri 02 R .1# 04 S 50 S 4\ 05 06 R 7 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 • 0 Freedom Manor 2020 Total PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 4l * I Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT 'SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y '� tt t') Volume (vph) 238 430 283 737 747 217 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.97 At Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1664 1752 3374 3305 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.10 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1664 193 3374 3305 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 259 467 295 768 795 231 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 0 0 0 24 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 717 0 295 768 1002 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 1% 3% 7% 6% 4% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.5 52.5 52.5 33.8 Effective Green, g (s) 44.5 52.5 52.5 33.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.48 0.48 0.31 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 673 293 1610 1015 v/s Ratio Prot c0.43 c0.13 0.23 0.30 v/s Ratio Perm c0.35 v/c Ratio 1.07 1.01 0.48 0.99 Uniform Delay, dl 32.8 32.1 19.5 37.9 Progression Factor 1.00 0.95 0.70 0.73 Incremental Delay, d2 53.5 52.8 1.0 24.4 Delay (s) 86.2 83.2 14.5 51.9 Level of Service F F B D Approach Delay (s) 86.2 33.6 51.9 Approach LOS F C D Intersection Summary I HCM 2000 Control Delay 53.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.06 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 • s Freedom Manor 2020 Total PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Total PM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 + Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r tt Volume (vph) 88 120 901 81 142 1034 Lane Group Flow (vph) 96 130 939 84 154 1124 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase R R 1 2 2 8 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 Total Split (s) 23.0 66.0 21.0 Total Split(%) 20.9% 60.0% 19.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None v/c Ratio 0.53 0.30 0.39 0.06 0.32 Control Delay 56.8 9.4 7.9 0.4 3.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.8 9.4 7.9 0.4 3.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 7 126 0 24 Queue Length 95th (ft) 115 52 197 6 m13 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 375 Base Capacity (vph) 289 540 2388 1448 582 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.24 0.39 0.06 0.26 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 15 (14%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Q Pf ­4 D{.oc r. Rnufo R. Jncfae nr 5.0 10.5 87.0 79.1 % 5.0 0.5 0.0 5.5 C-Min 0.40 4.2 0.0 4.2 121 m72 955 2784 0 0 0 0.40 ";701 �02 R 08 211s s in T 06 R 67s 5 1 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 0 0 Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2020 Total PM 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r '� tT Volume (veh/h) 88 120 901 81 142 1034 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, vehlhlln 1863 1863 1792 1863 1863 1827 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 96 130 939 84 154 1124 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 6 2 2 4 Cap, vehlh 174 227 2453 1296 482 2799 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.06 1.00 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 1583 3495 1583 1774 3563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 96 130 939 84 154 1124 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1703 1583 1774 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 8.4 11.7 1.1 2.3 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 8.4 11.7 1.1 2.3 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 174 227 2453 1296 482 2799 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.57 0.38 0.06 0.32 0.40 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 290 330 2453 1296 669 2799 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 Upstream Filter(]) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.12 0.12 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 47.3 44.0 5.9 1.9 3.9 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.7 2.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),vehlln 2.9 3.8 5.6 0.8 1.1 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),slveh 50.0 46.2 6.4 2.0 4.0 0.1 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, vehlh 226 1023 1278 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.8 6.0 0.5 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 84.7 94.2 15.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 ` 62 81.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 4.3 13.7 2.0 10.4 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.3 21.2 24.5 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes ' HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary WC Synchro 8 Report Page 10 Freedom Manor 2020 Total (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 4\ t 1 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations r tt tT Volume (vph) 158 218 249 678 718 Lane Group Flow (vph) 172 237 271 737 1021 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 45 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 45 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 15.1 14.0 44.9 30.9 Total Split (%) 25.2% 23.3% 74.8% 51.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min vlc Ratio 0.67 0.39 0.65 0.37 0.77 Control Delay 38.6 11.0 15.5 2.8 20.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 38.6 11.0 15.5 2.8 20.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) 59 39 6 10 199 Queue Length 95th (ft) #132 85 67 17 #271 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 966 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 425 Base Capacity (vph) 270 614 435 2017 1322 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.39 0.62 0.37 0.77 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 20 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. plits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd tp2 R 04 RA S 15.1 s t 05 06 (R)_ Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 9 Freedom Manor 2020 Total (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 _-* ---* 41 I i Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r TT tT Volume (vehlh) 158 218 249 678 718 222 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1776 1776 1845 1681 1687 1900 Adj Flow Rate, vehlh 172 237 271 737 780 241 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 7 3 13 15 15 Cap, veh/h 271 407 383 1991 1059 327 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.04 0.21 0.14 0.14 Sat Flow, veh/h 1691 1509 1757 3279 2497 745 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 172 237 271 737 518 503 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1691 1509 1757 1597 1602 1555 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.7 8.2 4.4 11.9 18.6 18.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.7 8.2 4.4 11.9 18.6 18.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.48 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 271 407 383 1991 703 682 V/C Ratio(X) 0.64 0.58 0.71 0.37 0.74 0.74 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 271 407 469 1991 703 682 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter([) 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.81 0.81 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.6 19.0 12.9 13.7 22.3 22.3 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 4.8 2.1 3.2 0.5 5.6 5.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 3.0 7.0 2.6 5.4 9.3 9.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 28.4 21.1 16.2 14.2 27.9 28.1 LnGrp LOS C C B B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 409 1008 1021 Approach Delay, s/veh 24.2 14.7 28.0 Approach LOS C B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 44.9 15.1 11.1 33.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.4 9.6 9.5 23.4 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 13.9 10.2 6.4 20.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.5 0.0 0.2 2.2 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.9 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2020 Total (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 813/2015 4� * I I i Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT i Lane Configurations r tt +T Volume (vph) 238 430 283 737 747 Lane Group Flow (vph) 259 467 295 768 1026 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 13.0 43.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 28.3% 21.7% 71.7% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.79 0.68 0.77 0.38 0.79 Control Delay 43.3 18.5 25.2 4.8 10.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.3 18.5 25.2 4.8 10.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 90 113 38 95 13 Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 209 #138 20 #29 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2355 955 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 425 Base Capacity (vph) 332 665 384 2005 1300 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.78 0.70 0.77 0.38 0.79 Intersection Summary 1 Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. >plits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 102 R 04 Us 17s 'mil 05 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 • Freedom Manor 2020 Total (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/312015 -� 4\ T 1 .1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� fit tT Volume (vehlh) 238 430 283 737 747 217 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1810 1881 1845 1776 1800 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 259 467 295 768 795 231 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 1 3 7 6 6 Cap, vehlh 330 506 392 1996 1025 298 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.12 0.59 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1723 1599 1757 3463 2706 760 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 259 467 295 768 520 506 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1723 1599 1757 1687 1710 1666 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.6 11.5 5.4 7.2 17.6 17.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.6 11.5 5.4 7.2 17.6 17.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 506 392 1996 670 653 V/C Ratio(X) 0.78 0.92 0.75 0.38 0.78 0.78 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 506 422 1996 670 653 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 0.81 0.81 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.1 19.8 12.2 6.5 23.6 23.6 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 11.7 22.6 6.1 0.5 7.1 7.2 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 5.1 16.2 3.2 3.4 9.7 9.5 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 34.8 42.4 18.3 7.0 30.6 30.8 LnGrp LOS C D B A C C Approach Vol, veh/h 726 1063 1026 Approach Delay, s/veh 39.7 10.1 30.7 Approach LOS D B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.0 17.0 12.0 31.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.5 11.5 8.5 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 9.2 13.5 7.4 19.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 12.4 0.0 0.1 2.3 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 25.3 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 0 • G. 2026 Background Conditions - Synchro Worksheets 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Background AM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Approach 8.3 A EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 293 438 207 207 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 299 447 211 211 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 397 9 501 261 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 75 703 195 195 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 9.9 7.4 9.3 6.8 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 299 447 211 211 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 760 1120 685 870 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.979 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 293 438 207 207 Cap Entry, veh/h 745 1096 672 854 V/C Ratio 0.394 0.399 0.308 0.242 Control Delay, s/veh 9.9 7.4 9.3 6.8 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 E Freedom Manor 2026 Background AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations '� r tT tt r Volume (vph) 349 286 181 684 692 222 Lane Group Flow (vph) 379 311 197 743 752 241 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 28.0 28.0 13.0 42.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 40.0% 40.0% 18.6% 60.0% 41.4% 41.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.78 0.62 0.49 0.40 0.56 0.31 Control Delay 34.5 8.6 12.8 10.9 19.5 3.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.5 8.6 12.8 10.9 19.5 3.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 147 0 45 151 135 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 226 59 m110 m205 198 43 Internal Link Dist (ft) 328 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 225 275 Base Capacity (vph) 581 537 409 1873 1338 773 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.65 0.58 0.48 0.40 0.56 0.31 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 65 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. c 14� -a Dkoo 2• Rnnfn F')) R Unrlicnn VillnnP Fntranca 102 R 04 2s 1 028S 05 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Background AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR 4\ NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt 'fit r Volume (veh/h) 349 286 181 684 692 222 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1696 1776 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 379 311 197 743 752 241 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 12 7 2 Cap, veh/h 449 401 417 1947 1511 709 Arrive On Green 0.25 0.25 0.17 1.00 0.45 0.45 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 1583 1774 3308 3463 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 379 311 197 743 752 241 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1774 1612 1687 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 12.8 4.0 0.0 11.1 6.9 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 12.8 4.0 0.0 11.1 6.9 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 449 401 417 1947 1511 709 V/C Ratio(X) 0.84 0.78 0.47 0.38 0.50 0.34 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 583 520 469 1947 1511 709 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.77 0.77 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.8 24.3 8.5 0.0 13.7 12.6 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 8.7 5.5 0.6 0.4 1.2 1.3 Initial Q Delay(d3),slveh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 8.0 11.1 1.9 0.1 5.4 3.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.6 29.8 9.2 0.4 14.9 13.9 LnGrp LOS C C A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 690 940 993 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.9 2.3 14.7 Approach LOS C A B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 47.3 22.7 10.9 36.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 37.0 23.0 8.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 2.0 16.2 6.0 13.1 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 12.8 1.5 0.1 6.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.7 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 Freedom Manor 2026 Background AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 ♦ I I # Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT' j Lane Configurations y '� tT tT Volume (vph) 137 263 728 760 Lane Group Flow (vph) 377 286 791 1068 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 23.0 14.0 47.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 32.9% 20.0% 67.1% 47.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.93 0.82 0.44 0.91 Control Delay 57.4 31.6 7.5 21.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 57.4 31.6 7.5 21.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 152 66 133 222 Queue Length 95th (ft) #310 #170 27 #335 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 954 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 Base Capacity (vph) 411 353 1811 1180 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.92 0.81 0.44 0.91 Intersection Summary l -_ Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 21 (30%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. c..G+....-.4 DL,--- A• Dnnfo F)7 9 (D-ormill Rri 1 02 R 477 s 23 s l l 05 ■ 06 R 4 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 Freedom Manor 2026 Background AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 __-* ----* 4\ t II t Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y Tt 0 Volume (vph) 137 210 263 728 760 223 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.92 1.00 1.00 0.97 At Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1599 1752 3195 3093 At Permitted 0.98 0.13 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1599 244 3195 3093 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 149 228 286 791 826 242 RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 0 0 0 39 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 366 0 286 791 1029 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 3% 13% 15% 5% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 17.3 39.7 39.7 25.8 Effective Green, g (s) 17.3 39.7 39.7 25.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.25 0.57 0.57 0.37 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 395 340 1812 1139 v/s Ratio Prot c0.23 c0.11 0.25 0.33 v/s Ratio Perm c0.36 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.84 0.44 0.90 Uniform Delay, d1 25.7 14.3 8.7 20.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.03 0.76 0.49 Incremental Delay, d2 27.3 15.3 0.7 10.0 Delay (s) 53.0 30.1 7.3 20.2 Level of Service D C A C Approach Delay (s) 53.0 13.4 20.2 Approach LOS D B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 22.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.91 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 77.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 • Freedom Manor �J 2026 Background AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro S Report WC Page 7 • Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2026 Background AM 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tT r TT Volume (vph) 146 227 764 263 358 613 Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 247 830 286 389 666 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 15.0 32.0 23.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 21.4% 45.7% 32.9% 78.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min v/c Ratio 0.64 0.38 0.53 0.24 0.70 0.29 Control Delay 41.8 11.7 15.6 1.4 5.4 1.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.8 11.7 15.6 1.4 5.4 1.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 63 51 130 0 5 2 Queue Length 95th (ft) #138 89 206 26 m20 m17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 954 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 450 Base Capacity (vph) 261 744 1560 1186 665 2284 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.33 0.53 0.24 0.58 0.29 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 64 (91%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. L' Ct..., 4 D{.no r. Rn, ifn rii R, 1, ietoe nr 1170, t 2 R 23s I 132s 06 R08 .555 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 Freedom Manor 2026 Background AM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r '� tt Volume (veh/h) 146 227 764 263 358 613 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1727 1863 1863 1681 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 159 247 830 286 389 666 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 10 2 2 13 Cap, veh/h 253 425 1697 1045 504 2259 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3368 1583 1774 3279 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 159 247 830 286 389 666 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1641 1583 1774 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 9.5 11.4 5.2 6.0 12.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 9.5 11.4 5.2 6.0 12.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 253 425 1697 1045 504 2259 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.58 0.49 0.27 0.77 0.29 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 253 425 1697 1045 749 2259 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.30 0.30 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.2 22.2 10.9 4.9 11.0 12.5 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.8 2.0 1.0 0.6 0.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 3.2 4.4 5.4 3.4 4.6 5.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.1 24.2 11.9 5.6 11.9 12.6 LnGrp LOS C C B A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 406 1116 1055 Approach Delay, s/veh 27.7 10.3 12.3 Approach LOS C B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 41.7 55.0 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 " 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 18.5 ' 28 49.5 10.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 8.0 13.4 14.0 11.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.9 8.3 13.2 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 13.9 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 9 Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection i Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.3 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 160 575 129 129 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 163 586 131 131 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 274 24 270 443 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 300 377 167 167 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, slveh 6.2 9.7 5.8 7.0 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 163 586 131 131 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 859 1103 863 726 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.983 0.981 0.985 0.985 Flow Entry, veh/h 160 575 129 129 Cap Entry, veh/h 844 1082 849 714 V/C Ratio 0.190 0.531 0.152 0.181 Control Delay, s/veh 6.2 9.7 5.8 7.0 LOS A A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 3 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR I Lane Configurations '� r tt tt r Volume (vph) 189 155 238 790 842 290 Lane Group Flow (vph) 205 168 256 849 896 309 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 26.0 80.0 54.0 54.0 Total Split (%) 27.3% 27.3% 23.6% 72.7% 49.1% 49.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.71 0.42 0.54 0.33 0.43 Control Delay 56.8 9.1 17.7 11.0 13.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.8 9.1 17.7 11.0 13.7 Queue Length 50th (ft) 138 0 104 155 164 Queue Length 95th (ft) 205 55 m123 m163 273 Internal Link Dist (ft) 349 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 225 Base Capacity (vph) 402 489 595 2565 2073 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.51 0.34 0.43 0.33 0.43 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 98 (89%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Q nfE -A Dha oe- 2• Rnnfo 17,99 R Mar1iCM VIIInnP FntrAnCA C-Min 0.29 2.3 0.0 2.3 0 43 275 1077 0 0 0 0.29 t0z R p4 6 30 S 05 06 R J 26s 1 154S Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt tt r Volume (veh/h) 189 155 238 790 842 290 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1810 1810 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 205 168 256 849 896 309 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 5 5 2 Cap, veh/h 247 220 438 2648 2246 1034 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.14 1.00 0.65 0.65 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3529 3529 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 205 168 256 849 896 309 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1774 1583 1774 1719 1719 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 12.4 11.2 5.3 0.0 13.4 9.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 12.4 11.2 5.3 0.0 13.4 9.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 247 220 438 2648 2246 1034 V/C Ratio(X) 0.83 0.76 0.59 0.32 0.40 0.30 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 403 360 650 2648 2246 1034 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.51 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.1 45.6 6.0 0.0 8.9 8.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.5 5.4 0.6 0.2 0.5 0.7 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/wile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 6.6 9.8 2.6 0.1 6.5 4.2 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 53.6 51.0 6.7 0.2 9.5 9.0 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 373 1105 1205 Approach Delay, s/veh 52.5 1.7 9.3 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 89.7 20.3 12.9 76.9 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 75.0 25.0 21.0 49.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 2.0 14.4 7.3 15.4 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 19.7 0.9 0.6 15.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 12.2 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 • i Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y '� tT tT Volume (vph) 235 287 793 807 Lane Group Flow (vph) 751 299 826 1076 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 50.4 18.9 59.6 40.7 Total Split (%) 45.8% 17.2% 54.2% 37.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 1.09 0.99 0.52 1.05 Control Delay 94.3 81.7 16.1 71.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 94.3 81.7 16.1 71.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) -595 90 131 -431 Queue Length 95th (ft) 9831 #349 161 #535 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2343 958 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 350 Base Capacity (vph) 687 301 1598 1021 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.09 0.99 0.52 1.05 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 103 (94%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 0_1:;.. 4 OV------ A - D-J. r77 9- Qonormill Rri 1 02 R � 04 59.6 s 50.4 s 05 06 R .18.95 1 040.75 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 0 u Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 * I Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y tt Tl� Volume (vph) 235 456 287 793 807 204 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s)' 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.97 At Protected 0.98 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1662 1752 3374 3315 Flt Permitted 0.98 0.11 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1662 196 3374 3315 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Adj. Flow (vph) 255 496 299 826 859 217 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 0 0 0 20 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 742 0 299 826 1056 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 1% 3% 7% 6% 4% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 44.9 52.1 52.1 33.2 Effective Green, g (s) 44.9 52.1 52.1 33.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.41 0.47 0.47 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 678 296 1598 1000 v/s Ratio Prot c0.45 c0.13 0.24 0.32 v/s Ratio Perm c0.35 v/c Ratio 1.09 1.01 0.52 1.06 Uniform Delay, dl 32.5 32.4 20.2 38.4 Progression Factor 1.00 1.18 0.73 0.74 Incremental Delay, d2 63.2 53.2 1.1 43.4 Delay (s) 95.8 91.4 15.9 71.6 Level of Service F F B E Approach Delay (s) 95.8 35.9 71.6 Approach LOS F D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 64.2 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.08 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2026 Background PM 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r tT Volume (vph) 92 127 953 85 152 1111 Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 138 993 89 165 1208 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 28 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 1 2 28 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 23.0 65.0 22.0 87.0 Total Split (%) 20.9% 59.1% 20.0% 79.1% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min v/c Ratio 0.54 0.33 0.42 0.07 0.36 0.44 Control Delay 56.9 13.4 8.3 0.4 2.7 2.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.9 13.4 8.3 0.4 2.7 2.6 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 22 138 0 9 60 Queue Length 95th (ft) 119 69 216 7 m21 m108 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 958 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 450 Base Capacity (vph) 289 542 2376 1443 572 2776 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.35 0.25 0.42 0.06 0.29 0.44 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 16 (15%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Yp1 tz R faa ZZS SS 06 R 7 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 Freedom Manor 2026 Background PM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r tt Volume (veh/h) 92 127 953 85 152 1111 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1792 1863 1863 1827 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 100 138 993 89 165 1208 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 6 2 2 4 Cap, veh/h 183 235 2436 1296 456 2782 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.09 1.00 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3495 1583 1774 3563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 100 138 993 89 165 1208 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1703 1583 1774 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 8.9 12.9 1.2 2.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 8.9 12.9 1.2 2.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 183 235 2436 1296 456 2782 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.59 0.41 0.07 0.36 0.43 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 290 331 2436 1296 658 2782 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.09 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 43.7 6.3 1.9 4.2 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.5 2.3 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 3.0 4.1 6.1 0.9 1.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.4 46.0 6.8 2.0 4.3 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 238 1082 1373 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.5 6.4 0.6 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 84.2 93.7 16.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 ' 61 81.5 18.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.6 14.9 2.0 10.9 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.3 23.1 28.0 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 • 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Background (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations '� r tt tT Volume (vph) 137 210 263 728 760 Lane Group Flow (vph) 149 228 286 791 1068 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 45 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 45 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 13.6 14.4 46.4 32.0 Total Split (%) 22.7% 24.0% 77.3% 53.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.64 0.39 0.68 0.38 0.78 Control Delay 36.8 11.6 16.4 2.3 8.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 36.8 11.6 16.4 2.3 8.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 38 6 10 27 Queue Length 95th (ft) #116 85 #71 14 #59 Internal Link Dist (ft) 989 954 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 350 Base Capacity (vph) 243 587 444 2091 1372 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.61 0.39 0.64 0.38 0.78 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 23 (38%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. plits and Phases: 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd tR � 04 0z 16.4 s I 13.6 s t 05 • 06 R 4.4 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 • 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Background (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR j Lane Configurations r '� tt tl� Volume (vehlh) 137 210 263 728 760 223 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1776 1776 1845 1681 1685 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 149 228 286 791 826 242 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 7 3 13 15 15 Cap, veh/h 228 370 387 2071 1132 331 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.04 0.21 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1691 1509 1757 3279 2529 716 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 149 228 286 791 541 527 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlln 1691 1509 1757 1597 1601 1559 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.0 8.1 4.4 12.7 19.3 19.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.0 8.1 4.4 12.7 19.3 19.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.46 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 228 370 387 2071 741 722 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 0.62 0.74 0.38 0.73 0.73 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 228 370 483 2071 741 722 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.82 0.82 0.74 0.74 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.6 20.1 12.9 13.3 21.8 21.8 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 6.5 3.0 3.8 0.4 4.7 4.8 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 2.7 6.9 2.9 5.7 9.5 9.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 31.1 23.2 16.7 13.7 26.5 26.6 LnGrp LOS C C B B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 377 1077 1068 Approach Delay, s/veh 26.3 14.5 26.6 Approach LOS C B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.4 13.6 11.1 35.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 38.9 8.1 9.9 24.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 14.7 10.1 6.4 21.3 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 12.5 0.0 0.3 2.6 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.4 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2026 Background (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/4/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations '� '� tt tT Volume (vph) 235 456 287 793 807 Lane Group Flow (vph) 255 496 299 826 1076 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 4 5 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 45 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 17.0 13.0 43.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 28.3% 21.7% 71.7% 50.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.77 0.73 0.78 0.42 0.84 Control Delay 41.4 21.2 27.2 4.3 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.4 21.2 27.2 4.3 13.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 129 3 13 14 Queue Length 95th (ft) #193 #250 #143 22 #283 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2343 958 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 350 Base Capacity (vph) 332 685 384 1996 1281 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.77 0.72 0.78 0.41 0.84 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. c 14� ­4 Dkoo A• Rnnto R. Pnnormill Rrl Tpz R "i 04 3s 17s t 05 I • 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2026 Background (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/412015 __* --* 4l I i Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt tT Volume (veh/h) 235 456 287 793 807 204 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1810 1881 1845 1776 1799 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 255 496 299 826 859 217 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 1 3 7 6 6 Cap, veh/h 330 511 386 1996 1051 265 Arrive On Green 0.19 0.19 0.17 0.79 0.13 0.13 Sat Flow, veh/h 1723 1599 1757 3463 2795 683 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 255 496 299 826 543 533 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1723 1599 1757 1687 1709 1679 Q Serve(g_s), s 8.4 11.5 5.7 4.6 18.5 18.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 8.4 11.5 5.7 4.6 18.5 18.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.41 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 330 511 386 1996 664 652 V/C Ratio(X) 0.77 0.97 0.77 0.41 0.82 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 330 511 410 1996 664 652 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 0.79 0.79 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.0 20.1 11.7 3.1 24.1 24.1 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 10.7 32.2 7.4 0.5 8.7 8.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 5.0 18.3 3.4 2.2 10.4 10.3 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.7 52.3 19.1 3.7 32.8 32.9 LnGrp LOS C D B A C C Approach Vol, veh/h 751 1125 1076 Approach Delay, s/veh 46.0 7.8 32.9 Approach LOS D A C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.0 17.0 12.2 30.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 35.5 11.5 8.5 22.5 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 6.6 13.5 7.7 20.6 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 14.0 0.0 0.1 1.6 Intersection Summary i HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 26.6 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 r-I LJ r� U H. 2026 Total Conditions - Synchro & SIDRA Worksheets INTERSECTION SUMMARY* 8 Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout Travel Speed (Average) Travel Distance (Total) Travel Time (Total) Demand Flows (Total) Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) Degree of Saturation Practical Spare Capacity Effective Intersection Capacity Control Delay (Total) Control Delay (Average) Control Delay (Worst Lane) Control Delay (Worst Movement) Geometric Delay (Average) Stop -Line Delay (Average) Idling Time (Average) Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 95% Back of Queue - Vehicles (Worst Lane) 95% Back of Queue - Distance (Worst Lane) Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) Total Effective Stops Effective Stop Rate Proportion Queued Performance Index Cost (Total) Fuel Consumption (Total) Carbon Dioxide (Total) Hydrocarbons (Total) Carbon Monoxide (Total) NOx (Total) 32.2 mph 694.1 veh-mi/h 21.6 veh-h/h 1098 veh/h 4.4 % 0.469 81.4 % 2343 veh/h 2.69 veh-h/h 8.8 sec 9.4 sec 9.4 sec 0.0 sec 8.8 sec 7.0 sec LOS A 2.6 veh 67.8 ft 0.06 267 veh/h 0.24 per veh 0.35 31.8 366.41 $/h 32.6 gal/h 292.6 kg/h 0.026 kg/h 0.372 kg/h 0.612 kg/h 32.2 mph 832.9 pers-mi/h 25.9 pers-h/h 1317 pers/h 3.23 pers-h/h 8.8 sec 9.4 sec 321 pers/h 0.24 per pers 0.35 31.8 366.41 $/h Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Demand Flows (Total) 526,957 veh/y 632,348 pers/y Delay 1,293 veh-h/y 1,551 pers-h/y Effective Stops 128,275 veh/y 153,930 pers/y Travel Distance 333,159 veh-mi/y 399,791 pers-mi/y Travel Time 10,345 veh-h/y 12,414 pers-h/y Cost 175,875 $/y 175,875 $/y Fuel Consumption 15,627 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 140,445 kg/y Hydrocarbons 13 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 179 kg/y NOx 294 kg/y Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:56 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Protect: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC MOVEMENT SUMMARY 8 Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout South: Papermill Road u 8 T1 439 3.7 0.469 8.9 LOS A 2.6 67.8 0.27 18 R2 40 3.0 0.469 8.9 LOS A 2.6 67.8 0.27 Approach 479 3.6 0.469 8.9 LOS A 2.6 67.8 0.27 East: Site Entrance 1 L2 108 3.0 0.331 9.4 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.55 16 R2 123 3.0 0.331 9.4 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.55 Approach 230 3.0 0.331 9.4 LOS A 1.3 33.6 0.55 North: Papermill Road 7 L2 62 3.0 0.407 8.4 LOS A 2.0 51.3 0,32 4 T1 326 6.8 0.407 8.4 LOS A 2.0 51.3 0.32 Approach 388 6.2 0.407 8.4 LOS A 2.0 51.3 0.32 All Vehicles 1098 4.4 0.469 8.8 LOS A 2.6 67.8 0.35 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. 0.13 35.2 0.13 27.6 0.13 34.4 0.55 27.0 0.55 26.4 0.55 26.7 0.20 29.1 0.20 34.7 0.20 33.7 0.24 32.2 Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:56 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Ply Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC LEVEL OF SERVICE V Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection LOS A A A A I N Papermill Road Papermull Road C C W V a+ N Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:56 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd 5 l D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom ManofWNALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\PapermillRoad at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNON[ ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC DELAY (CONTROL) • Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) V Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 8.9 9.4 8.4 8.8 LOS A A A A IL 64 64 Papermill Road a� v 9.4 w 9.4 r M Papermill Road 59 Colour code based on Level of Service LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Continuous Level of Service Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010) LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Roundabout Level of Service Method: Same as Sign Control HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:56 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.. PLUS / 1PC DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (v/c ratio) V Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 0.47 0.33 0.41 0.47 IL 041 0.41 Papermill Road v c 1 c W 05 Papermill Road 0.47 047 Colour code based on Degree of Saturation [<0.6] [0.6-0.7] [0.7-0.8] [0.8-0.9] [0.9-1.0] [>1.0] Continuous Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:09:56 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC C� J Freedom Manor 2026 Total AM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.8 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 370 389 208 208 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 378 396 212 212 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 338 79 511 270 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 144 644 205 205 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 10.9 7.5 9.4 6.9 Approach LOS B A A A Lane Left Left Left Left i Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 378 396 212 212 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 806 1044 678 863 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, vehlh 370 389 208 208 Cap Entry, veh/h 789 1024 665 846 V/C Ratio 0.469 0.379 0.313 0.246 Control Delay, s/veh 10.9 7.5 9.4 6.9 LOS B A A A 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 1 1 HCM 2010 Roundabout Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 0 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 ♦ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r Volume (vph) 397 186 121 708 699 236 Lane Group Flow (vph) 432 202 132 770 760 257 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 31.0 10.0 39.0 29.0 29.0 Total Split (%) 44.3% 44.3% 14.3% 55.7% 41.4% 41.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min vlc Ratio 0.79 0.32 0.37 0.44 0.54 Control Delay 32.9 4.1 6.5 6.0 18.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 32.9 4.1 6.5 6.0 18.9 Queue Length 50th (ft) 166 0 9 26 140 Queue Length 95th (ft) 245 38 m25 m172 201 Internal Link Dist (ft) 346 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 200 Base Capacity (vph) 657 714 357 1767 1413 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.66 0.28 0.37 0.44 0.54 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 50 (71%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. C-Min 0.32 3.7 0.0 3.7 0 44 275 812 0 0 0 0.32 splits and Phases: 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance t02 R 04 195 031s 05 T 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 • !. Freedom Manor 2026 Total AM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR ' Lane Configurations r TT tt r Volume (veh/h) 397 186 121 708 699 236 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1696 1776 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 432 202 132 770 760 257 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 12 7 2 Cap, veh/h 498 445 372 1857 1480 695 Arrive On Green 0.28 0.28 0.13 1.00 0.44 0.44 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3308 3463 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 432 202 132 770 760 257 Grp Sat Flow(s),vehlhlln 1774 1583 1774 1612 1687 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 16.2 7.4 2.7 0.0 11.4 7.6 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 16.2 7.4 2.7 0.0 11.4 7.6 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 498 445 372 1857 1480 695 V/C Ratio(X) 0.87 0.45 0.35 0.41 0.51 0.37 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 659 588 382 1857 1480 695 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.73 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.9 20.7 9.2 0.0 14.2 13.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 9.3 0.7 0.4 0.5 1.3 1.5 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 9.2 6.8 1.3 0.1 5.5 3.6 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.3 21.5 9.6 0.5 15.5 14.7 LnGrp LOS C C A A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 634 902 1017 Approach Delay, s/veh 29.5 1.8 15.3 Approach LOS C A B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 45.3 24.7 9.6 35.7 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 34.0 26.0 5.0 24.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 2.0 18.2 4.7 13.4 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 12.9 1.5 0.0 6.8 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.1 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 • Freedom Manor 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 2026 Total AM 7/29/2015 Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations 'rj°r` '� TT tT Volume (vph) 114 292 715 741 Lane Group Flow (vph) 434 317 777 967 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 25.1 14.6 44.9 30.3 Total Split (%) 35.9% 20.9% 64.1% 43.3% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.95 0.86 0.46 0.94 Control Delay 59.4 35.4 8.7 34.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.4 35.4 8.7 34.8 Queue Length 50th (ft) 177 81 133 235 Queue Length 95th (ft) #352 #194 36 #328 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2916 958 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 425 Base Capacity (vph) 455 370 1707 1035 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.95 0.86 0.46 0.93 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 19 (27%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 0 • Freedom Manor 2026 Total AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y tt t*t+ Volume (vph) 114 285 292 715 741 149 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.97 At Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1582 1752 3195 3105 Fit Permitted 0.99 0.15 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1582 270 3195 3105 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 124 310 317 777 805 162 RTOR Reduction (vph) 11 0 0 0 24 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 423 0 317 777 943 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 3% 13% 15% 5% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 19.6 37.4 37.4 22.8 Effective Green, g (s) 19.6 37.4 37.4 22.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.53 0.53 0.33 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 442 358 1707 1011 v/s Ratio Prot c0.27 c0.13 0.24 0.30 v/s Ratio Perm c0.34 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.89 0.46 0.93 Uniform Delay, dl 24.8 15.0 10.0 22.9 Progression Factor 1.00 1.03 0.77 0.81 Incremental Delay, d2 31.7 19.9 0.8 14.7 Delay (s) 56.5 35.4 8.5 33.2 Level of Service E D A C Approach Delay (s) 56.5 16.3 33.2 Approach LOS E B C Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 29.8 HCM 2000 Level of Service C HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.96 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 70.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 0 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2026 Total AM 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r '� tt Volume (vph) 146 227 780 263 358 669 Lane Group Flow (vph) 159 247 848 286 389 727 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 8 1 2 2 8 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 15.0 33.0 22.0 55.0 Total Split (%) 21.4% 47.1% 31.4% 78.6% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None C-Min v/c Ratio 0.64 0.38 0.54 0.24 0.71 0.32 Control Delay 41.4 11.6 15.7 1.5 5.6 1.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.4 11.6 15.7 1.5 5.6 1.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 63 50 134 2 2 1 Queue Length 95th (ft) #138 91 206 27 m17 m18 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 958 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 375 Base Capacity (vph) 263 726 1564 1184 639 2284 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.60 0.34 0.54 0.24 0.61 0.32 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 70 Actuated Cycle Length: 70 Offset: 61 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 1701 �02 R A 22s 133S T 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 8 • 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total AM 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tt r '� tt Volume (veh/h) 146 227 780 263 358 669 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1727 1863 1863 1681 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 159 247 848 286 389 727 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 10 2 2 13 Cap, veh/h 253 424 1699 1046 498 2259 Arrive On Green 0.14 0.14 0.52 0.52 0.04 0.23 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 3368 1583 1774 3279 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 159 247 848 286 389 727 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1641 1583 1774 1597 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 9.5 11.8 5.2 6.0 13.2 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 9.5 11.8 5.2 6.0 13.2 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 253 424 1699 1046 498 2259 V/C Ratio(X) 0.63 0.58 0.50 0.27 0.78 0.32 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 253 424 1699 1046 719 2259 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.24 0.24 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 28.2 22.2 11.0 4.9 11.2 12.9 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 4.8 2.0 1.1 0.6 0.9 0.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 3.2 4.4 5.5 3.4 4.6 5.9 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 33.1 24.2 12.0 5.6 12.1 13.0 LnGrp LOS C C B A B B Approach Vol, veh/h 406 1134 1116 Approach Delay, slveh 27.7 10.4 12.7 Approach LOS C B B Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 13.3 41.7 55.0 15.0 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 ' 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 17.5 * 29 49.5 10.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 8.0 13.8 15.2 11.5 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.8 8.9 13.9 0.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 14.0 HCM 2010 LOS B Notes HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 INTERSECTION SUMMAR4 V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout Travel Speed (Average) Travel Distance (Total) Travel Time (Total) Demand Flows (Total) Percent Heavy Vehicles (Demand) Degree of Saturation Practical Spare Capacity Effective Intersection Capacity Control Delay (Total) Control Delay (Average) Control Delay (Worst Lane) Control Delay (Worst Movement) Geometric Delay (Average) Stop -Line Delay (Average) Idling Time (Average) Intersection Level of Service (LOS) 95% Back of Queue - Vehicles (Worst Lane) 95% Back of Queue - Distance (Worst Lane) Queue Storage Ratio (Worst Lane) Total Effective Stops Effective Stop Rate Proportion Queued Performance Index Cost (Total) Fuel Consumption (Total) Carbon Dioxide (Total) Hydrocarbons (Total) Carbon Monoxide (Total) NOx (Total) 30.4 mph 949.4 veh-mi/h 31.2 veh-h/h 1502 veh/h 3.5 % 0.769 10.6 % 1954 veh/h 6.18 veh-h/h 14.8 sec 18.0 sec 18.0 sec 0.0 sec 14.8 sec 12.1 sec LOS B 8.2 veh 211.0 ft 0.17 432 veh/h 0.29 per veh 0.48 52.1 506.60 $/h 43.0 gal/h 385.8 kg/h 0.036 kg/h 0.511 kg/h 0.690 kg/h n u 30.4 mph 1139.2 pers-mi/h 37.4 pers-h/h 1803 pers/h 7.41 pers-h/h 14.8 sec 18.0 sec 519 pers/h 0.29 per pers 0.48 52.1 506.60 $/h Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Intersection LOS value for Vehicles is based on average delay for all vehicle movements. Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Demand Flows (Total) 721,043 veh/y 865,252 pers/y Delay 2,965 veh-h/y 3,557 pers-h/y Effective Stops 207,531 veh/y 249,037 pers/y Travel Distance 455,688 veh-mi/y 546,826 pers-mi/y Travel Time 14,974 veh-h/y 17,969 pers-h/y Cost 243,167 $/y 243,167 $/y Fuel Consumption 20,643 gal/y Carbon Dioxide 185,189 kg/y Hydrocarbons 17 kg/y Carbon Monoxide 245 kg/y NOx 331 kg/y Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:10:00 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Ply Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0 24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com INTERSECTION 6 Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\l404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Pap ermill Road at Site Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNON[ ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC MOVEMENT SUMMARY 0 0 ® Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout South: Papermill Road 8 T1 487 3.4 0.603 12.1 LOS B 4.1 104.6 0.44 18 R2 102 3.0 0.603 12.1 LOS B 4.1 104.6 0.44 Approach 589 3.3 0.603 12.1 LOS B 4.1 104.6 0.44 East: Site Entrance 1 L2 60 3.0 0.190 7.7 LOS A 0.7 17.2 0.52 16 R2 66 3.0 0.190 7.7 LOS A 0.7 17.2 0.52 Approach 126 3.0 0.190 7.7 LOS A 0.7 17.2 0.52 North: Papermill Road 7 L2 109 3.0 0.769 18.0 LOS C 8.2 211.0 0.50 4 T1 678 3.9 0.769 18.0 LOS C 8.2 211.0 0.50 Approach 787 3.8 0.769 18.0 LOS C 8.2 211.0 0.50 All Vehicles 1502 3.5 0.769 14.8 LOS B 8.2 211.0 0.48 Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Vehicle movement LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per movement LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all movements (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). Roundabout Capacity Model: US HCM 2010. HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Gap -Acceptance Capacity: Traditional M1. HV (%) values are calculated for All Movement Classes of All Heavy Vehicle Model Designation. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:10:00 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Ply Ltd SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC 0.28 33.5 0.28 26.5 0.28 32.0 0.51 27.5 0.51 27.0 0.51 27.2 0.26 26.0 0.26 30.6 0.26 29.9 0.29 30.4 SIDRA INTERSECTION 6 LEVEL OF SERVICE V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection LOS B A C B 1" Paoerm II Road Paoerm II Poad m A W Level of Service (LOS) Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010). Roundabout LOS Method: Same as Sign Control. Lane LOS values are based on average delay and v/c ratio (degree of saturation) per lane. LOS F will result if v/c > irrespective of lane delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Intersection and Approach LOS values are based on average delay for all lanes (v/c not used as specified in HCM 2010). HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:10:00 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-FreedomManor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Paperm ill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1 PC DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 12.1 7.7 18.0 14.8 LOS B A C B Papermill Road �1 w Papermill Road Colour code based on Level of Service LOS A LOS B LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Continuous Level of Service Method: Delay & v/c (HCM 2010) LOS F will result if v/c > 1 irrespective of movement delay value (does not apply for approaches and intersection). Roundabout Level of Service Method: Same as Sign Control HCM Delay Formula option is used. Control Delay does not include Geometric Delay since Exclude Geometric Delay option applies. Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:10:00 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd 51 D RA SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421. 6023191. PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC.. PLUS / 1PC DEGREE OF SATURATION E Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vlc ratio) V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North Intersection 0.60 0.19 0.77 0.77 IL Papermill Road u rvi � W z Papermill Road 0.60 060 Colour code based on Degree of Saturation —0—_0_0 [<0.6] [0.6-0.7] [0.7-0.8] [0.8-0.9] [0.9-1.0] [>1.0] Continuous Processed: Wednesday, July 29, 2015 3:10:00 PM Copyright © 2000-2014 Akcelik and Associates Pty Ltd S I D R A SIDRA INTERSECTION 6.0.24.4877 www.sidrasolutions.com Project: Q:\Projects\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor ANALYTICAL\CALCULATIONS\SIDRA\Papermill Road at Site INTERSECTION 6 Entrance Roundabout.sip6 8001421, 6023191, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC., PLUS / 1PC Freedom Manor 2026 Total PM 2: Mad. Vill. Commercial & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh Intersection LOS Approach 8.3 A EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 212 538 129 129 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 217 549 132 132 Vehicles Circulating, vehlh 236 65 284 445 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 341 351 169 169 Follow -Up Headway, s 3.186 3.186 3.186 3.186 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.7 9.7 5.9 7.1 Approach LOS A A A A Lane Left Left Left Left Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR RT Channelized Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Critical Headway, s 5.193 5.193 5.193 5.193 Entry Flow, veh/h 217 549 132 132 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 892 1059 851 724 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.977 0.979 0.977 0.977 Flow Entry, veh/h 212 538 129 129 Cap Entry, veh/h 872 1037 831 708 V/C Ratio 0.243 0.518 0.155 0.182 Control Delay, s/veh 6.7 9.7 5.9 7.1 LOS 95th %tile HCM 2010 WC 0 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 t 4\ t 1 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r Tt tt r Volume (vph) 216 102 155 804 866 338 Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 111 167 865 921 360 Turn Type Prot Perm pm+pt NA NA Perm Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 2 6 Detector Phase 4 4 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 Total Split (s) 35.0 35.0 19.0 75.0 56.0 56.0 Total Split (%) 31.8% 31.8% 17.3% 68.2% 50.9% 50.9% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.74 0.30 0.39 0.35 0.44 0.33 Control Delay 55.9 8.7 11.9 5.7 13.8 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.9 8.7 11.9 5.7 13.8 2.3 Queue Length 50th (ft) 158 0 41 88 172 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 227 44 m51 m86 275 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 342 2281 783 Turn Bay Length (ft) 250 200 275 Base Capacity (vph) 482 512 493 2504 2072 1097 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.49 0.22 0.34 0.35 0.44 0.33 Intersection Summa Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Snlits and Phases- 3: Route 522 & Madison Villaoe Entrance r 102 R p4 75s W5s 05 06 R J 195 1 Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2026 Total PM 3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance 7/29/2015 __* ---* 4\ I i Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r tt tt r Volume (veh/h) 216 102 155 804 866 338 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1863 1810 1810 1863 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 235 111 167 865 921 360 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 1 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.93 0.93 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 2 5 5 2 Cap, veh/h 276 246 384 2591 2262 1042 Arrive On Green 0.16 0.16 0.10 1.00 0.66 0.66 Sat Flow, veh/h 1774 1583 1774 3529 3529 1583 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 235 111 167 865 921 360 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 1774 1583 1774 1719 1719 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 14.2 7.0 3.3 0.0 13.8 11.1 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 14.2 7.0 3.3 0.0 13.8 11.1 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 276 246 384 2591 2262 1042 V/C Ratio(X) 0.85 0.45 0.44 0.33 0.41 0.35 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 484 432 520 2591 2262 1042 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 1.00 1.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.51 0.51 1.00 1.00 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 45.2 42.2 6.0 0.0 8.8 8.3 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 7.3 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.5 0.9 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 7.5 6.3 1.6 0.1 6.7 5.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 52.5 43.5 6.4 0.2 9.3 9.2 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 346 1032 1281 Approach Delay, slveh 49.6 1.2 9.3 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 87.9 22.1 10.5 77.4 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 70.0 30.0 14.0 51.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 2.0 16.2 5.3 15.8 Green Ext Time (p_c), s 20.9 0.9 0.2 17.0 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 11.4 HCM 2010 LOS B HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 4 Freedom Manor 2026 Total PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 * I Lane Group EBL NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations y '� TT TT Volume (vph) 181 357 778 797 Lane Group Flow (vph) 738 372 810 1045 Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 48.0 22.0 62.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 43.6% 20.0% 56.4% 36.4% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 1.14 1.06 0.48 1.05 Control Delay 112.3 91.5 13.7 70.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 112.3 91.5 13.7 70.0 Queue Length 50th (ft) -605 -236 199 -416 Queue Length 95th (ft) #840 #406 117 #520 Internal Link Dist (ft) 4495 955 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 425 Base Capacity (vph) 648 351 1671 999 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.14 1.06 0.48 1.05 Intersection Summary Cycle Length:110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 1 (1%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 5 0 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Y tt TT Volume (vph) 181 498 357 778 797 185 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Total Lost time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.90 1.00 1.00 0.97 Flt Protected 0.99 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1655 1752 3374 3321 Flt Permitted 0.99 0.11 1.00 1.00 Satd Flow (perm) 1655 199 3374 3321 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Adj, Flow (vph) 197 541 372 810 848 197 RTOR Reduction (vph) 9 0 0 0 18 0 Lane Group Flow (vph) 729 0 372 810 1027 0 Heavy Vehicles (%) 5% 1% 3% 7% 6% 4% Turn Type Prot pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Actuated Green, G (s) 42.5 54.5 54.5 32.5 Effective Green, g (s) 42.5 54.5 54.5 32.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.39 0.50 0.50 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 639 345 1671 981 v/s Ratio Prot c0.44 c0.17 0.24 0.31 v/s Ratio Perm c0.36 v/c Ratio 1.14 1.08 0.48 1.05 Uniform Delay, d1 33.8 33.2 18.4 38.8 Progression Factor 1.00 0.93 0.69 0.76 Incremental Delay, d2 81.1 69.1 0.9 40.7 Delay (s) 114.8 100.0 13.6 70.3 Level of Service F F B E Approach Delay (s) 114.8 40.8 70.3 Approach LOS F D E Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 69.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 1.14 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 110.0 Sum of lost time (s) 17.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 c Critical Lane Group HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Synchro 8 Report WC Page 6 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 7/29/2015 HCM 2010 Computation does not support turning movement with Shared and Exclusive lanes. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 7 • • Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2026 Total PM 7/29/2015 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT a Lane Configurations r tt r tT Volume (vph) 92 127 1008 85 152 1143 Lane Group Flow (vph) 100 138 1050 89 165 1242 Turn Type Prot pt+ov NA pt+ov pm+pt NA Protected Phases 8 81 2 28 1 6 Permitted Phases 6 Detector Phase 8 81 2 28 1 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.0 9.5 9.5 10.5 Total Split (s) 22.0 67.0 21.0 88.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 60.9% 19.1% 80.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.0 4.5 4.5 5.5 Lead/Lag Lao Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None C-Min None v/c Ratio 0.54 0.33 0.44 0.07 0.38 Control Delay 56.9 14.7 8.5 0.4 5.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 56.9 14.7 8.5 0.4 5.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 68 25 150 0 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 119 73 234 7 m15 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1467 2215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 225 325 375 Base Capacity (vph) 273 519 2376 1430 539 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.37 0.27 0.44 0.06 0.31 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 110 Actuated Cycle Length: 110 Offset: 7 (6%), Referenced to phase 2:NBT and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Tyr m Voluml 1_01 21s 1 t76 R Timings WC C-Min 0.45 5.5 0.0 5.5 178 m88 955 2776 0 0 0 0.45 0 L� Freedom Manor 5: Route 522 & Justes Dr 2026 Total PM 7/29/2015 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r tT r TT Volume (veh/h) 92 127 1008 85 152 1143 Number 3 18 2 12 1 6 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1863 1863 1792 1863 1863 1827 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 100 138 1050 89 165 1242 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 2 2 6 2 2 4 Cap, veh/h 182 234 2437 1296 435 2783 Arrive On Green 0.10 0.10 0.72 0.72 0.09 1.00 Sat Flow, vehlh 1774 1583 3495 1583 1774 3563 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 100 138 1050 89 165 1242 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1774 1583 1703 1583 1774 1736 Q Serve(g_s), s 5.9 8.9 13.9 1.2 2.6 0.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 5.9 8.9 13.9 1.2 2.6 0.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 182 234 2437 1296 435 2783 V/C Ratio(X) 0.55 0.59 0.43 0.07 0.38 0.45 Avail Cap(c_a), vehlh 274 316 2437 1296 621 2783 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.09 0.09 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 46.9 43.7 6.4 1.9 4.5 0.0 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 2.6 2.4 0.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),vehlln 3.0 4.1 6.6 0.9 1.2 0.0 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 49.5 46.1 7.0 2.0 4.5 0.0 LnGrp LOS D D A A A A Approach Vol, veh/h 238 1139 1407 Approach Delay, s/veh 47.5 6.6 0.6 Approach LOS D A A Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 1 2 6 8 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 9.5 84.2 93.7 16.3 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 " 5.5 5.5 5.0 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 16.5 ` 63 82.5 17.0 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+11), s 4.6 15.9 2.0 10.9 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 0.3 24.8 30.6 0.4 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 7.0 HCM 2010 LOS A Notes ' HCM 2010 computational engine requires equal clearance times for the phases crossing the barrier. HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 10 Freedom Manor 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 2026 Total (2 Lane EB) AM 8/3/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations r tt tT Volume (vph) 114 285 292 715 741 Lane Group Flow (vph) 124 310 317 777 967 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 45 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 4 5 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 13.4 16.0 46.6 30.6 Total Split (%) 22.3% 26.7% 77.7% 51.0% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.68 0.38 0.74 Control Delay 34.3 14.4 14.2 2.4 9.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.3 14.4 14.2 2.4 9.5 Queue Length 50th (ft) 43 65 6 10 17 Queue Length 95th (ft) #100 123 65 14 #37 Internal Link Dist (ft) 2916 958 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 425 Base Capacity (vph) 233 624 507 2086 1303 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.53 0.50 0.63 0.37 0.74 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 2 (3%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. C.,IUo ­4 Dhoone- A• Pnnfo r)) R Pnnarmill PH - t02 R 04 6 s 13.4 s t. 05 06 R Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 Freedom Manor 2026 Total (2 Lane EB) AM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8l3/2015 4� Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� tt tT Volume (vehlh) 114 285 292 715 741 149 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/hlln 1776 1776 1845 1681 1677 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 124 310 317 777 805 162 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Percent Heavy Veh, % 7 7 3 13 15 15 Cap,vehlh 223 381 429 2082 1205 242 Arrive On Green 0.13 0.13 0.04 0.22 0.15 0.15 Sat Flow, veh/h 1691 1509 1757 3279 2727 532 Grp Volume(v), vehlh 124 310 317 777 485 482 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/hlin 1691 1509 1757 1597 1593 1583 Q Serve(g_s), s 4.1 7.9 4.9 12.5 17.3 17.3 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 4.1 7.9 4.9 12.5 17.3 17.3 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.34 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 223 381 429 2082 726 721 V/C Ratio(X) 0.56 0.81 0.74 0.37 0.67 0.67 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 223 381 553 2082 726 721 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter([) 1.00 1.00 0.82 0,82 0.83 0.83 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 24.4 21.1 12.3 13.1 21.2 21.2 Incr Delay (d2), slveh 3.1 12.6 3.1 0.4 4.0 4.1 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 %ile BackOfQ(-26165%),vehlln 2.1 10.3 3.2 5.6 8.4 8.4 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.5 33.7 15.5 13.5 25.3 25.3 LnGrp LOS C C B B C C Approach Vol, veh/h 434 1094 967 Approach Delay, s/veh 31.9 14.1 25.3 Approach LOS C B C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 46.6 13.4 11.8 34.8 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 39.1 7.9 11.5 23.1 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+l1), s 14.5 9.9 6.9 19.3 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 11.6 0.0 0.4 2.9 Intersection Summary HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 21.5 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 Freedom Manor 2026 Total (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/3/2015 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT Lane Configurations r tt TT Volume (vph) 181 498 357 778 797 Lane Group Flow (vph) 197 541 372 810 1045 Turn Type Prot pt+ov pm+pt NA NA Protected Phases 4 45 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 45 5 2 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 10.5 9.5 12.5 12.5 Total Split (s) 16.1 14.2 43.9 29.7 Total Split (%) 26.8% 23.7% 73.2% 49.5% Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.0 6.0 6.0 All -Red Time (s) 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 5.5 4.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Recall Mode None None C-Min C-Min v/c Ratio 0.62 0.76 0.88 0.40 0.85 Control Delay 33.3 23.0 35.1 3.8 15.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.3 23.0 35.1 3.8 15.1 Queue Length 50th (ft) 67 148 7 5 8 Queue Length 95th (ft) #145 #307 #195 22 #272 Internal Link Dist (ft) 4495 955 2281 Turn Bay Length (ft) 325 425 Base Capacity (vph) 318 708 425 2046 1262 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.62 0.76 0.88 0.40 0.83 Intersection Summary Cycle Length: 60 Actuated Cycle Length: 60 Offset: 56 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Q 14E ­4 Dkoo A• Rnnfo r99 R Pnnarmill PH - 102 R 04 3.9 s 16.1 s t 05 06 R 4. .7s Timings Synchro 8 Report WC Page 1 9 0 Freedom Manor 2026 Total (2 Lane EB) PM 4: Route 522 & Papermill Rd 8/3/2015 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r '� tt 0 Volume (vehlh) 181 498 357 778 797 185 Number 7 14 5 2 6 16 Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/In 1810 1881 1845 1776 1799 1900 Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 197 541 372 810 848 197 Adj No. of Lanes 1 1 1 2 2 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.96 0.96 0.94 0.94 Percent Heavy Veh, % 5 1 3 7 6 6 Cap, veh/h 304 530 433 2047 1039 241 Arrive On Green 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.81 0.12 0.12 Sat Flow, veh/h 1723 1599 1757 3463 2845 640 Grp Volume(v), veh/h 197 541 372 810 526 519 Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/In 1723 1599 1757 1687 1709 1686 Q Serve(g_s), s 6.4 10.6 7.2 4.1 18.0 18.0 Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 6.4 10.6 7.2 4.1 18.0 18.0 Prop In Lane 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.38 Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 304 530 433 2047 644 636 V/C Ratio(X) 0.65 1.02 0.86 0.40 0.82 0.82 Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 304 530 445 2047 644 636 HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.33 1.33 0.33 0.33 Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 1.00 0.84 0.84 0.83 0.83 Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 23.0 20.1 11.3 2.7 24.2 24.2 Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 4.7 44.6 13.1 0.5 9.2 9.4 Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 °/wile BackOfQ(-26165%),veh/In 3.4 21.2 4.9 1.9 10.2 10.1 LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 27.7 64.7 24.4 3.2 33.5 33.6 LnGrp LOS C F C A C C Approach Vol, veh/h 738 1182 1045 Approach Delay, slveh 54.8 9.8 33.5 Approach LOS D A C Timer 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Assigned Phs 2 4 5 6 Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 43.9 16.1 13.8 30.1 Change Period (Y+Rc), s 7.5 5.5 4.5 7.5 Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 36.4 10.6 9.7 22.2 Max Q Clear Time (g_c+ll), s 6.1 12.6 9.2 20.0 Green Ext Time (p-c), s 13.8 0.0 0.1 1.8 Intersection Summary { HCM 2010 Ctrl Delay 29.4 HCM 2010 LOS C HCM 2010 Signalized Intersection Summary Synchro 8 Report WC Page 2 0 APPENDIX B ROUNDABOUT JUSTIFICATION STUDY • PAPERMILL RD FREEDOM MANOR ENTRANCE ROUNDABOUT JUSTIFICATION Freedom Manor Rezoning FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA • C� Papermill Road/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification In association with the Freedom Manor Rezoning Located in Frederick County, Virginia Prepared tor: Dave Holliday Construction 420 W. Jubal Carly Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 667-2120 Prepared by: Pennoni Associates Inc. Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects 1 17 East Piccadilly St Pennons Winchester, Virginia 22601 T 540.667.2139 - F 540.665.0493 DOUGLAS R. Y, iipy� rd NO.21450 9-1-15 A7 August 12, 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................4 A) PURPOSE OF REPORT AND STUDY OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................4 A) BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT FACILITIES..............................................................................................................7 F) ACCESS MANAGEMENT SPACING..............................................................................................................................13 G) PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN......................................................................................................................................13 3. DESIGN ELEMENTS........................................................................................................................................14 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.......................................................................................................................16 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH..................................................................................................................................................16 B) SITE TRAFFIC.........................................................................................................................................................16 C) FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT................................................................................19 D) SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...........................................................................................................................19 E) LONG-TERM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS............................................................................................................................21 5. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS.........................................................................................................................24 6. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................................................................27 Contact Information The analysis was prepared by Pennoni: Mr. Ronald A. Mislowsky, PE Mr. Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Mr. Patrick Sowers Mr. James R. Gray, PE Mr. Wan Chong, E.I.T. Mr. Graham Young, E.I.T. Pennoni 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667-2139 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 Herndon, Virginia 20171 (703) 449-6700 V:\PROJECTS\DI-iOL\1404-Freedom Rl:tnor\DOCUNIEN'I'S\REI'OII'I'S\1'ennoni_Freedom Dianor_Paper mill Roundabout J us tification_201509.doc LIST OF FIGURES I .�hihi/ /I: Firedon Alanor• Concert Roundabout .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Iigrrrr 1: Sile Localiorn................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 L'igwr 2. f rrerdonn Alunor/laetr P/run.......................................................................................................................................................... G GNhihil 13: Gaslern Frrrderick, Couno, Long Tow Land Use Plan .............................................................................................................. 10 Li�hihi! C: Eastern L'irderick, Cored), Long Tom, Land Use Plan .............................................................................................................. l l G.�hihi! 0: L:aslern I'rrderir,(: County Road Plan ........................................................................................................................................ 13 L'xhibil 1 : l aslern Pirderick. Couno, Road Plan Cross-Seclions................................................................................................................. 12 Vignrr >: Parerrni// Road TraOic I- o/nines will) 1'rredow Manor Rorudabout............................................................................................. 18 Vignre 6:.Shorl-•l eim Fneedon Alanr Dune Con/igmrn/ron.......................................................................................................................... 19 1'IQnr 6,4: Shorl-"1 ow 2020 All Conrdilions: LOS De/ay and Degree of•Salura/mn............................................................................... 20 I'��nur 613: Shorl-7 eim, 2020 All Conditions: LOS Delap and Degnre of Saluratiau................................................................................. 21 1 rgnr 711: Long -Terra 2026 All Condilions: LOS Delay and Desire of Salmalioa............................................................................... 23 1'inrr 7B: Lo{>;-Teizv 2026 Pill Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree o%.S'alnrrrtinn................................................................................. 24 LIST OF TABLES h.\Iil.I•: 1: 111(()POSImTlt.\I-,I:IC DI•:S1(;N CI1.\RACTFRISTI(:5............................................................................................................... 4 1'.\lil.l•: 2: Raw ROUNDAR( WT PROP( )SIM .\C(:I•:SS SPACING................................................................................... 13 I".\ISI.I•: 3: Srn: Tim) GFNI•:RA•I•ION........................................................................................................................................................ 17 I".\lil.I•: 4: LO\( -"I t:R\l SINiI.I'. I.ANI: ROUNDABOUT CAPACH Y Cl lucK.....................................................................................22 l*.wu;; 5.\: 2026 11APFR\III.I. RI)/URITDO\1 MANOR SIGN;\I, DAILYWARRANT ........................................................................ 25 I".\13I.I•: 511: 2026 P.\PI 10111A. Ru/1'RI•:I•:I)O\l MANOR SIGN;\I. PFAK I IO(IRWARRAN'1•.............................................................26 I'.\ISI.I•: G.\: SI IOR•1•-TFRM PAPHRMII.I. RI)/I-R1::1:DOM MANOR ROUNI)ARO(I•l• I.OS COMPARISONS ....................................... 28 I".\BI.I•:611:LO\(;-hI?R\I PAIT10111.1.IZI)/IRIa?l)U\IMANOR ROUNDABO(1•I. X)SCOMPARISONS ........................................28 \PPGNDICILS APPENDIX _\: PROPERTY OWN] ,R COOMINNI'ION APPENDIX B: A:\SIDRz\ WORKSI II' FTS 0 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pennoni Associates, Inc. has prepared this roundabout justification to provide information for the review and approval of a roundabout at the proposed Papermill Road (VA Route 644) intersection in Frederick County, Virginia east of the 1-81 Corridor. The proposed roundabout is suggested as an alternative to the typical turn lane improvements associated with new development in order to provide initial access to the site with the proposed rezoning Of approximately 47.5 acres. This analysis is intended to examine the local and through traffic characteristics of the proposed facility to support the concept design elements associated with the proposed land use changes to accommodate 300 residential dwelling units at the site build -Out, with access to Papermill Road and to a site connection north to the proposed Madison Village Community, with access to U.S. Route 522. The site was zoned for 70 single-family detached residential units in 2004 for the southern portion of the property (approximately 26.2 acres) with access to Papermill Road. The Original traffic Study methodology was reviewed with VDOT Staunton District staff, and was oriented to update future conditions to support the Short-term and long-term traffic conditions with the revised land use activities. The traffic Study, "Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor," dated October 28, 2014 updated traffic conditions for short-term access with 100 single- family detached residential units and 200 apartment/townhouse residential units for the long-term. Based on the analysis, VDOT requested a separate southbound left turn lane into the site for the initial single-family detached activities. Based on the VDOT design criteria for Papermill Road, the implementation Of the left turn lane would require transitions and Off -site R-O-W which were not available. After reviewing constraints with VDOT and pLn'Slling off' -site R-O-W from the adjacent property owners (See Appendix A), the Applicant revisited the existing geometry constraints and has pursued a design concept for a 3-legged roundabout off -set to allow initial access to the property from Papermill Road. The access concept is shown in Exhibit A for a 140 ft. diameter roundabout. The offset is designed with 40 mph approach curves entering the roundabout to further reduce speeds, in conjunction with the splitter islands, at the new access to the desirable 18-25 mph entering the roundabout. The concept plan satisfies single lane conditions without separate lanes For the site build -out. For the long-term scenario, the roundabout works at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" Or better dl11-ing the peak 1101.11-S. The Frederick County Transportation Plan envisions Papermill Road as a fOL11- lane divided major collector, so the proposed R-O-W is increased on -site to accommodate the ultimate County R-O-W; however since the operations with the Freedom Manor site are acceptable with the single -lane I.01.1ndab011t as shifted, the implementation of the County's ultimate 4 lane corridor will require future off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road. That scenario is not part of the subject roundabout justification. The Frederick County 2030 Comprehensive Policy Plan Map — excerpted in Exhibit B — shows the general vicinity for the corridor between I-81 and Route 522 with the 4 lane major collector, consistent within the VDOT FLlnctional Plan and the regional road plan for Frederick County (see Exhibits C through E). DHOL1404 Page 1 Pennoni 0 0 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 Traffic vOILlnles were used fi•onl the 2014 study and evaluated Using the aaSIDRA roundabout capacity software. Relevant traffic and density tables are excerpted Cronl the October 2014 study to Support the proposed concept. For the capacity analysis, the roundabout operations were reviewed for both short-term and long -terns scenarios. A forth leg to the south was not included since the adjacent property owner representative did not want to sell R-O-W to accommodate road inlprovenlents as noted in the Appendix. The proposed alternative can be refined with the final signing and pavement narking plans for implementation within the proposed geometries. Pennoni recommends that the final COIlfIgUration O( the I.OUndabOUt associated with the rezoning to allow: • Off -set of Papernlill Road to allow a single lane Ioundabout with a 140 diameter • One approach lane entering the I.OUndabOUt front Freedom Manor • Pedestrian and bike accessing a 10 ft. multi -use trail east ol'the existing road. • Acceptable LOS for a single -lane roundabout at LOS 'C' for the long-term forecasts. The concept plan allows improvements to the existing two-lane section Of Papermill Road to acconlnlodate improved access into the Freedom Manor property. The roundabout is an improved alternative to the approved rezoning to allow (OI' Wills Oil SOUthbOUnd Papcn-nill Road, and allow egress from the side street, since signalization is not anticipated to be warranted. DHOL1404 Page 2 Pennoni -1 rmill Road 1 Pennons PENNON[ ASSOCIATES INC. PROPOSED RIGHT OF N.At ..��t NR'J -- -11110- -...� 150' tS-uvu Papermill FREEDOM MANOR 00 0 goo + CONCEPT SCALE: 1" =100' ROUNDABOUT JULY 2015 CONSULTING ENGINEERS i 0 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 Exhibii A: Freedom Alknor Concepi Roundciboui DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 3 • Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 2. INTRODUCTION a) Purpose of Report and Study Objective This analysis SUmmarizes transportation planning elements of'a proposed rOUndabOLlt, in order to provide VDOT with the design justification to support the public improvements. This justification and plan attachments are intended to respond to initial VDOT comments, as well as provide a general summary of the design to satisfy the critciria in the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F. The study analyzes the following scenarios: • Short -Term Site Access (2020) Conditions • Long Term 13Uild-Out plus Six Year (2026) conditions. The October 2014 Traffic Study reviewed the existing, No -Build scenarios, and total conditions with a conventional intersection at Papermill Road and ROLite 522 impacts. The TIA was updated in July 2015 for the revised roundabout concept. The site location is shown in Figure I and the localized access plan for Freedom IVlanor is included in Figure 2. The localized design features of'Papermill Road at the roundabout are summarized in Table 1: TABLE 1: PROPOSED TRAFFIC DESIGN CIIAIZACrERISTICS Papermill Road (VA Routc 644) Frederick County, VA Design Classification: VDOT GS-7 Urban Major Collector Road ADT (2014) 8,810 Projected ADT (2020) 12,250 Projected ADT (2026) 12,840 DI -IV (2026) 1233 D (%) 59% L13 (PM) T (%) 2% I -IV V popl-1) 50 Design Speed (45 Posted Speed Limit) 25 MPH roundabout with 40 M13I-1 approach Curves DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 4 ►01 i — sn �1 •n an n1 n1 �t Winchester 0 11 622 37 S22 am SITE 631 Stephens Cty _ -2 rn r 'aiddletown 1,627`, i 61 1 b&A (,. RD Sky Meadows State Parts I)A, 1-jr, 'I ,.nokic Ala I FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 1 • F .1)\130uTJUSTlH(AiI0l.. SITE LOCATION FREDERICK COUNTY. VA Fi w-e _. Freedom .Llunur Ac•c•ess flan ,y 1 Madison Village Road and Trail Connection to Madison Village )E Road and Trail - ' / Con,nefiibn to -- )![ 63»A-145 doomJ w :.JL - -65 1 1 - / 1 1 iestw0od Drive-7- 7 1� North/South Proposed 1 Connector Road 10. 'Nail 1 or Hike ILne' Proposed Proposed Roundabout — y 10• Trail A NProposed 'Q R/11 Dedication 0 Is Shenandoah A o Memorial Park SUBJECT PROPERTY Existing J Signal FREEDOM MANOR PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 0 I y Generalized Development Plan 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 a VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, NRC/NIA Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 The localized study area is in the Shawnee Magisterial District of Frederick County. The County covers an area of approximately 416 square miles and has a population estimated at 78,305 (2010 Census). A description of the study area roadways in the vicinity of the site is provided below: Panel -mill Road (Route 644): Is ail approximately 1.5 mile roadway that starts within the City of Winchester and continues in a southeasterly direction ending at Route 522. It is 2-lane undivided and considered an urban minor collector by VDOT. Papermill Road carried an ADT of 7,600 vehicles in 2013 according to VDOT estimates. The speed limit in the study area is 45 mph. Existing traffic conditions in the Study area are shown in Figure 3. a) Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit facilities Sidewalks are not located along Papermill Road within the study area. A proposed shared use path is suggested along the site frontage with the rezoning with the new roadway. b) Existing Land Use Figure 4 from the Traffic Study shows the existing land use activities adjacent to Papermill Road. The site is undeveloped north of' Route 644. To the south, the area across from the site is in agricultural use. To the southeast of the site, the Shenandoall Memorial Park is located at the Papermill Road curve west of Evendale Lane and extends cast to US Route 522, with driveways to Papermill Road and Route 522. DHOL1404 Page 7 Pennoni ■E 0,010 Proposed roundabout location CD 16,430 Approximate Site Boundary 0 'I T �I 2� SITE ° I 16,430 �I srn: LEGEND N STUDY INTERSECTIONS I 1 f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAYADT Ya Route 64A) 810 Road ( 17.770 t3. 0 1 _ r F I !� Papermill Road ° V (Route 644) 1t 62(121).0 130 (372) N ; a a Juste= 2, 0 s— rro c 118 (70) t� 50(41) Justes Drive v tx iE ry F r O M_ y O r o -- ci FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 3 ROUNDABOUT JUSTIFICATION TRAFFIC VOLUMES """"{°a FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A7gen120/5 FREEDOM MANOR • kt,( ,u-\iit,t I it sn, a „1(). NEARBY LAND USES FREDERICK COUNTY, VA • is Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification c) Future Land Use Changes August 12, 2015 Exhibit B shows the proposed Comprehensive Plan for the immediate vicinity adjacent to the Freedom Manor site. The Plan anticipates that the site be developed as residential, (yellow) and high density residential (crosshatch green -brown) with transition to employment uses (green crosshatch) adjacent to the 1-81 corridor west. Land south of Papermill Road is proposed as park area. Exhibit B: Eastern Frederick County Long Term Land Use Plan Source: Frederick County, Amended June 13. 2012 d) Transportation Plan iooa R-91 L♦nd U. Pl— Q rr w c�.r, or 0 •®o ® r. � rrr w o...rwr u�w cwr. ~ •uorwed ).i. 14M Nn Exhibit C is provided to show the County's existing road Functional Plan uses in the Eastern Plan area. Papermill Road is a major collector. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 10 • Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification Exhibit C: Eastern Frederick County Long Term Land Use Plat Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14. 2011 e) Future Roadway Changes is August 12, 2015 VA Existing Conditions Street Functional Classifications O%p E.Presswov O\p Interstate 0\p Rtald Arterial ORk.I P tenor Arterial ^/ I,llor collector O\,, Alrior Colleclor —\_ local Rd *—'Urban Development Area OESSewer and Water Service Area <D RuralCommunityCenter u)0 CO prlhM9 P011cy PI.. Mip 1 ♦pp,wOd: )uly lath, 2011 : Mill The street through Freedom Manor is proposed as a local street. The County transportation plan envisions a parallel corridor —Warrior Drive Extended —to be constructed west of the site to provide through access east of 1-81 to the future Tevis street extension corridor. The County Plan also envisions the existing curve of Papermill Road to the south of Freedom Manor (adjacent to the Shenandoah Memorial Park Cemetery) to be realigned to the south to opposite the Justes Drive signal. However, these roadway changes are not funded and are not included in the roundabout justification. The Eastern Area Road Plan is shown in Exhibit D with the cross - sections summarized in Exhibit E. Papermill Road is envisioned as U4D section in the study area as an improved major collector. DHOL1404 Page 11 • Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification C� August 12, 2015 ,.e:: `tea J: 3. o , / •% 1\/ 5224# / Eastern Road Plan - )an 2011 n / • ♦/,/' 1 ' , �/-, __.. Major Arterial It ' / v Improvad Major Arterial New Minor Arterial Improved Mmor Arterial ` no ,. _ , �� New Major Collector Improved Major Collector ♦ i New Minor Collector ,�7tt.✓ /0"N_, Improved Minor Colector RAMP Trails Trails Exhibit D: Eastern Frederick Count 1, Road Plan -,, Future Rt 3' avpass Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 eUrban Development area &—r and Water Ser. , -'ea RuralCommunRyCertef T • • / `� Eastern Road Plan y„s22' Cross Sections A "w Future Rt 37 Bvpass •'$Urban Development Area Sewer and Water service Area i - Ruralcommunitvicenter -- 522 _030 C.rnp, 11.— e..v Clan May _ , 1 eonw�a'>uh l�rn, 'ors Fxhihit E: Eastern Frederick Couniv Road Man Cross -Sections 05 _ Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 DHOL1404 Page 12 Piennoni 0 0 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 I) Access Management Spacing The proposed access plan would satisfy the VDOT access management guidelines for a Collector Road, as classified by VDOT functional Classification with a 35-45 MPH speed limit. See Table 2 for dimensions, consistent with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F criteria. TABLE 2: PAPERMILL ROAD ROUNDABOUT PROPOSED ACCESS SPACING Street Papermill Road Direction West Spacing — 665 Notes To I larrison 1 aric. t\pproximatcly 1,700 ft to Caldwell Lane cast of the I-81 over )ass . South —1,250 To driveway to 3790 Papermill Rd (Parcel 26) and app. 2,500 ft COI VanClalC L.aI1C. \'DOT :\ccess Management Road Design MarlUal z\ppetidix l "Table 2-2 Criteria Roundabout Spacing 440 Collector (35 to 45 NIPH Legal Speed Limit) (Signalized and Unsignalized intersections Therefore, the subject roundabout would not require access waivers. To the west, the first signal is located in the City Of Winchester west of Shawnee Drive at the East Tevis Street/South Pleasant Valley Road intersection, or over 1.7 miles from the subject roundabout. The future extension Of Warrior Drive would not create access management spacing conflicts with the proposed roundabout. To the east, the adjacent signal is at the Route 522 Intersection, or 4,150 ft. from the subject roundabout. g) Proposed Concept Plan The proposed roundabout design with roundabout 140 feet dlarricter Is shown In Exhibit A, based on the design concepts developed with the TORUS roundabout software, which develops designs to accommodate heavy vehicle turns and general pavement edges. For the subject site, Pennoni added R-O-W based on County and VDOT requirements for Papermill Road. The extension into the Freedom Manor site is shown Or road engineering only and will vary with design after the proposed splitter island. Due the desire to avoid off -site R-O-W south Of Papermill Road, the ROUIe 644 centerlines were CUrved north as shown with a radius Of'593 ft. (40 MPH design) to shift the roadway approaching tile 1'OUndabOUt. The centerlines are Off -set ill the I.OU► dabOUt to redUce the entry speeds for through traffic. DHOL1404 Page 13 Pennoni • Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 3. DESIGN ELEMENTS The design criteria and typical sections used for the roundabout concept design are outlined below for consideration by VDOT. The design speed proposed is at 50 MPH, with operations within the roundabout at approximately 25 MPH. Design Vehicle: The WB-67 Modified (wheel base of 41 Icet) design for trucks and buses will be accommodated with the proposed roundabout. "file modifications reflect the Virginia State law niaxinlum length to approximate a WB-65 design vehicle. Approach Grades and Sight Distances: Papermill Road to/front Freedom Manor has a downgrade of approximately I percent from the north and south. Inscribed Outer Diameter of the Circulatory Roadway: The inscribed diameter for the proposed roundabout is at 140 feet. Apron Composition, Width, Slope and Curb Standard: "File truck apron is proposed as concrete with the CUrb acconiniodat►ng the VDOT CG-3 nlod►f ►ed design. Circulatory Lane Width: Shown at 18 feet. Approach Lane Width, Deflection and Radii: Lane widths shown at 16-18 feet clear. The entering radii on Paperniill Road are shown at approximately 100 feet. Departure Lane Width, Deflection and Radii: Lane widths shown at 16-18 feet clear. The departure lanes at Papermill Road in Exhibit A allow for a radius at the exit of 200 feet on Papermill Road and exiting Freedoni Manor. Proposed Pedestrian Crossing Locations: The pedestrian crossings are shown approximately 20 feet back from the outer edge froni the Circulatory lane on the north side only to accommodate a 10 ft. shared use trail.. To the south, the edge of pavenient is niaintained without pedestrian access. Bicycle Lane Approach/Termination point:. No in road facilities are provided. Pavement Marking: The signing and marking plans will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines and be included with final design. Signing: The signing will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines and be included with final design. DHOL1404 Page 14 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 The pavement markings and signs will comply with the Federal Highway Administration 2009 edition of the klanual on Unifa-m Ti afJic ConU•ol Devices, the VDOT Suhhlement to the Alf UTCD, and NCFIRP Report 672 Roirnclahouts: An !?formational Guide (2"d Edition) 2010. Roadway Lighting- Roadway lighting is proposed with this project. Nearest Entrance Locations, and Nature of Property Use- TO the west, the nearest street is at Harrison Street, a local street, or approximately 665 feet to the northwest, as measured from the outside edge of'the inscribed circle to the centerline of the side street. To the east, the roundabout is approximately 2,410 feet from Evendale Lane. As noted, the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan envisions SUbUrban and medium density residential north of Papermill Road and park uses to the south Of Route 644. Employment uses are envisioned to the west adjacent to I-81. Present & Design Year Volumes — See Section 4 for the derivation and methodology on traffic forecasts. Figure 5 summarizes the design year forecast. aaSIDRA analysis LOS/Queues: See Section 4 for LOS and queues lengths. The LOS is acceptable as a single -lane roundabout. Proximity of roundabout to nea►•est signal: The U.S. Route 522 intersection is approximately 4,100 linear ('eet (If) from the proposed rOLIndabout and is Signalized. To the west, the nearest existing signal is in the City at South Pleasant Valley Road, approximately 1.7 1t. from the proposed roundabout. For the long-term conditions, it' Warrior Drive is constructed as planned parallel to I-81, the spacing from the roundabout to the signal would exceed feet. DHOL1404 Page 15 Pennoni 11 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The October 2014 study addressed growth, background conditions and local development anticipated with the Freedom Manor site volumes for the Papermill Road and Route 522 corridors. The following sections outline relevant resources used for the roundabout capacity evaluation. a) Traffic Growth As part of the traffic analyses for the short and long-term conditions, the changes in traffic included other local development Including the Madison Village site, Frederick County High School site, and a growth rate of 1.5 percent annually was assumed for the analysis Of years of 2020 and 2026, in the traffic study. Traffic volumes were determined based on the western link volumes at the Route 522 signal with Papermill Road and extended as thrOUghs past the subject site. The proposed Freedom Manor location does not have any adjacent public street or private entrances adjacent to the frontage, so the continuation of the through volumes should be accurate. The entrance to the cemetery and the Evandale Lane connection are the only major traffic generator sources between the site end Route 522. For 2020, Papermill Road is anticipated to accommodate 11,410 VPD, while the 2026 scenario estimated 12,310 VPD adjacent to the site. b) Site Traffic The proposed Freedom Manor site -generated trips were calculated using traffic generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 9'1' Edition, 2012, as well as VDOT Staunton District requirements that require 80% of' the trips for townhomes and apartments to be calculated using VDOT local rates. The project is planned to be built in two phases, with Phase 1 (2020) consisting of 100 single-family residential dwelling units and Phase 2 (2026) consisting of'a mix of 200 townhomes and apartment residential dwelling units. Table 3 shows the weekday AM and PM peak hour and daily trips generated by the proposed project for the two phases, with the values used in the analysis boxed. The values outside the boxes are shown for comparison. DHOL1404 Page 16 Pennoni i� LJ Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TAI3LE 3: SITE TKIP GENERATION —. _: PEAK 1111r'/r 11 I I E Land Uso(1) 1.11 PE"A K 11Ur7f /'?1 COPE ,'tiler: nr,vrn r r,rr. rce by tine rnrv, !n — urn' ruru. ( 2-nn Trip Generation By Right 210 210 I'M 70 DU Single-Fan1 Ikl (\'DO'I-) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables PII:ISr. 1 (2020) 210 210I70 100 DU e SF Res rr 100 DU (usingEQUATION) 20 GO ;t0 57 34 91 1,05(1 210 210 IM 100 DU Single-Fam. Det (usmgAVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 111II1.D-OUT (2026) 230 2rolra 200 DU Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 15 73 98 70 34 I(bl 1,172 230 _(1 I90 .10 DU a THRes@40DU (usingEQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 211 Uq 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 83 47 130 1,303 'rolal 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Poak Hnur PM Peak Hour Dilly !:%!',rive I'rgr Huns (2.3) 2-wa C W—A (2-w-iv) %1.1-- Weekday 210 Single -Kant IX-1 0,I)OII Dll 076 2i". I III 63"6 RIM 210 SFRes a IIs1DU DU Oxls 2i"„ 09] 6P- Iui(I A\1 210 single -Fans DcI DU 075 29'1. 1M 63"" 9i2 A\7! 230 Toonheuse Ull 011 17"„ 032 67'. i96 230 111 Res o 10 DU Ull 061 16,.. 070 (W. 7 25 ro—h—'e(VDOI Suunton Deslnet Rate) DU 063 21"" 0 x I (W., x II TRIP RATE SOURCE Trip Generation Manual (91h Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012 Aserage trip rates used, unless noted wth'e', then equations used at size shown, w ilh data set OK for R2 > 0 75 AND SO > 110 % of aw (1) ITE Land Code shown as the first 3 digits Decimal shown for internal use by Ponnonl for lookup table for trip fate variable (2) Effective trip rates calculated by land use For avenge rites = (Density) x (ave. trip rite) = 2-vny Trips x (inbound perce—ge) for Trips In For ITE equations, 'e' noted = (Density) x ( trip equation) = 2--sy Trips x (inbound percenuge) for Trips In (3) Assumed SO % of townhouses at Staunton DQslnct effective Rates for lownhouso, condo, or apartment The site trip generation of approximately 2,650 ADT was assigned to the roadway network as documented in the traffic impact study for the land use application. "Traffic assignments were based on two scenarios: • Short-term 2020 with 100 SF DU and Only access to Papermill Road • Long -terns 2026 with site build -out and an interparcel connection through the Madison Village site to US Route 522 north. The interparcel connection between the Freedom Manor and Madison Village to the north was assumed to be open for 2026 total conditions, giving trips for both developments a choice between two entrances. Consequently, Madison Village and Freedom Manor traffic assignments needed to be altered for localized diversions. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 17 • • 2020 SHORT-TERM T x - ��, Y c :7 12 (7) 48(27) Site Fntrancc 1,050 � v V N � Y N VOLUMES 0 E B (B) U � r/= C (D) Site Entrance OVERALL ICU = A (A) LOS WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION A (B) m A (A) Q Site Entrance � v E 5 O G C4 Q OVERALL 2 LOS = A (B) ME LOS WITH ROUNDABOUT Approximate Site Boundary LEGEND I t e TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,IIU(1 WEEKDAYADT LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) 2026 LONG-TERM O 72* c C x 113 (61) r Site Entrance 3,180 'J X Y P K N VOLUMES �B(B) c FD C (E) Site Entrance rt 4� J Cr v OVERALL a ICU = A (A) LOS WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION Site Entrance ti rt OVERALL d' LOS =A(B) A(B) LOS WITH ROUNDABOUT FREEDOM MANOR PAPERMILL ROAD TRAFFIC FIGURE 5 ROUNDABOUT JUSTIFICATION VOLUMES WITH FREEDOM MANOR ,)NI„ 1404 FREDERICK COt1NTY, VA ROUNDABOUT 4ugus) 2015 • • Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 c) Future Traffic Volumes with Freedom Manor Roundabout With the proposed site access, the Daily volumes on Papermill Road are anticipated to increase to 12,250 VPD in 2020, and up to 12,800 in 2026. Freedom Manor access is anticipated to accommodate 1,050 VPD north of Papermill Road in the short-term and approximately 3,200 VPD in the long-term with build -out as a local street. d) Short-term Traffic Operations The summary of peak hour trips for the short- term and long-term traffic at the roundabout is included in Figure 5. The graphic shows both scenarios with the site, the peak hour volumes at the roundabout and the LOS by approach for the single lane roundabout. The aaSIDRA worksheets for 2020 and 2026 conditions with the site are included in Appendix B of this report. An assessment of the projected volumes on Papermill Road determined single lane approaches could be adequate. Figure 6 shows the lane configuration tested for the short-term traffic volumes. D.D«.�i rtold 1" C ''. r 1 A r DIJMrt*II DDld Figure 6: Short -Term Freedom Manor Lane Configuration The results of the analysis show the Papermill Road approaches operating at a LOS "A" in the AM peak and at a LOS "B" during the PM peak hour under the projected 2020 traffic volumes. The degree of saturation for all movements is at 0.50 or better, well below the DHOL1404 P06FIN A% Page 19 • Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification 9 August 12, 2015 capacity of the roundabout. Figures 6A and 6B show the delay and degree of saturation for the AM and PM Peak hours, respectively. DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermili Road at Site Entrance New Sic Roundabout All Movarseltll s Soto; Eld NaAt Ylhlsr daft I ae de 7-4 8-0 — LOS I A A A A DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capac6y (via ratio) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermi8 Road at Site Entrance Roundabout All Movement Ctas ses Sc-_.h Eas Nall MM &4—tt . 047 & l C 0.3E 0.47 IL DapermYl Road Papermill Road L 9,9L C 5 010� ® t .— — I •. W 66r c. 010� I �a,rrr ;,ad Pape"M Road , t- Li? Tr 1r Colas ode or. _ever of Swwee —0--�—Q Calour code oaseamDegree of 'saewffian LOS A LOS 8 LOB C LOS D LOS E L05 F Cont—ous —®—_--� [<0.91 [06-0.7] [0.7-0.8] [0.8-(Lg] [0.8-10] [>1.0] Contnuous Figure 6A: Short -Term 2020 AM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 20 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification E August 12, 2015 DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (secondsl V Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New S,te Roundabout AN-1 ' Ctaslrs So a Ead North Interswoon 9.2 - 6.1- 13.4 tt_I LOS A A 0 8 PapermNl Road VI)e Papenmlll Road it Colour code bow on Lev* d Sevce LOS A LOS a LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS i Corfu DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vic ratio) ® Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement classes South East North Intersection. 0.5C 0.0C 0.67 0.87 L 067 �51 Papermlll Road Pape"# Road Colour code & [<0.81 [0.8-0.7) 10.7-0-81 10.8-0.81 (0.8-t.01 I>"I Caron — Figure 6B: Short -Term 2020 PM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation e) Long-term Traffic Operations A single lane roundabout was checked based on the HCM 2010/FHWA Roundabout Guidelines, as summarized in Table 4. Consistent with the aaSIDRA analysis, both the AM and PM volumes from Figure 5 are below the approach and conflicting capacity of a single lane roundabout. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 21 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 4: LONG-TERM SINGLE LANE ROUNDABOUTCAPACITY CHECK FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, Equation 4-3, Operations One -Lane Roundabout AM Conflicting Lane Entering Volume OK? Volume Capacity (lu EB 0 456 716 OK W B 212 404 754 0 K N B 441 57 1067 0 K SB 357 99 1023 OK PM Conflicting Lane Entering Volume OK? Volume Capacity (lu EB 0 779 519 OK WB 116 448 722 OK N B 542 100 1022 OK SB 724 55 1070 OK NOTE: No adjustments for Heavy Vehicle Flow or PHF in estimates. All entries are pc/hr (Passenger car equivalents). The proposed lane configurations for the 2026 conditions remain the same as the short-term scenario. No new legs were added and the Papermill Road widening as envisioned in the County COnlprehensive Plan has not been initiated. Instead the roundabout was tested with additional U11.11ing traffic at the I'rccclo111 Manor intcrscction, and with extra growth to veri y IF the single lane i'OUnclabOUt Is adequate. File alternative design would be to add separate left and I'Ight U11'I1 lanes oil Papermill Road as a conventional intersection. L0S was InClUded in the original traffic study. figures 7A and 713 show the delay and degree of saturation For the Aivl and PM Peak hours, respectively, for the long-term tralfIc scenario. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 22 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification is DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) ® Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes z.�t East Nash it-seckm 9A 8s 8.8 n< AJ A A A IL Papermill Road C ( . I PapenniM Road 89 rS9 v c 0 9.4L c L 94� ;n Cclo�, -bde of Se,, e LOSA LOS 9 LOS C LOS D LOS E LOS F Continuous August 12, 2015 DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vic ratio) V Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout AN Movement Classes South East Worth creersectim 6.47 0.33 0.41 0.47 Papema Road \\ }dt 0.33� d 033� I I Papemli0 Road r Cobur code eased a+ � of Saturation [<0.81 [0.8-0.71 10.7-0.81 (0.9-0.91 [0.9-13] 1>t.o1 Continuous Figure 7A: Long -Term 2026 AM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation The results of the analysis show acceptable operation during both AM and PM peak hours under the projected 2026 traffic volumes. The AM approaches all operate at LOS "A", while the PM peak conditions operate at LOS "A" exiting Freedom Manor. Through traffic on Papermill Road operates at a LOS "B-C" conditions. The worst performing approach is projected to be eastbound Papermill Road (north leg), operating at LOS "C" during the PM peak hour with a saturation level at less 0.80. This scenario recognizes that the design as suggested does have capacity for increased traffic without widen to a multi -lane roundabout. DHOL1404 Pennon" Page 23 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification • August 12, 2015 DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) ® Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance _ New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes Souh Fast North Intersection 12.1 7.7 18.0 14.8 LOS 8 A C e IL �aFierr^rll Road I.J • W -1apermlll Road Ir 7.7 t 77r E LOS F Corrunullls DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Vokr to Capacity (vlc ratio) V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entranra New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes Soup East Nam interectw 0.9C 0.19 0.77 0.77 Papermill Road a Papermill Rcad Galcur rode based on Degree of won [c(La ] ]0.E-0.7] 10.7-0.81 (08-3- 1 jig— S] 7 Cn H: ooas Figure 7B: Long -Term 2026 PM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation 5. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Based on the procedures described in the Manuel of Traffic Signal Design published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Pennoni has reviewed alternative traffic operations as unsignalized control. As noted in the summary, adding turn lanes and shifting the Papermill Road centerline to accommodate a left turn lane transition would require off -site frontage along the feet long frontage. Without off -site R-O-W, this implementation would not be able to be implemented without modifications or waivers of VDOT design criteria. Pennoni did also check if signalization at the site entrance may be pursued as an alternative to mainline turn lanes on Papermill Road with traffic signal warrant analysis for the subject roundabout. DHOL1404 Page 24 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 For the signal analysis, Pennoni reviewed daily and peak holm volume thresholds to verify if signalization Could be Considered. Overall, the signalization would not be satisfied, assuming a 50% right turn on red option for the Freedom Malloy side Street tllrI1S. Tables 5A and 5B show the long-term Daily and Peak Hour signal warrants. TART r FA- 9.026 PAPT?RTvfll.T. Rrl/FRT T?T1nM MANOR SIGNAL DAILY WARRANT Intersection: Papermill Road & Site Entrance Analysis Year: 2026 Total Conditions (50% RTOR) Signal Warrant Type: ITE Daily Warrant EADT Major EADT Minor 12,805 vpd 781 vpd Urban: Yes Rural: no Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher 1. Minimum Vehicular Warrant Unsatisfied street (total of both approaches) wlume minor street (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach .Ulf- Snrr/ .Iluro V/.rr/ 1 'dnnr Iburd ("Al" Rural 1 x 1 x 8,000 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more 1 9,600 6,720 2,400 1.680 2 or more 2 or more 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 or more 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher Traffic Warrant Unsatisfied street (total of both approaches) wlume minor street (one direction only) Number of lanes for moung traffic on each approach .linrnr f/rrrr 1'rhneFri limn( 1'r/am Ibnn( .11gnr .1'/rrd 1 x 1 x 12.000 8,400 1,200 850 2 or more 1 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more 2 or more 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 or more 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Unsatisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied but following warrants f^l fulfilled 80% or more ❑ 1 ❑ 2 (') Major Street EADT-Total of Both Approaches (") Minor Street EADT- Higher Volume approach. Half of ADT EADT=Estimated Average Daily Traffic Note: 1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if separate signal phase is to be prouded for the left -turn movements 2. To be used only for new intersections or other locations where actual traffic wlumes cannot be counted. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers' (I IE) Manual of I rarrlc �;lgnal uesrgn DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 25 0 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification 0 August 12, 2015 TABLE 5B: 2026 PAPERMILL KD/FREE DOM MANOR SIGNAL PEAK HOUlt WARRAN 1 Intersection: Papermill Road & Site Entrance Analysis Year: 2026 Total Conditions (50% RTOR) Signal Warrant Type: MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant 600 500 MINOR STREET •100 HIGHER - VOLUME 300 APPROACH- VPH 200 100 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 2 OR MORE OEM, 150' 100' 400 500 600 700 t 900 1000 1 0 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 803 1,153 MAJOR S1 —TOTAL OF BO H APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 160 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-stroot approach with two or more lanes and 100 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor -street approach with one lane. Source: MUTCD Signal Warrants - Warrant 3 - Figure 4CA Analysis: Pennoni Associates, Inc. AM Peak • PM Peak,*,, Major Street - Papermill Rd. Total of Both Approaches: 798 VPH Minor Street -Site Entrance Higher Volume Approach: 155 VPH DHOL1404 Pennoni 1,266 VPH WARRANT NOT SATISFIED X 85 VPH Page 26 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 6. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS As previously noted and shown in Exhibit A and the level of services in Figures 6A through 713, the Papermill Road/Freedom Manor site access intersection can function as a single lane roundabout, as an alternative to adding left and right turn lanes On Route 644. The addition of a roundabout would provide improved access and allows for a design to be implemented with the initial phase of development. Under the existing zoning approvals, a left turn lane was not provided with the approved access, so geometric improvements associated with the upgraded in land use entitlement provide a superior access plan, in relation to the existing approvals for 70 single family detached homes. The roundabout design concept does recognize a shift in the location Of the intersection, in order to assist in the traffic calming along Route 644. The off -set intersection allow for through traffic on Papermill Road eastbound to slow down from the west as they approach the roundabout, and avoid higher speeds within the circle, or traffic Cutting through the roundabout with the splatters and island. The radii proposed and the general configuration'are suggested as a concept to allow the roundabout to be constructed as part of'the initial development of the site, without requiring off -site R-O-W south Of Papermill Road. For the zoning entitlement, the developers request VDOT and the County support the alternative roundabout in order to allow the application to continue. The alternative satisfies VDOT criteria and allows for ultimate dedication for a half section Of' a 4 lane divided facility along Papermill Road, should the County/VDOT or others pursue widening in the future. The roundabout will provide excellent traffic operations For the short- and long term scenarios with the proposed rezoning. A comparison Of the roundabout LOS with LOS delay and degree Of saturation is summarized in Table 6A for the short-term and Table 6B for the long-term forecasts, with a comparison to the conventional unsignalized intersection operations with turns lanes. "file roundabout maintain LOS at LOS "C" or better for all movements as a single lane roundabout. Therefore the roundabout would provide adequate access for the site, and will provide an alternative to off -site R-O-W, to allow safe access to the property with initial development. DHOL1404 Page 27 Pennoni Lj 0 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 6A: SHORT-TERM PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS Traffic Control Lane Group/ Approach1 Ali Peak flour I'd1 Peak flour I.OS- Delay- (in sec) Back of : Queue (in reef Uegree of SalurlUorr, : L.OS = Dchry (in sec) Back 2 of Queue (in feet Degree of Saturation, WI3/1. C 18 3 25 1) 26.4 25 W13/R 13 115 25 B 114 0 \\'l3 LOS C 16.9 - C 23.3 - NWIR A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 Urniuitived N 13 LOS :1 0.0 - - A 0.0 - - S13/1. A 8.4 0 A 8.5 0 Sl3rf A 0.0 0 A 00 0 S13 LOS A 11.1 - A 0.1 - ICl", A 34.9% - A 43.7 G, - WBIR A 6.6 25 0.10 A 6.1 25 0.06 Wl3 LOS A 6.6 - 0.10 A 6.1 - 0.06 NBrIR A 8.6 70 0.47 A 9.2 80 0.50 Rowxlabot Nl3 LOS A 8.6 - 0.47 ,\ 9.2 - 0.50 S13/1,T A 7.4 43 036 13 13.4 1,15 0.67 S13 LOS A 7.4 - 0.36 13 13.4 0.67 ChcrtO A 1 8.0 0.47 11 8.8 O.G7 (1) 1:13 = liastlxwnd, W13=\Vesttxwnd, NI3 = Nonhlxwnd. SI3 = SouthWund, 1.: Lell, T:Ihnl, R: Right (2) Unsign:dved %ahres calcubaed with IIC'\I methodology using Synchro 8. SIDRA used for roundaxna. (3) Intersection Capacity UtilL:uion TABLE 6B: LONG-TERM PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT' LOS COMPARISONS 7laffic Control lane Glut# Approachi A11 Veak floor I'\t Peak flour LOS' Dclny, (in sec) 11nel( of a Queue (in feet) Uegrec of : S11turrtion : LOS Ucla},, (in sec) Back � of Queue (in feet Degree of : Salutation W13/1. C 23.9 40 li 45.3 45 WBIR B 123 25 13 11.8 25 1V13 LOS C 17.7 - 1) 27.7 - NI3(h A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 Utsiandized v N13IR A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 N 11 LOS A 0.0 A 0.0 - SB1I. A 8.4 25 A 8.7 0 S131f A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 S13 LOS A 1.3 - A 1.2 - ICl A 40.1 `% - A 42.8% - - WBILR A 9A 33 0.33 A 7.7 25 0,19 W13 LOS A 9.4 - 0.33 A 7.7 0.19 NIFIR A 8.9 65 0.47 13 12.1 103 0.60 Rowxiabout 13 LOS :\ 8.9 - 13.47 13 12.1 1 - 0.60 S131-T A 8.4 50 0.41 C 18.0 205 0.77 Sf3 LOS A 8.4 0.41 C 18.0 0.77 Overall :\ 8.8 0.47 13 14.8 0.77 (1) EI3 = Eastbound, W13 =Westbound. N13 = Northbound. S13 ^m Southlxwnd, I.: Lell, T: flu u, R: Right (2) Unsignalizecl values calculated with 11C\I ntethexhrlo&T using Synchro 8. SIDRA used lbr roundabout. (3) Interseclk)o Capacity U111i : lion. DHOL1404 Pennons Page 28 APPENDIX Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 APPENDIX A: ADJACENT PROPERTY OW/7VER COORDINA TION FOR PAPERMILL RD Pennoni 0 • April 30, 2015 Mr. Dennis A. Dysart, Member Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC 112 W. King Street Strasburg, VA 22657 Dear Mr. Dysart, I have consulted with both Greenway Engineering and Attorney William A. Truban regarding the below summarized proposals to improve Papermill Road for the Freedom Manor subdivision. The first proposal Included the construction of a roundabout on Papermill Road at the Freedom Manor entrance, as well as the design and construction of an entrance on the roundabout for future access by the Haldeman Property (this option required a 0.31 acre of right of way dedication by the Trust). The second proposal included the construction of turn lanes at the Freedom Manor entrance on Papermill Road, including the design and construction of a southbound left turn lane serving Freedom Manor and a northbound left turn lane to serve any future access to the Haldeman Property (this option required a 0.63 acre right of way dedication by the Trust). Please accept this letter as confirmation that the Paul M. Haldeman, Jr. Trust respectfully declines your $100,000 offer to obtain the right of way necessary for either proposal. Sincerely, (�)ak '-M � erna.t�i Co iI-Uske Paul M. Haldeman, Jr., Grantor and Co -Trustee Paul M. Haldeman, Jr. Trust Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 APPENDIX B: AASIDRA WORKSHEETS Pennoni FREEDOM MANOR - IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT Revised November 2015 The following is a summary of the proposed rezoning of Freedom Manor (the "Property") to the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District to provide for up 300 dwelling units on 47.5 acres located east and adjacent to Papermill Road, approximately '/2 mile north/west of the intersection of Papermill Road and Route 522. Proposed Development The proposed development plan is depicted on the attached Exhibit A. As shown, the project would consist of two phases that would provide for a maximum of 300 total dwelling units served by a north/south connector road extending from a proposed roundabout at the project entrance on Papermill Road through the site and to the northern project limits where it would connect with the transportation network approved for the adjoining Madison Village project. Phase 1, located on the southern portions of the Property, is approximately 33.68 acres in size and would consist of a maximum of 100 single family dwelling units. Phase 2 would be comprised of the remaining 13.66 acres at the northern limits of the Property and consist of a maximum of 200 dwelling units which could be single family attached, apartments, or a combination thereof. The proposed Proffer Statement also provides an option to utilize Frederick County's Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program in order to construct any of the proposed dwelling units. The TDR option could be utilized in lieu of the proposed monetary proffers, as the TDR option mitigates impacts by transferring development rights from elsewhere in the County, but all other proffers including those relating to site use and layout would remain unchanged under the TDR option, thus ensuring a cohesive project. A location map is attached as Exhibit B. As shown, the project is located between Papermill Road and Route 522 near the existing signalized intersection of the two roadways. Adjoining land to the south, zoned RA, is the current Shenandoah Memorial Park. Lands adjoining the site to the east are generally single family detached uses zoned RA and RP. To the north of the site is the recently approved Madison Village project, zoned RP and slated for up to 640 dwelling units as a mixture of apartments and townhomes. Additional RA zoned lands are located west and adjacent to the Property and are planned for high density residential and public park uses by the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan (the "Comprehensive Plan"). Site Location The project is comprised of three tax map parcels identified as 64-A-19, 20, and 23 and is a mixture of RP and RA zoning currently. The attached Exhibit C provides a summary of the existing zoning for the project. As shown, the southernmost 26.87 acres is zoned RP and represents an area that was rezoned to the RP district in 2005 to provide for up to 70 single family dwelling units. The 2005 rezoning application proposed access at both Papermill Road as well as to Route 522 through an adjoining property. This new rezoning application would remove the direct access to Route 522, which would be preferred from an access management perspective, and also expand the area of the project to the north to include an adjoining 20.63 acres. As shown on Exhibit C, this Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 1 Exhibit A 1 LEGEND Site ❑Project (47.54 Ac) Ex. Freedom Manor Zoned RP (26.87 Ac) Ex. RP Zone (6.81 Ac) Ex. RA Zoning (13.86 Ac) 1 L Planned Roadways so I/ I ^r' Madison Village Connection at , Madison Village 1 Interparcel I Connection Proposed Entrance A �0 co � J �y 600 300 0 600 (IN FEET) 1 inch = 600 ft. FREEDOM MANOR Exhibit C - Existing Zoning fW-DERICK COUNTY. kIRC/N/A � .cn N Proposed 4*3 --North/South1--j Connector. Road Shenandoah Memorial Park l—� Existing Signal I PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E. Picadill St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 adjoining acreage is a mixture of 6.81 acres of existing RP zoning (without proffers currently) and 13.86 acres of RA zoning. Site Characteristics Attached Exhibit D depicts the existing site conditions. The Property is currently vacant aside from some fencing and small outbuildings. Two ponds are located on the subject Property. Any wetland areas located on the property are limited to areas associated with the two existing ponds. There are no mapped floodplains on the Property. As depicted on Exhibit D, The site has a high elevation of 745 feet and a low elevation of approximately 720 feet with existing slopes generally in the 2-5 percent range. The majority of the site drains from west to east. Soils on the site are identified as Blairton silt loams, Clearbrook channery silt loams, and Weikert-Berks channery silt loams. The characteristics of this soil type and any implications for site development are manageable through the site engineering process. Comprehensive Plan The Property is located wholly within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). Further, the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan (the "Land Use Plan") identifies the southern portions of the site for "Residential" land uses intended for 4 units per acre. The Land Use Plan identifies the intended use of the northern portions of the Property for "High Density Residential" uses at a density of 12-16 units per acre. The proposed development plan for the Property recognizes the planned land uses included in the Comprehensive Plan. Phase 1 of the project is proposed at a density of approximately 3.4 units per acre, consistent with the "Residential" planned land use identified by the Comprehensive Plan. Phase 2 is proposed at a density of up to 14.4 units per acre, which is consistent with the "High Density Residential" land use as specified by the Comprehensive Plan. Access and Transportation Access to the Property would be provided by a single access point on Papermill Road utilizing an off -set roundabout design. The initial traffic study for the project assumed a typical entrance on Papermill Road. However, the relatively narrow existing right of way for Papermill Road precluded the construction of a southbound left turn lane to accommodate traffic heading south on Papermill Road and turning into the site. The Applicant approached the adjoining property owner across Papermill Road to seek additional right of way necessary to construct the turn lane or a typical four way roundabout, which would also accommodate the turn movements. The adjoining property owner respectfully declined offers by the Applicant to purchase right of way for either of those improvements. In order to safely accommodate turning movements at the project entrance, the Applicant has revised the TIA and prepared an associated Roundabout Justification Study, attached as Appendix A and Appendix 8, respectively. These two studies are referred to collectively as the "TIA." Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 2 Ive • # y Exi g �� I• ` ,, �' • f' -� •��� � .� � fly A V 4 `wood rivo D �4 - _ Existing � , Pond NOO 1•1, S nandoa ' morial Park ��► '�'- A north/south connector road, as shown on the proffered Generalized Development Plan (GDP), would extend from the proposed entrance on Papermill Road to the northern Property limits where it would connect with the planned transportation system for the adjoining Madison Village project. For reference, the GDP includes the transportation program approved as part of the Madison Village rezoning and master development plan. While not included as part of the County's long range transportation plans, this north/south connection between Freedom Manor and Madison Village would improve connectivity in the area and also help to minimize new access points along Route 522. The TIA identifies the impacts associated with and levels of service (LOS) that can be expected after development of the subject Property. The phased analysis assumes background traffic growth and development of adjoining projects as well to provide for an accurate depiction of the future functionality of the transportation network. At full build - out, the proposed rezoning is expected to generate 2,643 average daily trips. The TIA assumes two phases. Phase 1 includes development of 100 single family detached units on a single access point at Papermill. Phase 2 adds the development of 200 single family attached or apartment units and assumes a connection through the Madison Village project. Accordingly, the Phase 2 scenario includes vehicle trips through the Madison Village site that would utilize the north/south connector road for access to Papermill Road. The TIA identifies that the roundabout on Papermill Road will function at an overall LOS B or better under both the 2020 Phase 1 and 2026 Phase 2 scenarios. This improvement is proffered to be completed prior to issuance of occupancy permits for any dwelling units for the project thereby ensuring safe and efficient traffic movements for Papermill Road traffic and vehicles accessing the site. The TIA recommends lengthening the eastbound Papermill Road right turn pocket at Route 522 and also to revise the signalization at that intersection to provide for a right turn overlap phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase into the signal timing. This would allow for a continuous right turn movement as opposed to a right -on -red situation for vehicles turning from Papermill Road onto southbound Route 522. That suggested improvement would be required as a condition of background traffic, regardless of the development of Freedom Manor. The TIA identifies acceptable levels of service at full build -out for the intersections within Madison Village and at Route 522 and Justes Drive without the need for any additional improvements. The proposed proffer statement limits access to Papermill Road to a single entrance as shown on the GDP. The Applicant has proffered the following improvements prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 150`h dwelling unit: Extension of the north/south connector road from the roundabout on Papermill Road to the northern property limits (to connect with Madison Village) Construction of an interparcel connection to the western Property limits (as shown on the GDP). Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor In addition, the Applicant has proffered to provide for additional right of way across the Property frontage on Papermill Road to accommodate its share of the ultimate 80 foot right of way for Papermill Road, planned as a major collector. To provide for a multi - modal transportation system, the proposed proffer statement includes the extension of a 10' hiker/biker trail through the site. Resulting from the 2005 rezoning application process for a portion of the Property, an existing restrictive covenant would preclude the connection of Westwood Drive to the north/south connector road. Historic Sites and Structures The Virginia Division of Historic Landmarks identified the Evendale School (file #34-433) within the vicinity of the site. However, that structure has been converted to a private residence. Review of the application by the Historic Resources Advisory Board has been deemed unnecessary. Stormwater Management The site currently drains generally from west to east. Development of the Property will be subject to the revised Stormwater Management regulations addressing both stormwater quantity and quality. As opposed to a single large stormwater management facility, the final design of the stormwater management system will likely include the use of several bioremediation filters to provide quality and quantity controls that meet current requirements. Ownership and maintenance of any open space areas, including stormwater facilities, will be the responsibility of the HOA per the proposed proffer statement. Sewaae Convevance and Water Su Using a standard rate of 200 gallons per day/dwelling unit it is projected that the proposed development could produce up to 60,000 gallons per day of sewer flow. An existing 8" sewer line within Westwood Drive, adjacent to the site, would serve as the connection point for sanitary service for the Property directing flows ultimately to the Opequon Wastewater Treatment Plant. A pump station may be required to service the easternmost portions of the site. Alternatively, it may be possible to provide gravity service to the entirety of the Property by extending service to the existing sewer main within Route 522 via an existing "pipe stem" that extends from the Property to Route 522. The final design of the sanitary system would be identified as part of the site engineering process. Water supply will be provided by way of an existing 8" water main extending from Westwood Drive to the Property. Water usage of the project would be roughly equivalent to its sewer flows of up to 60,000 gallons per day. The water system will be designed to provide adequate pressure for potable water service and fire -fighting services. Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 4 0 Solid Waste The following table provides a projection of the potential solid waste generation as a part of this project. Unit Type Units Waste Generation Total Waste Ibs Single Family Detached 100 12 lbs/day 1,200 Single Family Attached 200 9 lbs/day 1,800 Total 3,000 The Regional Landfill will be utilized for solid waste disposal. Waste collection by private hauler will be the responsibility of the HOA for Freedom Manor in order to minimize impacts to citizen convenience sites. Impact on Community Facilities To mitigate any impacts to community facilities, the Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution consistent with the current Frederick County Impact model. The proffer statement provides the Applicant with the option to develop the Property utilizing the County's TDR Ordinance in lieu of monetary proffers. If the TDR option is not utilized, the proffer statement requires that the monetary contribution would be necessary for any single family attached or apartment units as well as the initial 75 single family detached units. The resulting 25 single family detached units which could be constructed without monetary proffers in Phase 1 of the proposed development is in recognition of the 6.81 acres of existing, un-proffered RP zoning located within the central portions of the Property (as shown on Exhibit C). The applicant has offered the following per unit monetary contributions, excluding the last 25 detached units in Phase 1, to mitigate the impacts of this development: Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $547 $406 $412 General Government $1,373 $1,050 $1,050 Libra $442 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,819 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction $15,499 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $19,680 $13,680 $13,880 Impact Analysis Statement — Freedom Manor 5 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FREEDOM MANOR FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Located in Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Dave Holliday Construction 420 W Jubal Early Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 667-2120 Prepared by: Pennoni Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects 13880 Dulles Corner Ln, Ste 100 Pennoni Herndon, Virginia 20171 T 703.449.6700 - F 703.449.6713 October 28, 2014 Revised August 12, 2015 ei~ DOUGLAS R. KENNEDY5 4? �d Ltc. No. 21450 O ; 9-1-15 f�'sr�1�lALir ' TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................12 A) CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE............................................................................................................ 12 B) STUDY OBJECTIVE.....................................................................................................................................13 ' 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION..........................................................................................................16 A) EXISTING ROADWAYS................................................................................................................................ 16 1 B) C) FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS..................................................................................................16 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES........................................................................................................................ 16 4. ANALYSIS OF 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................20 ' A) B) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES......................................................20 CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................22 4. ANALYSIS OF 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................25 A) B) TRAFFIC GROWTH.................................................................................................................................... APPROVED / UNBUILT BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS.................................................................................... 25 25 C) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................30 D) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................30 5. SITE TRIP GENERATION.....................................................................................................................35 6. 2020 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS (PHASE 1)......................................37 ' 7. ANALYSIS OF 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................40 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................40 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSES............................................................................................... 40 ' 8. ANALYSIS OF 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................46 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH....................................................................................................................................46 B) APPROVED / UNBUILT BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................46 C) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................46 D) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................46 9. ANALYSIS OF 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................54 ' A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................54 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSES...............................................................................................61 10. TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS......................................................................................................66 ' 11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................71 LIST OF FIGURES Figure1: Site Location ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Figure2: Site Parcels..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure2A: General Development Plan.......................................................................................................................................... 4 figure3: Study Area Roadways .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 311: Recommender! Improvements...................................................................................................................................... 11 Figure4: ATearby Uses................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 411: Eastern Frederick Counr , Long -Term Laud Use Plan............................................................................................. 15 Figure 5: 2030 Frederick Count, Conrprebensnre Transportation Plan (Road Classification)...................................................... 18 Figure 6: 2030 Frederick Count, Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Roar! Cross Section)...................................................... 19 Figure 7: 2014 Existing Traffic Volumes................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8: 2014 Existing Traffc Conditions................................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 9: 2020 Background Grovtb Traffc Volumes................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 10: 2020 Background Development Traffc Assignments.................................................................................................. 29 Figure 11: 2020 Background Traffc Vobrmes............................................................................................................................ 33 Figure 12: 2020 Background Traffic Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 13: 2020 Site (Phase 1) Traffc Distributions.................................................................................................................. 38 Figure 14: 2020 Site (Phase 1) Traffic A ssignments ................................................................................................................... 39 Figure15: 2020 Total Traffic Vobunes...................................................................................................................................... 44 Figure 16: 2020 Total Traffic Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 45 Figure 17: 2026 Background Grondb Traffic Volumes............................................................................................................... 49 Figure 18: 2026 Background Development Traffc Assignments.................................................................................................. 50 Figure 19: 2026 Background Traffic Volumes ............................................................................................................................ 51 Figure 20: 2026 Background Traffic Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 53 Figure 21: 2026 Background Development TraffcAssignnrents rv/ Interparcel Connection......................................................... 56 Figure 22: 2026 Background Traffc Vobams w/ Irnlerparcel Connection................................................................................... 57 Figure 23: 2026 Site (Build -Out) Traffic Distributions ............................................................................................................... 58 Figure 24: 2026 Site (Barild Orrt) Trq§ic Assignments................................................................................................................ 59 Figure25: 2026 Total Traffc Volumes...................................................................................................................................... 60 Figure26: 2026 Total Traffic Conditions .................................................................................................................................... 65 I I 11 ILIST OF TABLES ' TABLE 1: PROPOSED LAND USE DENSITIES...................................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 2: 2013 EXISTING LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) REsul:rs...................... .................................... I................ 23 TABLE 3: HISTORICAL TRAI'I'IC GRO\x/TI I.......................................................................................................................... 26 TABLE 4: OTHER DEVELOPMENTS — TRIP GENERATION............................................................................................... 28 TABLE 5: 2020 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (951Yo rn.E) REsui: rs.................................................................. 32 TABLE6: SITE TRIP GENERATION....................................................................................................................................... 36 TABLE 7: 2020 To'rAl, LOS, DELAY & BOQ (950/i rim) RESUI:I'S................................................................................. 43 TABLE 8: 2026 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS.................................................................. 52 TABLE9: SITE TRIP GENERATION....................................................................................................................................... 55 TABLE 9A: SITE IMPACT AT PAPERM11.1. ROAD.................................................................................................................. 62 TABLE 10: 2026 TOTAL. LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%ru.E) REsuixs.............................................................................. 64 TABLE 11: RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS Ar SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) ............... 67 TABLE 12: RIGI-IT-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 'ro'rAt. CONDrTIONS)............... 68 TABLL•' 13: LErr-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) .................. 69 TABLE 14: LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TO'rAi. CONDITIONS) .................. 70 IAPPENDICIES APPENDIX A: SCOPING DOCUMENTS APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNTS ' APPENDIX C: 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D: BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT DISTRIBUTIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS ' APPENDIX E: 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 WORKSHEETS APPENDIX F: 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 & SIDRA WORKSHEETS APPENDIX G: 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 WORKSHEET'S APPENDIX H: 2026 TOTAL. CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 & SIDRA WORKSHEETS Contact Information The analysis was prepared by Pennoni Associates Inc. ' 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 Pennoni Associates Inc.: Herndon, Virginia 20171 Mr. Ronald Mislowsky, P.E. (703) 449-6700 Mr. Patrick Sowers, P.E. Mr. Douglas R. Kennedy, P.E. Mr. Wan Chong, E.I.T. ' Mr. Graham P. Young, E.I.T. A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pennoni Associates Inc. has prepared this report to present the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed development of "Freedom Manor" in Frederick County, VA. As shown in Figure 1, the subject 47.5 acre site is located southeast of Winchester, VA, between I-81, Papermill Road (Route 644), and Route 522 (Front Royal Pike). The analysis was based on the requirements of Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). A scoping agreement is included in Appendix A. Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) submitted a traffic memo for the subject parcel on July 22, 2004 in support of a rezoning, and was approved for 70 single-family detached residential units in the site's southern 26.9 acres parcel and two site access locations, via Papermill Road and a secondary access to Route 522. The zoning was approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in September 2005 for an RP (Residential Performance Zoning). The proffers included a regional road contribution as well as language not to include a connection to Westwood Drive (VA Route 822). As shown in Figure 2, this project proposes an expansion of the rezoning area to utilize the site's northern parcels for an overall site density of 100 single-family detached residential units and a mix of 200 townhomes and apartments. Two site access points are proposed, one on Papermill Road and the other to Route 522 via an interparcel connection to the approved Madison Village development to the north. The general development plan also allows for a third interparcel access to accommodate VDOT guidance for one access for every 100 DU (dwelling units) with an access stub to the west. As discussed with VDOT, a scaled generalized development plan is shown in Figure 2A in lieu of a concept plan since the site is only in the rezoning phase. The project is planned to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the 100 single-family detached residential units with access to Papermill Road and Phase 2 would consist of 200 townhomes and apartments. Accordingly, two analysis years, 2020 for Phase 1 and 2026 for Phase 2 were analyzed in this report. The interparcel connection with Madison Village was assumed for 2026 only. At build -out (2026), the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,643 daily trips and 206 and 249 trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. The proposed development -generated average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed the 5,000 vehicle threshold for a "Chapter 527" submission. However, Pennoni prepared this report in accordance with "Chapter 527" guidelines contained in § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24 VAC 30-155), for submittal to Frederick County, VA, and VDOT Staunton District planning staff. Based on VDOT comments, the report is revised from the original analysis in October 2014 to include a roundabout at the Papermill Road site access. A separate roundabout justification is provided to supplement this report. DHOL1404 Page 1 Pennoni 690! .— 16 1 69 Ili 1 6 t9 l61 l"J lei 1371 V37 f659,1 ,6221 62a'' SITE 63111 St � Clty J �— •, �`6Sa 1 1401P %ddktown 1�627, 627) F,�1 0, 0 Di I • Sky Meadows SfAto, Park Va[a Juut(c: 1•iap, FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 1 FRAFFII I`IVV I I SITE LOCATION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA -- JL . dop �JL . ` Madison ` Village i Connection at Madison Village _- Proposed Entrance LEGEND aProject Site (47.5 Ac) Ex. Freedom Manor (26.9 Ac) Ex. RP Zone (7.1 Ac) Ex. RA Zoning (13.5 Ac) ■ ■ ■ 0 1 ■ ro N ■ 'Westwood Drive ■ 6.0 A O! v- o i 7 Shenandoah Memorial Park Existing Signal FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 2 • - . SITE PARCELS Figure 2A: General Development Plan Madison LongcYoit) d Village Road and Trail Connection to Madison Village Bentley Avenge Road and Trail o Connection to TM 83-A-145 N ` Aestt. oa d give -- - - r North/South Proposed Connector Road 10' Nail or Hike Lane Proposed Proposed Roundabout 10' nail -a ♦r A AProposed NA R/W Dedication 0 I co Shenandoah A o Memorial Park SUBJECT PROPERTY t, 1po Existing Signal eve Vine Lane - FREEDOM MANOR PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. o Generalized Development Plan 117 E. Picadilly St. Vinchester, Virginia 22601 Cb a VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUN7Y, NRC/N14 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 This traffic study analyzed the study area intersections for the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2014 existing conditions, 2020 conditions with and without the proposed development, and 2026 conditions with and without the proposed development. Design years are intended to allow for market absorption and general growth in the vicinity. Final build -out year will vary. As shown in Figure 3, the study intersections are: 1. Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Proposed: Roundabout) 2. Madison Village internal intersection (Proposed: Roundabout) 3. Madison Village Entrance & Route 522 (Proposed: Signalized) 4. Route 522 & Papermill Road (Existing: Signalized) 5. Route 522 & Justes Drive (Existing: Signalized) General growth of 1.5% per year was added to the existing volumes and other background developments in the vicinity of the site were entered into the assignments to assess future conditions as well. Freedom Manor site traffic distributions were referred from the original approved TIA submitted for the rezoning application. The study intersections were analyzed for Level -Of -Service (LOS), queue lengths, and delay for 2014 existing conditions, and 2020 and 2026 future conditions, with and without anticipated site traffic. Turn -lane warrants at the site entrance on Papermill Road were also reviewed and documented. Based on comparisons of 2005 and 2013 traffic counts from previous studies, VDOT requested new counts for the Route 522 & Papermill Road signal to better assess existing conditions. This analysis was included in the base year conditions. Based on the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed subject development and the evaluation of 2014 existing conditions, 2020 background conditions, 2020 total conditions, 2026 background conditions, and 2026 total conditions, it was found that the surrounding roadway network can adequately accommodate the proposed site densities. The conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows: a) Trip Generation The proposed development would be built in two phases. Phase 1 is planned for initial site access for the single-family residential community with access to Papermill Road and would generate 1,050 daily trips, 80 trips during the AM peak hour, and 91 trips during the PM peak hour. Build -out of the project with access to Madison Village is projected to generate a total of 2,643 daily trips, 206 trips during the AM peak hour, and 249 trips during the PM peak hour. ' Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Paintcr-Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 5 Pennoni 6441 IL � 164S r r 400 1 T O 1 � 1 � 1 11 %ppruxtmate Site 1 Boundary 1 5I2 r I � T I I i sill I � c u I--- — S I I I till! 40 LEGEND Shenandoah Memorial Parlt O STUDY INTERSECTIONS PROPOSED ROADWAY IMP 641 c y f 5�? A Wlnchesti, I AlrMr' Kohl's Distribution Cente 16 Alik /rf Elementary Scl Admiral ktt ,,ir c_I �Iyrd MOM ;ct• —'1„ _,� FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 3 STUDYAREA FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Intersections Papermill Road (Route 644) & Site Entrance This unsignalized intersection is proposed to be built as a roundabout with Phase 1 of the project for primary site access. Phase 2 of the project would introduce Madison Village trips as well with the proposed interparcel connection. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable overall LOS "B" under both Phase 1 and Phase 2 conditions, with approach LOS at "C" or better conditions. Without a roundabout, the westbound approach out of the site during the 2026 PM peak hour is projected to operate at LOS "E" primarily, due to the high through volumes on Papermill Road. There were no projected queueing issues. Signalization is not anticipated to be warranted at the site entrance. Without a roundabout, a southbound Papermill Road left -turn lane and a northbound Papermill Road right -turn taper would be warranted with 2020 total PM peak hour volumes. The left -turn lane would be warranted with both AM and PM peak hour volumes under 2026 peak hour volumes. In addition, the 2026 PM peak hour volume would meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, Pennoni has engaged several iterations of alternatives including reviewing minimum left turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication would be available. As noted in previous meetings with VDOT, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) would not support partial dedications or easements to allow the Papermill Road widening to be shared between the property owners at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit the turn lane improvements along the Freedom Manor- frontage. Even an option with a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported by the adjacent property owner's representatives. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed DHOL1404 Page 7 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 E design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes not proposed with this revision. Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Streets This proposed roundabout, to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "A" for all peak hours and analysis years. The roundabout was modeled as single -lane, with single -lane approaches and an inscribed diameter of 110 ft. Since this was an internal intersection off -site to Freedom Manor, the LOS is based on the HCM methodology as used in the Madison Village Traffic Study, but updated with revised traffic volumes with Freedom Manor. ' Madison Village Entrance Road & Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) ' This proposed signalized intersection, also to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "B" for all peak hours and analysis years with approach LOS "D" or better. There were no projected queueing issues with the turn lane storage lengths suggested in this TIA. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road ' This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "B" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the ' eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D". Under 2020 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound ' approach would deteriorate to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D". F F r Under 2026 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate further to LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "E". Under 2020 total conditions with the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach will operate at LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D" without improvements. Under 2026 total PM conditions, the overall intersection LOS would be an "E". Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 8 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' To alleviate the undesirable LOS without the site and address eastbound and northbound queueing during the future analysis years, the following ' improvements are recommended, regardless of the subject site rezoning: 1. Lengthen the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn pocket, currently about 35 ft, to 325 ft. Due to the short existing turn lane, ' the LOS was shown without a separate turn lane in the revised analysis. ' 2. Incorporate an eastbound right -turn overlap phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase into the ' signal timing. 3. Lengthen northbound Route 522 northbound left -turn pocket ' by restriping the center lane on Route 522, currently about 300 ft, to 425 ft. ' With these recommended improvements, the overall intersection LOS would improve to "C" or better and the right -turn storage would be ' sufficient for 95"' percentile queues for the critical 2026 PM peak hours. Approach LOS would also improve to LOS "D" or better. Site impacts are negligible at the signal, at 2.7 percent of the intersection's total hourly traffic volume in the 2020 PM peak hour and 4.5 percent in the 2026 PM ' peak hour, with the PM peak hour being considered because it was worse than the AM peak hour. So off -site right turn lane (construction) is not ' recommended with site development. The site is providing Papermill Road improvements at its entrance. I E u Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Justes Drive This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "A" in both peak hours, with all approach LOS at "B" or better. It will operate at overall LOS "B" under 2020 and 2026 background as well as total conditions. All the approaches will operate at LOS "D" or better. There were no observed queueing issues for any of the analysis years. c) Final Assessment: The proposed site densities can be adequately accommodated by the surrounding roadway network with a roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road as shown in Figure 3A. Off -site mitigations that could be considered by the County with or without the site are: Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 9 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 1. Lengthening of the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn lane at its intersection with Route 522 from the existing 35 ft to 325 ft. 2. At the same intersection, incorporating an eastbound right -turn overlap signal phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 10 0 I N�ai �Fo� Entrance � 1 \ I \ i Curt oo \\ !Madison Village III (Lon —Term) I T I futureceII4__i_L ;J �—� a11IIIi iiIIiIi r�l _— AI pp—rox—imate Site Boundary > O SITE I --I I I I j I j Site Entrance I L — --t 2 I 1 U ✓ c� t G O1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS Ve LANE GEOMETRY 5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT — — — FUTURE ROADWAY Road r— — — — — — — — — — — I I Design Concept I I single lane I 1 roundabout 140 It � I inscribed circle I off -set to northeast. I LEGEND 644) (g) IMPROVEMENTS: I BY FREEDOM MANOR — BY MADISON VILLAGE _ —I FOR CONSIDERATION, I --j BY OTHERS ;i. T � z/p 3/YIJAJ"/L JvL L J Madison Village Entrance A LL 0 G ty T � v JVL JVL L � Papermill Road . � ^ (Route644)� I Extend EBR ------� I storage I I I from 35 ft to i ---J 325 ft. _I I I New five section signal head and I rewiring to incorporate an overlap 1 _L___ phase for the eastbound right I P gh turn. 1 1 Adjust center I turn lane I ---------� storage: I Justes I +125 ft NB Dnve I 1 and -125 ft SB I OI � I I I I I I � J CL LJ LJ u c , �I >, .2 z 0 v tr FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 3A • TRAFFICIWACTSTUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 2. INTRODUCTION Pennoni Associates Inc. has prepared this report to present the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed development of "Freedom Manor" in Frederick County, VA. As shown in Figure 1, the subject 47.5 acre site is located southeast of Winchester, VA, between I-81, Papermill Road (Route 644), and Route 522 (Front Royal Pike). The analysis was based on the requirements of Frederick County and the Virginia ' Department of Transportation (VDOT). A scoping agreement is included in Appendix A. ' a) Current and Proposed Land Use Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) submitted a traffic memo for the subject parcel ' on July 22, 2004 in support of a rezoning, and was approved for 70 single-family detached residential units in the site's southern 26.9 acres parcel and two site access locations, one on Route 522 and the other on Papermill Drive. ' As shown in Figure 2, this project proposes an expansion to utilize the site's northern parcels for an overall site density of 100 single-family detached residential units and a mix of 200 townhomes and apartments. Two site access points are proposed, one on Papermill ' Road and the other on Route 522 via an interparcel connection with the approved Madison Village development to the north. A roadway connection between the Freedom Manor development and Westwood Drive is not proposed. Also, a roadway stub is proposed to be constructed for a possible future interparcel connection to the west of the site, as shown approximately on Figure 3. ' The project is planned to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the 100 single-family detached residential units and Phase 2 would consist of 200 townhomes and apartments. Accordingly, two analysis years, 2020 for- Phase 1 and 2026 for Phase 2 were ' analyzed in this report. The interparcel connection with Madison Village was assumed for 2026 only. The proposed site densities are summarized in Table 1 below. iTABLE 1: PROPOSED LAND USE DENSITIES DHOL1404 Page 12 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 As shown on Figure 2 and Figure 4, the site's north parcel is zoned RA (Rural Area District) and the remaining three parcels to the south are zoned RP (Residential, Performance District) on the Frederick County website's "Planning Access Terminal" map (accessed October 23, 2014). The comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is shown in Figure 4A with the area north of Papermill Road planned in the "Eastern Frederick County Long -Term Land Use Plan" as residential to the south and high density residential to the north. Adjacent to the site, the plan shows residential to the east and high density residential to the northwest. The Shenandoah Memorial Park and the properties south of Papermill Road are planned for park uses. At build -out (2026), the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,643 daily trips and 206 and 249 trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. b) Study Objective This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has the following objectives: - Forecast future trips generated by the proposed development, - Analyze and document the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding road network, and - Identify mitigation options, if needed. Pennoni coordinated with the developer, VDOT staff, and Frederick County staff in August and September of 2014 to define the scope of the traffic study as shown in Appendix A. The proposed development -generated average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed the 5,000 vehicle threshold for a "Chapter 527" submission. However, Pennoni prepared this report in accordance with "Chapter 527" guidelines contained in § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24 VAC 30-155), for submittal to Frederick County, VA, and VDOT Staunton District planning staff. DHOL1404 Page 13 Pennoni Approximate Site 'undan t` w r a•1� R �ROute �� log ,- hsces Drive i' FREEDOM MANOR rR %l r NEARBY LAND USES FREDERICK COUNTY VA M•`S a:f�l I ll.,w J i Approximate Site' Boundary A� \ \ 1, \`�t \Al X/ ♦ �,/ �♦ i MORAL W.W, • .U"F. Long Range Land Use Plan ^ Future RI l7 8ypxt V.Os� D.r.rla.t«+ An+ S.+.t +nd Water S-- Ana Arpr S.ypon Ate+ --%W an4M1 Support Are. Bv,.vss W.d Use OWed Us. Court -csa of— _ _ Npl�ay Cortrn.rcul 02 03 - tdtnt W Air Warerrxtte ® ItrJVy Yd—W..W QF—ttre W-9 l mp4 �t R., b-ft l • PU— d UM DerMop.rw.t IY.ed Use Apr R WICbd lrba Ce.1M . %-ghborMod V. W CR.,.drrthN J va QIp, 0..t," Fl —,d ; ..+ ONpn D.—AV R.,d t.A 17 16 ua r.eOLw R�pN C—*V Revd —W 17 16 u+ Ru.t Area OC—,M Recnabott � J R.u.atwn ��+ Naty al Resovv, 6 Reueanon Park E nrlrtM me.ttAlly Sen A.— Areas r.srntate RufFr, © H,t— DSA �_/ MnWeotut (� so-.. Fr. t Rexv ranr Car.r.vrty c« J, r rl 2030 Con-DFehenslve Poky Plan Mac F ADOroved: July 14th, 2011 a.7/ Amended: June 13th, 2012 FREEDOM MANOR EASTERN FREDERICK COUNTY FIGURE 4A • VRAFFW ISAPACI Sit,D) LONG TERM LAND USE PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ■ a) Existing Roadways Route 522 (Front Royal Pike): In the site vicinity, Route 522 diverges form US 50 ' (Millwood Pike) east of the I-81 intersection and connects the City of Winchester to the north with I-66 and the City of Front Royal to the south, traversing a distance of approximately 15 miles, mostly through rural areas. North of Papermill Road, Route 522 carries the VDOT classification of urban minor arterial. South of Papermill Road, VDOT classifies it as a rural minor arterial. It is a 4-lane roadway with a two-way left -turn lane ' (TWLTL) from US 50 to'/2 mile south of Papermill Road where it becomes 4-lane median - divided. VDOT estimates the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to be 14,000 vehicles north of Papermill Road and 16,000 vehicles south of Papermill Road. The speed limit is 55 mph in ' the vicinity of the study area. Papermill Road (Route 644): Papermill Road is an approximately 1.5 mile roadway that ' starts within the City of Winchester and continues in a southeasterly direction ending at Route 522. It is 2-lane undivided and considered an urban minor collector by VDOT. Papermill Road carried an ADT of 7,600 vehicles in 2014 according to VDOT estimates. The speed limit in the study area is 45 mph. b) Future Transportation Improvements The 2030 Eastern Frederick County Comprehensive Transportation Plans are shown in ' Figure 5 and Figure 6 in terms of road classification and cross section, respectively. The Plans show Papermill Road is envisioned to become 4-lane divided corridor. Papermill Road's intersection with Route 522 is also shown to be shifted to the south to align with ' Justes Drive, with Papermill Road continuing past Route 522 to US 50 (Millwood Pike) east of the future Route 37 Bypass. However, no programmed improvements were identified at the scoping session, and accordingly, no future regional transportation improvements were assumed in the analysis. ' c) Construction Estimates For planning budget purposes using the VDOT 2009 Planning and Mobility estimates (inflated at 3 percent annually to 2018), the proposed and suggested improvements could be budgeted as noted: ' - Roundabout construction at site entrance, estimated at $1,300,000 plus $200,000 for realigning approximately 180 ft of the southbound Papermill Road approach to the roundabout. ' - $1,014,500 for the main on -site roadway as a two-lane local street from Papermill Road to the interparcel connection to Madison Village. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 16 r A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Additional off -site improvements suggested to improve existing, background, and total operations: - Extend eastbound Papermill Road right turn lane from 35 ft to 325 ft with 100 ft taper, including utility and R-O-W contingencies at 25% percent of the lane cost. This would equate to $925,000. - Modification of the existing traffic signal operations at Route 522 & Papermill Road to add an eastbound right turn overlap phase, estimated at $5,000 for a 5-section signal head on eastbound approach, related rewiring, and assuming no structural upgrades of the northeast quadrant traffic signal pole. - Restriping of the northbound left turn lane between Papermill Road and Justes Drive to increase left turn storage, estimated at $7,000. These estimates are preliminary and are for general comparisons only, are based on projected 2018 VDOT cost estimates for planning, and not based on final engineering plans for Frederick County or VDOT approval. d) Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities There are no existing pedestrian features along the arterial and collectors. However, with the subdivision improvements in the urban area, sidewalks are proposed. There is currently no bus/transit service outside of Winchester City limits (Win Tran). Papermill Road is designated for a potential future bicycle facility per the Winchester, Frederick County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. A 10' multi -use trail is proffered across the property's Papermill Road frontage, as part of the site improvements. DHOL1404 Page 17 Pennoni Eastern Road Plan - )an 2011 Vew Major 4rtn�a� ^� '-proved Malw Arterei Yew Mmor Artenal ',-proved Minor Arterial .4" Major Collectw Improved Major Collector Vew M—Collector 'mp—ed MmOr Collector Ramp . Wads 4 Fu,— Rt )? BYoeu �re•n eewroo.�.nt n ^Sewer end Nater Sery •e Arrd `/ AurdlC nmmunit Yt-toter FREEDOM MANOR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE FIGURE 5 TRANSPORTATION PLAN IY10,14W (ROAD CLASSIFICATION) „s Eastern Frederick 1 County • B.. PlanCross Sections j � 1 �sFFE lo.� of Eastern Road Plan Cross Sections i - t. Futurr At J7 5v0•t1 urban Development •re• Sewer nd water Serv,c< A,,-,, awelcommunrtrCen[e• J FREEDOM MANOR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE FIGURE 6 IR M H milt u I ;n D) TRANSPORTATION PLAN ;J,,,J,,,,,, FREDERICK COUNTY, VA (ROAD CROSS SECTIONS) luk-1,0/5 IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' 4. ANALYSIS OF 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Pennoni conducted weekday peak period manual turning movement traffic counts on Wednesday, October 1, 2014 from 6 AM to 9 AM and 4 PM to 7 PM at the Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road (Route 644) intersection. Based on the turning ' movements, the weekday AM peak hour was identified to start at 7:15 AM and the PM peak hour peak hour was identified to start at 4:30 PM. The traffic counts are included in Appendix B of this report from Quality Counts, and the AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown graphically on Figure 7. The Route 522 & Justes Drive intersection turning movement volumes were derived from a comparison of the 2014 counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road (by Pennoni) and 2005 ' counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road and Route 522 & Justes Drive (by VETTRA for the Frederick County Elementary School TIA, June 9, 2005). Based on the observation that the counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road are constant (they actually show a slight decrease) between 2005 and 2014, it was assumed that if the inbound and outbound volumes on Justes Drive to/from Route 522 were counted today, they would be similar to ' the 2005 VETTRA counts at that intersection (plus non -school -peak elementary school trips to/frorn Evandale Elementary, built after 2005). The VETTRA counts are also included in Appendix B of this report. The 2013 VETTRA warrant study for Justes Drive ' only provided AM and PM school peaks. 2014 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) roadway link volumes were calculated based on PM peak hour volumes and a "k" factor of 0.84 and 0.93 for- Route 522, north and south of Papermill Road, respectively, and 0.096 for Papermill Road. The "k" factors were taken frorn VDOT's 2013 Average Daily Traffic Volume Estimates data and peak hour volumes. Consequently, the ADT on Route 522 was estimated at 16,430 vehicles daily north of ' Papermill Road and 18,680 vehicles daily south of Papermill Road. The ADT on Papermill Road was estimated to be 8,810 vehicles daily. ' DHOL1404 Page 20 Pennoni pa 8,810 O LEGEND N 01 STUDY INTERSECTIONS Itf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,01111 WEEKDAY ADT 1 R N Approximate Site Boundary 0 x srrl_ I 16,430 i �-- — — — -, SITE I Papermill Road (Route 644) 4 8s10 18,680 17,770 O y Y ? C � Papermill Road Y _ (Route 644) 62(121)MP 130 (372) Justes Drive O � T 118 (70) 50 (41) Justes DriN e t Y o — FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 7 HUFFICIMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES DROL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY. VA 4agast 2015 A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Peak hour factors and heavy vehicle percentages were calculated based on the traffic counts at the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for 2014 existing conditions. Signal timing data, based on field observations, were also entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for Route 522's intersections with Papermill Road and with Justes Drive. Table 2 and Figure 8 show the 2014 existing lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "D" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during both peak hours. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D" while the Route 522 northbound and southbound approaches operate at LOS "B" and "C", respectively. HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). But it isn't a fully single lane approach either because some right turn vehicles are able to utilize the right turn storage lane, however short, to make right turns on red. Because this is an "in-between" situation, HCM analysis skews the results to be better than actual if analyzed as 2 lanes and worse than actual if analyzed as a single lane approach. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background, and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. For the PM peak, the LOS "D" equates to a 400 ft queue on the approach. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "A" during the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "B" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2014 existing conditions are included in Appendix C of this report. DHOL1404 Page 22 Pennoni ' Revised August 12, 201S A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor TABLE 2: 2013 EXISTING LOS) DELAY & BOQ 950 oTILE RESULTS ' Existing/ AM Peak flour PM Peak hour Lane Group/ Proposed Back of � Back of 11 Intersection Traffic Control t Approach turn -lane : a LOS � Delay Queue LOS a Delay Queue lengths (In sec) (in feet) (in sec) (in feet) (fc c t) L'B1LR C 24.6 130 D 44.0 400 EB LOS - C 24.6 - D 44.0 - ' NB!L 300 A 8.0 51 C 28.9 161 Route 522 N B/r A 6.5 GS B 14.7 134 Signalized NBrr 4 NB LOS A 7.0 I3 18.9 - t PapertrnllRoad S Br B 19.7 115 C 32.8 250 SB/rR - SB I,OS B 19.7 - C 32.8 - ' Overall B 13.9 - C 30.9 - WBiL 225 B 18.0 46 B 18.5 36 WBIR - B 14.7 32 B 15.3 25 NVB LOS B 15.7 - B 16.4 - ' NBrr = A 9.5 105 A 7.9 125 N Brr Route 522 Signalized NBiR 325 A 4.9 25 A 4.3 25 5 & NB LOS - A 9.0 - A 7.7 - ' Justes Drive SB/L 500 A 6.3 26 A 4.7 25 Sf3rr A 3.3 35 A 3.6 94 ' S BTF SB LOS A 4.1 A 3.7 Overall - A 7.7 A 6.0 (1) GB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, S13 = Southbound, L: Len, T: fhru, R: Right (2) Turn -Lane lengdas do not include taper. All values are approximate. ' (3) LOS and Delay values calculated wide IICM methodology using Synchro 8. (4) 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated using Synchro 8 proprietary methodology. Mininuun assunled to be 25 feet. ' Page 23 DHOL1404 Penno»i N N Approximate Site Boundary 0 a Y I I c SITE ° I ,I I SITE \ I Road 1 E c= LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC SIGNAL A AM PEAK LOS PEAK LOS) 01�1 (A) (PM 0 B (C) x cN U aU o � Papermill Road Lc (Route 644) A C (D)* U U m d d A(B) OVERALL LOS = B (C) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). lustes Drive d d d d d d �B(B) n B (B) a L�= Justes Dric Y_ 6. ry T J Ce d d d o 6 OVERALL LOS = A (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 8 • TRAFFIC IMPACrSTUDI TRAFFIC CONDITIONS U11OL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA -'Off A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 4. ANALYSIS OF 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Background traffic volumes represent future traffic that would travel through the study area intersections without the proposed Freedom Manor development. The background traffic volumes were projected as outlined below. a) Traffic Growth Table 3 shows the historical traffic growth trends along Route 522 and along Papermill Road in the immediate vicinity of the site using VDOT ADT data. The average yearly growth rates were determined using to be under I percent between 2002 and 2012. When 2001 data is introduced, the average yearly growth rate increases due to a sudden increase between 2001 and 2002, which skews the results. Based on these observations, a conservative annual growth rate of 1.5 percent was agreed to in the scoping. The volumes grown at 1.5 percent annually are shown in Figure 9. b) Approved / Unbuilt Background Developments To project the 2020 background traffic conditions, the following background developments and their respective TIA's were considered in the analysis: - Madison Village (TIA by Stowe Engineering, Rev. June 27, 2013) - Frederick County Fourth High School (TIA by VETTRA, December 16, 2013) The land use densities and distributions for each development were taken from the TIA's, as well as pass -by and internal trip percentages for the commercial portion of the Madison Village development. The Madison Village trips for residential include the blended VDOT Staunton District townhouse/apartment derived trip rate for non -single- family detached uses. Pass -by and internal trips were included per the previous study. Trip generation for the high school was updated with the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9"' Edition) and for the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. The high school TIA did not indicate the distribution split at the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection, so 15 percent of the 50 percent assigned northbound on Route 522 at Justes Drive were assumed to use Papermill Road. The background developments' trip generations are detailed in Table 4. Figure 10 shows the 2020 background development traffic assignments for the AM and PM peak hours. Individual background development distributions and assignments, as well as Madison Village Commercial's pass -by assignments are shown in Appendix D of this report (Figures D1-D5). No Madison Village trips were routed through the Freedom Manor site for the short-term scenario, to be conservative, assuming no interparcel connection with initial development. DHOL1404 Page 25 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 3: HISTORICAL TRAFFIC GROWTH VDOT Traffic Growth Trend Front Royal Pike (Route 522) YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 15,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1 % 0.7 % 2011 15,000 -6.3% -1.6% -1.1% 2.3% 2010 16,000 0.0% 0.0% 1.1 % 2009 16,000 6.7% 0.0% 1.1% 2008 15,000 -6.3% 0.0% 1.2% 2007 16,000 0.0% 1.6% 4.9% 2006 16,000 0.0% 3.4% 2005 16.000 6.7% 7.5% 2004 15,000 0.0% 2003 15,000 7.1 % 2002 14,000 16.7% 2001 12,000 Average Growth Rateel 2.2% 1 1.4% 1.0% 1 1.5% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.5% 0.27. U. 17. Front Royal Pike (Route 522) hnfwoon P-t. 5n R P.--ill Rnari YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rato (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 14.000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.0% 2011 14.000 0.0% -3.3% -1.1% 3.8% 2010 14,000 0.0% -1.7% -1.1% 2009 14.000 0.0% -1.7% 0.0% 2008 14,000 -12.5 % -1.7% 0.0% 2007 16.000 6.7% 3.4 % 8.9 % 2006 15.000 0.0% 1.7% 2005 15.000 0.0% 11.8% 2004 15.000 7.1 % 2003 14,000 0.0% 2002 14.000 45.8% 2001 9,600 Average Growth Rate 4.3% 1.1% 1 0.9% 1 1.9% w/o 2001 0.1% -0.53, -U.77. U.01 Papermill Road (Route 644) between Route 522 & SCL Winchester YEAR AADT Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Rate (4 YR) Effective Growth Rate (6 YR) Effective Growth Rate (10 YR) 2012 7,800 0.0% -1.5% -2.5% 0.5% 2011 7.800 -6.0 % -5.1 % -2.5 % 2.2 % 2010 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 0.6% 2009 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 1.3% 2008 8,300 -13.5% 0.9% 1.9% 2007 9.600 5.5% 5.7% 7.3% 2006 9,100 0.0% 5.3% 2005 9.100 13.8% 9.6% 2004 8.000 3.9% 2003 7.700 4.1% 2002 7.400 17.5 % 2001 1 6.300 Average Growth Rate 2.3% 1 1.3% 1 1.0% 1 1.3% w/o 2001 0.8% 0.1% -0.37. U.s"/. SOURCE: VDOT, Traffic Engineedng Division, VDOT Average Daily Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates, Jurisdiction Report 34. DHOL1404 Page 26 Pennoni 0 O_ N Il U 'v ^ t _ 17,970 Approximate Site Boundary - N \0�, SITE 17,970L — ------SIT[. I LEGEND GD O STUDY INTERSECTIONS w,t TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1.000 WEEKDAY ADT Papemlill [toad (Route 6-k11 9,630 20,430 19,430 C- N ... T v O Papermill Road _ I ( Route 644 ) Al 1 t 68 032).0 142(407)� v N f. O 129 (77) 1 � 55 (45) Justes Drive t Y cC r� Ki V FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND GROWTH FIGURE 9 • rRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES D1100404 FREDERICK COUNTY. VA bgusr:Dls A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 4: OTHER DEVELOPMENTS — TRIP GENERATION Frederick County Fourth High School'' !TE Leaet Ur (1) AM PEAL HOUR I P41' PEAL HOUR DAJLY ctmw ctw DEN-M Yet: L.S6 /tY off LY (PIT ZRIAL Proposed Densities (LTE 841% Edidon Rates) PHASE: BUILD-0UT 530 5w 1(11 1250 :md H gh bchno1 366 172 538 86 161 2,071 TRIP RATE SOURCE Tnp COnw*)on Manual (9th Edition). Inatdute of Trensportabm Erlpnesrs, 2010 (1) rTE Land Code shorn as the Arse 3 dgts Deamat shown for rtarttN use by Pe wx" for lookup table 6x tnp rate 10nable (2) LaM use ar)c censtty as shorty+,n the TIA for the Frederick Canty Fourth Hgh School, by VETTRA, December 18, 2013) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour DIU F-(/ecttve Tnp Rate+ Q,trax x lrlsut/ (I,%raT Weekday Htgh School stud 04 Nr/. 0.1 4"i. 1 - Madison Village rrE [mow/ Ur (1) AM PEAL HOUR P.M PEAL HOUR Pell C CAUL CODE DE,I= Yac L5S (�' (w IY2TeL LY R4T 7317AL Proposed Densities (In Sth Edidon Rates) PHASE: BUILD -OUT 220 Z20810 480 Du Apamttmt 49 1% 245 1'A IN 299 3,192 Z31 231 400 128 Du Townhouse (%T)(3T Staunton Detimt Rate) 19 tit 81 he, 19 104 1,043 230 J0900 32 Du Townhouse 2 12 14 11 17 186 Total Residential Trips 70 270 340 I 271 148 419 4,421 926 F26000 107.000 w Sp—ky Retad Total Deselopmcnt '( rips 421 651 1,072 572 384 956 9,163 Internal Capture 39% 61% -5% 60% 40% -10% -15% Re:dental -7 -10 -17 -25 -17 -42 -711 Reuel -10 -7 -17 -17 -25 -42 0 Total Residential 63 260 323 246 131 377 3,710 Total Retail wl 374 715 2m 211 495 4,742 Total External Trips 404 634 1,038 a 530 342 972 8,452 926 2J". Pau -Inv Tnp. -ss 95 -183 -134 -I,19h Total Weekday Trips w/ Reduction 316 539 SSS 455 283 738 7,266 TRIP RATE SOURCE Tnp Oarorabm (9th Edtim). Institute of Transpmatim Engneen. 2010 (1) ITE Land Code shown as the Ant 3 dgts Decimal shown for rtemal use by Pemon for lookup table ror Inp rate enable (2) Land use ana aensity as shown ,n the TIA for Madam WISW. by Stowe Ergineenng. Rev Jura 27, 2013) AM Peek Hour PM Polk Hone Dilly F-fjecttve Tnp Rates flt a vl x I a,sar (2 t wl 3J0tutd WeallI Apamnent DU 05 NY.. 06 65i. 6.- Towthowe tXT)0T Stanton Dk~ Rate) DU 0.6 21', 0.8 63% d.l Townhouse DU 0.4 14`. 0.5 65% 5.8 Specialty Read ksf 611 48% 5.0 56% 441 DHOL1404 Page 28 Pennom o r x %170(142) _ 63 (246) Ar170(142) 4,430 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5()M1,01 260 (131) EMOO, 5 (8) 0% _• M r x 1,780 ro, ,770 * Madison Village Approximate Site Boundary N 1 I �I / L — \� SITE Pa (Route ll(,44) Roa 1,780 d 2,860 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS ■�� TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) l,ll(11) WEEKDAYADT N E 1 5. X f`J 'n — T y J N x ladison Village I = Entrance 349(189)� t 286 (I55) '0 n C ao ,v negative volume due to pass -by trips (see Appendix Figure 1)3) 1 C Papermill Road _ 1 Route 644) t 63(91). 55 (1Z) .7 Justes Dri, High School 2,080 O a � M % 86 (43) x6 (43) FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 10 2020 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS tur01.1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA .4ugust?015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 c) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The 2020 background traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours, shown in Figure 11, were determined by adding the 2020 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 10, to the 2020 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 9. d) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optirnized using Synchro 8. Table 5 and Figure 12 show the anticipated 2020 background lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout': single lane with 110 ft inscribed diarneter) This roundabout operates at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro was used in lieu of SIDRA as the TIS (Traffic Impact Study) for the development that the roundabout is located in (Madison Village TIS by Painter Lewis PLC, June 27, 2013) analyzed it with Synchro as well. In addition, the volumes are minimal and there are no operational issues identified with the LOS conditions, as all analysis years (both background and total) show overall LOS "A" and approach LOS "B" or better for both peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and will experience overall LOS "D" during the PM peak hour, without the site and with the existing lane configuration. Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Paintcr-Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 30 11 IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the ' PM peak hour, the eastbound Papennill Road approach would deteriorate to LOS "E", while the Route 522 northbound and southbound approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. ' HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft ' taper). But it isn't a fully single lane approach either because some right turn vehicles are able to utilize the right turn storage lane, however short, to make right turns on red. Because this is an "in-between" situation, HCM analysis skews the results to be better than actual if analyzed as 2 lanes and worse than actual if analyzed as a single lane. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the ' approach LOS. As a single lane approach and optimized with a 110 second cycle length, the ' eastbound Paperinill Drive queue increases with growth to approximately 750 ft during the PM peak hour. AM queues without the site are at approximately 300 ft, ' Pennoni assumed right turns on red at approximately I vehicle per cycle. Extending a separate right turn lane on Papermill Road to 325 ft and incorporating ' right turn overlap phasing for the eastbound right would improve approach LOS to a "C" in the AM and PM peak hours. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 1 eastbound lanes. This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure I I or Table 5 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix E, labeled as "2 Lane EB". ' The 95'11 percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length and the PM LOS is at "E". As mitigation for the 2020 background and the long-term 2026 background scenarios, lengthening the storage to 350 ft ' from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to- back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 50 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. 1 tIntersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS ' "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2020 background conditions are included in Appendix E of ' this report. DHOL1404 Page 31 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 5: 2020 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS 9 Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ t Approach' Existing/ Proposed turn -lane Iengths2 (feet) AM Peak flour PM Peak Hour LOS'i � Dclny (in see) Back of +S Queue (in feet) LOS 3 3 Delay (in sec) Back of Queue .ts (In feet) 2 Madison Village1VBR_TR Entrance Mad. Vile Commercial Street Rowtdabout EBU'R A 9.9 50 A 6.2 25 Ell LOS - A 9.9 - A 6.2 - A 7.4 50 A 9.7 75 NN13 LOS A 7.4 - A 9.7 - NBrLTR A 9.3 25 A 5.8 25 NB LOS - A 9.3 - A 5.8 - SBri-I-R A 6.8 25 A TO 25 SB LOS A 6.8 - A 7.0 - Overnll A 8.3 - A 8.3 - 3 Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance Signalized EBIL C 32.5 221 D 53.0 205 EBfR 250 C 29.0 48 D 50.9 55 Ell LOS - C 30.9 - D 52.0 - NBiL 225 A 8.9 43 A 6.2 104 NBri A 0.4 91 A 0.2 65 NB,T NB LOS A 2.3 A 1.7 - S B rf B 14.6 190 A 9.2 239 SBrf SBIR 275 B 14.0 45 A 9.0 43 SB LOS - 13 14.4 - A 9.1 - Overall - B 14.7 - B 12.4 - 4 Route 522 S Papermill Road Signalized Ell 'LR - D 49.9 298 E 71.9 753 Ell LOS - D 49.9 - E 71.9 - NBIL 350' C 23.7 130 E 68.3 305 NBrf A 6.3 20 B 14.7 115 NBrf NB LOS I3 10.9 - C 28.8 - SB f B 19.1 283 D 46.1 486 SBrI-R SB LOS 13 19.1 - D 46.1 - Overall - C 20.3 - D 46.1 - 5 Route 522 d Jtstes Drive Signalized WBIL 225 C 29.0 115 D 49.9 115 WBrR - C 22.2 77 D 46.2 51 NN'B LOS C 24.9 - D 47.8 - NBrf B 12.1 199 A 6.3 192 NBrf - NI3tR 325 A 5.5 25 A 2.0 25 NB LOS - 13 10.4 - A 6.0 - SIIfL 450 ° B I I .I SG A 3.8 25 SB/r - B 12.7 45 A 0.1 71 S13rf SB LOS B 12.1 - A 0.5 Overall B 13.4 - A 7.0 (1) Ell = Eastbowtd, WB =Westbound, NI3 = Nortnoound, ats = MU111DOn110, L: t.crt, t : t nru, n: Kigm (2)'1'utn-Lane lengths do not include taper. All values are approximate. (3) LOS and Delay values calculated with I ICM methodology using S)atchro 8. (4) Signalized intersection 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated using Synchro 8 proprietary methodology. Minimum assumed to be 25 feet. (5) Roundabout 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated whit IICM methodology using Synchro 8. (G) Remping recommended. DHOL1404 Page 32 O %170 (142) 10M163 (246) �1 70042)Entrance 4 430 Nladisun Villagc 8,460 5(8)wO 260 (131) I•110- _ Mx ur, r M, 11.410 re 11,410 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS itf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,0(►0 WEEKDAYADT N 21,740 Approximate Site Boundary x ^J y TE I 21,970 I 22,290 rl 1 IO T N T - Madison Village /� l Entrance 349(189)M0 286 (155) 0% x , O y z Papermill Road (Route 644) 1t 131 (223)00 197 (4181 M N x . HES 5, 0 N N % 215(120) 141(88) Drive tJustes x — t ^ N N t� FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND FIGURE 11 TRA\ F I C IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES FREDERICK COUNTY, VA .i +i<� Entrance Madison Village n OVERALL LOS = A (A) N Approximate Site Boundary 0 a I T i SITE J 1 r"- I �I / > Sill \ I ------ ------ papemtill 644) (toad (Rp° LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N - i Madison Village 0 - Entrance C (D) a C (D) OVERALL LOS =B(B) B fD) � J Papermill Road � [Route 644} D (E)* B (C) OVEfZALL LOS = C (D) Analyzed as one lane approach because of shun nght turn storage 05' 65'taper), Ju_tes Drive O 7A) < �C(D) C (D) , �� Justes Drip c OVERALL LOS —B(A) FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND FIGURE 12 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUD) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS onvu4e.1 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 1nlncc! 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 5. SITE TRIP GENERATION The proposed Freedom Manor site -generated trips were calculated using traffic generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 91h Edition, 2012, as well as VDOT Staunton District requirements that require 80% of the trips for townhomes and apartments to be calculated using VDOT local rates. The project is planned to be built in two phases, with Phase 1 (2020) consisting of 100 single-family residential dwelling units and Phase 2 (2026) consisting of a mix of 200 townhomes and apartment residential dwelling units. Table 6 shows the weekday AM and PM peals hour and daily trips generated by the proposed project for the two phases, with the values used in the analysis boxed. The values outside the boxes are shown for comparison. DHOL1404 Page 35 penno"it A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 6: SITE TRIP GENERATION Alf Ill. IlOUlt AM PFAK HOUR 1); IILY ITR r od far (I) COOT CQll<i I1L.YSIT ' !.'aL LYE 41 QL2 Mrz)L ID' QDT TOTAL (2- rarf Trip Generation By Right 210 210190 70 DU Single -Fans Det. WDOT) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables ell,+sr: 1 (zozo) 210 210I70 100 DU c SF Res. a, 100 DU (using EQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 1, 550 210 2;0:00 100 DU Single-Fam De[ (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD -our (2026) 230 230[M 200 DO Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 1s 73 88 70 34 104 1.172 230 210:Sn 40 DO a TH Res @40 DO (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 211:011 160 DU '(3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 83 47 130 1,303 I Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 I AM Peak Hour PM Peale Hour Daily Fffectire Ti7p Rates (2.3) 0--y gy) X3nbvnnd f2-way) �jlebouna Weelsdnv 210 Smglc-Fam De, (\T)OT) DU 0.76 25% 100 63i 1000 '-10 SI'Res ! 100DU DU 090 255: 091 63% 10.50 A%1i 210 single-Fam lkt. DU 0.75 25/ 1.00 63% 9.52 A\T 230 Townhouse DU 6 IT. 052 679: 586 230 111Res 'a 40UII UU 063 1MI. 010 68% 725 i Townhousc (W)01 Staunton Damn Raft) UU 063 23% 081 LtS; R 14 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9lh Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012 A%erage top rules used, unless noted will W. then equations used at size shown, wilt data sot OK for R2 > .0 75 AND SO > 110 % of a%o (1) ITE Lard Code Sher- as Iho Aunt 3 degas Decimal shorm for internal use by Pennon) for lookup fable for trip rate %unable. (2) Egecti%o initiates calculated by land use For avenge — = (Density) x (ave top non) = 2—y Tops x inbound pmenage) for Tops In I For RE equaaons,'c noted = (Density) x (top cqu2uo,) = 2—y Trips x (inbound pemenage) for Tops In (3) Assumed 80`k of to —houses at Staunton District e^ectivo Rates for townhouse, condo, or apartment. DHOL1404 Page 36 Penn ni A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 11 6. 2020 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS (PHASE 1) The 2020 site traffic distribution and assignment percentages shown in Figure 13 are derived from the June 2005 TIA for the rezoning application and are as follows: 45% via Route 522 to the north, 35% via Route 522 to the south, and 20% via Paper -mill Road to the northwest. The 2020 phase 1 site assignments are shown in Figure 14 for the AM and PM peak hours. All site trips are projected to use the Papennill Road entrance in 2020, as the interparcel connection with Madison Village to the north is not assumed to be open/constructed for initial access. DHOL1404 Page 37 0 ilk Lmu.uae Madison Village 20% (20%) Site Entrance Y — X L LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS wit e TURNING MOVEMENTS 10%(10%) Inbound %(Outbound %) 45% Approximate Site Boundary i SITE r--J I I I1 \ SITE N Road 35% o Y — rl z v, �r T =z Madison Village Entrance O n� Y L rl rl `J Papennill Road _ (Route 644) (35% I Justes Dn" O Justes Drive J FREEDOM MANOR 2020 SITE (PHASE 1) FIGURE 13 TR.AFFICINIPACTSTUD) TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS D110LI40' FREDERICK COUNTY, VA ru�,.,v 011 0 Madison Village F= 210 0 T 12 (7) ar3 tz71 Site Entrance N IM:WR 48() \ Approximate Site Boundary s i" G II � i SITP J t`- � �I �I i �— — st Fr. I 480 I �ti2o 1,050 l,apem�i11644 Road (Route 84� LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS Itf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PMJ 1,000 WEEKDAY ADT N 1 370 n 370 �r. N 'o Y L t"I - N � T J Madison k iIlage Entrance 7 Papermill Road 1 Route 644) 1t 27(15)00 21 021 _ r ? Juste= C O 1 3uste. Dri e 1 Y L ri T CJ r _ V r FREEDOM MANOR 2020 SITE (PHASE 1) FIGURE 14 • TRAFFIC IMP.ACTSTUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS DI1OL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA trleuu '01 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 7. ANALYSIS OF 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The proposed site -generated trips in 2020, shown on Figure 14 were added to the 2020 background traffic volumes, shown on Figure 12, to obtain 2020 total traffic volumes. Figure 15 shows the 2020 total traffic volumes at the study intersections for weekday AM and PM peak hours. b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analyses Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 7 and Figure 16 show the anticipated 2020 total lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peals hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8 and SIDRA for the proposed roundabout at the site entrance on Papennill Road, the following results were observed: Intersection #1: Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Unsignalized: with separate outbound right -turn lane from Site Entrance for capacity purposes; proposed single -lane roundabout in recommendations) Without a roundabout, this intersection operates at overall LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. The northbound Papennill Road approach does not meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane but does meet the threshold for a taper based on PM peak hour volumes. The southbound Papermill Road approach meets the warrant for a left - turn lane based on PM peak hour volumes. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, Pennoni updated the access plan to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in this revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates DHOL1404 Page 40 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable approach LOS "A" for the AM peak hour and at an LOS "B" for the PM peak hour. Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout': single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) The volumes at this roundabout do not change from 2020 background, and therefore, continues to operate at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes') This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) The intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at overall LOS "D" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peals hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papennill Road approach operates at LOS "F" while the Route 522 northbound and southbound approaches operate at LOS "D". As noted previously, the HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. For the total conditions, the PM queue with site traffic is increased by approximately 50 ft to 800 ft. AM queues increase to approximately 335 ft; but maintain the approach LOS "D" grade. The PM LOS is at "F" conditions with a ' Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter-Lcwis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Pennani Page 41 II A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 single lane. Overall LOS is at "D" conditions, which reflects the LOS letter grade for the 2020 background conditions. Extending a separate right turn lane on Papermill Road to 325 ft and incorporating right turn overlap phasing for the eastbound right would improve approach LOS to a "C" in the AM peak hour and "D" in the PM peak. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure 16 or Table 7 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix F, labeled as "2 Lane EB". The 95`' percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length. To support the 2020 total and the long-term 2026 total scenarios, lengthening the northbound storage to 425 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to-back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 125 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Although the lengths are different, lengthening the northbound left -turn lanes within the existing pavement is recommended with or without the site. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour- and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better. The Synchro 8 and SIDRA worksheets for 2020 Total conditions are included in Appendix F of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' ' ' ' i ' ' ' ' TABLE 7: 2020 TOTAL LOS) DELAY & BOQ 95%TILE RESULTS k Intersection "traffic Control hoe Grnupt Approacli� Rt Lstingl 1'rtmposeJ turn -lane : lengllts (feel) Ail! Peak hour I'dI Peak flour LOSs r Dcln)'c) (in se Back' Back of Qucuc is (In feet) LOSr s Delay (In sec) Rack of Qucucss (in feet) 1 Papemu➢Road & Ste r=ascc l;ns�ulvcJ WR4. - C 18.1 25 D 267 25 WRR 100 13 115 25 13 114 0 W1S LOS - C 17.0 - C 23.6 - NBTR A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 tin Los ,k 6.0 n 0.0 SI39:r - A 84 0 A 9.5 0 A 0.0 A 0.0 Sit LOS - A 0.1 - A 0.1 - Orenu A 1.2 A 0.7 I Papcmim Road & Ste Fnrancc IMPROVED u9)ia Rourdaboii WB1.R - A 66 25 A 61 25 R13 LOS - A 6.6 - A 6.1 - NWITt - A 8.6 70 A 9.2 80 N❑ LOS A 8.6 A 9.2 SBIIJ A 7.4 43 13 13.4 145 SI3I.0S - A 7.4 - 13 13.4 - Os•cn11 - A 8.0 - 11 11.4 - 2 Madison \'dbec Fi7rancc & \iad \'a Conimcrei,ISvcct Rotmdabota I331:lit - A 9.9 5o A 6.2 25 EJI LOS A 9.9 A 6.2 W131:IR A 74 5o A 9 7 75 Ml LOS - A 7.4 - A 9.7 - NIll:IR - A 9.3 25 A 5.8 25 MILOS A 9-3 A 5.8 SIS'rllt A 6.8 25 A 70 25 SR LOS - A 6.8 - A 7.0 - Orcrall - A R_l A RJ - 3 liasnc 522 & Enusnce \fadismi VillageLSB,r silv,F✓eJ r131. - C 32.5 221 1 D 531 205 GB1t 250 C 29.0 48 1) 51.0 55 Fit LOS C 3n.9 1) 52.1 NI31. 200 A 8.9 37 A 6.3 106 11111111, A 04 114 A 02 73 NB,r R LOS _ A 23 - A 1.7 SB'r . 1314.6 193 A 9.3 249 Si31t 275 11la0 45 A 90 43 R LOS B 14.5 A 9.2 Oscmll R 14.6 11 123 a Route 522 & Papcmu➢ RoaJ Sigubvcd 1:81R - 1) 54A 334 1' 862 796 Elf LOS - 1) 54.4 - P 86.2 - NI3'L 425° C 31.9 163 1' 13.2 316 N B'r A 7.7 25 B 14.5 I I I NB'r - tiNilLOS - 111.1.2 - 1) 33.6 - C 24.3 315 1)51 9 486 SB WI IR SR I.Os C 2.1.3 D 51.9 Overall C 25.2 1)53.8 S Rouse 522 & 3LLslcs Drn'c S Wi3n. 225 C 29.0 115 1)50.0 115 WI36t w C 22.2 78 1)46.2 52 \\T3 LOS C 249 1)47.8 N 13? B 12.2 201 A 6.4 197 MIT N13'R 325 A 5.5 25 A 2.0 25 Nil LOS - II 10.4 - A 6.0 - SR9. 375 ° B 11 0 26 A 4.0 25 SIYr B 12 9 25 A 0.1 72 S13'r SD LOS B 12.2 - A 0.5 - Ovcrall ❑ 13.4 A 7.0 (1) (2) Tum-Lnc (3)I-0S (4) Signabvcd (5) SIDItA (6) G13 - Eastbound. WB-Wesibound. k tigil s do na and Delay %slues cakub(cd mtersecumi 95di Uusigrulued mcrsecuon used fm romidebout Rctripmg recommended NB - Northbound. SR Somhh-od. mcludc taper AD %slues arc a�rtnmv Ic. a di IICN mcdl !oiogry usmg S)mchro pereerule Rack of Oucuc values calcuL,md and mienccoon 92 reu,khbous 95di percctiWc al mtcrsecta;i nl I. I.cft,'C'rbm, 8. SIDRA mng prnprwtary Back of Queue It used for S),mhro velucs Right roundabout R nethodology. calcuLued at intersect- Atatnnum wall IIChI 41. assumed methodology to be 25 usmg Syncrho f<el 8 DFiOL1404 Page 43 PeliX7 o>i"!' d o o 170 (142) ♦M 63 (246) ilk jr 170 (142) 4 430 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5()=,*, 260 (131) 1111111111111110 5 (8) ao to 111,6201' ao `- 12 v (7) 48 (27) Site C'ni'.m; tf o 22,220 \ Approximate Site Boundary 0 x 51 I E I s� I \� SITE 22,450 12,250 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS IVTURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,011i1 WEEKDAYADT N papzrMnill644) Road (1Lou= 23,660 o 0- cv � O N .0 Madison Village ti Entrance 349(199).0 1 t 286 (155) M M �o v ^iZ, 7 - r r Papermill Road = 1 Route 644) 1 t 158(238).0 218(430) _ i7 z m v K Juste - 3,760 16 215 (120) 141 (88) Justes Drive t v a o N N L " L FREEDOM MANOR 2020 TOTAL FIGURE 15 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIIOL1404 FREDERICK COl1NTY, VA luvt 13015 O i Gntrancc Madison Village A(1)� t-�- )VERALL LOS = A (A) \ Approximate Site -, Boundary i = i SITL: J r-- � �I I / L- — — —� SrrL i Papermi11644) Road ([tout A (A) Q Site Entrance o � = Q ca OVERALL LOS = A (B) LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS UP LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N N IS.. O B (A) d d ii TU O 4: O rllVlly �IIVI�y w � Madison Village Lc. ^ Entrance q C (D) U C (D) C3� Q Q � A (A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) '+ N W) O O o� Papermill Read u (Route 644) � ^ D (F)* � � m U d B(D) OVERALL LOS = C (D) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). 1u=tes Drive O B (A) Q m m C (D) C C (D) �. Justes Drive 1 T OVERALL LW; - B (A) r= FREEDOM MANOR 2020 TOTAL FIGURE 16 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS D11OL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 4uguxr2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 8. ANALYSIS OF 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Background traffic volumes represent future traffic that would travel through the study area intersections without the proposed Freedom Manor development. The background traffic volumes were projected as outlined below. a) Traffic Growth The annual traffic growth rate of 1.5% continued to be used for the 2026 background conditions. The 2026 volumes grown at 1.5% annually are shown in Figure 17. b) Approved / Unbuilt Background Developments No new additional background developments were projected for 2026 background conditions. The background developments used for 2020 background conditions, Madison Village and Frederick County Fourth High School, were also used for 2026 background conditions. Therefore, the 2026 and 2020 background development traffic assignments are identical. The background development traffic assignments are shown again in Figure 18 for continuity. Site assignments for Madison Village will include diversions for access to Papermill Road for the total conditions scenario. Individual background development distributions and assignments, as well as Madison Village Commercial's pass -by assignments are shown in Appendix D of this report (Figures DI-D5). c) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The 2026 background traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours, shown in Figure 19, were determined by adding the 2026 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 18, to the 2026 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 17. d) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 8 and Figure 20 show the anticipated 2026 background lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. DHOL1404 Page 46 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Ana lvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 n Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout: single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) The volumes have not changed from 2020 background conditions and the roundabout continues to operate at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "D" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and degrade to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach degrades to LOS "F" while the Route 522 southbound approach degrades to LOS "E". As noted in the 2020 conditions, HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). For the background conditions with optimization, the AM eastbound queue is at 310 ft while. the PM queue as a single lane with right turn on red allowed is estimated at 830 ft. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. Providing a 325 ft right turn lane and right -turn overlap phase would improve AM peak hour approach LOS to "C" in the AM peak hour and "D" in the PM peak hour with queues at 250 ft. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. 1 Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 47 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure 20 and Table 8 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix G, labeled as "2 Lane EB". For the PM peak, the 95°i percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length. To accommodate the queue, lengthening the available storage to 350 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to-back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 50 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive, which is not an issue for the peak queues. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2026 background conditions are included in Appendix G of this report. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 48 O 0 Entrance Madison Village Q I 10,530 A 0 M 1 a II 19,6501 19,650 \ Approximate Site Boundary 0 x x I � G SHE J I I / — — SITE 19,650 tI 10,530 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,(11111 WEEKDAYADT N papermill644 (toad (Route 22,340 s Z' O y Y N x T Madison Village It Entrance T ® y x �I 7 � Trq y o Papermill Road ( Route 644) 74 (145) 155 (445) Justes Drive 2,930 o 00 V. 141 (84) 6U (49) Justes Drive t — ri vl M 7 c, x — -r, ac x o — ti REEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND GROWTH FIGURE 1CIE rR \F>:IC IMP.ACTSTUDN TRAFFIC VOLUMES `"""""' FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Aagms/ 2W urn r. _, " x % 170 (142) Aksm ♦M 63 (246) 170 (142) 4 430 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5()MO 260 (131) =Ej0- z r` 0 i 1.780 J1 4,970 1 3,770 * Madison Village N Approximate Site Boundary O I T I e i SITE J ° I �> Sit[ 4,000 Pape�ill Road (Route 1,780 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) ,0(10 WEEKDAY ADT 4) 2.860 ri 1 T w 0, y O N L� Madison Village 1 Entrance 349(189).0 1 t 286 (155) ^ N * negative volume due to pass -by trips % N O 2 Papermill Road (Route 644) 63(91)MO 55(12)� N � Justes Drive High School T r 86 (;3 ) 1 � � 86 (43) Iustes Dricc — tf ^I T y z� oc Y FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 18 I R FFtC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS D11OL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Augusr2015 o r % 170 (142) rn ilk 4M 63 (246) Ar l70 (142) 4,4301 Entrance• Madison Village 8,460 5 (8) �* Ti t 260 (131) Emp, 5 (8) _ M � x 0 1� U 12,310 24,620 23,420 Approximate Site Boundary - C I I I i SITE C I SITE _.------------� 12,310 LEGEND 01 STUDY INTERSECTIONS It� TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) l,(lllll WEEKDAYADT GD Papermill Road �R 25,200 o C fV O N rA N N � ^• Madison Village iitrance 349(189).0 1 t 286 (155) X �. x x O Y a N N d M O 30 0 Papermill Road 11 J (Route 644) 1 t 137(235).0 210 (456) � i:� T � N N r 227 (127) 146 (92) Drive �' tJustes ■ Lx FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 19 TRAFFIC IMPACT STwy' TRAFFIC VOLUMES D„013404 FREDEMCK COUNTY, VA 11c"I at?01i A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 8: 2026 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS >E Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ t Approach Existing/ Proposed turn -lane r lengths (feet) AM Peak flour PNI Peak flour a LOS a Dchty (in sec) Back of as Qucuc (in feet) � LOS } Delay (in sec) Back of as Queue (in feet) 2 Madison Village Entrance & Mad. V1L Commercial Street Roundabout EBILTR A 9.9 50 A 6.2 25 Ell LOS A 9.9 - A 6.2 1 - WB/LTR A 7.4 50 A 9.7 75 WB LOS A 7.4 - A 9.7 - NBIUIR A 9.3 25 A 5.8 25 NB LOS A 9.3 - A 5.8 - SB,'rIR A 6.9 25 A 7.0 25 SB LOS A 6.8 - A 7.0 - Overtll A 8.3 - A 8.3 - 3 Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance Sigmlvcd EB/L - C 33.6 226 D 53.6 205 EB/R 250 C 29.8 59 D 51.0 55 EB LOS - C 31.9 - D 52.5 - NB/L 225 A 9.2 110 A 6.7 123 NB/r A 0 A 205 A 0.2 163 NB/r N13 LOS A 2.3 - A 1.7 - SB/r B 14.9 198 A 9.5 273 SB/r - SB/R 275 B 13.9 43 A 9.0 43 SB LOS - 13 14.7 - A 9.3 Overall 13 14.7 - 13 12.2 - 4 Route 522 & Papctnnll Road Signalized EB/LR D 53.0 310 1- 95.8 831 Eli LOS - D 53.0 - F 95.8 - NB/L 3506 C 30.1 170 P 91.4 349 NB/r - A 7.3 27 B 15.9 161 NB/I' NB LOS 13 13.4 - D 35.9 - S B/I' C 20.2 335 E 71.6 535 SWIR SB LOS C 20.2 - E 71.6 - Overnll - C 22.2 - E 64.2 5 Route 522 & luster Drive Signalized WB/L 225 C 33.1 138 D 49.4 119 WB/R - C 24.2 89 D 46.0 69 WB LOS - C 27.7 - D 47.5 - NB/I' - B 11.9 206 A 6.8 216 NB/1' - NB/R 325 A 5.6 26 A 2.0 25 NB LOS - B 10.3 - A LA- SB/L 4506 B 11.9 25 A 4.3 25 SB/1' B 12.6 25 A 0.0 IOR SB/1' SB LOS 13 12.3 - A 0.6 - Overall 13 13.9 A 7.0 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Lett, I:1 hro, W light (2) Turn -Lane lengths do not include taper. All values are approximate. (3) LOS and Dehy values calculated with HCM methodology using Synchro 8. (4) Signalbcd intersection 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated using Synchro 8 proprietary methodology. Minimum assumed to be 25 feet. (5) Synchro 8 unsignalized intersection and intersection 42 roundabout 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated with HCM methodology using Synchro 8. (6) Retriping recommended. DHOL1404 Page 52 Pennoni 0 i e 2 3 +i<� A (A) Entrancr Madison Village — Approximate Site N Boundary OVERALL LOS = A (A) v I � SITE I I L — — — / SITL. 0 goad LEGEND 0 STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN JTRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) C19) O B (A) Y I r d N a _ � CJ o � Madison Village ^ Entrance C (D) 0;Z- C (D) d d 4 A (A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) ^ x � N U o =+ w Papermill Road L LL jul' (Route 644) D (F)* B (D) OVERALL LOS = C (E) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' - 65' taper). Justes Drive O B (A) d C v v - = C (D) G+ C (D) L g� Justes Dnve 4I^h4I/�h a �r �'n d tY °J m Q 0 tY B OVERALL (A) LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 20 IRAH IC IMPACTSTUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS INIOL1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 1ugu'r 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 9. ANALYSIS OF 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The interparcel connection between the Freedom Manor and Madison Village to the north was assumed to be open for 2026 total conditions, giving trips for both developments a choice between two entrances. Consequently, Madison Village and Freedom Manor traffic assignments needed to be altered. The resulting 2026 background development traffic assignments with the interparcel connection, which includes the high school trips that don't need to be modified, are shown in Figure 21. Figure D5 and Figure D6 in Appendix D show the distribution and assignment percentages, and trip assignments, respectively, for only the Madison Village development with the interparcel connection with Freedom Manor. The 2026 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 17, were added to the 2026 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 21, to get 2026 background traffic volumes with the interparcel connection, in Figure 22. As shown in Table 9, Phase 2 of the proposed Freedom Manor development adds additional site trips to the road network. Also, as noted above, the trip assignments need to be altered as a result of the interparcel connection with Madison Village. As shown on Figure 23, the estimated regional distributions stay the same with 45%, 35%, and 20%, via Route 522 to the north, Route 522 to the south, and Papermill Road to the northwest, respectively. However, the site traffic assignments at the intersections were modified, with 35% of Freedom Manor trips estimated to utilize the Madison Village Entrance on Route 522. Site build -out trips assigned using the modified traffic assignments to obtain 2026 site (build -out) traffic assignments in Figure 24. The 2026 background traffic volumes with the interparcel connection, shown in Figure 22, were added to the 2026 site (build -out) traffic assignments, shown in Figure 24, to arrive at 2026 total traffic volumes with the subject site, in Figure 25. DHOL1404 Page 54 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 9: SITE TRIP GENERATION 7TF Land LSr (1) 1 AM Ph -AK HOUR P31 PLAK )(OUR DAILY COnE conE DEAS@' LYL Ln LY 12-ur ZI2L1L 41 via ZOT.47. Trip Generation By Right 210 210190 70 DU Single-Fam Dec (VDOT) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables FII.%SF. 1 (2020) 210 210I711 100 DU c SF Res. a 100 DU (usingEQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 I,O50 210 210100 100 DU Single-Fam. Det (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD-OU9' (20261 230 230000 200 DU Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 15 73 88 70 34 1011 1,172 230 230160 •10 DU a TH Res @40 DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 231400 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton Distria Rate) 23 78 101 83 47 130 1,303 Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily F-ffective Tnp Rates (3,3) (L-My.) X3e§ssn9 (3--,,yay3 %Irtgsed WeekdaY. 210 Single-Fam D3 .(%T)OT) DU 0.76 251,1r 1.00 63% 1000 210 SF Res. @, 100 DU DU 0.80 2511r 0.91 63% 10.50 A%ii 210 Single-f m Dd. DU 0.75 231,: 1.00 63% 9.52 AW 230 Townhouse DU 0.44 I'll/ 052 67% 5.96 230 Tll Res tea, 40 DU DU 0.63 16% 0.70 68% 7.25 Townhouse (VDOT St.mmon 21mn Itate) DU 0.63 23% 0.81 61% 8.14 TRIP FATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition ), Institute of Transpoaallon Engineers; 2012. Average trip rates used, unless noted with'e', then equations used at size shaem, with data sot OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SO> 110 % of ave. (1) ITE Land Code shown as the first 3 digits. Decimal shwm for Internal use by Pennoni for lookup InWo for trip mto v.dade. (2) EOecuvo trip rates calculated by land uso: For avenge ntn = (Demlry) x (ave. n/p nw) = 2-way Trips ; x (inbound pi—erntage) for Trips In Far RE equadons,'e' nomd = (Density) x ( trip equadon) = 2-vny Trips ; x (Inbound p—eige) for Trips In (3) Assumed 80% of lo+.nhouses at Staunton District e0oauw Rates for townhouse, condo, or apartment. DHOL1404 Page 55 Pennoni JC a M rl �145(121) rl 145 (121) L• 3,540 [nuN11(.�1S011 Entrance ~\,J\\���� 2,320 Entrance NI, soil Village ' Madison Village 7,010 � Village 349(189).0 39 (29 � .z 178 (98) OR (105) 2 y 39 (29) r _ = Approsinudc Site 2 By oundary �l o ° In 1 negative volume due to pass -by trips (sec Appendix Figure D3) i S I 1 L• L � I ! I 1,780 _ J — y SITE. SA` a I)apermill Road (Route644) 16 (23).0 11 t 82 (26) � M r� rl OBI l r' 12l ad ((tpUlC [ 1,050 — �-r � sl (43) r 27 (14) 2,8i)0 1 Site Entrance ' Justes Uri1c high School 1 , 2,080 0 f "l CN %m 86(43) 86 (43) i Jnstes Drive G ' LEGEND '( 0 STUDY INTERSECTIONS ; ;; M -- TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,0(10 WEEKDAYADT ' FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 21 TRAFFIC IN FACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS D1100 „0.1 w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Am'uw 201, �' 24,C20 . y =�%145(121) 2 3 pia o r� .o on 145 (121) oo ,�e 3,540 Entrance v �,���� Z 1 ,O ]Q Madison Village ' Madison Village 7,010 Entrance 39 (29) mo 349 089) 208 (105) �� t n 178 (98) 2( _ ^ Approximate Site39 y (`) ° Boundary '� � �n 1 i cz SITE J c 12,310 1 T r� SI _ 22,200 rl M � Y I'E ti4c Papermill Road 1,460 (Route 644) 90(167).0 1 t ' 237 (471) I p,gncr»till � M ,Zuutc 6d41 4 r, ' M % 81 (43) ,, (,4) 25,200 ` Site Entrance 5 Justes DritU ^ 1 5,010 �v x� 24,100 Q 5 Y rl _ r L % 227 (127) G 146 (92) 1 1UStes Drive G ' LEGEND RQI STUDY INTERSECTIONS ■te J a ' TURNING MOVEMENTS Ic 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) F 1,00(1 WEEKDAYADT L ' FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 22 TR.\1:FIC' IiVII)ACTSTt;1)Y TRAFFIC VOLUMES 1)11011404 w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA .Igqur_'ol5 i i o 45% o 1 y �ri 0 0 � 1 C; M uo �c u Entrance Madison Village ' Madison \'illagc Durance (35%) mmol, f i (5'%>) Approximate Site ^ r, Boundary G c. i� 20 /o II SIII: n ' \ SITF ) f Pal CC Road I \ ` _ J (ROUIC 644) 1 (3U%) > iO ")Cl ` Road (�Zuutc 64 !) 4 i Site Entrance Justcs Drite .-r t� 5 ~ � o l f O T G N i � v Justes Drive i LEGEND = t J OI STUDY INTERSECTIONS tTURNING MOVEMENTS 3 5 % � 10%(10%) Inbound %(Outbound %) N 1 i FREEDOM MANOR 2026 SITE (BUILD -OUT) FIGURE 23 TRAFFIC INIPACT STUDY TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS """" 0.1 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 'tutlw 2015 i 1 G r4 K O J *M 16 (56) 7 3 �\•�\`��530 Madison Village 930 Entrance Madison Village 930 Entrance ' 56 (32) �� r� Approximate Site ii (5) = r� � Boundary r' 1 G G SITE 530 `� 1 G ri y 1 530 SlTl r x c K 1,720 Papermill Road (ROnte 644) J — 'fit 24(I4).0 18 (27) M% » v ti, ri Papermlll6a4) It,ll:id (IiUUII' 4 1,190 M 32 (18) 930 Site Entrance Justes Drive 1 t� 5 0 r� 930 G r� r l n tv 7 �f 1 .lustes Drive 1 LEGEND L s tf QI STUDY INTERSECTIONS — 1 TURNING MOVEMENTS L ' 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) j,000 WEEKDAYADT j L 1 1 FREEDOM MANOR 2026 SITE (BUILD -OUT) FIGURE 24 ' TRAI:FIC IMhACTSru°v TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS D1100.104 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Au,qucr 2015 1 OM ]G �l n %145 (121) _ ♦MG7 (Z52) 14� (121) 4,470 Entrance Madison Village 7,940 39(29)mo 263 (136) --ol. x o 39 (29) r O � M M � o 113 (61) Entrance tSite ■ C T Y f _ T T 25,810 22,500 rl fl Approximate Site ^ Boundary G C SIT J I I SrrE 22,730 1,,lpenllill d {load (Ituulc 64 1 12,770 LEGEND QI STUDY INTERSECTIONS I't a TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) j,000 WEEKDAYADT f 26.130 0 J 1 t �G G rl 7 Vj o' 3 rl •c •- � iMadlsoll Village L• Entrance 397(216)I$ I86(102)� f x ^i o r 4 v ^J Papermill Road L V (ROtlte 644) '1 t 114 (181).0 285 (498) n a ri r` Just— ti_ p�- 5,U 10 O rl Y 227 (127) M � 1 � � lab (9z) Justes Dricc 1 G rl � 7 M N o ri f• r FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 25 • TR:\PFicl�Tl'A('r SI"U1)Y TRAFFIC VOLUMES D110L/161 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Ji.ifi 1 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analyses Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 10 and Figure 26 show the anticipated 2026 total scenario lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8 and SIDRA for the proposed roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road, the following results were observed: Intersection #1: Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Roundabout) The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable approach LOS "A" for the AM peak hour and at an overall LOS "B" in the PM peak, with all approaches operating at an LOS "C" or better. Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout': single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) This roundabout continues to operate at overall LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "B" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. HCS 2010 LOS was utilized since operations are generally below capacity and the location is off -site on a local street. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at overall LOS "E" during the PM peak hour, with or without the site. The eastbound approach operates at LOS "E" during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, with or without the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach 1 Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Paintcr-Lcwis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. DHOL1404 Page 61 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 continues to operate at LOS "F" while the Route 522 southbound approach operates at LOS "E". For the AM peak, the overall delay increases from LOS "D" to LOS "E" with the peak hour queues increasing from 310 feet to 352 feet with the site and as a single lane approach. For the PM peak without improvements, the LOS "F" delay increases the queues slightly from 831 feet to 840 ft with the site. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. For the total conditions, the lane is not shown in the LOS graphics, to gauge the change of site traffic. For long-term conditions, the LOS is shown as an alternative with a 325 ft long extension of the right turn lane (with 100 ft taper) and a right turn overlap phase to verify queues adequately. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. As shown in Table 10, the overall AM peak LOS improves from LOS "E" to LOS "C" with the turn lane and side street queues reduced to approximately 310 ft. However, these improvements are not proposed directly with this subject application, since the site trips at this signal are only 2.8 percent of the short-term traffic volumes on Papermill Road, and only 5.4 percent for the long-term conditions, as shown in Table 9A below. t TABLE 9A: SITE IMPACT AT PAPERMILL ROAD Approach Site Trips Total Volumes Site Impacts 2020 PM Peak Hour EASTBOUND RIGHT Papennill Rd 12 430 2.8% EASTBOUND Papermill Rd 27 668 4.1% NORTHBOUND Route 522 20 1020 2.0% SOUTIIBOUND Route 522 26 964 2.7% TOTAL 73 2653 2.7% 2026 PM Peak Hour EASTBOUND RIGHT Papennill Rd 27 498 5.4% EASTBOUND Papennill Rd 41 678 6.0% NORTHBOUND Route 522 56 1135 4.9% SOUTHBOUND Route 522 28 983 2.9% TOTAL 125 2796 4.5% DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 62 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 With site impacts at less than 6 percent of the future traffic and the off -site improvements required to mitigate background conditions, the requirement to install as part of the Freedom Manor rezoning is not justified. The 95t" percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length. To provide additional stacking, lengthening the storage to 425 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to- back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 125 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Although the lengths are different, lengthening the northbound left -turn lanes is recommended with or without the site. Intersection #S: Route S22 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better. The Synchro 8 and SIDRA worksheets for 2026 Total conditions are included in Appendix H of this report. DHOL1404 Page 63 Pennons A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised Ausust 12, 2015 TABLE 10: 2026 TOTAL LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS N Int-ec0on '1'nllic Control Inc Group/ i Approach Eshling/ Proposed tum4ane Icngtlua (feel) AN Peak flour I'M Peak flour s LOS s Delay, (In ace) [sack of a., Queue (In feet) 1,05 s Delay (Irt sec) [lack of as Qucuc (in feel) I 1'apcnrtM Road & Sie E nun c Roundabout Wilful - A 94 33 A 7.7 25 Wit LOS - A 9.4 A 7.7 - NIirIK - A 8.9 65 Is 12.1 103 till LOS A 8.9 - 11 12.1 - SI14-T - E A HA 50 C I8.0 205 Sls IDS - A 8.4 - C 18.0 - Oaenll A 8.8 - It 14.8 2 Madison VEL ge Entramc Road & Mad. VLIL Conmmul Street Itomdabout HUTR - Il 10.9 75 A 6.7 25 Eli LOS - Is 10.9 - A 6.7 WIL4:112 - A 7.5 50 A 9.7 75 Wls I,OS A 7.5 - A 9.7 - NDl:IIt - A 9A 25 A 5.9 25 NR I,OS - A 9.4 A 5.9 SIVI-IR - A 6.9 25 A 7.1 25 Sit LOS - A 6.9 A 7.1 - Oscnll A 8.8 A 8.3 3 Route 522 & Madison Va ge 19nrarxc Sibnu)bcd IJ19- - C 33.3 245 D 52.5 227 19srR 250 C 21.5 38 D 43.5 44 Ell LOS - C 29.5 1) 49.6 NI11- 200 A 9.6 25 A 6.4 51 NIVF - A 0.5 172 A 0.2 86 NR'I' - Nis I.OS A 1.8 A 1.2 - SIVr - 11 I5.5 201 A 9.3 275 swr - SD9t 275 17 14.7 44 A 9.2 45 Sit 1.05 11 15.3 A 9.3 - Oaenll - If 14.1 - it 11.4 - 4 Roucc 522 & Papcmnll Road Sit -Hued I-IfUl - 1? 56.5 352 1' 114.8 840 EIS LOS - E 56.5 - f 114.8 - ND'L 425' 1) 35A 194 1' 100.0 406 N D'r A 8.5 ]G 13 13.6 117 NUT - NR I.OS - Is 16.3 - 1) 40.8 - SIt'l' C 33.2 328 li 70.3 520 S1VIR S111.0S C 33.2 E 70.3 Oaenll C 29.8 E: 69.6 4 Route 522 & Papcmdl Road SiFml--d Akcnnthc,sh Ills Ri& Turn l-arc Kmeft ion and Oanthp Pl vac E7L9- - C 27.5 100 C 27.7 145 Hill. 325 C 33.7 123 F &1.7 307 E13 LOS - C 31.9 - D 54.8 - Ntil- 300 R 15.5 65 C 24.4 195 ND? - Is 13.5 25 A 3.2 25 N wr - IN If LOS - II 14.1 - A 9.8 - SILT' - C 25.3 J7 C 33.5 272 SIVIR - C 25.3 C 33.6 S11110S C 25.3 C 33.5 0sen11 C 21.5 - C 294 - 5 Rome 522 & Imtes Urisc S15.a-d WILL 225 C 33.1 138 D 49.5 119 WILK - C 24.2 91 D 46.1 73 K'is LOS - C 27.7 1) 47.5 NIVr - Il 12,0 206 A 7.0 234 NIL'r Nit 325 A 5.6 27 A 20 25 NIs LOS it 10.4 A 6.6 SILL 375s R 12.1 25 A 4.5 25 SILrr n 13.0 zs n 0.0 xx iron - S13 LOS 11 12.7 A 0.6 Oaenll 1 - It 14.0 - A 7.0 - (1)lilt =last,-d,Wit -Wesib-1, Nit -Ne Vbut.a,au--l00000,s,:-, n. nn .-po (2) l -L,,,e kogd. do not include Wtxr. An vai- arc al;.axon tc. (3)LOS and Uchy valises eakuhtcd vKh I1CM nxdwdology miig Synchro H. SIDRA ascd for ruuntLiNnit at 4it-cclim to I. (4) Sti;-[-d i-cet on 950h I --sine Rack of Qucuc wit- cakuLued miig 1-1,6eusry Syrnobm x nxthalukntry. Musirnun a-voed to be 25 feet. (5) Unais&-dened i t-cctisns and intersect-a.12 rus.dabwt 95ds Ixrcenule [luck Of Queue values cnkuUted wih IIC%( mc0u1n1ogy miig Syncrho x. SIDRA mid for roundabuut at ote-wo a 1. (6) Rmpiig rectmmxndcd DHOL1404 Page 64 Pennoni 0 I `/l_�JjII Entrance Madison Village B (1A) g"" ^ I OVERALL LOS —A (r\) U_ •: I MI �'I\/Ij✓ Site Entrance 'J � I OVERALL LOS -A(13) `v\ Approximate Site 130unJary V SI F L LEGEND OI STUDY INTERSECTIONS VpLANE GEOMETRY ' STOP SIGN ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) I Srrr_ p;,p,;rt» bAal Road Rom (D Pig I I C' rl 7, J L L Madison Village q Entrance C (`)) =51 ^ ^ U C (U) I I OVERALL LOS —13(11) 1 C- rl �n ^J jIILu1I'j'jlll, Papermill Road n y (Route 0=14) aLjr- OVERALL LOS - C U•a ` Analynd as one lane approach because ol"short right turn storage (3Y • 65' taper). When analyzed as two lanes, oscrall I'M I:B approach LOS "D". Sec Table 10 for details. Justcs Dritr �I C (U) m �✓� Drive (/JJustes ri I^ S J OVI�.R:ALI. LOS —13(A) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 26 TRAFFIC IWPACI•STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 011OL1l01 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA m:u,t '41 i IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 10. TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS ' 2020 and 2026 total volumes at the Papermill Road & Site Entrance intersection were analyzed for left and right -turn lane warrants found in the VDOT Roar! Design Manual, if a ' conventional at -grade intersection were pursued for the site access. t As shown in Table 11, the 2020 total traffic volumes do not meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane on the northbound Papermill Road approach but the PM peak hour volumes meet for a taper. As shown in Table 12, the 2026 total traffic volumes in the PM ' peak hour meet the warrant for a full -width right -turn lane on the northbound Papermill Road approach. ' As shown in Table 13, the 2020 total volumes for the PM peak hour meet the warrant for a left -turn lane on the southbound Papermill Road approach. As shown in Table 14, the 2026 total volumes for both the AM and PM peak hours meet the warrant for a left -turn lane on the southbound Papermill Road approach. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the ' northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in this revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout ' justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedorn Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. DHOL1404 Page 66 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 11 TABLE 11: RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) Papermill Road at Site Entrance Northbound Right -Turn Lane 40 20 NOTC ti L�%ES 4 UtCT_t?£RS1 Ei-7Lgx*D — — 410 L- t-- - --f— I 5GJ I, 100 200 300 400 I - 2)0 7C0 Niv APPROACH TOTAL, VERICl.C.3 PLA ROUrt Apprvpria'e Radius regr,.r=d a1 st1 IrA yecticrs .,nd Entranr_s,:Ccmmercat cr ::7m,-a1e'j Pennoni Peak Hour: AM PM Papermill Road NB Approach Total 471 VPH 500 VPH Right Turns 16 VPH 46 VPH % Right Turns 3.4% 9.1% Right Turn Lane Warrant - Not Satisfied, Only Taper Required LEGEND PHV . Peal, Hour Volume talso Design Hourly Volume egpnvalenli Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds al or under •1` mph, PHI/ right turns - 10, and PHV total - 300 Adjusted ngln Runs = PHV Right Tums 20 It PHV Is not known use formula PHV = AD r x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurn119 m the peak hour D = the percent of traffic m the peak direction of Ilow Note .An average of I I'. for K x D will sufhco FIGURE 3.26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) DHOL1404 Page 67 IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 201S I I I I I I I I I TABLE 12: RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS) Papermill Road at Site Entrance Northbound Right -Turn Lane 120 im 0 rULL-0 TH TURN LAi4r AND TA P 1711 11 rQUIT;rD Cr - -------- - ............ L "0 TAPEnnEQUMCID N. .. .... .. ... IZ -KN L _tNE S X. NO Ti OR TXPERS REQL=_D j Ito 200 3DO 400 1 SOD I coo 700 P14V APPROACH TOTAL. VFJ-4:CLF_S PLPI HOUR ,:%p r-, r. n a e ;RNJ, u s r u i I r.t.: r s;,L, c t I c•r, N n d 6 n tr a r, c, n I n I �- r CAI Cc ten, 40 -400- Peak Hour: AM PM Papermill R oad UB Approach Total 441 VP H 542 VPH Right Turns 37 VPHI 94 VPH Right Turns 8.4% 11.4% I I Right Turn Lane Warrant - Full -width turn -lane Required Pennoni P Hv P, ." dljlr),�, -it- :) C "'.rin I - ow tj ]w . . .... jow-II.,111, Adjustment for RIght Turn-9 F(*,f o ilod 1s :]:,)r (I[!- 1_•I 11:fl 1 filli'll 111ms Al Jnd pll�, ;,A,11 - Vlf) Al I u -1 1, i t I I I - - I t I I : 1. f IV, - N I V RI I I 1 1 u f I I If PH'. n ri,--' FJjr ',I) tj­ fc'rjjjjjja PF1Y /•.[Ij C' K -* T,,a AAr,1 ij((Ufrll*),) hrnu 0 - lh•? I "Tc,vt rA "ralfic if) 11;a I cv1. h m of 'Not., All I.."n of I I " Irr V i [) FIr2VRE J-24 QVIVELINE$ FQR RIGHT TARN TREATMENT 12-L,04NE HIQHWAY) DHOL1404 Page 68 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 13: LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) 2020 Build -out Conditions Papermill Road & Site Entrance ' Papermill Road Southbound Left -Turn VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX F TABLE 3-1: WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON 2 LANE HWY OPPOSING VOLUME (Vo) eph ADVANCING VOLUME (Va) Kph SPEED (MPH) 50 50 50 50 LEFT TURN % 5% 10% 20% 30% 350 800 280 210 165 135 ' 420 600 350 280 195 170 540 400 4190, 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 Calculations AM PEAK 40 if Va L % L Vo 471 VPH 332 VPH 1.2% 4 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 71 540 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -80 -28 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 1.2% 540 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 5% -110 -27 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 540 -28 -27 Va warrant = 485 versus actual 332 OK, NOT WARRANTED Calculations PM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 501 VPH 652 VPH 1.7% 11 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 101 540 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -120 -61 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 1.7% 540 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 5% -70 -24 ' y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 540 -61 -24 Va warrant = 456 versus actual 652 WARRANTED ' Fgure Source: VDOT Road Design Manual, Calculations by Ponnonl � w Peak Hour: AM PM ' Left Turns 4 VPH 11 VPH % Left Turns 1.2% 1.7% Advancing Volume (Papermill Rd SB Approach) 332 VPH 652 VPH Opposing Volume (Papermill Rd NB Approach) 471 VPH 501 VPH SB Left Turn Lane Warrant - Satisfied ' DHOL1404 Page 69 Pennoni ' A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 14: LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS) ' 2026 Build -out Conditions Papermill Road & Site Entrance ' Papermill Road Southbound Left -Turn VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX F TABLE 3-1: WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON 2 LANE HWY ' OPPOSING VOLUME (Vo) Kph ADVANCING VOLUME (Va) Kph SPEED (MPH) 50 50 50 50 ' LEFT TURN % 5% 10% 20% 30% 800 280 210 165 135 600 350 280 ,% 195 170 400 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 ' Calculations AM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 441 VPH 357 VPH 16.0% 57 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for ' y DELTA 41 320 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -40 -8 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Della of Va for x DELTA 6.0% 320 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS ' x INCRM 10% -80 A8 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 320 -8 A8 Va warrant = 264 versus actual 357 ' WARRANTED Calculations PM PEAK if Va L % L ' Vo 542 VPH 724 VPH 13.8% 100 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 142 320 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo ' y INCRM 200 -40 -28 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Della of Va for x DELTA 3.8% 320 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 10% -80 -30 ' y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 320 -28 -30 Va warrant = 261 versus actual 724 WARRANTED ' Fgure Source: VDOT Road Design Manual, Calculations by Ponnoni Peak Hour: AM PM Left Turns 57 VPH 100 VPH ' % Left Turns 16.0% 13.8% Advancing Volume (Papermill Rd SB Approach) 357 VPH 724 VPH Opposing Volume (Papermill Rd NB Approach) 441 VPH 542 VPH ' SB Left Turn Lane Warrant - Satisfied ' DHOL1404 Page 70 Pennani IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 I11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ' Based on the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed subject development and the evaluation of 2014 existing conditions, 2020 background conditions, 2020 total conditions, 2026 background conditions, and 2026 total conditions, it was found that the ' surrounding roadway network can adequately accommodate the proposed site densities. The conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows: ' a) Trip Generation The proposed development would be built in two phases. Phase 1 is ' planned for initial site access for the single-family residential community with access to Papermill Road and would generate 1,050 daily trips, 80 trips during the AM peak hour, and 91 trips during the PM peak hour. Build -out ' of the project with access to Madison Village is projected to generate a total of 2,643 daily trips, 206 trips during the AM peak hour, and 249 trips during the PM peak hour. b) Intersections Papermill Road (Route 644) & Site Entrance ' This unsignalized intersection is proposed to be built as a roundabout with Phase 1 of the project for primary site access. Phase 2 of the project would introduce Madison Village trips as well with the proposed interparcel connection. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable overall LOS "B" ' under both Phase 1 and Phase 2 conditions, with approach LOS at "C" or better conditions. ' Without a roundabout, the westbound approach out of the site during the 2026 PM peak hour is projected to operate at LOS "E" primarily, due to the high through volumes on Papermill Road. There were no projected ' queueing issues. Signalization is not anticipated to be warranted at the site entrance. Without a roundabout, a southbound Papermill Road left -turn lane and a northbound Papermill Road right -turn taper would be warranted with 2020 total PM peak hour volumes. The left -turn lane would be warranted with both AM and PM peak hour volumes under 2026 peak hour volumes. In addition, the 2026 PM peak hour volume would meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 71 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papennill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site ' properties, Pennoni has engaged several iterations of alternatives including reviewing minimum left turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W ' dedication would be available. As noted in previous meetings with VDOT, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) would not support partial dedications or easements to allow the Papermill Road ' widening to be shared between the property owners at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit the turn lane improvements along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even an option with a ' conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported by the adjacent property owner's representatives. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. ' Therefore, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. ' Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of ' Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes not proposed with this revision. ' Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Streets This proposed roundabout, to be built with and by the Madison Village ' project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "A" for all peak hours and analysis years. The roundabout was modeled as single -lane, with single -lane approaches and an inscribed diameter of 110 ft. Since this was an internal ' intersection off -site to Freedom Manor, the LOS is based on the HCM methodology as used in the Madison Village Traffic Study but updated with revised traffic volumes with Freedom Manor. ' iLfadison Village Entrance Road & Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) ' This proposed signalized intersection, also to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "B" for all peak hours and analysis years with approach LOS "D" or better. There were ' no projected queueing issues with the turn lane storage lengths suggested in this TIA. r Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "B" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D". Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 72 F IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' Under 2020 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D". Under 2026 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound ' approach would deteriorate further to LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "E". ' Under 2020 total conditions with the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach will operate at LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D" without improvements. Under 2026 total PM ' conditions, the overall intersection LOS would be an "E". To alleviate the undesirable LOS without the site and address eastbound and ' northbound queueing during the future analysis years, the following improvements are recommended, regardless of the subject site rezoning: ' 1. Lengthen the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn pocket, currently about 35 ft, to 325 ft. Due to the short existing turn lane, the LOS was shown without a separate turn lane in the revised ' analysis. 2. Incorporate an eastbound right -turn overlap phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase into the signal timing. ' 3. Lengthen northbound Route 522 northbound left -turn pocket by restriping the center lane on Route 522, currently about 300 ft, to ' 425 ft. F With these recommended improvements, the overall intersection LOS would improve to "C" or better and the right -turn storage would be sufficient for 95`f' percentile queues for the critical 2026 PM peak hours. Approach LOS would also improve to LOS "D" or better. Site impacts are negligible at the signal, at 2.7 percent of the intersection's total hourly traffic volume in the 2020 PM peak hour and 4.5 percent in the 2026 PM peak hour, with the PM peak hour being considered because it was worse than the AM peak hour. So off -site right turn lane (construction) is not recommended with site development. The site is providing Papermill Road improvements at its entrance. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Justes Di-Ne This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "A" in both peak hours, with all approach LOS at "B" or better. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 73 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 It will operate at overall LOS "B" under 2020 and 2026 background as well as total conditions. All the approaches will operate at LOS "D" or better. There were no observed queueing issues for any of the analysis years. c) Final Assessment: The proposed site densities can be adequately accommodated by the surrounding roadway network with a roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road as shown in Figure 3A. Off -site mitigations that could be considered by the County with or without the site are: 1. Lengthening of the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn lane at its intersection with Route 522 from the existing 35 ft to 325 ft. 2. At the same intersection, incorporating an eastbound right -turn overlap signal phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase. DHOL1404 Page 74 Pennoni L L I. 'To �— 3 :,a L -, G Pennoni PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS September 8, 2015 Candice Perkins, AICP Department of Planning & Development Frederick County 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Freedom Manor Revisions and Response to Comments Dear Candice, SEP 8 2015 f , - r Please find attached a revised proffer package along with a revised traffic impact analysis and roundabout justification for the Freedom Manor rezoning application for your review. The revised proffers propose an off -set single lane roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road to accommodate turning movements both in the short term and at full build -out without the need to acquire off -site right of way. I have included a redlined version of the revised proffer statement to identify changes made since the initial submission. In addition, I have attached a CD containing the digital files for the revised traffic study materials, including the appendices. Lastly, to aid in your review, the following is our response to the comments provided in your letter dated February 2, 2015: 1) Comment: Senseny/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land use Plan. The site is within the limits of the Sensney/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density) and high -density residential (12-16 units per acre). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis for phase 1 is shown at 3.4 units per acre and phase 2 at up to 14.4. While these densities and land uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan, there are not assurances that the area designated for high density area will develop as indicated. Response: The area designated as high density residential by the Comprehensive Plan is limited, by proffer, to single family attached or apartment dwelling units in order to achieve a higher dens?ty than a typical single family development. Ultimately, the market will dictate the end product type, but the prohibition of single family dwellings ensures that the area will development at a higher density as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. 2) Comment: Minimum Units. The Phase 2 area should include a proffer for a minimum density to ensure compliance with the high density residential designation in the comprehensive plan. Statements regarding the use of single family detached through TDR's in phase 2 should be removed as TDR's can be utilized for attached and multifamily units. The proffer as currently worded, allowing the single family detached in phase 2 would greatly reduce the density and would then not conform with the comprehensive plan. Response: With no final design in place, a proffered minimum number of units could prove problematic at final design/build-out if site constraints would not enable the site to meet that minimum. The end density will be dictated by the end housing type constructed in Phase 2, which is now limited to only single family attached or apartment dwellings to ensure a higher density yield in an effort to comply with the "high density residential" designation of the Comprehensive Plan. 117 East Piccadilly Street - Winchester, VA 22601 - Ph. 540-667-2139 - Fv 540-665-0493 www.pennoni.com e Cr-2C O rv,\� f-,o Freedom Manor September 8, 2015 Page 2 3) Comment: Site Development. Proffer 1.1 includes a statement regarding the use of TDR's in phase 2. Phase 2 would be developed for single family attached or apartment units "unless developed for single family detached dwellings under the County's Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance as provided for by proffer 5.1". Please note that TDR's can be utilized for all housing types, not only single family detached. A calculator is included in the TDR ordinance for the development of attached/multifamily units. If there is a desire to construct detached units in phase 2 it should be included in the permissible housing types and the "unless" statement removed along with a minimum density or unit number (not maximum). Response: As discussed in the responses for comments 1 and 2 above, the proffer statement has been revised to permit only single family attached or apartment units within Phase 2 in order to achieve a higher density in the areas designated as "high density residential" by the Comprehensive Plan. The revised proffer statement also allows for TDR's to be utilized for any dwelling unit located on the Property, but single family dwelling units would still be prohibited within Phase 2. 4) Comment: Proffer 5.1. The need for the statement 'At the applicant's sole discretion, any dwelling units constructed in Phase 2 that utilize the TDR Ordinance may be single family detached dwelling units" is unclear. Inclusion of the option to utilize TDR's for any of the 300 proposed units appears to be sufficient. Response: Proffer statement revised accordingly. 5) Comment: Development Impact Model. The proffer exempts 25 single family dwelling units form the monetary contribution outlined in the Development Impact Model. The impact statement shows that this is due to the existing RP zoning on the 6 acre portion of the property. However, due to the restrictive covenant regarding access, this area is not developable with the by -right density unless the RA zoned portion of the property is rezoned with this application. Therefore, the impact on County facilities for all residential units proposed with this development should be addressed with this rezoning. Response: While the existing restrictive covenant precludes access from Westwood Drive to the approximate 6 acre area currently zoned RP, access to that area could still be provided by a road extension from either the north (via Madison Village and across the RA zoned portions of the site) or the south (via existing area approved for Freedom Manor). The units that could be built in this existing, zoned area of the site are not an impact generated by the proposed rezoning. Accordingly, the exemption of the last 25 single family dwelling units from monetary proffers remains in the revised proffer. 6) Comment: Trail Location. The 10' trail is shown along the property lines on the GDP and in the proffer. Within the Madison Village development the trail runs along the roadway, therefore if developed as proposed someone coming from Madison Village network would transition away from the main roadway and onto a private trail within the open space and then to Papermill Road. The trail should go along the main road within the development and include a trail throught he area that connects to Route 522. Response: The revised proffer provides for bike lanes along the north/south connector road, as requested. In addition, a 10' trail is provided along the Papermill Road frontage and the southern property boundary. Freedom Manor September 8, 2015 Page 3 7) Comment: Shenandoah Memorial Park Buffer. The proffer statement from 2005 contained a proffer for a 50' distance buffer with landscaping and a 6' iron type fence along the cemetery boundary. The new proffer statement eliminates all of these commitments. The new application should include some form of buffer landscaping and the installation of the fence. Response: The revised proffer statement provides for a single row of evergreen trees along the common property line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. The remaining boundaries of Shenandoah Memorial Park do not include any type of fencing, so proffered fencing should not be necessary. 8) Comment: Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. Response: Acknowledged. 9) Comment: Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshal, Frederick County Departement of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick - Winchester Health Department, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the Historic Resources Advisory Board, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. Response: Acknowledged. 10) Comment: Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000 base fee plus $100.00 per acre and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Response: Acknowledged. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (540) 667-2139. Sincerely, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. Patrick R. Sowers Senior Project Engineer cc: John Bishop, AICP PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres - RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres - RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres - RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres - RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised August 10, 2015. 1. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof; Unless—developed—€or--single—family--detaehe"wellings-undep-the Gounty�s—Transfer-of-Developrnent-Rights-Ordinanse,a-,prevfded-for-by--P- effer- 5A_.. r- Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 2 3 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 40-56 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, aeress-the P-reperty-frontage-:to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for.a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Aeeees-t-o t e-Proper-ty-frore-P-apeFmill-Read-shatl-be-I noted toingle-entrance in-the-general-IOGation-depicted-en-the-GDP-.Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papein the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the site entranceroundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a certi€ieate-of-ecoupancybuilding permit for the 1501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: • The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. • The Applicant shall design and construct a southbeund-left-tern-lane-for P-apermill-Road-at-the-site-entrance-on-P-apermill Read public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. 2.4 con etructed-on-the-Property-the-Applioan"hat 1-design-and-seristruet-a-public roadway-te-provide-an-interparcel-eenneetion4e-the-western Pfeperty-limits-in-the general-loeation-depicted-on-the-GDP-. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a certificate ef-eeeupancybuilding permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' hiker/biker trail across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access Page 2 of 4 Proffer Statement Freedom Manor easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. 3.2 Pr-ior-to--issuance-ef-a-certificate-Of-GGeupa► Gy4or- #e-1-50"'-dwel✓ieg-+ nit,-4-e Applicant-shall-cer+struGt-a-1-0 hiker/bilEer-trafa-�d+ng-frem-?aperrn+l4R d-te the-norther-n-Prepert-y---boundary-at-the-GORRectieR-peiet ef-t#e-ReFth/seuth GenneGtor--r-ead-with-the-adjaceet-Madisefl-V-41age-pmj-eGt in the geRer-a"oGatioR depicted-en-the-GDP.The design and construction of the north/south connector road as depicted on the GDP shall include bike lanes. 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 4.1 For the first 75 single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $554547 $44-2406 $44-8412 General Government $431,373 $331,050 $331,050 Libra $456442 $3-79338 $37-9338 Parks and Recreation $1-,74-21,819 $4,3321,391 $4,3321,391 School Construction $1-6;74 15,499 $44-,28 -10,495 $40;53510,689 TOTAL $1-9-,58319,680 $43;43-713,680 1 $42 69713 880 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of a -the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. A"he-AppAGant's-sole disGrefieri—an--dwelling-units-sonstrusted-ire-P-has,�hat-ut iz the—TDR 9r4nanoe-+may-be--single-family-detached-dwell+ng-u4:,,4-s N-No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitments-exGlud+ng-t4e4m4atien-ef-single-fa► lity detached-dwelling-s-within-Phase-2, shall remain applicable to such dwelling units. Page 3 of 4 Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities -not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501" dwelling unit constructed on the Property the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Respectfully submitted, Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC IN Date: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, by My commission expires Notary Public Page 4 of 4 .. PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # Residential Performance (RP) and Rural Areas (RA) to Residential Performance (RP) PROPERTY: 47.5415 acre +/- total (the "Property") comprised of the following; Tax Map Parcel 64-A-23 (26.8733 Acres — RP to RP) Tax Map Parcel 64-A-19 (2.2021 Acres — RP to RP) Portion of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (4.6065 Acres — RP to RP) Remainder of Tax Map Parcel 64-A-20 (13.8596 Acres — RA to RP) RECORD OWNER: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC PROJECT NAME: Freedom Manor ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: December 30, 2014 REVISION DATE(S): September 4, 2015 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan" or "GDP" shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Freedom Manor" dated November 3, 2014 and revised August 10, 2015. Site Development 1.1 Development of the Property shall not exceed a total of 300 dwelling units developed in two phases. Phase 1 shall include a maximum of 100 single family detached dwelling units within the area depicted as Phase 1 by the GDP. Phase 2, as depicted by the GDP, shall consist of the remaining 200 dwelling units which may be single family attached units, apartment units, or any combination thereof. 1.2 The Property shall be developed in general conformance with the Generalized Development Plan, subject to minor modifications to accommodate final engineering. Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 2. Transportation 2.1 Prior to issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any dwelling constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall dedicate right of way across the Papermill Road frontage of the Property in order to provide for a minimum of 56 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road, to provide for both future road improvements and a hiker/biker trail within the right of way. In the event that the Applicant chooses to locate the hiker/biker trail as proffered across the Papermill Road frontage within a public access easement, the right of way dedication may be reduced to provide for a minimum of 48 feet of right of way, as measured from the centerline of Papermill Road. 2.2 Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the initial dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a single lane roundabout to access the Property from Papein the general location and configuration depicted on the GDP. Design of the roundabout shall be subject to VDOT review and approval. No additional site entrances shall be permitted along Papermill Road. 2.3 The Applicant shall complete the following transportation improvements, subject to VDOT approval, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 1501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property: • The Applicant shall design and construct the north/south connector road as a public roadway from the Property entrance at Papermill Road to the northern Property limits to connect with the planned interparcel connector for the adjoining Madison Village project in the general location depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall design and construct a public roadway to provide an interparcel connection to the western Property limits in the general location depicted on the GDP. Pedestrian/Biker Improvements 3.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 50'h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a 10' hiker/biker trail across the Property frontage on Papermill Road and across the southern Property boundary in the general location depicted on the GDP. Public access easements shall be provided for these trails if not constructed within public right of way. 3.2 The design and construction of the north/south connector road, as depicted on the GDP, shall include bike lanes. Page 2 of,l Proffer Statement Freedom Manor 4. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 4.1 For the first 75 single family detached dwelling units and for any single family attached or apartment dwelling units constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall contribute the following amounts to Frederick County for the purposes identified in following Table A. Said contribution shall be made prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for each of the subject dwelling units. Table A. Monetary Contributions Purpose Single Family Detached Units Single Family Attached Units Apartment Units Fire and Rescue $547 $406 $412 General Government $1,373 $1,050 $1,050 Library $442 $338 $338 Parks and Recreation $1,819 $1,391 $1,391 School Construction 1 $15,499 $10,495 $10,689 TOTAL $19,680 $133680 $13,880 5. Option for use of Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance 5.1 In lieu of the per unit monetary contribution as provided for by Proffer 4.1, the Applicant may utilize the Frederick County Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program pursuant to Section 165-301 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (the "TDR Ordinance") to provide for development of any/all of the proposed 300 dwelling units for the subject Property. No monetary proffer shall be required for any dwelling unit constructed utilizing the TDR Ordinance, but all remaining proffered commitmentsshall remain applicable to such dwelling units. 6. Creation of and Initial funding for Property Owners Association 6.1 Development of the Property shall include creation of a Property Owners Association (POA) which shall be responsible for ownership and maintenance of any common areas and stormwater management facilities not dedicated to a public entity as well as solid waste collection and disposal. In addition, the POA shall be subject to other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations. 6.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund in the amount of $5,000.00 in order to facilitate the POA operations. The funds shall be transferred to the POA at such time that control of the POA is transferred to the third party property owners. 7. Landscape Buffer 7.1 Prior to issuance of a building permit for the 501h dwelling unit constructed on the Property, the Applicant shall install a single row of evergreens, a minimum of 4 feet tall at time of planting and spaced a maximum of 10 feet on center, along the common boundary line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE Pagc 3 ord N Proffer Statement Freedom Manor Respectfully submitted, Shen -Valley Land Holdings, LLC Date: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: by The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2015, My commission expires Notary Public Pagc =1 or4 ad -and . Trail efi n to i 6 A-145 Longcroit Rd' - _ - Road and Bike Lane -_- Connection to �� - Bentley AwetlUe Madison Village _ ------ I— �- </” - - Proposed Roundabout SUBJECT PROPERTY i J� 2 N Proposed Bike Lane' Westl►ood �v na6t�!p � nae North/South �10, 'mail i Connector Road \ 40 Proposed Proposed 10' 'bail _ Evergreen �✓ Screen __00 A 1 ` Madison Village E Vine e 0909 .� .O Proposed " O A R/11 Dedication co Shenandoah Memorial Park J y Existing Signal -�- FREEDOM MANOR PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. \ Generalized Development Plon 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 O Cb O Z. �-h a VOICE: 540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDER/CK COUNIY, v/RG/NG9 Pennoni PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING LUGINccas August 31, 2015 Mr. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 RE: Freedom Manor Responses to VDOT comments for Traffic Impact Analysis Dated October 28, 2014 Pennoni # DHOL1404 Dear Mr. Smith: Pennoni has revised the TIA for the subject site, Freedom Manor. The revisions reflect VDOT's correspondence with comments dated February 27, 2014. This letter is a formal response to the items contained in the VDOT comments to review the policy and technical elements associated with this resubmission. VDOT comments are shown in bold and Pennoni's responses are shown in italic for each of the comments: VDOT COMMENTS: The report does not include a concept plan of the proposed development of 1. the property. Please provide a scaled plan within the report that identifies the proposed layout of the site. The GDP is included as Figure 2A in lieu of a concept plan since the site is only in the rezoning phase. This was discussed and accepted with VDOT at the May 26 Engineer's Meeting in Edinburg. The background information / introduction section of the report should be 2. expanded to include the comprehensive plan land use designation for the property. The comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is shown in Figure 4A with the area north of Pa ermill Road planned in the "Eastern Frederick 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 • Herndon, VA 20171 • Ph: 703-449-6700 • Fx: 703-449-6714 www.pennoni.com August 31, 2015 Page 2 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis County Long -Term Land Use Plan" as residential to the south and high density residential to the north. Adjacent to the site, the plan shows residential to the east and high density residential to the northwest. On Page 8 of the report, the heading Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & 3 Papermill Drive is mislabeled. This should be Route 522 and Justes Drive. Corrected. Page 9 of the revised report. The report analysis and associated rezoning proffers assume that the Madison Village development will be fully constructed by 2026 (prior to the issuance of the 150th dwelling unit per the proffers). What happens if this is not the case? VDOT recommends that the proffers should be revised to limit development of the property to Phase 1 only (100 single family 4. detached dwellings); until such time that the road improvements through the Madison Village development are complete. Unless an alternative site layout can be developed to provide an optional secondary access point (with analysis), a development restriction in the proffers is the only method of ensuring the necessary infrastructure is in place to support the development. With the suggested alternative roundabout at Papermill Road, the capacity is increased for site access. With the connection to Madison Village, we have assumed a trip distribution between the two projects that would send more trips through Freedom Manor. Accordingly, the 2026 build -out is actually a conservative estimate for the Papermill entrance. In the event that Madison Village is unable to make the connection allowing for the secondary access, the Papermill Road trips generated by Freedom Manor will be less than the counts used for the 2026 build out condition that assumes a connection with Madison Village. In addition, it is important to note that Madison Village was recently approved for up to 640 dwelling units on a single site entrance. No phasing limitations were placed on development of Madison Village that triggered a requirement for a secondary site entrance. The VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1) requires SIDRA to be used in the analysis of all roundabouts. The report only 5. includes Synchro analysis of the roundabout in the Madison Village development. Please update the report to provide the appropriate analysis for the roundabout. A separate roundabout analysis with SIDRA is provided for the revised site entrance. However, Pennoni noted in previous meetings that Synchro analysis for the roundabout within Madison Village should suffice since the Madison Village TIS (Painter Lewis PLC, June 27, 2013) provided Synchro analysis as well for the off -site location as part of their land entitlement approvals. Furthermore, the volumes through the roundabout are minimal at less than 10,000 v d on the legs August 31, 2015 Page 3 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis and there are no operational issues with all analysis years, as both background and total show overall LOS "A" and approach LOS "B" or better for both peak hours. There are some discrepancies throughout the report over what is actually being recommended for the right turn movement into the site entrance on Papermill Road. The 4th paragraph on Page 6 of the report indicates that a left turn lane and right turn taper are recommended with Phase 2. However, the Final Assessment on Page 8 states that separate left and right turn lanes will be provided at the site entrance on Papermill Road in the long-term. 6 Please clarify the recommendation and make it consistent throughout the report. Our analysis shows that due to the traffic volumes on Papermill Road in the 2020 PM peak hour, the left turn lane into the subdivision will be warranted with the first dwelling unit of the development. Therefore, VDOT recommends the construction of the full turn lanes on Papermill Road be installed prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling unit of Phase I. A left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, and therefore, Pennoni has engaged several iterations of alternatives including reviewing minimum left turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication would be available. As noted in previous meetings, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) would not support partial dedications or easements to allow the widening to be shared between the property owners, at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even an option with a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised T/A, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as a T intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. Route 522 is indicated as having a 45 mph posted speed limit within the project vicinity in the report and Synchro models. However, there is a 55 mph sign north of the site, heading south on Route 522. There does not 7. appear to be another speed limit sign prior to passing the intersection with Papermill Road (there is a 40 mph school zone within this stretch of Route 522). Please verify the posted speed limit and adjust the report and Synchro models accordingly. Verified and revised to 55 mph in the report and Synchro models. August 31, 2015 Page 4 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis The proffers indicate that 40' of right -or -way (20' additional) from the existing centerline will be dedicated across the property frontage to accommodate future widening of Papermill Road. This distance will not accommodate the Urban, 4-lane divided road section as planned in the 8. Frederick County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. A minimum of 48' from the center line is required. This is assuming the 10' multi -use trail is located off right-of-way in public easement. Along the property frontage south of the proposed entrance, 60' from the centerline will be necessary to also accommodate the right turn lane into the development. The proffers have been revised to provide for a minimum of 56' of right of way as measured from the existing centerline of Papermill Road. If additional right of way is not required for the multi -use trail at time of final site design, then a public easement will be provided for use of the trail and the R-O-W will be reduced. The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities section of the report on Page 13 should be updated to state that Papermill Road is designated for a 9. potential future bicycle facility per the Winchester, Frederick County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. It should also state that a 10' multi -use trail is proffered across the property's Papermill Road frontage. Updated in Page 17 of the revised TIA. The report states that the VETTRA counts for Evandale Elementary from 10. 2005 are provided in Appendix B, but the counts do not appear to be included. Included in the revised TIA. The report indicates that all turn lane storage lengths include half of the taper distance. Please update all tables to provide storage lengths that only 11. include the full width storage lane and verify that there are no queuing issues as a result. Revised. The half taper has been removed from the tables to show only the full width storage lane lengths in the tables. Besides removing the half taper distance, all the existing storage lengths have been reviewed and, if necessary updated, for a more accurate analysis. The report does not include a proposed length for the recommended extension of the eastbound Papermill right turn lane onto Route 522. Please provide. Also, based on the recommendations it is not clear who will be 12 responsible for the recommended improvements at the Papermill Road I Route 522 intersection (these improvements are not proffered). Please clarify. August 31, 2015 Page 5 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Synchro analysis with a separate eastbound right turn lane, optimized network cycle lengths, offsets, and an eastbound right turn overlap phase, shows that 325 ft of storage would allow for sufficient storage and acceptable LOS D" for the eastbound approach under all future conditions. With site impacts at the intersection at less than 6 percent of the future traffic, as shown on Table 9A, the provision of a new roundabout on Papermill Road, and the off -site improvements required to mitigate background conditions, the requirement to construct as part of the Freedom Manor rezoning is not justified. The recommended right turn lane on Papermill Road into the development is 13. currently not included in the proffers. Please advise. Same response as response to comment #6. Provide an additional figure in the report that identifies the recommended 14. improvements. Added as Figure 3B in the revised TIA. 15. Preliminary cost estimates for the recommended improvements are not provided in the report. Included under the "Background Information" Section (3) as a subheading (c) on page 16 of the revised TIA: For planning budget purposes using the VDOT 2009 Planning and Mobility estimates (inflated at 3 percent annually to 2018), the proposed and suggested improvements could be budgeted as noted: - Roundabout construction at site entrance, estimated at $1,300,000 plus $200, 000 for realigning approximately 180 ft of the southbound Papermill Road approach to the roundabout. - $1,014,500 for the main on -site roadway as a two-lane local street connection from Papermill Road to the interparcel connection to Madison Village. Additional off -site improvements suggested to improve existing, background, and total operations: - Extend eastbound Papermill Road right turn lane from 35 ft to 325 ft with 100 ft taper, including utility and R-O-W contingencies at 25% percent of the lane cost. This would equate to $925, 000. - Modification of the existing traffic signal operations at Route 522 & Papermill Road to add an eastbound right turn overlap phase, estimated at $5,000 for a 5- section signal head on eastbound approach, related rewiring, and assuming no structural upgrades of the northeast quadrant traffic signal pole. August 31, 2015 Page 6 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis - Restriping of the northbound left turn lane between Papermill Road and Justes Drive to increase left turn storage, estimated at $7, 000. Westwood Drive, serving the adjacent residential development to the east of the site, was planned for a future connection to the subject property. 16. Therefore, VDOT recommends that Freedom Manor should propose this connection between the two developments. Connection with Westwood Drive is not possible due to a restrictive covenant recorded in 2005 (Instrument #050023984) by the previous property owner. With the restrictive covenant in place, Freedom Manor is unable to provide a connection between the proposed development and the existing street. Verify that the Peak Hour Factors and Heavy Vehicle percentages entered in the existing year Synchro models match the traffic counts. There appears to 17. be some discrepancies. Also verify that the existing year Heavy Vehicle percentages are consistently carried through all future year Synchro models. Revised. The PHF and HV% discrepancies in the existing year Synchro models have been corrected and the existing HV%'s have been carried through all future year Synchro models. The VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1) requires 18. that a Peak Hour Factor of 0.92 be utilized for all movement in all future analysis. Please update all future year Synchro models accordingly. Revised. A PHF of 0.92 has now been utilized for all movements in all future analysis except when the existing PHF for a given approach was higher; in which case, the higher PHF was utilized instead, as recommended on page 46 of the VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1). None of the future year Synchro models include the improvements as recommended in the report (except the right turn overlap signal adjustment at the Papermill Road and Route 522 intersection). Please update the 2020 19. and 2026 models to include the Papermill Road eastbound right turn lane extension and update the 2026 models to include the left and right turn lanes on Papermill Road into the development. Synchro files with a 325 ft eastbound right turn lane (based on results of the revised capacity analyses) are included as alternatives with the submission of this revised TIA (file names with "2-Lane EB Analysis'). As noted earlier, a roundabout is suggested for the development entrance intersection with Papermill Road in the revised TIA, negating the need for left and ri ht turn lanes. The revised TIA contains SIDRA analysis for the proposed August 31, 2015 Page 7 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis roundabout. The VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1) requires that signal timings be optimized in all future year analysis. The future year 20 Synchro models are utilizing existing signal timings at the Route 522 / Papermill Road and Route 522 / Justes Drive intersections. Please revise all future year models to coordinate all signals and then optimize the network cycle length. Updated. Signal timings for all future year traffic signals have been optimized and coordinated with each other (including the proposed signal at future Madison Village entrance on Route 522). The report indicates that there are no queuing issues in any of the Synchro models. However, simulations of the future year 2020 improved and 2026 improved models identify significant queuing delays at the eastbound 21. approach at the Papermill Road / Route 522 intersection. The queue is a result of not modeling the recommended right turn lane extension. Provide a recommended extension length for the right turn lane and update the models accordingly. As noted in the response to comment #19, Synchro files with a 325 ft eastbound right turn lane (based on results of the revised capacity analyses) are included as alternatives with the submission of this revised TIA (file names with "2-Lane EB Analysis'), and show that the additional storage would be sufficient for queueing and result in acceptable LOS "D" for all future conditions, without the site. The turn lane is not recommended for construction with the subject site, since the deficiencies are associated with existing traffic and growth, so the improvement is shown as an alternative to achieve desirable LOS. Please review and advise if acceptable for approval. The CD's provided to VDOT include a PDF of the report and the Synchro and SIDRA analysis files. As always, we thank you in advance for your coordination on this project. Please feel free to contact me at (703) 840-4830 with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Pennoni Associates, Inc. Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Associate Vice President August 31, 2015 Page 8 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Enclosures: cc: VAPROJECTS\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\TIA\DHOL1404_TIA Comments Responses_2015 08.docx Il u I PAPERMILL RD FREEDOM MANOR ENTRANCE ROUNDABOUTJUSTIFICATION � Freedom Manor Rezoning ' FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA u Papermill Road/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification In association with the Freedom Manor Rezoning Located in Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Dave Holliday Construction 420 W. Jubal Early Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 667-2120 Prepared by: Pennoni Associates Inc Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architecls 117 East Piccadilly St Pennom Winchester, Virginia 22601 T 540.667.2139 • F 540.665.0493 August 12, 2015 `�O� Sri ",ENNEDY5 DOUGL��S R. J cl .fl Lic. into. 21450 9-1-15� TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................4 A) PURPOSE OF REPORT AND STUDY OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................4 A) BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT FACILITIES..............................................................................................................7 F) ACCESS MANAGEMENT SPACING..............................................................................................................................13 G) PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN......................................................................................................................................13 3. DESIGN ELEMENTS........................................................................................................................................14 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.......................................................................................................................16 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH..................................................................................................................................................16 B) SITE TRAFFIC.........................................................................................................................................................16 C) FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT................................................................................19 D) SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...........................................................................................................................19 E) LONG-TERM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS............................................................................................................................21 5. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS......................................................................................................................... 24 6. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................................................................27 Contact Information The analysis was prepared by Pennoni: Mr. Ronald A. Mislowsky, PE Mr. Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Mr. Patrick Sowers Mr. James R. Gray, PE Mr. Wan Chong, E.I.T. Mr. Graham Young, E.I.T. Pennoni 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667-2139 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 Herndon, Virginia 20171 (703) 449-6700 V:\PROJECTS\DHOL\l404-Freedom Manor\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\Pcnnoni_Freedoni Manor —Paper Mill Roundabout JustiGcation_201509.doc ' LIST OF FIGURES E:xhibil A: Freedom, fldmuor C n,,pl Roundabml.......................................................................................................................................... 3 ' I=figure 1: Sile Location................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 !=figure 2: Freedom AlanorAccess Plan.......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Exhibit B: Eastern Frederick Count' Long Term Land Use Plan.............................................................................................................. 10 Exhibit C: Eastern Frederick Couno, Long Tern, Land Use Plan.............................................................................................................. 11 ExhibitD: Eastern Frederick Couno, Road Plan........................................................................................................................................ 12 ' Exhibil E: Eastern Frederick Conn, Road Plan Cross-Sections................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 5: Paperm,ill Road Traffic L'obrnes wilh Freedom Manor Roumdaboul............................................................................................. 18 Figure 6: Short -Term Freedom, Manor Leine Co fguralion.......................................................................................................................... 19 ' Figure 6A: Short -Term, 2020 AM Conditions.- LOS Delay and Degree of Saluralion ............................................................................... 20 Figure 6B: Shor7-Tern, 2020 PAI Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saluration................................................................................. 21 Figure 7A: Long -Term 2026 AAI Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Satnralion............................................................................... 23 I Figure 7B: Long -Tern, 2026 PAI Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saluration................................................................................. 24 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: PROPOSED TRAPFTC DESIGN CI IARACTLRISTICS............................................................................................................... 4 TABLE 2: PAPERMiu. ROAD ROUNDABOUT PROPOSED ACCESS SPACING................................................................................... 13 TABI-E 3: SITE TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................................................................ 17 TABLE 4: LONG -TERN[ SINGLE LANE ROUNDABOUT CAPACITY CI IECK..................................................................................... 22 TABLE 5A: 2026 PAPL'I miu. RD/FREEDOM MANOR SIGNAL DAILY WARRAN'I......................................................................... 25 TABLE 513: 2026 PAPERMTI.I. RD/FREEDOM ,MANOR SIGNAL PEAK HOUR WARRAN'T............................................................. 26 TABLE 6A: Si-Ion-1'EILm PAPERAIILI. RD/FREEDOM 1/IANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS ....................................... 28 ' TABLE 613: LONG ,rER\I PAPERMII.1. RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUTLOS COMPARISONS ........................................ 28 APPENDICIES ' APPENDIX A: PROPERTY OWNER COORDINATION APPENDIX B: AASIDRA WORKSHEETS I Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pennoni Associates, Inc. has prepared this roundabout justification to provide information for the ' review and approval of a roundabout at the proposed Papermill Road (VA Route 644) intersection in Frederick County, Virginia east of the I-81 Corridor. The proposed roundabout is suggested as an alternative to the typical turn lane improvements associated with new development in order to ' provide initial access to the site with the proposed rezoning of approximately 47.5 acres. This analysis is intended to examine the local and through traffic characteristics of the proposed ' facility to support the concept design elements associated with the proposed land use changes to accommodate 300 residential dwelling units at the site build -out, with access to Papennill Road and to a site connection north to the proposed Madison Village Community, with access to U.S. ' Route 522. The site was zoned for 70 single-family detached residential units in 2004 for the southern portion of the property (approximately 26.2 acres) with access to Papennill Road. The original traffic study methodology was reviewed with VDOT Staunton District staff, and was ' oriented to update future conditions to support the short-term and long-term traffic conditions with the revised land use activities. The traffic study, "Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor," dated October 28, 2014 updated traffic conditions for short-term access with 100 single- family detached residential units and 200 apartment/townhouse residential units for the long-term. Based on the analysis, VDOT requested a separate southbound left turn lane into the site for the initial single-family detached activities. Based on the VDOT design criteria for Papermill Road, the implementation of the left turn lane would require transitions and off -site R-O-W which were not available. After reviewing constraints with VDOT and pursuing off -site R-O-W from the ' adjacent property owners (See Appendix A), the Applicant revisited the existing geometry constraints and has pursued a design concept for a 3-legged roundabout off -set to allow initial access to the property from Papermill Road. The access concept is shown in Exhibit A for a 140 ' ft. diameter roundabout. The offset is designed with 40 mph approach curves entering the roundabout to further reduce speeds, in conjunction with the splitter islands, at the new access to the desirable 18-25 mph entering the roundabout. The concept plan satisfies single lane ' conditions without separate lanes for the site build -out. For the long-term scenario, the roundabout works at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better during the peak hours. The Frederick County Transportation Plan envisions Papermill Road as a four lane divided major collector, so ' the proposed R-O-W is increased on -site to accommodate the ultimate County R-O-W; however since the operations with the Freedom Manor site are acceptable with the single -lane roundabout as shifted, the implementation of the County's ultimate 4 lane corridor will require future off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road. That scenario is not part of the subject roundabout justification. The Frederick County 2030 Comprehensive Policy Plan Map — excerpted in Exhibit B — shows ' the general vicinity for the corridor between I-81 and Route 522 with the 4 lane major collector, consistent within the VDOT Functional Plan and the regional road plan for Frederick County (see Exhibits C through E). ' DHOL1404 Page 1 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1 Traffic volumes were used from the 2014 study and evaluated using the aaSIDRA roundabout capacity software. Relevant traffic and density tables are excerpted from the October 2014 study ' to support the proposed concept. For the capacity analysis, the roundabout operations were reviewed for both short-term and long-term scenarios. A forth leg to the south was not included since the adjacent property owner representative did not want to sell R-O-W to accommodate road ' improvements as noted in the Appendix. The proposed alternative can be refined with the final signing and pavement marking plans for implementation within the proposed geometries. Pennoni recommends that the final configuration of the roundabout associated with the rezoning to allow: ' • Off -set of Papermill Road to allow a single lane roundabout with a 140 diameter • One approach lane entering the roundabout from Freedom Manor • Pedestrian and bike accessing a 10 ft. multi -use trail east of the existing road. • Acceptable LOS for a single -lane roundabout at LOS `C' for the long-term forecasts. The concept plan allows improvements to the existing two-lane section of Papermill Road to accommodate improved access into the Freedom Manor property. The roundabout is an improved alternative to the approved rezoning to allow for turns on southbound Papermill Road, and allow egress from the side street, since signalization is not anticipated to be warranted. L r Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 2 11 m m m r m m m � � m� A" PR avatar of � ►ermi ads West e- Pennonf, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS - T 4 3 C 9 F It 200' PROPOSED RIGHT OF RAY"; - e,u tt - too- ' 1 150, sPW tsLcla) I Papermill R".j� VGRlGtrr OY -AY FREEDOM MANOR S CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT JULY 2015 1 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1 Exhibit A: Freedom Manor Concept Roundabout i 1 ! i 1 i ! 1 1 1 1 1 DHOL1404 Page 3 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 � I 2. INTRODUCTION a) Purpose of Report and Study Objective This analysis summarizes transportation planning elements of a proposed roundabout, in order to provide VDOT with the design justification to support the public improvements. This justification and plan attachments are intended to respond to initial VDOT comments, as well as provide a general summary of the design to satisfy the criteria in the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F. The study analyzes the following scenarios: • Short -Term Site Access (2020) Conditions • Long Term Build -out plus Six Year (2026) conditions. The October 2014 Traffic Study reviewed the existing, No -Build scenarios, and total conditions with a conventional intersection at Papermill Road and Route 522 impacts. The TIA was updated in July 2015 for the revised roundabout concept. The site location is shown in Figure 1 and the localized access plan for Freedom Manor is included in Figure 2. The localized design features of Papermill Road at the roundabout are summarized in Table 1: TABLE 1: PROPOSED TRAFFIC DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS Papermill Road (VA Route 644) Frederick County, VA Design Classification: VDOT GS-7 Urban Major Collector Road ADT (2014) 8,810 Projected ADT (2020) 12,250 Projected ADT (2026) 12,840 DHV (2026) 1233 D (%) 59% EB (PM) T (%) 2% HV V (MPH) 50 Design Speed (45 Posted Speed Limit) 25 MPH roundabout with 40 MPH approach Curves Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 4 � I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � C-. 66� t n O �, rb b� Q161, i T61 f SO 6611 fQnl ]T 611 W1ncheste r� 11 �.. (6DST ]T, STT 628' SITE 63' ` �5 Stephens City �i f5o. bsa Middletown 1,62 Sky Meadows State Park n:i(a sourcc: q.(of ;;ic ,iap, FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 1 \D \fif 11 T 11 "111 It \ 1 It )\ SITE LOCATION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 'N Figure 2: Freedom Manor Access Plan r � y Madison Longcloit Rd Village I 17T Road and Trail Connection to Madison Village — Bentley Avenla� Road and Trail 0 Connection to / �+ TM 63-A-145 `9 so as ^: DaBtone ' Westwood Drive brivo ' �y North/South Proposed Connector Road 10• Trad or Bike Lane Proposed Vine ne Lane - Roundabout y � ♦ 10' 4Y•ai1 00 Proposed A R/1I Dedication Gf co Shenandoah a o Memorial Park SUBJECT PROPERTY "i o• c� FREEDOM MANOR lit o i Generalized Development Plan O � � FREVERICK COUMY• ORGIN14 Existing Signal PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E. Picadill St. VYnchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 The localized study area is in the Shawnee Magisterial District of Frederick County. The County covers an area of approximately 416 square miles and has a population estimated at 78,305 (2010 Census). A description of the study area roadways in the vicinity of the site is provided below: Papermill Road (Route 644): is an approximately 1.5 mile roadway that starts within the City of Winchester and continues in a southeasterly direction ending at Route 522. It is 2-lane undivided and considered an urban minor collector by VDOT. Papermill Road carried an ADT of 7,600 vehicles in 2013 according to VDOT estimates. The speed limit in the study area is 45 mph. Existing traffic conditions in the Study area are shown in Figure 3. a) Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit facilities Sidewalks are not located along Papennill Road within the study area. A proposed shared use path is suggested along the site frontage with the rezoning with the new roadway. b) Existing Land Use Figure 4 from the Traffic Study shows the existing land use activities adjacent to Papermill Road. The site is undeveloped north of Route 644. To the south, the area across from the site is in agricultural use. To the southeast of the site, the Shenandoah Memorial Park is located at the Papermill Road curve west of Evendale Lane and extends east to US Route 522, with driveways to Papermill Road and Route 522. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 7 11 0 4- I,Z""' Villaee 8,810 Proposed roundabout location M LEGEND © STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC:AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAYADT �2 1 N Approximate Site Boundary 0 y� a. O SITE J ° U. r` I 16,430 I SITE i - - -----------� J'apermill (toad (Route 644 10 17,770 C H L (DCq _ T W) N � O ✓ I l LT. kn in X � G N Papermill Road v ci (Route 644) t . 62 (121) 130 (372)MU Justes Drive O O � � ONi '_ % Rr 118 (70) 50 (41) Drive tJustes C1. N ■ N N T O r M 1Q n a � 0 u.. FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 3 WUNDABOUTJUSTMICATION TRAFFIC VOLUMES DIIOLl404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA l"gl"I '015 L tit . f 'All s At. Approximate Site r\� r 4 Boundary 4 �. Yr;tt►u nod (Route 644) Pennon ,Vkm Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 201S c) Future Land Use Changes Exhibit B shows the proposed Comprehensive Plan for the immediate vicinity adjacent to the Freedom Manor site. The Plan anticipates that the site be developed as residential, (yellow) and high density residential (crosshatch green -brown) with transition to employment uses (green crosshatch) adjacent to the I-81 corridor west. Land south of Papermill Road is proposed as park area. 1 Exhibit B: Eastern Frederick Counts• Long Term Land Use Plan Source: Frederick County, Amended June 13, 2012 d) Transportation Plan L-9 Nangc L—d Ux Plan v r r.ww—r wo �� � rye •mow. ly.lr..w a'.._�...J �. �. ... w O r.r rolU 1a1110I.— ft" Nan Map W 400row�: l,dr imh,'otl tm ".d: ).— 1 Wl, '011 Exhibit C is provided to show the County's existing road Functional Plan uses in the Eastern Plan area. Papermill Road is a major collector. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 10 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification 441ar4 August 12, 2015 � h Existing Conditions Street Functional • Classifications G. wPlar. Aln.l l.11 1,q, Ar Ak, ,f O`PP.Iulrn ( .Aloct'x i •��Urban Development Area h 45Sewer and Water Service Area RuralCommurntyCenter v 5- A J Exhibit C: Eastern Frederick Counn- Long Term Land Use Plu Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 e) Future Roadway Changes •030 Gol.greMnsrvs POI.cy %an Map J44-ml: July tale. ]Oil R T The street through Freedom Manor is proposed as a local street. The County transportation plan envisions a parallel corridor —Warrior Drive Extended to be constructed west of the site to provide through access east of I-81 to the future Tevis street extension corridor. The County Plan also envisions the existing curve of Papermill Road to the south of Freedom Manor (adjacent to the Shenandoah Memorial Park Cemetery) to be realigned to the south to opposite the Justes Drive signal. However, these roadway changes are not funded and are not included in the roundabout justification. The Eastern Area Road Plan is shown in Exhibit D with the cross - sections summarized in Exhibit E. Papermill Road is envisioned as U413 section in the study area as an improved major collector. DHOL1404 Page 11 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 \/ I : t 4 i ( i v � 00 �s • J, • Exhibit D: Eastern Frederick Counts• Road Plan Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 \ _ 522 Exhibit E: Eastern Frederick Count► Road Plan Cross -Sections Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 DHOL1404 Pennoni Eastern Road Plan - Ian 2011 New Major arterial ^� Improved Major Arterial +• New Minor Artenal Improved Minor Arterial 4P New Major Collector Improved Major Collector New Minor Collector Improved Minor Collector `J Ramp - Trails suture ;it 37 BvpaSS �I )rban Development Area Sewer and water Service Area ,.) R u raicommunrtvc enter T Eastern Road Plan Cross Sections **%o R4U • P%.o 112 0'%.0 1140 �V Vh(i Future Rt 37 Bypass • *Urban Development Area Sewer and water Service Area Ruralcommunitycenter 'nW i Pohl' "�+:, -► '-Y. Appmvpl h lv y �O 5 1 ; Miir�s Page 12 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 11 0 Access Management Spacing The proposed access plan would satisfy the VDOT access management guidelines for a Collector Road, as classified by VDOT Functional Classification with a 35-45 MPH speed limit. See Table 2 for dimensions, consistent with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F criteria. TABLE 2: PAPERMILL ROAD ROUNDABOUT PROPOSED ACCESS SPACING DirectionStreet .. • ' Papermill Road West — 665 To Harrison Lane. Approximately 1,700 ft to Caldwell Lane east of the I-81 overpass). South —1,250 To driveway to 3790 Papermill Rd (Parcel 26) and app. 2,500 ft to Evandale Lane. VDOT Access Management Road Design Manual Appendix F Table 2-2 Criteria Roundabout Spacing 440 Collector (35 to 45 MPH Legal Speed Limit) (Signalized and Unsi nalized intersections Therefore, the subject roundabout would not require access waivers. To the west, the first signal is located in the City of Winchester west of Shawnee Drive at the East Tevis Street/South Pleasant Valley Road intersection, or over 1.7 miles from the subject roundabout. The future extension of Warrior Drive would not create access management spacing conflicts with the proposed roundabout. To the east, the adjacent signal is at the Route 522 intersection, or 4,150 ft. from the subject roundabout. g) Proposed Concept Plan The proposed roundabout design with roundabout 140 feet diameter is shown in Exhibit A, based on the design concepts developed with the TORUS roundabout software, which develops designs to accommodate heavy vehicle turns and general pavement edges. For the subject site, Pennoni added R-O-W based on County and VDOT requirements for Papermill Road. The extension into the Freedom Manor site is shown or road engineering only and will vary with design after the proposed splitter island. Due the desire to avoid off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road, the Route 644 centerlines were curved north as shown with a radius of 593 ft. (40 MPH design) to shift the roadway approaching the roundabout. The centerlines are off -set in the roundabout to reduce the entry speeds for through traffic. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 13 � I Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 ' 3. DESIGN ELEMENTS ' The design criteria and typical sections used for the roundabout concept design are outlined below for consideration by VDOT. ' The design speed proposed is at 50 MPH, with operations within the roundabout at approximately 25 MPH. Design Vehicle: The WB-67 Modified (wheel base of 41 feet) design for trucks and buses will be ' accommodated with the proposed roundabout. The modifications reflect the Virginia State law maximum length to approximate a WB-65 design vehicle. ' Approach Grades and Sight Distances: Papermill Road to/from Freedom Manor has a downgrade of approximately 1 percent from the north and south. ' Inscribed Outer Diameter of the Circulatory Roadway: The inscribed diameter for the proposed roundabout is at 140 feet. ' Apron Composition, Width, Slope and Curb Standard: The truck apron is proposed as concrete with the curb accommodating the VDOT CG-3 modified design. ' Circulatory Lane Width: Shown at 18 feet. Approach Lane Width, Deflection and Radii: Lane widths shown at 16-18 feet clear. The ' entering radii on Papermill Road are shown at approximately 100 feet. Departure Lane Width, Deflection and Radii: Lane widths shown at 16-18 feet clear. The ' departure lanes at Papermill Road in Exhibit A allow foi• a radius at the exit of 200 feet on Papermill Road and exiting Freedom Manor. ' Proposed Pedestrian Crossing Locations: The pedestrian crossings are shown approximately 20 feet back from the outer edge from the circulatory lane on the north side only to accommodate a 10 ft. shared use trail.. To the south, the edge of pavement is maintained without pedestrian ' access. Bicycle Lane Approach/Termination point:. No in road facilities are provided. ' Pavement Marking: The signing and marking plans will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines and be included with final design. ' Signing: The signing will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines and be included with final design. ' DHOL1404 Page 14 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 The pavement markings and signs will comply with the Federal Highway Administration 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the MOT Supplement to the MUTCD, and NCHRP Report 672 Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2nd Edition) 2010. Roadway Lighting- Roadway lighting is proposed with this project. Nearest Entrance Locations, and Nature of Property Use- To the west, the nearest street is at Harrison Street, a local street, or approximately 665 feet to the northwest, as measured from the outside edge of the inscribed circle to the centerline of the side street. To the east, the roundabout is approximately 2,410 feet from Evendale Lane. As noted, the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan envisions suburban and medium density residential north of Papermill Road and park uses to the south of Route 644. Employment uses are envisioned to the west adjacent to I-81. Present & Design Year Volumes — See Section 4 for the derivation and methodology on traffic forecasts. Figure 5 summarizes the design year forecast. aaSIDRA analysis LOS/Queues: See Section 4 for LOS and queues lengths. The LOS is acceptable as a single -lane roundabout. Proximity of roundabout to nearest signal: The U.S. Route 522 intersection is approximately 4,100 linear feet (10 from the proposed roundabout and is signalized. To the west, the nearest existing signal is in the City at South Pleasant Valley Road, approximately 1.7 ft. from the proposed roundabout. For the long-term conditions, if Warrior Drive is constructed as planned parallel to I-81, the spacing from the roundabout to the signal would exceed feet. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 15 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ' The October 2014 study addressed growth, background conditions and local development anticipated with the Freedom Manor site volumes for the Papermill Road and Route 522 ' corridors. The following sections outline relevant resources used for the roundabout capacity evaluation. a) Traffic Growth ' As part of the traffic analyses for the short and long-term conditions, the changes in traffic included other local development including the Madison Village site, Frederick County High School site, and a growth rate of 1.5 percent annually was assumed for the analysis of years of ' 2020 and 2026, in the traffic study. ' Traffic volumes were determined based on the western link volumes at the Route 522 signal with Papermill Road and extended as throughs past the subject site. The proposed Freedom Manor location does not have any adjacent public street or private entrances adjacent to the frontage, so ' the continuation of the through volumes should be accurate. The entrance to the cemetery and the Evandale Lane connection are the only major traffic generator sources between the site end Route 522. For 2020, Papermill Road is anticipated to accommodate 11,410 VPD, while the 2026 scenario estimated 12,310 VPD adjacent to the site. ' b) Site Traffic ' The proposed Freedom Manor site -generated trips were calculated using traffic generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 91i' Edition, 2012, as well as VDOT Staunton District requirements that require 80% of the trips for townhomes and apartments to be calculated using VDOT local rates. The project is planned to be built in two phases, with Phase 1 (2020) consisting of 100 single-family residential dwelling units and Phase 2 (2026) consisting of a mix of 200 townhomes and apartment residential dwelling units. Table 3 shows the weekday AM and PM peak hour and daily trips generated by the proposed project for the two phases, with the values used in the analysis boxed. The values outside the ' boxes are shown for comparison. ' OHOL1404 Page 16 Pe»»o»i t Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 3: SITE TRIP GENERATION PS/PFAKHOUR D.1//-Y /TE Land Use llJ CODE, CODF- DEAISJTY Par, (CSF. .IA/PIi.IR/10(lR /N Of1T TOT.I L LV O(IT TOTAL -rva Trip Generation By Right 210 210.190 70 DU SuT)c-F.vn Det. (VDOT) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables PRASE 1 (2020) 210 210170 100 DU e SF Res. (ei 100 DU (using EQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 1,050 210 210.100 100 DU Single-Fam.Det (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD -OUT (2026) 230 230,000 200 DU Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 15 73 88 70 34 104 1,172 230 230.180 40 OU a TH Res @ 40 DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 210 231 400 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 a3 47 130 11303 Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Daily Effective Trip Rates (2,9) 2• a % Inbound 2•wa % Inbound Weekday 210 Single -Faro Det. (VDOT) DU 0.76 25% 1.00 63% 10.00 210 SF Rcs. © 100 DU DU 0.80 25% 0.91 63% 10.50 AVE 210 Single -ram Det. DU 0.75 25% 1.00 63% 9,52 AVE 230 Tounhousc DU 0.44 17% 0.52 67% 5.86 230 TII Res Qa 40 DU DU 0.63 16% 0.70 68% 7.25 Tounhousc (VDOT Staunton District hate) DU 0.63 23% 0.81 6,1% 8.14 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012. Average trip rates used, unless noted with W, then equations used at size shown, with data sat OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SO > 110 % of eve. (1) ITE Land Code shown as the first 3 digits. Decimal shown for Internal use by Pennonl for lookup table for trip rate variable. (2) EffectKo trip rates calculated by land use: For aycnge rates = (Density) x (aye. Wp rate) = 2-way Trips ; x (Inbound percentage) for Trips In For RE equations, 'e' noted = (Density) x ( trip equation) = 2-way Trips ; x (Inbound percentage) for Trips In (3) Assumed 80% of townhouses at Staunton District effective Rates for townhouse, condo, or apartment. The site trip generation of approximately 2,650 ADT was assigned to the roadway network as documented in the traffic impact study for the land use application. Traffic assignments were based on two scenarios: • Short-term 2020 with 100 SF DU and only access to Papermill Road • Long-term 2026 with site build -out and an interparcel connection through the Madison Village site to US Route 522 north. The interparcel connection between the Freedom Manor and Madison Village to the north was assumed to be open for 2026 total conditions, giving trips for both developments a choice between two entrances. Consequently, Madison Village and Freedom Manor traffic assignments needed to be altered for localized diversions. DHOL1404 Pennonx Page 17 2020 SHORT-TERM © o N N ... 12 4 t7 of n, (i) as (z7) Site Entrance 1,050 i7� �3 N n N r-. VOLUMES B (B) U C (D) UI o Site Entrance �^ ro o a v w = U E 7 U � OVERALL ICU = A (A) LOS WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION A (B) C] A (A) a Q Site Entrance ro 0 _ J •� o Q U O OVERALL c% A (A) LOS = A (B) LOS WITH ROUNDABOUT Approximate Site Boundary LEGEND (� I •t a TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAYADT LANE GEOMETRY u' STOP SIGN • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) 2026 LONG-TERM O o �p o % ro 113 (61) 99 (55) Site Entrance 3,180 t � 0 N r. VOLUMES Q �B(B) /✓= C (E) U ' o Site Entrance U 7 O a. n= OVERALL w v ICU = A (A) LOS WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION OO w(C) U_ A(A)a Site Entrance v ro tx o � ca OVERALL w LOS = A (B) MOB—)] LOS WITH ROUNDABOUT FREEDOM MANOR PAPERMILL ROAD TRAFFIC FIGURE 5 ROUNDABOUT Jus'nFICATION VOLUMES WITH FREEDOM MANOR DHOL1,104 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA ROUNDABOUT August?015 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1 f L c) Future Traffic Volumes with Freedom Manor Roundabout With the proposed site access, the Daily volumes on Papermill Road are anticipated to increase to 12,250 VPD in 2020, and up to 12,800 in 2026. Freedom Manor access is anticipated to accommodate 1,050 VPD north of Papermill Road in the short-term and approximately 3,200 VPD in the long-term with build -out as a local street. d) Short-term Traffic Operations The summary of peak hour trips for the short- term and long-term traffic at the roundabout is included in Figure 5. The graphic shows both scenarios with the site, the peak hour volumes at the roundabout and the LOS by approach for the single lane roundabout. The aaSIDRA worksheets for 2020 and 2026 conditions with the site are included in Appendix B of this report. An assessment of the projected volumes on Papermill Road determined single lane approaches could be adequate. Figure 6 shows the lane configuration tested for the short-term traffic volumes. Figure 6: Short -Term Freedom Manor Lane Configuration The results of the analysis show the Papermill Road approaches operating at a LOS "A" in ' the AM peak and at a LOS `B" during the PM peak hour under the projected 2020 traffic volumes. The degree of saturation for all movements is at 0.50 or better, well below the ' DHOL1404 Page 19 Pennoni 1 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 capacity of the roundabout. Figures 6A and 6B show the delay and degree of saturation for the AM and PM Peak hours, respectively. DELAY (CONTROL) DEGREE OF SATURATION Avenge control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity tvlc ratio) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout New site Roundabout All Move_ t Classes AD Movement Classes South East North intersection 8.8 8.8 7A 9.0 s:.rh Est North Intersection LOS A A A A 7 4' 0. 1 C 0 M 0A7 L l L 7J s Papermill Road iCacl ,+ A 6.5 ' 010� ® t low [ _ 010� Papermill Road Papermill Read 8« `47 � r it Colour code based on Level of Senn ®---0 Colour code based on Degree of Saturaeon LOSA LOS 9 LO5. r_ _,1S D LOSE LOSF Continuous [<0.61 [0.8-0.71 ]0.7-0.8] [0.8-0.9] (0.9-1,0[ [,1-01 Continuous Figure 6A: Short -Term 2020 AM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 20 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification st 12, 2015 DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance flew site Roundabout M No Big Gases Soto East North mtersectiorn 9.2 6.1 13 4 114 Lor. A A a 8 IL 134 PapeanMl. Road tm y CM rn I PaMarllll RoM r DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vlc ratio) Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance All Movement rlasses Sow East North Intersection 0.50 0-06 0.87 0.67 Papermla Road Pape", lll Road Si. r 006� Colour code oaseo on Level of G vice Colour code based on Degree of 3aturaion LOS A LOS 8 LO5 C LOS D LOS E LOS F Continuous (` 0.81 10.8 - 071 (0.7 - 0.8 1 (0 8 - 0 91 (0.9 - 1 01 (, 1 01 Continuous Figure 6B: Short -Term 2020 PM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation e) Long-term Traffic Operations A single lane roundabout was checked based on the HCM 2010/FHWA Roundabout Guidelines, as summarized in Table 4. Consistent with the aaSIDRA analysis, both the AM and PM volumes from Figure 5 are below the approach and conflicting capacity of a single lane roundabout. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 21 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 201S � I TABLE 4: LONG-TER-m, SINGLE LANE ROUNDABOUT CAPACITY CHECK FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, Equation 4-3, Operations One -Lane Roundabout AM Conflicting Lane Entering Volume OK? Volume Capacity ( EB 0 456 716 OK WB 212 404 754 OK NB 441 57 1067 OK SB 357 99 1023 OK PM Conflicting Lane Entering Volume OK? Volume Capacity (lu EB 0 779 519 OK WB 116 448 722 OK N B 542 100 1022 OK S B 724 55 1070 OK NOTE: No adjustments for Heavy Vehicle Flow or PHF in estimates. All entries are pc/hr (Passenger car equivalents). The proposed lane configurations for the 2026 conditions remain the same as the short-term scenario. No new legs were added and the Papermill Road widening as envisioned in the County Comprehensive Plan has not been initiated. Instead the roundabout was tested with additional turning traffic at the Freedom Manor intersection, and with extra growth to verify if the single lane roundabout is adequate. The alternative design would be to add separate left and right turn lanes on Papermill Road as a conventional intersection. LOS was included in the original traffic study. Figures 7A and 7B show the delay and degree of saturation for the AM and PM Peak hours, respectively, for the long-term traffic scenario. Pennons DHOL1404 Page 22 II Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 u DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or avenge pedestrian delay (seconds) V Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement classes South East North Intersection 8.9 9.4 _ 8.4 8.8 LOS A Af A A Papermill Road 9;L 41 y4r Papermill Road r DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Vohrne to Capacity (vlc ratio) ® Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New site Roundabout All Movement Clas ses ]�-_& East North Intersetion 7 4- 0 33 0.41 0.47 IL Paper n ll Road Papermill Road ;f- 47 ir o33L 033� Colour rode based on Degree of Saturation Coour code based on Levu of Sc—oce—_--�-0 [<061 (o.e-0.71 [07-081 708-091 [09-101 [1101 ContinLnJS LOS A LOS 8 LOS, C LOS D LOS c LOS F Conhn�ous Figure 7A: Long -Term 2026 AM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation The results of the analysis show acceptable operation during both AM and PM peak hours under the projected 2026 traffic volumes. The AM approaches all operate at LOS "A", while the PM peak conditions operate at LOS "A" exiting Freedom Manor. Through traffic on Papermill Road operates at a LOS `B-C" conditions. The worst performing approach is projected to be eastbound Papermill Road (north leg), operating at LOS "C" during the PM peak hour with a saturation level at less 0.80. This scenario recognizes that the design as suggested does have capacity for increased traffic without widen to a multi -lane roundabout. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 23 11 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) ® Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout AM Movement Classes South East North Intersection 12.1 7.7 18.0 14.8 LOS 8 A C 8 Dapermill Road DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (Wc ratio) ® Site: 2026 PM Papefmill Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout AN Movement Classes Sadr East North kbersetban 0.60 0.19 0.77 0.77 L lon �r Papermill Road 019 e 1n. '730errrw Road Papermill Road a 60 0 6C �r r C���on rof Sakrabon wbur bode oases �n I eve of Seance _-®-� r�r [<0.81 [0.6-0.71 [a.7-n.a) [g.a-g.gt [o.e-' O1 [, 10) Continuous L OSA L _ LOS C LOG 0 LC : = LOS F Continuous Figure 7B: Long -Term 2026 PM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation 5. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS Based on the procedures described in the Manuel of Traffic Signal Design published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Pennoni has reviewed alternative traffic operations as unsignalized control. As noted in the summary, adding turn lanes and shifting the Papermill Road centerline to accommodate a left turn lane transition would require off -site frontage along the feet long frontage. Without off -site R-O-W, this implementation would not be able to be implemented without modifications or waivers of VDOT design criteria. Pennoni did also check if signalization at the site entrance may be pursued as an alternative to mainline turn lanes on Papermill Road with traffic signal warrant analysis for the subject roundabout. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 24 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 For the signal analysis, Pennoni reviewed daily and peak hour volume thresholds to verify if signalization could be considered. Overall, the signalization would not be satisfied, assuming a 50% right turn on red option for the Freedom Manor side street turns. Tables 5A and 513 show the long-term Daily and Peak Hour signal warrants. TART F r,A • 2(126 PAP-PRMTT.T. RT) /FRF.vnnm MANOR STGNAL DAILY WARRANT Intersection: Papermlll Road & Site Entrance Analysis Year: 2026 Total Conditions (50% RTOR) Signal Warrant Type: ITE Daily Warrant EADT Major EADT Minor 12,805 vpd 781 vpd Urban: Yes Rural: no Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher 1. Minimum Vehicular Warrant Unsatisfied street (total of both approaches) volume minor street (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach AfyorStree1 AfinorSJ-1 Urban ILrral Urban Rural 1 x 1 x 8,000 [� 5,600 2,400 1,680 2 or more 1 9.600 6,720 2,400 1.680 2 or more 2 or more 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 or more 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher Traffic Warrant Unsatisfied street (total of both approaches) volume minor street (one direction only) Number of lanes for mo,;ng traffic on each approach AGyor St"a Minor Street UrInn ((nn 16nd Url-, 16ral 1 x 1 x 12.000 [.__i 8,400 1,200 850 2 or more 1 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more 2 or more 14,400 10.080 1,600 1,120 1 2 or more 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Unsatisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied but following warrants fulfilled 80% or more ❑ 1 ❑ 2 L� (') Major Street EADT-Total of Both Approaches (") Minor Street EADT- Highc, Volume approach. Half of ADT EADT=Estimated Average Daily Traffic Note: 1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if separate signal phase is to be provided for the left -turn movements 2. To be used only for new intersections or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Manual of Irattic signal Uesign DHOL1404 Pennons Page 25 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 5B: 2026 PAPERNIILL RD/FREEDON[ MANOR SIGNAL PEAK HOUR WARRANT Intersection: Papermill Road & Site Entrance Analysis Year: 2026 Total Conditions (50% RTOR) Signal Warrant Type: MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant 600 500 MINOR 100 STREET HIGHER - VOLUME 300 APPROACH- VPH ?on 100 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour (Applicable Curve) 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES 2 OR MORE LANES & I LANE — 1 LAtJE & I LANE 155 I 85 J _i 150' 100' 4010 500 600 700 900 1000 1 ' 0 13C0 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 803 1,153 MAJOR S1 —TOTAL OF B H APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPI-I') 'Mote. 150 vph appltos as the lower throshcld Volume'or a minor-straot approach with Iwo or more banes and 100 vph appues as thr: !rwer threshold volume for a minor -street aporoach witn one lane. Source: MUTCD Signal Warrants - Warrant 3 - Figure 4C-4 Analysis: Pennoni Associates, Inc. AM Peak • PM Peak,*,, Major Street - Papermill Rd. Total of Both Approaches: 798 VPH 1,266 VPH WARRANT NOT SATISFIED Minor Street - Site Entrance Higher Volume Approach: 155 VPH 85 VPH DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 26 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 11 6. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS As previously noted and shown in Exhibit A and the level of services in Figures 6A through 713, the Papermill Road/Freedom Manor site access intersection can function as a single lane roundabout, as an alternative to adding left and right turn lanes on Route 644. The addition of a roundabout would provide improved access and allows for a design to be implemented with the initial phase of development. Under the existing zoning approvals, a left turn lane was not provided with the approved access, so geometric improvements associated with the upgraded in land use entitlement provide a superior access plan, in relation to the existing approvals for 70 single family detached homes. The roundabout design concept does recognize a shift in the location of the intersection, in order to assist in the traffic calming along Route 644. The off -set intersection allow for through traffic on Papermill Road eastbound to slow down from the west as they approach the roundabout, and avoid higher speeds within the circle, or traffic cutting through the roundabout with the splitters and island. The radii proposed and the general configuration are suggested as a concept to allow the roundabout to be constructed as part of the initial development of the site, without requiring off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road. For the zoning entitlement, the developers request VDOT and the County support the alternative roundabout in order to allow the application to continue. The alternative satisfies VDOT criteria and allows for ultimate dedication for a half section of a 4 lane divided facility along Papermill Road, should the CountyNDOT or others pursue widening in the future. The roundabout will provide excellent traffic operations for the short- and long term scenarios with the proposed rezoning. A comparison of the roundabout LOS with LOS delay and degree of saturation is summarized in Table 6A for the short-term and Table 6B for the long-term forecasts, with a comparison to the conventional unsignalized intersection operations with turns lanes. The roundabout maintain LOS at LOS "C" or better for all movements as a single lane roundabout. Therefore the roundabout would provide adequate access for the site, and will provide an alternative to off -site R-O-W, to allow safe access to the property with initial development. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 27 � I Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 6A: SHORT-TERM PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS Traffic Control Lane Group/ , Approach A61 Peak flour PNI Peak flour 2 LOS Delay= (In sec) Back of 2 Qucuc (in feet) Degree of 2 Sahrr2tlon 2 Los Dclay2 (in sec) Back of 2 Queue (in feet) Degree of 2 Saturation WB/L C 18.3 25 D 26.4 25 WB/R B 11.5 25 13 11.4 0 WB LOS C 16.9 - C 23.3 - NB/rR A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 Unsinalrra d NB LOS A 0.0 - A 0.0 - SB/L A 8.4 0 A 8.5 0 SBri, A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 SB LOS A 0.1 - A 0.1 - ICUa A 34.9% - - A 43.7% - WB/LR A 6.6 1 25 0.10 A 6.1 25 0.06 WB LOS A 6.6 0.10 A 6.1 - 0.06 NWilt A 8.6 70 0.47 A 9.2 80 0.50 Roundabout NB LOS A 8.6 - 0.47 A 9.2 - 0.50 SB/LT A 7.4 43 0.36 B 13.4 145 0.67 SB LOS A 7.4 - 0.36 B 13.4 - 0.67 Overall A 8.0 - 0.47 13 8.8 - 0.67 (1) EB = Eastbound WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound SB = Soulbbound, L: Lclt, T[Ihnt, K: Iuglil (2) Unsignalbcd %atues calculted with IICht medtodology using Synchro 8. SIDRA used for roundabout. (3) Intersection Capacity Utilbation. TABLE GB: LONG-TERM PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS Traffic Control Lane Grou � Approach ANI Peak (lour I'M Peak (lour 2 LOS Delay (in sec) Back of 2 Queue (in feet) Degree of 2 SatunUion 2 LOS Dclay2 (in sec) Back of 2 Queue (in feet) Degree of 2 Saturation WB/L C 23.9 40 E 45.3 45 W B/R B 12.3 25 B 11.8 25 WB LOS C 17.7 - D 27.7 - - N Bff A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 Unsignalized NB/R A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 NB LOS A 0.0 - - A 0.0 - SB/L A 8A 25 - A 8.7 0 SB/r A 0.0 0 - A 0.0 0 SB LOS A 1.3 - - A 1.2 - [cc A 40.1% - - A 42.8% WB/LR A 9.4 33 0.33 A 7.7 25 0.19 WB LOS A 9.4 - 0.33 A 7.7 - 0.19 NBfrR A 8.9 65 0.47 13 12.1 103 0.60 Roundabout NB LOS A 8.9 0.47 13 12.1 1 - 0.60 SB/LT A 8.4 50 0.41 C 18.0 205 0.77 SB LOS A 8.4 - 0.41 C 18.0 - 0.77 Overall A 8.8 - 0A7 B 14.8 0.77 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Left, 1:1lint, K: tctglit (2) Unsignalbed values calculated with IICM tnedtodology using Synchro 8. SIDRA used for roundabout. (3) Intersection Capacity Utilization. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 28 i i i � APPCNDIX Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 APPENDIXA: ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER CO ORDINA TION FOR PAPERMILL RD Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 APPENDIX B: AASIDRA WORKSHEETS r I I 1 L I'. Pennoni I I TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR FREEDOM MANOR FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA I A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Located in Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Dave Holliday Construction 420 W Jubal Early Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 667-2120 Prepared by: Pennoni Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects 13880 Dulles Corner Ln, Ste 100 Pennoni Herndon, Virginia 20171 T 703.449.6700 • F 703.4,19.6713 October 28, 2014 Revised August 12, 2015 OW DOUGLAS P. KE NEDY 1-110.21450 9-1-15 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................12 A) CURRENT AND PROPOSED LAND USE............................................................................................................12 B) STUDY OBJECTIVE..................................................................................................................................... 13 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION..........................................................................................................16 A) EXISTING ROADWAYS................................................................................................................................ 16 8) FUTURE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................................................. 16 C) CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES........................................................................................................................16 4. ANALYSIS OF 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS........................................................................................20 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES................................................................................................... 20 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 22 4. ANALYSIS OF 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................25 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH.................................................................................................................................... 25 B) APPROVED / UNBUILT BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................25 C) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................30 D) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................30 S. SITE TRIP GENERATION.....................................................................................................................35 6. 2020 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS (PHASE 1)......................................37 7. ANALYSIS OF 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................40 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................40 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSES...............................................................................................40 8. ANALYSIS OF 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS................................................................................46 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH....................................................................................................................................46 B) APPROVED / UNBUILT BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENTS....................................................................................46 C) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................................46 D) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSIS................................................................................................46 9. ANALYSIS OF 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS.............................................................................................54 A) DAILY AND PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES...................................................................................................54 B) CAPACITY ANALYSIS AND QUEUING ANALYSES...............................................................................................61 10. TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS......................................................................................................66 11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................................71 LIST OF FIGURES 1--igure 1: Site Location ................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Ifigure 2: Site Parcels..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 figure 2A: General Development Plan.......................................................................................................................................... 4 Figure3: Study Area Roadways.................................................................................................................................................... 6 Figure 311: Recom»>ended Improvenients...................................................................................................................................... 11 I~igirre 4: Nearby Uses................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 4A: Eastern Frederick Count, Long -Term Land Use Plan............................................................................................. 15 Figure 5: 2030 Frederick CounD, Comprebensive Transportation Plan (Road Classification) ...................................................... 18 Figure 6. 2030 Frederick Count Comprehensive Transportation Plan (Racer! Cross Section)...................................................... 19 Figure 7: 2014 Existing Traff c Voluues................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 8: 2014 Existing Traffic Conditions ................................................................................................................................. 24 Figure 9: 2020 Background Growth Trc f is Volrunes................................................................................................................. 27 Figure 10. 2020 Background Deuelopnrent TrafficAssigirmenis.................................................................................................. 29 I=igirre 11: 2020 Background Traffic Vobu»es............................................................................................................................ 33 Figure 12: 2020 Background Traffic Conditions.......................................................................................................................... 34 Figure 13: 2020 Site (Phase 1) Traffic Distributions.................................................................................................................. 38 Figure 14: 2020 Site (Phase 1) Traff c Assignments................................................................................................................... 39 Figure15. 2020 Total Traffic Vobunes...................................................................................................................................... 44 figure16: 2020 Tolal Traffic Conditions.................................................................................................................................... 45 Figure 17: 2026 Background Growth Traffic Volumes............................................................................................................... 49 Figure 18: 2026 Background Development T rr fie Assignments.................................................................................................. 50 Figure 19: 2026 Background Traffic Volumes............................................................................................................................ 51 Figure 20: 2026 Background Traffic Conditions .......................................................................................................................... 53 Figure 21: 2026 Background Development Trc fic Assignmenls wl Inlerparcel Connection......................................................... 56 Figure 22: 2026 Background Traffic Volunies wl Interparcel Connection................................................................................... 57 Figure 23: 2026 Site (Build -Out) Traffic Distributions............................................................................................................... 58 Figure 24: 2026 Site (Build -Out) Traffic Assigame,rts................................................................................................................ 59 figure25: 2026 Total Trc fic Vobums...................................................................................................................................... 60 Figure26: 2026 Total Tnigc Conditions.................................................................................................................................... 65 LIST OF TABLES TABLE1: PROPOSED LAND USE DENSITIES...................................................................................................................... 12 TABLE 2: 2013 EXISTING LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%rll.E) Ri sul:rs........................................................................... 23 TAI31.E 3: HISTORICAL. TRAFFIC GROWTI I.......................................................................................................................... 26 TABLE 4: OTIIER DEVELOPMENTS —TRIP GENERATION...............................................................................................28 TABLE 5: 2020 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (950/; rri.E) RESUI:I'S.................................................................. 32 TABLE6: SITETRIP GENERATION....................................................................................................................................... 36 T,1BI.E 7: 2020 TOTAI. LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%riLE) REsui: rs................................................................................. 43 TABLE 8: 2026 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (950/;ru.E) RESUI:1's.................................................................. 52 TABLE9: SITE TRIP GENERATION....................................................................................................................................... 55 TABLE 9A: SITE IMPACT AT PAPER\Iti.i. ROAD.................................................................................................................. 62 TABLE 10: 2026 TOTAL. LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%T'11.E) RL'SUINS.............................................................................. 64 TABLE 11: RIGi rr-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS A'r SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) ............... 67 TABLE 12: RIGIrr-TI,'Iuv LANE WARRANT' ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTA1. CONDITIONS) ............... 68 TABLE 13: LEI71=TumN LANE WARRANTANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL. CONDITIONS) .................. 69 TABLE 14: LErr-TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTAI. CONDITIONS) .................. 70 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A: SCOPING DOCUMENTS APPENDIX B: TRAFFIC COUNTS APPENDIX C: 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 WORKSHEETS APPENDIX D: BACKGROUND DEVELOPtvLENT DISTRIBUTIONS AND ASSIGNMENTS APPENDIX E: 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 WORKSHEETS APPENDIX F: 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 & SIDRA WORKSHEETS APPENDIX G: 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS — SYNCI-IRO 8 WORKSHEETS APPENDIX H: 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS — SYNCHRO 8 & SIDRA WORKSHEETS Contact Information The analysis was prepared by Pennoni Associates Inc. : Mr. Ronald Mislowsky, P.E. Mr. Patrick Sowers, P.E. Mr. Douglas R. Kennedy, P.E. Mr. Wan Chong, E.I.T. Mr. Graham P. Young, E.I.T. Pennoni Associates Inc. 13880 Diilles Corner Lane, Suite 100 Herndon, Virginia 20171 (703) 449-6700 ' A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ' Pennoni Associates Inc. has prepared this report to present the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed development of "Freedom Manor" in Frederick County, VA. As shown in Figure 1, the subject 47.5 acre site is located southeast of Winchester, VA, between 1-8 1, Papermill Road (Route 644), and Route 522 (Front Royal Pike). The analysis was based on the requirements of Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). A scoping agreement is included in Appendix A. ' Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) submitted a traffic memo for the subject parcel on July 22, 2004 in support of a rezoning, and was approved for 70 single-family detached residential units in the site's southern 26.9 acres parcel and two site access locations, via ' Papermill Road and a secondary access to Route 522. The zoning was approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in September 2005 for an RP (Residential ' Perfo►mance Zoning). The proffers included a regional road contribution as well as language not to include a connection to Westwood Drive (VA Route 822). As shown in Figure 2, this project proposes an expansion of the rezoning area to utilize the ' site's northern parcels for an overall site density of 100 single-family detached residential units and a mix of 200 townhomes and apartments. Two site access points are proposed, one on Papermill Road and the other to Route 522 via an interparcel connection to the approved Madison Village development to the north. The general development plan also allows for a third interparcel access to accommodate VDOT guidance for one access for every 100 DU (dwelling units) with an access stub to the west. As discussed with VDOT, ' a scaled generalized development plan is shown in Figure 2A in lieu of a concept plan since the site is only in the rezoning phase. ' The project is planned to be constructed in two phases. Phase I would consist of the 100 single-family detached residential units with access to Papermill Road and Phase 2 would consist of 200 townhomes and apartments. Accordingly, two analysis years, 2020 for Phase ' I and 2026 for Phase 2 were analyzed in this report. The interparcel connection with Madison Village was assumed for 2026 only. At build -out (2026), the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,643 daily trips and 206 and 249 trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. ' The proposed development -generated average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed the 5,000 vehicle threshold for a "Chapter 527" submission. However, Pennoni prepared this report in accordance with "Chapter 527" guidelines contained in § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24 VAC 30-155), for submittal to Frederick County, VA, and VDOT Staunton District planning staff. ' Based on VDOT comments, the report is revised from the original analysis in October 2014 to include a roundabout at the Papermill Road site access. A separate roundabout ' justification is provided to supplement this report. ' DHOL1404 Page 1 Pennoni �j 661 669 179 (761 661,, i 371 Winchester _ i�6s9 I 1 65 I 1 1 i 6S6 1,622) 62° SITE 6j1 , Stephens City 1 2 77 bSa Middletown 627 672 f 6S7 a 13' I b�. c • Sky Meadows State f a(k FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 1 off rRAFrU' 1%11'\("T,;TI DN SITE LOCATION FREDEMCK COUNTY, VA l ' A. 00 - Madison f1I� Village \ ♦ i Connection at ` Madison Village ■ ■ • -- - 1 ■ r \J A t ■ Wa N ■ p'estwood Drive ■ LEGEND Project Site (47.5 Ac) Ex. Freedom Manor (26.9 Ac) Ex. RP Zone (7.1 Ac) Ex. RA Zoning (13.5 Ac) �1 / I • Proposed Entrance� { Shenandoah Memorial Park ' Existing Signal FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 2 I RAFFl( [Nil' V T Sn n) SITE PARCELS FREDERICK COUNTY. VA N Figure 2A: General Development Plan I Madison Village Road and Trail Connection to Madison Village / Road and Trail / Connection to / TM 63-A-145 �� _ - j 1 1 Westwood Drive 1 North/South Proposed 1 Connector Road 10. Tr&H or Bike Lane ' Proposed Proposed Roundabout ,y 10' Tr&U �r SUBJECT PROPERTY Cb a .0 Proposed R/11 Dedication Gf c� Shenandoah a o Memorial Park J 0 FREEDOM MANOR Generalized Development Plan fREDER/CK COUNTY, NRG/N!A Existing Signal Lon-gcxott Rd I Bentley Avenu Vine Lane PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 1 This traffic study analyzed the study area intersections for the weekday AM and PM peak hours for 2014 existing conditions, 2020 conditions with and without the proposed development, and 2026 conditions with and without the proposed development. Design years are intended to allow for market absorption and general growth in the vicinity. Final build -out year will vary. As shown in Figure 3, the study intersections are: 1. Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Proposed: Roundabout) 2, Madison Village internal intersection (Proposed: Roundabout) 3. Madison Village Entrance & Route 522 (Proposed: Signalized) 4. Route 522 & Papermill Road (Existing: Signalized) 5. Route 522 & Justes Drive (Existing: Signalized) General growth of 1.5% per year was added to the existing volumes and other background developments in the vicinity of the site were entered into the assignments to assess future conditions as well. Freedom Manor site traffic distributions were referred from the original approved TIA submitted for the rezoning application. The study intersections were analyzed for Level -Of -Service (LOS), queue lengths, and delay for 2014 existing conditions, and 2020 and 2026 future conditions, with and without anticipated site traffic. Turn -lane warrants at the site entrance on Papermill Road were also reviewed and documented. Based on comparisons of 2005 and 2013 traffic counts from previous studies, VDOT requested new counts for the Route 522 & Papermill Road signal to better assess existing conditions. This analysis was included in the base year conditions. Based on the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed subject development and the evaluation of 2014 existing conditions, 2020 background conditions, 2020 total conditions, 2026 background conditions, and 2026 total conditions, it was found that the surrounding roadway network can adequately accommodate the proposed site densities. The conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows: a) Trip Generation The proposed development would be built in two phases. Phase 1 is planned for initial site access for the single-family residential community with access to Papermill Road and would generate 1,050 daily trips, 80 trips during the AM peak hour, and 91 trips during the PM peak hour. Build -out of the project with access to Madison Village is projected to generate a total of 2,643 daily trips, 206 trips during the AM peak hour, and 249 trips during the PM peak hour. 1 Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 5 11 d oe� cc 7 0 winchestf, 9� Airpot' IL sn 1 °= 11 BG`' Kohl's Distrdmion Cente 1 1 Approximate She ,p 1 Boundary 9 4� � I Srr1 I J 644 ass I I SITE LEGEND [�I STUDY INTERSECTIONS I PROPOSED ROADWAY Shenandoah Memonal Perk T O O SI2 E ver~ r Elementary Scl I 40 Byrd Middle `,it,,-, tlala NOurcv: tomiok, �iap, LIII FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 3 i t STUDY AREA FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Intersections Papermill Road (Route 644) & Site Entrance This unsignalized intersection is proposed to be built as a roundabout with Phase I of the project for primary site access. Phase 2 of the project would introduce Madison Village trips as well with the proposed interparcel connection. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable overall LOS "B" under both Phase 1 and Phase 2 conditions, with approach LOS at "C" or better conditions. Without a roundabout, the westbound approach out of the site during the 2026 PM peak hour is projected to operate at LOS "E" primarily, due to the high through volumes on Papermill Road. There were no projected queueing issues. Signalization is not anticipated to be warranted at the site entrance. Without a roundabout, a southbound Papermill Road left -turn lane and a northbound Papermill Road right -turn taper would be warranted with 2020 total PM peak hour volumes. The left -turn lane would be warranted with both AM and PM peak hour volumes under 2026 peak hour volumes. In addition, the 2026 PM peak hour volume would meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, Pennoni has engaged several iterations of alternatives including reviewing minimum left turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication would be available. As noted in previous meetings with VDOT, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) would not support partial dedications or easements to allow the Papermill Road widening to be shared between the property owners at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit the turn lane improvements along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even an option with a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported by the adjacent property owner's representatives. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed DHOL1404 Page 7 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes not proposed with this revision. Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Conunercial Streets This proposed roundabout, to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "A" for all peak hours and analysis years. The roundabout was modeled as single -lane, with single -lane approaches and an inscribed diameter of 110 ft. Since this was an internal intersection off -site to Freedom Manor, the LOS is based on the HCM methodology as used in the Madison Village Traffic Study, but updated with revised traffic volumes with Freedom Manor. illfadison Village Entrance Road & Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) This proposed signalized intersection, also to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "B" for all peak hours and analysis years with approach LOS "D" or better. There were no projected queueing issues with the turn lane storage lengths suggested in this TIA. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "B" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D". Under 2020 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D". Under 2026 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate further- to LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "E". Under 2020 total conditions with the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach will operate at LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D" without improvements. Under 2026 total PM conditions, the overall intersection LOS would be an "E". DHOL1404 Page 8 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' To alleviate the undesirable LOS without the site and address eastbound and northbound queueing during the future analysis years, the following ' improvements are recommended, regardless of the subject site rezoning: 1. Lengthen the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn pocket, ' currently about 35 ft, to 325 ft. Due to the short existing turn lane, the LOS was shown without a separate turn lane in the revised analysis. ' 2. Incorporate an eastbound right -turn overlap phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase into the ' signal timing. 3. Lengthen northbound Route 522 northbound left -turn pocket ' by restriping the center lane on Route 522, currently about 300 ft, to 425 ft. ' With these recommended improvements, the overall intersection LOS would improve to "C" or better and the right -turn storage would be sufficient for 95"' percentile queues for the critical 2026 PM peak hours. Approach LOS would also improve to LOS "D" or better. Site impacts are negligible at the signal, at 2.7 percent of the intersection's total hourly ' traffic volume in the 2020 PM peak hour and 4.5 percent in the 2026 PM peak hour, with the PM peak hour being considered because it was worse than the AM peak hour. So off -site right turn lane (construction) is not 11 recommended with site development. The site is providing Papermill Road improvements at its entrance. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Justes Drive This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "A" in both peak hours, with all approach LOS at "B" or better. It will operate at overall LOS "B" under 2020 and 2026 background as well as total conditions. All the approaches will operate at LOS "D" or better. There were no observed queueing issues for any of the analysis years. c) Final Assessment: The proposed site densities can be adequately accommodated by the surrounding roadway network with a roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road as shown in Figure 3A. Off -site mitigations that could be considered by the County with or without the site are: Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 9 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 1. Lengthening of the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn lane at its intersection with Route 522 from the existing 35 ft to 325 ft. 2. At the same intersection, incorporating an eastbound right -turn overlap signal phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 10 �vso�oe r Entrance � .'` 7117,m \III• \ \ \ \ _____I \ I Connect to 1 \\ 1 Madison Village, =rT'� \On-Site i J I I — ir"Approximate Site Boundary '>i j l ' SITE re I I I --i I Site Entrance o rt I c� O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT — — — FUTURE ROADWAY 2 w m,m 1e\644) Road (R r— — — — — — — — — — — I I Design Concept I I single lane I I 1 roundabout I.10 tt I I inscribed circle I off -set to northeast. I ------------I LEGEND N IMPROVEMENTS: r--I BY FREEDOM MANOR //a BY MADISON VILLAGE r I FOR CONSIDERATION, 1 --1 BY OTHERS C N vi T � Paperrnill Road (Route 644)� I I I I I --L--- Extend EBR 1 I j----- I storage I I from 35 ft to i ---� -- 325 11. 1 --------- --.—, 7.-.,—.--.,--1 I rewiring to incorporate an overlap I ___L___ right turn. I Phase for the eastbound _ ----1 1 Adjust center --- I turn lane I r---------J storage: I Justrs Dri I 1 +125 ft NB 1 1 and -125 ft SB 1 FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 3A • TR.%FFIC IMPA( I SIt, I) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS °"""4114 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Iu,Lu.sr201� A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 2. INTRODUCTION Pennoni Associates Inc. has prepared this report to present the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) associated with the proposed development of "Freedom Manor" in Frederick County, VA. As shown in Figure 1, the subject 47.5 acre site is located southeast of Winchester, VA, between I-81, Papermill Road (Route 644), and Route 522 (Front Royal Pike). The analysis was based on the requirements of Frederick County and the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). A scoping agreement is included in Appendix A. a) Current and Proposed Land Use Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) submitted a traffic memo for the subject parcel on July 22, 2004 in support of a rezoning, and was approved for 70 single-family detached residential units in the site's southern 26.9 acres parcel and two site access locations, one on Route 522 and the other on Papermill Drive. As shown in Figure 2, this project proposes an expansion to utilize the site's northern parcels for an overall site density of 100 single-family detached residential units and a mix of 200 townhomes and apartments. Two site access points are proposed, one on Papermill Road and the other on Route 522 via an inteiparcel connection with the approved Madison Village development to the north. A roadway connection between the Freedom Manor development and Westwood Drive is not proposed. Also, a roadway stub is proposed to be constructed for a possible future interparcel connection to the west of the site, as shown approximately on Figure 3. The project is planned to be constructed in two phases. Phase 1 would consist of the 100 single-family detached residential units and Phase 2 would consist of 200 townhomes and apartments. Accordingly, two analysis years, 2020 for Phase 1 and 2026 for Phase 2 were analyzed in this report. The intetparcel connection with Madison Village was assumed for 2026 only. The proposed site densities are summarized in Table 1 below. TABLE 1: PROPOSED LAND USE DENSITIES DHOL1404 Page 12 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 As shown on Figure 2 and Figure 4, the site's north parcel is zoned RA (Rural Area District) and the remaining three parcels to the south are zoned RP (Residential, Performance District) on the Frederick County website's "Planning Access Terminal" map (accessed October 23, 2014). The comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is shown in Figure 4A with the area north of Papermill Road planned in the "Eastern Frederick County Long -Term Land Use Plan" as residential to the south and high density residential to the north. Adjacent to the site, the plan shows residential to the east and high density residential to the northwest. The Shenandoah Memorial Park and the properties south of Papermill Road are planned for park uses. At build -out (2026), the proposed development is expected to generate approximately 2,643 daily trips and 206 and 249 trips during the weekday AM and PM peak hours, respectively. b) Study Objective This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) has the following objectives: - Forecast future trips generated by the proposed development, - Analyze and document the traffic impacts of the proposed development on the surrounding road network, and - Identify mitigation options, if needed. Pennoni coordinated with the developer, VDOT staff, and Frederick County staff in August and September of 2014 to define the scope of the traffic study as shown in Appendix A. The proposed development -generated average daily traffic (ADT) does not exceed the 5,000 vehicle threshold for a "Chapter 527" submission. However, Pennoni prepared this report in accordance with "Chapter 527" guidelines contained in § 15.2-2222.1 of the Code of Virginia and the Virginia Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations (24 VAC 30-155), for submittal to Frederick County, VA, and VDOT Staunton District planning staff. DHOL1404 Page 13 Penno N Appraximatc Site Boundan �. 7.'1154MWWW e 1 r'd 0NIJ1 •ter ��+� _ t ±fro 4 f dl oMWi`` w rl_ Ju.cisi cs Drive 5 ;approximate Site Boundary A/`\* MIN �T)t ! • s • r • r n +� i 1 t � '► • • t SI^ ♦ . r \ fi �. �% �.Clb Long Range Land Use Plan cuter• Rt )/ Bvp— I"— 0eva4.p—t A— .. � A r, r Support A— ,10• L—IVWI Support N•, ou.er+. 16—d Use Corwnwr,al 0• . a bgl ..y Co--iil Oa2 03 • n,d.r.lrut A . � Yyarenouw ® /bavy Y�d.ntrW ® 11111aed Uu kld tiMA -0 E.trxwe W-9 _ ErwpbywwN Reti.e..le,t • Pt—d UM oe..� M..d Uw Ag. R•str.<td urea. C-1- R.4rderduM ,.a, QIts 0•n,ey wvdw.eal c u, OIpr 0.may W,.ee.bal t1 t6 u, ft—d 0- Nrph 0—,*V R—d—" 12 16 ur, Rv,1 N•, �r PU",A Res — a R.cr.aem P'. [nvlrpnmerrtally Senslte— Areas _ � w.s.nta• Fiu/Mr - 16, c OSA School re. 6 Wuue Rur,1 -- or..—Wy Ce i� 2030 Comprehensive PCllcy Plar fNap f ADDroved: lily 14th, 2011-.x Amen -Jed: Lune 13th, 2012 FREEDOM MANOR EASTERN FREDERICK COUNTY FIGURE 4A a ' IRAFFIt I!v PA(l i1' LONG TERM LAND USE PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, VA A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 3. BACKGROUND INFORMATION a) Existing Roadways Route 522 (Front Royal Pike): In the site vicinity, Route 522 diverges form US 50 (Millwood Pike) east of the I-81 intersection and connects the City of Winchester to the north with I-66 and the City of Front Royal to the south, traversing a distance of approximately 15 miles, mostly through rural areas. North of Papermill Road, Route 522 carries the VDOT classification of urban minor arterial. South of Papennill Road, VDOT classifies it as a rural minor arterial. It is a 4-lane roadway with a two-way left -turn lane (TWLTL) fi•om US 50 to '/2 mile south of Papermill Road where it becomes 4-lane median - divided. VDOT estimates the Average Daily Traffic (ADT) to be 14,000 vehicles north of Papermill Road and 16,000 vehicles south of Papermill Road. The speed limit is 55 mph in the vicinity of the study area. Papermill Road (Route 644): Papennill Road is an approximately 1.5 mile roadway that starts within the City of Winchester and continues in a southeasterly direction ending at Route 522. It is 2-lane undivided and considered an urban minor collector by VDOT. Papennill Road carried an ADT of 7,600 vehicles in 2014 according to VDOT estimates. The speed limit in the study area is 45 mph. b) Future Transportation Improvements The 2030 Eastern Frederick County Comprehensive Transportation Plans are shown in Figure 5 and Figure 6 in terms of road classification and cross section, respectively. The Plans show Papermill Road is envisioned to become 4-lane divided corridor. Papermill Road's intersection with Route 522 is also shown to be shifted to the south to align with Justes Drive, with Papermill Road continuing past Route 522 to US 50 (Millwood Pike) east of the future Route 37 Bypass. However, no programmed improvements were identified at the scoping session, and accordingly, no future regional transportation improvements were assumed in the analysis. c) Construction Estimates For planning budget purposes using the VDOT 2009 Planning and Mobility estimates (inflated at 3 percent annually to 2018), the proposed and suggested improvements could be budgeted as noted: - Roundabout construction at site entrance, estimated at $1,300,000 plus $200,000 for realigning approximately 180 ft of the southbound Papermill Road approach to the roundabout. - $1,014,500 for the main on -site roadway as a two-lane local street from Papermill Road to the interparcel connection to Madison Village. DHOL1404 Page 16 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Additional off -site improvements suggested to improve existing, background, and total operations: - Extend eastbound Papermill Road right turn lane from 35 ft to 325 ft with 100 ft taper, including utility and R-O-W contingencies at 25% percent of the lane cost. This would equate to $925,000. - Modification of the existing traffic signal operations at Route 522 & Papermill Road to add an eastbound right turn overlap phase, estimated at $5,000 for a 5-section signal head on eastbound approach, related rewiring, and assuming no structural upgrades of the northeast quadrant traffic signal pole. - Restriping of the northbound left turn lane between Papermill Road and Justes Drive to increase left turn storage, estimated at $7,000. These estimates are preliminary and are for general comparisons only, are based on projected 2018 VDOT cost estimates for planning, and not based on final engineering plans for Frederick County or VDOT approval. d) Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities There are no existing pedestrian features along the arterial and collectors. However, with the subdivision improvements in the urban area, sidewalks are proposed. There is currently no bus/transit service outside of Winchester City limits (Win Tran). Papermill Road is designated for a potential future bicycle facility per the Winchester, Frederick County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. A 10' multi -use trail is proffered across the property's Papermill Road frontage, as part of the site improvements. DHOL1404 Page 17 Pennons Eastern Road Plan - Jan 2011 �• %— Mato, Artel- :-proved Malor Art ,— 4" Minor Anendl '-proved Minor Arterial 0 `' Yew Malor Collector \., :mproved Matw Collector \� Yew Mrnor Collector -proved Minor Collector +amp haws .4 Future At )7 Bypass uroan ..d Water y S Aral and S—<e Area ` J RurllC pnmunityCMttr 1 FREEDOM MANOR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE FIGURE 5 TRANSPORTATION PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY, VA (ROAD CLASSIFICATION) .Ilrl„l,tt�s � I Eastern Frederick County •... PlanCross Sections SITE lfa�n o Sr(pn � C+v - ` Eastern Road Plan Cross Sections �V WD .. cyture Rt n BvMSS Urban Development area sewer arM Water S—ce Ar , \! `/ Ru/llCJrnTynityCMtll FREEDOM MANOR 2030 COMPREHENSIVE FIGURE 6 R \I rlc i%lrV'I 1. TRANSPORTATION PLAN 011011404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA (ROAD CROSS SECTIONS) A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 4. ANALYSIS OF 2014 EXISTING CONDITIONS a) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Pennoni conducted weekday peak period manual turning movement traffic counts on Wednesday, October 1, 2014 from 6 AM to 9 AM and 4 PM to 7 PM at the Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road (Route 644) intersection. Based on the turning movements, the weekday AM peak hour was identified to start at 7:15 AM and the PM peak hour peak hour was identified to start at 4:30 PM. The traffic counts are included in Appendix B of this report from Quality Counts, and the AM and PM peak hour volumes are shown graphically on Figure 7. The Route 522 & Justes Drive intersection turning movement volumes were derived from a comparison of the 2014 counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road (by Pennoni) and 2005 counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road and Route 522 & Justes Drive (by VETTRA for the Frederick County Elementary School TIA, June 9, 2005). Based on the observation that the counts at Route 522 & Papermill Road are constant (they actually show a slight decrease) between 2005 and 2014, it was assumed that if the inbound and outbound volumes on Justes Drive to/from Route 522 were counted today, they would be similar to the 2005 VETTRA counts at that intersection (plus non -school -peak elementary school trips to/from Evandale Elementary, built after 2005). The VETTRA counts are also included in Appendix B of this report. The 2013 VETTRA warrant study for Justes Drive only provided AM and PM school peaks. 2014 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) roadway link volumes were calculated based on PM peak hour volumes and a "k" factor of 0.84 and 0.93 for Route 522, north and south of Papermill Road, respectively, and 0.096 for Papermill Road. The "k" factors were taken from VDOT's 2013 Average Daily Traffic Volume Estimates data and peak hour volumes. Consequently, the ADT on Route 522 was estimated at 16,430 vehicles daily north of Papermill Road and 18,680 vehicles daily south of Papermill Road. The ADT on Papermill Road was estimated to be 8,810 vehicles daily. DHOL1404 Page 20 Pennoni ■❑e 0 16,430 ' � 1 Approximate Site Boundary 0 a 'a I T I � c �rrr I 16 430 L -- - -- SITE �I it ------J 1O Road LEGEND O fQ� STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I.OIIU WEEKDAY ADT 17,770 N N Th Papermill Road o ( Route 644) �t 62(121).0 130 (372) o a a Justes Drive to o ,- z a e ? I N (70) Justes Dricc Y t a N Cl v1 N T Or T V h L FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 7 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDI TRAFFIC VOLUMES °110L'04 FREDERICK COUNTY. VA 4ugust2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Peak hour factors and heavy vehicle percentages were calculated based on the traffic counts at the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for 2014 existing conditions. Signal timing data, based on field observations, were also entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for Route 522's intersections with Papermill Road and with Justes Drive. Table 2 and Figure 8 show the 2014 existing lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "D" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during both peak hours. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D" while the Route 522 northbound and southbound approaches operate at LOS "B" and "C", respectively. HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). But it isn't a fully single lane approach either because some right turn vehicles are able to utilize the right turn storage lane, however short, to make right turns on red. Because this is an "in-between" situation, HCM analysis skews the results to be better than actual if analyzed as 2 lanes and worse than actual if analyzed as a single lane approach. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background, and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. For the PM peak, the LOS "D" equates to a 400 ft queue on the approach. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "A" during the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "B" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2014 existing conditions are included in Appendix C of this report. DHOL1404 Page 22 Pennoni Revised August 12, 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor TABLE 2: 2013 EXISTING LOS, DELAY & BOQ 95%TILE RESULTS ' Existing/ AM Peak Ilour PM Peak Flour Lane Group/ Proposed Back of a Back of N intersection Traffic Control t Approach turn -lane a LOS � Delay .t Queue LOS a Delay t Queue ' n lengths (in sec) (in feet) (in sec) (in feet) (feet) EB/LR C 24.6 130 1 D 44.0 400 ' EB LOS C 24.6 - D 44.0 - 161 NBiL 300 A 8.0 51 C 28.9 Route 522 NBr A 6.5 68 B 14.7 134 Si6malized NB/T 4 C NB LOS A 7.0 - B 18.9 - ' Paperntll Road SBR B 19.7 I I S C 32.8 250 SB/TR S13 LOS 13 19.7 - C 32.8 - ' Overall 13 13.9 - C 30.9 - WB/L 225 B 18.0 46 B 18.5 36 WB/R - B 14.7 32 B 15.3 25 NVB LOS 13 15.7 - B 16.4 ' NB/r A 9.5 105 A 7.9 125 N Brr Route 522 Signalized NB/R 325 A 4.9 25 A 4.3 25 5 19, NB LOS A 9.0 A 7.7 - Jtutes Drive SB/L 500 A 6.3 26 A 4.7 25 SBzt' A 3.3 35 A 3.6 94 S ' SB LOS A 4.1 A 3.7 - Overall A 7.7 A 6.0 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Lefl, Ti111ru, R: Right (2) Turn -lane lengttu do not include taper. All values are approximate. ' (3) LOS and Delay values calculated wide IICNI methodology using Synchro 8. (4) 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated using Syn chro 8 proprietary methodology. Minimum assumed to be 25 feet. ' Page 23 DHOL1404 Pennoni N N Approximate Site Boundary 0 N i i SITE I - r__ I I SI It papemill�l Road (Route in LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY g TRAFFIC SIGNAL A AM PEAK LOS PEAK LOS) (A) (PM I BIC) „X � = n T O a � Ij o a �I Papermill Road (Route 644) a C (D)- �m d d OVERALL LOS = B (C) " Analyzed as one lane approach because of shor right turn storage (35' - 65' taper). Justes Driee d 4 d a%Q B (B) B (B) a. t�::3 Justes Drive oL ell 3 d d d 0 OVERALL LOS = A (A) I` FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 8 rRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS D110LI404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Augaa4 2015 IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 4. ANALYSIS OF 2020 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS ' Background traffic volumes represent fixture traffic that would travel through the study area intersections without the proposed Freedom Manor development. The background traffic ' volumes were projected as outlined below. a) Traffic Growth ' Table 3 shows the historical traffic growth trends along Route 522 and along Papermill Road in the immediate vicinity of the site using VDOT ADT data. The average yearly ' growth rates were determined using to be under 1 percent between 2002 and 2012. When 2001 data is introduced, the average yearly growth rate increases due to a sudden increase between 2001 and 2002, which skews the results. Based on these observations, a ' conservative annual growth rate of 1.5 percent was agreed to in the scoping. The volumes grown at 1.5 percent annually are shown in Figure 9. ' b) Approved / Unbuilt Background Developments ' To project the 2020 background traffic conditions, the following background developments and their respective TIA's were considered in the analysis: - Madison Village (TIA by Stowe Engineering, Rev. June 27, 2013) - Frederick County Fourth High School (TIA by VETTRA, December 16, 2013) ' The land use densities and distributions for each development were taken from the TIA's, as well as pass -by and internal trip percentages for the commercial portion of the Madison Village development. The Madison Village trips for residential include the blended VDOT Staunton District townhouse/apartment derived trip rate for non -single- family detached uses. Pass -by and internal trips were included per the previous study. Trip generation for the high school was updated with the most recent edition of the ' Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation (9`" Edition) and for the PM peak hour of the adjacent street. The high school TIA did not indicate the distribution ' split at the Route 522 & Papennill Road intersection, so 15 percent of the 50 percent assigned northbound on Route 522 at Justes Drive were assumed to use Papermill Road. ' The background developments' trip generations are detailed in Table 4. Figure 10 shows the 2020 background development traffic assignments for the AM and PM peak hours. Individual background development distributions and assignments, as well as Madison Village Commercial's pass -by assignments are shown in Appendix D of this report (Figures DI-D5). No Madison Village trips were routed through the Freedom Manor site for the short-term scenario, to be conservative, assuming no interparcel connection with initial development. DHOL1404 Page 25 Pennoni ' Revised August 12, 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor ' TABLE 3: HISTORICAL TRAFFIC GROWTH ' VDOT Traffic Growth Trend Front Royal Pike (Route 522) between Macedonia Church Rd & Pa errnlll Road Effective Effective Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Growth Rate YEAR AADT Growth Rate (4 YR) Rate (6 YR) (10 YR) 2012 15,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.7% 2011 15,000 -6.3/0 -1.6/0 -1.1% 2.3% 2010 16,000 0.0% 0.0% 1.1% 2009 16,000 6.7% 0.0% 1.1% ' 2008 15,000 -6.3 % 0.0% 1.2 % 2007 16,000 0.0% 1.6% 4.9% 2006 16,000 0.0% 3.4% 2005 16,000 6.7% 7.5% ' 2004 15,000 0.0% 2003 15,000 7.1% 2002 14,000 16.7% 12,000 ' Average Growth Ratol 2.2% 1.4'/, 1.0'/e 1 1.5'/0 w/o 2001 0.8% 0.5% 0.2•/ 0.7% Front Royal Pike (Route 522) ' between Route 50 & Papormill Road Effocuvo Effective Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Growth Rate YEAR AADT Growth Rate (4 YR) Rate (6 YR) (10 YR) 2012 14,000 0.0% 0.0% -1.1% 0.0% ' 2011 14,000 0.0% -3.3% -1.1% 3.8% 2010 14,000 0.0% -1.7% -1.1% 2009 14,000 0.0% -1.7% 0.0% 2008 14,000 -12.5% -1.7% 0.0% ' 2007 16,000 6.7% 3.4% 8.9% 2006 15,000 0.0% 1.7% 2005 15,000 0.0% 11.8% 2004 15,000 7.1% ' 2003 14,000 0.0% 2002 14,000 45.8% 2001 9,600 Avorago Growth Ratel 4.3% 1 1.1% 1 0.9% 1 1.9% ' w/o 2001 0.1% -0.5% -0.71/ 0.0% Papermill Road (Route 644) between Route 522 & SCL Winchester ' Effective Effective Effective Annual Growth Rate Effective Growth Growth Rate YEAR AADT Growth Rate (4 YR) Rate (6 YR) (10 YR) 2012 7.800 0.0% -1.5% -2.5% 0.5% 2011 7,800 -6.0% -5.1% -2.5% 2.2% ' 2010 8.300 0.0% -2.3% 0.6% 2009 8,300 0.0% -2.3% 1.3% 2008 8,300 -13.5% 0.9% 1.9% 2007 9,600 5.5% 5.7% 7.3% 2006 9,100 0.0% 5.3% 2005 9,100 13.8% 9.6% 2004 8,000 3.9% 2003 7,700 4.1% 2002 7,400 17.5% 2001 1 6,300 Average Growth Ratel 2.3% 1.3% 1 1.0% 1 1.3% ' w/o 2001 0.8•/ 0.1% -0.3% 0.5% SOURCE: VDOT, Traffic Engineering Ditision, VDOT Awrago Daily Volume Estimates Including Vehicle Classification Estimates, Judsdiclion Report 34. tDHOL1404 Page 26 Pennani t 9.630 �l 17,970 Approximate Site Boundary - N I / J 'I 1 II � i SITE �I 17,970 �I �- --1 SITL Ro Route 644) 9,630 LEGEND © STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,0(III WEEKDAYADT 20,430 19,430 O J x - 1 =- t r v T � u y, k O 'f Papermill Road ( Route 644) t 68 (132)MO 142 (407) T N v, JusteJuste==, 2,680 0 V1 1� p 129 (77) Justes Dri%c tes v 0 L _ FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND GROWTH FIGURE 9 TR-NFFIC IMPACT SILDN TRAFFIC VOLUMES DULL•°°' FREDERICK COUNTY. VA fvvt"r'"I' A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 4: OTHER DEVELOPMENTS -TRIP GENERATION Frederick County Fourth High School'' /rE 1—d Vw yl) AM LEAN HOUR IN /FAN HOUR DdLL.Y CODE C" DENUTY Yu LIE 0 rML LY 2LT IRIdL Proposed Densities (ITE 8th Edition Rates) PHASE: BUILD -OUT 530 530200 1250 stud High School 366 172 5.18 86 163 2,071 TRIP RATE SOURCE Tnp Generation Manual i9th Edition. nstaute of Trsnsportatwn Engwisws. 2010 (1) 'TE -and Code shossn as the first 3 di9ts Decimal shown for irtai use by Pennant (Or lookup tads For Inp rate wabie (2) _ant use and density M shown ,n the TIA for the Frsdenck County FotMh Hgh School. by VETTRA, December 18, 2013) AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Qaft F./fecnve Tnp Ralet (j-ltalt) 7i 1i+asasa Mway %loss—W Weekday High Schaal stud 0A hr" 01 41h 1 ' Madison 3 illa} e rrE t.wl Use (1) AM /FAN NOl/R RM /F-AN HOUR DAILY CME CME DEWTY to MIL LY Ida IItIAL LY 'a, TML Proposed Densities (LTE 8th Fi ition Rates) PHASE: BUILD -OUT 220 220910 480 Du Apannent w 1% 245 I'm 104 298 3,192 JI 231.400 128 Du Tossrihouse (NT)t)T Staunton Duitrict Rate) 19 62 81 - 38 104 1,043 230 230.900 32 DU Townhouse - 12 14 11 6 17 186 Total Residential Trips 70 270 340 271 148 419 4,421 Cis g26ODD 107.000 w Specuky Read 351 381 't.' N)I :b 537 4,742 Total Development Trips 421 651 1,072 572 384 956 9,163 Internal Capture 39% 61% -5% 60% 40% -10% -1S% Residential -7 -to -17 -25 -17 -42 -711 Rnul -10 .7 -17 -17 -25 -42 0 Total Residential 63 260 323 246 131 377 3,710 Total Retail 'A1 174 715 294 211 495 4.742 Total External Trips 404 634 1,038 530 342 872 9,452 K26 251.. Pa hs,Trip.s KK us -IX1 -^5 .59 -134 -1,186 Total Weekday Trips A % Reduction 316 539 855 455 283 738 7,266 TR,P RATE SOURCE Tnp Ge s"wn (9th Edrbmj. nstoute of Transponaum Fr9neers. 2010 I') 'TE -and Cods shoisn as the first 3 69ts O@ nsal show+ b—ntemal use by Pennon fir 1001suP tad@ M It,P rate visnade 12) .-ana use and density as show+ in the TA for Madison VsaW toy Stowe Er9nesong. Rev June 27. 2013) AM Peak Hour F-nerrtve Tnp Rate, (2-wart v Isstiovia Apsrttlant Townhouse tNT)()T Staunton 1Mtrtct Rate) I )I n n Towshouse I)1 Specuky Retad kst DHOL1404 Pennoni PM Peak Hwy % 1.1s. Daily Weekdax Q-xult) 06 og 65.. h- 0.8 63% it I 0.5 65% 5 K 5.0 56% 44 t Page 28 o M O � `1 % 170 (142) 63 (246) ilk jr 170 (142) 4 430 Entrance %ladison Village 18,460 5(8)0 t� 260 (131) WE* 5 (R) o M — r M 11,780 1' 0 2 ;+ — 3,770 Madison Village Madison Entrance t Village 349(189).p Approximate Site 286 (I55) N Boundary a j Y T * negative volume due to pass -by trips (see y .appendix Figure D3) SITE c 1 1,780I LEGEND 10 STUDY INTERSECTIONS 1 t f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAYADT SITE Road 644) 4,000 0 ^J Y G rl _ _ ao J Papermill Road _ (ROUle 644) 1t 63(91).0 55 (12) r� JUStes N,,e High School iIC O r- _ x % 8603) tfY C. rl o c a�' FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 10 2020 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS onut.; 41,E FREDERICK COUNTY, VA August 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 11 c) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The 2020 background traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours, shown in Figure 11, were determined by adding the 2020 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 10, to the 2020 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 9. d) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 5 and Figure 12 show the anticipated 2020 background lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabouts: single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) This roundabout operates at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. Synchro was used in lieu of SIDRA as the TIS (Traffic Impact Study) for the development that the roundabout is located in (Madison Village TIS by Painter Lewis PLC, June 27, 2013) analyzed it with Synchro as well. In addition, the volumes are minimal and there are no operational issues identified with the LOS conditions, as all analysis years (both background and total) show overall LOS "A" and approach LOS "B" or better for both peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and will experience overall LOS "D" during the PM peak hour, without the site and with the existing lane configuration. 1 Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 30 � I A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach would deteriorate to LOS "E", while the Route 522 northbound and sotrthbotrnd approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). But it isn't a fully single lane approach either because some right turn vehicles are able to utilize the right turn storage lane, however short, to make right turns on red. Because this is an "in-between" situation, HCM analysis skews the results to be better than actual if analyzed as 2 lanes and worse than actual if analyzed as a single lane. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. As a single lane approach and optimized with a 110 second cycle length, the eastbound Papermill Drive queue increases with growth to approximately 750 ft during the PM peak hour. AM queues without the site are at approximately 300 ft, Pennoni assumed right turns on red at approximately I vehicle per cycle. Extending a separate right turn lane on Papermill Road to 325 ft and incorporating right turn overlap phasing for the eastbound right would improve approach LOS to a "C" in the AM and PM peak hours. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure 11 or Table 5 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix E, labeled as "2 Lane EB". The 95`h percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length and the PM LOS is at "E". As mitigation for the 2020 background and the long-term 2026 background scenarios, lengthening the storage to 350 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to- back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 50 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2020 background conditions are included in Appendix E of this report. DHOL1404 Page 31 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' TABLE 5: 2020 BACKGROUND LOS) DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS H Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ t Approach Existing/ Proposed turn -lane 2 lengths (reef) AM Peak (lour PM Peak Hour a LOS � Delay (In sec) Back of a,5 Queue (in feet) 3 LOS � Delay (in sec) Back of t, 5 Qucue (in feet) ' E[3/[.TR A 9.9 50 A 6.2 25 EB LOS A 9.9 A 6.2 WBJLTR A 7.4 50 A 9.7 75 Madison Village R 13 LOS A 7.4 - A 9.7 ' 2 Entrance & Roundabout NB/LTR = A 9.3 25 A 5.8 25 NB LOS A 9.3 - A 5.8 - Mad. Vll. '1 ConvnercialStreet SBrITR A 6.8 25 A 7.0 25 SB LOS A 6.8 _ A 7.0 - Overall = A 8.3 A 8.3 EBfL C 32.5 221 D 53.0 205 EBIR 250 C 29.0 48 D 50.9 55 EB LOS C 30.9 D 52.0 ' NDiL 225 A 8.9 43 A 6.2 104 NBrr A 0.4 91 A 0.2 65 ' 3 Route 522 & Madison Village Signalized NBrC NB LOS A 2.3 A 1.7 SQ.rr [3 14.E 190 A 9.2 239 Entrance SDr( ' SE3IR 275 D 14.0 45 A 9.0 43 SB LOS - 13 14.4 - A 9.1 - Overall 13 14.7 - 13 12.4 - ' EB/LR D 49.9 298 E 71.9 753 EB LOS D 49.9 E 71.9 N13/L 350' C 23.7 130 E 68.3 305 NBrr A 6.3 20 B 14.7 IIS ' Route 522 Signalized NBrr ' 4 Sc Papernnll Road NB LOS - 13 10.9 - C 28.8 - Brr D 19.1 283 D 46.1 486 SBI3rFIrr1t SB LOS - 11 19.1 D 46.1 Overall - C 20.3 - D 46.1 - WI3/I_ 225 C 29.0 115 D 49.9 115 WI3/R C 22.2 77 D 46.2 51 ' NN'B LOS C 24.9 - D 47.8 - Nl3rr f3 12.1 198 A 6.3 192 NBrr _ ' 5 Route 522 &1 Signalized NB/R 325 A 5.5 25 A 2.0 25 N13 LOS - I3 10.4 - A 6.0 - Justes Drive SD/L 4$06 [3 11.1 56 A 3.8 25 SBrT 13 12.7 45 A 0.1 71 ' Sarr S13 LOS - 13 12.1 - A 0.5 - ' Overall 13 13.4 A 7.0 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, S13 = Southbound, L: Lcfl,,riniru, It: Right (2) Turn -Lane lengths do not include taper. All values are approxinnate. ' (3) LOS and Delay values calculated with I ICM methodology using Synchro 8. (4) Signalized intersection 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated using Synchro 8 proprietary nnednodology. Mi ninmmn assunned to be 25 feet. (5) Roundabout 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated with IICM methodology using Synchro 8. (6) Rctriping recommended. DHOL1404 Page 32 Pennani O �_ x �170(142) ♦�63 (246) on170(142) 4 430 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5(8)mv Itf 260 (131) EM10 _ ^ 5 (8) 0% " r V'I M, N Approximate Site Boundary N Y j co S o ( cG e SITE w �I > —-------� Ia I 21,970 LEGEND (D STUDY INTERSECTIONS Itf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AMIPM) IA00 WEEKDAYADT Pap�"tll R� d (Route 23,290 122,29011 i Y 4. N A r N h N.. �. T Y O .�. N N .0 _ = Y Madison Village s Entrance 349 (189) 286 (155) 00 T h a N r Papermill Road ° v i Route 644 1 1 t 131(223).0 197 (418) -t r o� 215 (120) 141(88) Justes Drive tfY_ 0. N o -- tL FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND FIGURE 11 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUM TRAFFIC VOLUMES D1100404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA August '015 0 I I Entrance Madison Village Q Q OVERALL LOS = A (A) 0 = v 'J- N Approximate Site Boundary Ce a � o � I e i SITE J I I �> L---� sill I LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N eagmil► Road (Routo o B (�►) _ d. N C: Cn o ?: a jl o � w l�jJJ Madison Village Entrance C (D) U C (D) .. .. Q a OVERALL LOS = B (B) Fff (D) Y Papermill Road (Route 644) i D (E)* LJ a U d OVERALL B(C) LOS = C (D) * Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' — 65' taper). lustes Drive O B (A) m C (D) e L�=C(D) Justes Drive 0. cVCq _ OVERALL LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2020 BACKGROUND FIGURE 12 • FRAFFICIMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 9110L1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Augwt2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 5. SITE TRIP GENERATION The proposed Freedom Manor site -generated trips were calculated using traffic generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 9`h Edition, 2012, as well as VDOT Staunton District requirements that require 80% of the trips for townhomes and apartments to be calculated using VDOT local rates. The project is planned to be built in two phases, with Phase 1 (2020) consisting of 100 single-family residential dwelling units and Phase 2 (2026) consisting of a mix of 200 townhomes and apartment residential dwelling units. Table 6 shows the weekday AM and PM peak hour and daily trips generated by the proposed project for the two phases, with the values used in the analysis boxed. The values outside the boxes are shown for comparison. DHOL1404 Page 35 Pennoni IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 6: SITE TRIP GENERATION ITF- Land Use (1) 1 ril PIiAK IIOI/R PSI PEAR BOAR 0,111, CODE CODE- DELItSiTY 1�c Ln ff our ZDI:1L L1' O!Q ZOTd1. 2:n'sl4 Trip Generation By Right 210 210190 70 DU Sinsle-Farm DcL (VDOT) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables PIWE 1 (2020) 210 210170 100 DU e SF Res. Oa 100 DU (using EQUATION) 20 60 80 S7 34 91 1.050 210 '-I0100 100 OU Single-Fam. Oct (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD -OUP (2026) 230 230000 200 DU Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 15 73 88 70 34 10-1 1,172 230 230180 40 DU a TH Res @40 DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 231400 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 83 47 130 1,303 Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Peak He. PM Peak Hour Daily F,ffeclive Trip Rates (2,3) MWAY3 a inbown4 r2-waY) Y,Irt and Weekday 210 Single-Fam Det.(\T3(Tf) UU 0.76 25% 1.03 63% 1000 210 SF Res. C 100 DU UU 080 25% 0.91 6354 10.50 A\1i 210 Single-Fam Del. DU 0.75 25% 1.00 63% 9.52 A W. 230 Tounhousc UU n.44 17% 0.52 6794 5.86 230 TIf Res C. 40 DU UU 0.63 16% 0.70 6895 7.23 T—house().DOT Staunton Wirer Rate) UU 0.63 23% 081 6145 8.14 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Tnp Gonaralion Manual (91h Eddlon), Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012. Avemgo lap rates used, unless noted wnh *a*. then equations used at size shawm, with data sot OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SO > 110 % of aw. (1) nE Land Coda shorn as the Amt 3 digits. Decimal shaven for Internal use by Pennonl for lookup lablo for trip rate wariado. (2) Effect— trip rates calculated by land use: For avenge rates = (Density) x (ave. trip ram) = 2-way Trips x (Inbound percentage) for Trips In For ITE equations,'e' noted = (Density) x (trip equation) = 2-way Trips x (Inbound pmernage) for Trips In (3) Assumed 80% of tmwnhousos at Staunton Dslricl effective Rates for townhouse, condo, or apartment. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 36 A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 6. 2020 SITE TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS (PHASE 1) The 2020 site traffic distribution and assignment percentages shown in Figure 13 are derived from the June 2005 TIA for the rezoning application and are as follows: 45% via Route 522 to the north, 35% via Route 522 to the south, and 20% via Papermill Road to the northwest. The 2020 phase I site assignments are shown in Figure 14 for the AM and PM peak hours. All site trips are projected to use the Papermill Road entrance in 2020, as the interparcel connection with Madison Village to the north is not assumed to be open/constructed for initial access. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 37 0 ilk Madison Vilta-e re 20% 45% Approximate Site c� Boundary Y - I � SITE - I r I I slit - ----------------- Road (20%) Site Entrance _ � r= `v z L LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS lit f TURNING MOVEMENTS 10%(10%) Inbound %(Outbound %) N 644) G N _ T y Madison Village I Entrance M O y i. o C ^.L Papermill Road _ ( Route 644) (45%) MO (35%) M"All Justes Drive O IJustes Drier t Y y O ce FREEDOM MANOR 2020 SITE (PHASE 1) FIGURE 13 • TRAI-FIC I4tPACT STUD) TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS D1"1 -I J°' FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Ar gacr 201 O 0 Mattison Village 0 r. 1 210 1 d 480 1 �80 \ Approximate Site r( Boundary I ,I T I SITE I i I r-- I L— -- -- —� SITE80 \I cc 0!/ Y % 12 (7) l � � 48 (27) Site Entrance tf - e LEGEND © STUDY INTERSECTIONS I1 f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,000 WEEKDAYADT N p�ipenrill(,�l Road (Route 1 370 0 O y a vi T � Madison Village I -z Entrance fl ^Cq Cq T J v Papermill Road (Route 644) 1 t 2705).0 21 (12) !-_ Juste= C ni Justes Drive t� x o- cu ry FREEDOM MANOR 2020 SITE (PHASE 1) FIGURE 14 • rRaFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS l,lWL14114 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA lilqust2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 7. ANALYSIS OF 2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS Ia) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' The proposed site -generated trips in 2020, shown on Figure 14 were added to the 2020 background traffic volumes, shown on Figure 12, to obtain 2020 total traffic volumes. Figure 15 shows the 2020 total traffic volumes at the study intersections for weekday AM ' and PM peak hours. ' b) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analyses Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along ' Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 7 and Figure 16 show the anticipated 2020 total lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. ' Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8 and SIDRA for the proposed roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road, ' the following results were observed: Intersection #1: Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Unsignalized: with separate outbound right -turn lane from Site Entrance for capacity purposes; proposed single -lane roundabout in recommendations) Without a roundabout, this intersection operates at overall LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "C" or better during both ' the AM and PM peak hours. ' The northbound Papermill Road approach does not meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane but does meet the threshold for a taper based on PM peak hour volumes. The southbound Papermill Road approach meets the warrant for a left - turn lane based on PM peak hour volumes. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the ' northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, Pennoni updated the access plan to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in this revised TIA, negating the need for ' turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates DHOL1404 Page 40 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' the project volumes with the frill build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. ' The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable approach LOS "A" for the AM peak hour and at an LOS "B" for the PM peak hour. 1 Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial ' Street (Roundabouts: single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) The volumes at this roundabout do not change from 2020 background, and ' therefore, continues to operate at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the AM and PM peak hours. ' Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes I) t This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak ' hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" oi• better during both the AM and PM peak hours. ' Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) ' The intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at overall LOS "D" during the PM peak hour. ' All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "F" while ' the Route 522 northbound and southbound approaches operate at LOS "D". As noted previously, the HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field ' conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and total ' conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. ' For the total conditions, the PM queue with site traffic is increased by approximately 50 ft to 800 ft. AM queues increase to approximately 335 ft; but maintain the approach LOS "D" grade. The PM LOS is at "F" conditions with a 1 Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. ' DHOL1404 Page 41 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 single lane. Overall LOS is at "D" conditions, which reflects the LOS letter grade for the 2020 background conditions. Extending a separate right turn lane on Papermill Road to 325 ft and incorporating right turn overlap phasing for the eastbound right would improve approach LOS to a "C" in the AM peak hour and "D" in the PM peak. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure 16 or Table 7 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix F, labeled as "2 Lane EB". The 95"' percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length. To support the 2020 total and the long-term 2026 total scenarios, lengthening the northbound storage to 425 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to-back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 125 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Although the lengths are different, lengthening the northbound left -turn lanes within the existing pavement is recommended with or without the site. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better. The Synchro 8 and SIDRA worksheets for 2020 Total conditions are included in Appendix F of this report. DHOL1404 Page 42 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TAMP 7- 9.mn TnTAT. T.oS" nF.T.AV & BOO (95%TILE) RESULTS 9 Intersection Traffic Control hnc Group' 1 Approach F.slstlnW 1'ro"e d turn -lane Icnglln' (feet) Ai11 Peak (lour PM Peak (lour LOS � Delay (In sec) [lack of rs Que uc (In feel) I.OS � Delay (In sec) Rack of rs Queue (In feel) Paperrid Road St. Fiervxc Umigul-I WI34- - C IAA 25 D 26.7 25 WDR 100 R 11.5 25 B 11.4 0 s - C 17.0 - C 23.6 - A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 ESIR"'..-OT, A AA 0 A 8.5 0 A 0.0 A 0.0 It 0.1 - A 0.1 - Overall A 1.2 A 0.7 I PapcmtillRoad & Sic Psaraocc IMPROV[Deiha Roundabout WBI-R - A 6.6 25 A 6.1 25 R7t LOS - A 6.6 - A 6.1 - ND'IR - A 8.6 70 A 9.2 80 NIt LOS A 8.6 A 9.2 sarur - A 7.1 43 13 13.4 145 sR I.0S A 7.4 - R 13.4 - Overall - A 8.0 - It 11.4 - 2 Madison Vlllsyre r,nuaruc & Mad. VOL Conn><rcrd Stmct Roundabout: 171 AR - A 9.9 50 1 A 6.2 25 Eft LOS A 99 A 6.2 WTVLI-R - A 7A 50 A 9.7 75 R'[l LOS I A 7.4 - A 9.7 - ND7:Ilt - A 9.3 25 A 5.8 25 NH LOS - A 93 A 5.8 SR,I'IR - A 6.8 25 A 7.0 25 Sit LOS - A 6.8 - A 7.0 Overall - A 83 - A 83 - 3 Rome 522 & \Iadison Vllhge 1•nrarrcc Sigtalicd 0111- - C 32.5 221 D 53.1 205 EDR 250 C 29.0 48 D 51.0 55 E13 LOS - C 309 - D 52.1 NF34" 200 A 8.9 37 A 6.3 106 Nurr - A 0.11 114 A 0.2 73 NR,r - Nil LOS A 23 A 1.7 - SI3? - D 14.G i`)3 A 9.3 249 swr SRR 275 D 14.0 45 A 9.0 43 SR Los 1t 14.5 A 9.2 - Ovcrall 1t 14.6 - 11 123 4 Roue 522 & Papcmull Road Siglalved F.R1R - D 54.4 334 1' 86.2 796 Fit LOS - D 54.4 - F 86.2 - NI34- 425° C 31.9 163 r 83.2 316 ND? A 7.7 25 D 14.5 I I I NIVI' - NR LOS - It 14.2 - D 33.6 - S1111, C 243 315 D 51.9 486 SIVIR Sn LOS C 24.3 D 51.9 Overall C 25.2 - D 53.8 5 Route 522 & Illste-S Dmo Siglalvcd WI3tL 225 C 29.0 115 D 500 115 WI141 - C 22.2 78 D 46.2 52 11,11 LOS C 24.9 D 47.8 NIt? - 11 12.2 201 A 6.4 197 N I3? N13R 325 A 5.5 25 A 2.0 25 Nil LOS - II 10.4 - A 6.0 - SI3lL 375 ° 11 11.0 26 A 4.0 25 SWI- - 11 12.9 25 A 0.1 72 SDrr S❑ LOS - 11 12.2 - A 0.5 - Ovcrall It 13.4 A 7.0 (1) hit - P.asl000n4 Will =wcstoama, ins - nomlw%mo, ins - awln . i ur u, n. m6 (2) Turn -lane Icngdu do not include taper. AU %aloes are appn-te. (3)I.0S and Delay %aloes calculated wrth IIC%l medsodology using S)ncloo R. SIDRA used for roundabout at intersection;$[. (4) S.V b cd onenection 95th percenuk Rack of Queue %akrce calcuhted using prof-mry S)nchro A methodology. \felfrnum assumed to be 25 feet. (5) Unsigulued intersection and mtcmcction 42 roundabout 95d1 percentile [lack of Qucue vahms calculated %vah IICM methodology using S)nerho 8. SIDRA used for roundabout at rtc,acct.n (6) RcuTpmg recommended DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 43 = r, %170(142) *M 63 (246) on 170 (142) 4,4301 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5(8)=0 260 (131) 5(8)E% _—o O 11,620 0 22,220 Approximate Site Boundary s I SITE J r-� I I / L — 1 22,4�0 \ SITE- ,,\. Road x ^ N 12 M ? (7 ) 1 48 (27) Entrance tSite y v � j Ce if 3 — LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS Wit f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I .(1(III WEEKDAY ADT N 644) O T T Tkn Y O a 0 N L Madison Village I tS. Entrance v t 349 (189) 286 (155) N � v x y G N r N Y N Papermill Road _ ( Route 644) 1 t 158(238).0 218 (430) N a x 23,660 Justes Dn 4,760 O % 215 (120) 141 (88) histes Dri,e -_ tf a — FREEDOM MANOR 2020 TOTAL FIGURE 15 TRnr- FICIMPACTSTUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES °"""'°a FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Al"gz vr?015 0 +i<� Entrance Madison Village n OVERALL LOS =A (A) t0 d A (A) d AL Site Entrance L G I' W y E I O a OVERALL r— ! LOS = A (B) N Approximate Site Boundary 1 I I C i SITE ci �I i L---� SITE LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) N Pape ...-- Road (Route h C1 67 p v o °C Madison Village ^ Entrance C (D) U C (D) d d A(A) OVERALL LOS = B (B) O C (D) 1 rr 0 Papermill Road u. (Route 644) D (F)* A � v < B (D) OVERALL LOS = C (D) ' Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' Caper). Justes Drive s (A) � m C (D) p L�=C(D)0 Justes Drive 1 rl OVERALL LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2020 TOTAL FIGURE 16 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS 01111i40' FREDERICK COUNTY, VA aseus12015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 8. ANALYSIS OF 2026 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Background traffic volumes represent future traffic that would travel through the study area intersections without the proposed Freedom Manor development. The background traffic volumes were projected as outlined below. a) Traffic Growth The annual traffic growth rate of 1.5% continued to be used for the 2026 background conditions. The 2026 volumes grown at 1.5% annually are shown in Figure 17. b) Approved / Unbuilt Background Developments No new additional background developments were projected for 2026 background conditions. The background developments used for 2020 background conditions, Madison Village and Frederick County Fourth High School, were also used for 2026 background conditions. Therefore, the 2026 and 2020 background development traffic assignments are identical. The background development traffic assignments are shown again in Figure 18 for continuity. Site assignments for Madison Village will include diversions for access to Papermill Road for the total conditions scenario. Individual background development distributions and assignments, as well as Madison Village Commercial's pass -by assignments are shown in Appendix D of this report (Figures DI-DS). c) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes The 2026 background traffic volumes for the AM and PM peak hours, shown in Figure 19, were determined by adding the 2026 background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 18, to the 2026 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 17. d) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analysis Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 8 and Figure 20 show the anticipated 2026 background lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. DHOL1404 Page 46 Pennoni IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8, the following results were observed: ' Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabout: single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) ' The volumes have not changed from 2020 background conditions and the roundabout continues to operate at overall and approach LOS "A" during both the ' AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn ' lanes') This intersection operates at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak ' hours. ' All approaches continue to operate at LOS "D" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. ' Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and ' degrade to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better during the AM peak hour. During the ' PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach degrades to LOS "F" while the Route 522 southbound approach degrades to LOS "E". ' As noted in the 2020 conditions, HCM analysis results cannot accurately portray field conditions as the EB approach is not a fully 2-lane approach with a minimal EBR storage lane (35 ft with a 65 ft taper). For the background conditions with ' optimization, the AM eastbound queue is at 310 ft while the PM queue as a single lane with right turn on red allowed is estimated at 830 ft. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background and ' total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane ' geometry. Providing a 325 ft right turn lane and right -turn overlap phase would improve AM ' peak hour approach LOS to "C" in the AM peak hour and "D" in the PM peak hour with queues at 250 ft. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 eastbound lanes. Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. ' DHOL1404 Page 47 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 This alternative analysis is not shown in Figure 20 and Table 8 but the Synchro worksheets are included in Appendix G, labeled as "2 Lane EB". For the PM peak, the 95°i percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length. To accommodate the queue, lengthening the available storage to 350 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to-back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 50 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive, which is not an issue for the peak queues. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches operate at LOS "D" or better. The Synchro 8 worksheets for 2026 background conditions are included in Appendix G of this report. DHOL1404 Page 48 Pennoni 0 0 Clltrance Madison Q 10,530 z 1 19,650 19,6�0 \ N Approximate Site Boundary °= N J f � C SITC ,I 1� t---- SITE i 19,650 �I I LEGEND O1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS I t f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,OIIU WEEKDAYADT N (toad 22,340 21,240] N 1 = — N v: x h T y N O Madison Village Entrance It Y iz 5� C- N Papermill Road ) 1 L° (Route 644) 74 (145) 155 (445) � a 'n x Justes Drive 2,930 0 7 x v� c r % 141 (84) 60 (49) Drive tJustes ■� = y FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND GROWTH FIGURE 17 TR\FFICINIPACTSTUDl TRAFFIC VOLUMES D110L1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Reguv1015 M V: �170(142) ♦=63 (246) on170(142) 4,430 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5(8)00 260 (131) 0=10o- 5 (8) o x O x 1 * Madison Village N Approximate Site Y Boundary o x i, SITE - LEGEND Q STUDY INTERSECTIONS tTURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC:AM(PM) 1 000 WEEKDAY ADT GD SITE papenmi11�4) Road (Route Y_ o � Madison \ illage Entrance '1 349(189).0 t 286 (155) � N * negative volume due to pass -by trips 0 ^J Y_ C- N r � � O a Papermill Road (Route 64=4) �I 63(91)00 55(12)� Y _ V lutes Drh, High School E2 0 un M % M ao 86 I4 1 86 143I 1 1 vi � m ern 5 a ago o r` e rY o — FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 18 a TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDI TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS D11OL1 Jn.) FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Awgust 2111' I-- _ _ x %M 170 (142) ilk 4000063 (246) Af 170 (142) 4,4301 Entrance Madison Village 8,460 5()mo 260 (131) EM010, 5 (8) _ z ,7, �r r_ 12,310 0 24,620 23,420 Approximate Site Boundary = 1 SITE r-- I I j 23 650 SITE Pape,mill Road (Route 12,310 LEGEND O STUDY INTERSECTIONS ■tf TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,UUII WEEKDAYADT N d N h N T N N N T r! 7 Madison Village t Entrance 349 (189).p It 286 (155) !at le Le y C N � N� O x Papermill Road j 1 LE — (Route 644) 1 t 137(235).0 210 (456) � i T O v I%= 227 (127) 146 (92) Drive tJustes .1 L FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 19 • FRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC VOLUMES OHOL14 4 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA August 2015 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 8: 2026 BACKGROUND LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS H Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ 1 Approach Existing/ Proposed turn -lane r lengths (feet) A11 Peak (lour PN1 Peak (lour a LOS 1 Delay (in sec) Back of 4 5 Qucuc (in feet) 3 LOS � Delay (in sec) Back of 4,5 Queue (in feet) 2 Madison Village Entrance 3c Mad. Vll. Coniniercial Street Roundabout EB/LTR A 9.9 50 A 6.2 25 Eta LOS A 9.9 - A 6.2 - WB/LIR A 7A 50 A 1 9.7 75 WB LOS A 7.4 - A 9.7 - NB/L'[R - A 9.3 25 A 5.8 25 NB LOS A 9.3 - A 5.8 - SM IR A 6.9 25 A 7.0 25 SB LOS A 6.8 - A 7.0 - Overall A 8.3 - A 8.3 - 3 Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance Signalized EB/L - C 33.6 226 D 53.6 205 EB/R 250 C 29.8 59 D 51.0 55 EB LOS - C 31.9 - D 52.5 - NB/L 225 A 9.2 110 A 6.7 123 NB/I A 0 A 205 A 0.2 163 NBn' NB LOS - A 2.3 - A 1.7 - SM' 13 14.9 198 A 9.5 273 SB/I' - SWR 275 B 13.9 43 2% 9.0 43 SB LOS - 13 14.7 - A 9.3 - Overall 13 14.7 - B 12.2 - 4 Route 522 & Papclnnll Road Signalized EB/LR D 53.0 310 1. 95.8 831 EB LOS - D 53.0 - 1, 95.8 - NB/L 350' C 30.1 170 F 91.4 349 NB/1' - A 7.3 27 B 15.9 161 NBff NB LOS - 13 13.4 - D 35.9 - SBfF C 20.2 335 E 71.6 535 S WIT2 SB LOS C 20.2 - E 71.6 - Overnll - C 22.2 - E 64.2 - 5 Route 522 & Jastcs Drive Signalized WBA_ 225 C 33.1 138 D 49.4 119 WB/R - C 24.2 89 D 46.0 69 WB LOS C 27.7 - D 47.5 - NBff 13 11.9 206 A 6.8 216 NBff - NB/R 325 1% 5.6 26 A 2.0 25 NB LOS - B 10.3 - A 6.4 - SB/L 4506 B 11.9 25 A 4.3 25 S B/f B 12.6 25 r1 0.0 108 S Bff SB LOS B 12.3 - A 0.6 - Overall - 13 13.9 - A 7.0 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, S13 = SOUmbOund, L: Lett, 1 :1 fin], K: Mgul (2) Turn -Lune lengths do not include taper. All values are approximate. (3) LOS and Delay values calculated with HCM methodology using Synchro 8. (4) Siglalized intersection 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated using Synchro 8 proprietary medhodology. Minimum assumed to be 25 feet. (5) Synchro 8 ulsignalized intersection and intersection 02 roundabout 95th percentile Back of Queue values calculated with HCM methodology using Synchro 8. (6) Retriping recommended. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 52 O e 2 3 +i<� Entrance E� Madison Village Approximate Site v; Boundary 0 OVERALL y� LOS = A (A) -�' I a Ls i SITE ° I I /, SITE J —____ - ___—__--'__—_ O aal LEGEND QQ STUDY INTERSECTIONS LANE GEOMETRY STOP SIGN TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) GD papermi11 goad (,, Q < aell cc: z Madison Village _ ^ ^ Entrance A C (D) U C(D) E d 4 d A (A) OVERALL LOS —B(B) W VNi U T v 7 � Papermill Road L (Route 644) 4.I Q B �) OVERALL LOS = C (E) ' Analyzed as one lane approach because of short right turn storage (35' + 65' taper). Justes Drive O B (A) m m �j C (D) A C (D) U t�= • Justes Drive o OVERALL B7) LOS = B (A) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 20 • TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY TRAFFIC CONDITIONS DH0 I40{ FREDERICK COUNTY. VA lueast '01: 1 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 9. ANALYSIS OF 2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS Ia) Daily and Peak Hour Traffic Volumes ' The interparcel connection between the Freedom Manor and Madison Village to the north was assumed to be open for 2026 total conditions, giving trips for both developments a choice between two entrances. Consequently, Madison Village and Freedom Manor traffic ' assignments needed to be altered. The resulting 2026 background development traffic assignments with the interparcel connection, which includes the high school trips that don't need to be modified, are shown in Figure 21. Figure D5 and Figure D6 in Appendix D ' show the distribution and assignment percentages, and trip assignments, respectively, for only the Madison Village development with the interparcel connection with Freedom Manor. ' The 2026 background growth traffic volumes, shown in Figure 17, were added to the 2026 � background development traffic assignments, shown in Figure 21, to get 2026 background ' traffic volumes with the interparcel connection, in Figure 22. ' As shown in Table 9, Phase 2 of the proposed Freedom Manor development adds additional site trips to the road network. Also, as noted above, the trip assignments need to be altered as a result of the interparcel connection with Madison Village. As shown on ' Figure 23, the estimated regional distributions stay the same with 45%, 35%, and 20%, via Route 522 to the north, Route 522 to the south, and Papermill Road to the northwest, respectively. However, the site traffic assignments at the intersections were modified, with ' 35% of Freedom Manor trips estimated to utilize the Madison Village Entrance on Route 522. Site build -out trips assigned using the modified traffic assignments to obtain 2026 site (build -out) traffic assignments in Figure 24. ' The 2026 background traffic volumes with the interparcel connection, shown in Figure 22, were added to the 2026 site (build -out) traffic assignments, shown in Figure 24, to arrive at 2026 total traffic volumes with the subject site, in Figure 25. r Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 54 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 9: SITE TRIP GENERATION 1TF- land LSr (1) 1 AM PEAK lDUR Pdf PEAR /LOUR Q Il6Y CQP, conE DE�1'IT Lac. LM !A' QH WLIL 41'. D1CL Tom !L-txc71 Trip Generation By Right 210 210190 70 DU Single -Fain Dut. (VDOT) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables PHASE 1 (2020) 210 210170 100 DU a SF Res. a 100 DU (using EQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 11050 210 210100 100 DU Single-Fam. Det (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD -OUT (2026) 230 2300M 200 Du Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 15 73 88 70 34 1&1 1,172 230 230180 40 DU a TH Res @40 DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 290 231410 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 83 47 130 1,303 Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Peak He. PM Peak Hour Daily Effectia,e Trip Rates (2,3) (2xay) %I"hnyap n-way) %inbound Weekday 210 Single-Fam Dcl. (V M DU 0.76 25% 1.00 635: 10.00 210 SF Res. Ca, IM DU DU 0.80 25% 0.91 63% 10.50 A\P. 210 Single-Fam Oct. DU 0.75 25% 1.00 63% 9.52 W1 230 Townhouse DU 0..1 17% 0.52 67,. 5.86 Jo TH Res rd 40 DU DU 0.63 16% 0.70 689: 7.25 Tnwlth..ic (VDOT Staumon Duma Rate) DU 0.63 23% 0.81 6P: 9.14 TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (91h Edition), institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012. A%mgo trip rates used, unless noted xith W, then equations used at size shaven, with data set OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SO > 110 % of ave. (1) ITE Land Code shaven as the first 3 di9ds. Decimal shw.n for internal use by pennon) for tookup table for trip rate s diible. (2) Effective trip rates calculated by land use: For avenge ntca = (Density) x (ave. trip rate) = 2-way Trips x (Inbound page) for Trips In For ITE equacon s,'e' noted = (Density) x ( trip equidon) = 2-yny Tnps x (Inbound percentage) for Tnps In (3) Assumed 80% of townhouses at Staunton District effective Ralos for townhoueo, condo, or apartment. Per oM �n x a M %Id5(121) 40�51 (197) ilk Af M 145 (121) 3,5401 Entrance Madison Vlllagc 7,010 � 39 (29) t 208 (1115) 0011. 39 (29) T r o r� a O M �n ,rr' M I O �x 81 (43) r -r �27(Id) Entrance tSite ■ — rl rl it 4,970 I p0 CC. l 2,320 Madison Village Approximate Site Boundary _ G i• SITE I srrE � 2,550 P,Jpermill(,Id) Road lKOutc I A50 LEGEND (D STUDY INTERSECTIONS It f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,0(10 WEEKDAYADT 2,860 1 rl o L• Madison Village Entrance 349 (189). 178 (98) 2 1 °C �I * negative volume due to pass -by trips (sec Appendix Figure D3) 4 Ij G ri .7 h ri n 21 J llapermill Road 11 �2 (ROnte 644) t 16(23). .M.. ri rl Justes Drive High School 2,o8u O P 86 (43) 1 � � 86 (a3) Justes Drive J G ry — rl fq a FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND DEVELOPMENT FIGURE 21 TR:�rEtc l vlh:�rr s r(mv TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS 0110 1104 w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA ill'ttn! '1115 oM� z Mi rl % 145 (121) M SI (197) on145(121) 3,5401 Entrance Madison Villaee 7,010 208 (105) mmoll- 39 (29) x M in M 112,3101 K r1 o r r" K 81 (43) 1 � 27 (14) Site Entrance i SITE 24.620 21,970 Approximate Site Boundary 1I t� JL SITF j 22,200 "-l'l'll`� 1,460 _ J paperm111614) lZllall (lt Ulltl: 4 1 1.580 LEGEND OI STUDY INTERSECTIONS N1 f TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) (k 1,000 ; WEEKDAYADT 1 v, x �V 1 L• Nladi'so❑ Village Gntrancc 349 (189) 178 (98) -rr a � C x K 'J Papermill Road L 1 (Route 644) Al t 90(167). 237 (471) v x M r rl r` Justly pt 5,010 rl 1(, 227 (127) a M 1 � � 146 (92) Justes Drive :l a NJ � r L' FREEDOM MANOR 2026 BACKGROUND FIGURE 22 Tlz:�rrlc I�1P:�rr tinlDv TRAFFIC VOLUMES M10 L!r„ w/ INTERPARCEL CONNECTION FREDERICK COUNTY, VA In,quu'olS 0 Entrance Madison Village I (35%) mm► MN 20% 0 Site Entrance �rt N .-r J If, Y "J 7 "- LEGEND QI STUDY INTERSECTIONS v 1'f TURNING MOVEMENTS 10%(10%) Inbound %(Outbound %) 45% Approximate Site Boundary I I � SITE r- I I SITE p,ll,cnnv116a tl Road( Rout=_ 35% J. y o 1 'Madison Village E• nurance (30%,) .0 It (5%) n 1 rl y �!l r y Papermill Road (RUUIe 64 4) � t (I5'%). (30'%) c JUstes Urine O �n 1 JUstes Drive t 1 ^J L• � FREEDOM MANOR 2026 SITE (BUILD -OUT) FIGURE 23 TRAFf"IC Ihn'ACTSIUDY TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTIONS ""OLlO! FREDERICK COUNTY, VA au4ov 2015 I 0 d %= JA♦� -7)-3-01 I G (5G) Entrance Madison Villaue 930 56 (32) mmo� m% H 1 530 1 }2 (18) 73 (41) Site Entrance t� srt �rt ,N i1 1,190 1 530 ri Approximate Site ^ 13oun(tary 3 -� CL G i I � i SITE J L r-- i i � i ----..� SITE 530 hapormllll 44) Road (Route 1,190 LEGEND QI STUDY INTERSECTIONS Ia TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,000 WEEKDAYADT 1 930 � 930 ri G 7 J 1 G r� ^I. K 7 r � c � Madison Village 1 = Gnu' °48 (27) r� K 1^1 G r� y r� n Papcnnill Road (Route 644) 'fit 24(14).0 IS (27) r� 1 Justes Drive t G rl �n �n ^ N L FREEDOM MANOR 2026 SITE (BUILD -OUT) FIGURE 24 TRAI:FIC I&II)ACTSTUDY TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS W/0040" FREDERICK COUNTY, VA .Iq¢u.v_015 In %145 (121) _ 40=167 (252) Ar 145 (121) 4,4701 Entrance Madison Village 7,940 39(29)mv 263 (136) t-0. x 0 39 (29) 0% r' M M if In M 1 0 1 0 � o % 113 (61) 91) Site Entrance t� � V x 25.810 22,500 Approximate Site fl ^ Boundary 0 J 1 SITE r-- I ,> I j 22,730 SITE [toad Utoutc 12.770 LEGEND OI STUDY INTERSECTIONS � t TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) iH I,000 WEEKDAYADT 26.130 25,030 fl :1 G 0 1 M �O rl y L L• Madison Village Entrance 1 t 397(216).0 186 (102) r o x r �i a — Y Y r c � Papermill Road (Route 644) 'fit 114(181).0 285 (498) r- ,v 1 T rl r` Justc 5,010 O M N Y 227 (127) 146 (92) Justes Drive t 1 N - x r L• FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 25 rR.�l rIc IMP:�c r sruD� TRAFFIC VOLUMES FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Juguw 2015 IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Ib) Capacity Analysis and Queuing Analyses Per VDOT TIA preparation guidelines, existing heavy vehicle percentages were entered into the Synchro 8 analysis for the Route 522 & Papermill Road intersection and interpolated for the other study intersections. Also, the default approach PHF (Peak Hour ' Factor) of 0.92 was used unless the existing PHF was greater. The three signals along Route 522 were coordinated and optimized using Synchro 8. Table 10 and Figure 26 show the anticipated 2026 total scenario lane geometry, intersection traffic control, and ' AM and PM peak hour Levels of Service (LOS) at the study intersections. Using 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) analysis methodology, calculated with Synchro 8 and SIDRA for the proposed roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road, the following results were observed: IIntersection #1: Papermill Road & Site Entrance (Roundabout) ' The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable approach LOS "A" for the AM peak hour and at an overall LOS "B" in the PM peak, with all approaches operating at an LOS "C" or better. Intersection #2: Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Street (Roundabouts: single lane with 1 10 ft inscribed diameter) This roundabout continues to operate at overall LOS "A" during both the AM and ' PM peak hours. All approaches operate at LOS "B" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. HCS 2010 LOS was utilized since operations are generally below capacity and the location is off -site on a local street. Intersection #3: Route 522 & Madison Village Entrance (Signalized: with turn lanes) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during both the AM and PM peak hours. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better during both the AM and PM peak hours. Intersection #4: Route 522 & Papermill Road (Signalized) This intersection operates at overall LOS "C" during the AM peak hour and at overall LOS "E" during the PM peak hour, with or without the site. The eastbound approach operates at LOS "E" during the AM peak hour. During the ' PM peak hour, with or without the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach Assumed per Madison Village General Development Plan by Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., July 2, 2013. ' DHOL1404 Page 61 Pennoni IA Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 ' continues to operate at LOS "F" while the Route 522 southbound approach operates at LOS "E". ' For the AM peak, the overall delay increases from LOS "D" to LOS "E" with the peak hour queues increasing from 310 feet to 352 feet with the site and as a single ' lane approach. For the PM peak without improvements, the LOS "F" delay increases the queues slightly from 831 feet to 840 ft with the site. This revised TIA analysis shows the conditions without the right turn pocket for existing, background ' and total conditions to measure the approach LOS. HCM 2000 methodology was utilized for this analysis because HCM 2010 computation does not support the lane geometry. ' For the total conditions, the lane is not shown in the LOS graphics, to gauge the change of site traffic. For long-term conditions, the LOS is shown as an alternative ' with a 325 ft long extension of the right turn lane (with 100 ft taper) and a right turn overlap phase to verify queues adequately. HCM 2010 methodology was utilized for this alternative analysis since the computation supports the lane geometry with 2 ' eastbound lanes. ' As shown in Table 10, the overall AM peak LOS improves from LOS "E" to LOS "C" with the turn lane and side street queues reduced to approximately 310 ft. However, these improvements are not proposed directly with this subject ' application, since the site trips at this signal are only 2.8 percent of the short-term traffic volumes on Papermill Road, and only 5.4 percent for the long-term conditions, as shown in Table 9A below. TABLE 9A: SITE IMPACT AT PAPERMILL ROAD L L Approach Site Trips Total Volumes Site Impacts 2020 PM Peak Hour EASTBOUND RIGHT Papennill Rd 12 430 2.8% EASTBOUND Papennill Rd 27 668 4.1 % NORTHBOUND Route 522 20 1020 2.0% SOUTHBOUND Route 522 26 964 2.7% TOTALI 73 2653 2.7% 2026 PM Peak Hour EASTBOUND RIGHT Papennill Rd 27 498 5.4% EASTBOUND Papennill Rd 41 678 6.0% NORTHBOUND Route 522 56 1 135 4.9% SOUTHBOUND Route 522 28 983 2.9% TOTAL 125 2796 4.5% Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 62 A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 With site impacts at less than 6 percent of the future traffic and the off -site improvements required to mitigate background conditions, the requirement to install as part of the Freedom Manor rezoning is not justified. The 95" percentile queue for the northbound left -turn would exceed the existing storage length. To provide additional stacking, lengthening the storage to 425 ft from 300 ft is recommended. The taper for the northbound left is currently back-to- back with the taper for the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Therefore, restriping would take 125 ft off the southbound left storage at Justes Drive. Although the lengths are different, lengthening the northbound left -turn lanes is recommended with or without the site. Intersection #5: Route 522 & Justes Drive (Signalized) This intersection continues to operate at overall LOS "B" during the AM peak hour and at LOS "A" during the PM peak hour. All approaches continue to operate at LOS "C" or better. The Synchro 8 and SIDRA worksheets for 2026 Total conditions are included in Appendix H of this report. DHOL1404 Page 63 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 10: 2026 TOTAL LOS, DELAY & BOQ (95%TILE) RESULTS 0 Intersection Effie Control hnc GrouIJ Approach Eslsling/ Proposed turn -lane lengtlu' (reel) ANI Peak (lour l 'M Peak Ilour , L0S ) Delay (in sec) Back of as Qucuc (In feel) s I.OS � Delay (in sec) Back of a,s Qucuc (in feet) I Papcnmll Road & Sic Eurance RelIIY1RoundaboutN9/IR WIVI-R - A 9.4 33 A 7.7 25 PI'II 110S - A 9.4 A 7.7 - - A 8.9 65 13 12.1 103 N I3 1.05 A 8.9 II 12.1 - SI3'LT - A 8.4 50 C 18.0 205 SI31,0S - A AA - C I8.0 - Ownll - A 8.8 - 11 14.8 2 \ladison Village Frnrurnc Road & Mad. Vtll. Con-c.W Street Roundabout F1111R - B 10.9 75 A 6.7 25 KIS LOS II 10.9 A 6.7 WIVUFR - A 7.5 50 A 9.7 75 VPIi LOS - A 7.5 - A 9.7 - NIL71i - A 9:1 25 A 5.9 25 IN LOS A 9.4 A 5.9 SB11-1R - A 6.9 25 A 7.1 25 SI1110S A 6.9 A 7.1 O,cnll - A 8.8 A 8.3 3 Route 522 & lladison Vgllgc Finnncc Sigml-d liltl. - C 33.3 245 D 52.5 227 H R 250 C 21.5 aft D 43.5 44 EIS LOS C 29.5 1) 49.6 NIVL 200 A 9.6 25 A 6.4 51 NRT - A 0.5 172 A 0.2 HG NIT - ND I.OS A 1.8 A 1.2 swr - 11 15.5 201 A 9.3 275 SIVI- _ S11R 275 11 14.7 44 A 9.2 45 SI11105 IS 15.3 - A 9.3 0,en1I - Is 14.1 - 11 11.4 4 Routc 522 & Papc,,tA Read sik7ulved F132R - 1'. 56.5 352 1: 114.8 840 VAI 110S E 56.5 - F II4.8 NIIL 4256 D 35A 194 1' 100.0 406 Nwr - A 8.5 36 IF 13.6 117 Nwr- N11 LOS - I4 16.3 - 1)40.8 - swr C 73.2 328 li 70.3 520 sBVlx - SB I.OS C 33.2 F, 70.3 - Ownll - C 29.8 E 69.6 4 Route 522 & Papemr1l Road SiVmtU d Ahenutisa,sah Ill Rion Turn Lane Gacnston-I Osvrt,p Phase HILL - C 27.5 100 C 27.7 145 1111t 325 C 33.7 123 1: fr1.7 307 Ell LOS C 31.9 - D 54.8 - NII'L 300 13 15.5 65 C 24.4 195 Nwr - 13 13.5 25 A 3.2 25 Nwr - NB LOS 11 14.1 A - SWr - C 25.3 J7 C 272 SBIIR - C 25.3 C SIS LOS - C 25.3 C d33.5 O,en11 C 21.5 C - 5 Rmac 522 & )castes Iris Siv,,lvcd WRL 225 C 33A I38 D 119 WI193 - C 24.2 91 D 73 R73 LOS - C 27.7 1) 47.5 IVF - 11 12.0 206 A 7.0 234 NIT NISR 325 A 5.6 27 A 2.0 25 N 13 LOS - B 10.1 - A 6.6 SI1'L 375 ' II 12.1 25 A 4.5 25 swr D 13.0 25 A 0.0 ftft s11rr - SIs I,OS I3 12.7 A 0.6 - O,enu - B 14.0 - n 7.0 - (1) EB = Eastbn at4 Wit -Wcstbonna, Nt3 a n'tatnt-1, att = �Mtnnnano, t,: tell, t: t nnt, n: night (2) l't 13m kngdu do rwt itehtde taper. AD,ahtes arc appruamute. (3)LOS aril Det,y,alues cakuhtnJ tegh HCV rnedx.fubgy tumg Synchro X. SIDRA used for mundaNan at inersectku, oil. (4) Sig-nah'cJ mterscction 95dt pctncnWc Back of Qucuc sabres cakul,mJ u'vig prulxictary Synchm N nwth«lukgry. Afitmntm asnmuJ m be 25 feet. (5) Unsigmlind ntcrscctiun and mt-ectiut 02 muxUbmt 950t perccntik Back of Qucuc thies cskul,ted wnh IICM madunlokgy tuirg Syncrhu H. SIDR % used for ruu 615o t at encrscctixt cal. (6) Rctr mg recurna-ded. DHOL1404 Page 64 Pennoni 0 I Entrance M8dIti0I1 VIIIiIgC i OVERALL LOS - A (A) U Site Entrance 72 C -rtr = m J _N OVERALL LOS -A(13) Approximate Site ^ 13Oundaly 0 SITE I J LEGEND O1 STUDY INTERSECTIONS UpLANE GEOMETRY " STOP SIGN ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL • ROUNDABOUT O A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) SI'hE p"WC1,1nillO44) Road (Roof'` 0 _ rl r� rj r'1 CG 7 .J � Iv/I (JI c+\It c'II�/Ily i /Ily L• Nladison Village Entrance C (1)) ^ U C (D) = i A (A) OVERALL LOS -13(1.3) G f:l U ^ o' •_ o Papermill Road L• 0 (Route 644) W � m 13 (D) OVI?BALL LOS - C (F) « Analyzed as one lane approach because ot'short I ight turn stora!!c (35' • 65' taper). When analyzed as taco Inner, o-c"11 PNI 1:13 approach LOS "D". See Tablc 10 for details. Tastes Drit'e L�=C(D)m q uust es Drive (JJJ ri i i llVl•.KALL LOS -13(A) FREEDOM MANOR 2026 TOTAL FIGURE 26 TTIZ:\EFIC livtl>AC-FS-I('D}' TRAFFIC CONDITIONS W/ 1'1'0' FREDERICK COUNTY, VA Iu,glly p15 A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 10. TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS 2020 and 2026 total volumes at the Papermill Road & Site Entrance intersection were analyzed for left and right -tuns lane warrants found in the VDOT Road Design Manual, if a conventional at -grade intersection were pursued for the site access. ' As shown in Table 11, the 2020 total traffic volumes do not meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane on the northbound Papermill Road approach but the PM peak hour volumes meet for a taper. As shown in Table 12, the 2026 total traffic volumes in the PM ' peak hour meet the warrant for a full -width right -turn lane on the northbound Papermill Road approach. ' As shown in Table 13, the 2020 total volumes for the PM peak hour meet the warrant for a left -turn lane on the southbound Papermill Road approach. As shown in Table 14, the 2026 total volumes for both the AM and PM peak hours meet the warrant for a left -turn ' lane on the southbound Papermill Road approach. Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the ' northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in this revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout ' justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out ' of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. DHOL1404 Page 66 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 11: RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) Papermill Road at Site Entrance Northbound Right -Turn Lane 120 100 trr :::,.::-.-' �rULI-Vl:DTH TUf1N LAN AND TAt'CR RLOUIRCO1, O z iu — y ................ in CO . •: TAPEn nZOUMED cc. '::.•: 20 S4 ii Zr ::.:_ : _ .L-VDTs r.zr�F�rcn± — --40 100 260 300 400 _00 70 PItV APPACACH TOTAL, WAUClE:;i f'IJI HOUR A,pF7DP,63*� R.;rdics .-1 .•'I and Enr-rar„-s ,:C,:mmerc al cc lai c Peak Hour: AM PM Papermill Road NB Approach Total 471 VPH 500 VPH Right Turns 16 VPH 46 VPH % Right Turns 3.4% 9.1% Right Turn Lane Warrant - Not Satisfied, Only Taper Required LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume egmva10110 Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph. PHI/ right turns • •10. and PHV total - 300 Adjusted right turns = PHV Rrghl Timis - 20 If PHV is not known use formula PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of Wilk in the peak deer -ion of flovi Hole An average of I I'. for K x D will suffrco FIGURE 3.26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) DHOL1404 Page 67 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 11: RIGHT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) Papermill Road at Site Entrance Northbound Right -Turn Lane 120 1 u0 I _ nu-wOSM nM UM rwo TAM61 MOLN 1� R ! Y 3 90 TAPfP RECI HIED i£ 40 NO TT KN IX%E5 410 ou -260 aoo .ae wo M P"V APPROACH TWAL. VV*cL" PER HOUR T - _ . ri3tie Bads re-clii—ed art all ImtwPsectio s and Entrances ICcrnmercta c r =*t-va* Peak Hour: AM PM Papermill Road NB Approach Total 471 VPH 500 VPH Right Turns 16 VPH 46 VPH % Right Turns 3.4% 9.1% Right Turn Lane Warrant - Not Satisfied, Only Taper Required PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent, Adjustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 45 mph, PHV right turns - 40, and PHV total . 300 Adjusted right lunis = PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note An average of 111. for K x D will suffice FIGURE 3-26 GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) DHOL1404 Page 67 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 13: LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2020 TOTAL CONDITIONS) 2020 Build -out Conditions Papermill Road & Site Entrance ' Papermill Road Southbound Left -Turn VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX F TABLE 3-1: WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON 2 LANE HWY ' OPPOSING VOLUME (Vo) Kph ADVANCING VOLUME (Va) \ph SPEED (MPH) 50 50 50 50 ' LEFT TURN % 5% 10% 20% 30% 350 800 280 210 165 135 420 600 350 280 195 170 540 400 410, 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 ' Calculations AM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 471 VPH 332 VPH 1.2% 4 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for ' y DELTA 71 540 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -80 -28 ' Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 1.2% 540 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 5% -110 -27 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 540 -28 -27 Va warrant = 485 versus actual 332 ' OK, NOT WARRANTED Calculations PM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 501 VPH 652 VPH 1.7% 11 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 101 540 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo ' y INCRM 20D -120 -61 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 1.7% 540 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS ' x INCRM 5% -70 -24 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 540 -61 -24 Va warrant = 456 versus actual 652 ' WARRANTED Figure Sourco: VDOT Road Deslgn Manual, Calculations by Nnnoni Peak Hour: AM PM ' Left Turns 4 VPH 11 VPH % Left Turns 1.2% 1.7% Advancing Volume (Papermill Rd SB Approach) 332 VPH 652 VPH ' Opposing Volume (Papermill Rd NB Approach) 471 VPH 501 VPH SIB Left Turn Lane Warrant - Satisfied ' DHOL1404 Page 6-9Pennoni ' A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 TABLE 14: LEFT -TURN LANE WARRANT ANALYSIS AT SITE ENTRANCE (2026 TOTAL CONDITIONS) 2026 Build -out Conditions Papermill Road & Site Entrance ' Papermill Road Southbound Left -Turn VDOT ROAD DESIGN MANUAL APPENDIX TABLE 3-1: WARRANTS FOR LEFT TURN LANES ON 2 LANE HWY ' OPPOSING VOLUME (Vo) Kph ADVANCING VOLUME (Va) Kph SPEED (MPH) 50 50 50 50 ' LEFT TURN % 5% 10% 20% 30% 800 280 210 165 135 600 350 280 �4% 195 170 400 430 320 240 210 200 550 400 300 270 100 615 445 335 295 ' Calculations AM PEAK if Va L % L Vo 441 VPH 357 VPH 16.0% 57 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for ' y DELTA 41 320 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo y INCRM 200 -40 -8 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Della of Va for ' x DELTA 6.0% 320 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 10% -80 A8 y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 320 -8 -48 Va warrant = 264 versus actual 357 ' WARRANTED Calculations PM PEAK-400- if Va L % L Vo 542 VPH 724 VPH 13.8% 100 VPH Opposing Volumes Chart Incremental Delta of Va for y DELTA 142 320 ACTUAL y INCREMENT FOR Vo ' y INCRM 200 -40 -28 Advancing Volumes Chart Volume Delta of Va for x DELTA 3.8% 320 ACTUAL x INCREMENT FOR % LEFTS x INCRM 10% -80 -30 ' y INCREMENTx INCREMENT ADJUSTED Va WITH Vo, % LEFTS Va 320 -28 -30 Va warrant = 261 versus actual 724 WARRANTED Figure Source: VDOT Road Design Manual, Calculations by Pannonl Peak Hour: AM PM LeftTums 57 VPH 100 VPH ' % Left Turns 16.0% 13.8% Advancing Volume (Papermill Rd SB Approach) 357 VPH 724 VPH Opposing Volume (Papermill Rd NB Approach) 441 VPH 542 VPH ' SB Left Turn Lane Warrant - Satisfied ' DHOL1404 Page 70 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 11. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed subject development and the evaluation of 2014 existing conditions, 2020 background conditions, 2020 total conditions, 2026 background conditions, and 2026 total conditions, it was found that the surrounding roadway network can adequately accommodate the proposed site densities. The conclusions and recommendations are summarized as follows: a) Trip Generation The proposed development would be built in two phases. Phase 1 is planned for initial site access for the single-family residential community with access to Papermill Road and would generate 1,050 daily trips, 80 trips during the AM peak hour, and 91 trips during the PM peak hour. Build -out of the project with access to Madison Village is projected to generate a total of 2,643 daily trips, 206 trips during the AM peak hour, and 249 trips during the PM peak hour. b) Intersections Papermill Road (Route 644) & Site Entrance This unsignalized intersection is proposed to be built as a roundabout with Phase 1 of the project for primary site access. Phase 2 of the project would introduce Madison Village trips as well with the proposed interparcel connection. The intersection as a roundabout will operate at acceptable overall LOS "B" under both Phase 1 and Phase 2 conditions, with approach LOS at "C" or better conditions. Without a roundabout, the westbound approach out of the site during the 2026 PM peak hour is projected to operate at LOS "E" primarily, due to the high through volumes on Papermill Road. There were no projected queueing issues. Signalization is not anticipated to be warranted at the site entrance. Without a roundabout, a southbound Papermill Road left -turn lane and a northbound Papermill Road right -turn taper would be warranted with 2020 total PM peak hour volumes. The left -turn lane would be warranted with both AM and PM peak hour volumes under 2026 peak hour volumes. In addition, the 2026 PM peak hour volume would meet the warrant for a full - width right -turn lane. DHOL1404 Page 71 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Because a left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, Pennoni has engaged several iterations of alternatives including reviewing minimum left turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication would be available. As noted in previous meetings with VDOT, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) would not support partial dedications or easements to allow the Papermill Road widening to be shared between the property owners at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit the turn lane improvements along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even an option with a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported by the adjacent property owner's representatives. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as T intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes not proposed with this revision. Madison Village Entrance Road & Madison Village Commercial Streets This proposed roundabout, to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "A" for all peak hours and analysis years. The roundabout was modeled as single -lane, with single -lane approaches and an inscribed diameter of 110 ft. Since this was an internal intersection off -site to Freedom Manor, the LOS is based on the HCM methodology as used in the Madison Village Traffic Study but updated with revised traffic volumes with Freedom Manor. Madison Village Entrance Road & Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) This proposed signalized intersection, also to be built with and by the Madison Village project, is projected to perform at overall LOS "B" for all peak hours and analysis years with approach LOS "D" or better. There were no projected queueing issues with the turn lane storage lengths suggested in this TIA. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Papermill Road This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "B" in the AM peak hour and LOS "C" in the PM peak hour. During the PM peak hour, the eastbound Papermill Road approach operates at LOS "D". DHOL1404 Page 72 Pennoni A Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 Under 2020 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate to LOS "E" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D". Under 2026 background conditions without the subject site, the eastbound approach would deteriorate further to LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "E". Under 2020 total conditions with the site, the eastbound Papermill Road approach will operate at LOS "F" during the PM peak hour with overall intersection LOS "D" without improvements. Under 2026 total PM conditions, the overall intersection LOS would be an "E". To alleviate the undesirable LOS without the site and address eastbound and northbound queueing during the future analysis years, the following improvements are recommended, regardless of the subject site rezoning: 1. Lengthen the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn pocket, currently about 35 ft, to 325 ft. Due to the short existing turn lane, the LOS was shown without a separate turn lane in the revised analysis. 2. Incorporate an eastbound right -turn overlap phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase into the signal timing. 3. Lengthen northbound Route 522 northbound left -turn pocket by restriping the center lane on Route 522, currently about 300 ft, to 425 ft. With these recommended improvements, the overall intersection LOS would improve to "C" or better and the right -turn storage would be sufficient for 95"' percentile queues for the critical 2026 PM peak hours. Approach LOS would also improve to LOS "D" or better. Site impacts are negligible at the signal, at 2.7 percent of the intersection's total hourly traffic volume in the 2020 PM peak hour and 4.5 percent in the 2026 PM peak hour, with the PM peak hour being considered because it was worse than the AM peak hour. So off -site right turn lane (construction) is not recommended with site development. The site is providing Papermill Road improvements at its entrance. Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & Justes Drive This signalized intersection currently operates at overall LOS "A" in both peak hours, with all approach LOS at "B" or better. DHOL1404 Page 73 Pennons A Traffic Impact Analvsis for Freedom Manor Revised August 12, 2015 It will operate at overall LOS "B" under 2020 and 2026 background as well as total conditions. All the approaches will operate at LOS "D" or better. There were no observed queueing issues for any of the analysis years. c) Final Assessment: The proposed site densities can be adequately accommodated by the surrounding roadway network with a roundabout at the site entrance on Paper -mill Road as shown in Figure 3A. Off -site mitigations that could be considered by the County with or without the site are: 1. Lengthening of the eastbound Papermill Road right -turn lane at its intersection with Route 522 from the existing 35 ft to 325 ft. 2. At the same intersection, incorporating an eastbound right -turn overlap signal phase to run concurrently with the northbound Route 522 left -turn phase. DHOL1404 Page 74 Pennoni PAPERMILL RD FREEDOM MANOR ENTRANCE ROUNDABOUTJUSTIFICATION � Freedom Manor Rezoning ' FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1 Papermill Road/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification In association with the Freedom Manor Rezoning Located in Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Dave Holliday Construction 420 W. Jubal Early Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Tel: (540) 667-2120 Prepared by: Pennoni Associates Inc Engineers . Surveyors . Planners . landscape Architects 117 East Piccadilly St Pennoni Winchester, Virginia 22601 T 540.667.2139 - F 5,10.665.0,193 August 12, 2015 � �DOUGLIS F:. I��NNI<Dy�' l.a Lic. No.21450 C, 9-1-15� 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................................................4 A) PURPOSE OF REPORT AND STUDY OBJECTIVE.................................................................................................................4 A) BICYCLE, PEDESTRIAN AND TRANSIT FACILITIES..............................................................................................................7 F) ACCESS MANAGEMENT SPACING..............................................................................................................................13 G) PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN......................................................................................................................................13 3. DESIGN ELEMENTS........................................................................................................................................14 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS.......................................................................................................................16 A) TRAFFIC GROWTH..................................................................................................................................................16 B) SITE TRAFFIC.........................................................................................................................................................16 C) FUTURE TRAFFIC VOLUMES WITH FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT................................................................................19 D) SHORT-TERM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS...........................................................................................................................19 E) LONG-TERM TRAFFIC OPERATIONS............................................................................................................................21 S. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS.........................................................................................................................24 6. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS.................................................................................................................27 Contact Information The analysis was prepared by Pennoni: Mr. Ronald A. Mislowsky, PE Mr. Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Mr. Patrick Sowers Mr. James R. Gray, PE Mr. Wan Chong, E.I.T. Mr. Graham Young, E.I.T. Pennoni 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667-2139 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 Herndon, Virginia 20171 (703) 449-6700 V:\PROJECTS\DI-iOL\1404-Freedom Manor\DOCUMENT'S\REPORTS\ Pennoni—Freedom Manor —Paper Mill Roundabout Justification_201509.doc []I LIST OF FIGURES Exhibit A: Freedom Alanor Concept Rams!about.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure1: Site Location................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Figure2: Freedom AlanorAccess Plan.......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Exhibit B: Eastern Frederick Conn J, Long Tem., Land Use Plan.............................................................................................................. 10 Exhibit C.• Easlem Frederick Court, Long Term I -and Use Plan.............................................................................................................. 1 1 Exhibit D: Easlem Frederick Como, Road Plan........................................................................................................................................ 12 Exhibil E: Easlem Frederick County Road Plan Cross-Seclions................................................................................................................. 12 Figure 5: Papermrill Road Tralc Vobames wilh Freedom Manor Routdaboul............................................................................................. 18 fFirnguralio.......................................................................................................................... 19 gmfIC Figure 6A: 5'horl-Term 2020 AM Coulitiots: L OS Delay and Degree of Sataralion............................................................................... 20 Figure 6B: Sborl-Turn 2020 PAI Conditions: L OS I7ehy and Degree of Saturation ................................................................................. 21 Figure 711: Long -Term 2026 AA4 Condilions: LOS Delay and llegree of Satrrraliot............................................................................... 23 Figure 7B: Long -Term 2026 PAd Conditions.• LOS Defy and Degree of Saturalior................................................................................. 24 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1: PROPOSED TRAFFIC DESIGN CI IARACTERISI'ICS............................................................................................................... 4 TABLE 2: PAPL'RMII.I. ROAD ROUNDABOUT PROPOSED ACCESS SPACING................................................................................... 13 TABLE3: SITE TRIP GENERATION........................................................................................................................................................ 17 TABLE 4: LONG-TERNI SINGLE LANE ROUNDABOUT' CAPACI'L'Y CHECK ..................................................................................... 22 TABLE 5A: 2026 PAPERM11.1, RD/FREEDOM MANOR SIGNAL Dmi.Y WARRANT........................................................................ 25 TABLE 513: 2026 PAPERMILI, RD/FREEDO,\L MANOR SIGNAL PEAK HOUR WARRANT............................................................. 26 TABLE 6A: Si-LORT'-TERM PAPERNIII.I. RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS ....................................... 28 TABLE 613: LONG-TERM PAPER`III.I, RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS ........................................ 28 APPENDICIES APPENDIX A: PROPERTY OWNER COORDINATION APPENDIX B: AASIDRA WORKSHEETS Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Pennoni Associates, Inc. has prepared this roundabout justification to provide information for the ' review and approval of a roundabout at the proposed Papermill Road (VA Route 644) intersection in Frederick County, Virginia east of the I-81 Corridor. The proposed roundabout is suggested as an alternative to the typical turn lane improvements associated with new development in order to ' provide initial access to the site with the proposed rezoning of approximately 47.5 acres. This analysis is intended to examine the local and through traffic characteristics of the proposed 1 facility to support the concept design elements associated with the proposed land use changes to accommodate 300 residential dwelling units at the site build -out, with access to Papermill Road and to a site connection north to the proposed Madison Village Community, with access to U.S. ' Route 522. The site was zoned for 70 single-family detached residential units in 2004 for the southern portion of the property (approximately 26.2 acres) with access to Papermill Road. The original traffic study methodology was reviewed with VDOT Staunton District staff, and was ' oriented to update future conditions to support the short-term and long-term traffic conditions with the revised land use activities. The traffic study, "Traffic Impact Analysis for Freedom Manor," dated October 28, 2014 updated traffic conditions for short-term access with 100 single- family detached residential units and 200 apartment/townhouse residential units for the long-term. Based on the analysis, VDOT requested a separate southbound left turn lane into the site for the initial single-family detached activities. Based on the VDOT design criteria for Papermill Road, the implementation of the left turn lane would require transitions and off -site R-O-W which were not available. After reviewing constraints with VDOT and pursuing off -site R-O-W from the ' adjacent property owners (See Appendix A), the Applicant revisited the existing geometry constraints and has pursued a design concept for a 3-legged roundabout off -set to allow initial access to the property from Papermill Road. The access concept is shown in Exhibit A for a 140 ft. diameter roundabout. The offset is designed with 40 mph approach curves entering the roundabout to further reduce speeds, in conjunction with the splitter islands, at the new access to the desirable 18-25 mph entering the roundabout. The concept plan satisfies single lane conditions without separate lanes for the site build -out. For the long-term scenario, the roundabout works at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better during the peak hours. The Frederick County Transportation Plan envisions Papermill Road as a four lane divided major collector, so Ithe proposed R-O-W is increased on -site to accommodate the ultimate County R-O-W; however since the operations with the Freedom Manor site are acceptable with the single -lane roundabout as shifted, the implementation of the County's ultimate 4 lane corridor will require future off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road. That scenario is not part of the subject roundabout justification. The Frederick County 2030 Comprehensive Policy Plan Map — excerpted in Exhibit B — shows the general vicinity for the corridor between I-81 and Route 522 with the 4 lane major collector, consistent within the VDOT Functional Plan and the regional road plan for Frederick County (see ' Exhibits C through E). ' DHOL1404 Page 1 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 Traffic volumes were used from the 2014 study and evaluated using the aaSIDRA roundabout capacity software. Relevant traffic and density tables are excerpted from the October 2014 study 1 to support the proposed concept. For the capacity analysis, the roundabout operations were reviewed for both short-term and long-term scenarios. A forth leg to the south was not included since the adjacent property owner representative did not want to sell R-O-W to accommodate road 1 improvements as noted in the Appendix. The proposed alternative can be refined with the final signing and pavement marking plans for implementation within the proposed geometries. ' Pennoni recommends that the final configuration of the roundabout associated with the rezoning to allow: • Off -set of Papermill Road to allow a single lane roundabout with a 140 diameter • One approach lane entering the roundabout from Freedom Manor • Pedestrian and bike accessing a 10 ft. multi -use trail east of the existing road. • Acceptable LOS for a single -lane roundabout at LOS `C' for the long-tenn forecasts. The concept plan allows improvements to the existing two-lane section of Papermill Road to accommodate improved access into the Freedom Manor property. The roundabout is an improved alternative to the approved rezoning to allow for turns on southbound Papermill Road, and allow egress from the side street, since signalization is not anticipated to be warranted. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 2 _1 u r•- J 8 - ; ;rn ftll tualrr �' a apeirmad West vr►� i rb .�•4 ice:: �- Pennon PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 100' 0 100' 100 SCALE: 1" =100' I PROPOPKD R7(7H'f OF %AY" uric. ` Ali=b,a� " «•�VD Papermill Roar FREEDOM MANOR CONCEPT ROUNDABOUT JULY 2015 t CONSULTING ENGINEERS Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 Exhibit A: Freedom Manor Concept Roundabout DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 3 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 201S 2. INTRODUCTION a) Purpose of Report and Study Objective This analysis summarizes transportation planning elements of a proposed roundabout, in order to provide VDOT with the design justification to support the public improvements. This justification and plan attachments are intended to respond to initial VDOT comments, as well as provide a general summary of the design to satisfy the criteria in the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F. The study analyzes the following scenarios: • Short -Term Site Access (2020) Conditions • Long Term Build -out plus Six Year (2026) conditions. The October 2014 Traffic Study reviewed the existing, No -Build scenarios, and total conditions with a conventional intersection at Papermill Road and Route 522 impacts. The TIA was updated in July 2015 for the revised roundabout concept. The site location is shown in Figure I and the localized access plan for Freedom Manor is included in Figure 2. The localized design features of Papermill Road at the roundabout are summarized in Table 1: TABLE 1: PROPOSED TRAFFIC DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS Papermill Road (VA Route 644) Frederick County, VA Design Classification: VDOT GS-7 Urban Major Collector Road ADT (2014) 8,810 Projected ADT (2020) 12,250 Projected ADT (2026) 12,840 DHV (2026) 1233 D (%) 59% EB (PM) T (%) 2% HV V (MPH) 50 Design Speed (45 Posted Speed Limit) 25 MPH roundabout with 40 MPH approach Curves DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 4 12' � 1 r-- J "JI b 669 �I CI \J 6T9 1 t61 661 i 611 Winchester 1651�i Ibs7� . j71 sn 62e'' SITE Stephens City 777 _ (SC 6S► Middletown 677 y Y -00 • Sky Meadows State Park Data source: Googlc \In,. FREEDOM MANOR FIGURE 1 \;,,,,,,, , it �,,,,, \,,,,\ SITE LOCATION FREDERICK COUNTY. VA Figure 2Freedom Manor Access Plan NI ._ Madison Village Road and Trail Connection to Madison Village Road and Tr lai Connectabn to TM 63—A-145 YflA3E 1 ' Westwood � Drive North/South Proposed Connector Road 10' Trail ' or Bike Lane , Proposed Proposed Roundabout � � I 10' Trail ' SUBJECT PROPERTY 1 *o 1*1 AProposed �o �A R/W Dedication ce Ste. c', Shenandoah o Memorial Park FREEDOM MANOR t o Generolized Development Plan QP Cb FREDERICK COUNTY, vIRGIN/A Existing Signal Bend_ V Avenge' `stone PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 The localized study area is in the Shawnee Magisterial District of Frederick County. The County covers an area of approximately 416 square miles and has a population estimated at 78,305 (2010 Census). A description of the study area roadways in the vicinity of the site is provided below: Papermill Road (Route 644): is an approximately 1.5 mile roadway that starts within the City of Winchester and continues in a southeasterly direction ending at Route 522. It is 2-lane undivided and considered an urban minor collector by VDOT. Papermill Road carried an ADT of 7,600 vehicles in 2013 according to VDOT estimates. The speed limit in the study area is 45 mph. Existing traffic conditions in the Study area are shown in Figure 3. a) Bicycle, Pedestrian and Transit facilities Sidewalks are not located along Papermill Road within the study area. A proposed shared use path is suggested along the site frontage with the rezoning with the new roadway. b) Existing Land Use Figure 4 from the Traffic Study shows the existing land use activities adjacent to Papermill Road. The site is undeveloped north of Route 644. To the south, the area across from the site is in agricultural use. To the southeast of the site, the Shenandoah Memorial Park is located at the Papermill Road curve west of Evendale Lane and extends east to US Route 522, with driveways to Papermill Road and Route 522. I DHOL1404 Page 7 Pe»»o»X O I + i nh'aifi k, `1-di,,i'Il Village -3 8,810 Proposed roundabout location a N ^1` ro O 7 � C LEGEND t STUDY INTERSECTIONS tTURNING 1 MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) 1,000 WEEKDAY ADT N Approximate Site Boundary 0 y� / 11I I G I SITE J ° r"_ W ,I �I 16,430 k) SITE papermill Road (Route 644 10 17.770 G V W O Y O N � � O C O � I.t `r ■ M Y C N O .O. Papermill Road .� (Route 644) 62(121).o 130 (372) N a JUstes Drive O 118 (70) 50 (41) Drive tJustes ■ v Q+ N ro � O t7 W FREEDOM MANOR 2014 EXISTING FIGURE 3 • IWUNDABOUT JUSTIFICATION TRAFFIC VOLUMES °H01.14" a FREDERICK COUNTY, VA I I A."'.Tf _'0/5 1 17 e I Approximatc Sitc Boundary 7 Pennonio - - - ---1 Ea ; ir L w IIU , Ames Drive IW E Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 c) Future Land Use Changes Exhibit B shows the proposed Comprehensive Plan for the immediate vicinity adjacent to the Freedom Manor site. The Plan anticipates that the site be developed as residential, (yellow) and high density residential (crosshatch green -brown) with transition to employment uses (green crosshatch) adjacent to the I-81 corridor west. Land south of Papermill Road is proposed as park area. Exhibit B. Eastern Frederick County Long Term Land Use Plan Source: Frederick County, Amended June 13, 2012 d) Transportation Plan Lore gange L—d Uc V,an tow comor<nw.+.<.ac. wn K+o � xX . O,w<., Exhibit C is provided to show the County's existing road Functional Plan uses in the Eastern Plan area. Papermill Road is a major collector. DHOL1404 Pennons Page 10 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 Existing Conditions Street Functional Classifications � �/ IrltHr.ra lH �� • 00%WpLlap M AO",, 0 • ^� pAuvx Atts ial \�nby�■ raw„hw I'wal Rd *Urban Development Area Sewer and Water Service Area �? RuralCommunityCenter Exhibit C• Eastern Frederick Countv Long Term Land Use Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 e) Future Roadway Changes `030 Co—prat-1— VohcV %an MJv .4,lar uveA: ),IV 11th. _'011 The street through Freedom Manor is proposed as a local street. The County transportation plan envisions a parallel corridor —Warrior Drive Extended —to be constructed west of the site to provide through access east of I-81 to the future Tevis street extension corridor. The County Plan also envisions the existing curve of Papermill Road to the south of Freedom Manor (adjacent to the Shenandoah Memorial Park Cemetery) to be realigned to the south to opposite the Justes Drive signal. However, these roadway changes are not funded and are not included in the roundabout justification. The Eastern Area Road Plan is shown in Exhibit D with the cross - sections summarized in Exhibit E. Papermill Road is envisioned as U4D section in the study area as an improved major collector. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 11 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 I� r� y � O / •• ( 40 r • \ •:: 4# szz��• ' of No Ville • Exhibit D: Eastern Frederick Counn, Road Plan Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 • 1 ,•� 51L Exhibit E: Eastern Frederick County Road Plan Cross -Sections Source: Frederick County, Amended July 14, 2011 DHOL1404 Piennoni Eastern Road Plan - ]an 2011 New Major Arterial improved Major Arterial New Minor Arterial - `p improved Minor Arterial New Major Collector improved Major colkctor New Minor Collector improved Minor coilector Ramp Trails Future Rt 37 Bypass �aurt]an Development Area &elder and Water Sery ce Area �.7 RuralcortvnunRvc enter��}'�T�¢i���'/) T i Eastern Road Plan Cross Sections A ''�► ONO , 4.4. Future Rt 37 Bypass •-$Urban Development Area IlbSevver and Water Service Area k, Ruralcommunitycenter •n io tmnor.+.e..v.. GOYq von Mao � �4�, ♦pyrov.�] .ih I rM. '� 1l � rt r''� Page 12 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 f) Access Management Spacing The proposed access plan would satisfy the VDOT access management guidelines for a Collector Road, as classified by VDOT Functional Classification with a 35-45 MPH speed limit. See Table 2 for dimensions, consistent with the VDOT Road Design Manual Appendix F criteria. TABLE 2: PAPERMILL ROAD ROUNDABOUT PROPOSED ACCESS SPACING DirectionStreet •.Notes Papermill Road West — 665 To Harrison Lane. Approximately 1,700 ft to Caldwell Lane east of the I-81 overpass). South —1,250 To driveway to 3790 Papermill Rd (Parcel 26) and app. 2,500 ft to Evandale Lane. VDOT Access Management Road Design Manual Appendix F Table 2-2 Criteria Roundabout Spacing 440 Collector (35 to 45 MPH Legal Speed Limit) (Signalized and Unsi nalized intersections Therefore, the subject roundabout would not require access waivers. To the west, the first signal ' is located in the City of Winchester west of Shawnee Drive at the East Tevis Street/South Pleasant Valley Road intersection, or over 1.7 miles from the subject roundabout. The future extension of Warrior Drive would not create access management spacing conflicts with the proposed ' roundabout. To the east, the adjacent signal is at the Route 522 intersection, or 4,150 ft. from the subject roundabout. ' g) Proposed Concept Plan The proposed roundabout design with roundabout 140 feet diameter is shown in Exhibit A, based ' on the design concepts developed with the TORUS roundabout software, which develops designs to accommodate heavy vehicle turns and general pavement edges. For the subject site, Pennoni added R-O-W based on County and VDOT requirements for Papermill Road. The extension into ' the Freedom Manor site is shown or road engineering only and will vary with design after the proposed splitter island. ' Due the desire to avoid off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road, the Route 644 centerlines were curved north as shown with a radius of 593 ft. (40 MPH design) to shift the roadway approaching the roundabout. The centerlines are off -set in the roundabout to reduce the entry speeds for ' through traffic. DHOL1404 Page 13 Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 3. DESIGN ELEMENTS The design criteria and typical sections used for the roundabout concept design are outlined below for consideration by VDOT. The design speed proposed is at 50 MPH, with operations within the roundabout at approximately 25 MPH. Design Vehicle: The WB-67 Modified (wheel base of 41 feet) design for trucks and buses will be accommodated with the proposed roundabout. The modifications reflect the Virginia State law maximum length to approximate a WB-65 design vehicle. Approach Grades and Sight Distances: Papermill Road to/from Freedom Manor has a downgrade of approximately I percent from the north and south. Inscribed Outer Diameter of the Circulatory Roadway: The inscribed diameter for the proposed roundabout is at 140 feet. Apron Composition, Width, Slope and Curb Standard: The truck apron is proposed as concrete with the curb accommodating the VDOT CG-3 modified design. Circulatory Lane Width: Shown at 18 feet. Approach Lane Width, Deflection and Radii: Lane widths shown at 16-18 feet clear. The entering radii on Papermill Road are shown at approximately 100 feet. Departure Lane Width, Deflection and Radii: Lane widths shown at 16-18 feet clear. The departure lanes at Papermill Road in Exhibit A allow for a radius at the exit of 200 feet on Papermill Road and exiting Freedom Manor. Proposed Pedestrian Crossing Locations: The pedestrian crossings are shown approximately 20 feet back from the outer edge from the circulatory lane on the north side only to accommodate a 10 ft. shared use trail.. To the south, the edge of pavement is maintained without pedestrian access. Bicycle Lane Approach/Termination point:. No in road facilities are provided. Pavement Marking: The signing and marking plans will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines and be included with final design. Signing: The signing will comply with the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) guidelines and be included with final design. DHOL1404 Pennons Page 14 IPapermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 The pavement markings and signs will comply with the Federal Highway Administration 2009 edition of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the MOT Supplernent to the MUTCD, and NCHRP Report 672 Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (2nd Edition) 2010. Roadway Lighting- Roadway lighting is proposed with this project. Nearest Entrance Locations, and Nature of Property Use- To the west, the nearest street is at Harrison Street, a local street, or approximately 665 feet to the northwest, as measured from the outside edge of the inscribed circle to the centerline of the side street. To the east, the roundabout is approximately 2,410 feet from Evendale Lane. As noted, the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan envisions suburban and medium density residential north of Papermill Road and park uses to the south of Route 644. Employment uses are envisioned to the west adjacent to I-81. Present & Design Year Volumes — See Section 4 for the derivation and methodology on traffic forecasts. Figure 5 summarizes the design year forecast. aaSIDRA analysis LOS/Queues: See Section 4 for LOS and queues lengths. The LOS is acceptable as a single -lane roundabout. Proximity of roundabout to nearest signal: The U.S. Route 522 intersection is approximately 4,100 linear feet (10 from the proposed roundabout and is signalized. To the west, the nearest existing signal is in the City at South Pleasant Valley Road, approximately 1.7 ft. from the proposed roundabout. For the long-term conditions, if Warrior Drive is constructed as planned parallel to I-81, the spacing from the roundabout to the signal would exceed feet. DHOL1404 Page 15 Pennoni ' Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 4. FUTURE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS The October 2014 study addressed growth, background conditions and local development anticipated with the Freedom Manor site volumes for the Papermill Road and Route 522 corridors. The following sections outline relevant resources used for the roundabout capacity evaluation. a) Traffic Growth As part of the traffic analyses for the short and long-term conditions, the changes in traffic included other local development including the Madison Village site, Frederick County High School site, and a growth rate of 1.5 percent annually was assumed for the analysis of years of ' 2020 and 2026, in the traffic study. Traffic volumes were determined based on the western link volumes at the Route 522 signal with Papermill Road and extended as throughs past the subject site. The proposed Freedom Manor location does not have any adjacent public street or private entrances adjacent to the frontage, so ' the continuation of the through volumes should be accurate. The entrance to the cemetery and the Evandale Lane connection are the only major traffic generator sources between the site end Route 522. ' For 2020, Papermill Road is anticipated to accommodate 11,410 VPD, while the 2026 scenario estimated 12,310 VPD adjacent to the site. b) Site Traffic The proposed Freedom Manor site -generated trips were calculated using traffic generation rates published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation, 91h Edition, 2012, as well as VDOT Staunton District requirements that require 80% of the trips for townhomes and apartments to be calculated using VDOT local rates. The project is planned to be built in two phases, with Phase 1 (2020) consisting of 100 single-family residential dwelling units and Phase 2 ' (2026) consisting of a mix of 200 townhomes and apartment residential dwelling units. Table 3 shows the weekday AM and PM peak hour and daily trips generated by the proposed project for the two phases, with the values used in the analysis boxed. The values outside the boxes are shown for comparison. DHOL1404 Pennon Page 16 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 3: SITE TRIP GENERATION PEAK 110UR PAIL 1' LTE L—d Uar (1) I SI PEAK 11OUR IP31 CODE. COO DENSITY V_r LV )� T0T.11. GV 01?TOTAL -ao • Trip Generation By Right 210 210.190 70 DU Single -Faro Del. (VDOT) 13 40 53 44 26 70 700 Trip Generation options and land use variables PHASE 1 (2020) 210 210170 100 DU e SF Res. a 100 DU (using EQUATION) 20 60 80 57 34 91 I,O50 210 210.100 100 DU Single-Fam.Det (using AVERAGE RATE) 19 56 75 63 37 100 952 BUILD-OU 1' (2026) 230 230.000 200 DU Townhouse (using AVERAGE RATE) 15 73 88 70 34 104 1,172 230 230.180 40 DU a THRes @40DU (using EQUATION) 4 21 25 19 9 28 291 231.400 160 DU (3) Townhouse (VDOT Staunton District Rate) 23 78 101 a3 47 130 1,303 Total 47 159 206 159 90 249 2,643 AM Peak He. PM Peak Hour Daily rffecrive THI) Rates (2.3) — Y Inbou„ f2--Y N-IPbo Weekday 210 Single -Fan, Mr.(VIXPI-) DU 0.76 25% 1.03 63°0 1000 210 SF Rt s @100 DU DU 080 25% 0.91 63,. 1050 AVE 210 Single -Fans IM. DU R75 25% 1.00 6345 9.52 AVE 230 Townhouse DU 0A4 17/ 0.52 67. 5.86 230 TI I Res tQ+ •10 DU DU 063 16% 0.70 6S. 7.25 T.—h.use(VIXYT Swum— District Raw) DU 063 2.3 0.81 &too 8.1-t TRIP RATE SOURCE: Trip Generation Manual (9th Edition), Institute of Transportation Engineers; 2012. Average trip rates used, unless noted with "e", then equations used at size sharm, wth data set OK for R2 > .0.75 AND SO > 110% of ago. (1) ITE Land Code shown as the first 3 digits. Decimal shown for Internal use by Pennoni for lookup table for trip rate variable. (2) EffectKo ldp rates calculated by land use: For avenge rates = (Denslty) x (ave. trip nte) = 2-vny Trips x (inbound pereenctge) for Trips In For RE equations, 'e' noted = (Density) x ( trip cquadon) = 2-way Trips x (inbound percentage) for Trips In (3) Assumed 80% of townhouses at Staunton District effective Rates for lovmhouse, condo, or apartment. The site trip generation of approximately 2,650 ADT was assigned to the roadway network as ' documented in the traffic impact study for the land use application. Traffic assignments were based on two scenarios: ' 0 Short-term 2020 with 100 SF DU and only access to Papermill Road • Long-term 2026 with site build -out and an inteiparcel connection through the Madison ' Village site to US Route 522 north. The interparcel connection between the Freedom Manor and Madison Village to the north was ' assumed to be open for 2026 total conditions, giving trips for both developments a choice between two entrances. Consequently, Madison Village and Freedom Manor traffic assignments needed to be altered for localized diversions. ' DHOL1404 Page 17 Pennoni 2020 SHORT-TERM 00 eq •- 12 (7) M 'V 48(27) Site Entrance 1,050 FC v" N v N VOLUMES m B (B) Q /✓= C (D) JU N Site Entrance c t^ 0 w U 0. U U OVERALL a v ICU = A (A) LOS WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION OI FA--(B) [A Q A (A) Q Site Entrance �n O U o. .t OVERALL a A (A) LOS = A (B) LOS WITH ROUNDABOUT Approximate Site Boundary LEGEND N INV TURNING MOVEMENTS 100(100) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC: AM(PM) I,000 WEEKDAYADT pLANE GEOMETRY °rot STOP SIGN • ROUNDABOUT A (A) AM PEAK LOS (PM PEAK LOS) 2026 LONG-TERM o •F � n yr ro 113 (61) 99 (55) Site Entrance 3,180 i" 0 � � v v N VOLUMES �B(B) A Q / = C (E) u Site Entrance = u U U OVERALL a ICU = A (A) LOS WITH CONVENTIONAL INTERSECTION © A (C) U_ Q A (A) Q Site Entrance �v 0 C, iza 0 OVERALL a v A LOS = A (B) (B) LOS WITH ROUNDABOUT FREEDOM MANOR PAPERMILL ROAD TRAFFIC FIGURE 5 • ROUNDABOUT JUSTIFICATION VOLUMES WITH FREEDOM MANOR D11O 1404 FREDERICK COUNTY, VA ROUNDABOUT dugosr1015 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1 I I c) Future Traffic Volumes with Freedom Manor Roundabout With the proposed site access, the Daily volumes on Papermill Road are anticipated to increase to 12,250 VPD in 2020, and up to 12,800 in 2026. Freedom Manor access is anticipated to accommodate 1,050 VPD north of Papermill Road in the short-term and approximately 3,200 VPD in the long-term with build -out as a local street. d) Short-term Traffic Operations The summary of peak hour trips for the short- term and long-term traffic at the roundabout is included in Figure 5. The graphic shows both scenarios with the site, the peak hour volumes at the roundabout and the LOS by approach for the single lane roundabout. The aaSIDRA worksheets for 2020 and 2026 conditions with the site are included in Appendix B of this report. An assessment of the projected volumes on Papermill Road determined single lane approaches could be adequate. Figure 6 shows the lane configuration tested for the short-term traffic volumes. Figure 6: Short -Term Freedom Manor Lane Configuration The results of the analysis show the Papermill Road approaches operating at a LOS "A" in the AM peak and at a LOS `B" during the PM peak hour under the projected 2020 traffic volumes. The degree of saturation for all movements is at 0.50 or better, well below the Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 19 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 capacity of the roundabout. Figures 6A and 6B show the delay and degree of saturation for the AM and PM Peak hours, respectively. DELAY (CONTROL) DEGREE OF SATURATION Average contrul delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vie ratio) ® Site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site V site: 2020 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance - — Roundabout New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes AM Movement Classes South East North interseedw 8.6 0.6 7.4 8.0 Sovh East Nat intersection A A A A 0,47 0.10 0 43 0A7 l L Papermill Road Papermill Road 6.6L ®t� 611 10 to 7 Papermill Road Pap," -A Road �r 047 �r �- --�—� Cobur code cased on Degree of 3aturavon L=L_ _Cr LOSS El LjSE LOSF Continuous '9.8 Continuous Figure 6A: Short -Term 2020 AM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 20 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, a average pedestrian delay (seconds) V Site: 2020 PM PapermiR Road at Site Entrance New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes South East North :nw sermon 9.2 6.1 13.4 114 LOS A A 8 e IL 3A Papermill Road N� v 4-1 C ®�Uj 81r Papermill Road �r DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vlc ratio) V7 Site: 2020 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Sfte Roundabout AN Movement Classes South East North Intersectlon 0-50 0.08 0.87 UP Papermill Road ` a 0UBL ®t I c 006 ll� v I � I( Papermlll Road i0 r Colour code based on Lroe9 of Servroe Colour oode based on free or Saturation LOS A LOG 8 LOS C LOS 0 LOS E LOS F Continuous [ a 0. 61 [ 0A - 0.71 10.7 -0.81 (Ob - 0.91 [ 0.9 - t 31 1 01 (—ntinuous Figure 6B: Short -Term 2020 PM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation e) Long-term Traffic Operations A single lane roundabout was checked based on the HCM 2010/FHWA Roundabout Guidelines, as summarized in Table 4. Consistent with the aaSIDRA analysis, both the AM and PM volumes from Figure 5 are below the approach and conflicting capacity of a single lane roundabout. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 21 IPapermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 4: LONG-TERM SINGLE LANE ROUNDABOUT CAPACITY CHECK FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, Equation 4-3, Operations One -Lane Roundabout AM Conflicting Lane Entering Volume OK? Volume Capacity (lu EB 0 456 716 OK WB 212 404 754 OK N B 441 57 1067 OK SB 357 99 1023 OK PM Conflicting Lane Entering Volume OK? Volume Capacity (lu EB 0 779 519 OK WB 116 448 722 OK NB 542 100 1022 OK S B 724 55 1070 OK NOTE: No adjustments for Heavy Vehicle Flow or PHF in estimates. All entries are pc/hr (Passenger car equivalents). The proposed lane configurations for the 2026 conditions remain the same as the short-term scenario. No new legs were added and the Papermill Road widening as envisioned in the County Comprehensive Plan has not been initiated. Instead the roundabout was tested with additional turning traffic at the Freedom Manor intersection, and with extra growth to verify if the single lane roundabout is adequate. The alternative design would be to add separate left and right turn lanes on Papermill Road as a conventional intersection. LOS was included in the original traffic study. Figures 7A and 7B show the delay and degree of saturation for the AM and PM Peak hours, respectively, for the long-term traffic scenario. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 22 I I I I 1 1 1 1 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) ® Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance_ New Site Roundabout All Movement Classes So,& East North Inde�on 9.0 4A 8.4 8.8 LOS A A A A Papermill Road August 12, 2015 DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Yolvme to Capacity (vfc ratio) ® Site: 2026 AM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site — -- Roundabout M Novsvnent Classes Sow IW Moth Iniersedlon 047 0.33 0.41 0.47 PapermUl RCad M 9.4 , a 94� — n Papermill Road Paperm ll Road 1' 39 a r it Colcur code based on Degree of Saturanon Colour code based on Level of Service (,oel 10.e-0,71 (o.7-e.al (0-8-0.9I l09-'0] (-17 ,omn,ous -OS A LOS 8 LOG C LOS D LOS E LOS F Conunuous Figure 7A: Long -Term 2026 AM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation The results of the analysis show acceptable operation during both AM and PM peak hours under the projected 2026 traffic volumes. The AM approaches all operate at LOS "A", while the PM peak conditions operate at LOS "A" exiting Freedom Manor. Through traffic on Papermill Road operates at a LOS `B-C" conditions. The worst performing approach is projected to be eastbound Papermill Road (north leg), operating at LOS "C" during the PM peak hour with a saturation level at less 0.80. This scenario recognizes that the design as suggested does have capacity for increased traffic without widen to a multi -lane roundabout. Pennoni DHOL1404 Page 23 11 IPapermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 1 11 � I � I � I 1 DELAY (CONTROL) Average control delay per vehicle, or average pedestrian delay (seconds) V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site - Roundabm.,, All Movement Classes io•th East Np+h inwseAon 12.1 7.7 18.0 l+8 LOS 8 A C e Papefingl Road i� y / 7,7� ®1 y 77r' Papemnu Road 12 1 r DEGREE OF SATURATION Ratio of Demand Volume to Capacity (vlc ratio) _ V Site: 2026 PM Papermill Road at Site Entrance New Site -- Rou nd 3'aout All Movente,it Classes :�o.At _35t North nterwoon GAO 01e 0.77 0.77 Papermill Road Papermi9 Road 30 r m 019E 019r dour node Deed on lPve, of ServrrP Cclour code based on Degfee of =- 10.7-0.81 10.8-0.91 10.9-1.01 i>1.01 Continuous UX A LOS a LOS C LOS G LOS E LOS F Continuous Figure 7B: Long -Term 2026 PM Conditions: LOS Delay and Degree of Saturation 5. SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS ' Based on the procedures described in the Manuel of Traffic Signal Design published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE), Pennoni has reviewed alternative traffic operations as unsignalized control. As noted in the summary, adding turn lanes and shifting the Papermill Road ' centerline to accommodate a left turn lane transition would require off -site frontage along the feet long frontage. Without off -site R-O-W, this implementation would not be able to be implemented without modifications or waivers of VDOT design criteria. Pennoni did also check ' if signalization at the site entrance may be pursued as an alternative to mainline turn lanes on Papermill Road with traffic signal warrant analysis for the subject roundabout. I DHOL1404 Page 24 Pennoni -1 LJ Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 For the signal analysis, Pennoni reviewed daily and peak hour volume thresholds to verify if ' signalization could be considered. Overall, the signalization would not be satisfied, assuming a 50% right turn on red option for the Freedom Manor side street turns. Tables 5A and 5B show the long-term Daily and Peak Hour signal warrants. TABLE 5A: 2026 PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR SIGNAL DAILY WARRANT ' Intersection: Papermill Road & Site Entrance Analysis Year: 2026 Total Conditions (50% RTOR) Signal Warrant Type: ITE Daily Warrant ' EADT Major EADT Minor 12,805 vpd 761 vpd Urban: Yes Rural: no Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on major street (total of both Vehicles per day on higher volume minor street 1. Minimum Vehicular Warrant Unsatlsflod approaches) (one direction only) Number of lanes for moung traffic on each approach M(yor.Slreei LfinorSt"er Url", j ILrral Urfmr ILera! 1 x 1 x 8,000 [ J 5,600 2,400 1,680 ' 2 or more 1 9,600 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 or more 2 or more 9,600 6,720 3.200 2,240 1 2 or more 8,000 5,600 3.200 2,240 ' 2. Interruption of Continuous Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher Traffic Warrant Unsatisfied street (total of both volume minor street approaches) (one direction only) Number of lanes for moHng traffic on each approach Major Srreef blinor Sweet Urban jj J�j Itaral P1 Uri— 16ral 1 x 1 x 12,000 8.400 1,200 850 2 or more 1 14,400 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more 2 or more 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 or more 12,000 8,42T 1,600 1,120 3. Combination Unsatisfied 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied but following warrants Q fulfilled 80% or more ❑ t ❑ 2 ' (') Major Street EADT-Total of Both Approaches (**)Minor Street EADT- Higher Volume apprcach. Half of ADT EADT--Estimated Average Daily Traffic Note: ' 1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if separate signal phase is to be proHded for the left -turn movements 2. To be used only for new intersections or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. ' Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Manual of Traffic Signal Design ' DHOL1404 Page 25 �'eII7nl7►t'1!l► Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 5B: 2026 PAPERNIILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR SIGNAL PEAK HOUR WARRANT Intersection: Papermill Road & Site Entrance Analysis Year: 2026 Total Conditions (50% RTOR) Signal Warrant Type: MUTCD Peak Hour Warrant 600 500 PMNOR tau STREET HIGHER - VOLUME 300 APPROACH- VPH 200 100 Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour No 150' 100' 400 00 E00 700 900 10il) 1 ' 0 13C0 1,100 1500 1600 1700 1800 �803 1,153 MAJOR SI1A- —TOTAL OF BO H APPROACHES — VEHICLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note 150 vph applies as the lo,,ver Ihreshcld volume 'or a minor -street approach wllh I vo or mere lanes and 100 vph app ies as the lower :rreshold volume for a minor -street approach wltn one lane. Source: MUTCD Signal Warrants - Warrant 3 - Figure 4C4 Analysis: Pennoni Associates, Inc. AM Peak • PM Peak♦ Major Street - Papermill Rd. Total of Both Approaches: 798 VPH 1,266 VPH WARRANT NOT SATISFIED Minor Street- Site Entrance Higher Volume Approach: 155 VPH 85 VPH DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 26 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 6. RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS As previously noted and shown in Exhibit A and the level of services in Figures 6A through 713, the Papermill Road/Freedom Manor site access intersection can function as a single lane roundabout, as an alternative to adding left and right turn lanes on Route 644. The addition of a roundabout would provide improved access and allows for a design to be implemented with the initial phase of development. Under the existing zoning approvals, a left turn lane was not ' provided with the approved access, so geometric improvements associated with the upgraded in land use entitlement provide a superior access plan, in relation to the existing approvals for 70 single family detached homes. The roundabout design concept does recognize a shift in the ' location of the intersection, in order to assist in the traffic calming along Route 644. The off -set intersection allow for through traffic on Papermill Road eastbound to slow down from the west as they approach the roundabout, and avoid higher speeds within the circle, or traffic cutting through the roundabout with the splitters and island. The radii proposed and the general configuration are suggested as a concept to allow the roundabout to be constructed as part of the initial development ' of the site, without requiring off -site R-O-W south of Papermill Road. For the zoning entitlement, the developers request VDOT and the County support the alternative roundabout in order to allow the application to continue. The alternative satisfies VDOT criteria and allows for ultimate dedication for a half section of a 4 lane divided facility along Papermill Road, should the County/VDOT or others pursue widening in the future. The roundabout will provide excellent traffic operations for the short- and long term scenarios with the proposed rezoning. ' A comparison of the roundabout LOS with LOS delay and degree of saturation is summarized in Table 6A for the short-term and Table 6B for the long-tenn forecasts, with a comparison to the conventional unsignalized intersection operations with turns lanes. The roundabout maintain ' LOS at LOS "C" or better for all movements as a single lane roundabout. Therefore the roundabout would provide adequate access for the site, and will provide an ' alternative to off -site R-O-W, to allow safe access to the property with initial development. ' DHOL1404 Page 27 Perinoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 TABLE 6A: SHORT-TERM PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS C.CIMPARTSC)NS '1'rnfOc Control Lane Group/ Approach AM Peak flour PM Peak flour : LOS DelayZ (In sec) Back of z Queue (In feet) Degree of t Saturation : LOS Delay' (In sec) Back of a Queue (in feet) Degree of 1 Sahrration W B/L C 18.3 25 D 26.4 25 WB/R 13 I L5 25 B 11.4 0 WB LOS C 16.9 C 23.3 - NB/1R A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 Unsignalvad NB LOS A 0.0 - A 0.0 - SB/L A 8.4 0 A 8.5 0 SB/I' A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 SB LOS A 0.1 - A 0.1 - ICUa A 34.9% - A 43.7% - WB/LR A 6.6 25 0.10 A 6.1 25 0.06 WB LOS A 6.6 - 0.10 A 6.1 - 0.06 NB/IR A 8.6 70 0.47 A 9.2 80 0.50 Roundabout NB LOS A 8.6 - 0.47 A 9.2 - 0.50 SB/CI' A 7.4 43 0.36 13 13.4 145 0.67 SB LOS A 7.4 - 0.36 B 13.4 - 0.67 Overall A 8.0 0.47 B 8.8 - 0.67 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, Sl3 = Soutliboimd, L: Lc It, I :I hru, K: Kigla (2) Unsignalbcd values calculated with IICM methodology using Synchro 8. SIDRA used for roundabout. (3) Intersection Capacity Utilbation. TABLE 6B: LONG-TERM PAPERMILL RD/FREEDOM MANOR ROUNDABOUT LOS COMPARISONS 'rrrffic Control Lane Group/ t Approach AM Peak flour PM Peak flour : LOS = Delay (in see) Back of t Queue (it, feet) Degree of Saturationt t LOS 2 Dclay (in sec) Back of 2 Queue (in feet) Degree of Saturation= WB/I. C 23.9 40 E 45.3 45 WB/R B 12.3 25 B 11.8 25 WB LOS C 17.7 - D 27.7 - N B/r A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 Unsignal¢ed NB/R A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 NB LOS A 0.0 - A 0.0 - SB/L A 8.4 25 A 8.7 0 SBrr A 0.0 0 A 0.0 0 SB LOS A 1.3 - A 1.2 - ICU3 A 40.1% A 42.8% - WB/LR A 9.4 33 0.33 A 7.7 25 0.19 WB LOS A 9.4 - 0.33 A 7.7 - 0.19 NB/1'R A 8.9 65 0.47 B 12.1 103 0.60 Roundabout NB LOS A 8.9 - 0.47 B 12.1 - 0.60 SB/LT A 8.4 50 0.41 C 18.0 205 0.77 SB LOS A 8.4 - 0.41 C 18.0 - 0.77 Overall A 8.8 - 0.47 B 14.8 - 0.77 (1) EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, N13 = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Lett, I A hnr, It: Right (2) Unsignalvcd values calculated with IICM methodology acing Synchro 8. SIDRA used for roundabout. (3) Intersection Capacity Utilization. DHOL1404 Pennoni Page 28 I� � APPENDIX 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 APPENDIXA: ADJACENT -PR OPERTYOWNER CO ORDINA TION FOR PAPERMILL RD Pennoni Papermill Rd/Freedom Manor Entrance Roundabout Justification August 12, 2015 APPENDIX B: AASIDRA WORKSHEETS Pennoni „Pennoni PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS September 8, 2015 Candice Perkins, AICP Department of Planning & Development Frederick County 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Freedom Manor Revisions and Response to Comments Dear Candice, SEP �pt)p �' 1 Please find attached a revised proffer package along with a revised traffic impact analysis and roundabout justification for the Freedom Manor rezoning application for your review. The revised proffers propose an off -set single lane roundabout at the site entrance on Papermill Road to accommodate turning movements both in the short term and at full build -out without the need to acquire off -site right of way. I have included a redlined version of the revised proffer statement to identify changes made since the initial submission. In addition, I have attached a CD containing the digital files for the revised traffic study materials, including the appendices. Lastly, to aid in your review, the following is our response to the comments provided in your letter dated February 2, 2015: 1) Comment: Senseny/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land use Plan. The site is within the limits of the Sensney/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density) and high -density residential (12-16 units per acre). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis for phase 1 is shown at 3.4 units per acre and phase 2 at up to 14.4. While these densities and land uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan, there are not assurances that the area designated for high density area will develop as indicated. Response: The area designated as high density residential by the Comprehensive Plan is limited, by proffer, to single family attached or apartment dwelling units in order to achieve a higher density than a typical single family development. Ultimately, the market will dictate the end product type, but the prohibition of single family dwellings ensures that the area will development at a higher density as envisioned by the Comprehensive Plan. 2) Comment: Minimum Units. The Phase 2 area should include a proffer for a minimum density to ensure compliance with the high density residential designation in the comprehensive plan. Statements regarding the use of single family detached through TDR's in phase 2 should be removed as TDR's can be utilized for attached and multifamily units. The proffer as currently worded, allowing the single family detached in phase 2 would greatly reduce the density and would then not conform with the comprehensive plan. Response: With no final design in place, a proffered minimum number of units could prove problematic at final design/build-out if site constraints would not enable the site to meet that minimum. The end density will be dictated by the end housing type constructed in Phase 2, which is now limited to only single family attached or apartment dwellings to ensure a higher density yield in an effort to comply with the "high density residential” designation of the Comprehensive Plan. 117 East Piccadilly Street • Winchester, VA 22601 • Ph: 540-667-2139 • Fx: 540-665-0493 www.pennoni.com 0- Freedom Manor September 8, 2015 Page 2 3) Comment: Site Development. Proffer 1.1 includes a statement regarding the use of TDR's in phase 2. Phase 2 would be developed for single family attached or apartment units "unless developed for single family detached dwellings under the County's Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance as provided for by proffer 5.1 ". Please note that TDR's can be utilized for all housing types, not only single family detached. A calculator is included in the TDR ordinance for the development of attached/multifamily units. If there is a desire to construct detached units in phase 2 it should be included in the permissible housing types and the "unless" statement removed along with a minimum densit or unit number (not maximum). Response: As discussed in the responses for comments 1 and 2 above, the proffer statement has been revised to permit only single family attached or apartment units within Phase 2 in order to achieve a higher density in the areas designated as "high density residential" by the Comprehensive Plan. The revised proffer statement also allows for TDR's to be utilized for any dwelling unit located on the Property, but single family dwelling units would still be prohibited within Phase 2. 4) Comment: Proffer 5.1. The need for the statement "At the applicant's sole discretion, any dwelling units constructed in Phase 2 that utilize the TDR Ordinance may be single family detached dwelling units" is unclear. Inclusion of the option to utilize TDR's for any of the 300 proposed units appears to be sufficient. Response: Proffer statement revised accordingly. 5) Comment: Development Impact Model. The proffer exempts 25 single family dwelling units form the monetary contribution outlined in the Development Impact Model. The impact statement shows that this is due to the existing RP zoning on the 6 acre portion of the property. However, due to the restrictive covenant regarding access, this area is not developable with the by -right density unless the RA zoned portion of the property is rezoned with this application. Therefore, the impact on County facilities for all residential units proposed with this development should be addressed with this rezoning. Response: While the existing restrictive covenant precludes access from Westwood Drive to the approximate 6 acre area currently zoned RP, access to that area could still be provided by a road extension from either the north (via Madison Village and across the RA zoned portions of the site) or the south (via existing area approved for Freedom Manor). The units that could be built in this existing, zoned area of the site are not an impact generated by the proposed rezoning. Accordingly, the exemption of the last 25 single family dwelling units from monetary proffers remains in the revised proffer. 6) Comment: Trail Location. The 10' trail is shown along the property lines on the GDP and in the proffer. Within the Madison Village development the trail runs along the roadway, therefore if developed as proposed someone coming from Madison Village network would transition away from the main roadway and onto a private trail within the open space and then to Papermill Road. The trail should go along the main road within the development and include a trail throught he area that connects to Route 522. Response: The revised proffer provides for bike lanes along the north/south connector road, as requested. In addition, a 10' trail is provided along the Papermill Road frontage and the southern property boundary. 0— Freedom Manor September 8, 2015 Page 3 7) Comment: Shenandoah Memorial Park Buffer. The proffer statement from 2005 contained a proffer for a 50' distance buffer with landscaping and a 6' iron type fence along the cemetery boundary. The new proffer statement eliminates all of these commitments. The new application should include some form of buffer landscaping and the installation of the fence. Response: The revised proffer statement provides for a single row of evergreen trees along the common property line with Shenandoah Memorial Park. The remaining boundaries of Shenandoah Memorial Park do not include any type of fencing, so proffered fencing should not be necessary. 8) Comment: Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. Response: Acknowledged. 9) Comment: Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshal, Frederick County Departement of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick - Winchester Health Department, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the Historic Resources Advisory Board, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. Response: Acknowledged. 10) Comment: Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000 base fee plus $100.00 per acre and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Response: Acknowledged. Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (540) 667-2139. Sincerely, PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. /� - - �.' Z. �Z" -, f � - Patrick R. Sowers Senior Project Engineer cc: John Bishop, AICP COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 October 23, 2015 Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates, Inc. 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Proposed Rezoning for Freedom Manor — Second Review Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 64-A-19, 64-A-20, 64-A-23 Dear Patrick: I have had the opportunity to review the revised draft rezoning application for the Freedom Manor property. This application seeks to rezone 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District and 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) to the RP (Residential) Performance District with proffers. Staff's review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Senseny/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The site is within the limits of the Senseny/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density) and high -density residential (12-16 units per acre). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis for phase 1 is shown at 3.4 units per acre and phase 2 at up to 14.4. While these densities and land uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan, there are no assurances that the area designated for high density area will develop as indicated. The development of the area with single family attached (townhouse) does not assure densities consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. 2. Development Impact Model. The proffer exempts 25 single family dwelling units from the monetary contribution outlined in the Development Impact Model. The impact statement shows that this is due to the existing RP zoning on the 6 acre portion of the property. However, due to the restrictive covenant regarding access, this area is not developable with the by -right density unless the RA zoned portion of the property is rezoned with this application. Therefore, the impact on County facilities for all residential units proposed with this development should be addressed with this rezoning because this impact wasn't previously present due to the property being undevelopable to a higher density. 3. Trail Location. The revised proffer now provides for bike lanes along the north/south connector road instead of separate trails. The adjacent development contains separate av\ - u- - It Page 2 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Freedom Manor October 23, 2015 trails that will connect into this development; separate 10' hiker/biker trails should be provided along the north/south connector road instead of bike lanes. 4. Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. 5. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick -Winchester Health Department, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the Historic Resources Advisory Board, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 6. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre for and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/pd IPIr-7 PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING LNGINLLRS August 31, 2015 Mr. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Area Land Use Engineer Virginia Department of Transportation 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 RE: Freedom Manor Responses to VDOT comments for Traffic Impact Analysis Dated October 28, 2014 Pennoni # DHOL1404 Dear Mr. Smith: Pennoni has revised the TIA for the subject site, Freedom Manor. The revisions reflect VDOT's correspondence with comments dated February 27, 2014. This letter is a formal response to the items contained in the VDOT comments to review the policy and technical elements associated with this resubmission. VDOT comments are shown in bold and Pennoni's responses are shown in italic for each of the comments: VDOT COMMENTS: The report does not include a concept plan of the proposed development of 1. the property. Please provide a scaled plan within the report that identifies the proposed layout of the site. The GDP is included as Figure 2A in lieu of a concept plan since the site is only in the rezoning phase. This was discussed and accepted with VDOT at the May 26 Engineer's Meeting in Edinburg. The background information / introduction section of the report should be 2. expanded to include the comprehensive plan land use designation for the property. The comprehensive plan land use designation for the property is shown in Figure 4A with the area north of Pa ermill Road planned in the "Eastern Frederick 13880 Dulles Corner Lane, Suite 100 • Herndon, VA 20171 • Ph: 703-449-6700 • Fx: 703-449-6714 www.pennoni.com August 31, 2015 Page 2 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis County Long -Term Land Use Plan" as residential to the south and high density residential to the north. Adjacent to the site, the plan shows residential to the east and high density residential to the northwest. On Page 8 of the report, the heading Route 522 (Front Royal Pike) & 3 Papermill Drive is mislabeled. This should be Route 522 and Justes Drive. Corrected. Page 9 of the revised report. The report analysis and associated rezoning proffers assume that the Madison Village development will be fully constructed by 2026 (prior to the issuance of the 150th dwelling unit per the proffers). What happens if this is not the case? VDOT recommends that the proffers should be revised to limit development of the property to Phase 1 only (100 single family 4. detached dwellings); until such time that the road improvements through the Madison Village development are complete. Unless an alternative site layout can be developed to provide an optional secondary access point (with analysis), a development restriction in the proffers is the only method of ensuring the necessary infrastructure is in place to support the development. With the suggested alternative roundabout at Papermill Road, the capacity is increased for site access. With the connection to Madison Village, we have assumed a trip distribution between the two projects that would send more trips through Freedom Manor. Accordingly, the 2026 build -out is actually a conservative estimate for the Papermill entrance. In the event that Madison Village is unable to make the connection allowing for the secondary access, the Papermill Road trips generated by Freedom Manor will be less than the counts used for the 2026 build out condition that assumes a connection with Madison Village. In addition, it is important to note that Madison Village was recently approved for up to 640 dwelling units on a single site entrance. No phasing limitations were placed on development of Madison Village that triggered a requirement for a secondary site entrance. The VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1) requires SIDRA to be used in the analysis of all roundabouts. The report only 5. includes Synchro analysis of the roundabout in the Madison Village development. Please update the report to provide the appropriate analysis for the roundabout. A separate roundabout analysis with SIDRA is provided for the revised site entrance. However, Pennoni noted in previous meetings that Synchro analysis for the roundabout within Madison Village should suffice since the Madison Village TIS (Painter Lewis PLC, June 27, 2013) provided Synchro analysis as well for the off -site location as part of their land entitlement approvals. Furthermore, the volumes through the roundabout are minimal at less than 10,000 v d on the legs August 31, 2015 Page 3 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis and there are no operational issues with all analysis years, as both background and total show overall LOS "A" and approach LOS "B" or better for both peak hours. There are some discrepancies throughout the report over what is actually being recommended for the right turn movement into the site entrance on Papermill Road. The 4th paragraph on Page 6 of the report indicates that a left turn lane and right turn taper are recommended with Phase 2. However, the Final Assessment on Page 8 states that separate left and right turn lanes will be provided at the site entrance on Papermill Road in the long-term. 6 Please clarify the recommendation and make it consistent throughout the report. Our analysis shows that due to the traffic volumes on Papermill Road in the 2020 PM peak hour, the left turn lane into the subdivision will be warranted with the first dwelling unit of the development. Therefore, VDOT recommends the construction of the full turn lanes on Papermill Road be installed prior to the occupancy of the first dwelling unit of Phase I. A left turn lane would require substantial transition lane distance on the northbound Papermill Rd approach that would encroach on the off -site properties, and therefore, Pennoni has engaged several iterations of alternatives including reviewing minimum left turn warrants with less than 50 DU on -site and coordination with the adjacent property owner's trustee to verify if R-O-W dedication would be available. As noted in previous meetings, the trustees of the Haldeman property (Tax Map 64-A-24) would not support partial dedications or easements to allow the widening to be shared between the property owners, at the cost of Freedom Manor, to reduce the length of road construction and fit along the Freedom Manor frontage. Even an option with a conventional 4 legged roundabout was not supported. A copy of the correspondence and owner representative response is included in the roundabout justification. Therefore, the access plan was revised to support an initial roundabout with a 140 ft inscribed diameter is proposed instead in the revised TIA, negating the need for turn lanes. The roundabout justification is provided separately. Based on the projected long-term volumes as a T intersection, the proposed design accommodates the project volumes with the full build -out of Freedom Manor, so additional turn lanes are not proposed with this revision. Route 522 is indicated as having a 45 mph posted speed limit within the project vicinity in the report and Synchro models. However, there is a 55 mph sign north of the site, heading south on Route 522. There does not 7. appear to be another speed limit sign prior to passing the intersection with Papermill Road (there is a 40 mph school zone within this stretch of Route 522). Please verify the posted speed limit and adjust the report and Synchro models accordingly. Verified and revised to 55 mph in the report and Synchro models. August 31, 2015 Page 4 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis The proffers indicate that 40' of right -or -way (20' additional) from the existing centerline will be dedicated across the property frontage to accommodate future widening of Papermill Road. This distance will not accommodate the Urban, 4-11ane divided road section as planned in the 8. Frederick County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. A minimum of 48' from the center line is required. This is assuming the 10' multi -use trail is located off right-of-way in public easement. Along the property frontage south of the proposed entrance, 60' from the centerline will be necessary to also accommodate the right turn lane into the development. The proffers have been revised to provide for a minimum of 56' of right of way as measured from the existing centerline of Papermill Road. If additional right of way is not required for the multi -use trail at time of final site design, then a public easement will be provided for use of the trail and the R-O-W will be reduced. The Bicycle, Pedestrian, and Transit Facilities section of the report on Page 13 should be updated to state that Papermill Road is designated for a 9. potential future bicycle facility per the Winchester, Frederick County MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. It should also state that a 10' multi -use trail is proffered across the property's Papermill Road frontage. Updated in Page 17 of the revised TIA. The report states that the VETTRA counts for Evandale Elementary from 10. 2005 are provided in Appendix B, but the counts do not appear to be included. Included in the revised TIA. The report indicates that all turn lane storage lengths include half of the taper distance. Please update all tables to provide storage lengths that only 11. include the full width storage lane and verify that there are no queuing issues as a result. Revised. The half taper has been removed from the tables to show only the full width storage lane lengths in the tables. Besides removing the half taper distance, all the existing storage lengths have been reviewed and, if necessary updated, for a more accurate analysis. The report does not include a proposed length for the recommended extension of the eastbound Papermill right turn lane onto Route 522. Please provide. Also, based on the recommendations it is not clear who will be 12 responsible for the recommended improvements at the Papermill Road / Route 522 intersection (these improvements are not proffered). Please clarify. August 31, 2015 Page 5 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Synchro analysis with a separate eastbound right turn lane, optimized network cycle lengths, offsets, and an eastbound right turn overlap phase, shows that 325 ft of storage would allow for sufficient storage and acceptable LOS D" for the eastbound approach under all future conditions. With site impacts at the intersection at less than 6 percent of the future traffic, as shown on Table 9A, the provision of a new roundabout on Papermill Road, and the off -site improvements required to mitigate background conditions, the requirement to construct as part of the Freedom Manor rezoning is not justified. The recommended right turn lane on Papermill Road into the development is 13. currently not included in the proffers. Please advise. Same response as response to comment #6. Provide an additional figure in the report that identifies the recommended 14. improvements. Added as Figure 3B in the revised TIA. 15. Preliminary cost estimates for the recommended improvements are not provided in the report. Included under the "Background Information" Section (3) as a subheading (c) on page 16 of the revised TIA: For planning budget purposes using the VDOT 2009 Planning and Mobility estimates (inflated at 3 percent annually to 2018), the proposed and suggested improvements could be budgeted as noted: - Roundabout construction at site entrance, estimated at $1,300,000 plus $200,000 for realigning approximately 180 ft of the southbound Papermill Road approach to the roundabout. - $1, 014, 500 for the main on -site roadway as a two-lane local street connection from Papermill Road to the interparcel connection to Madison Village. Additional off -site improvements suggested to improve existing, background, and total operations: - Extend eastbound Papermill Road right turn lane from 35 ft to 325 ft with 100 ft taper, including utility and R-O-W contingencies at 25% percent of the lane cost. This would equate to $925, 000. - Modification of the existing traffic signal operations at Route 522 & Papermill Road to add an eastbound right turn overlap phase, estimated at $5,000 for a 5- section signal head on eastbound approach, related rewiring, and assuming no structural upgrades of the northeast quadrant traffic signal pole. August 31, 2015 Page 6 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis - Restriping of the northbound left turn lane between Papermill Road and Justes Drive to increase left turn storage, estimated at $7, 000. Westwood Drive, serving the adjacent residential development to the east of the site, was planned for a future connection to the subject property. 16. Therefore, VDOT recommends that Freedom Manor should propose this connection between the two developments. Connection with Westwood Drive is not possible due to a restrictive covenant recorded in 2005 (Instrument #050023984) by the previous property owner. With the restrictive covenant in place, Freedom Manor is unable to provide a connection between the proposed development and the existing street. Verify that the Peak Hour Factors and Heavy Vehicle percentages entered in the existing year Synchro models match the traffic counts. There appears to 17. be some discrepancies. Also verify that the existing year Heavy Vehicle percentages are consistently carried through all future year Synchro models. Revised. The PHF and HV% discrepancies in the existing year Synchro models have been corrected and the existing HV%'s have been carried through all future year Synchro models. The VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1) requires 18. that a Peak Hour Factor of 0.92 be utilized for all movement in all future analysis. Please update all future year Synchro models accordingly. Revised. A PHF of 0.92 has now been utilized for all movements in all future analysis except when the existing PHF for a given approach was higher; in which case, the higher PHF was utilized instead, as recommended on page 46 of the VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1). None of the future year Synchro models include the improvements as recommended in the report (except the right turn overlap signal adjustment at the Papermill Road and Route 522 intersection). Please update the 2020 19. and 2026 models to include the Papermill Road eastbound right turn lane extension and update the 2026 models to include the left and right turn lanes on Papermill Road into the development. Synchro files with a 325 ft eastbound right turn lane (based on results of the revised capacity analyses) are included as alternatives with the submission of this revised TIA (file names with "2-Lane EB Analysis'). As noted earlier, a roundabout is suggested for the development entrance intersection with Papermill Road in the revised TIA, negating the need for left and ri ht turn lanes. The revised TIA contains SIDRA analysis for the proposed August 31, 2015 Page 7 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis roundabout. The VDOT Traffic Operations Analysis Tool Guidebook (Version 1.1) requires that signal timings be optimized in all future year analysis. The future year Synchro models are utilizing existing signal timings at the Route 522 / 20 Papermill Road and Route 522 / Justes Drive intersections. Please revise all future year models to coordinate all signals and then optimize the network cycle length. Updated. Signal timings for all future year traffic signals have been optimized and coordinated with each other (including the proposed signal at future Madison Village entrance on Route 522). The report indicates that there are no queuing issues in any of the Synchro models. However, simulations of the future year 2020 improved and 2026 improved models identify significant queuing delays at the eastbound 21. approach at the Papermill Road / Route 522 intersection. The queue is a result of not modeling the recommended right turn lane extension. Provide a recommended extension length for the right turn lane and update the models accordingly. As noted in the response to comment #19, Synchro files with a 325 ft eastbound right turn lane (based on results of the revised capacity analyses) are included as alternatives with the submission of this revised TIA (file names with "2-Lane EB Analysis'), and show that the additional storage would be sufficient for queueing and result in acceptable LOS "D" for all future conditions, without the site. The turn lane is not recommended for construction with the subject site, since the deficiencies are associated with existing traffic and growth, so the improvement is shown as an alternative to achieve desirable LOS. Please review and advise if acceptable for approval. The CD's provided to VDOT include a PDF of the report and the Synchro and SIDRA analysis files. As always, we thank you in advance for your coordination on this project. Please feel free to contact me at (703) 840-4830 with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Pennoni Associates, Inc. " 4^-�J Douglas R. Kennedy, PE Associate Vice President August 31, 2015 Page 8 Mr. Matthew B. Smith/ VDOT Freedom Manor Revised Traffic Impact Analysis Enclosures: cc: VAPROJECTS\DHOL\1404-Freedom Manor\DOCUMENTS\REPORTS\TIA\DHOL1404_TIA Comments Responses_2015 08.docx COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/665-6395 February 2, 2015 Mr. Patrick Sowers Pennoni Associates, Inc. 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Proposed Rezoning for Freedom Manor Property Identification Numbers (PINS): 64-A-19, 64-A-20, 64-A-23 Dear Patrick: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Freedom Manor property. This application seeks to rezone 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District and 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) to the RP (Residential) Performance District with proffers. Staff's review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Senseny/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The site is within the limits of the Senseny/Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan. The plan shows the area where this site is located with a residential (4 units per acre density) and high -density residential (12-16 units per acre). The proposed density shown in the impact analysis for phase 1 is shown at 3.4 units per acre and phase 2 at up to 14.4. While these densities and land uses are consistent with the comprehensive plan, there are no assurances that the area designated for high density area will develop as indicated. 2. Minimum Units. The Phase 2 area should include a proffer for a minimum density to ensure compliance with the high density residential designation in the comprehensive plan. Statements regarding the use of single family detached through TDR's in phase 2 should be removed as TDR's can be utilized for attached and multifamily units. The proffer as currently worded, allowing the single family detached in phase 2 would greatly reduce the density and would then not conform with the comprehensive plan. 3. Site Development. Proffer 1.1 includes a statement regarding the use of TDR's in phase 2. Phase 2 would be developed for single family attached or apartment units "unless developed for single family detached dwellings under the County's Transfer of Development Rights Ordinance as provided for by proffer 5.1". Please note that TDR's can be utilized for all housing types, not only single family detached. A calculator is included in the TDR ordinance for the development of attached/multifamily units. If there is a desire to construct detached units in phase 2 it should be included in the permissible housing types Page 2 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Freedom Manor February 2, 2015 and the "unless" statement removed along with a minimum density or unit number (not maximum). 4. Proffer 5.1. The need for the statement "At the applicant's sole discretion, any dwelling units constructed in Phase 2 that utilize the TDR Ordinance may be single family detached dwelling units" is unclear. Inclusion of the option to utilize TDR's for any of the 300 proposed units appears sufficient. 5. Development Impact Model. The proffer exempts 25 single family dwelling units from the monetary contribution outlined in the Development Impact Model. The impact statement shows that this is due to the existing RP zoning on the 6 acre portion of the property. However, due to the restrictive covenant regarding access, this area is not developable with the by -right density unless the RA zoned portion of the property is rezoned with this application. Therefore, the impact on County facilities for all residential units proposed with this development should be addressed with this rezoning. 6. Trail Location. The 10' trail is shown along the property lines on the GDP and in the proffer. Within the Madison Village development the trail runs along the roadway, therefore if developed as proposed someone coming from Madison Village network would transition away from the main roadway and onto a private trail within the open space and then to Papermill Road. The trail should go along the main road within the development and include a trail through the area that connects to Route 522. 7. Shenandoah Memorial Park Buffer. The proffer statement from 2005 contained a proffer for a 50' distance buffer with landscaping and a 6' iron type fence along the cemetery boundary. The new proffer statement eliminates all of these commitments. The new application should include some form of buffer landscaping and the installation of the fence. 8. Transportation Comments. Please note that transportation comments on the rezoning application from John Bishop, Deputy Director of Transportation, are being provided to you in a separate letter. 9. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick -Winchester Health Department, Frederick County Public Schools, the local Fire and Rescue Company, the Historic Resources Advisory Board, the County Attorney and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 10. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008, the rezoning fee for this application includes a $10,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre for and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Page 3 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Freedom Manor February 2, 201S All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, AICP Senior Planner CEP/pd e50023984 Tax Map ID: 84-((A)�1 B CD Preperod by Sean A Everhart, PLC N and Realm to: 158 Front Royal Pke, Su da 306C 1Mrxheater, Virginia 226U DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is made this 26 h day of September, 2005, by and among Steve A. DUBRJIELE Ray N. DUBRUELLER and Madeline F. DUBRUELER (hereinafter referred to as "Declarants"), the COOTY OF FREDERICK, Virginia (hereinafter referred to as "County'D, FIRST BANK, a Virginia Banking Corporation (hereinafter referred to as `Bank"), and Stephen G. RUTLE& TRUSTEE (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Declarants are the fee simple owners of certain real property lying and being situated two miles south of the City of Winchester, in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, containing 2.2021 acres, more or less, and further identified as Tax Parcel No. 64- A-19 (the "Property"); WHEREAS, Declarants desire to impose a restrictive covenant on the Property regarding access to Route 822 (Westwood Drive); WHEREAS, Bank is the beneficiary of two Notes, each secured partially or wholly by the Property, and evidenced by two deeds of trust recorded as Instrument Numbers 020018297 (modified in Instrument 040024652) and 050005350 among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia, and Trustee being the trustee under aforesaid deeds of trust; NOW, THEREFORE, Declarants hereby impose on the Property the following restrictive covenant: At such time the Frederick County Board of Supervisors approves the Freedom Manor Proffer Statement and Generalized Development Plan to allow for an inter - parcel connection that will provide access to the Property: (1) there shall be no entrances from or across the Property from Route 822 (Westwood Drive) and (2) there shall be no access across the Property to Route 822 for the benefit of any other property and no other property shall have access across the Property to Route 822. This Restrictive Covenant shall run to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the County. This Restrictive Covenant shall run with, and be appurtenant to, the Property, and shall be binding upon the Declarants, their heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns. The Bank and Trustee join in the execution of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to evidence their consent and approval of the placement of the restrictive covenant on the Property, Pape 1 of 6 WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES) AND SEAL.(S): Q 1V a - '�-- -- (SEAL) teve A. DuBrueler i1� (SEAL) Ray N. DuBmeler N"- t a ' j.Qu �1-t��/ (SEAL) Madeline F. DuBrueler COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGR" COUNTY OF FREDERICK, to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned V* diction, by Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DaBrueler, and MadeHne F. DuBrueler, this day of r, , 2005. otary Public My Commission Expires: NIIII Page 2 of 5 d (V FIRST BANK, a Virginia Banking Corporation By: '—Q W e_.. (SEAL) Earl W. Foreman, Vice President COMMONWEALTH OF VIR01NIA ULtnT1yV OF Feebetic,k. eFFY!Fi'weminn, to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdictinoby Earl W. Foreman, Vice President of First Bank, a Vlrgh" Banking Corporation, this - -� i day of September, 2005. •"",,,µllllllly4j Notary Public U•� My Commission Expires-. Pape 3 of a N fY � (SEAL) Stephen G. bider, Tmacue' COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF WINCIRSTM to wit, The l6goh* Decluidoa of Restrictive Covenaw was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforeaaaotionad judsdicdoq by Stepbiea G. Bider. Trot , tbis _ day of Septmber, 2005. Atmoa Notary Public My C==xsm Pm*40s COUNTY OF FREDERIM VIRGESIA C7 N X.c- By: (SEAL) w Joh6A. Riley Jr., County dmirustrator COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF WINCHESTER, to wit: t , The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before ire; a Notafy " Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction y John R. Riley Jr., County Admiatrtr**or fi8 *,m County of Frederick, Virginia, this day of Copbwtber, 2005. 6r- oler do Public My Commission Expires: Aoay VIRGINIA• FREDERICK COUNTY SCI' this instrument of wryye�+�Was produced to me on -it),( rt . at. of tcKnO IZO, mcnt t:,CtUo nrr.0 ced adt tied to r, •utd T in e-Wt d by See 5S 1.802 of ;d ',t 1. 01 nave tkx:n paid if ,mc,wble Paps 5 of 5 0 AINIENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: July 6, 2005 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: September 14, 2005 APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TIIE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING #09-05 OF FREEDOM MANOR WHEREAS, Rezoning #09-05 oi' Fiwdom Alanol', was submitted to rezone 26.87 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District for 70 single family detached homes. The property fronts on the east side of PapermiIMoad (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet Nvest-northwest of the intersection of Papermill Road (Route 644) and Front Royal Pike (Route 522), in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and is identified by Property Identification Number (PIN) 64-A-23. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on .1uly 6, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on September 14, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 26.87 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District for 70 single family detached homes, as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRes 1`33-05 • This ordinance shall be in effect on the. date of adoption. Passed this l4th day of September, 2005 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Barbara E. Van Osten Aye Gina A. Forrester Nay Gary Dove Aye Lynda J. Tyler Nay Bill M. Ewing Aye Gene Fisher Aye A COPY ATTEST John R. Ri*y,'Jr. Frederick County Administrator PDRes 933-05 V. DEED & REZONING BOUNDARY L Michael L. Bryan 16 S. Braddock St. inchester, VA 110009282 THIS TRUSTEE'S DEED, made and dated this 18`' day of October, 2011 by and between GREGORY W. BOWMAN, TRUSTEE, party of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantor, whose address is 203 East Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601; and SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantee. REcrrALS: A. By Deed of Trust dated October 24, 2002, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument No. 020018297, as modified from time to time, Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler and Madeline F. DuBrueler did convey the following described property to Stephan W. Milo and Stephen G. Butler, Trustees, in trust to secure the payment of a certain Deed of Trust Note dated October 24, 2002 in the original principal sum of $566,250.00 made by Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler and Madeline F. DuBrueler, and payable to the First Bank; and, B. By Deed of Appointment of Substitute Trustee dated August 2, 2011, of' record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No. 110006701, Gregory W. Bowman was appointed as Trustee in the place and stead of Stephan W. Milo and Stephen G. Butler; and. C. Default was made in the repayment of said indebtedness, and notice of default, acceleration and sale duly given to said Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler and Madeline IF. DuBrueler, in compliance with the terms of the said Deed of Trust and as required by law; hand, D. Notice of this sale, as required by Section 55-59.1 of the Code of Virginia, as Iamended, has been given by the Trustee; and, E. The Deed of Trust provided for sale by the Trustee in the event of default in the payment of the debt secured, and there was default in the payment of the installments of the debt as and when due, and at the request of the beneficiary of the trust, who is the holder of the indebtedness, the Substitute Trustee did thereupon declare all of the debts and obligations secured by the Deed of Trust at once due and payable, and proceeded to advertise property for sale at public auction by newspaper advertisements on September 24, 2011, tober 1, 2011, October 8, 2011 and October 15, 2011 in The Winchester Star, a newspaper O O WITNESS the following signature an— i (SEAL) GREGORY W. BOWMAN Substitute Trustee STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE, City of Winchester, To -Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State and City aforesaid, this 18" day of October, 2011, by Gregory W. Bowman, Substitute Trustee. J My commission expires -7 1.3, I � NOTA Y PUBLICI 'PHIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: Michael L. Bryan, Esquire Bryan & Coleman, P.L.C. 116 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 MLn/porn c lrorccloswcOunrucicr Dccd 10/6/ll Michael L. Bryan `6 S. Braddock St. 'inchester, VA VIRGINIA: IRcDERICK COUNTY.SCT. This instrurnent of writing was produced to me on -ai-an II at i/= O'9A*4 and wish certilwatc acknotl Icdgement thereto annexed was adnliticd to record. Ta..\ inlposcd by Sec. 58.1-802 of 53.5 6. 00and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. 4Lloa , Clerk c z Michael L. Bryan 116 S. Braddock St. 'Vinchester, VA 110009410 THIS TRUSTEE'S DFFD, made and dated this 18' day of October, 2011 by and between GREGORY W. BOWMAN, TRUSTEE, party of the first pan, hereinafter called the Grantor, whose address is 203 Bast Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601; and SlI N-VA[ I EY LAND HOLDINGS, LL( , a Virginia limited liability company, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantee. RF,CITALS: A. By Deed of Trust dated December 30, 2003, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument No. 030029418, as modified from time to time, Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler and Madeline F. DuBrueler did convey the following described property to Michael L. Bryan and Stephen G. Butler, Trustees, in trust to secure the payment of a certain Deed of Trust Note dated December 30, 2003 in the original principal sum of$270,000.00 made by Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler and Madeline F. DuBrueler, and payable to the First Bank; and, B. By Deed of Appointment of Substitute Trustee dated August 2, 2011, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No. 110006700, Gregory W. Bowman was appointed as Trustee in the place and stead of Michael L. Bryan and Stephen G. Butler; and, C. Default was made in the repayment of said indebtedness, and notice of default, II acceleration and sale duly given to said Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler and Madeline F. DuBrueler, in compliance with the terms of the said Deed of "trust and as required by law; and, D. Notice of this sale, as required by Section 55-59.1 of the Code of Virginia, as amended, has been given by the Trustee; and, E. The Deed of Trust provided for sale by the Trustee in the event of default in the payment of the debt secured, and there was default in the payment of the installments of the debt as and when due, and at the request of the beneficiary of the trust, who is the holder of the indebtedness, the Substitute Trustee did thereupon declare all of the debts and secured by the Deed of'lTrust at once due and payable, and proceeded to advertise property for sale at public auction by newspaper advertisements on October 1, 2011, 8, 2011, October 15, 2011 and October 17, 2011 in The Winchester Star, a 0 0 J CC WITNESS the following signature and seal: SEAL) GREGORY W. BOWMAN Substitute Trustee STATE OF VIRGfN1A, AT LARGE, City of Winchester, To -Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in and for the State and City aforesaid, this 18" day of October, 2011, by Gregory W. Bowman, Substitute Trustee. My commission expires NOTA Y PUBLIC THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY: Michael L. Bryan, Esquire Bryan & Coleman, P.L.C. 116 South Braddock Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 t.tt.B/pmn c Torcclosur6l)unrueler Dced #2 10/5/II VIRGINIA: FREDI'RICK COUN"I'Y.SCT. This instrument of Writing %vas produced to me on and \eith certiliccttc acknoNvIc4cment thereto annexed tins admitIell to record. Tax imposed by Sec. 5h.1-802 of 00 $ � Sop • ,and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable. xege",' /) J-6� ' Clerk Michael L. Br3an I t6 S. Braddock St. Vinchester, VA VI. TAX TICKETS 0 FiLdcrick !lame Virginia! Pay/Lookup 'Taxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous , 2015 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticket// RE2015 / 353810001 Frequency 1 Supplement# 0 Name SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC Map/1 64 A 19 Account# 8020628 Name 2 C/O FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEF Bill Date 04/14/2015 Acreage Address 1835 VALLEY AVE Due Date 06/05/2015 Improvements WINCHESTER VA Desc 2.20 ACRES Land Value Zip 22601 6303 Land Use Minerals 2.200 S0 00 S18,300 00 So.00 S0.00 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid S0.00 Last Transaction Date 06/02/2015 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principle Balance Due Penalty Interest Balance Due $51.24 ($51.24) $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 $0.00 i 'Il•ansaction History i i Date Type Transaction# Amount Balance 4/14/2015 Charge 0 S51.24 S51.24 6/2/2015 Principle Paid 20029 (S51.24) S0.00 s i Previous Frederick Ilome Virginia Pay/Lookup 'fates Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous , 2015 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticketll RE2015 / 353820001 Frequency 1 Supplement# 0 Name SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC Mapt/ 64 A 20 Account# 8020629 Name 2 C/O FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEF Bill Date 04/14/2015 Acreage 18.470 Address 1835 VALLEY AVE Due Date 06/05/2015 Improvements $0.00 WINCHESTER VA Desc 18.47 ACRES Land Value S177,300.00 Land Use $0.00 Zip 22601 6303 Minerals S0.00 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Last Transaction Date 06/02/2015 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principle Balance Due Penalty Interest Balance Due $496.44 ($496.44) $ 0.00 $ 0.00 S0.00 $ 0.00 I Transaction history Date 'I'ype Transaction# Amount Balance 4/14/2015 Charge 0 S496.44 S496.44 I 6/2/2015 Principle Paid 20029 ($496.44) S0.00 Previous Fiedenck Home ( Virginia Pay/Lookup 'Faxes Payment Home Personal Property Real Estate Dog Tags Pay Parking Violation Other Payments ShoppingCart(0) Pin Options Change Email Real Estate Ticket Detail Previous 2015 REAL ESTATE Dept/Ticketll RE2015 / 353830001 Frequency 1 Supplement# 0 Name SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC Mapll 64 A 23 Account# 8020631 Name 2 C/O FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEF Bill Date 04/14/2015 Acreage 26870 Address 1835 VALLEY AVE Due Date 06/05/2015 Improvements So 00 WINCHESTER VA Desc 26.87 ACRES Land Value S675,90000 Land Use S0.00 Zip 22601 6303 Minerals S0 00 Penalty Paid $0.00 Interest Paid $0.00 Last Transaction Date 06/02/2015 Current Payment Status Original Bill Payments Principle Balance Due Penalty Interest Balance Due S1,892.52 ($1,892.52) $0.00 $0.00 S0.00 S0 00 Transaction History Date 'Type 'Transaction# Amount Balance 4/14/2015 Charge 0 SI,892.52 S1,892.52 j 6/2/2015 Principle Paid 20029 (S1,892.52) S0.00 j Previous 1 � Frederick County, Virginia REZONING APPLICATION MATERIALS FOR RI?VII1.W 011, FREEDOM MANOR Shawnee Magisterial District November 2015 Prepared by: Pennoni Associates Inc. 117 1 Piccadilly Street Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone: 540-667-2139 Fax: 540-665-0493 7 Pennoni PENNON[ ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS iI 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Application II. Impact Analysis Appendix A —Traffic Impact Analysis Appendix 13 — Roundaboutjustification Study III. Proffer Statement IV. Agency Comments V. Deed and Rezoning Boundary VI. Tax Tickets 10 0 I. APPLICATION 1,; A�AMMA'q PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS MEMORANDUM TO: Candice Perkins, AICP FROM: Patrick Sowers DATE: November 6, 2015 SUBJECT: Freedom Manor Rezoning Application Please find attached the complete application materials for the Freedom Manor rezoning, including application fee in the amount of $14,804.15, agency comments, signed application form, signed proffer statement, impact analysis statement including traffic impact analysis, deed and rezoning boundary, and tax tickets for the subject parcels. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (540) 667-2139. 117 East Piccadilly Street • Winchester, VA 22601 • Ph: 540-667-2139 • Fx: 540-665-0493 www.pennoni.com Greenway Engineering Mny 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 Freedom Manor Rezoning October 7, 20011; February 25, 2005 May 18, 2005; June 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 FREEDOM MANOR PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ# 09-05 Rural Areas (RA) District to Residential Performance (RP) District PROPERTY: 26.87-acres +/- (lierc-in after the "PROPERTY") Tax Parcel 64-((A))-23 RECORD OWNER: Steve A. DuBrueler et als APPLICANT: Steve A. DuBrueler et als (here -in after the "APPLICANTS") PROJECT NAME: FREEDOM MANOR ORIGINAL DATE May 28, 2004 OF PROFFERS: REVISION DATE: August 10, 2005 Pi-elinihiary Alatters Pursuant to Section 15.2-2296 Et. Seq. of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned Applicants hereby proffer that in the event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve Rezoning Application # 09-05 for the rezoning of 26.87f-acres from the Rural Areas (RA) District Residential Performance (RP) District, development of the subject property shall be done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in accordance with the said Code and Zoning Ordinance. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and have no effect whatsoever. These proffers shall be binding upon these Applicants and their legal successors, heirs, or assigns. The subject property, identified as Freedom Manor, and more particularly described as the lands owned by Steve A. DuBrueler et als, being all of Tax Map Parcel 64-((A))-23. The property is shown by plat and survey dated January 9, 2002 and revised July 24, 2003, prepared by Mark D. Smith, L.S., of Greenway Engineering, entitled "Final Plat for Minor Rural Subdivision of the Land Standing in the Name of Doris F. Casey" and recorded as Instrument Number 030029417. File ,/3230/EAw T Greenway Engineering May 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 Freedom Manor Rezoning October 7, 2004; February 25, 2005 May 18, 2005; June 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 A. Generalized Development Plan The Applicants hereby proffer to develop the Property in substantial conformity with the Generalized Development Plan prepared by Greenway Engineering and dated 4/20/05, a copy of which is attached. The Generalized Development Plan is intended to delineate the road systems that will serve the 70 single-family detached urban lots, the general location of road efficiency buffer, the Shenandoah Memorial Park buffer, and the bicycle and pedestrian trail facility. B. Residential Use Restriction 1. The Applicants hereby proffer that the Property shall be used for the development of Single -Family Detached Urban Residences only, and all other housing types otherwise pennitted in the RP zoning district shall be prohibited. developed as single-family detached urban residential lots. 2. The Applicants hereby proffer to limit the total number of single-family detached dwelling units to 70 on the Property. C. Transportation 1. Site Access The Applicants hereby proffer to provide access to the Property through the construction of a primary entrance on Paperinill Road (Route 644) and a secondary entrance on Front Royal Pike (Route 522). The Applicants shall be responsible for the construction of the internal road improvements and for the construction of all off -site improvements located on Tax Map Parcel 64-((A))- 23A. The internal road improvements and construction of all off -site improvements located on Tax Map Parcel 64-((A))-23A shall be constructed to base asphalt and open for public use prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the Freedom Manor Subdivision. Furthermore, the Applicants shall provide for a temporary cul-de-sac at the northern property boundary to allow for future inter -parcel connection to Tax Map parcel 64-A-19. The entrances, internal road system and temporary cul-de-sac described above are depicted on the proffered Generalized Development Plan exhibit for Freedom Manor. 2. Traffic Calming Measures and Route 522 Connection The Applicants hereby proffer to implement a curvilinear street design for the internal street system serving the 26.87-acre site to discourage cut through traffic between Front Royal Pike (Route 522 South) and Papennill Road (Route 644). Furthermore, the Applicants hereby proffer to design a traffic chocker for review and approval by VDOT, and then construct the traffic choker between the Front Royal Pike entrance and the residential lots that will be located on Tax Map File #3230/EAW Greemvay Engineering lvlay 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 Freedom Manor Rezoning October 7, 2004; February 25, 2005 May 18, 2005; June 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 Parcel 64-((A))-23A. Additionally, a right turn and taper lane will be designed and constructed to this entrance within the Front Royal Pike right-of-way that will be open for public use prior to the issuance of the first building permit within the Freedom Manor Subdivision. 3. Elimination of Westwood Drive Connection The Applicants hereby proffer that they will not make a road connection to Westwood Drive (Route 822). This guarantee will be achieved through a deed restriction upon the pertinent property, identified as Tax Map 64-((A))-19 and currently owned by the Applicants, a copy of which is attached. The Applicants will legally record this road connection restriction within 30 days of final rezoning approval and prior to any development activity on the Property to ensure that this restriction appears in the chain of title for Tax Map parcel 64-A-19. 4. Papermill Road Dedication The Applicants proffer a right-of-way dedication of twenty -feet in width along the entire Papermill Road fi•ontage on the Property. 5. Offsite Road Contribution The Applicants hereby proffer to contribute seven thousand dollars ($7,000) per unit for offsite road improvements to Papermill Road, including the realignment of the Papermill Road and Front Royal Pike intersection and other associated Papermill Road improvements. The contribution will be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County, Virginia for each residential lot that is platted. This monetary contribution is to be paid at the time of the building permit issuance for each residential lot. 6. Revenue Sharing All of the monies paid pursuant to above itern 5, Papermill Road Improvements, together with the property value of land dedicated as public road right-of-way through above item 4, Papermill Road Dedication shall be eligible for inclusion in the Frederick County contribution to an applicable highway improvement revenue sharing project. D. Shenandoah Memorial Park Buffer The Applicants hereby proffer to provide a fifty -foot (50') buffer along the entire southern property line against the Shenandoah Memorial Park. The fifty -foot (50') buffer will not contain any portion of residential lots developed within the Property. A fence that is a minimum of six feet (6') in height, resembling a traditional iron fence style for cemetery enclosures will be constructed within the File t}3230/EA\V Greenway Engineering May 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 Freedom Manor Rezoning October 7, 2004; February 25, 2005 May 18, 2005; June 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 buffer along the shared Shenandoah Memorial Park property line. A bicycle and pedestrian trail facility will be constructed within a twenty -foot (20') non- exclusive easement, located adjacent to this fence. In the remaining thirty-foot (30') portion of the buffer, a single row of evergreen trees will be planted on ten - foot (10') centers. E. Papermill Road (Route 644) Road Efficiency Buffer Easement Within the required road efficiency buffer the applicants hereby proffer to provide a twenty -foot (20') non-exclusive easement for the development of a bicycle and pedestrian facility within the established fifty -foot (50') road efficiency buffer along Papermill Road (Route 644). F. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility The Applicants hereby proffer to construct a ten -foot (10') wide asphalt bicycle and pedestrian facility within the twenty -foot (20') non-exclusive easement as stated in Proffers D and E above. The maintenance of this facility shall initially be the responsibility of the homeowners' association, and will be available for dedication to the Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation if requested in writing by Frederick County. G. Monetary Contribution to Offset'Impact of Development The undersigned owners of the above -described property hereby voluntarily proffer that in the event rezoning application # 09-05 is approved, the undersigned will pay to the Treasurer of Frederick County, Virginia $9,845 for each residential lot that is platted. This monetary contribution is to be paid at the time of the building permit issuance for each residential lot. H. Monetary Contribution to Establish Homeowners' Association Fund The Applicants hereby proffer to establish a start-up fund for the Freedom Manor Homeowner's Association (FMHOA) in the amount of $500.00 for each platted lot within the Freedom Manor community, of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the FMHOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the FMHOA Deed of Dedication and Restrictive Covenant Document that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility fi-orn the developer to the FMHOA. The start-up funds for the FMHOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. File 11t3230/EA W Greenway Engineering May 28, 2004; Revised July 28, 2004 Freedom Manor Rezoning October 7, 2004; February 25, 2005 May 18, 2005; June 16, 2005 July 15, 2005; August 10, 2005 I.) Signatures The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns and successors in the interest of the applicant and owner. In the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grants this rezoning and accepts the conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code. Respectfully Submitted: Y Steve A. DuBrueler Date By: y N. DuBrueler Date By: A u-, W c I Madeline F. DuBrueler Date Commonwealth of Virginia, City/County of 1'1" r' , C , C L- To Wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this = day of 20 C by ,h:'t'c 1. )cr'r_ii LfC iC.. c c Not lic M Commission Expires C > YL , j-T- File #3230/EA W 5 FURE-ACCESS.;OAD ... 64-((A))-20 i f u --PROFFE RESTRICT.L,.. -.SS C / TOWESTV\�- DRIVE, < WESY OD DRIVE �0 T.M. 64-((A )19 Oate.. T VINE ICE T.M.64-((A))-2Zi J c; s .•� ' w z IL <.� 0 Y ROAD Err.;'.EN'CY BUFF - ND --- - �:: i7i��'"�J ~ Z w BICYCLE i,N_P:=DESTRIAN r.- "LITY w m Q o �—TRAFFIC CHOKER W 2 NOCAH MEAL: PARK — Q W p O F BUf-r:_i2 AND BICYCLE . LaUre)WOOd Drive PEDESi:I:,r: FACILITY w Z NJ wN Da w° 0:< IL w w z w < � w u, Z " 3 a x y w+c u:oa Shenandoah MHP 0 u. XAI f10 J]l0 a Tax Map ID: 64-((A))-19 Prepared by Sean A. Everhart, PLC and Return to: 158 Front Royal Pike, Suite 305C Winchester, Virginia 22602 DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT THIS DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT is made this 26`h day of September, 2005, by and among Steve A. DUBRUELER, Ray N. DUBRUELER, and Madeline F. DUBRUELER (hereinafter referred to as "Declarants"), the COUNTY OF FREDERICK, Virginia- (hereinafter referred to- as "County"-), FIR-S-T- BANK, -a Virginia -Banking Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Bank"), and Stephen G. BUTLER. TRUSTEE (hereinafter referred to as "Trustee"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Declarants are the fee simple owners of certain real property lying and being situated two miles south of the City of Winchester, in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, containing 2.2021 acres, more or less, and further identified as Tax Parcel No. 64- A-19 (the "Property"); WHEREAS, Declarants desire to impose a restrictive covenant on the Property regarding access to Route 822 (Westwood Drive); WHEREAS, Bank is the beneficiary of two Notes, each secured partially or wholly by the Property, and evidenced by two deeds of trust recorded as Instrument Numbers 020018297 (modified in Instrument 040024652) and 050005350 among the land records of Frederick County, Virginia, and Trustee being the trustee under aforesaid deeds of trust; NOW, THEREFORE, Declarants hereby impose on the Property the following restrictive covenant: At such time the Frederick County Board of Supervisors approves the Freedom Manor Proffer Statement and Generalized Development Plan to allow for an inter - parcel connection that will provide access to the Property: (1) there shall be no entrances from or across the Property from Route 822 (Westwood Drive) and (2) there shall be no access across the Property to Route 822 for the benefit of any other property and no other property shall have access across the Property to Route 822. This Restrictive Covenant shall run to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the County. This Restrictive Covenant shall run with, and be appurtenant to, the Property, and shall be binding upon the Declarants, their heirs, personal representatives, successors, and assigns. The Bank and Trustee join in the execution of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to evidence their consent and approval of the placement of the restrictive covenant on the Property. Page 1 of 5 WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURES) AND SEAL(S): _ (SEAL) Steve A. DuBrueler ✓� G. �i) • L)14� (SEAL) Ray N. DuBrueler 0 - � 0ULt`t (/ (SEAL) Madeline F. DuBrueler COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK, to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned ju'sdiction, by Steve A. DuBrueler, Ray N. DuBrueler, and Madeline F., DuBrueler, this �� day of aber, 2005. UG��G✓ otary Public My Commission Expires: Page 2 of 5 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING December 30, 2015 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #1 1-15 FOR FREEDOM MANOR On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, January 13, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #11-15 of Freedom Manor, submitted by Pennoni Associates, to rezone 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District and 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) to the RP (Residential Performance) with proffers. The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644), in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 64-A-23, 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.fcva.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner CEP/pd 107 North KCnt Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING December 30, 2015 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #1 1-15 FOR FREEDOM MANOR On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, January 13, 2016, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #11-15 of Freedom Manor, submitted by Pennoni Associates, to rezone 13.8596 acres fi-om the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District and 33.6819 acres fi-om the RP (Residential Performance) to the RP (Residential Performance) with proffers. The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 north/west of the existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644), in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 64-A-23, 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.fcva.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner CEP/pd 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 9 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on 12 -zok C5 fI-on-i the DepaI•tment of PlaIning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 64 - A- - 23- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 -3- - A- SHENANDOAH MEMORIAL PARK INC 311 VETERANS HWY STE B LEVITTOWN PA 19056.1422 64 - A- - 24- HALDEMAN PAUL M JR TRUSTEE FIRST BANK TRUSTEE PO BOX 2751 WINCHESTER VA 22604 63 - A- - 146- BREEDLOVE THOMAS W BREEDLOVE MABEL 3575 PAPERMILL RD WINCHESTER VA 63 - A• - 145- GROVE EUGENE F 332 W PARKINS MILL RD WINCHESTER VA 64 - A- - 18- MADISON If LLC 558 BENNYS BEACH RD FRONT ROYAL VA 22630.6963 64D - A- - 3. PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- - 7. GARY DARLENE GOOD ETALS 1048 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D . A• - 12. MYERS FRANKLIN L SR 1071 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4423 64D . A• . 12- MYERS FRANKLIN L SR 22602 4448 1071 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4735 63 . A• - 124- EFG INVESTMENTS LLC 340 W PARKINS MILL RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.4735 22602.4423 Candice T. Perkins, Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COU T-- Or FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, o tereby certify that Candice C. Perkins, Senior Planner lot- th Department of Planning and Development, whose name Is signed to the foregoing, dated /�:2 3 U / 5- , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in m}, State and County aforesaid. l Given under my hand this �� U —day of My commission expires on PAMALA DEETER NOTARY PUBLIC REGISTRATION N 364474 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA M COMMISSION DECEM ER 31 EXPIRES2017 1 NOTARY PUBLIC 64D - A- - 10- WHITACRE ASAKO 101 HARRIS LN YORKTOWN VA 23692.4829 64D -2-A. 11- SWAIN RAYMOND JR SWAIN KATHRYN B 132 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A. 15- DRIVER JOHN L DRIVER CAROL W 112 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A. 9- PRATT ERIC W PRATT ALLISON 125 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 7- SALES JERRY A SALES THERESA L 117 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 1- B- A- MANUEL WADE R MANUEL CAROL L 207 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 6- ANDERSON JOHNNY H 197 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 5- BROOKS PAUL D BROOKS WILLENE C 187 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 4- MIDKIFF BARBARA L 179 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - A- - 28- MADIGAN ROXANNE LOUISE 131 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4464 64D - A- - 27- REID LEWIS E REID SANDRA L 1154 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602 64D - 8. 1- 1A- RED FOX RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC DEBRA M POTTER REG AGENT 907 JASMINE ST CELEBRATION FL 34747.4618 64 -2- - D2- HERNANDEZ JOSE D HERNANDEZ ESTANISLAO 102 ORION CT WINCHESTER VA 22602-7645 64D - A- - 30- CROSS ANN S TRUSTEE 1170 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4411 64 - A- - 23-A 22602.4461 WILISCH ROBIN CASEY 21 PEYTON ST WINCHESTER VA 22601.4837 22602.4465 22602.4464 22602.4464 22602.4464 64D - 2- A- 3- MAYHEW RAYMOND H MAYHEW E JEAN 366 SINGHASS RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.2137 64D - 2- - 2- DODD BRENDA S TRUSTEE 155 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4464 64D - 2- A- 1- LARGENT ROBERT M LARGENT PATSY 0 141 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4464 Easy Peel® Labels A I � I Bend along line to �AVERY®5161® Use Avery© Template 51610 Feed Pape "— r j expose Pop-up EdgeTM 64 - A- - 20- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - A- - 20- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - A- - 19- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - A- - 19- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 \A- - 20- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - A- - 20- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - A- - ,19- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - A- - 19- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC CIO FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 ttiquettes faciles A peter A ; Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY© 51610 Sens de chargement rev6ler le rebord Pop-upMC 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel© Labels Use Avery© Template 51610 Feed Paper -" 64D - A- - 4- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602-4410 64D - A• - 4- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A• - 5- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- - 5- \\ PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOP ENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A• - 8- GARDARLENE GOOD ETALS 1048 F ONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 640 - A• - 8-\ GARY DARLENE GOD ETALS 1048 FRONT ROY I `I\IKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 Bend along line to �AVERV05161® expose Pop-up Edger"' 64D - A- - 4- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- - 4- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- - 5- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- - 5- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA \ • 22602.4410 64D - A- - 8- GARY DARLENE GOOD ETALS 1048 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WING ESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- GARY DARLENE G OD ETALS 1048 FRONT ROYAL\7IKE WINCHESTER- \ 22602.4410 ttiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 51610 Sens de chargement Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com rev6ler le rebord Pop-up" 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel© Labels Use Avery® Template 51610 Feed Paper 64D - A- - 14- MYERS FRANKLIN L SR 1071 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602-4423 64D - A. - 14-\ MYERS FRANKLIN,L SR 1071 FRONT ROYAL PI �(E WINCHESTER VA \ 22602.4423 64D - 2- A- 12- SWAIN RAYMOND JR SWAIN KATHRYN B 132 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A- 12- SWAIN RAYMOND JR SWAIN KATHRYN B 132 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 Bend along line to �AVrERV051610 expose Pop-up Edge"m J 64D - A- - 14- MYERS FRANKLIN L SR 107.1 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4423 64D - A- - 14- MYERS FRANKLIN L SR 1071 FRONT ROYAL PIKE,,.,, WINCHESTER VA 22602.4423 64D - 2- A- 12- SWAIN RAYMOND JR SWAIN KATHRYN B 132 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A- 12- SWAIN RAYMOND JR SWAIN KATHRYN B 132 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 ttiquettes faciles a peler ® Repliez a la hachure afin de www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY© 51610 Sens de chargement r6v6ler le rebord Pop-up'A` 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel® Labels A ® I Bend along line to S AVIERV@51610Use Avery® Template 51610 Feed Paper --- Iexpose Pop-up EdgeT'^Al 64D - 2- A- 10- 64D -2-A- 10- PRATT ERIC W PRATT ERIC W PRATT ALLISON PRATT ALLISON 125 WESTWOOD CIR 125 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D -2-A- 10- 64D - 2- A- 10- PRATT ERIC W PRATT ERIC W PRATT ALLISON PRATT ALLISON 125 WESTWOOD CIR 125 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A- 8- 64D - 2- A- 8- SALES JERRY A SALES JERRY A SALES THERESA L SALES THERESA L 117 WESTWOOD CIR 117 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A- 8- 64D - 2- A- 8- SALES JERRY A SALES JERRY A SALES THERESA L SALES THERESA L 117 WESTWOOD CIR 117 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA Z2602.4461 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64 - A- - 21-A 64 - A�- 21-A SALES JERRY A SALES JERRY A SALES THERESA L SALES THERESA L 117 WESTWOOD CIR 117 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64 - A- - 21-A 64 - A- - 21-A SALES JERRY A SALES JERRY A SALES THERESA L SALES THERESA L 117 WESTWOOD CIR 117 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 ttiquettes faciles a peter ® I Repliez A la hachure afin de www.avery.com I Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 516111 Sens de chargement reveler le rebord Pop-up`c 1-800-GO-AVERY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Pax: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING November 18, 2015 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION 111 1-15 FOR FREEDOM MANOR On beliall of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, December 2, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Strect, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #11-15 of Freedom Manor, submitted by Pennoni Associates, to rezone 13.8596 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District and 33.6819 acres from the RP (Residential Performance) to the RP (Residential Performance) with proffers. The properties are located east and adjacent to Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 north/west of tllc existing signalized intersection of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644), in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 64-A-23, 64-A-20, and 64-A-19. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of' the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winclicster, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.fcva.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner CEP/pd 107 North Kent Strect, Suitc 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 I This is to certify that the attached correspondence Nvas mailed to the following on 1ti l8 lS from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 64 - A- - 23- SHEN-VALLEY LAND HOLDINGS LLC C10 FIRST BANK ACCOUNTING DEPT 1835 VALLEY AVE WINCHESTER VA 22601.6303 64 - 3- - A- SHENANDOAH MEMORIAL PARK INC 311 VETERANS HWY STE B LEVITTOWN PA 19056.1422 64 - A- - 24- HALDEMAN PAUL M JR TRUSTEE FIRST BANK TRUSTEE / PO BOX 2751 WINCHESTER VA 22604 63 - A- - 146- BREEDLOVE THOMAS W BREEDLOVE MABEL 3575 PAPERMILL RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.4448 63 - A- - 145- GROVE EUGENE F 332 W PARKINS MILL RD i WINCHESTER VA 22602.4735 63 - A- - 124- EFG INVESTMENTS LLC 340 W PARKINS MILL RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.4735 64 - A- - 18- MADISON II LLC 558 BENNYS BEACH RD FRONT ROYAL VA 22630.6963 64D - A- - 3- PROPERTY MANAGEMENT & DEVELOPMENT LLC 1020 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22692.4410 64D - A- - 7- GARY DARLENE GOOD ETALS i 1048 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4410 64D - A- - 12- MYERS FRANKLIN L SR 1071 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4423 Candice T. Perkins, Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUN F FREDERICK y 1�''"'`�c'' " Notary Public in and for the State and County Cy aforesaid, do hereby ce1- ify that Candice T. Perkins, Senior Planner f or the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated 15 , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. t� Given under my hand this gday of _-101S My commission expires on% �,, 3 1, �U ) I NOTA=REGISTRATION ER IC 354474F VIRGINIAE2017 f 64D - A- - 28- MADIGAN ROXANNE LOUISE 131 WESTWOOD OR 22602 4464 WINCHESTER VA 64D - A- - 27 REID LEWIS E v REID SANDRA L 1154 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602 64D - 8-1. 1A- RED FOX RUN HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC DEBRA M POTTER REG AGENT 907 JASMINE ST 34747.4618 CELEBRATION FL 64 - 2- - D2- ✓ HERNANDEZ JOSE D HERNANDEZ ESTANISLAO 102 ORION CT 22602.7645 WINCHESTER VA 64D - A- - 30- CROSS ANN S TRUSTEE 1170 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER VA 22602.4411 64 - A- - 23-A WILISCH ROBIN CASEY J 21 PEYTON ST WINCHESTER VA 22601.4837 64D - 2- A- 15- DRIVER JOHN L DRIVER CAROL W 112 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 1 This is to certify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 64D - 2- A- 5- 64D - A• - 10• BROOKS PAUL D WHITACRE ASAKO BROOKS WILLENE C 101 HARRIS LN 187 WESTWOOD DR YORKTOWN VA 23692.4829 WINCHESTER VA 22602.4464 • 2• A 11- 64D - 2- A• 4- SW SWAIN RAYMOND JR MIDKIFF BARBARA L ✓ 179 WESTWOOD DR SWAIN KATHRYN B WINCHESTER VA 22602.4464 132 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 9- PRATT ERIC W PRATT ALLISON 125 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 7- SALES JERRY A SALES THERESA L 117 WESTWOOD CIR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 1- B- A- MANUEL WADE R MANUEL CAROL L 207 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 64D - 2- A- 6- ANDERSON JOHNNY H 197 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- A- 3- MAYHEW RAYMOND H i MAYHEW E JEAN 366 SINGHASS RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 64D - 2- - 2- DODD BRENDA S TRUSTEE 155 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.4461 22602.4465 22602.4464 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK 64D -2-A- 1- LARGENT ROBERT M LARGENT PATSY 0 141 WESTWOOD DR WINCHESTER VA 22602.2137 22602.4464 i 22602.4464 Candice T. Perkins, Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. I, , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Candice C. Perkins, Senior Planner for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this clay of My commission expires on NOTARY PUBLIC NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING November 18. 2015 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION 411-15 FOR FREEDOM MANOR On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, December 2, 2015, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application:. wlt S Yt' e Rezoning #11-15 o reedom Manor, submitted by Pennoni�o rezone 13.8596 acrcKfromkk (Rural Areas District t P (Residential Performance) District and 33.6819 acres from RP (Residential Performance) tiP (Residential Performance) with proffers. The property fronts on the east side of Papermill Road (Route 644), approximately 2,300 feet west-northwest of the intersection of Papermill Road (Route 644) and has access to Front Royal Pike (Route 522), in the Shawnee Magisterial District. and is identified by Property Identification Numbers 64-A-23.64-A-20, and 64-A-19. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A cope of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: w,.Nw.fcva.us. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner CEP/pd �(�, W a s DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGTNiA Ccwo L _1 � GIS, MAPPING, GRAPHICS woRK REQUEST DATE RECEIVED: ' III q I I J REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: REQUESTING AGENT: -" �1 Department, Agency, or Company: - Mailing and/or Billing Address: Telephone: FAX. E-mail Address: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (Write additional information on back of request) DIGITAL: PAPER: FAX: E-MAIL: SIZES: COLOR: BLACK/WHITE: NUMBER OF COPIES: STAFF MEMBER: HOURS REQUIRED: COMPLETION DATE: MATERIALS: DATE OF PICK-UP/DELIVERY: AMOUNT DUE: AMOUNT BILLED: METHOD OF PAYMENT: AMOUNT PAID: CHECK NO.# Frederick County GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-5651) iezoal.mil J .J <l lob -A - I Adjoining Property Owners Freedom Manor Name Address Property Identification Number PIN Name: Shenandoah Memorial Park Inc. 311 Veterans Hwy, Suite B Property#: 64-3-A Levittown, PA 19056 Name: Paul M. Haldeman Jr. Trust c/o First Bank Trust Division 1835 Valley Ave / Property #: 64-A-24 Winchester, VA 22601 Name: Thomas Breedlove and Mabel Breedlove 3575 Papermill Rd Property#: 63-A-146 J Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Eugene F. Grove 320 Victory Rd Property #: 63-A-145 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: EFG Investments LLC 340 W Parkins Mill Rd Property #: 63-A-124 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Madison II LLC 558 Benny Beach Rd Property#: 64-A-18 Front Royal, VA 22630 Name: Property Management and Development LLC 1020 Front Royal Pike Property#: 64D-A-3, 64D-A-4, 64D-A-5 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Darlene Good Gary et als 1048 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-7, 64D-A-8 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Franklin L. Myers, Sr. 1071 Front Royal Pike Property#: 64D-A-12, 64D-A-14 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Asako Whitacre 101 Harris Ln Property#: 64D-A-10 Yorktown, VA 23692 Name: r e, 8996 Old Montgomery Rd Property #: 64D-2-A-11, 64D-2-A-12, 64D-2-A-15 Columbia, MD 21045 Name: Eric W. Pratt and Allison Pratt 125 Westwood Circle #: 64D-2-A-9, 64D-2-A-10 Winchester, VA 22602 -Property Name: Jerry A. Sales & Theresa L. Sales 117 Westwood Circle Pro ert #: 64D-2-A-7, 64D-2-A-8, 64-A-21A Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Wade R. Manuel & Carol L. Manuel 207 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-1-B-A Winchester, VA 22602 Johnny H. Anderson 197 Westwood Dr ert #: 64D-2-A-6 Winchester, VA 22602 Lme: me: Paul D. Brooks and Willene C. Brooks 187 Westwood Dr ert #: 64D-2-A-5 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Barbara L. Midkiff 179 Westwood Dr #: 64D-2-A-4 Winchester, VA 22602 -Property Name: Raymond H. Mayhew & Jean E. Mayhew 366 Singhass Rd Property #: 64D-2-A-3 Winchester, VA 22602 'Name: Brenda S. Dodd, Trustee 155 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-2 Winchester, VA 22602 Name Address Propert Identification Number PIN Name: Robert M. Largent & Patsy O. Largent 141 Westwood Dr Pro ert #: 64D-2-A-1 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Roxanne L. Madigan 131 Westwood Dr Pro ert#: 64D-A-28 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Joseph W. Edminston 1295 Hollow Rd Pro ert #: 64D-A-27 Gore, VA 22637 Name: Red Fox Run Homeowners Association Inc. Go Debra Potter 106 Travis Ct Property #: 64D-8-1-1A Winchester, VA 22602 J/Name: Jose D. Hernandez & Estanislao Hernandez 102 Orion Ct Property #: 64-2-D2 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Ann S. Cross, Trustee 1170 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-30 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Robin Casey Wilisch 21 Peyton St Property #: 64-A-23A Winchester, VA 22601 Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: #: -Property Name: Property #: L-LaNc E To: fl*Mwa-Data Processing From: Pam -Planning Dept. Pleas Pri t sets of labels by ri Thanks! (oL4-A-i� Adjoining Property Owners Freedom Manor Name Address Property Identification Number PIN Name: Shenandoah Memorial Park Inc. 311 Veterans Hwy, Suite B Property #: 64-3-A Levittown, PA 19056 Name: Paul M Haldeman Jr Trust c/o First Bank Trust Division 1835 Valley Ave Property #: 64-A-24 Winchester, VA 22601 Name: Thomas Breedlove and Mabel Breedlove 3575 Papermill Rd Property #: 63-A-146 Winchester. VA 22602 Name: Eugene F Grove 320 Victory Rd Property #: 63-A-145 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: EFG Investments LLC 340 W Parkins Mill Rd Property #: 63-A-124 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Madison II LLC 558 Benny Beach Rd i Property#: 64-A-18 Front Royal, VA 22630 I Name: Property Management and Development LLC 1020 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-3, 64D-A-4, 64D-A-5 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Darlene Good Gary et als 1048 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-7, 64D-A-8 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Franklin L. Myers, Sr. 1071 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-12, 64D-A-14 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Asako Whitacre 101 Harris Ln Property#: 64D-A-10 Yorktown, VA 23692 Name: Sw r1 8996 Old Montgomery Rd Property #: 64D-2-A-11, 64D-2-A-12, 64D-2-A-15 Columbia, MD 21045 Name: Eric W. Pratt and Allison Pratt 125 Westwood Circle Property #: 64D-2-A-9, 64D-2-A-10 Winchester, VA 22602 me: Jerry A. Sales & Theresa L. Sales 117 Westwood Circle 64D-2-A-7, 64D-2-A-8, 64-A-21A Winchester, VA 22602 Lert#: L Wade R Manuel & Carol L. Manuel 207 Westwood Dr 64D-1-B-A Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Johnny H. Anderson 197 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-A-6 Winchester, VA 22602 ame: Paul D Brooks and Willene C. Brooks 187 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-A-5 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Barbara L. Midkiff 179 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-2-A-4 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Raymond H. Mayhew & Jean E. Mayhew 366 Singhass Rd #: 64D-2-A-3 Winchester, VA 22602 -Property Name: Brenda S Dodd, Trustee 155 Westwood Dr -Property #: 64D-2-2 Winchester, VA 22602 �PLca-x vMu,y Name Address Property Identification Number PIN Name: Robert M Largent & Patsy O. Largent 141 Westwood Dr Property#: 64D-2-A-1 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Roxanne L. Madigan 131 Westwood Dr Property #: 64D-A-28 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Joseph W Edminston 1295 Hollow Rd Property #: 64D-A-27 Gore, VA 22637 Name: Red Fox Run Homeowners Association Inc c/o Debra Potter 106 Travis Ct Property #: 64D-8-1-1A Winchester, VA 22602 ame: Jose D. Hernandez & Estanislao Hernandez 102 Orion Ct Property #: 64-2-D2 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Ann S. Cross, Trustee i 1170 Front Royal Pike Property #: 64D-A-30 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Robin Casey Wilisch 21 Peyton St 01 Property #: 64-A-23A Winchester, VA 22601 Name: j Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: FIRST BANK, a Virginia Banking Corporation By: (S"-Q--Uj ro>���� t (SEAL) Earl W. Foreman, Vice President COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA EI , to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction by Earl W. Foreman, Vice President of Fh-st Bank, a Virguiia Banking Corporation, this (,,01 day of September, 200S. Notary Public My Commission Expires: A �A 10- _ 1� NOTARY PUBLIC °° _ % -Y OF ttIp'tyawtygA• Page 3 of 5 i (SEAL) Steph4G.utler, Trustee COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF WINCHESTER, to wit; The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction, by Stephen G. Butler; Trustee, this day of September, 2005. Notary public My Commission Expires: s 3) DCv Wage 4 of 5 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA By: (SEAL) Joh' Riley Jr., ounty dministrator COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CITY OF WINCIIESTER, to wit: The foregoing Declaration of Restrictive Covenant was acknowledged before me, a Notary Public in the aforementioned jurisdiction, by John R. Riley Jr., County Administrator for the County of Frederick, Virginia, this Q 7L day of &eptt�ier, 2005. /-, 60,tbf--1, Public My Commission Expires: I'l-J �90211 Page 5 of 5 Nov 6 2015 Document Approval Form i PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL, PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO HA VE COMPLETED. Initials Date & Time Candice Dave Eric Mike John COMMENTS: Lti; Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time) (S:Office on Blackbox\Forms\Document Approval Form — 12/27/13)