Loading...
HRAB 11-21-23 Meeting Agenda1.Administrative Items 1.A.Meeting Minutes - September 19, 2023 2.Review of Inn at Vaucluse Spring Conditional Use Permit 2.A.The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for a campground/tourist camp/recreation area/resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility. The +/- 44.25 acre property (Property Identification Number 84-A-53A) is in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The property is located west of Valley Pike (Route 11) and south off Vaucluse Road (Route 638) in the Back Creek Magisterial District. An existing permit (CUP #02-95) approved in 1995 for a bed and breakfast allows for 15 guest rooms and a restaurant for guests only. 3.Review of Jordan Springs Comprehensive Plan Amendment 3.A.The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application #02-23 for Jordan Springs. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The properties are +/- 176.25 acres (Property Identification Number 44- A-294A) and +/- 55.67 acres (Property Identification Number 44-A-294). The properties are located south of the existing Snowden Bridge development, west of Jordan Springs Road (Route 664), and north of Woods Mill Road (Route 660) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Both properties are currently split zoned RA (Rural Areas) and B2 (General Business) near the existing hotel. The Comprehensive Plan for long range land use classifies these properties as remaining rural except for the small portion of business around the hotel. The application proposes amending the long range land use to High-Density Residential. 4.Review of Brockton Comprehensive Plan Amendment AGENDA HISTORIC RESOURCES ADVISORY BOARD TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2023 6:00 PM FIRST-FLOOR CONFERENCE ROOM FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA HRAB11-21-23MeetingMinutesSeptember19.pdf HRAB11-21-23CUPVaucluseSpring_Redacted.pdf HRAB11-21-23CPPA02-23JordanSprings_Redacted.pdf 1 4.A.The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application #03-23 for the Brockton Property. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The property is +/- 6.39 acres (Property Identification Number 42-A-194) located on the western side of the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522) and Route 37 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. The property is currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Comprehensive Plan for long range land use classifies this property as remaining rural. The application proposes amending the long range land use to Business. 5.Review of Sargent Comprehensive Plan Amendment 5.A.The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application #04-23 for the Sargent Properties. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The properties are +/- 117 acres (Property Identification Number 76-A-42) and +/- 5.00 acres (Property Identification Number 76-A-42A). The properties are located west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522), south of Tasker Road (Route 642), and east of White Oak Road (Route 636) in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Both properties are currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Comprehensive Plan long range land use classifies these properties as Mixed-Use Industrial/Office and Industrial. The application proposes amending the long range land use to High-Density Residential and Industrial. 6.Historic Plaque Program 6.A.Continued discussion on the Historic Plaque Program. 7.Meeting Time Discussion 7.A.Review results of the survey of the availability of members during regular business hours and discuss potential options for alternative meeting times. HRAB11-21-23CPPA03-23BrocktonProperty_Redacted.pdf HRAB11-21-23CPPA04-23SargentProperties_Redacted.pdf HRAB11-21-23HistoricPlaqueProgram.pdf 2 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Administrative Items Title: Meeting Minutes - September 19, 2023 Attachments: HRAB11-21-23MeetingMinutesSeptember19.pdf 3 Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) September 19, 2023 First Floor Conference Room of the County, Administrative Building 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA Members Present: Gary Crawford, Lucas Cook, David Sforza, Robbie Molden, and Jack Owens Members Absent: Dana Newcomb, Steve Cantu, Robert Meadows, William Orndoff, and Nicholas Powers Staff Present: Kayla Peloquin, Maral Kalbian, David Frank (Pennoni), and Marisa Whitacre (Greenway Engineering) Agenda Items: Call to order at 6:00 p.m. Item 1: Minutes The March 21, 2023 minutes were approved unanimously. Item 2: Review of Hopewell Rezoning Application The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a rezoning application of +/- 38.99 acres consisting of multiple parcels (Property Identification Numbers: 33-A-114A, 33-A-122, & 33- A-163) from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District to the B2 (General Business) Zoning District with proffers. The properties are located near Interstate 81 Exit 321, north of Hopewell Road (Route 672) and west of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. David Frank stated that with the current proposal, the Stine House (DHR ID#034-0931), which was build circa 1905, would be demolished. The barn on the property would be disassembled and reassembled in another location. David Frank stated the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan envisions this area to be commercial. There was a discussion on how the General Development Plan (GDP) would reroute traffic from the existing offset Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road intersection. Members discussed the best place for an interpretive sign. Gary Crawford made a motion to recommend approval of the application and recommended the applicant conduct a phase 2 architectural study of the Stine House prior to it being removed as well as proffer an interpretive sign to be placed in Land Bay 3 of the GDP about the Stine House. David Sforza seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Item 3: Review of Winchester Gateway Rezoning Application The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a rezoning application of +/- 34.26 acres of a +/- 71.85 acre parcel (Property Identification Number 63-A-80I) from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District to the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District with proffers. The remainder of the property is zoned M1, approved through REZ #01-15, known as the Blackburn Rezoning. The HRAB comments from that rezoning are attached for information. The property is located near the intersection of Apple Valley Road (Route 652) and Middle Road (Route 628) in the Back Creek Magisterial District. 4 Marisa Whitacre mentioned that previous rezonings and affordable housing initiatives on this parcel have been denied in the past, mainly due to neighbor opposition. There was a discussion of the potential impacts to the viewshed due to the construction of new buildings that could be as tall as 60’ in height to meet the Zoning Ordinance standard for the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District. Robbie Molden recommended approval of the application and recommended the applicants proffer a height restriction for new buildings not to exceed the height of existing structures on adjoining M1 zoned parcels. Lucas Cook seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Item 4: Review of Stephenson Depot Rezoning Application The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a rezoning application of +/- 6.98 acres made up of four (4) parcels (Property Identification Numbers: 44-A-42, 44-A-43, 44-A-47, 44- A-48A) from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District (1.2 acres), the B2 (General Business) Zoning District (2.78 acres with proffers), and the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District (3 acres with proffers) to the B2 Zoning District with proffers. The properties are at the northeastern corner of the intersection of Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) and Old Charles Town Road (Route 761) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Marisa Whitacre introduced the applicants and discussed the future road plans for a roundabout at the intersection of Old Charles Town Road and Martinsburg Pike to be constructed by VDOT. Members discussed the connection with the adjoining parcel to the south of Old Charles Town Road owned by SVBF which will be open to the public. Jack Owens made a motion to recommend approval of the application and recommend the applicants extend the open space shown on the GDP along Old Charles Town Road to preserve the remaining portions of the original road and conduct a Phase 2 architectural study of the Burton Hoover House located at 2452 Martinsburg Pike (DHR ID# 034-0945) to update the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System (VCRIS) records. Lucas Cook seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Item 5: Historic Plaque Program Staff provided an update on the Historic Plaque Program for which eight letters were mailed out to the properties identified at the February 21, 2023 HRAB meeting notifying landowners that they have been selected to receive a plaque. At a Board of Supervisors meeting in April, announcements were made for the five properties that accepted the plaque. Currently, there are two remaining plaques from the 1995 order of 40 plaques. Members suggested mailing two letters out to the owners of Long Green and Hackwood. There was a discussion on if future funding were to be secured to continue the program, a contest for a new plaque design could engage the public and raise awareness of the program. Members directed staff to see if there is any of the original funding that HRAB secured in 1993. There was little optimism regarding funding opportunities available to continue the program, particularly for jurisdictions that are not a Certified Local Government (CLG). The meeting was adjourned at 7:37 p.m. 5 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Review of Inn at Vaucluse Spring Conditional Use Permit Title: The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for a campground/tourist camp/recreation area/resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility. The +/- 44.25 acre property (Property Identification Number 84-A-53A) is in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The property is located west of Valley Pike (Route 11) and south off Vaucluse Road (Route 638) in the Back Creek Magisterial District. An existing permit (CUP #02-95) approved in 1995 for a bed and breakfast allows for 15 guest rooms and a restaurant for guests only. Attachments: HRAB11-21-23CUPVaucluseSpring_Redacted.pdf 6 Item # 2 Inn at Vaucluse Spring Conditional Use Permit Application The Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) application for a campground/tourist camp/recreation area/resort, a public restaurant, and a special event facility. The +/-44.25 acre property (Property Identification Number: 84-A-53A) is in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The property is located west of Valley Pike (Route 11) and south off Vaucluse Road (Route 638) in the Back Creek Magisterial District. An existing permit (CUP#02-95) approved in 1995 for a bed and breakfast allows for 15 guest rooms and a restaurant for guests only. No HRAB records from that application could be found. This CUP would allow for the restaurant to be open to the public and for special events to be held at the Inn. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published in 1992 by the National Park Service does not identify the parcel as within the core area or study area of any of the major Civil War Sites. The mapped sites identified within a half mile radius of the property according to the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System are: •034-0220/034-0138 – Inn at Vaucluse Spring •034-0262 – Mildred Kline House •034-5073 – 263 Vaucluse Road •034-5074 – 265 Vaucluse Road •034-5075 – Woodbine Farm Please find the following attachments for your information: •Location Map •HRAB Application & Attachments •Virginia DHR Surveys, Maps, and Photographs The Applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed CUP. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements possibly impacted by the proposed use. The comments will be included in the CUP application package. **If you have any questions prior to the meeting please forward them to me and I will relay them to the Applicant. 7 # # # # # £¤11 §¨¦81 Downes,Al House Kiln, Rt.11 South Conrad House StickleyHouse House atVaucluse DARTERJO DRVAUCLUSESPRING LNRIENZIKNOLL LN KLINES MILL LNSTROSNIDER LNCOYOTE RIDGE LNHITES RDVALLEYPIKEVAUCLUSE RD KLINES MILL RD Inn at Vaucluse Spring CUP #Historic Rural Landmarks Civil War Battlefields 0.5 Mile B uffer Parcels Map Produced by Frederick C ounty Planning and D evelopment Dept.October 16, 2023 0 0.25 0.50.125 Miles Inn at V aucluse Spring CUP I Cedar C reekBattlefield 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 10 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Descriptive Inn at Vaucluse Spring Function/Location House, 515 Vaucluse Spring Road Historic/Current Vaucluse Property Addresses Alternate - Route 638 Number change - 231 Vaucluse Spring Lane Alternate - 473 Vaucluse Spring Lane Current - 515 Vaucluse Spring Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):22655 Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:100 Site Description: July 2008: The Inn at Vaucluse Spring is located on Vaucluse Spring Lane, which runs southwest from Vaucluse Spring Road. The main house is sited at the end of the lane and faces south. A gravel parking lot is located directly north of the house. The property is shaded by mature trees and the Vaucluse Spring, which includes a pond, is located east of the house. The Inn at Vaucluse Spring includes six guest houses: "The Gallery", the "Chumley Homeplace", the Mill House Studio", the "Cabin by the Pond", the "Manor House," and the "Cottage on the Hill". These buildings are sited along the north side of Vaucluse Spring Lane. The non-historic "Cottage on the Hill" building is located northwest of the main house near the parking lot. The ruins of an outbuilding, evidenced by a stone chimney, is located west of the cottage. A non-historic shed is located north of the mill house. A pool enclosed by a stone wall is directly in front (south) of the gallery building and a non-historic outbuilding is located along the west side of the pool. November 2008: No changes to the setting have occurred since the previous survey. No changes to the secondary resources have occurred. June 2020: This dwelling is located at the end of Vaucluse Springs Road on a large rural property. The building rests on a slight knoll at the center of an open grassy lawn. There is minimal vegetation around the building, although the clearing is bordered by woods to all sides. The road which becomes a private driveway, approaches the house from the rear and terminates a parking area between it and a modern guesthouse. Spread throughout the large associated property are additional guest cottages, a historic mill, and other outbuildings, several of which were moved to the property to allow it to function as a bed and breakfast. Surveyor Assessment: July 2008: According to the PIF submitted in 1996: "The original owners of the property were Lord Fairfax and Yost Hite. Between 1765 and 1778, it was part of a 775-acre tract owned by Lewis Stephens, founder of the present day Stephens City. Between 1778 and 1782, it was owned by Isaac Zane, Revolutionary War patriot and owner of the Marlboro Iron Works. Between 1782 and 1785, the property was owned by Gabriel Jones, the "Vatley Lawyer," one of the first "King's Attorneys" for Frederick County. According to Garland Quarles in his book “Some Old Homes in Frederick County, Virginia”, Jones was "one of the best-known and most influential citizens of the Valley of Virginia during the Colonial period of its history." Jones served in the House of Burgesses for several years and was a friend and political campaigner for George Washington. He served in the Virginia General Assembly, the Continental Congress and the Virginia Constitutional Convention. Jones apparently never had a home at Vauscluse, but is thought to have had a law office there, possibly in the building of which nothing remains today but a stone fireplace chimney. Jones sold the 775 acres to his son Strother in 1785. Strother had been a captain in the revolutionary army. He built his home and named it after a spring in Vaucluse France which was the country retreat of Petrarch, a 14th Century poet of courtly love. Strother lived at Vaucluse until his death In 1790 and was the first person to be buried in the Jones family cemetery at Vaucluse. The earliest description of Vaucluse that we have is the diary of Rev. Frederick Goodwin, who came to Vaucluse in 1827 as a tutor to the Jones children (the grandchildren of Strother Jones). At that time there was no door on the south side of the house. The entrance was on the north side where a portico was "supported by large round pillars, made rough and white thus presenting the appearance like coarse sand stone." Rev. Goodwin's description of the house, other than the main entrance being on the north rather than the south, seems clearly to fit Vaucluse as it stands today. Descendants of Gabriel and Strother lived at Vaucluse until shortly after the Civil War. The story of the Civil War in the Northern Shenandoah Valley is recounted in the words of the Jones family and their relatives, the 33 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 10 Bartons, in “Defend the Valley” by Margaretta Barton Colt. Vaucluse was occupied from time to time during the war by Union troops and ultimately all of the livelitock and crops were destroyed. “Gabriel Jones (1724-1806) and Some of His Descendants”, by Brown, Chappel and Myers contains a facsimile of a sales brochure for Vaucluse thought to date to the 1870's. At that time the "outbuildings for servants, &c., are also built or brick, and are ample in character." These included two tenant houses equal to ordinary farmhouses, stables, blacksmith's and carpenter's shops, a very large and comparatively new barn, and a grist mill "of capacity sufficient for the farm and neighborhood." From 1898 until 1963, the property was owned by the Rice Family of Winchester, first by John Rice and later by his son Warren. In 1963, the survivors of Warren Rice sold the property to John and Betty Chumley. The Chumleys added the building on the site of the former mill as well as all of the buildings listed above that are not associated with the Vaucluse manor house. Mr. Chum1ey passed away in 1984 and his widow sold 128 acres of the 234 acre parcel to the current owners in 1995. Since October 1995, the Chumley-era buildings have been used as a country inn/bed & breakfast.” In 2008, the entire site, including the large brick manor house, operates as a bed and breakfast. In 1996, VDHR recommended Vaucluse as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion C, architecture. Although the manor house underwent a major renovation circa 1997, the house still retains its architectural integrity. All improvements made to the house appear to be in keeping with the character of the original house and follow the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation. Since the Chumley-era buildings were extensively remodeled and are not original to the site, the surveyor recommends that these buildings are included non-contributing resources. November 2008: This property historically served as the site of a mill. However, it currently functions as a bed and breakfast. Since the property has lost the integrity of its original function, and since no evidence could be located that supports historic significance, this resource is recommended ineligible for listing under Criterion A. Although the artist John Chumley resided on this property and used it as a studio, it is not the most significant resource associated with his life. As such, the Inn at Vaucluse Spring is not recommended eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion B. The VDHR concluded that this resource is eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C in 1996. The buildings associated with this property have not lost integrity, and continue to convey their architectural significance. In addition, although some of the buildings on the property have been moved from their original locations, under Criteria Consideration B, as long as these buildings are significant solely for their architectural value, they can still be considered eligible for listing on the NRHP. As such, The Inn at Vaucluse Spring is still recommended eligible for listing under Criterion C. The proposed NRHP boundary should encompass the contributing buildings and their immediate surroundings to approximately the extent of the existing tax parcel. June 2020: This property is an excellent example of a late-eighteenth/early-nineteenth century rural manor house in the region. The home is believed to have been built by Strother Jones, who had been a captain in the revolutionary army. He named it after a spring in Vaucluse, France, which was the country retreat of Petrarch, a 14th century poet of courtly love. Also on the property throughout the nineteenth century was a grist mill and a variety of other tenant houses and dependencies. In the 1960s, the owners relocated a number of other nineteenth century buildings to the property to allow it to function as a bed and breakfast. In 1995, many of the buildings, including the main Vaucluse house, were renovated, generally in keeping with their historic character. As such, the home and many of the buildings were determined eligible for listing in the NRHP by the VDHR in 1996. The eligibility was confirmed in 2009, and at this time, the complex continues to represent a good collection of representative architecture from the early-nineteenth century in the region. As such, it continues to be considered eligible for listing in the NRHP for distinctive architecture. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Potentially Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1810 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Federal/Adamesque Form:No Data Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Remodeled Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: 34 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 10 Architecture Summary: Vaucluse is a two-story, three-bay building on a raised stone basement. It is constructed of brick; Flemish bond on the front a a 5-course American bond on the sides and back. It has 2 large interior brick chimneys. There are flat arches over all of the openings. The building has louvered shutters, most of which have been used to board it up. The first floor windows are full length and have jib doors which are paneled. The roof is hipped with a strong overhang. The eaves now have exposed rafters but appear to have originally been concealed. There are vent windows with original wooden bars in the raised basement. To the rear of the house there is a 1-and-a-1/2-story brick wing. This appears to have originally been the summer kitchen. It also appears that there was originally an open breezeway between the main house and the kitchen which has been closed up with brick. July 2008: This house underwent a major rehabilitation circa 1995. The house rises two stories above a uncoursed fieldstone foundation. It is constructed of Flemish-bond brick on the south façade and five-course America-bond brick on the remaining elevations. The house is capped with a hipped roof of standing-seam metal with overhanging eaves. It has two interior brick chimneys with corbelled caps. Windows are twelve- over-twelve double-hung wood-sash with wood-paneled spandrels on first story of the side elevations (replacing what was jib doors) and twelve- over-twelve triple-hung wood-sash windows on the first story of the symmetrically-fenestrated three-bay façade. The second story has twelve- over-eight double-hung wood-sash windows. The centered single-leaf door on the façade features an eight-light transom. All window and door openings have jack-arched brick lintels. A five-bay, one-story porch has been added to the house since the last survey and has an uncoursed fieldstone foundation and wood posts and a simple wood balustrade. A one-and-half-story brick wing is located west of the house and is attached to the main block along its northeast corner. A one-story wood-frame entrance vestibule and porch is attached to the south elevation of the addition and the east elevation of the main block. November 2008: No changes to this dwelling have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood Other Porch 1-story, 5-bay Wood Post, Square Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Coursed Roof Hipped Metal Standing Seam Structural System and Exterior Treatment Masonry Brick Other Chimneys Interior Brick Corbeled Windows Sash, Triple-Hung Wood Other Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Workshop Date of Construction:1960Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Three additional buildings are now on the property: 1) a two-story walnut log structure with additions; 2) a one-and-a- half story Dutch Colonial reproduction house; 3) and a building on the old mill site. July 2008: This building was most likely moved or built on the site circa 1963 by Chumley, who used the building as his first studio. The building appears to incorporate a one-and-a-half-story house and a one-story barn. The barn is connected to the west elevation of the house. Both buildings are clad in weatherboard and have side gable, wood-shingle roofs. The house has a steeply-pitched roof with overhanging, spayed eaves that incorporated a full-width front porch. An exterior-end brick chimney is located on the east elevation. The house has six-over-six wood- sash windows and gabled dormers that hold four-over-four wood-sash windows. The south elevation of the house has an off-set single-leaf door. The barn has a triangular hay hood on its west elevation. The south elevation features a multi-light bay window. November 2008: No changes to The Gallery have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 35 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 10 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Number of Stories:1.5 Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Archaeology Site Resource Type:Archaeological Site NR Resource Type:Site Historic District Status:No Data Not Observed:This resource was not observed during the last survey. Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:Deterioration Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: To the west of the house are the ruins of an outbuilding. All that remains is a large stone chimney with an interior fireplace. This appears to date earlier than the main house. July 2008: The stone chimney is still standing west of the guest house that was constructed circa 2007. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: This site was not investigated as part of this effort. Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:Industry/Processing/Extraction Resource Type:Mill House Date of Construction:1800Ca Date Source:Site Visit/Owner Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: East of the main house, there was originally a mill. July 2008: The “Mill House Studio” is sited on Vaucluse Spring. According to current owners, the building was rebuilt on the foundation of the historic Vaucluse Mill house and used as Chumley’s second art studio. The building has a raised, uncoursed stone foundation. The two-story building is clad in weatherboard and has a gable roof of standing seam metal with and ogee cornice and cornice returns. An interior brick chimney with a corbelled cap rises above the roof. Windows are six-over-six double-hung wood-sash. November 2008: No changes to the Mill House Studio have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Number of Stories:2 36 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 5 of 10 Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Secondary Dwelling Date of Construction:1820Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The Chumley Homeplace was built circa 1820 and was also moved to its current site in 1963 by John Chumley. It is a two- story building that has been clad in weatherboard siding and topped with a side gable roof. Wood shingles comprise the roofing material, and a stone chimney marks the gable end. The fenestration consists of 6/6 double-hung wood sash windows. A one-story screened-in porch with a shed roof has been attached to the east elevation. Multiple one-story additions have been appended to the house on the north, south, and east elevations. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Also recorded separately as 034-0220 Number of Stories:2 Secondary Resource #5 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Secondary Dwelling Date of Construction:2007Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Post Cold War (1992 - Present) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: July 2008: Built circa 2007, the “Cottage on the Hill” is a one-story wood-frame building set on a solid foundation clad in an uncoursed rubble stone veneer. The building is clad in weatherboard and is capped with a side gable standing-seam metal roof with a louvered ridge ventilator. A one-story bay projects from the south elevation. Windows are six-over-six wood-sash. The façade has two single-leaf doors. November 2008: No changes to the Cottage on the Hill have occurred since the previous survey. Due to its construction date and lack of historical significance, the Cottage on the Hill is a non-contributing building. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #6 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1850Ca Date Source:Site Visit/Owner 37 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 6 of 10 Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Three additional buildings are now on the property: 1) a two-story walnut log structure with additions; 2) a one-and-a- half story Dutch Colonial reproduction house; 3) and a building on the old mill site. July 2008: Constructed circa 1850, the one story “Cabin by the Pond” was a former tobacco barn, according to the current owners and was moved to the site. It sits on an uncoursed stone foundation and is constructed of hewn logs. It has a side gable, standing-seam metal roof. A one- story wood-frame bay projects from the west elevation and is clad in weatherboard. Windows are six-over-six wood-sash. A one-story shed porch fronts the building and shelters a single leaf door. The porch has wood posts. November 2008: No changes to the Cabin by the Pond have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible changes since previous survey. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #7 Resource Category:Social/Recreational Resource Type:Pool/Swimming Pool Date of Construction:1990Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No discernible style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: July 2008: This inground pool sits south of the studio. Novemer 2008: No changes to the pool have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. Secondary Resource #8 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1990Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known 38 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 7 of 10 Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Two modern storage sheds. July 2008: Only one shed was visible at the time of survey. This shed is located north of the mill. It is a one-story, wood-frame building with a concrete-block foundation. The walls are covered in what appears to be composition siding. It has a gambrel, asphalt shingle roof. A shed overhang is located on its east elevation. November 2008: No changes this shed since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #9 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1990Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Colonial Revival Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Two modern storage sheds. Architectural description: Reproduction of a Williamsburg smokehouse. July 2008: This one-story wood-frame shed is located adjacent to the pool, along its west side. It sits on a rubble stone foundation and its exterior walls are clad in what appears to be composition siding. It has a pyramidal roof of wood shingles. November 2008: No changes to the shed have occurred since the previous survey. ---------------------- June 2009 June 2020: This resource could not be seen at the time of this survey. Number of Stories:1 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0138 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:12/18/2020 39 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 8 of 10 Staff Comment DHR Project No. 2020-0416 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2020-0416 Investigator:Robert Taylor Organization/Company:Dutton + Associates, LLC Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:6/9/2020 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Field survey and reporting prepared by D+A Architectural History staff. Project Bibliographic Information: D+A. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Foxglove Solar Project in Frederick County, Virginia. October 2020. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:6/18/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR records show property recommended eligible under Criterion C in 1996, which appears to be still valid based on data provided for this project; current Phase II data would be needed to confirm and determine whether other NRHP criteria apply, due to the passage of time. The viewshed analysis data indicates no potential for visual effect - no futher work. No additional determination of eligibility made by DHR staff at this time. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/16/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: DHR records show property recommended eligible under Criterion C in 1996, which appears to be still valid based on data provided for this project; current Phase II data would be needed to confirm and determine whether other NRHP criteria apply, due to the passage of time. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 40 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 9 of 10 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/28/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Surveyors: Patti Kuhn Mike Yengling Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0138 Staff Name:DHR Event Date:3/19/1996 Staff Comment Vaucluse, Frederick County, VDHR Number 34-138. The resource was rated at the local level for significance in the area of architecture. It was found eligible with a score of 38. Event Type: PIF Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Keeping Company, LLC Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:2/1/1996 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, Maral Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/1/1989 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data 41 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0138 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: 034-0220 October 17, 2023 Page: 10 of 10 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Quinn, Michael C. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/16/1973 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Kuhn, Patti Record Type: DHR File Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: DHR Board: Eligible DHR ID:034-0138 Staff Name:State Review Board Event Date:6/1/1966 Staff Comment No Data Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 42 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/17/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.43 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 5 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Current Mildred Kline House Property Addresses Current - 236 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):STEPHENS CITY Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Not Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:No Data Site Description: August 2008: This dwelling stands on a level grassy lot on the north side of Route 638. A weeping willow tree is located in the side yard north of the house. November 2008: No changes to the setting have occurred since the previous survey. ----------------------------- Secondary resources are outbuildings. August 2008: A gravel driveway leads past the house to a one-bay garage and a gable front shed. The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: In addition to the garage and shed, another wood framed shed is located northwest of the main dwelling, but has begun to deteriorate. Surveyor Assessment: July 2008: It is the opinion of the surveyor that this two-story wood frame dwelling, built ca. 1840, is not eligible for inclusion in the National Register. The house does not possess characteristics of demonstrable significance with respect to design, construction or use of materials (Criterion C). It does not appear to be associated with significant broad patterns, events or persons (Criteria A and B). It has not yielded, nor is it likely to yield, information important to history or prehistory (Criterion D). November 2008: This resource does not possess any significant historical associations with events, trends, themes, or individuals in local or regional history. As such, it is recommended ineligible for NRHP listing under Criteria A or B. The main house stands as a heavily altered example of a common architectural form found throughout the region. Additionally, the outbuildings are unexceptional and deteriorated examples of regularly found types. Therefore, this resource is recommended ineligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C. Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1840 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) 44 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 5 Historic Context(s):Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: August 2008: This two-story side gable house with a standing seam metal roof features an interior brick chimney, an extremely large exterior brick chimney at the north end, vinyl siding, and and 4/4 and 6/6 vinyl windows. The house has a three-bay front porch with a half-hipped roof, and a two-story three-sided addition at the south end. November 2008: No changes to the house have occurred since the previous survey. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double-Hung Vinyl 4/4 Windows Sash, Double-Hung Vinyl 6/6 Roof Gable, Side Metal Standing Seam Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Coursed Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Siding, Vinyl Chimneys Exterior End Brick Cap, Corbeled Chimneys Interior Brick Cap, Corbeled Porch 1-story, 3-bay Wood Post, Chamfered Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Garage Date of Construction:1955Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: timber-frame, horizontal siding, gable roof, shed-roof addition August 2008: The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: The wood framed garage is located north of the hosue and has a concrete block foundation, aluminum siding, a gable roof with V-crimp metal, and an open shed roof addition. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:DSS Legacy 45 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 5 Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1955Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: The shed is timber frame, has vertical-board siding, and is very dilapidated. August 2008: The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: The shed is clad in aluminum siding and is topped with a standing seam metal gable roof. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1910Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Deteriorated Threats to Resource:Deterioration Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: timber frame, shed roof, vertical-board siding August 2008: The secondary resources appear to have not been altered since they were last surveyed; however, access to and the visibility of the secondary resources was limited since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. November 2008: This building is located northwest of the main dwelling. It is obscured by vegetation, but appears to be in a state of deterioration. Number of Stories:2 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events 46 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 5 Event Type: DHR Staff: Not Eligible DHR ID:034-0262 Staff Name:Kirchen, Roger Event Date:3/16/2009 Staff Comment TrAIL Power Engineers GAI Consultants, Inc. 385 E. Waterfront Dr. Homestead, PA 15120 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 ----------------------------- Record Type: DHR File Data Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:The Louis Berger Group, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/3/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Surveyors: Mike Yengling Patti Kuhn Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 ----------------------------- Record Type: DHR File Data Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, Maral Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/1/1989 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: No Data 47 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0262 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 5 of 5 Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 ----------------------------- Record Type: DHR File Data Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 48 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/17/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.49 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5073 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 4 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Function/Location House, 263 Vaucluse Road Property Addresses Alternate - Route 638 Current - 263 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status Not Evaluated Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:No Data Site Description: August 2008: This house is located on the south side of Vaucluse Road. The house is located on a grassy level lot and surrounded by mature trees. November 2008: This resource is located on the south side of the road and faces west. Mature trees and shrubs obscure the property from the right-of-way. ----------------------------- August 2008: In addition to the primary dwelling there are a garage and a shed. At the request of the owner, neither of these two resources was recorded at the time of the field visit. November 2008: Property access was not granted at the time of survey. Therefore, the survey was conducted from the public right-of- way only. Two wood framed outbuildings are associated with the house but were partially obscured from view. Surveyor Assessment: July 2008: It is the opinion of the surveyor that this two-story wood frame dwelling, built ca. 1900, is not eligible for inclusion in the National Register. The house does not possess characteristics of demonstrable significance with respect to design, construction or use of materials (Criterion C). It does not appear to be associated with significant broad patterns, events or persons (Criteria A and B). It has not yielded, nor is it likely to yield, information important to history (Criterion D). November 2008: The house at 263 Vaucluse Road does not exhibit any connections with significant events or themes in Frederick County history. Therefore, it is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion A. No information can be identified that connects this resource to an individual significant in history. As such, the house at 263 Vaucluse Road is not recommended eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion B. This unexceptional example of frame vernacular residential architecture has been compromised by a number of alterations that have resulted in a loss of architectural integrity. As such, this resource is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C. Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1900 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) 50 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5073 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 4 Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Remodeled Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: August 2008: The two-story, three-bay wood-frame house has a side-gable roof clad in standing-seam metal, a central brick chimney, 6/6 wood windows, a full-width front porch, and vinyl siding. In good condition at time of survey. November 2008: The resource located at 263 Vaucluse Road is a two-story, side gable, frame vernacular dwelling. Vinyl siding has been applied to the exterior walls and standing seam metal comprises the roofing material. An interior brick chimney pierces the roof at the ridgeline. 6/6 double-hung wood sash windows are located throughout the house. A one-story, half-hipped roof porch stretches across the facade. It is supported by square posts and a balustrade. A shed roof addition is appended to the rear of the dwelling. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 6/6 Foundation Solid/Continuous Unknown Not Visible Roof Gable, Side Metal Standing Seam Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Siding, Vinyl Chimneys Interior Brick Bond, Common Porch 1-story Wood Post, Square Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1900Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: There are two wood framed outbuildings located adjacent to the house. However, since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way and the buildings were partially hidden by vegetation, a detailed description could not be obtained. Both outbuildings appear to be wood framed, covered with aluminum siding, and topped with gable roofs clad with asphalt shingles. Number of Stories:1 Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Garage Date of Construction:1900Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) 51 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5073 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 4 Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Domestic Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: There are two wood framed outbuildings located adjacent to the house. However, since the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way and the buildings were partially hidden by vegetation, a detailed description could not be obtained. Both outbuildings appear to be wood framed, covered with aluminum siding, and topped with gable roofs clad with asphalt shingles. Number of Stories:1 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:6/18/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: GAI recommended that this resource is not NRHP eligible but DHR has asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey with full access to the property. Viewshed analysis data indicated no potential for visual effect - no further work. Due to this conclusion, DHR did make an eligibility determination at this time. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/16/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: GAI recommended that this resource is not NRHP eligible but DHR has asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey with full access to the property. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report 52 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5073 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 4 Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:The Louis Berger Group Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/3/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Surveyors: Mike Yengling, Patti Kuhn Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 53 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/17/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.54 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5074 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 3 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Function/Location House, 265 Vaucluse Road Property Addresses Current - 265 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Not Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:No Data Site Description: November 2008: This house is located on the south side of the road on a level grassy lot. ----------------------------- November 2008: Access to this property was not granted and, as such, the survey was conducted from the public right-of-way. There are no secondary resources associated with this house. Surveyor Assessment: November 2008: No evidence that conclusively ties this resource to any significant events in local history could be identified. As such, this resource is recommended ineligible for listing under Criterion A. This property is not associated with any significant individuals in local or state history and is therefore recommended not NRHP-eligible under Criterion B. This house located along Vaucluse Road has been extensively modified with the application of asbestos shingle siding, new asphalt shingle roofing material, and the construction of two new porches. As such, it no longer maintains architectural integrity and is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion C. Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1930 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning, Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Number of Stories:1.5 Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: 55 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5074 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 3 No Data Architectural Description: August 2008: The 1 ½-story, side-gable, wood-frame house, built circa 1930, features weatherboard siding, 2/2 wood windows on the primary façade, a brick end chimney, a newly rebuilt front porch, and a rear porch with a shed roof. Roofing material was not visible. The house is in fair condition at this time. November 2008: Constructed circa 1930, this 1.5 story frame vernacular house stands on a continuous masonry foundation. The exterior walls are clad in both weatherboard and asbestos shingle siding. This house features a side gable roof covered with asphalt shingles and 2/2 double- hung wood sash windows. Decorative shutters flank some of the windows. A one-story, full-width porch has recently been constructed on the facade and is built on a wood pier foundation. Square wood posts and balustrade support the shed roof. A similar shed roof porch has also been appended to the rear. A shouldered brick chimney stack marks the west gable end. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable, Side Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 2/2 Porch 1-story, full-width Wood Posts Foundation Solid/Continuous Unknown Not Visible Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Shingles, Asbestos Chimneys Exterior End Brick Bond, Common Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Wood Weatherboard Secondary Resource Information Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Not Eligible DHR ID:034-5074 Staff Name:Kirchen, Roger Event Date:3/16/2009 Staff Comment GAI recommends that this resource is not NRHP eligible and DHR concurs with this recommendation. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian 56 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5074 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 3 Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 57 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/17/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.58 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 1 of 10 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Function/Location Farm, 829 Vaucluse Road Historic Woodbine Farm Current Woodbine Barn Property Addresses Current - 829 Vaucluse Road County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):84 A 50 USGS Quad(s):MIDDLETOWN Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:197 Site Description: November 2008: The Woodbine Farm is situated on the south side of the road and faces north. The house sits close to the road, while a long gravel driveway leads to the barn, shed, and vehicle/equipment shed which are located farther out in an open field. May 2009: A site visit with full property access confirmed that no changes to the secondary resources have occurred since the November 2008 survey. June 2020: This dwelling is located on the south side of Vaucluse Road on a large rural property. The building sits near the road in an overgrown cluster of trees and other vegetation that screens its visibility from the road. A gravel driveway extends past the side of the house to an agricultural complex to the rear. Just across the driveway from the house is a small deteriorated barn. Set on a ridge to the rear of the house are a historic bank barn and a more recent pole barn. Set between the home and barns is orchard on one side of the driveway and open pasture on the other. February 2022: This property is located on the south side of Vaucluse Road and contains 197 acres of rural landscape. The home is set along the road at the front of the property in the center of a grassy, overgrown yard. The driveway extends past the east side of the home and extends towards the agricultural complex set centrally in the property. Just across the driveway from the home is a small outbuilding. A patch of woods borders the homesite along Vaucluse Road to the west. Behind the wooded area, and extending nearly to the western edge of the property and far back as the agricultural complex is a cultivated orchard. On the opposite side of the driveway stretching to the east edge of the property is a fenced cattle pasture. A small, gravel pull off is located roughly four hundred feet to the east of the house. The pull off is likely used for maintenance of the powerline that intersects the property at the northeast corner. Roughly 650 feet to the rear of the house along the driveway is an agricultural complex that consists of a large early-twentieth century bank barn, a mid-twentieth century vehicle shed, a well house, and remains of a former silo. From the complex, the farm lane takes a dogleg turn and then extends through an additional agricultural field and orchard to Hites Road along the west edge of the property. To the rear of the complex is a treeline that separates additional cattle pastures occupying the rear of the property. Surveyor Assessment: November 2008: The main dwelling and agricultural outbuildings do not possess associations with significant events or themes. As a result, Woodbine Farm is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion A. No evidence linking this property to any significant individuals in local history could be identified. As such, this resource is recommended not eligible for NRHP listing under Criterion B. The buildings that comprise Woodbine Farm do not have sufficient architectural significance or integrity to warrant NRHP listing. The house has undergone various alterations including application of new siding material, construction of a modern porch, and multiple additions. Therefore, this resource is recommended not eligible under Criterion C. May 2009: After full access to the property was granted, an additional site visit was conducted. However, this site visit did not reveal additional information that would qualify the resource for NRHP listing. As such, there are no changes to GAI's November 2008 recommendation of not NRHP-eligible under Criteria A, B, or C. June 2020: This property is an example of a typical late-nineteenth century rural dwelling and farm in the region. The home reflects an I-house form with little architectural distinction. It includes a small collection of typical rural barns and outbuildings, including a contemporary bank barn. Although the home remains a poor condition, overall, the property retains moderate historical integrity and was therefore deemed potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP by the VDHR in 2009. At this time, the home and outbuildings appear to retain similar integrity as at that time and as such, D+A recommends it continue to be considered potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP. February 2022: This dwelling is an example of a typical Vernacular farmhouse in the region built in the early-twentieth century. The home was originally constructed in 1906 by Emily and Alexander Jones, descendants of the prominent Jones family of Frederick 59 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 2 of 10 County. The property was once part of the larger Vaucluse estate, constructed by William Strother Jones, Sr., circa 1785. The earliest known owner of the property on which the house now stands was Gabriel Jones (1724-1806), who settled in Frederick County during the mid-seventeenth century. The son of Welsh immigrants, Gabriel lived in Williamsburg during the early years of his life. In 1727, the Jones family moved to England due to financial difficulties. While there, Gabriel attended school and served as an indentured apprentice for a lawyer, after which time he began practicing law himself. In 1745, Jones returned to Virginia and eventually settled in Frederick County. In 1751, he purchased a 244-acre tract of land in Frederick and constructed a dwelling there, known as Bogota. During the mid-eighteenth century, he served numerous terms in the House of Burgesses. In his later life, Gabriel Jones worked as a lawyer. By the time of Gabriel Jones’ death in 1806, he owned a total of 1,200 acres of land, which included the present farm. In 1785, he gave a 775-acre tract of land, purchased from Isaac Zane in 1778, to his only son, William Strother Jones, Sr. (1756-1790). During the American Revolution, William served as a captain in the Continental Army. After the war, he served as a colonel in the Virginia Militia. Soon after acquiring land from his father in 1785, William built a house there, known as Vaucluse. The house, which still stands today, is a two-story, Federal-style, brick mansion. It is located roughly one mile southeast of the present house and is currently operated as a bed and breakfast. When William Strother Jones, Sr. died in 1790, he left Vaucluse to his wife. His will stipulated that in the event that their son, William S. Jones, Jr., married, the ownership of the house would pass to him. William Jr.’s mother would remain in the house with him for the remainder of her life. In 1806, William S. Jones, Jr. was married to Anna Marshall, the niece of Chief Justice John Marshall. At this time, he moved into the Vaucluse house. The house appears on an 1809 map of Frederick County. Together, William and Anna had four children. Then in 1823, Anna died at the age of thirty-five. Two years later in 1825, William married Ann Cary Randolph. The couple also had four children. When William Jones, Jr. died in 1845, he willed the Vaucluse estate to his two sons, William S. Jones, III and Francis Jones. In 1849, Francis Jones conveyed his interest in the property to his brother, William. William lived in the house with his stepmother, Ann Cary, his wife, Mary, and their three children, William, Ann, and Beverly, through the Civil War. During the war, Francis Jones served as a member of Confederate General Stonewall Jackson’s staff. In 1862, he was mortally wounded at the Battle of Gaines Mill in Hanover, Virginia. During the war, numerous parties of Union soldiers in the area visited Vaucluse. During these visits, the soldiers stole items from the house and took crops and livestock from the fields. After the war, William Jones, III fell on hard times, as did many farmers in the South following the collapse of the Southern economy and the loss of enslaved labor. Ann Cary Randolph Jones complained of the loss of enslaved workers on the farm, noting that “the abolitionist measures [make] this a large place to cultivate and may compel a change” (quoted in Brown et al.). Unable to maintain the estate and farm, William sold the Vaucluse estate to Guy Richards in 1865 in order to settle a debt of $16,000. The sale included the house and surrounding 430 acres. Guy Richards owned Vaucluse until 1874, at which time the property was sold to John Miller in order to settle Richards’ own debts. During his ownership, Richards had increased by size of the property by 40 acres, bringing its total size to 470 acres. After taking ownership in 1874, John Miller lived at Vaucluse for seven years. He operated a grist mill on the property during that time. By 1881, the property came into joint ownership between John Miller J.M. Long. Then in 1884, Miller and Long agreed to divide and consolidate their ownership of the Vaucluse property so that Miller retained consolidated ownership of the 2/3 share of the property including the “mansion tract” while Long retained ownership of the 1/3 share of property that included 197 acres in the northwest corner. This coincides with the property now identified as 897 Vaucluse Road. Long retained ownership of this property until 1896. While the circumstances of the transaction are unknown, Long’s farm fell to the Shenandoah Valley National Bank in 1896. The Shenandoah Valley National Bank later sold the property to Alexander Tidball Jones and Emily Whittier Jones in 1902. Alexander was the grandson of William S. Jones, Jr. of Vaucluse. His father, Beverly Randolph Jones, was born at Vaucluse. While the Jones family no longer retained ownership of Vaucluse itself, Alexander and Emily Jones had secured a portion of the original farmland. Together, Alexander and Emily owned the property for five years, during which time Alexander likely cultivated the land and built the present house. The Jones couple, along with their daughter, Frances McNeece Whittle Jones, resided in Winchester throughout their ownership of the property and therefore the home was likely rented to a tenant farmer, however, according to the 1910 Census, Alexander himself was identified as a farmer. According to land tax records, the house was valued at $235.50 when it was built in 1906, demonstrating its modest scale as compared to larger estates in the area such as Vaucluse. While not separately noted, it is likely that the large bank barn was built at the same time as the house. The following year, the Jones couple sold the house and 197-acre farm to local farmer, Edgar Stickley. It is likely that the Jones family never lived in the house, but instead constructed it in order to encourage a buyer to purchase the property or to serve as a tenant house. Upon taking ownership of the farm in 1907, Edgar Stickley likely cultivated the farmland surrounding the new house. It is unclear whether he resided in the house during his ownership, as he owned additional land in Frederick County. During the same year that he had purchased the Jones’ farm, Edgar owned three additional tracts of land, two of which included dwellings and other outbuildings. According to the 1900 and 1910 Census, Edgar lived in Frederick County with his wife, Susan, and son, Claude. In 1917, Edgar conveyed the house and farm to his twenty-seven-year-old son, Claude. Claude was known to have lived in the house throughout his ownership of the property. According to the 1920 Census, Claude was designated as head of the household. His parents, who were in their sixties, lived with him. At the time, he worked as a farm manager. Then in 1921, Claude married Pearl Haldeman. By 1930, Edgar and Susan Stickley were living in a separate home. Claude operated his property as a working farm, while Pearl worked as a teacher. The couple lived on the farm until 1933. During their ownership, local records suggest additional outbuildings were constructed, possibly including the shed near the main house and the silo next to the bank barn that no longer remains. Claude and Pearl Stickley sold the farm to Harman Brumback in 1933. Harman was the son of Isaac Brumback, a prominent doctor, landowner, and Confederate veteran in Frederick County. His father owned numerous farms and operated a number of successful fruit orchards in the area. Referenced in the deed of sale were the house, barn, and other outbuildings present on the property at the time. During his ownership of the farm, Harman Brumback lived in the house with his wife, Frances (known as “Fannie”), and their four children, Henry, Franklin, James, and Margaret. According to public records, Harman took on his father’s business of operating multiple farms and running fruit orchards. In 1952, Harman and Fannie gave ownership of the farm to their four children. The couple then moved to Winchester. Together, the 60 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 3 of 10 Brumback children retained joint ownership of the property. Then in 1965, Henry Brumback founded Woodbine Farms Inc., an apple orchard and commercial farming business that still operates in Frederick and Shenandoah Counties today. His father, Harman, served as president of the company for many years until his death in 1980. When the company was first established in 1965, all four of the Brumback siblings sold their interest in the property to the company. Throughout the late-twentieth and early-twenty-first centuries, Woodbine Farms cultivated the fields surrounding the house. Woodbine Farms, Inc. is still operated by the Brumback family today. At this time, the property continues to be used agriculturally including an orchard, cattle operation, and cultivation of other crops. The home is no longer occupied, although the bank barn and vehicle shed remain in use. Historically, the property was associated with the prominent Jones family of Frederick County and was part of the grand Vaucluse estate throughout the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, although the present-buildings and configuration are not reflective of that period. The property was separated and developed following a division and consolidation of the Vaucluse property in the late-nineteenth century. By the first years of the twentieth century, this property came back into possession of Alex Jones, a descendant of the original Jones family of Vaucluse. While it does not appear that this Jones resided on the property, he farmed it and was responsible for the construction of the home and bank barn. While the home is not particularly architecturally distinct, the bank barn has been regarded as a good example of timber frame bank barn construction in the region. At this time, the barn remains in use and continues to retain a relatively high degree of historical integrity. As such, it has been determined potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP by the VDHR as part of several compliance projects and continues to be treated as such. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:1906 Date Source:Local Records Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:L-Plan Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:Deteriorated Threats to Resource:Neglect, Vacant Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The main house of Woodbine Farm was constructed circa 1880. This frame vernacular dwelling with two-story rear ell stands on a continuous stone foundation and is covered with aluminum siding. The house is topped with a side gable roof that is clad in standing seam metal. 2/2 double-hung wood sash windows comprise the fenestration, and the first floor windows on the facade feature decorative shutters. A modern shed roof porch has been attached to the facade. The porch is built on a pier foundation and features turned wood posts and a wood balustrade. A one-story, shed roof addition has been appended to the east elevation upon which another one-story, gable roofed addition was attached. May 2009: The main dwelling has not undergone any changes since the previous survey. June 2020: This single dwelling was built circa 1880 according to previous study and exhibits a Vernacular design. The two-story building has an I-house front block with an offset two-story rear wing. The wood frame structural system is clad with vinyl siding and rests on a continuous stone foundation. It is topped by a side-gable roof covered with standing seam metal that is pierced by an exterior end chimney at the ridge. The main entrance is set centrally on the front and is sheltered by a full-width one-story porch. All fenestration on the building has been covered with plywood. The building is plain and unornamented. February 2022: This single-family dwelling was built in 1906 according to local land records. The building exhibits a Vernacular form with no discernable style or applied embellishment. It was originally built as a two-story, three-bay residential structure with an offset two-story rear ell. A one-story mass was later to the rear in the corner between the front block and ell and a later one-story addition was subsequently to the rear of that addition, although this rearward-most addition has recently been demolished and all that remains is the concrete slab foundation. The building is currently vacant and remains in poor condition. As such, interior inspection was not permitted. The original core of building is two stories in height and has an I-house form with an offset rear ell. The front block is three bays wide and one bay deep. Along the rear elevation of the front block is a two-story, rear ell, which is situated at the southwest corner of the front block. The rear ell is two bays wide and two bays deep. The front façade of the house is symmetrical, with a central door flanked by two windows on the first 61 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 4 of 10 story and three windows on the second story. A nearly full-width one-story porch extends along the front. The porch appears to be nonhistoric, although it could not be determined if it replaced an older porch or portico. The structural system of the house is wood frame, covered with vinyl siding, although it is unclear whether original siding remains beneath the vinyl. The building rests atop a continuous stacked field stone foundation. It is topped by a side-gabled roof with a low pitch and no overhangs that is covered with standing-seam metal. The rear ell is topped by a gable roof that ties into the rear slope just below the ridge over the front block. An exterior-end, concrete block chimney extends up the west side of the front block at the ridge. Fenestration is limited to the front façade, the rear of the main block, and inside wall of the rear ell. There is no fenestration on the sides of the front block, the outside wall of the rear ell, or the rear of the rear ell. All doors and windows on the home are currently boarded over with plywood, although recently conducted previous survey provides details on these features. The primary entrance is set centrally on the front and consists of a paneled wood door, with four lights in the upper half of the door. An aluminum storm door has been inserted into the entrance. The windows on the front façade appear to be original. On each side of the door, a two-over-two, double-hung sash window is evenly spaced between the corner of the wall and the doorframe. Three windows of the same design are found on the second story, directly above the first story openings. The windows on the first story are adorned by faux vinyl shutters, although one shutter has fallen off. A secondary entrance is located on the side of the one-story rear addition adjacent to a hexagonal bay window. The front porch is one-story and stretches nearly the full-width of the front facade. The porch has a wood deck floor supported by plain posts that are wrapped in lattice panels. A set of plain wood stairs lead onto the porch in front of the main entrance. The porch is covered by a shed roof supported by four turned wood posts. A simple wood railing and balustrade extends between the posts. The one-story rear addition remains in deteriorated condition, although its basic form and fenestration remains evident. The mass is topped by a shed roof that slopes down from the side of the original rear ell. The roof has an extended overhang that shelters the secondary entrance and bay window on the outside wall. The second rear addition was previously appended to the rear wall of this mass, however, it no longer remains standing. It was frame with a gable roof. Previous documentation reveals the walls were blank with no doors and windows, and the interior was accessible only from an interior doorway from the adjacent one-story addition. Overall, the building is simple in design and ornamentation. It is void of applied embellishment and does not reflect any discernable stylistic influence. It has been wrapped in nonhistoric materials and additions. Further, it has been vacant for an extended period of time and now remains in a poor condition. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Frame Vinyl Siding Roof Gable, Side Metal Standing Seam Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 2/2 Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Rubble, Random Porch 1-story, 3-bay Wood Posts, Turned Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Shed,Vehicle/Equipment Date of Construction:1940 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The vehicle/equipment shed stands one-story tall with metal siding and a gable roof. An open shed roof bay has been attached to the north elevation. May 2009: A site visit with property access confirmed that the one-story vehicle-equipment shed is clad with 3 V-crimp metal siding, and the side gable roof is covered with standing seam metal. A total of eight eight open bays are located on the facade, including the shed roofed addition on the northeast elevation. June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. ---------------------- June 2020 62 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 5 of 10 February 2022: Set further to the south of the bank barn, and on the opposite side of the farm lane is a mid-twentieth century one-story, frame vehicle shed. The building consists of a main block that is four bays wide and one bay deep and a side addition along the north elevation that is four bays wide and one bay deep. The main block of the shed has a side-gable roof, while the addition has a flat roof. The exterior walls are clad in metal siding on the west and south elevations, while the north and east elevations are open. Each bay is divided by a wooden post. A total of eight bays are located on the front elevation of the shed. Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Metal Siding Foundation Post-in-ground No Data No Data Roof Side Gable Metal No Data Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1906 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Reconstruction and Growth (1866 - 1916) Historic Context(s):Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: The heavy timber frame barn features a fore bay on the east elevation. It is clad in vertical wood siding and has a gable roof covered with V-crimp metal. May 2009: A site visit with property access revealed that this barn is constructed on a continuous stone foundation. Board and batten siding has been applied to the exterior walls, and the side gable roof is clad in standing seam metal. An earth bank leads to large sliding wood doors on the northwest elevation. June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. February 2022: Set on a knoll roughly 650-feet to the rear of the house is a large bank barn believed to have been built circa 1906 along with the home. The building has a timber frame structural system that rests on a stone foundation. The timbers are roughly 10-inch square and circular mill sawn. Many of the joints are pegged mortise and tenon. The stone foundation is stepped so as to extend the full-height of the lower-level along the earth embedded elevation, but step down along the sides to where the rear of the lower-level is framed. The building is oriented such that the earthen ramp to the upper-level faces west while the lower level opens to the east. The heavy timber frame of the upper-level is clad in vertical wood board siding. The structure is topped by a side-gable roof covered with standing-seam metal. On the west elevation a large just off-center bay provides access to the interior of the upper level from the earthen ramp. The bay is enclosed by a set of sliding vertical wood plank doors suspended from a metal track. At the northernmost end of the west elevation is an open bay that leads into a dogtrot through the lower level. The north end of the building has two small window openings that illuminate storage rooms off the dogtrot passage and a small window set near the peak of the gable. A similar gable window and two large openings with horizontal slats pierce the lower-level of the south end. The east (rear) elevation of the building has a wide bay on the upper-level set directly across from the bay on the front and features similar sliding doors. The upper-level is cantilevered over a recessed area that stretches the width of the lower level. A series of wood posts provides additional support along the sill of the cantilevered area. This shelters a row of animal stalls that open into the lower level. The stalls have wood doors with solid panels in the lower half and horizontal slats in the upper half. The dogtrot from the front elevation extends through and also opens out the sheltered lower-level area on the rear. A fenced corral extends from the rear of the building. The interior of the barn is divided primarily into livestock area on the lower-level and storage above. The lower level space is divided by posts and railings that create a series of stalls and feeding areas, all with dirt floors. It is accessible by a flight of interior stairs from the upper-level as well as a small hatch from the dogtrot. Several storage rooms line the outside (north end) wall of the dogtrot. The interior of the upper-level contains a large open area that occupies much of the space with small enclosed workrooms in the southwest and southeast corners. The timber structural frame divides the space into a series of bays which are open to the roof, although several integral ladders suggest there may have been secondary floors or lofts in the past. The interior stairwell to the lower level is located adjacent to the central bay. Number of Stories:2 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Wood Vertical Board Foundation Solid/Continuous Stone Coursed 63 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 6 of 10 Roof Side Gable Metal No Data Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1930 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Domestic, Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Neglect Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: November 2008: Adjacent to the dwelling stands a wood framed shed. This shed is clad in vertical wood siding and topped with a standing seam metal gable front roof. The window apertures remain open. May 2009: After property access was granted, a site visit confirmed that the one-story wood framed shed is clad in both vertical wood and board and batten siding. The standing seam metal clad gable front roof is trimmed with exposed rafter tails. 1/1 double-hung vinyl sash windows comprise the fenestration. June 2020: No visible change since previous survey. ---------------------- June 2020 February 2022: Set across the driveway just to the southeast of the house is a one-story, frame shed. The building has a rectangular form with a post in-ground foundation. It consists of a three-bay, main block with a one-bay ell along the west elevation. The exterior walls are clad in wood weatherboards on the north elevation, except for the portion of the wall above the roof eaves, which is clad in vertical wood boards. The remainder of the building is clad in vertical wood boards. The front-gable roof is covered with standing-seam metal; most of the roofing has fallen off, revealing the framework underneath. A central doorway leads into the shed along the north elevation, although no door fixture remains in place. A broken, one-over-one, double-hung sash window flanks the door to the right. A small window opening is located along the west elevation of the side ell, although there is no window fixture in the opening. The building is vacant and in poor condition. Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Wood Vertical Board Foundation Post-in-ground No Data No Data Roof Front Gable Metal No Data Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Silo Date of Construction:1930 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Subsistence/Agriculture Architectural Style:No discernible style Form:No Data Condition:Demolished Threats to Resource:Demolition Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: February 2022: Set near the south end of the bank barn is a poured concrete ring that was the foundation of a former silo. 64 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 7 of 10 Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:2020-0416 Investigator:Robert Taylor Organization/Company:Dutton + Associates, LLC Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:2/10/2022 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: This intensive-level documentation was prepared in partial fulfillment of the approved mitigation plan for the Foxglove Solar project. As part of the project, this property will be partially developed with solar arrays and therefore result in an adverse impact to the property. Research, survey, and reporting were conducted by D+A architectural history staff. Project Bibliographic Information: D+A. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Foxglove Solar Project, Frederick County, Virginia. October 2020 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID:034-5075 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:12/18/2020 Staff Comment DHR Project No. 2020-0416 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2020-0416 Investigator:Robert Taylor Organization/Company:Dutton + Associates, LLC Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:6/9/2020 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Field survey and reporting prepared by D+A Architectural History staff. Project Bibliographic Information: D+A. Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of the Foxglove Solar Project in Frederick County, Virginia. October 2020. Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible 65 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 8 of 10 DHR ID:034-5075 Staff Name:Kirchen, Roger Event Date:6/18/2009 Staff Comment GAI recommended that this resource is not NRHP eligible but DHR has asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey with full access to the property. GAI's request for property access was approved. The resource appears potentially NRHP/VLR eligible under Criteria A and C and the barn should be considered the primary resource. Event Type: Survey:Phase II/Intensive Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:GAI Consultants, Inc. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:5/13/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: Please note that GAI's eligibility recommendation was made in the context of this specific transmission line project only. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Kirchen, Roger Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:3/16/2009 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: GAI recommended that this resource is not NRHP eligible but DHR has asked GAI to conduct a complete Phase I survey with full access to the property. Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2006-1202 Investigator:Otten, Megan L. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/9/2008 66 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 9 of 10 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-114 Project Staff/Notes: TrAIL Power Engineers GAI Consultants, Inc. 385 E. Waterfront Dr. Homestead, PA 15120 Project Bibliographic Information: Name: GAI Consultants DHR CRM Report Number: FK-114 Record Type: Report Bibliographic Notes: Phase I Cultural Resources Survey VA State Line - Meadowbrook Substation and Meadowbrook Substation - Appalachian Trail Segments of the Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line (TrAIL) Project, Frederick and Warren Counties, Virginia.2008 Period Of Significance:1906 Level Of Significance:Local Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Phase II Intensive Survey Integrity Recommendations: Association, Design, Feeling, Location, Materials, Setting, Workmanship Bibliographic Information Bibliography: Alexandria Gazette. “Died.” August 11, 1845, 3. Accessed February 2022. Chronicling America: Historic American Newpsapers. Library of Congress. ______. “Died.” April 6, 1846, 3. Accessed February 2022. Chronicling America: Historic American Newpsapers. Library of Congress. American Historical Society. History of Virginia, Vol VI. 1924. “Anna Maria Marshall Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Ann Cary Randolph Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. Barr, C. Frederick. Alexander Tidball Jones with daughter Frances. Photograph. 1902-1903. Accessed April 2022. Stewart Bell Jr. Archives, Handley Regional Library, Winchester, VA. Brown, Stuart E., Eileen M. Chappel, and Lorraine F. Myers. Gabriel Jones and Some of His Descendants: Notes on Bogota and on Vaucluse. Berryville, VA: Virginia Book, Co., 1990. “Capt. William Strother Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Claude Benjamin Stickley.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. Fetzer. George W. “Bogota.” June 22, 1936. Works Progress Administration. Manuscript on file at the Library of Virginia. “Florinda Taylor Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Gabriel Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Gabriel Jones and Bogota.” Massanutten Musings (blog). October 1, 2014. Massanutten Regional Library. Accessed April 2022. http://mrlreference.blogspot.com/2014/10/gabriel-jones-and-bogota.html. “Harman M. Brumback.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Maj. Francis Buckner Jones.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “The Manor House.” Photograph. Retrieved from The Inn at Vaucluse Spring (website). Accessed April 2022. https://vauclusespring.com/accommodation-type/the-manor-house/. McCabe, Tom. “Many Variables Affecting Crop.” Winchester Evening Star. October 15, 1976. Accessed April 2022. Newspaper Archive (database). “Our Story.” Woodbine Farm Market (website). Accessed April 2022. https://www.woodbinefarmmarket.com/about. Powell, Mickey. “Massive solar power plant targeted for Stephens City area.” The Winchester Star. June 5, 2020. Accessed April 2022. https://www.winchesterstar.com/winchester_star/massive-solar-power-plant-targeted-for-stephens-city-area/article_2eb9d69f-2452-514c-bb7a- 6c62cfb316ae.html. Quarles, Garland R. Some Old Homes in Frederick County, Virginia. Winchester, VA: Winchester-Frederick County Historical Society, 1990. United States Census Bureau. Federal Census, 1850-1940. Accessed March 2022. Family Search (website). Varle, Charles, and Benjamin Jones. Map of Frederick, Berkeley, & Jefferson counties in the state of Virginia. Philadelphia: n.p., 1809. Accessed March 2022. https://www.loc.gov/item/2008621756/. 67 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5075 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 17, 2023 Page: 10 of 10 Virginia. Frederick County. Land Tax Books, 1904-1926. Accessed April 2022. Library of Virginia. Virginia Herald (Fredericksburg, VA). “Died at Vaucluse.” September 28, 1831. Accessed February 2022. Chronicling America: Historic American Newpsapers. Library of Congress. “William Strother Jones, Jr.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “William Strother Jones, III.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. “Woodbine Cemetery, Harrisonburg.” Find a Grave (website). Accessed February 2022. Woodbine Farm Market. Photograph of Brumback Family. N.d. Accessed April 2022. https://www.woodbinefarmmarket.com/about. Property Notes: No Data 68 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/17/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.69 Property Photographs from VCRIS & Pictometry DHR #034-0220/034-0138 – Inn at Vaucluse Spring 2020 (VCRIS) – Mill House 70 2020 (VCRIS) – Log Cabin 2008 (VCRIS) – The Manor House 71 2008 (VCRIS) – The Gallery 2008 (VCRIS) – The Cottage on the Hill 72 2008 (VCRIS) – The Chumley Homeplace DHR #034-0262 – Mildred Kline House 2008 (VCRIS) 73 DHR #034-5073 – 263 Vaucluse Road 2023 (Pictometry) DHR #034-5074 – 265 Vaucluse Road - Address point not found on Pictometry DHR #034-5075 – Woodbine Farm 2022 Woodbine Farm Bank Barn (VCRIS) 74 2022 Woodbine Farm Bank Barn (VCRIS) 2022 Front Façade (VCRIS) 75 2022 Rear Addition (VCRIS) 2022 Silo Foundation (VCRIS) 76 77 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Review of Jordan Springs Comprehensive Plan Amendment Title: The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application #02-23 for Jordan Springs. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The properties are +/- 176.25 acres (Property Identification Number 44-A-294A) and +/- 55.67 acres (Property Identification Number 44-A-294). The properties are located south of the existing Snowden Bridge development, west of Jordan Springs Road (Route 664), and north of Woods Mill Road (Route 660) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Both properties are currently split zoned RA (Rural Areas) and B2 (General Business) near the existing hotel. The Comprehensive Plan for long range land use classifies these properties as remaining rural except for the small portion of business around the hotel. The application proposes amending the long range land use to High-Density Residential. Attachments: HRAB11-21-23CPPA02-23JordanSprings_Redacted.pdf 78 Item # 3 Jordan Springs Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application #02-23 for Jordan Springs. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The properties are +/-176.25 acres (Property Identification Number: 44-A-294A) and +/- 55.67 acres (PIN: 44-A-294). The properties are located south of the existing Snowden Bridge development, west of Jordan Springs Road (Route 664), and north of Woods Mill Road (Route 660) in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Both properties are currently split zoned RA (Rural Areas) and B2 (General Business) near the existing hotel. The Comprehensive Plan long range land use classifies these properties as remaining rural except for the small portion of business around the hotel. The application proposes amending the long range land use to high-density residential. Should the Board of Supervisors approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the subject properties would still need to be rezoned, at which time the HRAB would have an opportunity to comment on more specific details. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published in 1992 by the National Park Service identifies the properties as within the study area of the Second Winchester Battlefield. The mapped sites identified on the properties according to the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System (VCRIS) are below. Note: only sites located on the subject properties are included in this agenda packet as the Comprehensive Plan Amendments are general in nature. If a rezoning were applied for, at that time the standard half-mile buffer radius would be applied. • 034-0110 – Jordan White Sulfur Springs • 034-5023 – Second Winchester Battlefield • 034-5035 – Milburn Rural Historic District Please find the following attachments for your information: • Location Map • Application & Attachments • Virginia DHR Surveys, Maps, and Photographs The Applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements possibly impacted by the proposed use. The comments will be included in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application package. **If you have any questions prior to the meeting please forward them to me and I will relay them to the Applicant. 79 # # # SulpherSpring Spa ByersHouse GRISTM ILLCTSANTAFE CTHALOCTSEESAWCTALAM OPLCROFTON CTBAILYWAY CENTIFOURDRCORONATIONCTVAL I SEWAYFADINGSTAR CTBLACKFORDDRMA N IL A P L T HOR NYCR OWN L NH U MMI N G BIR D L NSTARRYWAY DRLINDYWAY B A RRISTER ST ROOFTOP CT FARMHOUSECT PARKL ANDDRRIVERDALECIR NORTHUMBERLAND DR PATCHWORKDR PATRIOT ST INTERLACEWAYSNOWDENBRIDGEBLVD CUNNINGHAMLN SETTLERS LN HIDDENPINES DRHI G H VIE W R D JEWELBOX DR NORLANDKNOLL DR MORRISONS RDWOODS MILL DR HIGH BANKS RD SABER LNCHRISTM AS TREE LN LICK RUN XING J ORDAN S PRI NGS RDMONASTERY RIDGE RD WOODS MILL RDJordan Springs #Historic Rural Landmarks Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels Future Rt 37 Bypass Map Produced by Frederick C ounty Planning and D evelopment Dept.October 24, 2023 0 0.2 0.40.1 Miles J o r d a n S p r i n g s I 80 4 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Initiation Request Form Project Name: ______________________________________________________________________________________________ The undersigned, being all of the owner(s), contract purchasers, or the respective duly authorized agent thereof, do hereby petition to change the Comprehensive Plan as shown on the accompanying plans, maps, and graphics which are made part of this application, as follows: PIN From: To: Acres Total Acreage: Location - the property is located at (give street address(es) if assigned or otherwise exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers): ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Provide the following information for all applicable parties, provide additional pages if necessary: Owner of Property Authorized Agent(s) Name:__________________________________________________ Mailing Address:_____________________________________ City/State/Zip:_______________________________________ Phone:_________________________________________________ Email:__________________________________________________ Name:__________________________________________________ Mailing Address:_____________________________________ City/State/Zip:_______________________________________ Phone:_________________________________________________ Email:__________________________________________________ Contract Purchaser/Lessee Engineer Name:__________________________________________________ Mailing Address:_____________________________________ City/State/Zip:_______________________________________ Phone:_________________________________________________ Email:__________________________________________________ Name:__________________________________________________ Mailing Address:_____________________________________ City/State/Zip:_______________________________________ Phone:_________________________________________________ Email:__________________________________________________ *Check the box next to the contact to which correspondence should be sent. 81 82 6 Proposed Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment Request Provide the following information: Completed and signed CPPA Initiation Request Form (Pages 3-4). Plat of proposed CPPA area including metes and bounds. Justification of proposed CPPA: Describe why the change to the Comprehensive Plan is being proposed and include relevant Comprehensive Plan analysis. Existing Characteristics Analysis. Describe, using text and maps as necessary, the existing zoning, Comprehensive Plan designations, and/or approved uses and densities along with other characteristics of properties that are within: o 1/4 mile from the parcel(s) perimeter if the parcel is less than 20 acres in size o ½ mile if 21 - 100 acres in size o 1 mile if more than 100 acres in size Trip Generation Analysis that includes a comparison of anticipated maximum trips from the current use to the proposed use. Special Power of Attorney Affidavit for each owner (if applicable). One hard copy of the application package. Digital copy containing all plans, maps, text, and/or graphics in PDF format. Non-Refundable Application Review Fee of $3,000 (payable to the Frederick County Treasurer). Existing Comprehensive Plan land use classification(s): ___________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Proposed Comprehensive Plan land use classification(s) and respective areas: ________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Existing zoning and land use of the subject parcel(s):______________________________________________________ What use/zoning will be requested if the amendment is approved? ______________________________________ 83 Jordan Springs – Statement of Justification CPPA June 1, 2023 Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment ONLY The applicant seeks to amend the Comprehensive Plan Map to extend the boundary of the SWSA and UDA to comprehend the approximately 231 acre Jordan Springs property and identify the portions of the Jordan Springs property currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) as intended for future residential development. Currently, the SWSA includes the historic Jordan Springs hotel building surrounded by a ten (10) acre Historic Overlay designation that was previous obtained voluntarily by the applicant. However, the hotel building is outside of the UDA and all of the remaining Jordan Springs property is outside of the UDA and SWSA. This existing hotel building and surrounding Historic Overlay portion of the applicant’s property, as well as the parcel across Old Charlestown Road from the hotel building (next to the pump station property the applicant exchanged with Frederick Water in order to obtain connections to the sewer and water system that currently crosses the properties) is currently zoned B2, with proffered use exclusions that pertain to the hotel building. The remainder of the applicant’s property is currently zoned RA. The property is adjacent to the existing Snowden Bridge planned use development and other historic, small- lot subdivisions. The current application is prompted by the recent interest in the property by Christopher Land, L.L.C., a residential development company seeking to develop the Jordan Springs property as an all-inclusive, age restricted, active adult community with associated assisted living, independent living, and nursing facilities. As illustrated by the concept plan submitted with this application, the intention is to preserve and maintain the existing historic hotel building as the focus of the community and its amenities. The amenities are intended to foster and maintain access to the unique natural resources located on the property that include the historic hotel building and grounds, the beautiful “Devil’s Backbone” overlook area, and the Redbud Run watershed. The planned amenities would include extensive trail networks allowing access to these resources as well as a nine-hole “pitch and putt” golf course, swimming pool and ball courts to encourage outdoor recreation in the natural surroundings. Ultimately, if the County were to amend the UDA and SWSA boundaries as requested, the applicant would seek to rezone the RA portions of the property to the R5 Residential Recreational Community designation with the commercial parcels being used for assisted living and nursing facilities, restaurants and other community-oriented services. The proposed uses for the property squarely fit within the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan. Under the current Comprehensive Plan and both versions of the NELUP update that are under current consideration by the Board of Supervisors, the applicant’s property has no particular future land use designations that restrict the current request. Indeed, the Comprehensive Plan states that “[t]he boundary of Frederick County’s UDA should be examined regularly to ensure that it is absolutely sized to accommodate future growth and offer a diversity of housing types” (Comp. Plan at 3). As the County is aware, there is currently a high demand for residential housing in Frederick County and a very limited inventory of buildable lots and choice of housing unit types. By including the Jordan Springs property into the UDA and SWSA, the County will be able to serve this demand and effect the goals stated in the Comprehensive Plan. 84 Numerous goals stated in the Comprehensive Plan would be met by amending the UDA and SWSA boundaries to include the entire Jordan Springs property. The stated development goals and objectives in the Comprehensive Plan that would be fulfilled by approving the instant application include: 1. Allowing for a mix and integration of a variety of uses and housing opportunities (Comp. Plan at 4); 2. Allowing for increased density, walkability and connectivity (especially if the trail networks are allowed to be connected with the existing and planned networks in the Snowden Bridge and Stephenson Village developments) (Comp. Plan at 4); 3. Allowing for high quality architecture with community focal points (Comp. Plan at 4); 4. Helping preserve environmental quality (Comp. Plan at 4); 5. Focusing development around walkable centers to afford people the opportunity to work, live, shop, and play in locations that are near each other (Comp. Plan at 4); 6. Incorporating Neighborhood Design principles to improve the sense of community and promote close knit, walkable communities where residents have greater opportunities to live, work, and play in the same area(Comp. Plan at 5); 7. Developing internal transportation systems that de-emphasizes the automobile, allowing residents to walk or bike to destinations (Comp. Plan at 5); 8. Promoting the location of community facilities as focal points (Comp. Plan at 6); 9. Ensuring the Bicycle Plan included as part of the Comprehensive Plan provides for trail facilities (Comp. Plan at 6); 10. Encouraging new developments to provide interconnected trail networks (Comp. Plan at 6); 11. Allowing the natural landscape to be used as the background of development with a greater emphasis placed on conservation design for growth, including new recreational opportunities (Comp. Plan at 12); 12. Allowing the clustering of residential development to further preserve agricultural land (Comp. Plan at 13); 13. Preserving the desired physical characteristics of the rural areas (Comp. Plan at 13); 14. Allowing natural systems and open spaces to be incorporated into new residential development, designed to preserve the natural and environmental features of the property in close proximity to dwellings with an emphasis on the provision of useable open space for resident use and enjoyment (Comp. Plan at 19); 85 15. Limiting impacts on public facilities due to age-restricted nature of intended final use for the property and by directing uses within the UDA (Comp. Plan at 57); 16. Allowing residents to be within walking distance of a recreation area (Comp. Plan at 65); 17. Creating green infrastructure with specifically designed open spaces as amenities to off-set higher densities (Comp. Plan at 93); 18. Preserving wooded areas (Comp. Plan at 93); 19. Establishing a “greenway” along Redbud Run utilizing, in part, the existing Frederick Water utility easements, to link people to the area’s natural, recreational and cultural resources, as well as providing a system of natural linkages for wildlife areas to preserve biodiversity and protect habitats and preserving and protecting buffers along Redbud Run which can help protect biodiversity and help filter pollutants (Comp. Plan at 93-94); 20. Providing recreational opportunities such as hiking or bicycling and nature studies such as plant and animal behavior, as well as simply raising awareness of the environment (Comp. Plan at 94 ); 21. Promoting the economic and cultural importance of historic resources (Comp. Plan at 100); 22. Protecting historical resources1 (Comp. Plan at 100); and 23. Increasing the rehabilitation, adaptive reuse, or restoration of historic structures to maintain character of community (Comp. Plan at 101). Given the current need in the County for additional housing units of various types and the policies stated in the Comprehensive Plan encouraging a particular type of environmentally sensitive residential development, the applicant submits that the instant map amendment application to extend the boundaries of the UDA and SWSA to the immediately adjacent Jordan Springs property (part of which is already included in the SWSA) is not only justified by objectives stated in the Comprehensive Plan, it brings them to fruition by allowing continued smart growth in the County. Allowing the amendment will help preserve important historic and natural resources while also serving the housing demands of the community in conformity with the stated objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 1 The applicant submits that, unless she is able to monetize the property through development, it will become too costly to maintain the historic building and access to the natural amenities available on the property and the buildings and property risk falling into disrepair. 86 WOODS M ILL ROAD - ROUTE 6 6 0 JORDAN SPRINGS ROAD - ROUTE 664MONASTERY RIDGE ROAD Frederrick County, VAJORDAN SPRINGSPLAT OF CPPA AREAScale: 1"=200'May 30, 20230100'200'400'800'1 OF 187 88 89 1 MILE TO PROJECT WOO D S M I L L R D R T E 6 6 0 JORDAN SPRINGS RDRTE 664MONASTERYRIDGER D DEVILS BACKBONEOVERLOOKOPE Q U O N WOODSCIRR T E 7 2 9 M O R R I S O N S R DOLD CHARLESTOWN RDRTE 761SNOWDENBRIDGE BLVDI-81SITEFREDERICKCOUNTYCLARKECOUNTYFrederick County, VAEXISTING ZONING MAPScale: 1"=1000'May 30, 20230500'1000'2000'4000'LEGENDRA (RURAL AREA DISTRICT)RP (RESIDENTIAL PERFORMANCE DISTRICT)R4 (RESIDENTAIL PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT)M1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT)B2 (GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT)1 OF 4JORDAN SPRINGS - EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS90 1 MILE TO PROJECT WOO D S M I L L R D R T E 6 6 0 JORDAN SPRINGS RDRTE 664MONASTERYRIDGER D DEVILS BACKBONEOVERLOOKOPE Q U O N WOODSCIRR T E 7 2 9 M O R R I S O N S R DOLD CHARLESTOWN RDRTE 761SNOWDENBRIDGE BLVDI-81SITEFREDERICKCOUNTYCLARKECOUNTY SENSITIVE NATURAL AREAPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTPARKFrederick County, VACOMPREHENSIVE PLAN - LONG RANGE LAND USEScale: 1"=1000'May 30, 20230500'1000'2000'4000'LEGENDRURAL AREABUSINESSJORDAN SPRINGS - EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS2 OF 491 W O O D S M I L L R D R T E 6 6 0 JORDAN SPRINGS RDRTE 664MONASTERYDEVILS BACKBONEOVERLOOKOPE Q U O N W O O D S C I R C L E R T E 7 2 9 M O R R I S O N S R D RIDGE ROADEX. SAN. SEWEREX. PUMP STATIONFrederick County, VAURBAN DEVELOPMENT AREA AND FREDERICK SEWER AND WATER SERVICE AREAScale: 1"=400'May 30, 20230500'1000'2000'4000'JORDAN SPRINGS - EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSIS3 OF 492 WOO D S M I L L R D SITER T E 6 6 0 JORDAN SPRINGS RDRTE 664MONASTERYRIDGER D DEVILS BACKBONEOVERLOOKOPE Q U O N WOODSCIRR T E 7 2 9 M O R R I S O N S R DOLD CHARLESTOWN RDRTE 761SNOWDENBRIDGE BLVD 1 MILE TO PROJECT I-81Frederick County, VAJORDAN SPRINGS - EXISTING CHARACTERISTICS ANALYSISAERIALScale: 1"=200'May 30, 20230100'200'400'800'4 OF 493 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 1 of 8 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Current Name Jordan White Sulfur Springs Historic Shalom et Benidictus, Sulfur Springs Spa Historic/Current Jordan White Sulfur Springs Property Addresses Current - 1160 Jordan Springs Road Route 664 County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):22656 Magisterial District(s):Stonewall Tax Parcel(s):44 A 294 & 44 A 294A USGS Quad(s):WINCHESTER Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:237 Site Description: May 2021: The Jordan White Sulfur Springs property is situated on the west side of the road at 1160 Jordan Springs Road. This former resort is located in an area which has historically been rural but is an increasingly suburban area northeast of Winchester. The 237-acre Jordan White Sulfur Springs property contains six buildings: the hotel, a cabin, an office, a pergola set over the spring, a workshop, and a shed. Surveyor Assessment: 1989: Originally built as a spa/motel for the near by sulfur springs... abandoned in the early 20th C. and bought by the Franklin Insitute who sold it to the Catholic Church who used it for Mission Servants of the Holy Trintiy Monastery until 1972... they then sold it to Shalom et Benidictus, a private non-profit, non-denominational residential treatment community for teenagers with emotional of Family-related problems. 2009 website: 1549 The Sulphur Springs were carefully guarded by the Catawba Indians, who held ceremonial gatherings annually. 1735 Property was originally in the Littler grant to John Littler and Thomas Rees for 1735 acres - the Yorkshireman's Branch farm, afterward Red Bud. 1762 Jeremiah Wood purchased the property from the Proprietor's Office of Northern Neck (Thomas Lord Fairfax) - 377 acres. 1763 - 1832 The property changed five owners. 1832 Branch Jordan purchased the property. 1843 The first stone structure was built as a hotel - the original White Sulphur Resort, by the owner Branch Jordan, with the bathhouse, and several cottages. 1855 - 1861 The second wooden building was built and operated it as a second larger hotel which ran across the front of the property along Jordan Springs Road. 1861 Branch Jordan died. His nephew, Edwin C. Jordan inherited the property at the outbreak of the Civil War. 1861 - 1865 Hotel operations stopped during the Civil War while both hotels were used as hospitals for both sides, depending on which side held Winchester. 1869 Jordan Springs reached a peak of brilliancy never before equaled in antebellum days. It was during this streak of prosperity that Jordan Springs saw President Roosevelt, many of the famous statesmen and soldiers who sought its comfort as well as its healthy 94 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 2 of 8 environment. 1890 Edwin C. Jordan died and his son, Clarendon, inherited the Springs. 1894 Clarendon Jordan built the third hotel, but Jordan Springs began to decline as a resort. 1905 Clarendon Jordan sold the property to his brother-in-law, Col. Henry H. Baker, who had married Clarendon's sister, Miss Belle Eubank Jordan. Col. Baker did not operate the Springs but leased it until the old resort finally closed. 1916 The resort ceased functioning. 1916-1942 Several owners tried in vain to reopen it after 1916. 1942 W.H.M. Stover of Washington purchased the property, and in 1949 made repairs on it. 1949-1950 The hotel began to regain some popularity even though operated on a limited basis. Many people in the Valley patronized its camping grounds, picnic facilities, baseball diamonds, and swimming pool. 1951 The Franklin Foundation of Philadelphia chose Jordan Springs as the site for its school to train imported Iron Curtain students to fight against Communism in their respective countries. The Franklin Foundation leased the property from Mr. Stover, but after 18 months of operation, they closed the school because they could get no student from behind the Iron Curtain. 1954 Missionary Servants of the Most Holy Trinity purchased the property on which they operated a Monastery and Seminary. 1972 The property was leased to Shalom et Benedictus for a drug and alcohol rehabilitation center for young people. 1999 Rehabilitation Center closed. 2001 to Present Greig D. W. Aitken and Tonie M. Wallace Aitken purchased the property from the Missionary Servants of the Most Holy Trinity. Since then, Historic Jordan Springs has served as the corporate headquarters of County Court Reporters, Inc., Court Reporting Consultants, and Advanced LEGAL Technologies, LLC and Historic Jordan Springs, LLC. The 48,000 square foot main facility is used as a technology and training centre, complete with video conferencing, full service event and culture centre. May 2021: Throughout its long life the Jordan White Sulfur Springs has had many uses. Throughout its long life the Jordan White Sulfur Springs has had many uses. The original property owner who developed it into a retreat appears to have been Rezin Duvall, who promoted it for its medicinal qualities in the early 1800s. Several cabins were built and the dam was enlarged drawing invalids from across the region (Cartmell 1909:297). In 1832, Branch Jordan purchased the property and built a limestone hotel named the White Sulfur Resort adjacent to the undergound springs on the property. Jordan further capitalized on the waters by building a bathhouse and several cabins creating an early spa. Over time, additional buildings were added to the property including a larger, ca. 1855 wood frame hotel fronting on Jordan Springs Road, which was later destroyed by fire ca. 1920. With the death of Branch Jordan, his nephew, Edwin C. Jordan, inherited the property at the start of the Civil War. Hotel operations ceased during the war, and both hotel buildings were used as hospitals for both the Confederate and Union armies, depending on who controlled Winchester. Soldiers who died at Sulpher Springs were buried on the grounds until reinterred at Stonewall Cemetery in Winchester in 1866 (VDHR, VCRIS 034- 0110; Historic Jordan Springs 2021; Allen 2001; Cartmell 1909:297). After the war, the hotel and spa reopened serving numerous veterans and statesmen. During the late nineteenth century, the Jordan White Sulfur Springs Hotel and Spa gained increasing popularity as a resort and tourism destination. Many people would travel by train from Washington, Baltimore, New York, and Philadelphia to the property to enjoy the relaxing and healing environment and social events (VDHR, VCRIS 034-0110; Historic Jordan Springs 2021; Allen 2001; Cartmell 1909:297). After Edwin Jordan died in 1890, his son, Clarendon, inherited the property and built the current brick building ca. 1893. Built on the foundation of the 1832 carriage house, the new building appears to have been attached to the 1832 hotel and was constructed of brick made on the property. Around the turn of the century, however, the hotel lost its popularity and Jordan sold the property to his brother- in-law Col. Henry Baker in 1905. Baker leased out the the hotel until the resort closed in 1916 (VDHR, VCRIS 034-0110; Historic Jordan Springs 2021; Allen 2001; Cartmell 1909:297). Although several owners tried to reopen the resort, the hotel remained largely closed until W.H.M. Stover purchased it during World War II in 1942 and repaired the buildings after the war in the late 1940s. He reopened it on a limited basis in 1949 when it regained some popularity, especially among local residents who used the grounds for picnics, camping, baseball, and swimming. In 1951, the Franklin Foundation leased the property for use as a school. After the school failed, the Missionary Servants of the Most Holy Trinity purchased the property in 1953, in order to operate a Catholic Monastery and Seminary. Under their ownership, changes included replacing the Sulfur Springs pool and converting the dressing rooms into a library as well as turning the ballroom into a chapel. In 1972, the Shalom et Benidictus leased the property converting it into a drug and alcohol rehabilitation center for teenagers. After the treatment center closed in 1999, County Court Reporters Inc. purchased the property for use as their headquarters and converted the main building into a technology and training center and a full service event venue. In the same year, the Jordan White Sulfur Springs became the first property in Frederick County Virginia to receive a Historic Overlay District (VDHR, VCRIS 034-0110; Historic Jordan Springs 2021; Allen 2001). 95 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 3 of 8 This resource is within both the Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District (034-5023) and the Milburn Rural Historic District (034-5035) boundaries and was also determined individually eligible for listing in the NRHP under Criteria A and C by the Virginia State Review Board in 1993. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Hotel/Inn NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1832 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning, Commerce/Trade, Recreation/Arts, Settlement Patterns Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:L-Plan Number of Stories:3.5 Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: a very large spa buildings... ---------------------- June 1992 May 2021: The 237-acre Jordan White Sulfur Springs property contains six buildings: the hotel, a cabin, an office, a pergola set over the spring, a workshop, and a shed. The L-shaped hotel consists of the 1893 three-and-a-half-story front brick block and a two-and-a-half-story limestone based rear wing, which appears to have been the original 1832 hotel. The brick is laid in seven-course American bond brick. The cross-hipped roof is covered in asphalt shingles and pierced by six gable dormers. There is a stepped brick pattern at the cornice line. The hotel rests on a tall stone foundation wall with a walkout basement on the south elevation. The façade has nine-bays that are separated by brick pilasters that stretch the entire height of the building. The two front entrances are protected by a two-story wrap-around porch. The porch is covered in asphalt shingles and supported by wood posts. The rear wing has a large interior brick chimney on the ridge line. The windows are vertical configured 2- over-2 double-hung sash wood with stone sills. All of the window openings on the first, second, and basement stories are topped with brick curved segmental arched lintels, while the window openings on the third story are topped with brick flat arched lintels. Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Gable Asphalt Shingle Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 2/2 Roof Hipped Asphalt Shingle Chimneys Interior Brick No Data Porch Wrap-Around Wood No Data Structural System and Exterior Treatment Masonry Brick Bond, American, 7-course Dormer Gable Asphalt No Data Foundation Solid/Continuous Limestone Coursed Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 96 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 4 of 8 Resource Category:DSS Legacy Resource Type:Shed Date of Construction:1950Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning Architectural Style:No discernible style Form:Rectangular Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Neglect Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: June 1992 May 2021: The shed is a frame building resting on a parged foundation and clad in wood siding. The side gable roof is covered in standing seam metal. Interior Plan:Open Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Wood Weatherboard Foundation Solid/Continuous Unknown Stuccoed/Parged Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Commerce/Trade Resource Type:Office/Office Building Date of Construction:1954Ca Date Source:Local Records Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning Architectural Style:Ranch Form:Rectangular Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: June 1992 May 2021: Constructed in 1954, the office is a Ranch style building clad in a brick veneer topped by a hipped roof covered in asphalt shingles. There is an interior brick chimney on the west roof slope, while the windows are vinyl casement. Interior Plan:Irregular Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Masonry Brick Veneer Roof Hipped Asphalt No Data Chimneys Interior Slope Brick Strecther Bond Windows Casement Vinyl No Data Foundation Solid/Continuous Brick Block Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:Domestic 97 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 5 of 8 Resource Type:Secondary Dwelling Date of Construction:1840Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Antebellum Period (1830 - 1860) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning Architectural Style:Folk Victorian Form:I-House Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Neglect Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: the one remaining cabin that the spa rented out. ---------------------- June 1992 May 2021: Located directly northeast of the hotel, the two-story, wood frame cabin rests on a tall stone foundation wall. The cabin is clad in wood siding and the side gable roof is covered in standing seam metal. There is an end exterior brick chimney on the east elevation. The windows are 6-over-6 double-hung sash wood and 1-over-1 double-hung sash vinyl flanked by shutters. The front entrance is protected by a three- bay, one-story porch. The porch has an asphalt shingle-clad shed roof supported by wood posts with decorative sawnwork in the wood balustrade. Additional investigation may reveal that this building was constructed soon after the original hotel was built, but may date as late as 1880. Interior Plan:Center Hall Number of Stories:2 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Structural System and Exterior Treatment Wood Frame Wood Weatherboard Chimneys Exterior End Brick American/Common Bond Roof Side Gable Metal No Data Porch 1-Story Full-Width Wood Square Windows Double-hung Wood No Data Foundation Solid/Continuous Limestone Coursed Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Workshop Date of Construction:1941Ca Date Source:Local Records Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning Architectural Style:Vernacular Form:Rectangular Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Neglect Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: June 1992 May 2021: The 1941 workshop is a two-story, concrete block building with a shed roof covered in asphalt shingles. The façade has four garage openings with original wood garage doors. The windows are 6-over-1, wood double-hung sash with brick sills. Number of Stories:2 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Shed Asphalt No Data Structural System and Exterior Treatment Masonry Concrete Block Windows Double-hung Wood No Data Foundation Slab Concrete Veneer 98 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 6 of 8 Secondary Resource #5 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Spring/Spring House Date of Construction:1917Ca Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:World War I to World War II (1917 - 1945) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Community Planning Architectural Style:Classical Revival Form:Octagon Condition:Good Threats to Resource:None Known Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: octagonal spring house... pergola with a shallow conical roof, supports are baseless doric columns. ---------------------- June 1992 May 2021: . Built prior to 1917, the spring has an open, octagonal pergola with a conical roof supported by parged brick Doric columns (Historic Jordan Springs 2021). Interior Plan:Open Number of Stories:1 Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Roof Other Asphalt No Data Foundation Slab Concrete Veneer Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0110 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:1/31/2022 Staff Comment Review File No.: 2021-0163 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2021-0163 Investigator:Lily Hutzell Organization/Company:Cardno Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/17/2021 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-170 Project Staff/Notes: Kimberly Hinder and Lillian Hutzell, Architectural Historians, Phase I Cultural Resource Survey: Redbud Run Solar Project, Fredrick County, 99 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 7 of 8 Virginia, August 2021, James Ambrosino, Valerie Nobles. Project Bibliographic Information: Valerie Nobles, Lillian Hutzell, Kimberly Hinder, James N. Ambrosino Phase I Cultural Resource Identification Survey Redbud Run Solar Project, Frederick County, Virginia (Dec 2021) Prepared for Origen, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Prepared by Cardno, Inc., Wake Forest, North Carolina. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History, C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: DHR Board: Eligible DHR ID:034-0110 Staff Name:State Review Board Event Date:10/19/1993 Staff Comment No Data Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-0110 Staff Name:DHR Event Date:8/16/1993 Staff Comment Sulphur Spring Spa (Jordan Spring), Frederick County (DHR 34-110), was rated at the regional level for significance in the area of architecture and recreation. It was found to be eligible with a score of 37. Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID:034-0110 Staff Name:Mitchell, Bryan Event Date:10/1/1992 Staff Comment No Data Event Type: Survey:Windshield Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, Maral S. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:6/1/1992 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: interior and exterior photographs of the property Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History, C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, Maral S. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:11/1/1989 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History, C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance 100 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-0110 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 8 of 8 Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Quinn, Michael C. Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:8/11/1973 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History, C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Bibliographic Information Bibliography: May 2021: Allen, Tim 2001“First Historic Overlay Zone Sought.” The Winchester Star. October 18. Accessed in July 2021, VCRIS File 034-5035. Cartmell, T.K. 1909Frederick County, Virginia, Shenandoah Valley Pioneers and Their Descendants. Accessed August 2021, www.ancestry.com. Gillespie, G.L. 1873Battlefield of Winchester (Opequon) [September 19, 1864] (map). Electronic document, https://www.loc.gov/item/99446372/. Historic Jordan Springs 2021“History.” Accessed August 2021, https://historicjordansprings.com/category/history/. Varle, Charles, and Benjamin Jones 1809Map of Frederick, Berkeley, & Jefferson counties in the state of Virginia (map). Philadelphia. Electronic document, https://www.loc.gov/resource/g3883f.la001258/?r=0.403,0.822,0.188,0.112,0. Property Notes: May 2021: This property is now a combination corporate headquarters and event space. Access was not an issue. 101 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/24/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.102 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 1 of 6 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Descriptive Apple Pie Ridge/West Fort Parcel Historic Second Winchester Battlefield Property Addresses Current - U.S. Route 522 County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County), Winchester (Ind. City) Incorporated Town(s):Stephens City Zip Code(s):22601, 22602, 22603, 22624, 22655, 22656 Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):STEPHENS CITY, STEPHENSON, WINCHESTER Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:18,133 Site Description: January 2007: This battlefield land remains much as it was over 100 years ago. State Route 37 divides this parcel but it is visually well preserved, and maintained as pasture and apple orchards. The city of Winchester is located to the south of the battlefield. There are four dwellings on the parcel west of Route 37; the Harmon House, a masonry house and a small stone cottage built in the early 1930s, and a ranch house built in the 1950s. FOR MORE DETAILS ON THE LOCATION OF THESE STRUCTURES IN RELATION TO THE BATTLEFIELD PLEASE SEE FILE. May 2014: This battlefield's site and setting has not greatly altered since the previous surveys. March 2018: The site and setting of the northern portion of this battlefield have not been greatly altered since it was previously surveyed. May 2019: The portion of the battlefield within the vicinity of the project area has been impacted by the construction of modern residential developments on the south side of Berryville Pike and modern commercial buildings as well as the Millbrook High School and Redbud Run Elementary School, as well as modern residential development on the north side of Berryville Pike. May 2021:The Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC), which was created by Congress in 1991, identified the Second Winchester Battlefield as a historically significant Civil War site. The Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 instructed the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) of the National Park Service to update the findings of the CWSAC. The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District (034-5023) is a Civil War-era battlefield located in and around the city of Winchester in Fredrick County, Virginia. According to the ABPP, the district covers approximately 18,133 acres incorporating the routes of Confederate approach and flanking movements and the Union retreat route and surrender site involved with the battle (ABPP 2009:319- 21; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District is located along the center of the APE incorporating the western edge of the project footprint along Woods Mill Road. The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District runs north-south from the northern boundary of the APE along Jordan Springs Road, and then turns southwest along Woods Mill Road to the southern edge of the APE and extending further west along Redbud Road to the western boundary of the APE. The APE does not extend into the core areas of the district according to the ABPP boundaries (ABPP 2009:321; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). Surveyor Assessment: Start Year: 1863 Date Source: Site Visit Type: Historical Event Notes: Louisiana brigade under the command of Gen. Hays attacked West Fort. Battle lasted for 45 minutes. Union soldiers retreated north, and stage was set for the Battle of Gettysburg. ----------------------------- January 2007: This land is the site of Phase Five and Phase Six of the Second Battle of Winchester. The latter part of Phase Five occurred in mid-afternoon on the 14th of June, 1863. The Confederate forces were commanded by Gen. Richard S. Ewell. The two divisions of the Second Corps of the Army of Northern Virginia involved in this campaign were led by Edward Johnson and Jubal Early. The surprise attack on the Union forces at West Fort began around six p.m. and lasted approximately 45 minutes. The Union forces were forced to retreat, ultimately setting the stage for the battle of Gettysburg. 103 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 2 of 6 May 2014: The Second Winchester Battlefield was listed on the NRHP and determined eligible under Criterion A. The aspects of this resource that made it eligible for the NRHP have not been significantly altered since it was listed. As such, Dovtail recommends that it should remain eligible for and listed on the NRHP. March 2018: Only the northern portion of the Battlefield Study Area was surveyed at this time. There have been no changes to this battlefield that would alter the previous determination of eligible for listing on the NRHP. May 2019: Overall the integrity of the Second Battle of Winchester within the current study area has been severely compromised by the modern construction and the widening of Berryville Pike during the mid-twentieth century. As a result, limited undisturbed areas of the battlefield resource are present in the vicinity of the project area. Areas beyond the survey area were not evaluated. May 2021: Fought from June 13th to 15th, 1863, the Second Battle of Winchester was a part of the Gettysburg Campaign commanded by Confederate General Robert E. Lee (National Park Service 2020). On June 7th, 1863, General Lee gathered 70,000 confederate forces in central Virginia, with the intent to invade the Potomac, take Washington D.C. and Philadelphia. On June 10th, General Lee ordered Confederate Lieutenant General Richard S. Ewell to march north towards the Shenandoah Valley to invade the Blue Ridge Mountains and capture Winchester, Virginia (NPS 2020a; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). At the time, Union Major General Robert H. Malroy, held 8,000 Union forces in the Confederate sympathizing City of Winchester. Although General Malroy received numerous reports of General Ewell’s intention to invade, Malroy did very little to prepare for the possible invasion or to even evacuate. It was not until General Ewell attacked the southern town of Middletown, Virginia that General Malroy decided send out infantry to defend Winchester. Early on the morning of June 13th, General Ewell commanded 14,000 troops to attack Winchester and the surrounding villages, cutting off any possible escape by the Union troops. The Battle raged on for two more days before Confederate forces captured the City of Winchester (NPS 2020a; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). The district was determined eligible for listing in the NRHP and the Virginia Landmarks Register (VLR) by the Virginia State Review Board in 1999. Within the APE, much of the landscape within the Second Battlefield of Winchester has been altered, including the construction of many modern dwellings and paved roads. More modern developments and widening of the Berryville Pike have impacted the district along the southern edge of the APE. While an evaluation of the historic district in its entirety is beyond the scope of the current survey, 33 properties within the APE are within the district boundaries. However, only two (034-0110 and 034-1157) were present at the time of the battle, which is the period of significance for the district. As a result, the remaining 31 resources are not considered contributing to the district. Although the portion of the Second Battlefield of Winchester that is within the APE may retain some of its historic landscape features, the majority of the essential features of the Battlefield are located outside of the APE. Areas of the district beyond the APE were not evaluated. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Associate Property Associate Name Property Associate Role Yonley, Alma Owner Yonley, Lizzie Owner Early, Jubal Other Ewell, Richard S.Other Hays, Harry T.Other Johnson, Edward Other Milroy, R.H.Other Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Defense Resource Type:Battle Site NR Resource Type:Site Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:1863 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Civil War (1861 - 1865) Historic Context(s):Military/Defense Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Other Form:No Data Number of Stories:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Development, Public Utility Expansion, Transportation Expansion Cultural Affiliations:Other Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data 104 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 3 of 6 Architectural Description: January 2007: This land, owned by Fruit Hill Orchard, Inc., is the site of Phase Five and Phase Six of the Second Battle of Winchester. The latter part of Phase Five occurred in mid-afternoon on the 14th of June, 1863. Union troops had withdrawn into three forts, West Fort being one of them. The fort was stormed by Gen. Hays' Louisiana brigade, and the ridge where West Fort was located became known as "Louisiana Ridge." The Harmon House was in the midst of the fire, and was used as a hospital for the Louisiana brigade. With the withdrawal of Union troops to the north, this battle set the stage for the Battle of Gettysburg. May 2014: The Second Winchester Battlefield has not been significantly altered since the previous survey. March 2018: The site and setting of the northern portion of this battlefield have not been greatly altered since it was previously surveyed. May 2019: Overall the integrity of the Second Battle of Winchester within the current study area has been severely compromised by the modern construction and the widening of Berryville Pike during the mid-twentieth century. As a result, limited undisturbed areas of the battlefield resource are present in the vicinity of the project area. Areas beyond the survey area were not evaluated. ---------------------- May 2019 May 2021: The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District is located along the center of the APE incorporating the western edge of the project footprint along Woods Mill Road. The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District runs north-south from the northern boundary of the APE along Jordan Springs Road, and then turns southwest along Woods Mill Road to the southern edge of the APE and extending further west along Redbud Road to the western boundary of the APE. The APE does not extend into the core areas of the district according to the ABPP boundaries (ABPP 2009:321; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). Within the APE, much of the landscape within the Second Battlefield of Winchester has been altered, including the construction of many modern dwellings and paved roads. More modern developments and widening of the Berryville Pike have impacted the district along the southern edge of the APE. While an evaluation of the historic district in its entirety is beyond the scope of the current survey, 33 properties within the APE are within the district boundaries. However, only two (034-0110 and 034-1157) were present at the time of the battle, which is the period of significance for the district. As a result, the remaining 31 resources are not considered contributing to the district. Although the portion of the Second Battlefield of Winchester that is within the APE may retain some of its historic landscape features, the majority of the essential features of the Battlefield are located outside of the APE. Areas of the district beyond the APE were not evaluated. Secondary Resource Information Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-5023 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:1/31/2022 Staff Comment Review File No.: 2021-0163 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2021-0163 Investigator:Lily Hutzell Organization/Company:Cardno Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/17/2021 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-170 Project Staff/Notes: 105 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 4 of 6 Kimberly Hinder and Lillian Hutzell, Architectural Historians, Phase I Cultural Resource Survey: Redbud Run Solar Project, Fredrick County, Virginia, August 2021, James Ambrosino, Valerie Nobles. Project Bibliographic Information: Valerie Nobles, Lillian Hutzell, Kimberly Hinder, James N. Ambrosino Phase I Cultural Resource Identification Survey Redbud Run Solar Project, Frederick County, Virginia (Dec 2021) Prepared for Origen, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Prepared by Cardno, Inc., Wake Forest, North Carolina. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2020-0122 Investigator:Sandra DeChard Organization/Company:Stantec 2034 Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/29/2019 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-160 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Donald Sadler, Sandra DeChard, Brynn Stewart Reference: A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Millbrook Substation and Powerline Corridors Project, Frederick County, Virginia Firm: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc (June 28, 2019) DHR Report No: FK-160 DHR Project No.: 2020-0122 Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2017-4024 Investigator:Sarah Traum Organization/Company:Commonwealth Heritage Group, Alexandria Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:3/12/2018 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Reconnaissance level architectural resources survey prior to proposed Opequon Water Supply Plan, in Frederick County for ARCADIS US. Sarah Traum conducted the field survey in March 2018. Sarah Traum completed the VCRIS documentation. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2014-0348 Investigator:Heather Dollins Organization/Company:Dovetail CRG Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/5/2014 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-120 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Dollins, Heather, Kevin McCloskey and Emily Taggart Schricker Phase I Cultural Resource Survey and Phase II Evaluation of Site 44FK0765 for the National Avenue Gateway Improvement Project, Winchester, Virginia Dovetail Cultural Resource Group, Fredericksburg, Virginia. July 2014. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Other 106 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 5 of 6 Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:ABPP Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/24/2007 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Preliminary survey data from the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) indicates that this historic Civil War battlefield is likely eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and likely deserving of future preservation efforts. This survey information should be reassessed during future Section 106/NEPA compliance reviews. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Gossett, Tanya Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/13/2005 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: The American Battlefield Protection Program and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources agree that where a joint undertaking is to be located within or near a Civil War battlefield surveyed by the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (1991-1993), the ABPP and the VDHR will recommend that the Federal agency (or its designee or the designee's consultant) take into account lands within the Study Areas of those battlefields when identifying the historic property and assessing effects to the historic property in Section 106 reviews. Both the ABPP and the VDHR will recommend systematic metal detector surveys and other field methods appropriate to battlefields for Phase I work where a proposed undertaking may have a direct effect on the historic property/battlefield. Please see also the CWSAC data within the file for the battlefield. The VDHR GIS includes the full boundaries of the CWSAC study areas for battlefields recorded within the VDHR architectural inventory, unless VDHR has refined the boundary by evaluation of integrity and eligibility, or unless the battlefield is listed in the National Register. The ABPP asks that the full study area be evaluated, even in cases where a National Register boundary exists. Many National Register boundaries were drawn to exclude eligible areas for political reasons or owner objections, and therefore do not represent the entire eligible battlefield. In cases where VDHR has refined the boundaries of a battlefield to lands eligible for the National Register, the study area is presumed by both the VDHR and the ABPP to be obsolete. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:No Data Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/18/2000 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: DHR Board: Eligible DHR ID:034-5023 Staff Name:State Review Board Event Date:3/1/1999 Staff Comment No Data Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-5023 Staff Name:DHR 107 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 6 of 6 Event Date:11/24/1998 Staff Comment ALso called CWSAC-VA107. Second Battle of Winchester, Frederick Co., VDHR Number 34-5023. The resource, considered for its national significance under Criterion A (Military History), was found eligible with a score of 42 points. Bibliographic Information Bibliography: May 2021: American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) 2009Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission’s Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields: Commonwealth of Virginia. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Electronic document, https://www.nps.gov/abpp/cwsii/CWSACReportVirginiaUpdate.pdf.Accessed March 2018. 2012Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Draft v. 6, for public review. Electronic document, https://www.eenews.net/assets/2012/09/12/ document_gw_03.pdf. Accessed March 2018. Property Notes: Name: C. Robert Solenberger Company 1: Fruit Hill Orchards, Inc. Address 1: P.O. Box 2368 City: Winchester State: Virginia ZIP: 22604 May 2021: This survey was conducted largely from the public right-of-way. 108 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Points County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/24/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.109 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5035 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 1 of 3 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Current Milburn Rural Historic District Property Addresses Alternate - Route 664 Alternate - Route 761 Current - U.S. 11 County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):22603, 22656 Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):STEPHENSON Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:268 Site Description: Milburn Rural Historic District is located to the northeast of the city of Winchester along Routes 761 and 664 and U.S. 11. 1997: The cultural landscape in this area includes both natural and manmade features. The topography, soils, climate, natural vegetation and water resources influence lard uses, circulation networks and spatial organization in this area. Many of the farmhouses and their outbuildings stand adjacent to creeks. The stone-walled Milburn cemetery is situated on Milburn Road and across the road is the stone springhouse and barn ruins of the Helm House. Stone walls and wire fences, along with the rolling topography, create.a pattern of fields and pasture. The roads and railroad maintain their historic alignment. This evidence of activity of the former and present owners reflect the "beliefs, attitudes, traditions, and values". Taken together, the historic resources in the Milburn area create a landscape that retains a high degree of integrity with very little modern intrusion. ----------------------------- The district includes Milburn, the Helm House, Milburn Chapel and Cemetery, the Byers House, Jordan White Sulphur Springs and the Tenant House. May 2021: Located northeast of the city of Winchester, the Milburn Rural Historic District (034-5035) is a cultural landscape roughly bounded by Jordan Springs Road, Old Charles Town Road, Martinsburg Pike, and Lick Run. Located on the northwestern edge of the APE, the Milburn Rural Historic District encompasses both natural and manmade features including a cluster of historic resources such as the Milburn House (034-0729), the Byers House (034-1124), Stephenson’s Depot Battlefield (034-0720), the Helm House/Fort Helm (034-0703), the Milburn Chapel Site and Cemetery (034-0950), the Carter-Hardesty House (034-0112), and the Jordan White Sulphur Springs (034-0110) (VDHR, VCRIS 034-5035). Of these, only the Jordan White Sulphur Springs (034-0110) is within the APE. Surveyor Assessment: Several Civil War battles were fought on the site of the proposed Milburn Rural Historic District. The Second and Third Battles of Winchester saw significant troop movement and fighting in this entire area. 1997: Historic resources in this landscape date from the eighteenth, nineteenth, and early twentieth centuries in the areas of architecture, agriculture, religion, military, funerary, and recreation. The Milburn area appears to be eligible for the NRHP under Criteria A and C. It is significant under Criterion A as for its links with the rise of a specific religious group in this area, the Methodists, and for the actions that took place here during the Battle of Stephenson's Depot. It is significant under Criterion C for the types and methods of construction of the buildings and structures that pattern this landscape. The boundaries for this proposed district should be drawn to include Milburn (34-729), the Byers House (34-1124), the Milburn Chapel Site and Cemetery (34-950), Fort Helm/Helm House (34-703), the tenant house (34-728) and possibly the Carter-Hardesty House depending upon its integrity. Jordan White Sulphur Spring may also be included in this district. The area along the Charlestown Road (Route 761) has developed residentially during the twentieth century and should not be included in the district. These resources are in an area roughly bounded on the west by the railroad, on the north and east by the rear property line of the houses along Route 761, and on the south by the property line of the tract on which the tenant house sits. May 2021: The heart of the district, the Milburn estate, encompasses 268 acres of land incorporating the mid-nineteenth century Milburn House along with many of its original domestic and agricultural outbuildings. Named after one of its earliest owners, John Milburn was a prominent Methodist minister in Frederick County who constructed a Methodist church and cemetery on his property at the end of the eighteenth century. The rural historic district also incorporates lands from the major Civil War battles in the Shenandoah Valley including the Stephenson’s Depot Battlefield, the Second Battle of Winchester and the Opequon Battle (Third Battle of Winchester). VDHR staff determined the Milburn Rural Historic District eligible for NRHP listing under Criteria A and C in 1997 (VDHR, VCRIS 034-5035; Gray and Pape 1997). Today, much of the landscape within the Milburn Historic District has been altered, including many modern dwellings and paved roads. However, the essential residential properties, the cemetery, and the battlefield remain intact. The portion of Milburn Historic 110 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5035 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 2 of 3 District that is within the APE, only includes the Jordan White Sulfur Springs , which retains its integrity and significance, while the additional properties are located outside of the APE Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Other Resource Type:Historic District NR Resource Type:District Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1735 Date Source:Site Visit/Written Data Historic Time Period:Contact Period (1607 - 1750) Historic Context(s):Architecture/Landscape, Military/Defense, Religion, Subsistence/Agriculture Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:No Discernable Style Form:No Data Number of Stories:No Data Condition:Good Threats to Resource:Transportation Expansion Cultural Affiliations:Euro-American Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Milburn Rural Historic District contains several historic structures, including the Helm House (1730), Milburn Chapel and Cemetery (1788), Milburn (1800), the Byers House (1860), the Tenant House (1880) and Jordan White Sulphur Spring (1830). ---------------------- May 2021: Located northeast of the city of Winchester, the Milburn Rural Historic District (034-5035) is a cultural landscape roughly bounded by Jordan Springs Road, Old Charles Town Road, Martinsburg Pike, and Lick Run. Located on the northwestern edge of the APE, the Milburn Rural Historic District encompasses both natural and manmade features including a cluster of historic resources such as the Milburn House (034- 0729), the Byers House (034-1124), Stephenson’s Depot Battlefield (034-0720), the Helm House/Fort Helm (034-0703), the Milburn Chapel Site and Cemetery (034-0950), the Carter-Hardesty House (034-0112), and the Jordan White Sulphur Springs (034-0110) (VDHR, VCRIS 034- 5035). The portion of Milburn Historic District that is within the APE, only includes the Jordan White Sulfur Springs, which retains its integrity and significance, while the additional properties are located outside of the APE. Secondary Resource Information Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible 111 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5035 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 3 of 3 DHR ID:034-5035 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:1/31/2022 Staff Comment Review File No.: 2021-0163 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2021-0163 Investigator:Lily Hutzell Organization/Company:Cardno Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/17/2021 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-170 Project Staff/Notes: Kimberly Hinder and Lillian Hutzell, Architectural Historians, Phase I Cultural Resource Survey: Redbud Run Solar Project, Fredrick County, Virginia, August 2021, James Ambrosino, Valerie Nobles. Project Bibliographic Information: Valerie Nobles, Lillian Hutzell, Kimberly Hinder, James N. Ambrosino Phase I Cultural Resource Identification Survey Redbud Run Solar Project, Frederick County, Virginia (Dec 2021) Prepared for Origen, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Prepared by Cardno, Inc., Wake Forest, North Carolina. Period Of Significance:1730-early 20th century Level Of Significance:National Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History, C - Distinctive Characteristics of Architecture/Construction Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID:034-5035 Staff Name:DHR Evaluation Committee Event Date:6/25/1997 Staff Comment No Data Bibliographic Information Bibliography: May 2021: Gray and Pape 1997Phase I and II Investigations for the Route 37 Bypass, Frederick County, VA. Accessed August 2021, VCRIS File 034-5035. Property Notes: May 2021: Only the portion of this district within the APE was surveyed as part of this project. 112 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/24/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.113 Property Photographs from VCRIS & Pictometry DHR #034-0110: Jordan White Sulfur Springs 2021 (VCRIS) 114 115 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Review of Brockton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Title: The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application #03-23 for the Brockton Property. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The property is +/- 6.39 acres (Property Identification Number 42-A-194) located on the western side of the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522) and Route 37 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. The property is currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Comprehensive Plan for long range land use classifies this property as remaining rural. The application proposes amending the long range land use to Business. Attachments: HRAB11-21-23CPPA03-23BrocktonProperty_Redacted.pdf 116 Item # 4 Brockton Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application #03-23 for the Brockton Property. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The property is +/-6.39 acres (Property Identification Number: 42-A-194) located on the western side of the intersection of N Frederick Pike (Route 522) and Route 37 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. The property is currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Comprehensive Plan long range land use classifies this property as remaining rural. The application proposes amending the long range land use from rural to business. Should the Board of Supervisors approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the subject property would still need to be rezoned, at which time the HRAB would have an opportunity to comment on more specific details. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published in 1992 by the National Park Service identifies the properties as within the study area of the Second Winchester Battlefield and had lost integrity at the time the book was published. The mapped sites identified on the properties according to the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System (VCRIS) are below. Note: only sites located on the subject properties are included in this agenda packet as the Comprehensive Plan Amendments are general in nature. If a rezoning were applied for, at that time the standard half-mile buffer radius would be applied. • 034-5023 – Second Winchester Battlefield Please find the following attachments for your information: • Location Map • Application & Attachments • Virginia DHR Surveys & maps The Applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements possibly impacted by the proposed use. The comments will be included in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application package. **If you have any questions prior to the meeting please forward them to me and I will relay them to the Applicant. 117 £¤522 ¬«37SecondWinchesterBattlefield LUNETTESTW A R N E R ST FOXRIDGE LNECHO LNASHTON DRN FREDERICKPIKE W REDOUBT LN A P P L E P I E R I D G E R D Brockton Property #Historic Rural Landmarks Civil War Battlefields Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels Map Produced by Frederick C ounty Planning and D evelopment Dept.October 25, 2023 0 0.075 0.150.0375 Miles Brockton Property I 118 119 120 121 BROCKTON PROPERTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION DETAILS AND STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION OWNER(S) INFORMATION 1. Name: Brockton Land Trust 2. Project Name: Brockton Property 3. Mailing Address: PO Box 809 Winchester, VA 22604 4. Telephone: (540) 667-1266 AUTHORIZED AGENT INFORMATION 1. Name: Pennoni Associates Inc, ATTN: David Frank 2. Project Name: Brockton Property 3. Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly St. Winchester, VA 22601 4. Telephone: (540) 771-2087 LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY OR REASON FOR THE REQUEST: The entirety of the +/-6 acres of the subject property is currently located outside and adjacent to both the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and Urban Development Area (UDA) boundaries and is located at the intersection of two major roadways, Route 37 and Route 522 Northwest Pike. This request would bring the full property within the SWSA and designate the subject property as planned Business in the Route 37 West Land Use Plan. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN AMENDMENT INFORMATION FOR MAP AMENDMENT a. PIN(s): 42-A-194 (1667 Northwest Pike) Magisterial District: Gainesboro District b. Parcel Size: 6.387 Ac (per Record Plat DB 454 PG 734 c. Plat of Area proposed for CPPA Amendment, including metes and bounds description: See Figure 1 parcel plat and deed; Figure 3 UDA boundary Relocated. d. Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Classification(s): Rural Areas See Figure 2 current Route 37 West Land Use Plan 122 e. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Classification(s): Business f. Existing Zoning and Land Use of the subject parcel: RA (Rural Areas District) – Residential use g. What use/zoning will be requested if amendment is approved? B-2 (General Business District)- Commercial h. Describe, using text and maps as necessary, the existing zoning, Comprehensive Policy Plan designations, and/or approved uses and densities along with other characteristics of the properties that are within 1 mile of subject property: Included are plan graphics showing the current Route 37 West Land Use Plan (Figure 2, the proposed map changes to the plan (Figure 3) and the comprehensive plan land uses within 1 mile of the subject change (Figure 4). The approximately 6-acre tract is bounded to the west by RA zoned property, to the south and east by the existing Route 37 By-pass Right-of-Way, and to the north the Route 522 Northwestern Pike Right-of-Way. The existing access to the subject property is the fourth leg of the existing Route 522 / Apple Pie Ridge signalized Intersection. Immediately to the north of Route 522 is the Frederick County Public Schools campus with James Wood High School and Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School. This campus encompasses most of the northeastern reaches of the 1-mile adjacent properties. In the easterly and southerly directions beyond the significant Route 37 By-pass ROW are well established and developed commercial areas and residential neighborhoods. The commercial areas are generally just to the north and south of Rt 522. The residential areas reside to the south beyond the commercial and are generally accessed via Fox Drive as it leads back into the City of Winchester. This area is a mix of traditional single-family detached residential lots and large tract residential lots. To the west of the subject property are large agricultural parcels, historically utilized as orchards, and mostly located within the Route 37 West Land Use Plan area. Finally, to the northwest and north of Route 522 are RA zoned properties currently with agricultural and residential use. The northerly reaches in this area (approximately 500 LF north and beyond the Route 522 ROW) remains RA zoned but no longer lies within the Route 37 West Land Use Area boundary. The Route 37 West Land Use Plan does not detail areas of significant development west of Route 37 as the UDA and SWSA boundaries follow the western ROW boundary of the existing roadway. The applicant would like to note that Frederick Water transmission infrastructure exists on the subject property and also outside the SWSA district boundary the application is seeking to change. See Figures 1-page 2 and 4. i. Adjoining Property Owners: See Attached List of Adjacent Owners 123 j. Justification of proposed Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment. This application addresses a relatively small parcel strategically located at an existing signalized intersection. The subject property also adjoins the current UDA and SWSA boundary lines. Furthermore, The property encompasses the southwest corner of two very key transportation corridors in Frederick County. The benefits of locating commercial areas adjacent to and along well traveled corridors are well documented. It is the applicant’s opinion that modifying the SWSA district line to include the property at this signalized intersection would benefit the county through achieving revenue generating business land use in a location where an adequate transportation network is already in place. Any future rezoning application would be required to mitigate any impacts such as access, traffic signal improvements and appropriate buffering to the RA zoned properties to the west. The proposed plan amendment would impact transportation on major roadways with capacity for the proposed change. Modifications to the existing traffic signal and any associated roadway improvements to accommodate the future business land use can be easily achieved. Highway commercial land use will generate net positive revenues for the county. This land use will not increase demands on public schools and can mitigate public safety service needs through proffer contributions during a future rezoning process. Trip Generation Brockton Property 2023 CPA Existing Residential and Agricultural Uses: +/- 10 ADT Existing Comprehensive Plan Uses: no change to ADT Proposed Comprehensive Plan Uses: +/- 5,000 ADT Commercial (6 ac): +/-5,000 ADT Commercial ITE Codes considered: 945 – Convenience Store Gas Station (Other commercial uses result in less conservative traffic impact volumes) 124 FIGURE 1-PAGE 1 125 FIGURE 1-PAGE 2 126 £¤522 £¤522 ¬«37 ¬«37 AlbinRural CommunityCenter Round HillRural CommunityCenter Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 0 0.15 0.30.075 Miles µ Route 37 WestLand Use Plan Area Plan Eastern Road Plan New Major Arterial Improved Major Arterial New Minor Arterial Improved Minor Arterial New Major Collector Improved Major Collector New Minor Collector Improved Minor Collector Ramp Roundabout Trails The Comprehensive PlanAdopted November 10, 2021 Sewer and Water Service Area Urban Development Area City ofWinchester Land Use Legend Business Residential Institutional Rural Community Center FIGURE 2 127 £¤522 £¤522 ¬«37 ¬«37 AlbinRural CommunityCenter Round HillRural CommunityCenter Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed 0 0.15 0.30.075 Miles µ Route 37 WestLand Use Plan Area Plan Eastern Road Plan New Major Arterial Improved Major Arterial New Minor Arterial Improved Minor Arterial New Major Collector Improved Major Collector New Minor Collector Improved Minor Collector Ramp Roundabout Trails The Comprehensive PlanAdopted November 10, 2021 Sewer and Water Service Area Urban Development Area City ofWinchester Land Use Legend Business Residential Institutional Rural Community Center PROPOSED BUSINESS LAND USE PROPOSED SWSA BOUNDARY FIGURE 3 128 Route 37 WestLand Use PlanArea PlanSewer and Water Service AreaUrban Development AreaLand Use LegendBusinessResidentialInstitutionalRural Community Center1-MILERADIUSFIGURE 4129 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 1 of 6 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Descriptive Apple Pie Ridge/West Fort Parcel Historic Second Winchester Battlefield Property Addresses Current - U.S. Route 522 County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County), Winchester (Ind. City) Incorporated Town(s):Stephens City Zip Code(s):22601, 22602, 22603, 22624, 22655, 22656 Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):STEPHENS CITY, STEPHENSON, WINCHESTER Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:Rural Acreage:18,133 Site Description: January 2007: This battlefield land remains much as it was over 100 years ago. State Route 37 divides this parcel but it is visually well preserved, and maintained as pasture and apple orchards. The city of Winchester is located to the south of the battlefield. There are four dwellings on the parcel west of Route 37; the Harmon House, a masonry house and a small stone cottage built in the early 1930s, and a ranch house built in the 1950s. FOR MORE DETAILS ON THE LOCATION OF THESE STRUCTURES IN RELATION TO THE BATTLEFIELD PLEASE SEE FILE. May 2014: This battlefield's site and setting has not greatly altered since the previous surveys. March 2018: The site and setting of the northern portion of this battlefield have not been greatly altered since it was previously surveyed. May 2019: The portion of the battlefield within the vicinity of the project area has been impacted by the construction of modern residential developments on the south side of Berryville Pike and modern commercial buildings as well as the Millbrook High School and Redbud Run Elementary School, as well as modern residential development on the north side of Berryville Pike. May 2021:The Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (CWSAC), which was created by Congress in 1991, identified the Second Winchester Battlefield as a historically significant Civil War site. The Civil War Battlefield Preservation Act of 2002 instructed the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) of the National Park Service to update the findings of the CWSAC. The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District (034-5023) is a Civil War-era battlefield located in and around the city of Winchester in Fredrick County, Virginia. According to the ABPP, the district covers approximately 18,133 acres incorporating the routes of Confederate approach and flanking movements and the Union retreat route and surrender site involved with the battle (ABPP 2009:319- 21; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District is located along the center of the APE incorporating the western edge of the project footprint along Woods Mill Road. The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District runs north-south from the northern boundary of the APE along Jordan Springs Road, and then turns southwest along Woods Mill Road to the southern edge of the APE and extending further west along Redbud Road to the western boundary of the APE. The APE does not extend into the core areas of the district according to the ABPP boundaries (ABPP 2009:321; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). Surveyor Assessment: Start Year: 1863 Date Source: Site Visit Type: Historical Event Notes: Louisiana brigade under the command of Gen. Hays attacked West Fort. Battle lasted for 45 minutes. Union soldiers retreated north, and stage was set for the Battle of Gettysburg. ----------------------------- January 2007: This land is the site of Phase Five and Phase Six of the Second Battle of Winchester. The latter part of Phase Five occurred in mid-afternoon on the 14th of June, 1863. The Confederate forces were commanded by Gen. Richard S. Ewell. The two divisions of the Second Corps of the Army of Northern Virginia involved in this campaign were led by Edward Johnson and Jubal Early. The surprise attack on the Union forces at West Fort began around six p.m. and lasted approximately 45 minutes. The Union forces were forced to retreat, ultimately setting the stage for the battle of Gettysburg. 130 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 2 of 6 May 2014: The Second Winchester Battlefield was listed on the NRHP and determined eligible under Criterion A. The aspects of this resource that made it eligible for the NRHP have not been significantly altered since it was listed. As such, Dovtail recommends that it should remain eligible for and listed on the NRHP. March 2018: Only the northern portion of the Battlefield Study Area was surveyed at this time. There have been no changes to this battlefield that would alter the previous determination of eligible for listing on the NRHP. May 2019: Overall the integrity of the Second Battle of Winchester within the current study area has been severely compromised by the modern construction and the widening of Berryville Pike during the mid-twentieth century. As a result, limited undisturbed areas of the battlefield resource are present in the vicinity of the project area. Areas beyond the survey area were not evaluated. May 2021: Fought from June 13th to 15th, 1863, the Second Battle of Winchester was a part of the Gettysburg Campaign commanded by Confederate General Robert E. Lee (National Park Service 2020). On June 7th, 1863, General Lee gathered 70,000 confederate forces in central Virginia, with the intent to invade the Potomac, take Washington D.C. and Philadelphia. On June 10th, General Lee ordered Confederate Lieutenant General Richard S. Ewell to march north towards the Shenandoah Valley to invade the Blue Ridge Mountains and capture Winchester, Virginia (NPS 2020a; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). At the time, Union Major General Robert H. Malroy, held 8,000 Union forces in the Confederate sympathizing City of Winchester. Although General Malroy received numerous reports of General Ewell’s intention to invade, Malroy did very little to prepare for the possible invasion or to even evacuate. It was not until General Ewell attacked the southern town of Middletown, Virginia that General Malroy decided send out infantry to defend Winchester. Early on the morning of June 13th, General Ewell commanded 14,000 troops to attack Winchester and the surrounding villages, cutting off any possible escape by the Union troops. The Battle raged on for two more days before Confederate forces captured the City of Winchester (NPS 2020a; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). The district was determined eligible for listing in the NRHP and the Virginia Landmarks Register (VLR) by the Virginia State Review Board in 1999. Within the APE, much of the landscape within the Second Battlefield of Winchester has been altered, including the construction of many modern dwellings and paved roads. More modern developments and widening of the Berryville Pike have impacted the district along the southern edge of the APE. While an evaluation of the historic district in its entirety is beyond the scope of the current survey, 33 properties within the APE are within the district boundaries. However, only two (034-0110 and 034-1157) were present at the time of the battle, which is the period of significance for the district. As a result, the remaining 31 resources are not considered contributing to the district. Although the portion of the Second Battlefield of Winchester that is within the APE may retain some of its historic landscape features, the majority of the essential features of the Battlefield are located outside of the APE. Areas of the district beyond the APE were not evaluated. Surveyor Recommendation:Recommended Eligible Ownership Ownership Category Ownership Entity Private No Data Associate Property Associate Name Property Associate Role Yonley, Alma Owner Yonley, Lizzie Owner Early, Jubal Other Ewell, Richard S.Other Hays, Harry T.Other Johnson, Edward Other Milroy, R.H.Other Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Defense Resource Type:Battle Site NR Resource Type:Site Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:1863 Date Source:Written Data Historic Time Period:Civil War (1861 - 1865) Historic Context(s):Military/Defense Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Other Form:No Data Number of Stories:No Data Condition:Fair Threats to Resource:Development, Public Utility Expansion, Transportation Expansion Cultural Affiliations:Other Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data 131 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 3 of 6 Architectural Description: January 2007: This land, owned by Fruit Hill Orchard, Inc., is the site of Phase Five and Phase Six of the Second Battle of Winchester. The latter part of Phase Five occurred in mid-afternoon on the 14th of June, 1863. Union troops had withdrawn into three forts, West Fort being one of them. The fort was stormed by Gen. Hays' Louisiana brigade, and the ridge where West Fort was located became known as "Louisiana Ridge." The Harmon House was in the midst of the fire, and was used as a hospital for the Louisiana brigade. With the withdrawal of Union troops to the north, this battle set the stage for the Battle of Gettysburg. May 2014: The Second Winchester Battlefield has not been significantly altered since the previous survey. March 2018: The site and setting of the northern portion of this battlefield have not been greatly altered since it was previously surveyed. May 2019: Overall the integrity of the Second Battle of Winchester within the current study area has been severely compromised by the modern construction and the widening of Berryville Pike during the mid-twentieth century. As a result, limited undisturbed areas of the battlefield resource are present in the vicinity of the project area. Areas beyond the survey area were not evaluated. ---------------------- May 2019 May 2021: The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District is located along the center of the APE incorporating the western edge of the project footprint along Woods Mill Road. The Second Winchester Battlefield Historic District runs north-south from the northern boundary of the APE along Jordan Springs Road, and then turns southwest along Woods Mill Road to the southern edge of the APE and extending further west along Redbud Road to the western boundary of the APE. The APE does not extend into the core areas of the district according to the ABPP boundaries (ABPP 2009:321; VDHR, VCRIS 034-5023). Within the APE, much of the landscape within the Second Battlefield of Winchester has been altered, including the construction of many modern dwellings and paved roads. More modern developments and widening of the Berryville Pike have impacted the district along the southern edge of the APE. While an evaluation of the historic district in its entirety is beyond the scope of the current survey, 33 properties within the APE are within the district boundaries. However, only two (034-0110 and 034-1157) were present at the time of the battle, which is the period of significance for the district. As a result, the remaining 31 resources are not considered contributing to the district. Although the portion of the Second Battlefield of Winchester that is within the APE may retain some of its historic landscape features, the majority of the essential features of the Battlefield are located outside of the APE. Areas of the district beyond the APE were not evaluated. Secondary Resource Information Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-5023 Staff Name:Adrienne Birge-Wilson Event Date:1/31/2022 Staff Comment Review File No.: 2021-0163 Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2021-0163 Investigator:Lily Hutzell Organization/Company:Cardno Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/17/2021 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-170 Project Staff/Notes: 132 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 4 of 6 Kimberly Hinder and Lillian Hutzell, Architectural Historians, Phase I Cultural Resource Survey: Redbud Run Solar Project, Fredrick County, Virginia, August 2021, James Ambrosino, Valerie Nobles. Project Bibliographic Information: Valerie Nobles, Lillian Hutzell, Kimberly Hinder, James N. Ambrosino Phase I Cultural Resource Identification Survey Redbud Run Solar Project, Frederick County, Virginia (Dec 2021) Prepared for Origen, LLC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Prepared by Cardno, Inc., Wake Forest, North Carolina. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2020-0122 Investigator:Sandra DeChard Organization/Company:Stantec 2034 Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/29/2019 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-160 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Name: Donald Sadler, Sandra DeChard, Brynn Stewart Reference: A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey of the Proposed Millbrook Substation and Powerline Corridors Project, Frederick County, Virginia Firm: Stantec Consulting Services, Inc (June 28, 2019) DHR Report No: FK-160 DHR Project No.: 2020-0122 Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2017-4024 Investigator:Sarah Traum Organization/Company:Commonwealth Heritage Group, Alexandria Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:3/12/2018 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Reconnaissance level architectural resources survey prior to proposed Opequon Water Supply Plan, in Frederick County for ARCADIS US. Sarah Traum conducted the field survey in March 2018. Sarah Traum completed the VCRIS documentation. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:2014-0348 Investigator:Heather Dollins Organization/Company:Dovetail CRG Photographic Media:Digital Survey Date:5/5/2014 Dhr Library Report Number:FK-120 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Project Bibliographic Information: Dollins, Heather, Kevin McCloskey and Emily Taggart Schricker Phase I Cultural Resource Survey and Phase II Evaluation of Site 44FK0765 for the National Avenue Gateway Improvement Project, Winchester, Virginia Dovetail Cultural Resource Group, Fredericksburg, Virginia. July 2014. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Other 133 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 5 of 6 Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:ABPP Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/24/2007 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: Preliminary survey data from the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) indicates that this historic Civil War battlefield is likely eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places and likely deserving of future preservation efforts. This survey information should be reassessed during future Section 106/NEPA compliance reviews. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Other Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Gossett, Tanya Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:9/13/2005 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: The American Battlefield Protection Program and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources agree that where a joint undertaking is to be located within or near a Civil War battlefield surveyed by the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission (1991-1993), the ABPP and the VDHR will recommend that the Federal agency (or its designee or the designee's consultant) take into account lands within the Study Areas of those battlefields when identifying the historic property and assessing effects to the historic property in Section 106 reviews. Both the ABPP and the VDHR will recommend systematic metal detector surveys and other field methods appropriate to battlefields for Phase I work where a proposed undertaking may have a direct effect on the historic property/battlefield. Please see also the CWSAC data within the file for the battlefield. The VDHR GIS includes the full boundaries of the CWSAC study areas for battlefields recorded within the VDHR architectural inventory, unless VDHR has refined the boundary by evaluation of integrity and eligibility, or unless the battlefield is listed in the National Register. The ABPP asks that the full study area be evaluated, even in cases where a National Register boundary exists. Many National Register boundaries were drawn to exclude eligible areas for political reasons or owner objections, and therefore do not represent the entire eligible battlefield. In cases where VDHR has refined the boundaries of a battlefield to lands eligible for the National Register, the study area is presumed by both the VDHR and the ABPP to be obsolete. Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:No Data Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:1/18/2000 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data Project Staff/Notes: No Data Surveyor's NR Criteria Recommendations: A - Associated with Broad Patterns of History Event Type: DHR Board: Eligible DHR ID:034-5023 Staff Name:State Review Board Event Date:3/1/1999 Staff Comment No Data Event Type: DHR Staff: Eligible DHR ID:034-5023 Staff Name:DHR 134 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-5023 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 6 of 6 Event Date:11/24/1998 Staff Comment ALso called CWSAC-VA107. Second Battle of Winchester, Frederick Co., VDHR Number 34-5023. The resource, considered for its national significance under Criterion A (Military History), was found eligible with a score of 42 points. Bibliographic Information Bibliography: May 2021: American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) 2009Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission’s Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields: Commonwealth of Virginia. National Park Service, Washington, D.C. Electronic document, https://www.nps.gov/abpp/cwsii/CWSACReportVirginiaUpdate.pdf.Accessed March 2018. 2012Update to the Civil War Sites Advisory Commission Report on the Nation’s Civil War Battlefields. Draft v. 6, for public review. Electronic document, https://www.eenews.net/assets/2012/09/12/ document_gw_03.pdf. Accessed March 2018. Property Notes: Name: C. Robert Solenberger Company 1: Fruit Hill Orchards, Inc. Address 1: P.O. Box 2368 City: Winchester State: Virginia ZIP: 22604 May 2021: This survey was conducted largely from the public right-of-way. 135 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Points County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/24/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.136 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Review of Sargent Comprehensive Plan Amendment Title: The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment application #04-23 for the Sargent Properties. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The properties are +/- 117 acres (Property Identification Number 76-A-42) and +/- 5.00 acres (Property Identification Number 76-A-42A). The properties are located west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522), south of Tasker Road (Route 642), and east of White Oak Road (Route 636) in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Both properties are currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Comprehensive Plan long range land use classifies these properties as Mixed-Use Industrial/Office and Industrial. The application proposes amending the long range land use to High-Density Residential and Industrial. Attachments: HRAB11-21-23CPPA04-23SargentProperties_Redacted.pdf 137 Item # 5 Sargent Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application The HRAB has been asked to provide a review agency comment pertaining to a Comprehensive Plan Amendment Application #04-23 for the Sargent properties. The Frederick County Board of Supervisors reviews requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan annually. The properties are +/-117 acres (Property Identification Number: 76-A-42) and +/- 5.00 acres (PIN: 76-A-42A). The properties are located west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522 S), south of Tasker Road (Route 642), and east of White Oak Road (Route 636) in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Both properties are currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Comprehensive Plan long range land use classifies these properties as mixed-use industrial/office and industrial. The application proposes amending the long range land use to high-density residential and industrial. Should the Board of Supervisors approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the subject property would still need to be rezoned, at which time the HRAB would have an opportunity to comment on more specific details. The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published in 1992 by the National Park Service does not identify these properties as within the study area of the major Civil War Sites. The mapped sites identified on the properties according to the Virginia Cultural Resources Information System (VCRIS) are below. Note: only sites located on the subject properties are included in this agenda packet as the Comprehensive Plan Amendments are general in nature. If a rezoning were applied for, at that time the standard half-mile buffer radius would be applied. • 034-1345 – Sherman-Rogers-Sargent House Please find the following attachments for your information: • Location Map • Application & Attachments • Virginia DHR Surveys & maps The Applicant will be available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements possibly impacted by the proposed use. The comments will be included in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application package. **If you have any questions prior to the meeting please forward them to me and I will relay them to the Applicant. 138 # Sherman-Rogers-SargentHouseNELLIEGRAY CTDICKTURPIN CTFANCYCTLATIGOCTFISHERSHILL CT BRENTONCTPIEDMONTWAY BALLSBLUFF WAY RAINVILLE RDNEWMARKET DR COOLSPRING DRCHANCELLORSVILLEDR BOYDTONPLANK DRBARB CT MARCEL DRFIRSTMANASSAS PLMACEDONIA CHURCH RDTADPOLE LNTASKER RDWHITE OAK RDSargent P roperties #Historic Rural Landmarks Sewer and Water Service A rea Parcels Map Produced by Frederick C ounty Planning and D evelopment Dept.October 25, 2023 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles S a r g e n t P r o p e r t i e s I 139 140 141 142 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION DETAILS AND STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION OWNER(S) INFORMATION 1. Name: Sargent Properties LLC 2. Project Name: Sargent Property 3. Mailing Address: 13282 Lera Drive Montpelier, VA 23192 4. Telephone: 540-664-0505 AUTHORIZED AGENT INFORMATION 1. Name: Pennoni Associates Inc, ATTN: David Frank 2. Project Name: Sargent Property 3. Mailing Address: 117 E Piccadilly St. Winchester, VA 22601 4. Telephone: (540) 771-2087 LEGAL INTEREST IN THE PROPERTY OR REASON FOR THE REQUEST: The entirety of the +/-122 acres of the subject property is currently located within the SWSA boundary and adjacent the UDA. This request would bring +/- 75 acres of the property adjacent to existing residential land uses and a Frederick County public school into the UDA and planned for High-Density 6 U/A Residential and Business land uses. The remaining +/- 47 acres of the property would remain outside of the UDA and planned for Industrial land uses. PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN AMENDMENT INFORMATION FOR MAP AMENDMENT a. PIN(s): 76-A-42 & 76-A-42A (225 and 255 White Oak Road) Magisterial District: Shawnee District b. Parcel Size: 121.6943 Acres (total) +/-75 Acres (proposed UDA expansion & Land Use change) +/-47 Acres (proposed Industrial – no change) c. Plat of Area proposed for CPPA Amendment, including metes and bounds description: See Figure 1 parcel plat and deed; Figure 3 UDA boundary Relocated. 143 d. Existing Comprehensive Plan Land Use Classification(s): Mixed Use Industrial/Office and Industrial See Figures 2 and 4 existing Southern Frederick Land Use Plan (SoFred) e. Proposed Comprehensive Plan Land Use Classification(s): High-density Residential, 6 U/A and Industrial f. Existing Zoning and Land Use of the subject parcel: RA (Rural Areas) – Vacant/Agricultural/Residential g. What use/zoning will be requested if amendment is approved? RP (Residential Performance District) and M-1 (Light Industrial District) h. Describe, using text and maps as necessary, the existing zoning, Comprehensive Policy Plan designations, and/or approved uses and densities along with other characteristics of the properties that are within 1 mile of subject property: Included are plan graphics showing the current and proposed map changes and the area within 1 mile of the subject change in comprehensive plan land uses. The approximately 122-acre tract is bounded to the west by RA zoned property, to the south by the existing +/- 57 acre Robert E Aylor Middle School, and the north and west by both residentially and industrially zoned property. This application maintains proposed residential and industrial land uses adjacent existing residential and industrial land uses. The residential areas to the north and west are completely developed with the exception of the Tasker Woods project. These existing residential neighborhoods to the north and west generally consist of 1/3 to ¼ acre lots. The Cedar Meadows 55+ community is approximately 500’ southwest of the subject property on White Oak Road. Immediately to the south of the property is the new Robert E. Aylor Middle School. This existing school facility runs along the entire southern boundary of the site. The northern stem of the subject property, which is the subject area for the change request to high density residential, is adjacent existing single-family detached residential land use. The western reach of the subject property is abutting existing M-1 zoned properties to the north and east. This topographically separated area is requesting to remain as light industrial land use. Generally, planned land uses within the 1-mile area in a southerly and easterly direction from the subject property are planned mixed use commercial/office, industrial, rural areas and portions of the Armel Rural Community Center. By rough surface area, within the 1 mile radius of the subject property 47% is existing and fully developed residential and county institutional /park land use; 45% is planned Industrial and mixed use commercial/office; and 8% is east and beyond Route 522 with Rural Areas and portions of the Armel Rural Community Center. A majority of the mixed use and industrial planned areas are currently vacant and existing rural residential land uses partitioned from the subject property by significant environmental and topographic features such as the Wrights Run tributary to the Opequon Creek. See Figures 3,5 and 6. i. Adjoining Property Owners: See Attached List of Adjacent Owners 144 j. Justification of proposed Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment. The recent purchase and development of the new Robert E Aylor Middle School along White Oak Road, outside the UDA, and adjacent the southern boundary of the subject property has changed the dynamics of the Route 277 Triangle in this specific area. The subject property lies immediately to the north of the middle school and abuts Tasker Road. Currently, the Property is located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and immediately adjacent the Urban Development Area (UDA) boundary. Locating the UDA boundary to encompass the +/- 75 acre western portion of the subject property and include the +/- 6.5 acre area north of Tasker road and south of Macedonia Church Road. The requested UDA change would provide neighborhood residential business land use at an appropriate scale and at a highly visible location with existing roads abutting three sides. Additionally, the change would also enable the orderly development of residential development adjacent to existing residential homes and the middle school. Areas near and adjacent to the subject property to the west and north are presently zoned RP and occupied by residential uses. Changing the land use designation to residential ensures a more compatible transition of land uses from low density residential to higher density residential and then to industrial. Placing high-density residential in this location will create an elegant transition from the existing RP properties on the west side of White Oak Road and the Higher intensity Industrial uses planned to the east of the subject property. Furthermore, locating residential adjacent existing schools is good land planning policy as it provides direct access for residents to public open spaces and county resources. Additionally, the proposed Residential to Industrial district boundary would occur in a heavily wooded area with significant topographic relief providing a natural buffer between the residential and industrial uses. The Southern Frederick Land Use Plan currently proposes a trail system and an east -west collector roadway within the subject areas under consideration in this application. This application proposes to maintain the trail connectivity as it will provide future access to the school for the subject property and from the existing residential areas. The collector roadway is proposed to be removed due to the significant topographic challenges in constructing the roadway and the narrowness of land bay remaining between the existing school and existing FBI facility. The eastern portion of the subject site is to remain industrial and access the existing road network. The proposed plan amendment would result in both benefits and impacts to Frederick County. Benefits range from orderly development with existing residential land uses placed adjacent to higher density residential land uses and transitioning to the industrial land uses, focusing planned growth within the targeted urban areas in the county, and placing compatible residential land use adjacent the existing public school property. All new growth and development naturally increases the demands on public services such as schools, transportation, fire and rescue, police and public sanitary sewer and water infrastructure. The location of the subject property and the proposed land uses are situated in a Comprehensive Plan area currently planning for development and investment within the urban region of the county. Co-locating and concentrating development in compact areas promote orderly development and the ability for county services to be provided in a cost-effectively manner. The subject property is adjacent to existing infrastructure and is well positioned to expand facilities and physical infrastructure as necessary and appropriate. The residential components along White Oak Road would require mitigation of pedestrian and vehicular traffic, public 145 safety, as well as water and wastewater infrastructure. The applicant believes that all these facilities are immediately available and will be mitigated during the rezoning process. Public schools would not be negatively impacted should the residential area of this development become age restricted. Other forms of residential development would require mitigating the impacts for schools and county services. The application also proposes to mitigate the fiscal impacts posed by any residential development through the creation of a neighborhood business land bay currently planned as open space and maintaining a significant +/- 47 acre Industrial land use on the eastern portion of the property. Trip Generation Sargent Properties 2023 CPA Existing Residential and Agricultural Uses: +/- 20 ADT Existing Comprehensive Plan Uses: (0.25 FAR) +/- 5,100 ADT Industrial (60 ac): +/- 1,800 ADT Mixed Use Commercial /Industrial (54 ac): +/- 2,900 ADT Park (6 ac): +/- 400 ADT Proposed Comprehensive Plan Uses: +/- 7,500 ADT Residential (69 ac): +/- 2,900 ADT Industrial (47 ac / 0.25 FAR): +/- 1,400 ADT Commercial (6 ac / 0.25 FAR): +/-3,000 ADT Industrial ITE Codes considered: 110 – General Light Industrial 130 – Industrial Park 140 – Manufacturing (Flex Tech) 150 – Warehousing 156 – High Cube Warehousing Commercial ITE Codes considered: 710 – General Office Building 720 – Medical Office Building 851 – Convenience Store Residential ITE Codes considered: 210 – Single-Family Detached Housing 220 - Multi-family Housing (Low-Rise) 251 – Senior Adult Housing - Detached 252 – Senior Adult Housing - Attached 146 147 148 149 INDUSTRIAL PARK UDA LIMITS MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL \ OFFICE INSTITUTIONAL (EXISTING ROBERT E. AYLOR MIDDLE SCHOOL) 00 5000'10000'NORTHCS1000-LANDUSE ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE IN RESPECT OF THE PROJECT. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED OR REPRESENTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR REUSE BY OWNER OR OTHERS ON THE EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT OR ON ANY OTHER PROJECT. ANY REUSE WITHOUT WRITTEN VERIFICATION OR ADAPTATION BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE INTENDED WILL BE AT OWNERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO PENNONI ASSOCIATES; AND OWNER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS PENNONI ASSOCIATES FROM ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, LOSSES AND EXPENSES ARISING OUT OF OR RESULTING THEREFROM. SARGE22001 AS SHOWN KLM 2023-05-26 DLF SHEET APPROVED BY OF1 4 SARGENT PROPERTIES 225 & 255 WHITE OAK ROAD STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA 22655 13282 LERA DRIVE MONTPELIER, VIRGINIA 23192 SARGENT PROPERTIES, LLC EXISTING LANDUSE PLAN DRAWN BY DRAWING SCALE DATE PROJECT PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 150 TRAIL MINOR COLLECTOR UDA LIMITS PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 CS1001-TRANSPORTATION 00 5000'10000' ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE IN RESPECT OF THE PROJECT. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED OR REPRESENTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR REUSE BY OWNER OR OTHERS ON THE EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT OR ON ANY OTHER PROJECT. ANY REUSE WITHOUT WRITTEN VERIFICATION OR ADAPTATION BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE INTENDED WILL BE AT OWNERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO PENNONI ASSOCIATES; AND OWNER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS PENNONI ASSOCIATES FROM ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, LOSSES AND EXPENSES ARISING OUT OF OR RESULTING THEREFROM. SARGE22001 AS SHOWN KLM 2023-05-26 DLF SHEET APPROVED BY OF2 4 SARGENT PROPERTIES 225 & 255 WHITE OAK ROAD STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA 22655 13282 LERA DRIVE MONTPELIER, VIRGINIA 23192 SARGENT PROPERTIES, LLC EXISTING TRANSPORTATION WITH TRAILS PLAN DRAWN BY DRAWING SCALE DATE PROJECTNORTH 151 INDUSTRIAL PARK TO HIGH DENSTIY RESIDENTIAL, 6 U/A NEW UDA LIMITS MIXED USE INDUSTRIAL \ OFFICE TO HIGH DENSTIY RESIDENTIAL, 6 U/A INSTITUTIONAL (EXISTING ROBERT E. AYLOR MIDDLE SCHOOL) APPROXIMATE 1 MILE RADIUS 00 5000'10000'NORTHCS4000-LANDUSE ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE IN RESPECT OF THE PROJECT. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED OR REPRESENTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR REUSE BY OWNER OR OTHERS ON THE EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT OR ON ANY OTHER PROJECT. ANY REUSE WITHOUT WRITTEN VERIFICATION OR ADAPTATION BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE INTENDED WILL BE AT OWNERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO PENNONI ASSOCIATES; AND OWNER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS PENNONI ASSOCIATES FROM ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, LOSSES AND EXPENSES ARISING OUT OF OR RESULTING THEREFROM. SARGE22001 AS SHOWN KLM 2023-05-26 DLF SHEET APPROVED BY OF3 4 SARGENT PROPERTIES 225 & 255 WHITE OAK ROAD STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA 22655 13282 LERA DRIVE MONTPELIER, VIRGINIA 23192 SARGENT PROPERTIES, LLC PROPOSED LANDUSE PLAN DRAWN BY DRAWING SCALE DATE PROJECT PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 152 TRAIL TO REMAIN IN COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MINOR COLLECTOR TO BE REMOVED FROM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN NEW UDA LIMITS 00 5000'10000'NORTHCS4001-TRANSPORTATION ALL DOCUMENTS PREPARED BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES ARE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE IN RESPECT OF THE PROJECT. THEY ARE NOT INTENDED OR REPRESENTED TO BE SUITABLE FOR REUSE BY OWNER OR OTHERS ON THE EXTENSIONS OF THE PROJECT OR ON ANY OTHER PROJECT. ANY REUSE WITHOUT WRITTEN VERIFICATION OR ADAPTATION BY PENNONI ASSOCIATES FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE INTENDED WILL BE AT OWNERS SOLE RISK AND WITHOUT LIABILITY OR LEGAL EXPOSURE TO PENNONI ASSOCIATES; AND OWNER SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD HARMLESS PENNONI ASSOCIATES FROM ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES, LOSSES AND EXPENSES ARISING OUT OF OR RESULTING THEREFROM. SARGE22001 AS SHOWN KLM 2023-05-26 DLF SHEET APPROVED BY OF4 4 SARGENT PROPERTIES 225 & 255 WHITE OAK ROAD STEPHENS CITY, VIRGINIA 22655 13282 LERA DRIVE MONTPELIER, VIRGINIA 23192 SARGENT PROPERTIES, LLC PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION WITH TRAILS PLAN DRAWN BY DRAWING SCALE DATE PROJECT PENNONI ASSOCIATES INC. 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 153 154 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-1345 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 1 of 5 Property Information Property Names Name Explanation Name Historic Sherman, W.S. and C.W., House Current Sherman-Rogers-Sargent House Property Addresses Current - Route 636 County/Independent City(s):Frederick (County) Incorporated Town(s):No Data Zip Code(s):No Data Magisterial District(s):No Data Tax Parcel(s):No Data USGS Quad(s):STEPHENS CITY Property Evaluation Status DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible Additional Property Information Architecture Setting:No Data Acreage:No Data Site Description: No Data Surveyor Assessment: Early 19th century vernacular log dwelling built in 2 sections with original central brick chimney. One of the oldest structures in the area. (Rec Survey 4/92) Surveyor Recommendation:No Data Primary Resource Information Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Single Dwelling NR Resource Type:Building Historic District Status:No Data Date of Construction:Ca 1800 Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:Early National Period (1790 - 1829) Historic Context(s):Domestic Other ID Number:No Data Architectural Style:Other Form:No Data Number of Stories:2.0 Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Main house is log built in 2 sections sharing a large interior brick chimney...(Rec Survey 4/92) Exterior Components Component Component Type Material Material Treatment Windows Sash, Double-Hung Wood 2/2 Chimneys Interior Brick No Data 155 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-1345 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 2 of 5 Roof Gable Metal Standing Seam Structural System and Exterior Treatment Log Wood Siding, Aluminum Porch 1-story, 3-bay Wood Columns, Doric Secondary Resource Information Secondary Resource #1 Resource Category:Domestic Resource Type:Privy Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories:No Data Secondary Resource #2 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Smoke/Meat House Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: One concrete block meathouse; two frame meathouses/sheds with overhangs. (Rec Survey 4/92) Number of Stories:No Data Secondary Resource #3 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Barn Date of Construction:1960Ca Date Source:Site Visit Historic Time Period:The New Dominion (1946 - 1991) Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data 156 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-1345 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 3 of 5 Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories:No Data Secondary Resource #4 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Chicken House/Poultry House Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: Architecture Summary: Frame. Number of Stories:No Data Secondary Resource #5 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Corncrib Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Secondary Resource #6 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Smoke/Meat House Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data 157 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-1345 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 4 of 5 Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories:No Data Secondary Resource #7 Resource Category:Agriculture/Subsistence Resource Type:Smoke/Meat House Date of Construction:Ca Date Source:No Data Historic Time Period:No Data Historic Context(s):Domestic Architectural Style:No Data Form:No Data Condition:No Data Threats to Resource:No Data Cultural Affiliations:No Data Cultural Affiliation Details: No Data Architectural Description: No Data Number of Stories:No Data Historic District Information Historic District Name:No Data Local Historic District Name:No Data Historic District Significance:No Data CRM Events Event Type: DHR Staff: Potentially Eligible DHR ID:034-1345 Staff Name:DHR Event Date:7/12/1994 Staff Comment Project 94-0267-S. Frederick County. Phase I survey. Survey identified 14 structures. All 14 had been previously identified during the Frederick County survey. Two, the Sherman-Rodgers House (34-1345), and the Armel School (34-450) were recommended as potentially eligible. Team concurs. Event Type: Survey:Phase I/Reconnaissance Project Review File Number:No Data Investigator:Kalbian, M. and J.A.H. Perkins Organization/Company:Unknown (DSS) Photographic Media:No Data Survey Date:4/1/1992 Dhr Library Report Number:No Data 158 Virginia Department of Historic Resources DHR ID: 034-1345 Architectural Survey Form Other DHR ID: No Data October 24, 2023 Page: 5 of 5 Project Staff/Notes: No Data Bibliographic Information Bibliography: No Data Property Notes: No Data 159 Virginia Dept. of Historic Resources Legend Architecture Resources Architecture Labels Individual Historic District Properties DHR Easements County Boundaries Title: Architecture Labels Date: 10/24/2023 DISCLAIMER:Records of the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR) have been gathered over many years from a variety of sources and the representation depicted is a cumulative view of field observations over time and may not reflect current ground conditions.The map is for general information purposes and is not intended for engineering, legal or other site-specific uses. Map may contain errors and is provided "as-is". More information is available in the DHR Archives located at DHR’s Richmond office. Notice if AE sites:Locations of archaeological sites may be sensitive the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA), and the Archaeological Resources Protection Act (ARPA) and Code of Virginia §2.2-3705.7 (10). Release of precise locations may threaten archaeological sites and historic resources.160 Property Photographs from VCRIS & Pictometry DHR #034-1345: Sherman-Rogers-Sargent House March 2023 (Pictometry) 161 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Historic Plaque Program Title: Continued discussion on the Historic Plaque Program. Attachments: HRAB11-21-23HistoricPlaqueProgram.pdf 162 Item # 6 Historic Plaque Program Update At the December 2022 as well as February & March 2023 HRAB meetings, members discussed the previously administered Historic Plaque Program, which awarded 33 plaques from 1995 to 2014. The program allowed Frederick County to formally acknowledge the architectural and historic integrity of structures and promote historic preservation. HRAB members expressed interest in continuing the program to award the remaining seven 7 plaques. 5 plaques were awarded at the April Board of Supervisors meeting, leaving 2 plaques. Two letters were mailed out (Hackwood and Long Green) on September 21 in an effort to award the final two plaques. Both recipients are interested in receiving a plaque, and staff is coordinating with both recipients to attend the January 10, 2024 Board of Supervisors meeting to award the plaques. Staff looked into any remaining funding from an original funding award that initially started the historic plaque program. The Director of Planning & Development found that there is no funding in the county budget currently available for the historic plaque program. Any continuation of the program would have to be funded by an outside source, such as a grant. Please find the following attachments for your information: • List of historic properties that have been awarded plaques 163 FREDERICK COUNTY HISTORIC PLAQUES ISSUED Plaque Property Name Owner Location 1 Frederick County Courthouse 5 N Kent Street Winchester 2 Springdale Robert & Susan Claytor 4273 Valley Pike 3 St. Thomas Episcopal Church Town of Middletown 4 Monte Vista Farm William & Barbara Houdershell 8183 Valley Pike 5 Sunrise Margaret Chapin 975 Hollow Road 6 Springdale Flour Mill Louis Brim 124 Springdale Road 7 Hopewell Friends Meeting House Hopewell Meeting Lot 616 Hopewell Road 8 Poor House Fruit Hill Orchard 956 Poorhouse Road 9 Belle Grove Plantation National Trust 336 Bell Grove Road 10 Willow Shade Charles & Nancy Poole 6273 Northwestern Pike 11 Valley View James Hutton 303 Old Baltimore Road 12 Adelphi Mills Harry & Susan Harbaugh 202 Sir Johns Road 13 Springdale Flour Mill Louis Brim Springdale Road 14 Kenilworth Charles Orndoff 2897 Martinsburg Pike 15 Cleridge Martha Clevenger 1649 Old Charlestown Road 16 Lynn-Lodge House Robert Grogg 3641 Apple Pie Ridge Road 17 Rose Hill Farm Glass-Burnie Museum 1985 Jones Road 18 Springdale Thomas Keech 1663 Apple Pie Ridge Rd. 19 Cherry Row David & Jenny Powers 1389 Apple Pie Ridge Rd. 20 Old Stone Church Old Stone Church Off of Green Spring Rd 21 Carter Hall Homer & Doris Alexander 310 Carters Lane 22 Buffalo Marsh David & Elizabeth Moseley 697 Clark Road 23 Sulphur Springs Spa Greig Aitken & Toni Wallace 1160 Jordan Springs Road 24 Homespun R.J. & Mary Turner 949 Cedar Creek Grade 25 Ridings-McClung House Theodore & Bonnie Garrett 1271 Ridings Mill Road 26 Glass-Rinker House Marjorie Copenhaver 2463 Cedar Creek Grade 27 Winter Hill Jacques & Nancy Billmyer 5439 Cedar Creek Grade 28 Hedgebrook Farm Kitty Hockman 690 Shady Elm Road 29 Barrett-Fries House Gregory & Pembroke Hutchinson 2187 Apple Pie Ridge Road 164 30 Glass Rinker Cooper Mill I. William Zartman & Marie Zartman 2431 Cedar Creek Grade 31 White Hall United Methodist Church same 3265 Apple Pie Ridge Road 32 Hites Chapel United Methodist Church same 150 Chapel Road 33 Ireson Springs Farm David & Kathy Holliday 4750 Cedar Creek Grade 34 Chrisman Springs John Lumpkin & Todd Lumpkin 6283 Valley Pike 35 Family Drive-In Catherine F. Dalke 5890 Valley Pike 36 Brightside (Pritchard House)Kernstown Battlefield Association 610 Battle Park Drive 37 Green Spring Mill Martha and William Shabb 617 Green Spring Road 38 Taylor Furnace Farm John Rosenberger 3616 Back Mountain Road 39 Long Green Joe Headley 498 Long Green Lane 40 Hackwood William Britz 534 Redbud Road 165 Historic Resources Advisory Board Agenda Item Detail Meeting Date: November 21, 2023 Agenda Section: Meeting Time Discussion Title: Review results of the survey of the availability of members during regular business hours and discuss potential options for alternative meeting times. Attachments: 166