Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
011-85 Westminister-Canterbury - Backfile
-�� t February 10, 1986 WESTMINSER CANT'ERBURY WINCHESMR Board t istees Mr. Robert W. Watkins President Planning Director George L. Romine County of Frederick Vice President 9 Court Square John G. Goodwin Winchester, VA 22601 Secretary Dear Mr. Watkins: Mrs. Philip B. Glaize Treasurer Enclosed are two sets of final engineering specifications B. Tucker Whitc Jr. on our detention/retention storm water drainage system. Dr. James R ,ack -)n During review by the Planning Commission our preliminary Jacob L. Jo. ;on tt design indicated a 4 continuous outlet control installed William A. Johnston Robert S. Kern at the base of the 18" stand pipe. This outlet size has Rev. David H. Knigh, been revised to reflect a 6" opening. Calculations can William H. Lawrence, Jr. be found on Pages 22-23 of the document. Miss Farley Massey Mrs. H. Delmer Robinson, Jr. I trust you will find the documents as a whole complete Thomas G. Scully Mrs. George H. Smith, Jr. and in tact. If you have any questions, please feel free P.H. Sprenkle to call. Mrs. John Michael Steck, Jr. Mrs. C. Ridgely White Sincerely yours, H. George White, Jr., M.D. T. Fred Allen Project Manager Enclosures TFA:mi P.O. Box 37, 35 E. Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601, Telephone (703) 665-0156 Toll Free in Virginia 1-800-492-9463 NARRATIVE Westminster Canterbury of Winchester Comm. No. 82058 Project Description The purpose of this project is the constrution of a new long-term life care facility. The site of approximately 44 acres is located off of U.S. Rt. 522 on Frederick Mall Drive. The construction will consist of three interconnected buildings, loop road and resident and staff parking. Approximately 15 acres will be disturbed during construction. Existing Site Conditions The site has irregular topography with elevations ranging from a high of 842 to a low of about 775. A majority of the site is forested with thick hardwoods. The remaining areas are grass covered with occasional isolated brushy areas within the grassy areas. Numerous rock outcrops occur in three well-defined belts that cross theJ:property in a northeasterly direction. These belts are wooded and are topographically higher than the cleared, grassy areas on either side. The site is divided into three drainage areas which eventually merge to empty into a small stream near U.S. Rt. 522. Adjacent Property Frederick Mall Subdivision borders the Subdivision borders the site to the East, to the South and private lots on Old Fort Soils site to the North, land of the Darlington Clearbrook Woolen Company borders the site Road borders the site to the West. Two general soil horizons and one major rock unit exist over the building area. Topsoil generally blankets the entire site including the proposed access roads and parking areas. The topsoil thickness averages four to eight inches and is thicker in the forested areas except when rock outcrops. The topsoil is basically a low plastic silt with a trace of clay and organics. The bedrock surface is very irregular as a result of differential weathering. The bedrock is predominantly a hard gray limestone of the Conococheague Foundation. Interestingly enough, no groundwater was encountered during soil testing proceedings. The soils engineer indicates that there can be dramatic fluctuations in the groundwater table that are directly related to the hydrological cycles and can occur rather rapidly. He has observed a groundwater rise in the Winchester area of approximately four to ten inches within 24 hours after a four inch rainfall. Critical Erosion Areas There are no critical erosion areas presently. However, there is concern that concentrated runoff from the storm drainage system could pose problems for areas offsite which lie below the project and along the natural Swale which carries runoff from the site. For this reason, a retention/detention basin has been designed to reduce runoff from the project to a point at which there will actually be less water leaving the site after development than there was before development. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Unless otherwise indicated, all vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control measures shall be constructed and maintained according to minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Structural Practices 1. Temporary Gravel Construction Entrance 2. Construction Road Stabilization 3. Silt Fence 4. Storm Drain Inlet Protection 5. Outlet Protection 6. Rip -rap 7. Dust Control 8. Retention/Detention Basin with Sediment Settling Area Vegetative Practices 1. Topsoiling 2. Permanent Seeding 3. Tree Preservation and Protection Management Strategies 1. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operation may begin and end as quickly as possible. 2. The sediment trapping measures shall be installed as a first step in grading. 3. Permanent seeding shall follow finish grading as immediately as possible. See plan for seed mixture. 4. Areas that will not be disturbed shall be flagged clearly. >_ 5. The contractor shall be responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion and sediment control measures. 0 Stormwater Management Calculation of stormwater runoff before and after development indicates that there will be an increase in peak runoff in the major natural channel leaving the site as a result of the development (see attached calculation, page 18). State and local criteria require pre -development runoff from a 10-year storm not be exceeded after construction. This concern, plus the additional request from local authorities to retain runoff from a 5-year storm, led to the design of a retention/detention basin. The most critical situation, with respect to occurrence of a 5-year storm and a 10-year storm drainage calculations (pages 19-31) explain the storm overflow spillway. Maintenance basin volume, would be the back to back. Review of the design of the basin and the 100-year All erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked weekly and after each significant rainfall according to recommendations of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Sediment accumulation in the "Settling" portion of the retention/detention basin shall be monitored weekly and after each rainfall of 1 inch or more in a 24-hour period. Sediment shall be removed from the basin as required to maintain an elevation difference of at least 1.5 feet between the 6 inch outlet opening and the level of sediment accumulation in the basin's trapping area. • I* 1980 I* I 3. Time of Concentration (TC) = 15 min. (given) 4. Determine Rainfall Intensity Factor (i) (i) = 4.9 in/hr - (from Plate 5-3) 5. Q = C(i)(A) Q = .43(4.9)(80) = 168.56 cfs Table 5-2 VALUES OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (C) FOR RATIONAL FORMULA Land use Business: Downtown areas Neighborhood areas Residential: Single-family areas Multi units, detached Multi units, attached Suburban Industrial: Light areas Heavy areas Parks, cemeteries Playgrounds Railroad yard areas Unimproved areas Streets: Asphaltic Concrete Brick Drives and walks Roofs C 0.70-0.95 0.50-0.70 0.30-0.50 0.40-0.60 0.60-0.75 0.25-0.40 0.50-0.80 0.60-0.90 0.10-0.25 0.20-0.35 0.20-0.40 0.10-0.30 0.70-0.95 0.80-0.95 0.70-0.85 0.75-0.85 0.75-0.95 Land use Lawns: Sandy soil, flat, 2% Sandy soil, average, 2-7% Sandy soil, steep, 7% Heavy soil, flat, 2% Heavy soil, average, 2-7% Heavy soil, steep, 7 % Agricultural land: Bare packed soil Smooth Rough' Cultivated rows Heavy soil no crop Heavy soil with crop Sandy soil no crop Sandy soil with crop Pasture Heavy soil Sandy soil Woodlands C 0.05-0.10 0.10-0.15 0.15-0.20 0.13-0.17 0.18-0.22 0.25-0.35 0.30-0.60 0.20-0.50 0.30-0.60 0.20-0.50 0.20-0.40 0.10-0.25 0.15-0.45 0.05-0.25 0.05-0.25 Note: The designer must use judgement to select the appropriate C value within the range. Generally, larger areas with permeable soils, flat slopes and dense vegetation should have lowest (C) values. Smaller areas with dense soils, moderate to steep slopes, and sparce vegetation should be assigned highest (C) values. Source: American Society of Civil Engineers V-5 1980 I * I H (feet) — 500 Tc (min.) 200 100 100 L (feet) 10000 Exa�P 50 1 e - 50 5000 0 Note: u Use nomograph Tc for natural basins o y, with well defined channels, for aoverland flow on bare earth, and a, for mowed grass roadside channels. o +, ° v 10 v10 For overland flow, grassed surfaces, e 1000 e 0� multiply T. by 2. E ~ Y X For overland flow, concrete or 500 5 asphalt surfaces, multiply Tc'by 0.4. 5 0 L For concrete channels, multiply Tc a v by02 s 1 100 1 - ' 1 TIME OF CONCENTRATION OF. SMALL DRAINAGE BASINS Source: VDH&T Plate 5-.2 V-7 198 10 I RAINFALL FREQUENCY -INTENSITY -DURATION CHART RICHMOND, VA. 20.0 15.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 RPrUr 4.0 pPh �o Sp FdrvJ L 2.0 �S o Ip x v I iS n 1.0 v 0.8 - 0.6 Y N v 0.4 N C b 0.2 0.1 0.08 0.06 0..04 0.02 3 1 4 5 1�0 15 2 3 40 S 60 Hours Minutes Duration ource: VDH&T riate 5-4 V-9 lt1 "ser SZ8 � W 1 � � Z � �- a �� f o� 00 t 1 1 I - s• xifi - � � • +� r - • f s 0 n. , SECSshererti,-Franklin, Crawford, ShafMer Architeowre/Eng Ineering/Planningg q,14 Wesl Kirk Avenue: Roanoke: Vlrgmia 24011• . - .: . • • • I i ' L q_......... ..._...... ......._......._....._---- ..----- ------ -_-- --- Mp ��;Shererlr Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture/Engineermg/Plann mgg 14 rWl�� 14WestK�rkAvenue floanOke Virgm�a241)11 �� r .. t • •- ArJ, a�411 !. IWIM [o 1 J• Mk'Mriir�■.:b �' 7W7,111 it i IIII'M � ii►.._.� __ �:.,,, r;,, 0 SECSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaflner Archilecture: Engmeeting, Plemm�g . 1 0 14 West Knk Avenue. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ®® • • I � / • • � 'c A 0 SFCS -4 DRW BY CKD BY ATE COMM NO ,D� , s.. ( ( , ( 1 , - .. t ....:...:..:-.:. i , i .:.. .. j# , I { ( jj f _ _ i y. , h y .... - ..-..;. I 0 e �J SECSSherert:, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Arc hilepture/Engineering/Planning 14 West Kirk Avenug� Roanoke Virginia 24017 ; �® l w • �/ 1 ! • 0 1 �J _.. ._._ _._..._....... ........... ell SFCS -4 DRW BY _ -D By t GATE 7 O�D� ------------- _f L0 i.. Pat �,W� .. , _..___ _.-- _ -_ , ,. : .._..____----__ _ _..__.............__.._ _ : E -------------- , t E , i !shy to: r E� EII il , , WIS. ,. -. , ......:....: . :..:...:....: : , , _.... .. I. t . s . 1 , { .........:...... ll i i E -.___. _____ - ------- --------- _____.. tlp� " fief"; o; r� ` d, 3�7 , 3 1 i z SECSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture: Eng)neenng, Planng 14 Wegt Kirk Avenue,.Hoanoke, inVug,ma 24011 � � � , ' • • l 4 _ SFCS STORMWATER COMPUTATIONS ROUTE 99DJ. COUNTY DISTRICT DESCRIPTION SHEET. -OF FROM TO AREA DRAIN. 'Wi RUN- OFF COEF. CA i INLET TIME RAIN FALL RUNOFF, q INVERT ELEVATIONS Oct:, i- LENGTH SLOPE DIA. C PA- CITY VEL. FLOW TIME RE.WA.RKS POINT POINT ACRES C INCRE-. MENT' ACCUM- ULATED. MIN- UTES IN./HR - C.F.S. ; UPPER END LOWER END FT. IN. CF.S. F.P,3. SEC. �, 4 t7 • x • I C71- I 2 .. 12 . -12 2 ,q 5.2 q . �5 2 l �. 5 I- 1 D 1-2 0.17 . & Z .10 "27 r7.-v" 1 :�>.7 2�,,5 21,2. cr I ,-2:7 0,70 7.7 i>I-12 C71-5 o, I ,(A- ,09 .(.1 li r,,'?>S lot 4.3 : 25,6. 1 ?70- r,-). ' I 21,0112 29 1--"t? c) P-1-4- 0.90 ,bb ,&10 1.22` 1.3D (/,-�4 &,F 10 &.9 6,C2 GI.0 1 1. 1? q,r,2 q, -1.1-7 175 1 o,60 1,0 2 24- 17,0 25, .5 .c) 32 22 (a,57 y.24- 1 1- aDtAH.2 D,, q ,rb'Z .4-02 7, I 2.q 1.7.0 I r,-7. Ieoo 1.0 1 r:) (a 4--7 5 c - ®1'�I ,42 5, 6? -7, D 2, 5 15.E q ,4h 110 'S.2q 1 5.2 124 Ni > 5 9 M i t�1, L15� �.� 7,2 ► . SDt��4-1 >✓Ni1�-xf1 ._:: _.. .�.. 1.1� 114 67 11.4 .-7, D-7 tea." - 173 1.0 24 'Z0 & 4 27 7. 1.7D 7. �9 6, Z4r;,, 0,57 'Zg- I 5,_1 4& 13,4� DI-7 -3 Cp 5D d-3 �i- (� 1..14 •-- 2.0 ---- ,I to �--- I . I 1 87 q 1.(P� 2,74- 5,2(. �, 7. i �.a t;;,,•7 �.`7 11,4 Ir2,9 13,Q It.S 10.0 13,10 Io,(no (A i© I I 290 Z,oq 1, 17 1 Z+ 2 Z. 1, + I AJ 5 (P7 DI-10 p,,,9 40 .357 -.1 '(0.35 -7.0 . l 2f j .r-.)50 Z.F7 250 5+ S6,- I';�o ICo ICo 67& �>� -I-q- - --' -- ---- 5.35 '576 �. 33� '78�,� 150 0,-65 �� �. 5, 32 , 0. I & Kirx Ro�klokt.,YIrqi6j9?4Oil, SFCS -4 � r V- DRWW BY CKD BY OATE COMM NO 51�1 ,05 1! 11 1* FV tAT SFCSSherer ' M Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture/Engineering/Planning 14 West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia COMM No its: I * f V 1 1 l-4 ?rertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner flecture/�gineedng/Plannnp Ie54 Kirk AvenueRoanoke 1{Irg!ma 24044 f ., ® •� � � I • � 2 Ul SFCS -4 DRW BY CKD BY COMM NO ,D� ►emu '► O�j Z. j",.. Iz 1 42 , Cvl:2 l goo. 3HR , 72, I✓i"� - I In SMILE SFCSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, 5h�ffner w ArchiteCture/Engineedng/planning 14yVestKukAvenue Roanoke Vitgfn1a24071 ��'!'.® • J � •� • iY P-4 , - r 15�1 ------------- C,2 - Ld 0 -r2jl 22, SFCS 14 Wesl Kirk A!enuj,,, 78G is ___. I.... _w__. _...__-_ ------- _:.� pip ,2j: 0 --rP, I * 10 10 G� 2� ORW BY CKD By DATE COMM NO Go I SFCS -4 10 ion! 2 tip 12.E 000 i L+�� ?�ahererfz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner �7 "Areh4olwe*rl neeiing/Planning . *�'ys{ �44WealKirk/�venge RoNanoke Vlrglmaz4017, s ��li�� , + •. _. _ 10 i P �- l.>`..I p i. '.. I � IWJ i - i l o_ i2. afi ltlea DPI - +� �� pLJi . �2©` AIQ . ! . :.: :.:.:.:.. q. I I U� cafps I ,INs6' m N�7THr= WO 5-r 60Nprr{gW1 13�161t�l= L.,rZEA�, - , - S r r�LJ9aUT " 4 i i ' -,- _.._..___._-..._.._._.__ ------ I I ._ __._.- 2 5 . " I - i , ;. ,2e> :. .. .. , i 3 42 . 17_ 4s NG? 29. 5 -7,6 F,-+ 3,3:I�,� I , 24- 29 91 �2,24 .. :1 M .015. 1 s Z �► 2� 2 i ` �.� � 3� _ 2 r2`� , I �. o . - (�.alL � A4 SFCSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner ArchiteOture/Engini;ering/plan iing 14 Wesl Kirk Avenue, Roiindke Vggima24011 .. • e / r DRW BY CKD ©Y DATE� COMM NO ,o� 10 ��, S�i�p�rert. �ran�CltrY, CtaWtgrd, $haN erg .Y Archit¢5tui¢/Ed�me@iing/RfanA�n'gg` ,_Q �}ny r���R��Hc. �tnv�gt�4:rkRver�ue�Floenake Vlr�l�nta�4g1. e � � I r 7Arr ra�r,�"u+, r ,�•�r � 10 I N., Y" SShi�e'rft, Franklin, CraWford,-,Shaffner , !,16tiftec6o/Endin-ee Aript06nino�, I I Wpat Kirk Avepre-. floanoke. VIrginla 24011 - CO0MM NO ®� -5 , P.�4 0 5 3.6C 3.4C 2.6C 2.40 0 0.2 slope of upstream face l `t 1 1.4 1.6 1.8 2. N h - -- � 0.4. U.b U.6 h L GN N Ll P, a SFCS--4 KIb 1.0 .�.�.� OFW BY CKO BY OAT nCOMM NO `i 6 0 Ll Nwin �' . � Sh�re,�tz, Franklin; Crawford, �tiaffner "`� . ArchIle Clure/ 8ngIneennd/Plarinlnp: eSt KI1kAvenue H anOkB Vu role 24019i ' • s • COMM• 10 SFCS -4 DRw [w CKO BY DATE COMM NO ,05 Bf�afiner;':, 107b6{P 4^}' �' i • •• / • • IC j ORW BI CKD BY DAT COMM NO SFCS -4 05 � 0 m 0 1<o% z_-r-11"efaf I'll, s Flt ._... ... ..' . : p�40 :off SSE (� 451Aa�.V ,2 (o NARRATTVF Westminster Canterbury of Winchester Comm. No. 82058 Project Description The purpose of this project is the constrution of a new long-term life care facility. The site of approximately 44 acres is located off of U.S. Rt. 522 on Frederick Mall Drive. The construction will consist of three interconnected buildings, loop road and resident and staff parking. Approximately 15 acres will be disturbed during construction. Existing Site Conditions The site has irregular topography with elevations ranging from a high of 842 to a low of about 775. A majority of the site is forested with thick hardwoods. The remaining areas are grass covered with occasional isolated brushy areas within the grassy areas. Numerous rock outcrops occur in three well-defined belts that cross the property in a northeasterly direction. These belts are wooded and are topographically higher than the cleared, grassy areas on either side. The site is divided into three drainage areas which eventually merge to empty into a small stream near U.S. Rt. 522. Adjacent Property Frederick Mall Subdivision borders the site to the North, land of the Darlington Subdivision borders the site to the East, Clearbrook Woolen Company borders the site to the South and private lots on Old Fort Road borders the site to the West. Soils Two general soil horizons and one major rock unit exist over the building area. Topsoil generally blankets the entire site including the proposed access roads and parking areas. The topsoil thickness averages four to eight inches and is thicker in the forested areas except when rock outcrops. The topsoil is basically a low plastic silt with a trace of clay and organics. The bedrock surface is very irregular as a result of differential weathering. The bedrock is predominantly a hard gray limestone of the Conococheague Foundation. Interestingly enough, no groundwater was encountered during soil testing proceedings. The soils engineer indicates that there can be dramatic fluctuations in the groundwater table that are directly related to the hydrological cycles and can occur rather rapidly. He has observed a groundwater rise in the Winchester area of approximately four to ten inches within 24 hours after a four inch rainfall. Critical Erosion Areas There are no critical erosion areas presently. However, there is concern that concentrated runoff from the storm drainage system could pose problems for areas offsite which lie below the project and along the natural swale which carries runoff from the site. For this reason, a retention/detention basin has been designed to reduce runoff from the project to a point at which there will actually be less water leaving the site after development than there was before development. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Unless otherwise indicated, all vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control measures shall be constructed and maintained according to minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Structural Practices 1. Temporary Gravel Construction Entrance 2. Construction Road Stabilization 3. Silt Fence 4. Storm Drain Inlet Protection 5. Outlet Protection 6. Rip -rap 7. Dust Control 8. Retention/Detention Basin with Sediment Settling Area Vegetative Practices 1. Topsoiling 2. Permanent Seeding 3. Tree Preservation and Protection Management Strategies 1. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operation may begin and end as quickly as possible. 2. The sediment trapping measures shall be installed as a first step in grading. 3. Permanent seeding shall follow finish grading as immediately as possible. See plan for seed mixture. 4. Areas that will not be disturbed shall be flagged clearly. 5. The contractor shall be responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion and sediment control measures. Stormwater Management Calculation of stormwater runoff before and after development indicates that there will be an increase in peak runoff in the major natural channel leaving the site as a result of the development (see attached calculation, page 18). State and local criteria require pre -development runoff from a 10-year storm not be exceeded after construction. This concern, plus the additional request from local authorities to retain runoff from a 5-year storm, led to the design of a retention/detention basin. The most critical situation, with respect to occurrence of a 5-year storm and a 10-year storm drainage calculations (pages 19-31) explain the storm overflow spillway. Maintenance basin volume, would be the back to back. Review of the design of the basin and the 100-year All erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked weekly and after each significant rainfall according to recommendations of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Sediment accumulation in the "Settling" portion of the retention/detention basin shall be monitored weekly and after each rainfall of 1 inch or more in a 24-hour period. Sediment shall be removed from the basin as required to maintain an elevation difference of at least 1.5 feet between the 6 inch outlet opening and the level of sediment accumulation in the basin's trapping area. W 3. Time of Concentration (TC) = 15 min. (given) • Ok 4. Determine Rainfall Intensity Factor (i) (i) = 4.9 in/hr - (from Plate 5-3) 5. Q = C(i)(A) Q = .43(4.9)(80) = 168.56 cfs Table 5-2 VALUES OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (C) FOR RATIONAL FORMULA Land use C Business: Downtown areas 0.70-0.95 Neighborhood areas 0.50-0.70 Residential: Single-family areas 0.30-0.50 Multi units, detached 0.40-0.60 Multi units, attached 0.60-0.75 Suburban 0.25-0.40 Industrial: Light areas 0.50-0.80 Heavy areas 0.60-0.90 Parks, cemeteries 0.10-0.25 Playgrounds 0.20-0.35 Railroad yard areas 0.20-0.40 Unimproved areas 0.10-0.30 Streets: Asphaltic 0.70-0.95 Concrete 0.80-0.95 Brick 0.70-0.85 Drives and walks 0.75-0.85 Roofs 0.75-0.95 Land use Lawns: Sandy soil, flat, 2% Sandy soil, average, 2-7% Sandy soil, steep, 7% Heavy soil, flat, 2% Heavy soil, average, 2-7% Heavy soil, steep, 7 % Agricultural land: Bare packed soil Smooth Rough' Cultivated rows Heavy soil no crop Heavy soil with crop Sandy soil no crop Sandy soil with crop Pasture Heavy soil Sandy soil Woodlands C 0.05-0.10 0.10-0.15 0.15-0.20 0.13-0.17 0.18-0.22 0.25-0.35 0.30-0.60 0.20-0.50 0.30-0.60 0.20-0.50 0.20-0.40 0.10-0.25 0.15-0.45 0.05-0.25 0.05-0.25 Note: The designer must use judgement to select the appropriate C value within the range. Generally, larger areas with permeable 'soils, flat slopes and dense vegetation should have lowest (C) values. Smaller areas with dense soils, moderate to steep slopes, and sparce vegetation should be assigned highest (C) values. Source: American Society of Civil Engineers V-5 4 H (feet) — 500 100 L (feet) 10000 �xa'ap) 41 e - 50 5000 o _ a, °J Note: ~ Q Use nomograph Tc for natural basins 4-" 41 with well defined channels, for aoverland flow on bare earth, and for mowed grass roadside channels. C' E 10 For overland flow, grassed surfaces, E 1000 Y multiply T. by 2. E N 0 For overland flow, concrete or X 500 14- 5 asphalt surfaces, multiply Tc *by 0.4. O s For concrete channels, multiply Tc by 0.2. v 100 1 - " TIME OF CONCENTRATION OF. SMALL DRAINAGE BASINS Tc (min.) "— 200 100 50 E 10 H r: L 1 Source: VDH&T Plate 5-2 V-7 1980 WN 10 RAINFALL FREQUENCY -INTENSITY -DURATION CHART RICHMOND, VA. 20.0 15.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 RP�Vr 4.0 p Phi - _O so dh J 2.0 �S o x Ip I S a 1.0 v 2 u 0.8 c - o.6 N v 0.4 c ro 0.2 0.1 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.025 3 4 1�0 15 2 3 40 5 60 Hours Minutes Duration Source: VDH&T V-9 riate 5-4 0 I • • NEW iiiiill S�CSShererfz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner ArehlleOture/Engineering/Plknnln9g 14 W." Kek Avenue Roahoka,, Virpinie 2401. • . : U IWO _.._--_-__.-_ j oll DFW By CKD BY DATE COMM NO Z/ G I 2� 82v5Fa ----------- ---------- 0) Sherertz; Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner .sF!C$ Aichitecttire/Eniineering/planning 14 West Kirk Avenue. Roanoke, Virginia 24011 ®® ' • ' ' •' 850 STRE fag M% x L !o Co v v � v � i if Zoo .� a. UP p�F>F:;:: IN ' P r 1TL� J 7 �N'u"��1�'s Onw ur CKO Or OA(E COMM NO y{ �20� - I n--"- i.n :UO l SECSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Arch aecturwEng meenngrPiammng 74 West Kirk Avenue. Roanoke. Vugmw 24011 ®® • s / • � I � n IAli-, ) ') mr- ------------- .......... fA 6 6 A Zhaf Iner toll ORW BY CKO 13Y ATE COMM NO r-M , , , 1"01"_�-- + " f I + j: -.,... M . b i W. ---- -- - - - i i i } ..:...:... t :....:.....:... ....:. + �S f ' G i � s ...:....:.. . { , E , _. 9 , i �►� - ... Y i ------------- , i : 10 t ... i , , i.. < ......:... i ,...i. , SFOO. Sherertf,.Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Archnecture/Eng ineen ngMann ing 14 West Knk Avenue, Roanoke, Vuginia 24011 � . o . i i � � • /. • i -- rl m t , 1 i ii t , 4-7 4-1 .__.:. f _ ___-.___-..:._. , , , SECS-Sherertz Franklin Crawford, Shaffner A rchdecturerEng mee rmylPlan n ing 14 West Kirk Avenue, Roaegke, Vtrymia 24011 ` � . � ® •' . � • ~ • A 1 w U7 ■,. SFCSShererti, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture. Engineering: Planning - 14 West Kirk Avenue. Roanoke. Vuguna 24011 �. i ® ,• r � •r •� 71 $���: S6rert2,'Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Arcndeclurn,Engme� ingrplannmg ,- 14 West Kirk Avanuc, Roanokce, Vugmia 24011 i Emi=p-I� • I (zf__r__q STORMWATER COMPUTAT100 ROUTE &,R 0J. • G# V�I `'"' COUN I Y U15 1 fill:I ii DESCRIPTION SHEET I'Z - O F FROM POINT TO POINT AREA DRAIN. IWI RUN- OFF COEF. CA i INLET TIME RAIN FALL RUNOFFi Q I INVERT ELEVATIONS LENGTH SLOPE DIA. CJ`PA- CITY VEL. FLOW TIME REJVKRKS SECt �NII . L ACRES C INCRE-. MENT' ACCUM- ULATED. MIN- UTES IN. .F.S. ; C. UPPER END LOWER END FT. -F IN, C-F.9. F.P.S. h - X• I D I 1 2 12 .412 . I 2.91 2 ,9 2(,. 9c:-2 I.o 2 52 44:ram 'ZI 1- 1 ! -� 0.17 . (v2 .ion° . �.� 7. 3.7 2� ,3 2�. I �� 0+70 ,-7 o �, 51� C)1-/2' _ DI- a 1 tr ,y 1�� r�1 li �.� ,0 Zr. ?5 : 25,8. i �. 'Z'%a �, �� 2.0 '92Z �� 1- �I-4 1.4- SDNI - I oqo o, Irp ,�;3 r�i I .o7L 1.22` 1.3O �1,3q. &.87 ,a &.`� S, �l.p I ,o q,� °I, "7. i7 I75 I� 0,g0 i, 2 24 17.0 Z5, �.5 � - 22 7.2 - CAI- aDtAH-2 0,° � I F; Z- .4.02 Ai�e2 � 7. I 2,q I`71 p I �.4.o I (no 1.0 1 47 r7. 57 SD 1 -2 SDI�1� - 1 �- --- r4�2 5, a7 70 2, 5 ' 15 9. 1 5 110 5.29 1 � 1 8.2 1� r�.7 1/24 NI 1 > 5 9 M ! NJ, �.� 7.2 ► . SptAH- i DMH-Xr1 ._ ._... ._.. I .`lo 1.7o 114 7.( 9 6;7 Q-(0 1 1.4 11, 2 `7,v`7 r,,;,,s+ rp.'-�4 3.{b5 I73 Z45 1.0 D:57 -Z 24- 20 1 ;-5 &.4 . ( 27 4& 7 (P9 IF,49 I�{-S Ili -mil DI DI-IcP .1..14 O,�fl .7p ��Q .761b I, I I .357 ,-7aE L1 S 1►(p3 *Z,-74- -5. 1 �,�(. i�,c; tv.V1 '60>6 -I. I -1 I. 7,o rD -7.0 �.7 Ca,`7 I IA Iq-2 21.1 i�,v 13,p lo.5✓ lao ' Co.S l�- k� (o,(ov Ia Io �o,(p 3,a5 lob I I 5p 'Z19 105 I,� 1 Z,o9 o,5o 1. 17 2,eeZ ►� I 24- 'Z '24 �; 2 17 21 �.� (o,O -7.1 I 4 5,2 5, 5 G, (P7 1� 1- l p 4- o� ►(- . 5 �3� -0� C. .43 Z. 7 . 250 1554 .��• I iC� 1 Co 7 5D fl-4 -� --- -- ---- 5.38 8,75 T �.� 3 .9 ISo 0,3� 5.5 32 �I PP. ►� L L ►IIU, -- ----- - - ------------------ , A skjC', !Y nuq. Rqanae. vjlg,nia 1, �®� X CO M 0 M SECSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner, Architecture Engmeenng; Planning. - � 14 West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 �® , M • , • ter SECSSherertz Franklin, Crawtgr�, Shattner Architecture/Engineering/Plenniny i�r M West Ktrk Avenue Roanoke, Wrgtn�a 24011DRW BY, .COMMe 4 i �U ,4 i. SECSSherertt, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture/Engineering/planningg "- 14 West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke,VGgmia 240111 p a,/ o, Lo r M e, �17 17 DRW BY CKD BY 'DATE COMM NO 1 _2:- g2065 lz 105 SFCS -4 IH 14 -------------- .-.- W.G, 0 1 rV- Ie? DRW BY CKD BY L----F-COMM NO 8 ij2 o ,D,� I SFCSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture/Engineering/Planning lA West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke Vugmla 24011; O' BY I ® ■ . , '-COMM� ,./r / i QGW � P, p'Q-r?'Pg p 64uIr�. tr2 17 4, '!5: - - ---------- x Sherertz, Fianklin, Crawford, Shaffner SFCS Architecture/Engineeling/Planiriing ' ' '.' 4� � 1�1.;��' 74 West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 24011 a �® •, , w' • • • SECSSherertz Franklin. Crawford, Shaffner Archilecture/Engineiaring/PlanninlI a 14 West Kirk Avenue. Roanoke. Nrginia 24071 � ./ ® ,I � . / • I • I Y ------- ---- ----------- Z22 ------ --- - - ----- ----------- k. LA L VP►~-,- W A-,,I�.2- DeTr4 .14441 uu Z7f 2/2-1 P 5 ffH = (.a DRW BY CKD BY DAT COMM NO I I 1 02 0 L SFCS -4 , pr__ 0 Sherert4 Franklin, SECS ACrawbrd, Shaffner rchitectureXngineerinWPrannin6 7 i - 14 West Kirk Avenue. Roanoke: Virginia 24011; ,, DRVY 0 Ll �rIA"Franklin,'Crawford, Shaffner ct6re/Engtgeering/(Manning " ' " :1i. 1 Kirk Avenue Roanoke,, Virginia 2401f .. - . i.: _. 13o 1 • W X 000 SECSSherertz, Frariklin,yCraw6d, Shaffner ; Architectu re/Eng meeri rtg/Plano mt� .� 14 West Kirk Avenue' Roanoke VGginla 24011 , -y. • mi • . • • I � �2 , II { I rt Cz- I 1, �.5r.�l � Ill , = 4� `I"{ t�1 �� E LC�1, D, l� OfZ'j"a Cn�i� I NJ -IL : 14 �; ={ .. _...___.__. _ __ _ __.._ ___...____. VW a plj�t�N . 4. �- ; 5T 69wpr-rjofJ ;_........., ._.__. rj.'- t.. E..!.C. G�. { { • �.U.t�i'.. (� LD E P 10 0'.. t -77,6,r7 3•{7 I.7,� � .: � 2'Z " �- .78•�-.� .. .: �.1� .:. 17 Cam:. 7 �>,,z I 77 ,- �3,33 2,11 " i..�_ 'z; z ; : ;.. I 272boo:..... 5 • . I ; 457 ,o rJ DRW BY CHD BY DAT COMM NO SFCS -4 Q5, 1 r { I : s-� -� Flo � r , ► rl : I;J b I OQ D' ► li0 F ; ► _ ' A•� C2------------------------------ c>n 1, ► .... , , , { f i } SFCSSheierfz,,ranklid.:, awtord, Shaf�neri3 . IArahitectuie/Fii Mierih A5nninggj 14 West Kirk qv@nue, Raangke, ViFgmia 240t C; ih .. , ; , .COMM• 1-� y FCS'. Sherertz, Franktin,'Craitords $haffn�P Arch itecture/Eng meeri ng/Planningg a }' 14 West Kirk Avenue Roanoke rymia 24011 s I i In, SECS Sherertz, FranklCrawford, f�a�fner 4 f Architecture/Engmeeriny/Plangin' r,+ 14 W@St Kirk,.-Avenue�,f<iOapgJc@� V11gIDIa 2Adtl i s'�" . . ;�� „a SI( s I )pe Of upstream face 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2. h o 0.2 0.4. 0.6 0.8 1 A A .... ....... . DRW BY CKD BY 0 COMM NO F6 5 5.,0 SFCS--4 v .She.. r' Fr 4eriin,'Crawford, Shaffner ArcpdeCtue/�ngirieering/Plangdg West KirJc Avenue Rc9noke Vlrgif�la 2401f ifr � 7i [7 r+ i• � rwl—�— w I t� c 4 C- C�-) r CKD BY OMM NO 3FC5'4 i ssuNAi.-�'�.I�.-fir?- co�ltt-11ra.l - ; r s { . __.- __.___. _.._.__ ._... DRW EiY CKD DV DAT COMM NO SFCS -4 �r SFGS�' Shece .a ' tn; o Archrtlur�lErt�i�ACrip�/IpRndr �14We5tKirnA4 �e.�Qai a-Vr Igt�t�4�YY'` � ®; �, • � � 1 ��� � y,!•�I�-`�"'�` � . LEI'-11�. ,�' ��" �.�. � 5���' ; 4.5 tr + if r^ , -------------- c-N415 _...... ..._..... gyp. ,._.. :_.�� s i r t r r 1 t t -�.1.95_ r 1[x1 =7 -_� - _ _.r a_�..» »___ _ _ -. t �/ /. r , - - ----------- rT 't DRW By CND BY DAT COMM NO SFCS -4 . . ..... ..... . . . ........ lz --- LXI OR CKD BY DATIlb5l COMM NO SFCS -4 K , G, l�H eo:,21eiz DRW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO 0 SFCS -4 ORW PV CKD BY GATE COMM NO gzoG�� SFCS -4 .:...:...:.. ..... ............... ......:. 1 ......:...:..:. �. ...:. i .�.. .. a ' ..:...:....: .. . .:.:.:..... I { _:....._.. __ ...:..._....€.....5 :...:...:....:. .........s.. ORW BY CKO BY DATE COMM NO SFCS -4 .< DRW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO SFCS -4 SECSSherertz. Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner A Mh,teLture: Eng meenng: Planmrig _ .14 West NrtR Avenue. Roanoke. Virginia 24011 MR. • ' � • 1 •I SFCS -4 SFCSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture Engmeenng,Plannmg 14 West Kirk Avenue. Ruaauku. Vey,q,a 24011 �® � •MMIYMVIOM SECS STORMWATER COMPUTATIONS ROUTE COUNTY DESCRIPTION PROD. W,G, w1I44 �4alTFIrz DISTRICT. SHEET OF AREA RUN- OFF INLET CA i TIME I RAIN FALL RUNOFF, q INVERTK'CAPA E-EVATIONS LENGTH CITY VEL. FLOWDRAIN. TIMEFROM TO POINT IWO ACRES COEF. C INCRE-. ACCUM- MENT' ULATED. MIN- UTES .C.F.S. ; `+ UPPER LOWER END END FT.CF.S. F.P.S. SEC. REJMkRKSM �e- �mloPOINT .8� . o,4izo.+12 5,0 I Z.i 127,�i 2C'`� q5' O, F7 ,6�. o, l oS o.sl 7 5, �5 �.% 2(0, `b 25.q 127 0,7 ' I 4 2 a S, 5 r--.>I-�2_ DI- D11+ ,b7 0,094 1! 5.'35 -7,a : 4.5 : ZS,lo. I I: r-2 Z70 ; 512-:;, 6.3>5 70 �j, 5 I I.O q,(o 175 O.g 2-�' I �,� fL Cam. ov`v' � I - � 0.15 . �{ �.07� I'3o G•$°� �,q 9.0.. 9.5 3.7� lq� 2.4 Z�"- �2 �.� Z� D(-5 ,D 02- 0.24 6,e) 0.I(6 0,1V72 �5,0 -7, 1 1.2 17.o 15.6., Coo 0,8f I 5.5 3.5 4(�- 5.77 -7, 0 4, 5 Z70 , 57d 15 1? 57, 47 1 G • C� ,$) Dl {fl 7.-Z Cam, 9 -'b 3.2 5 7q$.0 �Z_70 I ,q , _ 5 ��I� (� -- - -- 1, 4 �3 7, f (�, (a �,7. 7g7,9 o -7q (o. I S5 0.7 5- :7-4- 1-7 5 • �7 °v.2 °o b S � -7 -� -- — 1. 4 L� b.2� �' . �' 7` &:72 �14.47 00 D, -7 5 I -7 �,. G q , l 7 s►--jF-I- r---"2 - 6i - - -- .4(✓3 �, 17 o, .0 5,D 13 Io l05- Ir2 5 C�,g 15 5.25 029'v 5.25 13,d I J.Z5 I 152 1.52 I '7.0 ,41 o, I.G31 5.2�1 7-0 :11 •` iP.S ID:iD D.Q� ZQ- 1 7 �v� ,.� 5�q5 ICI 2 i.l 13 27 �-q 7,o Iq.2 10.0 6-b 2qn I,Zo 24 22 DI- 9 5DM14-4- 0,90 •� 0.3573.101 1 6,r _/& 35 9 4- Z� 7-0 , 0 2I• 1 ✓ '7lZ -Z40 • I -/, O -A I i i I M'-. SECSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture Engineering, Planning M West Kirk Avenue, Roanoke, Virginia 2407 1 • i ; ®® � • • i ..:�.:I'��I�•.r: ,...r.� ...: : {:' nir. l .. .- J r-�r-�,�, ../ ��`� ;,�.,..; ,•.+.. ;,�....i. :.....:. ;.. . f. Z t , ; f t Fo , i ! e f , ...:....... . : F i. .:..: .:..: f ' { , t , i : ::.... ...... : ..... ...,. , ` , t 1 f , t } , f.. > i f t f , ; f _.,..a.-_-„f-_._------"--._..a-........4..,____•,,.a-_...,-._..:_..�__4..,_-.,__.,........,:.-. .<....�1.,-..._..-__...._.... .. . ... ................ ......_.. _.,.,...._-._-. .. ... _...., _ _, ...., 4 f ; , DBW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO SFCS -4 ORW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO SFCS -4 . .... r.........,,.......................s-_.w�.................... .......... .. ... ,. ...., .w. .. : '__., ...._....,.. .,...... ..., ._.. .,.... ... ......., 1 I - Y r ..: a C . 5 , �.: i , PI& El I 1 R r'ate, F Ill � r r I , , Fy , f f i t , l_( , , , t , , t } r it.{ � 'Rvi � t ir Cn2 . i r , N it" 1-7- QOF �C" -( � 1 ���I ►T L. ; , r ; , SECSSherertz, Franklin. Crawford, Shaffner f Arehdedure Engmoermg Planning 14 West Kuk Avenue, Ruanokc, Vvgmra 24011 • : y � y ® � • • _. __.._...._._.... i.....-_..... ;------------------ -.,-_-_ r DRW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO SFCS -4 TRW BY CKO BY DATE COMM NO O�20 n: SFCS -4 5 s ` � 5 o) 04 . SSE & 10 S Shereftc, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner 7, DRW -Y _ CKD BY DATE COMM NO C/i� t7 SFCS -4 D�W B, CKO BY DATE COMM NO SFCS -4 i. ....:.......... O slope of upstream face 2l i Gad 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2. H h —� 2.40 0 U.L U.4. U.O U.0 I.v h L DDw BY CKD BY DATE G iiMM NO G o 5 5,� E: SFCS -4 STORMWATER COMPUTATIONS COUNTY DISTRICT r_\r-c�rnin-rin►.i UCJI.,IZIr- I i,JI%! SHEET OF — FROM TO ARE A, DRAIN. A. RUN— OFF COEF. INLET CA i TIME I R.IIN FALL RUNOFF, Q i FHVERT ELEVATIONS LENGTH SLOPE D DIA. CJ`Pl.— CITY VEL. FLOW TIME RE>�cARKS POINT POINT ACRES C INCRE—. MENT ' ACCUM- ULATED. WIN— UTES IN./HR I- ; UPPER END LAWER END FT. �' IN. Cf.S. F.P,3. SEC. -3C.F.S. � .I Lov�l 52 -42 8S A-Bb 531.1 $3z) 4o Z,G7 ' 0��,. 12 58 43 1,4 �,O+ M r�=lp,�,. �S• I `�jDMI•E • 5,7 .25 I-Tz'l la-7 6.D 11.5 Soy. Co Dt-t 9� 95 S Zt�g,3.3 TTLom==.SM+, t� ►8 `i 7D1- - $, `: S1�.4 ��.1 225 175 ,'2 7.0 1� I ZS 9.8 I�.o ►3,s -C�=L.ot�I d- 4 - (� — . SS — .51 -- .4�. 3.15 2,.Gb I0.9 2 S.`� 5.9 "!�.(: ` 21.2 �o(�.o ?0z 5-M. go2.� o 23� -Z ! 2 - Z4 S5 2 , 0 tit-5 �DMI-�-2 D l - Co ►24- — ,108 — .Ili �" •II.• . I to �,o 5. 5 ��I le �1 Ild IT.� to.3 B��A- -19 9 In5 29a o.G ,-1 I I 5.9 13 .o 3.5 .5 3o 44, (. T� Q 4- ,7o -coo • DI- , 1�0 0 .© 7.1 r2 rl l3tTS -7.l `si 81 � 4 100 •I o q I15lt��o4 .►2.•35 N�r1 2 •4I DDIlM- 22.._.05..3 5,q 40. M TT'T(omom��===�=55,..1So1SM 1.3 a 1 �.:lo. obo � --�A- S4i 6,9 24.(0 g 78, ►—�� ,-7-5— �. SG G. S &. '786. �j.2 �DC1�-- 1-�a1- I - 2 0 . 2154 2411pn4r- . (300Z.Io 71 3�20_., I U01 0 0 1980 I 3. Time of Concentration (TC) = 15 min. (given) 4. Determine Rainfall Intensity Factor (i) (i) = 4.9 in/hr - (from Plate 5-3) 5. Q = C(i)(A) Q = .43(4.9)(80) = 168.56 cfs Table 5-2 VALUES OF RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (C) FOR RATIONAL FORMULA Land use C Land use C Business: Downtown areas 0.70-0.95 Lawns: Sandy soil, flat, 2% 0.05-0.10 Neighborhood areas 0.50-0.70 Sandy soil, average, 2-7% 0.10-0.15 Sandy soil, steep, 7% 0.15-0.20 Residential: Heavy soil, flat, 2% 0.13-0.17 Single-family areas 0.30-0.50 Heavy soil, average, 2-7% 0.18-0.22 Multi units, detached 0.40-0.60 Heavy soil, steep, 7 % 0.25-0.35 Multi units, attached 0.60-0.75 Suburban 0.25-0.40 Agricultural land: Bare packed soil Industrial: Smooth 0.30-0.60 Light areas 0.50-0.80 Rough' 0.20-0.50 Heavy areas 0.60-0.90 Cultivated rows Heavy soil no crop 0.30-0.60 Parks, cemeteries 0.10-0.25 Heavy soil with crop 0.20-0.50 Sandy soil no crop 0.20-0.40. Playgrounds 0.20-0.35 Sandy soil with crop 0.10-0.25 Pasture Railroad yard areas 0.20-0.40 Heavy soil Sandy soil 0.15-0.45 0.05-0.25 Unimproved areas 0.10-0.30 Woodlands 0.05-0.25 Streets: Asphaltic 0.70-0.95 Concrete 0.80-0.95 Brick 0.70-0.85 Drives and walks 0.75-0.85 Roofs 0.75-0.95 Note: The designer must use judgement to select the appropriate C value within the range. Generally, larger areas with permeable soils, flat slopes and dense vegetation should have lowest (C) values. Smaller areas with dense soils, moderate to steep slopes, and sparce vegetation should be assigned highest (C) values. Source: American Society of Civil Engineers V-5 r� 0 H (feet) — 500 L (feet) 100 10000 41 v e 50 5000 0 G) > Note: ro Use nomograph Tc for natural basins o c with well defined channels, for 0 overland flow on bare earth, and for mowed grass roadside channels. 41 E 10 For overland flow, grassed surfaces, E 1000 Of multiply Td by 2. E Y X o For overland flow, concrete or 500 5 asphalt surfaces, multiply Tc by 0.4. 0 s For concrete channels, multiply Tc o, v by 0.2. 1 ' TIME OF CONCENTRATION OF.SMALL DRAINAGE BASINS Source: VDH&T Tc (min.) 200 100 50 1 Plate 5-.2 V-7 • off-01 20.0 15.0 10.0 8.0 6.t 4.( 2. S- 0 0 x L v a v 0. 0. N v 0 N C b 4 0 C K C 0. 0, 0 0 Source: VDH&T RAINFALL FREQUENCY -INTENSITY -DURATION CHART RICHMOND, VA'. Minutes Duration Plate 5-4 V-9 • Critical Erosion Areas • There are no critical erosion areas presently. Proposed storm drainage structures shall collect rainwater from roofs and the major portion of the site that is being developed and pipe it to a new detention and then released at the pre -developed to the existing stream near U.S. Rt. 522. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Unless otheriise indicated, all vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control neasures shall be constructed and maintained according to minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Structural Practices 1. Temporary Gravel Construction Entrance 2. Construction Road Stabilization 3. Silt Fence 4. Storm Drain Inlet Protection 5. Outlet Protection 6. Ri p-rap 7. Dust Control 8. Detention Basin Veqetative Practices 1. Topsoil i ng 2. Permanent Seeding 3. Tree Preservation and Protection Management Strategies 1. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operation may begin and end as quickly as possible. 2. The sediment trapping measures shall be installed as a first step in grading. 3. Permanent seeding shall follow finish grading as immediately as possible. See plan for seed mixture. 4. Areas that will not be disturbed shall be flagged clearly. 5. The contractor shall be responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion and sediment control measures. Stormwater Management Calculation of runoff before and after development indicates that there will be an increase in runoff peak as a result of the addition of roof and paved areas to the site. (See attached runoff calculations). As a result of this and other offsite considerations, the stormwater shall be detained and piped to the stream previously mentioned. Maintenance All erosion and sediment control measures shall be checked weekly and after each significant rainfill according to recommendations of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. NARRATIVE Westminster Canterbury of Winchester Comm. No. 82058 Project Oescription The purpose of this project is the construction of a new long-term life care facility. The site of approximately 44 acres is located off of U.S. Rt. 522 on Frederick Mall Drive. The construction will consist of three interconnected buildings, loop road and resident and staff parking. Approximately 15 acres will be disturbed during construction. Existinq Site Conditions The site has irregular topography with elevations ranging from a high of 842 to a low of about 775. A majority of the site is forested with thick hardwoods. The remaining areas are grass covered with occasional isolated brushy areas within the grassy areas. Numerous rock outcrops occur in three well-defined belts that cross the property in a northeasterly direction. These belts are wooded and are topographically higher than the cleared, grassy areas on either side. The site is divided into three drainage areas which eventually merge to empty into a small stream near U.S. Rt. 522. Adjacent Property Frederick Mall Subdivision borders the site to the North, land of the Darlington Subdivision borders the site to the East, Clearbrook Woolen Company. borders the site to the South and private lots on 01d Fort Road borders the site to the West. Soils Two general soil horizons and one major rock unit exist over the building area. Topsoil generally blankets the entire site including the proposed access roads and parking areas. The topsoil thickness averages four to eight inches and is thicker in the forested areas except when rock outcrops. The topsoil is basically a low plastic silt with a trace of clay and organics. The bedrock surface is very irregular as a result of differential weathering. The bedrock is predominantly a hard gray limestone of the Conococheague Foundation. Interestingly enough, no groundwater was encountered -during soil testing proceedings. The soils engineer indicates that there can be dramatic fluctuations in the groundwater table that are directly related to the hydrological cycles and can occur rather rapidly. He has observed a groundwater rise in the Winchester area of approximately four to ten inches within 24 hours after a four inch rainfall. � 6 .....�..ow � ims ro1Nrt' of P I 161N SCS' ShererU. Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Virginia 2401114 West Kirk Avenue. oanoke DRW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO / � �• 5- vs a2oS8 �. 2 DFiW BV CKD BY DATE COMM NO � �2058 SFCS -4 G .W 1N DRW BY CKD BY DATE COMM NO _I C'G pyzor-� E: SFCS -4 A -a �N r 6, ��H 717-71 DRW Ely CKD BY OATE COMM NO SFCS'4 Supporting Data for the Rezoning Application WCW Westminster / Canterbury / Winchester Fredrick County / Winchester / Virginia March 11, 198 SFCSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner 14 West Kirk Avenue Architecture/Engineering/Planning Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 344-6664 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS AND OTHER SUPPORTING DATA FOR THE REZONING APPLICATION WESTMINSTER/CANTERBURY/WINCHESTER, INC. MARCH 11, 1983 SHERERTZ, FRANKLIN, CRAWFORD, SHAFFNER ARCHITECTURE/ENGINEERING/PLANNING 14 WEST KIRK AVENUE ROANOKE, VIRGINIA COMMISSION NO. 82058 � I 1 � I � I � I I I I I I L� i] 1. What is being proposed? Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester is a nonprofit corporation organized by Virginia Diocesan Homes and Westminster Presbyterian Homes, in cooperation with Christ Episcopal Church and the First Presbyterian Church in Winchester, Virginia for the purpose of developing a multi -level care facility in the Winchester area. The long and successful history of similar Westminster -Canterbury facilities in Richmond, Lynchburg, and Virginia Beach, and Goodwin House in Alexandria as well as the desire of the Board of Directors of Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester to provide both housing and health care services to older adults under a life care program has stimulated interest in the development of a new life care facility in the Winchester, Virginia area. The Life Care Concept It is planned that the services and amenities of the Westminster/Canterbury/ Winchester facility will be offered in a life care program, that is, a retirement facility which provides a full continuum of residential living and health care options and a variety of ancillary services on one site. The concept of the multi -level care retirement community has evolved in response to the changing service needs of individuals as they become older. Persons generally enter a retirement community at some time after their 65th birthday. Current entry ages at similar retirement facilities average approximately 75 to 78 years. Admission policies typically require that entrants enjoy good physical and mental health and are able to live in an independent setting with the support services available in the facility. Such services offered by most retirement communities include congregate meals, housekeeping and linen service, transportation, preventative health services, counseling, and opportunities for social interaction. When individuals are no longer able to maintain themselves independently in their apartments, making use of the available residential services, they may be transferred to the health care unit where they are provided with 2 additional services such as personal care or intermediate or skilled nursing care. Care is provided to a resident of a continuing care facility throughout the resident's lifetime. Program of Resident Services A program of services will be included in the basic fee structure paid by each resident. These services include the following program elements: e three meals served daily in the central dining room, with.provision for credit given to persons who desire only one or two meals daily • housekeeping services provided on a bi-weekly basis • all utilities, including local telephone service • common area and living unit maintenance and repair • services to ensure the safety and security of the residents • a social program to include such regularly scheduled activities as educational programs, entertainment, special events, creative arts activities, woodworking, group trips, etc. counseling, spiritual assistance and worship services available at the facility • transportation on a regularly scheduled basis • central switchboard to take messages for residents • 24-hour response to emergency telephone calls 3 • emergency medical services • on -site clinic to provide such health care services as health screening, preventative care, appointments with health professionals, etc. • lifetime personal care and nursing care in semi -private accommodations In addition, several other program elements could be offered on a fee -for -service basis in order to offer residents of WCW a wider range of services to meet their varied needs, but still enable those with limited incomes, or who do not wish to receive such assistance, to pay for only those services which they would utilize. Such service options include: • additional housecleaning services as required • linen and towel service • covered parking • beauty and barber appointments • appointments with health care professionals and medical services on site • pharmaceutical services • laboratory testing • physical therapy and other types of rehabilitative services • private nursing care accommodations • other special services such as private parties, catering, etc. L' 4 Safetv and Securit The design and operation of Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will be planned to ensure the safety and security of the residents. The plan proposed as part of the retirement community design will require that special attention be paid to security in the residential buildings as well as the other structures planned for the facility. A "front desk" will be incorporated into the design .of the main lobby of the central services building and the health care center. Both the front desk in the central services building and the health care unit desk will function 24 hours a day, seven days each week, while the desk in the central services core will be manned daily during regular business hours. A telephone communication system will enable staff to respond to telephone calls on a 24-hour basis and provide emergency assistance to the residents ' will be planned. Further, each resident apartment, personal care accommondation, and nurisng care room will have a call system device which can be used to signal staff in the event of an emergency. Within the ' apartments, these devices will be located in the bathroom within easy reach of the tub/shower and toilet, in the bedroom(s), and possibly in the kitchen. 1 On the personal care floor and nursing care floors, emergency call devices will be provided in each resident room, in all baths, and in the central bathing rooms. The use of a portable call system will be investigated prior to finalizing the safety and security provisions for the new facility. ' Main entrances to the central services building and health care center will be locked during evening hours. Exterior doors to the multi -story ' residential buildings will remain locked at all times. For security purposes, a two-way communication system will be provided at the main ' entrance to the central services.building to enable residents in their apartments to speak with visitors or delivery persons at the locked doors to the building and to permit only desired individuals access to the building. An evening.security guard will be employed to patrol the buildings and full campus. 1I 5 � I � I � I 1 1 I Activities Proqram A program of social, recreational, physical, and cultural activities will be offered at the new facility to provide opportunities for social interaction and personal development. The activities program is envisioned to include a variety of programs offered on the retirement facility campus, and afford residents opportunities to share in activities and programs available in the community as well. Transportation Transportation will be made available for those residents who do not own their own vehicles or those desiring to take advantage of this service. The facility will operate one vehicle. Emergency medical transportation will be provided by community rescue squards. Emergency Medical and Clinic Service Supervision of medications, support as needed for individuals with chronic ailments which require awareness of the condition and occasional attention, health screening, and the provision of emergency medical assistance will be available for all residents through the health clinic proposed for the facility. Other assistance which might be provided by the clinic on a fee -for -service basis could include pharmacy services, laboratory tests, and provision of personal care to apartment residents who need assistance during temporary illnesses or incapacities. In addition, arrangements with such specialists as podiatrists, dentists, and physical and occupational therapists would also be scheduled during clinic hours, with residents paying for such services as needed, less the portion of the fee defrayed by the individual's Medicare coverage, where applicable. Overview of the Master Plan for Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester The Master Plan for Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will provide for the development of the multi -level care facility in two phases in order to enable the facility to meet the potential demand for the proposed services and amenities in -an orderly, planned and cost-effective manner. A total of 300 101 t 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 residential units in several 2 to 5 story buildings is planned in two phases, and a central services building for administrative functions, common areas for residents, and service oriented facilities is included. Phase I of the Master Plan includes 120 residential units for independent living in multi -story buildings, 108 care beds in the Health Care Center, and the Central Services Building, which is connected to both the multi -story residential building(s) and Health Care Center. In order to address the potential demand for residential living accommodations in the future, up to 180 additional apartments could be added to the site in building(s) of multi -story construction. Consideration may also be given to expansion of the Health Care Center to provide additional personal care and/or nursing care accommodations, adult day-care, respite care beds, or other health related spaces. Interior Spaces - Central Services Buildin The central services building of Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will include social and activity areas for resident use, administrative offices, kitchen and dining areas, the resident clinic, and all service and maintenance functions. Central services will be constructed as a two-story building connected to the residential buildings and the Health Care Center. Interior Spaces - Health Care Center The Health Care Center of the Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester retirement facility will be planned to accommodate a variety of health -related services and accommodations: • per care rooms (licensed by the Virginia Department of Social Services as Home for Adult beds) • nursing care rooms (licensed by the Virginia Department of Health as intermediate and skilled nursing care beds) 1 7 i .1 � I I I I I LJ 11 1 physical and occupational therapy spaces for use by residents of the facility living at each level of care, and possibly by persons who reside in Winchester and the surrounding community • health care administrative offices The Health Care Center building will be planned as a three-story structure. The first floor will accommodate the main reception area for health care residents and services, the administrative offices, physical and occupational therapy rooms, and a personal care unit. A fully enclosed connecting corridor will link the Health Care Center with the public spaces located in the central services building of the facility. Exterior Spaces The exterior setting of the new retirement community proposed by Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will provide residents with a natural and functional environment in which to enjoy leisure activities, and will address the efficient delivery of goods and services to the facility. The overall planning of the site, the selection of building materials, and the landscape design, will also be consistent with the natural environment of the site selected for development and the neighborhood surrounding the property. Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester has acquired a parcel of land near the Frederick Mall Subdivision. The property is partially within the Winchester City limits and partially in Frederick County. This 27 plus acres is partially wooded and is situated on a hillside. To provide access to the property from Route 522, Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will purchase a 2.9 + acre tract of land at the north end of the property of Frederick Mall Subdivision. The exterior design of the buildings and the development and landscaping of the site will reflect the locality in which the project is being developed and the natural surroundings of the property. Proper orientation to the sun, wind, slope of the property and other siting issues related to energy conservation, glare during high use times of the day, etc. will also be given special attention by the architects, as well as needed access to parking facilities, walking paths, storage, utilities, and other amenities. It will be important that the internal spaces of the facility be developed to accommodate the intended functions, however, the design of both interior and exterior elements will be considered simultaneously to ensure that both are compatible, functional, and aesthetically pleasing. The preceeding data was edited from the Architectural and Behavioral Program for Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester, Inc., prepared by Van Scoyoc Associates, dated December 1982. 2. How will W/C/W relate to the 1982 Comprehensive Plan for The City of Winchester? Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will fulfill the goals for the Comprehensive Plan. W/C/W provides a variation in residential types, creates and maintains common open space and is compatible with adjacent areas. W/C/W provides an attractive and harmonious urban environment. 3. What type of buildings are on the W/C/W site, and what density is achieved? Central Services: 2 stories - 35,000 square feet Health Care: Private Room - 225 square feet 60 Semi -Private Room - 350 square feet 48 108 Total 3 Stories - 55,000 square feet Multi -Story Residential: Studio - 450 square feet 30 1 Bedroom - 700 square feet 60 2 Bedroom - 900 square feet 24 2. conservation, glare during high use times of the day, etc. will also be given special attention by the architects, as well as needed access to parking facilities, walking paths, storage, utilities, and other amenities. It will be important that the internal spaces of the facility be developed to accommodate the intended functions, however, the design of both interior and exterior elements will be considered simultaneously to ensure that both are compatible, functional, and aesthetically pleasing. The preceeding data was edited from the Architectural and Behavioral Program for Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester, Inc., prepared by Van Scoyoc Associates, dated December 1982. How will W/C/W relate to the 1982 Comprehensive Plan for The City of Winchester? Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester will fulfill the goals for the Comprehensive Plan. W/C/W provides a variation in residential types, creates and maintains common open space and is compatible with adjacent areas. W/C/W provides an attractive and harmonious urban environment. 3. What type of buildings are on the W/C/W site, and what density is achieved? Central Services: 2 stories - 35,000 square feet Health Care: Private Room - 225 square feet 60 Semi -Private Room - 350 square feet 48 108 Total 3 Stories - 55,000 square feet ....; 9 2 Bedroom/2 Bath - 1,000 square feet 6 120 Total (1st Phase) 180 Total (2nd Phase) 300 Ultimate The 180 units of Phase II shall be constructed as demand and marketing requires. Density: City - 160 units : 11.36 acres = Density of 14.08 residential units/acre. County - 140 units 18.53 acres = Density of 7.56 residential units/acre. 4. What is the fire protection plan for W/C/W? All structures will utilize a fire alarm system, which shall be monitored in the Central Services Building. The multi -story residential buildings, Central Services and Health Care buildings shall utilize an automatic fire suppression (sprinkler) system. Fire hydrants, tied into the water distribution system, shall be located at appropriate distances throughout the site. Also, local Winchester and Frederick County Fire Departments will be called upon in times of emergency. Primary access is from U. S. Route 522, with a secondary entrance off Old Fort Road (for fire protection access only). This Old Fort Road connection is emergency access only, is 22' wide, and shall be constructed to allow passage of any emergency vehicle. 5. What type of fire resistant construction is planned for W/C/W? 1981 BOCA Buildinq Code Construction Data: CENTRAL SERVICES BUILDING: Use Group Classification A-3 Assembl Building Height - 2-story - 30' Building Area Per Floor - 17,500 sq. ft. Minimum type of construction required - 2C Noncombustible Unprotected 9 4. 5. Multi -Story Residential: Studio - 450 square feet 30 1 Bedroom - 700 square feet 60 2 Bedroom - 900 sqyare feet 24 2 Bedroom/2 Bath - 1,000 square feet 6 120 Total (1st Phase) 180 Total (2nd Phase) 300 Ultimate 300 units = site area 29.89 acres = density of 10.04 residential units/acre What is the fire protection plan for W/C/W? All structures will utilize a fire alarm system, which shall be monitored in the Central Services Building. The multi -story residential buildings, Central Services and Health Care buildings shall utilize an automatic fire suppression (sprinkler) system. Fire hydrants, tied into the water distribution system, shall be located at appropriate distances throughout the site. Also, local Winchester and Frederick County Fire Departments will be called upon in times of emergency. Primary access is from U. S. Route 522, with a secondary entrance off Old Fort Road (for fire protection access only). What type of fire resistant construction is planned for W/C/W? 1981 BOCA Buildinq Code Construction Data: CENTRAL SERVICES BUILDING: Use Group Classification A-3 Assembly Building Height - 2-story - 30' Building Area Per Floor - 17,500 sq. ft. Minimum type of construction required - 2C Noncombustible Unprotected . 1 4 .�' Owl". 10 HEALTH CARE CENTER: Use Group Classification I-2 Institutional, Incapacited Building Height - 3-story Building Area Per Floor - 17,500 sq. ft. Minimum type of construction required - 2B Noncombustible Protected 5-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING: Use Group Classification I-3 Institutional, Residental Care (1983 BOCA Supplement and State Building Code Technical Review Board Interpertation #155, Revised November 9, 1982) Building Height - 5-stories - 55 feet Building Area per floor - 27,000 sq. ft. Minimum type of construction required - 2B Noncombustible Protected 6. What is the general design for roads and parking for W/C/W? All roads shall be designed and constructed to meet VDH&T standards. Roads shall be typically 24' in width, and curbless. Parking areas shall have 20' deep spaces and 24' aisles where shown. Maintenance of roads will be the responsibility of W/C/W. 7. How much parking is provided for W/C/W? Number of Residential Apartments - 300 - 310 Spaces Number of Health Care Beds - 108 - 54 Spaces Number of Visitor Spaces and Central Facility/Health Care - 36 Spaces Number of Staff Parking Spaces - 54 Spaces 454 Total Spaces This achieves 1.5 spaces per living unit. It is our past experience with similar types of site developments that this ratio of parking is more than adequate for this project. The typical size of each parking space will be 9' x 20' 10 � I � I I I I I 1 HEALTH CARE CENTER: Use Group Classification I-2 Institutional, Incapacited Building Height - 3-story Building Area Per Floor - 17,500 sq. ft. Minimum type of construction required - 2B Noncombustible Protected 5-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING: Use Group Classification I-3 Institutional, Residental Care (1983 BOCA Supplement and State Building Code Technical Review Board Interpertation #155, Revised November 9, 1982) Building Height - 5-stories - 60 feet Building Area per floor - 27,000 sq. ft. Minimum type of construction required - 2B Noncombustible Protected 6. What is the general design for roads and parking for W/C/W? All roads shall be designed and constructed to meet VDH&T standards. Roads shall be typically 24' in width, and curbless. Parking areas shall have 20' deep spaces and 24' aisles where shown. Maintenance of roads will be the responsibility of W/C/W. 7. How much parking is provided for W/C/W? Number of Residential Apartments - 300 - 310 Spaces Number of Health Care Beds - 108 - 54 Spaces Number of Visitor Spaces and Central Facility/Health Care - 36 Spaces Number of Staff Parking Spaces - 54 Spaces 454 Total Spaces This achieves 1.5 spaces per living unit. It is our past experience with similar types of site developments that this ratio of parking is more than adequate for this project. The typical size of each parking space will be 9' x 20' I 8. How will W/C/W affect roads? The main entrance for W/C/W will be off US Route No. 522, and Frederick Mall Drive. Service vehicles will also use this entrance. The amount of traffic increase shall be minimal and will not occur at normal peak traffic hours, 1 therefore, no adverse affect on roadways for the City or County will occur. 9. Will W/C/W have any affect on local sewer and water? W/C/W plans to tie into an existing 8" sanitary line located in a 20' utility ' easement of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. See Schematic Utility Plan, Sheet No. S3.2. Mr. Wellington Jones, of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, has advised that more than adequate capacity exists, and W/C/W will not create any adverse affect on the system. W/C/W plans to utilize both the City and County's water supply. W/C/W will tie into existing water lines located in Frederick Mall Drive and Old Fort Road. See Schematic Utility Plan, Sheet No. S3.2. Utilizing both water supplies will be more efficient and will facilitate in fire protection. There will not be any adverse effect on either water supply system. 10. What are the fuel sources for W/C/W? Natural gas will be the primary fuel source for heating and other uses for W/C/W. Electricity will be a secondary source. Underground fuel oil storage tanks will be utilized for the emergency generators required for this facility. l 11. How will solid waste disposal be conducted? A private firm shall be contracted with to remove solid waste from the site. Small individual dumpsters will be utilized by the residents and employees. The waste will be removed to the joint City/County landfill. 12 12. Is there an entrance sign planned? The entrance sign will be located appropriately near the entrance to enable motorists to easily locate the site. It will be of a design that complements the Westminster/Canterbury/ Winchester site, and will be lighted for nightime visibility. The sign will be sized to conform to the zoning ordinance. 13. How will W/C/W affect Frederick County's and the City of Winchester's population? It is estimated that the number of increased residents for the City and County from W/C/W will not be significant. The W/C/W population will be approximately 483 persons, and it is anticipated that 75-80% of these residents presently live within 25-30 miles of the site. There will not be a significant increase in population from professional employees moving to the area. 14. Will W/C/W have an affect on schools? W/C/W will not have an affect on area schools. There will not be any children living in this facility. Professional employees moving to the area may have children, but this will not have a significant affect on schools. 15. What affect does W/C/W have on Public Services? W/C/W shall have its own security personnel, therefore relieving local police of some of this responsibility. W/C/W will depend on the local Fire Department for any event that requires their aid. A private firm will be contracted with for solid waste removal to the County landfill. Emergency transportation by rescue squads may be required when emergencies occur. 16. How will ?C W W affect the Count 's economy? // y y W/C/W is a non-profit, tax-exempt organization. W/C/W will provide approximately 104 additional jobs for the community, and increase services I I 13 required, such as groceries and entertainment. (W/C/W desires financing through the local Industrial Development Authority as a "Light Clean Industry".) 17. Will the project lead to a significant increase in air pollution? Operations conducted on the W/C/W site will not generate a significant increase in air pollution. All buildings use efficient, clean sources of energy, therefore, no production of pollutants shall occur. The small amount of traffic increase for the project will not significantly increase air pollution. 18. Will the project lead to a significant increase in water pollution? What is the ability of waste water system to meet demand without degrading water quality? How will water supply be affected? There will not be a significant increase in water pollution. The water supply will be furnished by the City and County. The waste water will be handled by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Therefore, water quality and tsupply will not be affected. ' 19. Would the project lead to a significant increase in the ambient noise level for a substantial number of people? Activities on the W C/W site will not generate unusual or significant levels / 9 9 I of noise. In addition, buffer zones of vegetation shall be maintained in and around the site to assist in reducing noise levels created on and off the site. 20. Will the project lead to poor incompatible land use, soil erosion or soil pollution? ' W/C/W is a very compatible land use for this site. Much of the site shall be maintained as naturalistic or upgraded. Soil erosion will be insignificant, ' as the site shall be designed to meet criteria set forth in the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Manual. 14 21. Will the project destroy or derogate from an important recreation area? The W/C/W project will not destroy or derogate any recreational areas. W/C/W with its naturalistic and landscaped areas will create a park -like atmosphere. 22. Would the project alter the pattern of behavior of wildlife or interfere with important breeding, nesting, or feeding grounds? The W/C/W project will not significantly interfere with wildlife behavior. In actuality, wildlife will be encouraged to live on the site. This is accomplished by maintaining naturalistic and landscaped areas. 23. Would the project disturb the ecological balance of land or water area, or impact critical areas such as flood plains, unstable soils, steep slopes and aquifer recharge areas? The W/C/W project will not upset the ecological balance of the land. The site is not located in a 100 year flood plain, nor will it contribute to a flood plain. There are not any steep banks on the site to contend with. There will not be any significant affect on the aquifer recharge area. 24. Would the project have significant effect upon areas of historical, archaeological, cultural, or educational scientific significance? The W/C/W site will not have any impact upon areas of historical, archaeological, cultural or educational scientific significance. 25. Will the project have an adverse aesthetic or visual effect? How is common space considered? W/C/W will be carefully designed and site planned to provide a project that is sensitive to the surrounding area, the site itself, and to the future residents and neighbors. There will not be any adverse aesthetic or visual problem created. There will be approximately 6.5 acres of common open space . R L t 14 21. Will the project destroy or derogate from an important recreation area? The W/C/W project will not destroy or derogate any recreational areas. W/C/W with its naturalistic and landscaped areas will create a park -like atmosphere. 22. Would the project alter the pattern of behavior of wildlife or interfere with important breeding, nesting, or feeding grounds? The W/C/W project will not significantly interfere with wildlife behavior. In actuality, wildlife will be encouraged to live on the site. This is accomplished by maintaining naturalistic and landscaped areas. 23. Would the project disturb the ecological balance of land or water area, or impact critical areas such as flood plains, unstable soils, steep slopes and aquifer recharge areas? The W/C/W project will not upset the ecological balance of the land. The site is not located in a 100 year flood plain, nor will it contribute to a fflood plain. There are not any steep banks on the site to contend with. There will not be any significant affect on the aquifer recharge area. 24. Would the project have significant effect upon areas of historical, archaeological, cultural, or educational scientific significance? The W/C/W site will not have any impact upon areas of historical, archaeological, cultural or educational scientific significance. ' 25. Will the project have an adverse aesthetic or visual effect? W/C/W will be carefully designed and site planned to provide a project that is sensitive to the surrounding area, the site itself, and to the future residents and neighbors. There will not be any adverse aesthetic or visual problem created. y V for the residents in the site area located in the City, W/C/W will be responsible for management of this common open space, which is about 57% of the land located within the City limits. Existing foot trails in the open space will be utilized with existing vegetation being preserved and certain areas upgraded. There will be approximately 10 acres of common space in the portion of the site located in the County. Will the project have a detrimental effect on the safety of the community? W/C/W will not have a detrimental affect on the safety of the community. W/C/W shall have its own security personnel, therefore allowing local police time for other tasks. The local rescue squads may be called upon in times of emergency but this will not have a detrimental effect on the overall safety of the community. Phase I of W/C/W includes the development of the following: A Central Services Core of approximately 25,000 square feet A 108 bed Health Care Facility 120 studio, one, and two bedroom residential units in multi -story buildings Common open space Walking paths Resident gardening areas Loop road Parking Major utilities Phase II of W/C/W includes: Expansion of residential living units of up to 100 units, depending upon demand. Expansion of Health Care Facility as required. Parking as required Common open space r, , C 15 26. Will the project have a detrimental effect on the safety of the community? W/C/W will not have a detrimental affect on the safety of the community. W/C/W shall have its own security personnel, therefore allowing local police time for other tasks. The local rescue squads may be called upon in times of emergency but this will not have a detrimental effect on the overall safety of the community. In summary, we have attempted to describe what Westminster/Canterbury/Winchester, Inc. is, who the sponsors are, where the project is proposed and how it is planned. We have attempted to make the Master Plan: 1) Comply with all of the residential objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. 2) Comply with all of the uses permitted and use regulations of the P.U.D. District of the City and the R-6 District of the County. 3) Be functionally related to other permitted structures, and not be injurious or detrimental to the property or improvements in the neighborhood. 4) Be so designed and located that the -public health, safety, and welfare will be promoted and protected. 5) Be in accord with the purposes of the adopted Comprehensive Plan. -'W, . t r , 0 I �L(-))ZvSb IrL/G ( W I DESCRIPTION OF LAND TO BE CONVEYED TO WESTMINSTER/CANTERBURY/WINCHESTER, INC. CITY OF WINCHESTER AND FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA ' John McNair and Associates Waynesboro, Virginia ' January 21, 1983 Beginning at an iron pin in the east boundary line of Lot No. 9, Old Fort ' Subdivision, being also the common boundary between Old Fort Subdivision and lands of Clearbrook Woolen Co., thence 'along remaining Clearbrook Woolen Co. lands the following seven (7) courses and distances; ' N84031'10"E 139.32 feet to an iron pin, thence S41048'23"E 161.81 feet to a wooden gate post, thence N39010'07"E 684.60 feet to an iron pin, thence ' N14003'11"E 422.46 feet to a railroad spike driven in the west side of an 18-inch hickory, thence N36014'40"E 140.76 feet to an iron pin, thence N23054'27"E 74.67 feet to an iron pin, thence N11037'15"W 260.80 feet to an iron pin in line of land now or formerly of J. P. Darlington, thence along same S71°20'59"W 143.33 feet to an iron pin set in the base of an old post, thence continuing along lands now or formerly of J. P. Darlington N74058'22"W 509.00 feet to an iron pin, being the southeast corner of Lot "J", ' Frederick Mall Subdivision, thence along same N75°42'18"W 180.12 feet to an iron pin, thence along other land of Frederick Mall Subdivision N75°42'18"W 308.34 feet to an iron pin in the center of an old road, in line of lands now t or formerly of Winifred O'Rear, thence along same and along the center of an old road S1°12'47"E 241.86 feet to a concrete monument, being the northernmost corner of Lot 17 of Old Fort Subdivision, thence continuing along the center ' of the old road, being the eastern boundary of Old Fort Subdivision, the following twelve (12) courses and distances; S1035'33"E 185.99 feet to an iron pin, thence ' S11007'03"E 295.82 feet to an iron pin, thence S8016'57"E 133.81 feet to an iron pin, thence S6042'58"E 57.07 feet to an iron pin, thence ' S6043'54"E 10.00 feet to an iron pin, thence S12030'48"E 50.29 feet to an iron pin, thence S17015'57"E 120.00 feet to an iron pin, thence ' S15038'23"E 92.55 feet to an iron pin, thence S18007'38"E 129.32 feet to an iron pin, thence S16046'36"E 128.59 feet to an iron pin, thence S16047'18"E 25.00 feet to an iron pin, thence ' S11039'10'E 38.25 feet to the point and place of beginning, containing 26.95 acres. DESCRIPTION OF LOT "J", FREDERICK MALL SUBDIVISION FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA John McNair and Associates Waynesboro, Virginia January 21, 1983 Beginning at an iron pin in line of land of Clearbrook Woolen Co., being ' the southwest corner of Darlington Subdivision, thence with the Clearbrook Woolen Co. land N75°42'18"W 180.12 feet to an iron pin in an old stone fence, thence with other land of Frederick Mall Subdivision N4°26'49"E 485.12 feet to an iron pin on the south edge of the cul-de-sac of Frederick Mall Drive, ' thence along a curve to the left, said curve being of 50.00 foot radius with chord bearing of N55°46'39"E and chord distance of 62.42 feet, an arc distance of 67.45 feet to an iron pin on the east edge of the cul-de-sac, thence along ' Lot "I" of Frederick Mall Subdivision S72°50'37"E 270.00 feet to an iron pin in line of land of Darlington Subdivision, thence with the Darlington Sub- division land S19°39'12"W 513.50 feet to the point and place of beginning, 1 containing 2.9375 acres. 7 i I I COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRQ1N1A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG,22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 December 21, 1990 Mr. H. K. Benham, III C/O Harrison & Johnston 21 South Loudoun Street P. O. Box 809 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Benham: DEC �- b imp WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ref: Westminister-Canterbury Subd. Route 522 North Frederick County I am writing in response to your letter of October 16, 1990 concerning the above referenced project. The "as built" site plans of the project which were submitted by Greenway Engineering & Surveying Company, Inc. appear to be in order. However, please note the turn around easement at the end of Westminister-Canterbury Drive is missing. We will require this easement be shown on the "as built" plan as well as proof the easement was actually put to record at the Frederick County Clerk's Office. For your use I have enclosed a copy of Sheet 3 of 5 of Tudor Square - Section I plats which detail a portion of said turn around. Once the above has been addressed, please resubmit two (2) copies of the "as built" plans to this office. Should you have any questions, please give me a call. Hwy. RBC / rf Enclosures xc: Mr. F. E. Wymer Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. H. Bruce Edens Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior b COUNTY o f FREDERICI � � • .�. � .. . _ as Department of Planning and Development v - - John T.P. Horne - Planning Director ' Stephen M. Gyurisin -, Deputy Director 703/662-4532 June 13, 1985 Mr. Fred Allen r:.r Westminster -Canterbury 35 E. Boscawen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Allen: This letter is to confirm the Frederick County.Planning Commis$ion's action at their meeting of June 5, 1985: Approval of Site Plan #011-85,of Westminster, -Canterbury gf,wip�hester to construct a life care retirement facility, south of Raute,522'�a.•Sunnyside, Gainesboro Magisterial District, with the 'addition: of a crosebier on Route 522 at the intersection with Frederick Mall Drive; the upgrading of'the: .surf are of Y Frederick Mall Drive in order for that road to be•accepted into the VDH&T's system; and with regard to storm water management, the installation of A detention pond and an 18" pipeline with outflow at 'the, first residents' driveway and improvements to the two''culverts downstream to provide adequate flow under those driveways._ .The site plan must be amended to .'indicate the.'above additional I - r items. If you have any, questions regarding your site plan, please don't hesitate'to call me. P ely, . P. Horneor JTPH/dkg 1' f t .. 4. '�, . r , r a i, • 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 - F " Winchester,' Virginia COUNTY of FR EDER 1CK I Department of Planning and Development John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 June 13, 1985 Mr. Fred Allen Westminster -Canterbury 35 E. Boscawen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Allen: This letter is to confirm the Frederick County Planning Commission's action at their meeting of June 5, 1985: Approval of Site Plan #011-85 of Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester to construct a life care retirement facility, south of Route 522 in Sunnyside, Gainesboro Magisterial District, with the addition of a crossover on Route 522 at the intersection with Frederick Mall Drive; the upgrading of the surface of Frederick Mall Drive in order for that road to be accepted into the VDH&T's system; and with regard to storm water management, the installation of a detention pond and an 18" pipeline with outflow at the first residents' driveway and improvements to the two culverts downstream to provide adequate flow under those driveways. The site plan must be amended to indicate the above additional items. if you have any questions regarding your site plan, please don't hesitate to call me. Si rely, Kn T. P. Horne rector JTPH/dkg 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Ll SITE PLAN #011-85 w Westiminster Canterbury of Winchester Zoned RP (Residential Performance) LOCATION: South of Route 522 in Sunnyside, adjacent to the City. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING: Open space land use and RP and B-2 Zoning. PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS: Construct a life care retirement facility with required site improvements. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Inspections Department - All proposed structures to be built in accordance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and any other applicable standards. Highway Department - Attached is a copy of a letter dated July 13, 1984 which indicates what our requirements will be prior to adding Frederick Mall Drive to the Secondary System. Round Hill Fire Company - Satisfactory. Sanitation Department 1) Wholesale meter vault to have double check valves and by-pass around the vault. Meter to be Hersey-Sparling MFM-MCT detector meter or approved equal. 2) All meters to be furnished by developer. Domestic water meter to be compound type Hersey or Badger and to have by-pass around meter. See Standard Detail W-11. 3) Valves must be installed where water line ties into existing lines. 4) Valve must be installed on line from County at tee with line from City. 5) Inlet 8" valve in meter vault for development may be eliminated. 6) Extension of water line from extension City of Winchester Main to the master meter vault to be in accordance with City standards and specifications. P')J Page 2 Westminster -Canterbury Site Plan Planning and Zoning - This site plan is the proposed Phase I for construction of this facility which includes: 120 residential units and a 5-story structure, a 2-story 34,450 square foot central services structure, a 2-story 80 bed health care structure, and required parking. Access is off Frederick Mall Drive from Route 522. All structural, on -site access, and parking facilities meet the requirements of the zoning ordinance. Two major issues were identified at the rezoning hearings and are proposed to be addressed as follows: 1) ACCESS FROM ROUTE 522 A crossover on Route 522 is needed at the intersection with Frederick Mall Drive. Enclosed is a letter from Westminster -Canterbury stating that their intention is to construct this crossover prior to occupancy of the structures. VDH&T has approved this construction and final design will be done at a later date. Frederick Mall Drive is not now in the system and VDH&T has stated the need for upgrading of the surface on that road prior to acceptance. Enclosed is a letter from VDH&T. Westminster -Canterbury and the Frederick Mall Land Trust are now in negotiations on the cost sharing of this proposal. Both the above access improvements will be done as a condition of occupancy. 2) OFF -SITE DRAINAGE There are some residences downstream from this site which have had problems in the past with surface and groundwater from this site and from all other other areas of this drainage basin. Westminster -Canterbury and the staff have discussed a number of proposals to insure that runoff from this site does not exacerbate this problem and these proposals have been discussed with the residents at two meetings. Those measures discussed have been on -site detention with outflow over land at predevelopment rates; on -site detention with outflow into a concrete pipe and piping the outflow at predevelopment rates to a point beyond the downstream residents; and on -site detention and retention with minimal outflow at far below predevelopment rates. Westminster -Canterbury proposes and the staff recommends a structure that would entail on -site retention of a 5-year storm with a minimum outflow through an approximate 4" pipe and detention of a 10-year storm with outflow at predevelopment rates through an 18" diameter standpipe. The minimum 4" outflow should have no perceptible affect on downstream residents and will prevent stagnation of the water in the retention basin. At no time will outflow from a 10-year storm exceed predevelopment rates and outflow from the 4" pipe should be far below predevelopment rates. i Page 3 Westminster -Canterbury Site Plan The plan now shows a major system of storm sewers and drop inlets to collect site stormwater and transfer of this water to a detention basin. The staff recommends that this detention basin design be amended to show a detention -retention design as discussed above. The City of Winchester has approved this site plan with no changes in site design. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval, with amendments to the detention basin to incorporate the detention -retention design as proposed above; and with notes to be placed on the site plan stating that a crossover will be contstructed on Route 522 and that Frederick Mall Drive will be upgraded to meet VDH&T standards prior to occupancy of any residential structures. COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development M E M O R A N D U M John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 VA Dept. of Highways & Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington Jones Round Hill Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Ty Cather Inspections Department ATTN: Mr. John W. Dennison Planning Department , ATTN: Mr. John T. P. Horne Zoning Department ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director DATE: May 2, 1985 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Vacation of Plat X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Westminster Canterbury of Winchester or their representative, Mr. Fred Allen 665-0156 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: Attached is a copy of a letter dated July 13, 1984 which indicates what our requirements will be prior to adding Frederick Mall Drive to the Secondary System. IN 1A1213IQ� k �— o`�e Gov ti� .1Z 9Z� Signature Date - —� Q Cniirt CrniarP P (-1 Rimy 601 WinrhPeter. Virginia 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development M E M O R A N D U M John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 VA Dept. of Highways & Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington Jones Round Hill Fire Company TN: Mr. Ty Cather Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. John W. Dennison Planning Department , ATTN: Mr. John T. P. Horne Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director DATE: May 2, 1985 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Vacation of Plat X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Westminster Canterbury of Winchester or their representative, Mr. Fred Allen 665-0156 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: Signature Date 6 ,1 4 h5 E w Q ('rnirt Cniiar- P () Rnx 601 WinehPcter. Virginia 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK I Department of Planning and Development John T.P. Horne - Planning Director M E M O R A N D U M Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 VA Dept. of Highways & Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington Jones Round Hill Fire Company 600 ATTN: Mr. Ty Cather Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. John W. Dennison Planning Department , ATTN: Mr. John T. P. Horne Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director DATE: May 2, 1985 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Vacation of Plat X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Westminster Canterbury of Winchester or their representative, Mr. Fred Allen 665-0156 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: Signature Date 0 Cn,irt CnnarP _ P n Rnx 6ni - Winche ter. Virfyinia - 22601 • G' RECEIVED DEPT. OF PLANNING .0 AND DEVELOPMENT. M E M 0 R A N D U COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development M John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662 4532 VA Dept. of s� Hi hwa`Trans ortation ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority, V_ ATTN: Mr. Wellington Jones Round Hill Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Ty Cather Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. John W. Dennison Planning Department , ATTN: Mr. John T. P. Horne Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director DATE: May 2, 1985 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Vacation of Plat X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Westminster Canterbury of Winchester or their, reprerttig, Mr. Fred Allen 665-0156 Will you �>W hed and return your comments to me as soon as possible.' U� MAY � l�o� THIS SPACE SHOULD BE U ED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: Wholesale meter vault to have double check valves and by-pass around the vault. Meter to be Hersey-Sparling MFM-MCT detector meter or approved equal. All meters to be furnished by developer. Domestic water meter to be compound type Hersey or Badger and to have by-pass around meter. See Standard Detail W-11. Valves must be installed where water line ties into existing lines. Valve must be installed on line from County at tee with line from City. Inlet 8" valve in meter vault for development may be eliminated. Extension of water line from extension City of Winchester Main to the master meter vault to be in accordance with City standards and sepcifications. Signature Date � Z/ 4S 0 (innrt Crnigre P 0 Rnx 6ni Winrhe,�trr. Virginia 22601 n�' Phase I Westminster Canterbury Inspection Agreement It is agreed that: COUNTY of FREDERICK Building Inspections John W. Dennison - Building Official 703/662-4541 1. The Frederick County Inspections Department will issue the building, plumbing and electrical permits, charge the permit fees, perform the appropriate inspections and issue the certificate of occupancy; 2. The City Inspections Department will be involved in the plan review process, and will be provided with copies of all plans and changes by the architect for this project, with copies of all plans and changes; 3. All communications with the project owner and architect will be through the Frederick County Inspections Department. 4. The Winchester Fire Department and the appropriate Frederick County Volunteer Fire Chiefs will review, approve and inspect all plans for fire suppression systems for this project; and will test the alarm system, when completed; and that these two items will be complete and accepted by the Frederick County Building Official prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. The Winchester Fire Department and the appropriate Frederick County Fire Chiefs shall be provided by the architect with complete plans and specifications for the items mentioned in this paragraph. All correspondence with the owner/architect regarding fire systems as regulated by USBC shall be sent via the Building Official of Frederick County and Winchester. 5. No building permits shall be issued until the final site plans are approved by both City and County. 6. Final certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until all required site work in City and County is completed. Wendell L�.S e 1 d o Winchester City Manager A J91in R: Riley, Jr. Frederick County Ad inistrator 0 Cnnrf Cnnara _ P (1 Rnv A01 Vira;n;a - IIF011 R'F q(1T.TTTTOM FREDERICK COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS At a regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia held this day of , it was duly moved and seconded that the following resolution be adopted: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Virginia Department of Highways and Transportation is hereby requested to add the following road to the Secondary System of Frederick County, pursuant to Section 33.1-72.1 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended: Westminster -Canterbury Drive (formerly Frederick Mall Drive) Frederick Mall Subdivision, Virginia State Route 522 AND FURTHER BE IT RESOLVED, That the Board does guarantee the Commonwealth of Virginia an unrestricted right-of-way of 60' with necessary easements for cuts, fills, and drainage. Motion carried. A Copy Teste John R. Riley, Jr. Frederick County Administrator 0 0 HOWARD AKXKEY Es loV. If r. General Contracting, Design, Construction Management P. O. Box 2530 / Winchester, Virginia 22601 / Phone (703) 667-7700 To: Planninz and Development Dept. Frederick County 9 Court Sauare Attn Winchester, VA 22601 Date May 7, 1986 �_ * -I,/ MAY 1986 RECEIVED DEPT. Of PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Project: Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester, Inc. Subject: Emergency Access Road We are forwarding: ❑ under separate cover ® Drawings ® herewith ❑ Shop Drawings COPIES DRAWING NUMBER COMPANY DESCRIPTION OR TITLE 1 Sketch dated 4/1S/86 Ritchie Surveys As -Built Emergency Access Road Which are: ❑ Submitted for your approval ❑ Returned for correction and resubmission ❑ Approved with corrections noted ® For your files ❑ Approved for construction ❑ Proceed with fabrication and forward to us prints for our file and field use El Remarks: This sketch shows the alignment of the emergency access road as adapted to site conditions Please let us know as soon as possible if you foresee any problems with this alignment. CC: Fred Allen Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester, Inc. Very truly yours, HOWARD HOCKEY ONS, INC. B. William H. Prosser, III Member Associated General Contractors of America AS- E5Qjl-T EMERGEJVCY ACCESS ROAD WESTMINSTER OF Wl NCHES-TER, VA. SCA -E-1"4o W 1NC1-1ESTE'R��JIF�C-�1N1A /,� V�� A : 3 4-5 '00 FZ= lZ7. Z3� A = 8/.60� T 4/ 93 G= 7958' �o 3? � p3..\J / L1= 2Z� oo'oo A- 76,79 T= 38.88 C= 76.3Z �345 9y oFlo �'9 qyo r of 6 OFI l Flk" C .. U J COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development jghp. `_ r2 unrnp - Planning Urcrttnr gtepb@n A4 a ,UriSin - ilan„t., Tlirartnr 703/662-4532 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: John R. Riley, Secretary SUBJECT: Presentation by Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester DATE: October 31, 1985 Attached is a letter that was sent to adjoining property owners affected by stormwater control at the Westminster -Canterbury site. This letter advised those persons that the Planning Commission will act on the applicant's request to approve their original plan of storm water retention on the property on November 6, 1985. Also attached is the letter from Westminster -Canterbury requesting approval of their original plan of storm water retention on the property. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me. JRR/rsa Attachments 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Board of Trustees President George L. Romine Vice President John G. Goodwin Secretary Mrs. Philip B. Glaize Treasurer B. Tucker White, Jr. • • September 6, 1985 Mr. John P. T. Horne r�� J 6 789 County of Frederick ►�`L ,� Department of Planning and Development r:� 9 Court Square r�" SEP1S&5 P.O. Box 601 I3f�.. VED Winchester, VA 22601 _ DEPT, 'F F�AN.NiNQ AND ��� �t ui i4ENj Dear John: Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester wishes to _V� that we be granted time on the September 18, 1985 Planning Commission Agenda. We will be requesting a review and reconsideration of the storm drain pipeline portion of our site plan. Your office has been copied on all of our correspondence Dr. James Jackson to the residents over the past two months. To date, we Jacob L.Johnson William A. Johnston have received no written comments from the group. We Robert S. Kern have held two group meetings with the residents with Rey. David H. Knight three out of seven attending the first and two out of William H. Lawrence, Jr. seven the last. Miss Farley Massey Mrs. H. Delmer Robinson, Jr. Thomas G. Scully After our latest meeting there appears to be a three-way Mrs. George H. Smith, Jr. division of the land owners. Group One wants no part P.H. Sprenkle of the plan for numerous reasons (location, length, Mrs. John Michael Steck, Jr. construction); Group Two wants to sell us a right of Mrs. C. Ridgely White H. George White, Jr., M.D. way based on an unrecorded sub -division of their land and Group Three wants to take the path of least risk and has requested we go with our original plan of a retention/ detention pond. We feel we have made a significant effort to engage all parties in a workable agreement. However, without a collective agreement between all the residents, we are unable to meet the intent of the Commission's resolution dealing with the storm drain pipeline. Our specific request will be that the Commission amend its original resolution of June 5, 1985 on Site Plan #011- 85 to delete the portion that deals with the construction on an 18" pipeline and improvements to the two culverts downstream from the pipeline outflow. We will request that the Commission approve the retention/detention system for storm water run-off similar to our original proposal. P.O. Box 37, 35 E. Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601, Telephone (703) 665-0156 Poll Free in Virginia 1-800492-W Mr. John P. T. Horne Page 2 September 6, 1985 We have notified our architect of this meeting and anticipate that he will be in attendance to answer any technical questions on the design of the retention/detention pond. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely yours, T. Fred Allen Project Manager TFA: mi cc: G. Romine J. Goodwin R. Rouse R. Kern T. Dickinson G. Johnston C. Holcomb W. Prosser � W �STI �1►u STD - CAMTEZ5URY 8301 Robey Ave. Annandale, Va.. 22003 October 30, 1985 County of Frederick Department of Planning 9 Court Square P.C. Winchester, Virginia Dear Iir.. Riley: and Development Boc 601 22601 Thank you for informing me about the meeting on November 6, 1985, regarding Westminister—Canterbury's storm water control. We were not notified of impending pipeline and storm water retention until August 15, 1985, when I received a letter from Fred Allen.. He said he had recently discovered that we owned this land.. Several years ago, a real estate agent, Bob Plater, made a plat of our property.. He sug.-ested we divide it into 16 lots of 100' wide and approximately 20,000 square feet, when we get ready to sell the property.. He made a drawing showing these lots.. I sent the drawing to Mr.. Allen and asked him to show where the pipeline would be.. According to Kr.. Allen's_ drawing, a permanent 20' by approximately 400' easement, with a 60' construction easement, would be required for the pipeline. This part of the property is wooded, so the trees would have to be cut.. It would not be possible to build on at least three of these "future" lots.. My sister, (Margaret Krial) and I'. 'do not feel that we can grant an easement. It certainly would interfere with our plans when we get teady to sell.. In a letter dated October 9, 1985, I told mr. Allen that we would consider selling the lots needed for the pipeline to Westminister-Canterbury.. \,�23 4 5 8 4 , NflN 1986 RECEIVEII Dtw, of PLAROVA &V DEVELM" T �/ Sincerely, %) ��.6tssa!/ Lfi.�iUw Katherine Weber i • .0. County of Frederick Department of Planning 9 Court Square F.C. Winchester, Virgi::.ia and Development Boc 601 22601 8301 Robey Ave. Annandale, Va.. 22003 October 30, 1985 Dear Mr. Riley: Thank you for informing me about the meeting on !lovember 6, 1985, regarding Westminister-Canterbury's storm water control. We were not notifie4 of impending pipeline and storm water retention until August 15, 1985, when I received a letter from Fred Allen. He said he had recently discovered that we owned this land.. Several years ago, a real estate agent, Bob Water, made a plat of our property.. He suggested we divide it into 16 lots of 100' wide and approximately 20,000 square feet, when we get ready to sell the property.. He made a drawing showing these lots.. I sent t',e drawing to Mr.. Allen and asked him to show where the pipeline would be.. According to Iir, Allen's drawing, a permanent 20' by approximately 400' easement, with a 60' construction easement, would be required for the pipeline. This part of the property is wooded, so the trees would have to be cut.. It would not be possible to build on at least three of these "future" lots.. I�Sy sister, (Margaret Krial) and I do not feel that we can grant an easement. It certainly would interfere with our plans when we get ready to sell. In a letter dated October 9, 1985, I told mr. Allen that we would consider selling the lots needed for the pipeline to ;;estminister-Canterbury.. l�t1A11�A6 RECEIV DfR. OF PLA"da MM DENELWM . Ak Sincerely, Katherine Weber • W�STI�►u5T - CAMTER5URY 8301 Robey Ave. Annandale, Va.. 22003 October 30,, 1985 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 9 Court Square P.C..Boc 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Ivir.. Riley Thank you for informing me about the meeting on November 6, 1985, regarding Westminister-Canterbury's storm water control.. We were not notifie4 of impending pipeline and storm water retention until August 15, 1985, when I received a letter from Fred Allen.. He said he had recently discovered that we owned this land.. Several years ago, a real estate agent, Bob Water, made a plat of our property.. He suggested we divide it into 16 lots of 100' wide and approximately 20,000 square feet, when we get ready to sell the property.. He made a drawing showing these lots.. I sent the drawing to Mr.. Allen and asked him to show where the pipeline would be.. According to Kr.. Allen's: drawing, a permanent 20' by approximately 400' easement, with a 60' construction easement, would be required for the pipeline. This part of the property is wooded, so the trees would haze to be cut.. It would not be possible to build on at least three of these "future" lots.. My sister, (Margaret Krial) and I',do not feel that we can grant an easement. It certainly would interfere with our plans when we get keady to sell.. In a letter dated October would consider selling the Westminister-Canterbury.. \,�23 4 5 8 j NON 1966 RECEIV E� Din. of PLAN*** A &V pEVELWM 4i� 9, 1985, I told mr. Allen that we lots needed for the pipeline to Sincerely, Katherine Weber • 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development John T.P. Horne - Planning Director Stephen M. Gyurisin - Deputy Director 703/662-4532 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: John Riley, Secretary SUBJECT: Presentation by Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester DATE: October 11, 1985 Attached is a letter from Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester requesting time on your meeting of October 16, 1985 for reconsideration of the storm drain pipeline portion of their Site Plan #011-85. If you have any questions, please contact the Planning Department. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • • Attached Letter Sent TO, Mr. and Mrs. Russell 0. Hiett Sunmyside Station Winchester, VA 22601 Ms. Beatrice Fincham Sunnvslde Station Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. and Mrs. Linden B. Unger Route 2, Box 335 Winchester, VA 22601 Copies of letter sent to: K. Weber 8301 Robe\' Avenue Annandale, VA 22005 M. Crial 8301 Robe• Avenue Annandale, VA 22005 Mrs. Jacob Strowbridge Sunnvside Station Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. and Mrs. Larry A. StrowbridgE Sunnvside Station Winchester, VA 22601 'N z ofPr CF/VOF AND BfVf(pANN�C PMfNt , Board of Trustees President George L. Romine Vice President John G. Goodwin Secretary Mrs. Philip B. Glaize Treasurer B. Tucker White, Jr. Dr. James R. Jackson Jacob L.Johnson William A. Johnston Robert S. Kern Rev. David H. Knight William H. Lawrence, Jr. Miss Farley Massey Mrs. H. Delmer Robinson, Jr Thomas G. Scully Mrs. George H. Smith, Jr. P.H. Sprenkle Mrs. John Michael Steck, Jr. Mrs. C. Ridgely White H. George White, Jr., M.D. August 19, 1985 AUG 1985 PZCnEFI Veo AiVD gEVE NNINOPty NTC We wish to express our appreciation for your candor and frankness during our recent meeting. We felt that signifi- cant progressin a positive direction was obtained. Further- more, we appreciate your comments on ttie easement/agreement draft that had been previously forwarded to everyone. The pipeline does have inherent problems such as the routing, the permanent easement size, and the blastinz. All of which are as much a concern of ours as they are of yours.. We felt the basic and most important topic of our discussion revolved around the blastin- issue and the liability issues associated with that procedure. It has been difficult at best for us to define to the satisfaction of everyone what and when a hold harmless provision would be requested. It is difficult to specify partial liability ever. if such a provision exists under the law. We have wrestled with this problem and frankly have not been able to obtain a reason- able solution. We were pleased to hear the suggestion introduced that we, as a group, might be able to reconsider the construction of the pipeline. We are encouraged by this and have felt all along that the pipeline would or could add to the water problems that currently exist. On the other hand, we realize our responsibility to address your concerns and respond to the direction charted by the Planning Commission. While both alternates (pipeline or no pipeline) have their own inherent problems, we still support the idea of no pipeline for numerous reasons: o No construction on your land o No easement or right-of-way will be necessary o No disturbance of your land including septic lines or secondary drain lines. o No blasting on your property o No entry on your property to maintain/repair line P.O. Boa 37,35 E. Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601, Telephone (703) 665-0156 "Poll Free in Virginia 1-8(X)492-9463 A Page 2 August 19, 1985 While there is "no absolute guarantee" with either method, we feel that a higher degree of risk will be encountered with a pipeline for both parties. As you remember, we discussed at our meeting the possibility of trying the originally proposed retention/detention system for a while and if it did not work then install a pipeline. At first glance this appears to be the best approach to take. However, our research indicated that there are less than reliable methods for testing that would con- clude for both parties when, where and who would do what. We can appreciate your position that reserving the right to construct the pipeline be at your disposal but the path to that decision is difficult or non-existent. I realize that this all sounds cumbersome and would appear to be an attempt to get out of what we are being asked to do. I assure you that we are not attempting to avoid any of our obligations. We had hoped that the suggestion to build the retention/detention now and defer the pipeline until later could provide us both an answer to our concerns. But, it appears that it may be impossible. We would be appreciative if you would reevaluate the proposal to retain and detain storm water. This pro�yve�vear al, as you remember, would retain a five-year storm and detain a i&o storm. Water in detention would be discharged from the po a large fanned rock 'rip rap' to spread and dissipate the flow. Utilization of this procedure will provide for you: o No construction or disturbance of your land including blasting o No easements o A suitable and safe method to handle storm water runoff o Reduce potential flooding associated with pipeline if, after your analysis, this plan is unacceptable, we will have to address the pipeline issues head on. We are currently seeking to contact the additional land owners you brought to our attention. As you are aware, these two individuals will need to approve of and agree to a pipeline if it is finally decided to go in that direction. Thank you again for your time and I would appreciate hearing from you about this issue. TFA:mi cc: Mrs. Jacob Strowbridge Mr. Larry Strowbridge John Goodwin G. Romine J. Horne R. Kern Sincerely yours, T. Fred Allen Project Manager V"_ July 23, 1985 WESiMINKER CANTEPBM of"CHESn R Board of Trustees Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin, Deputy Director President County of Frederick George L. RoutineCounty of Planning and Development Vice President 9 Court Square John G. Goodwin Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester Secretary Dear Mr. Gyurisin: Mrs. Philip B. Glaize Treasurer Enclosed please find a copy of our executed agreement B. Tucker White, Jr. with Patton, Harris, Rust and Associates for the purposes of Third Party Inspections of our project now under Dr. James R. Jackson construction. These services will include inspections Jacob L. Johnson for site work. William A. Johnston Robert S. Kern Rev. David H. Knight If you have any questions or if we can be of assistance, William H. Lawrence, Jr, please call. Miss Farley Massey Mrs. H. Delmer Robinson, Jr. TSincerely yours, Thomas G. Scully Mrs. George H. Smith, Jr. P,H. Sprenkle Mrs. John Michael Steck, Jr. Mrs. C. Ridgely White T. Fred Allen H. George White, Jr., M.D. Project Manager Enclosure TFA:mi P.O. Box 37, 35 E. Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601, Telephone (703) 665-0156 Toll Free in Virginia 1-800-492-9463 0 �J Patton Harris Rust and Associates A Prolesstonal Corporation Engineers Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 10523 Main Street PO Box 901 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703 273-8700 622 Hungerford Drive Suite 8 Rockville, Maryland 20850 301 762-2220 100 South Main Street PO Box 46 Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 703 828-2616 58 South Kanawha Street PO Box1017 Buckhannon,W Va 26201 304 472-7650 J.L Patton, P E., L.S. July 16, 1985 Reply to Fairfax W.G Harris, Jr, P.E.,LS (703) 352-4120 T.D. Rust, RE E.F. Fournier, L.S C.R. Weber, P.E R.T dePolo, P E SE Frank, AICP• L S H L Baxley. Jr., P E., L.S R.A Polins. RE R A Henegar, L.S. J M Harris, RLA S.R Patnode D.D Popovich S P Clark. RE B.0 Cooper III, RE A S T. Cowen, AICP D.L Deputy, L S G E Foard. L S W M Kelly. L.S L S Saeedi P.E J W Weyant, P.E S A Young. P.E Mr. T. Fred Allen Project Manager Westminster Canterbury of Winchester P. 0. Box 37 35 E. Boscawen Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Quality Control/Quality Assurance Services for Westminster Canterbury of Winchester PHR&A F-4450-1-0 Dear Mr. Allen: Pursuant to our discussions of July 9, 1985, the firm of Patton, Harris, Rust and Associates, P.C. (PHR&A) is pleased to submit this contract for providing construction monitoring and materials testing services on the upcoming Westminster Canterbury of Winchester project. It is our understanding that the Frederick County Depart- ment of inspections and permits will require the services of a third party inspection agency to assure compliance with all State and local code requirements. This will require full-time, daily inspection services at the site, observing all elements of the work in progress, verifying that materials delivered to the site and used in the work comply with the approved plans and specifications, com- pleting daily reports and materials testing and notifying the construction representative of current status on any problems that may have developed. Based on our experience with similar projects in the area, we have assumed that the foundations will be shallow spread footings, structures will be steel columns and trusses, and pre -stress members, earthwork will include significant rock (limestone/dolomite) excavation and compacted fill. We have also assumed that the construction monitoring/testing services will include the following elements: • 0 Patton Harris Rust and Associates - Soil compaction structural fill, floor slabs. Mr. T. Fred Allen July 16, 1985 Page 2 test of all trenches, parking areas, roadway and under all concrete - Concrete testing, consisting of the making, curing and testing of concrete cylinders, air test, unit weight and slump test. - Visual inspection of all footings, floor slab areas, parking areas prior to concrete placement or asphalt paving. - Inspection of structural steel, including both visual observation and checking of all bolted connections with calibrated torque wrench. - Inspection and testing of all underground and concealed plumbing systems for compliance with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and the approved plans and specs. - Attending progress meetings, county inspection meetings, etc., as may be required. - From visual observations and contractors records, maintan set of as -built drawings for submission to architect at completion of project. To ensure a smooth operation and avoid costly time delays we propose to establish an onsite materials laboratory. It will be equipped to conduct proctor test, nuclear density testing, torque testing, and the making, capping, curing and testing of concrete test specimens. PHR&A proposes to assign Mr. Carroll R. Brown, Jr., C.P.C.A. as our project manager. He will be responsible for all aspects of our quality control effort and will report directly to you or your designated representative. If requested, he will serve as liaison between Westminster Canterbury, S.F.C.S. and County officials. We believe this involvement as a liaison will be very helpful in ensuring a smooth project, especially since he was the building official for the County and knows all the appropriate peoples, codes, procedures and regulations pertinent to the project. Such services would be billed at prevailing hourly rates. We will assign a resident project inspector, who initially will be on the site on a full time basis. He will report directly to Mr. Brown and your resident E 0 Patton Harris Rust and Associates Mr. T. Fred Allen July 16, 1985 Page 3 manager. As the project nears completion his efforts will be on an as -needed basis. Additionally, he will be assisted by our professional staff on any sophisticated or special inspection/testing requirements. On similar projects we have submitted written summaries at the conclusion of each major construction task. This approach has proved very useful to'project managers, in that it provided them a capsulized summary of field construction problems, quality assurance, test results, etc. We propose to use this approach on Westminster Canterbury. As compensation for these services we propose the following fee schedule. PROJECT FEE SCHEDULE Chief Project Inspector . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18.00/hr Additional Inspectors (if needed and requested) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 15.00/hr On -site Materials Laboratory for soils/concrete (if requested) . . . . . . . $400.00/mo Specialty (3rd party) Engineering Inspections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rate Schedule On -site soils/concrete tests (includes proctors concrete cylinders, field densities, sieve analysis) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Charge Nuclear density machine (as needed) . . . . . No Charge Per Diem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Charge Mileage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Charge Structural Steel (routine tests, e.g. torquing bolts) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . No Charge Note 1: Applicable overtime (in excess of 8 hrs/day) requested by you will be at time and one-half. 0 Patton Harris Mr. T . Fred Allen Rust and July 16, 1985 Associates Page 4 Note 2: Additional engineering, project liaison, planning, surveys, etc., will be billed in accordance with our prevailing fee schedule (see attachment for current rates). Invoices for the Scope of Work will be rendered monthly, based on the estimated percent completion of each element of the work. Payment shall be due upon receipt of the invoice. The fee schedule above is based on the prompt payment of bills and the orderly and continuous progress of the project through construction. If payment is not received within thirty (30) days of the billing date, one and one-half percent (1.5%) of the billed amount will be added for each 30 days that the bill is outstanding from the original invoice date. If any invoice is not paid within sixty (60) days of the original date, PHR&A will be entitled to stop work under this agreement until satisfactory arrangements for payment have been made. If this proposal is accepted within 60 days, the fees outlined in this proposal shall be valid until August 1, 1986. After that time, all unbilled fees will be increased to compensate for rising pay scales and other costs. Such increase shall be based on "cost of living" indexes published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Acceptance of this proposal will serve as PHR&A's notice to proceed with the Scope of Work described above. Upon written notification by the Client, PHR&A will immediately stop work on any phase or item of work which the Client may wish to suspend. This proposal represents the entire scope of services to be performed by PHR&A for this project and may only be modified in writing by the two parties. Both parties to this contract specifically agree that they shall not assign, sublet or transfer their interest in, or obligations under, this agreement without the prior written consent of the other party. Please indicate your acceptance of this agreement by signing below and returning one copy. Patton Harris Rust and Associates Mr. T. Fred Allen July 16, 1985 Page 5 We thank you for requesting this proposal and look forward to the opportunity to work with you on this project. Cordially, PATTON, HARRIS, RUST and ASSOCIATES A Professional Corporation Charles R. Weber, P. E. Carroll R. Brown, Jr., C.P.C.A. Senior Vice President Director of Inspection Services CRW/CRB/jpn Encls. Acknowledged and accepted this 1985. By: Signature Title Patton Harris Rust and Associates / 1 PATTON, HARRIS, RUST & ASSOCIATES, P.C. HOURLY RATE SCHEDULE Effective April 15, 1985 CATEGORY HOURLY RATE Senior Principals (PE, LS, AICP) $ 85.00 Senior Engineers (PE)/Surveyors (LS)/Planners (AICP)/Landscape Architects (CLA) $50.00 - $70.00 Senior Inspectors $40.00 - $50.00 Engineers (PE)/Surveyors (LS)/Planners (AICP)/ Landscape Architects (CLA) $40.00 - $50.00 Designers/Senior Technicians $30.00 - $40.00 Planners/Landscape Architects $30.00 - $40.00 Technicians $20.00 - $30.00 Inspectors $25.00 - $35.00 Drafters $25.00 - $35.00 Typists $25.00 - $30.00 Survey Parties: 2-Man $55.00 3-Man $65.00 4-Man $75.00 Delivery Services $15.00/hr. or at cost Printing Services: Paper $0.25/sq. ft. Mylar Sepia $2.00/sq. ft. Paper Sepia $1.00/sq. ft. Normal hourly rates do not apply to overtime, court -related services or expert testimony. 0 Board of Trustees President George L. Romine Vice President John G. Goodwin Secretari Mrs. Philip B. Glaize Treasurer B. Tucker white. Jr. Mr. Carroll R. Brown, Patton, Harris, Rust 10523 Main Street Fairfax, VA 22030 Dear Carroll: July 11, 1985 Jr. and Associates c JUL 19U RECEIVED DEPT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT This letter will serve as our engagement of your firm as Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester's quality control/ quality assurance/inspection service contractor. We accept the terms and conditions of your proposal as out- lined in your letter to us dated July 10, 1985. Further- more, we find the fee schedule (Attachment #2) acceptable without modification. As we discussed today, Mr. John Dennison of the Frederick Dr. James R. Jackson Jacob L. Johnson County Inspection Department has requested that a repre- William A. Johnston sentative of your firm contact him as soon as possible to Robert S.Kern discuss individual personnel that will be assigned to the Rey. David H. Knight project and to review their resumes. Mr. Dennison has William H. Lawrence, Jr. Miss Farlec Masse\ further indicated that he would require at a minimum Mrs. H. Delmer Robinson. Jr. the following items: Thomas G. Scully Mrs George H. Smith. Jr. 1. Review of shop drawings, samples and other submittals P.H. Sprenkle Mrs. John Michael Steck. Jr. of the contractor as required by the construction Mrs. C. Ridgel White contract documents as submitted for the building permit, H. George white. Jr.. M.D. and approval for conformance to the design concept. 2. Review and approval of the contractor's quality control procedures for all code required controled materials. 3. Special engineering professional inspection (third party) of various construction components to determine that the work is proceeding in accordance with the approved contract documents and V.U.S.B.C. requirements. 4. Provide periodic inspection reports, test results, shop drawings, design changes, etc., to insure code compliance. 5. Upon completion of the project, the engineer/inspector will submit a final report to the building official, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. 6. Provide complete set of AS -BUILT drawings upon completion of project. P.O. Box 37, 35 E. Boscawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601, Telephone (703) 665-0156 Toll Free in Virginia I-SM 492-9463 0 Mr. Carroll R. Brown, Jr. Page 2 0 July 11, 1985 I realize that the majority of the minimum required items listed above are already contained within the body of your letter, however, I feel it important to reiterate those here. Thank you very much; we look forward to a smooth construction period and working with your firm throughout. Sincerely yours, T. Fred Allen Project Manager TFA:mi cc: Jerry Bassler, Howard Shockey & Sons William Prosser, Howard Shockey & Sons Charles Holcomb, Sherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Robert Kern, Building Committee Chairman, Westminster -Canterbury John Dennison, Building Official, County of Frederick. Planning Department John Horne, Director of Planning, County of Frederick. Board of Trustees President George L. Romine Vice President John G. Goodwin Secretary Mrs. Philip B. Glaize Treasurer B. Tucker White, Jr. Dr. James R. Jackson Jacob L.Johnson William A. Johnston Robert S. Kern Rev. David H. Knight William H. Lawrence, Jr. Miss Farley Massey Mrs. H. Delmer Robinson, Jr Thomas G. Scully Mrs. George H. Smith, Jr. P.H. Sprenkle Mrs. John Michael Steck, Jr. Mrs. C. Ridgely White H. George White, Jr., M.D. • May 23, 1985 Mr. John T. P. Horne Director of Planning County of Frederick Planning Department 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 f. 1 MAY 1985 OF PLANT; AND OEVELOph LirT1J 0168L9�� Re: Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester Dear John: In response to the question of a median strip cross- over on Route 522 at the head of Frederick Mall Drive, Westminster -Canterbury will construct a crossover before occupancy of our project by residents. We have been advised by the State Highway Department that such a crossover is acceptable. Engineering of this project is currently being investigated. Whereas this segment of our overall project does not appear on any of our site plan documents, we request that this letter be incorporated as an integral part of our plan and commitment to construct a median strip crossover. As detail engineering documents become available, we will request approval of same from your department and the highway department. If you have any questions, please contact us. mi Sincer ly yours, �G� 4si �Romine Board of Trustees P.O. Box 37,:15 E. Boseawen Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601, Telephone (703) FiFi5-0156 Toll Free in Virginia 1-8(X)492-9463 171 is SFCSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture/Engineering/Planning May 16, 1985 Mr. John Horne Dept. of Planning & Development 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 14 West Kirk Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 344-6664 MAy�9a5 DEP�' IDEV�E�OPM�Nj. ANC < li Re: Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester Comm. No. 82058 Dear John: Enclosed please find revised Sheet No. 1 depicting three routes investigated for the off -site storm drainage line from the WCW site. Plan 'A' - We feel that Plan 'A' represents the absolute best route for the 18" storm drain. This route bypasses two culverts and discharges at an endwall below the last residence in the drainage swale. With the detention basin and the discharge point below the residences WCW feels that this solution best reduces any concern the residents have with regard to development of the WCW site and the runoff produced. Plan 'B' - This routing of the storm drainage line is a viable alternative but would require addition of pipe culverts adjacent to the two sets of existing culverts. Plan 'C' - This route for the storm drainage line is quite impract- ical for several reasons. The line does not follow the terrain and would result in deeper trenches and 'flatter' slopes on the pipe in locations. The presence of rock and trees would drastically increase the cost of installation. Blasting the rock is a major concern and although the other routes will encounter rock it will be less than this route. In summary, we contend that Plan 'A' offers the best solution to the line location, Plan 'B' is a feasible alternative and Plan 'C' is not feasible. We have also determined that an open paved ditch or on -grade pipe for any of the solutions is not feasible. If Plan 'A' or 'B' is not acceptable to the residents, then we would desire to request that Frederick County consider allowing WCW to discharge directly from the detention basin to grade. Comm. No. 82058 Page 2 May 16, 1985 If you need additional information please contact me. Sincerely, SHERERTZ, FRANKLIN, CRAWFORD, SHAFFNER �<v mzs" I r4 a Romaine Kesecker Landscape Architect RK/tl pc: Fred Allen rr (),AJ17' -01 0 0 0 SECSSherertz, Franklin, Crawford, Shaffner Architecture/Engineering/Planning April 30, 1985 Per. John Horne Director, Dept. of Planning �, Oevelopment County of Frederick, Virginia y Court Square 1.li nchester, Vi ryi ni a 2.2601 Dear John: 14 West Kirk Avenue Roanoke, Virginia 24011 (703) 344-6664 Re: 14estmi nster Canterbury of Wi ncliester Comm. No. 82058 Enclosed please find ten (10) sets of the final site plan for the above referenced project for your review. Also enclosed is a narrative that supplements the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and storm drainage calculations. Final routing of an eighteen inch diameter pipe from the detention basin to the existing stream has not been finalized. 14hen it is finalized, we shall forward that plan to you. Please note also that all roof areas shall he piped to the new storm drainage system. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me or Charlie Holcomb of this office. Sincerely, SHERERT7_, FRANKLIN, CRAHFORD, SHAFFNER Romaine K. Kesecker Landscape Architect Enclosures HAROLD C. K ING, COMMISSIONER EOGAR BACON, JON,,VII-L1. BR1.1-1 DISTRICT T. GEORGE V AUGHAN, JR„ GALAK, SALE.N DISTRICT JAMES L. DAVIDSON. JR., LYNCHBURG. LYNCHBURG DISTRICT WM M T POPP ESTER.A CHMOND, RICH.NO.VD DISTRICT RICHARD G. BRYOGES, VIRGINIA BEACH,SUFFOLK DISTRICT H.R HUMPHREYS, JR., WEEMS. FRFDERICKSBURG DISTRICT CONSTANCE R. KINC.HELOE, CULPEPER. CULPEF£R DISTRICT ROBERT W. SMALLEY. BERR'VILLE. STA UVTO.Y DISTRICT JOSEPH M. GUIFFRE. ALE%ANDRIA..VORTHERV VIRGINIA DISTRICT T. EUGENE SMITH, MCLEAN, AT LAR GF URBAV ROBERT A. OUICKE. BLACKSTONE. A T LARGE RURAL _ o1011IalI aHl. � .. yt� �'Thl T<'✓'F n COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA h �c�g5 G NON Mr. T .41 Vlr fC�`fi Project �.� 'r���m10- , 't P5 E. . Bo s7�ri"S� �� t Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Allen: DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (703) 984-4133 n August 8, 1984 OSCAR K. MABRY DEPUTY COMMISSIONER J. M. WRAY. JR, CHIEF ENGINEER J. T. WARREN DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION K W.WORRALL DIRECTOR OF FINANCE JACK HODGE ASSISTANT CHIEF ENGINEER SALLY H. COOPER DIRECTOR OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION J. G. RIPLEY DIRECTOR OF PLAU'NING AND PROGRAMMING Ref. Westminster -Canterbury of Winchester Frederick Mall Drive Frederick County As requested in your letter dated July 10, 1985 a review of the aboved reference has been made and our comments, recommendations and requirements are as follows. We do not feel the information submitted by you applies in this case. It seems to us the traffic projections you are showing are for peak hours only, which would apply in a traffic light, turning movement situation; however, pavement designs are based on total 24-hour traffic. We do feel we can give some relief as after reviewing all the literature on this subdivision, we find we have overlooked the fact the 120 residences involved were really a retirement community and as such have a drastically different traffic flow than a normal subdivision. We have recomputed the design accordingly. According to the National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report No. 187, a health care unit generates 2.7 vpd per bed a retirement community generates 3.5 vpd per dwelling. Using these figures and adding the traffic generated on the original design results in a Thickness Index requirement of 12.3. The original design had a Thickness Index of 8.8, so the additional Thickness Index requires in this case would be 3.5 which translates to two (2) inches Bituminous Concrete, Type S-10. It is understood that all depresents now existing must be patched out and all irregularities corrected before placing this two (2) inches bituminous concrete to prevent a failing pavement condition. We apologize for any confusion this oversight on our part may have caused. Sincerely, K. D . Walker Inspector For: W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer KDW/rh cc: Air. T. R. Blackburn Mr. N . K. Sparks Mr. John T. P. Horne TRL 6 Critical Erosion Areas L There are no critical erosion areas presently. Proposed storm drainage structures shall collect rainwater from roofs and the major portion of the site that is being developed and pipe it to a new detention and then released at the pre -developed to the existing stream near U.S. Rt. 52.2.. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Unless otherwise indicated, all vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control measures shall he constructed and maintained according to minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Structural Practices 1. Temporary Gravel Construction Entrance 2. Construction Road Stabilization 3. Silt Fence 4. Storm Drain Inlet Protection 5. Outlet Protection 6. Rip -rap 7. Dust Control D. Detention Basin Veqetative Practices 1. Topsoiling 2. Permanent Seeding 3. Tree Preservation and Protection Management Strategies 1. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operation may begin and end as quickly as possible. 2. The sediiiient trapping measures shall be installed as a first step in grading. 3. Permanent seeding shall follow finish grading as immediately as possible. Spe plan for seed mixture. 4. Areas that will not be disturbed shall be flagged clearly. 5. The contractor shall he responsible for installing and maintaining all erosion and sedirent control measures. Stormwater Management Calculation of runoff before and after development indicates that there will he an increase in runoff peak as a result of the addition of roof and paved areas to the site. (See attached runoff calculations). As a result of this and other offsite considerations, the Stormwater shall be detained and piped to the stream previously mentioned. H;)intAnanrA All erosion and sediment control measures shall he checked weekly, and after each significant rainfill according to recommendations of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. NARRATIVE Westmi nster Canterbury of Winchester Comm. No. 82058 Protect Oescri ati on The purpose of this project is the construction of a new long-term life care facility. The site of approximately 44 acres is located off of U.S. Rt. 522 on Frederick Mall Drive. The construction will consist of three interconnected buildings, loop road and resident and staff parking. Approximately 15 acres will be disturbed during construction. Existinq Site Conditions The site has irregular topography with elevations ranging from a high of 842 to a low of about 775. A majority of the site is forested with thick hard000ds. The remaining areas are grass covered with occasional isolated brushy areas within the grassy areas. Numerous rock outcrops occur in three well-defined belts that cross the property in a northeasterly direction. These belts are wooded and are topographically higher than the cleared, grassy areas on either side. The site is divided into three drainage areas which eventually merge to empty into a small stream near U.S. Rt. 522.. Adjacent Property Frederick Mall Subdivision borders the site to the North, land of the Darlington Subdivision borders the site to the East, Clearbrook Woolen Company borders the site to the South and private lots on Old Fort Road borders the site to the blest. Soils Two general soil horizons and one major rock unit exist over the building area. Topsoil generally blankets the entire site including the proposed access roads and parking areas. The topsoil thickness averages four to eight inches and is thicker in the forested areas except when rock outcrops. The topsoil is basically a low plastic silt with a trace of clay and organics. The bedrock surface is very irregular as a result of differential weathering. The bedrock is predominantly a hard gray limestone of the Conococheague Foundation. Interestingly enough, no groundwater was encountered during soil testing proceedings. The soils engineer indicates that there can be dramatic fluctuations in the groundwater table that are directly related to the hydrological cycles and can occur rather rapidly. He has observed a groundwater rise in the Winchester area of approximately four to ten inches within 24 hours after a four inch rainfall. Eilzburg, (703) july it. H. K. Benham, 1A AnoTrev at LcaMN17 7imshester, Virginia 21001 Dear Mr. Denham; Virginia 2282L P84-4133 13, 1934 AederiN A-11 Drive Frederiz! lr=nty .n response to the pra-!Dus crizarnOS the WesWnjsteT- Gaa=bury Devalopmern it is our 'this devolo-p-,112--: is an apartment c0ndc,'Aum COmPlax Proviling luasing, health care an-5. Dthar services Or res2lants Ito are guae=07 :stiraas. if this union- sLaujing is correct, Onz it would pppear thn wzcaptance of Frederick VA11 Driva wDuld he enOWerN frO:-' z-,2--Epoint based an our ex±OYMP PONY. is you know, this strRE: hag been r--2' this proposed davelpl- Me= was not anticipazaa when we furnAhed the 7wring design to the GavaloPer. Tlse 120 residents zmd t1a !Do unit Heal, Care Center along with tbe Pasent ParcOls will genizote at least 1500 vehfcles paT day. T'he residt of this is the existing Prornmit will :fiend to W: otranghtenad by adding En additional 4 1/2 Nclas bitmainous concrete. 0?a n-3 and a ridiag FzAaae of 1 1/2 inches :1 S-5 plant mix to coia.,iiodate the unanticipated additional traffin, Tho cost to add the nolizion, asphalt pluo jnh,jj&j,, the eA5Wn 00014ar Woull be the 70aponsibility t1'_`e of Canterbury, CorporatiaL. By: It. D, L. Cxqi:-- it, W, F. 1407741'n to. H. K. QPnO.-.- IT. John T. P. Earno Sincerely, T Resident Engiiner Keith T WIN -- Inspector K O z fL L •- DENOTES A POIN FREDERICK MALL LAND TRUST 553/489 FREDERICK MALL DRIVE /\ (60' R/ul T O N UNKNOWN PROPERTY OWNER QD TUDOR SQUARE SECTION-1 I 642/122 Cu of uINFRED O'REAR 6.00 M 2731012 S 01012'47"E 241.84 S 01'35'33"E IS5.99 \ /� �I7) S 11'07'03"E _ 94.87 S 27035'17"W 21.96 — S 11'07'03"E/ 105.00 / S 08016'57"E 133.81 —; OLD FORT SUBDIVISION 142/689 * DENOTES PROPERTY LINE HEREBY VACATED AL1H p C J. INKER, JR, CERTIFICATE No. 54-17-3 (a) 01058 "'� LAND b�k\� ai G SHEET 3 OF 6 302.30 30oT3p LOT/ 9D N 57.14*03" W \6 LOT M N 72.50'37"W ti 270.00 o, LOT I I coI 0 2.9375 AC.* 575/498 N 75042'18"W 180.12 OLD FORT ROAD i(60' R/u) I ti _16.156 AC. } 654/103 �M /rn N 74'58'22" W 509.00 26.83 AC.-* 597/ 312 597/328 MATCH LINE SEE SHEET 5 I* �w w _ U) w w En w z J 2 U F— PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY LINE VACATION ON THE PROPERTY OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER 1"-200' NOVEMBER 6. 1991 PHR&A 107 NORTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA (703)-722-4721 7194-1-0 HICKORY STREET J.P. DARLINGTON 150' R/W] SUBDIVISION 218/552 S 32•45' 57"W OAK STREET ELM STREET 9D ,' 150.00 (50' R/W) (50' R/W] \ / jC Be N'1' S i , S 32.45' 57 "W /e �•, / N\ 75.00 C f. °J•� 4B O 6• �/ 0 z n. N 57.14'03"W ��S�f O • - DENOTES A POINT 273.86 p f • O Ir, I rR Ar f 10U`1/ I VJ S 69'56'18"W 137.12 N 64.3! C N 74.58'22 ►- 509.00 S 71.20'59"W 143.33 N 36014'40"E —140.76 N 14.03' 1 1 " E 422.46 % DENOTES PROPERTY LINE HEREBY VACATED �F,NLTIf OF U C J INKER, JR. 9 CERTIFICATE No. 1 „ 54-17-3 (a) 01058 IV�J�. CpC\J✓� SHEET 4 OF 6 /ham 0 z h KATHERINE P. WEBER 324/188 14.742 AC.* 597/ 318 -IIETT \v 2� GERALD F. SMITH ,,_____-757/969 PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY LINE VACATION ON THE PROPERTY OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER. INC. GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER 1"m200' NOVEMBER 6. 1991 PHR&A 107 NORTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA (703)- 722- 4721 7194-1-0 c S 08. 16' 57 " E 133.81 i 15 S 06. 42' 58"E Y O Oc Z S 06' 43' 54" E 57.07 k�Ni OAR/ 10.00 S 12.30'48"E \jq; 8 17.15'57"E 50.29 / 120.00 CIJ - 8 15.38' 23"E--- 26.83 AC.} 92.55 , 597/ 312 •' DENOTES A POINT 12� 597/ 328 S 18.07'38"E 129.35 S 16.46' 35"E _'- b/ 128.59 � 10 I S 16.47' 18"E •�° 4.452 ACC OLD FORT SUBDIVISION 25 D� - �221/569 142/689 8 1 1.39' 10"E 9/ N 36•1 10' 59"E 38.25 S 41.48'23"E 223.71 161.81 N 84.31' 10"E 139.32 I yr a ;�N C J. JINKER, CERTICATE 54-17-3 (a) 01 � n "" LAND �� ck)--. G (Ml� I GERALD F . 'SMITH 757/969 N 07.35'37"E 132.89 PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY LINE VACATION ON THE PROPERTY OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER 1"-200' NOVEMBER 6. 1991 PHR&A 107 NORTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA (7033 - 722- 4721 SHEET 5 OF 6 7194-1-0 W r, to 14.742 AC.-* ro�0 w 597/ 318 \2S� 2 �e<. c, STY K'1 S�'• `�� HFS�R GERALD F . SMITH `'x 757/969 y � N 39'10'07" E LLJ W I684.60 4.452 AC. f S 45'52'24"E U) 221/569 32.66 W N 43'45'30"E U) 192.51 W z N 38037'32"E J 140.87 = U N 36'10'59" E F— 223.71 �yEALTIJ 0 U C J. INKER, J CERTIFICATE 1 „ 54.17-3 (a) 011 ":&J N1) 0 z 0- I • - DENOTES A POINT PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY LINE VACATION ON THE PROPERTY OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER. INC. GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER 1"-200' NOVEMBER 6. 1991 PHR&A 107 NORTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA (703) - 722- 4721 SHEET 6 OF 6 7194-1-0 � 1 �> SLT/ E VICINITY MAP 1 "= 2000' NOTES: THE PROPERTY DELINEATED ON THIS PLAT IS LOCATED ON ASSESSMENT MAP NO. 53((A)) PARCELS 52B. 63A. & 63B AND ASSESSMENT MAP NO. 53((4)) PARCEL J AND IS NOW IN THE NAME OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER. INC.. AS RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 554 AT PAGE 103(52B). DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 312(63A), DEED BOOK 221 AT PAGE 569 S DEED BOOK 597 AT PAGE 318(63B). AND DEED BOOK 575 AT PAGE 498(J) AMONG THE LAND RECORDS OF FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA & THE CITY OF WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA. 2. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT. THEREFORE, THIS PLAT MAY NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. 3. THE EXISTENCE OF VEGETATED OR TIDAL WETLANDS WAS NEITHER INVESTIGATED NOR CONFIRMED DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS SURVEY. 4. THIS PLAT HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM EXISTING LAND RECORDS AND DOES NOT, IN ANY WAY, IMPLICATE A CURRENT FIELD RUN BOUNDARY SURVEY BY PHR&A. THIS PLAT OF PROPERTY LINE VACATION OF THE PROPERTY OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER. INC. IS WITH THE FREE CONSENT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DESIRE OF THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS, PROPRIETORS. AND TRUSTEES. IF ANY. MINSTER-CANTERBU Y OF WINQKSTER, INC. ATE STATE OF VIRGINIA cI la -GOI;JN, I Y OF �'� c�k f nA"a t TO -WIT: I. _1(ttj� I�j, `\ )Ir,"YlLUI L , A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR THE STATE OF VIRGINIA AND -COUNTY OF '°I ,Oht DO EREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DAY PERSONALLY A PEARED BEFORE ME ' C fl i ( \-I�l� t � , 0 t)fj!, c- I , WHOSE NAME IS SIGNED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT DATLD 1` , " DAY OF I ) )( L)Q - I , 1991 , AND IS ACKNOWLEDGED THE SAME BEFORE ME IN MY STATE AND COUNTY AFORESAID. G I VEN UNDER BY HAND TH I S�� 1 I1 DAY OF\ i LJ LULL LA 1 991 . MY COMMISSION EXPIRES '\ U 1, 0 of I REP. I" / NOTARY PUBLIC _/ — 7 / PLAT SHOWING REDS CK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE PROPERTY LINE VACATION ON THE PROPERTY OF V,NLT$ 0 WESTM I NSTER- CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC. G' GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT U G J. I KER J FREDER I CK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 9 AND CITY OF WINCHESTER (`CAT FIrATF Na 1 "a 200' NOVEMBER 6. 1991 u-17-3 (a) 010se \J P H R a A 0 1 ANDB0IN H�T N SER E LVIRGINIA (703)—722-4721 SHEET 1 OF 6 /Ilit-I-V r F- 0 z (. C:IIRVF DATA O DELTA RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CHORD BEARING CHORD DIST. 1 77°17'26" 50.00 67.45 39.98 S 55048'06"W 62.45 2 221024'34" 40.00 154.57 105.83 S 41'42'23"E 74.83 3 41024*37" 40.00 28.91 15.12 S 48.17'36"W 28.28 W DENOTES PROPERTY LINE HEREBY VACATED RIMK[k JR 9 CE IFICATE No 54-17-3 (a) 01058 ��lFD LAND Sv¢v �0v-, ( t°�� I PLAT SHOWING PROPERTY LINE VACATION ON THE PROPERTY OF WESTMINSTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER. INC. GAINESBORO MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA AND CITY OF WINCHESTER 1"-200' NOVEMBER 6, 1991 PHR&A 107 NORTH KENT STREET WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA (703)-722-4721 SHEET 2 OF 6 7194-1-0 • M I•J AGREEMENT j The undersigned, being the property owners over whose I � li property a storm drainage pipeline is to be installed by West— minster —Canterbury of Winchester, Inc., in exchange for the i I installation of said line underground, do hereby agree to ' execute an easement agreement in the form attached at such time I ji as a plat and survey as mentioned in said easement showing the exact location of said easement which is to be in the center of I i a driveway leading south from U. S. Route 522 to the land of the undersigned. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: (SEAL) Russell 0. Hiett (SEAL) Ann B. Hiett I. (SEAL) i Beatrice E. Fincham (SEAL) Larry A. Strowbridge (SEAL) i; Jeri C. Strowbridge i; is i (SEAL) Jacob E. Strawbridge (SEAL) Cathryn G. Strowbridge (SEAL) I' Linden B. Unger (SEAL) Colleen F , Unger i i I . � I I li STATE OF VIRGINIA i, OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by i Russell 0. Hiett and Ann B. Hiett, his wife. Given under my hand this day of 1985. My Commission expires Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Beatrice E. Fincham. -- -Liuen under my hand this day of 1 9c ---- my Commission expires Notary Public i STATE OF VIRGINIA OF To —wit: is The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by ,Larry A.-Strowbridge and Jeri C. Strowbridge, his wife. is Given under-ny hand this day of 1985. i .5y Commission expires I 4 Notary Public i' i STATE OF VIRGINIA i OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Jacob E. Strowbridge and Cathryn G. Strowbridge, his wife. -2- 0 Giuen under my hand this My Commission expires _ u STATE OF VIRGINIA day or Notary Public . 1985. OF To —wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Linden B. Unger and Colleen F. Unger, his wife. Given under my hand this day of 1985. my Commission expires Notary Public -J- THIS DEED OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT made and dated this day of ; 1985, by and between RUSSELL 0. HIETT and ANN B, HIETT, his wife; BEATRICE E. FINCHAM, Single; LARRY A. STROWBRIDGE and JERI C. STROWBRIDGE, his wife; JACOB E. STROWBRIDGE and CATHRYN G. STROWBRIDGE, his wife; and LINDEN B. UNGER and COLLEEN F. UNGER, his wife; parties of the first part; and WESTMTNISTER-CANTERBURY OF WINCHESTER, INC., a Virginia corporation, party of the second part. WHEREAS, the parties of the first part are the owners of certain real estate lying and being situate in Gainesboro MasLer_aI Distric-, Frederick County, Virg;in, and WHEREAS, the party of the second part currently plans to construct a residence and health -care facility for the aged located on certain real estate that it owns situate in both the City of Winchester, Virginia, and Frederick County, Virginia, near the property of the parties of the first part; and WHEREAS, the -parties of the first part have expressed concern it tt4h the potential draiiic- of surface water onto their property as a result of the construction by the party of the second part; and WHEREAS, the party of the second part is -desirous of constructing certain facilities to hold and retain said surface water and to direct the runoff through ditches, drains or pipes frog its retainage pond across the property of the parties of the first part; and WHEREAS, the parties of t7he first part are desiroLrs of having such surface water directed downstream from their property at no cost to themselves. NOW THEREFORE, WITNESSETH: That for and in considera- Lion of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00} cash in hand paid, and further in consideration of the covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, the parties of the first part do hereby grant and convey unto the party of the second part a permanent easement twenty (20) feet in width, together with temporary construction easements ten (10) feet in width adjacent thereto on both sides, from the property currently owned by The Clearbrook Woolen Company, incorporated (to be conveyed to the party of the second part), said property being more particularly described on that certain plat and survey made by Lee A. Ebert, C,L.S., dated April 27, 1984, attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof as containing 14.742 acres. The easement conveyed -hereby shall be across the property of the parties of the first part acquired -by deeds of record in the Office of the Clerk of the -Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in tie following deed books and page numbers: (a) Geed Book 336 at Page 39; (b) Geed Book 311 at Wage 304; (c) Geed Book 336 at Page 183; (d) Geed Book 311 at rage 296; (e) Geed Book 311 at Page 360; and If) Geed Book 306 at Page 365. The easement granted hereby is more particularly described on that certain plat made by Late_ _ , 1985, attached -hereto and by reference :evade a part -hereof. The twenty (20) foot wide permanent easement-fer-ei-n conveyed grants to the party of the second part, its successors and assigns, the .perpetual risht to instal.. lay a.nd maintain surface water drainpipes, including the right to go on, over and upon the said permanent easement for the purpose of installing, Maintaining, repairing and replacing the same as needed, and the said temporary construction easements grant to the party of the second part the right to enter upon them to the extent necessary for and during the original construction, installation and laying of the said drainpipes, said temporary easements to expire upon completion of construction of the said drain lines. -2- The parties of the first part shall retain the right to use their land which is subject to the easements acquired herein in any manner which shall not interfere with the use and enjoyment of said rights by the party of the second part, The parties of the first part shall, at all times, have the right to cross over and upon the said easements and to use the surface of the easements in such manner as will neither iniure nor interfere with the construction, operation or maintenance of the drainpipes, except that no building or other structure shall be erected over said twenty (20) foot wide permanent easement unless by mutual consent of the parties or their successors. Whenever the enjoyment of its rights hereunder require the party of the second part to disturb the surface of the ground, it shall be the obligation of the party of the second part to restore the same to its condition prior to being so disturbed at its expehses. The parties hereto further agree as follows: ( I ) The easements herein granted shall be used solely for the installation, maintenance and use of a system limited to the handling or transmission of surface water runoff. (2) The system shall be located below ground level with no installation above ground except for manholes, maintenance access areas at approximately 300 foot intervals. Westminster —Canterbury, its successors, and assigns shall have the duty of maintenance for the system. (3) The parties of the first part do hereby release 3 ` the party of the second part from' any and all liability on its part or on the part of its agents, designees or contractors for the construction of saad drain line, including, but not limited to, all construction activities, including blasting or other construction methods reasonably related to the construction and maintenance of said line. WITNESS the following signatures and seals —3— (SEAL) Russell 0. Hiett (SEAL) Ann B. Hiett (SEAL) Beatrice E. Fincham (SEAL) Larry A. Strowbridge (SEAL) .Teri C. S t r o w b r i d g e (SEAL) acob E. Str owbridge CSEAL) Cathryn G. Strowbridge (SEAL) Linden E- Unger (SEAL] Colleen F. Unger STATE OF VIRGINIA OF To —wilt - The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Russell 0. Hiett and Ann B. Hiett, his wife. Given under my hand this day o; 1985, My Commission expires notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA OF To —wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Beatrice E. Fincham. -4- Given under my hand this day of 1985. My Commission expires Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA OF , To —wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Larry A. Strowbridge and Jeri C. Strowbridge, his wife. Given under my hand this day of 1985. My Commission expires Rotary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged befor-e me -by Jacob E. Strowbridge and Cathryn G. Strowbridge, Given under my hand this day of 1985. My Commission expires Notary Public STATE OF VIRGINIA OF - To —wit: , The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Linden Fs. Unger and Colleen F. Unger, his wife. Given under my hand this day of 1985. My Commission expires Notary Public —5— Board of Trustee, Presideni Georee L. Romme 17ce President John G. Goodutr, Secreron Mrs. Phiitp B Glarr: 7reasurcr B 7 ucke* White..1; I); James k .iacksol. .lacoh L Johnsor William A. Johnstot, Robert S Kerr Res Da\to H kmin. N ilttam H Lau tencc .l. N11.s F arle.\ M asm:, Mr: H Delme! Por;jon..: ihoma, (: Sculr• Mrs GeoiLv H irruv. J' P.Y. Sprenktt Mr_ jonr. X9tchac; "sect.. J: Mr_ L Rrdeeh N'nnc H C,coret N'ntte. Jr. N1 I 0 • JUIN" 9, 1985 Mr. and Mrs. Larry A. Strowbridge Sunnyside Station Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Strowbridge: As you may know from the recent Planning Commission meeting, Westminster -Canterbury plans to provide surface water storage capabilities on its tract of land in order to minimize arn_- contribution to run-off patterns existing at Sunnyside to the Southwest of U.S. 522. As part of Westminster -Canterbury's undertaking, it may be necessary to construct a drain facility or pipe for the trans- mission of surface water to the driveway east of Stinkray Motors. In connection with that construction, and the necessity for proceeding expeditiously, we would ask that both you and your spouse execute the enclosed agreement, keeping a copy for your files. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincerely yours, T. Fred Allen Project Manager Enclosure TFA:mi cc:141ohn Horne, Planning Director John Goodwin, Vice President, Westminster -Canterbury e 1'.(). BO). 37, 35 E. BoscaNven Strout. Winchestei Virgium 22601. Telephone (703) Ei65-0156 Toll Fret, it, V'irgini,t 1-3(X)-190_-94(i3 r. July 9, 1985 CNN —LEi im of C.0 u3 T Board of Trustee; Mr. and Mrs. Jacob E. Strowbridae Sunnyside Station Winchester, VA 22601 Fresiden; George L. Romin: Dear Mr. and Mrs. Strowbridae: Vice President John G. Good Air- As you may 'tmow from the recent Planning Commis=ion meeting, Westm aster -Canterbury plans to DrO,,-iae Surface Water stora2,e Secreran capabilities on its tract of "and- in order to minimize anv .N:r, Ph;hr n Gia::: contribution to run-off patterns existinc- at S=vside to th= SOi Lr7WeSt oL U.S. 522. Ireasu•rr• H i uci er «Rlt:. .,. As of Westminster -Canter urv`s undertaking, it may° be part necessa—, , to construct a drain facility or pipe for the trans- 1 JaCor. r, rn�n; . mission o: surface water to the driveway east of Stingray Motors. ke• ilc�IC �: K ;, !' In co:tnection with that cons -'ruction, and the necessity for �,::„ h :_a., Dro ee,aing expeditiously, we would ask that botth you and your spouse execute the enclosed agree-iient. keepinc a co -Dv for your Tnoma, C� P.r Spr_I 1: _ you nave any questions regarding this R1aLCOt1Lac h'irs Jon-, MIchac: tnz unaersigned. Si ncereiy' yours . T. Fred Allen Pro i ect N:ana2 er Enclosure i-. k:mn, cc: ?ors: riOrne, Pla>tning Director Jon GooaWin, Vice President, Westminster -Canterbury P C) Box 37. 35 E. Bosca,,ven Street, Winchester. Virginia 22 1. Tei Phone (703 655-015F Toll Free in Virginia 1-800492-945<i #=-cx July 9, 1955 L Of)) ' _ Boa,-d of Trustees Mr. and Mrs. Russell 0. Hiett Sunnyside Station Winchester, VA 22601 PrP51dPn' Georgr L. Romin. Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hiett: Tice PrPsiden: Jonn G G000�tr, As you may know from the recent Planning Commission meeting, Westminster -Canterbury plans to provide surface water storage J r. rPl�r Ur canapi l�ties on its tract of land in order to minimize a!-i�' Aries. It' t lilc� y, contribution run—otf patterns existing at Sunnyside to the U.S. Southwest of V . S . 522. 1 reasur?• B. ! L,C V, nn . . As part of Westminster -Canterbury's undertaking, it may be D: Jai t., :'- Jh:a.tiv" necessary to construct a drain facility or pipe for the _ Jacob L JonnSc` Transmission of surface water to tlhe dry ivewaeast Ci{ R'illiam A Johra:n-. " Robert S.Ke., Stingray !`'Motors. Rey. David F hn:_` Vrilitam H aHrenc .! + c r tn` ne^ c�i I n connection with hat ons true Lior, , an� c s _ ty for Miss Farlex i.:-as,e' c a i f e" proceecinc xpeait�ous_y, we would a tilt �tr yoi aP.d Mr: i,e:me" Rooin,O-.,.! Tnomas G Scull, your, spouse execute the enclosed agreement. KeeDin` a coFe Mrs George �mr, . for Voi.ir files. P.n Saren�,:: Mr. .lonn MLCna:. =i.. Jr T ve arn; duestions regarding i,lLiCma ter, t��ease 1 you have t , _ r - contact the Lmdersigned. Since —.el-,- Vour, cz . T . F red A11er: Project Manager Enclosure TEA :mi cc: Joan Horne, Planning Director John Goodwin, Vice President, Westminster -Canterbury 56 F' C Btu, 37. 35 E boscawen Street. Winchl.•s,r'r V�irginie 2601. Telephone (�03 6, -01 Toll Free in Virgiinu 1-500492-9463 J - V��� i d` ((4RY of Board of Trustees Ms. Beatrice E. Fincham St?nnvside Station Winchester, VA 22601 President George L. Ronrne Dear Ms. Fincham: I'tee Pres:dCn! John G. Good•::,r; As v_ ou may imow, rrohm the recent planning Commission meeting, �est;:inster-Canterbury plans to provide surface water storage Secre/arl capaoilities on its tract of land in order to minimize any Mr phil;F h Giai?e contribution to rt-of�t patterns existing at Sunnyside to the Souti west of U.S. 522. Treasure, B 'ucker ti'nitL:. "^—.s of Wes tminster-Canterbury`s undertaking, it may be D James R. Jacr.Snr. part necessary to construct a drain facility or pipe for the laceh ? John> :. transmission or" surface water to tine driveway east of Wflj;ar, P. Jonsto; Stingray Motors. Rohe-, err ti'i�,;an H La»t,n-�. J ?n connection ti-rit'L trial construction, and the necessity for M;:: rarie• Nia",` expeditiously, we would ask that you execute the Mrs H Dt-mncr ;:oo:nso:.- . proceeding enclosed agreement, keeping a copy' for Vol r f i 1.es . Thoma> G Sit;;,, Mrs. George H S-n;tt. J: 1f v_ ou have any questions regarding tniS matCer, D1eaSe contact P.H. Sorenkie Mrs John hh;cncel Stec),. I: the t Qersignec. Mrs. C. RideehWhitt, H. George Whne..j... Sincerelv yours, T . Fred Allen Project Manager Enclosure TFA:mi cc: John! Horne, Planning Director John Goodwin, Vice President, Westminster -Canterbury p.(). bo,>, 31. E Bt,scavven Street, V inchester. Virginia 22601. T eiephone M3; 665-015F Toll Free in Virginia 1-800492-9 ' E July 8, 1985 �iE Of WN �' L Board of Trustees Mr. and Mrs. Linden B. linger Route 2, Box 335 Winchester, VA 22601 Presiaen: George L. Rommn: Dear Mr. and Mrs. linger: lice Presiders John G. GoodU;r. As you may know, from the recent Planning Commission meeting - Wes tmins ter -Can ter-bur\7 plans to provide surface water storage Secretor: capabilities on its tract of land in order to minimize any Mrs Philip B G:a,zhe Lr contribution to run-off patterns existing at Sunnyside to t Southwest of U.S. 522. Treasure, As part of Westminster -Canterbury S undertaking, it may be Di. James R..lachsor. necessary to construct a drain facility or pipe for the trans- : ago^• L .iohn>or misslon Of surface Wager to the Qr1V2Way east of StingrayMotors. V.'iiiiarnn a lO.nP.stnl. Re• L'a`ic H Kn:,n in connection with that construction, and the necessity for proceeding expeditiously, we would ask that both VOu and your 1R ij. tarfo. !lh aSe`. �- spouse execute the enclosed agree-nent, keep_ng a copy for your Lei r n Dame Rnbir.<or. . files. Tnoma� c.. Sr'�l:: P.H. JniCnr.t, egardinz this at? er, pleasE contact Tf you have any questions rm Mr...ionr. Micnae. '�,eci. J- the undersigned. Mn. C Rideel% H. George ' hil- J:.. h^. I' Slncer2l,,' YOL_Y'" . Fred fired Allen t ro i ect Vlanager Enclosure i'FA : iT'ii cc: john Horne, Rlanning Director John Goodwin. Vice President, Westminster -Canterbury P.C). Bo,, 3 . 35 E Boscavven Street. Winel,ester. Virgima 22' )1. Telephone i703; 665-0156 Toll Free in Virginia 1-800492-946 0 1 0 .. ". COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/662-4532 CERTIFIED MAIL October 21, 1985 OJI Dear Please be advised that Westminster Canterbury appeared before the Frederick County Planning Commission on October 6, 1985 with reference to storm water control on and off said property and requested that their original plan of storm water retention on the property be approved. It was indicated by the applicant that they have reached an unworkable situation with reference to extending an 18" pipe through your properties, due to the fact that they are unable to obtain right-of-way easements. The Planning Commission has instructed me to inform you that they will act on Westminster Canterbury's request on November 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the 'the Board of Supervisors meeting room. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance to you in this matter. With kindest regards, I am Sincerely, 9ohn R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator JRR/dkg 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Sunnyside Residents Mrs. Jacob E. Strowbridge Sunnyside Station ✓ Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. and Mrs. Larry Strowbridge Sunnyside Station Winchester, Va 22601 c✓ Mr. and Mrs. Russell 0. Hiett, Sunnyside Station Winchester, VA 22601 Ms. Beatrice Fincham Sunnyside Station Winchester, VA 22601 Mr. and Mrs. Linden B. Unger Route 2, Box 335 Winchester, VA 22601 ✓� Mrs. Margaret Krial 2737 Calkins Road Herndon, VA 22070 Mrs. Katherine Weber % 8301 Robey Avenue Annandale, VA 22003 P 521 227 .801 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sypt� o St r t and No. P. ., State a d ZIP q e Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted liver Fee Return Roca howing to whom and ete Delivered Return Receipt Showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees $ Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE CEIMFIED 14AIL FFE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED SPTIML SERVICES. (mtwo 1 If you want this receipt postmarkedstick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address sale of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window o' hand it to your rural carrier tno extra charge 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked, suck the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article. date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt Card, Form 3811, and attach tt'to thefront 61 the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number 4. If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an 3Uth0r4Zed agent of the eddressae endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. It return receipt is requested. check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Seve this receipt and present it if you make inquiry • SENDER: Complete items 1, 2. 3, and 4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) is (check one). 1. The f911owing service requested Show to whom and date delivered .................... —Q ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —C s. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —0 (The restricted deliveryjee is charged in addition to - the return receipt jee.) TOTAL $ 33.. �ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: V ARTICLE NUMBER ❑ R�STERED ❑ INSURED P5a 26BMFIED ❑ COD ❑ EXPRESS MAIL �a /7 ^ Qb I �J wrays obtain signature of addressee or agent) e received the article described above. ATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent r DELI POSTMARK Q _ 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only it requested) 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a. EMPLOYEE'S INITIALS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP Code In the space below. Complete items 1,1, 3, and / on the reverse. • Attach to front of arllde If spate permits, otherwise affix to back of article. Endorse aAlcte "Return Recelpt Requested" adjacent to number. le . of RETURN COUM ry � TO PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, $300 ILIALMAIL hannatgg ` 0twoomil ' Of r REUERICK VIRGiAlf P. 0. Box 601 INInOsster, Virginia ttr�il� (Name of Sender) (Street or P.O. Box) (City, State, and ZIP Code) �21 2.27 .793 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Street a No. P. State a d ZIP Code Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and D e Delive Return Receipt Sho ing to hom, Date, and Address o Deli v ry TOTAL Postage and ees $ Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTIOLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS CERTIFIED MAIL FEE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIOAAt SMCE& (MiNtrwry 1 If you want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion otthe addresss,de of the article 14aving the reeeiptattached and present the amcle at a post office service window or nand t to your rura! carrier tno extra charge) 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article. date. detach and retain the receipt. and mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mad number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811, and attach Tito the front of the article by means of the gummed ends it space permits Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse'.ront of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces,on the front of this receipt, if return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry 0 SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) 1. The following service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered .................... —Q ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —C s. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —Q (The restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL 3. QpA�R�JTTICLE ADDRESSED TO: /ice 30 a2 mil?. ,Cd Lor Alt 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ❑REGISTERED ❑ INSURED— ARTICLE NUMBER Q�RERTIRED ❑ COD as 93 El "PRESS MAIL (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIGNATU ❑ Addressee ❑ Author d agent 5. DATE OF POSTMARK D�ELtIVERY .1:3)-� - 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only if request- 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a. EMPLOYEE'S INITIALS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. Complete items 1, 2, 3, and / on the reverse. Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. Endorse article 'Return Receipt Requested' adjacent to number. 04 161 RETURN WUNTY PENALTY FOR PRIVATE. USE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, $300 U� U Planning L M016WOR Of FREDEWX VIRGINIA TO F'. 0. Box 601 11koester. Wit+r,ar 2MI (Name of' Sender) (Street or P.O. Box) (City, State, and ZIP Code) -P 521 227-.800 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL E 1W pee tteverse/ Sent to Street301 N 3- P State and ZI de Zr Al Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted elivery Fe Return Race pt Sho ing to whom an Date slivered Return Receip Sho ing to whom, Date, and Addr s of Delivery AL Postage and Fees $ Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICILE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE CERRFWAIL FEE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED 8FTTML SEAVtCt trrq 1 If you went t eipt postmarkeo, stick the gummed stub on the le, h porno a address de Hof the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier mo extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article. date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 381 1, and attach rt to thefront of the article by means of lhegummed ends it space permits. Otherwise, a`ftx to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number S If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the address" endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces -on the front of this receipt. It l return receipt is requested. check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 381 1 6 Seve this receipt and present it if you make inquiry • SE[�-)ER: Complete items 1, 2; 3, and 4, Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i. The f owing service is requested (check one). 1—ow to whom and date delivered .................... -d Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —C z. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —a' (The restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to Me return receipt fee.) TOTAL S 3. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO; 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER ❑REJSTERED ❑INSURED ©C@RTIFIED ❑ COD El EXPRESS MAIL as 7 ©/ U[/ (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent i �✓ DATt OfFliELIVERY irk POSTMARK p 3 6. ADORESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only if requested) 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a EMPLOYEE'S INITIALS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS , (47 SENDER INSTRUCTIONS PENALTY FOR PRIV,%TE t USE TO AVOID PAYmF,'v1 OF POSTAGE, 63Jd Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. � sssslas�a • Complete items 1, 2, 3, and d on the reverse. U.S.MAIL 'gym • Attach to front of article it space permits, O otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. a� Drpl bl Mincing RETURN COONry OF FREDERICK. VIRGIN{A TO i P. 0. box 601 With sttf, Yirtint# ZMJ (Name of Sender) (Street or Y.O. Box) 1 � •(City, State, and ZIP Cc F--) P 521 227 .796 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) to � Str and No. P. ., St to and ZIP Code a Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Of Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showin to whom and ate Del' Bred Return Receipt Sh win owhom, Date, and Address f livery TOTAL Postage a Fees $ Postmark or Date W STICK POSTAGE STAUPS TO ARTIOU TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FFE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED DfM"M SERVICES. (rntrt" 1 It you want this receipt postrnarkeo, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the addreass de of the art.cle leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window o" hand it to your rwn caner kno extra charge) 2 It you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the articledate. detach and retain the receipt. and mail the article. 3 It you want a return receipt, write the certified -marl number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 381 i, and attach it to thetront of the article by means of the gummed ends it space permits. G*herw.se, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number 4 If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces,on the front of this receipt It i return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 381 1 6 Seve this receipt and present it if you make inquiry • SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i. The following service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered .................... =Q ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. 2. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY (The restriered delivery fee is charged in addition to Me return receipt fee.) TOTAL S 3. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER R❑""'XSTERED ❑INSURED CERTIFIED ❑ COD ❑ EXPRESS MAIL (Ahaays obtain signature of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent DATE OF DEL ERY POSTMARK 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only If mquestrd) 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a. EMPLOYEE'S Y TIALS UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE SENDER INSTRUCTIONS USE TO AVOID PAYMENT Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. OF POSTAGE, $300 • Complete Items 1,1, 3, and d on the reverse. • Attach to front of article it space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. it Plinning 6 Oe��lopKi��ij RETURN COUNTY OF FREDERICK. VIRGINIA TO �. 0. go, 60I urn �tSer, I(jr[iin4 Z2i0! I (Name of Sender) (Street or Y.O. Box) y, State, and ZIP Code) P 521 227 795 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL l INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Stet and o. T`J 7 P.O. State and 21P ode C Postage I -- $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fe Return Recei t Sho ng to whom and ate elivered Return ReceiptS o mg to whom, Date, and Addres of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees is Postmark or Date 71`A 7/ STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FOIST CLASS POiTUt CERTMED MAIL FEE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED ePTTONAL SERVICES. (twtrwo 1 It you want this receipt postmarkeo. stick the gummed st u6 on the left portion of the address sale of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window o, nand it to your rural carrier ,no extra charge) 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the articledate. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 381 '.,.and attach it to the front ut the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number 4 If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. It return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 381 1 6 Seve this receipt and present it if you make inquiry • SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, 3, and4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i. The fo owing service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered .................... —Q ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —d z. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —C (The restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) 7. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 7/0 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ❑ REGISTERED ❑ INSURED EjeFITIFiED ❑ COD ❑ EXPRESS MAIL (Ahvays obtain signatun I have received the article de SIGNATURE/, ❑ s NL s. TOTAL S ARTICLE NUMBER PSa/- aa7- 795" of addressee or agent) :ribed above. ❑ Authorized agent =mac! G. ADDRE E ADl%IESS (Only jrrqueste� 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a. EMPLOYEES INRIALS �D�,I� UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR P.^,IVATE SENDER INSTRUCTIONS USE TO AVOID PAYMEN"r Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below.OF POSTAGE, $300 Complete Items 1, 2, 3, and d on the reverse. V S C • Attach to Iront of artkte it space permits. otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article 'Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. . 9f Ptanning A DevelojW04 RETURN (*UMTY OF FREDERI'M VIRGINIA TO �. 0. Box 601 JI'M Ae3ter, Virift►ie 2MI (Marne of Sender) (. ct c{ P.O. i3ox) -- a d �• (CI e, and ZIP Code) P521 227 7919 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL a INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) ant to 4� St eet a . 3 vo P O., State and ZIP Code / f !(/ Postage $ Certified Fee J. Special Delivery Fee Restrict elivery Fee Return ReceipVD t whom and r f Return Receipt hom, Date, and Addrry TOTAL Postage and Fees $ Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE AND -CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SE'KVMT& (sastaat) 1 It you want this receipt postmarked suck the gummed stub on the left portion of the address ode of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand it to your rural carrier mo extra charge) 2. If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article, date. detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3. If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mad number and your name and address on a return receiptcard, Form 381 1, and attach it tothe front ill the article by means of the gummed ends it space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number d If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the address" endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces'on the front of this receipt. It f return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry • SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i.The �Alowing service is requested (check oae). L'J Show to whom and date delivered .................... —C ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —C 2. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —� (The restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL $ 3. ARTICLE ADDRE £D TO;, a _ _/ J7yLC� f ,f �iX . 330 dA71 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTCICLE NUMBER ❑RINSURED ERTIFIED ❑ COD ❑ EXPRESS MML as 7 - 79 (Always obtain sig of addressee or agent) I have received the is described above. SIGNATUR ddressee ❑ Authorized agent 5. YE OF POSTMARK IWI-IfERY ^ 6/ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only +f mqueste4 7. UNAOU TP,DEKER,SECgf€S � "�I;171y J1FVi la. EMPLO INITI UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE SENDER INSTRUCTIONS USE TO AVOID PAYMENT Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. OF POSTAGE, $300 • Complete Items t, 2, 3, and d on the reverse. • Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. Olt FuhninQ & DeYaIopmem RETURN WUNTY Of FREDERIM VIRG1818 TO i P. 0. Boil 601 0104031e1, Yirtinis M (Name of Sender) (Street or P.O. Box) (City, State, and ZIP Code) U. �(D P 521 227..7Q4 ' RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL t;i' INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) ant to —.. i A -,a. / P.O., Syte Vd ZIR Code $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery F Return Receipt Shyrwing to whom an Da Delivered Return Receipt wing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery 00 TOTAL Postage and Fees A 4t. Postmark or Date O O 00 rf E O w 0 ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAM CERTIFIED MAIL FEE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SEpVI & (netrwq 1 It you want this receipt ppsirnarkeo, stick the gummed stub on the left portion Of the eddreas s or of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or hand n to your rural carrier trio extra charge) 2 If you do not want this recetpi postmarked, suck the gummed stub on the left portion of ,r address side of the article. date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mall number and your name and address ort a return receipt card, Form 3811, aria attach ii to thefront of the article by means of the gummed ends If space permits 0-the-wise. affix to back of aruclo. Endorse front of articie RETURN AECF.." REQUESTED adjacent to tho number Z. If you want delivery restricted to the addresseo, or to an authorized agent of the addressee, endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipttt return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Save this receipt and present It if you make inqurtv i. Thefollowing service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivend.................... -Q ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of deliveryr.. —Q 2. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —G (17ie restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL S 7, %ice a 4. TYPE of SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER ❑ REGSTERED ❑ INSURED MAIL CDD dal - 795/ obtain signature of addres3ee or agent) I have received the article described above. tt SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent S. [a 6. ADDRESSEES ADDRESS (Only if rrquested) O T 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE 7e. EMPLOYEE'S m INITIALS 0 D r UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. • Complete items 1,1, 3, and 1 on the reverse. • Attach to front of article it space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse artkte "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. poolif RETURN COUNTY TO PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, $300 planning & Dejeidp" OF FREDERICK VIRGIp4 P. 0. Box 601 fto"laf,yirtirlit us, (Name of Sender) (Street or P.O. Box) (City, State, and ZIP Code) P 517 860 709 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) S t tq Street and No. State d ZIP Code Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees S Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE. CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAL SERVICES. (Time frrmq 1 If you want this receipt postmarked. stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window, o: hand it to your rural carrier Ino extra charge) 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick :he gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article date detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article 3 If you want a return receipt write the certified marl number and your name and address on a return receipt card, Form 3811 and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends f space permris Otherwise affix to back of article Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adfacent to the number 4' If you want delivery restricted tc the addressee, ur to an authorized agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DEl ]VERY - the front of the article 5 Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt. I+ return receipt is requested check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Save this receipt and present it if you make inquiry, ft L] COUNTY of,'FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development 703/662-4532 CERTIFIED MAIL October 24, 1985 Ms. Beatrice Fincham Sunnyside Station Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Ms. Fincham: Please be advised that Westminster Canterbury appeared before the Frederick County Planning Commission on October 6, 1985 with reference to storm water control on and off said property and requested that their original plan of storm water retention on the property be approved. It was indicated by the applicant that they have reached an unworkable situation with reference to extending an 18" pipe through your properties, due to the fact that they are unable to obtain right-of-way easements. The Planning Commission has instructed me to inform you that they will act on Westminster Canterbury's request on November 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the the Board of Supervisors meeting room. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance to you in this matter. With kindest regards, I am w onn K. Kiley, Jr. County Administrator JRR/dkg 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 P517 860 708 RECEIPT FOWURTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sentto m Street and No. P.., State and ZIP Code vG ado 7 Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees $ Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAGE, CERTIFIED MAIL FEE, AND CHARGES FOR A11Y SELECTED OPTIONAL SENVICES. (sit troaq 1 It you want this receipt postmarked, suck the gummed stub on the left portion of the address sHU of the article leaving the receipt attached and present' he article at a post office service wrr.dow o: hand it to your rural earner Ino extra charge) 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked. stick the gummed stub on the [Ott portion of Thu address side of the article date detach and retain the receipt and mail the article I It you want a return receipt write the certified mail number and your name and address On z !etur n receipt card. Form 3811 and attach it to the front of the article by means of the gummed ends 'f space permits Otherwise affix to back of arVcle Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT PEOUESTED adlacent to the number 4 If you want delrver� res:ncted tc the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DE! (VERY un the from of the article 5 Enter fees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces on the front of this receipt It return receipt is requested check the applicable blocks in hem 1 of Form 3811 6 Save this receipt and present rt if You make inqunY cc • M . Complete Items T, 2, 3, and 4. Add Your address In the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i. service Is requested (Check one) MifewIng Show to wham and date dellvercd ............. t ❑ Show to whom. dale. and address of delivery e 2. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY ........................ e flee msVkJW dolwy In Is charged /n addWer ro dr rd" reedpr lee.) TOM, t 3. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: a737 AL. 1. aVo70 4. TYPE OF SERVIC : ARTICLE NUMBER ❑ REGISTERED ❑ INSURED P5J 7 — �RTIFIED ❑COD ❑ EXPRESS MAIL O q i6 — 70,Y (Always obtain signature, addressee or agent) I have receWed the article described above SIGNATURE ❑Addressee ❑Autiwrized_aeerd 5. DATE OF ELIVERY POSTMARK ( mesas tl6c) 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (OW it Cy i 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a EMPLG;'E MMIALS a op0: twd4n7 m UNITED STATES POSTbL Sa)fI,CE. OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP We In tgeltpblle13 • Complete items 1, 2. 3, and 4 on the rtyeraf. • Attach to front of article It space permfis, otherwise affix to back of arycie • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" dlpi • adjecom to number. RETURN iil1� I �f f'Irinniri�( !� Deiitlo�SE. FOSR PRIVATE TY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA P. 0. Box 601 Winchester, Vi►Kinie 22601 (Name of Senoer) (Street or P.Q. Box) (City, State, and ZIP Code) E 1] COUNTY ,of F EDERICK CERTIFIED MAIL October 24, 1985 Mrs. Margaret Krial 2737 Calkins Road Herndon, Virginia 22070 Dear Mrs. Krial: Department of Planning and Develop ent jahntt ;F.. P— 4 ey n @ ria i si, ekw *er 703/66. 532 Please he advised that Westminster Canterbury appeared before the Frederick County Planning Commission on October 6, 1985 with reference to storm water control on and off said property and requested that their original plan of storm water retention on the property be approved. It was indicated by the applicant that they have reached an unworkable situation with reference to extending an 18" pipe through your properties, due to the fact that they are unable to obtain right-of-way easements. The Planning Commission has instructed me to inform you thiit they will act on Westminster Canterbury's request on November 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the the Board of Supervisors meeting room. _ Please contact me if I can be of further assistance to you in this matter. With kindest regards, I am Sincerely, John R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator JRR/dkg 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia 22601 �41" 521 227 804 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAI' NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDEO— NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to alo S teat and No. P. ., Stat nd ZIP C de aaU i Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees $ Postmark or Date V- J 2 E TO COVE i CERTIFIED MAIL FEE AND CMARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OPTIONAI. SEXV{CES. (z:wtr01111Q 1 It you want this receipt postmarked. Stick the gummed stuli on the left portion of the address a de of the article leaving the receipt attached and present the article at a post office service window or nand it to your rural carrier mo extra charge) 2 It you do not want this receipt postmarked. stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address aide of the article date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3 It you want a return receipt, waste the certified -matt number and your name and address o, a return receipt card, Form 381 1, and attach ti to the {rant bf the article by means of the gummed ends if space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse hunt of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number t 4 If yc r want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an acthonzed agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. f nter tees for the services requested in the appropriate spaces -on the front of this receipt. It return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Save this receipt and present n if you make ing0 • SENS: Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i. The mellowing service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered .................... —0 ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —C z. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —5 (The restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL 3. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO,. cGa „ •� 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER RRcGTERfD ❑ INSURED � n-iED ❑ COD o7oZ% ❑ EXPRESS MAIL OO (Always Obtain signature of addressee or agerM I have received th rti described above. SIGNA jA essee ❑ Authorized agent 5. DATE DELIVERY V ADDRESS if 6, ADORESSEES (Only requested) j �5 1.,, 98,E F. 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: t ' UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS P111"ur name, address, and LP Code in the space below. • Complete Items 1, Y, 3, and / on the reverse. • Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. RETURN COUNTY TO i PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, $300 ImL Planning j Dewoomsnl OF FREDMCK, VIM31A P. 0. Box 601 wincnosta.U441 (:Name of Sender) 1 (Street or P.O. Box) 40 I (City, State, and ZIP Code) I COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development T�.h . T'P : i 17 planniHg PiFe,tvr JC71'111 St ,.phe Ari Gyor-isin Tl.. otar li409W 703/662-4532 CERTIFIED MAIL October 24, 1985 Mr. and Mrs. Larry Strowbridge Sunnyside Station Winchester, Virginia. 22601 Dear Mr. and Mrs. Strowbridge: Please be advised that Westminster Canterbury appeared before the Frederick County Planning Commission on October 6, 1985 with reference to storm water control on and off said property and requested that their original plan of storm water retention on the property be approved. It was indicated by the applicant that they have reached an unworkable situation with reference to extending an 18" pipe through your properties, due to the fact that they are unable to obtain right-of-way easements. The Planning Commission has instructed me to inform you that they will act on Westminster Canterbury's request on November 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the the Board of Supervisors meeting room. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance to you in this matter. With kindest regards, I am a Sincerely, John R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator JRR/dkg 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 1MITIII r 521 227 803 RECEIPT FOR CEFYIFIEO MAIL NO INSURANCE COVEM F6$iO0IDED— NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) ent to ' t eet and No. P .' State a ZIP Code Postage $ Certified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Date Delivered Return Receipt Showing to whom, Date, and Address of Delivery TOTAL Postage and Fees $ Postmark or Date STICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COVER FIRST CLASS POSTAXIL CERTIFIED MAIL FEE. AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED EPTIML SEKVICM (tea two 1 It you want this receipt postmarkedsuck the gummed stub on the left portion of the address s,de of the art. cIe leaving the receipt attached and present theart icle at a post office service wmdov a hand it to your rura! carrier tno extra charge! 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked. suck the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article date, detach and retain the receipt, and mall the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -matt number and your name and address oa a return receipt card, Form 381 1, and aitach it to thefront bf the article by means of the gummed ends if sp411.4ermits. Otherwise, aHu to back of article. Endorse front of article RETURN RECEIPT REQUES(TED adjacent to the number 4 It yo,j ilnt delivery rettricted to the sadressee, or to an authorized agent of the address" enddrse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter teas for the ser4ices requested in the appropriate spaces -on the front of this receipt. If i return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 $eve this receipt and present it if you make inquiry • SEN6Vmplete ftems 1, 2, 3, and 4. d your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FE4S) i. The following service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered .................... —C ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. —0 z. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY —0 (The restricted delivery fee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL 3. ARTICLE ADDDRESFELD TO.. C - J�'� /.►��-lid UG• "601 Cll`ncoi�a c , 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER ❑ REGISTERED ❑ INSURED ❑ CERTIFIED ❑ COD ❑ EXPRESS MAIL (Alwea Obtain ekpwure of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIGNATURE ❑Addressee ❑ �thonized Yr3 5. DATE O DELIYERY � /� S _ R r 4 �JRjj 1 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only if requettern 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7L E OYEE'S UNITED STATES POSTAL SEfiVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE SENDER INSTRUCTIONS USE TO AVOID PAYMENT Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. OF POSTAGE, S30C • Complete items t, 2, 3, and 4 on the reverse. • Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article"Return Receipt Requested" ! P t , h1annin 3dj3cent to number. Dept, R & Dev' 010pim' gym" Y Of FREDERICK, VIRGINIA RETURN S TO P. 0. Sol 601 1►�iat;.b+>I�ter, j(11Q,intr• (Name of Sender) .ML (Street or P.O. Box) 0— l (City, State, and ZIP Code) C 0 6 COUNTY.,crf Y'REDERICY Department of Planning and Developmerl ® .ivt'•rm—TrD un-�vrr"'ro�Dlreisreri•,n�s:: ::�di Swpb®e N4, ray urisin a 703/662-453 CERTIFIED MAIL October 24, 1985 Mrs. Jacob E. Strowbridge Sunnyside Station Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mrs. Strowbridge: Please be advised that Westminster Canterbury appeared before the Frederick County Planning Commission on October 6, 1985 with reference -to storm water control on and off said property and requested that their original plan of storm water retention on the property be approved. It was indicated by the applicant that they have reached an unworkable situation with reference to extending an 18" pipe through your properties, due to the fact that they are unable to obtain right—of—way easements. The Planning Commission has instructed me to inform you that they will act on Westminster Canterbury's request on November 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the the Board of Supervisors meeting room. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance to you in this matter. With kindest regards, I am G John R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator JRR/ dkg 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 SJUSs In the "RETURN TO" space aIWAMIM p p�po@=ASTER FOR FEES) the f to Qvice is requested (check one). F- how, tdDm6W and date delivered .................... —0 �how'tmwbmt, date, and address of delivery.. —Q ICI STI;ICTED DELIVERY —� eted deliveryfee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL $ 33.. AARTICL D ESSEO TO //11. 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER [IR RED ❑ INSURED D ❑ COD ❑ EXPRESS r,,WL o?,? 7 — p O e ,;Z— (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent S. DATE OF DELIVERY POSTMARK 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (On(y if requested) 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a. EMPLOYEE'S INITIAL$ UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE i OFFICIAL BUSINESS , SENDER INSTRUCTIONS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAYMENT Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. OF POSTAGE, $aoe sst� • Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4 on the reverse. LL&N AIL. • Attach to front of article if space permits, �stalllat� o otherwise affix to luck of article. • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. �we-- Vt�. Pla"I1109 j Develoomfeim RETURN COUNTY Of FREDERICK V►RGIgL4 TO 0. Bolt 60, Winch`sik, YtrpnW 22i0Z (Name of Sender) (Street or P.O. Box) (City, State, and ZIP Code) Planning `LK CO COUNTY of FREDERICK CA 1 4 P.O. Box 601 - 9 Court Square Winchester, Virginia 22601 CLAIM CHECK N1 j. 9 3 25 91. ❑ HOLD DATE 1ST 140 Kei 2ND N 521 HETU ■ Detached from HS Form 1980��A '. F• _ -f UNUJinul OCT 22'85Ij 601t�i4.+ Mr. Albert Royston � Winchester, Virginia 22601 �l 1 �a�. _i., �—~ Wes. � i �� _� �"`� COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development -r7vr'rr'r-T.P. 14vi- e ram D er- 703/662-4532 CERTIFIED MAIL October 21, 1985 Mr. Albert Royston Sunnyside Station Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Royston: Please be advised that Westminster Canterbury appeared before the Frederick County Planning Commission on October 6, 1985 with reference to storm water control on and off said property and requested that their original plan of storm water retention on the property be approved. It was indicated by the applicant that they have reached an unworkable situation with reference to extending an 18" pipe through your properties, due to the fact that they are unable to obtain right-of-way easements. The Planning Commission has instructed me to inform you that they will act on Westminster Canterbury's request on November 6, 1985, at 7:00 p.m., in the the Board of Supervisors meeting room. Please contact me if I can be of further assistance to you in this matter. With kindest regards, I am neerely, John R. Riley County Administrator JRR/dkg 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 R�6001p-,�S-D if IR421 �AILJIL,� VOL 770 Re51Z)4-4'1 F 01 o7/71,' OAL uID( .0/- Ok' A-04- P.521 227 7q8 P7 F ;)Ra 07=1--i75FNRD MAE`- ;!0 INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverie) AA S nt to No. Lnd tat nd ZiP Cod e�Sl—,�' Postage $ Cortified Fee Special Delivery Fee Restricted Delivery Fee Return Receipt Showing to whom and Dat Deliver d Return Receipt Sho ing to Thom, Date, and Address of eliiery i 70 7 AL Postzrgs asd Fes $ Postmark or Date • SENDER: Complete items 1, 2, 3, and 4. i Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) I. The following service is requested (check one). aShow to whom and date delivered .................... ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. _Q 2. ❑ RESTRICTED DELIVERY (The restricted deliveryfee is charged in addition to the return receipt fee. ) TOTAL_ AD�DRE�SSSED TO- 3. ARTICLE ADDRESSED l TYPE OF SERVICE: ❑ REGISTERED ❑ INSURED ARTICLE NUMBER PS�� ❑IFYPPRESS MAIL CGD � 7- 799 (Ahaays obtain signature of addressee or ago* I have received the article described above. SIGNATURE ❑ Addressee ❑ Authorized agent �. GATE OF DELIVERY v - S • %� O 1 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only f rquerted) ` 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: 7a NNTIALS --�- UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE _�— OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRU E V �s osr M 300 Print your name, address, and ZIP Oe iq he sp?v Edo �.•--���•" • Complete Items t, 2, 3, an :tDn gle iWrse. > .,� • Attach t0 front of article i #race permits, otherwise affix to back of Ick. .• �� `�'� �`_ • Endorse article "Return Rec ' t RIP". 1 adjacent to number. 1140t. N Planning 0eYe4 mm RETURN 00UNN OF FREGERIC& YIRCI$L4 TO i P. 0. Boy 601 1&463ty, Virginia UOi I (Name of Sender) (Street or Y.O. BoA) (City, State, and ZIP P 521 2.27 ..797. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED — NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See Reverse) Sent to Str t and No. P O 1 State d ZIP Code �Go Postage $ �F- S'.cia' Delivery Fee Fee ERO"stricteclEDelivory Showing to Deliver Return Receipt Sh wingto om, Date, and Address f Deliv ry TOTAL Postage an F $ Postmark or Date 3'TICK POSTAGE STAMPS TO ARTICLE TO COMER FIRST CLASS ►OSTUL CERTIFIED MAIL FEE AND CHARGES FOR ANY SELECTED OMMAL SEIMCM !tntraao 1 It you want this receipt postmarked stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address de of the article leaving tho raceipt attached and present the art icie at a post office service window o, hand it to your rura carrier t^o extra charges 2 If you do not want this receipt postmarked, stick the gummed stub on the left portion of the address side of the article. date, detach and retain the receipt, and mail the article. 3 If you want a return receipt, write the certified -mail number and your name and address on a return recetptcdrd, Form 381 1, and attach i1 to the front of the an cie by means of the gummed ends it space permits. Otherwise, affix to back of article. Endorse front of artiNo RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED adjacent to the number 1_ If you want delivery restricted to the addressee, or to an authorized agent of the addressee endorse RESTRICTED DELIVERY on the front of the article 5. Enter tees for the services requested in the appropriate spaees'on the front of this receipt it return receipt is requested, check the applicable blocks in Item 1 of Form 3811 6 Seve this receipt and present it if you make inqurry UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE OFFICIAL BUSINESS SENDER INSTRUCTIONS Print your name, address, and ZIP Code in the space below. • Complete items t, 2, 3, and / on the reverse. • Attach to front of article if space permits, otherwise affix to back of article. • Endorse article "Return Receipt Requested" adjacent to number. pool. AC 1 Uri1tl TO PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE TO AVOID PAYMENT OF POSTAGE, s300 F1i1 n;lIg & 0e aftiA-JM OF FREGER0, VIRGINIA 4W P. 0. Box 601 0493.41, Virginia Zol (Name of Sender) (Street or I'.O. Box) (City, State, and '-N, Code) • SENDEW. Complete items 1. Z 3, and 4. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. (CONSULT POSTMASTER FOR FEES) i. The "wing service is requested (check one). Show to whom and date delivered .................... _..(t' ❑ Show to whom, date, and address of delivery.. _¢ s. ❑ RESTRICTED DM [VERY —� (The restricted deliveryfee is Charged in addition to the return receipt fee.) TOTAL $ 3. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: ��++ 4. TYPE OF SERVICE: ARTICLE NUMBER ❑ R ❑ INSURED psi /-- ERT)FIED ❑ COD ❑ E mmss MAIL h �7 �7 AP / — / (Always Oblaln dgnature of addressee or agent) I have received the article described above. SIG RE ❑ addressee El Authorized agent Z?" &V—el V DATE OF DELIVERY POSTMARK 6. ADDRESSEE'S ADDRESS (Only if request 7. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE 7a EMPLOYEE'S INITIALS