Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout013-08 1932-1953 Senseny Rd. - 3.93 Acres RP to B2 - Shawnee - Backfile(41 m a� Y o o v o oQ�>Lr) i � O 4 DATE I �ti NO. RECEIVED FROM �!c )� r:/�llE.'�� � ADDRESS I LaY�Se , c�' C'� `%`�vVtLY,1 otg- A J FOR R r JFOR _ . AMT OF iCASH ACCOUNT AMT. PAID t CHECK U 0678 �432--(R58 (pc5-a,-21 BY 6 REZONING TRACKING SFTEET Check List: Application Form Proffer Statement V Impact Analysis ✓ Adjoiner List DATE Fee & Sign Deposit _ Deed Plat/Survey Taxes Paid Statement Impact Model Run b a Application received/file opened O fj/ Reference manual updated/number assigned ( 0 D-base updated O Copy of adjoiner list given to staff member for verification Four sets of adjoiner labels ordered from data processing Color location maps ordered from Mapping File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary 7 O PC public hearing date ACTION: J)( o� BOS public hearing date ACTION: LL) Signed copy of resolution for amendment of ordinance, with conditions proffered [if applicable], received from County Administrator's office and given to office manager for placement in the Proffers Notebook. (Note: If rezoning has no proffers, resolution goes in Amendments Without Proffers Notebook.) 10q Action letter mailed to applicant Reference manual and D-base updated File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary (final action) I ZI q /1� File given to Mapping/GIS to update zoning map c Zoning map amended U \Bev\Common\Tracking sheets\KUtracking wpd Revised 05/09/02 L.. COIJNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 January 29, 2009 Mr. John Lewis Painter -Lewis, PLC 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Ste. 120 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: REZONING #13-08, 1932 —1953 Senseny Road PINS 55-A_-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4 and 65A-2-1-5 Dear Joluz: This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of January 29, 2009. The above -referenced application was rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (Business General), with proffers. The properties are located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road (Route 657) and Greenwood Road (Route 656), in the Red Bud Magisterial District. The proffer originally dated July 2, 2008 and revisedlaston January,) uaryand 0009, which `regardleas ss of ved as a part of this rezoning application, is unique property ownership. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted proffer statement for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this rezoning application. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy Deputy P1amling Director . MTR/bad Attachment cc: Philip A. Lemieux, Red Bud Magisterial District Supervisor Gregory Kerr and Christopher Molu1, Red Bud Magisterial District Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue Sandra Love, 503 Old Kitchen Rd., White Post, VA 22663 Kenneth and Shirley Mason, 1920 Senseny Rd., Winchester, VA 22602 Franklin Anderson III, 1948 Senseny Rd., Winchester, VA 22602 Donald Straus, 1958 Senseny Rd., Winchester, VA 22602 107 North Dent Street, Suite 202 o Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 a 0 REZONING APPLICATION #13-08 1932-1958 SENSENY ROAD Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: January 20, 2009 Staff Contact: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planning Director This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in !his zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Planning Commission: 01/07/09 Board of Supervisors: 01/28/09 Action Recommended Approval Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (Business General) with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road (Route 657) and Greenwood Road (Route 656). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Red Bud PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4 and 65A-2-1-5 PROPERTY ZONING: RP (Residential Performance) PRESENT USE: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: B2 (Business General) Use: Retail South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential East: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential West: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential B2 (Business General) Use: Residential PROPOSED USES: Commercial uses including a Pharmacy. 0 • Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road Januaiy 20, 2008 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virl4inia Department of Transportation: Email dated November 19, 2008: This email serves as a follow-up to our on -site meeting on November 5, 2008 to discuss the right turn lane off Senseny Road into CVS. Based on this meeting, VDOT is in agreement that the outer lane of the urban four lane divided road section can be used as a shared thru and right turn lane for this development. This decision was made after discussions of modifying the western entrance on Senseny to a right in only and altering the design so this movement is more channelized and unobstructed. Please note, this eliminates previous rezoning comment of requiring additional right-of-way for a dedicated right turn lane. Email dated 10/27/08: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Routes 656 and 657. These routes are the VDOT roadways which have been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is not satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2008 address transportation concerns associated with this request. We offer the following: 1) The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Senseny Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with mediai-deenter left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane as required by VDOT design standards. Additional right-of-way will be required at right turn lane(s). 2) Extend Senseny Road median to Orrick Commons intersection. 3) The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Greenwood Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane. Development needs to provide additional right-of-way dedication to accommodate future road section and right turn lane. 4) Sidewalk is shown off right-of-way and as such will not be maintained by VDOT. 5) Easements should be provided for inter -parcel connectivity to adjoining parcels. Fire Marshall: Plan approval recommended. Department of Public Works: 1. Refer to A. Site Suitability, page 1: We concur with your statement that the proposed sites are suited for rezoning to the Business General District. Based on the proposed development plan, we anticipate that all of the existing single family dwellings and associated accessory buildings will be demolished. A note should be added to the site plan to indicate that asbestos inspections and demolition permits will be required prior to demolishing these structures. 2. Refer to F. Drainage, page 5: Drainage will be a big concern for the proposed site development. Every effort should be made to divert drainage away from the residential dwellings located behind and to the south of the proposed development. It should be noted that the Department of Conservation and Recreation will require the implementation of best management practices (BMP) to manage storm runoff. The design of the stormwater management facilities should include an evaluation of an existing culvert which crosses under Senseny Road and connects to the stormwater system associated with the Orrick Commons development. It appears that this culvert is located in front of parcel 65-A-214 and could possibly be used as a discharge point for a future BMP. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: No comments. Sanitation Authority Department: The Authority has sufficient sewer and water capacity to serve this site. 0 i Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 3 1; ealth Department: The Health Department has no objection to plans for this site. It appears public water and sewer will be utilized. If any wells or septic systems are found, please contact the Health Department for proper abandonment. Winchester Regional Airport: While the proposed development lies within the airport's Part 77 surfaces and airspace, it appears that the proposed site plan should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Frederick County Public Schools: We offer no conunents. Frederick County Attorney Comments: It is my opinion that the revised Proffer Statement dated October 14, 2008 would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following: 1. Proffer 1 (GDP) — This states that the applicant proffers the GDP for the purpose of identifying, among other things, "the location of the principal site access". As such, staff should be aware that Proffer 1 speaks only to the location of "principal" site access and does not actually limit additional access to the site nor, for that matter, does it limit the type of access (e.g., whether one or more entrances are to be right -in, right -out) at any location where access other than "principal" access might be included. 2. Proffer 4 (Maximum Floor Area) — Staff should be aware that the applicant is only proffering a possible building square footage limitation and is not proffering to exclude any particular B2 uses of the site. Therefore, the rezoning, if approved, would allow the site to be used for any B2 use, with the only practical use limitation being what use(s) could be fit within the particular site, which is approximately 3.93 acres in size and fairly elongated in shape. Along related lines, I would note that the GDP, unlike some of the other items included as information in the draft rezoning package, does not actually identify the structure(s) to be built, or even building footprint(s)/location(s). Also, the provision concerning allowance of greater building square footage lacks specificity as to what if any further square footage limit would apply upon the requisite TIA finding. Staff should be aware as well that any such TIA would be conducted by a consultant of the applicant's choosing, with no apparent role for the County to address the results of the TIA. 3. Proffer 7 (Iistorical Monument) — The proffer does not state a deadline by which the applicant shall complete construction of the monument. 4. Proffer 10 (Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road) — The proffer does not state who will make the determination that the crossing is required, how the determination will be made, whether the determination must be made within a particular time frame and the time frame within which the applicant must complete the improvement following a determination of its necessity. PlanninL, Department: Please see attached Memorandum dated September 4, 2008, fi•onz Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planner. Planninjz & ZoninI4: 1) Site History In 2007, a portion of the property for which this rezoning being requested ivas subject to rezoning application RZ#11-07. This was a request to rezone 2.2 acres fi-om RP to B2 with proffers for a pharmacy. Ultimately, this application was denied by the Board of Supervisors. 0 f Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 4 Transportation concerns were identified as a significant issue at that time. -Most specifically, the impacts of the site's traffic and circulation on the intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road and particularly the left turn movement onto westbound Senseny Road. This movement was identified as creating a stacking issue that would negatively impact Greenwood Road This current request differsfrom the original request in that three additional properties have been added to the application which provides the ability for the project to access Senseny Road at the existing signalized intersection of Orrick Commons. The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephenson Quadrangle) identifies this property as being rezoned from A-2 (Agricultural General) to R-3 (Residential) with rezoning application 018-78. Subsequently, the residential zoning classifications were consolidated into the RP (Residential Performance) zoning district, the zoning which the property currently retains. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the conununity's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of conununity life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use The site is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The site is not within the limits of any small area plans in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The land use plan identifies the entire Senseny Road corridor for residential uses. However, the Plan (6-72) does call for neighborhood business uses in the vicinity of residential areas. Given this key intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road, and the existing B2 zoned properties at this intersection, developing the south eastern portion of the intersection for neighborhood commercial development, if done in a compatible manner, would be consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. While Senseny Road is not specifically a business corridor, the business design standards in the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to this application. The Plan calls for landscaping along the roadway, screening adjoining uses, and controlling the size, number and location of signs. Recently, The Frederick County Board of Supervisors approved the land use proposal for the urban areas of the County. This alternative form of land use provides a desirable choice for properties located within areas identified as potential neighborhood villages and urban centers. 0 • Rezoning #13-08—1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 5 This property is located in an area designated as a potential neighborhood village. Staff has encouraged this applications' consideration of the neighborhood village concept and the principles of new urbanism to the greatest extent practical. However, this is a not a requirement of the Comprehensive Plan, rather a choice that may be utilized by the applicant when considering the future development of a property. Regardless of the above comment, this property is located in a developing area that contains a number of established residential properties. Special consideration should be provided to ensure that the impacts to the adjacent residential properties are considered. The general policies in the existing Comprehensive Plan, which call for high quality design and compatibility between uses and housing types, need to be followed. Given the lack of details concerning the physical construction of the property, the County should be confident that the commercial use of this property will be complementary with area and adjacent residential uses. Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan designates Senseny Road as an improved major collector. This translates to a four -lane divided urban section, such as is being implemented with Warrior Drive within the Wakeland Manor development. The idealized intersection design in the Comprehensive Plan (6-15) illustrates appropriate features including raised medians with landscaping, landscaping along the edge of the right-of-way, and sidewalks. Greenwood Road adjacent to this property is designated as an improved minor collector road. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Senseny Road as a short-term designated route. The applicant is implementing the Eastern Road Plan. On Senseny Road, an additional lane is being provided, as is a raised median across the frontage of the property providing additional access management. Greenwood Road is being improved to the standard identified in the Eastern Road Plan. Site Access and design. Access to the site is proposed via a full commercial entrance at the signalized intersection of the entrance to Orrick Commons on Senseny Road, and an additional right -in only entrance on Senseny Road. This additional restricted movement on Senseny Road is further promoted with the construction of a raised median that extends from Greenwood Road to the Orrick Commons intersection at the eastern edge of the property. A controlled right -in right -out entrance on Greenwood Road is also proposed. This entrance is also further controlled by a raised median within Greenwood Road. Several access concerns that were evident in the original rezoning appear to have been addressed in this new application. The comiection to the existing Orrick signal on Senseny Road provides the ability to exit the site directly to Senseny Road rather than having all of the westbound Senseny Road traffic exit via the commercial entrance on Greenwood Road at the southern most point of their property. As noted elsewhere in this report, there was limited ability to accommodate a critical left turn westbound movement on northbound Greenwood Road at its intersection with Senseny Road. As a result, this had the potential to block access to 0 • Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 6 the property from southbound Greenwood Road. This issue was highlighted by VDOT and Staff during their review of the TIA and by the Planning Commission. 3) Site Suitability/Environment The site does not contain any enviromnental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. There are no identified areas of steep slopes, floodplains or woodlands. The property is the site of the historical Greenwood School House (DHR 434-421), one of only a few schools constructed of formed rusticated concrete block. Some other attributes of the school included a bell tower that sat on the roof as well as serving as a public school in the "Modern Expansion Era." The site has been used as a residence since the schools closure in 1942. The initial review of this application by the HRAB offered several suggestions to be considered to mitigate impacts on historic resources. Please see the attached letter dated February 26, 2007 which describes the original recommendations of the HRAB. The Applicant returned to the HRAB on April 17, 2007 and obtained their endorsement of the proposed rezoning with the construction of a historic monument to the Greenwood School House. A historical monument has been proffered by the Applicant. The construction will generally conform to the sketch included as part of this application (Exhibit 8). 4) Potential Impacts A. Transportation Traffic Impact Analysis. The updated TIA prepared for this application was based upon the development of a 12,900 square foot pharmacy, 4,000 square feet of Convenience Mart with pumps and an 8,000 square foot bank and evaluated the firnctionality of the Greenwood Road and Senseny Road intersection, the intersection of Orrick Drive and Senseny Road, and the site entrances. It was projected that the background traffic, in addition to the traffic generated by the proposed rezoning, would degrade the intersection. Transportation Program. The Applicant's transportation program seeks to address the impacts identified in the TIA. Careful consideration should be given to the transportation impacts of the request as they pertain to Greenwood Road and its intersection with Senseny Road and the Orrick intersection. Overall, the function of the intersections and the level of service is significantly improved. This is achieved through a combination of intersection improvements, roadway improvements, and the location of the site's connections to Greenwood Road and Senseny Road. The Applicant's transportation program provides for the construction of improvements to Route 656, Greenwood Road, and Route 657, Senseny Road, across both road frontages of the property. This is to include right-of-way dedication and construction generally consistent with that identified on the Generalized Development Plan and required by VDOT. As depicted on 0 • Rezoning #13-08—1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 7 the Generalized Development Plan, the proposed improvements to Senseny Road implement the County's Eastern Road Plan. Access to and from Senseny Road has been restricted to a right -in only entrance with additional median separation as identified on the Generalized Development Plan. A right in right out cormnercial entrance is proposed on Greenwood Road. The application provides for the site's comlection to the Orrick — Senseny Road intersection to occur with the initial development of the property. In relation to this issue and the request in general, the applicant has proffered to provide $25,000.00 for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 right- of-ways. The Applicant has sought to address inter -parcel circulation and access by proffering a fifty foot easement at the southeast corner of the site to allow for access for future redevelopment on the properties to the east of this parcel. Pedestrian accommodations have been provided across the properties' frontages and across Senseny Road. The provision of pedestrian accommodations at the Orrick entrance to the site and across Senseny Road in this location should be clarified B. Design Standards Particular effort should be made to provide for enhanced design of the project to facilitate improved corridor appearance and the sensitive integration of the project into the surrounding connnunity. Signage, landscaping, lighting, and building layout and form should be carefully planned to ensure that this is achieved. Such design elements should seek to exceed those provided on other similar developments (Orrick Connnons) to ensure that this project fits in with the surroundings and context of this particular location. The above could be done in context with the historical character of the property and could also recognize the location as a potential neighborhood center. B. Community Facilities The development of this site will have an impact on Fire and Rescue Services. However, it is recognized that commercial uses generally provide a positive impact on community facilities through the additional generation of tax revenue. The Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution in the amount $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services for the benefit of the Greenwood Fire and Rescue Company. Previously, this amount was $1,000.00. 5) Proffer Statement — Dated July 2, 2008, Revised October 2, 2008, January , 2008. A) Generalized Development Plan The Applicant has proffered a Generalized Development Plan for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of the proposed connnercial development; the location and form of the site access, the location of the proposed pharmacy, the location of the monument to the Greenwood School, the approximate location of inter parcel access easements, and construction improvements to Route 657 and 656. • 9 Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 8 B) Land Use The Applicant has proffered the development of up to 30,000 square feet of conunercial floor area, including the construction of a 13,225 square foot pharmacy. A five foot sidewalk has been proffered parallel to Senseny and Greenwood Roads. The building is proffered to be constructed using compatible building architectural style and materials and has limited the facades of the building to certain materials. Staff note: A specific design, including building orientation, has not been provided C) Transportation The Applicant has proffered frontage improvements on Route 656, Greenwood Road, and Route 657, Senseny Road, including right-of-way dedication and construction generally consistent with that identified on the Generalized Development Plan and required by VDOT. Access to and from Senseny Road has been provided by a full commercial entrance at the existing signal at Orrick and a restricted right -in only entrance to the west of this signalized intersection. Additional median separation is also provided along Senseny Road as identified on the Generalized Development Plan. A restricted right -in right -out commercial entrance is proposed on Greenwood Road. This entrance also has additional median separation. The Applicant has proffered to provide $25,000.00 for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 right-of-ways. The Applicant has proffered a fifty foot easement at the southeast corner of the site to allow for inter -parcel circulation and access for future redevelopment on the properties to the east of this parcel. D) Conununity Facilities The Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution in the amount $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services for the benefit of the Greenwood Fire and Rescue Company. E) Historical The Applicant has agreed to construct a monument on the site commemorating the Greenwood School. This monument will be constructed of materials from the original Greenwood School and generally conform to the sketch shown in Exhibit 8 of the rezoning application. AFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 01/07/09 PLANNING COMMISSION MELTING: This rezoning application is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, in particular, the long range transportation elements of the plan. In addition, it would appear as though the impacts associated with this request have been adequately addressed by the Applicant. Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road January 20, 2008 Page 8 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 01/07/09 MEETING: Four adjoining property owners spoke during the public comment portion of the hearing. The concerns of the property owners included the types of commercial uses planned for this site, water runoff onto their properties, increased traffic on Greenwood Road, details on the buffer to protect their privacy and safety for neighborhood children, lighting, hours of operation, and the exterior appearance of the pharmacy building. In addition to these issues, the adjoining property owner who lived across the street from the proposed site on Greenwood Road was concerned about vehicle headlights shining into her home and whether the proposed median would restrict her from making a left-hand turn out of her driveway. The applicant responded to the citizens concerns, stating that a pharmacy has been proffered and negotiations are taking place with a bank. He said stormwater management will meet State and County regulations and there will be no runoff onto adjacent properties; traffic flow has been improved with additional lanes, signalization, pedestrian crossing facilities, and execution of the County's Eastern Road Plan, particularly on Senseny and Greenwood Roads. The applicant described the proposed distance and landscaped buffer, containing a six-foot high opaque fence. In addition, he discussed the following: installation of dark -sky compliant pole lights and submission of a photometric plan; the design of the median on Greenwood Road, which will be extended as far south as possible and still allow the adjoining property owner across the street the ability to go northbound; the appearance of the pharmacy structure; and the hours of operation. Commission members asked the applicant about the possibility of eliminating uses that could potentially be noisy or cause a nuisance to the neighbors, particularly car washes. The applicant did not think there would be a problem eliminating the car wash use. Commission members also wanted to be sure that the adjoining property owner on Greenwood Road would be able to make a left-hand turn out of her driveway. Otherwise, the Commission was satisfied with the applicant's proposal for this site. PC RE'COMENDATION FOR 01/28/09 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the rezoning application with proffers for a commercial project including a pharmacy on this site and the elimination of car washes. The Applicant provided a modification to the Proffer Statement dated January 21, 2008 which eliminated Car Washes as a permitted use. In addition, the applicant added a sentence to Proffer 9, which clarified initial access to the site via the existing signal on Senseny Road prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. iI 1 i,mild �.. y ea•,.,rr<,ra, r� • ` t � �� .ar � a a L_ Mpca ¢IErtareulMn we j W - �. aaca Rerun taro• E� 657 ENyR\ lnar aaiaaw LCY[aallaa. � ' t •q 11 � `0 awn^' 'r-------,-•--M .tl.. .-`r =` a i� a ,♦ II nsaauarn,.a � „F „� rYaru'� '' � d ^ • • � • I ' T - z - �i aimaara cauaaaw •oA .-. - �-a—w---�'iuoroia�aarAlP�,ruuar.ooaweiaaa•arssn,,w•,sny�-r-On GREEN FDAy0 E- G W aa4s nk 1932 - 1958 Senseny Rd Rezoning REZ # 13 - 08 PINS: 55 - A - 196, 65A - 2 - 1, 65A - 2 - 1 - 2, 65A-2-1-3,65A-2-1-4,65A-2- 1 -5 Case Planner. \Lke Future Rt37 Bypass Zoning N12 (Industrial, General District) QREZ1308_1932-1958SensenyRd BI (Business, Neighborhood District) • MHI (Mobile Home Community District) i Buildings B2 (Business. General District) - MS (Medical Support District) -Ih Urban Development Area • B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District) 4kW RI (Residential Planned Community District) Oallik.# SN'SA — EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) • R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) — HE (Higher Education District) RA (Rural Area District) - MI (Industrial. Light District) RPIResidential Performance District) 0 75 150 300 Feet N !V I • • REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA be completed by Planning Staff: Ling Amendment Number _ Hearing Date 2 �(� Fee Amount Paid $ /D dv Date Received % BOS Hearing Date J D The_Jblloiving information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: GrOn NeVeAOPh'1cj2i- Telephone: 540 -1 as - T199 Address: M-W PVAZCL (Y- Wi n hestcryA ��Io0t 2. Property Owner (if different than above) Name: See Gt (+aC {'10� _ Telephone: Address: 3. Contact person if other than above Name: Mr. \1ohn Ley IS _Telephone: 544 - (Ap? -- Sr7q a Rainier-lew8, PLC- 4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location map Agency Comments Plat Fees _ Deed to property Impact Analysis Statement _ Verification of taxes paid Proffer Statement _ • 10 INM 2 6 2008 • 5. The Code of ViI•ginia allows us to request full diselosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Ld p I�YI el� C CCV S P Kctr ryl a 6. A) Current Use of the Property: 13) Proposed Use of the Property: a 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NIJMBER USE ZONING 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection; using road names and route numbers): he ( +C- 05�)- ei hd Crecnw OTJ (load 50 U H-Ie-CaS f C� Ct r h4 — 0 11 U 9. The following information should be provided accoi-ding to the type of rezoning proposed : Number of Units Proposed Single Family homes: — Townhorne: Multi -Family: Non -Residential Lots: Mobile Home: Hotel Rooms: Square Footage of Proposed Uses Office: Service Station: Retail: a'�, 5 �S S Manufacturing: Restaurant: Warehouse: _ Other: 10. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site Inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign Issued when this application Is submitted must be placed at the front properly line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible fronn the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its acconipanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s): _ ��— — Date: aVLj ',\/Q, eh1 — Date: Owner(s): uu c D( c�� Date: /� f ��8 Date: `� 9 0 0 Special ]Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: s �v�v.co.f't ede2 icie.Va.21 _..._..__- ..._ ........- —. _.......................... . Department of Phuming & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Phone 540-665-5651 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Name) JC. nJ rO W V e (Phone) (Address) b03 Old Udgcn 14d While 5f, VA a� t03 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of'land ("Property") eonveyed to me (us), by cleed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by a0Oto lgZ//OSG Instrument No. a00 Qa on Page /� ,and is described as / Z 00A Parccl:/9(e Lot: gj Block: 55- Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) PA, In I�,/v i �; F I i (Phone) (Address) J L_ CLLQ I- Wrety C ]r �i �1Q" Wlu ite I )i� W i ►'1GW W v� W� l To act as Illy true 811d lawful attorney -Ill -fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above -- described Property, including: INE�"'.///%� Rezoning (including proffers) M..... � — Conditional Use Permit p' U, �° F+A•. 2 — Master Development Plait (Preliminary and Final) COMMOMVEALTH �"; Subdivision OF VRGMA = Site Plait COMMISSION - N 353426 Variance or Appeal 01;31.2009.• ' ���� Comprehensive Policy Ilan TIICiIC1tIIC]lt L0/-qRY pu6��0\ — ������1nn11v4,n`�attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the clay it is Signed, or until modified. Ny( it is otherwise rescinded or In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand and seal tllisd) day of CVM969 , 200 Sicnatlu'e(s) State of Virginia, City/County of CA(P-fA�(- _ , To -wit: I, _ C*f2e5Twc .._._ 61-5Q /.G _ , a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the persori(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this�aµ day ofocr- p—, 200 My Commission Expires: �V�i� � ✓�� No al•y PnbIic Rcvlscd 3/17/08 w • Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Forth Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 2-2601 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Phone 540-665-5651 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Name) heme4 ,� 5hi rlev mcr o rl (Phone) 50-Wa - T51 (Address) V I ,-�U i�:Cl Sa—K - W of < the owners) of all those tracts o • parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), the Clerk's Office of the Cil•CUit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by �9Ci 17Y- Instrument No. on Page 8'0 7 , and is described as 6sa Parcel: _ Lot:I BAk: "Asection: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: by cleed recorded in (Name) Phi m t -r — Leny I s1 1 i f� (Phone) (Address) 0 �e I' 1 rceV Chi ride, SU1fe wi11GS�Iclr, aa? To act as my true and lawful attorney -In -fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: - V Rezoning (including proffers) \0\� 1111IN,; _ Conditional Use Permit ``��\Sj.NEo, �1'i�s%,_ Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) U: �oM NF' Subdivision .. +q •. 2 , '� COMMONWEALTH �'^„•, - Site Plan OF VIRGINIA = Variance or Appeal COMMISSION _ B 353426 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment .31.200q.. • \\� 111110T,gRy shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to hake amendments to /////mnn111,040"usly approved proffered conditions CXCept as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the clay it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or moclified. In witness thereof, I (eve) have hereto set my (our) hand and sea] this aa�t y of 6arpaEi2 , 200 g , i t Signaturc(s) State of Virginia, City/County of FhtA(:7A , To -wit: lL�6PJ _ ) a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foreg moing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowleciged the same before e in thejurisdiction aforesaid thisaj` lay ofdrrMb-, 200 . -- "�------ -- My Commission Expires: _ J /�. 3�; '026� / Notary Public Itcvisecl 3/17/08 1_ 1 Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planililig Web Site: s � � 1,o.flAecTel'ic1:.� 4 .cry _................ .._._ — Department of Planning; & Development, County of. Frederick, Virginia, 107 NortIl Dent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Pllmre 540-665-5651 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Name) FrQn�jln Audo,Will (Phone) —11-k (Address) Ig49 SCr)SCnS/ Qd. LU I (Thcs' r', VA the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by instrument No. 9 53 on Page o� �' _, and is described as Parcel: Lot: BlockSection: Subdivision; do hereby make, constitute and appoint: by cleed recorded in (Name) t�1�_I_I I�-W i � 1 �_ (Phone) �J� C� J p r I !-�. (Address) 0 �I l =( o j- ercey G i ocie, SU Je DO, wi n6o cSitr n � �? Go l To act as Illy t1'L10 alld lawful att01'llcy-Ill-fact foi- and in my (ow-) ]lame, place, and stead with full power and auth0l'lty I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: / Rezoning (including proffers) ........** ' e ''% Conditional Use Permit 2� _ Master Development Plait (Prelimiiiary and Filial) COMMONWEALTH CJIII)Cll�'1SIQII OF 'ARGINlq COMMISSION SIte Plan N 353426 Variance or Appeal 0/.31.-2009, •'' ����\ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment RY puO0G���``�\ Morney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the clay it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. Id In witness thereof, I (we) have hel'et0 set my (oui-) hand and seal thisa clay of C r0,eCe , 2008 , Signature(s) State of Virginia, City/County of r,419FA'K __ , To -wit: 1, (.'W1 5Tl/JE._ _ 1L 0/�_ a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, cet'tify that the persons) who signed to the foregoing instrument pel'Sonally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same befom me in the jurisdiction aforesaid third clay of Wro 200 g (,(J(JCA4�1. My Commission Expires: epoo � Notal')l PLIWIG Revised 3/17/08 Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virghiia Fi-edericli Planning Web Site: ��«��.c:o.ft edel icl..Va.Iry —..._ ....__._. _..... .............. _... .. ......................... - ............ ............ ... Department of Platuring & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Noi•tli petit Street, Suitc 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Plione 540-665-5651 Kiiow All Men By Those Present: That I (We (Name) DOnaO e . Sf rausx (Phone) (Address)1��8 �hSCVIL4 �d, Vyln cstcr, VA a,� «��I the owners) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by cleed recorded in the Clerk's Office of tile Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 9 -3 on Page , and is described as I Parcel: Lot: Block: section: Subdivision: do licreby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Pew in ter — LC" \N I � 1 � � (Phone) SLi(� (Address) J 1S..j r f reey Cl ro cle., SU ife DO, W i n60 c'sitr —un To act as my true and lawful attorney-iii-fact for and in my (oily) ]lame, place, and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: �11JA// Rezoning (including proffers) \\\\\\\\Sj�, x\�MIss,oN ls0'% _ Conditional Use Permit U�GO Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Filial) :4 COMMONWEALTH �'^„'; - Subdivision _ OF VIRG1'ILA _ COMMISSION - �1t0 Plait s 353426 Variance or Appeal 01.200q.•' ��� Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment IVt911In-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered miclitiOm and to make ame11dn1e11tS to previously approval proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the clay it is signed, of until it is Otherwise rescinded or modified. �C/ In witness thereof, I (we) have liereto set my ( ur) hand and seal this —t�day of __ A� 200 v� Sigilature(s) State of Virginia, City/County of �Atg64( , To -wit: a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the persons) who signed 1.0 the foregoing instrument personally appeared before nle and has acknowledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid thisi44day ol'4'cPD,e, 200g My Commission I xpires: -1. 3 �� �C}O Notary Public Revised 3/17/08 0 0 r � U • • Property Owner - 1932 -1958 Senseny Road Rezoning Property Owner Name Address Name: Sandra Love 503 Old Kitchen Road White Post, VA 22663 Name: Kenneth & Shirley Mason 1930 Senseny Road Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Franklin B. Anderson 1948 Senseny Road Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Donald E. Straus 1958 Senseny Road Winchester, VA 22602 0 1932-1958 Senseny Road Rezoni Application - #7 Adjoining Proper • Tax Map No. Ex. l 65A-2-1-6 Resii 65A-3-39 Resii 65A-3-44 Resii 65A-3-46 Resii 65A-3-48 Resii 65A-3-50 Resii 65A-3-52 Resii 65A-7-7 Resii 65A-7-8 Resii 55-A-197 Com 55-A-198 Com 55-A-197 Resii 55-A-201A Com 55-A-201 B Com • 0 0 • Adjoining Property Owners - 1932 -1958 Senseny Road Rezoning Name and Property Identification Number Address Name: Orrick Cemetery Company, Inc. 501 S. Braddock Street c/o R.W. Burks Admin. Winchester, VA 22601 Property # 55-A-201 Name: Orrick Cemetery Company, Inc. 501 S. Braddock Street c/o R.W. Burks Admin. Winchester, VA 22601 Property # 55-A-2013 Name: Stafford, Timothy V. & Mary McHale 8705 C Street Property # 55-A-197 Chesapeake Beach, VA 20732 Name: Green Sen, LLC c/o Greenwood Grocery 1893 Senseny Road Property # 55-A-198 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: TCG Management, LLC 847 Lake St. Clair Property # 55-A-194 Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Stafford Timothy V. & Mary McHale 8705 C Street Property # 65A-7-8 Chesapeake Beach, VA 20732 Name:Kerns, Kathy S. 918 Greenwood Road Property # 65A-7-7 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Shields, Robert J. & Carolyn L. 927 Greenwood Road Property # 65A-3-39 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Gum, David C. Jr. & Paige E. 3026 Woodside Road Property # 65A-3-44 Clearbrook, VA 22624 eI Na_ne: Dorgan, Michael C. Iar-P ncoxi R I--- Road Property # 65A-2-1-6 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Casey, Charles H. 775 Fox Drive Property # 65A-3-46 Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Russell, Robert W. & Kristina S. 109 Greenwood Avenue Property # 65A-3-48 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Whetzel, William A. Sr. & Angela L. 111 Greenwood Avenue Property # 65A-3-50 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Gochenour, Jeffrey R. 113 Greenwood Avenue Property # 65A-3-52 Winchester, VA 22602 14 CITY OF WIN NESTER 0 WINCHESTER �j -7 s u 0� Lj (L- > LL FUfURE < lv_:_%'cONNECTlqN SPRLlrlLa` Aj n 1932-1958 SENSENY ROAD REZONING FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA SCALE: 1"=2000' 1 DRAWN BY: RED DATE: 04-09-08JOB 00803015 1 REVISED: PAINTER—LEWIS, P.L.C. WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA VICINITY MAP • El v - t --1 I - `L. TGC Management, LLC I Q I Greenwood Sen, LLC Zoned: 82 TM# A 194 I TM# 55 A 198 Use: Commercial li Zoned: RA Use: Commercial i Stafford, Timothy I TM# 55 A 197 / Zoned: RA Use: Residential Orrick Cemetery Company, Inc. — — — — _ TM# 55 A 201A Zoned: 82 / _ Use: Commercial/Residential//T . . . . . .. .......... I / / Orrick CemeteryCompany, Inc. I �` TM # 55 A 201 B I I ..........................................\ \ aFF \ \ ` / I ". Zoned: B2 .. ... .. I I IT I I.................... : Use: Commercial/Residential ''''' . '.....''''''.....''''''..'''''.................................. f / / ...:::.......:........Zvan.e:d::P .............'................ ..i'..'.'..'..'...a'.'.......... ..............Z..�'..........'........... .'o.'�''..\-2 9Sr.................... n 55 A 1 ''''''''''''''''''''. '.'.'.'...tr.'.'.... \ o�_Q _ i. .� 1 ................ I1SP% RPsidPn'iinl.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.......n....�. S.'.'.' ..�i �:.'.'.'......... . �............. .�.� � PROPERTY REZONING TABLE II 'I I o'er do / "� Q' 3 "> o ' Q a � h .o EXISTING PROPOSED PROPOSED II I I F J � �'y o`, �� Q TAX MAP I.D. PARCEL AREA PARCEL AREA B2 ZONING I I i J � N '�, i 4 "o / 55 A 196 1.62 acres 1.61 acres 1.61 acres 65A 2 1 0.47 acres 0.45 acres 0.45 acres 65A 2 1 2 0.45 acres 0.39 acres 0.39 acres I I I i / Jj 65A 2 1 3 0.46 acres 0.47 acres 0.47 acres 65A 2 1 4 0.46 acres 0.39 acres 0.39 acres I I I I 65A 2 1 5 0.47 acres 0.42 acres 0.42 acres TOTAL AREAS: 3.93 ACRES 3.73 ACRES± 3.73 ACRES TOTAL DEDICATED R.O.W.: 0.20 ACRES± I II I II I II I 100 0 100 W%?W%iiiiii Scale 1" = 100 ft Q Z O W w n W J W F— Q a C w O OV 0 H >— Z Z W W M U) a Z O V) >W 00 L� U-) Z 5; N W 0) O N O 0 N cn N 0 L N U) a� U N M O O) 0) U � U) Ln - I N N � LLD O � C^D C O O C) LO�a N O U r- E o O U N � a H E w SURVEY: C.I.: NA nIe DRAWN BY: JOB NO.: RED 0803015 SCALE: DATE: 1 "=100.0' 04/09/08 SHEET: EXHIBIT 1 1 O PEDESTRIAN CROSO IMPROVMENTS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS 7 APPROXIMATE vIONUMENT LOCATION SENSEW RM - STATE R_ 0-W DEDICATI89J ``` _► � y t THRU AND RIGHT I TURN LANES RAISED MEDIAN PHARMACY 11 I y \ \ 2f RIGHT-IN/RIGHT-OUT \ ACCESS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS MpRimu y 9 INTERPARCEL ACCESS EASEMENT EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS 1 ORRICK COMMONS 2a R-O-W DEDICATION s 2eCOMMERCIAL ENTRANCE TRAFFIC SIGNAL ALTERATION THRU/RIGHT TURN LAN i RAISED MEDIAN 5 RIGHT -IN ONLY SIDEWALK ACCESS_ --- - — — --- - - - - - 9 INTERPARCEL ACCESS EASEMENT �I \\_50' CAT. "B" BUFFER 25' INACTIVE BUFFER 25' ACTIVE BUFFER FULL SCREEN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS 60' 0' 60' Sca e 1' = 60 ft a � J a a Q °C 0 CC LU Z W N Z W a of o 0 Lu v Go Lo W V N M Z W Q 0) M 0 W W W L Z Lu U w 0 O tY ■ ■ J O N E ■� (D N � U G5 (n N N I- cn � � • 113 N N �' -D 0 0 .0 � Cfl Q> i . (o C � W��� ���a J > �v© a) Q' c _ .;- E O N U U Q� a F- Z'� w _� Q a■ II (n Z Jw :w MEN O w SURVEY: C.I.: N/A N/A DRAWN BY: JOB NO.: RED 0803015{ SCALE: DATE: 1 "=60.0' 10/02/08 Drawing: GDP HISTORI AL PROPERTY KEY 0 PT 412 — GREENWOOD UNITED METHODIST Ld I EV_ OW 0 ���'cxcswwmoo `~ ./ *000s *zo — CARMEN nuuSE~~ 421 — GREENWOOD SCHOOL" 422 — HOUSE, nTO57 423 — oRmTHWA|TE HOUSE 1130 — KEY3ER—EDwOwsOw HOUSE" ' 1148 — BR00KLAND** 1151 — FORD—BRA|THWA|TE** 1152 — 0uTBu|LD|wG5, RT. 657 NOTE: ** INDICATES A POTENTIALLY Gi SIGNIFICANT SITE AS DENOTED BY THE RURAL LANDMARKS SURVEY REPORT OF FREDERICK COUNTY 423 41 CN CnV) (-4 Ln LLJ 00 —_ 1 MILE RADIUS FROM CENTER OF SITE LLJ LLJ CD DRAWN BY: JOB NO.: 1200 O 1200 RED 0803015 SCALE: DATE: Scale 1^ ~ 1200 ft SHEET: U EX 3 0 • REZONING APPLICATION #13-08 1932-1958 SENSENY ROAD Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: December 22, 2008 Staff Contact: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planning Director This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 01/07/09 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/28/09 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (Business General) with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road (Route 657) and Greenwood Road (Route 656). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Red Bud PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4 and 65A-2-1-5 PROPERTY ZONING: RP (Residential Performance) PRESENT USE: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: B2 (Business General) Use: Retail South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential Bast: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential West: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential B2 (Business General) Use: Residential PROPOSED USES: Commercial uses including a Pharmacy. Rezoning #13-08—1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: Email dated November 19, 2008: This email serves as a follow-up to our on -site meeting on November 5, 2008 to discuss the right turn lane off Senseny Road into CVS. Based on this meeting, VDOT is in agreement that the outer lane of the urban four lane divided road section can be used as a shared thru and right turn lane for this development. This decision was made after discussions of modifying the western entrance on Senseny to a right in only and altering the design so this movement is more channelized and unobstructed. Please note, this eliminates previous rezoning comment of requiring additional right-of-way for a dedicated right turn lane. Email dated 10/27/08: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Routes 656 and 657. These routes are the VDOT roadways which have been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is not satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2008 address transportation concerns associated with this request. We offer the following: 1) The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Senseny Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane as required by VDOT design standards. Additional right-of-way will be required at right turn lane(s). 2) Extend Senseny Road median to Orrick Commons intersection. 3) The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Greenwood Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane. Development needs to provide additional right-of-way dedication to accommodate future road section and right turn lane. 4) Sidewalk is shown off right-of-way and as such will not be maintained by VDOT. 5) Easements should be provided for inter -parcel connectivity to adjoining parcels. Fire Marshall: Plan approval recommended. Department of Public Works: 1. Refer to A. Site Suitability, page 1: We concur with your statement that the proposed sites are suited for rezoning to the Business General District. Based on the proposed development plan, we anticipate that all of the existing single family dwellings and associated accessory buildings will be demolished. A note should be added to the site plan to indicate that asbestos inspections and demolition permits will be required prior to demolishing these structures. 2. Refer to F. Drainage, page 5: Drainage will be a big concern for the proposed site development. Every effort should be made to divert drainage away from the residential dwellings located behind and to the south of the proposed development. It should be noted that the Department of Conservation and Recreation will require the implementation of best management practices (BMP) to manage storm runoff. The design of the stormwater management facilities should include an evaluation of an existing culvert which crosses under Senseny Road and connects to the stormwater system associated with the Orrick Commons development. It appears that this culvert is located in front of parcel 65-A-214 and could possibly be used as a discharge point for a future BMP. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: No comments. Sanitation Authority Department: The Authority has sufficient sewer and water capacity to serve this site. • Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 3 Health Department: The Health Department has no objection to plans for this site. It appears public water and sewer will be utilized. If any wells or septic systems are found, please contact the Health Department for proper abandonment. Winchester Regional Airport: While the proposed development lies within the airport's Part 77 surfaces and airspace, it appears that the proposed site plan should not impact operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. Frederick County Public Schools: We offer no comments. Frederick County Attorney Comments: It is my opinion that the revised Proffer Statement dated October 14, 2008 would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following: 1. Proffer 1 (GDP) — This states that the applicant proffers the GDP for the purpose of identifying, among other things, "the location of the principal site access". As such, staff should be aware that Proffer 1 speaks only to the location of "principal" site access and does not actually limit additional access to the site nor, for that matter, does it limit the type of access (e.g., whether one or more entrances are to be right -in, right -out) at any location where access other than "principal" access might be included. 2. Proffer 4 (Maximum Floor Area) — Staff should be aware that the applicant is only proffering a possible building square footage limitation and is not proffering to exclude any particular B2 uses of the site. Therefore, the rezoning, if approved, would allow the site to be used for any B2 use, with the only practical use limitation being what use(s) could be fit within the particular site, which is approximately 3.93 acres in size and fairly elongated in shape. Along related lines, I would note that the GDP, unlike some of the other items included as information in the draft rezoning package, does not actually identify the structure(s) to be built, or even building footprint(s)/location(s). Also, the provision concerning allowance of greater building square footage lacks specificity as to what if any further square footage limit would apply upon the requisite TIA finding. Staff should be aware as well that any such TIA would be conducted by a consultant of the applicant's choosing, with no apparent role for the County to address the results of the TIA. 3. Proffer 7 (Historical Monument) — The proffer does not state a deadline by which the applicant shall complete construction of the monument. 4. Proffer 10 (Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road) — The proffer does not state who will make the determination that the crossing is required, how the determination will be made, whether the determination must be made within a particular time frame and the time frame within which the applicant must complete the improvement following a determination of its necessity. PlanninIZ Department: Please see attached Memorandum dated September 4, 2008, from Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planner. Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History In 2007, a portion of the property for which this rezoning being requested was subject to rezoning application RZ#11-07. This was a request to rezone 2.2 acres fi-om RP to B2 with proffers for a pharmacy. Ultimately, this application was denied by the Board of Supervisors. Rezoning 413-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 4 Transportation concerns were identified as a significant issue at that time. Most specifically, the impacts of the site's traffic and circulation on the intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road and particularly the left turn movement onto westbound Senseny Road This movement was identified as creating a stacking issue that would negatively impact Greenwood Road. This current request differs from the original request in that three additional properties have been added to the application which provides the ability for the project to access Senseny Road at the existing signalized intersection of Orrick Commons. The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephenson Quadrangle) identifies this property as being rezoned from A-2 (Agricultural General) to R-3 (Residential) with rezoning application 018-78. Subsequently, the residential zoning classifications were consolidated into the RP (Residential Performance) zoning district, the zoning which the property currently retains. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of conununity life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living enviromnent within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use The site is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The site is not within the limits of any small area plans in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The land use plan identifies the entire Senseny Road corridor for residential uses. However, the Plan (6-72) does call for neighborhood business uses in the vicinity of residential areas. Given this key intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road, and the existing B2 zoned properties at this intersection, developing the south eastern portion of the intersection for neighborhood commercial development, if done in a compatible manner, would be consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. While Senseny Road is not specifically a business corridor, the business design standards in the Comprehensive Plan are relevant to this application. The Plan calls for landscaping along the roadway, screening adjoining uses, and controlling the size, number and location of signs. Recently, The Frederick County Board of Supervisors approved the land use proposal for the urban areas of the County. This alternative form of land use provides a desirable choice for properties located within areas identified as potential neighborhood villages and urban centers. 0 Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 5 This property is located in an area designated as a potential neighborhood village. Staff has encouraged this applications' consideration of the neighborhood village concept and the principles of new urbanism to the greatest extent practical. However, this is a not a requirement of the Comprehensive Plan, rather a choice that may be utilized by the applicant when considering the future development of a property. Regardless of the above comment, this property is located in a developing area that contains a number of established residential properties. Special consideration should be provided to ensure that the impacts to the adjacent residential properties are considered. The general policies in the existing Comprehensive Plan, which call for high quality design and compatibility between uses and housing types, need to be followed. Given the lack of details concerning the physical construction of the property, the County should be confident that the commercial use of this property will be complementary with area and adjacent residential uses. Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan designates Senseny Road as an improved major collector. This translates to a four -lane divided urban section, such as is being implemented with Warrior Drive within the Wakeland Manor development. The idealized intersection design in the Comprehensive Plan (6-15) illustrates appropriate features including raised medians with landscaping, landscaping along the edge of the right-of-way, and sidewalks. Greenwood Road adjacent to this property is designated as an improved minor collector road. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Senseny Road as a short-term designated route. The applicant is implementing the Eastern Road Plan. On Senseny Road, an additional lane is being provided, as is a raised median across the frontage of the property providing additional access management. Greenwood Road is being improved to the standard identified in the Eastern Road Plan. Site Access and design. Access to the site is proposed via a frill commercial entrance at the signalized intersection of the entrance to Orrick Commons on Senseny Road, and an additional right -in only entrance on Senseny Road. This additional restricted movement on Senseny Road is further promoted with the construction of a raised median that extends from Greenwood Road to the Orrick Commons intersection at the eastern edge of the property. A controlled right -in right -out entrance on Greenwood Road is also proposed. This entrance is also further controlled by a raised median within Greenwood Road. Several access concerns that were evident in the original rezoning appear to have been addressed in this new application. The connection to the existing Orrick signal on Senseny Road provides the ability to exit the site directly to Senseny Road rather than having all of the westbound Senseny Road traffic exit via the commercial entrance on Greenwood Road at the southern most point of their property. As noted elsewhere in this report, there was limited ability to accommodate a critical left turn westbound movement on northbound Greenwood Road at its intersection with Senseny Road. As a result, this had the potential to block access to Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 6 the property from southbound Greenwood Road. This issue was highlighted by VDOT and Staff during their review of the TIA and by the Planning Commission. 3) Site Suitability/Environment The site does not contain any environmental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. There are no identified areas of steep slopes, floodplains or woodlands. The property is the site of the historical Greenwood School House (DHR #34-421), one of only a few schools constructed of formed rusticated concrete block. Some other attributes of the school included a bell tower that sat on the roof as well as serving as a public school in the "Modern Expansion Era." The site has been used as a residence since the schools closure in 1942. The initial review of this application by the HRAB offered several suggestions to be considered to mitigate impacts on historic resources. Please see the attached letter dated February 26, 2007 which describes the original recommendations of the HRAB. The Applicant returned to the HRAB on April 17, 2007 and obtained their endorsement of the proposed rezoning with the construction of a historic monument to the Greenwood School House. A historical monument has been proffered by the Applicant. The construction will generally conform to the sketch included as part of this application (Exhibit 8). 4) Potential Impacts A. Transportation Traffic Impact Analysis. The updated TIA prepared for this application was based upon the development of a 12,900 square foot pharmacy, 4,000 square feet of Convenience Mart with pumps and an 8,000 square foot bank and evaluated the functionality of the Greenwood Road and Senseny Road intersection, the intersection of Orrick Drive and Senseny Road, and the site entrances. It was projected that the background traffic, in addition to the traffic generated by the proposed rezoning, would degrade the intersection. Transportation Program. .am. The Applicant's transportation program seeks to address the impacts identified in the TIA. Careful consideration should be given to the transportation impacts of the request as they pertain to Greenwood Road and its intersection with Senseny Road and the Orrick intersection. Overall, the function of the intersections and the level of service is significantly improved. This is achieved through a combination of intersection improvements, roadway improvements, and the location of the site's connections to Greenwood Road and Senseny Road. The Applicant's transportation program provides for the construction of improvements to Route 656, Greenwood Road, and Route 657, Senseny Road, across both road frontages of the property. This is to include right-of-way dedication and construction generally consistent with that identified on the Generalized Development Plan and required by VDOT. As depicted on Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 7 the Generalized Development Plan, the proposed improvements to Senseny Road implement the County's Eastern Road Plan. Access to and from Senseny Road has been restricted to a right -in only entrance with additional median separation as identified on the Generalized Development Plan. A right in right out commercial entrance is proposed on Greenwood Road. The application provides for the site's connection to the Orrick — Senseny Road intersection to occur with the initial development of the property. In relation to this issue and the request in general, the applicant has proffered to provide $25,000.00 for fixture transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 right- of-ways. The Applicant has sought to address inter -parcel circulation and access by proffering a fifty foot easement at the southeast corner of the site to allow for access for future redevelopment on the properties to the east of this parcel. Pedestrian accommodations have been provided across the properties' frontages and across Senseny Road. The provision of pedestrian accommodations at the Orrick entrance to the site and across Senseny Road in this location should be clarified. B. Design Standards Particular effort should be made to provide for enhanced design of the project to facilitate improved corridor appearance and the sensitive integration of the project into the surrounding community. Signage, landscaping, lighting, and building layout and form should be carefully planned to ensure that this is achieved. Such design elements should seek to exceed those provided on other similar developments (Orrick Commons) to ensure that this project fits in with the surroundings and context of this particular location. The above could be done in context with the historical character of the property and could also recognize the location as a potential neighborhood center. B. Community Facilities The development of this site will have an impact on Fire and Rescue Services. However, it is recognized that commercial uses generally provide a positive impact on community facilities through the additional generation of tax revenue. The Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution in the amount $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services for the benefit of the Greenwood Fire and Rescue Company. Previously, this amount was $1,000.00. 5) Proffer Statement — Dated July 2, 2008, Revised October 2, 2008 A) Generalized Development Plan The Applicant has proffered a Generalized Development Plan for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of the proposed commercial development; the location and form of the site access, the location of the proposed pharmacy, the location of the monument to the Greenwood School, the approximate location of inter parcel access easements, and construction improvements to Route 657 and 656. 0 0 Rezoning #13-08 — 1932-1958 Senseny Road December 22, 2008 Page 8 B) Land Use The Applicant has proffered the development of up to 30,000 square feet of commercial floor area, including the construction of a 13,225 square foot pharmacy. A five foot sidewalk has been proffered parallel to Senseny and Greenwood Roads. The building is proffered to be constructed using compatible building architectural style and materials and has limited the facades of the building to certain materials. Staff note: A specific design, including building orientation, has not been provided C) Transportation The Applicant has proffered frontage improvements on Route 656, Greenwood Road, and Route 657, Senseny Road, including right-of-way dedication and construction generally consistent with that identified on the Generalized Development Plan and required by VDOT. Access to and from Senseny Road has been provided by a frill commercial entrance at the existing signal at Orrick and a restricted right -in only entrance to the west of this signalized intersection. Additional median separation is also provided along Senseny Road as identified on the Generalized Development Plan. A restricted right -in right -out commercial entrance is proposed on Greenwood Road. This entrance also has additional median separation. The Applicant has proffered to provide $25,000.00 for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 right-of-ways. The Applicant has proffered a fifty foot easement at the southeast corner of the site to allow for inter -parcel circulation and access for future redevelopment on the properties to the east of this parcel. D) Community Facilities The Applicant has proffered a monetary contribution in the amount $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services for the benefit of the Greenwood Fire and Rescue Company. E) Historical The Applicant has agreed to construct a monument on the site commemorating the Greenwood School. This monument will be constructed of materials from the original Greenwood School and generally conform to the sketch shown in Exhibit 8 of the rezoning application. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 01/07/09 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This rezoning application is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, in particular, the long range transportation elements of the plan. In addition, it would appear as though the impacts associated with this request have been adequately addressed by the Applicant. A recommendation by the Planning Commission to the Board of Supervisors concerning this rezoning application would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. 0 AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 7, 2009 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 28, 2009 Q APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING #13-08 OF 1932 - 1958 SENSENY ROAD PHARMACY WHEREAS, Rezoning M13-08 of 1932 - 1958 Senseny Road Pharmacy, submitted by Painter -Lewis, PLC, to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District, with proffers dated July 2, 2008 with last revision date of January 21, 2009, for a Commercial Project that may include a Pharmacy, was considered. The properties are located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road (Route 665) and Greenwood Road (Route 656), in the Red Bud Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, and 65A-2-1-5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 7, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 28, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District for a Commercial Project that may included a Pharmacy, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDR) S903-09 • n U This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 28th day of January, 2009 by the following recorded rote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Gary W. Dove Gene E. Fisher Philip A. Lemieux PDKES#03-09 Gary A. Lofton Aye Aye Bill M. Ewing - Aye Aye Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. y Aye_.. A COPY ATTEST r John R' Riley, Jr. FredeiKk County Administrator 0 1] 1932- 958 8enseny Road Proffer Statement Rezoning #: Property: 3.93 acres PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Recorded Owner: Sandra Love, Power of Attorney, Kenneth L. & Shirley B. Mason, Franklin B. Anderson, Donald E. Strauss Applicant: Mr. David Ervin Ervin Development Corporation 1830 Plaza Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name: Original Date of Proffers: Revision Date(s): Ervin Development Corporation 1932-1958 Senseny Road July 2, 2008 October 2, 2008 December 22, 2008 January 21, 2009 Prepared by: PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel.: (540) 662-5792 email: office@painterlewis.com Job Number: 00803015 • • PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, the undersigned applicant proffers that in the event that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County shall approve Rezoning Application # /3-09' for the rezoning of parcels TM#'s 55-A-196, 65A-2-1,65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 from RP to B2, the use and development of the subject property shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions set forth in this proffer except to the extent that such conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such are approved by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the Code of Virginia and the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. These proffers shall be binding on the owner and their legal successors or assigns. PROFFERS 1.) Generalized Development Plan The applicant agrees to proffer the Generalized Development Plan (GDP) dated 10/02/08, identified as "1932-1958 Senseny Road" and which is attached to the proffer statement, for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of the proposed commercial development, the location and form of the site access, the location of the proposed pharmacy, the location of a monument to the Greenwood School, the approximate location of interparcel access easements, and construction improvements to Route 657 and Route 656. Please refer to the attached drawing named "GDP". 2.) Improvements to Route 657 and Route 656 The applicant will make the necessary road frontage improvements, as required by the Virginia Department of Transportation, to Route 657 (Senseny Road) and Route 656 (Greenwood Road) in support of the proposed development. The improvements will be designed and submitted for approval to the Virginia Department of Transportation and Frederick County during the site plan review process. The improvements will include: a) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 657. The dedication will include approximately 7' parallel to the existing right of way along the full frontage of the site to provide a total right of way width of 80'; b) The design and construction of a right turn/ through lane eastbound on Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; c) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 656. The dedication will include approximately 3,300 square feet sufficient for the installation of additional lanes on Route 656 along the frontage of the site. d) The design and construction of a through lane and right turn lane northbound on Route 656 at its intersection with Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; e) The design and construction of a full access commercial entrance aligning with the existing entrance to Orrick Commons and the required alterations to the existing traffic signal as required by VDOT. f) The design and construction of a right-in/right-out commercial entrance on Greenwood Road. g) The design and construction of a right -in only commercial entrance on Senseny Road. page 2 L_J • PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I D's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 3.) Monetary Contribution to Frederick County Service Organizations The applicant will donate or will cause to be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County for the benefit of the Greenwood Community Fire and Rescue Company the sum of $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services. This sum will be paid upon the receipt of the first building permit issued for the site, subsequent to the approval of this rezoning. 4.) Maximum Floor Area The applicant agrees to limit the gross commercial floor area that will be built on the 3.93 acres to 30,000 square feet. The amount of commercial area to be built will be determined through the site plan review process. 5.) Design Features The applicant agrees to construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk running parallel with Route 657 and Route 656. The sidewalk will be maintained by the property owner(s). The sidewalk will be completed prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 6.) Monetary Contributions The applicant agrees to provide $25,000.00, for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 rights -of -way. This sum will be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 7.) Historical Monument The applicant agrees to construct a monument on the site commemorating the Greenwood School prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site. The monument will be constructed of materials from the original Greenwood School and generally conform to the sketch shown on the attached drawing titled "Greenwood School Monument" and dated April 13, 2007. The approximate location of the monument is shown on the Generalized Development Plan. The maintenance and upkeep of the monument will be the responsibility of the property owner. 8.) Building Design The proposed buildings shall be constructed using compatible architectural styles and materials. Design elements shall be compatible with Frederick County and will respect the continuity and character of the existing architectural fabric of the surrounding community. The principal fagade in addition to any fagade fronting Senseny Road and/or Greenwood Road shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco, or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. Metal panels shall be prohibited as a construction material for buildings. page 3 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I D's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 9.) Inter -parcel Circulation and Access The applicant agrees to provide access easements which will permit access through the site from all points of right of way access throughout the site and to adjacent parcels to allow for future redevelopment on the properties to the east and south of this parcel. The easements will be defined during the site plan process and recorded by the applicant upon approval by Frederick County. Prior to the occupancy of any structure on the site, the applicant will cause to construct drive aisles as necessary to provide access from any such structure to and from the traffic signal at the full commercial entrance on Senseny Road. 10.) Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road The applicant recognizes that the ultimate width o� with Greenwood Road will be approximately 100 fe side. The safe passage of pedestrians across desirable. The applicant agrees to install pedestrian and raised refuge islands as required to aid in the improvements will be installed prior to the issuance for any building on the site and only in accordance Virginia Department of Transportation. Senseny Road at the intersection �t from the south side to the north >enseny Road is necessary and usual signals and controls, striping, crossing of Senseny Road. These of the first certificate of occupancy with, and with the approval of, the 11.) Parcel Usage The applicant agrees to construct a pharmacy containing approximately 13,225 square feet and associated improvements on the southeast corner of the intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road as generally shown on the GDP. The applicant also agrees to prohibit the use of a Car Wash, SIC 7542, on the property. page 4 9 • PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 The conditions proffered above shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in the interest of the owner. In the even that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grant this rezoning and accepts these proffers, then these proffers shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to the other requirements of the Frederick County Code. Submitted By: 4t'&-a- c4lca�- Sandra Love, Power of Attorney City/Getwdy of \j , Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 200 Notard5ublic Notary Registration number: My commission expires: r page 5 day of JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires a 10 E PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL IUs: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Kenneth L. Mason City/Gemty of (�I4.c,i�eo t , Commonwealt�i Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �day of - 4u, , 200 n Notarwqublic Notary Registration number: My commission expires: 6 hirley B. Ma n 3o� JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires City/Ge-ti#q of � i o Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _`_0, -v - , 200 / Notarv/Vublic Notary Registration number: 26) 1 e2;� My commission expires: ! O 3I / o page 6 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires /� _3i /0 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Franklin B. Anderson City/Geumy of „v,,. � , Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this r� day of 200 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Nota Publlct/ Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 Notary Registration number: %6/6_3c)� My Commission Expires o 9 o My commission expires: !v 3/ / o page 7 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Donald E. Straus���� City/Geiin�y of �/�, ,,, „� Commonwealth � Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this � `ter day of 200 i J JEAN L. EBACK N otah Public Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Registration number: % C) Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires My commission expires: 10 s i I C' page 8 • 0 • E10-1 Lr rI-L-- I mvol-� —� F��+�-= tear F. L.•L . • • 1OPEDESTRIAN 5 EWALI 44 \\ O -__EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS \ IMPROVMENTS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS RIGHT -IN ONLY ACCESS ORRICK COMMONS Q a Q CC W (2e COMMERCIAL ENTRANCE O TRAFFIC SIGNAL ALTERATION >- z a 2a R-O-W DEDICATION W W >- 0 2 THRU/RIGHT TURN LAN RAISED MEDIAN Z W J Lu �� 00 > Y _j' W V N — — _-11' `N Z W Q 0 SIDEWALK I II I INTERPARCEL kCESS EASEMENT �I I I I 50' CAT. "B" BUFFER 25' INACTIVE BUFFER 25' ACTIVE BUFFER FULL SCREEN EXISTING RESIDENTIAL LOTS 60' 0' 60' W%me6� Scale 1' = 60 ft r CC W LLI M F- W Z LL W U w O Of ■ U J o N E I ♦ A (n ) N N Lo vi � ' N N 5 0 C + CU +c C O CD0 LU 0 JNf n L m °' E o LVo a) U -) U C C Z3: w 00 a C) (/') z J W Dw z zz ol Mau u w SURVEY: C.I.: N/A N/A DRAWN BY: JOB NO.: RED 0803015 SCALE: DATE: 1 "=60.0' 10/02/08 Drawing: GDP L� • 1932-1958 SenSeny Road Proffer Statement Rezoning #: Property: 3.93 acres PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Recorded Owner: Sandra Love, Power of Attorney, Kenneth L. & Shirley B. Mason, Franklin B. Anderson, Donald E. Strauss Applicant: Mr. David Ervin Ervin Development Corporation 1830 Plaza Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name: Ervin Development Corporation 1932-1958 Senseny Road Original Date of Proffers: July 2, 2008 Revision Date(s): October 2, 2008 Prepared by: PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel.: (540) 662-5792 email: office@painterlewis.com Job Number: 00803015 PROFFER STATEN RT • PARCEL Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 • Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, the undersigned applicant proffers that in the event that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County shall approve Rezoning Application # /3-0!W for the rezoning of parcels TM#'s 55-A-196, 65A-2-1,65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 from RP to B2, the use and development of the subject property shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions set forth in this proffer except to the extent that such conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such are approved by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the Code of Virginia and the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. These proffers shall be binding on the owner and their legal successors or assigns. 1.) Generalized Development Plan The applicant agrees to proffer the Generalized Development Plan (GDP) dated 10/02/08, identified as "1932-1958 Senseny Road" and which is attached to the proffer statement, for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of the proposed commercial development, the location and form of the site access, the location of the proposed pharmacy, the location of a monument to the Greenwood School, the approximate location of interparcel access easements, and construction improvements to Route 657 and Route 656. Please refer to the attached drawing named "GDP". • 2.) Improvements to Route 657 and Route 656 The applicant will make the necessary road frontage improvements, as required by the Virginia Department of Transportation, to Route 657 (Senseny Road) and Route 656 (Greenwood Road) in support of the proposed development. The improvements will be designed and submitted for approval to the Virginia Department of Transportation and Frederick County during the site plan review process. The improvements will include: a) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 657. The dedication will include approximately 7' parallel to the existing right of way along the full frontage of the site to provide a total right of way width of 80'; b) The design and construction of a right turn/ through lane eastbound on Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; c) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 656. The dedication will include approximately 3,300 square feet sufficient for the installation of additional lanes on Route 656 along the frontage of the site. d) The design and construction of a through lane and right turn lane northbound on Route 656 at its intersection with Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; e) The design and construction of a full access commercial entrance aligning with the existing entrance to Orrick Commons and the required alterations to the existing traffic signal as required by VDOT. f) The design and construction of a right-in/right-out commercial entrance on Greenwood Road. g) The design and construction of a right -in only commercial entrance on Senseny - Road. page 2 PROFFER STATEAT • PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 • 3.) Monetary Contribution to Frederick County Service Organizations The applicant will donate or will cause to be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County for the benefit of the Greenwood Community Fire and Rescue Company the sum of $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services. This sum will be paid upon the receipt of the first building permit issued for the site, subsequent to the approval of this rezoning. 4.) Maximum Floor Area The applicant agrees to limit the gross commercial floor area that will be built on the 3.93 acres to 30,000 square feet. The amount of commercial area to be built will be determined through the site plan review process. 5.) Design Features The applicant agrees to construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk running parallel with Route 657 and Route 656. The sidewalk will be maintained by the property owner(s). The sidewalk will be completed prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 6.) Monetary Contributions The applicant agrees to provide $25,000.00, for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 rights -of -way. This sum will be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 7.) Historical Monument The applicant agrees to construct a monument on the site commemorating the Greenwood School prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site. The monument will be constructed of materials from the original Greenwood School and generally conform to the sketch shown on the attached drawing titled "Greenwood School Monument" and dated April 13, 2007. The approximate location of the monument is shown on the Generalized Development Plan. The maintenance and upkeep of the monument will be the responsibility of the property owner. 8.) Building Design The proposed buildings shall be constructed using compatible architectural styles and materials. Design elements shall be compatible with Frederick County and will respect the continuity and character of the existing architectural fabric of the surrounding community. The principal facade in addition to any facade fronting Senseny Road and/or Greenwood Road shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco, or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. Metal panels shall be prohibited as a construction material for buildings. page 3 PROFFER STATEMPT PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 • 9.) Inter -parcel Circulation and Access The applicant agrees to provide access easements which will permit access through the site from all points of right of way access throughout the site and to adjacent parcels to allow for future redevelopment on the properties to the east and south of this parcel. The easements will be defined during the site plan process and recorded by the applicant upon approval by Frederick County. • 10.) Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road The applicant recognizes that the ultimate width of Senseny Road at the intersection with Greenwood Road will be approximately 100 feet from the south side to the north side. The safe passage of pedestrians across Senseny Road is necessary and desirable. The applicant agrees to install pedestrian visual signals and controls, striping, and raised refuge islands as required to aid in the crossing of Senseny Road. These improvements will be installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site and only in accordance with, and with the approval of, the Virginia Department of Transportation. 11.) Parcel Usage The applicant agrees to construct a pharmacy containing approximately 13,225 square feet and associated improvements on the southeast corner of the intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road as generally shown on the GDP. page 4 PROFFER STATEMEO 0 PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 • The conditions proffered above shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in the interest of the owner. In the even that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grant this rezoning and accepts these proffers, then these proffers shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to the other requirements of the Frederick County Code. Submitted By: Sandra Love, Power of Attorney City/County of FAI�_ , Commonwealth Of Virginia. instrument was acknowledged before me this �aK day of The foregoing 0CTD6 Z 200 Notary Public s0 • Si � �J �LO �+A • Z Notary Registration number: 40te = :FCOMMONWEAl1H OF VIRGINIA = COMMISSION My commission expires- �qi l /� � 3, a6d Ol k 353426 ti 0/qR i i P'' \G\\\\\\�. r: page 5 • PROFFER STATEME1 PARCEL IUs: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Kenneth L. Mason City/County of FA-(R AX Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o? a �d day of 6GTOBea 200 f� \\�� ASS I N E • , _�, ,, :'� COMMONWEALTH No ary Public = OFMRGINIA = = COMMISSION 353426 Notary Registration number: RIIIPI11e \\\\\\\\ My commission expires: �I�. 31 , aIi- OO \\G b Shirley; . Ma�on A. City/County of _ Fkt 9- fA Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this o? nod day of 11 � Notary Public�� n mISSIO •�s ''', 0.�oM tiFL•. O Notary Registration number:v? `��%�P - OMMONWEA`i" OF VIRGINIr\ COMMISSION _ # 353426 �^ My commission expires: . 3l, Q aj �% 0�'31:2009 ,•''111111111100 page 6 0 PROFFER STATEME- 0 PARCEL IUs: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Franklin B. Anderson ffr- City/County of rAtRFA'- Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this CZ?nd day of Cam"" - \\\11111111111; Notary Public ��`��MINE G'OM °ti 3S3q,,? F Notary Registration number: _ CO"^"1Q^^u�H _ _ of viacuiw COMMi551°N = k 353426 M commission expires, `%9�• 3�, aoo ��. Yp ', �'•. 31.2p0q ••'• • �� o"RIIIPU,6\,N page 7 PROFFER STATEME`!f' • PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 • cp"-5-- Donald E. Strauss City/County of IRFA�( _, Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this Zyld day of I� _7Z)L? 9 200 g Notary Public / �Q � '•p41S51 S' i �SJ � C�.��oM o`°F+' • Notary Registration number: ?/7�_ = COMMONWEALTH OF "PGiNW -_ COMMISSION My commission expires: mil. 31,a00 #353426 \ Oq/?I I �PU60\C������\\\ • 0 a 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK 041 i�Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: rwillia@co.frederick.va.us November 20, 2008 VIA FACSIMILE — (540) 662-5793 — AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. John C. Lewis, PE, CLA Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Application — 1932-1958 Senseny Road Draft Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2008 Dear John: I have reviewed the above -referenced draft Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2008. It is my opinion that the revised Proffer Statement dated October 14, 2008 would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following: 1. Proffer 1 (GDP) — This states that the applicant proffers the GDP for the purpose of identifying, among other things, "the location of the principal site access". As such, staff should be aware that Proffer 1 speaks only to the location of "principal" site access and does not actually limit additional access to the site nor, for that matter, does it limit the type of access (e.g., whether one or more entrances are to be right -in, right -out) at any location where access other than "principal' access might be included. 2. Proffer 4 (Maximum Floor Area) — Staff should be aware that the applicant only proffering a possible building square footage limitation and is not proffering to exclude any particular B2 uses of the site. Therefore, the rezoning, if approved, would allow the site to be used for any B2 use, with the only practical use limitation being what use(s) could be fit within the particular site, which is approximately 3.93 acres in size and fairly elongated in shape. Along related lines, I would note that the GDP, unlike some of the other items included as information in the draft rezoning package, does not actually identify the structure(s) to be built, or even building footprint(s)/location(s). Also, the provision concerning allowance of greater building square footage lacks specificity as to what if any further square footage limit would apply upon the requisite TIA finding. Staff should be aware as well that any such TIA would be conducted by a consultant of 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 a 0 Mr. John C. Lewis, PE, CLA November 20, 2008 Page 2 the applicant's choosing, with no apparent role for the County to address the results of the TIA. 3. Proffer 7 (Historical Monument) — The proffer does not state a deadline by which the applicant shall complete construction of the monument. 4. Proffer 10 (Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road) —The proffer does not state who will make the determination that the crossing is required, how the determination will be made, whether the determination must be made within a particular time frame, and the time frame within which the applicant must complete the improvement following a determination of its necessity. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific development, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. Sincerely yours, Roderick B. Williams County Attorney cc: Mr. Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Director, Frederick County Planning and Development 0 0 Mike Ruddy From: John Lewis oclewis@painterlewis.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:29 AM To: 'Smith, Matthew, P.E.'; 'John Bishop' Cc: 'Hoffman, Gregory'; 'Baluch, Stephen'; 'Greg Kerr'; cmohn@bowmanconsulting.com; plemieux@visuallink.com; 'iviike Ruddy'; 'Candice Perkins'; 'Eric Lawrence'; 'Funkhouser, Rhonda' Subject: RE: Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Property - VDOT Comments to TIA/ Rezoning John and Matt: Thanks for your responses. If I understand correctly, the comments are directed at insuring that this project construct a 4' median, an 11' left turn lane into Orrick, two-11' eastbound through lanes, and one-11' eastbound right turn lane into the Ervin site. Our application has committed to all of the foregoing except the eastbound right turn lane. To construct this turn lane will require the dedication of 19' to 20' of land along the frontage of the site and as you know, the existing lots are only about 200' in depth. The other confounding issue is the existing drainage condition in the right of way and I am hesitant to proffer an improvement that we can't actually construct. I think we may be able to do some "field designing" at a site meeting that may resolve my concerns. Can we meet October 13 at 11 AM or November 5 at 11 AM? Thanks John Lewis -----Original Message ----- From: Smith, Matthew, P.E. [mailto:Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 11:06 AM To: John Bishop; John Lewis Cc: Hoffman, Gregory; Baluch, Stephen; Greg Kerr; cmohn@bowmanconsulting.com; plemieux@visuallink.com; Mike Ruddy; Candice Perkins; Eric Lawrence; Funkhouser, Rhonda Subject: RE: Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Property - VDOT Comments to TIA/ Rezoning John Bishop is correct we did misread the Eastern Road Plan along Greenwood Road. As a result our comment about the additional right-of-way dedication along Greenwood can be deleted. I also agree with John Bishop that if you can adequately show that right turn lanes are not warranted, then the additional lane and right of way is not an issue along Senseny. However since the plan showed right turn lanes we assume they were required. Greg Hoffman and I can meet with you on site to discuss the issues. Greg is on Vacation until next Tuesday, so the meeting will need to be scheduled for after that. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Residency Staff Engineer VDOT - Edinburg Residency 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 Phone # (540) 984-5615 1 Fax # (540) 984-5607 0 From: John Bishop [mailto:7bishop@co.frederick.va.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2008 9:38 AM To: 'John Lewis' Cc: Hoffman, Gregory; Smith, Matthew, P.E.; Baluch, Stephen; 'Greg Kerr'; cmohn@bowmanconsulting.com; plemieux@visuallink.com; 'Mike Ruddy'; 'Candice Perkins'; 'Eric Lawrence' Subject: FW: Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Property - VDOT Comments to TIA/ Rezoning John -- First, I'm happy to meet on these and any issues as soon as everyone needed can be coordinated. That's no problem. There may be some confusion here on the extra lane you noted on Senseny, because I believe the only thing VDOT is asking for on Senseny Road that you have not already indicated a willingness to do is a right turn lane, which we have been asking for as well. I had conceded that perhaps a warrant analysis could be done that would prove that this wasn't needed, however what I received from your office has not convinced me that we should not plan for a right turn lane at the Orrick light. Why Orrick did not put in a right turn lane, as I understand it, had more to do with needed length not being available on property they controlled. We do expect to get right of way for that planned future need as the property in that area is site planned. As far as your development proffering more than Orrick, I don't see that as the overall case at all. Senseny is planned to be an urban section. That not being feasible has not come up before now. As I noted earlier, we are happy to discuss the issue, however I do not foresee staff backing off on this issue since Orrick has been following the urban standard on that side of the road. The issue of the extra lane on Greenwood is, I believe, due to a misinterpretation of the Frederick County Eastern Road plan, which I have attached. Greenwood Road is planned to be 2 lanes south of Senseny and 4 lanes north of Senseny. I hope this information is helpful, and I stand ready for a meeting. 2 0 • John A. Bishop, AICP Deputy Director - Transportation Frederick County Planning & Development 107 North Kent St, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 Ph: 540-665-5651 F: 540-665-6395 jbishop@co.frederick.va.us I have reviewed the comments from VDOT on the rezoning application. VODT is asking for an additional lane on Senseny and an additional lane on Greenwood. I want to avoid building another lane in Senseny. It would mean we would have to dedicate another 10 feet of ROW and it would reduce the amount of development area dramatically. As a consequence, our proposed development plan will not work on the site. We have completed a survey of the ROW and it is evident that Orrick Commons did not provide two through lanes and a right turn lane in Senseny Road. Why this rezoning app is being asked to provide more improvements than Orrick? In addition, I met with Public Works at the site last week to review some drainage issues. The existing culvert/ditch system is going to make the installation of an urban road section very difficult if not impossible. Can we please meet at the site? Thanks John John C. Lewis Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 3 0 Winchester, VA 22601 Off.: 540-662-5792 Fax.: 540-662-5793 Cel.: 540-323-5559 From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [mailto:Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] On Behalf Of Hoffman, Gregory Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:20 PM To: jclewis@painterlewis.com; jill@painterlewis.com; Michael.Glickman@phra.com Cc: Hoffman, Gregory; John Bishop; Smith, Matthew, P.E. Subject: Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Property - VDOT Comments to TIA/ Rezoning The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Routes 656 and 657. These route are the VDOT roadways which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is not satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2008 address transportation concerns associated with this request. We offer the following: * The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Senseny Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane. Development needs to provide an additional east bound thru lane with right turn lane as required by VDOT design standards. Additional right-of-way will be required at right turn lane(s). * Extend Senseny Road median to Orrick Commons intersection. * The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Greenwood Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane. Development needs to provide additional right-of-way dedication to accommodate future road section and right turn lane. * Sidewalk is shown off right-of-way and as such will not be maintained by VDOT. * Easements should be provided for inter -parcel connectivity to 4 adjoining parcels. • Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Gregory T. Hoffman, Supervisor Virginia Department of Transportation Edinburg Residency — Land Development 2275 Northwestern Pike Winchester, VA 22603 Phone #(540) 535-1824 Fax #(540) 535-1846 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1751 - Release Date: 10/27/2008 10:44 PM E • 0 • • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 August 13, 2008 Mr. John Lewis Painter — Lewis, P.L.C. 1817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: 1932 —1958 Senseny Road — Rezoning Comments Frederick County, Virginia Dear John: We have completed our review of the proposed rezoning and offer the following comments: 1. Refer to A. Site Suitability, page 1: We concur with your statement that the proposed sites are suited for rezoning to the Business General District. Based on the proposed development plan, we anticipate that all of the existing single family dwellings and associated accessory buildings will be demolished. A note should be added to the site plan to indicate that asbestos inspections and demolition permits will be required prior to demolishing these structures. 2. Refer to F. Drainage, page 5: Drainage will be a big concern for the proposed site development. Every effort should be made to divert drainage away from the residential dwellings located behind and to the south of the proposed development. It should be noted that the Department of Conservation and Recreation will require the implementation of best management practices (BMP) to manage storm runoff. The design of the stormwater management facilities should include an evaluation of an existing culvert which crosses under Senseny Road and connects to the stormwater system associated with the Orrick Commons 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 100 00 1932 —1958 Senseny Road Rezoning Comments Page 2 August 13, 2008 development. It appears that this culvert is located in front of parcel 65-A-214 and could possibly be used as a discharge point for a future BMP. I can be reached at 722-8214 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, Harvey E. tS rawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/r1s cc: Planning and Development +/ file T:\rsargent\Rhonda\TEMPCOMM) NTS\1932-1958SENSRNYRDREZCOM.doc • 0 0 0 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 TO: Jolui Lewis FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Director RE: Rezoning Notes — 1932-1958 Senseny Road, Ervin Development 2°d Effort DATE: September 4, 2008 The following additional points are offered regarding the 1932-1958 Senseny Road, Ervin Development Rezoning application. Please consider them as you continue your work preparing the application for submission to Frederick County. 1932-1958 Senseny Road, Ervin Development Rezoning — Additional Rezoning Notes. General. This property is located in a developing area that contains a number of established residential properties. Special consideration should be provided to ensure that the impacts to the adjacent residential properties are considered. Particular effort should be made to provide for enhanced design of the project to facilitate improved corridor appearance and the sensitive integration of the project into the surrounding community. Landscaping, lighting, and building layout and form should be carefully planned to ensure that this is achieved. Such design elements should seek to exceed those provided on other similar developments to ensure that this project fits in with the surroundings and context of this particular location. This could be done in context with the historical character of the property. Transportation. Proffer 2.b. addresses the design and construction of a right turn lane along the site's frontage to provide access to the site. This improvement should be considered the second lane improvement to Senseny Road that implements the ultimate U4D design section for 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • 1932-1958 Senseny Road, Ervin Development Rezoning — Preliminary Rezoning Comments September 4, 2008 Page 2 Senseny Road per the County's Eastern Road Plan. The design shown on the GDP provides for this. A right turn lane/taper should be evaluated at the sites main signalized entrance. The landscaped raised median shown in Senseny Road should be extended to the signalized intersection accessing the site and should provide for an appropriate length turn lane and pedestrian crossing accommodation. It is preferable that the GDP closely reflects what would be provided with the ultimate improvement of Senseny Road. This would also assist in limiting uncontrolled turning movements from the Senseny Road right In right out entrance. With regards to the design and construction of improvements to Greenwood Road, proffer 2.d. should provide for a more defined restriction on the turning and site access movements. Expanding the curb bump -outs and raised median, and raising the entrance splitter feature where striped on the GDP, would further define these movements. Proffer 2.e. addresses the construction of a full access commercial entrance aligning with • the existing Orrick Commons entrance. The GDP shows the entrance offset from Orrick. Please try and align the entrances on the GDP. The addition of a small median similar to that provided at Orrick alone may help achieve this aligrunent as would a slight adjustment to the west. Also, at this entrance the pedestrian accommodations should be extended to the eastern property line. Proffer 9. addresses inter parcel circulation and access. It is anticipated that redevelopment may occur on the property to the south of this parcel along Greenwood Road. Inter-uarcel circulation and access should be a greater consideration in this location. Proffer Statement. Proffer 4. Maximum Floor Area, is problematic in how it is written. 1 would suggest that you consider rewriting the proffer as follows: "The Applicant agrees to limit the gross commercial floor area that will be built on the 3.93 aces to 25, 000 square feet ". The additional language should be eliminated as it is tied to a future evaluation of the development's impact outside of a rezoning process. Alternately, base the current application and how the impacts will be addressed on the ultimate build out of the site. The previous request for the rezoning of this property provided for the potential relocation of the Greenwood Road commercial entrance to the south of its identified location in the fixture. This may warrant continued consideration to relieve the impacts along Greenwood Road. MTR/bad CVS Pharmacy - Route 657, Prede&�. County 0 Page I of I I Fries .. _ _.......... _.__.....____.. _.... _.... ............. . .. ...._......_..... .... _. From: John Lewis Uclewis@painterlewis.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 10:29 AM To: 'Jill Fries' Cc: david@ervindevelopment.com Subject: FW: CVS Pharmacy - Route 657, Frederick County . ..... ...... .. _... _ ..... ....... ... .......... ....... . . ..__._ .. _ . _...__ ....... .. __... From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [mailto:Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] On Behalf Of Smith, Matthew, P.E. Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 9:44 AM To: John Bishop Cc: Smith, Matthew, P.E.; Hoffman, Gregory; jclewis@painterlewis.com; Candice Perkins Subject: CVS Pharmacy - Route 657, Frederick County This email serves as a follow-up to our on site meeting on November 5, 2008 to discuss the right turn lane off Senseny Road into CVS. Based on this meeting, VDOT is in agreement that the outer lane of the urban four lane divided road section can be used as a shared thru and right turn lane for this development. This decision was made after discussions of modifying the western entrance on Senseny to a right in only and Bring the design so this movement is more channelized and unobstructed. Please note, this eliminates previous rezoning comment of requiring additional right-of-way for a dedicated right turn lane. Should you have any further questions, please contact me. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Residency Staff Enghieer VDOT - Edinburg Residency , UI) I Clu vanGyWfey rinu Edinburg, VA 22824 Phone # (540) 984-5615 Fax # (540) 984-5607 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.6/1797 - Release Date: 11/19/2008 8:58 AM No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.6/1797 - Release Date: 11 /19/2008 8:58 AM • 11 /24/2008 Er ,,hi 193-2-1958 Senseny Road PrOrty - VDOT Comments to TIA/ Rezoiia Page 1 of 2 �I Fries rrom: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Hoffman, Gregory [Gregory.Hoffman@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 3:20 PM To: jclewis@painterlewis.com; jill@painterlewis.com; Michael.Glickman@phra.com Cc: Hoffman, Gregory; John Bishop; Smith, Matthew, P.E. Subject: Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Property - VDOT Comments to TIN Rezoning The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Routes 656 and 657. These route are the VDOT roadways which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is not satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Ervin 1932-1958 Senseny Road Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2008 address transportation concerns associated with this request. We offer the following: . The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Senseny Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane. Development needs to provide an additional east bound thru lane with right turn lane as required by VDOT design standards. Additional right-of- way will be required at right turn lane(s). . Extend Senseny Road median to Orrick Commons intersection. . The County's Eastern Road Plan calls for Greenwood Road to be an urban four lane, divided road section (two thru lanes in each direction with median/center left turn lane). Development plan as shown only provides one thru, as the outer lane is a right turn lane. Development needs to provide additional right-of-way dedication to accommodate future road section and right turn lane. . Sidewalk is shown off right-of-way and as such will not be maintained by VDU T . . Easements should be provided for inter -parcel connectivity to adjoining parcels. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right- of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Vr ,ory T. Hoffman, Supervisor j. ginia Departnient of Transportation Edinburg Residency — Land Development 10/28/2008 I rN in 19 32-1958 Senseny Road Prwty - VDOT Comments to TIA/ Rezoif Page 2 of 2 2275 Northwestern Pike chester, VA 22603 to #(540) 535-1824 Fax #(540) 535-1846 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.4/1751 - Release Date: 10/27/2008 10:44 PM • 10/28/2008 John Lewis *From: Michael C. Glickman [Michael.Glickman@phra.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:15 AM To: John Lewis Subject: FW: Ervin-Senseny Road Property TIA - VDOT Review Comments to 08/26/08 Submittal Just received these. Michael C. Glickman, PE Director of Transportation Planning Patton Harris Rust & Associates P 888.616.8286 C 540.421.5685 E Michael.Glickman@phra.com -----Original Message ----- From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [mailto:Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Matthew, P.E. Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 9:16 AM To: Michael C. Glickman Cc: Smith, Matthew, P.E.; Short, Terry; John Bishop Subject: Ervin-Senseny Road Property TIA - VDOT Review Comments to 08/26/08 Submittal VDOT has the following comments regarding the subject TIA: On Behalf Of Smith, * For 2010 Background Scenario, AM Synchro file used pm+pt Ophase for SBL, while PM and Sat Synchro files used pm phase. Also, AM and Sat Synchro files didn't use overlap phase for NBR, but PM file used overlap phase. * Pass -by trips were assigned to Site Dr. #2 and #3, but not for Site Dr. 41, please explain. * Pass -by trips should be removed as they pass a site entrance, not at up/downstream intersections leading to the proposed development. Please revise. * Referencing Figure 6 on Page 12, 30% of the site generated trips are from the east, west, and nurLh; and 10% trips are from the south. However, the trip distribution volumes illustrated on Figure 7 are different than these percentages. For example, volumes at Site Dr. 41 should be 17(36)[32], trips at Site Dr. #3 should be 50(108)[95], and trips from the north and west at Rte. 656/Rte. 657 should be 50(108)[95]. Please revise. * For the 2010 Build -Out scenario, many through movement queues are longer than the left -turn and/or right -turn pocket lane lengths, which means that the 95th percentile back of queue of the through movement may be longer than the turn lanes provided/proposed. For example, the EBT movement at Rte. 656/Rte. 657 PM has a queue of 657 ft, and the distance between Rte. 656/Rte. 657 and the upstream intersection is 670 ft. With the short left -turn and right -turn pocket lane lengths the through movement queue may be longer than 654 ft, as a result the queue may spill back to the upstream intersection. Should you have any comments, do not hesitate to call. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Residency Staff Engineer VDOT - Edinburg Residency 14031 Old Valley Pike 1 9 Edinburg, VA 22824 Phone Jk (540) 984-5615 Fax Jk (540) 984-5607 • No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1685 - Release Date: 9/22/2008 4:08 PM 0, • From:LIFESAFE 01/2008 16:34 #217 P.001/001 6, a !. CMS it it }� UxRGINIA,,6 Control number Date received I. ate a;viewed Date Revis: 0 RZ08-o008 7/8/2008 7. V /2008 Project Name Applicant 1932-1958 Senseny Road Ervin DF-✓elopment/Painter-Lewis, PLC Address City state Zip Applicart Phone 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester iA 226i:1 540-662 "792 Type Application Tax ID Number Fire Distric I Rescue District Rezoning 55-A-196 18 18 Current Zoning Election Distric RP Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Recommendation,; Automatic Fire Alarm System No Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway/Aisleway Width Not Identified Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Yes J. Neal Red Bud Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required No Sp,.-ci-:I Hazards No Sig�rature t .j Title E • .11 I August 13, 2008 Mr. John Lewis Painter — Lewis, P.L.C. 1817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: 1932 — 1958 Senseny Road — Rezoning Comments Frederick County, Virginia Dear John: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 We have completed our review of the proposed rezoning and offer the following comments: 1. Refer to A. Site Suitability, page 1: We concur with your statement that the proposed sites are suited for rezoning to the D ( 1 Tl' + + Reno nn +l�c> r^ osed develorr::ent 1 n ::�P an}rrinate that L LrJlrless Verler al LrJ LrrV L. LUJVd Vll L11V p vp i p as , ant.;--;.,---,- -- all of the existing single family dwellings and associated accessory buildings will be demolished. A note should be added to the site plan to indicate that asbestos inspections and demolition permits will be required prior to demolishing these structures. 2. Refer to F. Drainage, page 5: Drainage will be a big concern for the proposed site development. Every effort should be made to divert drainage away from the residential dwellings located behind and to the south of the proposed development. It should be noted that the Department of Conservation and Recreation will require the implementation of best management practices (BMP) to manage storm runoff. The design of the stormwater management facilities should include an evaluation of an existing culvert which crosses under Senseny Road and connects to the stormwater system associated with the Orrick Commons 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 9 • 1932 —1958 Senseny Road Rezoning Comments Page 2 August 13, 2008 • development. It appears that this culvert is located in front of parcel 65-A-214 and could p pp possibly be used as a discharge point for a future BMP. r� U I can be reached at 722-8214 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, r �l U Harvey E. rawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: Planning and Development file T:\rsargent\Rlionda\TEMPCOMivIENTS\1932-1958SENSENYRDREZCOM.doe 0 • Rezonina Comments Ir re(leriek County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authol•Ity Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 \\/inchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 868-1061 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Aun: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia Applicant: P1Case till out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Sanitation Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: eyyI/) 'telephone: /lailina Address: Flo Old o &2 i lI a/ Location of property: Yjv#2, 60-4 //L C (7 LI)'I•CIIt Zoning: /M Zoning requested: �- Acreme: 1`7 Sanitation Authority Comments: Sanitation Authority S1t rn`atLlre Date: & Notice to Sanitation Ek-dhority - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 23 • 0 • Rezoning Comments Frederick-Wlnebester Service Authority Mail to: Fred-Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse �V. Moffett, Executive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 722-3579 Hand deliver to: Fred -'Wine Service ALIthority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 107 North Kent Slrect '\Vinchester, Virginia Applicant: PICaSC till ollt the 111f0rmation as aCCUrately as possible in orde1'to assist the Fred-�!�inc Service Arithoritywithiheirrevie��-. Attac}1 a copy ofyoul-applicatioli form, Iocatioi map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Na1ne; ��U' ll� �Cv �.�vp�Ynt Telephone: JYO iNlailing Address: C�lt �Q�f'?�%//' avI(-S PLL — %�/: :% i7 �JjS -?(7 Location of property: Cl l' E7l/eel� / 11 �t%N ,12' b5 ,) SoC1 2�cfi Current Zoning: f-I Zoning requested: WA acreage: 3- �3 F i'ed- 4VInC Servicev1111i1e1It9: �1Q come Fred -Wine Service ALIth ritb-'S Sitl�rlature Date: Lk.,/ vt/ � Notice to ;;{red -Wine Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant 31 • • • w1�'t'eC�`eP'1e�{--WII14;�1e5teY' HealthDepartment IN'l.ail to: Frederick-Wincliester health Department Attu: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Strect Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722-3480 Hand deliver to: Frederick-`Vinchester Health Deparmi n<l Attll: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia Applicant; Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick-`Villchester Health Department. with their rcvi v. Attach a copy of your application forill, location I11,11), proffer stateIIlent, impact analysis, and ally other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: C(-Vm Telephone: S -70,'2 - 97 � Nlailing Address: C16' Patfi nv-wail— ALL f: h �Lfts �t �, VA 2 1;(�,1(-)/ Location of property: or,-( &C c/ CV ��SG�� SOC��%?�?Cr�i� �/C/GC Current zoning: Zoning requested: Acreno e: 1n((T? K,\j P" I'I'C(lel IC1�-�V'ItlChetil'Cr Fleaidl DepartI17ent's C"Oniments: h W (X� 'I-)LlIII 5 for t1}4111- v+i'J p cola( ,IMP J i SI S•.���s a 1 i t( Health Dept. Signature & Date: �' z'r-� 7/1 M ,5 Notice to Health Department - Please I. Ltli1'n This Form to the Applicant �7be! iC�p;`r/L'tr�tlo 24 Rezoning Comments Mail to: Vdinchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (540) 662-2422 Winchester Region al Airport Tl an d deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport A[ to : Executi ire Director 41)1 Airporl Road (I:t. 45, off of Rt. 522 South) vViuehester, Virmilla Applicant: Please fill out the information as accuratel ), as possi')l(.- in order to assist + ,e )AIinchester Regional Airport with thee- review. Attach a copy of your application 11r1171, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and imy oflie.r pertinent lnfoN-n: anon. Applicant's \Name: eyuln PKU4�1✓�M e11t Telephone: WD' 72I;) 5`7:22 il1lailing Address: %Pain l.,ocation of property: /�'z�i'�GG%7��I Current zoning:i� Zoning requester. ; Acreage,: _ J Winchester Regional Airport's q Signature & Date: (n�---- I ��IL- �� Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - Please. Reti,rr, Form to Applic'� ,t 07-25-08;09:11AM; Pa n13r i 5406622_i: # 2/ 2 V. REGION ql WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT SERVING 1HE 491 AIRPORT ROAD TOP OF VIRGINIA WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 - ql,,, (540) 662-2422 July 25, 2008 Jill Fries Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 116 South Stewart Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Comments 1932 --1958 Senseny Road Redbud Magisterial District Dear Ms. Fries: The above referenced proposal was reviewed. While the proposed devi: lopment lies within the airport's Part 77 surfaces and Airspace, it appears that the • proposed site plan should not impact operations at the Winchester Regi,:,nal Airport. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Is P_�_YNR N\-k- k_t Serena R. Manuel Executive Director Li 2008-Jul-31 09:07 AVrederick County Public Sc.hoai 5406624237 3/3 • ���4 ' COS Reronili Conaxx�cnts _._ 4 .. � �"� Superintendent of Frederick. County. POlac Schools To *1 Mail to; Fedexicic County Public S6110015 Atta: Supelantendam P.O. •Box 3508 Win nester, Virginia 22604• (540) G62•-3888 Himd dtliyor to; T'rederick Comity Public Schools ,A•ttn; Superinte-adont School Administration Building 1.415' A mherst S'trt'_et Windies(er, Viirghlia. Applicanti P101se fill out.the ii]foilijltion as accifra`tely as possible -in order to assist the SuperintcndentofPul�lic Sclrools.ti��ith liis tevle�n�. Attach a copy Of You" appl Ution fQt tit, location snap, proffe'l- anfement•, iiupaet analysts, and any other pel°tbierif informatiolt. ApplicapesName: Gi' Vln �Gl LO M6 Telephone: l `? -' --------------- Mailh Address: qU pam -Wry ��— 190 Vocation of propeay: d4 currem zoni'l1g: 1' _ Zoning £equested: cSApCi'zz1LC�1dC1It Q:i .i'illJxiC �i;i7Ui3RS i.UAiSA�;hits. Superintendent's SignMwO & Date: Notice to Sellool ,Superintend.eut - 'lease Return Tliis, Form to the A.pphcant•, 2'2 11/20/2008 13:09 5070370 FREDERICK 0NTY GOV PAGE 02/03 • 0, November 20, 2008 VIA FACSINULE — (540) 662-5793 -- AND REGULAR MAIL Mr. John C. Lewis, PE, CLA Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade,. Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Application — 1932-1958 Senseny Road .Draft Proffer Statement dated. July 2, 2008 Dear John, COUNTY of FREDERICK Roderick B. Williams County Attorney 540/722-8383 Fax 540/667-0370 $-mail: rwillia@coftederick.va.us I have reviewed the above -referenced draft Proffer Statement dated July 2, 2(108. It is my opinion that the revised Proffer Statement dated October 14, 2008 would be in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and the Code of Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following: 1. Proffer l (GDP) —This states that the applicant proffers the GDP for �,Ie purpose of identifying, among other things, "the location of the principal site access". As such, staff should be aware that Proffer 1 sDeaks, onN to the location of "nrincinal" sii-e acep5:c and does not actually limit additional access to the site roar. for that matter, does it limit the type of access (e.g., whether one or more entrances are to be right -in, .rief: out) at any location where access other than. "principal" access might be included. 2. Proffer 4 (Maximum Floor Area) —Staff should b,� aware that the applicant only proffering a possible building square footage limitation and is not proffering %) exclude any particular B2 uses of the site. Therefore, the rezoning, if approved, woul:: allow the site to be used for any B2 use, with the only practic:d use limitation being whet use(s) could be fit within the particular site, which is approximately 3.93 acres in sip,-, and fairly elongated in shape. Along related lines, I would note that the GDP, unlike some of the other items included as information in the draft rezoning package, does not ac: ually identify the structures) to be built, or even, building footprint(s)/location(s). ,also, the Provision concerning allowance of greater building square: footage lacks spec -deity as to what if any further square footage limit would apply upon the requisite TIA finding. Staff should be aware as well that any such TIA. would be conducted by a comultant of 107 North Kent Street 9 Winchester. Virginia 22601 11/20/2008 13:09 5#70370 FREDERICKWNTY GOV PAGE 03/03 • • Mr. John C. Lewis, PE, CLA November 20, 2008 Page 2 the applicant's choosing, with no apparent role for the County to address the results of the TI . . Proffer 7 (Historical Monument) —The proffer dues not stage a deadline by which the applicant shall complete construction of the monument. 4. Proffer 10 (Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road;) —The proffer does not state who will make the determination that the crossing is required, how the detenninati.on will be made, whether the determination must be made within a particular time f ,,mc, and the time frame within which the applicant must complete the improvement following a determination of its necessity. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific development, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by staff and the Planning Commission. Sincerely yours, Roderick B, Williams County Attorney cc: Mr. Michael T. Ruddy, ,AICP, Deputy Director, Frederick: County Planning ar,d Development 0 4k • IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT for Ervin Development Corporation 1932 -1958 Senseny Road Redbud Magisterial District Frederick County, Virginia July 3, 2008 Prepared for: Mr. David Ervin Ervin Development Corporation 1830 Plaza Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Prepared by: PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 is email: (540)662-5792 email: office@painterlewis.com Job Number: 0803015 IMP ACT ANALYSISOATEMENT 1932 -1958 Senseny Road • IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS section paqe i. INTRODUCTION 2 A. SITE SUITABILITY 2 B. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES 3 C. TRAFFIC 4 D. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT 5 E. WATER SUPPLY 5 F. DRAINAGE 5 G. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES 5 H. HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES 5 I. COMMUNITY FACILITIES 6 J. LOT CONSOLIDATION 6 6, • IMPACT ANALYSISTATEMENT 1932 -1958 Senseny Road • i.INTRODUCTION Ervin Development Corporation (the applicant) proposes to rezone six parcels of land located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Senseny Road, VA Route 657, and Greenwood Road, VA Route 656, in Frederick County, VA. The parcels (the site) are currently zoned RP (Residential Performance District) and are identified by the following Tax Identification Numbers: Tax Map No. Area (acres) Ex. Zoning Pr. Area Pr. Zoning 55-A-196 1.62 RP 1.61 B2 65-A-2-1 0.47 RP 0.45 B2 65-A-2-1-2 0.45 RP 0.39 B2 65-A-2-1-3 0.46 RP 0.47 B2 65-A-2-1-4 0.46 RP 0.39 B2 65-A-2-1-5 0.47 RP 0.42 B2 Total 3.93 3.72+/- The applicant is requesting to rezone the properties from RP, Residential Performance District to B2, Business General District. The total area of the request is approximately 3.93 acres. Please refer to Exhibit 1 on the following page. The • intended purpose of the rezoning is to enable the applicant to develop the site for commercial purposes. A. SITE SUITABILITY The subject parcels are located at the corner of a major intersection within the Urban Development Area established by Frederick County as shown on the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan contained in the current Comprehensive Plan. The ric�crrinfinn of _R7 Inning in the FrarlPrirk (ni inh/ 7nninn nrrfinancP states that general business areas are located at major intersections, involve frequent and direct access by the general public, and should have direct access to major thoroughfares. Considering this and the fact that all the other parcels at this intersection are currently zoned B2 or contain commercial uses, this site appears suited for rezoning to the Business General District. Although the subject site lies within an area designated as residential on the Comprehensive Plan, it is also located at a high traffic intersection where B2 uses would be beneficial and convenient for neighboring residents to meet their daily needs. The properties in the northwest and southwest quadrants of this intersection are currently zoned B2. The property in the northeast quadrant contains a convenience store and gas station. Adjacent to that property is the "Orrick Commons" shopping center. On the subject parcels, in the southeast quadrant, the applicant's conceptual plans are to construct a pharmacy with a drive through window, along with a bank with drive through windows, and a one story retail space as shown on the adjacent page listed as Exhibit 2. The location, zoning, uses, and owners of the adjacent parcels can be seen in _. Exhibit 1. There are existing covenants for the subject parcels identified as TM#'s 65A- 2 IMPACT ANALYSISITATEMENT • 1932 -1958 Senseny Road • 2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-2-3, 65A-2-1-4, and 65A-2-1-5 located in the Greenwood Heights subdivision. When the consolidation of the subject parcels occurs these covenants will be eliminated. 100 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN FIRM Community Panel Number 510063 0115 B shows the subject area to be outside of any flood hazard zone. WETLANDS No wetlands have been identified on this site. STEEP SLOPES According to the soil survey information there are no steep slopes located on this site. MATURE WOODLANDS There are no mature woodlands located on this site. SOILS According to the Soil Survey of Frederick County, the site contains the following soil type only: • Clearbrook channery silt loam: 9B (2-7%) This soil is moderately deep, gently sloping, and somewhat poorly drained. It is mostly found along heads of drainage ways • and in broad upland depressions. B. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES • The parcels to be rezoned are bordered to the east and south by parcels which are all zoned RP. Across Greenwood Road, to the west are two parcels, one which is zoned RP and to the north of that parcel, one which is zoned B2. Diagonally across the intersection is a parcel which is zoned B2. Across Senseny Road, to the north, are two parcels which are zoned RA. Adjacent to these parcels are two parcels, which are the "Orrick Commons" shopping center and are zoned B2. The following table lists all adjacent owners and parcel numbers. Tax Map No. Owner Ex. Zoning Ex. Use 65A-2-1-6 Dorgan, Michael C. RP Residential 65A-3-39 Shields, Robert J. & Carolyn L. RP Residential 65A-3-44 Gum, David C., Jr. & Paige E. RP Residential 65A-3-46 Casey, Charles H. RP Residential 65A-3-48 Russell, Robert W. & Kristina S. RP Residential 65A-3-50 Whetzel, William A., Sr. & Angela L. RP Residential 65A-3-52 Gochenour, Jeffrey R. RP Residential 65A-7-7 Kerns, KathyS. RP Residential 65A-7-8 Stafford, Timothy BS Residential 55-A-197 TGC Management, LLC B2 Commercial 55-A-198 Greenwood Sen, LLC B2 Commercial 3 9 0 IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT 1932 -1958 Senseny Road 55-A-197 Stafford, Timothy RA Residential 55-A-201A Orrick Cemetery Company B2 Commercial 55-A-201 B Orrick Cemetery Company B2 Commercial C. TRAFFIC The property is located at the signalized intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road. According to the Frederick County Eastern Road Plan, Senseny Road and Greenwood Road, from Senseny Road to the north, are ultimately planned as 4 lane major collectors. Greenwood Road, from Senseny Road to the south, is ultimately planned as a 2 lane minor collector. A Traffic Impact Analysis is contained in Section 7. The analysis was performed by Patton Harris Rust & Associates. The TIA as presented is based on a total build -out of the site of approximately 24,000 square feet of commercial space which could include a pharmacy, a bank, and a convenience store with gas dispensers. These particular uses were proposed to achieve a high level of trips generated by the proposed site. According to figures from the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Average Annual Daily Traffic on Route 656, Greenwood Road, in 2005 from the north to this intersection was 9,500 vehicles/day and from the south to this intersection was 4,400 vehicles/day. The Average Annual Daily Traffic on Route 657, Senseny Road, from the west to the Route 657, Greenwood Road, intersection in 2005 was 12,000 vehicles/day • and from the east was 4,500 vehicles/day. These figures are factored to account for all motorized vehicles. The TIA shows that projected background traffic generated by nearby planned projects significantly impacted the functionality of the Greenwood Road and Senseny Road intersection. The addition of traffic which would be generated as a result of the proposed rezoning will contribute to the degradation of the intersection by the addition of turning movements into and out from the site. The applicant can mitigate traffic impacts only to the extent that ownership of the right-of-way allows. In this case, the southern right-of-way line along the parcel adjacent to Senseny Road and the eastern right-of-way along the parcel adjacent to Greenwood Road can be expanded through fee simple dedication. Within this dedication area, turn lanes can be constructed to facilitate traffic movements not only associated with the site, but also general traffic movements through the intersection. As shown on the Generalized Development Plan, the applicant will construct a right turn lane within a right-of-way dedication along Senseny Road. Any access to the site along Senseny Road will be restricted to "right in, and perhaps, right out" only. In order to ensure this type of restricted entrance, a raised median will be constructed in Senseny Road. The applicant will construct a through lane and a right turn lane within a right-of- way dedication along Greenwood Road. The existing through lane in Greenwood Road will be converted to a left turn lane. Access to the site from Greenwood Road will be 0 restricted to "right in, right out" only. Please refer to the attached Proffer Statement. 4 01 IMPACT ANALYSIS�ATEMENT 1932 -1958 Senseny Road • D. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND TREATMENT The site is inside the limits of the Frederick County Sewer and Water Service Area. The development would be serviced by the county sewer system. The location of the existing 8" sewer line is shown on the Water and Sewer Facilities Maps 55-7 and 65-1, on the following pages. E. WATER SUPPLY The site is inside the limits of the Frederick County Sewer and Water Service Area. The development would be serviced by the county water system. The location of the existing 8" water line is shown on the Water and Sewer Facilities Maps 55-7 and 65-1. F. DRAINAGE According to the USGS topographic map and the Frederick County Soil Survey it appears that this site has gentle slopes ranging from 2 percent to 7 percent. It appears that the water sheet flows across the site from west to east and then down Senseny Road. With the development of this site a storm water management system would be implemented to control any added flow created by the increased impervious areas. • G. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES The nearest citizens' trash facility is located less than one mile north of the site on Greenwood Road. In general, the collection of solid waste from the proposed commercial development will be accomplished by a private hauler. It is estimated that the development will generate approximately 100 pounds of solid waste per acre per day that will be transported to the landfill. Tipping fees are currently $45 per ton for commercial haulers. No additional solid waste disposal facilities will be required for the proposed development. It is estimated that $3,240 in tipping fees will be paid to dispose of 72 tons of solid waste. H. HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES This site does contain one known "potentially significant" historic structure as listed in The Rural Landmarks Survey Report of Frederick County. This structure is listed as 421-Greenwood School on Exhibit 3. During the Civil War many schools in the area closed because most of the male students went to war and a lot of the schoolhouses were destroyed. Following the Civil War many new schools were established. This period marked the beginning of public education in Frederick County. The majority of the schoolhouses built during this period were one -room buildings constructed of brick, and later rusticated concrete block. Thirty schools from this time period were surveyed, including the Greenwood School. Most of these structures are now abandoned or have been converted to residences, 5 0 55-7 CRAPIK FC IE 6_ WATER AND SEWE FACILITIES MAF 0 9 -------- -- T. 65-1 WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES MAP Adlk • 1I CIVIL WAR SITES w • IMPACT ANALYSIS PATEMENT • 1932 -1958 Senseny Road • residence. It is the applicant's intent that materials from the school building will be used to construct a monument on site commemorating the historical building with a plaque describing the history of the structure. The monument will generally conform to the sketch shown in Section 8. Please see the Generalized Development Plan (contained within the Proffer Statement in Section 8) for the monument location. There are several other "potentially significant sites" that lie within a mile of the site. These include 417-Carper House, 420-Carmen House, 1136-Keyser-Edmonson House, 1148-Brookland, and 1151-Ford-Braithwaite. The Rural Landmarks Survey Report lists several other structures within approximately one mile of the site as shown on Exhibit 3. A copy of the Civil War Battlefields and Sites map has been included on the following pages. The subject parcels do not lie on any Civil War Battlefield sites. 1. COMMUNITY FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT MODEL The new Development Impact Model (D.I.M.) is utilized primarily for residential rezoning requests. It is anticipated that the capital facilities impacts of commercial and industrial rezoning requests are ultimately fiscally positive to the County by policy. Accordingly, the D.I.M. does not apply a fiscal impact to commercial rezoning. EMERGENCY SERVICES Police protection is provided by the Frederick County Sheriff's Department. The nearest fire and rescue facility is the Greenwood Volunteer Fire Company located on Greenwood Road. No additional fire and rescue facilities will be required for the area proposed to be rezoned. The Frederick County Capital Facilities Impact Model calculates that there will not be any projected capital cost for emergency service facilities attributable to this development. The owner recognizes the importance of emergency services, and proposes to proffer a monetary contribution to the local emergency responder. See the attached Proffer Statement. PARKS AND RECREATION There are typically no impacts on Parks and Recreation facilities associated with rezoning to a commercial use. J. LOT CONSOLIDATION Exhibit 5 on the following page shows the total site proposed for rezoning in a consolidated form. Consolidation will eliminate interior lot lines. The access easement will be extended to Route 50 generally as shown on the exhibit to preserve access to the adjacent parcels. no I I I I w O X O O z 0 PAINTER-LEWISP.L.C.PROJECT: PURVEY: cNA � 1932-1958 SENSENY ROAD st 7 Ceder Creek Grade, site 120 DRAWN BY: JOB NO.: ERVIN DEVELOPMENT GROUP JCL 0803015 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Telephone (540)662-5792 FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA SCALE: DATE: CONSULTING Facsimile (540)662-5793 CONSOLIDATION OF LOTS SHEET: ENGINEERS Email office@painterlewis.com EXHIBIT 5 w • w A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. • 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. LandsccpeArchitects. Williamsport, Maryland 21795 p ][- 10212 Governor Lane Blvd, Suite 1007 T 301.223.4010 H_,+ F 301.223.6831 August 26, 2008 Revised October 8, 2008 • 0 • • OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Ervin - Senseny Road Property development to be located along the east side of Route 656 (Greenwood Road), south of Route 657 (Senseny Road) in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed development is to include 12,900 square feet of pharmacy, 4,000 square feet of Convenience Mart with pumps and an 8,000 square foot bank. Access will provided via a right in/right out only site -driveway to be located along east side of Greenwood Road as well as via two (2) site - driveways to be located along the south side of Senseny Road: a full access driveway and a right in/right out only driveway. The proposed development will be built -out over a single transportation phase by the year 2010. Analyses are provided for existing, 2010 background and 2010 build -out year as well as 2016 "design year" traffic conditions. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed Ervin - Senseny Road Property development with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Ervin - Senseny Road Property development were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the area of impact, • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Ervin - Senseny Road Property development, • Distribution and assignment of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property development - generated trips onto the completed roadway network, • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of Synchro 7 for existing and future conditions. PHIS A Revised Trafc Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Rona Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October- 8, 2008 Page I 0 • • 1 No Scalc m F Q zi a Green P� Dr Senseny R Senseny Rd G� R ArokeGr SITE sensE ' J kC' c J a 70 7 � U uGre"WOOO A ve V 11 o �r,, 1, .... 410'*c P1 ATR+/ Figure 1 Vicinity Map: Ervin - Senseny Road Property, in Frederick County, VA P r;AA Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 H October 8, 2008 Page 2 0 • • • EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR+A conducted weekday AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersection of Greenwood Road/Senseny Road. In order to determine the ADT (Average Daily Trips) along the study area roadway links, "k" factors (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 10% and 11% were utilized for Greenwood Road and Senseny Road, respectively, based upon the published Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) 2006 traffic count data. Figure 2 shows the existing weekday and Saturday ADT as well as weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes at key locations within the study area. Figure 3 shows the existing lane geometry and weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour levels of service. PHR+A has provided Table 1 to show the existing weekday AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour levels of service and 95`h percentile back of queue for each lane group. All traffic count data and Synchro level of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of the report. A Revised Tra f c Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 3 • r 1 U No Scale 656 N w 0 8330 Wry A � g r� 7700 16(13)(1))19SI [2151(279)166 .,,I I11197))2G� Senses [3 [33](RO 50 Y Road v n r Q7 0 Q 657 / t�tic 4 � a'I Cj I A 1 Q0 47Q0 3 SITE' 3620 Site Dr St r2O 1 Saturda ADT PT TR+n AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions PH �� A Revised Trnfic /mpnct Annlvsis of the Ervin - Sertsenv Rond PropertZ Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 e4 Page 4 0 • • 1� u No Scale 656 Signalized n Intersection LOS = B(Q[B] n 1ARAM � se" v � " JY Road � C �I / of / of o Q~i / 657 O SITE; -Site Dr#1 P7 T11+/ \ AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PH �� A Revised Traffic Impnct Annl sis of the Ervin - Sensetty Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 e5 Page 5 • • Table 1 Levels of Service and Back of Queue (95%) Results Existinu Conditions Intersection Traffic Control Lure Group/ Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Quene Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Greenwood Road (Rt 656) Signalized EB/L A 54.0 B 144.0 A 101.0 EB/TR A 46.0 A 129.0 A 78.0 EB LOS A A A WB/L B 25.0 B 27.0 B 25.0 WB/T B 99.0 B 156.0 B 151.0 WB/R A 25.0 A 27.0 A 28.0 WB LOS A B B NB/LT D 108.0 D 206.0 D 132.0 NB/R B 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 NB LOS D D C SB/LT D 154.0 E 198.0 D 186.0 SB/R A 62.0 A 61.0 A 54.0 SB LOS C C C Overall LOS B C B PHPU� * Assumed 25 feet Vehicle Length Minimum queue length assumed to be 25 feel EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Left, T:Thru, R: Right A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 6 9 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS In order to determine the 2010 background traffic conditions, PHR+A grew the existing traffic volumes (shown in Figure 2) using a rate of 1 % per year through Year 2010. Additionally, all trips relating to specific future "other developments" located within the vicinity of the site were incorporated. Using the 7111 Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Table 2 to summarize the 2010 "other developments" trip generation. Table 2 2010 "Other Developments" Trip Generation Sun inary Code Land Use Amount In ADI Peak flour Out Total In I'M Peak flour Out Total ADT In SAT Peak (lour Out 'Total ADT Fieldstone 210 Single -Family Detached 63 units 13 40 54 45 25 71 630 36 31 67 682 230 Townhouse 207 units 24 81 105 86 49 135 1,352 63 56 121 1,369 Total 37 121 159 131 74 206 1 982 99 87 188 2 051 Orrick Property 251 Elderly l lousing - Detach 75 units 8 14 22 24 16 40 424 10 11 20 208 252 Elderly Housing - Attach 100 units 4 4 8 7 4 11 3,18 15 15 30 251 565 Day Care 6,000 SF 41 36 77 32 36 68 476 6 4 10 37 710 Office 25,000 SF 54 7 62 18 89 107 459 6 6 12 72 820 Retail 80,200 SF 84 53 137 260 281 541 5,884 390 360 750 8,041 881 Pharmacy w/ DT 15,000 SF 23 17 40 63 66 129 1,322 59 59 118 1,322 912 Drive-in Bank 6,000 SF 41 33 74 137 137 274 1,351 113 109 222 456 932 11-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 76 44 120 950 932 11-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 76 44 120 950 'total 327 231 558 622 680 1,302 11,789 751 651 1,403 12,288 • Figure 4 shows the 2010 background weekday and Saturday ADT as well as weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2010 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour levels of service. Table 3 is provided to show the 951h percentile back of queue and levels of service for each lane group during 2010 background conditions. Synchro levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of this report. • PHR1\ A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Elvin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 7 0 0 • • • No Scale 656 w� 8869 W�� NWT N W a 1 9p(63 / 8 �60(3 2�� "0616�[22�71(294)174 �%t (IS4)[14p, I ti v63g0 [3501( 1(8))16� [34 82 52 t Scttsett d y Roy q v 4 § Q 71 ■ �p ti M 10 33(61 G G q,l [280](362j207� M ^ 123(.323)(3 p iI 8 I q� 6363 SITE i Site Dr #1 v 0 0 0 0 0 a 6363 8 u 1 Saturday ADT A A -,.-][:Z+/ AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Figure 4 2010 Background Traffic Conditions PH J� A Revised Trnff'ic lmpnct Analvsis of the Ervin - Senseny Roncl PropertJ Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 8 Page 8 • • • No Scale 656 Signalized n Intersection r' n LOS = B(C)[B1 ACIt)lB/ [B7(C)B se"') Signalized � v A3 �r7 Q' Intersection LOS = A(A)[Al n V 1 tiU q�, 3 SITE .6, w Site Dr # i t , � �R. � � "New Intersection" A -I"- AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)[Saturday Peak Hour] Figure 5 2010 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service p ][- A Reviser! Tra is lmpnct Anal sy is of the Ervin - Sensenv Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 H_�A October 8, 2008 Page 9 0 E Table 3 Levels of Service and Back of Queue (95%) Results 2010 Background Conditions Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Greenwood Road (Rt 656) Signalized EB/L A 70.0 B 147.0 B 99.0 EB/TR B 149.0 C 317.0 B 243.0 EB LOS A C B WB/L A 25.0 B 45.0 A 46.0 WB/T B 98.0 B 181.0 B 191.0 WB/R A 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 WB LOS A B B NB/LT D 109.0 E 272.0 D 155.0 NB/R A 37.0 A 45.0 A 50.0 NB LOS C D C SB/LT D 150.0 E 265.0 E 219.0 SB/R A 58.0 A 65.0 A 57.0 SB LOS C C C Overall LOS B C B Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Grocery Avenue Signalized EB/L A 25.0 A 47.0 A 43.0 EB/T A 35.0 A 63.0 A 1 38.0 EB LOS A A A WB/T B 166.0 B 171.0 B 148.0 WB/R A 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 WB LOS B B A SB/L C 34.0 C 78.0 D 75.0 SB/R A 42.0 A 72.0 A 71.0 SB LOS B B B Overall LOS A A A PHPl� * Assumed 25 feet Vehicle Length Minimum queue length assumed to be 25 feet EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Left, T:Thru, R: Right A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 10 0 0 TRIP GENERATION • U PHR+A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7t1i Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 4 is provided to summarize the total trip generation associated with the proposed development. Table 4 Proposed Development: Ervin - Senseny Road Property Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Out Hour Total In PM Peak Out Hour Total ADT In SAT Peak Out Hour Total ADT 853 Conwn. Man Mpumps 4,000 SF 91 91 182 121 121 242 3,382 116 107 222 5,794 881 Phannaeyw/DT 12,900SF 20 15 34 54 57 111 1,137 51 51 101 1,137 912 Drive-in Bank 8,000 SF 55 43 99 183 183 366 1,716 151 145 297 629 Sub Total 166 149 315 359 361 720 6,235 318 303 620 7,560 40% Pass -by (Code 853) 36 36 73 48 48 97 1,353 44 44 89 2,318 Total "New Trips" 1 130 113 242 1 310 312 623 1 4,882 1 273 258 531 5,243 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed site. PHR+A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed Ervin- Senseny Road Property development trips (Table 4) throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 7 shows the development - generated AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour trips and ADT assignments. Figure 7a is provided to illustrate the pass -by trip reduction. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Ervin- Senseny Road Property assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2010 build -out weekday and Saturday ADT as well as weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 9 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour levels of service. Table 5 shows the 95th percentile back of queue and levels of service for each lane group during 2010 build - out conditions. All Synchro levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. PHRn A Revised Traffic Impact Anal sy is of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 1 1 0 0 • • • No Scale -{- Figure 6 PHIZ1� Trip Distribution Percentages A Revised Tra is Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 12 0 L_ • No Scale w W 7«�1352 II(31)1261 182)(93)39� i' '. �Ei CN Figure 7 PHIUA 0 65 Oft" 0� p'S''13 f3xll�s 81f9s1 A b N y N v q ­ny f141002 "So1(I7o) 6`' ~SI(I4I)f1161 I966 � � 4 2S3p e �� SITE 1 Saturday ADT ATNA Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Negative trips denote pass -by trips Development -Generated Trip Assignments A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Properly Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 13 0 r� L • • No Scale Figure 7a PHRn v Q 657 0 f I3)C,IS),ll �%� f 3�3 fl3j(IS)II� A v h ti r `nyR01d f 13)C•1S U 0 0 fl31Cl ti 0 4 0 ^ Q 0 69S i7 SITE 1391 1 %-4(5)141 Site Dr #1 1 � 232 v �* ,n A u � y 0 3 C (� Saturday ADT AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Pass -by Trips A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 14 • • No Scale N N r 1uW41 w In w Ww_. 77(43 s)C1201 8IC18S)�)6�IV [2271(294)174.,,,%t [432](471)25 I341(82)52 Scn w00 M n r o0 M N M � G v o C31SI(26 \ 31g1(41p)'19 \0 C411(46)24 ` / ]' t I �i3(62)C7S) 5p�1�Yl;j 41 Set, `J69 C6p 1(639 [ISp7(77 ��6 y ~ 477(7Sp)C6971 0 oc � t U 4 '�' 12Sg2 w y q N �280 SITE 2S3o A y 1 �.32(83)[691 Site Dr #1 1 Saturday ADT A AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Figure 8 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 15 0 • • C7 • No Scale Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" LOS = B(C)[C] NB - 1 Left* ff 616 n n A(CjfUl ic](oJB� 1A f 6 Signalized a Intersection C LOS = B(D)[C] lC](D)B Unsignalized 1 �. Intersection Site Dr #1 Right In/Right Out only 0 w v c c New 3 � Intersection" a; 0 SITE Unsignalized Intersection Signalized RightIn/Right Out only Intersection LOS = B(B)[B] �? 4 � "New Intersection" "New Intersection" AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)[Saturday Peak Hour] Funding for improvements have yet to be identified Figure 9 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PHIUA A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 16 • • Table 5 Levels of Service and Back of Queue (95%) Results 2010 Build -out Conditions (w/ suggested improvements) Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Greenwood Road (Rt 656) Signalized EB/L A 81.0 C 231.0 B 116.0 EB/TR B 206.0 C 501.0 C 349.0 EB LOS B C C WB/L A 25.0 C 105.0 B 38.0 WB/T B 124.0 C 332.0 B 228.0 WB/R A 25.0 A 45.0 A 32.0 WB LOS A C B NB/L C 63.0 D 1311.0 C 75.0 NB/T C 74.0 C 159.0 C 129.0 NB/R A 34.0 A 43.0 A 46.0 NB LOS C C B SB/LT D 175.0 E 359.0 D 315.0 SB/R A 54.0 A 109.0 A-7 52.0 SB LOS C C C Overall LOS B C C Greenwood Road (Rt 656) & Site-Drive#1 Unsignalized (Right In/Out Only) WB/R - - - NB/TR SB/T Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Site-Drive#2 Unsignalized (Right In/Out Only) EB/T EB/R WB/T NB/R - Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Site -Drive #3/Grocery Avenue Signalized EB/L A 31.0 A 65.0 A 83.0 EB/T A 45.0 A 101.0 A 83.0 EB/R A 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 EB LOS A A A WB/L B 38.0 C 103.0 B 65.0 WB/T B 183.0 C 230.0 B 167.0 WB/R A 25.0 A 28.0 A 25.0 WB LOS B C B NB/L C 72.0 C 150.0 D 134.0 NB/TR A 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 NB LOS C C C SB/LT C 35.0 C 72.0 C 73.0 SB/R A 42.0 A 63.0 A 66.0 SB LOS B B B Overall LOS B B B PHIS * Assumed 25 feel Vehicle Length Mininnun queue length assumed to be 25 feet EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Soulhboand, L: Left, T:Thru, R: Right A Reviser! Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 17 0 0 • • CONCLUSION Based upon Synchro analysis results, assuming the suggested improvements, all the study area intersections of the proposed Ervin — Senseny Road Property development will maintain acceptable level of service "C" or better during 2010 build -out conditions. The intersection of Greenwood Road (Route 656)/Senseny Road (Route 657) will require a northbound left -turn lane in order to maintain acceptable level of service "C". The following reiterates the improvements recommended for the intersection of Greenwood Road (Route 656)/Senseny Road (Route 657): • Greenwood Road (Route 656)/Senseny Road(Route 657): In order to achieve level of service "C" during 2010 build -out conditions, this intersection will require a northbound left -turn lane. NOTE: Funding source for the northbound left -turn lane have yet to be identified. The applicant will work with VDOT/County to accommodate pedestrian and bicycle facilities adjacent to the site. PR+AH A Revised Tia tc Inipact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 18 0 • • • 2016 "DESIGN YEAR" ANALYSES 2016 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS To obtain 2016 base conditions, PHR+A applied an annual growth rate of 1.0% (compounded) to the existing traffic volumes through year 2016. Additionally, all trips relating to specific future "other developments" located within the vicinity of the proposed development were included. Using the 7lh Edition of Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Table 6 to summarize the 2016 background developments. Table 6 2016 "Other Developments" Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount ANI Peak ]lour I'M Peak flour ,DT SAT Peak flour, SD,F In Out Total In Out Total In Out 'Total Butcher Property 210 Single -Family Detached 65 units 14 41 55 46 27 73 650 37 32 69 702 Total 14 41 55 46 27 73 650 37 32 69 702 Fieldstone 210 Single -Family Detached 63 units 13 40 54 45 25 71 630 36 31 67 682 230 Townhouse 207 units 24 81 105 86 49 135 1,352 63 56 121 1,369 Total 37 121 159 131 74 206 1,982 99 87 188 2,051 Lambert -Ward Property 210 Single -Family Detached 145 units 28 83 111 94 55 I50 1,450 76 64 140 1,492 230 Townhouse/Condo 140 units 16 54 71 58 33 91 912 43 38 82 923 Total 44 137 182 152 88 241 2,362 119 102 222 2415 Abrams Pointe 210 Single -Family Detached 225 units 42 125 167 140 82 222 2,250 114 97 211 2,256 Total 42 125 167 140 82 222 2,250 114 97 211 2,256 Brairwood III 210 Single -Family Detached 69 units 14 43 58 48 28 77 690 39 33 72 743 Total 14 43 58 48 28 77 690 39 33 72 743 I11isc Other Developments along Charming Driver 210 Single -Family Detached 870 units 155 464 618 473 278 751 8,700 424 361 785 8,042 230 Townhouse/Condo 130 units 15 5o 66 54 31 85 847 40 35 76 857 820 Retail 120,000 SF 107 68 175 339 367 706 7,645 507 468 974 10,364 Total 276 582 859 866 676 1,542 17,192 971 864 1,836 19 263 Orrick Property 251 Elderly Housing - Detach 75 units 8 14 22 24 16 40 424 10 11 20 208 252 Elderly Housing - Attach 100 units 4 4 8 7 4 11 348 15 15 30 251 565 Day Cate 6,000 SF 41 36 77 32 36 68 476 6 4 to 37 710 Office 25,000 SF 54 7 62 18 89 107 459 6 6 12 72 820 Retail 80,200 SF 84 53 137 260 281 541 5,884 390 360 750 8,041 881 Pharmacy w/DT 15,000 SF 23 17 40 63 66 129 1,322 59 59 118 1,322 912 Drive-in Bank 6,000 SF 41 33 74 137 137 274 1,351 113 109 222 456 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 76 44 120 950 932 H-T Restaurant 6,000 SF 36 33 69 40 26 66 763 76 44 120 950 Total 1 327 231 558 1 622 680 1,302 1 11789 1 751 651 1,403 1 12,288 PHPA+ A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis �is of the Ervin - Sensenv Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 19 0 • r1 • 0 TRIP GENERATION The trip generation associated with the proposed Ervin — Senseny Road Property remains consistent with Table 4 of the "2010 Trip Generation" (Page 11). TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trips and the corresponding development -generated weekday AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT as well as Saturday mid -day peak hour trips and ADT remain consistent with Figure 6 (Page 12), Figure 7 (Page 13) and Figure 7a (Page 14), respectively, of 2010 build -out traffic conditions. 2016 DESIGN YEAR CONDITIONS The Ervin — Senseny Road Property assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2016 background traffic volumes to obtain 2016 design year conditions. Figure 10 shows the 2016 design year weekday and Saturday ADT as well as the weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour traffic volumes at key locations within the study area. Figure 11 shows the respective 2016 design year weekday AM/PM peak hour and Saturday mid -day peak hour levels of service and lane geometry. PHR+A has provided Table 7 to show the 2016 design year weekday AM/PM and Saturday mid -day peak hour levels of service and 95th percentile back of queue for each lane group. All Synchro level of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. PR+AH A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 20 C� • • C] E No Scale [280](361)199 ..# [6901(720)336 w.w� [361(87)55 N u A H 1 *-!:�q1 3(1,y [18 ~` 179 (62)f64 4) 1 (287) fz951 ■ � Sari N � � �l N3.3 65 �C> ^64062)f7s, 79011(261)137�� �`5p(!0 )f951 oI fvo1(s64)3s3 f41J(46) ti M �M V V N1 '9 a fl OI(17)76 ry 7�(1101)f1123) y 4 � �2pll 257. b SITE %.32(83)[69] Q~� Saturday A + n AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) [Sat Peak Hour] Figure 10 2016 Design Year Traffic Conditions p ][- AA Revised Traffic Impact Analysis �is of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 21 • • No Scale Signalized r Intersection LOS = C(F)[F] n [FI(F)c � I Unsignalized Intersection Right In/Right Out only Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" EB - 1 Thru* LOS = B( C)[ C] wB - I Thru* NB - 1 Left* n SB - 1 Left* ICI(p)Cf 657 656 e(Fj(Fj Sensen Unsignalized Intersection Signalized Y @o a� +d Right In/Right Out only ,c' Intersection n 657 Q LOS = B(C)[C] t� r w qICICBjq *ftw* y 4 SITE * Site Dr #1 Y "New Intersection" "New Intersection" "New Inlcrseclion" AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)[Saturday Peak Hour] A * Funding for improvements have yet to be identified Figure 11 2016 Design Year Lane Geometry and Levels of Service P A Revised Tragic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - SensenY Rona! Properly H_?Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 22 • • • Table 7 Levels of Service and Back of Queue (95%) Results 2016 Design Year Conditions (w/ suggested improvements) Intersection Traffic Control Lane Group/ Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour SAT Peak Hour LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue LOS Back of Queue Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Greenwood Road (Rt 656) Signalized EB/L B 113.0 D 352.0 C 188.0 EBfI C 133.0 D 354.0 D 323.0 EB/TR Ell LOS C D C WB/L B 86.0 E 309.0 D 256.0 WBfr-Lane 1 C 197.0 C 265.0 C 274.0 WBfI-Lane 2 WB/R A 69.0 A 27.0 A 25.0 WB LOS B C C NB/L C 69.0 D 152.0 D 93.0 NB/T C 94.0 D 279.0 D 225.0 NB/R A 45.0 A 73.0 A 79.0 NB LOS B C C SB/L C 95.0 F 319.0 D 207.0 SB/T C 120.0 C 144.0 C 166.0 SB/R A 53.0 A 120.0 A 57.0 SB LOS B C C Overall LOS B C C 1656) & Greenwood Road (Rt ttl Site-Drive Unsignalized (Right In/Out Only) WB/R - - - NB/TR SBIT Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Site-Drive#2 Unsignalized (Ri Only Out EBfr EB/R WBfI NB/R - - Senseny Road (Rt 657) & Site -Drive #3/Grocery Avenue Signalized EB/L A 31.0 B 94.0 E 315.0 EB/T A 76.0 B 192.0 B 243.0 EB/R A 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 Ell LOS A B C WB/L A 30.0 F 197.0 D 141.0 WBff B 366.0 C 539.0 C 615.0 WB/R A 25.0 A 34.0 A 39.0 WB LOS B C C NB/L D 77.0 D 195.0 D 150.0 NB/TR A 25.0 A 25.0 A 25.0 NB LOS C D C SB/LT D 37.0 D 88.0 D 82.0 SB/R B 45.0 A 74.0 A I81.0 SB LOS B B B Overall LOS B C C PHPA * Assumed 25 feet Vehicle Length Minimum queue length assumed to be 25 feel EB = Eastbound, WB =Westbound, NB = Northbound, SB = Southbound, L: Left, T:Thru, R: Right A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 23 0 • • • 2016 "DESIGN YEAR" CONCLUSION Based upon Synchro analysis results, assuming the suggested improvements, all the study area intersections of the proposed Ervin — Senseny Road Property development will maintain acceptable level of service "C" or better during 2016 design year traffic conditions. The intersection of Greenwood Road (Route 656)/Senseny Road (Route 657) will require an eastbound through lane, a westbound through lane, a northbound left -turn lane and a southbound left -turn lane in order to maintain acceptable level of service "C". The following reiterates the improvements recommended for the intersection of Greenwood Road (Route 656)/Senseny Road (Route 657): • Greenwood Road (Route 656)/Senseny Road(Route 657): In order to achieve level of service "C" during 2016 design year traffic conditions, this intersection will require an eastbound through lane, a westbound through lane, a northbound left -turn lane and a southbound left -turn lane. NOTE: Funding source for the aforementioned improvements have yet to be identified. PHRn A Revised Traffic Impact Analysis of the Ervin - Senseny Road Property Project Number: 15270-1-0 October 8, 2008 Page 24 • • APPENDIX • r� u 0 E Conceptual Plan 0 0 • • • 0 _ - - PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Telephone (540)662-5792 CONSULTING Facsimile (540)662-5793 ENGINEERS Email: off ice®painterlewis.com • Synchro Worksheets 0 0 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/8/2008 Lane Group ----BL---------------------------------------------------------------------------- E EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBbq Lane Configurations 4 r Volume (vph) 166 126 50 16 175 87 40 58 19 45 105 219 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.957 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.980 0.985 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1783 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1825 1583 0 1835 1583 Fit Permitted 0.567 0.634 0.686 0.860 Satd. Flow (perm) 1056 1783 0 1181 1863 1583 0 1278 1583 0 1602 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 97 21 243 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 184 140 56 18 194 97 44 64 21 50 117 243 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 184 196 0 18 194 97 0 108 21 0 167 243 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/8/2008 bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 68.0 0.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (%) 22.2% 75.6% 0.0% 53.3% 53.3% 53.3% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% Maximum Green (s) 14.0 62.0 42.0 42.0 42.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 64.5 64.5 49.9 49.9 49.9 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.55 0.55 0.55 0.15 0.15 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.15 0.03 0.19 0.11 0.56 0.08 0.70 0.55 Control Delay 5.1 3.6 11.0 11.6 2.9 46.6 13.9 51.4 9.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.1 3.6 11.0 11.6 2.9 46.6 13.9 51.4 9.6 LOS A A B B A D B D A Approach Delay 4.3 8.8 41.3 26.6 Approach LOS A A D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 29 23 4 53 0 57 0 90 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 54 46 16 99 23 108 20 154 62 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 868 1292 655 1033 921 227 299 285 481 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.15 0.03 0.19 0.11 0.48 0.07 0.59 0.51 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 48.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _AM 40 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/8/2008 Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd o2 o4 o5 06 t 08 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ + r 4 r 4 r Volume (vph) 279 197 80 23 208 61 74 154 27 89 114 336 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.957 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.984 0.979 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1783 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1833 1583 0 1824 1583 Fit Permitted 0.512 0.573 0.667 0.568 Satd. Flow (perm) 954 1783 0 1067 1863 1583 0 1242 1583 0 1058 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 36 68 30 373 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 310 219 89 26 231 68 82 171 30 99 127 373 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 310 308 0 26 231 68 0 253 30 0 226 373 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 .4 ---0. --* f- 4- 4\ t / �► 4/ ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 55.0 0.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 61.1% 0.0% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 49.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 56.1 56.1 38.9 38.9 38.9 21.9 21.9 21.9 21.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.62 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.27 0.06 0.29 0.09 0.84 0.07 0.88 0.56 Control Delay 11.3 8.6 18.9 19.9 5.6 54.7 8.6 63.9 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.3 8.6 18.9 19.9 5.6 54.7 8.6 63.9 6.2 LOS B A B B A D A E A Approach Delay 9.9 16.8 49.8 28.0 Approach LOS A B D C • Queue Length 50th (ft) 75 64 9 87 0 135 0 122 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 144 129 27 156 27 206 19 #198 61 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 702 1125 461 805 723 400 530 341 763 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.27 0.06 0.29 0.09 0.63 0.06 0.66 0.49 )ntersection Summary-- _--- -- -- -- --------- ------- Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10171200s Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _SAT 3: Sen_seny Rd & Greenwood Rd 101712008 ame Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBf3 Lane Configurations T+ + Volume (vph) 215 147 33 14 195 67 31 118 28 70 138 225 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.972 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.983 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1811 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1844 1583 0 1831 1583 Fit Permitted 0.539 0.632 0.804 0.772 Satd. Flow (perm) 1004 1811 0 1177 1863 1583 0 1498 1583 0 1438 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 20 74 31 250 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 239 163 37 16 217 74 34 131 31 78 153 250 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 239 200 0 16 217 74 0 165 31 0 231 250 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 20.0 56.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (%) 22.2% 62.2% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 37.8% 37.8% 37.8% 37.8% 37.8% 37.8% Maximum Green (s) 14.0 50.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 59.1 59.1 42.4 42.4 42.4 18.9 18.9 18.9 18.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.17 0.03 0.25 0.09 0.52 0.09 0.76 0.47 Control Delay 8.4 6.7 17.4 17.7 5.4 36.5 9.4 49.2 6.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.4 6.7 17.4 17.7 5.4 36.5 9.4 49.2 6.7 LOS A A B B A D A D A Approach Delay 7.6 14.7 32.2 27.1 Approach LOS A B C C • Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 34 5 70 0 84 0 125 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 101 78 20 151 28 132 20 186 54 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 781 1196 554 877 784 466 514 447 665 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.31 0.17 0.03 0.25 0.09 0.35 0.06 0.52 0.38 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property Existing Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/200s 1] 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 9 � 0 E 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 101712008 r0� �► 1 ane Grou EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBA Lane Configurations Vi T t r *T r +T r* Volume (vph) 174 216 52 70 260 90 41 66 82 46 113 228 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.971 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.981 0.986 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1809 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1827 1583 0 1837 1583 Fit Permitted 0.517 0.578 0.683 0.861 Satd. Flow (perm) 963 1809 0 1077 1863 1583 0 1272 1583 0 1604 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 19 100 91 253 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 240 58 78 289 100 46 73 91 51 126 253 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 298 0 78 289 100 0 119 91 0 177 253 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 -,� 'r '~ k- t 1 ./ a� ne Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 50.0 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 55.6% 0.0% 13.3% 48.9% 48.9% 31.1 % 31.1 % 31.1 % 31.1 % 31.1 % 31.1 % Maximum Green (s) 12.0 44.0 6.0 38.0 38.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 60.5 52.7 54.3 47.8 47.8 15.1 15.1 15.1 15.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.59 0.60 0.53 0.53 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.26 0.28 0.11 0.29 0.11 0.56 0.27 0.66 0.53 Control Delay 6.4 11.2 5.4 10.4 1.4 43.3 8.6 45.9 8.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.4 11.2 5.4 10.4 1.4 43.3 8.6 45.9 8.4 LOS A B A B A D A D A Approach Delay 9.3 7.6 28.3 23.9 Approach LOS A A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 32 77 12 55 0 63 0 95 0 • Queue Length 95th (ft) 70 149 23 98 8 109 37 150 58 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 776 1067 700 989 887 311 456 392 578 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.25 0.28 0.11 0.29 0.11 0.38 0.20 0,45 0.44 nt�ection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 • 0 9 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10171200s splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd T o1 - o2 o4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 *-- 4,, �► Lane Group ^ EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR i Lane Configurations + t r '� r Volume (vph) 137 207 323 33 23 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.505 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 941 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 37 108 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 346 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 230 359 37 26 108 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 230 359 37 26 108 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm custom Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR -^ -- ---- -- -- - Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 67.0 55.0 55.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 74.4% 61.1 % 61.1 % 25.6% 25.6% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 61.0 49.0 49.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 61.0 61.0 49.0 49.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.54 0.54 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.18 0.35 0.04 0.08 0.28 Control Delay 4.4 3.9 12.8 3.5 30.9 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.4 3.9 12.8 3.5 30.9 8.6 LOS A A B A C A Approach Delay 4.1 11.9 13.0 Approach LOS A B B Queue Length 50th (ft) 14 21 108 0 12 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 25 35 166 13 34 42 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 266 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 Base Capacity (vph) 693 1263 1014 879 334 387 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.18 0.35 0.04 0.08 0.28 nt� ersection Summary --------- --------------- ----- Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6013T, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.35 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 44.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 101712a08 Splits and Phases: 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue o2 06 05 o4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 ane Group EBL EBT EBR W13 WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations T+ t r *T r r Volume (vph) 294 378 82 154 392 63 76 171 153 92 131 353 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.973 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.980 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1812 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1835 1583 0 1825 1583 Fit Permitted 0.358 0.349 0.646 0.555 Satd. Flow (perm) 667 1812 0 650 1863 1583 0 1203 1583 0 1034 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 16 56 170 392 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 327 420 91 171 436 70 84 190 170 102 146 392 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 511 0 171 436 70 0 274 170 0 248 392 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 i 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 t �*" 1' ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 46.0 0.0 12.0 44.0 44.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 51.1% 0.0% 13.3% 48.9% 48.9% 35.6% 35.6% 35.6% 35.6% 35.6% 35.6% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 40.0 6.0 38.0 38.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 51.1 42.1 46.2 39.7 39.7 23.4 23.4 23.4 23.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.47 0.51 0.44 0.44 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 We Ratio 0.67 0.60 0.41 0.53 0.10 0.88 0.32 0.93 0.56 Control Delay 18.9 21.4 10.1 16.1 3.3 60.1 5.8 71.8 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.9 21.4 10.1 16.1 3.3 60.1 5.8 71.8 6.2 LOS B C B B A E A E A Approach Delay 20.4 13.2 39.3 31.6 Approach LOS C B D C Queue Length 50th (ft) 89 210 33 114 2 143 0 131 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #147 317 45 181 m8 #272 45 #265 65 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 488 856 415 822 730 348 578 299 736 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.67 0.60 0.41 0.53 0.10 0.79 0.29 0.83 0.53 ntersection Summary ---- - -- T----� -- ----� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.1 % ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 • 0 • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 101712008 splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 01 --*02 06 04 08 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 9 9 E • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 ---- 41, Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Lane Configurations I t fi F I F Volume (vph) 261 362 323 62 68 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.501 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 933 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 69 318 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 364 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 290 402 359 69 76 318 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 402 359 69 76 318 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm custom Protected Phases 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 ---------- �ne Group EBL EBT --------- WBT WBR SBL ---------------- SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 68.0 54.0 54.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 75.6% 60.0% 60.0% 24.4% 24.4% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 62.0 48.0 48.0 16.0 16.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 62.0 62.0 48.0 48.0 16.0 16.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.53 0.53 0.18 0.18 We Ratio 0.40 0.31 0.36 0.08 0.24 0.59 Control Delay 5.2 4.1 13.5 3.0 34.2 8.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.2 4.1 13.5 3.0 34.2 8.9 LOS A A B A C A Approach Delay 4.6 11.8 13.8 Approach LOS A B B • Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 46 111 0 38 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m47 m63 171 19 78 72 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 284 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 Base Capacity (vph) 717 1283 994 876 315 543 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.40 0.31 0.36 0.08 0.24 0.59 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6013T, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/200s n LJ • • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions -SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 0 --* --,, -,* 'e, 4\ t -1/ bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi T I + r *T r +T r Volume (vph) 227 350 34 140 373 68 32 135 174 71 154 236 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.987 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.990 0.984 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1839 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1844 1583 0 1833 1583 Flt Permitted 0.381 0.462 0.775 0.737 Satd. Flow (perm) 710 1839 0 861 1863 1583 0 1444 1583 0 1373 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 7 60 193 262 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 252 389 38 156 414 76 36 150 193 79 171 262 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 252 427 0 156 414 76 0 186 193 0 250 262 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 ane Group EBL _EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR^ SBL SBT SBf. Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 48.0 0.0 12.0 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.1% 53.3% 0.0% 13.3% 45.6% 45.6% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 42.0 6.0 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 55.7 45.4 48.5 41.6 41.6 19.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.62 0.50 0.54 0.46 0.46 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 v/c Ratio 0.45 0.46 0.29 0.48 0.10 0.59 0.39 0.83 0.47 Control Delay 10.1 17.1 8.2 16.4 4.2 38.5 6.5 55.9 6.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 10.1 17.1 8.2 16.4 4.2 38.5 6.5 55.9 6.6 LOS B B A B A D A E A Approach Delay 14.5 13.0 22.2 30.7 Approach LOS B B C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 156 31 114 3 94 0 135 0 • Queue Length 95th (ft) 99 243 46 191 m10 155 50 #219 57 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 609 931 533 862 764 385 564 366 614 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.41 0.46 0.29 0.48 0.10 0.48 0.34 0.68 0.43 ntersection Summary --�- - ---- - T------ --- --^� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 19.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 73.1% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 0 i Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/200s • • • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment • Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR t t r I r 315 280 308 75 65 274 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 150 100 0 0 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.850 0.850 0.950 0.950 1770 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 0.525 0.950 978 1863 1863 1583 1770 1583 Yes Yes 83 304 45 45 45 400 364 295 6.1 5.5 4.5 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 350 311 342 83 72 304 350 311 342 83 72 304 No No No No No No Left Left Left Right Left Right 12 12 12 0 0 0 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 1 2 2 1 1 1 Left Thru Thru Right Left Right 20 100 100 20 20 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 6 20 20 20 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 94 6 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 pm+pt Perm custom 5 2 6 2 6 4 4 5 2 6 6 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 •- .� Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SBL SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 69.0 57.0 57.0 21.0 21.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 76.7% 63.3% 63.3% 23.3% 23.3% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 63.0 51.0 51.0 15.0 15.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 63.0 63.0 51.0 51.0 15.0 15.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.70 0.70 0.57 0.57 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio OR 0.24 0.32 0.09 6.24 0.59 Control Delay 5.6 3.0 11.4 2.4 35.1 9.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.6 3.0 11.4 2.4 35.1 9.3 LOS A A B A D A Approach Delay 4.3 9.6 14.3 Approach LOS A A B • Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 24 96 0 36 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 43 38 148 19 75 71 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 284 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 Base Capacity (vph) 737 1304 1056 933 295 517 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.24 0.32 0.09 0.24 0.59 )ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 8.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 E i Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Background Conditions —SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 101712008 • • • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 .�--- 4\ t # ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r Volume (vph) 174 255 52 81 277 112 58 78 82 85 113 228 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.974 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.979 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1814 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1824 1583 0 1824 1583 Fit Permitted 0.489 0.553 0.601 0.769 Satd. Flow (perm) 911 1814 0 1030 1863 1583 0 1120 1583 0 1432 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 15 124 91 253 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 283 58 90 308 124 64 87 91 94 126 253 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 341 0 90 308 124 0 151 91 0 220 253 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 1017/2008 r --1,. 7 'e, 4- 4\ 7 Lane Group f T EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR _ NBL �NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 47.0 0.0 12.0 42.0 42.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 52.2% 0.0% 13.3% 46.7% 46.7% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 41.0 6.0 36.0 36.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 56.9 49.1 51.0 44.3 44.3 18.6 18.6 18.6 18.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.55 0.57 0.49 0.49 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.34 0.14 0.34 0.15 0.65 0.23 0.74 0.48 Control Delay 8.1 14.2 5.7 10.3 1.4 45.2 7.3 48.1 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.1 14.2 5.7 10.3 1.4 45.2 7.3 48.1 6.9 LOS A B A B A D A D A Approach Delay 12.0 7.4 31.0 26.1 Approach LOS B A C C . Queue Length 50th (ft) 37 104 11 67 0 79 0 118 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 79 188 19 118 11 133 35 181 55 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 691 996 639 917 842 311 505 398 622 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.34 0.14 0.34 0.15 0.49 0.18 0.55 0.41 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 ICI • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/200s ;plliit^s and Phases: 3: ■ 01 -► 0; 05 06 Rd & Greenwood Rd t 08 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 f t I ,� ane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT j Lane Configurations r T t Volume (vph) 0 32 186 17 0 246 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.989 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 36 207 19 0 273 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 36 226 0 0 273 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Yes No No Yes Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • C • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd rr T r''► 1 2010 Build -out Conditions AM 10/7/2008 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 0 32 186 17 0 246 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 36 207 19 0 273 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 vC, conflicting volume 489 216 226 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 438 216 226 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 96 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 548 824 1343 direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 36 226 273 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 36 19 0 cSH 824 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.13 0.16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A Intersection Summary Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 Lane Configurations T r t r Volume (vph) 346 76 0 471 0 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 384 84 0 523 0 38 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 384 84 0 523 0 38 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 • —. Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 346 76 0 471 0 34 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 384 84 0 523 0 38 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 0.90 0.93 vC, conflicting volume 469 908 384 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 395 676 305 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 94 cM capacity (veh/h) 1086 377 686 - ------ Direction, Lane # ----------------------- EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 -- NB 1 ----- - -------------------- Volume Total 384 84 523 38 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 84 0 38 cSH 1700 1700 1700 686 Volume to Capacity 0.23 0.05 0.31 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.6 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.6 Approach LOS B ntersection Summary Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 8: Sense_ny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBf Lane Configurations + r '� t r T* Volume (vph) 137 219 24 50 312 33 62 0 22 23 0 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.498 0.608 0.740 0.742 Satd. Flow (perm) 928 1863 1583 1133 1863 1583 1378 1583 0 0 1382 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 37 691 108 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 219 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 3.3 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 243 27 56 347 37 69 0 24 26 0 108 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 243 27 56 347 37 69 24 0 0 26 108 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right . Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 67.0 67.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 74.4% 74.4% 55.6% 55.6% 55.6% 25.6% 25.6% 0.0% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 61.0 61.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 We Ratio 0.21 0.19 0.02 0.10 0.38 0.05 0.27 0.03 0.10 0.28 Control Delay 5.4 5.0 1.6 13.1 16.0 4.3 34.4 0.0 31.4 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.4 5.0 1.6 13.1 16.0 4.3 34.4 0.0 31.4 8.6 LOS A A A B B A C A C A Approach Delay 4.9 14.7 25.5 13.1 Approach LOS A B C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 19 31 1 16 118 0 34 0 12 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 50 m5 38 183 15 72 0 35 42 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 139 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 732 1263 1082 554 911 793 260 859 261 387 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.19 0.02 0.10 0.38 0.05 0.27 0.03 0.10 0.28 ntersection Summary ---- --_ ---- -- T - -- --- - - - -- Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 88 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 0 0 �J • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10171200s Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 0 .1-4 'r *-- 4\ t /,P. \IN. 4/ bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 294 471 82 185 439 125 123 202 153 185 131 353 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 90 100 100 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.978 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.981 0.972 Said. Flow (prot) 1770 1822 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1827 1583 0 1811 1583 Flt Permitted 0.146 0.154 0.555 0.472 Satd. Flow (perm) 272 1822 0 287 1863 1583 0 1034 1583 0 879 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 80 170 301 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 327 523 91 206 488 139 137 224 170 206 146 392 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 614 0 206 488 139 0 361 170 0 352 392 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 • --* --► - sir 'e - " \ t I* 1 * .---------- Lane Group------------- roup - ,---- EBL EBT - EBR - -- WBL WBT ----- WBR NBL - - NBT NBR SBL SBT -- SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 40.0 0.0 12.0 34.0 34.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 19.6% 43.5% 0.0% 13.0% 37.0% 37.0% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% 43.5% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 34.0 6.0 28.0 28.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 46.0 34.0 34.0 28.0 28.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.37 0.37 0.30 0.30 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.90 1.01 0.86 0.26 0.95 0.25 1.08 0.51 Control Delay 68.8 45.9 88.2 36.6 6.8 64.6 4.2 104.6 8.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 68.8 45.9 88.2 36.6 6.8 64.6 4.2 104.6 8.1 LOS E D F D A E A F A Approach Delay 53.9 44.4 45.3 53.8 Approach LOS D D D D Queue Length 50th (ft) 127 328 -61 185 14 200 0 -232 35 Queue Length 95th (ft) #302 #539 #202 #429 56 #379 40 #402 110 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 331 680 203 567 537 382 692 325 775 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.99 0.90 1.01 0.86 0.26 0.95 0.25 1.08 0.51 ntersection Summary i Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 92 Actuated Cycle Length: 92 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Signal Delay: 49.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.6% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 E 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/200s Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 01 —"*' 02 o4 10 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 • 'r 4�- Lane Configurations r 'i� t Volume (vph) 0 83 395 36 0 398 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.989 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 At Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 92 439 40 0 442 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 479 0 0 442 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Yes No No Yes Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free jntersection Summary^ -- -- -- ---- - —T -.---- — __� Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 ovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations ]" 1� T Volume (veh/h) 0 83 395 36 0 398 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 92 439 40 0 442 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.91 vC, conflicting volume 901 459 479 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 844 459 479 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 85 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 305 602 1083 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB Volume Total 92 479 442 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 92 40 0 cSH 602 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.28 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 0 0 Control Delay (s) 12.1 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 12.1 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B ntersection Summary � Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 101712008 -101 - r� amine Group-------^EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR— --^ ---- -----� Lane Configurations if + r Volume (vph) 639 170 0 750 0 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 At Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 710 189 0 833 0 86 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 710 189 0 833 0 86 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop '— ---- ------ -- --—-------- ------ -- ---------------- 'Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 -4. _ (Movemen_t ------ — EBT EBR -- WBL WBT NBL NBR---------- -------_--� Lane Configurations + + r Volume (veh/h) 639 170 0 750 0 77 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 710 189 0 833 0 86 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.72 0.83 0.72 vC, conflicting volume 899 1543 710 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 664 969 401 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 82 cM capacity (veh/h) 665 232 467 Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total 710 189 833 86 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 189 0 86 cSH 1700 1700 1700 467 Volume to Capacity 0.42 0.11 0.49 0.18 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 17 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.4 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 14.4 Approach LOS B intersection Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 } I bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r + Vii T 4 r Volume (vph) 261 410 46 108 309 62 155 0 46 68 0 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 At Permitted 0.454 0.411 0.708 0.724 Satd. Flow (perm) 846 1863 1583 766 1863 1583 1319 1583 0 0 1349 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 64 415 318 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 219 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 3.3 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 290 456 51 120 343 69 172 0 51 76 0 318 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 456 51 120 343 69 172 51 0 0 76 318 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 j ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT So Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 62.0 62.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 22.8% 67.4% 67.4% 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 32.6% 32.6% 0.0% 32.6% 32.6% 32.6% Maximum Green (s) 15.0 56.0 56.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.05 0.41 0.48 0.11 0.50 0.07 0.22 0.49 Control Delay 8.7 7.0 1.1 26.4 24.5 6.1 34.9 0.2 28.7 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.7 7.0 1.1 26.4 24.5 6.1 34.9 0.2 28.7 6.2 LOS A A A C C A C A C A Approach Delay 7.2 22.5 26.9 10.5 Approach LOS A C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 47 75 0 50 149 2 85 0 35 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m53 m82 m1 103 230 28 150 0 72 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 139 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 666 1134 984 291 709 642 344 720 352 648 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.05 0.41 0.48 0.11 0.50 0.07 0.22 0.49 ----- ------ ntersec6on_ S_um_ mary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 92 Actuated Cycle Length: 92 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 11 r • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 101712008 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Lane Group - EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT _ SBR Lane Configurations t r Volume (vph) 227 432 34 166 411 120 70 161 174 153 154 236 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.989 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.985 0.976 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1842 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1835 1583 0 1818 1583 FIt Permitted 0.290 0.299 0.608 0.609 Satd. Flow (perm) 540 1842 0 557 1863 1583 0 1133 1583 0 1134 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 92 193 262 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 252 480 38 184 457 133 78 179 193 170 171 262 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 252 518 0 184 457 133 0 257 193 0 341 262 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBL EBT ^ EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 15.0 42.0 0.0 12.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 46.7% 0.0% 13.3% 43.3% 43.3% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 9.0 36.0 6.0 33.0 33.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 46.0 37.1 40.8 34.5 34.5 28.6 28.6 28.6 28.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.51 0.41 0.45 0.38 0.38 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.63 0.68 0.55 0.64 0.20 0.71 0.30 0.94 0.38 Control Delay 19.6 27.3 14.4 21.1 3.8 39.1 4.8 67.0 4.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.6 27.3 14.4 21.1 3.8 39.1 4.8 67.0 4.7 LOS B C B C A D A E A Approach Delay 24.8 16.5 24.4 39.9 Approach LOS C B C D • Queue Length 50th (ft) 73 238 32 165 4 125 0 183 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 119 356 43 251 37 #220 45 #348 51 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 401 763 336 714 664 378 656 378 702 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.68 0.55 0.64 0.20 0.68 0.29 0.90 0.37 ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.1 % ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 . Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd • o5 I . 06 t 08 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 • � � I * 1� � I i Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r il� + Volume (vph) 0 69 336 32 0 354 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.988 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1840 0 0 1863 At Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1840 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 77 373 36 0 393 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 409 0 0 393 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Yes No No Yes Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 • Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 i � t Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T + Volume (veh/h) 0 69 336 32 0 354 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 77 373 36 0 393 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 vC, conflicting volume 784 391 409 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 733 391 409 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 88 100 . cM capacity (veh/h) 362 657 1150 — Direction, Lane # -WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 77 409 393 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 77 36 0 cSH 657 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.24 0.23 Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 —. *— )_ane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR i Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (vph) 609 150 0 697 0 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 677 167 0 774 0 72 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 677 167 0 774 0 72 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR I Lane Configurations + r T r Volume (veh/h) 609 150 0 697 0 65 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 677 167 0 774 0 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.88 0.80 vC, conflicting volume 843 1451 677 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 674 1014 464 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 85 • cM capacity (veh/h) 729 232 475 I nection, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 _ Volume Total 677 167 774 72 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 167 0 72 cSH 1700 1700 1700 475 Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.10 0.46 0.15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 13 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 13.9 Approach LOS B f ntersection Summary Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 0 1# --v 'e- 4-- k- 4\ t /0. \* Lane Configurations + r + r Vii T 4 r Volume (vph) 315 318 41 95 294 75 130 0 39 65 0 274 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 At Permitted 0.519 0.531 0.710 0.729 Satd. Flow (perm) 967 1863 1583 989 1863 1583 1323 1583 0 0 1358 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 46 83 546 304 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 219 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 3.3 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 350 353 46 106 327 83 144 0 43 72 0 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 353 46 106 327 83 144 43 0 0 72 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL� NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 65.0 65.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 72.2% 72.2% 56.7% 56.7% 56.7% 27.8% 27.8% 0.0% 27.8% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 59.0 59.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 We Ratio 0.50 0.29 0.04 0.21 0.35 0.10 0.52 0.06 0.25 0.53 Control Delay 7.5 5.3 1.1 14.1 15.0 3.2 39.0 0.1 32.4 7.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.5 5.3 1.1 14.1 15.0 3.2 39.0 0.1 32.4 7.5 LOS A A A B B A D A C A Approach Delay 6.1 12.9 30.1 12.3 Approach LOS A B C B • Queue Length 50th (ft) 50 50 0 32 107 0 73 0 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m69 m69 m2 65 167 22 134 0 73 66 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 139 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 705 1221 1054 495 932 833 279 765 287 574 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.29 0.04 0.21 0.35 0.10 0.52 0.06 0.25 0.53 Intersection Summary --- - ---- ----- - -- ---� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 0 0 • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 101712008 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 9 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -AM -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ t r I + r +1 � Volume (vph) 174 255 52 81 277 112 58 78 82 85 113 228 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 100 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.974 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1814 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 0 1824 1583 Fit Permitted 0.489 0.549 0.488 0.821 Satd. Flow (perm) 911 1814 0 1023 1863 1583 909 1863 1583 0 1529 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 14 124 91 253 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 193 283 58 90 308 124 64 87 91 94 126 253 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 193 341 0 90 308 124 64 87 91 0 220 253 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -AM -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 } - - �ane Group - - - - ---- EBL EBT -- EBR -- ---- WBL ---- WBT - - WBR - - - NBL --NBT-------NBR- -- - - SBL -- SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 43.0 0.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 47.8% 0.0% 13.3% 42.2% 42.2% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 37.0 6.0 32.0 32.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 56.8 48.6 51.3 44.0 44.0 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 18.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.54 0.57 0.49 0.49 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 We Ratio 0.29 0.35 0.14 0.34 0.15 0.34 0.23 0.23 0.70 0.48 Control Delay 8.1 15.0 5.6 10.9 1.4 33.6 29.2 7.3 44.4 6.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.1 15.0 5.6 10.9 1.4 33.6 29.2 7.3 44.4 6.8 LOS A B A B A C C A D A Approach Delay 12.5 7.7 22.1 24.3 Approach LOS B A C C Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 104 12 48 0 32 42 0 117 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 81 206 20 124 11 63 74 34 175 54 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 695 986 644 910 837 293 600 572 493 682 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.28 0.35 0.14 0.34 0.15 0.22 0.14 0.16 0.45 0.37 rtersection Summary --------- --- - --- -- T - -- --� ------� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 2 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.70 Intersection Signal Delay: 15.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 9 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 its and Phases: 3: Senser r 01 --l" 02 05 06 • Rd & Greenwood Rd t 08 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 9 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions_AM_Improve ments 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 f 4 I I Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations '+ Volume (vph) 0 32 186 17 0 246 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.989 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 36 207 19 0 273 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 36 226 0 0 273 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Yes No No Yes Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary ------ ------- - — --- — --- ---� Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 1017/2008 II Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r 'l� + Volume (vehlh) 0 32 186 17 0 246 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 36 207 19 0 273 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.95 vC, conflicting volume 489 216 226 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 437 216 226 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 96 100 . cM capacity (veh/h) 548 548 824 1343343 birection, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 36 226 273 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 36 19 0 cSH 824 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.04 0.13 0.16 Queue Length 95th (ft) 3 0 0 Control Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS A Approach Delay (s) 9.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS A )ntersection Summary Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 20.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions_AM_Improve ments 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 101712008 r -4. "V Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR I Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (vph) 346 76 0 471 0 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 384 84 0 523 0 38 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 384 84 0 523 0 38 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary — T-------------� Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 9 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 EBT EBR WBL WB1 Lane Configurations t If t r Volume (veh/h) 346 76 0 471 0 34 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 384 84 0 523 0 38 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.93 0.90 0.93 vC, conflicting volume 469 908 384 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 394 674 303 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free %— 94 cM capacity (vehlh) 1086 086 379 379 687 ieion, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 — — T { Volume Total 384 84 523 38 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 84 0 38 cSH 1700 1700 1700 687 Volume to Capacity 0.23 0.05 0.31 0.06 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 4 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.5 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 10.5 Approach LOS B �ntersection Summary ---�—.- -- - - -- _ - - - - --- -- - - - ---- - - -- .. _.._.------- - Average Delay 0.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -AM -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 ,Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + r* + r 1� 4 r Volume (vph) 137 219 24 50 312 33 62 0 22 23 0 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 FIt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.498 0.608 0.740 0.742 Satd. Flow (perm) 928 1863 1583 1133 1863 1583 1378 1583 0 0 1382 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 37 691 108 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 219 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 3.3 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 243 27 56 347 37 69 0 24 26 0 108 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 243 27 56 347 37 69 24 0 0 26 108 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions_AM_Improve ments 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 • �' .'`i► �t- 4`" '� # /► "*% +ice I ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SM Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 67.0 67.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 18.9% 74.4% 74.4% 55.6% 55.6% 55.6% 25.6% 25.6% 0.0% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% Maximum Green (s) 11.0 61.0 61.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.21 0.19 0.02 0.10 0.38 0.05 0.27 0.03 0.10 0.28 Control Delay 4.8 4.4 1.3 13.1 16.0 4.3 34.4 0.0 31.4 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 4.8 4.4 1.3 13.1 16.0 4.3 34.4 0.0 31.4 8.6 LOS A A A B B A C A C A Approach Delay 4.4 14.7 25.5 13.1 Approach LOS A B C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 16 25 1 16 118 0 34 0 12 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 45 m4 38 183 15 72 0 35 42 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 139 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 732 1263 1082 554 911 793 260 859 261 387 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.19 0.02 0.10 0.38 0.05 0.27 0.03 0.10 0.28 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 88 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.38 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 0 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -PM -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 # - -- --- ba Group ------- EBL _ EBT -- EBR --------------- WBL WBT- WBR------,---NBL---NBT---- - --- - NBR ---- --S-B L - - ---B-T-----S--B S- Fj Ane Lane Configurations + e t F 4 r Volume (vph) 294 471 82 185 439 125 123 202 153 185 131 353 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 90 100 100 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.978 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1822 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 0 1811 1583 Flt Permitted 0.208 0.210 0.380 0.630 Satd. Flow (perm) 387 1822 0 391 1863 1583 708 1863 1583 0 1174 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Link Speed (mph) 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 Travel Time (s) 8.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 327 523 9' Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 327 614 I Enter Blocked Intersection No No Ni Lane Alignment Left Left Righ Median Width(ft) 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Protected Phases 5 2 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 5 2 45 45 45 400 300 518 6.1 4.5 7.8 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 206 488 139 137 224 170 206 146 392 206 488 139 137 224 170 0 352 392 No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 12 12 12 0 0 0 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 94 94 6 6 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm 1 6 8 4 6 6 8 8 4 4 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -PM -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB_R, Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 43.0 0.0 12.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 19.6% 46.7% 0.0% 13.0% 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% 40.2% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 37.0 6.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 49.8 37.8 39.1 32.5 32.5 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 29.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.41 0.42 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.81 0.78 0.74 0.23 0.60 0.37 0.27 0.93 0.54 Control Delay 33.6 34.3 32.4 25.0 4.7 38.3 25.7 4.8 63.5 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.6 34.3 32.4 25.0 4.7 38.3 25.7 4.8 63.5 8.6 LOS C C C C A D C A E A Approach Delay 34.1 23.5 22.3 34.6 Approach LOS C C C C • Queue Length 50th (ft) 103 309 31 172 6 65 97 0 192 32 Queue Length 95th (ft) #231 #501 #105 #332 45 131 159 43 #359 109 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 100 150 150 Base Capacity(vph) 390 755 265 658 613 239 628 646 396 741 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.84 0.81 0.78 0.74 0.23 0.57 0.36 0.26 0.89 0.53 ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 92 Actuated Cycle Length: 92 Offset: 2 (2%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 29.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 • • E Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions_PM_Improve ments 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 plliits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd ■^01 --* o2 � o4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 • 4�- t bane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T Volume (vph) 0 83 395 36 0 398 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.989 At Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1842 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 92 439 40 0 442 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 479 0 0 442 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Yes No No Yes Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 • Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 jylovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (veh/h) 0 83 395 36 0 398 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 92 439 40 0 442 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.92 vC, conflicting volume 901 459 479 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 848 459 479 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 85 100 • cM capacity (veh/h) 305 602 1083— — — pirection, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 _ i— Volume Total 92 479 442 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 92 40 0 cSH 602 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.28 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 13 0 0 Control Delay (s) 12.1 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 12.1 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B Intersection Summary Average Delay 1.1 Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 9 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 111� 4, r01 Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (vph) 639 170 0 750 0 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 710 189 0 833 0 86 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 710 189 0 833 0 86 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) • 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 '• Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —PM —improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 -4. - Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (veh/h) 639 170 0 750 0 77 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 710 189 0 833 0 86 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.74 0.85 0.74 vC, conflicting volume 899 1543 710 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 687 982 432 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 • p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 100 671 100 234 81 461 irection, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total 710 189 833 86 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 189 0 86 cSH 1700 1700 1700 461 Volume to Capacity 0.42 0.11 0.49 0.19 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 17 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.6 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 14.6 Approach LOS B 0 intersection Summary Average Delay 0.7 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.1% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -PM -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 1I10/7/2008 -- �ane - ---- Group - EBL ----- EBT EBR --- - WBL WBT ------_- WBR--- NBL NBT NBR- SBL ----- SBT S_R, B BR Lane Configurations + r '� t r T *T r Volume (vph) 261 410 46 108 309 62 155 0 46 68 0 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.454 0.411 0.708 0.724 Satd. Flow (perm) 846 1863 1583 766 1863 1583 1319 1583 0 0 1349 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 64 415 318 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 219 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 3.3 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 290 456 51 120 343 69 172 0 51 76 0 318 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 456 51 120 343 69 172 51 0 0 76 318 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 i 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -PM -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 1017/2008 • � -� 'mot ■-- � "� � l � �*` � ,� Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NK NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 21.0 62.0 62.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 22.8% 67.4% 67.4% 44.6% 44.6% 44.6% 32.6% 32.6% 0.0% 32.6% 32.6% 32.6% Maximum Green (s) 15.0 56.0 56.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.05 0.41 0.48 0.11 0.50 0.07 0.22 0.49 Control Delay 9.5 7.9 1.5 26.4 24.5 6.1 34.9 0.2 28.7 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.5 7.9 1.5 26.4 24.5 6.1 34.9 0.2 28.7 6.2 LOS A A A C C A C A C A Approach Delay 8.0 22.5 26.9 10.5 Approach LOS A C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 51 82 0 50 149 2 85 0 35 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m65 m101 m2 103 230 28 150 0 72 63 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 139 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 666 1134 984 291 709 642 344 720 352 648 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.40 0.05 0.41 0.48 0.11 0.50 0.07 0.22 0.49 Intersection Summary i Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 92 Actuated Cycle Length: 92 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 0 0 • 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 10 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Sb-q Lane Configurations 'l� '� t r I + r 4 r Volume (vph) 227 432 34 166 411 120 70 161 174 153 154 236 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 100 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.989 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.976 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1842 0 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 0 1818 1583 Fit Permitted 0.348 0.302 0.364 0.721 Satd. Flow (perm) 648 1842 0 563 1863 1583 678 1863 1583 0 1343 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 99 193 262 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 536 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 8.1 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 252 480 38 184 457 133 78 179 193 170 171 262 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 252 518 0 184 457 133 78 179 193 0 341 262 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 6 8 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 6 8 8 8 4 4 4 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL ^ SBT SBJR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 43.0 0.0 12.0 43.0 43.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 47.8% 0.0% 13.3% 47.8% 47.8% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 37.0 6.0 37.0 37.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 46.5 39.3 45.5 38.8 38.8 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.44 0.51 0.43 0.43 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.64 0.49 0.57 0.18 0.40 0.33 0.32 0.88 0.41 Control Delay 18.9 25.0 11.0 17.2 2.9 31.3 26.1 5.1 54.4 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 18.9 25.0 11.0 17.2 2.9 31.3 26.1 5.1 54.4 5.1 LOS B C B B A C C A D A Approach Delay 23.0 13.3 18.0 33.0 Approach LOS C B B C Queue Length 50th (ft) 71 233 30 153 4 34 76 0 175 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 116 349 38 228 32 75 129 46 #315 52 Internal Link Dist (ft) 456 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 425 807 374 803 738 218 600 641 433 688 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.64 0.49 0.57 0.18 0.36 0.30 0.30 0.79 0.38 ntersecfion Summary ------------- ---- - --- ----------T----� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. iSynchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 • E Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —SAT —improvements • 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 01 --0' o2 M C7 • 06 Patton Harris Rust & Associates t 08 Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 '-- t �► Lane Configurations r T t Volume (vph) 0 69 336 32 0 354 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.988 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1840 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1840 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 77 373 36 0 393 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 409 0 0 393 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Yes No No Yes Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) 0 16 0 16 0 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions_SAT_Improve ments 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 4 `` I' &e_ ment WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T Volume (vehlh) 0 69 336 32 0 354 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 77 373 36 0 393 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.94 vC, conflicting volume 784 391 409 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 738 391 409 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 88 cM capacity (vehlh) 362 657 100 1150 irection, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 77 409 393 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 77 36 0 cSH 657 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.12 0.24 0.23 Queue Length 95th (ft) 10 0 0 Control Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 11.2 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B intersection Summary i Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 30.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 101712008 -4. .�— 'IN /01 one Group EBT EBR WBL WBT �NBL NBR 1 Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (vph) 609 150 0 697 0 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 677 167 0 774 0 72 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 677 167 0 774 0 72 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) 0 16 0 16 0 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop • �---------- ----------------- ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr 42 10/7/2008 Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR I Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (veh/h) 609 150 0 697 0 65 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 677 167 0 774 0 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.80 0.89 0.80 vC, conflicting volume 843 1451 677 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 683 1019 476 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 85 • cM capacity (veh/h) 732 233 473 irection, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total 677 167 774 72 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 167 0 72 cSH 1700 1700 1700 473 Volume to Capacity 0.40 0.10 0.46 0.15 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 13 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 14.0 Approach LOS B -terse Inte-ction S-._.ummary ___ -__------- Average Delay 0.6 Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 1017/2008 • -,.* --,,- t 1 one Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + if '� t r Vi T+ Volume (vph) 315 318 41 95 294 75 130 0 39 65 0 274 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.519 0.531 0.710 0.729 Satd. Flow (perm) 967 1863 1583 989 1863 1583 1323 1583 0 0 1358 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 46 83 546 304 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 219 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 3.3 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 350 353 46 106 327 83 144 0 43 72 0 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 353 46 106 327 83 144 43 0 0 72 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No . Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL - SBT - SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 65.0 65.0 51.0 51.0 51.0 25.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 72.2% 72.2% 56.7% 56.7% 56.7% 27.8% 27.8% 0.0% 27.8% 27.8% 27.8% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 59.0 59.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.29 0.04 0.21 0.35 0.10 0.52 0.06 0.25 0.53 Control Delay 8.5 6.1 1.5 14.1 15.0 3.2 39.0 0.1 32.4 7.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.5 6.1 1.5 14.1 15.0 3.2 39.0 0.1 32.4 7.5 LOS A A A B B A D A C A Approach Delay 6.9 12.9 30.1 12.3 Approach LOS A B C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 56 0 32 107 0 73 0 34 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m83 m83 m4 65 167 22 134 0 73 66 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 139 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 705 1221 1054 495 932 833 279 765 287 574 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.29 0.04 0.21 0.35 0.10 0.52 0.06 0.25 0.53 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.8% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 • E 0 • Pi Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2010 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM • 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 1017/loos -.--* -. f- '- 'I- t 1 bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations 'fir t r +T r *T r Volume (vph) 199 336 55 179 457 163 61 95 126 124 161 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.979 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.981 0.979 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1824 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1827 1583 0 1824 1583 Fit Permitted 0.291 0.348 0.612 0.757 Satd. Flow (perm) 542 1824 0 648 1863 1583 0 1140 1583 0 1410 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 121 140 217 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 628 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 9.5 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 221 373 61 199 508 181 68 106 140 138 179 318 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 434 0 199 508 181 0 174 140 0 317 318 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 0 Right Left Left 0 Right Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 7 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 42.0 0.0 15.0 43.0 43.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 14.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 46.7% 0.0% 16.7% 47.8% 47.8% 36.7% 36.7% 36.7% 36.7% 36.7% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 36.0 9.0 37.0 37.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 8.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None Act Effct Green (s) 44.3 36.3 45.7 37.0 37.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 41.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.49 0.40 0.51 0.41 0.41 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.46 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.58 0.46 0.66 0.25 0.51 0.24 0.75 0.38 Control Delay 17.5 24.4 8.4 22.6 7.0 32.3 5.5 41.3 6.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.5 24.4 8.4 22.6 7.0 32.3 5.5 41.3 6.6 LOS B C A C A C A D A Approach Delay 22.1 16.3 20.4 24.0 Approach LOS C B C C • Queue Length 50th (ft) 58 184 31 256 40 81 0 162 32 Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 282 57 381 71 147 41 #288 86 Internal Link Dist (ft) 548 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 376 742 443 767 723 342 573 423 839 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.59 0.58 0.45 0.66 0.25 0.51 0.24 0.75 0.38 is ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 78 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.75 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10171200s • Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd o2 1 03 1­00 o4 i 06 10 07 147- o8 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 • f t / ane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations + Volume (vph) 0 32 250 17 0 395 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.991 Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1846 0 0 1863 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1846 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 36 278 19 0 439 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 36 297 0 0 439 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 • Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary �- Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • 0 • E Ervin - Senseny Road Property 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd f- 4- t 1 2016 Build -out Conditions AM 10/7/2008 Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T Volume (veh/h) 0 32 250 17 0 395 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 36 278 19 0 439 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) - Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 vC, conflicting volume 726 287 297 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 603 287 297 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 95 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 399 752 1265 irection, Lane # _� WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 36 297 439 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 36 19 0 cSH 752 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.17 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 Control Delay (s) 10.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 10.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B jntersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 1017/2008 bane Group EBT EBR WBL _WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations t If t r Volume (vph) 510 76 0 799 0 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 At Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 At Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 567 84 0 888 0 38 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 567 84 0 888 0 38 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 • Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop 0 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 • —► f 1* Movement -----�-- EBT EBR - - WBL WBT NBL NBR------^-^----------- —� Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (veh/h) 510 76 0 799 0 34 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 567 84 0 888 0 38 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.84 0.80 0.84 vC, conflicting volume 651 1454 567 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 489 995 388 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 10 cMcapacity (vehlh) • 902 218 218 554 554 birection, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 — — Volume Total 567 84 888 38 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 84 0 38 cSH 1700 1700 1700 554 Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.05 0.52 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 5 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.0 Approach LOS B intersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 • -A t II t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations + r I T+ Volume (vph) 137 383 24 50 640 33 62 0 22 23 0 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Flt Permitted 0.286 0.503 0.740 0.742 Satd. Flow (perm) 533 1863 1583 937 1863 1583 1378 1583 0 0 1382 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 27 523 108 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 190 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 2.9 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 426 27 56 711 37 69 0 24 26 0 108 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 426 27 56 711 37 69 24 0 0 26 108 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 )_ane' Group _ EBL EBT EBR WBL ^ WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR ^ SBL SBT SBFj Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 73.0 73.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 17.0 17.0 0.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 81.1% 81.1% 67.8% 67.8% 67.8% 18.9% 18.9% 0.0% 18.9% 18.9% 18.9% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 67.0 67.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 67.0 67.0 67.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.31 0.02 0.10 0.62 0.04 0.41 0.04 0.15 0.38 Control Delay 5.8 4.0 1.5 7.8 14.1 3.6 44.6 0.1 37.9 11.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 5.8 4.0 1.5 7.8 14.1 3.6 44.6 0.1 37.9 11.7 LOS A A A A B A D A D B Approach Delay 4.4 13.2 33.1 16.8 Approach LOS A B C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 15 43 0 12 232 2 37 0 13 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m35 m96 m4 28 343 13 79 0 38 46 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 110 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 479 1387 1185 573 1139 978 168 653 169 288 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.32 0.31 0.02 0.10 0.62 0.04 0.41 0.04 0.15 0.38 • intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 0 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _AM 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/712008 Splits and Phases: 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM • 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 1017/2008 * �ane Group EBL� EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ Vi + r Volume (vph) 361 720 87 287 628 186 128 259 290 253 166 403 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.984 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.984 0.971 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1833 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1833 1583 0 1809 1583 Fit Permitted 0.129 0.148 0.459 0.411 Satd. Flow (perm) 240 1833 0 276 1863 1583 0 855 1583 0 766 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 7 80 258 41 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 628 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 9.5 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 401 800 97 319 698 207 142 288 322 281 184 448 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 401 897 0 319 698 207 0 430 322 0 465 448 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) • 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+ov Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 7 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 7 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 • II -.4 -* --v 4,- ■-- \ t l �*' t -4/ rL5ne Group-T--_.,_.____..__ - EBL - EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR - NBL NBT -NBR TSBL SBT --SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 17.0 37.0 0.0 13.0 33.0 33.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 44.0 17.0 Total Split (%) 18.1 % 39.4% 0.0% 13.8% 35.1 % 35.1 % 46.8% 46.8% 46.8% 46.8% 46.8% 18.1 % Maximum Green (s) 11.0 31.0 7.0 27.0 27.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 11.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max None Act Effct Green (s) 42.0 31.0 34.0 27.0 27.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 55.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.45 0.33 0.36 0.29 0.29 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.59 v/c Ratio 1.40 1.47 1.51 1.30 0.40 1.24 0.41 1.50 0.48 Control Delay 224.3 249.1 270.3 179.3 21.8 159.6 6.2 267.1 12.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 51.3 0.0 Total Delay 224.3 249.1 270.3 179.3 21.8 159.6 6.3 318.4 12.1 LOS F F F F C F A F B Approach Delay 241.4 176.4 93.9 168.1 Approach LOS F F F F Queue Length 50th (ft) -274 -746 -219 -550 70 -322 23 -388 128 Queue Length 95th (ft) #458 #982 m#367 #756 m111 #506 81 #578 202 Internal Link Dist (ft) 548 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 286 609 211 535 512 346 794 310 943 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 46 22 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.40 1.47 1.51 1.30 0.40 1.24 0.43 1.61 0.48 ntersection Summary ---� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 94 Actuated Cycle Length: 94 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.51 Intersection Signal Delay: 179.9 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 122.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min)15 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10171200s Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd m2 1 m3 1-10' m4 0 • • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 'r 4-- t r 10� 1 2016 Build -out Conditions PM 10/7/2008 Lane Configurations r T Volume (vph) 0 83 594 36 0 541 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.992 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 At Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 92 660 40 0 601 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 700 0 0 601 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary T Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 'e_-4-- t ovement WB_L WBR NBT NBR SBL Lane Configurations r* T+ Volume (veh/h) 0 83 594 36 0 541 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 92 660 40 0 601 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.84 vC, conflicting volume 1281 680 700 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1241 680 700 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 163 80 451 100 897 ire ion, Lane # — WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 — Volume Total 92 700 601 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 92 40 0 cSH 451 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.41 0.35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 0 Control Delay (s) 15.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C Approach Delay (s) 15.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C jntersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 1017/2008 M-0 f", 4\ /01 ).ane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR T Lane Configurations t r t r Volume (vph) 1094 170 0 1101 0 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 At Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1216 189 0 1223 0 86 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1216 189 0 1223 0 86 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop • ntersection Summary --------------- ---- — ---- ---- -- Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 -- Movement EBT EBR -- WBL --_NB------- WBT L NBR --- --- ---._----------- Lane Configurations t r t Volume (veh/h) 1094 170 0 1101 0 77 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1216 189 0 1223 0 86 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.68 0.76 0.68 vC, conflicting volume 1404 2439 1216 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1359 1774 1079 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 1 52 cM capacity (vehlh) 342 342 69 69 179 — Direction, Lane # EB 1 EB 2� WB 1 NB 1 — — -- ^— — — Volume Total 1216 189 1223 86 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 189 0 86 cSH 1700 1700 1700 179 Volume to Capacity 0.72 0.11 0.72 0.48 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 57 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 42.2 Lane LOS E Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 42.2 Approach LOS E intersection Summary Average Delay 1.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 bane Group EBL EBT� EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT MR, Lane Configurations + r '� + r T *T r Volume (vph) 261 864 46 108 661 62 155 0 46 68 0 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.219 0.122 0.708 0.724 Satd. Flow (perm) 408 1863 1583 227 1863 1583 1319 1583 0 0 1349 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 30 38 161 276 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 190 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 2.9 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 290 960 51 120 734 69 172 0 51 76 0 318 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 960 51 120 734 69 172 51 0 0 76 318 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _PM 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 * Vne rou Gp TBL E EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL _ NBT NBR SBL- SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 68.0 68.0 56.0 56.0 56.0 26.0 26.0 0.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Total Split (%) 12.8% 72.3% 72.3% 59.6% 59.6% 59.6% 27.7% 27.7% 0.0% 27.7% 27.7% 27.7% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 62.0 62.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 62.0 62.0 62.0 50.0 50.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.81 0.78 0.05 0.99 0.74 0.08 0.61 0.11 0.26 0.57 Control Delay 26.4 16.1 2.8 108.0 22.7 6.1 44.1 0.5 33.9 11.0 Queue Delay 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.4 17.3 2.8 108.0 22.7 6.1 44.1 0.5 33.9 11.0 LOS C B A F C A D A C B Approach Delay 18.7 32.6 34.1 15.4 Approach LOS B C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 88 499 6 67 320 8 93 0 38 20 Queue Length 95th (ft) m69 m337 m7 #186 469 28 164 0 79 99 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 110 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 356 1229 1054 121 991 860 281 464 287 554 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 104 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.81 0.85 0.05 0.99 0.74 0.08 0.61 0.11 0.26 0.57 intersection Summary � --- ---- ---T------------� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 94 Actuated Cycle Length: 94 Offset: 88 (94%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 • 0 • • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_PM 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 101712008 Splits and Phases: 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway Patton Harris Rust & Associates ME ;` M■ M■ Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 ri Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 #, Lane Group _ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations T+ Vi + r +T r 4 r Volume (vph) 280 690 36 295 644 184 72 207 319 221 195 284 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 0 150 0 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.987 0.974 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1850 0 1770 1863 1583 0 1839 1583 0 1814 1583 Fit Permitted 0.125 0.125 0.503 0.548 Satd, Flow (perm) 233 1850 0 233 1863 1583 0 937 1583 0 1021 1583 Rioht Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Link Speed (mph) 45 Link Distance (ft) 628 Travel Time (s) 9.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 311 767 41 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 311 807 1 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Ni Lane Alignment Left Left Righ Median Width(ft) 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 7 4 45 45 45 400 300 518 6.1 4.5 7.8 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 328 716 204 80 230 354 246 217 316 328 716 204 0 310 354 0 463 316 No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 12 0 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 94 94 6 6 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm 3 8 2 6 8 8 2 2 6 6 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 ---------------- ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL -- WBT WBR --- - NBL ---------------- NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 38.0 0.0 14.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 42.2% 0.0% 15.6% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% 42.2% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 32.0 8.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 40.0 32.0 40.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.44 0.36 0.44 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 1.30 1.22 1.37 1.08 0.33 0.93 0.48 1.28 0.43 Control Delay 183.2 142.0 204.5 86.0 16.4 65.1 8.4 172.2 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 183.2 142.0 204.5 86.0 16.4 65.1 8.4 172.2 6.0 LOS F F F F B E A F A Approach Delay 153.5 105.7 34.9 104.8 Approach LOS F F C F Queue Length 50th (ft) -178 -573 -196 -454 66 167 33 -336 14 Queue Length 95th (ft) #342 #800 m#311 m#648 m106 #332 104 #522 71 Internal Link Dist (ft) 548 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 240 660 240 662 620 333 735 363 742 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.30 1.22 1.37 1.08 0.33 0.93 0.48 1.28 0.43 0 ntersecbon Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 107.2 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.2% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 0 0 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/200s Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd m2 %� m3 M 06 'r m7 08 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 E • 11 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd f" 4- 2016 Build -out Conditions SAT 10/7/2008 Lane GrouD WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT I Lane Configurations r 1� + Volume (vph) 0 69 529 32 0 525 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.992 Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 77 588 36 0 583 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 624 0 0 583 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free jntersection Summary -- --------^ — — - -- Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 C7 E • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 'r fi go. Lane Configurations if T t Volume (veh/h) 0 69 529 32 0 525 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 77 588 36 0 583 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.86 vC, conflicting volume 1189 606 623 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1136 606 623 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 85 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 191 497 958 irection, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 77 623 583 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 77 36 0 cSH 497 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.37 0.34 Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 0 0 Control Delay (s) 13.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 13.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B intersection Summary —A----- - - --- --^_-- Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 0 M Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/712008 EBT EBR Lane Configurations t r t r Volume (vph) 1081 150 0 1123 0 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 100 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1201 167 0 1248 0 72 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1201 167 0 1248 0 72 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 • Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 0 0 0 • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 --I,. '`t *-- 10\ I'' Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (veh/h) 1081 150 0 1123 0 65 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1201 167 0 1248 0 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.65 0.73 0.65 vC, conflicting volume 1368 2449 1201 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1296 1720 1040 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 60 cM capacity (veh/h) 347 71 182 birection, Lane # -- — — EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total 1201 167 1248 72 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 167 0 72 cSH 1700 1700 1700 182 Volume to Capacity 0.71 0.10 0.73 0.40 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 44 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.3 Lane LOS E Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 37.3 Approach LOS E jntersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations t r t r fj '* a' r Volume (vph) 315 790 41 95 720 75 130 0 39 65 0 274 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.169 0.182 0.710 0.729 Satd. Flow (perm) 315 1863 1583 339 1863 1583 1323 1583 0 0 1358 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 33 43 200 283 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 190 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 2.9 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 350 878 46 106 800 83 144 0 43 72 0 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 878 46 106 800 83 144 43 0 0 72 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 --v 'r 4--- 4- 4\ t �► 1 ./ Cane Group T EBL EBT EBR - WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL TSBT SBI Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 67.0 67.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 23.0 23.0 0.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 15.6% 74.4% 74.4% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 25.6% 25.6% 0.0% 25.6% 25.6% 25.6% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 61.0 61.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 61.0 61.0 61.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.68 0.68 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 v/c Ratio 1.02 0.70 0.04 0.60 0.82 0.10 0.58 0.09 0.28 0.57 Control Delay 66.7 19.0 4.5 32.5 26.9 6.3 43.5 0.4 34.7 10.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 66.7 19.0 4.5 32.5 26.9 6.3 43.5 0.4 34.7 10.1 LOS E B A C C A D A C B Approach Delay 31.5 25.8 33.6 14.9 Approach LOS C C C B • Queue Length 50th (ft) -129 451 7 40 360 11 75 0 35 1c Queue Length 95th (ft) m#126 m412 m8 #124 #552 33 138 0 75 83 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 110 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 343 1263 1084 177 973 847 250 461 257 52E Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C Reduced v/c Ratio 1.02 0.70 0.04 0.60 0.82 0.10 0.58 0.09 0.28 0.57 intersection Summary ------ -_ �� T- --- -- - ---- --- Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.02 Intersection Signal Delay: 27.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. iSynchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions _SAT 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 101712008 Splits and Phases: 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway n n =a MIN �■ • • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 0 • 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -AM -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT_ SBq Lane Configurations +T tt r t r + r Volume (vph) 199 336 55 179 457 163 61 95 126 124 161 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 100 150 250 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.979 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3465 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.350 0.498 0.644 0.536 Satd. Flow (perm) 652 3465 0 928 3539 1583 1200 1863 1583 998 1863 1583 Riaht Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Link Speed (mph) 45 Link Distance (ft) 628 Travel Time (s) 9.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.91 Adj. Flow (vph) 221 373 6 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 221 434 Enter Blocked Intersection No No Ni Lane Alignment Left Left Righ Median Width(ft) 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.0 Turning Speed (mph) 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Protected Phases 7 4 Permitted Phases 4 Detector Phase 7 4 45 45 45 400 300 518 6.1 4.5 7.8 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 199 508 181 68 106 140 138 179 318 199 508 181 68 106 140 138 179 318 No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 12 12 12 0 0 0 16 16 16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 94 94 6 6 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 pm+pt pm+ov Perm Perm pm+pt Perm 3 8 1 2 1 6 8 8 2 2 6 6 3 8 1 2 2 2 1 6 6 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -AM -improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 i _# -,. 'r4--- 4__ t r 1 4, Vane Group EBL EBT EBR �WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBfZ Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 36.0 0.0 15.0 32.0 12.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 12.0 39.0 39.0 Total Split (%) 21.1 % 40.0% 0.0% 16.7% 35.6% 13.3% 30.0% 30.0% 30.0% 13.3% 43.3% 43.3% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 30.0 9.0 26.0 6.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 6.0 33.0 33.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max None C-Max C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 41.5 30.3 36.5 27.7 39.7 21.0 21.0 21.0 33.0 33.0 33.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.34 0.41 0.31 0.44 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.37 0.37 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.37 0.43 0.47 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.33 0.26 0.41 Control Delay 17.3 22.6 12.0 24.3 7.8 30.9 29.9 7.0 22.2 21.3 4.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 17.3 22.6 12.0 24.3 7.8 30.9 29.9 7.0 22.2 21.3 4.1 LOS B C B C A C C A C C A Approach Delay 20.8 18.2 19.9 12.9 Approach LOS C B B B Queue Length 50th (ft) • 69 92 56 138 30 32 49 0 53 70 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 113 133 m86 197 m69 69 94 45 95 120 53 Internal Link Dist (ft) 548 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 100 150 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 475 1180 463 1091 800 280 435 477 417 683 782 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.47 0.37 0.43 0.47 0.23 0.24 0.24 0.29 0.33 0.26 0.41 ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.7 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 57.1% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 11 0 E 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_AM_Improve ments 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd ml o2 • 03 ' 4 M 06 =o7 08 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_AM_Im prove ments 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 f 4-- t r 1 ane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T Volume (vph) 0 32 250 17 0 395 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.991 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1846 0 0 1863 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1846 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 36 278 19 0 439 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 36 297 0 0 439 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 • Link Offset(ft) 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 0 16 0 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free rntersection Summary T ----- -- _-- ------------------� Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 'e- t r �► 1 f Movement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r T+ Volume (veh/h) 0 32 250 17 0 395 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 36 278 19 0 439 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 vC, conflicting volume 726 287 297 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 591 287 297 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 • p0 queue free % 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 400 95 752 100 1265 Viva n, Lane # ------ WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 T----------------- Volume Total 36 297 439 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 36 19 0 cSH 752 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.05 0.17 0.26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 4 0 0 Control Delay (s) 10.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 10.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B j-ntersection Summary Average Delay 0.5 Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 . Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 Vane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r t Volume (vph) 510 76 0 799 0 34 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 567 84 0 888 0 38 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 567 84 0 888 0 38 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) 1.00 1.00 9 1.00 15 1.00 1.00 15 1.00 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop --- -- -----ry----------- -- ------ - --- —------- — —..__ . _—. — �ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —AM —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 FRT FRR WRI WRT Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh/h) 510 76 0 799 0 34 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 567 84 0 888 0 38 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.85 0.78 0.85 vC, conflicting volume 651 1454 567 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 506 1023 407 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 • p0 queue free % cM capacity (veh/h) 100 904 100 205 93 550 I irection, Lane # EB T EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total 567 84 888 38 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 84 0 38 cSH 1700 1700 1700 550 Volume to Capacity 0.33 0.05 0.52 0.07 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 6 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 12.0 Approach LOS B Jntersection Summary Average Delay 0.3 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -AM -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 j one Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBE� Lane Configurations + '� + r Vi T 4 r Volume (vph) 137 383 24 50 640 33 62 0 22 23 0 97 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.273 0.497 0.740 0.742 Satd. Flow (perm) 509 1863 1583 926 1863 1583 1378 1583 0 0 1382 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 25 511 108 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 190 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 2.9 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 152 426 27 56 711 37 69 0 24 26 0 108 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 152 426 27 56 711 37 69 24 0 0 26 108 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 9 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -AM -Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 * )_ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBF� Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 71.0 71.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 19.0 0.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 Total Split(%) 13.3% 78.9% 78.9% 65.6% 65.6% 65.6% 21.1% 21.1% 0.0% 21.1% 21.1% 21.1% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 65.0 65.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 65.0 65.0 65.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.59 0.59 0.59 0.14 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.32 0.02 0.10 0.65 0.04 0.35 0.04 0.13 0.34 Control Delay 6.6 4.5 1.1 8.7 15.8 4.2 40.2 0.1 35.5 10.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.6 4.5 1.1 8.7 15.8 4.2 40.2 0.1 35.5 10.4 LOS A A A A B A D A D B Approach Delay 4.9 14.8 29.9 15.3 Approach LOS A B C B Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 49 0 13 248 3 36 0 13 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 31 76 4 30 366 15 77 0 37 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 110 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity(vph) 452 1346 1151 545 1097 942 199 666 200 321 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.34 0.32 0.02 0.10 0.65 0.04 0.35 0.04 0.13 0.34 ntersection Summary _ Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.0 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.4% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 0 • • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_AM_Improve ments 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue 10/7/2008 Splits and Phases: 8: Senseny Rd & Grocery Avenue —�" o2 o4 06 '� 05 T 0 8 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -PM -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 one Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations tT+ tt r Vii t r '� t Volume (vph) 361 720 87 287 628 186 128 259 290 253 166 403 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 100 150 250 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.984 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3483 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 At Permitted 0.187 0.177 0.641 0.265 Satd. Flow (perm) 348 3483 0 330 3539 1583 1194 1863 1583 494 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 13 166 322 374 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 628 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 9.5 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 401 800 97 319 698 207 142 288 322 281 184 448 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 401 897 0 319 698 207 142 288 322 281 184 448 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+ov Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 1 2 2 2 1 6 6 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_PM_Improve ments 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 42.0 0.0 20.0 36.0 15.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 15.0 44.0 44.0 Total Split (%) 24.5% 39.6% 0.0% 18.9% 34.0% 14.2% 27.4% 27.4% 27.4% 14.2% 41.5% 41.5% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 36.0 14.0 30.0 9.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 9.0 38.0 38.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max None C-Max C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 55.3 36.0 44.7 30.7 45.7 23.0 23.0 23.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.52 0.34 0.42 0.29 0.43 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.36 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.75 0.97 0.68 0.27 0.55 0.71 0.54 0.99 0.28 0.56 Control Delay 46.9 35.4 65.8 28.2 2.6 46.0 49.5 7.7 81.0 25.6 7.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 46.9 35.4 65.8 28.2 2.6 46.0 49.5 7.7 81.0 25.6 7.9 LOS D D E C A D D A F C A Approach Delay 39.0 33.7 30.9 34.0 Approach LOS D C C C • Queue Length 50th (ft) 176 277 155 165 6 86 182 0 144 88 33 Queue Length 95th (ft) #352 354 m#309 265 m27 152 #279 73 #319 144 120 Internal Link Dist (ft) 548 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 100 150 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 452 1191 329 1025 777 259 404 596 285 668 807 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.89 0.75 0.97 0.68 0.27 0.55 0.71 0.54 0.99 0.28 0.56 .Intersection Summary _ T Area Type: Other Cycle Length:106 Actuated Cycle Length: 106 Offset: 64 (60%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 0 • • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_PM_Improve ments 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Splits and Phases: 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 01 t o2 m3 M 06 07 08 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Lane Configurations r 1� t Volume (vph) 0 83 594 36 0 541 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.992 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 92 660 40 0 601 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 92 700 0 0 601 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free intersection Summary ---- ---- ------ --^—------� Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 i- ovement _ WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations r il� t Volume (veh/h) 0 83 594 36 0 541 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 92 660 40 0 601 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.78 vC, conflicting volume 1281 680 700 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1218 680 700 tC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 80 100 cM capacity (veh/h) 155 451 897 pirection, Lane # WB 1 NB-1 SB 1 T Volume Total 92 700 601 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 92 40 0 cSH 451 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.20 0.41 0.35 Queue Length 95th (ft) 19 0 0 Control Delay (s) 15.0 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS C Approach Delay (s) 15.0 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS C intersection Summary Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 is Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR T � — -- Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 1094 170 0 1101 0 77 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Said. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1216 189 0 1223 0 86 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1216 189 0 1223 0 86 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 • Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_PM_Improve ments 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 vlovement _EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR T Lane Configurations + r + r Volume (veh/h) 1094 170 0 1101 0 77 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1216 189 0 1223 0 86 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.63 0.78 0.63 vC, conflicting volume 1404 2439 1216 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1348 1632 1047 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 p0 queue free % 100 100 51 cM capacity (veh/h) 321 86 174 --n, Lane---.#_ _---- irectio _ _---E-B-1-EB EB 2 - WB 1 -- NB 1 ---- --- -- _------------ —---- - -— Volume Total 1216 189 1223 86 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 189 0 86 cSH 1700 1700 1700 174 Volume to Capacity 0.72 0.11 0.72 0.49 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 60 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 Lane LOS E Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 44.2 Approach LOS E intersection Summary Average Delay 1.4 Intersection Capacity Utilization 69.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_PM_Improve ments 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB Lane Configurations t r '� t r 1� Volume (vph) 261 864 46 108 661 62 155 0 46 68 0 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 Fit Permitted 0.202 0.132 0.708 0.724 Satd. Flow (perm) 376 1863 1583 246 1863 1583 1319 1583 0 0 1349 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 29 33 175 318 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 190 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 2.9 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 290 960 51 120 734 69 172 0 51 76 0 318 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 290 960 51 120 734 69 172 51 0 0 76 318 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_PM_Improve ments 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 .-* --► --i *-- 4-- 4\ T r' \I,. 1 f- ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBFj Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 79.0 79.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 27.0 27.0 0.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 17.0% 74.5% 74.5% 57.5% 57.5% 57.5% 25.5% 25.5% 0.0% 25.5% 25.5% 25.5% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 73.0 73.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 73.0 73.0 73.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.75 0.05 0.94 0.76 0.08 0.66 0.11 0.28 0.56 Control Delay 19.7 8.8 1.7 93.6 26.6 7.9 52.6 0.5 39.5 8.3 Queue Delay 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 19.7 10.0 1.7 93.6 26.6 7.9 52.6 0.5 39.5 8.3 LOS B B A F C A D A D A Approach Delay 11.9 33.9 40.7 14.4 Approach LOS B C D B . Queue Length 50th (ft) 46 131 0 73 379 12 109 0 44 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) m94 m192 m5 #197 539 34 #195 0 88 74 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 110 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 417 1283 1099 128 967 837 261 454 267 569 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 143 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.70 0.84 0.05 0.94 0.76 0.08 0.66 0.11 0.28 0.56 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 106 Actuated Cycle Length: 106 Offset:104 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.6 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —PM —Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 101712008 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 10 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 Lane Group EBL _ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT TSB Lane Configurations +I+ '� tt r I t r '� t r Volume (vph) 280 690 36 295 644 184 72 207 319 221 195 284 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 90 100 100 150 250 150 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.993 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3514 0 1770 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.218 0.185 0.622 0.324 Satd. Flow (perm) 406 3514 0 345 3539 1583 1159 1863 1583 604 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 5 165 354 316 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 628 400 300 518 Travel Time (s) 9.5 6.1 4.5 7.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 311 767 40 328 716 204 80 230 354 246 217 316 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 311 807 0 328 716 204 80 230 354 246 217 316 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right • Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt pm+pt pm+ov Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 1 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 Detector Phase 7 4 3 8 1 2 2 2 1 6 6 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 1 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions -SAT -Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 - -- _ _ - ane Group - -- --- EBL -_--- EBT EBR -------- WBL WBT ---- WBR NBL ---- ---- - -.---- NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 38.0 0.0 23.0 34.0 17.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 17.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split (%) 26.0% 36.5% 0.0% 22.1 % 32.7% 16.3% 25.0% 25.0% 25.0% 16.3% 41.3% 41.3% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 32.0 17.0 28.0 11.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 11.0 37.0 37.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None Max None C-Max C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 50.0 33.0 48.0 32.0 49.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.32 0.46 0.31 0.47 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.36 0.36 0.36 v/c Ratio 0.74 0.72 0.87 0.66 0.24 0.36 0.64 0.60 0.73 0.33 0.41 Control Delay 27.3 35.9 48.3 26.2 2.6 41.8 48.0 8.7 39.7 26.2 4.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 27.3 35.9 48.3 26.2 2.6 41.8 48.0 8.7 39.7 26.2 4.5 LOS C D D C A D D A D C A Approach Delay 33.5 28.1 26.3 21.6 Approach LOS C C C C . Queue Length 50th (ft) 113 251 155 160 4 47 142 0- 121 104 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 188 323 m#256 m274 m19 93 225 79 #207 166 57 Internal Link Dist (ft) 548 320 220 438 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 90 100 100 150 250 150 Base Capacity (vph) 484 1118 395 1090 833 223 358 590 338 663 767 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.64 0.72 0.83 0.66 0.24 0.36 0.64 0.60 0.73 0.33 0.41 intersection Summary_____ - -T ---------------- -^� Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 104 Actuated Cycle Length: 104 Offset: 72 (69%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.87 Intersection Signal Delay: 28.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.7% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 2 0 • • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 3: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 10/712008 Splits and Phases: 3:: Senseny Rd & Greenwood Rd 01 I o2 %� o3 M MWAM o6 07 08 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 3 n L-..A • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 T ane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 0 69 529 32 0 525 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 110 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.992 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 1848 0 0 1863 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 242 209 300 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.2 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 77 588 36 0 583 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 77 624 0 0 583 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 • Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Sign Control Stop Free Free intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 4 • 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_SAT_Im prove ments 5: Site -Dr #1 & Greenwood Rd 10/7/2008 'e- 4- t r 1 ovement WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT Lane Configurations If '* + Volume (veh/h) 0 69 529 32 0 525 Sign Control Stop Free Free Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 0 77 588 36 0 583 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 300 pX, platoon unblocked 0.76 vC, conflicting volume 1189 606 623 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1091 606 623 IC, single (s) 6.4 6.2 4.1 IC, 2 stage (s) IF (s) 3.5 3.3 2.2 p0 queue free % 100 85 100 • cM capacity (veh/h) 181 497 958 Direction, Lane # WB 1 NB 1 SB 1 Volume Total 77 623 583 Volume Left 0 0 0 Volume Right 77 36 0 cSH 497 1700 1700 Volume to Capacity 0.15 0.37 0.34 Queue Length 95th (ft) 14 0 0 Control Delay (s) 13.6 0.0 0.0 Lane LOS B Approach Delay (s) 13.6 0.0 0.0 Approach LOS B ntersection Summary Average Delay 0.8 Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 5 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_SAT_Improve ments 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/712008 ----------------------------- - --- -- - --- -- - --- ------------- � ane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR Lane Configurations + r t r Volume (vph) 1081 150 0 1123 0 65 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.865 Fit Protected Said. Flow (prot) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 1863 1583 0 1863 0 1611 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 405 400 141 Travel Time (s) 6.1 6.1 2.1 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 1201 167 0 1248 0 72 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1201 167 0 1248 0 72 Enter Blocked Intersection Yes No No Yes No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) • 9 15 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 0 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 6 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 7: Senseny Rd & Site -Dr #2 10/7/2008 —• Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR i Lane Configurations + If + r Volume (veh/h) 1081 150 0 1123 0 65 Sign Control Free Free Stop Grade 0% 0% 0% Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1201 167 0 1248 0 72 Pedestrians Lane Width (ft) Walking Speed (ft/s) Percent Blockage Right turn flare (veh) Median type None None Median storage veh) Upstream signal (ft) 405 400 pX, platoon unblocked 0.67 0.72 0.67 vC, conflicting volume 1368 2449 1201 vC1, stage 1 conf vol vC2, stage 2 conf vol vCu, unblocked vol 1302 1778 1052 tC, single (s) 4.1 6.4 6.2 tC, 2 stage (s) tF (s) 2.2 3.5 3.3 queue free % 100 100 61 •p0 cM capacity (veh/h) 355 65 184 irection, Lane # EB 1 EB 2 WB 1 NB 1 Volume Total 1201 167 1248 72 Volume Left 0 0 0 0 Volume Right 0 167 0 72 cSH 1700 1700 1700 184 Volume to Capacity 0.71 0.10 0.73 0.39 Queue Length 95th (ft) 0 0 0 43 Control Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.8 Lane LOS E Approach Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 36.8 Approach LOS E intersection Summary --------------- --- --- ---- -- ----- --- -- Average Delay 1.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 67.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 7 0 0 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_SAT_Improve ments 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 �ane Group EBLTEBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SB� Lane Configurations + r t r I T+ Volume (vph) 315 790 41 95 720 75 130 0 39 65 0 274 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 1863 1583 1770 1863 1583 1770 1583 0 0 1770 1583 At Permitted 0.157 0.173 0.710 0.729 Satd. Flow (perm) 292 1863 1583 322 1863 1583 1323 1583 0 0 1358 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 37 198 291 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 400 363 190 295 Travel Time (s) 6.1 5.5 2.9 4.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 350 878 46 106 800 83 144 0 43 72 0 304 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 350 878 46 106 800 83 144 43 0 0 72 304 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Left Left 12 Right Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 4 Permitted Phases 2 2 6 6 8 4 4 Detector Phase 5 2 2 6 6 6 8 8 4 4 4 Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 8 Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions_SAT_Improve ments 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 10/7/2008 Vane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBql Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 16.0 76.0 76.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 28.0 28.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 15.4% 73.1% 73.1% 57.7% 57.7% 57.7% 26.9% 26.9% 0.0% 26.9% 26.9% 26.9% Maximum Green (s) 10.0 70.0 70.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 70.0 70.0 70.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 1.03 0.70 0.04 0.63 0.83 0.10 0.51 0.09 0.25 0.54 Control Delay 75.6 10.9 2.9 38.7 30.1 8.0 43.8 0.4 36.9 8.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 75.6 11.4 2.9 38.7 30.1 8.0 43.8 0.4 36.9 8.9 LOS E B A D C A D A D A Approach Delay 28.8 29.2 33.8 14.3 Approach LOS C C C B Queue Length 50th (ft) • -130 162 1 48 429 15 85 0 40 7 Queue Length 95th (ft) #315 243 m8 #141 615 39 150 0 82 81 Internal Link Dist (ft) 320 283 110 215 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 100 100 100 Base Capacity (vph) 339 1254 1075 167 967 840 280 491 287 564 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 1.03 0.77 0.04 0.63 0.83 0.10 0.51 0.09 0.25 0.54 )ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 104 Actuated Cycle Length: 104 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 75 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Signal Delay: 27.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.2% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 - Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. • Synchro 7 - Report Patton Harris Rust & Associates Page 9 9 • • Ervin - Senseny Road Property 2016 Build -out Conditions —SAT —Improvements 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway 1017/2008 Splits and Phases: 8: Senseny Rd & Orrick Property Site -Driveway Patton Harris Rust & Associates a Synchro 7 - Report Page 10 0 0 0 Scoping Document �J • • • Administrative Guidelines January 28, 2008 91 Virginia Department PRE -SCOPE OF WORK MEETING FORM �\VDDT of Transportation Information on the Project Traffic Impact Analysis Base Assumptions The applicant is responsible for having this form completed and returned to VDOT and the locality no less than three (3) business days prior to the meeting. If a completed form is not received by this deadline, the scope of work meeting may be postponed. Contact Information Consultant Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates c/o Michael Glickman Tele: (301) 223-4010 E-mail: Michael.Glickman@phra.com Developer/Owner Name: Tele: Ervine Development E-mail: Project Information Project Name: Senseny Road Property Project Location: Project is located along the east side of Route 656 (Greenwood Road), (Attach regional and site south of Route 657 (Senseny Road), in Frederick County, VA. A location specific location map) map is attached. Project Description: Including type of application (rezoning, subdivision, site Scoving Session plan), acreage, business square Rezoning ft, number of dwelling units, access location, etc. Attach additional sheet if necessary) Locality/County: Frederick County Proposed Use: (Check all that apply; attach Residential ❑ Commercial Z Mixed Use ❑ Other ❑ additional pages as necessary) Residential # of Units: Mixed Use: # Res. Units: Commercial Use Sq Ft: ITE LU Code(s): 249900 SF Commercial Use Sq Ft: ITE LU Code(s): ITE LU Code(s): 853 — 4,000 SF Convenience Mart Other: w/Gas Station ITE LU Code(s): 881 — 12,900 SF Pharmacy 912 — 8,000 SF Drive-in Bank Page 1 of 6 0 0 Administrative Guidelines Traffic Impact Analysis Assumptions Study Period Existing Year: 2008 Study Area Boundaries North: Senseny Road (Attach map) East: Site -Driveway #3 External Factors That Could Affect Project (Planned road improvements, other nearby developments) Consistency With Comprehensive Plan Available Traffic Data (Historical, forecasts) Trip Distribution (Attach sketch) January 28, 2008 Build -out Year: 2010 Design Year: 2016 South: Site -Driveway #1 West: Greenwood Road Road Name: Greenwood Road N 30% 1 S 10% Road Name: Senseny Road N % IS % Road Name: E % IW % E 30% 1 W 30% N % IS % IE % IW % Road Name: N % S % E % W % Annual Vehicle Trip Peak Period for � M S pA Growth Rate: ° 1 /0 Study Circle all that apply) (7-9) (4-6) (11-1) 1. Greenwood Road/Senseny Road 5. Study Intersections 2. Greenwood Road/Site-Driveway #1 6. and/or Road Segments (Attach additional sheets as 3. Senseny Road/ Site -Driveway #2 7. necessary) 4. Senseny Road/ Site -Driveway 8' #2/Groce Avenue Trip Adjustment Internal allowance: ❑ Yes 2 No Pass -by allowance: Z Yes ❑ No Factors Reduction: % trips Reduction: 40 % trips (for Code 853) Software Methodology Q Synchro ❑ HCS (v.2000/+) ❑ aaSIDRA ❑ CORSIM ❑ Other Traffic Signal Proposed or Affected (Analysis software to be used, progression speed, cycle length) Page 2 of 6 • 0 • Administrative Guidelines January 28, 2008 Improvement(s) Assumed or to be Considered Background Traffic Fieldstone, Orrick Property during Year 2010. Additionally, Butcher Studies Considered Property, Lambert -Ward Property, Abrams Pointe, Brairwood III and Miscellaneous other developments along Channing Drive during Year 2016 ❑ Master Development Plan (MDP) Q Generalized Development Plan (GDP) Plan Submission ❑ Preliminary/Sketch Plan ❑ Other Plan type (Final Site, Subd. Plan) Queuing analysis Q Actuation/Coordination ElWeaving analysis Additional Issues to be ❑ Merge analysis Q Bike/Ped Accommodations ❑ Intersection(s) addressed ❑ TDM Measures ❑ Other . NOTES on ASSUMPTIONS: SIGNED: Applicant or Consultant PRINT NAME: Michael Glickman, PE Applicant or Consultant • DATE: 08/26/2008 Page 3 of 6 • • • • • Administrative Guidelines January 28, 2008 No Scale J n c m o f 4 Stafford Of � d O � � n � v� Green P7rk Dr a O Senseny Rd Senseny Rd G1 n JArok��r SITE �nSenyRd a A n � c' yGreen A,p vn in J c �r� ncPMhtp0µ0 Pf R rD -+- . l H1 tL l Figure 1 Vicinity Map: Ervin - Senseny Road Property, in Frederick County, VA Page 4 of 6 • 11 Administrative Guidelines • No Scale 0 0 I Figure 2 Trip Distribution Percentages January 28, 2008 Page 5 of 6 0 0 • E 0 Administrative Guidelines Table 1: Peak Hour of Generator, per Chapter 527 Proposed Development: Senseny Road Property Trip Generation Summary January 28, 2008 Code Land Use Amount AM In Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak (lour Out Total ADT SAT In Peak Four Out Total ADT 853 Conven. Mart w\pumps 4,000 SF 90 90 181 125 125 250 3,382 116 107 222 5,794 881 Pharmacy w/ DT 12,900 SF 50 52 102 61 61 123 1,137 51 51 101 1,137 912 Drive-in Bank 8,000 SF 110 105 215 218 210 428 1,716 151 145 297 629 Total 1 250 248 498 1 405 396 801 1 6,235 318 303 620 1 7,560 Note: In traffic impact analysis, the ITE rates based upon adjacent street traffic will be considered per chapter 527. Table 2: Peak Hour of Adiacent Street Proposed Development: Senseny Road Property Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PNI Peak Hour Out Total ADT In SAT Peak Hour Out Total ADT 853 Conven. Mart w\pumps 4,000 SF 91 91 182 121 121 242 3,382 116 107 222 5,794 881 Phannacy w/ DT 12,900 SF 20 15 34 54 57 111 1,137 51 51 101 1,137 912 Drive-in Bank 8,000 SF 55 43 99 183 183 366 1,716 151 145 297 629 Total 1 166 149 315 1 359 361 720 1 6,235 1 318 303 620 1 7,560 Page 6 of 6 Traffic Counts 0 • 0-tersection: E-W: ISenseny Rd Weatherldry Pile Name N-S: I Greenood Rd Count By JJP Input By JJP Location I Winchester,VA Count Date 5/9/2007 15 Minute EB: Senseny Rd WB: Senseny Rd NB: Greenood Rd SB: Greenood Rd 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thor Right Total Left Thm Right Total Left Thor Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 39 32 11 82 7 39 16 62 7 7 7 21 16 25 44 85 250 7:00 7:15 48 26 14 88 3 45 23 71 8 11 6 25 11 23 51 85 269 7:15 7:30 44 35 14 93 2 44 25 71 15 21 2 38 8 31 54 93 295 7:30 7:45 35 33 11 79 4 47 23 74 10 19 4 33 10 26 70 106 292 7:45 8:00 29 29 9 67 5 36 22 63 10 14 0 24 7 23 55 85 239 8:00 8:15 24 22 15 61 5 34 22 61 12 9 1 22 9 16 53 78 222 8:15 8:30 32 16 12 60 3 54 17 74 10 7 2 19 12 24 53 89 242 8:30 8:45 37 18 11 66 4 62 13 79 10 9 3 22 11 25 49 85 252 8:45 A.M. Total 288 211 97 596 33 361 161 555 82 97 25 204 84 193 429 706 2061 A.M. Total 16:00 57 48 15 120 6 44 11 61 16 29 5 50 25 33 88 146 377 16:00 16:15 62 44 13 119 6 57 16 79 18 25 7 50 19 28 77 124 372 16:15 16:30 63 51 12 126 8 56 21 85 17 30 8 55 20 25 69 114 380 16:30 16:45 66 44 17 127 8 55 20 83 21 35 5 61 21 25 85 131 402 16:45 17:00 79 48 16 143 9 46 16 71 20 36 4 60 17 31 77 125 399 17:00 17:15 77 49 22 148 4 53 14 71 23 51 6 80 28 25 74 127 426 17:15 17:30 63 53 23 139 5 51 17 73 16 40 9 65 25 29 74 128 405 17:30 17:45 60 47 19 126 5 58 14 77 15 27 8 50 19 29 111 159 412 17:45 P.M. Total 527 384 137 1048 51 420 129 600 146 273 52 471 174 225 655 1054 3173 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: Senseny Rd WB: Senseny Rd NB: Greenood Rd SB: Greenood Rd 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thm Right Total Left Thm Right Total Left Thm Right Total Left Thm Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 166 126 50 342 16 175 87 278 40 58 19 117 45 105 219 369 1106 7:00 7:15 156 123 48 327 l4 172 93 279 43 65 12 120 36 103 230 369 1095 7:15 7:30 132 119 49 300 16 161 92 269 47 63 7 117 34 96 232 362 1048 7:30 7:45 120 100 47 267 17 171 84 272 42 49 7 98 38 89 231 358 995 7:45 8:00 122 85 47 254 17 186 74 277 42 39 6 87 39 88 210 337 955 8:00 16:00 248 187 57 492 28 212 68 308 72 119 25 216 85 lit 319 515 1531 16:00 16:15 270 187 58 515 31 214 73 318 76 126 24 226 77 109 308 494 L553 16:15 16:30 285 192 67 544 29 210 71 310 81 152 23 256 86 106 305 497 1607 16:30 16:45 285 194 78 557 26 205 67 298 80 162 24 266 91 110 310 511 1632 1645 17:00 279 197 80 556 23 208 61 292 74 154 27 255 89 114 336 539 1642 17:00 1 Hour EB: Senseny Rd WB: Senseny Rd NB: Greenood Rd SB: Greenood Rd Period N,S, Begining Left Thm Right Total Left Thm Right Total Left Thm Right Total Left Thm Right Total E & W pA.M.Peak 7:00 166 126 50 342 16 175 87 278 40 58 19 117 45 105 219 369 1106 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.92 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.77 PHF = 0.87 0.94 17:00279 197 80 556 23 208 6l 292 74 154 27 255 89 114 336 539 1642P.M. Peak PHF = 0.94 PHP = 0.95 PHP = 0.80 PHF = 0.85 0.96 0 9 • 0 Senseny Road & Greenwood Road File Name : SensenyRd&GreenwoodRd_SAT Location: Winchester, VA Site Code Time: SAT Mid -day Peak Start Date : 4/19/2008 Analyst: PHR+A Page No : 1 GREENWOOD RD SENSENY RD GREENWOOD RD SENSENY RD From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru I LeftT Peds Int. Total 11:00 AM 41 38 14 0 22 45 5 0 9 26 7 0 12 37 34 0 290 11:15 AM 62 30 21 0 10 39 3 0 7 35 9 0 11 32 45 0 30�j 11:30 AM 48 24 12 0 11 37 3 0 10 18 7 0 4 35 53 1 26: 11:45 AM 50 38 12 0 8 32 2 0 15 23 7 0 5 25 43 0 260 Total 201 130 59 0 51 153 13 0 41 102 30 0 32 129 175 1 1117 12:00 PM 50 18 21 0 17 35 2 0 7 30 10 0 10 42 44 0 286 12:15 PM 51 42 16 0 17 41 4 0 6 38 4 0 7 32 55 0 313 12:30 PM 71 38 17 0 16 65 5 0 7 24 10 0 7 37 60 0 357 12:45 PM 53 40 16 0 17 54 3 0 8 26 7 0 9 36 56 0 325 Total 225 138 70 0 67 195 14 0 28 118 31 0 33 147 215 0 1 1281 Grand Total 426 268 129 0 118 348 27 0 69 220 61 0 65 276 390 1 2398 Apprch % 51.8 32.6 15.7 0 23.9 70.6 5.5 0 19.7 62.9 17.4 0 8.9 37.7 53.3 0.1 Total % 17.8 11.2 5.4 0 4.9 14.5 1.1 0 2.9 9.2 2.5 0 2.7 11.5 16.3 0 426 268 129 0 118 348 27 0 69 220 61 0 65 276 390 1 2398 % 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 GREENWOOD RD From North SENSENY RD From East GREENWOOD RD From South SENSENY RD From West Start Time Ri ht I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Tota( Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total I Right I Thru I Left I Peds I App. Total Peak Hour Analysis From 11:00 AM to 12:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1 „--'- „--- r__ I-.:-- - ____.:__ o _:__ 1I.nn nre Int Total -Y 12:00 PM 50 18 21 0 89 17 35 2 0 54 7 30 10 0 47 10 42 44 0 96 286 12:15 PM 51 42 16 0 109 17 41 4 0 62 6 38 4 0 48 7 32 55 0 94 313 12:30 PM 71 38 17 0 126 16 65 5 0 86 7 24 10 0 41 7 37 60 0 104 357 12:45 PM 53 40 16 0 109 17 54 3 0 74 8 26 7 0 41 9 36 56 0 101 325 Total Volume 225 138 70 0 433 67 195 14 0 276 28 118 31 0 177 33 147 215 0 395 1281 % Apo. Total 52 31.9 16.2 0 24.3 70.7 5.1 0 15.8 66.7 17.5 0 8.4 37.2 54.4 0 PHF 1 .792 .821 .833 .000 .859 1 .985 .750 .700 .000 .802 .875 .776 .775 .000 .922 .825 .875 .896 .000 .950 .897 0 0 0 •I Bri923FG0713 OWNER, S; CONFIRMATION OF PLAT I, the undersigned property owner, acquired by certain deeds that were recorded among the Land Records of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 261, at Page 399 and Deed Hook 190, at Page 441, respectively and by Will recorded in Will Hook 68, at Page 460. This property has been surveyed by Edward W. Dove, L.S., of Dove & Associates, and is shown on a plat dated July 1, 1998, which is attached hereto. We confirm this plat as being correct to the best of our knowledge and belief, and we hereby request that this plat be recorded among the Land Records of Frederick County, Virginia. r /v wv C, Cora C. Smith, Land owner STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE CITY OF WINCHESTER, TO -WIT: I� V�YICI� S,�1c'�11�2 certify that Cora C. Smith, whose name is signed above, personally appeared before me in the City of Winchester, Virginia, and acknowledged the same on December 1998. My commission expires I I a 0 , ......... a i Not ry Public co ,C ..... 0 0 E • • 5 y.:::•�:,: •�. n4. ..• m H, 923PG07 [lt SENSENY ROAD N ROUTE 657 VAI"ABLE R/W SIB ,RJ 21.2• I SIMY BL001( t FRAME R1;S 04E e rau �aTm) s7w- w� S70p'covcw HOUSE DETAIL SCALE.' 1' — 80' 15?2'10' E 61.85, s'`N 6071'12' E 2J 57' J7971' E 50.81, i 1 THIS IS M aR17FY THAT ON AlLI Y 1. 1998 • I MADE AN ACCURA7E SOR�EY DF ME PRE415£S 910W HEREa`d AND THAT THERE ARE NO EAS£- HOMW LOCA 770M SURVEY MEHrS a4 EHC40Aa41EN7S NSIBLE ay THE ay GROUNO on1ER THAN THOSE SHORN IEWaV. WE PROPERTY OF NOIES• n/�pA C.CI1/77J l�ORA lip JRT 1r7 I. UX ASSESSNDvrMAP NO. 55A-A-196 (PARCEL 1) TAX AswssNENTMAP No.. 65A-2-1 (LOT 1) DEW EKaA1( 190 PA6F 441 (PARM 1) y aIRRE7VT W57RUMENT ml CHAIN OF nRE IS OEw sow 261 PAGE' J99 (LOT v Ma BOCK 68 PACE 460 511ANNEE OVSTRICT pAEDEfNOY G10UN1Y, NRG71V/A z Rs a R®AR ro BE sEr, = RffiAR TOUALC 1P1. _ D7aY PIP£ FOUND THIS PUT HAS SEEN PREPARE() WITHOUT THE 9FHERT OF A TITLE REPORT � 'j.//�r:/� 1998 SALE iC AND DOES NOT NECESSMILY HDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPENTL' n (�i11111YT 11•,'1 H aNn1Eh 5MI7N of •. FLOOD NOTE - '�'• 17 •:, ZGWE C COMMUN/7Y No.' 51006J PANEL' 0115 B .:1 :DA ME .7-17. 78 . Gyf i iVJ•1 .'..; 1 ENGINEERS PLANNERS 1`�.,% - mwARo W. DovE & ASSOCIATES SURVEYORS 3078 SHAWNEE DRIVE P.O. BOX 2033 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (540)667-1103 CERT. NO. 54-17-3(A) 964 A `/hh v suR�� • L� • E 0 6K923501 15 vwcWA. acCOUK 1C SM ,wri . iD nt ;d ;th &.jM=Iq al a[knowladpmanl [hereto enne,.c.i was d �p rpootd. Tax Imposed by Sec. 5e.1-602 ui N/�✓ arld 6L1401 have been paid, It assessable. 4�el-9,01 Clerk 0 c- 0 0 w II� I, CORA C. SMITH, of Frederick -County, Virginia, being of v sound and disposing mind and memory, do hereby make, publish and declare this to be my Last Will and Testament, hereby revoking all prior Wills or Codicils thereto by me made. ARTICLE I FIRST, I direct that all my legally enforceable debts, taxes and funeral expenses (including a suitable monument or marker for my grave) be paid as soon as practicable, without being required to exhaust personalty before realty. All estate and inheritance taxes upon or in respect to any property deemed to be a part of my estate for tax purposes, whether such taxes be payable by my estate or by a recipient of any such property, shall be paid by my Executor out of the residue of my estate, without being recovered from or • apportioned against the share of any recipient. ARTICLE II SECOND, I give, devise and bequeath as follows: 1. -The bow front china cabinet, if owned by me at the time of my death, absolutely, unto Sandra L. Love. 2. The sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000,00) to each of the :..^.ilCwirtg who our4`ive me, ab6viutciy : Dora Graves, Irene Pierce, Eva DeHaven, Scarlet M. Jenkins, Douglas L. Clark, Sr. and Jacqueline DeHaven. 3. I give and devise any real estate owned by me at the time of my death, including my home, unto Sandra L. Love, in fee simple, if she survives me. In the event the said Sandra L. Love predeceases me, then I devise any real estate owned by me at the time of my death, including my home, to my Executor hereinafter named to sell as soon as possible after my death and thereafter to divide the net proceeds equally among the named beneficiaries who 0 0 0 co f_ survive me as listed hereinabove in Article II, Paragraph B. 4. All the rest and residue of my estate, whether real, personal or mixed property, I give, devise and bequeath in equal shares to the named beneficiaries who survive me as listed hereinabove in Article II, Paragraph B, provided, however, that Dora Graves shall have her choice of one of the three rocking chairs, if any, owned by me at the time of my death. ARTICLE III THIRD, for convenient administration, my Executor shall have all the authority conferred upon a fiduciary by Section 64.1-57 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, as in force at the date of my death, as though fully set forth herein. • ARTICLE IV FOURTH, I nominate and appoint my niece, Sandra L. Love, as Executor of this Will, and I request that my Executor be permitted to serve without giving surety upon her official bond. In the event that my named Executor shall predecease me or fail to qualify or complete the administration of my estate, then I direct that Jacqueline DeHaven shall be Executor with full authority to complete the admi nistrat4 on of the estate tf?o.;t eurety bona • ARTICLE V A. Where appropriate, the masculine as used in this Will shall include the feminine and neuter, the singular the plural, and vice versa. B. I may leave a letter of intent with my Executor, or another person, for the purpose of giving guidance to my Executor in the distribution of my estate among the foregoing beneficiaries, and I request that, but do not require, that my Executor honor my wishes therein expressed. J 2 - 0 , . 0 • C. Any beneficiary who fails to survive me by one hundred twenty (120) hours shall be deemed to have predeceased me, and the gift to such beneficiary shall be disposed of accordingly. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have on this 9th day of August, 1999, set my hand and seal to this my Will consisting of four (4) pages. C'0, C_V (SEAT,) Cora C. Smith The foregoing signature of the Testator was made and the foregoing Will was acknowledged to be her Last Will and Testament, by the Testator, in the presence of us, two (2) competent witnesses, present at the same time; and we, the said witnesses, do hereunto subscribe the said Will on the date last above written, in the presence of the Testator and of each other, at the request of the Testator, who was then of sound mind and over the age of Ae'g teen (18) years. \ in �Y- ST TE OF VIRGINIA, AT GE, CITY OF WINCHESTER, To -wit: Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day, personally a p ared Cora C. Smith, L , /L �O. w (Q� l Lim and " known to me to be the Testator and witnesses, respectively, whose names are signed to the foregoing instrument and, all of these persons being by me first duly sworn, Cora C. Smith, the Testator, declared to me and to the witnesses, in my presence, that said instrument is her Last Will and Testament and that she had willingly signed the same, and executed it in the presence of the said witnesses as her free and voluntary act for the purposes therein expressed; that said witnesses stated before me that the foregoing Will was executed and acknowledged by the Testator as her Last Will and Testament in the presence of said witnesses who, in her presence and at her request, - 3 - • and in the presence of each other, did subscribe their names =� thereto as attesting witnesses on the day of the date of said Will, and that the Testator, at the time of the execution of said Will, was over the age of eighteen (18) years and of sound and disposing mind and memory. Sworn and /acknowledged before me ECLlk-k- witnesses, ora C. Smith, the Testator, � l� GJ Q o and this 9th day of August, 1999. My commission expires June 30, 2002. Notary Public - 4 - • 9 LIST OF TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY OF CORA C. SMITH In accordance with Section 64.1-45.1 of the 1950 Code of Virginia, as amended, and pursuant to my Last Will and Testament, I give the following items of tangible personal property to the person (as specified in this document): 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. DONEE ITEM DESCRIPTION/LOCATION DATED this day of Cora C. Smit 1999. 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Camra Database el ID Number 55 A 196 6 )rd Number 0015915 Owners Name LOVE SANDRA Owners Name Continued Owners Address 503 OLD KITCHEN RD Owners Address Continued WHITE POST VA ZIP 22663 Acreage 1.62 Zoning RP Total Improvments 58300 Total Land Value 84000 Total Property Value 142300 Physical House Number 1932 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number Deed Book Page Number 0 Instrument Year 2006 Instrument Number 182 Building Sq Ft 1056 Month Last Sold 8 Day Last Sold 4 Year Last Sold 2006 Selling Price 0 0`11 Description 1.62 ACRES 70 Page 1 of ] Camra Database ID Number 65A 2 1 .cel jrd Number 0020887 Owners Name LOVE SANDRA Owners Name Continued Owners Address 503 OLD KITCIIEN RD Owners Address Continued WIIITE POST VA ZIP 22663 Acreage 0 Zoning RP Total Improvments 0 Total Land Value 50000 Total Property Value 50000 Physical House Number 0 Physical Street Name Deed Book Number Deed Book Page Number 0 Instrument Year 2006 Instrument Number 182 Building Sq Ft 0 Month Last Sold 8 Day Last Sold 4 Year Last Sold 2006 Selling Price 0 al Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L1 h}+. •llnia nn fi•n �nrin�� fro nAoo ool litnil zimamone . � Page 1 or Can-ira Database el ID Number 65A 2 12 0 lord Number 0020869 Owners Name MASON KENNETII L. & SHIRLEY A. Owners Name Continued Owners Address 1930 SENSENY RD Owners Address Continued WINCHESTER VA ZIP 22602 Acreage 0 Zoning R' Total Improvnlents 80000 Total Land Value 54500 Total Property Value 134500 Physical House Number 1930 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number 299 Deed Book Page Number 174 Instrument Year 0 Instrument Number 0 Building Sq Ft 1149 Month Last Sold 0 Day Last Sold 0 Year Last Sold 0 Selling Price 0 •.al Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L2 �l -t�h_� A/(`l;P„i/PnhlirArrPcc]In intFrAllle.htlll1 3/26/200< i 153 47972 BK635Pc153 THIS IS A CREDIT LINE DEED OF TRUST This CREDIT LINE DEED OF TRUST made and dated this —day of December Z 1986 by and between Kenneth L. Mason and Shirley Ann Mason, his wife , the Grantors, and Flournoy L. Larvent, Jr. of Winchester, Virginia, the Trustee, and the Farniors and Merchants National BanK, IIS N. Cameron Street, P. O Box 2800. Winchester, Virginia 22601, the NOTEHOLDER WITNESSETH That for valuable consideration the Grantors hereby grant and convey with General Warranty of Title and English Covenants of Title unto the trustees all of that certain real property, more particularly described as follows PARCEL ONE All of that certain lot of land, lying and being situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, designated as Lot No. 2 on the plat and survey of Lee A. Ebert, dated March 1957, of the Greenwood Heights Subdivision No. 1., of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 246, Page 453; and being the same property conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed of Edwin S. Mason, et ux, dated April 17, 1964, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 299, Page 174; PARCEL TWO All of that certain lot of land, together with the improvements thereon and the appurtenance thereunto belongina, lying and being situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, described as Lot No. 3 on the survey and plat of Lee A. Ebert, dated March 1957 of the Greenwood Heights Subdivision No. One, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 246, Page 456, and being the same property conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed of Edwin S. Mason, et ux, dated November 21, 1975, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 451, Page 807, LESS AND EXCEPTING: that certain small portion conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia for improvements of Route 657, by deed dated Mary 12, 1970, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 366, Page 690. In Trust Nevertheless To sacitre the covenants herein contained and the payment of all indebtedness of the Grantors to the NOTEHOLDER, whether now existing or hereafter arising, direct or Indirect. fixed or contingent. matured or unmatured, liquidated or unliquidaled, secured or unsecured, whether contracted by the grantors alone, jointly or jointly and severally will, another The said indebtedness may. but need not be, evidenced by a promissory note or notes made by the Grantors The indebtedness shall however be subject to the terms and provisions of that certain credit agreement dated the — day of 198—, executed by the Grantors and the NOTEHOLDER The amount of the said +ndublodnoss st, urod by this Credit Line Dead of Trust shall not exceed in the aggregate at anyone time, during the term of the Credit Agreement. the principal sum of Seven Thousand F { vF thine, rnr9 Dollarsis 7,500. 00 ) plus interest thereon and the costs of collection related there!^ The Grantors further covenant and agree as follows (a)Tothe extent that any Grantor is the maker, endorser or guarantor of the Secured Indebtedness, such Grantor shall pay the principal of and interest on such Secured Indebtedness. together with all other sums due thereunder, when and as the same shall become due (b) The Grantor shall maintain the Premises and the Property in good condition and repair (c) The Grantor shall keep the buildings and improvements now and hereafter erected on the Premises and all Property insured against loss and damage by fire with extended coverage and shall maintain public liability insurance, malicious mischief insurance and insurance against such other hazards as the NOTEHOLDER may reasonably require. In amounts, with insurors and under forms of policies (including waiver of subrogation and standard noncontributing mortgages clauses) reasonably satisfactory to ilia NOTEHOLDER, shall deliver all such policies and, at least 15 days prior to their expiration dates, all renewals thereof to the NOTEHOLDER, and shell pay all premiums thereon W) The Grantor will not create or permit to exist, directly or indirectly, any deed of trust, mortgage, lien, encumbrance, charge or other exception to title upon or against the Premises. Property or the Rents and Profits, other than as expressly consented to by the NOTEHOLDER, which consent the NOTEHOLDER shall be under no obligation to give• (e) The Grantor shall make no assignment of rents or leases relating to the Premises without the prior written consent of the NOTEHOLDER. (f) In the event that any proceedings to take the Premises or any part thereof byexercise of the power of eminent domain are undertaken or threatened, the Grantor shalt give the NOTEHOLDER prompt notice thereof. Any award made to the Grantor shall be paid to ilia NOTEHOLDER, and the Grantor hereby appoints the NOTEHOLDER as its attorney in fact to recotve andgive all appropriate discharges for anysuch award Any such award shall, at the option of the NOTEHOLDER be applied in reduction of the Secured Indebtedness, whether then matured or not. (g)The Grantor shall protect, Indemnify and save harmless the?rustees and the NOTEHOLDER from and against all liabilities. obligations, claims, damages, penalties, causes of action, costs and expenses (including, without Ilmitation, attorney's fees and expenses) Imposed upon or incurred by or asserted against the Trustees of the NOTEHOLDER by reason of any failure on the part of the Grantor to perform or comply with any of the covenants or conditions of this Deed of Truitt. • • 0 77 BK635PG154 j(h)This Grantor shell, at the Grantor's axpenee, execute, deliver, Iris and record such deeds and other documents as the NOTEHOLDER may require in order to confirm or perfect its interest in the Premises, including, without limitation, any supplemental deed of trust or modification agreement required by the NOTEHOLDER to extend the period of priority afforded to advances of the Secured Indebtedness by Soclron 55.58 2 of the Code of Virginia and any successor provisions of law 1 (iI The Grantor shall pay upon demand all expenses incurrred or paid by the NOTEHOLDER or the Trustees I (including, but not limited to, attorney's fees and court costs) on account of any litigation which may arise in connecron Wtlh this Dead of Trust or The Secured Indebtedness, or on account of any attempt without it ligation to enforce the terms of this Deed of Trust or the Secured Indebtedness It is further agreed that events of default are (a) II default shall me made in ilia due and punctual payment of any sum due under the Secured Indebtedness end such default shall continue for a period of 5 days or such longer period as may be required by low, (b) If default shall be made by ilia Grantor in the performance of or compliance with any of the covenants, agreements, terins and conditions contained in this Deed of Trust or tho Credit Agreement and such default shall continuo for a period of ten days after written notice thereof from NOTEHOLDER to the Grantor (c) If on involuntary position in bankruptcy or any other petition shall be filed against ilia Grantor, any general partner of the Grantor, or any Guarantor seeking any reorganisation, arrangement, composition, readjustment, liquidation, dissolution or similar relief under any present or future federal, state or other statute. law or regulation, and shall remain undismissed for thirty (30) days, or if any custodian, trustee, receiver or liquidator of all or any substantial part of the properties of ilia Grantor, any general partner of the Grantor, or any Guarantor or of the Premises shall be appointed or take possession of such properties without the consent or acquiescence of the Grantor, such general partner or Guarantor and such appointment shall remain unvacated for thirty (30) days (d) It any final judgment or decree for the payment of money in an amount of more than $5,000 00 is entered against the Grantor or any Guarantor, all applicable poriods for appeal have terminated and such judgment or decree is not satisfied within ten (10) days thereafter (e) If any judgment creditor or henof attempts to enforce its rights against the Promises or the Properly or if any event of default shall occur under any morlijager or deed of trust constituting a lien against tire Premises, whether such lien is prior or subordinate to the hen of this Deed of Trust If) II the Grantor sells. conveys transfefs. leases, encumbers or otherwise disposes of the Premises, or any rights of the Grantor related thereto, without the prior written consent of the NOTEHOLDER, which consent may be withheld with or without cause Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default, the NOTEHOLDER may, at its option and without further notice, declare the Secured Indebtedness Immediately due and payable and shall have ilia right to have the Trustess take possession of the Premises and proceed to sell the Premises, as a whole or in parcels, at a public auction, for cash or Credit. at such time and place and upon such terms and conditons as the Trustees shall deem appropriate Before such sale at public auction is made. there shall first be advertisement of the time, place and terms of safe at least once a week for two successive weeks in some newspaper having general circulation in the county or city in which the Premises are located, and there shall be given, at least 14 days prior to such sale. written notice of the time, place and farms of sale by certified or registered mad to the then owner of the Premises at such owner's last know address. as such owner and address appear on the records of the NOTEHOLDER The NOTE HOLDER inay become the purchaser of the properly so sold and no purchaser shall be required to see to the proper application of the purchase money except as may be required by Section 58.762 o1 ilia Code of Virginia and any successor provision of law which section relates to the payment of real astatetaxes The proceeds of any such sale shall beapptiedasfollows first. to discharge the expenses of executing ilia trust, Including a reasondblo comnussion to the Trustees not to exceed live per centum (5%) of the gross proceeds of sale. secondly, to discharge all taxes, levies and assessments, with costs and interest if Ihey have priority overt lie hen of this Deed of Trust, including the due pro rate thereof for the current year. thirdly, to discharge in the order of their pno nty, if any, the remaining debts and obligations secured by this Deed of Trust, and any hens of record Inferior to this Deed of Trust, with lawful interest andfourthly I lie residue of the proceeds %hall be itaid to ilia Grantor or the Gi a nior's assigns, provided, however, that the Trustees shall not be bound by any inheritance, dowse, conveyanre, assignment or lien o1 or upon the Grantor's equity, without actualnotice thereof prior todisiribution Any failure or delay by the NOTE HOLDER in exercising any right hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver of the right to exercise the same or any other right at any time Upon any such default, the Trustee, at the request of the NOTEHOLDER, shall have the absolute right to enter the Premises and take possession thereof, and the Grantor agrees to surrender the Premises to the Trustees promptly upon demand The Trustees shall have the right to operate the Premises themselves or through agents appointed by them and id receive the Rents and Profits there(rom All such Rents and Profits shall be applied to a reasonable compensation to the Trustees for their services and to the expenses of operating the Premises, with any excess to be applied to payment of interest on and ilia principal of Ilia Secured Indebtedness In the event of any default in the performance of the covenants contained herein, the NOTEHOLDER shall have ilia tight, but shall not be obligated to enter the Premises, if necessary, and perform such covenants, and all costs iliereol shall be securedby this Deed of Trust and shall be paid. together with interest thereon at the highest rate of interest applicable to the Secured Indebtedness. by the Grantor to the NOTEHOLDER upon aemand therefor The peitumiance of any such cover ant by iha NOTEHOLDER, however, shall not be deemed a waiver of default Any notice or demand required lobe sent or delivered to the Grantor shall be sent or delivered to the Grantor at the Premises or at such other place as the Grantor or it succesors in interest shell designate in writing to the NOTEHOLDER The address at which communications maybe mailed or delivered to the NOTE14OLDER is 116 North Cameron Street, P O Box 2800, Winchester, Virginia 22601 NOTICE - THE DEBT SECURED HEREBY IS SUBJECT TO CALL IN FULL OR THE TERMS THEREOF BEING MUDfFIED iN THE EVENT OF SALE OR CONVEYANCE OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED. The Covenants and agreements herein contained shall bind and the benefits and advantages shall inure to the respective heirs, executors. administrators, successors and assigns of the Grantor, the Trustee and the NOTEHOLDER Wherever used, the singular number shall include the plura), the plural the singular, end the use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders If any term or provision of this Deed of Trust shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Deed of Trust shall not he affected thereby The provisions of Section 55.58 2 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, ere incorporated herein by this reference Tne following provisions of Section 55-60 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as emended and in effect on the date of this Deed of Trust, are incorporated herein by this reference thereto Exemptions waived Renewal, extension or reinstatement permitted Substitution of Trustee permitted at the discretion of the NOTEHOLDER for any reason whatsoever Any Trustee may act Bidder's deposit of not more that 10% of the sale price may be required 155 8�635Pc155 • WfTNE8G the tollowino signatures: K•2�TH L. MASON y ..........' SHIRLEY,N MASON ' 1}ZY"'� 4 (Individual Acknowledgment) n XTt OF V FIGINiA. r. OF to -wit: The foregoing Instrument was acknowledged before me IN,. - 4ay of =EPr GI LTA 19891-by Kenneth L. Mason and Shirley Ann Mason, his wife. My commmission expires (Notary Public) 1RG'NIA FREDERICK CGUN, Y. SCr I G Tt" estrum •t l -ItIN was produemi to ton on d'e fty at •• _-•• —•_•— .t ux1 with cerhhcato of xknowlcdgment ttwato annexed was Wmlt ter record. u Page I of 1 Camra Database 10el ID Number A Number Owners Name Owners Name Continued Owners Address Owners Address Continued ZIP Acreage Zoning Total Improvments Total Land Value Total Property Value Physical Iouse Number Physical Street Name Deed Book Number Deed Book Page Number Instrument Year Instrument Number Building Sq Ft Month Last Sold Day Last Sold Year Last Sold Selling Price al Description 65A 2 1 3 0020870 MASON KENNETH L 1930 SENSENY RD WINCIIESTER VA 22602 0 RP 0 50000 50000 0 & SHIRLEY A. 451 807 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L3 ecI /nvi 1-047111-1ir> ht1Y11 06/?0OR i • 81(953PG0928 THIS DEED, made and dated this -QJ day of 9_- pur3uant to Separation and Property Settlement Agreement dated September 28, 1999, by and between FRANKLIN B. ANDERSON and JOETTE M. ANDERSON, husband and wife, parties of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantors; and FRANKLIN B. ANDERSON, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantee. WITNESSETH; That for and in consideration of the sum of the mutual benefits to be derived therefrom, the Grantors do grant and convey, with General Warranty and with English Covenants of Title, unto the Grantee, in fee simple absolute, all of the following realty; All of LhaL cel Lail lot or parcel of !and, together :^.rich the improvements thereon and the appurtenances thereunto belonging, lying and being situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, described as LOT NO. 4, GREENWOOD HEIGHTS SUBDIVISION NO. 1, as more particularly described by survey of Lae A. Ebert, C.L.S., dated December 19, 1985, attached to the hereinafter mentioned deed and by this reference made a part hereof as if set out in full; AND BEING the same property conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed dated December 31, 1985, from Robert Pifer, at ux, of record in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 608 at Page $48. Reference is here made to the aforesaid instruments, the attachments thereto and the references therein contained for a further and more particular description of the property hereby conveyed. �� uuuY 4Us1 ATTORNEYS Al LAW 20SOUTH KE!(rfrfttET IVINGHESTEH. VIHGINIA IMI D�, 953PG0929' This conveyance is made subject to all legally enforceable restrictive covenants and easements of record affecting the aforesaid realty. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: • �� Qror) — _t EALI FRANKLIN .'ANI ERSON - G XLR€A L) E- E M. AN ERSON STATE OF 1 to -wit, L>> _OF L 1)1nownl±-s-yct vv 14-, a Notary Public in and for the State and jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that FRANKLIN BAnON, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, bearing date of thay of �`9_, has this day personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and jurisdiction aforesaid. Given under my hand this i�\ day of No`",,r�iA�r ��t99 NOTARY BLIC My commission expires r 2 *' ULLY A GLA> ATTONNEYI AT LAW ]0 ] W Tlt KENT STRE ET WINLNEVEn. V INGINIA I 1 _ - - --ras��sai�- ox.9, '-T,0930 STATE OF V. C OF �lr,el,p Y. �l�a Y� to -wit: a Notary Public in and for the State and jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that JOETTE MAND`ERSON �whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed, bearing date of the day of uc ✓ -has this day personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and jurisdiction aforesaid. ,� rr Given under my hand this A3,-IV day of t'Jembs-f SCE NOTARY PUB IC MY commission expires 9 - :L i - 0: VIRGIPIIA: FREDERICK COUNTY, 5CI'• This instrument ()[writing was produced to me onnii% at ----- " and with certificate of acltnowledeement thereto annexed was admitted to record.'1':Lr imposed by Sec. 58.1.902 of S N and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable Lf%fe.¢ Clerk 3 LY iA" A nH EY9 AT LAW II A p0UT/1 KEHT 6TilE ET WINCHESTER, VIHGINIA 7]/A I Page 1 of ; Camra Database el ID Number 65A 2 1 4 n-d Number 0020871 Owners Name ANDERSON FRANKLIN B Owners Name Continued Owners Address 1948 SENSENY RD Owners Address Continued WINCIIESTER VA ZIP 22602 Acreage 0 Zoning RP Total Improvments 104200 Total Land Value 54500 Total Property Value 158700 Physical House Number 1948 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number 953) Deed Book Page Number 928 Instrument Year 0 Instrument Number 0 Building Sq Ft 1200 Month Last Sold 12 Day Last Sold 2 Year Last Sold 1999 Selling Price 0 d Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L4 • �6 �ux�r oar ATTd'It[Tl AT UV( f gUTM IRMTy7RtlT „{YOlpTill, VI/IQN IA ]JMI OX972PG0754 THIS DEED, made and dated this 31st day of July 2000, by and between KAM AND KRUEGER REAL ESTATE PARTNERIMII!, a virgfnln 0"rd Partnership, party of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantor; and DONALD E. 6TRAU35, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantee. WITNESSETH, That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars 010.00i, cash in hand paid and as part of an I.R.C. Sectkin 1031 Tax Deferred Exchange, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor does hereby grant end convey, with General Warranty and with English Covenants of Title, unto the Grantee, in fee simple absolute, all of the following realty; All of that certain lot or parcel of land, together with all rights, rights of way, privileges, improvements thereon and appurtenances theraunto belonging, lying and being situate In Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, designated as Lot No. 6 an the Greenwood Heights Subdivision No. 1 Plat and Survey which Is recorded In the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Dead Book 246 at Pages 453 through 456, LESS AND EXCEPT that certain conveyance to the Commonwealth of Virginia by Deed dated May 12, 1970, and recorded in the aforesaid Clark's Office in Dead Book 366 at Page 673; AND BEiNG the same property conveyed to Kayes and Krueger Boat Estate Partnership, a Virginia General Partnership, as specific partnership property, by deed dated May 31, 1988, from Joseph J. Harter, homme sole, of record in the aforesaid C Igc!_ a Office in Deed Rook 682 at Page 201. not iranco is r1ara made to ilia aforssald Instrumants, the cttachniw,ta thereto and the references therein contained for a further ariJ more particular description of the property hereby conveyed. • DR972PG0755 f This conveyance is made subject to all legally enforceable restrictive covenants and easements of record affecting the aforesaid realty. In Witness Whereof, Kayes and Krueger Real Estate Partnership, a Virginia General Partnership, has caused this deed to be executed by JOHN R. KRUEGER and BOBETTA A. KRUEGER, Partners, on behalf of said Partnership WITNESS the following signature and seal: KAYES AND KRUEGER REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP /, BY: C /� (SEAL) JOHN R. KRUEGER,"Partner 2 B1>�^(SEAL) BOBETTA A. KR GER artner STATE OF VIRGINIA • CITY OF WINCHESTER, to -wit: I, Kelly Jo Fitzgerald a Notary Public in and for the State and jurisdiction aforesaid, do hereby certify that JOHN R. KRUEGER and BOBETTA A. KRUEGER, Partners, on behalf of KAYES AND KRUEGER REAL ESTATE PARTNERSHIP, whose names are signed to the foregoing Deed, bearing date of the 31st day of July , 2000, have this day personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and jurisdiction aforesaid. Given under my hand this 31st day of July 2000. .y t f NOTARY �PU;'�'IC- My commission expires June 30, 2001 SCULLY k �' VIRGINM FRF-DERICK COUNTY. SCC. ATTORNEYS AT LAW ' 202OUTH KENT STREET This instrument of witing was produced to Rle on . WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA p/ , 7750I /1 It and with certificate of acknowledgement thereto Stinexed i was adntf tied to reand. Tax imposed by Sec.58.1.802 of utd 58.1-801 have been paid, if tLracsaable ,Clerk Page 1 of 1 Camra Database el ID Number 65A 2 1 5 -)rd Number 0020872 Owners Name STRAUSS DONALD E Owners Name Continued Owners Address 1958 SENSE -NY RD Owners Address Continued WINCHESTER VA ZIP 22602 Acreage 0 Zoning RP "Total Improvments 119100 "Total Land Value 54500 Total Property Value 173600 Physical House Number 1958 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number 972 Deed Book Page Number 754 Instrument Year 0 Instrument Number 8060 Building Sq Ft 1508 Month Last Sold 8 Day Last Sold 1 Year Last Sold 2000 Sellina Price 95000 al Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L5 0, 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Camra Database el ID Number 55 A 196 Ircl Number 0015915 G.. .,ers Name LOVE SANDRA Owners Name Continued Owners Address 503 OLD KITCHEN RD Owners Address Continued WHITE POST VA ZIP 22663 Acreage 1.62 Zoning RP Total Improvments 58300 Total Land Value 84000 Total Property Value 142300 Physical House Number 1932 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number Deed Book Page Number 0 Instrument Year 2006 Instrument Number 182 Building Sq Ft 1056 Month Last Sold 8 Day Last Sold 4 Year Last Sold 2006 Selling Price 0 ibc,al Description 1.62 ACRES • littp://gis.co.fredcrick.va.us/Freeance/Client/PublicAccessI/I)rintFrame.htmi 4/l /2008 ViewDetail 0 0 Page l of 1 Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail 2008 REAL ESTATE TAXES Department# : RE2008 Ticket #: 228100001 FRQ:F Sup#: F Name: LOVE SANDRA Account#: 15915 Name 2: Map#: 55 A 196 503 OLD KITCHEN RD p 1 62 AC Address: Description: RES WHITE POST VA 22663 _ _... ...... .. . Bill Date: 06104I2008 Due Date: 06/05/2008 Land: $84,000. Original Bill: $373 54 Penalty Paid: Amount Owed: Total Owed: I_ Iz<uprove: $58,300 Use: ...0. Payments: .......... 54-` $373.: .,... _.._... _ ._. , Acres: F 1.62 Int Paid: Other. j Last Date: 05/30/2008 ....... ___.._...... Penalty: Interest: F Note that if payment has been received within the last 10 business days, any returned items may not be posted at this time. Please check the wrebsite again. • • Date 1)Ype TI-ansaction f/ Amount t3akince 6/5/2008 Charge 0 $373.54 $373.54 5/30/2008 Payment 15678 ($373.54) $0.00 1 3,..-. 5,..,. browser _, a. �+ - �' r f+aT o �n A fri i' iid..ei ras: JJe utc print t�cy fluor your u■ owse to pima is copy :,a au.�a o paaa.. j � . New Search. Prevlotas https://www.co.frederick.va.us/applications/REPubliclnquiry/ViewDetail.aspx 7/3/2008 • Page 1 of 1 Camra Database cel ID Number 65A 2 1 ud Number 0020887 G -ners Name LOVE SANDRA Owners Name Continued Owners Address 503 OLD KITCHEN RD Owners Address Continued WHITE POST VA ZIP 22663 Acreage 0 Zoning RP Total Improvments 0 Total Land Value 50000 Total Property Value 50000 Physical House Number 0 Physical Street Name Deed Book Number Deed Book Page Number 0 Instrument Year 2006 Instrument Number 182 Building Sq Ft 0 Month Last Sold 8 Day Last Sold 4 Year Last Sold 2006 Selling Price 0 Gal Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L 1 • http://gis.co.frederick.va.usIFreeancelClientIPublicAccessllprintFrame.html 4/l/2008 V iewDetail 0 Page I of] Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail • 2008 REAL ESTATE TAXES Department# : RE2008 Ticket #: 228110001 FRQ:f1 Sup#: P Name: LOVE SANDRA Account#: 20887„ Name 2: Map#: 65A 2 1 Address: 503 OLD KITCHEN RD Description: GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L1 S1 WHITE POST VA 22663 Bill Date: 06/04/2008 Due Date: 06/05/2008 Land: $50.000 Original Bill:F $131.25 Penalty Paid:r Amount Owed:F� "Total Owed: F.� ... . Improve: Payments: Int Paid: Other: Penalty: Use: Acres: I' 0.00 Last Date: 05/30/2008 Interest: ._.._ ..__-. __ ___......._. Note that if payment has been received Nvithin the last 10 business days, any returned items may not be posted at this time. Please check the website again. • 0) [?aic C}'pe Transaction # Amount 13alance 6/5/2008 Charge 0 $131.25 $131.25 5/30/2008 Payment 15678 ($131.25) $0.00 I Use the print key for your urovvser to print a copy of taxes pale ivi' +h— J . New, Search Previous': iittl)s://www.co.frederick.va.us/applications/REPubliclnquiry/ViewDetal1.aspx 7/3/2008 0 • Page 1 of 1 Camra Database &cel ID Number 65A 2 1 2 Ord Number 0020869 hers Name MASON KENNETII L. & SHIRLEY A. Owners Name Continued Owners Address 1930 SENSENY RD Owners Address Continued WINCHESTER VA ZIP 22602 Acreage 0 Zoning RP Total Improvments 80000 Total Land Value 54500 Total Property Value 134500 Physical House Number 1930 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number 299 Deed Book Page Number 174 Instrument Year 0 Instrument Number 0 Building Sq Ft 1149 Month Last Sold 0 Day Last Sold 0 Year Last Sold 0 Selling Price 0 al Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L2 •i http://gis.co.frederick.va.us/Freeance/Client/PublicAccess 1 /printFrame.html 4/l /2008 ViewDetail 0 • Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail . 2008 REAL ESTATE TAXES Department# : RE2008. Ticket #: 1 24.0760001: FRQ:f 1 Sup#: 0 Name: MASON KENNETH L. & SHIRLEY A. Account#: 20869 Name 2: Map#: 65A 2 1 2 Address: 11930 SENSENY RD Description: IGREENWOOD HEIGHTS L2 S1 WINCHESTER VA 22602 F Bill Date: 06/04/2008 Due Date: 06/05/2008 Land: $54,500 Original Bill: $353.07 Penalty Paid: Amount Owed: Total Owed: Improve: $.80,000 Use: Payments: $353.07- Acres: Int Paid: Other: Last Date: Penalty: Interest: 1�0.00 06/l 0/2008 Note that if payment has been received within the last 10 business days, any rcttn-ncd items may not be posted a this time. Please check the vvebsite al-ain. • €}ate Type Transaction ft Amount Bahince 6/5/2008 Charge 0 $353.07 $353.07 6!10/2008 Payment 57350 (S353.07) S0.00 1 USe the print ]key for your browser to print a cony of tales paid for this year. New Search Previous Page I of I littiDs://www.co.frederick.va.us/applications/RE PublicInquiryNiewDetail.aspx 7/3/2008 0 Page I of 1 Camra Database cel ID Number ,rd Number Owners Name Owners Name Continued Owners Address Owners Address Continued ZIP Acreage Zoning Total Improvments Total Land Value Total Property Value Physical House Number Physical Street Nance Deed Book Number Deed Book Page Number Instrument Year Instrument Number Building Sq Ft Month Last Sold Day Last Sold Year Last Sold Selling Price 4gal Description 0, 65A 2 1 3 0020870 MASON KENNETII L 1930 SENSENY RD WINCIIESTER VA 22602 0 RP 0 50000 50000 0 & SHIRLEY A. 451 807 0 0 0 0 0 0 2000 GREENWOOD HEIGI-ITS L3 littp://gis.co.frederick.va.us/Freeance/Client/PublicAccessI/printFrame.html 4/l/2008 ViewDetail 0 0 Page I of I Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail. • 2008 REAL ESTATE TAXES Department# : RE2008 Ticket #: 240770001 FRQ:FSup#: Name: MASON KENNETH L. & SHIRLEY A Account#: F20870 Name 2: Map##; 65A 2 1 3 Address: F93P SENSENY RD Description: GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L3 S1 WINCHESTER VA Bill Date: 06/04/2008 Land: $50.000 Original Bill: $131.25 Penalty 1'aid:F Amount O«red:���-.. . "Total Owed: F .. 22602 Due Date: 06/05/2008 Improve: 1 _ __ . Use: Payments: F $131.25- Acres: 0.00 Int Paid: Other: Last Date: 06/10/12008 ............ Penalty: Interest: _ Note that if payment has been received within the last 10 business days, any returned items may not be posted at this time Please Check the webslte a(yain. • .- Date Type Transactio❑ 4 Balance 6,'5/2008 Char(Te 0 $131.25 $131.25 6/ 10/2008 Payment 57350 (S 131.25) $0.00 1 d Tom., !-7:� :,� l: nzr #r::• zrn:nr )l�r•:es�SPl• }'!! uSe ILS. 'J1 flab a��., ava ,vv. .v. .. .. .+-.• -.. ,New Search + a enny of taxes paid for this year, Previous https://www.co.frederick.va.us/applications/REPublicInquiryNiewDetail.aspx 7/3/2M 0 . Page 1 of 1 Carnra Database ID Number 65A 2 1 4 Wel ,rd Number 0020871 Owners Name ANDERSON FRANKLIN B Owners Name Continued Owners Address 1948 SENSENY RD Owners Address Continued WINCIIESTER VA GIP 22602 Acreage 0 zoning RP Total Improvments 104200 Total Land Value 54500 Total Property Value 158700 Physical House Number 1948 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number 953 Deed Book Page Number 928 Instrument Year 0 I11strUrnent Number 0 Building Sq Ft 1200 Month Last Sold 12 Day Last Sold 2 Year Last Sold 1999 Selling Price 0 Jal Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L4 http://gis.co.frederick.va.us/Freeance/Client/PublicAccess 1/PrintFrame.html 4/l /2008 ViewDetail 0 0 Page I of' I Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail • 2008 REAL ESTATE TAXES DepartinciAg: [iiE-008 Ticket 4: 773.00.01 FRQ:F supit: F0 Name: --- FRANKLIN B Accountg: 20871 Name 2: F- Mapg: 65—A-214 Address: 1948 SENSENY RD Description: GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L4S1 . ........... WINCHESTER VA [iT69-2 Bill Date: 106104/2008 Due Date: 06/0,5,/12008 -1 .. .. ...... .... . ..... .......... I ... . ........ . . ............. .. . . ......... Land: $54,500 Improve: $104,200 Use: Original Bill:[ —$416.59 Payments: $416.59- Acres: F- 0.00 Penalty Paid: Amount Owed:F Int Paid: Other: Last Date: F--05 F3O/2008 Total Owed: Penalty: F Interest: Note that il'paynicnt has been i-eceived within the last 10 business days, any I-CtUnied items may not be posted at this iiine. Please check the website again. Da t C "hype TI.,111sildion it' Amount finkince 6/5/2008 Charge 0 $416.59 $416.59 5/30/2008 Payment 13973 ($416.59) S0.00 se the print key for your DFO-w Selz to IM-111L. it New Search 0, -C V1 LUAU3 4--1 -,-- .IJ—ILA —.— IU 1VX LIX10 Ly4-A - Previous littiis://www.co.frederick.va.uslapl)licationsIREPubliclnquiryNiewDetail.aspx 7/3/2008 i 0 Page 1 of 1 Camra Database Number 65A 2 1 5 te�,�ID C,Number 0020872 Owners Name STRAUSS DONALD E Owners Name Continued Owners Address 1958 SENSENY RD Owners Address Continued WINCHESTER VA ZIP 22602 Acreage 0 Zoning RP Total Improvments 119100 Total Land Value 54500 Total Property Value 173600 Physical House Number 1958 Physical Street Name SENSENY RD Deed Book Number 972 Deed Book Page Number 754 Instrument Year 0 Instrument Number 8060 Building Sq Ft 1508 Month Last Sold 8 Day Last Sold 1 Year Last Sold 2000 Selling Price 95000 Gal Description GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L5 http://gis.co.frederick.va.us/Frepance/Client/PublicAccess 1/printFrame.html 4/l/2008 ViewDetail 6 Page 1 of* 1 Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail • 2008 REAL ESTATE TAXES Department# : RE2008 Ticket #: 364430001. FRQ:FSup#: 0 Name; STRAUSS DONALD E _..... ...._ _..__` Account#: 20872 Name 2: 1 Map#: [65A 2 1 5 Address: 1958 SENSENY RD Description: GREENWOOD HEIGHTS L5 S1 WINCHESTER VA Bill Date: 06/04/2008 Due Date: 06/05/2008 Land: $54,500 Improve: $119,100 , Use: Original Bill: $455.70 Payments: $455.70- Acres: 0.00 Penalty Paid: Int Paid: Amount Owed: Other: Last Date: 05/30/2008 "Total Owed: Penalty: Interest: ---------------....._---------- -------- ------- ---- -- -- -- Note th<lt It p7iymcjlt Ims been received — ---- -- — - ---- within the last 10 business days, anV I-Ctlll'ned Items may [lot be posted ,it this time. 1}luse check the Svebsite a.,aln. • 0— D'Ite Type frillisite.tion i" Amount t ahince 6/5/2003 Charge 0 $455.70 $455.70 5/30/2005 Payment 13971 ($455.70) $0.00 1 YT-- LL-. �� I. s L. + �! - of +--- ---:Cl fn: }hic :7: ^.`J IUNU LLLG pI III B,ej' 1VI 'y'VUI L7rVVVOaI w priia. iL :, JYJ — ".— lea. j...... II New Search Previous ]iops://www.co.frederick.va.us/applications/RFPubIiclnquiry/ViewDetai1.aspx 7/3/2008 11 C] AMENDMENT on 7j1�10'ID Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 7, 2009 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 28, 2009 1@ APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING #13-08 OF 1932 - 1958 SENSENY ROAD PHARMACY WHEREAS, Rezoning #13-08 of 1932 - 1958 Senseny Road Pharmacy, submitted by Painter -Lewis, PLC, to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District, with proffers dated July 2, 2008 with last revision date of January 21, 2009, for a Commercial Project that may include a Pharmacy, was considered. The properties are located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road (Route 665) and Greenwood Road (Route 656), in the Red Bud Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers-55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, and 65A-2-1-5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 7, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 28, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District for a Commercial Project that may included a Pharmacy, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRES#03-09 This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 28th day of January, 2009 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Gary W. Dove Gene E. Fisher Philip A. Lemieux ?DKDS403-09 Gary A. Lofton Aye Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye y Aye Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. y Aye A COPY ATTEST v i ALrX- mom, John R: R-A y, Jr. Frederick County Administrator 1932- 958 Senseny Road Proffer Statement Rezoning #: Property: 3.93 acres PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Recorded Owner: Sandra Love, Power of Attorney, Kenneth L. & Shirley B. Mason, Franklin B. Anderson, Donald E. Strauss Applicant: Mr. David Ervin Ervin Development Corporation 1830 Plaza Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name: Original Date of Proffers: Revision Date(s): Ervin Development Corporation 1932-1958 Senseny Road July 2, 2008 October 2, 2008 December 22, 2008 January 21, 2009 Prepared by: PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel.: (540) 662-5792 email: office@painterlewis.com Job Number: 00803015 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, the undersigned applicant proffers that in the event that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County shall approve Rezoning Application # I3 - 0�,' for the rezoning of parcels TM#'s 55-A-196, 65A-2-1,65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 from RP to B2, the use and development of the subject property shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions set forth in this proffer except to the extent that such conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such are approved by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the Code of Virginia and the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. These proffers shall be binding on the owner and their legal successors or assigns. PRnFFFRR 1.) Generalized Development Plan The applicant agrees to proffer the Generalized Development Plan (GDP) dated 10/02/08, identified as "1932-1958 Senseny Road" and which is attached to the proffer statement, for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of the proposed commercial development, the location and form of the site access, the location of the proposed pharmacy, the location of a monument to the Greenwood School, the approximate location of interparcel access easements, and construction improvements to Route 657 and Route 656. Please refer to the attached drawing named "GDP". 2.) Improvements to Route 657 and Route 656 The applicant will make the necessary road frontage improvements, as required by the Virginia Department of Transportation, to Route 657 (Senseny Road) and Route 656 (Greenwood Road) in support of the proposed development. The improvements will be designed and submitted for approval to the Virginia Department of Transportation and Frederick County during the site plan review process. The improvements will include: a) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 657. The dedication will include approximately 7' parallel to the existing right of way along the full frontage of the site to provide a total right of way width of 80'; b) The design and construction of a right turn/ through lane eastbound on Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; c) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 656. The dedication will include approximately 3,300 square feet sufficient for the installation of additional lanes on Route 656 along the frontage of the site. d) The design and construction of a through lane and right turn lane northbound on Route 656 at its intersection with Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; e) The design and construction of a full access commercial entrance aligning with the existing entrance to Orrick Commons and the required alterations to the existing traffic signal as required by VDOT. f) The design and construction of a right-in/right-out commercial entrance on Greenwood Road. g) The design and construction of a right -in only commercial entrance on Senseny Road. page 2 PROFFER STATEMEN i PARCEL I D's: 55 A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 a cl 3.) Monetary Contribution to Frederick County Service Organizations The applicant will donate or will cause to be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County =� for the benefit of the Greenwood Community Fire and Rescue Company the sum of $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services. This sum will be paid upon the receipt of the first building permit issued for the site, subsequent to the approval of this rezoning. 4.) Maximum Floor Area The applicant agrees to limit the gross commercial floor area that will be built on the 3.93 acres to 30,000 square feet. The amount of commercial area to be built will be determined through the site plan review process. 5.) Design Features The applicant agrees to construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk running parallel with Route 657 and Route 656. The sidewalk will be maintained by the property owner(s). The sidewalk will be completed prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 6.) Monetary Contributions The applicant agrees to provide $25,000.00, for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 rights -of -way. This sum will be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 7.) Historical Monument The applicant agrees to construct a monument on the site commemorating the Greenwood School prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site. The monument will be constructed of materials from the original Greenwood School and generally conform to the sketch shown on the attached drawing titled "Greenwood School Monument" and dated April 13, 2007. The approximate location of the monument is shown on the Generalized Development Plan. The maintenance and upkeep of the monument will be the responsibility of the property owner. 8.) Building Design The proposed buildings shall be constructed using compatible architectural styles and materials. Design elements shall be compatible with Frederick County and will respect the continuity and character of the existing architectural fabric of the surrounding community. The principal facade in addition to any fagade fronting Senseny Road and/or Greenwood Road shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco, or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. Metal panels shall be prohibited as a construction material for buildings. page 3 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I D's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 9.) Inter -parcel Circulation and Access The applicant agrees to provide access easements which will permit access through the site from all points of right of way access throughout the site and to adjacent parcels to allow for future redevelopment on the properties to the east and south of this parcel. The easements will be defined during the site plan process and recorded by the applicant upon approval by Frederick County. Prior to the occupancy of any structure on the site, the applicant will cause to construct drive aisles as necessary to provide access from any such structure to and from the traffic signal at the full commercial entrance on Senseny Road. 10.) Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road The applicant recognizes that the ultimate width of Senseny Road at the intersection with Greenwood Road will be approximately 100 feet from the south side to the north side. The safe passage of pedestrians across Senseny Road is necessary and desirable. The applicant agrees to install pedestrian visual signals and controls, striping, and raised refuge islands as required to aid in the crossing of Senseny Road. These improvements will be installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site and only in accordance with, and with the approval of, the Virginia Department of Transportation. 11.) Parcel Usage The applicant agrees to construct a pharmacy containing approximately 13,225 square feet and associated improvements on the southeast corner of the intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road as generally shown on the GDP. The applicant also agrees to prohibit the use of a Car Wash, SIC 7542, on the property. page 4 0 0 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL IUs: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 The conditions proffered above shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in the interest of the owner. In the even that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grant this rezoning and accepts these proffers, then these proffers shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to the other requirements of the Frederick County Code. Submitted By: Sandra Love, Power of Attorney City/Gottnty of \A) Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 Notaroublic _BEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Registration number: t' �a Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires / c� My commission expires: a 3/ 11 CD r i page 5 0 0 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL IUs: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 r Kenneth L. Mason City/Get-inty of VJ Ijnzy?ot7� Commonwealtp Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �day of C_!� na c 200 Notar Iublic �j Notary Registration number: My commission expires: Shirley B. Mad n JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. ## 7010302 My Commission Expires O 3i1p City/&&uiq#y of `nr� [r, of Commonwealt, Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ::�)— 04 y, ... , 200 / Notarv/Public Notary Registration number: My commission expires: / a �� page 6 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. ## 7010302 My Commission Expires �l�/ ,10 0 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Franklin B. Anderson City/C—eunl—y of Commonweal Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this,_ day of 200 J JEAN L. EBACK Not(a Publi � Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 Notary Registration number: MY Commission Expires 3< o My commission expires: /O 3lu i page 7 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL 1 Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 /LL Donald E. Strau, s-'- City/G-"nly of �A- n rh. , tiA— Commonweaith Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged mac' 1200 Notay� Public before me this (�,q`Ycfj day of Notary Registration number: -� Ca I jCa� My commission expires: 1 CJ s 1. 6 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virc;inia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires u 0 0 DATE '�. NO. 3934 RECEIVED FROM ' '- '� .�__ t.. J ? ' �Y ) 4 ;te ADDRESS a ! 1 DOLLARS $ Cl FOR RENT T. ❑FOR AMT. OF ACCOUNT ; CASH AMT. PAID CHECK BALANCE DUE ORDER +% BY _i �JEM X LLC PO BOX 3538 95 GASTONIA, NC 28054 1 100 531 DATE Z - Z -- PAY + TO THE ORDER OF �t o ev c rus DOLLARS F. BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY 1-•DBAW BBT BffrA=n FOR C� • 1180000 10 9 5118 is 5 3 10 1 1 2 11:000 5 10 3 4 6 9 48 311• JEM X LLC PO BOX 3538 GASTONIA, NC 28054 1096 88-112/531 PAY DATE TO THE ORDER OF DOLLARS 8 F....... BANKINGI AND TRUST COWANY BRANCH FOR u■0000109611' 1:0531011211: 000510346948311 00 0 Lc a 2 0 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS [ • t I ❑FOR RENT ❑FOR _ DATE/1 NO. 3953 K rtdw4 • • • AMT. OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT. PAID L. CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER _LARS $ t WE 0 -,F)w c () �) -Z Ic, t 10 2 Fj JEM X LLC PO BOX 3538 GASTONLA, NC 28054 PAY TO THE ORDER OF DATE NO. 39 3 4 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS A' DOLLARS LJFCR RENT QFCR '7-; j) oloills� Qmm AMT. I ACCOUNT CASH AMT. PAID CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER (2 BY L 1 Q 1095 66,112/531 DATE Z Z -k(n $ DOLLARS m BRANCH RANKING AND MUST COMPANY 1-800-HAW WT WT� FOR C�,,,, ' "- - C., - I'00000109s'71.-�S310�112�ll.-�OOOSIO31..694i3311I I AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: January 7, 2009 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: January 28, 2009 1@ APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING 913-08 OF 1932 - 1958 SENSENY ROAD PHARMACY WHEREAS, Rezoning #13-08 of 1932 - 1958 Senseny Road Pharmacy, submitted by Painter -Lewis, PLC, to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District, with proffers dated July 2, 2008 with last revision date of January 21, 2009, for a Commercial Project that may include a Pharmacy, was considered. The properties are located in the southeastern quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road (Route 665) and Greenwood Road (Route 656), in the Red Bud Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, and 65A-2-1-5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 7, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on January 28, 2009; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District for a Commercial Project that may included a Pharmacy, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRES903-09 This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 28th day of January, 2009 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Gary W. Dove Gene E. Fisher Philip A. Lemieux ?DRES403-09 Gary A. Lofton _Aye Aye Bill M. Ewing - Aye y A Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. e y Aye A COPS' ATTEST ` Johm R: R& J- r. Frederick County Administrator 0 0 1932- :958 5enseny Road Proffer Statement Rezoning #: Property: 3.93 acres PARCEL Us: 55-A-196, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Recorded Owner: Sandra Love, Power of Attorney, Kenneth L. & Shirley B. Mason, Franklin B. Anderson, Donald E. Strauss Applicant: Mr. David Ervin Ervin Development Corporation 1830 Plaza Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Project Name: Original Date of Proffers: Revision Date(s): Ervin Development Corporation 1932-1958 Senseny Road July 2, 2008 October 2, 2008 December 22, 2008 January 21, 2009 Prepared by: PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 Tel.: (540) 662-5792 email: office@painterlewis.com Job Number: 00803015 PROFFER STATEMENTro 0 PARR' EL I Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, the undersigned applicant proffers that in the event that the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County shall approve Rezoning Application # 13 - D9' for the rezoning of parcels TM#'s 55-A-196, 65A-2-1,65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 from RP to B2, the use and development of the subject property shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions set forth in this proffer except to the extent that such conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by the applicant and such are approved by the Board of Supervisors in accordance with the Code of Virginia and the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. These proffers shall be binding on the owner and their legal successors or assigns. PROFFERS 1.) Generalized Development Plan The applicant agrees to proffer the Generalized Development Plan (GDP) dated 10/02/08, identified as "1932-1958 Senseny Road" and which is attached to the proffer statement, for the purpose of identifying the general configuration of the proposed commercial development, the location and form of the site access, the location of the proposed pharmacy, the location of a monument to the Greenwood School, the approximate location of interparcel access easements, and construction improvements to Route 657 and Route 656. Please refer to the attached drawing named "GDP". 2.) Improvements to Route 657 and Route 656 The applicant will make the necessary road frontage improvements, as required by the Virginia Department of Transportation, to Route 657 (Senseny Road) and Route 656 (Greenwood Road) in support of the proposed development. The improvements will be designed and submitted for approval to the Virginia Department of Transportation and Frederick County during the site plan review process. The improvements will include: a) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 657. The dedication will include approximately 7' parallel to the existing right of way along the full frontage of the site to provide a total right of way width of 80'; b) The design and construction of a right turn/ through lane eastbound on Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; c) The dedication of land for the expansion of Route 656. The dedication will include approximately 3,300 square feet sufficient for the installation of additional lanes on Route 656 along the frontage of the site. d) The design and construction of a through lane and right turn lane northbound on Route 656 at its intersection with Route 657 and a raised median to prevent left turns from the site as required by VDOT; e) The design and construction of a full access commercial entrance aligning with the existing entrance to Orrick Commons and the required alterations to the existing traffic signal as required by VDOT. f) The design and construction of a right-in/right-out commercial entrance on Greenwood Road. g) The design and construction of a right -in only commercial entrance on Senseny Road. page 2 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 3.) Monetary Contribution to Frederick County Service Organizations The applicant will donate or will cause to be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County for the benefit of the Greenwood Community Fire and Rescue Company the sum of $5,000.00 for impacts to fire and rescue services. This sum will be paid upon the receipt of the first building permit issued for the site, subsequent to the approval of this rezoning. 4.) Maximum Floor Area The applicant agrees to limit the cgross commercial floor area that will be built on the 3.93 acres to 30,000 square feet. The amount of commercial area to be built will be determined through the site plan review process. 5.) Design Features The applicant agrees to construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk running parallel with Route 657 and Route 656. The sidewalk will be maintained by the property owner(s). The sidewalk will be completed prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 6.) Monetary Contributions The applicant agrees to provide $25,000.00, for future transportation improvements within the Route 657 and Route 656 rights -of -way. This sum will be paid to the Treasurer of Frederick County prior to the occupancy of any structure on the property. 7.) Historical Monument The applicant agrees to construct a monument on the site commemorating the Greenwood School prior.to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site. The monument will be constructed of materials from the original Greenwood School and generally conform to the sketch shown on the attached drawing titled "Greenwood School Monument" and dated April 13, 2007. The approximate location of the monument is shown on the Generalized Development Plan. The maintenance and upkeep of the monument will be the responsibility of the property owner. 8.) Building Design The proposed buildings shall be constructed using compatible architectural styles and materials. Design elements shall be compatible with Frederick County and will respect the continuity and character of the existing architectural fabric of the surrounding community. The principal facade in addition to any fapade fronting Senseny Road and/or Greenwood Road shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco, or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. Metal panels shall be prohibited as a construction material for buildings. page 3 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL I D's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 9.) Inter -parcel Circuiation and Access The applicant agrees to provide access easements which will permit access through the site from all points of right of way access throughout the site and to adjacent parcels to allow for future redevelopment on the properties to the east and south of this parcel. The easements will be defined during the site plan process and recorded by the applicant upon approval by Frederick County. Prior to the occupancy of any structure on the site, the applicant will cause to construct drive aisles as necessary to provide access from any such structure to and from the traffic signal at the full commercial entrance on Senseny Road. 10.) Pedestrian Crossing of Senseny Road The applicant recognizes that the ultimate width of Senseny Road at the intersection with Greenwood Road will be approximately 100 feet from the south side to the north side. The safe passage of pedestrians across Senseny Road is necessary and desirable. The applicant agrees to install pedestrian visual signals and controls, striping, and raised refuge islands as required to aid in the crossing of Senseny Road. These improvements will be installed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy for any building on the site and only in accordance with, and with the approval of, the Virginia Department of Transportation. 11.) Parcel Usage The applicant agrees to construct a pharmacy containing approximately 13,225 square feet and associated improvements on the southeast corner of the intersection of Senseny Road and Greenwood Road as generally shown on the GDP. The applicant also agrees to prohibit the use of a Car Wash, SIC 7542, on the property. page 4 PROFFER STATEMENP 0 PARCEL I D's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 The conditions proffered above shall be binding on the heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in the interest of the owner. In the even that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grant this rezoning and accepts these proffers, then these proffers shall apply to the land rezoned in addition to the other requirements of the Frederick County Code. Submitted By: OKI, Sandra Love, Power of Attorney City/Gatrnty of W � � , Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 Notar&ublic JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Notary Registration number: �b owo�- Reg. #7010302 My Commission Expires. b � � My commission expires: 16 3/ �() i / page 5 0 0 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL IUs: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Kenneth L. Mason 7 City/g,aunty of \ In f Commonweal Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of Q-yt-s,cc=� , 200 Notary/qublic Notary Registration number: % olo,3o�)- My commission expires: its ,?� i 6 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires D 3,I ip Shirley B. Mad n City/C-e ftty of � f � Q�►� Commonwealt Of Virginia. st acknowledged before me this day of The foregoing instrument was acknowl g � Y Notary Registration number: 2n/(%�b� My commission expires: G 0hi / o page 6 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires /v Jam/ l0 PROFFER STATEMENT PARCEL ID's: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Franklin B. Anderson City/Gla-Unity of VI t, r lam` Commonwealth Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged 200 L— Notaj Publi Notary Registration number: My commission expires: / v 3 i before me this �day of page 7 JEAN L. EBACK Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires PROFFER STATEMENP to PARCEL 1Us: 55-A-196; 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4, 65A-2-1-5 Donald E. Strau--' City/Ce- my of )A-1;,, f. yj_ Commonwealth� Of Virginia. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 200 ? �3 JEAN L. EBACK Notayr Publi c Notary Public Notary Registration number: jC]� My commission expires: 1 Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. # 7010302 My Commission Expires 6 I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: February 18, 2009 The amount of $50.00 was deposited in -line item #3-010-019110-0008 for the company named below had a deposit for one sign for Rezoning 913-08 for 1932-1953 Senseny Road. The company has returned the sign and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. Please send a check.in_the.amount.of $50.00 to: Painter & Lewis 817 Cedar Creek Grade Suite 120 Winchester, VA 22601 RSA/pd 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Y 4 t n 12\ 6� OA D2..i + _ DATE �t� o$ No. 0678 RECEIVED FROM EAA IL� c, ADDRESS 186c01,�L 1 �1 �, V L 1 � 110 l' v Op cn N rc.e na .,C� fNu� DOLLARS $ f l3 N ❑FOR REN (� U y Q ❑FOR �►ti. i 15 U O Q > c� to wa�3� AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH AMT. PAID t 13 ..i CHECKImomer- O BY y" �1�1 PLEASE DETACH AND RETAIN THIS STATEMENT AS YOUR RECORD OF PAYMENT. Thank You 519785 38453 inn nn 0.00 300.00 T A X R E C E I P T 2REDERICK COUNTY C. WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR P.O. BOX 225 i WINCHESTER VA 22604-0225 SIGN DEPOSITS PLANNING DEPT OF PLANNING Ticket #:00006170001 Date : 12/02/2008 Register: CJO/CJOS1 Trans. #: 63506 Dept # 1095 Acct# Previous Balance $ 50.00 Principal Being Paid $ 50.00 Penalty $ .00 Interest $ .00 Amount Paid $ 50.00 *Balance Due $ .00 Pd by DEPT OF PLANNING Check 12143.00 # CKS BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PENALTY/INTEREST THRU THE MONTH 12/2008 • Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-662-5792 office (a)painter(ewis. corn January 27, 2009 Mr. Mike Ruddy Frederick County Planning Department 107 North Kent Street ! ;, Winchester, VA 22601 RE: 1932-1958 SENSENY ROAD REZONING APPLICATION Dear Mike, Enclosed, please find for final submittal, the following information for the rezoning application listed above: The revised, signed, and notarized Proffer Statement. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you would have any questions or need additional information. Sipcerely, Ji PFFri Engineering Admin, Assistant PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. Enclosure JOB NUMBER: 0803015 0 rw otxCL Ite A4 PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. CONSULTING ENGINEERS tel.: (540)662-5792 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 fax.: (540)662-5793 Winchester, VA 22601 email: office@painterlewis.com January 6, 2009 Ms. Kathy Kerns 918 Greenwood Road Winchester, VA 22602 RE: LANDSCAPE SCREEN AGREEMENT Dear Ms. Kerns: Attached, you will find an exhibit titled "Kerns Landscape Screen", dated 1/22/08. Your sug- gestion that the screen be installed only after an evaluation of the impact from headlight glare from the proposed commercial development across Greenwood Road is a good idea. In the event that this rezoning is approved and the project moves forward, I will put a note on the site plan for the commercial development that provides you the means to have the screen in- stalled upon your request. This request must be made within 12 months of the date of the opening of the store. The placement of the screen will be far enough away from the site sewer line to avoid any problems with the plants' root systems growing into the sewer line. The installation of the screen will not interfere with the existing site flower garden in place- ment or during the planting of the screen. The height of the plants will be determined if and when the need for the screen arises. The type of plants specified for the screen will be ap- proved by the property owner, that is, Ms. Kerns. If this agreement is acceptable to you, please sign in the appropriate location and initial the attached exhibit. I have included two copies of this letter so that you may keep one for your files. I will provide a signed copy to Frederick County Department of Planning and Zoning for their permanent file. Ms. Kathy Kerns Date Thank you fo our help in this matter. Joh�X-C. iYs,P. 4E. At" tachment Job No.: 0803015 Page 1 PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. 0 a November 26, 2008 Mr. Mike Ruddy Frederick County Planning Department 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: 1932-1958 SENSENY ROAD REZONING APPLICATION Dear Mike, Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Suite 120 Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-662-5792 office anpainterlewis.com Enclosed, please find for final submittal, the following information for the rezoning application listed above: • A Rezoning Application signed by the applicant and owner. • A Special Limited Power of Attorney (4) signed by the owners and notarized. • A signed and notarized version of the Proffer Statement • A fee check, in the amount of $10,393.00. • Agency comment/approval forms. • A check, in the amount of $50, for the sign deposit. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you would have any questions or need additional information. Ji I rie Engineering Admin. Assistant PAINTER-LEWIS, P.L.C. Enclosure JOB NUMBER: 0803015 01-22-2009 /93e� -/938 j�g,,,g--..r ,p- dn/ 0:0, 1 V a (2-4-2Oyu c�Tj 0 s COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX:540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING December 5, 200 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #12-08 FOR WALGREENS-DAIRY CORNER PLACE On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, December 17, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 912-08 of Walgreens-Dairy Corner Place, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 3.1 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to B2 (General Business) District with proffers, for commercial uses. The properties are located at the southeastern corner of the intersection of Berryville Pike (Route 7) and Valley Mill Road (Route 659), adjacent to Dairy Corner Place, in the Red Bud Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 54F-1-9, 54F-1-9A, 54F-A-30, 54F-3-A, 54F-3-Al and 54F-3-A2. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend the public hearing. A copy of the applications will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Planning Director MTR/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify th t � e correspondence attached �� mailed to the following on �a �S © from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia —' 54F - 1- • 7- 54F . 1• . 9-A SORTO ARIOSTO ELGIN & MARIA E EASTSIDE HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 31 1 COUNTRY CLUB DR SW WINCHESTER VA 22604 LEESBURG VA 20175.4307 Patton Harris Rust Associates, PC 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 54 - A- - 112.0 BURNS DAVID M BURNS SVETLANA N 1675 FORT BRADDOCK CT WINCHESTER VA 22601.2851 54 - A- -112-C 220 SEAFOOD RESTAURANT L L C 238 HANGING TREE RD WINCHESTER VA 22603.3401 54 - A- - 99-E WIN LLC 1100 FIFTH AVE S STE 210 NAPLES FL 34102-6407 54 - A- - 114- FREDERICK COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD PO BOX 3508 WINCHESTER VA 22604.2546 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK 54F - A- - 30-A STATE HIGHWAY AND PO BOX 2249 STAUNTON VA 24402.2249 54F - 1- - 8- SHOEMAKER WILLIE & ANGELA 286 HUNTERSRIDGE RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.6801 54F - 1- - 6- GARRETT BETTY D 147 DOWELL J CIR WINCHESTER VA 22602.6182 City of Winchester, Planning Department Mr. Tim Youmans Rouss City Hall Winchester, VA 22601 Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director Frederick County Planning Department I, �% _ O`.� e , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do reby certify that M'c ael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director for the Department of Planning d Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated / � Planning 7d K , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this 6 is day of XJ Zdad" My commission expires on BEVERLY H, _ � ID # 3 NOW3Y 51878 .. NOTARY PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA NOTARYI UBLIC MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES JULY31,2011 Adjoining Property Owyers 1, V �� Rezoning Ci`" TO:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the ] FROM:BEV - Planning Dept. of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, ; Pleaseri It O sets oTHANKSbY abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any / right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2"d floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name Address Property Identification Number (PIN) Name: David and Svetlana Burns 1675 Fort Braddock Street Property #: 54-A-112Q 54-A-112D AND 54-A-112P Winchester, VA 22601 Name: 220 Seafood Restaurant, LLC 238 Hanging Tree Road Property #: 54-A-112C Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Win, LLC 1100 Fifth Ave S, Ste 210 Property #: 54-A-99E ' Naples, FL 34102 Name: Frederick County School Board PO Box 3508 Property #: 54-A-114 Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Ariosto and Maria Sorto 1 Country Club Drive Property #: 54F-1-7—, 54F-1-3 and 54f-1-5 Leesburg, VA 20175 Name: State Highway PO Box 2249 Property #: 54F-A-30A , Staunton, VA 24402 Name: Willie and Angela Shoemaker 286 Huntersridge Drive Property #: 54F-1-8 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Betty Garrett 147 Dowell J. Circle Property #: 54F-1-6 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: 14aLb/YJ{,�S Lam° Tk,A- Vfi i 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING January 14, 2009 TO: THE APPL ICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZIONING APPLICATION #13-08 FOR 1932-1958 SENSE NY ROAD On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, January 28, 2009, at 7:15 p.m: in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia io consider the following application: Rezoning 413-08 of 1932-1958 Senseny Road, submitted by Painter -Lewis,. P.L.C., to rezone 3.93 acres from RP (Residemiai Performance) District to B2 (Gecierai ;usiness) District with proffers, for a Commercial Project that may include.a Pharmacy. The pope ties are located in the southeaster: quadrant of the intersection at Senseny Road. (Route 657) and OteenAvo6d Road (Route 656) hi the Red Bud Magisterial District, and are identified by Property idea fication Numbers 55-A-196. 65,1-2-t; 65A-2-1-2, 65A-2-1-3, 65A-2-1-4 and 65A-2-1-5. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend the public hearing. A copy of. the applications will be available for review at the Handley Lib.z ary a.nd tie Bowman L,ibrar y the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street. in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. Yoi, can also visit us on the web at: Nvwiv. co. frederi ck. va.u.s. Sincerely. i� Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Plam- ing Director MTR/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to czrtify that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on i ( I -t � o(-( from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 55 - A- - 197- 0.91A - L- - I - LOVESANDRA 503 OLD KITCHEN RD WHITE POST VA b5A - L- I- 3- MASON KENNETH L & SI 1930SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA 65A - 2. 1- 4- ANDERSON FRANKLIN B 1948SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA Franklin B. Anderson 1948 Senseny Rd. Winchester, VA 22602 65A - 2- 1. 5- STRAUSS DONALD E 1958SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.8911 55 - A- - 201- ORRICK CEMETERY COMPANY INC CIO R W BURKS ADMN 501 S BRADDOCK ST WINCHESTER VA 22601.4048 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK STAFFORD TIMOTHY V STAFFORD MARY MCHALE 8739 C ST CHESAPEAKE BEACH MD 20732.9235 55 - A- - 198- GREEN SEN LLC CIO GREENWOOD GROCERY 1893SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.8908 65A - 7- - 7- KERNS KATHY S 918 GREENWOOD RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.6574 65A - 3- - 39- SHIELDS ROBERT J & CAROLYN L 927 GREENWOOD RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.6576 65A - 3- - 44- GUM DAVID C JR & PAIGE E 3026 WOODSIDE RD CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1346 r Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Plannip6 Director Frederick County Planning Department I, ` �QJ1��s,j 5 Q 9 C(L� , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director for the Department of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated I 1 �f has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this �� day of 1) 00 My commission expires on NOTARY PUBLIC 65A - 2- 1. 6- DORGAN MICHAEL CHARLES• • & MARGARET JOAN 1968 SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.8911 65A - 3- - 46- CASEY CHARLES H 775 FOX DR WINCHESTER VA 22603.4268 65A - 3- - 48- RUSSELL ROBERT W & KRISTINA S 109 GREENWOOD AVE WINCHESTER VA 22602.6507 65A - 3- - 50- WHETZEL WILLIAM A SR & ANGELA L 111 GREENWOOD AVE WINCHESTER VA 22602.6507 65A - 3- - 52- GOCHENOUR JEFFREY R 113 GREENWOOD AVE WINCHESTER VA 22602.6507 55 - A- - 201-A ORRICK CEMETERY COMPANY INC CIO MCDONALDS USA ATTN #045-13 PO BOX 182571 COLUMBUS OH 43213 Painter -Lewis PLC 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Ste. 120 Winchester, VA 22601 • i COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING December 23, 2008 TO: '111E APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPEJF-;' ! Y O vJNrR(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #13-08 FOR. 1.932-19.58 SENISENY ROAD On behalf of the Frederick County Planning CoTninission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, January 7, 2009, at 7,00 p.m, .in. the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, `Winchester, Virginia to consider the following applicatioi?: Rezoning H13-08 of 1932-1958 Senseny Road, submitted by Painter -Lewis, P.—C., ?i, _z.i} l.c;3 acres from RP (Residential Performance) District to 132 (General Business) with proffers, for a Commercial Project that may include a .Pharniacv. The prope,-f,r-, :.re tocated in the southeastern quadrant of the intersec tion at Senseny Road (Route 657) aqJ "ti •en\•vood Road (Route 656) in the ltcd Bud Magisterial District, and are identified by Pr-;perty identi::cadon Numbers 55•-A-1.96, 65A-2-1, 65A-2-1-2. 65A-2-1-3, 65A-24-4 and Any inte -sted part e-� saving questions or wishing to speak. may atte?id the public hearing. A copy of the appli.--ai—ionl; will be available for review at the I-laridle.y Libr ny and the Bowman Library the TNeek of tli.:, .neeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street it Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on 4he web at: �vvv�N.co. fred� ric><. vas us. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy, AIC,P Deputy Planning Director MTR/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • e attached correspondence wa0mailed to the following on Thus is to certifytha the p o s�,, from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 197 I yb- NORA KITCHEN RD DST VA 22663 i- L- KENNETH L & SHIRLEY A NSENY RD STER VA 22602.8909 1- 4- ;ON FRANKLIN B NSENY RD .STER VA 22602-8911 65A - 2. 1- 5- STRAUSS DONALD E 1958 SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA Painter -Lewis PLC 817 Cedar Creek Grade, Ste. 120 Winchester, VA 22601 22602.8911 55 - A- - 201- ORRICK CEMETERY COMPANY INC CIO R W BURKS ADMN 501 S BRADDOCK ST WINCHESTER VA 22601-4048 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK 55 • A• - STAFFORD TIMOTHY V STAFFORD MARY MCHALE 8739 C ST CHESAPEAKE BEACH MD 20732.9235 55 - A- - 198- GREEN SEN LLC CIO GREENWOOD GROCERY 1893 SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.8908 55 - A- - 194- TCG MANAGEMENT LLC CIO VA PROPERTY GROUP INC 3050 VALLEY AVE STE 110 WINCHESTER VA 22601.2668 65A - 7- - 7- KERNS KATHY S 918 GREENWOOD RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.6574 Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director Frederick County Planning Department 1 a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do iAreby certify that Ml&hacl T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director for the Department of PlanninUa-70 Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated �, has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State a$d County aforesaid. Given under my hand this day of 2`10 My commission expires on AtY'UBLIC BEVY ER- l- DELLINGER NOTARY ID # 331878 NOTARY PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA [My COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY81,2011 65A - 3- - 39 0 SHIELDS ROBERT J & CAROLY I. 927 GREENWOOD RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.6576 65A - 3- - 44- GUM DAVID C JR & PAIGE E 3026 WOODSIDE RD CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1346 65A - 2- 1- 6- DORGAN MICHAEL CHARLES & MARGARET JOAN 1968 SENSENY RD WINCHESTER VA 22602.8911 65A - 3- - 46- CASEY CHARLES H 775 FOX DR WINCHESTER VA 22603-4268 65A - 3- - 48. RUSSELL ROBERT W & KRISTINA S 109 GREENWOOD AVE WINCHESTER VA 22602.6507 65A - 3- - 50- WHETZEL WILLIAM A SR & ANGELA L 111 GREENWOOD AVE WINCHESTER VA 22602.6507 65A - 3- - 52. GOCHENOUR JEFFREY R 113 GREENWOOD AVE WINCHESTER VA 22602.6507 55 -A- - 201-A ORRICK CEMETERY COMPANY INC CIO MCDONALDS USA ATTN #045.13 PO BOX 182571 COLUMBUS OH 43218 PC, z- /9 -o �/ 1932 -1958 Senseny Road Rezoning (/ TO:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING FROM: BEV - PI inning Dept. Please print sets of labels by � -THANKS! ierty Identification Number Address Name: Orrick Cemetery Company, Inc. 501 S. Braddock Street c/o R.W. Burks Admin. Winchester, VA 22601 Pro e # 55-A-201 Name: Orrick Cemetery Company, Inc. 501 S. Braddock Street c/o R.W. Burks Admin. Winchester, VA 22601 Property # 55-A-20B Name: Stafford, Timothy V. & Mary McHale 8705 C Street Property # 55-A-197 ✓ Chesapeake Beach, VA 20732 Name: Green Sen, LLC c/o Greenwood Grocery 1893 Senseny Road Property # 55-A-198 / Winchester, VA 22602 Name: TCG Management, LLC 847 Lake St. Clair Property # 55-A-194 '!/ Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Stafford Timothy V. & Mary McHale 8705 C Street Property # 65A-7-8 Chesapeake Beach, VA 20732 Name -Kerns, Kathy S. 918 Greenwood Road Property # 65A-7-7 ✓ Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Shields, Robert J. & Carolyn L. 927 Greenwood Road Property # 65A-3-39 ✓ Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Gum, David C. Jr. & Paige E. 3026 Woodside Road Property # 65A-3-44 Clearbrook, VA 22624 ivame:.Dorgan, Michael C.i - Se 1Qasz Convo wy Road Property # 65A-2-1-6 �`� Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Casey, Charles H. 775 Fox Drive Property # 65A-3-46 ✓ Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Russell, Robert W. & Kristina S. 109 Greenwood Avenue Property # 65A-3-48 ✓ Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Whetzel, William A. Sr. & Angela L. 111 Greenwood Avenue Property # 65A-3-50 Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Gochenour, Jeffrey R. 113 Greenwood Avenue Property # 65A-3-52 V' Winchester, VA 22602 ti A Zo I A �S A Zo I D 5 I MGgIIRIgj� !J BY: ----- �---------- 0 0 Property Owner - 1932 -1958 Senseny Road Rezoning Property Owner Name Address Name: Sandra Love 503 Old Kitchen Road White Post, VA 22663 Name: Kenneth & Shirley Mason 1930 Senseny Road Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Franklin B. Anderson 1948 Senseny Road Winchester, VA 22602 Name: Donald E. Straus 1958 Senseny Road Winchester, VA 22602 1,7 DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA w GIS, MAPPING, GRAPHICS WORK REQUEST S DATE RECEIVED: UESTED COMPLETION DATE: REQUESTING AGENT: Department, Agency, or Company: - Mailing and/or Billing Address: Telephone: E-mail Address: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (W: e"t>L_w_ �s Pros s Iq� A I-'�)J3f DIGITAL: PAPER:_ SIZES: COLOR: BLACK/) FAX: M additianaf"uiformation on nacx of rcquo�a) I FAX: _.NUMBER OF COPIES: STAFF MEMBER: HOURS REQUIRED: COMPLETION DATE: MATERIALS: DATE OF PICK-UPIDELIVERY: AMOUNT DUE: AMOUNT BILLED: METHOD OF PAYMENT: AMOUNT PAID: CHECK NON Frederick County GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-5651) OCT 2 4 2008 Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE P41TIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YO U WO ULD LIKE TO HA VE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME Candice Mark Dana Eric Mike John Amber COMMENTS: � r Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd io z Y k I 2610 i/LA <<�2 6/o