The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About062-90 Sager Real Estate - Backfilef SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The application is not complete if the following are not present: 1. 1 set of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan: OK' 12/ZCc'90 G.�,L2(4 VDOT Jlr City of Winchester f�o Lower+ 1'�ZI`�� Co. San. Auth . �� Co. Health Dept. OVAt- Inspections � Parks & Rec. A �%' Fire Marshall OJ Airport Authority 1, M(r_ Engineer 2. 1 copy of the SITE PLAN Application 31 913. 5 copies of the plan on a single sheet( FC'aP,%Z-C J 4. 1 reproducible copy of the plan (if required) 5. a 35mm. slide of the plan (if required) TRACKING DATE t, Application Received i2- Review/Invoice received from Engineer (U Fee Paid (amount $ ) Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required) Final Site Plan submitted with review agency, Planning Commission, and staff comments addressed. RECEIPT AMOUNT DUE AMOUNT PAID BALANCE DUE PAID BY rl CASH CHECK ❑ OTHER �.w FF Y DEPT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT P. U. E_1i; ks^? 'OURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINtA 22601 DATE RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS THE SUM OF _ - _. _ -_ — _ _ _ _ _ DOLLARS S BY DAYTIMERSRE-ORDER No. 3221 — Primed in USA S , COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/667-0370 March 15, 1991 Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd. Attn: Mr. David L. Bushman 129D South Main Street Woodstock, Virginia 22664 Dear Mr. Bushman: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan 1062-90 of Sager Real Estate on March 15, 1991. This plan calls for the construction of a 16,758 square foot real estate office, a paved parking lot complete with curb and gutter, a concrete ditch'stormwater release, 12 regular parking spaces, one handicapped parking space, a handicapped ramp, a four foot concrete sidewalk, three outdoor lighting fixtures, a 4' x 6' concrete pad with a privacy fence for trash containers, a 5' x 10' sign, and all required erosion and sediment control measures. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter, please contact me. Sincerely, &I Q- *— Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW/dds cc: Mr. Dudley H. Rinker, Opequon District Supervisor Mr. Don Sager, Sager Associated, Inc. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • � •. 5P�- oc�2-90 i ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS January 2, 1991 Mr. Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Sager Real Estate #17555.109 Dear Evan: We have completed the second review of the above -referenced site and find that all the comments have been addressed. We recommend approval as submitted. Sincerely, DONO UE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul A. B rnard, P.E. Project Manager PAB:mb Enclosure cc: Mr. David Bushman, P.E. Shenandoah Engineers, Ltd. T/L/ANO D C�C�C2G�C� JAN 4 199� D ■ 11240 Wwks Mill Road, Suite 100, Fairfax, Krginia 22030 ■ 703.385.3566 ■ Rix 703.385.8319 Printed on �'*y rt'r0ed paper 0 11240 Waples Mill Road ENGINEERS Suite 100 ARCHITECTS Fairfax, Virginia 22030 SCIENTISTS 703.385.3566 Date: Jan.l, 1991 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department Please Reference: 9 Court Square, Box 601 Winchwster, VA 22601 Project No. 17555. 109 Invoice No. 9100088 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Client No. 07534 Sager Real Estate Principal .5 hrs @ 48.00 24.00 Project Manager 1.0 hrs @ 33.25 33.25 Engineer 2.0 hrs @ 19.90 39.80 Admin Assist .5 hrs @ 14.50 7.25 Total Direct Total Indirect TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE 104.30 156.45 $260.75 /Z346B� 119 AN 1991 �N RECEIVED y V \ZZIZ OZ6�'$� • S� March 7, 1991 SHENANDOAH ENGINEERING LTD. 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664 P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957 Frederick County Dept. of Planning and Development P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attention:Mr. Evan Wyatt Re: Sager Real Estate - Site Plan #062-90 Dear Mr. Wyatt, Enclosed are 4 copies of the revised site plan #062-90 for Sager Real Estate to be located in the Stephens City Professional Complex. These have been revised per the comments in your letter dated January 29, 1991. These revisions are as follows: 1. The Engineers certificate has been signed. 2. The use of adjoining properties has been added to sheet 2 of 4. 3. The property line on Route 647 is an arc. The radius and length were difficult to see and have been relocated to be more legible. 4. The location of the sign and size is shown on sheet 3 of 4 of the plans. 5. The maximum width of the drainage easement along the northwest property line has been added to sheet 2 of 4. 6. The person I talked to at VDOT in Edinburg said the route number for Hyde Court was 647.1 don't think they would assign duplicate numbers so it is possible a number has not been assigned to it. 7. The correct tax I.D. number has been added to note 16 of the general notes. 8. The dimension of the parking aisle and parking spaces on sheet 2 of 4 has been re- vised per your comments. 9. The percentage of landscaping has been added to sheet 3 of 4 of the site plan. I have also enclosed the review comment sheet from the Fire Marshall that was previous- ly omitted. I hope you find these revisions acceptable and can give this site plan final approval. However, if you have any questions or need additional information, please let me hear from you. cerely David L. Bushman, P. Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd. enclosures cc: Mr. Don Sager,w./encl. file CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL. �1 9 • January 29, 1991 Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd. Attn:, Mr. David L. Bushman 129 D South Main Street Woodstock, VA 22664 RE: Review Of Site Plan #062-90 Dear Mr. Bushman: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/667-0370 This letter regards my review of site plan #062-90 for Sager Real Estate of Stephens City. The Master Plan for this project was approved August 21, 1989, and the Subdivision Plat was approved on August 3, 1990. The site plan conforms to both the approved plan and plat. Overall, the site plan is designed well; however, there are a few revisions that need to be addressed in order to receive final site plan approval. I offer the following comments: 1) The engineer certificate needs your signature. 2) The use of the adjoining properties needs to be included. 3) There is no surveyed boundary (degree, minute, second) for the property boundary that fronts on Route 647. 4) If any signs are proposed for this project, the location and dimension need to be shown on this plan. 5) The width of the drainage easement along the northwestern property line is not shown. 6) Does Hyde Court have a Route number? 7) The tax map number (item 16 of general notes) is incorrect. 8) The parking aisle serving the ten (10) parking spaces needs to be twenty-two (22) feet. This may be accomplished by making the parking spaces 10' x 18' instead of 10' x 201. 9) The landscaping plan looks very good; however, the percentage of landscaped area to site area needs to be provided. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 A, • • Please address these comments and provide our department with four (4) revised site plans for final approval. To my knowledge, the only outstanding review agency comment is approval from the Fire Marshal. If you have an approval letter from him already, please contact me and I will have him provide me with the approved copy. I hope this letter is beneficial to your project. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter, or be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II EAW 0402 -90 APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST Your site plan should include the following: Administrative Information Y N ✓ 1. 8. Name of proposed development Name and address of owner Name and address of developer Name, address, and phone number of designer Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect( ,4- Date plan prepared and date of revisions A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval A space labeled "approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval General Site Information Y N — 9. Location map (scale 1:2000) — 10. Magisterial District of site _ 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 7 _ 12. North Arrow 13. Z ing of site - 7 14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures Y N 15. _ _✓ _ 16. — 17. 18. 19. 13[A 20. — 21. ✓ _ 22. 23. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels ( NO Acreage of all lots included in the plan \ The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas Location of all buildings, structures, and uses The proposed use of each building, structure, and area The location and type of all dwelling units Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts The height of all buildings and structures The location and dimension of all signs 0 > 1 7 J • • Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures (con't) Y Roads Y N 24. Location of outdoor lighting fixtures 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas ZA 26. Location and area of common open space } 27. Location and description of all recreation facilities 28. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways 29. Location of outdoor trash receptacles N / Utilities �Y N Parking Y N 30. Name and umbe of existing and Clanned stree-i-EP on and adjoining the site 31. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads 33. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways 34. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals 35. Location and idt of all semen as including access, utility and drainage e s 36. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet the Fire Code requirements 37. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces 38. Location and dimensions of -all, parking and loading spaces, driveways, arking ais es, curbing, and other features to be usea 39. Location and dimension of all handicapped spaces 0 Natural Features Y N 40. Existing and finished contour lines 3q 41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental / features _✓ _ 42. Location of streams and drainage ways Landscaping Y N 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used ,v�s��.�, 010 lao-%- --�N 44. Location of required bu fers and scning wi h cross sections or profiles Erosion and Sediment Control Y / N ✓ _ 45. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used V/ _ 46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with location, types, and examples of provisions to be used MDP : Z1 �a9 �o Ili 83 SJf3o% ION = AvPRovED '9D 0 5 December 22, 1990 SHENANDOAH ENGINEERING LTD. 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664 I'.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957 Frederick County Dept. of Planning and Development P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attention:Mr. Evan Wyat Re: Sager Real Estate Site Plan Dear Mr. W yat, Enclosed are 5 copies of the site plan for Sager Real Estate to be located in the Stephens City Professional Complex. These have been revised per the enclosed agency comments. Also enclosed is a copy of the site plan application along with a check for $1,038.00 to cover the re- quired filing fee. Copies of the revised site plan are being forwarded under this letter to the re- view agencies for there final review and records. if you have any questions, please let me hear from you. incerely, avid L. Bus man, Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd. enclosures cc: Mr. Don Sager, Sager Real Estate, Strasburg Mr. Paul Bernard, P.E., Donohue & Associates, w/encl. Mr. Bob Childress, VDOT, w/encl. Mr. John Whitacre, Fred. County Sanitation Auth., w/encl. Mr. Doug Kiracofe, Fred. County Fire Marshall, w/encl. Mr. Kenneth L. Coffelt, Fred. County Building Dept., w/encl. file CIVIL ENGINI;I;RING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMF,NTAL DEC 2 6 Jr SITE PLAN APPLICATION DATE )9r� ZZ , /9;�� APPLICATION # cu) A U Complete the following application: 1. Development Name: A?,cxSt-- "1=�t Ai 2. Location of Property: (by street name) 3. Property Owner: L-60c- I l +3c-- Address : Telephone: %03 `} 65 - 3771 4. Applicant/Agent: ,c--_ Address: Telephone: 5. Designer ��,�.15-�sL� i iic�►s� Address: �� Maw, ,.1`' Telephone : 4 S i 401 S e-n Contact:tb 5 0 6. Is this an orig nal or revised Site Plan? Original _ Revised 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: * 7 --4> . 3 ��- 8. Property Information: a) Tax Map: $5141 b) Parcel Number: c ) Tax ID # : d) Current Zoning: 1 e) Present Use: VAZ-,n, -, f ) Proposed Use: ��`•�,� i ��r,- ,c. �. g) Adjoining Property Zoning: e�-) h) Adjoining Property Use: i) Magisterial District: Q PEQ Uo I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my sty plan., Applicant's Signature: n SHENANDOAH no ENGINEERING LTD. 131 South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664 P.O. Box 462 703-459-4958 Fax 459-2957 December 22, 1990 Frederick County Dept. of Planning and Development P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attention:Mr. Evan Wyat Re: Sager Real Estate Site Plan Dear Mr. Wyat, Enclosed are 5 copies of the site plan for Sager Real Estate to be located in the Stephens City Professional Complex. These have been revised per the enclosed agency comments. Also enclosed is a copy of the site plan application along with a check for $1,038.00 to cover the re- quired filing fee. Copies of the revised site plan are being forwarded under this letter to the re- view agencies for there final review and records. If you have any questions, please let me hear from you. incerely, avid L. Bus man, P. ., Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd. enclosures cc: Mr. Don Sager, Sager Real Estate, Strasburg Mr. Paul Bernard, P.E., Donohue & Associates, w/encl. Mr. Bob Childress, VDOT, w/encl. Mr. John Whitacre, Fred. County Sanitation Auth., w/encl. Mr. Doug Kiracofe, Fred. County Fire Marshall, w/encl. Mr. Kenneth L. Coffelt, Fred. County Building Dept., w/encl. file L5 L5 V L5 DEC 2 6 CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONMENTAL COMM, ONWEALTH ®f VIRCjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER RESIDENT ENGINEER (703) 984-4133 December 26, 1990 Mr. David L. Bushman, P.E. C/O Shenandoah Engineering Ltd. 131 South Main Street P. O. Box 462 Woodstock, Virginia 22664 Dear Dave: Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance Sager Real Estate Stephens City Professional Center Route 647 Frederick County This is to acknowledge receipt of the above referenced project's revised site plans dated December 5, 1990. The plans appear satisfactory and are approved. Please advise the developer if Hyde Court is to be eligible for ultimate acceptance into the State's Secondary Road System all Lot #7 entrance design and drainage features must be built in accordance with these approved plans. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, Jerry A. Copp Trans. Ass't. Res. Engr. Ae;4-1-/� By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Sr. RBC/rf Attachment xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. F. E. Wymer (w/ plans) Mr. R. W. Watkins p �6IEadE � DES 2 7 = D , COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER September 20, 1990 Mr. David L. Bushman, P.E. Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance C/O Shenandoah Engineering Ltd. Sager Real Estate 129-D South Main Street Stephens City Professional Center Woodstock, Virginia 22664 Route 647 Frederick County Dear Dave: As requested we have reviewed the above referenced site plans dated August, 1990. Our recommendations may be found on the plans marked in red. Please revise and resubmit four (4) copies for final approval. Should any changes be deemed necessary, please design them to meet or exceed the attached recommendations. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact me. RBC / rf Attach. xc: Mr. F. E. Wymer Mr. R. W. Watkins Sincerely, Jerry A. Copp Transp. Ass't. Res. Engr. Qa kA 4 a By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21ST CENTURY .c DEC 2 6 19� �UNTY of f=REDERICI: �u u ¢rat ol' Planning and Dnelopmen- f 01 665-56`A 17( REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS F`A\ 0' 667-0 "Frederick County Inspections Department P.O. Bog 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5651 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court Square in Winchester, if,you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Name of development and/or description of the request: Location: Inspections Department Comments: f 3, 0 0 / h 0 EL,0,-, A/%Z J-! 0Jam!6-/ V I 1 1 L7f: Insect. Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS - P E RETURN T11IS eel' 9- a 6 - 9 0 :•1 `1'0 APPLIC_uNT . ) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this fora as accurately as possible in order to assist '.he agency with their review. Also, please attacL a copy of your plans and/or application form. C CC�COM��',,. D DEC 2 6 I9JO j COUNTY of' FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 665-5654 Fib\ 703 667-0370 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Sanitation Authority P.O. Boa 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. AA A-r7- a L. Applicant's name, address and phone .number: AG1 NAY'jN /Z 9 D So �l/y%.-•� ,, �o ��% Zz dzr�/ %7/ji-5o/, Name of development and//or description of the request: Location: 74 /f Sanitation Authority Comments: Ti4'�F W4;rF4 Gk� 5AFW/" YZA YIC Fj 70 T, 0.1 L P r Z oT y7 W/LL Alf /OV ST,#LL,6�6 4/NDEA 7-Af S >!'OA01,6N1 C/ TY A:1A0FA3$10"4 G'aM R4,E X 10R 0 J.f Cl. ,/O eo •iYwSN 75 Sanit. Signature & Da (NOTICE TO SANITATIONte: �ZASE RETURi4 THIS�FOM�MTO APPLICAIJ_.) ` NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in orqer to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach Li:11-9 copies of your plans and/or application FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE 4P LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 091290419 Date Received 091290 Date Reviewed 101690 Applicant Name Shenandoah Engineering LTD Address 129 D. S. Main Street Woodstock, VA 22664 Project Name Sager Real Estate Phone No. 703-459-4958 Type of Application Site Plan Current Zoning B-1 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. 12 Election District Shawnee RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No Comments: Fire lanes required in front of hydrants per Frederick County Chapter 10. Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted; Yes No X 00 Hydrant Locations; Adequate Inadequate X Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified X Additional Comments: No hydrant is shown on this site: Frederick County Chapter 10 requires a hydrant within 300' of all of the perimeter in commercial areas. One hydrant placed at the entrance, within 3` of the curb will provide adequate coverage of this site. The existing hydrant should be shown so that distances can be checked prior to site approval. Review Fime .50 hr 'tog Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal r ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS October 1, 1990 \J n rho o� L Si r Evan Wyat , Plannner c'Ic�' Si 0 'L Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, Box 601 Winchester, VA. 22601 Re: Sager Real Estate 17555.109 Dear Evan, We have reviewed the plan for the above referenced property and have the following comments: ACCESS We have no comments on the access issues. The driveway seems adequate to handle the traffic for this development. A typical cross-section of the parking lot is covered by note. DRAINAGE A drainage divide map corresponding with the drainage calculations or stormwater run-off should have been provided with the plan. In review, it appears that the drainage calculations are reasonable. A stormwater management plan was previously approved for the Stephens City Professional Complex which also includes this development. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL The proposed measures and narrative for the E & S control needed on site were provided and are acceptable. ■ 11240 Wiples Mill Rend Furliu, Virginia 22030 701385. 3566 Te•leiizx 703.385.8319 r We can recommend the approval of this plan if the above issues are addressed. Sincerely, ENGINEERS DONOHU & ASSOCIA S, INC ARCHITECTS / SCIENTISTS Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB/j la file: r/f/AD2 UH �� N�)NTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGIN�� ' �m�' FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 010291014 Date Received 010291 Date Reviewed 011891 ________ ______ Applicant Name Shenandoah Engineering LTD �..........�� Address 131 S. Main Street ....... ��.......... ..... Woodstock, Virginia 22664 -------....... -.... ................. ....... ........ .......... ....... ....... ........... ------------ Project Name Sager Real Estate -'----------'-----------'------------'--................. -........................... .................... ..... ... ......... Phone No. 703-459-4958 Type of Application Site Plan Current Zoning 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. 11/12 ___ Election District Shawnee RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes No X __..... ..... Comments: Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified ___ Special Hazards Noted; Yes No X B-1 -Continued- UH 0~� Hydrant Locations; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified ... '...... ........... ------ --- Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified X Additional Comments: B.O.C.A. Use Group "8" building - 2995 ft.2 .-- Construction type unknown. The existing hydrant at the intersection of Hyde Court and Aylor Road complies with Frederick County Chapter 10. During construction, access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times. Review Time .25 hrs. Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal imp September 10, 1990 Donohue 11240 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, Virginia 22030 • r SHENANDOAH ENGINEERING LTD. 129 D South Main Street, Woodstock, Virginia 22664 703-459-4958 Attention: Mr. Paul Bernard Dear Paul, DOi11 H .i ui�ll 1NC. + - INC. Re: Sager Real Estate of Stephens City Enclosed per Frederick County instructions, for your comment are three sets of the site plan for Sager Real Estate in Stephens City. The site is located in the�recently approved Stephens City Professional Complex. I have also enclosed one set of the plans $or the Stephens City Profes- sional Complex subdivision. 1 hope the&will assist you in your review of the project. A stormwater management plan was approved for this developement. Also enclosed is the Frederick County Cement sheet for your use. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please let me hear from you. enclosures cc: Mr. Don Sager file cerely ; S 4 David .Bushman, Shenandoah Engineering, Ltd. I lss-s% ion 'fi=1V RKe; , I�SSS• Dye) CIVIL, ENGINEERING - LAND PLANNING - ENVIRONAlENTTAL • COUNTY of FREDERICK IDepartment of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703/667-0370 Attn: DPaul UBernard r 7M• 101 11240 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, Virginia 22030 (703) 385-3566 The County Is consulting engineer has his office just north of Route 7, on Waples Mill Road in Fairfax, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicants name, address and phone number: Name of development and/or description of the request: Location: Consulting Engineers Comments: Consulting Engineer Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO ENGINEER - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach three copies of your plans, drainage calculations, stormwater management plan, erosion and sediment control measures and the application form. �) Court SCluarc P.O. R o \ 601 Winclic'tcr. Vir,ini.i 22601 "" L • rQ(pCX . �( S. 101 4o 0`w4) -5 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY SAGER REAL ESTATE of Stephens City SHENANDOAH ENGINEERING LTD. CIVIL ENGINEERING - L,1ND PLANNING - ENVIRONME,NTAL 129I) SOUTH MAIN STREET, WOODSTOCK, VIRGINIA 22664 703-459-4958 P�C,J- IDS NARRATIVE Project Description The purpose of this project is to construct a 2996 S.F. real estate sales office in the Stephens City Professional Complex subdivision located on State Route 647 in Frederick County Virginia. The office building will be constructed on Lot 7 of the complex. The property is zoned B-1, Neighborhood Business District. Existing Site Conditions The lot presently slopes in a southwesterly direction at 5.0% to a drainage culvert under route 647. The vegetation cover consist of grasses and weeds. The site is well drained by a drainage ditch constructed at the south end of the lot and the 24" CMP mentioned above that discharges onto the Interstate 81 R/W. All drainage from the site flow through the 24" CMP. Adjacent Property The property is bounded on the south and east by business zoned land with McDonalds to the south and an undeveloped lot of the complex to the east. The north side is bounded by Hyde Court which is a street under construction that serves the Stephens City Professional Complex. To the west is route 647 with the interstate immediately beyond that. Soils There are three soil categories that are located on this site. They are Berks channery silt loam 1C, Blairton silt loam 313, and Weilkert-Berks channery silt loam. A description of the soils and a location map are included at the rear of this report. The soils are indicated to have a severe to moderate erosion hazard. Critical Erosion Areas Due to the moderate slopes of the site, there is not a severe erosion hazard. However, the use of proper erosion control measures will reduce the risk of any soil loss. Erosion and Sediment Control Measures Unless otherwise indicated, all vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control practices will be constructed and maintained according to the minimum standards and specifica- tions of the Virginia Erosion and Sedimentation Control Handbook. Structural Practices Paved Ditch - 1.35 Paved ditch is to be installed as indicated on sheet 2. 2. Temporary Construction Entrance - 1.01 A temporary construction entrance will be installed where construction traffic enters Hyde Court. Page 2 • Silt Fence - 1.06 Silt fence shall be installed as shown on sheet 2 and detailed on sheet 4. 4. Construction Road Stabilization - 1.02 All roads and parking areas on the site shall be stabilized with gravel; immediately after grading. 5. Straw Bale Barrier - 1.05 Straw Bale Barriers shall be installed as shown on sheet 3 and 4 and detailed on sheet 7. Vegetative Practices Topsoil Stockpile - 1.61 Topsoil shall be stripped from areas to be graded and stockpiled for later use. The stock- pile locations shall be approved by the engineer. 2. Temporary Seeding 1.65 The topsoil stockpile and areas to be rough graded during the initial phase of construction shall be seeded with fast germinating, temporary vegetation immediately following grad- ing. Management Strategies 1. Construction should be sequenced so that grading operations can begin and end as quick- ly as possible. 2. Temporary seeding and other stabilization shall follow immediately after grading. 3. The job superintendent shall be responsible for the installation and maintenance of all erosion and sediment control practices. Permanent Stabilization All areas disturbed by the construction shall be stabilized with permanent seeding immediately following the finished grading. Seeding will be done with Kentucky 31 Tall fescue according to Std. & Spec. 1.66 of the 1980 Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. Permanently seeded areas shall be protected during the establishment with straw mulch. Stormwater Management A stormwater management plan has been previously approved for the Stephens City Pro- fessional Complex. The runoff from this site will drain into drainage facilities designed for the complex. Therefore, stormwater detention will not be required. Maintenance In general, all erosion and sediment control measures will be checked weekly and after Page 3 �J • each significant rainfall. The following items will be checked in particular. 1. The silt fence and baled straw will be checked regularly to determine if they are function- ing properly. 2. All seeded areas will be checked regularly to see that a good stand is maintained. Areas should be fertilized and reseeded as needed. Runoff Calculations The rational method was used for computing the runoff characteristics for this site. Cal- culations for runoff are summarized on the following pages. The runoff can be grouped into 2 distinct drainage areas and they are summarized on the following calculations sheet. The first drainage area covers the parking area, landscaped areas and a portion of the roof. The second drainage area consist of the remainder of this site and the rest of the Professional Complex area. Page 4 rl • CALCULATIONS AND SOILS INFORMATION Page 5 0 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DA Acres C tc i(2) i(10) Q(2)cfs Q(10)cfs 1 0.23 0.85 5 5.30 6.30 1.04 1.23 2 3.41 0.75 15 3.30 4.60 8.44 11.76 1 & 2 3.64 0.75 15 3.30 4.60 9.01 12.56 culvert under Rte. 647 n(CMP)=.023 Culvert Inv. In Inv. Out L(ft) D(in.) S(%) Q(des)cfs q(10)cfs v(10)fps From: Type Cap.Chk EX 745.20 743.70 68.0 24 2.21 19.03 12.56 6.46 DA-1 & 2 CMP o.k. NOTE- DRAINAGE AREA 2 INCLUDES THE REMAINDER OF STEPHENS CITY PROFESSIONAL COMPLEX. 12 0 Soil Survey below a depth of 8 inches by shale fragments. The surface layer and the subsoil are very strongly acid or strongly acid, except where the soil has been limed. Most areas of this soil are used for cultivated crops and hay and pasture. A few areas are used as woodland and orchards. This soil is fairly well suited to cultivated crops. It is droughty during dry periods. Erosion is a moderate hazard if cultivated crops are grown. Controlling erosion is a major management concern. Using conservation tillage, crop residue management, growing cover crops, and including grasses and legumes in the cropping system help to reduce runoff and control erosion and to increase the organic matter content in the surface layer and the available water capacity. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the amount of available nutrients in the soil. This soil is well suited to hay and pasture. Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and legumes and preventing overgrazing are major pasture management concerns. Overgrazing causes increased runoff and excessive erosion. Using stocking rates within carrying capacity, deferred grazing, using rotation grazing, and liming and fertilizing help to maintain a good stand of grasses and legumes, to reduce runoff, and to control erosion. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the amount of available nutrients in the soil. Potential productivity for trees on this soil is moderately high. The soil is managed mainly for pine. Seedling survival is affected by droughtiness during the growing season. Depth to bedrock is the main limitation to use of this soil for community development. This soil is in capability subclass Ile. 1C—Berks channery silt loam, 7 to 15 percent slopes. This soil is moderately deep, strongly sloping, and well drained. It is on broad valley uplands that are dissected by drainageways. Slopes are smooth, commonly complex, and about 500 to 2,500 feet long. Areas of this soil are long and narrow or irregularly shaped and range mainly from 3 to 50 acres. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown channery silt loam 8 inches thick. The subsoil is yellowish brown very channery silt loam about 14 inches thick. The substratum, to a depth of 30 inches, is strong brown extremely channery silt loam. Shale bedrock is at a depth of 30 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small intermingled areas, generally less than 2 acres each, of Blairton and Weikert soils. Blairton soils are moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained. They are in slight depressions and along waterways. Weikert soils are shallow. They are near slope breaks. These included soils make up about 10 percent of this map unit. Also included are small areas of soils that have a surface layer of silty clay loam and small areas of rock outcrops. These included soils and areas of rock outcrops make up about 5 percent of this map unit. Permeability in this Berks soil is moderate. The available water capacity is very low. Runoff is medium to rapid. The erosion hazard is moderate. Tilth is fair, and natural fertility and organic matter content are low. The shrink -swell potential in the subsoil is low. The root zone extends to a depth of about 30 inches, but it is restricted below a depth of 8 inches by shale fragments. The surface layer and the subsoil are very strongly acid and strongly acid, except where the soil has been limed. Most areas of this soil are used for cultivated crops, hay, and pasture. A few areas are used as woodland and orchards. This soil is fairly suited to cultivated crops. It is droughty during dry periods. Erosion is a moderate hazard if cultivated crops are grown. Controlling erosion is a major management concern. Using conservation tillage, crop residue management, growing cover crops, and including grasses and legumes in the cropping system, and liming and fertilizing help to reduce runoff, to control erosion, and to increase the organic matter content. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the amount of available nutrients in the soil. This soil is well suited to hay and pasture. Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and legumes, and preventing overgrazing are major management concerns. Overgrazing causes increased runoff and excessive erosion. Using stocking rates within carrying capacity, deferred grazing, using rotation grazing, and liming and fertilizing help to maintain a good stand of grasses and legumes, to reduce runoff, and to control erosion. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the amount of available nutrients in the soil. Potential productivity for trees on this soil is moderately high. The soil is managed mainly for pine. Seedling survival is affected by droughtiness during the growing season. Depth to bedrock and slope are the main limitations to use of this soil for community development. This soil is in capability subclass [Ile. 2—Birdsboro loam. This soil is very deep, nearly level, and well drained. It is on flood plains and low terraces along the larger streams in the county. Areas of the soil commonly are long and winding, and follow the streams. They are about 500 to 5,000 feet long. They range mainly from about 5 to more than 50 acres. Slope ranges from 0 to 3 percent. The soil is subject to flooding. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown loam about 13 inches thick. The subsoil in the upper part is yellowish red, mottled silt loam to a depth of 21 inches. In the next Frederick County, Virginia 13 part it is yellowish red silty clay loam to a depth of 34 inches. In the lower part it is yellowish red, mottled silty clay loam and yellowish red, mottled silt loam to a depth of 60 inches or more. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas of Craigsville, Pagebrook, and Wheeling soils. Craigsville soils are along stream banks and high water channels. Pagebrook soils are in slightly concave areas. Wheeling soils are scattered throughout this map unit. These included soils make up about 15 percent of the map unit. Permeability of this Birdsboro soil is moderate, and the available water capacity is high. Runoff is slow. The erosion hazard is slight. The surface layer is friable and easily tilled when moist, but breaks up into clods if the soil is tilled when too wet or too dry. The shrink -swell potential in the subsoil is low. The root zone extends to a depth of 60 inches or more. Natural fertility is medium, and organic matter content is moderate. The soil commonly is strongly acid, except where the soil has been limed. The soil is subject to rare flooding. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 2 to 6 feet from November through March. Most areas of this soil are used as pasture and woodland. A few areas are used for cultivated crops. This soil is well suited to cultivated crops. Crops respond well to lime and fertilizers. Using conservation tillage, growing cover crops, including grasses and legumes in the cropping system, and crop residue management help to maintain organic matter content and soil tilth, to reduce crusting, to increase water infiltration, and to control erosion. This soil is well suited to hay and pasture. Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and legumes and preventing overgrazing are major pasture management concerns. Overgrazing causes surface compaction and increases runoff and erosion. Using stocking rates within carrying capacity, deferred grazing, using rotation grazing, and liming and fertilizing help to maintain a good stand of grasses and legumes, to reduce runoff, and to control erosion. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the amount of available nutrients in the soil. Potential productivity for trees on this soil is moderately high. Seedlings survive and grow well. The windthrow hazard and the equipment limitation are slight. Flooding is the main limitation to use of this soil for community development. This soil is in capability subclass I. 313—Blairton silt loam, 2 to 7 percent slopes. This soil is moderately deep, gently sloping, and moderately well drained to somewhat poorly drained. It is along heads of drainageways and in broad upland depressions Slopes are smooth or slightly concave or convex and about 500 to 3,500 feet long. Areas of this soil commonly are elongated. They range from 3 to more than 200 acres. Typically, the surface layer is dark brown silt loam about 9 inches thick. The subsoil extends to a depth of 30 inches. In the upper part it is yellowish brown, mottled silty clay loam. In the lower part it is light yellowish brown, strong brown, and mottled channery silty clay loam. The substratum, to a depth of 36 inches, is yellowish brown, mottled very channery silt loam. Fractured shale is at a depth of 36 inches. Included with this soil in mapping are small areas, generally less than 3 acres each, of Berks, Clearbrook, and Weikert soils. Berks soils are well drained. They are on low knolls and ridges. Clearbrook soils are along waterways. Weikert soils are near slope breaks and in eroded areas. These included soils make up about 25 percent of this map unit. Permeability in this Blairton soil is moderately slow. The available water capacity is low. Runoff is medium. The erosion hazard is moderate. Tilth is fair, but the soil breaks up into clods if tilled when too wet or too dry. Natural fertility and organic matter content are low. The shrink -swell potential in the subsoil is low. The root zone extends below a depth of 23 inches, but root growth is restricted by the seasonal high water table. The surface layer and the subsoil commonly are strongly acid or very strongly acid, except where the soil has been limed. The seasonal high water table is at a depth of 1 /2 foot to 2 feet from November through March. Most areas of this soil are used for cultivated crops, hay, and pasture (fig. 2). Many areas are used as woodland. This soil is moderately well suited to cultivated crops if drainage is installed. The soil is droughty during the growing season. Crops respond well to lime and fertilizers. Using conservation tillage, growing cover crops, including grasses and legumes in the cropping system, and crop residue management help to control erosion, maintain organic matter content in the surface layer and soil tilth, to reduce crusting, and to increase water infiltration. This soil is well suited to hay and pasture. The growing season for alfalfa commonly is short because of the seasonal high water table. Establishing and maintaining a mixture of grasses and legumes and preventing overgrazing are major pasture management concerns. Overgrazing causes surface compaction and increases runoff and erosion. Using stocking rates within carrying capacity, deferred grazing, using rotation grazing, and liming and fertilizing help to maintain a good stand of grasses and legumes, to reduce runoff, and to control erosion. Liming is needed to offset the acidity of the soil. Fertilizing generally is required to increase the amount of nutrients in the soil. Potential productivity for trees on this soil is moderately high. The soil is managed for hardwoods and pine. Seedlings survive and grow well if competing vegetation is controlled. The soil is soft when wet, and thus does not support heavy logging equipment. FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA - SHEET NUMBER 47 r Ti FEET •.'•- ;>v: •:/M'.,•+�• ". / 81 f :. Y ti 619 } a r 33E 33E u 6C 1C +r . C •0 326 7C �y K zya r.,.`.t 9C ££s s 6C 86 J 448 .r' r: EB �396 • J 14oi 8 + r 328 t 8C r / r- a 32B 32C L; 6C ' a 2C 0 r' l O aaa n r SC tr: 8C a 9B, 6, 3<�' `+ r E" 0 j a r 6C 3 2 B f' '7 C;/' j •c?�• :y' i148 328 �. 9B ... f ' 36 ..14C 6C +-� �►�G]�7y ryFs 8C 1 D f 9B 1 +v * r 3B 6C ! y olo 9- oil 32C 3B 32C `L 28 6C ; y C a • x • 38 k, '+�• ~-5- I• WA 29'316 Li tea 43 ,� `'..'X C • r36f 7Y 448" /14 35 ' �+ �i r 7C • �T 5B . 20C r r. 1 y 6C . r . ? 41C.' 1C 41D 1C '1C s Y \ ♦ 35 `A„ f•, • X r.. • ��` v '�i �, M j • ` 31C 58 B 38 B%r' 9C M rnof F %'t + ~ • 3C 1 C 3B 4.3 '1 T ic 86 t �! 3/ 9C 41E 35 41D 1C I �_ �• 3E i i 35 313 9B rr .' 20 a 38 ^�. >t 3C 3C y 41D 1B