The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About017-82 Winchester T.V. Cable - Stonewall - Backfile39.eyaxfluen# of Planning an-� �F 6'el.npun# DIRECTOR JOHN T. P. HORNE DEPUTY DIRECTOR STEPHEN M. GYURISIN M E M O R A N D U M TO: Department of Inspections Zonin Health Department Sanitation Authoritv HiQhwav Department FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director SUBJECT: Review comments on P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 ATTN Mr. John Dennison ATTN Mr. Stephen Gyurisin ATTN Mr. Herbert Sluder ATTN Mr. Wellington Jones ATTN Mr. W. H. Bushman Date August 31, 1982 Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Rezoning X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T.V. Cable or their representative Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This space should be used for review comments: Signature Date 703/662-4532 4reberiek Cnann#g ECE1VEp SEP 1 3 ;982 Repar#men# of 1lanning anb pr6daymen# �� Z 7ee �2g3031 DIRECTOR JOHN T. P. HORNE P. 0. BOX'' DEPUTY DIRECTOR STEPHEN M. GYU RISIN M E M O R A N D U M �.' 9 COU�r SQt.1.aa4 WINCHESTER `VIRPINQi :22601 C-, GO �r) V TO: <l 9 S Department of Inspections , ATTN Mr. John Dennison Zoning ATTN Mr. Stephen Gyurisin Health Department ATTN Mr. Herbert Sluder Sanitation Authority ATTN Mr. Wellington Jones Highway Department �/, ATTN Mr. W. H. Bushman FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director Date August 31, 1982 SUBJECT: Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Subdivision X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T.V. Cable or their representative Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This space should be used for review comments: No obiections to site plan. Entrance permit was applied for and constructed several years ago. Signature 'i ) Date :/-� - c, 703/662-4532 ,�zE1iEXit% �i anntg flepaztment of Planning anb a, efzeiayinjent DIRECTOR JOHN T. P. HORNE DEPUTY DIRECTOR z-HEN M GYURISIN C)0- ---,nS --• -1 --+ P. 0. sox 601 ., 9 COURT SQUARE If WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 M E M 0 R IA N D U M - TO: -- Department of Inspections ,`'ATTN Mr. John Dennison Zoning Health Department Sanitation Authorit Highwav Department I�•.1�'iT':1John T. P. Horne ATTN Mr. Stephen Gyurisin ATTN Mr. Herbert Sluder ATTN Mr. Wellington Jones , ATTN Mr. W. H. Bushman Director Date August 31, 1982 ,- 1 SUBJECT: Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Subdivision X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T.V. Cable or their representative Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This space should be used for review comments: Central water and sewer, if needed, will have to be extended by developer from existing lines located on the east side of Route 522. Signature Date 703/662-4532 �re�erYe�; Gunn#g n l� Department of 1Ianning an4 pefrelnpmen# CT 5 198� DIRECTOR JOHN T. P. HORNS P. O. Box 601 DEPUTY DIRECTOR 9 COURT SQUARE STEPHEN M. GYURISIN WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 M E M O R A N D U M TO: Department of Inspections , ATTN Mr. John Dennison Zoning ATTN Mr. Stephen Gyurisin Health Department ATTN Mr. Herbert Sluder Sanitation Authority ATTN Mr. Wellington Jones Highway Department ATTN Mr. W. H. Bushman FROM: John T. P. Horne, Director SUBJECT: Review comments on Date August 31, 1982 Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Subdivision X Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T.V. Cable or their representative Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as ---------------------------------------------------------------------- This space should be used for review comments: — . A n n Signature Date 6aXZ 703/662-4532 H. RONALD BERG PLANNING DIAXCTOR DOROTHEA L. STEFEN ZONING AommisTRATOR TO: 4reberick C, outttg DFpartmmt of IdIttrining anb pebel.apment m e m o r a n d u m P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA, 22605 Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATTN Laurel Fisher Va. Dept of Highways and Transportation ATTN Reginald C. King Dept of Planning and Development , ATTP: H. Ronald Berg Dept. of Public Works ATTN Stan Pangle FROM: Dorothea L. Stefen, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Date October 20, 1978 Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Subdivision xxxx Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T V Cable or their representative Howard P. Lewis (667-4424) review the attached and return your comments to me by This space should be used for review comments: Will you please November 10, 1978 S MI6 42 Sir -nature L1,-'�C Date 703/662-4532 v 43 7 1979 �EcEI H. RONALD BERG PLANNING DIRBCTOR DOROTHEA L. STEFEN ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO: Areberirh (El nnnt Repartm2nt of 1hanning and 30 r.e opment 11S) m e m o r a n d u m V P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE* WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATTN Laurel Fisher Va. Dept of Highways and Transportation , ATTN Reginald C. King Dept of Planning and Development , ATTN H. Ronald Berg_ Dept; of Public Works , ATTN Stan Pangle FROM: Dorothea L. Stefen, Zoning Administrator SUBJECT: Date October 20, 1978 Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Rezoning xxxx Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T V Cable or their representative Howard P. Lewis (667-4424) Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me by November 10, 1978 ---------------------------------------------------- This space should be used for review comments: Signature 703/662,4532 Date h H. RONALD BERG PLANNING DIRYCTOR DOROTHEA L_ STEFEN ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO: rebericft 11 Department of 11Ianning anb P- 621.E znQn# 61' O P. O_ Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE m a III o r a n d u III WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATTN Laurel Fisher Va. Dept of Highways and Transportation ATTN Reginald C. King Dept of Planning and Development ATTc: H. Ronald Berg Dept. of Public Works ATTN Stan Pangle FROM: Dorothea L. Stefen, Zoning Administrator Date October 20, 1978 SUBJECT: Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Subdivision xxxx Site Plan Ile are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T V Cable or their representative Howard P. Lewis (667-4424) review the attached and return your comments to me by This space should be used for review comments: Will you please November 10, 1978 Signature _ _ _ rate 703/662-4532 H. RONALD BERG PLANNING DIRKCTOR DOROTHEA L.. STEFEN ZONING ADMINISTRATOR TO: D e artm�n# }� zz� �ittxtnin� �nc� ��.f�El.a�xxTiQtT# � P. O_ BOX 601 9 COURT SOUARE' III e m o r a. n d u III WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22807 Frederick -Winchester Health Department p,TTxT Laurel Fisher Va. Dept of Highways and Transportation ATTN Reginald C. King Dept of Planning and Development Ate; H. Ronald Berg Dept. of Public Works , ATTNL Stan Pangle FROM: Dorothea L. Stefen, Zoning Administrator Date October 20, 1978 SUBJECT: Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Subdivision Rezoning xxxx Site Plan. We are reviewing the enclosed request by ',9inchester T V Cable or their representative Howard P. Lewis (667-4424) Will you please review the attached and return your comments to zee by November 10, 1978 This space should be used for review comments: The existing entrance will be acceptable at this time. When the site is further` developed it will be necessary to secure a permit from this Department and improve the entrance to the minimum standards at that time. Oct. 25 1978 Signature Date �r-.rit�tJ �.. Date_ � 703/662- 53? ; f rebnirh 0 uuntu Bepartra-ent of 1hanning and P.621apment 3 H. RONALD BERG PLANNING DIRKCTOR P. O. BOX 60I DOROTHEA L. STEFEN 9 COURT SQUARE ZONING ADMINISTRXrON m e Ill o r a n d u m WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 TO: Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATT-L%T Laurel Fisher Va. Dept of Highways and Transportation ATTIN Reginald C. King Dept of Planning and Development AMT H. Ronald Berg Dept. of Public Works ATTN Stan Pan le FROM: Dorothea L. Stefen, Zoning Administrator Date October 20, 1978 SUBJECT: Review comments on Conditional Use Permit Rezoning Subdivision xxxx Site Plan We are reviewing the enclosed request by Winchester T V Cable or their representative Howard P. Lewis (667-4424) review the attached and return your comments to me by This space should be used for review comments: Will you please November 10, 1978 D-s� .E' 5,o ��5 .� /. fc,/-� /rv� /� �� , �%s1'��, > c3. �<.� ✓ j� :ems r�� ,�' Y u ') / /" Signature Da to 703/662- ;ss? l / n�OOq/ DID SITE PLAN No. 025-78 (Amended) Winchester T.V. Cable Location: Southeast side of Route 522N in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Proposed Use & Improvments: To carry on the proposals made on the site plan (No. 025-78) which was approved on November 30, 1978. T.V. Cable is in the process of transporting fill to the area defined by the site plan for future development. Review Evaluations: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers - Inasmuch as the proposed work does not involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, this office has no objections to the proposed work and a Department of Army permit is not required. Va. Dept. of Highways and Transportation - We have been advised by our Hydraulic's Engineer that the design should be adequate for the normal floods through the 25 to 50 year frequency. This is in the same range as the design of the 6' X 6' box culvert under Route 522. A pipe culvert will be required under the proposed street at its connection to Route 522 when the street is built. Department of Public Works - Satisfactory. Erosion and sedimentation permit will be required. Planning and Zoning - No comment. Staff Recommendation: Approval. 12 10 9 a 7 S i - 2 CHART I 600 (1) (2) (3) SOO EXAMPLE e f 10 400 9'. 2' :0. 0 • 75 cto 6 7— 7 e o/Iflcf•/fl. 300 Inlet 6— feet 6 S 6 7 (I) 1.7e 3.5 S 6 200 (2) 1.90 3.9 1 S (3) 106 41 4 4 3 3 3 ~ 100 e0 .-� ; 2 - �J'Tr✓ boo; 2 2 / u 50 = 1.5 7,2- 1 _ �O Z 40 W 1.5 1.5 = / o\ 30 rj o _ / H G � 20/ w 1.0 3 �- - 9 1.0 l0 / W Ae�N •1 _ I— / t, •In�Nll O. -� 9 f i = 10 flerc G e / u e m o a 6 ; � O O S MW WINGWALL < SCALE 7 .7 I.-4 p FLARE _ .6 a ¢ (I) 30• to TV 3 (!) 90• N4 15• (31 0•(olUAcNAc .S 2 of 6.040) .S .S To use scale (2) •r (3) project I1or11"vellf to scale (1), IINA YN str s1sn1 '0411mod 11116 t11re"k .4 1 0 sod 0 scabs, or favors* as Illustrated. e .4 4 .6 30 •35 .35 S HEADWATER DEPTH FOR BOX CULVERTS WITH INLET CONTROL 91111(AU OF OU9L-C nOA07 JAN 1963 22 (5-21) Zg pecial months in advance, evaluating he work of scores of young up-and- oming comedians with Chase and Tanning the format. Associate roducer Flip Connel soon contri- uted his administrative abilities, rying to ensure that everything would ome off like clockwork. There were a umber of indispensable staff embers including producer/director allner, associate producer Connel, ugow, chief enginering manager lbaum and free-lance A.D. Molly titzel. Roughly $125,000 worth of dditional personnel and equipment ounded out the production. A.D. Stitzel joined the growing earn about two weeks prior to roduction and assisted Callner hrough the end of post -production six eeks later. The energetic assistant irector kept notes during pre- roduction, cued all of the six cameramen and the stage manager during the actual taping, and kept track of hundreds of shots during the editing phase. Her self -appraisal is ,almost an understatement: "The A.D.'s responsibility is the total organization of the production." offense, associate producer Flip Connel played defense. Connel noted, "The associate producer is really hard to define —you have to be aware of all the elements of the show and keep the producer/director informed of every- thing that's going on." The HBO production staff's on - location homesickness is assuaged with very liberal expense accounts. Connel laments, "Our office is in New York, but we spend an awful lot of time-100 days or more per year —on the road in such places as Las Vegas, Los Angeles, St. Croix (Virgin Islands), Sarasota, Miami, San Francisco, Philadelphia, Denver, Providence, Lake Tahoe and Pheonix, etc." The logistics of the actual pro- duction saw a small army of people ranging from cameramen and costumers through cocktail wait- resses. Everything from mobile videotape vans through miles of cable invaded the L.A.'s famous Comedy Store nightclub over two days for a one-night, one-shot taping in front of a live audience. An oversold house of 500-plus screaming and steaming ered in 100' heat to witness the event. Somehow Marty Callner and the HBOers were able to pull it all together and ran just a half hour behind schedule. The Complexities of Covering Comedy This was no small feat considering that there was no camera blocking rehearsal and no top -to -bottom dramatic rehearsal. (Callner did, however, rehearse each of the six young comedians individually. Four of them —Bill Kirchebauer, Iry Burton, Richard Blezer and Denny Johnston — were included in the final edited version of the special.) Molly Stitzel explains, "Chevy Chase wanted to be as spontaneous as possible and didn't want to go through that ... When you're working with comedians, a blocking rehearsal is really irrelevant because they do their `bits' in different order each time, depending on audience response ... This is why taping comedy is difficult. We have t be totally flexible and have our cameras in position to cover every thing." 1.�. 0�2 0 2 �? J �f ij ;) ?I t,, J- 1-4 DNIr; G 0 e =,,1 d UIi C,-A'40 rl 522 + WIL x 742.5 52 ?150 -775 NEA-� 800 7 75 D 0 N.-- YEAR 5 M I N. 10 M I ff l5MIN. 30MIN. 60MIN. 120:mlt; 0 QAIA I a inter 1 7 n548 1 5.2220 3.E535 2.1848 9.5 9 8 ct D 0 .7 cr cn 6 z 5 ��Z rh - F Z z z 4w � M 19 4. HYDRAULICS ive Imperviousness' Factor C .............. .75to.95 ............... .80to.95 .70 to .90 ............... .35to.70 .40 to .65 ............... .30to.55 .15 to .40 ............... .10to.30 .05 to .20 ............... .00to.10 CS t influence the amount and rate of ltivation d, frozen —pervious or impervious of drainage channels on the water - time of a drainage structure should terigtics. Where the drainage area ver, the runoff should be weighted er present. or runoff from the remotest part of esign. This is known as the time of design method but must be clearly e method and its proposed refine- mmended by the Bureau of Public topographic map or determined in �tos, or a survey comparable in ac- e:' cy rainfall at the outlet of a grassed of a hill with the contributing area etc pavement, 26 ft of gravel shoul- 11 FSTIAIATING RUNOFF H (Ft) 500 400 300 EXAMPLE Height = 100 Ft 00 Length=3,000Ft Time of concentration=14 Min 150 O ` \EX\ P( E 0 Q 50 40 30 >�ii > °- Note: ° ~ 0 20 Use nomograph Tc for natural 0 E basins with well defined channels, for overland flow on bare eorth,and for mowed grass road- cc, 0 10 side channels For overland flow, grassed sur- E 0 faces, multiply Tc by 2� E rn 5 For overland flow, concrete or o 0 q asphalt surfaces, multiply Tc by 0.4 3 For concrete channels, multiply Tc by 0.2 2 8osed on study by P.Z. Kirpich, GiviI Engineering, Vol. 10, No.6, June 1940, p. 362 L (Ft) - 10,000 5,0 3�00 0 \ o 2,000 \ a, 1,500 0 v 1,000 0 d E 500 300 200 150 100 Fig. 4-5. Time of concentration of rainfall on small drainage basins. Tc (Min) 200 150 100 = 80 — 60 — 50 = 40 = 30 25 = 20 15 10 8 6 5 4 3 2 der, channel, and 200 ft backslope of grassed pasture —giving a weighted (' _- 0.35. The channel grade is 0.5 per cent; and the outer edge of the con- tributing area is 4 ft above the channel. Location is near Washington, I.C. The distance front the channel to the ridge of the area is 210I'1 and Ihat of the channel is 400 Il making I. = 610 fl. The height of the most remote IfIt1111 1lhoec 1110 1111110 1 ll 1 01.0115 - .11111► r, II 1111111 1 11-1 •1 1. Ilu time of concentration, Tc _- 7 min. The rainfall intensity for a 7 minute duration and 10-ycar return period ix 6.8 in. per hr. (Fig. 4-6). The drainage area = 238 X 400 = 95,200 sq ft or 95,200_ = 2.2 acres 43,560 Then Q = 0.35 X 6.8 X 2.2 = 5.2 cfs. _IS In �� • \r .'% I / I i � 4 .t�'•/ If • J 7 ' I � ° IP 'ZIP' 0 r r In re 11 rCL s� � �)� ;n ;..• III �� xesv �Q BAOI/ i, l�� / �1• ° 0 �0 :so�� , At n e n• �� -��. . ° u •� 11 sc it ( `" •y S'' �,•)) �� „��) xis ; '�'�� Q ��, • • , ' `pJ „ • . 'I stlnen JChapel heh toywido 11 -�50 � • i � O r b Too!rs l Jr High •.• '. r0 /c,' _ � 'I� `�. l� •� � � 37 IF A. ��• 7 • / • / I Ta ��• �II � � � pp I q/ E o•. •t //. I•� � i •��, � � �h IN 621e • y `) �bnA 50) ..i • b 16 'LC, Hi h h t O n e • ° n W Ril �. p • P Fp ��bl v If • �• 9 • ' ` j 11. 7te -� - '� �� , 11 ; �a. . • �; !r'�� .� � 1 ��, JAMES M. WHITE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �30nrb of 'Snytxixi'ejaxe M E M O R A N D U M TO: Planning & Development Director FROM: County AdministratolfV1 DATE: March 16, 1981 SUBJECT: Status of Proposed Sites for Extension of Winchester T.V. Cable Services to the Fredericktowne Area P. 0. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 Pursuant to our conversation of March 13, I would request that you reply to the attached letter from Thomas M. Dickinson, Jr., Esquire, relative to the possible installation of a receiving tower on the lot owned by Fredericktowne on which the VORTAC station is currently located. I would further request that you respond to the question raised by Mr. Howard P;,,Lewis regarding the possible location of the receiving tower on a site in the County zoned A-2, Agricultural -General. Should you have any questons regarding this request, please contact me. tjb 703 — 667-2365 I.SLOAN KUYKEN DALL LEWIS M. COSTELLO WILLIAM B. HANES THOMAS M. DICKINSON, JR. ROBERT E. SEVILA GEORGE W. JOHNSTON, III DOUGLAS A. GREEN LEE I. E. WETSEL, JR. H. EDMUNDS COLEMAN, III RICHARD R. SAUNDERS, JR. J. SLOAN KUYKENDALL, III DENNIS J. McLOUGHLIN BURKE F. McCAHILL UW OFFICES KUYKENDALL, COSTELLO & HANES, P. C. POST OFFICE BOX 2760 20 SOUTH CAMERON STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 667- 4640 ., Mr. James M. White County Administrator P. O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 March 10, 1981 OF COUNSEL 'JOSEPH S. FARLAND ~ LEESBURG OFFICE POST OFFICE BOX 678 30 NORTH KING STREET LEESBURG, VIRGINIA 22075 (703) 777-5700 METRO 471-9800 Re: Fredericktowne Company - Front Royal, Va. VORTAC Station - Our File No. 22.079 Dear Mr. White: The Federal Aviation Administration, as you know, has a VORTAC station located on property in Section III of Fredericktowne Subdivison. They are relocating their VORTAC station to the Winchester Airport, and are in the process of terminating operation, if not already terminated, of the station in Fredericktowne. Winchester Cable TV Company has contacted us concerning the installation of a receiving tower on this particular location for purposes of receiving from Winchester cable television transmissions. They plan to provide cable television service in the Fredericktowne Subdivision. We have discussed the matter briefly with John Riley and he had suggested that we write this letter to you in order to formerly start the process seeking to obtain approval of the location of the cable television receiving antenna on this site. The theory would be that this would be a continuation of a non -conforming use within this particular zoning classification. There is some question as to whether or not these two uses are in the nature of utilities. Please advise of the county's position concerning this proposed use as soon as possible. Sincerely, omas M. Dickinson, Jr. TMD/ss 'l' 9 E A' rebrrni.ck Gaun#u o Pe -part en# of Planning anb pefx.e oymen# JOHN RILEY PLANNING DIRECTOR P. O. BOX 601 9 COURT SQUARE JOHN T. P. HORNE WINCHESTER, YIRGINIA 2260I DEPUTY DIRECTOR M E M 0 R A N D U M February 10, 1981 TO: Mr. Lawrence Ambrogi, Common ealth Attorney FROM: John R. Riley, Director SUBJECT: OPINION - WINCHESTER TV CABLE RECEIVING SITE Winchester TV Cable is contemplating a site in Frederick County to locate a ninety foot tower and receiving dish, The site is zoned A-2, Agricultural -General, My question to you is this, can Winchester TV Cable locate under Article IV, Section 21-26, paragraph (m) "Public Utility Generating"? It is my understanding that TV Cable systems are not public utilities; but, would they be allowable under the aforementioned section? I would appreciate your assistance in this matter as soon as possible. JRR:bjs 703/662-4532 Pepax#nten# of Planning aub p.efx.elnynten# JOHN RILEY PLANNING DIRECTOR P. O. BOX 601 JOHN T. P. HORNS 9 COURT SQUARE DEPUTY DIRECTOR WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 February 10, 1981 Mr. Howard Lewis Winchester TV Cable 136 South Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Lewis: Please find attached the State Water Control Board's comment regarding the TV Cable site on Route 522 North, I would appreciate your forwarding these comments to Mr, Bruce Edens for his review and comment. Your assistance in this matter will be greatly appreciated, JRR:bjs Attachment S, ely, John R, Riley, Dire or 703/662-4532 Pepart en# of 111anning anb pefr.e oilmen# JOHN RILEY _ PLANNING DIRECTOR P. 0. HOX 601 9 COURT SQUARE JOHN T. P. HORNE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 DEPUTY DIRECTOR M E IM 0 R A N D U M February 10, 1931 TO: Mr. Lawrence Ambrogi, Commonwealth Attorney FROM: John R. Riley, Director SUBJECT: OPINION - WINCHESTER TV CABLE RECEIVING SITE Winchester TV Cable is contemplating a site in Frederick County to locatea ninety foot tower and receiving dish, The site is zoned A-2, Agricultural -General, My question to you is this, can Winchester TV Cable locate under Article IV, Section 21-26, paragraph (m) "Public Utility Generating"? It is my understanding that TV Cable systems are not public utilities; but, would they be allowable under the aforementioned section? I would appreciate your assistance in this matter as soon as possible, JRR:bjs 703/662-4532 '' IN LAWRENCE R. AMBROGI COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY DAVID S. WHITACRE ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY GLENN R. WILLIAMSON ASSISTANT COMMONWEALTH ATTORNEY onturattil 1431ir . t�a� COUNTY OF FREDERICK t� OFFICE OF THE COMMONWEALTH'S .ATTORNEY 321 S. LOUDOUN STREET WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 662-8969 February 17, 1981 John R. Riley, Director Dept. of Planning & Development Frederick County, Va. P. 0. Box 601 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Winchester TV Cable Receiving Site Dear John: CHARLES W. STANSFIELD ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT ANN C. Reely SECRETARY After reviewing the Frederick County Code, more specifically Section 21-26, I am of the opinion that a tower and receiving dish would be a permuted use under that section. In reviewing all the uses outlined in said section, especially subsections (m) and (u), a tower and receiving dish for a Cable TV company appears to be the type of use contemplated. Because of its unusual nature, this was apparently not specifically provided for when this section of the code was drafted. Furthermore, such a use is less offensive than many of those permitted in Section 21-26. If you have any further questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerer► yours, Lawrence R. Ambrogi , Commonwealth Attorney for Frederick County, Va. LRA/acr JAMES M. WHITE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR �3oarb of SuptrVtsVxO M E M O R A N D U M Planning & Development Director County Administrator 11 February 1981 C� P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 Request for definition Re: Cable TV (Public Utility) In response to your memorandum of February 5, 1981, regarding the request of Winchester TV Cable by Lewis Costello, is there a definition of "public utility" available in the Code or ordinance? I would appreciate your researching this question and replying within the next couple of days so that this matter might proceed. Thank you for your attention to this request. 1U1�,, 703 — 667-2365 COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA S7'A7' tt'A 7'E/? lip) Il l) R. V. Davis 2I1l llninillon .ti;lrcel Executive Secretary Post Office Box 11143 Please reply to: Valley Regional Office Richmond, Virginia 23230 (804) 257-0056 116 North Main Street P. O. Box 268 Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 (703) 828-2595 3 February 1981 Mr. John Riley Planning Director Frederick County Department of Planning and Development Post Office Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Riley: In regard to your request of our agency providing you with assistance con- cerning Winchester TV Cable's proposal, please find our comments below: The County should request that a registered professional engineer provide a detailed analysis concerning the impact upon the present one hundred year flood elevations upstream of the project area resulting from the construction and as- sociated fill within the drainage basin as proposed by Winchester TV Cable. 2. The County may request the engineer to include an analysis of flood control alternatives (structural and non-structural) for reducing the one hundred year flood elevation so that a cost benefit analysis may be developed. BOARD MEMBERS R. Alton Wright Chairman William L. Tate Vice -Chairman John H. Ariail, Jr. Col. J. Leo Bourassa Warren L. Braun George M. Cornell Millard B. Rice, Jr. 3. The impact of high velocity flood waters in the northern site entrance of the drainage way should be investigated. Riprap to protect the fill may be necessary. Additionally, the County may wish to require the plans to reflect a more efficient flow entrance configuration for the northern channel of the drainage way, rather than the present "right-angle" configuration. Measures to maintain channel capacity (i.e. straigntening of the channel) should be determined. Mr. John Riley 3 February 1981 Page 2 In regard to Section 21-141.3 of the Flood Plain District Section of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance concerning State Water Control Board ap- proval of "proposed alteration or relocation...", this agency will be wil- ling to grant such approval if a registered professional engineer would certify that the project will not increase the one hundred year flood elevation greater than one foot at any point (with control structures, if necessary) to remain consistent with Frederick County's Flood Plain Ordinance. Thank you for allowing us to comment upon this proposal. If we can provide any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us. Sincerely, D Y_,�YL � J, William D. Lorenz, Jr. Pollution Control Engineer /jw cc: Mr. Curt Linderman-BWCM VRO File Ban1�oFVirginia Thomas P. Grant. III Senior Executive Mr. John R. Riley Director Frederick County Dept. of Planning and Development P. 0. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 Dear Mr. Riley, Winchester December 23, 1980 RE: Winchester TV Cable Co. We have agreed to hold $5,000 for Frederick County in connection with the Winchester TV Cable Company project on Rt. 522 north, for the purpose of their providing for adequate controls of erosion and sedimentation. In the event of default or failure of Winchester TV Cable Company to perform the aforesaid control of erosion and sedimentation according to your spec- ifications, we agree to pay up to $5,000 to Frederick County upon your request by official check within ten days. We hope that this information will be helpful to you. If you should need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on us. Sincerely, TPG/brs cc: Mr. John P. Lewis Winchester TV Cable Co. Areberick (Qoun#n Pryar#mrn# of JJubfir Porky DIRLCTOR �Z P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 LAND DISTURBING PERMIT For land disturbing activity at Winchester TV Cable, Route 522N ISSUED TO: Winchester TV Cable who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Public Works. , (:�L Approving Signature Date l Q NOTICE OF RIGHT TO INSPECT An agent of Frederick County Department of Public Works shall be permitted entry to the site of the land -disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the approved plan. Signa Appli Date NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of the site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. 703 — 662-8671 9-27-78 e r_u W,PMrn71r THIS AGREEMENT made this 31st day of December , 1980 , by and between Winchester TV Cable party, parties of the first part; and the County of Frederick, Virginia, a body corporate, party of the second part; WHEREAS, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of the Land Disturbing permit for the project located at Southeast side of Route 522N in the.Gainesboro Magisterial District the party, parties of the first part, their heirs and/or assigns, agree to comply in full with the following provisions: 1. To provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction as required by the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance and shown in the approved Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. 2. It is agreed and understood that final approval of completed work can only be given by the County Engineer or Public Works Director of Frederick County, or, in their absence, the Frederick County Administrator. 3. To provide all necessary performance bonds as required by the Frederick County Code and as set forth in the Bond for Land Disturbing Permit of which this agreement is a part. In witness whereof, the party, parties of the first part has, have, hereunto set his, their hands and seal this 31st day of December, 19 80 SIGN: I 9-27-78 1 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK I / a Notary Public in and for the Sta e alad Cou ty a ores.aid, do hereby certify that wh e names are gigned to the foregoing Agreement. this day personally a eared before me in my State and County aforesaid and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this day of 19 en iad, /0- Notary Public My Commission Expires o? /,-;p5 /0:� BOND FOR LAND DISTURBING PERMIT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That Winchester TV Cabl hereinafter called the Principal, and Lawrence Ambrogi, Escrow Agent for Frederick County Bank of t hereinafter called the Surety, are held and tirmly bound unto Frederick County, Virginia, hereinafter called the County in the full and just sum of Five Thousand and no/100 --------------------Dollars ($ 9, 000_00 ), law u1 money of the United States, to which payment will and truly to be made, the Principal and Surety bind themselves and their heirs, personal representatives, assigns, and other successors in interest, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents: WHEREAS, Principal has executed the foregoing agreement of which this bond is a part thereof; and, WHEREAS, Both Principal and Surety desire to guarantee to the County performance of all of the provisions of the foregoing agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, The condition of this -obligation and bond is such that if the Principal and/or Surety shall perform all of the provisions of the foregoing agreement which is incorporated herein by this reference, then the obligation of this bond is to be void and of no effect; otherwise, it is to remain in full force and effect. It is expressly understood that this bond may be cancelled by the Surety at the expiration of sixty (60) days from the date which the Surety shall have lodged with the County of Frederick written notice to so cancel, but such notice may not be lodged earlier than the end of the time period specified in the agreement or the date of completion of construction and approval by the County, or in the event that the Principal elects not to complete the project, until the County gives approval of construction by the Principal of whatever measures are deemed necessary by the County to ensure erosion control at the site. This provision, however, shall not operate to relieve, release or discharge the Surety from any liability already accrued, or which shall accrue, on erosion and sedimentation control bonds before the expiration 6f sixty (60) day period. The Surety and the Principal hereby certify that they will within thirty (30) days of expiration of the agreement for which this bond is executed, and is a part thereof, execute a new bond and agreement for a period not to exceed six (6) months in an amount to be determined by the County to cover the work remaining and to reflect inflation costs, should the Principal not be able to complete the bonded work within thirty (30) days prior to the agreement expiration date. The Principal and Surety further certify that they will continue to execute additional new bonds and agreements in amounts to be determined by the County for subsequent periods of time not to exceed six (6) months until such time as the work has been completed and approved by the County or until the County releases the Surety and Principal, whichever is earlier. 9-27-78 pn-irould the Principal and Surety not meet the requirements of all of the above, it is expressly agreed that the County may elect to execute the bond for the full amount of the bond and utilize the proceeds as seen fit by the County in the furtherance of the project which this �j Bond and agreement cover. Provided, that in no event shall the liability of the Surety hereunder exceed the penal sum of this bond; and, Further provided that the Surety, by execution hereof, expressly waives any right he, they or it may have to review and approve any revisions to the plans, profiles, and specifications referred to in the agreement. This bond relates to the agreement dated the 31 day of 19 80 , on December In witness of all of which the Principal and Surety have hereunto set their hands and seals this ___aLday of December , 19 so SURETIES PRII�£IP Bank of Virginia (Letter of Credit) - 2 - F VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK t State and C .unty aforesaid, do 9-27-78 , a Notary Public in and for reby certify that ose names are signed to the foregoing bond, this day personally appeared before me in my State and Count; aforesaid and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand thiscd/ day of e"C�L'6e"(i Notary Pub is My Commission Expires Banl�oFVirginia Thomas P. Grant, III Senior Executive Mr. John R. Riley Director Frederick County Dept. of Planning and Development P. 0. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 Dear Mr. Riley, Winchester December 16, 1980 RE: Winchester TV Cable We have agreed to hold $5,000 for Frederick County in connection with the Winchester TV Cable Company project on Rt. 522 north, for the purpose of their providing for adequate controls of erosion and sedimentation. We hope that this information will be helpful to you. If you should need further assistance, please do not hesitate to call on us. Sincerely, A, TPG/brs CC: Mr. John P. Lewis Winchester TV Cable DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BALTIMORE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS P.O. BOX 1715 BALTIMORE. MARYLAND 21203 REPLY TO ATTENTION OF NABOP-FR Mr. Stan Pangle Director Frederick County Department of Public Works P.O. BOX 601 9 Court Square Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Pangle: ,g2 O 2)� J Au u 0 0 I9W This refers to your letter and attached plans dated 16 July 1980 to place fill material adjacent to the terminus of an unnamed tributary of Redbud Run southwest of Route 522 near Sunnyside, Frederick County, Virginia. Inasmuch as the proposed work does not involve the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, this office has no objections to the proposed work and a Department of the Army permit is not required. The information provided with your letter is being returned as requested. Sincerely yours, Incl DONALD W. ROESEKE As stated Chief, Regulatory Re ulato Functions Branch � CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED RECEIVED pUG 1 3 1980 �H STAN PANGLE. JR. DIRECTOR .�x.e�.extck �zxnn�g �e rttx xtten# of 1jubfir orbs July 16, 1980 Mr. Frank Bonomo U.S. Army Corp. of Engineers P. O. Box 1715 Baltimore, Maryland 21200 Dear Frank: aJ 2 3 P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 As per our phone conversation today, here is the site plan that we were discussing. My main goal is to insure ample storage without damage to up stream'property after the development of the proposed fills are made. If you need additional input, please don't hesitate to call. We will need the information returned with your comments. Thank you for your help. SP:gh Respectfu y, r., Stan Pangle 703 — 662-8671 HAROLD C. KING, COMMISSIONER LEONARU R. HALL, BRISTOL, RRLCT D6S1'R/C7, HORACE G. FRALIN, ROANOKE,.SAL. DI.STRIC7 WILLIAM E. ANDERSON. DANVILLE.. N 118URG R WILLIAM F. MOHR, RICHMOND, RIC'll, ND D/STI -I WILLIAM T. ROOS, YORKTOWN, SUFF K D/STR/ WILLIAM T. ROBINSON, WEST POINT, F.DFR/CF L WILLIAM B. WRENCH, SPRINGFIELD, C PFPFR L T, ROBERT S. LANDES, STAUNTON, STAL TON DLSi C T. RAY HASSELL, III, CHESAPEAKE, AT . RGE,' BA CHARLES S. HOOPER, JR., CREWE. AT LARG&RURAL DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH ®f VIRCjIN]IA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS & TRANSPORTATION 1221 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, 23219 July 9, 1980 Re: Mr. John T. P. Horne Deputy Director . Department of Planning and Development P. 0. Box 601 9 Court Square Winchester, VA. 22601 Dear Mr. Horne: LED E. BUSSER, III DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & CHIEF ENGINEER J. T. WARREN DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATION J. M. WRAY, JR. DIRECTOR OF OPERATIONS H. R. PERKINSON, JR. DIRECTOR OF PROGRAM MANAGEMENT W. L. BRITTLE, JR. DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING OSCAR K. MABRY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING IN REPLY PLEASE REFER TO 1550 Commerce Street Winchester, VA/,/ 22601 0/ Route 522 Frederick County Site Plan Winchester T, . V . Cable We are returning the site plan and related data enclosed with your letter dated June 10, 1980, requesting a review by our Hydraulic's Engineer. We have been advised that the design should be adquate for the normal floods thru the 25 to 50 year frequency. This is in the same range as the design of the 6 x 6 box culvert under Route 522. A pipe culvert will be required under the proposed street at its connection to Route 522 when the street is built. If there are any questions, please advise. Sincerely yours, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer q I,/ By: R. C. Kin Asst. Residen4E' ineer RCK/jag `Y r r M STAN PANGLE, JR. DIRECTOR Winchester TV Cable 136 S. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Lewis: Ar juj .ertrh ELTInitu Pqarffitent of Public Al.arl;!N April 10, 1980 P. O. Box 601 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 It has come to the County's attention that a land -disturbing activity is presently occurring on your property located at Route 522 N., at the Relay Station in the Gainesboro Magisterial District of Frederick County. This activity is in violation of the Erosion.and Sedimentation Control Ordinance for Frederick County, which requires that a permit be obtained before the commencement of a land -disturbing activity of greater area than 10,000 square feet. It is respectfully requested that you cease the land -disturbing activity until a land -disturbing permit has been obtained from this office. The requirements for obtaining such a permit are available at this office, so please contact me as soon as possible so that we may bring you into compliance with this Ordinance. SP:mh Sincerely yours, Stan Pangle Director of Public Works 703 — 662-8671 V 11 NP O r,2.s- 7c' 7 WINCHESTER TV CABLE CO. �- Evt� A 1)I ..%11JA11 inli, ti--k P.O. BOX 908 / WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 / TELEPHONE (703) 667-442, J�v October 18, 1978 0�� U/2�1�b Mr. Ronald Berg Director of Planning Frederick County Planning Commission 9 Court Square Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Berg: This is to inform you that John P. Lewis, David P. Lewis, and Howard P. Lewis trading as Parkfield Associates have on option to purchase a 21 acre tract of land, tax number 53(A)60, off of 522 North from Leon V. Watson; therefore, Parkfield Associates are to be considered as the contact for all matters pertaining to this tract. Sincerely y.urs, Howard P. Lewis HPL:ccl SITE PLAN #017-82 Winchester T.V. Cable Zoned B-2 (Business, General) LOCATION: Route 522, immediately north of the City limits. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro Magisterial District ADJACENT LAND USE AND ZONING: Commercial and open space land use and commercial, residential, and agricultural zoning. PROPOSED USE AND IMPROVEMENTS: Construction of an office building and required off-street parking facilities. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Highways and Transportation - No objections to the site plan. Entrance permit was applied for and constructed several years ago. Sanitation - Central water and sewer, if needed, will have to be extended by developer from existing lines located on the east side of Route 522. Health Department - No objection. Department of Inspections - No objection to this site plan. Planning and Zoning - All erosion and sedimentation controls must be in place prior to construction. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Approval October 13, 1982 Mr. John Lewis 520 North Pleasant Valley Road Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Lewis: This letter is to confirm the action taken by the Frederick County Planning Commission at their meeting of October 6, 1982, with regard to your request for site plan approval. The Planning Commission approved site plan request #017-82 of Winchester T.V. Cable, zoned B-2, in the Gainesboro Magisterial District, for the construction of an office building and required off-street parking facilities. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, John T. P. Horne Planning Director JTPH/rsa Enc: Site Plan ...... �� ... C/7' ti i 0 VeW L -=1)7?A,PV eNc7�V aF 2>0,e 4,.C" C.0 Ti M.t oF�FiPolyj CIMR7, + 9 a_,9 C. S. 3 X 7 -7 Z) 3 4-7--) x 4- 57 j = 7�0 C f 7.2- X 92.68 X 3 Tel -,c J- /.4 6hi1cr,',,,',l,) = g.7FT= 74g, 5oye S-t-IR14- FT_ WA-/.z-,r A -f JX C-6 Iq f OP I A S F- -4,1 07> 7— /- A X; -tW- - - Cx/97/N� IN1EA/44 — ----- _ -_——� p - 738-====-_ 1 ':4.1_./•;( EX/3T/N C6�r Fie ..P C C UICD/.vG I (iC -�F-.tt�T_.I 7V/C D Q RE .�vPP I / ��•. Inf low GOcE 1 .,..ir..............:.-.......__ ....... \ TOE OF FILL I h` �.. ., •' �.!+'�♦C �-4.�� `N III \ II� PNASE II 00 .•.. !'f r'S.7!` T I� /NT£R/M FILL SLOPE END OF IM PHASE Z gEG1AW1jG OF IMV '-'.<^ -(t. �. PHASE Ir .JO:,le + �. M%,.• t^� ^,' O I v ``\ \ III / � � 111 i % �f•f.rA a ._ w , � I n WfRlll /// }r111 to 1 7yS' VI It / _T 1 719E OF F7L PAWW.W WE OF FILL TE� PHASE a 1 U ...... 7OE OF Y 4SE Z --- QD \S . Ir IN 'm O a-Z Z22"s OW17 H.7.L PIN Sl�Sgr / fw /'• � % `----_7—/----s�.i /—''".'..�i � �•y.l.�� ► = ry1�,v � i�► '"•,�; RI,b � ,741E—� —?'—"— — --- as /M/T Of o. /rho / ' ,I . i- ••........ //. � �_ �/U/Lp/N6 �1�) � , N:I ..._ h I I i� �j �....• gAqf ALE. SEO/HEN // TEMPI PY STRAW 9 - l _ PHASE Ir — ,. ER0510AJ AND SEDIMENT LEGEND -'" —""— PRESENT /00 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BARRIERS MUST BE _.. — P csENT 50 YEAR FLOOD PLAIN NOTE+ 'AI57ALCE49 AT 8E6/A/A/IN6 OF CANO D/5TURB/A/6 ACTIV/TY. ---------- 730----------- EXISTING CON)Y)(/R Bol*dtlrow sodimoMOt 750 PROPOSED FINISHED CONTOUR O/oc#d at too of op /p 4LC DISTURBED AREAS TO BE QEVE6ETATEO AS SOON AS eonfhvclloa 4'OSSIBLE AFTER GRADING. — — -- INTERIM FINISHED COWOUR ------745{---- EX/ST/N6 CONTOUIf AS OF 9/9/19L SEDIMENT BARRIERS AA/0 ACCUMULATED SILT TO BE RE- _ +ROVED AFTER DISTURBED AREA 15 REVEGETATED OR 7WAL FLOOD PLANE; STABILIZED. STORAGE VOLUME LC ILI WOQK SNAIL BE PERFORMED /A/ ACCORDANCE WITH THE VIR61WA EKOSION AND SEDIMENT COAITROG REMAINING STORAGE HANDBOOK. Of FILL PHASE r I wile 5- STORAGE VOLUME ON SIrE BEFORE FILL-1,579,000 Cu./P. losr TO FILL PHASE X —524,350Cu.ft PHASE lr — 470, 000 Cu. ft. FHASEM- —125,500 Cu.!!. E VOLUME AFTER ALL FILL/W IS COMPLETE — 459,150 Cu. H. 30, 'BASE .( DW84e SeAe. ............. —. t' —, OF ni-i- 7')'PICAt STREET SEC7-loAl XL p� I------ — --- — -- of "u AZ FILL PMM i _� � { r rr+'��i�r rt �� +•f^74-'"`�t.��.s , 'i^lPi�.. "��. i� J SE X.--------------- it 1 1 hi • Y I i 1 i 1 f � 1 i 1 j{4 i 1 , FIfJAI SITE PC __.-.77-7 _ ... .... ... �.Y —70 APPR p --- -- I/ zr/ ez o/is et /TE PLAN y' �f WINCHESTER T. V CABLE , STONEWALL D/STR/CT, FREDER/CK COUNTY Yd V/R6/N/A ss 17 3 w SCALE /"• 50' MAY PB, /980 PREPARED BY /aREENWAY EN6/NEER/N6 AND SURVEY/N6 CO., /NC. P. 0. ftw 666 W/NCHESTER, V/R6/N/A: .,`• �' �f'r{ t tt ••r I .:�Ct. r .4XiKJf',-i �'� AM ! 47 •{ - r t.� � y uuF A p lrvn �rxirpxis✓ ��rrixoxal ' � iZ` �� Klf' � $ ,1� � ��+r� .� . "; d ' .. � +tf� •. )✓. =i St,, y' � Y G ! - :��,��h,F��r ,'"�i, i�_ i r. c �r . Kr .�: ;e' i"„ ''• .� �79i: A r t � - aLk 1j'C� r{t}i �,` ��'9'ir ih� i+~+a+�+I ��,i �� '; � ' Nam;. '{•�.P j ,C �:., ,sr art° 4+r � :' r . � �. � ,�,� `I'�t,��r � ,c r y ,y,r�r.,��C � rT� -�� ,}1• � ��i � y �,.'r S ;C,• ✓ k','i�=.ly'.� '� d+.` !`. �j 5Fb ':t„1�Y.!� �r,�sta/FZ rs �. a4F ;. •{+tKh: AEI r. •.Mk j0% "'�;t '4• =�.> -' k .H*t 1 _ ': '.Z ':+�` .ioir 'I, VIA f t , t. " '%7iA � ,pt{��y>y�, s^ .F 2 ,$ :a t � � �$ �u ��i��,2�1t'' �� '�'• 1 �)y� � � 4 `� � ' .Ti4 ' � ., ,{P.•. ,� yr'. .j s. 1�-�µyc, �yjt%. �j`1_ .�. r'� ��k' r �i +s �.sr.' �; � ,]}.'i �,pj �, + -' .•,iS 3� dr�f, A 6 +TN Stu >f � rky , " f a � -li:Zc ." .'F..1 9 .�� . �,,�+ .J•r �r� i'Yr � �. 0`f',�.�i) M xy :�3 ��,i:�°'' to +i• 4 �"� �, t 4... .! .�ti. �.y-•i� �y'�Y}'�,�s�-�ir. '� "tjy.!y�,�J'ih� ,n t�!!;�yyt: '�' - ;, ,• �� hn�r. a �C-,/R`��:'•�,,� i•Ift � tx "i' 1 � � a,"a� i"•;` mob,{ ~� r"4a rf�. �4� r A"YJI?t �., 'i ;=� r�N�'3 S ��a. Y» - Fy'u ��Ti�,.'�4'. S �?' `�'(+ �•., ff "'"�j .� � tset+- � � � +�.r°J �ir� r' •. ,r� ',''' Ss. L �. t , x�4.a, nw ,+ - � �r,Ft" S- �(�'j ^e't'''rbti:'a� �: , t• �w ��}y��• ��"! �.+�'c� �* 61, .+Y` e�+�'at�ta' ,�,'�� •`r' f fN - .y, yY �'�I �kx. ... �� t��4. ` ,1'' t�f ��,C,'!�.�%'. � J►i."v! R 1'� �; �� --.• - f, fj '. �. a 'v ,, .' .�1 w ,{d r� .r � +I M,+i y�,„ � aj �? �, .,�. :-� �t� act g r � r.�, :Iry R• .. _ _ � . �� " �.{�, t i ,�K P- „ A 'r'ya i �tiy y. �',i'i 'IQ'� ++S `,�,yr' "'{wi. +'+�,.kk,.as-trt '.1r:?. " ddt+t�y1+•-..-,l,L 'y •- k ,:. \ ` I •i- . J ��;'��- � • � '� t ,� 1 R1 i �7� y'Q��'j'ri t„ f„ u'!i' i t�" . ? � r . " -. Y�-r�'Y+�'�".�4 _ i"j�y��i�j''4- y. , " fi'� 7�:ei "x�i ip✓ .'��1...i ^ '�iC 1 •. e5�b �r a '�"c � �1. �'. ♦ 'i •"`:. •:_ q:`(� ,�i iys �n� � i i,, ,�� '1� �,Sl �`�++Y,fra. f t'� nr. �il .4 � q fl t: ^ f ... }�3y N„. ` � fir.. •S-3�iri 7+.' 1 .:i •' ..� :n..J ,r+Y' 5. :Ht:. rN� i "�� "��A. �RA:• � + „'f.� ,d,. r 1 f�.a Pr'MV 0' .. / IL Cj NO t Ir .. -•.`� it �, Xi '�.~ ✓�fi'. k��t•ti �Yi M4��(��•aj -S � i'• - yA,kp 'fc''t,} < a.�k�1�.� � - - �- i:•5„'��t •ti "at »'+ a••YyF R ,1 r. F t-L' ^t— s' k r!J �� 't f +�yl�rr+ y, �.►� l" �y' '$''� j + t�F< ,a . � / 04 Y•} '�t3v •.,,1k h 4q "+ 1,�,� . S � t , of .!'+ .j ' k .ti, th y` ; r ♦� '� f t, �' Y 'loaf - s/rE vcAa/ W/NCAICSM9 T• ✓• CA56E JCA[E': /I - so' OEC. /.!, i9at t ` Y ' 4r J{} tit � t��a!' i ; ; 7�t� F.r F � �•.. ; , t � t } i - 4>f�,�..r ! ,, R _ �•h N OR ER STROTN ' • 79062- 028/57,W-- z I 0o HIf rT 0 h w O FREO£RICK COUNTY FpUIT 6ROW£RSINC. R1 A5SOCIATION , 21.1134 ACRES � 1 _ 3 N a � N o � S7RtJBRID6E h N I 1 W/NCHE5TER �\ OUTDOOR ADVERTISING O u � RrE Y _ 2 _ S. e� 0 RAD = 2809. 79 ARC = 342 85 CH = 342 63 CH B. = S /7 0 4/ ' 17 "E I RAD = 1772 86 ARC = 649.74 CH = 646. // CH S. = 5 310 40 '59 "E It N ��..�BRl10E x CFRT:FtCAI E No. :► 54.17.3 (,0965 5417.3 (b)162 c4 LAND a�`�• FINAL PLAT OF THE LAND OF LEON V. WA7-wlv, ET UX STONEWALL DISTRICT, FREDERICK CONNTY yR IN/A SCALE / "= 200 - SEPTEMBER 22 , /978 PREPARED BY RREENWAY EN6/NEERIAAG AND SURVEY/N6 CO., INC. PO BOX W M'/ACH£ST£R, V/R6/N/A The accompanying plat represents a survey of the land conveyed to Leon V. Watson, Et Ux by deed dated 21 April 1953 and recorded in the Frederick County Court Clerk's Office in Deed Book 232, at page 534. The said land lies on the Southwestern boundary line of U. S. Route 522, just Northwest of the City of Winchester, in Stonewall District, Frederick County, Virginia and is bounded as follows: Beginning at a fence poet a corner to Frederick County Fruit Grower's Association, Inc. and N/F Strother; running with the Northern Line of said Strother N 41' 28' 57" W - 790.62' to a fence post a corner to Hiett in the line of said Strother; thence with the line of Hiett, J. Strobridge, and Winchester Outdoor Advertising N 48c 311 04" E - 1122.521 to an iron pin not a corner to said Winchester Outdoor Advertising and in the Southwestern boundary line of U. S. Route 522, thence with the said boundary line of U. S. Route 522 for the two following courses, with the arc of a curve to the right 649.741 (Radius - 1772.86, Chord - 646.1111, Chord Bearing S 31' 401 59" E) to a point, thence with t1a arc of a curve to the right 342.851 (Radius - 2809.791, Chord - 342.631, Chord Bearing - S 170 411 17" E) to an iron pin set a I corner to said Frederick County Fruit Growers Association, Inc.; thence with the line of said Frederick County Fruit Grower's Association, Inc. S 58' 511 42" W - 888.751 to the beginning. Containing. . . . . 21.1134 Acres o��.Tl�rQpaf Surveyed. . . . . . September 22, 1978 �Il.�� E1fS x CER 1FFICATE No. 1► 54.17-3 (a)965 (, 5417 3 (b) 162 a r iE D UAL �v4 Zvi MMMM9 3 7 g. a /�- o orr 3. J 00�5 x 37. / S X 2.3 92 X D.OgO � CIV - l 0 -�d a F Ar- 70 a /-/ ' A --,CA' c .6 t N r � .E Y� �-� o �✓ � o o T77 F Co 7Ve,: N 7L 7-f277/o 71 _ �' g i� • /✓. �f�� r1 cHf�i'7`� 3 x 5. 3 x -15�o = 7:79 C.FS -5-ev 1ri �. `mil x 'T • i� T - / C j F/ ,C X/ 5 -f" / T/ G —2 o x %2X o/---. gc x /. 15 jC 0.0 G.S Yz Ci = '7 X 9%z • 99 X /. 3 / X O• D 84wl Q = 7 e7 G G 5- (:Z3ax F/-o w / NG Fw j-L) 000S- /DayoP 5-7d-R"? - Abc. )2)W � -t -,x? :D�cPf/r 4 5 � f /�.e� r� = R. 7FT= 74BB7 D y R s-t-o PAI - N,F A p w,) At /� f N 1. 3 5 h = B. / r- T: 7 ¢g. Z 7 'y fiY a F v,/✓� .Fv; A f -Bo X C-o . f e? o 4 S F o 0 --Z;l -�— /- A 1 " T! .E ._ .�,E YA 7 / a iY A ,C X/ 5 -f" / T/ G —2 o x %2X o/---. gc x /. 15 jC 0.0 G.S Yz Ci = '7 X 9%z • 99 X /. 3 / X O• D 84wl Q = 7 e7 G G 5- (:Z3ax F/-o w / NG Fw j-L) 000S- /DayoP 5-7d-R"? - Abc. )2)W � -t -,x? :D�cPf/r 4 5 � f /�.e� r� = R. 7FT= 74BB7 D y R s-t-o PAI - N,F A p w,) At /� f N 1. 3 5 h = B. / r- T: 7 ¢g. Z 7 'y fiY a F v,/✓� .Fv; A f -Bo X C-o . f e? o 4 S F o 0 --Z;l -�— /- A 1 " T! .E ._ .�,E YA 7 / a iY A