The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About137-74 Robert K. Stickley - (B-1) - BackfileNO.�� DATE 4 - 25 - 73 Revised date (3 - 27- 73) Application for Rezoning... FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Governing Body to amend the Zoning Ordinance and to change the Zoning Map of Frederick County as hereinafter re uested and q in support of this application, the following facts are shown: 1. The property sought to be rezoned is located 1W South of Stephens City between U. S. Route 11 end Interstate Highway 81 St#W on the side of the street and known as lot (s) Number `► It has a frontage of 3900 feet and a depth of 300 feet. Robert K. Stickley, Evelyn Heath 2. The property sought to be rezoned is owned by: Virginia S. Estep Stickley, as evidenced by deed from Robert K. Stickley Clerk's Office o recorded in Book 372 Page 410Cir. Ct. of Frederick C ounty 3. It is desired and requested that the foregoing property be rezoned FROM A-2 TO B -1 4. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear, and the property in front of (across street from)the property sought to be rezoned: NAME (a) Frederick County School Board (b) Julian S. Carbaugh (c) E. R. Fbx (d) Ethel M. Conner. (e) Wesley Monroe Conner STREET ADDRESS Winchester, Virginia Stephens City, Virginia Stephens City, Virginia Stephens City, Virginia Stephens City, Virginia (f) Glen P. Combs Stephens City, Virginia (g)_ Roger Sager Stephens City, Virginia (h) Mrs. Elsie Zea Stephens City, Virginia (i) Stephens City Mennonite Church Stephens City, Virginia -fie Lewis M. Costello 408 W. Clifford St., Winc)- (Use reverse side if necessary and look up the names in the office of VA in the Courthouse, if they are not known.) 5. It is proposed that the property will be put to the following use: u1irniLed Business 6. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: nr 7. It is proposed that the following setbacks and offstreet parking provisions will be made: None Individually g. Attached is a copy of a Vicinity Map. s AttoAw�tvr A#a�tEvelyn Heath Stic and Virginia S. Estep Address of Applicant TO THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF This petition for rezoning property within the jurisdiction of the of was held on was received on a public hearing , and the Planning Commission wishes to make the following recommendations to the Governing Body. By PLANNING COMMISSION Secretary ACTT N OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS On ti ' 19 -7 " the Governing Body took the following action on the attached petition for rezoning: nd y / 3 7- 7 � / T Sco/e: /" = 200' __T r _ - - - --- -- --• •. 711- 3 .k PROPOSED RE—?JNING P FOR ROBERT K. STICKLE OPEQUON DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRG 3 S�p�� •�-Q�� i~ fir. t,. �.._::s:�.� > _ — n $5 573 • 1��.' / �z11 �;9 /--� -7 - -1-71j(t? - _ . ......... j E I'T IN 200- " REG. NO. :> , :, 65 �:3 11 U,y ?o --- -- ------ An f • a �--------------------- - a Q J T 0 Q x � i-� ? -- - - -- - - - --- --- - --- -- - --�--- - -- --�- -- 2,4 1,3 7f m (D4 rA ,5 ca /to / , z zoo' � -� 61":5- Al.e L--' , 2 ,Iz rI . 1 Z ' } �I l sc-� / _ zoo' Of �• i•1 b � r'� v `A qj '16 - P.-I // 0. , 5. /1 "r /" x ; 0 ,� c �r po 6 p r 74 1 573 C � G � _ Box 96 Stephens City, Virginia 22655 January 23, 1974 Mr. H. Ronald Berg, Secretary Frederick County Planning Commission Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Berg: With reference to our conference with Mr. Riley and Mr. Kirkland, I have decided to request that the five and one-half acre portion of my land lying next to Stephens City's corporate boundary be rezoned to B-1 use, and that the residue be left unconsidered at this time. SincerelyJ, Robert K. Stickley cc: Joseph W. White, Esquire Charles H. Kirkland, C.L.S. 0-__0 C. H. KIRKLAND, LAND SURVEYOR ;7y 33 E. Roscawen Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 November 21, 1969 Mr. Roonrt K. Stickley Stephens City Virginia Dear �lir. Stickley : Following our conference on November 17 when we looked over your land to be subdivided south of Stephens City I prepared several pre- liminary plans which I am forwarding to you. The topographical map is based on maps by the Virginia Department of Hinhways in connection with the construction of Interstate Route #81 about the year 1959. I believe they are sufficiently reliable for preliminary planning of your subdivision sewers and streets. I also enclose two drawings showing a proposed lot and sewer arrar:;ement tonether with proposed streets. The plan contemplates minimum lot sizes havino eighty -foot frontage, a minimum depth of 125 feet, and a minimum area of 10,000 square feet, in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County zoning ordinance. This ordinance ai,o requires that corner lots have not less than 100-foot frontage and specifies a uniform set -back p r line of thirty-five feet from the street. Also enclosed is a set of sewer plan and profile drawings showing now the subdivision may be completely sewered. In connection with the sewer profiles you told me that the areas in the vicinity of Station 19+00 and Station 33+00 were filled in by the Wiley Jackson Construc- tion Company with spoil material during the construction of Interstate Routo if81. There is no way of finding out the depth of these fills ex- cept by actual survey, but I believe enough fill has already been pro- vided to cover the proposed sewer line oxcopt in the areas loft open for run-off water. A portion of the sewer line between the Stephens City manhole at Station 00+00 and Station 9+50 of the sewer profile present several problems, since the sewer is shown as much as six or seven eet above the present ground level. I suggested to you last Monday that this area will require filling to make it suitable for sub- division lots, and I have therefore shown the approximate height of fill and a channel to be preserved for Stephens Run that should Qonor- ally carry the sewer beneath the ground surface except where it crosses the stream. I will not be able to furnish a plan and profile of the final grades of the street work at the southern end of the subdivision until 1-41-1) . - 2 - /3;7_ ;7y a "survey has bnen made to rit�termine the extent of filling that has taken placo. In connection with the two short cul-de-sacs proposed on either side of St(j;-)hons Run, enouiah topographical. survey work must be performed to doterminn the street grades and to inakn sure that the short sewer seg- ments wi.il Flom corrE;ctly to the main sewer. 1 had solicited prices from Buckley-Lages, Inc., which I believe are ouitable for preliminary estimating purposes, tabulated here below for your use: Cost for laying U" sewer in average terrain between 4' and 6' below the surface - approximately �6.5U per foot Cost of layinq fl" sewer .line and 4" water line in separate trenches - approximately S9 per foot Cost of building a 201 road bed on a 60# right- of-way complete with stone base prime and sealcMH ditches, and occasional culverts where cl+-n and fills average approximately 31 - approximately S10 per foot ir,n above figures are for estimating purposes only and are not a firm quotation. It was pointed out also that thPr., will be extra charges for rock excavation and that the Virginia Deprirtmont of Highways now specifies CBR tests of the road bed before approval which sometimes results in the necessity of deepening the stone base to as much as twelve or fourteen inches. No reliable nstimate of rock excavation is prenrntly available for the s,OOdivision area. However, the Virginia Department of Hinhways re- contiy constructed Interstate [Route #81 parallel to and only a few hundred feat from the route of the proposed sewer and street, and evidence of rock outcrop should show in the face of the cuts. I helieve that the Highway Department will make available any information they have relating, to the actual construction of Route #81 between Stations 1342+00 and 1436+00 upon request. Re.pectfully submitted, 41 A6/ /r, r Charles H. Kirkland CHK:lck Enclosuros