Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout009-06 Tasker Woods - RA to RP 60.281 & B2 (18.9) - Shawnee - Backfile0 � N QJ O m N Q O U i $�. N cd [� O • Ci. Cl. � J � RECEIVED FROM Z ADDRESS av ❑ FOR ❑ FOR DATE `lo No. 9023 uj fYt (, k- i Y ot- a ,-� (o o AMT. OF CASH ACCOUNT AMT. PAID l V. -� CHECK 1, BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER BY 4 lk-EZONING TRACKING SAT Check List: Application Form Proffer Statement Impact Analysis Adjoiner List DATE 7 aq o� -7 Akf o� % a L,,-�o6 Application received/file opened Fee & Sign Deposit Deed Plat/Survey `' Taxes Paid Statement Impact Model Run Reference manual updated/number assigned D-base updated Copy of adjoiner list given to staff member for verification Four sets of adjoiner labels ordered from data processing One CoL ae, gV rr . ""��� location map ordered from Mapping 7 Z O 6L File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary -�/ 6, 0 PC public hearing date ACTION: CL 4 ©(o BOS public hearing date ACTION: l Signed -copy -of resolutiortf-if-of ordinance, with conditions proffered [if applicable], received from County Administrator's office and given to office manager for placement in the Proffers Notebook. (Note: If rezoning has no proffers, resolution goes in Amendments Without Proffers Notebook.) 9 XZ Action letter mailed to applicant o� �'0 Reference manual and D-base updated File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary (final action) File given to Mapping/GIS to update zoning map Zoning map amended U \Cw0hCommonuracking. rez Revised 05/09/02 4 rul CotWAEMMICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 September 28, 2006 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Attn: Patrick Sowers 117 E. Piccadilly St. Winchester, VA 22601 RE: REZONING #09-06, TASKER WOODS Dear Patrick: This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of September 27, 2006. The above -referenced application was approved to rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District, and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers, for Mixed Use — Commercial and Residential. The subject properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642), east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756), and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522), and are identified with Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76-A-49 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. The proffer that was approved as a part of this rezoning application is unique to this property and is binding regardless of ownership. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted proffer statement for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this rezoning application. Sincerely, ��� 1"'. &&4 Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad Attachment cc: Gene Fisher, Shawnee Magisterial District Supervisor June Wilmot and Robert A. Morris, Shawnee Magisterial District Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue Allden, LLC, 2800 Shirlington Rd., Ste. 803, Arlington, VA 22206 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r �► REZONING APPLICATION #09-06 TASKER WOODS Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: September 19, 2006 Staff Contact: Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Planning Commission: Board of Supervisors Reviewed August 16, 2006 September 6, 2006 September 27, 2006 Action Postponed by applicant Reconuriended Approval Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Perfonnance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 76-A-48A and 76-A-49 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) District. PRESENT USE: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential, church & cemetery South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential B2 (Business General) Vacant M1 (Light Industrial) Industrial & vacant East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 2 PROPOSED USES: Mixed use - commercial and residential REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dent. of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Routes 522, 642 and 756. These routes are the VDOT roadways which have been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Tasker Woods rezoning application dated March 15, 2006 and revised on June 12, 2006 and July 5, 2006 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip General Manual, Sixth Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Fire Marshal: Plan approval recommended. Public Works Department: The revised Tasker Woods rezoning received on June 13, 2006 has adequately addressed our previous comments dated May 25, 2006. Frederick County Inspections: No comment required at this time. Shall continent on site/subdivision reviews. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: I have never heard of the Opequon Urban Development Area. I am just assuming it is a portion of the existing or expanded Urban Development Area east of Stephens City. With regards to the wastewater delivery, is there a reason for not considering elimination of double pumping of taking flow from one pumping station to another, but rather tying into the force main of the second pumping station? I am assuming from the information given, that there will be 323 dwelling units, a mix of single family detached and townhouses, and that there will be approximately 180,000 square feet of commercial property based on the sewer and water flows provided. Sanitation Authority: The Authority shall have adequate water and sewer capacity to service this site. Frederick -Winchester Health Department: Health Department has no objection to the rezoning request as stated. Department of Parks & Recreation: Plan appears to meet open space and recreational unit requirements. During the Master Development Plan review of this project, staff will be looking for the trail to be a minimum of 10' in width and meet the Virginia Department Standards for hard surface trails. The proposed monetary proffer appears to be appropriate to address the impact this development will have on the capital facility needs of the Parks and Recreation Department. • 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 3 Frederick County Public Schools: Based on the information provided, it is anticipated that the proposed 120 single family homes will yield 20 high school students, 17 middle school students, and 47 elementary school students. The 199 townhouses will yield 22 high school students, 24 middle school students, and 62 elementary school students for a total of 192 new students upon build -out. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools serving this area having student enrollments nearing or exceeding the practical capacity for a school. The cumulative impact of this project and others of similar nature, coupled with the number of approved, undeveloped residential lots in the area, will necessitate the future construction of new school facilities to accommodate increased student enrollments. The impact of this rezoning on current and future school needs should be considered during the approval process. Winchester Regional Airport: The proposed rezoning request for Tasker Woods should not impact business operations of the Winchester Regional Airport; therefore, we are not requesting any special conditions for consideration. Frederick County Attorney: (Based on proffer statement dated March 15, 2006) It is my opinion that the Proposed Proffer Statement is generally in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following continents: 1. While the rezoning application is to rezone property from the RA district to the RP and B2 districts, it is noted that the proffers are only conditioned upon approval of the requested RP rezoning. 2. Proffer 1.3 limits the commercial development to 179,000 square feet. The County should determine whether it wants to so limit the commercial development. Further, it should be clarified as to what the square footage requirement applies, preferably having a requirement applied to "usable floor area". Also, there is no requirement in this proffer as to the timing of the commercial development, in relation to the residential development or otherwise. Pursuant to these proffers, the entire residential development could be built out before any commercial development was built and occupied. 3. In Proffer 2.1, it is recommended that this proffer include the provision that the development will be in substantial conformity with the Generalized Development Plan. 4. In Proffer 12.3, it is provided that "the applicant shall construct a southbound right turn lane on White Oak Road". It is not clear from the proffer or the attached Generalized Development Plan where this right turn lane will be constructed, and whether it is going to be constructed on White Oak Road or on Tasker Road. It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific property, or whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the I IRAB. According to the Rural Landmark Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It is also noted that the National Parks Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify any core battlefields that this proposed rezoning would directly impact. Planning Department: Please see attached letter dated May 26, 2006 from Susan K Eddy, Senior Planner. 0 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 4 PlanninI4 & ZoninI4: 1) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephens City Quadrangle) identifies these properties as being zoned A-2 (Agriculture General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use The site is partially located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and entirely located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The properties are within the area of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan, which was adopted in 2005. The plan states that the north portion of the Tasker Woods area is planned for residential use. Single family detached residences are encouraged along Macedonia Church Road to continue the residential pattern established to the west. Single family attached units could be acconunodated further east. Given the relatively flat topography and square shape of the northern portion of the plan area, it could ideally be laid out in a grid pattern. Staff Note: The applicant is proposing a residential pattern generally consistent with the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. Commercial uses are planned for the land immediately north of Tasker Road. The commercial component is envisioned to consist of neighborhood scale commercial uses and office uses. Priority will be given to neighborhood scale cormnercial uses as these will serve the needs of residents and create focal points for the new cormmunity. Strip commercial development is strongly discouraged. Consolidated entrances and inter -parcel corulectors will be encouraged to avoid multiple -entrances along Tasker Road and the new collector road. • 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 5 StaffNote: There is no timing associated with the commercial component of this application. All residences could be built before any commercial development takes place. The applicant is proposing the full range of B2 uses on the property, without a commitment to neighborhood scale commercial uses or a commitment to discouraging a strip center. More attention should be paid to the uses, layout and design of the commercial section. Another component of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan is parks. A central park was proposed in the land use plan to be linked to the rest of the development by trails and sidewalks. Staff Note: A three acre private park is proposed at the northern end of the site. It willbe linked to the development via trails and sidewalks. A further component of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan is design standards. Landscaping is encouraged in the form of street tress and the screening of parking facilities. A limited and coordinated sign package was recommended for the commercial section. Staff Note: The applicant has proffered street trees for the commercial section. Some sign reductions have also been proffered. Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan designates Tasker Road as an improved major collector. It designates Macedonia Church Road/White Oak Road, west of Route 522, as a new major collector. (This is reiterated in the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan.) This translates to a four -lane divided boulevard section, such as is being implemented with Warrior Drive. The idealized intersection design in the Comprehensive Plan (6-15) illustrates appropriate features including raised medians with landscaping, landscaping along the edge of the right-of-way, and sidewalks. (See sketch of Macedonia Church Road.) Staff Note: The applicant is not providing all of the road improvements called for in the Comprehensive Plan. Macedonia Church Road is atpresent a two lane road The applicant is only committed to constructing two additional lanes and a landscaped median for the first 200 feet of Macedonia Church Road west of Route 522. West of that point, left turn lanes will be added to access the church property and the site entrance. (See sketch of Macedonia Church Road) The applicant has agreed to design the full four lane roadway with a landscaped median and provide 80' of right-of-way. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Tasker Road as a short-term designated route. The Tasker Woods Land Use Plan calls for an interconnected system of multipurpose trails and sidewalks through out the development. Staff Note: The applicant is providing trails and sidewalks throughout the development. Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 6 3) Site Suitability/Environment No steep slopes exist on the property. No portion of this site is within the 100-year flood plain according to the Flood Insurance Study Map for Frederick County. U.S.G.S. maps show two streams and three ponds on the property. The applicant has identified three wetlands on the property. The wetlands will be analyzed further at the MDP and site plan stages. Staff note: Protection of the integrity of the ponds, especially during the construction phases, should be considered as part of the proffer statement. The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County, , Vir inia indicates that the soils comprising the subject parcel fall under the Weikert-Berks-Blairton soil association, which is the predominant association on land located east of Interstate 81. The characteristics of this soil type and any implications for site development are manageable through the site engineering process. No soil types on this site are classified as prime fannland soil. 4) Potential Impacts A. Transportation A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for this application on February 2, 2006 using an assessment of background traffic, including growth rates and other planned projects in the area; calculation of trip generation for this development; distribution and assignment of the Tasker Woods generated traffic; and analysis of capacity and level of service for existing and future conditions. An addendum to the original TIA was prepared on July 11, 2006. Using traffic generation figures from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition, the TIA projects that the proposed development will produce 12,846 vehicle trips per day (VPD). The TIA further indicates that the study area roads and intersections have the capacity to accommodate the trips generated by the project at Level of Service "C" conditions or better, given certain road improvements. Some improvements are proposed to be provided by the applicant, some are to be provided by others, and for some it is uncertain who will provide the improvements. • A traffic signal is required at Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road. This is proffered by the applicant. • A traffic signal is required at the intersection of White Oak Road and Tasker Road. This is proffered with the Cedar Meadow rezoning. A southbound right turn lane on White Oak Road is also required. It is unclear who will provide this improvement. • A traffic signal is required at the intersection of Marcel Road, Tasker Road, and the new minor collector. This signal is proffered by the applicant. A southbound left turn lane is required on the new collector road at Tasker Road and a westbound right lane on Tasker Road is required at the new collector road. The applicant is proffering these turn lanes. • A traffic signal is required at the intersection of Route 522 and Tasker Road. This was proffered with the Eastgate Commerce Center rezoning. 0 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 7 • A traffic signal will be provided at the intersection of Route 522 and Clydesdale Drive, by the developers of Canter Estates V. Additional right-of-way will be provided on the portion of Macedonia Church Road that is not a major collector. Staff Note: The applicant should be prepared to provide road improvements to ensure level of service "C" on area roads, including White Oak Road. Other road improvements are sought Yvith this rezoning as per the Comprehensive Policy Plan see comments above. B. Sewer and Water Presently, sewer service is available via an 8" main that travels to the south of this project by a pump station installed adjacent to Tasker Road as a part of the Eastgate project. A new pump station will be needed. Wastewater generated by this project will be transferred to the Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility which is being expanded from 2 to 5 MGD by the FCSA and FWSA. Water supply is provided by way of a 12" water main located along the western boundary of this site which serves as a loop connection along route 522 through Albin to a connection with the 20" transmission main located near the Papermill Road intersection with Route 522. Water demand of this project would be equivalent to its sewer production of 99,600 gallons per day. C. Community Facilities The applicant has proffered $23,290 for each single family detached unit and $17,732 for each single family attached unit to offset the impacts to community facilities. This amount is consistent with the County's Development Impact Model. 5) Proffer Statement — Dated March 15, 2006, latest revision dated September 19, 2006 A) Generalized Development Plan The applicant has proffered a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) dated January 15, 2006 and revised August 16, 2006. It shows the location of the major roads, the location of the recreational facilities, the new church entrance and the iron fence. It also shows the location of the single family attached and detached units. All of the single family detached units are labeled single family small units. B) Land Use Residential development will be limited to 319 units, in a mixture of single family detached and single family attached units. The mix shall be determined at the Master Development Plan (MDP) stage and the projected traffic volume will not exceed 2,931 average daily trips. Building permits will be limited to 90 within any calendar year. Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the site shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 8 Staff note: The mix ofsingle family attached and single family detached uizits must conform to the proffered GDP, in the locations shown on the GDP. There is no timing element for the commercial floorspace. C) Recreation The development will include a community center, a pool, a basketball court, two tot lots, a picnic shelter and ten -foot wide pedestrian/bicycle trail in the location depicted on the GDP. These will count towards the development's required recreational units. Staff Note: The County expectation is that a community center is all enclosed, year round, climate controlled facility. D) Transportation A traffic signal will be placed at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to the occupancy of the 50°i dwelling unit. White Oak Road will realign with Macedonia Church Road. The design and right-of- way for Macedonia Church Road will be provided. The applicant will construct two additional lanes and a landscaped median for the first 200 feet of Macedonia Church Road west of Route 522. West of that point, left turn lanes will be added to access the church property and the site entrance. An iron fence will be provided along the church property and the church entrance consolidated to a single access point. Staff Note: Staff would recommend that the full four lane, landscaped mediast section of Macedonia Church Road be constructed by the applicant. A road will be constructed to link the residential and commercial components of the site, prior to the occupancy of any buildings on the commercial portion of the site. Commercial entrances will be prohibited on Tasker Road. The applicant will enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT to provide a signal at the intersection of Tasker Road and Marcel Drive and two turn lanes at that intersection. E) Commercial Design Standards All buildings in the commercial area will have compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facades along Tasker Road shall be limited to a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality long lasting masonry materials. Street tress will be provided in the conunercial area. F) Commercial Signage Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the single proposed entrance on Tasker Road. Maximum • 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 9 height for all signs on the property shall be 20 feet. Pylon signs shall be prohibited on the property. G) Street Trees Street trees are provided in the commercial portion of the site. H) Horne Owners Association The applicant will establish a start-up field for the Home Owners Association with a lump sum of $2,500 plus $100 for each platted lot. I) Monetary Contribution For each single family detached unit the applicant has proffered: $720 for fire and rescue; $19,189 for schools: $2,136 for parks and recreation; $267 for library; $658 for public safety; and $320 for general government: $23,290 for capital improvements, plus $1,000 for road improvements in the Tasker Road Corridor For each single family attached unit the applicant has proffered: $528 for fire and rescue; $14,618 for schools: $1,634 for parks and recreation; $204 for library; $503 for public safety; and $245 for general government: $17,732 for capital improvements, plus $500 for road improvements in the Tasker Road Corridor STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 09/06/06 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The land use proposed in this application is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, as described in the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. The Tasker Woods Land Use plan, however, includes much more than just the basic land uses. At this time, all road improvements called for in the TIA and in the Comprehensive Policy Plan are not addressed by the applicant and the applicant has made no commitments as to the uses, layout or timing of the commercial component. Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 10 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF THE 09/06/06 MEETING: Two individuals spoke in support of the rezoning proposal. The first, Rev. Jason Duley, Pastor of the Macedonia United Methodist Church, was pleased with the cooperation his church had received from the applicant and was especially pleased with the applicant's proposal to construct a consolidated entranceway for the church. Regarding the four -lane section of road from Route 522 all the way through to White Oak Road, Rev. Duley did not see how they could avoid constructing it because of the increased growth and traffic, but he was concerned the occurrences of cut -through traffic would increase. Rev. Duley also requested that the road in front of his church remain named Macedonia Church Road. The other speaker, a resident of Canter Estates, stated that Canter Estates Homeowners Association had no objections to the proposal. He said Canter Estates residents were pleased the proposed use was residential and were also pleased with the proposed improvements to Macedonia Church Road. He agreed the road name in front of the church should stay as Macedonia Church Road. Commission members were concerned about the inability of Macedonia Church Road to handle existing traffic, especially the intersection at Macedonia Church Road and Route 552, and questioned whether the development could proceed without making Macedonia Church Road a four -lane section. The applicants offered to modify their proffer to construct a four -lane section of Macedonia Church Road, 200 feet in from Route 522. The applicant explained that Macedonia will have two though lanes with a continuous left -turns lane dedicated to church movements and a left -turn lane at their project's main entrance; this will transition back to two lanes at White Oak Road. VDOT representative, Lloyd Ingram, preferred to see the proposed lane design on paper before making a comment. Commission members were pleased with the applicant's overall transportation proffer package, but some of the Connnissioners believed all of Macedonia Church Road, from Route 522 through to White Oak Road, should be constructed by the applicant with either three or four lanes. Their concern was that if it wasn't done by this applicant with this project, they were not sure it could be accomplished any other way. Commission members agreed that the name of the road in front of church should remain as Macedonia Church Road. By a majority vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the rezoning with the applicant's revised proffers and recommended that the road name should remain as Macedonia Church Road. The vote was as follows: YES (TO REC. APPROVAL W/ RE, V. PROFFERS): Mohn, Kerr, Triplett, Kriz, Ours, Thomas, Wilmot, Manuel, Unger NO: Light, Oates, Morris (Note: Commissioner Watt was absent from the meeting.) 0 • Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods September 19, 2006 Page 11 ACTION FOLLOWING THE PLANNING COMMISSION MELTING: The applicant revised the proffer statement to reflect commitments verbally agreed to at the Plarming Commission meeting on September 6, 2006. The main change was to road improvements at Macedonia Church Road. A short stretch (200 feet) of the desired four -lane landscaped median section is now proffered. An additional lane, to get to a three lane section without a median, is now also proffered, although its exact location is unclear. It will generally be in the location of the left turn lanes. It was staff s expectation that the three lane sections would include a median with two lanes on one side of the median and one lane on the other side, with the preferred side to be determined by VDOT. This configuration is not proffered. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 09/27/06 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The land use proposed in this application is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, as described in the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. At this time, the road improvements called for in the TIA and in the Comprehensive Policy Plan are not addressed by the applicant and the applicant has made no commitments as to the uses, layout or timing of the commercial component. Following the required public hearing, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. Macedonia ChuirclToaa oak 'Road 5zz M�aceda►;e C�urc� 'Road Ck %Ao„te ure U*c Oak C4,a (fu;urc 4-taus' donia Projec.* E��saree Church StAre"a II I-Iahc IC1143c0 ea Rou�c 522 9- 95�\\\ mtd►ion SCC+ion as rev Co . Pol"cy i'ton (44C Oak 'Road Mac. C�urCh :wns Road ChurcNn Flnjrvof%ce- pro E n�rance l a►w s yi= n OkA AW:ccan♦ s rroff-off=n.Provc ww c,ats CK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 May 26, 2006 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods Dear Patrick: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for Tasker Woods. This application seeks to rezone 76.97 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District and B2 (Business General) District. Staff s review comments are listed below for your consideration. 1. Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. The site is within the limits of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan (TWLUP), a component of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The plan calls for a mix of residential and commercial uses. The proposed uses are generally consistent with the TWLUP. 2. Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. As the applicant is aware, having been involved in the Comp Plan amendment that expanded the UDA and SWSA in this area, the TWLUP includes much more than just a land use map. The plan includes many land use and design elements that are not addressed in this application. Consider all of the following before this application is submitted: • The residential portion should be interconnected, ideally laid out in a grid pattern; • Neighborhood scale commercial uses are preferred over offices; A neighborhood park is shown on the land -use map in the center of the development; Inter -connected trails and sidewalks; Prohibit individual residential entrances on White Oak Road; • Prohibit commercial entrances on Tasker Road; • Limit commercial entrances on the new collector road; • Save mature trees; Provide street trees; • Landscape screening of parking areas; and i A coordinated, and limited, sign package for the commercial areas. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods May 26, 2006 3. Eastern Road Plan. The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan designates Tasker Road as an improved major collector and designates Macedonia Church Road (north of this site) as a new major collector. Full implementation of the four -lane major collector road design would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to provide any needed right—of—way for this improvement, provide landscaped medians and pave additional lanes. Also, ensure that White Oak Road/Macedonia Church Road is the major collector and provide sufficient right-of-way so that the historic cemetery is not impacted by road widening. Realign the northern bend in Macedonia Church Road to a T-intersection to ensure that traffic flows from White Oak Road to Macedonia Church Road. 4. Entrance. You will need to align the entrance to this project on Macedonia Church Road with the new entrance to Macedonia Methodist Church (see site plan #19-02). This will allow sufficient distance between the entrance and Route 522 and the entrance and White Oak Road. You could consider a roundabout in this general area to improve access and traffic flow. This could also establish a focal point at the entrance to the community. 5. Bike Trail. Tasker Road is identified on the Frederick County Bicycle Plan as a short term destination. Provide a bike trail in this location. In addition, a bike trail has been established on White Oak Road. Continue this bike path to Route 522. See earlier comment 92 on internal trails. 6. Traffic Impact Analysis. The TIA has significantly underestimated the trip generation for this proposal. The applicant has proffered 319 single family units. The County must assume the worst case scenario (for traffic) which would be 319 single family detached houses. The TIA can only model townhouses if townhouses are specifically proffered. Similarly, with the commercial component, the applicant has not restricted the B2 uses on the site. Therefore, the TIA must model 179,000 square feet of retail use. Either the TIA must be revised or the proffer statement must be revised. The County will not accept the combination as currently submitted. 7. Traffic Impact Analysis. TIA figures 3, 5 & 9 are missing the levels of service for a number of intersections. Please include all segments of each intersection. 8. Traffic Impact Analysis. Table 1 - please provide additional information on the trip generation figures for Shenandoah. 9. Traffic Impact Analysis. How can the level of service for the signalized intersection of Tasker Road and White Oak Road and for the signalized Page 3 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods May 26, 2006 intersection of Tasker Road and Route 522 be better after this development (Figure 9) than it was before the development (Figure 5)? 10. Traffic Impact Analysis. As stated in the TIA, level of service C will not be maintained at the intersection of the new collector road and Marcel Drive. The Comprehensive Policy Plan calls for level of service C on roads adjacent to and within new developments. Therefore, this intersection does not meet the criteria of the Comp Plan and is not acceptable. Note: Signalization of the intersection of Clydesdale Drive and Route 522 is proffered by JASBO, Inc. Verify the particulars with VDOT and update the TIA. 11. Proffer Statement — Land Use. The applicant has proffered 319 single family dwelling units. This is the maximum allowed by ordinance, so is redundant as a proffer. Are housing types other than single family homes to be allowed? Is there a proffered split of housing types? (See comment #6 above.) 12. Proffer Statement — Land Use (1.2). 110 dwelling units per year is high. Consider a lower number. Tie the number to lot creation, not building permits. 13. Proffer Statement — Permits & Plan Approval. Proffer 2.1 calls for unified design standards. There are currently no design standards proffered with this application. The county would welcome design standards, as called for in the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan, for both the commercial and residential portions of the site. These could include a focal point, architectural design, building materials, landscaping and signage. 14. Proffer Statement — Parks & Open Space. A central park is clearly called for in the TWLUP. You should be aware that the county is considering public parks as an important feature in the Urban Development Area (UDA). Please work with the Parks and Recreation Department to see if this might be an area suitable for a public park. 15. Proffer Statement — HOA. Consider setting up a start-up fund with seed money. 16. Proffer Statement — Transportation. The improvements called for in proffers 12.2 and 12.3 could be triggered sooner in light of the failing levels of service even before this project is built. The entrance to the Macedonia Church shown on the GDP is not consistent with the new entrance approved with the Macedonia Church Site Plan #19-02. Transportation proffers need to be tied to events that are monitored by the Planriing Department. Dedicate land and bond road improvements at the lot creation stage. Roads should be open to the public at the Page 4 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods May 26, 2006 building permit stage. State an event by which the new collector road will be built from Tasker Road through to Macedonia Church Road. The County would be seeking that road when the residential portion of the site is constructed. 17. Proffer Statement — Transportation. The church property is private property. Improvements to it should not be in the proffer statement. 18. Proffer Statement — GDP. The GDP must clearly show the major collector through road as Macedonia Church Road/White Oak Road. Also, the TWLUP seeks a grid layout for the residential portion of the site. It would be useful to include the street layout on the GDP. 19. Proffer Statement — GDP. The GDP includes a community center, although this is not referenced in the text of the proffer statement. Is this in addition to ordinance requirements? Is this the required community center for single family small units? It would be beneficial to include details on the projects, such as the type and size of center and also a timing element. 20. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Historic Resources Advisory Board, Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Schools, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick -Winchester Health Department, Winchester Regional Airport, Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. The proposed proffers have been forwarded by staff to the Frederick County Attorney. Once attorney comments are received by the Planning Department, they will be forwarded to your office. Attorney comments are required for acceptance of the rezoning application. 21. Maps. In all maps submitted with this application, the parcels subject to this rezoning (76-A-49 & 76-A-48A), two other parcels ((76-A-51 & 76-A-51 C) and a stormwater management pond for Tasker Road are outlined in black. Do not outline any properties that are not part of this rezoning. This causes confusion. Also, all maps incorrectly identify the easternmost section of Macedonia Church Road as White Oak Road. Correct all maps. 22. Adjacent Parcels. The list of all adjacent properties, their owners and the owners' addresses contained errors and is obsolete. For the record, include parcels 76-A-51, 76-A-53, 76-A-48B, 76-A-47A and 76-A-53D and correct the Page 5 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods May 26, 2006 PIN number for 76-A-49E. An accurate list of adjoiners must be submitted with this application before it will be accepted by the Plamiing Department. 23. Other. You are, of course, required to submit a plat with the location of all proposed zoning boundary lines, a copy of the deed to the property, and a statement verifying that taxes have been paid. 24. Fees. The fee for this application includes a $3,000.00 base fee plus $100.00 per acre, and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Thus, a total of $10,747 is due upon submission of the official rezoning application. This is based on fees as of January 27, 2005. Fees may change. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, /)�. Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner SKE/bad cc: Allden, LLC, 2800 Shirlington Rd., Suite 803, Arlington, VA 22206 OAppllvtw. Urban Development Area REZ 9 09, 06 e S WSA Tasker Woods (76-A-48A,49) 0 0.05 01 Miles o.s s 0 r GG_t: 75 A 113'- LEONARD PROPERTY, LL t Dr + ` +'^ 1�FREDERICH COUNTY SCHOOLS i 1 76 - A 90A 40 I ON e '. ( F - , RAY, JANE PETRIE • j: r . Ik PINE, THOMAS J � r • � ` 76 A,.81 sm 9• y ;� F 76 A 103D BOUNTIFUL FARMS LLC ♦ 7 A 47 `a3 7 w M ,� '4 5 m \ ALLDEN. LLc. 70 A 49, m t > DAa 7'6 � :FE, HUI SUN� sJi Ig A 49C lh 76k*49A 6 L , —R. DAVID S 6 PAMELA h /) 0 6 ..A 48A 76 A 51 g A 104C B q o rsa *7F 62 'o A 51C 64 16 S A6 P E 6 76 A 53D ` �'' 76 A 53 ° n a 608 HERITAGE PLACE. L C ✓''�, ,� s ARIGHTSRL,N. .P �• 49 1 76 'A 53B Y FRMARCEL DRIVE!LLC • - ,*' ,�6. A Z w ••SMEN VALLEY, LLC7 ` d +. �, ,r' • ('. �� ASS*.. i; C W _ 76 A 42 � �� 76 A�53H - w„ 76 A ARGEh' qt E-.ZAfiE'n R S"EE Y \ q.,WRIGHT RUN P A 11 * 76 A 53 4 76 A 53' O, YPtlLdllOfl • Urban Development Area REZ 9 09, 06 �swsA e Tasker Woods ( 76 - A - 48A, 49 ) 0 0.05 0.1 0.2 Miles � ]l �- �-�- ww op-JIF . ,got ;. �i . • err _ �� ♦. ,�A ea wall •�!��/jj►��►1t . BOUNTIFUL FARMS LLC 11► r��1�� ♦ ,jrr �����I•'�'� 1IF �►�•�� , �--� LEE, MU1 SUN FYI CA rr►rrw Q 1��,• `� Ile t � mam -J r�Q q� mam oAppt—tiae REZ # 09 - 06 - pan D—lo,—nt k.a - M1 (InO— I. Llgnt Did"G) e �SWSA M3(IMuatrul. Geneal Deo- Tasker Woods 2onlny - MH1 (Mobile Home Gommundy pstrut) 81 (8---. NelI Dutnct) _ MS (Medial 51pport Dal ( 76 - A - 48A, 49 ) BP (B—nese. General pstnct) • Re (Resldennal, Planned Comm-Ity DWW) 0 0.0$ 0.1 02 B3 B-ne-. Industrial Transition Dlstnot ( ) • R5 (Residential Recreational Communey Dlslrkl) • EM (Estracnw ManWactunnp Dlstrld) RA (Rwal Waaa Distr¢t) Miles • HE (Hpner Edna DntrKl) RP (Rovdennal Performance pWnd) • o^' LIKE 1�w a Nam• FARMS BOUNTIFUL LLC y n D ALLDEN,LLC 76 A 49 > > ar A? � Q / m 9 7 6 A 41 � 7g A DABAr, DAw76 A 68 o N LEE, NUI SUN :r an49C A 1 << 1 76 A 104D a BF r 76 A 49EL � LEHR DAVID S i PAMELA BA? Ile i 9 4 9 �! i�, ALLDEN. LLC 76 / A 48A 76 A 51 76 A 104 j C / 4 44 1 rSRU,y (a STROSNIDER DONALD UESUE 76 p 62 76 A 51C45 1� a / p' der 'fit y ppp A6 t �,�, 60P 622 76 A 53D °- 76 A 53 a 60B 9 (' HERITAGE PLACE, L C WRIGHTS RUN, �P / 76 A 53B / P 54 FIR MARCEL DRIVE. LLC I 76 P 55 SHEN VALLEY, LLC 76 A 42 76 A 53H <� 76 A 56 s SARGENT, M EUZABETH TRUSTEE i / / .q WRIGHTS RUN, LP S�F 76 A 53 75 A 113 rl LEONARD PROPERTY, LLC 1 ,6 76 A 53 , /� S3F Co REZ �iFL 09 - 06 • 0 Urban Development Area ^. ;¢'^ Industrial "' Tasker Woods 40SVVSA Institutional Long Rang. Land Use Recreation e (7- A - 48A, 49 ) Rural Community Center ,� Historic Residential ® Mixed -Use 0 005 5 0.1 0.2 Business ® Planned Unit Development Miles • 0 • Gr w Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Name) (Phone) (Address) 2800 ShirlinQton Road, Ste 803 Arlington, VA 22206 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument Year: 2004 Instrument Number: 4069 Deed Book on Page and is described as Parcel: 49 & 48A Lot: —Block: A Section: 76 Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Charles Maddox, Patrick Sowers, John Callow, Clay Athey, Ron Mislowsky (Phone) 540-667-2139 *.,�,ddress) 117 E. Piccidilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 10 act as my true and lawful attomey-in-fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including X Rezoning (including proffers) _ Conditional Use Permits X Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) X Subdivision X Site Plan My attorney -in -fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or tt it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (we) have hereto set my (our) hand aAseal�iis 27 day "nu, 2006, Signature(s State of Virginia, City/Ceiu;c of (,(l (_ / I(- / 1T J YA f 10 Wit: I,a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and ha acknowledged the same be f e e in the jurisdiction aforesaid this QN day of Zuv, 206. ��TTT� I iRl31r j ,3 U "y �p ssion Expires: �otaryPublic =� 1:�MOi�r•'•.� _'per rr REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA To be co��spleted by Planning Staff po ` 'Fee Amount Paid$. 3. Zoning Amendment Number . L? Date Received PC Hearing Date : BOS Hearing Date The following information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicants: Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Telephone: (540) 667.2139 Address: 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 2. Property Owner (if different than above) Name: Allden, LLC Telephone: 703.820.2500 Address: 2800 Shirlington Rd, Ste 803 Arlington, VA 22206 3. Contact person(s) if other than above Name: Patrick Sowers Telephone: (540) 667.2139 4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location Map Plat Deed of property Verification of taxes paid Agency Comments Fees Impact Analysis Statement Proffer Statement 1 • 5. The Code of Virl4inia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Taylor -Grace, LLC (Denver Quinnlley, Principal) Hudmare II, LLC (Allan Hudson, Principal) 6. A) Current Use of the Property: B) Proposed Use of the Property: Vacant SF Detached, SF Attached and Commercial 7. Adjoining Property: SEE ATTACHED. PARCEL ID NUMBER USE ZONING 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers). North of Tasker Road (Route 642), East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). 2 Tasker Woods Property Owner Designation (within V2 mile radius of property) Tax ID # Name Address Zoning Use 76-A-31A Macedonia Cemetery Assoc. 1941 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Religious 76-A-32 Macedonia Methodist Church 1941 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Religious 76-A-86 George E. Bagley 2000 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-85 Lane M. Reed 2456 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49D Isabelle Kastak 2490 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-84 Harry E & Phyliss J. Saville 2492 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49B Minne Mae Butler 2584 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49C Roger L. & Joan F. Strosnider 2606 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49A David S. & Pamela B. Lehr 2678 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-51 C Clifton R. Strosnider 173 Armel Road, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-48 Betty J. Tinsman 1804 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-47B William & Loretta Heflin 113 Tadpole Lane, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-36 Richard & Catherine Palmer 1789 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-35 Wayne E. Wilkins 1847 Macedonia Church Road, White post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-34 Gary E. Whitacre 1861 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-5-55 Glen M. & Hattie P. Borrer 1873 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-5-59 Elizabeth Properties, LC P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential 76-5-61 Elizabeth Properties, LC P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential 76-5-62 Elizabeth Properties, LC P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential • • • • 12. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully snake application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby the best of my Applicant(s) iying materials are true and accurate to Date S �< t� Date 5 L241b(,- C '"w 283.31'38•E 418.17 �rySE / ' S79.45'10"E 100.08 i i •ryi ryy/ 2� i RA TO RP 4 ;/N63°05'01"W 17.44 6 0.2 81 ACRES ' O� \ r TOTAL AREA: 79.178 ACRES LDE TABLE LDE BEARING LENGTH Ll S30'36'41'E 60w L2 S86.14'48'E 123-W L3 S06.40'58'E 30.61' L4 S23.50'51'E 87.30' L3 S43.41'14'E 3L66' L6 S13.31'42'V 29.43' L7 S80.15112•E 69.53' CURVE TABLE CURVE I DELTA I RABBIS I LENGTH I TANGENT I BEARING ICHDRD Cl 190.00'00' 1 .00 621 40A0 SOS'38'111'E 56.57 C2 89'3979' 40.00 62.83 40�00 N84.21'20'E 56.57 C3 1 77.20'07• 1 126,40 1 170-61 IOL13 I S61.46'38'V I 157.95 C4 37.20'2B'1 27953 1 IBL53 94.12 1 N79.36'36•E 1 78.33 C5 1 4.58'20' 1 183.50 1 15.92 7.97 1 N56.10.24'E 1 15.92 RA TO B2d i 8.897 ACRES J 50.38'41"E 124.74 -82.12_Sq•W=49.28_ i TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc II` \ W I ZONING BOUNDARIES 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 p a VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 Q FREDERICK COUNTY, KRG/N/A REZONING APPLICATION #09-06 TASKER WOODS Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: July 31, 2006 Staff Contact: Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: August 16, 2006 Pending Board of Supervisors: September 13, 2006 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 58.08 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.89 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 76.97 acres, with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 76-A-48A and 76-A-49 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) District. PRESENT USE: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) South: RA (Rural Areas) B2 (Business General) M1 (Light Industrial) East: RA (Rural Areas) West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential, church & cemetery Use: Residential Vacant Industrial & vacant Use: Residential Use: Residential — Tasker Woods Rezoning #09-06 July 31, 2006 Page 2 PROPOSED USES: Mixed use - commercial and residential REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dent. of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Routes 522, 642 and 756. These routes are the VDOT roadways which have been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the Tasker Woods rezoning application dated March 15, 2006 and revised on June 12, 2006 and July 5, 2006 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip General Manual, Sixth Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Fire Marshal: Plan approval recommended. Public Works Department: The revised Tasker Woods rezoning received on June 13, 2006 has adequately address our previous comments dated May 25, 2006. Frederick County Inspections: No comment required at this time. Shall comment on site/subdivision reviews. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: I have never heard of the Opequon Urban Development Area. I am just assuming it is a portion of the existing or expanded Urban Development Area east of Stephens City. With regards to the wastewater delivery, is there a reason for not considering elimination of double pumping of taking flow from one pumping station to another, but rather tying into the force main of the second pumping station? I am assuming from the information given, that there will be 323 dwelling units, a mix of single family detached and townhouses, and that there will be approximately 180,000 square feet of commercial property based on the sewer and water flows provided. Sanitation Authority: The Authority shall have adequate water and sewer capacity to service this site. Frederick -Winchester Health Uepartment: Health Department has no objection to the rezoning request as stated. Department of Parks & Recreation: Plan appears to meet open space and recreational unit requirements. During the Master Development Plan review of this project, staff will be looking for the trail to be a minimum of 10' in width and meet the Virginia Department Standards for hard surface trails. The proposed monetary proffer appears to be appropriate to address the impact this development will have on the capital facility needs of the Parks and Recreation Department. 9 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods July 31, 2006 Page 3 Frederick County Public Schools: Based on the information provided, it is anticipated that the proposed 120 single family homes will yield 20 high school students,17 middle school students, and 47 elementary school students. The 199 townhouses will yield 22 high school students, 24 middle school students, and 62 elementary school students for a total of 192 new students upon build -out. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools serving this area having student enrollments nearing or exceeding the practical capacity for a school. The cumulative impact of this project and others of similar nature, coupled with the number of approved, undeveloped residential lots in the area, will necessitate the future construction of new school facilities to accommodate increased student enrollments. The impact of this rezoning on current and future school needs should be considered during the approval process. Winchester Regional Airport: The proposed rezoning request for Tasker Woods should not impact business operations of the Winchester Regional Airport; therefore, we are not requesting any special conditions for consideration. Frederick County Attorney: (Based on proffer statement dated March 15, 2006) It is my opinion that the Proposed Proffer Statement is generally in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following comments: 1. While the rezoning application is to rezone property from the RA district to the RP and B2 districts, it is noted that the proffers are only conditioned upon approval of the requested RP rezoning. 2. Proffer 1.3 limits the commercial development to 179,000 square feet. The County should determine whether it wants to so limit the commercial development. Further, it should be clarified as to what the square footage requirement applies, preferable having a requirement applied to "usable floor area". Also, there is no requirement in this proffer as to the timing of the commercial development, in relation to the residential development or otherwise. Pursuant to these proffers, the entire residential development could be built out before any commercial development was built and occupied. 3. In Proffer 2.1, it is recommended that this proffer include the provision that the development will be in substantial conformity with the Generalized Development Plan. 4. In Proffer 12.3, it is provided that "the applicant shall construct a southbound right turn lane on White Oak Road". It is not clear from the proffer or the attached Generalized Development Plan where this right turn lane will be constructed, and whether it is going to be constructed on White Oak Road or on Tasker Road. It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific property, or whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. According to the Rural Landmark Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It is also noted that the National Parks Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify any core battlefields that his proposed rezoning would directly impact. Planning Department: Please see attached letter dated May 26, 2006 from Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner. Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods NOT CURRENT July 31, 2006 Page 4 Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Stephens City Quadrangle) identify these properties as being zoned A-2 (Agriculture General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Land Use The site is partially located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and entirely located within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The properties are within the area of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan, which was adopted in 2005. The plan states that the north portion of the Tasker Woods area is planned for residential use. Single family detached residences are encouraged along Macedonia Church Road to continue the residential pattern established to the west. Single family attached units could be accommodated further east. Given the relatively flat topography and square shape of the northern portion of the plan area, it could ideally be laid out in a grid pattern. Staff Note: The applicant is proposing a residential pattern generally consistent with the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. The grid pattern called for in the plan appears to be provided in the townhouse section, but not in the single family sections. The applicant should consider utilizing the grid pattern throughout the residential portion of the project. Commercial uses are planned for the land immediately north of Tasker Road. The commercial component is envisioned to consist of neighborhood scale commercial uses and office uses. Priority will be given to neighborhood scale commercial uses as these will serve the needs of residents and create focal points for the new community. Strip commercial development is strongly discouraged. Consolidated entrances and inter -parcel connectors will be encouraged to avoid multiple -entrances along Tasker Road and the new collector road. 0 Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods July 31, 2006 Page 5 • OT Cu Staff Note: There is no timing associated with the commercial component of this application. All residences could be briilt before any commercial development takes place. The applicant is proposing the full range of B2 uses on the property, without a commitment to neighborhood scale commercial uses or a commitment to discouraging a strip center. More attention should be paid to the layout and design of the commercial section. Another component of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan is parks. A central park was proposed in the land use plan to be linked to the rest of the development by trails and sidewalks. Staff Note: A three acre private park is proposed at the northern end of the site. It will be linked to the development via trails and sidewalks. A further component of the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan is design standards. Landscaping is encouraged in the form of street tress and the screening of parking facilities. A limited and coordinated sign package was recommended for the commercial section. Staff Note: There is not a commitment to landscaping in this application. Some sign reductions have been proffered Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan designates Tasker Road as an improved major collector. It designates Macedonia Church Road/White Oak Road, west of Route 522, as a new major collector. (This is reiterated in the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan.) This translates to a four -lane divided boulevard section, such as is being implemented with Warrior Drive. The idealized intersection design in the Comprehensive Plan (6-15) illustrates appropriate features including raised medians with landscaping, landscaping along the edge of the right-of-way, and sidewalks. Staff Note: The applicant is not providing the road improvements called for in the Comprehensive Plan. There is no evidence in the proffer statement that the applicant will be providing a four -lane, boulevard section of road for the major collector roads. The applicant will also need to provide road efficiency buffers, consistent with a major collector road The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Tasker Road as a short-term designated route. The Tasker Woods Land Use Plan calls for an interconnected system of multipurpose trails and sidewalks through out the development. Staff Note: While providing trails within the development, the applicant is not providing a bike path on Tasker Road. 3) Site Suitability/Environment No steep slopes exist on the property. No portion of this site is within the 100-year flood plain L� • Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods July 31, 2006 Page 6 according to the Flood Insurance Study Map for Frederick County. U.S.G.S. maps show two streams and three ponds on the property. The applicant has identified three wetlands on the property. The wetlands will be further analyzed further at the MDP and site plan stages. Staff note: Protection of the integrity of the ponds, especially during the construction phases, should be considered as part of the proffer statement. The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia indicates that the soils comprising the subject parcel fall under the Weikert-Berks-Blairton soil association, which is the predominant association on land located east of Interstate 81. The characteristics of this soil type and any implications for site development are manageable through the site engineering process. No soil types on this site are classified as prime farmland soil. 4) Potential Impacts A. Transportation A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for this application on February 2, 2006 using an assessment of background traffic, including growth rates and other planned projects in the area; calculation of trip generation for this development; distribution and assignment of the Tasker Woods generated traffic; and analysis of capacity and level of service for existing and future conditions. An addendum to the original TIA was prepared on July 11, 2006. Using traffic generation figures from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, 7ch Edition, the TIA projects that the proposed development will produce 12,846 vehicle trips per day (VPD). The TIA further indicates that the study area roads and intersections have the capacity to accommodate the trips generated by the project at Level of Service "C" conditions or better, given certain road improvements. Some improvements are proposed to be provided by the applicant, some are to be provided by others, and for some it is uncertain who will provide the improvements. • A traffic signal is required at Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road. This is proffered by the applicant. • A traffic signal is required at the intersection of White Oak Road and Tasker Road. This is proffered with the Cedar Meadow rezoning. A southbound right turn lane on White Oak Road is also required. It is unclear who will provide this improvement. • A traffic signal is required at the intersection of Marcel Road, Tasker Road, and the new minor collector. This signal is proffered by the applicant. A southbound left lane is required on the new collector road at Tasker Road. The applicant has not proffered this improvement. A westbound right lane on Tasker Road is required at the new collector road. The applicant has not proffered this improvement. • A traffic signal is required at the intersection of Route 522 and Tasker Road. This was proffered with the Eastgate Commerce Center rezoning. • A traffic signal will be provided at the intersection of Route 522 and Clydesdale Drive, by the developers of Canter Estates V. ,NUT CURRENT Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods July 31, 2006 Page 7 Staff Note: The applicant should be prepared to provide road improvements to insure level of service "C" on area roads. Other road improvements are sought with this rezoning as per the Comprehensive Policy Plan (see comments above). Minor errors in the TIA levels of service should be corrected. B. Sewer and Water Presently sewer service is available via an 8" main that travels to the south of this project by a pump station installed adjacent to Tasker Road as a part of the Eastgate project. A new pump station will be needed. Wastewater generated by this project will be transferred to the Parking Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility which is being expanded from 2 to 5 MGD by the FCSA and FWSA. Water supply is provided by way of a 12" water main located along the western boundary of this site which serves as a loop connection along route 522 through Albin to a connection with the 20" transmission main located near the Papermill Road intersection with Route 522. Water demand of this project would be equivalent to its sewer production of 99,600 gallons per day. C. Community Facilities The applicant has proffered $23,290 for each single family detached unit and $17,732 for each single family attached unit to offset the impacts to community facilities. This amount is consistent with the County's Development Impact Model. 5) Proffer Statement — Dated March 15, 2006 and Revised June 12, 2006, July 5, 2006 and July 21, 2006 A) Generalized Development Plan The applicant has proffered a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) dated June 1, 2006. It shows the location of the major roads, the location of the recreational facilities, and location of the single family attached and detached units. B) Land Use Residential development will be limited to 319 units, in a mixture of single family detached and single family attached units. The mix shall be determined at the Master Development Plan (MDP) stage and the projected traffic volume will not exceed 2,931 average daily trips. No more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued occupancy certificates within any calendar year. Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the site shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. Staff note: The mix of singlefamily attached and single family detached units must conform to the proffered GDP, in the locations shown on the GDP. Staff would prefer to tie the phasing to building permits. There is no timing element for the commercial Jloorspace. C� Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods July 31, 2006 Page 8 C) Recreation The development will include a community center, a pool, a basketball court, two tot lots, a picnic shelter and ten -foot wide pedestrian/bicycle trail in the location depicted on the GDP. These will count towards the development's required recreational units. Staff Note: This proffer requires a timing element. Clarification on the community center is requested The County expectation is that a community center is an enclosed, year round, climate controlled facility. Proffers generally indicate that the 10 foot -wide trail will be asphalt. D) Transportation A traffic signal will be placed at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to the occupancy of the 50`h dwelling unit. Staff note: Staff prefers that the proffer be tied to the 50'h building permit. White Oak Road will realign with Macedonia Church Road, and a major collector road constructed from Macedonia Church Road to Route 522. This will include an iron fence along the church property and consolidation of the church entrance to a single access point. Eighty feet of right-of-way will be provided for this road. Staff Note: This proffer requires a timing element. The proffer does not clearly define the cross section of the road to be built. A single church access was already designated when the new church site plan was approved in 2002. This access point does not align with the entrance to the proposed development. Staff would recommend that the development entrance align with the church entrance. To protect the integrity of the cemetery, the iron fence should also be provided along the frontage of the cemetery property. A road will be constructed to link the residential and commercial components of the site, prior to the occupancy of any buildings on the commercial portion of the site. Commercial entrances will be prohibited on Tasker Road. The applicant will enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT to provide a signal at the intersection of Tasker Road and Marcel Drive. Staff note: Other road improvements are necessitated by this rezoning. (See transportation analysis above.) E) Commercial Design Standards All buildings in the commercial area will have compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facades along Tasker Road shall be limited to a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality long lasting masonry materials. • � �pT G����" Rezoning #09-06 — Tasker Woods July 31, 2006 Page 9 F) Commercial Signage Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the single proposed entrance on Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs on the property shall be 20 feet. Pylon signs shall be prohibited on the property. Staff note: Proffer 12.6 prevents commercial entrances on Tasker Road, so it is unclear what entrance the signage proffer is referencing. G) Monetary Contribution For each single family detached unit the applicant has proffered: $720 for fire and rescue; $19,189 for schools: $2,136 for parks and recreation; $267 for library; $658 for public safety; and $320 for general government: $23,290 for capital improvements, plus $1,000 for road improvements in the Tasker Road Corridor For each single family attached unit the applicant has proffered: $528 for fire and rescue; $14,618 for schools: $1,634 for parks and recreation; $204 for library; $503 for public safety; and $245 for general government: $17,732 for capital improvements, plus $500 for road improvements in the Tasker Road Corridor STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 08/02/06 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The land use proposed in this application is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, as described in the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. The Tasker Woods Land Use plan, however, includes much more than just the basic land uses. All aspects of the plan should be considered, particularly design standards and road improvements. At this time, all road improvements called for in the TIA and in the Comprehensive Policy Plan are not addressed by the applicant. •uolssnuuuoj MquUVId ail; Aq paslvr MOROJ JJn ssaippn Ja;nn apn o; paivaDa aq pinoys;unall n ayL •a;nl.r o.M n aq p/noM not;nail n uluo ai spy; zftqula3uo3 s osl"a ns o p vog ati; o; uolssltuuioj auiuuvld aril AV uol;npuaululoaaa n r,rvanatl 3ilqna n joj ;uaauarin as ayl ulMollo,- 01 a$led 90OZ `i£ Xinf spooM 131sUl — 90-60# Ouiuoza-d ��n� yore AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: September 6, 2006 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: September 27, 2006 ❑ APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING #09-06 OF TASKER WOODS WHEREAS, Rezoning 909-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use, was considered. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642), east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522), in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers (PINS) 76- A-48A and 76-A-49. WHEREAS, the Plamiing Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on September 6, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on September 27, 2006; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District. Totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use, as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRes. 430-06 This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 27th day of September, 2006 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Barbara E. Van Osten Nay Gary Dove Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Philip A. Lemieux Aye A COPY ATTEST John R. Ri y, Jr. Frederick County Administrator Jay E. Tibbs (For John R. Riley, Jr.) Deputy County Administrator PDRes. 430-06 Tasker Woods P�offe statement v �T9 2006 PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ. # al.ob : RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) 60.281 acres +/- and B2 (General Business) 18.897 acres +/- PROPERTY: 79.178 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcels 76-A-48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Allden, LLC APPLICANT: Allden, LLC PROJECT NAME: Tasker Woods ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 15, 2006 REVISION DATE(S): June 12, 2006 July 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 16, 2006 August 18, 2006 September 13,2006 September 19, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised August 16, 2006 (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Page 1 of 8 9 11 Tacker Wooer Proffer Statement 2. 4 LAND USE: 1.1 Residential development on the Property shall not exceed 319 units. The mixture of single family detached and attached units shall be designated at the time of Master Development Plan and shall not generate more than 2,931 average daily trips (ADT). 1.2 The. project shall be developed pursuant to an annualized phasing plan. Building permits for no more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued within any calendar year. 1.3 Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the Property shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND PLAN APPROVALS: 2.1 The Property shall be developed as one single and unified development in accordance with applicable ordinances, regulations, and design standards, this Tasker Woods Proffer Statement, and in substantial conformity with the GDP as approved by the Board. FIRE & RESCUE: 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $720.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $528.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. SCHOOLS: 4.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $19,189.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 4.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $14,618.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. PARKS & OPEN SPACE: 5.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $2,136.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. Page 2 of 8 Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 5.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1,634.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5.3 Prior to issuance of the 100`h building permit the Applicant shall construct a community center, including a 2,400 square foot pool and full basketball court, in the location depicted on the GDP. Other recreational improvements shall include a minimum of two tot lots and a picnic shelter in the locations depicted on the GDP. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 5.4 The Applicant shall construct a ten foot asphalt public hiker -biker trail in the locations depicted on the GDP. Along the Property frontage on Tasker Road and the portion of Macedonia Church Road identified as a major collector said trail shall be constructed in lieu of the adjacent sidewalk. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. LIBRARIES: 6.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $267.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 6.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $204.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY: 7.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $658.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 7.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $503.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. S. GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 8.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $320.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 8.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $245.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. Page 3 of 8 Tasker Wooer Proffer Statement 9. CREATION OF HOMEOWNERS' AND PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION: 9.1 The residential development shall be made subject to a homeowners' association (hereinafter "HOA") that shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance and repair of all common areas, including any conservation areas that may be established in accordance herewith not dedicated to the County or others, for each area subject to their jurisdiction, and shall be provided such other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations or as may be required for such HOA herein. 9.2 In addition to such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned, an HOA shall have title to and responsibility for (i) all common open space areas not otherwise dedicated to public use, (ii) common buffer areas located outside of residential lots; (iii) convnon solid waste disposal programs by a commercial collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of any street, perimeter, or road buffer areas, all of which buffer areas shall be located within easements to be granted to the HOA if platted within residential or other lots, or otherwise granted to the HOA by appropriate instrument, (v) responsibility for payment for maintenance of streetlights and (vi) maintenance of BMP's and stormwater conveyance channels. 9.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund for the Tasker Woods HOA that will include an initial lump sun payment of $2,500.00 by the Applicant and an additional payment of $100.00 for each platted lot within the Tasker Woods community of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the Tasker Woods HOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the Tasker Woods HOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Document and Deed of Dedication that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the Applicant to the Tasker Woods HOA. The start up funds for the Tasker Woods HOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. 10. WATER & SEWER: 10.1 The Applicant shall be responsible for connecting the Property to public water and sewer, and for constructing all facilities required for such connection. All water and sewer infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. Page 4 of 8 Stormwater management and Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Property shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations, First Ed. 1999, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 which results in the highest order of stormwater control in existing Virginia law at the time of construction of any such facility. Transportation improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the study entitled "A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods," prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associated, dated Februray 2, 2006 with addendum dated July 11, 2006 (the "TIA"). The Applicant shall privately fund all transportation improvements required of this project. The Applicant shall install or bond a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to issuance of the 50`h building permit unless otherwise directed by Frederick County and/or VDOT. The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per single family, detached dwelling and $500 per single family, attached dwelling for transportation improvements to the Tasker Road corridor upon the issuance of a building permit for each unit. The Applicant shall design Macedonia Church Road as a four lane roadway with landscaped median from the road's intersection with White Oak Road to the intersection with Front Royal Pike. The Applicant shall construct Macedonia Church Road from its intersection with Front Royal Pike as a four lane roadway with a landscaped median for a minimum distance of 200 feet prior to transitioning to a three lane section that then transitions into a two lane section that aligns with the existing two lane section of unproved White Oak Road at Canter Estates. Said roadway shall also include turn lanes as directed by VDOT. Said improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of the 50`h building permit. Improvements to Macedonia Church Road shall also include the construction of an iron fence along a portion of the frontage of the Macedonia Church property and consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point as depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall dedicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot right of way to allow full implementation of a major collector roadway between existing White Oak Road and Front Royal Pike that will not negatively impact the existing graveyard at Macedonia Church. (See 1 on GDP) Direct access to individual lots from the portion of Macedonia Church Road designated as a major collector shall be prohibited. • E Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 12.6 Access to commercial portions of the Property shall be provided via the future roadway connecting the commercial and residential portions of the property as indicated on the GDP. Said connection between residential and commercial portions of the Property shall be made prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. Commercial entrances on Tasker Road shall be prohibited. 12.7 The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation that is binding for a period of five years from the date of final rezoning approval with an option for an additional five years for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Marcel Drive and the proposed entrance on Tasker Road. In addition, the Applicant shall be responsible through said agreement, for the installation of a Southbound left tun lane on the proposed internal collector road as well as a westbound right turn lane on Tasker Road at the subject intersection. If or when, in the opinion of VDOT, a traffic signal and/or the turn lanes are required, the Applicant shall provide funds including any necessary bond to construct improvements at said intersection. 12.8 The Applicant shall dedicate 27 feet of right of way from the center line of the portion of Macedonia Church Road not identified as a major collector prior to issuance of the 50`h building permit. 13. HISTORIC MARKER 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Church that notes the historical significance of Macedonia Church. 14. COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 14.1 All buildings within the commercial area of the Property shall be constructed using compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facsade in addition to any facade fronting Tasker Road of all commercial buildings shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. 15. COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE 15.1 Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the proposed internal collector road entrance at Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs located on the Property shall be 20 feet. 15.2 Pylon style signs shall be prohibited on the Property. Page 6 of 8 Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 16. STREET TREES 16.1 The Applicant shall locate street trees along the road frontage of both Tasker Road and the proposed internal minor collector road within the commercial land bay of the Property to enhance the visual characteristics of both corridors. Said street trees shall be planted a maximum of 40' apart and shall be planted prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 7 of 8 0 9 Tasker Woods Proffer Statement Respe( Title: STATE OF VIRGINLA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 'n-) . K , 2006, by no n v-a r My commission expires -30 - 66 %%%%`TINq+�'`'�r �J r Notary Public 1110 S�Z� OF s; � � w � w ' �p ••.RGIN�P: G Page 8 of 8 �� �O IRON FENCE COMMUNITY CENTER — & POCKET PARK (3 Ac) SF DET CONSOLIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TO SINGLE ACCESS PINT cl � l\ 4 �� vv � ❑ r SF ATTALK (T Q. V 1 \ ��.. ..- (PUBLIC) q \ 60' R/d r REZONE RA - "'TO Be, Acres j tlQDSED USE, COMMERCIAL TASKER WOODS II: \ � Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc o �`,• GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 Cb O °j % � FREDERICK CDUN7Y, lilRG/NG4 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 Patton Harris Rust & 0sociates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. R A 117 East Piccadilly Street l Winchester, Virginia 22601 PH T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To: 0rganizationlCompany: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: cc: Susan Ed, Frederick Ron Mislowsky, P. , September 14, 200&� Tasker Woods NOT Gt1 Ij►� IIT Memorandum Enclosed please find the revised proffer statement for Tasker Woods. Item 12.4 has been revised to reflect the verbal commitment made at the Planning Commission meeting Monday that certain improvements over and above the two lane road previously proffered will be made. The scope of the improvements is detailed in Para.12.4. Please call if you have any questions. SEP 1 4 2006 j'� U'1 c u-vv ! -- Tacker Foods PrOr Statement PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ. # : RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) 60.281 acres +/- and B2 (General Business) 18.897 acres +/- PROPERTY: 79.178 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcels 76-A 48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property') RECORD OWNER Allden, LLC APPLIC.AN`I': Allden, LLC PROJECT NAME: Tasker Woods ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 15, 2006 REVISION DATE(S): June 12, 2006 July 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 16, 2006 August 18, 2006 September 13, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property'), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised August 16, 2006 (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Pagel of 8 SEP 1 4 2000" NoT CUREENT Tacker l!%ode Prgyer Statement LAND USE: 1.1 Residential development on the Property shall not exceed 319 units. The mixture of single family detached and attached units shall be designated at the time of Master Development Plan and shall not generate more than 2,931 average dailytrips (ADT). 1.2 The project shall be developed pursuant to an annualized phasing plan. Building permits for no more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued within any calendar year. 1.3 Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the Property shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. 2. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND PLAN APPROVALS: 2.1 The Property shall be developed as one single and unified development in accordance with applicable ordinances, regulations, and design standards, this Tasker Woods Proffer Statement, and in substantial conformity with the GDP as approved by the Board. FIRE & RESCUE: 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $720.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $528.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. SCHOOLS: 4.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $19,189.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 4.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $14,618.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. PARKS & OPEN SPACE: 5.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $2,136.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. Page 2 of 8 L NOT CURFEi . 'Parker I['"oodr Proffer Statement 5.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1,634.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5.3 Prior to issuance of the 100`h building permit the Applicant shall construct a community center, including a 2,400 square foot pool and full basketball court, in the location depicted on the GDP. Other recreational improvements shall include a nvnimum of two tot lots and a picnic shelter in the locations depicted on the GDP. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 5.4 The Applicant shall construct a ten foot asphalt public pedestrian -bicycle trail in the locations depicted on the GDP. Along the Property frontage on Tasker Road and the portion of Macedonia Church Road identified as a major collector said trail shall be constructed in lieu of the adjacent sidewalk Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 6. LIBRARIES: 6.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $267.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 6.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $204.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. PUBLIC SAFETY: 7.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $658.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 7.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $503.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 8.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $320.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 8.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $245.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. Page 3 of 8 POT CORENT 7 aJker 16"oods Proffer Stalemenl CREATION OF HOMEOWNERS' AND PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION: 9.1 The residential development shall be made subject to a homeowners' association (hereinafter "HOA') that shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance and repair of all common areas, including any conservation areas that may be established in accordance herewith not dedicated to the County or others, for each area subject to their jurisdiction, and shall be provided such other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations or as may be required for such HOA herein. 9.2 In addition to such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned, an HOA shall have title to and responsibility for (i) all common open space areas not otherwise dedicated to public use, (ii) common buffer areas located outside of residential lots; (iii) common solid waste disposal programs by a commercial collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of any street, perimeter, or road buffer areas, all of which buffer areas shall be located within easements to be granted to the HOA if platted within residential or other lots, or otherwise granted to the HOA by appropriate instrument, (v) responsibility for payment for maintenance of streetlights and (vi) maintenance of BMP's and stormwater conveyance channels. 9.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund for the Tasker Woods HOA that will include an initial lump sum payment of $2,500.00 by the Applicant and an additional payment of $100.00 for each platted lot within the Tasker Woods community of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the Tasker Woods HOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the Tasker Woods HOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Document and Deed of Dedication that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the Applicant to the Tasker Woods HOA. The start up funds for the Tasker Woods HOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. 10. WATER & SEWER: 10.1 The Applicant shall be responsible for connecting the Property to public water and sewer, and for constructing all facilities required for such connection. All water and sewer infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. Page 4 of 8 Tasker [Foods Proffer Statement 11. ENVIRONMENT: 11.1 Stormwater management and Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Property shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations, First Ed. 1999, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 which results in the highest order of stormwater control in existing Virginia law at the time of construction of any such facility. 12. TRANSPORTATION: 12.1 Transportation improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the study entitled "A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods," prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associated, dated Februray 2, 2006 with addendum dated July 11, 2006 (the "TIA" ). The Applicant shall privately fund all transportation improvements required of this project. 12.2 The Applicant shall install or bond a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to issuance of the 50`i' building permit unless otherwise directed by Frederick County and/or VDOT. 12.3 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per single family, detached dwelling and $500 per single family, attached dwelling for transportation improvements to the Tasker Road corridor upon the issuance of a building permit for each unit. 12.4 The Applicant shall construct Macedonia Church Road from its intersection with Front Royal Pike as a four lane roadway with a landscaped median for a minimum distance of 200 feet prior to transitioning to a three lane section that extends to the entrance to Tasker Woods then transitions into a two lane section that aligns with the existing two lane section of improved White Oak Road at Canter Estates. Said roadway shall also include turn lanes as directed by VDOT. Said improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of the 50`h building permit. Improvements to Macedonia Church Road shall also include the construction of an iron fence along a portion of the frontage of the Macedonia Church property and consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point as depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall dedicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot right of way to allow full implementation of a major collector roadway between existing White Oak Road and Front Royal Pike that will not negatively impact the existing graveyard at Macedonia Church. (See 1 on GDP) 12.5 Direct access to individual lots from the portion of Macedonia Church Road designated as a major collector shall be prohibited. Page 5 of 8 0 ATC URRr.�'- Ta.Sker 11 "oodr Proffer Statement 12.6 Access to commercial portions of the Property shall be provided via the future roadway connecting the commercial and residential portions of the property as indicated on the GDP. Said connection between residential and commercial portions of the Property shall be made prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. Commercial entrances on Tasker Road shall be prohibited. 12.7 The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation that is binding for a period of five years from the date of final rezoning approval with an option for an additional five years for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Marcel Drive and the proposed entrance on Tasker Road. In addition, the Applicant shall be responsible through said agreement, for the installation of a Southbound left turn lane on the proposed internal collector road as well as a westbound right turn lane on Tasker Road at the subject intersection. If or when, in the opinion of VDOT, a traffic signal and/or the turn lanes are required, the Applicant shall provide funds including any necessary bond to construct improvements at said intersection. 12.8 The Applicant shall dedicate 27 feet of right of way from the center line of the portion of Macedonia Church Road not identified as a major collector prior to issuance of the 50' building permit. 13. HISTORICMARKER 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Church that notes the historical significance of Macedonia Church. 14. COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 14.1 All buildings within the commercial area of the Property shall be constructed using compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facade in addition to any facade fronting Tasker Road of all commercial buildings shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. 15. COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE 15.1 Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the proposed internal collector road entrance at Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs located on the Property shall be 20 feet. 15.2 Pylon style signs shall be prohibited on the Property. Page 6 of 8 • �T 7 as ker 11"'oods Proffer Statement 16. STREET TREES 16.1 The Applicant shall locate street trees along the road frontage of both Tasker Road and the proposed internal minor collector road within the commercial land bay of the Property to enhance the visual characteristics of both corridors. Said street trees shall be planted a maximum of 40' apart and shall be planted prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 7 of 8 • 0 NOT CURRENT Tacker I C"oodi Proffer Statement Respectfully su STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was of C , 2006, by _0 My commissi Notary Public day •••���rrrrrrrrri .• ,rRISTiI�q ••, pMOC. J'i ci Z Z •. � ' artviA •. J . "��qr PUB�1.,•'�� • i� \ CMOLIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TINGLE ACCESS P❑INT IRON FENCE �` s N � COMMUNITY CENTER MA0i 6 POCKET PARK 4*. Q Ac) %* sF LOT) / Sr wT RE IAA Tap j 28% ACRES PROPO SE, TACHED SNAtI, L \ / & SF CHED � J SF ATTACHED �♦ �\ CTDVNCHM 'REZONE RA TO B2 — 18,897 Acres PROPOSED USE, COMMERCIAL / 1 —.•�— ro TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc oa �• GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 117 E Pica St Winchester, Virginia 22601 % Q VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 carncanv iv+iunv Iwcwuie Tasker Woods Pmffer Statement AUG 2 1 2006 PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ. # J-06 RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) 60.281 acres +/- and B2 (General Business) 18.897 acres +/- PROPERTY: 79.178 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcels 76-A-48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Allden, LLC APPLICANT: Allden, LLC PROJECT NAME: Tasker Woods ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 15, 2006 REVISION DATE(S): June 12, 2006 July 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 16, 2006 August 18, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the `Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised August 16, 2006 (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Page 1 of 8 C� NUARRENT Tacker Woods Pmffer Statement 1. LAND USE: 1.1 Residential development on the Property shall not exceed 319 units. The mixture of single family detached and attached units shall be designated at the time of Master Development Plan and shall not generate more than 2,931 average daily trips (ADT). 1.2 The project shall be developed pursuant to an annualized phasing plan. Building permits for no more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued within any calendar year. 1.3 Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the Property shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. 2. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND PLAN APPROVALS: 2.1 The Property shall be developed as one single and unified development in accordance with applicable ordinances, regulations, and design standards, this Tasker Woods Proffer Statement, and in substantial conformity with the GDP as approved by the Board. 3. FIRE & RESCUE: 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $720.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sutra of $528.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 4. SCHOOLS: 4.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $19,189.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 4.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $14,618.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5. PARKS & OPEN SPACE: 5.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $2,136.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. Page 2 of 8 • NOT CURENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 5.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1,634.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5.3 Prior to issuance of the 100`s building permit the Applicant shall construct a community center, including a 2,400 square foot pool and full basketball court, in the location depicted on the GDP. Other recreational improvements shall include a minimum of two tot lots and a picnic shelter in the locations depicted on the GDP. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 5.4 The Applicant shall construct a ten foot asphalt public pedestrian -bicycle trail in the locations depicted on the GDP. Along the Property frontage on Tasker Road and the portion of Macedonia Church Road identified as a major collector said trail shall be constructed in lieu of the adjacent sidewalk. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 6. LIBRARIES: 6.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sutra of $267.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 6.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sutra of $204.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY: 7.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $658.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 7.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $503.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 8. GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 8.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $320.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 8.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sutra of $245.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. Page 3 of 8 u NACURRENT Tacker Woods Proffer Statement 9 10. CREATION OF HOMEOWNERS' AND PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION: 9.1 The residential development shall be made subject to a homeowners' association (hereinafter "HOA") that shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance and repair of all common areas, including any conservation areas that may be established in accordance herewith not dedicated to the County or others, for each area subject to their jurisdiction, and shall be provided such other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations or as may be required for such HOA herein. 9.2 In addition to such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned, an HOA shall have title to and responsibility for (i) all common open space areas not otherwise dedicated to public use, (ii) common buffer areas located outside of residential lots; (iii) common solid waste disposal programs by a commercial collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of any street, perimeter, or road buffer areas, all of which buffer areas shall be located within easements to be granted to the HOA if platted within residential or other lots, or otherwise granted to the HOA by appropriate instrument, (v) responsibility for payment for maintenance of streetlights and (vi) maintenance of BMP's and stormwater conveyance channels. 9.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund for the Tasker Woods HOA that will include an initial lump sutra payment of $2,500.00 by the Applicant and an additional payment of $100.00 for each platted lot within the Tasker Woods community of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the Tasker Woods HOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the Tasker Woods HOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Document and Deed of Dedication that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the Applicant to the Tasker Woods HOA. The start up funds for the Tasker Woods HOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. WATER & SEWER: 10.1 The Applicant shall be responsible for connecting the Property to public water and sewer, and for constructing all facilities required for such connection. All water and sewer infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. Page 4 of 8 • • ,NUT CURRENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 11. ENVIRONMENT: 11.1 Stormwater management and Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Property shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations, First Ed. 1999, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 which results in the highest order of stormwater control in existing Virginia law at the time of construction of any such facility. 12. TRANSPORTATION: 12.1 Transportation improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the study entitled "A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods," prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associated, dated Februray 2, 2006 with addendum dated July 11, 2006 (the "TIA'D. The Applicant shall privately fund all transportation improvements required of this project. 12.2 The Applicant shall install or bond a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to issuance of the 50`h building permit unless otherwise directed by Frederick County and/or VDOT. 12.3 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per single family, detached dwelling and $500 per single family, attached dwelling for transportation improvements to the Tasker Road corridor upon the issuance of a building permit for each unit. 12.4 The Applicant shall realign Macedonia Church Road as indicated on the GDP and in accordance with the TIA to extend the current improved section of White Oak Road to Front Royal Pike. Realignment of said roadway shall include the design of a four lane roadway with landscaped median and the construction of two lanes of the roadway from the terminus of White Oak Road at Macedonia Church Road to Front Royal Pike. Construction of this improvement shall include the construction of an iron fence along a portion of the frontage of the Macedonia Church property and consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point as depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall dedicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot right of way to allow full implementation of a major collector roadway that will not negatively impact the existing graveyard at Macedonia Church. Said improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of the 50t' building permit (See 1 on GDP) 12.5 Direct access to individual lots from the portion of Macedonia Church Road designated as a major collector shall be prohibited. 12.6 Access to commercial portions of the Property shall be provided via the future roadway connecting the commercial and residential portions of the property as indicated on the GDP. Said connection between residential and commercial portions of the Property shall be made prior to occupancy of any Page 5 of 8 • NOT CURRENT Tacker Woods Proffer Statement building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. Commercial entrances on Tasker Road shall be prohibited. 12.7 The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation that is binding for a period of five years from the date of final rezoning approval with an option for an additional five years for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Marcel Drive and the proposed entrance on Tasker Road. In addition, the Applicant shall be responsible through said agreement, for the installation of a Southbound left turn lane on the proposed internal collector road as well as a westbound right turn lane on Tasker Road at the subject intersection. If or when, in the opinion of VDOT, a traffic signal and/or the turn lanes are required, the Applicant shall provide funds including any necessary bond to construct improvements at said intersection. 12.8 The Applicant shall dedicate 27 feet of right of way from the center line of the portion of Macedonia Church Road not identified as a major collector prior to issuance of the 50`h building permit. 13. HISTORIC MARKER 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Church that notes the historical significance of Macedonia Church. 14. COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 14.1 All buildings within the commercial area of the Property shall be constructed using compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facade in addition to any facade fronting Tasker Road of all commercial buildings shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. 15. COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE 15.1 Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the proposed internal collector road entrance at Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs located on the Property shall be 20 feet. 15.2 Pylon style signs shall be prohibited on the Property. 16. STREET TREES 16.1 The Applicant shall locate street trees along the road frontage of both Tasker Road and the proposed internal minor collector road within the commercial land bay of the Property to enhance the visual characteristics of both corridors. Said street trees shall be planted a maximum of 40' apart and shall Page 6 of 8 • NOT CURRENT Tacker Woody Proffer Statement be planted prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 7 of 8 NOT CURRENT Tasker lf'oo(h Proffer Statemen! Respec Title: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrum t was acknowledged before me this I day of . , 2006, by �� r 11�_ My commission expires -0�p 00L. SIA/ •,, Notary Public 0••'�\� ' 0 wry. _ :V:Q ''••., vivo J NOT AAA Page 8 of 8 IR❑N FENCE C❑O❑LIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TO SINGLE ACCESS P❑INT b_ TF s NOT CURRENT 60 USEt ADS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 'MENT PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 4G 4 NOT CURRENT Tarker Woods Proffer Statement PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ. # : RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) 60.281 acres +/- and B2 (General Business) 18.897 acres +/- PROPERTY: 79.178 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcels 76-A-48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Allden, LLC APPLICANT: Allden, LLC PROJECT NAME: Tasker Woods AUG 1 S 2006 ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 15, 2006 REVISION DATE(S): June 12, 2006 July 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 16, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the `Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised August 16, 2006 (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Page 1 of 7 NOT CURRENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 1. LAND USE: 2. 3. 4. 61 1.1 Residential development on the Property shall not exceed 319 units. The mixture of single family detached and attached units shall be designated at the time of Master Development Plan and shall not generate more than 2,931 average daily trips (ADT). 1.2 The project shall be developed pursuant to an annualized phasing plan. Building permits for no more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued within any calendar year. 1.3 Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the Property shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND PLAN APPROVALS: 2.1 The Property shall be developed as one single and unified development in accordance with applicable ordinances, regulations, and design standards, this Tasker Woods Proffer Statement, and in substantial conformity with the GDP as approved by the Board. FIRE & RESCUE: 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $720.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $528.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. SCHOOLS: 4.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $19,189.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 4.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $14,618.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. PARKS & OPEN SPACE: 5.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $2,136.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. Page 2 of 7 • • NOT CURRENT Tacker Woods Proffer Statement 5.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1,634.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5.3 Prior to issuance of the 100d' building permit the Applicant shall construct a community center, including a 2,400 square foot pool and full basketball court, in the location depicted on the GDP. Other recreational improvements shall include a minimum of two tot lots and a picnic shelter in the locations depicted on the GDP. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 5.4 The Applicant shall construct a ten foot asphalt public pedestrian -bicycle trail in the locations depicted on the GDP. Along the Property frontage on Tasker Road and the portion of Macedonia Church Road identified as a major collector said trail shall be constructed in lieu of sidewalks. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development 6. LIBRARIES: 6.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $267.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 6.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $204.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY: 7.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sure of $658.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 7.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $503.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 8. GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 8.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $320.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 8.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $245.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. Page 3 of 7 NOT CURRENT Tasker Woods Pmffer Statement 9. CREATION OF HOMEOWNERS' AND PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION: 9.1 The residential development shall be made subject to a homeowners' association (hereinafter "HOA") that shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance and repair of all common areas, including any conservation areas that may be established in accordance herewith not dedicated to the County or others, for each area subject to their jurisdiction, and shall be provided such other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations or as may be required for such HOA herein. 9.2 In addition to such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned, an HOA shall have title to and responsibility for (i) all common open space areas not otherwise dedicated to public use, (ii) common buffer areas located outside of residential lots; (iii) common solid waste disposal programs by a commercial collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of any street, perimeter, or road buffer areas, all of which buffer areas shall be located within easements to be granted to the HOA if platted within residential or other lots, or otherwise granted to the HOA by appropriate instrument, (v) responsibility for payment for maintenance of streetlights and (vi) maintenance of BMP's and stormwater conveyance channels. 9.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund for the Tasker Woods HOA that will include an initial lump sum payment of $2,500.00 by the Applicant and an additional payment of $100.00 for each platted lot within the Tasker Woods community of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the Tasker Woods HOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the Tasker Woods HOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Document and Deed of Dedication that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the Applicant to the Tasker Woods HOA. The start up funds for the Tasker Woods HOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. 10. WATER & SEWER: 10.1 The Applicant shall be responsible for connecting the Property to public water and sewer, and for constructing all facilities required for such connection. All water and sewer infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. Page 4 of 7 • NOT CURRENT Tasker Woodr Pmf er Statement 11. ENVIRONMENT: 11.1 Stormwater management and Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Property shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations, First Ed. 1999, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 which results in the highest order of stormwater control in existing Virginia law at the time of construction of any such facility. 12. TRANSPORTATION: 12.1 Transportation improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the study entitled "A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods," prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associated, dated Februray 2, 2006 with addendum dated July 11, 2006 (the "TIA"). The Applicant shall privately fund all transportation improvements required of this project. 12.2 The Applicant shall install or bond a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to issuance of the 50`s building permit unless otherwise directed by Frederick County and/or VDOT. 12.3 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per single family, detached dwelling and $500 per single family, attached dwelling for transportation improvements to the Tasker Road corridor. 12.4 The Applicant shall realign Macedonia Church Road as indicated on the GDP and in accordance with the TIA to extend the current improved section of White Oak Road to Front Royal Pike. Realignment of said roadway shall include the design of a four lane roadway with landscaped median and the construction of two lanes of the roadway from the terminus of White Oak Road at Macedonia Church Road to Front Royal Pike. Construction of this improvement shall include the construction of an iron fence along a portion of the frontage of the Macedonia Church property and consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point as depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall dedicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot right of way to allow full implementation of a major collector roadway that will not negatively impact the existing graveyard at Macedonia Church. Said improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of the 50t' building permit (See 1 on GDP) 12.5 Direct access to individual lots from the portion of Macedonia Church Road designated as a major collector shall be prohibited. 12.6 Access to commercial portions of the Property shall be provided via the future roadway connecting the commercial and residential portions of the property as indicated on the GDP. Said connection between residential and commercial portions of the Property shall be made prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. Commercial entrances on Tasker Road shall be prohibited. Page 5 of 7 NOT CURRENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 12.7 The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation that is binding for a period of five years from the date of final rezoning approval with an option for an additional five years for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Marcel Drive and the proposed entrance on Tasker Road. In addition, the Applicant shall be responsible through said agreement, for the installation of a Southbound left turn lane on the proposed internal collector road as well as a westbound right turn lane on Tasker Road at the subject intersection. If or when, in the opinion of VDOT, a traffic signal and/or the turn lanes are required, the Applicant shall provide funds including any necessary bond to construct improvements at said intersection. 12.8 The Applicant shall dedicate 27 feet of right of way from the center line of the portion of Macedonia Church Road not identified as a major collector prior to issuance of the 50t' building permit. 13. HISTORIC MARKER 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Church that notes the historical significance of Macedonia Church. 14. COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 14.1 All buildings within the commercial area of the Property shall be constructed using compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facade in addition to any facade fronting Tasker Road of all commercial buildings shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. 15. COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE 15.1 Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the proposed internal collector road entrance at Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs located on the Property shall be 20 feet. 15.2 Pylon style signs shall be prohibited on the Property. 16. STREET TREES 16.1 The Applicant shall locate street trees along the road frontage of both Tasker Road and the proposed internal minor collector road within the commercial land bay of the Property to enhance the visual characteristics of both corridors. Said street trees shall be planted a maximum of 40' apart. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 6 of 7 0 N0T Cu,,E,,,p Tacker Woodr Proffer Statement Respec Title: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrum t was acknowleed before me this day of -A , 2006, by J nYQ r Q r, nap (i(� My commission expires 9 - -�(� ��` P L. SllyF'•,,• Notary Public Q�\• �W ��rti•• •0 Wk ��'•. �OTAR� eJ; Page 7 of 7 Parker IF oodr Proffer Statement PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ. #{ : RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) 60.281 acres +/- and B2 (General Business) 18.897 acres +/- PROPERTY: 79.178 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcels 76-A 48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER Allden, LLC APPLICANT: Allden, LLC PROJECT NAME: Tasker Woods ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 15, 2006 REVISION DATE(S): June 12, 2006 July 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 11, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property'), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised August 1, 2006 (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Page 1 of 7 • • NOT CUR]t .'-- NT "Parker IP'oodr Pro(%rStatement LAND USE: 1.1 Residential development on the Property shall not exceed 319 units. The mixture of single family detached and attached units shall be designated at the time of Master Development Plan and shall not generate more than 2,931 average daily trips (ADT). 1.2 The project shall be developed pursuant to an annualized phasing plan. Building permits for no more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued within any calendar year. 1.3 Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the Property shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. 2. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND PLAN APPROVALS: 2.1 The Property shall be developed as one single and unified development in accordance with applicable ordinances, regulations, and design standards, this Tasker Woods Proffer Statement, and in substantial conformity with the GDP as approved by the Board. 3. FIRE & RESC'UE: 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $720.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $528.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 4. SCHOOLS: 4.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $19,189.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 4.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $14,618.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5. PARKS & OPEN SPACE: 5.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $2,136.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. Page 2 of 7 NOT CURRENT Tacker Foods Proffer Statement 5.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1,634.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5.3 The Applicant shall construct a community center, including a 2,400 square foot pool and full basketball court, in the location depicted on the GDP. Other recreational improvements shall include a minimum of two tot lots, a picnic shelter, and a ten foot public pedestrian -bicycle trail in the locations depicted on the GDP. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. 6. LIBRARIES: 6.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $267.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 6.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $204.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY: 7.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $658.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 7.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $503.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 8.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $320.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 8.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $245.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 9. CREATION OF HOMEOWNERS' AND PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION: 9.1 The residential development shall be made subject to a homeowners' association (hereinafter "HOA") that shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance and repair of all common areas, including any conservation areas that may be established in accordance herewith not dedicated to the Page 3 of 7 • NOT CURRENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement County or others, for each area subject to their jurisdiction, and shall be provided such other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations or as may be required for such HOA herein. 9.2 In addition to such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned, an HOA shall have title to and responsibility for (i) all common open space areas not otherwise dedicated to public use, (ii) common buffer areas located outside of residential lots; (iii) common solid waste disposal programs by a commercial collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of any street, perimeter, or road buffer areas, all of which buffer areas shall be located within easements to be granted to the HOA if platted within residential or other lots, or otherwise granted to the HOA by appropriate instrument, (v) responsibility for payment for maintenance of streetlights and (vi) maintenance of BMP's and stormwater conveyance channels. 9.2 The Applicant shall establish a start-up fund for the Tasker Woods HOA that will include an initial lump sutra payment of $2,500.00 by the Applicant and an additional payment of $100.00 for each platted lot within the Tasker Woods community of which the assessment for each platted lot is to be collected at the time of initial transfer of title and to be directed to the Tasker Woods HOA fund. Language will be incorporated into the Tasker Woods HOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenant Document and Deed of Dedication that ensures the availability of these funds prior to the transfer of ownership and maintenance responsibility from the Applicant to the Tasker Woods HOA. The start up funds for the Tasker Woods HOA shall be made available for the purpose of maintenance of all improvements within the common open space areas, liability insurance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. 10. WATER & SEWER: 10.1 The Applicant shall be responsible for connecting the Property to public water and sewer, and for constructing all facilities required for such connection. All water and sewer infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 11. ENVIRONMENT: 11.1 Stormwater management and Best Management Practices (BMP) for the Property shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations, First Ed. 1999, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 which results in the highest order of stormwater control in existing Virginia law at the time of construction of any such facility. Page 4 of 7 Cl NOT CURRENT Tasker li'oodr Proffer Statement 12. TRANSPORTATION: 12.1 Transportation improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the study entitled "A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods," prepared by Patton Hams Rust & Associated, dated Februray 2, 2006 (the The Applicant shall privately fund all transportation improvements required of this project. 12.2 The Applicant shall install or bond a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to issuance of the 50`' building permit unless otherwise directed by Frederick County and/or VDOT. 12.3 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per single family, detached dwelling and $500 per single family, attached dwelling for transportation improvements to the Tasker Road corridor. 12.4 The Applicant shall realign Macedonia Church Road as indicated on the GDP and in accordance with the TIA to extend the current improved section of White Oak Road to Front Royal Pike. Realignment of said roadway shall include the construction of a major collector roadway from the terminus of White Oak Road at Macedonia Church Road to Front Royal Pike. Construction of this improvement shall include the construction of an iron fence along the frontage of the Macedonia Church property and consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point. The Applicant shall dedicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot right of way to allow full implementation of a major collector roadway that will not negatively impact the existing graveyard at Macedonia Church. Said improvement shall be completed prior to issuance of the 50`' building permit (See 1 on GDP) 12.5 Direct access to individual lots from the portion of Macedonia Church Road designated as a major collector shall be prohibited. 12.6 Access to commercial portions of the Property shall be provided via the future roadway connecting the commercial and residential portions of the property as indicated on the GDP. Said connection between residential and commercial portions of the Property shall be made prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. Commercial entrances on Tasker Road shall be prohibited. 12.7 The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation that is binding for a period of five years from the date of final rezoning approval with an option for an additional five years for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Marcel Drive and the proposed entrance on Tasker Road. In addition, the Applicant shall be responsible through said agreement, for the installation of a Southbound left turn lane on the proposed internal collector road as well as a westbound right turn lane on Tasker Road at the subject intersection. If or when, in the Page 5 of 7 • • NOT CURRENT Tacker Woods Proffer Statement opinion of VDOT, a traffic signal and/or the turn lanes are required, the Applicant shall provide funds including any necessary bond to construct improvements at said intersection. 12.8 The Applicant shall dedicate 10 feet of additional right of way along the portion of Macedonia Church Road not identified as a major collector prior to issuance of the 50°i building permit. 13. HISTORIC MARKER 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Church that notes the historical significance of Macedonia Church. 14. COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 14.1 All buildings within the commercial area of the Property shall be constructed using compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facade in addition to any facade fronting Tasker Road of all commercial buildings shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. 15. COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE 15.1 Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the proposed internal collector road entrance at Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs located on the Property shall be 20 feet. 15.2 Pylon style signs shall be prohibited on the Property. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 6 of 7 NOT CURRENT Tasker li"oodr Pm(%rStatement Respe( En Title: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument as acknowledged before me this d`G�R.STIly,���,,� of iU, 2006, by I _ n V-e r C nL (lc/ • ��MOJy� �+� , My commission pires _ � �iJ' � '♦' 2• Notary Public '•,t� ;2 :t gyP�B��G,,. Page 7 of 7 C❑MMUNITY CENTER - & POCKET PARK (3 Ac) C�3 �U SF DETA (SMALL i —REZ 60-\V 93 -Rp TA HED �Q ATTACHED � SF ATTACHED R/W~ RE ❑ 2,.4 USE, TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc W GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 O O O VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINIA • 0 Tinker l!'oods Pr (# YL2 1 M PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ. # D(o: RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) 58.08 acres +/- and B2 (General Business) 18.89 acres +/- PROPERTY: RECORD OWNER. APPLICANT: PROJECT NAME: ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: REVISION DATES) 76.97 Acres +/-; Tax Map Parcels 76-A 48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property") Allden, LLC Allden, LLC Tasker Woods March 15, 2006 June 12, 2006 July 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Propert)"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised June 1, 2006 (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Page 1 of 7 0 Tasker 11-oods Proffer Slalement LAND USE: 1.1 Residential development on the Property shall not exceed 319 units. The mixture of single family detached and attached units shall be designated at the time of Master Development Plan and shall not generate more than 2,931 average dailytrips (ADT). 1.2 The project shall be developed pursuant to an annualized phasing plan. Certificates of occupancy for no more than 90 dwelling units shall be issued within any calendar year. 1.3 Commercial development on the B2 zoned portion of the Property shall not exceed 179,000 square feet. 2. CONDITIONS PRECEDENT TO THE ISSUANCE OF PERMITS AND PLAN APPROVALS: 2.1 The Property shall be developed as one single and unified development in accordance with applicable ordinances, regulations, and design standards, this Tasker Woods Proffer Statement, and in substantial conformity with the GDP as approved by the Board. FIRE & RESCUE: 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $720.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $528.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for fire and rescue purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 4. SCHOOLS: 4.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $19,189.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 4.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $14,618.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. PARKS & OPEN SPACE: 5.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $2,136.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. Page 2 of 7 • • NOT CURRENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 5.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1,634.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for recreational purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 5.3 The Applicant shall construct a community center, including a 2,400 square foot pool and full basketball court, in the location depicted on the GDP. Other recreational improvements shall include a minimum of two tot lots, a picnic shelter, and a ten foot public pedestrian -bicycle trail in the locations depicted on the GDP. Said improvements shall count towards the recreational unit requirement for the proposed development. naffA131:0 6.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $267.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 6.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $204.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 7. PUBLIC SAFETY: 7.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $658.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 7.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $503.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for public safety purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. GENERAL GOVERNMENT: 8.1 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $320.00 per single family, detached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit. 8.2 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $245.00 per single family, attached dwelling unit for general governmental purposes upon issuance of a building permit for each attached unit. 9. CREATION OF HOMEOWNERS' AND PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION: 9.1 The residential development shall be made subject to a homeowners' association (hereinafter "HOA') that shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance and repair of all common areas, including any conservation areas that may be established in accordance herewith not dedicated to the Page 3 of 7 0 _IVOT CURRENT Tacker Foods Proffer Statement County or others, for each area subject to their jurisdiction, and shall be provided such other responsibilities, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations or as may be required for such HOA herein. 9.2 In addition to such other duties and responsibilities as may be assigned, an HOA shall have title to and responsibility for (i) all common open space areas not otherwise dedicated to public use, (ii) common buffer areas located outside of residential lots; (iii) common solid waste disposal programs by a commercial collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetual maintenance of any street, perimeter, or road buffer areas, all of which buffer areas shall be located within easements to be granted to the HOA if platted within residential or other lots, or otherwise granted to the HOA by appropriate instrument, (v) responsibility for payment for maintenance of streetlights and (vi) maintenance of BMP's and stormwater conveyance channels. 10. WATER & SEWER 10.1 The Applicant shall be responsible for connecting the Property to public water and sewer, and for constructing all facilities required for such connection. All water and sewer infrastructure shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority and the Frederick Winchester Service Authority. 11. ENVIRONMENT: 11.1 Stormwater management and Best Management Practices (BNT) for the Property shall be provided in accordance with the Virginia Stormwater Management Regulations, First Ed. 1999, Chapter 2, Table 2-3 which results in the highest order of stormwater control in existing Virginia law at the time of construction of any such facility. 12. TRANSPORTATION: 12.1 Transportation improvements shall be designed and constructed consistent with the study entitled "A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods," prepared by Patton Harris Rust & Associated, dated Februray 2, 2006 (the "TIA" ). The Applicant shall privately fund all transportation improvements required of this project. 12.2 The Applicant shall install or bond a traffic signal at the intersection of Route 522 and Macedonia Church Road prior to occupancy of the 50`h dwelling unit unless otherwise directed by Frederick County and/or VDOT. 12.3 The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per single family, detached dwelling and $500 per single family, attached dwelling for transportation improvements to the Tasker Road corridor. Page 4 of 7 • • PUT CURRENT Tasker Woods Proffer Statement 12.4 The Applicant shall realign White Oak Road as indicated on the GDP and in accordance with the TIA to facilitate a safer traffic movement. Realignment of said roadway shall include the construction of a major collector roadway from Macedonia Church Road to Route 522. Construction of this improvement shall include the construction of an iron fence along the frontage of the Macedonia Church property and consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point. The Applicant shall dedicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot right of way to allow full implementation of a major collector roadway to connect the existing terminus of White Oak Road at Macedonia Church Road with Route 522 that will not negatively impact the existing graveyard at Macedonia Church. (See 1 on GDP) 12.5 Direct access to individual lots from the portion of Macedonia Church Road designated as a major collector shall be prohibited. 12.6 Access to commercial portions of the Property shall be provided via the future roadway connecting the commercial and residential portions of the property as indicated on the GDP. Said connection between residential and commercial portions of the Property shall be made prior to occupancy of any building constructed on the portion of the Property zoned B2. Commercial entrances on Tasker Road shall be prohibited. 12.7 The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with the Virginia Department of Transportation that is binding for a period of five years from the date of final rezoning approval with an option for an additional five years for the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Marcel Drive and the proposed entrance on Tasker Road. If or when, in the opinion of VDOT, a traffic signal is required, the Applicant shall provide funds including any necessary bond to construct a traffic signal at said intersection. 13. HISTORIC MARKER 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Church that notes the historical significance of Macedonia Church. 14. COMMERCIAL DESIGN STANDARDS 14.1 All buildings within the commercial area of the Property shall be constructed using compatible architectural style and materials. The principal facade in addition to any facade fronting Tasker Road of all commercial buildings shall be limited to one or a combination of the following materials: cast stone, stone, brick, glass, wood, stucco or other high quality, long lasting masonry materials. Page 5 of 7 CJ • NOT CURREI NT Tasker Wooer Proffer Statement 15. COMMERCIAL SIGNAGE 15.1 Freestanding commercial signage along Tasker Road shall be limited to a single monument style sign at the single proposed entrance on Tasker Road. Maximum height for all signs located on the Property shall be 20 feet. 15.2 Pylon style signs shall be prohibited on the Property. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 6 of 7 • NOT CURRENT Tasker Woods Pmffer Statement Respec Title: STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowled ed before me this o, I day of �l,L _, 2006, by , _ My commission ices -3 0 - Q Notary Public ;t RVSTIA(,Q''�,,�� • ,.�OM OA(Th N� .Z. • co �• .9 ' �/NIA...•' ��. 9rPUB6P%%%�•'. Page 7 of 7 NOT CURRENT COMMUNITY CENTER & POCKET PARK C3 Ac> HED y� SF DET` C IT-- (CLU REfZONE RA' TO RP ;\ / 58,08 AC/RES_ I P)WPSED USE, SF/DETACHED CLTER, l = SFi SHAD. LOT L SF ATTACHED / iV At /C IOWNHOME$7/ � j j-/ L1J Nil 'REZONE RA T❑ B2 t' 18.89 Acres 9d -PROPOSED USE, ,-. COMMERCIAL TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc GENERALIZED DEVE-kOPMENT PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 O O `b VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 0) Q FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRCINIA January 2006 1* Tasker Woods PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT i From: Ingra�i�, Lloyd [Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov]19 Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 7:37 AM To: 'Ronald A. Mislowsky' Cc: Copp, Jerry; 'Eric Lawrence (elawrenc@co.frederick.va.us)' Subject: Tasker Woods Rezoning Ron, The formal Frederick County comment sheet will follow on Monday. Tasker Woods Rezoning The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have _significant_ measurable impact on Routes 522, 642, and 756_. Routes are the VDOT roadway(s) which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in the _Tasker Woods _ rezoning application dated _March 15, 2006 and revised on June 12,2006 and July 5,2006_ addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Sixth Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off - site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT -- Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) Patrick R. Sowers From: Ronald A. Mislowsky [Ronald.Mislowsky@phra.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:41 PM To: Patrick Sowers; Tommy Price "' Cc: Clay Athey SOT CUR --RE Subject: FW: Tasker Woods Rezoning Guys, can we respond to this quickly? Ron -----Original Message ----- From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [mailto: Rhonda. Funkhouser@VDOT. Virginia. gov) On Behalf Of Ingram, Lloyd Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006 2:37 PM To: 'Ronald A. Mislowsky' Cc: Copp, Jerry; Ingram, Lloyd; 'Eric Lawrence' Subject: Tasker Woods Rezoning Prior to submitting final comments for the Tasker Woods Rezoning, there are some items we wish to have further clarification on: * One of the proffers you offered was the installation of a signal at Tasker Road and White Oak Road. Currently there is another subdivision obligated to install the signal. However, the turn lanes will still need to be installed in coordination with the installation of the signal. Therefore, we would like the wording of the proffer to state such. * Since the signal at Tasker Road and White Oak Road is not needed, we would like to see the developer enter into a signal agreement at the intersection of Tasker Road and Marcel Drive. * Proffer are not clear as to when the connection to Tasker at Marcel will take place. It is felt this connection will be critical for the smooth flow of traffic within this proposed subdivision. Therefore, we would expect it to be built during the first phase of the development plan. * The improvements to White Oak Road in front of the church are noted in the application. We would like more clarification noted in the proffers themselves. These improvements are to be constructed all the way to the intersection with Route 522 by the developer. * Additional right-of-way along the interior collector road is needed to accommodate the 5' sidewalk and 3' utility grass strips as noted in the Subdivision Street Design Guide. * Clarification is also requested of the typical cross section shown in Figure 5 of your application which denotes two 14' travel lanes and the center an apparent 12' turn lanes. This typical would then preclude parking on the street. I was wondering if the applicant is desiring that of the typical? Should you have any questions or require clarification, please contact me. Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT - Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) 1 0 Control number RZ06-0005 Project Name Tasker Woods Address 117 E. Piccadilly St. Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning RA Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Frederick County Fire and rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed 4/11/2006 4/13/2006 Applicant PHR&A City State Zip Winchester VA 22601 Tax ID Number Fire District 76-A-76-A-49 11 Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Approved as submitted Plan Approval Recommended Yes Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway/Aisleway Width Not Identified Date Revised Applicant Phone 540-667-2139 Rescue District 11 Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No Reviewed By Signature , J. Bauserman � - Title ALP"WAF Rezonin2 Comments REVISED TASKER WOODS REZONING Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5643 Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering Co. Administration Bldg., 4t Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester VA 22601 Attn: Patrick Sowers Location of Property: North of Tasker Road (Route 642) East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: RP & Acreage: 76.97 Ac B-2 • Denartment of Public Work's Comments: , Public Works Signature & Notice to Dept. of Public W to the Applicant 9 IZezoninl! Comments TASKER WOODS REZONING Frederick County Department of Inspections Mail to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections Co. Administration Bldg., 4th Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: North of Tasker Road (Route 642) East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: RP & Acreage: 76.97 Ac B-2 Department of Inspections Comments: "r u Off vbG'�4✓% �w'S, Inspections Signature & Date: ! D610 Notice to Dept. o nspections — Please Re n This Form to the Applicant RECEIVED APR 1 1 200k f REDIRIEK COUNrl PUBUC WORK & INVECIIMS • esters m� 1974 Frederick -Winchester Service Authority Post Office Box 43 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Office: 107 North Kent Street County Office Complex Winchester, Virginia 22601 1-540-722-3579 April 11, 2006 Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Gentlemen: SUBJECT: COMMENTS - TASKER WOODS REZONING I have never heard of the Opequon Urban Development Area. I am just assuming it is a portion of the existing or expanded Urban Development Area east of Stephens City. With regards to the wastewater delivery, is there a reason for not considering elimination of double pumping of taking flow from one pumping station to another, but rather tying it into the force main of the second pumping station? I am assuming, from the information given, that there will be 323 dwelling units, a mix of single family detached and townhouses, and that there will be approximately 180,000 square feet of commercial property based on the sewer and water flows provided. Other than that, I have no comments. S' erely, J se W. Moffett Executive Director Frederick -Winchester Service Authority JWM:ncg 'MaiNtaiming and Proolot1mg Me Vaeuas of Me CowixiwJty MArosgA emvironrpantae 3tewaMskip' RezoninIZ Comments TASKER WOODS REZONING Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 868-1061 Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, VA FCSA Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Sanitation Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: North of Tasker Road (Route 642), East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: RP & Acreage: 76.97 Ac B-2 Sanitation Authority Comments: 7-', X 41711DA irY syijV4 "1/r."- .��,Fc�U.�T,r" � �,� ;,�,� --=4 SF_ fN•F,q To Sanitation Authority Signature & Date j/�G � � Notice to Sanitation Authority — Please Return This Form to the Applicant 14 LA` , o RezoninF, Comments TASKER WOODS REZONING Frederick — Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick -Winchester Health Dept. Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 722-3480 Hand deliver to: Frederick -Winchester Health Dept. Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent St., Suite 201 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 722-3480 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick - Winchester Health Department with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: North of Tasker Road (Route 642), East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: RP & Acreage: 76.97 Ac B-2 Frederick — Winchester Health Department's Comments: Ne-A ti DAAar+m,rAl h� rGt :fin n�3�cfw:t� �,, o f^A 2cr_ti1{J �r.�a-sla�al T Health Signature & Date: A Notice to Health Department — Please Return This Form to the Applicant 15 Rezoning Comments REVISED TASKER WOODS REZONING Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Dept. of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Co. Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please till out the information as accurately as possible in order P, assist the a Department of Parks & Recreation with their review.; Attach a copy_ of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent inform ation Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540) 667.2139 Mailing Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Patrick Sowers Location of Property: North of Tasker Road (Route 642), East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: RP & Acreage: 76.97 Ac B-2 Dept. of Parks & Recreation Comments: Plan appears to meet open space and recreational unit requirements. During the Master Development Plan review of this project, staff will be looking for the trail to be a minimum of 10' in width and meet the Virginia Department Standards for hard surface trails. The proposed monetary proffer appears to be appropriate to address the impact this development will have on the capital facility needs of the Parks and Recreation Department. Parks Signature & Date: 64�ny Notice to Dept. of Parks & Recreation -/Please Return This Form to thelApplicant 12 00ents An geP � • G o,. .n F j Frederick County Public Schools Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Sowers: RE: Tasker Woods Rezoning Visit us at www1rederickAl2.va.us May 19, 2006 e-mail: kapocsis®frederick.k12.va.us This letter is in response to your request for comments concerning the rezoning application for the proposed Tasker Woods Rezoning project. Based on the information provided, it is anticipated that the proposed 120 single-family homes will yield 20 high school students, 17 middle school students, and 47 elementary school students. The 199 town houses will yield 22 high school students, 24 middle school students, and 62 elementary school students for a total of 192 new students upon build -out. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools serving this area having student enrollments nearing or exceeding the practical capacity for a school. The cumulative impact of this project and others of similar nature, coupled with the number of approved, undeveloped residential lots in the area, will necessitate the future construction of new school facilities to accommodate increased student enrollments. The impact of this rezoning on current and future school needs should be considered during the approval process. Respectfully yours, J Stephen Kapocsi Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent SMK/dkr cc: William C. Dean, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools Mr. Al Omdorff, Assistant Superintendent for Administration Mr. Charles Puglisi, Director of Transportation 540-662-3889 Ext 112 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604-2546 FAX 540-662-3890 Rezonin Comments TASKER WOODS REZONING Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-2422 Winchester Regional Airport Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA curately as possible in order to assist the Winchester Applicant: Fl: ase fill cut the i,�fo,,,,�ticn as ac Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (,540) 667.2139 Mailing Address: 117E Piccadilly Street Suite 200 Winchester VA 22601 Location of Property: North of Tasker Road (Route 642)East and South of Macedonia Church Road and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522). Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: RP & Acreage: 76.97 Ac B-2 Winchester Regional Airport's Comments Winchester Regional Airport Signature & Date: Notice to Winchester Regional Airport — Please Return This Form to the Applicant 16 0 y+90 WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT SERVING THE 491 AIRPORT ROAD TOP OF VIRGINIA WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662 2422 April 17, 2006 Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Comment — RA to RP & B2 Tasker Woods S� �aw� iee iviI ial %i L i%i Dear Sir/Madam: The proposed rezoning request for Tasker Woods should not impact business operations of the Winchester Regional Airport, therefore we are not requesting any special conditions for consideration. Thank you for the opportunity to review this request. Sincerely, CDMOD�' S. R. Manuel Executive Director HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILBUR C. HALL (1892-1972) THOMAS V. MONAHAN (1924-1999) 7 S 307 EAST MARKET STREET 9 EAST BOSCAWEN STREET L SAMUEL D. ENGLE LEESBURG, VIRGINIA WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 0. LELAND MAHAN TELEPHONE 703-777-1050 TELEPHONE 540-662-3200 ROBERT T. MITCHELL, JR. FAx 540-662-4304 DAMES A. KLENKAR E-MAIL lawyefs@hallmonahan.COm PLEASE REPLY TO: STEVEN F. JACKSON May 30, 2006 P. 0. BOX 848 DENNIS J. MCLOUGHLIN, JR. WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22604-0848 HAND -DELIVERY Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Tasker Woods (Allden, LLC) Proposed Proffer Statement Dear Susan: I have reviewed the above -referenced Proposed Proffer Statement. It is my opinion that the Proposed Proffer Statement is generally in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following comments: 1. While the rezoning application is to rezone property from the RA district to the RP and 132 districts, it is noted that the proffers are only conditioned upon approval of the requested RP rezoning. 2. Proffer 1.3 limits the commercial development to 179,000 square feet. The County should determine whether it wants to so limit the commercial development. Further, it should be clarified as to what the square footage requirement applies, preferably having a requirement applied to "usable floor area". Also, there is no requirement in this proffer as to the timing of the commercial development, in 0 0 HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN be MITCHELL Susan K. Eddy May 30, 2006 Page 2 relation to the residential development or otherwise. Pursuant to these proffers, the entire residential development could be built out before any commercial development was built and occupied. 3. In Proffer 2.1, it is recommended that this proffer include the provision that the development will be in substantial conformity with the Generalized Development Plan. 4. In Proffer 12.3, it is provided that "the applicant shall construct a southbound right turn lane on White Oak Road." It is not clear from the proffer or the attached Generalized Development Plan where this right turn lane will be constructed, and whether it is going to be constructed on White Oak Road or on Tasker Road. It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific property, or whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. If there are any questions concerning the foregoing comments, please contact me. ly yours, Robert T. Mitchell. H. RTM/msp COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 April 24, 2006 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust Associates, PC 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Tasker Woods Rezoning; PIN# 76-A-49 & 76-A-48A Dear Mr. Sowers: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify any core battlefields that this proposed rezoning would directly impact. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Candice E. Perkins Planner II CEP/bad j 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 5IN AWWOD AIDN IOV Al spooA4 -10-YEDI 0 0 900Z djvnuvr TASKER WOODS REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT August 2006 The Tasker Woods site is ideally suited for mixed use residential development. The project, comprised of parcels 76-A-49 and 76-A-48A, totals 79.178 Acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) and is located along the eastern boundary of the Urban Development Area in the Shawnee Magisterial District. By action of the County Board of Supervisors on July 13, 2005 the project area was included in the Urban Development Area and Sewer and Water Service Area (see Figure 1) thereby allowing for this rezoning petition which seeks to rezone 18.897 acres of land to B2 (General Business) with the remaining 60.281 acres of the site becoming RP (Residential Performance) (Figure 2). The rezoning would result in a high quality mixed use development with single family attached and detached uses with a proffered maximum of 319 dwelling units. The site is surrounded by primary and major collector roadways providing for excellent transportation characteristics. The site has a high elevation of 722.10 feet and a low elevation of 690.0 feet with a general cross slope of 2% to 5%. Characteristic of most properties within the Martinsburg shale areas of Frederick County, this site was intensively farmed at some point, but no farming has occurred on the site for at least 20 years. This site is overgrown by cedars and scrub brush which is characteristic of land that has been taken out of basic agriculture. Site drainage is afforded by a tributary to Wrights Run which traverses the site from west to east along with a minor drainage shed which leaves the site to the north and east. The principle land use surrounding the site is single family residential with some institutional and church uses. The area to the south is predominantly the Eastgate Industrial Park which is a developing center for economic growth in Frederick County. The site is underlain by Martinsburg shale which has been very suitable for the development of residential communities within the Urban Development Area. Site utilities traverse the site including a major water main loop owned by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Sanitary sewer is available to the south as a part of the Eastgate Industrial Park. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES As mentioned, the principle use surrounding this site is residential. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph from 2001 depicting the typical developed uses in the vicinity of the site. The predominate use to the north of the site is the Macedonia Methodist Church facilities including a new church together with the old chapel facility and community building and graveyard. To the north and west is older established single family homes along Macedonia Church Road and Canter Estates which is a part of the Tasker area land bays and approaching build out of single family homes. To the south and west are a single family home and a small farm together with lands planned for business and industrial uses including 1 s wi I M ooa't oos esc 0 soot aunt - ljvaa ueld ash pue-1 spooM jamsel b'SMS �y 0 sajej ; leutsnpu; sweaits aoeds undo speoa Nepuooes ssau'sng speoa tiewud jeguapisoa Speoa ._asnpuej van sawed = NSMs Q ' Vsms — wail popnpX3 b03 CONSOLIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TO SINGLE ACCESS POINT o IRON FENCE � O F COMMUNITY L CENTER '`� MACED041�' �m`) �`• & POCKET PARK 'N. `_ — 4 (3 AC) �� / } -�� SF T / Q, SF DET H �., (SMA L T) RE IAA TARP .28Y ACRES _ PROPOS SE,/ S TACHED S ` + & SF CHED \ / � \ SF ATTACHE (TOWNHOMES) 1. ._ % \ (PUBLIC) I , REZONE RA TO :t 18,897 Acres ` Cm PROPOSED USE, COMMERCIAL V / w TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc II` v o GENERALIZED DEl/ELOPMENi PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 O O O VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, KRGINIA FIGURE 2 S EP 1 g 2006 KNOW :UMOO Y.918303W £6ti0-999 (Otis) :XVJ 6£lZ—L99 (Otis) :3010A o 0 0 L09ZZ o!u!6iA 'ia}sayau }S �II!P�a!d '3 Ll l '� \ dVH N011 VO07 \ h cb �d `sa}Dl3OSSV N jsn� `sIJJDH `uo}}Dd SOOOM &_7i1Sd1 PZX ir ir t LM L Ly A J y u J 126t41 , a a Wftlt i h` �e i T'•_ a;� fi.��''°�Z 1. � ry. 4F `ix . •. ` ��� •... t of , i Q n the Eastgate Industrial Park. To the east are large lot residential uses generally fronting on Route 522. The suggested land use plan was created during the UDA expansion process and shows a hierarchical transition of residential intensities with single family detached uses turning to single family attached prior to the transition to the commercial land bay. This plan provides for a more appropriate transition from the single family uses in the surrounding area to the proposed commercial and existing commercial and industrial areas South of the Property. The site generally drains to a principle tributary of Wrights Run and away from existing residential uses. Design of the project should include special provisions for improvement and mitigation of drainage issues that may arise. Special consideration in design should be given to the existing Macedonia United Methodist Church Road in order to enhance and preserve the church property and function. Also the improvement of White Oak Road as a major collector to create a more appropriate connection with Route 522. ENVIRONMENT Figure 4 is provided to delineate the important environmental features in accordance with County policy and procedures. Of note are wetlands, steep slopes, and other special environmental features. None of die above listed environmental factors presents a Cparticularly difficult planning impact for development of this _site. Sensitive use of these areas will produce a meaningful open space plan. The Property is sparsely wooded and includes limited wetlands. The National Wetlands Inventory indicates that wetlands on the site are limited to two ponds, one near the northern property line adjacent to Front Royal Pike as well as a pond situated closer to the Southern boundary of the property near Tasker Road. Any wetlands that may exist along stream channels located on the site will be protected by both riparian buffers as well as an open space plan that provides an additional buffer for these environmental features. There are no special issues regarding previous development on the site that requite n itigation. TRAFFIC A complete transportation impact analysis has been prepared and is attached as "Appendix A." Of significance is a plan suggested by the Urban Development Area expansion process which includes a weak link minor collector connection between Tasker Road and White Oak Road as shown on attached Figure 5. By locating this minor collector roadway adjacent to the east property line of the project it affords direct access by future development of properties to die east which primarily front on U.S. Route 522 where intersections should be discouraged. Improvement of White Oak Road to a major collector status in accordance with the Eastern Road Plan is provided by proffer for this project. It includes improvement of the roadway along the frontage of Macedonia Church Road to align with die improved section of White Oak Road. The improvement of White Oak Road was accomplished 2 WETLANDS (EX POND) �1 r WrLANDS ' i r . f � --, }) \ \ CEO �O�D�•--� '� 1 `��\�"_: (- �, �"i Ek-'STREAM% 31 TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc o ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDER/CK COUNTY, t/lRG/N/A FIGURE 4 ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATION �� M-1Awl'; MACE��NIA �- �9; A T EXISTING PLANNED INTERSECTION 1 5' I3l 14' •6' 6' ` 14' IA V 40 FC 70 FC '� WSwKEK� I F�,. p71Y 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY TASKER WOODS II` TRANSPORTATION PLAN O O O Cb FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 33 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY (40' FC TO FC) I Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE 5 • 0 AUG 2 1 2'06 (= through the Canter Estates development. Special provisions for access to the Macedonia Church are planned to allow for full functional use of this facility as a part of entrance planning to the future improved section of Macedonia Church Road. The Tasker Woods development pattern proposes a single entrance along the portion of Macedonia Church Road identified as a major collector. An Additional connection is provided to Tasker Road at a planned location where an entrance was installed as a part of regional transportation planning. This connection will be the primary access for business and commercial acreage associated with the rezoning and will also provide access to the residential portion of the project as well. Details regarding edge treatment for the cemetery, entrance buffers and screens, and onsite church improvements have been agreed upon by the Church and applicant and shall be included as proffered conditions for the project. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) indicates that the proposed rezoning of both residential and commercial portions of the Property would result in a total of 12,846 new vehicle trips per day. Trip distributions indicated that the majority of the traffic (609/6) will travel North on Front Royal Pike. The remaining trips will head either South on Front Royal Pike (15%o) or West on Tasker Road (25%) towards Interstate 81 and the 37 Bypass. When paired with 2010 background traffic from both existing and planned development projects, the TIA indicates that in order to meet a level of service C or better, signalization will be needed at four intersections: 1) Tasker Road and White Oak Road 2) Tasker Road and Front Royal Pike 3) Macedonia Church Road and Front Royal Pike 4) Tasker Road and Marcel Drive The rezoning of the Eastgate Industrial Park and Commerce Center provides for the signalization of Tasker Road and Front Royal Pike when warranted by VDOT. Additionally, a signal at the intersection of White Oak Road and Tasker Road was proffered as part of the Cedar Meadows application, thereby making the proposed development responsible for the signalization of: 1) Macedonia Church Road and Front Royal Pike 2) Tasker Road and Marcel Drive. The TIA also indicates that turn lanes are needed at the signalized intersection of Tasker Road and White Oak Road. These improvements were not included with the signal proffered by as part of the Cedar Meadows application. As such, the Applicant has proffered $500 dollars per single family, attached unit and $1000 per single family, detached unit that could be used in conjunction with the revenue sharing program to provide the turn lanes or to help fund other transportation improvements along Tasker Road. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND WATER SUPPLY Presently sewer service is available via an 8" main that travels to the south of this project by a pump station installed adjacent to Tasker Road as a part of the Eastgate project. A new pump station will be needed and is shown on Figure 6. 3 i jr � Sic' �tirrF � I! �• MACEDONIA G TASKER WOODS UTILITY PLAN fREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINU CTATrrW = ` - � 11jt F PROPOSED FORCE MAIN ' F �+ EX. PUMP STATION Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE 6 • 0 An analysis of run times on the existing pump station and scheduled additions to the pump station would indicate additional capacity is available for this project. Using a standard rate of 200 gallons per day/dwelling unit and 200 gallons per day/1,000 square feet of commercial floor area, it is projected that the proposed development would produce approximately 99,600 gallons per day of sewer flow. Wastewater generated by this project will be transferred to the Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility which is currently being expanded from 2 to 5 MGD by the FCSA and FWSA. This project will have a scheduled and minor impact on sewage impact flows and connection fee income as recently increased by the FCSA will provide for capacity expansion as planned for the Urban Development Area. Water supply is provided by way of a 12" water main located along the western boundary of this site which serves as a loop connection along U.S. Route 522 through Albin to a connection with the 20" transmission main located near the Papermill Road intersection with Route 522. Water demand of the project would be equivalent to its sewer production of 99,600 gallons per day. Current waterpressures in the area are acceptable to serve the proposed uses. The proposal would have a manageable impact on operating characteristics. The primary water source for this development is the Stephens City quarry system through the James Diehl Water Treatment Facility augmented by both the City of Winchester connection to the transmission main from Middletown and by the Northern Water Plant at Clearbrook in cases where needed. There is adequate capacity to serve this development in diose systems and charges for water service connections allow mitigation by the FCSA on facility improvements needed. DRAINAGE Figure 7 shows a preliminary plan for storm water management for this site. Of note is the use of existing ponds for wet storm water management facilities and additional storm water management facilities will be installed in the general location shown. This site will be served by enclosed storm sewer of modern design and will meet the State of Virginia requirements for storm water management. As previously noted, there are no special impacts of drainage on adjacent properties. Of note are the properties to the north and east of the project where a small portion of the drainage shed discharges to adjacent lands. Special precautions will be made in all places where direct discharge leaves the site to first concentrate the discharge back into the site for purposes of management and secondly, to mitigate the effects of impacts that may be created by the increased intensity of land use for this project. There are no special issues which require offsite improvements noted as a part of this analysis. 11 ,) "AL "-\ � ` J i , J s � , 11-2 r PEND EX P Il X SWM i ♦■ DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTI❑N YVIV/VW.' P❑SSIBLE ST❑RMP❑NDS m TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, PC STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 O O O Q VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, WRGINIA FIGURE 7 0 SOLID Waste The following table shows a projection of solid waste generation as a part of this project. Unit Type Units Waste Generation Total Waste lbs Single Family Detached 120 12 lbs/day 1,440 Single Family Attached 199 9 lbs/day 2,388 Office Space 179,000 square feet 25 lbs/1,000 s .ft. 4,475 Total 8,303 Requirement of curbside pick-up will be an improvement to solid waste issues associated with increased dumpster use in the County. HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify any structures of historic importance on the subject site. Moreover, pursuant to the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia, the subject site is not included in any battlefield study area and does not contain any core battlefield resources. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES The mixed use nature of this proposed rezoning will help mitigate the fiscal impacts associated with providing services to the residential component of the project. However, the Applicant has proffered to fully mitigate the projected impacts of the residential development as a definitive phasing schedule for the commercial portion of the project has yet to be determined. Specifically, the Applicant has proffered to contribute $24,290 per single family detached unit and $18,231 per single family attached unit at the time building permit. The total contribution exceeds the County Impact Model by $500 dollars per unit for single family, attached uses and $1,000 per unit for single family, detached uses and is proffered to be allocated as follows: ■ Fire and Rescue: ■ General Government: ■ Public Safety: ■ Library: ■ Parks and Recreation: ■ School Construction: ■ Transportation: Single Family Detached $720.00 per unit $320.00 per unit $658.00 per unit $267.00 per unit $2,136.00 per unit $19,189.00 per unit $1,000.00 per unit Single Family Attached $528.00 per unit $245.00 per unit $503.00 per unit $204.00 per unit $1,634.00 per unit $14,618.00 per unit $500.00 per unit TOTAL: $24,290.00 per unit $18,231.00 per unit 0 10 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Eno neers. Surveyors, Planners. LmdsccpeArchitects.JUL 2 1 2006 PMa lnsburft Avenue, Suite 200 RA 54H F 304.264. 67W West Virginia 25401 Addendum To: Susan Eddy Organization/Company: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project file Number: Frederick County Planning Michael Glickman, PE July 11, 2006 An Addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods 14076-1-0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared an addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Woods, by PHR+A, dated January 18, 2006. The purpose of this document is to present revised traffic impact analyses due to modifications to the proposed development land uses. The revised development is to include 120 single-family detached units, 199 townhouse units and 179,000 square feet of retail (formerly 179,000 square feet of office). Revised analyses are provided for 2010 build -out traffic conditions. All analyses and methodology are consistent with the January 2006 report. TRIP GENERATION PHR+A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 71h Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 1 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Tasker Woods development. Table 1 Proposed Development: Tasker Woods Trip Generation Summary 1 F 1: Code Land Use :lmount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 Single -Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 230 Townhouse/Condo 199 units 15 74 90 71 35 106 1,731 820 Retail 179,000 SF 135 87 222 441 478 919 9,915 Total Tri s 194 231 405 1 592 560 1,151 1 12 846 Page 1 of 11 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 2 of 7 The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Tasker Woods development. PHR+A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 1 to assign the proposed Tasker Woods trips (Table 2) throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 2 shows the respective development -generated ADT and AM/PM peak hour trip assignments. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Tasker Woods assigned trips (Figure 2) were then added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (consistent with the January 2006 report) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 3 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 4 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 9 Landscape Architects • 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc as Figure 1 Trip Distribution Percentages Addendum To; Susan Eddy Page 3of7 Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 4of7 No Scale Ono �l n a d Macedoma r (2$ Church Rd �3(96i J8 Macedonia Church Rd Site -Drive 0 SITE a Ana J9"'� �o b %�skcrROnd � 484Ro�� (14N)43 �1 �g4)35WOy AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) nT Try +A ' Figure 2 Development -Generated Trip Assignments Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 5 of 7 No Scale ^ " 0 ()54a (3030)41 r � r N W M v 1 N N 1 �Z(I) �rf Macedonia Church Rd M1y (6J (5)3 (6)13 oy �1� s J yb1 `,1 Macedonia Church Rd Sitc-Drive 0 SITE 5 �a (6j94Jg3 901-) TatAej•Jd_�� Rrt' >11031 ' (7 035\%t i f42)ro �► N �► 1�9 aN o WONN �� bti AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) TJ I ■-T TP A \ , Figure 3 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc No Scale edoni,i *(B)B .A ! ► Unsignalized Intersection �2s,(er R07d s �B(A)* Signalized "Suggested .nfersection Improvements" Signaliwtion LOS=C(C) SI1 - Right Turn r�skerRoald O 13(C v U 4- Unsignalized Intersection J11 *(D)CI Ott Unsignalized Intersection � �r 4 �* * SITE � � Unsignaed i Intersectilizon 4 � G intersection Improvements" (C) Signnli7 un LOS=C SR - 1 Left WR- I Riehl i ' t Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 6 of 7 Jtgnaltzefl "Suggested [nterseetlon Improvements" LOS=C(C) I Signaliwtion Signalized "Suggested EntOrsCctiOn Gnprovemenls" LOS=C(C) Signaliwtion (C)C I% 11 I Unsignalized 1 Intersectwn *� r Oor (r) WON * Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 4 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects • is Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc CONCLUSION Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 7 of 7 The traffic impacts associated with the revised Tasker Woods development are acceptable and manageable. All intersections, except Tasker Road/Mercel Drive intersection, would maintain levels of service consistent with the January 2006 report. The improvements suggested at the intersections of Route 522/Tasker Road, Route 522/Macedonia Church Road and White Oak Road/Tasker Road are consistent with the January 2006 report. The following reiterates the suggested intersection improvements. • Route 522/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization will be required. • Route 522/Macedonia Church Road: Traffic signalization will be required. • White Oak Road/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound right -turn lane will be required. • Mercel Drive/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound left -turn lane and westbound right -turn lane will be required. Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tastier Woods Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Morlyn LLC 22A Ricketts Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc En j neers . Surveyors. Planners. Lrndscape Architects. p ][� 300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200 Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401 01 H +A T 304.264.2711 F 304.264.3671 February 2, 2006 • ft OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Tasker Woods development located along the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Route 522/Tasker Road in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed development is to be comprised of 120 single- family detached units, 199 townhouse units and 179,000 square feet of office. Access will be provided via Route 522, Tasker Road and Macedonia Church Road. Build -out will occur over a single transportation phase by the year 2010. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed Tasker Woods development with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the Tasker Woods development were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • ' Assessment of background traffic including growth rates and other planned projects in the area of impact, • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Tasker Woods development, • Distribution and assignment of the Tasker Woods development generated trips onto the completed study area road network, Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of the highway capacity software, HCS-2000, for existing and future conditions. EXISTING CONDITIONS Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Route 522/Macedonia Church Road, Route 522/Clydesdale Drive, White Oak Road/Macedonia Church Road, White Oak Road/Tasker Road, Route 522/Tasker Road and Mercer Drive/Tasker Road. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using an average "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 8% as determined from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data Figure 2 shows the existing ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Tra is Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods PRAProject Number: 14076-1-0 H February 2, 2006 Page 1 • Ll No Scale - JJ F11j J3 t 2 SITE Figure 1 Vicinity Map - Tasker Woods, Frederick County, Virginia A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods PH LProjectNumber: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 2 a No Scale o w� W N �l • ()54� It (3030)11 N N a N N � 60. Macedonia 1 2(6)� rj �� Church Rd r YOJs `s� (9)19MEMO cp (5)3 (6)13� 1 L L 1 ' I Macedonia Church Rd _ Site _I?ri�e i -'' SITE ;' 0a Grua ----• ti r\ m r S T `' TaskL-,, 28) I2(27) 8)200 ate,► (I3 )46- 5� h (1641Z 12'y �� `'5 AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) -P,r ,rP + / /� \ (' ' 1 1 Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions A D-affic Impact Analysis ofTasker Woods PAProject Number: 14076-1-0 H February 2, 2006 Page 3 No Scale Unsignalized Intersection 9 d Unsignalized * Intersection � Unsignalized Macedonia _ ' Intersection Church Rd Macedonia Site Church Rd " SITE "a "" Unsignalized Intersection Unsignalized ~ Intersection ized intersection l nction Taskeroad A(A)* * Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PHT21� A Traffic Impact Analysis ofTasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 4 1 i 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS PHR+A increased the existing traffic volumes along Route 522, Tasker Road and White Oak Road using a conservative annual growth rate of four percent (4%) per year through Year 2010 based upon published VDOT historical traffic count data. In order to incorporate trips associated with the specific future "other developments" located within the vicinity of the. proposed site, PHR+A utilized the following reports: 1) Traffic Impact Analysis for the Home Depot Distribution Center @ Eastgate, by Vettra Company, dated October 2002; 2) A Phased Traffic Impact Analysis of Crosspointe Center, by PHR+A, dated September 2003; 3) A Traffic Impact Analysis of Freedom Manor, by PHR+A, dated July 2004; 4) A Phased Traffic Impact Anal sy is o the Villa"es at Artrip, by PHR+A, dated December 2004 and 5) A Traffic Impact Analysis of Cedar Meadows, by PHR+A, dated April 2005., Based upon the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Table 1 to summarize the trip generation for the "other developments" surrounding the site. Figure 4 shows the 2010 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2010 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of. service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Tra.(tc Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 5 • C-1 Table 1 2010 "Other Developments " Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADZ, Background Development # 1 Home Depot Distribution Center - Phase 21 150 Warehousing 252,000 SF 65 14 79 21 62 82 927 Background Development # 2 The Shenandoah - Phase 27' -- Mixed Land Use -- 478 336 814 704 773 1,477 17,094 Background Development # 3 Development West of Site on Tasker Road 210 Single -Family Detached 300 Units 55 165 219 182 107 288 3,000 Background Development # 4 Wakeland Property 820 Retail 80,000 SF 84 53 137 259 281 540 5,874 Background Development # 5 #11 Elementary School and Admiral Byrd Middle School 520 Elementary School 640 stud. 110 76 186 2 5 6 826 522 Middle School 850 stud. 223 168 391 66 61 128 1,377 Background Development # 6 Freedom Manor 210 Single -Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 Background Development # 7 522 Ventures - 820 Retail 94,743 SF 92 59 152 290 314 604 6,557 (8.7 acers @ 0.25 FAR) Background Development # 8 Cedar Meadows 251 Elderly Housing - Detach 140 units 1 14 23 37 1 38 24 63 1 721 Note 1: The existing Home Depot Distribution Center will be expanded by 252,000 SF Note 2: Trip generation values are taken directly from the report: Home Depot Distribution Center @ Eastgate PH R+A A Tra is Impact Anal sy is of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 6 • Table 1 (cont.) 2010 "Other Developments' Trin (Veneration Summary Code Land Use Amount AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT In Out Total In Out Total Background Development # 9 Artrip (Phase 2) Land Bav A 210 Single -Family Detached 102 units 20 60 81 69 40 109 1,017 230 Townhouse/Condo 438 units 29 140 168 135 67 202 3,811 820 Retail 10,000 SF 24 15 39 66 71 137 1,520 Land Bav B 210 Single -Family Detached 37 units 9 27 36 28 16 44 373 Land Bav C 488 Soccer Complex 3 field 2 2 4 43 19 62 214 Total Trips 1 84 244 328 1 340 214 554 1 6,935 Total Internal 1 1 2 16 16 31 107 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total "New Trips" 83 243 326 325 198 523 6,828 Background Development# 10 Crosspointe Center (Phase 2) 210 Single -Family Detached 775 units 138 414 552 435 245 679 7,750 230 Townhouse/Condo 200 units 15 74 89 73 36 109 1,740 253 Elderly Housing - Attach 100 units 4 3 7 6 4 10 348 710 Office 90,000 SF 151 21 171 31 150 180 1,224 820 Retail 440,000 SF 236 151 386 801 868 1,669 17,673 Total Trips 544 661 1,205 1 1,346 1,302 2,648 1 28,735 Total Internal 80 80 159 330 330 660 6,954 Total Pass -by 29 29 58 125 125 250 2,651 Total "New Trips" 435 553 988 890 847 1,737 19,130 Total Background Tripsl 1,661 1,761 3,423 1 2,856 2,718 5,575 1 63,534 PHR-I� A Traffic Impact Analysis oifasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 7 0 N No Scale o� (42)54�.%� (30)41 r N 1 N W N d M 1 i �Z-10 rlll Macedonia rj8 Jac Church Rd aJso9 (9)19= I9(I8) (5)3 (6)13 a I j2 s M ry ��8 rj2 J 9J r r r Macedonia ChurchRd i r o SITE fir r66 b r13o �o� o `l � OT ¢1 orre � � �.�?o2J ntr P r TaskerRoa d� �3(33, (622�243i`78(.z6�4j) �792 (42,60 'p o. AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) I. � nT Try-�-n - Figure 4 2010 Background Traffic Conditions PHP,,,-+A AA Traffic Impact Analysis of Woods Analysis ofTasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 8 • • No Scale "Suggested Improvements" Signalization SB - Right Turn Un Intersection Intersection Unsignalized Intersectr f r f Site -Drive/ t SITE f /''Unsignalized Intersection 21 tsker a? Road (73)).A4 ACA)* "Suggested Improvements" Signalization Unsignalized Intersection * Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 5 2010 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Tra['tc Impact Analysis ofTasker Woods PRAProject Number: 14076-1-0 H February 2, 2006 Page 9 • a TRIP GENERATION PHR+A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7tb Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 2 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Tasker Woods development. Table 2 Proposed Development: Tasker Woods Trin Generation Summary ITE Land Use Code Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 Single -Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 230 Townhouse/Condo 199 units 15 74 90 71 35 106 1,731 710 Office 179,000 SF 263 36 299 47 232 279 2,089 Total Tri s 302 180 482 198 313 511 5,020 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Tasker Woods development. PHR+A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed Tasker Woods trips (Table 2) throughout the study area. Figure 7 shows the respective development -generated ADT and AM/PM peak hour trip assignments. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Tasker Woods assigned trips (Figure 7) were then added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AA/1/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AAI/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 10 0 • r Figure 6 Trip Distribution Percentages A Traftrc bnvact Analysis ofTasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 11 t`I No Scale 0 Macedonia SITE b^1 100, b`9s a ,U ti �kerR�i 1 (20)3 p oadf�� (47) (3p)45� � j'r. AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 7 Development -Generated Trip Assignments P�IR/� A Tra is Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 12 • 61" W No Scale o a; Gl N (73)72 a 1A (30)41 r L' � w a � d M ^ N oil( J/ 1 1 r �fr Macedonia Church Rd zol9 (6)13 rs8 err Macedonia Church Rd Site-DriVe SITE a a �66'3JQs Jlo�� O 7 .�i ✓ p ��'f E � � rm l-skerRoa �� �4S(33) f 0 (652)273 V► 1��18(2G)94) i )837 do AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) T Figure 8 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis ofTasker Woods PAProject Number: 14076-1-0 H February 2, 2006 Page 13 I No Scale uwipalized Intersection * Denotes critical unsignalized movement __D TQ+ A AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 9 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service PHTt1� A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 14 • E CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the proposed Tasker Woods development are acceptable and manageable. The intersections of Route 522/Tasker Road, Route 522/1\4acedonia Church Road and White Oak Road/Tasker Road will maintain constrained peak hour levels of service "F" during both 2010 background and build -out conditions, suggesting ,a negligible impact from the proposed development. Improvements are suggested for the aforementioned intersections to maintain acceptable levels of service "C" or better, as shown in Figures 5 and 9, during 2010 background and build -out conditions, respectively. The unsignalized intersections of Route 522/Clydesdale Drive and Tasker Road/Mercer Drive will maintain levels of service "D" or better during build -out conditions. Signalization at these intersections will likely not be warranted. The following reiterates the suggested intersection improvements. • Route 522/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization will be required. • Route 522/Macedonia Church Road: Traffic signalization will be required. • White Oak Road/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound right -turn lane will be required. A Traffic Impact Analysis of Tasker. Woods Project Number: 14076-1-0 February 2, 2006 Page 15 CONS❑LIDATE CHURCH ENTRANCES TO SINGLE ACCESS P❑INT o IR❑N FENCE \\1 0 C❑MMUNITY CENTER & POCKET PARK �. (3 Ac) V� q � .SF REZONE F 18,897 USEi CID TASKER WOODS II` \ \It 0 0 \ C GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EREX-RICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA NOT z Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE . 0 46 AUG 2 1 %' ?6 9 r Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. RA 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 PH T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To: Susan Eddy Organization/Company: Frederick County Planning AUG 2 1 2006 From: Patrick Sowers Date: August 21, 2006 Project Name/Subject: Tasker Woods Susan, I've attached the following documents pertaining to the Tasker Woods rezoning application: 1) Revised Proffer Statement dated August 18, 2006. 2) Revised Page 1 of Impact Analysis Statement. 3) Revised Figures 2 and 5 of the Impact Analysis Statement. Thanks, Patrick NOT CURRENT TASKER WOODS REZONING IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT August 2006 The Tasker Woods site is ideally suited for mixed use residential development. The project, comprised of parcels 76-A-49 and 76-A-48A, totals 79.178 Acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) and is located along the eastern boundary of the Urban Development Area in the Opequon Magisterial District. By action of the County Board of Supervisors on July 13, 2005 the project area was included in the Urban Development Area and Sewer and Water Service Area (see Figure 1) thereby allowing for this rezoning petition which seeks to rezone 18.897 acres of land to B2 (General Business) with the remaining 60.281 acres of the site becoming RP (Residential Performance) (Figure 2). The rezoning would result in a high quality mixed use development with single family attached and detached uses with a proffered maximum of 319 dwelling units. The site is surrounded by primary and major collector roadways providing for excellent transportation characteristics. The site has a high elevation of 722.10 feet and a low elevation of 690.0 feet with a general cross slope of 2% to 5%. Characteristic of most properties within the Martinsburg shale areas of Frederick County, this site was intensively farmed at some point, but no farming has occurred on the site for at least 20 years. This site is overgrown by cedars and scrub brush which is characteristic of land that has been taken out of basic agriculture. Site drainage is afforded by a tributary to Wrights Run which traverses the site from west to east along with a minor drainage shed which leaves the site to the north and east. The principle land use surrounding the site is single family residential with some institutional and church uses. The area to the south is predominantly the Eastgate Industrial Park which is a developing center for economic growth in Frederick County. The site is underlain by Martinsburg shale which has been very suitable for the development of residential communities within the Urban Development Area. Site utilities traverse the site including a major water main loop owned by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Sanitary sewer is available to the south as a part of the Eastgate Industrial Park. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES As mentioned, the principle use surrounding this site is residential. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph from 2001 depicting the typical developed uses in the vicinity of the site. The predominate use to the north of the site is the Macedonia Methodist Church facilities including a new church together with the old chapel facility and community building and graveyard. To the north and west is older established single family homes along Macedonia Church Road and Canter Estates which is a part of the Tasker area land bays and approaching build out of single family homes. To the south and west are a single family home and a small farm together with lands planned for business and industrial uses including 1 Qr) (a� Q M- / NOT CURRENT TASKER WOODS GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY. WRGINIA Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE 2 wraK n 40 FC 7Q fC ur 80' RIGHT—❑F—WAY / �MACEV41I ' � J1 ADDITI❑NAL ROW DEDICATI❑N • EXISTING PLANNED INTERSECTI❑N 14• WALK40' r C 70 FC 60' ROW 60' RIGHT-❑F-WAY w TASKER WOODS o Cn. TRANSPORTATION PLAN Cb FREDERICK COUNTY, �IRGINM NOT CURR1q l � 1 p 60' RIGHT-❑F-WAY a^ (40' FC TO FC) I Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE 5 • 9 TASKER WOODS REZONING NOT CURRENT IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT April 2006 The Tasker Woods site is ideally suited for mixed use residential development. The project, comprised of parcels 76-A-49 and 76-A-48A, totals 79.18 Acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) and is located along the eastern boundary of the Opequon Urban Development Area. By action of the County Board of Supervisors on July 13, 2005 this project was included in the Urban Development Area and Sewer and Water Service Area (see Figure 1) thereby allowing for this rezoning petition which seeks to rezone 18.89 acres of land to B2 (General Business) with the remaining 58.08 acres of the site becoming RP (Residential Performance) (Figure 2). The rezoning would result in a high quality mixed use development with single family attached and detached uses for a maximum of 319 dwelling units. The site is surrounded by primary and major collector roadways providing for excellent transportation characteristics. The site has a high elevation of 722.10 feet and a low elevation of 690.0 feet with a general cross slope of 2% to 5%. Characteristic of most properties within the Martinsburg shale areas of Frederick County, this site was intensively farmed at some point, however in at least the last 20 years, no farming has occurred. This site is overgrown by cedars and scrub brush which is characteristic of land taken out of basic agriculture. Site drainage is afforded by a tributary to Wrights Run which traverses the site from west to east along with a minor drainage shed which leaves the site to the north and east. The principle land use surrounding the site is single family residential with some institutional and church uses. The area to the south is predominantly the Eastgate Industrial Park which is a developing center for economic development in Frederick County. The site is underlain by Martinsburg shale which has been very suitable for the development of residential communities within the Urban Development Area. Site utilities traverse the site including a major water main loop owned by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Sanitary sewer is available to the south as a part of the Eastgate Industrial Park. SURROUNDING PROPERTIES As mentioned, the principle use surrounding this site is residential. Figure 3 shows an aerial photograph from 2001 depicting the characteristic developed uses in the vicinity of the site. The predominate use to the north of the site is the Macedonia Methodist Church facilities including a new church together with the old chapel facility and community building and graveyard. To the north and west is older established single family homes along Macedonia Church Road and Canter Estates which is a part of the Tasker area land bays and approaching build out of single family homes. To the south and west are a single family home and a small farm together with lands planned for business and industrial uses including � jai 1✓1� v ` 9 A% owl aas ow o L X sooZ aunt • lj"o ZOO ueld ash pun spooM lamsel bsMs ZZ9 p#,o d 1ja11oJ�Ut� ~�416• �6 • R P ZZ9 q � Q saq" I leulsnpul sweaJlS --^� a dS uodp speoN AiepuooaS n, , sseutsng speoa tiewud IequopisaH spent{ asnpue-1 van slaved VSMs �vsnns wow Vo0 FIGURE 2 FIGURE 3 11 NOT CURRENT the Eastgate Industrial Park. To the east are large lot residential uses generally fronting on Route 522. The suggested land use plan was created during the UDA expansion process and shows a hierarchical transition of residential intensities with single family detached uses turning to single family attached prior to the transition to the commercial land bay. This plan provides for a more appropriate transition from the single family uses in the surrounding area to the proposed commercial and existing commercial and industrial areas South of the Property. The site generally drains to a principle tributary of Wrights Run and away from existing residential uses. Design of the project should include special provisions for improvement and mitigation of drainage issues that may arise. Special consideration in design should be given to the existing Macedonia United Methodist Church Road in order to enhance and preserve the church property and function. Also the improvement of White Oak Road as a major collector to create a more appropriate connection with Route 522. ENVIRONMENT Figure 4 is provided to delineate the important environmental features in accordance with County policy and procedures. Of note are wetlands, steep slopes, and other special environmental features. None of the above listed environmental factors presents a particularly difficult planning impact for development of this site. Sensitive use of these areas will produce a meaningful open space plan. The Property is sparsely wooded and includes limited wetlands. The National Wetlands Inventory indicates that wetlands on the site are limited to two ponds on the site, one near the northern property line adjacent to Front Royal Pike as well as a pond situated closer to the Southern boundary of the property near Tasker Road. Any wetlands that may exist along stream channels located on the site will be protected by both riparian buffers as well as an open space plan that provides an additional buffer for these environmental features. There are no special issues regarding previous development on the site that require mitigation. TRAFFIC A complete transportation impact analysis has been prepared and is attached as "Appendix A" Of significance is a plan suggested in the Urban Development Area expansion process which includes a weak link minor collector connection between Tasker Road and White Oak Road as shown on attached Figure 5. By locating this minor collector roadway adjacent to the east property line of the project it affords direct access by future development of properties to the east which primarily front on U.S. Route 522 where intersections should be discouraged. Improvement of White Oak Road to a major collector status in accordance with the Eastern Road Plan is provided by proffer for this project. It includes improvement of the roadway along the frontage of Macedonia Church Road. The initial part of this improvement has 2 q` y. b O O O J 1 ; 1 W�L ANDS � r ll t �\ R� 1 \ 1 \ WETLANDS J`J `--\`wE "NDS (EX POND) f - ` 1 \ <Ep�D� ►���\ - ,- \� i S TASKER WOODS ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES FREDERICK COUNTY, �IRGINIA M- C-arIJOT UENT Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE 4 80' RIGHT-OF-WAY u r 4w. MACEDUNI/A r. ADDITIONAL ROW DEDICATION 60, R� 1 li 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY (40' FC TO FC) j� EXISTING PLANNED i INTERSECTIONas 419D 60' RIGHT-OF-WAY TASKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc li o TRANSPORTATION PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St, Winchester, Virginia 22601 O O O VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, �IRGINA FIGURE 5 r� U • NOT CURRENT been accomplished in the Canter Estates Master Plan and construction drawings. Special provisions for access to the Macedonia Church need to be planned to allow for full functional use of this facility as a part of entrance planning to this new road. One new connection to this new road is proposed as a part of development planning for Tasker Woods in accordance with Macedonia United Methodist Church. Also a connection is afforded to Macedonia Church Road resulting in a better intersection condition and a connection is provided to Tasker Road at a location already planned and for which an entrance has been installed as a part of regional transportation planning. This connection will be the primary access for business and commercial zoning which is a part of this application and provide access to the residential portion of the project. Details regarding edge treatment for the cemetery, entrance buffers and screens, and onsite church improvements have been agreed upon by the Church and applicant and shall be included as proffered conditions for the project. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) indicates that the proposed rezoning of both residential and commercial portions of the Property would result in a total of 12,846 new vehicle trips per day. Trip distributions indicated that the majority of the traffic (60%) will travel North on Front Royal Pike. The remaining trips will head either South on Front Royal Pike (159/0) or West on Tasker Road (259/6) towards Interstate 81 and the 37 Bypass. When paired with 2010 background traffic from both existing and planned development projects, the TIA indicates that in order to meet a level of service C or better, signalization will be needed at four intersections: Tasker Road and White Oak Road, Tasker Road and Front Royal Pike, White Oak Road and Front Royal Pike, and Marcel Drive and Tasker Road. The rezoning of the Eastgate Industrial Park and Commerce Center provides for the signalization of Tasker Road and Front Royal Pike when warranted by VDOT. Additionally, a signal at the intersection of White Oak Road and Tasker Road was proffered as part of the Cedar Meadows application, thereby making the proposed development responsible for the signalization of Route 522 and Macedonia Church as well as Tasker Road and Marcel Drive.. In recognition of the importance of the Tasker Road corridor and future transportation improvements needed in the area, the Applicant has proffered $500 dollars per single family, attached unit and $1000 per single family, detached unit for a maximum of $219,500 that could be used in conjunction with the revenue sharing program. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND WATER SUPPLY Presently sewer service is available via an 8" main that travels to the south of this project by a pump station installed adjacent to Tasker Road as a part of the Eastgate project. A new pump station will be needed and is shown on Figure 6. An analysis of run times on the existing pump station and scheduled additions to the pump station would indicate additional capacity is available for this project. Using a standard rate of 200 gallons per day/dwelling unit and 200 gallons per day/1,000 square feet of commercial floor area, it is projected that the proposed development would produce approximately 99,600 gallons per day of sewer flow. Wastewater generated by this project will be transferred to the Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Facility which is being expanded from 2 to 5 MGD by the FCSA and FWSA at this writing. This project will have a scheduled and minor impact on sewage impact flows and connection fee income as 3 MACED��N�P `v i b I m- twT0010,11r, X. PUMP STATION I J 1 / PROPOSED FORCE MAIN S -Moe we� N� p F 4} F PROPOSED FORCE MAIN F�. 6. T� EX. PUMP STATION T,4SKER WOODS Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc II' O o UTILITY PLAN 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, V/RG/N/A FIGURE 6 • NOT CURRENT a scheduled and minor impact on sewage impact flows and connection fee income as recently increased by the FCSA will provide for capacity expansion as planned for the Urban Development Area. Water supply is provided by way of a 12" water main located along the western boundary of this site which serves as a loop connection along U.S. Route 522 through Albin to a connection with the 20" transmission main located near the Papermill Road intersection with Route 522. Water demand of the project would be equivalent to its sewer production of 99,600 gallons per day. Current water pressures in the area are acceptable to serve the proposed uses. The proposal would have a manageable impact on operating characteristics. The primary water source for this development is the Stephens City quarry system through the James Diehl Water Treatment Facility augmented by both the City of Winchester connection to the transmission main from Middletown and by the Northern Water Plant at Clearbrook in cases where needed. There is adequate capacity to serve this development in those systems and charges for water service connections allow mitigation by the FCSA on facility improvements needed. DRAINAGE Figure 7 shows a preliminary plan for storm water management for this site. Of note is the use of existing ponds for wet storm water management facilities and additional storm water management facilities will be installed in the general location shown. This site will be served by enclosed storm sewer of modern design and will meet the State of Virginia requirements for storm water management. As previously noted, there are no special impacts of drainage on adjacent properties. Of note are the properties to the north and east of the project where a small portion of the drainage shed discharges to adjacent lands. Special precautions will be made in all places where direct discharge leaves the site to first concentrate the discharge back into the site for purposes of management and secondly, to mitigate the effects of impacts that may be created by the increased intensity of land use for this project. There are no special issues which require offsite improvements noted as a part of this analysis. SOLID Waste The following table shows a projection of solid waste generation as a part of this project. Unit Type Units Waste Generation Total Waste lbs Sin le Family Detached 120 12 Ibs/day 1,440 Single Family Attached 199 9 lbs/day 2,388 Office Space 179,000 square feet 25 lbs/1,000 s .ft. 4,475 Total 8,303 Requirement of curbside pick-up will be an improvement to solid waste issues associated with increased dumpster use in the County. 4 EX K) 1 0 -'o J/K N'Q NOT CURRENT (Im ti til''j (w,%� �V , ♦■ DRAINAGE FLOW DIRECTION POSSIBLE ST❑RMPONDS , TASKER WOODS \ \(b o STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN O O % Q FREDERICK COUNTY, KRG/N/A Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, Pc 117 E. Picadilly St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 FIGURE 7 0 • NOT CURRENT HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify any structures of historic importance on the subject site. Moreover, pursuant to the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley of Virglnla, the subject site is not included in any battlefield study area and does not contain any core battlefield resources. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES The mixed use nature of this proposed rezoning will help mitigate the fiscal impacts associated with providing services to the residential component of the project. However, the Applicant has proffered to fully mitigate the projected impacts of the residential development as a definitive phasing schedule for the commercial portion of the project has yet to be determined. Specifically, the Applicant has proffered to contribute $24,290 per single family detached unit and $18,231 per single family attached unit at the time building permit. The total contribution exceeds the County Impact Model by $500 dollars per unit for single family, attached uses and $1,000 per unit for single family, detached uses and is proffered to be allocated as follows: Single Family Detached ■ Fire and Rescue: ■ General Government: ■ Public Safety: ■ Library: ■ Parks and Recreation: ■ School Construction: ■ Transportation: Single Family Attached $720.00 per unit $320.00 per unit $658.00 per unit $267.00 per unit $2,136.00 per unit $19,189.00 per unit $1,000.00 per unit TOTAL: $24,290.00 per unit ■ Fire and Rescue: ■ General Government: ■ Public Safety: ■ Library: ■ Parks and Recreation: ■ School Construction: ■ Transportation: $528.00 per unit $245.00 per unit $503.00 per unit $204.00 per unit $1,634.00 per unit $14,618.00 per unit $500.00 per unit TOTAL: $18,231.00 per unit 5 0 LEW January 2006 Tasker Woods II. IMPACT ANALYSIS Jaimmy 2006 0 10 Tasker Woods APPENDIXA. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS 0 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200 304.264.2711 PH Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401 F 304.264.3671 Addendum To: Susan Eddy Organization/Company: Frederick County Planning From: Michael Glickman, PE Date: July 11, 2006 An Addendum to: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the Tasker Project Name/Subject: Woods PHR+A Project file 14076-1-0 Number: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared an addendum to: A Traffic I171pact Anall,sis of the Tasker Woods, by PHR+A, dated January 18, 2006. The purpose of this document is to present revised traffic impact analyses due to modifications to the proposed development land uses. The revised development is to include 120 single-family detached units, 199 townhouse units and 179,000 square feet of retail (formerly 179,000 square feet of office). Revised analyses are provided for 2010 build -out traffic conditions. All analyses and methodology are consistent with the January 2006 report. TRIP GENERATION PHR+A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 1 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the Tasker Woods development. Table 1 Proposed Development: Tasker Woods Trip Generation Summary ITE Land Use Code Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT 210 Single -Family Detached 120 units 23 70 93 80 47 126 1,200 230 Townhouse/Condo 199 units 15 74 90 71 35 106 1,731 820 Retail 179,000 SF 135 87 222 441 478 919 9,915 Total Tri s 174 231 405 592 560 1,151 1 12,846 Page 1 of 11 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 2of7 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Tasker Woods development. PHR+A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 1 to assign the proposed Tasker Woods trips (Table 2) throughout the study area roadway network. Figure 2 shows the respective development -generated ADT and AM/PM peak hour trip assignments. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The Tasker Woods assigned trips (Figure 2) were then added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (consistent with the January 2006 report) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 3 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 4 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are provided in the Appendix section of the report. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects • • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc so Figure 1 Trip Distribution Percentages Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 3 of 7 Engineers • Surveyors • Planners . Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 4of7 No Scale b J v �l J Q Macedon] r2 Church Rd �23cs, 8 Macedonia Church Rd Site -Drive I O SITE �J lJ l � �yL dal j m b r0 4sker Road i� 3484 ea 7 J t (148)43 `w* �sah5� w� ■TJ AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 1. ■-T TP+ /A� \ • 1 Figure 2 Development -Generated Trip Assignments Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners 9 Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 5of7 No Scale o a j �%� (1(11151 v N .oi w J � M N N 1 Macedonia 21�I� Church Rd �� 1f6� 4 8f3�9 (�yi (9)19�%t (5)3mwm.# /♦ (6)13� I ty N jay l2 s r�8 rl? ti �ryj N J yatil�^11 Macedonia Church Rd Site -Drive 0 SITE�J N 0a (6J'%J9'�� d3J,`� 4� �9J �20J Tas/erR0,7 �� �41> load 3� (� 3�353 r`18(16� 31 S` (42)60 d+ � 16 12�)�) `b (61 W AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) A 1 T _P+A , Figure 3 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc No Scale Q edonia h a O.� Q Unsignnlized Intersecti0 T,'iske O rROtd Signalized "66"" Improvements" intersection Signali7nlion LOS=C(C) SB - Ri it Turn � a OR Tacker R 'd 3��8(C) U U 4- Unsignnlized Intersection � � J* �J SITE �� Unsignnlized Intersection G Signalized I�uggestea Intersection Improvements" LOS=C(C) Signnliintion SB - 1 Lett WB -IRight yr. J�Cj • Addendum TO: Susan Eddy Page 6of7 .6'igntlllzet1 "Suggested intnutinn I.t r.vemews" LOS=C(C) I Signali7ntion i k§ +N Or, J G,G L "Suggested Improvements" Signalirntion � w (Qc wo,% Unsignnlized Intersection (�) 00% Denotes critical unsignalized movement AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Figure 4 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 0 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc CONCLUSION Addendum To: Susan Eddy Page 7 of 7 The traffic impacts associated with the revised Tasker Woods development are acceptable and manageable. All intersections, except Tasker Road/Mercel Drive intersection, would maintain levels of service consistent with the January 2006 report. The improvements suggested at the intersections of Route 522/Tasker Road, Route 522/Macedonia Church Road and White Oak Road/Tasker Road are consistent with the January 2006 report. The following reiterates the suggested intersection improvements. • Route 522/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization will be required. • Route 522/Macedonia Church Road: Traffic signalization will be required. • White Oak Road/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound right -turn lane will be required. • Mercel Drive/Tasker Road: Traffic signalization and separate southbound left -turn lane and westbound right -turn lane will be required. Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects APPENDIX 0 0 HCS 2000 Worksheets 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISIte Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Mercer Drive & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 nal sis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 43 850 10 30 419 26 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 45 894 10 31 441 27 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 6 0 16 35 0 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 6 0 16 36 0 36 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach y Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 45 31 22 72 C (m) (veh/h) 1088 748 465 404 lc 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.18 95% queue length 0.13 0.13 0.15 0.64 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 10.0 17.6 19.0 LOS A B C C Approach Delay (s/veh) -- 17.6 19.0 Approach LOS -- -- C C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:23 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Mercer Drive & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 148 667 23 32 1020 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 155 702 24 33 1073 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 26 0 34 84 0 84 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 27 0 35 88 0 88 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach Y Y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delav, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR v (veh/h) 155 33 62 176 C (m) (veh/h) 596 872 142 lc 0.26 0.04 1.24 95% queue length 1.03 0.12 10.52 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.1 9.3 214.8 LOS B A F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 214.8 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:23 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates • • 7/11/2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Mercer Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR LT R LTR L TR Volume, V (vph) 43 850 10 30 419 26 6 0 16 35 0 35 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 1 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 45.0 G= G= G= 8.0 G= 12.0 G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 45 906 473 27 23 37 37 Lane Group Capacity, c 479 1151 892 882 234 385 392 v/c Ratio, X 0.09 0.79 0.53 0.03 0.10 0.10 0.09 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.63 0.63 0.56 0.56 0.15 0.25 0.25 Uniform Delay, di 6.8 11.1 10.9 7.8 29.3 23.0 23.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.33 0.13 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 3.7 0.6 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 6.9 14.8 11.5 7.8 29.5 23.1 23.1 Lane Group LOS A B B A C C C Approach Delay 14.4 11.3 29.5 23.1 8 B C C Patton Harris Rust Associates 0 • 7/ 11 /2006 Approach LOS T Intersection Delay 14.1 X� = 0.65 Intersection LOS 8 Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:20 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates • a 7/11/2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Mercer Drive Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timinq Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 Lane Group L TR LT R LTR L TR Volume, V (vph) 148 667 23 32 1020 89 26 0 34 84 0 84 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A I A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 1 2.0 2.0 12.0 12.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 1 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 51.0 G= G= G= 5.0 G= 9.0 G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= I Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 156 726 1108 94 63 88 88 Lane Group Capacity, c 202 1285 1137 1000 157 236 274 v/c Ratio, X 0.77 0.56 0.97 0.09 0.40 0.37 0.32 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.70 0.70 0.64 0.64 0.11 0.17 0.17 Uniform Delay, d1 20.0 6.0 13.9 5.6 33.0 31.7 28.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.32 0.16 0.48 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 16.7 0.6 20.7 0.0 1.7 1.0 0.7 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 36.8 6.5 34.6 5.6 34.7 32.7 29.5 Lane Group LOS D A C A C C C Approach Delay 11.9 32.3 34.7 31.1 e C C C Patton Harris Rust Associates • . 7/11/2006 Approach LOS Intersection Delay 24.5 X,� = 1.04 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:20 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 6 40 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Ch`"c `hurch RJR '"'a`"UUV'11Q C Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions nalysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 12 1095 769 137 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 12 1152 0 0 809 144 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 300 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 315 0 16 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh/h) 12 331 C (m) (veh/h) 711 265 lc 0.02 1.25 95% queue length 0.05 16.01 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.2 178.4 LOS B F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 178.4 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:24 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information n,...a,, Cl)') o ee,,,.,,,4--;., Analyst PHR+A Intersection Churc J`G IV"""c""" Il' Church R Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour 1 1 i Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 38 1243 1112 478 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 40 1308 0 0 1170 503 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 541 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 569 0 17 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh/h) 40 586 C (m) (veh/h) 375 167 vlc 0.11 3.51 95% queue length 0.36 56.28 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.7 1185 LOS C F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- - 1185 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:23 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates • • 7/11 /2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timinq Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 2 2 1 Lane Group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 300 16 12 1095 769 137 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 1 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 11.000 1 1.000 11.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 36.0 G= 1 G= G= IY= IY= G= 10.0 G= 34.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 333 13 1153 809 144 Lane Group Capacity, c 700 314 1551 1199 1307 v/c Ratio, X 0.48 0.04 0.74 0.67 0.11 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.40 0.49 0.49 0.38 0.83 Uniform Delay, di 20.0 13.5 18.5 23.4 1.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.30 0.25 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 2.0 1.5 1 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 20.5 13.6 20.4 24.9 1.4 Lane Group LOS C B C C A Approach Delay 20.5 20.4 21.4 C C C Patton Harris Rust Associates a • 7/ 11 /2006 Approach LOS Intersection Delay 20.8 X = 0.62 Intersection LOS C Copyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:21 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates a . 7/ 11 /2006 HCS+'' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timinq Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 2 2 1 Lane Group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 541 17 38 1243 1112 478 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 1 1 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 36.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 34.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 587 40 1308 1171 503 Lane Group Capacity, c 701 277 1551 1199 1307 v/c Ratio, X 0.84 0.14 0.84 0.98 0.38 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.40 10.49 0.49 0.83 Uniform Delay, d1 24.4 16.9 20.0 L7.6 1.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.37 0.11 0.38 0.48 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 8.8 0.2 4.4 20.5 0.2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Control Delay 33.2 17.1 24.4 48.1 2.0 Lane Group LOS C B C D A Approach Delay 33.2 24.2 34.3 C C C Patton Harris Rust Associates • 7/ 11 /2006 Approach LOS Intersection Delay 30.3 X� = 0.84 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:21 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 289 802 904 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 304 844 0 0 951 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 169 705 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 177 0 742 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (veh/h) 304 177 742 C (m) (veh/h) 656 111 532 v/c 0.46 1.59 1.39 95% queue length 2.45 13.26 34.35 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.1 374.1 210.7 LOS C F F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 242.2 Approach LOS -- -- F Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:24 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information 15ite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 880 1299 1065 209 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 926 1367 0 0 1121 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 121 614 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 127 0 646 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R (veh/h) 926 127 646 C (m) (veh/h) 505 469 lC 1.83 1.38 95% queue length 58.56 30.16 Control Delay (s/veh) 402.4 207.0 LOS F F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS -- -- Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:25 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates • . 7/ 11 /2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timinq In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 2 2 1 Lane Group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 169 705 289 802 904 89 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 1 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 11.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 1 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 14.0 G= G= G= G= 35.0 G= 31.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 C cle length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 178 742 304 844 952 41 Lane Group Capacity, c 273 941 763 2327 1093 871 v/c Ratio, X 0.65 0.79 0.40 0.36 0.87 0.05 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.16 10.60 0.73 0.73 0.34 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 35.7 13.7 10.3 4.4 27.6 9.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.23 0.34 0.11 0.11 0.40 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 5.5 4.6 0.3 0.1 7.8 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 41.2 18.2 10.7 4.5 35.5 9.2 Lane Group LOS D B 8 A D A Approach Delay 22.7 6.1 34.4 Approach LOS C A C Patton Harris Rust Associates 0 • 7/11/2006 IIntersection Delay I 20.2 I XC = 0.82 I Intersection LOS I C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:20 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates • • 7/ 11 /2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timinq Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 2 2 1 Lane Group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 121 614 880 1299 1065 209 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 11.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 10.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 D 1 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP F 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 5.9 G= G= G= G= 35.2 G= 30.9 G= G= IY= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 82.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 127 646 926 1367 1121 167 Lane Group Capacity, c 126 882 842 2558 1196 799 We Ratio, X 1.01 0.73 1.10 0.53 0.94 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.07 0.56 10.81 0.81 0.38 0.51 Uniform Delay, d1 38.0 13.4 19.5 2.7 24.6 11.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.50 10.29 0.50 10.14 0.45 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 82.3 3.2 62.0 0.2 13.7 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 120.4 16.5 81.5 2.9 38.3 11.2 Lane Group LOS F 8 F A D 8 Approach Delay 33.6 34.6 34.8 Approach LOS C C C Patton Harris Rust Associates Intersection Delay I 34.5 • X = 1.40 I Intersection LOS C 7/11/2006 Copyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:19 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/11/2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information iniH;+ n n nn d . Analyst PHR+A Intersection """"c ""f% ­" U" Church R Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 4 324 31 1 233 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 4 341 32 1 245 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 19 3 13 42 2 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 20 3 13 44 2 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 4 1 48 36 C (m) (veh/h) 1313 1180 396 485 vlc 0.00 0.00 0.12 0.07 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.41 0.24 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 8.1 15.3 13.0 LOS A A C B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 15.3 13.0 Approach LOS -- -- C B Copyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:26 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISIte Information nal st PHR+A Intersection """"C; ""� 1V1C"'""'111" Church R Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions ,Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour -- I 1 i Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 10 202 42 4 313 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 10 212 44 4 329 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 9 5 6 74 6 1 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 9 5 6 77 6 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 2 0 FIT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR (veh/h) 10 4 84 20 C (m) (veh/h) 1213 1303 401 460 V/c 0.01 0.00 0.21 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.78 0.14 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 7.8 16.3 13.2 LOS A A C B Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.3 13.2 Approach LOS - -- C B Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:26 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information It I IA/h;#- n-1. 0nn 4 D 7-,,L,-, Analyst PHR+A Intersection Road vQ" ' JVQU � ' GJ'" oaLd Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 243 835 60 18 427 15 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 255 878 63 18 449 15 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- 3 - -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 39 98 40 29 114 152 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 41 103 42 30 120 160 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 17 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR v (veh/h) 255 18 186 310 C (m) (veh/h) 1092 724 0 0 v/c 0.23 0.02 95% queue length 0.91 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 10.1 LOS A B F F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- - Approach LOS -- -- Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:26 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/11/2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Rooaa(d v d %-'a^ I luau « 1 aoncl Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions nal sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 127 770 42 26 1031 33 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 133 810 44 27 1085 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 46 69 13 15 154 230 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 42 72 13 15 162 242 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR (veh/h) 133 27 127 419 C (m) (veh/h) 620 781 0 0 lC 0.21 0.03 95% queue length 0.81 0.11 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.4 9.8 LOS 8 A F F Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS -- -- Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+Tm Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:27 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates db • 7/ 11 /2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane Group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 243 835 60 18 427 15 39 98 40 29 114 152 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 10.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 1 3.2 3.2 3.2 t 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 55.0 G= G= G= G= 25.0 G= G= G= Y= 5 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 270 995 494 17 196 159 169 Lane Group Capacity, c 463 1116 866 958 446 467 436 v/c Ratio, X 0.58 0.89 0.57 0.02 0.44 0.34 0.39 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.28 0.28 0.28 Uniform Delay, d1 10.6 15.0 10.4 6.9 126.7 25.9 26.3 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.17 0.42 10.16 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 1.9 9.3 0.9 0.0 0.7 0.4 0.6 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 12.5 24.2 11.4 6.9 27.4 26.4 26.9 Lane Group LOS B C B A C C C Approach Delay 21.7 11.2 27.4 26.6 C B C C Patton Harris Rust Associates a • 7/ 11 /2006 Approach LOS Intersection Delay 20.6 1 X� = 0.75 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:19 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/ 11 /2006 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timinq Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane Group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 127 770 42 26 1031 33 40 69 13 15 154 230 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 1 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 4.0 G= 50.7 G= G= G= 15.3 G= G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 134 855 1112 35 126 178 242 Lane Group Capacity, c 181 1251 1136 994 206 341 476 v/c Ratio, X 0.74 0.68 0.98 0.04 0.61 0.52 0.51 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.68 0.68 0.63 0.63 0.19 0.1.9 0.30 Uniform Delay, di 18.1 7.5 14.1 5.5 29.6 29.1 22.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.30 0.25 0.48 0.11 0.20 0.13 0.12 Incremental Delay, d2 15.0 1.6 21.7 0.0 5.3 1 1.5 0.9 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 33.1 9.1 35.8 5.5 34.9 30.5 23.8 Lane Group LOS C A D A C C C Approach Delay 12.3 34.9 34.9 26.7 B C C C Patton Harris Rust Associates • • 7/11/2006 Approach LOS Intersection Delay 25.3 X� = 0.97 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:18 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 7/11/2006 ift Is TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISIte Information 11 0....4.. nal st PHR+A Intersection "v`"C '" " "'y""""'G Drive Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions ,Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour ---------- - 1 1 i Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 11 1381 856 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 11 1453 0 0 901 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 54 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 56 0 43 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach y N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 11 99 C (m) (veh/h) 717 530 V/c 0.02 0.19 95% queue length 0.05 0.68 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.1 16.4 LOS B C Approach Delay (s/veh) - -- 16.4 Approach LOS -- -- C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:17 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates 0 • 7/ 11 /2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information rno o Analyst PHR+A Intersection I IV ll l6 JGG " VIyuuouulu Drive Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour 1 1 i Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 26 1753 1553 139 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 27 1845 0 0 1634 146 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 -- -- 0 -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 42 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h 44 0 31 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 2 0 2 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach y N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (veh/h) 27 75 C (m) (veh/h) 345 228 lc 0.08 0.33 95% queue length 0.25 1.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 16.3 33.3 LOS C I I D Approach Delay (s/veh) -- -- 33.3 Approach LOS -- -- D Copyright© 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.2 Generated: 7/11/2006 5:17 PM Patton Harris Rust Associates C� F", I I APPENDIX F] I 0 C p ri 0 HCS-2000 Worksheets D I P., P TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods FtsUWest Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 ersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 78 425 0 0 493 57 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 82 447 0 0 518 60 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 75 0 272 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 78 1 0 286 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration 7 L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 82 78 286 C (m) (vph) 985 379 737 v/c 0.08 0.21 0.39 95% queue length 0.27 0.76 1.84 Control Delay 9.0 16.9 12.9 LOS A C B Approach Delay -- -- 13.8 Approach LOS -- -- B Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 2/2/2006 r r1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 283 629 0 0 544 94 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 297 662 1 0 0 1 57 1 98 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 1-- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 61 0 164 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 64 0 172 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration T L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 297 64 172 C (m) (vph) 909 175 708 v/c 0.33 0.37 0.24 95% queue length 1.43 1.56 0.95 Control Delay 10.9 37.0 11.7 LOS B E g Approach Delay -- -- 18.6 Approach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved IICS2000TM Version 4.1 d Copyright Q 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d P"i 2/2/2006 Ab Ah P- TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 601 0 0 365 38 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 j 632 0 0 384 1 40 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 127 0 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 133 1 0 1 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 10 146 C (m) (vph) 1125 487 v/c 0.01 0.30 95% queue length 0.03 1.25 Control Delay 8.2 15.5 LOS A C Approach Delay -- -- 15.5 Approach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved I-ICS2000T t" t Version 4.1 d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i? i? nnr, TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY J General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd FtNorth/S outh Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 31 545 0 0 505 140 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 32 j 573 0 0 531 147 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 163 0 14 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 0 1 0 171 0 14 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 32 185 C (m) (vph) 903 411 v/c 0.04 0.45 95% queue length 0.11 2.27 Control Delay 9.1 20.7 LOS A C Approach Delay -- -- 20.7 Approach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved IICS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Version 4.1d 9/9/9nnC) TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Clydesdale Agency/Co. PHR+A Drive Date Performed 12/7/2005 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 717 0 0 362 33 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 754 0 0 381 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 54 0 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 1 0 56 0 1 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 11 99 C (m) (vph) 1133 969 v/c 0.01 0.10 95% queue length 0.03 0.34 Control Delay 8.2 11.2 LOS A g Approach Delay -- -- 11.2 pproach LOS -- -- g Rights Reserved F(CS2000T tit Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d rn Am mqw TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Clydesdale Drive Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 26 682 0 0 615 80 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 717 0 0 1 647 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 42 0 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 44 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 27 75 C (m) (vph) 863 736 V/c 0.03 0.10 95% queue length 0.10 0.34 Control Delay 9.3 12.8 LOS A g ,Approach Delay -- -- 12.8 pproach LOS -- -- g 1<jghtts Reserved FICS2000TM Version 4.Id Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d ?/?/?nnh TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection White Oak & Macedonia Agency/Co. PHR+A Church R Date Performed 12/7/2005 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 261 22 1 188 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 274 23 1 1 1 197 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 19 2 2 19 3 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 2 2 20 3 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 4 1 24 36 C (m) (vph) 1367 1259 483 566 v/C 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.06 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.16 0.20 Control Delay 7.6 7.9 12.8 11.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay -- -- 12.8 11.8 Approach LOS -- -- B B bights Reserved FICS2000T M Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection White Oak & Macedonia Agency/Co. PHR+A Church R Date Performed 12/7/2005 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 160 12 4 248 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 168 12 4 261 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 18 6 1 9 5 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 6 1 9 5 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 10 4 25 20 C (m)(vph) 1284 1389 494 547 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.05 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.16 0.11 Control Delay 7.8 7.6 12.7 11.8 LOS A A B B Approach Delay -- -- 12.7 11.8 Approach LOS -- -- B B (j Rights Reserved �] F(CS2000TM Version 4.1d ?/?/?nnh Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction nalvsis Year White Oak Road & Tasker 2005 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 200 259 46 14 140 12 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 210 272 48 14 147 12 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -' Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 26 75 31 24 90 106 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 27 78 32 25 94 111 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration I LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 210 14 137 230 Capacity, cm (vph) 1414 1234 225 328 v/c ratio 0.15 0.01 0.61 0.70 Queue length (95%) 0.52 0.03 3.53 5.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 8.0 43.1 38.1 LOS A A E E Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 43.1 38.1 pproach LOS -- -- E E 2/2/2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY neral Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction nalvsis Year White Oak Road & Tasker Road 2005 Existino Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods _ East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 104 138 25 18 228 27 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 109 145 26 18 240 28 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 27 51 9 12 117 143 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 28 53 9 12 123 1 150 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR ILTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 109 18 90 285 Capacity, cm (vph) 1290 1400 265 484 v/c ratio 0.08 0.01 0.34 0.59 Queue length (95%) 0.28 0.04 1.45 3.74 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 7.6 25.4 22.5 LOS A A D C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 25.4 22.5 Approach LOS -- -- D C 20.19.006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 nalysis Time Period M Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction nalvsis Year cer Drive & Tasker Road 5 Existing Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 305 8 25 160 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 321 8 26 168 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 1 0 1 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 0 16 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 6 0 16 0 0 1 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 26 22 Capacity, cm (vph) 1225 671 v/c ratio 0.02 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.07 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 10.5 LOS A B Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 10.5 Approach LOS -- -- B 7 HCS2000TM Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d fi TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction nalvsis Year Mercer Drive & Tasker Road 2005 Existinq Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 173 19 26 285 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 182 20 27 300 1 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 26 0 34 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 27 0 35 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 27 62 Capacity, cm (vph) 1364 701 v/c ratio 0.02 0.09 Queue length (95%) 0.06 0.29 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 10.6 LOS A e Approach delay (s/veh) A _-----L I „tom I -- -- 10.6 — Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved P TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stticiv PPrind (hrc). n 2f, Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 263 802 0 0 904 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 276 844 0 0 951 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- __ 0- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 169 0 670 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 177 0 1 705 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 276 177 705 C (m) (vph) 656 124 532 V/C 0.42 1.43 1.33 95% queue length 2.09 12.11 30.34 Control Delay 14.4 297.2 181.8 LOS B F F pproach Delay -- -- 205.0 Approach LOS -- __ F lUgI s tceservea IICS2000TM Version 4.1 d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 2/2/2006 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 3eneral Information Site Information knalyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road kgency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction )ate Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions \nalysis Time Period PM Peak Hour 'roject Description Tasker Woods ast/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 ntersection Orientation: North -South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 791 1299 0 0 1065 209 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 832 1367 0 0 1121 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 121 0 530 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 127 0 557 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration I I L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 832 127 557 C (m) (vph) 505 469 v/C 1.65 1.19 95% queue length 47.45 20.96 Control Delay 320.6 131.6 LOS F F ,Approach Delay -- -- pproach LOS -- -- Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d i9 i1) nn(� • D I C n 1 T HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 169 670 263 802 904 89 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 1 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 30.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 35.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 178 705 277 844 952 94 Lane group capacity, c 618 830 309 1680 1307 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.29 0.85 0.90 0.50 0.73 0.07 Total green ratio, g/C 0.35 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.41 0.82 Uniform delay, di 19.8 17.1 17.4 12.8 21.0 1.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.38 0.42 0.11 0.29 0.11 o /1) /0 nnl< a i Incremental delay, d2 lffiw� 0.3 8.3 w 26.8 0.2 2.1 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 20.1 25.4 44.2 13.1 23.1 1.4 Lane group LOS C C D 8 C A Approach delay 24.4 20.8 21.2 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 21.9 XC = 0.80 Intersection LOS C HCS 000"-`'t Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e a a P P-1 i� r Ll HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 121 530 791 1299 1065 209 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 9.0 G= G= G= G= 33.0 G= 33.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= I Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 127 558 833 1367 1121 220 Lane group capacity, c 186 867 767 2464 1232 867 v/c ratio, X 0.68 0.64 1.09 0.55 0.91 0.25 Total green ratio, g/C 0.11 0.55 0.78 0.78 0.39 0.55 Uniform delay, di 36.6 ]13.2 21.5 3.7 24.6 9.9 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.25 0.22 0.50 0.15 0.43 0.11 o i1) io nnr, r7 P, Incremental delay, d2 9.8 1.6 58.4 0.3 10.1 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 46.5 14.8 79.9 4.0 34.7 10.0 Lane group LOS p 8 E A C 8 Approach delay 20.7 32.7 30.7 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 30.1 Xc = 1.30 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.le ?i?i?nn(I Alk Ah TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/7/2005 AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Route 522 & Macedonia Church R 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 12 1095 0 0 769 50 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 1152 0 0 809 52 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 161 0 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 1 0 0 169 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 1 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration ILR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 12 185 C (m) (vph) 770 271 v/c 0.02 0.68 95% queue length 0.05 4.54 Control Delay 9.7 42.7 LOS A E Approach Delay -- -- 42.7 Approach LOS -- -- E Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r Ah TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/7/2005 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Route 522 & Macedonia Church R 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 38 1243 0 0 1112 182 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 1308 0 0 1 1170 1 191 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 206 0 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 216 0 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 40 233 C (m) (vph) 496 174 V/c 0.08 1.34 95% queue length 0.26 13.74 Control Delay 12.9 237.2 LOS B F Approach Delay -- -- 237.2 pproach LOS -- -- F Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d P� 9/9/?nnh r1 a HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year Con Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 161 16 12 1095 769 50 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= I G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 186 13 1153 809 53 Lane group capacity, c 513 402 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.36 0.03 0.62 0.54 0.04 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, di 23.7 8.4 11.3 16.0 1.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 o io i1) nn1< r1 Ah Delay calibration, k N 0.11 0.11 0.20 0.14 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.4 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 24.1 8.5 11.9 16.4 1.4 Lane group LOS C A B B A Approach delay 24.1 11.9 15.5 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 14.3 X = 0.53 c Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000"' Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e F11 0 0 n HCS2000'm DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/8/2005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year Con Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 206 17 38 1243 1112 182 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= I Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 235 40 1308 1171 192 Lane group capacity, c 513 294 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.46 0.14 0.70 0.78 0.15 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, di 24.5 10.9 12.3 18.9 1.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1)i1)i1)nnr, r� • Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.27 0.33 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 0.7 0.2 1.2 2.8 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 25.1 11.1 13.5 21.7 1.6 Lane group LOS C 8 8 C A Approach delay 25.1 13.4 18.9 Approach LOS C g g Intersection delay 16.9 Xc = 0.62 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e ?IoI,)nnr, r f TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Clydesdale Agency/Co. PHR+A Drive Date Performed 121712005 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South 1Studv Perind (hrsl• n 2.5 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 1243 0 0 769 33 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 1308 0 0 1 809 1 34 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- __ 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 54 0 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 56 0 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Dela , Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SIB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 11 gg C (m) (vph) 782 589 v/c 0.01 0.17 95% queue length 0.04 0.60 Control Delay 9.7 15.2 LOS A C Approach Delay -- -- 15.2 Approach LOS -- -- C tcignts tceservect HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d ?/?/?nnr) Ah Ah P TWO-WAY STOP CONTROLS iTmMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/7/2005 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year D rive 522 &Clydesdale Drive 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 26 1417 0 0 1257 80 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1491 0 0 1323 1 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 42 0 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 44 1 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 1 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0. 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 27 75 C (m) (vph) 476 329 v/c 0.06 0.23 95% queue length 0.18 0.86 Control Delay 13.0 23.1 LOS B C Approach Delay -- -- 23.1 Approach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved I-ICS2000TM Version 4.1 d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Ah r_1 fl TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/7/2005 AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year White Oak & Macedonia Church R 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 324 22 1 233 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 341 23 1 245 1 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR4 LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 19 2 2 19 3 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 20 2 2 20 1 3 1 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 4 1 24 36 C(m)(vph) 1313 1189 407 488 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.07 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.19 0.24 Control Delay 7.8 8.0 14.4 13.0 LOS A A B 8 Approach Delay -- -- 14.4 13.0 Approach LOS -- -- B B Rights Reserved liCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d 1)i1)i9nn1� TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection White Oak & Macedonia Agency/Co. PHR+A Church R Date Performed 12/7/2005 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 202 12 4 313 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 212 12 4 329 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 18 6 1 9 5 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 18 6 1 9 5 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 10 4 25 20 C (m) (vph) 1213 1339 418 471 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.06 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.19 0.13 Control Delay 8.0 7.7 14.2 13.0 LOS A A B B pproach Delay -- -- 14.2 13.0 Approach LOS -- -- B B Rights Reserved F/CS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright (0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d 1)i1)i1)nnr, 2 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY jGeneral Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 nalysis Time Period M Peak Hour r Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road Intersection Orientation: East-West 4 { j r I Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume (veh/h) 243 792 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 255 83 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 Median type RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 t Lj Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) 39 98 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 41 103 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 Flared approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 Configuration LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service JApproach EB WB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L LT Volume, v (vph) 255 18 Capacity, cm (vph) 1126 753 v/c ratio 0.23 0.02 J Queue length (95%) 0.87 0.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.1 9.9 LOS A A Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- i ! i1) i1) W) Intersection White Oak Road & Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions orth/South Street: White Oak Road tudv Period (hrs): 0.25 0 I• I• I• I• Undivided I 1 0 - I Southbound I• I• I• I• I I I I Northbound • .• • F I I I F s Approach LOS I -- I --1 1 (� HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d r 1] iq J d DGeneral Information l; TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information nalyst PHR+A gency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road Intersection Orientation: East-West D n {�!; ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume (veh/h) 127 622 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 133 654 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- Median type RT Channelized? Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 D Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) 40 69 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 42 72 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 Flared approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 1 Configuration LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L LT Volume, v (vph) 133 27 Capacity, cm (vph) 671 894 v/c ratio 0.20 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.73 0.09 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.7 9.2 LOS B A A roach dela (s/veh) I-- -- PP Y u-j o io io nn� Intersection White Oak Road & Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions orth/South Street: White Oak Road tudv Period (hrs): 0.25 3 4 R L 42 26 0.95 0.95 44 27 -- 3 Undivided 0 0 0 TR LT 9 R 13 0.95 13 10 L 15 0.95 15 Westbound 5 6 T R 947 33 0.95 0.95 996 34 0- Southbound I F 12 )Approach LOS HCS2000T NI Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id 1) i1) i1) nn(I i • 0 r I L� HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year Con Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LTR Volume, V (vph) 243 792 60 18 393 15 39 98 40 29 114 129 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 1 G= 35.0 G= G= IG= 5.0 G= 25.0 G= G= Y= 0 IY= 5 Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 256 897 433 16 186 287 Lane group capacity, c 418 966 555 830 462 586 v/c ratio, X 0.61 0.93 10.78 0.02 10.40 0.49 Total green ratio, g/C 0.53 0.53 0.41 0.53 0.29 0.35 Uniform delay, d, 13.0 18.5 21.7 9.5 24.0 21.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1) i1) i1) nnr, L1 Delay calibration, k 1 0.20 10.44 0.33 10:11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d 2 2.7 14.8 7.1 0.0 0.6 0.6 Initial queue delay, d 3 Control delay 15.7 33.3 28.7 9.5 24.6 22.2 Lane LOS group B C C A C C Approach delay 29.4 28.0 24.6 22.2 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 27.7 XC = 0.81 Intersection LOS C HCS2000rM Copyright Q 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e r a, I n c HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year Con Background Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 127 622 42 26 947 33 40 69 13 15 154 174 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 j 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 ::d 0 0 0I 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 1 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 67.0 G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 110.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 134 699 1024 35 129 178 183 Lane group capacity, c 147 1196 1093 955 348 456 542 v/c ratio, X 0.91 0.58 0.94 0.04 0.37 0.39 0.34 Total green ratio, g/C 0.65 0.65 0.61 0.61 0.25 0.25 0.35 Uniform delay, di 29.5 10.6 19.6 8.6 33.7 33.9 26.7 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1)i1)1r)nn(I Ah Ah q� Delay calibration, k M 0.43 0.18 0.45 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 48.8 0.7 14.6 0.0 0.7 0.6 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 78.3 11.4 34.1 8.6 34.4 34.5 27.0 Lane group LOS E 8 C A C C C Approach delay 22.1 33.3 34.4 30.7 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 29.1 Xc = 0.83 Intersection LOS C HCS2000 "`'' Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 nal sis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction ,Analysis Year Mercer Drive & Tasker Road 2010 Background Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 850 10 30 419 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 894 10 31 441 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 0 16 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 6 0 16 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 31 22 Capacity, cm (vph) 748 337 v/c ratio 0.04 0.07 Queue length (95%) 0.13 0.21 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.0 16.4 LOS B C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 16.4 Approach LOS -- __ C 1 -11 I AdIlk TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A 11C1 Sec1U1 Mercer Drive & I asKer Road Jurisdiction Agency/Co. PHR+A Analysis Year C on Background Conditions Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour � � I Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 0 667 23 32 1020 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 702 24 33 1073 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration T R LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 26 0 34 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 27 0 35 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR Volume, v (vph) 33 62 Capacity, cm (vph) 872 318 v/c ratio 0.04 0.19 Queue length (95%) 0.12 0.71 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.3 19.0 LOS A C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 19.0 pproach LOS -- -- C 91919 nr, 0 9L 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 308 802 0 0 904 89 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 324 844 0 0 1 951 93 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 169 0 698 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 177 0 734 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 1 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 324 177 734 C (m) (vph) 656 102 532 V/c 0.49 1.74 1.38 95% queue length 2.75 14.09 1 33.47 Control Delay 15.7 440.1 204.4 LOS C F F Approach Delay -- -- 250.2 pproach LOS -- -- F Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d oioionn� Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY 1� General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 522 & Tasker Road Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 821 1299 0 0 1065 209 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 864 1367 0 0 1 1121 220 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 121 0 577 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 127 0 607 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration L R Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L R v (vph) 864 127 607 C(m)(vph) 505 469 v/c 1.71 1.29 95% queue length 51.20 26.00 Control Delay 348.4 173.0 LOS F F pproach Delay -- -- pproach LOS -- -- I Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d Version 4.1d 1) i1) i1) n A A I P_ Pj I HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 169 698 308 802 904 89 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 27.0 G= G= G= G= 13.0 G= 35.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 178 735 324 844 952 94 Lane group capacity, c 557 830 371 1792 1307 1236 v/c ratio, X 0.32 0.89 0.87 0.47 0.73 0.08 Total green ratio, g/C 0.32 0.53 0.56 0.56 0.41 0.79 Uniform delay, d, 22.0 17.7 18.9 11.0 21.0 2.0 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.41 0.40 0.11 0.29 0.11 r) ir) 101)nK Incremental delay, d2 0.3 11.3 19.9 0.2 2.1 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 22.4 29.0 38.8 11.2 23.1 2.1 Lane group LOS C C D B C A Approach delay 27.7 18.8 21.2 Approach LOS C B C Intersection delay 22.2 X c = 0.82 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved r P. I D_ HCS2000T" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 121 1577 1821 1299 1065 209 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 1 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 8.0 G= G= G= G= 34.0 G= 33.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 127 607 864 1367 1121 220 Lane group capacity, c 165 867 788 2501 1232 849 v/c ratio, X 0.77 0.70 1.10 0.55 0.91 0.26 Total green ratio, g/C 0.09 0.55 0.79 0.79 0.39 0.54 Uniform delay, d, 37.6 13.9 21.2 3.3 24.6 10.4 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.32 0.27 0.50 0.15 10.43 PE a P15 Incremental delay, d2 19.6 2.5 61.7 0.3 10.1 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 57.2 16.4 82.9 3.6 34.7 10.6 Lane group LOS E 8 F A C 8 Approach delay 23.5 34.3 30.8 Approach LOS C C C Intersection delay 31.4 X = 1.36 c Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 e nininnnc r_1 Ah 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 121712005 AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Route 522 & Macedonia Church R 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods EasUWest Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 12 1095 0 0 769 201 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 12 1152 0 0 809 211 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- __ 0 -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 252 0 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 265 0 16 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration i ILR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 12 281 C (m) (vph) 670 267 v/C 0.02 1.05 95% queue length 0.05 11.18 Control Delay 10.5 111.1 LOS B F Approach Delay -- -- 111.1 pproach LOS -- -- F lugnts Keservea HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright O 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d ?i?i?nnr. TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 522 & Macedonia Agency/Co. PHR+A Church R Date Performed 12/7/2005 Jurisdiction nalysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume 38 1243 0 0 1112 281 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 40 1308 0 0 1170 295 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 362 0 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 381 0 17 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR (vph) 40 398 (m) (vph) 452 170 /c 0.09 2.34 5% queue length 0.29 33.02 Control Delay 13.7 664.E LOS B F Approach Delay -- -- 664.6 Approach LOS -- -- F 1Ughts Reserved IICS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright (D 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d 1)nionnr� Ah D 0 C MW XW HCS2000T"' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 252 16 12 1095 769 201 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 282 13 1153 809 212 Lane group capacity, c 514 402 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.55 0.03 10.62 0.54 0.16 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, di 25.3 8.4 11.3 16.0 1.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.15 0.11 0.20 0.14 0.11 ?l?l?nnr) a Ah Incremental delay, d2 1.3 0.0 0.6 0.4 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 26.5 8.5 11.9 16.4 1.6 Lane group LOS C A B B A Approach delay 26.5 11.9 13.3 Approach LOS C B B Intersection delay 14.2 X = c 0.59 Intersection LOS B 1ICS2000 ' Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e ?i?i?nrn; l 1 r-I HCS2000'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Macedonia Church & Route 522 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 Lane group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 362 17 38 1243 1112 281 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 14 14 3 Peak -hour factor, PH 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 399 40 1308 1171 296 Lane group capacity, c JO.77 515 294 1866 1493 1291 v/c ratio, X 0.14 0.70 0.78 0.23 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.82 Uniform delay, di 27.4 10.9 12.3 18.9 1.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.32 0.11 0.27 0.33 0.11 1) i1) in nnI-- rl n Incremental delay, d2 7.3 0.2 1.2 2.8 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 34.7 11.1 13.5 21.7 1.7 Lane group LOS C 8 8 C A Approach delay 34.7 13.4 17.7 Approach LOS C 8 8 Intersection delay 18.0 Xc = 0.73 Intersection LOS 8 HCS2000'm Copyright (D 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e 1) i1) i1) nn1< a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY P, [i General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/7/2005 AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Route 522 & Clydesdale Drive 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 11 1333 0 0 920 63 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 11 1403 0 0 1 968 66 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 1-- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 72 0 41 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 75 1 0 43 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I I LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 11 118 C (m) (vph) 662 447 v/c 0.02 0.26 95% queue length 0.05 1.05 Control Delay 10.5 18.6 LOS 8 C Approach Delay -- -- 18.6 pproach LOS -- -- C Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1 d Ilow] 1) io 10 nnrl Ab Ah TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed nalysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/7/2005 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Route 522 & Clydesdale Drive 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Clydesdale Drive North/South Street: Route 522 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 26 1574 0 0 1356 100 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 1 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 27 1656 1 0 0 1427 1 105 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 0 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 0 0 0 73 0 30 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 0 0 76 0 31 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (vph) 27 107 C (m) (vph) 426 239 v/c 0.06 0.45 95% queue length 0.20 2.15 Control Delay 14.0 34.5 LOS B D Approach Delay -- -- 34.5 Approach LOS -- -- D Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1d ?1?1?nnr) Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 12/7/2005 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection White Oak & Macedonia Church R Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 324 52 1 233 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 1 341 54 1 245 2 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 37 2 2 19 3 13 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 38 2 2 20 1 3 13 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 4 1 42 36 C(m)(vph) 1313 1158 391 477 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.08 95% queue length 0.01 0.00 0.36 0.24 Control Delay 7.8 8.1 15.3 13.2 LOS A A C B pproach Delay -- -- 15.3 13.2 pproach LOS -- -- C B Rights Reserved HCS2000TM Version 4.1 d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection White Oak & Macedonia Agency/Co. PHR+A Church R Date Performed 12/7/2005 Jurisdiction Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Macedonia Church Rd North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: North -South 1Studv Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 10 202 32 4 313 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 10 212 33 4 329 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 1 0 1 1 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 49 6 1 9 5 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 51 6 1 9 1 5 1 6 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 10 4 58 20 C(m)(vph) 1213 1315 406 465 v/c 0.01 0.00 0.14 0.04 95% queue length 0.02 0.01 0.49 0.13 Control Delay 8.0 7.7 15.3 13.1 LOS A A C B Approach Delay -- -- 15.3 13.1 Approach LOS -- -- C g I-aglits Keservect FICS2000TM Version 4.1 d Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id 1)i?i1)nn(1 n- I H 1 r -0 a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Millu vaK rceau � 1 aslcer Road genc /Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 273 837 60 18 420 15 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 287 881 63 18 442 15 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 39 98 40 29 114 147 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 41 103 42 30 120 1 154 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 287 18 186 304 Capacity, cm (vph) 1099 723 0 0 A ratio 0.26 0.02 Queue length (95%) 1.05 0.08 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.4 10.1 LOS A B F F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS -- -- 1) i1) i1) nn/,, Pi r G a TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection venire vaK Road & i asKer Road gency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour � � I Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: White Oak Road Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 146 652 42 26 994 33 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 153 686 44 27 1046 34 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L TR LT R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 40 69 13 15 154 205 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 42 72 13 15 162 215 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LT LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 153 27 127 392 Capacity, cm (vph) 642 869 0 0 v/c ratio 0.24 0.03 Queue length (95%) 0.92 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 12.4 9.3 LOS B A F F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- Approach LOS I -- -- 1) i1) i1) nnrl • r� F"i HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 273 837 60 18 420 15 39 98 40 29 114 147 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only EW Perm 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 40.0 G= G= G= 5.0 G= 20.0 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 287 944 461 16 186 151 155 Lane group capacity, c 471 1074 742 922 379 484 738 v/c ratio, X 0.61 0.88 0.62 0.02 0.49 0.31 0.21 Total green ratio, g/C 0.59 0.59 0.47 0.59 0.24 0.29 0.47 Uniform delay, d, 10.7 14.9 16.8 7.3 28.1 23.3 13.2 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.20 0.41 0.20 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 2.3 8.5 1.6 0.0 1 1.0 0.4 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 13.0 23.5 18.4 7.3 29.1 23.7 13.4 Lane group LOS g C 8 A C C 8 Approach delay 21.0 18.1 29.1 18.5 Approach LOS C 8 C 8 Intersection delay 20.7 X� = 0.84 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e r-7 F I.; 1 HCS2000" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121812005 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Tasker Road & White Oak Rd Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID Tasker Woods - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 Lane group L TR LT R LTR LT R Volume, V (vph) 146 652 42 26 994 33 40 69 13 15 154 205 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Lane width 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing E13 Only EW Perm 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 5.0 G= 62.5 G= G= G= 22.5 G= G= G= Y= 0 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 154 730 1073 35 129 178 174 Lane group capacity, c 162 1234 1122 980 283 402 510 v/c ratio, X 0.95 0.59 0.96 0.04 0.46 0.44 0.34 Total green ratio, g/C 0.68 0.68 0.63 0.63 0.22 0.22 0.32 Uniform delay, di 28.9 8.8 17.5 7.2 33.5 33.4 25.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.46 0.18 0.47 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 1) i1) i1) nnI,- Ab Incremental delay, d2 56.0 0.8 17.4 0.0 1.2 0.8 0.4 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 85.0 9.6 34.9 7.2 34.6 34.1 26.0 Lane group LOS F A C A C C C Approach delay 22.7 34.0 34.6 30.1 Approach LOS C C C C Intersection delay 29.4 Xc = 0.88 Intersection LOS C H(,,Y2000, "' Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Mercer Drive & Tasker Road Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Date Performed 121712005 Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Analysis Time Period M Peak Hour Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 45 850 10 30 419 45 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 47 894 10 31 441 47 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 0 16 27 0 27 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 6 0 16 28 0 28 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach y y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 47 31 22 56 Capacity, cm (vph) 1070 748 465 400 A ratio 0.04 0.04 0.05 0.14 Queue length (95%) 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.48 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 10.0 17.6 18.6 LOS A B C C Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 17.6 18.6 pproach LOS -- -- C C IICS2000T M Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 121712005 ,Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction nalvsis Year -cer Drive & Tasker Road 0 Build -out Conditions Project Description Tasker Woods East/West Street: Tasker Road North/South Street: Mercer Drive Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 30 667 23 32 1020 30 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 31 702 24 33 1073 31 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Raised curb RT Channelized? p D Lanes 0 1 1 0 1 0 Configuration LT R LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 26 0 34 47 0 47 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 27 0 35 49 0 49 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 3 3 3 3 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach y y Storage 1 1 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Control Delay, Queue Len th, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LTR LTR LTR Volume, v (vph) 31 33 62 98 Capacity, cm (vph) 629 872 280 330 v/c ratio 0.05 0.04 0.22 0.30 Queue length (95%) 0.16 0.12 0.83 1.22 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.0 9.3 26.5 28.9 LOS B A D p Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 26.5 28.9 Approach LOS -- -- D D HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.Id F Traffic Counts I 0 0 r Intersection: E-W: CLYDESDALE DR Weather dry File Name N-S: I ROUTE 522 Count By JJP Input Byl JJP Location IWINCHESTER,VA Count Date 12/1/2005 15 Minute EB: CLYDESDALE DR WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 5 0 6 11 0 0 0 0 2 118 0 120 0 54 6 60 191 7:00 7:15 8 0 Il 19 0 0 0 0 1 132 0 133 0 60 4 64 216 7:15 7:30 12 0 10 22 0 0 0 0 3 144 0 147 0 72 8 80 249 7:30 7:45 16 0 14 30 0 0 0 0 4 156 0 160 0 84 6 90 280 7:45 8:00 14 0 12 26 0 0 0 0 3 174 0 177 0 90 11 101 304 8:00 8:15 11 0 8 19 0 0 0 0 3 166 0 169 0 86 7 93 281 8:15 8:30 12 0 11 23 0 0 0 0 2 159 0 161 0 89 8 97 281 8:30 8:45 17 0 10 27 0 0 0 0 3 167 0 170 1 0 97 7 104 301 8:45 A.M. Total 95-0 82 177 0 0 0 0 21 1216 0 1237 0 632 57 689 1 2103 A.M. Total 16:00 10 0 5 15 0 0 0 0 5 144 0 149 0 134 12 146 310 16:00 16:15 14 0 7 21 0 0 0 0 6 148 0 154 0 140 12 152 327 16:15 16:30 11 0 4 15 0 0 0 0 8 155 0 163 0 135 19 154 332 16:30 16:45 14 0 5 19 0 0 0 0 5 166 0 171 0 139 21 160 350 16:45 17:00 10 0 11 21 0 0 0 0 1 184 0 185 0 156 19 175 381 17:00 17:15 7 0 8 15 0 0 0 0 8 172 0 180 0 144 24 168 363 17:15 17:30 I1 0 6 17 0 0 0 0 12 160 0 172 0 140 16 156 345 17:30 IT45 8 0 4 12 0 0 0 0 8 137 0 145 0 133 13 146 303 17:45 P.M. Total 85 0 50 135 0 0 0 0 53 1266 0 1319 1 0 1121 136 1257 27l 1 P.Ivf. Total 1 Hour EB: CLYDESDALE DR WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 41 0 41 82 0 0 0 0 10 550 0 560 0 270 24 294 936 7:00 7:15 50 0 47 97 0 0 0 0 11 606 0 617 0 306 29 335 1049 7:15 7:30 53 0 44 97 0 0 0 0 13 640 0 653 0 332 32 364 1114 7:30 7:45 53 0 45 98 0 0 0 0 12 655 0 667 0 349 32 381 1146 7:45 8:00 54 0 41 95 0 0 0 0 11 666 0 677 0 362 33 395 1167 8:00 16:00 49 0 21 70 0 0 0 0 24 613 0 637 0 548 64 612 1319 16:00 16:15 49 0 27 76 0 0 0 0 20 653 0 673 0 570 71 641 1390 16:15 16:30 42 0 28 70 0 0 0 0 22 677 0 699 0 574 83 657 1426 16:30 16:45 42 0 30 72 0 0 0 0 26 682 0 708 0 579 80 659 1439 16:45 17:00 36 0 29 65 0 0 0 0 29 653 0 682 0 573 72 645 1392 17:00 l Hour EB: CLYDESDALE DR WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thin Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 8:00 54 0 41 95 0 0 0 0 11 666 0 677 0 362 33 395 1167 8:00 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.88 PHF = PHF = 0.96 PHF = 0.95 0.96 A.M. Peak 16:45 42 0 30 72 0 0 0 0 26 682 0 708 0 579 80 659 1439 16:45 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.86 PHF = PHF = 0.96 PHF = 0.94 0.94 jP.M. Peak 17 4'. I p pli I t 11 11 Intersection: E-W: MACEDONIA CHURCH N-S: ROUTE 522 Location WINCHESTER,VA Weather dry File Name Count By JJP Input By JJP Count Date 12/5/2005 15 Minute EB: MACEDONIA CHURCH WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 12 0 3 15 0 0 0 0 2 116 0 118 0 48 3 51 184 7:00 7:15 16 0 3 19 0 0 0 0 1 129 0 130 0 59 3 62 211 7:15 7:30 24 0 6 30 0 0 0 0 4 140 0 144 0 74 6 80 254 7:30 7:45 27 0 2 29 0 0 0 0 3 149 0 152 0 80 8 88 269 7:45 8:00 34 0 5 39 0 0 0 0 2 150 0 152 0 77 12 89 280 8:00 8:15 29 0 4 33 0 0 0 0 3 146 0 149 0 79 10 89 271 8:15 8:30 34 0 2 36 0 0 0 0 3 155 0 158 0 83 8 91 285 8:30 8:45 30 0 2 32 0 0 0 0 2 150 0 152 0 86 8 94 1 278 8:45 A.M. Total 206 0 27 233 0 0 0 0 20 1135 0 1155 0 586 58 644 2032 A.M. Total 16:00 31 0 3 34 0 0 0 0 7 108 0 115 0 106 16 122 271 16:00 16:15 33 0 4 37 0 0 0 0 6 115 0 121 0 116 21 137 295 16:15 16:30 31 0 4 35 0 0 0 0 8 119 0 127 0 112 29 141 303 16:30 16:45 35 0 5 40 0 0 0 0 11 123 0 134 0 126 36 162 336 16:45 17:00 42 0 4 46 0 0 0 0 8 129 0 137 0 130 45 175 358 17:00 17:15 45 0 3 48 0 0 0 0 6 130 0 136 0 128 33 161 345 17:15 17:30 41 0 2 43 0 0 0 0 6 122 0 128 0 121 26 147 318 17:30 17:45 32 0 2 34 0 0 0 0 4 109 0 113 0 116 19 135 282 17:45 P.M. Total 290 0 27 317 0 0 0 0 56 955 0 1011 0 955 225 1180 2508 P.M.Total 1 Hour EB: MACEDONIA CHURCH WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thnt Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 79 0 14 93 0 0 0 0 10 534 0 544 0 261 20 281 918 7:00 7:15 101 0 16 117 0 0 0 0 10 569 0 578 0 290 29 319 1014 7:15 7:30 114 0 17 131 0 0 0 0 12 585 0 597 0 310 36 346 1074 7:30 7:45 124 0 13 137 0 0 0 0 11 600 0 611 0 319 38 357 1105 7:45 8:00 127 0 13 140 0 0 0 0 10 601 0 611 0 325 38 363 1114 8:00 16:00 130 0 16 146 0 0 0 0 32 465 0 497 0 460 102 562 1205 16:00 16:15 141 0 17 158 0 0 0 0 33 486 0 519 0 484 131 615 1292 16:15 16:30 153 0 16 169 0 0 0 0 33 501 0 534 0 496 143 639 1342 16:30 16:45 163 0 14 177 0 0 0 0 31 504 0 535 0 505 140 645 1357 16:45 17:00 160 0 11 171 0 0 0 0 24 490 0 514 0 495 123 618 1303 17:00 1 Hour EB: MACEDONIA CHURCH WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 8:00 127 0 13 140 0 0 0 0 10 601 0 611 0 325 38 363 1114 8:00 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.90 PHF = PHF = 0.97 PHF = 0.97 0.98 A.M. Peak 16:45 163 0 14 177 0 0 0 0 1 31 504 0 535 0 505 140 645 1357 16:45 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.92 PHF = PHF = 0.98 PHF = 0.92 0.95 P.M. Peak 11 I, i F 0 0 r r r r Intersection: E-W: TASKER RD N-S: MARCEL DR Location I WINCHESTER,VA Weather Dry File_Namel Count By J.1P Input By JJP Count Date 11/30/2005 15 Minute EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: MARCEL DR SB: 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining. 7:00 0 60 2 62 3 26 0 29 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 92 7:00 7:15 0 77 1 78 5 30 0 35 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 114 7:15 7:30 0 82 3 85 8 34 0 42 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 129 7:30 7:45 0 84 0 84 4 37 0 41 2 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 131 7:45 8:00 0 76 2 78 7 44 0 51 3 0 3 6 0 0 0 0 135 8:00 8:15 0 63 3 66 6 45 0 51 1 0 7 8 0 0 0 0 125 8:15 8:30 0 55 4 59 4 40 0 44 2 0 6 8 0 0 0 0 111 8:30 8:45 0 41 3 44 5 38 0 43 3 0 6 9 0 0 0 0 96 A.M. Total 0 538 18 556 42 294 0 336 12 0 29 41 0 0 0 0 933 A.M. A.M. Total 16:00 0 33 3 36 3 60 0 63 4 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 106 16:00 16:15 0 39 6 45 7 66 0 73 6 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 130 16:15 16:30 0 42 5 47 6 75 0 81 5 0 10 15 0 0 0 0 143 16:30 16:45 0 50 4 54 9 78 0 87 7 0 9 16 0 0 0 0 157 16:45 17:00 0 42 4 46 4 66 0 70 8 0 9 17 0 0 0 0 133 17:00 17:15 0 37 3 40 7 59 0 66 6 0 6 12 0 0 0 0 118 17:15 17:30 0 34 2 36 3 58 0 61 2 0 4 6 0 0 0 0 103 17:30 17:45 0 27 2 29 4 54 0 58 1 3 0 2 5 0 0 0 0 92 17:45 P.M. Total 0 304 29 333 43 516 0 559 41 0 49 90 0 0 0 0 982 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: MARCEL DR SB: 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 303 6 309 20 127 0 147 3 0 7 10 0 0 0 0 466 7:00 7:15 0 319 6 325 24 145 0 169 6 0 9 15 0 0 0 0 509 7:15 7:30 0 305 8 313 25 160 0 185 6 0 16 22 0 0 0 0 520 7:30 7:45 0 278 9 287 21 166 0 187 8 0 20 28 0 0 0 0 502 7:45 8:00 0 235 12 247 22 167 0 189 9 0 22 31 0 0 0 0 467 8:00 16:00 0 164 18 182 25 279 0 304 22 0 28 50 0 0 0 0 536 16:00 16:15 0 173 19 192 26 285 0 311 26 0 34 60 0 0 0 0 563 16:15 16:30 0 171 16 187 26 278 0 304 26 0 34 60 0 0 0 0 551 16:30 16:45 0 163 13 176 23 261 0 284 23 0 28 51 0 0 0 0 511 16:45 17:00 0 140 11 151 18 237 0 255 19 0 21 40 0 0 0 0 446 17:00 I Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: MARCEL DR SB: 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:30 0 305 8 313 25 160 0 185 6 0 16 22 0 0 0 0 520 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.92 PHF = 0.91 PHF = 0.69 PHF = 0.96 A.M. Peak 16:15 0 173 19 192 26 285 0 311 26 0 34 60 0 0 0 0 563 16:15 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.89 PHF = 0.89 1 PHF = 0.88 1 PHF = 0.90 P.M. Peak I Fi p" 0 0 U D Pi Intersection: E-W: TASKER RD Weather Dry File Name N-S: ROUTE 522 Count By JJP Input By JJP Location WINCHESTER,VA Count Date 5/12/2005 15 Minute EB: TASKER RD WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 8 0 70 78 0 0 0 0 11 68 0 79 0 90 6 96 253 7:00 7:15 5 0 79 84 0 0 0 0 14 67 0 81 0 98 8 106 271 7:15 7:30 11 0 83 94 0 0 0 0 17 82 0 99 0 107 8 115 309 7:30 7:45 8 0 67 75 0 0 0 0 15 89 0 104 0 121 11 132 311 7:45 8:00 7 0 66 73 0 0 0 0 17 90 0 107 0 117 13 130 310 8:00 8:15 9 0 59 68 0 0 0 0 21 101 0 122 0 123 13 136 326 8:15 8:30 12 0 47 59 0 0 0 0 15 112 0 127 0 126 17 143 329 8:30 8:45 7 0 42 49 0 0 0 0 16 122 0 138 1 0 127 14 141 328 8:45 A.M. Total F 67 0 513 580 0 0 0 0 126 731 0 857 1 0 909 90 999 2436 A.M. Total 16:00 14 0 28 42 0 0 0 0 49 138 0 187 0 114 17 131 360 16:00 16:15 17 0 30 47 0 0 0 0 51 147 0 198 0 111 15 126 371 16:15 16:30 16 0 36 52 0 0 0 0 64 161 0 225 0 119 19 138 415 16:30 16:45 17 0 30 47 0 0 0 0 70 157 0 227 0 137 22 159 433 16:45 17:00 18 0 37 55 0 0 0 0 77 164 0 241 0 142 31 173 469 17:00 17:15 14 0 40 54 0 0 0 0 69 148 0 217 0 136 22 158 429 17:15 17:30 12 0 36 48 0 0 0 0 63 160 0 223 0 129 19 148 419 17:30 17:45 9 0 31 40 0 0 0 0 50 152 0 202 0 123 15 138 380 17:45 P.M. Total 117 0 268 385 0 0 0 0 493 1227 0 1720 0 1011 160 1171 3276 11 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 32 0 299 331 0 0 0 0 57 306 0 363 0 416 33 449 1143 7:00 7:15 31 0 295 326 0 0 0 0 63 328 0 391 0 443 40 483 1200 7:15 7:30 35 0 275 310 0 0 0 0 70 362 0 432 0 468 45 513 1255 7:30 7:45 36 0 239 275 0 0 0 0 68 392 0 460 0 487 54 541 1276 7:45 8:00 35 0 214 249 0 0 0 0 69 425 0 494 0 493 57 550 1293 8:00 16:00 64 0 124 188 0 0 0 0 234 603 0 837 0 481 73 554 1579 16:00 16:15 68 0 133 201 0 0 0 0 262 629 0 891 0 509 87 596 1688 16:15 16:30 65 0 143 208 0 0 0 0 280 630 0 910 0 534 94 628 1746 16:30 16:45 61 0 143 204 0 0 0 0 279 629 0 908 0 544 94 638 1750 16:45 17:00 53 0 144 197 0 0 0 0 259 624 0 883 0 530 87 617 1697 17:00 1 Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: NB: ROUTE 522 SB: ROUTE 522 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Lefl Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 8:00 35 0 214 249 0 0 0 0 69 425 0 494 0 493 57 550 1293 8:00 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.85 PHF = PHF = 0.89 PHF = 0.96 0.98 A.M. Peak 16:45 61 0 143 204 0 0 0 0 279 629 0 908 0 544 94 638 1750 16:45 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.93 PHF = PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.92 0.93 P.M. Peak i'i p 0 0 p D p- 11 11 Intersection: E-W: TASKER RD N-S: I WHITE OAK RD Location JWINCHESTER,VA Weather Dry File Name Count By JJP Input By I JJP Count Date 11/10/2005 15 Minute EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 37 66 4 107 1 23 1 25 5 7 5 17 3 12 19 34 183 7:00 7:15 44 67 9 120 3 27 3 33 4 11 8 23 6 18 21 45 221 7:15 7:30 55 74 15 144 5 31 5 41 7 14 8 29 6 22 24 52 266 7:30 7:45 53 71 ]3 137 5 34 2 41 8 16 11 35 8 27 33 68 281 7:45 8:00 50 60 11 121 1 37 2 40 6 22 6 34 6 21 27 54 249 8:00 8:15 42 54 7 103 3 38 3 44 5 23 6 34 4 20 22 46 227 8:15 8:30 35 45 4 84 0 33 3 36 3 16 8 27 5 18 20 43 190 8:30 8:45 25 41 5 71 2 26 4 32 4 17 7 28 5 12 16 33 164 8:45 A.M.Total IF341 478 68 887 20 249 23 292 42 126 59 227 43 150 182 375 1781 A.M. Total I6:00 23 27 5 55 3 49 4 56 5 11 0 16 0 9 26 35 162 16:00 16:15 24 34 3 61 2 54 4 60 5 12 2 19 3 9 33 45 185 16:15 16:30 27 35 6 .68 5 60 9 74 7 9 2 18 2 14 35 51 211 16:30 16:45 29 37 6 72 6 61 8 75 9 14 1 24 4 17 39 60 231 16:45 17:00 27 35 8 70 2 58 4 64 5 13 4 22 4 14 36 54 210 17:00 17:15 21 31 5 57 5 49 6 60 6 15 2 23 2 12 33 47 187 17:15 17:30 19 27 6 52 5 44 11 60 3 12 1 16 4 13 26 43 171 17:30 17:45 20 21 5 46 3 46 7 56 3 9 0 12 1 8 23 32 146 17:45 P.M. Total IF 19 2247 44 481 31 421 53 505 43 95 12 150 20 96 251 367 1503 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 189 278 41 508 14 115 11 140 24 48 32 104 23 79 97 199 951 7:00 7:15 202 272 48 522 14 129 12 155 25 63 33 121 26 88 105 219 1017 7:15 7:30 200 259 46 505 14 140 12 166 26 75 31 132 24 90 106 220 1023 7:30 7:45 180 230 35 445 9 142 10 161 22 77 31 130 23 86 102 211 947 7:45 8:00 152 200 27 379 6 134 12 152 18 78 27 123 20 71 85 176 830 8:00 16:00 103 133 20 256 16 224 25 265 26 46 5 77 9 49 133 191 789 16:00 16:15 107 141 23 271 15 233 25 273 26 48 9 83 13 54 143 210 837 16:15 16:30 104 138 25 267 18 228 27 273 27 51 9 87 12 57 143 212 839 16:30 16:45 96 130 25 251 18 212 29 259 23 54 8 85 14 56 134 204 799 16:45 17:00 87 114 24 225 15 197 28 240 17 49 7 73 11 47 118 176 714 17:00 i 1 Hour EB: TASKER RD WB: TASKER RD NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 1 Hour ii Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 200 259 46 505 14 140 12 166 26 75 31 132 24 90 106 220 1023 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.88 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.94 PHF = 0.81 0.91 A.M. Peak I 16:30 104 138 25 267 18 228 27 273 27 51 9 87 12 57 143 212 839 16:30 ' P.M. Peak PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.91 PHF = 0.91 PHF = 0.88 0.91 P.M. Peak f Intersection: E-W: Macedonia church rd N-S: WHITE OAK RD Location IWFNCHESTER,VA Weather Dry File Name Count By I7P Input By 7IP Count Date 11/15/2005 15 Minute EB: Macedonia church rd WB: Macedonia church rd NB: WHITE- OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 3 1 3 7 3 0 0 3 1 49 2 52 0 37 0 37 99 7:00 7:15 4 0 2 6 4 0 0 4 1 54 3 58 0 42 0 42 110 7:15 7:30 6 0 5 11 4 1 1 6 0 55 7 62 0 44 1 45 124 7:30 7:45 5 1 4 10 5 0 0 5 1 58 5 64 1 46 0 47 126 7:45 8:00 4 2 2 8 6 1 1 8 2 53 7 62 0 48 1 49 127 8:00 8:15 3 1 4 8 3 2 0 5 3 46 4 53 1 42 0 43 109 8:15 8:30 6 0 3 9 4 1 1 6 1 38 6 45 0 34 0 34 94 8:30 8:45 4 1 1 6 3 0 0 3 0 34 3 37 0 29 0 29 1 75 8:45 A.M. Total 35 6 24 65 32 5 3 40 9 387 37 433 2 322 2 326 r —8 —64 A.M. Total 16:00 1 1 1 3 2 1 2 5 1 26 1 28 1 55 1 57 93 16:00 16:15 0 2 0 2 1 2 1 4 2 29 2 33 0 54 3 57 96 16:15 16:30 2 1 2 5 3 0 0 3 1 33 1 35 1 60 1 62 105 16:30 16:45 4 3 1 8 5 1 0 6 3 36 4 43 2 61 4 67 124 16:45 17:00 2 0 0 2 4 3 1 8 4 34 4 42 0 67 4 71 123 17:00 17:15 1 1 3 5 6 2 0 8 2 35 3 40 1 60 3 64 117 17:15 17:30 0 2 1 3 3 2 1 6 3 29 2 34 0 51 1 52 95 17:30 17:45 1 0 0 1 2 0 0 2 1 24 0 25 0 39 0 39 67 17:45 P.M. Total I 1 10 8 29 26 11 5 42 17 246 17 280 5 447 ] 7 469 820 P.M. Total I Hour EB: Macedonia church rd WB: Macedonia church rd NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 18 2 14 34 16 1 1 18 3 216 17 236 1 169 1 171 459 7:00 7:15 19 3 13 35 19 2 2 23 4 220 22 246 1 180 2 183 487 7:15 7:30 18 4 15 37 18 4 2 24 6 212 23 241 2 180 2 184 486 7:30 7:45 18 4 13 35 18 4 2 24 7 195 22 224 2 170 1 173 456 7:45 8:00 17 4 10 31 16 4 2 22 6 171 20 197 1 153 1 155 405 8:00 16:00 7 7 4 18 11 4 3 18 7 124 8 139 4 230 9 243 418 16:00 16:15 8 6 3 17 13 6 2 21 10 132 11 153 3 242 12 257 448 16:15 16:30 9 5 6 20 18 6 1 25 10 138 12 160 4 248 12 264 469 16:30 16:45 7 6 5 18 18 8 2 28 12 134 13 159 3 239 12 254 459 16:45 17:00 4 3 4 11 15 7 2 24 10 122 9 141 1 217 8 226 402 17:00 I I -lour EB: Macedonia church rd WB: Macedonia church rd NB: WHITE OAK RD SB: WHITE OAK RD 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:15 19 3 13 35 19 2 2 23 4 220 22 246 1 180 2 183 487 7:15 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.80 PHF = 0.72 PHF = 0.96 PHF = 0.93 0.96 A.M. Peak 16:30 9 5 6 20 18 6 1 25 10 138 12 160 4 248 12 264 469=16:3P.M. Peak PHF = 0.63 1 PHF = 0.78 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.93 0.95 I f'AEDERiCk Cak,.,tY, � Vh- a A) 49 vEP T. Gl%i �✓ G t/E3 �Rj V� �2 �o O I (/ a) GG S-SGS/ 7 asker II% odds Prv(% lolw�iad 2006 PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: R;Z. # al •o& : RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Perfouwtnce) 60.281 acres +/- and B2 (General BLIsilICSS) 18.897 acres -t-/- PROPERTY: 79.178 Acres t / Tax Map Parcels '/6-.A-48A, 76-A-49 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER: Allden, I.1.(-: APPLICANT: Allden, I-L.C. PROJECT NAMR: Taaker Woods ORIGINAL. DATE OP PROFFFAS: March 'IS, 2006 RC\lISION DATE(S): junc 12., 2006 july 5, 2006 July 21, 2006 August 11, 2006 August 16, 2006 August 18,2006- September 13,2006 September 19, 2006 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, sliall be iih strict conformance with the Billowing conditions, wWch shall supersede all other proffers dint may have been made prior hereto. In die event that the above referenced RP/B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are conluhl cat upon final rezoning of die Property Nvith "final rezoning" defined as dint rezoning which is in effect on die day following the last day upon which die Frederick Count}, Board of County Supervisors (tile "Board") decision granting the rezoning, may be contested in the appropriate court. If die Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a Final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the clay following which file decision has been affittned on appeal. The liendings of file proffers set forth below lhhave been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the tncatning or be taken as nn interpretation of nny provision of the proffers. T7le irnprovcnlents proffered herein shall be provided at the tune of development of dint portion of die Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless odte"vise specified hercuh. The teuhh "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its me u i ng all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Tasker Woods" dated January 15, 2006 revised August 16, 2006 (die "GDP"), and shall include the following: Page I Or 8 'I'ac6rr Il�avcb I , 1 A:ND USE,: ]Wfl'r X lakhvi'T 1 A R.esidenklil dnelopmont on the INTuoy shall not excited 319 units. T'he nnixtute. of single ("Imily dctacked and at.tachod L'tnits shall tw, desil;tintccl at the tine of Master Dnvclol.;rnenl 111;Ltt and shall nol. gcnorate mocr. than 2,,9 d average daily, my (AM). 1.2. "The, projcc( Shall be developed putsuant to stn ailntudizcd phaSiog; p1211. l;u Wh% pumot;; for no more: than 90 dwcllinr; unit:, Shall be issued within any cMandnr year, t 1.3 Co imetcial devcaopux:nt oil Ia;r. B2 zonal pollon of the Property shall not: exceed '1 /9,000 scluarc fect. 2. CONDY.I.'.IONS 1'TCL,CLll.I?1�l'.l"I'C) ".C.l al:c. ISSUANCE1 O.l` PERIv1ITS AND PLAN A'1'l?'.IZU��.t1LS: 2,'1 The I'ropctly shall be developed a;; one single and uuificd dcvcloptcu:ul in accordance with applicable urdiat;inccs teguladous, and design standards, this '11sker Woods Proffer Stalctnenl, aucl llt substanL'tal conformity with the GDP as approved by Ilse Board, 3, fil.11(1111 & 11J MU.L 3.1 The Applicant Shall contribute to tl.ie Boat([ the still of t;720.00 per single 1'anu1y, detached dwelling; unit for Lire and nscue purposes, payable apart Ric: issuance of a building; pern3it for each detached unit, 32 ',lie A.pplic;utt MR contribute to die Board Lie sung of $528-00 per sLLigle family, atl�ached dwelling; unit It fire and rescue purposes, payable upon be issuance of a builcing; permit: for each attached unit, T SCI-IOOI.S; 4,1 Tltc Applicant shall contribute to the Boal:cl the suns of $19,189.00 pet single family, detached dwelling unit for School pulposc:S, payable upon die issuance of a building pert k for each detached unit, 42 The Apokant shall contribute to the Board ffia suin of 5111,618.00 pet: single: fatiiily, al.tac.:hed dwelling unit for school purposes, payable upon the issuance of It buradatg pct:utit for r,ach att•achccl unit. 5. PMU(S & 0PP;N SI'.r1.M Al The Applkmit shall contribute to die Board the Suni, of $2 1.31T00 per Angle.. fau•tily, WON dwelling unit for rccrcaitotxal put:posos, payable upon the issuance of a bullcli.ug permit for each detached unit. .Page 2 of 8 � Ibrl el IVo�dr _ P�u(Ji.r.fYrll7 IN 5.2 Ile Applicant shall contribute to the. 13mrcl the sum of $113100 per single Wily, attached dwelling unit for rec.teatio.nsd purposes, payable upon the issrtancc of n building permit Fnt cash amclu,d unit. 5.3 Pilo): to .issuallco of the 100", ].milting pcu•tnit the Applicant: shill] cnnst.t:nct: a colSttllunity cmita, including a 2,400 syuatc; Coot pool and Full bllskNS11 court, in the location c1cpictcd nil the, GT)P, Other recreational itllprovc1l1C11ts shall include it nlin.11111.1111 of two tot: lotti lend ;t picnic: csllcltcr in the locations depicted oil the G1DP. Said il"RYWIClIle Ills shall count. towards Idle mcreational Unit recluircitlellt far Me p.Toposed developillellL 5A 'Phe Applicant shall coaStftict a toll Foot asphalt public hilcee-hilte:e ttatil .ill the locations depicted on tale C,DR Along du; •F'ropetty fl•oiltagc ou Titsieet Roatct and talc potion of h4mcdorua Church ]toad idcrntified as 11 ruajor collector said trail shall he Constt:uctCd is lieu of the adjaccalt sidC���a11C, Said inaptatYements shalt coutlt K>1t,ards the t:ec.ceal_iouat unit 1:CCIUlreir1elll tot the pt:oposecl development, C, UBRARIES: 6.1 The Applicant shall collttibut:e to the Board the SUM of $267.00 per single fatally, cetached dwelling unit for: library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a buildi.tag permit for: each detached unit. U The Applicant shall cmw hut.a to the 13oatd the suns of SM410 per single family, ataached dwelling unit for library purposes, payable upon the issuance of a building permit for each ;uaac red At. T PUBLIC SAP> ,n : 11 The Applicant shall mmu%1. W to the Bowl Me sum of $65[1,00 pet single faiuily, detached dwell'ulg unit for public snfety purposes tJim) .issutmce (if" bllilclhlg permit for each cictactle d unit, 7.2 'File Applicant; shall contrilmte io be lmad the suns of MUD per single family, attached dwellhig unit for public safoty purposes upoll issuance of it building peen-iit Lot each tttttaclicct unit. 8, GENET -AL GOVERNMENT: 'I'lle Applicant shall contribute to die Board the suns of $320.00 pet siligle ffamily, cletachecl clivellulg ulltt fol: gCnetal govel:nnleutal pUTposes upon issuance of a building permit for each detached unit, 8.2 Che Applicant shall cont•ibnte to the Bonn] the suill of $2115.00 per single fatality, attached cltvclling unit fol: gcnetal govertlmental purposes upon issuance of: a building permit For each attached unit. Parc 3 or '1•nrl.w If%nnrlt --- -- P�nQir,hrrnw�rid 9, CREATION 01" 1:-10N] ,(-)\1/hI1:31tS' A.NJ:) PROPERTY OW.Nl_",RS' .ASS0Gl'A.'T'l0N: 9,1 Tlu% reside:nlial dev(:lopthu,nY shall he: trade. subject: to a houu.owners' associaYicm (h udnafica' "I=i(• 01 tint shall he wgynsiblc fiat: tile; ownet'sltilt, n:rtitttenancc and tepair of all cotntnon s rm% including any consanYon nre;t;t that rusty Ix aaahiishud in accordance herewith not dedicaled to dw County or others, for each sn•ca subject to thcit jurisdiction, and shall be. provided such other t'csponsibilitic:s, duties, and powers as are customary for such associations of as .May he required for such 1-101\ herein. 92 In addition to such otbet: duties and reapondb]]itics as nuq, be assigned, an 1a0.A shall have title to and responsibility for. (i) all. common open space areas not odwrwhe dad.kawd to public: use, (]l) cou•;ntoit buffer "uteri located outside of residential lots; (iii) cotrunon solid wash: disluwal pwgmms by a couhmet:ci;tl collection company, (iv) responsibility for the perpetunl Ina intertalice, of stay sb.cet, peu.uhetet, or road buffet su'eas, all of which buffet areas shall be located widths c asenicnts to be gesuitecl to ffic 1401\. if platted witivn residential of other lots, of otherwisc l vantccl to the 1-I.OA by appropriate histniniont, (v) responsibility foe payment: for n-tstintenalice, of strc;etlights and (Ni) maintenance of liMP's and stot:mwatce comieyance channels, %2 IN Applicnnt shall establish a stntl:-up fund for: the: A`nsker \X/oodr; ]-1(-).A that will includr, all initial 11111.11) suthh payment of SI,50 A0 by the Applicant and an additional paynwnt of $'100.00 for each hlatte'd l(it within the TUC): \\/oods colt'tlrtunity of which f•hc assessment rot cuch Platted lot: is to be collected at. the Yitiv., of initial Iransfca: of tills and to hc directed to thc'1"nslrcr \\/odds TIGN fund, langustge will be incorporatccl into the.'T•aslcct Woods T-.TOA Declaration of Restrictive Covenatht Document and beer of Dedication chat cthstctes the uvnUnbiltty of these fhut.cls Prior to file transfer or ownership and maintenance responsibility ftotrt lltc Applicant to the. Taslcer Woods HOA. The start up funds for the'T'asket Woods 1-IOA shall be made availablc for the purpose of inauhtenance of all itnprovcsncuts will>ut rile colmilon open space areas, liability insmance, street light assessments, and property management and/or legal fees. 9U, AN/.A.':MR c`k SL\1/.R?R: I i '10.1 J"he 1\pplicant shall he tesponsiblc for connecting the Rvopetty to public watct and sewev, and for eoustt:ucO_ug all facilities rcqui.ecd .for such conne.dion. All water and sewer infinstructute shall be CollsUatcted ill nrrorcinncc with therequicctnents or the Frcdc.uklr County Snrtitation j Authot:ity and the .1 reder.ic.lr \X/incheslcr Sca7 irr..r'\nfhoiif.}, i PHge to Of 8 P, u�/i�r .1�1u1r. riicul 11, r,NVrizal\rl\rf:l�T'. '11.1 Storniwatct: management: and Tied: Managetnent Practices (131\111) for the :Propetay shall be provided in accordance AM the Virginia Stcumwnter h1suiagetmnt Regulations, ]:lhst Fi,d. 1999, Chapter 2, 'Yablr. 2-3 which ccsulls in the lughust ostler of stounwater control in existing V•iighh law at: the time of construction of any such facili.ly. '12. '1RANSl'OR'1P1'ION; 12..1 1.1111 16portaaon ilnpcovenlents shall he designed and consWided consistent With the study untitled "A lhfhc Impact Analysis of the '.l'aslcec \.\Woods," prepared by I'altull ]-lours Ralst Ik 1lssuchted, dated ltcbrunly 2, 2006 with addendum dated July 11, 2006 (lire "'1.' R ), Ito Applicant shall privately fund all tennspottatio.o i.n)l.ito`crenunts ro' luirad of (Ilis l7rojc ct. 12..2 [,Ile Applicant ,hall .install or bond a traffic siFaal at; the inl:etserlion of Route 522 and PAncedooia Church Road prior to .issuance of the 50" building ; permit unless othetwhe directed by ]iruhrick County and/or' TOT. 12.3 'The Applicant shall contribute to the Board the sum of $1000 per- single Wily, detached dwelling• and Swn per single family*, attached dwelling for tennspol:tation imptorements to the 90ker Road can idor upon the issuance of a huH&ng permit for each unit. 12,.rl 'The .Applicant: shall design TvIacedonia Church Toad is it folic ,lane roadway with landscaped mediasl front the cond's intcrt;oclion with \\/bite Osslc '.Road to (:Ile Intersection with front: Royal hike. The, Applicant :;hall cowartlCa' Macedonia Church Road lrolrt its inlersecdon with ]:!rout Royal Pike as it four lnuc roadway with it landscaped median for a nvnh'num distance of 200 feet prior to trallsit:ioluing to it there little scct:iDn that then transitions into n two lane section that aligns with the existing two lane section. of: improved W\`/1•dte Oak Road at Canter Estates. Said roadway sliall also include ft:n:n lanes its directed by VDO'1'. Said h'nprovertient shall be completed prior to issuance, or die 50" band ng permit, Iniproven-lenls to Macedonia Church Road shall also ioc:lude d,e constcurt'ion of an iron fuoe(i alont; it portion of the Runtstge of: A hincedonin Church peopett). and � consolidation of the current church entrances into a single access point as depicted on the GDP. The Applicant shall cicclicate right of way necessary to achieve an 80 foot: right of way to allow frill implementation of a major colleclot: roadway between existing NX[bitc. Oalc Road and Front. Royal Pike that will not: negatively in7pact site esislitig gt'at%epard at Nfacedonia Claicch.. (See 'l oil GDT') 12.5 Dixect. access to individual lots front the portion o1: Macedonia Church Road drsignnled as a majo.e ro.11ecior shall be prohibited. Page 5 or Tat/.:er II%nnrlr Prnfjrr,flul rnrnl 12.6 Accost; to cotlitw cc;inl potdoris of the Propotty shall I)c provided via the filttue roadway contlecting the, commeecial and .teskleadall portions of the propel" as Muted on die: C7h'h. Said connection between residential and comnu:ecial portions of, the l?ropett), shall be Inado ptiot to occupancy of filly builcling consttalctcd on the pottion of the Property zoned 132. Cointnundal entt:ances on Tasl(c:r .Road shall be prohfbited. 12.7 l.'he .tlpplicant shall enter inl:c-) a signali�al.ion figlecmenl; with I:hc 1'ritf;inia I Depu:1111ellt OFT,: insportation that is hinding for a period of Ova yams from the (late: of final rezoning approval with an option frn: an additional Five years foe the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of 1\bwd Drive and the ptuposcd falt_t'ance. on '1'asker Road. In addition, the Appli( shrill be respousihlc thcuugh said at;nwilenl, for the inslallat•ion of a Sunthhound left: t:ut:n lane on thr. proposed int.ernal collector .rand us wall a;; a wwal)ound right: t.ucn lane on 'Ihsker Road at the subject: irltc:tsection. If ol: whell, ill the. opio.ion of VDCl' 4 a ttllffie, signal an or to turn lands fire rccp&ml, the Applicant shall provkW funds including arty Accessary bond to constt:u(t 411provelnclats at said uitersecdoll. 12.8 '11ie Applicant shall dedicate 27 feel of right, of wit), tom the (:enter line of die portion of Nfacedortia Church Road not identified us fl major collecum: prior to issuance of the 50"' I)nRcling pel:ntit. 13, HISTORIC A9:t\1.titl t,11 13.1 The Applicant shall install a historic marker in collaboration with Macedonia Chtlrch that Motes the historical sapni-ficancc of i\..lacedonia Church, '14. COMMERCIAL DE'STGN S'.I.'.A.ND.A DS 14.1 All buildings whWn be cwl-l.rnercial area of the property shall be constructed using compatible al•ehitechlral style and materials. 'T'lie principal fn�acle in addition to any facade fi:onting'Faske.e Road of all cornnlercial builclings shall he limited to one or a co.tnbimtion of the following mat:ednls: cast stone, stone, I,)l:icic, glass, wood, swcco at other high duality, long, lasting masonry .materials. • 15. COI\04FROAL SiGNAGT, I 15.1 Froestanding aomtnercial signago along Taskor Road shill be, limited to a singlo monument stylo sip at die propo"wd infornal collootor road i mixorlce at Tasker Road. hrlawinntm height Rlr all signs located on the I Ihoperly shall ve: 20 W. I j 15.2 .Pylori sl.ylc signs shall bo prohibited on lire :Properly. rage 6 of 8 '1'nrker• II%uurli 1'ro(/tir.S'fnlur�ierN lG. STRM3T Tl EES' 1 & l The Apo Want shall locam street Cress Mong the mad Kntay;e of both m kvi! Road and thr: intcl-nal minor collecl.or marl w.il•hin the comn7cerial. hirrd bays of Ilse Prol,cr(:), to rnhsux,c the Visual chacetr.l:crisfics of both roi;ridr»a, Strict sla;cel: tren�� shall he pl;u�lc:d ;r tuaxin,utx� cif r1Q' ahai;t ;u,d alyall ho plautccl prior to occuparu:p of any building; conatruc;l:cd on the horrion Id tlu: zoucd 1Z7.. SIGNATURES A:fTI A'R. ON TTTl3 Pqc 7 of S \.\� CONSOLIDATE. ClIUItCII ENTIRANCES 1'[I SINGLE ACCESS ['I]INf RIP IRON FENCEan T�\ � ' c f u -:,,�:;.;•_'"!%:. �G�'�',� � )� i JIB ;'-����1����\. COMMUNITY CENTER `'� j '1 wqC ' UD��.��i-� `�l' & POCKET PARK y+• '•~��\ •�` �:. J , �� -toy-., t S-�; j ( 1 rf�arua~l TA iicu Sr1At ,cbsr CHED LN t t •! 1 y \vc,e •`,•.•, 1� `•/ � .©�` SF�1' Ti1C11E � � 1 , Ij \.1\��\ 1, • `•`��`%rr � � ` � :��` '�:.� 1 l / E. — M PROPOSED usEi .b161E�tC 1� i i // -�x � � , /(/ /�` ( •� � 7;4SKEle WUO1Z� l -- ll; \ Patton, Ilarris, Rust & Associates, pc GfA1f-RALLZFU 0f-W-L.UPMC:N1' PLAN 111 E. Picadilly St. Y6ncllacler, Virginia 22601 q R VOICE: (540) 6W-2139 FAX: (540) 665--0493 FREDERICK COUNTY, WRCIN14 27'WN/TE ONFf 77jEF-" --- Sz9'37"/G't FO. /fjON SET Y-''X /0'/P. F[ U9/7 W/r// GReUNO a WH/TF O.PX - -. 3/. 19' J /5ORBUT[ Fq -: 509'43 S2 E" - GZ G/ c "DEgO s 8Z 30' GO MO[aga' U7 J/6 SHY/[LE 3 5077Y OYW' G3 's• 2 COT - oy �s�_ /SET /4'X 3'/P 30.3T _ r�__ y�!�. / 3•...- //9 5"05N7L7E.? FL2 /gCW 170q. 572771,'R E' TBs9 /t3"5&' /3 / \,a� .,� 120.Do' v9/D'CELSH/f 7f�EE/N FQ (POND\'., - ' FR //jON ff00 ,r s- FENCEUNE /R aV weU." 5/AE OFA5593557E- Z80.06"LHNTZ T/jEE / '1 `T /fli •-.569'35"4B E 'JFjE /.V 4/L.ZZ' 7 - 30 "6L Af/f OA/j TfjEE -"' 44-02 T.9X. MHP PA/jCEC 76-A-49 _ - CUfjVE V-. 3 it e K 53. 02903 fiCfjES 7/ f NON fjAO/AL COf3VE SE�jMENY<2� FJ 183. 30' 4 = 04 55%ez- i 2, 309, 90/ '4 OEEO 900/1 46W F'f/GE FO A 15. 93' r - 7 97 ' , NA/L /N E CN= J5-fz• PVM'T CN. B = N 70'O6'4D'E -. N7G'S0'42 << 276.75' . SET R/! SPIlE /N c PYMT- - — l CUi�Vf�Ej No 2 E f -. .._ T 1741 ' -� EiZI 5EGHEN79L f Fj= Z7d. 5.3 G = 37'ZD'ZS VIROINLA: FREDERICKCOUNTY. SCT. Thl rXnant of writutt was produoad to nu Cn i the and with [ertif�to of a'cM1 v ki4ment tnarata annexed as adm4tad o n=ird Tax Imposed try Sec. 58-54.1 d 87 Pl. NH/L CAP CH / T9 33' � - L %0�0� nd 5854 nave been paidasaeasabM- =584-Z7'E f�4S N27'Sf'04-W _ POWE IAI CWCO.07_--- —•� `� /2Z 94' y ,//'� -s'f __�-I�. o7g4 A�-jam-~ r��— M1N55'//'34"W � a / CLERK poz E9Mi7,7/C 1 Ug VE No-/ Lf g0'W/OE N33'3909"W B5./5- --�_. L=•__-__:-------:-. _-- �.tO. stea A/0N FJ770//7Z CURVE BOUNOHFJY SUfjYE7� rv. n0. titt PC 63 SE¢MENT = 2988' PI j. NH/C 'G Jg o 1Z6.40 0 = 77'ZO 08' CN = 157 95, OF rh'E 560 PFjOPEfjT/E.S OF �r, vw Mo- at J 70. c/' ' r /o/I. /5' c/L e - N7s43'/s E �Osq. iyav Floo PAj71�/N5 M/L L Pfjoc/Ecr +n« TAX MHP PAfjCEC 76 -19-49 ° wa trut� s TU NE Y/C/jE/35 s. - 30 • /3/l7HT OF WAY R fi C� OEEO BOOK 466, Pf7QE /9/ o+, �pta (1r 4� ZO'PAYEMENT -t�JP.N23'45'/S'W /OG. 70' 5Q. /1WIV 1100 LOU/S ✓ MHTFiiC/fix C.L.B. Q, n •• Iffre '--Nzi•2/:57`W 7sR 7G' PO. BOX /76 94L/EMOA17 , V/, 220/2 OPECt7�ION MACO&AI V, OJSTFJ/CT o �� CS NJ t►� / (703) - 955- 445�4 FfJEUEfJ/Cfj COUNTY, V/fjy/N/f/ _ / 3T 54' IffON sf00 G'ABOYE G/70UNO, 5. E. S/LaE OF FENCE P05T FHLG S CNUFfCh' , Y/TjG/N/f7 Sc HL E = /'= 200' '©; 9 -.�' •N49 O8"4?'W /744' �/03 - 573 - O/35 MAFJC// 7, /990 �jT. %� - OENOTE5 %z / 5 QEV/SEO AUG. Z9, /990 aL� 7�Z SNE'EY J OF / TAX MBP PHRCEL VRV METE/j -Ile SET Fjff SP//jE /N >t -YM'T _ Is sns� r / rN<c r 2 Sl. r..6r �jen.• :•f � rzi i.v ai .L..• / Z 1. �°� %(� w. vw In cl r•sY; �f 9•••n O C� Lott W. . h7D i 'w! fA.✓7• r•.. :n 7....,Pai..c � v � � 4- wx aoall-E 2 y y 1DU9 1 IUTACIA.� . - J 49'O8'44"E /49. TB' � � 37 -- 52/"Z/'571E J3'7. 76 Z CFY\rICATE Rs a�U\itl p�Z `4��38 523'46'/5"6 /OV:.70' - 7m 00 wa a ..rw. �C T,4X MRP 7G -A - }9 F 2 L/Mp S� crosiuR .. ✓FiME5 W JUMPTON� s% MC/j/Lt9.V -V4"s �� iuc�mr caws 40 , --.. - 533•/2'231E 244.53' - --_ ro[� a•I�i - 544.4%3G E- //9./7' TAX M/il� 76-A-feA �' '�i; .M�,- .•_ v}s �,•.�� `� 533.391091E 65./.?' ✓RC4 Al. 4RNTZ A?24 A. 7seiv`` s1ti. -a1j4-, cr7. J35'//341E //3.a}' •s.+�. er a... 527.59'04 E /27. 94' i .nd e� 22 "' i.e;s.F \•hrt -_: 's+I ryZ,• 93 r �"y/C SGO f bf. riw/. •11: '..-.O�r / i i� _ 572.02'e4 e, 962. 06' r6•A 4T e _� -�,. �.a..e S,1 /r•n S?7-Z7'S7'W 29.43' 3'11 { - 9GC'2d'3/"B G94B' a 2.8273 Ae. /n Ms� \ O 2/ � .s•} 9 %P. •r.r Sl. / n RwJ °13. 440 :, j-, 7i.vaw..w � _. ....._...._,. - i�/\ :\ _ 6f,j..e Rif C•rnr. e0//.VOR/SV S!/fJYEY OF THE P.gOPENjTY OF PA/g!f//1/S M/C.L 0P,CQ4V0A/ MA—r-EW/AL O/3'TR/CT aa. 32a, ev. s6.s F/fEJE/f/C!$ COZIVrV, VZWIN/R SCALE r /"- ZOO' OECEMBEfj /2, /989 RcvisCv AuG. -aK- T x MqP PARCta_ 7G •A-0fB GOb/S J. MRTRC/R, C./-. S. 233. 74a9 Rc. ► OO. S7J Pa 74B •v" V-MONr. V.PC/,V/R 220/Z'0. 7G SNCET / _ _ 7' RCT AM2 9Ra.L C103 )-955•//00 it 0 i 0 040004069 W DEED THIS DEED, made and dated this 24t° day of February, 2004, by and between JENI COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, JASBO, INC., a Virginia corporation and FRED L. GLAIZE, III, and individual, collectively hereinafter referred to as the GRANTOR, and ALLDEN, LLC, 2800 Shirlington Road, Suite 803, Arlington, Virginia 22206, a Virginia limited liability company, hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE. WI'INESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) cash in hand paid, and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt of all of which is hereby a'' acknowl6dged, Grantor does hereby grant, bargain, convey and sell with GENERAL CT WARRANTY OF TITLE, unto the Grantee, the following described real estate, with appurtenances thereunto pertaining, to -wit; All of those certain lots or parcels of land, together with all improvements thereon and all rights, rights of way and appurtenances thereunto belonging, lying and being situate in Shawnee Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, containing in the aggregate 85.49 acres according to the tax records of Frederick County, Virginia (this being a conveyance in gross and not by the acre), and being more particularly described as follows: PARCEL ONE: All of that certain parcel of land containing 53.02803 acres, more or less, according to plat and survey of Lewis J. Matacia, C.L.S., dated March 7, 1990, and revised August 29, 1990, attached to the Deed record in Deed Book 750, at Page 394. Tax Map No.: 76-A-49 PARCEL TWO: All of that certain parcel of land containing 6.5195 acres, more or less, according to Plat of Consolidation and Boundary Line Adjustment of P. Duane Brown, C.L.S., dated August 2, 1990, and being the same as that described as Adjusted property of 0 0 0 James W. Sumption, in the Deed of Boundary Line Adjustment, dated September 5, 1990, and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 750, at Page 386. TOGETHER with an easement for drainage, utilities, ingress and egress on, under, over and along the northwestern corner of Original Tract No. 3 from the right of.way of U.S. Route 522 in a westerly direction 60 feet in widthto this Parcel, as reserved in the aloresaid Deed of Boundary Line Adjustment; an6 being a portion of the same property which was conveyed to Fred L. Glaize, III, JASBO, Inc, and Oakcrest Builders, Inc. by deed from James W, Sumption, et ux, dated September 6, 1990, and recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 750, at Page 394. Tax Map No.: 76-A-51 PARCEL THREE: All of that certain lot or parcel of land, containing 31,7283 acres, more particularly described by that certain plat of survey made by Louis J. Matacia, C.L.S., dated :December 12, ' 939, anc. revised August 21, :990, which plat is recorded in Deed Book 749, at Page 1437. Tax Map No.: 76-AA8A LESS AND EXCEPT from the above -3arcels that _portion conveyed to the Commonwealth of Virginia by Deed dated December 8, 1954 and recorded in Deed Book 235, at Page 469, and shown on the State Highway Plat recorded in State Highway Plat Book 1, at Page 241, and to the Commonwealth of Virginia my :Deed dated March 16, 1995 and recorded in Deed Book 839, at Page 254, and shown on State Highway Plats recorded in State Highway Book 9, at Pages 325 through 327. The foregoing lots or parcels of land are the same lands acquired by Fred L. Glaize, III, Jasbo, Inc. and Jeni Company by that certain Deed dated September.6, 1990, of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 750, at '?age 394, and by that certain ?Deed dated May 20, 4996, of record in tie aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 860, at Page 830 (Instrument No. 960004817). Reference is hereby made to the aforesaid instruments and the attachments and the references therein contained for a further and more particular description of fie property hereby conveyed. This conveyance is made subject to all duly recorded and enforceable restrictions, l easements, and rights of way. �J 0 cn The Grantor covenants that it has a right to convey said property to the Grantee; that it has done no act to encumber said property; that it will execute such 1:wtser assurances of title to said property as may be requisite; that it is seized in fee simple of the property conveyed; and that the Grantee shall have quiet -possession of said property, free from all encumbrances. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Jeni Company By, - e its: Fred L. Glaize, III 3 0 .1 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA AT LARGE -CITY/e0bMTYof jto-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of V_i L_ G k a %tjL , Cw- 2004, by Biffy 4m Tisingcr;�' for Jeni Company. notary Public f WNgommission expires !1\3"\0"1 f AT LARGE of. �z to -wit: • h foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tshi c f . q day of !�JC , 2004, by 6t&y\t_, f).. S V., -4 R , for JASBO, INC. Mybon=�ission expires_ ' Notary Public >114.1 OF i,\*T'4M'OV _XaKc , e.J _AT LARGE ' k f0rC90iU9 instrument was acknowledged before me this ;I Q, day of 2004, by Fred L. Glaize, III, - 16 Notary Public M ct)mmission expires -tkrjk� c) 1-k UTNLk. FR 11RIEZERICK COUNTy, SCr. Ile 'Ibis instntrncnt of writf-m produced t. me on and with cen;Gcatenfac Was admittedto record. T t lhcrfefo annexed h S". 58.1-802 of and 58.1-Bol have been paid, if assessable L 4 4 _1' . .,� 1z: -t. 'am, Januag 2006 Tasker Woods V. SURVEY PLAT & DE E D ViewDetail 0 0 Page 1 of 1 Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail Department# : RE2006 Ticket #: 4800001 Name: ALLDEN, LLC Name 2: Address: 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 FRQ:1 Sup#: 0 Map#: 76 A 48A Description: 29.13 ACRES ARLINGTON, VA 22206 Bill Date: 06/05/2006 Due Date: 06/05/2006 Land: $160,200 Improve: Use: Original Bill: $420.53 Payments: $420.53- Acres: 29.13 Penalty Paid: Int Paid: Discount: Amount Owed: Other•: Last Date• 05/15/2006, Total Owed: Penalty: Interest: Note that if payment has been received within the last 10 business days, any returned items may not be posted at this time. Please check the website again. Date Type Transaction # Amount Balance 6/5/2006 Charge 0 $420.53 $420.53 5/15/2006 Payment 12023 ($420.53) $0.00 1 Use the print key for your browser to print a copy of taxes paid for this year. New Search Previous https://www.co. fi ederick.va.us/applications/REPubliclnquiry/ViewDetail. aspx 7/7/2006 ViewDetail Page 1 of 1 Real Estate Public Inquiry Ticket Detail Department# : RE2006 Ticket #: 4810001 FRQ: 1 Sup#: 0 Name: ALLDEN, LLC Map#: 76 A 49 Name 2: Address: Description: 49.84 ACRES 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 ARLINGTON, VA 22206 Bill Date: 06/05/2006 Due Date: 06/05/2006 Land: $443,900 Improve: $17,500 Use: Original Bill: $1,211.18 Payments: $1,211.18- Acres: Penalty Paid: Int Paid: Discount: Amount Owed: Other: Last Date: Total Owed: Penalty: Interest: 49.84 05/15/2006 Note that if payment has been received -,vithin the last 10 business days. any returned items may not be posted at this time. Please check the website again. Date Type Transaction # Amount Balance 6/5/2006 Charge 0 $1,211.18 $1,211.18 5/15/2006 Payment 12024 ($1,211.18) $0.00 1 Use the print key for your browser to print a copy of taxes paid for this year. New Search Previous https://www. co. frederick.va.us/applications/REPubliclnquiryNiewD etail. aspx 7/7/2006 January 2006 0 is Tasker Woods TAX TICKET t Page 1 of 1 Susan Eddy From: Clay Athey [clay@npaalaw.com] Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 11:20 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Cc: 'Patrick Sowers' Subject: RE: Tasker Woods Rezoning Dear Susan I learned yesterday that we will have to readvertise Tasker Woods for the September Meeting of the Planning Commission. Since we have some additional time Patrick Sowers and I are going to address the issues raised in the Staff Report. I would like to meet with you next Wednesday or Friday to discuss the Staff Report and hopefully we will have addressed many of the issues therein. I am hoping that if we can address your concerns, we could impose upon you to draft a revised report reflecting the issues we have addressed. If you could advise of your available times during those days I will confirm an appointment to discuss the foregoing with you Thanks Clay From: Crystol Hiserman [mailto:crystol@npaalaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:52 AM To: clay@npaalaw.com Subject: FW: Tasker Woods Rezoning From: Susan Eddy [mailto:seddy@co.frederick.va.us] Sent: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 9:37 AM To: crystol@npaalaw.com Subject: Tasker Woods Rezoning Crystol, Deputy Planning Director Mike Ruddy spoke with Mr. Athey recently about the Tasker Woods rezoning. I was asked to email a copy of the staff report for the Planning Commission. Attached is that staff report. Regards, Susan Eddy Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Department 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 540-665-5651 8/17/2006 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: October 13, 2006 The amount of $50.00 was deposited in line item #3-010-013030-0007 for the company named below had a deposit for one sign for Rezoning 909-06 for Tasker Woods. The company has returned the sign and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: RSA/pd Morlyn LLC 20 B. Ricketts Dr. Winchester, VA 22601 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • • Finance Code 3-010-016160-0001 Description Sale of Planning Booklets Total Price �L40p(Do Treasurers Code (PC01) (lODL) 3-020-018'90-0000 Miscellaneous Reins (2009) 3-010-019110-0008 Sign Deposit PlanningIII (109s' 3-010-016160-0002 I Sale of Amendments III I (PCO2) 3-010-016160-0002 I Sale of County Code III I (PCO2) 34IM13030-0007 I Zoning Applications ? I qi Q-9 b . 5 1 I (Z-ASP) CHECKS: $ I �, 0,-3B . 5 t - ---- CURRENCY: 3C�G, o0 LESS CASH: PREVIOUS ENDING o� a TOTAL: 5 w;� BECEIPT(S) 90 r� � (CI Uay _ �Od 5) O:\Operations MannaIIDEPOSIT REPORT FINANCE-1VEVF'2003.N•pd September 1, 2005 W 9 —0� 5 Qi/ Page 2 e fee die ;es eve ,ev" .tract 1° On Saxes Sue pto4eny to 'ta��stt�ct net of the sy SSXO VNP. the Comttn Ada1reC asutet �n ack C°$o 17,5 p'L25 p0• vP21 ol t`ci`es`54o1665-56 � P+aa�essk va �s � maii c° fteactic �epts a aOrndoff@ & 0�1io j N.0 totmat�o CO.V �ov�s RO .'13 atcb ee am to 5 ttnl,,s, C ease b F c a y do pea , • • r---- - -- a ring P ea dta one ffet me , A01% 1 smaybe �Sin�Oca` •••••••Vr1 aid ,aea h°ut f°t aeta , . • . G1S�VtNa e tt�e, �`il� T A X • , . • • • here° � DERI CK COUNTY •,.••��lCE�a a(�g6 V%abe�`e�' WILLIAM ORNDOFF, . • • HICL temc� V4\ea2,es P.0 . BOX 2 2 5 R E C E I P T JR vE the Sta kn° / C\, �tOh, eo`otBJsttess WINCHESTER VA 22604-0225 `}sed 5o0/ i ZONING APPLICATIONS atare Sid° tiignat�te � Ticket #:00015670001 Date 7/25/2006 Register: CJO/CJ Trans. #: 27600 Dept # ZASP . • Acct# Previous $ 19298.51 Balance Principal Being Paid $ 19298.51 Penalty $ .00 Interest $ .00 Amount Paid $ 19298.51 *Balance Due $ .00 Cash 300.00 NING Check 19038 Pd by FRED CO DEPT PLAN7/2006 CKS BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PENALTY/INTEREST THRU THE MONTH -- • • Im D AN vv Y COMPREHENSIVE PLAN aS • 0 PCO1 CAPITAL DAPROVEMENT PLAN PCO1 ZONING INDEX MAP/ S, PCO1 MISC. LEGAL/LETTER SIZE COPIES/ PCO1 MISC. LEGAL/LETTER SIZE COPIES/ PCO1 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATES PCOI 3-010-016160-0001 / BOOKLETS & MAPS SUBTOTAL PCO1 3-010-016160-0009 / SALE OF GIS MAPPING (10DL 3-010-019110-0008 / SIGN DEPOSIT 1095 3-010-018990-0001 / MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Include Shipping & Handling, Postage, Etc. 2009 3-010-016160-0002 / ZONING ORDINANCE PCO2 3-010-016160-0002 / SALE OF AMENDMENTS PCO2 3-010-016160-0002 / SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PCO2 3-010-019110-0043 / NIERRIMANS CHASE (10 DP 3-010-019110-0048 / RED BUD RUN 10 ED- 3-010-019110-0042 / SOVEREIGN VILLAGE 10 DM) 3-010-019110-0046 / RED FOX RUN II 10 EB 3-010-019110-0045 / LYNNEHAVEN (10 D 3-010-019110-0050/CANTER ESTATES -SECTION 5 (10 ET) 3-010-019110-0051/IWIN LAKES OVERLOOK 10 E 3-010-019110-0054/VII,LAGE AT HARVEST RIDGE (10 E 3-010-019110-0052/STEEPLECHASE 10 E CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT / ZASP SUBDIVISION WAIVER / ZASP RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION / ZASP NON-RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION / (�, O°° ZASP RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN / ZASP MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN / bjok jop d f r3a.e(' -] �.3 / ZASP REZONING / 1 6% q -7° a ZASP APPEAUVARIANCE / ZASP NON-RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN 000. °y ZASP N/ S •fe p lein e ry r o `� y3 02 ti ZASP MAJOR RURAL SUBDMSION / ZASP RURAL PRESERVATION SUBDMSION / ZASP LOT CONSOLIDATION / ZASP BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT / ,3 °O ZASP ZONING CERTIFICATION LETTER / o� oO . csv ZASP ZONING DETERMINATION/VERIFICATION LETTER / ZASP COMPREHENSIVE PLAN POLICY AMENDMENTS / ZASP 3-010-013030-0007 APPLICATION - SUBTOTAL ZASP NOW CHECKS �t 66 CURRENCY. LESS CASH: TOTAL I PREVIOUS ENDING # 9 a: -a v()I , RECEIPT(S) #: � a 3 q o i - O L] U:\DEETER\COMMONIDEPOSTTR\DEPOSTT REPORT FOR PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT.XLS �% Mp°a EX�e�aea\10 v 0 �t FOR %4 , kb` ebp COCA CC1 t0 00/0 11 `,Sed 5 �u<e i DATE `1 �1 a�0 N0. 902a. No. 9027 tt . RECEIVED FROMC- . ADDRESS o`ZC?. C3. ° ~' a , O `14 `! C §`"f t �i L� v S CV FOR RENT♦ N FOR f� �Q V "O N N AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH . U�1 -CHECK U BALANCE 6 ORDER OW PAID • 51 • Patton Harris Rust & Asociates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. JUL 2 2��6 R+A 117 East Piccadilly Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 PH T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 To: Susan Eddy Organization/Company: Frederick County Planning From: Patrick Sowers Date: July 21, 2006 Project Name/Subject: Tasker Woods Rezoning Susan, Please find attached the following documents for the Tasker Woods rezoning application: - Revised proffer statement dated July 21, 2006. - Check in the amount of $10,747 for the rezoning application fee. - TIA addendum depicting impact of 179,000 square feet of retail commercial area. Feel free to give me a call should you have any questions. Thanks, Patrick FAI, July 5, 2006 Mr. Patrick Sowers Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods Dear Patrick: 0 1: C I'Y of I'E RICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 I have had the opportunity to review the second submittal of the draft rezoning application for Tasker Woods. This application seeks to rezone 76.97 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to the RP (Residential Performance) District and B2 (Business General) District. I had provided review comments on May 26 and very few of my comments were addressed. For clarification, I've included my comment headings below and have noted and underlined areas where my comments have been incorporated, and those where my comments have not been incorporated. 1. Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. OK 2. Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. • The residential portion should be interconnected, ideally laid out in a grid pattern; The cul-de-sacs in the north could be integrated into the grid system. • Neighborhood scale commercial uses are preferred over offices; Not incorporated. • A neighborhood park is shown on the land -use map in the center of the development; Partially incorporated. • Inter -connected trails and sidewalks; Incorporated. • Prohibit individual residential entrances on north end of Macedonia Church Road; Reword to reflect correct road names. • Prohibit commercial entrances on Tasker Road; Incorporated. • Limit commercial entrances on the new collector road; Not incorporated. • Save mature trees; Not incorporated. • Provide street trees; Not incorporated. • Landscape screening of parking areas; Not incorporated. • A coordinated, and limited, sign package for the commercial areas. Not incorporated. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods July 5, 2006 3. Eastern Road Plan. Reword proffer 12.4 to include details of major collector. 4. Entrance. Not incorporated. 5. Bike Trail. Show bike trail on Tasker Road. 6. Traffic Impact Analysis. Caps on residential units incorporated. The TIA must model 179,000 square feet of retail use. 7. - Traffic Impact Analysis. Not incorporated. 8. Traffic Impact Analysis. Not incorporated. 9. Traffic Impact Analysis. Not incorporated. 10. Traffic Impact Analysis. Not incorporated. 11. Proffer Statement —Land Use. Incorporated. 12. Proffer Statement — Land Use (1.2). Not incorporated. 13. Proffer Statement — Permits & Plan Approval. Not incorporated. 14. Proffer Statement — Parks & Open Space. Not incorporated. 15. Proffer Statement — HOA. Not incorporated. 16. Proffer Statement — Transportation. Not incorporated. 17. Proffer Statement — Transportation. Not incorporated. 18. Proffer Statement — GDP. Incorporated. 19. Proffer Statement — GDP. Partially incorporated. 20. Agency Comments. OK. 21. Maps. Outlines corrected. Street names still incorrect. 22. Adjacent Parcels. Not incorporated Page 3 Mr. Patrick Sowers RE: Proposed Rezoning of Tasker Woods July 5, 2006 23. Other. OK. 24. Fees. OK. All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, DLC� T. Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner SKE/bad cc: Allden, LLC, 2800 Shirlington Rd., Suite 803, Arlington, VA 22206 Frederick County, Virginia " l l 7 2006 REZONING APPLICATION MATERIALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF TASKER WOODS Shawnee Magisterial District January 2006 Prepared by. Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Piccadilly Street Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone:540-667-2139 Fax:540-665-0493 PH I2l� • Januan, 2006 0 Taskcr !food.% Table of Contents Application II. Impact Analysis III. Proposed Proffer Statement IV. Review Agency Comments V. Survey Plat and Deed VI. Tax Ticket 1 L 2 1 2006 Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE SE NITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCV3MVT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PI -EASE PROVIDE COhBD�?VTSAS TO WHAT YOU WOULD F- TO HAVE COMPLETED. DaT LtLS DATE & TIl1IE Candice Bernie Mark Susan Eric Mike Kevin John COMMENTS: "K eq c ► r e t VV� �c �^ o u dT- Q're ct s Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): `� ., • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING September 13, 2006 TO: TIIE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RC: REZONING APPLICATION 409-06 FOR TASKER WOODS On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, September 27, 2006, at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 09-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers, for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76- A-49. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co. frederick.va.us. Sincerely, J�- J`'`) T. 44-4 Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to cerffy that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Plarming and Development, F •ederick County, Virginia: 76 - A- - 84- 76 - A- - 48-A SAVILLE, HARRY E & PHYLISS J ALLDEN,LLC 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 2492 FRONT ROYAL PIKE ARLINGTON, VA 22206.3612 �� WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4822 Patton Harris Rust Associates, PC Attn: Charles Maddox 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200�Q�\' Winchester, VA 22601 76 -A- - 31-A MACEDONIA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 1941 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1846 76 -A- - 32- MACEDONIA METHODIST CHURCH CIO JAMES SUMPTION 1941 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1846 76 - A- - 85- REED, LANE M 76 - A- - 49-B DABAY, DAVID H DABAY, MINNIE MAE BUTLER 2540 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602 76 - A- - 49-C STROSNIDER, ROGER L & JOAN F 2606 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4824 76 - A- - 49-A LEHR, DAVID S & PAMELA B 2678 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4824 76 -A- - 51-C STROSNIDER, DONALD LESLIE 313 KNIGHT DR WHITE POST, VA 22663 2456 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4822 76 - A- - 49-D KASTAK, ISABELLE 2490 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4822 tnaAA X. AAA1 Susan K. Eddy, Senior Plam Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK I, - ' a Notary Public in and for the State and County afore id, do hereby cer i that Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner for the DeWtof Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated L`►� has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this My commission expires on day of m, a(90 v V I v `11 OTARY PUBLIC 76 - A- - 48- BRILL, BETTY BRILL, OLAND 10 1804 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1841 76 - A- - 47-B HEFLIN, WILLIAM J & LORETTA 113 TADPOLE LN WHITE POST, VA 22663 00000 76 -A- - 36- PALMER, RICHARD A & CATHERINE D 1789 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1844 76 - A- - 35- WILKINS, WAYNE E WILKINS, CONSTANCE G 1847 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1845 76 - A- - 34- WHITACRE, GARY E. 1861 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA. 22663.1845 76 -5- - 55- BORROR, GLENN M & HATTIE P 1873 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1845 76 -5- - 59- JEFFCOAT, SHIRLEY SITES 102 FANCY CT STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 76 -5- - 61- JACKSON, MILDRED JEAN 1897 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 76 - A- - 53- WRIGHTS RUN, I-P 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 ARLINGTON, VA 22206-3612 76 - A- - 53-0 HERITAGE PLACE, L C 141 MARCEL DR WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4844 76 - A- - 47-A HEFLIN, WILLIAM E 113 TADPOLE LN WHITE POST, VA 22663 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 76 62- STR . NO, MICHAEL D STRICKLAND, JANICE L 1903 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING August 23, 2006 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RC: REZONING APPLICATION #09-06 FOR TASKER WOODS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, September 6, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 909-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers, for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76- A-49. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certi y tha the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on )- from the Department of Planning and Development, VredeAck County, Virginia: 76 - A- - 84- 76 - A- - 48-A ALLDEN,LLC ,p/ 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 ARLINGTON, VA 22206-3612 O L Patton Harris Rust Associates, PC Attn: Charles Maddox H 7 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 76 -A- - 31-A MACEDONIA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 1941 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1846 76 - A- - 32- MACEDONIA METHODIST CHURCH CIO JAMES SUMPTION 1941 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1846 76 - A- - 85- REED, LANE M 2456 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4822 76 -A 49-D KASTAK, ISABELLE 2490 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4822 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDER SAVILLE, HARRY E & PHYLISS J 2492 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4822 76 - A- - 49-B DABAY, DAVID H DABAY, MINNIE MAE BUTLER 2540 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER,VA 22602 76 - A- - 49-C STROSNIDER, ROGER L & JOAN F 2606 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4824 76 - A- - 49-A LEHR, DAVID S & PAMELA B 2678 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER. VA 226024824 76 -A- - 51-C STROSNIDER, DONALD LESLIE 313 KNIGHT DR WHITE POST, VA 22663 1 &M�44 Susan K. Eddy, Senior Plann Frederick County Planning Dept. , a Notary Public in and for the State and Coun y afore id, do hereby ce4 that Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner for the Dep ent lanning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated M),� �p 6 , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the samelin my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this ag- A,�,( day of q �o6 My commission expires on 1&,-2 /. oZ 7 OTARY PUBLIC C) Uf7� A - B • BRILL, BETTY BRILL, GLAND 1804 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1841 76 - A- - 47-B HEFLIN, WILLIAM J & LORETTA 113 TADPOLE LN WHITE POST, VA 22663 00000 76 - A- - 36- PALMER, RICHARD A & CATHERINE D 1789 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1844 76 - A- - 35- WILKINS, WAYNE E WILKINS, CONSTANCE G 1847 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1845 76 - A- - 34- WHITACRE, GARY E. 1861 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA. 22663-1845 76 -5- - 55- BORROR, GLENN M & HATTIE P 1873 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1845 76 - 5- - 59- JEFFCOAT, SHIRLEY SITES 102 FANCY CT STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 76 - 5- - 61- JACKSON, MILDRED JEAN 1897 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 75 - A- - 53- WRIGHTS RUN, LP 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 ARLINGTON, VA 22206-3612 76 - A- - 53-D HERITAGE PLACE, L C 141 MARCEL DR WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4844 76 - A- - 47-A HEFLIN, WILLIAM E 113 TADPOLE LN WHITE POST, VA 22663 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester. VA 22602 76I ..62- STRAND, MICHAEL D STRICKLAND, JANICE L 1903 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663 J 7 - C��''I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 2 0 2006 0 Numar y 76 5- 61- JACKSON, MILDRED JEAN 1897 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 _=-_��_��•=•= i„ill�i�i�ii",i,i��i,i�l�i��i,1„i�i��1�f���i,i�,i,i�,i,�ii NSN COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING September 13, 2006 TO: TIIE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #09-06 FOR TASKER WOODS On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, September 27, 2006, at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 909-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers, for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76- A-49. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: ,,vww.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, -V�� T. 4,4 Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Ll 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING August 2, 2006 TO: THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #09-06 FOR TASKCR WOODS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, August 16, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #09-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 58.08 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.89 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 76.97 acres, with proffers, for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76- A-49. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, C��4�Ow-7 Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner S KE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 t is This is to certify that the attached correspondence from the Development, Frederick ounty, Virginia: 76 -A - 48-A ALLDEN,LLC 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 ARLINGTON, VA 22206 3612 Patton Harris Rust Associates. PC Attn: Charles Maddox 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 PPG l 76 -A- - 31-A MACEDONIA CEMETERY ASSOCIATION 1941 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663.1846 76 - A- - 32- MACEDONIA METHODIST CHURCH CIO JAMES SUMPTION 1941 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1846 76 - A- - 85- REED, LANE M 2456 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4822 76 - A- - 49-D KASTAK, ISABELLE 2490 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4822 J l ll ■ L va COUNTY OF FREDERICK was mailed to the following on Department of Planning and 76 - A- - 84- SAVILLE, HARRY E & PHYLISS J 2492 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-4822 76 - A- - 49-B DABAY, DAVID H DABAY, MINNIE MAE BUTLER 2540 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602 76 - A- - 49-C STROSNIDER, ROGER L & JOAN F 2606 FRONT ROYAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602.4824 76 - A- 49-A LEHR, DAVID i. & PAMELA B 2678 FRONT -' )YAL PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22.602-4824 76 - A- - 51-C STROSNIDER, DONALD LESLIE 313 KNIGHT DR WHITE POST, VA 22663 aku�� I T e"L�-4 Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. o , a Notary Public in and for the State and County afore id, do hereby cert' t at Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner for the DeWartet o Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same irr my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this My commission expires of 76 - A- - 48- . BRILL, BETTY BRILL, OLAND 1804 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1841 76 - A- - 47-B HEFLIN, WILLIAM J & LORETTA 113 TADPOLE LN WHITE POST, VA 22663 00000 76 - A- - 36- PALMER, RICHARD A & CATHERINE D 1789 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1844 76 - A- - 35- WILKINS, WAYr E WILKINS, CONS ONCE G 1847 MACEDON A CHURCH RD WHITE POST, V 4 22663.1845 76 - A- - 34- WHITACRE, GARY E. 1861 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA. 22663-1845 76 -5- - 55- BORROR, GLENN M & HATTIE P 1873 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663-1845 76 - 5- - 59- JEFFCOAT, SHIRLEY SITES 102 FANCY CT STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 76 - 5- - 61- JACKSON, MILDRED JEAN 1897 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 76 -5- - 62- STRICKLAND, MICHAEL D STRICKLAND, JANICE L 1903 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD WHITE POST, VA 22663 76 - A- - 53- WRIGHTS RUN, LP 2800 S SHIRLINGTON RD STE 803 ARLINGTON, VA 22206-3612 76 - A- - 53-D HERITAGE PLACE, L C 141 MARCEL DR WINCHESTER,VA 76 - A- - 47-A HEFLIN, WILLIAM E 113 TADPOLE LN WHITE POST, VA 22602.4844 22663 0 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 1 lam and Smudge Free Printing Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 51610 0 f Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike. Winchester, VA 22602 I inda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 www.averycom ® 1-800-GO-AVERY Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike. Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 Linda Shockley 1569 Front Royal Pike Winchester, VA 22602 U !a►VERYU 5161w e69ts @,xu3pv 9 A183/�`V.-OD-008-6 �� ems wege6 al zesmin CC1a3 /liv%� iJ�iJ.nr. 9 ,-pld j e6egD-3s g -,le -3&ejjnogj1,ue �!oisseadmi o�F,2— -h'- . --d q—O 6 lg,5/276 Tasker Woods Property Owner Designation 776 (within Y2 mile radius of property) TO:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING FROM: BEV - Planning Dept. Please print sets of lab by HANKS. Tax ID # Name Address Zoning Use 76-A-31A Macedonia Cemetery Assoc. 1941 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Religious 76-A-32 Macedonia Methodist Church 1941 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Religious 76-A-86 Geetge 2000 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-85 Lane M. Reed 2456 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49D Isabelle Kastak 2490 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-84 Harry E & Phyliss J. Saville 2492 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49B Minne Mae Butler 2584 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49C Roger L. & Joan F. Strosnider 2606 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49A David S. & Pamela B. Lehr 2678 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-51C C-"ate-Sn�s�iiu� 173 Armel Road, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-48 Betty.. � 1804 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-47B William & Loretta Heflin 113 Tadpole Lane, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-36 Richard & Catherine Palmer 1789 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-35 Wayne E. Wilkins 1847 Macedonia Church Road, White post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-34 Gary E. Whitacre 1861 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-5-55 Glen M. & Hattie P. Borrer 1873 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-5-59 P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential 76-5-61 P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA aResidcntial 76-5-62 P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential AAd ?a-A-4RE -7(-,- A- 5 t -7 G - A- 5 3 -7(o - - 53 D -76- -4giS `i,— k-47A 0 IT-2- --4-' . % fiS 9rIC vvoo,�)S Tasker Woods Property Owner Designation (within %Z mile radius of property) TO:BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING FROM:BEV - Planning Dept. Please print sets of labels by HANKS! Tax ID # Name Address Zonin Use 76-A-3IA Macedonia Cemetery Assoc. 1941 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Religious 76-A-32 (/ Macedonia Methodist Church 1941 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Religious 76-A-86 2000 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-85 Lane M. Reed 2456 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49D Isabelle Kastak 2490 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-84 . Harry E & Ph liss J. Saville 2492 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49B Minne Mae Butler 2584 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49C URoger L. & Joan F. Strosnider 2606 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-49A David S. & Pamela B. Lehr 2678 Front Royal Pike, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-51 C C ' 173 Armel Road, Winchester, VA 22602 RA Residential 76-A-48 Betty J. Tim-. 1804 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-47B William & Loretta Heflin 113 Tadpole Lane, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-36 Richard & Catherine Palmer 1789 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-35 Wayne E. Wilkins 1847 Macedonia Church Road, White post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-A-34 Gary E. Whitacre 1861 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-5-55 Glen M. & Hattie P. Boner 1873 Macedonia Church Road, White Post, VA 22663 RA Residential 76-5-59 P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential 76-5-61 P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential 76-5-62 P.O. Box 480, Stephens City, VA 22655 RA Residential AAd -7 G - A- 5 3 ,/ -7 Go -7 L/ — d\du-b`c. 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK • Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 76 - 5- - 61- JACKSON, MILDRED JEAN 1897 MACEDONIA CHURCH R22655 STEPHENS CITY, VA NIXIE 201 1 00 09/04/06 RETURN TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMDER • UNADLE TO FORWARD RC: 22601.500099 'r0017--1.1670--02-40 22601Z5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING August 2, 2006 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #09-06 FOR TASKER WOODS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, August 16, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 909-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 58.08 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.89 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 76.97 acres, with proffers, for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76- A-49. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 76 -5 - 61- JACKSON, MILDRED JEAN 1897 MACEDONIA CHURCH RD STEPHENS CITY, VA 22655 N TX:L!_ 201 1 00 08125/05 RETURN TO SENDER NO SUCH NUMME:R UNAE3LE 'TO FORWARD • DC: 22801500907 *3017--03083--23 -39 2_2_80_1_%5_0_39 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING August 23, 2006 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION 409-06 FOR TASKER WOODS On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, September 6, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 909-06 of Tasker Woods, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, to rezone 60.281 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District and 18.897 acres from RA District to B2 (General Business) District, totaling 79.178 acres, with proffers, for up to 319 residential units and for commercial use. The properties are located north of Tasker Road (Route 642) east and south of Macedonia Church Road (Route 756) and west of Front Royal Pike (Route 522) in the Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 76-A-48A and 76- A-49. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Plamling and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000