The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About049-89 Supreme Block - Stonewall District - Backfile (2)./ '40 r 1■ r SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The application is not complete if the followingr are not present: 1. Two sets of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan; VDOT C��`� �b <v City of Winchester (Uv' l J Co. San. Auth. (OK) Co. Hlth. Dept.(r i' ) Inspections Dept. (oK) D & Parks & Rec. Fire Marshall COK) d (o Airport Authority 2. 2 copies of the Site Plan application 3. 5 copies of the plan on a single sheet / 4. 1 reproducible copy of the plan (if required) 5. a 35mm. slide of the plan (if required) * One copy of the application and comment sheets, two copies of the plan and the marked plans from the review agencies should be enclosed in a package which will be forwarded to the County Engineer. TRACKING DATE /6 8 Application Received O �CIL `` 10 Z4 00� Site Plan forwarded to Consulting Engineer II/2-7 sReview/Invoice received from Engineer p �J('� °=„Fee Paid ( amount S-W. °- f ,nears Fee i �l9�b'y 00nc. @ '11n.'•/acre. Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required) t Final Site Plan submitted with review agency, Planning Commission, and staff comments addressed.. IL L RECEIPT N? 022839 AMOUNT DUE R, $ C:2)6� , g AMOUNT PAID $o�� 3 BALANCE DUE C. PAID BY CASH v Y cl CHECK / V El OTHER m FREDERICK COUNTY DEPT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT P.O. EOX 601 • 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 • (703) 665-5651 DATE RECEIVED FROM f ADDRESS THE SUM OF FOR ,I •�� , 4� DOLLARS $ L �� Br 4, 1" zut__, DAYTIMERSRE-ORDER 140 3221 — P—teA n USA .)'RECEIPT TO() 0227:-2 AMOUNT DUE AMOUNT PAID BALANCE DUE PAID BY CASH E CHECK OTHER FiNEDERICK COUNTY DEPT. OF PLAP:NING AND DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 601 • 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHLbTER, VIRGINIA 22601 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS THE SUM OF FOR DATE BY DOLLARS S DAY TIMERS RE ORDER No 3221 -- Punted i, USA RECEIPT �N'2 022421 . AMOUNT DUE $ t,-ao AMOUNT PAID $ . PD -- BALANCE DUE $ U �- PAID BY CASH CHECK OTHER FEL'ER'ICK COUNTY D"Pi'. C, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 601 • 9 COURT SQUARE WINCiESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 DATE RECEIVED FROM - ADDRESS i •C/ �� .mad J ( IN C/ a""'�. THE SUM OF �'�.___ _ ____ _ _ �� DOLLARS $ f �. il FOR _ %Q..i �.e� r�� yl In OU f V �D�J BY —�� t r RECEIPT N2 022408 AMOUNT DUE $ ' 54-u AMOUNT PAID BALANCE DUE PAID BY L CASH CHECK OTHER FREDERICK COUNTY DEPT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT P. O. BOX 601 • 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER. VIRGINIA 22601 DATE RECEIVED FROM w-/ -I / — 1 �.rc.�� oj:% ADDRESS THE SUM OF -E'+ �c�W�'" �j Vy DOLLARS S �( FOR .. _ _ _ _ - < ; G ! i -' BY !=I ! LI DAY TIMERS RE -ORDER No 3221 — P—wd in USA • G.W.CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC 200 N.CAMERON ST. PO BOX 2104 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 7 0 3 - 6 6 7 - 2 1 3 9 TO: Frederick County Planning Dept. Winchester, VA 22601 1 • -3q LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PRESENT DATE JOB NO. 1 1 /8/90 ATTENTION Evan Wyatt RE: giinrPmP Rlnr-k WE ARE SENDING YOU n ATTACHED F-] UNDER SEPARATE VIA ElHAND DELIVERED ❑ CHANGE ORDER SAMPLES SHOP DRAWINGS PRINTS ❑ PLANS COPY OF LETTER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SPECIFICATIONS ❑ OTHER COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 1 July 89 Lot 9 Stonewall Industrial Park - Site Plan ARE TRANSMITTED APPROVED/SUBMITTED ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED/AS NOTED FOR YOUR USE El RETURN/CORRECTIONS F1 AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW or COMMENT ❑ FOR BIDS DUE REMARKS COPY TO: ❑ RESUBMITFOR APPROVAL SUBMIT___ FOR DISTRIBUTION ❑ RETURNED_ CORRECTED PRINTS ❑ LOAN PRINT/RETURN El RETURN/WITH SIGNATURES SIGNED Tnm Dr;,-n REV. 2.0 i I nimin suprEME SUPREME ANNOUNCES THE PRODUCTION OF GROUNDFACE BLOCK Over the years we have been industry leaders in the manufacture of splitface units and, having just completed the Martinsburg Mall in Martinsburg, West Virginia, which contained 500,000 various colored splitface units, we continue to fill the role of leaders in the manufacture of splitface units throughout the block industry. The purpose of this letter is to announce that we are now the producers of GROUNDFACE Block. This operation permits us not only to grind the face of concrete block, but also to saw them in a variety of new sizes. There is no question that the Architects of America have discovered splitface units and GROUNDFACE Concrete Block and we are pleased to be able to meet the demands of the 1990's for these exciting new products. When your project calls for splitface units or GROUNDFACE Units, remember to specify "as manufactured by Supreme Concrete Block, Inc." Supreme Concrete Block, Inc. is the only concrete block manufacturing firm ever in industry history to have undertaken the complex engineering feat of constructing four totally new facilities. Our firm was founded in 1946 and our management team has shown its capacity to meet the challenges that have been placed before the construction industry during these past 50 years. By virtue of these accomplishments, we have long been recognized as serving a leadership role in the concrete block industry. The fourth and newest facility went into production on January 1, 1991. It was recently constructed in Winchester, Virginia, and is the only concrete block manufacturing facility in the country whose manufacturing process is totally controlled by computers. The innovations made in the new concrete block manufacturing equipment permit concrete block to be produced fine in texture, uniform in color and consistent in dimension. ours truly, Stamatios L. Tiches Sales Manager MLT:ckd suprEmE concrEtE block, inc. box 478, hagErstown. maryland 21740 (301) 739-6080 • G.W.CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 N.CAMERON ST. PO BOX 2104 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 703-667-2139 TO LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PRESENT DATE 2/9/90 JOB NO. I ATTENTION Evan Wyatt _I RE:.qiinroma Rlnrrk WE ARE SENDING YOU I ^ I ATTACHED a UNDER SEPARATE VIA ❑ HAND DELIVERED ❑ CHANGE ORDER SAMPLES SHOP DRAWINGS PRINTS x❑ PLANS COPY OF LETTER COPIESI DATE I DESCRIPTION 1 7/89 Lot 9, Stonewall Industrial Park x❑ ARE TRANSMITTED F1 APPROVED/SUBMITTED ❑ FOR APPROVAL ❑ APPROVED/AS NOTED X❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURN/CORRECTIONS ❑ AS REQUESTED ❑ FOR REVIEW or COMMENT ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19___ REMARKS THE FOLLOWING ITEMS SPECIFICATIONS ❑ OTHER RESUBMITFOR APPROVAL SUBMITFOR DISTRIBUTION RETURNED_ CORRECTED PRINTS LOAN PRINT/RETURN RETURN/WITH SIGNATURES COPY TO: , A' y%MI SIGNED Scot Marsh OK -L� 0- . l� z h NO X PCEC�CO_NIL �\ r, FEB — 9 FA 1 U REV. 2.0 (j (D V,-,e COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VI IA • DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTI Caller G41�i ue 40— Time Called l ,) Date Called 7Zia /9 1 Phone No. L,7 - 4COO / Time Requested A )A F' Date Requested ASA P Received By EVP, A . W �i Date of Inspection 7 /9 1 PERMIT HOLDER NAME 5L)ME Il ` -I RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME DIRECTIONS S►Jt--7. IAtI Tr.�n��t tTc� RL ��firC BUILDING NO. oti CUL.--T) PLUMBING NO. PERMIT FOR: Type of Inspection Residential Footers Setbacks: FR Slab Water Sewer Rough Plumbing Groundworks Other: Draintile Service Rough Electric Rough Mechanical Gas Piping/Test ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICTS Commercial ✓ ��5 rr _BK L R_ Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Framing Final Mechanical Final Site Plan Final Building Fire Marshall Final Plumbing Special/Complaint Time In: If) ZO Temperature 8S F Cut in No. Time Out: 1(D ;J Weather >ut_Jt"JV Results: Approved Comments: Rejected Signature Date 7 I ! 6 /9 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIP • DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTI jIA Caller AM oS M �J C-715 Time Called C4/1-z/qt� Date Called 4 / I Z /'i I Phone No. h �7- 4L.00 Time Requested] A-S& P Date Requested A -SA Received By BukL_b„JCT Z�JSP�-rTo+�S l �'o-oa_ AA Date of Inspection 44 IG S I PERMIT HOLDER NAME RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME _11,0,3 -DK%,j i—_- DIRECTIONS S,MIJE-W kLA- 1►1jDVS7M1 I", _ �0i'IZK BUILDING NO. ENDyt= Msnti\ IDQ C UL— X-13 C_ PLUMBING NO. ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICT ��►�EW R lrL PERMIT FOR: Type of Inspection i Residential Commercial Footers Setbacks: FR BK L R Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Water Service Framing Final Mechanical Sewer Rough Electric Final i Site Plan Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Fire Marshall Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Special/Complaint — Other: Time In: WIS Temperature %° F Cut in No. Time Out: II:w Weather S000V Results:(Approved a- Tc-mPo( Jwj ` •O • Rejected Comments: _ i �) . i �i _41 �s�� y ✓vim![ Signature Date M M D D �Y Y X X C F/I/I�I� I/ IU15 18 17 1 DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND R UE 4b COUNTY OF FREDERICIc� 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350: sr -1:1- oAt9 - 81 A DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME I TYPE OF INSPECT1pN M M D D Y Y H H M M H H M M LAST FIRST pG� �� t U ka[}�enrlvpgd 3LJ alarm sYsferri 4" MWI' cad door SL✓� new....., 6U f%x—V pemat 7U bias" 8U 9" WA �uusin�allaoon 12" uat leak B STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUITAPT $loll l 1 I �� I. / I 5 G y(�I If�/ ,C� / I✓ C I I I I I 1 I I I I I I L 1 I I I Lel" I 1 C _ OCCUPANT TELEPHONE A'z lo e I I �'I �I I I I I 1 I I I I I J- l0 1p D D D MANAGER/ REPRESENTATIVE BUSINESS TELEPHONE n L� I/yI�KILI/ IE IHIo,%I: I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I/ I�I.JI-LJ-CT�J` E BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE LJFV¢ ✓,7len 1 I I I I I I I I L�LMI� 1 I I I I I I l I I L I I I-t I I I-1 I I I I 13" us removal la L1 ust liquid spd F �� / FIXEDPROPERTV L I I I -CaC� U�L��/� !� f'NC%L.CC NUMBER OF STORIES / 15U annual wispecvm 16" Comoxaiir 7 CONSTRUCTION TYPE I U fee resistive 3 U olecteo nor-Comtwsnde 5 " protected ordina 7 U ry Protected wood home 9 U not tlassrhe0 17" vrolaacri 2 U heavy amber 4 untxotecled nonixxnWstibie 6 U unprotected ordmary B nprotecle0 U u wood 0 U undebrtrined IS" are lane in+pecaon 19U are Iane appro N 20" re-RspecLm FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT it RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD v y M M D D Y V I II I I II II I U U— u u— U u u U u u 21 U WIe. I INSPECTION GUIDELINE -CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING C t Swce Under Storrs Used fa Stange Purposes C 2 Broken Ce"ngs andor Walls — Exposed Lath on Ceilings andor Walls EXIT AND EGRESS 0 31 Inadequate Means of Egress 032 Second Means of Egress Not Readily Accessible 61 Unapproved a Detective Gas Connection 62 Damaged of Detenorated vent Poe on Gas Burning ApOkance (Unnatural Openings) O 3 Delandor Unapproved Incinerator andor Spark Arrestor Screen 0 33 Aisles andor Passageways Obstructed ❑ 34 Panic Hardware (Anb-Pane Latches and Bons) Required on Exit Doors i' 63 lint Hopis. Vent Faro ardb Duct Systems Need Cleaning C 64 Com utsbipes Being Stored Near Hot Water Healer 0 4 Cardboard Ceilings and or Wales 0 5 Foe Door Not Serviceable ❑ 35 Discharge From Exits, Outsde Baking. Etc 036 1xitway Blocked andor Obstructed ORDINARY HAZARDS ❑ 65 Poo Housek CofXfrtian C 6 Foe Door Bricked a wedged Open C 7 OI Soaked wood Floors 037 Exit Door Locked andor Barricaded C 38 Exit Not Property Designated or Marked C 66 Improper Strom C 67 Stoage of Floor Oils. Cleaning Compounds. Nam, Pora> Etc C 8 AtticAreas Open to the Outside Screen to Prevent Entry by Birds 0 9 Doors Requiring Sed Closng Devices Not So Equipped C 39 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative ❑ 40 laumnahng Directanal Signs D Ents Required . C U Storage of Excelsa. Straw. Sawdust. Burlap. Etc C 69 Metal Drip Pais Required. But Not Provided 010 Pron-totne—Should Be Razed ❑ 11. Open and Exposed Foundation Beneath BIX " ❑ 41 Exit Door Swaging Agansl Line of Exit Tavel C 70 Excessive Grease on Stove 042 Stairways Not Property Enclosed andor Equipped Will Non -Standard Doors 071 Cockbn Cover Oft 0 12 Post Max Occupancy Load ❑ 43 Stairways Not Property mumnaled ❑ 72 UnalpprovM lash Containers ELECTRICAL ❑ 44 Emergency Write lights G 13 Inegal and Or wife eg Wang 014 Inadequate Service aidxi Insufficient Cuclits Fl�►e fongurON IS fie Exnnguisners Reglared, But Not Provided SPECIAL HAZARDS O 73 Un emssa deny ry and Dlsa AccumWation of Boxes. Calrtru. Et. ❑ 15 Insufficient Receptacles 0 16 Detective. Deteriorated or Spaced Wang 046 Fie Extnglrahers Need Recharge grinspecton 047 Unapproved Type Fire Extinguishers Collapse —Maintain Ordery Arrangement ❑ 74 Sr" n llatar0ars Location. "No Smpkxrg" Sgrs Needed 017 Defective ands Broken Fixtures 018 Defective andor Broken Switches andb Sockets 048 fie Extinguishers Not Property Mounted 1•-6(' ❑ 49 Fie Extinguishers Not Readily Vrsible ❑ 75 Flammable lauds andor Gases Being Imprdperty Used andAlr Strad ❑ 76 Inadequate V nblabon in Hazardous LocatXn 019 Circuit Breakers By-Pa%ed or Blocked Open 050 Sladppe rose Defenaated; Not Racked Cl 77 Stage o1 Compressed GasCykrders Wow Proper Anchorage (Racks or ❑ 20 Oversue Fuses andor Circuit Breakers Set Too High 021 Pennies Behind Rug Type Fuses 022 Metal Strip C 51 foe Protection System 052 DefeCw Standpipe Nonies ❑ 53 Slindf)a System Drsconnecfed Cnansl O 78 Oxygen Cylinders Bearg Sidled andtf Used in Greasy at Oty Locators 079 Oxygm CyNders Barg Steed Near Aceylerre or Fuel Gas Cyarders of Fuse Holder Cut Exit ❑ 23 Fuses jumped or Bridged ❑ 54 Sprinkler Heads. Cut -Hers Or e Blocked Siamese 080 Oxdltng Materials Being Slowed With Ards. Sulpha. Etc 024 Open Junction Box and or Fuse Box 025 Fuse Panel Obstructed andor Inxttssible 30' 055 Inadequate Sprmkkr Head Clearance 08 Inches Rtpuiredl 056 Sormkten Valves Not Properly Identified Cl 81 Unapproved andor Hazardous Paint Spraying ❑ 82 lash Room Door Not Equipped Wdn Self Cksi g Devitt 026 Molors andor Fars Dirty of Oust Covered Unapproved O ?7 Unapproved Extension CadyDraq Cads C HEATING AND COOKING 083 Open Flame Heabrng in Hazardous location ❑ B4 Vxam at Time of inspection ❑ 28 Use of Outlet Plugs ❑ 57 Detective Haug Unrt—Furnace. Gas Boar. Stove. Heater. Etc 085 Locked at Tare of Inspection 029 Lamps. Fixtures. Equipment Etc . Not Property Eiciosed (Hazardous ❑ 58 Detective Cooking Um —Range. Hot Plate. Etc 059 Gas Meter Blocked andor Not Prutectd G A6 See Suppement Sneer Locations; Day) .030 Dead and Unused Wiig, ShoWd Be Rertpved a eking and O 60 Furnace Bailer Heating. Cocking ands Smokeppe aM vent Pipe 87 IN THE OPINION Of THE INSPECTOR. THERE WERE NO HUWROOUS Clearances, From Combustble Materuls. Not Standard CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS i The condfbons reported on Mva bran reflect the peemmis as observed CY tear InsPecbr. at Inn Mae of Irmpection. Any on -off or omffwvm regfkrdWV OR safety or 00rfdr0orta regarding Ire pyervienbon M unintentional and are not deemed the tauft of the 0"-y SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR RECEIVED BY COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGII1 DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS Caller _ �,y(c I l��c c k; Time Called J OU'i Date Called I I %J Phone No. Time Requested A!q Date Requested II 9 9i� Received By �� . ��_�� Date of Inspection li PERMIT HOLDER NAME RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME YSpty <' vt" \ S >Zr .��«� —1 ►.gnu Ro�K I DIRECTIONS ) n—r- I CN n n �7 V S,w 7rZ vim_ BUILDING NO. PLUMBING NO. ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. C DISTRICT -M N�Jn L._� - PERMIT FOR - Type of Inspection Residential Commercial Footers Setbacks: FR BK L R Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Water Service Framing Final Mechanical Sewer Rough Electric Final Site Plan Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Fire Marshall Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Special/Complaint Other: Time In: 10 ! 5 fL Temperature � `� r Cut in No. Time Out: in `r� 4, Weather 5L)0)�J Results: 'Approved F, Q Taxi P C . Rejected Comments: L Jo - Signature Date / 9U G. W. CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 North Cameron Street P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Virginia 22601 703-667-2139 Fax: 703-665-0493 November 6,1990 Mr. Evan Wyatt Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Supreme Block Dear Evan, Ricketts Construction Company tried to get a building permit for the office building on this site. A permit was not issued because the plan calls for a 30 x 50 building and they want a 30 x 60. We have revised the plan accordingly and request the revised site plan be approved. I have enclosed two copies of the revised sheet. The contractor was able to tie into the existing gravity sewer lateral, therefore, the Grinder Pump Station was not required. We have deleted reference to this station from the plans. Finally, Scot had talked to you about moving the fuel tank to the southside of the road. This plan reflects that change. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call. Regards, 4 konislowsky, P. . RM/clh cc: Charlie Hott, Supreme Block Amos Myers, Ricketts Construction 01 -V%, 0 G. W. CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 North Cameron Street P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Virginia 22601 703-667-2139 Fax: 703-665-0493 April 19, 1990 Mr. Paul Bernard Donohue & Associates 11240 Waples Mill Road, Suite 100 Fairfax, VA 22030 Re: Supreme Block Site Stonewall Industrial Park Dear Paul, Thank you for your comments concerning the impact of the Supreme Block Development on the 100 year flood plain of Red Bud Run. As you have suggested, we have analyzed two other sections of Red Bud, one above and one below the site. The three cross sections and the stream profile are included here. It is still our opinion that the fill proposed by the Developer in the flood plain will not adversely affect the watershed. Section B still represents the effect of the fill on the 100 year flood elevation at the site. Section C was cut just south of the site, and Section D just north. As you can see by the profile the backwater caused at Section C controls all flow below that point in both pre and post development. The elevation of the 100 year flood will not change at Section C. The upstream affect is also minimal. The post development 100 year flood elevation at Section B is below both the 100 year flood elevation Section D and the hydraulic grade line extended from that elevation. The HGL slope from this stretch of Red Bud Run is assumed to be the actual Red Bud Run grade. The effect of the fill will have little effect upstream of Section D. We are in full agreement with your comment concerning stabilization of the stream bank and have provided for EC-1 along the entire length of fill. .11 -«. In summary, we do not predict any significant impacts either up or downstream of the site. The effect of the fill will be to increase the 100 year flood elevation slightly in the site area. If you should have any questions please call. cc: Charlie Hott Evan Wyatt RAM/klf Regards, N on Mislowsky, P.E. April 5, 1990 Mr. Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Department of Planning and Development ENGINEERS 9 Court Square ARCHITECTS Winchester, VA 22601 SCIENTISTS Re: Supreme Block Site Plan Floodplain Revision 17555.038 (Ref. File 72106 5-0038) Dear Evan: We did receive a copy of this from Gilbert Clifford. I am therefore returning this for your files. The cover letter looked like the original and I was not sure you kept a copy of it. Si DQIOHUE ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB:mb Enclosure ■ 11240 Waples Mill Rand Fairfar, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Tele/iix 703.385.8319 V1 FA • • ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS April 12, 1990 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Department 9 Court Square, P.O. box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 AP 1619%.� - of Planning Re: Supreme Block, Flood Plain Modification Request 17555.038 Dear Evan, As requested, I have reviewed the flood plain modification for Supreme Block and offer the following: 1. In review of the calculations provided by Gilbert Clifford and Associates, the channel cross section is being reduced on the order of 20 percent. This decrease will result in raising the 100 year storm water surface elevation from approximately 714.28 feet to 715.19 feet, which is an increase of .9 feet at the location of the cross section. This increase is within the limits established by Section 13-1-1.1 of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. The study at hand evaluates one cross section where the proposed fill or constriction is to be located. The Redbud watershed is a key watershed within the County's growth area. The impact of this fill material within the flood way of Redbud Run would better be determined taking as a minimum an additional cross section up stream and one down stream from the proposed improvements for a minimum of 3 cross sections and running a HEC-2 model of the cross sections in relation to each other for the pre and post modification conditions. (For this study, the distance should be limited to no more than 300 feet between cross sections). This will establish a balancing of the water surface profile for a more accurate impact analysis. This is important in better determining the impact on the up stream property. ■ 11240 Wlples Mill Ruud Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Teh, 703.385.8319 3. The fill slope will need to be protected against erosion during construction and slope stabilization. Rip -Rap or other appropriate channel liners such as gabions are recommended to protect the toe of slope while a suitable vegetation can get started on the embankment. The flow velocities, as indicated by the Design Engineer, are within the limits of a grass lined channel as specified in the Virainia Erosion and Sedimentation Control Hand - Book. PX90r ENGINEERS 4. Section 13.4.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires ARCHITECTS that approval be obtained from the State Water SCIENTISTS Control Board prior to filling in or altering any flood plain. At this time, the responsibility for Flood Plain Managdment has been taken over by the Division of Soil and Water Conservation of the Department of Conservation and Recreation. They do not review individual cases but can be available as local support for larger impacts. In the event that this application has significant impacts to up stream properties, as should be determined in item 2 above, then the Flood Insurance Administration will need to be made aware of these changes to the flood plain. This application is subject to local discretion. I feel that the above items must be addressed before I can recommend approval of this application. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB/jla cc: Ron Mislowsky, P.E. - Gilbert Clifford & Assoc. file: fredco3.17555.038 Dojo p iLA l ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS 11240 Waples Mill Road Suite 100 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Supreme Block Flood Plain Modificartion Date: April 12, 1990 Please Reference: Project No. 17555.038 Invoice No. 9002905 Client No. 07534 Principal .5 hrs @ 48.00 24.00 Project Manager 2.0 hrs @ 33.25 66.50 Senior Engineer 3.0 hrs @ 33.25 99.75 Admin. Assist. .5 hrs @ 14.50 7.25 Total Direct 197.50 Total Indirect 296.25 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE $493.75 _mil%L 4t! P„ �l< , C. e o • D L��_. ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS May 17, 1990 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning 9 Court Square, P.O. Box Winchester, Va. 22601 Re: Supreme Block 17555.038 Dear Evan, Response forwarded to Associates. I in addition I Wayne Miller. plan is unde place. The measures appear very functional. Department 601 to our comments our office by G have reviewed the made a site visit The development of rway with erosion installed The data presented impact of proposed fill apparent that the upstr impacts to the floodplai through the fill area elevation increase which section 13-1-1.1 of t important to note that spread the water surface onto the Grimm property area. One of the reasons response to concerns Miller for drainage property. Permission improvements on his prop M 2 31990 of April 12th were filbert Clifford and information sent and to the project with the original approved control measures in - are well placed and h is adequate to evaluate the within the floodplain. It is eam impacts are minimal. The n at the cross section taken is less that a one foot is indicated as acceptable in e Zoning Ordinance. It is this rise in elevation will an additional 50 to 70 feet directly across from the fill I made the site visit wad in T. Grimm expressed to Wayne problems elsewhere on his for grading or channel erty should be considered. This proposal meets the requirements of the ordinance regazding the floodplain modification limits, and the erosion control practices being applied on this site are as good or better than any I ■ 11240 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, Kiginia 22030 703.385.3566 Telefax 703.385.8319 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS have seen within the County. These positive points as well as the negative concern listed above need to be considered in the County's decision for approval of this floodplain modification. It does not appear that there will be any impact on physical improvements such as buildings or roads currently existing on the Grimm Property. If you have any questions, please give me a call. Sincerely, DO HUE ND ASSOCI E Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB/jla cc: Ron Mislowski - Gilbert Clifford file:fredco3.17555-2.038 [1t0J.JLl��AtLI ENGINEERS - ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS 0 11240 Waples Mill Road Suite 100 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Supreme Block Plan Review CG ► `�L_ C_ Date: May 17, 1990 Please Reference: Project No. 17555.038 Invoice No. 9004115 Client No. 07534 Principal .5 hrs @ 48.00 24.00 Project Manager 1.5 hrs @ 33.25 49.88 Admin. Assist. .5 hrs @ 14.50 7.25 Total Direct 81.13 Total Indirect 121.70 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE $ 202.83 0 G. W. CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 200 North Cameron Street P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Virginia 22601 703-667-2139 Fax #: 703-665-0493 March 30, 1990 Mr. Evan Wyatt Frederick County Planning Dept. 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Supreme Block Site Plan Dear Evan, During the initial review and approval of this project, a comment was made by the County's Engineering Consultant that the proposed grading would affect the 100 year flood. After meeting with you, we revised the grading to limit any impact on Red Bud Run. The plan was approved. Supreme Block has requested that we revise the plans to increase the fill in the flood plain, and perform an engineering analysis of this section of Red Bud Run to determine the pre and post development flood elevations. We have completed both of these items. The documentation for the flood study is enclosed. As construction of the project is ongoing, we asked for as quick a review as possible. I know how busy you are, but any help here would be appreciated. I have sent copies of the enclosures to Mr. Paul Bernard of Donohue and Associates. If anyone has any questions please do not hesitate to call. Regards, 6on Mislowsky, P.E. cc: Mr. Paul Bernard, P.E., Donohue & Assoc. Mr. Charlie Hott, Supreme Block RAM/klf LJ 'redev 100 year Q = 1500.00 cfs SECTION "B-B" W(1) w(2) A 0.25 0.00 7.00 B 1.00 7.00 150.00 C 1.00 150.00 312.00 D 1.00 312.00 386.00 E 1.00 386.00 460.00 • SUPREME BLOCK 100 YEAR FLOOD ANALYSIS RED BUD RUN vert diff length 4.00 590 A(sqft) H.R.(ft) v(fps) 1 0.12 0.77 79 0.53 2.01 310 0.99 3.06 659 1.71 4.38 1082 2.35 5.43 >stdev 100 year Q = 1500.00 cfs SECTION "B-B" W(1) w(2) A 0.25 0.00 18.00 B 1.00 18.00 72.00 C 1.00 72.00 122.00 D 1.00 122.00 184.00 E 1.00 184.00 265.00 F 1.00 265.00 365.00 I/ vert diff length 4.00 590 A(sqft) H.R.(ft) v(fps) 2 0.12 0.77 47 0.66 2.32 144 1.18 3.43 297 1.62 4.22 522 1.97 4.82 837 2.29 5.33 n slope 0.04 0.0068 WATER Q(cfs) 711.75 0.67 712.00 159.26 713.00 948.62 714.00 2889.83 715.00 5872.70 716.00 FLOOD HEIGHT = n slope 0.04 0.0068 WATER Q(cfs) 711.75 1.72 712.00 109.40 713.00 494.60 714.00 1255.08 715.00 2513.68 716.00 4461.82 717.00 FLOOD HEIGHT = THE PROPOSED GRADING WILL INCREASE THE 100 YEAR FLOOD ELV .91 FEET THE INCRESE IS LESS THAN 1 FT; O.K. Q(100) 1500.00 Elv. ri[ 2.53 Q(100) 1500 Elv. 715.19 3.44 • 0 Redbud Run Flood Study 100 Year Flood at the Stonewall Industrial Park Supreme Block Site Mar-90 Redbud Run Drainage Area Data Drainage Area = 2.48 sq.mi. Length = 2.46 mL Slope = 93.90 f t / m i Slope = 63.41 ft/mi Impervious = 8 % n= 0.04 Anderson Method Hi Elv = 948 LoEly=717 ADJUSTED(10-85%) Q = R * 230 * K-(AA.82) * (TA-.48) R = Factor = 5.4 K = Impery Coef =1.12 A = Area(sgmi) T = 4.64 * (1/sgrt(s))A.42 T = 2.83 1777.09 cfs Snyder Method = T(c) = C(t) * L' ^ .6 L' _ (10 L n)/sgrt(S) S = ((Hi Elv - Lo Elv)/2)/(U2) S = 93.90 L' = 1.02 T(c) = 1.72 From VDOT Charts Rainfall = 4.1 % Dir Rainfall = 42 % Adj. Rainfall 49 Runoff = 2.01 I(r) = Runoff/T(c) I(r) = 1.17 Q(100) = 500 * A * I(r) Q(100) = 1451.97 C(t)= 1.7 • • USGS Method Q = 269 * (A ^ .73) " (S ^ .21) Q = 1355.08 From Previous Study Data 100 Year Flood to Rte 37 = 1700 Additional Drainage Area = 275 From Rational Formula Q= C'i*A T(c) = 15 i = 6.6 c = 0.4 Q(100) = 726 Revised Q(100)= 974 Rational Method Q= Ci * i * A T(c) = 60 i = 2.8 c = 0.4 Q(100) = 1777.66 cfs Acres mi in/hr. cfs cfs Subtract Additional Drainage Area SUMMARY 100 Year Flood mi in/hr. cfs Anderson = 1777.09 cfs Snyder = 1451.97 c f s USGS= 1355.08 cfs Augmented Previous Data = 974.00 cfs Rational = 1777.66 cfs Strict Average = 1467.16 cfs Average(minus hi, lo) = 1528.05 cfs Use 1500 CFS v ti r� \� 4�ii Now = S-WP,cGf—= OF MAi�P(ALS o2 6- p,�,V,;1 0�j sTV-,1= SV1Qt�( i-7 K12G.L poor F-Ff.CT Ae r-LL:;�C N.I P/� Tie s n L S OF e D- u1\ t-uAJ. (oo Ex loo yi-*_� .. --- �LooD ��V �"" 1 ✓ ti V S 1c�e i C�11Nnc T.��eT = I11.7- -- -"� Tr%1 S SF+GnOT� OG CQASS 56�770�J r...s-�2PP�nEp Fe,?y�, �f S 6S GZW D �-- v C, - COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/667-0370 December 19, 1989 G.W. Clifford & Associates Attn: Tom Price. P.O. Box 2104 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Tom: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #049-89 of Supreme Block on December 19, 1989. This site plan calls for the development of a 15,000 square foot industrial building, a deisel storage tank, and fire hydrant improvements at the end of Tyson Drive in'Stonewall Industrial Park.- Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter, please contact me. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner I EAW cc: Mr.. Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia 22601 0 Supreme Block SITE PLAN APPLICATION County of Frederick, Virginia Stonewall Magisterial District Prepared for Supreme Block P.O. Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-4600 0 October 1989 by gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc. FREDERICKSBURG - WINCHESTER 0 �� `i' - 6 l989 � 0 0 11 Application for a Site Plan Complete the following application: Development's Name: SUPREME BLOCK Location of Property: North of Winchester in Stonewall Ind. (by street names) Park DATE: 2 October 1989 Application #: Property Owner's Name: Supreme Block Address: P.O. Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 Telephone: (703) 667-4600 Applicant/Agent: Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates,Inc. Address: 20 S. Cameron St Winchester, Va Telephone: (703) 667-2139 Designer/Design Co.: same Address: Telephone: Contact: Tom Price Total Area of Property: 10 Acres Tax Map Number: Parcel Number: Double Circle A - Parcel 12-A Property Zoning and Present Use: M-1 (Vacant) Adjoining Property Zoning and Present Use: M-1 (Vacant & Agricultural) Proposed Uses: Industrial Magisterial District: C COUNTY of FREDERICK Departments of Planning and Building 703/665-5650 LAND DISTURBING PERMIT For land disturbing activity at I_u'i i J•r61-JEVJAL-L- TN��S ; 21 fit_ ii4fZF� ISSUED TO: 5Uf'(CEM who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. Approving Signature Fu' U� Date: Io / NOTICE OF RIGHT TO INSPECT An agent of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the approved plan. Signature of Applicant Date: C;.f''� NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of the site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 C 0 AGREEMENT 0 THIS AGREEMENT, made this ZL-' day of by and between SUe(?eNG SLvu< ( R. ( I party (parties) of the first part; and the COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA, party of the second part; WHEREAS, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land deist rbance plan and permit known as 5 pr�vlE ,,6cy' 9 .C,-�' u�S I Trand the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction & before final occupancy, the party (parties) of the first part, his or its heirs and assigns agree to do the following work. 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented durinq all phases of clearing, grading, and construction, all conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per site plan # 00--8 In testimony whereof, the its corporate names and s behalf, by P. cy t is duly attested by ,ew,i- party of the first part has hereunto caused eals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its it ► _, and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. CORPOATION BY `% R; Z//isf- (SEAL) Attest: STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that whose names are signed to the f_oregoinq agreement, this day personally appeared before me in my State and County aforesaid and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this day of oe-A'Lel, NOTARY PUBLIC , 19'&`j. My Commission Expires �2? /` '7 S Agreement Page 2 In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by W,yjwne<tos , its Planning Director, duly attested by its Deputy Planning Director and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf by its said Director and Deputy Director. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE AND SEAL: COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA BY PLANNING DIRECTOR Frederick County Department of Planning and Development (SEAL) Attest: STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State afid County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day pe s na ly,app ared before me in my said County, �.�(� �(� Planning Director of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development and Q� , Deputy Director of the Frederick County Dep nt +of P anninq and Development, whose names are signed to the for Ding .and h reunto annexed agreement dated and each then and there personally and severally acknowledged the said agreement for and on behalf of the said County of Frederick, Virginia, and acknowledged that the seal thereto affixed is the true and genuine seal of the County of Frederick, Virginia. Given under my hand this ��jvy day of My commission expires 7, a--=tz day of cis „ b NOTARY VUBLIC 0 0 APPLICATION FEES Rezoning Subdivision Master Development Plan Site Plan Soil Erosion & Sedimentation Control Plan (not part of site or subd. plan - land disturbance permit) Conditional Use Permit Variance $350.00 + 25.00/acre + engin. costs 250.00 + 35.00/lot + engin. costs 700.00 + 25.00/acre + engin. costs 300.00 + 10.00/acre + engin. costs 25.00 + 1.00/acre + engin. costs 75.00 45.00 **We use a consultant engineer to review plans, who bills us for each plan. We will charge the applicant for the specific cost of engineering review. Structures used for fire & rescue services are exempt from the above fees. r COMMONWEALTH ®f V1RQjINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 September 28, 1989 Mr. Ron Mislowsky C/O G. W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. 20 South Cameron Street Post Office Box 2104 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Ron: WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance Supreme Block Stonewall Industrial Park Tyson Drive Frederick County This is to acknowledge receipt of your site plans dated September 25, 1989 to the above referenced development. The plans appear satisfactory and are approved. Please advise the developer if this section of Tyson Drive is to be eligible for acceptance into the State's Secondary Road System, then all entrance design and drainage features must be built in accordance with these approved plans. Should you have any questions concerning the above, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer 6�42 19- Z�L/0&-4� By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf Attach. xc: Mr. R. L. Moore Mr. J. C. Heatwole - Attached for your files is a copy of the revised site plan. Mr. F. E. Wymer Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. Thomas Gilpin TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY s a �a �4ht T� COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703 ) 984-4133 September 15, 1989 Mr. Ron Mislowsky C/0 G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. P. 0. Box 2104 20 South Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Ron: � 391 1 8 M D WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ref.: Proposed Commercial Entrance Supreme Block Stonewall Industrial Park Tyson Drive Frederick County Upon review of the above referenced site plans dated August 30, 1989, please find our recommendations on the attached plans marked in red and as follows: 1. The entrance typical section is to be revised to show 44' from face of curb to face of curb in lieu of 40' and 8" of 21-A Aggregate in lieu of 6" of 21-A Aggregate. 2. A drainage easement will be required at the outlet end of the proposed 134' x 15" RCP. 3. The entrance curb and gutter is to be adjusted as noted so not to encroach in front of Lot #10. Please revise and resubmit four (4) copies for final approval. Should any changes be deemed necessary, please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to call. RBC/sl attach. xc: Mr. Robert L. Moore Mr. K. B. Downs Mr. J. C. Heatwole Mr. R. W. Watkins Sincerely, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Senior TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY �S'SJ 0 9 • • REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Virginia Department of Transportation ATTN: William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278, Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (703) 984-4133 The local office of the Transportation Department is located atl 1550 Commerce Street, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P.O. Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-4600 Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC, P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 Attn•Tom Price Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPREME BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval Location: North of Winchester in Stonewall Industrial Park (Lot 9) Transportation Department Comments: See attached letter from W. H. Bushman to G. W. Clifford & Associates dated September 28, 1989. VDOT Signature and Date: 79` . 04f 1 (NOTICE TO VDOT - PLEASE RETURN HI FORM TO THE AGENT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attache THREE copies of your plans and/or application form. 8 Z3 -& z- / 8 9 lip ii jj, OCT - 619gg U''UL_______ '' J I � o 9 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER ( 703 ) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER September 28, 1989 Mr. Ron Mislowsky Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance C/O G. W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. Supreme Block 20 South Cameron Street Stonewall Industrial Park Post Office Box 2104 Tyson Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Frederick County 0 0 Dear Ron: This is to acknowledge receipt of your site plans dated September 25, 1989 to the above referenced development. The plans appear satisfactory and are approved. Please advise the developer if this section of Tyson Drive is to be eligible for acceptance into the State's Secondary Road System, then all entrance design and drainage features must be built in accordance with these approved plans. Should you have any questions concerning the above, do not hesitate to call. RBC/rf Attach. xc: Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Mr. Sincerely, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior R. L. Moore J. C. Heatwole - Attached for your files is a copy of the revised site plan. F. E. Wymer R. W. Watkins Thomas Gilpin TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 0 Frederick County Sanitation Authority Post Office Box 618 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 Phone 665-5690 TO 6- _po. Box2/4y Ao2d'o/ DATE e JOB NO. ATTENTION o� �Y/SLawsk RE: GA ,F Loc ON S WE ARE SENDING YOU ❑ Attached ❑ Shop drawings [ 1 ❑ Copy of letter ❑ ❑ Under separate cover via Prints ❑ Plans Change order ❑ the following items: I 1 Samples ❑ Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval roved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections - ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE 19 ❑ REMARKS ❑ Resubmit copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US %�� COif'STRUGT/diY DA,d wlvrs W-4X.F4 SE M54 4 /44ES ,4`9f' .¢PPROyEp,¢�/q_� y/Sfa SEP� J COPY —. SIGNED: -r';✓ !// �-',r _.c,4�i REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Doug Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshall P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5651 The Frederick County Fire Marshall is located at 21 Court Square in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P.O. Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-4600 Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 Attn•Tom Price Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPREME BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval Location: North of Winchester in Stonewall Industrial Park (Lot 9) Fire Marshall Comments: RECENE"Ll ;0; ; Additional hydrant needed to meet Chapter 10 requirement for rear area Z Q f bldg. Sprinkler system will require another hydrant to supply same, Chapter 1( 3 Specific plans may require additional items. Need to see final plan & hydraulic requirements. Water may be a problem in this area. Fire Marshall Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO FIRE MARSHALL - PLEAS RETURN THIS FORM TO AGENT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application form. 8/23/89 0 0 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department ATTN: Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5651 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court Squard in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P.O.Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-4600 `Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC, P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 Attn•Tom Price Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPRENE BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval Location: North of Winchester in Stonewall Industrial Park (Lot 9) Inspections Department Comments: Inspect. Signature & Date: ywd� [ ( (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS - PLEA TURN THM FORM T NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. 8/Z.3 -6-/� / 8 9 Off - 61989 t OVCEIVEOBUG 2 �► ��y 9 J REQUEST Q SITE PLAN COMMENTS City of Winchester, Virginia ATTN: Tim Youmans, Planning Director 15 N. Cameron Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 667-1815 The City of Winchester offices are located in Rouss City Hall at 15 North Cameron Street in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P.O. Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-4600 ,Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 Attn:Tom Price Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPREME BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval Location: North of Winchester in Stonewall Industrial Park (Lot 9) City of Winchester Comments: City Signature and Date: � X2::� 2/"5/,a j (NOTICE TO CITY - PLEASE RED THI FORM TO THE AGMT.), NOTICE M APP I ANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please also attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. ble3 lj�/89 OCT - 61989 + 0) FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Y Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATTN: Herbert L. Sluder, Sanitation Engineer P.O. Box 2056, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 667-9747 The Frederick -Winchester Health Department is located at the intersection of Smithfield Avenue and Brick Kiln Road, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P.O.Box 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-4600 Zgent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 Attn:Tom Price Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPREME BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval 0 Location: North of Winchester in Stonewall Industrial Park (Lot 9) Health Department Comments: Health Signature and Date: ,�r�S�. f U —3_ , (NOTICE TO HEALTH DEPT. - PILEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO AGENT. NOTICE j_Q APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. WO3- 4-/--9/89 Off - 6 fggg 0 • REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Winchester Regional Airport ATTN: Kenneth F. Wiegand, Executive Director Route 1, Box 208-A, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 662-2422 The Winchester Regional Airport is located on Route 645, off Route 522 Sour'',:, if prefer to hand deliver this review f Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P Boy 5-71 Winchester, Va 22601 (763) 667-4600 Anent: G.W.CLIFFORD & ASSOC P.O. Box 2104 Winchester, Va 22601 A tn•Tom Price Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPREME BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval Location: Winchester Regional Airport Comments: Airport Signature & Date: � ( (NOTICE TO AIRPORT - PLEASE RETURN THIS ROM TO HE AGENT.) NOT 10 APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as possible it ^er ass _. `r.e agency wi--I' `r:,. -� fe,,7 __... _ pleas= r_ _ � _ _,--s and; 2'� _ ,1 fi L OCT 6 �qgg U �� U i The developer shall comply with the provisions of the Frederick County airport Zoning District (AP-1) and the following Codes of Virginia: Title 15.1 Code of Virginia, Section 489 (Purpose of Zoning Ordi'nance's) and Section 491.02 (Airport Safety Zoning). Title 5. 1 - 25. 1 Cede of Virginia (Permits Required for Erection of Certain Structures.) Engineers, architects, contractors and developers west: be aware that as'Winchester Regional Airport Expands services and operations, noise associated with such ex pans i n may increase. Although zoning may soon be suggested to Consideration should be given to insulating new and existing structures located within: one half (1/2) mile of the end of the airport runway and 1,000 feet either side of an imaginary extended center line of the airport runway. SUGGESTIONS: New Construction 49 For, new sound- i ns u 1 at ed construction, design considerations often include: using brick or concrete masonry walls, staggering studs', insulation and fiberboard under interior and exterior, finish!materials; installing attic space insulation; properly baffling vents; avoiding single .joint roof construction where interior and exterior materials are attached to the same rafters; avoiding exposed rafter ceilings; mortar should be free of pin holes and'all joints should be well sealed. Ex i st i rip Construction For rehabilitation of existing buildings, soundproofing modifications include: replacement of existing windows with windows of greater sound transmission coefficient (STC) rating, or adding a second layer of glass; upgrading doors and seals; acoustW baffling of vents; adding insulation to walls and attic spaces,; adding another layer of wall material to existing walls, in effect creating a two -panel wall; eliminating windows and fi1lAng the space to match exterior walls. 0 • REQUEST Q SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department ATTN: James Doran, Director P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5678 The Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department is located on the second floor of the Frederick County Administration Building, 9 Court Square, Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Charlie Hott P.O. Boy. 571 Winchester, Va 22601 (703) 667-46 Name of development and/or decription of the request: SUPREME BLOCK - 10 Acre Site Plan Approval Location: North of Winchester in Stonewall Industrial Park (Lot 9) Parks & Recreation Department Comments: EWI Parks Signature and Date: (NOT;M TO 5ARKS - PLMASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE AGENT.) V NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. .6/89 OCT - 6 Ka i H1'1S,0 Q!A1101111C. Planners/Engineers/Surveyors Fair Center/11240 Waples Mill Road/Suite 100/Fairfax, VA 22030 (703) 385-3566,Manassas, VA (703) 368-3124 November 13, 1898 Evan A. Wyatt, Planner I Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 Re: Supreme Block 72106-3-0038 Dear Evan, n 2 7 198:- ' Ui The review comments for the Supreme Block Site Plan are attached. These comments should be addressed prior to plan approval. Please give me a call if you have any questions. ncer y, Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Vice President CWL/jla cc: Mr. Chuck Maddox, Jr., P.E. c/o Gilbert W. Clifford Associates Hams, Snwiga &Associates, Inc. Frederick, MD/(301) 662-4488 Harris, Smar�a, Matz, Inc. Baltimore, MD/(301)486-1511 0 0 Site Plan Review Supreme Block Review Engineer: Carl Lay 72106-3-0038 Comments Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. Straw bale inlet protection required for structures #4 and #5. Also suggest standard end sections for each culvert outlet and inlet to reduce shoulder slopes and minimize erosion potential. 2. Recommend sediment traps be erected in storm conveyances #1 and #2. 3. Clearing and grading limit line should be shown along boundary of the Grimm property at the southern corner of the site. Roads and Utilities 1. Plans do not show sanitary sewer service to the industrial building. Has this been approved by FCSA? Asphalt sections on entrance road/Tyson Drive should be checked to handle wheel loads associated with block plant traffic. v/3. Temporary construction entrance should be shown on the plans. Of f Site Otading Letters of permission will be needed for grading on Lenoir City Company of Virginia property. Flood Plain A portion of the area to be developed lies within the 100 year flood plain. Within this area, grades will be raised up to 4 feet. IAW Article 19-1-1.1 of the Frederick County zoning ordinance, "a certain area within the flood plain must be capable of carrying the waters of the one hundred year flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any point." Recommend an analysis to insure compliance with this section of the code. Harris, Smariga, Orsi o, Inc. Sufveyors • Engineers • Landscape Architects • Planners FAIR CENTER-11240 WAPLES MILL ROAD FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA 22030 (703) 368-3124 • U 81989 Evan A. Wyatt, Planner I Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 November 16, 1989 INVOICE # PROJECT#72106-3-0038 PROJECT: Supreme Block FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RENDERED THRU: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HRS. RATE AMOUNT Project Manager Senior Engineer Admin. Assistant L 1.0 hrs 33.25 33.25 8.0 hrs 33.25 266.00 0.5 hrs 14.50 7.25 Total Direct Total Indirect TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE 306.50 459.75 $766.25;, Please Return Yellow Copy With Remittance A Finance Charge Will Be Applied On Unpaid Invoices I G.W.CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20 S.CAMERON ST. PO BOX 2104 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 703-667-2139 TO: Fredrick County Planning Department 9 Court Square Winchester, Va 22601 • LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PRESENT DATE JOB NO. 30 November 1989 ATTENTION Evan Wyatt RE: Supreme Block Site Plan WE ARE SENDING YOU n ATTACHED F-1 UNDER SEPARATE VIA ® HAND DELIVERED ❑ CHANGE ORDER SAMPLES SHOP DRAWINGS I -XI PRINTS ❑ PLANS COPY OF LETTER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS 1-1 SPECIFICATIONS ❑ OTHER COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 6 Revised Site Plan of Supreme Block per Consultant Comments. XX ARE TRANSMITTED APPROVED SUBMITTED XAI FOR APPROVAL APPROVED AS NOTED FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURN CORRECTIONS ❑ AS REQUESTED FOR REVIEW or COMMENT ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ____________19 REMARKS COPY TO: RESUBMITFOR APPROVAL SUBMIT____ FOR DISTRIBUTION RETURNED CORRECTED PRINTS LOAN PRINT RETURN XX RETURN WITH SIGNATURES SIGNED Tnm PrirA REV. 2.0 i etnods as to meet the intent of the im, Erosion ControlCOrdinance.R1No area sh�elett denuded for more tha calander days. 8. Contractor to clean up and restore disturbed areas immediately upon completion of pipelaying in the affected area. 9. All grayling and improvements to be confined to the project area unless otherwise indicated. 10, AJI fits material shall be compacted to 95% of theoretical maximum density as determined by A.A.S.H.O. T-99 Method A, within plus or minus 2 percentage Points of optimum moisture for 1 1 , the full width of fill section. Exact locations for sewer and water to services be a directed by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority Inspector in the field. Contractor to provide 12. assistance as the Inspector may require in this effort. Site located in Shawnee Magisterial District. 13. Site zoned M-1. f DEfG ,CCo �'i1Y Ci AFPPPG`�,�D APi,t?0V D AS NOTED �RfiECT A,ND. REVIE ay. "VEGETATION PLAN M NOTE: ALL GRASS AREAS TO BE SEEDED Wr A MI7�1'4M QE MERION *NTUCKY BLUEGAT A RATE OF 2'3 LBS. PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET AND ANNUAL RYE AT A RATE OF 1 LS. PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. NEWLY SEED AREAS SHALL BE MULCHED AT A RATE OF 70-120 LBS. PER 1,000 SQUARE FEET. AC*Q))ATE WATMING AND FERTILIZATION ARE REQUIRED TO AID THE EMERGENCE OF NF AON NAME WHITE PINE BOTANICAL NAME PINUS STROBUS SIZE HEIGHT -SPREAD 50'-80' BY 20'-40' GROWTH RATE FAST SOIL SUITABILITY TOLERANT SHADETOLERANT TOLERANT DISEASE/INSECTS BLISTER RUSTiPiNE WEEVIL HA131T ROUNDED TO PYRAMIDAL, HORIZ. OR ASCENDING BRANCHES -DISTINCT FORM -VALUE VERY HANDSOME SPECIMEN, MASS, SHERADED HEDGE, A BEAUTIFUL NATIVE PINE, GROWS WELL IN TOUGH AREAS —� WINTER ASPECTSEVEPIGPEM scale of = `s01 Sii" p• f LOT 9 STONEWALL INDUSTRIAL PARK 'il A, TER MAIN EXTEN QN RiTY I. 0 Site Plan Review Supreme Block Review Engineer: Carl Lay 72106-3-0038 Comments Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. Straw bale inlet protection required for structures #4 and #5. Also suggest standard end sections for each culvert outlet and inlet to reduce shoulder slopes and minimize erosion potential. 44 2� Recommend sediment traps be erected in storm conveyances #1 and #2. 4.7 Clearing and grading limit line should be shown along boundary of the Grimm property at the southern corner of the site. Roads and Utilities 1. Plans do not show sanitary sewer service to the industrial building. Has this been approved by FCSA? 2. Asphalt sections on entrance road/Tyson Drive should be checked to handle wheel loads associated with block plant traffic. 3.� Temporary construction entrance should be shown on the ¢� plans. Off Site Grading A%O )9-jek" y„74� 41;•-4fchi r1�C ZOrWIa G'fY sO V Pr. tters of permission will be needed for grading on sy P•Lenoir City Company of Virginia property. '00l 'Me �iC�' .0 O/vn . '. �•Q`v_ /J11/17Ot , Lr"�1 o�in� i� do �. Flood Plain A portion of the area to be developed lies within the 100 year flood plain. Within this area, grades will be raised up to 4 feet. IAW Article 19-1-1.1 of the Frederick County zoning ordinance, "a certain area within the flood plain must be capable of carrying the waters of the one hundred year flood without increasing the water surface elevation of that flood more than one foot at any point." Recommend an analysis to insure compliance with this section of the code. lan lms z r�1,r `Ti%c m ' s r7r IlAri f ' d ; e of �4 .s%Q crns.r -sc rt�io n . s 7;4 -i// 4rt4j / &4 7'Xc ed8t bF to