Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout048-87 Regency Lakes Estates (Revised) - BackfileCOUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE DATE: Mk TRANSMITTAL TIME: S5 PLEASE DELIVER PAGE(S) IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: J'.,,.., , — < COMPANY: CITY,STATE: Q>�,,� s �,r,,, o 1J C Lk k-t FAX NUMBER: a o- g 5 5- RE: TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE: Q MESSAGE: FROM: w"SQ- - TITLE: �o..,�•,`< FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT PHONE: (703) 665-5651 FAX NUMBER: (703) 678-0682 l) Nonll h) ul()un Sired P.O. flog 601 May 5, 1994 Mr. Jim Casterline Oakwood Land Development Corporation 2225 South Holden Road P.O. Box 77013 Greensboro, NC 27417-7013 Dear Mr. Casterline: COUNTY of FREDERICK John R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator 703/665-5666 FAX: 703 / 667-0370 I am writing to ask for your consideration and action on a proposal that will be mutually beneficial to your company, the residents of Regency Lakes, and Frederick County. When the original Regency Lakes site plan and master development plan was submitted in 1986, it was approved with the understanding that a traffic light would be required for Route 7 and Regency Lakes Drive at some point during project development. It was acknowledged and understood that when the Resident Engineer for the Staunton District of the Virginia Department of Transportation indicated traffic levels exist which justify this traffic light, then it would be installed by the developer or the Virginia Department of Transportation at the developer's expense. Mr. William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer for the Staunton District, has informed Frederick County that the need for a traffic light now exists at this intersection. The combination of the level of traffic generated by Regency Lakes development and the projected levels of traffic the proposed Sheetz convenience store will add to Regency Lakes Drive, has established the need for signal light control. It is important to note the original approval agreement of your development required that the Regency Lakes owners bear 100% of the costs associated with providing the traffic light. Sheetz, Inc. has recognized the impact their proposed development will have on the level of traffic on Regency Lakes Drive and has stepped forward and agreed to pay half the cost for installation of the light. This proposal from Sheetz, Inc. is very generous and one we believe you will want to grasp because of the savings to your company. 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page 2 Mr. Jim Casterline May 5, 1994 I am enclosing a copy of the agreement for your review. I would appreciate it if we could work out an agreement for the funding of this traffic light as soon as possible. I look forward to your earliest reply. Sincerely, John R. Riley, Jr. County Administrator JRR/Icb enclosure Edinburg Residency .'DOT TEL: 1—,1J--,ay4-560 a'_a -1 Q 1�:13 N o . 0 0 7 P.O1: f _ gilbert w. clifford & associates, irne. I N C 0 R R 0 RA TQp 19 72 Corporate Office: 150C Otde Greenwich Ortve s Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401-4098 • (703) 898-2115 Winchester Office: 20 South Cameron Street • P.O. Box 2104 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 • (703) 887-2139 May 30, 1986 Mr. Bill Bushman VDH&T Box 278 Edinburg, VA 22824 RE: Regency Lakes Estates Dear Bi11, ,.,r----" ---- In accordance with the various comment letters received and Included with your letter, 4f May 29, �985 to ,t1r. Robert ,W.,,Watkihs,` we "otter the following- reply."We e'ddress these items in no particular' order.: We understand --that., the hydrolog r- sues have' been dispensed with and ttiat,Aet remains is the legal issue as to how dedication of"the+oadwaj will be eccomplishad.� We understand yoar '0011cy with regard,. to two access points for the proposed, Regency Hal ghts'Subdivfsion. We will propose dedication documents consistent" with those sample documents previous] y - forwarded to us and the" owners attorney is working on this at this time. This will allow for an easement crossing of the dam in lieu of fee simple dedication. It is proposed that prior to occupancy of the first lot in the subdivision the loop road around the lake will be graded and an aggregate base material Installed so as to allow for a passible condition for subdivision traffic in the event of dam failure. A permanent easement or right-of-way along this road will be provided so as to allow the right of usage by subdivision owner's. X;?- Stnp L lgm- The owner acknowledges the tact that a stop light will be C r BOARD OF DIRECTORS Thomas J. O'Toole, P E. Charles E. Maadox, Jr., P.E. Earl R Sutherlana. a E. P. Duane Srowo. C.L.S. William L. WrlQht, Lanoratcry Oirec;or Edinburg Residency 'JDOT 7 E L : 1-703,-'a:.4-5rCi7 May 4 , -aa 1 _7 : 18 No . 00 7 P . 02,,1. clifford 6 associates, Inc. May 30, 1986 Page 2 required at some later point in project development. It is acknowledged and understood that when the Highway Resident Engineer indicates traffic levels exist which justify this stop light, then it will be installed by the developer or the department at the developers expense. A note to this effect has been added to the plans to satisfy County requests on this matter. ,T- Rt. Entr-anrtz In order to meet your requirements, the east bound lone has been provided with a full 200 foot taper and 200 foot stacking lane. The width of the turning lane on the east bound and decell lane on the west bound lane have been changed to 12 feet from 10 feet. We have provlded a 3 tot taper on the west bound lane as requested. The turning radius on the east side of the project intersactlon was shown to be 15 feet in order to maintain the road improvements within the existing right-of-way. A 40 foot radius will require the addition of right-of-way. It 1s not known at this writing if such an acquisition is possible, however, we are checking. It should be pointed out that the purpose of the pavement widening and traffic control stripes was to allow for adequate turning radius on a single lane end condition. With a 16 foot single lane into the project, we believe adequate radius exist with the 15 foot radius shown. We do acknowledge that a larger radius would be better and we are attempting to work this out and will reply as soon as possible. d-Cc rr z'�c! Rntrd/7ca- The commercial entrance design standards have been revised to conform to your request. Also the location of these entrances are to be fixed persuont to the 25 footset back from curb return points. The lane configuration at Edinburg Residency VDOT TEL: 1-103-90-4-5607 i d. w. clifford &, associates, Inc. May 30, 1986 Page 3 May 4 , 94 13 : 18 No . 00 P . 03%i the entrance has been revised persuent to your request. The existing culvert and guard rail at the crossover point on Rt. 7 have been shown as not existing in accordance with actual field conditions. S- 67tr&W& k[�&d- We acknowledge the fact that the degree of curvature at the first horizontal curve on the entrance road is minimum In nature. We have discussed this situation with the owner early on in the design and he has attempted to obtain additional right-of-way to increase this curve radius and has been unsuccessful. We understand that the geometric design as proposed including additional curb and gutter as revised on the attached plans is satisfactory to meet urban design conditions and is therefore satisfactory for this project. 6- Estot8 &k w KoM We have revised Estate Drive to shown a 22 foot instead of a 20 toot width in accordance with your request. �- Ex�sifng Utilities Sitr.�at�rax We acknowledge your concern with respect to gas main and electric line locations with respect to roadways. The contractor has been informed of special conditions relating to this situation and a preconstruction conference on this project will be held, including represenatives from each utility as well as the Ya. Dept. of Highways to further coordinate this issue. c� Utflity Rerrslnrrs Please note the attached letter dated May 30, 1905, to Mr. Edinburg Residency JDOT TEL: 1-7 Maq 4,94 13:18 No.007 P.04ir f. Clifford & associates, inc. May 30, 1906 Page 4 Weiiington ,tones which itemizes certain utility changes which have been mode but which not affect your situation except for you to know that they exist. 9- Odm Plwn z- Certain minor revisions to the dam plans have been made consistent with comments made from the hydrology section. The 50 foot spillwey has been retained in lieu of the 40 foot for conservative design purposes. l0- payerr?nt O�si,�ix We acknowledge o letter from Mr. Don Keith, of May 28, 1986, which establishes certain design sections for Pavement on this project persuant to a traffic analysis performed by the YDH&T Traffic section in Richmond, Yo. We understand that these design sections are tenetive and are given to the owner for the expressed purpose of budgeting for construction costs. Actual sizing of Pavement would be done after CBR Tests are available. We understand that your office must run the CBR's, and this would be just prior to the point of establishing sub -grade on this project. Attached is a summery list of our original design and also what you propose as a design section. Due to the substantial difference between these two pavement designs and the attendent increase cost, we expect more dialog between the developer, the engineer, and the Highway Dept. to continue on this subject. Since this is normally a matter which is ironed out during the construction process, it is our understanding that this matter need not be decided out prior to conditions of the site plan approval by Frederick County, Ya. For this reason, the owner desires to proceed with CDR tests and perform additional design studies prior to on actual determination of pavement design, Edinburg Residency JDOT TEL: 1-703-984-5'607 May 4,94 13:13 No.007 P.OS;, clifford & associates, inc. ,.ny 30, 1 g86 Page 5 We trust the above is a complete summary of your concerns and we trust our replies have bee n satisfactory. It in your review you hove any questions or comments, we would appreciate hearing from you at your earliest convenience. We are returning your red marked plans for your quick reference. We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter and we look forward to any reply you may have. Sincerely yours, Charles E. Maddox, Jr., Vice President cc: Mr. Al Smith Mr, Bob Watkins, Frederick County Planner Mr. Rupert Werner, Perry Engineering Co., Inc. Mr. John Dri ggs, Dri ggs Corp. Mr. Don Fowler Mr. Bonnie Benham Ott CEM,Jr/ jew Edinburg Residency VDOT TEL: 1-703-984-5607 Mau 4,94 15:18 No.007 P.06i0 Fklinburg, Virginia 22824 (703) 984-4133 •lay 29 , 1986 Mr. Robert W. Watkins Planning Dii"ec_:r C/O Department of Planning & Development 9 Court Square, F. O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Bob: This is in regard to the need for comments from us relative to the final site plan approval for Regency Lake Estates Subdivision. Our comments here are not to be construed by any one as final approval by the Department of Highways and - a.-�sportation of this subdivision plan. Final drainage analysis and actual Pavement design are incomplete and will be incorporated .nto the approved final design plans when available. Interim designs have been furnished the developer and his engineer for planning purposes. The basic plan and most roadway features have been reviewed previously by the Department and accepted or modified for acceptance. If :re dam concept is retained, the previously furnished agreement governing the access to Phase I must be formulated. A guide has been furnished. The proposed entrance on Route 7 must include the features as outlined in the memorandum from Mr. J. B. Diam=d, Staunton District Traffic Engineer, ropy attached. This includes all work associated with adjusting the median crossover and attendant turn lanes. You will note Mr. Diamond indicates the full development scheme will require the installation cf a traffic signa_1 at this location, the cost of which is the developer's responsibility. Also attached for your review are the ccranants made by Ms. D. L. Camper, Assistant Secondary Roads Engineer. We understand the developer and his engineer have been informed of them previously, t1hough to date we nave not seen plans reflecting these changes. we would hope th-,s provides you with sufficient information to make your judgements. If additional clarification is necessary please let us know. Sincerely, W. H. Bu-slunan, P. E. Resident, xC: Delegate Alson H. Smith, Mr. C. E. Maddox, Mr. K. D. Walker COMMONWEALTH of VIRQ1NIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 November 16, 1990 - o4V i7 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Mr. Heiko Mues Ref: Proposed Entrance C/O Driggs Associates Regency Lakes Estates 4061 Powder Mill Rd., Suite 400 Phase I, Section B Calverton, MD 20705 Frederick County Dear Mr. Mues: This is to acknowledge receipt of the above referenced project's revised site plans dated November 12, 1990. The resubmit plans appear satisfactory and are therefore approved. Please ensure the developer understands if Regency Lakes Drive is to be considered eligible for ultimate acceptance into the State's Secondary Road System, all entrance design and drainage features to this parcel must be built in accordance with these approved plans. Also, since this project lies on a portion of Regency Lakes Drive yet to be constructed, please ensure he understands our construction specifications and requirements. For his use I am enclosing a copy of Information Needed Prior to Acceptance of Subdivisions Streets into the State Secondary System. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Transp. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf Attach. xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. J. C. Heatwole Mr. F. E. Wymer (w/ copy of plans) Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. G. W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 0 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Departments of Planning and Building 703/665-5650 LAND DISTURBING PERMIT For land disturbing activity at Regency Lake Estates ISSUED TO: Mr. James Marlow who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. Approving Signatur��,�����„��,_ Date: NOTICE OF RIGHT TO INSPECT An agent of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the approved plan. Signature of Appli NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of the site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 0 AGREEMENT 0 THIS AGREEMENT, made this by and between —6nA w day of , 14d , party (parties) of the first part; and the COUNTY OF FREDERiCK, VIRGINIA, party of the second part; WHEREAS, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part f this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit known as OA and the party of the second part r uir g the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction & before final occupancy, the party (parties) of the first part, his or its heirs and assigns agree to do the following work. 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading, and construction, all conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per site plan #% In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused its corporate n mes and #LM�� e hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by ► duly attested $ av <occ�e-r:d/ and caused this agreement o be ackno ledged and delivered for and in its behalf. %� / X.--n ,. CORP-04RAT I OILY BY (SEAL) Attest: STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK I, ot� the State And__Coupty aforesaid, , a Notary Public in and for ereby certify that wlYose names are signed to the foregoing agreement, this day personally appeared before me in my State and County aforesaid and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this 41,Adz day of �� , 1 9W NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires Agreement Page 2 In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by Kris C. Tierney , its Zoning Administrator , duly attested by A. Bray_ Cockeril 1 ► Planner I, and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf by its said Director and Deputy Director. WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE AND SEAL: COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA Zoning Administrator Frederick County Department of Planning and Development (SEAL) Attest: STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK a Notary Public in and for the State and CoOnty aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day pe son ll appeared before me in my said County, �. ,'ing Director of the Frederick ounty De p rtm t of Planning �anrdr development and -�e-�B-i-rec-er of 1he Frederick County DeparEr&nt of Planning and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing and hereunto annexed agreement dated 6jj°;q a gg , and each then and there personally and severally acknowledged the said agreement for and on behalf of the said County of Frederick, Virginia, and acknowledged that the seal thereto affixed is the true and genuine seal of the County of Frederick, Virginia. Given under my hand thiscZW,/day of G�e/� 19 My commission expires day of Qi' , 19Z. &A'l j - R4ff'�� NOTARY PUBLI 0 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Departments of Planning and Building M E M 0 R A N D U M 703/665-5650 TO: VA. Dept. of Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington H. Jones Greenwood Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Walt Cunningham Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. Kenneth Coffelt Planning and Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin , ATTN: FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan (Revised) Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning (Revised) We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates , or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. ------•--------------------------------------------------------------------------- THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: Signature Date 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 0 TO. COUNTY of FREDERI Departments of Planning and Buildii M E M O R A N D U M 703/665-56: VA. Dept. of Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington H. Jones Greenwood Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Walt Cunningham Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. Kenneth Coffelt Planning and Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin ATTN: FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan (Revised) Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning (Revised) We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: — _ _ - ✓ L {-% l ( / •L Z _! ( —Td 7 ✓ ♦ �1 ---- lS$ - c� ._ter Signature -Ct--�,.- �_,� Date i • FCS-'A To TO: P ,3 1987 COUNTY of FREDERIC' Departments of Planning and Buildii MEMORANDUM 703/665-56 VA. Dept. of Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington H. Jones Greenwood Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Walt Cunningham Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. Kenneth Coffelt Planning and Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin , ATTN: FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Subdivision Conditional Use Permit X Master Development Plan (Revised) X Site Plan (Revised) Rezoning We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates , or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: ND Ca ,¢ T 7iW 5 Signature s'/I/ Date SEi° a7Y d�� ��C1f• CpG� S r F 19W `9W MEMOa_ NDUM TO: COUNTY of FREDERICK Departments of Planning and Building 703/665-5650 VA. Dept. of Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington H. Jones Greenwood Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Walt Cunningham Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. Kenneth Coffelt Planning and Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin , ATTN: FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan (Revised) Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning (Revised) We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates , or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: No objection to the revised master developement plan. However, before we can comment any further, we would need a complete set of subdivision plans for our review and comments. Signature •�j�Jfi�r�i� T��, Date Ql;231B? • i TO: COUNTY of FREDERICK Departments of Planning and Building M E M 0 R A N D U M 703/665-5650 VA. Dept. of Transportation , ATTN: Mr. William H. Bushman Sanitation Authority , ATTN: Mr. Wellington H. Jones Greenwood Fire Company , ATTN: Mr. Walt Cunningham Inspections Department , ATTN: Mr. Kenneth Coffelt Planning and Zoning Department , ATTN: Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin , ATTN: FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE:, September 21, 1987 SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan (Revised) Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning (Revised) We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates , or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139 Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as possible. THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS: d Signature , Date i G.W.CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC. 20 S.CAMERON ST. PO BOX 2104 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 703-667-2139 TO LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL PRESENT DATE JOB September 15, 1987 ATTENTION Mr, Steve Gyurisin RE: ReaencuLakes Estates WE ARE SENDING YOU � ATTACHED UNDER SEPARATE VIA THE FOLLOWIN— ITEMb HAND CARRIED ❑ CHANGE ORDER 7 SAMPLES F SPECIFICATIONS SHOP DRAWINGS FT-1 PRINTS ❑ PLANS ❑ OTHER ❑ COPY OF LETTER COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION 10 6187 e V Ma ti ARE TRANSMITTED APPROVED/SUBMITTED 7 RESUBMITFOR APPROVAL FOR APPROVAL F1APPROVED/AS NOTED SUBMIT___ FOR DISTRIBUTION X❑ FOR YOUR USE ❑ RETURN/CORRECTIONS RETURNED__ CORRECTED PRINTS AS REQUESTED ❑ LOAN PRINT/RETURN FOR REVIEW or COMMENT RETURN/WITH SIGNATURES 0 FOR BIDS DUE 19___ REMARKS COPY TO: SIGNED Mr. Scot W. Marsh REV. 2.0