HomeMy WebLinkAbout048-87 Regency Lakes Estates (Revised) - BackfileCOUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703 / 665-5651
Fax 703 / 678-0682
FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE
DATE: Mk TRANSMITTAL TIME: S5
PLEASE DELIVER PAGE(S) IMMEDIATELY TO:
NAME: J'.,,.., , — <
COMPANY:
CITY,STATE: Q>�,,� s �,r,,, o 1J C Lk k-t
FAX NUMBER: a o- g 5 5-
RE:
TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER PAGE: Q
MESSAGE:
FROM: w"SQ- -
TITLE: �o..,�•,`<
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PHONE: (703) 665-5651
FAX NUMBER: (703) 678-0682
l) Nonll h) ul()un Sired P.O. flog 601
May 5, 1994
Mr. Jim Casterline
Oakwood Land Development Corporation
2225 South Holden Road
P.O. Box 77013
Greensboro, NC 27417-7013
Dear Mr. Casterline:
COUNTY of FREDERICK
John R. Riley, Jr.
County Administrator
703/665-5666
FAX: 703 / 667-0370
I am writing to ask for your consideration and action on a proposal that will be mutually
beneficial to your company, the residents of Regency Lakes, and Frederick County.
When the original Regency Lakes site plan and master development plan was
submitted in 1986, it was approved with the understanding that a traffic light would be
required for Route 7 and Regency Lakes Drive at some point during project
development. It was acknowledged and understood that when the Resident Engineer
for the Staunton District of the Virginia Department of Transportation indicated traffic
levels exist which justify this traffic light, then it would be installed by the developer or
the Virginia Department of Transportation at the developer's expense.
Mr. William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer for the Staunton District, has informed
Frederick County that the need for a traffic light now exists at this intersection. The
combination of the level of traffic generated by Regency Lakes development and the
projected levels of traffic the proposed Sheetz convenience store will add to Regency
Lakes Drive, has established the need for signal light control.
It is important to note the original approval agreement of your development required
that the Regency Lakes owners bear 100% of the costs associated with providing the
traffic light. Sheetz, Inc. has recognized the impact their proposed development will
have on the level of traffic on Regency Lakes Drive and has stepped forward and
agreed to pay half the cost for installation of the light. This proposal from Sheetz, Inc.
is very generous and one we believe you will want to grasp because of the savings to
your company.
9 Court Square P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604
Page 2
Mr. Jim Casterline
May 5, 1994
I am enclosing a copy of the agreement for your review. I would appreciate it if we
could work out an agreement for the funding of this traffic light as soon as possible. I
look forward to your earliest reply.
Sincerely,
John R. Riley, Jr.
County Administrator
JRR/Icb
enclosure
Edinburg Residency .'DOT TEL: 1—,1J--,ay4-560 a'_a -1 Q 1�:13 N o . 0 0 7 P.O1:
f _ gilbert w. clifford & associates, irne.
I N C 0 R R 0 RA TQp 19 72
Corporate Office: 150C Otde Greenwich Ortve s Fredericksburg, Virginia 22401-4098 • (703) 898-2115
Winchester Office: 20 South Cameron Street • P.O. Box 2104 • Winchester, Virginia 22601 • (703) 887-2139
May 30, 1986
Mr. Bill Bushman
VDH&T
Box 278
Edinburg, VA 22824 RE: Regency Lakes Estates
Dear Bi11, ,.,r----" ----
In accordance with the various comment letters received and Included
with your letter, 4f May 29, �985 to ,t1r. Robert ,W.,,Watkihs,` we "otter the
following- reply."We e'ddress these items in no particular' order.:
We understand --that., the hydrolog r- sues have' been
dispensed with and ttiat,Aet remains is the legal issue as
to how dedication of"the+oadwaj will be eccomplishad.�
We understand yoar '0011cy with regard,. to two access
points for the proposed, Regency Hal ghts'Subdivfsion. We
will propose dedication documents consistent" with those
sample documents previous] y - forwarded to us and the"
owners attorney is working on this at this time. This will
allow for an easement crossing of the dam in lieu of fee
simple dedication. It is proposed that prior to occupancy
of the first lot in the subdivision the loop road around the
lake will be graded and an aggregate base material
Installed so as to allow for a passible condition for
subdivision traffic in the event of dam failure. A
permanent easement or right-of-way along this road will
be provided so as to allow the right of usage by
subdivision owner's.
X;?- Stnp L lgm-
The owner acknowledges the tact that a stop light will be
C r BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Thomas J. O'Toole, P E. Charles E. Maadox, Jr., P.E. Earl R Sutherlana. a E.
P. Duane Srowo. C.L.S. William L. WrlQht, Lanoratcry Oirec;or
Edinburg Residency 'JDOT 7 E L : 1-703,-'a:.4-5rCi7
May 4 , -aa 1 _7 : 18 No . 00 7 P . 02,,1.
clifford 6 associates, Inc.
May 30, 1986
Page 2
required at some later point in project development. It is
acknowledged and understood that when the Highway
Resident Engineer indicates traffic levels exist which
justify this stop light, then it will be installed by the
developer or the department at the developers expense. A
note to this effect has been added to the plans to satisfy
County requests on this matter.
,T- Rt. Entr-anrtz
In order to meet your requirements, the east bound lone
has been provided with a full 200 foot taper and 200 foot
stacking lane. The width of the turning lane on the east
bound and decell lane on the west bound lane have been
changed to 12 feet from 10 feet. We have provlded a 3 tot
taper on the west bound lane as requested. The turning
radius on the east side of the project intersactlon was
shown to be 15 feet in order to maintain the road
improvements within the existing right-of-way. A 40 foot
radius will require the addition of right-of-way. It 1s not
known at this writing if such an acquisition is possible,
however, we are checking. It should be pointed out that
the purpose of the pavement widening and traffic control
stripes was to allow for adequate turning radius on a
single lane end condition. With a 16 foot single lane into
the project, we believe adequate radius exist with the 15
foot radius shown. We do acknowledge that a larger radius
would be better and we are attempting to work this out
and will reply as soon as possible.
d-Cc rr z'�c! Rntrd/7ca-
The commercial entrance design standards have been
revised to conform to your request. Also the location of
these entrances are to be fixed persuont to the 25 footset
back from curb return points. The lane configuration at
Edinburg Residency VDOT TEL: 1-103-90-4-5607
i
d. w. clifford &, associates, Inc.
May 30, 1986
Page 3
May 4 , 94 13 : 18 No . 00 P . 03%i
the entrance has been revised persuent to your request.
The existing culvert and guard rail at the crossover point
on Rt. 7 have been shown as not existing in accordance
with actual field conditions.
S- 67tr&W& k[�&d-
We acknowledge the fact that the degree of curvature at
the first horizontal curve on the entrance road is minimum
In nature. We have discussed this situation with the
owner early on in the design and he has attempted to
obtain additional right-of-way to increase this curve
radius and has been unsuccessful. We understand that the
geometric design as proposed including additional curb and
gutter as revised on the attached plans is satisfactory to
meet urban design conditions and is therefore satisfactory
for this project.
6- Estot8 &k w KoM
We have revised Estate Drive to shown a 22 foot instead of
a 20 toot width in accordance with your request.
�- Ex�sifng Utilities Sitr.�at�rax
We acknowledge your concern with respect to gas main and
electric line locations with respect to roadways. The
contractor has been informed of special conditions
relating to this situation and a preconstruction conference
on this project will be held, including represenatives from
each utility as well as the Ya. Dept. of Highways to further
coordinate this issue.
c� Utflity Rerrslnrrs
Please note the attached letter dated May 30, 1905, to Mr.
Edinburg Residency JDOT TEL: 1-7
Maq 4,94 13:18 No.007 P.04ir
f. Clifford & associates, inc.
May 30, 1906
Page 4
Weiiington ,tones which itemizes certain utility changes
which have been mode but which not affect your situation
except for you to know that they exist.
9- Odm Plwn z-
Certain minor revisions to the dam plans have been made
consistent with comments made from the hydrology
section. The 50 foot spillwey has been retained in lieu of
the 40 foot for conservative design purposes.
l0- payerr?nt O�si,�ix
We acknowledge o letter from Mr. Don Keith, of May 28,
1986, which establishes certain design sections for
Pavement on this project persuant to a traffic analysis
performed by the YDH&T Traffic section in Richmond, Yo.
We understand that these design sections are tenetive and
are given to the owner for the expressed purpose of
budgeting for construction costs. Actual sizing of
Pavement would be done after CBR Tests are available. We
understand that your office must run the CBR's, and this
would be just prior to the point of establishing sub -grade
on this project. Attached is a summery list of our original
design and also what you propose as a design section. Due
to the substantial difference between these two pavement
designs and the attendent increase cost, we expect more
dialog between the developer, the engineer, and the
Highway Dept. to continue on this subject. Since this is
normally a matter which is ironed out during the
construction process, it is our understanding that this
matter need not be decided out prior to conditions of the
site plan approval by Frederick County, Ya. For this
reason, the owner desires to proceed with CDR tests and
perform additional design studies prior to on actual
determination of pavement design,
Edinburg Residency JDOT TEL: 1-703-984-5'607 May 4,94 13:13 No.007 P.OS;,
clifford & associates, inc.
,.ny 30, 1 g86
Page 5
We trust the above is a complete summary of your concerns and we
trust our replies have bee n satisfactory. It in your review you hove any
questions or comments, we would appreciate hearing from you at your
earliest convenience. We are returning your red marked plans for your
quick reference. We thank you for your prompt attention to this matter
and we look forward to any reply you may have.
Sincerely yours,
Charles E. Maddox, Jr.,
Vice President
cc: Mr. Al Smith
Mr, Bob Watkins,
Frederick County Planner
Mr. Rupert Werner,
Perry Engineering Co., Inc.
Mr. John Dri ggs,
Dri ggs Corp.
Mr. Don Fowler
Mr. Bonnie Benham
Ott
CEM,Jr/ jew
Edinburg Residency VDOT TEL: 1-703-984-5607
Mau 4,94 15:18 No.007 P.06i0
Fklinburg, Virginia 22824
(703) 984-4133
•lay 29 , 1986
Mr. Robert W. Watkins
Planning Dii"ec_:r
C/O Department of Planning & Development
9 Court Square, F. O. Box 601
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Dear Bob:
This is in regard to the need for comments from us relative to the final site
plan approval for Regency Lake Estates Subdivision. Our comments here are not to
be construed by any one as final approval by the Department of Highways and
- a.-�sportation of this subdivision plan. Final drainage analysis and actual
Pavement design are incomplete and will be incorporated .nto the approved final
design plans when available. Interim designs have been furnished the developer
and his engineer for planning purposes.
The basic plan and most roadway features have been reviewed previously by the
Department and accepted or modified for acceptance. If :re dam concept is
retained, the previously furnished agreement governing the access to Phase I must
be formulated. A guide has been furnished.
The proposed entrance on Route 7 must include the features as
outlined in the memorandum from Mr. J. B. Diam=d, Staunton District Traffic
Engineer, ropy attached. This includes all work associated with adjusting the
median crossover and attendant turn lanes. You will note Mr. Diamond indicates
the full development scheme will require the installation cf a traffic signa_1 at
this location, the cost of which is the developer's responsibility.
Also attached for your review are the ccranants made by Ms. D. L. Camper,
Assistant Secondary Roads Engineer. We understand the developer and his engineer
have been informed of them previously, t1hough to date we nave not seen plans
reflecting these changes.
we would hope th-,s provides you with sufficient information to make your
judgements. If additional clarification is necessary please let us know.
Sincerely,
W. H. Bu-slunan, P. E.
Resident,
xC: Delegate Alson H. Smith, Mr. C. E. Maddox, Mr. K. D. Walker
COMMONWEALTH of VIRQ1NIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. O. BOX 278
RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824
COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133
November 16, 1990
- o4V i7
WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Mr. Heiko Mues Ref: Proposed Entrance
C/O Driggs Associates Regency Lakes Estates
4061 Powder Mill Rd., Suite 400 Phase I, Section B
Calverton, MD 20705 Frederick County
Dear Mr. Mues:
This is to acknowledge receipt of the above referenced project's revised site
plans dated November 12, 1990. The resubmit plans appear satisfactory and are
therefore approved.
Please ensure the developer understands if Regency Lakes Drive is to be
considered eligible for ultimate acceptance into the State's Secondary Road
System, all entrance design and drainage features to this parcel must be built
in accordance with these approved plans. Also, since this project lies on a
portion of Regency Lakes Drive yet to be constructed, please ensure he
understands our construction specifications and requirements. For his use I
am enclosing a copy of Information Needed Prior to Acceptance of Subdivisions
Streets into the State Secondary System.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Sincerely,
William H. Bushman
Transp. Resident Engineer
By: Robert B. Childress
Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior
RBC/rf
Attach.
xc: Mr.
J.
B.
Diamond
Mr.
J.
C.
Heatwole
Mr.
F.
E.
Wymer (w/ copy of plans)
Mr.
R.
W.
Watkins
Mr.
G.
W.
Clifford & Assoc., Inc.
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
0
•
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Departments of Planning and Building
703/665-5650
LAND DISTURBING PERMIT
For land disturbing activity at Regency Lake Estates
ISSUED TO: Mr. James Marlow
who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation
Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and
Development.
Approving Signatur��,�����„��,_
Date:
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO INSPECT
An agent of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development shall be
permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control
measures shown in the approved plan.
Signature of Appli
NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of the site plan. This
permit is for land disturbance only.
9 Court Square
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, Virginia
22601
0
AGREEMENT
0
THIS AGREEMENT, made this
by and between —6nA w
day of , 14d ,
party (parties) of the first part; and the COUNTY OF FREDERiCK,
VIRGINIA, party of the second part;
WHEREAS, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second
part f this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit known as
OA and the party of the second
part r uir g the following work to be completed during the land
disturbance construction & before final occupancy, the party
(parties) of the first part, his or its heirs and assigns agree to do
the following work.
1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by
temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will
be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading, and
construction, all conformity with the Virginia Erosion and
Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the
Code of Virginia and local code laws.
2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per site plan #%
In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused
its corporate n mes and #LM��
e hereunto affixed, for and in its
behalf, by ►
duly attested $ av <occ�e-r:d/ and caused
this agreement o be ackno ledged and delivered for and in its
behalf. %� / X.--n ,.
CORP-04RAT I OILY
BY
(SEAL)
Attest:
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
I, ot�
the State And__Coupty aforesaid,
, a Notary Public in and for
ereby certify that
wlYose names are signed to the foregoing agreement, this day
personally appeared before me in my State and County aforesaid and
acknowledged the same.
Given under my hand this 41,Adz day of �� , 1 9W
NOTARY PUBLIC
My Commission Expires
Agreement
Page 2
In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto
caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for
and in its behalf, by Kris C. Tierney ,
its Zoning Administrator , duly attested by A. Bray_ Cockeril 1 ►
Planner I, and caused this agreement to be
acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf by its said Director
and Deputy Director.
WITNESS THE FOLLOWING SIGNATURE AND SEAL:
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA
Zoning Administrator
Frederick County Department of
Planning and Development
(SEAL)
Attest:
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
a Notary Public in and for the
State and CoOnty aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day
pe son ll appeared before me in my said County,
�. ,'ing Director of the Frederick
ounty De p rtm t of Planning �anrdr development and
-�e-�B-i-rec-er of 1he Frederick County
DeparEr&nt of Planning and Development, whose names are signed to the
foregoing and hereunto annexed agreement dated
6jj°;q a gg , and each then and there personally and
severally acknowledged the said agreement for and on behalf of the
said County of Frederick, Virginia, and acknowledged that the seal
thereto affixed is the true and genuine seal of the County of
Frederick, Virginia.
Given under my hand thiscZW,/day of G�e/� 19
My commission expires day of Qi' , 19Z.
&A'l j - R4ff'��
NOTARY PUBLI
0
•
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Departments of Planning and Building
M E M 0 R A N D U M 703/665-5650
TO:
VA. Dept. of Transportation
, ATTN:
Mr.
William H. Bushman
Sanitation Authority
, ATTN:
Mr.
Wellington H. Jones
Greenwood Fire Company
, ATTN:
Mr.
Walt Cunningham
Inspections Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Kenneth Coffelt
Planning and Zoning Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Stephen M. Gyurisin
, ATTN:
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan
(Revised)
Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning
(Revised)
We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates ,
or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139
Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as
possible.
------•---------------------------------------------------------------------------
THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS:
Signature
Date
9 Court Square
- P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
0
TO.
COUNTY of FREDERI
Departments of Planning and Buildii
M E M O R A N D U M 703/665-56:
VA. Dept. of Transportation
, ATTN:
Mr.
William H. Bushman
Sanitation Authority
, ATTN:
Mr.
Wellington H. Jones
Greenwood Fire Company
, ATTN:
Mr.
Walt Cunningham
Inspections Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Kenneth Coffelt
Planning and Zoning Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Stephen M. Gyurisin
ATTN:
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan
(Revised)
Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning
(Revised)
We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates
or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139
Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as
possible.
THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS:
— _ _ - ✓ L {-% l ( / •L Z _! (
—Td 7 ✓ ♦ �1
---- lS$ - c� ._ter
Signature -Ct--�,.- �_,� Date
i
•
FCS-'A
To
TO:
P ,3 1987
COUNTY of FREDERIC'
Departments of Planning and Buildii
MEMORANDUM 703/665-56
VA. Dept. of Transportation
, ATTN:
Mr.
William H. Bushman
Sanitation Authority
, ATTN:
Mr.
Wellington H. Jones
Greenwood Fire Company
, ATTN:
Mr.
Walt Cunningham
Inspections Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Kenneth Coffelt
Planning and Zoning Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Stephen M. Gyurisin
, ATTN:
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Review Comments On:
Subdivision
Conditional Use Permit
X Master Development Plan
(Revised)
X Site Plan
(Revised)
Rezoning
We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates ,
or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139
Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as
possible.
THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS:
ND Ca ,¢ T 7iW 5
Signature s'/I/ Date SEi° a7Y d��
��C1f• CpG� S r F 19W `9W
MEMOa_ NDUM
TO:
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Departments of Planning and Building
703/665-5650
VA. Dept. of Transportation
, ATTN:
Mr.
William H. Bushman
Sanitation Authority
, ATTN:
Mr.
Wellington H. Jones
Greenwood Fire Company
, ATTN:
Mr.
Walt Cunningham
Inspections Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Kenneth Coffelt
Planning and Zoning Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Stephen M. Gyurisin
, ATTN:
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE: September 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan
(Revised)
Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning
(Revised)
We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates ,
or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139
Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as
possible.
THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS:
No objection to the revised master
developement plan. However, before we
can comment any further, we would need a complete set of subdivision
plans for our review and comments.
Signature •�j�Jfi�r�i� T��, Date Ql;231B?
•
i
TO:
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Departments of Planning and Building
M E M 0 R A N D U M 703/665-5650
VA. Dept. of Transportation
, ATTN:
Mr.
William H. Bushman
Sanitation Authority
, ATTN:
Mr.
Wellington H. Jones
Greenwood Fire Company
, ATTN:
Mr.
Walt Cunningham
Inspections Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Kenneth Coffelt
Planning and Zoning Department
, ATTN:
Mr.
Stephen M. Gyurisin
, ATTN:
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Director DATE:, September 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Review Comments On: Conditional Use Permit X Site Plan
(Revised)
Subdivision X Master Development Plan Rezoning
(Revised)
We are reviewing the enclosed request by Regency Lakes Estates ,
or their representative, Scott W. Marsh 667-2139
Will you please review the attached and return your comments to me as soon as
possible.
THIS SPACE SHOULD BE USED FOR REVIEW COMMENTS:
d
Signature ,
Date
i
G.W.CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
20 S.CAMERON ST.
PO BOX 2104
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601
703-667-2139
TO
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
PRESENT DATE
JOB
September 15, 1987
ATTENTION Mr, Steve Gyurisin
RE: ReaencuLakes Estates
WE ARE SENDING YOU
�
ATTACHED
UNDER SEPARATE
VIA THE FOLLOWIN— ITEMb
HAND CARRIED
❑ CHANGE ORDER
7
SAMPLES
F SPECIFICATIONS
SHOP DRAWINGS
FT-1
PRINTS
❑ PLANS
❑ OTHER
❑ COPY OF LETTER
COPIES DATE DESCRIPTION
10 6187 e V Ma
ti
ARE TRANSMITTED
APPROVED/SUBMITTED
7
RESUBMITFOR APPROVAL
FOR APPROVAL
F1APPROVED/AS NOTED
SUBMIT___ FOR DISTRIBUTION
X❑
FOR YOUR USE
❑ RETURN/CORRECTIONS
RETURNED__ CORRECTED PRINTS
AS REQUESTED
❑
LOAN PRINT/RETURN
FOR REVIEW or COMMENT
RETURN/WITH SIGNATURES
0
FOR BIDS DUE
19___
REMARKS
COPY TO: SIGNED Mr. Scot W. Marsh
REV. 2.0