Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout005-05 The Marathon Bank - 1.0 Acres RA to B2 - Back Creek - Backfilem 0 m 0 LL DATE NO. V 2 t�.. 17- RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS' ------_ _-_ 1-fir ..DOLLARS FOR AMTOF7m,, ACCOUNT I7BY- AMT.PAIDBALANCE� DUE 6 REZONING TRACKING SH#f Check List: Fee & Sign Deposit Application Form Deed Proffer Statement Plat/Survey - Impact Analysis v' Taxes Paid Statement Adjoiner List Impact Model Run DATE ES Application received/file opened '— Reference manual updated/number assigned D-base updated �sS OS Copy of adjoiner list given to staff member for verification Four sets of adjoiner labels ordered from data processing os— One 8'/2" x 11" black and white location map ordered from Mapping File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary APPROVFI, PC public hearing date ACTION: I c� BOS public hearing date ACTION: AP Rtti't!R-n Nk Signecteopy of resolution for-amendmentof ordinance, with conditions proffered [if applicable], received from County Administrator's office and given to office manager for placement in the Proffers Notebook. (Note: If rezoning has no o S- proffers, resolution goes in Amendments Without Proffers Notebook.) Action letter mailed to applicant Reference manual and D-base updated File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary (final action) File given to Mapping/GIS to update zoning map Zoning map amended U \CerohCommonwackmg. r" Revised 05/09/02 lb d9 Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 May 12, 2005 Mr. Charles E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP Patton Harris Rust & Associates PC 117 E. Piccadilly St., Ste. 200 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: REZONING #05-05, MARATHON BANK Dear Chuck: This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of May 11, 2005. The above -referenced application was approved to rezone 1.0 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (Business General) District with proffers. The subject properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (Route 50W), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 Interchange and are identified with Property Identification Numbers 5313-3-5, 5313-3-6, 5313-3-7, and 5313-3-8, in the Back Creek Magisterial District. The proffer that was approved as a part of this rezoning application is unique to this property and is binding regardless of ownership. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted proffer statement for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this rezoning application. Sincerely, Ok. AA� Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad Attachment cc: The Marathon Bank, PO Box 998, Stephens City, VA 22655 Barbara E. Van Osten, Board of Supervisors, Back Creek District Cordell Watt and Greg Unger, Back Creek Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 REZONING APPLICATION #05-05 MARATHON BANK Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: May 4, 2005 Staff Contact: Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 04/20/05 Recommended Approval Board of Supervisors: 05/11/05 Pending APFRO"JT'?) PROPOSAL: To rezone 1.0 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (Business General) District with proffers. LOCATION: South side of Northwestern Pike (Route 50W), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 Interchange. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER(S): 53B-3-5, 53B-3-6, 53B-3-7, 53B-3-8 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) District PRESENT USE: Single Family Residence and Commercial (Kathy's Tortuga Restaurant) ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Area) Use: Residential B2 (Business General/ Use: Vacant MS (Medical Support) South: RA (Rural Area) Use: Residential East: RA (Rural Area) Use: Commercial (7-Eleven) West: RA (Rural Area) Use: Vacant/Agricultural Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 2 PROPOSED USES: Commercial (Limited to general office and bank with a gross floor area not to exceed 8,000 square feet) REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: The Edinburg Residency has completed the review of the TIA for the Marathon Bank rezoning proposal and offers the following comments: VDOT agrees that at the proposed build -out, the site will generate approximately 1,716 trips per day. This will mean an additional 3% increase on the intersection volumes. VDOT agrees that the level of service of the Route 50 and Ward Avenue intersection will remain at a "D" or better due to the small increase in volume. VDOT will require right turn lane tapers and decel lanes contrary to the report's conclusions. VDOT reviewed the proposal and its limited impact on the existing traffic volumes and projected levels of service. VDOT did not find a reasonable way for the developer to improve the intersection level of service above a Level "D". Thus, VDOT will remain neutral on the recommendation of this proposal and leave the decision of approval to the Board of Supervisors. Fire Marshal: Extension of municipal water supplies for firefighting are recommended for this site. As a bank, there does not appear to be a significant impact on fire department response. Plan approval recommended. Department of Inspections: Asbestos inspection and demolition permit required to remove existing structure. No additional comments required at this time. Shall comment at the time of site plan review. Public Works Department: Refer to impact analysis F. Drainage: The actual magnitude of the site drainage will dictate the need for onsite stormwater management. Because of the relative size of the site, stormwater detention may be limited to underground piping. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: No comment. Sanitation Authority: No comment. Frederick -Winchester Health Dept.: No objection as long as public water and sewer is provided and no existing wells or septic systems are impacted. Historic Resources Advisory Board: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic properties and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify any core battlefields that this proposed rezoning would directly impact. These properties are within the study area of the Second Battle of Winchester; however, it is in an area of lost integrity. 0 N. Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 3 Department of Parks & Recreation: No comment. Winchester Regional Airport: Allowed uses under this rezoning should not effect airside operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Frederick County Public Schools: Based on the information provided that states no residential units will be part of the rezoning, there will be no impact to the school population upon build -out. Attorney Comment: It is my opinion that the Proposed Proffer Statement is in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and is legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following: 1. The Rezoning Number should be inserted at the beginning of the Proposed Proffer Statement. 2. The second sentence of the second paragraph, which reads "The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein", should be deleted. The timing of the respective proffers in the Proposed Proffer Statement should be set forth in the individual proffer item. 3. In Proffer No. 2.2, the time of the installation of the landscaped corridor buffer should be set forth, perhaps providing that the installation occur prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, or at such earlier time as staff determines to be appropriate. Also, this proffer should provide for County staff approval of the landscape design, unless staff feels that existing zoning ordinance landscaping regulation are sufficient to control the design. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific site, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. Staff Note: The revised proffer statement (dated May 2, 2005) addresses the attorney's comments. Plannin1l & ZoninjZ: 1) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) identifies this property as being zoned A-2 (Agriculture General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1] Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 4 Land Use The parcels comprising this rezoning application are located within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA), but outside the Urban Development Area (UDA). The site also falls within Phase One of the Round Hill Community Land Use Plan. The proposed use (bank/office) is generally in conformance with that plan. The Round Hill Plan does not recommend rezoning land within the community for commercial development prior to the provision of central water and sewer. The extension of public sewer and water will therefore be required before the issuance of building permits for this site, as per the comments from the Health Department. The Round Hill Plan calls for standards to minimize the visual disruption to the Route 50 corridor. The Plan calls for shared entrances, green space along Route 50, screening of structures and parking areas, control of the size, number and location of signs, requiring underground utilities and minimum standards for landscaping. Discreet signage with a maximum 10% of fagade area is specifically recommended. The objective is to prevent the creation of a typical commercial strip along this route. Staff note: The revised proffer statement (dated May 2, 2005) proffers landscaping along Route 50 consistent with a Corridor Buffer Illustrative Exhibit, with details to be defined on the future site plan. The revised proffer statement proffers freestanding signage limited to one monument style sign not to exceed 20 feet in height, with a size not to exceed 75 square feet in area, excluding the supporting structure. Staff notes that the sign conditioned with the 7-Eleven across the street is 50 square feet. Transportation The Round Hill Community Land Use Plan calls for a transportation network that would feed traffic to and from Route 50 at controlled intersections, and discourages a proliferation of entrances along Route 50 itself. The Round Hill Plan states that commercial establishments should front feeder roads which connect to Route 50 at signalized intersections. This discourages individual business entrances on Route 50 both for aesthetic reasons as well as transportation efficiency. The proposed right in only entrance on Route 50 is therefore contrary to the Round Hill Plan. An interparcel connector with the adjacent Funkhouser/Poe properties would allow for a joint entrance further west on the Funkhouser/Poe property, where it would likely be possible to achieve a right in and right out access point for a number of adjacent, inter- connected parcels. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Route 50 as a short-term designated route. As a ten foot linear trail is planned on the north side of Route 50, it might be more appropriate to provide a sidewalk on the south side of Route 50. 3) Site Suitability/Environment The site does not contain any enviromnental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. In particular, there are no identified areas of steep slopes, floodplain or Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 5 wetlands/hydrologic soils on the parcels identified in this application. The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Vir inia indicates that the soils comprising the subj ect parcel fall under the Frederick-Poplimento-Oaklet soil association. The predominant soil type on the site is Carbo-Oaklet silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes (map symbol 6C). This soil type is not considered prime farmland. The characteristics of this soil type and any implications for site development are manageable through the site engineering process. 4) Potential Impacts A. Transportation A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for this application using composite data collected from other studies in the area as well as actual traffic counts. Using traffic generation figures from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, 7"' Edition, the TIA projects that the proposed development will produce 1,716 average daily trips (ADT). The TIA projects peak hour Level of Service "D" conditions for certain movements at the intersection of Ward Avenue and Northwestern Pike (Route 50) at project build out. As demonstrated by the TIA, such conditions are expected due to background traffic growth along the corridor, and will be experienced regardless of the introduction of bank -generated trips. The TIA also analyzed the need for turn -lane treatments at the proposed intersection of Route 50/Ward Avenue and Route 50/ Driveway #1. The TIA indicated that a full width right -turn lane would not be required for the intersection of Route 50/Ward Avenue and Route 50/ Site - Driveway #1. VDOT disagrees with this conclusion and will require right turn lane tapers and deceleration lanes. Staff note: The applicant has not proffered right turn taper lanes and deceleration lanes as he understands that VDOT will require these at the time of site plan approval. B. Sewer and Water A 20' regional water transmission line is scheduled to cross Route 50 and follow Ward Avenue south. An eight inch gravity fed sewer main will be extended from the regional pump station located on the Winchester Medical Center West Campus site. Using standard water consumption rate for a bank and general office uses of 200 GPD per 1,000 square feet of floor area, the proposed use of the site will consume approximately 1,600 GPD of water and produce equivalent sewer flows. The Sanitation Authority and Service Authority has offered "no comment" for this rezoning. C. Community Facilities The Frederick County Fiscal Impact Model is a tool that is used to identify the capital costs associated with various types of development proposals presented to the County. The projected costs to Fire and Rescue, Public Schools, Parks and Recreation, Library, Sheriff's Office and for the Administration Building are calculated and provided to the applicant for their consideration. The Fiscal Impact Model output for this project indicates a net positive fiscal impact at the build out of the project. However, in recognition of the impacts that may be realized by the community to the Fire and Rescue services and Sheriffs office, the applicant has proffered a 0 0 Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 6 contribution in the amount of $2,000 to Frederick County for Fire and Rescue purposes and $2,000 to Frederick County for Sheriff's office purposes. The timing of this contribution is dependant upon future site development activity. 5) Proffer Statement (May 2, 2005) A) Generalized Development Plan The applicant has proffered a Generalized Development Plan (GDP dated May 2, 2005) for the site. The GDP shows a right -in only entrance on Route 50, a full entrance on Ward Avenue aligned with the Ward Avenue entrance to the 7-Eleven, and a ten foot landscaped corridor buffer along Route 50. B) Land Use The applicant has proffered to develop the site only for a bank or a general office. All other uses permitted in the B2 Zoning District would be prohibited on the property. The applicant has also proffered that the gross floor area of the bank and general office shall not exceed 8,000 square feet. (Staff Note: While the proffered maximum square footage is 8, 000 square feet, the applicant will still be required to meet all criteria in the Zoning Ordinance and may not be able to accommodate an 8, 000 square foot building. The application also notes that the design of the bank will include multiple drive through lanes. Any drive—in lanes will be required to meet the requirements set out in the Zoning Ordinance.) C) Site Development The applicant has proffered to limit site entrances to two as shown on the GDP. Direct access from Route 50 shall be limited to a right in only entrance. The applicant has proffered a ten foot landscaped corridor buffer along the Route 50 frontage which will include mixed ornamental plantings generally consistent with the exhibit entitled Corridor Buffer Illustrative Exhibit, dated May 2, 2005. (Staff Note: This proffer does not take the place of any ordinance requirements for landscaping. This proffer should be viewed as an enhancement of the required landscaping, not a substitute for the required landscaping.) The applicant has proffered to limit freestanding signage on the property to one monument style sign not to exceed 20 feet in height. The sign area shall not exceed 75 square feet in area, excluding the supporting structure. D) Monetary Contribution The applicant has proffered a monetary contribution in the amount of $2,000 to Frederick County for Fire and Rescue purposes and $2,000 to Frederick County for Sheriff's Office purposes. Both of the above contributions shall be made at the time of issuance of the first commercial building permit for the site. 0 0 Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 7 STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 04/20/05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The proffered use of the Marathon Bank site is generally consistent with the goals of the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. Elements of the rezoning application have been identified that should be carefully evaluated to ensure that they fully address specific components of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular the Round Hill Community Land Use Plan. Particular attention should be paid to the proposed access on Route 50 and the corridor appearance standards for enhanced landscaping and reduced signage as set out in the Round Hill Plan. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF THE 04/20/05 MEETING: Mr. Charles W. Maddox, representing the applicant, spoke on the right -in only entrance along Rt. 50 and the need to make this a viable bank site. He suggested that the right -in turn would help to ease traffic flow by moving traffic off of Rt. 50 Eastbound and into the site, instead of proceeding through to the traffic signal, adding to congestion at the light. Addressing the corridor appearance standards, the applicant stated that the landscaped buffer will be fully -detailed on the GDP, prior to the Board of Supervisors' consideration, with flowering shrubs, approximately three to three -and -a -half feet high, to provide a ground screen for the parking area. Trees along the Rt. 50 corridor were not proposed by the applicant due to possible sight -distance issues by VDOT. However, flowering and deciduous trees were envisioned by the applicant in the median islands of the parking lot and along the edges of the parking lot. The applicant also agreed to modify the proffer to limit the size of the monument -style sign to 20 feet in height. The applicant also discussed their commitment to construct the continuous right -turn lane along the front of the property, culminating into a full right turn onto Ward Avenue. Regarding the staff s recommendation for an inter -parcel connector with the property to the west, the applicant was agreeable to possibly using a portion of the 25-foot inactive buffer at the rear of the property, should the adjoining property owner desire to have that connection. The Chairman and C.E.O. of Marathon Bank was available to answer questions from the Commission. He provided an artist's rendering of the brick structure which was a prototype they have previously built. Their analysis had concluded that this same footprint could be placed on this site. There were no public comments. Although the Commission supported the recommendations within the Round Hill LUP, they were sympathetic to the Bank's request for a right -in only entrance with the deceleration lane on Rt. 50 for this site. It was pointed out that prior to this proposal, three residential driveways accessed Rt. 50 at this location. Questions were also raised by Commissioners on signage and street trees. The Planning Commission believed this was an appropriate use for this particular parcel and they unanimously recommended approval. (Commissioners Watt, Wilmot Light, Ours, and Morris were absent from the meeting.) • 0 Rezoning #05-05 — Marathon Bank May 4, 2005 Page 8 STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 05/11/05 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The proffered use of the Marathon Bank site is generally consistent with the goals of the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. Elements of the rezoning application have been identified that should be carefully evaluated to ensure that they fully address specific components of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular the Round Hill Community Land Use Plan. Particular attention should be paid to the proposed entrance on Route 50. Following the required public hearing, a decision regarding this rezoning application by the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Board of Supervisors. B2 COMMONWEAL A Al \ HGROUP."CHESTER COMMONwEA(T H GROUP. H,7NCNFSTER Q Q �Q of N¢ 'gym mP G3 S= 2 Q Q 'r R P 0 V P hm CQ QpW ham, P & 5 P QQ 0ti QS h� yW� QP 2r� ypJLi 4 J? 4 JOHNSON3:,V53 NANCYS RENNER ✓OR\gNCyRENNfR I 53 A 76 JOHNSON,ROBERTB. / / Q = r • h = mm m� m , n O W � Ir 2 W f • 1317 I HO�CIDAY �� J 24 h'NK& JUNES I • PHFH 538 3 15 PROPERFIEf, lLC 53 wOlF0R0, UY►Y.,?'aRM1Tl{q• • WOCF0=B.4RMIrHA ; Map Features /,/ &open O Varzels r PPI—bon ^�cwena Lakesif'oMs ^� Dams Ap'lcul-11 a Forestal Dlse — sn.— Steams �� Reb�nirg Wails - Badda,ps Road Centerlines - I—bf. Cf.'. a Relupe Ch.'� Tanks N South Frederick s 1 1 / 1 • 1 1 • 53 A 68 a INCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC 1 I 0 FARMERS try 538 3 1` ESTOCK EXCHANGE, INC CO 8 3 11 MS,NANCY( B2 REZ # 05 - 05 Marathon Bank ( 53B - 3 - 5,6,7,8 ) 0 75 150 300 Feet �7 Nuw "b''1• rl T E. Yfr y,� Qo. f .r r !a ti �Qp ?S - J 'Alp 1317 3 co IN • f N 6 JUNE ZS S fgRrn� M S o�H pP`t S 7ES, ELC Eg q a ARM�ry� •:. COMBS NANCYI � � OV 4MI� Map Features /v W-1g.. O P.ruk Appl—W, n/ cun.n. lek,$JPIr DO— AgAllhural a F.—b-I Dl-1- ^� R.b" W.ft - DouM. Chu,cn w— S-- N e,k ;rps Road Centerlines - R.k, Ch .h ® T.nb N O south ireae,id REZ # 05 - 05 Marathon Bank ( 53B - 3 - 5,6,7,8 ) 0 75 150 300 Feet 0 • REZONING APPLICATION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 30 i To be completed by Planning Staff ��� Fee Amount Paid f Zoning Amendment Number S Date Received�— PC Hearing Date 6 b BOS Hearing Date S o 5 The following information shall be provided by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) Telephone: 540-667-2139 Address: 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 2. Property Owner (if different than above) Name: The Marathon Bank Address: P.O. Box 998 Stephens City, Virginia 3. Contact person if other than above Telephone: 540-869-6600 Name: Charles E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP (PHR+A) Telephone: 540-667-2139 4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location Map X Agency Comments X Plat X Fees X Deed of property X Impact Analysis Statement X Verification of taxes paid X Proffer Statement X 0 • S. The Code of VirLyinia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: The Marathon Bank 6. A) Current Use of the Property: B) Proposed Use of the Property: 7. Adjoining Property: See Attached PARCEL ID NUMBER 53B-((3))-1 53B-((3))-24 53-((A))-82 53-((A))-76 53-((A))-68 Single Family Residence; Restaurant (Kathy's Tortuga) Bank and General Office USE Commercial (7-11) Residential Unimproved Residential Unimproved (WMC West) ZONING RA (Rural Areas) RA (Rural Areas) RA (Rural Areas) RA (Rural Areas) B2/1\4S (Bus. Gen./Med. Support) 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers). The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. 0 • Adjoining Property Owners Rezoning Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Plamiing Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2" d floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Address Property Identification Number (PIN) Name: Winchester Medical Center, Inc. P.O. Box 1334 Property #: 53-A-68 Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Darla P. Funkhouser & Sharon S. Poe 272 Hilda Drive Property #: 53-A-82 Clearbrook, VA 22624 Name: Farmers Livestock Exchange, Inc. P.O. Box 2696 Property #: 5313-3-1 Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Robert B. Johnson 2054 Northwestern Pike Property #: 53-A-76 Winchester, VA 22603 Name: John K. & June S. Holliday I I I Ashton Drive Property #: 5313-3-24 Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: Name: Property #: 67 MARATHON — ROUTE 50 WEST Information to be Submitted for Capital Facilities Impact Model In order for the Planning Staff to use its capital facilities impact model, it is necessary for the applicant to provide information concerning the specifics of the proposed use. Otherwise, the planning staff will use the maximum possible density of intensity scenario for the proposed Zoning District as described on page 9 of the application package. 9. Parcel Identification/Location: Parcel Identification Number: 53B-((3))-5, 6, 7 & 8 Magisterial: Fire Service: Rescue Service: Back Creek Round Hill Round Hill Districts High School: Middle School: Elementary School: James Wood Frederick County Apple Pie Ridge 10. Zoning Change: List the acreage included in each new zoning category being requested. Acres Current Zoning Zoning Requested 1.00 RA B2 1.00 Total acreage to be rezoned 11. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed: Number of Units Proposed Single Family Home 0 Townhome 0 Multi -Family 0 Non -Residential Lots 0 Mobile Horne 0 Hotel Rooms 0 Square Footage of Proposed Uses Office 8,000 Service Station Retail 0 Manufacturing Restaurant 0 Warehouse Other 3 E is 12. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter- the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and the Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s) Date 3/21/05 Charles E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Senior VP Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pe i Owner(s) Date 3/21/05 Donald L. Unger, President and CEO The Marathon Bank 4 0 • 2 g � Special Limited Power of Attorney UR County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Name) The Marathon Bank (Phone) 540-869-6600 (Address) P.O. Box 998, Stephens City, Virginia 22655 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument Number(s) 040018770, 040001588 and is (are) described as Parcels: 5,6,7,8 Lot: Block: 3 Section/Tax Map 53B Subdivision: Ward Avenue Lots do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc. (Phone) 540-667-2139 (Address) 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To act as my true and lawful attomey-in-fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including X Rezoning (including proffers) _ Conditional Use Permits X Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) _ Subdivision X Site Plan My attomey-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I (wA have hereto set my (our) hand and seal this cdday of March , 2005, Signature(s L' c State of Virginia Ci Coun of _cic i c?��-� P�►r' To -wit: I, Co nr I MQ f-)o cc IC a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument personally appeared before me and has acknowledged the same before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this 2;,s01 day of March , 2005. `-'(Y aat v4�-�"Ylnn2.f!]if)) My Commission Expires:T �j 0'j 200 Notary Public BK939PG0602 NOTES: I. BOUNDARY SHOWN HEREON WAS DETERMINED BY A FIELD RUN SURVEY PERFORMED BY HAWKINS k ASSOCIATES ON APRIL 14. 1999. A=102.43' 2. THIS PLAT IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. R-2976.79' 3. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. 4. OTHER RIGHTS -OF -WAYS OR EASEYEMS. IF ANY, ARE NOT SHOWN. B=N &r44'21' W C=102,42' POINT �6u �D5V1) POINT EM (4..02') FOUND Ili LOr a I - LO'r -7 RF13AR SEA C 7Rif.•Sti < t- o LO'r 2.4 TALL !RM P6'E FOUND N 1744'24' E 2.00' \ I I 21,�40 i TM 15M-3-5,6 BUCHER W9 109 PC 1377 L 9r 6 1 LOT 5 E WR SET S 7C REBAR N 7Q FOUND TIA +538-3-24 HOIIJDAY DB 546 PC 637 1-¢ir 25 POUWMY WNW AaJU5fW-W OF LOT 5, LOT 6, AN4? L.Or 24 cf WAW A`,FNLV L-Of5 PROPQiTY LINE HERBY VACATED S 19'44'26' 4V 5'3� E i00.00' PK` �NAIL / 2.00' J J4 W 100.00 - PK NAIL n FOUND N u7 M B20N PIPE `� FOUND N BACK GMEK ►715MCf Mt K-VX COt.I," VVaN A 5CAl-t: I" - 40' t7A1E: AF'iZ9.- 14, 1999 ?All # 5-W-�-5,6 C W-t- N ®1 a-M & t7irN"5m mi BUQ-I R " 109 F7C4 15 77 LOT 5i,6 TM * 5-W--5-24 JC N K. HOLLVAY PROJECT 1995065 PV 5-16 P6 6!�l7 LOT 24 t �~ MICHAEL f,9. A.9TP ' t [vo. 1 SS Hawkins DM4 Associates tmo>oaiiiiiiiiI un ew.a. ma 35 •. 9DXA RII 47Rm YA 22001-4760 in 510-W-3213 FAR 540-667-9iea Toll rasa-E06-7:h-73N 4-4 �{ DATE O Q RECEIVED FROM W r. DDRFSS PO �X a 4 1 � W t/Yt o N co co N FOR r > ,�" Q FOR O Q '� kr N col U cd O'<n AMT. OF ACCOUNT CASH AMT. PAID CHECK BALANCE DUE MONEY I ORDER I.D. NO. 54-0928-137 PHONE 1-540-667-3752 Comtroctioo Camp•n7, Inc P.O. BOX 2468 E X C A V A T I N G WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604 C O M M E R C I A L R E S I D E N T I A L PAY *FOUR THOUSAND AND XX / 100 i i TO THE ORDER OF �f II I TREASURER OF FREDERICK COUNTY P.O. BOX 220 No. 9073 DOLLARS $ BRANCH BANKING a TRUST COMPANY 009902 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 68-426-514 09902 1 E S WINCHESTER, VA 22604 4w4z*--l/ 11.0000990 2119 1:0 S L404 2601:000 S 2 3 S SO 28 3811■ DATE CHECK AMOUNT 01/25/2008 *****4,000.00* • ,lr. • 3�C; Action: AMENDMENT PLANNING COMMISSION: April 20, 2005 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: May 11, 2005 0 APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING 905-05 FOR MARATHON BANK WHEREAS, Rezoning #05-05 for Marathon Bank, was submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC, to rezone 1.0 acre from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (General Business) District. The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (Route 50 W), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 Interchange, in the Back Creek Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers (PINs) 53B-3-5, 5313-3-6, 53B-3-7, and 53B-3-8. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on April 20, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on May 11, 2005; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 1.0 acre from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (General Business) District, as described by the application and plat submitted, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRes. # 19-05 0 • This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 1 lth day of May, 2005 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Barbara E. Van Osten Ave Gina A. Forrester Aye Gary Dove Aye Lynda J. Tyler Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye A COPY ATTEST John R. (Rile Jr. Frederick County Administrator PDRes. # 19-05 • I � U PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 05-05 Rural Areas (RA) to Business General (B2) PROPERTY: 1.0 acre +/-; Tax Map Parcels 53B-3-5, 6,7 & 8 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER: The Marathon Bank APPLICANT- The Marathon Bank PROJECT NAME: Marathon Bank — Route 50 West ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 21, 2005 REVISION DATE (S): May 2, 2005 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning maybe contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Marathon Bank - US Route 50" dated March 23, 2005 [revised May 2, 2005] (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: 1. Land Use 1.1 The Property shall be developed with bank and general office land uses. All other uses permitted in the B2 Zoning District shall be prohibited on the Property. 1.2 The gross floor area of bank and general office land uses shall not exceed 8,000 square feet. 2. Site Development 2.1 Site entrances shall be limited to two as shown on the Generalized Development Plan (GDP). Direct access to the Property from Route 50 (Northwestern Pike) shall E Proffer Statement • Marathon Bank — Route 50 West be limited to a right in only entrance, the exact design and location of which shall be determined upon final engineering thereof pursuant to the specifications and approval of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). (See 1 on GDP) 2.2 A 10-foot wide landscaped corridor buffer shall be provided along the Route 50 frontage of the site, which shall be fully installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the Property (See 2 on GDP). Landscaping within said buffer shall consist of mixed ornamental plantings generally consistent with the exhibit entitled Corridor Buffer Illustrative Exhibit, dated May 2, 2005. The precise composition of buffer area landscaping shall be defined on the site plan for the Property. 2.3 Freestanding signage on the Property shall be limited to one monument style sign not to exceed 20 feet in height. The size of said sign shall not exceed 75 square feet in area, excluding the supporting structure. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) to Frederick County for fire and rescue purposes. Said contribution shall be made at the time of issuance of the first commercial building permit for the site. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) to Frederick County for Sheriff's Office purposes. Said contribution shall be made at the time of issuance of the first commercial building permit for the site. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 2 of 3 Rev. 5/02/05 9 U Proffer Statement Respectfully submitted, THE MARATHON BANK By: EO. Date: S OJ STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: Marathon Bank — Route 50 West The fore ping instrume t was acknowledged before me this �� day of, 2005, by _6191nazzz My commission e ires a— a 9-0 k Notary Public 0 Gi� �o . 1_i2,z� Page 3 of 3 Rev. 5/02/05 • OUTPUT MODULE APPLICANT: Marathon Bank - Route 50 Net Fiscal Impact LAND USE TYPE B2 Office Costs of Impact Credit: Credits to be Taken for Future Taxes Paid (NPV) Total Potential Adjustment For REAL EST VAL $800,000 Required (entered in Cur. Budget Cur. Budget Cap. Future CIP/ Tax Credits Revenue- Net Capital Net Cost Per FIRE & RESCUE = 9 Capital Faciltiies col sum only) Oper Cap Equip Expend/Debt S. Taxes. Other (Unadjusted) Cost Balance Facilities Impact Dwelling Unit Fire and Rescue Department $2,664 $0 $0 $2,664 #DIV/01 Elementary Schools $0 ---- ---- Middle Schools $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/01 High Schools $0 ---- ---- Parks and Recreation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/01 Public Library $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/0! Sheriffs Offices $0 $499 $0 $0 $499 $499 $0 #DIV/01 Administration Building $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/01 Other Miscellaneous Facilities $0 $1,195 $1,320 $2,515 $2,515 $0 #DIV/01 SUBTOTAL $2,664 $1,694 $1,320 $0 $3,014 $3,014 $0 #DIV/01 LESS: NET FISCAL IMPACT $149,047 $149,047 $149,047 ($149,047) #DIV/0! NET CAP. FACILITIES IMPACT $01 #DIV/0! INDEX: "1.0" If Cap. Equip Included 1.0 INDEX: "1.0" if Rev -Cost Bal, "0.0" if Ratio to Co Avg: 0.0 Rev -Cost Bal = 1.000 PLANNING DEPT PREFERENCES 1.0 1.0 Ratio to Co Avg ---------------------- 1.342 ----------------------- -------------------- ---------------------------------------------- METHODOLOGY: 1. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- Capital facilities requirements are input to the first column as calculated in the model. --------------------- 2. Net Fiscal Impact NPV from operations calculations is Input in row total of second column (zero if negative); included are the one-time taxes/fees for one year only at full value. 3. NPV of future oper cap equip taxes paid in third column as calculated in fiscal impacts. 4. NPV of future capital expenditure taxes paid in fourth col as calculated in fiscal impacts. 5. NPV of future taxes paid to bring current county up to standard for new facilities, as calculated for each new facility. 6. Columns three through five are added as potential credits against the calculated capital facilities requirements. These are adjusted for percent of costs covered by the revenues from the project (actual, or as ratio to avg. for all residential development). NOTE: Proffer calculations do not include include interest because they are cash payments up front. Credits do include interest if the projects are debt financed. NOTES: Model Run Date 3/21/05 SKE Project Description: Assumes maximum of 8,000 square feet of office use on 1.0 acres zoned B2 District Due to changing conditions associated with development in the County, the results of this Output Module may not be valid beyond a period of 90 days from the model run date. • 0 ROBERT B..mason N a es�e. 4vo�M Zoned:RA J�" J Um Redd I /it 1 R -----•--------- — -- — �- GMT --IN (TRANCE ONLY O \ \ 53—A-82 Funkhouser & Poe / Use: Vacant NZ �7All V I I I I 1 \ 1 \ � tE-- AL1 ON \ BY OTTH RS _ \ y z7I /F I 1 I #2051 I / CONVENIENC ORE L ,f2 61 j' J I 538-3-1 � I FARMER'S I LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE ` CANOPY Zoned: RA L— Use: Convenience Store PROPOM O / / l 18"/GENERAL OWICE FULL / 8.000 SF MAX EN CEGo CO ,m , `COz / m I -� 538-3-24 John June Holliday Q / Zoned: RA a Use: Vacant c,,, MA RA THON BANK cn Patton, Harris, Rust &Associates, pc US ROUTE 50 (14 �' GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN 11 fREDER/CK COUNTY, WG/N14 KMCE: (540) 667-21 ('540) M-0423 l J CORRIDOR BUFFER ILLUSTRATIVE EXHIBIT May 2, 2005 14 \ 53—A-82J unkhouser & Poe Use: Vacant Vacant % I i i 10' LANDS CORRIDOR � v/ j�lF -1_4 r i - 7 1 #2051 ; f #2 - L ` I n ( i r m r \ m --_ 53B-3-24 John --& June Holliday — Zoned: RA IIeP• Vnrnnt V I %J I I IL * Specific composition and quantities to be determined at Site Plan Stage with staff input. PPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc HEngineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. • 7 PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ # 05-05 Rural Areas (RA) to Business General (B2) PROPERTY: 1.0 acre +/-; Tax Map Parcels 53B-3-5, 6,7 & 8 (the "Property") RECORD OWNER The Marathon Bank APPLICANT: The Marathon Bank PROJECT NAME: Marathon Bank - Route 50 West ORIGINAL DATE OF PROFFERS: March 21, 2005 REVISION DATE (S): May 2, 2005 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced B2 conditional rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of County Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning maybe contested in the appropriate court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development plans until such contest is resolved, the term rezoning shall include the day following entry of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the "Generalized Development Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Generalized Development Plan, Marathon Bank - US Route 50" dated March 23, 2005 [revised May 2, 2005] (the "GDP"), and shall include the following: Land Use 1.1 The Property shall be developed with bank and general office land uses. All other uses permitted in the B2 Zoning District shall be prohibited on the Property. 1.2 The gross floor area of bank and general office land uses shall not exceed 8,000 square feet. 2. Site Development 2.1 Site entrances shall be limited to two as shown on the Generalized Development Plan (GDP). Direct access to the Property from Route 50 (Northwestern Pike) shall • Proffer Statement • Marathon Bank — Route 50 West be limited to a right in only entrance, the exact design and location of which shall be determined upon final engineering thereof pursuant to the specifications and approval of the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). (See 1 on GDP) 2.2 A 10-foot wide landscaped corridor buffer shall be provided along the Route 50 frontage of the site, which shall be fully installed prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the Property (See 2 on GDP). Landscaping within said buffer shall consist of mixed ornamental plantings generally consistent with the exhibit entitled Corridor Buffer Illustrative Exhibit, dated May 2, 2005. The precise composition of buffer area landscaping shall be defined on the site plan for the Property. 2.3 Freestanding signage on the Property shall be limited to one monument style sign not to exceed 20 feet in height. The size of said sign shall not exceed 75 square feet in area, excluding the supporting structure. 3. Monetary Contribution to Offset Impact of Development 3.1 The Applicant shall contribute the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) to Frederick County for fire and rescue purposes. Said contribution shall be made at the time of issuance of the first commercial building permit for the site. 3.2 The Applicant shall contribute the amount of two thousand dollars ($2,000.00) to Frederick County for Sheriff's Office purposes. Said contribution shall be made at the time of issuance of the first commercial building permit for the site. SIGNATURES APPEAR ON THE FOLLOWING PAGES Page 2 of 3 Rev. 5/02/05 • Proffer Statement n LJ Marathon Bank —Route 50 West Respectfully submitted, THE MARATHON BANK By: Date: S d I STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE FREDERICK COUNTY, To -wit: The foregoing instrume t was acknowledged before me this �� `t day of J , 2005, by na�l��� My commission e pires oZ — a 9-0 41 Notary Public /fti(j o 22 r44�--� Page 3 of 3 Rev. 5/02/05 OUTPUT MODULE APPLICANT: Marathon Bank - Route 50 Net Fiscal Impact LAND USE TYPE B2 Office Costs of Impact Credit: Credits to be Taken for Future Taxes Paid (NPV) Total Potential Adjustment For REAL EST VAL $800,000 Required (entered in Cur. Budget Cur. Budget Cap. Future CIP/ S. Taxes. Other Tax Credits (Unadjusted) Revenue- Cost Balance Net Capital Net Cost Per Facilities Impact Dwelling Unit FIRE & RESCUE = 9 Capital Faciitiies col sum only) Oper Cap Equip Expend/Debt Fire and Rescue Department $2,664 $0 $0 $2,664 #DIV/01 Elementary Schools $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/01 Middle Schools $0 High Schools $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/0! Parks and Recreation $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/0! Public Library $0 $0 $499 $0 $0 $499 $499 $0 #DIV/01 Sheriffs Offices $0 $0 $0 $0 #DIV/01 Administration Building Other Miscellaneous Facilities $0 $0 $1,195 $1,320 $2,515 $2,515 $0 #DIV/01 SUBTOTAL $2,664 $1,694 $1,320 $0 $3,014 $149,047 $3,014 $149,047 $0 #DIV/0I ($149,047) #DIV/0! LESS: NET FISCAL IMPACT $149,047 $0 #DIV/01 NET CAP. FACILITIES IMPACT INDEX: "1.0" If Cap. Equip Included 1.0 INDEX: "1.0" if Rev -Cost Bal, "0.0" if Ratio to Co Avg: 0.0 Rev -Cost Bal = 1.000 PLANNING DEPT PREFERENCES 1.0 1.0 ----------------------- Ratio to Co Avg --------------------- 1.342 ----------- -------------------------------------------- METHODOLOGY: 1. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Capital facilities requirements are input to the first column as calculated in the model. 2. Net Fiscal Impact NPV from operations calculations is input in row total of second column (zero if negative); included are the one-time taxes/fees for one year only at full value. 3. NPV of future oper cap equip taxes paid in third column as calculated in fiscal impacts. 4. NPV of future capital expenditure taxes paid in fourth col as calculated in fiscal impacts. 5. NPV of future taxes paid to bring current county up to standard for new facilities, as calculated for each new facility. 6. Columns three through five are added as potential credits against the calculated capital facilities requirements. These are adjusted for percent of costs covered by the revenues from the project (actual, or as ratio to avg. for all residential development). NOTE: Proffer calculations do not include include interest because they are cash payments up front. Credits do include interest if the projects -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------- are debt financed. --------------------- ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- NOTES: Model Run Date ------------------------- 3/21/05 SKE Project Description: Assumes maximum of 8,000 square feet of office use on 1.0 acres zoned B2 District Due to changing conditions associated with development in the County, the results of this Output Module may not be valid beyond a period of 90 days from the model run date. 11 0 • \ \ 53-A-82' Funkhouser & Poe I Use: Vacant N _ N i � O I ~ 10' LAND CORRIDOR ROBERT B. ANNSON T.M.))-78 J�" D.B. 586, PG. 878Zoned'.d, RA RA � Use. Reid ------------------' L �. i N �- RIGHT—IN ENTRANCE ONLY O � I #2051 I L #2 61 I PROPOSED l BANK/GENERAL OFFICE / 8,000 SF MAX Co r m �\ m 538-3-24 Joh -- June Holliday Zoned: RA Use: Vacant i � O _. FULL BY OT}4 S \ y i JJJJj �� lI CONVENIENC <ORE 53B-3-1 FARMER'S LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE ` CA "'Op Zoned: RA Use: Convenience Store 11-4 ti \� M US ROUTE 50 Patton, Harris, Rust &Associates, pc 11 \ y' GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN O O CD 117 E Picodily St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 61 fWDERICK COUNTY, WRGIN14 K)ICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX (540) 665-0493 CORRIDOR BUFFER ILLUSTRATIVE EXHIBIT May 2, 2005 10' LANDSC PED CORRIDOR B I FFEf 53—A-82 #2 unkhouser & Poe Use: Vocont W j CO ^� u7 538-3-24 John &June Hollidoy Zoned: RA `\ Ilco• Vnrnnt * Specific composition and quantities to be determined at Site Plan Stage with staff input. PPatton Harris Rust & Associates, pc uEngineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 9 • Marathon Bank —Route 50 West Rezoning PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT HALL, 4RNAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN &MITCHELL I WILBUR C. HALL (1892-1972) THOMAS V. MONAHAN (1924-1999) SAMUEL D. ENGLE O. LELAND MAHAN ROBERT T. MITCHELL, JR. JAMES A. KLENKAR STEVEN IF JACKSON DENNIS J. MCLOUGHLIN, JR. HAND -DELIVERED A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS ATTORNEYS AT LAW a 7 EAST MARKET STREET 9 EAST BOSCAWEN STREET LEESBURG, VIRGINIA WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA TELEPHONE 703-777-1050 TELEPHONE 540-662-3200 FAX 540-662-4304 E-MAIL lawyers@hallmonahan.com April 4, 2005 Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Director Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 PLEASE REPLY TO'. P. 0. BOX 848 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604-0848 Re: Marathon Bank (Marathon Bank - Route 50 West) Proposed Proffer Statement Dear Mike: I have reviewed the above -referenced Proposed Proffer Statement. It is my opinion that the Proposed Proffer Statement is in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, and is legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following: 1. The Rezoning Number should be inserted at the beginning of the Proposed Proffer Statement. 2. The second sentence of the second paragraph, which reads "The improvements proffered herein shall be provided at the time of development of that portion of the Property adjacent to or including the improvement or other proffered requirement, unless otherwise specified herein", should be deleted. The timing of the respective proffers in this Proposed Proffer Statement should be set forth in the individual proffer item. HALL, ONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL Michael T. Ruddy, AICP April 4, 2005 Page 2 3. In Proffer No. 2.2, the time of the installation of the landscaped corridor buffer should be set forth, perhaps providing that the installation occur prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit, or at such earlier time as the staff determines to be appropriate. Also, this proffer should provide for County staff approval of the landscaping design, unless staff feels that existing zoning ordinance landscaping regulations are sufficient to control the design. I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for this specific site, as it is my understanding that that review will be done by the staff and the Planning Commission. If there are any questions concerning the foregoing, please contact me. ery tiiTty, yours, Robert T. Mitchell./Jr. RTM/ks Marathon Bank - TIA Review (Rol*0 and Ward Avenue, Frederick Count Page 1 of 1 Christopher M. Mohn '7rom: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Ingram, Lloyd ([Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 1:56 PM To: 'christopher.mohn@phra.com' Cc: Ingram, Lloyd; Eric Lawrence (E-mail) Subject: Marathon Bank - TIA Review (Route 50 and Ward Avenue, Frederick County) The Edinburg Residency has completed the review of the TIA for the Marathon Bank rezoning proposal submitted by PHR & A and offers the following comments: • VDOT agrees that at the proposed build -out, the site will generate approximately 1716 trips per day. This will mean an additional 3% increase on the intersection volumes. • VDOT agrees that the level of service of the Route 50 and Ward Avenue intersection will remain at a "D" or better due to the small increase in volume. • VDOT will require right turn lane tapers and decel lanes contrary to the reports conclusions. VDOT reviewed the proposal and its limited impact on the existing traffic volumes and projected levels of service. VDOT did not find a reasonable way for the developer to improve the intersection level of service above a Level "D". Thus, VDOT will remain neutral on the recommendation of this proposal and leave the decision of approval to the Board of Supervisors. ? ' -1d A. Ingram �sportation Engineer VDOT — Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) 3/17/2005 • C� 2 5 2005 ,, MAR . Rezoning Comments MARATHON ROUTE 50 REZONING Mail to: Frederick Co. Fire Marshal 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-6350 Frederick County Fire Marshal Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Fire & Rescue Dept. Attn: Fire Marshal Co. Administration Bldg., I" Floor 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Fire Marshal with his review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540)667-2139 Mailing Address: c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre Fire Marshal's Comments: Fire Marshal's Signature & Date Notice to Fire Marshal — Please turn This Form to the Applicant 12 11 w x a y � k VIRGINIA Control number RZ04-0017 Project Name Marathon Route 50 Address 117 E. Piccadilly Street Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning B2 Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed Date Revised 11 /12/2004 11 /18/2004 Applicant P. H. R. & A. City State Zip Applicant Phone Winchester VA 22601 540-667-2139 Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District 53B-3-5,6,7,& 8 15 15 Election District Recommendations Back Creek Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System No No Requirements Hydrant Location Fire Lane Required Not Identified No Roadway/Aisleway Width Special Hazards Not Identified No Additional Comments Extension of municipal water supplies for firefighting are recommended for this site. As a bank, there does not appear to be a significant impact on fire department response. Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes Timothy L. Welsh Title PLANS A\PPROVED -- PRE MARSH A5P.n-7 DERICK • is M AR 2 5 2005 Comments THON ROUTE 50 REZONING RECEIVED Frederick County Department of Inspections N(11V 12 Mail to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspections Attn: Director of Inspections 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5650 Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Inspectio C WtRP , & tNSPaJ. Attn: Director of Inspections Co. Administration Bldg., 4`h Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540)667-2139 Mailing Address: c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre Department of Inspections Comments r A_i _ _I , .___ _l . _ n1i �C c S�i w-c .Si�yUc jyy�eS. /1/ D f�c%�ii�ias� a. � Cc9 rh rYl ,eel JS r �b j vea% of �li � s ��.P . s��. �J c h � �a�K� �f �� � %►,e s� S:�Q �lav� Revi��c�.j Inspections Signature & Date: Notice to Dept. — Please Retuq, 'his Form to the Applicant • AR 2 5 2005 Frederick County Department of Public Works Mail to: Frederick Co. Dept. of Public Works Attn: Director of Engineering 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5643 IE NOV 12 2004 Hand deliver to: FREDRCHO Frederick Co. Dept. of Public WorkspUDUC ViORY & Attn: Director of Engineering Co. Administration Bldg., 4ch Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540)667-2139 Mailing Address: c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester. VA 22601 Location of Property: The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre • R 2 5 2005 Rezo m� Comments MARATHON ROUTE 50 REZONING Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 868-1061 Hand deliver to: Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, VA FC8A NOV 15 2004 I j Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Sanitation Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540)667-2139 Mailing Address: c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre Sanitation Authority Comments: Sanitation Authority Signature & Date:-9/V� �✓®ljl Notice to Sanitation Auth ty — Please Return This Form to the Applicant I� • Rezoning Comments MARATHON ROUTE 50 REZONING MAR 2 5 2005 Frederick -Winchester Service Authority Mail to: Fred-Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director P.O. Box 43 Winchester, VA 22604 (540) 722-3579 Hand deliver to: Fred-Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of Public Works with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name Mailing Address Location of Property: Patton Harris Rust & Associates c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Phone: (540)667-2139 The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B-2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre Fred-Winc Service Authority's Comments: !1d CoViftiYv1eVlt' Fred-Winc Service Authority' I FWSA Signature & Date: - �It 118,04 Notice to Fred-Winc Ser ice Authority — Please Return This Form to the Applicant z 10 0eo9 0,-1 i o8 y -F:1, MAR 2 5 V5 Rezoning Comments MARATHON ROUTE 50 REZONING Frederick — Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick -Winchester Health Dept. Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 722-3480 Hand deliver to: Frederick -Winchester Health Dept. Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent St., Suite 201- Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 722-3480 Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist- the Frederick - Winchester Health Department with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Phone: (540)667-2139 Mailing Address: c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Location of Property: The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre Frederick — Winchester Health Department's Comments: c^ -i'c CxS/ 1 -�- c. S iCv(�;c ('a.it o1"uf �'� w• ' i 5 /C VC v' C4 , k/l 1 CAU/ t-N O e X i b TL- t S01, Sf a t i C 4S + S a 1r L.w Health Signature & Date: Notice to Health Department — Please Return This Form to the Applicant 16 U awP 2 5 TO COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 November 23, 2004 Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Marathon Bank — Route 50 West Property Rezoning Proposal Dear Chuck: Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic properties and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. According to the Rural Landmarks Survey, there are no significant historic structures located on the properties nor are there any possible historic districts in the vicinity. It was also noted that the National Park Service Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify any core battlefields that this proposed rezoning would directly impact. These properties are within the study area of the Second Battle of Winchester; however, it is in an area of lost integrity. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Z/?Z�Zw Candice E. Mills Planner II CEM/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 2005 � � BAR 2 b RezoninIZ Comments MARATHON ROUTE 50 REZONING Mail to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 662-2422 Winchester Regional Airport Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, VA Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Winchester Regional Airport with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information. Applicant's Name: Mailing Address Location of Property: Patton Harris Rust & Associates c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Phone: (540)667-2139 The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre Winchester Regional Airport's Comments le A S-'Iq Winchester Regional Airport Signature & Date: �� (�A 1Z l b Notice to Winchester Regional Airport — Please Return This Form to the Applicant 17 • 0 100'� SERVING THE TOP OF VIRGINIA / WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT December 8, 2004 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 Patton Harris Rust & Associates C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22602 Re: Rezoning Comments Marathon Bai * - Route 50 West Propel) ty Back Creek Magisterial District Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Maddox: We have reviewed the referenced rezoning proposal. Allowed uses under this rezoning should not effect airside operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Thank you for providing us the opportunity to review these plans and for supporting the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Serena R. Manuel Executive Director 0 Rezoning Comments MARATHON ROUTE 50 REZONING Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Frederick County Dept. of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Co. Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Applicant's Name: Patton Han -is Rust & Associates, pc Phone: (540) 667-2139 Mailing Address: c/o C. E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Sr. VP 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester. VA 22601 �. Location of Property: The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Current Zoning: RA Zoning Requested: B2 Acreage: 1.0 Acre [Dept. of Parks & Recreation Comments: _ & Recreation ture & Date: / ce to Dept. o /arks & Recreation — Please Return This For to the Applicant u MAR 2 5 20Q5 ��. U'FCPS G F Frederick County Public Schools Administrative Assistant to Visit us at www.frederickk12vaus the Superintendent December 3, 2004 Mr. C.E. Maddox, Jr., P.E. Senior Vice President Patton Harris Rust and Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Maddox: RE: Marathon Bank -Route 50 West Project e-mail: kapocsis@frederickk12va.us This letter is in response to your request for comments concerning the rezoning application for the proposed Marathon Bank -Route 50 West project located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. Based on the information provided that states no residential units will be part of the rezoning, there will be no impact to the school population upon build -out. Respectfully yours, Stephen Kapocsi Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent SMK/dkr cc: William C. Dean, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools 540-662-3889 Ext 112 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604-2546 FAX 540-662-3890 • • FILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 January 14, 2005 Mr. C.E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Senior Vice -President Patton Harris Rust & Associates 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Proposed Rezoning of Marathon Bank/Route 50 West Property Submitted for Preliminary Review: November 12, 2004 Dear Chuck: I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Marathon Bank/Route 50 West Property. The rezoning application seeks to rezone 1.0 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to the B2 (Business General) District. Staffs review comments are listed below for your consideration. General Comments. The key to implementing the entire Round Hill Community Plan is the provision of public water and sewer. It is critical that this development enable the continuation of water and sewer lines to adjacent areas in Round Hill. This project could facilitate the provision of sewer and water to Ward Avenue, the Candy Hill Campground and the 7-11 on Route 50. I would also encourage the planning of this site as part of a wider area that includes the adjacent Funkhouser/Poe properties. This would allow for shared access points and inter - parcel connectors. 2. Surveyed Plat. Please supply a surveyed plat of the subject properties, which shows all property lines and proposed zoning boundary lines. Metes and bounds should be provided to verify exact locations of lots and zoning boundaries. 3. Deed. The only deed provided was for the Marathon Bank property. Please also provide a copy of the deeds for the Francis properties. 4. Deed. The PIN numbers on the Marathon Bank deed (040018770) are incorrect. The correct PIN numbers are 53B-3-5 and 53B-3-6. 5. Verification that taxes have been paid. Please provide a receipt from the Treasurer's office which verifies that real estate taxes for the properties have been paid. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page 2 Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr. RE: Proposed Rezoning of Marathon Bank/Route 50 West Property January 14, 2005 6. Adjacent parcels. Adjoining parcel 53-A-68 is zoned B2 (Business General) and MS (Medical Support). Please correct the text and maps. The address for the property owners of adjacent parcel 53 A 82 (Funkhouser/Poe) does not match the address shown in the Planning Department database. Please verify the address with the Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue, Real Estate Division. 7. Impact Assessment Statement. A. Introduction. It its unclear how the site could accommodate up to four drive through lanes. Please provide greater details on this aspect. B. Comprehensive Policy Plan. The site falls within Phase One of the Round Hill Community Land.Use Plan. The proposed use (bank/office) is generally in conformance with that plan. a. While the site is wholly within the Sewer and Water Service Area, the Round Hill Plan states that business/office development would require the extension of public sewer and water. The extension of public sewer and water will need to be verified. Continuation of sewer and water to nearby sites in Round Hill (including the future line on Ward Avenue) should be enabled, not hindered, by this development b. The Round Hill Plan clearly states that commercial establishments should front feeder roads which connect to Route 50 at signalized intersections. This discourages individual business entrances on Route 50 both for aesthetic reasons as well as transportation efficiency. The proposed right in only entrance on Route 50 is therefore contrary to the Round Hill Plan. It would be advantageous to consider a joint entrance with the adjacent Funkhouser/Poe properties. These adjacent sites include an eight acre parcel and a one acre parcel further to the west, both in the same ownership. Should a joint entrance be secured further west on the Funkhouser/Poe property, it might be possible to achieve a right in and right out access point for a number of adjacent, inter -connected parcels. The Round Hill Plan calls for standards to minimize the visual disruption to the Route 50 corridor. The Plan calls for discreet signage with a maximum 10% of fagade area. A monument sign is recommended if a free-standing sign is sought. The Plan also calls for a green space along Route 50, which might include a bike or walking trail. In addition, the Plan calls for screening of structure and parking areas, controlling the size, 0 • Page 3 Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr. RE: Proposed Rezoning of Marathon Bank/Route 50 West Property January 14, 2005 number and location of signs, and requiring underground utilities. All of these design considerations should be taken into consideration, and may be appropriate as proffers to implement the goals of the Comprehensive Plan. d. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Route 50 as a short-term designated route. As a 10' linear trail is planned on the north side of Route 50, it might be more appropriate to provide a sidewalk on the south side of Route 50. C. Suitability of the Site. Individual entrances on Route 50 are not in keeping with the Round Hill Plan (see above). The full two way entrance on Ward Avenue is in keeping with the Round Hill Plan. D. Transportation. A complete traffic impact analysis was not provided with this draft rezoning. Therefore staff is unable to provide transportation comments at this time. Clearly the TIA will need to take account of the nearby WWW, LC development and the Winchester Medical Center— West Campus development. Staff had previously identified that a new TIA would be required for this property given the significant development occurring in this area. Also, it is unclear how the intersection of Route 50 and Ward Avenue will be configured at this site. For instance, the right turn land in front of this site on Route 50 appears to end and not provide a clear turn onto Ward Avenue. Please provide greater details. E. Impact on Community Facilities. Please include a copy of the Capital Facilities Impact Model summary (output module). 8. Proposed Proffer Statement (Including Generalized Development Plan). A. Drive Through. The Generalized Development Plan does not show a drive through, although this is mentioned in the text of the application. It is unclear how a drive through could be accommodated on this site. Please provide details. B. 10' Landscaped Corridor Buffer. Proffer 2.2 calls for a 10' landscaped corridor buffer with mixed ornamental plantings. This does not include the shade trees that are required by the ordinance as perimeter landscaping for parking lots. (The Round Hill Plan also calls for shade trees on both sides of the street.) The proffer should be restated to provide landscaping that is in addition to ordinance requirements, not landscaping as a substitute to • 0 Page 4 Mr. C. E. Maddox, Jr. RE: Proposed Rezoning of Marathon Bank/Route 50 West Property January 14, 2005 minimum ordinance requirements. I would also point that the ordinance requires a minimum of 15% of a B2 site to be landscaped. C. Adjacent Property. The GDP shows the use of the Holliday property as vacant. This is incorrect. There is a residence on that property. Therefore, a B Category buffer is required by ordinance. Also, plans should indicate the distance between the property to be rezoned and this residence. 9. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the following agencies: Frederick County Attorney, Historic Resources Advisory Board, Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshall, Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation, Frederick County Sanitation Authority, Frederick -Winchester Health Department, City of Winchester, Round Hill Fire and Rescue Company and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority. 10. Fees. The fee for this application includes a $1,000.00 base fee plus $50.00 per acre, and a $50.00 public hearing sign fee. Thus, a total of $1,100.00 is due upon submission of the official rezoning application. This is based on fees as at January 12, 2005. Fees may change. 11. Special Limited Power of Attorney. Please have the property owners complete the special limited power of attorney form which authorizes you to represent them during the application process. All of the above comments should be appropriately addressed, and a TIA submitted, before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please do not hesitate to contact me with questions regarding this application. Sincerely, Susan K. Eddy, AICP Senior Planner SKE/dlw Marathon Bank —Route 50 West Rezoning IV. AGENCY COMMENTS MARATHON BANK — ROUTE 50 WEST REZONING i IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT March 2005 A. INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared for the purpose of assessing the impact on Frederick County by the conditional rezoning of parcels 53B-3-5, 6, 7, & 8, owned by Marathon Bank, which total 1.00 acre. The subject parcels are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 interchange. The subject parcels are currently zoned RA (Rural Areas). This application proposes the rezoning of the 1.00-acre site to the B2 (Business General) District. The site is intended to develop with bank and general office uses. The planned uses would be located within a single building whose gross floor area would not exceed 8,000 square feet. The design of this facility will include multiple drive through lanes to serve bank customers. B. COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN The subject parcels are located within the Phase One boundaries of the Round Hill Community Land Use Plan. The properties are located wholly within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). The Round Hill Community Land Use Plan envisions the development of business/office land uses on the site subject to the availability of central sewer and water facilities. The proposed rezoning of the subject parcels to the B2 District to allow branch bank and general office land uses is therefore consistent with the applicable land use policies of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. C. SUITABILITY OF THE SITE The site is currently developed with a single family residence and restaurant (formerly Kathy's Tortuga), neither of which conforms fully with current zoning requirements. The residence straddles two legally non -conforming RA zoned parcels (53B-3-7 & 8), each of which consists of approximately 0.25 acre. The restaurant similarly sits on two undersized RA zoned properties (53B-3-5 & 6), and was developed on the site without meeting typical commercial development standards governing parking, site entrances, and buffering and landscaping. The rezoning of the site to the B2 District will facilitate resolution of these non - conformities, as its ultimate redevelopment with bank and general office uses will occur pursuant to current site development requirements. Impact Analysis Statement r Site Development a Marathon Bank — Route 50 West The Round Hill Community Land Use Plan identifies the enhancement of corridor appearance as an important policy objective. The proposed proffer statement submitted with this rezoning includes a commitment to provide a 10-foot wide landscaped corridor buffer along the frontage of the property. This buffer area will complement similar features that will be installed on the opposite side of Northwestern Pike pursuant to the proffers approved with the WWW and Winchester Medical Center - West Campus rezoning applications. Coupled with the distinctive architecture typical of new Marathon Bank facilities, the landscaped buffer will achieve an aesthetic quality consistent with applicable corridor appearance policies. Access The subject site has approximately 210 feet of frontage along Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50) and roughly 223 feet of frontage on Ward Avenue (Route 1317). The existing uses each possess individual entrances on Northwestern Pike, and the restaurant use is also accessed via an entrance on Ward Avenue. The proposed development of the site with bank and general office land uses will result in improved access management along Northwestern Pike. The two existing entrances will be eliminated and a right in only entrance will be installed as the sole point of access from Northwestern Pike. Such measures will minimize potential conflict points and enhance the safety and efficiency of traffic movement on the impacted segment of Northwestern Pike. Moreover, the proposed right in only entrance provides a limited albeit critical means of access to the planned uses from Northwestern Pike that will be both functionally and aesthetically integrated with the corridor as a whole. A full entrance will be provided on Ward Avenue that will be aligned with the existing entrance to the 7-11 convenience store. All traffic exiting the site will use Ward Avenue to reach Northwestern Pike. It is noted that the intersection of Ward Avenue and Northwestern Pike will be signalized pursuant to the proffer statement approved with the Winchester Medical Center - West Campus rezoning. Environmental Features The site does not contain any environmental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. In particular, there are no identified areas of steep slopes, flood plain or wetlands/hydrologic soils on the parcels included in this application. 2 Impact Analysis Statement Marathon Bank — Route 50 West Soils The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia indicates that the soils comprising the subject parcels fall under the Frederick-Poplimento- Oaklet soil association. The predominant soil type on the site is Carbo-Oaklet silt loam, 2 to 15 percent slopes (map symbol 6C), as shown on map sheet number 29 of the survey. This soil type is not considered prime farmland. The characteristics of this soil type and any implications for site development are manageable through the site engineering process. D. TRANSPORTATION As noted above, access to the site will occur through a right in only entrance on Northwestern Pike (Route 50) and a full entrance on Ward Avenue (Route 1317). These entrances will be installed as generally depicted on the proffered Generalized Development Plan (GDP), pursuant to the specifications and requirements of both VDOT and Frederick County. Development of this project will occur in the context of an actively evolving transportation environment along the Northwestern Pike corridor. Detailed planning and design has been completed for implementation of the initial phase of the coordinated transportation improvement program proffered with the WWW, LC and Winchester Medical Center — West Campus rezoning applications. These improvements will add travel and turn lanes to Northwestern Pike, and further include signalization of the intersection of Northwestern Pike and Ward Avenue. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) was prepared for this application using composite data collected from other studies in the area as well as actual traffic counts. Using traffic generation figures from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, 7tn Edition, the TIA projects that the proposed development will produce 1,716 average daily vehicle trips (ADT). The TIA further indicates that study area roads and intersections have the capacity to accommodate the trips generated by this project at acceptable and manageable level of service conditions. (see A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank — Route 50 West, dated 3/22/05) It is noted that the TIA projects peak hour Level of Service "D" conditions for certain movements at the intersection of Ward Avenue and Northwestern Pike at project build out. As demonstrated by the TIA, such conditions are expected due to background traffic growth along the corridor, and will be experienced regardless of the introduction of bank -generated trips. Level of service conditions on study area roads and intersections will therefore not be diminished by the traffic impacts attributable to the proposed rezoning. 3 Impact Analysis Statement Marathon Bank — Route 50 West E. SEWAGE CONVEYANCE AND WATER SUPPLY A 20" regional water transmission line is scheduled to cross U.S. Route 50 and follow Ward Avenue south. The current contract to extend water and sewer service to the Winchester Medical Center — West Campus site will enable this water main extension across Route 50. The ultimate extension will provide sufficient water supply and pressure for domestic and fire protection purposes on the subject site. Likewise, an 8" gravity sewer main will be extended from the regional pump station located on the Winchester Medical Center — West Campus site, immediately north of Route 50. This line will provide adequate gravity sewer service to the site. Using the standard water consumption rate for bank and general office uses of 200 GPD per 1,000 square feet of floor area, the proposed use of the site will consume approximately 1,600 GPD of water and produce equivalent sewer flows. F. DRAINAGE The 1.00 acre -site naturally drains to the north and east. It is anticipated that low impact development techniques together with good erosion control practice will Mitigate adverse stormwater discharge impacts. Actual specification of temporary and permanent facilities will be provided with final engineering and will comply with all local, state and federal regulations. G. SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL The planned development of the subject site is projected to generate 200 pounds of solid waste per day (0.10 T/day). Solid waste will be transferred to the Frederick County landfill by commercial carrier. H. HISTORICAL SITES AND STRUCTURES The Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey does not identify any potentially significant structures on the 1.00 acre -site or within close proximity of the properties. The subject properties are located within the National Parks Service study area for the Second Winchester battlefield, but are wholly outside of identified core battlefield areas. I. IMPACT ON COMMUNITY FACILITIES The Frederick County Fiscal Impact Model was run to assess the likely impact of the proposed project on capital facilities. The output module generated by this analysis indicated that the proposed land uses would result in a net positive fiscal f 0 Impact Analysis Statement 0 Marathon Bank —Route 50 West impact. Nevertheless, the applicant has proffered to contribute a total of $4,000 to Frederick County for Fire and Rescue Department and Sheriff's Office purposes, respectively. This contribution is offered in recognition of the unique demands on public safety services commonly associated with commercial development. 5 t / .< _` ' 1 �+'*Q` Y" ` •;V -� ''4, y, r i . .+�. "a J `q/ p Ms ft , ,,` % �.�,e�_ irk 3 m ♦ � _ CL AIJ M1ru 3x �*y^^a � ,�qJS� Y f1y' t�l rr - 1'S.''h�? �t�4 �'q;�,.. ANe. '4i �- y�1411"o, .+' ��`'l'? l "y „CCL .�. 'rA,t�R f "r; "r'J' ` J t�S _ s • o X; `�,=Z t 4 T «*��i �;,yfy ���r�4�$yY .� ,�{i1tr��-.�'"� \� _ .``••.< � �! 1 +� �: dt., ,t�' k j [n v'�i .��c : 1d '�i r'� , c-t� ari > , .y`��. a.:4�/ �'n'y�, ',y,L ,ii� w�•' . -. o a g 6.+ P" a7,j.4r i; .t#9g�KfS-. i x \41& . q fW,,,r-r r - ,,S• N Wv t ­77P 1 r.y:/• ,1 I6 O ✓5 'qua Y s y tb✓�x F. y '* ei LIZ � j „.� �a.,i?� � ... �t �k •. x f�a` 5 � ah ' � , t �.t t, JF a�,t �15i arr �f� e{" ` � � 3 i � f f, Imo' � �� d{ of ih a '' t ° .'� - � •:: t a ar +� 9 •fi to y. •�. ,a b �„ ,f s ,.,' 1011104 1 f — 500 V t ssj,y ..� •� • ° i f' r ♦n", wtrY>! »,K;E!�, "'R .i a l US ROUTE 50 >' sv, :y' .. ate"' � "� ,,R �s �' ,� �� i � •• `a s r r e ! M Pk.,OCT AREA 7-11 o MARATHON BANK gilbert w. clifford & associates \ US ROUTE 50 o division of o \ EXISTING CONDITIONS Patton, Harris, Rust &Associates, pc O O 117 E. Picodilly St. Vinchester, Virginia 22601 FREDERICK COUNTY, �IRGINM VOICE: (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank - Route 50 West 1 Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for: Don Unger 4095 Valley Pike Winchester, VA 22601 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Engineers. Surveyors. Planners, Lcndsccpe Architects, PHRlt 300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200 Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401 T 304.264.2711 F 304.264.3671 March 22, 2005 E OVERVIEW Project Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed Marathon Bank -Route 50 West located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Route 50 (Northwestern Pike)/ Ward Avenue, in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed development is to include an 8,000 square foot bank with two access points to be provided along Route 50 and Ward Avenue, respectively. The proposed project will be built -out in a single transportation phase by the Year 2007. PHR+A has provided Figure 1 to illustrate the location of the Marathon Bank with respect to the surrounding roadway network. Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the proposed Marathon Bank -Route 50 West were obtained through a sequence of activities as the narratives that follow document: • Assessment of background traffic including growth rates and other planned projects in the area of impact, • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed Marathon Bank, • Distribution and assignment of the proposed Marathon Bank generated trips onto the study area road network, • Analysis of capacity and levels of service for existing and future conditions using HCS-2000 (Highway Capacity Software). P" R fE A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West March 22, 2005 Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 1 9 0 No Scale ij �r r'7 Wincherter Regional 1. tul eelIC a I Cenfei ii Q/Y ii Ch: 50 Round Hitt Rd p n "SITE P3° iQer/- " Dvhor, �� r; --- i t 1`t yQyddCTi�=_._� r r Q� 8"O"Or Dr Ile" - PT TR + rn Figure 1 Vicinity Map - Marathon Bank (Route 50 West) A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West PH ,1 March 22, 2005 Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 2 0 ! EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR+A conducted AM/PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the intersections of Route 50/Ward Avenue and Ward Avenue/7-11 Site -Driveway in Frederick County, Virginia. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using ,a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 8.3% as determined from Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data. Figure 2, shows the existing ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections of Route 50/ Ward Avenue and Ward Avenue/ 7-11 Site -Driveway. Figure 3 shows the respective existing lane geometry and peak hour levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. P - A -s A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West J�F� , q-@.;^ March 22, 2005 L �?: Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 3 0 • No Scale 50 G: Figure 2 4 ..486(1444) ,r 60(97) Northwestern Pike :;� (672)1052.+ (20)13 Q° SITE Site Existing 7-11 D1ivettay'#2 Convenience Store o 11 L 36i36) 2(3) r7-I1 Site D rivewaY AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) DailyAverage Existing Traffic Conditions A Traffic hnpact Analysis for the Marathon Bwzk-Route 50 West March 22, 2005 Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 4 r No Scale 50 Unsignalized Intersection 1— 4— d-' B(A)* Northwestern Pike r qqq .Vr r3 W r� q` SITE Existing 7-11 Site Driv`ite Convenience Store 7-11 Sit ett Dn 'A (A) 7-11Site v Driveway 3 Denotes stop sign control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) A `Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement -} Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic hnpact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West M March 22, 2005 �1 Project Number 12851-1-0 Page 5 2007 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS PHR+A grew the existing traffic volumes along Route 50 (Northwestern Pike) and Ward Avenue using a conservative rate of five percent (5%) per year through Year 2007. PHR+A utilized the report titled: A Traffic Impact Analysis of the WWW Property, by PHR+A, dated December 5, 2002, to incorporate all trips relating to "other developments" located within the vicinity of the proposed Marathon Bank site. Based upon the 7a' Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has provided Table 1 to summarize the 2007 "other developments" trip generation. Figure 4 shows the 2007 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at the intersections of Route 501 Ward Avenue and Ward Avenue/ 7-11 Site -Driveway. Figure 5 shows the corresponding 2007 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. Table 1 "Other Developments" 2007 Trip Generation Summary ITE Land Use Amount AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ADT In Out Total In Out Total Code Valley Health Systems Property 150 Warehousing (Distribution Center) 5 acres 63 25 88 26 48 73 383 710 Office (Administration Building) 50,000 SF 95 13 108 23 112 135 782 750 Office Park - 5 acres 350 30 381 34 194 228 2,241 620 Nursing Home 24,000 SF 6 3 9 5 5 10 146 253 Elderly Housing - Attached 80 units 3 4 6 5 3 9 278 Sub -total 517 75 592 93 362 455 3,831 Degrange Property 312 Business Hotel 50 rooms 17 12 29 19 12 31 364 760 Research & Development Park 5 acres 70 13 84 9 68 77 398 820 Shopping Center 25,000 SF 42 27 68 120 130 251 2,758 912 Drive-in Bank 2,400 SF 17 13 30 55 55 110 694 832 I-I-T Restaurant 7,600 SF 46 42 88 51 32 83 966 Sub -total 191 107 298 254 298 552 5,180 W W W Property 750 Office Park 5 acres 350 30 381 34 194 228 2,241 813 Discount Superstore 135,000 SF 127 122 248 252 262 514 6,030 820 Shopping Center 25,000 SF 42 27 68 120 130 251 2,758 Sub -total 519 179 697 406 586 993 11,028 Total 1,227 360 1,587 753 1,247 1,999 20,040 A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West R' March 22, 2005 H�s Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 6 • No Scale i a r� �-- � 199(76) N o o 4-- 951(1895) �— 69(112) Northwestern Pike �Z � (60)109*r ' r ���� (1132)1312�1 (23)15—N o Q SITE Site Existing 7-11 DnVewaj,#z Convenience Store M � a 1 �36(36) '-2(3) m I �-11Site Driveu-a}� v M M Q � a L R AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) n-r TP+n _ ,. Trips Figure 4 2007 Background Traffic Conditions A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West March 22, 2005 Project Number 12881-1-0 t Page 7 0 1J No Scale if� Figure 5 Existing 7-11 Convenience Store '' Denotes STOP sign control Denotes traffic signal control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) .rDenotes Critical Unsignalized Movement 2007 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A. A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route SO West r M 22, 2005 Project Numberer 12881-1-0 a Page 8 TRIP GENERATION PHR+A determined the number of trips entering and exiting the site using equations and rates provided in the 71h Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report. Table 2 was prepared to summarize the total trip generation associated with the proposed Marathon Bank development. Table 2 Marathon Bank -Route 50 West Trip Generation Summary AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Code Land Use Amount In Out Total In Out Total ADT 912 Drive-in Bank 8,000 SF 55 43 99 183 183 366 1,716 Total 55 - 43 99 183 183 366 1,716 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENTS The distribution of trips was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed Marathon Bank site. PHR+A utilized the trip distribution percentages shown in Figure 6 to assign the proposed Marathon Bank development trips (Table 2) throughout the study area. Figure 7 shows the respective development -generated ADT and AM/PM peak hour trip assignments. 2007 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The proposed Marathon Bank development assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2007 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2007 build -out conditions. Figure 8 shows the 2007 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2007 build -out lane geometry and peak hour levels of service. All HCS-2000 levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. P A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West March 22, 2005 y Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 9 0 No Scale C: Figure 6 Trip Distribution Percentages R A Tra c hnpact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West �L March 22, 2000 Project Number 12881-1- Page 10 No Scale so (27)8 0-0 ~ 7(27) 50 Q �l' e-47(156) Northwestern Pike 0 q SITE Site Existing 7-11 ID Site Convenience Store � b Q R (183)43-41* 1111Si[e Driveu,,y a Q PT TR Figure 7 Development -Generated Trip Assignments A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West March 22, 2005 Pp A -1 1 Project Number 12881-I-0 t Page 11 No Scale Northwest... Pjk e (1215�1�8� ~1073(2085) 4 Q M N o %. 199(76) f— 951(1895) . 4— 116(268) Northwestern Pike (60)109—** m (1132)1312--+ (23)15 4` SITE site . Existing 7-11 Driveway #2 Convenience Store y b a "fir b M Q n MN V� � R q _L 36(36) (183)43 ` *-2() (0)Oy r 7-Ilsite (0)0 � , o t I Ddvc,,,ay 3Q LP . ..+A Figure 8 2007 Build -out Traffic Conditions A Tra c I171pact Analysis for the Marathon Bal&-Route SO West March 22, 2005 Project Number 12881-1-0 Page 12 0 • No Scale New Intersection: EB Right Turn Lane WB Thru Lane 50 Unsignattzed Intersection ' Existing 7-11 Convenience Store - '' Denotes STOP sign control IDenotes traffic signal control AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) *Denotes Critical Unsignalized Movement nY T�+n Figure 9 2007 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service -� A Traffic Impact Analysis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West March 22, 2005 • L Project Number 12881-1-0 a Page 13 CONCLUSION The traffic impacts associated with the proposed Marathon Bank -Route 50 West site are acceptable and manageable. Based upon HCS-2000 results, all intersection located within study, area roadway network will operate with levels of service "D" or better during 2007 total build -out conditions assuming the improvements shown in Figures 5 (2007 background) and 9 (2007 build -out), respectively. In addition, according to the procedures described in Figure 2-10 ("Traffic Signal Warrants" worksheet) of the Manual of Trams Signal Design published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers', the proposed intersection will maintain sufficient traffic volumes as to warrant traffic signalization. For informational purposes, Table A-1 is provided in the Appendix section of this report. PHR+A has also performed analyses to determine the need for turn -lane treatments at the proposed intersections of Route 50/ Ward Avenue and Route 501 Site -Driveway #1. The requirements for implementing mainline right -turn lanes are outlined in Figure C-1-9 ("Guidelines for Right -Turn Treatment: Four -Lane Highway"), of the VDOT Road Design Manual. Based upon the volumes shown in Figure 8, a full width right -turn lane would not be required for the intersections of Route 50/ Ward Avenue and Route 50/ Site -Driveway #1. For informational purposes, Figure C-1-9 is provided in the Appendix section of this report. _ A Traffic Impact Analvsis for the Marathon Bank -Route 50 West R March 22, 2005 Project Number 12881-1-0 A e Page 14 0 0 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS and LEVEL OF SERVICE The most current analysis methodologies used for evaluating the capacity of intersections were developed by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) in conjunction with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and other members of the transportation profession. This methodology is represented in TRB Special Report Number 209, The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Computerized methods for conducting these analyses were developed by FHWA; and are the methods used in this report. The following brief explanations of the methodologies are adapted from the HCM. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - TWSC At an unsignalized two-way stop -controlled (TWSC) intersection, the major street has continuous right of way while the side street is controlled by a stop sign or yield sign. In operation, vehicles exiting the side street and crossing or turning into the main street flow must wait for "acceptable gaps" in the main street flow. The same is true of left -turning traffic from the main street that must cross the opposing flow. The analysis takes into account the probability of a gap in the main street traffic. The probability and number of acceptable gaps is lower in higher volume flows. The acceptability of a gap is modified by physical factors (sight distance, turning radius, etc.) and by characteristics of the traffic flow (percentage trucks, buses, etc.). In the analysis in these reports, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional information was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks (single unit and tractor -trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for TWSC intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the intersection as a whole. The total delay is defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line; this time includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last -in -queue position to the first -in - queue position. ;Level of Service Criteria `for.. TWSC, Intersections • 0 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - AWSC At an unsignalized all -way stop -controlled (AWSC) intersection, all directions are controlled by a stop sign. Operation of AWSC intersections requires that every vehicle stop at the intersection before proceeding. Since each driver is required to stop, the judgment as to whether to proceed into the intersection is a function of the traffic conditions on the other (opposing and conflicting) approaches. Therefore, a driver proceeds only after determining that there are no vehicles currently in the intersection and that it is safe to proceed. The analysis takes into account the problem of determining, under capacity conditions for a given approach, the factors that influence the rate at which vehicles can depart successfully from the STOP line. Traffic at other approaches, which increases potential conflict, translates directly into longer driver decision times and saturation headways. The saturation headways are also influenced by characteristics of the traffic flow (slow accelerating vehicles, left turns, etc.). In the analysis in this reports, all default values suggested by the HCM were used unless additional information was available. These defaults include the estimated percentage of trucks (single unit and tractor -trailer), buses and motorcycles. The level of service for AWSC intersections is determined only for individual movements - not for the intersection as a whole. The total delay is defined as the total elapsed time from when a vehicle stops at the end of the queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line; this time includes the time required for the vehicle to travel from the last -in -queue position to the first -in - queue position. SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The operation (and therefore the capacity) of a signalized intersection is complicated by the fact that the signal is allocating time between conflicting traffic movements - movements that must use the same physical space. The analysis, therefore, must not only look at the physical geometry of the intersection, but the signal timing aspects as well. In the analysis of signalized intersections, two terms are important: volume to capacity ratio (v/c) and; average stopped delay (seconds per vehicle). The theoretical capacity is based on the physical geometry, the available green time (often expressed as G/C), and the traffic mix (e.g. trucks use more capacity than cars). The average stopped delay may be calculated from the v/c ratio, cycle length, quality of progression on the arterial and available green time on each approach. In this report all the default values recommended by the HCM are used unless other specific information is available (percentage of trucks, pedestrians, etc.). Existing signal timings are observed and used whenever possible. When future signals are being evaluated, an "optional" signal timing is calculated based on projected volumes. The level of service is based on the calculated average delay per vehicle for each approach and for the intersection as a whole. Based on extensive research studies, the maximum delay acceptable by the average driver is sixty seconds per vehicle at a signalized intersection. This is defined as the upper limit on the possible range of delay/level of service criteria. The following criteria describe the full range of level of service: LeveTof Service Criteria for Signalized'Intersechons LEVEL OF SERVICE DESCRIPTIONS FOR SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level of Service Description A Level of Service A describes operations with very low delay, up to 10 sec per vehicle. This level of service occurs when progression is extremely favorable, and most vehicles arrive during the green phase. Most vehicles do not stop at all. Short cycle lengths may also contribute to low delay. B Level of Service B describes operations with delay greater than 10 and up to 20 sec per vehicle. This level generally occurs with good progression, short cycle lengths, or both. More vehicles stop than for LOS A, causing higher levels of average delay. C Level Of Service C describes operations with delay greater than 20 and up to 35 sec per vehicle. These higher delays may result from fair progression, longer cycle lengths, or both. Individual cycle failures may begin to appear in this level. The number of vehicles stopping is significant at this level, though many still pass though the intersection without stopping. D Level of Service D describes operations with delay greater than 35 and up to 55 sec per vehicle. At level D, the influence of congestion becomes more noticeable. Longer delays may result from some combination of unfavorable progression, longer cycle lengths, or high We ratios. Many vehicles stop, and the proportion of vehicles not stopping declines. Individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Level of Service E describes operations with delay greater than 55 and up to 80 sec per vehicle. This level is considered by many agencies to be the limit of acceptable delay. These high delay values generally indicate poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high We ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. F Level of Service F describes operations with delay in excess of 80 sec per vehicle. This level, considered to be unacceptable to most drivers, often occurs with over saturation, that is, when arrival flow rates exceed the capacity of the intersection. It may also occur at high We ratios below 1.0 with many individual cycle failures. Poor progression and cycle lengths may also be major contributing causes to such delay levels. Two -Way Stop Control . Page 1 of 2 I� r TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212312004 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 50 &Ward Avenue Jurisdiction Winchester, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Route 50 North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 1052 13 60 486 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 1107 13 63 511 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 - 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 37 0 31 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 38 0 32 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 0 3 0 --t 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration I LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 63 70 Capacity, cm (vph) 614 157 We ratio 0.10 0.45 Queue length (95%) 0.34 2.03 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 45.2 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapall y\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A34.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control Page 2 of 2 LOS B E Approach delay 45.2 (s/veh) - Approach LOS -- -- E HCS200JM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A34.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Intersection Route 50 &Ward Avenue Agency/Co. PHR+A Jurisdiction Winchester, VA Date Performed 1212312004 Analysis Year Existing Conditions Anal sis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Route 50 North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 672 20 97 1444 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 707 21 102 1520 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration T TR L T ,Upstream Si nal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R. L T R Volume veh/h 64 0 28 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 67 0 29 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 0 3 0 T77F 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB , WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 102 96 Capacity, cm (vph) 865 101 v/c ratio 0.12 0.95 Queue length (95%) 0.40 5.70 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.7 153.5 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A38.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 Page 2 of 2 LOS A F Approach delay -- 153.5 (s/veh) Approach LOS - -- F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C: \Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A38.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 • Page 1 of 2 i TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 12/23/2004 AM Peak Hour Intersection urisdiction Analysis Year Site Driveway &Ward Avenue Winchester, VA Existing Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Site Driveway North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 32 3 39 34 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 33 1 3 41 1 35 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 2 0 36 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 37 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 41 39 C (m) (vph) 1568 1030 v/c 0.03 0.04 95% queue length 0.08 0.12 Control Delay 7.4 8.6 LOS A A Approach Delay - -- 8.6 Approach LOS - -- A Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local %20Settings\Temp\u2k6A3C.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 1212312004 PM Peak Hour Intersection urisdiction nalysis Year Site Driveway &Ward Avenue Winchester, VA Existing Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Site Driveway North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 56 4 43 74 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 58 4 45 77 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 3 0 36 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 37 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 45 40 C (m) (vph) 1535 984 vlc 0.03 0.04 95% queue length 0.09 0.13 Control Delay 7.4 8.8 LOS A A Approach Delay -- -- 8.8 Approach LOS - -- A Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents%20and %20Settings\Boyapall y\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A40.trop 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control • 0 Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212312004 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Route 50 Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume veh/h 109 1312 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 114 1381 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv --T 0 Median type RT Channelized? Lanes 1 2 Configuration L T Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement- 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) 43 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 45 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 0 Percent grade (%) 0 Flared approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized? Lanes 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L L Volume, v (vph) 114 72 Capacity, cm (vph) 584 481 v/c ratio 0.20 0.15 Queue length (95%) 0.72 0.52 Intersection Route 50 &Ward Avenue Jurisdiction Winchester, VA Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Jorth/South Street: Ward Avenue study Period (hrs): 0.25 Westbound 3 4 5 6 R L T R 15 69 951 199 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 15 72 1001 209 -- 3 -- -- Undivided 0 0 0 1 2 1 TR L T R 0 Southbound 9 10 11 12 R L T R 36 119 0 23 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 37 125 0 24 3 3 0 3 0 N 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 L R Northbound Southbound 7 8 9 10 11 12 LR L R 82 125 24 28 21 514 2.93 5.95 0.05 9.87 15.94 0.15 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\13oyapall y\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6AI4.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control • Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 12.7 13.8 1166 2595 12.3 LOS 8 8 F F 8 Approach delay (s/veh) 1166 2179 Approach LOS -- -- F F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A 14.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control . i Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212312004 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 50 &Ward Avenue Jurisdiction Winchester, VA Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions i Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Route 50 North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 60 1132 23 112 1895 76 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 63 1191 24 117 1994 80 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 1 2 1 Configuration L T TR L T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement . 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 74 0 32 494 0 93 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 77 0 33 520 0 97 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 0 3 3 0 3 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 1 0 1 Configuration LR L R Control Delay,Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LR L R Volume, v (vph) 63 117 110 520 97 Capacity, cm (vph) 261 564 7 4 241 v/c ratio 0.24 0.21 15.71 130.00 0.40 Queue length (95%) 0.92 0.77 15.53 67.39 1.83 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\BoyapallyV-ocal%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A18.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 2 of 2 Control Delay s/veh 23.1 13.0 7651 59848 29.6 LOS C 8 F F D Approach delay (s/veh) -- 7651 50444 Approach LOS - -- F F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20Scttings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Tcmp\u2k6Al8.tmp 2/3/2005 rI rI HCS200V DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212812004 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 50 & Ward Avenue Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Background Conditions Project ID Marathon Bank - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N� 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L TR L T R LR L R Volume, V (vph) 109 1312 15 69 951 199 43 36 119 23 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 0 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, I, 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, I 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N -0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT I Only SB Only 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 35.0 G= G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= G= IY= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= IY= 5 Y= 5 Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 115 1397 73 1001 209 83 125 24 Lane group capacity, c 181 2508 175 1759 565 169 351 404 v/c ratio, X 0.64 0.56 0.42 0.57 0.37 0.49 1 0.36 0.06 Total green ratio, g/C 0.10 0.50 0.10 , 0.35 0.35 0.10 0.10 0.25 Uniform delay, d1 43.2, 17.3 42.3 26.4 24.3 42.6 42.0 28.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.22 0.15 0.11 0.16 10.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc i • Incremental delay, d2 7.2 0.3 1.6 1 0.4 0.4 2.2 0.6 0.1 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 50.4 17.6 43.9 26.8 24.7 44.8 42.6 28.6 Lane group LOS D 8 D C C D D C Approach delay 20.1 27.4 44.8 40.4 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection delay 24.9 Xc = 0.53 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.le Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Detailed Report 0 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS2000' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212812004 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Route 56 & Ward Avenue Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Y2007 Background sear Conditions Project ID Marathon Bank - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N1 1 3 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 2 0 1 Lane group L TR L T R LR L R Volume, V (vph) 60 1132 23 112 1895 76 74 32 494 93 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 0 3 3 3 3 0 3 3 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left WB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only SB Only 07 08 Timing G= 10.0 G= 10.0 G= 28.0 G= G= 10.0 G= 17.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= IY= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 63 1216 118 1995 80 112 520 98 Lane group capacity, c 181 1403 438 2161 694 171 596 517 0.35 0.87 0.27 0.92 0.12 0.65 0.87 0.19 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapall y\Local%20Setdngs\Temp\s2k6A58.tmp 2/3/2005 Detailed Report 1 Page 2 of 2 v/c ratio, X Total green ratio, g/C 0.10 0.28 0.25 0.43 0.43 0.10 0.17 0.32 Uniform delay, d1 42.0 34.2 30.2 26.9 17.1 43.3 40.4 24.6 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.40 0.11 0.44 0.11 0.23 0.40 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 1.2 6.0 0.3 7.3 0.1 8.7 13.4 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 43.1 40.2 30.5 34.2 17.2 52.1 53.9 24.8 Lane group LOS D D C C 8 D D C Approach delay 40.4 33.4 52.1 49.3 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection delay 38.3 XC = 0.81 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k6A58.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 1212312004 AM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Site Driveway &Ward Avenue Winchester, VA 2007 Background Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Site Driveway North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 37 3 39 39 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 38 3 41 41 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 3 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT ,Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 2 0 36 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 1 37 0 1 0 1 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0. 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (vph) 41 39 C (m) (vph) 1562 - 1013 v/c 0.03 0.04 95% queue length 0.08 0.12 Control Delay 7.4 8.7 LOS A A Approach Delay - -- 8.7 Approach LOS - -- A file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapall y\Local%20Settings\Temp\u21c6A1 C.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 1212312004 PM Peak Hour Intersection Jurisdiction Analysis Year Site Driveway &Ward Avenue Winchester, VA 2007 Background Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Site Driveway North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 65 4 43 86 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 68 4 45 90 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type - Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 3 0 36 0 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 1 37 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay,Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (vph) 45 40 C (m) (vph) 1522 962 vlc 0.03 0.04 95% queue length 0.09 0.13 Control Delay 7.4 8.9 LOS A A Approach Delay -- -- 8.9 Approach LOS -- -- A file://C:\Documents %20and%20Settings\B oyapally\Local %20S ettings\Temp\u2k6A20.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 1 of 2 I( ral Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information HR+A Intersection HR+AJurisdiction /23/200411 Analvsis Year Analyst P Agency/Co. P Date Performed 12 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Hour 'te 50 &Ward Avenue chester, VA 7 Buildout Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Route 50 North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 1383 15 116 1021 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 1455 15 122 1074 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration T TR L T U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 49 0 73 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 51 0 76 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 0 3 0 0 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 122 127 Capacity, cm (vph) 450 58 v/c ratio 0.27 2.19 ,Queue length (95%) 1.09 12.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 15.9 699.2 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A24.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 10 . Page 2 of 2 LOS C F Approach delay I/ (s/veh) - -- 699.2 Approach LOS - -- F HCS2000TM Copyright 0 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Scttings\Temp\u2k6A24.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHR+A Agency/Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212312004 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Hour Protect Description Marathon Bank Intersection Route 50 &Ward Avenue Jurisdiction Winchester, VA Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions East/West Street: Route 50 North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 0 1382 23 268 2032 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate (veh/h) 0 1454 24 282 2138 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 0 -- -- 3 -- -- Median type Undivided RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 2 0 1 2 0 Configuration T TR L T Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume veh/h 102 0 188 0 0 0 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate veh/h 107 0 197 0 0 0 Proportion of heavy vehicles, PHv 3 0 3 0 0-T 0 Percent grade (%) 0 0 Flared approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized? 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Control Delay, Queue Length, Level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR Volume, v (vph) 282 304 Capacity, cm (vph) 447 8 v/c ratio 0.63 38.00 Queue length (95%) 4.25 39.86 Control Delay (s/veh) 25.8 17555 i file:HC:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A28.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 • Page 2 of 2 LOS D F Approach delay (s/veh) -- -- 17555 Approach LOS -- -- F HCS2000TM Copyright © 2003 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1d file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A28.tmp 2/3/2005 - HCS20W DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212812004 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 50 & Ward Avenue Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Marathon Bank - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, N, 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 Lane group L TR L T R L R L R Volume, V (vph) 109 1312 15 116 951 199 49 73 119 23 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, Ng 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only SB Only 07 08 Timing G= 15.0 1 G= 9.0 G= 28.0 G= G= 8.0 G= 15.0 G= G= Y= 5 IY= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 100.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 115 1397 122 1001 209 52 77 125 24 Lane group capacity, c 508 2107 263 1407 674 140 361 510 549 v/c ratio, X 0.23 0.66 0.46 0.71 0.31 0.37 0.21 0.25 0.04 Total green ratio, g/C 0.29 0.42 0.15 0.28 0.43 0.08 0.23 0.15 0.35 Uniform delay, di 27.0 23.3 38.8 32.4 18.7 43.6 31.2 37.5 21.5 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.24 0.11 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Incremental delay, d2 0.2 0.8. 1.3 1.7 0.3 1.7 0.3 0.3 0.0 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 27.2 24.1 40.1 34.1 19.0 45.3 31.5 37.8 21.5 Lane group LOS C C D I C 8 D C D C Approach delay 24.3 32.3 37.0 35.1 Approach LOS C C D D Intersection delay 28.8 X = 0.52 Intersection LOS C HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc Detailed Report 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS2000 DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 1212812004 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Route 50 & Ward Avenue Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Winchester Analysis Year 2007 Buildout Conditions Project ID Marathon Bank - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of lanes, Ni 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 0 1 2 0 1 Lane group L TR L T R L R L R Volume, V (vph) 109 1312 15 116 951 199 49 73 119 23 % Heavy vehicles, %HV 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Peak -hour factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A Start-up lost time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of effective green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial unmet demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking maneuvers, NM Buses stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. time for pedestrians, G 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only SB Only 07 08 Timing G= 7.0 G= 10.0 G= 24.0 G= G= 8.0 G= 16.0 G= G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= .5 Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= IY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted flow rate, v 115 1397 122 1001 209 52 77 125 24 Lane group capacity, c 428 2174 136 1340 697 156 261 605 488 v/c ratio, X 0.27 0.64 0.90 0.75 0.30 0.33 0.30 0.21 0.05 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k6A64.tmp 2/3/2005 Detailed Report 0 . Page 2 of 2 Total green ratio, g/C 0.08 0.27 0.24 0.43 0.61 0.09 0.17 0.18 0.31 Uniform delay, di 39.7 '32.0 30.6 24.0 7.2 39.8 34.2 35.9 22.8 Progression factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 Delay calibration, k 0.11 0.43 0.23 0.43 0.11 0.25 0.12 0.39 0.11 Incremental delay, d2 2.5 9.5 3.7 6.7 0.0 11.9 1.7 12.0 0.2 Initial queue delay, d3 Control delay 42.2 41.5 34.3 30.6 7.2 51.6 35.8 47.9 23.0 Lane group LOS D D C C A D D D C Approach delay 41.5 30.3 42.9 43.9 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection delay 36.0 X = 0.83 Intersection LOS D HCS2000TM Copyright © 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.1e file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\s2k6A70.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 0 Page 1 of 2 U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 2 0 36 43 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 2 0 37 45 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0 3 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 0 41 39 45 C (m) (vph) 1499 1562 1009 708 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.06 95% queue length 0.00 0.08 0.12 0.20 Control Delay 7.4 7.4 8.7 10.4 LOS A A A B Approach Delay -- -- 8.7 10.4 Approach LOS -- -- A g Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyapally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A2C.tmp 2/3/2005 Two -Way Stop Control 0 * Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst Agency/Co. Date Performed Analysis Time Period PHR+A PHR+A 1212312004 AM Peak Hour Intersection urisdiction nalysis Year Site Driveway &Ward Avenue Winchester, VA 2007 Buildout Conditions Project Description Marathon Bank East/West Street: Site Driveway North/South Street: Ward Avenue Intersection Orientation: . North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 0 65 4 43 86 156 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 0 68 4 45 90 164 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 -- -- 3 -- -- Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Westbound Eastbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 3 0 36 183 0 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 3 0 37 192 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 3 0- 3 3 0 3 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th and Level of Service Approach NB SB Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR LTR LTR v (vph) 0 45 40 192 C (m) (vph) 1305 1522 945 565 v/c 0.00 0.03 0.04 0.34 95% queue length 0.00 0.09 0.13 1.50 Control Delay 7.8 7.4 9.0 14.6 LOS A A A B Approach Delay - -- 9.0 14.6 Approach LOS -- -- A B Rights Reserved file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Boyap ally\Local%20Settings\Temp\u2k6A30.tmp 2/3/2005 Traffic Counts 0 L1 Intersection: E-W: ROUTE 50 Weather Dry File Name N-S: WARD AV Count By JJP lnput By JJP Location WINCIIESTER,VA Count Date 12/16/2004 15 Minute [:EB.ROUTE 50 WB: ROUTE 50 NB: WARD AV SB: 15 Min. Period NS,Period Begining Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Tota] Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 237 3 240 12 66 0 78 5 0 8 13 0 0 0 0 331 7:00 7:15 0 255 2 257 10 98 0 108 11 0 5 16 0 0 0 0 381 7:15 7:30 0 276 4 280 14 116 0 130 7 0 11 18 0 0 0 0 428 7:30 7:45 0 277 2 279 17 121 0 138 8 0 6 14 0 0 0 0 431 7:45 8:00 0 256 2 258 14 120 0 134 12 0 7 19 0 0 0 0 411 8:00 8:15 0 243 5 248 15 129 0 144 10 0 7 17 0 0 0 0 409 8:15 8:30 0 226 3 229 20 133 0 153 11 0 9 20 0 0 0 0 402 8:30 8:45 0 212 5 217 16 124 0 140 14 0 8 22 0 0 0 0 379 1 8:45 A.M. Total 0 1982 26 2008 118 907 0 1025 78 0 61 139 0 0 0 0 3172 11 A.M. Total 16:00 0 155 4 159 22 0 0 22 14 0 10 24 0 0 0 0 205 16:00 16:15 0 166 3 169 24 0 0 24 12 0 7 19 0 0 0 0 212 16:15 16:30 0 176 5 181 20 0 0 20 16 0 8 24 0 0 0 0 225 16:30 16:45 0 169 7 176 26 0 0 26 15 0 6 21 0 0 0 0 223 16:45 17:00 0 161 5 166 27 0 0 27 21 0 7 28 0 0 0 0 221 17:00 17:15 0 154 4 158 21 0 0 21 16 0 7 23 0 0 0 0 202 17:15 17:30 0 137 2 139 16 0 0 16 12 0 5 17 0 0 0 0 172 17:30 17:45 0 116 3 119 18 0 0 18 9 0 6 15 0 0 0 0 152 17:45 P.M. Total 0 1234 33 1267 174 0 0 174 115 0 56 171 0 0 0 0 1612 P.M. Total I Hour EB: ' ROUTE 50 WB: ROUTE 50 NB: WARD AV SB: 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 1045 11 1056 53 401 0 454 31 0 30 61 0 0 0 0 1571 7:00 7:15 0 1064 10 1074 55 455 0 510 38 0 29 67 0 0 0 0 1651 7:15 7:30 0 1052 13 1065 60 486 0 546 37 0 31 68 0 0 0 0 1679 7:30 7:45 0 1002 12 1014 66 503 0 569 41 0 29 70 0 0 0 0 1653 7:45 8:00 0 937 15 952 65 506 0 571 47 0 31 78 0 0 0 0 1601 8:00 16:00 0 666 19 685 92 0 0 92 57 0 31 88 0 0 0 0 865 16:00 16:15 0 672 20 692 97 0 0 97 64 0 28 92 0 0 0 0 881 16:15 16:30 0 660 21 681 94 0 0 94 68 0 28 96 0 0 0 0 871 16:30 16:45 0 621 18 639 90 0 0 90 64 0 25 89 0 0 0 0 818 16:45 17:00 0 568 14 582 82 0 0 82 58 0 25 83 0 0 0 0 747 17:00 1 Hour EB: ROUTE 50 WB: ROUTE 50 NB: WARD AV SB: I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:30 0 1052 13 1065 60 486 0 546 37 0 31 68 0 0 0 0 1679 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.95 PHF = 0.95 PHF = 0.89 PHF = 0.97 A.M. Peak 16:15 0 672 20 692 97 0 0 97 64 0 28 92 0 0 0 0 881 16:15 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.96 PHF = 0.90 PHF = 0.82 PHF = 0.98 1P M Peak Intersection: E-W: 7-11 Site Drive Weather DRY File Name N-S: Ward Ave Count By BRK Input By BRK Location Winchester,VA Count Date 12/22/2004 15 Minute EB: WB: 7-1 I Site Drive NB: Ward Ave SB: Ward Ave 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thou Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 8 10 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 10 20 7:00 7:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 11 0 0 2 2 11 0 0 11 24 7:15 7:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 19 7:30 7:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 9 17 7:45 8:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 10 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 18 8:00 8:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 15 8:15 8:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 5 0 0 1 1 7 0 0 7 13 8:30 8:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 6 14 8:45 A.M. Total 0 0 0 0 3 0 64 67 0 0 4 4 69 0 0 69 140 A.M. Total 16:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 9 11 0 0 1 1 12 0 0 12 24 16:00 16:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 1 1 9 0 0 9 20 16:15 16:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 12 20 16:30 16:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 9 10 0 0 2 2 10 0 0 10 22 16:45 17:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 8 15 17:00 17:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 10 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 7 17 17:15 17:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 8 9 0 0 1 1 8 0 0 8 18 17:30 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5 13 17:45 P.M. Total 0 0 0 0 4 0 69 73 0 0 5 5 71 0 0 71 149 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: WB: 7-11 Site Drive NB: Ward Ave SB: Ward Ave 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Lcft Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 36 38 0 0 3 3 39 0 0 39 80 7:00 7:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 37 38 0 0 3 3 37 0 0 37 78 7:15 7:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 32 33 0 0 1 1 35 0 0 35 69 7:30 7:45 0 0 0 0 1 0 27 28 0 0 2 2 33 0 0 33 63 7:45 8:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 29 0 0 1 1 30 0 0 30 60 8:00 16:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 36 39 0 0 4 4 43 0 0 43 86 16:00 16:15 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 35 0 0 3 3 39 0 0 39 77 16:15 16:30 0 0 0 0 1 0 34 35 0 0 2 2 37 0 0 37 74 16:30 16:45 0 0 0 0 2 0 34 36 0 0 3 3 33 0 0 33 72 16:45 17:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 33 34 0 0 1 1 28 0 0 28 63 17:00 1 Hour EB: WB: 7-11 Site Drive NB: Ward Ave SB: Ward Ave 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 0 0 0 2 0 36 38 3 0 0 .3 0 0 39 39 80 7:00 A.M. Peak PHF = PHF = 0.86 PHF = 0.38 PHF = 0.89 0.83 A.M. Peak 16:00 0 0 0 0 3 0 36 39 4 0 0 4 0 0 43 43 86 16:00 P.M. Peak PHF = PHF = 0.89 PHF = 0.50 PHF = 0.90 1 0.90 P.M. Peak Traffic Signal Warrant Study 0 0 Table A-1 (Based on Estimated Average Daily Traffic) Intersection Name: Route 50/ Ward Avenue EADT Major EADT Minor 43707 vpd 2178 vpd Urban: No Rural: Yes Minimum Requirements EADT Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher 1. Minimum Vehicular Warrant Satisfied street (total of both approaches) volume minor street (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Monor Street Urbmr Riral Urban R+rral 1 1 x 8,000 5,600 2,400 2178vpd 1,680 2 or more x 1 9,600 43707 vpd 6,720 2,400 1,680 2 or more 2 or more 9,600 6,720 3,200 2,240 1 2 or more 8,000 5,600 3,200 2,240 2. Interruption of Continuous Vehicles per day on major Vehicles per day on higher Traffic Warrant street (total of both approaches) volume minor street (one direction only) Number of lanes for moving traffic on each approach Major Street Monor Street Urban Rrrraf Urban Rrra/ 1 1 x 12,000 8,400 1,200 2178vpd 850 2 or more x 1 14,400 43707 vpd 10,080 1,200 850 2 or more 2 or more 14,400 10,080 1,600 1,120 1 2 or more 12,000 8,400 1,600 1,120 3. Combination 2 Warrants 2 Warrants No one warrant satisfied but following warrants fulfilled 80 % or more ❑ 1 ❑ 2 (') Major Street EADT-Total of Both Approaches (") Minor Street EADT- Higher Volume approach EADT=Estimated Average Daily Traffic Note: 1. Left turn movements from the major street may be included with minor street volumes if separate signal phase is to be provided for the left -turn movements 2. To be used only for NEW INTERSECTIONS or other locations where actual traffic volumes cannot be counted. auurce: rigure z- i u or me insmute or i ransponanon tngmeers' (I I t) Manual of traffic Signal Design Guidelines for Right -Turn Treatment 120 100 O 2 w °' 80 CO w J U W cii 60 z I- 0 40 EE n. 20 C-15 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 PHV APPROACH TOTAL, VEHICLES PER HOUR LEGEND PHV - Peak Hour Volume (also Design Hourly Volume equivalent) Adiustment for Right Turns For posted speeds at or under 70 km/h (45 mph), PHV right turns > 40, and PHV total < 300. Adjusted right turns - PHV Right Turns - 20 If PHV is not known use formula: PHV = ADT x K x D K = the percent of AADT occurring in the peak hour D = the percent of traffic in the peak direction of flow Note: An average of 11 % for K x D will suffice. GUIDELINES FOR RIGHT TURN TREATMENT (2-LANE HIGHWAY) FIGURE C-1-8 0 Marathon Bank— Route 50 West Rezonink II. IMPACT ANALYSIS HCS-2000 Worksheet • Di( 9 3 9 F'G 0 5 9 6 b� THIS DEED OF BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT made and dated N. BUCHER T' this 14th day of June, 1999, by and between CLAUDE M and DENNIS K. BUCHER, parties of the first part, hereinafter called I the Grantors, and JOHN K. HOLLIDAY, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantee. WHEREAS, the Grantors are the owners of a certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situate along the southern side of the Northwestern Grade and more particularly known and designated as Lots 5 & 6 of the Ward Avenue Lots; and being the some property devised to Claude N. Bucher and Denhis K. Bucher by the Will of Kathleen Margaret Bucher dated November 11, 1996 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia In Will Book. 109 at Page 1377; and WHEREAS the Grantee is the owner of a certain tract of land known as Lot 24, Ward Avenue Lots, and being the same property conveyed to John K. Holliday by Deed dated April 12, 1982 of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Book 546 at Page 637: WHEREAS the parties hereto desire to adjust the common boundary between the aforesaid Lots 5 & 6 and Lot 24, Ward 1 Bi1939FC0597 Avenue Lots as shown on the survey of Michael M. Artz, dated April 14, 1999, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof; i NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits that will accrue thereby and other good and valuable consideration, the Grantors do hereby grant and convey with general warranty of title unto the Grantee, in fee simple absolute, all that certain tract or parcel of land containing 200 sq. ft., and more particularly described and designated on the plat drawn by Michael M. Ariz, dated April 14, 1999, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as if set out in full; and being a portion of the some land devised to Claude N. Bucher and Dennis K. Bucher by Will of Kathleen Margaret Bucher dated November 1 1, 1996 of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Will Book 109 at Page 1377. The conveyance made herein shall be joined with the other land of the Grantee to establish a Lot containing 10,274 sq. ff. as shown on the aforesaid plat and the Grantee joins In the execution of this Deed to evidence his agreement that the within conveyed land shall be joined with and beco,;,e a part of his land known as 2 EI(939-G0598 Lot 24, Ward Avenue Lots. WITNESS the following signatures and seals: Claude N. Bucher JIAIt Ut- VIKU)NIA CITY of WINCHESTER, To-W[T: a Notary Public In and for the State and juns Iction aforesaid, o hereby certify that Claude N. Bucher and Dennis K. Bucher, whose names are signed to the foregoing Deed of Boundary Line Adjustment, dated the 14th day of June, 1999, has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the some in my State and jurisdiction aforesaid. Given under my hand this � day of June, 1999. My Commission expires - � .Q2� �� Ii.� . 4 '�� • c ONVv U'U OF 7: I 'L0T9�GI 3p ��U SK939PG0599 STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF WINCHESTER, TO -WIT: I a Notary Public in and for the State and juris - tion aforesaid, do hereby certify that John K. Holliday, whose name is signed to the foregoing Deed of Boundary Line i Adjustment, dated the 141" day of June, 1999, has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and jurisdiction aforesaid. Given under my hand this 14" day of June, 1999. My Commission expires _0'`. NOTARY OUBLIC c:\Mroocur,enls\ctID4T\aoY5Z\bucheMOWDAYbowdcryADJUSTMENLw wpcohi °�P ANN'�-,S,• . U�p�,ONWF9�-4 OF 2: , T� RY P Q 4 a • H939°60600 '`l SHEET 1 OF 4 BOUNDARY LINE ADJUSTMENT OF THE PROPERTY CONVEYED TO Claude N, Bucher & Dennis K. Bucher TNt #538-3-5, 6 WB 109, Pg 1377 AND THE PROPERTY — CONVEYED TO John K.' Holliday TM # 53B-3-24 pB 546, Pg 637 a April 14, 1999 Zoned RP Back Creek District, Frederick County, Virginia SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE: 1, Michadl M. Artz, a duly authorized land surveyor, do hereby mnify that the land hereby adjusted is in the name of Claude N. Bucher & Dennis K. Bucher, and John K. 800M Holliday and was aquired as stated in the Owner's Certificate. I further certify that these tracts are properly and accurately described are within the baun�dafry� Hof the original *racis. Certified Land Surveyor OWNER'S CERTIFICATE: The undersigned fee simple owners hereby certify that the land herein adjusted is a portion of the property conveyed to Claude N. Bucher & De:mis K. Bucher by will of Kathleen Margaret Bucher dated November 11, 1996 in Will Book 109 Page 1377; and all of the property conveyed to John K. INIUM Holliday by deed dated April 12, 1992 and recorded in Deed Book 546, Page 637. Said itian inects being of record in the Clerk's Office of Frederick Corn ty, Virginia. This Boundary Line Adjustment as it appears on the accompanying plats is with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the undersigned owner or agents thereof; of said land and the same is hereby confirmed and submitted for record in the Clerk's Office of Frederick County, Virginia. ' rrtauoe N. Bucher NOTARY CERTIFICATF,: STATE OF VIRGMA; CITY/CGL-4;:FY OF LL ink f.5 �r i�wit. no fotegm ers consent and dedicaticr was acborowledged before ma this %� u' day of 19 q�. My commission expires,; 0 9'1�zt ��iFi Dennis K. Bucher NOTARY CERTIFICATE; STATE OF VIRGINIA; CITY70GUNTY OF _x�i� `sf�y to -wit: The foregoing owners consent and dedication was acknowledged before me this /p �A day of Ta 19�• Notary Public �� . DK939PGO60I SHEET I OF4 NOTARY CERCA John K. Holliday I STATE OF VIFGi1VIA; C /GQUN-7PY OF W I'► C r S }- - , to-wrt The fnregom, ers consent and dedication Ras aclmowledged before me this day of My amunission e=ires 350t" 17) Notary Public GlQi CERTIMA`IE OR APPROVAL This Boundary Line Adjustneut is approved by the undersigned m accordance with cusimg subdivision regulations and may be admiffed to record. date Frederick County Subdivision A ish-ator BK939PG0603 SHEET 4 OF 4 The following is the metes and bounds description of a portion of Lots 5 & 6 of Ward Avenue Lots, located at the southwestem intersection of Northwestern Grade (U.S. Route 50) and Ward Avenue, in Back Creek District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being a portion of the property conveyed to Claude Nelson Bucher & Dennis Keith Bucher by will of Kathleen Margaret Bucher by dated November 11, 1996 and recorded in Will Book 109, Page 137T F BEGINNING at a point at -the southwestern intersection of Northwestern Grade (U.S. Route 50) and Ward Avenue; thence with the western right-of-way line of Ward Avenue S 19-44-26 W 230.77 feet to a p.k. nail set, a corner with a 10,200 square foot parcel; thence making a new line through Claude Nelson Bucher & Dennis Keith Bucher N 70-15-34 W 100.00 feet to a rebar set, a corner in the line of Lot 7; thence with Lot 7 N 19-44-24 E 208.63 feet passing through a rebar found at 206.61 feet to a point in the southern line of said Northwestem Grade, a point on a curve to the left and having a radius of 2976.79 feet; thence ,6th the are of said curve 102.43 feet with the right-of-way line of said road Long Chord S 82-44-21 E 102.42 feet to the beginning and CONTAINING 21,940 SQUARE FEET. SURVEYED APRIL 14, 1999. The following is a metes and bounds description of Lot 24 and a portion of Lots 5 and 6 of Ward Avenue, in Back Creek District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being all of the property conveyed to John K. 0111M Holliday by deed dated April 12, 1982 and recorded in Deed Book 546 Page 637 and a portion of the property conveyed to Claude Nelson Bucher & Dennis Keith Bucher by will of Kathleen Margaret Bucher by dated November 11, 1996 and recorded in Will Book 109, Page 1377. BEGINNING at a p.k. nail set in the western right-of-way line of Ward Avenue, a comer to a 21,940 square foot parcel, a new comer to Claude Nelson Bucher and Dennis Keith Bucher; thence with said right-of-way line S 19-44-26 W 2.00 feet to a p.k. nail found, a corner to Lot 24; thence S 1948-08 W 50.00 feet to a rebar set, a comer to Lot 25, thence with said lot N 70-15-34 W 199.99 feet to a rebar set in the line of Ralph W. Poe; thence with said Poe N 1947-35 E 50.00 feet to a rebar set, a comer to Lot 8; thence with Lot 8 in part and with Lot 7 S 70-15-34 E 100.00 feet to a rebar found, a corner to Lot 7 and Lot 6; thence with Lot 7 N 19-44-24 E 2.00 feet to a rebar set; thence making a new line through Lot 6 and 5 with said 21,940 square foot parcel S 70-15-34 E 100.00 feet to the point of beginning. CONTAINING 10,200 SQUARE FEET. SURVEYED APRIL 14, 1999.�`1 VIRG*M FROXMCK COUNnc tL u MICHAL"L tvt. ARTZ � This instrument of writing was duced to m on 1'1e �_yof r' 19�,at � annexes; No.1931 and with canlfl ate of acknowledgment thereto to record. Tax Imposed by boc_ 4d.1-802 of �Q,1`� n�¢/,a_d_m��itted t �St7.—, and li8.1-80t have bean paid, if assessable. 3ti� 1%tiO� Y' 0? GJ co W 40001tas, THIS DEED, dated this 3V day of r, 2004, by and between DENNIS K. BUCHER and PEGGY S. BUCHER, husband and wife, hereinafter called the Grantors, and CHRISTOPHER G. FRANCIS and SUSAN E. FRANCIS, husband and wife, hereinafter called the Grantees, WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors do hereby grant and convey, with General Warranty and English covenants of title unto the Grantees, in fee simple, as tenants by the entireties, with right of survivorship as at common law, all the following described certain real estate: All those two certain parcels of land (PIN 53B-3-7 and 53B-3-8) lying and being situate along the western side of Ward Avenue, a short distance west of Winchester, in Back Creek District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being the same parcels of land identified as Lot 7 and Lot 8 on the plat of Ward Avenue Lots, which is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 202, at Page 267; and more particularly described by plat and survey by H. Bruce Edens, L.S., dated May 2, 2002, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office with the next referenced Deed. These are the same properties Conveyed to the Grantors herein by Deed dated July 22, 2002 from Harry R. Hodgson, Guardian and Conservator of Boleyn V. Hodgson, of record in the aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No. 020007589. Reference is hereby made to the aforesaid instruments and the references therein contained for more particular descriptions of the property hereby conveyed. This conveyance is made subject to all easements, rights of way and restrictions `""rO" CARM of record, affecting the subject property. I32 S. C ST WMct6tMtk VA CD W co WITNESS the following signatures and seals: -�-�-- (SEAL) D ENNIS K. BU HER 6"� 64'_142 (SEAL} PE . BUCH- R STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY OF WINCHESTER, to -wit: Acknowledged before me this 0 day of k , 2004, by Dennis K. Bucher and Peggy S. Bucher. My commission expires: I 3/-04 M F rpzvo /' !!k. '�, , RNA15 V1R(31NIA MEDERtCK COUNTY, SC - This instrument of writing was produced to me On l +�" at�QB P d witti� c� �` to rc_�td inor iluszs d by 5c cr5g.1-802 of an was atlraltt $ /6�, 0� ,and 58.1-801 have tyeen paid, if assessable LAw OFFKTS GRoves & WCARTHY 132 S. CAmuon Sr. 4_1� (a} WmcHEm k VA i, , 1 0 I W, .N This Deed, made and dated this _ L, day of September, 2004, by and between DENNIS KEITH BUCHER and PEGGY S. BUCHER, husband and wife, hereinafter called the Grantors, parties of the first part; and THE MARATHON, BANK, a banking corporation, hereinafter called the Grantee, party of the second part Witnesseth: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors hereby grant and convey, with General Warranty and English covenants of title unto the Grantee, in fee simple, all the following described real estate; All that certain land in Back Creek District, Frederick County, Virginia, containing 21,940 sq. ft., lying on the south side of U.S. Route 50 west of Winchester, designated as Lot 5 (PIN 53-B-5) and Lot 6. (PIN 53-B-6) on the plat of Ward Avenue Lots, which is of record in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 202 at page 267 et seq.; less and except that parcel conveyed to John K. Holliday by deed of boundary line adjustment dated June 14, 1999, of record in said clerk's office in Deed Book 939 at page 596. These are the same properties conveyed to the Grantors herein by deed dated January 2001 by the devisees of Kathleen M. Bucher, of record in said clerk's office as Instrument No. 010000765. cy, E 0 0 C-, Reference is hereby made to the ' aforesaid instruments and the attachments and the references therein contained for a more particular description of the property hereby conveyed, This conveyance is made subject to all easements, rights of way acid restrictions of record affecting the subject property. In Witness Whereof we have set our signatures and seals: A"I" (SEAL) At��PEGGY S. BUCHER (SEAL) DENNIS KEITH BUCHER STATE OF VIRGINIA, CITY OF WINCHESTER, to -wit: Acltno'wledged before me this J day of September, 2004, by DENNIS KEITH BUCHER and by PEGGY S. BUCHER. My commission expires: I - 30' 0-� NOTA PUBLIC VIRGINIA-. FREDERICK COUNTY, SCT. This instrument of writing was produced to me on -�_ at y 3 M and with ccrti irate cif acknowledgement thereto nrtnexed was admitted to record. T imposed by Sec. 58.1-80Z of $ 4qo�� 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessable 44404 A'4 , Clark 05t )0034ss THIS DEED made and dated this q �y of , 2005, by and between CIMSTOPHER G. FRANCIS and SUSAN E. FRANCIS, husband and wife, parties of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantors; and THE MARATHON BANK, party of the second part, hereinafter called the Grantee. WITNESSETH: That for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), cash in hand paid and other good and valuable consideration, receipt whereof is acknowledged, the Grantors do hereby grant and convey with general warranty and English covenants of Title, unto the Grantees, in fee simple, as tenants by the entireties, with the common law right of survivorship together with all rights, rights of way, privileges, improvements thereon and appurtenances thereto belonging, all of the following realty: All of those two (2) certain contiguous lots or parcels of land, lying and being situate along the Western side of Ward Avenue a short distance west of Winchester in Back Creek (formerly Shawnee) Magisterial District, Frederick County, Virginia, and being the same parcels of land identified as Lots 7 and 8 on the plat of Ward Avenue Lots, which is recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Book 202, at Page 267; and further described by that certain plat and survey made by H. Bruce Edens, L. S., dated May 2, 2002 recorded in said Clerk's Office attached to the deed next hereinafter mentioned and incorporated herein as if set out in full. This is the same property conveyed to Christopher G. Francis and Susan E. Francis, husband and wife, from Dennis K. Bucher and Peggy S. Bucher, husband and wife, by Deed dated January 30, 2004 and recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Office as Instrument No. 040001588. Reference is hereby made to the aforesaid instruments and the attachments and the references therein contained for a more particular description of the property hereby LAW OP W !1MAS ), CHASLER conveyed. .1Tm We M.ET W1W.1x"ti t,n WITNESS the following signatures and seals: (SEAL) C��//H��R��ISTOPHER G. FRANCIS 1�L. C'2_Q,0 & AV(zili (SEAL) SUSAN E. FRANCIS STATE OF VIRGINIA CITY/C9UN-TY OF I Ivr p < �j , to -wit: � 1/ � I, _Sd , l ros id , a Notary Public in and for the State and jurisdiction aforesaid do hereby certify that CHRISTOPHER G. FRANCIS and SUSAN E. FRANCIS w hose n ames a re s igned t o t he f oregoing D eed, b caring d ate o f t he L L day of 2005, have personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this ' day of 12005. My commission expires SEAL AFFIXED ctary Public _:P; •�. VIRUINIA- FREDERICK COUNTY, SCT. This instrument of writing was Produced to me on cOy' •• •• Mr s and with certificate of acknowiedgement thereto annexed was admitted to record. T imposed by Sec 58.1-802 of 5 "od ... _ . and 58.1-801 have been paid, if assessablc Clerk a m c., LOT 24 53B-3-24 0 ✓OHN HOLLIDA Y S N 7p365O. W BOARD FENCF NE lOd 4' f IRF Mi !J c LOTS 7 & 8 ry�53B-3-7, 8 LABAN R. HODGSON do BOLEYN HODGSON ry ry DB 501 PG 1 LOTS 5&s 0.4653 ACRES 538-3-5, 6 OARD FENCE LINE BUCHER INST. hv 990006665 53—A-82 DARLA POE FUNKHOUSER AVE STORY FRAME � SHARON S POE STUCCO R BLOCK BUKDlNC �u DB 394 PG 121 D{{EZL/NC 5.1 ' 34.2206> YN p 52.3 1 F I 20. 0 8.1' ! 3.0' f t�P ORC11 i ORCN I Ilk (I WALK j STONEwIAiHWG �MrtRE FENCE UNE BENT IRF ® 4.0 A=102- /J IRS R-2976.79' IRS No7ES.. NORTHWESTERN GRADE 1. NO 7777 E REPORT FURNISHED. US ROUTE 50 2. PROPERTY IDEN77F7CA 770N NO. 5TB—.%-7, 8 160 ' R/W 3. WPP — Wt700 POWER POLE � U.S. ROUTE 50 IRF — IRON ROD FOUND -� IRS — IRON ROD SET YH — YARD HIDRANT A4LP — METAL LIGHT POLE GRAPHIC SCALE 4. BOUNDARY /NFORMA7701V SHOWN HEREON IS 40 0 IF +o ao BASED ON AN ACTUAL FIELD SURVEY MADE ON APRIL 25, 2002 ORIENTED TO PLAT OF SURWY �� _ 40 tt DATED APRIL 14, 1999 BY MICHL AL M. ARTZ L. S 1D 4119 BOUNDARY SURVEY ON LOT 7 & LOT 8 WARD A VENUE L 0 TS 2061 NLI4TF KSMW PIKE BACK CREEX MAQS0?1AL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, KRGIAIIA DATE MAY 2, 2002 SCALE.- 1 -40' TH OF �O U 9 H.H. Bruce No. 000162—B 4 l'ND sultlisA C�STREET & LEGGE WI �IM Land Surveyors, P.L.C. PHONE (640) 667-0468 FAX (640) 667-0469 OAF 9 0 V• Marathon Bank — Route 50 West Rezoning SURVEY PLAT & DE E D 0 • Marathon Bank —Route 50 West Rezoning V IS TAX TICKET Date: 3/22/05 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:49:29 CHER LINEAWMWER wasamliffso OOOOyqW56 Cust.Transactsons: Trans. Type: PAY Dept/Bi11#: RE2004 00038170002 P/I Date: 3/22/2005 0/22/2005 Name: THE MARATHON BANK Bi11 Date: 12/06/2004 Ha1T: Name 2: Address: Map#: f53B 3 6 4095 VALLEY PIKE MMMMMDDSSLLLLS WINCHESTER. VA Acreage: .25 Dist/C1s 01 / 02 Zip: 22602 - 0000 Mortg.Co. : De so: .25 ACRE SSN: 000 - Q4 - 0000 000 - 00 - 0000 Status: Land: S27,200 Improve: SO Use: SO Original Bi11: S99.28 Credits: 599.28 Discount: S.00 .............................................................................. Date Type Dra we r Tra ns# check N um be r Trans, Amount Ba 1a nce 12/00/2004 CHG S99.28 S99.28 10/29/2004 PAY AFW 16321 MARA 35579 $99.28CR S.00 F3=Exit F13=Comments/Value/ReTund Reason Date: 3/22/05 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:49:55 Tra®CHER LINEAWEAVER 000014157 Cust.Transactions: ype: PAY Dept/Bill#: RE2004.00038-130001 P/I Date: 3/22/2005 3/22/2005 Name: FRANCI:S CHRISTOPHER G & SUSAN E Bi11 Date: 6/06/2004 Ha1T: Name 2: Address: Map#: P03 nusKwOOD LN GORE VA Zip: 22637 - 2513 Desc: 25 ACRE M MMM MDDSSL L L LS Acreage: .25 Dist/C1s 01 / 01 Mortg.Go.: SSN : O O O - QQ - 9004 000 - 00 - 0000 Status: Land: S27,500 Improve: S77,100 Use: SO Original Bill: S381.79 Credits: S381.79 Discount: S.00 Date Type Drawer TransCheck Number Trans. Amount Balance 6/06/2004 CHG 5381.79 S381'79 6/02/2004 PAY CWO 13801 TRANSAM VAR S381.79CR $.00 F3=Exit F13=Comments/Value/ReTund Reason Date: 3/22/05 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:50:03 °= CHER LINEAWEAVER 000014157 Cust.Transactions: Trans. Type: PAY Dept/Bill#: RE2004 00038130002 P/I Date: 3/22/2005 3/22/2005 Name: FRAM I HRI TOPH R & AN E Bi11 Date: 12/06/2004 Ha1.T: 2 Name 2: Address: Map#: 53B 3 7 200 DUSKWOOD LN GORE. VA Zip: 22637 - 0000 Desc. .25 ACRE MMMMMDOSSLLLLS Acreage: .25 Dist/C15 01 / 02 Mortg.Co_: 022 FIRST AMERICAN RE TAX SSN: 000 - 00 - 0000 000 - Q-Q - 0000 Status: Land: S27,500 Improve: S77,100 Use: SO Original Bi11: $381.79 Credits: S381.79 Discount: S.00 Date Type Drawer Tr-anzi Q13ocK Number- Trans. Amoun-t Ralance 12/06/2004 CHG 5381.79 $381.79 11/00/2004 PAY CWO 13817 1STAM VARIOUS S381.79CR S.00 r:i=Exit F13=C0mments/Va3-ue/ReTund Reason Date: 3/22/05 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:40:41 Adob CHER LINEAWEWLR 00001JW5 Cust.Transactions: Trans_ Type: PAY Dept/Bill#: RE2004 0003$160001 P/I Date: 0/22/2005 3/22/2005 Name: BUCHER DENNIS KEITH & PEGGY S Bill Date: 6/06/2004 Halt: ti Name 2: Address: Map#: 50a 3 5 182 MARPLE RE) MMMMMDDSSLLLLS WINCHESTER. VA Acreage: .25 Dist/C1s 01 / 01 Zip: 22603 - 4141 Mortg.Cc>.: Desc: 25 ACRE SSN: OOO - 000 - 0000 000 - 00 - 0000 Status: Land: S54,500 Improve: S120,000 Use: SO Original 6111: S636.93 Credits: SG36.93 Discount: S.00 ............................................................. ................ Date Type Drawer Trans # ChecK Number Trans. Amount Balance 6/06/2004 CHG S636.93 5636.93 5/19/2004 PAY LBX 92201 BOC 4357 S636.93CR S.00 F3=Exit F13=Comments/Value/Re'fund Reason Date: 3/22105 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:48:56 CHER LINEAWEAVER . 000014155 Cust.Transactions: Trans. Type: PAY Dept/Bill#: RE2004 00038160002 P/I Date: 0/22/2005 3/22/2005 Name: THE MARATHON BANK Bill Date: 12/06/2004 Hall: Q Name 2: Address: Map#: SOB 3 5 4095 VALLEY PIKE WINCHESTER. VA Zip: 22sn2 - 0000 Desc: .25 ACRE MMMMMDDSSLLLLS Acreage: .25 Dist/C1s 01 / 02 Mortg.Co. : SSN: 000 - OTC - 0000 000 - 00 - 0000 Status: Land: $54,500 Improve: $120,000 Use: S0 Original Bill: 5636.92 Credits: S636.92 Discount: S.00 ..................................................................... Date Type Drawer TransChecK Number Trans. Amount Balance 12/06/2004 CHG S636.92 S636.92 10/29/2004 PAY AFW 16321 MARA 35579 S636.02CR S.00 F3=Exit F13=Comments/Value/ReTund Reason Date: 3/22/05 - COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:40:20 CHER LINEAWEAVER .5s 00001416 Cut.Trransactions: Tra®ype: PAY Dept/Bill#: RE200400035170001 P/I Date: 3/22/2005 3/22/2005 Name: nUCHER. DENNIS KEITH & PEGGY S Bi11 Date: 6/06/2004 Hal:: Name 2: Address: Map#: 53B 3 6 102 MARPLE RD MMMMMDDSSLLLLS WINCHESTER VA Acreage: .25 Dist/Cls 01 / 01 Zip: 22603 - 4141 Mortg.Co.: Desc: 25 ACRE SSN: 000 - 00 - 0000 000 - 00 - 0000 Status: Land: 527,200 Improve: $O Use: SO Original Bill: S99.28 Credits: S99.28 Discount: S.00 • Date Type Drawer Trans# ChecK Number Trans Amount Balance 6/06/2004 CHG S99.2S 599.25 5/19/2004 PAY LBX 92201 BOC 4357 S99.28CR S.00 F3= Exit F13=Comments/value�ne�ui Date: 3/22/05 COUNTY OF FR IE�-DERICK Time: 14:50:36 •L.�� CHER LINEALIJWVER Rom- 00001W85 Cust. Transactions: Trans. Type: PAY Dept/Bi11#: RE2004 00038140001 P/I Date: 0/22/200S 0/22/2006 Name: FRANCIS CHRISTOPHER G 8. SUSAN E Bi11 Date: 6/06/2004 Ha1rt: 1 Name 2: Address: Map#: 53B 3 8 203 DUSKWOOD LN MMMMMODSSLLLLS GORE. VA Acreage: .25 Dist/Cls 01 / 01 Zip: 22637 - 2513 Mortg.Cc>.: Desc: .25 SSN: 000 - 00 - 0000 LOT 8 WARD AVE 000 - 00 - 0000 Status: Land: S4, 000 Improve: SO Use: s0 Original Bi11: S14.60 Credits: 514.60 Discount: S.00 ...................... ........................ Date Type Drawer Trans# ChecK Number Trans. Amount Balance 6/06/2004 CHG 514.60 514.60 6/02/2004 PAY CWO 13501 TRANSAM VAR 514.60CR S.00 F3= Exit F13=Comments/Value/Rertund Reason Date: 3/22/05 COUNTY OF FREDERICK Time: 14:50:45 CHER LINEAWEAVER •WNUM 000040685 Cust.Tvansactions: Trans. Type: PAY Dept/Bi11#: RE2004.00038140002 P/I Dater 0/22/2005 3/22/2005 Name: FRANC.IS_ CHRIUTOPHER G & SUSAN E 13i11 Date: 12/06/2004 Ha1Y: 2 Name 2: Address: Map#: ti3B 3 8 200 DUSKWOOD LN MMMMMOOSSLLLLS CORE VA _ Acreage: .25 Dist/C1s 01 / 02 Zip: 22637 - 0000 Mortg.Cc>.: 022 FIRST AMERICAN RE TAX De sc : .25 SSN : QQQ - QQ - 0 0 0 0 LOT 8 WARD AVE 000 - QQ - 0000 Status: Land: 54,000 Improve: s0 Use: SO Original Bi11: $14.60 Credits: 514.60 Discount: 5.00 ............................................................................. Date Type Drawer Trans# Check Number Trans. Amount Balance 12/06/2004 CHG 514.60 $14.60 11/30/2004 PAY CWO IOSI7 1STAM VARIOUS s14.60CR 5.00 F3=Exit F13=Comments/Value/ReY'und Reason COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: June 14, 2005 The amount of $50.00 was deposited in line item #3-010-0191 TO-0008 for Marathon Bank. The company had a deposit for one sign for Rezoning #05-05. Marathon Bank has returned the sign and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. Please send a check in the amount of $50.00 to: Marathon Bank PO Box 998 Stephens City, VA 22655 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 Patton H arris Rust $ Associates,pc Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 117 East Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 PH11AWinchester, Virginia22601 T 540.667.2139 F 540.665.0493 0 MAR 2 5 2W5 Transmittal To: Organization/Company: Address: Telephone Number: Date: From: Project Name/Subject: Via: Eric Lawrence Frederick County Planning Department 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 540-665-5651 25 March 2005 Chris Mohn Submissions for April 20`h PC Agenda Internal Project File #: Quantity File # Date Description Transmitted Rezoning Apphcation Packet for Marathon 1 Bank -Route 50 West Rezoning Application Fee for Marathon ® Herewith 1 Bank -Route 50 West (Check$3,150) ❑ Under separate cover Request for Limited Access Break 1 Endorsement — Kernstown Commons Material Attachment - Request for Limited Access Break Endorsement — Kernstown ® Originals 69 Commons ❑ Photocopies ❑ Diskette ❑ Shop Drawings ❑ Mylar ❑ Ozalid Prints ❑ Invoice ❑ Sepia Purpose Notes: ® Approval ❑ Please Return: Corrected Prints ❑ Please Submit: Revised Prints Received by: Date: Document Approval Form MAR 2 5 2M PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHA T YOU WOULD LIKE TO HA VE COMPLETED. INITLkLS DATE & TIME Candice David Mark Susan Eric , V COMMENTS: r lo,e- ire Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): • • REZONING APPL ICA TION MARATHON BANK US ROUTE 50 MARCH 2O05 MAR Z 5 2005 _I P»rani Dr Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Picadlly St Winchester, Virginia 22601 V010E (540) 667-2139 FAX: (540) 665-0493 Frederick County, Virginia REZONING APPLICATION MATERIALS FOR REZONING REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF THE MARATHON BANK - ROUTE 50 WEST PROPERTY Back Creek Magisterial District March 2005 Prepared by: Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc 117 E. Piccadilly Street Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone:540-667-2139 Fax:540-665-0493 P�J RI� • Marathon Bank —Route 50 West Rezonine Table of Contents I. Application II. Impact Analysis III. Proposed Proffer Statement IV. Agency Comments V. Survey Plat and Deed VI. Tax Ticket 52 q Alf COMMONWFgLTHGR0 JOHNSOry3ry A 75 ANCYRENNER • Y►7NCNFSTFR JOHry53 A SOH r B2 N NNf NCYRF R T. ,; z ts co A C � •�• 53 A 68 m ORO(/p,N �NFSTER •WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER iNC p v _ ..,. 53 A 76 JOHNSON, ROBERT B. • n 1 . 1 1 • I I • 50 • • 50 • Q Q Q � Q a hA P Q m e m s 0 Q �' `•' Cis 4Q ll,2 1 • 1317 -O° y^ J54� • HOIIIDAY3JO 3 24 HN O yti�yti �J2 �4O K d JUNE S • by PHTH pS38 3 25 ERTIES, FARMERS t, 53 3 70 PQ� VES TOCK «C • I EXC H ANGE,IryC 53 WOLFORD, CU 3 26 Y W. B ARMITHA 538 COMBS, ryANCI L KOIFORDS�43 $7ARM/THA �• Map Features /\/ Bridges 0 P.—I, 8wrcaoon ^/ Cu _r LakeslPonds /V Dams AaricuAur.l a Forestal Dlstich w— streams /V R—1, Walls - Nut. Church ElWd,rgs Road Centerlines - Romp. Church N - Tanks IV ® S.0 Frederick /V W - f( ��. Treils S REZ # 05 - 05 Marathon Bank ( 53B - 3 - 5,6,7,8 ) 0 75 150 300 Feet D fT ti Adjoining Property Owners TO: Barbara - Data Processing FROM. Bev. PI ning Dept Pleas p t sets of labels by: ° THMS111 Rezoning p Owners of property adjoiningthe land will be notified of the Planning Commission andrthe Board g of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2"d floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Address Property Identification Number (PIN) Name: Winchester Medical Center, Inc. P.O. Box 1334 Property #: 53-A-68 Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Darla P. Funkhouser & Sharon S. Poe 272 Hilda Drive Property #: 53-A-82 Clearbrook, VA 22624 Name: Farmers Livestock Exchange, Inc. P.O. Box 2696 Property #: 53B-3-1 Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Robert B. Johnson 2054 No. Pike Property #: 53-A-76 Winchester, VA 22603 Name: John K. & June S. Holliday 111 Ashton Drive Property #: 53B-3-24 Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Name: Property #: ,�3 - .4 - 6 S Name: Property #: S3 L - ? — to Name: Property #: Name: Property #: 61 41 3o 7 DEPT. OF GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS FREDERI�K COUNTY, VIRGINIA W E GIS, MAPPING, GRAPHICS WORK REQUEST DATE RECEIVED: A 4 REQUESTED COMPLETION DATE: REQUESTING AGENT: Department, Agency, or Company:_ Mailing and/or Billing Address: Telephone: E-mail Address: ESTIMATED COST OF PROJECT: FAX: DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: (Write additional info ' uest CaLO,e G- Oe-47a,v IY► A PS b ,6--o S ��. 4.'S -57� 3 6:57 4g' P. 'S 3B 3-S6 5 DIGITAL: PAPER: FAX: E-MAIL: -_._.__ � SIZES: COLOR: BLACK/WHITE: NUMBER OF COPIES: STAFF MEMBER HOURS REQUIRED: COMPLETION DATE: MATERIALS: DATE OF PICK-UP/DELIVERY: AMOUNT DUE: AMOUNT BILLED: METHOD OF PAYMENT: AMOUNT PAID: CHECK NO.# Frederick County GIS, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-565I) COUNTY of FRL, DERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING April 27, 2005 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #05-05 FOR MARATHON BANK On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, May 11, 2005, at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #05-05 for Marathon Bank, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC, to rezone 1.0 acre from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (General Business) District. The properties are located on the south side ofNorthwestern Pike (Route 50 W), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route 1317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 Interchange, in the Back Creek Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers (PINs) 5313-3-5, 5313-3-6, 5313-3-7, and 5313-3-8. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the hearing, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, ly, 'IT Susan K. Eddy Senior Plamler SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 C�? This is to certi that the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on d�-from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 53B • 3- • 24- 53B - 3- - 5- THE MARATHON BANK 4095 VALLEY PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22602-2464 Patton Harris Rust Associates, PC Attn: Charles Maddox 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 fie 53 - A- - 68- WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC PO BOX 1334 WINCHESTER, VA 22604-7834 53 - A- - 82- FUNKHOUSER, DARLA POE & POE, SHARON S 272 HILDA DR CLEARBROOK, VA 22624.1475 53B - 3- - 1- FARMERS LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE,INC PO BOX 2696 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1896 53 -A- - 76- JOHNSON, ROBERT B. 2054 NORTHWESTERN PIKE WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.3947 HOLLIDAY, JOHN K & JUNE S 111 ASHTON OR WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4319 Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK 1, , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hloeby certify that Su n K. Eddy, Senior Planner for the D partment of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated �--6 , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State anA County aforesaid. Given under my hand this jj yjday of Joe My commission expires on !(.C2—. 0 ,(--V s— In6- 6 7� Ho1c) B1,-I ti,- Adjoining Property Owners Rezoning TO: Barbara - Data Processing FROM: Bev - PI nning Dept. Pleas print sets of labels by: LO THANKS111 Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Address Property Identification Number (PIN) Name: Winchester Medical Center, Inc. P.O. Box 1334 Property #: 53-A-68 Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Darla P. Funkhouser & Sharon S. Poe 272 Hilda Drive Property #: 53-A-82 Clearbrook, VA 22624 Name: Farmers Livestock Exchange, Inc. P.O. Box 2696 Property #: 53B-3-1 / Winchester, VA 22604 Name: Robert B. Johnson 2054 Northwestern Pike Property #: 53-A-76 ✓ Winchester, VA 22603 Name: John K. & June S. Holliday 111 Ashton Drive Property #: 53B-3-24 ✓ Winchester, VA 22603 Name: Prop efty-# -- Name: Property #: 6 ,,.�. •/ Name: y Property #: - Name: Property #: Name: Property #: F COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING April 6, 2005 TO: THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #05-05 FOR MARATHON BANK On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, April 20, 2005, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 405-05 for Marathon Bank, submitted by Patton Harris Rust & Associates, PC, to rezone 1.0 acre from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (General Business) District. The properties are located on the south side of Northwestern Pike (Route 50 W), west and adjacent to Ward Avenue (Route L317), approximately 900 feet west of the Route 37 Interchange, in the Back Creek Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers (PINS) 53B-3-5, 5313-3-6, 53B-3-7, and 53B-3-8. Any interested parties having questions or wishing to speak may attend this public hearing. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the hearing, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner SKE/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify th t the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 53B - 3- - 24- 53B - 3- - 5 HOLLIDAY, JOHN K & JUNE S THE MARATHON BANK ���%� 111 ASHTON DR 4095 VALLEY PIKE WINCHESTER, VA 22603.4319 WINCHESTER, VA 22602.2464 Patton Harris Rust Associates, PC Attn: Charles Maddox 117 E. Piccadilly Street, Suite 200 Winchester, VA 22601 53 - A- - 68- WINCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER, INC PO BOX 1334 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.7834 53 - A- - 82- FUNKHOUSER, DARLA POE & POE, SHARON S 272 HILDA DR CLEARBROOK, VA 22624.1475 53B - 3- - 1- FARMERS LIVESTOCK EXCHANGE,INC PO BOX 2696 WINCHESTER, VA 22604.1896 53 - A- - 76- JOHNSON, ROBERT B. 2054 NORTHWESTERN PIKE Susan K. Eddy, Senior Plan ner WINCHESTER, VA. 22603.3947 Frederick County Planning Dept. STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK I, , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do reby certify t rat Susa K. Eddy, Senior Planner for the Dep w to nt of Planning and Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated IV� , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this � day of 6�' 0 D� My commission expires on az�'S Is a ;