Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout017-05 Russell-Gelndobbin Letters - Backfile1'79 ,o��. -�" ✓,max, a-e-- , Judy Rus 2619 Woods,*. FM Clear Brook, VA 22624 of 1�7 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Cn R March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re. Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision .gear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager, T would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the UDA area. so it is an obvious area for growth. Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, l l 3—�A.K-•� ,�.v�.c l� 2. vx c Fred -crick �.�n-�-�� 1� ArinInC �\j ,n c hes` ev , v A J J (col (CO r March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zeroi Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come. in and build house, using out of town people and moterials_ The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, �.� \ . - U . , . . . & U64 cool till.: iii! di"! it . March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr_ Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"► Sincerely, �Y `s,, R Jo/ IN, Emil _ , „ , j, J, , , , j j, , ,t j, „ j GJ..'��='�1:?'=� ii!f!i!i(!I!1(!!Ii!!III INILI I H!!!!! filll l!!jf!!!i!!! id! I!! March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes'1 Sincerely, of PV 1 c IC n o r 9-1 1 /`\ ,' vi + v e e wl I(I c 11e-S+eir , VA Da (c(II March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: should ezone ground On April 5th, you will hold a meetthe Russells to be able toing to decide wheer udeveloprThis ground is in of Glendobbin Road in ordero the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, � � C fval t � Q h /l ( n) CCU rvI I S S i on -A /o '-7 NcX 4-k Wirictl(S4. i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �Yfit. FrLl-LS i ! 11: if if til if! I I! i ;I i..!Ii I If i If! if ld.-i March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Comraission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager, I would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for nialy years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the UDA area, so it is an obvious area for growth, Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �. hSFR in 2not• (OUh�kj —Plavi ") Ccr m f" nory� K evl4 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kertt Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am lust a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, Y' 1 �(v U 1 �v%ct t vt 14 -)UgS PM o) Cc�eYC% Co. - lgn,,i,v) Cory-vior" �,for4h K c—n 4- S�re4f • -_- _ _ _ _ _ �f��f:f�=fsf;�f::1(�;:::;�1':t:t:!f;;=:;�l:l�;�:�fr��t�,�f:f:l:( V- March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager,1 would like to express my opinion on the request far rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the LTDA. area. so it is an obvious area for growth. Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So eve ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, I LLI March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely,�� A � 1�C� E v"o JV- March 25, 20% Frederick County Planning Commission 10.7 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April SN, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground Is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots Per acre. I believe Mr. Russell Is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, R D LLc LLC 133 West Boscawen St., Suite I Winchester, VA 22601 - - - - - -- - - - - -M: Ak:jij: i!j!!!':::!: ..... 1 .1.1.1 ... . .1 . 1.14.1 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5�h, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. Tbls ground Is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes Sincerely, Charles B Russell 133 Molden Dr Winchester VA 22601-5574 March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager, T would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the pound they wish to rezone is in the UDA area, so it is an obvious area for growth, Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sine y, A 1 --7 )pLE w NOR L Ti8 ti 133 W. Boscawen St., Suite #1 Winchester, VA 22601 �t/cu.c�uoo�, vim' �6a� I Z till IthHI3f iddalbi.Il?Rilll??lilF:i!fE11 IM March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA_ And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, im _ W,��c�,QS+�� w U. March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zerol bo they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials_ The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, ,jo-iiIII-Iji-I_, i / ' At c k Cc A n n csm rvl S S r cti, L)(heS�4,✓/ vP DZ)(r<i March. 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we fecal that the Russells should have the night to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, i �� - Lim °°�``- li MAR 3 0 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerer-, vLC� -a, �Z PM V- k a vrI ��l��l -!� --, -, n ; # -1 -:i -1 -13 1 1 Z- Z.. -.: -� Z . -..� , -..� L. i! ii:;J: it I it Mt. H Hdii: lit i! il! i! li I I I il it i! H i! H ii I d: i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, CIA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, `tYl �c~� .7- _ 7W- ci Z--7 4_ 3G ,�/2-inGfJ $ L' e- I U!nc tieS,�1,1 j-D&a a t 07 N,-, 4 , Kul- 5 C() �16�,,5`f,-C11U/r aaC:�o� iffififIifitlit ffit fftiIll! ififlit If! IH!IfiffIII ffifffifIfifi i March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it --_A- -,_ _ I _ , , n, be nice to Sincerely, it " voteYes! c: /I --) cda� 6 (). I Aal� -7 V-4 , / 4,/� / hj�, -- ='j = � = = = =ftt(tf::�titift:�ft:rtt:j�t�tltiittt:tll:lt(tt�(tttit::f:i:r:( March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Wlnchoster, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. 1 may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA_ And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. 1 can understand why this parcel may havo been put in the UDA at one time, since it Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What i don't understand is whim all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA issing something? I have to believe that our octal government delines? Am I nis fairer wi h our regulations than this. Please vote yes. t Sincerely, 1 O `j n o rre e \v„J , n c �1 Q S+ Cc 01 illid! ,i;ifii!, fi III!! III! is is i iii, i,i=:i ! i,,,i, i,id March 26, 2006 Fredcrick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. As a local business owner/manager, T would like to express my opinion on the request for We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they Wish to rezone is in the UDA area, so it is an obvious area for growth, Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, mp9pp-- (10 2-?— (o 9 / -7 L41 Al. Pf 'I ul March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Comruission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager, l would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the UDA area. so it is an obvious area for growth, Considering this ground is very Close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So eve ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, All F M 12- C March 28,2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Rusell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located in an area that is zoned UDA, and it also has water and sewer availability. From what I understand, that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since it isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about. If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, don't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, ( C) `? Ill G, % �' r -S IYc --- - - - - - =►�rl�lr:i!lrit!!i!!!rr!!(1:�!(:�f�r!!!if!t!i!:li:,!►!r;tll;f!t March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA_ And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may havo been put in the UDA at one time, since It isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What i don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is falrer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, i I cL Y(CIL Co P I ") co•Y�+�'� . f (J� 'Iv6 if rn Kp JA-Y -ecT �IY1Cl)eS4-P-►'f V 14 (ooI if: f!f!!r!ifH !=!r!!:!!!!hiiif1l!!!I I f!f!f'?tl!!!if, !i!!!fi! L March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 10.7 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5ch you will hold a meeting to decide whethor Of Glendobbin Rood in order for the Russells t be able to YOU should rezone ground off the UDq and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the Question should be t ground ground Is in allowed to be developed since it was set aside forgjust that. Wltti water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have Per acre. t believe Mr. Russell Is asking for 60 lots acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our to several lots which is equal to one lot per is fair enough to sec this and realize that even though neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their homecal government would that leave the Russells g some of the surroundhe next month. Where Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, � c14-4 .v W� fv 1- If March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: M9 3 1 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, cfwo 16k, March 28, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Be: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. 1 may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located in an area that is zoned IDA and it has water and sewer availability. From what I understand, that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the IIDA at one time, since it isn't far out of town and there is some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about. If the ground is in the iiDA and has water and sewer, don't the Russells have the right to build under the ITDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely Vifdev iCv_ cc,Tlla0n(k� Ic��. N. V-)cnL,a . LoLr)cr-c5t-v, VA �uu)l I!!I!TI!I!IlII!liTi!}e!sIf!IIIfII!!!!!II!I!I!!IIFlfIf!!I!I!`iI 0-omm. � March 28, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge. Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located in an area that is zoned UDA and it has water and sewer availability. From what I understand, that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the S acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since it isn't far out of town and there is some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about. If the ground is in the I1DA and has water and sewer, don't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, fy PM FrlcderiCL i�.1�L�nnu'r' Cam. icTi rl. IC.Q,t"c. (,Oi nc",5-h f I VA 0--ps cl, March 28, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester," 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located in an area that is zoned UDA and it has water and sewer availability. From what 1 understand, that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this pareel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since it isn't far out of town and there is some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about. If the ground is in the ITDA and has water and sewer, don't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, / Fft6cv'tc� Cc;p1 CLnnAl Cam lCq N. Ktni St V-�uncnc<5L(-yt VIA March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kont Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned cttlzen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA_ And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA issing something? I have to believe that our local government delines? Am I nfairer irer wi our regulations than this. Please vote yes. th Sincerely, I i i" If iii! fii.� .1 i ii i �t�.��{ �l ,)�iJiJ:Jt� '.tJ(tEJti � I; ,. _ .. , cr . �.:•: t•fi • w c�c.,t,n �U�L�ugJ - ���' �'�nJ � � ��� rJJ J J � S 5 �) e �,� J 17b 2) v March 28, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, " 22601 Be: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not. know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located in an area that is zoned IrDA and it has water and sewer availability. From what I understand, that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since it isn't far out of town and there is some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road. What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about. If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, don't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, Trtd-c�'�ct CC,,,,RaOnmj I oll n . Y-Crlt L��cr� �r, W\ ��sot March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbinx Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. La ,w P, n3 no,(� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Comm ision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since it Isn't that fat out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? 1 have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April Sth, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground Is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asldng for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, - e, toq ,-I WOC n P Frf4,or;cK Ca,,-,� u I Ai �emt C t v); n e h es +�v r I # March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. 1 may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Since r ly, z a � 67 (�s�sff�l�l:fa�►:I-.[did!illItill liliddf(sf March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 2260i Re. Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may havo been put in the UDA at one time, since it Isn't that far out of toAr'n and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? 1 have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. yy NF=l --ANN • . .......... PM Nlz n n 7 A �Y)"4 v "-4,44. . cj.,4"4.- r-"l— l! March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April Sch, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground Is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell Is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. l would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, • I !4 "dw 1, - March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 50, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell Is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. l would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, 6t� 37 W its oo' ol 10 7 r MAR 3 0 20C, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 10.7 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5u,, you will hold a me of Glendobbin Roodill h order for n to decide Whether the UD You should rezone ground oft A and the SWA13 area. As far as I Cantelleto deve ns thalt round in Question should be t This ground Is in Allowed to be developed since it was set aside lforgju t that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capabilityo Per acre. I believe Mr. Fussell Is asking for GO tots th ave several lots acre. That is a lot less than he could ask which is equal to one lot per is fair enough to see this and realize that for. f would hope that our some of the b lsurrogndinment even though neighbors may be against this, they may also sell theirhome n would that leave the Russells? ext month, Where Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, J ec 315 13 w"tJ4 , VA Cie � Ic K Lk il � c I r lo k1pi I rl) -) 6c 1114 c� rcyyl (YI ► S S / 6�,, t,pR 4 March 25, 2005 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Bent Street Winchestet, Va 22501 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground oft or +Glendobbin !load in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the S%VAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. (Alith �,vater and sevter availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less t€lan he could ask for. I would hope that our local gove, nment is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where �rrovld that leave the Russells? Piease do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Alt �E `"" nAA 4T\ E- rot Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 I•{ 25, 2005 Fvederick County Planning Commission •s 07 M bent Street IjIlhichestet, Va 22501 Rv: Giendlobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you unrilt 4-,old a meeting to decide whether yOU should rezone ground of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This grow Zd is i2L Me LIDA and the S�NAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the groa�id n question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. Rvater and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lets acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 50 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less tljan he could ask fos. I would hope that our local Bove-nrner'= iv rc 77 enough to see €his and realize taut even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next rrson' l�. V, eF- iRrQCgW that leave the Russells? Qiea n do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, U-a& c,-��.. PNI N. Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 - - -- - - - - - - - - Inq 4 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: should rezone grouna On April 5th, you Will hold a meeting to decide wheer the Russells to be able toudevelopf This ground is off of Glendobbin Road in order for the UDA and the Si,'1.1AB area. As far as t can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs! lots per acre.: believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right �Liiing and vote yes. Sincerely, k4 Frederick County Planning Comn"ssion 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On Anril 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SINAS area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs! lots i believe !►fir. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per per acre. acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where wovid that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, S w�� Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Nla� ch 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N bent Street Winchestet, Va 2260:1 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground o7 f of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the ti®A and the S` VAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. Wit"'3 water and server availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots ner acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 50 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. There would that leave the Pussells? Piease do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street ,Nhichestet, Ala 2260" Re: Gten-Jobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: A f-F �)rfl Fth' you jqffl- ;-,olw a meeting to decide whether yogi should rezone groLnd o of Glendoi�,%Wn Road in order for the Russells to be able TLO develop. T his ground is in tfhe UDA aijc-1 taze LPAIAD, area�\s far as I can tell that means that the ground in f question should be allowed to he developed since it was set aside for just -that- �-Vnth -ratev and se�rler availa,!,Nlity, it should also have the capability to have severa! lots -?" acre. z belie-,e F-lussell is asking for eO lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less f^18n hp, could asil for. I viould horpa that our iocal government nent is Tely enough to see this and realize that eve.1 t1lough some Of the surrounding neiL!Mors rinay be Agp'n Me ileyt Month. Where _ �,, C - s, this, they may also sell their he Me that leave 1.113 Russells? Pieas-- do the light thin and vote yes. Sincereiv, ��in A S6elly Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 :=li=r3r==rl,=,r:;:r=i�i=� P!Iarch 25, 2006 Fredevich County Planning Commission 107 N Ken'k a[reet WFAichestet, Va 22503 Re.: G. ,endcM)in Ridge Subdivision, Dear Genldeme_�: On Alarii 5,h, you Wili hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground c' o Glendobbin load in order for the Russells to Pie able to develop. This ground. is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in qLiestion should be allowed to he developed since it was set aside for gust that. t,Vit[: and se rPY a9�aila! ility, it should a, so ieave the capability to "gave seve_al lists acre. ; believe fin, _ l a�ssell is asking foy SO lofts, vihi�ch is equ I to one lot Per acre. That is a lot less t'`:lan he could ash nor. l ,P!ould hops that. our focal Bove •amen`= is fait enough to see This and realize that wren though sOMe of he surroundingF neighbors -may e against this, s33ey may also sell them ogre tie;C�i mor�sl. ,iroLoo! thaf' leave the Russells? Pjease do the Og5ht thh'14-Df 01,9d vote Yes. —� c Frederick COMY Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. 1 Sincerely, AW-.P- .. Frederick County planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 =•� = - -•- _ - :• = _ =•_' :f!!I!I!3I3�3,I33i13!3333it3til31133:33113(3t33jI3i3�33!13I31iI March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5ih, you will hold a meeo the Russells to be able to developFThis ground is inting to decide wheer you should ezone ground of Glendobbin Road in order the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, a p n Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 .'.'= = _�. � _ _•='1tF:Ift:Fl3liiIF31Ie3333f!{313fFiJF31ff1�:�!t33�t33!lF3FfFl:f°! March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t1,, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in orderfAs far as Russells an telltha tmea s that the ground n is in the UDA and the SWAB area question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Coninussion 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 lidd!ji„=,=jj=°=j,=jj,�:j�==i:i!I=j March 25, 2005 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22501— Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will bold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick Counh, Planning Commi 107 N Kent Street ssion Winchester, Va 226ol March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, I Frederick County planning 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 226o1 Commission r' P M March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: should ezone On April 5ih, you Will hold a meetithe Russells to be able tong to decide wheer udeveloprThis grounground off of Glendobbin Road in order for in the LIDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs! lots :,er acre..; believe !T�r. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order eafor the As far as Iscalnsto be ale to develop. This groud tellthat mea s that the ground in is in the UDA and the SWAB question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely y,A./ y , 1 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 _ _ ._w 11 _ ifd!lI4d) III f!f!!ffF!!if i?Wit ttttjhlfif! Ii!ffff!fiflfId March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Whichestet, `!a 2260*1 Re: Clendobbin Midge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: 0e. ji�prii 5,h, you will hold a meeting to decide �n�;2ether you should rezone ground o ; & Glendobbin !Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. II?/ith tnlater and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots �jer acre. 1 believe Dlr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is e.1r enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. 'Where ,PfoL!ld that leave the Russells? Piease do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 I f i l i I 1 1 1 1 1 jjt i _ _f% - , i:r :t r!!1 lr ! !I 1iI1!1.!1! :I : March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivisior: Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop_ This ground is in the LIDA and the Si,'l1AB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. Wit'n water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs! lots :,er acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per nt acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local governrne.. is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, C` ;Q Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 51h, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, m �. r Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 APR 4 Frederiuk County Plarbnhlug 107 N rent Street Minchestet, Ala 22601 Re.: Uendobibin Riclige Subjdhlision Dear Gentlemen: rr- LImund oij-� 'to decide villetheF VOL' shO'kil F--zo m ArrH 51h, You, WiN holkJ a meetin-g, of Giendolbin Road in order foF the Russeft to be able to develOP. T 1"Ilis 9-r0m�rl iz in t h a U DA and tlg-a e S,\jIIAB a rea. !7s fa. j, a c- p, c:-,A p t-rs I? that rn ean s th S "I V8 IETT 0 U nL d '; n J; ' qq,je,nuoin, should zee iv ZL mode )e allowed to be developed since it i as SO" a id I so qaje t�,,e capab5fty to have Se'verE,5 io-'LS .er sigould al - t a-acre,Uelievh e N?. Rppm is ashing for eG �pjhjch is equal to 01ne -0 Per lSss Nmn C"�e cav4d for. l ".p!eijd 14�orae that our io<:ai govemm! ene acre. Thai �S a im 'I to see -,*Ih;s are, realize that even, t',,'Mugh sWne O.,d tie 5uvrcundting i1eigiborgs may be against this, they may also sell thek hem e next that. leave the Russells? Please do the right thin and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 IHii li!if il! tif I!i!! I if 11 if f ! ! H - -' March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, :vnn'wA� Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 --- - -•-- - - - -�•_':ts:(ift:f:t:�(,,�ls�::::�1:�:j:j(„<<,�f:t:f<<�t��:f�::i;t:�:( i March 25, 2006 �r Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, comaussiott unty pinning �esuv tick CO 101 jjt V3,2et 2601 wivic I f r - - - - -- - - - - if Ifil.:J!Hd March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision. Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground of-f of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the LIDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for Just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per, acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Y d-w C (/�� Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for n telltha that that he ground n e ale to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area As far as ca question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, _-— _ -�-— _ =�~ _-'��(:if:1;:l:I;�f=:�(;::,�:(t:Isf:I1::�„!1;t;l�:tis�:fE::t�lif:t March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5U', you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the ri t thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Pm �? r .. �. (1 n tom, , ' Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ' ^ 1 1111 t 11 �i 1 IS =: =:1= f.ir=i::..1. r::fr� ;�„fririi:�r=t ::ff:i:ij fr.....:r:r:r:i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Midge Subdivision: Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for lust that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs! lots -jet, acre. 1 believe Mr. Fussell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, r g�erick Counv' P1aMing on 101 N Kent Street e2 601 Winchester, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission. 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge 5ubdivisior: Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs! lots 3er acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see €nis ane realize that ever. though some of the surrounding they may also sell their home next month. Where neighbors may be against this, would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, T Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 •� .�:.,." '^...\. ": i t ! !!11lttl!llt!!SFtI!�!1'��I!!!r1.31 1 3 r ' larch 25, 2006 Frederick 0ounty Planning Oore?r,-iissiO� 107 N bent Street Winchestet, Ala 2250" Re: Giend&s bin 1--idge Subd!visi0r; Deal• Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground oft of Glendobbir. Road in order for t`ie Russells to be aisle to develop. This ground is in FF the UDA and the SONAR area. As far as t can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it �Aias set aside for just that. i mater and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots acre. i belieFje Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lets, which is equal to one iot per acre. That is a iot less than he could ask for. l would hope that our local gonem' risen= ;s Fa§. enoug , to see €his anc realize that even-1?�ough sorne of the surrounding ' Bey may also sell their home next nor �4'�ere neighbors may be against this, ,vou�ld tha leave the Russells? Please do the riglit thing and vote jE!s. Sincerely, � C rcL � ' ENO Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 'i'i_•....-=== —=��:.(�sf�ltfltffCl:��ff�i:s:f(�I,���ff�t�t�(!(if!��fa�:f�;:f=.f�fif 114arch 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentiemen: On April SLh, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Giendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With. water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have sever?! lots aer acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for BO lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 =11 :'= - w r 'arch 25, 20015 Fredericlt County Planning Commission s 02 N bent Street kjlJ inchestet, Va 22601 Dear Gentlemen: On !�gril ath, you j^!iil hoW a imeeting to decide whether you Should rezone ground o'-i of Giendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is is ee Una tiDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside fo: just that. "Aster and se?pre � availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots boiye-,e i!, �r. R ,sell is asking for 60 lots, vyl filch is equal t0 one lot per acre. That is a lot less than hP- could asap foc. I would hope that' ou iocal govemimen= is 'sc^i? eS?c(L9F? to see 'S?"ter;d vealize thateven $I'Ough sere C)ii3e aL?:rourlding neighbor: may be against this, ;,-hey may also sell their home ae;0 V -ere , Gov-ild that-- leays- the. Russells? ;piease do the rlol thing and vote yes. , icerely, PM o`l _y - ;, V., ;I %. 2 n n V, Frederick County Planning Commission I o7 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 March 25, 2006 Fredez ich County Planning Commission 10, N Kent Street V117hichestet, Va 22601 ire: Ciendoi)lain Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: k? _ril 5th, you v,411 hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground o ff c, Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. 'his grog. d is in -he UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in gUertion should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside nor just that. With grater and seN�{er availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots �u acre. a believe Mr. Russell is asking for 50 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. Taut is a, lot less than he could ask for. I viould hope that our local government i5 2i.r enodagh to see this and realize that even though some or the surround4i.9 neighbors may be against this, they may also seta their home next mon'.11. 'AJr here mmuld that leave the Russells? ;Tease do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 r 252006 r,t ii G vederick County Planning Commission 102 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22501 Re: Glendobbin Midge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you vFill hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground oft of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as i can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With +-pater and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severs; lots 3er acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 50 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less t'kan he could ash for_ l would hope that our local govemmen is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. V--here would that leave the Russells? Piense do the right thing and vote yes. Y;ncereiy, '114 V- 61 AJ 12 x� )" "IL V- ANON Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ___ _ :�_ _ ifIifif!ififlt,iffy!IIM!iddliIIIM)ifif!IliHif)IifI!I i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. 1 believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. r p Ni J � Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Ir � J 1 1 1 { 1 j1 Ji i i J1 jI j j )t 3 f i i l March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 1.07 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision: Dear Gentlemen: On Agril 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the LIDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for lust that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have severa! lots 3er acre. i believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where --Mould that leave the Russells? Please do the right th,ng and vote yes. Sincerely, r r PM inns / Frederick County planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 _ _ _ _c _ _ .�. itEiEiF} id: il!!t1lF11!fill li!!ii!!f!FI(FI!if!'il!!t!!!`!I!f!f March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: ezone ground On April 5ih, you will hold a or t'he Russel s to be ng to decide ableer you develop.prThis ground s orb of Glendobbin Road in order the U€iA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for lust that. With, water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. i belie►�elr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 .. - •ram �•� March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager, I would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the iJDA area, so it is an obvious area for growth. Considering this ground is very Close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, NO VA 2 -,'-stj �17 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2hd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec� a cols, G, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 7, 1.-1 1 1 V�- W-r) (i'ng eav,t c-K VA Pm To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 0 R,I-9 R ►-c S, Z7�+F_- 6 T. Frederick Co. Planning Dept: Attn: Susan -Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Steve & Linda Swigef S 118 Gkx"sleF Dr ! c Wily-ttesler, VA 22603 • '� As _ _ =' _ i :" � _ �_ '=fFF(!i!FfFiFFi!Ijf!f1fFF113fF(Fif!FSFFIf!(s(FF1fsFsfsss(!fs�F( To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rze9 a rA, � � a �4 C� j A L �� �4 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 011 f� /J���>G� ,J- �Lt'T MELVIN AND CAROL NASH �•°'"�"'"���y ` `�� SPRING VALLEY 211 HANDLEY DRIVE WINCHESTER, VA. 22603i ._.,.,� I a FREDERICK CO PLANNING DEPT ATTENTION: SUSAN EDDY 107 N. KENT STREET., 2ND FLOOR WINCHESTER, VA. 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.etj a Y Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Mr-&M 212 McGuire Rd. Winchester VA 2260ld- 7 /-V, daz 0 14 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzegards, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 /6-/ 7 1-7) To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick. County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glend obbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current lend usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. l,J4--Cae -D � o, Fred�r�ck Co. ray �J�nc�nes�er, V irc�Z�S c� as �O\ To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Fussell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is fill already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.eg a rds, \nC�e S��r , v �a.�U3 (.J Inc h e lw, V r9t n az c. 03 freaQ-rIc - Co,nrNirl� n-11- n 5 u3cxn -E dd� N. 1hcr1� Sk., anc� Floor r. To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. ReG� a rc{ s, 2-2- 03 i Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 3h3 C-zreef��''�\C�71 r• o e`. t"� ���s c .l "r c4,esker V a Fr'e&r'td. Co. TI )ckrwAv-N9 7i cpp - ►� n : 5 LA 3o,s% lcSrl N • lher�� 5� . net Floor To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop.a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. r • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rze9a[rC(S, 'R&6- 04/toc ')J�a I `�ua� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 2- O"CIL C,/) 2-2- To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, V-),e V-�_ Tanta resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.eg a rd /. O, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 r� �Ir..latucs (:a�nur 216 ('ohon 12idgc lid. Winchester, NA 22603 A To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzeg a KCS, Kevin Sullivan Wkwhesw, VA 22M Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 nsvillue nivb)4 ebtrbiA IA !fill flit iltifit IIIqI])iilii1It1I(ill ,aif! ill Ifit itg.fill Ill JS/3 WN-T o,,,.i r / I33X5 �N3X 'Iv Lod NVs�S �N11�f 60ALZ dA 'NM psm ou"W2ts To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. opt-F- P/F �2►0� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 i / (7 7 ts -V/A W--g,/y f m N L A 00-g- �Ugo -,P-j11y1VVjL4 A-41Y(7q) I To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 D3 l:sij:!:{,l(,tlfsfill;flil:t���=ai�i�(�I:f=a�(���l:,:1,t:jtf To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R,1_ 9 P YG(S, 7 a6�1 W Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 JACK C. WILLIAMS MARY M. WILLIAMS 281 GLENTAWBER DR. WINCHESTER. VA 2260 �; 7 -�� . ,21N25� -- :51-- mow_ i EH j,,�� P M �, ?� 04 APR Robert P. Bowers Paulette M. Bowers and children (3 daughters) 300 Greenfield Dr. Winchester, VA 22603 April 3, 2006 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St. 2"d floor Winchester, VA 22603 Ms. Eddy, We the Bowers DO NOT want the re -zoning that Pam and Glen Russell have requested. We live in Spring Valley off of Apple Pie Ridge where homes are on 5 acre lots and the property in question is practically in our backyard. Our family has invested countless years of work and money into our home. We would like to keep enjoying our home the way it has been for 14 years. We have previously been promised the traditional 5 acre lots would not be changed. We feel that this area is made up of all that type of set up and that we do not want this new re -zoning. We were born in winchester, lived, and worked here all our lives. Please do not allow this re -zoning! Thank you! /L L Robert PWo;wers —n 300 Ch-eenfield Dr Winchester,VA 22603 Zs �+. z � -F oo ---- ------ j6 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzer� a rds, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 _ law ' Bonnie ` � ourt Winclicstcr. vx22mo KATHY B. EUBANK 179 Handley Dr. Winchester, VA 22603 keubank@msn.com 4/4/2006 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St. 2nd Floor Winchester, VA 22601 Ms. Eddy, ;i V I am a resident of Spring Valley Estates which adjoins the Glendobbin-Russell parcel that is being considered for rezoning. I object to the Russell- Glendobbin rezoning for several reasons. - It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in the area. -Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. -Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. -It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is already full. The schools that would be impacted, Apple Pie Ridge Elementary, Frederick County Middle, & James Wood High School, are all older schools that are at or almost at capacity. Frederick County Middle in particular is in desperate need of renovation. Traffic in this area is already heavy. In my opinion this type of development would have serious negative consequences for the surrounding area. It is not the appropriate type of housing for this area and I think that the UDA line needs to be re-evaluated to reflect the current land usage. While I understand that this rezoning request has garnered some support it would seem unfair that people who have no interest other than monetary gain would have their interests protected. I urge you to use caution and common sense when considering this request and deny it. Si cerely, 'ho - U'a"I Kathy B. Eubank Kathy B. Eubank 179 Randley Dr. Winchester, VA`22603 FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING DEPT ATTN: SUSAN EDDY 107 N KENT ST 2ND FLOOR WINCHESTER VA 22601 USA2c F.d b.Jrd To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. V' R eg a rc(s, 76 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Robert Stotler 704 Apple Pie Rift' R(" Windle,w,, VA 22603-4306 /44 "- To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. �k3 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 6�e A77-11J, r. To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzer� a �-ds, yz�o� i To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R?_O a rds, Lc��Cu� A a_� A E aXLX0__' S 01�_) 3-e— � --(a �-A" ­b s4-a_c� e-t 1\_� 4 Aa- W ) bw G a "S' -0 ou 4J�� + 0 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Mr. & Mrs. Edward E. Smith 209 Sterrett Lane Clear Brook, VA 22624 V,T7-I. 0 ? �)4 2 2 (o 01 f OJAV To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. T`.ec) a rots, CC U� 0 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 I? Evelyn H. Stotler 704 Apple Pie Ridge Rd. Winchester, VA 22603-4306 167 /Vo 11/71 170 McGuire Road Winchester, VA 22603 April 3, 2006 Ms. Susan Eddy Frederick Co. Planning Dept. 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Ms. Eddy: I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I am writing to express my concern about the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request. I know you have been apprised of many specific concerns with this request. I strongly agree with these concerns. I am not sure you are aware of the potential traffic nightmare at the intersection of Welltown Pike and Rt. I 1 if this housing development were allowed. It is already very congested there because of increased traffic from the Stonewall Industrial Park. There are train tracks that cross Welltown Pike right next to the Industrial Park entrance and trains stop traffic there several times a day. There are many new businesses building in the Industrial Park which of course will add traffic. These businesses are a source of tax revenue for the county which we obviously need. I question how many of these businesses would wish to stay in this industrial park if their business quests are hindered by traffic congestion on Welltown Pike. This would certainly occur to a much greater degree if high density housing were allowed in this area. I am planning to attend the zoning request meeting this Wednesday, April 5. I hope your committee will seriously consider all the concerns that have been presented. As far as I can see, no one would benefit from this development besides Mr. Russell and many people and businesses would be hurt. Sincerely, Elizabeth B. Drake N Elizabeth B. Drake 170 McGuire Rd. Winchester, VA 22603 Ms. Susan Eddy Frederick Co. Planning Dept. 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 9. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2"d Floor Winchester, VA 22601 April 2, 2206 Dear Ms. Eddy, I am writing to you to express my concern over a proposed rezoning of 65 acres in my neighborhood. It is my understanding that the Frederick County Planning Commission will be deliberating very soon on a request to rezone property along Glendobbin Road to permit higher density housing. As a resident of the Glendobbin Road area, I strongly encourage you to reconsider Pam and Glen Russell's rezoning request to place 60 homes on — 65 acres in our neighborhood. Glendobbin Road is a paved country road with steep hills and blind curves which makes it ill -suited to handle the additional stresses of over 120 additional residents. In fact, the road sees many accidents and already experiences heavy traffic from high school students who exceed the posted speed limit of 55 miles per hour, lose control of their cars, and regularly crash into fences lining the lane. Doubling the number of houses on Glendobbin will exacerbate this already dangerous situation. We believe that it would be a tremendous mistake to permit such high density housing on such a road. In addition, the proposed subdivision is inconsistent with the surrounding homes that sit on 2-5 acre home sites. The additional 60 homes would add more students to Apple Pie Ridge Elementary which is near capacity and cause over -crowding at Frederick County Middle School which is currently over -capacity. This proposed subdivision is situated adjacent to orchards, an industrial complex, and is within the path of the proposed Route 37 Extension. Finally, I hope that the Planning Commission will seriously consider plans to remove the Glendobbin Road area from the UDA because of these dangers. Thank you for considering my objections to the Russell's rezoning request. Rebecca Watts Blake and Rebecca Watts 605 Glendobbin Rd. Winchester, VA 22603 USA `U �. ? iii l AA- K �' Au«k Wv��� �� a����� l0 �- �►� . �.,e ., + 5� �- � � � to � r 2 Z (.c Ralph E. and Nancy C. Henderson 320 Union View Lane Winchester, VA 22603 April 2, 2006 Ms. Susan K. Eddy Senior Planner Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Ms. Eddy: Late this past year we moved to the Winchester, VA area from the State of Illinois. When we were first looking for a home, it was difficult to find something close to work, good proximity to shopping and restaurants, and also have a feeling of being in the country. Then we found a new development, Glendobbin Ridge, which offered what we had been looking for. We even paid additional funds for a lot at the end of the cul-de-sac on Union View Lane so that there would be less traffic, less noise, and a safer environment to walk our dog, mingle with neighbors, and enjoy the natural surroundings. We are writing you to express our concerns and opposition to the rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell- Glendobbin. The rezoning would essentially eliminate the reasons why we purchased our home in this area of Frederick County. There would be a negative impact on the value of our new home, there would be more traffic and noise, the area would become less safe for walking and gathering with neighbors and friends, the natural atmosphere of the area would suffer, and people like ourselves who are considering retiring in Frederick County, would be forced to look elsewhere. With the negative impact the rezoning would have on the quality of life of the current residents in this area, we are hoping that the decision makers on the Frederick County Planning and Development Department will want to maintain and preserve what they have already created. Additionally, we do not understand how the preservation parcel of Gleddobbin Ridge can be changed without approval from the Planning Commission. Since we have moved into our new home, the Russells have removed a significant number of large and small trees within the parcel, widened the roadway through the parcel, laid base rock on the roadway (which is customary prior to asphalting), and installed a large unsightly gate across the roadway. This seems very presumptuous on the part of the Russells, is not consistent with the intent of the preservation, and ignores the authority of the Planning Commission. Personally, we feel that the preservation parcel should be brought back to its original state. In conclusion, we oppose any rezoning and hope that you and the other members of the Frederick County Planning and Development Department will continue to uphold the requirements for land development as was done in Glendobbin Ridge, and that any future development will remain consistent with the existing neighborhoods in the area. We respectfully urge you to decline the request for rezoning, and continue to make decisions that favorably impact the quality of life for the residents of Frederick County. S' cerely, Ralph and Nancy Henderson +: t,t t:t,t:t �,t[:::•r¢ r::t;ts r t:,tt,: P,i,E:r — — — — — — �� NbSnS Na I ;ra /Orr VA L'.N% -��" 45 *-M Z. 0/ ta 04 1 p 1,2 q 17 .)V 4-14tv�tvjaq '1) 21 2g Ins To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. As a business owner in Stonewall Industrial Park, I oppose the rezoning. Please consider what is best for the community. This rezoning will increase the riches of a few to the detriment of the community as a whole. Look at the traffic, our roads, and the county resources.... This area is appealing because of the rural nature and the orchards. Don't turn Winchester into Northern Virginia! Frederick Co. Planning Dept, Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 W1 OMEGA DRYWALL, LTD. 252 Tyson Drive Winchester, VA 22603-4641 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 1,'ag. Re�afds, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 �Gf Pzs-e�{eCc �t 0 • May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. 7ti , MAY 1 6 .2006 Z0 30dd -Mss a WVd QNd N319 b0SIZ990bS 60:Si 900Z/SI/S0 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the acoess to water and sewer, i understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't atlow this to happen, as there are many more families that Could benefit from this plan. nk you f ur ti e yr M aY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, / a,/ N � � W May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, i understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, mb �Py May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, i understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, A 1 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, a ) r� �O 1 6 To May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. lfOO May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. / O Sincerely, /x � # /— I I May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely,kAaA-�) r May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. 7bank you for your time. Sincerely, � r L,-.e ) 6Ld r, R (� May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, V, ; ) � S e f ) May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, rl(\� 1. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, � C D _,___ �', May 79 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbih Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, (-� M -\,- -- May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, " 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, r' May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. c Sincerely, a a,,� �� May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, �L May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It Is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. 4 L Sincerely, 1Jz May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. i believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, �^'� G L ° r5 M AY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 4 -1- - May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Z Sincerely, �1�- May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that Is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, �5 ; / ( C, / /4 02 f-\ May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. X- Sincerely, May 712006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you In reference to the piece of property on Glendobb Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Si cerely May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, i �'t `. , `, 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, " 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sir May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, MO 1 6 To May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Giendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobb Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground 1 being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. i believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this, plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, /� T May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, �. �N May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, 1 understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from thin plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 4( May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, "U✓L2 �j May 77 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope, that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this; plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 77 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobb Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, R I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this 10 happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. I Thank you for your time. May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this io happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from thin plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, .4 V ,"A �,, 16 20 THIS GROUP OF LETTERS WERE HAND -DELIVERED ON APRIL 4, 2006 BY MR. RONALD W. STROSNIDER OF APPLE MANOR PROPERTIES. DIANE WALSH Q March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission i07 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re. Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 51h, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as i can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5i", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, )f,o_ �'- 4 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the USA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Since ely, „c/ March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, 7 n March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That its a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, I �, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5i", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, /1 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as i can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Si erely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is In the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Tease do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, M'41 Y, �� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, Z)y ��c� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? 'lease do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 307 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, �( March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe 11/IIr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in ordeafAs f or r as 1 canste�liha tmeans that the grole to develop. This w d �n is in the UDA and the SWAB a question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do t right thing and vote yes. Q Sincerely, �� v March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. r Sincerely, 7 i 15,571i:nJA��Y IIc�E 3(%Y-d r i-sbdF March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and Tvote yes. Sincerely, L, =-� a �� I� � 2- ), March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, ;/� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, / March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: 0n April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, YIIC- �� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote ye! Sincerely, U&CLU March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UQA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincer ely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, � t,�n March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 51", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, �L March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, / March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincer ly, i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, i J March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, I March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, ' l March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, 61-ukkly JA—� 1kn March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re; Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Giendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for_ I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UQA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, :lCu� � Iw,ty c;L March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UrDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mir. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely,'" March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. -'" Sincerely, jjt March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, J: March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote Sincerely, 'l March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 51h, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the U€}A and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre.'. believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing an vote yes. Sincerely, _� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ©ear Gentlemen: On April 5tti, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as l can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, ��v March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Giendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision ®ear Gentlemen: On April 51h, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order reafAs far or as Russells canste/ltha tmea s that he grole to develop. This nground is in the UDA and the SWAB question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. 1 would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. SiIIt, �r March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5t", you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, A%•'. J March 30, 2006 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning & Development 107 N. Kent St., 2"d Floor, Winchester, VA 22601 Ms. Eddy, My name is J.P. Darlington and I am writing to you to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, # 17-05 of Russell- Glendobbin. I own land adjoining two sides of the Russell property in question. I have three hundred acres which consists of 51 5- acre lots and a 45- acre parcel on which I live. All of this land is part of Spring Valley Estates. My land extends from Rt. 37 to large lots along Glendobbin Rd. I have a number of concerns and objections to this request for rezoning. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than '/2-acre lots would be adjacent to land owned by me and the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently purchased their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It is my opinion that even though the current UDA would double the value of my property I feel that the UDA is inappropriate for this area and should be lifted. .41V r Third, high density communities do not exist in this area, what is being proposed will reshape this entire community and pave the way for more of this type of development. Fourth, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge, and Rt. 522. Fifth, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Rd., Payne Rd., Welltown Pike, and Apple Pie Ridge. These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is already flooded with the surge when school lets out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Pike to the east and Apple Pie Ridge to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. In closing I urge you to deny this request for rezoning because the proposed high -density subdivision is not compatible with the surrounding area and would create serious traffic issues. Sincerely, J.P. Darlington HARRISON & JOHNSTON, PLC 21 South Loudoun Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 P.O. Box 809 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Telephone 540.667.1266 Facsimile 540.667.1312 March 30, 2006 Mrs. June Wilmot, Chair Frederick County Planning Commission 412 Westside Station Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Stephen L. Pettler, Jr. Direct Fax 540.545.8582 pe ttler(ti harrison-johnston. com Mobile 540.664.5134 Re: Rezoning Aaalication #17-05 for Russ ell -Glen dobbin, • Adjoining property of Harley and Roxie Ostlund Dear Mrs. Wilmot: Please be advised that I represent Harley and Roxie Ostlund. They are the owners of lot 15 of the Glendobbin Ridge subdivision. This property adjoins the lots proposed to be re -zoned in the above referenced application which comes before the Planning Commission on April 5, 2006. In fact, 36.5387 acres of the land proposed for rezoning (over half) is the rural preservation lot created during the subdivision approval of the Glendobbin Ridge subdivision. There is an easement on my clients' property which is referenced in the Russell-Glendobbin proffer statement (dated March 10, 2006) and the impact analysis dated March 2006. The Ostlunds have sought my counsel regarding concerns they have about the easement and the deed of dedication relative to the rural preservation lot. The Ostlunds have asked me to report my findings to you and the other members of the planning commission (who I have copied with this letter). My findings are as follows. When the Glendobbin Ridge subdivision was created, as deed of dedication with restrictions was granted in favor of the property owners in the subdivision. This was recorded on January 9. 2003 in the Clerk's office for Frederick County. The deed of dedication incorporates the subdivision plat which creates the lots in the subdivision. On the plat, there is set forth an easement titled "50' PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT" from the cul de sac at the end of Union View Lane, 25 feet of which runs across my clients lot (lot 15) and 25 feet which runs on lot 16. There is no reservation of the noted easement by the declarant of the subdivision recited in the deed of dedication. However, there is a note on the plat, which reads as follows: The proposed private driveway/road is not built according to street specifications of and will not be maintained by, the Virginia Department ofTransportation or Frederick County. The improvement and maintenance of said driveway/road shall be the sole responsibility of the owners of lots which are provided with access via the driveway/road. Said driveway/roads will not be considered for inclusion into the state secondary system until they meet the applicable construction standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The cost of bringing said driveway/road to acceptable standards shall not be borne by the Virginia Department of Transportation nor by Frederick County. RECEIVED APR 0 31006 Letter to Frederick County Planning Commission, March 30, 2006 Page 2 The plat also sets forth the following note on the 36.5387 acre lot which is the subject of rezoning: 40 % RESERVE LOT 36.5387 AC. (CANNOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED PER SECTION 165- 54D ZONING ORDINANCE) A copy of the page showing these notes is attached with this letter. The Russell's proffer statement, at paragraph 11.3, sets forth their proffer to create a "private gated connection between the internal road network for the project and Union View Lane for emergency access. Said connection shall be extended from the Property across the existing 50-foot access easement within the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision to the current terminus of Union View Lane." This is the easement shown to be on the Ostlund's property (in part). Given these facts, I have advised the Ostlunds regarding their rights relative to the easement on their property and the deed of dedication as follows: 1. The deed of dedication does not appear to grant the 50' access easement in favor of the "Reserve Lot." As this is not expressed in the deed of dedication, Virginia law requires one to look to the plat. The note on the plat expressly states that the easement was not granted to VDOT as the public roads in the subdivision were. Instead the note states that the "improvement and maintenance of said driveway/road shall be the sole responsibility of the owners of lots which are provided with access via the driveway/road." The "owners of lots which are provided access" are arguably the owners of lots 16 and 15 as the Reserve Lot was created to be set aside for the benefit of the subdivision as a whole. Thus, there is an issue as to whether or not the "Reserve Lot" in the rezoning application has a right to use the easement on lots 15 and 16. 2. As a matter of law in Virginia, "no use may be made of the easement which is different from that established at the time of its creation and which imposes an additional burden upon the servient estate." Haves v Aquia r,garina Ir�c , 243 Va. 255, 414 S.E.2d 820 (1992), citing Cushman Corporation v Barnes, 204 Va. at 253, 129 S.E.2d at 639-40 (1963). Under the instant facts, if it is assumed that the 50' access easement is granted in favor of the Reserve Lot, the joinder of that lot with an additional 30 acres and the subdivision of the resulting parcel into 60 lots creates an enormous additional burden on the Ostlund's lot 15. At the time the easement was granted, it was granted in favor of a rural preservation lot. Now it is proposed to serve as an access to a 60 home subdivision (although admittedly not a primary access). The result of such a change of use is that the easement is therefore extinguished as set forth in the Cushman opinion. See also, Ellis v. Simmons, 270 Va. 371, 619 S.E.2d 88 (2005). 3. The note on the plat pertaining to the fact that the Reserve Lot cannot be further subdivided arguably prohibits the owner of the lot from doing so. The deed of dedication expressly Letter to Frederick County Planning Commission, March 30, 2006 Page 3 allow the owners of lots in Glendobbin Ridge to enforce its terms. The deed of dedication contains conflicting restrictions regarding subdivision of the Reserve Lot. It is exempted from a general restriction imposed on all other lots in the subdivision (paragraph 16), but imposes a restriction in the plat. Virginia Code § 15.2-2265 provides that the recordation of a valid plat conveys the rights set forth therein to the locality designated. This is regardless of there being a deed of dedication or statement in a deed of dedication specifying the rights. See, Burns v. Board of Su ervisors Stafford County, 226 Va. 506, 312 S.E.2d 731 (1984). Thus the Russells are deemed to have granted the right to enforce the "no further subdivision" restriction set forth in the subdivision plat to the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County as a matter of law. 4. The Ostlunds have a cause of action against the Russells to stop them from subdividing the Reserve Lot as the plat of the subdivision which they relied upon when they purchased their property in 2004 expressly states that the Reserve Lot will not be subdivided. Thus, under principles of equity, the Russells should be estopped from now subdividing land which the public record appears to restrict. Any ambiguity created in the deed of dedication and plat drafted by the Russells is their doing and it would be unjust to allow the Russells to benefit from this to the detriment of the innocent purchasers of the lots in the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision. The Ostlunds understand that with the exception of the rights granted to the County as set forth in item No. 3, the issues set fort are theirs to pursue against the Russells. However, they ask that you give consideration to these matters in weighing the decision to approve the rezoning request. Hopefully your decision will obviate their need to take independent action. Thank you for your courtesy and attention to the Ostlund's concerns. Should you or any member of the Planning Commission have any questions in any regard, please do not hesitate to contact me. With best regards, I am VYhn y StPettier, Jr. SLP/jdw Enclosure Cc: All Members of the Frederick County Planning Commission Susan Eddy, Frederick County Planning (By hand delivery) Mr & Mrs. Ostlund AioR43_ � Q-2l � A/ 2QCn co ` T 1s� co � DA C co NO. 1455 ~ ml�t a o SUFN p m ry U') Z lot 73 43-9-73 RA VACANT 67.41'17" E N T 'k M. FURSTtNAU ~Z The proposed private driveway/toed Is not built according to street specificalions of and " not be maintained by. the Virginia Department of Ttansporbtbn or Frederick County. The improve- ment and mainterm" of gold driveway/road shell be the sole responsibility of the owners of lots which are provided with access via the driveway/toad. Said driveway/roads will not be. considered for inch»ion into the gists secondary system until they meet the applicable construction standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The cost of bringing said driveway/road to acceptable standards shell not be borne by the Wginis Department of Transpwistion nor by Frederick County. FINRL PLRT RURAL PRESERVATION SUBDIVISION GLENDOBBIN RIDGE STONEKRLL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIR SPRING VALLEY SECTION 4 ALL LOTS IN THE NAME OF MA SHALL MILLS INC. lot 72 RA i lot 71 RA lot 70 RA I 43-9-72 VACANTI 43-9-71 VACA0 VACANT Q _N 68001 ' 07"H 1519. 94' _ _ 43-9-70 � 00 Q 50' @RL (D U �s1 40 % RESERVE LOT s1 36.5387 AC. (CANNOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED ram4 PER SECTION 165-54D OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE) T 31 Cn O N N BRAIN \ 0 a'v FIELD \1 U � E sy 20 i,te �.>r• N o pj 44L2' I MCKOWN 43-A-15 RA VACANT S 68009'59"E 1220. LOT 16 , J Cr M 0 �in <r`F- Q U , 0 IT ^— Z ,w a �= U 00 W Q) > N O %r W� Z I LOT IS rev 10/10."02 H Z Q U Q NAPIER, POND, ATHEY & ATHEY, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 35 N. ROYAL AVENUE EO. BOX 395 FRONT ROYAL, VIRGINIA 22630 RONALD LEWIS NAPIER J. DANIEL POND II KIMBERLY M. ATHEY CLIFFORD L. ATHEY, JR. April 4, 2006 J. DANIEL POND III JOHN S. BELL Members of the Frederick County Planning Commission APR 5 PHONE (540) 635-2123 FAX (540) 635-7004 lawyers@npaalaw.com PLEASE REPLY TO: P.O. BOX 395 Re: Memorandum of Law Related to Application for Rezoning of Tax Map Parcels 43-A- 15(B) and 43-A-16 Containing 67.73 Acres Located in the Stonewall Magisterial District of Frederick County (Russell - Glendobbin) Dear Planning Commissioners: The 67.7242 acre Russell-Glendobbin property which is the subject matter of this rezoning application consists of two parcels, one of which is 36.6389 acres (Parcel A) and the other is 31.1853 acres (Parcel B). The entire area of the site is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA). Parcel A is the preservation parcel ("40% parcel") of the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision, a rural preservation subdivision totaling sixteen lots that was approved by Frederick County in 2002. Parcel A is situated at the south end of the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision adjacent to Stonewall Industrial Park. Parcel B extends north from Parcel A to Glendobbin Road, and is immediately east and adjacent to lots 3 through 16 of Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision. It is important to note that the acreage comprising the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision was located within the UDA at the time of subdivision approval. QUESTIONS PRESENTED The foregoing Memorandum of Law addresses the following questions presented: (1) Whether the applicant has the right under Virginia law and the Code of Frederick County to apply for this rezoning when a portion of the land was the Rural Preservation Parcel (40 % parcel) of Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision; and (2) Whether the Frederick County Planning Commission would be acting in a manner consistent with the comprehensive plan and the county zoning ordinance by approving the application for rezoning to Residential Performance (RP) when the land is within the Urban Development Area? FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The 67.7242 acre Russell-Glendobbin property lies wholly within the Urban Development Area (UDA) of Frederick County, with the majority of the acreage also within the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). 2. The site is located adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision, a rural preservation subdivision created by the applicant that is currently developing with single family detached units on 2-acre lots. 3. The proposed development of the Russell-Glendobbin property will provide a transition from the more intensive land uses within Stonewall Industrial Park to the low density residential development pattern that extends north and west from this area. 4. Approximately 37 acres of the site is platted as the preservation parcel (40 % parcel) of the existing Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision. 5. A Rural Preservation Parcel is normally reserved exclusively for open space or agricultural uses; however, Section 165-54(D)(3) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance encourages the Board of Supervisors to release a preservation parcel that is within the UDA from such development restrictions. 6. The rezoning of the site for single family residential development is consistent with the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan, which expressly calls for suburban residential uses to predominate on this property because it is wholly within the UDA. 7. The integration of average one acre lots contained within this proposal will create an alternative residential development pattern that will ultimately enhance consumer choice and foster a dynamic housing market, both of which are key objectives of the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. 8. The Applicant has offered a proffer program that will appropriately and effectively mitigate the impacts of this development. 9. The portion of the UDA wherein the Russell-Glendobbin property is located is a transitional area that currently includes light industrial, low density residential, and agricultural land uses. 10. By introducing alternative lot sizes served by public facilities to an area of relatively low residential densities, this proposal will result in an appropriately diverse residential development. 11. The proposed rezoning of the subject acreage from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance) is consistent with the land use policies of the Comprehensive Policy 2 Plan within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Section 15.2-2223 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, provides for the preparation and adoption of a Comprehensive Plan by each locality in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Virginia Code Section 15.2-2223 states in pertinent part that "the local planning commission shall prepare and recommend a comprehensive plan for the physical development of the territory within its jurisdiction and every governing body shall adopt a comprehensive plan for the territory under its jurisdiction. In the preparation of a comprehensive plan, the Planning Commission is required by the Commonwealth to make careful and comprehensive surveys and studies of the existing conditions and trends of growth, and of the probable future requirements of its territory and inhabitants. The Comprehensive Plan must be made with the purpose of guiding and accomplishing a coordinated, adjusted and harmonious development of the territory which will, in accordance with present and probable future needs and resources, best promote the health, safety, morals, order, convenience, prosperity and general welfare of the inhabitants, including the elderly and persons with disabilities. (See Section 15.2-2223, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended) The Commonwealth also requires that the Comprehensive Plan designate the general or approximate location, character, and extent of each feature shown on the plan and indicate where existing lands or facilities are proposed to be extended, widened, removed, relocated, vacated, narrowed, abandoned, or changed in use as the case may be." The plan, with the accompanying maps, plats, charts, and descriptive matter, must also show the locality's long-range recommendations for the general development of the territory covered by the plan. That plan must include, but need not be limited to: The designation of areas for various types of public and private development and use, such as different kinds of residential, including age -restricted, housing; business; industrial; agricultural; mineral resources; conservation; recreation; public service; flood plain and drainage; and other areas; The state also requires the preparation of an official map and capital improvements program, a subdivision ordinance, a zoning ordinance and zoning district maps, mineral resource district maps and agricultural and forestall district maps, where applicable. (See Virginia Code Section 15.2-2223, et seq.) Generally, pursuant to Virginia Code Section 15.2-2223, the County of Frederick has prepared a Comprehensive Plan along with an Official Zoning Map. Moreover, the Frederick 3 County government has designated certain areas of the county for residential development which it refers to as its Urban Development Area. Because the 67 acre Russell-Glendobbin parcels are clearly within the Urban Development Area as designated by the Frederick County Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors pursuant to its authority under Virginia Code Section 15.2-2223, an outright denial of a rezoning petition seeking a residential zoning classification for this particular site would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and potentially subject Frederick County to litigation to enforce its Comprehensive Plan by Glen and Pamela Russell. In addition, Section 165-54(D) of the Frederick County Code which pertains to Rural Areas Districts and Rural Preservation Lots states as follows: 1. Within the RA Rural Areas District, lots as small as two acres shall be permitted on tracts over 20 acres in size, subject to the following: a. Forty percent of the parent tract must remain intact as a contiguous parcel. b. This acreage must be designated prior to the division of the fourth lot. C. No future division of this portion of the parent tract will be permitted. 2. Exception to single forty -percent parcel. In cases where excessive topography or other natural features of a site create a situation where a higher quality subdivision design resulting in less physical and/or visual disruption could be achieved by allowing two residual parcels to be created, the Planning Commission may permit the 40% to be made up of two parcels. 3. Board waiver of division restriction. Ten years from the date of the creation of any forty -percent parcel and following a public hearing, the Board of Supervisors may release the parcel from the restrictions of Subsection D(1) through the process of rezoning, provided that the rezoning is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in effect at that time. Any forty -percent parcel which is within the Urban Development Area (UDA) at the time of its creation or is included within the UDA as a result of a future expansion of the UDA, shall be eligible for rezoning at that point and shall not be subject to the ten-year restriction on rezoning. (See Section 165-54(D), Code of Frederick County) Specifically, Frederick County Code Section 165-54(D)(3) states that any 40% parcel which is within the Urban Development Area (UDA) at the time of its creation or is included within the UDA as a result of the future expansion of the UDA, shall be eligible for rezoning at that point and shall not be subject to the ten-year restriction on a change of zoning and further resubdivision. As a result thereof, even though the 36.5389 acre Parcel A which is contained within the Russell-Glendobbin site is currently a preservation parcel as defined in Frederick County Code Section 165-54(D) as a result of the Russell's 2002 subdivision which created Glendobbin 4 Ridge Subdivision, that Rural Preservation Parcel "shall still be eligible for rezoning" since at the time of its creation as a Rural Preservation Parcel within the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Areas Subdivision, the Rural Preservation Parcel was located within the Urban Development Area. In conclusion, this Application for rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for Frederick County since the land is wholly within the Urban Development Area. This Planning Commission recommended and the County Board of Supervisors adopted a future Land Use Map which reflects that the subject property should be rezoned to residential performance as permitted in the Urban Development Area and the Code of Frederick County. This remains true even though a portion of the property was subdivided in 2002 to a Rural Preservation Lot. Therefore, I request, on behalf of my clients, Glen and Pamela Russell, that you approve this Application. Sincerely, Kimberly M. Athey 5 � HARRISON & JOHNSTON, PLC 21 South Loudoun Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 P.O. Box 809 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Telephone 540.667.1266 Facsimile 540.667.1312 March 30, 2006 Mrs. June Wilmot, Chair Frederick County Planning Commission 412 Westside Station Drive Winchester, VA 22601 MAR 3 1' Stephen L Pettler, Jr. Direct Fax 540.545.8582 pettler@harrison-johnston.com Mobile 540.664.5134 Re: Rezoning Application #17-05 for Russell-Glendobbin; Adjoining_nropem of Harley and Roxie Ostlund Dear Mrs. Wilmot: Please be advised that I represent Harley and Roxie Ostlund. They are the owners of lot 15 of the Glendobbin Ridge subdivision. This property adjoins the lots proposed to be re -zoned in the above referenced application which comes before the Planning Commission on April 5, 2006. In fact, 36.5387 acres of the land proposed for rezoning (over half) is the rural preservation lot created during the subdivision approval of the Glendobbin Ridge subdivision. There is an easement on my clients' property which is referenced in the Russell-Glendobbin proffer statement (dated March 10, 2006) and the impact analysis dated March 2006. The Ostlunds have sought my counsel regarding concerns they have about the easement and the deed of dedication relative to the rural preservation lot. The Ostlunds have asked me to report my findings to you and the other members of the planning commission (who I have copied with this letter). My findings are as follows. When the Glendobbin Ridge subdivision was created, as deed of dedication with restrictions was granted in favor of the property owners in the subdivision. This was recorded on January 9, 2003 in the Clerk's office for Frederick County. The deed of dedication incorporates the subdivision plat which creates the lots in the subdivision. On the plat, there is set forth an easement titled "50' PRIVATE ACCESS EASEMENT" from the cul de sac at the end of Union View Lane, 25 feet of which runs across my clients lot (lot 15) and 25 feet which runs on lot 16. There is no reservation of the noted easement by the declarant of the subdivision recited in the deed of dedication. However, there is a note on the plat, which reads as follows: The proposed private driveway/road is not built according to street specifications of and will not be maintained by, the Virginia Department ofTransportation or Frederick County. The improvement and maintenance of said driveway/road shall be the sole responsibility of the owners of lots which are provided with access via the driveway/road. Said driveway/roads will not be considered for inclusion into the state secondary system until they meet the applicable construction standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The cost of bringing said driveway/road to acceptable standards shall not be borne by the Virginia Department of Transportation nor by Frederick County. Letter to Frederick County Planning Commission, L March 30, 2006 Page 2 The plat also sets forth the following note on the 36.5387 acre lot which is the subject of rezoning: 40 % RESERVE LOT 36.5387 AC. (CANNOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED PER SECTION 165- 54D ZONING ORDINANCE) A copy of the page showing these notes is attached with this letter. The Russell's proffer statement, at paragraph 11.3, sets forth their proffer to create a "private gated connection between the internal road network for the project and Union View Lane for emergency access. Said connection shall be extended from the Property across the existing 50-foot access easement within the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision to the current terminus of Union View Lane." This is the easement shown to be on the Ostlund's property (in part). Given these facts, I have advised the Ostlunds regarding their rights relative to the easement on their property and the deed of dedication as follows: 1. The deed of dedication does not appear to grant the 50' access easement in favor of the "Reserve Lot." As this is not expressed in the deed of dedication, Virginia law requires one to look to the plat. The note on the plat expressly states that the easement was not granted to VDOT as the public roads in the subdivision were. Instead the note states that the "improvement and maintenance of said driveway/road shall be the sole responsibility of the owners of lots which are provided with access via the driveway/road." The "owners of lots which are provided access" are arguably the owners of lots 16 and 15 as the Reserve Lot was created to be set aside for the benefit of the subdivision as a whole. Thus, there is an issue as to whether or not the "Reserve Lot" in the rezoning application has a right to use the easement on lots 15 and 16. 2. As a matter of law in Virginia, "no use may be made of the easement which is different from that established at the time of its creation and which imposes an additional burden upon the servient estate." Haves v. Aquia Marina Inc.,243 Va. 255, 414 S.E.2d 820 (1992), citing Cushman Corporation v Barnes, 204 Va. at 253, 129 S.E.2d at 639-40 (1963). Under the instant facts, if it is assumed that the 50' access easement is granted in favor of the Reserve Lot, the joinder of that lot with an additional 30 acres and the subdivision of the resulting parcel into 60 lots creates an enormous additional burden on the Ostlund's lot 15. At the time the easement was granted, it was granted in favor of a rural preservation lot. Now it is proposed to serve as an access to a 60 home subdivision (although admittedly not a primary access). The result of such a change of use is that the easement is therefore extinguished as set forth in the Cushman opinion. See also, Ellis I. Simmons, 270 Va. 371, 619 S.E.2d 88 (2005). 3. The note on the plat pertaining to the fact that the Reserve Lot cannot be further subdivided arguably prohibits the owner of the lot from doing so. The deed of dedication expressly Letter to Frederick County Planning Commission, March 30, 2006 Page 3 allow the owners of lots in Glendobbin Ridge to enforce its terms. The deed of dedication contains conflicting restrictions regarding subdivision of the Reserve Lot. It is exempted from a general restriction imposed on all other lots in the subdivision (paragraph 16), but imposes a restriction in the plat. Virginia Code § 15.2-2265 provides that the recordation of a valid plat conveys the rights set forth therein to the locality designated. This is regardless of there being a deed of dedication or statement in a deed of dedication specifying the rights. See, Burns v. Board of Su ervisors Stafford Coun , 226 Va. 506, 312 S.E.2d 731 (1984). Thus the Russells are deemed to have granted the right to enforce the "no further subdivision" restriction set forth in the subdivision plat to the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County as a matter of law. 4. The Ostlunds have a cause of action against the Russells to stop them from subdividing the Reserve Lot as the plat of the subdivision which they relied upon when they purchased their property in 2004 expressly states that the Reserve Lot will not be subdivided. Thus, under principles of equity, the Russells should be estopped from now subdividing land which the public record appears to restrict. Any ambiguity created in the deed of dedication and plat drafted by the Russells is their doing and it would be unjust to allow the Russells to benefit from this to the detriment of the innocent purchasers of the lots in the Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision. The Ostlunds understand that with the exception of the rights granted to the County as set forth in item No. 3, the issues set fort are theirs to pursue against the Russells. However, they ask that you give consideration to these matters in weighing the decision to approve the rezoning request. Hopefully your decision will obviate their need to take independent action. Thank you for your courtesy and attention to the Ostlund's concerns. Should you or any member of the Planning Commission have any questions in any regard, please do not hesitate to contact me. With best regards, I am Very trul SteJhPn L. Pettler, SLP/jdw Enclosure Cc: All Members of the Frederick County Planning Commission Susan Eddy, Frederick County Planning (By hand delivery) Mr & Mrs. Ostlund C R 43_4-21 MORRN 58 3•RA AGICU ~29 ►s L iUR� rIN On a o ; r\ O DA D M. FURSTENAU NO. 1d55 mII~ � a ! .q� _ m m S U'01 The proposed private drk*mW/road is not built according to street specificaliorn of and WN not be maintained by, the Virginia Department of Ttansportallon or Frederick County. The improve- ment and maintenance of tall driveway/road shall be the sole responsibility of the owners of lots which are provided with access via the driveway/road. Sold driveway/toads will not be - considered for inck»lon into the elate secondary system until they %meet the applicable construction standards of ilia Virginia Department of Transportation. The cost of bringing said driveway/road to acceptable standards shell not be borne by the Virginia Department of Transportation nor by Frederick County. FINAL PLAT RURRL PRESERVATION SUBDIVISION r� GLENDOBBIN RIDGE > STONEWRLL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIR 0 0 m ( �' SPRING VALLEY SECTION 4 Ln Z lot 73 _ ALL LOTS IN THE NAME OF MA6SHALL MILLS INC. 3 6 7.41*17" E 43-9-73 I lot 72 RA i lot 71 RA lot 70 RA RA VACANT ' 43-9-72 VACANTI 43-9-71 VACANY, VACANT ; Q N 68001 ' 07"W 1519. 94' 43-9-70 W Go z W co <t — — - - 50' BRL (D in U 0 M > d' b 0 N 40 % RESERVE LOT 36.5387 AC. (CANNOT BE FURTHER SUBDIVIDED PER SECTION 165-54D OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE) Well site \ DRAIN \� FIELD ; ,— — 50- 6RL S 66009'59"E 1220• MCKOWN 43-A-15 RA VACANT i LOT 16 J mi b' ini < r-- l— W z , r• I Q _ W Q1 U I .o�> t-4— Z I w tD Q Iin I LO Q of m> M I 0 0 ro� Z I LOT IS rev 10/10.'02 I— Z Q U Q t - • Page 1 of-2 Susan Eddy From: david worthington [worthington.david@worldnet.att.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2006 11:19 PM To: 'Susan Eddy' Cc: cdehaven@crosslink.net-, Bosvanosten@aol.com Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Importance: High Susan, I was hoping to speak at tomorrow's Board of Supervisors meeting but due to pressing work I will be unable to attend. Therefore, I am sending my comments to you and CC Board Members DeHaven and VanOsten for their information. I would appreciate if you could sharing or provide this e-mail to the appropriate parties for their information as well. First, I want to thank the applicant for recognizing that 130 homes on 1/3 acre lots does not match the character of the area. I also want to thank the local citizens for speaking out and having their voice heard. The applicant's decision to reduce the number of houses from the original 130 to what I understand is 30 homes on 2/3 of an acre is, in my opinion, a move in the right direction. The question that I have for you and the Board is while the area in question is certainly within the LIDA and is the right place to build is this still too high a density to place adjacent to what amounts to rural and industrial land? What type of density does the Planning staff and Board envision for this area? Certainly some of the rural character of the area will be lost as development pressures continue but in an area that currently has active orchards and houses on five acre lots homes placed on 2/3 of an acre certainly seem out of place. Furthermore, if this rezoning passes I fear that the Board will have established the new density requirements in the area. Land that is currently tied up in five acre plots or more will be subdivided in the future as the currently homeowners sell their homes and new developments on 2/3 of an acre or less will occur. I have seen this trend occur in the counties to our East and it is maddening to the residents who want the character of their community to remain, only to see it lost one piece at a time. Is this what the Planning Staff and Board envision for this area in the future? If not what are their future views? They need to know that their vote tomorrow affects more than this one single rezoning. Please note that other jurisdictions have tried to provide for transition zones from heavily urbanized areas to the less populated rural areas. Is this the policy of Frederick County and if not why? It would seem appropriate as you go farther away from our cities that the land be transitioned from urban to rural. In keeping with this theme if a transition zone overlay was placed over the Glendobbin area what type of density would be appropriate? Perhaps one or two acres per house?? think that a compromise can be worked out that allows for the applicant to develop this property but is done so at a density that does not affect the future character of the area. Hopefully you can the Board can be the instruments of such a compromise. In addition to the above issue I noticed in the staff report that the area is wooded. While it appears to be an island of woods in a sea of homes and likely would not qualify as a wildlife corridor (if I am wrong on this please let me know) it is an area that should be carefully developed as to not disturb the wildlife that thrives in the area. Has this applicant proffered tree protection areas that can act as wildlife areas and become buffers between the adjacent property owners? Is there any thought on the impact this project (and others in the UDA) have on our wildlife? Also what is the Planning Staff and Board's opinion on wildlife corridors within the UDA area to allow wildlife to traverse our region without having affecting traffic, safety and reducing the interactions between man and them? Is this being addressed as part of the UDA study???? I thank you for your time and if you should have any questions or comments on the above, please call me at 540- 665-3939. 1 am again sorry that I cannot attend the BOS meeting. Sincerely yours, David Worthington 7/26/2006 .r - Page 2 of 2 7/26/2006 Page 1 of 2 M AY 1 7 2006 Susan Eddy From: Pam Russell [gprussell@hughes.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:21 PM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us; jbishop@co.frederick.va.us; cperkins@co.frederick.va.us; bsuchici@co.frederick.va.us; khenry@co.frederick.va.us Subject: FW: Glendobin proposal From: Pam Russell [mailto:gprussell@hughes.net] Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:49 AM To: 'rthomas@visuallink.com'; 'hpm@visuallink.com'; 'rmorris@shentel.net'; 'OatesGR@aol.com'; 'gkriz@visuallink.com.'; 'Iwfarm@shentel.net'; 'rours@su.edu'; 'gkerr@hallmechanical.net'; 'cmohn@oakcrestbuilders.com.' Cc: 'rshickle@shentel.net'; 'bosvanosten@aol.com'; 'garydove4@adelphia.net'; 'supervisorewing@yahoo.com'; 'gfisher@visuallink.com'; 'cdehaven@crosslink.net'; 'plemieux@visuallink.com'; 'jriley@co.frederick.va.us'; 'Kris Tierney' Subject: Glendobin proposal To: Planning Commission Members From: Pam Russell Re: Meeting 5/17/06 I have been going back and forth on whether to write you all regarding the meeting this evening. Then I decided that I really had nothing to lose. After the last meeting, I must say, I am somewhat nervous about the meeting for tonight. You see, I had no idea that there were people who would go to the extent of slandering us and using the volunteer work that I do in order to get their way. I have had a hard time with this. I realize that most of the people against this rezoning are used to getting their way, while we are used to following the rules. With this ground being in the UDA and with water and sewer availability, I don't have to tell you that we could be asking for more. We started off by trying to rezone a piece of ground that is in preservation. At the time of planning for Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision, we did not have the knowledge of it being in the UDA and our engineer at the time failed to point this out. So with trying to change that, we were proposing one acre lots, which is not normally heard of in the UDA and SWSA area. This was voted against so now we are trying our second option. Obviously, this does not make the people happy either. We have invested in a piece of ground that we had much bigger hopes for and now we are asking that you simply vote to approve the 45 lots that we are proposing. Please remember that this ground was in the UDA and the SWSA area when the residents of Glendobbin purchased their home. Proffers would be paid that would not have to be paid if this is not approved. I am very involved at school and I know that we have an overcrowding issue. We are going to have that regardless of this plan. Our county is growing and that is not a bad thing. Things get done where there is growth, and growth should happen in all areas of the county. I work very hard to raise money for the school that my son attends and I see first hand the needs of our schools. The school system could use that money. The number of students that this would add will not make or break our school system, it would just balance the growth a little bit. We understand that the future Route 37 bypass will be coming through there in some way. This has been in the planning stage for a very long time and the proposed way it is to go would not interfere with this plan. We would hope that you would not let this stand in the way of voting yes. This piece of ground is located on the end of Glendobbin Road which is near many different sized lots. Most of the residents would use Payne Road and Welltown Pike as means to go to work or shop. Wildlife would not be damaged, remember, we have 38 acres right beside it for them to go to. If safety is an issue now, then certainly it should be addressed. The speed limit should not be 55mph on that road, but this proposal does not effect that. It 5/17/2006 Page 2 of 2 only takes one person to speed to cause a wreck Since this subdivision would be next to the Industrial Park and the future 37 bypass, we certainly could not expect to build $800,000 homes and be able to sell them. So obviously, it would not be suitable to try for 2 acre lots that would normally sell for $175,000-$200,000 per lot. So we are trying to keep the lot size down so we could build moderate sized homes that would sell to the normal single family that perhaps might have to commute back and forth, yet could still afford a nice home. These homes would in no way bring down the neighborhood. A moderate sized home anymore is around a 2500 square feet. It would be a nice transition from the higher priced homes to the '/2 acre homes on Payne Road. We feel like we have tried to compromise and are trying to meet in the middle. We realize that you are faced with a difficult decision, however, if you take in consideration all of the facts in this matter, we feel that you would have no choice but to vote "Yes". Thank you for time and consideration, Pam Russell 5/17/2006 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's urith water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank- you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, M AY 1 6 2006 Fr I, el l 0 -7 1) P CA !.i !Ill i. HIII!!! i III !I I! lli fltltilfit l.i If !i. l! MAY 1 7 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote "Yes" to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available. I feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �S 2)Yt \/2 Vd 2 Z b O B. Salyer 341 Ambrose Dr. K'Wilnchester, VA 22603 rrea'erick Cove /0 % 1Vor l-� Kleoi V4 L-o m m 2zboI 1,ll1'1lllll 1 1111111111!111111!1111111 III III H it liililill May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Cominission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendebbin road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the U i water and sewer Available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in ths3t manner. Thank you for your con sick eration . Sinc ely, ��Ocv, t N . �Pr,- S+,-+ vt3zz_�o illililItill till III llll:Itllilltilililllll(Illttli:Illillt Id A M � v LU'UU May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the might to develop it in that. manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, n;.*- n •-- .. >-1 C, Z, 111111lilt irii), ill iitIll ilir�(11111J1rrlt11111tj'i�r1r11l1ii1 dip/)C i May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Frederick County planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 �/��. 1� � � �...•!'1•- 1 [ A � � � � �1 !j1 �1 f f �l ' j 1 I f !I May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. 1 understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, F M �' 1 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Z._= Q1' '"-�'K = m May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Corni-nission 107 North Kent Street Wmi Chester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, `j ------ ' -' '------- l n fIII '/'t'//i'H,III Hj/I/III m/U/fill /i,'niLI / May 8, 2006 Fredenck County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Giendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am m riting in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meetug to be held on May 1.7, 2006. i understand that the Russell's Plan to pay proffers on s money will go to our county for the pj rpose each lot approved and that thi of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the LTDA- so it seems ause�this Piece it would ai'to the P�-art � S benefit to receive these extra fimols- acquh'ed by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UIDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes ' to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your eonsldCraU0i1 in this matter. Sincerely, J PM iL P�C��1''�i C�L� fc5icn I NI Ci e May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am NNTiting in reference to the RusselUGlendobbin rezoning ineetug to be beld on May 1.7, 2006. i understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that tiis money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building, outside of the UTDA_ so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra fields. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the CODA, I feel that you should vote "Yel" to the Proposed 47 lot subdivision.. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 22Lo It f1dif till till III 111141111111ill It I lif if If I III! I 1i - 1 1111111 ,!.=Y 1 6 2006 Mav 3. 2006 Fredenck County FlanT"9 Commission 107 N. Vent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road 'Dear Gentlemen, 1 am NATiti3ag in Y'eference. to the RLssell/Glendobbin rezonha.g meeting to be proffers o held on May 1.7, 2006, i underst arFd tha�il e o tooilr cpou�ty forathe P't-Upaseoi each lot approved and that tsis raouey g of. S(;hools, fire department, ete. This extra money is notrea„ ei.vcd when b,ulding outside of the UDA_ so itseems that it would be. to the courxty's ty benefit to receive these eta fiords. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russe11's witb Nvater and sewer capability and because this ground is located witt.hin the C ��A> l feel that you should vote, "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your eons;dcration in this meatier. S iucerely, � R now ERPM PM 107 N . &nt 5t . `y_rcrr5tu VA ,col IIII!1!II!11111!II!I!!IIIIIIlrII1!!I 111111 l 1!! I I!!! I!! I I! 1! I!( �,7 1 6 M May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Ru:szsell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, "n16 C' -h1jecCL �tJ J m-i N , F PA vi-r C', 2a(�Oc {{ j JJ (f (jj j j t !( ( j {{ j It! hill 11 11 III !III It l l l III If If III l l l I Hill III [it I lillill fill[ May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 1.7, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, ,,,, ll, i, I, li,,,,,ll,i,i„fit :i,,,l,i,i,l MAY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, 1 am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as It is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. 1 believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, cis -f .4 - . _. -� - .. . .-w - -r `r -• .L. c. .a .6 - � _. a May 7, 2006 MAY 1 6 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, bro V) t�(�s 1))VtAr\ Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 I11I,1l1I1I,1111fill IIIIIIIIIIIII,,,IIHIIIIIIIII11hIIII I,I,I May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning CommIssion 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 1fIffil1111111111111fill 11111111ifIIII11I1J111111111,1111111i May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, I : I��e 5�-a � /t r- 'r rna z 1 I.i P n�1 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 •'7,. 1 2 ~ � .. -:r .y n .-. -7 - ' if I i1 It I if It III I III IIIIIII i111 [if I I I I III fill I III I I If 111111111 �1 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, A. A') V Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 * LL- a May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 It III it dill III fill I#111lIIllfl lit t If l IIIII III III l l fl l lit llll' I May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, /0V-? Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 1111111111111i1flit 1111if1111lif M,Ifill, 111111"111l0,14 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 il1l,I1II1ItIfill ifIffillII(II111Ifill r May 7, 2006 IY A" 1 6 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Plan 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 0 If fit ItIIfIfIII IIII 1III 1fit If11lit 1111tit IfItflit tIII ttifIfIfI May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �. �uon6,,— "'.�': r . Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 111l11!i�!�IiI11,I1!!1111l1111!lI!i!!!11!f!I!!11!!!!!!It! !! N U May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ■o pm Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 IfIififIIfIfIII Ifit IIIfIIifIfitIll III IIili!ifIIII IIiIIfifitIII May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. 1 understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 1�� �)O � � r Z4 - Ft e, C�I 'I b-i i Y, c. )-,O� e LJ 4 2-2--603 \ L / Frederick County planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 =.�_ �,_ = �_�1� �„i,►„r,i,r:„ri,,,,,,rr,r,r,rr„,„r�,i,r„rr,,,r,,,�,r,r,r J May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. 1 understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ; iwd6-*� R R PM Y�l Frederick Countv Plannin2 Cc)mmiqcie%n 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 4 n 4 -,! �� n -� -:1 r 0 -�., Z .;- L. Z. - -: - - - - *-- M7 - - : It I it it! If 11 HII lit I I I I I IllifiIIIIIIII t 0 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: ��, AY 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 w f May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: 1 6 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, c [M l Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 "' -'•``.-.~+ — —.7 I ifIIfifIIfifIII IIII III IIIII ifIfIII IIIIfit IfIfIIII IIII IIII ififI W May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ;fi "�j -1�q a'ax-zt Frick Co un alW Wi It Street p� ng Commission Va 22601 1111fill I I It [if if M 1111111111 fill III if 111111111111 If t,t t May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �) .,- C, r, 1 14 0 + -� Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 r May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �G4i'--41 h1,'J,e-. Lk', a�&�-)3 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ?�=1i:= _,•= %�=� i„i,i„1,1,11„Ii,,,,,,li,l,l,Il,,,,,1l,1,f„lf,,,l,,,1,1,1,1 M AY 1 6 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ': -,p,-- =•V,.j ;�u-I III If III IIII III iIIf III II[if lllf llfiff1[if if if fill f f if I f if if III f MtV ' May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Ill llt,lI,l1ll1fill Ill! INJII1ll111fill if Ildlifliffillifill May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am wTAing in reference to the Russeil/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. 1 understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, V �d4 y P le . - ..,-.-- _._,ems 1 Frederick County Planning COulnussion lo7 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ""' ''-0' ^Ar: 11111 ! !!JJ J! JJJJI! IJIJ I! J JIJ! r ��C. e- _'•=.: ,1.. � ,-,-z-1 II 3 1 it Illiti I i 1 bill 1 i it 1I1 fit ! t t May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ^- I -.::'. n, � f l 11 1► ff f l 11 11 I f I1' I I .. Li: 1— :.I iII f ,i,! , , 1, „1„! , , ! 1111! , , „ II l,! 1, 11, 1 1 May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, _ Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 ...��^: �••^•yt �^ _ It Ill iflifil III I HIM) Ills till 11111111111111 fill i llf 111111lli . 1 7 � �'' t� •^ � t t1 r May 7, 2006 1 6 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 � .. v °� s r'. S.• •= ^_ .�,illifil dillliI I iII H I I I Ili i !I I I I I i(i i! lI I liIII iI I IIll i It May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street MAY 1 6 Fpri Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russel l/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Y Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 21,fA _ -.F , -,.� ; 4. 1�=: 111 ' _ � ..r"�.'� -. -ter• 4 May 7, 2006 MAY 1 6 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, led Vv )C. Un �(�G� • Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 MAY 15 Z�106 J May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that yotj vote ' Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that. manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, C Yl toy �� ., yid �.�'b!ti!�• �ti �'� o1n•4• _t _S,■p s• E -r o_�- - - - ,r �Ja •t, " .1 .� _- * . _ _ i!Ili IlIII llill!lip ll!!!11!111; 111!!! 11111l III 111 1111 l 11! It Ili MAY 1 5 MW May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezonuig/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra binds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank- you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, ­4 Z ;.; ;�. _� � � '_- ;� : * .- '_'! III if 112 111 1 11 1 f III I I !If Ii I If I! III I If I III I! if I 11111 if If if I!If I N. May 8, 2006 M (%Y 1 5 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the coturty's benefit to receive these extra fiords. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot. subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 'D bey -- .. ,,- z # IfIiti111111111111111111111itIfII11111111111111IIIIitIIit1111i M AY 1 5 2006 May S, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbi.n rezoning meeting to be held on May IT, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra fiends. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this inatter. Sincerely,p, c� 1-39usLV. )- l-)L e j ) MWENIN5157261 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street WM' chester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel oiz Glendebbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thankyou for your consideration. Sincerely, yip„_ �."+Rhtt..H�tlxt: /?�lUt��•'�1- �^Rt•`HbA:.Y_..•' d i ^ _____ 1.� illilki,ii,.11i111„lli111,ll,t,{,li,l,l,,ilHill! All!i.l M AY 1 5 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning COm'UIsgtOY; 107 North Kent Street Win(;hester, VA 22601 Ref: Giendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the Parcel eiz Glendebbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Tl,an-k- you far VoOL r consideration. Sincerely, to fold P,JCx VA 20 6 f -G-1�r � �'I(-,- � 67 v y �. �L v IIIII III ti111111IIII IIIIIII t11111i 1111111111111111!1fill i 1 5 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Comixiissior; 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the parcel oiz C:l.encl.obbin Roadou vote- ves " to the belonging to the Russell's, groundwe ask that yis located in thetJDr� and leas proposal of 47 late. This water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's Should hare the right to develoP it in that manner. T;;ank you for VOLIr consideration . Sincerely, /r v� Cl- 1„111,11,iAltill ,,,:„1111,11111 I111111Hill11111 A11[111 M May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdiviaiors Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendc bbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote" yes to the has proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the U i nd water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank voil for your con aid eration . Sincerely, r `.-. 220 _�__�.-�.;:�_��:: �_�� 1,�Isl,�iEi,►1:�11,,,,{,il�l�i�ll,.,,,i�,1�1„li,�,l�,�l,iti,l w May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote "Yes " to the proposal. of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, i feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner_ Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, ; � 119"d -i-13ssncd WVJ QNV N3-19 POSTZ99evs oc:�7z 90eli1�0/so LM,b.- ��,; 1 -17 NO VA 220 tA, ;-,) &e i I:1I!11!I!1III I!I'!111"l'!111!1111!11111111 J I if!1 i!11fill i May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Co111-mission 107 N. Rent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning mecting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra fiiads. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot. subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this inatter. Sincerely, �ti NO 'VA 220 IV�O May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see frt to vote "Yes" to this proposal• with this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. i believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, 13 pJAY Pi-1 3 T 7CV`irk /� / /Ctvl�?rri5 �i✓Y� /Y% J e o .7 M) r g /,� e it � ` _T / ',, �- !11 !i 11! ltitill 31Illltil 11 IIllil i!!!I Il !it 1!!I II ! 111S!!f ltli i S 1 r 15 M May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Coma' sior, 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: 1n reference to the rezoning of the parcel oil Glen vb b`inR Road belonging to the Russell's, we ig located .d in UDr'1 anti teas proposal of 47 lots_ This gro water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should ha-Ve the right to develop it in thst manner. Tlsank you for our consideration . Sincerely, "q (aY;-t VY7 Fe-Q vp-4 fv eel May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. It is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is. It would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind met" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, S� f` USAIC 7' _•_7_��_ =' i�,t�i,sf�t�tl„t(��1�f�1(�f,t�lf,�,,.(I►(�t�,(l���f���(�l�I�i M AY 1 2 M May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbi.n rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extrafunds'. Because sewer capability �because �s s piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote -yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, LI ... -- �'K �� I!!11IfIIf ItIII ! III iI!IIIIfIIIt II11111 1 If I l 1!! 11!!! I!!! I! I! I!� MAY 1 2 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning COmmission 107 North. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Midge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that YOU vote " Yes " to the proposal. of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that. manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Fr,J,or;c,K yak"h I /�,*, -�- s i--- 167 Al VA wor��it5'�er f„f,l,ff,l?"fitIoffIIIlfillf,f„f,f„f,f,,,l,f„f,f�„tf,f M AY 1 2 M06 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as It is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would In return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind me!" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, ct � �c,TEf� c> p~- 67 �'� May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Dent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezonuig/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the coun ty's benefit to receive these extra funds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thant: you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, f .ti � �� t�C.' ., . J 2GJ� .1.1 S ,-.::a ~ .-.^ ' Itt�lllt�i �1�'!l��i!!tl1�1lit�tl�tllil��l'!�lt��lll�!!I�!!l�1� _____ iY'..'_ _ May 8, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Rezoning/Glendobbin Road Dear Gentlemen, I am writing in reference to the Russell/Glendobbin rezoning meeting to be held on May 17, 2006. I understand that the Russell's plan to pay proffers on each lot approved and that this money will go to our county for the purpose of schools, fire department, etc. This extra money is not received when building outside of the UDA, so it seems that it would be to the county's benefit to receive these extra finds. Because this piece of property was acquired by the Russell's with water and sewer capability and because this ground is located within the UDA, I feel that you should vote "Yes" to the proposed 47 lot subdivision. Thank you for your consideration in this inatter. Sincerely, P,,.�1C7 L. Ua. a �&Ol _ ==_y i,fl,ff,ld,ff111111"If,f,lfll„!IIIII lfil41111i!l1141f,i May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Comixiissior; 107 North Kent Street Wm ,hester, VA 22601 Ref: mendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the parcel oil Glendebbin Poad belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " yes " to the Proposal of 47 lots_ This Found is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should hale the right to develop it in thst manner. T"hatlk yoil for your consideration . Sincerely, Will L9-� '' -' tK.• _•.. � •� !!!)!II! It 1411! 1't!! t I I 111111' rlrrll'!'t �!!111!l1t1!'t l!i!1 Ir May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Comlxu8stori 107 North Kent Street Wmi chester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the Parcel oil Glen e bu � �P belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote proposal of 47 lots. This Found is located in the UDA and liar water and sewer available, 1 feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Tl,ank you for°otir consideration. Sincerely, MAY 1 1 M v M AY 1 0 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kant Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Rus&ell/Giendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see frt to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located In the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it is, it would be nice to have a local builder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mei" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, n� oK 5hiw vL b 4ri ce wow 3� ^Y 1 0 2006 May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In .reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendcbbin Road belonging to the Russell's, we ask that you vote " Yes " to the proposal of 47 lots. This ground is located in the UDA and has water and sewer available, I feel that the Russell's should have the right to develop it in that manner. Tl,all yotx for your con aid eration . Sincerely, �2� j OAAA-r� p IM k- Cc P lQ P, Yi) -:4 :- i-i -.� -4 1 1 1 1 ) I I I i ; i .1 * - � - --* - IP14H (1 1! 1!!1111! 1., 1 IjI i!l!f May 7, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 2601 Re: Russell/Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Sirs, I am writing to you in reference to the piece of property on Glendobbin Road that is currently up for rezoning on May 17, 2006. it is my hope that you will see fit to vote "Yes" to this proposal. With this ground being located in the UDA and having the access to water and sewer, I understand that proffers will be paid to help with the schools and with our county growing as it Is. It would be nice to have a local guilder able to do some of the building which would in return benefit many local businesses and their families. I believe that we have all heard the saying "Shut the door behind mel" Please don't allow this to happen, as there are many more families that could benefit from this plan. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, n L� .... W1.1 H. Hello Susan, I wish to weigh in on the Russel l-Glendobin request for rezoning (albeit a bit late). I for one am not against growth. I am against uncontrolled and unrestricted growth. Having grown up in Maryland in several areas of growth (Darnestown, Germantown & Middletown) I have seen good and bad approaches. Based on this the reduction in lot size, I feel, causes nothing more than a formula to overburden existing services and utilities. I do not think half acre to acre sized lots ensure good septic or water usage. I don't think tax revenues vs. the number of residents will support road, school or police and fire needs. I vote for keeping the existing 2- 5 acre zoning requirements. On a side note — I really think the area planning should take a realistic look at impact fees. I think present levels are woefully inadequate. Ten to twenty thousand would not have stopped me or anyone I know from buying a house in Frederick County. Especially when it is rolled into the price of a new house mortgage. The 60 to 120 extra cars on the road from this request alone, plus construction equipment — who would pay for the road wear and tear? 60 multi bedroom houses — at least 80% would have at least 1 child in school... more $$$. How about doing some real planning here. I think it is time to do some realistic evaluation of the cost of these endeavors and who is really benefiting. Thank You, Tom Shiben APR 1 M 1 9006 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. , Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 132 Ti!,On Drive 6` Wincbesw, VA 22603 �,•- ----. bb V4 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. APR 1 0 2006 Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. tzegctrds, CZ0 Q� t•.'.'..t�`�Wt �! t,t'_:,:�� rt_t':9?'r Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 r'�.• :.� }. = = � - 1 •L L Illl liilllillliilllli lli llti tll 1111111 llllli lilt llllll tl l l till To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. APR 1 r' 2006 Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rze9 a r- S, r 4. i Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 boo 4" 7 P 14 . 7i 4 .' Tempe & Francis Simon r7 .Pl 215 Greenfield Dr., Winchester, VA 2M3 t' C� 1ne 'R�i.�ee�. �a �,�Pa'o�a��C�e,�z`, `'IJJ:. j k; i,'::;: : jit it w ;l .111!: it i: To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. APR 1 2006 Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Kathy Babington 225 Clearview Dr. Clear Brook, VA 22624 U J'l �� r ; �l fX �L p m N' A"H 7 2006 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick Countyt.and jive in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area.6. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. r 4 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 USA 39 12006 Olympic Winter Games 10. March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: APR 1 0 20M In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote "Yes ". This nd the SWAB area and we feel ground is located in the UDA a that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, C. c � r'�. � March. 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: APR 1 " 2006 In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote "Yes ". his ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and feel T that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Page 1 of 2 Susan Eddy From: Dave Toth [dmtoth1@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 9A7 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us, cdehaven@crosslink.net Cc: dmtoth1@yahoo. corn Subject: RE: Glendobbin Rezoning Application #17-05 - DO NOT APPROVE!!! TO: Ms. Susan Eddy and Mr. Chuck DeHaven FROM: Dave Toth, resident of Frederick County / Apple Pie Ridge RE: DO NOT APPROVE THE GLENDOBBIN REZONING APPLICATION I am a resident of Frederick County - I live near the subdivision that the Russells are proposing on Glendobbin road. I just want you to know that I am strongly against this rezoning application. This application is not consistent with the surrounding community. This type of development is not conducive to building strong communities. I lived in a community that had a mix of densities within a small radius and can tell from experience that there was no sense of community built between the different densities. It had nothing to do with economic class as their were people in my neighborhood who were much less well off than some of the people in the smaller homes and townhomes nearby. There was a significant difference in priorities and a sense of care and responsibility for the surrounding land and environment. On an envioronmental impact level, when property is developed below about 2 acres, a completely different environmental dynamic occurs - the ground must be scraped clean and compacted, completely removing the vast majority of wildlife and native trees that live there. I moved here because Frederick County was different - in a great way. If we continue to develop in an intelligent, controlled, planned manner, we will continue the excellent quallity of life and environmental friendlieness Frederick County has to offer. Putting high density housing right smack in the middle of of Glendobbin road will seriously damage this. I noticed that the vast majority of the people at the April 5th hearing who were in support of the rezoning were doing so for monetary reasons - they wanted the business. Of course Mr. Russell is going to be a wonderful community figure to them - he signs their paychecks. Approving this rezoning application means giving in to greed and loopholes in the law/code that Mr. Russell's attorney is attempting to exploit to their fullest extent - namely the UDA boundary and waiver of the 10-year restriction on rezoning of preservation lots. Why was a preservation lot allowed to be created knowing that it can be removed without any restrictions? The preservation lot was a factor in several people dropping—$700,000 for their home - paying a premium for what seemd to be a guarantee on controlled development. This was very deceiving. Please make the right decision for the future of Frederick County and deny this application. Thank you, Dave Toth 4/18/2006 Page 2 of 2 1 dmtothl@yahoo.com 540-336-1211 Yahoo! Messenger with Voice. PC -to -Phone calls for ridiculously low rates. 4/18/2006 March 26, 2006 Frederick County Planning Cotarnission 107 N Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs, As a local business owner/manager, Y would like to express my opinion on the request for rezoning that is soon to be discussed at one of your meetings. We have done business with the Russells for many years and know that they are local builders and must say that we are all for keeping our local businesses above water. We understand that the ground they wish to rezone is in the UDA area, so it is an obvious area for growth. Considering this ground is very close to city limits, it seems to be a good area for a subdivision. So we ask that you vote "Yes" to the rezoning, as it seems to be the right thing to do for many reasons. Please support your local businesses. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, e 2 2 107 4,�� ;,, 1e, PG%- -- ..2�- Co C) March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Cj �� / ■ n�e -%LR k. pm 04 OR u I L III k u Freiert cl< Lotter �1it17.7 L-4 n-,m/5S art / I o 7 lVo r /-A k'e , -5 � -C s � r- 2 z - - - - - -- - - - March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, 12,,--,,, ,� �� NO VA 220 01 APR 200E PM 3 T M S S 's C 2 -2- L- e-) -4asr-)% 1 (+<"il % Ili I Ill 111111111 ill Ill lfill ll��liil�l'il 11111 l llI'l t tHIM I APR _ � `Vv J March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"I Sincerely, at ARM � m . .umnnN«. Illllli"'^`^111pIN1rA'r..1.N11U 1 ROOM..,IM11rrPWXMVlfl1 „ s J 1,I11111111,I111,111...Illlllllllillllillllill,Illllllllililliil 11 .,� t March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerer-, C / 2' D l APR 2tW-*b FIA .3 L (UCJ��]7`� 5`'/Ctnn n� C �rnrrr� SAS 1 ffd r V-6 )� . I w i / _ , & 0/ :G �/;C�L'�r'•=•��`1'� i�t"j�1, �It�f l!!it�3littl�lll!ll��!�IIIIIIlIIItl3iiltl��!f FI!El�7I!�il P March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, NO VA 220 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. 'thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, til Xif f: k 20tx-I f'r'1 - i- �•��ii-i ��_ ��1 i 11111111111111f11l1111#11111111 { March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 'k, , �;,� 4, J, " L e, lJ-7 /J, ILA,4 s 0i+!SCQ•B 0211 March. 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerer, �G�G March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"► Sincerely, 01 :voIA -P lR 200b Pt-1 3 L aI)1�••3 lr! !!!ltitlll!ll!lr!,!l1!lrirllllll!llrl!�!rllrrrf!!rlll!l!l aF[.•��.��- March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planting Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, 4� M10 vlk.220 Ol '21006 3 L - ).-- Z & U / I March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, "� . .� 01 APR 2006 PM IT %`�"`�`.. • a March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells, I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero.1 Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, /' �' -ice ^ILI-�ti, `��(Lzl - 111 It l I Ill l Ill loll l lloll 111 l llllllllllll 111 Ill 11111111111 IIIII LL .l I March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: MY In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincere y, _51 NO VA 220 01 APR .'tklb PM i T a rjuc&z�x 7- 6oJ 2-2 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town peopie. and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes'1 Sincerely, 7,� idLl VA Q 4� J • —42E `•i ' 3 IIIIIIllflllfill IIIIII IIII evil I11l1:1l,ifIII March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Clendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Clendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr_ Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"I Sincerely, / r �A�'w.,�a�wiC .y.�+ March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"I Sincerely, f,,' L7 VA 220 01 APR 2006 PM 3 T March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning COMMIsion 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, 1 am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there is about this, but what I do know is that this property is looted In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, .. . ........... NO V A Oi APR MC�G PM i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote "Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerer-, /•✓ � � � ,� * � � -� �v �� �o� ���� ��� ��� .� = t i i i t t i I t i 1 t t t 1 1 i i 1 ''=-• zt= _•_ :(�z(rt}tf=lr�l;�rft�tiEi�i�f�tt�l!:ElFII=.f;fs;�(�!=.It�s!!f}��! March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601. Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes") Sincerely, ■ . P/0 rlhlh� �Ol�'7�1• c�t�h 1 c �11nc heS4,e-r I VP : '?D (.0oI Illlt�ltllilIIItI'liit!!II}11llliti!!llltlfIll Ill 1111If Wild March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes "_ This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, r rec\1erick (oLln4,i Ootiri,,,S /011 0()rq� K,,4 ,StY,-ee,- w, n (ti eS4,v I UWl j D661 s� J t l l t i t l I t t 1 i i 1 • -�_ _ _ .. _ = =�_ t„nr,:f,i,fr„fr,,,:,:fr:f,f,fr,,,,,fr,r:r::fr,,:f,,,r,r,f,r March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, c lc (Q,C.c F/L-.e Jelzkc-lle- ti t i t t f ))s ))s i{ t i s JJt i s )t t t if s t _ _ - .. _ _•_ 1 itfl11t1ififitiIthI!III II?ifitIIIIIIIIiIifIIIItiI!if!IIIif{If March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 10.7 N Kent Street Winchestet, Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On Aprll 5,h, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground Is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as 1 can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, It should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, / '� IA O lit; 220 Cc rL'.G�.r��1'�f �����•3 �Sf�i��i�l�i��tl��lilili��i�f�{��lIHl��l�1�2l��lil�lff�l�i�!� March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. OR , .111 fit, VA 2120 ..y20 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, c C r ia� ,tip keC ka,��4 f ,,+ 01 APR .ZL) x-j Psi .3 L (CW 441' v :�:�.,�� ��•,e- ���""1'3 �„I,�„�,is�r„ii,,,,,,��,i,isii,u„i�,�,i„iiu,i„��,t:�t( March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what 1 can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. 1 can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about'? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am 1 missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, �` r�41 J,d�'-t Cc, "'� 2 March 27, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern: I am writing you with great concern about the upcoming meeting dealing with the rezoning off Glendobbin Road for the Russells. I am a Sub -contractor and have worked with the Russells for many years. Knowing that this ground is in the UDA, I was surprised to hear that the Russells were only planning to apply for 62 lots. Then the real surprise came when I heard of all the opposition from the surrounding neighbors about this. Obviously the neighbors wouldn't be happy with any number unless it was Zero! Do they realize that Mr. Russell has the right to ask for 3-4 lots per acre when the ground is in the UDA and SWAB area? Please inform the public what the UDA means and that Mr. Russell is being more than fair by asking for only 62 lots. Furthermore, we have so many out of town contractors that come in and build house, using out of town people and materials. The Russells use local businesses for materials and labor. Would't it be nice to support the local people? Please vote "Yes"! Sincerely, _,q� " M y' /~�`� Y- �� ; �����i � VJIi �= _ _ . - _ _ _ : i;:isi�;isi�ii:�ii�<<,,�li�i�i�ii:���=1i:i:i::ii:;;i,::i:i�i=i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Gle.ndobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote "Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerer-, 0; �� �rPcler ice vi�cl Ct1e,S-�r , V4 of �(o0� 1!!t!r!!i!Itl(!!If!!!!i!i(!i!i!1f!!!!!Ii!i!(!!Ii!!IiIIIi!iiiI March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, tK- V4 D�&)q R PM n ri, �)I If N: I i i 1: h i March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Sirs: In reference to the rezoning of the parcel on Glendobbin Road belonging to the Russells, we ask that you vote " Yes ". This ground is located in the UDA and the SWAB area and we feel that the Russells should have the right to develop it in that manner. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, �� �' c I� �� . i I QI n i Vl� C'c'Y'I 61) i S S cr 71 I_ L ��d 4-f / G'`1 � �j d r `t a�cif i }},t,r, ! i!3li!J I3fi! WN March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commision 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Va 22601 Re: Gledobbin Ridge Subdivision To Whom It May Concern, I am just a concerned citizen who has listened to the many comments about the rezoning request that has been made by Mr. and Mrs. Russell. I may not know every fact there Is about this, but what I do know is that this property is located In an area that is zoned UDA. And it also has water and sewer availability. From what I can understand that means something totally different from your normal regulations in the county, meaning the 5 acre rule. I can understand why this parcel may have been put in the UDA at one time, since It Isn't that far out of town and there are some heavy housing right down the road on Payne Road_ What I don't understand is what all the fuss is about? If the ground is in the UDA and has water and sewer, doesn't the Russells have the right to build under the UDA guidelines? Am I missing something? I have to believe that our local government is fairer with our regulations than this. Please vote yes. Sincerely, ti PAIX4644' �.�-�''�+a�!�=1u.e �tlll�lt�l�l� I!�ff!aft}�ri�f�t�flii3i�lii3�fi31�f!!Itll�!�!13 March 25, 2006 Frederick County Planning Commission 107 N Kent Street Winchestet. Va 22601 Re: Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision Dear Gentlemen: On April 5th, you will hold a meeting to decide whether you should rezone ground off of Glendobbin Road in order for the Russells to be able to develop. This ground is in the UDA and the SWAB area. As far as I can tell that means that the ground in question should be allowed to be developed since it was set aside for just that. With water and sewer availability, it should also have the capability to have several lots per acre. I believe Mr. Russell is asking for 60 lots, which is equal to one lot per acre. That is a lot less than he could ask for. I would hope that our local government is fair enough to see this and realize that even though some of the surrounding neighbors may be against this, they may also sell their home next month. Where would that leave the Russells? Please do the right thing and vote yes. Sincerely, 16",u �6c (� yrC� V4 �-DJ661 __ _ = � = = _ _:'j i�sltt�=t,l:�tF,�f����:��(tl�li�fit�lt�►fi�►tirfi��t�rrfi�f�2i 1 cw/yyl 04!05i2006 10:48 5405366464 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, PAIN MANAGEMENT I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than, preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area_ • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will. add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. PAGE 01 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.2gi20s, JIvMr. James R. Russell ^ 595 Glendobbin Rd. Winchester, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 cn. To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.e� a rol BILL & JANET OWEN 360 GLENDOBBIN RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 . �+ -- _.- �'• .; • j??{?i??iiiiEi?3{i?3???Ili3;?i?1iF33.311?!3i?I,a??3i: ii?li :; To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. BILL & JANET OWEN 360 GLENDOBBIN RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22603 -z. = Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 � = Pm a- To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec�aY-L{S, 1 6 0 .4PPl-e Pe- R d�e PC/ C7,7_1 The Lilly Family SM Apple PIG RM9- Rd. Winchester, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. tze9 a ras, WE Aq r'fp � D k sum -nH ic-, �IlaJ f'ST 15 %N Ito rlt�WtiN,� ft"At Lbq\E�� j�X Mr. Carl A. Rettenberger O� G 116 Windy Pine Lrn C Winchester, VA22603-3274 uv Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 1zegarL(S' S � 94�Fa�t � c226d3 Steven Daphne Bageant 511 Golds Hill Rd. Winchester, VA 22603-3138 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Page 1 of 1 Susan Eddy From: Diane Kearns [didi@shentel.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 2:22 PM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: Russell-Glendobbin Hey Susan Just formally noting Fruit Hill's opposition to this rezoning: RP next to orchard with no setback, (shouldn't be an option), doesn't fit in with neighboring property, technically able but shouldn't be requesting rezoning on set aside so soon. All the things we spoke of last night Thanks.... since everyone seemed to think it would go absolutely no where I didn't bother Gary with it. Diane 4/4/2006 Page 1 of 3 Susan Eddy From: Cindy Lee [gsslee@ntelos.net] Sent: Monday, April 03, 2006 11:28 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Date Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved" Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would 4/3/2006 Page 2 of 3 make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Michael & Cynthia Lee 121 Quaker Lane Winchester, VA 22603 4/3/2006 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, '' 3 ze-v6 `-DS RZ I am a resident of Frederick County and live ' e e I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because As yok. XAV%_t_ • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Yd "r r`evi eo oil( 7�`e- 7c �-v �jI �o✓�� 1:t/I-e�G�O.�c�W°fo� �f1� Tl�-- Do.-J�i J'sF�l' Q r-e / n Con S>S 7�.-i f Gv � 7 i� .Sdy rroa.��y✓ rze� a rc(s, _ r/ ��ncito✓r r V4 2-Z603 6r /f Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Page 1 of 1 Susan Eddy From: Kimberly [kimsalata@myway.comj Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 9:12 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Cc: cdehaven@crosslink.net Subject: Glendobbin rezoning Importance: High Greetings I am writing to record my opposition to the proposed rezoning in any form of the Russell property off Glendobbin. My family and I will be at the hearing next week but I wanted all of you to know the depth of my concerns. I spoke with Ms.Eddy at the last meeting and spoke with Mr. DeHaven at my home about this issue while he was campaigning for election. We moved to our home on Wilton Drive because the area retained a rural, limited development feel. We were told that all future housing in the area would be on 5 acre lots. We looked at property in Oakdale Crossing and Meadow Branch and did not want a high density housing environment, no matter how costly the homes. This remains our view. Currently the roads are not designed to handle increased traffic. Glendobbin is dangerous in the mornings and evenings with work and school traffic. The fences along the road are hit by speeding cars AT LEAST once or twice per year. We cannot allow our children to walk or bike to friends homes and this situation would only worsen with new high density construction. The schools in the area are at capacity now. Resources are limited and cannot handle the rapid expansion that a dense neighborhood would bring. I volunteer every week just to help meet the minimal needs of the students, and fear that any additional stress to the system would negatively impact the quality of the education provided. As it is, the students are already sharing computers and headphones and don't always have the essentials. Finally, I must also express my displeasure at the system which allows the Russell's to constantly "change" and "amend" their proposal with words but not really the essence of what they want to do. A rose is a rose is a rose. The latest ploy to request only "half' the land to be developed is so transparent. We know that the plan is to wait till things quiet down and then push the remaining land to be densely developed as well. We are not stupid. A final ruling needs to be made so that this issue is settled once and for all. We have a tight community, all the neighbors talk. I have not heard a single resident of the area support this proposed development. 100% are opposed. Please respect the intentions of the original development plan to keep a rural feel to our area. Sincerely Kimberly H. Salata, MD Winchester Musculoskeletal Medicine, PLC No banners. No pop -ups. No kidding. Make My Way your home on the Web - http://dell.myway.com 3/30/2006 • • Page 1 of 2 Susan Eddy From: Jon Miles Dmileswinchester@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 11:11 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved" Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and 3/29/2006 • • Page 2 of 2 just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Jon M. Miles 3/29/2006 • • Page 1 of) Susan Eddy From: Toth, David M [david.m.toth@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 9:41 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Cc: Toth, David M Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. This type of zoning is counterproductive to building strong communities. I lived in such an area of mixed zoning and have experienced poor community development and high crime first-hand. One of the reasons I moved my family here is because zoning was more consistent and, as a result, the feeling of community has been excellent. I am not against urban and high -density development - it is necessary to provide afforable housing and infrastructure to the masses. However, placing high- densitiy housing in the middle of rural -suburban development is poor zoning. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. If this area is set aside to be a preserve, then why is it even an option to rezone this? Developing on preservation parcels sets a bad precedent that this can be a regular practice - essentially making "preservation" meaningless. I would like the county to look carefully at the reasons this and other preservation parcels are established in the first place. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would 3/29/2006 • Page 2 of 3 result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. Regardless, the VDOT estimated impact needs to be recalculated based upon the new zoning request - approving this request without that updated impact from VDOT would be making a decision without accurate data. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Dave Toth and The Toth Family 3/29/2006 New Page 0 Page 1 of 2 Susan Eddy From: iona benoit [iona_benoit@yahoo.com] Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2006 9:19 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: glendobbin rezoning Date Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What 3/28/2006 New Page 0 Page 2 of 2 40 I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, David Benoit The Benoit Family 3/28/2006 Page 1 of 2 Susan Eddy From: robert bower [rlbower00@hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 26, 2006 2:22 PM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: rezoning application, #17-05 of Russel-Glendobbin Date Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have been a resident of WellTown Acres II since 1990. The rural aspect of the area surrounding Glendobbin was the factor which attracted me to build a home and live in this area. Therefore this request for rezoning concerns me greatly. I have several concerns about this rezoning request First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites (including WellTown Acres II) or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. There are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not 3/28/2006 • • Page 2 of 2 necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Robert L. Bower The Bower Family 3/28/2006 • • Susan Eddy From: Katz [mail2katz@yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:22 PM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner Ms. Eddy, We write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin and to respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. We have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre homesites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A- 16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout us is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it i late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is submitted with the request. which would make things a we mean is that there is a submitted. What this means to built out and just way too in the "non -proffered" layout Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will sqaush all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the 1 land, putting up a new * on what was supposed to be a Ovate drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, we would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Bradley and Rama Katz The Katz's 304 Union View Lane Winchester, VA 22603 cell: 443-801-4953 email: mail2katz@yahoo.com Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 2 • is Page l of 2 Susan Eddy From: Walkd@aol.com Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 1:12 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning March 24, 2006 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier 3/24/2006 0 40 Page 2 of 2 this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes, looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. Furthermore, what really seems unfair, is that the developers are already clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed. They seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents out here don't count? That this rezoning request is just a formality that they are so sure of getting it muscled through? It is really discouraging to see that happening out there when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Finally, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge! These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Daniel L. Walker The Walker Family 311 Union View Lane - (home under construction) 3/24/2006 April 2, 2006 Frederick County Zoning Board Dear Members, We understand that you are soon to decide upon a zoning issue which will have wide-ranging effects upon the future of Frederick County. As new residents here, we admittedly do not fully appreciate the history of building development and planned growth here. Obviously there will be growth, as this county remains an attractive place to live. There are jobs here and jobs which can be accessed by 1 to 2 hours drive. There is a fine Medical Center here, and so on... In the case of the proposed high -density development on Glendobbin, we are very concerned. The huge stresses which would be placed on the current infrastructure (roads, schools, emergency facilities) make a vote for liberal re -zoning an unwise thing to do. Keep the current zoning ordinances and do not relax the rules on lot size. Keep the schools, roads and infrastructure ahead of the population growth. Do not allow our neighborhood to become over -run. Sin ely� �l Dwi jht and Sherr/Kemp �06 1jjitl t l ld �9 oQ w-d.1 t/4 APR 4 2006 ~ • 3/28/2006 Page 1 Harley and Roxie Ostlund 328 Union View Lane Winchester, VA 22603 Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Attn: Susan K. Eddy, Senior Planner 107 North Kent St. Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Russell — Glendobbin Rezoning Application #17-05 MAR 2 g 200r, The purpose of this letter is to express our opposition to the application to rezone 67.7242 acres in the Glendobbin/Apple Pie Ridge area from RA (Rural Areas) to RP (Residential Performance). Please refer to the Russell-Glendobbin Property Rezoning Impact Analysis Statement dated March 2006. Once we have completed outlining our objections to this statement, we will address our additional concerns. Page 1: Introduction - Paragraph 1: The applicant states that the existing Glendobbin Ridge development consists of 2 acre parcels when in fact, the size of the 16 lots range from 2 to 4 acres. The statement made by the applicant that the proposed development will provide a "transition from the more intensive land uses within the Stonewall Industrial Park to the low density residential pattern" surrounding this area is at best, inaccurate. A better term may be ludicrous. The vast majority of the surrounding area is orchard, farm land and open tracts of land. The Industrial Park is unobtrusive to this area. As residents, let us reassure you we have never considered high density housing an appropriate buffer between low density single family dwellings and apple orchards. We find this statement offensive to the intelligence of the citizens in this community. Page 1: Introduction - Paragraphs 2 & 3, Page 2: Comprehensive Policy Plan — Paragraphs 1-5 We are now aware of the exception that preservation parcels within the UDA can apply for rezoning prior to the 10 year division restriction. Please note that homeowners within this community were specifically told the preservation lot could NOT be subdivided for 10 years, and even then it would be an exception. The builder who purchased the land from the Russells either didn't know of the exception, or lied to us all by omission. Many, if not all of us chose to purchase here specifically for the rural nature of the area. Indeed, the requirement for rezoning consideration of a preservation lot is that the proposed development is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in effect. Therefore, a major factor in this matter is just that: "Is the proposed development consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan in effect?" The applicant wants us to all to believe it is. Here are the reasons listed: I . The CPP expressly calls for suburban residential uses to predominate within the UDA. 2. In the absence of a designated use as set forth in the Eastern Frederick County Long Range Land Use Plan, determination of land usage should be left to each individual property owner to decide what is best for him alone. 3. The area in question is "transitional." 4. High density homes will compliment the area. • • 3/28/2006 Page 2 5. High density homes will foster a dynamic housing market. 6. Glendobbin should not be considered the "Apple Pie Ridge Road area" solely because it partially falls within the SWSA. In response to this, we say, "No, the proposed development is not consistent with the goals of the current Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons:" 1. There is currently discussion regarding moving the UDA line. It is our understanding that the area in question is included in the research and evaluation currently underway and there is the possibility that it may, in fact, be taken out of the UDA. It seems prudent to wait until a final revision of the UDA is in place before considering this request. 2. Large growth in Frederick County seems likely over the next several years. It is wonderful to know that the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors are taking seriously their responsibility for managing growth in a well -thought out, organized, researched and defined manner. That is why we argue that in the absence of a designation, danger lies in allowing individuals to interpret the CPP and to determine what is best. The applicant aside, when millions of dollars are at stake, individuals tend to choose what is best for them, regardless of the best interests of the community. In this particular case, we hope that you will agree that the proposed development is not in the overall best interest of this community. 3. As previously discussed, this is not a transitional area. The apple orchards are the most appropriate transition away from the industrial park. 4. Talk to your friends and family, co-workers and out-of-towners and ask them what makes Winchester unique? What is their favorite area in Winchester? If they could live anywhere here, where would it be? Hands down, they'll say "the Apple Pie Ridge area." Apple Pie Ridge represents "the Sunday drive, the Virginia country, the American dream." It is precisely the beauty of the area, the attractiveness of the large homes on acreage, and the trees and rolling hills that makes this community unique. What makes this area so special is arguably the lack of high density, look at your eight neighbors out your kitchen window, suburban developments found in every town and city that this request is for. 5. Are we currently in need of a more `dynamic housing market?' How will this application foster one? Not convinced. 6. The SWSA does not determine the community's definition of a neighborhood. That is just silly. Glendobbin Road is as much a part of the Apple Pie Ridge Road area as Butler Estates, Green Springs, and other developments adjacent to Apple Pie Ridge Road are. The argument could be made however, that the creation of high density homes in this area will result in Glendobbin being known as the "downfall of, indeed the sell -out, of Apple Pie Ridge." Page 3 — Suitability of the Site: B. Location and Access — Paragraph 2 "A secondary point of access will be established for emergency vehicles through the existing Glendobbin Ridge Subdivision." As the 3`d iteration of this proposal, within the past year the Russell's have attempted to pave and dedicate this easement to the County, they have attempted to use it as a secondary entry into their proposed development, and are now stating its new use as emergency access. That's a lot. Be advised that they are not the owners of the easement land. If you have not yet received a letter from our attorney on this matter, one will be forthcoming shortly. There is no further need to comment on this issue here. • • 3/28/2006 Page 3 Page 4 — Suitability of the Site: D. Traffic — Paragraph I Traffic patterns in this area are already at bottleneck proportions during certain times of the day. First, Apple Pie Ridge Road is heavily congested before and after school hours and Glendobbin Road is used as a major thoroughfare for high school students commuting to and from school. Second, the traffic exiting Interstate 81 onto Rt. I 1 has become so congested between the hours of 3 p.m. and 7 p.m. that cars are at times stuck stopped on the freeway, attempting to exit. In addition, Apple Pie Ridge Road and Glendobbin Road are 55 mph zones. Traffic often exceeds the limit on these narrow, windy rural roadways. To make matters worse, the entrance to Union View Lane is located such that the sight line for intersecting traffic is only 150 ft! The line of sight for the proposed new entrance off of Glendobbin Road is equally as short. This limited distance requires extreme caution when turning onto Glendobbin Road. More traffic will exacerbate the problem. Having stated these current concerns, this application indicates the proposed development will increase the average daily car trips by 1300! What exactly does that mean to existing homeowners living in and around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Payne, and Welltown Roads? Well, given that most car trips occur between 6 am, and 9 pm, that averages out to 86 more cars per hour or an additional 1.5 car trips a minute. In other words, if this proposal goes through, there will be no more days of peaceful, country living for these neighborhoods. Instead, the existing homeowners will spend their time at stop signs trying to catch a break in traffic remembering the `good old days' when a car didn't pass every 40 seconds: Yes indeed, every 40 seconds. Additional comments While we have now fully outlined our objections to the March 2006 proffer statement and request for rezoning, there are additional concerns and comments we would like you to consider as follows: 1. School system: It is over capacity as it is. The instant addition of a whole neighborhood of students will overburden the teachers and the school administration. This type of growth results in a lower quality of education for existing students as well as the newcomers. 2. Neighborhood impact: This subdivision of 60 homes will immediately almost double the number of homes currently built in this area. Lot layout: The applicant has not provided a proffered proposal, nor accounted for the total 67.7242 acres. As you are aware previous requests were made but withdrawn, attempting to put 130 homes on 15000 sq ft lots. The current request is for 60 homes on 20,000 sq ft lots. Given there is a total of 67.72 acres, 58 homes on 20,000 sq ft lots, plus 2 homes each on 3.6 acres (see Impact Analysis Statement, page 4, E. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply — Paragraph 2), plus an estimation of 7 acres allotted for roads (see note) accounts for 40.83 acres. With all roads in place, 26.89 acres is left unaccounted for. That's a lot of undeveloped property. Hmm, that's even enough to get about 58 more homes on 20,000 sq ft lots at a later date. The non -proffered layout submitted with this application means exactly nothing. It cannot even be considered for discussion or comment. Furthermore, the Russell's have not allotted for setbacks, screenings, buffers or fences for adjacent property owners. They have not indicated how new homes backed into orchards impacts the integrity of the existing environment and working farms. They have not demonstrated how new homes built on the hill adjacent to and directly below Glendobbin Ridge lots 3-7, 9, 10, 13, 16 will affect the current homeowners who have view property. How will clear cutting the hill and putting up new homes affect drainage issues and runoff waters from these steep lots? What size and kind of homes are they intending to • • 3/28/2006 Page 4 build ... Smaller tract housing ... Large $500K homes that in effect really won't offer consumers the alternative they proposed? (*Note: 7 acres for roads estimated by using the 2.8876 acres dedicated for the existing Union View Lane, then multiplying by 2.5.) 4. The Russell's have not yet been able to prove their ability to supply 2 separate means of access to the proposed development. 5. It is our stance that this development will not help but in effect, harm existing property values in this area. From all accounts, it appears the new development will place homes next to industrial facilities and backed into the Route 37 connection resulting in an undesirable neighborhood location. 6. Applicant Behavioral History — This applicant has made a lot of assumptions along the way. From the beginning, the applicant has acted as if this process has already been completed. It began in October 2005 when one day he came and bulldozed a 50 ft swath of old growth trees, pushed through a substantial sized road, laid crushed gravel and prepared to pave. He didn't talk to the adjacent homeowners who actually own the land rights; he just did it. While the road in place was not 50 ft wide, it was at the time adequate for his large farming machinery. It is now a mess and looks terrible. Due to construction debris left by G&M Homes, there was a period this past winter where the road was difficult to traverse. The applicant repeatedly drove on our property to get through, and most recently ran a bulldozer on top of our drain field. The numerous proposals, along with withdrawls and postponements, as well as inaccuracies and errors in the proposals have frustrated and angered the surrounding community. Furthermore, despite the Planning Commissions strong advisement to hold a community meeting before the April 5t' meeting, no such attempt was made. This past week there was once again a flurry of activity on the part of the applicant. As if you had already approved the proposal, the applicant punched the road back through and added his access gate. With the new gate in place, cars and trucks without gate access now turn around on our property. Again, we've witnessed them backing onto our drain field in order to turn around. Given this history, we have concluded that unfortunately the applicant is not interested in anything but a hostile resolution. As fellow community members and adjacent property owners, we have felt completely dismissed, disregarded, and disrespected and therefore have surmised that the Russell's have no intention of compromise, no intention of relationship and no intention of considering anyone other than themselves. Given these strong objections, we respectfully ask you to deny this rezoning application. i cc: Planning Commission To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, ' I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT t onsistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborh000ds already in this area. • • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic iri the -area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec� a �-ds, IT U ,-.4 -4 Archie s Patty Houser 4 173 MMon Dr. Winchester, VA 22603-3319 4-1 Y.b —rep, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Page 1 of 1 Susan Eddy From: frank scheder [psche@visuallink.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 6:42 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Dear Susan: This proposal cannot be ok'd because of several issues: 1st and foremost the water issue which at this moment is affecting Frederick county. The second is the traffic issue which will really affect us and the third is the acreage on which houses are to be built would set a precident which would effect everyone in the future. This has to be defected!!!!!!! 4/5/2006 Page 1 of 1 Susan Eddy From: KATHY EUBANK [keubank@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 4:19 PM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us Subject: Glendobbin Rezoning Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Spring Valley Estates which adjoins the Russel l-Glendobbin parcel being considered for rezoning. I object to the Russel -Glendobbin rezoning because of several reasons. One, it is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. Second, part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. Third, depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. Fourth, it will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more children to a school that is already full. Because of the reasons above and the fact that this type of development is not appropriate for this area I urge you to deny this request for rezoning. Sincerely, Andy Eubank 4/5/2006 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzeq a KA" IV N So la ta 132 Wilton Drive Wjr.c&ster, VA 24-603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 March 30, 2006 M Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning & Development 107 N. Kent St., 2"d Floor, Winchester, VA 22601 Ms. Eddy, APR 5 ?� My name is J.P. Darlington and I am writing to you to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, 917-05 of Russell- Glendobbin. I own land adjoining two sides of the Russell property in question. I have three hundred acres which consists of 51 5- acre lots and a 45- acre parcel on which I live. All of this land is part of Spring Valley Estates. My land extends from Rt. 37 to large lots along Glendobbin Rd. I have a number of concerns and objections to this request for rezoning. First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to land owned by me and the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently purchased their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It is my opinion that even though the current UDA would double the value of my property I feel that the UDA is inappropriate for this area and should be lifted. �i r Third, high density communities do not exist in this area, what is being proposed will reshape this entire community and pave the way for more of this type of development. Fourth, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge, and Rt. 522. Fifth, VDOT estimates a traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Rd., Payne Rd., Welltown Pike, and Apple Pie Ridge. These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is already flooded with the surge when school lets out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Pike to the east and Apple Pie Ridge to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons,. - In closing I urge you to deny this request for rezoning because the proposed high -density subdivision is not compatible with the surrounding area and would create serious traffic issues. Sincerely, ..] April 4, 2006 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I write to you this evening to formally express my concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. I have several concerns about this rezoning request; First, the requested land use is inconsistent with the surrounding area. The proposal for less than 1/2-acre lots would be adjacent to the Glendobbin Ridge Rural Preservation Subdivision, created in 2002, which contains two- to five -acre lots and a large set -aside parcel which together meet the RA zoning of the area specifying an average density of one home per five acres. Most subdivisions along Glendobbin Road, inside of the UDA, contain lots of five acres or even greater. Most other parcels in the immediate vicinity are zoned RA and contain either five -acre home sites or large orchards. Second, the Preservation Parcel, the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16) established in 2002, should remain "preserved". Families in the adjacent Glendobbin Ridge subdivision recently bought their lots with the expectation that the set -aside parcel would remain that way. Also, it seems clear that the UDA line in this area of the Stonewall District seems to follow no natural boundaries nor follow any zoning logic. It does not follow the line of the SWSA as it does in other areas of the county. Third, in the rezoning request, this requested high -density subdivision adjoins the industrial park so there is a real concern about the likelihood of running a street into the industrial park which would result in a mix of residential and industrial traffic through the industrial park as well as through residential areas for cut over access to Glendobbin, Apple Pie Ridge and Rt. 522. Speaking of the layout, there are also some unknown factors which would make things a whole lot worse if this rezoning request goes forward. What I mean is that there is a non -proffered -- a not -guaranteed -- sample housing layout submitted. What this means to me is "what you see is not necessarily what you get" and that the reality -- when it is built out and just way to late to do anything about it -- could be worse than what is in the "non -proffered" layout submitted with the request. Also, as you know, the original request last year in September and earlier this year in February was for 130 homes. The original request from last year showed 60 homes to be built in year one of the development, then 60 homes to be built in year two and 10 homes the last year. Based on that past history, this new request for 60 homes looks suspicious. Does it mean the real layout that actually gets built will squash all the first year homes together to leave room for more homes in the future? If so, then this would seem like it's just the same old request dressed up in a new disguise. By clearing the land, putting up a new gate on what was supposed to be a private drive at the end of Union View Lane, tearing down and widening the road there and laying gravel to prep for a road bed, the developers seem to be acting as if approval is a foregone conclusion. Does that mean that the opinions of the residents don't count? The developers are acting as if this rezoning request is just a formality that they are sure of getting muscled through. It is really discouraging to see that happening when the Board of Supervisors has not even seen the request yet. If the request is denied, will they be required to plant mature trees back in the easement there and take up the gravel road bed and plant grass again? Fourth, VDOT estimates a possible traffic increase of an additional 1300 trips daily on Glendobbin Road, Payne Road, Welltown Pike and Apple Pie Ridge. These additional trips are on top of the already existing traffic and a lot of this additional traffic would happen during the worst times when the road system out here is flooded already with the surge when schools let out and work shifts change. As it is the access to this area off of Welltown Road on the east and Apple Pie Ridge Road to the west is backed up in the mornings and afternoons. And traffic is already constant through out the day. An additional 1300 trips, most of which will happen during the busiest parts of the day, will have a very noticeable impact on the area. In addition the construction of a possible 130 homes in a short period of time would likely dramatically increase the number of students in our already overcrowded schools adding to the tax burden on citizens of Frederick County. As long time area residents, we are sick and tired of seeing virtually automatic approval of high density subdivisions granted before the infrastructure to handle the increased population is in place and with little thought of the impact on area the quality of life. If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, I would respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, Jane & Bob Wever 2607 Apple Pie Ridge Road Winchester, VA 22603 April 5, 2006 Frederick Co. Plannin� Department 107 N. Kent Street, 2" Floor Winchester, Va 22601 To Whom It May Concern: We would like to take the opportunity as taxpayers and voters in the area to write this letter in consideration of new zoning and future developments particularly affecting the Apple Pie Ridge area, specifically the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning issue, as well for the future growth in all of Frederick County. We moved to Apple Pie Ridge Road because of the unparalleled natural beauty and also its close proximity to the city. Daily, we enjoy seeing student athletic groups running from James Wood High school down Apple Pie Ridge and also watch the many bicycle groups ride these beautiful roads. As traffic is getting heavier we are increasingly concerned how long before this will be a thing of the past. Whatever is decided tonight and in future zoning meetings will set a precedent for further developments and forever change the landscape of our great community and of this area as a whole. This will not only affect our families' lives but future generations. The Shenandoah Valley has an amazing history and unique beauty that is solely its own. We, as landowners, taxpayers and voters have a responsibility to not only recognize but make sure that the heritage and quality of life in this area will continue. Without planned growth and good land management we will waste these resources that were left here by our forefathers. We believe new developments need to accommodate future infrastructure. Large residential areas on small plots put burden on the taxpayers by traffic increase on roads, sewers, water lines, schools, parks, etc. We are not opposed to growth and in fact, the development of the Glendobbin Road area was successful in that it partly preserved the integrity of the land and recognized quality of life by not overdeveloping the area. We think Frederick County could continue this planned growth community by also putting conditions to make preparations for a jogging/bike path which would allow all citizens to enjoy our natural resources in a safe and cost efficient manner. We ask that you put in consideration to ask landowners and developers to give consideration in preserving and maintaining the quality of life issues in this area. We would like to see a master plan in Frederick County for planned growth to include recognition of quality of life by including and insuring equal plans for green areas such as parks, bike paths, sidewalks in proportion to new housing growth. For long term growth and good public management, we believe setting standards and recognition of quality of life issues will be a good standard to ensure a community we will all be proud of for future years to come. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to give input into this process. We believe there is a great opportunity here to provide leadership and set a standard in which we can all be proud of, in leaving a legacy of wise public management and planned growth that will allow our community to thrive. We look forward to the process and the final outcome of your decision. Sincerely, C��V- Chad & Kathy Dansie 591 Apple Pie Ridge Road Winchester, Virginia 22603 f Susan Eddy From: Larry Knox [Iclassicgv@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 5:47 PM To: seddy@co.frederick.va.us; cdehaven@crosslink.net; garydove@visuallink.com; supervisorewing@yahoo.com; gfisher@visuallink.com; plemieux@visuallink.com; rshickle@shentel.net', bosvanosten@aol.com Subject: Opposition to Rezoning Glendobbin Road April 5, 2006 >To the Board of Supervisors, >As a current resident, tax payer, and voter of Frederick county I wish >to >express my opposition of the proposed rezoning of Glendobbin Road to >support 60 additional homes. The following issues come immediately to mind >to support this opposition: >Glendobbin Road, Applepie Ridge Road, Payne Road, and Welltown Pike are >already congested with residential and business traffic exiting the >surrounding area. >The road system in the area will not support the additional traffic. The traffic conditions at Welltown / RT 11, >Applepie Ridge Road / Hwy 522 and Hwy 522 / RT 37 are already >problematic. >Additional traffic volume in these areas will do nothing but add to the >current congestion, traffic problems, and dangers facing the community now. >The existing roads (Glendobbin Road and Payne Road) in the area were >not >designed or constructed to accommodate the volume of traffic that will be >added by such a development and they are not in any condition to sustain >any further abuse. We all know that Frederick County will be responsible >for the road up grades necessary to support the additional housing and we >all know who will pay for the road upgrades necessary to support such a >development. You and I will support this project with our increased tax >payments. >If the houses are built, what impact will it have on the garbage >disposal >site located by the Virginia Farmers Market (Indian Hollow Rd)? An increase >in garbage disposal will mean an increase in disposal requirement by the >Indian Hollow Road site. Who will pay for this increased tonnage of garbage >being disposed of at this site? You and I! In addition, will the site even >handle the additional tonnage rate? If not, more money (taxes) will go >toward enlarging the site or usage fees may be imposed on you and I. >Water - How will the housing project support the family dwellings with >water? If all the homes are to have there own well systems; what impact >will this have on the aqueduct system currently supporting the needs of you >and I? However, if the county recommends a county water system be installed >guess who pays for installing the system; You and I support this project >with our increased tax payments. >What effect will this have on the environment? Think of the apple farms >just below and surrounding the housing development. The run off from the >lawn fertilizers will have an impact on the orchards and thus affect the >local farmer. >How about the reverse effect. What affect will the farmers have on the >families? To protect their crops and ensure they produce a marketable fruit 1 >the farmers have to treat their crops by spraying pesticides. Who will J>complain about the environmental impact then? The new residences of the >proposed development. Will this be healthy? No. In addition, it will also >affect the current residents of Gelndobbin Road. The additional fertilizers >and soil contamination will enter the aqueduct and have a direct impact on >our families drinking water. Will this be healthy? No. >What about the impact to the ecosystem in the area. We have fox, deer, >rabbits, hawks, ground hogs, and many other animals that will be displaced >by this development. Where will they go and how will it affect you and I? >You and I will have more animals in and around our homes looking for food >and shelter. In addition, there will be a loss of native plant life, and >soil contamination with such a development. These issues will allow for >more disease and danger for your family and mine. Will this be healthy? No. >What will this do for our property value? If they build homes of lesser >value then our property values will decline. However, our taxes will not >decline. You and I will support this project with our increased tax rates. >In addition to the issues mentioned above, we are faced with many more >issues that need to be considered before this or any other re -zoning >application is brought before the Board of Supervisors. The short term and >long term affects of such a decision need to be weighed carefully. >As elected officials, you have the responsibility to ensure conformance >with Frederick County's Comprehensive Plan and County Code and provide for >the public's health, safety, convenience, comfort, prosperity and general >welfare. It is your responsibility to ensure that adequate and efficient >systems are provided for transportation, water, sewerage, fire protection, >drainage, erosion control, recreation, open space and other public services >and utilities to promote the development of an economically sound and >stable community. Approving this re -zoning application or any application >similar to the one being discussed will be an irresponsible act with no >consideration for the well being of the residences of the community or the >residences of Fredrick County. >I oppose the building of 60, plus, single family (?) structures on 1/2 >acre >lots on Glendobbin Road. I plan to attend the rezoning hearing and I will >bring these issues to the floor in opposition of the development. >Concerned Tax Payer, Voter, and Resident of Frederick County. >Larry Knox >465 Glendobbin Road >Winchester, VA. 22603 >(540) 723-0077 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. GERALD F SMITH MARGARET E SMITH 274 woODSIDE LN WINCHESTER, VA 22603 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current.land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. t;z_'egards, �- Z Zbo-3 Terry 0 Fincham 231 Mcguire Rd Winchester, VA 22603 t !�CF Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Mf J.1.1d �■APP-5-2006 01:19P FROM:KI11BERLY H. SALATA M 540 450 0052 TO:6656395 P.1 ■ %■ ■E Fax Cover Sheet From: Winchester Musculoskeletal Medicine, PLC Kimberly H. Salata, MD 136 Linden Drive, Suite 102 Winchester, VA 22601 Phone 540-450-0050 Fax 540-450-0052 Date: To: Fax Number: Re:✓C�� Total pages including cover: '-�2 APR-5-2006 01:19P FROM:KIMBERLY H. SALATA M 540 450 0052 TO:6656_g5 P.2 To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Regards, --t)T�Am '-sI of N,11 k, `,i.Y i�.. Mvwzhester, vA OA4-46W �(,V1eJyA- — 33U b (i 5 t.axNe, , w�vchester, vA i�fA a e w•r• ,�� JR) l,ae LA+�c.Lkst_ l-vx , wtwchester, vA I�y���R¢�(►��pi�` y02- �(,YQ# l..Z , Wtwchester, VA 1 6 Mc- �^ ` i OOL O— W�wchester, vA 1qe, C � � Q_o.,L� wtwchester, vA 521 Brae burn nriyt wtwchester, VA . wtwchester, VA , wtwchester, vA wtwchester, vA , wtwchester, vA wtwchester, vA , wtwchester, vA wtwchester, vA APR 5 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, W' c ester, inia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Fre4ollick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobb' , elltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Susan Edd From: gbcarlisle@adelphia. net Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 11 A 0 AM To: seddy@co.frederick.va. us Subject: Rezoning Application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin 5 March 2006 Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner The Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, We write to you this morning to formally express our concerns over the proffered rezoning application, #17-05 of Russell-Glendobbin. We have several concerns about this rezoning request. These concerns have been documented in a form letter that you have probably seen many times, and therefore we will spare you from receiving another copy of the entire text. In short, we are concerned that; - the requested land use will not be consistent with the surrounding area, - the Preservation Parcel (the 40% set -aside parcel with 36.54 acres (Parcel 43-A-16)) established in 2002, will not remain "preserved", - in addition to the traffic generated by the new houses, the potential for a through street into the adjoining industrial park could result in a significant increase of traffic on the surrounding road system, - the housing layout is not well defined and raises the question of just how many homes will eventually be built in the rezoned area. Is this just a cloaked, phased approach to the original 130 home plan? If for no other reasons than the traffic increases and the high -density build out, we respectfully urge you to decline request for rezoning. Very Respectfully, The Carlisle Family 808 Apple Pie Ridge Road 1 To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzer� a rds, , Mi cc ester, vA MvLzc fester, VA ` r M% chester, vA a i c1 UC�,S r - , w�v�ci ester, vA Mvxkster, vR Mvuckster, vA Moxkster, vA Mnchester, v.A M% chester, vA Mvuckster, v,A vALckster, vA Mv�.ckester, vA Mv,chester, vA , w%v�,c h este r, vA To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rze9 a ro(s, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Fzega►- s, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Re�aY-L s G�� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 1 Cr'� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.egar- s Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. __5 � C) Ql� �9 _? __ ('_�) Z �) � Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. W f2 _J'Z�5 ""4t/ It4 - MATORM! oAKzhester, VA �wchester, v 1 1 9 / G4pQL1/ Ci , wi-chester, VA wLwchester, vA ko4 i6 ee-e- ( , Mre ester, vA l - c.,wN asp (�Ser� r�„��� ��r�C V/A 721,0 3 C f 4-t:4 V Z Z L. ° , Mvxc ester, VA Mchester, vA 76 w%wchester, v.4 Mohester, vA wtmkster, vA ISI S2�J 2� bra Whwchestev, vA MKtkester, VA Mr,hester, vR as y_(}iQaa o J r ur " , Mi chester, VA To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.eCJ. a rots, -, d f r J`4 ff CC )-,O-/ Z 30 CILt `i iAj 1/1'aJ La-7'l-e—, Mu chester, vA G+ HeIn Z Z U y� 1-1 l ��Q�> , M% oc ester, VA G - Z (�t.y ..e (i,rZt �/ , w% akster, vA 33 Lwchester, vA MAchester, vA 3 � O Vr *� U r � `� M% akester, VA 311yplun• 61'tl� , Makester, vR 3%J a k�ti 1/ % (_IO � �` `-' , wi.wchester, vA u V A\ UA �' Q w 2 a n f , ML kster, vA Mmc ester, vA Mokester, vA M% chester, VA y�o CL-,!PVJbot315/,J '?-Z— w�wchester, vR 46 s 6 ( wVL_ Rd . , mnchester, vR oz a6 0 3 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Regards' Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. tzeg a rc{s, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. J Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzeq a rots, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec�ar CoS, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R_eq a rds, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. tzegaro(s, )-7' % ar--- Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rze9 a Y-c S, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. tzzgavds, YCt�Yy `� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rz.ec� a ids, � 00( Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.e0arc s, W/1vc14 i� sT R V4, 2 0 03 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 2egards, ���03 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec� a rds, 167 2 2 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rz.e� a rc{s, L �� �' Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec� a rots, /JeVNI'S S. �OAt'lV-Sa1v s< Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzegards, YSS pcxync Q� l,,.J mcheSA� V n 2Z(ov j Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. q � /� ,,/ e— �� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. ��cc�fci-�Y-rn � �210 O 3 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzeg 2 Y I!JC hecJe 6 n_3 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rz.eg a rds, 3/0 z�G3 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec� a �-ds, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. TZZG� a Yo(s, �`- Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. a2rO(s, v�- Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. fit, gkk Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. ., � w ; it a te,, 1 �u oav_ a �� -' o_b le . Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rz.e 9 aZyo3 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzega ro(s, Jjtl�' Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. tzer� a rLd s, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. i r ' Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.e�J a ►�ols, Mv-chester, VA Ve o 4 Yl l M , WI rViiester, vA MvLchester, VA Mv�_hester, vA Mv,chester, vR M% chester, VA MoxL ester, vA w Kzkester, v.A MC chester, vA vAvxVester, vA Mvzkester, vA Mckester, vA Mvuchester, VA Mvzc ,ester, vA To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. R.e e) a rot s, 16 �2 z (_ o 3 M.chester, vA c)A� 3 , Moe fester, vA O 226r03 2 A7 V'-"111AfeCTJ /UrAl !c _;W vlki: , Mwchester, vA C�/U v H o�A �J �U �r7Q �G� Cv V1 PJ- Z Z ��w Chester, vA ii Q 0ke, 64-?�6 Chester, vA MvLzkester, vA O�IQ('p ,a Z�- 6-f 3 , w�mhester, vA AY 4/-r Ad �7-;2/, Z) 3 , Mm kster, vA Z5 -C cd• 2Z (ob , Mwo, ester,v.A %"V(- e �,'-3 , Mv�chester, vA Mvxc ester, vA Mchester, vA M4chester, vA To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Mvxc ester, vA y L '1 / b b h , •� , Mi ce ester, VFW C�(( 04)1 Lk. , w�vtichester, va Mv�,c'r,ester, vA MAchester, vR w;wc'r,ester, vA �4 -v\ -2—, wLwchester, VA Mv�.6iester, v.4 Of U" t�-� J �.�i✓r. .0 tiy� , WCw3nester, vA 1 —1 U ��� c La {%1 e vA�chester, vA 14 f�w�'t &" e , Mvxc ester, v.A �� Qu to-af- , M% chestev, VA wCv�.cnester, vR Zzr lip ��<,! ��� , Mvvclnester, vA To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. 1RPrAnvr)c- w%wchester, vA w%wchester, vA �U-G,� -� C_ ��•lJt.l� l �' �✓ ��-� Cti �� Mv Chester, vR M% chester, vac LQucorx Love_ , Mwchester, VA o, wLvLchestev, v,4 l•J v4nchester, vA Mmkester, vR w%mkster, VA a/ , Mi chester, vA wi,wchester, VA MozL fester, vA Mvxc ester, VA Mwchester, vA To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Req a rds, M% 61ester, vA Mnac ester, vA Mnokester, vA M% chester, vA WLwchester, vA wi.wchester, vA Mr,hester, vA Mi chester, vA Mwchester, vA M% chester, vA M% ahester, vA Wewchester, vA Mwchester, vA Makester, vA To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Rer)arLc S, Mvohester,vA f ,G �fi�t� ] t I.� . la l .. Pin nJCc+� •.�/ �� wun,chester, VA iAAW . Qq ON -SHOO ��.O�A ��� 11� �L , wi.wchester, VA vvLwchester, vA Mvtthester, vA Mvxc ester, vA Mvwchester, vA Mvzkster, vA W%vi,chester, vA wLv,.chester, vA Mvwchester, vA Mv�chester, vA Mmkester, vA Mv�,chester, vA To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Re arL(s, �Aa jlvl�rh�s � VA 2 2 66 3 /s- /� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 11. Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzer� a rds, �, Mvxc ester, VA w%v�.chester, vA Wl,vt.chester, vA ML chester, vA Mv�chester, vA VAnchester, vA Mvxc ester, vA Mnchester, vA Moxc ester, vA ML chester, vA Mvi.chester, vA Mv%thester, vA Mv�.chester, vA Iry ov hester, vA MSN Hotmail - Page I of I MSl1) ® Hotmail® clknox66COhotmail.com Printed: Saturday, April 1, 2006 3:13 PM From : Cara Knox <clknox664hotmail.com> Sent : Tuesday, February 7, 2006 6:10 PM To: rshickle@shentel.net, bosvanosten@aol.com, garydove@visuallink.com, supervisorewing@yahoo.com, gfisher@visuallink.com, cdehaven@crosslink.net, plemieux@visuallink.com Subject: Rezoning on Glendobbin Rd. I would like to express my opposition to Pamela L. Russell and Glen W. Russell's request to rezone a 67.73 acre parcel of property, put in a high density community and build 130 new houses on 1/3 acre lots on Glendobbin Rd. That would affect so many things in this beautiful area, and not in a good way.That many homes would just not make sense here and would cause slot of problems. Please keep the zoning as it is. Thank you for your time. Cara Knox �;/ http://by ] 03fd.bay] 03.hotmaii.msn.com/cgi-bin/getmsg9curmbox=00000000%2d0000%2d0000%2d0000... 4/1/2006 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rz.e�J � ids, PCs 6 re_�Yo 6 b.� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 -5-?7--L- 0 6 Frederick County Board of Supervisors I am sending this letter to register my feelings against the rezoning of the land near Welltown and Glendobbin roads. The increased density of housing this would allow would negatively impact traffic at an overworked intersection, place a drain on the local education by increasing the student population beyond capacity, and decrease the quality of life of established residents with the exponent- ional increase in local population. We are already feeling the impact from the fast growth of the last 4 years. Our county growth should slow down to allow infrastructure to catch up NOT go faster. As our county board members, you need to do what is best for the county as a whole --not just the land developers! Sincerely, John and Darla Barrett 307 Cottonwood Dr Winchester VA 22603 To: The Frederick County Planning Commission and The Frederick County Board of Supervisors, 107 N. Kent St., Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Commissioners and Supervisors, We are residents of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. We object to the Russel l-Glendobbin rezoning request for several reasons. It is not consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. The proposed plan may double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. This will add a lot more traffic as well as many more students to a school system that is full already. Finally, it would put a high -density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. ReP a roll, Mchester, vA Mvxkiester, vA Mw re ester, vA Mi ,Nester, VA Mvxkester, vA -cp\/A Mvxc ester, vA r U(-)k , Vi�- , Mchester, vA I Cr �- CUSP I f'L�—S C4 ` `�' , MAcViester, vA Mo-akester, vA _ v t j q(( "Jer0 Mvxo ester, v,Q Mi chester, vA c 'Mv�t k ester, VA JC�<<; h✓(�,y Mvchester, vA � � r ^ ( , Mvwthester, VA To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rzec� a �-ds, J V C �JI-cam s"Je ✓ , I a ��(43 Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. rze� a col s, Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. izegar� ft))J koAd C'-14cccPS4r 1�r� to , nc{�S�r VA aa�Q� Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 To: Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Ms. Eddy, I am a resident of Frederick County and live in the area around Apple Pie Ridge, Glendobbin, Welltown and Payne Roads. I object to the Russell-Glendobbin rezoning request because • It is NOT consistent with the current land usage and the existing neighborhoods already in this area. • Part of the request is to develop a recently set -aside preservation parcel. This would violate the purpose of a preservation parcel by developing it rather than preserving it. • Depending on what could get built, it will double or even triple the number of homes already built in the area. • It will significantly increase traffic in the area and will add many more students to a school system that is full already. • It would put a high density subdivision in close proximity to an existing industrial park and to orchards as well as to the proposed future Rt. 37 bypass. Frederick Co. Planning Dept. Attn: Susan Eddy 107 N. Kent St., 2nd Floor, Winchester, Virginia 22601