Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
012-05 Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan for The Villages at Artrip - Backfile
Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Masten Development Plan for The Tillages at Artrrip Tax Map 75-A, Parcel 99A Frederick County, Virginia June 17, 2005 Prepared by: Winchester Artrip Limited Liability Company c/o The Tower Companies 11501 Huff Court North Bethesda, MD 20895 301.984.7000 301.984.7601 fax Attn: Charles Segerman, P.E. csegerman(o)towercompan ies.com Dewberry 611 West Jubal Early Drive Building B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 540.678.2700 540.678.2703 fax Attn: David L. Frank, CLA dfran I((cDdewberry.com Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich, & Terpak, PC 4310 Prince William Parkway Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 703.680.4664 703.680.2161 Attn: John H. Foote, Esq. ifoote(cDpw.th e land lawyers. com _0, Dewberry ., 82 E • Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan for The Villages at Artrip Tax Map 75-A, Parcel 99A Frederick County, Virginia June 17, 2005 Prepared by: Winchester Artrip Limited Liability Company c/o The Tower Companies 11501 Huff Court North Bethesda, MD 20895 301.984.7000 •301.984.7601 fax Attn: Charles Segerman, P.E. csegerman @towercompanies.Com Dewberry 611 West Jubal Early Drive Building B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 540.678.2700 540.678.2703 fax Attn: David L. Frank, CLA dfrank@dewberry.com Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich, & Terpak, PC 4310 Prince William Parkway Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 703.680.4664 703.680.2161 fax Attn: John H. Foote, Esq. jfoote @ pw.thelandlawyers.com 0 The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • REZONING APPLICATION, IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT AND MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE VILLAGES AT ARTRIP L' • The Villages at Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • Table of Contents 1. Rezoning and Master Development Plan Applications 2. Executive Summary 3. Impact Analysis Statement 4. Frederick County Fiscal Impact Model 5. Proffer Statement 6. Agency Comments 7. Property Tax Receipt 8. Appendices: A. Property Deed B. Wetland Delineation Report • C. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment D. Historic Sites and Structures Report E. Comprehensive Sign Package Pockets: Master Development Plan, Sheet 1 of 4 Master Development Plan, Sheet 2 of 4 Master Development Plan, Sheet 3 of 4 Master Development Plan, Sheet 4 of 4 Core Area Concept Plan Conceptual Building • The Villages al Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan 0 List of Exhibits Exhibit Number/Name 1. Vicinity Map 2. Aerial Photograph 3. Boundary Verification 4. Topographic Survey 5. Current Zoning Map 6. 2003 Comprehensive Policy Plan, South Frederick Land Use Plan Excerpt 7. Urban Development Area/Sewer & Water service Area 8. Illustrative Plan -Housing types- Conceptual Building Elevations 9. Surrounding Projects • 10. Major Road Systems 11. Major Road Systems (Enlarged) 12. FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map 13. Floodplain Delineation for An Unnamed Tributary to Opequon Creek 14. Wetlands and Waters of the U.S. 15. Steep Slopes 16. Mature Woodlands 0 The Villages atANfip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • List of Exhibits - continued Exhibit Number/Name 17. County Soils Survey Excerpt 18. Geology Map 19. Surrounding Properties 20. Existing Sewer Systems 21. Proposed Sewer Systems 22. Existing Water Systems 23. Proposed Water Systems 24. Existing Major Drainage Divides 25. Proposed Stormwater ManagementBMP Facilities • 26. Historical Resources Sites 27. Field -surveyed Historical Resources Sites 28. School Districts 29. Police Service Facilities Locations 30. Fire & Rescue Service Facilities Locations 31. Parks & Recreation Facilities Locations 32. Solid Waste Disposal Locations The Villages atAHfip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • List of Tables Table Number/Name 1. Environmental Features 2. Adjacent Property Owners (with current uses and zoning classification) 3. Proposed Water Demand/Sewage Flow Generation 4. Parkins Mill Wastewater Treatment Plant Operational Data 5. Proposed Solid Waste Generation 6. Proposed Residential Students Generation • • The Villages (it Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • SECTION 1 REZONING & MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATIONS • • Dewberry 0 2 The Villages at Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • SECTION 2 IMPACT ASSESSMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • • oll Dewberry 3 The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • SECTION 3 IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT • • � 0 Dewberry I*, 4 The Villages at Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • SECTION 4 FREDERICK COUNTY FISCAL IMPACT MODEL • 0 :=4 Dewberry a�� The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan SECTION 5 PROFFER STATEMENT • � 0 41.11 Dewberry I S �M The Villages at Arlrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan .I L SECTION 6 AGENCY COMMENTS • 0 • REZONING APPLICATION AGENCY REVIEW COMMENTS E-1 0 • June 22, 2005 Mr. David L. Frank, CLA Dewberry & Davis LLC 611 West Juba] Early Drive, Suite C Winchester, Virginia 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/678-0682 RE: The Villages at Artrip - Comments related to Rezoning Application and Master Development Plan Frederick County, Virginia Dear Mr. Frank: Your letter dated June 13, 2005, has adequately addressed our previous review comments related to the rezoning application and master development plan associated with the proposed Villages at Artrip. Sincerely, J Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: Planning and Development File 107 North bent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 • i • Rezoning Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 868-1061 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia AppXicn+ lease fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the S; ifation Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your, application form, location 1[Ytai?'ofer statement, impact analysis, and any other perent information. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: David L. Frank dii rresL JUDa1 Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)) Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage: 169.924 I Sanitation Authority Comments: Sanitation Authority Signature & Date: 25 .. S c/0L D 5- Rezoning Comments ,;G �,..EcCcia. +.� � ✓ ±i):•:;;•X;S V:ri::4i:hvi ii:•i: .w ii'.'+':�:v ii::a': iL 0 Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (540) 868-1061 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer 315 Tasker Road Stephens City, Virginia Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 • Location of property: South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage: 169.924 Sanitation Authority Comments: I /V '' �t> // /�'&/1// Sanitation Authority Signature & Date: _ / ���ynJ/r )y ah; ta. S �nxfi f z� uthvxa€ty ... 't as eturr ►T to t�► the Applican# D e w b le r r y • --- _A-2- 611 We7UEarly Dr. Bldg B Suite C. Winchester, VA 2601--___ ° r 1 i Y Transmittal MAY�rwµ''' Phone 540.678.2700 Fax 34a'6t7H'703' ° ` n Atlanta, GA IN Fairfax, VA Gaithersburg, MD F-311Chicago, IL IN Baltimore, MD E� Fredericksburg, VA J Lanham, MD To: :Frederick County Sanitation Authority P.O. Box 1877 Winchester VA 22604 ttention:IJohn Whitacre Manassas, VA 0 Leesburg, VA i] Winchester, VA .Date: 15/6/2005 Project No:11276014 Project Name: Villiages at Artrip Reference: ;Carbon Copy-.1 We Transmit: the following: for: as per your request 0 prints ® your approval 0 under separate cover specifications your review and comment ® by mail ® change order ® your fiileluse J by messenger ® shop drawings FRI revision and submission Q by pick up -5 reproducibles ❑A distribution Q by overnight ® samples na carrier product literature ® computations n descriptions nz Ea: as requested by Q as approved by na as submitted for approval by ® please acknowledge receipt of enclosures ® return enclosures to us Coses: Date: Number: Description: 1 5/6/2005 Master Development Plan 1 5/6/2005 Proffers Statement 1 5/6/2005 Comment Response Letter t nmmantc- If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at price Transmittal # 4509 or-171 & Davis LLC is an equal opportunity employer and. as such. complies with Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order 11357. 4 Rezoning Comments xQ. , l(II 9 32004 ....�___ _.._._ _ LANNIN01 X OF F-IAMMENT Historic Resources Advisory hoard Mail to: Frederick County. Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5651 Hand deliver to.• Frederick County Department of Planning & Development Co. Administration Building, 4th Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip Limited Telephone: (301) 984-7nnn Partners hip Mailmg Address: e/n The Tnwor rnm Ii t1Tj pq 11501 Fluff - Court North Bethesda,* MD 20895 Location of ro _ Sduth Frederick Land. Use Plan area, ' east of I. , West of U.S. 522 bn Tax Map 75 ((A) )_, Parcel 99A Current zoning: RA II Advisory Board Comments: Signature & Date: Zoning requested:. R4 Acreage: 169.924 COUNTY of FREDERIC I Department of Planning and Developmei I August 5, 2004 Mr. Mike Wiley Dewberry & Davis LLC 611 West Jubal Early Drive Winchester, -VA 22601 RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments Villages at Artrip; Rezoning Proposal; PIN# 75-A-99A Dear Mr. Wiley: 540/665-56! I FAX: 540/ 665-63! R�C�IV C AUG .9 2004 Dewberry_Wir�hester Upon review of the proposed rezoning, it appears that the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the rezoning application by the HRAB. The Rural Landmarks Survey and the Comprehensive Policy Plan do not identify -any significant historic structures or battlefields located on or adjacent to the property. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Candice E. Mills Planner I CEM/bad I• 107 North Kent Street m Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY Philip A. Shucet 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER EDINBURG, VA 22824 May 20, 2005 Mr. Michael T. Wiley C/O Dewberry 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Building B, Suite 6 Winchester, VA 22601 Ref: Winchester Artrip, LLC Dear Mr. Wiley: I MAY 2 3 2005 i JERRY A. COPP RESIDENT ENGINEER TEL (540) 984-5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have significant measurable impact on Route 719. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the transportation proffers offered in The Villages at Artrip rezoning application dated May 20, 2005 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. The developer will be required to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT at the time the roadway is requested to be accepted into the State's Secondary Svstem. The developer will be liable fur the cost of the signal. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Lloyd A. Ingram, Transportation Engineer LAI/rf Enclosure — Comment Sheet VirginiaDOT.org WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING . Virginia Department of Transportation • • Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (540) 984-5600 Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer 2275 Northwestern Pike Winchester, Virginia 22603 Telephone: 540 — 678 — 270 0 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Location of roe PrtY South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)), property: Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage: 169.924 Virginia Department of Transportation Comments: See attached letter from VDOT to Mr. Michael Wiley dated May 20, 2005. VDOT Signature & Date: Notice to VDOT - Please Return Form to Applicant 20 MAY 2 v 2005 J • • Rezoning Comments Frederick County Fire Marshal Mail to: Frederick County Fire Marshal 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-6350 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept. Attn: Fire Marshal County Administration Bldg., 1 st Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)) Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage: 169.924 Fire Marshal's Comments: Fire Marshal's Signature & Date: 1`o p F 'e a s a`�:=''lease R' �rrt is Form to the App&Aht 22 q 41— - G • w x p: H VIRGINIA Control number RZ04-0021R Project Name Winchester Artrip LLC Address 611 West Jubal Early Drive Type Application Rezoning Current Zoning RA Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation I• Emergency Vehicle Access Siamese Location Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Date received Date reviewed Date Revised 5/6/2005 5/17/2005 5/1 /2005 Applicant Dewberry City State Zip Applicant Phone Winchester VA 22601 540-678-2700 Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District 75-A-99A 11 11 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Hydrant Location Roadway/Aisleway Width Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System No Fire Lane Required No Special Hazards No •Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature s�i• Yes Timothy L. Welsh Title��r t�aL��,ry �S RICIVr1: J Rezoning Comments iv�;5 • )Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Frederick County i Department of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5678 Hand deliver to: Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 . Location of property. South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)) Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176) Current zoning: RA Zoning requested R4 Acreage: 169.924 Department of Parks & Recreation Comments: SEE ATTACHED Pks. & Rec. Signature & Date: -1�'ii 'M V k ,MRQI ��'Y�Jt ! .�� I h} St tYivrtwZ(rY7 xI KAl aYi ,.o �,e,, �,o, I�epar�i�nenfi�o�Par��s �4� ]Recreation Phase` I�eturnw�'�'h�`E`ortl� tq�th�t�pplacan T E_ DEC 0 8 2004 Dewberry-Wii ,ches'ter REZONING COMMENTS ARTRIP Department of Parks and Recreation's Comments: • The area identified as a school site and open space for use by the Parks and Recreation Department does not appear to be adequate to accommodate both uses. • The typical section on page three of five of the Master Development Plan, indicates trails to be between five and ten feet in width. The Parks and Recreation Department recornmends all trail to be a minimum of ten feet in width. The revised proffer statement has modified proffer 5.1 to reflect ten foot bike trails. • The Proffer Statement should include language which indicates the bridge design (the proffer statement, section 14.2.1.1) will accommodate bicycle lanes. • The proposed monetary proffer for Parks and Recreation appears to be less than what the impact model would indicate is needed to offset the impact of this development. Signature and Date: (',^ i / � ��� j—// d/-le 22 --- • 0 Ll Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Winchester Artrip LLC c/o Dewberry Attention: David Franks 611 West Jubal Early Drive Building B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 \\���tje0t3 /14.�jpe �c 4, F c P o vcj n r Frederick County Public Schools Visit us at www.frederick.M.va.us June14, 2005 Dear Mr. Franks: RE: Resubmitting of rezoning application for The Villages at Artrip Project e-mail: kapocsis@frederick.k12.va.us This letter is in response to your request for comments concerning the rezoning application for the proposed Villages at Artrip project. Based on the information provided, it is anticipated that the proposed 155 single-family homes, 180 town houses, and 570 multi -family homes will yield 49 high school students, 47 middle school students, and 131 elementary school students for a total of 227 new students upon build -out. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools serving this area having student enrollments nearing or exceeding the practical capacity for a school. The cumulative impact of this project and others of similar nature, coupled with the number of approved, undeveloped residential lots in the area, will necessitate the future construction of new school facilities to accommodate increased student enrollments. The resubmitting of this rezoning application with its proffer statement provides approximately 11 acres to be dedicated for a fature elementary school site (minimum acreage needed for an elementary site would be 15 acres). It is imperative with the above number of units included with this project that an elementary school be located in this area. With current building trends, future considerations need to given to additional middle and high school facilities. Also because of the continued growth in Frederick County, the replacement of certain administrative facilities such as the transportation and administration, which currently have exceeded their capacity, will need to be replaced or expanded. This proffer helps to address the impact of a fat>re elementary school; however, the impact of this type of application on other current and future school division needs should be considered during the approval process. Respectfully yours, Stephen Kapocsi Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent SMK/dkr cc: William C. Dean, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools 540-662-3889 Ext 112 1415 Amherst Street, Post Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604-2546 FAX 540-662-3890 • ncoq,ny1n_ 7l JA Rezoning Comments 7 ` h4, 7 5 A — q9A Frederick -Winchester Health Department Mail to: Frederick -Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722-3480 Hand deliver to: Frederick -Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: South Frederick Land' Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176) Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage:169.924 Fred er'ck-WinchesterrRealth Department's Comments: Lt,lr! C�!� c-.r��,-C� ( �� �5f'�-�'� e4 e ixr Z car < Health Dept. Signature & Date: ` 1�T�itor�,epa�m�en��Peas`e4eurgi�sTor`10the'APp)I_cjn tZ f DEC 0 1 2004 Dewberry-Wlric Rezoning Comments Ti4aWrinl"^,PP 61 CS"'I� L iKti AC?tl�y; �; t� G��4Pg3 v Y lRTY Y,4mS ir�]I�TAi:.�..�kwww.a 'W..v. • 'Town of Middletown Mail to: Town of Middletown Attn: Town Manager P.O. Box 96 Middletown, Virginia 22645 (540) 869-2226 Hand deliver to: Town of Middletown Attn: Town Manger Middletown Town Hall 7875 Church Street Middletown, Virginia Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive Bldg B, Suite C Winchester VA 22601 • Location of property: Parcel 99A. One South Frederick Land Use area Tax Map 75—((A)) mile west of I-81 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176) Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage: 169.924 Town of Middletown's Comments: J Town of Middletown's Signature & Date:';/-. o„xc�e tquT'ovvn, of M�ddlef+m�► n'# Pease,Retuxn This bran to the Applicant ,._. DEC 0 8 VO4 Dewberry -Winchester . 775 27 Comments 0 Town of Stephens City :7 0 Mail to: Town of Stephens City Attn: Town Manager P.O. Box 250 Stephens City, Virginia 22655 (540) 869-3087 Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Hand deliver to: Town of Stephens City Attn: Town Manager Stephens City Town Hall 1033 Locust Street Stephens City, Virginia Telephone: 540— 678 —2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75-((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176) Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 . Acreage: 169.924 Town of Stephen City's Comments: _! J'I �i Town of Stephens City's y Signature & Date: ✓%r, , p -c �/; f! 5 rex:��•s+wsM1 '"k'Ft7y h� iN'U �, �•rtt raX F�V `:in7b t�l i� � Al�'4 ) '�� f te„ � 1 a:_ n `. �Voitiic� he 9.1 i• • Rezoning Comments b'si -bt,;•r 9aa ',1t.:']" C:n 'f'.rbri �3:.::�]G,°i`, A+.sii9>X •���Yi -�Kf :ti .'•pY Y s f . _;5:• :4 •vF City of Winchester Mail to: Winchester City Planning Department Attn: Planning Director 15 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667-1815 Hand deliver to: Winchester City Planning Department Attn: Planning Director Rouss City Hall 15 North Cameron Street Winchester, Virginia Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Telephone: 540-678-2700 Mailing Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Location of property: South Frederick Land Use area, Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649), and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: R4 Acreage: 169.924 City of Winchester's Comments: 1, kv-1 /PC In 1A, 1� 4q�, Of 0 V11 J0 b,1,9 L-, 5 ov �4 et City of Winchester's Signature & Date: ,Wiidcheter „ e' Return;'�'his g+ orm to the'Applicant 0 29 ffl F7 L_J .,�Jk SERVING THE TOP OF VIRGINIA / May 20,2005 WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 David L. Frank, CLA Project Manager Dewberry 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Building B, Suite C Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning Application & Master Plan Development Plan Comments The Villages at Artrip Shawnee Magisterial District Dear Mr. Frank: We have reviewed the above referenced Rezoning Application/Master Plan and it appears that the proposed site plan will not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the majority of the subdivision falls outside of the Airport's Part 77 surface. No special requirements or conditions are requested on behalf of the Winchester Regional Airport Authority. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Serena R. Manuel Executive Director • Record of Communication ;WDewberry ivYlt; t1ic1K1r RE/5V1V11V1i YAUKE1 Greg said he would not sign off on the comments because no amount of funds for the Volunteer fire dept. was designated as a contribution. According to Greg: The VFD are volunteers and receive no compensation for their fire fighting, but they buy the equipment (engines, ambulances, etc) and house and maintain them while the Fire and Rescue get all the funds. The VFD have had no funds for 3 years while the F&R have had 3 raises and get the money in the proffers. They will have to refuse to cover the Artrip area, because without any funds they won't have the equipment needed to do so. They want an amount designated at a contribution for the VFD stated in the proffers. I spoke to Mike about this situation the next day and he said they could state their objections and what they want as their comments. I have called Greg on his pager and left a message. So far I have received no answer. updated 1/03 Dewberry Transmittal ..« fill West Jubal Early Dr. Bldg B, Suite C. Winchester, Va 22601 I _J Phone 540.676.2700 FAx 540,678,2703 ❑ Atlanta, GA ❑ Fairfax, VA ❑ Gaithersburg, MD ❑ Manassas, VA ❑ Chicago, IL ❑ Leesburg, MD ❑ Baltimore, MD f,] Fredericksburg, VA ❑ Lanham, MD XJ Winchester, VA ITO: Fred —Wine Service Authority Date: 08 NOV 04 Project No: 76030007 107 North Kent Street Project Name: The Villages at Artrip Winchester VA 22601 Reference: Carbon Copy: Charles A. Segerman, P.E. Attention: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director John H. Foote, Esq. We Transmit: the following_ for: ❑ as per your request prints ❑ p ❑ your approval ❑ as requested ❑ under separate cover ❑ specifications by MI your review and comment `J by mail change orders ❑ g ❑ your file/use as approved b y ® by messenger ❑ shop drawings ❑ revisions and submission ❑ as submitted for ❑ by pick up re roducibles ❑ p ❑ distribution approval by ❑ please acknowledge receipt ❑ by overnight carrier ❑ samples ❑ of enclosures ❑ product literature ❑ return enclosures to us ❑ ❑ computations ❑ descriptions Copies: Date: Number: Description: 1 76030007 Rezoning Application, Impact Annalysis Statement and Master Development Plan for The Villages at Artrip, Comments: - t►esub $& He) l�e4Rm re f rarLoucs Ibl�lls �s M►te�ssary 4b accerr mod v nsi set bum.,^, " -01osures are not as noted, please notify us at once. Michael Sent by.. 1 T. Wiley Dewberry & Davis LLC is an equal opportunity employer and, as such, complies with Section of Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order 11357. dOn T T � --) I nir+ . . . 1.— , . —. . .. -, . - - --.. 0, MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGENCY REVIEW COMMENTS • IC- 0 0 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Develolpment Plan Comments Virginia Department of Transportation Mail to: Virginia Department of Transportation Atha: Resident Engineer 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, Virginia 22824 (540) 984-5600 Hand deliver to: Virginia Department of Transportation 2275 Northwestern Pike Winchester, VA 22603 (540) 535-1818 R E (—./' E I'V E [MAY 2 5 2005 Dewberry -Winchester Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia Department of Transportation with their review. Please attach three (3) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone Number. 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649 and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Vix ir�ia Degar rent of Trawortation' Commentls: The pre urinary a er plan or is propery appears 719, the VD ble to VDOI Rafnra making any final rnmmants, this office will require a comblete set of site plans drainaqe calculations and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signs iza ion, and off-sim road y imp td - - tI- 1is office-feF essuaRceef aPflrepriate perrAits tQ sever said work Page 20 Frederick County Fire and Rescue Department Office of the Fire Marshal Plan Review and Comments Control number Date received MDP04-0021 R 5/6/2005 Project Name Winchester Artrip LLC Address City 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Winchester Type Application Tax ID Number Master Development 75-A-99A Current Zoning RA Automatic Sprinkler System No Other recommendation • Emergency Vehicle Access Not Identified Siamese Location Not Identified Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Date reviewed 5/17/2005 Applicant Dewberry State Zip VA 22601 Fire District 11 Recommendations Automatic Fire Alarm System No Requirements Hydrant Location Not Identified Roadway/Aisleway Width Not Identified Date Revised 5/ 1 /2005 Applicant Phone 540-678-2700 Rescue District 11 Election District Shawnee Residential Sprinkler System Yes Fire Lane Required Yes Special Hazards No �.--� •Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes Timothy L. Welsh 11 Title Frederick County,Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package • Request for Master Development Plan n Comments Frederick County Department of Parks and'Recreation Mai to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County i 2nd Floor Department of Parks and Recreation 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5678 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone Number: 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlajzes at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)) Parcel 99A One mile w St of I-81, 3 4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176) Department of Parks and Recreation's Comments: SEE ATTACHED Page 28 I MAY 19 2005 PRINTED dewberry- Winchester • • • REQUEST FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS ARTRIP Department of Parks and Recreation's Comments: • The area identified as a school site and open space for use by the Parks and Recreation Department does not appear to be adequate to accommodate both uses. • The typical section on page three of five of the Master Development Plan, indicates trails to be between five and ten feet in width. The Parks and Recreation Department recommends all trail to be a minimum of ten feet in width. The revised proffer statement has modified proffer 5.1 to reflect ten foot bike trails. • The Proffer Statement should include language which indicates the bridge design (the proffer statement, section 14.2.1.1) will accommodate bicycle lanes. • The proposed monetary proffer for Parks and Recreation appears to be less than what the impact model would indicate is needed to offset the impact of this development. Signature and Date: N� Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Winchester Artrip LLC c/o Dewberry Attention: David Franks 611 West Jubal Early Drive Building B, Suite C Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Mr. Franks: . F c P n m r a Frederick County Public Schools Visit us at www.frederick.k12.va.us June 14, 2005 e-mail: kapocsis@frederick.k12.va.us RE: Resubmitting of rezoning application for The Villages at Artrip Project This letter is in response to your request for comments concerning the rezoning application for the proposed Villages at Artrip project. Based on the information provided, it is anticipated.that the proposed 155 single-family homes, 180 town houses, and 570 multifamily homes will yield 49 high school students, 47 middle school students, and 131 elementary school students for a total of 227 new students upon build -out. Significant residential growth in Frederick County has resulted in the schools serving this area having student enrollments nearing or exceeding the practical capacity for a school. The cumulative impact of this project and others of similar nature, coupled with the number of approved, undeveloped residential lots in the area, will necessitate the future construction of new school facilities to accommodate increased student enrollments. The resubmitting of this rezoning application with its proffer statement provides approximately 1 I acres to be dedicated for a future elementary school site (minimum acreage needed for an elementary site would be 15 acres). It is imperative with the above number of units included with this project that an elementary school be located in this area. With current building trends, future considerations need to given to additional middle and high school facilities. Also because of the continued growth in Frederick County, the replacement of certain administrative facilities such as the transportation and administration, which currently have exceeded their capacity, will need to be replaced or expanded. This proffer helps to address the impact of a future elementary school; however, the impact of this type of application on other current and future school division needs should be considered during the approval process. Respectfully yours, C91, Stephen Kapocsi�� Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent SMK/dkr cc: William C. Dean, Ph.D., Superintendent of Schools 540-662-3889 Ext 112 1415 Amherst- Street, Post- Office Box 3508, Winchester, VA 22604-2546 FAX 540-662-3890 • • 0 Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County -Winchester Health Department Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick -Winchester Health Department 2nd Floor, Suite 200 Atlas: Sanitation Engineer 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street, Suite 200 Winchester, Virginia Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722-3480 Please fill out the infonnation as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review Please attach one (1) copy of the NMP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone Number: 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court VA Route 1176 . Frederick County-Winchestgr Health Department's Comments Z/ c el A 1�� r—<7 le C cl v _—i Page 29 T .� DEC U 1 2004 • 0 • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Town of Middletown Mail to: I Hand deliver to: Town of Middletown 7875 Church Street Attn: Town Manager Middletown Town Hall P.O. Box 96 Middletown, VA Middletown, Virginia 22645 (540) 869-2226 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone Number: 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Town of Middletown Comments: /UDA44'^ 8 04 Gevvberry-`JVinchester Page 35 9 0 Request Master Development Plan Comments Town of Stephens City Mail to: Town of Stephens City Aft: Town Manager P.O. Box 250 Stephens City, Virginia 22655 Hand deliver to: Town of Stephens City Stephens City Town Hall Stephens City, VA (540) 869-3087 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible to assist the agency with their review. Please attach three copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone number: 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at ArtriD Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Town of Stephens City Comments: �{ (r cyl,f 1 % i ���j�•n�� i GIS'OFFI(, USE ONLY: r & x� �.:, tsate received �t��� 4 Datc tevtsiori,r��czv�d Date Incoirlplete " '. Incomplctt� -approved'' Date review Date reviewed SiRilatuce.and Date. Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package • Request for Master Development Plan Comments City of Winchester Mail to: i Hand deliver to: Winchester Planning Department 15 N. Cameron Street Attn: Planning Director Rouss City Hall 15 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 667-1815 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the NMP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone Number: 540-678-2700 Winchester VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip • Location of property: Tax Map 75— A Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176) City of WinchestTe ' Comments: e Eme "/'S � eu-f <<< ere 551 if - !zS 49 iA i Zrrh%.s C& n-r Z Cifv of_`Vmchester use'only p _� -'r ,; , x _ Date f R '. reMved , h viy}vNulnber 1 2 3 1 5 (please c rcle one} � ; Date xeviewed _ Date approved , =W ;.evtsion requited � Sigxiaturc andbate�T f 32 0 • • SERVING THE TOP OF VIRGINIA / May 20,2005 WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 David L. Frank, CLA Project Manager Dewberry 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Building B, Suite C Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Rezoning. Application & Master Plan Development Plan Comments The Villages at Artrip Shawnee Magisterial District Dear Mr. Frank: We have reviewed the above referenced Rezoning Application/Master Plan and it appears that the proposed site plan will not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport as the majority of the subdivision falls outside of the Airport's Part 77 surface. No special requirements or conditions are requested on behalf of the Winchester Regional Airport Authority. Thank you for your cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Serena R. Manuel Executive Director • • RECEI`�ED 2 ¢- Request Master Development Plan Comments NOV � 2004 Department of GIS (Geographic Information Syste - �ewberry-Winchester Mail to: Hand deliver to: Department of GIS, Attn: GIS Manager Department of GIS 107 North Kent ;Street 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22601 (540) 665-5614 (540) 665-5614 The GIS Department will review the proposed street names for this project to ensure their acceptability into the Frederick County Street Name System. Proposed street names will also be routed through the Communication Center Supervisor for review. This step will nrPve.nt duplicate street names.from being entered. Please attach one copy of the plan indicating proposed names. Applicant's Name: Address: Winchester Artrip LLC c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone number: 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). GIS Dept. Comments: No road names present for comment. Possibility of 21 road names evident. Road names are not to cross major arterial streets such as Warrior Drive or Lakeside. Warrior Drive does not appear to match plans submitted for Wakeland. GIS OFFICE USE ON �r 1�, a DMC rcCly cd �Da.'' e 5 q `�'r ceived r�< �Y Inc,oinplete � � ncomplete D,Mc re ieyvccl ?3 $ D"Itc rcli��yeii Sif_uatureand lMtc: Dafe approved • W W COMMENTS: MAY 1 1 2005 D Pi HIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS -)ewberr,T2AUt1eK COUNTY, VIRGINIA STREET NAME COMMENTS SUBDIVISION COMMENTS DATE: May 10, 2005 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN: Villages at Artirp STAFF MEMBER: Marcus Lemasters, Director 1. Frederick County Code, Chapter 56, Buildings, Numbering of; Roads, Naming of, 56-4: "Any master development plan, subdivision plan, or site plan submitted for review by the Department ofPlanning and Development shall also be submitted to the Department of Geographic Information Systems to review proposed road names and road name requirements." A. The Department of GIS is not required to review Re -zoning Requests or Re -zoning • Proffer Statements. B. Chapter 56 of the County Code does not specifically state that road names are required in a Master Development Plan (MDP), but allows GIS to review a plan if it does present roadways and road names. MDP requirements are set forth by the Department of Planning and Development. If Planning and Development mandates that road names are not required for a MDP, road names will be reviewed during the subdivision process of development. GIS reviews and comments on MDP information as provided. If road names are not presented, they cannot be checked against the Official Road Name List. Therefore no comment can be presented on the road names. The Department of GIS will comment on road layout if it affects or regulates road name suffixes, roadway and name breaks, and numbering. C. The County Code requires structure numbering to be assigned during the subdivision phase. Structure numbering is not complete until an appropriate road name has been assigned. Therefore a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) may not be issued without road naming being complete. 2. Noting comments stated in section 1, the following comments are given concerning the proposed MDP, dated 05/04/05: A. Wa rrior Drive and Lakeside Drive are continuations of existing roadways and names. 0 Villages at Artrip MDP Comments (Cont.) Page 2 B. Parkins Mill Road will not be accepted as a road name, It conflicts with roadways and names already in the system, and is not considered an extension of an existing roadway name C. The potential for up to 21 road names has been noted. D. Any "Private Road" that is the primary entrance for four or more properties must be named before numb ering/addressing can be completed. E. This MDP is presented as a suburban setting and not a rural setting. Therefore, future road name with such suffixes as Road, Lane, Loop, Trail, Bypass, Grade, Highway, Interstate, Overlook, Pike, and Turnpike will not be accepted into the system. F. Acceptable road name suffixes for this development include Alley, Avenue, Boulevard, Circle, Court, Drive, Place, Plaza, Square, Street, Terrace, and Way. 3. The Department of GIS maintains a current Official Street Name List in the department's web page within the Frederick County web site. Future natures maybe checked against this list to avoid • duplication and possible rejection. Chapter 56 of the Frederick County Code contains the regulations and requirements for naming new roadways. This information may also be found in the GIS Department's web pages. Frederick County Planning and Development, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601, (540)665-5614 C, • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Inspections Department Mail to: i Hand deliver to: Frederick County Inspections Department 4th Floor Attn: Building Official 107 N. Kent Street 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 665-5650 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Inspections Department with their review. Please attach one (1) copy of the MDP with this sheet. Applicant's Name: Winchester Artrip LLC Address: c/o Dewberry Attention: David L. Frank 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C Phone Number: 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. One mile west of I-81, 3/4 mile north of Tasker Road (VA Route 649) and 150' north of Fair Lawn Court (VA Route 1176). Frederick County Inspections Department's Comments: Al&' Gn rh m e -a � k o .1, e� Frederick County Inspections Department use only Date received Revie�y Number: ` 2 - " 4 5 (please circle one) Date reviewed Datc approved ' e'S ReyiMon required �I ,nafUr -8ild Date L 1 ti C j idi)e23 1 • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mai to: i Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 315 Tasker Road Attn: Engineer Stephens City, Virginia P.O. Box 1877 (540) 868-1061 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Sanitation Authority with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: Winchester Artrip LLC c/o Dewberry Attention: David L. Frank 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C 540-678-2700 Winchester. VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: I— 81. Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: Page 22 I • • Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package Request for Master Development Plan Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: i Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority 315 Tasker Road Attn: Engineer Stephens City, Virginia P.O. Box 1877 (540) 868-1061 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County Sanitation Authority with their review. Please attach two (2) copies of the MDP with the sheet. Applicant's Name: Address: Phone Number: Winchester Artrip LLC c/o Dewberry Attention: Michael T. Wiley 611 West Jubal Early Drive, Bldg B, Suite C 540-678-2700 Winchester, VA 22601 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Villlages at Artrip Location of property: Tax Map I-81, 3/4 mile and 150' north 75—((A)), Parcel 99A. north of Tasker Road of Fair Lawn Court (' One mile west (VA Route 649 A Route 1176). of Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Comments: 1, sn jxn- areg� VDar dries not a log,,, Water and sewer lines in their right—of—way. 2. You will need to rim a hvdraulic model for the water system A 1 ai er distribution line may be required. Connections to existing water lines from adjacent 3. ,. - may oe required. Page 22 NOV 1 5 2004 i 7 14 f �•i Dewberry Transmittal MAY a2C3 R 611 West Jubal Early Dr. Bldg B Suite C, Winchester, VA 22601 _ Phone 540.678 2700 Atlanta, GA 0 Fairfax, VA Gaithersburg, MD Manassas. VA Chicago, IL Ell Leesburg, VA 0 Baltimore, MD Q Fredericksburg, VA 0 Lanham, MD Winchester, VA To: Frederick County Sanitation Authority P.O. Box 1877 ester VA 22604 ttention: John Whitacre Date: 5/6/2005 !Project No Project Name: Villiages at Artrip Reference: Carbon Copy:j We Transmit: the following: for: ® as per your request ❑d prints 0 your approval ® under separate cover ® specifications ® your review and comment by mail ❑41 change order F31 your file/use 0 by messenger 1 shop drawings -1 revision and submission ® by pick up NO reproducibles ® distribution 7:1] by overnight ® samples —21 • carrier product literature I] ® computations N descriptions a 1276014 ❑A as requested by Fail as approved by 19 as submitted for approval by ® please acknowledge receipt of enclosures ® return enclosures to us Copies: Date: Number: Description: i 1 5/6/2005 Master Development Plan 1 5/6/2005 Proffers Statement i 1 5/6/2005 Comment Response Letter If enclosures are not as noted, please notify us at price & Davis LLC is an equal opportunity employer and, as such, complies with 01-1 n ur Executive Order 11246 as amended by Executive Order 11357. Transmittal # 4509 Sent Y.- - flcrvftt dFrank . c �_ DeWb 1 40 7 The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • SECTION 7 PROPERTY TAX RECEIPT • • • • 11 T A X R E C E I P T - Y E A R 2 0 0 4 Ticket #:00372480001 Date 5/24/2004 Register: JKM/JK Trans. #: 15163 Dept # RE200401 ACCT# 31977 Previous 99A Balance $ 2775.83 169.01 Principal Being Paid $ 2775.83 Land: 760500 Imp: 0 Penalty $ .00 Interest $ .00 WINCHESTER ARTRIP, LLC Amount Paid $ 2775.83 C/O THE TOWER COMPANIES *Balance Due 11501 HUFF CT as of 5/24/2004$ .00 N BETHESDA, MD 20895 1043 Check 2879.86 # BK OF NY Pd by WINCHESTER ARTRIP, LLC ANY BALANCE DUE DOES NOT INCLUDE PENALTY AND INTEREST. (DUPLICATE) FREDERICK COUNTY C. WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR P.O. BOX 225 WINCHESTER VA 22604-0225 2004 REAL ESTATE TAXES 169.01 ACRES 75 A Acres: @C 0 Dewberry El -I The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • SECTION 8 APPENDICES • • The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan J APPENDIX A PROPERTY DEED • E q %Y PG L qy jC*. ` THIS pgED, made and dated this 1.1-1day of Nay, 1989, by and between N C 7�RTRIP. JR. and rNID R ARTRIp, husband and rife, parties of the first part, hereinafter called the Grantors; " 8'Tli��_LSMITLD ?R Tj�cRSHle. a VirOinia Malta partnership, party of the second part, herein after called the Grantees and DAVID B. Ho[,LIDAY. homme Bole, party of the third part. WITNSSSSTR: That for and in consideration of the aura of Ten Dollars and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors do grant and -convey, _ with General Warranty and English covenants of title unto the Gresstee, in fee simple, all the following described real estate: TRACT ONE, All of that certain tract of way, waYd together with all rights, rights PD improvements and appurtenances thereunto belonging, situated in Shawnee Hcontaining District, Frederick County. Virginia, containing 169.004 acres, as described by boundary survey drawn by Carl J. Rinker, C.'..5., dated February 27, 2989, revised April 28, 1989. and designated theca as 'Tract 1 attached hereto and .wade part hereof by this reference; and being portion Of dthe eedpofCeHconveyed to the leGrantor ugh G. Sloneker atuxdated herein by August 20, 1962, of recor.l in the Clerk's Oifiea of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia in Deed Book 2e! at page 221. T"ai�CT TWO: All of that certain tract off Mend t ather with all rights, rights tenances thereunto .improvements and appurHapiste:ial belonging, situa[ad in Shawnee containing District, Frederica County, Virginia, 0.915 acres, as described by krcundary survey drawn by Carl J. Rink.er. C.L.S., fated February 27. 1989, and designated thmro- as 'Tract 2', attached r, i I to W'j made rAQ is hereby descriptions �. «}. for more particular Itces therein contained W. sty hereby convoyed• right/ of �apanyaace is wade subject to all easements, �t # at�istilotiona of record, •fleetin g the aubject q property* their heirs and ,WAArors hereby reserve unto theesolvas, of right —Of- -exclusive t More than two aoaeuoseat/ . shall be wore than sixty (60) feet Bide, o! ahieD 'installation ate to bo used (1) for future utility i r� �• t,M f!'-` to Grantors' 3 psteip Cobteyed property edjecent retained f ; for future ingress to and ogres/ t tt�7 property. =t' over the herein conveyed p lros said The 't ,J by the GrenCee' e s } k �1 ��; laid' ess+m/ats shall ba Cetarnined N�s1i1laat when the natter development , plan for the be ehotin on r }yarNl if p.vgared. and said eascsenta ,. i_•r by shall {i Frederick County. ' s at and when submitted for approval kitviai Dy his joining in ?�"' of the third Dart, as e�ideacod sY . 1 i i W. - 1{ �•3z.ss.i _ 1 0.4 T Y`r4 A� 1 t\��xA�� iif'iMrF lf' "Pb * F�ii_ 0 6,plj izoo k"r d.F &P'tc C c'4 1.3 sx 7 13 Fc k 2 9 C"CA (D2X.4az Jar 38A.", 0. vr000pffaccooar do 4 r4" P Ityl. 'e c 3ov cge .0 4o*A: 245.0 P49-2ZI Aid -4-W-a RT' i t* Cqgl t0144 443"o 4mrto-4JPX v ;I q, -jf�' a.7 4 c r 1s al'Mr 3". 71' 444 i4s &*Jrd AP40 IZ A 0 A�_" '_.%,44.Y* of Cccot,0 p' ;,54, Wj&rjCA%. ILJ V%JO 0 war- 440.4w. of % *-oc ric Pi of rpt Ll . PCope Aoc4rco qaour -0:1& eqhcs dour-&- rq of Wiq6qcarcot, jr 4 '0 J.1 r-jt cows ?'LL14 rcD -t - iO3 :. rp rA. c. 440 44 7' 4 ligailpeca povd by CARL I RiNKER AND ASSM. Lm LAWYERS ROW WOODSTOCK, VA_ 22 PAO ape_ tea teS' 5; 17 -'3'W'O 1-1 Z�!- .� X T:-a. Zr7l 1060 'tj LI .: i i ' tf CARL _-1. & ASSOC1A1i&"'2 1 lad Sur+wron EnOnaan Land / wewi tiwyrn' Ruur (1) Woo&tock. VA LM14 These (2) tracts of land are located &boot 4% miles Southeast of the City of Vi&cheeter. Shawnee Magisterial District. rradariek County. Virginia and are deseribed by mates r..; boawds a& follows$ -MUM-, beginning at an iron rod found at a sooner with Tract-2 and Vernon L. Liehlitarl thence with the said Lichliter'a line and coatianing with Blesnor Jackson Burleson. mt. &1s. lines x 13' 12' 25" g 1,964.95 feet to as iron rod sett thence 2 820 K' 02" 2 361.34 feet to an iron rod matt thence s K' 30' 39" t 403.69 feet to a 38" detblo blank oak twos Commd at a career with V. IN Artrip. Jr.'a other land$ thsaee with the sai4 Aatrip's lines s 60a 21' 07" g 1,011.33 test to .a 22".double abostwt oak tract thence s 62e 330 38"'1 929.34 fast to a 16" *Is trail thane s 71e 14' 37" t 1.110.61 teat to a 10" wbits oak tzee fotad at a corner with Jame e. staftord..Jr.1 thence with the said Stafford's lines s 36a 19' 46" Y .174.84 feet.to an iron rcd toast at an angle in the old fonts{ thence •O 34' 39' Sell V 341,.02'teot to a wood tams past found, thugs s 19' 48' 14" V 71.43 fast to as iron rod sett thence s 19' 03' 30" V 740.16 Zest to an iron rod sat$ the*" s 17a 13' 22" V 409.60 Cast to a wood ,ones pet found, thence a 16' 23' 16" V 443.66•foot to a 10" Pita tree toted at e lance corner. a corner vith land eiained " Ralph H. Vakammal theses with the said Vak&man'r lines t 89' 33' 00" V 143.60 fast to a 12" whita oak tra, theta M 78' Q7' i3" V 1&.27 feet to &.12" whits ask creel thane S 86' 14' 31" V 363.71 tat to a tents post focal -braes with another of the said Wakeman's Bess and contieoing with the Frederick County Bmitati&n Asthority mod another of. the said Vakamen's lisle s 54e 03. 43" V 1.760.64 fat tb an Iron tod found at a cornsr with Iraq- 2; t'hsoes with a It&& of the said Sraat-2 ■ Ss' 12' 34"p 16003.22 tat to tke pint df beginning sad _At&:aias 1".009 Actor moss or lass. M ?, 3` ''rat . •. i. • � _ � . 1�... The Villages at Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • APPENDIX B WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT • • • WETLAND DELINEATION REPORT ARTRIP'PROPERTY FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO. 21-8232-A FOR ARTRIP LIMITED PARTNERSHIP c/o THE TOWER COMPANIES 0 APRIL 23, 2004 ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. Geotechnical t Construction Materials c Environmental -r Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E. Artrip Limited Partnership c/o The Tower Companies 11501 Huff Court North Bethesda, Maryland 20895 April 23, 2004 RECEIVED APR 2 6 2004 Dewberry -Winchester ECS Project No. 21-8232-A Reference: Wetland Delineation Report, ARTRIP Property, Frederick County, Virginia. Latitude: 39' 06' 30" N Longitude: 78' 10' 22" W Dear Mr. Segerman: Engineering Consulting Services (ECS) is pleased to present this detailed wetland delineation report for the above -referenced project. A detailed delineation entails the gathering of appropriate field data according to the 1987 U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual, field flagging and mapping of wetland and stream boundaries located on -site, preparation of a final report, and request to the USACE for confirmation and jurisdictional determination of U. S. Waters including wetlands identified on -site. Submission to the USACE for confirmation will be done with your permission. INTRODUCTION The ARTRIP Property project site is approximately 170+/- acres situated north of Fair Lawn Court in Frederick County, Virginia (Figure 1-1). The terrain of the project site consists of gently rolling hills and steep ravines, and is within the Opequon River drainage basin (Figure 1-2). Currently, the site is vacant with no indications of present use. SECONDARY INFORMATION Secondary Information entails the background research and review of recorded data and mapping pertaining to the project site. Resources include but are not limited to the: • U. S. Geological Survey (USGS) Topographic Map, Stephen City Quadrangle, Revised 1986 • U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), National Wetlands Inventory Map, Stephen City Quadrangle (On-line Interactive Mapper) • Frederick County Soil Survey, Natural Resources Conservation Service (MRCS) [_0 4026 Thunderbolt Place, Suite 100, Chantilly, VA 20151 e (703) 471-8400 • FAX (703) 834-5527 • www.ecslimited.com Aberdeen, MD* - Atlanta, GA Austin, TX - Baltimore, MD ' Chantilly, VA - Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL - Dallas, TX Danville, VA • Frederick, MD Fredericksburg, VA - Greensboro, NC Greenville, SC - Norfolk, VA - Orlando, FL • Raleigh, NC Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA - San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA Wilmington, NC - Winchester, VA* • York, PA* *Testing Services Only -0 Not to Scale Artrip Property Fair Lawn Court Frederick County, VA 4/2004 • Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. 14026 Thunderbolt Place Chantilly, VA 20151 0 Figure 1-1 DeLorme Mapping 1993 Project Area Location Map ECS Job# 21:8232A • 1 A10 i 1�1 le Not to Scale Artrip Property Fair Lawn Court Frederick County, VA 4/2004 Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. 14026 Thunderbolt Place Chantilly, VA 20151 Figure 1-2 USGS Topo Map Stephen City Quad. ECS Job# 01:8232A Artrip Limited Partnership ECS Project No. 21-8232-A April 23, 2004 _ Page 2 The USGS quad map shows an elevation of 650 feet above mean sea level (MSL) in the -- southern portion along an un-named tributary of Opequon Creek, 720 feet above MSL in the central portion, and 700 feet above MSL in the northern portion. The project area drains to the north to Opequon Creek and to the south to a tributary of Opequon Creek. The drainage divide is located in the central portion of the site. The NWI map depicts the pond in the central portion of the site, no other wetland or stream features are indicated on the NWI map within the property boundaries. The soil survey indicates that the site is underlain primarily by Berks channery silt loam, Clearbrook channery silt loam, and Weikert-Berks channery silt loam. None of the soils in Frederick County, Virginia are classified by the NRCS as hydric. r. FIELD INVESTIGATION Fieldwork was conducted during April 2004 using the Routine Determination Method as outlined in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Wetland flags were placed in the field by ECS and sequentially numbered to provide an onsite record of the location of wetlands and other waters subject to the jurisdiction of state and federal agencies. The data sheets used in this investigation are attached, along with the Delineation Map showing data point locations, and the approximate wetland and waters boundaries subject to the jurisdiction of state and/or federal agencies. Surveyed boundaries of the wetlands are available at Dewberry, LLC, Winchester Office. In addition, a photographic log of representative wetland and waters is attached. FINDINGS ECS has identified and located seven wetlands and 4 streams. Wetlands identified on the project site are classified as palustrine emergent (PEM), palustrine scrub/shrub (PEM/SS), and palustrine forested (PFO). Wetland vegetation is dominated by green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), seedboX (Ludwigia x lacustris), Frank's sedge (Carex frankii), and soft rush (Juncus effuses). The main source of hydrology for these wetlands includes ground water fluctuation and surface runoff. The wetlands are underlain by Berks channery silt loam and Weikert-Berks channery silt loam. REGULATORY DISCUSSION The USACE-Norfolk District and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) recently implemented the State Programmatic General Permit (SPGP) to streamline the permit process and avoid duplicity of agency review. For those projects impacting less than 0.5 acre of non -tidal wetlands and/or less than 300 linear feet of stream bed (SPGP 1 — Category A), DEQ will be responsible for review and authorization. For those projects impacting up to 1.0 acre of non -tidal wetlands and 300-2,000 linear feet of stream bed (SPGP 1 — Category B), both DEQ and the USACE will review these projects and make independent permit decisions. Notification of potential impacts should be filed with DEQ by completing Artrip Limited Partnership ECS Project No. 21-8232-A April 23, 2004 _ Page 3 I =� the Virginia Water Protection General Permit Registration Statement. Upon receipt of the completed registration statement, resource agency review will be initiated. Compensatory mitigation for unavoidable impacts to non -tidal waters and wetlands will generally be provided at a ratio of 2:1 for forested wetlands, 1.5:1 for scrub/shrub wetlands, 1:1 for emergent wetlands, and 1:1 for streams. Mitigation can include: the purchase or use of mitigation bank credits; wetland preservation; associated upland buffers, and in -lieu -fee contribution to the Virginia Wetland Restoration Trust Fund. PROCEEDINGS Upon your request, we will contact the USACE to schedule a field meeting to conduct a wetlands and waters boundary confirmation and jurisdictional determination. This process takes an average of two to three'weeks depending on the availability of USACE personnel. 'After the boundaries of the wetlands and waters have been confirmed by the USACE, we suggest that the areas be surveyed for future planning purposes and be submitted to the USACE as a final record. Once we have determined potential impacts we can assist you with permitting options. For now, we would suggest that a protected species records review and a historical records review be conducted for the project site. ECS would like to. thank Artrip Limited Partnership for the opportunity to provide you with this wetland delineation. We look forward to assisting you further with this project and other environmental concerns you may have. If you have any questions, please feel free to. contact me at 703-810-1317 (office) or 571-641-0376 Sincerely, ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. J es D. Su vironmental Group Manager cc: Mike Wiley - Dewberry, LLC (JPF/plg/environ/wetland projectslifiorello/files/2l-winchesteroffice/21-8232-A) • �.Lr ` ' 1�y � " �'-♦-`` I �?f,,' �'f ,/- ' / , /�J_'I Ix'r fr/r / ''� ' ` `` \`\at\'1 ♦" L ,�♦1 `\\ / /__ / ,i ,sill 1,1 111 ♦ a ��y / i ,iN II I�j 11, , ' /-`♦',`,r 1 ,11t 1" _ - ' j r' , % `` 1J/ \ 1 a i \` . ,, '.Ih'!�>tY % , / / 1 -•/l, 111 1 ♦ I r ` ' , 1 IL IL ` , ♦ I / 1 1 `.'�,%i L--7+/'i%sue --' r i fiir / , '��� �`'I,t ' �-- `� a♦ 111tq iigL\11' i / r / __♦ i i / ' ~�ir,l L J L 1 1 i L` 1'Lt tf II LL zr It 11' g Oi ' c`I ; '1 ' i 1` i I � 1 i 1 ♦a ,I I I ,` `�`. -` �=S r, it i ',; - ',f% '� '•`,, `Il --_-- ,♦, ; ; , -.\'♦ `'�; )Ill; 1�L. Ir . v ° \ t I �' ,\,n I I I 1 I / ♦` \- `, 1 a `__.1� =`♦ 1 Is In fJll�b� l K` • ,, `` , �,` / % � L- f 1 1 t `, ` `__`., _' ram\ 1 `1 ;\ ``-_\ ``�`, 1 :� -.' I_. ; ; `, •, ` •, -, 1 ; I �_ -` - . •, , I t �`, ''•a i ; it ,i \`♦1` `` a ; ; t ` ' `. ``. / I r J;J1q n 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 ` _ - . 1 ,• , / . / 1 '/fin ;. 1 J I ;'l1 , ; I W,� - ,`, , 1 1 11 - ,.., • ♦`,_i-,.__.,` a ,\ 1 ,- ' /: / ' 1I'I J+ so ' 1 1 ; , 1 ; , f , , , I,` `. V , `,'`•, , J r� ' Ip,,-�I'•;,`r_,--�__-1, L` , ` `- , ' 1 ( i ; �_�' f Il;l , y ,, _ ,__� ... , , ` `♦, •, I 1 , , ,I HILL, '1 II I �_ ``-_, '^♦ v ♦, , llso \ ♦ ` ' I , 1' 1 1-Ji'��� � 1 � 1 � ; , , `, 1 ; 1 ,I I � ♦ . ``, , r I 1 `'1'-`� ,+ �♦ -' i�i �t.� ,,` l to1' i I 1 \ S ,`I `r 1 I IIII � L 1 ♦ '\ 1\ . i III\1`I � � 1l\ `, It , � �� ' I .,. ` ,1, fI I ♦ • I /� li/ff \1, \ ♦ \ .. l '\` \I a� , 1 f t ` •1 1 / ' ♦ � / i //I r `,a` ♦ ` - ; - � ; 1w 1 \ Y♦ `', ,,I r l 1 r � �_--__.--i --� / I , L i,1 i1 �1II /"1 % I I / 1 \ , , ♦ `", a\\ ` ♦ I I I I I,;; / I,I 1411 11 / 1 1 `` 1 \ .` 1`�, ,„\`a `.- f/-`�,-_.'' .__ 1 1 , 111 l 1 , ♦ , , , N ,♦♦♦ ._�__ /,/!•'fir 1 111 / ' •1 �\ ♦ 1 -'-� ; • , , ' III / r' ,T w `���. `_ ' /'l1 , ♦ ;-'`„ij ,\I %„'\ ♦ -_ . ,; `` ` °,/ / ` 1 1il \, ` �=z]�i-'iiiiii����••/\'Y ♦�.-�._"�/' r f� /�� w I I / , I/I/,, ,\all„\ '/\ _�_. , , I / J,1 1, 1 M `. \`_'4 ,`I;\`. ,/ ff'IIJ�j{ CI -- _ ♦ , % /;1I1 '1/ I,11 IIt1t . •,� ,-, 11 ;/^ ; /--'-: ,. Illi -- - clot\:;:����._-;I�1//1 /f, „ _^ , , , 11 / I , I I -- -' ,:` 1 1 \ ,._ Y , i}R�� 1 _ iiiiii !1 1 / , r I , \I, �/ r I Y-'' rN, T�+`r , ll, . / I/rl „I, 11/ '-�•_ ice, .-/ 1 , I l f/t „ ,1 ,`,♦ ` -___. ,��-. \ ♦`, fill „ 1 ♦ `♦ / � ; 111 111 1 ,;l I,_ ^-_• ♦ ;,I ♦a \ \` t iZ��- 1 1 III ` � %-'- �,�y �I, /'„\,• r 11 ,, a,♦ } ' , , , lb ., ri l It , �N„ , 1 1I IIII I , - • / I , 1 , a ♦ , "rc.itp C=„ S.ro�r lop , a ,,'♦ • ..�. `,,1, / "per. iC ir:,.'C?.t ^'-iL, i •/ ""1'II t``, `i %,,, ♦. ✓ , , \I11 1 t /,//�'/i ' ',� ,-M Li , , a,,, � ♦ �1�J�11 �-_ t _Y` >*��--�z� �, +rl __ r 1 ``, \ , l / 1 1 1 '111 I ,. , r ,/i'' ' f L 1 , 1 \ ♦ ` ♦ I L;;11'lu I ,�,i,'�--`y1y_+ -1 a_= - (kl',� /, •„ , l ` L 1 L l 111. 11 1 , 1 1` 11, , l,LI (/ ; ' __. , ♦ `, ` \ 1 1 / 11 ' �.` ,, \ /r Yr`- /,,- I,1,71 I '< il ,♦1�i// 1 /l //1/f/I'r.�;; 1I' °v. `��`.`, ,, ' / �; a � °•, / I II 1�1 .:\`t.r=-. _ � I; 1 , --,I-'' / / / // I„-,,�"f%''''-'`., \,`, ``i ' `;.` L; I 11 \\, -_. / I J I / 1 / f / l/1 111� -.r`, \` \ ` -- / J r, r 1 ♦, , / {/ 11 I'^=-,, ,., t r : a - // 1 / , , , II 1, -'i/ ' / 11 ,_--`°,1 ' I I -' ; ' ;�;;'; , ,1 - ;;; ' Ir l ; 1 l r-- i '; : •';I /� , ": ,1 ;;I; j .1f't' 1a♦,♦l ,1 s�f. �,; , ' '' , , � l 11 III I , `, -`I r/, / , ` / I /;• / '-•' \ 1 ' �^+'-1;'♦ 1 ;�, ;;'. I L ;i % .=: . 1 I , , I I IIII 11 ♦ I f / I c, .` , l 1 � .� - , I'\ `�,; ,• I 1 '/' 1'=:'` � . -. ` L I' 1' l''I '' II , `, I I ' •. , \ l , ` , \,:-- . __ ,'I, 1/ , In1I4! ,'♦,, /'/ ' I ♦ ``I-- - I 1 /, %,/ ,,, 1 / ; ;III �Ih 11' I11, , I/11f'll �`1,/ III I r _ '•, L/, ,f ,, ., ,,, , / (ja IIII , / f i' ~l / J �, lI, II Irr'(YI , 1 I `ICJ"'1 I I 1; 1', r 1 ; ,to I j .' 1,1 , ; 1 , •/ i/'' , 1 I ; ,, `r1 `� : / ,/i,�,/I 1r /,, I / , ;', to �� .\ ,II /I'11'I ; //I _. , / ; \♦ l /i/// lrlr/!/;; IIr - ♦'It I '-` I,`I \•,; '., I,1;; IR /r If ,11 �;l' 11 1 f / , / I'' % r I L II';;. `,: ,I!/ ///' 1 ; ; '" J L I��; 1 I( I, I 1 ` , `, •, L, LI /'f I ,111 ,; / �' ; I /1�r 11, ��;I ��/� I 1 / , / r so /11 ,llfl - 111I, I//, ' _- ' / II 1 11 1 ♦ 1 r , jf//�/4f/ I L I J J I! f ,� / f , `` I/ // rII 1I //,f/', ,M1� 11!,,ryyY III 1 1 ♦` - ,, I , I � 1 \ • ; ' ,` � / . //,//,; ��� �, Iltl;' t' w d \ ` � ; I I //% // I Ir// / 1 ' 1. -rr_ ' • / I I ``-._ _ _-_ , ♦ / / ' /,` � ., `�,\`,t IIt•YYY l ;1 ONOil r bn i i t \ ` ` _ - ' 'i /- I , - - .I ♦ , I , I I „♦ ,`► a I , 1 '' ' i' 4ii/ Ii1 ;�;' ; i. .. ✓ i i : i l l 1 l \ ` % '-���!: ,�iii' rij:\i��♦f`��_S'=�� ---�����--_r' �' 1 L `, 1/1 / / f' ' ' ar vl i`�ia;lii�lnu •�`� - % ,.'I;t <^.i��_FJ' t` - i''+ i I i i � i : � - -- � �! : /'•.n11'•y'I n •���,,� `I '� ���`,�-'�e: �'Yj�'_- ,.-��'�� �-� tsF#� �- a `C�' ; , l i i � ; '-^'''s--fr-m}S.F=-iF'�4�►rain �'i r i li 1. tl t ti_ i-i / i // / / f _-�, `,' J / I `. ,\` __� r I r 1 Lx,l -tip �4' % J rrl / r - `" ., r l , / I I ,!1 I f 1♦ +iLr P, ; _,. 14 ., ; / " ' ,rl ,tl , C/v , ---- / / -^� yI/� �'/,/ / / i -/ ' _• r ` I ♦,,`• lot ais Sir, I ♦ , - - vl %`.Itl ILiY `a•; r ii '♦` ,I -`i ` I 1 i ` -_ - .. �-�-" '•__ ...� i I `` ,,t 's,' , it 1t / 1 r� - , L , , L` _ ,l /� ., \ ;tit, / ; , , i _ � `, l l r I,, .:._,, ,! /- `♦1;I`�; ,,♦ pal ♦�\ ♦__-�f/f/ f , 1, -^ , / ,•'� , ,,-` ,I \______ It I III -VP „ ,; \`_aFs 1 . . / , 1 i i i ,'-- /i f 1.- `_�`a : i` i r •__ ) ` , ,if : '� 'r' ' i //'ii J� I I "• `-' . i i I r --) / _I 1 1I ; I , I f Isfi�.. l r.,r 1 '-II ,L 1 I'1�I,' ii/, 1 1 „ 111, 1\ 11 , I i I I,I / Ihr 1-'�'-''=•-_' _� i' It \♦,` tat\ ,, a l l r f /I ,111 �:��;-_ �•. /,; , /; , �/ 1 , {, ;,-,; „ „ 1, ;,� r, a\♦♦ .wL I L • `♦ `� ` � / r/�''! 11 -ss ,9:,j'G � r ♦, , ` \,♦.,` ' I i�,� II!'f ) / ' __' 1I JI 1 ♦ ` I I /I, I 1 , / / 11 1 1 I ,111,``."-_ f��i''►�a tss r r(`Iu1 1 1 '' L - a .`.y r y,�_:��f /i i ,, ,, ```�' --'__' i ` ► `mod '^' IJIJt 11II� 1 1♦ `-. _.,a ` `/.^-`.` ` / , , ♦ , i ' - _ r /'/ 1 ` ^'/Y ,a� ♦ _ ,-� ��, ` _ ti �_,' 1 1 1 i i / ±` I 1 A—, \. 1 111 A I �'/ / 1 `i / /, // li, / . ,,,., , /, I \o`'�of % ,I \ ,` „— l,f / 1 r /• ' 1 1 `._.✓ 1 a t l r 1 1; I �'/ - 4�t.//J/1 I\\ ,I NP ,Y ' J/ \ 1 .I 11 Artrip Property Fair Lawn Court Frederick County, Virginia I Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. 14026 Thunderbolt Place Approximate Wetland Bound Location Ma C6aniilty,VA 20151 pp Boundary P ECS Job#: 21:8232A J d 0 1 ■ :J 0 DATASHEETS DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION —' (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) I. roject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/08/04 pplicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes [:]No Community ID PEM Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ®No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (if needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 1 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex frankii H OBL Ludwigia x lacustris H OBL Mimulus guttatus H OBL Toxicodendron radicans V FAC — rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 75% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other No Recorded Data Available . FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water Z3 u Depth to Free Water in Pit to Saturated Soil WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ® Inundated ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands 2.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves 1.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test 1.0 (in) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Wetland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/remarks: ❑ No indicators of wetland hydrology. ® Sufficient evidence of wetland hydro Project Name: SOILS ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: PEM Plot ID: DPI Map Unit Name (Series and Phase); Clearbrook Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ® YES ElNO Depth Horizon (inches) PROFILE DESCRIPTION Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 A/B IOYR 6/2 7.5YR 6/8 25% SILT LOAM ❑ Histosol ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Concretions ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) nyaric sous present? El Yes " No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ® Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles i�emaIKS WETLAND DFTFRMTNATTCIN Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® YES ❑ NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ❑ No Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks: I zi DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 0 Page 2 1 Lii I D M I DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) i oject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/08/04 pplicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID UPLAND Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (if needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 2 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Arthraxon hispidus H NI Cirsium horridulum H FACU- Solidago altissima H FACU- Blephilia hirsuta H FACU- ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ❑ Greater than 50% dominance of hydiophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits FIELD OBSERVATIONS ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water 0.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test El Other (Explain in Remarks) epth to Saturated Soil 0.0 (in) -her (explain): Wetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/remarks: ® No indicators of wetland hydrology. ❑ Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: UPLAND Plot ID: DP2 SOILS c f E 1:11, I �il` a�pUnit�Name(Series and Phase): Clearbrook Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑YES NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 AB IOYR 5/4 - - SANDY SILT HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in. Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles Remarks: WETLAND DFTF,RMTNATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ®No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ❑ YES ® NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ® No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes ® No Remarks: I =DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION • Page: I :J DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) roject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID PEM/PSS Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (if needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 3 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex ftankii H OBL Lobelia cardinalis H FACW+ Ilex verticillata H FACW+ Lonicera japonica H FAC- — ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 75% Hydrophytie vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. y HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑.Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ® Aerial Photographs ® Inundated ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines El Deposits FIELD OBSERVATIONS ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water 1.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves a Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) epth to Saturated Soil 0.0 (in) Wetland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/remarks: ❑ No indicators of wetland hydrology. 0 Sufficient evidence of wetland hydr( Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY SOILS Community ID: PEMIPSS Plot ID: DP3 Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained axonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑ YES ® NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-4 A 10YR 4/2 - - SILT LOAM 4-12 . B 10YR 5/2 10YR 5/8 25% SILT LOAM HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ® Concretions: Mg ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) r•Hy Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ® Chroma of 2 with mottles ElChroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles - Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® YES ❑ NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ❑ No Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks: ' a DATA FORM —ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 0 Page DATA FORM I 1 a ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) roject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes [:]No Community ID UPLAND Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (if needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 4 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Lonicera japonica H FAC- Andropogon virginicus H FACU Rosa multiora H FACU —' Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ❑ Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Inundated ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines FIELD OBSERVATIONS ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water 0.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test turated Soil 0.0 (in) El Other (Explain in Remarks) epth to Sa ther (explain): Wetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/remarks: ® No indicators of wetland hydrology. ❑ Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY SOILS Community ID: UPLAND Plot ID: DP4 i I i L� M�Unitme (Series and �Phase):�Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ® YES ❑ NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure etc. 0-3 A 10YR 3/2 - - SILT LOAM 3-16 B lOYR 5/4 - - GRAVELY LOAM HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) —Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ® No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ❑ YES ® NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ® No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes ® No Remarks: ' a DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 0 Page DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) roject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID PEM Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 5 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION iDominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex frankii H OBL Ilex verticillata H FACW+ Agrostis alba H FACW i i Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100% j Hydrophytic vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) El. Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water Depth to Free Water in Pit epth to Saturated Soil er (explain): Wetland hydrology present? Rationale for decision/remarks: 1.0 (in) 0.0 (in) 0.0 (in) ® Yes ❑ No No indicators of wetland hydrology. Sufficient evidence of wetland hydro WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ® Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY SOILS Community ID: PEM Plot ID: DP5 A 1 Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained axonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑ YES ® NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-4 A 1 OYR 4/2 - - SILT LOAM 4-12 . B 10YR 5/2 10YR 5/8 25% SILT LOAM HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ® Concretions: Mg ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) —Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ® Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® YES ❑ NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ❑ No Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks: DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION -4 Page DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) Project/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes [:]No Community ID UPLAND Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 6 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Cirsium vulgare H FACU- Rosa multiflora H FACU Andropogon virginicus H FACU Rubus arcticus. H NI —� Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ❑ Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water 0.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) epth to Saturated Soil 0.0 (in) ther (explain): Wetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/remarks: ® No indicators of wetland hydrology. ❑ Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: UPLAND Plot ID: DP6 I SOILS E r t i Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ®YES ❑ NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-3 A 10YR 3/2 - - SILT LOAM 3-16 B 10YR 5/4 - - GRAVELY LOAM HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfrdic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Yes ® No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles .Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ® No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ❑ YES ® NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ® No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes ® No Remarks: ' , DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Page I71 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) roject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RTC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID PEM Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 7 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex ftankii H OBL Ilex verticillata H FACW+ Agrostis alba H FACW Pycnanthemum flexuosum H FACW Festuca prdtensis H FACU- ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 80% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other LJ No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water a � Depth to Free Water in Pit to Saturated Soil WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ® Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands 1.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test 0.0 (in) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Wetland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/remarks: ❑ No indicators of wetland hydrology. ® Sufficient evidence of wetland hydri Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY SOILS Community ID: PEM Plot ID: DP7 G Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑ YES ® NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-4 A 1 OYR 4/2 - - SILT LOAM 4-12 . B 1 OYR 5/2 I OYR- 518 25% SILT LOAM HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ® Concretions Mg ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List W❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) ric soils present? ®Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ® Chroma-of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Wetland Hydrology Present? Hydric Soils Present? Remarks: ® Yes ❑ No ® Yes [:]No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® YES ® Yes ❑ No ' PATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 1,* ❑ NO Page 2 1 J DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) roject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID UPLAND Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 8 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION j Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species 7Str7atum�Indicator� Cirsium vulgare H FACU- Rosa multiflora H FACU Andropogon virginicus H FACU a i Percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ❑ Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS a Depth of Surface Water 0.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) El Other (Explain in Remarks) epth to Saturated Soil 0.0 (in) ther (explain): Wetland hydrology present? El Yes ® No Rationale for decision/remarks: ® No indicators of wetland hydrology. ❑ Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: UPLAND Plot ID: DP8 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ® YES ❑ NO r PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color inches) (Munsell Moist) Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-3 A 10YR 3/2 - - SILT LOAM i 3-16. B lOYR 5/4 - - GRAVELY LOAM I HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions -{ (] Histic Epipedon El High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils i ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) 'Hydric soils present? . ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles i ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles 7 Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ® No Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ® No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ❑ YES ® NO Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes ® No Remarks: DATA FORM - ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION Page L� DATA FORM I ROUTINE WETLAND DIETERMINATION (198.7 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) oject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY *,pplicant Date 04/15/04 / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID PEM/PSS Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 9 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION 1 Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex frankii H OBL Ludwigia alata H OBL Juncus effusus H FACW+ Toxicodendron radicans V FAC rcent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 75% :71Iydrophytic vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. `i HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑• Other Primary Indicators: ® Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water 2.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) . ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Depth to Saturated Soil 0.0 (in) er (explain): tland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Oationalefor decision/remarks: ❑ No indicators of wetland hydrology. ® Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: PEMIPSS Plot ID: DP9 SOILS Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Clearbrook Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: poorly drained axonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ® YES ❑ NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inchesHorizon ( ) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 B 1OYR 4/2 1OYR 5/6 15% SILT LOAM i HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ® Concretions Mg ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric soils present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ® Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles y Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® YES ❑ NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ❑ No Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks: =DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 4 Page i A DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1957 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) oject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RJC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID UPLAND Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (if needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 10 Etionlanaof atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Rosa multiora H FACU Andropogon virginicus H FACU Juniperus virginiana H FACU Diospyros virginiana H FAC- —percent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 0% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ❑ Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. 7 HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) ❑. Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other ❑ No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water Depth to Free Water in Pit pth to Saturated Soil WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ❑ Inundated ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ❑ Drainage Patterns in Wetlands 0.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test ❑ 0.0 (in) Other (Explain in Remarks) Wetland hydrology present? ❑ Yes ® No Rationale for decision/remarks: ® No indicators of wetland hydrology. n Sufficient evidence of wetland hvdr( Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: UPLAND SOILS Plot ID: DP 10 14 1 -j Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Clearbrook Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: poorly drained Taxonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑ YES ® NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Horizon Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (inches) (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 B 10YR 5/4 - - GRAVELY LOAM i HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Hydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑' Yes ® No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles.❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ❑ Chroma of 1 with or without mottles Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ❑ Yes ® No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ❑ YES ® NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ❑ Yes ® No Hydric Soils Present? ❑ Yes ® No Remarks: ' a DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION t Page The EDR Radius MapTM Report Artrip ESA Undeveloped Property Frederick County, VA 22655 Inquiry Number: 01155029.1r March 22, 2004 R" Environmental Data Resources Inc The Standard in Environmental Risk Management Information 440 Wheelers Farms Road Milford, Connecticut 06460 Nationwide Customer Service Telephone: 1-800-352-0050 Fax: 1-800-231-6802 Internet: www.edrnet.com s r<- I�i 1 t. TABLE OF CONTENTS', SECTION PAGE ExecutiveSummary----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ES1 Overview Map---------------------------- ---------- 2 Detail Map_ _ Map Findings Summary--------------------------------------------------- 4 Map Findings--------------------------------- ----- 6 --------------------- Orphan Summary-------------------------- --------. 7 ---------------------- Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM GeoCheck - Not Requested Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This report contains information obtained from a variety of public and other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT, ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL EDR BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. It can not be concluded from this report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. Any analyses, estimates, ratings or risk codes provided in this report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Any liability on the part of EDR is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid for this report. Copyright 2004 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TC01155029.1 r Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). The report meets the government records search requirements of ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-00. Search distances are per ASTM standard or custom distances requested by the user. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 22655 I I COORDINATES Latitude (North): 39.109800 - 39' 6' 35.3" I Longitude (West): 78.173800 - 78' 10' 25.7" Universal Tranverse Mercator: Zone 17 UTM X (Meters): 744373.6 UTM Y (Meters): 4332556.5 Elevation: 687 ft. above sea level USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY F3 Target Property: 39078-A2 STEPH ENS CITY, VA Source: USGS 7.5 min quad index i TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR's search of available ( "reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the ASTM E 1527-00 search radius around the target property for the following databases: FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NIPL ------------------------- National Priority List Proposed NPL-------------- Proposed National Priority List Sites CERCLIS--------------------. Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERC-NFRAP---------------- CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned CORRACTS__________________ Corrective Action Report RCRIS-TSD------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-LQG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System RCRIS-SQG------------------ Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System ERNS------------------------ Emergency Response Notification System STATE ASTM STANDARD SHWS------------------------ This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. TC01155029.1r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 • • 1 EXECUTIVES.UMMARY SWF/LF---------------------- Solid Waste Management Facilities LUST------------------------. Leaking Underground Storage Tank Information System UST-------------------------- Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks VA VRP---------------------- Voluntary Remediation Program LTANKS--------------------- Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT------------------- Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD------------------------- Records Of Decision Delisted NPL---------------. National Priority List Deletions FINDS------------------------ Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report HMIRS_______________________ Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System MILTS------------------------ Material Licensing Tracking System MINES ---- ------------------- Mines Master Index File NPL Liens___________________ Federal Superfund Liens PADS------------------------ PCB Activity Database System US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites DOD------------------------- Department of Defense Sites RAATS----------------------- RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System TRIS_________________________ Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA________________________ Toxic Substances Control Act ,,SSTS------------------------- Section 7 Tracking Systems FTTS INSP------------------- FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST -------------------------- __ Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks VA Spills--------------------- Pollution Complaint Database CEDS________________________ Comprehensive Environmental Data System EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Coal Gas_____________________ Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites BROWNFIELDS DATABASES US BROWNFIELDS---------- A Listing of Brownfields Sites VA VRP---------------------- Voluntary Remediation Program INST CONTROL -------------- Voluntary Remediation Program Database SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were not identified. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. TC01 155029.1 r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 • w f • I• EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped: Site Name Database(s) STEPHENS CITY PCB FREDERICK COUNTY-WINCHESTER SANITARY LAN FREDERICK COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL COUNTY OF FREDERICK CDD LANDFILL TECHNICON CORP. CLARKE COUNTY SINKHOLE - BARTLES RESIDEN OLD STEPHENS CITY SCHOOL COMPLEX ROBERT AYLOR MIDDLE FULTON TRUCKING PROPERTY RED APPLE-STEPHENS CITY G A JENKINS RESIDENCE KERNSTOWN SHELL FORMER ARA/SMITH'S GENSTAR STONE ALLEGHENY POWER MEADOWBROOKE SUBSTATION STEPHEN CITY HIGHS ARTHUR H. FULTON, INC HEYMAN JOHN GENSTAR STONE PRODUCTS STEPHENS CITY PLANT WHITE OAK TRADING POST SHEN-VALLEY LIME CORPORATION WINCHESTER BUILDING SUPPLY CO DARLINGTON J P W W CARLISLE ESTATE CLARKE MOTORS INC E R NEFF EXCAVATING INC STICKLEY FORD INC SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO INC SOUTHLAND CORP THE POTOMAC INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS INC CERC-NFRAP SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF LUST, LTANKS LUST, UST, LTANKS LUST, LTANKS LUST, LTANKS LUST, LTANKS LUST;LTANKS LUST, UST, LTANKS LUST, LTANKS LTANKS UST UST UST UST UST UST FINDS, UST UST UST UST UST RCRIS-SQG, FINDS RCRIS-SQG, FINDS RCRIS-SQG, FINDS RCRIS-SQG, FINDS RCRIS-SQG, FINDS TC01 155029.1 r EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 OVERVIEW MAP - 011 SSWA 1 r - Fr—q A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Coal Gasification Sites National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites Dept. Defense Sites TARGET PROPERTY: Artrip ESA ADDRESS: Undeveloped Property CITY/STATE/ZIP: Frederick County VA 22655 LAT/LONG: 39.1098 / 78.1738 1 Mlles Oil & Gas pipelines II Federal Wetlands CUSTOMER: ECS CONTACT: Stuart B. Mayberry INQUIRY #: 01155029.1 r DATE: March 22, 2004 10:43 am Copyrighl (0 2003 EDR. Inc. (C� 2003 GDT. Inc. Rol. 07/2003. All Rights Reserved Target Property i A Sites at elevations higher than or equal to the target property • Sites at elevations lower than the target property 1 Coal Gasification Sites Sensitive Receptors National Priority List Sites Landfill Sites `Dept. Defense Sites DETAIL MAP - 01155029.1 r - ECS 0 1 /16 Ile 114 Mile. Oil & Gas pipelines Federal Wetlands TARGET PROPERTY: Artrip ESA CUSTOMER: ECS ADDRESS: Undeveloped Property CONTACT: Stuart B. Mayberry CITY/STATE/ZIP: Frederick County VA22655 INQUIRY#: 01155029.1r LAT/LONG: 39.1098 / 78.1738 DATE: March 22, 2004 10:43 am Gcpynghl : 2003 EDP. Inc . 2003 GDT Inc. Rel 07,2003 All Riahls Res. — MAP FINDINGS'-S.U.MMARY;.,: Search Target Distance Database Property (Miles) < 118 1/8-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-1 > 1 Total Plotted FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD NPL Proposed NPL 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 I CERCLIS 1.000 0.500 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 CERP 0.250 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 RRACTS 1.000 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRIS-TSD RCACTS 0.500 0 0 0 0 0 NR 0 RCRIS Lg. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 RCRIS Sm. Quan. Gen. 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 ERNS NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0TP 0 STATE ASTM STANDARD j State Haz. Waste State Landfill N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A ' LUST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 UST 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VRP 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 LTANKS 0.500 0.500 0 0 0 0 NR NR 0 0 0 NR NR 0 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL CONSENT 1.000 0 0 0 0 NR 1.000 0 0 0 0 0 Delisted NPL 1.000 0 0 0 NR 0 FINDS HMIRS TP NR NR NR 0 NR NR NR 0 0 M TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 MINES N TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 NPL Liens 0.250 TP 0 0 NR NR NR 0 PADS TP NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR 0 DOD 1.000 0 0 0 NR 0 NR 00 RAATS TRIS TP NR NR NR NR NR NR 0 TSCA TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 FT FITS TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 STATE OR LOCAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL AST VA Spills TP NR NR NR NR NR 00 CEDS TP NR NR NR NR NR TP NR NR NR NR NR 0 EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Coal Gas 1,000 0 0 0 0 NR 0 I• TC01155029.1r Page 4 lip 10 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search Target Distance Total Database Property (Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted BROWNFIELDS DATABASES US BROWNFIELDS 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 VRP 0.500 0 0 0 NR NR 0 INST CONTROL 0.250 0 0 NR NR NR 0 NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database N/A = This State does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list. TC01155029.1 r Page 5 Ma ID P MAP FINDINGS•; Direction Distance Distance ((t.) EDR ID Number Elevation Site Database(s) EPA ID Number I I i Coal Gas Site Search: No site was found in a search of Real Property Scan's ENVIROHAZ database. NO SITES FOUND s TC01155029.1 r Page 6 City BERRYVILLE FREDERICK COUNTY FREDERICK COUNTY FREDERICK COUNTY FREDERICK COUNTY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEPHENS CITY STEVENS CITY WINCHESTER WINCHESTER WINCHESTER WINCHESTER WINCHESTER WINCHESTER ORPH iv SUMMARY EDR ID Site Name Site Address S105051797 CLARKE COUNTY SINKHOLE - BARTLES RESIDEN RT 672 S105425975 FREDERICK COUNTY-WINCHESTER SANITARY LAN FOUR MILES EAST OF WINCHESTER, NEAR INTERSECTION S105425976 FREDERICK COUNTY SANITARY LANDFILL 280 LANDFILL RD. OFF CO. HIGHWAY 655 SULFUR SPRI S105426006 COUNTY OF FREDERICK CDD LANDFILL OFF COUNTY RT 655 SULFUR SPRINGS RD), 1 MILE WEST S105425980 TECHNICON CORP. TECHNICON CORP. ROUTE 11 SOUTH MIDDLETON, VA 226 1004790470 E R NEFF EXCAVATING INC RT 1 BOX 377 COUNTY RD 0003695897 ALLEGHENY POWER MEADOWBROOKE SUBSTATIOI RTE 11 & 638 0003695959 OLD STEPHENS CITY SCHOOL COMPLEX RTE 11 & SCHOOL'ST 1000448224 STICKLEY FORD INC RTE 2 BOX 289 S104408558 ROBERT AYLOR MIDDLE RTE 2 BOX 14 1000582251 SWIFT TRANSPORTATION CO INC RT 227E S104468436 FULTON TRUCKING PROPERTY RTE 277 / 636 0003693043 STEPHEN CITY HIGHS ROUTE 277 0003693304 ARTHUR H. FULTON, INC RTE 277 & 636 S104408416 RED APPLE-STEPHENS CITY RTE 3 BOX 1 0003693695 HEYMAN JOHN RTE 50 E 1003866734 STEPHENS CITY PCB ROUTE 631 WEST S105860563 GENSTAR STONE ROUTE 631 0003694938 GENSTAR STONE PRODUCTS STEPHENS CITY PLAN ROUTE 631 1000460041 SOUTHLAND CORP THE ROUTE642 1004790628 POTOMAC INDUSTRIAL TRUCKS INC RTE 642 0003694229 WHITE OAK TRADING POST STATE HWY 277 1004610354 SHEN-VALLEY LIME CORPORATION ROUTE T-531 S105986280 G A JENKINS RESIDENCE RTE 1 BOX 35 0003694906 KERNSTOWN SHELL RTE 11 S S104795459 FORMER ARA/SMITH'S RTE 6 BOX 108 0003693175 WINCHESTER BUILDING SUPPLY CO ROUTE 6 BOX 152 AA 0003694833 DARLINGTON J P RTE 6 BOX 173 0003694708 W W CARLISLE ESTATE RTE 6, BOX 113 0003693600 CLARKE MOTORS INC RTE 7 BOX 117 Zip Database(s) 22602 LUST, LTANKS SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF SWF/LF 22655 RCRIS-SQG, FINDS 22655 UST 22655 LUST, UST, LTANKS 22655 RCRIS-SQG, FINDS 22655 LUST, LTANKS 22655 RCRIS-SQG, FINDS 22655 LUST, LTANKS 22655 UST 22655 UST 22655 LUST, LTANKS 22655 UST 22655 CERC-NFRAP 22655 LTANKS 22655 UST 22655 RCRIS-SQG, FINDS 22655 RCRIS-SQG, FINDS 22655 UST 22655 FINDS, UST 22655 LUST, LTANKS 22602 LUST, UST, LTANKS 22602 LUST, LTANKS 22602 UST 22602 UST 22602 UST 22602 UST TCO'1155029.1 r Page 7 r;^ r] GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / UATA:CURRENCY TRACKING To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Elapsed ASTM days: Provides confirmation that this EDR report meets or exceeds the 90-day updating requirement of the ASTM standard. FEDERAL ASTM STANDARD' RECORDS NPL: National Priority List Source: EPA Telephone: N/A National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 01/29/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/27/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA's Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 Telephone 617-918-1143 EPA Region 3 Telephone 215-814-5418 EPA Region 4 Telephone 404-562-8033 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Date of Government Version: 01/07/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/27/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/06/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/06/04 EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6774 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/06/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 21 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/06/04 GERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 11/17/03 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/22/03 Elapsed ASTM days: 42 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/22/03 CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 As of February 1995, CERCLIS sites designated "No Further Remedial Action Planned" (NFRAP) have been removed from CERCLIS. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without the need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Federal Superfund action or NPL consideration. EPA has removed approximately 25,000 NFRAP sites to lift the unintended barriers to the redevelopment of these properties and has archived them as historical records so EPA does not needlessly repeat the investigations in the future. This policy change is part of the EPA's Brownfields Redevelopment Program to help cities, states, private investors and affected citizens to promote economic redevelopment of unproductive urban sites, TC01155029.1r Page GR-1 0 y GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/17/03 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/22/03 Elapsed ASTM days: 42 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/22/03 CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/18/03 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/26/03 Elapsed ASTM days: 38 Dale of Last EDR Contact: 03/08/04 RCRIS: Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System. RCRIS includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defin ed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs): generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Small quantity generators (SQGs): generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Large quantity generators (LQGs): generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator off -site to a facility that can recycle, treat,'store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 01/12/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/19/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 02/10/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 22 Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/19/04 ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-2 60-2342 Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 12/31/03 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 01/26/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/12/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 46 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/26/04 FEDERAL ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS BRS: Biennial Reporting System Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LOG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/01/01 Database Release Frequency: Biennially Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/16/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/04 CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Source: EPA Regional Offices Telephone: Varies Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: Varies Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A TC01155029.1r Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SE' ARCHE®..[b..ATQa,;. .URR,ENCY TRACKING ROD: Records Of Decision Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 01/09/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/06/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/04 DELISTED NPL: National Priority List Deletions Source: EPA Telephone: N/A The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 01/29/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/06/04 Dale of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/01/04 FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Identification Initiative Program Summary Report Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and 'pointers' to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 02/09/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/06/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/04 HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/18/03 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/19/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/04 MILTS: Material Licensing Tracking System Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 01/15/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Master Index File Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Date of Government Version: 11/25/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/06/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner receives notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. TC01155029.1 r Page GR-3 C -o -I* GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/15/91 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/12/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/24/04 PADS: PCB Activity Database System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-3887 PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB's who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 12/30/03 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/09/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/04 DOD:. Department of Defense Sites Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-5423 This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 10/01/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually STORMWATER: Storm Water General Permits Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202 564-0746 A listing of all facilities with Storm Water General Permits. Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/02/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Nezt Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities —especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots --minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients -States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 07/15/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/15/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/14/04 RMP: Risk Management Plans Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst -case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. TC01155029.1r Page GR-4 .. .. ��. .:::... ' GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED;-/,!., o-p. :D.AT��,C,I RRENCY:.TRACKING /� Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/95 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/08/04 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/07/04 TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. i Date of Government Version: 12/31/01 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/22/03 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/04 TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 M Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/02 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/05/04 Database Release Frequency: Every 4 Years Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/07/04 FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2501 Date of Government Version: 01/21/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/22/03 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/04 • SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-5008 Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide -producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1 st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active Ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/01 Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/19/04 Database Release Frequency: Annually Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/19/04 FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) Source: EPA/Office of Prevention. Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-564-2501 FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right -to -Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. TC01 155029.1 r Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED /DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/30/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly STATE OF VIRGINIA ASTM STANDARD RECORDS Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/22/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/22/04 SHWS: This state does not maintain a SHWS list. See the Federal CERCLIS list and Federal NPL list. Source: EPA Telephone: 703-413-0223 State Hazardous Waste Sites. State hazardous waste site records are the states' equivalent to CERCLIS. These sites may or may not already be listed on the federal CERCLIS list. Priority sites planned for cleanup using state funds (state equivalent of Superfund) are identified along with sites where cleanup will be paid for by potentially responsible parties. Available information varies by state. Date of Government Version: N/A Date of Data Arrival at EDR: N/A Date Made Active at EDR: N/A Elapsed ASTM days: N/A Database Release Frequency: N/A Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/19/04 SWF/LF: Solid Waste Management Facilities Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4238 Solid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 10/01/02 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 10/08/02 Date Made Active at EDR: 10/22/02 Elapsed ASTM days: 14 Database Release Frequency: Quarter) Y Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/09/04 UST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804=527-5249 (, Registered Underground Storage Tanks. UST's are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Available information varies by state program. Date of Government Version: 12/05/03 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/29/03 Date Made Active at EDR: 01/12/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 14 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 VRP: Voluntary Remediation Program Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4232 The Voluntary Cleanup Program encourages owners of elected contaminated sites to take the initiative and conduct voluntary cleanups that meet state environmental standards. Date of Government Version: 02/02/04 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 02/03/04 Date Made Active at EDR: 03/04/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 30 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/26/04 LUST REG SC: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Quality, South Central Region Telephone: 434-582-5120 Date of Government Version: 12/30/03 Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/31/03 Date Made Active at EDR: 01/12/04 Elapsed ASTM days: 12 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 1 TC01 155029.1 r Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED. %:DATA"CUkRENCY TRACKING i LTANKS: Leaking Petroleum Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4269 Includes releases of petroleum from underground storage tanks and aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 12/05/03 Dale Made Active at EDR: 01/12/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly STATE OF VIRGINIA ASTM SUPPLEMENTAL RECORDS AST: Registered Petroleum Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4317 Registered Aboveground Storage Tanks. Date of Government Version: 12/05/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Data Arrival at EDR: 12/29/03 Elapsed ASTM days: 14 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Dale of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 SPILLS: Pollution Complaint Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-527-5200 Pollution Complaints Database. The pollution reports contained in the PC database include the initial release reporting of Leaking Underground Storage Tanks and all other releases of petroleum to the environment as well as releases to state waters. The database is current through 1211/93. Since that time, all spill and pollution . . reporting information has been collected and tracked through the DEQ regional offices. Date of Government Version: 06/01/96 Database Release Frequency: No Update Planned Date of Last EDR Contact: 09/25/96 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A CEDS: Comprehensive Environmental Data System Source: Department of Environmental Quality I Telephone: 804-698-4077 ( Virginia Water Protection Permits, Virginia Pollution Discharge System (point discharge) permits and Virginia Pollution Abatement (no point discharge) permits. Date of Government Version: 01/06/04 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually SPILLS: PREP Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Valley Regional Office Telephone: 540-574-7800 Date of Government Version: 12/31/03 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS PD: PREP Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Piedmont Region Telephone: 804-527-5020 Date of Government Version: 04/25/02 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS TD: PREP Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Tidewater Region Telephone: 757-518-2177 Date of Government Version: 02/03/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly • Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/06/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/05/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/02/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 TC01155029.1r Page GR-7 i 4� Ii GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS NO: PREP Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality, Northern Region Telephone: 703-583-3864 Date of Government Version: 01/31/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) LUST Records LUST REG NO: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Tracking Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality Northern Regional Office Telephone: 703-583-3822 Date of Government Version: 10/30/02 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG PD: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Department of Environmental Quality Piedmont Regional Office Telephone: 804-527-5020 Date of Government Version: 12/02/03 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG SW: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality Southwest Regional Office Telephone: 504-676-5507 Date of Government Version: 12/09/03 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG TD: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites Source: Department of Environmental Quality Tidewater Regional Office Telephone: 757-518-2198 Date of Government Version: 01/05/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG VA: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Source: Department of Environmental Quality Valley Regional Office Telephone: 540-574-7800 Date of Government Version: 08/01/01 Database Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG WC: Leaking Underground Storage Tank List Source: Department of Environmental Quality West Central Regional Office Telephone: 540-562-6700 Date of Government Version: 12/25/03 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG SC: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks Source: Department of Environmental Quality, South Central Region Telephone: 434-582-5120 Date of Government Version: 12/30/03 Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 03/02/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/31/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 02/09/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/10/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 Date of Last EDR Contact: 12/29/03 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/29/04 TC01155029.1 r Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED,'/,.DATA.CURRENC TRACKING T EDR PROPRIETARY HISTORICAL DATABASES Former Manufactured Gas (Coal Gas) Sites: The existence and location of Coal Gas sites is provided exclusively to EDR by Real Property Scan, Inc. ©Copyright 1993 Real Property Scan, Inc. For a technical description of the types of hazards which may be found at such sites, contact your EDR customer service representative. K-] Disclaimer Provided by Real Property Scan, Inc, The information contained in this report has predominantly been obtained from publicly available sources produced by entities other than Real Property Scan. While reasonable steps have been taken to insure the accuracy of this report, Real Property Scan does not guarantee the accuracy of this report. Any liability on the part of Real Property Scan is strictly limited to a refund of the amount paid. No claim is made for the actual existence of toxins at any site. This report does not constitute a legal opinion. BROWNFIELDS DATABASES VRP: Voluntary Remediation Program Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4232 The Voluntary Cleanup Program encourages owners of elected contaminated sites to take the initiative and conduct voluntary cleanups that meet state environmental standards. Date of Government Version: 02/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/26/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/04 .INST CONTROL: Voluntary Remediation Program Database Source: Department of Environmental Quality Telephone: 804-698-4498 Sites included in the Voluntary Remediation Program database that have deed restrictions. Date of Government Version: 02/02/04 Database Release Frequency: Quarterly Date of Last EDR Contact: 01/26/04 Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/26/04 US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Included in the listing are brownfields properties addresses by Cooperative Agreement Recipients and brownfields properties addressed by Targeted Brownfields Assessments. Targeted Brownfields Assessments-EPA's Targeted Brownfields Assessments (TBA) program is designed to help states, tribes, and municipalities —especially those without EPA Brownfields Assessment Demonstration Pilots --minimize the uncertainties of contamination often associated with brownfields. Under the TBA program, EPA provides funding and/or technical assistance for environmental assessments at brownfields sites throughout the country. Targeted Brownfields Assessments supplement and work with other efforts under EPA's Brownfields Initiative to promote cleanup and redevelopment of brownfields. Cooperative Agreement Recipients -States, political subdivisions, territories, and Indian tribes become BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients when they enter into BCRLF cooperative agreements with the U.S. EPA. EPA selects BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients based on a proposal and application process. BCRLF cooperative agreement recipients must use EPA funds provided through BCRLF cooperative agreement for specified brownfields-related cleanup activities. - Date of Government Version: N/A Database Release Frequency: Semi -Annually OTHER DATABASE(S) Date of Last EDR Contact: N/A Date of Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. Oil/Gas Pipelines: This data was obtained by EDR from the USGS in 1994. It is referred to by USGS as GeoData Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps. It was extracted from the transportation category including some oil, but primarily gas pipelines. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: (800) 823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy norwarrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. TC01155029.1r Page GR-9 I �* r• GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers. and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone:312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association's annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone:410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone:301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United Stales. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are . comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics' primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 804-692-1900 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 1999 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2003 Geographic Data Technology, Inc., Rel. 07/2003. This product contains proprietary and confidential property of Geographic Data Technology, Inc. Unauthorized use, including copying for other than testing and standard backup procedures, of this product is expressly prohibited. TC01155029.1r Page GR-10 QUALIFICATIONS 11 ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. 1.0 CORPORATE QUALIFICATIONS Engineering Consulting Sen�ices, Ltd. (ECS, Ltd.) was incorporated in 198i" to meet the grotiving needs of our clients as a multi -service engineering firm. The managing principals of ECS, Ltd. average over 20 years of experience in their respective fields. Our staff of over 425 people includes registered professional engineers, environmental geologists, hvdrogeologists, certified engineering technicians and support personnel. ECS, Ltd. places great emphasis on the individual qualifications and experience of its technical staff. Our geotechnical and environmentai engineers hold Masters or Doctorate degrees in engineering and are well - versed in the subsurface conditions typically found in the Mid -Atlantic region. Our senior environmental personnel have performed a variety of environmentally -related services for major corporations on projects in over 20 states and four countries. ECS, Ltd. engineering technicians are certified by such recognized organizations as the American* Concrete Institute (ACI), the Washington Area Council of Engineering Laboratories (WACEL), the American Welding Society (AWS), and the Roofing Industry Educational Institute (RIEI). In addition, we have developed and implemented our own in-house training, certification and QA/ QC programs. ECS, Ltd. emphasizes quality and responsive service to our clients in solving problems and providing innovative engineering and scientific analysis. With our corporate office in Chantilly, Virginia, we maintain branch offices in Baltimore, Maryland, Richmond, Fredericksburg and Norfolk, Virginia, Charlotte, Research Triangle. Park, Greensboro, North Carolina, Greenville/Spartanburg, South Carolina, Atlanta, Georgia, Chicago, Illinois and Austin, Texas. We focus our activities on the specific concerns of the Mid -Atlantic development area. By combining the talents from all four offices, we can offer highly qualified personnel to staff each of our projects. Our multi -phase services structure -- including geotechnical engineering, construction materials testing and inspection, and environmental services and engineering -- results in better long-term understanding of individual projects and clients, and allows us to respond quickly to potentially critical situations. ECS, Ltd. has applied this approach on many of the larger projects in this region, including work for such firms as Trammell Crow Company, Prentiss Properties, Homart Development Company, The Oliver Carr Company; and Friendswood Development. -f- ECS; Ltd. is certified loy the Washington Area Council of EnginLaboratories (WACEL . e ), and the Cement and Concrete Laborator,,- ("CCRL), in the area of Construction Testing Se^.'ices. i F"O 1-4 2. ® FIELDS OF COMPETENCE Tlirougr the close working relationship of its operational departments and speciaiized sub -contractors, ECS, Ltd. has the total capabiiip.- =o evaivate a given site or operation and to develop the most practical approach to environmental site assessments, site contamination studies. ground water and soil remediation, permitting, and desi environmental control systems. gn of primary focus has been to continually develop practical and cost-effective solutions in a timely and responsive manner to changing environmental problems. One of the major reasons for our past success in the environmentai consulting marketplace has been our ability to "customize" and combine specific services from. different disciplines to individual client and projecr needs. Also of importance to our clients is our knowledge of the environmental regulatory agencies and our record of success working with them in our clients' interest. The environmental services available from ECS; Ltd. include: ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES: • Real estate transactions/environmental site assessments (Phases r, II, and III) • Environmental impact studies and risk assessments • Wetland delineation and mitigation investigations • Radon investigations • Environmental facility audits and assessments • Third -party reviews ASBESTOS ASSESSMENTS: • Asbestos surveys • Sample collection and analysis • Preparation of plans and specifications UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK MANAGEMENT: • Monitoring of tank removals • Site investigations and assessments • Contaminant plume evaluations • Long- and short-term environmental site monitoring • Development of corrective actions plans (CAP's) • Regulaton! permitting 0 Ground water recovery system design HMROGEOLOGICAL AND GEOPHYSICAL SERVICES: • Development and implementation of ground XaEe: e�,aluation plans • Design and implementation of ground water monitoi-ir_? including drilling and well installation • Ground water modeling • Aquifer testing (pumping tests, slug tests and bail -down =est,:�; • Contaminant plume investigations • Electromagnetic and resistivity surveys • Design of ground water recovery and treatment systems • Seismic refraction and ground -probing radar studies ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING: • Design and implementation of site remediation measures • Preparation of closure plans and other hazardous faciliry per rrit= ;,; • Design of new landfill and lagoon facilities• - Design of pumping and treatment systems for contaminated water - • Design of water/waste water treatment systems • Permitting and regulatory- negotiation fi • Ii 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES ")• �:1C:'GROUND Within the environmental field, ECS, Ltd. has concentrated on provid, services to the regional development and financial community, including commercial, residential, institutional and industrial clients and lenders. By concentrating on this service sector, we are able to better understand the requirements of each group and provide services more speciticall;- tailored to individual needs. For most commercial, residential and institutional developers, the most common_ services performed, to date. have been Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments. In this area, our work includes a thorough evaluation of the physical conditions of the property using visual overviews supported by aerial photographs, an historical search of appropriate information for past historic and regulated uses, and interviews with current or previous tenants to determine previous site activities. Depending upon the results of the Phase I investigation, follow-up Phase II studies, if necessary, are Provided and structured as site -specific conditions dictate and car, include soil -test borings, monitoring well installations and chemicai analyses of soil, ground water and surface water. ECS, Ltd. also provides hydrogeological and geophysical investigations for the municipal, commercial, industrial, development, and financial sectors. These investigations can be sub -divided into two fields: ground water resources studies, and contaminant/delineation ground water monitoring investigations. Ground water resource investigations primarily, concentrate on developing and/or protecting our valuable ground water resources. These types of investigations are commonly requested by municipalities, industries, and developers in need of water for potable, irrigation, or industrial use, particularly in those areas where commercial water supplies are either unavailable, difficult to attain, or economically unfeasible. Existing published data, other consultant reports, and pertinent scientific literature are reviewed and are supplemented by a full-scale field investigation consisting of geological and/or geophysical survevs. The synthesized information is then used to more cost-effectively site future water supply wells and/or enhance old established well fields. Contaminant delineation and ground water monitoring investigations primarily concentrate on determining the magnitude and extent of ground water and soil contamination. Test - borings are drilled, ground water monitoring wells are installed, and the subsurface soils and ground water are sampled and chemically analyzed to determine the c• r• tTpes and concentrations of the various contaminant(s) that ar` potentially present. The number of borings and monitoring ;yells _s de pendent on the estimated extent and nature of the contaminants _n question. Through hydraulic testing and measurements the direction and rate of ground water flov,-, and hence, contaminant migration and dispersion, can be calculated. Geophysical techniques are often used =o supplement the environmental sampling and analyses as a means more effectively locating a contaminant plume. Such tvines of hydrogeological investigations are necessary for determining the potendai impacts from leaking underground storage tanks (UST's), old and :ie=v landfills, surface impoundments, hazardous spills of hazardous chemical materials and wastes, etc. Finally, ECS, Ltd. can comprehensively assess industrial processes _o determine wastewater flows and loads, develop permitting and treatment strategies, perform treatabilinr studies and design wastewater treatment systems. 3.2 REPRESENTATIVE CLIENTS AOKI Corporation Birtcher-Butcher Partnership Boston Properties Buvermo Properties Cafferty Development Carey Winston Company Cambridge Companies Centennial Development Center.Mark Properties Citistate. Inc. CSX Realty Cushman and Wakefield Danac Corporation Development Resources. Inc. Dome Real Estate The Donohoe Company The Evans Company Evergreen Development Federal Real Estate Investment Trust Friendswood Development Gilbane Properties Greenbaum & Rose Homestead Village J&B Enterprises y The JBG Companies KLNB Management Services Lincoln Property Company The Henry A. Long Company `lanekin Corporation The Stanley Martin Companies Mason Hirst Companies Metropolitan Partnership, Ltd. Mobil Land Development National Dev. Mid -Atlantic Office Space Management. Inc. Osprey Investment Company Pence-Freidel Development Prentiss Properties, Ltd. Prudential Realty Grout) The Radnor Corporation Reston Town Center Associates. Inc. The Michael T. Rose Companies B.F. Saul Company Savage -Fogarty Realty Sequoia Building Corporation The Shapiro Companies Simpson Development Compan The Staubach Company The Svatos Company The Taubman Company Trammell Crow Company Turner Harwood Ventures Union Pacific Realty Corporation William H. Dolben & Son. Inc. Winchester Commercial The World Bank Banks and Financial Institutions —6- American Security Bank nlresco Institutional. Inc. t= resiar Bank Eastern American Bank Equitable Real Estate Investment .Mptrit Financial Conservators, Inc. First Union Bank Bank of America Perpetual Bank Potomac Capital Investment Corporation Principal Capital Management. LLC Riggs National Bank Resolution Trust Corporation Security Trust Company, N.A. 3.3 SPECIFICATIONS AND PERSONNEL QUALIFICATIONS Resumes of keN' personnel are attached. GARNETT B. WILLIAMS, C.F.U. Senior Environmental Geologist- 0 i EDUCATION B.S., Geolog•, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia, 1985 CERTIFICATIONS OSHA 40 Hours, 29 CFR 1910.120(e)(2) OSHA Hazardous Materials and Incident Commander (16 hours) BOCA CPCCI IA Exam - National Certification Program for Inspectors Construction Code Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth Universitv - Managing Asbestos in Buildings Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University - Inspecting Buiidir.�s for Asbestos -Containing Material CONTINUING EDUCATION National Water Well Association (NWWA)-Theory & Practice Of Ground Water'Vlonitorinz & Sampling NWWA-Treatment Technology For Contaminated Ground Water NWWA-Environmental Site Assessments Virginia Association Of Professional Soil Scientists (VAPSS)-Non tidal Wetlands Field Study Government Institutes -Wetlands & Real Estate Development National Wetlands Training Institute -Plant Identification Best Management Practices And Wetlands Cook College, Understanding Soil Conditions of Wetlands NGWA, Principles of Ground Water Hydrology. _. PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES Association of Groundwater Scientists and Engineers (AGWSE/NWWA). EXPERIENCE 1989 to Present: Project Environmental Geologist, Engineering Consulting Services. Ltd., Chantilly, Virginia. Responsible for coordination and preparation of Phase I/Phase II emrironmental site assessments; facility audits; geotechnical engineering reports; environmental site characterization studies; coordination and implementation of corrective action plans .and contaminant remediation efforts; wetlands delineation studies and associated environmental permitting, Duties also include surveying with conventional transit/ EDM and GPS instrumentation. t 1985 to 1989: Engineering Geologist, Bengston, DeBell, Elkin and Titus, Inc., Centreville, Virginia. Assistant to the Geotechnical Engineering Group, Duties it- included: preparation of preliminary and final geotechnical reports; coordination of i subsurface drilling and seismic refraction surveys; sanitary drainfield evaluations and infiltration testing; and, Virginia Uniform Building Code (structural and wood framing) inspections for commercial and residential structures under Fairfax County BOCA contract. 1983 to 1985: Exploration Geologist, North American Exploration, Inc., Kaysville, Utah. Responsible for collecting and logging rock and stream sediment samples for targeted anomalous areas in precious and base metals exploration. Performed preliminary field investigations of above areas by various geophysical methods using proton precession magnetometer, gravitometer, reflection seismography, and rock outcrop mapping techniques. Representative sampling of recent key assignments and experience: • Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments (ESAs), environmental safety and liability audits of tenant operations and building facilities for an assortment of commercial/industrial/residential properties involving confidential financial institutions. These studies have included acquisition and foreclosure of properties in Maryland, Virginia, Washington D.C., North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Nebraska, and I Connecticut. Properties included warehouses, strip retail facilities, commercial offices, railyards, industrial facilities and undeveloped tracts. I. o Site characterization, monitoring and remediation of fuel/solvent spills for a prominent railroad company. Sites included railyard fueling/maintenance facilities in Virginia, West Virginia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Washington, D.C. Projects involved: Phase I historical evaluation of events to define areas of potential contamination; installation of monitoring and recovery wells; installation and operation of remediation systems (free product and dissolved phase); and, development of groundwater sampling and monitoring programs. • Engineering and environmental support of omnibus contract to US Army for design, testing and evaluation of a prototypical small arms range facility to reduce lead contamination to surrounding environment. Designed and provided oversight of range construction. Prepared and executed a sampling plan to evaluate the effectiveness of soil fixation technologies in reducing lead leachate from impac UT berm and migration of lead via surface waters. • Sampling, analysis and geochemical modeling of lead in soil at a private shooting range. Data was used to complete a risk characterization to develop cleanup costs for a proposed single family subdivision. • Wetland delineations, functional assessments and permitting of commercial properties in Virginia, Maryland and Pennsylvania. • Phase I environmental services at a renovated tobacco warehouse project. Work _ included lead -based paint survey, PCB analysis of transformers, asbestos ` inspection, UST site characterization and a tenant and mechanical facilities audit. -2- 1 • APPENDIXIV PHOTOGRAPHS t ,, f/r-.•-+',.ie��"s _ r � d _ r ---..dam l'"`a-_._....��_ �-,/ � c. J ;' tY� .— ^ _._ �. -"..� - ' ...._' _ / ! M ' ��`�Y � 1 � - w �S1'.,"'rie. _ ... "'�--•^..:r .- - � n.. - -`-..,,i+r W�'�i �1 ��.�''% ' �. , I ,l�J, u'. �frFp� / ' i r• '',� J HI j'/ / j , / - \ I ! I ,,i!! ;1/(I J('xrS%- ,ii .•' i`Y 7/ ,i ;iIIItJI ',� , V.~tI•"�;r.i1 ,J,JlJ`!- ' �4r I1,t1,\/ 1f, 'i,�•.•\r1., r �,'1rl I1t A - I,,!t /� _, .av- _ \; 1`\/L, )`....,1J i %-I�i ' 11 •1t1' \.�\1J��•.,�•�� \,l,, �u\, m1/5`�\l/`,\\\I`-�, % -t1J,,"'��r i)„i,i.`:l�, I.7t,7i�let�"jIYh�h,��l /rl 4 : ,'7 /.'rr/__am'/i/��.r,'4:rtt:�\ �W`��%`�,�f�.:}.�,t.` �\\\.`.\ '•�,' `4,,,`\;. ,,, :�4,;;.; t_1 -7 /1 -,1 / �.i.I t. . r.r,;'_�r- _,`•\t.,`' \\v..-r,'rJ; r, �..', ♦'`\♦ , 1;1,t1.�1 ,�' 1,irtt I1JtnlI,i1yI.'��l,t 1(F111y1102 ;r! 'Pt ♦b,j,!tI,•�y`•�l.� . �l%Jf%''r%"��o%%;.�r!'`• -••y`t"1^t\\/dt t\ '1t4 \t,\�\'`�.\ ,i , '11'`, .,'��1 \: •, ��•`.. 1 ;% , r r .J—.am....-. • ..\7/ � •'tI' t ,,' \--, -at.��,-^:-. 3. �':`1_�1'i,`,'`\ `,\t.,-;/i�r�' ..• fr' "a-.;. ; •;,_..._ ✓•i-_•.�... ; - , ... _ .l ';�1 + 1 /7- i' .� , � }i�r, r,, 1y ,11 ,,� r •r. !,r -'---- ; �' 7 /�'` l ,, ,\, `\.p� '' ~ll v , �;� _ ) `..- � l i. � .•,.` t ' l y-_• :J � 1 1 ,` !J, _/, r , � 1 � � ,tA/I h, }4 14�4' :r ''j 3.r i ��.-• � ....1 r 7 7• I 1 �,. '', ` `�\. .r�ir♦��,L:;%ir t �, f•' 1 i " - ... 1I'', •'•{'ram- `•\ ':```•�' _�:' 1 % � - i' � I I Irrl ,�./l�ltl .l �ii �:i , t��\'',,y /, ,, - - ' ', y ' ` ✓A J � r / y / 1 1 �Ill�• ,Lr r• r' /H ry rri - ,, \\ �^j-_ `'`V., r. I trl /• j -Cr /••._r'- , `'. ` �:��=�`- _.,_ `_=," . Jrf _ :r`;;.117f,,,,,f,�,,rlI;;1;�� ti/t„a,;r; •�'� ,� _ :;�;. Y�____�-- ;; _ _� r /- x1_ - -_, ;, r�h) ql l 11 'a � { � rr ,' 7 � ••'\ ' : i i t�, � ^+� ' ` r 3�C -- +�a - , 11, 1 ' 1 t i i i ` _ �..•/ ' / �',. / p,ltt a\,a•. \ 1 i i' ! L 1 _ I 1 t �(['! , ttl 1 1 �_ r r' 7 / 1 - � %r~ /r:� y yr / \,\�_� C'� \, f ' �� r �� ...-_ /7� r` 1 r•. �__� i i ♦ \x, •1_ ,':•F. �•�: •)i i � � l \ 1 / / � % � ;' j ; _. r} '/ _ �y!i7�'" r,., '� ' +�y , 1\1�♦`\�`t `t ••\ ,t � / 1. r'f'`` __ _., M r ,. � `..._. _. _... � k , ,t ., ;\ \\ \♦-,! _. -�":� I 1 (` , , \ \ 1', .1 ; 1 ' , ' : (^ �'� rrz" „Y ''"--`4�+•`♦fit` Y'r sl Z \.� t \ i ``� __ - A ✓ \ ,' �', �.-..:;;.�. '-?'£ ` :.11,i 1t�':� t ` � �,. %r 1 � � tt / �'��11'if '' ='�-��"--:'',IPt ��'d���,��♦'` ...- . \ i i i� _� 1 �� _. � .__....- `t `\t\ � �a a, _` ,�__ ,_� � _ ``1 t ! ! '1 1 \- / . ' J l • \ •�-, '1 r� � /., 7 / '.'i '. 6 - � yi~ _ `..`\t• ` { / 1 I 1 � � `- �� `•1 i, + ` 1\' .. .._ •,\ _ \\t 1 t \ ./. J �t "t��- ;, 11�11 '- I r/i� - � _� 1 `'„ ',�• ' i 1 `,` _ • ( ` _ , „ ! / j r ,' 1 1 � f'�;: iJ Jr 1. J.$- `_._ 1 t ' -'r•_ ; �'_.r • 1 , t `- ' I r.. ..� ^ .. 1 r '•,•` � 2 � . t.. r- �-. \�:�`�S � ` J tr i _ J } �, .., � .�f' �-'_` ,krl t� i.` - • J_ / t t +........`` , i 7 1 J ,_ i' ,... ^ ._- -1`,' , , 4„'��_. r `, `. ` .j't• � � 1 I % ,' ,' / 1 , , I r !� '� • =.-=• ,y1 `..A S'%'r ` � I r�', (l !_.,.,�- ` r ` , � , tt 1 t '\ 1 ( , + � •� �`Qi `., • _ ,; \�`tj'-til � ;, { t. , , i , t �_ i' Jl `Af 1, i„ r�j,^. is '•�....... \ `,ll. \ r�'y �- •••., A ! ., t t 1 _-. 'r ` •, �.,\ � 7 �� t ` I ; 1. I r... `111 t1 � i i !r ,,, 1 � � ,'.� "A �'�4�� � rJrrr T --'"\ t � tilt + �/ , � _•- .. _ `��": �' % -�``\.`^ r � l t` � t'.__''/'~ ` 1 , -rI/ ; ram, i� � `, � ,t '_. _ ,_,i• � 1 1', �'"v _�•.`i `;lit'\i !. `�. �. 1 : \ 1 1 , r , r,,„ ..x �!; .:j � ��11 i'�tl (Sr� r % ��` ' '� ,i, r /- `' �._- -- ? `' �, �. %i r ,r••• `j i \`lt '- 1 i + ` , t \ 1, 1117 '.i\, i �J \ \ � t I f' ( .' i Jam.' Ir , • i ��. `,' �- ..,. t t 1 ' • , I h I ;•', _ 7 J 1 •• 1 I , 1 �I7., r rr,.-- t�,`��s�%i'i,r.._._ 1 7� I / --______ + 11; ii� , J� 1 r .\•, , y � 1 II;,�J,',I �� /-^ ,. :�; ; t, ; , I l \ ; I ; , ,/;:; `�.- �„ - , ,1+1- ,,, -�,. , , ; _ _ -' �,/;% 1 � 1 1 l r , _,:,` :' ti_, \, ' �• / r ' 1 _' 1J JI illi a:,� ``., ! I r.• , 1 1, (, rn J J .:A i IYsTS%�.--^' : -, /+ r J �/`� - -__- 1 r J , J • \t . ` I r \; \' _ , .ter 7 `,•. � / ,�, ,.% � i"� r 1 r ! , , r,! i _ ., _ 1 , , ` •• ` "% J�7 7 f , , 7 1 Ji"�5�:... ' , `t rr ,•` 1 1 ' �,���ZI�--- 1 �,,;+tt ; 1,1. 1 r •" ` � . • •': I r 1 i� � ,�� � •`♦�� ':\ 1 \ •� , r l +�1t� 1111 ,1, 1 It � A' r " x-tK-.^"'. 1 I 1 l \\ \ I l,1 I � j 1•\ `I 1 ! l �11t1 1 � J ,' i , . _ t /-.c,a_•__...., i ., 'y`.,• ••��.` \ , a :. , , 1 1 r . , `"i-�r1 1 , r J ' i '\ 1 , i In 1 di rtt ;`. l+li 1\�r rl i /� r �•-.:. -._^• .. _ �` 1 :� I1II •\�`t,{` 1 `\ , r�"�,•• ""'' 'I i i _ / t , -_ ..�`` \ i,?/ % f �� i 1 ' �, ' 1�1i J� i I i 1 �•I ,•�p�}Il i \` \ , .t I • • /'' -�' 1 1 \ i ~' 1 \ ',, '♦ , `jll �I /�� r J 1 \,`` ``\1 `•\ i 'V 1 ! r' '} 1 , r \`11' ` ,1 it , . (•_. C � ._� 1 r 1 I ,"/'-� `•_"-''� '� r� % � r I\ �r'nr!.. 7'' : ~~ -" / i ? t jll lJ N �l, ; 1 I t t+ t1 t1 /, l , , 1 1 ��i ".t ` �' f..... ,` ,1 •1 i �17"�i/r/, /•,/' / 7 ,/a�/! 111,, 1 !" `• t1+. �i �.I, \�� t .... ...�... /' �_� ' "� 11 � \1 \ /;' - r•... 1 1 I /1, I,r�r r! ,\\ 1•.a ,\, �` �; 1 ..-.. _ _' r/ /,A%I/,fit 11\` /i'r` _ ._. • l .1 ;/%/�7/)/�I, 11111;� 1 \...-,'+!/� I` ,�J 1\•`+.\11\, 1\`1t\, '\,11��1 , .'`; .' •�tt)A_ � ' \ ,•_ ~ ' %' l � l/ .i`,;\ -' �... .�_'-^ ..^ _•�-.\\\ `..•, I r //./ rP ,411, - � r.. 11 ,1,t ,,1\'t\, \ •'' /'! %�yy ,`• ! ~ , , , ,, r )i i ' , / ,i ,t r ',, , , , , /� �.` ! J I ,/ Y ihl IJ1 r •'•,` , I t ,,,, i�},'\, 5 �. ! t \mil \� % � i� r� � ( rl '-- -.... ,I 1 ;<\ 1:,/ \,.-,' I t ` r-� /,...`�..^ ` •\ ' ' 1jrJ �' ,: JJ 1 `- ,.... �, , t �,lt ,`,\";•.� "'� ; r � 1 1�1, `\\,._. 1 ji •'ri' ` I `, !1 / '- A; !,' j', � -_ % \ `,t\I{1 J\\C,."_ "; j 1 1'�`�.•r!• _.. _.�.'•, \`. ''\ rr i Ilil,ltl:1.[s yl'�i':1 L_'� ! tt __ � • �.i�l-1,\':at��`��'-.- 7 Il,l�h'` -_% 1� % :/!_..,`\ •`� � _ '-.-.. ! � �„'Il ,♦\.; \... /1`11/`\\%I•__-•. It,l \1`.._� t Jlil,,lfl j�_h�,`1\\~�'-_ _ i i i ` NF 1�, a`\ rl l•111 aP\�\.._ JI i 1 ,.l A- I /•-'_t1 t 1` +rh 1* „� �.t Il! 1• Mt` ', `♦ 1�_. s �/• ," , 1111 1 \, �, ,11 J`.�•'I '15\, .../' �11111111 �\�'``,..:^ ���. -�' 1 1 /- - `i\Ird♦•`�. �._..�.. J ) •\,t, ,,_.♦ 1 ., I j ! _ - ,•" / `�- 1''.t, ,i / r 1 � / \•. \\ J f Ill tt,l. \t,\ 1 � r l ! . p0 \v t\\� �. r 1 Ili,' \•,,. _...__.� r 1. - ';- ` 1 ; ;,' '; `•. ! ... ,11\',1 `•` •)�fl •\�- 1+�,\ J 1 ,, ll, .`,�11'_.�--^; 1 1 1 1ra t t\ `, t♦.♦ `"'•• _r , 1 - .\� ... �`, •a `� J // 1 �\•..�' '/ rr � '•'\ '_" i I) ugF[,,t4YCIrt` ,� \ \ I , , t t !1 "``�-: ,\,� + ,J\` \ `� _ � li� ���'-.....t � '•, ? \,u ' ( � i--'•- r,r/ , i ,~ I ,.r 7 J J �' �- �i...•frj �`'•^"• 1,lurl"'J1�♦",i,' i ! /i i 1 I t t i t � , \,\\�l�w`'��,�':\.�,.- .� , .1 .- __. • - \ 1 i t r A' ••`: �- .:... --�.. �, I `• l!' - �_`:. _ - /• II i 11 r \ „�., t 1 t i . \. td� \ \;•.,` , ,., _. , v��_. -._'-r'i-.y_,,•t 1• f'f •�. ,i�,. _ ;.�,.•." / `,_ti:- ti\y. _ q liM'4�•, 1 IJ,r/�' i',i 1 i•1 i t 1 11i' _ Ii`,p` ��,.',��� __. ._ ,,1 •i:.\�-- •\ 1 , , 'P .S !I , i� •'Jj - 'l' - •, try I! J/11 r t t t \ t __�\p\\a _ - - - _ ,i >.• t 1 i •.r , '{ t i • .., t r',.\�. %. !y� .:i• � �:.i- ^'> .-' �i.> lill 1. � r � � 1 , , ! 1 J ,i r / .+:fir `.:. � �•- '-'' _.``�. T j \ 51t -t.� r,1,2 _'.�:' lttl f 'iv,`• ' t / , - r- - --'� .�--•--1 :..; '_ �\'--- riik I . f N11 1.0 - - `\� ,_� 11 I 11 •,\ •, i '''•:a•, -"+t., ,z- ., a,.. 1 '♦ / 1 ' �_ � __� _ �� �'�'\•\ - J, / it 1 . 1 ^.j tS�. J^^.� (.. s �� l 'r� ... _._.... _.. �,\ , y::: = ,. `'C•- p' l ` �\ { �. t` 't,' r` ..,"�'_ � �.�tt �j, .>rG:gX' ^'�': \ t �'_�. r� ��`�/!-\ J _ .. Y-_. _. _.. `ly '\••' jt. \,.\. :it + `�\1•+.♦'- .\'.�\\\ '1 ♦, 1 i i 1 I�If Ai'14�11 -- r h'I.y JI � -/ i 1 ,., _ ---' _. ... _. "� _ t ,t i r _. `\t\�•�\t�11 1\I `\1t'•�' \ •t .\_ --• ,� r�rr ���n rye: �' , �/ .q ,j ,, t •' , t ,, -' ,.:' '.. `'---.--.. �`•....•. -JAr. \•., _. .. ,-. ., •._.- `\ �111. •I,\', �t`,\ t:•�.1; - - �~i' A.i �Jr, fvy�t,�_- ��':.-. r -, p:: t rl _ .. ._ _ _ 1 �__\ ,t 11+. 1,•r '`\,` \`.. \ I !`i;=:Y7;. ,`t '!'' ''�•,•/.'i�' `\.lx i' \, +,1 . ', ...- / • +,\ '\\ 11�;\``\ \ \�.\ \ , i , 4, \1• 1 „% r/I/,rr rr': / \\\��;` \l.• , � ••�.�\ t.t•`\ , , 1 1 hi 'r i D•Qi• i•. �. \ 1 /-�•'. - -.--1 .rJ• , .1 \\. \,.-\ ,e\\,S e ., •.. i' o1; I /- \ �_ '/,.. _ - _` •_._• J... t: Jl �` I �\ tr.+\`L .s >/, _ , -._.. J 1 t 1,1 �\A•\` �l.r!l� ••� J ' '% ''`' , , '.,...' ... i.t �••�,>(/ 5..�7���•• - 1•tt( �•f -'--i `"'t '11::��?t'.:, •%': ... ; 11 +.,i"i\M.°, _....... - - .)',\'.' _ •'/, ..j', I1'1`�„ tv •M \,\,, `f ;,: //l - •. . 1.. .` , ,..- ... • \.. ', "� t -''-•- :�:: t •, /! r ' ../' , 1 ,f \.ems :. 1,. : i. %:I ,_ , -.. � ♦ l ,. _ - ," it t , • /� r , _ . %, 11'"•�T•• " ._ - It,l !Pt`111 a -- „u r � ... /� //f. ,: rA j J/ 441 Photograph Location and Number ECS LTD - PHASE I ESA ARTRIP PROPERTY ENGINEEFING CONSULTING Dewberry, LLC � � fj� i ja5a s; r +F �'„ _ �i'�..�r 4} `�tF" �, @ � ���� =..� ��i����•'!%,:P --•!styes I :�-+�- Fsr�g� ►: y, �ftsjvsazye deq�� F' A� WSW -tr,- - em Mkt` 7 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) 10 oject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RIC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes ❑ No Community ID PEM Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? ❑ Yes. ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No I Plot ID DP 11 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex frankii H OBL !, Carex crinita H OBL Ludwigia alata H OBI:. Juncus effusus H FACW+ Agrostis alba H FACW i 'ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydrophytic plant species. la HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS ❑ Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge Primary Indicators: ® Aerial Photographs ® Inundated ❑ Other ❑ Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ No Recorded Data Available ❑ Drift Lines FIELD OBSERVATIONS El Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands Depth of Surface Water 1.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water -Stained Leaves Depth to Free Water in Pit 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) epth to Saturated Soil r 0.0 (in) i'tber (explain): Wetland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/remarks: ❑ No indicators of wetland hydrology. ® Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY SOILS Community ID: PEM Plot ID: DP 11 Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained xonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑ YES ® NO Depth Horizon inches PROFILE DESCRIPTION Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, (Munsell Moist) (Munsell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-3 A 10YR 3/2 - - LOAM 3-18 . B 1OYR 4/1 - - CLAY LOAM HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ® Gleyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) -----'ydric soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ® Chroma of 1 with or without mottles' Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ®YES ❑ NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ❑ No Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks: JDATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION 0 Page 2 DATA FORM ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION (1987 COE Wetlands Delineation Manual) 0 oject/Site ARTRIP PROPERTY Date 04/15/04 Applicant / Owner Mr. Charles Segerman, P.E., Artrip Limited Partnership County FREDERICK Investigator JPF + RTC State VA Do Normal Circumstances exist on the site? ® Yes [:]No Community ID PFO Is the site significantly disturbed (Atypical Situation)? [—]Yes ® No Transect ID Is the area a potential Problem Area? (If needed, explain on reverse) ❑ Yes ® No Plot ID DP 12 Explanation of atypical or problem area: VEGETATION Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Dominant Plant Species Stratum Indicator Carex frankii H OBL Fraxinus pennsylvanica T FACW Platanus occidentalis T FACW- = ercent of Dominant Species that are OBL, FACW, or FAC (excluding FAC-): 100% Hydrophytic vegetation present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/Remarks: ❑ Less than 50% dominance offhydrophytic plant species. ® Greater than 50% dominance of hydiophytic plant species. HYDROLOGY ❑Recorded Data (Describe in Remarks) ❑.Stream, Lake, or Tide Gauge ® Aerial Photographs ❑ Other No Recorded Data Available FIELD OBSERVATIONS Depth of Surface Water ' �4 � Depth to Free Water in Pit to Saturated Soil WETLAND HYDROLOGY INDICATORS Primary Indicators: ® Inundated ® Saturated in Upper 12 Inches ❑ Water Marks ❑ Drift Lines ❑ Sediment Deposits ® Drainage Patterns in Wetlands 2.0 (in) Secondary Indicators (2 or more Required): ❑ Oxidized Root Channels in Upper 12 Inches ® Water -Stained Leaves 0.0 (in) ❑ Local Soil Survey Data ❑ FAC-Neutral Test 0.0 (in) ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) Wetland hydrology present? ® Yes ❑ No Rationale for decision/remarks: ❑ No indicators of wetland hydrology. ® Sufficient evidence of wetland hydrology. Project Name: ARTRIP PROPERTY Community ID: PEO Plot ID: DP 12 SOILS 7 Map Unit Name (Series and Phase): Weikert Berks Channery Silt Loam Drainage Class: well drained xonomy (Subgroup): Field Observations Confirm Mapped Type? ❑ YES ® NO PROFILE DESCRIPTION Depth Matrix Color Mottle Colors Mottle Texture, Concretions, inches Horizon i ) (Mansell Moist) Mansell Moist) Abundance/Contrast Structure, etc. 0-12 B IOYR 4/1 1 OYR 5/6 15% SILT LOAM i HYDRIC SOIL INDICATORS: ❑ Histosol ❑ Concretions ❑ Histic Epipedon ❑ High Organic Content in Surface Layer in Sandy Soils ❑ Sulfidic Odor ❑ Organic Streaking in Sandy Soils ❑ Aquic Moisture Regime ❑ Listed on Local Hydric Soils List ❑ Reducing Conditions ❑ Listed on National Hydric Soils List ❑ leyed or Low-Chroma Colors ❑ Other (Explain in Remarks) :ydrie soils present? Rationale for decision/Remarks: ® Yes ❑ No ❑ Chroma of 2 or greater without mottles. ❑ Chroma of 2 with mottles ❑ Chroma greater than 2 with mottles. ® Chroma of 1 with or without mottles Remarks: WETLAND DETERMINATION Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? ® Yes ❑ No Is this Sampling Point Within a Wetland? ® YES ❑ NO Wetland Hydrology Present? ® Yes ❑ No Hydric Soils Present? ® Yes ❑ No Remarks: DATA FORM — ROUTINE WETLAND DETERMINATION • Page 2 1 10 PHOTO LOG • 1 t �4A NA Ito" -N w "Oki, 4 � t4ll try ;Z&d INI. M- I Mz- r1r, - mmo- !17, --%4, 31, The Villages at Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • APPENDIX C PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT C� C, I -� PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT WINCHESTER ARTRIP LP FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA ECS, LTD. PROJECT NO.8232 FOR THE TOWER COMPANIES MARCH 23, 2004 I-0 ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES, LTD. Geotechnical �, Construction Materials o Environmental March 23, 2004 Mr. Stuart Margulies The Tower Companies 11501 Huff Court North Bethesda, Maryland 20895 ECS Project No. 8232 Reference: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winchester Artrip LP .Property Frederick County, Virginia. Dear Mr. Margulies: Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS, Ltd.) is pleased to provide you with the results of our Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the referenced property. Our services were provided in general .accordance with ECS, Ltd. Proposal No. 15786-EP and meet the requirements of ASTM E 1527-00, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. If there are questions regarding this report, or a need for further information, please contact us at 540-667-3750. Respectfully submitted, ENGINEERING CONS LTING SERVICES, Ltd. Garnett B. Williams, C.P.G. Senior Environmental Geologist (GB W/environ/rpt/8232) I• Stuart B. May e P.E. Senior Projec ngineer v......_.....,..........,... _... ....... ....._.......,...-.....--..,..•.......,..........,................._.,_..._...... .... .......... ..,_.,.,......._....._._..._... _.._•..,. - ...._...,_ .... M,......... ,..._. _ 166 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, Virginia 22602 v (540) 667-3750, FAX (540) 667-3730 Aberdeen, MD* • Atlanta, GA • Austin, TX • Baltimore, MD • Chantilly, VA • Charlotte, NC • Chicago, IL • Cornelia, GA* • Dallas, TX • Danville, VA* • Frederick, MD • Fredericksburg, VA Greensboro, NC • Greenville, SC • Norfolk, VA • Research Triangle Park, NC • Richmond, VA • Roanoke, VA • San Antonio, TX • Williamsburg, VA • Wilmington, NC • Winchester, VA *Testing Services Only I� PROJECT CLIENT SUBMITTED BY I� REPORT Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Winchester Artrip LP Property Frederick County, Virginia The Tower Companies 11501 Huff Court North Bethesda, Maryland 20895 Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. 166 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 PROJECT 8232 DATE. March 22, 2004 LL� - PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT WINCHESTER ARTRIP LP PROPERTY FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA ECS PROJECT NO. 8232 TABLE OF CONTENTS _i SECTION PAGE 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.1 Scope of Work 2 2.2 Objectives 2.3 Limitations 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 4 3.1 Site Location 4 3.2 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology 4 4.0 PREVIOUS WORK 6 5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW 7 5.1 Records Review 7 5.2 Regulatory Summary g 6.0 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 10 6.1 On -Site Features 10 6.2 Nearby Properties 11 7.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION 13 7.1 Title Information 13 7.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map and City Directory Review 13 7.3 Aerial Photograph and Topographic Map Review 14 7.4 Local Sources 14 7.5 Interviews and FOIA Requests 14 8.0 OTHER SERVICES 15 9.0 CONCLUSIONS 16 10.0 REFERENCES 17 Table of Contents Page 2 i APPENDIX I II III IV C Figure Regulatory Database Report Statement of Qualifications Photographs i 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS, Ltd.) was contracted by The Tower Companies to perfonn an ASTM Standard E-1527-00, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on a 169.01 acre unimproved tract called the Winchester Artrip LP Property located approximately 1 mile east of Interstate 81 and 2.5 miles north of Stephens City, Virginia. To summarize, available historical documents, regulatory records and conversations with persons having knowledge of the property revealed no evidence of current or previous uses or conditions onsite that would be regarded as environmentally -suspect. Further, a reconnaissance of the site did not reveal the presence of: pipelines; drums; storage, leaks or spills of hazardous substances, petroleum or chemicals; buried or above ground tanks; industrial or manufacturing activities; surface or ground water contamination; distressed vegetation or stained soil; chemical smells or emissions; environmental wells or remedial activities; high voltage electrical easements; farm waste concerns; buried waste; asbestos waste; leachate or seeps; PCB -containing equipment; mining activities; or, similar. environmentally deleterious features or conditions. In view of our findings, ' no further environmental investigation of the property is deemed necessary prior to development. " In closing, we note that this ESA was performed in general accordance with ECS, Ltd. Proposal No. 15786-EP and the requirements of ASTM E 1527-00, Standard Practice. for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. ' Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 2 of this report. This Executive Summary is an integral part of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report. ECS recommends that the report be read in its entirety. i�• ECS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 -2- • 2.1 Scope of Work 2.0 INTRODUCTION Engineering Consulting Services, Ltd. (ECS, Ltd.) was contracted by The Tower Companies to perform an ASTM Standard E-1527-00, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) on a 169.01 acre unimproved tract called the Artrip Property located approximately 1 mile east of Interstate 81 and 2.5 miles north of Stephens City, Virginia. The environmental assessment was conducted in substantial accordance with ASTM Standard E-1527-00. The purpose of the ESA was to identify recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject site, hereafter referred to as "subject", "site", "property" or "tract". 2.2 Obiectives The objectives of the ESA were to: • evaluate the probability of impact of the surface water, ' groundwater and/or soils within the property boundaries through a review of regulatory information and a .reconnaissance of the subject and vicinity; • evaluate historical conditions to identify previous usage that could impact on the environmental condition of the site; • determine, if contamination is believed to have occurred, the potential on -site and off. - site source material(s), location(s) and activities; and, • provide an evaluation of the potential for environmental impact at the site and a list of specific conclusions and recommendations. 2.3 Limitations The ESA involved a reconnaissance of the site and contiguous properties and a review of regulatory and historical information in general accordance with the ASTM standard. No non -scope considerations or additional issues, such as asbestos surveys, radon testing or wetland delineation were investigated, unless otherwise described in Section 8.0 of this report. The conclusions and/or recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonable level of investigation within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site.in this particular geographic and geologic setting. The intent of this assessment is to identify the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the site; however, no environmental site assessment can completely eliminate uncertainty regarding the potential for recognized environmental conditions in connection with the site. The findings of this ESA are not intended to serve as an audit for health and safety or regulatory compliance issues pertaining to improvements or activities at the site. ECS, Ltd. is not liable ECS Project No. 8232 _ 3 March 23, 2004 W r� for the discovery or elimination of hazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents or injury. All observations, conclusions and/or recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken. It was not the purpose of this study to determine the actual presence, degree or extent of contamination, if any, at this site. This could require additional exploratory work, including sampling and laboratory analysis. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusions and/or recommendations presented within this report. ASTM E-1527-00 defines a "recognized environmental. condition" as: "the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate 'an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes. hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws.'' The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a rnateriaF risk of harm to public health or the environment and that would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies." This report is provided, for the exclusive use of The Tower Companies and their partners, assigns or clients involved with the acquisition and development of the subject. This ESA should not be used or relied. upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties. The use of this report by any undesignated third party or parties will be at such parry's sole risk and ECS, Ltd. disclaims liability for any such third party use or reliance. CCS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 -4- � -0 1 L 3.1 Site Location 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION The site is located approximately 1 mile east of Interstate 81 and 2.5 miles north of Stephens City, Virginia. (Figure 1). The tract is further described as the former southwestern 169.01- acre portion of the.A trip Farm as indicated on tax map number 75-A-99A. The property is bounded to the north by the Opequon Creek with the remainder of the Artrip farm beyond; to the east by the Artrip Farm with U.S. Route 522 beyond; to the south by the Lakeside subdivision and a Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) easement and sewage lagoons; and to the west by undeveloped wooded land with residential properties beyond. Adjacent properties are discussed.in more detail in Section 6.2. 3.2 Physical Setting and Hydrogeology The property is situated at a maximum elevation of about 730 MSL with gently sloping hills in the southwestern portion of the site. The central portions of the site tend to slope slightly to moderately towards the lower lying regions while the northern portion of the site slopes very steeply. towards Opequon Creek. In this setting, the residential properties to the southwest are generally cross gradient of the site with the remainder of the site being up gradient of adjoining properties. Runoff from the northern half of the site flows directly into Opequon Creek while in the southern half of the site runoff flows toward an unnamed tributary of Opequon Creek. Based on regional topographic mapping and our site reconnaissance we have identified that there are intermittent creek beds in the drainage ways of the site, a spring located in the northwestern corner of the site, flood plains mapped along Opequon Creek and a centrally located pond. According to the Geologic Map of the Virginia Portion of the Winchester 30x6o Quadrangle, (Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy; Division of Mineral Resources, 2001), the property. is underlain by the Martinsburg Formation. The Martinsburg Formation consists of. upper 100 to 200 feet brown, medium - to coarse -grained sandstone, may be fossiliferous. Middle 3000 to 4500 feet: olive-green, silty shale, dark -gray siltstone, and medium- to coarse -grained sandstone, locally contains pebbles. Lower 400 to 900 feet: Stickley Run Member (Epstein and others, 1995), medium - gray to grayish -black, very -fine-grained, very -thin- to thin -bedded, argillaceous limestone with interbedded medium- to dark -gray calcareous shale. Thickness ranges from an estimated maximum of 5200 feet in the Massanutten Synclinorium to about 2000 feet in the western outcrop areas. According to the Soil Survey. of Frederick County, Virginia (USDA-SCS, 1987), soils found within the subject site include the Berks channery silt loams in the higher elevations, Clearbrook channery silt loam in the moderately sloping wooded southeastern portion of the site, and the Weikert-Berks channery silt loams in the on -site drainage ways and steeply ECS Project No. 8232 _ 5 _ March 23, 2004 sloped areas. These soils are described as varying from poorly to well -drained with bedrock being found at a depth of 27 to 30 inches. The major development limitation in these soil types is related to shallow bedrock. In this geologic terrain a shallow water table usually develops near the saprolite (i.e., weathered rock) and fresh. bedrock contact at depths of 15 to 25 feet. Groundwater tends to flow laterally along the soil/rock interface, generally mimicking topography. Usually a persistent water table occurs only in low-lying areas and adjacent to creeks; otherwise, it is related to rainfall and thus only transient in occurrence. Impervious layers combined with highly permeable fracture zones can distort seepage patterns; consequently, only the lower limits of the saprolite remain saturated for extended periods. • ECS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 -6- 4.0 PREVIOUS WORK ECS was not provided with previous environmental, engineering or similar studies on the subject at the time this report was completed. Additionally, we have not performed prior environmental investigations of the subject. We have, however, performed ESA's on several properties in close proximity and no environmentally remarkable conditions or activities were discovered during the course of those assessments. ECS Project No, 8232 March 23, 2004 -7- 5.1 Records Review 5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW Public records were reviewed to identify evidence of past or present activities on or near the site which may have resulted in soil, surface water and/or ground water contamination or the generation, use, storage or disposal of hazardous waste, chemical or petroleum products/materials. This information was obtained from EnviroData. The EnviroData report is based on an ASTM standard radius search centered on the geographic coordinates of the site and includes the following databases: Superfund National Priority List (NPL): The "Superfund" NPL List is a compilation of properties considered by the EPA as being either uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites that require priority consideration for remedial action under the Federal Superfund Program. These sites are considered to pose a significant risk of stigmatizing surrounding properties and potentially impacting property values. State Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA/CERCLIS) LIST: CERCLIS sites are those that �� • the EPA has investigated or is currently investigating for a release or threatened release of a hazardous substance pursuant to the 1980 CERCLA Act. The Commonwealth of Virginia does not have a formal State Superfund Program; therefore, the federal CERCLIS database is considered to be the equivalent of a State Hazardous Waste Sites List. Resource Conservation Recovery Act (RCRA-TS, -LG and -SG): RCRA regulations apply to facilities that the EPA designates as storing, transporting, generating, treating or disposing of hazardous waste. RCRA facilities include large quantity generators and small quantity generators: Non -compliant RCRA sites, RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System (RAATS) and treatment storage and disposal (TSD) sites are also monitored under this program. The RCRA Corrective Action Sites (CORRACTS) list contains information about TSD facilities that have performed remediation due to a release of hazardous waste or due to a violation of RCRA. Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS): contains information on releases of oil and hazardous substances. Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LPSTs/LUSTs): contains summary information pertaining to reported leaking underground storage tanks. The information contained in this database is a combination of LUST lists maintained at the State Department of Environmental Quality Offices. ECS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 �� C• ® Above Ground/Under round Storage Tanks g g (ASTs/USTs): a comprehensive list of all registered active and inactive underground storage tanks (USTs) located within the Cornmonwealth of Virginia. • Solid Waste Facilities (SWF): Under Subtitle D of RCRA, the EPA establishes technical standards for the operation of solid waste management facilities (transfer stations and landfills). No Further Remediation Action Planned Sites (NFRAP): also known as the CERCLIS archive, contains information pertaining to sites that have been removed from the CERCLIS database. NFRAP sites may be sites where, following an initial investigation, either no contamination was found, contamination was removed quickly without need for the site to be placed on the NPL, or the contamination was not serious enough to require Superfund action or NPL consideration. • The Voluntary Remediation Program (VRP) lists properties that are either undergoing or have completed voluntary remediation overseen by the VDEQ. The VDEQ maintains a pollution response or PREP database to track surface spills of oil and hazardous substances. Some of the listings identified as "unmapped sites" are not plotted due to inadequate address and geocoding information. ECS reviewed and field -checked the list of "unmapped sites" to verify their location and possible impact to the subject. Finally, ECS reviewed the Pollution Complaint ("PC ")'database pertaining to LPSTs at the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VDEQ) offices. "PC" incidents can include surface spills; LRSTs and other environmental releases that may be responded to by the local Fire Department or VDEQ. S.2 Regulatory Summary There are no regulatory listings that apply to the property under consideration. No sites within the ASTM-designated search radii were identified on the NPL, CORRACTS, RCRA (TSD), RCRIS generators, CERCLIS/NFRAP, ERNS, VRP or PREP notices. No RSTs or LRSTs were identified on the current listing for contiguous or nearby properties. Three ASTs were observed on the southern adjoining FCSA property; however, this property is well down slope so it is not deemed to be a potential threat. Given the age of the surrounding community, it is likely that some nearby older homes and farms may have heating oil ASTs or USTs that do not appear on State databases. No home heating oil tanks, however, were observed in close proximity. ECS Project No, 8232 March 23, 2004 -9- Finally, based on our review of "Unmapped Sites" there are no other listings within the ASTM-specified search radii. I• ECS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 I 6.0 FIELD RECONNAISSANCE 6.1 On -Site Features Stuart Mayberry (ECS, Ltd.) conducted the field reconnaissance on March 18, 2004. Weather at the time was generally cool and cloudy. The reconnaissance was performed to search for evidence of: hazardous waste/material, chemical and/or petroleum storage, leak or spill; stressed vegetation or soil discoloration; drinking water/environmental monitoring wells; environmental remediation activities; storage drums; industrial or commercial refuse; herbicide or pesticide containers; faun waste; septic systems; above -ground storage tanks (ASTs); underground storage tanks (USTs); pipelines; asbestos containing material (ACM); industrial/manufacturing or similar environmentally -sensitive operations or conditions; rail spurs; ruins; landfills or illicit dumping; air emissions/waste. water discharge; wetlands or jurisdictional Waters of the US; leachate or seeps; surface or ground water contamination; and/or PCB -containing articles. A site plan illustrating property features is presented as Figure 1. The following narrative is a description of the property: . Access to the site is very limited due to the adjoining Opequon Creek and Artrip farm. Also, there is no roadway access from the southern Lakeside subdivision. The entire site is surrounded by a barbed-wire fence; however, this fence is currently in dilapidated condition With numerous openings in it. Property boundaries and lines were identified from a site plan prepared by Dewberry, LLC. The site encompasses 169.01-acres of land which was formerly the southwestern portion of the Artrip farm. The majority. of the site is comprised of moderately sloping hills covered with grass and widely.spaced cedar trees. Areas containing steeper slopes are forested with hardwood trees. There are currently no structures or utilities located on the site. A former dwelling area is located in the northwestern portion of the site. The former dwelling is no longer present; however, a hand -.dug well associated with it was found. Based on an interview with Mr. Frank Artrip, there is a private cemetery on -site which contains approximately three graves identified with small weathered limestone markers. This cemetery was not located during our site visit; however, it was marked during the boundary survey by Dewberry. The best access to the site is through the FCSA easement located to the southeast of the property. The site contains a centrally located pond which is mapped as wetlands. In addition, we have identified that there are intermittent creek beds in the drainage ways of the site, a spring located in the northwestern corner of the site, and flood plains mapped along the Opequon Creek. No petroleum sheen or unusual discoloration/odor was apparent in the exposed soil or areas of standing water or flowing. No electrical transformers or similar potential PCB -containing equipment is located on the site. No liquid petroleum pipelines or overhead high -voltage electric lines were marked or observed on or near the site. No other buried utilities were observed or marked on the premises. ECS Project No. 8232- March 23, 2004 �J I 1- • Small piles of tires were located throughout the site. An empty 55-gallon drum, apparently used as a burn barrel, was located on the dam of the pond. Also a small dumping area was identified in the northeastern portion of the property. It is our opinion that the tires, burn barrel and dumping area, which contains an automobile body, household rubbish, and waste associated with farm activities, does not constitute a "recognized environmental condition" at this time. However, the tire piles and dumping area should be cleaned up and the contents of them disposed of in an environmentally sound manner. If, during the cleanup of the dump area, a "recognized environmental condition" is encountered that was not apparent during our site visit, the environmental condition should be treated or cleaned up in an environmentally sound manner also. Vegetation, exposed soil and ground cover on -site appeared to be generally healthy and free of obvious staining, odor or similar signs of potential environmental degradation. No other remarkable or unusual features or uses of the site were apparent. Based on our observations, the following conditions or materials were not observed on -site: • Drums or smaller containers for hazardous or chemical substances; • USTs or ASTs; • hazwaste transportation, storage or disposal; • buried waste disposal areas; • chemical/petroleum smells, foul odors or distressed vegetation; • chemical/petroleum stains on soil or other surfaces; • ground water or surface water contamination; • oil or chemical pipelines and related bulk storage facilities; • surface impoundments or holding ponds for liquid waste; • monitoring wells, injection wells or rernediation systems; • septic systems; • asbestos waste; • incinerators, recycling or waste treatment processes; • junk or scrap yards; • industrial or manufacturing activities; • motor vehicle repairs or maintenance operations; • air emissions, leachate, seeps, or waste -water discharge requiring special permitting or consideration; • pesticide or herbicide misuse or over application; • oil/natural gas or mineral exploration, mining or beneficiation activities; • evidence of discharges, leachate migration, or run-off of potential contaminants from an off -site source onto the subject; or, • high voltage power lines or electrical transmission towers where electromagnetic fields might pose a concern. 6.2 Nearbv Properties A reconnaissance was made of contiguous and nearby properties. These properties were viewed from public streets or accessible vantages without trespassing. Based on topography ECS Project No. 8232 - 12 - March 23, 2004 and surface drainage patterns, residential properties to the southwest are at the same elevation as the site or down slope. Unless otherwise noted, no opportunistic dumping, drums, USTs, monitoring wells, remediation systems or other environmentally suspicious conditions or activities were observed on adjacent properties The property is bounded to the north by Opequon Creek with the remainder of the Artrip farm beyond; to the east by the Artrip Farm with U.S. Route 522 beyond; to the south by the Lakeside subdivision and a Frederick County Sanitation Authority easement and sewage lagoons; and, to the west by undeveloped wooded land with residential properties beyond. . ASTs were observed on the adjoining FCSA property. These ASTs are down slope of the site and appeared to be in good condition with no readily apparent release having occurred. There were no commercial or industrial facilities observed in the vicinity of the property. F �71 -0 ECS Project No, 8232 March 23, 2004 -13- c EMa 7.1 Title Information 7.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Attempts were made to obtain Chain -of -title information at the Office of the Clerk of Frederick County Circuit Court. The chain -of -title information found indicates the property is currently owned by Winchester Artrip LLC and is recorded in Deed Book. 713 on Page 471. This deed book reference is incorrect as it refers back to Brookland Heights Section III property located south of Valley Mill Road near Winchester, Virginia. Due to this the previous ownership ofAhe property was established through an interview conducted with Mr. Frank Artrip. Mr. Artrip indicated that he purchased the property in 1962 from the Sloanacker family whom owned the property since 1892. Mr. Artrip also indicated that the property was sold to Louggia development in 1988. 7.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Map and City Directory Review Given the rural nature of the subject and considering there has been no prior development of the property, there were no city directories or insurance maps available in the local library or other readily obtainable sources. I C-1, - 40 ECS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 7.3 Aerial Photograph and Topographic Map Review Historical records were reviewed to identify past activities of potential environmental significance on or near the site. Aerial photographs (Years: 1950, 1958, 1972, and 1995) were examined at the following offices: Natural Resource Conservation Service Frederick County Planning & Zoning. A review of aerial photographs indicates that the property has remained unimproved and used primarily for pasture since 1950. There are no suspicious disturbances or activities evident in the photographs .examined. No feed lots, manure pits, poultry houses, dairy operations, orchards or similar intensive agricultural activities are evident on the subject. This observation is consistent with the recollections . of area residents and other persons knowledgeable about local history. Most of the community at this time is characterized as rural farmland. The only major change in the photographs is that the on -site pond is not present in the 1950 photograph, 4 Local Sources An interview was conducted with Mr. Frank Artrip, a previous owner. Mr. Artrip indicated that he owned the property from 1962 to 1988 and that it was used exclusively as pasture land. He also indicated that prior to his ownership, the land was also used exclusively as pasture. Mr. Artrip was not aware of any environmental issues related to the site. He indicated that a late 19`h century dwelling area including a well and cemetery were located on the property. Interviews and FOIA Requests Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests were either made in person or via facsimile to the following County agencies for information concerning environmental incidents- on or near the subject. Stephens City Fire Hall Frederick County Division of Environmental Health The Health Department reports that no records are maintained for the site. We are still awaiting a response from the Stephens City Fire Hall. If additional information is received, it will be forwarded promptly. ECS Project No. 8232 - 15 - March 23, 2004 r' G� 8.0 OTHER SERVICES ASTM guidelines identify non -scope issues that are beyond the scope of this practice. Some of these non -scope issues include; asbestos -containing material survey, soil and groundwater testing, radon survey, lead -based paint testing, lead in drinking water testing, wetlands delineation and regulatory compliance audits.. None of these non -scope issues were requested, proposed or included in our scope of work. ECS Project No. 8232- March 23, 2004 c� 9.0 CONCLUSIONS ECS, Ltd. has completed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment on the Winchester Artrip LP property located in Frederick County, Virginia. The ESA was completed in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-00. Any exceptions to or deletions from this practice are described in Section 2.3 of this report. To conclude, this assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions; therefore, no further environmental investigation is recommended for the subject. . _j Although not within the scope of services. for this assessment,documented wetlands were noted, as well as possible additional wetlands which were observed during our site visit in the drainage ways and low lying areas. As such, ECS, Ltd. recommends that a wetlands delineation be performed prior to the development of the site. ECS Project No. 8232 March 23, 2004 - 17- 10.0 REFERENCES ASTM, 2000. ASTM Standards on Environmental Site Assessments for Commercial Real Estate. ASTM E 1527-00. Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. Holmes, R.L. and D.L. Wagner. 1987. Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia. US Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service in cooperation with Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. 206 pp. plus appendices. 1 Geologic Map of the Virginia Portion of the Winchester 30x60 Quadrangle, (Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy; Division of Mineral Resources, 2001) I =4 'i 0 APPENDIX FIGURE I• The Villages at Artrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan • APPENDIX D HISTORIC SITES AND STRUCTURES REPORT • .7 U4 J 4 [11 "A _J • resource manage ment Mr. Michael T. Wiley, Vice President & Branch Manager Dewberry ; 611 West Jubal Early Drive Building B, Suite C Winchester, Virginia 22601 preservation planning. %n RE: Draft Historic sites and structures report for the Proposed Villages at Artrip Development, Frederick County, Virginia.sx Dear Mr. Wiley: R_ Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. is pleased to submit this letter report detailing the findings of the historic sites and structures report for the approximately 170 acre Artrip property, Frederick County, Virginia. ,A combined commercial and residential developrnent is planned for the area. This development will necessitate the concomitant creation of infrastructure including access roads and parking lots, and water and sewer facilities, as well as construction of buildings and landscape modification. This study is designed to identify areas of historical and archeological potential, in order to guidance for planning. This investigation was cgpducted following Secretary of the. Interior's Standards and Guidelines, and those promulgated by the "ginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR). This letter report will review the. " findings of the preliminary study, and discuss the potential impacts to cultural resources within the proposed development area. R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. is pleased to have had the opportunity to work with Dewberry. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions concerning this historic sites and structures study or the information providein this letter report. We are at your service. Sicerely, - Suzanne Sanders, M.A. Senior Project Manager 241 East Fourth' Street, Suite 100' Frederick, Maryland 2 170 1 (301) 694-0428 Fax (301) 695-5237 frederick@rcgoodwin.com www.rcgoodwin.com Frederick,MD New Orleans, LA Tallahassee,FL 6 Historic Sites and Structures Report Introduction This summary report presents the results of the desktop study and historic sites and structures analysis for the proposed development of the Artip Property, Frederick County, Virginia. This study was prepared for Dewberry by R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. Conducted in April 2004, the analysis included a review of archeological site files at VDHR; a brief review of historic maps and documents on file in Frederick County, Virginia; a review of previous archeological and historical studies related to this portion of Frederick County; and, an on -site reconnaissance to assess the integrity of the previously documented archeological resources within the property. In this Historic Sites and Structures report, a discussion of the previous archeological and architectural investigations that have been conducted in the area is presented first, followed by a discussion of the previously recorded archeological and built resources in the vicinity. This summary is followed by a discussion of the results of preliminary deed research for the property, and research into the families that formerly owned or occupied the property. The final section presents a summary description of the archeological sites that have been recorded within the project area, and a discussion of the potential effect �• of the planned development, and management recommendations for those resources. The Project Area Located southeast of Winchester, the proposed development area encompasses approximately 170 acres, south of Opequon Creek, between Highways 81 and 522. (Figure 1). Development plans include the construction of combined commercial and residential areas that include both detached, single-family dwellings, and townhome and apartment complexes. Topographically the area is composed of rolling hills, surrounding two deeply cut drainages that drain northward into Opequon Creek, which forms the northern boundary of the parcel. Current vegetation consists of open grassy areas that mark abandoned agricultural fields or pastureland. Several fence lines cross the area, with ten to twenty-year growth and some older growth trees interspersed. Due to the rolling topography, there are several ridges and knolls within the proposed development area. Generally, these are broad and are covered by grasses and a scattered 20-40 year growth of cedars and volunteer hardwoods. Some hardwood thickets have developed in some areas. Within the drainages on the north, vegetation consists older growth hardwoods with an understory of vines and grasses. f-_--- Previous Investigations Five previous surveys or studies have been conducted in the immediate vicinity. One of these surveys included portions of the project area. In 1991, a survey group from James Madison University and Shenandoah University conducted survey of 4,900 acres along Opequon Creek. Field archeologists from James Madison University and Shenandoah University conducted the survey between December 1, 1990 and April 1, 1991. Of the 147 prehistoric archeological sites and 165 historic archeological sites identified, the team identified five historic archeological sites: 34-0080, 34-0112, 34-0116, 34-0117, and 34-0118 (Geier et al. 1991). Four of these sites are within the current project area, and will be discussed below. In 1997, Gray & Pape Inc. conducted Phase .I and II cultural resources investigations as part of a project to build a Route 37 bypass east of Winchester. The Phase I investigation identified one archeological site in the immediate vicinity, 44FK0539, a portion of Civil War Camp Russell. Following a Phase II investigation, the firm recommended for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, C, and D. Also as.a result of the Phase II investigation, sites 44FK0062, 44FK0063, and 44FK0072 were examined. Site 44FK0063, a Civil War fortification, was recommended for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria D.- Gray & Pape recommended that three resources in the immediate vicinity of the project location be listed together on the National Register of Historic Places as the Camp Russell Historic District. The structures, Hillandale House (34-126), Hillandale Earthworks (34- 321), and Camp Russell (44FK539), were recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion A for their part in Sheridan's Valley campaign. They also were determined eligible under Criterion C as a well-preserved example of a Civil War encampment in the Shenandoah .Valley, and under Criterion D for their potential to yield information on Civil War camps. Although the Camp Russell District is not listed on the National Register, an MOA, developed in 1999, between Federal Highway Administration and. the Virginia SFI PO recognizes Hillandale House, the earthworks, and 44FK539 as contributing elements to the proposed Camp Russell District. This recognition requires that the resources be treated as though they are National Register properties. An earlier cultural resources study of Route 37 bypass alternatives identified one site (44FK0085) northeast of the current project location, consisting of a small dam installed to create a pond for livestock (Geier et al. 1992). Architectural historian Maral S. Kalbian conducted two architectural surveys that encompassed the project area and the immediate vicinity. Kalbian conducted a three-phase survey of rural landmarks in Frederick County from fall 1988 to fall 1992. She identified no structures within the project area, but recorded eight structures in the immediate vicinity: Smith -Wakeman House (34-1342), Sam Plasters House (34-1340), Hillandale (34-0126), Steele -Clark House (34-1339), Ralph Wakeman House (34-1343), Craig House (34- { • 1341), and Caiysbrook Redoubt (34-320) (Kalbian 1992). . 3 f� 1 Also in 1992, Kalbian conducted an overlapping architectural survey to evaluate effects on architectural resources of proposed corridor alternatives to a Route 37 bypass. Three structures Kalbian identified as potentially eligible for the National Register of Historic Places are located in the immediate vicinity: Hillandale (34-126), Carysbrook Redoubt (34-320), and Parkins Mill Battery (34-458). Kalbian suggested that Hillandale might be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, B., and C, and suggested that Carysbrook Redoubt and Parkins Mill Battery were eligible under Criteria A and C. Previous investigations also include the preparation of an impact analysis statement for the neighboring Crosspointe Center Property. That document discussed the presence of four rural landmarks within the property. Of those four, two have been evaluated as potentially National Register eligible. Furthest from the Artrip property and closest to Interstate 81 is the Hillandale House, begun in the late eighteenth century, the farmstead also is a part of a larger area identified as Camp Russell. This National Register eligible complex includes, earthworks and campsites, and the creation of a National Register District has been recommended. All of these resources will be discussed below, in more detail. Of note in the previous Impact Statement are the observations that the area that includes the Artrip property is a part of the very extensive Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic Landmark District. This district, created in 1997, includes all of Frederick County, as well as seven other. counties that occupy the Shenandoah Valley. The NHL includes 162 National Register listed properties, one National Landmark, and one National Park.. The Immediate Vicinity Previously Identified Sites All of the archeological sites within the project area, and in the immediate vicinity were identified in late 1990 and early 1991 by a team affiliated with the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at James Madison University. Ten sites have a historic connection to Civil War encampments and battles; one of these has been recommended for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Nine relate to local agricultural or industrial activities of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and have prehistoric components. Previously identified prehistoric sites indicate a high activity level associated with Opequon Creek. All of the previously recorded prehistoric sites are north of Opequon Creek. One is to the east, one is directly north of the project area, and two are to the west, nearer to Interstate 81. Located north of Opequon Creek, • across from the northeastern corner of the project area, the unnamed prehistoric site, 44FK0079, comprised 4 r=. a thin scatter of lithic artifacts. No date has been assigned to the site, and part of the site has been destroyed. Directly north of the project area, 44FK0064 is a multi -component site that includes evidence for eighteenth and nineteenth century activities, as well as prehistoric cultural materials. The site lies on propery first patented by James Vance in 1752; artifacts and the site's setting suggest that this is the original Vance homesite. Two prehistoric sites of unknown date are located to the west of the property. Both sites are listed as lithic scatters. Site 44FK0070 is closer, to the project area, and site 44FK0074 is further west, nearer to I80. Historic period activity included a concentration of military sites along Opequon Creek. Eight Civil War - related sites are clustered to the northwest of the project area, within the boundary of the Camp Russell Historic District. These include five earthworks, two campsites, and a domestic site that includes evidence of Civil War activity. The archeological site for Camp Russell is located across Opequon Creek, immediately north of the project area. Camp Russell Historic District Immediately to the northwest of the proposed development area, four Civil War -related structures and sites were included in the proposed Camp Russell Historic District; these include one structure, two redoubts/batteries, and an earthwork. Upon completion of a Phase I and H survey and evaluation in 1997, the recommendation was made that three resources be listed together on the National Register. of Historic Places as the Camp Russell Historic District (34-5036)(Gray & Pape, Inc. 1997). The resources, Hillandale House (34-126), Hillandale Earthworks (34-321; 44FK63), and Camp Russell (44FK539), were recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, C, and D. Under Criterion A, the resources were evaluated as significant for their part in Sheridan's Valley campaign; under Criterion C, they are considered a well-preserved example of a Civil War encampment in the Shenandoah Valley; and, under Criterion D these resource are significant for their potential to yield information on Civil War camps. * Other resources within the proposed boundary include earthworks, encampment sites, and' domestic sites. Contributing Resources Within the District The first of these resources, the Hillandale/Crawford House (34-126), near I81, was built between 1780 and 1800. The complex consists of a dwelling, a smoke/meat house, a springhouse, a carriage house, a shed, a silo, and a barn. Other relevant construction dates are c. 1875-1890 and c. 1910-1930. During the Civil War, Union General Emory may have camped in the front yard. This structure was recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The second resource, the Camp Russell/Hillandale Earthworks (34-321; 44FK63), north of the project area, is an example of one of the several Union earthworks built in this part of the Shenandoah Valley during the Civil War, and one of the 5 I� I �• largest. Many of the 40,000 troops in the area camped here. The one -square mile site was considered to be in good condition. The site has been recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places because of its national significance in military history. The third resource is the archeological site for Camp Russell (44FK0539), believed to have been part of a Union Army camp in 1864. Surface features indicate that tents or huts were located here. The site yielded bottle fragments, one buckle, brick fragments, bone, and miscellaneous metal fragments. After a Phase II investigation, consultant Gray & Pape Inc. recommended in 1997.that the site. be listed on the National Register of Historic Places under Criteria A, C, and D. Non-contributing Resources Within the District Within the Historic District, five archeological sites contain various types of earthworks related to Civil War encampments in the area. These sites are not included as contributing elements to the proposed District. Closest to the project area are earthworks (44FK0067) related to the Union Army XIX Corps' winter 1864 defenses; and a 100 by 100-foot site (44FK0071) that contains a pair of parallel set shallow i trenches that intersect an old road. Dating from an unknown historic period, the trenches might have been a timbering chute or a pair of shallow, nested rifle trenches built during the Civil War and used as outer defenses against movements into more complex forts to the west. Slightly.further west, and still north of Opequon Creek are two more earthworks. The first is an L- shaped remnant of a Union fortification, that covers a 400 x 400 foot area (44FK0063), and has been described as part of the Union Army XIX Corps' winter 1964 defense after the Battle of Cedar Creek; this resource is associated with the Camp Russell/Hillandale Earthworks built resource described above. Only the southernmost tip of the fort was observed; additional data was obtained from mapping. conducted earlier. The second is a roughly circular earthwork (44FK0072) with outer walls two feet tall. This feature initially was interpreted as a possible Union Army XIX Corps base. However, subsequent investigators suggested that this site actually might be a massive animal burrow, with road spoil deposited on top of it, and determined that it was not significant (Gray & Pape 1997). One additional Civil War era earthwork (44FK0073)'is listed further west, near I8L This 30-foot by 100- foot site has been interpreted as the possible remains of a Civil War rifle trench that has been impacted by plowing. General Emory, commander of the Union Army XIX Corps, had his base of operations at Hillandale, located 400 feet west of this site. Within the Historic District Boundary, two additional, adjacent sites have been recorded that may reflect Civil War era encampments. Both sites are on the extreme southwestern edge of the District, near I 81. Just east of Interstate 81, 44FK 0075 yielded debris that might be from the Union Anny encampment in the area. The 50-foot by 35-foot site yielded five pieces of large handmade brick, some grit -tempered, and on i� fragments of bottle glass, including two black glass pieces, two amber pieces, and one bottle base from a blue-green bottle. These fragments are believed to be ale, porter, or other beverage glassware of the mid - nineteenth century. Also just east of I81 and adjacent to 44 FK0075, 44FK 0076 contains debris from the Union Army military camp of winter 1864. The 36-foot by 36-foot site yielded handmade brick pieces, a black glass bottle lip fragment, and a body fragment to an amber bottle. Also within the district boundary, one domestic site (44FK 0077) also contains components related to Civil War activities. Located north of the two campsites described above, this 600-foot by 400-foot farmstead consists of a single dwelling and support structures that might have been built in the late eighteenth century by William Chipley. The farm complex was used during winter 1864 as a center of operations for General Emory, commander of the Union Army XIX Corps. A large platform that has been cut into the yard, west of the house, and might have been the location of Emory's personal tent, or might have been a summer kitchen built before the Civil War. Other Resources Archeological Resources Outside of the Historic District, eight additional historic period sites have been listed. One comprises Civil War earthworks, one each has been classified as domestic, industrial, and transportation, and three are classified as agriculturally related. Five of these sites are located east or southeast of the project area. These include the industrial site (44FK0078) that was the location, east of the northeastern corner of the project area, ofa. dam and race for Parkins Mill in the nineteenth century. It contains the remains of an earthen dam and associated millrace. It was one of three dam complexes built to control and channel water for use at Parkins Mill. The second site is the agriculturally related site (44FK0113) that contains the dilapidated remains of three feeding troughs. The third site, on the southeast, is the transportation site (44FK0114) that consists of the remains of a bridge and road, dating from 1900 to 1950, that were part of the original passage of Route 522 over the stream. The 40-foot by 20-foot site consists of a pair of vertical cement abutments 20 feet wide on both sides of a stream. A 20-foot wide macadam. roadbed extends from both abutment faces. The two remaining agricultural sites comprise a small twentieth-century earth -surfaced dam (44FK0085) that holds water for a small pond for livestock, and an irrigation facility (44FK0110) of unknown date, built in connection with a farm pond. One domestic site (44FK0062) is located north of the northwestern corner of the project area, across Opequon Creek. This site, dating from the eighteenth or nineteenth centuries, contains evidence of a 150- foot by 120-foot dwelling. The west side of the site contained a raised flattened and landscaped area that 7 � 4 might have been a house floor. Cultural materials included brick, lead glazed red earthenware, and flow blue pearlware. There also is one agriculturally related facility north of the property. This site comprises an irrigation facility (44FK0083) of unknown date that consists of a 33-foot by 25-foot scatter of limestone and sandstone blocks. Other materials present included a piece of pane glass and a piece of brown salt - glazed stoneware. One Civil War era site is listed west of the project area, and south of Opequon Creek, outside of the Camp Russell Historic District. This site (44FK0111) was one of three major forts built at the eastern end of a complex defensive system constructed as part. of the Union XIX Corps' Winchester defenses in winter 1864. The 400-foot by 300-foot site consists of a massive earthwork/fort in the shape of a fishhook. Entrenchments are worn, but a shallow exterior depression and interior rifle trench were observed. There is no evidence of an encampment associated with the entrenchment. Built Resources No structures identified in Virginia Department of Historic Resources files are located on the property. Fifteen structures are located in the immediate vicinity. Five are related to the Civil War, and four of those'. have been recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including two (Hillandale House and Hillandale earthworks) that are within the boundaries of the Camp Russell District, and are discussed above. The other ten structures are houses that either have not been evaluated for National Register eligibility or have been recommended ineligible. Those resources closest to the project area are described below. Two resources are structures that relate to Civil War activities. Parkins Mills Battery/Fort Hill (34-458), east of the project area, served as a prominent Confederate Army defensive point. The 1860 structure consists. of eight bunkers within a circular fort formed by a deep ditch. The earthworks remain intact, though obscured from view. It has been recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The second resource, west of the property and south of the proposed district, Cary's Brook Redoubt (34-320), is a defensive structure probably built in fall 1864 after Sheridan secured this part of the Shenandoah Valley. Built by Union soldiers, it is one of several earthen entrenchments and forts in the area, and .it appears to be one of the best preserved. This structure has not been evaluated for National Register of Historic Places eligibility. Ten structures are domestic in nature or are farmsteads. These are in three general groupings: on the northeast in the vicinity of Parkins Mill; on the west, near I81; and, on the south between the project area and Stephens Mill. E --- On the northeast, there are four structures listed, clustered around Parkins Mill. These include two nineteenth century structures, the Frederick Hall/Parkins Mill, an unnamed log residence; and two related twentieth century dwellings, the Solenberger Farm and Tenant House. The earliest of the four structures is the Frederick Hall/Parkins Mill (34-143) domestic/industrial complex. The site name refers to Alfred Parkins, a miller who obtained the property in 1842 and operated a mill here. At the time of his purchase, a mill already was operating, built on this site in approximately 1780 by John Sowers. The original portion of the dwelling dates from 1802 and comprises a two-story brick building with a side gable roof and a wood porch. It is a well-preserved example of Federal architecture, a style unique in the area. In addition to a main dwelling, this complex included several outbuildings: an icehouse, some ruins, a cistern, a dairy, and a privy. Other building dates for the dwelling are the 1820s and the 1930s. Although the structure has not been evaluated formally for National Register of Historic Places eligibility, Virginia Department of . Historic Resources staff members have determined that it is potentially eligible. South of Parkins Mill, and east of the property, is an unnamed log residence (34-434) that was built c. 1820-1840 of squared logs clad in wood shingles. The two-story, three -bay building has a one-story porch and a side gable roof of standing seam metal. Other significant building dates are c. 1900-1920 and c. 1950-1970. Although this site is included in the inventory, it has not been evaluated for National Register of Historic Places eligibility. North of Parkins Mill, there are two related domestic sites, the Solenberger Tenant House and the Solenberger farm/Fort Hill farm. Both are early twentieth century dwellings/complexes. The Solenberger Tenant House (34-454) was built in 1923 to replace a log dwelling tom down in approximately 1914. The dwelling has not been evaluated for National Register of Historic Places eligibility. The Solenberger Farm/Fort Hill Farm (34-455) has been in the Solenberger family since 1866. Activity on the property has included activity related to both the Civil War and World War I. The complex was used as a part of the general defense of Winchester during the Civil War, and members of the United States cavalry camped on the farm shortly before the United States entered World War I. The current farm complex dates from 1910 and consists of a dwelling and several early twentieth-century outbuildings, including a garage, smoke/meat house, silo, barn, and poultry shelter. The property has been determined not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. On the west, two nineteenth century structures are listed: Cary's Brook and the Steele — Clark House. Both are located east of Interstate 81 and west of the current project area. Cary's Brook (34-319) is a c. 1840 dwelling consists of a two-story central section of frame on a stone foundation, and two one-story side wings of frame with brick nogging. Associated outbuildings include a smoke/meat house and some ruins. The dwelling has a gable roof of standing seam metal. Its architectural form and use of two f construction methods is unique for the area. However, the house has been gutted, and is in poor condition; I E --- windows, doors, siding, and the fireplace mantle are missing. The Steele -Clark House (34-1339) is an example of a vernacular, folk Victorian style. The 1'/z-story house was built in 1870 0 r3' f wood frame clad in asphalt shingle. A smoke/meat house is also present on the site. The dwelling has not been evaluated for National Register of Historic Places eligibility. A group of four structures are clustered approximately one mile south of the project area. These include nineteenth and twentieth century dwellings. Two have been assessed as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. The oldest of these four structures is the Smith -Wakeman House (34-1342), a vernacular log dwelling built in about 1800. The dwelling features a late nineteenth-century frame addition. It is one of the few remaining in an area surrounded by modern development. Other structures associated with the dwelling include a c. 1900 barn, a shed, and a mobile home. This structure was recommended not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. The second oldest dwelling is the Craig, H.W. House/Craig-Wakeman House (34-1341). This two-story vernacular Colonial Revival house was built c. 1870 of wood frame clad in aluminum siding. Other structures on the site include a shed, an office, a barn, and a silo. The dwelling was altered and possibly converted into apartments, and was recommended not eligible for listing on the National Register of • Historic Places. The two twentieth century buildings are the Sam Plaster House and the Ralph Wakeman House (34-1343). The Plaster House (34-1340) is a'vemacular hip -roofed dwelling that was built between 1920 and 1940. The building is a wooden frame clad in vinyl siding. Other structures present on the site include a barn, a foundation, and a garage. The dwelling was recommended not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places in 1994. The Ralph Wakeman House (34-1343), a 1%-story vernacular wood -frame house built in 1900, also was evaluated as not eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Artrip Property Results of Deed Research The Virginia site form identified the farmstead as the William Albin farm, based on the presence of a headstone in the graveyard for William Albin, said to have dated to the late eighteenth century. A cursory examination of land transfer documents pursued land transactions associated with the proposed • development area into the middle of the nineteenth century, and did not find reference to William Albin. 10 There is some indication that duruig the early portion of the nineteenth century the property may have been associated with the Parkins Mill properties to the northeast. However, by the middle of the nineteenth century, upon the death of Albert Parkins, Sr., the parcel was treated as a separate tract. The records indicate the project area has changed hands five times since the late nineteenth century. Most of these transactions were in the latter half of the twentieth century, culminating with the creation of the Artrip Limited partnership in 1989. The earliest records examined as a part of this survey dealt with a parcel that Phillip Williams sold to Alfred Parkins; Mr. Williams foreclosed on a deed of trust of the Sowers family. John Sowers may have obtained the property in two transactions conducted in the late eighteenth century: in 1779, James Knight sold 100. acres to Sowers, and in 1788, James Knight's estate sold 116 acres to Sowers (Quarles 1990). The . property in question included a merchants' mill, a fulling mill, and milling -related equipment. The deed also mentions an adjoining 150-acre tract with water rights on the Opequon (Quarles'l990); this parcel may have included the Artrip property. The property is not identified on Varle's 1809 Map of Frederick County (Figure 1), nor does it appear on Wood's 1860's Map of Frederick County (Figure 2). Thirty-five years later, in 1877, property belonging to Alfred Parkins was sold, upon his death, to Robinson Keyser. Mr. Keyser apparently bought 500•- 570 acres, and a share of corn and wheat crops for $4,500:00. (• The parcel was described as a tract along Opequon Creek, five miles from Winchester. This tract, s including his house, apparently was a portion of the properties Parkins owned at his death; it adjoined a tract that contained Frederick Mills that had been sold to Alfred Parkins, Jr. Five years later, in 1882, Robinson and Elizabeth Keyser sold 575 acres to Jesse R Bailey. This tract is described as located along the Winchester Front Royal Turnpike. Thirty years later, Jesse and Carrie Bailey sold 476 acres to Albert Slonaker. This transaction, in 1912, included "all those certain tracts or parcels of land with buildings and improvements 5.5 miles from Winchester, along the Winchester Front Royal Road" In 1951, Albert Slonaker sold the property, with the exception of two parcels totaling six acres, to Hugh and Naomi Slonaker. In 1962, the Slonakers sold the 450-acre property to W.F. Artrip, Jr. Family Research Books, manuscripts, and other materials were examined at the archives at Handley Library in Winchester to determine if additional information concerning past occupants of the project area was readily available. No significant information was found about the Artrip family, which owned the property from 1962 to 1989. The Slonaker family, owners of the property from 1912 to 1962, was the subject of an extensive genealogy of Slonaker descendants in the United States written in 1941, A History and Genealogy of the Slonaker Descendants in America since Early 1700 (Slonaker 1941). According to this genealogy, the family has a • 11 long history in Virginia and West Virginia. Albert L. Slonaker, who purchased the property in 1912, was listed in the genealogy as a farmer born in 1869 in Cold Stream, West Virginia. He conveyed the property to his son and daughter-in-law, Hugh and Naomi Slonaker, in 1951, but lived in Sir Johns Run, West Virginia, when the genealogy was published in 1941. However, earlier census records list Albert and Elizabeth Slonaker and their children, including Hugh, as Frederick County residents. Apparently, Albert and Elizabeth Slonaker raised their children on the property, and then moved to West Virginia while maintaining ownership. When Albert Slonaker sold it, he was a widower. Hugh and Naomi Slonaker owned the property for I 1 years, from 1951 to 1962. It is not clear whether they lived on the property. No substantial information was found that revealed potential significance of the Slonaker family. One brief 1977 recollection in the library's manuscript file revealed that Albert's first cousin was Adam C. Slonaker, who came to Winchester in 1898 from Hampshire County, West Virginia, and purchased a local coal company, Miller Supply Co. The business also sold farm supplies and bark for use in tanning. Upon his death in .1928, the Winchester Evening Star called him a "prominent businessman." The business was sold to the Canter Oil Co. in 1968 but was still operating under the Slonaker name in 1980. There is no evidence that Adam C. Slonaker had any connection to the project area. Little information was found for other owners of the project area, including Jesse R. Bailey and Robinson Keyser. D.J. Lake's 1885 Atlas of Frederick County, Virginia . (Figure 3) indicates the location of Bailey's residence just west of the Winchester -Front Royal Turnpike, on land that probably was part of his purchase described in the 1882 deed, which included the project area. Previously Identified Sites within'the Property Although extensive evidence exists for intensive prehistoric and historic period activity along Opequon Creek, to date, no evidence has been found of prehistoric activity within the Artrip parcel. The previously identified sites date from the historic period, and reflect eighteenth, nineteenth or twentieth century activity. Historic period activity along Opequon Creek has included domestic; agricultural, industrial, and transportation -related sites that span the eighteenth, nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Five previously identified archeological sites are present within the proposed development area; at least four of the five sites are interrelated and represent a possible district associated with the eighteenth through twentieth century occupation of the William Albin Farm. All of these sites are located in the central and north - central portion of the property, along the well -established drainages that drain northward into Opequon Creek. The central site is the Wiliam Albin Farm (44FK112); which was recorded.in 1991 as an eighteenth and nineteenth century rural farmstead. A James Madison University survey (Grier 1991) identified the site as 12 an approximately 140' x 150' area that included a depression that represented the former location of a dwelling or large outbuilding; this feature currently is not visible (Figure 4). Limited testing at that time produced a relatively high quantity of historic period cultural materials. These included architectural items reflective of the presence of buildings, including cut nails, window glass, brick, stone and other construction rubble. Other materials included kitchen ceramics and glasswares. Some of these material types reflected late eighteenth to early nineteenth century activity, including pearlware, lead glazed red earthenwares, and mold blown glass. The site form also references the potential for the presence of an abandoned roadway along the eastern side of the site, and identifies the road as the possible location of the Valley Pike to Parkins' Mill Road (Geier 1991). An ancillary site to the central farmstead is the well, or sink (44FK116) located slightly to the west of the core farm. complex. This site also was identified during the James Madison College survey in 1991. At that time, it was described as a square feature excavated into the ground to collect water from one of the many seeps and springs that drain across the property, and into Opequon Creek (Geier 1991). At that time, the feature was described as an eight foot square limestone lined cistern, with a three foot opening, that was covered by logs (Geier 1991). A third component of the Albin farm complex comprises an earthen dam (44FK117), built across the major drainage on the northwestern side of the complex. When recorded in 1991, the feature was described as a ca. 50 foot length of earthwork placed across the drainage to create a farm pond (Geier 1991). Examination of the property in 2004 indicated that although the end portions of the dam still are present, the water from the seeps above it have cut through its center (Figure 5). The feature also is covered with various vines and grasses. The final component of the Albin farm complex is a small graveyard (44FK118) in the northeastern portion of the area. This feature also was recorded in 1991; at that time,'it was identified as a small, family plot containing a minimum of two graves, and possibly more. Local informants indicated that the graveyard contained burials dating from the early nineteenth century, with one from the late eighteenth century (Geier 1991). Although the presence of a headstone (for William Albin) was recorded, and later reference indicated that the headstone was broken and resting against a nearby tree, a reconnaissance in April 2004 failed to relocate the headstone. There is deep leaf litter covering the ground, and the headstone may have fallen and been covered (Figure 6). The two graves were relocated, along with the possible location of a third. The initial record indicated that the graves were oriented north —south; they actually are oriented east -west. A fifth site within the proposed development area comprised a late historic period dump (44FK115) in the • extreme northeastern portion of the property. This site was identified in 1991 as a possible mid -twentieth 13 — century dump, covering a 20 x 60 foot area located at the head of a deeply cut drainage that feeds into Opequon Creek (Geier 1991). Planned Development Undeveloped Areas The present concept plan calls for the creation of a combined residential and commercial development that encompasses most of the 170-acre site area. The two major drainages that feed Opequon Creek on the north, and the steeply sloped areas that flank them are excepted from the design plan, as are the smaller drainages that cross the property on the south and southeast_ Two of the previously identified resources, the Graveyard and the Dump Site, are located within the northern area, outside of the planned development. Recommendation for the Graveyard (44FK118). The site is outside of the planned area for construction, and may.not be impacted by construction. However, the immediate vicinity should be cleared of brush and examined through remote sensing to determine the extent of the graveyard, and an estimate of the number of interments within it. Then the boundaries should be clearly marked, and the area fenced for controlled access. (• Recommendation for the Dump Site (44FK 115). This site may require reexamination to. determine its true age, and whether it exhibits either significance or research potential. 'However, it appears to be outside of the planned construction area. If the site is not to be affected by construction, then its location and boundaries should be clearly marked for avoidance. Landbay A Covering 90 acres, the largest portion of the proposed development, Landbay A, occupies the northern and central portions of the property. In this area a combination of detached single family, townhome and apartment -style dwellings are planned. Some commercial activity also is planned. The development of this area includes the installation of infrastructure and parking, as well as landscaping, and the creation of a park that will occupy the northwestern portion of Landbay A. Three of the previously identified cultural resources, the William Albin Farmstead (44FK112), the Earthen Dam (44FK118), and the .Well/Cistem (44FK116), are located within this portion of the property. Recommendation for the William Albin farm (44FK112). Although a reconnaissance of the site area in April 2004 failed to relocate the exact location of the foundation, the other landscape signatures were present, including the road trace and the large pine tree on the eastern side of the site. Currently, the site is covered in vines and grasses, reflective of abandoned pasture, with occasional cedar and hardwood scrub (• thickets. The site appears to have been largely undisturbed since the initial site form was recorded; 14 however, the cellar hole appears to have filled in. Within Landbay A, the site area is located within the western portion of the area designated for single-family apartments. Construction in this area includes landscape modification, buildings, parking, infrastructure, landscaping. Evaluatory testing would be required to determine the exact site boundaries, and whether the site retains sufficient integrity and research potential to require mitigation prior to construction. Recommendation for the Well or Sink (44FK116). This feature was not relocated during the field reconnaissance. The vicinity in which the site is mapped is slated for open area surrounding single-family detached homes. Depending on its actual location, the site may be avoided during construction, and appropriately fenced for avoidance by future residents. Alternatively, the site may be evaluated to more accurately assess its significance and research potential, and then avoided or mitigated as necessary. Recommendation for The Earthen Dam (44FK118). Like the well/sink, this feature is located in the northwestern portion of Landbay A, on the eastern edge of the single-family housing development. The feature is located in the drainage and may not be directly affected by construction and landscape modification for the single-family homes, but may be affected by the activity for the apartment complexes directly to the south. The boundaries for this site should be clearly identified and the site avoided during construction. ( •Landbay B Landbay B is a much smaller area that occupies approximately 20 acres of the southwestem corner of the property; several groups of single-family homes are planned for this area. There are no previously identified cultural resources in this portion of the property. Landbay C D E F Landbay C, D, E, and F are smaller parcels that occupy the southeastern comer of the property. Together, these areas occupy just under 16 acres. In this portion of the property, recreational and commercial developments are planned for Landbays C and D, and garden apartments are planned for Landbay F. No previously identified resources have been recorded in these areas. Summary and Conclusion This summary report presents the results of the desktop study and historic sites and structures analysis for the proposed development of the Artip Property, Frederick County, Virginia. Five previous investigations have been conducted in the immediate vicinity of the project area. Previous investigations also include the preparation of an impact analysis statement for the neighboring Crosspointe Center Property. All of the archeological sites within the project area, and in the immediate vicinity were identified in late 1990 and 15 I a early 1991 by a team affiliated with the Department of Sociology and Anthropology at James Madison University. Sites The high density of archeological sites to the north and northwest of the project area reflects intensive prehistoric and historic period activity, especially during the Civil War. In the immediate vicinity, ten sites have a historic connection to Civil War encampments and battles; one of these has been recommended for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. Nine relate to local agricultural or industrial activities of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and have prehistoric components. All of the prehistoric sites are north of Opequon Creek. Eight Civil War -related sites are clustered to the northwest of the project area, within the boundary of the Camp Russell Historic District. These include five earthworks, two campsites, and a domestic site that includes evidence of Civil War activity. Immediately to the northwest of the proposed development area, a complex of Civil War -related structures and sites were included in the proposed Camp Russell Historic District. Outside of the Historic District, eight additional historic period sites have been listed. These sites reflect the variety of economic activities in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. One site comprises Civil War earthworks, one each have been classified as domestic, industrial, and transportation, and three are classified as agriculturally related. Five of these sites are located east or southeast of the project area. These include the industrial site (44FK0078) that was the location, east of the northeastern corner of the project area, of a dam and race for Parkins Mill in the nineteenth century. Structures No structures identified in Virginia Department of Historic Resources files are located on the property; 15 structures are located in the immediate vicinity. Five are related to the Civil War, and four of those have been recommended eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places; including two (Hillandale House and Hillandale earthworks) that are within the boundaries of the Camp Russell District. The other ten structures are houses that either have not been evaluated for -National Register eligibility or have been recommended ineligible. The planned development will not have an effect on any of these resources. Artrip Property A cursory examination of land transfer documents pursued land transactions associated with the proposed development area into the middle of the nineteenth century. The earliest records examined as a part of this survey dealt with a parcel that Phillip Williams sold to Alfred Parkins; W. Williams foreclosed on a deed of trust of the Sowers family. John Sowers may have obtained the property .in two transactions conducted in the late eighteenth century. Thirty-five years later, the connection appears to become a little stronger 16 when, in 1871, property belonging to Alfred Parkins was sold, upon his death, to Robinson Keyser. Five years later, in 1882, Robinson and Elizabeth Keyser sold 575 acres to Jesse R. Bailey. Preliminary examination of materials at the archives at Handley Library in Winchester provided little information concerning past occupants of the project area.. No significant information was found about the Artrip family; the Slonaker family, owners of the property from 1912 to 1962, was the subject of an extensive genealogy. No substantial information was found that revealed potential significance of the Slonaker family. Little information was found for other owners of the project area, including Jesse R. Bailey and Robinson Keyser. D.J. Lake's 1885 Atlas of Frederick County, Virginia depicts Bailey's residence just west of the Winchester -Front Royal Turnpike, on land that probably was part of his purchase described in the 1882 deed, which included the project area. Although extensive evidence exists for intensive prehistoric and historic period activity along Opequon Creek, to date, no evidence has been found of prehistoric activity within the Artrip parcel. The previously identified sites date from the historic period, and reflect eighteenth, nineteenth or twentieth century activity. Five previously identified archeological sites are present within the proposed development area; at least four of the five sites are interrelated and represent a possible district associated with the eighteenth through twentieth century occupation of the William Albin Farm. All of these sites are located in the central and north -central portion of the property, along the well -established drainages that drain northward into Opequon Creek. The central site is the William Albin Farm (44FK112); which was recorded in 1991 as an eighteenth and nineteenth century rural farmstead. An ancillary site to the central farmstead is the well, or sink (44FK116) located slightly to the west of the core farm complex. A third component of the farm complex comprises an earthen dam (44FK117), built across the major drainage on the northwestern side of the complex. The final component of the complex is a small graveyard (44FK118) in the northeastern portion of the area. A fifth, unrelated, site within the proposed development area comprised a late historic period dump (44FK115) in the extreme northeastern portion of the properly. The present concept plan calls for the creation of a combined residential and commercial development that encompasses most of. the 170-acre site area. The two major drainages that feed Opequon Creek on the north, and the steeply sloped areas that flank them are exempted from the design plan, as are the smaller drainages that cross the property on the south and southeast. Two of the previously identified resources, the Graveyard and the Dump Site, are located within the northern area, outside of the planned development. Avoidance has been recommended for the dump, and evaluation of its extent and integrity has been recommended for the graveyard, along with fencing for controlled access. Three of the previously identified cultural resources, the William Albin Farmstead (44FK112), the Earthen Dam (44FK118), and 17 I �• the Well/Cistern (44FK116), are located within the onion of the property P p p rty identified as Laridbay A. Determination of boundaries, evaluation of integrity and research potential have been recommended for these three sites. References Consulted Botwick, Brad, and Ashley M. Neville, with contributions by Robert D. Clarke and Debra A. McClane 1997 Phase I and HCultural Resource Investigations, Route 37, Frederick County, Virginia. Gray & Pape, Inc. Prepared for Michael Baker Jr., Inc., Virginia Beach, Virginia. Ebert, Rebecca A., and Teresa Lazazzera . -1988 Frederick County, Virginia. -from the Frontier to the Future. The Donning Company, Norfolk, Virginia. n.a. 1997 Hammond's Edition of the 1885 Atlas of Frederick County, Virginia, with Added Map and Index. G.P. Hammond Publishing, Broadway, Virginia. Geier, Clarence R. and Warren R. Hofstra, with contributions by Joseph Whitehorn, James Wilson, and Leila Wood. 1991 An Archeological Survey of and Management Plan for Cultural Resources in the Vicinity ofthe Upper Opequon Creek. Submitted to Frederick County Board of Supervisors. Geier, Clarence R., Ph.D., Warren Hofstra, Ph.D.,.and Joseph Whitehome 1992 A Phase I Evaluation ofArcheological Cultural Resources in Place on Terrain Lying within Corridor Alternatives of the Route 37 Winchester Bypass, Frederick County, Virginia. Department of Sociology and Anthropology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, Virginia. Submitted to Maguire and Associates, Inc., Virginia Beach, Virginia. Maral S. Kalbian 1992 Rural Landmarks Survey Report, Frederick County, Virginia. Winchester - Frederick County Historical Society, Winchester, Virginia. Prepared for the Frederick County Board of Supervisors and Virginia Department of Historic Resources. 1992 A Phase (Architectural Resource Survey Report of the Proposed Route 37 Corridor Study of Frederick County, Virginia. Prepared for Maguire Associates, Inc. Slonaker, James Rollin, Ph.D., ed. 1941 A History and Genealogy of the Slonaker Descendants in America since Early 1700. Lyday Printing Company, Los Angeles, California. 18 E Sullivan, Jessica p. 22. 1980 "Remember When `Coal Was King'?" The Winchester Star, 18 December 1980 Lehman, Sam 1989 The Story of Frederick County. Winchester, Virginia. Quarles, Garland R. 1990 Some Old Homes in Frederick County, Virginia, revised edition. Winchester - Frederick County Historical Society, Winchester, Virginia. Varle, Charles 1809 Frederick, Berkeley, and Jefferson Counties, Virginia.. Wood, John . 1860s Frederick County, Virginia, from Wood's map. Land records, Frederick County Courthouse Manuscript file, Handley Library Ii 19 Appendix I Partial Chain of Title 15 May 1989 713/417 GRANTOR: W.F. Artrip, Enid R. Artrip GRANTEE: Winchester Artrip Limited Partnership and David S. Holliday, homme sole, party of the third part --Tract One: Land in the Shawnee Magisterial District containing 157.009 acres, and being a portion of the parcel conveyed to W.F. Artrip by Hugh G. Slonaker et ux dated 20 August 1962 and recorded in 281/221 -Tract Two:. 0.915 acres 20 August 1962 281/221 GRANTOR: Hugh G. and Naomi F. Slonaker GRANTEE: W.F. Artrip Jr. --450 acres on the west side of Route 522/Winchester-Front Royal Road --same property conveyed by Albert L. Slonaker to Hugh and Naomi Slonaker 4 December 1951 and recorded in 221/345 4 December 1951 221/345 GRANTOR: Albert L. Slonaker (Sloanaker) GRANTEE: Hugh G. and Naomi F. Slonaker -=450 acres on the west side of Route 522 --same property conveyed to grantors by Jesse R. Bailey et ux on 27 February 1912 and recorded in 133/453 (corrected 2 March 1914 in 136/100) --except two parcels, 4 acres and. 2 acres 2 March 1914 136/100 --Correction of 133/453. Deed should have conveyed 456'/ acres, not 474 acres •27 February 1912 133/453 GRANTOR: Jesse R. Bailey and Carrie B. Bailey. GRANTEE: Albert L. Slonaker --All those certain tracts or parcels of land with buildings and improvements 5%2 miles from Winchester along the Winchester and Front Royal Road (Route 522), totaling 476 acres --First: 474-acre tract with buildings and improvements, conveyed to Jesse R. Bailey by Robinson Keyser et ux 10 May 1882 and recorded in 97/497 --Second: 2'/a acres along Front Royal Road conveyed to Jesse R. Bailey by James W. Bayliss et al. 7 April 1900 and recorded in 120/282 --Third: water rights 10 May 1882 — 97/497 • GRANTOR: Robinson and Elizabeth Keyser pill GRANTEE: Jesse R. Bailey --575 acres along the Winchester to Front Royal Turnpike, except: 10 acres east of the turnpike conveyed to Keyser by John J. Williams, E.H. Boyd, and Holmes Conrad on 13 December 1877, 129 acres conveyed by Keyser and wife to Sarnuel R. Smith on 8 April 1882 and recorded in 97/460 3 acres conveyed by Keyser et ux to W.A. Crawford 27 April 1882 and recorded in 97/43 8 13 December 1877 94/46 GRANTOR: John J. Williams, Holmes Conrad, and E.H. Boyd, special commissioners (?) GRANTEE: Robinson Keyser --Chancery case related to Alfred Parkins, deceased. Court appointed grantors to sell his property --Grantee obtained by submitting a private bid after an auction failed. Bid was $4,500 for 500 to 570 acres and landlord's share of 1877 corn crop and growing crop of wheat --Tract is along Opequon Creek, five miles from Winchester, a portion of what Parkins owned at his death, and it contained his house. Tract adjoins a tract belonging to Parkins containing Frederick Mills and sold in chancery case to Alfred parkins Jr. but not yet conveyed to him --This sale is subject to water rights and rights of entry for repairing waterways belonging -to the mill and sold to said Parkins 23 July 1842 71/263 GRANTOR: Philip Williams, foreclosing on a deed of trust of the Sowers family • GRANTEE: Alfred Parkins --Purchase of a merchant's mill, a fulling mill, and other milling -related equipment, as well as an adjoining 150-acre tract with water rights on the Opecluon. (This could be the Artrip property) --Source: Garland R. Quarles, Some 01d Homes in Frederick County, Virginia (1990). According to Quarles, John Sowers obtained Parkins Mills in two purchases. These also might have included the Artrip property: --On 6 April 1779, James Knight sold 100 acres to Sowers, recorded in 18/129 --On 3 October 1789, James Knight's estate sold 116 acres to Sowers, recorded in 21/986 21 's 19 APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF PROJECT AREA 1 `jr. � XL _ ARTRIP-VA Excerpt from Varle's1809 Map of Frederick County, Virginia DATE: 5/03/04 PREPARED BY: BAS 0 0.5 1 O R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. MILES 241 East Fourth Street, Suite 100 Frederick, ME) 21701 • Figure 1. Excerpt from Varle's 1809 Map of Frederick County, Virginia r, • r � r i: OJI1, APPROXIMATE , O 5 LOCATION OF •ps j_ PROJECT AREA all -PG '4 nn ✓✓' �4� P �� •S,S• .. ,•�.••. •Jc00,L ,' aeL • . r t 1 i $ ,Yp ,1�.�►g II� GIR ' � •fro,• "�h,. �4�c� emu,• 3 � ..s�,,� ,';tea.: •' pr ....-.. ARTRIP-VA t•'��j°p i Excerpt from Lake's 1885 Atlas of + u+'+�r'F Dr ^�►. r'J►''o,. �' 1 Frederick Count , Vir inia Y g J' •:' DATE: 5/03/04 PREPARED BY: BAS - - - - • =ti•:,�'`+^� +�.o._.'�:i:' .-.:' • 0 }., p T�• 3000 R. Christopher Goodwin & Associates, Inc. FEET 241 East Fmnh Street, Sulte 100 Fred.rwk, Mn 21701 Figure 3. Excerpt from Lake's 1885 Atlas of Frederick County, Virginia g+i�j i 1i� 7m c y ri'r+ ��..'�, �e'� � T `t`y! sY.,•i,%.'f .+,�'asSt;�� ",��r� � \c � ( � � \ l ,� Y.- S�`K .l ��t t y - v 5. s �sy..-.�rr, Tr.3..0 •i'`.r s� �%- "I..� z k�-i, � �� '. yM. nq f .l ti � :t � � > w.f• � �.; 1:...i,,-I YJv�fff4r -.fir.: i ft �R t +� � e t 4 t ) kr v' f�i ri y \ ii. yflrjYr�x (�}'4�1.J.a�.ZiN7' r r}i 4 J +,71t1 ik k .rt� / �h� +-��r�Y�i� ��.,y�r�, •• �'r't yi, Y,�•}''^`-ii a.�?.,,t ih.{! �a�r g r q ;s�'i !'ie�.ti -gg ' '`[+-1Y.(, ' �{ °K i '.3t. �t �' •,t. ,i �,•si r� Pik! •.w. 3 ^t!d `•R`� r'P'R. •�. �.a� € -IL.K 1• �i i tti` a � �•4 .��. i- �r��%r k a�,�a��'� ��a�' �'i. �•�' "t"`l��dc "�':�(R�tt�;M K`�' 'K. �r `�► :' � ti. ._ p� �t �; - J dr-C,.�, � ! � '• R � 'ef 3i3'i �Fa t»ti,`� 7 E {fig °\S �LYa -- ,ft�v e��}h*,.xa. �-.� '` !} ���•�*7-'{ �1 ��in+-�C •'� 7- .. �1 tiF`ii�,r� ('� ,�• t,,, , c3` r. �,. a- •"- '�j' a .� ✓#• �'•,r a r�.li F' �+J+' � {�?3 "�1 '�'�t' ;r... �� F� t °4 '� .Yty L!`. s-'a .v� _�..iv-••H�`i. "av d�� {" ii!�iy rc a t •�¢ t6 �: � - �R�. The Villages atArtrip Rezoning Application, Impact Analysis Statement and Master Development Plan J APPENDIX E COMPREHENSIVE SIGN PACKAGE U U 0 • The Villages A.rtr.ip A Development of THE TOWER COMPANIES November 5, 2004 Comprehensive Sign Package P 1 : Gateway Identity Sign p : Primary Directional Sign p3 : Secondary Directional Sign (option A p4 : Secondary Directional Sign (option B) P5 : Tertiary Directional Sign p6 : Location Identity Sign p7 : Secondary Location Identity Sign (option A . p8 : Secondary Location Identity Sign (option B) p9 : Primary Village Identity Sign pl o: Secondary Village Identity Sign P 1 1 : Retail Tenant Signs p 1 : Multi -tenant Sign p 13: Proposed Informational Sign wood," Signs shown in this package are considered illustrative only. AiAll sign materials shall be comprised of one or more of the Tollowing materials : Brick, C� • GATEWAY IDENTITY SIGN 2' _ 0" MIN. �q, P.1 E • PRIMARY DIRECTIONAL SIGN 6 1-011 P.2 • u SECONDARY DIRECTIONAL SIGN MAX.FI 111L Option A • P.3 • 0 SIGN 'Long Term, ar n Slwrt: Term P ar king 'L o a din Option B • • TERTIARY DIRECTIONAL SIGN D.T; L, k-lF 0 0 LOCATION IDENTITY SIGN ,Vme4�ea at,A.-eno At, hi etic, P1 old's f, 2" -0" MIN. �l WN • • SECONDARY LOCATION IDENTITY SIGN OpTIoN A 0 P.7 SECONDARY LOCATION IDENTITY SIGN 4 it POST k--4 Option B • r] PRIMARY VILLAGE IDENTITY SIGN Artr" P w�wiHills -am Option A Option. B 0 P.9 0 0 0 SECONDARY VILLAGE IDENTITY SIGN 0 Retail Tenant Signs Vinyl Sig nape Projecting Sign Free Standing Signage All images on this page are illustrative and intend to convel P.1 1 9 MULTI -TENANT SIGN Building Address, UP tbl 6 (SV-. f eetY Major Tenlant'Name./Logo up Tenant Name s cru. f 0 b, Tenant Name • T� 11 9 A, J�kC At L U WU WO SIGN �i,icie, view Front View P.13