Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout033-90 Grace Brethren Church - Shawnee District - BackfileRECEIPT N2 022942 lb AMOUNT DUE $ 19,37. 63 AMOUNT PAID 3 7. o_3 BALANCE DUE PAID BY CASH CHECK 4 �� "'ttt❑"' OTHER -ILDL W NITY DEPT. OF PLANWIG AND DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 601 • 9 COURT SQUARE WiNCHL.3Ti-R, VIRGINIA 22601 • (703) 60-5651 DATE —_m RECEIVED FROM �r %Y�0 � �� " L,UA0� 1 `�' � 3 v ADDRESS THE SUM OF. % (/1.LGYii l! �GGLi.✓" �OLLARS $ FOR I SAY -TIMERS REORDER No. 3221 — Pnnted in USA SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The application is not complete if the following are not bresent: 641—w1. Two sets of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan; VDOT oK- 06 /(�o City of Winchester Co. San. Auth.-bK- 14/27hOy Co. Hlth. Dept. �J/C V Inspections Dept'OK' 09/90 Parks & Rec . tJ /C- Fire Marshall Airport Authority 2. 2 copies of the Site Plan application 3. 5 copies of the plan on a single sheet 4. 1 reproducible copy of the plan (if required) 5. a 35mm. slide of the plan (if required) * One copy of the application and comment sheets, two copies of the plan and the marked plans from the review agencies should be enclosed in a package which will be forwarded to the County Engineer. TRACKING DATE to g D Application Received q—bho Site Plan forwarded to Consulting Engineer Revi_. ro Z7 1V ew/Invoice received from Engineer Fee Paid (amount $ ) Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required) Final Site Plan submitted with review agency, Planning Commission, and staff comments addressed. Ark �0o�5 1-0 ace o me 33- 90 RALPH C. HALL, PE, RA Architect & Professional Engineer Novembe_ 13, 1990 Egan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Grace Brethren Site Plan No. 17555.090 Dear Mr. Wyatt, Several days ago I received a copy of Donohue Engineers' letter to you relative to final approval of the above referenced project. I assume that this was intended to remind me to make the revisions which they pro- posed pertaining to the stormwater drainage. At about the same time I received the stormwater plan from t1r. Ebert. I have been authorized to proceed with the construction drawings for the proposed building and I have been developinq them for the past two months. Upon receipt of the stormmwater plan I have now revised the drainage elevations to facilitate the flow of water and added the reten- tion pond as Mr. Ebert has shown it. In summary these are the revisions made in the spot elevation grades. The main floor level of the building has been raised 1 ft.; the catch basin inlet has been lowered 2 ft.; the swale which is in the center of the row of parking directly west of the building is the low point of the parking area and this swale slopes about 4 ft. in approximately 190 ft. The parking and drives on either side slope to this swale. This is a slope of over ;" per foot which on a paved surface should be adequate. As far as the drainage from VA Route 656 there is a high point at the center of the entrance drive which will separate the flow so that any water generated in the State road will continue down the riqht of way ditch the same as at the present time. Water on site will flow in a southeasterly direction to the catch basins and be piped via the 18 " storm sewer down to the detention pond. I understood that Mr. Ebert had already provided the required stormwater design and that he had submitted it directly), to you. Is this true? Are you requiring that a complete qradinq plan be prepared with construction spot elevations to be prepared by me? I am continuing to develop the construction drawings but it will be about the first of next year or later before these will be finished and for review. The Church is anticipating possible construction s etime early in 1991 so I am working toward that schedule. v; .'.� 1990 Very truly yours , Ralp HallI �� 11 Heritage Lane, Bradenton, FL 34209 (813) 792-6051 h • • October 19, 1990 Mr. Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 9 Court Square P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 it Re: Grace Brethren Church ENGINEERS 17555.090 ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS Dear Evan: I have received a submission from Allen Ebert regarding Items B5, B6, B7, and C of my review letter dated June 27, 1990. In response to his comments on the aforementioned letter and to the comments I made in my review letter of July 30, 1990, I have the following suggestions: A. GRADING AND DRAINAGE: 1. I understand that Mr. Hall of Ralph Hall Architects will be addressing the primary grading issues of my previous letters. This still needs to be done, particularly in relation to the grading to take place in front of the Church building. B. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT POND: 1. I have not yet been able to determine the proposed method for constructing the "pond" structure. From the information, it appears to be a structure that would be made out of concrete, particularly in the configuration of the dam structure. There is no way a weir as shown in the calculations can be built in an earthen structure. Also, the sideslopes for the exterior face of the dam and interior walls of the "pond" are too steep to be stable. I recommend a maximum of 3 to 1 on the face of the dam. I will not recommend approval of a weir or emergency spillway down the face of a dam unless it is concrete, grouted rip -rap or some other stable material. It appears to me that for the pond, natural contouring could be used more easily with just the addition of a dam structure (earthen) with appropriate sideslopes and the spillway in a cut area around the outside of the filled dam section. 2. I do not have any problem with the indicated sizing of the "pond" volume or primary discharge calculations. However, I feel that the emergency spillway, which will have to be designed based on the flow volume and velocities to be stable, will need to be sized to carry ■ 11240 Wples Alill Ruud Fvirfu. Viri�iniu 22030 703. 385. 3566 Te'lefiir 703.385.8319 • • r ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS both on -site drainage and off -site drainage. A drainage area map was not provided with the calculations so I cannot evaluate the total runoff volume through this facility. In referencing the USGS Map, it appears that the drainage area is small but it looks larger than the area of this site. The spill will have to be able to safely pass the runoff from the 100-year storm without overtopping the dam unless it is concrete and designed to handle the overflow. 3. It again is not clear to me how a contractor is going to build the pond. Unless the design calculation package is made a part of the construction plan and profiles, there are no details, profiles, typical sections, materials specified, etc. with which to build this. After construction, this facility would most likely not resemble what the plan intends. Again, it would be easier to use the natural contour as shown with an appropriate dam design to accomplish the intended goal. I do not feel that the additional weir is necessary. There is no need to reach exactly the pre -developed flow discharge. If the discharge rate is less than allowed and as a result more volume is stored, the facility will be of added benefit. Adequate volume appears to be available in the natural grades. C. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION: 1. Provided the off -site drainage is not too great, I do not have a major problem with the proposed E&S plan using silt fences. If flows are too great, silt traps and diversion berms may be required in lieu of silt fences. In closing, it would be more productive if Mr. Ebert and Mr. Hall would coordinate their submissions so that it comes as a complete package. It is difficult to review the individual items when the plans are so interrelated. The above items still need to be addressed before I can recommend final approval. If either party has questions or does not understand my comments, I am more than willing to meet with them and discuss my concerns in detail. I feel that these conditions and comments can easily be resolved. Since , DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES,/INC. Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB:mb cc: Allen Ebert Ralph Hall 0 11240 Waples Mill Road ENGINEERS Suite 100 ARCHITECTS Fairfax, Virginia 22030 SCIENTISTS 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Grace Church - September/October Submission Date: Oct.19, 1990 Please Reference: Project No. 17555.090 Invoice No. 9008033 Client No. 07534 Principal .5 hrs @ 48.00 24.00 Project Manager 1.5 hrs @ 33.25 49.88 Senior Engineer 2.0 hrs @ 33.25 66.50 Admin. Assist .5 hrs @ 14.50 7.25 Total Direct 147.63 Total Indirect 221.44 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE $ 369.07 , W. 101,01go C, ,4Yk �l� ;t� COUNTY of FR ICI: I:ICK I)C1lartnlcnt ol, [' mI11111", and De%-C1oJ)11lrnt 703 065-5651 I=,,\ \ 703 007-0370 August 2, 1990 Mr. & Mrs. Lonnie Barham Route 7 Box 72 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Grace Brethren Church Site Plan. Dear Mr. & Mrs. Barham: This letter regards the proposed site development for Grace Brethren Church. The review of this project was begun in April, 1990 and has progressed steadily since then. I have worked closely with Mr. Ernie Smith, and Mr. Ralph Hall throughout the review process, and feel comfortable with the progress of this plan to date. Mr. Smith informed me that the approval of this site plan is necessary in order for the church to finalize the purchase of this property. I informed Mr. Smith at our last meeting that I would send you a letter regarding this matter. All aspects of the site plan have been resolved with the exception of an engineer review pertaining to grading and drainage. Mr. Hall has been working with our engineer to resolve this matter which should be complete within the next week to two weeks. This site plan will be approved within the above mentioned time frame; therefore, I would recommend that the details of land acquisition be worked out now. This letter reflects the County's position for the approval of this project. I hope this letter is beneficial to both you and the members of the church. If I may answer any questions regarding this site plan, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, A T� Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW 9 COUI-t SCluarC - P.O. Box 601 - Winnccstcr. Vi1-Linia - 22hOI July 30, 1990 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 rr Winchester, VA 22601 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS Re: Grace Brethren Church Site Plan No. 17555.090 SCIENTISTS Dear Evan, I received a letter dated 7/3/90 from Ralph Hall in res- ponse to our previous comments (copy attached). We have reviewed the letter and revised site plan as submitted and offer the following comments: ACCESS TO THE SITE Most of the previous comments have been responded to. It sounds as if the Engineer has satisfied VDOT regarding the sight distance issue. I do not have any verification at this time so I can't make a personal recommendation but will have to rely on VDOT's judgement. Regarding Mr. Hall's response number 3-A about the future widening, I will rely on your judgement. The road will need to be widened in the future and adequate right-of-way will be needed. GRADING Although some of my comments were addressed regarding the proposed grading of the lot, stormwater management revisions and grading details by Allen Ebert must be incorporated before I can recommend approval on this issue. A drainage area map will need to be provided. I still am not clear on the drainage in front of the Church. According to Mr. Hall's response, drainage is intended to flow to the south toward the proposed inlet. The plans do not reflect this by spot elevation or contour. Since these plans are to be the blueprint for construction, I recommend they indicate the way the contractor is to grade the site in order to make the drainage work as intended. rr, ■ 11240 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Telefax 703.385.8319 i D o 6 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS The 660 contour line down the center of the parking lot indicates a flat grade which will not allow for water flow. This still needs to be resolved. DRAINAGE We reviewed drainage and stormwater management cal- culations and plans from Al Ebert July 20th. Our review continued with the following: Our initial comments regarding the pond design details still hold. Enough detailed information will have to be shown on the grading and drainage plan such as: - Inverts and length of the 8 inch culvert pipe - Type of pipe used - Design calculation of the discharge structure or pipe - Details of the pond shaping to be built by the cont- ractor The stage discharge elevation- discharge table or curve is not attached to the calculation to help check the routing table. Since an 8 inch culvert pipe is proposed we assume it to be a C.M.P. pipe. BPR culvert numagraphs for pipe design pipe is not included in the VDOT Design Manual for 8 inch pipe, therefore, another method is required. We do not agree with the use of the orifice formula (Q = Ca 2gh) since it does not take into consideration any friction losses through the pipe and headwater elevation is referenced from the centroid of the pipe. At the lower water elevations, the entrance would work under the Wier Formula. For this reason we have attached a SCS Pipe flow chart (Table 1.269a of Section 1.26 Virginia Erosion & Sedimentation Control Handbook) to be used to determine the outflow discharges. Kindly re -write the 2 year and 10 year storm to determine the allowable depth of storage. A drainage divide plan needs to be provided and the cal- culations of the on -site drainage divide shown to clarify how the 10 year discharges for each structure were cal- culated. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL The E & S control plan clearly including a narrative and sequence of installation, maintenance and removal of erosion control measures will be provided and reviewed. Silt fence is required on detention pond to control the south the silt eastern side near the entering the pond, or the pond can be used as a temporary sedimentation basin. © ©p oU' ENGINEERS The narrative will need to indicate how the pond would be + ARCHITECTS re -converted for SWM when complete. _J SCIENTISTS A legend indicating the meaning of the abbreviations such as CE, CF will need to be provided on E & S plan. Inlet protection is required at any and all catch basins to be constructed. Sincerely, DO,P�OHUE,&� ASSOCIATES I C. 1 / Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB/j la enclosure cc: Ralph Hall Allen Ebert file:fredco/17555.090/AAO Table 1.26a PIPE FLOW CHART n = 0.025 1.0 AND 70 FEET OF CORRUGATED NATAL PIPE CONDUIT (full flow assumed) Note correction factors for pipe lengths othe_ than 70 feet diameter of pipe in inches H, in feet 1 2 3 4 5 6" 0.33 0.47 0.56 0.67 0.74 8"__ 0.70 0.99 1.22 1.40 1.57 10"_ 1.25 1.76 2.16 2.49 2.79 _ 12" 1.98 2.80 3.43 3.97 4.43 15" 3.48 4.92 6.02 6.96 7.78 18" 5.47 7,74 9..48 10.9 12.2 21" 7.99 11.3 13.8 16.0 17.9 24" 11.0 15.6 19.1 22.1 24.7 30" 18.8 26.6 32.6 37.6 42.1 36" 28.8 40.8 49.9 57.7 64.5 42" 41.1 58.2 71.2 82.3 92.0 48" 55.7 78.8 96.5 111 125 54" 72.6 103 126 145 162 60" 91.8 130 159 184 205 66" 113 160 196 226 253 72" 137 194 237 274 306 78'___ 163 231 282 326 365 _ 84" 191 271 331 383 428 90" 222 314 384 444 496 96" 255 360 441 510 570 102" 290 410 502 580 648 6 7 8 9 10 0.82 0.86 0.94 1.00 1.05 1.72 1.86 1.99 2.11 2.22 3.05 3.30 3.53 3.74 3.94 4.86 5.25 5.61 5,95 6,27 8.52 9.20 9.84 10.4 11.0 13.4 14.5 15.5 16.4 17.3 19.6 21.1 22.6 24.0 25.3 27.0 29.2 31.2 33.1 34.9 46.1 49.8 53.2 56.4 59.5 70.6 76.3 81.5 66.5 91.2 101 109 116 123 130 136 147 158 167 176 178 192 205 218 230 225 243 260 275 290 277 300 320 340 358 336 362 388 411 433 399 431 461 489 516 469 506 541 574 605 544 587 628 666 702 624 674 721 764 806 710 767 820 870 917 11 12 13 14 15 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.29 2.33 2.43 2.53 2.63 2.72 4:13 4.32 4.49 4.66 4.83 6.58 6.87 7.15 7.42 7.68 11.5 12.1 12.6 13.0 13.5 18.2 19.0 19.7 20.5 21.2 26.5 27.7 28.8 29.9 30.9 36.6 38.2 39.8 41.3 42.8 62.4 65.2 67.8 70.4 72.8 95.6 99.9 104 108 112 136 142 148 154 159 185 193 201 208 216 241 252 262 272 281 304 318 331 343 355 376 392 408 424 439 454 475 494 513 531 541 565 588 610 631 635 663 690 716 741 736 769 800 830 860 845 883 919 953 987 962 1004 1045 1085 1123 16 17 18 19 20 1.33 1.37 1.41 1.45 1.49 2.81 2.90 2.98 3.06 3.14 4.99 5.14 5.29 5.43 5.57 7.93 8.18 8.41 8.64 8.87 13.9 14.3 14.8 15.2 15.6 21.9 22.6 23.2 23.9 24.5 32.0 32.9 33.9 34.8 35.7 44.2 45.5 46.8 46.1 49.4 75.2 77.5 79.8 82.0 84.1 115 119 120 126 129 165 170 174 179 184 223 230 236 243 249 290 229 308 316 325 367 378 389 400 410 453 467 480 494 506 548 565 581 597 613 652 672 692 711 729 765 789 812 834 856 888 915 942 967 993 1019 1051 1081 1111 1139 1160 1195 1230 1264 1297 21 1.53 3.22 5.71 9.09 15.9 25.1 36.6 50.6 86.2 132 188 255 333 421 519 628 747 877 1017 1168 1329 o 0 fD FOR CORRUGATED METAL PIPE INLET Ku - Ke + Kb - -' ` � co CD C N CT A 1 N C7 • N I V •A • fJ CJ1 I Do 0 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS 0 11240 Waples Mill Road Suite 100 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Grace Brethren Church Site Plan Prinicpal Project Manager Engineer Admin Assist .5 hrs 3.0 hrs 12.0 hrs .5 hrs @ 48.00 @ 33.25 @ 19.90 @ 14.50 Total Direct Total Indirect TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE 0 Date: July 30, 1990 Please Reference: Project No. 17555 .090 Invoice No. 9006342 Client No. 07534 24.00 99.75 238.80 7.25 369.80 554.70 $924.50 pp" 10 RUL- f ]Aq0 I Gt aCc FRAL_[-" C. HALL., PE, RA Architect & Professional Engineer July 3, 1990 Donohue & Associates 11240 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, Virginia 22030 Attention: Mr. Paul A. Bernard, PE, Project Manager Re: Grace Brethren Church, Site Plan # 17555.090 Dear Sir: I have received the letter which you sent me a copy of your letter to Mr. Evan Wyatt, Planner for Frederick County, regarding the above refer- ence project. I offer the following comments and explanations: A. Access To Site 1. This has been worked out with VA DOT and the site distances shown are those specified by VA DOT who did check the site and determine that with the 35 mph speed limit which has been set and posted is approved. The existing contours are those shown by the surveyor on the topographical survey furnished to me. 2. The parking lot has been increased to meet the recently adopted ordinance requiring a ratio of 1/3 for the required parking. 3. The Owners have informed me that the future right-of-way widening has already been planned by the County and that the widening is planned to occur along the west side of Rt. 656 and that none is planned along the side next to the church property but that the right-of-way shown is to be the future R/W line. I was unable to personally check this item. B. Drainage and Grading 1. The southern parking lot has been enlarged to provide the new required amount of 1/3 and the contours changed so that it is more uniformly graded and not as steep. Slopes vary from 1/12 to most of them are 1/15 to 1/20 which are rather gentle slopes consider - the slopes of the surrounding area and should be satisfactory. 2. The northern parking lot naturally slopes toward the Church building so the plan is developed to utilize the natural contours as much as possible. The low -point is a swale at elevation 660 and is planned to drain south ta_a catch basin in the island where the.,two drives intersect. The building floor plan is at 662 so that the drive drains to the midpoint of the double (front to front) parking area and then south to the catch basin. The intent is for all of drainage from the drive and parking area west of the building to be drained to this catch basin and piped beyond the paved areas and discharge to the detention pond. Mr. Allen Ebert is preparing the design for the drainage and stormwater detention pond. 6611 Heritage Lane, Bradenton, FL 34209 (613) 792-6051 Donohue & Associates Page 2, July 3, 1990 2. Continued, Drainage north of the parking and drive and north of the building will be allowed to follow the existing natural course down over the hillside to the existing ravines. The sidewalk next to the building will form a curb however, the drainage is to be directed away from this passenger discharge area to the 660 swale to the west. 3. I have revised the contours at the North of the parking lot and;added the 658 contour which was inadvertantly omitted. 4. I want to wait until the drainage plan for the stormwater design is completed before putting final spot elevations. This site plan was originally started and intended to be a conceptual plan but as the approval stage has progressed more and more items have been requested until it is becoming the construction drawings. The building plans are still in the conceptual stage and may necessitate some final revisions in spot elevations so please allow me to add these later. Items 5, 6, and 7, as well as C,.the Erosion and Sediment Control plan are being prepared by Pair. Allen Ebert, P.L.S. I trust this will care for the items that I plan to furnish. Very truly yours, Ralph Hall, PE, RA Professional Engineer & Architect cc: Mr. Evan Wyatt, Planner, Frederick Co. Mr. Allen Ebert, PLS Mr. Ernie Smith, Grace Brethren Church COMMONWEALTH of VIRQ11N:IA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 July 2, 1990 Mr. Ralph C. Hall, P.E., R.A. 6611 Heritage Lane Bradenton, FL 34209 Dear Mr. Hall: Ref: Propos Grace LIAM H. BUSMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER �10" Watermain rethren Church #0 33 - 7 C Route 656 Frederick County This is to acknowledge receipt of the above referenced project's site plan dated June 19, 1990. Upon review the submitted plan appears satisfactory and is therefore approved. Please advise the church board prior to any work on the State's right-of-way they will need to coordinate with the Frederick County Sanitation Authority for application and issuance of the necessary VDOT land use permit to cover said work. In order to issue said perrut I will require one (1) additional set of the site plan. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if I can be of further assistance, do not hesitate to call. RBC/rf xc: Mr. R. L. Moore Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. John Whitacre Sincerely, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer 1 By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior JUL TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY RALPH C. HALL, PE, RA Architect & Professional Engineer June 29, 1990 County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 9 Court Square, P. O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Planner I Re: Site Plan Review for Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA Dear Mr. Wyatt: I have revised the site plan for the above referenced project to increase the required parking to comply with the new requirements adopted by the February 14, 1990 revision to the local ordinance as indicated in your letter to me dated June 26, 1990. The latest revised floor plans, which are just in the schematic stage, ok provide for 525 seats including the balcony. This seating would require total parking of 175 spaces so this is what I have used. Also I have used 7 handicapped parking spaces which should meet the requirements. Cacc' J- The stormwater drainage design and the erosion an4 sediment control plans are being developed by a local engineering firm which should be ready for review soon. I suggest that the temporary construction en- trance be included on these same plans. I have received the letter from the Fire Marshall relative to the matter of whether or not the church would be required to be sprinkled. Earlier when I discussed it with his office they indicated that it may not be re- quired. I plan to be in Winchester sometime in July and plan to make an appointment to discuss this item with those concerned when I am there. It may be possible to divide the building with proper fire walls to meet the requirements. When this item is determined then we can determine whether to provide the additional hydrant or the firelane as you noted. The building plans for construction have not been developed as yet and are still in the schematic stage. We need to receive approval for the site plan subject to revisions as above in order for the church to fin- alize the purchase of this property so we are anxious to accomplish the items to be able to do this as soon as possible. Thank you for your help in processing this approval. Very truly yours, e- Ralph C. Hall, PE, RA 6611 Heritage Lane, Bradenton, FL 34209 (813) 792-6051 j June 27, 1990 Evan Wyatt, Planner Department of Planning & Development Frederick County 9 Court Square ENGINEERS P.O. Box 601 ARCHITECTS Winchester, Va 22601 SCIENTISTS RE: Grace Brethren Church Site Plan #17555.090 Dear Evan, I have reviewed the above site plan as submitted by Ralph Hall, P.E. There are several items I feel need to be clarified prior to my recommendation for approval. My comments are as follows: A. Access To Site 1. It appears that they have provided the information as requested by VDOT to satisfy them of sight distance requirements. This information was not provided to me and therefore I am unable to verify vertical sight distance from the south-west where there is an apparent "high point" based on the plan at approximately 150 feet south of the entrance. This high point could create a sight distance problem. 2. Traffic flow on site appears good. 3. It appears that the existing right-of-way in Rt. 656 is approximately 44 feet. The site plan as shown is at a key location with the intersection to Route 7. Future lane widening and possible turn lanes will be needed. I would suggest that the site plan allow for additional right-of-way dedication along its frontage of Rt. 656. I would recommend a minimum allowance of 30 feet from centerline. B. Drainage and Grading 1. The proposed grading for the southern parking lot is to steep along the western edge. It JUN 2 9 could be more uniformly graded to accomplish ■ 11240 Waples Mill Mmil Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Telef a 703. 385.83/9 I "(; IN[ I( R S :art:ur�r� 1 (IF NI IS7 ti the same general scheme. 2. The Northern parking lot has the drainage directed to the Church building. It is not clear based on the plan provided how the drainage will be diverted around the building and toward the stormwater detention pond. Curb and Gutter along the front of the building sidewalk would be helpful, however consideration should be given to the spread of water where people may be let off or where people would walk up to the sidewalk from the parking lot. 3. The contour ties at the North end of the parking lot need to be revised. The 658 contour has been omitted. 4. Additional spot elevations are needed to make it more clear as to how the designer intends drainage to flow. The pond as indicated on the plan does not have enough detail or information to review or build. The following will be needed as a minimum: a) Grading showing both existing and proposed contours b) Pond dam section and profile c) Designed discharge details and profile d) Design calculation of the discharge structure or pipe 66 The calculations for the pond are not based on real pond conditions. The designer will need to know the proposed and or existing parameters in order to establish and Elevation -Storage table or curve and an elevation -discharge table or curve. It appears that all of the calculations are based on hypothetical conditions. At the least, a pond will have to be detailed meeting the parameters of the hypothetical calculations. C I do not totally follow the calculations. The pond discharge for both the 2 year and 10 year storm event exceed the peak allowable discharge as indicated on page 1 of the calculations. Also, the volume and time of storage relationship as indicated on the 10 year storm hydrograph is not clear to me. �C) Erosion and Sedimentation Control 1. Proposed measures for erosion and sedimentation controls are needed for this site. Please reference the Virginia Erosion and Sedimentation Control Handbook for the appropriate measures that should be included on this plan. The above items need to be addressed before I can recommend approval of this plan. I am willing to meet D o o U ENGINEERS with the designer to discuss this further. Please let me know if this is necessary and we can arrange a ARCHITECTS suitable schedule. SCIENTISTS Sincerely, D ohue Assoc' s Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB:jm cc: Ralph Hall, P.E. Allen Ebert, P.L.S. 0 11240 Waples Mill Road ENGINEERS Suite 100 ARCHITECTS Fairfax, Virginia 22030 SCIENTISTS 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Dept. 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Va. 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Grace Brethern Church Site Plan No. 17555.090 Principal Project Manager Sr. Engineer Admin. Assist. Date: June 27, 1990 Please Reference: Project No. 17555.090 Invoice No. 9004912 Client No. 07534 .5 hrs @ 48.00 24.00 3.0 hrs @ 33.25 99.75 4.0 hrs @ 33.25 133.00 1.0 hrs @ 14.50 14.50 Total Direct 271.25 Total Indirect 406.88 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE $ 678.13 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/667-0370 June 26, 1990 Mr. Ralph C. Hall 6611 Heritage Lane Bradenton, FL 34209 Dear Mr. Hall: I have finished my initial review of the Grace Brethren Church site plan that was submitted to our department June 191 1990. The overall concept of this plan is designed well; however, there are revisions that are necessary for plan approval. First is the parking for this project. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (adopted February 14, 1990) requires churches to provide 1 parking space per 3 seats. Based on 505 seats in the sanctuary, the required amount of parking spaces is 169. Six of the 169 parking spaces need to be handicapped parking spaces. Another concern with this project regards the lack of erosion and sediment control measures. This project needs to reflect the requirements of the Virginia Erosion and Sedimentation Control Handbook, 2nd edition. A temporary construction entrance needs to be provided for this project as well. The last comment I have regards the comments made by the Fire Marshal. If the church is going to be sprinkled, there must be an additional fire hydrant added to this site to be dedicated to that system. If not, you still need to provide a marked fire lane for the proposed fire hydrant. I must still wait for our engineer to finish his review for this project; however, if his comments are favorable and the revisions I specified are complete, I will recommend approval for this project. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 1 Evan A. Wyatt, Planner I 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 AW G Application for a Site Plan Complete the following application: Development's Name: Grace Brethren Church Location of Property: Va. Rt. 656 at Va. Rt. 7 (by street names) Winchester, Va. DATE April 3, 1990 Application # U3 i Property Owner's Name: Grace Brethren Church Address: 645 Berryville Avenue - _Wi.nrhPsfLnr, VA 22601 Telephone: 703/662-6360 Applicant/Agent: Mr. Ernie Smith Address: 400 Kern Street Winrhesfi-r., VA 226Q1 Telephone: 703/662-0487 Designer/Design Co.: Ralph C. Hall, PE, RA Address: 6611 Heritage Lane Bradenton, FL 34209 Telephone: 813/792-6051 . Contact: Mr. Ralph C. Hall Total Area of Property: 22.600 4 r a 5CX-13 -- Acc ocx3o cocc -- ou7y _ 0 Tax Map Number: 55=--/too -- eec;e - 01g00 - W'7`1 - C Parcel Number: 7- ; 7`� Property Zoning and Present Use: RA - Rural Area, residential Adjoining Property Zoning and Present Use: RA, Rural Area - residential Proposed Uses: Facilities for worship and related church activities Magisterial District: Shawnee 5 Application for a Site Plan Complete the following application: Development's Name: Grace Brethren Church Location of Property: Va. Rt. 656 at Va. Rt. 7 (by street names) Wind) -ester, Va. DATE April 3, 1990 Application Property Owner's Name: Grace Brethren Church Address: 645 Berryville Avenue Wins-hestPr. VA .29601 Telephone: 703/662-6360 Applicant/Agent: Mr. Ernie Smith Address: 400 Kern Street Wiry-hactar, VA 2201 Telephone: 703/662-0487 Designer/Design Co.: Ralph C. hall, PE, RA Address: 6611 -Heritage Lane Bradenton, FL 34209 Telephone: 813/792-6051 Contact: Mr. Ralph C. Hall Total Area of Property: 22.600 4 Tax Map Number: SS000 q 00000oo00000-Igo Parcel Number: Lo.uzoe4 L. $oe µAm Property Zoning and Present Use: RA - Rural Area, residential Adjoining Property Zoning and Present Use: RA, Kral Area - residential Proposed Uses: Facilities for warship and related church activities Magisterial District: Shawnee 3 0 0 RALPH C. HALL., PE, RA Architect & Professional Engineer May 29, 1990 Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 9 Court Square, P. O., Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Site plan Submittal, New Church Facility Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA I am submitting herewith, the Site Plan Package for the above reference project. Mr. Ernie Smith, the Church's local representative will be hand delivering the package to your office. I have included the following: 1. One (1) original and one (1) copy of the comment sheets and marked prints from each of the agencies which you indicated that I should submit to in my preliminary conference. Previously you had indicated that the City of Winchester and the Airport Authority were not re- quired so none are included from them. I have furnished all of the items except the VDOT just requested construction drawings for the off -site water main extension which is still in preparation. Since this is off -site and does not per- tain to the site plan I have requested them to submit it later as soon as I have it completed. 2. Two (2) copies of the Site Plan Application 3. Five (5) copies of the plan on a single sheet. 4. One (1) reproducible copy of the plan (mylar) was already sent to the sanitation department as they requested. 5. A 35mm slide of the plan is enclosed. The Church needs to finalize the transfer of the ownership of the property from Mr. Barham to the Church and since the purchase agreement has a stipul- ation that the site plan be approved before transfer they are anxious to complete this arrangement. Therefore, will you separate the approval for the off -site water main extension and allow it to be approved later but before any construction is started. I need to have the surveyor prepare a plan and profile of the existing right-of-way where the water main will be installed. Arrangements have already been initiated for this to be done. Then as soon as I have this prepared I will submit the construction plans for the water main. Also the building plans have not progressed beyong the conceptual stage and all of the construction working drawings need to be prepared. If you can grant this regbm- st it will expedite all of this work involved. Thank you. { Very ly yours, Ralp C. Hall, PE, RA 6611 Heritage Lane, Bradenton, FL 34209 (813) 792-6051 ... i� CO COUNTY of FREDERI oa �j Department of Planning and DevelopE �i 703 / 665- `';'"' R_ EQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703/667- Virginia Department of Transportation ATTN: William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278, Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (703) 984-4133 The local office of the Transportation Department is located at 1550 Commerce Street, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. .Applicant's name, address and phone number: Grace Brethren Church 645 Berryville Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 Ph 703/662-6360 Name of development and/or description of the request: site plan review for proposed new facility at a new location for the Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA Location: VA Rt. 656 at VA Rt. 7 Transportation Departn+ent Comments: See attached letter from W. H. Bushman to Ralt)h C. Hall dated June 6, 1990. VDOT Signature and Date: A e< G Z �g o (NOTICE TO VDOT - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach THREE copies of your plans and/or application form. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER Mr. Ralph C. Hall, PE, RA 6611 Heritage Lane Bradenton, FL 34209 Dear Mr. Hall: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN (703) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER June 6,- 1990 Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance Grace Brethren Church Routes 7 & 656 Frederick Comity This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter and revised site plans dated March 29, 1990 to the above referenced project. The resubmitted plans appear satisfactory and are therefore approved. Please advise the owner accordingly. Before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way the appropriate land use permits must be applied for and issued to cover construction of the commercial entrance as well as off site watermain installation. These permits are issued by this office and require an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. As specified in your letter, all off site surveying associated with the proposed 10" watermain on the Route 656 right-of-way has not been ccapleted. Therefore, once this has been accomplished please submit four (4) copies of the plan and profile to this office for review and approval. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if I pan be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to call. RBC/rf Attach. xc: Mr. R. L. Moore Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. R. W. Watkins Sincerely, W. H. Bushman itesident �iti�iilet:Y By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd..Spec. Senior Y TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY RAILPH C. HALL!P E, RA Architect & Professional Engineer May 29, 1990 Mr. Robert B. Childress Virginia Department of Transportation P. O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824 Re: Proposed Entrance, Grace Brethren Church Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Childress: I have received your letter dated May 24, 1990 with the request to make the revisions indicated in that letter. I have made the following revisions listed 1, 2, & 3 in Your letter as follows: 1. I added the note indicated on the print you returned to me specifying removal of the fences, vegetation and embankments to obtain the minimum sight distance requirements. 2. I added the note specifying the speed limit and sight distances. 3. I added the note specifying that the existing drive be removed and blocked at the right-of-way. This was the plan anyone only to have the new entrance when used for the church. Also I have initiated work for the plan and profile for the construction of the water main along route 656. In order to complete this I need to have the surveyor survey the right-of-way involved amd give me the elevations of the existing conditions. I have requested this but it will be a short time until I can get that information and complete the construction drawings. As soon as I have it finished I will forward copies to you. Since this is an off -site utility extension and the church needs to finalize the transfer of the property from Mr. Barham to the Church which was made subject to receiving approval of the site plan I want to request that the site plan itself be approved so that this can proceed. Then in the meantime I will provide the construction plan and profile drawings for the water main extension and any construction either for the building or the water main will not be started until final approval for the water main is received. Plans for the building itself have not proceeded beyond the schematic plan stage and these also need to be developed before any construction would be started. If you can approve allowing the Church to file with the County for site plan approval contingent upon later submission of the water main construction plans as indicated this will be greatly appreciated by all. Thank you for your consideration. Very truly yours, � �r Rat C. HZal PE, RA 6611 Heritage Lane, Bradenton, FL 34209 (813) 792-6051 • • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-56591 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703/667-0370 Frederick County Inspections Department AT1'N: Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director P.O. Boa 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5651 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court Square in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Grace Brethren Church 645 Berryville Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 1'11 703/G6'-636i) Name of development and/or description of the request: —_ site plan review for proposed new -facility at a new location for the Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA Location: Va. Rt. 656 at VA Rt. 7 Inspections Department Comments: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 302.0 Use Group A, ASSEMBLY USES of the 1987 BOCA National Building Code. ,a 11 A_ Inspect. Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO !CANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 7031665-565P 4 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703 / 667-0370 Frederick -Winchester Health Department ATTN: Herbert L. Sluder, Sanitation Engineer P.O. Box 2056, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 667-9747 The Frederick -Winchester Health Department is located at the intersection of Smithfield Avenue and Brick Kiln Road, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Grace Brethren Church 645 Berryville Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 Ph 703/662-6360 Name of development and/or description of the request: site plan review for the proposed new facility at a new location for the Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA Location: VA Rt. 656 at VA Rt. 7 Health Department Comments: Health Signature and Date: (NOTICE TO HEALTH DEPT. - NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • �e4G1 o COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAYD. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER May 24, 1990 Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance Mr. Ralph C. Hall, PE, RA & 10" Watermain Extension 6611 Heritage Lane Grace Brethren Church Bradenton, FL 34209 Routes 7 & 656 Frederick County Dear Mr. Hall: Upon review of the above referenced project's site plan dated April 12, 1990 please find our recommendations on the attached plans marked in red and as follows: 1. Existing fences, vegetation and embankments are to be removed adjacent to the entrance in order to obtain minimum sight distance requirements. 2. The speed limit, reference and existing sight distances are to be added to the site plan as noted. 3. The existing private drive which is currently serving the dwelling on the property is to be removed or blocked at the right-of-way line. 4. Additional detail will be required concerning the proposed 10" watermain extension on the Route 656 right-of-way. The main should be clearly referenced from both the edge of pavement and right-of-way line as well as a profile included of its entire length. For your use I have also enclosed a b/w print of our construction plans for the intersection of Routes 7 and 656 which you may find helpful. Please revise and resubmit eight (8) copies for final approval. Should any changed be deemed necessary please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf Attachments xc: Mr. R. L. Moore, Mr. J. B. Diamond, Mr. R. W. Watkins, Mr. John Whitacre, Mr. Ernie Smith TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY E Mr. Ralph C. Hall, PE, RA 6611 Heritage Lane Bradenton, FL 34209 Dear Mr. Hall: (703) 984-4133 May 24, 1990 25 Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance & 10" Watermain Extension Grace Brethren Church Routes 7 & 656 Frederick County Upon review of the above referenced project's site plan dated April 12, 1990 please find our recommendations on the attached plans marked in red and as follows: 1. Existing fences, vegetation and embankments are to be removed adjacent to the entrance in order to obtain minimum sight distance requirements. 2. The speed limit, reference and existing sight distances are to be added to the site plan as noted. 3. The existing private drive which is currently serving the dwelling on the property is to be removed or blocked at the right-of-way line. 4. Additional detail will be required concerning the proposed 10" watermain extension on the Route 656 right-of-way. The main should be clearly referenced from both the edge of pavement and right-of-way line as well as a profile included of its entire length. For your use I have also enclosed a b/w print of our construction plans for the intersection of Routes 7 and 656 which you may find helpful. Please revise and resubmit eight (8) copies for final approval. Should any changed be deemed necessary please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, W. H. Bushman Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf Attachments xc: Mr. R. L. Moore, Mr. J. B. Diamond, Mr. R. W. Watkins, Mr. John Whitacre, Mr. Ernie Smith • COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 6ZV' f�0&2 Date Received Date Reviewed Applicant Name Address la'4&- Project Name �� ��✓tom Phone No. 003-U412-1p3-1-0 Type of Application Current Zoning 1st Due Fire Co. i8 1st Due Rescue Co. 15 Election District �s✓f%'��/E'� RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Automatic Fire Alarm System X Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Residential Sprinkler System Other Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes No Comments : .fii Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate x— Inadequate Not Identified _ Special Hazards Noted; Yes x— No Comments' J�l.� �u•�JE2' �7Ev�io�✓ �w - `'�,✓��'�� n - Continued - • Hydrant Locations; Adequate _ Inadequate Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified _ X Additional Comments: /Z, /-6r -750 Rev i ew T i me Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal 0 COUNTY of FREDERIC Department of Planning and Developme 703/665-56 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703/667-03 Frederick County Sanitation Authority ATTN: Wellington Jones, Engineer/Director P.O. Box 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Grace Brethren Church 645 Berryville Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 Ph 703/662-6360 Name of development and/or description of the request: site planreview for proposed new facility at a new location for the Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA Location: Va. Rt. 656 at VA Rt. 7 Sanitation Authority Comments: A PPAo Ufa •�S Sli�.�'iTTfQ - f'oR /YiEa / G-4i'y of dLliF L i�i< DAi1 w��,L-J - /�-S�,Ecr-oR Sanit. Signature & Date: R O (NOTICE TO SANITATION - E RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach Two copies of your plans and/or application form. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Frederick County Sanitation41thority Post Office Box 618 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 Phone 665-5690 To _ � 0// <', i/4LL 4.9,406v TON A—L 3 y.? OF WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached C: Under separate cover via ❑ Shop drawings R�lCopy of letter ❑ Prints ❑ Change order [[:EUUA OF UGDRU00]0�`��0� DATE JOB NO, ATTENTION RE A [�t' Plans ❑ Samples the following items: Specifications COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION 411f0zy A� cT oN 4Q W/ t'S SiT,F P Co.sr.,y....Yr .EE THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below: ❑ For approval ✓Approved as submitted ❑ For your use ❑ Approved as noted ❑ As requested ❑ Returned for corrections ❑ For review and comment ❑ ❑ FOR BIDS DUE El Resubmit _copies for approval ❑ Submit copies for distribution ❑ Return corrected prints 19 Li PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US REMARKS %/y/c C�41ACV W14�466E0 to Jr,6Wo 7;Ve To C670A.-TY 01- 4,46VIA11- QF_=,* Z / W1_1 L A/fEa / COPY G/C AL!/,E L/ivy ARIAIrJ C- if I /I eom" S - F 04, -" <-o qo s C) COPY TO A-RNI,E W 5.01 7"y PRODUCT 2402 � Inc..0 IN Mm. 0IA71 SIGNED: If enclosures are not as noted, kind) if us at once. RA -PH C. HALL E, RA Architect & Professional Engineer May 4, 1990 Frederick County Sanitation Authority Post Office Box 618 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attention: Mr. John G. Whitacre RE: Grace Brethren Church Dear Mr. Whitacre: Please find enclosed the following copies: 1 - Blueline print of the site plan. 1 - Bluline print of the plan and profile for the entrance drive. 1 - Mylar copy of the site plan. 1 - Mylar copy of the plan and profile for the entrance drive. 1 - Copy of the request for site plan comments 1 - Copy of your letter of transmittal dated April 27, 1990 Thank you for your promptness in handling these matters. cc: Mr. Ernie W. Smith Pastor Richard Bell Sincerely, Ralph C. Hall, PE, RA r F ` 6611 Heritage Lane, Bradenton, FL 34209 (813) 792-6051 E • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS 703 / 665-56591 FAX 703 / 667-0370 Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department AT1'N: James Doran, Director P.O. Boa 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5678 The Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department is located on the second floor of the Frederick County Administration Building, 9 Court Square, Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Grace Brethren Church 645 Berryville Avenue, Winchester, VA 22601 Ph 703/662-6360 Name of development and/or description of the request: site plan review for proposed new facility at a ne�,a location for the Grace Brethren Church, Winchester, VA Location: VA Rt. 656 at VA Rt. 7 Parks & Recreation Department Comments: Parks Signature and Date: (NOTICE TO PARKS - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia - 22601 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. Date Received Si-4 %ODate Reviewed O Applicant Name Address 4o,4&- ev Project Name �s ��✓c Phone No. Type of Application Current Zoning 1st Due Fire Co. /& 1st Due Rescue Co. 1-5, Election District .��✓.�?%%✓�'� RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X— Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes �_ No Comments: Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate _x Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted; Yes x No Comments lz.7e✓iJc� - Continued - • to Hydrant Locations; Adequate -- Inadequate Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified _ X Additional Comments: 70 /!�/� /7�✓��,�A,vi lJ/Gf yi�flyE 70 Review Time Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal