Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout002-92 Hershey Pasta Group - Stonewall District - BackfileRECEIPT %'2 0 2 ')`3.19 AMOUNT DUE $ 3 PAID AMOUNT j IJ BALANCE DUE PAID BY CASH CHECK El OTHER F.-'.- E D P,, i -- "'; - - - I P.O. BOX 601, 9 COURT SQUfRE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 24601 RECEIVED FROM INNING AND DEVELOPMENT DATE 0/" ADDRESS V( THE SUM 0, DOLLARS By RECEIPT N2 023702 AMOUNT DUE (� AMOUNT PAID $,� BALANCE DUE I D PAID BY CASH E/CHECK' �u p' �"'� 7 3 OTHER Vim' FREDERICK COUNT"t' DCPT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT P. 0. BOX 601, 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 DATE�`- RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS THE SUM OF _ FOR By DAY -TIMERS RE -ORDER No. 3221 —Printed ;, USA t i 40 6 * STAFF SITE PLAN CHECKLIST * This application is not complete if the following are not included: f 1. One set of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan; V VDOT City of Winchester ✓Sanitation Authority X (PNIE Q) ✓Inspections Dept. x ( PA*5c 10 i�Fire MarshalX (PµA69 Jf-) County Engineer x ( POK -1T-) Airport Authority "_7,2. One copy of the Site Plan application. 3. Five copies of the Site Plan. 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required). Town of Stephens City Town of Middletown Health Dept. Parks & Recreation Soil & Water Conservation Dist. 5. One 35mm. slide of the Site Plan (if required). � P�►GK Sccsir 41°1-2.55 -�� TRACKING Date f -13 -9 Z Application received. All necessary agency comments received. " io/92, Fee Paid (amount $ • P-e, )000 a81N. D8' Site Plan to Planning Commission via bi-monthly. Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required). �evisions received (if required). 1647 Date of approval. _ Info added to annual report draft. i a� t � ,¢1CK �, • • Al COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA � z W a FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT FARE RESCUE 9 N. Loudoun Street, 2nd Floor VIRGINIA Winchester, Virginia 22601 Thomas W. Owens Director July IS, 1-993 Mil. er ivtillilig C--ompany Attn: Mr. Herbert Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Blinn _yap:;_ is , Minnesota 55415 Dear Mr. M-il ler , Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal _am wr l t li�� 111 I'�?531'C�iS �.4 �"iie �" Eire ilc_ti^i 417a 4 has been placed bt-]Low tine footers of the Warehouse/Office Building on your pro'Ject. At this point, I am told that the final disposition of this matte-1- lies with you, the building owner. At the site and in our offices, I have heard that the compacrion is being evaluated by an engineer and the building design is being checked by an engineer, etc. it also apt --ears that a lot t?f "finger pointing" is going on about who is at fault for this error. Regardless, I believe there is a aisnific.ant pr:_�blem with this arrangement as it currently stands. The engineering that is 'being done is no doubt focusing on whether tale di`ch line will adequately support the foundation, and also ensure the pipe is adequate' y protected. I personally don't :lave much faith in n"ml.ers that arise "after the fact" that say a mistake will work. I see a very real potential for this footing to settle in the future placing "point loading" on the 8" ductile iron fire main. Should this happen causing the pipe to fail, there is little doubt in my mind that the Warehouse Building will become a total loss. The 8" fire main is supplied by a massive fire pump capable of pumping 3000 gallons per minute at 175 PSI. In a matter of minutes the foundation would be undermined leading to severe strut-urai damage if not a tot -al ce:.lapse of the structure. Should the ;.wilding be occupied at the time, I feel there is a DIRECTOR - (703) 665-5618 FIRE MARSHAL - (703) 665-6350 FAX - (703) 678-0682 • or INii1 1e,r M 111 1 Z.ng L c;mr-)any r 19 rea chance of injury to personnel involved, aiid if not., i do feel you will lose this structure. This scenario would also put US withol_it fire protection to the Mill Building 1.u1-.il repairs are made. in speaking with Mr. Wya�,--t-, Frederick County Planning Dept. , I am -old that the approved revised, site plan on file with Frederick County shows this fire main relocated, away from the building . T1'1at. being the case, the [Main will have to be relocated prior to Occupancy Permits bein;?- issued. I hope this will assist you, in maIking decisions on this matter and T ' 11 hope "'ully Jae able to� 't a Cletin i to answer on whet is going to happen from the con`rac-.ors involved. Tf I can be of any further cis sist.ance, please don't- hesit.at.a to cali nee. Thank you for your attention in this matter, ' Re�spect:L �11�.1 v Douglas A. Niracofe Fire Marshal DAIS.: J lc cc: John Trenary, Building O"=ficial Evan Wyatt, Planning Dept. File COUNTY of FREDERI CK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 5401678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Kiracofe, Fire Marshal John Trenary, Building Official Boyd Pitcock, Plans Review Specialist H.E. Strawsnyder, Director of Public Works FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II ki RE: Hershey Pasta/Miller Milling Site Plan DATE: March 8, 1996 I have been asked to coordinate a meeting with each of you to discuss the above referenced project. It would be beneficial to have one meeting instead of individual meetings; therefore, I would like to reserve our conference room for Tuesday, March 12, 1996 at 10:00 p.m. Please advise me as soon as possible of your ability to attend this meeting. If you have a conflict, please inform me of a better day or time so I can coordinate with others. I have been asked to advise you not to discuss this project with others for competitive reasons. Thank you for your quick response to this memo. 107 North Dent Street o Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 COUNTY of FREDERICK i� Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 ��?;:< PLEASE Revs oJ aLA Fi March 25, 1996 � � ►' ED t T AND R ETU 2 n) Miller Milling Company asA<P . TH*FX you Attn: Herbert G. Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55415 RE: Miller Milling - Phase II and Phase III Dear Mr. Miller: I enjoyed the opportunity to meet with you to discuss future plans for development at the Miller Milling facility. As requested, I have met with the appropriate review agencies to inform €hem of your plans and to determine the issues that should be considered during site plan design. ofler the following comments: STa1RM WATER MANAGEMENT Fort Collier Industrial Park has worked with the County Engineer to develop a regional storm water management facility. This facility is designed to accommodate existing and planned development within the industrial park. The County Engineer feels that this facility will adequately accommodate the Phase II and Phase III construction proposed by Miller Milling, EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE All review agencies (the County Engineer, the Building Official, the Fire Marshal and mysek) agree that an as -built plat or plan should be prepared which provides information on the existing infrastructure and the previous construction. It is our belief that this information will elimina!%° any "guesswork" on the construction site and will ensure that construction is not delayed. This information will also provide a significant benefit to the design firm which will prepare your site plan. CODE REQUIREMENTS The site development plan will need to address the requirements of the Section 165, Zoning, from the Frederick County Code; Section 90, Fire Prevention, from the Frederick County Code; and Title 24 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page -2- 0, Miller Letter March 25, 1996 The structural plans will need to address the requirements of The BOCA National Building Code 1993 and the National Fire Prevention Code 1988, Section 1141. The Building Official feels that the proposed construction will fall under the Type 1, H-2 category as specified under Table 503, page 54, of the 1993 BOCA Code. However, the Building Official will need to receive construction design information and explosion relief information before he can determine the appropriate category. hi mlaiiffelMfmw The proposed Phase II development calls for the construction of a second mill and four additional silos. The proposed layout appears to be appropriate; however, this layout will require the fire lane and two fire hydrants to be relocated to the north. It should also be noted that the second mill will be required to be constructed with four hour rated exterior fire walls due to its proximity to the existing office/warehouse building. PHASE III PROPOSAL The proposed Phase III development calls for a third mill, four additional silos and a warehouse facility. This layout may create problems regarding emergency access, although the perimeter access drives may be appropriate if hydrant placement and emergency equipment staging areas are strategically located. This layout should be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. The most significant concern of either development phase is to ensure that these facilities are not constructed over existing or proposed utility lines. Plans need to indicate how existing utility lines will be abandoned, filled and relocated where this conflict occurs in the proposed phases. Frederick County will require a site plan to be approved prior to the construction of the Phase II improvements. This site plan can be reviewed "in-house" by the County Engineer, the Building Official, the Fire Marshal and myself, and approved administratively. Please share the information in this letter with your design team and advise them to contact any of our "in-house" review staff with questions. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Engineering Department Attn: Director of Engineering P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5643 The Frederick County Engineering Department is located at 9 North Loudoun St., 2nd Floor of the Hammon Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: SSOE, INC., 1001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43624 419-255-3830, Attention: Jay Lingnell Name of development and/or description of the request: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility Location: 540 Park Center Drive Ft. Collier -Industrial Park Winchester, VA 22601 Engineers Comments: The site plan submitted on January 21, 1992, is approved by the Engineering Department contingent upon the resolution of the attached contnents. Engineers Signature & Date: . 1Lq� 1117 )J. A �.j , (NOTICE TO ENGINEERING DEPT.+PLEASE ETURN THIS FO,/kH TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach two copies of your plans and/or application form. -13- \J COUNTY of FREDERICK Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering & Inspections 703/665-5643 FAX: 703/678-0682 FREDERICR COUNTY ENGINEER 9 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET, 2ND FLOOR WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 665-5643 SITE PLAN DATE: February 6, 1992 PROJECT: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility 540 Park Center Drive Fort Collier Industrial Park Frederick County, Virginia DESIGNER: Jay Lingnell SSOE, Inc. 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 COMMENTS 1) Submit designs and supporting hydrologic/hydraulic calculations for box culverts at Park Center Drive extended and at the railroad crossing. 2) Consider super elevating loop road at horizontal curves shown on Sheets C-33 and 34. 3) Construction joint detail indicates 5/8" and 1/2" deformed and smooth dowells, respectively. We recommend that the dowell size be consistent with the one (1) inch bar specified for the transverse/longitudinal joints. Also, the saw cut depth should be one -quarter the pavement thickness rather than one-third. LOA,)"- I' Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr P.E. &JA) Director of Engineering 9 North Loudoun St. - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 MAR— 7-95 TUE 11:47 FREDICK CO CT COMMONS 17036780682 P.03 i LAND DISMBING PERMIT ISSUED TO: - PERRY 7 who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick v County Department of Planning and Development. AGREEMENT This agreement, made this 21 sT day of NDVElBER 199, by and between party(s) of the first , y , part and the Count of Frederick , Virginia, party of the second part. Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for the PDn ICrT PADvrclr l' of (actual disturbed acres) and the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction and before final occupancy, the Party(s) of the first part or his heirs/assigns agree to do the following work: 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction and to provide for conformity with 'the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. MAR 07 '95 10:13 1703G780G82 PAGE.003 MAR- 7-95 TUE 11:47 FREDICK CO CT COMMONS 17036780682 P.02 j �z- The party (s) of the First part does further agree that an agent of Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in .the approved plan. In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. PERRY ENGINEERING CORPOPUkTION B Y : �!CJ Qivf gU' rt In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf by County of Frederick, Virginia l BY: [3 Freder County Department of Planning and Development NOTE: Issuance Of this permit does not constitute approval of a site. plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. MAR 07 195 10:13 170367eO682 PAGE.002 I *M MAR— 7-95 TUE 11:47 FREDICK CO CT COMMONS 17036780682 P. 01 k -3-- STATE' OF V'IRGINIA COUNTY Or FREDERICA I a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my said County, (name)SUSAN FRITCN Of (company) and _ IANw BisE, I L PLANNER I of the Frecrerick County Department and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated Novpcm 21, 1991 did personally appear before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this day of r 19� . Notary public My Commission expires on SEPT, 30, 1993 Al Post -It' Fax Note 7671 Date. pa9� To 1 nnoY_ From Co./Dept. Co. Phone S Phone n Fax K / ,. I — c6 Fax A r7c)3 -(Ori ' MAR 07 195 10:12 170367806e2 PAGE.001 COUNTY of FREDERICK I Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 July 1, 1993 Miller Milling Company Attn: Mr. Herbert G. Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Approval of Revised Miller Milling Site Plan Dear Mr. Miller: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved the revised Miller Milling Site Plan on June 30, 1993. The site plan was revised to indicate the relocation of the office/warehouse building and the relocation of the eight (8) inch fire main. Other improvements specified on this revised site plan include the construction of a truck scale, an asphalt parking lot complete with 22 regular parking spaces, one (1) disabled parking space that will be van accessible, curb and gutter, and parking lot landscaping, a fire lane that will be twenty (20) feet wide, and all appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. I have provided Mr. Harold Reynolds of Ibberson Engineering, Inc. with an approved copy of the site plan. This will allow the contractors to have an approved copy of the site plan on the construction site. Please have Mr. Reynolds contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection when all improvements are complete. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, I Evan A. Wyatt Planner II W-IM cc: Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor Michael A. Didawick, Director of General Reassessments Harold Reynolds, Ibberson Engineering, Inc. Paul C. Murphy, Ibberson Engineering, Inc. H. Bruce Edens, Greenway, Inc. 9 North Loudotin Slreet P.O. Box 601 Winchcstcr, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 March 28, 1996 Miller Milling Company Attn: Herbert G. Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55415 RE: Miller Milling - Phase II and Phase III Dear Mr. Miller: I enjoyed the opportunity to meet with you to discuss future plans for development at the Miller Milling facility. As requested, I have met with the appropriate review agencies to inform them of your plans and to determine the issues that should be considered during site plan design. I offer the following comments: STORM WATER MANAGEMENT Fort Collier Industrial Park has worked with the County Engineer to develop a regional storm water management facility. This facility is designed to accommodate existing and planned development within the industrial park. The County Engineer feels that this facility will adequately accommodate the Phase H and Phase III construction proposed by Miller Milling. EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE All review agencies (the County Engineer, the Building Official, the Fire Marshal and myself) agree that an as -built plat or plan should be prepared which provides information on the existing infrastructure and the previous construction. It is our belief that this information will eliminate any "guesswork" on the construction site and will ensure that construction is not delayed. This information will also provide a significant benefit to the design firm which will prepare your site plan. CODE REQUIREMENTS The site development plan will need to address the requirements of the Section 165, Zoning, from the Frederick County Code; Section 90, Fire Prevention, from the Frederick County Code; and Title 24 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability. 107 North Kent Street - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Page -2- Miller Letter March 28, 1996 The structural plans will need to address the requirements of The BOCA National Building Code 1993 and the National Fire Prevention Code 1988, Section 1141. The Building Official feels that the proposed construction will fall under the Type 1, H-2 category as specified under Table 503, page 54, of the 1993 BOCA Code. However, the Building Official will need to receive construction design information and explosion relief information before he can determine the appropriate category. PHASE II PROPOSAL The proposed Phase II development calls for the construction of a second mill and four additional silos. The proposed layout appears to be appropriate; however, this layout will require the fire lane and two fire hydrants to be relocated to the north. It should also be noted that the second mill will be required to be constructed with four hour rated exterior fire walls due to its proximity to the existing office/warehouse building. PHASE III PROPOSAL The proposed Phase III development calls for a third mill, four additional silos and a warehouse facility. This layout may create problems regarding emergency access, although the perimeter access drives may be appropriate if hydrant placement and emergency equipment staging areas are strategically located. This layout should be coordinated with the Fire Marshal. The most significant concern of either development phase is to ensure that these facilities are not constructed over existing or proposed utility lines. Plans need to indicate how existing utility lines will be abandoned, filled and relocated where this conflict occurs in the proposed phases. Frederick County will require a site plan to be approved prior to the construction of the Phase II improvements. This site plan can be reviewed "in-house" by the County Engineer, the Building Official, the Fire Marshal and myself, and approved administratively. Please share the information in this letter with your design team and advise them to contact any of our "in-house" review staff with questions. We look forward to working with you. Sincerely, 7 Evan A. Wyatt Planner II I . r• LAND DISTURBING PERMIT ISSUED TO: PFRRY FNG T NFFR T NG who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. This agreement, made this AGREEMENT 21. ST 1991. , by and between _ PFRRY FNCTNFFRTN(; day of NOVEmmR S party(s) of the first part, and the County of Frederick , Virginia, party of the second part. Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for the PROJECT HARVEST "HERSHEY' PLANT SITE PLAN of 20 (actual disturbed acres) and the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction and before final occupancy, the party(s) of the first part or his heirs/assigns agree to do the following work: 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction and to provide for conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. -2- The party (s) of the first part does further agree that an agent of Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in Athe approved plan. In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by PFRRY EN , T N FR T NG and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. PERRY ENGINEERING CORP ORATION B Y : Q'6i1 In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf by I ANNY C. RISE, II, PLANNER I County of Frederick, Virginia i BY: Frederi County Department of Planning and Development NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of a site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. 4 A I - STATE" OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK —3— I r flFRT D. SWTMLFY , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this M day personally appeared before me in my said County, (name) SUSAN FRITCH of (company) PERRY ENGINEERING and CANNY C. BISE, 11, PLANNER 1 of the Frederick County Department and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated NOVEMBER 21, 1991 did personally appear before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this 21ST day of NnyFMRFR , l99L. Notary Public My Commission expires on SEPT. 30, 1993 Post-W Fax Note 7671 Date,,CI pages To f CGi1 1l 'r From vrY 0- Co./Dept. Co. Phone # Phone # z(� Fax # 1 ,. I r ' r?SJ"1 / (_ 7 C\, Fax 4 I Uj -(S 1 gl D(( 7� County of Frederick Building Permit PERMIT NUMBER: 0000987 - 93 Winchester VA 22601 APPLICATION DATE: 6/2S/93 ISSUANCE DATE: 7/06/93 DATE: 7/06/93 OWNER: Miller Milling CONTRACTOR: OWNER 300 Park Center Drive SITE ADDRESS: Fort Collier Industrial Park Winchester, VA 300 Park Center Drive 22602 Winchester, VA 22602 PHONE: 703- PHONE: 703-665-9495 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION TAX MAP NO.: 54 A 36A SECTION: BLOCK: LOT: BLDG NO.: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SET-BACKS: HEALTH PERMIT NO.: DISTRICT: STONEWALL FRONT: BACK: FLOODPLAIN: SUB -DIVISION: Fort Collier Industrial RIGHT: LEFT: AREA: Red Bud Run ZONE: Light Industrial S/E CUP NO.: SITE PLAN: 002-92 DIRECTIONS TO SITE: At current location of Hershey Foods, Inc. USE GROUP: Use Group "B" Business USE CODE: Scales CONST. TYPE: New ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SQ FEET: Building Permit Bldg. Size Basement Crawlspace Const. Truss Roof Conv. Roof Floor Jois Floor Cov. Exterior W Covering Interior W Covering # Stories # Bedrooms # Bathroom Total# Ras Occup Load Note SCALES Note Note Note Note JOB VALUE: PERMIT FEE: Surcharge TOTAL FEES: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------; 25.00 I hereby agree to comply with all provisions of the Virginia .25 Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Zoning & Subdivision Ordinances as adopted by the County of Frederick. CABO 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING CODE or BOCA NATIONAL BUILDING CODE 25.25 ; Mechanics Lien Agent Designated: YES or NO Name of Agent: Address: Phone Number: :---------------------------------------------------------------------------; Applicant (signature) DATE Applicant (please print) 9EQUIR SI ATURES Bui(� jng�Qfficial -,K4 Zona Administrator DIIATTE(( DATE T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY CONCEPTUAL DES IGNS/CONSTRUCTION/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3424 Wooddale Avenue. MinAeapolis. Minnesota 55416-2385 Phone 612-929-1641 Telex 910 576-2703 FAX 612-929-8806 July 14, 1992 Mr. John S. Trenary Building Official County of Frederick Engineering and Inspections 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear John: Re: Foundation Permit Review Please accept our application for foundation permit review for the Miller Milling Co. project located in the Fort Collier Industrial Park in Winchester, Virginia. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to permit this project in phases. I will wait to hear from you on the approval of our foundation designs. John, if you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, T. E. MBERSON COMPANY David L. McCormick Project Manager/Estimator DLMc/jc cc: Mr. Herb Miller Miller Milling Company .7 �0r 1L^: �!i'ler 4illi�_ Ccmpa"- 7`77 Craia E Xrhan:e ."nu d':T,,a S5415 PEOPlE: 61Z-3?Z-5331 Apr,TCITT/•:1.j D'.TV: 7r!1rr%p^ ISL'A:;CE DATE: CO`rTRACTOR: 0VNE:- SITE ADDRESS: Fort Collier Industrial Park 54? Park Ce^.t_r Drive PSONE: 5541� DESCRIPTiO!t OF CONS TRUCT!ON LOC',TIC:d TA:' '!AP N0. , S ECC TT ?,r. ._. BLOCu: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LOT: BLDC - A "' H"ALTL' a"; .i NO., r:cT.":ICT STC1:ZVA _ �. FRr1 r' HAC::' FLOCDPLAI;;: SUB-DICISI'21: Ft, Ccl'_ier irdu3;r= ' RIC?T: LE?T; AREA: ZCr�, t; NE: _,ht .a1 Ir.d•.strial 5/E CUP NO,: SITE PLANT: L'IRECTIONS TO SITE: 542 Park Center Drive U G R U U .a Crcu: H„ K;, d USE CODS, k'arehouse CONCT, T"P7: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- •SR FEET: 9754 Building Parini+ ;id;, Size 145 33 BaseWaat Cr wl sP':: Con-t Trc _ Rocf Ccnr, Raof Floor ,leis SLAB FI;^r Ce' Co:ef n. Interi;,r ;; CC,"r.RE.E . _emu RZs Y. ov= ------ ------ -------------------------------------------------------------- r, :..;.. HE: Cf7�''� ;-- ---I --------- herz�y a,ra_ to cca;'_y wit;: all provisicr5 of the Vi^_'::,, -har__ 9. 7� Urif c r w Sts+ ','ide Huiluin^ C^de an' the ;c,. _ C:d:u3 u_3 3 adcrted 5y the Ccur.t: of Frcleri�.., O J p + CAE C 1 u' 7 A M I . D1j_'_L Tr ':S7Trl 1 7 p„e, „r,*., - r P�M Q. 9�?9/q 2 - -------------------------------- Builsia:/^�,1L- Z 0-- n,mn T Se -;- UOZ--?"Z COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 703 / 678-0682 October 9, 1992 Hershey Foods Corporation Attn: Mr. Ed Buchan, Project Engineer Technical Center Hershey, PA 17033-0805 RE: Site Plan Approval For Project Harvest (Phase II) The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #002-92 of Project Harvest on October 7, 1992. The approved site plan calls for the construction of a pasta production facility with warehousing, and a mill site with warehousing and silos. All site work shall comply with the requirements specified on the approved site plan. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. I would like to take this opportunity to welcome Hershey Foods Corporation to Frederick County, Virginia, as well as commend SSOE, Inc. on their professionalism. Mr. Jay Lingnell was instrumental in providing Frederick County with the information necessary to complete final plan approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter or be of any assistance. Evan A. Wyatt Planner II Glenn Zearfoss, Vice President Hershey Pasta Group Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Michael A. Didawick, Director of General Assessments Jay Lingnell, SSOE, Inc. David McCormick, T.E. Ibberson 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 vFILE COPY COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 March 22, 1993 Ibberson Engineering, Inc. Attn: Mr. Paul C. Murphy 828 Fifth Street South Hopkins, MN 55343-7750 RE: Miller Milling Site Plan Revision. Dear Mr. Murphy: I received the revised site plan for Miller Milling Company on March 19, 1993. I have had an opportunity to discuss the proposed revisions with other review agencies. The following information needs to be provided in order to receive final site plan approval: SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Please include the following information on this plan.) 1) Name and address of owner/developer. 2) Name, address and phone number of designer. 3) Signed engineer, surveyor or architect seal for Virginia. 4) Space labeled "approved by Zoning Administrator". 5) Height of all buildings and structures. 6) Note stating that this site is a part of the Hershey Foods Corporation tract. FUTURE CONSTRUCTION The site plan indicates that future construction will include additional warehouse, silo, and mill area. It is prudent to plan for total build -out at this time to avoid future plan revisions. You should indicate total structure, building, and parking needs now, and specify the construction by a phase plan. This will allow Miller Milling to receive future building permits in an expeditious fashion. O North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 V, inchcster. VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page -2- Murphy letter March 22, 1993 PARKING ISSUES 1) The approved site plan displayed all parking in an interior location by the warehouse. The revised site plan now indicates that the parking lot will adjoin the access drive between the mill and pasta plant. Frederick County is very concerned about this configuration. It is not good planning to allow vehicles to back onto roads or access lanes. This creates a potential safety hazard for all traffic utilizing this access road. Our regulations can not prevent this because this is not a public road; however, we strongly urge you to relocate the parking lot to its original location. 2) Please provide parking calculations that will meet future build -out needs for this site. The parking requirements for this use will be based on warehouse and office use. The number of spaces are as follows: Warehouse - 1 space per employee Office - 1 space per 250 square feet of floor area 3) All parking lots within industrial parks are required to have curb and gutter, pedestrian sidewalks along the parking row, disabled ramps and signage to meet ADA requirements, and perimeter landscaping of 1 shade tree for every 40 feet of parking lot. The revised site plan needs to provide these requirements. REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS 1) I discussed the proposed site plan revisions with the various site plan review agencies. I will list each agency and convey the information they need to receive. Frederick County Sanitation Authority_(FCSA) - Will require a site plan comment sheet, and two (2) copies of the revised plan that indicate the location of all water and sewer lines, the size of all lines, mains and laterals, manholes, and any utility easements. The contact for this department is John Whitacre (703) 665-5690 should you have any questions. Planning and Development (P&D) - The information in this letter needs to be incorporated on the revised plans. This will address my review of this project. Once approval is granted by the FCSA, you will provide P&D with four (4) copies of the final plan and a review fee of $300 made payable to the Treasurer of Frederick County. This will allow us to sign -off on this plan and provide Miller Milling and Ibberson with an approved copy. Page -3- Murphy letter March 22, 1993 County Engineer - Will require two (2) copies of the final plan to update his file. Fire Marshal - Will require two (2) copies of the final plan that indicates FCSA and P&D information, as well as fire protection facilities. Building Official - Will require a copy of the final site plan and revised structural drawings. The revised structural drawings can be submitted prior to final site plan approval. This will expedite the construction process. As we discussed, I will fax this letter to you and Mr. Herbert Miller, and then mail you the site plan application package. This package contains addresses and telephone numbers for all review agencies. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter, or if I may provide you with additional information. Sincerely, Lo' a . 0 Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW Enclosure cc: Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering John S. Trenary, Building Official Douglas A. Kiracofe, Fire Marshal John G. Whitacre, Sanitation Authority County of Frederick Building Permit PERMIT NUMBER: 0000351 - 93 Winchester f4--n•G01 1 �.. APPLICATION DATE: 3/25 93 :. I55UANCfi DATE: �5arlg,3 DATE: 3 26/93 OWNER: Killer Killing Company (off & ware) CONTRACTOR: LANTZ CONSTRUCTION CO. 302 Park Center Drive..3ITE ADDRESS: :Fort.Callier Industrial Park Winchester, VA .',302 Park Center Drive %22603 a: .., s . _ ,Winchester, .VA 22603 00000 PRONE: 703-678-0197 :�.:` r Y;,.'.-' s.-PBOHE: .,703-665-0130'. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION TAX MAP NO.: -54 A ;36A 'SECTION: `BLOCK: ~.*LOT: BLDG NO.: ----------------------------------- 7---------------------- ----------- -----------=--------------------------------------- SET -BACKS: HEALTH PERMIT NO.:. >=-•i.. DI5TRICT:.STOHEWALL FRONT: 100+ BACK: 100+ FLOODPLAIN: SUB -DIVISION: Fort Collier Industrial RIGHT: 100+ LEFT: 100+ -AREA: ZONE: Light Industrial c:' t S/E CUP NO.: .SITE PLAN: 2-92 41 DIRECTIONS TO SITE: - At current location of Miller Milling USE GROUP: Use Group "B" Business :F..;�:;_f:;.,USE CODE: Office,Building CONST. TYPE: New "'`5Q FEET: 5400 =. -------------------------------------------------,----------------:-------- ---S5_-------------------------------- - ,-—Building Permit Bldg, Size 33 X 82 °'Basement - ?: Crawlspare s';. Const. r .STEEL . Truss Roof METAL Conv, Roof Floor Jois SLAB Floor Cov, Exterior W CONCRETE Covering Interior W Covering # Stories # Bedrooms # Bathroom Total# His Occup Load Note WAREHOUSE WITH OFFICES Note ON SECOND FLOOR Note Note Note I------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JOB VALUE: 339,000.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------: PERMIT FEE: 540.00 I hereby agree to comply with all provisions of the Virginia Surcharge 5.40 i Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Zoning & Subdivision Ordinances as adopted by the County of Frederick. CABO 1 A 2 FAMILY DWELLING CODE or BOCA NATIONAL BUILDING CODE TOTAL FEES: 545.40 i Mechanics Lien Agent Designated: YES or NO Name of Agent: Address: ' Phone Number (Aa& Applicant (signature) I>/-TE 9-A Applicant (please print) 1 4"',/1W". 1"I SIGMA Biildins Affifiial ZonAq ldminiktrator qZ 4/ 843 / 'DATE ate . San►J& faukiDAj1c, J 64�,/ ! ��3 43 54+ELL_ %­�M lr OfO -1 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 May 12, 1993 Miller Milling Company Attn: Mr. Herbert Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Miller Milling Building Permits and Revised Site Plan. Dear Mr. Miller: This letter regards our telephone conversation of May 11, 1993. During that conversation, we discussed the requirements for a revised site plan and the need for a building permit at the Miller Milling site. Hopefully, this letter will address these interests. Our department provided Mr. Paul Murphy, of T.E. Ibberson, with a letter dated March 22, 1993. This letter provided the necessary requirements to obtain an approved revised site plan. It is my understanding that Greenway, Inc., of Winchester, is now the authorized agent to complete the revision process. I have provided Mr. H. Bruce Edens with a copy of the March 22, 1993 letter. The general contractor has been issued a footer foundation permit. It is our understanding that the general contractor is ready to proceed to the next phase of construction. Our department will sign -off on a permit to allow the construction of the building shell to begin. As with the footer foundation permit, the general contractor will proceed at their own risk during this phase of construction. Please insure that all required revisions to the site plan are submitted in a timely manner. This will allow all required review agencies the opportunity to complete their necessary reviews. The revised site plan needs to be finalized prior to the completion of this new phase of construction. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page -2- Miller Letter May 12, 1993 Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter, or if I may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: H.E. Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services Mr. John Trenary, Building Official Mr. Boyd Pitcock, Plans Review Specialist Mr. Kenneth Fox, Building Inspector Mr. Doug Kiracofe, Fire Marshal Mr. John Whitacre, Engineer Mr. Bruce Edens, Greenway, Inc. Mr. Harold Reynolds, T.E. Ibberson COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIR IA DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIO Caller KEV 1 o BA(i Time Called Z 30 o Date Called lz Z19 3 Phone No. `-% U ` O 19 -1 Time Requested AM Date Requested I Q /+ Q 3 Received By ICVR�S - Date of Inspection �S' 93 PERMIT HOLDER NAME M M 1L—IMSr (A►A PAX RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION RIZ-1— CUII__I L=< STREET NAME RRIC CG_LMD�� DIRECTIONS -TuKti1 f/RTp�J� I "*:_ i^r►y ���• BUILDING NO llls<�yc n'Ff-- or-- IRT 11 1.1 St Tt_ PLUMBING NO. /ES ehV0 aF- 12pr40 . ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICT �EM4C-�Wn PERMIT FOR: MI1..1-_ Type of Inspection Residential Footers Setbacks: FR Slab Draintile Water Service Sewer Rough Electric Rough Plumbing Groundworks Other: Rough Mechanical Gas Piping/Test Commercial V BK L Gas Fire -up Framing R Final Electrical Final Mechanical Final 1 Site Plan w' Final Building Final Plumbing Time In: �"5� Temperature o F Cut in No Time Out: I I SL Weather Fire Marshall Special/Complaint Results: Approved f, Rejected Comments: W1 0 0 La&"_i , �i.�-x C ' i� • _'y1AJ W t/V� Signature &a-" Q • Date 1 T T• 7M ,a D � 'v x x C ID�/,� l3 I 1 • DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND CUE COUNTY OF FREDERIC P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 703.665.6350 ;�npil�� ARRIVAL DEPARTURE WNSPECTORS NAME TYPE OF INSPECTION M V 0 v H H M M M M 1 ,a:' FIRST k 1u 2U 40r SWNkkiriiS klkl 31_J alarm system --ad door .. ..Y9EP STREET NAME SUIT APT 1 SRA I I I I I LJ11��/ 1✓ _— — �! new b 'lid, 6" oummg permit 7" blasting OCCUPANT TELEPHONE yC LI2I�L Ic 1 1 I I I t I elAmgauon m 9" tent 01 1 paniev,ew MANAGER, REPRESENTATIVE! BUSINESS TELEPHONE �Gf`�I�Ci/4�C_�_�1 "I Iustinstallation, 12" ust leak 131-1 ust removal 6l1!L:"NC OWNERS LAST NAME OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE 14" use liquid spilt -/ 15" annual knspecbon FIXED PROPERTY I I I I 'au MBER OF STORIES 16t I compavn 17LJ vglatan CONSTRUCTION TYPE ' L_' fire res'5hve 3 l_1 poieeteao non-cantx,snWe 51 1 poreorea orainan, 71 wood Name 9 U nor class'hed 2 Weary ;Wmber < LJ unporecled non{Ombushb,e 6 unprotected aarary 8 " ,w,Ororected wood 0 LJ urxdelerrrrmed 181-1 hre Lane fuoecoon 91 1 fine lane approval E',RE PREVENTION PERMIT a I RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD 2011 re--spe,7" M M D D Y v 211 o INSPECTION GUIDELINE —CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING EXn AND EGRESS 61 Unapaovea a Daernve Gas Connection ' Space Urder Saes Used la Storage Purposes C 3' Iradequate Means of E;•ess 52 Damaged of Overdraw vent Pipe on Gas Burning Aadeana 2 5loken Cei.ings and dr walls — Exposed Lath on Ceilings ano.w Wafts 32 Second Means of Egress 'rot Reaaey Accessnxe = 63 vent Hoops, vent tans anaor Duct Systems Need Cleanrg IUnnatura. Ocermgsl C 33 Aisles aroma Passageways Opstruced C 64 Cor rubes Being Stored Near Hot Water Healer 3 Detective and w Unapproved Irrcinerata ardor Spark Arrestor Screen C 34 Park Hardware Antl.PanC latches ana Bored %icufed on Exit Doors — a Cardboard Cewngs and or W30S C 35 Nscnarge From ExfC Ouslae Burling. Etc ORDINARY HAZARDS C 5 Fee Door Not Sernceaele 7 36 Ex: way Blocked anoa Obstructed C 65 Poor Housekeeping Condloorts Door Blocked of wedged Open C 37 Exit Door Locked and or Barrrcasea C 66 Improper Storage C On Soaked yyaod Flocs C 38 Exit Not Property Desgnated a Marked C 67 Storage of Floor Offs Clearing Compounds wares. Polishes, Etc = 9 Amc Areas Open m me Outside Screen ro Prevent Entry by Buds G 39 Ent Lights Provided But Not Operative C 68 Storage of Excns+or. Straw Sawdust. Bump. Etc C 9 Doors Repumng Sen-Clasmg Devices Not So Equipped ❑ 40 Iaurmnanng Duecoonal ygns to ExIts Required C 69 Metal Drip Pans Required But Not Provided t0 Pronkotive—Snag Be Razed C 41 Exit Door Swinging Against Line Or Exit laves C 70 Excessive Grease on Stove C 1 I Open and Exposes Foundation Beneath Bulaing Z 42 Stairways Not Property Encased antaor Equipped wv1 Nan -Standard Doors C 71 Cockaff Cover Ott C 12 Post Max Occupancy Load C 43 Stairways Not Property Mumnaled C 72 Unapproved lash Containers as Emergency White lights ELECTRICAL C 13 Illegal ardor Boot-L°g'wfvq FlRE PROTECTION SPECIAL HAZARDS C 73 Unnecessary ands Drsaderty Accumulabm of Boxes. Corneas. Etc. " 14 Inadequate Service anaor Insufficient Cal 45 Fire Exnngursrem Removed But Not Provided Collapse —Maintain Oroerry Arrangement EIS nsufflimf Receptacles 46 Fire Enrigulshers Need Recnarging IInspector 74 Smafg in Hazardous LpC7r M, 'No Smoxin $pfLS Needed C 16 Detective Deferroraed or Spaced wrring 047 Unapproved Type Fie Extingutwers 048 Fire Exengusrers Nol P operty Mounted a•.W 75 Flammable Lauds ardor Gases Berg Improperly Used and4r Steed ❑ 17 Detective anew Broken Fixtures 049 Fire Extingusrers Not Reaaity VrAie C 76 Inadequate Menmatron in Hazardous Location C' 18 Detective and or Broken Switches and.a Sockets C 50 Stardoice Hose Detenaaed-Not Racked C 77 Seorage of Compressed GasCykrders without Proper Anchorage (Racksor C 19 Circuit Breakers By -Passed or Blocked Open C 20 Overvze vises a a+x Circuit Breakers Set Top High" 51 Fee Protection System Cnainsl 78 Oxygen Cylinders Being Stored andw Used in Greasy or Locations 221 Pennies Behind Pug Type Fuses C 52 Detective Standpipe Noires 079 Oxygen Cylinders Bang Stated a ed Near Acetylene Fuel Gas ytfders C 22 Meta! Strip of Fuse Holder Cut Back C 53 Stanow System Orsr:onnected C 80 Oxidizing Matenas Bang Stored with Acids. Sulpha, Etc C 23 Fuses Jumper or Bridged C 54 Sprinkler Heads Cut Offs or Siamese Blocked � B 1 Unapproved anaor Hazardous Paint S iayfg C 2e Ocer Junctan Box and or Fuse Box 55 Inadequate Sprinkler Head Clearance n8 Inches;ecufedl � 82 Trash Room Door Not Euroced Won Self -Closing Device C 25 Fuse Perna Obstructed anaor Inaccessible 30' 56 Sol vanes Not Property rdenirffea C 83 Open Flame Heating in Hazardous Location C 26 Motors anaor Fans DirTy or Dust Covered HEATING AND COOKING C 84 Vacant at Time of Inspector G 27 Unapproved E otter ran Cords Drop Cads C 57 Delectne Heating Unit—Fvrrace. Gas Baer. Sam Healer. Etc C' 85 Locked at Time of Inspection C 28 Excess" Use of Murbple Outlet Rugs C 58 Detective Cooking Unit —Range, Hot Plate, Etc C 86 See Supplement Sheet C 29 Lamps. Fixtures. EqulpmenL Etc., Not Property EnL9psed (Hazardous C 59 Gas Meter Blocked ardor ObstructediNot Proww Locations Orl 060 Furnace. Baler. Heating. Cooking ands Smokeppe and vent Pipe 87 ill THE OPINION OF THE INSPECTOR, THERE WERE NO HAZARDOUS .0 30 Dead and Unused Wing; Should Be Removed Clearances, From Comoustide Materials, Not Standard CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS i The conditions reported on this form reflect C1e prelll5is as observed by our inspector, at The tlrrte of inspection- Arty efrorr or ommission regarding Ili safety or conch ons regardirkp fire prevention - flee unintentional and are not of 2cojuinty A RECEIVED BY IF FORA ES-1 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRAIA • DEPARTMENT O1F� INSPECTIONS Caller 6E'J)Q UPL-L- Time Called p -' Date Called Z Phone No. 6,7 `b — OI 9 Time Requested r' '=A t= Date Requested A'S.AP Received By EVE A • WyA —.I—Date of Inspection 8 / (. ! 9 3 s PERMIT HOLDER NAME I I LLL Nl I u NI ram" "f RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME P^t<v-' ���.i i Cif De ► V DIRECTIONS BUILDING NO. (I 19 77-- PLUMBING NO. ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICT PERMIT FOR: I�I1u.J`�►� rl►�.�.►�.}Lr I'1 ►LL / �1�_��/AEitOJ4 I r� Ict= 1 Type of Inspection / Residential Commercial .! Footers Setbacks: FR BK L R _ Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Water Service Framing Final Mechanical Sewer Rough Electric Final ✓� Site Plan Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Fire Marshall Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Special/Complaint Other: Time In: z ` Temperature IL -75 f : Cut in No. Time Out: 3 'c7 om Weather 2A i I Results: Approved Comments: WI Rejected Signature Date 8b, 119"j 0 ;,j J,,j._ COUNTY of FREDERICK Department ol' Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 July 1, 1993 Miller Milling Company Attn: Mr. Herbert G. Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Approval of Revised Miller Milling Site Plan Dear Mr. Miller: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved the revised Miller Milling Site Plan on June 30, 1993. The site plan was revised to indicate the relocation of the office/warehouse building and the relocation of the eight (8) inch fire main. Other improvements specified on this revised site plan include the construction of a truck scale, an asphalt parking lot complete with 22 regular parking spaces, one (1) disabled parking space that will be van accessible, curb and gutter, and parking lot landscaping, a fire lane that will be twenty (20) feet wide, and all appropriate erosion and sedimentation control measures. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. I have provided Mr. Harold Reynolds of Ibberson Engineering, Inc. with an approved copy of the site plan. This will allow the contractors to have an approved copy of the site plan on the construction site. Please have Mr. Reynolds contact this office to schedule an on -site inspection when all improvements are complete. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor Michael A. Didawick, Director of General Reassessments Harold Reynolds, Ibberson Engineering, Inc. Paul C. Murphy, Ibberson Engineering, Inc. H. Bruce Edens, Greenway, Inc. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 2'_604 County of Frederick Building Permit PERMIT NUMBER: 0000987 - 93 Winchester VA 22601 APPLICATION DATE: 6/25/93 ISSUANCE DATE: 7/06/93 DATE: 7/06/93 OWNER: Miller Milling CONTRACTOR: OWNER 300 Park Center Drive SITE ADDRESS: Fort Collier Industrial Park Winchester, VA 300 Park Center Drive 22602 Winchester, VA ZZ6O2 PHONE: 703- PHONE: 703-665-9495 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION TAX MAP NO.: 54 A 36A SECTION: BLOCK: LOT: BLDG NO.: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SET-BACKS: HEALTH PERMIT NO.: DISTRICT: STONEWALL FRONT: BACK: FLOODPLAIN: SUB -DIVISION: Fort Collier Industrial RIGHT: LEFT: AREA: Red Bud Run ZONE: Light Industrial S/E CUP NO.: SITE PLAN: 002-9Z DIRECTIONS TO SITE: At current location of Hershey Foods, Inc. USE GROUP: Use Group "B" Business USE CODE: Scales CONST. TYPE: New ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SQ FEET: Building Permit Bldg. Size Basement Crawlspace Const. Truss Roof Conn. Roof Floor Jois Floor Cov. Exterior W Covering Interior W Covering # Stories # Bedrooms # Bathroom Total# Rms Occup Load Note SCALES Note Note Note )dote JOB VALUE: PERMIT FEE: Surcharge TOTAL FEES: :-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Z5.00 I hereby agree to comply with all provisions of the Virginia .25 ! Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Zoning 6 Subdivision Ordinances as adopted by the County of Frederick. 1 , CABO 1 & Z FAMILY DWELLING CODE or BOCA NATIONAL BUILDING CODE Z5.25 Mechanics Lien Agent Designated: YES or NO Name of Agent: ; Address: Phone Number: :-------------------------------------------------------------------------- Applicant (signature) DATE c' A n L,ae .0 UIRED 1 in fficial s Zon g Administrators 32 CO! 30( q_:3 DATE DATE Applicant (please print) • u �kn �� F, 5Pcc- ? COUNTY of FREDERICK * � Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 © ' ' Fax 703 / 678-0682 June 28, 1993 Soo �® a N G�`� N\tom co David McCormickT�t2te6l' 777 Grain Exchange Building 0'0Minneapolis, MN 55415 81 RE: June 25, 1993 Meeting Regarding Miller Milling Project. Dear Mr. McCormick: This letter regards the above referenced meeting with Mr. John S. Trenary, Building Official, Boyd Pitcock, Plans Review Specialist, and myself. The purpose of our meeting was to determine all outstanding items necessary to provide Miller Milling with an approved site plan. The following items need to be resolved: 1) The fire lane through this portion of the site needs to be twenty (20) feet wide and maintain the forty (40) foot setback from the mill building. 2) The location of the proposed truck weigh scale needs to be indicated on the site plan. All structural drawings associated with this truck scale need to be submitted to Mr. Pitcock for review and approval prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) As built drawings showing the sprinkler main that is located under the warehouse/office building need to be provided to Mr. Trenary if the sprinkler main is to remain in this location. If the sprinkler main is to be relocated, the site plan needs to be revised to provide the new location. Mr. Trenary will also need all structural engineering information for either scenario specified under item #3. 4) Our department will need a letter from Miller Milling accepting either proposal specified under item #3. This letter needs to address the location and structural stability of the sprinkler main. This letter may be addressed to the Frederick County Planning Department and sent to my attention. 9 North Loudoun Street Winchester, VA 22601 P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page -2- McCormick Letter June 28, 1993 All items included in this letter need to be resolved prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Permit for this project. Our department will need five (5) copies of the final revised site plan and the letter from Miller Milling. This will allow us to provide final site plan approval for Phase I of this project. It is my understanding that you will be contacting our department in the near future to discuss the proposed expansion of this facility. I will be happy to coordinate a meeting with all necessary review agencies when this meeting is desired. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, &JOI 0- L#- Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator John S. Trenary, Building Official Boyd Pitcock, Plans Review Specialist Douglas A. Kiracofe, Fire Marshal Harvey E. Strawsnyder, County Engineer Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company Harold Reynolds, Ibberson, Inc. Paul C. Murphy, Ibberson, Inc. George Hughes, Lantz Construction \,J6hn Gast, Greenway, Inc. i GREENWAY, INC. 970 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22603 703 662 -4165 H. BRUCE EDENS, L.S. PRESIDENT Oil 1161 EF•; OF lill T TAB G 9.3 JOe AM, G CAIAC e"e-Al I•VE ARE T/xE A7-74C1-1CO P�/NTS CO //e3 OA T 6 A/O. OE.S C x /O r/O.t/ S Is93 S z ��1�1e�JT SFtT T,•/ESE ACE 7,e.4.t/5M/7'TEO ,4S «•/EC.CED 6EZOW ❑ eC5&f"/17E0 C'OP/ES /'O,e APO.POV4Z O FOle !'OU,C USE ❑ SUBM/TTEU COP/ES FO.P O/.ST,e/BUT10AI ❑ AS ,eE0UES7E0 ❑ ,ecme lee Pe1x17S ❑ / OTC eLrY/EN' 4� COMit/ -Al r ❑ ,eEMA,e,e.S S/6,t/ED : • SITE PLAN APPLICATION Complete the following application: DATE ��/" U APPLICATION # JUN1993 RECE�C E DEPT. Of AND DEVELOPMEW `DOE' 1. Development 11-1/GG6� ifil/L.G//(/117 2. Location of Property: syo ,D/,�ipr G�iC/T� i2 C7/�iu�= (by street name) 3. Property Owner: Address: /00 cIOY,5 7 L Telephone: 717 - Z3q - 705(/ 4. Applicant/Agent: C�Q�L,V why /,Uc. Address: rj 7D �3�,���' L.4-k)Z:- Telephone: 5. Designer: Address: GrriN�ff � STE/e �y�y, ZZGG3 Telephone: e,5 Contact: ey/ST 6. Is this an original or revised Site Plan? Original Revised -5- E s 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: )P`2, /,i6 4<- 8. Property Information: - a) Property ID #: b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Use: e) Adjoining Property Zoning: f) Adjoining Property Use: g) Magisterial District: ��v�F.acrrJeiyC'7 hU e7 'Off-/ eo,oa .V I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick county Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: Date: G "�� �✓z GREENWAY, INC. i 970 BAKER LANE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22603 703 662 -A166 H. BRUCE EDENS, L.S. PRESIDENT L TTEH OF TF'iANSM1T TAL s -�3 7- AlrIOAl Lc WY,4TT �iL LC/2 /L1�LG/N�� G C /TL EMCAI YE ARE S ENO1AJO YOU r zlE A T TA C All C D co//e's OATE NO. DE5C,C/P7-/0,1 % s'/b-%3 S/T� /�Lg.</ ,p�L.9�TL=0 or2w4s THESE A,eE 7',e.4A15A,//T1rEO AS BEeOW ❑ ,ae .4 P"0,k4,1 ❑ ,�ESU�M/T>EO C'OR/ES FOB 4�PfOriOC ❑ FO,e I'OC/,e USE ❑ SUBM/TTEU COP/E"S fO.e D/S>.e/BUT/ON ❑ AS ,e EO UES7EO ❑ z c7TUI e c/ED CO,e e ECTEO P,e /.(/TS L� FOle lff�llzr& f CO'w"6 I/T ❑ ,eEMA,e,rs Thy/S �S,�,a� / jT�L /s Fo2 �4'P.�/lo�/•4 L OF TiyE ,P�=c�i�%v�� 1; ,*,O rCil-/67 GOT 924/1- Y r�r+� fflaA./EO: V. r U i COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 May 12, 1993 Miller Milling Company Attn: Mr. Herbert Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Miller Milling Building, Permits and Revised Site Plan. Dear Mr. Miller: This letter regards our telephone conversation of May 11, 1993. During that conversation, we discussed the requirements for a revised site plan and the need for a building permit at the Miller Milling site. Hopefully, this letter will address these interests. Our department provided Mr. Paul Murphy, of T.E. Ibberson, with a letter dated March 22, 1993. This letter provided the necessary requirements to obtain an approved revised site plan. It is my understanding that Greenway, Inc., of Winchester, is now the authorized agent to complete the revision process. I have provided Mr. H. Bruce Edens with a copy of the March 22, 1993 letter. The general contractor has been issued a footer foundation permit. It is our understanding that the general contractor is ready to proceed to the next phase of construction. Our department will sign -off on a permit to allow the construction of the building shell to begin. As with the footer foundation permit, the general contractor will proceed at their own risk during this phase of construction. Please insure that all required revisions to the site plan are submitted in a timely manner. This will allow all required review agencies the opportunity to complete their necessary reviews. The revised site plan needs to be finalized prior to the completion of this new phase of construction. 9 North Lo0oun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester. VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page -2- Miller Letter May 12, 1993 Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter, or if I may be of further assistance. Sincerely, En, d.U#— Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: H.E. Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services Mr. John Trenary, Building Official Mr. Boyd Pitcock, Plans Review Specialist Mr. Kenneth Fox, Building Inspector Mr. Doug Kiracofe, Fire Marshal Mr. John Whitacre, Engineer Mr. Bruce Edens, Greenway, Inc. Mr. Harold Reynolds, T.E. Ibberson Hershey Foods Hershey Foods Corporation Technical Center P.O. Box 805 Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0805 Phone: (717] 534-5000 Telex: 6711079 HERSH UW Fax: (717) 534-5078 April 30, 1993 Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Planner I/Zoning Inspector County of Frederick, Department of Planning and Development 9 N. Loudon Street P. 0. Box 601 Winchester, Pennsylvania 22601 Dear Evan: The construction of the new Hershey Pasta Group's production plant at the Fort Collier Industrial Park is nearing completion. The original design called for a warehouse to be constructed in the area directly south of the existing production building. This warehouse was eliminated after the final design was completed. If, at some time in the future, a warehouse is constructed at the site, the roadway in the southwest area of the site will be macadamed per the original design. The roadway is currently stoned and is barricaded at each end so the area is inaccessible. The roadway will be properly maintained so it meets Frederick County requirements. Please call me at (717) 534-5101 if there are questions concerning this memo. Thank you for your help on this entire project. EGB/sw cc: E. Boyer M. Cahill M. Nelson-HBA E. Strawsnyder-Frederick County G. Zearfoss Sincerely yours, Edward G. Buchan, P.E. Project Manager 3 1993 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIONIA DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS Caller �NbeL50tJ Time Called �� ' At^'I, Date Called �8f l3 Phone No. -117— 7.3j — 90 1 3 Time Requested ASAP Date Requested ASA P Received By E�Ar-04 YATT— Date of Inspection 4 25193 PERMIT HOLDER NAME U . G . A t-,'XP,,3 `� RT. NO. ! 3 ZZ Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION Fs. ,� �4.� K, �.�L1�'R. 1.1i�ii �/�L STREET NAME PAQ1� Jc DIRECTIONS TuerJ ati-T-r- BUILDING NO. PPrRV, �i2� vE PLUMBING NO. SIT- A-r- ELECTRICAL NO PERMIT FOR: 1-t�=7 5'+t1/ PA�-A Type of Inspection Residential Footers Setbacks: FR Slab Draintile Water Service Sewer Rough Electric Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Other: Time In: Z' Temperature MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO DISTRICT Tt"o►J.�f}L. Time Out: .4-5 Weather Commercial BK L R Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Framing Final Mechanical Final z" Site Plan Final Building Final Plumbing Fire Marshall Special/Complaint Cut in No. Results: Approved s/ Rejected Comments: l nMJ?t_--rE A-SP+ti!L:r D2iit T4,,Qx r`eK.- Tz (Z1" '_6PW[-_R'x'C ROAp'�. � Ct�MPL_t—T'C GeAiliti)Cs AL.L I5 �Ow15�LuC CE� Signature ���.�J J Date County of Frederick Building Permit PERMIT NUMBER: 0000351 - 93 Winchester *6 — ttio l APPLICATION DATE: 3yz_6)�/_ 93 ISSUANCE DATE: ?21'I_3 DATE: 393 OWNER:Miller Milling Company (off & ware) CONTRACTOR: LANTZ CONSTRUCTION CO. 302 Park Center Drive SITE ADDRESS: Fort Collier Industrial Park Winchester, VA 302 Park Center Drive 22603 Winchester, VA 22603 00000 PHONE: 703-678-0197 PHONE: 703-665-0130 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATION TAX MAP NO.: 54 A 36A SECTION: BLOCK: LOT: BLDG NO.: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SET-BACKS: HEALTH PERMIT NO.: DISTRICT: STONEWALL FRONT: 100+ BACK: 100+ FLOODPLAIN: SUB -DIVISION: Fort Collier Industrial RIGHT: 100+ LEFT: 100+ AREA: ZONE: Light Industrial S/E CUP NO.: SITE PLAN: 2-92 DIRECTIONS TO SITE: At current location of Miller Milling USE GROUP: Use Group "B" Business USE CODE: Office Building CONST. TYPE: New 50 FEET: 5400 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ •Building Permit Bldg. Size 33 % 82 Basement Crawlspace Const. STEEL Truss Roof METAL Conv. Roof Floor Jois SLAB Floor Cov. Exterior W CONCRETE Covering Interior W Covering # Stories # Bedrooms # Bathroom Total# Rms Occup Load Note WAREHOUSE WITH OFFICES Note ON SECOND FLOOR Note Note Note ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ JOB VALUE: 339,000.00 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------� PERMIT FEE: 540.00 I hereby agree to comply with all provisions of the Virginia Surcharge 5.40 Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Zoning & Subdivision Ordinances as adapted by the County of Frederick. CABO 1 & 2 FAMILY DWELLING CODE or BOCA NATIONAL BUILDING CODE TOTAL FEES: 545.40 Mechanics Lien Agent Designated: YES or NO Name of Agent: Address: �y ; Phone Number:- ���------�}1=�c'- D SIGMA?U.e Applicant (signature) Buildin 1 Zan' g dmini rator 41 12-3 9 ��TE � A , DATE Applicant (please print) ��I � FwnLiG 5uuDA-1i o+.1 CJ JLy -%3 43 S(+ELL_ Poz041 r 0"yFk l • • FILE COPY March 22, 1993 Ibberson Engineering, Inc. Attn: Mr. Paul C. Murphy 828 Fifth Street South Hopkins, MN 55343-7750 RE: Miller Milling Site Plan Revision. Dear Mr. Murphy: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 I received the revised site plan for Miller Milling Company on March 19, 1993. I have had an opportunity to discuss the proposed revisions with other review agencies. The following information needs to be provided in order to receive final site plan approval: SITE PLAN INFORMATION (Please include the following information on this plan.) 1) Name and address of owner/developer. 2) Name, address and phone number of designer. 3) Signed engineer, surveyor or architect seal for Virginia. 4) Space labeled "approved by Zoning Administrator". 5) Height of all buildings and structures. 6) Note stating that this site is a part of the Hershey Foods Corporation tract. FUTURE CONSTRUCTION The site plan indicates that future construction will include additional warehouse, silo, and mill area. It is prudent to plan for total build -out at this time to avoid future plan revisions. You should indicate total structure, building, and parking needs now, and specify the construction by a phase plan. This will allow Miller Milling to receive future building permits in an expeditious fashion. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 «'inchester. VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 • U Page -2- Murphy letter March 22, 1993 PARKING ISSUES 1) The approved site plan displayed all parking in an interior location by the warehouse. The revised site plan now indicates that the parking lot will adjoin the access drive between the mill and pasta plant. Frederick County is very concerned about this configuration. It is not good planning to allow vehicles to back onto roads or access lanes. This creates a potential safety hazard for all traffic utilizing this access road. Our regulations can not prevent this because this is not a public road; however, we strongly urge you to relocate the parking lot to its original location. 2) Please provide parking calculations that will meet future build -out needs for this site. The parking requirements for this use will be based on warehouse and office use. The number of spaces are as follows: Warehouse - 1 space per employee Office - 1 space per 250 square feet of floor area 3) All parking lots within industrial parks are required to have curb and gutter, pedestrian sidewalks along the parking row, disabled ramps and signage to meet ADA requirements, and perimeter landscaping of 1 shade tree for every 40 feet of parking lot. The revised site plan needs to provide these requirements. REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS 1) I discussed the proposed site plan revisions with the various site plan review agencies. I will list each agency and convey the information they need to receive. Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) - Will require a site plan comment sheet, and two (2) copies of the revised plan that indicate the location of all water and sewer lines, the size of all lines, mains and laterals, manholes, and any utility easements. The contact for this department is John Whitacre (703) 665-5690 should you have any questions. Planning and Development (P&D) - The information in this letter needs to be incorporated on the revised plans. This will address my review of this project. Once approval is granted by the FCSA, you will provide P&D with four (4) copies of the final plan and a review fee of $300 made payable to the Treasurer of Frederick County. This will allow us to sign -off on this plan and provide Miller Milling and Ibberson with an approved copy. 0 s Page -3- Murphy letter March 22, 1993 County Engineer - Will require two (2) copies of the final plan to update his file. Fire Marshal - Will require two (2) copies of the final plan that indicates FCSA and P&D information, as well as fire protection facilities. Building Official - Will require a copy of the final site plan and revised structural drawings. The revised structural drawings can be submitted prior to final site plan approval. This will expedite the construction process. As we discussed, I will fax this letter to you and Mr. Herbert Miller, and then mail you the site plan application package. This package contains addresses and telephone numbers for all review agencies. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter, or if I may provide you with additional information. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II NEW Enclosure cc: Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering John S. Trenary, Building Official Douglas A. Kiracofe, Fire Marshal John G. Whitacre, Sanitation Authority e * IBBERSON l I I ENGINEERING INC. New Minneapolis, Minnesota Headquarters 828 Fifth Street South, Hopkins, MN 55343-7750 Phone 612-938-7007 Fax 612-939-0451 Telex 910-576-2703 TO LETRR OF TRANSMITTAL DATE alledu, NO. JOB91-1 ATTEN RE: I �q P NAII W I fJL, V/� _ GENTLEMEN: 9Q-1o2-�rt-Y WE ARE SENDING YOU Attached ❑ Under separate cover via the following items: ❑ Shop drawings Prints ❑ Plans ❑ Samples ❑ Specifications ❑ Operating Manual ❑ Tracing ❑ COPIES ORWG. NO. REV. NO. DESCRIPTION L F' THESE ARE TRANSMITTED, as checked below: ❑ for approval ',/(For your use ❑ As requested ❑ For review and comment ❑ FOR BIDS DUE ❑ Approved as submitted ❑ Approved as noted ❑ Returned for corrections 19 REMARKS: COPY TO SIGNED: - If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. ❑ Resubmit — copies for approval ❑ Submit — copies for distribution ❑ Return — corrected prints ❑ RETURN APPROVED PRINTS • 'W 1►.� 5 I E\//-U I '_ ' Vr--- L.I ST'Z=o T"E 1-4 av" tit 4.0 E Tv 1- is a S I T-S- PLA.� r o2 T -14 G. P(Lo JeLLT 1 L) 1u 1 u L tl wrt!y,Z , V L. 1� rZC-.vtSq---O -rW'F. w,�2.�t��s� L .Neow-r wrrad & \u A. L.11.W /LK 1` TZo M T to E t= L. Ov rL 2) 21=L.0 ,�- /a'T�� -M ke- 9/12.1L1 u [-. SPoT S 3� Aflo+m T'NeL 10'-o x 33�621 L...7O1vG-b 4> 2L=-VtSL..D T%1E 61Ztc 01= -rwe rzAE:(-�V 1 VGA t3 u 1 L-10 10 C-a D W t� T"E IC-".e -r Q O A_CL TO 1 u Lt_ W OS L� Po2-rto� of -rtAe oC `\v1v6- BytLSOtvG T" NEL T fZru 4-Y-, 5 e1� l_G—' Qo2TR T-o 34'-o -TUC--- zo'-d "4j1 0t. T"E. F l_A u fL M 1 Lrl. �v T W C LL VZ.)-- . -r"o 191993 MYS�..t�' 02 D�`l� t�tL,Lp2MtG1� l.)S GAT T'12�V S'T112TUt� bL� TL.iE P02-M o u otr `fi N &U IC 5 PavL- C, NAL ZPA y WR BUILDING INSPECTION HISTORY OF INSPECTIONS PERMIT NUMBER: 0000351 - 93 ➢ATE INSPECTION TYPE INSPECTOR RSLT ** C O M M E N T S 4/23/93 Footer Kenneth B. Fox *P east and south side 4/2B/93 Wall Kenneth B. Fox *P east, west, south and 3/4 of north 5/03193 Wall Kenneth B. Fox *P all of wall footings finish; 3 pier cols 5/20/93 Slab Kenneth B. Fox *P elect pad 5/25/93 Slab Kenneth B. Fox *P stair well only 5/27/93 Bolt Test Kenneth B. Fox *R 5/27193 Bolt Test Kenneth B. Fox F Passed outside bolts only; failed inside 5/27/93 Bolt Test Kenneth B. Fox *P 2nd Floor (NOT ROOF) 5/27/93 Groundworks John S. Trenary *P STORM ONLY, underground storm drains only with 10' water head test 6/01/93 Slab Kenneth B. Fox F Clean decking off, Put wire in place 6101/93 Slab Kenneth B. Fox F clean decking off; put wire in place 6/01/73 Water & Sewer Larry H. DeHaven F need more than 50 lb on water main; wouldn't hold test; gravel around sewer 6/02/93 Slab Kenneth B. Fox *P mezz and ground fl slabs; two trips 6/02/93 Slab Kenneth B. Fox *P sezz and ground fl slabs 6/02/93 Water a Sewer Larry H. DeHaven *P sub to hard cap on sewer line under floor 6/21/93 Framing Kenneth B. Fox F need more info an window installation and flashing; ok to insulate; check opening in firewall 6/21/93 Rough Plumbing Larry H. DeHaven F need to cut in wyes for floor drains and set floor drains; need shower valves; ok to close in except behind shower at valves 6122/93 Framing Kenneth B. Fox *P 6/22/93 insulation Kenneth B. Fox *P 6/22193 Rough Electric Gary E. George *P 6/23/93 Misc. John S. Trenary *P Class 52 ductal iron Questions on type of windows 6/24/93 Rough Plumbing Larry H. DeHaven F ok to close in all of upstairs area; still need to see test on waste and vents 7/01/93 Misc. Larry H. DeHaven *P test on sewer drain in building 7/13193 Final Electric Gary E. George F not ready; power not on 7/15/93 Fire Marshal Douglas A. Kiracofe *P hydro approved; beginning pressure 205 psi at 09501 ending pressure 205 psi; walked system; all piping and hangars are per approved drawings; system not in service pending underground 7/15/93 Misc, Kenneth B. Fox F need all finals and zoning 7/t6/93 Final Plumbing Larry H. DeHaven F no water or sewer ready; need to lower urinal to 17 in.; need 36 in. bar behind stools; need pep test; need hot water 7/16/93 Peppermint Test Larry H. DeHaven F no test done 7/19/93 Final Building Kenneth B. Fox F need water on; need elec on; pour concrete at dolumns and stand pipe; patch firewalls at conduit between buildings; landings outside doors; base and carpet.; window installation info; need stairs for 2nd exit 7/19/93 Final Building Kenneth B. Fox F not ready; but windows are approved as installed per manufact. 7/19/93 Final Electric Gary E. George F check on emergency lights 7/19/93 Final Mech. John S. Trenary F need to install roof jacks on exhaust fans for final meth 7/22/93 Misc. Kenneth B. Fox F installing new water line outside building -will fill pipe under footer with grout 7/23/93 Final Electric Gary E. George F 1st fl emergency and exit lights not working 7/27/93 Final Mech. John S. Trenary *P sprinkler test on underground pipe 160 lb 30 min BUILDING INSPECTION HISTORY OF INSPECTIONS PERMIT NUMBER: 0000351 - 93 DATE INSPECTION TYPE INSPECTOR RSLT ** C O M M E N T S I 7/27/93 Final Mach. John S. Trenary 7/27/93 Final Mach. John S. Trenary 7/27/93 Final Plumbing John S. Trenary 7/27/93 Peppermint Test John S. Trenary 7/28/93 final Electric Gary E. George 7/28/93 Final Electric Gary E. George 7/29/93 Final Building Kenneth B. Fox 7/29/93 Final Building Kenneth B. Fox 8102/93 Misc. Kenneth B. Fox 8/25/93 Final Building Kenneth B. Fox 5/31/94 Final Building Kenneth B. Fox *P *P I-p *P *P *P *R F eng report on pipe under footer; landing at doors; 2nd exit off of 2nd fl; fix holes in exterior fire; handicap bars behind toilet 3 ft min; zoning approval F need neg report on filling pipe F oa for temp c.o.; need roof over stairs; need zoning approval *P I 5 LTG FC�I..a � �-� ^>..�:.a►;.�. A-.N1 tom+ TU T ! S c �'+r./�.►,..� F v n�. Ll A /1. \:._� G L-t_.w /�` ! �= � � � ��'•. T � � � �. �v tZ tit 1 LL . — =)t Dry.\;C L1 G%s� L�_ Ord VS C,tT -ri JG, �v fir" � T;a:.�:�r=. �'on�-t-t ocJ o� �� F'►'��.` ��, T . 1 91�93 i COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 October 9, 1992 Hershey Foods Corporation Attn: Mr. Ed Buchan, Project Engineer Technical Center Hershey, PA 17033-0805 RE: Site Plan A.pproval For Project Harvest (Phase II) Dear Mr. Buchan: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #002-92 of Project Harvest on October 7, 1992. The approved site plan calls for the construction of a pasta production facility with warehousing, and a mill site with warehousing and silos. All site work shall comply with the requirements specified on the approved site plan. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. I would like to take this opportunity to welcome Hershey Foods Corporation to Frederick County, Virginia, as well as commend SSOE, Inc. on their professionalism. Mr. Jay Lingnell was instrumental in providing Frederick County with the information necessary to complete final plan approval. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter or be of any assistance. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II cc: Glenn Zearfoss, Vice President Hershey Pasta Group Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company Charles W. Orndoff, Sr., Stonewall District Supervisor John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Michael A. Didawick, Director of General Assessments Jay Lingnell, SSOE, Inc. David McCormick, T.E. Ibberson 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 . of ' -'[� r 0 0 I September 8, 1992 SSOE, INC. Attn: Mr. Jay Lingnell 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 RE: Hershey Pasta Group Site Plan - Phase II. Dear Mr. Lingnell: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 This leiter regards the status of the above referenced site plan. Hopefully, this information will apprise your staff with the status of this review. Frederick County has required administrative review of Phase II for the Miller Milling project. This review was required by all agencies involved with Phase I with the exception of the Virginia Department of Transportation. The agencies involved in this review are the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County Building Official, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Engineer, and the Frederick County Planning Department. At this time, the Frederick County Planning Department is the only review agency that is in the position to provide administrative approval of this site plan. I had an opportunity to talk with Mr. Richard Scott of your staff. I told Mr. Scott that I would provide an assessment of the project to date. The Frederick County Planning Department will need to obtain approved copies of all specified review agency comments and four (4) copies of the final site plan. Once this has transpired, I will recommend final approval of Phase II of this site plan. It is my understanding, that SSOE, INC. will be able to provide Frederick County with reduced copies of the final site plan. This is desirable due to the size of this site plan. 9 North Loudoun Street Winchester, VA 22601 P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page -2- Lingnell Letter September 8, 1992 Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter, or be of any assistance. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW/slk cc: Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Rick Scott, SSOE, INC. Miller Killer^ Compam, 777 Grain E'_hange Euilding Minnea^OIis, M'! 7EDI"_^ v.fifF^P. APP�'ICATIOI'I DATE: ISSUAIICE DATE: DATE; 0WIN EF Fart Collier Industrial Park S4' Park Center Drive 7%,-==- 7117/0 .7 DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTION LOCATICid — TU UP NO.: SECTION: BLOCK: LOT: BLDG NO.: -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------- - - - - -- ------------------ SET �ACI:'' HEALTH PERMIT NO.; DISTFICT, -- TCITTVy'T FRONT: BACK: FLOOP,PLAIIi: SUE -DIVISION: Ft. Col der Industrial RIGHT: LE?T; AREA: ZONE: Light Ir.d'rstrial S/E CUP NO,: S U R PU M, DIRECTIONS TO SITE: 542 Park Center Drive USE GROUP; Use Group 'T' High Hazard CODE: ',Varehouse CONST, TYPE: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _USE SQ FEET: 9784 Building Permit Bldg, Size 148 X 33 BasEmeat Crawlspace Con" Truss Roof Conv. Roof Floor dais- SLAB FIocr CovE-v. feria, ;' COIdCFETE Coverinj Interior c' CONCRETE CaRerins # 5+' -s= # Bedrooms # Bathr,au Tuta I F^c 1,10 4- Nita I!ot TOE VALUE: 3.SOC,00.).00 ------------------------------------------------------- -------- aynvyT v7c (;l -----I-er.�c--a- to cun-----y--------------------------------- ------ 7 by q. �r_y with all provi,ions of the Vi:gin; a f Surchar e 9. Uniform StatE:eide Buildin; Code an', the Zonin= & SuMivision Ordinanc_s -s adopted by the County of Frederic::, I 9 D , � mnmr' nC: 90 �' 10 ' C.'�B�• 1 u . F.ii{ ..i 't�"tTtlfv ('077 ,vn L+nn1 `�f1^T rr., t!rrnTr, PE - GOOD go— A" Pram, L u nF. -- iur.aturE.' Builaintc—g;P, DA—1mZistor CAT T A:'!._...: U�IDA`i-toQ T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY �` 011 1 July 14, 1992 Mr. John S. Trenary Building Official County of Frederick Engineering and Inspections 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear John: Re: Foundation Permit Review CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS/CONSTRUCTION/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3424 Wooddale Avenue. Mint%eapolis, Minnesota 55416-2385 Phone 612-929-1641 Telex 910 576-2703 FAX 612-929-8806 Please accept our application for foundation permit review for the Miller Milling Co. project located in the Fort Collier Industrial Park in Winchester, Virginia. Thank you for allowing 'us the opportunity to permit this project in phases. I will wait to hear from you on the approval of our foundation designs. John, if you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY David L. McCormick Project Manager/Estimator DL.Mc/jc cc: Mr. Herb Miller Miller Milling Company �{�2srrcy s. P. C)o T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY April 10, 1992 Mr. Evan A. Wyatt Planner II P.O. Box 601 9N Loudoun St. Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Evan: CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS/CONSTRUCTION/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT 3424 Wooddale Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416-2385 Phone 612-929-1641 Telex 910 576-2703 FAX 612-929-8806 Re: Height requirements for the the proposed flour mill building Winchester, Virginia The portion of the mill buiding that is in question is typically not enclosed. (Please refer to the sketch that is enclosed.) On a typical project, we would allow the equipment to be exposed to the atmos- phere. Because of the situation in Winchester, we feel that it is important that the building be constructed in a manner that will be cosmetically accept- able to Hershey, Frederick County, and the City of Winchester. In order to achieve our goal, we would like to extend the exterior walls of the mill building to enclose the equipment that is to be mounted at the top of the process floors, which will increase our overall building height approximately 20 feet. I would also like to mention that we are asking for the height variance prior to completing our building design in order to save our project the complica- tions of redesigning the mill process and building. Evan, I would like to thank you for your commitment and responsiveness to our needs, and it is a pleasure working with such a professional group of people. Sincerely, T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY David L. McCormick Project Manager/Estimator DLMc/jl/fl Enclosure FPM&.M MEMBER OF: ® Dairy and Food Industries gyp, Supply Association, Inc. 8245 EXECUTIVE BOULEVARD ROCKVMEMBER 301RB4I1444 MTEL%N 523939 " V Job = NEW Plan No. NIA IV Owner NILLPR LL Location Sheet No. T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY Contractor Calculations For Rev. A SUBSIDIARY OF IBBfRSON INC. 3424 Wooddale Avenue - Minneapolis, Minnesota 55416 Mat'l. Code No. By Date Phone:612-929-1641 Telex 910-576-2703 FAX 612-929-8806 Shown on Dwg. iChk'd. By I Date Q> 0 �l 1V _ COG 4 " COUNTY of FREDERICK wDepartment of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 17J8 `Hl.lFAX 7031, 678-0683 March 3, 1992 SSOE, INC. Attn: Mr. Jay Lingnell 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 RE: Hershev Pasta Group Site Plan. Dear Mr. Lingnell: This letter regards our telephone conversation of February 27, 1992. The basis of that conversation was to finalize all requirements for final site plan approval. Our department received a comment sheet from the County Engineer on February 27, 1992. That letter stated that the hydraulic calculations submitted for the box culverts under Park Center Drive and the railroad embankment were approved. The letter went on to say that the County would need copies of the revised drawings for these design details. Please submit six (6) copies of revised sheet C-34 and sheet C-52 to the Frederick County Planning Department to my attention. I will implement the revised sheets into the site plans that our office received on February 18, 1992. This will preclude SSOE from submitting six (6) complete sets of plans to our department. As we discussed, the Hershey Pasta Group Site Plan is technically approved at this time. Frederick County will sign -off on any permit necessary to accommodate H.B. Alexander with construction. Once I receive copies of revised sheet C-34 and sheet C-52, I will approve the plans and provide a copy to the Hershey Foods Corporation, SSOE, INC., and H.B. Alexander. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter, or if I may be of any assistance. Sincerel/yJ, J�t— Evan1JA. Wyatt Planner II THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 w oo2 - 92 1► FEB 1 g WZ SSOE, Inc. Engineers Architects 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Phone: (419) 255-3830 Fax: (419) 255-6101 TO: Dept. -of Plannin4 & Development Letter of Transmittal Date: 2-14- 92 Job No.: 911173-50 Transmittal No.: S-021492-383 ATTN: Mr. Evan A. :Wyatt County of Frederick RE: Project Harvest 9 N. Loudoun Street, P.O. Box 601 Site Plan Application Winchester, VA 22601 We are sending you the following via: Regular Mail Overnight Mail ® Under Separate Cover Hand Delivered Pickup El Item Oty. Code Rev. Dwg./Spec. No. Title/Description 1 6 A-5 See Attached Drawing List 2 1 D-5 Site Plan Application Comments 3 1 D-5 Site Plan Application (2 pages) 4 1 D-5 Applicants Checklist (3 pages) 5 1 D-5 VDOT Comment Sheet 6 1 D-5 William H. Bushman Letter 7 1 D-5 Building Official (John Trenary) Comments 8 1 1 D-5 County Engineer (Ed Strawsnyder) Comments 9 1 D-5 Ed Strawsnyder Letter 10 1 D-5 County Sanitary Authority (John Whitacre) Comments 1-11-11 1 D-5 Fire Marshall (Doug Kiracofe) Comments (2 page CODES: A - Print B - Sepia Reproduction C - Mylar Reproduction D - Copy E - Specification F - Shop Drawing Sub. No. G - Diskette H - 1 - For Construction 2 - For Purchasing 3- For Bids, due 4 - Reference Only 5 - For Approval 6- For Review & Comment 7 - As Requested 8 - For Your Use 9- A/E Review - No Exceptions 10 - AiE Review - As Noted 11 - A/E Review - Rejected 12 - Resubmit Copies 1 3 - Preliminary 14 - Addendum No. 15 - Bulletin No. 16- REMARKS: Refer to site plan application comments. A check for $3,814.08 has been sent to you from H. B. Alexander to cover site plan review fee. Transmittal, Application & Comments: _ cc: E. Buchan - HFC J. Trenary - Fredericl: Signed: B. DeFiore - HBA County J. Wilmot - Frederick County R. Childress - VDOT D. Kiracofe - Frederick County H. E. Strawsnyder - Frederick County J. Whitacre - Frederick County file i Jay /T. Lingnel�, /12.A. Project Manager Page 1 of 1 EXCEL\FORMS\TRANSMIT XLW I� FEB 1 8I'L �1 SITE PLAN APPLICATION------ - -_.. Cornlete the following application• DATE January 13, 1992 APPLICATION n I. Development Ft. Collier Industrial Park 2. Location of Property: 540 Park Center Drive (by street name) Winchester, Virginia 3. Property Owner: Hershey Pasta Group Address: 100 Crystal Drive Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-OFIO Telephone: _(717) 534-5711 4. Applicant/Agent: H.B. Alexander & Son, Inc. Address: 750 Brooke Road Winchester, Virginia 22601 Telephone: (703) 678-1505 5. Designer: SSOE Inc. Address: 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Telephone: _(419) 255-3830 Contact: Jay Lin£nell/ Dennis Lechlak 6. Is this an original or revised Site Plan? Original Revised R -5- • • � ��iZ �h,rl ll.i.BI' i oG �a -9a �r COUNTY of FREDERICK ` Department of Planning and Development 1 703/665-5651 ' FAX 703/678-0682 January 27, 1991 Mr. Jay Lingnell SSOE, Inc. 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 RE: Project Harvest Site Plan Review. Dear Mr. Lingnell: I am writing to you regarding the above referenced site plan. Hopefully, this letter will explain where all parties stand in this review process. To date, all Frederick County review agencies have met with representatives of SSOE Inc., H.B. Alexander and Hershey Foods Corporation. Meetings held on December 10, 1991 and December 12, 1991 enabled all parties to document all necessary requirements for final site plan approval. SSOE Inc., provided the Frederick County Planning Department with six (6) copies of the revised site plan and four (4) copies of the site plan application on January 3, 1992. I provided Mr. Robert DeFiore of H.B. Alexander with two (2) copies of the site plans to use on site. I also provided Mr. H. Edward Strawsnyder with a copy of the revised site plan so he could proceed with his review. Our department created a site plan file for this project on January 13, 1992. Our objective was to include this site plan on the Frederick County Planning Commission's bimonthly report for their February 5, 1992 meeting. This is required by our legislative bodies before administrative approval authority is given to staff. I spoke with representatives of all review agencies today. Mr. Robert B. Childress from the Virginia Department of Transportation informed me that he had talked with Mr. Dennis Lechlak of SSOE Inc., yesterday to confirm all necessary revisions. According to the December 18, 1991 letter drafted by Mr. Childress, no review of the proposed rail spur has been undertaken. Mr. Childress told me that he would attempt to expedite his review of the revised site plan; however, he had no control over the rail spur issue. The rail spur issue needs to be resolved prior to final site plan approval. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Page -2- Lingnell Ltr. January 27, 1992 Mr. John Whitacre, from the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, provided me with an approved site plan review comment today. Mr. Whitacre told me that his department will require sewage meter plans from your firm; however, that would not hold up his approval for this project. I took the liberty of submitting a site plan review sheet to Mr. John Trenary, Frederick County Building Official, for his comments. Although his primary responsibility is to 'review the structural plans to insure conformance with all applicable building codes, he is still required to comment on the use group category that all proposed buildings will fall under. Enclosed is a copy of his comment sheet for your records. Mr. Douglas Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshal, has informed me that he can provide approval for his portion of the site plan review. Mr. Kiracofe would like to receive one (1) set of the final revised site plan for his files. Mr. H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services is currently reviewing the revised site plan. He informed me that our department should receive correspondence from his office within the next day or so. All required revisions based on my review have been adequately addressed. Phase I allowed all review agencies to evaluate the entire site with the exception of the area set aside for the future construction of a mill. The mill site will be reviewed at a later date. The site plan does not provide a height for the future warehouse. Section 3-1-2.1.3 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows automated storage facilities to be one hundred (100) feet in height. As stated earlier, I, have received the site plan application. I will need to receive all approved review agency comments, the site plan review fee of $3,814.08 and six (6) copies of the final revised site plan. This will allow me to provide an approved site plan to Hershey Foods Corporation and SSOE Inc., as well as provide two (2) approved site plans to the job site and retain two (2) for Frederick County. • Page -3- Lingnell Ltr. January 27, 1992 Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter or be of any assistance. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW enclosure cc: Edward G. Buchan, P.E., Hershey Foods Corporation Robert J. DeFiore, H.B. Alexander June A. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Robert B. Childress, Virginia Department of Transportation H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services John G. Whitacre, Frederick County Sanitation Authority John S. Trenary, Frederick County Building Official Douglas A. Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshal SITE PLAN APPLICATION Conulete the following application• DATE January 13, 1992 APPLICATION # to0.2-9t 1. Development Ft. Collier Industrial Park 2. Location of Property: 540 Park Center Drive (by street name) Winchester, Virginia 3. Property Owner: Hershey Pasta Group Address: 100 Crystal Drive Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0810 Telephone: (717) 534-5711 4. Applicant/Agent: H.B. Alexander & Son, Inc. Address: 750 Brooke Road Winchester, Virginia 22601 Telephone: (703) 678-1505 5. Designer: SSOE Inc. Address: 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Telephone: (419) 255-3830 Contact: Jay Lingnell/ Dennis Lechlak original or revised Site Plan? 1 Original i( Revised • ` W / 31992 -5- 0 0 3 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: 82.136 Acres 8. Property Information: I °� Z, a) Property ID #:(Not Established) Parent Tract 54-A-36A b) Current Zoning: M-1 c) Present Use: Agricultural / Pasture d) Proposed Use: Pasta Production Facility e) Adjoining Property Zoning: M-1, MH-1, RA f) Adjoining Property Use: Agricultural/Pasture/Vacant g) Magisterial District: Stonewall District I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site plan. Signature: f`p L� Date: I/ COUNTY of FREDFRICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703//678-0682 February 13, 1992 Miller Milling Company Attn: Mr. Herbert G. Miller 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 RE: Mailing Address For Proposed Mill Site. Dear Mr. Miller: Mrs. June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development, asked that our department assign an address for the proposed mill on the Hershey property. The address assigned to your business is 542 Park Center Drive, Winchester, Virginia 22601. This is a temporary address which will allow you to receive mail at this location. Frederick County is working towards an enhanced county -wide emergency 911 system. This task requires all existing roads in our county to be named and assigned numbers based on a computer model. This system will go on-line on July 1, 1992. At that time, all addresses will become permanent. If you are interested in receiving mail at this location, the address provided above will serve that purpose. I would suggest that you wait until after July 1, 1992 to print envelopes, letterhead, etc., as this address may change. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter or be of any assistance. Sincerely, E""1 a_. ? Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Mark D. LeMasters, Graphics Design Technician THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 SSOE, Inc. Engineers Architects 1001 Vadison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Phone: (419) 255-3830 Fax: (419) 255-6101 TO: County of Frederick Dept. of Planning & Development 9 Court Square l4inchester, VA 22601 Letter of Transmittal Date: 1-10-92 Transmittal No.: S011092-308 Job No.: 911173-02 ATTN: Mr. Evan A. Wyatt Planner I/Zoning Inspector RE: Project Harvest We are sending you the following via: Regular Mail Overnight Mail © Under Separate Cover Hand Delivered Pickup Item Oty. Code Rev. Dwg./Spec. No. Title/Description 1 4 A-16 Refer to Attached Drawing List CODES: A - Print B - Sepia Reproduction C - Mylar Reproduction D - Copy E - Specification F - Shop Drawing Sub. No. G - Diskette H- REMARKS: 1 - For Construction 2 - For Purchasing 3 - For Bids, due 4 - Reference Only 5 - For Approval 6 - For Review & Comment 7 - As Requested B - For Your Use 9 - A/E Review - No Exceptions 10 - AiE Review - As Noted 11 - A/E Review - Rejected 12 - Resubmit Copies 13 - Preliminary 14 - Addendum No. 15 - Bulletin No. 16 - For Parmi t. cc: E. Buchan - HFC Signed: B. DeFiore - HBA Jay T. Lingnell, R.A. file Project Manager Page 1 of 2 EXCEL\FORMS\TRANSMIT.XLW • DESIGN PACKAGE NO. 1 PROJECT HARVEST DRAWING LIST C-31 OVERALL SITE PLAN C-33 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-34 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-35 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-36 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-37 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-38 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-39 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-40 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-41 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-42 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-43 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-44 C-45 SITE DETAILS C-4_6 _SITE DETAILS C-47 CONCRETE JOINING &_PAVEMENT STRIPING PLAN C-48 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE C-50 _PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-51 C-52 C-53 PARTIAL RAILROAD_ PLAN_ AND PROFILE PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-54 C-55 RAILROAD_ DETAILS C-ES-1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-ES-2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-ES-3 JEROSION CONTROL DETAILS COUNTY of FREDERICK Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works July 6, 1993 9 North Loudoun St., 2nd Floor 703/665-5643 Mr. John E. Gast Greenway, Inc. 970 Baker Lane Winchester, Virginia 22603 RE: Revised Site Plan for Miller Milling, Ft. Collier Industrial Park Dear John: We have completed our review of the revised storm water plan for the proposed development on the Miller Milling site. Basically, these revisions include the use of drainage swales and drop inlets to accommodate storm water flows. A review of the drainage calculations indicates that the drainage structures and related piping have been designed to accommodate the proposed future development. It is anticipated that DI-7 type drop inlets will be employed at all locations marked CB. The site work contractor may proceed with construction of the proposed storm water drainage system. It is anticipated that only minor regrading will be required to adapt this sytem to future on site development. During our review of the revised drainage plan, we observed that the 20 foot wide fire lane will be displaced by future development. This development should be discussed with the Fire Marshal to determine the overall impact on future fire coverage. We understand that Greenway, Inc. is preparing a revised site plan to reflect the relocation of the fire main feeding the office and warehouse area. We request that we be furnished a copy of this revised plan for our records. Sincerely, A- Harve Strawsnyder, Jr. P.E. Director of Public Works HES:bjn cc: Evan Wyatt, Planning and Zoning Doug Kiracofe, Fire & Rescue Fax: 703/678-0682 - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22604 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 December 9, 1991 Mr. Dennis A. Lechlak SSOE, INC. 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 RE: Protect Harvest Site Plan Review. Dear Mr. Lechlak: I have finished my review of the above referenced site plan. The overall concept of the design and layout are fine; however, there are some issues that need to be clarified prior to final site plan approval. I will try to convey this information as clearly as possible: 1. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION 7✓ ) Please indicate zoning of site (#13). b) Specify zoning and use of all adjoining properties (#14). 2. LOTS/USES/BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES ✓ a) Provide total acreage for this project (#16). ✓ b) Please indicate required setbacks for structures (#17). ,/c) Provide calculations for Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for this project (#21). V d) Please indicate the height of all structures (#22). e) Show the location of any signs on site (#23). f) If there are anyvbutdoor lighting fixtures, Outdoor storage areas or,/outdoor trash receptacles proposed for this project, please indicate their location (#24, #25, #29). If these items will not be located on site, please reflect that in the General Notes section. 3. ROADS a) The information provided on the site plan is fine, but will require final approval from the Virginia Department of Transportation. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • Page -2- Lechlak Ltr. December 9, 1991 4. PARKING ✓a) Please provide calculations that indicate the required number of parking spaces, loading spaces and handicapped spaces (#37). �b) Please show the location and dimensions for all required loading spaces (#38). 5. NATURAL FEATURES a) If there are any natural environmental features indicated under #41 of the Applicant's Checklist, please provide their location on this site plan. If none of these features exist, please specify under General Notes. 6. LANDSCAPING a) Please provide a landscaping plan (sheet C-32) that shows the required parking lot landscaping and any landscaping on site (#43). b) Indicate all buffer areas on site (#44). I believe that there is a buffer area along the southern property boundary. Please revise your site plan to include these comments. Once you have received final site plan approval from the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, the Frederick County Building Official and the Frederick County Engineer, I will need to receive the following: 1) The site plan application. 2) All approved review agency comment sheets. 3) The site plan review fee.. 4) Four (4) copies of the final site plan for approval. I hope this review is beneficial to your work. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, & . a - bif�— Evan A. Wyatt Planner II APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST Your site plan should include the following: Administrative Information Y N 1. Name of proposed development Cv5 — 2. Name and address of owner Cv5 ✓ _ 3. Name and address of developer Cv 5 _ 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer Cv5 Z _ 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect CvS — 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions 14A 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval Cv5 — 8. A space labeled "approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval General Site Information Y N C�/5 ✓ _ 9. Location map (scale 1:2000) Cv 5 _ 10. Magisterial District of site C 33_ 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 12. North Arrow 13. Zoning of site 14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures Y N C-31 / _ 15. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels 16. Acreage of all lots included in the plan 17. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas C-31 V, _ 18. Location of all buildings, structures, and uses C-31 ✓ _ 19. The proposed use of each building, structure, and area Z 20. The location and type of all dwelling units 21. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts 22. The height of all buildings and structures 1 23. The location and dimension of all signs 7 E I* 1 Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures (con't) Y N A A Roads Y N Utilities Y C-f WV 24. Location of outdoor lighting fixtures 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas 26. Location and area of common open space 27. Location and description of all recreation facilities 28. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways 29. Location of outdoor trash receptacles ok 30. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site 31. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads 33. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways — 34. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals — 35. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility and drainage easements 36. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet the Fire Code 'requirements Parking Y N C-47 ✓ 37. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces 38. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing, and other features to be used 39. Location and dimension of all handicapped spaces I-J 0 t • Natural Features Y N '4t/ 40. Existing and finished contour lines % 41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features L-31 _ 42. Location of streams and drainage ways Landscaping Y N 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used _ 44. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles ! �vT-R,� gav�1�' ? Erosion and Sediment Control Y N 45. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of — facilities to be used 46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with location, types, and examples of provisions to be used TT A COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 September 24, 1991 SSOE, INC. Attn: Mr. Dennis A. Lechlak 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 RE: Preliminary Site Plan Meeting. Dear Mr. Lechlak: The purpose of this letter is to summarize our meeting of September 24, 1991. Hopefully, this letter will assist your staff in the preparation of the Hershey Pasta site plan. The plan review process may be thought of in three (3) stages: grading plans, structural plans and site plans. The reason for this is to plan for on -site work while the site plan is being reviewed. - Grading plans should be submitted to Mr. Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services. Once the grading plans have been approved and appropriate fees have been paid, Frederick County will issue a land disturbance permit. This permit allows for site clearing, grading and compaction, provided that all appropriate erosion and sediment control measures are in place and well maintained. All structural plans should be submitted to the department of Engineering and Building. These plans can be sent to the attention of Mr. Ed--Strawsnyder or Mr. John Trenary, Frederick County Building Official. The structural plans will be reviewed to insure that all structural, electrical, plumbing, mechanical and fire codes have been met. Frederick County will issue a footer foundation_permit once these plans are reviewed. This allows for continued construction after site preparation is complete. Site plans -should be submitted to the Department of Planning and Development to my attention. Included with the site plans should be the site plan application (found on page 5 and 6 in the application package), the appropriate site plan review fee (made payable to -the Treasurer of Frederick County) and the required comments sheets. The required review agencies for this project are the Virginia Department of Transportation, the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County Engineering Department, the Frederick County Inspections Department and the Frederick County Fire Marshal. All comment sheets are provided in the THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 0 0 page -2- D. Lechlak Ltr. Sept. 24, 1991 application package, and need to have the first, second and third informational items completed. At the bottom of each comment sheet is the required number of site plans for submittal (I count eleven including my plan). All review agencies will review your site plan and send their comments to SSOE, INC. Any required revisions should be provided on a revised site plan for final review. Once all review agencies have approved the site plan, I will need four (4) copies of the final site plan for approval. Frederick County will keep two (2) copies, one (1) will be provided to Hershey, and SSOE, INC. will receive the final copy. I will ask_ Mr. Strawsnyder to provide you with a copy of the memorandum specifying the required turn -around time for county agency plans review for this project. All questions related to the site plan should be addressed to Mr. Strawsnyder or myself. I will be on vacation September 30 - October 4, 1991; therefore, any questions you may have during that time period should be addressed to Mr. Strawsnyder or Mr. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Zoning Administrator. I hope this letter is beneficial to your work. Please contact me if I may be of any assistance. Sincerely, n � Evan A. Wyatt Planner II cc: Kenneth Y. Stiles, Board of Supervisors Chairman James W. Golladay, Jr., Planning Commission Chairman John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmot, Executive Director of Economic Development Robert W. Watkins, Frederick County Planning Director W. Wayne Miller, Frederick County Zoning Administrator H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services John R. Trenary, Frederick County Building Official Don McIlvaine -1. ,r �STRUNTON DISTRICT % MEMORANDUM - TEL:703-332-9179 COMMQNWEAt7N OF VIRWNIA DEPARTMENT OF 14IGHWAYS AND TRANSP013TATION August 1, 1978 Agricultural and Forestal Districts Act To: Mr. 0. P. Royer, Jr. Enclosed for your inforntation is a copy of House Bill 949 "The Agricultural and Forestal Districts Act" which became effective July 1, 1977, House Bill 949 provides the mechanism for creating locally initiated and controlled Agricultural and Forestal Districts and provides for their protection, restricting state agencies' power of eminent domain. Under the bill's provisions, landowners can request that their local governing bodies establish a District. Upon receipt of a request, the local governing body establishes an "expert" advisory coinnittee for consultation, makes the proposal available for public review, holds a public hearing, and then decides whether the proposed District shall be Established. The creation of a pistrici limits the Department's power of eminent domain therein by placing restrictions on the number of acres which can be acquired from an individual landowner (if acre*) and the District "� (10* acres), without first fi11ng a Notice of Intent with the local; Co.All. �overning body: The Notice of Intent must be filed 30 days prior io the ,cs proposed action.explaining why .the proposal is necessary and including alternatives which would not impact the District. Within 30.days, the local governing body ::rust roview the proposed actiop. 1fa it is felt that the proposal will have undesirable impact on the District, the, review period may be extended 60 days and a public hearing will beheld. If the local governing body decides against the Department's proposed action, the DepartmG;rt can appeal the decision to the circuit court. STAUNTON DISTRICT TEL:703-332-9179 Mar 01 95 14:08 No.005 P.03 1.1512 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL D1$TRiCTS ACT § 16.1-1512 w as that established when the district was created. (1977, c. 681; 1979, 7; 1981, C. 546; 1984, c. 20; 1985, C. 13; 1987, c. 552.) Editor's note. — Acts 1987. c. 652, cl. 2 vides that the net shall not invalidate sting agricultural and forestal districts mod prior to the effective date (July 1, 1987) the act. [Ise 1984 amendment, in this section as it 0 prior to the amendment by Acts 1987. c. 2, •ubstituted "However" for "Provided, how- er, that in the second sentence of subsection and substituted "Commonwealth" for "State"; and inserted "town" in the fifth sen. tence of subsection A. The 1985 amendment, in this section as it read prior to the amendment by Acts 1987, c. 552, in subsection A substituted "is" for "be" preceding "a person, partnership association near the beginning of the second sentence, and in subsection E added the second sentence. The 1987 asnend[nent rewrote this section. 'r any within a district and n H,:k, $ 15.1.1512. Effects of districts. -- A. Land lying istric•t in agricultural or forestal production shall automatically qualify for an mit :� cultural or forestal use -value assessment on such land pursuant to Article �' :�ncl ($ 58.1-3229 et seq.) of Chapter 32 of Title 68.1, if the requirements for such •timer ssment contained therein are satisfied. Any ordinance adopted pursuant shall § 15.1-1509 shall extend such use -value assessment and taxation to eligible map. al property within such district whether or not a local ordinance pursuant to map, 4 58.1-3231 has been adopted. B. No local government shall exercise any of its powers to enact local laws ict by or ordinances within a district in a manner which would unreasonably restrict Such travention or regulate farm structures or farming and forestry practices in lations bear a v Of of the purposes of this chapter unless such restrictions or regu direct relationship to public health and safety. The comprehensive plan and rested zoning and subdivision ordinances shall be applicable within said districts, to n four the extent that such ordinances are not in conflict with the conditions to Y four creation or continuation of the district set forth in the ordinance creating or iew at continuing the district or the purposes of this chapter. Nothing in this ate chapter en the shall affect the authority of the local govermn body to regulate shall processing or retail sales of agricultural or forestal products, or structures nning therefor, in accordance with the local comprehensive plan or anylocallocal ntinue ordinances. Local ordinances, comprehensive plans, land use planning I of land eci- ay be lions, administrative decisions and procedures affecting p e local adjacent to any district shall take into account the existence of such district ify or and the purposes of this chapter. viKory C. It shall be the policy of all a encies of the Commonwealth to encourage th the the maintenance of farming and forestry in districts and all administrative eeting regulations and procedures of such agencies shall be modified to this end to the insofar as is consistent with the romo ion of public health and safety and by the p standards, criteria, rules, if , or with the provisions of an federal statutes. riot at including provisions applicable onicies, and ly to obtaother ining ng federuir al grants loans ements of federal or other g body including pr PP istrict. funding. ens of the Commonwealth or any political subdivision which - w. The to Any ag Y ct and intends to acquire land st or y interest such age cy orrtpol political subdivision where such or �� is by gift, devise, bequest titre land or any interest �6 1 nay be any public service corporation which in to acquire ct was therein for public utility facilities not subject to approval by the farm tor o notice Corporation Commission, rovided that the iQuisitiou ro d in a or t at t o vv�. u- DID or w isweeks secion within the district w e in exceor other funds within a ov trict is in ens to a vance a grant, oan, interest su sty ntinue district for the construction of dwellings, commercial or industrial facilities, e next water or sewer facilities to serve no structures, shall at least thirty days hatSl �AJ 307 STHUPJTON DISTRICT TEL:703-332-9179 Mar 01 95 14:09 No.005 P.04 § 15.1-1513 COUNTIES, CITIES AND TOWNS § 1-lril:i 15.1-1513 AGRICULT �(°, 01` 1 Tanning commissio prior to s ction file a t with , l ens and shall hold a pul containing suchIn orma(ton and in such manner an form as such boy mx; � require or prescribe. Such notice of intent shall contain a report detailing :t�l re-evaluated through th reasons in justification for the proposed action including, but not limited tn, seeking to withdraw lar an evaluation of alternatives which would not require action within thi• governing body, shall ha, district. court serving the terrltot Upon receipt of such notice; the local governing body, in consultation with no way affect the ability the local planning commission and the advisory committee, shall review th'e district or withdraw fr proposed action to determine the effect such action would have upon the subsection F of § 1 preservation and enhancement of agriculture and forestry and agricultural B. Upon termination on and forestal resources within the district and the policy of this chapter and to» from a district created 1 determine the necessity of the proposed action to provide service to the public roll -back taxes as are in the most economical and practicable manner.C. Upon termination If the local governing body finds that such proposed action might hauls anland from a district, tdinances prohibited I unreasonably adverse effect upon either state or local policy, the lucal ' orUpon the death of governing body shall issue an order within such thirty -day period to such D. cotenant personal re agency, corporation or political subdivision directing the agency, corporation in land lying within i or political subdivision not to take the proposed action for an additional period withdraw such land fro of sixty days immediately following such thirty -day period.' i land provided that s fro 1. During such additional sixty-day period, the local governing body shall hold a public hearing, as prescribed by law, concerning such proposed action where representative files w the local governingbody usually meets or at a place otherwise easily body and the local com accessible to the district upon notice in a newspaper having a general death of the owner - circulation within the district, and individual notice, in writing, to thv E. Upon terminatlo political subdivisions whose territory encompasses or is part of the district, removal of any parcel and the agency, corporation or political subdivision proposing to take such submit a copy of tl action. Before the conclusion of such additional sixty-day period the local commissioner of revel governing body shall make its decision as to whether such proposed action Agriculture and Con! will have an adverse effect upon such state or local policy and whether such sioner of revenue sha proposed action is necessary to provide service to the public in the most book and the tax r. economical and practicable manner, and it shall, by the issuance of a final identification of suct order, report its decision to the agency, corporation or political subdivision F. The withdrawa proposing to take such action. In the event that such agency, corporation, or constituted district s poetical subdivision is aggrieved by the final order of the local governng district. Such distric- body, an appeal shall lie to the circuit court having jurisdiction of the territory whether it should wherein a majority of the land affected by the acquisition is located. However, § 15.1-1511 of this c if such public service corporation is regulated by the State Corporation 552.) Commission, an appeal shall be to the State Corporation Commission. E. No special district for sewer, water or electricity or for nonfarm or Editor's note. — Act nonforest drainage may impose benefit assessments or special tax levies on provides that the act the basis of frontage, acreage or value on land used for primarily agricultural existing agricultural a or forestal production within a district, except a lot not exceeding one-half formed prior to the effect acre surrounding any dwelling or nonfarm structure located on such land. of the act. However, such benefit assessment or special ad valorem levies may continue The 1985 amendmen if imposed prior to the formation of the district. (1977, c. 681; 1979, c. 377; 1987. c. 552.) Editor's note. — Acts 1987. c. 552. ct. 2 formed prior to the effective date (July 1, 1987) provides that the act shall not invalidate of the act. existing agricultural and forestal districts The 1987 amendment rewrote this section. § 15.1-1513. Withdrawal of land from a district, --- A. At any time after the creation of a district within any locality, any owner of land lying in such district may file, with the local governing body that created the district, a written request to withdraw all or part of such land from such district for good and reasonable cause. The local governing body shall refer such request to the 308 P TO DATE _ TIME 00 AM P "- FROM, --AREA CODE NO. I EXT. OF c E M S S E A M O c E SIGNS � PHONED BALL CALL NED SEEWANTS TO AGAINALL WAS IN URGENT MAR- 7-95 TUE 11:47 FREDICK CO CT COMMONS 17OS6780682 P_03 LAM DISTUR$IN(# PERMIT ISSUED TO: - PERRY 7 who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick It County Department of Planning and Development. AGREEMENT This agreement, made this 21 sT day of NDVEmBER 1991, by and between _PERRY FNG1NFFRTNr Party(s) of the first part, and the County of Frederick , Virginia, party of the second part. Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for the PRrt =-r PADWCOT D, tl___ n. _ of `(actual disturbed acres) and the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction and before final occupancy, the party(s) of the first part or his heirs/assigns agree to do the following work: 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction and to provide for conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. Z- To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and sedimentation Control Plan. MAR 07 '95 10:13 17036780682 PAGE.003 MAR- 7-95 TUE 11:47 FREDICK CO CT COMMONS 17036780682 M--C The party (s) of the First part does further agree that an agent of Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in %the approved plan. In testimony whereof', the party of the first part has hereunto caused .its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. PERRY ENGINEERING CORPOR-kTION In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf by County of Frederick, Virginia +1 B Y . Feeder a County Department of Planning and Development ,NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of a site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. MAR 07 '95 10:13 170367806e2 PAGE.002 4 MAR— 7-95 TUE 11:47 FREDTCK CO CT COMMONS 17OS6780682 P-01 t —3— STATE' OF VIRGINIA COUNTY Or FREDERICA T, DPRT' a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my said County, (name) SUSAN FRITCH of (company) and SE,ER I Of the Frecrerick County Department and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated INOVEMBER 21, M did personally appear before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this ZIST rlaL- „f E ZLL Notary public My Commission expires on SEPT, 30, 1993 1 :134 M Post -it' Fax Note 7671 Date. pages", ToT Da / ♦1nc, r From Co.1150pi. Co. Phone# Phone Bn 7 Fax k 12 p �(1 r 7 Fex 1 I7 03 "&D I MAR 07 '95 10:12 17036780s82 PAGE.001 STRUNTON DISTRICT TEL:703-332-9179 MEMORANDUM COMMONWC/%LTH OF Vlgfi+NIA DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS AND TRANSP011TATION August 1, 1978 Agricultural and Forestal District's Act To: tsar. J. P. Royer, Jr. Enclosed For your information is a copy of House gill 90 "The Agricultural and Forestal Districts Act" which became effective duly 1, 1977, House Dill 949 provides the mechaoism for creating locally initiated and controlled Agricultural and Forestal Districts and provides for their Protection, restricting state agencies' power of eminent domain. Under the bill's provisions, landowners can request that their local governing bodies establish a District, Upon receipt of a request, the local governing body establishes an "expert" advisory comnittee for consultation, Hakes the proposal available for public review, holds a public hearing, and then decides whether the proposed District shall be est<ibl ished. The creation of a District limits the Department's power of eminent domain therein by placing rCstrictions on the number of acres which can be acquired from an individual landowner (if acres) and the District (10#-acres), without first filing a Notice of Intent with the local; Co. � °r joverning body« The Notice of Intent must be filed 30 days prior to the � proposed action -explaining why .the proposal is necessary and including alternatives which would not impact the District. Within 30_days,, the local governing body must review the proposed actiop. •Ifi it is felt that the proposal will have undesirable Impact on the District, they - revio4 period may be extended 60 days and a public hearing will be held. If the local governing body decides against the Department s proposed action, the Dupartsaurit can appeal the decision to the circuit court. STAUNTON DISTRICT TEL:703-332-9179 Mar 01 95 14 : Op tJ0 .005 P.03 1.1512 AGRICULTURAL AND FORESTAL DISTRICTS ACT § 15.1-1512 7 as 1981, ate. established 864,vc whenthe 1985,re.t 13�17 created. , 552 j7, c. 681; 1979, Cdlt r's note. — Acts 1987. C. 652, cl. 2 i dt,o, that the act shall not invalidate sting agricultural and forestal districts coed prior to the effective date (July 1, 1987) the act. rho 19M amendment, in this section are it sd prior to the amendment by Acts 1987. c. 2, substituted "However" for "Provided, how- er, that" in the second sentence of subsection and substituted "Commonwealth" for "State"; and inserted "town" in the fifth sen- tence of subsection A. The 19s5 amendment, in this section are it read prior to the amendment by Acts 1981, C. 552, in subsection A substituted "is" for "be" preceding "a person, partnership, association" near the beginning of the second sentence, and in subsection E added the second sentence. The 1987 amendment rewrote this section. 15.1.1512. Effects of districts. -- A. Land lying within a district and Icultural or forestal teed in agr'cultural or forestal use -value assessment oroduction n uch and pursuant to Articfor le tgric if the I 1 essment contaet ined heren are satisfied. Any pter 32 of Title �ordinance uadopted puorsuant tea ;o § 15.1-1509 shall extend such use -value assessment and taxation to eligible ;,-eal property within such district whether or not a local ordinance pursuant to 58.1-3231 has been adopted. B. No local government shall exercise any of its powers to enact local laws or ordinances mtstntcturerestrict s or farm ng and forestry practices a district in a manner �vhich would in contravention or regulate lotions bear a di the purposes of this ublc heal h and safetunless such y. The comprehensive plan and direct relationship top applicable within said districts, to zoning and subdivision ordinances shall be app the extent that such ordinances are not in conflict with the conditions to creation or continuation of the district set forth in the ordinance creating or continuing the district or the purposes of this chapter.. Nothying in this chapter e shall affect the authorto I ity of L`Cultural local oroforesital r oduc s, orstructures processing or retail sales of agricultural #i therefor, in accordance with the local comprehens>ve plan or any local ordinances. Local ordinances, comprehensive plans, land use planning lanni gland sions, administrative decisions and procedures affecting parcels adjacent to any district shall take into account the existence of such district and the purposes of this cha ter. C. It shall be the policy of all agencies of the Commonwealth to encourage the maintenance of farming and forestry in districts and all administrative agencies shall o this end regulations and r rent with dures s c motion of public health and e modified tsafety and insofar as I standards, criteria, rules, with the provisions of any fe eral statutes, ents of uirem including provisior onlicies, and s applicable only to obtaining other federal grants federal loans or other including p Pp funding. agency of the Commonwealth or any political subdivision which D. Any ag intends to acquire land or any interest therein, except where such acquisition t is by gift, devise, bequest or grant to such agency or political subdivision, or public service corporation which intends to acquire land or ban i Sate o- `r �nterest I � b the n for public utility facilities not subject to app.rova Y C uisition ro�aW� ne farm or , Corporation ommission, rovided that the ini sa or t at t e v� or w is total sition within the district w e in excess other funds within a i 0 in en s to a vanes a grant, oan, Interest su st y o district for the construction of dwellings, commercial or industrial facilities,i G water or sewer facilities to serve nonfarm structures, shall at least thirty days tS 307 A-0 THUh;1TOf'J'III STP I CT TEL : 7 03-.332-91?Ci Pear 01 95 14:09 No.005 P.04 § 15.1-1513 COUNTIES, CITIES AND TOWNS § 1 ,1.1Cil.y 1b.1-1513 AGRICULT C4. J prior to such —action file a t with local tannin commissio p g tions and shall hold a put con fining Sue inform aton and in such manner an to as such boy rnav '� through th require or prescribe. Such notice of intent shall contain a report detailing iii re-evaluated to withdraw gar reasons in justification for the proposed action including, but not limited cis, seeking shall an evaluation of alternatives which would not require action within thi" ng the to court serving the teiTitAt court servverninging district. �. Upon receipt of such notice, the local governing body, in consultation with no affec t the ability district or withdraw fY the local planning commission and the advisory committee, shall review th"t. F of § 15.1- proposed action to determine the effect such action would have upon the subsection B. Upon termination preservation and enhancement of agriculture and forestry and agricultural from a district created F and forestal resources within the distriot and the policy of this chapter and t<,�r roll -back taxes are determine the necessity of the proposed action to provide service to the public Upon termination in the most economical and practicable manner.' If the local governing body finds that such proposed action might havA an nd from a district, f land ordinances prohibited unreasonably adverse effect upon either state or local policy, the local ' D. Upon the death ai governing body shall issue an order within such thirty -day period to such cotenant personal re agency, corporation or political subdivision directing the agency, corporation subdivision to take the action for an additional period in land lying within ; i lying or political not proposed of sixtydays immediate) following such thirty-dayeriod. y y g p withdraw such land fro land provided that suc During such additional sixty-day period, the local governing body shall hold hearing, by law, concerning such proposed action where � representative files w a public as prescribed the local governingbody usually meets or at a place otherwise easily in having a bed and the local com y death of the owner. accessible to the district upon notice a newspaper general circulation within the district, and individual notice, in writing, to thv E. Upon terminatio arcel political subdivisions whose territory encompasses or is part of the district, removal of any parcel a copy t] and the agency, corporation or political subdivision proposing to take suet, action. Before the conclusion of such additional sixty-day period the local submit commissioner of revei Con, governing body shall make its decision as to whether such proposed action Agriculture and of revenue sha will have an adverse effect upon such state or local policy and whether such sioner book and the tax r proposed action is necessary to provide service to the public in the most economical and practicable manner, and it shall, by the issuance of a final identification of sucl order, report its decision to the agency, corporation or political subdivision F. The withdraws, district s proposing to take such action, In the event that such agency, cororation or is by the final order of the local- governing; constituted district. Such distric- golitical subdivision aggrieved body, an appeal shall lie to the circuit court having jurisdiction of the territor} whether it should § 15.1-1611 of this c wherein a majority of the land affected by the acquisition is located. However, 552.) if such public service corporation is regulated by the State Corporation Commission, an appeal shall be to the State Corporation Commission. Act E. No special district for sewer, water or electricity or for nonfarm or Editor's note. that the act nonforest drainage may impose benefit assessments or special tax levies on the basis of frontage, acreage or value on land used for primarily agricultural provides existing agricultural a to the effect or forestal production within a district, except a lot not exceeding one-half acre surrounding any dwelling or nonfarm structure located on such land. formed prior of the act. 1985 amendmen However, such benefit assessment or special ad valorem levies may continue 377; The if imposed prior to the formation of the district. (1977, c. 681; 1979, c. 1987, c. 552.) Editor's note. — Acts 1987, c. 552, cl. 2 formed prior to the effective date (July 1, 1987) provides that the act shall not invalidate of the act, existing agricultural and forestal districts The 1987 amendment rewrote this section. § 15.1-1513. Withdrawal of land from a district. -- A. At any time after the creation of a district within any locality, any owner of land lying in such district may file, with the local governing body that created the district, a written request to withdraw all or part of such land from such district for good and reasonable cause. The local governing body shall refer such request to the 7 T �T c Zr CT Tnlir E L' i�r --evatcr nc s B a p r za,-',4 : -zd on P'an=T a re:9--:2, -I t t- Z111 -P-2 'OWEf p C a E d w madc zarked ^» plans as ver pianns Gar; _. ._ae_== =t 7 rl r, + i - - 2 r d n u, z, 9 r ­x- 'and e�er., z L w z - wal 1 U7 r Z!:7�z ES rep__ i E E r v an-= mar z P--', a ^ t . ma rY e,.-'! cn p, 1 a d m;,, -0' wa 27 r4­ a 1 rema:,_4,iz to be �»s-ected IF I -eb;r: c: 1 al- as Per plans; marked plans 7o: IF rc2ffor tl,nn_-lSEC. Kenneth 7c 1 &P Kenneth B. F,:: IF F :1 needed to__ E U P e r I' t E Z he n E e d 2 I 1.3 1-- L Y h ow h Z to t C 0 nC r eEt t a Uld tO 1 s the :ode at --EE+ .n'Z on Edward S. Emb r e *P rebar His'. Kenneth n � 2 'P Walk 4-1-1 Kenneth F,- IV Kenneth P pr-qres-:z Kenneth F rnI *P res -- Ke-- 2:- IF rebar john 7- 'F r1,eCSs, I i c r m at e IF 7 _7 *P proqreE_ KE:Z� Ver IF N.' KEnnE'� F'1 IP prrqres-c MISC. Kenneth ro: Z V 2 r z F�x IF an" z! d r I n t 7- I C, n, n E A I F E, DATE INISPE:TID:: .?PE 8iQ6%93 Final Mech. 8/0 6 / 3 3 F indi M ec . 8;`061'93 Fins'. MECh 8/0U93 Find: Mech. 8/CE,03 rival Mech. 2; :ire M.reha1 2.':- , Misc. 8/13, :- Misc. 9i 14 ':,; Findi Bl::tu:ng AiirlBIl:r ryceEr ID!! H_3T;F" " 7 V C r-7I-1 K` Private Enrtineering Repor F Private En=ineeri—ra Rer^ - PrivatE Engineering Repor F Fri -ate En^'neer_ _ .._--- r Private Engineering Repor F Private rn:4neEr:-2 �nvlqlas A. Jahn S. T.renary John S. Trenary :P John S. Trenany F Gary E. Georze =F Gar_ E. re:rz= F .. G._c:tr.c: Gary E. Ge=rg= s1 ers se.. .. rrP_r Ire 4e ceva,re': :astene_ tC str,=_..:rl a >uiag Ileor ha^e =-nle whi_.- .. _it2S machine rm dnd .� ,., pr�vie wenti_d.i. natural or mechanical in machinE rm :^ veep eq _?:Ent wii working range: spriakle vll valve outside hoistway of ea5Y acc_=_: ele^at:r power ne=1: =?dnS t: shut nH In of sprinkler acti..t:=-. P:'ovide smoke dEt in eC lobb wz to meet code-E.: -_ ..._ shillO' ^entiidL:Cn as per Cn c requires .cr this .:.=_:.11ation: identily _..connects in m instal' cage dr_..._ mFctine r`m. ladder icr =--_ '--___ tC r3: - _ cct for+a�_ __ W.:-= cant Yee= = = en,_ car .roe :�_-- Provide grad bar on = 1G...=r at :7r hC_stway drs reeri i Pull strap installed on outsi�= cl Ee :cniing to Meet. the 'outside in nninrt the _..__-_ -- -- -__ �•-- u; v= ., ._.,._-, lir2 pr''t=--- n _== =re - = 'an'= ___ =- '_'-_- ck Ir_r temp rt sp +Sr =ha:l no i+Sm wF.''.s'a instaI _ hard._._, __ _ _ C:.rs_`_'.n_ _::: ;nsPe SW DATE T:iSPEC:T�:; "=G':�T. ;'U� EE 1:0'11 7. - ?_ AC T S L _ Y ,1 7 lr T. V 3 k�t:. ... :V.". 1I44 reh3r Ken -_ h 3. ..; *P !Inc Kenneth B. For F Kenneth F. For *P Kennet!: 5. For *➢ eaaet _. Fa. *P Sla F^z *➢ rebar Keane* _. Fcz *P Kennet; _. For 'disc. Keane+} P. F^z *F Mla�. Edward yet^av *P Misc. Keane+h E. Fez *P nisc Kenneth e. For *F ? . :_. Kenneth B. Few *F ,/02 _au Kennet? P. For *P Z/1G;:_ Slab Kenneth Q. For *P 3I01 : s c. Kenneth P, For *P Kenneth E. Foz *➢ 4/ 0 : _ .._3C_. Keane+'n. ?. Fox F 4/091123 Final Bnildiay Kenneth P. Fez F __ :,, M:=_• ..sane+.. '_'. :';,. *' ..FLU;..: bar: _. :7fnr^e *P Keane+h P. Fez *P 6, 4/9? :.re Ma L•rshal D las A. Kiracofe *P *F 9I06/9 3 .ia3. M h. Pri._`_ ineering �epc� 7t"1 ray r :nrt 11 n^..p _ 11 ^r nsn:n i a h .. .--..--__:n, .._ _ . �.a e_ F... _rl?; a . £ rei..�.�._t. 7 t h 11. _lab: steel __ m ace 7th fl rebar in 713,.E rehar: nIn iUtt__ _-_ a'_: =te_1 i13C� wal, +?:r+_ walk tl'r. bin bet+^.._----nc. rea'�•; roof bin bottoms roof; all reinforcing steel in place per Flans walk th-1 walk! +hr_ clay lC r1z need eaC ___ .rt in core ^•'ll:ng on tth and St, ill; that CUt 1L+ :'et? Sea.'". FiniE.. hardware Star' i_ S from SllaS nee= E_= report on _=ra dr:..=. }ale_ that aer: °,ran: 1, +Zn_or^rnu4r discoaze t I to ,sans Pau wale +hr: hydra; ?r; 7'e :l bF, ^ress:r_ 2T4 psi a+ oat'; ending at :_1 psi for 111c. C. r= cz =:i: ha.73a:a and pi=:L_ zer Ippr— r harddwar2 3t=+3._=, lab 1`_r_i.'= --- = --'` -- ° ------ -•---n In M'`-` --- -- -�'3n�° -'-_.. ..._a she' = et'. ._...e a s rune - .W S. h.. lJSGre s__=:.-. �: _ __ _':.:_ .___�_ .•.= far:= _. �.� .�� .__ _,.. March 15, 1995 Mr. James Duffy O'Conner Maslon, Edelman, Borman and Brand 3300 Norwest Center 90 S. 7th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402-4140 COUNTY of FREDERICK Inspections Department John S. Trenary, Building Official 703/665-5656 Fax:703/678-0682 RE: Memo dated March 9, 1995, from Evan A. Wyatt, planner, and Permits 1119-92 & 351-93 Dear Mr. O'Conner: One of the preliminary meetings regarding the construction of the Miller Milling building in Frederick County focused on the classification of the mill according to use group in the 1990 BOCA National Building Code. There was a discussion concerning whether the building should be classified as Use Group "F" (factory) or Use Group "H" (high hazzard) due to the hazardous dust involved. At that time, we informed the parties present that the design engineer would have to evaluate the buildings and products for use group classification under BOCA and present documentation to show the lesser restrictive factory use classification could be accepted. This question was never presented again to the best of my knowledge. At a later date, the plans and permits were applied for in the following use groups; "H" (high hazzard) for the mill and grain storage; mixed uses of "B" (business) and "S-1" (storage) for the office building. The BOCA code would permit the above -mentioned use group buildings to be placed on the property in any location, provided the properly designed fire separation walls or firewalls were constructed of the hour ratings set forth in Tables 907, 905.2 and 313.1.2 are complied with. The mill classification of "H" (high hazzard) would require a four-hour firewall rating when adjoined to other buildings. Variables to consider when designing an "H" (high hazzard) building under BOCA would be: a.) minimizing wall exposure to other buildings for safety reasons 107 North Kent Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Miller Milling Letter (page 2) b.) the cost factor in constructing firewalls and protection of the building openings c.) location and release of explosion panels required in high hazzard buildings d.) the location of the building in reference to future expansion or other buildings on site. These items and possibly others may have had an impact on why building site adjustments were made by the designer. In summary, I would like to reiterate that the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code or the BOCA National Building Code would not dictate the location of any building on site, except in regards to buildings being situated in a floodway under the FEMA regulations, only the fire ratings of walls between buildings and property lines. Our responsibility as an inspections department is to receive the designer's plans and information, review the plans for code c ompliance, and either approve those plans for permit issuance or reject the information until a resubmittal is made. I hope this information is helpful to the parties involved. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincere John S. Trenary, C Building OfficiaV enclosures cc: John R. Riley Jr., County Administrator ,.Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II Douglas A. Kiracofe, Fire Marshal File JST/gmp ;,. SRNT SY:612 672-8397 ; 1- 3-95 16:10 MASLON LAW FIRM- 17036780682;# 1/ 3 FAX TRANMa%"TA,L NMLOX BDl*;tamN BORMAN is miwD 3300 Norwest Center Minneapolis, lei 55402 (612) 672-8378 Telecopier: (612) 672-8397 TO: Mr. Evan Wyatt VAX NUMBER: 703-678-0682 TELEPHONE NUMBER: 703-665-5651 FROM: Jim O'Connor DATE: January 3, 1995 TOTAL NUMBER OF pA(;ES (InCludilnq cover sheet) : 3 CLIENT/MATTER NUMBER: M25300/93-2232 130MIATIR NOTIFICATION OF TRANSKITTAL (Y/N) : N CO TS: The information contained in this facsimile message is attorney privileged and confidential intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by telephone, and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. postal service. If you do not receive all of the pages, please call 672-8232, SENT SY:612 672-8397 ; 1- 3-93 ; 16:13 ; MASLON LAW FIRM- 17036780682;# 2/ 3 MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN* 3300 NORWESP CENTER 00 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOL IS, MINNESOTA 56462.4140 (612) 672.8200 FAX (812) 672-8997 & BRAND Writer's Direct Dial: 672-8378 a Profeaainnal Limited Liability Partnerehlp MAIMCHAXuj quArx January 3 1995 CHNua9s quANTANC3s, Jx � "a,LNUL KAil'17N G. WXLVVrW WnIJAM Z, F WzvLLN BY FACSEMgU IILLU� & DMELOVPIt:H JOaPH ALSXANDER GAEY J. HAUGEN TMOCA PALMER 1t LMR Mr. Lawrence R. Ambrogi a98BECC ANI[ BAUMANN RA4D) Y. HiRR County Attorney for UWREfi A JAMB h. C Q NNOR Frederick County JAM6t! b. O'COi7NOR L"W"R° T °f LiSOi1 I. arslNgERO RCI 5 North Kent Street LAWREK07 M. SHAPMO II a HOWAATAAKOW Winchester, VA 22601' Wn IJAM X MOWM PA LARRY A. XOOH VMGaN(A A. BELL JUNIN }i. Mn B. Ae 8ALLY BR]LHN IInC&StAN GRe: The Arbitration Between Miller Milling Co. TPRMARY '' a: AMLY and T.E. Ibberson Co. 0W=T,VIM Our File Fos.: 93-2232 and 93-2231 WAY" S. MCAxr1%-R2 MALLORY K aDwNR BUMN D. HOLAPPA aRAARL28 A. If0➢PUA,7 RVBBELL F. LSi7rRMAN, P,A, Dear Mr. Ambrogi RICHARD A. kE11R'F xARX W.LEB LORRIE L. aA=, BUSAN 19. 01APHANT ALAIN N.RAUDRY PATAKUA 1. ANNAL.K MNxo This letter confirms our telephone conversation of January 3, 1995, ANNA L. KORINKO JONAIMN & PAB11M BRIANJ.XM wherein we discussed my client's request for Mr, Evan Wyatt's attendance 1 IAMW 1P. kM1 INY UN at an arbitration hearing in Minneapolis sometime during the week of DAM January 13, 1995 1 will arrange for Mr. Wyatt to be subpoened to present iMVID T, q[m.99av DOUM"T.IfO j' live testimony at the arbitration hearing. Mr. Wyatt's testimony is relevant DOWLAB T. NOLOD CAWTON b. CKMVE WD JOHN D. 0ARI,ING to the general contractor's claim that it delivered the project late as a result NM P. AY0117 "MD A D. GB3lS9 of the owner's failure to timely secure an approved site plan from. Mr. - �`�� TT Wyatt's office. Mr. Wyatt's familiarity with site plan approval, in conjunction with his knowledge of the permitting process on this job, will OR COUNSEL be instrumental in resolving the dispute between the general contractor and W)BWRT NGE[.KE 1.r1pHAICL the owner. I appreciate your courtesy and the courtesy of all concerned in ARL L, SNOW" connection with working with Miller Milling Company to provide this very SAMUE+LRMIMI= important testimony, 100L1M IIY.W EDP.LMAN 'ow.I,Be Miller Milling Company recognizes the economic burden the County suffers by losing one of its valued employees for a da or two. Thus, Miller Milling Company hereby confirms that it will reimburse the County for Mr. Wyatt's time while he is away from his public duties. Obviously, Miller Milling Company will also arrange and pay for Mr, Wyatt's travel and accommodations. By copy of this letter to Mr, Wyatt, please be advised that my office will be in direct contact with you to arrange for your travel to Minnesota. SENT SY:612 672-8397 ; 1- 3-95 ; 16:13 ; MASLON LAW FIRM- 17036780682;# 3/ 3 January 3, 1995 Page 2 Thank you all for your time and hospitality. John and Herb Miller also extend their heart -felt thanks for your assistance, In the meantime, if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at your convenience, Very truly yours, �1-fI� James Duffy O'Connor JDO'C/des cc: Mr. Wayne Miller (via facsimile) Mr. Evan Wyatt (via facsimile) • LAMTZ CONSTRUCTION CO. OF WINCHESTER, INC. 600 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VA 22602 PHONE 703/665-0130 FAX 703/722-2678 July 14, 1993 Mr. John Trenary Frederick County Inspections Department 9 North Loudoun Street Winchester, VA 22602 Re: Miller Milling Fire Line Dear John: • jZ A 6 I9Q3 Ei'I F L-�! �! n�irpn T FREDERICK CO. Attached please find copies of the reports from the structural engineer and Grinnell regarding the fire line in question. Based on the comments and responses by those responsible we feel that there is minimal risk involved. The structural engineer feels that the load bearing capacity of the Ductile Iron pipe, it's crushed aggregate bedding and backfill, the subsequent regarding and testing at the time construction commenced, that the risk of abnormal deflection is not much different than that found on most building sites. we would like to resolve this question as quickly as possible so that the owner may make use of his building. Respectfully, ;George ANTZ CONSTRUCT CO. B. ughes Project Coordinator OF WINCHESTER, INC. cc: Dave Stark - T.E. Ibberson Harold Reynolds - T.E. Ibberson Kevin Ball - Miller Milling Norman Price - Grinnell Ron Real - Richmond Sprinkler stAm sTRucruRu. CONCEPTS, INC. July 7, 1993 Lantz Construction 600 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 Attn: Mr. Allen Ervin Re: Foundation over Sprinkler Line Miller Milling Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. Ervin STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, INVESTIGATIONS & BUILDING INSPECTIONS At your request a representative of our office visited the above reference project on June 23, 1993. The purpose of our visit was to observe the sprinkler line which is located below the exterior wall on the south side. We observed the sprinkler line at the south-west corner of the structure. The sprinkler line was approximately six feet below grade at this location. The bottom of the wall footing is 3' 6" + below grade. Based on our recent telephone conversation with you, it is our understanding that the sprinkler line is a minimum of 18" below the footing. We also understand that the sprinkler line was placed in a gravel bed and that the fill over the sprinkler line was placed in thin lifts and compacted. Triad Engineering's daily report number 1 dated 4/23/93 indicates that a minimum bearing capacity of 3000 psf was available for foundation bearing. Based on our understanding of the construction of the sprinkler line and Triad Engineering's inspection report, we are satisfied that the presence of the sprinkler line below the foundation at the south side will not adversly effect the structure, provided the sprinkler line does not leak and saturate the surrounding soil. Please contact our office with any questions you may have regarding this issue. Sincerely, J d,y Fox, P.E. r 's ' dent 2 Pigeon Hill Drive Suite 205 • Sterling, VA 22170 • (703) 406-8023 132 W Piccadilly St. • Winchester, VA 22601 • (703) 667-6174 • fax (703) 722-4748 C)Grfimffe05 FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS COMPANY 2110 Ruffin Road Richmond, VA 23234 July 1, 1993 Tel: (804) 233-M Lantz Construction Co. of Virginia Inc. 2903 Victory Lane Winchaster, VA 22601 Attn. Allen Ervin Re: Miller Milling Co. Winchester, VA Dear Allen: Concerning the underground piping for the above project, we can offer thy+ following comments. NFPA 24 8-3. The Pipe Line does have a Sectional Control Valve where it ties onto the Main Loop at the Pump House, which will isolate the piping passing under the building. There will also ba a Cont.rOl Valve on each of the System Risers which will control the piping as it exits the building on the System Side, It would ba impractical to install a PIV between the Warehouse and Mill Building, as this could present an unsafe condition in the event of an emergency. NFPA 13 2-8,2. The building does not sit directly on the pipe. We understand that there is approximately 18 inches between the bottom of the footing and the top of the pipe. Then installation of the piping utilized "Megalug" Joint Restraints, which are _ designed to allow for joint deflection, while still maintaining tight joints. A copy of the Megalug literature is attached. We did not know, at the time of installation, that the pipe would be under a building. We backfilled the entiro line with Crushed Shale, which is the typical backfill material for this area under roadways and pavement and provides excellent compaction without tamping. The backfill for this pipe line was not machine tamped. Unfortunately, we cannot guarantee that settling of the building will not break the pipe or cause a leak in the pipe. Any such guarantee cannot be made by anyone, due to all the conditions at play. We can, however, guarantee that the pipe and components were installed consistent with the manufacturer's recommendations and the listings of the components and the installation was thoroughly inspected and approved by the County 0111ciala. (Page 1 of 2) DIVISION OF (NUMNHl.S. CORPORATION I i i 0 (Page 2 at 2) 11 we can be of any further service, please contact us. RINNE RE PROTECTION SYSTEMS CO. Norman Price Contract Representative NPsjph Enclosure cc: " Dave Stark - T, E. Ibberson Harold Reynolds - T. E. Ibberson Kevin Ball - Miller Milling S. J. Christenbury - Grinnell Tom VonCannon - Grinnell (lantzl.ltr) • AlEGALUG t" 0 TIGHTENS ITS GRIP AS PRESSURE E FORCES INCREASE T?4 MEGAWO it a new aenefaftn of restrained joint that provides an Rtreeptbnal rellraint syster* rcr mechanical )pint tittlnps (AWWA CI 10 of C ) 53), valvds, fire hydrants. and pipe Its unique drstgn permits use on ductile iron pipe Clara 50 through Cta» 56. Frith no damage to the pipe wall of �trnent lining. The MEGALUG Is performance. T'he MEGALUG has a pressure 'attng of 350 psi In the 3' through IT shed end 250 psi in the 1S' through e8' sires At FBAA, every sire of every Joint r!sttamt design Ku been proof • oe %txd to at 4 a tt twice Ih rated pressure to PfvAde a stf. and reliable system. The 3' through 12' saes are 0nderwriter'3 Le+brxaton►z f-istrd and Factory Mutual System approved. The MECIALUG is klstalkd simply and easfty with common assetrb y toils. The twist -off nub make Setting ttse wedges •s ,.snap " R requires no beveling. gropving. wetding, or ether epeclal aatrfnbky technique- Ease of ass!mbiy. caup4d with use wfth the standatdi2c,1 rrt.chanical Mint, makes the MEGALOO completely %W *d*ptable. The MECAUX is resfllrr% In +addition to the abif}ty of the MEGALUG o deflect as much as N mechanical joint allows during assembly, R ofso deflects after laaunbbt. Sixes 12" and bekow are capable 01 up to 3* of deNctlon after burlal depending on the pftsent d*election. This ks posslbla because of 'The ES" Extrs," RCM (Resletv�d Contrvllt-d Mr,e-nent). A section of d' ductAe iron pipe way -8"Z`wed to 1W Casa 50 thicio"3s, the vnailest ale» arloMed to AWWA C151. MEaALUCS ware essamb#ad on aaeh and with end caps with no erterne) reirreani, T'h►ee tasu w - conducted to pressures of 200 paf, 330 psi. and 100 P,,i. ANT aactt teat the pipe end the ewnent Ifn(n9 *" exernened. n,,e 7ooves made by the ridges during theve ks" are I1A Wood In ern p0olir'nti Pgtire.) The groern made by Lhe MEGALUQ wrd4ex resemble roiled threads because they are told•Formed. The metal Is nee shear.d away. but tathvtf cold•.,orked by tAe wedge plowing dre ductile Ifon in Font of )1 and ral" a but"aa of coid•Workod Fan. Ern at twee the rased prttsure, N groove k of a depth that it Brightly mots Men haft of the 0,08' service arlo-of, t incorporated into the design of the ductile ken pipe in AWWA C150. The swvica afiomenc* is added !0 U+e cafeulalyd design d,icknaaL of tl» pipe and. the groove does not affect the design thieknesa df the ohx, rbr a more detelled erpianation of thh teat and ho.r. H» .MEGALUd works. tsk ter the article. ' Flaxibie Jomt Resu htt Syaaern Witfistanth Smarr Earthquakes, Se(l"." from die "Manul*chm"' Forum" of ttw Met"VAVO 19ff6 edil4" ed V*W*10rid News" (toil. 2. No. 2), life MFf•,4l flti FXTRA P tm v Caribbfkd hlx+sr+e►rt Mou )oktt rematm Sys*,, a Wait sick at pressures below the woridnq petts"it. When eddRfa�al external kster 4 apoiiad, " in can" of auDli libel , der, tial e loads, or even veal tremolo, the rrsuft M an urvrldletM4 incmese M stress at the )pints. ME(ALUO's unbar detilgn doetnt need to tarkt up skark in order to rerfat the foK of av&%ery uer. \m the whouneimeciad u hatwensWs?0 responds sAth what"cad RRt""w CentroAitid e ru The ation oho" ew MEG&CIO rcwNwh w4h RCM oily as the eueerrtal fore* 1• fnereuad nwftig perforrrantt frt such cadltlorn predktable. The PO 09Ns kWh Moira an irnlyd 12 f!N aer issea vplild during ROk 11 ft � d RCM illrr*Nrad, the )*4 tonik+t*$ 10 te*rt h tin MY* nwtnar as any as dh Pit ra"ota b t o Mfvapifaai i<al+lt>'Ca >N � MA+1e1�11 rysd.tt, Tom hwe af+vam trA ten !t" rrt OaRa rM load Is basrrned — *rid do R04 It avrabk 69*1. ME111ALM's RCM is a ttleOt:R absorbaq *c*V to dasstQlet and Iloiala staddsn bads, TW mr&* kngd+ ► 60 It Araa.bk rttsent mornxM at WIN" T 0AW MM KI- 41111q W mkt -- Tow Ttteortdtd al nuldda &pr,rtf+a dsrf�� oilers • 1 7k Poe** re*! 1 t7U Il �t o 111 am* � rr e sm ttl ZT. b0'd HJd d3 113NNIdD ,MEGALUG SPECIFICATiONS & DATA • 4^Mrt.F arrr•urr vrriN Mechanieaf 4oint mwoont that! bt IncopWatttd in the detfgn of the foitvwer OWs d end ehen IncUo a rt rralr+ing mechsnhrn w,hkh, when s<swsed *flwU mwWls wgdg" action egainit the ph-)*. Increas" ks mostenct as the prrssvre wKtosses. rl"Iwty of U19 joint shall bt m■Irttsined at4. bvOwL Glands 0141 he rn"ufaetvrad of dugs Iron co, F" ,I, g io ASTM A 536-A0, Restraining devtees shsA bo of duct n hon hest traatad to a r+tlntmvm hardnesA of 370 Br - Dimensions of Vw 0" sW be such that R can be vxd ++tl, the ster+dardtced moKmemical joint ben and bm-heed bolls con(mmo,g to ANWAWWA A21.1 1 end AftSi1AWWA C153/A21.53 of latht revision. Tmot-oM nuts than be used to )+sure proper achwdng 0l the remaining devices. The me+:hankttf )omt rettrsint dr re shen have a worirjny pressure of at tenet 230 psi *Ah a minimum tet" 'aror of 2. f end than be QISAA fro". Me.. MECAUX or met. BRIEF SPECIFICATIONq ro �f1 1 1()() St RIFS MCMIr(Al, 3IRIF_1 A"QCX. RATEO PION Nl1Mse" S11ror'INC PR13 R size u7 rIBS.) 211 3 1103 :!0 150 4 1104 : Cb )50 6 110d 12 Ov) 350 e 1to$ 1% u) 350 10 1110 :1as 350 12 I112 �I m 350 ! 1 1 1 11 350 10 11161 15 00 )50 1e 1;•e „M �50 20 IN 2+ 1�.4 .1R 25 150 30 1130 i9+Co 150 30 1135 d`3CIO 2SO at 11d1 ;QJ CC 250 bs 11,9 +"i CO 230 For Teal pre»ut" &bole the rated pr"Sure! sho%m. eorvuft fret csgw*tring department of ERM hon. In.. rm reeommendedoni EBM-Saf gaskets are provided with the 3T (7Knugh 41r MlGAWCS. Abo OvAded sate the 42' end 48' site, re omu length T•boltz The 4asi" end bdito ate provided b5 *1111 *e estkr atserrbfy of the mtvhwnicsl jo 1 and are required On ;,S* abv%m rderenced sit" to obtmM N pttsSum ratlngs and ufety fac+vs Shown. For profeela ustny I*qe diarnete+ resralr,ss, pfesta contact this oMke for our design reeemrnt*+det3orst. AEAPI VIEW FAaw MEIN M 0 1 4 SECTICN A•A 1 0.12 sECT�or, ae ® S}+=DER OM7 0 WtM Ja1 1 M Ito] 1t0a r84 k92 27 .17 404 4% $19 7.!0 Oa7' 0.75 l: •.1 l 2 t i470 f.fQ 1105 1106 402 loll 227 2J1 7('0 015 IN 11.75 Oea IAO t1 '.1 3 t 6 6 , it30 . Ike tt00 1411 t 110 1112 i I413112 1 7 2�7 1129 u3o 1400 16�5 1.00 100 to t+ 6 / 1 1 16l0 ' tip 1124 1114 ►ill 16,40 1150 261 2.69 15u 1754 1975 100 I N IN IA% '1 t0 12 10 I � M.64 at72 21°.ilt0lt III$ 1120 21360 21 N 2f9 2 69 106t 2174 b1! 25x 1.43, 10 ; '� '1 , 12 1e f 14 970 X40 00 27.10 1121 1130 100 D29 l72 3J1 2s.0 .217 XOO )ON 1511 ZZ % I'A • 16 20 1 16 20 3294 79,11 e4 !7 1136 I tQ 7959 45.79 331 154 3447 4407 A171, X62 , 2z I" IA iM 24 2+ ltl II 49.47 1167 7 7 JT I tb slot 4 /36 i mp., ITC : 1_M 1% ,VA . - Ir atl?Al31 AMID 41it � m CUP V11- Off IR71� ise'1irM Atlb Ap9Rt7tNLs fCaR SOM t 100124ALtq steep r t r 6ss t6slad u,rilfrta+#Ms i+le. abpoty FIIf{V RatMN► tttlla6 i tll�I!l016 d 1� �a+i The 9stlr+g ha r>~snbar K� SMN �'rllgl�l � a "'i noti<y hltalud sppvea4 a. Thor MF-G&L < is approved Ay ove1 200 Q"& wvAu, &nd "W"nog at" UVOU ► AA tt» UV&d Staut h has met wan Q+�� succtm toy�4 byuucal end asaernoly probitrm in tM UM and pr=: a sale, f*Mbk rys+,ar71 t9 corr4pk%ty rap♦m Sttrusl bloc" end us rods in w(mat 4ataUvxx a 7a" terse an standard on every S+rle& 11 OQ MEGALt7a dwnbry Io MONNIt MOOst Untslnton every thrn. No sp" took we requked The Merle so" "d ttr vo m to T-oob on " 4' though 2V uses can tw used to f lhht l t It M-gd rota in ail sisal. Ykuat hg*o ort at jokes con M btu tw*kuon ai)o b&. when "rust b sheared QM a OTHER MECutiUG PRODUCTS AVAIL BLZ FROM EBAA I n, i i uuso Su,c, Au rtt Ptertetr 4779=- 4896WJ The 110= Series rNt *K is a WA rat WA ayaaam Eor the OWtWkai pm This *W reatrahm &lbws For Vw repek of &4&tinq valves AKMVL "w+o and wo joints wi+ae k I& ad� to row" er~isttrs, "did brow >Iprstst w The Wu&& ation is Wnpk " a is ov*A" h the r Waqh Ora' &4as wM prtsaurt tuiri& Gorr► 350 poi to im pK rr,c I Mliu 8s4110 Auww Mteribr4779WC} 4496909 The 1100 hD Said mwaku is a mu&kA syWom kw rauaaMnq ptsh-an pipe belt&. The rewalnt is of A tpils de6o so that than is ro job darupuon edm & is being lnstabW and mtatWq bobs can be mmak+sd wNwA eupinp and so"ovo the W k>r -Mdw 1& Wrfk, and Uw t 100M Was Is weed" n die IV through 4er sha.. I IM kbSAA•Saat C�aJut TM EMMSad 9W* is an imptpwd tuba Im uae with the mwWwdeW owchw%icet joint TV" Gasket was 4*o4 od to con*im t w ease of asaarJ* of uo m dw*od joint ,46 dw soon capeb Ame d um push on joint Medmricd joint ndass on 1t t>M++p4Ae4 by oecramov " W" r An �ENAN-Seel Ga>�Canaa and used wish Ow i 100SD toeapak obkrm M &a1 3c* g"W r pf Mdod 'Inch each 30- WouGh 4V A%" and M Nvan&be h ad Gar 9 0 ' d 1 SSOE, Inc. Engineers Architects 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Phone: (419) 255-3830 Fax: (41 TO: County of Frederick Department of Planning & Development 9 N. Loudoun Street, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Letter of Transmittal Date: 6-25-92 Transmittal No.: 20 Job No.: 921031 ATTN: Mr. Evan 'lyatt RE: Project Harvest Phase II Site Plan Application We are sending you the following via: Regular Mail Overnight Mail ❑X Under Separate Cover ElHand Delivered Pickup Item fxy. Code Rev. Dwg./Spec. No. Title/Description 1 D-5 ISite Plan Check List 2 D-5 !Site Plan Application 3 D-5 lComment Sheets 4 H-5 Cover Sheet !Site Plan Package 5 H-5 5 C31 iOverall Site Plan 6 H-5 8 C34 !Partial Utility Plan & Geometrics 7 H-5 1 C52 Partial Railroad Plan & Profile Sta 16+00 to 25+00 8 H-5 0 C60 Flour Mill -Utility Plan & Geometrics 9 H-5 0 C61 IFlour Mill -Paving & Grading Plan 10 H-5 0 C62 IFlour Mill -Jointing Plan & Notes 11 H-5 0 C72 'Sanitary Sewer Profile CODES: A - Print B - Sepia Reproduction C - Mylar Reproduction D - Copy E - Specification F - Shop Drawing Sub. No. G - _ Diskette H- 6 Prints/1 Sepia REMARKS: 1 - For Construction 2 - For Purchasing 3 - For Bids, due 4 - Reference Only 5- For Approval 6- For Review & Comment 7 - As Requested 8- For Your Use cc: E. Buchan - HFC (w/1 copy) H. Miller - Miller (w/1 copy) B. DeFiore - HBA (w/1 copy) D. McCormick - Ibberson (w/1 copy) R. Scott - SSOE (w/1 copy) file Signed: 9- A/E Review - No Exceptions 1 o - A/E Review - As Noted 11 - A/E Review - Rejected 12 - Resubmit Copies 13 - Preliminary 14 - Addendum No. 15 - Bulletin No. 16- Jay TJ,/LingnelI, R.A. Project Manager Page 1 of 2 Letter of Transmittal Date: 6-25-92 Job No.: 921031 Transmittal No.: 20 921031 Page 2 of 2 Item Qty. Code Rev. Dwg./Spec. No. Title/Description 12 H-5 2 LD1 Site Landscape Plan 13 H-5 1 LD2 Enlarged Landscape Plan & Plant List EXCEL\FORMS\TRANSMIT.XLW SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The site plan application is not complete if the required information is not submitted. All required information must be obtained prior to the submission of this application. If any part of the required information is missing or not complete, the site plan application will not be accepted by the planning department. The applicant shall meet with the staff member in charge of site plan review when the application is ready for submission to insure that all required information is complete. SITE PLAN PACKAGE 1. One set of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan: VDOT !� Co. San. Auth. X Inspections Dept. n Fire Marshal Town of Middletown ACounty Engineer City of Winchester Co. Health Dept. Parks & Rec. Airport Authority Town of Stephens City Soil & Water Conser. Dist. 2. One copy of the Site Plan application 1 3. Zour copies of the Site Plan 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required) 5. A 35mm slide of the Site Plan (if required) =Z 7 0 SITE PLAN APPLICATION Complete the following application: DATE June 19, 1992 APPLICATION # 1. Development 2. Location of Property: (by street name) Ft. Collier Industrial Park 542 Park Center Drive Winchester. Virginia 3. Property Owner: Hershey Pasta Group 16 Address: 100 Crystal A Drive Hershey, PA 17033-0810 Telephone: (717) 534-5711 4. Applicant/Agent: Miller Milling Co. Address: 777 Grain Exchange Building Minneapolis, MN 55415 Telephone: (612) 332-6331' 5. Designer: SSOE, Inc. Address: 1001 Madison Avenue ' Toledo, Ohio 43624 Telephone: (419) 255-3830 Contact: Jay Lingnell/Rick Scott 6. Is this an original or revised Site Plan? Original Revised X -5- 0 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: 8. Property Information: 82.136 Acres Phase II Portion a) Property ID #: (Not Established_ Parent Track 54-A-36A b) Current Zoning: M-1 c) Present Use: Agricultural/Pasture d) Proposed Use: Wheat Milling Facility e) Adjoining Property Zoning: M-1, MH-1, RA f) Adjoining Property Use: Agricultural/Pasture/Vacant g) Magisterial District: Stonewall District I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submissioi of my site plaril-, Signature: Date: 6-19- 92 • /fit 1.2.k r J c j tf &,;, SPA April 17, 1992 T.E. Ibberson Company Attn: Mr. David McCormick 3424 Wooddale Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55416 RE: Miller Milling Project. Dear Mr. McCormick: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703; 678-0682 The purpose of this letter is to respond to your correspondence and drawing, received by this office on April 13, 1992. In particular, you have asked Frederick County to respond to questions regarding height requirements for mechanical equipment that will be placed on top of the automated storage facility. Section 3-1-2.1.2 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance specifies that mechanical equipment may exceed the height limitations if it is screened from public view of surrounding properties and right-of-ways. Your drawing indicates that the equipment will be enclosed by a twenty (20) foot wall on four (4) sides with a roof to protect the equipment from atmospheric exposure. You have also stated in your letter that this will make this structure "cosmetically acceptable to Hershey, Frederick County, and the City of Winchester." This type of construction conforms with the intent of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance; therefore, a variance will not be required if the building is constructed in this manner. I have enclosed a memorandum from the Frederick County Fire Marshal. Although this type of construction conforms with the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, it is considered by the Fire Marshal as an additional twenty (20) foot story. It is very important that this structure meet all applicable fire codes and design standards. You may contact Mr. Douglas Kiracofe, Fire Marshal (703/665/6350) if you have questions. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 r Page -2- McCormick Ltr. April 17, 1992 Hopefully this letter has addressed your concerns. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter, or if I may be of any assistance. Sincerely, &j Evan A. Wya t Planner II EAW/slk enclosure cc: Herbert G. Miller, Miller Milling Company John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Douglas A. Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshal John S. Trenary, Frederick County Building Official Co, • • rp4' COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA + FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT 9 N. Loudoun Street, 2nd Floor " Winchester, Virginia 22601 me Thomas W. Owens Douglas A. Kiracofe Director Fire Marshal MEMORANDU M TO: Evan Wyatt, Planner II 6 FROM: Douglas A. Kiracofe, Fire Marshal Fire & Rescue Department SUBJECT: Hershey Foods Project DATE: April 16, 1992 I have reviewed the sketches submitted by T. E. Ibberson Co. regarding height variances. If the exterior walls are raised the 20' and a roof placed over it, than we actually have an additional 20' story on the building. This would have to meet the various aspects of the building code governing sprinkler systems, egress, exits, etc. Just running parapet walls up 20' above the roof line will make access to the roof impossible via ladder truck. I'm sure there will be access to the roof from within the building for normal working routines so fire department personnel could utilize these scuttles. In designing the access points to the roof, I will request the architect to place a minimum of two access points to the roof as remote from each other as possible. Also, the door openings at these access points will be requested to be large enough for emergency operations that may be necessary on the roof of the Mill. I'm thinking of an opening on the order of 36" x 48" with a platform for staging equipment about six feet below the opening itself. I hope this clears up the thinking on whether to put a roof over the area or not. Should you have any questions please advise. DAK:jla cc: John Trenary - Building Official File DIRECTOR - (703) 665-5618 FIRE MARSHAL - (703) 665-6350 FAX - (703) 678-0682 0 -Pfc-�- --- FIX I SM2 GJ4 : sv xt- 007--tiZ COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 0714920568 Applicant Name Date Received 071492 Date Reviewed 4wll- 9l SSOE, Inc. Address 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo. OH 43624 Project Name Phase 2, Hershey Pasta, Miller Milling Phone No. 419-2SS-3830 Type of Application �rr /�cav f�N.�x Current Zoning /!l 1st Due Fire Co. /.3 1st Due Rescue Co. /.j Election District sro�Fc%�i� RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes I_ No Comments:fiC/y�ac�- Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate x_ Inadequate Not Identified _ Special Hazards Noted; Yes _ , No Comments: 1-47xei--:5 - Continued - 0 • Hydrant Locations; Adequate X Inadequate Siamese Connection Location; Approved Y Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified Additional Comments:U2Zji�/G *T'z c'c uNnoC Nojuaa9ljd `1VHS8VW gEly a3AO8ddV SNVId Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal PLANS APPROVED FIRE MARSHAL, FREDEP;ICK COUNTY • Control No. COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS 0714920S68 Date Received 071492 Date Reviewedc 9� Applicant Name SSOE, Inc. Address 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo. OH 43624 Project Name Phase 2, Hershey Pasta, Miller Milling Phone No. 419-255-3830 Type of Application Current Zoning �l 1st Due Fire Co. /3 1st Due Rescue Co. /.I Election District ST c/FGa/�GL RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Emergency Vehicle Access; Residential Sprinkler System Other Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes No Comments: Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate x Inadequate Not Identified _ Special Hazards Noted; Yes _k' No C o m m e n t s: - Continued - Hvdrant Locations; Adequate _ Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Connection Location; Approved k Not Approved Not Identified Additional Comments: S��Ci.�L�IE7J � — �G�yyi clG �'440 R e . - AlNROC N0183o3dd 'IVHSHVW 3H1:4 CJBAOUddb' SNVId Douglas A.Kiracofe Fire Marshal PLANS APPROVED __.FIRE MARSHAL, FREDERICK COUNTY (• z7vlo1�v W )14 TT *REW- C/V7y PI-44W 111* L.' COUNTY of FREDERICK SF"� 199? The F t Department of Planning and Development 703 665-565fi FAX 703 66'-0370 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Sanitation Authority p.0. Boa 618, Wi-nchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 rick County Sanitation Authority is located on the oor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in r, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, add ess and phone number: Name of development and/or description of the request: A Itle 4 i,4A I*06' f�ci� pry Location: JrT, ry L G iR Sanitation Authority Comments: eve RJFW - ARovAWV! P44 s T/IC 45 "1/ oA C- iro 06 co 701 0 Sanit. Signature 6 Date�4# �-4 SoP (NOTICE TO SANITATION - RETURN THIS FORK: TO PLICAN'i.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application form. 'cc 001,r �1jej" I-- M /�e E't .�►�« ��vj' moo, r-r n Pr„ A01 VA'inche�,ter, Vir¢inia 22601 is REPORT OF TELECON 0`L *- SPA- 007--97_ SSOE, Inc. Engineers Architects 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Phone (419) 255-3830 Fax (419) 255-6101 CALLTO: �A'N W (ATT PHONE NO.: ? D 3 - (e 6 ;' - 57G C'l DATE: JOB NO.: CALL FROM: tSJA"Y I.IN (44 EA, SUBJECT: sso F- PHONE NO.: Telecon Report No. Pape l of PP-6i &t-�- N4kv 6 s 7 Re C-r w (N C i-f-EsTe-P' vg , MESSAGE: 6VlO ( IJ 0 CC A-T&-0 Ff."'-t� ev). -L4 H�kt Ao'p Fzd`f�s�0 P4A S c -7� 0 F s (-CF- PLel-N FV l2 PP-tPj &cT HA -►av E5 s T 4f c.0 o U L 0 Lt �-G^ 70 R7A1% e Z C. c All E: D pq� G S (2- T (t1 - R- 12-&c-4 (R-O S , w'Q U L✓V) 5 ET s n P P-t t-7 S I S &—F O F ri 9-0 0 U C4 0 l..s _w & ems, 0 W k t L M G N 0 S 1 Ze Y\A Yt-A--fZ of-- c -(:n 0 A-0 0 c- � Z TO 4-0 rtO W til TAP-& i,,T GGti OC-- c.� c a nil' Y s N ,7 �4-T, 0 n� DISTRIBUTION: (�i ewco rw - N FC & 6 Pe-fl 0 916 File: JADOC\EXCEL\FORMS\TELE-TOLXLS VIA lL l.G'' Z -U W E OCT - I ��I, I 8� SSOE, Inc. Engineers Architects 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Phone: (419) 255-3830 Fax: (419) 255-6101 TO: County of Frederick Dept. of Planning & Develop;nent 9 Court Square Winchester, VA 22601 Letter of Transmittal Date: 10-1-92 Transmittal No.: S-100192- Job No.: 911173-50 572 ATTN: ?1r. Evan Wyatt RE: Project Harvest Phase II We are sending you the following via: Regular Mail F-7 1 Overnight Mail Under Separate Cover Hand Delivered Pickup Item Oty. Code Rev. Dwg./Spec. No. Title/Description 1 3 A-7 Desi n Packa e No. 1- Site Work 2 1 B-7 Design Package No. 1- Site Work I i CODES: A - Print B - Sepia Reproduction C - Mylar Reproduction D - Copy E - Specification F - Shop Drawing Sub. No. G - Diskette H - 1 - For Construction 2 - For Purchasing 3 - For Bids, due 4 - Reference Only 5 - For Approval 6 - For Review & Comment 7 - As Requested 8 - For Your Use 9 - A/E Review - No Exceptions 10 - A/E Review - As Noted 11 - A/E Review - Rejected 12 - Resubmit Copies 13 - Preliminary 14 - Addendum No. 15 - Bulletin No. 16- REMARKS: The enclosed prints/sepias are the approved Site Work drawings you requested for your records. cc: E. Buchan - HFC B. DeFiore - HBA file Signed: lay T. Linggell, R.A. Project 1`1anager Page I of 1 • I � CoZ' °IZ D� SP �LV' l)o 2 - 9 7— COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VI&IA DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS Caller H. R. ALL_-_ P(#JDER Time Called Date Called i " 7-1 Phone No. to78 - 1 5 05 Time Requested Pnl Date Requested Received By At,3 WYATr— Date of Inspection -27-S 71 PERMIT HOLDER NAME C'1E�ZSHE`� FooDS RT. NO. Lot No. No. SUBDIVISION rpKT COL-u O 1tUD . �A,�1t STREET NAME AIZ%G Cis -�S_EC. DIRECTIONS 1 K _TURtJ r, 0WI-0 i'a,,5 BUILDING NO. 0913-9 C�.SiLr2 ��z �l� hfllACLzy-sr T'C) 8L..0 Dr`1yE _10 PLUMBING NO. IHU-_-A-nZ ►TL A-r- EiJi7 aF CUL-- DE -SA-c- .. ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. SIGN NO. DISTRICT �lDNCuJ►4L� PERMIT FOR: �1ERSHE�/ t"AS t Pi_&0-T` Type of Inspection Residential Commercial Footers Setbacks: FR BK L R Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Water Service Framing Final Mechanical Sewer Rough Electric Final Site Plan ., Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Fire Marshall Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Special/Complaint — Other: 3�S-7a+• Time In: I Temperature ° � F Cut in No. Time Out: 4 33 Pn1 Weather SU�J►J'� Results: Approved Comments: Rejected C , a - Signature Date 1 %Z�I93 I��IlG(.uv� ���- Aj-�3 ; HK, Rite-� � ZZ(0 1 �. �--D � � -b "& � r � r i COUNTY of FREDERICK i Department of Planning and Development 703; 665-5651 FAX 703/1678-0682 TELECOPIER/FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE DATE: .tanuary 27. 1992 TRANSMITTALTIME: NAME: COMPANY: CITY, STATE: TELECOPIER # RE: PLEASE DELIVER THIS PAGE(S) IMMEDIATELY TO: Mr. Jay Lingnell SSOE Inc. Toledo, Ohio 419/255/6101 Hershey Food Corporation Site Plan TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER LETTER: -4- MESSAGE: The original copy is being mailed to your attention today. Please contact me if I may be of any assistance. FROM: Evan A. Wyatt PHONE: 703/665/5651 TELECOPIER /FAX NUMBER: (703) 678-0682 THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 W, I Hydrant Locations; Adequate X Inadequate Siamese Connection Location; Approved X Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified Additional Comments: 1) Several hydrants are shown 20' from curb. Chapter 10 of the Frederick County Code requires hydrants within 3' of curb.• 2) Hydrants in parking areas must be placed away from parking spaces. 3) Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times during construction. 4) Burning of construction debris is not permitted. 5) All valves, PIV's and pipe installation shall meet requirements of F.C.S.A. Review Time 1.5-hr. Y Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal 0 n U 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: 82.136 Acres 8. Property Information: a) Property ID #:(Not Establishs-d)) Parent Tract 54-A-36A b) current Zoning: M-1 c) Present Use: Agricultural / Pasture d) Proposed Use: Pasta Production Facility e) Adjoining Property Zoning: M-1, MH-1, RA f) Adjoining Property Use: Agricultural/Pasture/Vacant g) Magisterial District: Stonewall District I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete pricr to the submission of my site plan. Signature: Date: I } ` FEB I g iyyL Li Hydrant Locations; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Connection Location; Approved X Not Approved Not Identified Additional Comments: 1) Several hydrants are shown 20' from curb. Chapter 10 of the Frederick County Code requires hydrants within 3' of curb. 2) Hydrants in parking areas must be placed away from parking spaces. 3) Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times during construction. 4) Burning of construction debris is not permitted. 5) All valves, PIV's and pipe installation shall meet requirements of F.C.S.A. Review Time 1.5-hr. -(9 ; 2��- � � � Douglas A. kiracofe Fire Marshal • u PROJECT HARVEST DRAWING LIST C-31 OVERALL SITE PLAN C-33 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-34 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-35 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-36 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-37 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-38 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-39 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-40 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-41 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-42 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-43 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-44 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-45 SITE DETAILS C-46 SITE DETAILS C-47 CONCRETE JOINING & PAVEMENT STRIPING PLAN C-48 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE C-50 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-51 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-52 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-53 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-54 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-55 RAILROAD DETAILS C-ES-1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-ES-2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-ES-3 IEROSION CONTROL DETAILS (3a SSOE, Inc. Engineers Architects 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43614 Phone: (419) 255-3830 Fax: (419) 255-6101 TO: Frederick County Planning Dept. 9 N. Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 •Letter of Tra nsmittal Date: 11- 21- 91 Transmittal No.: S 112191- 21: Job No.: 911173-02 ATTN:_mr. Evan A. Wyatt RE: Project Harvest We are sending you the following via: Regular Mail Overnight Mail ® Under Separate Cover Hand Delivered Pickup n Title/Description -Drawing CODES: A - Print B - Sepia Reproduction C - Mylar Reproduction D - Copy E - Specification F - Shop Drawing Sub. No. G - Diskette H- REMARKS: cc: J. Lingnell - SSOE file 1 - For Construction 2 - For Purchasing 3 - For Bids, due 4 - Reference Only 5 - For Approval 6 - For Review & Comment 7 - As Requested 8 - For Your Use Signed: 9 - A/E Review - No Exceptions 10 - A/E Review - As Noted 11 - A/E Review - Rejected 12 - Resubmit Copies 13 - Preliminary 14 - Addendum No. 15 - Bulletin No. 16- Dennis Lechlak, P.E. Page _1 of 2 EXCELTORMSITRANSMIT.XLW PROJECT HARVEST - SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following comments pertain to the applicants checklist or comments returned by county authorities. 1. Meets and bounds of easements will be furnished by Greenway. (#17) 2. The location and type of all dwelling units is not applicable. (#23) 3. Sign design requirements have not been determined. The location is shown on the Electrical Site Plan. (#23) 4. The location and area of common open space is not applicable. (#26) 5. The location and description of all recreation facilities is not applicable. (#27) 6. Cross sections or profiles of required buffers and screening are not provided. Buffers are shown on landscape plan. (#44) 7. Bridge hydrologic/hydraulic calculations for box culverts under Park Center Drive and Railroad have been sent to Ed Strawsnyder under separate transmittal. 8. Comments from John Whitacre on sanitary line below railroad do not apply. A sleeve for line below railroad was not provided, therefore, cathodic protection is not required. 9. The sanitary meter design is to be prepared by Perry Engineering, reviewed and approved by John Whitacre and submitted to SSOE as as a shop drawing submittal. 10. The city water line is to be extended from the pump house toward the east property line then south along the existing easement and tied into the existing 12" city water line at Brooke Road. This change to the site plan will be submitted in approximately one week. John Whitacre has reviewed a preliminary layout of this water line extension and verbally approved the layout with Dennis Lechlak. Page 1 i FEB 18 09Z PROJECT HARVEST - SITE PLAN APPLICATION The following comments pertain to the applicants checklist or comments returned by county authorities. 1. Meets and bounds of easements will be furnished by Greenway. (#17) 2. The location and type of all dwelling units is not applicable. (#23) 3. Sign design requirements have not been determined. The location is shown on the Electrical Site Plan. (#23) 4. The location and area of common open space is not applicable. (#26) 5. The location and description of all recreation facilities is not applicable. (#27) 6. Cross sections or profiles of required buffers and screening are not provided. Buffers are shown on landscape plan. (#44) 7. Bridge hydrologic/hydraulic calculations for box culverts under Park Center Drive and Railroad have been sent to Ed Strawsnyder under separate transmittal. 8. Comments from John Whitacre on sanitary line below railroad do not apply. A sleeve for line below railroad was not provided, therefore, cathodic protection is not required. 9. The sanitary meter design is to be prepared by Perry Engineering, reviewed and approved by John Whitacre and submitted to SSOE as as a shop drawing submittal. 10. The city water line is to be extended from the pump house toward the east property line then south along the existing easement and tied into the existing 12" city water line at Brooke Road. This change to the site plan will be submitted in approximately one week. John Whitacre has reviewed a preliminary layout of this water line extension and verbally approved the layout with Dennis Lechlak. Page 1 i la, 1993 - -tx.v L4-A-la- � 351 Z4-8 (KFPA) u LL)O-t-Q- L&�� / jt�- Lka TWO LAFAYETTE CENTRE SUITE 450 1133 21ST STREET, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20036.3302 202.887-5200 SUITE 505 451 HUNGERFORD DRIVE ROCKVILLE. MARYLAND 20850 (301) 217-0869 SENDER'S DIRECT DIAL: VIA HAND DELIVERY Lawrence R. Ambrogi, County Attorney for County 5 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia WICKWIRE GAVIN, P. C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY SUITE 700 8100 BOONE BOULEVARD VIENNA, VIRGINIA 22182-2642 703-790-8750 CABLE ADDRESS WIREGG WASHINGTON, D.C. TELECOPIER 703-448-1801 TELECOPIER 703-448-1767 January 12, 1995 Esq. Frederick 22601 NATIONAL GUARDIAN LIFE BUILDING SUITE 300 2 EAST GILMAN STREET MADISON, WISCONSIN 53703-1683 608.257.5335 WICKWIRE GAVIN A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS 444 S. FLOWER STREET LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-2912 21 3-688-9500 Re: T.E. Ibberson Company v. Hershey Foods Corporation, et al., In Chancery No. C94-144 (Circuit Court for Frederick County, Virginia) Dear Mr. Ambrogi: Pursuant to your agreement with Mr. James D. O'Conner, of Maslon, Edelman, Borman & Brand, enclosed please find an original Subpoena issued by the Arbitrators presiding over the matter of T.E. Ibberson Company and Miller Milling Company, Case No. 56 110 00056 94, in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Also enclosed is a copy of a Notice of Deposition and Request for Deposition subpoena, the originals of which will be served upon you by the Sheriff later this week. As you know, the purpose of these subpoenas is to obtain testimony from Mr. Wyatt for use in the arbitration hearings. I understand that at this point, Mr. Wyatt will attend the hearings in Minneapolis on the 19th of January, or a later date if those proceedings get bogged down. Should circumstances change, however, the Notice of Deposition is to insure that we have some other means to obtain testimony from Mr. Wyatt, albeit in Virginia. WICKWIRE GAVIN, P. C. Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Esq. January 12, 1995 Page 2 Please contact me immediately if you have any questions. Very truly yours, WICKWIRE GA Japes C. Th iII Enclosures i \1 `i cc: John D. Darling (via tele ier) Daniel E. Toomey, Esq. c:lt\wp51\doc\130333.003\ambrogi.001 M j N V I R G I N I A IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY (Civil Division) I: T.E. IBBERSON COMPANY, ) i Complainant, ) i.V. ) In Chancery No. C94-144 HERSHEY FOODS CORPORATION ) it and ) j ) !MILLER MILLING COMPANY, LTD. ) 'PARTNERSHIP ) Respondents. ) I• I; REQUEST FOR DEPOSITION SUBPOENA THE CLERK OF THE COURT will please issue a subpoena, I! ipursuant :to,Rule 4:5 of the Rules of the Virginia Supreme Court requiring Mr. Evan Wyatt to testify in accordance with the attached Notice of Deposition. follows: The subpoena should be issued as i! Mr. Evan Wyatt c/o Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Esq. County Attorney 5 N. Kent Street I Winchester, VA 22601 I I� DATED this 0" day of January 1995. i WICKWIRE G"iN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW li Respectfully submitted, SUITE 700 Bi00 BOONE BOULEVARD �! MILLER MILLING COMPANY, LTD. VIENNA, VIRGINIA PARTNERSHIP 22I62.2642 !' By Counsel l v WICKWIRE GAVIN, P.C. .8100 Boone Boulevard ,.Suite 700 Vienna, Virginia 2182 (703) 79 -8750 By: �aL D niel E. ToonC y V Bar No. 3 939/ ames C . Thompsom, Jr. f a. Bar No. 27863 Cou el for Miller Milling Company, Ltd. Partnership CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Request 1 for Deposition Subpoena was mailed, first-class, postage prepaid, this Eh day of January 1995 to the following: Michael A. Branca, Esq. Thompson & Waldron 1055 North Fairfax Street 1; Fourth Floor Alexandria, VA 22314 Counsel for T.E. Ibberson Company c:lt\wp51\doc\13033.003\reqdep.sub WicKwIRE GAVIN, P.C. ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 700 8100 BOONE BOULEVARD VIENNA. VIRGINIA 22182.2642 2 The Arbitration Tribunals of the American Arbitration Association In the Matter of the Arbitration between T. E. IBBERSON COMPANY and MILLER MILLING COMPANY Subpoena CASE NUMBER: 56 110 00056 94 FROM THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA to EVAN WYATT Employed of Frederick County GREETING: WE COMMAND YOU that, all business and excuses being laid aside, you and each of you appear and attend before B. C. Hart, Timothy M. O'Brien and Jonathan H. Morgan arbitrators(s) acting under the arbitration law of this state, at American Arbitration Association, 514 Nicollet Mall, Sixth Floor, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 (address) on the 19th day of January , 1995 , at 10 : 00 o'clock, to testify and give evidence in a certain arbitration, then and there to be held between the above entitled parties. Signed: _2na_%1a/ �• V ;j /�.,< " Signed: { rbitrator(s) Request by: Miller Milling Company John D. Darling Name of Representative -1,100 Norwest Venter, M;nnPapplis, MT 55402 Address ZIP Code _(612) 672-8353 Telephone Dated: January 4, 1995 Form G9-11/89 , `` V I R G I N I A IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY (Civil Division) T.E. IBBERSON COMPANY, Complainant, V. HERSHEY FOODS CORPORATION and ;MILLER MILLING COMPANY, LTD. i;PARTNERSHIP Respondents. In Chancery No. C94-144 ! NOTICE OF DEPOSITION IITO: Mr. Evan Wyatt c/o Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Esq. County Attorney 5 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 PLEASE TARE NOTICE that at 10:00 a.m. on the 19th day of ;January, 1995, Defendant Miller Milling Company Ltd. Partnership !' will take the deposition upon oral examination of Mr. Evan Wyatt, i. Iat the offices of Wickwire Gavin, P.C., 8100 Boone Boulevard, Suite 700, Vienna, Virginia 22182, or some other location agreed I Into by the witness. The deposition will be used for all proper rICHWIRE GAVIN, P.C. I Purposes allowed by law and the Rules of the Virginia Supreme ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 700 I� Court. 00 BOONE BOULEVARD Ij VIENNA, VIRGINIA i; DATED this th day of January 1995. I! 22182.2642 li I Respectfully submitted, MILLER MILLING COMPANY, LTD. PARTNERSHIP By Counsel WICKWIRE GAVIN, P.C. 8100 Boone Boulevard Suite 700 Vienna, Virginia 22182 I' (703) 79.0-By: ilhw- 8750 r / l • D niel E. T omey ! V . Bar No. 309 9 /J mes C. Thomp on, Jr. a. Bar No. 27863 !:Coups 1 for Miller Milling Company, Ltd. Partnership I : I - CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I: �i I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing Notice of it •Deposition was mailed, first-class, postage prepaid, this / !.day of January 1995 to the following: i i; Mchael A. Branca, Esq. . I. Thompson & Waldron !: 1055 North Fairfax Street Fourth Floor Alexandria, VA 22314 Counsel for T.E. Ibberson Cany o ; VICKWIRE GAVIN, P.C. �I I ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE 700 I' d00 BOONE BOULEVARD h I� VIENNA, VIR—I I' 22182-2642 II c:It\wp51\doc\130333.003\depo.not I I 2 COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE DAVID R. GEHR P.O. BOX 278 COMMISSIONER EDINBURG, 22824-0278 March 6, 1995 Mr. James W. Judy, Jr. Ref: C/O Judy Excavating & Landscaping 835 Huttle Road Middletown, VA 22645 Dear Jamie: -��18 ; ?:l MAP tr0S r ; RECEIVED z; DEPT. OF PLANNING y AND DEVELOPMENT > WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN, P.E. RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE(703)984.5600 FAX (703) 984-5607 Lakeview Garden Apartments Routes 642 & 1187 Frederick County In accordance with your request letter of March 3, 1995 you are given permission to install a temporary construction entrance at the reference location. This letter is to be considered your permit to do so. The following provisions will be required: Work area protection signage in accordance with the attached while working on the right-of-way will be required. All work on the right-of-way is to be confined to the temporary entrance location only. A minimum 6" depth of VDOT # 1 (2-3 inch stone) course aggregate by 30' in width will be required. It is to be placed from the edge of pavement and extended back onto private property far enough to prevent the carrying of mud onto the roadway. Positive drainage is to be maintained within the right-of-way at all times. Any disturbed areas of the right-of-way or damages to the pavement structure adjacent to this entrance will be repaired by you to our satisfaction. This permit is being issued for 180 days. All work is to be completed in accordance with the enclosed Virginia Erosion & Sediment Control Handbook, Specification 3.02. The entrance is to be installed at the location shown on the site plan prepared by G. W. Clifford & Associates dated February 2, 1995. The Department of Transportation will not be held liable for suit should such result from this operation nor is it granting permission to grade on the property of others or disturb underground utility lines. If the above listed items are not followed this permit may be revoked. Should you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, W. H. Bushman, Trans. Resident Engineer By R. B. Childress, Trans. Permits & Subd. Spec. Supv. Attach. xc Mr K A. Steele, Mr. S A. Melnikoff, Mr R W Watkins, Mr H E. Strawsnyder TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 24- 10 PRIVXI I FIRE. tiF.R\'I(:F \L\I\1 \\D I III IN .\ITL R I F.\.\\(:I•..1 7-1.2* The type and class of pipe fi)r a particular installa- tion shall be determined through consideration of its fire resistance, the maximum working pressure, the laying con- ditions under which the pipe is to be installed, soil condi- tions, corrosion, and susceptibility of pipe to other external loads, including earth loads installation beneath buildings and traffic or vehicle loads. 7-1.3 Pipe used in private fire service shall be designed to withstand a working pressure of not less than 150 psi (10.3 bars). 7-2* Coating and Lining of Pipe. All ferrous metal pipe shall be lined, and steel pipe shall be coated and wrapped with joints field -coated and wrapped after assembly. Galva- nizing does not meet the requirements of this section. 7-3* Joints. joints shall be of an approved type. 7-4* Fittings. Fittings shall be of an approved type with joints and pressure class ratings compatible with the pipe used. Steel pipe fittings shall be coated, scrapped, and lined. 7-5 Sizes of Pipe. 7-5.1* No pipe smaller than 6 in. in diameter shall be installed as a private service main. Esrepliou: For amity that do not supply hydra N.s, sizes .suurNer than 6 in. shall he permitted to he Lord sahjert to the follourix; restrictions: 1. The cumin supplh, only autoutalir sprinkler .spstent.s, ope)r sprinkler sysleuts, Crater gwa.y fxed s\strnrs, foam sYsterus, or C/rrss 11.slandpipt, syste)ns. 2. Hvrlraalir ralrrthrnious show that the train will sapph the total rlena ,ud at the appropriate pre ..rue. Alain size shall br at least (is large as lire riser 7-5.2 Tine size of the private fire service mains supplying fire protection systems shall be approved by the authority haying jurisdiction. due consideration being given to the construction and occupancy of the plant, to the fire floss and pressure of water required, and to the adequacy of the supply. 7-5.3* For purposes of estimating fi-iction loss. see A-7-5.3. Chapter 8* Rules for Laying Pipe 8-1 Depth of Cover. 8-1.1* The depth of cover over slater pipes shall be determined by the maximum depth of frost penetration in the locality where the pipe is laid. The top of the pipe shall be buried not less than I ft (0.3 in) below the frost line fire the locality. In those locations where frost is not a factor, the depth of toyer shall be not less than 21/2 ft (0.8 m) to prevent mechanical damage. Pipe raider driveways shall be buried a minimum of 3 ft (0.9 in) and under railroad tracks a minimum of 4 ft ( I._) in). 8-1.2 Depth of covering shall he measured from top of Pipe to finished grade, and (file consideration shall always be given to future or final grade and nature of soil. 8-2 Protection against Freezing. 8-2.1 Where it is impracticable to bury pipe, it ma\ be laid aboveground, provided the pipe is protected against freezing and mechanical damage, to the satisfaction of the authoritY having.lurisdic•tion. 8-2.2 Pipes shall not be placed over seater raceways or near embankment walls without special attention being given to protection against frost. 8-2.3 Where pipe is laid in water raceways or shallow streams, care shall be taken that there sill be sufficient depth of running water between the pipe and the frost line during all seasons of frost; a safer method is to bury the pipe one foot or more under the bed of the waterway - 'Care shall also be taken to keep the pipe back from the banks a sufficient distance to avoid an}• danger of freezing through the side of the bank above the slater line. Pipe shall be buried below frost line where entering the water. 8-3 Protection against Damage. 8-3.1 Pipe shall not be run under buildings. Exteptiou: Wheit ah.solalely necessary to ran pipe under haild- ing . prrial preralltloNJ Shall he taken whirh iurlade arching lire jowidation (calls over the pipe, rtnntiug pipe in rn, erect lreurlres, and providing as/tars to isolate sertiou.s of pipe under buildings. tSrr• 3-5.2.) 8-3.2 Where a riser is close to building foundations. underground fittings of proper design and type shall be used to a")id pipe joints being located in or under the foundations. 8-3.3 \fairs running tinder railroads carrying hears mucking, under large piles of' heavy commodities, or in areas subjecting the main to heavy shock and vibrations shall be subjected to an evaluation of the specific loading conditions and suitably protected, if necessary. (See 7-1.2.) 8-3.4* When it is necessary to join metal pipe with pipe of' dissimilar metal. the joint shall be insulated. b\ an approved method. against the passage of an electric current. 8-3.5 In no case shall the pipe be used for grounding of electrical services. 8-4 Care in Laying. 8-4.1 Pipes. valves, hydrants, and fittings shall be inspected fin' damage when received and shall be inspected prior to installation. Bolted joints shall be checked for proper torquing of bolts. Pipe, valves. hydrants, and fit- tings shall be clean inside. When work is stopped, open ends shall be plugged to present stones and foreign mate- rials from entering. 8-4.2 All pipe, fittings, valves, and hydrants shall be care- fully lowered into the trench with suitable equipment. They shall be carefully examined fin- cracks or other 1992 Edition SYSTEM COMPO,4Emrs 2-7.3.6 Fire department connections to sprinkler systems shall be designated by a sign having raised letters at least 1 in. (25 mm) in size cast on plate or fitting reading for service designated: e.g. — "AUTOSPKR.," "OPEN SPK.R.," or ' AUTOSPKR. and STANDPIPE." 2-7.4 Valves, 2.7.4.1 An approved check valve shall be installed in each fire department connection, located as near as practicable to the point where it joins the system. 2-7.4.2 There shall be no shutoff valve in the fire depart- ment connection. 2-7.5 Drainage. The piping between the check valve and the outside hose coupling shall be equipped with an ap- proved automatic drip. 2-7.6 Hose Connections. 2-7.6.1 The fire department connection(s) shall be internal threaded swivel fitting(s) having the NH standard thread, at least one of which shall be 2.5 — 7.5 NH standard thread, as specified in NFPA 1963, Standard for Screw Threads and Gaskets for Fire Hose Connections. Exception.- when local fire department connections do not conform to NFPA 1963, the authority having jurisdiction shall designate the connection to be used. 2-7.6.2 Hose connections shall be equipped with listed plugs or caps. 2-8 Arrangement of Water Supply Connections. 2-8.1 Connection Between Underground and Aboveground Piping. The connection between the system piping and underground piping shall be made with a suitable transition piece and shall be properly strapped or fastened by ap- proved devices. The transition piece shall be protected against possible damage from corrosive agents, solvent attack, or mechanical damage. 13-17 2-8.2- Connection Passing Through or Under Foundation Walls. When system piping pierces a foundation wall below grade or is located under the foundation wall, clear- ance shall be provided to prevent breakage of the piping due to building settlement. 2.9 Water Supply Test Connections and Gages 2-9.1' Test Connections. "Pest connections, which may also be used as drain pipes, shall be provided at locations that will permit flow tests to be made to determine whether water supplies and connections are in order. Such test connections shall be not less than the sizes specified in 3-6.2 and equipped with a shutoff valve, They shall be so installed that the valve may be opened wide for a sufficient time to assure a proper test without causing water damage. (See 3.6.2 and 3.6.4.) 2-9.2 Gages. 2-9.2.1 A pressure gage with a connection not smaller than 114 in. (6.4 min) shall be installed on the riser or feed main at or near each test connection. This gage connection shall be equipped with a shutoff valve and with provision for draining. 2.9.2.2 The required pressure gages shall be of an ap- proved type and shall have a maximum limit not less than twice the normal working pressure at the point where installed, They shall be installed to permit removal, and shall be located where they will not be subject to freezing. Chapter 3 System Compottents 3-1 Piping. 3-1.1 Piping Specifications. 3.1.1.1 Pipe or tube used in sprinkler systems shall meet or exceed the standards in Table 3-1.1.1 or be in accordance with 3-1.1.2 through 3-1.1.6. Pipe and tube used in sprin- tra- Sot% M4ul Sam Olobe Valve Wlth Arnngemenu For graining pip! 8#"On CA?a and VAIVA C.I. Flange and Spigot Rode pw 81rapping To Be Not Less Than 114" Tut Connection To Drain Fix ST Units: 1 in. - 25.4 mm. Apprn..ad Indicating Valle Floor Figure 2-9.1 Water Supply Connection with 'lost Connection. 1999 eanion JUN 23 "93 05:1 16 24-'8 FRtv,�,l'L FIRE SERVICE MALN5,VJN0'CXFlR APPL'RTEN.•lNCF5 P.3/3 3-3.2 - Post indicator vale sh be located not less than, 40 ft(112 m) from buildi Exception: When post Indic r v s cannot be placed at this diatanc4 they shall be permat to b located closer, or wall post indicator valves iced, provide they e e set .m locations by blank j walls where the passibility of fnj b� nlling walls is unlikely and from .which people are not, likely be driven by smoke or heat. Usually, in crowded plani yards, they can be placed reside low buildings. near briek stair towers, or at angles formed by suiistan- tial brick'walls that are not likely to fall. I 3-3.3 Post indicator valves shall be set so that the top of the post will be 36 in. (0.9 m) above the final grade. ' 3-3.4 Post indicator valves shall be properly protected against mechanical damage where needed. 3_4 Valves in Pits, 3-4.1. :'here it is impractical to provide a post indicator valve, valves, shall be permitted to be placed in pits with permission of the, authority having jurisdiction. 3-4.20 When used, valve pits shall be of adequate size and readily accessible for inspection, operation, testing, mainte- nance, and removal of equipment contained therein. They shall be constructed and arranged to properly protect the installed equipment from movement of earth, freezing, and accumulation of water. Poured -in -place or precast con- crcte, with'or` withotit•reinforcement, or brick.(all depend- ing upon soil conditions and size of pit) are appropriate materials for construction of valve pits. Other approved materials shall be 'permitted to be used. Where the water table* is low aiid'fhe soil is porous, crushed stone 6r gravel shall be permitted to be used for the floor of the pit. See Figure A-2-6(b) for a suggested arrangement. Valve 'pits- l'ccated at or near the base of the riser of an 'elevated tank shall be designed in accordance with Chap- ter 9 bf NFPA 22, Standard for Water 'Tanks for Privalt Fire Protection. ' 3-4.3 -I'he location of the valve shall be clearly marked, and the cover of the pit shall be kept free of obstructious. 3.5 Sectional 'V' kve :1 Lafge private fire service main systems shall have sectional 'controlling valves at appropriate points in order to permit scetionalizing the system in the event of a break. or'for the making of repairs of extensions. C3-52 A valve shall be provided on each bank where a main crosses water, and outside the building foundations) where the main or section of main mans under a building (see 8-3,1•),�. . 3-6 Identifying and Securing. Identification signs shall be provided at cacti valve to indicate its function and what it controls, • , , , • NOTE: To assure tint valves are kept open, .icc Chapter 2 of N FPA• 26, Recommended Practice for the Supervision of Valves Controlling IVater Supplies for Fire Protection. . 1992 Edllion 30F3 Chapter 4 Hydrants 4-) * General. 4-1.1 Hydrants shall be of approved type and have not less than a 6-in. p52-mm) connection with the mains. A valve shall be installed in the hydrant connection, The number, iize, and arrangement of outlets, the size of main valve opening, and the size of barrel shall be suitabic for the protection to be provided and shall be- approved by the authority having jurisdiction. Independent gate valves on 2'/;-in. (64-mm) outlets are permitted. (See Chapter 5.) 4-1.2 Hydrant outlet threads shall have the NH standard external threads for the size outlets) supplied as specified in N FPA 1963, Standard and Screw Threads fur Gaskets for Fire Hose Connections. Exception: Where local fire department connections do not ron- form to ,VFPA 1963, Standard for Screw Threads and Gaskets for Fire Hose Connections, the authority having jurisdiction shall designate the eanruc6on to be used. 4-2 Number and Location, • - 4-2.1$' Hydrants shall be provided insufficient number and be located in a manner that will enable the needed fire flow to be delivered throughihose lines to all exterior sides of any important structure. Hydrants shall be spaced in accordance with the authority having jurisdiction. Public hydrants are recognized as meeting all or part of the above requirements. 4-2.2* For average conditions, hydrants shall be placed at least, 40 .t (12.2 m) from the buildings protected. Exception! Whin hydrants cannul be placed at this distance, they shall be permitted to be locatad eloser, or wall hydrants used (see Figure A-4-2.2), provided they arc see in locations by blank .walls j where the possibility of injrcry by falling walls is unlikely and from which people art not Lkdy to be driven by smoke or heal. Usually, in crowded plant yards, they can be placed beside low buildings, guar brick stair towers or at angles formed by substantial brick walls that are not likely to fall. 4.2.3 Hydrants shall not be placed near retaining walls where there is danger of frost through the walls. 44 Installation andNaintenance." 4-3.1 Hydrants shall beset on flat stones -or concrete slabs and, if necessary, ''Shall be provided with sufficient small stones (or equivalent) placed about the drain to ensure quick drainage. 4-3.2 ' Where soil is of such a nature that the hydrants will not drain properly with the arrangement specified in 4-3.1, or ground water stands ac levels above that of the drain, the hydrant drain shall be plugged at the time of instaila- tion. If the drain is plugged, hydrants in service in cold cli- mates shall be pumped out after usage. Stich hydrants shall be marked to indicate the need for pumping out after usage. 4-3.3* The center of a hose outlet shall be not less than 18 in. (457 mm) above final grade, or when located in a, hose house, 12 in. (305'mtri) ab.o�;c the floor, MASLON EDELMAN BORMAN & BRAND a Professional Limited Liability Partnership MARVIN BORMAN CHARLES QUAINTANCE. JR NEIL L SELL MARTIN G. WEINSTEIN WILLIAM E. MUU24 WILLIAM Z. PENTELOVI7CH JOSEPH ALEXANDER GARY J. HAUGEN THOMAS H. BORMAN REBECCA PALMER MARK BAUMANN DAVID F. HERR IL LAWRENCE PURDY JAMES D. O'CONNOR RICHARD G. WI SON LEON I. ST'EINBERG LAWRENCE M- SHAPIRO HOWARD B. TARKOW WILLIAM M. MOWER P.A. LARRY A KOCH VIRGINIA A BELL JUSCIN H. PERL COOPER S. ASHLEY SALLY STOLEN GROSSMAN TERRI KRIVOSHA MARY R VARALY EDWIN CHANIN CLARK T. WHITMORE WAYNE S. MOSKOWITZ MALLORY K. MULLINS SUSAN D. HOLAPPA CHARLES A. HOFFMAN RUSSELL F. LEDERMAN, PA. RICHARD A. KEMFF MARK W. LEE LORRIE L SALLL SUSAN E. OLIPHANT ALAIN M. BAUDRY PATRICIA L REDING ANNA L KORINKO JONATHAN S. PARRITL BRiAN J. KLEIN JAMES F. KD].IAN JAMES F. HANNEMAN JEANMARIE T. SALES DAVID T. QU NBY KEVIN IL KOEPKE DOUGLAS T. HOLOD CARI.ETON B. CRU7CHFIELD JOHN D. DARLING NEIL P. AYOTTE RACHEL U. GIBBS BRENDA J. ARNDT LAURIE KINDEL FEIT OF COUNSEL ROBERT A ENGELKE MICHAEL L SNOW SAMUEL H. MASLON 1901 1988 HYMAN EDELMAN 19051993 3300 NORWEST CENTER 90 SOUTH SEVENTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 554024140 (612) 672-8200 FAX (612) 672-8397 Writer's Direct Dial: 672-8378 January 3, 1995 BY FACSUvHLE Mr. Lawrence R. Ambrogi County Attorney for Frederick County 5 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: The Arbitration Between Miller Milling Co. and T.E. Ibberson Co. Our File Nos.: 93-2232 and 93-2231 Dear Mr. Ambrogi: This letter confirms our telephone conversation of January 3, 1995, wherein we discussed my client's request for Mr. Evan Wyatt's attendance at an arbitration hearing in Minneapolis sometime during the week of January 13, 1995. I will arrange for Mr. Wyatt to be subpoened to present live testimony at the arbitration hearing. Mr. Wyatt's testimony is relevant to the general contractor's claim that it delivered the project late as a result of the owner's failure to timely secure an approved site plan from Mr. Wyatt's office. Mr. Wyatt's familiarity with site plan approval, in conjunction with his knowledge of the permitting process on this Job, will be instrumental in resolving the dispute between the general contractor and the owner. I appreciate your courtesy and the courtesy of all concerned in connection with working with Miller Milling Company to provide this very important testimony. Miller Milling Company recognizes the economic burden the County suffers by losing one of its valued employees for a day or two. Thus, Miller Milling Company hereby confirms that it will reimburse the County for Mr. Wyatt's time while he is away from his public duties. Obviously, Miller Milling Company will also arrange and pay for Mr. Wyatt's travel and accommodations. By copy of this letter to Mr. Wyatt, please be advised that my office will be in direct contact with you to arrange for your travel to Minnesota. January 3, 1995 Page 2 Thank you all for your time and hospitality. John and Herb Miller also extend their heart -felt thanks for your assistance. In the meantime, if you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Very truly yours, C, James Duffy O'Connor JDO'C/des cc: Mr. Wayne Miller (via facsimile) Mr. Evan Wyatt (via facsimile) • i REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick Cou14ty Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer Director 199 Front Royal Pike P.O. Box 618 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on U.S. 522 South, one tenth of a mile from the U.S. 50 North intersection, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: c EV WX Y //vc. 97a ,f34kek 4-4- Name of development and/or description of the request: „_ A1,2-1-%Z147 MV/Jywk�- of wA Ns 4 as iho C A r V*r AL Location: Sanitation Authority Comm A�'V/mow'- I� �/��E'�WN AOA eY/* t Sanitation Auth (NOTICE TO P% WAM L 01NOF (ks I L /N 01.I L 1400w of 40 e4fte 16 NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your application form, location map, and all other pertinent information. „2 r' dP/.ES 40 F DR w6"S N6e44FD. UNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGlb�N� ��. �� -- FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE ~- LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 051993468 Date Received 051993 Date Revieweo ()60993 Applicant Name Greenway Inc.. ---- Address 970 Baker Lane Winchester, VA 22601 Project Name Miller Milling Phone No. 703-662-4185 Type of Application Revised Site Plan Current Zoning M-1 1st Due Fire Co' 13 1st Due Rescue Co. 13 Election District Stonewall RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate Inadequate X Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yen X No .' Comments: Fire lanes required (posted) t all firu n dn Fzr lane as shown on north side of Mill Bldg' Must be 20' in wzqcn per "k� Frederick County Chapter 10. 'S' Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate Inadequate x Not Identified ' Special Hazards Noted; Yes No X Comments: _ , Hydrant Locationsa� Adequate X ln^.1equate Not Identified Siamese Connection Locati, Approved X \�.`'� ��prov�u Not lJentifieJ Additional Comments: The dth of the fire lane is the only change requested. This area )e compacted (entire 20' width) to support 65,000 lbs. __.' - Review Time .75 hr. � - Douglas A' Kiracofe Fire ha,-ihal REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS•„-. Frederick County Inspections DepartmeAt Attn: Building Offici1 P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 226011. (703) 665-5650 M The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 North Loudoun St., 2nd Floor of the Hammon Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: 6;Ae-10W.4,v iitic Name of development and/or description of the request: �/iGL�•,e /C�1iL�i�t/� Location: ISL GoL G1� 2 1WZ2, Ae Inspection Department Comments: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 306, Use Group H (High Hazard) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990 Other codes that apply are title 28 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability b lic ons and in CoAriercial Facilities. Code Administrator Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS DEPT.*PLEASE THIS F TO APP T.) NOTE: Table 905.2 for rating of exterio alls NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. -14- - .: 0 - '? 1 F FR I 1 --4- ' A • P . Fi 2 PROJECT HARVEST Project Review Meeting A G E N D A DATE: Tuesday, September 24, 1991 PLACE: Ed Strawsnyder, Jr. Director of Engineering County of Frederick 9 N. Loudoun Winchester, VA 22601 (703) 665-5643 SPECIAL GUEST REQUESTED: 7:00 - 7:30 Introductions, present current plans and schedule to county personnel 7:30 - 7:45 Discussion on permitting process 7:45 - 8:30 Requirements for land disturbance permit including erosion and sedimentation control 8:35 Copy of E&SC Handbook 8:35 - 10:00 Discussion on drainage and stormwater management, 100 year flood plain elevation, flood plain acres Copy of Flood Insurance Study and Flood Plain Study 10:00 - 12:00 Utility requirements and regulations (SA) a) Sanitary Sewage (GC) b) Gas (WC) c) Water (JR) d) Electric ♦ How far into site will Potomac Edison extend 34.5 KV line? ♦ I.A.C. of 34.5 KV line ♦ Potomac Edison to provide fusing at their disconnect pole? F F' I 1 4: 40 • ,It H. B. ALEXANDER & BON, INC. Contractors/Construction Managers 315 Voughn Street • P.O. Sox 1626 Harrisburg, PA 17106-1525 TO: SEE DISTRIBUTION BELOW DATE: September 20, 1991 R E: PROJECT HARVEST Job #91-2581 7 -V P . 0 1 SER 2 g PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED THE FOLLOWING: One (1) copy of Project Harvest - Project Review Meeting Agenda for Tuesday, 9/24/91. FAXED TO THE FOLLOWING: SSOE - Gary McGreery - (419) 255-6101 BFC - Ed ]Buchan - 534-5114 County of Frederick - Ed Strawsnyder - (703) 678-0682 REMARKS: For review and continent. RJD:oh H. , ALPXANDE & SON, g _�- Ro -er ., e zor project, fUAnag -20-5+ 1 F R I 1 =1 _ P . 0 (DOT) (BE) (JM) Ft. (JT) ♦ Can disconnect pole be in private swi.tchgear yard? ♦ Where can we hook up to temporary power? 12:00 - 12:30 Lunch 12:30 - 1:00 VA DOT - ♦ Specifications and standard details ♦ Traffic Control Plans 1;00 - 3;00 Discussion on site plan requirements ♦ For submission to county ♦ Property boundaries and existing easements ♦ Existing pavement design and traffic counts ♦ Requirements particular to Collier 1 Building Code Compliance ♦ Classification of Building Use Codes, Mezzanines, etc. ♦ Zoning & use of adjacent properties 3;00 - 4:00 Other discussions ♦ Spill control. along railroad ♦ signage permit - 2 - Winchester, VA Ed Strawsnyder John Trenary Potomac Edison Water Co. Sewage Auth. Gasp Co. John McAlvaine Bruce Edens V.DOT Hershey Ed Buchan Dave Dunlap Sue Weaver SSOE Jay Lingnell Dennis Lecklack Mike Andrvvich Jackie Moog HBA Bole DeFiore Anticipated Attendance (ES) (JT) (JR) (WC) (SA) (GC) (JM) (BE) (DOT) (EB) (DD) (SW) (JL) (DL) (MA) (JM2) (BD) - 3 - MEETING REPORT NO. 19 DATE HELD: December 12, 1991 SUBJECT: Project "Harvest" SSOE Job No. 911173 LOCATION: Project Harvest Jobsite Trailer Winchester, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE: Ed Buchan - HFC Earle Boyer - HFC Doug Kirakofe - Winchester County Joseph Dickey - HFC Don Himes - H. B. Alexander Jeff Neubauer - Factory Mutual Nick Mariano - SSOE DISTRIBUTION: All SSOE in Attendance Ed Buchan - HFC Bob DeFiore - H. B. Alexander Ed Strawsnyder - Winchester County John Whitacre - Winchester County Evan Wyatt - Winchester County John Trenary - Winchester County Doug Kirakofe - Winchester County Ronald Then - Buhler Gary McCreery - SSOE Ed Royzman - SSOE Tom Papademos - SSOE Noli Bandelaria - SSOE Lee Grant - SSOE Jay Lingnell - SSOE Norm Rehm - SSOE Jackie Mogg - SSOE Dennis Lechlak - SSOE Dave Harrison - SSOE Mike Androvich - SSOE Preen Charles - SSOE Dan Walch - SSOE Glenn Meiring - SSOE �i The meeting was held to review the current fire protection design. The following are comments concerning the facility. Submitted: Nick Mariano H ERSH EY \ 911173 \ BREP.4 SSOE, INC. • 1001 MADISON AVENUE • TOLEDO, OHIO 43624 COMMONWEALTH of 'VIRCINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 December 18, 1991 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ref.: Project Harvest Mr. Dennis A. Incorporated P.E. Hershey Foods Corporation C/O SSOE, Incorpora 1001 Madison Avenue Fort Collier Industrial Park - Route 1322 &1323 Toledo, OH 43624 Frederick County Dear Mr. Lechlak: As requested, we have reviewed the above referenced site plan dated November 21, 1991. Our recommendations may be found on the enclosed plans marked in red and as follows: 1. The proposed methods of access to the site appear satisfactory. However, your access roadways should be extended and shoulders adjusted as noted to tie into the Park Center Drive and Brooke Road cul-de-sac's. Also the proposed 1.04 percent grade of the access roadway from Park Center Drive should be reversed to provide positive drainage away from the cul-de-sac pavement surface. 2. A drainage structure with an approximate 96 square foot opening will be required under the Park Center Drive access roadway at the Redbud Run Crossing. A design plan of this structure with supporting hydraulic calculations will be required for review by this office prior to our approval of this site plan. 3. The recordation plat (Copy Attached) of this site indicates a 30' drainage easement along the southeastern property line. The design engineer of the Brooke Road Project, Greenway, Incorporated, is also proposing a 30' drainage easement with 8' flat -bottom ditch in this location. Your design should be revised to correspond with that of the previously approved Greenway design. 4. Minor changes will be necessary to the typical section pavement design as noted. 5. Absolutely no work associated with this project is to extend onto the adjoining Interstate 81 right-of-way. A comment to this effect should be added to this plan as noted. Also, a straw bale siltation barrier will be required at the right-of-way line upstream from our drainage structure under Interstate 81 to prevent any sedimentation from entering our right-of-way. TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTUR'i Mr. Dennis A. Lechlak, P.E. December 18, 1991 Page Two Please revise and resubmit four (4) copies for further review. Should any changes be deemed necessary, please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Again, I would like to remind you that this office has made no review of the proposed railroad spur. Any review in this regard should be coordinated directly with our Rail and Public Transportation Division in Richmond. For your information their address is 1401 East Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman, P.E. Transportation Resident Engineer 67a By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permit and Subdivision Specialist Senior RBC/sg Enclosures xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. C. E. Mattox Mr. D. W. Hawkins Rail and Public Transportation Division Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. H. Ed Strawsnyder PROJECT "HARVEST".. SSOE JOB N0. 911173 MEETING NOTES December 12, 1991 1. The fire protection system is currently designed with a 12-inch city water line being installed into the fire water pump house from Park Center Drive which fills a 300,000- gallon grade level storage tank. This scheme was implemented because the county system was incapable of providing adequate water pressure and volume for Project Harvest. The fire protection requirements are 3,000 gpm at 37 psi at the property line. However, Frederick County has hired Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates to perform an hydraulic analysis on the existing water supply. Their conclusion states when the new Stonewall tank is connected into the county system and the 12-inch loop is completed from Park Center Drive to Brooke, there will be adequate volume of water for the fire protection. Mr. ;eff Ncubauer stated he would contact the county to determine when these improvements will be implemented and a reliability study on the entire county water system. The results of these two (2) items will be available by February 1, 1992. If these improvements are implemented, the 300,000-gallon tank can be eliminated. 2. Change the current 10-inch supply from the firewater pump house to the fire protection loop to 12-inches. 3. Change the riser lead-in number four which supplies the shipping/receiving warehouse from 8-inches to 10-inches. 4. Relocate 20 feet north one (1) 10-inch section control valve on Drawing C-36. 5. Terminate all future lead-ins to the proposed distribution warehouse at the post indicator valves with a blind flange. 6. The concrete pad for the future distribution warehouse is currently shown to be 550,000 square feet. The actual proposed warehouse is 440,000 square feet which would require ten (10) sprinkler risers. Currently, there are nine future risers shown. It was decided that the additional one (1) would be cut in at a future date since the warehouse is still very tentative. If the warehouse would ever expand, the additional risers will be cut in at a future mate.. 7. The entire 10-inch fire protection loop will be installed under the base bid contract. 8. Install 20-pound carbon dioxide fire extinguishers in the switchgear, electrical, and control rooms. 9. Change the presently designed diesel fire pump to electric driven fire pump. 10. State all material and equipment shall be Factory Mutual approved in specifications. 11. Add a note stating that all gridded sprinkler systems shall be equipped with a relief valve as indicated in NFPA 13, Section 5.3.1. Page 2 of 3 REV. 0 PROJECT NO. 911173 HERSHEY\911173\BREP.4 DECEMBER 12, 1991 . PROJECT "HARVEST":: ' SSOE JOB .NO. 911173 MEETING NOTES December 12, 1991 12. All fire hose stations shall be supplied from an adjacent sprinkler systems. 13. Sprinkler systems shall be designed with a minimum of 10 psi safety factor at the pump discharge. 14. Jockey pump pressure shall be changed from 140 psi to 175 psi. 15. Jockey pump shall cut in at 160 psi, shut-off at 175 psi, and the main fire pump shall cut -in at 150 psi. 16. Automatic sprinkler riser number four shall be manifolded to allow for future in -rack sprinklers. Riser shall be capped off 10'-0" above finished floor. 17. All inspectors test connections shall be installed to the exterior of the building. 18. Mezzanine Storage Rooms 225 and 226 cannot be utilized for plastic storage or sprinkler density would have to be revised. 19. The elevator machine room and the sprinkler at the bottom of the elevator shaft will be supplied from the same control valve, located 1'-6" above the lobby ceiling chain locked open. There will be a sign on the ceiling tile saying, "Sprinkler control valve located above ceiling." 20. The smoke detectors for the preaction system shall individually alarm each of the three (3) rooms separately at the preaction panel. 21. Hershey would request the exterior south wall of the shipping/receiving warehouse match the remaining facility. When the distribution warehouse is constructed, a Maximum Foreseeable Loss (MFL) wall would be constructed separating the shipping/receiving warehouse from the distribution warehouse. SSOE will forward plans of this wall (non- MFL wall) to Factory Mutual for their approval. 22. Audible and visual alarms are being utilized for the fire alarm system throughout the entire facility. The above items will be incorporated into the overall project design. If there are any corrections or additions, please contact the writer within five (5) working days. Page 3 of 3 REV. p PROJECT' NO. 911173 HE RSHEY\911173\BREP.4 DECEMBER 12, 1991 • MEETING REPORT NO. 18 DATE HELD: December 10, 1991 SUBJECT: Project "Harvest" SSOE Job No. 911173 LOCATION: County Offices Winchester, Virginia IN ATTENDANCE: Ed Strawsnyder - Winchester County John Whitacre - Winchester County Evan Wyatt - Winchester County John Trenary - Winchester County Don Himes - H. B. Alexander Dennis Lechlak - SSOE Jay T.ingnell - SSOE DISTRIBUTION: All SSOE in Attendance Ed Buchan - HFC Bob DeFiore - H. B. Alexander Ed Strawsnyder - Winchester County John Whitacre - Winchester County Evan Wyatt - Winchester County John Trenary - Winchester County Ronald Then - Buhler Gary McCreery - SSOE Ed Royzman - SSOE Tom Papademos - SSOE Noli Bandelaria - SSOE Lee Grant - SSOE Nick Mariano - SSOE Norm Rehm - SSOE Jackie Mogg - SSOE Dave Harrison - SSOE Mike Androvich - SSOE Prem Charles - SSOE Dan Walch - SSOE Glenn Meiring - SSOE The purpose of this meeting was to review the status of site plan permit and review preliminary architectural, structural, mechanical, fire protection, and electrical drawings for Project Harvest with the Winchester County Building and Zoning authorities. Submitted: Jay Lingnell HERSHEY/911173/SREP6 L�, nFr 1 inns SSOE, INC. • 1001 MADMON AVENUE • TOLEDO, OHio 43624 0 PROJECT "HARVESTr1':`:':::' <`'::.; SS OE JOB.NO. 911173 MEETING NOTES DECEMBER 10, 1991 SANITARY REVIEW - TOHN WHITACRE 1. Last week a representative from Miller Milling informed Winchester County authorities that an underground conveying device for transfer of material from the railroad to the mill would cross the sanitary sewer between Manhole 101 and Manhole 102. Due to this new requirement, it is necessary to change the type of pipe between Manhole 101 and Manhole 102 to ductile iron. 2. John Whitacre indicated that if the sanitary sewers are separated, the meter used to read flow must be of the type indicated in the Winchester County detail. It may be necessary to have waste flow straight through meter within structure for some distance on either side. 3. John Whitacre indicated the firewater and city water pipes can be in the same trench as long as a 2-foot clearance is maintained between pipes and 8 inches beside and 6 inches above and below are backfilled with CBR 30 material and compacted. The pipe type is to be ductile iron Class 52. 4. The sanitary manhole details on C-45 can be deleted. A note will be added to construct the manholes according to Winchester County, Virginia standard. 5. When the above comments are incorporated, SSOE is to forward two sets to John Whiteacre and he will approve or approve as noted and list any exceptions. 6. John commented that plans were very good. PLANNING AND ZONING - EVAN WYATT 1. The following comments and information can be added to the cover sheet or overall site plan. 1.1 Zoning designation of this property 1.2 Zoning designation of adjacent properties 1.3 Height of structures 1.4 Outdoor storage location (indicate none at this time) 1.5 Outdoor trash location (indicate none at this time) 1.6 FAR-1 calculations 2. Calculations for parking should be shown on C-47. 3. Indicate striping or add note defining truck striping requirements listed in county zoning book. Page 2 of 5 REV. 0 PROJECT NO. 911173-02 HERSHEY /911173 /SREP6 DECEMBER 10, 1991 PROJECT "RARV'EST":: ; >: .. SSOE JOBNO. 911173 MEETING NOTES DECEMBER 10, 1991 4. The islands shown in the parking area are acceptable for landscaping requirements. The east side of the site should indicate a buffer meeting zoning requirements. The existing landscape may be adequate, but note that 10-foot wide landscape material is required. Evan Wyatt will evaluate in field if the existing landscaping is adequate. 6. The erosion and sedimentation control plan were approved on November 21, 1991. 7. The final site plan submittal should incorporate all comments from county authorities. The site plan application should be included with the final site plan sub-,ruttal. 8D Evan Wyatt met with a representative of the mill last week. He recommended the mill retain SSOE to complete the site plan in the area of the mill. If the mill does not retain SSOE, it will be necessary for the mill to submit separate site plans. If the miller does not retain SSOE, the area occupied by the mill is to be indicated as another phase of the site plan approval. FIRE MARSHALL - DOUG KIRAKOFE Mr. Kirakofe could not make this meeting due to an emergency issue that came up this morning. His review comments are attached. 2. Thursday, November 12, 1991, the Fire Marshall, Factory Mutual, SSOE's fire protection engineer, Nick Mariano, and representatives from Winchester, Hershey, and H. B. Alexander will meet to resolve the issue of whether the firewater tank is required or if 12-inch waterline will be looped across Hershey property from Park Center Drive to Brooke Road. STORM DRAINAGE REVIEW - ED STRAWSNYDER 1. The retention area and mill area should be included in storm water runoff calculations. Dennis Lechlak will update and submit to Ed Strawsnyder. 2. Ed had additional questions on calculations submitted by SSOE, which were cleared up by running copies of additional calculation sheets that Dennis had not included in submittal. ROAD SYSTEM COMMENTS 1. Ed indicated that the local soils and base materials are prone to hold water rather than provide good drainage. This leads to shorter pavement life than expected. He made the following comments with this in mind. Page 3 of 5 REV. 0 PROJECT NO. 911173-02 HERSHEY/911173/SREP6 DECEMBER 10, 1991 • PROJECT "iARVE5T" 'SSOE JOB N0. 911173..: MEETING NOTES DECEMBER 10, 1991 2. Ed questioned why the road along the west side of the warehouse was sloped to the east. The intention was to slope away from future warehouse so that pavement from building could slope across the road. SSOE will investigate what is required to crown the road and add a swale, so that there is a swale on both sides of the road. 3. The road that runs between the Production Building and the mill will be changed from inverted crown to crown. This will require some rework of storm underground near the entry, the rail shed, and silo area. This change will be incorporated with the updating of the site to reflect the latest arrangement at the mix/regrind area. Don Himes, of H. B. Alexander, is aware of the changes coming in this area and will advise Perry Engineering the rough site grading and underground sub. 4. Add elevations shown on a sketch in the erosion and sedimentation control calculations to ES-3 as a detail. 5. Verify capacity of 5/8-inch diameter and 1/2-inch diameter bars shown on Detail Joint A. 6. Review lane tie joint detail with regard to depth of joint, using smooth rather than deformed bar, and the time indicated as to when saw cutting is allowed. Saw cutting should be done as soon as possible after concrete has "set." 7. Consider eliminating wire fabric in 10-inch thick concrete pavement. 8. Ed indicated there should be nothing to prevent H. B. Alexander from proceeding with construction at this time. BUILDING OVERVIEW - TOHN TRENARY 1. John indicated the permits for mechanical and electrical trades should be procured by the subcontractors performing this work. 2. Door 141A in trucker toilet should swing out to provide handicap accessibility. 3. Make sure one urinal in each men's toilet is dropped to proper height for handicap accessibility. 4. Verify guardrail spacing meets code on stairs, landings, etc. 5. Provide smoke alarms in supply and return of air -handling units in areas of hazardous occupancy. Page 4 of 5 REV. 0 PROJECT NO. 911173-02 HERSHEY/911173/SREP6 DECEMBER 10, 1991 • 0 ".PROJECT "HARVEST". . ' <`.SSOE JOB NO. ,911173 ..: MEETING NOTES DECEMBER 10, 1991 6. John indicated that a few weeks are necessary to review general plans once final submittal is made. It appears there is adequate definition on the plans at this time. 7. The plans for the silo enclosure and train shed can be submitted with the main building. 8. The code references on the drawings are very helpful, as well as the designations for fire ratings of walls on the floor plans. Page 5 of 5 REV. 0 PROJECT NO. 911173-02 HERSHEY /911173 / SREP6 DECEMBER 10, 1991 u1-4 � �� COU..�, OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 1209911099 Date Received 112391 Date Reviewed 120991 Applicant Name S.S.O.E. Address 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 Project Name Hershey Foods Phone No. 419-255-3830 Type of Application 1st Due Fire Co. 13 Election District Site Plan Stonewall Current Zoning M-1 1st Due Rescue Co. 13 RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Pump and additional on site storage which are planned per Factory Mutual. Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No Comments: Posted fire lanes required at all hydrants and siamese connections in accordance.with Frederick County Chapter 10' Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted; Yes X No Comments: Details on future mill showing access and hydrant locations cessary. ��v v �1992 0��0 UH 0 Hydrant Locations; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Connection Location; Approved X Not Approved Not Identified Additional Comments: 1> Several hydrants are shown 20' from curb. Chapter 10 of the Frederick County Code requires hydrants within 3' of curb. 2) Hydrants in parking areas must be placed away from parking spaces. 3) Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times during construction. 4> Burning of construction debris is not permitted. 5> All valves, PIV`s and pipe installation shall meet requirements of F.C.S.A. Review Time 1.5 hr. 0 1 Doug diracofe Fire Marshal M1 ,'J COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINJA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 Fax - (703) 984-9761 October 31, 1991 Mr. James McIlvaine Ref: Ft. Collier Suite 600 6231 Leesburg Pike Falls Church, VA 22044 Dear Mr. McIlvaine: WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Industrial Park Route 1322 Frederick County This is to follow-up on our phone conversation this morning concerning the referenced project. You indicated Hershey Foods, Inc. would like to begin construction on their new plant in approximately thirty (30) days and in order to do so would need access from Park Center Drive. This would entail constructing Park Center Drive from its current intersection with West Brooke Road to the Hershey property line, a distance of approximately 1300'±. You said you would like to at least have the roadway subgrade cut and stone base installed to serve the site over the winter months and any soiled stone could be removed and replaced prior to pavement being placed next spring. As I said we have no overall objections to your proposal. However, we just recently received the site plans for this section of Park Center Drive for review purposes. As you know our review may take up to sixty (60) days and necessitate changes to the plan. Therefore, please understand any additional measures and/or changes which may result from our review will need to be implemented prior to completion of construction and/or addition of the street into the State's Secondary Road System. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Transs..,' Resident/ Engineer/ By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior xc : Mr. Robert L . Moore Mr. Dwight W. Hawkins lm Mr. John Riley " 4 Mr. Robert W. Watkins Mr. H. Ed Strawsnyder Mr. H. Bruce Edens TRANSPORTAT!C =0R THE 21 ST CENTURY REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Inspections Department Attn: Building Official P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5650 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 North Loudoun St., 2nd Floor of the Hammon Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: SSOE, Inc., 1001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43624 419-255-3830, Attention: Jay Lingnell Name of development and/or description of the request: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility Location: 540 Park Center Drive Ft. Collier Industrial Park Winchester, VA 22601 Inspection Department Comments: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and sec. tions 305 Use Group F, (Factory), 306 Use Group H,-(High Hazard), and 310 Use Group S (Storage) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other.code that applies is the ANSI A117.1-1986 standard for physi/?al� handicapped people. Code Administrator Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS DEPT.*PLEASE ETURN THIS FORM TO A ICANT.)� NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately,a's possible in order to assist the agency with their review. '*'Also,":- please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. -14- FEB 18 09Z REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County County Inspections Department Attn: Building Official P.O. Box 601 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5650 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 North Loud'oun St., 2nd Floor of the Hammon Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: SSOE, Inc., 1001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43624 419-255-3830, Attention: Jay Lingnell Name of development and/or description of the request: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility Location: 540 Park Center Drive Ft. Collier Industrial Park Winchester, VA 22601 Inspection Department Comments: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and secktions 305 Use Group F, (Factory), 306 Use Group H,•(High Hazard), and 310 Use Group S (Storage) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other code that applies is the ANSI A117.1-1986 standard for physical handicapped people. Code Administrator Signature & Date: ( J� /=- Y--V (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS DEPT.+PLEA RETURN THIS FORM TO ICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. -14- I FEB 1 g W2 i REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COYJ'E?•'TS Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (703) 964-4133 The local office of the Transportation Department is located at 1550 Commerce St. in Winchester if you prefer to hand deliver this form. Applicant's name, address and phone nubber: HOE, Inc., 4 001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43624 (419) 255-3830 ATT,�: Mr. Jay Lingnell Nine of development and/or description of the request: HErshE\' Pasta Group New Facilit%, Location: 540 Part: Center Dri%,e Ft. Collier Industrial Park WinchEstEr, VA 22601 Va. Dept. of Transportation Comments: See attached letter from W. H. Bushman to S.S.O.E., Inc. dated 01/31/92. VDOT Signature and Date: (NOTICE TO RESIDENT ENGINEERAPLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO AOPPLICANT. ) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to conplete this form as accurately as Possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach three copies of your plans and/or application form. -10- FEB 1 g I992 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COYY.rNTS Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer P.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (703) 984-4133 The local office of the Transportation Department is located at 1550 Commerce St. in Winchester if you prefer to hand deliver this fora. Applicant's name, address and phone number: SSOE, Inc., 3001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43624 (419) 255-3530 ATT,�: Mr. Jay Lingnell Name of development and/or description of the request: HErshE\' Pasta Group lNew Facility Location: 540 Park Center Drive Ft. Collier Industrial Park WinchE=ter, VA 22601 Va. Dept. of Transportation Comments: See attached letter from W. H. Bushman to S.S.O.E., Inc. dated 01/31/92. VDOT Signature and Date: �% ��r,,.. '4 zaw (NOTICE TO RESIDENT ENGI2:EER•PLEASE , . -- RETURN TEIS FORM TO /30 A-PPL 1 CHANT. ) NOTICE TO APPLICA2r'T It is your responsibility to complete this fora as accurately as Possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, Please attach three copies of your plans and/or application fora. -10- wo ■/ REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Sanitation Authority. Attn: Engineer Director P.O. Box 618 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the 2nd floor of the old Frederick Co. Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: SSOE, Inc., 1001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 43624 419-255-3830, Attention: Jay Linqnell Name of development and/or description of the request: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility Location: Ft. Collier -Industrial Park Winchester, VA 22601 Sanitation Authority Comments: 8LlrE L /.YE �°�ii'ils fly Ff,B � 92 c Sanitation Authority Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO SANITATION AUTHORITY * RN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as _! possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach two copies of your plans and/or application form. -3� �-- 36 C• y8 LC�GOMC -3y 38 Fif-6 -11- _3 s -ys ED FEB 5 - 1992 OE, INC, COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER JanuarY 31, 1993 TELE (7031984 4133 FAX (703) 984 9761 Mr. Dennis A. Lechlak, F.E. Ref: Project Harvest C,10 S.S.O.E., Inc. He)-sheY Foods Corporation 1001 Madison Avenue Ft, Collier Industrial Palk Toledo, OH 43624 Routes 13'2 c 1323 Shenandoah Count Y, vZ1 Tea) c. Lechlak: Ve are in receipt of the referenced pi-oject's remised site plans dated Jarivai.v 23, 1992. all of our earlier reco::.:.e,)d tio:)_ appea)- to tiave been add;-essed. Therefore, the plat) is appi-oved contingent upon the Frederick Cou:;i�- En_;i►.eerinS Pepart.:.ent 's review and acceptan:e of the proposed di-ai)iage _ ti-uctv;-e 6dj6cent to the Park Center Price entrance, As recentlx* discussed we will require written confir.-Ilion of thei)- approval of the structure der],;)) for ou)- files. .lso after discussions with ou;' Rail 61 Public Transpo)-t�-tion D].-islon we Live foetid s1nCe no application for- State p.,)-ticipitio,i itj fu,)dinS for the proposed r:+il spur- h s bee,) :..ade, a rccview of the 1:4i1 access will ))ot be necess_ i-v b1• the I+epsrt:. cent . . Flex,=e drisr the of nei- of our appr-o;-a1 and th.,t all entrance design . drai):age related fea t vi-es ::.us t be co:-pl et ed in accoi-d:r,ice with cui-i-ent VDOT s t and,,rd_ a,)d specifications. S';ould you have aii.v questions concerninS the above or during; constructio,i, please let :.:e 1;;,ow. Sincerer%, W llia-: H. F.usk.an Trans. Resident Enfineer A - By: Robert B. Childress Hw.%,-. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior F.FC'rf Enclosure j� � r xc: Mr. Robert L. Moore � L` Attn: Mr. Paul R. Epperly F_ Mr. D. 4 Hawkins (w' copy of plan) FEB I Mi-. George Conner R. W. Watkins Mr. H. E. St rawsm-der Perry Engineering Copan) Mr. Don McIlvaine TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY ,r si c C • •` �91, COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER RESIDENT ENGINEER January 31, 1992 TELE (703) 984-4133 FAX (703) 984-9761 Mr. Dennis A. Lechlak, P.E. Ref: Project Harvest C/0 S.S.O.E., Inc. Hershey Foods Corporation 1001 Madison Avenue Ft. Collier Industrial Park Toledo, OH 43624 Routes 1322 & 1323 Shenandoah County, VA Dear Mr. Lechlak: We are in receipt of the referenced project's revised site plans dated January 23, 1992. All of our earlier recommendations appear to have been addressed. Therefore, the plan is approved contingent upon the Frederick County Engineering Department's review and acceptance of the proposed drainage structure adjacent to the Park Center Drive entrance. As recently discussed we will require written confii-mition of their approval of the structure design for our files. Also after- discussions with our Rail & Public Transportation Division we have found since no application for State participation in funding for the proposed rail spur has been made, a review of the rail access will not be necessary by the Department. Please advise the owner of our approval and that all entrance design & drainage related features must be completed in accordance with current VDOT standards and specifications. Should you have any questions concerning the above or during construction, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer A - By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permrits & Subd, Spec. Senior RBC/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. Robert L. Moore Attn: Mr. Paul R. Epperly Mr. D. W. Hawkins (w/ copy of plan) Mr. George Conner Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. H. E. Strawsnyder Perry Engineering Company Mr. Don Mcllvaine TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY ***** P.01 * TRANSACTION REPORT * FEB- 3-92 MC-It-4 1055 * * ' |� START SENDER RX TIME PAGES NOTE * -- - -_-_---_ * � 10:53 1 703 984 9761 1'32� 2 U * * ++**+^+***** y DFIT *L : 1-703-984- a761 F, d ate' 1G :46 Pdo .002 F .01 Fax Transmittal Memo 7672 No of age, TWa62aDe Tin* To �03/92 Mr. EV,an Wyau From Bob Childress "��r<=deri.ck Co. Planning comparl��, LOcatlon Dept rnaege Telept,one N Fax M ToleYhCre N Original r' Dlspcsit47n, t -I Devroy U R@tui i` Call for pickup t t L * 7 :rJ COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0, BOX 276 RAY D. PEiHTFL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H BUSHMAN 'TiMMS 'chCR RE aDChr EhLiNEEP January 31, 1992 TELE ;7U31 984-4133 FAX 17,)3, 984 9761 M Deriuis A. Lechl;ak, P.E. Ref: Project Ha,vest . S..S.0,F., Inc. Her'-shey Foods corporation 1001 Madison Avenue Ft. Collier .Industii:al Park Toledo, nH 43624 Routes 1321 & 131) Sheivin loah County, VA DF- �r' 'fr. Gp�hlalc: we are in receipt of the refet'r_nc_d project's revised sit, Plans dared JantTaly 23, 1992. All of our e i`lier i'ecorruue,)dations appeal- to Nlt,e, been adds-essed. Thcieft)1'e, the plan 1.-z approved contingent upon the Frederick County FticineP!"ing Depa) tment', review and icCeptance of the proposed drainage structure adj.icent to the Park Center Drive entranCe. As recently discus, d T>r will require Urirten confil'x,itioi of their approval of the structure design for ouc files. Also after di.gcussions with our Rail & Puh11c Transportatiorr Division we hai,e found since no a1)1)licati0n for State Participation in ftinding for the propo:rd rail zPN' leas bear --.ail,', a rc,, icw of the ra i' access will not be neces,z:-3ry by the Depa) l tits ti r , Ple.lse advise the ow,Tet of our approval and that all entrcaltcr iesign 4rir:iin.:age relatpd fcatures ;nus•r be c'oripleted 2n cicco)'dancE, With cuitent VDC)T Sta � w.• l;ld speClfic-atlnns, .: .. Should you hive any questions concfrrnirng the above or during, 1 e t rle know, Sincer-ely, Willian, H. Bn.tihwa n Teat,: ResidNut Ei)gin,er B Y . i- F'r RRC/rf Enc 1 os ur_e xc: Mi . Rob,>z t L. Mooi,e Attn: M4 . Paul R. Eppowr 11, Mr. D. ' Hawkins (w, coast of Mr. Leo ,-, Conner W. R. W. Wadi ins Perry F►tG'itt� inn„l�,yi 5' M)'. Dort lfc 1 ANSPORTAT,-,)N F, , EN '~ RE4L'EST _U8__6ITE PLAN CO"ENTS Virginia Department of Transportation Attn: Resident Engineer F.O. Box 278 Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278 (703) 984-4133 The :oca office of the Transportation Department is located at 1550 Co=urce St. in Winchester if you prefer to hand deliver this Drtl . ApnYicant's name, address and phone Dumber: : r, inc., 4001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, OH 4362=+ (419) 255-38.30 AM,*: Mr. Jay Lingnell _ Name of development and/or description of the request: Err_- ii�-y Pasta Croup New Facility LacatiOn: 540 l'arb' Center Drive Ft` Collier Industrial Parma Winclhester, VA 22601 Va. Dept. of Transportation Comments: See attached letter from W. H. Bushman to S.S.O.E., Inc. dated 01/31/92. VDOT Signature and Date: (NOTICE To RESIDENT ENGINEER•PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO PLIC ',j•) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as ace `ely as possible in order to assist the agency with their nevi Also, please attach three copies of your plans and/or application form. FS-3! i u REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS R'EOtIt� YCD Frederick County Engineering Department F �J Attn: Director of Engineering Ee 107992 P.O. Box 601 SSOE 1� Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5643 �.. The Frederick County Engineering Department is located at 9 North Loudoun St., 2nd Floor of the Hammon Building in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: SSOE, INC., 1001 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43624 419-255-3830, Attention: Jay Lingnell Name of development and/or description of the request: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility Location: 540 Park Center Drive Ft. Collier -Industrial Park Winchester, VA 22601 Engineers Comments: The site plan submitted on January 21, 1992, is approved by the Engineering Department contingent upon the resolution of the attached comments. Engineers Signature & Date: ) /j (NOTICE TO ENGINEERING DEPT.*PLEASE R,TURN THIS FORM TO PPLIC T.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach two copies of your plans and/or application form. r FEB I g -13- l 0 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering & Inspections 703 665-5643 FAX: 703 678-0682 FREDERICK COUNTY ENGINEER 9 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET, 2ND FLOOR WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 665-S643 SITE PLAN DATE: February 6, 1992 PROJECT: Hershey Pasta Group New Facility 540 Park Center Drive Fort Collier Industrial Park Frederick County, Virginia DESIGNER: Jay Lingnell SSOE, Inc. 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 COMMENTS 1) Submit designs and supporting hydrologic/hydraulic calculations for box culverts at Park Center Drive extended and at the railroad crossing. 2) Consider super elevating loop road at horizontal curves shown on Sheets C-33 and 34. 3) Construction joint detail i rd i =at.Ps 5 /8" and 1 /2" deformed and smooth dowells, respectively. We L-ecoramen^ that the dowell size be consistent with the one (1) inch bar specified for the transverse/longitudinal joints. Also, the saw cut depth should be one -quarter the pavement thickness rather than one-third. Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr P.E.' &L1J Director of Engineering `F- _ f'EB 1 g 19y'L 9 ?North Loudoun St. - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester. Virginia- -- - 22601 i ( FEB 1 8 19y'L APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST ---- Your site plan should include the following: Administrative Information Y N / 1. Name of proposed development. 2. Name and address of owner. 3. Name and address of developer. 4. Name, address and phone number of designer. i 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer or architect. 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions. 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval. 8. A space labeled "approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval. General Site Information Y N / 9. Location map (scale 1:2000) —� 10. Magisterial District of site i 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 12. North Arrow 13. Zoning of site 14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties Lots/Uses/Buildings and Structures Y N 15. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels / 16. Acreage of all lots included in the plan 17. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas 18. Location of all buildings, structures and uses / 19. The proposed use of each building, structure and area i 20. The location and type of all dwelling units / 21. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning district 22. The height of all buildings and structures 23. The 1location and dimensions of all signs LocoT� D->'1 /S eS7* J/IShF're, 51tt r!io� ye - G' E l e r eo , n a-,J . -7- • Lots/Uses/Buildings and Structures (con't) C v� : FEB 1 g 1992 Y N 24. Location of outdoor lighting fixtures 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas 26. Location and area of common open space 27. Location and description of all recreation facilities 28. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways 29. Location of outdoor trash receptacles Roads Y N 30. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site ( V' V l' u. r No t 'f "a n e !e) 31. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site �L 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement and construction of planned roads 33. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways Utilities Y N �L 34. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains and laterals 35. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility and drainage easements 36. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants and all other facilities necessary to meet the Fire Code requirements Parking Y N 37. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces ✓ 38. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing and other features to be used ,/ 39. Location and dimension of all handicapped spaces U • Natural Features Y N 40. Existing and finished contour lines 41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains wetland, sinkholes and other environmental features ✓ 42. Location of streams and drainage ways Landscaping Y N ✓ 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used 44. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles. ll Cro.: SPA�,w.s� Pao nc+ r��'� , (f-C CV ., V: Erosion and Sediment Control Y N ✓ 45. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used ✓ 46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with location, types and examples of provisions to be used • DRAWING LIST C-31 OVERALL SITE PLAN C-32 NOT USED C-33 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-34 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-35 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-36 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-37 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-38 PARTIAL SITE UTILITIES AND GEOMETRICS C-39 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-40 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-41 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-42 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-43 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-44 PARTIAL GRADING PLAN C-45 SITE DETAILS C-46 SITE DETAILS C-47 CONCRETE JOINING & PAVEMENT STRIPING PLAN C-48 SANITARY SEWER PROFILE C-49 NOT USED C-50 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-51 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-52 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-53 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-54 PARTIAL RAILROAD PLAN AND PROFILE C-55 RAILROAD DETAILS C-ES-1 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-ES-2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN C-ES-3 EROSION CONTROL DETAILS LD-1 SITE LANDSCAPING PLAN LD-2 LANDSCAPING PLAN & PLANT LIST E-2 ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN Page 1 �4 5 P .0 ooZ - 9 Z. i is •COUNTY of FREDERICK Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering & Inspections 703 665-5643 FAX: 703 % 678-0682 February 27, 1992 Mr. Jay Lignell SSOE, Inc. 1001 Madison Avenue Toledo, Ohio 43624 RE: Project Harvest Hydraulic Calculations for Road and Railroad Bridges Dear Mr. Lignell: We have completed our review of the hydraulic calculations submitted for the box culverts proposed under the Park Center Drive entrance and the railroad embankment. Based on this review it appears that the proposed designs will adequately accommodate the ten (10) year and one -hundred (100) year storms. These designs have adequately addressed our remaining comments. We would appreciate copies of the revised drawings reflecting the details of the proposed designs as soon as they are available. sincerely, A-t J Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering and Inspections HES:rls cc: Evan Wyatt, Frederick County Planning and Zoning Department Ed Buchan, Hershey Foods Corporation file rp L9C�C0W171F". 9 North Loudoun St. - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Viro>inia - 22601 • 45f%r p02--`►2- ALEXANDER PROJECT HARVEST Job Conference No. 16 March 26, 1992 1. Attendance: Hershey Foods: E.Buchan, M.Lemmon, E.Boyer Hershey Pasta Group: G.Zearfoss H.B.Alexander:R.DeFiore, M.Nelson, D.Himes Shockey Brothers: G.Elliott, K.Hess, G.John Howard Shockey: A.Sizemore, B.Thomas D.K.Erectors: R.Irwin Frederick Co.: K.Fox J.J.Kirlin: D.Branson, F.Parker Cives Steel: T.Hanenburg SSOE: J.Lingnell Fischbach & Moore: J.Barbarito 2. Safety Issues• 2.01 There have been NO lost time accidents to date. 2.02 Don Himes noted D. K. Erectors & Perry's steps are not in compliance with OSHA regulations. 3. General Discussions: 3.01 To date, the project has lost 18 days due to inclement weather. 3.02 Jay Lingnell is waiting on information from Hershey Pasta Group to complete silo drawings. This is needed as soon as possible so Shockey Brothers can release these for production. • H.B.A. to receive sketches from SSOE today (3/19/92). • Shockey Brothers has received sketches from SSOE. • SSOE needs the utility requirements for the silo building from Fred Stoner. • SSOE is to provide sketch on floor drain in silo building. • Two (2) 4'x 6' openings are to be incorporated into the roof designs for the silo building above the area where the 6th silo was removed. H. B. Alexander & Son, Inc., 315 Vaughn Street, P.O. Box 1525, Harrisburg, PA 17105-1525 • (717) 234-7041 FAX 231-9000 0 • Page 2 Job Conference 16 March 26, 1992 3.03 Scott Good of J. J. Kirlin will provide H.B.A. with equipment pad layout and detail by March 16th. • Scott Good indicated it would be April 2nd before these are available. 3.04 Perry and Crider & Shockey need new site drawings showing changes due to addition of dock doors. 3.05 SSOE to provide approved submittal on flow meters & fiberglass manholes to H.B.A. today so Perry can order (3/19/92). 3.06 Kirlin's schedule on coordination drawings is delayed. They are concentrating on vestibule drawings and underground. Kirlin will have an additional person assigned to the drawings by middle of next week (3/25/92). 3.07 Kirlin is to provide H.B.A. with price to delete stainless steel floor drains. They should have to H.B.A. by 3/22/92. • Outstanding 3/26/92. 3.08 Jay Lingnell inquired if D.K.Erectors has field checked their RTU frames with the units on site to confirm that the bolting pattern lines up before rigging. Russ from D. K. indicated -they had not, but would before rigging so as to not cause any delays. 3.09 The coordination drawing meeting has been rescheduled for April 2nd at 11:00 ITEM NUMBER 4441 TWO WE'li"K IAWK AHEAD SCIINI)III,I,; H z AC•1'.IV. TY ItI';SI', March A1)r.:i 1 26 27 30 31. 1_ 2 3 6 7 <'i % Precast: Area 101 Shock BrIEr.6ction 4545 Steel: Area 10 U/G Mechanical 4862 Area 10 U/G Mecahnical Area 12 U/G Mecahnical R.T.U. Frames R.T.U. R.T.U. U/G Ductbank - -- ---- -_120 Shock Br Erection Ex avate & :lns a_I.l 20 90 Kirl.in Test & I ack. i.1.1. 90 ELc avaLe & its -all• 65 Test & Back.:_i.11 Excavate & Instial.l 4 Test & Back -Fill 1 Fa1)r..i CaL:i.on 45 D/K Del.iver'�y`�AIIU 41 iIV 14 & 15 —1��y� Buf.. Fr. g • Deliver 4,5T c y- AIIU , 6 ,) I]V14 20 D / K - 1 Ki_r l.in Rigging & Se L L:i_ng 31 _ Excavate & Install F & M / x cry H z �+ COMMENTS w On IIold for Precast Misc. Grating & Pails delivery StanL (I AIIU 7&8 3/20 11V 16 3/24 0 0 'CWU WIs1?K 1,001( AHEAD SCI1I-AM1,1i; x H u) ITEM March Apr:i.l. Pi'4 H H NUMBER ACl'1 VITY It Es 1' . GOMMENTS 264 27� 30+ 31 1 {-2 3 --6 1 7 1 S % �' 4035 Bulk Excavation Perry 1)r-j'.l..L & Shoot ]sass fond 50 Dr.-i-1-1 & Shoot l,utr.. hxp. Area 60 On IIold, Pend . Apv 41.50 San.i.tary Sewer. 1'er. r.y 2 I I iuucs w/ I,aLeri1.1 s Sill i 11 , Dra:in, t B]-dg . (West) 90 3 4130 Storm Sewer ---- Perr -- - -Y_ - ; - -.... _... _ (L - a s L )' 5.0 .... Icy 4170 Water Lines Perry WaLer.line to Pumphouse 5 1 ' -- 3 Gas Line Perry Excavate �& Place Footers 1.00 Dill -� 4240 Foundations (10) II. Shock Bacic 90 On lIold(precast) Excavgte & Place Footers 100 Loading Dock Emb. Foundations (12) 13ac-kfi11 I-Z- 70 to be delivered 4-1- 2 Excavo & Place Footers 1002 Foundations (13) 0 ---- BackF111 G x c a v--- L e & P ]. n e Footers ----- �/ 1 Foundations (14) Backfill- Stone (10) 45 On Hold r Stone (12)V--V ALEXANDER PROJECT HARVEST OPEN ITEMS March 26, 1992 RESP WHEN 4.00 Open Items (9/25/91) 4.14 Permitting/Applications 1) Apply for Environmental Permit EB 3/26/92 2) Receive Environmental Permit EB 6/1/92 (May need this permit to set boiler equipment, FS to check to see if this equipment is considered process equipment) 3) Apply for permanent telephone MC 3/31/92 14.00 Open Items (1/6/92) 14.05 Redesign R/R based on Miller's layout • Need design of unloading pit EB 4/17/92 15.00 Open Items (1/16/92) 15.13 Silo 1. Grating on intermediate floor? JL 3/30/92 2. Details of head and bottom EB 4/3/92 of silos 3. Need details of utilities (water, drainage) under JL 4/3/92 foundation 4. Utility requirements including pipe bridge EB 4/10/92 5. Shape of precast beams JL 3/30/92 6. Design LL for grating JL 3/30/92 H. B. Alexander & Son, Inc., 315 Vaughn Street, P.O. Box 1525, Harrisburg, PA 17105-1525 • (717) 234-7041 FAX 231-9000 0 Page 2 Open Items List 3/26/92 7. Dimension of grating JL 3/30/92 8. Stair embed information JL 3/30/92 9. Any additional roof loads JL 3/30/92 17.00 Open Items (1/27/92) 17.13 Stonewall water line tie-in Fred.Co. 11/1/92 17.14 Water line design from Brooke Road JL 3/25/92 to Pumphouse 18.00 Open Items (2/6/92) 18.02 Sanitary line extension (south) McIlvaine 3/27/92 • move topsoil stockpile 19.00 Open Items (2/11/92) 19.03 Response from County on partial occupancy EdS 3/20/92 • What are County requirements for partial occupancy 19.14 Permanent power installed Pot.Ed. 4/8/92 • Need closing 19.17 Location of stubs for future equip. FS 3/01/92 20.00 Open Items (3/5/92) 20.02 Concrete Sealer/Epoxy Flooring RD/JL/EB 3/17/92 Evaluation 20.03 Check out seed mix design RD/JL 3/17/92 21.00 Open Items (3/12/92) 21.02 Eliminate/relocate lines to process FS/DH 3/16/92 equipment Page 3 Open Items List 3/26/92 21.03 SSOE FI to change pipe & CB at CB29A JL 3/16/92 21.13 Coordination Drawings: • Piping/Electrical Kirlin 4/2/92 • Mechanical Kirlin 4/2/92 • Fire Protection Grinnell 4/2/92 21.15 Issue equipment pad drawings Kirlin 4/9/92 21.16 Resolve vestibule sizes on RTU's • Issue sketches of piping Kirlin 3/19/92 • Evaluate sketches JL/EB/RD 3/23/92 • Release units RD 3/25/92 • Evaluate options: * increase sizes * eliminate * removable panels * shipping in parts 22.00 Open Items (3/18/92) 22.01 Check availability and cost of copper vs. aluminum cable F&M 4/2/92 22.02 Premiums for expediting electrical equipment F&M 4/2/92 22.03 Simplex Catalog number to be supplied to F&M JL/MA 3/30/92 22.04 Underhung crane, lighting, mechanical coordination JL 4/3/92 • leave duct work where it is • put stops on crane to keep it from hitting duct • correct mounting height of lighting 22.05 Issue revised site plan showing parking at south end JL 3/30/92 22.06 Substation Shop Drawing Submittals • issue shop drawings F&M 4/6/92 • approve JL 4/16/92 E E Winchester -Frederick County Economic Development Commission 12 Rouss Avenue, Winchester, VA, 22601, (703)665-0973, FAX - (703)722-0604 MEETING SCHEDULE _ - Miller Milling Conipu.,y April 1-2, 1992 April 1, 1992 1:30 p.m. Evan Wyatt Planner II Frederick County Dept. of Planning and Development (703) 665-5651 3:00 p.m. Wendy Jones Director Frederick County Sanitation Authority (703) 665-5690 3:30 p.m. Site visit April 2, 1992 9:00 a.m. Ed Strawsnyder County Engineer Frederick Co. Dept. of Engineering and Inspections (703) 665-5643 10:30 a.m. Mike Didawick Director, General Reassment Frederick Co. Dept. of Taxation (703) 665-5680 11:30 a.m. Gene Schultz Director Virginia Employment Commission, Winchester Office (703) 722-3430 12:30 p.m. Lunch John Riley Frederick County Administrator (703) 665-5666 COME TO THE TOP - NO BETTER PLACE.... NO BETTER TIME.... 4� Ale 0 June Wilmot March 30, 1992 Winchester -Frederick County Economic Development Commission - Re: Trip to Winchester April 1/2, 1992 June AU_;. Herb Miller N iller Milling John Miller Miller lining Glen Snow Miller Wining Dave McCormik T. E. Jbberson ScbWide, Glen, Dave, and myself will be available Wednesday after 1:00 and Thursday until 3:00. John will be available on Wednesday afternoon only. Dave may stay until Friday. A odg items: - l. Building classification such as "M" or "B" 2. Building code requirements, additions or exemptions to UBC 3. Fire code requirements NFPA (sprinkler systems, pressure relief panels) ✓4. Plan submittal process for permitting. What is needed to obtain a temporary building permit ? What will be needed for the final building permit ? What are times required for plan check ? 5. Site visit b. Metered sewage 7 ✓7. Mill building height limits & Use of metal buildings. 9. Tax iss-.= concerning buixdiug materials arxd plant equipment. ✓0. Parking and WA== dents. 14 I. Loca lah�r si tmtio . 12. Permitting fees ? (amount and timing) June, this is a lists wt a complete list but a start. REQGEST FOR SITE PLAN COY -VENTS Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer Director P.O. Box 61a Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the 2nd floor o! the old Frederick Co. Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: ssnE. Inc.. JOCI Madison, Avenue, Toledo, OH 43624 419-255-3830, Attertior: ,lay Lingnell Name of development and/or description of the request: Hers,,ey Pasta Grouc New Facility Location: Ft, Collier -Industrial Park Wirchester VA 22E01 sanitation Authority Comments: 00" F. Sanitation Authority Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO SANITATION AUTHORITY * RN THIS FO TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach twa_c.yDies of your plans and/or application form. up ". 3 7 i 3 � F� � e ►mac