HomeMy WebLinkAbout007-91 Fellowship Bible Church - Back Creek District - Backfile (2)RECEIPT FF.Wk- -, • - ►Y L)_r I. yr rLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
�y �}
P.O. BOX 601, 9 COURT SQUARE
N2 023037 WINCHEITER, VIRGINIA 22601
AMOUNT DUE
/. 9'?iy.. �, �,�✓�,y DATE
$ >/,3 O, Oy g.r Cam— e - --
AMOUNT PAID
RECEIVED FROM
BALANCE DUE
yam. ADDRESS - _
THE SUM OF DOLLARS $
PAID BY � �
Q CASH TT OR r ;�✓:�17 �' v-"C..-�l. �E:�C�(�C_l r� �CL ---
CHECK tSV,(�q
OTHER
BY -- -
[,AY TIMERS RF ORDER No 3221 -- Pnn*d n USA 4
1
N-%
SITE PLAN CHECKLIST
The application is not complete if the following are not present
4 19A l 1. 1 set of comment sheets from the following agencies along
with any marked copies of the plan:
- O K 4 /20'91--/ VDOT
City of Winchester
WL ✓ Co. San. Auth. - ✓ Co. Health Dept. _CV,. 412911ell
�kj
- by-' t3«,�c�.L e/���g i Inspections Parks & Rec.
U`"' m� / �a� Fire Marshall Airport Authority
Imo. p
UU ✓ Engineer -(A
2. 1 copy of the SITE PLAN Application
3. 5 copies of the plan on a single sheet
4. 1 reproducible copy of the plan (if required)
5. a 35mm. slide of the plan (if required)
TRACKING
DATE
4-19-9 ( Application Received
Review/Invoice received from Engineer
Fee Paid (amount $ /, -350 J ) "" �`' '
Le,L�� .fSO H%
Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required)
Final Site Plan submitted with review agency, Planning
Commission, and staff comments addressed.
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/ 678-0682
June 11, 1991
Fellowship Bible Church
Attn: Mr. Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757
Winchester, VA 22601
RE: Site Plan For Fellowship Bible Church
Dear Mr. Adams:
The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved
Site Plan §007-91 of Fellowship Bible Church on June 11, 1991.
This site plan was approved to be constructed in two phases. The
first phase calls for the construction of a 4,800 foot addition to
be twenty (20) feet in height, a thirty (30) foot wide fire lane
to extend around the entire building (with the exception of the
area designated as a drainfield), and all appropriate erosion and
sediment control measures.
Phase two calls for the addition of a 9,600 square foot building
to be less than 60 feet in height, a paved parking lot complete
with ninety (90) regular parking spaces, four (4) handicapped
parking spaces, light poles and perimeter landscaping (including
shade trees and shrubs), sidewalks to extend from the northern
portion of the parking lot to the buildings, and all appropriate
erosion and sediment control measures. Phase two will require
engineers approval prior to any construction.
Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. If
I may answer any questions regarding this letter, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
FL
1
Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II
cc: Mr. Robert M. Rhodes, Back Creek Supervisor
Mr. H. Edward Stawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services
Mrs. Helen D. Hall, G.W. Clifford and Associates
THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS
9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGIN, •
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
Caller ED Time Called 3:0c) Date Called 11/21'9I
Phone No. Wa S - 5143 Time Requested 06AP Date Requested A54 P
Received By 1. Vl+,3 A. L, 'YA-TT Date of Inspection I LZI /.fI
PERMIT HOLDER NAME ELL tx,,3SHIP
13►6LC
C.HQKC.tt
RT. NO. A Lot No.
SEC. No.
SUBDIVISION
STREET NAME �'� I00LE Me,D
RE b2y
DIRECTIONS kit+- 41-
BUILDING NO.
PLUMBING NO.
14
ELECTRICAL NO.
MECHANICAL NO.
PERMIT FOR:
Type of Inspection
Residential
Footers
Slab
Water _
Sewer _
Rough Plumbing _
Groundworks _
Other:
Setbacks: FR
Draintile
Service
Rough Electric
Rough Mechanical
Gas Piping/Test
SIGN NO.
DISTRICT BAcK Crz,-i <
C,oy>rft�(Cllal C"op-c-q
BK L R
Gas Fire -up
Final Electrical
Framing
Final Mechanical
Final ✓
Site Plan
Final Building
Fire Marshall
Final Plumbing
Special/Complaint
Time In: gp- �3'�rN Temperature ���!- Cut in No.
Time Out: `t wo Weather Ra
Results: Approved rJ' Lf*�E `Z " 1---1" ejected
A i
�..
Signature - y V Date
COUNTY OF FREDERICK, Vf#*ilA
DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIONS
Caller it) u�J ref -;ram Time Called g I S o �. Date Called
Phone No. fJ. L - 6 L� Time Requested _ ^, <A- Date Requested
Received By 1 A . 0,y T— Date of Inspection
PERMIT HOLDER NAME
RT. NO. = Lot
No. SEC. No.
SUBDIVISION_
STREET NAME t DnLE I«,a
DIRECTIONS �n s, tiv
lJJ AL r lnf; , it
9 '"IK�d c Cam:
BUILDING NO.
P-. 1 4 t
PLUMBING NO.
4
AU04 llA
k/l
ELECTRICAL NO.
I)
' •'
MECHANICAL NO.
SIGN NO.
DISTRICT -�Ac
yz (E:E <
PERMIT FOR: ^ H L)C,
Cr-}
Type of Inspection
Residential
Commercial
fi,iLL14
Footers
Setbacks: FR
BK
L R
Slab
Draintile
Gas Fire -up
Final Electrical
Water _
Service
Framing
Final Mechanical
Sewer
Rough Electric
Final
Site Plan
Rough Plumbing
Rough Mechanical
Final Building
Fire Marshall
Groundworks
Gas Piping/Test
Final Plumbing
Special/Complaint
Other:
Time In: I 4q
Temperature
�r
Cut in No.
Time Out: I 09
Weather
5 l!r-J►'1 N/
Results: pproved 'fa
F L • �• 1
Rejected
Comments: fr.
l.� --
i r P vu. �s�
a,- n �
Signature (1 t ( (a Date it I
SP it— pp-7 —g
A
7M M O D r V x x C
L /✓ I / I'Z I �I 11 01 11
DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AN CUE
COUNTY OF FREDER
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601
703.665-6350
DATE
ARRIVAL
DEPARTURE
INSPECTORS NAME
I TYPE OF INSPECTION
t U kaChen/hood
M M D 0 r Y
H H M M
H Hl M M
LAST
FIRST
�1ZIyl/I
111C1
1/I/ t31G I
1 �1�'41CrG'I--ICi I I I I
L
Cry��4 1,-01
2"W.*ter/aa
3" alarm syebm
a U overtiead door
STREET NUMBER
STREET NAME
SUIT APT
SRA
6" burr g paned
7" beefing
OCCUPANT
TELEPHONE
I�ELILIL'IG�I�IyI� I� I� L
611hxrvgaeorn
9" Wit
10" plan review
MANAGEWREPRESENTATIV2 BUSINESS
TELEPHONE
'
11" use installation
12" ust leak
13" ust removal
14U ustkWdsp+
is" anrniam ir+eoeceorn
BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME
OWNERS ADDRESS
TELEPHONE
C`- <<`r�"
FIXEDPROPERTY l I I I
/"r
NUMBER OF STORIES
16" complaint
17U vataaon
CONSTRUCTION TYPE
1 U fire resistive 3 U protected non-combusubk
5 1-_J protected ordinary 7 U protected wood frame
9 1J rot CiMit ed
2 U heavy bmtter ! U unprotected ran -combustible
6 I unprotected ordinary 8 l—J unp"Mcted wood
0 U) undeMrmrned
18U fire lane 11ir1Decho
191 1 fire lane approval
20" re-nspeceon
FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT a
RE -INSPECTION DATE
MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD
UU-000U
UU-UU-UU
UUUUJ
�Uoa1er
INSPECTION GUIDELINE —CORRECTIONS REQUIRED _
The Following Conditions Need Corrections:
BUILDING
EXIT AND EGRESS
C 61 Unapproved or Detective Gas Connection
0 I Space Under Stairs Used for Storage Purposes
0 31 Inadequate Means of Egress
C 62 Damaged or Deteriorated Vent Pipe on Gas Bumrg Appliance
0 2 Broken Ceilings and V Walls — Exposed lath on Ceilings and%or Walls
0 32 Second Means of Egress Not Readily Accessible
C 63. * t Hoods. Vein Fares and%or Duct Systems Need Clemanq
IUnnaturai Openings)
0 33. Wes andar Passageways Obstructed
0 64 C"Abbks Being Stored Near Hot Warr healer
0 3 Detector and%or Unapproved Incnerala and%or Spark Arrestor Screen
034 Panic Hardware (Ant -Panic 1.21ches and BdCsl Required on Eat Doan
C. a Cardboard Ceilings arid or Walls
❑ 35 Discharge From Elul. Outside Building. Et
OROINARY HAZARDS
C 5 Fire Door Not Serviceable
036 Exdway Blocked and%or ObsMictd
0 65 Poor Hoi sekeepnq CmOioora
C 6 Fee Door Blocked or Wedged Open
❑ 37 Exit Door Locked and%or Barricaded!
❑ 66. Improper Storage
C 7 Oil Soaked Wood Floors
C 38 Exit Not Property Designated or Marked
❑ 67 Stage of Floor Ods. Clearong Comooltrds, Wales. Pokshes, Etc
C. 8 Attic Areas Open to rile Outside, Screen to Prevent Entry by Buds
C 39 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative
C 68 Stage of Etcels o. Straw, Sawdust. Burlap. Et
C 9 Doors Requiring Sent" Devices Not So Equipped
❑ d0 Illuminating Directional Signs lo Euts Required
0 69 Metal Drip Pans Required. But Not Provided
❑ % Prorndbve—Shah Be Rand
0 41 Exit Doa Swingo Against Line ttf Eat laud
❑ 70 Excessive Grease on Stove
0 11. Open and Exposed Foundation Beneadn Butdriq
042 Stairways Not Property Enclosed andor Equipped With Nor -Standard Doors 0 71 Codebft Cove On
0 12 Post Max Occupancy load
C 43 SWways Not Property aumrialed
❑ 72. Unapproved Inn Containers
❑ 11 Emergency White Lights
ELECTRICAL
C 13 Illegal and or Boot -Leg Win
FIRE PROTECTION
FIRE
❑ 45 Fire Exnngurshm Reolwed. But Not Provided
SPECIAL HAZARDS
73 Unnecessary and%or Disorderly AmtmWton of Boxes. Carters, Etc,
❑ t A inadequate Service and%or Insufficient Circuits
C 15 insufficient Receptacles
❑ 46. Fee Extinguishers Need Fkchrpnq/Inspection
Collapse—Mantan Orderly Arrarngemerif
❑ 74. Smoking in Hazardous; location, "No Smoking- Signs Noeded
016 Detector. Dewrorated or Spaced Wiring
❑ t7 Unapproved Type Fire Extnqushers
❑ 48. tee ExMlgurshers Not Property Mounted 0-60'
❑ 75 Wmmable Lauds and%or Gases Be" Improperly Used ado Stied
017 Defective and%or Broken Fixtures
018 Defective and%or Broken Swrttites and%or Sockets
❑ a9 Fie Extinguishes Not Readily Visible
❑ 76. Inadequate VenNation in Harodous Location
077 Stage of Compressed GasCytnders WdIaA Proper Anchorage IRada or
019 Circuit Breakers By -Passed or Blocked Open
050 Slandppe Hose Delenotated/Not Racked
Charon
020 Oversize Fuses and%or Cued Breakers Set bo High
ig
C 51 Fie Protection System
052 Detective Standpipe Ndates
078 0 Cylinders Being Stied and/or r n Greasy a Oily Locations
021 Pennies Behind Plug Type Fuses
053 Standppe System Disconnected
❑ 79 Oxygen� 8drg Stied Near Acetylene 1p
Acetylene CykrMes
0 22, Metal Snip of Fuse Holder Cut Back
Bridged
0 23 Fuses Jumped❑
54 Sprinkler Heads, Cut-ONs a Siamese Blocked
iCytders
Sulphur. Etc.
ed andMateriBeing Stied WAS Aces. Slrgha. Etc.
0 80 81 Unapproved �� Pam) �a�
❑ 2a Open Junction Box Fine Box
055 Inadequate Sprinkler Head CWfance 08 Inghes Requredl
056 Sprinkler Valves Not Prop" IAentfmd
0 82 Room Door �EqwpW
Loca�tonCbsrnq Device
❑ 25 Flee Panel Obstructed and%or Inaccessible 30'
❑ 83. Open Flame Heating inHazardous
❑ 26. Mots and%or Farts Dirty or Dust Cohered
HEAT114G AND COOKING
❑ 84 Vacant at Time of kspection
0 27 Unapproved Extension CordsrOrop Cats
❑ 57 Detective Heating Unit —Furnace. Gas Brier, SO". Heater Et.
0 85 Locked at Time of Inspection
❑ 28. Excessive Use of Mut%* Outten NO
❑ 58. Detective Coo" Urkl—Rarge. Hot Flat, Et
C 86 See Supplement Sheet
0 29. Lamps. Fitchres, Equipmient Et.. Not Property EInCloSed lHarrdous
0 59. Gas Meter Bbdud and%or Obstructed/Nor Protected
Locations Only)
0 60. Furnace. Bailer, Heating. Cddti g and%or Smokepge and Wort Pipe
87 W THE OPINION OF THE INSPECTOR THERE WERE NO HAZARDOUS
.0 30 Dead and Unwed Wft Shade Be Rlmnoved
Clearamas, From Combustible Maknab, Not Standard
CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION
COMMENTS
ikce- iC6QGiv
c Ctet-�td�'
—
reported on 1ht a form reflect the P WnMM es obeerved by our inspector, at the Wm of irgpitIct . Any efrory «artrnission fega2dK+q Gym solely or cotldrbona regarding *0 PreArdb^
are 1xliMnfteonal and are not deemed the fauM of the ow*
- TUBE OF INSPECTOR
RECEIVED BY
FORM ES-1--'
Ve - SPA 007-31
If
FREDERICK COUNTY
VIRGINIA
r_FPT11P1r_ATr OF USE i nr_r_"PANr_V
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE STRUCTURE LOCATED AT
Route 628 Permit Number,776-91
Fellowship Bible Church NH-8'
HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIRE-
MENTS OF THE VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING
USE GROUP A-4
FIRE GRADING
ZoAinq Admiiistrator
OCC. LOAD 300
SPECIAL COND.
ANti
13u'ildfng Official
5-B Construction
Final Approved 11-21-91
1990 BOCA Code _ _ _ ��j
FIT, 4w.
.
3 STY N;wd
REM- "4,2,06" MOWN W W
0i I
J74
0
LITHO IN U.S.A.
LAND DISTURBING PERMIT
ISSUED TO: Bev ely ( ebb/C.A.we.bb 9 Son, Inc.
who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick
County Department of Planning and Development.
This agreement, made this
AGREEMENT
30-th
day of May
19 91, by and between BeveAty Webb/ C.A. Webb 9 Son, Inc.
party(s) of the first part, and the County of Frederick, Virginia,
party of the second part.
Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the
second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for
/5 to wokk bon Fe towsh,i.p Bibf.e Chwtch pelt Donohue's Recommendation
and the party of the second part requiring the following work to
be completed during the land disturbance construction and before
final occupancy, the party(s) of the first part or his heirs/
assigns agree to do the following work:
1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation
by temporary and permanent control practices and measures
which will be implemented during all phases of clearing,
grading and construction and to provide for conformity with
the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21,
Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code
laws.
2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and
Sedimentation Control Plan.
1991
The party(s) of the first part does further agree that an agent of
Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land
disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the
approved plan.
In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto
caused its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for
and in its behalf, by RevWY. -Wo-b..E.
and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and
in its behalf.
C.A. W-b.b.-_9 San, Tnc.
Corporation
In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto
caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed,
for and in its behalf by Lanny:C,, B e, IT., PtanneA T/Zoning Inspeetan,
County of Frederick,
t�
Frederick Co my Department of
Planning liDevelopment
NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of a
site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only.
v� I
- 3 - 0
I
STATE OF VIRGINIA
COUNTY OF FREDERICK
I, Debi D. Swim.PPU , a Notary Public in and for
the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day
personally appeared before me in my said County,
BeveAttf Webb
of C. A. Webb 9 Son Inc
and LannyVC . B,, 6 e, II , PtanneA I /Zon, nq I vas pee ton
of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development,
whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated
30. 1991
appear before me and acknowledged the same.
Given under my hand this
19 91 _
My Commission expires on
30th. day of
MaU
did personally
_ L l- Q Qt
Notary Public
Seatemben 30. 1993
APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST
Your site plan should include the following:
Administrative Information
Y N
✓ _ 1. Name of proposed development
_ 2. Name and address of owner
3. Name and address of developer
4. Name, address, and phone number of designer
_ 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect
6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions
A 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a
result of a conditional use permit or conditional
zoning approval
8. A space labeled "approved by the Zoning
Administrator" for the approval signature and date
of approval
General Site Information
Y N
9. Location map (scale 1:2000)
✓ _ 10. Magisterial District of site
✓ _ 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50)
12. North Arrow
✓ _ 13. Zoning of site
14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties
Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures
Y N
15.
Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels
16.
Acreage of all lots included in the plan
_
17.
The location and dimensions of all required setbacks
and yard areas
18.
Location of all buildings, structures, and uses
19.
The proposed use of each building, structure, and
area
LA
20.
The location and type of all dwelling units
�h
21.
Ground floor area and total floor area of all
buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and
industrial zoning districts
22.
The height of all buildings and structures
✓
_
23.
The location and dimension of all signs
7
Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures (con't)
Y N
24.
Location
of
outdoor lighting fixtures
25.
Location
and
nature of outdoor storage areas
_ 0A
26.
Location
and
area of common open space
A
27.
Location
and
description of all recreation facilities
28.
Location
of
sidewalks and pedestrian ways
✓
29.
Location
of
outdoor trash receptacles
Roads
Y N
_ 30. Name and number of existing and planned streets on
and adjoining the site
31. Location of existing and planned streets on and
a� adjoining the site
�A 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and
construction of planned roads
33. Location and dimensions of all proposed
entrances from public right-of-ways
Utilities
Y N
-WA 34. Location of all utilities, includina sewer and water
✓
lines with the size
of lines, mains, and
laterals
35.
Location and width
of all easements,
including
access, utility and
drainage easements
✓ 36.
Location and nature
of fire lanes, fire
hydrants,
I�Ao,
and all other facilities
Code requirements
necessary to meet the Fire
Parking
Y N
/
✓_ _
37. Calculations describing the required number of
parking and loading spaces
38. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading
/
spaces, driveways, parking
other features to be used
aisles, curbing, and
�/ —
39. Location
and dimension of all
handicapped spaces
111
4
IC
Natural Features
Y N
40. Existing and finished contour lines
41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains,
wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental
features
✓ 42. Location of streams and drainage ways
Landscaping
Y N
_ ✓ 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of
—/ plants to be used
_ _✓ 44. Location of required buffers and screening with cross
sections or profiles
Erosion and Sediment Control
Y N
Pi
45. A stormwater management plan with run off
calculations and location and description of
�� ✓ — facilities to be used
46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with
location, types, and examples of provisions to be
used
9
0
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
SITE PLAN APPLICATION
County of Frederick, Virginia
Prepared for
Fellowship Bible Church
c/o Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757
Winchester, Va 22601
May 1991
by
gilbert w. clifford & associates, inc.
FREDERICKSBURG - WINCHESTER
0
0
Site Plan Application
DATE: 22 May 1991 Application #:
Complete the following application:
1. Development's Name: FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
2. Location of Property: East corner of Intersection between
Va. Rte. 652 & Va. Rte.628
3. Property Owner's Name: FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Address: c/o Harry Adams P.O. Box 2757
Winchester, Va 22601
Telephone: (703) 662-7743
4. Applicant:
Address:
Telephone:
Agent: Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates,Inc.
Address: 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va
Telephone:_ (703) 667-2139
5. Designer/Design Co.: same
Address:
Telephone:
Contact: Tom Price
6. Is this an original or revised Site Plan?
Original X Revised
7. Total Area of Parcel to be developed: 3.50 Acres +
8. Property Information:
a) Tax Map Number:
b) Parcel Number:
•
•
c) Tax ID$: 63000-A00-0000-0000-00140
d) Current Zoning: RA
e) Present Use: Church
f) Proposed Uses: Church Addition
g) Adjoining Property Zoning: RA
h) Adjoining Property Use: Residential & Vacant
i) Magisterial District:_ j.-ACV:, Cet-t'<
I have read the material included in this package and understand
what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I
also understand that all required material will be complete prior
to the submission of my site pl
g
Applicant's Signature:
LJ
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Virginia Department of Transportation
ATTN: William H. Bushman, Resident Engineer
P.O. Box 278, Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0278
(703) 984-4133
PECE.e` )
EDE',"o Ui-iG !,:_. _ .-;vCY
Apo 1 "i
e
(1 E3 7 , 0 DEL ❑ KOW
The local office of the Transportation Department is located at
1550 Commerce Street, if you prefer to hand deliver this review
form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH /o Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757 Winchester. Va 22601
Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. P.O. Box 2104
Winchester Va 22601 Attn:.-Tom Price (703) 667-2139
Name of development and/or decription of the request:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Location: East corner of Intersection between Va Rte.652
& Va. Rte.628
Transportation Department Comments:
No objection to site plan. Present entrance is adequate for proped use.
However, should use of the property change or expand in the future
the entrance may need to be upgraded.
VDOT Sign ture and Date:
e - Z �/
(NOTICE TO VDOT - PLEASE RETURN THIS F 0 THE AGENT.)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attache THREE copies of your plans and/or application form.
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Frederick County Sanitation Authority
ATTN: Wellington Jones, Engineer/Director
P.O. Box 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5690
The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second
floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you
prefer to hand deliver this review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH c/o Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757 Winchester, Va 22601
Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. P.O. Box 2104
Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139
Name of development and/or decription of the request:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Location: East corner_ of Intersection between Va. Rte.652
& Va. Rte.628
Sanitation Authority Comments:
Wz--*- po IY07- TX15 4,MZA
Sanit. Signature & Date:
(NOTICE TO SANITATION L
NOTICE
It is your responsibility to
possible in order to assist
please attach TWO copies of
E RETURN THIS FORM T,
TO APPLICANT
complete this form as accurately as
the agency with their review. Also,
your plans and/or application form.
RLO U
s,� ` APR 1 9 1991
•
n
U
BOCA Review Sheet
Permit 0000776 - 91
Rnra Review Sheet
Wood frame construction
USE GROUP 5-9 construction, combustible unprotected
Tabular area: 7,200 sq it
Actual area: 11,600 sq it
Perimeter iacrease: To get a perimeter increase a min. of 25 percent
of total perimeter must be open. Total perimeter of this structure is
642 it and at this time 120 it is open which is 18.7 percent. A min.
of 62 percent open perimeter is needed to build this addition under
S-B construction. This can be accomplished with a fire lane.
Note: Open perimeter shall he on the same lot or dedicated for public
use, and shall not be less than 30 It in width accessible from a
street by a posted fire lane not less than 18 it in width: Fire lane
surface is the discretion of the fire marshal.
A/E seal on drawings: A licensed architect or porfessional engineer's
seal is required on drawings.
This is not an electrical, mechanical, or plumbing review
If during the course of construction, any deletion of Code re-
quirements are discovered, even if not commented on here, they will be
immediately corrected on the plans and incorporated into the con-
struction underway all prior to receiving an occupancy permit.
Ok for tooter foundation at this time. Owner assumes all responsi-
bility for fire 'Lana being installed.
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Frederick County Inspections Department
ATTN: Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director
P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5651
The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court
Squard in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review
form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH c/o Harry Adams
Name of development and/or decription of the request:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Location: East corner of Intersection between Va. Rte.652
& Va. Rte.628
Inspections Department Comments:
r S Jr i9 " �, 't -Fo r S r 1, JI& riI /J J'Illly C7 cl c
C' c3 /liir? 4 0 :��� � NO ( 4L i i��i ��3 c6 e % �cN g1! lr r w
Inspect. Signature & Date : �. ,���_„,r Al- / 7_ 7 0
(NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS - PLEASE RETURN THIS/FORM TO AGENT.:)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
��^
OF FREDERICK, VIRGINI*���
~~FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE ��
LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS
Control No. 042291359 Date Received 041691 Date Reviewed 042291
Applicant Name G. W. Clifford & Assoc.
Address P. O. Box 2104
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Project Name Fellowship Bible Church
Phone No. 703-667-2139
Type of Application
1st Due Fire Co. 11
Election District
Site Plan
Back Creek
Current Zoning
1st Due Rescue Co. 11
RECOMMENDATIONS
Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System
Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other
RA
Emergency Vehicle Access;
Adequate Inadequate X Not Identified
Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No
Comments: A fire lane is needed along the south side of the structure
to give fire dept. access to one of the proposed additions.
Roadway/Aislewav Widths:
Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified
Special Hazards Noted; Yes X No
Comments: There is no municipal water to this site. Making ready access
to all portions of the structure is of critical importance to ensure
��........�'
firefighter safety.
•
•
REQUEBT FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
a, ,T
J Fredderick-Winchester Health Department
ATTN:' Herbert L. Sluder, Sanitation Engineer
-•----=-P":O. Box 2056, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 667-9747
The Frederick -Winchester Health Department is located at the
intersection of Smithfield Avenue and Brick Kiln Road, if you
prefer to hand deliver this review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH /o Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757 Winchester, Va 22601
Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC P.O. Box 2104
Winchester. Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-21 9
Name of development and/or decription of the request:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Location: East corner of Intersection between Va Rte 652
& Va. Rte.628
Health Department Comments:
,,/
AIJELur Wn?,L SZ4-r,A)U_ ���� N67 1ekC64.d AIC Ctt2lfui0 <
F;, (I y r-h c H -3) RGL,') ! ! `DESr(-iUF J /-tlS6' Pf K1'
l �r t1 G bE l �? Freo n, �k ; ,/�/� �Ah/�S ��RlCc, Ln 71) �}IFT7E,)
ea th Signature and Date: -
(NOTICE TO HEALTH DEPT. - PLEASE RETUtN THIS FQJRM TO AGENT.)
NOTICE TQ APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
Sa F Fc�
US -
��t-tecJ LP O jz--4 U�w d -
2J .4 Zo& q 2.t)6
COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA
LORD FAIRFAX SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
2045-B Valley Avenue
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 662-3312
G. W. Clifford & Associates
P.O. Box 2104
Winchester, VA 22601
Tom Price
Enclosed please find our response to the Request for Site Plan
Comment sheet. On May 9, 1991, Frank Sherwood, District Director
representing Frederick County, and I examined the site.
The Soil and Water Conservation District feel that the plan
appears to address all erosion and sediment areas of concern.
consideration of our comments.
Sincerely,
ia A. Hepner, Sr.
Conservation Specialist
Lord Fairfax SWCD
David Weiss, Chm., E & S Control Committee, LFSWCD
John Penney, Director, Frederick Co., LFSWCD
Frank Sherwood, Director, Frederick Co., LFSWCD
Enclosure
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Lord Fairfax Soil & Water Conservation District
2045-B Valley Avenue
Winchester, Va 22601
(703)662-3312
The Soil & Conservation Office is located at 2045-B Valley Ave,
Winchester, Va, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH c/o Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757 Winchester, Va 22601
Agent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. P.O. B_ox 2104
Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139
Name of development and/or decription of the request:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Location: East corner of Intersection between Va Rte 652
& Va. Rte.628
Soil & water Conservation Comments:
Plan appears to address all E & S areas of concern.
Sanit. Signature & Date: U C
(NOTICE TO SANITATION - EASE RET J T S FORM 0 AGENT:)
I E TQ APPLI ANT
It is your responsibili y to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application form.
D
APR 1819�
REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS
Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department
ATTN: James Doran, Director
P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601
(703) 665-5678
The Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department is located on
the second floor of the Frederick County Administration Building,
9 Court Square, Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this
review form.
Applicant's name, address and phone number:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH c/o Harry Adams
P.O. Box 2757 Winchester, Va 22601
Aaent: G.W. CLIFFORD & ASSOC. P.O. Box 2104
Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Tom Price (703) 667-2139
Name of development and/or decription of the request:
FELLOWSHIP BIBLE CHURCH
Location: East corner of Intersection between Va. Rte.652
& Va. Rte.628
Parks & Recreation Department Comments:
d ).,
,� / -'-'C- /// i
Parks Signature and Date:
(NOTICE TO PARKS - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE AGENT.)
NOTICE TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form.
��' APR 191991 D
i
'.'4'
•
•
April 19, 1991
Mr. Ed Strawsnyder
Director of Engineering
Frederick County
9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA. 22601
Re: Fellowship Bible Church
17555.131
Dear Ed:
1 L
AK,
S( I
As requested, I have reviewed the above site plan. My comments are summarized
as follows:
A. ACCESS
1. The proposed plan is the first phase of a two -phased addition to the
existing site. No additional site access points to Rte. 628 are
proposed. The existing access appears adequate for both the first
and second phases. Traffic counts along Rte. 628 would be necessary
to assess if turn lanes would be warranted from the road.
B. GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL
1. I see no apparent problem with the proposed grading for this first
phase. In fact, I do not see a problem with the grading as proposed
for the second phase. For the purposes of construction and insuring
proper grading, spot elevations are needed in the second phase
building corners, entrances, parking lot corners, and changes in
grade.
2. Based on my observation of the grading plan, this site sits in the
path of drainage coming from the northwest crossing Rte. 37,
Rte. 628, and Rte. 652. The majority of the thru drainage is
diverted to the south of the building site. In the large scheme of
things this first addition has very little impact to increase runoff
from the site. On a similar perspective, the second phase does not
have much impact. However, to the property immediately downstream,
this increase will be more noticeable in that more runoff will reach
■ 11240 9hples Mill Kxd, Suite 100, Fairfax, Virginia 22030 ■ 703.385.3566 ■ Rix 703.385.8319
APR 2 3 1991
them quicker. There is no problem in postponing any stormwater
management until the final phase (phase 2) of this improvement plan.
I do recommend that stormwater management be required at that time.
3. The soils in this area are categorized in the Type C hydrologic
group. Therefore, a higher degree of runoff will occur. For this
reason, I do not concur with the runoff coefficients of 0.2 or 0.25
for the calculations. As an offset, the designer has used a time of
concentration that appears shorter for a 100-acre drainage area than
I would normally expect unless the slopes are great, channels
well-defined and travel distance relatively short, which may well be
the case here. This should be verified. In any event, I feel that
the runoff rates may be significantly underestimated. This has very
little significance in this particular plan other than it could
indicate a lesser degree of impact from this development on the
downstream properties. It would also indicate that L-he existing pond
is less adequate as a stormwater management facility even though it
is indicated inadequate as presented.
C. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS
1. Assuming that both phases are not to be constructed at this time, I
would suggest a silt fence to the south of the construction entrance
just outside the construction road to the phase 1 building. This
would catch most of the silt prior to the check dam as indicated.
2. Inlet protection should be provided around the courtyard inlet and
the culvert under the future parking lot for phase 2 if the phase 2
grading and culvert occur during this first construction phase.
Based on my review and comments, I can recommend approval of the first phase
building improvements with the E&S modifications. It is my opinion that the
second phase should incorporate stormwater management provisions in accordance
with the current State and County requirements. If this site is not required
to do so, then why would we require the adjacent properties to do so in the
future?
If you have any question or do not agree, please let me know.
Sincerely,
4au
UE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
A. Aern�ardP.E.
Project Manager
cc: Tom Price - Gilbert Clifford & Associates
R/F/AJO
• 11240 Waples Mill Road
I N°IN`'` RS Suite 100
ARCHITECTS Fairfax, Virginia 22030
SCIFNJISTS 703.385.3566
Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering
Frederick County Planning Department
9 Court Square, Box 601
Winchwster, VA 22601
Your Authorization: Signed Agreement
Fellowship Bible Church
Site Plan review
Date: Apr. 19, 1991
Please Reference:
Project No. 17555. 131
Invoice No. 9102704
Client No. 07534
Project Manager
1.0
hrs
@33.25
33.25
Senior Engineer
2.0
hrs
@33.25
66.50
Admin. Assist.
0.5
hrs
@14.50
7.25
Totla Direct
Total Indirect
TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE
107.00
160. 0
$267.50
•
•
G. W. CLIFFORD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
MEMORANDUM
200 North Cameron Street
P.O. Box 2104
Winchester, Virginia 22601
703-667-2139
Fax: 703-665-0493
To: Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator
Frederick County Planning and Development
From: Helen Hall
Re: Erosion and Sediment Control Study
Fellowship Church
Date: 16 April 1991
Project Description -
The purpose of this project is the construction of two additions to the
existing church building of Fellowship Bible Church. The site of 13.3 acres is
located at the intersection of Va. Secondary Routes 628 and 652 approximately 0.6
miles southwest of the Winchester City Limits in Back Creek Magisterial District,
Frederick County, Virginia. In addition to the building addition construction,
grading will be done for a future building addition and parking lots. A total of
approximately 1.6 acres will be disturbed during construction.
Existing Site Conditions -
The proposed site is an area of rolling hills formerly in agricultural
production. The site is covered by a natural growth of grass which is kept mown.
The site drains from west to east towards the southeasterly corner of the site with
existing slopes ranging from 2% to 4%.
Adjacent Property -
All adjoining properties are in use as residential areas except the
easterly property which also functions as a landscape nursery.
Soils -
The site is in the Frederick-Poplimento-Oaklet Soil Association. The
area is characterized by gently sloping to steep, very deep, well drained soils that
have a fine textured subsoil, formed in material weathered from limestone.
For purposes of design runoff conditions, antecedent moisture condition II
(normal consideration for the mid -Atlantic region) is assumed. Soils are of the
Swimley (39B), Frederick (14B/16B), and Pagebrook (35) series. These soils have
a moderate rate of water transmission, therefore SCS Soil group "C" is adopted. A
copy of the soils map is enclosed as attachment #1.
Stormwater Management -
The rational method was used to determine peak flows from the site for
the two, ten, and one hundred year storms. A small pond exists immediately
downstream of the site. The two, ten and 100 year storms were routed through the
pond to ensure the added impervious area would not adversely affect the pond
structure. A summary of the pre and post development drainage values are
attachment #2.
The entire site drains to the south and east and to the existing pond,
which lies just off site. As the pre development area to the pond is approximately
120 acres, and the developed area is less than 1.6 acres, the General Condition 7
clause addressing developments of an area less that 1 percent of the upstream
watershed is just about met. The developed area is actually 1.33% of the total
area draining to the pond. We have, however, checked the effect of development
on the pond.
A capacity analysis of the existing pond was completed for the two, ten
and hundred year storms. The pond covers approximately three quarters of an acre.
It has an emergency spillway set at the 782.5 elevation. The normal pond water
elevation, for purposes of the study, was 781.43. Two 8" CMP pipes normally drain
the pond. The watershed which drains to the pond is 120 acres. This area extends
to the west, across Rte. 628, to the west of Rte. 37. A c factor of .25 and time of
concentration of 15 minutes was used for the pre development flows. The pre
development peak two year flow to the pond was estimated at 102 cfs, the ten year
flow is 137. cfs. Hydrograph routings of each of these storms through the pond are
attached.
The c factor for the 13 acre developed site was weighted to account for
the increased runoff to the pond in post development. The weighted c value is .26.
As the longest time of concentration governs; 15 minutes was used in post
development also. The peak post development two year storm flow is 104 cfs. The
ten year peak flow is 141 cfs and the 100 year peak flow is 202 cfs. The peak post
development storm routing for the two, ten and 100 year storms are attached.
The two year storm in pre and post conditions, inundates the pond. The
difference in elevation over the weir from pre to post is .03 ft. The increase in pond
elevation for the ten and 100 year storms is of the same magnitude. In the existing
conditions, most significant storms will cause the pond to overflow. This will
continue in post development. The small increases in runoff will have no negative
effect on the pond.
• 0
Sediment and Erosion Control -
In order to ensure the quality of runoff does not decrease during
construction, we have provided for silt fencing, straw bale barriers, rock fill check
dams, and a construction entrance to minimize erosion. Unless otherwise indicated,
all vegetation and structural erosion and sediment control practices will be
constructed and maintained according to the most current minimum standards and
specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. The
erosion control measures are specified on the plans.
Maintenance -
All soil erosion control structures shall be checked weekly by the
contractor during this construction period and after construction is completed until
grass cover is established. Sediment retained by these structures shall be
continuously removed and placed in an area of the site specified, damage to soil
erosion control structures shall immediately be repaired when identified by the
contractor. The contractor shall cooperate with all agents of the County, the
Engineer and others who may identify needed facilities or work in order to protect
the environment within the subject of this report.
0
X.5 INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS
Installation of an erosion and sediment control plan will be discussed in
seven distinct steps, primarily from the standpoint of the job superintendent.
The steps are:
1. study of the plan and site to organize implementation
2. pre -construction conference between the job superintendent and inspector
3. site preparation
4. inspection and maintenance
5. grading and utilities installation
6. building construction
7. permanent stabilization
Study of the plan and site
The job superintendent must be thoroughly familiar with both the
erosion and sediment control plan and the construction site. He should note
all of the critical areas indicated on the plan and then actually identify
their location and extent on the ground. These should include stream
channels and associated flood plain areas, drainageways and outlets into
streams, points where land -disturbing activities are adjacent to or must cross
streams and drainageways, steep slopes and highly erodible soils, and
runoff entering the site from adjacent areas. He should note what practices
are specified to protect these areas. Also, he should be aware of critical
areas not specifically treated in the plan. He should discuss these with the
inspector at the pre -construction conference.
Next, he should determine the locations of all control measures and
determine their "fit" on the land. He should note any needed adjustments
and plan to discuss these at the pre -construction conference.
He should check the schedule for the installation of erosion and
sediment control practices, the schedule for all earth -disturbing activities,
and the relationship between the sequence and timing of practice
installation and the earth -disturbing activities. The timing and sequence of
installation are important elements of an erosion and sediment control plan.
The site must be ready for rain before the earth -disturbing activities are
started. For this reason, certain practices must be in place and ready to
provide protection before both areas are exposed. The staging of major
earth -disturbing activities in order to limit the size of bare area exposed at
any time is another important element of the plan which should be noted.
The pre -construction conference
The next step is a pre -construction conference and site review with the
erosion and sediment control inspector. The site review will help both
parties in meeting their responsibilities. It should be called for by the job
superintendent and should be help on the construction site. All aspects of
the plan should be discussed to ensure that the job superintendent and the
inspector are in agreement in interpreting the plan, scheduling, procedures,
and practices which are to be used. They should agree particularly on the
critical problem areas and on the perimeter practices specified to prevent
damage to adjacent properties.
The location of all measures should be carefully considered. If study of
the plan indicates that adjustments in location are needed, these should be
discussed with the inspector. The inspector may authorize minor
adjustments, such as moving a diversion from a property line to a grading
limit, or shifting an outlet to match a natural depression in the land. Major
adjustments may require formal revision of the plan and should be approved
by the plan -approving authority.
The sequence of installation of practices and land -disturbing activities
should also be discussed. The guidelines for erosion and sediment control
planning require that debris basins and other appropriate erosion and
sediment control measures be installed prior to, or as a first phase of, land
grading. Other appropriate measures include construction entrances,
diversion dikes, interceptor dikes, perimeter dikes, gravel outlet structures,
lever spreaders, waterways or outlets, and grade stabilization structures.
The inspector must be firm about establishment of these practices before
grading begins.
The State minimum "General Criteria" should be checked to be sure that
they will be satisfied during construction. Authorized variances should be
noted, and it should be determined if any additional conservation measures
or variances are needed. Remember that variances to the "General
Criteria" must be documented.
Site preparation
One of the first steps in preparing the site is to lay out all traffic
circulation routes and storage areas. Route locations should be chosen so as
to pose the least treat to the critical areas which have been identified.
Well vegetated areas should be damaged as little as possible. Soil
stockpiles should be located a safe distance from waterways and streams.
Barriers may be required to keep traffic within the delineated areas, or at
least out of the critical areas. If needed, they should be installed before
opening the site to general construction traffic.
Required sediment trapping practices should be installed. (Note that
compacting, seeding, and mulching are required to stabilize these practices.)
Next, waterways and outlets should be installed with the vegetation or
lining material call for in the plan.
The work force should be instructed about the location of critical areas
and sediment control practices and the need to protect these areas from
damage.
Inspection and maintenance of erosion control measures
Maintenance differs from the other erosion and sediment control
activities. It must begin as soon as the first practice is installed and must
continue through tall the succeeding activities until the permanent erosion
control measures are established and functioning. The features of a
maintenance program are described in the narrative part of the plan. All
structural measures should be checked at the close of each work day and,
particularly, at the end of the work week. Also, they should be checked
before and after each rainstorm. Diversion berms should be checked to see
that they have not been breached by equipment. The condition of level
spreader areas, waterways, and other outlets should also be checked.
Traffic should be moving within the established access routes. Channels
should be checked for sediment deposits or other impeding material.
Repairs should be made promptly when damages are discovered. When
repairing waterways or other channels, the new lining material should be
at least as erosion resistant as the original material. Vegetative practices
and vegetative cover on structural practices require maintenance fertilizer
and, perhaps, mowing.
All sediment traps should be cleaned out after each storm. Sediment
basins should be cleaned out when the deposited material reaches the level
designated in the plan or standards and specifications.
Grading and utility construction
The fifth major step is the grading and utility installation. If
stockpiling of fill or topsoil is planned, a pre -selected, relatively safe
stockpile area should be used. To minimize erosion, the slopes of the
stockpile should be flattened at the end of each working period. The
stockpile should be mulched and seeded as soon as it is completed.
0 i
Disturbed areas which can be brought to final grade at this stage during
a satisfactory season for seeding should be seeded, sodded, or otherwise
stabilized with the permanent material and techniques indicated in the
plan. If they cannot be seeded, they should be stabilized with anchored
mulch. Areas which are to remain at rough grade for more than 30-days
before permanent stabilization should be mulched and seeded to temporary
cover immediately following rough grading.
Utilities such as storm sewers, sanitary sewers, electrical conduits, water
mains, and gas mains, and gas mains are usually installed at this time. To
minimize the amount of area disturbed, the work should be organized and
the trenches sized to take several utilities in one trench. The installation
should be carefully coordinated to reduce the time that the trenches must
stay open. Excavated materials should be placed on the side of the trench
away from streams and drainageways. If sediment -laden water must be
pumped from utility trenches, it should be conveyed safely to a sediment
trap or basin. Trenches should be filled, compacted, mulched, and seeded to
temporary or permanent vegetation within seven days.
As soon as the storm sewers are installed, inlet sediment traps should be
installed to prevent sediment from entering the system. If called for, storm
drain outlet protection should be installed.
Building construction
The sixth major step or stage is building construction. Two major hazards
are common during this step. Additional equipment and work force bring
adcled risks to areas which should be protected. Efforts to control traffic
must be increased during this period. All types of traffic should be made to
stay on the established travel routes.
The second major hazard is from the excavated material. This phase
usually results in high volumes of soil for disposal and stockpiling.
Stockpiles should be located where they will not wash into drainageways
or onto previously stabilized areas. The slopes on these areas should be
flattened, and they should be protected by anchored mulch and a temporary
seeding. Excavations should be backfilled as soon as possible, an
appropriate surface protection should be provided.
Permanent stabilization
The seventh and last step is permanent stabilization. As mentioned
earlier, this need not and should not be delayed until the entire
development is completed. A significant reduction in erosion damage repair
costs and regrading costs can be made if smaller areas are stabilized with
permanent vegetation as soon as they are ready, unless the season is
unsuitable for seeding. If unsuitable, then all areas should be mulched.
Most sediment basins, dikes, sediment traps, and other control structures
are to be removed, regraded, mulched, and seeded before leaving the site.
However, the inspector should be consulted before removing them. They
should not be removed until the surrounding area is stabilized and they are
no longer needed.
In some cases, sediment basins, diversions, and waterways are to remain
as part of the permanent runoff management system. In such cases, sediment
basins should be cleaned out and seeded to suitable permanent vegetation.
Diversions and waterways should be checked, repaired if needed, and left
in good condition. The inspector will check on the final condition of
measures which are to be retained.
When final grading is completed, all bare areas should be stabilized
with permanent vegetation within seven days. The standards and
specifications for permanent vegetative practices in the State Handbook
give information on various materials and methods for permanent
stabilization.
X.6 INSPECTION OR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
The inspector will need to coordinate his work with the activities
previously described for the job superintendent. He will need to study the
plan ahead of time, participate in the pre -construction conference, and
explain plan requirements if an explanation is needed. He should note the
construction schedule and plan his own schedule accordingly. He will
inspect the site frequently through each stage, but should particularly
check to see that all structural measures called for are installed during site
preparation. A careful inspection is called for at the end of each stage in
phased developments. Utility construction may be particularly damaging
to control practices. Repairs should be made immediately.
The inspector should develop and use a standard inspection form to
assure a proper record of each inspection. Careful documentation of
inspections is especially important if enforcement actions become necessary.
The inspection form should provide space to identify the project, its
location, permit number, and date. Space should be provided to record the
phase at time of inspection, and whether all practices called for at that
phase have been installed. Space should also be provided to indicate if
structural practices meet design requirements and to indicate the condition of
all practices. The beginning of grading, utility construction, and other
planned items should be noted and dated. If the plan is not being followed,
the inspector should record what action is being taken to correct it. (The
Commission has developed an inspection log form as part of the Field
Manual.)
The inspector will find it helpful to use a standard checklist when
performing inspections. The Commission has developed such a checklist as
part of the Field Manual (pp. A-11 and A-12). Most of the items on that
checklist refer to a specific General Criterion. The items from the checklist
are listed below:
1. Are all structural practices called for on the plan installed in the proper
location and in accordance with State minimum specifications:
2. Are there any denuded areas which require temporary or permanent
stabilization? (GC-1)
3. Do any seeded areas require maintenance fertilization, seeding or
mulching? (GC-2)
4. Is there any evidence that sediment is leaving the site and damaging
adjacent property? (GC-3)
5. Are perimeter sediment trapping measures in place and earthen
structures seeded and mulched? (GC-4)
6. Are all cut and fill slopes adequately stabilized? (GC-6)
7. Is there any evidence of increased off -site erosion since the project began?
(GC-7)
8. Are all on -site drainage channels and outlets adequately stabilized?
(GC-8)
9. Are all operational storm sewer inlets protected so that sediment will
not enter the system? (GC-9)
10. Is there any work going on in live streams that may require stabilization
or a temporary stream crossing? (GC-10)
11. Are utility trenches being backfilled, seeded and dewatered properly?
(GC-11)
12. Is there any structural practices that should be removed because they are
no longer needed? (GC-12)
• 0
13. Are there any structural practices that should be removed because they
are no longer needed? (GC-13)
14. Do any structural practices require repair or clean -out to maintain
adequate function? (GC-14)
If violations of a plan or potentially hazardous situations are noted,
they should be reported to the job superintendent. The inspector may be able
to suggest economical ways to achieve desirable corrections. In any case, it is
wise to set a reasonable deadline for accomplishing necessary corrections.
Cases of non-compliance (such as commencing land disturbance without an
approved plan) should be reported to the local program administrator. If
enforcement action is ever necessary, it should be taken promptly and
firmly.
X.7 SCHEDULING AND TIMING
Scheduling and timing are extremely important aspects of the erosion
and sediment control efforts with superintendent and the inspector must be
concerned. Certain practices must be in place before general grading begins.
Utility trenches should remain open for as short a time as possible. This
means close coordination of the installation of the various utilities.
Immediately upon completing installations, trenches should be filled,
compacted, mulched, and seeded. Temporary sediment traps should be
installed to protect storm sewer inlets immediately after sewer installation.
Mulching and seeding should quickly follow grading. Attention to the
timing of stabilization can greatly reduce the risk of costly repairs and
clean-ups.
To make sure that conservation practice implementation is timely and
well coordinated with construction activities, some method of work
scheduling is needed. Failures can be very costly. They can often be
prevented by foresight and scheduling. One method of work scheduling is
the flow chart. The flow chart has good display value for the
superintendent, contractor, and foremen of various crews. It should be
flexible and may need to be revised as construction proceeds. For effective
erosion and sediment control, construction should be scheduled to eliminate
unnecessary exposure of bare soil.
X. 8 FINAL WORD
It is common knowledge to anyone with just limited experience with
erosion and sediment control that even the best control plans sometimes
result in implementation problems. Keep in mind the disparate goals of the
job superintendent and the inspector:
1. The job superintnedent's main goal is to complete the project on time
within the project budget.
2. The inspector's main goal is to see that the construction plans and
regulations are followed and the public is protected from unreasonable
damage and danger.
The common thread in each of these viewpoints is the need to reach
timely solutions to problems that come up. By developing a cooperative
working relationship and exercising common sense, the contractor and
inspector can work together to solve problems efficiently and economically.
Selection of Plant Materials for
The Northern Piedmont/Mountain Region
PERMANENT SEEDING FOR HIGH MAINTENANCE AREAS:
Spring --March 15 - April 15 Kentucky bluegrass
Red fescue
Tall fescue
Summer —May 1- August 1 'Tall fescue
Bermudagrass
(winter -hardy sod)
Fall --August 15 - September 15 Kentucky bluegrass
Winter ---see SELECTION OF PLANTS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING
PERMANENT SEEDING FOR LOWER MAINTENANCE AREAS:
Spring ---March 15 - April 15 Tall fescue
Redtop
Weeping lovegrass
Reed canarygrass
Red fescue
Kentucky bluegrass
Sericea lespedeza
Summer --May 1 - August 1 Tall fescue
Weeping lovegrass
Sericea lespedeza
Fall ---August 15 - September 15 Tall fescue
Redtop
Red fescue
Kentucky bluegrass
Crown vescue
Reed canarygrass
Winter --see SELECTION OF PLANTS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING
TEMPORARY SEEDING:
Spring --March 1 - April 30
Rye
Oats
Italian ryegrass
Korean (annual)
lespedeza (may be used for
1/2 seeding rate of any of the
above)
Summer —May 1- August 14
Millet
Weeping lovegrass
Korean (annual)
lespedeza
Fall --August 15 - November 1
Rye
Italian ryegrass
Crimson clover
Winter ---prepare seedbed,
mulch in acceptable manner, and
seed at first available opportunity in spring.
•
•
Attachment #1
Soils Map
,fir. �, '�� d���'?` �7 -•�,�N. " �`�� ;�'' ; ;,. 1.
',l, - J.}; 4 I } Ilil����%�/J�PjPjjPj�� � i / - � 1 .1• � 4 {' '�r �' i. � b•
jV
#..y�� ��,.+,r '-its i• t- Z {,. ,��1 tlw�'i^ ® A, A•CA
,. ,1 �/ �:r� � Mkt, 1 ,r,* �. � •.,^:'' r v
�. !•:`.+ iq�`,r>I►? '7� f C.A. p �•,r• _'
,,� .f. I •, a� w. ���r%ti/tl irly i a .f � f✓ ` 4�'r.::..'�'• SS` bit=L+v� r� �1.�.�e •i` _ •�'r .
%e, '•�iP !�; ��. � `^1„ .. r �. t�' .�lr � Icy - i
c o r Y s, ft �� = i• Y �� J
rr t -10
FA
MI
in
PO
{ ` J• af, �'T t a tr f r
�•� ���^' J'.�*ti Y j��• � �.•r'`� ter` •'; �.
�
' s Ar...� �;h� 4r t�� r `�• 1i S' � •a1�i""5,�,,j .A: s.
� J � XS i t'V 'f'7
RE
•-,r1.:J j��'.4 t :'�'-t 1�.,,. 1' � .,/i... „A ,�t.•)`ra-'Y r'1 i.
41,
ice• �•:�c,. ►_'p :.�. ' �. i.
�' +� • •► 3 /
<l "^F�,'y�at�'• :�,1`� ��'-;1* � � " a r'�,, . M
w• z- r � '' .
�.}�� t r.. �•i r,,i. Yir: .�i �4.ri''/ .{fit . � ���� t -
11 Ysvv
�+J
Adz
fpf
'' 1+j `�• i ' '�,�? •��, , �'/:' a ••/ / *��P?���'-'� _'.�',� t."''' ' y. .� tit
lit
so
,I , `.l , �."�i ,t. ...fir! ^ ° �+1 ' � •n. r •/' •
� Iraq r� tI '; i�.rA,• .:- - fff[[[��i %/1 4 ' ; � .�. •
Y •�'f. -:• /� :, '�J . �'�•�' NYr. O• - )•� . ."1.. 1y�+ L�'�y.♦�+r /. r .t'.
�r ♦. iP� 4... i�,, i. Jul { • ,�.y
?•ti �•_. g.•.1t♦f .p
Nil
`,•:� ��• .,� �`k.� P• •Y r/:l� Y . yr•�: a :!:: ! �Sr `� �,�` �� iQr�� ri+'Nfs � ' . Lo :
�. i'.:r•%.i 7, •• � ♦/ Zia 9•�' ri�Eh��"^,Y/ .S•;. •j+ti .�; :�f t.� ,
y Yn tif• -�. �^ ,, w .'�. + � 'b, • �;•.:� a er' !,: '• '� ♦ ?`�:.s,.ra+tir�j..ji:'� "'Y.= �-.
j � � `i•,l � � ti /t_,,' f .., � •i 44r �/� .•cf ..
�4V."'. �{�'• � `+IC'� • � E 'fil+ ��7!1�" ilk ,�°ry /I`71�. s��,+�;. � •� .� �l ~ ++
J : to 7?•y7'�� ,-' � , �� • !'�" . _ _
• J
4. ; �,•.� „r .� "ate �. .,,,,
Wall
., 5�'],p%w';:!!/4�r.. l•JF• i s ,: ``1v�� .Y ..,ram-
+//�/ ��� '.q • , fir, ) i � l� ��• '�' � '' y�' • � ti,�` � f ` � ` 'r r�'••'� �r..' .
'�C% ^s`4Y °'•'ti �..R�� •� • 5^ n Yl► � , �.: ii .r : y�� �, � �{ �,; Ay7� 11(+" `:. .�! : "'.•
S, ;� Yr • �•l "t fit' i, - }. •E,s�. `s '. Y
FELLOWSHIP CHUCH
Drainage Summary
Evaluation of Drainage to Offsite Pond
Pre Development Areas
Acres
C Factor
CA
Offsite from north and west
106.00
0.25
26.50
Building
0.19
0.90
0.17
Paved Surface
0.67
0.90
0.60
Gravel Surface
0.23
0.50
0.12
Other
12.26
0.20
2.45
Total Acres to Pond -
119.35
Weighted C Factor -
0.25
Post Development Areas
Acres
C Factor
CA
Offsite from north and west
106.00
0.25
26.50
Building
0.52
0.90
0.47
Paved Surface
1.34
0.90
1.21
Gravel Surface
0.23
0.50
0.12
Other
11.26
0.20
2.25
Total Acres to Pond - 119.35
Weighted C Factor - 0.26
Time Of Concentration
High Elv -
910
Lo elv -
781
Length -
3500
ft
Ditch Type -
grass
T(c) =
15
min
i(2) =
3.4
in/hr
i(10) =
4.6
in/hr
i(100) =
6.6
in/hr
Pre Development Peak Flows to Pond
Post Development Peak Flows to Pond
Q(2) -
101.5
cfs
Q(2) - 103.8 cfs
Q(10) -
137.3
cfs
Q(10) - 140.5 cfs
0(100) -
197.0
cfs
Q(100) - 201.6 cfs
Attachment #2
Attachment #3
Pre Development Storm Routing
* ROUT VERSION 5.3b ** PROJECT: Fell Church Pd Pre 10 ** DATE: 2/19/1991*
(Types:
!:Weir; 2:Pipe; 3:Riser) Structure 1
Structure 2
___________
Structure 3
___________
1:
Type
___________
2: Pipe
2: Pipe
1: Weir
Weir:
2:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
782.50
3:
Length (ft)
0.00
0.00
30.00
4:
Coefficient
0.00
0.00
3.33
Riser:
5:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
6:
Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.06
7:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
8:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
9:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
10:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
11:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
12:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pipe:
13:
Invert Elevation
(ft)
781.43
781.43
0.00
14:
Diameter (in)
8'00
8.00
0.00
15:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
16:
Length (ft)
9.00
9.00
0.00
17:
Manning's n
0.023
0.023
0.000
IS:
Slope (ft/ft)
0.021
0.021
0.000
19:
Entrance Loss Coefficient
0.6
0.6
0.0
Surface:
20:
lnitial Elevation
(ft)
781.43
Storage
Pond
Characteristics:
Section
Elevation
Area
(ft)
(sq ft)
______________________________
1
779.17
0.00
(Calculated)
2
781.43
21425.00
3
782.00
26825.0),
4
782.50
33025.00
Control: RW = Riser acting as a weir
RO = Riser acting as an orifice ---
PI = Horizontal pipe in inlet control
PO = Horizontal pipe in outlet control
Time
Inflow
Pipe
Pipe
Weir
Total
Elev
Storage
(min)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(f+)
(cu ft)
___________________________________________________________________________
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
781.43
0.00
2.0
18.30
0.0
PI
0.0
PI
0.0
0.02
781.47
899.33
4.0
36.60
0.1
PI
0.1
PI
0.0
0.22
781.62
4,196.40
6.0
54.90
0.3
PO
0.3
PO
0.0
0.59
781.84
91713.31
8.0
73.20
0.9
PI
0.9
PI
0.0
1.78
782.12
17,315.22
10.0
91.50
1.3
PO
1.3
PO
0.0
2.54
782.45
27,028.97
12.0
109.80
1.6
PO
1.6
PO
15.0
18.10
782.78
38,071.97
14.0
128.10
1.8
PO
1.8
PO
43.2
46.72
783.07
48,539.91
16.0
131.77
1.9
PO
1.9
PO
70.0
73.84
783.29
56039.01
18.0
120.82
2.0
PO
2.0
PO
87.9
91.92
783.42
62,162.50
20.0
109.86
2.0
PO
2.0
PO
95.1
99.21
783.47
64,208.77
22.0
98.90
2.1
PO
2.1
PO
97.3
101.39
783.48
649817.33
24.0
87.94
2.0
PO
2.0
PO
94.0
98.05
783.46
63,886.32
26.0
76,98
2.0
PO
2.0
PO
87.5
91.57
783.42
62,062.06
28.0
66.02
2.0
PO
2.0
PO
79.3
83.29
783.36
59,697.09
30.0
55.07
1.9
PO
1.9
PO
71.6
75.51
783.30
57,430.09
32.0
44.11
1.9
PO
1.9
PO
63.0
66.80
783.24
54,S35.75
34.0
33.15
1.8
PO
1.8
PO
53.9
57.56
763.16
52,001.32
36.0
22.19
1.8
PO
1.8
PO
44.5
48.05
783.08
48,974.38
38.0
11.23
1.7
PO
1.7
PO
35.0
38.48
783.00
45,774.43
* ROUT VERSION 5.3b ** PROJECT: Fell Church Pd Pre 100 ** DATE: 2/19/1991*
(Types:
1:Weir; 2:Pipe; 3:Riser) Structure 1
___________
Structure 2
Structure 3
l:
Type
2: Pipe
___________
2! Pipe
___________
1: Weir
Weir:
2:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
782.50
3:
Length (ft)
0.00
0.00
30.00
4:
Coefficient
0.00
0.00
3.33
Riser:
5:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
6:
Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
7:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
8:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
9:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
10:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
11:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
12:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pipe:
13:
Invert Elevation
(ft)
781.43
781.43
0.00
14:
Diameter (in)
8.00
8.0O
0.00
15:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
16:
Length (ft)
9.00
9.00
0.00
17:
Manning's n
0.023
0.023
0.000
IS:
Slope (ft/ft)
0.021
0.021
0.000
19:
Entrance Loss Coefficient
0.6
0.6
0.0
Surface:
20:
Initial Elevation
(ft)
781.43
Storage
Pond
Characteristics:
Section
Elevation
Area
______________________________
(ft)
(sq ft)
1
779.17
0.00
(Calculated)
2
781.43
21425.00
3
762.00
26825.00
4
782.50
33025.00
Control:
RW
= Riser acting
as a weir
RO
= Riser acting
as an orifice
PI
= Horizontal p"pe
in inlet
control
S
PO
= Horizontal pipe
in outlet
control
Time
Inflow
Pipe Pipe
Weir
Total
Elev
Storage
(min)
___________________________________________________________________________
(cfs)
(cfs) (cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft)
(cu ft)
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
781.43
0.00
2.0
26.26
0.0 PI
0.0 PI
0.0
0.05
781.50
1,577.32
4.0
52.51
0.2 PI
0.2 PI
0.0
0.41
781.71
6,307.5t
6.0
78.77
0.7 PI
0.7 PI
0.0
1.33
782.01
14,144.31
8.0
105.03
1.2 PO
1.2 PO
0.0
2.41
782.39
25,053.62
10.0
131.28
1.6 PO
1.6 PO
15.4
18.54
782.79
38,262.31
12.0
157.54
1.8 PO
1.8 PO
51.6
55.24
783.14
51,276.21
14.0
183.80
2.0 PO
2.0 PO
90.3
94.34
783.43
62,843.97
16.0
189.07
2.2 PO
2.2 PO
123.2
127.54
783.65
71,935.35
18.0
173.34
2.2 PO
2.2 PO
143.0
147.43
783.77
77,191'57
20.0
157.62
2.2 PO
2.2 PO
149.0
153.48
783.81
78,766.77
22.0
141.90
2.2 PO
2.2 PO
147.4
151.88
783.80
78,349.84
24.0
126.18
2.2 PO
2.2 PO
139.8
144.24
783'75
76,355.99
26.0
110.45
2.2 PO
2.2 PO
128.9
133^23
783.69
73,451.87
28.0
94.73
2.1 P3
2.1 PO
117.7
121.98
783.62
70,444.87
30.0
79.01
2.1 PO
2.1 PO
105.1
109.25
783.53
66,987.76
32.0
63.28
2.0 PO
2.0 PO
91.6
95.67
783.44
63,220.14
34.0
47.56'
2.0 PO
2.0 PO
77.7
81.64
783.35
59,219.94
36.0
31.84
1.9 PO
1.9 PO
63.6
67.42
783.24
55,024.64
38.0
16.12
1.8 P[
1.8 PO
49.6
53.24
783.13
50,642.30
0
•
Attachment #4
Post Development Storm Routing
**A***t*************m**** ************************����**********************
* ROUT VERSION 5.3b ** PROJECT: Fell Church Pd Post 2 - ** DATE: 2/19/1991*
******************************************************************************
(Types:
!:Weir; 2:Pipe; 3:Riser) Structure 1
Structure 2
Structure 3
1:
___________
Type
2: Pipe
___________
2: Pipe
___________
1: Weir
Weir:
2:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
782.50
3:
Length (ft)
0.00
0.00
30.00
4:
Coefficient
0.00
0.00
3.33
Riser:
5:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
6:
Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
7:
Orifice Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
8:
Orifice Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
9:
Orifice Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
10:
Orifice Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
11:
Orifice Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
12:
Orifice Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pipe:
13:
Invert Elevation (ft)
781.43
781.43
0.00
14:
Diameter (in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
15:
Orifice Diameter (in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
16:
Length (ft)
9.00
9.00
0.00
17:
Manning's n
0.023
0.023
0.000
18:
Slope (ft/ft)
0.021
0.021
0.000
19:
Entrance Loss Coefficient
0.6
0.6
0.0
Surface:
20:
Initial Elevation (ft)
781.43
Storage
Pond
Characteristics: Section
Elevation
Area
______________________________
(ft)
(sq ft)
1
779.17
0.00
(Calculated)
2
781.43
21425.00
3
782.00
26825.00
4
782.50
33025.0f:,
Control:
RW
= Riser acting as a weir
RO
= Riser acting as an orifice
PI
= Horizontal pipe in inlet
control
PO
= Horizontal pipe in outlet
control
Time
Inflow
Pipe Pipe
Weir
Total
Elev
Storage
(min)
(cfs)
(cfs) (cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft)
(cu ft)
___________________________________________________________________________
0.0
0.00
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.00
781.43
0.00
2.0
14.07
0.0 PI 0.0 PI
0.0
0.01
781.46
689.84
4.0
28.13
0.1 PI 0.1 PI
0.0
0.14
7B1.57
3,223.35
6.0
42.20
0.3 PI 0.3 PI
0.0
0.52
781.75
7,427.63
8.0
56.27
0.6 PI 0.6 PI
0.0
1.22
781.98
13,270.94
10.0
70.34
1.0 PO 1.0 PO
0.0
2.09
782.24
209723.41
12.0
84.40
1.4 PO 1'4 PO
0.7
3.38
782.54
14.0
98.47
1.6 PO 1.6 PO
18.1
21.31
782.82
29,80�.84
39,41l.90
16.0
101.29
1.8 PO 1.8 PO
40.2
43.72
783.04
47,550.21
18.0
92.87
1.9 PO 1.9 PO
56.9
60.64
783.19
52,957.53
20.0
84.45
1.9 PO 1.9 pO
64.9
68.72
783.25
55,414.19
22.0
76.02
1.9 PO 1.9 PO
68.2
72.08
783.28
56,418.57
24.0
67.60
1.9 PO 1.9 PO
68.1
71.97
783.27
56,385.34
26.0
59.18
1.9 PO 1.9 PO
64.7
68.47
783.25
55,340.04
28.0
50.75
1.9 PO 1.9 PO
59.3
63.02
783.21
53,689.42
30.0
42.33
1.8 PO 1.8 PO
52.8
56.47
783.15
51,660.41
32.0
33.90
1.8 PO 1.8 PO
47.0
50.62
783.10
49,805.0.
34.0
25.48
1.8 PO 1.8 PO
40.6
44.11
783.05
47,678.59
36.0
17.06
1.7 PO 1.7 PO
33.8
37.23
782.99
45,342.83
38.0
8.63
1.7 PO 1.7 PO
26.8
30.18
782.92
42,829.89
^ `
* ROUT VERSION 5.3b ** PROjECT: Fell Church Pd Post 10 ** DATE: 2/19/1991*
(Types:
1:Weir; 2:Pipe; 3:Riser)
Structure 1
Structure 2
Structure 3
1: Type
___________
2: Pipe
___________
2:
Pipe
___________
1: Weir
Weir:
2: Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
782.50
3: Length (ft)
0.00
0.00
30.00
4: Coefficient
0.00
0.00
3.33
Riser:
5: Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
6: Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
7: Orifice Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
8: Orifice Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
9: Orifice Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
10: Orifice Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
11: Orifice Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
12: Orifice Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pipe:
13: Invert Elevation (ft)
781.43
781.43
0.00
14: Diameter (in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
15: Orifice Diameter (in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
16: Length (ft)
9.00
9.00
0.00
17: Manning's n
0.023
0.023
0.000
18: Slope (ft/ft)
0.021
0.021
0.000
19: Entrance Loss Coefficient 0.6
0.6
0.0
Surface:
20: Initial Elevation (ft)
781.43
Storage
Pond Characteristics: Section
Elevation
Area
_____________________________
(ft)
(sq ft)
1
779.17
0.00
(Calculated)
2 7S1.43
21425.00
3 782.00
2LS25.00
�
782.53
53025.00
Control:
RW = Riser acting as a weir
RO = Riser acting as an
orifice
PI = Horizontal pipe iq inlet control
PO = Horizontal pipe in
outlet control
Time
Inflow Pipe Pipe
Weir
Total
Elev
Storage
(min)
__
(cfs) (cfs) (cfs)
..... .... .... .... ..... ..... __ ______________________________________________________
(cfs)
(cfs)
(ft)
Wu ft)
0.0
0.00 0.0 0.0
0.0
0.00
781.43
0.00
2.0
19.03 0.0 PI 0.0 PI
0.0
0.02
781.47
935.64
4.0
38.06 0.1 PI 0.1 PI
0.0
0.23
781.62
4,364.80
6.0
57.10 0.4 PO 0.4 PO
0.0
0.70
781.86
10,075.49
8.0
76.13 0'9 PO 0.9 PO
0.0
1.85
782.15
17,977.31
10.0
95.16 1.3 PO 1.3 PO
0.0
2.61
782.48
28,085.06
12.0
114.19 1.6 PO 1.6 PO
18.1
21.27
782.82
39,306.24
14.0
133.23 1.8 PU 1.8 PO
47.5
51.15
783.11
49,975.64
16.0
137.o4 2.0 PO 2.0 PO
75.0
73 91
783.33
50,427.19
18.0
125.65 2.O PO 2.0 FO
93.1
57.M
783.45
63,637.66
20.0
114.25 2.1 PO 2.1 %
100.2
1C4.32
783.50
65,628.53
22.0
1:2.85 2.1 PG 2.1 P3
102.0
106.11
783.51
66,123.25
24.0
91.46 2,L PO 2.1 P3
98.2
132.35
783.49
65,084.15
26.0
80.06 2.0 PO 2.0 PO
91.4
05.44
783.44
63,154.28
28.0
68.66 2.0 PO 2.0 PA
82.7
86.77
783.38
60,683.95
30.0
57.27 2'0 PO 2.0 FO
74.6
78.54
793.32
58,319.16
02.0
45.87 i.9 PO 1.9 PU
65.6
69.42
783.26
55,623.31
34.0
34.47 119 PO 1.9 PO
56.0
59.76
783.18
52,684.76
36.0
23.08 1.8 PO 1.8 pO
46.2
49.83
783.10
49,551.35
38.0
11.68 1.7 PO 1.7 PO
36.4
39.84
783.01
46,242.25
' ..
* ROUT VERSION
5.3b ** PROJECT:
Fell Church
Pd Post
100 ** DATQ
2/19/1991*
(Types:
!:Weir;
2:Pipe; 3:Riser)
Structure
___________
1
Structure 2
___________
Structure 3
1:
Type
2:
Pipe
2: Pipe
-------------
in Weir
Weir:
2:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
782.50
3:
Length (ft)
0.00
0.00
30.00
4:
Coefficient
0.00
0.00
3.33
Riser:
5:
Elevation (ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
6:
Diameter (in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
7:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
8:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
9:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
10:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
11:
Orifice Elevation
(ft)
0.00
0.00
0.00
12:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
0.00
0.00
0.00
Pipe:
13:
Invert Elevation
(ft)
781.43
7S1.43
0.00
14:
Diameter (in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
15:
Orifice Diameter
(in)
8.00
8.00
0.00
16:
Length (ft)
9.00
9.00
0.00
17:
Manning's n
0.023
0.023
0.000
is:
Slope (ft/ft)
0.021
0.021
0.000
19:
Entrance Loss Coefficient
0.6
0.6
0.0
Surface:
20:
Initial Elevation
(ft)
781.43
Storage
Pond
Characteristics:
Sectior
Elevation
Area
(ft)
(sq ft)
------------------------------
1 779.17 0.03 MaIculated)
2 781.43 21425.3:
3 '� I82.0C 26825.0o
4 762.50 33025''{'
Control:
RW =
Riser
acting as a
weir
RU =
Riser
acting
as an
orifice
PI =
Horizontal
pipe in
inlet
control.
PO =
Horizontal
pipe in
outlet
control
Time
Inflow
Pipe
Pipe
Weir
Total
Flev
Storage
(min)
______________________________________
(cfs)
(cfs)
(cfs>
(cfs)
__________________________________
(cfs)
(ft)
(cu TO':
0.0
0.00
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.00
781.43
Q. C0
2.0
27.31
0.0
PI
0.0
PI
0.0
0.05
781.50
1,640.52
4.0
54.61
0.2
PI
0.2
PI
0.0
0.43
781.72
6,560.07.
6.0
81.92
0.7
PI
0.7
PI
0.0
1.41
782.03
14,70V.S7
8.0
109.23
1.2
PO
1.2
pO
010
2.48
782.42
26`059.57
10.0
136.54
1.6
PO
1.6
PO
12'6
21.82
782.83
39,617 9�
12.0
163.84
1.9
PO
1 9
pO
56'5
60.21
787.!S
32,826'58
14.0
191.15
2.w
PH
2.0
P3
9".3
100.42
733.A8
16.0
196.n3
2.2
Al
2 2
P5
1�0&
134.39
783.69
73,�58.l6
i8.0
180.28
2.2
PO
2.2
FC
1P0.1
154.55
783.81
79,045.77
20.0
163.93
2.3
PO
2'3
PH
195.9
160.47
783'35
22.0
147.57
2.3
PO
2.3
PC
153A
158.43
780.83
80,050.69
24.9
131.22
2.2
PO
2.2
PO
111'9
150.27
763.70
77,73�.----
26.0
114.87
2.2
PO
2.2
PO
154.J
138.68
783.72
74,894.0�
28'0
98.52
2.2
PO
2.2
PO
122.6
126.38
783.65
71,758.T8
30.0
82.17
2.1
PO
2.1
PO
109.4
113.56
783.56
68'165.7Z
32.0
65.82
2.0
PO
2'0
PO
95.3
99.38
783'47
64,258.16
34.0
49.46
2.0
PO
2.0
PO
80.8
84.74
733.37
60,114'93
36.0
33.11
1.9
PO
1.9
PO
60.1
69.92
783.26
38.0
16.76
1.8
PO
1.8
PO
51.5
55.14
783.14
51,242.Z�
+ 4 t t. t + + + + + + + Al + + + +: :F * + * 4, *
+ p 0 1
WE. k P i-I R I
P P' - 1 1 FPI 1 5 59
T HR T T I r-1 L P4 G E 1-1 C-1 T E
Cl I
1 5 51 7 1 7 Cl 0 7 1 3 CI K
* AF'F' �: 1� a i rtt_;r�i iHl_IF iIFFA . P. 1 /3
pAX TRANSMITTAL (Do not staple)
r C% ��� aRCHITEG7S
SCfgvrtsTs
ick
COMPANY: _ f
LOCATION:
FAX NnBER . 7O ? "_ _`� �• V �,
(' r FROM: �� irk 1r=� E NUMBER:
Il�d► �., 11PROJECT ---
/ TOTAL PAGES:
DATE : � TIME: _ --
00�
MESSAGE: —
WC, 14
If problems occur w-� ___...�.
this fax, please call-1-703-385-3568
Operator: _ &'� C/F/DG9
■ 1134n gizples h1i:! petal, Suite 100, Fnirftix, Virginia 22030 M 703 3R5.3566 ■ Fix 103-385.8319
pr:n:ccl 01 , recvzree paps.
f P.2/3
April 19, 1991
Mr. Ed Strawsnyder
Director of Engineering
Frederick County_
9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA. 22601
Re: Fellowship Bible Church
17555.131
Dear Ed:
As requested, I have reviewed the above site plan. My comments are summarized
as follows:
A. ACCESS
1. The proposed plan is the first phase of a two -phased addition to the
existing site. No additional site access points to Rte. 628 are
proposed. The existing access appears adequate for both the first
and second phases. Traffic counts along Rte. 628 would be necessary
to assess if turn lanes would be warranted from the road.
B. GRADING. DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL
1. I see no apparent problem with the proposed grading for this first
phase. In fact. I do not see a problem with the grading Q5 proposed
for the second phase. For the purposes of construction and insuring
proper grading, spot elevations are needed in the second phase
building corners, entrances, parking lot corners, and changes in
grade.
2. Based on my observation of the grading plan, this site sits in the
path of drainage coming from the northwest crossing Rte.
Rte. 628, and Rte. 652. The majority of the thru drain4_
diverted to the south of the building site. In the large sch,
things this first addition has very little impact to increase runoff
from the site. On a similar perspective, the second phase does not
have much imp;:- However, to the property immediately downstream,
this increase will be more noticeable in that more runoff will reach
them quicker. There is no problem in postponing any stormwater
management until the final phase (phase 2) of this improvement plan.
I do recommend that stormwater management be required at that. time.
3 The soils in this area are categorized in the Type C nydrologic
group. Therefore, a higher degree of runoff will occur. For this
reason, I do not concur with the runoff coefficients of 0.2 or 0.25
for the calculations. As an offset, the designer has used a time of
concentration that appears shorter for a 100-acre drainage area thaw
I would normally expect unless the slopes are great, channels
well-defined and travel distance relatively short, which may well be
the case here. This could be verified. In any event, I feel that
the runoff rates may be significantly underestimated. This has very
little significance in this particular plan other than it could
indicate a lesser degree of impact from this development on the
downstream properties. It would also indicate that the existing pond
is less adequate as a stormwater management facility even though it
is indicated inadequate as presented.
C. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROLS
1. Assuming that both phases are not to be constructed at this time, I
would suggest a silt fence to the south of the construction entrance
just outside the construction road to the phase 1 building. This
would catch most of the silt prior to the check dam as indicated.
2. Inlet protection should be provided around the courtyard inlet and
the culvert under the future parking lot for phase 2 if the phase 2
grading and culvert occur during this first construction phase.
Based on my review and comments, I can recommend approval of the first phase
building improvements with the E&S modifications. It is my opinion that the
second phase should incorporate stormwater management provisions in accordance
with the current State and County requirements. If this site is not required
to do so, then why would we require the adjacent properties to do so in the
future?
If you have any question or do not agree, please let me know.
Sincerely,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Paul A. Bernard, P.E.
Project Manager
cc: Tom Price - Gilbert Clifford & Associates