Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout006-91 Auto Laundry (Stephens City) - Opequon District - Backfile (2)RECEIPT C:-0 C23034 AMMPT DUE $ `/,off AMOUNT PAID $ BALANCE DUE PAID BY CASH lj_ZHECK ❑ OTHER FREDERICK COWITY 5-PT. OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT P.O. BOX 601, 9 COURT SQUARE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 2Z601 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS _ Ze 74,ze'd THE SUM OF FOR O BY DAY -TIMERS RE -ORDER No. 3221 — Printed in USA SITE PLAN CHECKLIST The application is not complete if the following are not Present 1 set of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan: VDOT City of Winchester Co. San. Auth. Co. Health Dept. Inspections Parks & Rec. Fire Marshall Airport Authority Engineer 2. 1 copy of the SITE PLAN Application 411� 3. 5 copies of the plan on a single sheet 4. 1 reproducible copy of the plan (if required) 5. a 35mm. slide of the plan (if required) TRACKING DATE /9.9/Application Received Review/Invoice received from Engineer Fee Paid (amount $ ) Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required) Final Site Plan submitted with review agency, Planning Commission, and staff comments addressed. COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIR IA DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIO • Caller - 11M WIC-50" Time Called Date Called 11 1-7111 Phone No. 722.- 5093 Time Requested Date Requested j 8r9 j Received By EyAvJ A. INYRr1 Date of Inspection PERMIT HOLDER NAME 47tzorJ'�" J ���5 +• RT. NO. Lot No. SEC. No. SUBDIVISION STREET NAME DIRECTIONS 10L nr -L,)U LUi s l.'/' BUILDING NO. 1S' M?1W =Eti 7- 1 1 • PLUMBING NO. _ ELECTRICAL NO. MECHANICAL NO. - SIGN NO. DISTRICT l )PEQUon� _ PERMIT FOR: A Urti LAj4.10 gy CAS WA -s+1 Type of Inspection Residential / Commercial ✓ Footers Setbacks: FR BK L R Slab Draintile Gas Fire -up Final Electrical Water Service Framing Final Mechanical Sewer Rough Electric Final Site Plan Rough Plumbing Rough Mechanical Final Building Fire Marshall Groundworks Gas Piping/Test Final Plumbing Special/Complaint Other: Time In: In'• 4-S" Temperature 440( Cut in No. Time Out: It ' 0 Sa►H _ Weather 6VF-12Q-A -:i — Results: (Approved ,A, Fd2 Tr&P. �- V•np Rejected Comments: �l�"d La'aAAl. f:y -� C.. d• a Signature __y(,A, Date 1� /9 i I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 HAND DELIVERED July 16, 19-91 Mr. Frank Dehaven Dehaven and Wilson Enterprises P.O. Box 2236 Winchester, Va 22601 Dear. Mr. Wilson: This letter shall serve as notice that a Stop Work Order has been issued for the construction activities in progress at Auto Laundry, Inc. located on Route 647 as a result of failure to install the Erosion and Sediment Control measures specified on the approved plan. This order is issued for a period of seven (7) days or until the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan requirements have been satisfied. Be advised that any work attempted other than what is required to bring the site into compliance is prohibited. If such work is attempted, criminal charges will be filed immediately. When you feel that you have satisfied this requirement, please call me to set up an inspection. Sincerely, Lanny C. Bise II Planner I/Zoning Inspector THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 0 • ,_ -, S C"--)(r f 1 1 May 22, 1991 DeHaven & Wilson Enterprises ATTN: Mr. Frank DeHaven 137 North Frederick Pike Winchester, Virginia Dear Mr. DeHaven: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/ 678-068, The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #006-91 of Auto Laundry on May 21, 1991. This plan calls for the construction of a 2400 square foot automatic car wash, four (4) 1800 square feet self wash units, six (6) vacuum stations, an asphalt maneuvering area complete with curb and gutter and traffic directional arrows, Class I rip rap protection around the inlets, an on -site stormwater management area, a fire hydrant, a six foot solid wooden fence, landscaping and buffering, and all required erosion and sediment control measures. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter, please contact me. Sincerely, Lal a - Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW/dds cc: Mr. Dudley H. Rinker, Opequon District Supervisor Mr. Austin Spitler, Greenway Engineering Mr. Michael A. Didawick, Director of General Reassessment THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 July 2, 1991 Greenway Engineering Inc. Attn: Mr. Austin Spitler 1104 Baker Lane Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Stephens City Auto Laundry Site Plan. Dear Austin: This letter regards the site plan for Auto Laundry located on Route 647 in the Opequon Magisterial District. As you know, this site plan received final approval on May 21, 1991. The reason for this letter is to point out an error made during the site plan review. I classified Route 647 as a minor arterial road as specified by the County's Comprehensive Plan. This road is actually classified as a major collector road under the same plan. Because of the error in this classification, you were required to have all buildings setback fifty (50) feet from the property line. The actual setback for buildings along major collector roads is thirty-five (35) feet. The setback for the automatic carwash building is shown on the site plan as forty (40) feet. This conforms with the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and should be built with the setbacks shown on the approved site plan. I will change the approved copies of the site plan in our office and include this letter with the file. Please keep this letter with your files as documentation of this event. I will be happy to answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, I Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: Mr. Frank DeHaven THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 M M D D Y Y X X C l %I �ICIyI 7I/ 111 01 11 • DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AN SCUE COUNTY OF FREDERI P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350 DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME I TYPE OF 04SPECT1pN t�ikrCrvMVhOOd M M D D� YY H HM M H H M M LAST FIRST rl t/I /Iel/1c�%I I/I"A1316 tI�r I yet/ ?-,I�II�C I I I I I-Z�e'ILII-'I�I-�I �I 2Uspnkl«rx 3" &a n sysbm . u averMed door STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUIT APT SRA 41 4, I �i4 o .e , -I V I —I —I —I 62 / sLGI new bwldinq 6" tburn^9 PerrrM 7" bia>uiq eu��� 9" wont 10" Wan review OCCUPANT TELEPHONE IIZI61— � Ie�Pei V,f-,9t='ICI 1 I I 1 1 I I !i n n I/1�131-tG'l�'1/l-ltI I�131 MANAGER/ REPRESENTATiVe BUSINESS TELEPHONE 11 U ust mStallepOn 12U ust leak 13" ust removal 14U ust kqurd soil BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE I I I I I I I I I l I I I I l I I I I I I I I I I I I l 1 I I I-1 1 1 1-I I I I I FIXED PROPERTY l l l l Lux [->,�c%c- f , NUMBER OF STORIES 15I_I nxwal nspecbm 16" cornplsrw 17LJ wdtalion CONSTRUCTION TYPE I U hie resistive 3 non-combustible 5 U txOlected orcnary 7 LJ protected wood Ireme 9 U nil cute s4W ,I�protected 2 U heavy timber a l V/unprotected warn-combusUde 6 LJ unprotected ordmery 8 unproected wood 0 L—J undebrnwred 18L_� fire Iw rupectm 19" Ere Oro rlpprovN 2oU re-nepeceon FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT a RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD Y Y IM M D D Y I I I I I I I I I I I I ' LJ J—U LJ —lJIU E�f U U U 2,"aQ1er INSPECTION GUIDELINE -CORRECTIONS REQUIRED - The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING EXIT AND EGRESS C 61 Unapproved or Delete" Cas Connection C I Space Under Starts Used for Storage Purposes ❑ 31 Inadequate Means of Egress C:62 Damaged or Deteriorated *itPoe on Gas Bul Awkwice C 2 Broken Ceilings and or Walls — Exposed lath on Ceilings ando Mgls 032 Second Means of Egress Not Readily Accessible " 63. Vart Hoods. Vent Fans and%or Duct Systems Need Cka ing (Unnatural Openings) O 33 Arks and%or Passageways Obstructed C 64 Combustibles Being Stored New Hot Water Heater C 3 Defector and%oalr Unapproved Incinerator aSpark Arrestor Screen ❑ 3a Panic Hardware (Ant -Parer Latdes and Bob) Required on Exit Doors C:,a Cardboard Ceilings ander Walls ❑ 35. Discharge From Exits. Outside Building. Et. ORDINARY HAZARDS ❑ 5 Fire Door Not Serviceable 036 Exitway Blocked ands Obsrcted C 65 Poor Housekeeping Conditions C 6 Fire Door Blocked or Wedged Open ❑ 37 Exit Door Locked arid of Bamcaded C 66 Improper Storage C 7 Oil Soaked wood Fleas C 38 Exit Not Property Designated or Marked C 67 Silage of Floor OAs, Clew" Compounds. ftes. Polishes, Etc C 8 Attic Areas Open to the Outside. Screen to Prevent Entry by Birds C 39 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative C 68 Storage of Excelsior. Straw. Sawdust, Burup. Et. O 9 Doors Requiring Self -Closing Devices Not So Equipped ❑ a0 Ituninatng Directional Signs t Exits Required C 69 Meta Drip Parr Required. But Not Provided ❑ 10 Pronidove—Snouid Be Rued ❑ 41 Exm Door Swirgriq Against Lane of Elan Tavel C 70 Exces" Grease on Stove ❑ 11. Open and Exposed Foundation Beneath Bulling 042 Stairways Not Properly Er>cbsed and%or Equipped With Non-Stwill Doors C 71 Cockbft Cara Off ❑ 12 Post Max Occupancy Load C 43 Starways Not Property aumwuted C 72 Unapproved Trash Containers ❑ 1a Emergency White Lights ELECTRICAL C 13 illegal and%or Boot -Leg Wiring FIRE PROTECT1aN SPECIAL HAZARDS C 73 Unnecessary and%or Disordery, Accumulation of Boxes. Cartors, Etc. C 1 a Inadequate Service antler krufhcient Circuits ❑ a5 Fire Extinguishers Required, But Not Provided ❑ a6 Fie Extinguishers Need Fecbargi grlspection Collapse —Merman Orderly Arrangement "No C 15 Insul6perit Receptacles ❑ 16 Detective. Deteriorated or Speed Wrirq 047 Unapproved Type Fie Exbriqurhers C 7/ Smdug in Hazardous Location, Srrabg' Sign Needed ❑ 75 Flammable Liquids ado Gum Berg Impropery Used ardor Shed ❑ 17 Defective and%or Broken Fxtures 048 Fire Extinqurshers NO Properly Moulted 4'-60' 049 Fire Extinguishers Not Readily Visible ❑ 76. Inadequate Winbfaton in Hazardous Location 018 Defecmee and%or Broken Switches and%or Sockets 050 Standpipe Hose Deferioaa edrNot Racked ❑ 77 Stxage of Compressed GasCy6das Without Props Andiorage (Racks or 019 Circuit Breakers By -Passed or Boded Open 020 Oversize Fuses wilt Circuit Breakers Set Too High g C 51 Fire Protection System Chill l 078 �� a Oh Locations ❑ 21 Pennies Be" Plug Type Fuses ❑ 52 Detective Standpipe Nooks ❑ 53 Stwidpoe System Disconnected ❑ 79 Oxygen Cytrders BBdng Stored New Acetylenen Etc Cylinders ❑ 22 Metal Strip of Fuse Holder Cut Bad ❑ 23 Fuses Jumped or Bridged O 54 Sprinkler Heads. Cut-0Ns or Siamese Blocked ❑ 80 Om" Materials Being Stored With Acids, Sulpha C 81 Unapproved and%or Hazardous Pant Spray" 024 Open Junction Box and%or Fuse Box ❑ 55 inadequate Sprinkler Head Clearance 08 Indies Required) ❑ 82 Task Room Door Not EQ"W With Self-Cbeirip Device C 25. Fuse Panel Obstructed VWU Inaccessible 30' 056 Santler Valves Not Properly Identified ❑ 83 Open Flame Heating in Hazardous Location ❑ 26 Morons and%or Fars Dirty or Dust Covered HEATING AND COOKING C 84 Vacant at Time of Inspection O 27 Unapproved ExtensionCords/Drop Cads ❑ 57 Detective Heating Unn—Fumace. Gas Bois. Stove. Heater. Etc 085 Locked a Time of Inspection 028 Excessive Use of Mumple Ousel Pips ❑ 58. Detective Cooling Uric—RObstr Hot Plat. Etc O 56, See Supplement Sheet ❑ 29. Lamps. Fixtures. Equpmetl Et.. Not Property Elidosed (Hazardous Llaptdls tiny) Olstruarid/or t Protec p eel ❑ 60. Gas Meier Blocked andlHeating. O 60. Furnace, Boils. Haong, Cooking :ndAX SmbkeDipe old Malt Pipe 87 IN THE OPINION OF THE INSPECTOR, THERE WERE NO KVARDOUS .❑ 30 Dad and praised W1 II Should Be Removed Clearances. From Combustible Mawtaks, Not Standard CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA AT THE 11ME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMEENN�TS The conditions reported on leis form reflect the preman as observed by ouir inspector, at the vine of frtapection. Any error or onimiseion regardNlg 6 Nt safety or conditlon6 regarl ks pi rm illott are uni Rational and are not desired the faun of the cotxly OF INSPECTOR FRECETWD BY FOW ES-1 0 • SITE PLAN APPLICATION DATE -d 1'5) - f>/ APPLICATION # cou '-(3� ` 1. Development Name; 4417-0 �.441/IDie / 1AIC. 2. Location of Property: to OU7Zc 6v*% 5� � �' G/rY- (by street name) 3. Property Owner: G MMAZ7r 4 60N-$ 11 iC • PeVeLopm- D69 4V15M * ► l l u:L ON ENT Address: P• d• BOX 7254 k(i �►c�+Es-r VA. Telephone: �o Z 3�CJZ 4 . Applicant/Agent: ztt V6VINI Address: I1d4' 84*-62 6AV6 Telephone: 5. Designer: Address: Telephone: Contact: 1104 23AA4EZ 144NGc Al�57 W, ,Y.W. ZZlod c;2ceZ a 6. Is this an original or revised Site Plan? Original 4-1 Revised 7. Total area of parcel to be developed: ©• 4CO65 8. Property Information: a) Tax Map: b) Parcel Nu c) Tax ID # : d) Current Zoning: .E5 " / e) Present Use: l 4CW /U % f ) Proposed Use: 4v-;D L/ g) Adjoining Property Zoning: h) Adjoining Property Use: 8vS/,�/ESs �SiO�.c1T/�L i) Magisterial District: I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the submission of my site an. Applicant's Signature: 6 Z-6 1 �1- - C:1 • SITE PLAN #006-91 AUTO LAUNDRY (Stephens City) LOCATION: Route 647, Stephens City MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 74B 5 1 D PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Business), present use - vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Business) and R-P (Residential Performance), present use - business and residential PROPOSED USE: Car wash REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter dated April 17, 1991 from W. H. Bushman, VDOT, to Greenway, Inc. Fire Marshal: Fire lanes must be posted in front of hydrants per Frederick County Chapter 10. The location of the hydrant complies with Frederick County Chapter 10; however, locating the hydrant on site, inside the first entrance would provide a safer location for pump operator as truck would be off of Route 647 and out of traffic. Inspections Dept.: Must comply with Use Group B, Section 303.0 of the 1987 BOCA. Sanitation Authority: Approved. Consulting Engineer: See attached letter dated October 31, 1990. Planning & Zoning: The proposed car wash is located along Route 647 in the Opequon Magisterial District. This site is zoned B-1 (Neighborhood, Business) which now allows car washes by right. The overall concept of the site plan meets the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance; 0 • however, some minor revisions to the site plan are necessary. The greatest concern of the staff reflects the screening requirements. When a B-1 parcel is being developed next to residential property, a B category screening requirement is necessary. The site plan does not reflect the intent of a B category screen; however, the staff feels that the open area between Plymn-Owen Estates and the car wash can be utilized to accomplish this zoning requirement. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 5115191 P/C MEETING: Approval, provided that all review agency comments are addressed and the Planning Commission recommends approval of this site plan. APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST Your site plan should include the'following: RV-05 up -o-- IRIM-00-MVP WON I • It . • Y N 1. Name of proposed development 2. Name and address of owner — 3. Name and address of developer 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer — 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions _✓ 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional zoning approval ✓ 8. A space labeled "approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval Y N !✓ _ 9. Location map (scale 1:2000) 10. Magisterial District of site 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 12. North Arrow L✓ = 13. Zoning of site 14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties Y N ✓ 15. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels _ 16. Acreage of all lots included in the plan ^_ 17. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks _ and yard areas 18. Location of all buildings, structures, and uses _ 19. The proposed use of each building, structure, and — _ 20. area The location and type of all dwelling units _✓ 21. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings With FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts 22. The height of all buildings and structures 23. The location and dimension of all signs 7 Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures (con't) Y N _✓ _ 24. Location of outdoor lighting fixtures 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas 26. Location and area of common open space 27. Location and description of all recreation facilities _ ✓ 28. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways 29. Location of outdoor trash receptacles Roads Y N _ _✓ 30. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site _ _✓ 31. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads _ 33. Location and dimensions • of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways Utilities Y N _✓ _ 34. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals _ 35. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility and drainage easements 36. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet the Fire Code requirements Y N gfa 37. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces �¢- 38. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing, and other features to be used 39. Location and dimension of all handicapped spaces ME n 0 Natural Features Y N 40. Existing and finished contour lines /- 41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features ✓ 42. Location of streams and drainage ways Landscaping Y N 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used _✓ _ 44. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles Erosion and Sediment Control Y N ✓� _ 45. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used 46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with location, types, and examples of provisions to be used 9 ,1t • • COUNTY of FREDERIC Depar[ment of Plannin, and DC�elup111C RE �UEST FOR —.703STE PLAN CO�NTS F:\ 7A3 on7•.ao5- \ u." guua DePant of Transportation P-0. Box 278 703) g' ouginia 22824-0278 (703) 984-4133 The local office of the Transportation Departure 1550 Coume•rce Street, if you pretax, to hand deliver form, iv is located at liver this revi,;w APPlicant's name, address and Phone nuuLt>er: Cr Lr r of develo --�- Pment and/or description of the request: �Y,C Location: r r h C, �.ar�.W� Transportation Oepax-tment Comments: See attached letter to Greenway, Inc. from Bushman dated April 17, 1991. VDOT (NOTICEgTOtVDOTure andPLEAS / LEASE RETJUN THIS ' f /7 THIS FORM TO THE APPLIC T. It is your res NBC= To APPLICANT Possible Ponsibilzty to complete this roan as a in order to assist the agency with their r Please attach �?EE copies of your plans and/or - — / r . pptorn . Court Square APR 9 P.O. Box 601 Winchester. Virginia 11 -. RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER Mr. H. Bruce Edens, C/O Greenway, Inc. 1104 Baker Lane COMMONWEALTH of VIRC-jINIA L.S.B. Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Bruce: DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN ( 703 ) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER April 17, 1991 Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrance Auto Laundry, Inc. Route 647 Frederick County This is to acknowledge receipt of the above referenced project's revised site plans dated April 15, 1991. They appear to have been revised in accordance with our recommendations of October 31, 1990 and are therefore approved. Please advise the developer accordingly. Before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way a land use permit must be applied for and issued to cover said work. This permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector while working on the right-of-way. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please give me a call. RBC / rf Attach. xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. R. W. Watkins Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Re(.side�nt Engineer (� , . By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY i COMINIONWEALTH ®f VIRCINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER ( 703 ) 984-4133 April 17, 1991 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Mr. H. Bruce Edens, L.S.B. Ref: Proposed Connercial Entrance C/O Greenway, Inc. Auto Laundry, Inc. 1104 Baker Lane Route 647 Winchester, VA 22601 Frederick County Dear Bruce: This is to acknowledge receipt of the above referenced project's revised site plans dated April 15, 1991. They appear to have been revised in accordance with our recormendations of October 31, 1990 and are therefore approved. Please advise the developer accordingly. Before any work is performed on the State's right-of-way a land use permit must be applied for and issued to cover said work. This permit is issued by this office and will require a minimum processing fee, surety bond coverage and the salary & expenses of a State assigned Inspector while working on the right-of-way. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please give me a call. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer Qt,j �6. &fv ice"" By: Robert B. Childress B%y. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf Attach. Yc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. R. W. Watkins APR 1 8lggl ,I r ,4 COMMONWEALTH ®f VlRCj NIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER October 31, 1990 Mr. Austin Spitler Ref: Proposed Commercial Entrances C/O Greenway Engr. & Surveying Co., Inc. Auto Laundry, Inc. 1104 Baker Lane Route 647 Winchester, VA 22601 Frederick County Dear Austin: As requested we have reviewed the above referenced site plan dated September 5, 1990. Our recom endations may be found on the attached plans marked in red and as follows: 1. In order to eliminate the deep ditch within the entrance island, the two (2) culverts should be extended and standard DI-3B with a 4' slot length added as noted. Also, the proposed DI-7 drop inlet should be raised to approximate elevation 761.0 and a concrete flume with erosion control stone added at the end of the southern radius to contain additional surface water. 2. The existing asphalt taper to the north is to be removed and the proposed taper to the south shortened to 36' as noted. 3. The existing sight distance, reference and speed limit are to be added to the plans. Please revise and resubmit four (4) copies for final approval. Should any changes be deemed necessary please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Should you have any questions concerning the above, do not hesitate to call. RBC / rf Attach. xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. R. W. Watkins Sincerely, William H. Bushman Tr sp. Resident Engineer eA By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY 9 COUNTY of FREDthl�,r. Dcpartmcm of Plann►n ana DcvcWNu►c 70 REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS 0.1 Frederick County Sanitation Authority P.O. Box 618, Winchester, virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review roxm- aPPlicatat's name, addreaa "ad Phan e .Uum mr: ` ,4 % /.UG'. //0 4 (j�•�E•� GAr. GVivch'ESTEiz t,if Zze o Name of development and/or description of the request: X11U7_0 LA11V-011? y /106". Location: • ��¢,ST �'/I�� O`�T� G�7- /300 ' .tJa.�TH rJ� �PT� ZZ7 Sanitation Authority Co=mBntm: `17`/21 AF ✓/2-�_W /¢/Q/ /d O fin Sanit. Signature & Date: 9 (NOTICE TO SANITATION - EA�MN�Tlklis FORM T A.PPLICANT.� NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to co=plece this form as accurately 44 possible in order to assist the agency with their review. A1G, please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or appl Ole 2 jp__ - — _5 9 C.)Ur( :;ausre P.O. B0\ 601j AM n�ht�l�r, V�r�►n►.► . , 0 i COUNTY of FREDERICI. Department of Planning and Dc%ciupmru 70Z o0-50_i REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS F`\X 703 oo7-413-.1 Frederick County. inspections Depaz-tmPnt P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5651 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 Court - Square in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: 41&. Name of development and/or description of the request: Qt,.fLaL,.4,\ ry nc- - Location: 1 �C C4St �T �f KT (D`i / 4� �TrI i)C'A `11 C, a Inspections Department Comments: Must compy with Use Group B, Section 303.0 of the 1987 BOCA. (See 1st Site Plan comment sheet) Inspect. Signature & Date: L, - O (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS - PLEASE RETU N T FO TO APPLICANT. NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accuratelyas possible in , rder to assist ''.he agency with them r ew please attacha copy of your plans and/or appl'�4,T 7. 9 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - %Vinchester, Vir;ictia - �, A 'I rw..wo... w'q" �N�Y OF FREDERICK, VIRGIN' - FlRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE -- LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 102490536 Date Received 102490 Date Reviewed 121290 Applicant Name Greenway Engineering Company Address 1104 Baker Lane Winchester, VA 22601 Project Name Auto Laundry Phone No. 703-662-4185 Type of Application Site Plan Current Zoning 8-1 ___ 1st Due Fire Co. 11 1st Due Rescue Co. 12 Election District Opequon RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire A1arm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No Comments: Fire Lanes must be posted in front of hydrants per Frederick County Chapter 10. Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X inadequate Special Hazards Noted; yes _ Comments: Not Identified W. Hydrant Locations; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified X Additional Comments: The location of the hydrant complies with Frederick - County Chapter 10; however, locating the hydrant on site, inside the first __-- entrance would provide a safer location for pump operator as truck would �� be ofr of Route 647 and out of traffic. Review Time .50 hr ~ ' - . uouyias A, xzracore Fire Marshal 1111 , ' I rp.' • 4 October 31, 1990 Mr. Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS Re: Auto Laundry Stephens City Site SCIENTISTS 17555.076 Dear Evan: We have reviewed the submission of this site plan of a new Auto Laundry site in the Stephens City area. They have addressed many of the comments that we brought up in our review of the first site proposed off of Rte. 522, north of Winchester. Our comments from the review of this site plan are as follows: A. ACCESS ISSUES: 1. The access to Rte. 647 is adequate; however, it would be preferable to limit the access point to either one entrance or to coordinate the proposed entrances with the south entrance in and the north access out of the site. All of the traffic flow alternatives combined with the vacuum cleaner stations between the entrances and the close proximity with the adjacent entrance to the dental office will make for a confusing entrance scheme along a road that is seeing increased traffic loadings. I suggest that: a) as a minimum, the two access points be limited (designed for) one-way traffic flow; b) the vacuums indicated in the front be place towards the rear of the site. B. GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT: 1. The proposed stormwater management plan for this site appears to be adequate. Although the method used in developing the hydrograph for estimating the detention volume required does not take into account the critical storm duration for the design storm that would generate the maximum volume, there appears to be an adequate factor of safety to accommodate additional storage on -site before it overflows into the right-of-way via the south entrance. ■ 11240 Waples Mill Road Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Telefaz 703.385.8319 • 2. The fill slopes along the southern property line are approximately 1 to 1. This is typically too steep for stability. My greatest concern is where it approaches the drainage inlet. Approximately 50 to 100-feet to the east of the R/W very little drainage would impact this fall and it should be ok if sodded. In reference to my comment Al, the entrance could be narrowed to 20-feet if it is revised to a one-way "entrance" only and to 30-feet if it remains a two-way access. This will also allow the slopes to be reduced to 3 to 1. The grate of the inlet could be raised and additional fill material placed in the sump to reduce the slopes. An off -site construction nkcFirrF- ,s easement or letter of permission would be required. Since the properties are under common ownership, this should not be difficult to do. 3. I suggest that the discharge of the culvert under the north entrance be placed more to the center of the island for better slope distribution. Otherwise, the rip -rap should be granted in the area where the slope exceeds 3 to 1. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN: 1. An E&S plan showing proposed measures accompanied by a narrative was made a part of this submission. The plan appears to be adequate for this site. Based on the above comments, I feel the following items need to be addressed for final approval: J1 Revise the to the to the Op� entrance plan site eliminate northern access and use the southern access as the site entrance and exit; or use the northern access as an exit only with the southern access as an entrance only. 2. Consider the relocation of the front vacuum stations to the rear. 3. Reduce the fill slopes on the south property line from the right-of-way to 50-feet to the east, and in the front center island. Mr. Evan Wyatt October 31, 1990 Page 2 Cl If you have any questions please let me know. In general, I found the plan to be good. The concerns for the entrances are somewhat subjective. I feel that on a road that will be receiving the traffic counts and activity that this area will see, too many entrances will add confusion to turning movements and will slow down smooth traffic flow. I am open to your ideas on the subject. Sincerely, D oU ` ENGINEERS NOHU & ASSOCIA INC. ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS -- Paul A. Bernard, PE Project Manager PAB:mb cc: Bruce Edens - Greenway Engineering Mr. Evan Wyatt October 31, 1990 Page 3 0 11240 Waples Mill Road F-NO1Nk--[ R- Suite 100 ARCHiTerrs Fairfax, Virginia 22030 s< IFNIISIS 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement Auto Laundry, Stephens City Site I� Date: Oct.31, 1990 Please Reference: Project No. 17555 .076 Invoice No. 9008059 Client No. 07534 Principal .5 hrs @ 48.00 24.00 Project Manager 2.0 hrs @ 33.25 66.50 Senior Engineer 5.0 hrs @ 33.25 166.25 Admin. Assist 1.0 hrs @ 14.50 14.50 Total Direct 271.25 Total Indirect 406.88 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE $ 678.13 i�Z346e� 84 �o IVOV ]990 0 RIC11I/ O g oar-.