Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
013-91 Kraft-General Foods - Stonewall District - Backfile
►. i * STAFF SITE PLAN CHECKLIST * This application is not complete if the following are not included: 1. One set of comment sheets from the following agencies along with any marked copies of the plan; VDOT City of Winchester '' �Sanitation Authority Town of Stephens City Inspections Dept. Town of Middletown 1/ Fire Marshal Health Dept. County Engineer / Parks & Recreation Airport Authority ✓ Soil & Water Conservation Dist. 2. One copy of the Site Plan application. L,-"' 3. Five copies of the Site Plan. 4. One reproducible copy of the Site Plan (if required). 5. One 35mm. slide of the Site Plan (if required). TRACKING Date &1719 / Application received. All necessary agency comments received. 1� Fee Paid (amount Site Plan to Planning Commission via bi-monthly. Site Plan heard by Planning Commission (if required). Revisions received (if required). Date of approval. Info added to annual report diskette. IF A 4 PO QoX 11087 vA -W 3 -7 9 I 6IS'- 5"q(o — 2440 RECEIPT N? n23058 AMOUNT DUE $��gsd.or� ,AMOUNT PAID $�/ 9 so BALANCE DUE $ UD BY CASH 7 CHECK �11,5^ /66 OTHER Nf--.MG A. IL DE'J_�LOPMENT iru.GNLZ� I LR, VIRGINIA 2.601 DATE.__-�-. RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS THE SUM OF L FOR ✓! Zl4zt : /� l , tL/ .n l/ii AA G1 _ `5 e0 i BY _ ` Cam_ `T ✓ EC�C.�-.-4, DAY TIMERS RE 0110EA ►N. �pj' 1.:"F1i0iW N►U$4 RECEIPT AMOUNT DUE $ - ^� t:� /� $ , (� BALANCE tgE PAID BY CASH CHECK(\ OTHER ARL WINCHESTER, VIRGiNIA 22601 RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS THE SUM FOR LLi.A A 1� Y K C ,Jf G DATE LA�s o C5 (,-), � BY D m -�L If- \--- DAY TIMERS RE ORDER No J22t — P—IW n USA COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT 9 N. Loudoun Street, 2nd Floor Winchester, Virginia inia 22601 g Thomas W. Owens Douglas A. Kiracofe Director Fire Marshal February 25, 1993 American Automatic Sprinkler Systems, Inc. Attn: Allen Becker 10427 A Reisterstown Road Owings Mills, Maryland 21117-3593 Dear Mr. Becker, I've completed my review of the sprinkler plans submitted for the KFG Plant in Frederick County. The plans were drawn very well and were rather easy to review, thank you. There is one item I see which must be changed, that being the F.D.C. at column line I-J. All of the risers at Kraft as well as the hydrants around the building on the 10" main are charged by a free standing yard Siamese located near the valve pit on the north corner of the structure. For this reason, please eliminate the 2nd siamese at I-J. As stated on the plans all work must comply with applicable sections of NFPA 13 and NFPA 231. All inspector test and drains must terminate on the exterior of the building. As for testing, I'll witness the hydrostatic testing of piping at 200 PSI and walk the system at that time to look at piping and hangers. Prior to finals I'll have to witness a main drain test and see all hardware items in place such as spare head cabinet, hydraulic placards, etc. No overhead doors were shown on the plan so during field inspection I will check for coverage below door areas. Please field check this item while installing. As a matter of my records please forward cut sheets on valves, sprinkler heads, and hardware being used. Should you have any further questions, please let me know. Sinaere� / Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal DAK: i lc FL.a�.'_, = PP OVED cc.: File FIr't% n•5HA3 , FR.,�DE!'AiCr COUNTY DIRECTOR - (703) 665-5618 FIRE MARSHAL - (703) 665-6350 FAX - (703) 678-0682 7 JUN SV L' FIELD �. SITE PLAN APPLICATION DATE 6/4/91 APPLICATION # ! 3 -9 1 1. Development Name: KGF Beverage Plant 2. Location of Property: 20 Acres Northwest of Intersection of Park (by street name) Center Drive and West Brooke Road, Frederick Countv. Vireinia 3. Property owner: Kraft -General Foods Address: 250 North Street White Plains, NY 10625 Telephone: 914-335-607 1 4. Applicant/Agent: Sverdrup Corporation Address: 801 North Eleventh Street St. Louis, MO 63101, Attn: G. Cutter Telephone: 314-436-7600 5. Designer: Sverdrup Corporation Address: 801 North Eleventh Street St. Louis, MO 63101, Attn: G. Cutter Telephone; 314-436-7600 Contact; George Cutter 5 n U 6. Ic this an original or revised Site Plan? Original Revised _ x , 7. Total area of parcel Lo be.develvped: 8. Property Information: a) Tax Map. _ b) Parcel Number: c) Tax ID 0: d) Current Zoning: Ml a) Present Use: Pasture f) Proposed Use: Tndustrial- g) Adjoining Property Zoning: Ml. B3 h) Adjoining Property Uro: Tndustrial i) Magisterial District: ___ ..$tonewall Acres Err R JUN HELD I have read Lice material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. i also understand that all required material will he complete prior to the oubmis$ion of my site plan. Applicant's signature: 6 REVIEW COMMENTS - DEPARTMENT Or PLANNING 1. Zoning classification of site SVERDRUP COMPLIED DWG C-3 & COVER SHEET 2. Zoning of all ajoining properties SVERDRUP COMPLIED DWG C-3 3. Building restrication lines SVERDRUP COMPLIED DWG C-3 4. F.A.R. SVERDRUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 5. Height of all structures SVERDURUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 6. Any outdoor signs and size SVERDRUP SHOWS DWG C-4 7. Outdoor lighting SVERDRUP SHOWS DWG C-4 8. A linear sidewalk SVERDRUP COMPLIED DWG C-4 9. Complete address for Sverdrup SVERDRUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 10. Calculation describing parking spaces SVERDRUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 11. Calculations for handicap spaces SVERDRUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 12. Calculations for number of loading spaces SVERDRUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 13. Loading spaces to be 12 X 45' SVERDRUP COMPLIED COVER SHEET 14. Parking lot landscaping provides SVERDRUP COMPLIED NEW DRAWINGS 15. A landscaping plan SVERDRUP COMPLIED NEW DRAWING 16. Any natural features NONE 17. Sediment and erosion control SVERDRUP SUPPLIED 2 NEW DRAWINGS 18. Cul-de-sac not wide enough Sverdrup, Don Hornung called Evan Wyatt 5-31-91 to ask if two to three trucks a day would be influence this comment. Was told cul-de-sac would be acceptable if a note stating traffic was added; SVERDRUP ADDED Loading pad should be larger SVERDRUP SAME ACTION AS ABOVE 19. Concrete dumpster pad not large enough SVERDRUP COMPLIED WIDENED TO 12' Review Comments — V.D.O.T. Marked Prints and Letter 1. Service Road width throat increased to 54" with 50' tapers. SVERDRUP COMPLIED 2. Parking lot entrance throat increased to 34' with 25 radius 50' taper to north and lengthen right turn from entrance south to intersection. SVERDRUP COMPLIED. 3. Add half typical section SVERDRUP COMPLIED 4. Entrance pipe size and length to be changed SVERDRUP COMPLIED 5. Drainage along western side of Park Center is to be intercepted by roadside ditch and detention basin. Add note above liabilities. SVERDRUP COMPLIED 6. Proposed water and gas will be adjusted to accommodate wider service road entrance. SVERDRUP COMMENT Called Mr. Childress on 5/31/91 to discuss; Don Hornung asked if widening could be added to north there by leaving south edge straight and not changing water and gas also electrical and telephone duct bank. He felt lie could accept this. Informed Mr. Childress that proposed traffic would be approlimately 3 truck a day. 7. Enclosed specifications SVERDRUP ADDED DETAIL Cover sheet add Route numbers SVERDRUP COMPLIED DWLC-3 Change culvert size under West Brook Road SVERDRUP CHANGED NOTE West Brook Road 60' RW SVERDRUP ADDED NOTE Increase truck entrance to 54' SVERDRUP COMPLIED Add conduits under roads SVERDRUP CHANGED DWGC-8 TO curb and gutter typical add Std CG-6 SVERDRUP COMPLIED 1 jUN c �e Typical Section - Asphalt paving put asphalt down in two layers designate mixes to be used. SVERDRUP COMPLIED F;Ia.., APPLICANT'S CHECKLIST Your site plan should include the following: Administrative Information Y N = 1. Name of proposed development 2. Name and address of owner 3. Name and address of developer _✓ _ 4. Name, address, and phone number of designer 5. Certificate of surveyor, engineer, or architect 6. Date plan prepared and date of revisions 7. A listing of all conditions placed on the site as a result of a conditional use permit or conditional — zoning approval 8. A space labeled "approved by the Zoning Administrator" for the approval signature and date of approval General Site Information Y N _ 9. Location map (scale 1:2000) 7 _ 10. Magisterial District of site _✓ _ 11. Scale of site plan (not to exceed 1:50) 12. North Arrow 13. Zoning of site 14. Use and zoning of adjoining properties Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures Y N 15. Surveyed boundaries for all lots and parcels C-,j 16. Acreage of all lots included in the plan 17. The location and dimensions of all required setbacks and yard areas _ 18. Location of all buildings, structures, and uses _ 19. The proposed use of each building, structure, and area 20. The location and type of all dwelling units 21. Ground floor area and total floor area of all buildings with FAR calculations for commercial and industrial zoning districts 22. The height of all buildings and structures ? 23. The location and dimension of all signs 7 UJ Lots/Uses/Buildings & Structures (con't) Y N ?24. Location of outdoor lighting fixtures 25. Location and nature of outdoor storage areas TA 26. Location and area of common open space J_!1A 27. Location and description of all recreation facilities 28. Location of sidewalks and pedestrian ways 29. Location of outdoor trash receptacles Roads Y N 30. Name and number of existing and planned streets on and adjoi g the site 31. Location of existing and planned streets on and adjoining the site 32. Dimensions, boundaries, width, pavement, and construction of planned roads 33. Location and dimensions of all proposed entrances from public right-of-ways Utilities Y N 34. Location of all utilities, including sewer and water lines with the size of lines, mains, and laterals 35. Location and width of all easements, including access, utility and drainage easements 36. Location and nature of fire lanes, fire hydrants, and all other facilities necessary to meet the Fire Code requirements Parking Y N 37. Calculations describing the required number of parking and loading spaces 38. Location and dimensions of all parking and loading spaces, driveways, parking aisles, curbing, and / other features to be used ✓ _ 39. Location and dimension of all handicapped spaces 14 Natural Features Y N ✓ 40. Existing and finished contour lines _ 7_ 41. Location of steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, and other environmental features ✓ 42. Location of streams and drainage ways Landscaping Y N 43. Landscaping plan describing location and types of plants to be used OLA 44. Location of required buffers and screening with cross sections or profiles Erosion and Sediment Control Y N ✓ _ 45. A stormwater management plan with run off calculations and location and description of facilities to be used 46. Soil erosion and sedimentation control plan with location, types, and examples of provisions to be used 9 4p R k--, I t, S �I,F\ IJ-*CA P) Q C-5- I r 1 - 3'CRUSHE0 STONE RED 1,0 a J Q O W co 1 DOWN E,Y-- 4" W(bE Y LOW STRIPFS �APAR i I I OFFICE 1 �I I 9 0' I it LURB WALL P (CONCRETE) DOOR tt — 4" WIQ YELLOW STRIPES (TYPA _— _ I.... 64 �3 _ ' -SPA. rni * n- 1 f O _- 2 24' -,q _ 24' ,� _.. 24 24' lr _ 2- 9 ' ACES�- _._� IS _1 �n N L 25' R /`CURB (TYP.) AND GUTTER (TYP.) i-�fl w� o T2e:E - 15' R (TYP.) s ; 0 1 M !, d 1 tL S� 1 1 5' CURB OPENINGSI CURB NUS DOWN IN TOPICAL i' I 1. i�d 5' CURB - OPENING 1- ;; I. I r 1 .11 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 September 8, 1992 Sverdrup Corporation Attn: Mr. William J. Young 801 North Eleventh Street St. Louis, Missouri 63101 RE: Grading Plan For Kraft/General Foods. Dear Mr. Young: Our department received the narrative and engineered drawings for the proposed expansion of the Kraft/General Foods plant located in the Fort Collier Industrial Park. I have forwarded this information to Mr. H.E. Strawsnyder, Frederick County Engineer, for his review. As we discussed during our meeting, once Mr. Strawsnyder has reviewed the grading plans and provided our department with an approval letter for this plan, we will issue a land disturbance permit for this project. The land disturbance permit applicant will need to make arrangements to submit the appropriate permit fee and sign the required forms kept in our department. I hope this information is of assistance. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: H.E. Strawsnyder, Frederick County Engineer 9 North Loudoun Street Winchester, VA 22601 P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22604 -1k 0 C O R P O R A T I O N 0 801 North Eleventh Street 314 436-7600 St. Louis, Missouri 63101-1000 LETTER NO. SC-1 1901-VO4 September 4, 1992 Mr. Evan A. Wyatt Planner II County of Frederick Department of Planning and Development 9 N. Loudoun Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Mr. Wyatt: Please find the documents necessary for yow- approval in fulfilling our Application for Land Disturbance Permit for the planned expansion at the Kraft General Foods Plant. We are sending the narrative addressing :ill chick points noted in the Erosion and Sediment Control Application Package. Also included are three drawings explaining plans and associated details. -1Ve have also included a copy of our Construction Specifications related to .grading activities. We welcome your review and comments. I will follow-up with a call on Tuesday afternoon regarding our status, application tees and future plans. Your cooperation and assistance is apprecitared. Sincerely, SVERDRUP CORPORATION Bill in Project Manager Enclosures c: D. Horning B. Martin PF 11901 i COUNTY of FREDERICK i Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/ 678-0682 October 10, 1991 Dear Mr. Cutter: This letter regards my inspection of the Kraft/General Foods site located in Fort Collier Industrial Park. You requested the inspection in order to receive a Temporary Certificate of Occupancy Permit for the office portion of this project. Once the Building Official and the Fire Marshal inform me that their inspections will allow this, I will sign -off on the Temporary C.O. for this use. Prior to obtaining a Final Certificate of Occupancy Permit, the following items need to be completed: 1) All landscaping needs to be planted. 2) Loading entrance needs yellow striping. 3) All loading spaces need yellow striping. 4) Final grade needs to be established on site. 5) All denuded areas need to be revegetated and stabilized. 6) All culverts and inlets need final cleanout. 7) All construction debris needs to be removed and disposed of properly. You need to contact this department to schedule a final inspection once the above list has been completed. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this letter. Sincerely, L. 0, • L Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: John Trenary, Building Official Doug Kiracofe, Fire Marshal THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 FRxEO 4-1 -91 SK F-J' It copy COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703 / 678-0682 April 1, 1991 Mr. Steve Lucus P.O. Box 11087 Knoxville, TN 37919 RE: General Foods Footer Foundation Permit. Dear Mr. Lucus: This letter regards the request of Mr. James Effler to obtain a footer foundation permit for the General Foods project in Fort Collier Industrial Park. The purpose of this correspondence is to clarify the requirements related to plans review and project construction in Frederick County, Virginia. All proposed uses in our industrial zones require site plan approval prior to construction. This allows for all review agencies to insure that the site plan meets all code and ordinance requirements. Frederick County understands that plans review, although necessary, should not prevent the preparation of a site for future construction. This phase of construction has been accomplished through the review of a site grading plan and the issuance of a land disturbance permit. The next phase of construction concerns the issuance of a footer foundation permit. The structural plans for this have been reviewed, a notarized statement signed by Mr. Effler stating that you will proceed at your own risk and expense has been filed and a permit to pour the footers has been applied for. I will sign - off on this permit; however, I want to insure that you are aware of the existing situation before you proceed. The only plan that has been provided to this department shows the footprint of the proposed structure. This structure is located 400 feet from Park Center Drive and 200 feet from West Brooke Road. This exceeds the seventy-five (75) foot setback requirement for this type of zoning; however, it does not take into account the area needed for parking and maneuvering, loading and receiving, fire lanes, stormwater management facilities, easements or other improvements that could require additional area. In short, I want you to insure that the placement of this structure will not need to be altered after the footers have been poured. This structure is over three (3) acres in area and would require a great amount of time and money to relocate the structure down the road. 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Frederick County will continue to work closely with General Foods to' insure that construction continues to move forward. As previously stated, I will sign -off on the footer foundation permit. If General Foods feels that it is prudent to pour footers at this time, then we would encourage you to do so; however, this will be the last construction permit we are authorized to sign until final site plan approval is received. I can not provide you with an estimate of the time involved for site plan approval, as this department has not received any information to date. I hope this letter is beneficial to your work. The intent of this letter is to alert you to possible events, not to discourage you from proceeding as planned. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter or be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: Mr. Kenneth Y. Stiles, Chairman - Board of Supervisors Mr. John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator Mr. James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman - Planning Commission Mrs. June Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Mr. Robert W. Watkins, Planning Director Mr. Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director of Code Administration Mr. James L. McIlvaine, Jr. � nee ' I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703 / 678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Site Plan Review Agencies FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II SUBJECT: General Foods Site Plan DATE: April 3, 1991 Mr. George Cutter of Sverdrup Corporation will be in Winchester on Wednesday, April 10, 1991 to discuss requirements related to the General Foods project. Your attendance at this meeting would be beneficial to the development of this project. The meeting will be held in the conference room in the Planning and Development Department at 9:30 a.m. Please let me know if you have any questions or are not able to attend. 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 104 • • COUNTY of FREDERICK i Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 FAX 703 / 678-0682 May 20, 1991 Sverdrup Corporation Attn: Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager 801 North Eleventh St. Louis, Mo. 63101 RE: Kraft General Foods Site Plan Review. Dear Mr. Cutter: I have completed my first review of the Kraft General Foods site plan submitted to my office on May 13, 1991. The revised site plan needs to address my comments, as well as all other review agency comments before we can recommend final site plan approval. It would be to your benefit to wait until all review agency comments have been received, and then proceed with a comprehensive revision of your plan. Once this has been accomplished, each review agency will need to check your revisions and provide me with approved comments. Please provide each review agency with the appropriate number of copies they require (I will need four (4)). Please insure that all copies are blue line copies. The photocopied site plans that were submitted are not legible and require additional time to decipher. I will attempt to address my concerns in narrative form. My comments reflect the items not adequately covered on the applicants checklist. If you have any questions pertaining to my comments, or if you would like a marked -up copy, please contact me so I may assist you. I offer the following comments: 1) The zoning classification of the developed site needs to be listed. 2) The zoning and use of all adjoining properties (in and out of Ft. Collier Industrial Park) needs to be listed. 3) All building restriction lines should be shown. 4) The ground floor area, total floor area and Floor Area Ratio calculations need to be provided. 5) The height of all structures needs to be listed. 6) If there are any outdoor signs on the property, the THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Page -2- G. Cutter Ltr. May 20, 1991 location and dimensions need t6be provided. 7) If there are any outdoor lighting fixtures on the property, please show their location. 8) A linear sidewalk needs to be provided along the 297' serving the first row of parking spaces. This sidewalk needs to be accessible by handicapped persons through the installation of handicapped ramps. 9) The complete address for Sverdrup should be provided on the cover sheet for future reference and contact. 10) Calculations describing the required number of parking spaces and the provided number of parking spaces needs to be listed. 11) Calculations describing the required number of handicapped spaces and the provided number of handicapped spaces needs to be listed. 12) Calculations describing the required number of loading spaces and the provided number of loading spaces needs to be listed. 13) Section 3-3-3.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires all loading spaces to be 12' x 45' in dimension. 14) Parking lot landscaping needs to be provided in accordance with sections 3-3-2.11.1 and 3-3-2.11.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. I have included an example of how this should be achieved. 15) A landscaping plan needs to be provided to show the location and type of all plants that will be used. 16) If any natural features are on site or within close proximity to the site, they need to be identified. This includes steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, streams and drainageways. 17) There are no provisions for sediment and erosion control measures. Our department handles this type of requirement; therefore, our inspector needs the location of these measures for inspection purposes.- 18) The cul-de-sac servicing the fructose tanks, chiller pad and resin silo pad is not wide enough to accommodate two-way tractor -trailer traffic. We will base our width Page -3- G. Cutter Ltr. May 20, 1991 requirements on the entrance recommendation from VDOT. The two (2) loading pads serving this area should also be 12' x 45' in dimension. 19) The concrete dumpster pad is not wide enough to allow for the refuse trucks to utilize it. The required amount of loading spaces is less than you have shown on the plan; therefore, I feel that more width can be provided to insure that the retaining wall and curb do not get damaged. 20) If Kraft General Foods plans on specifying parking for administrative use or VIP use, it should be shown on the site plan. As stated previously, all review agency comments must be approved prior to final site plan approval. I still need a site plan application that has all required information, four (4) blue line copies of the revised site plan, and the required site plan application fee of $1,950.00 before I can recommend approval. Good communication channels are imperative at this stage of our review process, so please contact me if you have any questions about requirements, review procedures, contact persons or this letter. Sincerely, L Q. I*- Evan . Wyatt Planner II EAW/slk enclosure cc: John R. Riley, Jr., County Administrator June Wilmot, Economic Development Executive Director Bob Childress, Assistant Resident Engineer, VDOT John Whitacre, Sanitation Engineer Dough Kiracofe, Fire Marshal John Trenary, Director of Code Administration Boyd Pitcock, Design Review Specialist Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineer Services Thomas L. Neal, Construction Engineer Don McIlvaine COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 July 23, 1991 Kraft General Foods Attn: Mr. Mitch Litski 250 North Street White Plains, NY 10625 RE: Kraft General Foods Site Plan. Dear Mr. Litski: The Frederick County Planning Department administratively approved Site Plan #013-91 of Kraft General Foods on July 15, 1991. This plan calls for the construction of a 126,000 square foot beverage plant, a 10,500 square foot office building, a paved parking lot complete with curb and gutter, 219 regular parking spaces, 7 handicapped parking spaces, interior and perimeter landscaping, and a 375 foot linear sidewalk along the front portion of the parking lot for pedestrian access, a paved area on the south side of the plant complete with 19 tractor trailor parking spaces, 6 loading areas, and -a 141x 30' concrete dumpster pad, a paved cul-de-sac area on the north side of the plant complete with concrete truck and tank unloading pads, a chiller pad, a resin silo pad, and dike and fructose tanks, a stormwater detention area including an oil separator pit, and all erosion and sediment control measures. Enclosed is a copy of the approved site plan for your records. The Kraft General Foods Site Plan was approved with two outstanding engineer comments. These comments reflect the oil separator pit and the three-inch hole located by the outlet box and riser section. It is my understanding that these comments can be addressed easily by your staff. I will need to receive correspondence from Mr. H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services to close out this file. I will contact Mr. Strawsnyder regarding this matter. The final approval of this site plan enables Kraft General Foods to proceed with all permitting for this project. It is your responsibility to schedule all inspections for this project. I will be available to conduct my site inspection at your convenience. If the plant and office are complete prior to the conclusion of all required site work, we will make provisions for your company to receive a Temporary Occupancy Permit. Once all required site work is finished, we will provide Kraft General Foods with a Final Certificate of Occupancy Permit. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 0 9 Kraft General Foods Letter July 23, 1991 page -2- I hope this letter answers any questions you may have regarding the completion of this project. Please contact me if I may answer any questions regarding this letter or if I may be of any assistance. Sincerely, E', a Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmont, Economic Development Executive Director H. Edward Strawsnyder, Director of Engineering Services John T-renary, Director of Code Administration Thomas L. Neal, Construction Engineer Don McIlvaine l'r COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/667-0370 February 27, 1991 Howard Shockey & Sons, Inc. Attn: Mr. Fred Ash P.O. Box 2530 Winchester, VA 22601 RE: General Foods, Inc. Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Dear Fred: I have completed my review of the erosion and sediment control plan for the General Foods project proposed for Fort Collier Industrial Park. The overall concept and design of this plan is consistent with the requirements of the Virginia Erosion & Sediment Control Handbook, 2nd Edition and Chapter 8 (Erosion and Sedimentation Control) of the Frederick County Code; therefore, I will recommend approval of this plan. I have specific concerns with this plan due to its proximity to Red Bud Run. I offer the following comments: 1) I estimate that 7.3 acres of this 20 acre site will be graded. Although the grading in this area will be minimal, a strategic area should be located for stockpiling fill material and topsoil. This area should be located away from the swale that runs to Red Bud Run and protected with silt fence at a minimum. 2) It appears that approximately 1/3 of the area to be graded falls within soil types classified as Frederick Poplimento Rock Outcrop Complex and Opequon-Chilhowie Silty Clays (Very Rocky). These soils generally contain large quantities of limestone and dolomite that will most likely be excavated. This practice may require additional erosion control measures as the project progresses. 3) Stormwater management and drainage calculations will be required at a later date. Any additional grading resulting from this will have to be worked out at the site plan stage. Please make arrangements to obtain a land disturbance permit from our department. I will be available to assist you with this permit and answer any questions regarding this stage of your project. 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 E 11 If you or any concerned party have any questions regarding the erosion and sediment control plan or this letter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, 6-ri . Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II EAW cc: Mr. Kenneth Y. Stiles, Chairman, Board of Supervisors Mr. Charles W. Orndoff, Sr. Stonewall District Supervisor Mr. John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator Mr. James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman, Planning Commission Mrs. June Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Mr. James L. McIlvaine, Sr. Mr. Thomas Neal, Sverdrup & Parcel Consultants, Inc. Mr. H. Bruce Edens, Greenway Engineering 0 LJ M E M O R A N D U M TO: All Review Agencies FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II 'l3 RE: Kraft General Foods Site Plan DATE: May 14, 1991 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 Kraft General Foods will be submitting site plans to your respective department today. This site plan should be reviewed and all revisions listed. I am asking that all review agencies fax their comment sheets with all required revisions to Sverdrup Corporation and provide me with a copy for my file. This information should be sent to: Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager Sverdrup Corporation St. Louis, Missouri 63101 Phone: 1-314-436-7600 Fax: 1-314-436-2959 If you have any questions, please contact me. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 M E M O R A N D U M TO: All Review Agencies FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II RE: General Foods Site Plan DATE: May 9, 1991 All agencies will probably be receiving site plans for the General Foods project within the next few days. These site plans should reflect the comments all review agencies made to Mr. George Cutter of Sverdrup, Inc. during our meeting of April 10, 1991. Construction for this project related to footers and piers has commenced and is close to completion. This is the last phase of construction that is permitted until final site plan approval has been granted. In order to avoid a time lag between the approval of this site plan and recommencement of construction work, I am asking that all review agencies make this site plan review their top priority. If your first review requires revisions, please create a punch list of all items to be addressed so we may fax this information to Sverdrup, Inc. This will enable Sverdrup to revise the site plan and resubmit it to each agency for final approval. I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause your department; however, we are looking for a quick turn around to enable the Planning Staff to take this plan to the Planning Commission. If you receive any inquiry regarding the time table involved for this review, please refer the interested party to John R. Riley, Jr., at (703) 665-5653 or (703) 665-5666. Please contact me if I may answer any questions (703) 665-5651. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 9 t•.J i COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 TELECOPIER/FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE DATE: JuwE 7-4 I1?9 1 TRANSMITTAL TIME: PLEASE DELIVER THIS PAGE(S) IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: M ez• C m ,F_ CzTrL-12 P16j OCT— 0 R-Q A-,fs COMPANY: &C- 9Z910 P 1G MO R-ft_n o t`1 CITY, STATE: �i". �OJIS . M TELEC OPIER # 314 / 4 3 6 % 2_95j RE: _ Kam- Cs�w_i c Toops 5rrE- P�.� TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER LETTER: _ 3 - MESSAGE: Puzf c- eor j—\r'-e-T 4-y Gu DTI 613S 6,:F ICt D= You flA-VE FROM: �-:VAt3 A . W y - PHONE: (/703) 6(.S —SAS I TELECOPIER /FAX NUMBER: (703) 678-0682 THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 0 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 June 24, 1991 Sverdrup Corporation Attn: Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager 801 North Eleventh Street St. Louis, Missouri 63101 RE: Kraft General Foods Site Plan Review. Dear Mr. Cutter: This correspondence regards my second review of the above mentioned site plan.- All of the comments from my May 20, 1991 site plan review have been addressed by your office with the exception of the landscaping plan. The overall concept of the landscaping plan (sheet L-1) is fine; however, the entire perimeter of the parking lot needs to show one (1) shade tree per forty (40) feet of linear footage distance. I believe that this can be accomplished easily by your draftsmen who should revise this sheet and provide me with a final draft of this plan. The site plan application, review fee and revised site plans have been submitted to this office, and official files for this project have been created. I have received an approved comment from the Building Inspections Department, and will need to receive approved comments from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), the Frederick County Sanitation Authority, the Frederick County Fire Marshal, and the Frederick County Engineer before I can give final site plan approval to this project. I suggest that you wait for all agencies to provide you with comments from their second review before you resubmit plans to this office. This will enable you to address any comment necessary, and submit the final round of site plans to Frederick County. Once all site plan review agencies have provided you with approved comment sheets, a final site plan package needs to be submitted to this department. This final package should include all approved review agency comment sheets, any marked -up plans, and four (4) copies of the final site plan. Once this is achieved, I will send a copy of the approved site plan to Kraft General Foods, Sverdrup, and keep two (2) approved site plans with our files. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 I hope this correspondence is beneficial to your project. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter, please contact me. Sincerely, L161 Q . W Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator June M. Wilmot, Economic Development Executive Director Bob Childress, Assistant Resident Engineer, VDOT John Whitacre, Frederick County Sanitation Authority Engineer Doug Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshal John Trenary, Director of Code Administration Boyd Pitcock, Design Review Specialist Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineer Services Thomas L. Neal, Construction Engineer Don McIlvaine 0 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK TELECOPIER/FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE DATE: May 20, 1991 TRANSMITTAL TIME: PLEASE DELIVER THIS PAGE(S) IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: Mn.. Geonge CutteA, Pno9 ect Manag eA COMPANY: Svelydtcup CanpofLati.an CITY, STATE: St. Lou ins, Masaun.i. TELECOPIER # : 314143612959 RE: Site Ptan Review Pan Kna4t GeneAat Food1s TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER LETTER: -5 MESSAGE: Ptease contact this department i4 you have quation/s. FROM: Evan A. Wyatt PtanneA 11 TELECOPIER/FAX r: (703)667-0370 (703) 665-5651 PHONE: 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • • May 20, 1991 Sverdrup Corporation Attn: Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager 801 North Eleventh St. Louis, Mo. 63101 RE: Kraft General Foods Site Plan Review. Dear Mr. Cutter: COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703 / 678-0682 I have completed my first review of the Kraft General Foods site plan submitted to my office on May 13, 1991. The revised site plan needs to address my comments, as well as all other review agency comments before we can recommend final site plan approval. It would be to your benefit to wait until all review agency comments have been received, and then proceed with a comprehensive revision of your plan. Once this has been accomplished, each review agency will need to check your revisions and provide me with approved comments. Please provide each review agency with the appropriate number of copies they require (I will need four (4)). Please insure that all copies are blue line copies. The photocopied site plans that were submitted are not legible and require additional time to decipher. I will attempt to address my concerns in narrative form. My comments reflect the items not adequately covered on the applicants checklist. If you have any questions pertaining to my comments, or if you would like a marked -up copy, please contact me so I may assist you. I offer the following comments: ✓1) The zoning classification of the developed site needs to be listed. ✓2) The zoning and use of all adjoining properties (in and out of Ft. Collier Industrial Park) needs to be listed. ✓3) All building restriction lines should be shown. ✓4) The ground floor area, total floor area and Floor Area Ratio calculations need to be provided. / ✓5) The height of all structures needs to be listed. ,�6) If there are any outdoor signs on the property, the THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 • • Page -2- G. Cutter Ltr. May 20, 1991 location and dimensions need to be provided. ✓7) If there are any outdoor lighting fixtures on the property, please show their location. 1/8) A linear sidewalk needs to be provided along the 297' serving the first row of parking spaces. This sidewalk needs to be accessible by handicapped persons through the installation of handicapped ramps. /9) The complete address for Sverdrup should be provided on the cover sheet for future reference and contact. A10) Calculations describing the required number of parking spaces and the provided number of parking spaces needs to be listed. ✓11) Calculations describing the required number of handicapped spaces and the provided number of handicapped spaces needs to be listed. /2) Calculations describing the required number of loading spaces and the provided number of loading spaces needs to be listed. ✓13) Section 3-3-3.3 of the Zoning Ordinance requires all loading spaces to be 12' x 45' in dimension. 14) Parking lot landscaping needs to be provided in accordance with sections 3-3-2.11.1 and 3-3-2.11.2 of the Zoning Ordinance. I have included an example of how this should be achieved. ✓15) A landscaping plan needs to be provided to show the location and type of all plants that will be used. 16) If any natural features are on site or within close CHIP proximity to the site, they need to be identified. This includes steep slopes, woodlands, floodplains, wetlands, sinkholes, streams and drainageways. V17) There are no provisions for sediment and erosion control measures. Our department handles this type of requirement; therefore, our inspector needs the location of these measures for inspection purposes. GN, 18) The cul-de-sac servicing the fructose tanks, chiller pad and resin silo pad is not wide enough to accommodate two-way tractor -trailer traffic. We will base our width Page -3- G. Cutter Ltr. May 20, 1991 requirements on the entrance recommendation from VDOT. The two (2) loading pads serving this area should also be 12' x 45' in dimension. ✓19) The concrete dumpster pad is not wide enough to allow for the refuse trucks to utilize it. The required amount of loading spaces is less than you have shown on the plan; therefore, I feel that more width can be provided to insure that the retaining wall and curb do not get damaged. CAN 20) If Kraft General Foods plans on specifying parking for administrative use or VIP use, it should be shown on the site plan. As stated previously, all review agency comments must be approved prior to final site plan approval. I still need a site plan application that has all required information, four (4) blue line copies of the revised site plan, and the required site plan application fee of $1,950.00 before I can recommend approval. Good communication channels are imperative at this stage of our review process, so please contact me if you have any questions about requirements, review procedures, contact persons or this letter. Sincerely, Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW/slk enclosure cc: John R. Riley, Jr., County Administrator June Wilmot, Economic Development Executive Director Bob Childress, Assistant Resident Engineer, VDOT John Whitacre, Sanitation Engineer Dough Kiracofe, Fire Marshal John Trenary, Director of Code Administration Boyd Pitcock, Design Review Specialist Ed Strawsnyder, Director of Engineer Services Thomas L. Neal, Construction Engineer Don McIlvaine r_� COUNTY of FREDERICK TELECOPIER/FAX TRANSMITTAL PAGE DATE: April 1, 1991 TRANSMITTAL TIME: PLEASE DELIVER THIS PAGE(S) IMMEDIATELY TO: NAME: COMPANY: - Rentenba .h Constructors CITY, STATE: Knoxville, TN 37919 TELECOPIER 615/524/1716 RE: General Foods Project TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING THIS COVER LETTER: -3- MESSAGE: Please call if you have any questions. FROM. E. Wyatt, Frederick Co. Planning PHONE: 703/665/5651 TELECOPIER/FAX r : ( 703) -�ZbY7-�p 678-0682 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 ,i FA-�Eo 4--1-9 S`C F-� I e copy COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 April 1, 1991 Mr. Steve Lucus P.O. Box 11087 Knoxville, TN 37919 RE: General Foods Footer Foundation Permit. Dear Mr. Lucus: This letter regards the request of Mr. James Eff ler to obtain a footer foundation permit for the General Foods project in Fort Collier Industrial Park. The purpose of this correspondence is to clarify the requirements related to plans review and project construction in Frederick County, Virginia. All proposed uses in our industrial zones require site plan approval prior to construction. This allows for all review agencies to insure that the site plan meets all code and ordinance requirements. Frederick County understands that plans review, although necessary, should not prevent the preparation of a site for future construction. This phase of construction has been accomplished through the review of a site grading plan and the issuance of a land disturbance permit. The next phase of construction concerns the issuance of a footer foundation permit. The structural plans for this have been reviewed, a notarized statement signed by Mr. Effler stating that. you will proceed at your own risk and expense has been filed and a permit to pour the footers has been applied for. I will sign - off on this permit; however, I want to insure that you are aware of the existing situation before you proceed. The only plan that has been provided to this department shows the footprint of the proposed structure. This structure is located 400 feet from Park Center Drive and 200 feet from West Brooke Road. This exceeds the seventy-five (75) foot setback requirement for this type of zoning; however, it does not take into account the area needed for parking and maneuvering, loading and receiving, fire lanes, stormwater management facilities, easements or other improvements that could require additional area. In short, I want you to insure that the placement of this structure will not need to be altered after the footers have been poured. This structure is over three (3) acres in area and would require a great amount of time and money to relocate the structure down the road. 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Frederick County will continue to work closely with General Foods to insure that construction continues to move forward. As previously stated, I will sign -off on the footer foundation permit. If General Foods feels that it is prudent to pour footers at this time, then we would encourage you to do so; however, this will be the last construction permit we are authorized to sign until final site plan approval is received. I can not provide you with an estimate of the time involved for site plan approval, as this department has not received any information to date. I hope this letter is beneficial to your work. The intent of this letter is to alert you to possible events, not to discourage you from proceeding as planned. If I may answer any questions regarding this letter or be of any assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, E-1 a. L�O_ Evan A. Wyatt Planner II EAW cc: Mr. Kenneth Y. Stiles, Chairman - Board of Supervisors Mr. John R. Riley, Jr., Frederick County Administrator Mr. James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman - Planning Commission Mrs. June Wilmot, Director of Economic Development Mr. Robert W. Watkins, Planning Director Mr. Kenneth L. Coffelt, Director of Code Administration Mr. James L. McIlvaine, Jr. JUL 0 S 1991 REVIEW COMMENTS V.D.O.T. 1. Taper section on truck access drive needs to be 50' SV LRR U ' CORP. FIELD OFFICE SVERDRUP - The taper is indicated as 50' typical on C-5 will add additional note at north side of drive. 2. C - 3 a. Location outfall pipe from oil separator JUL _ 51991 SVERDRUP - Oil separator and outfall placed on C-3 & C-5I Lj b. Consider increasing width at dumpster pad SVERDRUP - Was previously increased from 10' to 12' will increase to 14'. 3. C - 5 a. Show location of outfall pipe from oil separator SVERDRUP - Oil separator and outfall elevators shown on C-5 b. Provide hydraulic calculations for piping feeding oil separator. SVERDRUP - Hydrologists decided to increase flow. Calculations furnished. 4. C - 8 a. Provide pavement calculations for concrete & bituminous sections SVERDRUP - Calculation furnished b. Provide calculations to substantiate use at ##5 dowels SVERDRUP - No calculaton - size and number increased. 5. C - 10 a. Provide a detail to clarify note concerning temporary sediment cleanout and overflow structure. SVERDRUP - Shown on C-9 b. Indicate requirements for anchoring riser SVERDRUP - Concrete anchor shown on C -�-per plate 1.26n Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook DRAWINGS: C-3 C-5 C-8 C-9 C-10 Calculations: Sewer Hydral�uic to oil -water separator bituminous & concrete paving sections. SVERDRUP • JOB 11go- Y�F &,ka9e pk/11 — COMPUTATIONS FOR is SHEET NO. OF DATE 1911 - BY CHKD un mu i -� -:-iGL on tt 7- _.Q Av A1t.c41493 1 -• r— JUL I la 1 I - --- -- --;- - � - -1- - IL �- Sb¢hi _� 0 TztxS)_ lookAA dvcL_. lE1.D _ DFF1 so t ' = Z D F= Ia.5 F. rc 3 i I CzAlcre,a - — - - --- m -As�halc-c W c_ a �_X as a.s- - _ , I "CAA! Sic1�0!!./s ilt T �'r"kirP.J_( icref dim Jt'IoX, J?rrer1��--� --� � r, leud;�_ �:_�_sl�e!�k w�l _h�a _�'�� vo��.n•��lfian �� f�.�i _ 1 . I SVERDRUP /P JO© [ ` Wa -,"r" rage + l��f SHEET NO. OF DATE / t COMPUTATIONS FOR l ✓n+'� T►1i -'MESS BY CHKD SL't,\ 1-- I c�OG�f_�_�; u _his ; 1 I• per dt` -' -- Tit P+ -,- j K - *2 q d (ILI_ o_ J L - FIELF lC I � , ere es "A I , I i i I i i ----/� --: - 3-PA- --y i _i i I _ 3 Sm a� VOIC 001C e SGl(tACc = Jf ,. 3.?,s - --- i i s � s - - - , , i d¢ COnc(�� vcs__._ ��_re�u .« = iQ�t� �7PS(TVA .5 ,, 1 had r is le4f Yl 44I4141G concr,` z SjCY1. VV - ---- j_j6,kC n `, f°�e=(Y� '� -. �cxcccdfht ccohiMe;rtdafl'e,tS�i,ki+i� T41e-�3. ' • • MEMORANDUM TO: Don Hornung, Civil Section FROM: Robert Chantome, Geotechnical Section SUBJECT: Recommended Pavement Sections KGF Beverage Plant Winchester, Virginia July 1, 1991 E a 17 11 7� 7 JUL 0 5 1991 11 SVERDRUP CORP. FIELD OFFICE Calculations confirming the recommended car and truck pavement sections are attached. These calculations may be submitted to the city's Director of Engineering to satisfy his request. All our pavement sections are thicker than that specified in the Virginia Highway Research Council Design Guide. As an alternative to the asphaltic concrete pavement sections, the following Portland cement concrete pavements may be substituted. AREA entrance to car parking area car parking area truck loading area CC' Geotech 11412 CONCRETE BASE COURSE 811 411 611 411 911 411 • TABLE 3 • SLAB AND BASE THICKNESSES FOR DIFFERENT TRAFFIC CATEGORIES Design Traffic Slab Thickness Base Thickness (vpd) up to 400 401 - 750 751 to 3, 000 over 3,000 511 6" 71f 811 ctr nark; y 411* �r 611* *6 inches of soil cement could be substituted for 4 inches or 6 inches of base material. [EC� 72,0d E I JUL 0 5 1991 L S� LJP CORP. FIELD OFFICE - 15 - Nutc: 1) vial = vehicles Iwr (Iay in hutlt clirectiun:c. 2) VIe tliic:l:nc55 indu� (1)) is calcul.ltu(j, I)asctl on trul'lic in one direction, 3) i•'or design 1) greater thali 20, stage construction with D = 20 in the first stage may be provided. 4) he minimum value of D = 6.4 could ue reduced for service roads and for secondary roads with loss tlla1i 50 vehicles per day. or more 130 • � 1� — h 13 12 11— u' 10— > °' 9 —. LO a 8— a Q, cn a 6 — o GA 5 c� U 4 — u u 3— > 2 -- U) W 1 • 0 a) 30,000 tio� 20,000 10,000 ro ;; 6, 000 0 4,00.0 3, 000 ro� q 2, 000 q 1,000 0 00 200 100 750 Example: Given location — Craig County hence R. F. = 2. 0 Given Av. CBR = 6 therefore Design CBR = 2/3 x •6 = 4 Therefore SSV = Design C13R x R. F. = 2 x 4 = 8 Given Traffic = 400 ypd ('Total in both directions) Therefore we get D = 10.6 Also see pages 7, 8 and 9. 600 400—_.___ tm -V 0 cri = �C rn z --- Figure 3. Nomograph correlating the soil support value (SSV), traffic (vpd), and the thickness index (D) (based on AASHO Equ;ttion)for secondary roads. — 25.0 — 24.0 — 23.0 — 20.0 Maximum value — 19.0 — 18.0 — 17.0 — 16.0 — 15.0 — 14.0 13.0 T — 12.0 — 11.0 F — 10.0 Q 9.0 osr 8.0 7.0 6.4 Minimum value 6.0 • • [E ;S ;J V l5 T JUL 0 5 1991 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS - SANITARY AUTHORITY R fl svi:--jRUP CORP. COMMENT 1 - No storm/wash water into sanitary system FIELD OFFICE SVERDRUP - Call to reviewer on 6-20-91. Only the rain and dumpster leakage on the 14" X 30" pad will drain to sanitary as the pad is curbed.. 1di1L-be______ acceptable. COMMENT 2 - Move hatch opening on Meter pit JUL _ 51991 SVERDRUP - Will move COMMENT 3 - Need detail of flume size & equipment in it SVERDRUP - 10" parshall flume installed this contract, instrument and controls in an other construction package, see reference 9099-660; E54 drawing COMMENT 4 - Sparling FT 400-1110 ultra sonic open channel, etc. SVERDRUP - See answer to comment 3. COMMENT 5 - 10" PVC Min .32% grade. SVERDRUP - grade as written is ft/ft will clarify COMMENT 6 - 6" PVC min 1% grade SVERDRUP - See comment 5 COMMENT 7 - Bedding under pipe 6" SVERDRUP - Will increase COMMENT 8 - Same as comment 7 COMMENT 9 - Detector meter to be MFM it/MHR SVERDRUP will correct DRAWINGS: C-5 C-7 C-8 E-54 0- L SVERDRUP SHEET Nfl R JOB — , , / , LF "e-s DATE 7-7/ COMPUTATIONS FOR fdy f;p(-, e r cl�l - BY D P f/7 - SVIE!RdRop co FTEL D diI C E - -Fe �V' r k-,w �v aits i?lr� -zf- -aolls-e- 12 Dio sw Ict I A e4A ir 4r ILA' Af • 19 co, 7s- xs, 0�0, 5Z7s rr.y- -fiA- q,5 0, lqo �qo 0, 6 -7 A • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS 703/665-5651 FAX 703/667-0370 Lord Fairfax Soil and Water Conservation District 2045-B Valley Avenue (703) 662-3312 The Soil and Water Conservation Office is located at 2045-B Valley Ave, Winchester, Va. if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Sverdrup Corporation y y 801 North llth Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-436-7600 Attn: George Cutter, Project Manager Name of development and/or description of the request: KGF Beverage Plant Winchester, Virginia Location: Fort Collier Industrial Park 20 Acres North West of intersection of Park Center Drive and West Brooke Road, Frederick County, Virginia Soil and Water Conservation Comments: SEE ATTACHMENT Signature & Date (NOTICE - PLEASE . .. NOTICE TO -/APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as Possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. 9 (- 0 1 T r t < n- . r n ,- . COMMONWEALTH of V IRGINIA LORD FAIRFAX SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2045-B Valley Avenue Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 662-3312 May 30, 1991 MD -LORAN D UM TO: Ed Strawsnyder, County Engineer, Frederick Co. FROM: James A. Hepner, Cons_ Specialist, LFSWCD RE: KGF Beverage Plant Lord Fairfax Soil and Water Conservation District comments on the KFG Beverage Plant construction in Fort Collier Industrial Park, Winchester, Virginia. Stormwater management appears to be adequately addressed and supported by good mathematical calculations. Cover or "c" factors are realistic for pre and post construction cover conditions_ The proposed use of an oil seperator in the detention basin most likely to receive pollutants is an excellant and necessary measure_ The topography of the site indicates that drainage will be generally around and away from the geological depressions on the easterly side of the project. Stormwater flow after construction appears to be released at or less than the pre -construction 2 year storm event. Culverts all appear to handle the 10 year storm events. The total construction area is relatively flat- Erosion and sediment control measures for the project should be relatively simple to plan. The basic deficiency with the plan submitted for comments to the Conservation District is that there is no formal Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as prescribed by Virginia State Law. Most sorely missing is a narrative following the guidelines set forth in the VA. Erosion Handbook, Chapter 6_ Most importantly missing is the 1) soils information, 2) description of adjacent areas, 3) erosion and sediment control measures, 4) • 0 Memorandum Ed Strawsnyder May 30, 1991 2 permanent stabilization, and 5) maintenance of sediment and control structures. All the above listed requirements are shown on the checklist sheet on page VI -II of the Virginia E & S Handbook. A map labeled "E & S Plan" should be included in the plan showing locations of E & S practices with appropriate identification symbols and an accompanying legend. In -as -much as the project is well under construction and the previous positive points are well considered concerning the stormwater manage- ment aspect of the plan and the favorable lay of the land cessation of work on the project would not be recommended or necessary. However, a proper E & S Control Plan would be appropriate if a totally acceptable plan were to be desired by Frederick County. I would like to add that Tom Tanveer, and Walter have been most helpful and cooperative with us in comment process and expressed a willingness to do necessary to comply with the erosion and sediment requirements. d0aimes A. Hepner nservation Specialist Lord Fairfax SWCD CC. Frank Sherwood, Dir., Frederick Co., LFSWCD Sverdrup Corporation File of Sverdrup Corporation, this pre -review whatever is control 0 0 LORD FAIRFAX SOIL & WATER CONSERVATION DIRECT COMMENTS Formal erosion and sediment control plan SVERDRUP COMPLIED Narrative following guidelines SVERDRUP COMPLIED 1. Soil information 2. Description of adjacent areas 3. Erosion and sediment control measures 4. Permanent stabilization 5. Maintenance of sediment and control structures SVERDRUP COMPLIED E & S Plan should be included SVERDRUP FURNISHING 2 DRAWINGS s i?036?eOG82 6 MAY-14-9�1 TUE 14:20 FREDICK CO CT COMMONS 17036760682 P_02 71991 =, COUNTY--ef-_FREDERICk I� Dcparcmenc of Planning and Det�elopmen: {� 703 665-56`1 REQUEST POR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703 667-017( Frederick County Trwpections,Department P-0. Boa 601,.Winchester, Virginia 22GOI ( 703 ) 665-5651 The Frederick County Inspections Department is located at 9 court Square in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. APplicant's name, address and phone number: Sverdrup Corporation 801 North llth street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-436-7600 Attn: George Cutter, Project Manager Name of development and/or description of the requests KGF Beverage Plant Winchester, Virginia Location: Fort Collier Industrial park 20 Acres North West of intersection of Park Center Drive and West Brooke Road, Frederick County, Virginia znspectious DePal:lme-nt Comments: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code/1990 and Section 305 Use Group F (Factory and Industrial) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Inspect. Signature & Dater \ -- (NOTICE TO INSPECTIONS pL SE RETURN IS F01� TO A2PLICA-NT_ } NOTICE TO APPLICAN-T- It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in ,cder to assist ':he agency with their review. Also, please attacl, a copy of your plans and/or application form. 0 CU TTE,R COUNTY of FREDERICK IJ Dcpartmcnt of P1ann1n2 and Dc�,clopmcnt 70z 66S-50 BEQUEST FOR -SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 70 667-03-,0 Frederick County Sanitation Authority P.O. Boa 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 t, The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. OFF/C�' /Nfd AppLicant's name, address and phone.number: Sverdrup Corporation 801 North llth Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-436-7600 f• C1 Attn: George Cutter, Project Manager JName of development and/or description of the request: KGF Beverage Plant Winchester, Virginia Q h e� Location: v Fort Collier Industrial Park 1 ' 20 Acres North West of intersection of Park Center Drive N r- V ' h and West Brooke Road, Frederick County, Virginia V V Sanitation Authority. [�57 / 1,71F s quo Y/S WTip - o E �'slrD,� r • s ,� tr d B 3�a✓ A.�i�i�ry - y �s PPR o wre AloTEo. . Sanit. Signature & Date: j'/ .911 (NOTICE TO SANITATION - SE RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE To APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as Possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, EVEN& 6`;- 4 ��- COUNTY Of FREDERICK Department of "Planning and De-lclopment 703 665.565t REQUEST FOR SITE PLAN COMMENTS FAX 703 667-03 0 Frederick County Sanitation Authority P_O. Boa 618, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on the second floor of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. oF�ic,,c i�vfd Applicant's name, address and phone.number��'"' Sverdrup Corporation 801 North llth Street St. Louis, MO 63101 314-436-7600 Attn: George Cutter, Project Manager Name of development and/or description of the request: KGF Beverage Plant Location: Winchester, Virginia Fort Collier Industrial Park 20 Acres North West of intersection of Park Center Drive and West Brooke Road, Frederick County, Virginia Sanitation Authority Comments: CL-nzq Fe-7-4- /3 Sanit. Signature & Date: (NOTICE TO SANITATION - SE RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach TWO copies of your plans and/or application -form. • •E, -efully Compacted Select :kfill 8 " STONE AGGREGATE CONCRETE AGGR AG ATE CONCRETE ARCH e refully Compacted lect Backfill 4"(min) CONCRETE CRADLE Carefully Compacted Select Backfill 8" _8.. Carefully Compacted — 7124" Select Backfill --C- 4 " n r) ETE (typical) L6.. L6.. STONE AGGRAGATE CONCRETE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT REPAVE TO 1-1 /2 TIMES ORIGINAL THICKNESS SAW CUT TO BE MADE AT TIME OF . _ REPLACEMENT (typ) 8" 8„ B ACKF ILL M AT'L AS REO'D BY VDOT PERMIT (Full Depth Crushed Stone typical) 6" YDOT PAYEMENT REPLACEMENT TRENCH & BEDDING DETAILS w&S- i DOUBLE CHE@K ASSEMBLY Backflow Preventer cc 709DDC or 909DDC Series are designed to prevent the reverse flow of fire protection system substances, i.e., glycerin wetting agents, stagnant water and water of non -potable quality from being pumped or syphoned into the potable water line. Detects leaks ... with emphasis on the cost of unaccountable water; incorporates a meter which allows the water utility to: • Detect leaks underground that historically create great annual cost due to waste. • It provides a detection point for unauthorized use. It can help locate illegal taps. Modular check design concept facilitates maintenance and assem- bly access. All 709DDC sizes are standardly equipped with AWWA epoxy coated UUFM listed OS&Y gate valves, CFM (cubic feet per minute) 5/8" x 3/4" meter and ball type test cocks. 709DDC Series can be installed horizontally or vertically. 909DDC Series must be installed horizontally. Series 909DDC Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly: When applications call for maximum protection, use 909ODC with relief vent to atmosphere. FEATURES • Compact for economy • Body construction epoxy combined with performance coated cast iron • Design simplicity for easy • Removeable bronze seats maintenance • Stainless steel internal parts • Furnished with Recordall 3/4" • Max. flow at low pressure drop meter model 25, bronze CFM meter DIMENSIONS —WEIGHTS tare approximate) ODD 0 I l�r1 `� •I��,• +II�i Y DIMENSIONS (Inches) WEIGHT (Lbs.) ` OO OOV �OOV ADO` A'O` A.4 Size A I A 1 8 C D I E I F F G H J DS&Y OS&Y 3" 24 26 12 8 7 8 40 421/4 18'h 3 14 190 250 4" 34 37 17 8 10 9 52 551/s 23% 6 15 403 490 6" 41 44 21 11 15 11 63 651/2 321A 8 16 727 820 8" 52 55 26 13 19 12 75 783/4 39'% 9 17 1327 1656 10" 64 67 32 16 22 13 90 935/8 48 10114.18 2093 2250 D E6 E 0 10 R07_" 13 MATERIALS Epoxy coated cast iron body, bronze seat and disc holder; stainless steel trim and durable, tight -seating rubber check valve discs. Series 709DDC sizes W-10" All sizes furnished with bronze body ball valve test cocks. Furnished with outside stem and yoke (OS&Y) gate valves. No. 709DDC by-pass line unit consists of an approved No. 709 double check vlave assembly and water meter. Send for PL-BPDL for illustrated price list. OPTIONS: (Options can be combined) Suffix: RW resilient wedge shut-off valves GPM furnished with gallons per minute meter. LF less gate valves (4" thru 10") PRESSURE —TEMP Sizes 3" through 10" are suitable for supply pressures up to 175 PSI and water temperatures to 110°F maximum. STANDARDS 709DDC meets or exceeds the following standards for double check valve assemblies: A.S.S.E. Standard No. 1015, AWWA Standard C506; FCCCHR of USC Manual Section 10. U.L. classified file No. EX3185 (sizes 21/2" thru 10") and are listed under CSA B 64 standard. CAPACITY ®® C"®Ma� No. 709 DDC Sizes 3% 4" 14. N 12 a 10 a 0 8 (L O w 6 ir 4 Uj w rr 2 d 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 FLOW - G.P.M. No. 709 DDC Sizes 6", 8", 10" 20 0 18 d 16 i 14 a0 12 10 LU 8 6 N w 4 a 2 n 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000 DETECTOROETER with TURBINE BYPWS MODELS MFM II/MHR and MFM II/MVR The Hersey Models MFM II/MHR and MFM II/MVR consist of the standard torrent (current) mainline measuring chambers with a turbine meter on the bypass. The Hersey Models MHR and MVR Magnetic Drive Turbine meters are designed with an exclusive patented Retro-Thrust® feature which provides for longer life over a wide flow range with low pressure loss. The MHR is designed with a horizontal polypropylene rotor, flow straightening vanes molded to the inlet hub and registers which are easily recalibrated in line. The Model MVR is designed with a vertical polypropylene rotor, stainless steel internal ring strainer and a permanently hermetically sealed Dura-Dri'" register. Both models are bronze case. CAPACITY MODEL MFM II/MHR CAPACITY MODEL MFM II/MVR Size AWWA Rated Maximum GPM (a psi Max Head Lou) MFM 11 — MHR Hari, MOOMa Maximum GPM, AWWA GPM TM F1x,. Range tAan m Mu 1 '�^•^ W" ° ww ... •rw t.•., 3' x 2.. 400 Fu0 Capacity 01 Pipe B-400 5-400 4' . 2- 1 700 8-700 5-700 6 a 3" 1600 16-160C 8-1600 8" x a" 2800 26-28M 10-2000 10" x 6" 4400 a6•U00 15-ea00 10- x 12" x 6' not listed not 1lsled 15-5400 AWWA ft. MFM 11-MVR AWWA GPM H✓•.70PI. $IZe Mu' GPM Henv7 M.", Tee, FI " T.M F— ii.M1u'1inH•.a 1• pa, Max He LOe[I Maximum GPM Range than W Max i P" Lau 3' x 2" 400 Full capacity Pipe 8-400 2-a00 a" ■ 2', 700 6-700 2-7Go 6- x 3' t600 16-1wo 2 5-1600 8" x 4" 2800 28-28M 3.5-2800 MFM II/MHR WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS (REC. SETTING) MFM II/MVR WEIGHTS AND DIMENSIONS (REC. SETTING) MODEL MFM II - MHR WITH TURBINE METER BY-PASS AND 3Y-PASS LINE a12f M.re.,. x e, -- Twea . A• B" C.. D" E` F.. G.. H.. I.. J.. K" M- ON" PEN O., t�ssN 3- x 2' 1 45 1 20 7 81 39 ,• 3 -12-1 71 11 B 1 24 133 +6J a ,+ 119 194 . 375 A-.2- 47 21.7/8 42 17-11 2477 13 9 27."it 33 17-3-1 11, 121 22-111 5 M2 51 26-31a a6 21.172 1. 9e 16 10.111 3Y5.'e 45 11 1. 16 ,a6 31-1/e 6 e9e 32-7/e a9 2a-3.a N tt2 to tl-t/1 NJ/8 53 26 t2 la,60-J/a 7-v7 ,6506 �57- .2 5. 30 1. 13a 21 13 52-37a 6e 33-3,a'2 106 ae-1/a 9.311 19606 a2 50 3J-,R N taa 2. ,a 523'a 6a 33-3. 2. ,92 56-,/B tt-L. >OSD "10` meter w111, +2- •rid Rang- 1 6' 6, MIN W(ii ,,• Km 1. N os•a •"c •.e 1t.s•lc-• P.A *! • f xM( •1 'ea[T [e0 - — BY-P►ss UME --- 1 APMOx ORE FOOT �C■f It.■Il�dl I�!►1� ��II��1 �II�Q �llli !►J��;� ...�1 � III/�I I I�JI u31� a. BYPASS LINE AND VALVES INSIDE OF PIT MODEL MFM II METER WITH MODEL MVR BY-PASS BY-PASS LINE AND VALVES INSIDE OF PIT Not ;.Y A B c D E F G H I J K L M OPNM1 O W9t� LbC 3' x 2" 45 20-3/4 39 a-3/a124171 11 a 23.7/8 3316-3/a 11 119 10-1/4 a 354 a" x 2" 48 21-3/4 42 17-1/2 24 77 13 9 2a-7/e 33 17-3/a 13 125 2-7/0 5 42i 6' x 3" 50 25-5/6 46 21-1/2 2a 96 16 0.1 33-7/8 a5 21-5 16 146 31-1/8 6 872 8- x 4" 5a 31-3/8 a8 2a-3/e 2a tt2 to 11.1/ a1J/a 53 26-1/2 t8 t60 39.3/a 7-1R 1636 METER MUST BE SET IN A HORIZONTAL POSfTION, AND HAVE AT LEAST 6 DIAMETERS OF STRAIGHT PIPE AT INLET END. SY-PASS LINE—�--to + J ry_ 1�II.--, I� �II�j► SALES OFFICES SOUTHEAST — 2131 Kingston Court, S.E., Suite 102. Marietta, GA 30067 (404) 952-4424 NEW ENGLAND — 129 Morgan Drive, Norwood, MA 02062 (617) 762-4272 NORTHEAST — 320 Braen Ave., Wyckoff, NJ 07481 (201) 445-0373 MIDWEST — 1025 Criss Circle, Elk Grove Village, IL 60007 (312) 439-7700 W FSTERN — 7240 Eac1 S!auson Ave. Los Angeles. CA 90040 (213) 722-6870 BY-PASS LINE AND VALVES INSIDE OF PIT lr%rs PRODUCTS INC Highway 70, P.O. Box 128 Cleveland, NC 27013 A M M D D Y Y X X C I0II1eIZI 71 /1612181 • DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND�CUE COUNTY OF FREDERI 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350 DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME LAST FIRST TYPE OF INSPECTION i(—J k1lChen/hood M M D D Y Y H H M M H H M M le*�2I,71d�2`l �,lfl 1 "I-*-"L,�Tle 111/IdAIJ'I Lr I/ If IF71''IGl�lr I I I I I 1- I `'I� I_-1_—L_L_j 2"spmkeri83 3" alarm syslern 4LJ overhead door STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUIT,APT SRA 5L new wilding 6" bumatg per-4 7" blasting OCCUPANT TELEPHONE — -_ I I l I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I l I I I-L I I I -I I I I I 8" funigahon 91 Hera ioLJ plan review MANAGER/ REPRESENTATIVE! BUSINESS TELEPHONE it" ust Installation 12L_l ust Teak 13" ust removal 14" ust Ip.Id spill 15L_1 annual inspection BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE I I I 1 I I I I I I I I l 1 LL1 I I I 1 I I I I I I I l I I I-1 I I I-1 I I I I FIXED PROPERTY I I I I NUMBER OF STORIES 16LJ complaint 17" violation CONSTRUCTION TYPE i L hoe resistive 3 IL protected non-combustible 5 IL protected ordinary 7 L protected wood Name 9 L-1 not classified 2 " heavy Umber 4 L unprotected non-combustible 6 L unprotected ordinary B LJ unprotected wood o IL undeten+wred to LJ fire lane inspection 19 L1 Ere lane approval 20IL re-nspecMx 21"other FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT a RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD v II Y II II I I II I I �_ se-000L� I MI I MI II DII II DII Y Y UU—use—uL-1 UUL�L�J INSPECTION GUIDELINE -CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING EXIT AND EGRESS Ci 61 Unapproved a Detective Gas Connecuor G I Space Under Starts Used for Storage Purposes ❑ 31 Inadequate Means of Egress ❑ 62 Damaged of Deteriorated Vent Pipe on Gas Burning Appliance G 2 Broken Ceilings andlor Walt — Exposed Lath on Ceilings andtx Waft ❑ 32 Second Means o1 Egress Not Readily Accessible D 63. Vent Hoods, Vent Fans andbr Duct Systems Need Clearteg (Unnatural Openmgsl ❑ 33 Aisles andu Passageways Obstructed ❑ 64 Comotm lL>tes Beep Stored Near Hot Wall Heater D 3 Defective andO Unapproved Incnerata andgr Spark Arrests Screen ❑ 34 Panic Hardware (Anti Panic Latches and Botts) Required on Exit Doors ❑ 4 Cardboard Ceilings andor Wars ❑ 35 Discharge From Exits. Outside Building, Etc ORDINARY HAZARDS ❑ 5 Fire Door Not Serviceable ❑ 36 Exitway Blocked and" Obstructed ❑ 65 Poor Housekeeping Cordmax D 6 Foe Door Blocked of Wedged Open ❑ 37 Exit Door Locked and a Barncaded Cl 66 Improper Storage C 7 Oil Soaked Wood Floors 038 Exit Not Property Designated of Marked ❑ 67 Storage of Floor Oil, Cleaning Compounds, Waxes. Polishes, Etc D 8 Arne Areas Open to the Outside. Screen. to Prevent Entry by Buds C 39 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative C 68 Storage o1 Excelsior. Straw, Sawdust, Burlap, Etc D 9 Doors Requiring Sell Closing Devices Not So Equipped ❑ 40 Itunenating Doechonal Sans to Exits Required D 69 Metal Drip Parts Regured But Not Provided ❑ 10 Prohibitive—Shouid Be Razed ❑ 41 Exo Door Swaging Against Line of Exit ]ravel ❑ 70 Excessive Grease on Stove ❑ 11 Open and Exposed Foundation Beneath Bolding 042 Stairways Not Property Enclosed andbr Equipped WM Non Standard Doors ❑ 71 Cocklo t Cover Off ❑ 12 Post Max Occupancy Load C 43 Stairways Not Property Illumnakd ❑ 72 Unapproved ]rash Cortt firers ❑ 44 Emergency While Lights ELECTRICAL D 13 mega) and or Boot Leg Wiring FIRE PROTECTION SPECIAL HAZARDS ❑ 73 Unnecessary and" Orsaderry Accumulation of Boxes. Cartons, Etc. ❑ 14 Inadequate Service ando IrulMipent Circuits ❑ 45 Fire Extinguishers Required But Not Provded Collapse—Matntaln Orderly Arrangement ❑ 15 Insufficient Receptacles 046 Foe Extinguishers Need Rechargingllrlspeclion ❑ 74 Smoking in Hazardous Location, "No Smoking" Signs Needed ❑ 16 Defective. Deteriorated or Spiced Wiring ❑ 47 Unapproved hype Fire Extinguishers ❑ 48 Fire Extinguishers Not Properly Mounted 4' 60' 075 Flammable Liquids ands Gases Being Impropery, Used andbr Shed ❑ 17 Defective andbr Broken Fixtures ❑ 18 Defective andor Broken Switches ands Sockets ❑ 49 Fire Eitingulshers Not Readily Visible ❑ 76 Inadequate Venoaton In Hazardous Location ❑ 77 Storage of Compressed GasConders Without Proper Anchorage (Racks or D 19 Circuit Breakers By -Passed a Blocked Open O 50 Standpipe Nose lktenorated!Nor Racked Chains) n ❑ 20 Oversize Fuses aMvr Crtcuit Breakers Set Too High 51 Fee Protection System ❑ 52 Detective Standpipe Nozzles 078 Oxygen Cylinders Being Stored and an Used in Greasy or 011y Locations 021 Pennies Behind Plug type Fuses Holder Cut Back ❑ 22 Metal Strip of Fuse Hub D 53 Standpipe System Disconnected ❑ 19 Oxygen Cylinders Barg Stored Near Acetylene or FuN Gas Cylinders ❑ 80 0:dizeg Materials Being Stored With Acids, Suipttur. Etc ❑ 23 Fuses Jumped of Bridged ❑ 24 Open Junctlon Box anal Fuse Box ❑ 54 Sprinkler Heads, Cut -Offs or Siamese Blocked D 55 Inadequate Sprinkler Head Clearance 08 Inches Required( C 81 Unapproved andror Hazardous Paint Spraying ❑ 82 ]rash Room Door Not Equipped With Serf-Closrtg Device ❑ 25 Fuse Panel Obstructed and er Inaccessible 30' 056 Sprinkler Valves Not Properly Identified ❑ 83 Open Flame HeatinginHazardous Location ❑ 26 Morris ands Farts Dirty of Dust Covered AND COOKING ❑ 84 Vacant at Time of Inspection 027 Unapproved Extension ds/Drop Cads 0 57 bete D 57 Defective Heating U Furnace. Gas Baler, Stove. Heater,Etc ❑ 85 Locked at Time of Inspectlon 028 Excessive Use of Mu Outlet R � Ws nit ❑ 58 Detective Cooking Unit —Range, Hot Rah. Etc ❑ 86 See Supplement Sheet ❑ 29 Lamps. Fixtures. Equpmen, Etc. Not Property Enclosed (Hazardous ❑ 59 Gass Meter Blocked andpr ObstnxclediNot Protected Locaborts Only( ❑ 60 Furnace, Baler. Heatotg Cooking andbr Smokeppe and Vent Roe 87 IN THE OPINION OF THE INSPECTOR. THERE WERE NO HAZARDOUS .030 Dead arid Unused Wang, Should Be Removed Clearances, From Combustible Materials, Not Standard CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS The conditions reported on Mtis foam relied the prernisis as observed by W inspector, at the time of inspection. Any error or orrmission regarding b to safety or tonditiors regarding Tie prev" Om we unintentional and are not deemed the fault of the caxlty. SIGNATURE OF INSPECTOR IF RECEIVED BY POW ES-1 - CIRNTY OF FREDER I vK , V I RC I N I0 t FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 0515?1445 Date Received (}514?1 Date Reviewed 051591 Applicant Name Sverdrup Corporation At tn: George Cutter Address 801 No. . 1 1 th Street St. Louis, Missouri 63101 Project Name KGF Beverage Plant Phone No. 314-436-76 () Type of Application Site Plan Current Zoning M-1 1st Due Fire Co. 13 ist Due Rescue Co. 13 Election District Stonewall RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System x Residential Sprinkler System Automatic_ Fire Alarm System x Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes x No Comments: Fire lanes required as shown on attached drawing #C-5. Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate x Inadequate Special Hazards Noted; Yes Comments: Not Identified No X y' i71-ail 1 l_ t- . Hdequate Inadequate Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified x Additional Comments: Hydrant locations al-e in compliance with, Frederic:: County Chapter 11._1. Hotwever, chances have been reguelsted to Facilitate more efficient and safes- fire fighting procedures. See attached for additional comments. Review Time c hr-s Do la's A. �iii-�acofe Fire Marshal Thomas W. Owens Director Site Flan Comments k'GF Beverage Plant Fire Marshal's Office COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT 21 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia 22601 #Z 515t7 114-45 Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal 1. Relocate hydrant, on north side of fire lane, 60' west, so both hydrants can be accessed without blocking fire lane with apparatus. 2. Hydrant needed near front of building, on island and protected from traffic impact. 3. Hydrant at front of structure will satisfy distance requirements established in Chapter 10, Frederick: County Code, so indicated hydrant can be eliminated if desired. 4. See attached dr awino #C-J 5. See attached drawing #C-5 6. As discussed in pre -construction meetings, this is preferred location of Siamese (F.D.C.) connection. 7. Fire lane on north side of structure must be capable of supporting 25 ton vehicle. B. Access during construction by emergency •Vehicles is required at all times. 9. Clearance around all hydrants, F'.I.V.'s and siamese connection is to be considered on landscaping plans as well as during construction. This equipment must be readily accessible at all t i me•s . lip. Hydrants must be placed within 3' of curb line DAk: i 1 a cc: Clearbrook V.F.D. Frederick: Co. Planning Dept. File DIRECTOR - (703) 665-5618 FIRE MARSHAL - (703) 665-6350 FAX - (703) 667-0370 i COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA �fhomas W. Owens Director Site Flan Comments 1-:6F beverage Plant Fire Marshal's Office FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT 21 Court Square, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal 1. Relocate hydrant, on north side of fire lane, 60' west, so both hydrants can be accessed without blocking fire lane with apparatus. 2. Hydrant needed near front of building, on island and protected from traffic impact. 3. Hydrant at front of structure will satisfy distance requirements established in Chapter 10, Frederick: Count•. Code, so indicated hydrant can be eliminated if desired. `fi. See attached drawing #1:__t; 1. See attached drawing ing 3#C--5 6. As d 1'=;'_L+. _J'-o t3%j 11: pre-constFuction meetingE location of siamese (F.D.C.) connection. 7. Fire lane on north side nT structins most on �)101- 01 nipn"-Anq 25 ton vehicle. B. Access u. 1 n g construction by emergency ` ` __ '-: i _ ._. _requiled at : .. :_2ea:-ail`e around all :t`:'drti tl L' F.I.V._.. _.. _. __.. ._.. _._.: tti _.._..nt'`%. .. _. 1i is to be consideredo i : landscaping plans as well ascuring construction. This equipment must be readily accessible at al). ). times. 10. Hydrants must be placed within 3 of curb line cc! Clearbrook: V.F.D. Frederick: Co. Planning Dept. File REVIEW COMMENTS — FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE Marked up print Dwg C-5 1. Relocate fire hydrant 60' west SVERDRUP COMPLIED 2. Hydrant needed at front of building SVERDRUP COMPLIED 3. Fire hydrant may be omitted SVERDRUP OMMITTED 4. Indicate painted curbs for fire lane SVERDRUP COMPLIED 5. Signs reading "No Parking Fire Lane" SVERDRUP COMPLIED • 41 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 051591445 Date Received 051491 Date Reviewed 051591 Applicant Name Sverdrup Corporation Attn: George Cutter Address eol No. 1 1 th Street St. Louis, Missouri 63101 Project Name KGF Beverage Plant Phone No. 314-436-7600 Type of Application Site Flan Current Zoning_ M-1 ist: Due Fire Co. 13 1 t Due Fescue Co. 13 Election District Stonewall RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System t other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate t inadequate - identified -_ Required; No Comments: rt_' lanes t'- t_i i_l i r e li as shown on attached drawing C __ .J . Roadwa•J:"r islewcay widths` Adequate x inadequate Special Hazard' Noted; Yes Comments: Not identified No X �� [����TY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINI��� �� FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS �& Control No. 051591445 Date Received 061791 Date Reviewed 070291 , __-__- _ - Applicant Name Sverdrup Corporation Address 801 N Eleventh Street � St. Louis, Missouri 63101 Project Name KGF Beverage Plant Phone No. 314-436-7600 Type of Application Revised Site Plan Current Zoning M-1 1st Due Fire Co. 13 1st Due Rescue Co. 13 Election District Stonewall RECOMMENDATIONS Automatic Sprinkler System X Residential Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate_ X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No Comments: Fire lanes required as discussed. Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Special Hazards Noted; Yes X Comments: Not Identified No �7- V ^ Hydrant Locations; Adequate X inadequate ^ Siamese Connection Location; Approved X Not Approved Not Identified Not Identified Additional Comments: All changes requested have been made. Plans approved. Review Time 1.0 hrs. Douglas A. Viracofe Fire Marshal K 01 DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND RESCUE COUNTY OF FREDERICK M M D o r v% x c P.O. Box601 N0- 0057 LC� �ii7�u I t l Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350 I DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME I TYPE OF INSPECTION 1 kanen,hood M M D� 0 VY Y H H M M H H M M LAST FIRST C^ �12 / I I /I/ I�` I C I As / I/� 1/ I - el �%1 f �T I I f f S[��'ILl�1 L��I -�I " 2l_J apiniclarrsa li 3" Norm sysbm 6" cr w Mad door 5L�1newtww" 1 6" I%x*irrg perrrN 7U blaaang euAxrngetron 9L-__I Ix% to" pan review 11"ust—Aanaton 12" usl leak 13" uV ner oval i ,.tu umwaespill STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUIT,APT SRA �, ✓ C L1, C.1 i 1 Ci�i I �I�I I�I �I 1 1 I i I 1 I 11 I I I 1 CL f/ F� OCCUPANT TELEPHONE rAZ,2' > I�FiLi� 1��1 If'Ic%ICIL� �I f 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I I -I 1 1 f-1 1 I f 1 MANAGER/ REPRESENTATIVE! BUSINESS TELEPHONE BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE 1�rPl/�FT I I I I I I I I L/I I f I I t`I I I 1 I t t t I I I -I I I 1-t 1 I I 1 FIXED PROPERTY l I I I U � r✓�«�� / NUMBER OF STORIES 151 1 annual rrspecson 16" complamit violation CONSTRUCTION TYPE i hire resistive 3 protected non-combusnde 5 " protected ordinary 7 " protected wood home 9 not cfaclassified17u 2 L—�I heavy timber 4 LJ unprotected noncombijs^bie 6 U unpclectea ordinary 8 " unpoected wood 0 U undekarnwned 1s" "we tnisdecao' 11 fire lane sppoval FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT a RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD Y Y I I I I t� — lJI lJ I UI I-1 I I I I `Y� • � L J l��KL INSPECTION GUIDELINE -CORRECTIONS REQUIRED _ The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING EXIT AND EGRESS G 61 Unappoved or Defective Gas Connection C I Space Under Stairs Used for Storage Purposes El 31 Inadequate Means of Egress C 62 Damaged or Deteriorated Vern Pipe on Gas Brirtrrg Appaance G 2 Broken Ceilings and or Walls — Exposed Lam on Ceilings and%or Wafs C 32 Second Means of Egress Not Readily Accessible 63 'brit t4wt 'km Farts and%or Duct Systems Need C" Unnatural Operr NS) El33 Atsms aria or Passageways Obstructed Z 6 Conmustiors &vtg Skilled Nees fop Water HqW G 3 Detective and%or Unapproved Mcnerator and%or Spark Arrest Screen ❑ 34 Panic Hardware (Anti-Parirc Latches and Bob) Required on Ent Doors j C 4 Cardboard Cerkgs and%or Walt 035 Discharge From Exit. Outside Building, Et. ORDINARY HAZARDS C 5 Fire Door Not Serviceable ❑ 36 Exitway Blocked and%or Obstructed ❑ 65 Poor Housekeeping Condition C 6 Fire Door Blocked a Wedged Open ❑ 37 Exit Door Locked and%or Barricaded ❑ 66. Impol er Storage 2 7 Ov Soaked Wood Floors C 38 Exit Not Property Designated or Marked C 67 Stage of Floes Oils. Clearvng Compounds Waxes. Polishes, Etc. C 8 Attic Areas Open to the Outside. Screen to Prevent Entry by Birds C 39 Exit Lphts Provided But Not Operative C 68 Stage of Excelua. Straw. Sawdust. Bump. Etc G 9 Dons Regilrmq Sed Closing Devices Not So Equipped C 40. IAummaMg Dreeoonal Signs to Exits Required C 69 Metal Dip Pare Required. But Not Proncied CIO PraktxtNe—Shoud Be Rum C 41 Exit Door Swvi rig Apart Line of Exit laud C 70 Excessree Grease on Sim G 11. Open and Exposed FoWaoon Beneath Building 042 Stairways Not Protiery Eocosw and.ur Equipped Vft Ion -Standard Doors O 71, Cockkoh Cover Off G 12 Post Max Occupancy Load 043 Stairways Not Property offmated O 72. Unapproved lasn Containers 044 Emergency Wtrte Lgnct ELECTRICAL C 13 iaegal and or BoLeg Wiring ot- ❑ t 4 inadequate Service anciv hnsulhoent Circuits FIRE PROTECTION ❑ 45 Fire Extinguishers Required. But Not Provided SPECIAL HAZARDS O 73 Unnecessary W o Dlwrderty Accumulation of Boxim Cartons, Et_ Collapse —Manton Orderly Arrangement C 15 Insuttiptnt Receptacles ❑ 16 Detective. Deteriorated a Spliced Wiring C 46, Fie Extinguishers New Recharge giklspection O 47 Unapproved Type Fie Extinguishers; O 74. Sh" in Hazardous Location, "No Smoking- Sias Needed ❑ 75 Flammable Liquids and or Gases Berg Improperly Used and/or Steed ❑ t7 Detective and%or Broken FnRures 018 Detective andgr Broken Switches and/or Sonnets ❑ 48 Fire Exaguksners Not Proptrfy Mounted 1•-60' 049 Fie Extinguishers Na Readily Visible C 76, Inadequate Vtnflabon in Hazardous Location ❑ 77. SIpr of Compressed GasCpnders WMOta Proper Anchorage (RKks or 019 Circus Breakers By -Passed or Blocked Open ❑ 50 Staidppmo e Hose DetratedrNof Racked ❑ 20 Oversize Fuses and%or Crcuit Breakers Set Too High ❑ 21 Pennies Behind Rug Type Fuses 051 File Protection System 052 Defechve Stardppe Nozzles 078 0 rygen ❑ 19 0 Cylinders Belong Steed and%or Used in Greasy a Qty Locations Cylinders Barg Steed Near Acetylene or Fuel Gas Cylinders ❑ 12 Metal Snip of Fuse Holder Cut Back ❑ 23 Fuses Jumped a Bridgedn O 53 Stardpge System DisconnectedrM ❑ 54 Sprinkler a kler Heads. Cul-ft Siamese Mocked 080 Oxtdurg MaMuerg ls BSteWith h Ards. Sulpha. Eli ❑ 81 Unmoved ando Hazardous Pant Spaying 024 Open Junction Box and%or Fuse Box ❑ 15 Fuse Panel Obstructed and%or haccmft 02 055 55 Sprinkler Inadequate Valves Sgri Not PropertySprinkler Head Clearance ntfiwance (t8 Inches Required) 082 lash Roan Door Not Equipped WM Self -Closing; Devitt 1!3 Open Fame Heating in Hazardous Location ❑ 26 Moors and%or Fars Dirty or Dust Covered 027 Unapproved Extension Gads/Drop Cads HEATING AND COOKING O 57 Dekchre Heating Unit —Fames. Gas Boiler, Sim, Heater. Et. ❑ 64 Vacant at Time of klspec-tion ❑ 85 Locked at Time of Inspection ❑ 28 E messrve Use of Multiple Outlet Plugs ❑ 29. Lamps. Fillu , Egapmeril Et., Not Property E(Hazardous O 58. Defective Cooking g Uri—Parge. Hot Plate. Et. ❑ 59. Gas Meter Booked aroma Otismicedl/W Protected ❑ 96. See Supplement Sheet Locations Oni .O 30 Dead and Unused Wft Should Be Removed ❑ 60 Furnace, Boiler. Heating. Cooking arid/or Smokelo a and Wend Pipe Clearances, From Combustible Materials, Not Standard 87 IN THE OPINION Of THE INSPECTOR, THERE WERE NO HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS N1 THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS C The cordiborts reported on this form retied It1e Plainness; ens as observed by our lint cbr at ftie *119 of Irlspectim Arty 9norr or onrxnission rmegardiry Link safety oreorldift regards ft tins Prshlarem airs and tiro not doWN0 the fauh the O"ity- �� z 7.9> KI M ES-1 _1/ - 1.1 E 1 M M 0 D Y Y X X C U/JL'I /I�I UI /I 9 151 61 A B 0 E f G H J K • DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND UE COUNTY OF FREDERIC P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350 DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME I TYPE OF MfSPECTN IO 1U kacfynRvood M M 0 0 Y Y H H M M H H M M LAST FIRST 1/j�'I/1�111/i �C L CJ I�i I��C7ICI�� I I_�J LC�`ICICI�I i�71 2"apnkwlss 3L-�r^syrawn 4 U overhead door STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUIT,APT SRA Z� UI I 14IA I/ I � I!-Iis1l_1l.Il I CIFti1-I e ICI 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I / SUS 61 1 burning permit Na" 81— 1furiwpabon 9" lent tOLJ plan review OCCUPANT TELEPHONE �7" 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I-E 1 1 I-1 1 1 1 I MANAGERIREPRESENTATIVBBUSINESS TELEPHONE I1 U ust ffim"eon 12U1 ust leak 131— J ust remvial 14( 1 lit kNd spa BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME - OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE FIXED PROPERTY I I I I G�G'</i NUMBER OF STORIES �_ 15" annual wfaps[.bon 16" comptant 17LJ vrolaeon CONSTRUCTION TYPE t I hre resrsuve 3 IU pictected roe-comWsude 5 Ul paecro0 ordinary 7 U protected wood lame 9 IU rot ctassi6ed 2 11 heavy umber a IU unpaened nm on-cobustible 6 " unprotected ordinary 8 IU unprobcted wood 0 IU undebrntned 78U two Iarvs �dr' 19" fire Inane appiovo FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT tl RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD 20" re-ompection I I LJ I I I I I I I I l�J L�J LJ 21 other LU u INSPECTION GUIDELINE -CORRECTIONS REQUIRED . The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING EXIT AND EGRESS C 61 Unapproved or Delecore Gas Connection C I Space Under Staffs Used for Storage Purposes ❑ 31 Inadequate Means of Egress G 62 Damaged or Detnorated Vent Poe on Gas Blnwig Appeim C 2 Broken Cerkngs and%or Walls — Exposed Lath on Ceilings and/or Walls 032 Second Means of Egress Not Readily Accord* 63. Vent Hoods, lMd Fans arilm Duct Systems Need Georg (Unnatural Openings) C 33 Arsles and a Passageways Obstructed ❑ 61 Comous i les Beq Sacred Near Hat Water Healer ❑ 3 Detective and%or Unapproved Mone'll r and%or Spark Arrestor Screen ❑ 3a Panic Hardware (Ant -Parts Latches and Bids) Required on Exit Doors C a Cardboard Ceilings and%or Walls 035 Discharge From boos. Outside Budding. Et. ORDINARY HAZARDS 0 5 Fit Door Not Servlcable ❑ 36 Exmray Blocked and%or Obstructed ❑ 65 Poor Housekeeping Condeors C 6 Fee Door Blocked or Wedged Open ❑ 37 Earn Door Locked ardor Barricaded 0 66. Improper Shape C 7 On Soaked Wood Floors ❑ 38 Exit No Properly Designated or Marked ❑ 67 Storage of Floor Dos. Cleaning Cornpouids, waxes, Fblehes. Etc, C 8 Attic Areas Open to tee Outside. Screen to Prevent Entry by Birds 039 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative C 68 Storage of Excelsior Straw, Sawdust. Burlap. Etc. ❑ 9 Doors Requiring Sets-Closnq Devices Not So Equipped ❑ ro a0 eunamg Directional Signs b Exits Required C 69 Metal Drip Pars Flegllred, But Not Provided ❑ 10. Proaaove—Should Be Razed ❑ a1 ExitDoor Swrigrig Against Une of ExitTavel ❑ 70 Excessive Grease on Sbve ❑ 11. Open and Exposed Fourhdaoon Beneadt Building 042 Stairways Nor Properly Enclosed and%or Equipped WM Non -Standard Doors C 71 Coctloft Coves Oil ❑ 12. Post Max Occupancy Load ❑ 43 Stairways Not Properly summated ❑ 72. Unapproved Tasty Contaners ❑ It Emergency Whe Lights ELECTRICAL 013 Illegal andor Bool-Leg Wirig FltE PROTECTION SPECIAL HAZARDS G 73 Unnecessary xdAx Disorderly deny Accunfulabon Of Boors. Canons. Etc.. C 1 a Inadequate Service ardAX I sufhbmt Circuits ❑ 45 File Exnngus+teM Required. But Not Provided ❑ 46. Fie Extinguishers Need ReUtargingrhnspecoa —Manton Orderly Collaetneint "Nog " ❑ 15 InsuNtcient Receptacles C 16 Detective. Deter a Spiced Wing ❑ a7 Unapproved type Fire E xenqusners Satpura tip. . O 75 Smoking le Hazardous Ltxaaon, o Sm ❑ 76. Rammaale Liquids ardnx Gass Barg improg- Signs Needed plrly Used a10br Shed Broke 017 Detective and%or Broken Fixtures 0 48 Fire Exmtglxshers Not Pr Mounted a'-W off' ❑ a9 Fire E xttnqushers Not Readily Veable C 76. Inadcguat 1kntAatiort n Hazardous Lorabdn alloo ❑ 18 Dekcove and%or Broken Switches and%or Sockets 019 Circuit Breakers By -Passed or Blocked Open 050 Stando" Hose DelerdratedrNot Racked C 77 Storage of Compressed GasCyW del Witholit Proper Andiforage (Reis or Chaos) 0 20. Overwe Fuses and%or Circuit Breakers Set Too High g 051 Fire Protecoon System078 052 Deffcnve Slardppe Nozzles Cylinders " Strad Qy laersm 021 Penrxes Beand Plug Type Fuses 022 Metal Strip of Fuse Holder Cut Back 053 Stamm System Disconnected C 79, Oxygen C BBerg Stored Nedar Acetytne or Fuel Gas CyYd 0 80 Ondtartg Materials Beq Shred With Acids. Sulphur. Etc. 023 Fuses Jumped or Bridged ❑ 5/ Sprinkler Heads. Cut-0fs or Siamese Blocked ❑ 81 Unapproved and%or Hazardous Palm Sprayrg ❑ 14 Open Junction Box and%or Fuse Box 1155 Inadequate Sprinkler Head Clearance (18 Itches Required) C 56 Sprinkler Valves Not Properly Identified ❑ 82 Trash Room Door Not Ewpped WM Self -Closing Devitt ❑ 25 Fuse Pend Obstructed aMbr Iuccesslbk 30' 0 83. Open Flame Heating in Hazardous Location C 26 Motors and%or Fans Dirty or Dust Covered HEATING AND COOKING ❑ 84. Vacant at In* of Inspection O 27. Unapproved Exlensnrt Cords/Drop Cads ❑ 57 Defective Heating Unit —Furnace. Gas Boiler, Stove, Fleeter. Etc. 0 85 Locked at Time of kspecoon ❑ 28. Excessre Use of Mu%* Oueef Pkps 0 58. Deflct" Cookng Und—Ramps. Hot Plate, Eh. C $6. See Stgptrnent Sheet C 29. Lamps. Futures. EgjpmeK Ek., Not Property Etncbs 1 (Hawdo s ❑ 59 Gas Meter Blocked ande r Obsoucted/W Protected Locations Orgy) ardAx Sndleplpe and VMU Pipe 87. N THE OPINION OF THE THERE WERE NO HAZARDOUS O 60 Furnace. Bolls. Habig. CookiCombustible .0 30. Dead and L�i Wing; Should Be Re., Clearances. From Comllustibk Mattnb, Not Standard CONDITION IN THIS AREA THEETTIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS The conditions reWled on flis form defect the prernisis as observed by our inspector. at tine Yens of Inspection. Any errorr or atxnisafon regarding GM safely or conditions regarding *a po em illm are unintentional and are not dean_ nod the faun of Cie coley. IF RECEIVED BY POW ES-1 ti M M D D YY Y X X C IA&IXICI /I/1915141 A B C 0 E F G H J K • DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AND#UE COUNTY OF FREDERI P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350 DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME I TYPE OF INSPECTION t U kitchen/food M Mr D D r Y H H M M H H M M LAST FIRST 1/14iI`J-/I IAr%IQI �IIG1 I��I��/�in�'� I I I I �fl�/fcL1%�Iy1 2ue1nkW1. 3" alarm sYstein 4U overhead door 5Zf newt kq 6" Oixnrq permit 8" t>mna 6u��� 9" tent p�,p�r� III I ust Vvistalwo, 12" us1 teak 13" ust removal 14U ust kK d spill STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUIT, APT SRA /� t I 141YI/I I��l�l�l I�G'1 lXi ICI 1 I�/}FI I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I, �,,�i OCCUPANT �7 el'f I I &1 � ff ? el �- / MANAGER/REPRESENTATIVI'-BUSINESS TELEPHONE t' i1 C..-f/�i� IV13.L1CICI�'� I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I /I �I-Is crl I-•-%n BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME - OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE y / FIXED PROPERTY L 1 1 1 G S� ���Y � � NUMBER OF STORIES / t5U amual ahapscborh 16" Complaint 17u ralaadh CONSTRUCTION TYPE I I /l I fire resistive 3 U palecle0 ran-comDusM)le 2 U heavy limper 4 U unprotected nothtombushbxe 5 U protected ordinary 7 U prabcbd wood frame 6 U unprotected ordinary B U unpobcled wood 9 not clgsrked 0 U urWetermned 18" (we Wha Inapecfon 19" Are tans approval 2o" re-a"pecaon FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT a RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD v M MD D Y Y Ur I I I I I I I I I — I I � I I I I I I' I — — I " I I I I I' 21 U .0. U lJ lJ LJ U LJ l—J U U LJ lJ LJ lJ U I5:-7.1l INSPECTION GUIDELINE —CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The Following Conditions Need Corrections: BUILDING EXIT AND EGRESS ❑ 61 Unapproveda Defecove Gas Connectlon 0 I Space Under Starts Used ter Storage Purposes 031 Inadequate Means of Egress 0 62 Damaged or Deteriorated Vent Pipe on Gas Burma Appkm 0 2 Broken Ceilings ardor Wins — Exposed Lath on Ceilings and%or Walls ❑ 32 Second Means of Egress Not Readily Accessbe ❑ 63. Vent Hoods, Vern Fars and%or Duct Systems Need Clear" (Unnatural Openings) ❑ 33 Asks and%or Passageways Obstructed 0 64 ComolsbDles Be" Stored New Hot WM Healer ❑ 3 0 lectne azd%or Unapproved Incinerate and%or Spark Arrestor Screen 034 Panic Hardware (Anti-Prac Latches and Boles) Reared on Exit Doors ❑ 4 Cardboard Celkngs and a Walks ❑ 35 Discharge From Exits. Outside &dldng. Et. ORDINARY HAZARDS 0 5 Fire Door Not Serviceable ❑ 36 Exnway Blocked and%or Obstructed ❑ 65 Poor Housekeeping Conditions C 6 Fee Door Blocked or Wedged Open ❑ 37 Exit Door Locked and%or Barricaded 066 Improper Sbage 0 7 Oil Soaked wood Floors C 38 Exit Not Property Designated or Marked ❑ 67 Storage of Floor Oft. Cleaning Compounds, waxes. PoWhes. Etc C 8 Amc Areas Open to the Outside. Screen to Prevent Entry by Bids C 39 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative C 68 Storage of Excelsior. Straw. Sawdust. Bunap. Eli. ❑ 9 Doors Requiring Sed-Cbsng Devices Not So Equipped ❑ 40 leunknanrp Directional Sens b Exits Required 069 Metal Drip Parts Required. But Not Provded 010 Prdnbrtive—Shoved Be Rued O 11. Open and Exposed Foundation Beneath Bulldkhq � 41 Exit Door Sw itiginq Aganst Low of Exit laud 42 fairways Not Property Eric osed and%or Egelpped wed Non-Stwdad C 70 Excessive Grease on Steve Doors ❑ 71 Cockoff Cover Oft 0 12 Post Max Oaupat" Load (� C Stairways Not Properly Ruminated 0 72. Unapproved last) Containers V 1� Emergency Whe Lights ELECTRICAL f C 13 Illegal and%or Boot -Leg Ywrvp A I FIRE PROTECTION SPECLAL HAZARDS 0 73 Unnecessary andar DwdiIV Accumulation of Boxes, Canons, Eat, ❑ 14 Inadequate Service ardAx Insufficient Circuits ❑ 45 Fire Extinguishers Reaured, But Not Provided 046 Fie Extinguishers Need Recharging/I specba Collapse —Martian Orderly Arrangement 'No CIS Insufficient Receptacles jj 016 Detective. Deteriorated of Spaced MNV 047 Unapproved Type Fire Exonqushers ❑ 74 Smoking in Hazardous kocaeol . Smoking- Signs Needed ❑ 75 Flammable Liquids antl Gases Being Improperly Used and%or Sabred 017 Defective and or Broken Futures 048 Fie E xorgushers Not Property Mounted 4'-60' 049 Fire Extinguishers Not Readiy Visible 0 76, kudtpua a Vi nMation In Hazardous Locabdn 018 Detective ardor Broken Switches and%or Satiates 019 Circuit Breakers By -Passed or Blocked Open 050 Stanow Have DetenoraW/Not Racked 077 Stage of Compressed GasCyMbevs Wmw Proper Anchorage (Packs or Chwsl %or O 20 Oversize Fuses andCircuit Breakers Set Too Fygh C 51 Flit Protection System 052 Detective Standpipe Nozzles 078 Oxygen Cylinders Being Stored andAx Used in Greasy or Qy Locations 021 Pennies Beti d Plug Type Fuses ❑ 22 Metal Strip of Fuse Holder Cut Back 053 Standpipe System Disconnected 079 Oxygen Cylinders Barg Sexed New Acetylene or Fod Gas Cyinders 080 Oxdianq Materials Berg Shed Wit) Acids. SidpMr, Etc. 023 Fuses Jumped of Bridged 024 Open Junction Box araar Fuse Box ❑ 54 Spmkw Heads. Cul-ft or Siamese Blocked 055 Inadequate Sonickr Head Clearance 08 Inches Reouredl 081 Unapproved ada Hazardous Pam Spraying ❑ 82 lash Room Door Not Equipped YAM Sect-Closnq Dewier ❑ 25. Fuse Panel Obstructed and%or Inaccessible 30' 0 56 Sprinkler Valves Not Property Idended ❑ 83. Open FWm Heatirg in Hazardous Loabon ❑ 26 Morons and%or Fans Dirty or Oust Covered HEATING AND COOKING ❑ 84 Vacant at Time of Inspection 0 27 Unapproved Extension Cords*op Cords C 57 Dekcove Heating Urnt—Furnace. Gas Boiler, Steve. Heater, Eh. 0 85 Locked at Time of hslimom 028 ExcesSivl Use of Mufopk Outlet Pegs ❑ 58. Dekcove Cooking lAd—Rwge, Hot Plate. Etc. ❑ $6. See Supplement Sheet 0 29. Lamps. Fixtures. Equpmerit. Etc.. Not Property Enclosed lHazardous ❑ 59 Gar Mete Blocked and& Obstructed/Not Protected Loations OnM1 0 60, Furnace. Boiler. Heating. Cooking arid/or Smokepge and Veit Poe 87 IN THE "ION OF THE INSPECTOR, THERE WERE NO HA2ARDOl1S 47 30. Dad and Unused W ft Should Be Its lowed Climaxes, From Combursoble Materials, Not Standard CONDITIONS IN THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS `• ,G�e-Ei 7��F5..5 `� %t�C"7 T / cs-�v L7f- G-� � C7G—, - G�/C . F,� %�i LYi �Err>.✓G 'TC OF L2!� Cc' 3 'l°l'Ci�/ : �` The conditions reported on #* form r celled the prornisis as observed by our inspector, at the tfms of Wispectim kliferriarrorrorthirthission ineWdirhg ti A safety or w dit rnw deep Ike preverAm are are not deerned the fault of the counity. OF INSPECTOR RECEIVED BY t FORM ES-1 7M M D D v v x x C DEPARTMENT OF FIRE AN"SCUE COUNTY OF FREDE P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 703.665.6350 DATE ARRIVAL DEPARTURE INSPECTORS NAME I TYPE OF INSPECTION I" krrCnenrhpod M D D Y Y H HM M H H M M (AST FIRST 1 /III I Ie-11I I I C� 7 C l� l / I�� IC II�LI I "1•21 2" sprwkbNse 3L"L- aUrm iYs+em 4L J ovemead door STREET NUMBER STREET NAME SUIT APT SRA I Ll -� �i-i-/ i I��1 I I I I I 1 I 1 i I I I I le l/ 1=5'I 5u newbwkls,q 6" Mwnwg permt 7" biasing 6"Axrwgeliori 9" tern tofu plan review OCCUPANT TELEPHONE I�I�r I��rl I�IC��I� f�-�I�I I�G^ICL•""-ii%I I I I I I I I I I I -I I I 1-1 I I I I MANAGER,REPRESENTATIVE8USINESS TELEPHONE I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1-I I I I-1 I I it" usensiauabon 12u ust leak 13l_J ust rertnvai 14 L—J ust kpud Wd BUILDING OWNERS LAST NAME OWNERS ADDRESS TELEPHONE FIXEDPROPERTY L I I 1 �lJ�-���"���'^ NUMBER OF STORIES 15" annual wspekbpn 16" caridain 17" vrdation ,/ CONSTRUCTION TYPE 1 1 t U hie resistive 3 protected non-combustrde 5 projected ordinary 7 protected wood frame 9 Lu rot dassAred 2 lu heavy timber 41 1 unprotected non<omWsnble 6 Lu unprotected ordinary 8 (u unprotected wood o t I vndebmvned IS lane krepaaOf 1 (u 19Are Oro opprovel FIRE PREVENTION PERMIT a RE -INSPECTION DATE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY LOAD 20" re-wspeclicin _ Y Y M M 0 D Y Y U 1—" u— I I I I I I I I I I I I 21 �.0 dher C!rf-�CCG INSPECTION GUIDELINE -CORRECTIONS REQUIRED The Following Conditions Need Corrections: I BUILDING EJLR AND EGRESS t ape a Detective Gas Connection E 1 Soace Under Stairs Used to Storage Purposes 9 Doses 0 3 t Inadequate Means of Egress �2 D a lkteriorated Vent F1pe on Gas Burnxq Apgkarde C 2 Broken Ceilings andor walls — Exposed Lath on Cnkngs and.a Wa#S 032 Second Means of Egress Not Readly Accessible 3 Farts andar Duct Systems Need Cleamq (Unnatural Openings) 033 Mies ardor Passageways Obstructed Stull Near Hot water Heater C 3 Defector and%or Unapproved Incinerator and%or Soark Arrestor Screen ❑ 34 Panic Hardware (Anti -Panic LatLtes and Brits) Required on Exit Doors C 4 Cardboard Cerkngs ardor Walls ❑ 35 Discharge From Exit Outside 8uidmg, Et, A AZARDS C 5 Fife Door Not Serviceable 036 Exitway Blocked ands Obstruete0 65 Cardrtans C 6 Fire Door Blocked a Wedged Open 037 Exit Door Locked and or Barricaded 0 66 oar Swage C 7 aI Soaked Wood Fleas C 38 Eden Na Property Designated a Marked ❑ Swage 0 Flea Ohs, Ckanitq Conipourds. Waxes. Pokpies. Etc. G 8 Amc Areas Open b the Outside. Screen b Prevent Entry by Bids C 39 Exit Lights Provided But Not Operative r Swage of Excelsior. Straw. Sawdust. Burlap, Etc C 9 Doors Reguinng Self -Closing Devices Not So Equipped ❑ 40 Iaum nating Dnechonai Signs fp Exits Reordered 69 Metal Drip Parts Required. But Not Provided O 10 Fton0ltive—Should Be Razed 041 Exit Door Swaging Against Lire of Exit Travel G 70 Excessive Grease on Sbve G 11 Open all Exposed Foundation Beneath Budkq 042 Stairways; Na Property Enclosed aMar Equipped Non ❑ )t Cockbh Carer Ohl G t 2 Post Max Occupancy Load ❑ 13 Stairways Not Ropery Iltlriknaed 0 72 lMa Unapproved lash Cuxttaiers ❑ 44 Emergency Whet Lights ELECTRICAL G t 3 regal and or Boot -Leo Wnnq C 14 Inadequate Service ardor Irsul6ctenl Culls FIRE ❑ 45 Fie Extinguishers Required. But Not Provided SPECIAL HAZARDS ❑ 73 Un Unnecessary anDisorderly AccumiAabon of Boxes, Cartons, Etc.. Collapse —Maintain Orderly Arrangement C 15 Insufficient Receptacles 016 Detecove. Deteriorated or Soaked Wing C 46 Fie Extinguishers Need RechrgngrInspection 047 Unapproved Type Fire Exbnrgushers 074 9" n Hazardous Locabort, "No Smo4q" Signs Needed ❑ 75 Flammable Liquids ands r Gases Being My Used ardor Shred ❑ 17 Defective and%or Broken Fixtures 018 Detective andor Broken Switches and%or Sockets C 48 Fire Extinguishers Na Property Mourned C-60' ❑ 49 Fire Exonguisners Not Flea" VsAle ❑ 76. Storage of omforeon n Hazardous location I abort ❑ 77 of Compressed GasCyN 1ers Wa pill Roper Anchorage Ilbcla a t C 19 Circuit Breakers By -Passed a Blocked Open ❑ 50 Stand" Hale DeterroraedrNot Racked Sage ❑ 20 Oversize Fuses and Circuit Breakers Set Too High ❑ 21 Pennies Behind Rug Type Fuses g C 51 Fie Protection System ❑ 52 Detective Standape Nozzles 0 78 Oxygen Cylinders Being Stored andr r Used n Greasy a QN loatau 022 Metal Strip of Fuse Holder Cut Back ❑ 53 Stardw System Dscortnectd dM ❑ 79 Oxygen Materials Berg $wee With Acids. e 1p Fuel Gas Cylinders; C 80 Being Shed With Sulphur, Etc 023 Fuses Jumped a Br ed 'd9 024 Open Junction Box and or Fuse Box 054 Sprinkler Heads. Cut-0fhs a Siamese Blocked 055 Inadequate Spnnkler Head Clearance 08 riches Required) ❑ 81 Unapproved ardor Hazardous Paint Spraying ed and Unapproved o prays 082 lash Room Door Not Equipped With Self -Closing Device C 25 Fuse Panel Obstructed and%or Inaccessible 3T 056 Sprinkler Valves Not Property idenbhed 0 83, Open Flame Heating in Hazardous Location ❑ 26 Moles and%or Fars Dirty or Dust Covered 027 Unapproved Extension Cords/Drop Cads HEATING AND COOKING C B4 Vacant at Time of Irspecbon 028 Excessive Use of Muf he Outlet Pkps ❑ 57 Detective Heating Unn—Furnace. Gas Brier, Sim, Hearer, Etc ❑ 58. Defective Cookdeg UM —Range. Hot Pat, Etc 0 85 Locked of Tune of Inspection 0 BE See Supplement Sheet O 29. Lamps. hidures, EguipnerrL Etc.. Not Property Enclosed (Hazardous 0 59 has Meter Blocked artier Obstrucled7Not Proiftl ed Locates Ong) 4D 30 Dead and Unused WfrYg; Should Be Removed ❑ 60. Furnace. Boer. Healing. Coo and%or Smokeppe and Ndrit Pipe Clearances. From Combstible Materials, Not Standard 87 IN THE OPINION OF THE INSPECTOR, THERE WERE NO HAIAHDOUS CONDMDNIS IN THIS AREA AT THE TIME OF THIS INSPECTION COMMENTS,`-- /'r/cT C.�,k,' ✓G' f-�J,-� % ilia= �/✓ 7�s !-- — ✓// /% ./�C'G' � �i�%/.C� o err 5 The wridioons reported on this loan rellect the promisis as obeerved by otar inspector, at the Yore of lnspecfion. Any em n or ommisslon regarding 61q safely or conditions I Idh fire pretill dos am unintentional and one not deemed the faun of the county. OF INSPECTOR IF RECEIVED BY FOFM ES-1. -/ U • COUNTY of FREDERICK i Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering & General Services 703/665-5643 FAX: 703 / 678-0682 FREDERICK COUNTY ENGINEER 9 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET, 2ND FLOOR WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 665-5643 DATE: June 13, 1991 PROJECT: Kraft/General Foods Beverage Plant Fort Collier Industrial Park Route 11 North Frederick County, Virginia DESIGNER: Sverdrup Corporation COMMENTS 1. 2. eP For the most part, the comments provided by VDOT have been adequately addressed with the following exceptions: a. The tapered section shown on the north side of the truck access drive off of Park Center Drive needs to be shown as 50'. Sheet C-3 a. Indicate location of outfall pipe from oil separator. b. Consider increasing width of dumpster pad to accommodate limited maneuvering room. Sheet C-5 a. Show location and extent of outfall pipe from oil separator. 9 North Loudoun St. P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 I J 0 0 June 13, 1991 Kraft/General Foods Beverage Plant Page Two b. Provide hydraulic calculations for piping and area associated with concrete pavement feeding oil separator. 4. Sheet C-0 a. Provide pavement calculations for concrete and bituminous sections. b. Provide calculations to substantiate the use of #5 dowels - 2'-6" long on 24" centers for the expansion ,joints. 5. Sheet C-10 a. Provide a detail to clarify note concerning temporary sediment cleanout and overflow structure. b. Indicate requirements for anchoring riser (i.e. buoyant uplift forces, etc.). Ha ey Strawsnyder, r., E. f EngineerinDire County of Frederick Application Date: 3/27/91 Issuance Date ... Building Permit Permit 0000366 - 91 Date: 3/27/91 Owner: General Foods, Inc. Site Address: Route 11 North Jim Effler Phone: Zip: Phone: Zip: Contractor: Rentenbach Constructors Description of Lot and Location GPIN#/Nap No: Health Permit No.: District: Lot No.: Section: Floodplain: Sub -Division: Block No.: Bldg No.: Area: Zoning: Set -Backs: Front: Back: CUP#: Left: Right: Site Plan#: Directions To Site: Rt. 11 turn R. onto Dirt Road between Theatre and body shop store, go approx. 1/4 mile across RR tracks Use Group: Use Code: Const. Type: Square Footage: 135870 Building Permit Bldg. Size 450 X 280 Basement Crawlspace Const. BLOCK Truss Roof YES Conn. Roof Floor Jois SLAB Floor Cov. Exterior W CONCRETE Covering Interior W Covering # Stories # Bedrooms # Bathroom Total# Ras Occup Load Note SHELL ONLY Note Note Note Note Value of Job: Total Fees: Applicant S-22-91 DATE I hereby agree to comply with all provisions of the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and the Zoning Ordinance as adopted by the County of Frederick. Q . Zoni q9 Adminis torT10 Z g otj i"fD,jl D E BOCA Review Sheet Permit 0000366 - 91 Concrete and Steel Construction Type 2-C Construction (Unlimited Area) USE GROUP F-I (Factory) Tabular Area: Unlimited area (Note: This structure exceeds tabular area allowed by table 501 for 2-C construction. Therefore it shall comply with Section 504.0 unlimited area. It shall be constructed of noncoabustible materials, shall not exceed one story or 85 ft. in height and be equipped throughout with an automatic sprinkler system. The total area of this structure is 136,115 sq. ft.) Note: Being I have not seen a site plan the min. setback distance for 0 hr rating on exterior walls is a min. of 50 ft. from lot lines and 50 ft. from lot line of building on the same lot. Min. frost protection in Frederick County Virginia is 24 inches. This review is for Footer, Foundation Only, a complete review will take place when site plan and structural and floor plan is submitted. This is not an electrical, mechanical, or plumbing review. u v Szo�' ,r 41470��n remit -i r- F,'*" SUBJECT To BOCAREVIEW REPORT Notice An approved set of plans must be kept on the job site. failure to have plans may result in the rejection of the scheduled inspection. PLAINS APPROVED FC? CONSTRUCTION FRV44AICK COUNTY, VA DEJ%ffTME9T OF INSPECTIONS POSSIBLE OMMISSIONS OR DELETIONS FROM ANY PART OF THE MANDATED CODE NOT SHOWN ON PLANS MUST BE CORRECTED WHEN DETECTED AND WHEN BUILDING IS INSPECTED, - Handicap: Shall comply with ANSI 2pecifications for making buildings and facilities accessible to and usable by physieWll \,J)} tdicap people. N WSW awwv Cn�•=W Z�ZO'aN n. N� �'D v as w ° Z C O=0. YLU a X DRAWN CHECKED DATE PROJECT SHEET NUMBER S 10-1,11 COUNTY of FREDERICK Building Inspections Kenneth L. Coffelt — Director of Code Administration 703/665-5656 FAX: 703/ 667-0370 This office will he�ehy issue a footer/foundation for permit # located at _R?(- ' / / IV F , in the Magisterial District. ,l� The renaming structural permit will not be issued until you have received your site plan approval. LET IT BE KNCWN that you are proceeding at your own risk and expense with this ter/foundation. T, �u/� z el —fully understand the above mentioned aphs. ^-2 -9j DATE STATE OF VIRG= CO= OF FREDERICK . I,�f'�Q�-� x�h-- , a Notary Public in and for the state and county aforesaid, do hereby certify that j Q &?"s � ��� whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated p/ has personally appeared.before me and acknowledged the same in my state and county foresaid. Given under my hand this day of Marc L My ccannission expires on 9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 ' - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VI IA U _ S��o(3-�I DEPARTMENT OF INSPECTIO S Caller is KT Cw-rT'Ei�_, Time Called 20",, Date Called I() Phone No. - 04�4 Time Requested Date Requested i' o / 9 19 Received By Att-J 014a1Z _ Date of Inspection i Jiq'9 PERMIT HOLDER NAME FIT. NO. 13Z-2- Lot No. 40 SEC. No. SUBDIVISION F" KT Cw_. iefK Imo. III"Y�I�: STREET NAME %IiLST' & OOK R!:) / ?fiRK ( be, DIRECTIONS +j N i-uP_0 rIsItl ' nA--p �a2►c BUILDING NO. l (-ti m2C _T)kI%J J;- P&&-r 77+C- 0L-D PLUMBING NO. b21yL -ltJ -[l-t>✓i° ME- KkAff—F Z60JO-2AFL ELECTRICAL NO. rm� RL_D T 6►J cbieoc- - Ot= MECHANICAL NO. CCT.�1"2E WG5'( �f�UU�L SIGN NO. DISTRICT PERMIT FOR: Type of Inspection Residential Footers Slab Water Sewer _ Rough Plumbing Groundworks Other: Setbacks: FR _ Draintile Service Rough Electric Rough Mechanical Gas Piping/Test Commercial BK L Gas Fire -up Framing Final Final Building Final Plumbing Time In: j /aM, Temperature 5 i" Time Out: it)' 05 awl Weather Results: Approved F�c_ TEKr_VFFIeE Rejected Comments: F Cut in No R Final Electrical Final Mechanical Site Plan Fire Marshall Special/Complaint 0131111111111 Signature V Date I 0. • WINCHESTER-FREDERICK COUNA ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 12 Rouss Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 (703)665-0973 May 21, 1991 Robert Watkins Director, Planning Dept., County of Frederick 9 S. Loudoun Street Winchester, VA 22624 Dear Bob, MAY 21in illj �l �✓ The attached letters are self explanatory and a real tribute to our community and to the people who direct its activities. I too share Ed's appreciation of the community effort that went into this project and I thank everyone. This is the kind of effort that makes things happen and I hope this will continue on. Very Truly Yours, George L. Romine cc: Richard G. Dick, Chairman, Winchester -Frederick EDC The Honorable Elizabeth Helm, Mayor, City of Wincheste The Honorable Kenneth Stiles, Chairman, Frederick County Board of Supervisors John S. Riley, Administrator, County of Frederick Wellington Jones, Engineer/Director, County of Frederick Sanitation Authority Ed Daley, Manager, City of Winchester June M. Wilmot, Executive Director, EDC Jesse W. Moffett, Director, Public Works, City of Winchester "Why Not Go To The Top" Winchester - Frederick County - The Top of Virginia ItINCHESTER-FREDERICK COUOY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 12 Rouss Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 (703) 665-0973 May 21, 1991 Mr. E.J. Slavik Sr. Engineering Consultant Kraft General Foods 250 N. Street White Plains, N.Y. 10625 Dear Ed, Thank you very much for your letter and your kind comments are very much appreciated. It was a pleasure working with you in assisting your plant in coming to the Winchester —Frederick County area. If I can be of further use please let me know, but I hasten to assure you that you are in good and capable hands with June M. Wilmot the new Executive Director of the Winchester —Frederick County EDC. If you do come to Winchester any time I would love to have lunch with you or just visit. Very '?'ly Yours, �0� /_,f ��L.�ine i cc: Richard G. Dick Wellington Jones John S. Riley Jesse Moffett Elizabeth Helm Kenneth Stiles Ed Daley Robert Watkins June M. Wilmot "Why Not Go To The Top" Winchester - Frederick County - The Top of Virginia 4 0 0 KRAFT GENERAL FOODS G1 Nf RAI f C ODS t May 9, 1991 Mr. George L. Romine WINCHESTER - FREDERICK COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 1.2 Rouss Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 Dear George: It is now official! We closed on Monday and now own the site in Ft. Collier Industrial Park. I was getting very nervous about the delays in the legal process, as you can imagine. On behalf of the business unit, the operations function, and all of General Foods USA, I want to thank you for your part in helping to make this all come together. You and your economic development team did a fine job of coordinating visits, getting answers to our questions, and in general representing the Winchester area. I have enjoyed working with you, George, and I appreciate the hospitality you showed me and the other representatives of General Foods USA. It was also a pleasure to work with John Riley, please pass along my thanks to him as well as to the rest of your team. I hope you are enjoying your second retirement George. I am sure it feels good to leave with a 'win". Best wishes to you, maybe we'll have a chance to get together when 1 visit our new plant. cc: L. D. Brown R. R. Chasse T. Richardt Sincerely, E. J. Slavik Sr. Engineering Consultant 6 NAY 3 1 1991 /`c l- COMMONWEALTH of VIRCjINIA LORD FAIRFAX SOIL AND WATER CONSER VATION DISTRICT 2045-B Valley Avenue Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 662-3312 May 30, 1991 ME14ORANDUM TO: Ed Strawsnyder, County Engineer, Frederick Co. FROM: James A. Hepner, Cons. Specialist, LFSWCD RE: KGF Beverage Plant Lord Fairfax Soil and Water Conservation District comments on the KFG Beverage Plant construction in Fort Collier Industrial Park, Winchester, Virginia. Stormwater management appears to be adequately addressed and supported by good mathematical calculations. Cover or "c" factors are realistic for pre and post construction cover conditions. The proposed use of an oil seperator in the detention basin most likely to receive pollutants is an excellant and necessary measure. The topography of the site indicates that drainage will be generally around and away from the geological depressions on the easterly side of the project. Stormwater flow after construction appears to be released at or less than the pre -construction 2 year storm event. Culverts all appear to handle the 10 year storm events. The total construction area is relatively flat. Erosion and sediment control measures for the project should be relatively simple to plan. The basic deficiency with the plan submitted for comments to the Conservation District is that there is no formal Erosion and Sediment Control Plan as prescribed by Virginia State Law. Most sorely missing is a narrative following the guidelines set forth in the VA. Erosion Handbook, Chapter 6. Most importantly missing is the 1) soils information, 2) description of adjacent areas, 3) erosion and sediment control measures, 4) i 0 Memorandum Ed Strawsnyder May 30, 1991 N permanent stabilization, and 5) maintenance of sediment and control structures. All the above listed requirements are shown on the checklist sheet on page VI -II of the Virginia E & S Handbook. A map labeled "E & S Plan" should be included in the plan showing locations of E & S practices with appropriate identification symbols and an accompanying legend. in -as -much as the project is well under construction and the previous positive points are well considered concerning the stormwater manage- ment aspect of the plan and the favorable lay of.the land cessation of work on the project would not be recommended or necessary. However, a proper E & S Control Plan would be appropriate if a totally acceptable plan were to be desired by Frederick County. I would like to add that Tom Tanveer, and Walter have been most helpful and cooperative with us in comment process and expressed a willingness to do necessary to comply with the erosion and sediment requirements. ames A. Hepner onservation Specialist Lord Fairfax SWCD CC. Frank Sherwood, Dir., Frederick Co., LFSWCD Sverdrup Corporation File of Sverdrup Corporation, this pre -review whatever is control 1] July 11, 1991 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Department of Planning 9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Re: General Foods Site Plan 17555.132 Dear Evan, ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS With Ed Strawsnyder on vacation at the time of plan resubmission for the above referenced project, and the desire for the County to expedite issuance of the building permit, we were asked to review the resubmission and give our opinion as to whether Ed's comments of 6/15/91 have been adequately addressed. I am working on the assumption that Ed has already reviewed the stormwater management system and generally approves the concept and design. Also, since the project is currently under construction, I am assuming that erosion and sedimentation protection measures are in place and working to the satisfaction of the County Inspector. My review comments or findings are as follows: l.a The 50 foot pavement tapers are indicated on the revised plans. 2.a (Sheet C-3) The location of the oil separator and outfall has been shown on the plan. It is not clear to me as to the purpose of the small retention sump at the discharge of the oil separator. As shown on the plan, this sump appears to be a permanent retention pit which will control the normal water level in the oil separator to a higher elevation than what appears to be intended. Also, the discharge from this retention pit is not a designed controlled discharge. This I have a problem with. The 684 contour around the sump and the end of the parking lot need to be corrected and the spillway for this sump designed to control the potential for erosion, and perhaps even dewater if a normal pool is not part of the environmental design. An indicated purpose for the retention pit would also be appropriate. 2.b The dumpster pads have been widened. 3.a (Sheet C-5) See 2.a above. .' 16 ■ 11240 Maples Mill Road, Suite 100, Fahfiiz, Virginia 22030 ■ 703.385.3566 ■ Fax 70J385.8319 Printra(,m r�, ti. rrrcrlyd /nq�rr 0 0 6.n�XU ENGINEERS AR HITE TS 3.b The calculations for the truck pad drainage system is provide and adequate. rJ SCIENTISTS 4.a (Sheet C-8) Calculations are provided for the onsite pavement sections. The sections are based on an assumed CBR of 6. Although onsite pavement design parameters are generally not a requirement of public agencies, for pavement duration the owner/designer may wish to re-evaluate the pavement design if the subgrade provides a CBR of less than 6. 4.b Calculations for the placement and sizing of the load transfer dowels in the pavement joints were not provided. However, the size and spacing was increased to 114 inch dowels spaced at 12 inches on center. It is my opinion that unless there is a problem with the subgrade, then dowels should be more than adequate. 5.a (Sheet C-10) Although it is not labeled as such, the detail on sheet C-7 for the outlet box shows a riser section with trash rack and the 3 inch hole as described in the note. I suggest filter stone be placed around the 3 inch hole to further reduce the free flow of sediment into the structure. The detail should indicate that the riser section is temporary and is to be removed from the 15" RCP upon completion of construction. 5.b (Sheet C-7) The temporary riser pipe is shown as embedded 6 inches deep into a concrete pad of sufficient size to keep it from floating. Most of Ed's comments have been addressed. I feel that with the clarification of my comments found in 2.a and 5.a above, the plans can be approved. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely 7& ASSOCIATES, INC. ,4,4-4 Paul A. Bernard, P.E. Project Manager PAB/j la R/F/AJ2/j �tl DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER Fax - (703) 984-9761 June 17, 1991 Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager Ref: Kraft/General Foods Beverage Plant Sverdrup Corporation Fort Collier Industrial Park 801 North 11th Route 11 North St. Louis, MO 63101 Frederick County Dear Mr. Cutter: We are in receipt of the above referenced project's revised site plan dated June 5, 1991. All of our recommendations of May 29, 1991 appear to have been addressed. However, we requested four (4) sets of revised plans be resubmitted for approval, but received only one (1). For this reason we will be unable to offer our approval of the plan until our requirements are fully met. Should you have any questions concerning the above, please give me a call. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer �� f�-(fit.- ✓� /-_/. �J� l ` if..�__r ._.__ By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC / rf Attachment xc: Mr. D. W. Hawkins Mr. Robert W. Watkins Attn: Mr. Evan Wyatt C01_'vi1'y10N_WEr'=H of DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 Fax - (703) 984-9761 June 26, 1991 2 7 1991 WILLIA`i H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENG ':EcP Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager Ref: Kraft/General Foods Beverage Plant Sverdrup Corporation Ft. Collier Industrial Park 801 North llth Street Route 11 North St. Louis, �10 63101 Frederick County Dear Mr. Cutter: T1:1=- i _ ackro.ci:_ c r , _,Ji?:a of your r`�vi :�ecl sic , I lans t.:) the rr f �r�nced proje _t dat:-d June 5, 1991. The plans appear to be satisfactor,: and are approved. Please advise the owner accordingly. r-.w c ;n� _rn over the a c .1-1 rave ,ent 17-0, Pa_ Cc_!a�2_ Dr;-. _. Ti:_ C_)trt, Frederick's contractor, L. F. Franklin & Sons, Inc., is chdigated to install a right turn lane taper at this lcr_ation. Your site pl.3n calls for the thi right turn Ian-- through the main ent-r-1 •e cf :�:,__ facility at Stati:_>; 13-E1. As you can see, if paver.,ent is places. at different tires 11 jcint will result. For this reason we would suggest your client and Frederick County ccerdinating the construction of the entrance offset and right turn lane, to p ;%-ide for a sm-,other riding surface. Through a copy of this letter to the Cownt•: Engineer we are apprising him of our concern. Should you have any questions concerning the above or if we may be of further assistance, please give me a call. Sincerely, William H. Bushr.Lin Trans. Resident Engineer Bv: Rcl�ert B. Childress Htcy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC rf Enclosure Yc : Mr. D .ci ght. W. Hai•:kins (w / cope of plans) Mr. Robert W . Watkins, Attn : Mr. Egan Myatt %1r. H. Ed Strawsnvder L. F. Franklin & Sons, Inc. Perry Engineering Company, Inc. RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER COMINIONWEALTI--I of VIRG.I.NIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 Mr. George Cutter, Project Manager C/o Sverdrup Corporation 801 North lath St. Louis, Mo 63101 Lear Mr. Cutter: (703) 984-4133 May 29, 1991 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Ref.: Kraft/General Foods Beverage Plant Fort Collier Industrial Park Route 11 North Frederick County As requested we have reviewed the above referenced project site plans dated FeLruary -6, 1 9i. our recommendations may be found on the enclosed plans marked in red and as follows: 1. Overall the service entrance on Hest Erooke Road appears adequate, however, its width should be increased to a minimum 54' from face to face of curb. To accommodate truck traffic, the northern service entrance on Park Center Drive should also be widened to a minimum 54' with _25' C & G-o radii. Fifty (501) foot asphalt tapers should be provided at these t::o (2.) entrances. The parking lot entrance on Park Center Drive should be widened to a minimum 34' width from face to face of curb with 25' C & G-6 radii. The radii curb and gutter should be extended westward as noted to connect with that within the parking lot. The southern taper should be adjusted to tie into the proposed right turn lane to west Brooke Road and the northern taper lengthened to 100'. This will provide for a continuous right turn lane through this entrance. 3. The proposed pavement design appears adequate. However, a half typical section should be incorporated into the plans which details a 12' pavement offset from the edge of the roadway pavement to the face of the gutter pan. Entra-ce pine sizes and lengths should be adjusted as noted and f_ar.^_a enni sc'_,tions kStan_da="d E7-1 ) added. Drainage along the western side of Park Center Drive is to be intercepted by the roadside ditch and detention basin. The following note will need to be incorporated into the plan: "The Virginia Department of Transportation will not be held responsible for any maintenance of and/or liabilities resulting due to the existence of the on, site stormwater detention pond. TR_.',1Zo1FT4\T10'.: F^,c THE 21c- .;T,-. 0 Mr. George Cutter May 29, 1991 Page Two 6. The locations of the proposed water and gas service lines under Park Center Drive will need to be adjusted to accommodate the wider service entrance. 7. The enclosed specifications are to be incorporated into the plans. Please revise and resubmit four (4) sets of blueprints for final approval. Should any changes be deemed necessary, please design them to meet or exceed the above recommendations. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to give me a call Sincerely, William H. Bushman, P.E. Transportation Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & subdivision Specialist senior RBC/sl Enclosures xc : nr . Li . b . uianiona Mr. D. W. Hawkins Mr. R. W. Watkins, Jr. L. F. Franklin & Sons, Inc. Mr. John Popovich Mr. John Whitacre MAY 3 01991 COMMONWEALTI-I of VIRGINIA _ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER ( 703 ) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER May 29, 1991 Mr. Frederick Franklin, Pres. Ref: Proposed Secondary Street Connection L. F. Franklin & Sons Kraft/General Foods P. O. Box 138 Project #1323-034-219, M501, FS710 Clearbrook, VA 22656 Route 11 North Frederick County Dear Mr. Franklin: Enclosed you will find the approved Land Use Permit #855-01474 to cover construction activities within the Route 11 right-of-way in conjunction with the referenced project. Should you have any questions concerning the permit requirements, please give me a call. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer r i � By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC / rf Enclosure xc: Mr. D. W. Hawkins / NIr. R. W. Watkins,/ �lr. H. E. Strawsnvder TR-RI'>T!(- - -- - COMMONWEALT I ®f VIRCI�TIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 E RA`! D. PETHTEL DINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER (703) 984-4133 Fax - (703) 984-9761 September 30, 1991 kw� C--V" -- WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Mr. H. Ed Strawsnyder, P.E. Ref: Ft. Collier Industrial Park/Kraft Foods Director of Engr. & General Services Project #1323-034-219, M501 County of Frederick Frederick County P. 0. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Dear Ed: I am writing in response to our final inspection of the referenced project on September 26, 1991. As discussed it appears the roadway construction and Route 11 improvements have been satisfactorily completed in accordance with the approved plans. Should you have any questions or require anything further, please let me know. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Sr. RBC / rf xc: Mr. D. W. Hawkins Mr. R. W. Watkins Mr. James L. McIlvaine, Jr. L. F. Franklin & Sons TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CE`;TURY SPA 013-�I c jP21W COMMONWEALTH of VIRCIN1A DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN COMMISSIONER ( 703 ) 984-4133 RESIDENT ENGINEER Fax - (703) 984-9761 October 18, 1991 Mr. Don McIlvaine Ref: Kraft/General Foods Beverage Plant Suite 600 Ft. Collier Industrial Park 6231 Leesburg Pike Route 1323 Falls Church, VA 22044 Frederick County Dear Don: I am writing in response to our telephone conversation of October 17, 1991 concerning the referenced project. As said we are very concerned with the way in which Sverdrup's site contractor Perry Engineering Company tied into both Park Center Drive and West Brooke Road. I realize Perry still has some remaining work to perform, however, there are several areas which have been completed which do not drain properly; specifically at the main entrance to the Kraft facility and at the Park Center Drive and West Brooke Road intersection. There is a precise statement on Sheet C-3 of Kraft's approved site plan concerning positive roadway drainage along the Kraft site. In a related matter the stone shoulders have not been properly replaced/constructed adjacent to this site's entrances and right turn lane on Park Center Drive. Perry's site superintendent contends they are not responsible for construction of any shoulders along the roadways. However, again I must refer to the Kraft site plan which clearly specifies an 8' shoulder along the Kraft site. Regardless, I would think Kraft would want their points of access completely finished to enhance the overall appearance of their new facility. Furthermore, these items will need to be addressed prior to acceptance of these roadways into our State Secondary Road System. Should you have any questions concerning the above or would like to meet to discuss the matter, please give me a call. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior BBC / rf xc: hlr. Dwight W. Hawkins Mr. Robert W. Watkins Mr. H. Ed St raw Snyder Mr. George Cutter Mr. Kevin Firebaugh TRANSPORT ATIO% 09 TN" `%- z• JCCAZ s P. ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS 11240 Waples Mill Road Suite 100 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement General Foods Site Plan Review Project Manager 5.5 hrs @33.25 Admin. Assistant .5 hrs @14.50 Total Direct Total Indirect Mileage 47 mi @ $0.28 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE Date: July 11, 1991 Please Reference: Project No. 17555.132 Invoice No. 9104546 Client No. 07534 182.88 7.25 190.13 285.19 475.32 13.16 $ 488.48 •319� yak----- ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS 11240 Waples Mill Road Suite 100 Fairfax, Virginia 22030 703.385.3566 Evan Wyatt, Planner Frederick County Planning Department 9 Court Square, Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Your Authorization: Signed Agreement General Foods Site Plan Review Project Manager Admin. Assistant 5.5 hrs @33.25 .5 hrs @14.50 Total Direct Total Indirect Mileage 47 mi @ $0.28 TOTAL DUE THIS INVOICE Date: July 11, 1991 Please Reference: Project No. 17555.132 Invoice No. 9104546 Client No. 07534 Copy To: v 7. f a qDivision fz-44 -^ 182.88 7.25 190.13 285.19 475.32 13.16 $ 488.48 • EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE GENERAL FOODS February 25, 1991 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this project is to rough grade approximately 7 acres of a proposed 20 acre industrial site of existing pasture land. The proposed site is located in Frederick County on the southeast side of the Chessie System Railroad and the western side of Red Bud Run. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The proposed site is presently a field of grasses and high weeds. The area to be disturbed consists of moderately sloped pasture type land with slopes from 2.0% to 7.0% with an existing wide flat swale traversing the southwest corner of the lot. This swale flows easterly approximately 1500 ft. to Redbud Run, 1350 ft. Interstate 81. ADJACENT PROPERTY The site is located in the Fort Collier Industrial Park and is bounded on the north by the Chessie System Railroad and on the remaining three sides by proposed additional lots intended for similar construction. SOILS The soil types consist of Frederick-Poplimento Loams, Frederick-Poplimento Loams (very rocky), Frederick-Popli - mento rock outcrop complex and Opequon Chilhowie silty clays (very rocky). Typically, the surface layers of the Frederick- Poplimento loams is 5 to 7 inches thick. The subsoils extend to depths of 50 to 60 inches. It is a yellowish brown red clay loam. The substratum is red and brown silty clay loam. The Frederick-Poplimento loams (very rocky) have a dark brown loam surface layer of about 7 inches. The subsoil extends to 60 inches or more and varies from yellowish red silty clay loam at 12 inches to mottled clay and yellowish red or broan silty clay at 60 inches. The Frederick -Popli - mento rocky outcrop has a surface layer of 5 to 7 inches of dark brown loam. The subsoil extends to 50 or 60 inches with subsoil. of yellowish to strong brown subsoil. of silty clay loam. The Opequon-Chilhowie-silty clays (very rocky) have a surface layer of 3 inches of dark yellowish brown silty clay loam. The subsoil is brown silty clay loam and reddish brown clay to a depth of 15 inches where limestone bedrock may be encountered. The permeability of the Opequon Chilhowie soil. is moderate and the erosion factor varies from 0.32 to 0.37. The permeability of the Frederick - Poplimento soils is slow at 7 inch depth and moderately rapid below 7 inches. The erosion factor varies from 0.24 to 0.32. j ; L = � i-_, FEB 2 7 199I U i CRITICAL EROSION AREAS There are no critical erosion areas on this site due to the sheet flow runoff and wide flat swales at the points of discharge. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES All vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control practices will be constructed and maintained according to minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES 1. STRAW BALE BARRICADE - 1.05 Straw bale barriers will be placed along the southeast property line to detain sediment from the areas not protected by the proposed berm and silt fence. 2. Silt Fence - 1.06 A temporary sediment barrier consisting of a filter fabric stretched across and attached to supporting posts and entrenched shall be placed along the edge of the disturbed area to prevent sediment from leaving the site. Silt fences shall. be inspected immediately after any rainfall and excess deposits immediately removed. 3. Temporary Fill Diversion - 1.16 A temporary fill diversion channel with supporting ridge will be cut along the north side to divert storm runoff away from the unprotected cut slope. 4. Diversion Channel - 1.18 A diversion channel shall be constructed along the southwest corner of the site to divert stormwater runoff away from the proposed temporary sediment trap. 5. _Temporary Sediment Trap - 1.25 A temporary sediment trap will be constructed at the southern end of the site to detain sediment laden runoff from the disturbed area long enough for the majority of the sediment to settle out. 6. Temporary Seeding - 1.65 Temporary seeding shall be installed in all disturbed areas proposed not to be paved immediately following rough grading of these areas to reduce erosion and sedimentation. All. seeding and mulching shall be accomplished in accordance with Std. and Spec. 1.65. MANAGEMENT STRATAGIES 1. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operations can begin and end as quickly as possible. 2. Sediment trapping measures shall. be installed as a first step in grading. 3. Temporary seeding or other stabilization shall follow immediately after grading. 4. The job superintendant shall be repsonsible for the installation and maintenance of all. erosion and sediment control practices. —� �, {„ 0 • STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater management will. not be required during the rough grading of the proposed site. However, stormwater management will be required at the time of development and will be provided on the final site plans. MAINTENANCE 1. The straw bale barrier and silt fences will be checked regularly for sediment cleanout. 2. The temporary sediment trap will be checked regularly and the excess sediment removed as soon as it reaches the cleanout elevation shown on the plan. 3. All seeded areas will be checked regularly to see that a good stand is maintained. Areas should be fertilized and reseeded as needed. 4. All seeded areas will be checked regularly to see that a good stand is maintained. Areas should be fertilized and reseeded as needed. 5. The stormwater management will be checked regularly and excess sediment removed when the cleanout elevation has been reached. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVE GENERAL FOODS February 25, 1991 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The purpose of this project is to rough grade approximately 7 acres of a proposed 20 acre industrial site of existing pasture land. The proposed site is located in Frederick County on the southeast side of the Chessie System Railroad and the western side of Red Bud Run. EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS The proposed site is presently a field of grasses and high weeds. The area to be disturbed consists of moderately sloped pasture type land with slopes from 2.0% to 7.0% with an existing wide flat swale traversing the southwest corner of the lot. This swale flows easterly approximately 1500 ft. to Redbud Run, 1350 ft. Interstate 81. ADJACENT PROPERTY The site is located in the Fort Collier Industrial Park and is bounded on the north by the Chessie System Railroad and on the remaining three sides by proposed additional lots intended for similar construction. SOILS The soil types consist of Frederick-Poplimento Loams, Frederick-Popl.imento Loams (very rocky), Frederick-Popli - mento rock outcrop complex and Opequon Chilhowie silty clays (very rocky). Typically, the surface layers of the Frederick- Poplimento loams is 5 to 7 inches thick. The subsoils extend to depths of 50 to 60 inches. It is a yellowish brown red clay loam. The substratum is red and brown silty clay loam. The Frederick-Poplimento loams (very rocky) have a dark brown loam surface layer of about 7 inches. The subsoil extends to 60 inches or more and varies from yellowish red silty clay loam at 12 inches to mottled clay and yellowish red or broan silty clay at 60 inches. The Frederick -Popli - mento rocky outcrop has a surface layer of 5 to 7 inches of dark brown loam. The subsoil extends to 50 or 60 inches with subsoil. of yellowish to strong brown subsoil of silty clay loam. The Opequon-Chilhowie-silty clays (very rocky) have a surface layer of 3 inches of dark yellowish brown silty clay loam. The subsoil is brown silty clay loam and reddish brown clay to a depth of 15 inches where limestone bedrock may be encountered. The permeability of the Opequon Chilhowie soil is moderate and the erosion factor varies from 0.32 to 0.37. The permeability of the Frederick - Poplimento soils is slow at 7 inch depth and moderately rapid below 7 in erosion factor varies from 0.24 to 0.32. CRITICAL EROSION AREAS There are no critical erosion areas on this site due to the sheet flow runoff and wide flat swales at the points of discharge. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES All vegetative and structural erosion and sediment control practices will. be constructed and maintained according to minimum standards and specifications of the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. STRUCTURAL PRACTICES 1. STRAW BALE BARRICADE - 1.05 Straw bale barriers will be placed along the southeast property line to detain sediment from the areas not protected by the proposed berm and silt fence. 2. Silt Fence - 1.06 A temporary sediment barrier consisting of a filter fabric stretched across and attached to supporting posts and entrenched shall be placed along the edge of the disturbed area to prevent sediment from leaving the site. Silt fences shall. be inspected immediately after any rainfall and excess deposits immediately removed. 3. Temporary Fill. Diversion - 1.16 A temporary fill diversion channel with supporting ridge will be cut along the north side to divert storm runoff away from the unprotected cut slope. 4. Diversion Channel - 1.18 A diversion channel shall. be constructed along the southwest corner of the site to divert stormwater runoff away from the proposed temporary sediment trap. 5. Temporary Sediment Trap - 1.25 A temporary sediment trap will be constructed at the southern end of the site to detain sediment laden runoff from the disturbed area long enough for the majority of the sediment to settle out. 6. Temporary Seeding - 1.65 Temporary seeding shall be installed in all. disturbed areas proposed not to be paved immediately following rough grading of these areas to reduce erosion and sedimentation. All seeding and mulching shall. be accomplished in accordance with Std. and Spec. 1.65. MANAGEMENT STRATAGIES 1. Construction shall be sequenced so that grading operations can begin and end as quickly as possible. 2. Sediment trapping measures shall. be installed as a first step in grading. 3. Temporary seeding or other stabilization shall. follow immediately after grading. 4. The job superintendant shall. be repsonsibl.e for the installation and maintenance of all erosion and sediment control practices. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Stormwater management will not be required during the rough grading of the proposed site. However, stormwater management will be required at the time of development and will be provided on the final site plans. MAINTENANCE 1. The straw bale barrier and silt fences will. be checked regularly for sediment cleanout. 2. The temporary sediment trap will. be checked regularly and the excess sediment removed as soon as it reaches the cleanout elevation shown on the plan. 3. All. seeded areas will. be checked regularly to see that a good stand is maintained. Areas should be fertilized and reseeded as needed. 4. All. seeded areas will be checked regularly to see that a good stand is maintained. Areas should be.fertil.ized and reseeded as needed. 5. The stormwater management will. be checked regularly and excess sediment removed when the cleanout elevation has been reached. ` 8 314 6*4119 SVERDRUP STL CON 06/050 12:31 003 CF' USA 141TVLkAGGS K(;r LEVER.(;; PLAN!' NARHA•r1VE FOR EROSION & SFI1fMLN''I' CONTROL PLAN I'rn'ect. Desc)tlon The purpose of tl,•is prr)jcct is rhr: ,_„nstrucLion ()i a new beverage far,iliL,y Lor Kraft Ce"Pral I' ��d:; L►SA. The site: of approximately 20 acres i:(; located rt•�,st of 1lol,l_C I I in Frederick County. '1'),e site is located in the. Corr. Coli it:r IfIdW,rr•ial Park, just northeast oL the C,'iLy of Winchester. The develc,l)mctnt will conAist Of a produc,Lion building with an atLacheCl of•fir_c, Pill -ki(I fr)r (•.,,,1)loyctes, truck luadin,g Arcas„acccSs rail spur. A LOtal ul aLrut►r 18 ac,rc, will be disturbed rlurinj, conslruc.l. ion. Fxisr.Irtg °iitc (;r,ndit ion, The Lopography of ct►c prop,- -d •; i Lc• i -�i rr,.l,hive [ f I.it Lu gently rollillp. The site w:�s 1nr:nerlr u�rcl a: i,rrt .;nrl is covr:•.red wi Lh a Lai r to guod stanc:l ul k - :�i: l)r•� ��,1 the fir,>. v.rr'y ir•nrn Lc.ss than one perc.enr Lo :-abuur 12 I,f r�RnL . I hr:re sumc srn., i 1 Ld areas with sli,l.,es greater rhan I', per(Lnt :„)n,e rock oraLcrohs. 1"40 cxi5ting n.;Lur►l swales drain Lhr• 14itrt r.iiviurd I,y ;) lino ri(jge. in tl,e center of the site-. Drain+age is sen( r;)l l y tC-lard Lhc: s•rut1)1?ast. There is a sLone L)ox c.ulvr-.,-t under Lhe CSX c,rilT IuLl t:!.ich r.u►)vcvs drainage f.l-om an oft site area of ; pp i ruxinlatcly ;4 •_rcrrj u►, Lh0 west side ol. the railroad into tlu souti,ern Swale ru„nin Ltit•ti LI)r t:ttc . '1n uLf i t c :ircji to the northwest of tht• sire, and c:it:t ,,1 thr c�li Iroa,l, dr,iins thru a r.},ird Swale which cuLs across the :,outhcr,, r.c;rnrr ,,l rite ;iLe. The developers of the industrial park have: proposed to combine the runoLL from these Lwo olisiLe areas and �I.isch,�r�r' ir. Lilru a 4 " culvert under proposed West Brooke Road rill the sou► hu;i,,►, ;id(: of t1lc sitrt. Ad'accnr Prope.rL I'Ire sire. i : lc:r<:.ated in rl,e fc�rL Collier Indusr.rial Park. Immediately adjacent pruperries r.o Lhc: n,::thc:�s[, ;uuthcasL n�i sottLhwesL will also he dr,velopr.r.1 as part Of Lhis indusLrial park. The sire. is houndr.d on r.he norLhwcst by .) CSX r:{i Iroac! [rack. 1'l r. property beyond Lhc track }, is hneri dove to c`.c; (,�r i n P du;trial uses *ail}t rFinaini rrk op�ri land. Soils The soi Is of Lhi; s i tc c`.t7;tr*, 7 sr. (nr i rr,ly of tfir� Prcdericl, — 1'oplimcnlo - Rock outcrop r:omplex. Tfle F'redcriok scries consists of very deep wr�l L drained soils ull Val icy uplands. I'hesc soils fornlod ill residuum of limestone. The Sul h:ic:.e laver i5 :, br7ul.'11 loam. Tho Surface layer is underlain by Soils whirl, ri:ni'=e fr,'-] clads to silty (;1ay loams, In area; whero rock Outcr,)ps du nor exist. Lhc deprh Lo hedrock can be greatcr than 60 inches, I'rrmcahi Lity is n,jdcrai.}cy slow f,,r I'o})limr.r,lo soiLs :and moderate for Predccick se,il,. 1•<;I,lime11LS(1rLe5 and Frederick serie,; aroo c lass i L iocl in ;rcup; C .yucl B r•Fspcct i vc ly. Thr erodibilil_y, K, for Lhcso. soil~ is i).32 iu rho Lop;r ii auk 0.7i1 in the suf_,soi 1 . t;riti�.a1 F:rvsiorl !1ro1S Nc> cxistin}; por4.rltiaily critical .lrPas wire iraenr.ified on this ;ile. Arcas of SLeep slopes arc, rcl:ar.ivc.i}l. P,[o.r,lial r'ritic;Ljl areas after };radirl,g would cc,r,si;t of the prrmrinrrit dilchc;. lute mash wi i.1 l,e use<J to minimize or„sior, in di ,_1)o unt i I the perrntnenl. Krass is esLablishcd. Erosion and Sediment Control Mnasulo.�: All vep•E•.Lative anc.l strut_ tl:r:.t l cr,,,•;ipr, :znd sedirnenr. control Practices w i [ 1 he construcLed :ind mrI jilt--' i nc•d according Lo nri rtimum Standards and spec.ifiCatforls OFc }. Erosioo and .,edirnent s Control Handbook. f' • 1'�� { IYyS i;j !^•'S y'. 'k. JlMr VrgeLativc. practices I. Topsoil Stockpile — 1.61 Topsoil shall he stripped lrrnn areas rc, be graded and SLuckpi led Lor laLcr u,r:. 5roc,kpilc: loraLions Sha11 hc. approved by the prOjeer. cnginoer. 2. .lute Mesh — 1 . 7 Jutc mesh or i,Lhcr degradAble _iiar,nel lining material sl,�A L1 hc. tiSed r.o a i d irr e1,Lilli1 tiri i ng 5s in dra rouge ditches as indi caLcd by ncrr.c:S ..,tt drat, i ng C—lo, Management SLrategie.s 1. Construction should bc, Sequent cd so r-haL grading opcvaLiuns c:an hop.iu and r r.d ns cluiLkly as possible. 2. ScdimetlL trapping, ,n,=aSutc Sii,iil l,e installed as a first step in gradin}; and sl,,{ L 1 I,,, seeciccl and mu lc..hed immediately Lollowing, insLallciLiun, 3. PCMLAtient seedinp or ori,( ,- st.al)i 1.i7.:rri,hall lr,lluw immediately alter krndinL�. 4. Areas which iri not r,i hr d:�truhi.rl shall bc- clr.arly marked by flags, r-Lf:. 5. The .job super.intcnclent slra I bv respon$ ibis for the installation and maLntc.n:.inccr of al] erosion and sediment control practice.S. r 3. P 4119 SVERDRUP ° STL CON 06i05i ' t; SLruct.ura l Tract ices 1. Sediment Basin - 1.26 A sediment basin i r.o be cnnsL r)"cord it, thr. east corner Of Lhe site as r1town on dr_n,in�, C-10. '11l i s basin will have a Lemporary corrugated ;Leei pile riser rur sediment control during; grAding operaLionn. ,1Lter Lhe situ iti :tabili7c'd Lhis hasin wi I ! be cr)nvL.rtnd Lu a pCrmancnr. dry-hcd storlm"iLer ncanakcnc.nc. u,tsi�c. ?. Si1L Fcncc - 1.06 A silt fe.r,ce is L,, be p I.tc:eci 1 urig rl,e [, ,rrheast .and snt1LheasL perimeLers of Lhe sire prior Lu Linal grading opo-raLions as shown r,n drx-ing (:-10 Si It Lcnce is also r(') be placed on Llie norLhcasI and r;oulhca;r. side of Lhe rough gradinK operation5 al. S1iown on dr,twinp C-9. 3. "I'Frnporary Consrrr.cr:tion F,rtr::,,;.e A tompurary ronnrrur:tio)i ertLt:ln, e S11-4I 1 be i,;5Lr111e.d for access to the cxisL1.ng },,i7avc,l scjrincr :;t the adjacr, L drive-in thcarre. 4. Construction R()ad '�I ah� Lip.:,, ic,p - 1,C) All roads and parking a I'r'as inn Lice ; i Le sica 1 1 be GLabilized wirh gravvl iari)i,rli.atoly .fir(,.r grading per notes on drawing C-10. �. SCOrmwaLer Conveyance Ch;innj2 I ; - 1,.i ) Permanent sLurmwaLer ch.grme L:�. ;ir(: c.') be corlsLrucl ed on the northeast and soulkc(i:tsr scd.,a ()t r.lcc s�tc These c.hanna.I.s will convey srcl invent. 1 adc:n 1-U1101 f Lo tljr:. sedi ment bas i n during, final graciir,k 0p0.r-;.cLns. a 314 0 4119 SVERDRUP STL CON 06/054 12:33 006 {w"x Permanent StahilizaLion All. areas disturbed by e.oristruc.r.i„m ,JL11 he SLabilizcd wiLh pe.rmanenr seeding immediately following finish grading. Seeding will be done with Kentucky Bluegrass Hcr.urding to .;Ld. & Spec.. 1.66 of the 1980 Virpinia Erosion and Sediment Control Ilrindhook. Permancnr.ly seeded areas shall be protected during estahli~hment s,irh Straw mulch, StorinwaLer ManaP-ement Runoii calculations were per furrncd tc,, de, -sign rho. required volume for the perrnarent dcroriL ion b isi n . Thc� i vAlu i red ;r.ormwatcr volurne was greater than Llie required sediment basin volume. 'I he re lure the }grading conLours shown on dr.-; i ngs C: -.i anc.l C- I.0 -Ipp 1 y to the final stormwatcr basin configuration. The stormwatcr hasin .ail l h:.rvk� ;r I5" rI2infOr,,.ed (_orj('-r2Le low—Llow Pipe wirh a c.oncrcl e box for at, emci nc:.� :;pillw.-rv. .''Ic' I)asin and r,uL let works h,ivc :;eer, do ;iy;ned to _ rL, i ni icv f rr,rri ti:c 10—year hcistdevelr,ped condiLic+n to the fJiscl+:Arg,, ratc for the _-\c_ar hredcveloped condition. Irr tlddir.ic,n, Llr\• learures and hrr'„osed 1()" RCP under Wcsr Broulcc Read ,,ill hk c,tp:ll, I+ l co+tvF.y i ng ti-:c Flow from a 100—year event wit}+out ovi.rLul?pin,, r h,_• ro.,cl. Runoff from offsite 1,'e:t. ;if Llie adjacent raj lroad and northwest Of the site will be conveyed r.hrru Lhe site in an 8 foot wide Flat hotLorn grass }fined channel. 'Phis Cirnnn[:•I '.;111 c-.r,riv(2y runo[L to the prnpobed 4,4" RCP under West Rrl)oke Rcrrid_ M o , ., r I general, all e.rGsiOI) :and scdimenL rnl. measures will be checked weFkl y and afLer cac;lr signi fic;ant rni n1.111. Tile Lol lowing items will he chechc.d in particular: 314 604119 SVERDRUP STL CON 06/05i0 12:33 0Ei'r 1- The sedimenL hasio will he Gleaned out when the Level of sedi menr buildup rrm:.hem 1.6 1 vK From L Ise Lop Or L Ise riser pipe. 2. The silt Lence will he chc`cked tvgulmt1y for unclermiuing. 3. 411 seeded areas will be Mcked regulArly to see that a good Yand is m;{ i nLa i nej. Areas shou k be Lcrtilized and reseeded as needed. t .. LAND DISTURBING PERMIT ISSUED TO • Howard Shockey & Sons who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. This agreement, made this 27th day of February , lg 91 r by and between Howard Shockey & Sons party(s) of the first part, and the County of Frederick, Virginia, party of the second part. Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for General Foods Manufacturing Building and the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction and before final occupancy, the party(s) of the first part or his heirs/ assigns agree to do the following work: 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction and to provide for conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. f 0 - 2 - M The party(s) of the first part does further agree that an agent of Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the approved plan. In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by Fred Ash, Project Manager and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. Howard Shockey & Sons Corporation BY: /t- Z��z 67 In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf by Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II County of Frederick, Virginia B Y : lit - lei Frederi k Coun Department of Planning & De elopment NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of a site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. - 3 - 0 STATE OF vIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK I, Renee' S. Arlotta , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my said County, Mr. Fred Ash, Project Manager of Howard Shockey & Sons amd Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II of the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated February 27, 1991 did personally appear before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this 27th day of February , 19 q 1. a,�� Not ry Put is 1My Commission expires on n r - • i LAND DISTURBING PERMIT ISSUED TO: Perry Engineering who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. This agreement, made this 19 92, by and between AGREEMENT 29th day of September Perry Engineering I party(s) of the first part, and the County of Frederick , Virginia, party of the second part. Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for the Kraft/General Foods Addition of S (actual disturbed acres) and the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction and before final occupancy, the party(s) of the first part or his heirs/assigns agree to do the following work: 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction and to provide for conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. LJ 0 -2- The party (s) of the first part does further agree that an agent of Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the approved plan. In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by Susan Fritch/Perry Engineering and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. Perry Engineering CORPORATION BY: 1,�- r In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf by Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II County of Frederick, Virginia J BY: UJCx, � . (, Frederick Co ty Department of Planning and Development NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of a site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. -3— STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICR I, Debi n_ Swiml ev , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my said County, (name) Susan Fritch of (company) Perry Engineering and Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II of the Frederick County Department and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated 9/29/92 did personally appear before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this 29th day of September 1992 . Notary Public My Commission expires on September 30, 1993 5P -013 -`1 LAND DISTURBING PERMIT ISSUED TO: Perry Engineering who has met all requirements of the Frederick County Erosion and Sedimentation Control Ordinance as certified by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. This agreement, made this 19 92 by and between AGREEMENT 29th day of September Perry Engineering party(s) of the f irst part, and the County of Frederick , Virginia, party of the second part. Whereas, in consideration of the approval by the party of the second part of this Virginia land disturbance plan and permit for the of 5 Foods Addition (actual disturbed acres) and the party of the second part requiring the following work to be completed during the land disturbance construction and before final occupancy, the party(s) of the first part or his heirs/assigns agree to do the following work: 1. Provide for the adequate control of erosion and sedimentation by temporary and permanent control practices and measures which will be implemented during all phases of clearing, grading and construction and to provide for conformity with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Law, Title 21, Chapter 1, Article 6.1 of the Code of Virginia and local code laws. 2. To provide Erosion and Sediment Control as per the Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan. 0 • -2- The party (s) of the first part does further agree that an agent of Frederick County shall be permitted entry to the site of the land disturbing activity to inspect the control measures shown in the approved plan. In testimony whereof, the party of the first part has hereunto caused its corporate names and seals to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf, by Susan Fritch/Perry Engineering and caused this agreement to be acknowledged and delivered for and in its behalf. Perry Engineering CORPORATION BY: In testimony whereof, the party of the second part has hereunto caused its body corporate names and seal to be hereunto affixed, for and in its behalf by Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II County off Frederick, Virginia BY: &aiv� t,L Frederick Co ty Department of Planning and evelopment NOTE: Issuance of this permit does not constitute approval of a site plan. This permit is for land disturbance only. -3- STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICR I , Debi D. Swi m1 .y , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do hereby certify that this day personally appeared before me in my said County, (name) Susan Fritch of (company) Perry Engineering and Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II of the Frederick County Department and Development, whose names are signed to the foregoing agreement dated 9/29/92 did personally appear before me and acknowledged the same. Given under my hand this 29th day of September 19 92 . �AJ�I �) . 6�V4. Notary Public My Commission expires on September 30, 1993