Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout005-08 I-81 Distribution Ctr. - 59 Acres RA to B3 - Stonewall - Backfileft w 0 m N 0 �i -- o/s , U °:8 rr U r L. kr) RECEIVED FROM ADDRESS —7 (; T ❑FOR RENT .. I FOR �Ll.�'Yl IiY�G QLJpDL --rl' W ► ` AMT. OF ACCOUNTAMT. PAID �ASH HECK �3 BALANCE MONEY 1 15 v M l90 O.LV DOLLARS $ 1 6 P V BY pV.v im 0 REZONING TRACKING :T Check List: Fee & Sign Deposit Application Form Deed L Proffer Statement t Plat/Survey Impact Analysis Taxes Paid Statement �- Adjoiner List Impact Model Run DATE (� 3 Application received/file opened Reference manual updated/number assigned �-� D-base updated �c C Copy of adjoiner list given to staff member for verification Four sets of adjoiner labels ordered from data processing Color location maps ordered from Mapping IF 1701 �. 2P a File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary PC public hearing date ACTION: BOS public hearing date ACTION: Signed copy of resolution for amendment of ordinance, with conditions proffered [if applicable], received from County Administrator's office and given to office manager for placement in the Proffers Notebook. (Note: If rezoning has no proffers, resolution goes in Amendments Without Proffers Notebook.) Action letter mailed to applicant Reference manual and D-base updated 3 • Z3 - d0 QX/ File given to office manager to update Application Action Summary (final action) a� p� File given to Mapping/GIS to update zoning map Zoning map amended U \Bev\Common\Tracking sheets\REZ_tracking wpd Revised 05/09/02 o E(0?Y CO 1of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 July 24, 2012 Stefanie L. Brennan, Esq. Pepper Hamilton LLP 3000 Two Logan Square 181h and Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799 RE: Zoning Certification 4027 Martinsburg Pike Property Identification Number (PIN): 33-A-110 Zoning District: B-3 (Industrial Transition) Dear Ms. Brennan: This letter is in response to your letter this office received on July 19, 2012, requesting a zoning certification of the above -referenced property. We have examined our records with respect to the property, and advise you, as of this date: The property identified as PIN 33-A-110, (the "Property"), is zoned B-3 (Industrial Transition) Zoning District and is subject only to the use restrictions generally applicable to that classification, which are contained in the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. The Property is subject to proffers assigned from Rezoning #05-08, approved by Frederick County on September 24, 2008, as well as proffers assigned from Rezoning #05-12, approved by Frederick County on May 23, 2012. (Copies enclosed.) The Property is currently in compliance with the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, with no violations, variances, or special exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact me at 540-665-5651. Sincerely, Mark R. Cheran Zoning Administrator Enclosures MRC/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 COM41JCOILICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 September 25, 2008 BPG Properties, Ltd. c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh, PC 4310 Prince William Parkway, Ste. 300 Prince William, VA 22192 RE: REZONING #05-08, BPG PROPERTIES, LTD./I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER Dear Mr. Coughlin: This letter serves to confirm action taken by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors at their meeting of September 24, 2008. The above -referenced application was approved to rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers, for office and warehouse uses. The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route I 1 intersection with Cedar Hill Road (route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District, and are identified with Property Identification Numbers 33-A-109 and 33-A-110. The proffer dated June 19, 2008 and last revised September 17, 2008, that was approved as a part of this rezoning application, is unique to this property and is binding regardless of ownership. Enclosed is a copy of the adopted proffer statement for your records. Please do not hesitate to contact this office if you have any questions regarding the approval of this rezoning application. Sincerely, - 6 7 Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Planning Director MRT/bad Attachment cc: Robin & Kay Boyce, PO Box 67, Clearbrook, VA 22624 Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Stonewall District Supervisor Gary Oates and Richard Ruckman, Stonewall District Planning Commissioners Jane Anderson, Real Estate Commissioner of Revenue 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 0 0 REZONING APPLICATION 905-08 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD/I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: September 17, 2008 Staff Contact: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planning Director STAFF UPDATE FOR 09/24/08 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The Planning Commission recommended approval of this request at their September 17, 2008 meeting. The recommendation of the Conunission included consideration of two items as changes to the Proffer Statement; amending the language of the trail and landscaping easement that runs along the Route 11 frontage of the property to include an allowance for grading and drainage adjacent to Route 11 in support of future improvements to Route 11, and ensuring that $125,000.00 signalization improvement contribution in Proffer 3.4 is directed solely at the signal and intersection improvement at the future entrance at Branson Spring Road and not at internal improvements accessing this fixture entrance. The Applicant has modified the Proffer Statement to address the Planning Coirunisslon's recommendation. The latest and final proffer statement is dated September 17, 2008. The Applicant has also modified their proffer statement to provide for the future dedication of up to 100' of right-of-way for the extension of Branson Spring Road, generally from the current location of Branson Spring Road, parallel to the northern property line of the property. This potential extension of Branson Springs Road is an improvement that has been envisioned during the ongoing Route 11 north planning effort. More minor modifications to the final proffer statement have addressed the continents previously provided by Mr. Bob Mitchell, including the critical timing mechanism for the $550,000.00 monetary contribution to address the transportation impacts generated by this request. This payment will be made at the time of issuance of the first building permit on the property. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 09/24/08 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING: The B3 land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. Many of the impacts associated with this rezoning request have been mitigated by the Applicant. However, careful consideration of the transportation impacts associated with this request and the proffered monetary contribution aimed at mitigating the impacts should occur similar to the consideration provided by the Planning Conunission. It is recognized that the Applicant has increased their monetary contribution for transportation. However, transportation improvements have not been provided that would achieve a level of service C or address the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/06/08 Tabled 45 days by Commission Planning Commission: 09/17/08 Approved Board of Supervisors: 09/24/08 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 33-A-109 and 33-A-110 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) PRESENT USE: Residential and agricultural ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural PROPOSED USES: Office and Warehouse Uses 0 Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 3 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a significant measurable impact on Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers offered in the BPG Properties/I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addressed transportation concerns associated with this request. We have the following comments: 1. The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance with Branson Springs Road in the futures will have a positive impact on the overall traffic movement on Route 11. 2. These proffers provide for the necessary entrance/turn lane improvements at the initial entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of site plan review. 3. While the Department recognizes that there are traffic impact deficiencies at both the Route 11 and Rest Church Road intersection and Route 11 and Brucetown/Hopewell Road intersection, it appears the best solution is to accept a monetary contribution from the applicant. This would allow Frederick County and VDOT to make future decisions on the appropriate use of these funds. Frederick County, Deputy Director -Transportation: It appears that your updated TIA addressed my previous concerns regarding background traffic. While it continues to be my position that the ideal entrance for this site would align with Branson Spring Road, it appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your proffers. While it is generally the preference of staff that physical improvements be put in place as opposed to cash proffers, the right-of-way issues in this situation and the fact that the greatest needs are on property not controlled by your client make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case. I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in process right now that calls for the extension of Branson Spring Road across the northern portion of your client's property. I would ask that your client consider making accommodations for this future roadway. Fire Marshall: Plan approval recommended. Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept.: As long as the design has the standard fire codes. Department of Inspections: No Comment. Department of Public Works: No comments received for this application. COMMENTS of 2007 APPLICATION: 1. Refer to C. Site Suitability: The site description indicates that the area is underlain by carbonate sedimentary bedrock resulting in karst terrain. Indicate if the karst terrain contains sinkholes or potential piping channels. Also, indicate if the site is marked by numerous rock outcaps which will, most probably, require blasting to accommodate site development. 2. Refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis. The proposed trip generator surnrnary included on page 8 of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) reflects the number of trips associated with 150 employees. However, the TIA has conveniently avoided the amount of truck traffic associated with the proposed distribution center. Considering the nature of the development, evaluating the truck traffic is critical in determining the real impact on the road network. Revise the TIA accordingly and resubmit. 3. Refer to F. Site Drainage: Elaborate on the statement "low impact type stormwater management techniques". We anticipate that the stormwater runoff will be dramatically increased because of the proposed development including 739,000 square feet of warehouse space, 11,000 square feet of office space, and numerous acres of 0 0 Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 4 pavement. Therefore, we anticipate that onsite stormwater management will be required to mitigate offsite impacts. This mitigation may also require quality as well as quantity control considering the potential for the transport of hydrocarbon contaminated runoff from the parking areas. Indicate how this potential enviromnental impact will be addressed in the design phase of the subject project. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: No conunents. Sanitation Authority Department: We will provide sewer and water service to this site. Department of Parks & Recreation: The Parks and Recreation Department would recommend the proffer statement include a ten foot trail on an adequate easement which to construct the trail. The trail design should meet VDOT and ASHTO guidelines. ]Health Department: The Health Dept. has no objection under the following conditions: 1. All buildings on site are to be served by the public water and sewer system as approved by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. 2. All wells are to be abandoned according to the Private Well Regulations. 3. All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic hauler and abandoned by filling with sand or gravel. 4. Permits are to be obtained from the Health Dept. for a proposal for a motel, hotel or restaurant. 5. All designs submitted should provide for protection of the Branson Spring from any contaminants or drainage due to the proposed future construction. Winchester Regional Airport: We have reviewed the proposed rezoning application and determined that the proposed development plan will not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. While the proposed site lies within the airport's airspace, it does fall outside of the airport's Part 77 close in surfaces; therefore, special conditional will not be requested. Frederick County Public Schools: We offer no continents. Historic Resources Advisory Boai•d: The HRAB considered this rezoning proposal during their meeting of January 16, 2007. The HRAB reviewed information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by the applicant. At that time, the HRAB felt that the proffers associated with historic preservation and recognition was adequate, but made two reconunendations which included: 1. Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a preliminary Information Form (PIP) from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, which is located on the property proposed to be rezoned. The PIF will determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can receive state recognition for its historical value. 2. The HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the property, so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson Iouse (across Route 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 square foot industrial structure. Attorney Comments: Please see attached comments dated July 18, 2008 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/1-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 5 Planning & ZoninjZ: 1) Site History The original Frederick County zoning map (U.S.G.S. Inwood Quadrangle) identifies the subject parcels as being zoned A-2 (Agricultural General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were subsequently combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. The Applicant previously attempted to rezone these properties in 2007. Rezoning Application RZ#07-07 was denied by the Board of Supervisors on September 12, 2007. For the purposes of this current application, the request for a different zoning classification, B3 rather than M1, is substantially different from the previous request and may be processed by Frederick County pursuant to Section 165-11 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the connnunity's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comp7-ehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1 ] T.m,7d TTcn The parcel comprising this rezoning application is located within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the site is within the limits of the Northeast Land Use Plan. The plan designates the site for business use. The commercial / industrial transition land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. The plan states that "Business and commercial land uses are proposed along the Martinsburg Pike corridor, on the east and west side of Interstate 81 exits 317, 321 and 323. It is envisioned that commercial uses which cater to the interstate traveler will be developed along the three Interstate 81 interchanges, while retail, service and office land uses will occur along the Martinsburg Pike corridor". Transportation Plans for new development should provide for the right-of-ways necessary to implement planned road improvements and new roads shown on the road plan should be constricted by the developer when warranted by the scale, intensity, or impacts of the development. Existing roads should be improved as necessary by adjacent development to implement the intentions of the plan (Comprehensive Plan 7-6). 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 6 The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan does include this portion of the County. The Northeast Land Use Plan calls for Martinsburg Pike to be improved to a four -lane facility. The Plan also states that proposed industrial and connrnercial development should only occur if impacted roads function at Level of Service (LOS) Category C or better. This application does not provide that Level of Service. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Route 11 as a short-term designated route. Site Access and design. The Northeast Land Use Plan discourages individual lot access on the Martinsburg Pike corridor, encourages inter -parcel connections, and recommends adequate screening from adjoining land uses and recommends greater setbacks and buffers and screening along Martinsburg Pike. This development has proffered commercial entrance limitations on Martinsburg Pike from the property. The project has also proposed interparcel connectivity with the adjacent parcels to the north. It may be anticipated that additional development opportunities on the adjacent properties may occur in the future. Pedestrian accommodations have been provided along the projects frontage with Route 11. 3) Site Suitability/Environment The site does not contain any environmental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. There are no identified areas of steep slopes, floodplains or woodlands. This area is also known for karst topography. The Frederick County Engineer has identified that a detailed geotechnical analysis will be needed as part of the detailed site plan design. The HRAB made two recommendations based upon the presence of the Nathaniel Branson House on the property. The HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a Preliminary Information Form (PIF) from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, and the HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the property, so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Route 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 square foot industrial structure. The application provides for additional landscape screening along Route 11 in an effort to tailor corridor improvements, beyond those customarily required by ordinance, to effectively enhance the corridor appearance of Route 11 and address the comments offered by the HRAB. 4) Potential Impacts Proposed Uses: The applicant has proffered that the property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses. It should be further guaranteed that additional land uses that may make up this square footage should be limited, such as the limitation that the applicant placed on office uses, to ensure the impacts can be appropriately measured. A. Transportation Traffic Impact Anal The traffic impact analysis (TIA) prepared for this application was amended from the TIA that 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 7 was prepared for the original rezoning request. The structure of the TIA is now acceptable to the County and VDOT as it is consistent with acceptable practices. The TIA still shows impacts at the evaluated intersections that have not been, or cannot be, addressed by the applicant. As you may recall, the TIA previously evaluated two scenarios. The amended TIA models the proffered land use scenario. The TIA indicates that Level of Service C conditions or better will be maintained on study roads and intersections with the completion of several area improvements including improvements at the intersection of Route 11/Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road and improvements at the intersection of Route 11/Rest Church Road. None of the above improvements identified in the TIA have been addressed by this application. The applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT. Transportation Program. The applicant's transportation program is limited to providing for the required access to the site via deceleration lanes and providing for a monetary contribution towards area transportation improvements that would be completed by others in the amount of $350,000. The applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT. As was the case previously, the necessary improvements identified in the TIA have not been addressed by this application. In addition, the Applicant's transportation program does not provide for or advance the County's Eastern Road Plan element of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular, the widening of Route 11. As previously noted, interparcel connectivity should be a consideration with this application. Particular attention has been paid to the property to the north of this project. The extension of Branson Springs Road to the west through this site and over Interstate 81 is a concept that has recently been discussed and should continue to be evaluated with this project and as The Northeastern Frederick Land Use Plan is being reevaluated. Additional comments from Mr. John Bishop, Frederick County Transportation Plarmer are summarized as follows. 1. Applicant should be preparing their site to make for an easy transition to an entrance area that aligns with Branson Springs Rd. 2. Access should be granted to the entrance mentioned in the bullet above for the property to the north. 3. Right -away should be considered for an extension of Branson Springs along the northern portion of the property. 4. Cash proffer amount is improved. Rezoning 404-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 8 C. Design Standards The Northeast Land Use Plan recommends adequate screening from adjoining land uses and recommends greater setbacks and buffers and screening along Martinsburg Pike. The site is surrounded on all sides by RA (Rural Areas) zoned property, which is either in agricultural or residential use. While it is possible that these uses may change in the future, in line with the Northeast Land Use Plan, for the moment, screening should be addressed. The project's location on a major corridor warrants particular attention. This has been provided for in this latest version of the application. Some additional clarification to allow for an improved landscaped area should be worked into the application. Consideration should also be given to screening along Interstate 81. The applicant has discussed addressing this issue and should incorporate this into the proffer statement. D. Community Facilities The development of this site will have an impact on community facilities and services. However, it is recognized that connnercial uses generally provide a positive impact on community facilities through the additional generation of tax revenue. This application addresses the impacts to Fire and Rescue services by providing a monetary contribution in an amount of $10,000. Proffer Statement— Dated June 19, 2008. Updated through September 17, 2008 (Please see updates provided to PC and BOS for a review of the changes to the proffers). A) Generalized Development Plan A Generalized Development Plan has been provided by the applicant. Staff would suggest that the flexibility written into the paragraph introducing the GDP may be too flexible and should be addressed. B) Land Use The applicant has provided that the amount of office space on the property will be incorporated into the primary use structure. Further, the applicant has proffered the development of no more than 750,000 square feet. It would be advisable to further guarantee the development of the site will be for one building only, consistent with the GDP. The applicant has proffered out specific land uses. The Applicant has proffered a ten foot wide landscape strip along Route I 1 including a variety of landscape plantings. This proffer should be expanded to allow for a broader area of planting in the area set aside between the right-of-way and the parking setback. The applicant has proffered to employ the M 1 district setback and yard requirements for the development of this site. 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 9 The applicant has limited the facade materials of the buildings fronting along Route 11 and Interstate 81 to a variety of materials. Proffer 7 is redundant as they are required by current ordinance. C) Transportation The Applicant's proffered transportation improvements include the dedication of an additional ten feet of right-of-way for fixture improvements to Route 11 to be done by others. Right turn deceleration lanes have been proffered. The proffered right turn lanes are the minimum that would be required by VDOT during the development of the site. The Applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT and has proffered a $350,000 monetary contribution at the time of Certificate of Occupancy for unspecified improvements within the Route 11 corridor. Such improvements would be done by others. The Applicant has proffered to construct a ten foot wide asphalt multi -use trail along their frontage on Route 11. In general, the transportation proffer is much simplified from that previously offered The mechanism for obtaining the transportation proffer is improved and the dollar value of the proffer is more than before. However, it should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the amount is sufficient to address and mitigate the transportation impacts associated with this request. An update to the County's Development Impact Model is presently being prepared This will be a very important tool to evaluate what may be the appropriate transportation contribution for development projects. D) Community Facilities The Applicant has proffered $10,000 to Frederick County for use by Clearbrook Volunteer Fire and Rescue. CONCLUSIONS FOR 08/06/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The B3 land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. Many of the impacts associated with this rezoning request have been mitigated by the Applicant. However, carefiil consideration of the transportation impacts associated with this request and the proffered monetary contribution aimed at mitigating the impacts should occur. Transportation improvements have not been provided that would achieve a level of service C or address the Comprehensive Plan. 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 10 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 08/06/08 MEETING: The applicant's team provided their cost estimates for transportation improvements based on the impact of background traffic versus the percentage of impact generated from their project. They calculated their share for background transportation infrastructure improvements to be $350,000 which would cover traffic signalization, a share in the construction of the Hopewell/Brucetown intersection, and the left -turn lane at Rest Church Road. The applicant's team pointed out revisions to their proffer which included a maximum of 750,000 square -feet of permitted use located within one building or within multiple buildings; one entrance to the property with availability for access by adjoining property and inter -parcel connections; the removal of food stores and hardware stores as allowable uses; utilization of M1 side yards and setbacks; erdianced landscaping; modifications to trip numbers from background traffic with growth rates; and the use of ITE trip generation numbers for traffic modeling. A property owner in the Stonewall District, Mr. George Sempeles, spoke during the public comment portion of the hearing; he was in favor of growth and development along Route 11 North. He believed this area needed business growth in order to fund the road improvements needed at the Brucetown interchange and the Route 11/Rest Church entrance. Regarding the issues involving truck traffic, he commented that the new FBI Records Management site will not generate truck traffic, thereby reducing the amount of background traffic. Furthermore, he pointed out an additional 12-foot right-of-way reserved along his side of the road for a left -turn lane within the corridor between Clearbrook and Rest Church, which could be used to accommodate traffic. Connnissioners raised issues involving the inadequacy of transportation infrastructure in this area and their concerns about the impact of additional truck -traffic from the proposed use in addition to existing background traffic. They questioned whether the applicant's monetary contribution towards transportation infrastructure was sufficient and whether the traffic impacts from the proposed use were adequately addressed. The lack of sufficient right-of-way at this location to fix the infrastructure geometrically or structurally was discussed and the possibility of a traffic management plan was raised. A member of the Cornnrission commented about a few of the successful rezoning projects in this area and a couple of things those projects had in common were the installation of a split -rail fence along the corridor and each of the projects not only agreed to dedicate the ten -foot right-of-way along Route 11, but to build their section of the 12-foot lane across the entire frontage. It was noted that the Comprehensive Policy Plan calls for Route 11 to be a four -lane divided highway. It was suggested that this project's applicants should consider following suit with these provisions. Conunission members agreed with the need to eliminate hardware stores and food stores as an allowed use. The Commissioners pointed out that their Bylaws state that if revised proffers are not received prior to the agenda mailing, the Commission should table the application in order to provide time for the public to review the new proffers. The Plamzing Commission voted unanimously to table the rezoning application for 45 days in order to provide the public with the opportunity to review the revised proffers that were submitted after the agenda mailing and to give the applicant the opportunity to refine the application based on the issues raised. 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 11 (Note: Commissioner Watt was absent for this vote; Commissioners Ruclunan, Triplett, and Kerr were absent from the meeting.) STAFF UPDATE FOR 09/17/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Applicant previously provided the Planning Commission with a revised proffer statement prior to your 08/06/08 meeting. In this revision, the Applicant attempted to address those issues identified in the staff report and those items identified by Mr. Bob Mitchell during his legal review dated July 18, 2008. Following this Commission meeting, the Applicant further revised their proffer statement in an effort to address the issues identified by the Planning Commission. The date of this latest revision to the proffer statement is August 25, 2008. In summary, the changes to the substance of the proffer statement are as follows. The Applicant has proffered out additional land uses including Food Stores or groceries and Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries. It was previously recognized that such uses could generate higher vehicle trip counts than originally anticipated by this request. Changes to the Applicants transportation program include a commitment to no more than one entrance to the property. However, provisions have been made for the closure of this entrance in favor of a future entrance aligned with Branson Springs Road which is to be constructed by others. A contribution up to 50 percent of the cost of this entrance and signalization, up to an amount not to exceed $125,000.00 has been made. Proffers 3.3 and 3.4 regarding the potential for this relocated entrance to the property appear to warrant additional attention due to the specific language and a concern that the cap of $125,000.00 may not ultimately achieve a 50 percent share of the ultimate cost of the project. The Applicant has increased their monetary contribution by $200,000.00, to $550,000.00 from $350,000.00, for transportation improvements in the Route 11 north corridor. The County Attorney's concern regarding the timing of this contribution at issuance of building permit rather than at the time of a Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the property remains valid. The Applicant has proffered to provide additional tree plantings along the properties frontage with Interstate 81 and has also proposed the construction of a split rail fence along the properties Route 11 frontage. In general, the more detailed comments previously offered by Mr. Mitchell appear to remain unaddressed. Any additional comments provided by the County Attorney will be forwarded to the Commission. Rezoning 404-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 17, 2008 Page 12 STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 09/17/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff's conclusions for this meeting remain generally the same as our previous conclusion. The B3 land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. Many of the impacts associated with this rezoning request have been mitigated by the Applicant. However, careful consideration of the transportation impacts associated with this request and the proffered monetary contribution aimed at mitigating the impacts should occur. It is recognized that the Applicant has increased their monetary contribution for transportation. However, transportation improvements have not been provided that would achieve a level of service C or address the Comprehensive Plan. The Planuiu_Q Commission held a public (rearing for this request at your 08106108 meetin,�. Followink the public meeting, a recommendation by the Planning- Commission to the Board of Supervisors concerning this rezonin,a application would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Plannink Commission. 0 0 REZONING APPLICATION #05-08 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD/I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER Staff Report for the Board of Supervisors Prepared: September 2, 2008 Staff Contact: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planning Director STAFF UPDATE FOR 09/17/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The Applicant previously provided the Planning Commission with a revised proffer statement prior to your 08/06/08 meeting. In this revision, the Applicant attempted to address those issues identified in the staff report and those items identified by Mr. Bob Mitchell during his legal review dated July 18, 2008. Following this Commission meeting, the Applicant further revised their proffer statement in an effort to address the issues identified by the Planning Commission. The date of this latest revision to the proffer statement is August 25, 2008. In summary, the changes to the substance of the proffer statement are as follows. The Applicant has proffered out additional land uses including Food Stores or groceries and Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries. It was previously recognized that such uses could generate higher vehicle trip counts than originally anticipated by this request. Changes to the Applicant's transportation program include a commitment to no more than one entrance to the property. However, provisions have been made for the closure of this entrance in favor of a future entrance aligned with Branson Springs Road which is to be constructed by others. A contribution up to 50 percent of the cost of this entrance and signalization, up to an amount not to exceed $125,000.00 has been made. Proffers 3.3 and 3.4 regarding the potential for this relocated entrance to the property appear to warrant additional attention due to the specific language and a concern that the cap of $125,000.00 may not ultimately achieve a 50 percent share of the ultimate cost of the project. The Applicant has increased their monetary contribution by $200,000.00, to $550,000.00 from $350,000.00, for transportation improvements in the Route 11 north corridor. The County Attorney's concern regarding the timing of this contribution at issuance of building permit rather than at the time of a Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the property remains valid. The Applicant has proffered to provide additional tree plantings along the properties frontage with Interstate 81 and has also proposed the construction of a split rail fence along the properties' Route 11 frontage. In general, the more detailed comments previously offered by Mr. Mitchell appear to remain unaddressed. Any additional comments provided by the County Attorney will be forwarded to the Commission. 9 0 Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 2 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/06/08 Tabled 45 days by Commission Planning Commission: 09/17/08 Pending Board of Supervisors: 09/24/08 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 33-A-109 and 33-A-110 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) PRESENT USE: Residential and agricultural ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural PROPOSED USES: Office and Warehouse Uses 0 0 Rezoning 904-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 3 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a significant measurable impact on Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers offered in the BPG Properties/I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addressed transportation concerns associated with this request. We have the following continents: 1. The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance with Branson Springs Road in the futures will have a positive impact on the overall traffic movement on Route 11. 2. These proffers provide for the necessary entrance/turn lane improvements at the initial entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of site plan review. 3. While the Department recognizes that there are traffic impact deficiencies at both the Route 11 and Rest Church Road intersection and Route 11 and Brucetown/Hopewell Road intersection, it appears the best solution is to accept a monetary contribution from the applicant. This would allow Frederick County and VDOT to make fixture decisions on the appropriate use of these funds. Frederick County, Deputy Director -Transportation: It appears that your updated TIA addressed my previous concerns regarding background traffic. While it continues to be my position that the ideal entrance for this site would align with Branson Spring Road, it appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your proffers. While it is generally the preference of staff that physical improvements be put in place as opposed to cash proffers, the right-of-way issues in this situation and the fact that the greatest needs are on property not controlled by your client make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case. I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in process right now that calls for the extension of Branson Spring Road across the northern portion of your client's property. I would ask that your client consider making accommodations for this future roadway. Fire Marshall: Plan approval reconunended. Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept.: As long as the design has the standard fire codes. Department of Inspections: No Comment. Department of Public Works: No comments received for this application. COMMENTS of 2007 APPLICATION: 1. Refer to C. Site Suitability: The site description indicates that the area is underlain by carbonate sedimentary bedrock resulting in karst terrain. Indicate if the karst terrain contains sinkholes or potential piping channels. Also, indicate if the site is marked by numerous rock outcaps which will, most probably, require blasting to accommodate site development. 2. Refer to the Traffic Impact Analysis. The proposed trip generator summary included on page 8 of the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) reflects the number of trips associated with 150 employees. However, the TIA has conveniently avoided the amount of truck traffic associated with the proposed distribution center. Considering the nature of the development, evaluating the truck traffic is critical in determining the real impact on the road network. Revise the TIA accordingly and resubmit. 3. Refer to F. Site Drainage: Elaborate on the statement "low impact type stormwater management techniques". We anticipate that the stormwater runoff will be dramatically increased because of the proposed development including 739,000 square feet of warehouse space, 11,000 square feet of office space, and numerous acres of 0 0 Rezoning 904-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 4 pavement. Therefore, we anticipate that onsite stormwater management will be required to mitigate offsite impacts. This mitigation may also require quality as well as quantity control considering the potential for the transport of hydrocarbon contaminated runoff from the parking areas. Indicate how this potential enviromnental impact will be addressed in the design phase of the subject project. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: No comments. Sanitation Authority Department: We will provide sewer and water service to this site. Department of Parks & Recreation: The Parks and Recreation Department would recommend the proffer statement include a ten foot trail on an adequate easement which to construct the trail. The trail design should meet VDOT and ASHTO guidelines. Health Department: The Health Dept. has no objection under the following conditions: 1. All buildings on site are to be served by the public water and sewer system as approved by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. 2. All wells are to be abandoned according to the Private Well Regulations. 3. All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic hauler and abandoned by filling with sand or gravel. 4. Permits are to be obtained from the Health Dept. for a proposal for a motel, hotel or restaurant. 5. All designs submitted should provide for protection of the Branson Spring from any contaminants or drainage due to the proposed future construction. Winchester Regional Airport: We have reviewed the proposed rezoning application and determined that the proposed development plan will not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. While the proposed site lies within the airport's airspace, it does fall outside of the airport's Part 77 close in surfaces; therefore, special conditional will not be requested. Frederick County Public Schools: We offer no connnents. Historic Resources Advisory Board: The HRAB considered this rezoning proposal during their meeting of January 16, 2007. The HRAB reviewed information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by the applicant. At that time, the HRAB felt that the proffers associated with historic preservation and recognition was adequate, but made two recommendations which included: 1. Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a preliminary Information Form (PIF) from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, which is located on the property proposed .to be rezoned. The PIF will determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can receive state recognition for its historical value. 2. The HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the property, so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Route 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 square foot industrial structure. Attorney Comments: Please see attached connnents dated July 18, 2008 0 0 Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 5 Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History The original Frederick County zoning map (U.S.G.S. Inwood Quadrangle) identifies the subject parcels as being zoned A-2 (Agricultural General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were subsequently combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. The Applicant previously attempted to rezone these properties in 2007. Rezoning Application RZ#07-07 was denied by the Board of Supervisors on September 12, 2007. For the purposes of this current application, the request for a different zoning classification, B3 rather than M1, is substantially different from the previous request and may be processed by Frederick County pursuant to Section 165-11 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. I-]] Land Use The parcel comprising this rezoning application is located within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the site is within the limits of the Northeast Land Use Plan. The plan designates the site for business use. The commercial / industrial transition land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. The plan states that "Business and commercial land uses are proposed along the Martinsburg Pike corridor, on the east and west side of Interstate 81 exits 317, 321 and 323. It is envisioned that commercial uses which cater to the interstate traveler will be developed along the three Interstate 81 interchanges, while retail, service and office land uses will, occ..ur..along the Martinsburg Pike corridor". Transportation Plans for new development should provide for the right-of-ways necessary to implement planned road improvements and new roads shown on the road plan should be constructed by the developer when warranted by the scale, intensity, or impacts of the development. Existing roads should be improved as necessary by adjacent development to implement the intentions of the plan (Comprehensive Plan 7-6). Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 6 The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan does include this portion of the County. The Northeast Land Use Plan calls for Martinsburg Pike to be improved to a four -lane facility. The Plan also states that proposed industrial and cormnercial development should only occur if impacted roads function at Level of Service (LOS) Category C or better. This application does not provide that Level of Service. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Route 11 as a short-term designated route. Site Access and design. The Northeast Land Use Plan discourages individual lot access on the Martinsburg Pike corridor, encourages inter -parcel connections, and reconunends adequate screening from adjoining land uses and recommends greater setbacks and buffers and screening along Martinsburg Pike. This development has proffered commercial entrance limitations on Martinsburg Pike from the property. The project has also proposed interparcel connectivity with the adjacent parcels to the north. It may be anticipated that additional development opportunities on the adjacent properties may occur in the future. Pedestrian acconunodations have been provided along the projects frontage with Route 11. 3) Site Suitability/Environment The site does not contain any enviromnental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. There are no identified areas of steep slopes, floodplains or woodlands. This area is also known for karst topography. The Frederick County Engineer has identified that a detailed geotechnical analysis will be needed as part of the detailed site plan design. The HRAB made two recommendations based upon the presence of the Nathaniel Branson House on the property. The HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a Preliminary Information Forin (PIF) from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, and the HRAB requested that a landscaped bean be placed along the frontage of the property, so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Route 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 square foot industrial structure. The application provides for additional landscape screening along Route 11 in an effort to tailor corridor improvements, beyond those customarily required by ordinance, to effectively enhance the corridor appearance of Route 11 and address the continents offered by the HRAB. 4) Potential Impacts Proposed Uses: The applicant has -proffered that the property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses. It should be further guaranteed that additional land uses that may make up this square footage should be limited, such as the limitation that the applicant placed on office uses, to ensure the impacts can be appropriately measured. A. Transportation Traffic Impact Analysis. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) prepared for this application was amended from the TIA that Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 7 was prepared for the original rezoning request. The structure of the TIA is now acceptable to the County and VDOT as it is consistent with acceptable practices. The TIA still shows impacts at the evaluated intersections that have not been, or camlot be, addressed by the applicant. As you may recall, the TIA previously evaluated two scenarios. The amended TIA models the proffered land use scenario. The TIA indicates that Level of Service C conditions or better will be maintained on study roads and intersections with the completion of several area improvements including improvements at the intersection of Route 11 /Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road and improvements at the intersection of Route 11/Rest Church Road. None of the above improvements identified in the TIA have been addressed by this application. The applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT. Transportation Program. The applicant's transportation program is limited to providing for the required access to the site via deceleration lanes and providing for a monetary contribution towards area transportation improvements that would be completed by others in the amount of $350,000. The applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT. As was the case previously, the necessary improvements identified in the TIA have not been addressed by this application. In addition, the Applicant's transportation program does not provide for or advance the County's Eastern Road Plan element of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular, the widening of Route 11. As previously noted, inteiparcel connectivity should be a consideration with this application. Particular attention has been paid to the property to the north of this project. The extension of Branson Springs Road to the west through this site and over Interstate 81 is a concept that has recently been discussed and should continue to be evaluated with this project and as The Northeastern Frederick Land Use Plan is being reevaluated. Additional comments from Mr. John Bishop, Frederick County Transportation Planner are summarized as follows. 1. Applicant should be preparing their site to make for an easy transition to an entrance area that aligns with Branson Springs Rd. 2. Access should be,granted to the entrance mentioned in the bullet above for the ^property to the north. 3. Right -away should be considered for an extension of Branson Springs along the northern portion of the property. 4. Cash proffer amount is improved. Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 8 C. Design Standards The Northeast Land Use Plan recommends adequate screening from adjoining land uses and recommends greater setbacks and buffers and screening along Martinsburg Pike. The site is surrounded on all sides by RA (Rural Areas) zoned property, which is either in agricultural or residential use. While it is possible that these uses may change in the future, in line with the Northeast Land Use Plan, for the moment, screening should be addressed. The project's location on a major corridor warrants particular attention. This has been provided for in this latest version of the application. Some additional clarification to allow for an improved landscaped area should be worked into the application. Consideration should also be given to screening along Interstate 81. The applicant has discussed addressing this issue and should incorporate this into the proffer statement. D. Community Facilities The development of this site will have an impact on community facilities and services. However, it is recognized that commercial uses generally provide a positive impact on community facilities through the additional generation of tax revenue. This application addresses the impacts to Fire and Rescue services by providing a monetary contribution in an amount of $10,000. Proffer Statement — Dated June 19, 2008. A) Generalized Development Plan A Generalized Development Plan has been provided by the applicant. Staff would suggest that the flexibility written into the paragraph introducing the GDP may be too flexible and should be addressed. B) Land Use The applicant has provided that the amount of office space on the property will be incorporated into the primary use structure. Further, the applicant has proffered the development of no more than 750,000 square feet. It would be advisable to further guarantee the development of the site will be for one building only, consistent with the GDP. The applicant has proffered out specific land uses. The Applicant has proffered a ten foot wide landscape strip along Route 11 including a variety of landscape plantings. This proffer should be expanded to allow for a broader area of planting in the area set aside between the right-of-way and the parking setback. The applicant has proffered to employ the M1 district setback and yard requirements for the development of this site. Rezoning 904-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 9 The applicant has limited the facade materials of the buildings fronting along Route 11 and Interstate 81 to a variety of materials. Proffer 7 is redundant as they are required by current ordinance. C) Transportation The Applicant's proffered transportation improvements include the dedication of an additional ten feet of right-of-way for future improvements to Route 11 to be done by others. Right turn deceleration lanes have been proffered. The proffered right turn lanes are the minimum that would be required by VDOT during the development of the site. The Applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT and has proffered a $350,000 monetary contribution at the time of Certificate of Occupancy for unspecified improvements within the Route 11 corridor. Such improvements would be done by others. The Applicant has proffered to construct a ten foot wide asphalt multi -use trail along their frontage on Route 11. In general, the transportation proffer is much simplified from that previously offered. The mechanism for obtaining the transportation proffer is improved and the dollar value of the proffer is more than before. However, it should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the amount is sufficient to address and mitigate the transportation impacts associated with this request. An update to the County's Development Impact Model is presently being prepared. This will be a very important tool to evaluate what may be the appropriate transportation contribution for development projects. D) Community Facilities The Applicant has proffered $10,000 to Frederick County for use by Clearbrook Volunteer Fire and Rescue. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 08/06/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The B3 land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. Many of the impacts associated with this rezoning request have been mitigated by the Applicant. However, careful consideration of the transportation impacts associated with this request and the proffered monetary contribution aimed at mitigating the impacts should occur. Transportation improvements have not been provided that would achieve a level of service C or address the Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 10 PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 08/06/08 MEETING: The applicant's team provided their cost estimates for transportation improvements based on the impact of background traffic versus the percentage of impact generated from their project. They calculated their share for background transportation infrastructure improvements to be $350,000 which would cover traffic signalization, a share in the construction of the Hopewell/Brucetown intersection, and the left -turn lane at Rest Church Road. The applicant's team pointed out revisions to their proffer which included a maximum of 750,000 square -feet of permitted use located within one building or within multiple buildings; one entrance to the property with availability for access by adjoining property and inter -parcel comlections; the removal of food stores and hardware stores as allowable uses; utilization of MI side yards and setbacks; enhanced landscaping; modifications to trip numbers from background traffic with growth rates; and the use of ITE trip generation numbers for traffic modeling. A property owner in the Stonewall District, Mr. George Sempeles, spoke during the public comment portion of the hearing; he was in favor of growth and development along Route 11 North. He believed this area needed business growth in order to fund the road improvements needed at the Brucetown interchange and the Route 11/Rest Church entrance. Regarding the issues involving truck traffic, he commented that the new FBI Records Management site will not generate truck traffic, thereby reducing the amount of background traffic. Furthermore, he pointed out an additional 12-foot right-of-way reserved along his side of the road for a left -turn lane within the corridor between Clearbrook and Rest Church, which could be used to acconnnodate traffic. Commissioners raised issues involving the inadequacy of transportation infrastructure in this area and their concerns about the impact of additional truck -traffic from the proposed use in addition to existing background traffic. They questioned whether the applicant's monetary contribution towards transportation infrastructure was sufficient and whether the traffic impacts from the proposed use were adequately addressed. The lack of sufficient right-of-way at this location to fix the infrastructure geometrically or structurally was discussed and the possibility of a traffic management plan was raised. A member of the Commission commented about a few of the successful rezoning projects in this area and a couple of things those projects had in common were the installation of a split -rail fence along the corridor and each of the projects not only agreed to dedicate the ten -foot right-of-way along Route 11, but to build their section of the 12-foot lane across the entire frontage. It was noted that the Comprehensive Policy Plan calls for Route 11 to be a four -lane divided highway. It was suggested that this project's applicants should consider following suit with these provisions. Commission members agreed with the need to eliminate hardware stores and food stores as an allowed use. The Commissioners pointed out that their Bylaws state that if revised proffers are not received prior to the agenda mailing, the Commission should table the application in order to provide time for the public to review the new proffers. The Planning Commission voted unanimously to table the rezoning application for 45 days in order to provide the public with the opportunity to review the revised proffers that were submitted after the agenda mailing and to give the applicant the opportunity to refine the application based on the issues raised. Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center September 2, 2008 Page 11 (Note: Commissioner Watt was absent for this vote; Commissioners Ruckman, Triplett, and Kerr were absent from the meeting.) STAFF UPDATE FOR 09/17/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Please see front page of this report. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 09/17/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff s conclusions for this meeting remain generally the same as our previous conclusion. The B3 land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. Many of the impacts associated with this rezoning request have been mitigated by the Applicant. However, careful consideration of the transportation impacts associated with this request and the proffered monetary contribution aimed at mitigating the impacts should occur. It is recognized that the Applicant has increased their monetary contribution for transportation. However, transportation improvements have not been provided that would achieve a level of service C or address the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this request at hour 08106108 meeting. Following the public meeting, a recommendation by the Planning Commission to the Board of Supervisors concerning this rezoning application fvould be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequatelV address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. I-81 Distribution Center ReZoning l REZ 05 - 08 PIN: 33 - A - 109, 33 - A - 110 41 o. ; ' •� �� � sit r• � ems" Case Planner: Mike Future Rt37 Bypass Zoning _ M2 (Industrial. General Disinct) Application — BI (Busmess. Neighborhood District) - MHI (Mobile Home Communnr Disinct) - Urban D—lopnsm Area • B2 (Business. General Diarist) • MS (Medical Support Detnco S WSA - B3 (Business. Industrial Transition District) — RI (Residential Planned Commumq District) • EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) - R5 (Residential Recreational Communn) Dtstrict) - HE (Higher Education District) 1 RA (Rural Area District) • M I(Indusmal. Light Dlslnct) RP (Residential Performance District) 0 250 500 1,000 Feet A. Site Background and Histoiy The I-81 Distribution Center property consists of 2 parcels with PIN Ws 33-((A))-109 & 33-((A))-110. The 59.077 acres of land are located as shown on the attached Figure 1 Location Map. The site lies outside the Urban Development Area of Frederick County. (See Figure 2). The site had historically been used for agriculture. Principle access is provided by U. S. Route 11 "Martinsburg Pike". 'A I a\n 61 It In 1 R� i �/' ■ it h f 7 1 CJ +� ¢ P • a -- i {' n ■ tic 4 Lj Zl- hh 7 '+ A Y � L ■ Y T I 1 ' O f • � � r 4- Inv" IDISTRIBUTION CENTER F-81 IS COUNTY, CENTER EDse IA TAS Drawn by Datei10/24/06 Job No.07-06-0072 Ptn Nui+lxn tom' WINCI£STOt, VIRGUIIA FIGURE ) LOCATION MAP Check a by OCATIONMAP.DWG Scale, N/A B Location and Access The sites has 2077' frontage on U. S. Route 11 "Martinsburg Pike" which will be the principle access to the development parcel. Figure 3 shows the location of the site with respect to area transportation planning. The site will utilize U. S. Route 11 for this rezoned use. There will be one (1) access point for the site as depicted on the GDP and as reflected in the Proffer Statement. The "Initial Entrance" will be 700' south of Branson Spring Road and the "Future Entrance" will be aligned with Branson Spring. Since the site is located within the I-81 corridor and is situated between exits 321 and 323, traffic to and from the site will be provided with options. Refer to Traffic Impact Analysis by PHR&A for existing and anticipated traffic movements. 739 �4 i' 67s � tk '�� FUNDS TO BE PROVIDED BY • _ WINCHESTERg' MEDICAL % • Ua CENTER r•9 SITE 4- 66 RECONFIGURE 6 CONNECTION (� 664 fna[n 90 area Winchester MIn 659�, ` J r (= 1 1 REMOVE ROAD u:l{ U3A J^ 1 622 1 y/ I• i., l ,1 6� 6r6 726 644 Frederick REMOVE ro iy! , t INTERCHANGE f 7 County IJ: WA Y I v Sie hens u4 ! 617 —642 L::-ID /'` f T'YF i.:i SFDPCN L()11� `♦ � � ,�`��� 636, `\ H:p �ul„JrnnTEe eEloLv' / j �ry �� SZUDY MEA tlU11:�WY iNRrgR Jr14u'I!OYR'f•rS TU FCAOIYn•' p[ •� - E<Efirtsl a crut N, 1C Y - —m tM.A1MVAY JN ww ni ,yrl.lEM Iv ` F/.Lt�ffY flE[IOrcD nR(M.Y u(;IIFIlO 0<7 � I MTI[%:GNFARE SY$TEH FUnDW.1 LDNrEL tT:>: Ltf,.tirtJ j vEn WI EI tLI'A�f Y Diwsnva nsrwi�m :M mN� \ \ � YI'[ RLHAnGE YFgpYE1.1EN,6 TYPICALSECTIONS Z L14 - 11'{ q Ubt C is I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER Dnte110/24/06 Job No.107-06-0072 rat. `� FREDERICK COU m, VIRGINIA rn Y wFdw - TMD Dwcowrj, w- WINCHESTER AREA hA Cadd file no.l Figure ERn vacHm vw-wm TRANSPORTATION STUDY Y ATTSSTIJDYEIOGDiT4 SCaIel N/A C. Site Suitability The project and general geographic area is underlain by carbonate sedimentary bedrock which results in karst terrain. Topographic mapping for the site indicates a site typical of the karst terrain with gentle slopes and reasonable level plain areas. Typical of other properties within the area, this site is generally suitable for the proposed facility. A site characterization showing important environmental features is included in Figure 4. The following chart provides an area summary: I-81 Distribution Center Site Characteristics Total Project Area 59.077 Acres Area in Flood Plain 0.00 Acres Area in Woodlands 0.00 Acres Area in Steep Slopes 0.00 Acres Area in Wetlands 0.00 Acres Lakes & Ponds 0.00 Acres The property is planned for a warehouse facility with an approximate building area of 750,000 square feet and parking for 100 +/- cars, 200 trailers, and 150 loading docks. 1$1TE *t : F - i L a EXISTING 1= VEGETATION` a - ti ,. 86A j, �► c7r ';a i f a. Y r ' EXISTING BUILDING 44 �. 67 a r A `. r, ^t 133 •.r+ 129 / 131 Y. .. r I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER TAS FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Drawn by Datet10/24/06 Job No,07-06-0072 Pelt+ Nu lwr, TRIAD ENG[lEERING, INC. DOH Cadd file no., NINCHESTER, VIRGINIA SITE CHARACTERISTICS Checked by STTECHARACT,DVG Scaler=N/A FIGURE D. Traffic The transportation impact analysis prepared for this project shows that under the conditions provided, traffic generation from this site is acceptable and manageable considering the overall development of the U. S. Route 11/I-81 corridor. Under the conditions imposed by this rezoning, this roadway system will continue to function at a level of service of "C" or better during the 2010 background and build -out conditions, respectively. As is stated in the Traffic Impact Analysis, the development of this site to accommodate a 750,000 +/- square foot warehouse facility does not significantly affect the existing or proposed roadway system. REZONING A.PP.LICAI`ION FORM FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA be completed by Planning Staff Fee. Amount Paid $ ling Amendment Num er Date.Rec iI 'd Hearing Date �' (D v BOS. Hearing Date The following information shall be provided..by the applicant: All parcel identification numbers, deed book. and -page numbers may be -obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division,107 North Kent Street, Winchester. 1. Applicant: Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Address: c/o Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh, PC 4310 Prince William Parkway Ste 300, Prince William, VA 22192 2. Property Owner (if different than above) Name: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. Telephone: (540) 550-5027 Address: PO Box 67 Clearbrook,VA 22624 3. Contact person if other 1han -above Name: Michael J. Coughlin Telephone: ; (703) 680-4664 4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application. Location map X Agency Comments X Plat X Fees X Deed to property X Impact Analysis Statement X Verification of taxes paid X Proffer Statement X 10 5. The Code of 'Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr.. BPG Properties, Ltd. 6. A) Current Use of the Property: Agricultural with existing residence B) Proposed Use of the Property: 750,000 square feet of warehouse and ancillary uses permitted by the Proffer Statement. 7. Adjoining Property: PARCEL ID NUMBER USE 33-A-86A, 86B, 87B, 111 Residential .33-A-87, 108, 112 Agricultural 33-12-24 Agricultural 33-A-105B Commercial ZONING i RA RA M-1 8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers): Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). 11 • r] 9. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning proposed : _Number of Units Proposed Single Family homes: N/A Townhome: N/A Multi -Family: N/A Non -Residential Lots: N/A Mobile Home: N/A Hotel Rooms: N/A Square Footage of Proposed Uses Office: N/A Service Station: N/A Retail: N/A Manufacturing: N/A .Restaurant! N/A 'Warehouse: 750,0.00 Other: N/A 10. Signature: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for site inspection purposes. I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be plated at the front property line at.least.seven days prior to. -the Planning -Commission public Bearing and the -Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained -so as to be visible from the road right-of-way until the hearing. I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge. Applicant(s): Dafi . L Date: Owner(s): Date: /p g Tate: 12 • Adjoining Property Owners Rezoning Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property, The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Property Identification Number Address Name David Lee pmqq P 0 BzK 174 C2Gntrrf*., VA 22624 Property # 33-1�,111 Name Charles W Cif Sr & ,b1 i m a-Epard 2897 Martinsburg Pike Clr VA 22656 Property # 33-A-112 Named S. Cline 4123 Martixsburg Pike ClEarkxrodc, VA 22624 Property # 33-A-108 Name Yay M. Bcym P 0 B:x 67 Clearbrook VA 22624 Property # 33-A 8 Name yay M. Bayo=� P 0 Bcx 67 Clearbrock VA 22624 Property # 33-A-868 Name David C. Cbok 4030 Nartirr xm Pike Cl do VA 22624 Property # 33-A 87B Name Cam E. & Ju3y S. RLrr l 2619 WDodsicb Ptad Ctear� VA 22624 Property # 33-A-87 Name F�ie]_d Finn cE FYed. Cb. ITC 2897 Martinsburg Pike Stsola-sm, VA 22656 Property # 33-12-24 Name Martinsburg Pike As=., LZC 4150 Martinsburg Pike CLearh� VA 22624 Property # 33-A-105B 14 I 600 1000 1500 SCALE: 1 "-500' IPF = IRON PIN FOUND IRS = IRON ROD SET SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CURVE TABLE. PARCEL 109 = 18.9306 AC.t PARCEL 110 = 40.1464 AC.t TOTAL AREA = 59.0770 AC.t I ()WRIER: ROBIN HULL & KAY MARIE MORRISON I;I I W1 #0a00002.35 114 3.5 ((A)) PRCLS 109 & 110 I 1 II , �'I JHVEI I IAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF IIILF DEPORT. 1HEREFORE, THIS PLAT MAY NOT INDICATE d I L FJGHMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. I I IL EXIS1 EH(l OF VEGETATED OR TIDAL WETLANDS WAS NOT I )I I ERMINED DARING THIS SURVEY. I I it LXA(. I 1 0CATION OR EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES 1101 ESTABLISHED DURING THIS SURVEY. �Lp,CH O 4o� v DAVID F. SPRIGGS No. 1853 AUGUST 14, 2006 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY AND ANY INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON IS BASED ON AN ACTUAL FIELD RUN SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND THERE ARE NO APPARENT ENCROACHMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN OR NOTED. BOUNDARY SURVEY ON THE PROPERTY OF ROBIN HULL & KAY MARIE MORRISON STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE: AUGUST 14, 2006 SCALE: 1 " = 500' CRIAD TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. 200 AVIATION DRIVE WINCHESTER, VIRGIIIA (540) 667-9300 FAX (540) 667-2260 MATCH LINE - SHEET 3 OF 3 / MANHOLE--,-,` �o FRAME BARN 2 STORY BRICK i HOUSE GRAVEL m N D/V✓ / 2 � h CoCO z PRCL 110 70 40.1464 AC.f X _o �o CO 441 h ` ) !�/ ,�FENIJCE. IRS IRS NAs,• S18'31'55"W \ / 35•� h� 142.22' POST FENCE WIRE ' REMAINS FENCE 61 484 CHAR ESF W. & FENCE DONgCD A,,-,,- .84' ' C JOI_INE S. ORNDOFF POST L S OFF IRS 577/694 ���/36�6Rgcc S67'35'13"E — 905.20`� y. TO SET STONE FND. ! SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CURVE TABLE. 200 0 200 400 61 win SCALE: 1--200' Q,L'H OF DAVID F. SPRIGGS No. 1853 sv[tv°.' AUGUST 14, 2006 BOUNDARY SURVEY ON THE PROPERTY OF ROBIN HULL & KAY MARIE MORRISON STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DATE: AUGUST 14, 2006 SCALE: 1 " = 200' CRIAD TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. 200 AVIATION DRIVE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA (540) 667-9300 FAX (540) 667-2260 C1 07'03'33" 1701.03 15690.00 1350.96 1 S13'38'12"W 1700.59 / 41PF N28'12'06"W - 2164.80' JC2 1 02'52'17" 1285.15 15690.00 1142.60 1 S18-36'07"W 1285.12 / TO SET STONE FND. o f BOARD N/F o �54,) FENCE DONALD S. CLINE WB 97/507 I *` a IRS WIRE FENCE / Z /04' " 1 `FENCE ll )) IPF '`*47 E 372.g2� REMAINS TM 33 A C/L METAL PRCL 109 t WIRE IRS' I rLTtµH 0p c� TOWER 18.9306 AC. FENCE 700, C TOWER AL f v DAVID F. SPRIGGS cl)C/L NO. VA. No, 1853 _ ` I POWER CO. R/W / J M �+' ` HE ' 245/308 C/L METAL �� r S VEPCO R W � _ v � D SUftV \ ^ TM 33 ((A)) TOWER ` - �/` AUGUST 14, 2006 i N PRCL 1 1 O BOUNDARY SURVEY ON THE PROPERTY OF FENCE 40.1464 AC. f REMAINS ROBIN HULL & h APPROX. R/W\ , KAY MARIE MORRISON <- WB 33/254 �` VHC i a> ` MON. FND STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT o, - _ _SHED , FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA _ �• N74'57 06 W '� DATE: AUGUST 14, 2006 SCALE: 1" = 200' FENCE / WELL IRS �, 97.47' REMAINS (o 1 co o �. 4 IRS .F i �uvv MATCH LINE -SHEET 2 OF 3 TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. �2 0/ • � 200 AVIATION DRIVE WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 200 0 20o 400 Goo p J 0 (540) 667-9300 FAX (540) 667-2260 SCALE: 1 "-200' REZONING APPLICATION #05-08 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD./I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: July 16, 2008 Staff Contact: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Deputy Planning Director This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 08/06/08 Pending Board of Supervisors: 09/24/08 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to 133 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers. LOCATION: The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 33-A-109 and 33-A-110 PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) PRESENT USE: Residential and agricultural ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural PROPOSED USES: Office and Warehouse Uses 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a significant measurable impact on Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as the access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers offered in the BPG Properties/I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addressed transportation concerns associated with this request. We have the following comments: 1. The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance with Branson Springs Road in the fixtures will have a positive impact on the overall traffic movement on Route 11. 2. These proffers provide for the necessary entrance/turn lane improvements at the initial entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of site plan review. 3. While the Department recognizes that there are traffic impact deficiencies at both the Route 11 and Rest Church Road intersection and Route 11 and Brucetown/Hopewell Road intersection, it appears the best solution is to accept a monetary contribution from the applicant. This would allow Frederick County and VDOT to make fixture decisions on the appropriate use of these funds. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Frederick County, Deputy Director -Transportation: It appears that your updated TIA addressed my previous concerns regarding background traffic. While it continues to be my position that the ideal entrance for this site would align with Branson Spring Road, it appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your proffers. While it is generally the preference of staff that physical improvements be put in place as opposed to cash proffers, the right-of-way issues in this situation and the fact that the greatest needs are on property not controlled by your client make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case. I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in process right now that calls for the extension of Branson Spring Road across the northern portion of your client's property. I would ask that your client consider making accommodations for this future roadway. Fire Marshall: Plan approval recommended. Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept.: As long as the design has the standard fire codes. Department of Insnections: No Comment. Department of Public Works: No comments received for this application. COMMENTS of 2007 APPLICATION: 1. Refer to C. Site Suitability: The site description indicates that the area is underlain by carbonate sedimentary bedrock resulting in karst terrain. Indicate if the karst terrain contains sinkholes or potential piping channels. Also, indicate if the site is marked by numerous rock outcaps which will, most probably, require blasting to accommodate site development. 2. Refer to the Traffic hnpact Analysis. The proposed trip generator summary included on page 8 of the Traffic 0 • Rezoning 404-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 3 Impact Analysis (TIA) reflects the number of trips associated with 150 employees. However, the TIA has conveniently avoided the amount of truck traffic associated with the proposed distribution center. Considering the nature of the development, evaluating the truck traffic is critical in determining the real impact on the road network. Revise the TIA accordingly and resubmit. 3. Refer to F. Site Drainage: Elaborate on the statement "low impact type stormwater management techniques". We anticipate that the stormwater runoff will be dramatically increased because of the proposed development including 739,000 square feet of warehouse space, 11,000 square feet of office space, and numerous acres of pavement. Therefore, we anticipate that onsite stormwater management will be required to mitigate offsite impacts. This mitigation may also require quality as well as quantity control considering the potential for the transport of hydrocarbon contaminated runoff from the parking areas. Indicate how this potential environmental impact will be addressed in the design phase of the subject project. Frederick -Winchester Service Authority: No comments. Sanitation Authority Department: We will provide sewer and water service to this site. Department of Parks & Recreation: The Parks and Recreation Department would recommend the proffer statement include a ten foot trail on an adequate easement which to construct the trail. The trail design should meet VDOT and ASHTO guidelines. Health Department: The Health Dept. has no objection under the following conditions: 1. All buildings on site are to be served by the public water and sewer system as approved by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. 2. All wells are to be abandoned according to the Private Well Regulations. 3. All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic hauler and abandoned by filling with sand or gravel. 4. Permits are to be obtained from the Health Dept. for a proposal for a motel, hotel or restaurant. 5. All designs submitted should provide for protection of the Branson Spring from any contaminants or drainage due to the proposed future construction. Winchester Regional Airport: We have reviewed the proposed rezoning application and determined that the proposed development plan will not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. While the proposed site lies within the airport's airspace, it does fall outside of the airport's Part 77 close in surfaces; therefore, special conditional will not be requested. Frederick County Public Schools: We offer no comments. Historic Resources Advisory Board: The HRAB considered this rezoning proposal during their meeting of January 16, 2007. The HRAB reviewed information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by the applicant. At that time, the I-IRAB felt that the proffers associated with historic preservation and recognition was adequate, but made two recommendations which included: 1. Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a preliminary hlformation Form (PIF) from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, which is located on the property proposed to be rezoned. The PIP will determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can receive state recognition for its historical value. 0 0 Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 4 2. The HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the property, so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Route 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 square foot industrial structure. Attorney Comments: Comments pending PlanninjZ & ZoninlZ: 1) Site History The original Frederick County zoning map (U.S.G.S. Inwood Quadrangle) identifies the subject parcels as being zoned A-2 (Agricultural General). The County's agricultural zoning districts were subsequently combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989. The corresponding revision of the zoning map resulted in the re -mapping of the subject property and all other A-1 and A-2 zoned land to the RA District. The Applicant previously attempted to rezone these properties in 2007. Rezoning Application RZ#07-07 was denied by the Board of Supervisors on September 12, 2007. For the purposes of this current application, the request for a different zoning classification, B3 rather than M1, is substantially different from the previous request and may be processed by Frederick County pursuant to Section 165-11 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-1 J L1.1P7f IIVP The parcel comprising this rezoning application is located within the County's Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the site is within the limits of the Northeast Land Use Plan. The plan designates the site for business use. The commercial / industrial transition land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. The plan states that `Business and commercial land uses are proposed along the Martinsburg Pike corridor, on the east and west side of Interstate 81 exits 317, 321 and 323. It is envisioned that commercial uses which cater to the interstate traveler will be developed along the three Interstate 81 interchanges, while retail, service and office land uses will occur along the Martinsburg Pike corridor". 0 Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 5 Transportation Plans for new development should provide for the right-of-ways necessary to implement planned road improvements and new roads shown on the road plan should be constructed by the developer when warranted by the scale, intensity, or impacts of the development. Existing roads should be improved as necessary by adjacent development to implement the intentions of the plan (Comprehensive Plan 7-6). The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan does include this portion of the County. The Northeast Land Use Plan calls for Martinsburg Pike to be improved to a four -lane facility. The Plan also states that proposed industrial and commercial development should only occur if impacted roads function at Level of Service (LOS) Category C or better. This application does not provide that Level of Service. The Frederick County Bicycle Plan designates Route 11 as a short-term designated route. Site Access and design. The Northeast Land Use Plan discourages individual lot access on the Martinsburg Pike corridor, encourages inter -parcel connections, and recommends adequate screening from adjoining land uses and recommends greater setbacks and buffers and screening along Martinsburg Pike. This development has proffered commercial entrance limitations on Martinsburg Pike from the property. The project has also proposed interparcel comlectivity with the adjacent parcels to the north. It may be anticipated that additional development opportunities on the adjacent properties may occur in the fixture. Pedestrian accommodations have been provided along the projects frontage with Route 11. 3) Site Suitability/Envit•onment The site does not contain any environmental features that would either constrain or preclude site development. There are no identified areas of steep slopes, floodplains or woodlands. This area is also known for karst topography. The Frederick County Engineer has identified that a detailed geotechnical analysis will be needed as part of the detailed site plan design. The HRAB made two recommendations based upon the presence of the Nathaniel Branson House on the property. The HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a Preliminary Information Form (PIF) from the Department of Historic Resources (DHR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, and the HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the property, so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Route 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 square foot industrial structure. The application provides for additional landscape screening along Route 11 in an effort to tailor corridor improvements, beyond those customarily required by ordinance, to effectively eribance the corridor appearance of Route 11 and address the comments offered by the HRAB. 4) Potential Impacts Proposed Uses: The applicant has proffered that the property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses. It should be further guaranteed that additional land uses that may make up this square footage should be 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 6 limited, such as the limitation that the applicant placed on office uses, to ensure the impacts can be appropriately measured. A. Transportation Traffic Impact Analysis. The traffic impact analysis (TIA) prepared for this application was amended from the TIA that was prepared for the original rezoning request. The structure of the TIA is now acceptable to the County and VDOT as it is consistent with acceptable practices. The TIA still shows impacts at the evaluated intersections that have not been, or carmot be, addressed by the applicant. As you may recall, the TIA previously evaluated two scenarios. The amended TIA models the proffered land use scenario. The TIA indicates that Level of Service C conditions or better will be maintained on study roads and intersections with the completion of several area improvements including improvements at the intersection of Route 11/Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road and improvements at the intersection of Route 11/Rest Church Road. None of the above improvements identified in the TIA have been addressed by this application. The applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT. Transportation Program. The applicant's transportation program is limited to providing for the required access to the site via deceleration lanes and providing for a monetary contribution towards area transportation improvements that would be completed by others in the amount of $350,000. The applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT. As was the case previously, the necessary improvements identified in the TIA have not been addressed by this application. In addition, the Applicant's transportation program does not provide for or advance the County's Eastern Road Plan element of the Comprehensive Plan, in particular, the widening of Route 11. As previously noted, interparcel connectivity should be a consideration with this application. Particular attention has been paid to the property to the north of this project. The extension of Branson Springs Road to the west through this site and over Interstate 81 is a concept that has recently been discussed and should continue to be evaluated with this project and as The Northeastern Frederick Land Use Plan is being reevaluated. Additional comments from Mr. John Bishop, Frederick County Transportation Planner are summarized as follows. 1. Applicant should be preparing their site to make for an easy transition to an entrance area that aligns with Branson Springs Rd. 2. Access should be granted to the entrance mentioned in the bullet above for the property to the north. 3. Right -away should be considered for an extension of Branson Springs along the northern portion of the property. 4. Cash proffer amount is improved. 0 • Rezoning #04-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 7 C. Design Standards The Northeast Land Use Plan recommends adequate screening from adjoining land uses and recommends greater setbacks and buffers and screening along Martinsburg Pike. The site is surrounded on all sides by RA (Rural Areas) zoned property, which is either in agricultural or residential use. While it is possible that these uses may change in the future, in line with the Northeast Land Use Plan, for the moment, screening should be addressed. The project's location on a major corridor warrants particular attention. This has been provided for in this latest version of the application. Some additional clarification to allow for an improved landscaped area should be worked into the application. Consideration should also be given to screening along Interstate 81. The applicant has discussed addressing this issue and should incorporate this into the proffer statement. D. Community Facilities The development of this site will have an impact on community facilities and services. However, it is recognized that commercial uses generally provide a positive impact on community facilities through the additional generation of tax revenue. This application addresses the impacts to Fire and Rescue services by providing a monetary contribution in an amount of $10,000. Proffer Statement — Dated June 19, 2008. A) Generalized Development Plan A Generalized Development Plan has been provided by the applicant. Staff would suggest that the flexibility written into the paragraph introducing the GDP may be too flexible and should be addressed. B) Land Use The applicant has provided that the amount of office space on the property will be incorporated into the primary use structure. Further, the applicant has proffered the development of no more than 750,000 square feet. It would be advisable to further guarantee the development of the site will be for one building only, consistent with the GDP. The applicant has proffered out specific land uses. The Applicant has proffered a ten foot wide landscape strip along Route 1 1 including a variety of landscape plantings. This proffer should be expanded to allow for a broader area of plantingin the area set aside between the right-of-way and the parking setback. The applicant has proffered to employ the M 1 district setback and yard requirements for the development of this site. Rezoning 404-08 — BPG/I-81 Distribution Center July 16, 2008 Page 8 The applicant has limited the facade materials of the buildings fronting along Route 11 and Interstate 81 to a variety of materials. Proffer 7 is redundant as they are required by current ordinance. C) Transportation The Applicant's proffered transportation improvements include the dedication of an additional ten feet of right-of-way for future improvements to Route 11 to be done by others. Right turn deceleration lanes have been proffered. Tlie proffered right turn lanes are the minimum that would be required by VDOT during the development of the site. The Applicant has proffered to enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT and has proffered a $350,000 monetary contribution at the time of Certificate of Occupancy for unspecified improvements within the Route 11 corridor. Such improvements would be done by others. The Applicant has proffered to construct a ten foot wide asphalt multi -use trail along their frontage on Route 11. In general, the transportation proffer is much simplified from that previously offered The mechanism for obtaining the transportation proffer is improved and the dollar value of the proffer is more than before. However, it should be carefully evaluated to ensure that the amount is sufficient to address and mitigate the transportation impacts associated with this request. An update to the County's Development Impact Model is presently being prepared This will be a very important tool to evaluate what may be the appropriate transportation contribution for development projects. D) Community Facilities The Applicant has proffered $10,000 to Frederick County for use by Clearbrook Volunteer Fire and Rescue. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR 08/06/08 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: The B3 land use proposed in this rezoning is consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan. Many of the impacts associated with this rezoning request have been mitigated by the Applicant. However, careful consideration of the transportation impacts associated with this request and the proffered monetary contribution aimed at mitigating the impacts should occur. Transportation improvements have not been provided that would achieve a level of service C or address the Comprehensive Plan. Following the requirement for a public hearing, a recommendation by the Planning Commission to the Board of Supervisors concerning this rezoning application would be appropriate. The applicant should be prepared to adequatelV address all concerns raised bV the Planning Commission. _ _ 133»s nn� u33z�re �rtusw wwpz r — — .. e3,ne.m.a. r — I �nunuunwuummiwln _ — — � � I F I ,I ;I I I� I I I I MI I 11 � l I I I I 1 I ' li I� II i I 1 I II 1 I nwnnuuwunnmuumuummluuuwnulimn I II I II I � I " o I v3nv 30lWae axv I I R� I> o EWI d tl31Mll W71 dv-. 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 IN33b�611n f I I BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. FREDERICK COUNTY. VIRGINIA GENERALIZED DEVELOPMENT PLAN PLANT LIST- ZONING DISTRICT BUFFER TREES KEY QUAN. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME TYPE SIZE AR 85 Ace r rubrum Red Maple B&B MINIMUM 4 HT. CL 94 Cupressocyparis leylandii Le and Cypress B&B MINIMUM 4 HT. PS 75 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine B&B MINIMUM 4' HT. NOTE: FULL SCREEN 3 TREES FOR EVERY 10' OF TOTAL LENGTH 2534'/10=254 Trees (j DECIDUOUS: 85 Dec. Trees) PLANT LIST- SITE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS TREES KEY QUAN. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME TYPE SIZE AR 133 Acer rubrum Red Sunset Red Sunset Red Maple B&B MINIMUM 4 HT. PC 115 Pyrus calleryang Bradford Bradford Callery Pear B&B MINIMUM 4 HT. ZC 100 Zelkova car inifolia Elm Zelkova B&B MINIMUM 4' HT. NOTE: 1 TREE FOR 2,000 sq. ft. OF FIRST 100,000 sq. ft. IMPERVIOUS AREA. 1 TREE FOR EACH 5,000 sq. ft. OVER 100,000 sq. ft. (1,514,782 Imp. Area= 333 Trees) + 1 TREE FOR EVERY 10 SPACES (150 spaces=15 Trees) PLANT LIST.- ROUTE 11 PROFFER LANDSCAPING TREES KEY QUAN. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME TYPE SIZE CL 20 Cup essocyparis le andii Le and Cypress B&B MINIMUM 4 HT. PS 23 Pinus strobus Eastern White Pine B&B MINIMUM 4 HT. ZC 20 Zelkova car inifolia Elm Zelkova B&B MINIMUM 4' HT. SHRUBS KEY QUAN. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME TYPE SIZE BS 200 Buxus sem ervirens Boxwood Container 18"-36" HT. CA 175 Clethra alnifolia Summersweet Clethra Container — JC 150 Juni erus communis Common Juniper Container 18"-36" HT. NOTE: 3 TREES FOR EVERY 100'; 25 SHRUBS FOR EVERY 100' (2077'/100=21; 21 x3=63 Trees; 21 x25=525 Shrubs) • u I I 1 -------------- U.S. RT. 11 (80. WIDE) sal I 1-81 (R/W VARIES) vEPCo " I ' C/L NO. VA. 1 POWER CO. R/W 245/308 �—_- _ — --- _.._- 2Y SETBACK - - - -.._— -- _-- - � I : I TRAILED PARKING >h I 'I I1 i POSSIBLE UUILMNG FOOTPRINT Z la C P 1 i I I I pz I I ]J7 I Ii I TRAILER PARKING J ROPOSED 101RAY DEDICATNJy- .. _ AN SCRE I Q WLGE PR FF RED LDS _. I PYADE PROFFERED I I 1L ENTRANQ I I I - ROPOSEDIPTRAIL FUTURE ENTRANCE 5 �S oa W N F J Z oo zU W d dY ZQ v W J aW m� W W GDP • DRRS Meeting - June 26, 2008: Introduction: • Request to allow building height to 45' • Display boards to illustrate our request • The height request is typical of what is required by users and developers Board A.1- Exterior Elevation Starting from Finished Floor: • Racking — most users utilize racking to organize product and allow for higher stacking plans (25' to 28') • Clearance for ESFR sprinkler: 3' • Underside of Joist: 32' 3" • Top of Structure: 41' 6" (from finished floor) Board A.2 — Elevation Cross Section — Finished Floor and Loading Dock Area: • Finished Floor Elevation (41' 6") vs. Loading Dock Elevation (45' 6") • Calculation for total building height @ 32' clear • Average of the four sides of the building: 43' 6" Board A.3 — Exterior Renderina: • Finished Floor Elevation vs. Loading Dock Elevation • Parapet (not included in height calculations) • Example of users: ■ Solaris Paper in Shenandoah County ■ PlyGem Industries in Rockingham County ■ Home Depot in Frederick County Route 11 Perspective: • Distance from Route 11 to building: approximately 300' it Tom. PANEL / PARAPET �JALL a -Ow 'CI\T E_. -42'-6 — — — — �w Rs 0.5 9 RIDGE L NE r i1e- POINT) EL. SF'RINK_ER L NE O.S a LOW - ----- - —- s �7 GCNCRE-E JA-L PANEL j 1 u RACKINC3 / O 7 (� I11 T CO Q / I m �7 SFRI\<LER �'NE RAG<'NG — .C. VANE_ / =ARA=E' - A'---4 -42 .O.S RIGGE LINE ,14C- POINT) y E_. +4' -6 — — E_. -32 -Y CO\CRETE ILA._._ =A\E_ F R°- F_CCR /. \ - — —FIRS" F_OOR F711=—=lI . u�iul— ktim t� WJAX fit,! :Iilf ` �1A �lou n WL W ' IIaIF m m W'�hll—IL Ii�flll� :: o_ �L. . W.il - I11I9 `- 4'-0 rug III rn-_-- IDIf� I I t WALL SECTION 2 SECTION ® LOADING DOCK A.2 Scale: NTS A.2 Scale: NTS PROPOSED WAREHOUSE BUILDING FOR: ,11/ BPG Properties, Ltd. REVISIONS WALL sECTIONs rtu uac aoums _ BPG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L_P. WULFF ARCHITECTS, INC. � saoc � 5��0,� W�,1 o Mo,(2 5,.n, �.; :elphc. " 19103 1-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER J, (715i 196-IX7 0/ Prcpct NOT 70 SCALE •2 t960/31 FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA �JL24E 24, 2008 AL� z A2 INE 1 ENLARGED ELEVATION A.1 Scale: NTS PROPOSED WAREHOUSE BUILDING FOR: BPG Properties. Ltd. BPG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.C. WULFF ARCHITECTS, INC. croc Centre scuae we: 1-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER e vo ;)GJ "96 C4C NOT TO SCALE v " "96 0411 .. o:—�r DUNE 24, 2008 AL, -I FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA _ 0 1 I / m i i I X11A {I Ll L- -'' =�AE_/PARAPET EN -RANGE E_ -4:'-6 R CAE L \_ S E_ -41 6 E_ -6 v = R5T ti VIEW OF BUILDING FROM NORTHEAST I-8I DISTRIBUTION CENTER :' Development w......�.,..�.,.,.� FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Company, L.P. PROPOSED WAREHOU5E BUILDING NM BNG ��o[>e,tes. Ltd. REVISIONS �w as aew�s PER5PEGTIVE BPG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P. WULFF ARCHITECTS, INC. � � I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER NOT TO 5GALE FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA DU�a�� NE 24, 2008 0 i. AMENDMENT Action: PLANNING COMMISSION: September 17, 2008 - Recommended Approval BOARD OF SUPERVISORS: September 24, 2008 Q APPROVED ❑ DENIED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP REZONING #05-08 OF BPG PROPERTIES, LTD./I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER WHEREAS, Rezoning 905-08 of BPG Properties, LTD./I-81 Distribution Center, submitted by BPG Properties, Ltd., to rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers last dated September 17, 2008, for Office and Warehouse Uses was considered. The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill Road (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 33-A-109 and 33-A- 110, in the Stonewall Magisterial District. '`.WHEREAS, the Plamzing Commission held a public hearing on this rezoning on August 6, 2008, and a public meeting on September 17, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this rezoning on September 24, 2008; and WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the approval of this rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, and in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors that Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, is amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District for Office and Warehouse uses, subject to the attached conditions voluntarily proffered in writing by the applicant and the property owner. PDRes. #27-08 0 This ordinance shall be in effect on the date of adoption. Passed this 24th day of September, 2008 by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle, Chairman Aye Gary A. Lofton Aye Gary W. Dove Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Philip A. Lemieux Aye A COPY ATTEST John R. lei `e�, Jr. FredericvCounty Administrator PDRes. #27-08 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: REVISION DATE: REVISION DATE: REVISION DATE: REVISION DATE: June 19, 2008 July 3, 2008 July 21, 2008 August 25, 2008 September 17, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions to parking layout and the location of structures to accommodate the potential for multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 2 of 7 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the M1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude from the Property warehouse facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. 2.16 Food stores or groceries. 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will construct entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 3 of 7 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be used exclusively for costs associated with improvements necessary for the issuance of a VDOT entrance permit for the Future Entrance and shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easernent over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of the first site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 4 of 7 of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, drainage and grading improvements upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($550,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first building permit for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, for fire and rescue purposes. 5. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.13.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Storniwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 5 of 7 7.3. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 11 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Dedication of Right —of -Way for Branson Spring Road Extension. Upon VDOT's approval of a functional plan for the extension of Branson Spring Road through the Property in a location generally consistent with the current termination point of that Road and parallel to the northern property line of the Property (the `Branson Spring Road Extension"), the Applicant shall, upon written request from the County or VDOT, dedicate not more than 100 feet of right-of-way from that property line to the County at no cost. No additional landscaping, buffering or setbacks shall be required of the Applicant as a consequence of such dedication. 10. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 7 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC its General Partner By: Name: Daniel M. DiLella, Jr. Its: Vice President STATE OF COUNTY/C--fT-Y 00 ������,�G�To-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this f 0day of 2008, by Daniel M. DiLella, Jr., as Vice President of BP -GP, LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. My commission expires: Gt't'f"� 3(, Awl Registration Number: [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 7 of 7 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: CU Name: Kay M. Bo ce Title: Executor Kay Marie B yce STATE OF V-:F(,,J.,:-A C-GbWT=Y/CITY OF L,-IE c,, i4c�-rcr� , To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this!/'day of 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC M connnission expires: L(z,Q5 i 13� , UtzW—MY LORETTa M. WILSON y p %� Notary Public Commonwealth of VirginiaReRe istration Number: 0 � _� 63 � g. #s s. Augg Commission Exps, Aug. 31, 2009 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 21, 2008 REVISION DATE: August 25, 2008 REVISION DATE: September 17, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions i- U1* e�i 1 the —event the ppiteant elects to G^"s to accommodate the potential for multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: 1. Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 8 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the M1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude from the Property warehouse facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. 2.16 Food stores or groceries. 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will pfov- leconstruct entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 3 of 8 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably witliheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be used exclusively for costs associated with improvements necessary for the issuance of a VDOT entrance permit for the Future Entrance and shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any i the first site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 4 of 8 outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, drainage and grading improvements upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($550,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first re,-ti fieate of n,,,,uP ,, ...building permit for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to —assist in fim k+vg for fire and rescue ape�^+i�nr� iii the EeNntypR oses. 5. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 fi•ontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.13.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of 8 7.3. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 11 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Dedication of Right —of -Way for Branson Spring Road Extension. Upon VDOT's approval of a functional Ulan for the extension of Branson Suring Road through the Property in a location generally consistent with the current termination point of that Road and parallel to the northern property line of the Property (the `Branson Spring Road Extension"), the Applicant shall, upon written request fi•om the County or VDOT, dedicate not more than 100 feet of right-of-way fi•om that property line to the County at no cost. No additional landscaping, buffering or setbacks shall be required of the Applicant as a consequence of such dedication. 10. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 8 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: Name: Daniel M. DiLella, Jr. Its: Vice President STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Daniel M. DiLella, Jr., as Vice President of BPG-GP, LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 7 of 8 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: Narne: Kay M. Title: Executor Boyce Kay Marie Boyce STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: 0 • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 21, 2008 REVISION DATE: August 25, 2008 REVISION DATE: September 17, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conforinance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions re-qldifed i1i the event the ^,,, heanfs tto parking layout and the location of structures to accommodate T7-iL�717111iG11 L V the potential for multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: l . Land Use Restrictions. I.I. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and pennitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 8 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the MI District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude from the Property warehouse facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. 2.16 Food stores or groceries. 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will Prev-id construct entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Departinent of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 3 of 8 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be used exclusively for costs associated with improvements necessary for the issuance of a VDOT entrance permit for the Future Entrance and shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of a i *aI he first site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 4of8 outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, drainage and grading improvements upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($550,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first CeFtif eate of C)ee-u ane-ybuilding permit for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building perinit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, toassistin fund-ingfor fire and rescue epefatiens--in the G&ui -ypurposes. 5. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no bean or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot bean or hedgerow along the Route l l frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.13.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. BPG Properties • . Proffer Statement Page 5 of 8 7.3. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 11 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Dedication of Right —of -Way for Branson Spring Road Extension. Upon VDOT's approval of a functional plan for the extension of Branson Spring Road through the Property in a location generally consistent with the current termination point of that Road and parallel to the northern property line of the Property (the `Branson Spring Road Extension"), the Applicant shall, upon_ written request from the County or VDOT, dedicate not more than 100 feet of right-of-way from that property line to the County at no cost. No additional landscaping buffering or setbacks shall be required of the Applicant as a consequence of such dedication. 10. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] 0 • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 21, 2008 REVISION DATE: August 25, 2008 REVISION DATE: September 17, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The tern "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions fequiied i the eve to parking layout and the location of structures to accommodate the potential for multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: 1. Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 2of8 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the MI District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude fiorn the Property warehouse facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. 2.16 Food stores or groceries. 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide -construct entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 3 of 8 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be used exclusively for costs associated with improvements necessary for the issuance of a VDOT entrance permit for the Future Entrance and shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any Athe first site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 4of8 outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, drainage and grading E improvements upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sure of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($550,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Ge-Ftifieate of Oeoupatie building permit for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist if fun gi• for fire and rescue epe--Fatieris in the nu loses. 5. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.13.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. BPG Properties ! • Proffer Statement Page 5 of 8 7.3. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 11 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Dedication of Right —of -Way for Branson Spring Road Extension. Upon VDOT's approval of a functional Ulan for the extension of Branson Springy Road through the Property in a location generally consistent with the current termination point of that Road and parallel to the northern property line of the Property (the `Branson Spring Road Extension"), the Applicant shall upon written request from the County or VDOT dedicate not more than 100 feet of right-of-way from that property line to the County at no cost No additional landscaping, buffering or setbacks shall be required of the Applicant as a consequence of such dedication. 10. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: REVISION DATE: REVISION DATE: REVISION DATE: June 19, 2008 July 3, 2008 July 21, 2008 August 25, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 7 0 11 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the M1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 29 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude from the Property warehouse facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. 2.16 Food stores or groceries. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of 7 easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably wit1-11eld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways; and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirinatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($550,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. BPG Properties Proffer Statement The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. Site landscaping. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route I 1 Buffer. The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 1 I and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. Site development requirements. All utilities will be underground. Stonnwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 11 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of 7 the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties 0 Proffer Statement Page 6 of 7 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: Nail: Bart' Howard Its: Chairman of the Board STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF ����` , To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisA—f day of _, 2008, by Barry Howard, as Chairman of the Board of BPG-G0 LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. 0 �' / A-f- - L-111 NOTAR47 PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA My commission expi es: NOTARIAL SEAL CHERYL WALMSLEY, Notary Public Registration Number City of Philadelphia, Phila. County M Commission Expires Jul 18, 2009 [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 7 of 7 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: e., Name: Kay M. 40yee Title: Executor 4 dL_ Kay Marie B yce STATE OF OY/CITY OF t�J�N��z , To -wit: 7► The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisd&, day of La, P Z!; , , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. (Xe-f-v�-do- f�GJ-& NOTARY PUBLIC M commission expires: A ic--,tf's e j9 �9�rJ ' �&My LORETTA M. WILSON Y p Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Reg. #363036 Registration Number: ��- 3 6-36 Commission Exps. Aug. 31, 2009 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: REVISION DATE REVISION DATE REVISION DATE June 19, 2008 July 3, 2008 July 21, 2008 August 25, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: 1. Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 7 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the M 1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude from the Property warehouse facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. 2.16 Food stores or groceries. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) clays after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of 7 easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($550,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 1 1 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 4 of 7 The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. 5. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. 7.3. Prior- to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 1 1 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of 7 the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 7 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: / Nai: Barry Howard Its: Chairman of the Board STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF S2/ X, -,To-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this'#3 day of 2008, by Barry Howard, as Chairman of the Board of BPG-G0 LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. NOTARk PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVA=Ju118, IA My commission expiECHERYL NO WAublicRegistration Numberity of PhilantyCommissio, 2009 [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 7of7 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By e,., Name: Kay M. qoyce Title: Executor Kay Marie B yce STATE OF 1�RC�:L7�I`Li1 C-GUN-T--'/CITY OF U �1CNf--5-/c--E- , To -wit: 7i The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisd& day of AC46 u zni " , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. C�reju_da_ f�' N'�&m_ NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Apt(-1us r J "10/n 7 -ORET M. WiLSON � OMy Nottao ry Public Commonwealth of Virginia Registration Number: v�.36,36 Reg. #363036 Commission Exps. Aug. 31, 2009 T R A N S M I T T A L* T T E R • TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering • Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Services • Land Surveying Construction Testing & Monitoring ' Drilling Water & Wastewater I Landscape Architecture To: Frederick Co. Planning & Development 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Michael Ruddv WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 667-9300 (540) 667-2260 facsimile www.triadeng.com Date: 26 August 2008 Re: 1-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Proffers Project No.: I COPIES DATED NUMBER I DESCRIPTION I 1 08-25-08 1 Proffer Statement for the 1-81 Distribution Center THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Other ❑ For Your Use ® For Review and Comment REMARKS qOr, 2 2008 COPY TO: SIGNED: 0; Z) �V / , / Dennie D. Dunlap III If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center , PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 21, 2008 REVISION DATE: August 25, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. I.I. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 7501000 s uare feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties • • Proffer Statement Page 2 of 7 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall 7.5 e there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. �s y� 1.3. he Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided /n the M1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.15 Building materials, hardware, garden supply, mobile home dealers and retail nurseries, provided that this proffer does not exclude from the Property warehouse / facilities that store and distribute goods associated with these uses. V 2.16 Food stores or groceries. 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property. The first such entrance shall be constructed along Route 11 in the general location identified on the GDP as the "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting ( VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. t') to' r The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access 0� 3'3 BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 3 of 7 easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed as provided herein, the Applicant shall close the Initial Entrance and shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be made to the party designated by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is 1 t £ �> opened for public use, -though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. ; �. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the r benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access c {� to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. �' 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to—grimiric Qunty the sum of Five Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dolly ($550,000.00) t be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, paym a e at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. j 4. Fire and Rescue. BPG Properties • • Proffer Statement Page 4of7 The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. 5. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.7 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.13.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western / property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. a 1 7.3. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit for a building on the Property, the Applicant shall construct a split rail fence no more than five feet in height along the Property's Route 11 frontage in a location to be determined by the Applicant in consultation with the County. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 5 of 7 the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 7 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By - Nail ff6.:Barry Howard Its: Chairman of the Board STATE OF CYk COUNTY/CITY OF —�<�4 , , To -wit: The foregoing instrument was aclaiowledged before me thisWjLH-day of 2008, by Barry Howard, as Chairman of the Board of BPG-Glo LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. 0 L / Al'- "' NOTAR PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA My commission expi es: NOTARIAL SEAL CHERYL WALMSLEY, Notary Public Registration Number City of Philadelphia, Phila. County M Commission Expires Jul 18, 2009 [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 7 of 7 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By k" C� Naive: Kay M. 40yee Title: Executor Kay Marie B yee STATE OF 'ra &jj-J1� 1 GOUNT-Y/CITY OF Lk _-DJ0_o 6r-c Z_ , To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisd& day of f_1 C16--, U _t� 1 , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. C- L NOTARY PUBLIC M commission expires: A�ti��tis s '3d ������ TMy LORETTa M. WILSON Y 1 Notary Public Commonwealth of Virginia Registration Number: 63(-,3D- 6Reg• #assoss Commission Exps. Aug. 31, 2009 0 • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 6 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the M1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property constructed along Route 11 and in the general location identified on the GDP as "Initial Entrance", which entrance shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. Such Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and the right turn lane into such entrance. The Applicant shall also grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.3. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.4. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of 6 shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.5. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sure of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in fielding fire and rescue operations in the County. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.2 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 4 of 6 Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a frill copy of these proffers in order to frilly advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of 6 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LL its General Partner By: Naive: Christop er J. L atell Its: Vice President STATE OF RL COUNTY/CITY OF JLC , To -wit: n� The fo egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / day of 2008, by Christopher J. Locatell, as Vice President of BP - P, L C, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. l atraL� NO ARY PUBLIC' COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA My commission expires: . NOTARIAL SEAL MARY T. BROWN, Notary Public City of Philadelphia, Phila. County Registration Number: My Commission Expires March 24, 2012 [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 6 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: Name: Kay NY Boyce Title: Executor Ka'a fiq _' / Kay Marie Poyce STATE OF VrRC j7t4_— 1 06FJNY/CITY OFTo-wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this IRday of _ y , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: AvA , us-r -a /, 0000 9 Registration Number: J6 3 6,36 • 0 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 21, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of permitted uses, as those uses are modified hereby, which 750,000 square feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 7 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the M1 District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property constructed along Route 11 and in the general location identified on the GDP as "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. The Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary constriction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the constriction of the Future Entrance and an associated right turn lane into such Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of 7 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed by others, the Applicant shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be made to the party deemed responsible by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: i) the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accepted into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. Site landscaping. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 4 of 7 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.2 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.13.1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear parking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of 7 [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 7 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: Name Its: Daniel M. DiLella, Jr. Vice President STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Daniel M. DiLella, Jr., as Vice President of BPG-GP, LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 7 of 7 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: Name: Kay M. Title: Executor Boyce Kay Marie Boyce STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: 0 • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #07-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 REVISION DATE: July 3.2008 REVISION DATE: July 21.2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of uses permitted under the ^ plieable zening, as medi a harel3yuses. as those uses are modified hereby, which 750.000 sauare feet and permitted uses shall be located entirely within one building or within multiple buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of -77 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the Ml District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking 3. Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property constructed along Route 11 and in the general location identified on the GDP as "Initial Entrance," which shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. 3.3. Reute 11 and in the general leeatien identified en the GDP as "Inifial ERtr-aflee", N"Dr'��ehThe Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant, at its expense, within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of -7 Entrance and thean associated right turn lane into such NllCle t,.n,. afleo The ,Bean shall also grant „+ ever- the Dr.,pert„ t ,,n f-of the benefit of the J11U11 U1JV �r Ull� Ull µcceJJ eClJlJ111V111. Ull� 1 Entranee.Entrance, provided that the Applicant expressly approves of the plans for improvements associated with the Future Entrance, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. 3.4. At such time as the Future Entrance is constructed by others, the Applicant shall pay fifty (50) percent of the total audited costs incurred in constructing the Future Entrance to VDOT standards, which may include signalization thereof, such payment not to exceed $125,000.00. The "not to exceed" value of $125,000.00 is subject to the Escalator Clause set forth below and represents the Applicant's estimate of fifty (50) percent of the total costs of replacing the Initial Entrance and constructing a right turn lane deceleration lane and traffic signal at the Future Entrance's intersection with Route 11. The payment required by this Proffer 3.4 shall be made to the party deemed responsible by the Zoning Administrator for the construction of the Future Entrance upon written demand of the Zoning Administrator and within thirty (30) days after the following conditions have been met: it the Future Entrance is opened for public use, though not accented into the State System of Secondary Highways, and ii) the party responsible therefor provides the Zoning Administrator satisfactory proof of its audited costs. 3.5. The Applicant shall grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.6. 1-1-The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement for the Initial Entrance with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.7. 3A—. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.8. 3.5-.-The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 4 of -7 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. Site landscaping. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a ten (10) root wide landscape strip adjaeent--tewithin the area between the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.2 to be eenstr- iete along w vv � Re=ite1 !-and the narking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer")., The Route 11 Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the te,., (, m feet wide landseaoee €rentage.Route 11 Buffer. 5.2 The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance 5165-36.B 1, or equivalent) in the area between the rear narking area the Property's western property line at a rate of no fewer than one tree per forty (40') linear feet 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. 8. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of -77 Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 77 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: Name: Daniel M. DiLella, Jr. Its: Vice President STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Daniel M. DiLella, Jr., as Vice President of BPG-GP, LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 0 BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 7 of -77 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: Name: Kay M. Title: Executor Boyce Kay Marie Boyce STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: 0 0 PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ 907-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-1 10; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: 1-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: Jule 19, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and fixture owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1. I. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of uses permitted under the applicable zoning, as modified hereby. 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the stfucture(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Pfopefty. BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 2 of 6 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for use in the M I District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 Di: Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Proper 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classi 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service emplo, 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transpor 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking Transportation Mitieation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance i consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requ 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property constructed 1 I and in the general location identified on the GDP as "Initial Entra entrance shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Brar Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County Such Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant within thirty (_ all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the P1 been constructed by others in the general location identified on the G "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entran right ttn-n lane into such entrance. The Applicant shall also grant an easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining pai north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.3. 'file Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT condition of final site plan approval. 3.4. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's ROritt that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right -of --way. Suc BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of 6 shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.5. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such funds may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. 5. Site landscapin;;. 5.1. The Applicant shall provide a landscape strip within the area, between ad{ac -to-the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.2 and the parking area identified on the GDP that is a minimum of ten (10) feet in width (the "Route 11 Buffer-). to be—eeHstfueted aIeng, -Rotes, The Route 1 I Buffer shall be comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance § 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route l 1 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the Route I I Butter. ten (18) fbot Nvide The Applicant also agrees that the total number of trees within the o place within thROUte I I Buffer will be is kiil Seape Sr.:.. no less than two hundred and thirty (230 which trees may be credited to%�ard the Applicant's supplemew ;he g .,I„ ng rh.,r 4: � The Applicant shall plant street trees (per Zoning Ordinance � 165-36.B.1, or equivalent);n the area bet\\een the rear parking area the Property's western propert\ line at a rate of no tewer than one tree per forty (401) linear feet. which trees slim be credited toward the Applicant's landscaping requirements under Zoning Ordinance § 165(E)(I 1). Architectural. 1 .. h;,1 it a o � Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.5", Tabs: 1", Left + Not at 1.7" Formatted: Bullets and Numbering Formatted: Character scale: 100% Formatted: Normal, Left, Indent: Left: 0.5", Hanging: 0.5", Space After: 0 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 2 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5", Tabs: Not at 1.5" Formatted: Character scale: 100% Formatted: Character scale: 100% BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 4 of 6 Facing materials of buildings facing Route 1 I and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or sinurlated wood or glass. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. 8. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an attachment and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to fully advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U fi•om that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 5 of 6 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: Name Its: Daniel M. DiLella, Jr. Vice President STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2008, by Daniel M. DiLella, Jr., as Vice President of BPG-GP, LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties • Proffer Statement Page 6 of 6 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: Name: Kay M. Boyce Title: Executor Kay Marie Boyce STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: • PROFFER STATEMENT REZONING: RZ #0-7-07 RA to B-3 (Industrial Transition) PROPERTY: ±59 Acres, Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109 RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. and Kay Marie Boyce APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd. and/or its assigns PROJECT NAME: I-81 Distribution Center PROFFER DATE: June 19, 2008 The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property ("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions, which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of Supervisors' (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate court. The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience of reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its meaning all present and future owners and successors in interest. The development of the Property shall be in general conformance with the plan entitled "BPG Properties, Ltd., Frederick County, Virginia, Generalized Development Plan" dated June 19, 2008, (the "GDP"), subject to reasonable changes approved by the County in connection with Master Development Plan and Final Site Plan review, including revisions required for final engineering considerations, code and regulatory compliance, and revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property. The Applicant hereby proffers the following: Land Use Restrictions. 1.1. The Property shall be developed with not more than seven hundred fifty thousand (750,000) square feet of uses permitted under the applicable zoning, as modified hereby. 1.2. Office uses may be employed on the Property only as accessory uses and shall be located entirely within the structure(s) for the primary use(s). In no event shall there be stand-alone office buildings on the Property. BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 2 of 6 1.3. The Applicant shall employ the yard and setback requirements for uses as provided in the Ml District, rather than those otherwise applicable to the B3 District. 2. Proffered -Out Uses. The following uses shall not be permitted on the Property. 2.1 Transportation By Air and all Uses Classified as SIC 45 2.2 Transportation Services, and all Uses Classified as SIC 47 2.3 Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations and all Uses Classified as SIC 55 2.4 Restaurant, except food services as may be provided to service employees on site 2.5 Amusement and recreation services operated indoors 2.6 Drive-in motion picture theaters 2.7 Local and suburban transit and interurban highway passenger transportation 2.8 Outdoor ad services 2.9 Automobile recovery service 2.10 Automotive repair, services and parking 2.11 Automobile repossession service 2.12 Product sterilization service 2.13 Repossession service 2.14 Automotive repair, services and parking Transportation Mitigation. 3.1. At the entrance to the Property, the Applicant will provide entrance improvements consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements. 3.2. There shall be no more than one entrance to the Property constructed along Route 11 and in the general location identified on the GDP as "Initial Entrance", which entrance shall be separated at least 700' from the intersection of Branson Spring Road and Route 11, unless otherwise approved by Frederick County and VDOT. Such Initial Entrance shall be closed by the Applicant within thirty (30) days after all of the following conditions have been met: i) an entrance to the Property has been constructed by others in the general location identified on the GDP as "Future Entrance" and ii) a right turn and deceleration lane meeting VDOT requirements has been constructed by others into the Future Entrance. The Applicant shall grant any necessary construction, grading and access easements over the Property necessary for the construction of the Future Entrance and the right turn lane into such entrance. The Applicant shall also grant an access easement over the Property to and for the benefit of the adjoining parcel to the north of the Property to accommodate access to the Future Entrance. 3.3. The Applicant shall enter into a signalization agreement with VDOT as a condition of final site plan approval. 3.4. The Applicant shall dedicate right-of-way along the Property's Route 11 frontage that is ten (10) feet wide from the existing edge of right-of-way. Such dedication BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 3 of 6 shall be made prior to the approval of any final site plan for development of the Property. The Applicant shall construct a ten (10) foot wide asphalt trail outside of but adjacent to said right-of-way, and dedicate an easement to the County for public purposes for such trail, upon written request by the County. The maintenance of the asphalt trial shall be the responsibility of the owner of the Property or a property owner's association created for such purpose, unless and until the County affirmatively assumes maintenance of the trail in writing. 3.5. The Applicant will contribute to Frederick County the sum of Three Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($350,000.00) to be used for improvements in the Route 11 north corridor, payment to be made at the time of issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for a use on the Property. Such fiords may be used by the Board in its discretion for transportation improvements. 4. Fire and Rescue. The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the first building permit for the Property, for use by the Board in its discretion, to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County. Site landscaping. The Applicant shall provide a ten (10) foot wide landscape strip adjacent to the asphalt trail identified in Proffer 3.2 to be constructed along Route 11, comprised of three street trees (per Zoning Ordinance §165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one hundred linear feet, and twenty-five shrubs per one hundred linear feet. These plantings shall be in addition to those required by the County's buffering and screening requirements. If no berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage is otherwise required, the Applicant agrees to install a three foot berm or hedgerow along the Route 11 frontage within the ten (10) foot wide landscape strip. The Applicant also agrees to place within this landscape strip no less than two hundred and thirty (230) trees to supplement the screening along that frontage. 6. Architectural. Facing materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily of concrete masonry Lunt, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or real or simulated wood or glass. 7. Site development requirements. 7.1. All utilities will be underground. 7.2. Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant. Deed. The Applicant proffers and agrees that any deed conveying the Property shall affix as an BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 4 of 6 attaclunent and incorporation into said deed, a full copy of these proffers in order to frilly advise any subsequent purchaser of these proffered terms and conditions. 9. Escalator. In the event the monetary contributions set forth in the Proffer Statement are paid to Frederick County within eighteen (18) months of the approval of this rezoning, as applied for by the Applicant, said contributions shall be in the amounts as stated herein. Any monetary contributions set forth in this Proffer Statement which are paid to the County after eighteen (18) months following the approval of this rezoning shall be adjusted in accordance with the Urban Consumer Price Index ("CPI-U") published by the United States Department of Labor, such that at the time contributions are paid they shall be adjusted by the percentage change in the CPI-U from that date eighteen (18) months after the approval of this rezoning to the most recently available CPI-U to the date the contributions are paid, subject to a cap of 6 percent (6%) per year, noncompounded. [SIGNATURES AND NOTARIES APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGES] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 5 of 6 BPG PROPERTIES, LTD. By: BPG-GP, LLC, its General Partner By: Name: Its: Daniel M. DiLella, Jr. Vice President STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 20085 by Daniel M. DiLella, Jr., as Vice President of BPG-GP, LLC, General Partner of BPG Properties, Ltd. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: [SIGNATURE AND NOTARY APPEAR ON FOLLOWING PAGE] BPG Properties Proffer Statement Page 6 of 6 ESTATE OF ROY RILEY BOYCE, JR. By: Name: Kay M. Title: Executor Boyce Kay Marie Boyce STATE OF COUNTY/CITY OF To -wit: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2008, by Kay M. Boyce as Executor of the Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. NOTARY PUBLIC My commission expires: Registration Number: • • C: • z .00Z�.1 •MOOS � DnN�q VINVAUSNN3d'OMOBSN33b0 OVA1ASNN d'98n9 N33 NV-ld 1N31Nd0�3A3a n p c� QIWL VIN1029A 1S3M'NM0INV080VY VSNV91V 1S VINIONIA'311IA113ound 4 NAMHONIM '] �,../\I C� a 3 Z I� V a 3 N 119 C O p 042U LL��LC �•W �yd dq u00t SNOIlV Ol O • •EQ rr CWdW :� -W vow � �-m-ow W.4 oor.-ap-*" *W soozz VRgMV� 'MIS31HONN1 VINIMM ')dNnoo >10183a38J o = U o c �onu dll 'S3112l3d02ld Jd8 u �J _ �— __ am-at-W:gm ''1N1 `')NI?I��NI�N3 db/lZll I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I vo W I I i 1 7 w 3 a B FF R (FULL SCREEN) _. 75' INACTIVE BUFFER 25' ACTIVE BUFFS w < Q Q 00 (n ui g U I TRAILER PARKING a w AND STORAGE AREA Q I 1 � 1 1 w U z 9 z z w w 1 LL 1 J 1 , 1 b I 1 0 1 0 1 I a 1 O 1 1 a w Iw a I 1 Lu o I 1 3 I b I I I I I w U Z 1 9 I I w I I Z Y Q m W N LU LW I I 1 I I Iw( o, I I Qw laa 00 I I bz g I I I II m "a— -- --- �— 25' ACTIVE BUFFER — ' ' —I �_- 75' INACTIVE BUFFER — " — J I I I I 1 I I 1 I W 0 I � i p 100 I 1 � I N I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 , PROFFER STATEMENT M ,CA �,7�err. July 21, 2008 Mr. Dernlie Dunlap III, P.E. Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, Virginia 22602 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Public Works 540/665-5643 FAX: 540/ 678-0682 RE: Revised Rezoning Application for Proposed I-81 Distribution Center, Clearbrook, Virginia Dear Mr. Dunlap: We have completed our review of the revised rezoning application for the proposed I-81 distribution center and offer the following comments: 1. Refer to B. Locations and Access: Correct the narrative to reflect a single access point as indicated in the proffer statement and as implied on the generalized development plan. 2. Refer to C. Site Suitability: a. Refer to our previous comment dated February 26, 2007, regarding the karst terrain and the potential for sinkhole development. b. The boundary survey shown on sheet 3 of 3 indicates the existence of power line right-of-ways. The narrative needs to be expanded to discuss the impact of these right-of-ways on the proposed development. Also, the boundary survey needs to be revised to reflect the correct power company names. c. The narrative needs to be expanded to include the description and disposition of the existing buildings. 3. Refer to F. Site Drainage: Refer to our previous comment #3 in our February 26, 2007, review related to the term "low impact type stormwater management techniques." The narrative needs to be revised to describe this method of stormwater management. The Department of Conservation and Recreation will require that BMP measures be implemented to address quality as well as quantity issues related to stormwater runoff. We also recommend that 107 North Kent Street . Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 I-81 Distribution C(Or — Revised Rezoning Comments Page 2 July 21, 2008 oil separators be utilized in the truck parking areas to augment the efficiency of the BMP measures. I can be reached at 722-8214 if you should have any questions regarding the above comments. Sincerely, Harvey E. Straw"snyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Public Works HES/rls cc: Planning and Development file T:\rsargent\Rhonda\TEMPCOMMENTS\1-81DISTCTRREVREZCOM.doe HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL �/(� A PARTNERSHIP OF PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS JR 1 8 20, ATTORNEYS AT LAW WILBUR C. HALL (1892-1972) THOMAS V. MONAHAN (1924-19991 7 d 307 EAST MARKET STREET 9 EAST 505CAWEN STREET SAMUEL D. ENGLE LEESBURG, VIRGINIA WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 0. LELAND MAHAN TELEPHONE 703-777-1050 TELEPHONE 540-662-3200 ROBERT T. MITCHELL, JR. FAx 540-662-4304 NAMES A. KLENKAR E-MAIL lawyers@hallmonahan.com STEVEN F. JACKSON July 18, 2008 HAND -DELIVERED Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Director Frederick County Department of Planning & Development 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Re: I-81 Distribution Center (13PG Properties, Ltd.) Proposed Proffer Statement Dear Mike: PLEASE REPLY TO. P. 0. Box 848 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604-0848 I have reviewed the above -referenced proposed Proffer Statement, with a revision date of July 3, 2008. It is my opinion that the Proffer Statement is generally in a form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia, subject to the following comments: 1. The third unnumbered paragraph of the Proffer Statement references the Generalized Development Plan (GDP). It should be noted that the proffer- for the development to be in general conformance with the GDP is subject to certain conditions, including "revisions required in the event the Applicant elects to construct multiple buildings on the Property". I would recommend that this condition be limited to changes in the location of structures and parking on the site, so that the entrance, buffers, setbacks, etc., shown on the GDP would still apply in the event multiple buildings are constructed on the site. HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL Michael T. Ruddy, AICP July 18, 2008 Page 2 2. Proffer 2 proffers out certain otherwise permitted uses on the Property. Staff should review the proffered -out uses to determine if all of the uses appropriate to be proffered out are included, taking into consideration the Applicant's possible intended uses of the Property. It also should be noted that in Proffers 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 all uses in the related SIC category have been proffered out, while in the remaining proffered -out uses all of the associated uses in the related SIC category have not been proffered out. 3. In Proffer 3.1, I would recommend changing the word "provide" to "construct". Further, it is noted that the entrance improvements proffered are those "consistent with Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) requirements". This language has been substituted for the previous draft of the Proffer Statement which specifically provided for a right turn deceleration lane. Staff should determine whether the revised language is preferable. 4. In Proffer 3.2, regarding the entrance to the property, it is not clear to me from the Proffers (it may be clear to staff) what would be in place upon the construction of the Future Entrance. Is the plan to have this Property and the adjoining property to the north served off of a right-of-way on the Applicant's property, and that it will be the responsibility of that adjoining property owner to construct the entrance? If this is the anticipated plan, it would seem to me that the matters of the buffers along the north property line, as shown on the GDP, will need to be addressed with respect to an entrance and access easement being located at the north end of the property. 5. Proffer 3.3 references a signalization agreement, but does not indicate the location for the signal. 6. In Proffer 3.4, in the second sentence I would recommend the Applicant substituting the words "the first" for the words "any final". 0 HALL, MONAHAN, ENGLE, MAHAN & MITCHELL Michael T. Ruddy, AICP July 18, 2008 Page 3 7. In Proffer 3.5, concerning the $350,000.00 cash proffer, it should be noted that the proffer will not be paid until the first Certificate of Occupancy is issued on the Property. Proffers are customarily paid at the time of the issuance of the first building permit (Fs is the proffer for fire and rescue in Proffer 4). 8. In Proffer 4, concerning the proffer for fire and rescue, I would suggest the Applicant use the words "for fire and rescue purposes" in place of the words "to assist in funding fire and rescue operations in the County". 9. With respect to Proffer 5, concerning site landscaping, staff should determine whether the proposed landscaping meets the goals for landscaping in the Route I 1 corridor. 10. In Proffer 5.2, concerning planting of street trees on the west side of the Property adjoining the Interstate 81 right-of-way, staff should determine whether the proposed spacing of the street trees is adequate. It should be noted that I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable and appropriate for the rezoning of this specific property, whether other proffers would be appropriate, as it is my understanding that that review will be done b;r the staff and the Planning Commission. If there are any questions concerning the foregoing comments, please contact me. ery ly yours, Ro e t T. Mitch .1, Jr RTM/glh • • WALSH COLUCCI LUBELEY EMRICH & WALSH PC Michael J. Coughlin (703) 680-4664 Ext. 113 mcoughlin cDpw.thelandlawyers.com Fax: (703) 680-2161 June 19, 2008 Eric Lawrence Fred. Co. Dept. Of Planning & Development North Building, 2"d Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Re: Agency Comments on the BPG Properties, Ltd. Rezoning Application Dear Eric: Below you will find a chart that reflects the agencies we submitted our application materials to, their comments, and the Applicant's response. COMMENTS RESPONSE Fire Marshal: Thank you. Recommend Approval Frederick County Public Schools: Acknowledged. We offer no comments. Frederick County Sanitation Authority: Will provide Acknowledged. sewer & water to this site. Frederick — Winchester Health Department: It is the Applicant's understanIthatNo objection under following conditions. these regulatory requirements to the irrespand 1. All buildings on site are to be served by the public water sewer system as approved by the Frederick County applicable project Proffer Statement, and so thessanitation authority. have not been drafted into the 2. All wells are to be abandoned according to the Private Statement. Well Regulations. 3. All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic hauler and abandoned by filling with sand or gravel. 4. Permits are to be obtained from the health department for any proposal for a motel, hotel, or restaurant. 5. All designs submitted should provide for protection of the Branson Spring from any contaminants or drainage due to the proposed future construction. Also attached 12/14/06 comments. PHONE 7o3 680 4664 1 FAx 703 68o 6o67 1 WWW.'I'HEI,ANDI,AWYERS.COM 4310 PRINCE WILLIAM PARKWAY, SUITE 300 1 PRINCE WILLIAM, VA 22192 ARLINGTON OFFICE 703 528 4700 1 LOUDOUN OFFICE 703 737 3633 ATTORNEYS AT LAW Winchester Regional Airport: Acknowledged. No new comments received. No objection previously. Company 13 — Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept.: Acknowledged. No new comments received. Prior comments: As long as the design as the standard fire codes. Fredericksburg — Winchester Service Authority: Acknowledged. Capacity numbers were previously and are included in No comments but also attached 12/21/06 comments regarding water and sewer capacity numbers. provided the Applicant's Impact Statement. Historic Resources Advisory Board, c/o Eric Laurence: • Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a • This comment was previously Preliminary Information Form (PIC) fi•om the addressed as follows: BPG Department of Historic Resources (HR) form the contracted CCS Mid -Atlantic to Nathaniel Branson House, which is located on the complete and submit a PIF to the property proposed to be rezoned. The PIF will Department of historic Resources. A copy of the report dated May 1, determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can received state recognition for its historical value. 20076 was sent directly to HRAB and DHR. • The HRAB requested that a landscaped berm be placed along the frontage of the property so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across • The Applicant has addressed this Rt. 11) would not be negatively impacted by the comment in Proffer 5. placement of a 739,000 sq. ft. Industrial structure. Frederick County Proffer 3.4 addresses this comment and Department of Parks & Recreation: has been modified to require the Applicant to dedicate an easement to the County for Recommend proffer statement include a 10' trail on an adequate easement which to construct the trail — should meet public purposes in the location of the trail. VDOT & ASHTO guidelines. Robert T. Mitchell, County Attorney: No comments received on the Proffer Statement. Fred. Co. Dept. of Planning & Development, MikeTe est that no further revision to Ruddy: is necessary and that the Proffer 5: While this is consistent with that previot will be able to increase the width proffered, I would suggest you insert the wordndscape "a area, at its discretion, during the site plan process "minimum" in the first sentence before ten (10)10' proffers as drafted. wide landscape strip" to enable the landscaping to be spread out within the minimum 25' area between the With respect to landscaping along the R.O.W and the parking lot. Property's 1-81 frontage, the Applicant has not had sufficient time to evaluate this I would also suggest you consider providing some form request but will offer a response as soon as of landscaping along the properties frontage with possible. 0 0 F erstate 81 in an effort to improve the appearanceng this corridor and help break up the mass of sucharge facility and potential trailer parking area. This ould in no way be as intensive as that which you have proffered along Route 11, but some consideration should be warranted. Frederick County Department of Public Works: No comments received and unable to locate comments from previous submittal. Matthew B. Smith, Staff Engineer Acknowledged. Edinburg Residency Virginia Department of Transportation: The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a significant measurable impact on Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers offered in the BPG Properties/I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. We have the following comments: • The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance with Branson Springs Road in the future will have a positive impact on the overall traffic movement on Route 11. • These proffers provide for the necessary entrance/turn lane improvements at the initial entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of site plan review. • While the Department recognizes that there are traffic impact deficiencies at both the Route 11 and Rest Church Road intersection and Route 11 and Brucetown/Hopewell Road intersection, it appears the best solution is to accept a monetary contribution from the applicant. This would allow Frederick County and VDOT to make future decisions on the appropriate use of these funds. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, 0 including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. John Bishop, Deputy Director — Transportation: Acknowledged. Regarding the Transportation Impact Analysis: With regard to the extension of Branson Spring Road, the Applicant requires It appears to me that your updated TIA addresses my additional information before determining previous concerns regarding background traffic. the impact of a right-of-way reservation or dedication for this extension. Regarding the Application and Proffers: The Applicant is open to discussing this item further, but is concerned that there While it continues to me my position that the ideal entrance will be considerable right-of-way for this site would align with Branson Spring Road, it necessary to accommodate an extension of appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your Branson Spring over I-81 proffers. While. it is generally the preference of staff that physical improvements be put in place as opposed to cash proffers, the right of way issues in this situation and the fact that the greatest needs are on property not controlled by your client make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case. I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in process right now that calls for the extension of Branson Spring Rd across the northern portion of your Client's property. I would ask that your client consider making accommodations for this future roadway. Thank you for your review of these matters. Best regards, WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH & WALSH, P.C. Michael J. Coughlin BPG Properties/I-81 Distrib tion Center - VDOT Comments to Rezoning Page 1 of 1 Coughlin, Michael J. From: Funkhouser, Rhonda [Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov] on behalf of Smith, Matthew, P.E. [Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:10 AM To: Coughlin, Michael J.; jknott@bpgltd.com Cc: Copp, Jerry; Smith, Matthew, P.E.; Hoffman, Gregory; Bishop, John A. Subject: BPG Properties/1-81 Distribution Center - VDOT Comments to Rezoning The documentation within the application to rezone this property appears to have a significant measurable impact on Route 11. This route is the VDOT roadway which has been considered as access to the property referenced. VDOT is satisfied that the revised transportation proffers offered in the BPG Properties/I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Application dated June 19, 2008 addresses transportation concerns associated with this request. We have the following comments: . The opportunity to realign their proposed entrance with Branson Springs Road in the future will have a positive impact on the overall traffic movement on Route 11. . These proffers provide for the necessary entrance/turn lane improvements at the initial entrance in accordance with VDOT requirements at the time of site plan review. . While the Department recognizes that there are traffic impact deficiencies at both the Route 11 and Rest Church Road intersection and Route 11 and Brucetown/Hopewell Road intersection, it appears the best solution is to accept a monetary contribution from the applicant. This would allow Frederick County and VDOT to make future decisions on the appropriate use of these funds. Before development, this office will require a complete set of construction plans detailing entrance designs, drainage features, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip_ Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off -site roadway improvements and drainage. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. This permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to comment. Matthew B. Smith, P.E. Residency Staff Engineer VDOT - Edinburg Residency 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 Phone # (540) 984-5615 Fax # (540) 984-5607 6/19/2008 0 0 Page I of 1 Coughlin, Michael J. From: John Bishop [Jbishop@co.frederick.va.us] Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 11:24 AM To: Coughlin, Michael J. Cc: 'Mike Ruddy'; 'Eric Lawrence'; 'John Bishop' Subject: BPG County Transportation Comment Mr. Coughlin; Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this rezoning application. I have the following comments to offer. Regarding the Transportation Impact Analysis: It appears to me that your updated TIA addresses my previous concerns regarding background traffic. Regarding the Application and Proffers: While it continues to me my position that the ideal entrance for this site would align with Branson Spring Road, it appears that you are attempting to meet this goal with your proffers. While it is generally the preference of staff that physical improvements be put in place as opposed to cash proffers, the right of way issues in this situation and the fact that the greatest needs are on property not controlled by your client make the cash form of proffer appropriate in this case. I would again note that there is a draft transportation plan in process right now that calls for the extension of Branson Spring Rd across the northern portion of your Client's property. I would ask that your client consider making accommodations for this future roadway. Thank You; John A. Bishop, AICP Deputy Director - Transportation Frederick County Planning & Development 107 North Kent St, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 Ph: 540-665-5651 F: 540-665-6395 jbishop@co.frederick.va.us 6/19/2008 From:LIFESAFE Off !008 09:20 #121 P.001/001 , ' Y 1S I'xt7a Ft t ;t Ir Control number Date received Date reviewed Date Revised RZ 0 B - 00 0 6 5/30/2008 6/2/2008 Project Name Applicant 1-81 Distribution Center BPG Properties, Ltd. Address City State Zip Applicant Phone 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William VA 22192 703-680-4664 Type Application Tax ID Number Fire District Rescue District Rezoning 33-A-110,33-A-10 13 13 Current Zoning Election District RA Recommendations Stonewall Automatic Sprinkler System Automatic Fire Alarm System Residential Sprinkler System No No No Other recommendation Emergency Vehicle Access Hydrant Location Fire Lane Required Not Identified Not Identified No Siamese Location Roadway/Aisleway Width Special Hazards Not Identified Not Identified No Emergency Vehicle Access Comments Access Comments Additional Comments Plan Approval Recommended Reviewed By Signature Yes J. Neal .,-- Title !l Rezoning Comment Fire and Rescue Company Comments on rezonings will be needed from the fire and rescue company serving the location in question. Please fill in the attached comment sheet with the name of the fire and rescue squad serving the location and obtain the cormnent from that squad. A list of the County Fire and Rescue Company follows the comment sheet. Fire and Rescue Company Name of Fire & Rescue Company: Address & Phone Company 13 - Clearbrook Vol. Fire Dept. 1256 Brucetown Road Clearbrook, VA 22624 (540) 722-2073 Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575-2352 Mailing Address: C/O Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M-1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770+/- F y-� Firetandesaue Company?SfiG'omm�ents, sy t x es , > 1 5 ? -` k'{a , _� �. 2 +. t» . 'ii��Lll�. ? 3t S Y 4 FT t )y Y\ tlF S- 1t R x 5 j ,ek ? # -L+'r y ✓ \i'x S .; '.c > {xt i`+ ! F N 1 Tk ra { .;i 4�.,° 1 tit f �) ➢'l,t+ q F 1 Y F ?}-ry t ;tct - i i <� ;r 5 �2 t {! t x}::. t k1,,t f{r {,.,. ri M1� }i iFxt 3 }�T +:. rs � tt FXre &FZesVue Coznnpan�'i � x � AT` INuLice €u Fire " t:escue Uompany - Flease Heturn This Form to the Applicant 31 0' r Rezoning Comments Frederick County Sanitation Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Sanitation Authority Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer Attn: Engineer P.O. Box 1877 315 Tasker Road Winchester, Virginia 22604 Stephens City, Virginia (540) 868-1061 Applicant Please fill out the information; as accurately. as possible in order to assist the Sanitation Authority with tlae�r review Attach a copy of youii appl�cataon fox m,ocatioi� tap, proffer,statement;'iiupact � nalys s, aid auy other pe tmen 'information Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: B-3 Ind. and Transition Acreage: 59.0770+, Sanitation Authof t Co y mments t �W All S�nitatron4Authonty S1gn�tute & Da% � ,,�.,,, � � r h 3 Notice to Sanitation Authority - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 25 Rezoning Comments Frederick -Winchester Service Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Fred-Winc Service Authority Fred-Winc Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director Attn: Jesse W. Moffett P.O. Box 43 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22604 Winchester, Virginia (540) 722-3579 Jl U1Gll1 Vl UGl W UD.71Jtr L11G' y of,your application form,466atiou'map Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:B-3 Ind. and TransitionAcreage: 59.0770+/- Notice to Fred-Winc Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant 0 Rezoning Comments Frederick -Winchester Service Authority Mail to: Hand deliver to: Fred -Wine Service Authority Fred -Wine Service Authority Attn: Jesse W. Moffett, Executive Director Attn: Jesse W. Moffett P.O. Box 43 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22604 Winchester, Virginia (540) 722-3579 Applicant Please fill otit the information as accurately as possible ui ordez to assist the Fred Wine Service Authoniy'with their review Attach a copy of your application form, location map, pi offer statement, mpacfianalysis, and any other per hnept information Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575-2436 Mailing Address: C/O Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 - Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M-1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770+/- Notice to Fred -Wine Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant 32 M Rezoning Comments Frederick -Winchester Health Department Mail to Frederick -Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street h' Winchester, Virginia 22601 (540) 722-3480 Hand deliver to: Frederick- Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer 107 North Kent Street Suite 201 Winchester, Virginia A plica ity Please 11;orit the,7nforinatio}i1ss'accurately as possible ni;ordc to assist the 4 rro;doric�to �Vm�Iiesterrl)zealtli De,�azh�neht;unth their review � Attach a�cdpy of �oi�r E �ppl><cationforna,=laa�tiou$map, pi olte`� jstateuent, iml�acfi� analysis, andi any'othei pertznen Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22912 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: B-3 Ind. and Transiti*creage: 59.0770+/- Frederick Wmch�ster�lealth Department's Comments `� °�` i a � y e a f i u � F a Z 3 f q U 4 �q, '-<," S`' < �,; rya 'F ' x( f. a 3:nE ?`•k a s E_3 i£�'asxit a i �E u- �� i n; F xAl ,.a;.>. �r E HealhD'ept� Sign61 ature&Date �' .i, k 1 �nS 4. { , i --„ f 'orb• } "`is§*�". a 3 Notice to Health Department - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 26 Lord Fatfax Environmental HLlth District 107 N. Kent St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 lR, (540) 722-3480 FAX (540) 722-3479 Counties of Clarke, Frederick, Page, Shenandoah, Warren, and City of Winchester To: Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22912 From: Doug Dailey, Environmental Health Specialist Senior Date: June 11, 2008 Subject: B-3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33-A-110 and 33-A-109 The health department has no objection under the following conditions: 1) All buildings on site are to be served by the public water and sewer system as approved by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. 2) All wells are to be abandoned according the Private Well Regulations 3) All septic tanks are to be pumped by an approved septic hauler and abandoned by filling with sand or gravel. 4) Permits are to be obtained from the health department for any proposal for a motel, hotel, or restaurant. 5) All designs submitted should provide for protection of the Branson Spring from any contaminants or drainage due to the proposed future construction. • 0 June 2, 2008 Triad Engineering, Inc. Attn: Dennie D. Dunlap, P.E. PO Box 2397. Winchester, VA 22604 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 RE: Request for Confirmatio❑ of Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments 1-81 Distribution Center; PINTS# 33-A-104, 110 Dear Mr. Dunlap: The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) considered the above referenced rezoning proposal during their meeting on January 16, 2007. The HRAB reviewed information associated with the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report and the Virginia Department of Historic Resources, as well as information provided by the applicant. At that time, the HRAB felt that the proffers associated with historic preservation and recognition was adequate, but made two recommendations which included: Since the last time a survey was done in 1990, the HRAB felt that the applicant must fill out a Preliminary Information Form (PIF) from the Department of Historic Resources (DI-IR) for the Nathaniel Branson House, which is located on the property proposed to be rezoned. The PIF will determine if the Nathaniel Branson House can receive state recognition for its historical value. The HRAB requested that a landscaped bean be placed along the frontage of the property so that the viewshed of the Alexander Branson House (across Rt. 11) would not be negatively impacted by the placement of a 739,000 sq. ft. industrial structure. These comments, which were issued to the applicant in a letter dated January 24, 2007, remain valid. Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, Amber Powers Planning Technician ALP/bad cc: Charles S. DeHaven, Stonewall Supervisor Rhoda Kriz, HRAB Chairman 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Rezoning Comments Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation Department of Parks & Recreation 107 North Kent Street County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor Winchester, Virginia 22601 107 North Kent Street (540) 665-5678 Winchester, Virginia Applicant Please fill out the Ynfoi7nation'as accurately as pos'sihle n1 order,to assist the Deparhient of Paiks& Recreation with their review Attach a copy of your application ,tot ni, locahou map, proffer stateiuenf; impact;an�tlysxs, anti any other pertinent information Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:6-3 Industrial/TranisiticAcreage: 59.0770+/- Notice to Department of Parks & Recreation - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 23 Rezoning Comments Superintendent of Frederick County Public Schools Mail to: Hand deliver to: Frederick County Public Schools Frederick County Public Schools Attn: Superintendent Attn: Superintendent P.O. Box 3508 School Administration Building Winchester, Virginia 22604 1415 Amherst Street (540) 662-3888 Winchester, Virginia Applxcaait Please -11 out the infoiza�atxoi as acciiately as passible �n oxdei' to assist the Superlxtendeut of Public Schools with his revze Attach a copy of'.your. application foa m, Tocation.map profferstatement,`ainpact analysis, and, au��other?-�iertiuent mformatiion , Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:133 Industrial/TransitiAcreage: 59.0770+/- Notice to School Superintendent - Please Return This Form to the Applicant 24 06-19-08;11:44AM; ;5406622936 # 2/ 3 Rezoning Comments Winchester Regional Airport Mail to: Band deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director Attu: Executive Director 491 Airport Road 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) (540) 662-2422 Winchester, Virginia ..,pp fill out'tlie uifortnatlon\as accurately as possible�n oi�.ei �to assist Winchester Regional:Airpgrt with then review; A Lt`aeh a copy of your applicaon form? loca�ori:map,;proffer sfiatemeiat; nnp�ict a{nalysis,,and,any other pertinent ufornnation „. :,; � Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575-2436 Mailing Address: C/D Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation brive Winchester, VA 22602 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M-1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770+/- WznchesterReg�onal Airport's Comments z WYnc�hes#er�.tegrobalAuport'S t ,� {J r + 3 } ] � ! `Signature,&r7Date Q A e /1/�( i (1R 1 1 Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - Please Return Form to Applicant 30 06-19-08;11:44AM; • 0 ;5406622936 # 3/ 3 i WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD. WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 (540) 662-2422 December 15, 2006 ' Dennie D. Dunlap, P.E. Triad Engineering, Incorporated Post Office Box 2397 Winchester, Virginia 22604 Re: Rezoning Comment i-81 Distribution Centel - Stonewall Magisterial District Dear Mr. Dunlap: We have reviewed the proposed Rezoning application and determined that the proposed development plan will not have an impact on operations at the Winchester Regional Airport. While the proposed site lies within the airport's airspace, it does fall outside of the airport's Part 77 close in surfaces therefore special conditions will not be requested. Thank you for your continued cooperation and consideration in the continuing safe operations of the Winchester Regional Airport. Sincerely, Serena R. Manuel Executive Director 06-19-08;11:44AM; ;5406622936 # 1/ 3 Rezoning Comments Winchester RegionaU'Airport Mail to: Hand deliver to: Winchester Regional Airport Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (Rt. 645, off of Rt. 522 South) (540) 662-2422 Winchester, Virginia Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (703) 680-4664 Mailing Address: c/o Michael J. Coughlin Walsh Colucci Lubeley Emrich & Walsh 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Prince William, VA 22192 Location of property: Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of Route 11 intersection with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike). Current zoning: RA Zoning requested:B-3 Ind. and TransitioAcreage: 59.0770+/- �:E�1]4C11eSteriRegY0�na1 Ayrpoxf's CO]1,13neT�fS� ,. �' ' �1 �t41 Z � I r I isl5r P�k� > � a c r � _ •., ......L:... + ... _ �'a':;t�:h[ 3 9 mOsum�gr.. I' _ .A.__._�..,�Si.� ar, c'[ r-....._. .................. i 1 I . I. ,cam_. _ . 4.fj ,. - ,. .,.-.................. :l. 1 :c F R F Fu"i _••-1cr:: s• P • %F5 s: L....:_:i: ::-r•. r. n1 ...., .. ....._i...._. �...,... - .,.... ...>L,.....,4 - t 7 .1 a t :u.r:!!aS,� 3m y........••,:r...,..._J,... . 1. ItJY:?5 - - _ .r;. :. r..:. ! - .......... • , p'� it {--'I ! :. - ..... .. `. -!tTiriinF!:;:asxi-_:� .. r - s >? F'te _1{r s axl of a o...:....::.:. MOW Fil t ilt tp /�. r r Mv r t a R✓ l V naheste eglo�al A PRoxk-s 7: ' ,1 { , SignatU�e &Datet r s—� 11g i t r is +la Notice to Winchester Regional Airport - PIease Return Form to Applicant 30 AGENCY COMMENTS Patton Harris Rusla Associates Engineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. PHP 10212 Governor Lane Blvd, Suite 1007 Williamsport, n01.Maryland 21795 Phone:301.226 31 Memorandum Fax: 301.223.6631 To: Matt Smith Organization/Company: Virginia Department of Transportation From: Michael Glickman, PE Date: June 11, 2008 A Sy4plemental Analysis to: An Addendum to: A Traic Wacl Project Name/Subject: Anal e� is of I-81 Distribution Center PHR+A Project Number: 14596-1-0 Per your request, Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) has prepared this document to provide supplemental analysis to the memorandum titled: An Addendum to: A Tra,�c Impact Analysis of I-81 Distribution Center, dated February 22, 2008, by PHR+A. The proposed I-81 Distribution Center will be located along the west side of Route 11, south of Rest Church Road, in Frederick County, Virginia. The purpose of this document is to provide revised analyses assuming via single site - driveway in lieu of the two site -driveways shown in the February 22, 2008 report. The proposed driveway is to be located along the west side of Route 11, opposite Branson Spring Road. PHR+A recently conducted weekday AM/PM peak hour turning movement counts at the intersection of Route 11 /Branson Spring Road. This document presents the revised traffic analyses at the intersection of Route 11 /Branson Spring Road/Site-driveway during 2010 build -out conditions. All methodology as well as all other study area intersection results remain consistent with the aforementioned memorandum titled: An Addendum to: A Traoc & actAnalysis of I-81 Distribution Center, dated February 22, 2008, by PHR+A. Figure 1 below shows the 2010 build -out traffic conditions peak hour volumes and ADT as well as 2010 build -out lane geometry and levels of service at the intersection of Route ll/Branson Spring Road/Site-driveway. J U N 1 3 2008 Page 1 of 2 Patton Harris Ru.& Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 2 of 2 2010 Build -out Volumes No Scale 11 b M b Site ,dtivelva 1[ %`60)) *1140 9(6) (I ( )o44 ff Branson S (72)19� �ir )71'Ina (load �N q AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 1 2010 Build -out LOS u Signalized Intersection �� Overall � LOS=A(C) Site-dri vewa C(B) �C)C Branson S pr'ng Road AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) nT TP+n Figure 1 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions & LOS @ Route 11 & Site -driveway Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects APPENDIX SYNCHRO Worksheets 1-81 Distribution Center • • 2010 Build -out onditions_AM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Lane Configurations c Volume (vph) 44 0 19 9 0 6 85 494 7 5 776 199 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.960 0.944 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.966 0.971 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1707 0 1770 1859 0 0 1863 1583 At Permitted 0.781 0.816 0.273 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1397 0 0 1435 0 509 1859 0 0 1857 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 21 7 3 221 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 753 8030 5500 Travel Time (s) 15.6 17.1 182.5 125.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 0 21 10 0 7 94 549 8 6 862 221 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 70 0 0 17 0 94 557 0 0 868 221 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 �� �� �� 1'81 Distribution Center �� �~ 2010 Build -out ODditi0OS_/\M 24 Site-drivewaySite-driveway & Route 11 8/11/2008 � Switch Phase Minimum Initial kd 8.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 Minimum Split kA 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 1/.0 140 00 1/0 140 0.0 66.0 66.0 0.0 86.0 66.0 88.0 Total Split (%) 17.5% 17.5% 0.0% 17.5% 17.5% 0.0% 82.5% 82,5% 0.096 82.5% 82.5% 82.5% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 60.0 60.0 80.0 60.0 80.0 Yellow Time kd 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.O 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (o) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust bA 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time kA 8.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Loed'LogOpUmizn? Vehicle Extension (o) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Roou| Mode None None None None C'NUn C'NUn C'NUn C-Min C'NUn Act EffctGreen bA 8.0 8.6 63.0 83.0 83.0 83.0 Actuated g/CRatio 0]1 011 0.79 0.79 070 0.79 wtRaUo 0.42 0.11 0.23 0.38 0.59 0.17 Control Delay 32.0 251 5.5 4.7 72 0.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 32.0 25.1 5.5 47 7.2 0.0 LOS C C A A A A Approach Delay 32.0 251 4.8 5.8 AppmoohLOS C C A A 00th %i|oGreen (n) 122 12.2 12.2 12.2 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 00th %i|aTonn Coda Gap Gap Hold Hold Conrd Coord Coord Coovd Cnnrd 70th %i|oGreen (o) 0.8 0.8 0.8 8.8 582 582 58.2 58.2 582 70th %ileTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Conrd Coord Comd SOth %i|eGmon (x) 82 8.2 82 82 50.8 60.8 58.8 59.8 59.8 50th %i|eTonn Coda Gap Gap Hold Hold Coond Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %i|oGreen (o) 6.8 8.8 8.8 6.6 61.4 81.4 61.4 61.4 61.4 3Oth96ileTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Cnurd Coord Coord Coord Cnord 10th %i|o6mon (o) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 1Oth %i|eTerm Code Skip Skip Skip Skip Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 6Oth0d 23 5 11 78 161 O Queue LongthQ5th (f0 50 22 36 153 323 17 Internal Link Dist (M) 806 873 7950 5420 Turn Bay Length (f0 150 Base Cepaoity(vph) 180 172 400 1494 1492 1316 Starvation Cap Roduotn O O O O O O SpiUbaokCap Roduotn O 0 O 0 O O Storage Cap Roduotn O O O O O O Reduced v/nRatio 0.39 0.10 023 0.37 0.68 0.17 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: O(O%),Referenced bophase 2:NBTLand 8:SBTLStart ofGreen Natural Cycle: 50 Patton Harris Rust &A0000ateo Synohm7' Report Page 1-81 Distribution Center • 2010 Build -out onditions_AM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 o2 o4 66s 14s 06 08 66s 14s Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 1-81 Distribution Center • *2010 Build -out Condiitons_PM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Lane GrotipNBL°-,%SBL ? `;SB,T,,,, SBR Lane Configurations 4+ 4+ T *T Volume (vph) 168 0 72 6 0 5 24 929 11 2 633 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.960 0.938 0.998 0.850 At Protected 0.966 0.974 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1702 0 1770 1859 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.784 0.833 0.282 0.996 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1402 0 0 1455 0 525 1859 0 0 1855 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 37 6 1 62 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 802 7981 5500 Travel Time (s) 15.6 18.2 181.4 125.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 187 0 80 7 0 6 27 1032 12 2 703 62 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 267 0 0 13 0 27 1044 0 0 705 62 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 1'81 Distribution Center �� �� *2010 BUild'OUt[|OndiitOOG PM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 8/11/2008 � ~�r �� r � � � , � � � � --.»` Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 8.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 6.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 6.0 Minimum Split kA 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 11O Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 0.0 44.0 44.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split MQ 65.0% 55.0% 0.0% 55.0% 55.0% 0.0% 45.0% 45.0% 0.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green hA 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time kd 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.O 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust kd 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 4.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Laad'LegOyUmizo? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C'Min C'Min C'Min C'Min C'Min Act EffctGreen (s) 18.3 18.3 48.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 Actuated g/CRoUo 0.24 0.24 0.81 0.81 0.81 0.81 wtRaUo 0.73 0.04 0.08 0.02 0.62 0.06 Control Delay 34.8 15.0 0.9 31.8 14.8 31 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 KO 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.8 15.0 8.9 31.8 14.8 3.1 LOS C 8 A C B A Approach Delay 34.6 15.0 31.3 13.8 AppmachLOS C 8 C B 00th %i|eGreen (o) 281 281 281 281 38.8 39.9 39.9 30.0 38.0 0Nh%ileTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Comrd Comd Qmrd Comd Comd 70th %i|oGmon (o) 22.0 22.9 22.9 22.9 451 451 45.1 461 451 70th %UoTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %i|nGreen (s) 193 19.3 19.3 19.3 487 487 48.7 487 48.7 50th %ileTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Dmrd Comd Qmrd Comd Omrd 30th %i|oGman (o) 157 157 15J 157 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 30th %UoTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Comd Omrd Comd Comrd Comd 10th %i|eGmen (o) 10.7 10.7 10.7 107 67.3 57.3 57.3 57.3 57.3 10b%ileTerm Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Omrd Coord Comrd Comd Qmrd Queue Length 6Oth0D 106 3 5 419 200 O Queue Length 05th(fU 181 14 21 #851 413 18 Internal Link Dist 00 606 722 7801 5420 Turn Bay Length U0 150 Base Capacity (vph) 685 804 319 1131 1128 087 Starvation Cap Roduotn O O O 0 O O SpiUbaokCap Roduotn O 0 O O O O Storage Cap Roduotn O O O 0 O 0 Reduced wtRatio 0.30 0.02 0.08 0.92 0.63 0.06 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: O(O%),Referenced bophase 2:NBTLand 8:SBTL.Start ofGreen Natural Cycle: 70 Patton Harris Rust &Aoxocioteo Synohm7' Report 1-81 Distribution Center 0 •2010 Build -out Condiitons_PM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay, 25.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 78,2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 o2 o4 36 s 44 s 06 08 36 s 44 s Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 0 Patton Harris End neers. Surveyors. P R+A H Rust & Associates Planners. Landscape Architects. 10212 Governor Lane Blvd, Suite 1007 Williamsport, Maryland 21795 Phone: 301.223.4010 Fax: 301.223.6831 To: Organization/Company: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project Number: Memorandum Board of Supervisors Frederick County, Virginia Michael Glickman, PE February 22, 2008 An Addendum to: A Traffic IWact Analysis of I-81 Distribution Center 14596-1-0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) has prepared this memorandum as an addendum to the proposed I-81 Distribution Center located along the west side of Route 11, south of Rest Church Road, in Frederick County, Virginia. In accordance with Frederick County comments relating to the PHR+A traffic impact study titled: A Tra(ric Impact Anal ,ry is of I-81 Distribution Center; dated May 30, 2007, this document presents revised traffic analyses to reflect modifications in background and proposed development trip generation. Accordingly, PHR+A has revised the background and build -out conditions analyses to include: The recently approved Rutherford Crossing development as a Background Development with the revised and approved TIA counts (see page 2); • Use of ITE Code 150, for square footage calculation of trip generation; Limitation of development potential to 750,000 square feet of development using ITE Code 150. Office uses will be ancillary to the primary use, and is accommodated by ITE Code 150; This report constitutes a Worst Case Scenario analysis. All methodology remains consistent with the aforementioned May 30, 2007 study. PHR+A has provided analyses for 2010 background and build -out conditions. 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Using the 74.,,Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trig Generation Repo�y, PHR+A has provided Table 1 to summarize the 2010 "other developments" trip generation. Figure 1 shows the 2010 background developments AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes and ADT (Average Daily Trips) at each of the study area intersections. Figure 2 shows the corresponding background lane geometry and AM/PM peals hour levels of service. All Synchro levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this memorandum. Page 1 of 9 E • Patton Harris Rust & Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 2of9 Table 1 2010 Background Developments Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount In AM Peak Hour Out Total In PM Peak Hour Out Total ADT Sempeles Property (Partial Build -out) 130 Industrial Park 598,950 SF 336 74 409 106 398 503 3,719 820 Retail 49,000 SF 62 40 102 188 203 391 4,271 Total 398 113 511 293 601 894 7,990 Clearbrook Properties (Full Build -out) 120 GA Heavy Industrial 120,000 SF 54 7 61 3 20 23 180 932 H-T Restaurant 8,000 SF 48 44 92 53 34 87 1,017 Total 102 52 153 56 54 110 1,197 Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park (Full Build -out) 130 Industrial Park 215,000 SF 152 33 186 44 164 208 1,814 862 Home hnpr. Superstore 117,000 SF 76 65 140 135 152 287 3,581 815 Discount Store 127,000 SF 73 34 107 321 321 643 7,115 814 Specialty Retail 187,147 SF 139 89 228 207 264 471 8,044 932 H-T Restaurant 5,000 SF 30 28 58 33 21 55 636 934 Fast Food w/ DT 4,500 SF 122 117 239 81 75 156 2,233 932 H-T Restaurant 4,800 SF 29 27 55 32 20 52 610 932 H-T Restaurant 5,500 SF 33 30 63 37 23 60 699 932 H-T Restaurant 7,200 SF 43 40 83 48 31 79 915 912 Drive-in Bank 4,100 SF 28 22 51 94 94 188 1,004 Total 725 485 1,210 1,031 1,165 2,197 26,652 North Stephenson Tract OMPS Property (Full Build -out) 110 Light Industrial 800,000 SF 752 103 855 118 863 981 5,874 Total 752 103 855 118 863 981 5,874 Stephenson Village (Partial Build -out) 210 Single -Family Detached 429 units 77 232 310 255 144 399 4,290 220 Apartment 240 units 20 103 123 100 49 149 1,573 230 Townhouse/Condo 390 units 26 125 150 127 62 189 3,393 251 Elderly Housing - Detach 266 units 29 51 80 78 44 123 1,064 253 Elderly Housing - Attach 72 units 3 2 5 4 3 7 251 Total 155 513 667 564 302 866 10,570 Other Developments 730 FEMA 350 employees 190 24 214 86 191 277 2,713 812 Building/Lumber Store 15,000 SF 26 13 39 33 37 70 639 Total 216 37 253 119 228 347 3,352 Total of all DevelopmentsDevelopmentsl 2,347 1,302 3,649 2181 3,213 5,394 55,635 Engineers 9 Surveyors 9 Planners 9 Landscape Architects Patton Harris Rust & Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 3 of 9 Figure 1 2010 Background Traffic Conditions Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates 46 Memorandum To: VDOT Page 4of9 a e �G) 0 t G7 Signalized p Intersection O B(n) LOS=B(B) No Scale (10M �► Signalized "Suggested C . Signalized O Mm �► ��Q� Intersection Improvements" Intersection LOS=B(Q Signalizatio❑ LOS=B(B) �1 � Rest Church F Road fA)A 1r Signalized New Inrsection a. Intersection wBte - 4th Leg LOS=B(Q EB - 1 Left G 0� Cn 1� Ca)) Site Drive #% ] (b)C`� s SITE � G4Q��� 3it_ 11 U Drive X. 2 Unsignalized Intersection Signalized Suggested 0 Intersection Improvements" (n LOS=QQ Signalization EB - 1 Right wB - 1 Right 11 Alignment of Hopewell R Brucetown Rd Ho ewell Road T�_p rucetown Road Unsignalized 0 Intersection (A)q �4 Intersection G� �Q\, BtUcet01, o� AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement D-F- A Denotes two-way left turn lane Figure 2 2010 Background Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers 9 Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 0 • Patton Harris Rust & Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 5 of 9 TRIP GENERATION Using the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trio Generation Retort, PHR+A has prepared Table 2 to summarize the revised trip generation associated the proposed I- 81 Distribution Center. Table 2 Proposed Development: I-81 Distribution Center Trin Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount AM Peak Hour In Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total ADT 150 Warehousing 750,000 SF 285 63 347 80 240 320 3,110 Total 1 285 63 347 1 80 240 320 1 3110 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT The distribution of trips remains consistent with the May 30, 2007 report. Figure 3 shows the development -generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments at each of the study area intersections. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The I-81 Distribution Center assigned trips (Figure 3) were added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 1) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 4 shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at each of the study area intersections. Figure 5 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All Synchro levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this memorandum. Engineers 9 Surveyors 9 Planners 9 Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 6 of 9 Note: Alignment of Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) A is assumed. Figure 3 Development -Generated Trip Assignments Engineers • Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Patton Harris Rust & Associates Figure 4 Memorandum Page 7 of 9 Note: Alignment of Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) I A is assumed. 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates • Memorandum To: VDOT Page 8 of 9 Signalized Intersection Cj �� LOS=C V O Signalized O Intersection m LOS=B(B) y,` No Scale (73jB Q(C) O �Q Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" Rest Chu rch Road Signalized "New Intersection" LOS=B(B) Signalizalion Intersection �VB - 4th Leg LOS=B(C) EB - 1 Lett a ,F 11 Right in / 4 �`p Right out p A Unsignalized 11 Intersection (D)C � C N U 11 �- Site Drive # 1 e A SITE Site Q 11 Drive ##2 4ignalized r� Intersection LOS=A(B) Unsignalized Intersection OG oa 11 no "well Road Signalized "Suggested Intersection Improvements" Ea Bruce LOS=C(C) Signalization EB - 1 Left + 1 Right Unsignalized p Intersection town Road wB - I Right Alignment of Hopewell Rd Brucetown Rd U Unsignalized Intersection U� IL�C(C) ,`// 7 rucetoiyn oa Fir) C1 AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) IJT T1�+A 11` * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement Denotes two-way left turn lane Figure 5 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service Engineers • Surveyors 9 Planners • Landscape Architects • Patton Harris Rust & Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 9 of 9 CONCLUSION Based upon the Synchro analysis results, all suggested improvements are a direct result of Background Traffic Conditions, with the exception of a single eastbound left turn lane on Brucetown Road (and the site -related improvements). The Development Generated Impact to study area intersections is minimal. The reconstruction and alignment of the Hopewell/Brucetown/Route 11 intersection is an important road improvement for the corridor, because it is the only intersection in which failing movements can be identified over time. All the study area intersections will maintain the county -requested level of service `rC" or better during 2010 build -out conditions. Background Developments should be required to resolve the impacts generated by their respective projects. Table 3 summarizes the improvements required during 2010 build -out conditions per the revised analysis as well as per the May 30, 2007 study. Table 3 I-81 Distribution Center Comparison of Improvements Required 201 fl Rnild-nnf TrafTir Cnndifinnc Improvements required to maintain overall LOS "C" or better No. Intersection Direction hlay 30, 2007 Analysis Revised 2008 Analysis Scenario A Scenario IS Eastbound I Rest Church Road Westbound - No Improvements - No Improvements - No Improvements and 1-81 SB romp Northbound Southbound Eastbound 2 Rest Church Road Westbound No improvements - No Improvements - No Improvements and 1-81 NB romp Northbound Southbound Eastbound - 1 left -turn lane - 1 Icft-tum lane* - I left -turn lane' Route I I and Rest Westbound - Fourth Leg* - Fourth Leg' - Fourth Lcg' 3 Church Road Northbound - - - Southbound - Eestbound 4 Route I I and Site- Westbound - New Intersection (Unsignalired - right-in/right-out) - New Intersection (Unsignalired - right-intright-out) - New Intersection (Unsignalired - right-in/right-out) Drive#I Northbound Southbound Eastbound 5 Route 11 & Site- Westbound - New Intersection Signalization - New Intersection (Unsignalired) - New Intersection Signalization Drive #2 Northbound Southbound Route 11 and Eastbound - l right-tum Ianc' & 1 Ica -turn lane - I left -rum lane* & 1 right-lum Ianc- - 1 left -hum Ianc• & I right -turn lane* 6 opewell Westbound - I right -turn lane' Signalization• - 1 right -turn Ianc' Signalization• - 1 right-lum Ianc' Signalization• RoadH/Bmcetown Northbound - & Alignment* - I right -turn lane* & Alignment' - I right-tum lane* & Alignment' Road Southbound - - I right -turn Inc* - I right -turn Ianc" Eastbound 7 Hopewell Road Westbound - No Improvements - No Improvements - No Improvements and 1-81 NB ramp Northbound Southbound Eastbound - 8 Hopewell Road Westbound - Signalization+ - N o Improvements - No Improvements and I-81 SB mmp Northbound - Southbound - • Improvements required during 2010 Background Conditions Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 9 Landscape Architects • :-:'i-i'on Harris Rui& Associates (:rigineers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Architects. 10212 Governor Lane Blvd., Suite 1007 Williamsport, MD 21795 T 800.616.8286 T 301.223.4010 F 301.223.6831 To: Organization/Company: From: Date: Project Name/Subject: Lloyd Ingram VDOT Michael Glickman, P. E. Memorandum May 30, 2007 Response to March 222, 2007 VDOT comments regarding the report tided: A Traffic LMact �4nalvsis of the I-81 Distribution Center, dated December 1. 2006. =R+A Project file Number: 14596-1-0 cc: Tern- Short iur request, PHR+A (Patton Harris Rust & Associates) has prepared this memorandum to provide _:uses to the March 22, 2007 VDOT comments regarding the report titled: A Traffic Im7bact Analysis ofi be 1-8/ Distribution Center, dated December 1, 2006: !`0T Comment #1: The applicant used the number of employees for the trip generation, which d one employee per 5000 square feet. There is no basis for this asserrion, and therefore feel that this -aml flaw. The study should use the ITE trip rate based on square footage of the proposed facility. HR+A Response: PHR+A performed a trip generation srudv bossed upon three (33) comparable uses: 1) Home Depot Distribution Center (7150,000 square feet)-, 2) Orgrdl, Inc Distribution Center Jn,('00 square feet) and 3) Target Distribution Center (1,300,0Q) square feet). The results of this study (that was submitted to VDOT on April 20, 2007) revealed lower Alai and PM peak hour trip generation volumes than those shown in the December 1, 2006 traffic study. However, based upon discussion between VDOT/County/PHR+A/BPG (Client) at the Apu124, 2007 \ DOT/Engineers meeting in Edinburg, Virginia, a second scenario will be contemplated that assumes the worst -case Office (ITE Code 710) use of 220,000 square feet which equals/exceeds the peak hour volumes based upon 750,000 square feet of Warehousing (ITE Code 150) using the aforementioned square footage rate. sOT Comment #2: Referencing Figure 2, Page 3, please explain why existing traffic volumes in this `igure does not match the traffic counts in the appendix. PHR+A Response: The existing traffic volumes shown in the Figure 2 are greater than the traffic counts due to the balancing of traffic volumes between intersections. CI Patton Harris Rust & A' ciates Memorandum Page 2 VDOT Comment #3: Referencing Figure 2, Page 3, please explain why the Average Daily Trips (ADT's) in this future are consistently higher dze 2005 AADTs, based on VDOT traffic counts. PHR+A Response: The Average Daily Trips shown in Figure 2 are based upon the 2006 PHR+A peak hour traffic counts and "k" factor of 9.2° o. PHR+A calculated "k" factor from 24-hour tube counts. VDOT Comment #4: Referencing Table 1, Page 5, it states "Sempeles Property" and Stephenson -Village" will be partial built -out by 2010. Please explain ghat "partial" means related to the amount of traffic to be generated during background conditions for the subject applicaton_ PHR+A Response: The full build -out of the developments of Sempeles Prope_rt and Stephenson «la.ge will be Year 2012 and Year 2015, respeCvely. The sr-u& scope of the I R1 distriburion Center is limited to Year 2010. Therefore, PHR+A has assumed the Phase 1 completion of Stephenson Village and 50% completion of the Sempeles. VDOT Comment #5: Please provide detailed information about background conditions traffic distribution. PHR+A Response: PHR+A will provide Figures showing trip assignments for each background development in the revised TIA. VDOT Comment #6: The Rest Church Road/I-81 NB Ramps lane configuration in the HCS report does not match Figure 3. Please explain. PHR+A Response: The HCS file contained an input inaccuracy_ Revissmig the HCS files, per the Figure 3 lane geometry at the intersection of Rest Church Road/I-81 NB Ramps, does not result m a -change to movement/approach/overall LOS. VDOT Comment #7: Please provide complete HCS Report for Background Conditions and 2010 Built - Out conditions. PHR+A Response: Complete HCS report will be proVided in the revised TIA. VDOT Comment #8: Referencing Figure 6, Page 9, the applicant has assumed 40% traffic coming from I-81N and another 40% form I-81S. Please explain why half of the vehicles from I-81N use exit 321 and the other half use exit 323. PHR+A Response: The proposed site is located approximately equidistant between Exit 321 and Exit 323 along the east side of I-81. For conservative purposes, PHR+A assumed vehicles from I- 81N and I-81S would utilize both exits to access the property. Engineers a Surveyors • Planners o Landscape Architects A Traffic Irnpact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center (Fonnerly the Clearbrook Distribution Center) Located in: Frederick County, Virginia Prepared for. Berwind Property Group, Ltd.. 1500 Market Street 3000 Center Square Street Philadelphia, PA 19102 Prepared by - Patton Harris Rust & Assorciates, .p_c Engneers. Surveyors. Planners. Landscape Arc :sects. 10212 Governor Lane Blvd, Suite 1007 P"R+AT Williamsport, Maryland 21795 301 .223.4010 I I F 30 1 .223.6831 May 30, 2007 (Revised from December 1, 2006 submission) 0 OVERVIEW Report Summary Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) has prepared this document to present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed I-81 Distribution Center (formerly submitted as the Clearbrook Distribution Center) located along the north side of Hopewell Road, west of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike), in Frederick County, Virginia_ PHR+A has provided analysis for two (2) alternate build -out conditions. Scenario A assumes that the proposed project will include 750,000 square feet of Warehouse. Scenario B assumes the proposed development of 220,000 square feet of office. Access to the site will be provided via two (2) site -driveways along the west side of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike); the northern entrance is to be "right-in/right-out" only. The project is to be built -out over a single transportation phase by the year 2010. Figure 1 is provided to illustrate the location of the proposed I-81 Distribution Center with respect to the surrotmdi-n- roads network - Methodology The traffic impacts accompanying the I-81 Distribution Center were obtained through the following sequence of activities: • Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the study area, • Calculation of trip generation for the proposed I-81 Distribution Center, • Distribution and assignment of the I-81 Distribution Center development -generated trips onto the completed roadway network, • Analysis of capacity and level of service using the iatest version of the highway capacity software, HCS+, for existing and future conditions_ A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center PH+ Project Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007I Page EXISTING CONDITIONS PHR+A conducted AM and PM peals hour manual tunung movement counts at the intersection of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike)/Hopewell RoadBrucetown Road, Hopewell Road/ I-81 northbound ramps, Hopewell Road/ I-81 southbound ramps, Route 11/ Rest Church Road (Route 669), Rest Church Road/ I-81 northbound ramps and Rest Church Road/ I-81 southbound ramps. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of the study area roadway links using a "k" factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 9.2 % based on the published Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data.. Per the VDOT comments for the adjacent development of Clearbrook Properties, PHR+A has balanced the existing traffic volumes proportionately at all the study area intersections. Figure 2 shows the existing ADT (Average Daily Trips) and A-U, PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area- Figure 3 illustrates the respective existing lane geometry and levels of service- All traffic count data and HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appencii_x section of this _*,-parr A Traffic Impact Analysis of fhe I-81 Distribution Center PH+ Project Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007 Page 2 • • No Scale v -Ri st �@ Chun Rd �1' s Rest . \. \`. Cedar Hill 0 M Hope* r P-LjPA- Combs Chap,pt V,ew Cy 9ua licm 1� Il Figure 1 Vicinity Map - 1-81 Distribution Center, Frederick County, Virginia A Traffic Impact Analysis RAofthr jest Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 H May 30, 2007 3 3 a b � ti � ti 7 �v O � �Is6 7 No Scale (13sJ1681r 1r�2p1(8S)8) S� P. o v O Re st Church Road (122)13 �%t If(s4)120 E ^h (129 o Z � 78(61) U74)163 `� 235(198J fisti ti _ _Site Drive m j SITE Site Dri ve m 2 w Q O ` Z ��16g(8q) HoDetvell Road 11 (34)19 (74)�6 ..on� �(170) �* o rucetolvn Road / (2SS)61*418S(87)IJ �362(47) Bruce 1rI 1 town i /ram 9(46) °a S4(S2) p cn (6g� (41)S4 i1 l (67)S2 i N h 1 �N AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) PT TP+/ \ 1. A Traffic Impact Analysis oithe 1-81 Distribution Center + Project Number: 145 96-1-0 May 30, 2007 4 4 • 0 4 Signalized Intersection �� Signalized LOS=B(B) 4 .109 ,` Intersection LOS=B(B) (?3 No Scale (q)A �► 1 �` g(II) 0 b 4 `- Rest Church Road T rZ Signalized Intersection LOS AlB) rll _ a _ Site Dr_ iv_e 1 SITE Site - rive D�2 a R p Unsignalized O Intersection ti I-loPetvell Road * Unsrvnaf¢at Interse>uan * a' Q- Brucetown Road Brucrtoua C( �,1(A) C* Unsignalized I Q Intersection O 11 M to AM Peak Hour (PM Peale Hour) * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement T� -i T� �J A Denotes two-way left turn lane 1-T T11+/ ` Figure 3 Existing Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center + Project Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007 5 5 • 0 2010 TRAFFIC ANALYSES PHR+A has provided analysis for two (2) alternate build -out conditions. Scenario A assumes that the proposed project will include 750,000 square feet of Warehouse. Scenario B assumes the proposed development of 220,000 square feet of office. 2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS Based upon the VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) historical average daily traffic data (between years 2002 and 2004) for Route 11 within the vicinity of the site, a growth rate of 3.5 % was calculated and applied to the existing traffic volumes (shown in Figure 2) to obtain the 2010 base conditions. Additionally, PHR+A included specific future developments located within the vicinity of the proposed site. Using the 7t1i Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Dip Generation ReDOrt. PHR+A has provided Table 1 to summarize the 2010 "other developments" trip generation_ Tables A- 1 through A-6 are provided in the Appendix section of this report to shoe the trip assignment volumes for each background development - Figure 4 shows the 2010 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 5 shows the respective 2010 background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. Table 1 2010 Background Developments Trip Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount fe Ai11 Peal` hour 0et Total In PAI Peak Hour Out ToW �7, Sempeles Prnperty (Partin) BuOd-out) 130 Industrial Park 598,950 SF 336 74 409 106 398 503 3.719 820 Retail 49,000 SF ,— 40 1022 188 293 391 4_r! Total 398 113 511 ?q3 601 894 i a4(I Gi rbrook Properties (Full BnOd-out) 120 GA Heart' Industrial 120,000 SF 54 7 61 _ 20 23 ! so 932 H-T Restaurant 8,000 SF 48 44 92 53 34 87 1.017 Total 102 52 153 56 54 110 1.197 Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park (Full Build -out) 130 Industrial Park 1,400,000 SF 1,022 224 1,246 t0 1.018 1,288 9,744 820 Retail 20,000 SF 36 23 60 104 113 216 2,386 Total 1,058 247 1,306 374 1.131 1,504 12,130 North Stephenson Tract OMPS Property (Full Build -out) 110 Light Industrial 800,000 SF 752 103 855 118 863 981 5,874 Total 752 103 855 118 863 981 5,874 Stephenson Village (Partial Build -out) 210 Single -Family Detached 429 units 77 232 310 255 144 399 4,290 220 Apartment 240 units 20 103 123 too 49 149 1,573 230 Townhouse/Condo 390 units 26 125 150 127 62 189 3,393 251 Elderly Housing - Detach 266 units 29 51 80 78 44 123 1,064 253 Elderly Housing - Attach 72 units 3 2 5 4 3 7 251 Total 155 513 667 1 564 302 866 1 10,570 A Tragic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center + Project Number: 14596-1-0 T--TAMay 30, 2007 Page 6 A Tra{f c Impact Anah)sis of the I-81 Distribution Center PHProject Number: 14596-1-0 +A May 30, 2007 Page 7 0 0 a 4tr� O zed ntersectio Intersection 0 8M LOS=B(B) No Scale B(B) Signalized Oe A� Intersection LOS=B(B) �Sro G Rest Church 4 Road Signalized New Intersection" Intersection EB - I Lett LOS--C(Q wB - I Thru Fourth Leg G _ SiteC(C) DMe # j QI n mec Intersection SITE � P Z Site � U (.4)A * 4 DMe # 2 11 Signalized "Suggested Improvements" Intersection Sienalization LOS=B(B) Intersection Aligmnent EB - 1 Left + I Right wB -1 Right 11 NB- I Rtht SB -IRigbt `ooewell Road 11 Blucelocym Road it r q 1��A '(A)� Unsignalized Intersection p� Unsignalized Intersection �� F o] 8��eto`Yn Road F Ln � a) AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) PT T-R+/ n \ lI * * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement Denotes two-way left turn lane ,-i i rupee impact Imatysis o7 tine t-dl DistribUtton Genter Project Number: 14596-1-0 "R+AMay 30, 2007 Page 8 • TRIP GENERATION Using the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has prepared Tables 2a and 2b to summarize the trip generation associated the proposed I-81 Distribution Center for Scenario A and Scenario B, respectively . Table 2a Proposed Development: I-81 Distribution Center Scenario A: Trin Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount AM Peak Hour In Out Total Pbl Peak Hour In Out Total ADT 150 warehousing (750,000 SF)� 150 employees 79 31 110 44 81 124 756 Total 1 79 31 110 1 44 81 124 1 756 ' Assumed a worst -cast of 1 employee per 5000 square fee -- Table 2b Proposed Development: I-81 Distribution Center Scenario B: Trin Generation Summary Code Land Use Amount AM Peak Hour In Out Total PM Peak Hour In Out Total ADT 710 Office 220,000 SF 310 42 352 55 270 325 2,448 Total 310 42 352 55 270 325 2.448 TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNiICENT The distribution of trips, shown in Figure 6, was based upon local travel patterns for the roadway network surrounding the proposed 1-81 Distribution Center site. Figures 7a and 7b show the respective development -generated Aivl/PM peak hour trips and ADT assignments for Scenario A and Scenario B, respectively. 2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS The I-81 Distribution Center assigned trips (Figures 7a and To) were added to the 2010 background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figures 8a and 8b show the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations within the study area for Scenario A and Scenario B, respectively. Figures 9a and 9b show the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service for Scenario A and Scenario B, respectively. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report. A Traffic Impact Analysis of the jest Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 P"R+AMay 30, 2007 Page 9 40% 10% No Scale Rest Chufih Road )W _ _Site Drive I SITE site Drive # 2 11 no eivell Road Bruceto%vn Road 40% 10% 1-T TPA"/ Figure 6 Trip Distribution Percentages A Tragic Impact Analysis R+Aoftltr jest Distribution Center PHProject Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 200710 Page 10 0 0 C 0 No Scale 6(16 ) �. O (76)48 Rest Church a Road T ,! a E A G 12(3, 6 i1 �)32 ~� (16) Sete (I2,Lr Drive o ry SITE 11 Site Drive # 2 220.400 n J No ewell Road J1 t O t ► Brucetown R �r 1 606) 1 O Braceto", p (9)16*r�► ]] AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) PT TP+/ A \ 1 ' PT-TR+A A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007 Page I 1 a NroC ti TW No Scale 1► r,8(sq e O Cn Rest (33)186 �>1 Ch4rch Road ♦ b a n G O � 1 7(108) f (22)124 8(54) Site ` w Drive I 1 a N SITE 11 y� 1 Site Drive 2 (18g)3p (40)6 � n 1 � d _ ) Hopetive7l Road �y 0 Brucetown ; c O� g cetokn 7j a 62 (II)Cn �� 1 I1 AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) TIP �py +A ,. , Scenario B: Development -Generated Trip Assignments A Traffic Impact Analysis of the jest Distribution Center R+APHProject Number: 145 96- l -0 May 30, 202 1 Page 2 A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007 Page 13 PHP-\+-A A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007 Page 14 • Signalized Intersection ' LOS=B(B) �` 6 No Scale Right in /Right out Cn Rest ChB'ch Road Unsignalized (� Intersection Drnei SITE Unsignalized p Intersection FQ $n'c� et n Road Intersection * q� ce(o * wn Rua T i'(F >F �F ) �f fi, -14 r -I- I Signalized G O Intersection LOS=B(B) B(73) (t3jg Signalized "New Intersection" Intersean EB - I Left LOS=C(C) H'B - I Thru Fourth Les U �1 (�c vim► Signalized Improve ts" Intersecdoe SigAzlization LOS=B(B) Intetsmd. A.lignmeat EB -1 Leff + I Right NVB -I Right NB - 1 Right SB-I Riailt (C" u r Attic Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement Denotes two-way left turn lane Figure 9a Scenario A: 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Traffic ImpactAnalysis oftPr jest Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 R+A May 30, 2007PH15 Page IS Signalized ro Intersection LOS=B(B) 0/(No Scale �� �M) Right in Right out Cn rn r Rest Church Road M Intersectioned LOS=B(C) (C)C / G \ G� r Unsignalizec O Intersection Oti �11 -f- Driv SITE Drive \ ed O ioS�cj \ Sig ualized "New intersection" Intmection EB-ILef LOS=C(C) VVB - I Thru Fourth Le" � a Signah7rd ImQrovemeuts" Isterscctioa Sigaartritioo LOS=C(C) Intersectioe:Uisnment EB - 1 Left+ 1 Right WR -I Right NB -I Right SE - 1 1Seh[ 11 Road s 10 Brucerown Road (C)C * -o it 1 Unsignalized U Intersection Br veto" ROa "i (")p �0 AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) * * Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement 11 Denotes two-way left turn lane ]Figure 9b Scenario B: 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service A Tragic hnpact Ana[ ts1 is of the jest Distribution Center Project Number: 14596-1-0 R+A May 30, 2007PH16 Page 16 • 0 CONCLUSION Assuming the suggested improvements, all the study area intersections will maintain overall levels of service "C" or better during 2010 build -out conditions for both the scenarios. Based upon HCS+ analysis, the following describes the reconunended roadway improvements for each of the study area intersections during each scenario: Route 11 / Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road: Alignment of the intersection, traffic signalization, one (1) eastbound left -turn and one (1) eastbound right -turn lane, one (1) northbound right -turn lane, one (1) westbound right -turn lane and one (1) southbound right -turn lane will be required to maintain levels of service "C" during 2010 background and build -out conditions for Scenario A and Scenario B. Route 11 / Rest Church Road: Along with the additional westbound leg, this intersection would require one (1) eastbound left -turn lane, one (1) westbound thru lane, one (1) northbound right -turn lane and one (1) southbound left -turn lane to maintain levels of service "C" during 2010 background and build -out conditions for Scenario A and Scenario B. Route 11 / Site -Drive #1: This is a new right in/right out only intersection for Scenario A and Scenario B of 2010 build -out conditions. Route 11 / Site -Drive #2: This is a new intersection. It will require a southbound right -turn lane in Scenario A and traffic signalization and a southbound right -turn lane in Scenario B of 2010 build -out conditions. Pedestrian and Bike accessibility will be addressed during Site Plan time. NOTE: The aforementioned improvements have yet to be funded_ A Traffic Impact Analysis of the jest Distribution Center PT-TR+AProject Number: 14596-1-0 May 30, 2007 Page 17 0 0 E. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply The I-81 Distribution Center site exists within the designated SWSA of Frederick County (see Figure 5). The FCSA has confirmed that they will provide water and sewer service to the site. A newly constructed 6-inch sanitary forcemain has been installed along the easterly side of Route 11. An on -site sanitary pumping station will be constructed for direct connection to the forcemain. There are no known limiting factors for the conveyance of sewage and sewage treatment from this property. Capacity and daily usage will be addressed at the time of site plan submission. Potable water and fire protection will be supplied via the 12-inch water line located along the easterly side of Route 11. The impact of the additional use created by this rezoning is acceptable and manageable. Figure 6 shows the locations of utility infrastructure planned in this phase of development. I. - It lb, Sys M1 f P rx q rl ' � f � r r Llearbr�oka � �� a EM r' r IDISTRIBUTION CENTER TAS y Datei10/24/06 Job No.07-06-0072 Pint. 9"M W I I I FREDEDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Drawn b Number, TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. SWSA DOH Cadd file no., FIGURE 5 WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA Checked by SWSAMAP.DWG Scaler N/A 0 F. Site Drainage Figure 7 shows the natural drainage pattern that exists on this site. The lack of concentration of the drainage allows the designer to utilize low impact type stormwater management techniques. Design criteria will protect the natural swale areas to the maximum extent possible. Disturbance will be primarily by right angle road or driveway crossings. Adequate channel, inlet, and culvert calculations will be provided during the design phase of the project to ensure direct runoff is contained within the channel and post development velocities protect the existing ditches along Route 11. 0 0 G. Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Approximate designated dumpster locations are shown on Figure 8. During the design process, appropriately screened dumpster locations will be determined. Contractual arrangements will be made with a Waste Management Service to properly dispose of the solid waste. The following table provides an estimate of increase in tonnage presented by this project at build -out. 0 0 I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Solid Waste Generation Summary Frederick County, Virginia Unit Type Amount Unit Unit Value Total uantit #/S Ft Warehouse 739,000 Sq Ft 0.01 7,390 Office 11,000 Sq Ft 0.05 550 Total Waste (#'s)/day = 7,940 Estimated Solid Waste = 3.97 (tons)/day • H. Historic Sites and Structures A search for historical structures on the subject property was conducted through the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR). A maps only archives search utilizing the DHR cultural inventory for archaeological sites and architectural structures revealed one potential historical structure, identified as File No. 034-0926 (Nathaniel Branson House), on the subject site. This property was then evaluated for its eligibility for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). Based upon the criteria established for evaluation of the property for its potential eligibility for NRHP listing, the property was evaluated for its historic and architectural significance. Based upon the NRHP criteria and the information collected from the physical inspection and documented research on the property, the Nathaniel Branson House property is not recommended eligible for listing in the NRHP. The property is NOT: a. associated with an important event in history b. associated with a person significant in history c. reflective of a distinctive character of building type, period or method of construction d. associated with a works of a master or has high artistic value, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity, or yield important information to prehistory or history Therefore, this property is not recommended eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. I. Impact on Community Facilities The Frederick County Development Impact Model (DIM) has not been run for this project as per E-mail with Ms. Susan Eddy on October 27, 2006. Proffers have been offered which will mitigate the effects of impacts on the county. Monetary contributions for fire and rescue are included in the Proffer Statement. - � - - - - - - I-81 (R/W VARIES) - - - - 109, ��N�P aR�H - - - - - - - - - - —oll - - _ F — _ — — — — 25STBACK �i DUMPSTER ..—.. _.. �.. �.. _..�..�.. W/PAD m ty OD A I TRAILER PARKING DUMPSTER ,' I m b I (12k55' TVP.) WlPAD D �A °y I �� (� C C 2� �%� I 200' TRUCK COURT I I Z-4 � o m A= � Ll o I739,OODWAREHOUSE / I � 11,000 S.F. S.F. OFFICE SPACE I a3 SPACES WAREHOUSE L u SPACES OFFICE SPACE PROVIDED 119 SPACES rl m C PROPOiENDEWA I I O •c � I ( Z PROPOSE PUMP I 'I Q 2 N A ly STAT}ON O I Q' D I I 200' TRUCK COURT `° r z ru (11 R � I TRAILER PARKINGcy) I , I V m m n IL„ (12k35'TVP) 3- O O 1 I - I O PR POSED ' ' 75 SETBACK r - SEWER fl Z — SANfTLME o rs fSa T. 11 ( WI DES— 5� w O C aI 6' FORCE MAIN 12' WATER UME 3TORMWATER V MANAGEMENT POND N �� ! 0 Background Development Traffic Volumes M m� M � S Ho- No Scale (294)193� 2379(262) (ISS)189 C In � roy � N �1( Rest Qur (37o)154,� oft"! chRead ♦ (62)138� �1 a ct N G p � b %..9p(70 (2DO),87 -W � ~77p(Z)7) ti L 1 Site ry Drive # I �. 0 SITE ° Site Drive#2 N M � F a N J Z �78(9-;) Ho sell Road 0 `U In O t� B'ucetoWn Ro 01( Y (63 r ) 82(138 ) 98(10 (28)33 a 0) ` = a n a v 1 7q(56) 6(S 81)81 Oa 62) cn (49)64 (79)62 �� •/ V; b 11 AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) n /� 1- T TR+/ \ _ , a �ro w o No Scale �1 a Rest Church Ro ad • ��► l} o. G O ` � �J Site Dnve # 1 �; O Site Drive # 2 � i a F� :f Z �'a,113 Ho ewell Road iy t I O .f` � _o o f Brucetown R *.ftw 1► rCj Bru�etowo R � � r� oa N h SITE !I AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) n �T TP + / \ i 4 mS OS' No Scale Rest Church Road V a �A y G O � �f W o SITE 'Z Site Drive # 1 e 11 0 j Site live # 2 I� A Q Ho ewell Road �~ O c tie w o CV � t Brucefou� Ro 3(Z4) �► v i O BNCerown (31}� r 0 1I AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour) PT TP+/ /� \ t z 1 , HCS+ Worksheets Detailed Report . Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 05/30/2007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 73 163 235 78 122 91 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 2 2 2 43 1 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 10.88 0.88 10.88 0.88 1 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, Ii 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3_0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, P 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= 1Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 I ano Grnnn f:anacifv Cnntrnf DPfav- and LOS Determination - -- -- - - - -EB ---- -- - - - WB NB SB LT I TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 83 185 267 89 139 103 Lane Group Capacity, c 391 1774 1774 792 442 554 v/c Ratio, X 0.21 0.10 0.15 0.11 0.31 0.19 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.35 Uniform Delay, di 11.2 10.6 10.8 10.6 19.0 18.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 1 10.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 .rl-.//t'ATl..__..,...-_J.- __ -1 L1___ _---._\ A__.7____t_1--_-\r ---1 n_....L_--\m- --- .-\ n . rinnv. ---r Detailed Report • Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 05/30/2007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SIB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 129 174 1 198 61 115 202 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 2 2 1 2 43 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 1 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 1 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 147 198 225 69 131 230 Lane Group Capacity, c 386 1685 1685 752 473 594 v/c Ratio, X 0.38 0.12 10.13 0.09 0.28 0.39 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.38 0.38 Uniform Delay, d, 13.5 11.7 11.8 11.5 17.4 18.3 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 (-1 /1! \- . 1 l ". % A i 1 1 %T 1 ( .. %T % 11 1 - . C /I-Innn- Detailed Report 9 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps All other areas Frederick County, VA Existing Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 168 165 201 156 68 85 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 24 43 2 18 2 143 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 10.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 Unit Extension, UE 1 13.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 1. 13.0 13.0 Filterina/Metering. I 1 11.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 1 1 1 1 11.000 1 11.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0' G= G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 191 188 228 177 77 97 Lane Group Capacity, c 1459 1129 589 1533 619 395 v/c Ratio, X 0.13 0.17 0.39 0.12 0.12 0.25 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.35 Uniform Delay, di 10.7 0.0 12.4 10.6 17.7 18.5 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.950 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.3 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 171-.///'.\rl%--._Y,.,__'_ __ -1 C,..l.t.-__\ A-.7.__1-1_--\r _._._1 f+_u_-.__\-n1-1r/rn ....--.- r /1) n /,In n17 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 05/30/2007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 256 135 85 228 47 116 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 1 24 43 18 2 2 43 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 IZO 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Grou Ca ac" ,Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 291 153 97 259 53 132 Lane Group Capacity, c 1459 1129 462 1774 619 395 v/c Ratio, X 0.20 0.14 0.21 0.15 0.09 0.33 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.35 Uniform Delay, d, 11.1 0.0 11.2 10.8 17.4 19.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.950 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 Initial Queue Delay, d3 1 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o(An + 1ZMA/1)An7 Detailed Report • 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 05/30/2007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Rte. 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 134 .120 71 54 1 134 242 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 1 2 1 1 2 7 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 32.0 G= G= G= G= 36.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 152 136 81 61 152 275 Lane Group Capacity, c 708 633 553 799 799 1583 v/c Ratio, X 0.21 0.21 0.15 0.08 0.19 0.17 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.40 0.40 0.45 0.45 0.45 1.00 Uniform Delay, d1 15.8 15.8 13.0 12.5 13.2 0.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.9 15.9 13.1 12.6 13.3 0.1 L:1_. ///Y.%T\ - ___._. _._1_ _._ 1 n _11.._ - _1 A ._ .1__ I _1__ AY . . .1 n ­4 \T \ ^1 1 n1 / , I I- I-- Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Rte. 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L R L T T R Volume, V (vph) 322 54 116 231 120 143 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 1 7 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I - 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 1 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Penn 06 07 08 Timing G= 35.0 G= G= G= G= 33.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= IY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Grou Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 366 61 132 263 136 163 Lane Group Capacity, c 774 693 515 733 733 1583 v/c Ratio, X 0.47 0.09 0.26 10.36 0.19 0.10 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.41 0.41 1.00 Uniform Delay, di 16.0 13.2 15.4 16.2 15.0 0.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 13.2 15.7 16.5 15.1 1 0.0 Two -Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell/Brucetown Road/Route Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell/Brucetown Road North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 42 141 52 11 208 120 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 47 160 59 12 236 136 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 68 54 52 54 39 62 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 77 61 59 61 44 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 19 7 7 19 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR I LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (veh/h) 47 12 175 197 C (m) (veh/h) 1159 1321 495 477 lc 0.04 0.01 0.35 0.41 95% queue length 0.13 0.03 1.58 2.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 7.8 16.2 17.8 LOS A A C C .. 4-7_.. .1 C'._uL.__\ A-.L__.1_1___AT - --I n_u:__.,._\T______\__nt_i T-1 In Two -Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Intersection Hope well/Brucetown Road/Route Analyst PHRA genc /Co. PHRA urisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Year Existing Conditions [Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell/Brucetown Road North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 88 264 72 41 155 120 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 100 300 81 46 176 136 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Leff Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 68 41 67 52 46 47 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 77 46 76 59 52 53 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 13 7 7 13 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h) 100 46 164 199 C (m) (veh/h) 1221 1151 358 369 /c 0.08 0.04 0.46 0.54 95% queue length 0.27 0.12 2.32 3.07 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.2 8.3 23.3 25.6 LOS A A C D Two -Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./1 81 NB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 1 81 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 19 76 133 68 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 21 86 0 0 151 77 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 24 98 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 27 0 111 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 0 7 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration r LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 21 138 C (m) (veh/h) 1311 879 vlc 0.02 0.16 95% queue length 0.05 0.56 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 9.9 LOS I A A !': 1 - . I I r % ram 1 - , \ ♦ 1 1 1 \ T 1 — . i \ m 1 -1 + --- . Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 NB Ram s Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 05/30/2007 Analysis Year Existing Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 181 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 34 74 170 84 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 38 84 0. 0 193 95 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 38 102 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 43 0 115 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 0 7 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 38 158 C (m) (veh/h) 1246 815 v/c 0.03 0.19 95% queue length 0.09 0.72 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.0 10.5 LOS 1 A B 1-.1-.//r.%r - ------..,- _-.1 n.,,. -.\ s 1 1 1 %I i n .. km \ —1 �nI—, Two -Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ / 81 SB Ram s Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 181 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 67 29 85 72 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 76 32 96 81 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 1 0" Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 28 17 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 31 0 19 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 96 50 C (m) (veh/h) 1452 942 vlc 0.07 0.05 95% queue length 0.21 0.17 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 10.5 I _os A B 1:1_.//t'.\l11%__________l._ __-.] C�_u:__-_\ A__1____1 _7____\T ___t Cl_u._____\T _.__._\__n7_1n AI . . Two -Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 SB Ram s Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year Existing Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: l 81 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 55 24 87 121 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 62 27 98 137 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 53 35 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 60 0 39 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration r LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 98 99 C (m) (veh/h) 1475 908 vlc 0.07 0.11 95% queue length 0.21 0.37 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.6 11.1 LOS A B _-'_\T ___I C1_u:__.__\T____._\__n1_1 OA/i__-._ CInl /nnn- Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 84 368 327 134 140 284 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 1 2 2 1 2 43 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.B8 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A I A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 11.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 1 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm. Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Penn 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 39.0 G= G= G= G= 29.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 1 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= I Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ntrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH . RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 95 418 372 152 159 323 Lane Group Capacity, c 344 1729 1729 772 457 574 v/c Ratio, X 0.28 0.24 0.22 0.20 0.35 0.56 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.49 0.36 0.36 Uniform Delay, di 12.1 11.9 11.7 11.6 18.6 20.4 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.16 Incremental Delay, d2 0.4 0.1 1 0.1 1 0.11 0.5 1.3 r_1__1/r.\r�___------- - ----1 0 --_1 C1-u____-\IT' ______\-n1_1Ofn ci)n/nnn17 Detailed Report • Page 1 of 2 HCS+T" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 148 316 489 274 132 348 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 1 2 2 1 2 43 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 36.0 G= G= G= G= 37.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 85.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 168 359 556 311 150 395 Lane Group Capacity, c 226 1502 1502 670 549 689 v/c Ratio, X 0.74 0.24 0.37 0.46 0.27 0.57 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.42 0.44 0.44 Uniform Delay, d, 20.6 15.7 16.7 17.6 15.4 18.1 Progression Factor, PF 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.30 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 Incremental Delay, dZ 12.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 1.2 Detailed Repoi-t • 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 216 189 1281 185 236 98 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 124 43 2 18 1 1 1 2 143 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 112.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3 2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 245 215 319 210 268 111 Lane Group Capacity, c 1459 1129 559 1533 619 395 v/c Ratio, X 0.17 1 0.19 0.57 10.14 0.43 0.28 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.35 Uniform Delay, di 10.9 0.0 14.0 10.7 19.9 18.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.950 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 1 0.1 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.5 0.4 Detailed Report 0 • Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 308 155 1331 291 1 156 133 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 24 43 2 18 1 2 143 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 10.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 _ 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0. G= G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 1 Y= Y= 1Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacitty,Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 350 176 376 331 177 151 Lane Group Capacity, c 1459 1129 505 1533 619 395 v/c Ratio, X 0.24 10.16 0.74 10.22 0.29 0.38 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.35 Uniform Delay, di 11.4 0.0 15.9 11.2 18.8 19.5 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.950 1.000 1.000 11.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.30 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 5.9 0.1 0.3 0.6 Detailed Report 0 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 154 268 231 10 80 10 102 182 33 33 560 278 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 7 2 2 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 1 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 8.0 G= 10.0 G= 14.0 G= G= 8.0 G= 38.0 G= G= Y= 0 IY= 0 Y= 6 Y IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca aci , Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH I RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 175 305 263 11 91 11 116 207 38 38 636 316 Lane Group Capacity, c 687 497 422 157 552 246 245 750 915 641 908 1231 v/c Ratio, X 0.25 0.61 0.62 0.07 0.16 0.04 0.47 0.28 0.04 0.06 0.70 0.26 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.42 0.42 0.58 0.58 0.51 0.78 Uniform Delay, d, 30.3 28.9 29.0 37.6 32.9 32.3 18.8 17.0 8.2 8.5 16.8 2.8 Progression Factor, F 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Detailed Report 0 • Page 1 of 2 HCS+'m DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center Volume and Timing input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 370 208 86 47 375 47 224 727 26 1 26 281 164 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 7 2 2 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0" Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 6.0 G= 8.0 G= 15.0 G= G= 12.0 G= 30.0 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= ly= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 83.0 Lane Group Ca aci , Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB I NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 420 236 98 53 426 53 255 826 30 30 319 186 Lane Group Capacity, c 580 516 782 128 641 286 569 899 1030 105 642 954 v/c Ratio, X 0.72 0.46 0.13 0.41 0.66 0.19 0.45 0.92 0.03 0.29 0,50 0.19 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.17 0.28 0.49 0.07 0.18 0.18 0.58 0.51 0.65 0.36 0.36 0.60 Uniform Delay, di 32.7 24.8 11.3 36.8 31.7 28.8 9.7 18.9 5.2 18.9 20.6 7.4 Progression Factor, I I I - I I I I I I I I F 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 l 1 /// \T i 1 f1 •i % . 1 1 1 \T 1 f'I .. \m \ -1 1n-n . Two -Way Stop Control 45 • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Intersection Hopewell/Brucetown Road/Route Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA j Date Performed 05/30/2007 Analysis Year [Analysis Time Period AM Peak I Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell/Brucetown Road North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 126 360 62 13 663 171 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 143 409 70 14 753 194 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 137 64 183 64 46 74 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 155 72 207 72 52 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 19 7 7 19 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h) 143 14 208 434 C (m) (veh/h) 705 1058 0 198 v/c 0.20 0.01 2.19 95% queue length 0.76 0.04 34.25 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.4 8.4 591.1 LOS B A F F Two -Way Stop Control • ni Page 1 of 2 JGeneral Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 [Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell/Brucetown Road Intersection Orientation: North -South Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume (veh/h) 248 807 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 281 917 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 1 1 Configuration L Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Eastbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) 111 49 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 126 55 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 13 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized Lanes 0 1 Configuration LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration L L v (veh/h) 281 55 C (m) (veh/h) 917 665 v/c 0.31 0.08 95% queue length 1.30 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.7 10.9 LOS B B Intersection Hopewell/Brucetown Road/Route Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions South Street: Route 11 Period (hrs): 0.25 3 4 R L 86 49 0.88 0.88 97 55 — 7 Two Way Left Turn Lane 0 0 1 TR L 0 0 0 9 Southbound 5 T 396 0.88 450 .C_1,_ Ilt/ .\Tl^___ -1 C,._u.:___\ A__-1-_--\T ___1 ['1_u;____\m__----\-_nt_1 OT-11 ...__._ 1 11 n Innnn Detailed Report . • Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Intersection Rt. 11 & Hopewell Analyst PHR+A Rd/Brucetown Agency or Co. PHR+A Area Type All other areas Date Performed 0513012007 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Time Period AM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2010 BK Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R LT R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 137 64 183 64 46 74 126 360 62 1 13 663 171 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 7 19 7 7 19 1 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated A A A A A A A A A A A A (A) Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green, e Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3#3.0 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0�3.0 3.0 Filterinq/MeteringI 1.000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .00 000 .000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 60 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 50 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 30.0 G= G= G= G= 48.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= 1Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 144 67 129 115 57 133 379 65 14 698 127 Lane Group Capacity, c 404 532 503 452 503 216 947 805 453 947 805 v/c Ratio, X 0.36 0.13 0.26 0.25 0.11 0.62 0.40 0.08 0.03 0.74 0.16 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.33 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 Uniform Delay, d1 22.7 20.9 21.9 21.9 20.8 14.6 12.5 10.2 10.0 16.1 10.7 I Progression Factor, PF11.000 11.000 11.000 I 11.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 11.000 11.000 11.000 0.11 10.11 10.11 1 10.11 10.11 10.20 10.11 10.11 10.11 10.29 10.117 Detailed Report • Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt. 11 & Hopewell Rd/Brucetown Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 BK Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing In of EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R LT R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 111 49 173 62 55 56 248 807 86 49 396 172 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 7 13 7 7 13 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 .95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 .95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 .000 .0 00 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 30 0 0 10 0 0 10 0 0 30 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing= G= 26.0 G= G= G= G= 52.0 G= G= IG Y= 6 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= I.Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 _ Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 117 52 151 123 48 261 849 80 52 417 149 Lane Group Capacity, c 339 473 425 408 436 476 1026 872 165 1026 872 v/c Ratio, X 0.35 0.11 0.36 0.30 0.11 0.55 0.83 0.09 0.32 0.41 0.17 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 Uniform Delay, d1 25.3 23.5 25.4 24.9 23.5 11.7 15.4 8.5 9.8 10.5 8.9 Progression Factor, PF 1,000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.15 0.37 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 Two -Way Stop Control • Page 1 of 2 eral Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 V�nalysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Intersection Hopewell Rd./ / 81 NB Ramps urisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions South Street: 181 NB Period (hrs): 0.25 Movement 1 2 3 4 L T R L Volume (veh/h) 22 219 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Row Rate, HFR. (veh/h) 25 248 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 16 — — 7 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 Lanes 0 1 % 0 0 Configuration LT Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 9 10 L T R L Volume (veh/h) 28 158 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.86 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 31 0 179 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 16 0 16 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach. N Storage 0 RT Channelized 0 Lanes 1 0 0 0 0 Westbound 5 T 176- 0.88 200 0 0 0 0 V 0 onfiguration LR Delay, Queue Length and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 25 210 C (m) (veh/h) 1106 685 lc 0.02 0.31 95% queue length 0.07 1.30 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 12.6 LOS A B /� � I / /"1 \ T� . 1 !1 � • \ ♦ 1 1 1 \ T t !Y � � \ T \ I\t � (l T / � Two -Way Stop Control • • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISIte Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed Analysis Time Period PM Peak Page 1 of 2 Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 NB Ramps urisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 1 81 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 39 184 219 245 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR. (veh/h) 44 209 0 0 248 278 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 44 142 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 50 0 161 0 0 0 ercent Heavy Vehicles 12. 0 t 12 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 44 211 C (m) (veh/h) 992 638 v/c 0.04 0.33 95% queue length 0.14 1.44 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.8 13.4 LOS A B Two -Way Stop Conti-ol • Page 1 of 2 lGeneral Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed Analysis Time Period M Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road Intersection Orientation: East-West Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Movement 1 2 L T Volume (veh/h) 77 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 87 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — Median Type RT Channelized Lanes 0 1 Configuration Upstream Signal 0 Minor Street Northbound Movement 7 8 L T Volume (veh/h) Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 Flared Approach N Storage 0 RT Channelized Lanes 0 0 Configuration Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 4 Lane Configuration LT v (veh/h) 137 C (m) (veh/h) 1380 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 LOS A Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 SB Ramps urisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions orth/South Street: 181 SB tudv Period (hrs): 0.25 Westbound 0 Undivided Southbound Northbound • •. • 1 n ,.• . .1 A . .1 .1 .1 . AT . - _1 n _-C._ - _� m..._.A._n1..1 nT . I..__ Two -Way Stop Control • • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information cy/co. PHRA Performed ,sis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 SB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Background Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: l 81 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West I 5 [Study Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 63 28 125 138 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 71 31 142 156 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 12 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT U stream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 160 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 181 0 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 D 0 12 0 12 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR (veh/h) 142 226 C (m) (veh/h) 1430 557 v/c 0.10 0.41 95% queue length 0.33 1.96 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.8 16.7 LOS A C Detailed Report • • Page 1 of 2 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 05/30/2007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 84 400 1 333 146 140 300 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 2 2 1 2 43 1 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3- 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0. 0 Lane Width 12.0. 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 1 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 38.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 . Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v. 95 455 378 166 159 341 Lane Group Capacity, c 333 1685 1685 752 473 594 v/c Ratio, X 0.29 0.27 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.57 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.47 0.38 0.38 Uniform Delay, di 12.8 12.6 12.3 12.3 .17.9 19.9 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.17 I Incremental Delay, d2 10.5 10.1 1 1 1 0.1 10.1 10.4 1 1 1.4 1 1 1 Detailed Report . Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 148 333 1 505 306 132 356 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 1 2 2 2 43 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 .88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 _ Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 35.0 G= G= G= 1Y= IY= G= 33.0 G= G= G= Y='6 1Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analvsis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 168 378 574 348 150 405 Lane Group Capacity, c 231 1552 1552 693 521 653 v/c Ratio, X 0.73 0.24 0.37 0.50 0.29 0.62 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay, di 18.6 14.2 15.1 16.2 15.7 18.6 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.29 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.20 Incremental Delay, dZ 11.0 0.1 0.1 0.6 0.3 1.8 197_.//C-1.\rl-------_- _ ___ -1 n_u]---_% A--A__--1 T ---1 C1-u.._-_\T-.--.-\_/1_1 CN/l ,.--_._ ZPInrn nn'7 Detailed Report • . Page 1 of 2 HCS+'M DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 84 492 335 150 140 346 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 1 2 2 2 43 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 -3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped /Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 1 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ns 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 41.0 G= G= G= G= 37.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 95 559 381 170 159 393 Lane Group Capacity, c 318 1616 1616 721 519 651 v/c Ratio, X 0.30 0.35 0.24 0.24 0.31 0.60 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.46 0.41 0.41 Uniform Delay, dl 15.4 15.8 14.9 14.9 17.9 20.8 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.19 Incremental Delay, d2 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.6 F,l­1 Q_++inrrc.\ A.-A,-I_1 .»-\T - I A 10 +r. _ c/2n/1)nn'7 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 NB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 2 2 1 1 1 Lane Group L T T R L R Volume, V (vph) 148 338 1 543 382 132 359 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 43 1 2 2 2 43 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 . 0,. Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, P 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08. Timing G= 43.0 G= G= G= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 168 384 617 434 150 408 Lane Group Capacity, c 239 1695 1695 756 491 616 v/c Ratio, X 0.70 10.23 0.36 10.57 0.31 0.66 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.39 0.39 Uniform Delay, di 18.5 13.8 14.9 16.9 19.1 22.6 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.27 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.24 Incremental Delay, d2 9.0 0.1 0.1 1.1 0.4 2.7 �;70• iir•�r� . ,,,,,o„+� ,rA co,+;--\ n,.,..,i n n n +__ c1'201')n0'7 Detailed Report • 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps All other areas Frederick County, VA 2010 Build -out Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 216 189 1288 185 1268 98 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 124 43 18 2 2 143 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1:000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time foT Pedestrians, P 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 38.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Durabon of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB I SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 245 215 327 210 305 111 Lane Group Capacity, c 1386 1129 459 1685 664 423 v/c Ratio, X 0.18 0.19 0.71 10.12 0.46 0.26 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.47 1.00 0.47 0.47 0.38 0.38 Uniform Delay, di 12.0 0.0 16.7 11.7 18.9 17.3 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 10.950 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 1 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 1 0.28 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 5.2 0.0 0.5 0.3 ___-I c1_______1 ___1 ------ clnn/n nnl Detailed Report • . Page 1 of 2 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 308 155 1347 291 173 133 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 1 24 43 2 18 1 2 43 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Lane Width 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 40.0 G= G= G= G= 28.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 80.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontroi Delay, and LDS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 350 176 394 33.1 197 151 Lane Group Capacity, c 1459 1129 505 1533 619 395 v/c Ratio, X 0.24 10.16 0.78 10.22 0.32 10.38 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.50 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.35 0.35 Uniform Delay, di 11.4 0.0 16.4 11.2 19.0 19.5 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 0.950 1.000 1.000 1.000 1 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.33 0.11 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.1 7.7 0.1 0.3 0.6 to•1/r •�T, , ,,,, o„+� .,,,a Q-I+;--,\ n,,a.,,.t-t.,.,.\r ---I nnn ,... _ c /1A11)nn7 Detailed Report • Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Area Type Jurisdiction Analysis Year Project ID Rest Church Rd/1-81 SB Ramps All other areas Frederick County, VA 2010 Build -out Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V (vph) 216 189 1290 185 360 98 Heavy Vehicles, %HV 124 43 18 2 1 1 2 43 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 1 13 1 1 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.'0 3.0 13.0 1 1 1 1 13.0 1 13.0 Filterina/Meterino. 1 1.000 1.000 11.000 11.000 1 1 1 1 11.000 1 11.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, P 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G=.43.0 G= G= G= IY= G= 35.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 IY= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= I Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrol Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 245 215 330 210 409 111 Lane Group Capacity, c 1394 539 462 1695 688 439 v/c Ratio, X 0.18 0.40 0.71 0.12 0.59 0.25 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.48 0.39 0.39 Uniform Delay, d1 13.4 15.2 18.6 13.0 21.9 1 18.6 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 11.000 1.000 1.000 1 11.000 11.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 1 0.28 0.11 0.18 1 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.5 5.2 0.0 1.4 0.3 _Mo•W"An-,.,,,,- -+� -A eo++;-\ A,-.A,,,.1_1r .ar ­1 n cT) +„ _ ci'1ni0nn�7 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+' DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection RamChurch Rd/I-81 SB Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 2 1 1 Lane Group T R L T L R Volume, V {vph) 308 155 385 291 178 133 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 24 43 2 18 2 43 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, P 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 SB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 48.0 G= G= G= G= 30.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 1Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analvsis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, ontrof Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 350 176 438 331 202 151 Lane Group Capacity, c 1556 602 539 1635 590 376 v/c Ratio, X 0.22 0.29 0.81 0.20 0.34 0.40 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.33 0.33 Uniform Delay, d, 11.1 11.6 17.3 11.0 22.6 23.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.35 0.11 10.11 10.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 0.3 9.2 0.1 0.3 0.7 ,,,,a co++;„ \ n„a,,,.1_1r ,.\T ---I nor +., _ 1Zi2ni1)nn17 Detailed Report 0 i Page 1 of 2 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 154 268 278 10 80 10 120 185 33 1 33 568 278 0o Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 7 2 2 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for edestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 t Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 8.0 G= 10.0 G= 14.0 G= G= 8.0 G= 38.0 G= G= Y= 0 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca aci , Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 175 305 316 11 91 11 136 210 38 38 1639 645 316 Lane Group Capacity, c 687 497 422 157 552 246 239 750 915 908 1231 v/c Ratio, X 0.25 0.61 0.75 0.07 0.16 0.04 0.57 0.28 0.04 0.06 0.71 0.26 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.20 0.27 0.27 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.42 0.42 0.58 0.58 0.51 0.78 Uniform Delay, di 30.3 28.9 30.2 37.6 32.9 32.3 19.8 17.0 8.2 8.5 16.9 2.8 IPFrogression [-actor, I I I N I I I I I I I - 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 [__1 - . / /!'1 . \ T\ . _ _ _ ... . - _. - 1 n . " \ A 1 1 1 1 T 1 f ". \ -1 1-1 1 . Detailed Report • 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A Volume and Timing In of EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 370 208 112 1 47 375 47 273 735 26 26 286 164 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 7 2 2 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped I Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12-0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3 2 3.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left I EB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 6.0 G= 7.5 G= 18.5 G= G= 19.0 G= 27.0 G= G= Y= 0 IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca aci , Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH I RT LT TH_ RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 420 236 127 53 426 53 310 835 30 30 325 186 Lane Group Capacity, c 516 538 897 118 729 325 597 908 1020 101 533 818 v/c Ratio, X 0.81 0.44 0.14 0.45 0.58 0.16 0.52 0.92 0.03 0.30 0.61 0.23 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.15 0.29 0.57 0.07 0.21 0.21 0.58 0.51 0.64 0.30 124.2 0.30 0.52 Uniform Delay, d1 37.0 26.1 9.2 40.4 32.3 29.4 11.2 20.3 5.8 27.0 11.9 Progression Factor, 11.000 11.000 I p I 11.000 I I 11.000 11.000 I 1. 000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1. 000 11,000 11,000 Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 154 268 417 10 80 10 127 186 33 33 591 278 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 12 7 2 2 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Predmed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000- 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 125 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12-0 12-0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 1 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3-23.2 3.2 Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 8.0 G= 5.5 G= 14.0 G= G= 5.5 G= 39.0 G= G= Y= 6 Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca aci , Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT I LT TH I RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 175 305 332 11 91 11 144 211 38 38 672 316 Lane Group Capacity, c 745 404 545 157 552 246 232 878 1029 505 770 1134 v/c Ratio, X 0.23 0.75 0.61 0.07 0.16 0.04 0.62 0.24 0.04 0.08 0.87 0.28 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.09 0.16 0.16 0.56 0.49 0.65 0.43 0.43 0.72 Uniform Delay, d1 29.1 33.0 24.5 37.6 32.9 32.3 15.8 13.1 5.6 14.9 23.2 4.5 Progression Factor, P F 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 r ++:.._ \ n...A,. 1_1..._\r ___1 C -44+ ..--\m,........\..1)i_i n 17T +........ ci)nle) nn17 Detailed Report • Page 1 of 2 HCS+- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rest Church Rd/Route 11 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R L T R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 370 207 119 47 375 47 386 754 26 26 287 164 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 7 2 2 7 2 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2:0 2.0 2.0 2-0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stooping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 r 3.2 I 3.2 I 3.2 I Phasing Excl. Left EB Only Thru & RT 04 NB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 4.5 G= 5.0 G= 14.0 G= G= 22.0 G= 26.5 G= G= Y= 6 IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= 0 Y= 6 1Y= iy= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Ca aci , Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 420 235 135 53 426 53 439 857 30 30 326 186 Lane Group Capacity, c 592 393 827 89 552 246 648 957 1038 120 523 844 v/c Ratio, X 0.71 0.60 0.16 0.60 0.77 0.22 0.68 0.90 0.03 0.25 0.62 0.22 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.17 0.21 0.52 0.05 0.16 0.16 0.61 0.54 0.66 0.29 0.29 0.53 Uniform Delay, di 35.1 32.1 11.2 41.9 36.5 33.2 11.2 18.5 5.4 24.2 27.4 11.1 Progression Factor, I I I I I I I I I I I ,F 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f;�P•II( •�Tlnrnrnantc a"A AnAnrlrt-ar\T nnal ARFi +m" s1101'_)00'7 Two -Way Stop Control . 0 Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell/Brucetown Road/Route Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A East/West Street: Hopewell/Brucetown Road North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South tud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 126 368 62 13 666 177 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 143 418 70 14 756 201 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 1 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 153 64 183 64 46 74 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h ) 173 72 207 72 52 84 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 19 7 7 19 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (vehm) 143 14 208 452 C (m) (veh/h) 699 1050 0 191 lc 0.20 0.01 2.37 95% queue length 0.76 0.04 37.18 IControl Delay (s/veh) 11.5 8.5 669.8 LOS 8 A F F C-1_./11'.111----------''- ----1 n_L.]-_'_-\ A'-A_--1-1---AT ---1 0 111_1 r%C\1 �----- c in n innnn Two -Way Stop Control 0 • Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Hope well/Brucetown Road/Route Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A East/West Street: HopewelUBrucetown Road North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 248 812 86 49 404 188 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h) 281 922 97 55 459 213 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 120 49 173 62 55 56 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR veh/h ) 136 55 196 70 62 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 13 7 7 13 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (veh/h) 281 55 195 387 C (m) (veh/h) 896 662 0 0 /c 0.31 0.08 95% queue length 1.35 0.27 ontrol Delay (s/veh) 1 10.8 10.9 LOS B B F F n A 0 ci1)ni1-1nn17 Detailed Report 0 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+- DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Rt. 11 & Hopewell Rd/Brucetown Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center - Project ID Scenario A Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R LT R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 153 64 183 64 46 74 126 368 62 13 666 177 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 7 19 7 7 19 1 7 7 1 7 7 1 7 7 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, h 2.0 2.0 2-0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 '3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 . 3.0 3.0 3.0 � 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped /Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 20 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N. 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3-2 . 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04' SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 27.0 G= G= G= G= 15.0 G= 41:0 G= G= Y= 6 IY= Y= Y= IY= 0 Y= 6 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 95.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB I NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH I RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 161 67 172 115 57 133 387 _ 65 14 _ 701 186 Lane Group Capacity, c 345 454 429 382 429 277 766 651 587 1047 890 v/c Ratio, X 0.47 0.15 0.40 0.30 0.13 0.48 0.51 0.10 0.02 0.67 0.21 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.65 0.59 0.59 Uniform Delay, di 28.1 25.4 27.5 26.6 25.3 19.4 19.6 16.0 6.9 13.2 9.1 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 plq 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000=-000 1.000 1.000 1.000 \_111_1C\A n ---- chn in nnrr Detailed Report 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+'N DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 0513012007 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt. 11 & Hopewell Rd/Brucetown Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center - Project ID Scenario A Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R LT R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 120 49 173 62 55 56 248 812 86 1 49 404 188 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 7 1 13 7 7 13 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 10.95 0.95 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, It 2.0 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 20 20 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 1 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Na 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 F 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 28.0 IY= G= G= G= G= 50.0 G= G= G= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 126 52 182 123 59 261 855 91 52 425 198 Lane Group Capacity, c 365 510 458 442 469 443 987 838 135 987 838 v/c Ratio, X 0.35 0.10 0.40 0.28 0.13 0.59 0.87 0.11 0.39 0.43 0.24 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Uniform Delay, di 23.9 22.1 24.4 23.4 22.2 13.2 17.1 9.5 11.3 11.7 10.2 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ,,,,a co,+;,,n n„a,,,.totr.,_\r ,,,-...t cur +-- Two -Way Stop Control . 40 Page 1 of 2 I TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell/Brucetown Road/Route Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: HopewelUBrucetown Road Atudy orth/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 126 391 62 13 667 179 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 143 444 70 14 757 203 (veh/h) Percent Hea Vehicles 7 — I — 7 1 — I — vy Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 .0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement ;71 8. 9 10 11 12 T R L. T R olume (veh/h) 164 183 64 46 74 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 226 72 207 72 52 84 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 19 7 7 19 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N ;. N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (veh/h) 143 14 208 505 C (m) (veh/h) 697 1026 0 176 v/c 0.21 0.01 - 2.87 95% queue length 0.77 0.04 45.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 8.6 897.0 LOS B I A F F f1A•//r •\Tl.,,,.,,o„+� ­4 Co++;,,,,,,\ A,,,7, 101,.,..\r ---I nnc 4__ ci)ni)nn7 Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: HopewelUBrucetown Road Atudy orth/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 126 391 62 13 667 179 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 143 444 70 14 757 203 (veh/h) Percent Hea Vehicles 7 — I — 7 1 — I — vy Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 .0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement ;71 8. 9 10 11 12 T R L. T R olume (veh/h) 164 183 64 46 74 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 226 72 207 72 52 84 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 19 7 7 19 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N ;. N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (veh/h) 143 14 208 505 C (m) (veh/h) 697 1026 0 176 v/c 0.21 0.01 - 2.87 95% queue length 0.77 0.04 45.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 8.6 897.0 LOS B I A F F f1A•//r •\Tl.,,,.,,o„+� ­4 Co++;,,,,,,\ A,,,7, 101,.,..\r ---I nnc 4__ ci)ni)nn7 vy Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 .0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement ;71 8. 9 10 11 12 T R L. T R olume (veh/h) 164 183 64 46 74 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 226 72 207 72 52 84 (veh/h) Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 19 7 7 19 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N ;. N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR (veh/h) 143 14 208 505 C (m) (veh/h) 697 1026 0 176 v/c 0.21 0.01 - 2.87 95% queue length 0.77 0.04 45.31 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.5 8.6 897.0 LOS B I A F F f1A•//r •\Tl.,,,.,,o„+� ­4 Co++;,,,,,,\ A,,,7, 101,.,..\r ---I nnc 4__ ci)ni)nn7 f1A•//r •\Tl.,,,.,,o„+� ­4 Co++;,,,,,,\ A,,,7, 101,.,..\r ---I nnc 4__ ci)ni)nn7 Two -Way Stop Control • 0 Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Hope well/Brucetown Road/Route Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Buildout Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: Hopewell/Brucetown Road North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 248 813 86 49 423 226 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 281 923 97 55 480 256 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Left Turn Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 Configuration L TR L TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 122 49 173 62 55 56 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 138 55 196 70 62 63 Percent Heavy Vehicles 7 13---t 7 7 13 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration . LTR LTR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L L LTR LTR v (veh/h) 281 55 195 389 C (m) (veh/h) 847 661 0 0 v/c 0.33 0.08 95% queue length 1.46 0.27 Control Delay (s/veh) 11.3 10.9 LOS B B F F _;1,>. A.-.,1,,..1 1,__\T ___1 AT A c i11 n in n nrr Detailed Report Page 1 of 2 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period AM Peak Hour Intersection Rt. 11 & Hopewell Rd/Brucetown Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center - Project ID Scenario B Suggested Improvement Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R LT R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 199 64 183 64 46 74 126 391 62 13 667 179 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 7 19 7 7 1 19 7 7 7 7 7 7 1 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering; 1 1.000 .0 00 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .00 0 .000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 112.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm - 02 03 04 SB Only NS Perm 07 08 Timing G= 27.0 G= G= G= G= 15.0 G= 41.0 G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= 1Y= 0 Y= 6 Y= IY= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 95.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 226 73 208 125 84 ' 143 444 70 15 758 203 Lane Group Capacity, c 342 454 429 378 429 237 766 651 543 1047 890 v/c Ratio, X 0.66 0.16 0.48 0.33 0.20 0.60 0.58 0.11 0.03 0.72 0.23 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.28 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.65 0.59 0.59 Uniform Delay, di 30.0 25.5 28:2 26.9 25.8 20.8 20.5 16.1 7.5 14.0 9.2 Progression Factor, PF 11.000 Eo00 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 files AnA CPffinrye\ A"Aii l t-ov\T nr al I,I A OT? +-- r,/2ni)nm Detailed Report 0 Page 1 of 2 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHR+A Agency or Co. PHR+A Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period PM Peak Hour Intersection Rt. 11 & Hopewell Rd/Brucetown Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions 1-81 Distribution Center - Project ID Scenario B Suggested Improvements Volume and Timing In ut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Lane Group L T R LT - R L T R L T R Volume, V (vph) 122 49 173 62 55 56 248 813 86 1 49 423 226 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 7 13 7 7 13 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 10.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, 11 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 12.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, LIE 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, I 1.000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 1.000 .000 .000 .000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 5 N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, Ne 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, Gp 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EW Perm 02 - 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 28.0 G= G= G= G= 50.0 G= 1 G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 139 56- 197 133 64 282 924 98 56 481 257 Lane Group Capacity, c 362 510 458 439 469 399 987 838 88 987 838 v/c Ratio, X 0.38 0.11 0.43 0.30 0.14 0.71 0.94 0.12 0.64 0.49 0.31 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 0.56 Uniform Delay, d1 24.3 22.1 24.7 23.6 22.3 14.6 18.5 9.5 13.7 12.2 10.7 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 f;l� II(~ \Tlnrnmante an,] Qaffinao\Aiirin,]aIrQv\T n ] ARn+,Y ZZi1ni)nn'7 two-way stop uontrot Wage 1 of 2 46 ft TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed nal sis Time Period 1V Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ l 81 NB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 181 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West jStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement--�:± 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 22 219 182 159 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 25 248 0 0 206 180 Percent Heavy Vehicles 16 — — 7 -- — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT 7R Upstream, Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 I0 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 28 174 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 31 0 197 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 16 0 16 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 25 228 C (m) (veh/h) 1100 688 v/c 0.02 0.33 95% queue length 0.07 1.45 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 12.8 LOS A B I file://C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Sett1ngs\Temp\u2k19C1.tmp 5/30/2007 1 wo-Way stop uontrol Page 1 of 2 • 0 0 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 1 81 NB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 1 81 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 39 184 235 245 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 44 209 0 0 267 278 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street . Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 44 151 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 50 0 171 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 0 12 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 44 221 C (m) (veh/h) 976 637 v/c 0.05 0.35 95% queue length 0.14 1.55 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.9 13.6 LOS A B file: //C:\D ocuments and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Sett1ngs\Temp\u2kl9C5.tmp 5/30/2007 I VVU- YY ay JLUiJ 1,.U11L1U1 17dru 1 Ul G • • 0 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 NB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 181 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 22. 219 185 159 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 25 248 0 0 210 180 Percent Heavy Vehicles 16 — -- 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 28 0 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88. 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 31 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 16 0 16 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 25 31 C (m) (veh/h) 1096 433 v/c 0.02 0.07 95% queue length 0.07 0.23 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 14.0 LOS A B file://C:\Docwnents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Te1np\u2k1AE0.tmp 5/30/2007 iWO- way jLOP �_Oflrui rage i of 169 • 0 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA genc /Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 NB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Project Description East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: / 81 NB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 39 184 273 245 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 44 209 0 0 310 278 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LT TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 44 153 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 50 0 173 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 12 0 12 7 0 7 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Length, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 44 223 C (m) (veh/h) 940 624 v/c 0.05 0.36 95% queue length 0.15 1.62 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.0 13.9 LOS A B file://C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1AE3.tmp 5/30/2007 IWO-Way Stop Control Page 1 ot" 2 0 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Date Performed nal sis Time Period AM Peak Intersection Hopewell Rd./1 81 SB Ramps Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A IProject East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: / 81 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 77 33 127 82 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 87 37 144 93 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 16 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 163 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 185 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 16 0 16 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N Y Storage 0 2 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 144 207 C (m) (veh/h) 1380 516 vlc 0.10 0.40 95% queue length 0.35 1.91 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 17.0 LOS A C file://C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlelcar\Local Settings\Temp\u2k19CB.tmp 5/30/2007 "b" TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 SB Ramps Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 55/1612007 Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 181 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 77 33 129 82 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 87 37 146 93 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 16 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 163 20 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 185 0 22 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 16 0 16 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0. 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service pproach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 146 207 C (m) (veh/h) 1380 498 v/c 0.11 0.42 95% queue length 0.35 2.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 17.3 LOS A C file://C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Te1np\u2k1AE6.tmp 5/30/2007 I wv- ry ay 0LVIJ \.viiuvi 1 abc t V1 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Analyst PHRA genc /Co. PHRA Date Performed Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Site Dr# 1/Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center- Scenario A East/West Street: Site Drivewa # 1 North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South — IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 971 583 9 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 1103 0 0 662 10 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T TR u stream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 13 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 25 7 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 13 C (m) (veh/h) 421 v/c 0.03 95% queue length 0.10 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.8 LOS B Approach Delay -- -- 13.8 file://C:\Docuinents and Settings\AndurlekarEocal Settings\Temp\u2k19D9.tmp 5/30/2007 VYV- ry C-Ly 'jwp �.vuuU1 rage 1 01 L • • • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Intersection Site Dr # 1/Route 11 Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center -Scenario A East/West Street: Site Driveway # 1 North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 495 836 16 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 562 0 0 950 18 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 7 Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 5 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 25 7 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 5 C (m) (veh/h) 282 v/c 0.02 95% queue length 0.05 Control Delay (s/veh) 18.0 LOS C pproach Delay I I I I 18.0 file: //C:\DocummitS and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Temp\u2kl9D4.tmp 5/30/2007 1. Wv- VV ay 'D Lup L.vllll vl 1 aYvl+ 1 vi L TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information ISite Information Intersection Hopewell Rd./ 181 SB Ramps Analyst PHRA Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: Hopewell Road North/South Street: 181 SB Ramps Intersection Orientation: East-West IStudy Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 63 28 179 138 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 71 31 203 156 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 12 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration TR LT Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 160 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 0 181 0 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 12 0 12 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N y Storage 0 1 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LT LR v (veh/h) 203 226 C (m) (veh/h) 1430 428 vlc 0.14 0.53 95% queue length 0.49 3.00 Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 22.4 LOS I A C file: //C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Teinp\u2k1AE9.t1iip 5/30/2007 1 GL6%, 1 Vl I - IS • 0 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information Analyst PHRA Intersection Site Dr # 1/Route 11 Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center- Scenario B East/West Street: Site Driveway # 1 North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 514 0 62 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 584 0 0 0 70 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 6 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 6 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 3 7 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R (veh/h) 6 C (m) (veh/h) 1035 v/c 0.01 95% queue length 0.02 Control Delay (s/veh) 8.5 LOS A Approach Delay -- -- 8.5 file://C:\Documents and Settings\AndurlekarEocal Sett1ngs\Temp\u2k1AEC.trnp 5/30/2007 I VV U- VV tl.y 0LUP %.U11L1 U1 rdgt' 1 Ul G • • 0 • TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA gent /Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Intersection Site Dr # 1/Route 11 Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B East/West Street: Site Driveway # 1 North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R olume (veh/h) 1119 602 11 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 1271 0 0 684 12 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 — — 7 — — Median Type Undivided RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration T TR Upstream Signal 1 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 0 0 45 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 0 0 0 7 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 Configuration R Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration R v (veh/h) 45 C (m) (veh/h) 449 v/c 0.10 95% queue length 0.33 Control Delay (s/veh) 13.9 LOS B Approach Delay -- -- 13.9 file://C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Temp\u2k1AEF.tmp 5/30/2007 I WO- W ay 3Lop `.onnrui rage i uI L •• •• TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Isite Information Analyst PHRA Intersection Site Dr # 2/Route 11 Agency/Co. PHRA Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Date Performed 0513012007 Analysis Year 2010 Build Out Conditions Analysis Time Period AM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A East/West Street: Site Drivewa # 2 North/South Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South IStudy Period hrs : 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 24 473 801 40 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 27 537 0 0 910 45 Percent Heavy Vehicles 25 — — 7 — — Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 22 5 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 25 0 5 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 25 0 25 7 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 27 30 C (m) (veh/h) 635 248 v/c 0.04 0.12 95% queue length 0.13 0.41 Control Delay (s/veh) 10.9 21.5 LOS B C Approach Delay -- -- 21.5 file: //C: \Documents and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Temp\u2kl9DE.tmp 5/30/2007 I ..., , . w.1 - r 100 100 --0- - -- - neral Information TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY Site Information HRA Intersection HRAJurisdiction /30/2007 nalvsis Year Analyst P genc /Co. P Date Performed 05 Analysis Time Period PM Peak Project Description 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario A East/West Street: Site Driveway# 2 IN Street: Route 11 Intersection Orientation: North -South Stud Period (hrs): 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments e Dr # 21Route 11 ,derick County, VA 10 Build Out Conditions Major Street Northbound Southbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 13 914 573 22 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 14 1038 0 0 651 25 Percent Heav Vehicles 25 — — 7 — — y Median Type Two Way Left Tum Lane RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 1 0 0 1 1 Configuration L T T R Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume (veh/h) 57 12 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.88 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR (veh/h) 64 0 13 0 0 0 Percent Heavy Vehicles 25 0 25 7 0 0 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach y N Storage 2 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 Configuration LR Delay, Queue Len th, and Level of Service Approach Northbound Southbound Westbound Eastbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration L LR v (veh/h) 14 77 C (m) (veh/h) 817 324 v/c 0.02 0.24 95% queue length 0.05 0.91 Control Delay (s/veh) 9.5 21.0 LOS A C Approach Delay -- — 21.0 file: //C:\Documents and Settings\Andurlelcar\Local Sett111gs\Temp\u2k19E2.tmp 5/30/2007 L LJLCLLlVu 1\VtJ V1L 1 ap, 1 V1 L 10• 00 HCS+" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period AM Peak Intersection Rt 11 & Site -Drive #2 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 1 1 1 Lane Group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 30 6 93 484 817 155 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, li 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 1 1 J3.0 J3.0 1 1 3.0 11.000 3.0 .Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1 1 11.000 11.000 1 1 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 21.0 G= G= G= G= 57.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 41 106 538 928 176 Lane Group Capacity, c 404 184 1168 1168 1568 v/c Ratio, X 0.10 0.58 0.46 0.79 0.11 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.23 0.63 0.63 0.63 1.00 Uniform Delay, di 27.1 9.5 8.5 12.2 0.0 Progression Factor, PF 1 11.000 1 1 1 1 11.000 11.000 1 1 11.000 10.950 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.17 0.11 0.34 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.1 4.4 0.3 3.9 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 file://C:\Documcnts and Settings\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Temp\s2k1AC1.tmp 5/30/2007 HCS+'" DETAILED REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst - PHRA Agency or Co. PHRA Date Performed 0511612007 Time Period PM Peak Intersection Rt 11 & Site -Drive #2 Area Type All other areas Jurisdiction Frederick County, VA Analysis Year 2010 Build -out Conditions Project ID 1-81 Distribution Center - Scenario B Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT I TH RT Number of Lanes, Ni 0 0 1 1 1 1 Lane Group LR L T T R Volume, V (vph) 189 40 17 930 614 28 % Heavy Vehicles, %HV 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 Peak -Hour Factor, PHF 0.88 0.88 0.88 0.90 1 0.88 0.88 Pretimed (P) or Actuated (A) A A A A A A Start-up Lost Time, H 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Extension of Effective Green, e 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Arrival Type, AT 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension, UE 3.0 13.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Filtering/Metering, 1 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Initial Unmet Demand, Qb 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Ped / Bike / RTOR Volumes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking / Grade / Parking N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N Parking Maneuvers, Nm -01 Buses Stopping, NB 0 0 0 0 Min. Time for Pedestrians, GP 3.2 3.2 3.2 Phasing EB Only 02 03 04 NS Perm 06 07 08 Timing G= 25.0 G= G= G= G= 53.0 G= G= G= Y= 6 Y= Y= Y= IY= 6 Y= Y= Y= Duration of Analysis, T = 0.25 Cycle Length, C = 90.0 Lane Group Capacity, Control Delay, and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Adjusted Flow Rate, v 260 19 1033 698 32 Lane Group Capacity, c 481 291 1086 1086 1568 v/c Ratio, X 0.54 0.07 0.95 0.64 0.02 Total Green Ratio, g/C 0.28 0.59 0.59 0.59 1.00 Uniform Delay, di 27.6 7.9 17.3 12.2 0.0 Progression Factor, PF 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.950 Delay Calibration, k 0.14 0.11 0.46 0.22 10.11 Incremental Delay, d2 1.2 0.1 16.9 1.3 0.0 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 file: HC:\D ocuments and Setdngs\Andurlekar\Local Settings\Temp\s2k1AD2.tmp 5/30/2007 0 0 Delay Calibration, k 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.27 0.45 0.11 0.22 0.11 0.11 Incremental Delay, d2 0.7 0.1 0.7 0.4 0.1 5.7 15.6 0.1 14.2 0.4 0.2 Initial Queue Delay, d3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Control Delay 24.9 22.2 25.3 24.0 22.4 20.3 34.1 9.6 28.0 12.6 10.9 Lane Group LOS C C C C C C C A C 8 8 Approach Delay 24.7 23.5 29.3 13.1 Approach LOS C C C 8 Intersection Delay 23.4 Xc = 0.75 Intersection LOS C Copyright © 2005 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved HCS+TM Version 5.21 Generated: 5/30/2007 3:10 PM file: //CAD ocuments and Settings\AndurlelcarEocal Settings\Temp\s2k1AB0.tmp 5/30/2007 • 0 Traffic Counts 0 Intersection: E-W; 1HOPEWELL RD Weather Dry N-S: 1-81 RAMP Count ByjJJP Location CLEAR BROOK VA Count Date 5142006 15 Minute EB: HOPEWELL RD WB: HOPEWELL RD NB: 1 Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left 7:00 5 8 0 13 0 9 6 15 2 7:15 4 12 0 16 0 13 8 21 4 7:30 4 11 0 15 0 12 8 20 3 7:45 3 12 0 15 0 15 9 24 4 8:00 5 13 0 18 0 17 12 29 4 8:15 6 12 0 18 0 19 8 27 6 8:30 4 14 0 18 0 14 6 20 8 8:45 4 15 0 19 0 17 8 25 6 A.M. Total 35 97 0 132 0 116 65 181 37 16:00 4 16 0 20 0 33 18 51 8 16:15 5 16 0 21 0 31 16 47 7 16:30 7 14 0 21 0 34 16 50 11 16:45 11 13 0 24 0 33 15 48 12 17:00 9 12 0 21 0 34 12 46 12 17:15 10 9 0 19 0 29 10 39 15 17:30 9 7 0 16 0 23 9 32 14 17:45 8 8 0 16 0 25 6 31 12 P.M. Total 63 95 0 158 0 242 102 344 91 I Hour EB: HOPEWELL RD WB: HOPEWELL RD NB: Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thor Right Total Left 7:00 16 43 0 59 0 49 31 80 13 7:15 16 48 0 64 0 57 37 94 15 7:30 18 48 0 66 0 63 37 100 17 7:45 18 51 0 69 0 65 35 100 22 8:00 19 54 0 73 0 67 34 101 24 16:00 27 59 0 86 0 131 65 196 38 16:15 32 55 0 87 0 132 59 191 42 16:30 37 48 0 85 0 130 53 183 50 16:45 39 41 0 80 0 119 46 165 53 17:00 36 36 0 72 0 111 37 149 53 I Hour EB: HOPEWELL RD WB: HOPEWELL RD NB: Period Begining Left T6 Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left 8:00 19 54 0 73 0 67 34 101 24 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.96 PHF = 0.87 16:00 27 59 0 86 0 131 65 196 38 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.90 PHF = 0.96 0 Intersection: E-W: IREST CHURCH Weather DRY File Name N-S: 1-81 RAMP Count ByjJJP input Byj1JP Location VA Count Date 5/32006 15 Minute EB: REST CHURCH WB: REST CHURCH NB: SB: 1-81 RAMP 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thor Right Total Left Thou Right Total Left Thor Right Total Left Thor Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 23 29 52 43 30 0 73 U U U 0 7 0 17 24 149 7:00 7:15 0 26 34 60 48 29 0 77 U U U U 12 0 19 31 168 7:15 7:30 0 33 40 73 45 33 0 78 0 0 0 0 9 0 21 30 181 7:30 7:45 0 27 44 71 44 34 0 78 U 0 0 U 11 0 20 31 180 7:45 8:00 0 29 42 71 46 35 U 81 U 0 0 0 14 0 23 37 189 8:00 8:15 0 34 39 73 36 31 0 67 0 0 0 U 16 0 21 37 177 8:15 8:30 0 36 44 80 32 27 0 59 0 0 U 0 12 0 18 30 169 9:30 8:45 0 34 37 71 29 28 U 57 U 0 0 0 14 0 19 33 161 8:45 A.M. Total 0 242 309 551 323 247 0 570 0 U 0 0 95 U 158 253 1374 A.M. Total 16:00 0 44 30 74 14 56 0 70 0 0 0 0 9 0 24 33 177 16:00 16:15 0 41 33 74 14 58 0 72 U 0 U 0 7 0 20 27 173 16:15 16:30 0 42 31 73 17 63 0 80 0 0 0 U 9 0 26 35 188 16:30 16:45 0 49 34 83 23 69 0 92 0 0 0 U 8 0 29 37 212 16:45 17:00 0 51 38 89 21 54 0 75 0 0 0 0 11 0 34 45 209 17:00 17:15 0 44 32 76 24 42 0 66 0 0 0 0 6 0 27 33 175 17:15 17:30 0 35 26 61 20 31 0 51 0 0 U 0 7 0 21 28 140 17:30 17:45 0 32 27 59 18 27 0 45 0 0 0 U 5 0 22 27 131 17:45 P.M. Total 0 338 251 589 151 400 0 551 U 0 0 0 62 0 203 265 t405 P.M. Total 1 Hour EB: REST CHURCH WB: REST CHURCH NB: SB: 1-81 RAMP 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 0 109 147 256 180 126 0 306 0 0 0 0 39 0 77 116 678 7:00 7:15 0 115 160 275 183 131 0 314 0 0 0 0 46 0 83 129 718 7:15 7:30 0 123 165 288 171 133 0 304 0 0 0 0 50 0 85 135 727 7:30 7:45 0 126 169 295 158 127 0 285 0 U 0 0 53 0 82 135 715 7:45 8:00 0 133 162 295 143 121 0 264 U U 0 0 56 0 81 137 696 8:00 16:00 0 176 128 304 68 246 0 314 0 0 0 0 33 0 99 132 750 16:00 16:15 0 183 136 319 75 244 U 319 0 0 0 0 35 0 109 144 782 16:15 16:30 0 186 135 321 85 228 0 313 0 0 0 U 34 0 116 150 784 16:30 16:45 0 179 130 309 88 196 0 284 0 U U 0 32 0 ill 143 736 16:45 17:00 0 162 123 285 83 154 0 237 0 0 0 0 29 0 IN 133 655 17:00 I Hour EB: REST CHURCH WB: REST CHURCH NB: SB: 1-81 RAMP I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thm Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:30 0 123 165 288 171 133 U 304 0 0 0 0 50 0 85 135 727 7:30 A.M. Peak PHF, = 0.99 PHF = 0.94 PHF = PHF = 0.91 0.96 A.M. Peak 16:30 0 186 135 321 85 228 U 313 0 0 0 U 34 U 116 150 784 16:30 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.90 PHF = 0.85 PHF = PHF = 0.83 0.92 P.M. Peak 0 0 Intersection: E-W: Ho ewell Road/Brucetown Road Weather Dry N-S: Route 11 Count ByJSD Location IClearbrook, VA Count Date 8292005 File Name Input By ISID 15 Minute EB: Hopewell Road WB: Brucetown Road NB: Route 11 SB: Route 11 15 Min. Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total IS& W Begining 7:00 23 18 17 58 22 13 19 54 12 41 16 69- 5 59 38 102 283 7:00 7:15 16 15 22 53 14 8 16 38 17 39 15 71 1 53 27 81 243 7:15 7:30 16 11 8 35 6 11 14 31 5 30 9 44 3 55 31 89 199 7:30 7:45 13 10 5 28 12 7 13 32 8 31 12 51 2 41 24 67 178 7:45 8:00 11 8 4 23 15 8 18 41 13 29 17 59 6 42 32 8o 203 8:00 8:15 9 12 to 31 9 5 11 25 11 26 13 50 6 33 25 64 170 8:15 8:30 14 9 22 45 7 11 6 24 12 29 9 50 4 40 15 59 179 8:30 8:45 10 7 18 35 5 8 3 16 15 34 12 61 5 37 17 . 59 171 8:45 9:00 U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 9:00 9:15 U U 0 0 U U U U U U U U U U U U 0 9:15 9:30 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 9:45 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 A.M. Total 112 90 106 308 90 71 IOU 261 93 259 103 455 32 360 209 6U1 1625 A.M. Total 16:00 18 11 5 34 12 9 13 34 17 58 16 91 6 32 12 50 209 16:U0 16:15 17 11 12 40 14 10 17 41 21 61 14 96 8 39 21 68 245 16:15 16:30 14 8 12 34 14 11 8 33 19 76 17 112 9 34 37 8o 259 16:30 16:45 10 6 16 32 8 11 9 28 26 69 19 114 14 37 33 84 258 16:45 17:00 13 8 13 34 16 14 13 43 22 58 22 102 10 45 29 84 263 17:00 17:15 11 7 9 27 10 9 10 29 25 53 26 104 8 36 30 74 234 17:15 17:30 14 8 14 36 8 7 6 21 19 57 21 97 8 32 23 63 217 17:30 17:45 13 8 10 31 7 5 5 17 22 52 23 97 10 35 26 71 216 17:45 18:00 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 19:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:15 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 18:30 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:45 P.M. Total 110 67 91 268 89 76 81 246 171 484 158 813 73 290 211 574 1901 P.M. Total I Hour EB: Hopewell Road WB: Brucetown Road NB: Route 11 SB: Route I 1 I Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thou Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 68 54 52 174 54 39 62 155 42 141 52 235 11 208 120 339 903 7:00 7:15 56 44 39 139 47 34 61 142 43 129 53 225 12 191 114 317 823 7:15 7:30 49 41 27 117 42 31 56 129 37 116 51 204 17 171 112 300 750 7:30 7:45 47 39 41 127 43 31 48 122 44 115 51 210 18 156 96 270 729 7:45 8:00 44 36 54 134 36 32 38 106 51 118 51 220 21 152 89 262 722 8:00 8:15 33 28 50 111 21 24 20 65 38 89 34 161 15 110 57 t82 519 8:15 8:30 24 16 40 80 12 19 9 40 27 63 21 111 9 77 32 118 349 8:30 8:45 10 7 18 35 5 8 3 16 15 34 12 61 5 37 17 59 171 8:45 9:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:00 16:00 59 36 45 140 48 41 47 136 83 264 66 413 37 142 103 282 971 16:00 16:15 54 33 53 140 52 46 47 145 88 264 72 424 41 155 120 316 1025 16:15 16:30 48 29 50 127 48 45 40 133 92 256 84 432 41 152 129 322 1014 16:30 16:45 48 29 52 129 42 41 38 121 92 237 88 417 40 150 115 305 972 16:45 17:00 51 31 46 128 41 35 34 110 88 220 92 400 36 148 108 292 930 17:00 17:15 38 23 33 94 25 21 21 67 66 162 70 298 26 103 79 208 667 17:15 17:30 27 16 24 67 15 12 11 38 41 109 44 194 l8 67 49 134 433 17:30 17:45 13 8 10 31 7 5 5 17 22 52 23 97 10 35 26 71 216 17:45 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 1 Hour EB: Hopewell Road WB: Brucetown Road NB: Route 11 SB: Route t l 1 Hour Period N,S, Period Begining Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total Left Thru Right Total E & W Begining 7:00 68 54 52 174 54 39 62 155 42 141 52 235 11 208 120 339 903 7:00 A.M. Peak PHF = 0.75 PHF = 0.72 PHF = 0.83 PHF = 0.93 0.80 A.M. Peak 16:15 54 33 53 140 52 46 47 145 88 264 72 424 41 155 120 316 1025 16:15 P.M. Peak PHF = 0.88 PHF = 0.84 PHF = 0.93 PHF = 0.94 0.97 P.M. Peak APPENDIX SYNCHRO Worksheets 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour Lane Group ^ . EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + 4, T Volume (vph) 137 64 171 64 46 74 153 387 62 13 651 171 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.938 0.946 0.979 0.969 Fit Protected 0.982 0.983 0,950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1620 0 0 1628 0 1687 1738 0 1687 1721 0 Fit Permitted 0.982 0.983 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1620 0 0 1628 0 1687 1738 0 1687 1721 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 152 71 190 71 51 82 170 430 69 14 723 190 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 413 0 0 204 0 170 499 0 14 913 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free ntersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour Jane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations �r Volume (vph) 0 77 33 121 83 0 0 0 0 152 0 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.984 Flt Protected 0.971 0.958 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1678 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Flt Permitted 0.971 0.958 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1678 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 86 37 134 92 0 0 0 0 169 0 22 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop intersec.- ti-on --Summary--- - --- - .. . ..... .. ...-- -.. -- ---- --- ..... - --_-... .--- - - ..-- ---- _- - - -- - _-- Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour Lane Group . . _. -... EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 't 4� Volume (vph) 22 207 0 0 176 187 28 0 158 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.930 0.885 Flt Protected 0.995 0.993 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1759 0 0 1651 0 0 1491 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.995 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1759 0 0 1651 0 0 1491 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 24 230 0 0 196 208 31 0 176 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 254 0 0 404 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Conditions AM Peak Hour -.4 --►, �r f- 4--- 4- bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL 1NBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r '� tt r t r '� t r Volume (vph) 154 268 231 10 80 10 102 209 33 33 548 278 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.302 0.613 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 563 1776 1583 1142 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 257 11 37 309 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 284 334 4320 539 Travel Time (s) 6.5 7.6 98.2 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 171 298 257 11 89 11 113 232 37 37 609 309 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 298 257 11 89 11 113 232 37 37 609 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 E 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 14: Route 11 & AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL ­ EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 20.0 20.0 17.0 25.0 25.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 22.2% 22.2% 18.9% 27.8% 27.8% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 19.0 19.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 21.5 21.5 6.4 11.5 11.5 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 vlc Ratio 0.50 0.67 0.45 0.09 0.20 0.05 0.34 0.22 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.29 Control Delay 41.2 37.8 8.6 40.4 34.3 16.5 13.8 9.7 3.5 9.0 14.6 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.2 40.5 8.8 40.4 34.3 16.5 13.8 9.7 3.5 9.0 14.6 2.0 LOS D D A D C B B A A A B A Approach Delay 29.4 33.2 10.3 10.3 Approach LOS C C B B 90th %ile Green (s) 6.0 17.7 17.7 7.3 19.0 19.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 6.0 24.1 24.1 0.0 12.1 12.1 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 70th %ile Term Code Max Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 6.0 22.5 22.5 0.0 10.5 10.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 50th %ile Term Code Max Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 6.0 21.9 21.9 0.0 9.9 9.9 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 30th %ile Term Code Max Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Skip Skip Skip Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 53 157 9 6 24 0 28 53 0 8 184 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #102 #281 80 22 42 14 81 112 14 25 357 38 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 4240 459 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity(vph) 344 444 573 216 747 343 337 1063 962 684 1063 1072 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 67 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.50 0.79 0.49 0.05 0.12 0.03 0.34 0.22 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.29 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 0 CJ 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 14: Route 11 & AM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & 't o2 1' 03 -"► o4 53s 17s 20s 06 112s "� o7 08 53 s 25 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour --* - --* ice - 4- 41 I 41 Cane Group - EBC EBT EBR WBL- WBT -WBR NBL NBT NBR .. SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r Vi tt 4 r Volume (vph) 0 216 189 282 185 0 0 0 0 236 0 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Fit Permitted 0.511 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 952 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 210 109 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 240 210 313 206 0 0 0 0 262 0 109 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 240 210 313 206 0 0 0 0 0 262 109 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perrr Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 35.6% 65.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 21.0 26.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 33.4 33.4 53.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.59 0.59 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.38 0.46 0.11 0.53 0.28 Control Delay 21.0 5.6 17.1 8.7 32.3 7.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.0 5.6 17.1 8.7 32.3 7.3 LOS C A B A C A Approach Delay 13.8 13.7 24.9 Approach LOS B B C 90th %ile Green (s) 28.7 28.7 18.3 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 31.7 31.7 15.3 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 33.6 33.6 13.4 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 35.4 35.4 11.6 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 37.6 37.6 9.4 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 0 89 30 126 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 83 50 177 38 203 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 1080 551 797 1801 492 392 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.38 0.39 0.11 0.53 0.28 )ntersection Summary I Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 its and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off 2122/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi tt tt r 4 r Volume (vph) 84 368 0 0 327 134 140 0 284 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.451 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 599 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 149 316 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 93 409 0 0 363 149 156 0 316 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 409 0 0 363 149 0 156 316 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 10 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour EBL EBT_ EBR WBL WBT MR NBL NBT NBR SBL ` SBT ____.sBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 36.6 36.6 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.21 0.25 0.20 0.38 0.44 Control Delay 11.1 10.6 20.8 6.3 27.0 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.1 10.7 20.8 6.3 27.0 4.9 LOS B B C A C A Approach Delay 10.7 16.6 12.2 Approach LOS B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 11.9 49.0 31.1 31.1 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 10.0 49.0 33.0 33.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 8.7 49.0 34.3 34.3 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 76 69 2 68 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 107 117 48 123 56 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 451 1927 1439 732 407 724 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 140 0 0 0 12 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.20 0.38 0.44 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.44 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & " o2 � 08 55 s I# m5 06 23 s I FA32 s V 35 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 12 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 41� T# Volume (vph) 112 49 251 62 55 56 274 834 86 49 474 172 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.918 0.956 0.986 0.960 Flt Protected 0.987 0.982 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1598 0 0 1638 0 1687 1751 0 1687 1705 0 Flt Permitted 0.987 0.982 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1598 0 0 1638 0 1687 1751 0 1687 1705 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 124 54 279 69 61 62 304 927 96 54 527 191 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 457 0 0 192 0 304 1023 0 54 718 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free ntersection Summary j Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT MR- NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT S139 Lane Configurations T3, *T Volume (vph) 0 63 28 124 139 0 0 0 0 238 0 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.981 Flt Protected 0.977 0.959 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1697 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Flt Permitted 0.977 0.959 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1697 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 70 31 138 154 0 0 0 0 264 0 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 101 0 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 308 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 43.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour 4 I 1 ane Group EBL EBT EBR .. WBL WBT MR- NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 T 4� Volume (vph) 39 262 0 0 219 271 44 0 142 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.925 0.897 Flt Protected 0.994 0.988 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1754 0 0 1643 0 0 1503 0 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.994 0.988 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1754 0 0 1643 0 0 1503 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 43 291 0 0 243 301 49 0 158 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 334 0 0 544 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop -- .. _. - --. Intersect..ion-- S-ummary _- -- -- - - - -- -.. _ .- -- --.. ..-.... -- - -_- .._.._ .__ -- - - - - -- j Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Condiitons PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r '� tt r t r '� t r Volume (vph) 370 208 86 47 375 47 224 753 26 26 359 164 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.445 0.090 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 829 1776 1583 168 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 96 52 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 284 334 4320 539 Travel Time (s) 6.5 7.6 98.2 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 411 231 96 52 417 52 249 837 29 29 399 182 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 411 231 96 52 417 52 249 837 29 29 399 182 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Condiitons PM Peak Hour ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBIR Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 20.0 20.0 17.0 18.0 18.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 21.1 % 22.2% 22.2% 18.9% 20.0% 20.0% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.8 21.8 21.8 8.2 12.1 12.1 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.51 0.21 0.32 0.87 0.20 0.58 0.90 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Control Delay 55.9 35.0 11.2 43.0 58.9 12.5 21.3 34.6 5.9 25.2 15.1 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.9 35.1 11.2 43.0 58.9 12.5 21.3 34.6 5.9 25.2 15.1 2.3 LOS E D B D E B C C A C B A Approach Delay 43.6 52.7 30.9 11.8 Approach LOS D D C B 90th %ile Green (s) 13.0 14.1 14.1 10.9 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 13.0 15.8 15.8 9.2 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 13.0 17.0 17.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 13.0 31.0 31.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 30th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 12.2 30.9 30.9 0.0 12.7 12.7 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 125 97 0 28 124 0 92 407 2 9 132 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 #238 27 62 #207 32 174 #670 15 36 203 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 4240 459 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity(vph) 496 451 456 216 477 258 433 927 836 88 927 914 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.83 0.53 0.21 0.24 0.87 0.20 0.58 0.90 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 • 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Condiitons PM Peak Hour o2 o3 -711" o4 53s 17s 20s 1 06 1#07 08 53s 19s .,= 18s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour - - EBl EBT EBR --WBL WBT 1NBR NBL NBT NBR SBt SBT .SBR Lane Configurations tt r '� tt Volume (vph) 0 308 155 331 291 0 0 0 0 156 0 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Flt Permitted 0.452 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 842 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 172 148 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 342 172 368 323 0 0 0 0 173 0 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 342 172 368 323 0 0 0 0 0 173 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 35.6% 65.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 21.0 26.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 31.6 31.6 53.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.33 0.34 0.56 0.18 0.35 0.35 Control Delay 23.7 6.0 25.6 10.5 28.5 7.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.7 6.0 25.6 10.5 28.5 7.1 LOS C A C B C A Approach Delay 17.8 18.5 18.7 Approach LOS B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 26.0 26.0 21.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 29.6 29.6 17.4 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 31.8 31.8 15.2 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 33.9 33.9 13.1 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 36.5 36.5 10.5 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 74 0 138 43 79 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 122 47 261 82 136 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 1021 507 764 1801 492 421 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.33 0.34 0.48 0.18 0.35 0.35 ... Intersection S ummary - --- _ . __ . .. __..._-..._ ... -.. "_ --- ....-.._ . _. .. . .._ .. ____ ........ ....... ..._. .-.- _._... ..-.___ .....-- - ..._ I Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp 01" 02 04 32 s I r.127 s 31 s 41— 06 59 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NIL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r 4 if Volume (vph) 148 316 0 0 489 274 132 0 348 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.315 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 419 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 304 387 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 164 351 0 0 543 304 147 0 387 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 351 0 0 543 304 0 147 387 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 10 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour ane Group -__EB._- -L_ -__ . B__T__ _.. E _ EBR_...._ . _....... -_. WBL __W--._BT--- - WBR......_._. NBL_.__ .--__.. _.NBT-.--_... _ _.NBR --- SBL_. _.__ SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1% 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 31.2 31.2 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.18 0.44 0.41 0.36 0.50 Control Delay 26.4 10.9 30.2 11.1 26.6 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.4 11.0 31.0 11.5 26.6 5.0 LOS C B C B C A Approach Delay 15.9 24.0 11.0 Approach LOS B C B 90th %ile Green (s) 16.5 49.0 26.5 26.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 13.5 49.0 29.5 29.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 11.6 49.0 31.4 31.4 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 9.8 49.0 33.2 33.2 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 49 121 25 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 139 91 m162 m61 117 62 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 387 1927 1228 748 407 772 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 386 143 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 42 0 0 0 4 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.42 0.19 0.64 0.50 0.36 0.50 Intersection Summary a Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Condiitons 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & o2 �� o$ 55 s 05 06 23 s 1 1-132 s 35 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 12 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour_wl improvements --* -� --v 'r '- *-- t �► 1 LineGroup---. - _._ .__._ EBL EBT EBR WBL W6f-,-..WBR NBL- NBT NBR SBL SBT ---'Sbk Lane Configurations *' r +T r T T Volume (vph) 137 64 171 64 46 74 153 387 62 13 651 171 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.979 0.969 Fit Protected 0.967 0.972 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1687 1509 0 1686 1509 1687 1738 0 1687 1721 0 Fit Permitted 0.722 0.576 0.170 0.428 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1260 1509 0 999 1509 302 1738 0 760 1721 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 190 82 16 26 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 152 71 190 71 51 82 170 430 69 14 723 190 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 223 190 0 122 82 170 499 0 14 913 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour_wl improvements ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 60.0 60.0 0.0 60.0 60.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% 66.7% 66.7% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.1 19.1 19.1 19.1 54.2 54.2 54.2 54.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.64 vlc Ratio 0.79 0.39 0.55 0.20 0.89 0.45 0.03 0.83 Control Delay 51.5 6.7 38.7 7.6 61.9 10.0 7.4 21.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 51.5 6.7 38.7 7.6 61.9 10.0 7.4 21.3 LOS D A D A E B A C Approach Delay 30.9 26.2 23.2 21.1 Approach LOS C C C C 90th %ile Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Max Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Max Max Max 50th %ile Green (s) 20.4 20.4 20.4 20.4 20.4 20.4 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Max Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 16.5 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Max Hold Hold 10th %ile Green (s) 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 11.6 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Max Hold Hold Queue Length 50th (ft) 113 0 58 0 72 123 3 345 Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 50 113 33 #220 215 11 #691 Internal Link Dist (ft) 977 2034 781 8818 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 356 562 282 485 192 1109 483 1102 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.63 0.34 0.43 0.17 0.89 0.45 0.03 0.83 ntersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 85.3 Natural Cycle: 90 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 • • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour_wl improvements Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 86.4 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 82.5 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 77.6 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: Hopewell Road & 1 o2 -* o4 60 s 30 s 06 08 60 s I V 30 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements arie Group EBl EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBI NBT NBR SBL SBT tiM Lane Configurations +T+ Volume (vph) 0 77 33 121 83 0 0 0 0 152 0 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.984 Fit Protected 0.971 0.958 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1678 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Fit Permitted 0.748 0.958 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1292 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 37 7 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 86 37 134 92 0 0 0 0 169 0 22 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 0 0 226 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour_wl improvements � -� � f- 4--- 4�- 4\ EBL --EBT-_,..-EBR WBL -" V1IBT WBR NBt NBT NBR SBL._ SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 63.0 0.0 63.0 63.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 27.0 27.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 70.0% 0.0% 70.0% 70.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 57.0 57.0 57.0 21.0 21.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 12.0 10.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.50 0.40 Control Delay 6.6 13.2 13.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.6 13.2 13.2 LOS A B B Approach Delay 6.6 13.2 13.2 Approach LOS A B B 90th %ile Green (s) 18.2 18.2 18.2 12.9 12.9 90th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 70th %ile Green (s) 13.9 13.9 13.9 10.4 10.4 70th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 11.5 11.5 11.5 9.0 9.0 50th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 9.6 9.6 9.6 7.9 7.9 30th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 7.9 7.9 7.9 11.5 11.5 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Dwell Dwell Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 29 25 Queue Length 95th (ft) 34 78 76 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1369 590 634 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1703 1292 992 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.17 0.19 tersect_ion.. S- u- mmary --..-..... _. .. In . -_...._..._.. ..... -. - --- _ .. __ - - -- -- -- _ -_ _-...-.._.._ .-._ _ __. - .- - _,., I Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 34.6 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.7 Intersection LOS: B 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 90th Ve Actuated Cycle: 43.1 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 36.3 50th %Ile Actuated Cycle: 32.5 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 29.5 10th %Ile Actuated Cycle: 31.4 Splits and Phases: 8: SB ON Ramp & --I' o2 I o4 63s 27s i— 06 63 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements --* -� "fir f- '- 4- 4\ t �' ► �: 41 Lane Group ., ...... -.- -__ _ ...- 1ii _. ... EBT ^ EBR WBL. _...--WBT WBR..... NBL_- .. NBT ... _ NBR SBL ._. $Bf ..._ ...SBR Lane Configurations *' T +T+ Volume (vph) 22 207 0 0 176 187 28 0 158 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.930 0.885 Fit Protected 0.995 0.993 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1759 0 0 1651 0 0 1491 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.995 0.993 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1759 0 0 1651 0 0 1491 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 24 230 0 0 196 208 31 0 176 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 254 0 0 404 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 i 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 14: Route 11 & AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Lane Configurations r '� tt r t r '� t r Volume (vph) 154 268 231 10 80 10 102 209 33 33 548 278 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.302 0.613 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 563 1776 1583 1142 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 257 11 37 309 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 284 334 4320 539 Travel Time (s) 6.5 7.6 98.2 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 171 298 257 11 89 11 113 232 37 37 609 309 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 298 257 11 89 11 113 232 37 37 609 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 14: Route 11 & AM Peak Hour_wl improvements -'4 -• --* 'r 4--- 4\ \40. j 41 bane Group EBL ' EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 20.0 20.0 17.0 25.0 25.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 22.2% 22.2% 18.9% 27.8% 27.8% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 19.0 19.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 9.0 21.5 21.5 6.4 11.5 11.5 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.24 0.24 0.07 0.13 0.13 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 0.60 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.67 0.45 0.09 0.20 0.05 0.34 0.22 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.29 Control Delay 41.2 37.8 8.6 40.4 34.3 16.5 13.8 9.7 3.5 9.0 14.6 2.0 Queue Delay 0.0 2.7 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.2 40.5 8.8 40.4 34.3 16.5 13.8 9.7 3.5 9.0 14.6 2.0 LOS D D A D C B B A A A B A Approach Delay 29.4 33.2 10.3 10.3 Approach LOS C C B B 90th %ile Green (s) 6.0 17.7 17.7 7.3 19.0 19.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 6.0 24.1 24.1 0.0 12.1 12.1 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 53.9 70th %ile Term Code Max Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 6.0 22.5 22.5 0.0 10.5 10.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 55.5 50th %ile Term Code Max Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 6.0 21.9 21.9 0.0 9.9 9.9 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 56.1 30th %ile Term Code Max Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Skip Skip Skip Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 53 157 9 6 24 0 28 53 0 8 184 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #102 #281 80 22 42 14 81 112 14 25 357 38 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 4240 459 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity(vph) 344 444 573 216 747 343 337 1063 962 684 1063 1072 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 67 51 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.79 0.49 0.05 0.12 0.03 0.34 0.22 0.04 0.05 0.57 0.29 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & Natural Cycle: 60 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.67 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 63.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Conditions AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements o2 1' 03 " o4 53s I 317s 20s 06 o7 08 53s 12s 1 025 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page10 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_wl improvements Lane Group EBL EBT EBR VUBL VUBT WBR T NBC ^ NBT NBR SBl SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r ►� tt Volume (vph) 0 216 189 282 185 0 0 0 0 236 0 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 At Permitted 0.511 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 952 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 210 109 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 240 210 313 206 0 0 0 0 262 0 109 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 240 210 313 206 0 0 0 0 0 262 109 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_wl improvements -.4 -,, --* f- '- *,- 4\ t 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 35.6% 65.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 21.0 26.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 33.4 33.4 53.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.37 0.37 0.59 0.59 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.38 0.46 0.11 0.53 0.28 Control Delay 21.0 5.6 17.1 8.7 32.3 7.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 21.0 5.6 17.1 8.7 32.3 7.3 LOS C A B A C A Approach Delay 13.8 13.7 24.9 Approach LOS B B C 90th %ile Green (s) 28.7 28.7 18.3 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 31.7 31.7 15.3 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 33.6 33.6 13.4 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 35.4 35.4 11.6 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 37.6 37.6 9.4 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 48 0 89 30 126 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 83 50 177 38 203 39 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 1080 551 797 1801 492 392 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.22 0.38 0.39 0.11 0.53 0.28 Intersection Summary _....._ _...... .. _ .....- ._.._ ....1 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 12 i 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.9 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SIB Off Ramp 'tip 01 -711� 02 '* 04 32 s I r.,127 s 1 31 s 06 59 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 13 0 i 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & * AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements bane Group - EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r *T r Volume (vph) 84 368 0 0 327 134 140 0 284 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Fri: 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.451 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 599 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 149 316 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 93 409 0 0 363 149 156 0 316 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 409 0 0 363 149 0 156 316 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 14 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements -.* --0. 'r '- 4- t 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT -. SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1% 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 36.6 36.6 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.21 0.25 0.20 0.38 0.44 Control Delay 11.1 10.6 20.8 6.3 27.0 4.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 11.1 10.7 20.8 6.3 27.0 4.9 LOS B B C A C A Approach Delay 10.7 16.6 12.2 Approach LOS B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 11.9 49.0 31.1 31.1 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 10.0 49.0 33.0 33.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 8.7 49.0 34.3 34.3 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 33 76 69 2 68 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 63 107 117 48 123 56 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 451 1927 1439 732 407 724 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 140 0 0 0 12 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.23 0.25 0.20 0.38 0.44 Intersection Surma Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 15 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.44 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.2 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 55.4% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & "* o2 55 s 05 06 I 08 23 s 1 W132 s 35 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 16 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements lane Group _....._---...__. _.... EBL -EBT EBR _WBL . WBT MR NBL ---NBT -NBR SBL SBT Si3R Lane Configurations *' r r Volume (vph) 112 49 251 62 55 56 274 834 86 49 474 172 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.986 0.960 Fit Protected 0.966 0.974 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1687 1509 0 1685 1509 1687 1751 0 1687 1705 0 Fit Permitted 0.713 0.700 0.162 0.164 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1245 1509 0 1211 1509 288 1751 0 291 1705 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 279 62 13 33 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 124 54 279 69 61 62 304 927 96 54 527 191 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 178 279 0 130 62 304 1023 0 54 718 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Lane Group _.__ � ^� EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 12.0 68.0 0.0 56.0 56.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 24.4% 13.3% 75.6% 0.0% 62.2% 62.2% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 6.0 62.0 50.0 50.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 14.5 14.5 14.5 14.5 49.9 49.9 37.4 37.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.65 0.65 0.49 0.49 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.55 0.57 0.19 1.01 0.90 0.38 0.85 Control Delay 54.9 8.9 42.8 10.4 69.1 23.0 20.7 26.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 54.9 8.9 42.8 10.4 69.1 23.0 20.7 26.4 LOS D A D B E C C C Approach Delay 26.8 32.4 33.6 26.0 Approach LOS C C C C 90th %ile Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 6.0 62.0 50.0 50.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 6.0 62.0 50.0 50.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Hold Hold 50th %ile Green (s) 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 6.0 53.0 41.0 41.0 50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Gap Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 14.1 6.0 42.5 30.5 30.5 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Gap Hold Hold 10th %ile Green (s) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 6.0 32.3 20.3 20.3 10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Hold Gap Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 85 0 60 0 -63 371 16 277 Queue Length 95th (ft) #208 68 #139 34 #187 #628 46 428 Internal Link Dist (ft) 977 2034 781 8818 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 269 545 262 375 301 1420 197 1163 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.66 0.51 0.50 0.17 1.01 0.72 0.27 0.62 _.._._._...... ►ntersection Summary, ........... _. _ __ . _ _ _ . _ .. _. _ _..... - -- ._..- ___ .......... - I Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 76.8 Natural Cycle: 80 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay: 30.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 84.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 81 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 68.6 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 54.3 — Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: Hopewell Road & t o2 o4 68 s ' 22 s 4\ 05 06 08 1 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements --* -.10. -,* it I,- 4\ 41 bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ Volume (vph) 0 63 28 124 139 0 0 0 0 238 0 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.981 Fit Protected 0.977 0.959 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1697 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Flt Permitted 0.808 0.959 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1404 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 19 32 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 70 31 138 154 0 0 0 0 264 0 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 101 0 0 292 0 0 0 0 0 308 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements -.* -• ­-* 'r 4--- "L- 4\ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBF-� Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 13.0 0.0 13.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 77.0 77.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 14.4% 0.0% 14.4% 14.4% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 85.6% 85.6% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 71.0 71.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max C-Max Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 54.5 54.5 23.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.61 0.61 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.34 0.70 Control Delay 8.3 12.1 34.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 8.3 12.1 34.5 LOS A B C Approach Delay 8.3 12.1 34.5 Approach LOS A B C 90th %ile Green (s) 43.7 43.7 43.7 34.3 34.3 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Coord Gap Gap 70th %ile Green (s) 50.5 50.5 50.5 27.5 27.5 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Coord Gap Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 54.9 54.9 54.9 23.1 23.1 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Coord Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 59.0 59.0 59.0 19.0 19.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Coord Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 64.6 64.6 64.6 13.4 13.4 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Coord Gap Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 17 75 143 Queue Length 95th (ft) 52 169 194 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1369 590 634 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1040 851 1266 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.10 0.34 0.24 Intersection, Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 40 (44%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.70 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 • E 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 46.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 8: SB ON Ramp & --I" o2 1 o4 13s I 77s 06 13s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour_wl improvements --* --► -,v 'r ■-- * ~ 4\ t /,* "P. : 4/ ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations *' T 4 Volume (vph) 39 262 0 0 219 271 44 0 142 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.925 0.897 Fit Protected 0.994 0.988 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1754 0 0 1643 0 0 1503 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.994 0.988 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1754 0 0 1643 0 0 1503 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 43 291 0 0 243 301 49 0 158 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 334 0 0 544 0 0 207 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop _.. -Summa-- _ry..__.... Intersection . _ _ . _ - - ......... --- . _.. _ _.._ .._-- - -- .. _. I Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 64.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Conditions PM Peak Hour_wl improvements --,, 'r art-- ,- 4\ Lane Group _ EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r '� tt r t r '� t r Volume (vph) 370 208 86 47 375 47 224 753 26 26 359 164 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.445 0.090 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 829 1776 1583 168 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 96 52 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 284 334 4320 539 Travel Time (s) 6.5 7.6 98.2 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 411 231 96 52 417 52 249 837 29 29 399 182 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 411 231 96 52 417 52 249 837 29 29 399 182 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perrr Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 E 2122/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Conditions PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements A. 4\ I /0` Cane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL Wli WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBtZ Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 19.0 20.0 20.0 17.0 18.0 18.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 Total Split (%) 21.1% 22.2% 22.2% 18.9% 20.0% 20.0% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% 58.9% Maximum Green (s) 13.0 14.0 14.0 11.0 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.8 21.8 21.8 8.2 12.1 12.1 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.24 0.24 0.09 0.13 0.13 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.84 0.51 0.21 0.32 0.87 0.20 0.58 0.90 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Control Delay 55.9 35.0 11.2 43.0 58.9 12.5 21.3 34.6 5.9 25.2 15.1 2.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.9 35.1 11.2 43.0 58.9 12.5 21.3 34.6 5.9 25.2 15.1 2.3 LOS E D B D E B C C A C B A Approach Delay 43.6 52.7 30.9 11.8 Approach LOS D D C B 90th %ile Green (s) 13.0 14.1 14.1 10.9 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 13.0 15.8 15.8 9.2 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 13.0 17.0 17.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Gap Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 13.0 31.0 31.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 30th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 12.2 30.9 30.9 0.0 12.7 12.7 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 47.1 10th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 125 97 0 28 124 0 92 407 2 9 132 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #197 #238 27 62 #207 32 174 #670 15 36 203 30 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 4240 459 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity (vph) 496 451 456 216 477 258 433 927 836 88 927 914 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.83 0.53 0.21 0.24 0.87 0.20 0.58 0.90 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Intersection Summary ) Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & Natural Cycle: 80 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.9 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & 2010 Background Conditions PM Peak Hour_wl improvements I o2 f o3" o4 53s 17s 20s o6 J o7 08 53s 19s 18s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 10 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements + ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r '� tt + Volume (vph) 0 308 155 331 291 0 0 0 0 156 0 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Fit Permitted 0.452 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 842 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 172 148 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 342 172 368 323 0 0 0 0 173 0 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 342 172 368 323 0 0 0 0 0 173 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 1-81 Distribution Center 2010Backg0Und Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour W/improvmmonts 4� °� � �� \' | .� � l x *� � �n ---Wbf''Wbk'-- --KRf--_NBk-- --SbT- ' Detector Phase 2 2 1 8 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (o) 6.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 68 6.0 88 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 35.89& 05.8% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.4% 34.496 34.496 Maximum Green (s) 21.0 21.0 28.0 53.0 258 258 258 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 28 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Timo(s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 8.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Load Load'LogOptimizo? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (o) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C'Mox C'Max None C'Max Max Max Max AdEffct Greon(u) 31.8 31.6 0.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.59 0.59 0.28 028 wtRaUo 0.33 0.34 0.58 0.18 0.35 0.35 Control Delay 23.7 8.0 25.0 10.5 28.5 7.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 23.7 8.0 25.6 10.5 28.5 7.1 LOS C A C B C A Approach Delay 17.8 18.5 18.7 AppmaohLO8 B 8 B OOth%i|oGreen (u) 26.0 28.0 218 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 O0th%i|oTerm Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th%UoGreen (a) 20.6 20.6 174 53.0 25.0 25.0 26.0 7Oth%i|oTerm Code Cnnrd Coord Gap Coord MuxR MoxR MaxR SOth96i|oGreen (s) 31.8 31.8 15.2 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 5O(h%i|oTerm Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR WaxR 3Oth%i|oGreen (o) 33.9 33.9 13.1 510 25.0 25.0 25.0 3Oth%i|oTerm Code Coord Conrd Gap Coord MuxR MaxR MoxR 10th%UoGreen (o) 36.5 36.5 10.5 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 1Oth%i|oTerm Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MuxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 5Oth(00 74 O 138 43 70 U Queue Length 05th(;) 122 47 281 82 136 4E Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (0 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 1021 507 784 1801 402 421 Starvation Cap Roductn O O 0 O 0 C Gpi||buokCap Reductn O O O O U C Storage Cap Rodudn 0 0 U 0 O C Reduced NcRatio 0.33 0.34 048 0.18 0.35 0.3,r- Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 0O Offset: 63(70%),Referenced tophase 2:E8Tand 8:WBTL.Start o[Green 2/22/2008 Synom7'Report 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour _w/improvements Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.56 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp f 01 127s —70' m2 m4 32 s . 31 s +rt-- m6 9s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 13 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR - SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r Volume (vph) 148 316 0 0 489 274 132 0 348 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.315 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 419 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 304 387 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 164 351 0 0 543 304 147 0 387 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 351 0 0 543 304 0 147 387 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 14 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR M SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1% 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 31.2 31.2 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.32 vlc Ratio 0.48 0.18 0.44 0.41 0.36 0.50 Control Delay 26.4 10.9 30.2 11.1 26.6 5.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.4 11.0 31.0 11.5 26.6 5.0 LOS C B C B C A Approach Delay 15.9 24.0 11.0 Approach LOS B C B 90th %ile Green (s) 16.5 49.0 26.5 26.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 13.5 49.0 29.5 29.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 11.6 49.0 31.4 31.4 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 9.8 49.0 33.2 33.2 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 56 49 121 25 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 139 91 m162 m61 117 62 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 387 1927 1228 748 407 772 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 386 143 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 42 0 0 0 4 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.42 0.19 0.64 0.50 0.36 0.50 ntersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 15 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Background Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.50 Intersection Signal Delay:18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 51.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & o2 '� 08 55 s o5 06 23 s " 32 s 35 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 16 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour * bane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4+ T+ Volume (vph) 194 64 171 64 46 74 153 416 62 13 657 183 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.946 0.946 0.981 0.967 Fit Protected 0.978 0.983 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1629 0 0 1628 0 1687 1742 0 1687 1717 0 Fit Permitted 0.978 0.983 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1629 0 0 1628 0 1687 1742 0 1687 1717 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 216 71 190 71 51 82 170 462 69 14 730 203 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 477 0 0 204 0 170 531 0 14 933 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free -__- __ --- ntersection Summary - __ ...-...._------___ .... ......... _...-.- .. ...__ _..._ . _..- -- .._ .- ....__.. --- _.. -_.. .-_. Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour arie Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurationsi Volume (vph) 0 77 33 133 83 0 0 0 0 152 0 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.984 At Protected 0.970 0.958 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1674 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Flt Permitted 0.970 0.958 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1674 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 86 37 148 92 0 0 0 0 169 0 22 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 0 0 240 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop - Intersection Summary - - - - - - - - - __.._.._ _-- .... ___ _. .__ - -, I Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT MR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 1 4 Volume (vph) 22 207 0 0 188 187 28 0 215 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.933 0.880 Fit Protected 0.995 0.994 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1759 0 0 1657 0 0 1484 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.995 0.994 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1759 0 0 1657 0 0 1484 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 24 230 0 0 209 208 31 0 239 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 254 0 0 417 0 0 270 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersecti.on Summa_ .ry _ - ._ .....--- - - --- - _ __ - -_ ...... _ _ ... ......_ ... _.--... _... _.... ___ _. .. Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 • 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL sBT sm Lane Configurations t if Vi tt r Vi t r '� t r Volume (vph) 154 268 401 10 80 10 139 215 33 33 577 278 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.261 0.602 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 486 1776 1583 1121 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 440 11 37 279 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 284 334 3060 537 Travel Time (s) 6.5 7.6 69.5 12.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 171 298 446 11 89 11 154 239 37 37 641 309 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 171 298 446 11 89 11 154 239 37 37 641 309 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 E 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SM Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 20.0 20.0 25.0 18.0 18.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 22.2% 22.2% 27.8% 20.0% 20.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% 50.0% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 14.0 14.0 19.0 12.0 12.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.6 23.6 23.6 6.4 10.1 10.1 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 51.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.26 0.26 0.07 0.11 0.11 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.61 0.60 0.09 0.22 0.06 0.55 0.23 0.04 0.06 0.63 0.30 Control Delay 28.2 34.5 9.3 40.4 35.9 16.8 23.0 9.8 3.6 11.3 18.4 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 3.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.2 37.5 9.8 40.4 35.9 16.8 23.0 9.8 3.6 11.3 18.4 3.2 LOS C D A D D B C A A B B A Approach Delay 22.3 34.5 14.0 13.4 Approach LOS C C B B 90th %ile Green (s) 12.5 25.7 25.7 7.3 20.5 20.5 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Max Max Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 10.9 25.2 25.2 0.0 8.3 8.3 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 70th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 9.8 23.4 23.4 0.0 7.6 7.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 50th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 8.7 22.7 22.7 0.0 8.0 8.0 55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Skip Skip Skip Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 175 0 6 25 0 51 62 1 8 205 6 Queue Length 95th (ft) 57 243 146 22 41 14 #181 110 11 31 #513 57 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 2980 457 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity(vph) 802 489 740 374 539 251 279 1021 925 644 1021 1028 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 106 69 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.21 0.78 0.66 0.03 0.17 0.04 0.55 0.23 0.04 0.06 0.63 0.30 Intersection Surma Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 0 E 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions o2 'lip o3 -"► o4 45s 25s ;::20s lF 06 "'A m7 08 45 s ` 27 s V118 s AM Peak Hour 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour � -0. � ,� � � 4\ t 1 ane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r tt Volume (vph) 0 216 189 294 185 0 0 0 0 350 0 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Fit Permitted 0.492 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 916 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 210 109 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 240 210 327 206 0 0 0 0 389 0 109 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 240 210 327 206 0 0 0 0 0 389 109 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour --* --,, --t 4.-- 4-- 4-- t t Lane Group , EBL EBT EBR WBL .. WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 22.0 22.0 32.0 54.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 24.4% 24.4% 35.6% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% Maximum Green (s) 16.0 16.0 26.0 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 26.8 26.8 48.0 48.0 30.0 30.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.30 0.30 0.53 0.53 0.33 0.33 vlc Ratio 0.28 0.43 0.52 0.13 0.66 0.24 Control Delay 26.4 7.3 24.3 10.5 32.0 6.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.4 7.3 24.3 10.5 32.0 6.0 LOS C A C B C A Approach Delay 17.5 19.0 26.3 Approach LOS B B C 90th %ile Green (s) 21.2 21.2 20.8 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 24.8 24.8 17.2 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 27.0 27.0 15.0 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 29.1 29.1 12.9 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 31.8 31.8 10.2 48.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 54 0 116 32 187 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 94 58 227 42 287 35 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 866 483 735 1631 590 449 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced We Ratio 0.28 0.43 0.44 0.13 0.66 0.24 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp 4,01 -# o2 1 04 32 s 1 "22 s - 36 s ■-- 06 54 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBC- NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r *T r Volume (vph) 84 482 0 0 339 159 140 0 341 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.442 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 587 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 177 304 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 93 536 0 0 377 177 156 0 379 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 536 0 0 377 177 0 156 379 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 10 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour -,* --* ~i 4-- 4--- 4. - 4\ T l,' \P. 41 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1% 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 36.6 36.6 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.38 0.53 Control Delay 12.2 12.9 21.8 7.1 27.0 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.2 12.9 21.8 7.4 27.0 8.6 LOS B B C A C A Approach Delay 12.8 17.2 14.0 Approach LOS B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 11.9 49.0 31.1 31.1 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 10.0 49.0 33.0 33.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 8.7 49.0 34.3 34.3 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 36 113 73 5 68 30 Queue Length 95th (ft) m56 153 127 66 123 107 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 447 1927 1439 749 407 716 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 209 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 103 0 0 0 8 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.21 0.29 0.26 0.33 0.38 0.54 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 L1 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & o2 t 08 55s 'A +M-- 05 06 23 s I L132 s 35 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7- Report PHR+A Page 12 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 22: Site Drive #1 & AM Peak Hour `�► ""� T Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t T Volume (vph) 0 9 0 544 927 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.992 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 0 1863 1848 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 0 1863 1848 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 569 1260 3060 Travel Time (s) 12.9 28.6 69.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 10 0 604 1030 63 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 10 0 604 1093 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary 1 Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 13 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 24: Site Drive #2 & AM Peak Hour * I I t Lane Group EBl EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR j Lane Configurations y '� T T Volume (vph) 44 9 85 500 794 142 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.977 0.979 Fit Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 0 1770 1863 1824 0 Flt Permitted 0.960 0.214 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 0 399 1863 1824 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 34 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 8898 1260 Travel Time (s) 15.6 202.2 28.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 10 94 556 882 158 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 0 94 556 1040 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 14 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & -.* ---t 4\ t 1 41 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 0.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 14.4% 0.0% 85.6% 85.6% 85.6% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 7.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 7.4 74.2 74.2 74.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.82 0.82 0.82 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.29 0.36 0.69 Control Delay 41.9 5.3 3.5 5.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.9 5.3 3.5 5.9 LOS D A A A Approach Delay 41.9 3.8 5.9 Approach LOS D A A 90th %ile Green (s) 7.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 9.3 68.7 68.7 68.7 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 8.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 6.7 71.3 71.3 71.3 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 12 77 169 Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 29 106 678 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 8818 1180 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) 157 332 1550 1523 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.28 0.36 0.68 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 15 E �J 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 24: Site Drive #2 & AM Peak Hour Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 24: Site Drive #2 & I 1# o2 o4 77s 13s 06 77 s 2/22/2008 PHR+A Synchro 7 - Report Page 16 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour Lam Group EBL EBT ' EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +Tr c1 T+ T Volume (vph) 128 49 251 62 55 56 274 842 86 49 498 220 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.921 0.956 0.986 0.954 Flt Protected 0.985 0.982 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1601 0 0 1638 0 1687 1751 0 1687 1694 0 Flt Permitted 0.985 0.982 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1601 0 0 1638 0 1687 1751 0 1687 1694 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 142 54 279 69 61 62 304 936 96 54 553 244 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 475 0 0 192 0 304 1032 0 54 797 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR' WBL ' WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ +T 4 Volume (vph) 0 63 28 172 139 0 0 0 0 238 0 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.981 Fit Protected 0.973 0.959 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1684 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Fit Permitted 0.973 0.959 Said. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1684 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 70 31 191 154 0 0 0 0 264 0 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 101 0 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 308 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary 1 Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 45.8% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 0 . 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR ' WBL WBT WBR ' NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T T +T+ Volume (vph) 39 262 0 0 268 271 44 0 158 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.932 0.894 Fit Protected 0.994 0.989 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1754 0 0 1655 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.994 0.989 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1754 0 0 1655 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 43 291 0 0 298 301 49 0 176 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 334 0 0 599 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions } PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL _ WBT WBR NBL ' NBT ' NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations t r '� tt r t r '� t r Volume (vph) 370 208 134 47 375 47 368 777 26 26 367 164 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.442 0.088 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 823 1776 1583 164 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 149 52 20 182 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 284 334 3060 544 Travel Time (s) 6.5 7.6 69.5 12.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 411 231 149 52 417 52 409 863 29 29 408 182 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 411 231 149 52 417 52 409 863 29 29 408 182 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 2 6 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 i 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour -1, --1, --v 'r *-- 4- 4\ I l # Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT MR Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 22.0 22.0 14.0 18.0 18.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 24.4% 24.4% 15.6% 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 21.6 21.6 7.4 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.52 0.30 0.36 0.88 0.20 0.93 0.91 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Control Delay 62.3 36.2 11.3 46.1 60.3 12.5 40.7 27.4 4.7 25.0 14.5 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.3 36.2 11.3 46.1 60.3 12.5 40.7 27.4 4.7 25.0 14.5 2.2 LOS E D B D E B D C A C B A Approach Delay 45.1 54.1 31.1 11.4 Approach LOS D D C B 90th %ile Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 12.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 30th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 12.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 10th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 126 104 0 28 124 0 188 369 1 9 132 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #210 #227 75 64 #207 32 m#345 #684 m3 36 203 29 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 2980 464 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity (vph) 458 447 493 157 472 256 439 947 854 87 947 929 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.53 0.30 0.33 0.88 0.20 0.93 0.91 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour to2 T o3 "'11' o4 54s 11 14s 22s t m6.114 #— 07 08 54s 18s 1 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt r Vi tt +T r Volume (vph) 0 308 155 379 291 0 0 0 0 188 0 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 At Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Flt Permitted 0.443 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 825 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 172 148 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 342 172 421 323 0 0 0 0 209 0 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 342 172 421 323 0 0 0 0 0 209 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 35.6% 65.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 21.0 26.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 29.6 29.6 53.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.59 0.59 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.35 0.63 0.18 0.42 0.35 Control Delay 25.4 6.6 29.7 10.2 29.9 7.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.4 6.6 29.7 10.2 29.9 7.1 LOS C A C B C A Approach Delay 19.1 21.3 20.4 Approach LOS B C C 90th %ile Green (s) 23.2 23.2 23.8 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 27.4 27.4 19.6 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 30.0 30.0 17.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 32.3 32.3 14.7 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 35.3 35.3 11.7 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 0 174 38 97 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 49 300 86 162 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 959 487 759 1801 492 421 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.35 0.55 0.18 0.42 0.35 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum We Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp 4,01 ::�o2 * 04 32 s 1 127 s 31 s 06 59 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour --* -• ---t 'r '~ *\ t r 1 Lane Group EBL EBT 'EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r *T r Volume (vph) 148 348 0 0 537 370 132 0 364 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 At Permitted 0.284 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 377 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 411 404 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 164 387 0 0 597 411 147 0 404 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 387 0 0 597 411 0 147 404 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 10 • • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour Lane Group EBL ' EBT EBR WBL ' WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR ' SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1% 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 31.2 31.2 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.20 0.49 0.50 0.36 0.52 Control Delay 28.5 12.6 29.9 9.5 26.6 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.5 12.6 31.1 10.1 26.6 5.1 LOS C B C B C A Approach Delay 17.3 22.6 10.8 Approach LOS B C B 90th %ile Green (s) 16.5 49.0 26.5 26.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 13.5 49.0 29.5 29.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 11.6 49.0 31.4 31.4 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 9.8 49.0 33.2 33.2 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 58 143 0 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 149 124 m175 m56 117 62 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 372 1927 1228 817 407 784 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 397 141 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 97 0 0 0 11 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.21 0.72 0.61 0.36 0.52 Intersection Summary i Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & o2 t 08 55 s m5 06 23 s 32 s 35 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 12 • 1-81 Distribution Center 22: Site Drive #1 & 4\ t 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour 'Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 1 Lane Configurations t Volume (vph) 0 36 0 1109 679 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.997 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 0 1863 1857 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 0 1863 1857 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 569 1260 3060 Travel Time (s) 12.9 28.6 69.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 40 0 1232 754 18 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 40 0 1232 772 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary i Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 13 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & -* 4\ T 1 41 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour Larie Group .. , EBL * EBR NBL NBT 8BT SBR Lane Configurations y '� t T Volume (vph) 168 36 24 941 675 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.976 0.993 Flt Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 0 1770 1863 1850 0 At Permitted 0.960 0.268 Satd. Flow (perm) 1745 0 499 1863 1850 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 8898 1260 Travel Time (s) 15.6 202.2 28.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 187 40 27 1046 750 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 0 27 1046 794 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 14 • 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour -,�r t 1 V Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 0.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 32.2% 0.0% 67.8% 67.8% 67.8% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.4 61.6 61.6 61.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.68 0.68 0.68 vlc Ratio 0.70 0.08 0.82 0.63 Control Delay 43.6 6.8 18.7 8.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.6 6.8 18.7 8.9 LOS D A B A Approach Delay 43.6 18.4 8.9 Approach LOS D B A 90th %ile Green (s) 22.4 55.6 55.6 55.6 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 18.9 59.1 59.1 59.1 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 16.4 61.6 61.6 61.6 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 13.9 64.1 64.1 64.1 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 10.2 67.8 67.8 67.8 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 116 5 372 119 Queue Length 95th (ft) 178 17 #799 458 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 8818 1180 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) 454 342 1276 1269 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.50 0.08 0.82 0.63 intersection- Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 15 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay:17.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min)15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 24: Site Drive #2 & 2010 Build -out Conditions o2 .1# o4 61 s 29 s 1 o6 61 s 2/22/2008 PHR+A PM Peak Hour Synchro 7 - Report Page 16 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Lme Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T r +T r T+ '� T Volume (vph) 194 64 171 64 46 74 153 416 62 13 657 183 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.981 0.967 At Protected 0.950 0.972 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 1681 1509 0 1686 1509 1687 1742 0 1687 1717 0 Flt Permitted 0.679 0.780 0.160 0.408 Satd. Flow (perm) 1206 1681 1509 0 1353 1509 284 1742 0 724 1717 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 190 82 17 31 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 216 71 190 71 51 82 170 462 69 14 730 203 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 216 71 190 0 122 82 170 531 0 14 933 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 1 • PJ 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements * Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL ' WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL sBT SBR Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 2 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 64.0 64.0 0.0 64.0 64.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 28.9% 71.1% 71.1% 0.0% 71.1% 71.1% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None Min Min Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 52.4 52.4 52.4 52.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.22 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 We Ratio 0.82 0.19 0.40 0.41 0.21 0.94 0.48 0.03 0.85 Control Delay 59.2 30.2 7.5 35.0 8.5 75.2 9.5 6.1 21.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 59.2 30.2 7.5 35.0 8.5 75.2 9.5 6.1 21.1 LOS E C A C A E A A C Approach Delay 34.3 24.4 25.4 20.9 Approach LOS C C C C 90th %ile Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Max Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Max Max Max 50th %ile Green (s) 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Max Hold Hold 30th %ile Green (s) 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 57.5 57.5 57.5 57.5 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Gap Gap Hold Hold 10th %ile Green (s) 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 11.4 32.2 32.2 32.2 32.2 10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Gap Gap Hold Hold Queue Length 50th (ft) 117 33 0 60 0 77 133 3 355 Queue Length 95th (ft) #237 70 53 112 36 #219 202 9 #587 Internal Link Dist (ft) 977 2034 781 8818 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 302 421 520 339 439 204 1255 520 1241 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.72 0.17 0.37 0.36 0.19 0.83 0.42 0.03 0.75 . Intersection Summary . _ - . . . - - . . Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 82.8 Natural Cycle: 80 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 2 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.94 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 90 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 88.5 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 55.6 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: Hopewell Road & I o2 I" o4 64 s 26 s 1 o6 08 64 s 26 s 2122/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 3 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour. wlimprovements Lane Group ' EBL EBT EBR WBL ^WBT WBR NBL NBT 'NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations T+ *T 4 Volume (vph) 0 77 33 133 83 0 0 0 0 152 0 20 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.984 Flt Protected 0.970 0.958 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1674 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Flt Permitted 0.741 0.958 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1279 0 0 0 0 0 1599 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 37 8 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 86 37 148 92 0 0 0 0 169 0 22 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 123 0 0 240 0 0 0 0 0 191 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 4 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Lane Group ' EBL EBT EBR ' WBL ' WBT WBR NBC NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 54.0 0.0 54.0 54.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 60.0% 0.0% 60.0% 60.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 48.0 48.0 48.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 12.4 12.4 10.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 0.35 0.30 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.53 0.39 Control Delay 6.8 14.0 13.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 6.8 14.0 13.3 LOS A B B Approach Delay 6.8 14.0 13.3 Approach LOS A B B 90th %ile Green (s) 19.1 19.1 19.1 14.0 14.0 90th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 70th %ile Green (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 11.0 11.0 70th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 11.9 11.9 11.9 9.4 9.4 50th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 9.9 9.9 9.9 8.1 8.1 30th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 10.3 10.3 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Dwell Dwell Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 32 26 Queue Length 95th (ft) 35 87 77 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1369 590 634 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1703 1279 1395 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.07 0.19 0.14 Intersection Summary 1 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 35.2 Natural Cycle: 40 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 12.1 Intersection LOS: B 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 5 i • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min)15 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 45.1 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 37.4 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 33.3 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 30 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 30.3 Splits and Phases: 8: SB ON Ramp & —'I" o2 t m4 54 s 36 s 4— m6 54 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 6 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements -11 --,, --v 'e- 4. 4\ I t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 T 41.) Volume (vph) 22 207 0 0 188 187 28 0 215 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.933 0.880 Flt Protected 0.995 0.994 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1759 0 0 1657 0 0 1484 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.995 0.994 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1759 0 0 1657 0 0 1484 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 24 230 0 0 209 208 31 0 239 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 254 0 0 417 0 0 270 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 7 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements --p. t v, .�--- 4.- "' \ t 1" Lane Group EBL EBT ' EBR WBL WBT WBR ' NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBf Lane Configurations t r Vi tt r t r t r Volume (vph) 154 268 401 10 80 10 139 215 33 33 577 278 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.258 0.601 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 481 1776 1583 1120 1776 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 446 11 37 259 Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases 30 30 30 30 284 334 3060 533 6.5 7.6 69.5 12.1 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% 171 298 446 11 89 11 154 239 37 37 641 309 171 298 446 11 89 11 154 239 37 37 641 309 No No No No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 24 24 12 12 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 Yes Yes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 94 94 94 6 6 6 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm 7 4 3 8 2 6 4 8 2 2 6 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 8 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour. w/improvements --,, ---1' f 4' t ( 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 20.0 20.0 29.0 18.0 18.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 Total Split (%) 34.4% 22.2% 22.2% 32.2% 20.0% 20.0% 45.6% 45.6% 45.6% 45.6% 45.6% 45.6% Maximum Green (s) 25.0 14.0 14.0 23.0 12.0 12.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.6 24.0 24.0 6.4 10.5 10.5 51.3 51.3 51.3 51.3 51.3 51.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.27 0.27 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 0.57 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.60 0.59 0.09 0.22 0.06 0.56 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.63 0.30 Control Delay 26.3 32.5 8.6 40.4 35.2 16.1 23.9 10.1 3.9 11.8 19.1 3.9 Queue Delay 0.0 3.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.3 35.6 9.1 40.4 35.2 16.1 23.9 10.1 3.9 11.8 19.1 3.9 LOS C D A D D B C B A B B A Approach Delay 20.9 33.9 14.5 14.1 Approach LOS C C B B 90th %ile Green (s) 12.6 27.7 27.7 7.3 22.4 22.4 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 10.9 25.2 25.2 0.0 8.3 8.3 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 52.8 70th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 9.8 23.4 23.4 0.0 7.6 7.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 54.6 50th %ile Term Code Gap Hold Hold Skip Gap Gap Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 8.7 22.7 22.7 0.0 8.0 8.0 55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 55.3 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Skip Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 21.1 21.1 21.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 56.9 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Skip Skip Skip Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 30 126 8 6 25 0 51 38 1 8 205 11 Queue Length 95th (ft) 51 254 157 22 39 13 #189 119 13 32 #537 69 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 2980 453 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity(vph) 954 497 750 452 554 257 274 1013 919 638 1013 1014 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 114 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.18 0.78 0.66 0.02 0.16 0.04 0.56 0.24 0.04 0.06 0.63 0.30 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 9 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Natural Cycle: 70 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 17.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. I o2 f m3 ­10" o4 41 s 29 s 20 s 06 �-- m7 1 08 41 s 31 s I IF 118S 0 9 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_w/imlprovements # Lane Group EBL EBT ' EBR WBL VIBT WBR NBL NBT NBR St SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt if Vi tt 4 r Volume (vph) 0 216 189 294 185 0 0 0 0 350 0 98 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Fit Permitted 0.488 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 909 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 210 109 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 240 210 327 206 0 0 0 0 389 0 109 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 240 210 327 206 0 0 0 0 0 389 109 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 11 0 40 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL .. SBT 'SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 21.0 21.0 32.0 53.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 23.3% 23.3% 35.6% 58.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 41.1 % 41.1 % 41.1 % Maximum Green (s) 15.0 15.0 26.0 47.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 25.5 25.5 47.0 47.0 31.0 31.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 0.28 0.52 0.52 0.34 0.34 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.45 0.52 0.13 0.64 0.24 Control Delay 27.6 7.7 25.6 12.2 30.5 5.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 27.6 7.7 25.6 12.2 30.5 5.8 LOS C A C B C A Approach Delay 18.3 20.4 25.1 Approach LOS B C C 90th %ile Green (s) 19.8 19.8 21.2 47.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 23.5 23.5 17.5 47.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 25.8 25.8 15.2 47.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 27.9 27.9 13.1 47.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 30.7 30.7 10.3 47.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 55 0 123 34 184 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 96 60 234 48 282 35 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 826 471 723 1597 610 460 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.29 0.45 0.45 0.13 0.64 0.24 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 12 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp 4,01 --10' 02 04 32 s 1 1 121 s 37 s i— 06 53 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 13 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour_w/improvements --* --p. f- 4--- f *� Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL ' NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Vi tt tT r +T r Volume (vph) 84 482 0 0 339 159 140 0 341 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.442 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 587 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 177 304 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 93 536 0 0 377 177 156 0 379 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 536 0 0 377 177 0 156 379 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 14 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements Lane Group EBL EBT ' EBR WBL ' WBT 'WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 36.6 36.6 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.41 0.41 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.28 0.26 0.24 0.38 0.53 Control Delay 12.9 13.5 20.9 6.8 27.0 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.9 13.5 20.9 7.1 27.0 8.6 LOS B B C A C A Approach Delay 13.4 16.5 14.0 Approach LOS B B B 90th %ile Green (s) 11.9 49.0 31.1 31.1 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 10.0 49.0 33.0 33.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 8.7 49.0 34.3 34.3 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 35 112 67 3 68 30 Queue Length 95th (ft) m62 156 128 70 123 107 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 447 1927 1439 749 407 716 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 224 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 91 0 0 0 7 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.21 0.29 0.26 0.34 0.38 0.53 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 15 E 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & AM Peak Hour. wlimprovements Natural Cycle: 45 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.53 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 59.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & o2 55 s o5 06 t 08 23s 32s 1 35s 2/22/2008 PHR+A Synchro 7 - Report Page 16 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 22: Site Drive #1 & 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour_w/improvements Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations t Volume (vph) 0 9 0 544 927 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.992 Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 0 1863 1848 0 Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 0 1863 1848 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 569 1260 3060 Travel Time (s) 12.9 28.6 69.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 10 0 604 1030 63 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 10 0 604 1093 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free lntersection'Summary i Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 62.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 17 • 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & 4\ t 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour_w/improvements Lane Group EBL EBR 'NBL NBT SBT SBR ' i Lane Configurations y t T Volume (vph) 44 9 85 500 794 142 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.977 0.979 Fit Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1747 0 1770 1863 1824 0 Fit Permitted 0.960 0.214 Satd. Flow (perm) 1747 0 399 1863 1824 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 34 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 8898 1260 Travel Time (s) 15.6 202.2 28.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 10 94 556 882 158 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 59 0 94 556 1040 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 18 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 24: Site Drive #2 & AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements ---* --* '\ Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 13.0 0.0 77.0 77.0 77.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 14.4% 0.0% 85.6% 85.6% 85.6% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 7.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 7.4 74.2 74.2 74.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.82 0.82 0.82 We Ratio 0.39 0.29 0.36 0.69 Control Delay 41.9 5.3 3.5 5.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 41.9 5.3 3.5 5.7 LOS D A A A Approach Delay 41.9 3.8 5.7 Approach LOS D A A 90th %ile Green (s) 7.0 71.0 71.0 71.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 9.3 68.7 68.7 68.7 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 8.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 6.7 71.3 71.3 71.3 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 84.0 84.0 84.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 27 12 77 151 Queue Length 95th (ft) 66 29 106 644 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 8818 1180 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) 157 332 1550 1523 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.38 0.28 0.36 0.68 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 19 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.69 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.2 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 24: Site Drive #2 & 2010 Build -out Conditions AM Peak Hour_wlimprovements t o2 'A m4 77s 13s 1 06 77 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report PHR+A Page 20 0 is 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements -.4 --,, -,* 4�- ,-- '1 4\ Lane Group EBL ' EBT EBR ' WBL WBT 'WBR ' NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT ' ' SBR Lane Configurations t r 4T r Vi T+ T+ Volume (vph) 128 49 251 62 55 56 274 842 86 49 498 220 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 150 0 150 150 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.986 0.954 Flt Protected 0.950 0.974 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1687 1681 1509 0 1685 1509 1687 1751 0 1687 1694 0 Flt Permitted 0.674 0.805 0.127 0.183 Satd. Flow (perm) 1197 1681 1509 0 1393 1509 226 1751 0 325 1694 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 279 62 9 29 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1057 2114 861 8898 Travel Time (s) 24.0 48.0 19.6 202.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 13% 7% 7% 13% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 142 54 279 69 61 62 304 936 96 54 553 244 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 142 54 279 0 130 62 304 1032 0 54 797 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm pm+pt Perm Protected Phases 4 8 5 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 4 8 8 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 1 E • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Lane Group EBL .. EBT EBR wBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 4 4 4 8 8 8 5 2 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 15.0 86.0 0.0 71.0 71.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 28.3% 28.3% 28.3% 28.3% 28.3% 28.3% 12.5% 71.7% 0.0% 59.2% 59.2% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 9.0 80.0 65.0 65.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None None Min Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 17.6 64.5 64.5 48.7 48.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.19 0.68 0.68 0.51 0.51 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.17 0.55 0.50 0.19 1.01 0.86 0.32 0.90 Control Delay 52.2 37.0 9.0 44.6 10.9 75.4 21.9 20.4 34.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 52.2 37.0 9.0 44.6 10.9 75.4 21.9 20.4 34.9 LOS D D A D B E C C C Approach Delay 25.1 33.7 34.1 34.0 Approach LOS C C C C 90th %ile Green (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 9.0 80.0 65.0 65.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Hold Hold Hold Max Max Max Max 70th %ile Green (s) 22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6 22.6 9.0 79.0 64.0 64.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Hold Gap Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 17.9 9.0 65.9 50.9 50.9 50th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Hold Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 13.6 9.0 54.9 39.9 39.9 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Hold Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 43.0 28.0 28.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Gap Hold Hold Hold Max Hold Gap Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 80 28 0 72 0 -112 413 18 390 Queue Length 95th (ft) 165 69 70 148 36 #276 #917 55 #734 Internal Link Dist (ft) 977 2034 781 8818 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 150 150 Base Capacity(vph) 373 523 662 434 513 300 1472 234 1228 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.38 0.10 0.42 0.30 0.12 1.01 0.70 0.23 0.65 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 120 Actuated Cycle Length: 94.8 Natural Cycle: 90 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 2 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 5: Hopewell Road & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 90th %ile Actuated Cycle: 120 70th %ile Actuated Cycle:113.6 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 95.8 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 80.5 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 64 Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 5: Hopewell Road & to2 --P' o4 86 s 34 s 4N o5 4 o6 08 15s I L171 s I I 34s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 3 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements --,, -,* 4- 4\ \40. 4/ Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL ' SBT SBR Lane Configurations 194 Volume (vph) 0 63 28 172 139 0 0 0 0 238 0 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.959 0.981 Flt Protected 0.973 0.959 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1703 0 0 1684 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 At Permitted 0.773 0.959 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1703 0 0 1338 0 0 0 0 0 1596 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 31 9 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1449 670 714 736 Travel Time (s) 32.9 15.2 16.2 16.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 70 31 191 154 0 0 0 0 264 0 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 101 0 0 345 0 0 0 0 0 308 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 6 4 Permitted Phases 6 4 Detector Phase 2 6 6 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 4 0 i 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Lane Group EBL EBT EBR ' WBL' WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT $BR Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 62.0 0.0 62.0 62.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.0 28.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 68.9% 0.0% 68.9% 68.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 31.1% 31.1% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 56.0 56.0 56.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Min Min Act Effct Green (s) 17.8 17.8 14.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.40 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.65 0.60 Control Delay 7.4 17.9 18.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.4 17.9 18.9 LOS A B B Approach Delay 7.4 17.9 18.9 Approach LOS A B B 90th %ile Green (s) 27.0 27.0 27.0 21.4 21.4 90th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 70th %ile Green (s) 21.4 21.4 21.4 16.8 16.8 70th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 50th %ile Green (s) 18.1 18.1 18.1 13.9 13.9 50th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 30th %ile Green (s) 14.4 14.4 14.4 11.7 11.7 30th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap 10th %ile Green (s) 10.3 10.3 10.3 9.1 9.1 10th %ile Term Code Hold Gap Gap Gap Gap Queue Length 50th (ft) 10 64 62 Queue Length 95th (ft) 37 164 153 Internal Link Dist (ft) 1369 590 634 656 Turn Bay Length (ft) Base Capacity (vph) 1679 1319 828 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.06 0.26 0.37 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 44.8 Natural Cycle: 50 Control Type: Actuated -Uncoordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 16.9 Intersection LOS: B 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 5 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 8: SB ON Ramp & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 90th Me Actuated Cycle: 60.4 70th %ile Actuated Cycle: 50.2 50th %ile Actuated Cycle: 44 30th %ile Actuated Cycle: 38.1 10th %ile Actuated Cycle: 31.4 Splits and Phases: 8: SIB ON Ramp & --P' o2 o4 62 s 28 s o6 62 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 6 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 10: Hopewell Road & NB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations 4 T +T* Volume (vph) 39 262 0 0 268 271 44 0 158 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.932 0.894 Flt Protected 0.994 0.989 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1754 0 0 1655 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.994 0.989 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1754 0 0 1655 0 0 1500 0 0 0 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 670 1057 730 697 Travel Time (s) 15.2 24.0 16.6 15.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 12% 7% 7% 7% 7% 7% 12% 7% 12% 7% 7% 7% Adj. Flow (vph) 43 291 0 0 298 301 49 0 176 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 334 0 0 599 0 0 225 0 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.6% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 7 E 0 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & Lane'Group' ' EBL 'EBT EBR WBL Wb*T WBR NBL Lane Configurations Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Heavy Vehicles (%) Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements t /0` 1* i 4/ NBT 'NBR SBL SBT SBI �S t r tt r -Vi t r t r 370 208 134 47 375 47 368 777 26 26 367 164 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 150 0 150 150 300 150 150 180 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 1770 1776 1583 1770 1776 1583 0.950 0.950 0.442 0.088 3433 1863 1583 1770 3539 1583 823 1776 1583 164 1776 1583 Yes Yes Yes Yes 149 52 20 182 30 30 30 30 284 334 3060 539 6.5 7.6 69.5 12.3 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 7% 2% 2% 7% 2% 411 231 149 52 417 52 409 863 29 29 408 182 411 231 149 52 417 52 409 863 29 29 408 182 No No No No No No No No No No No No Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right 24 24 12 12 0 0 0 0 16 16 16 16 Yes Yes 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 94 94 94 94 6 6 6 6 CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Prot Perm Prot Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm 7 4 3 8 2 6 4 8 2 2 6 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 8 • 1-81 Distribution Center 14: Route 11 & 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour_wl improvements -.4 --,, , '- *-- 4\ t 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT Sbk Detector Phase 7 4 4 3 8 8 2 2 2 6 6 6 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 22.0 22.0 14.0 18.0 18.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 24.4% 24.4% 15.6% 20.0% 20.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% 60.0% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None None None C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max C-Max Act Effct Green (s) 12.0 21.6 21.6 7.4 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.24 0.24 0.08 0.13 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.52 0.30 0.36 0.88 0.20 0.93 0.91 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Control Delay 62.3 36.2 11.3 46.1 60.3 12.5 40.7 27.4 4.7 25.0 14.5 2.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 62.3 36.2 11.3 46.1 60.3 12.5 40.7 27.4 4.7 25.0 14.5 2.2 LOS E D B D E B D C A C B A Approach Delay 45.1 54.1 31.1 11.4 Approach LOS D D C B 90th %ile Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 90th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 70th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 12.0 16.0 16.0 8.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 50th %ile Term Code Max Max Max Max Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 12.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 30th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 12.0 30.0 30.0 0.0 12.0 12.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 10th %ile Term Code Max Hold Hold Skip Max Max Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 126 104 0 28 124 0 188 369 1 9 132 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) #210 #227 75 64 #207 32 m#345 #684 m3 36 203 29 Internal Link Dist (ft) 204 254 2980 459 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 150 300 150 150 180 Base Capacity (vph) 458 447 493 157 472 256 439 947 854 87 947 929 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.90 0.53 0.30 0.33 0.88 0.20 0.93 0.91 0.03 0.33 0.43 0.20 Intersection Summary 4 Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 9 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 14: Route 11 & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.93 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 14: Route 11 & to2 'ice o3 --I" o4 122s 54s 14s m6 m7 �1-- 1 08 54s F 18s 118S 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 10 0 t• J 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Lane Group . ' LBL EBT LBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT sBR Lane Configurations tt r tt +T r Volume (vph) 0 308 155 379 291 0 0 0 0 188 0 133 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 150 150 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 2911 1129 1770 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Fit Permitted 0.443 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 2911 1129 825 3059 0 0 0 0 0 1770 1129 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Said. Flow (RTOR) 172 148 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 927 724 541 527 Travel Time (s) 21.1 16.5 12.3 12.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 2% 24% 43% 2% 18% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% Adj. Flow (vph) 0 342 172 421 323 0 0 0 0 209 0 148 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 342 172 421 323 0 0 0 0 0 209 148 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm pm+pt Perm Perm Protected Phases 2 1 6 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 4 4 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 11 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Lane Group ' - EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBf SBR Detector Phase 2 2 1 6 4 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 0.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 59.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 0.0% 30.0% 30.0% 35.6% 65.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 34.4% 34.4% 34.4% Maximum Green (s) 21.0 21.0 26.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 29.6 29.6 53.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.33 0.33 0.59 0.59 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.36 0.35 0.63 0.18 0.42 0.35 Control Delay 25.4 6.6 29.7 10.2 29.9 7.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 25.4 6.6 29.7 10.2 29.9 7.1 LOS C A C B C A Approach Delay 19.1 21.3 20.4 Approach LOS B C C 90th %ile Green (s) 23.2 23.2 23.8 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 90th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 27.4 27.4 19.6 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 70th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 30.0 30.0 17.0 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 50th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 32.3 32.3 14.7 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 30th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 35.3 35.3 11.7 53.0 25.0 25.0 25.0 10th %ile Term Code Coord Coord Gap Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 76 0 174 38 97 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 127 49 300 86 162 45 Internal Link Dist (ft) 847 644 461 447 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 959 487 759 1801 492 421 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.36 0.35 0.55 0.18 0.42 0.35 Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 63 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:EBT and 6:WBTL, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 12 • 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.63 Intersection Signal Delay: 20.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 17: Rest Church Road & SB Off Ramp f, 01 ­11' o2 o4 32 s I I 127s 31 s 06 59 s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 13 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements -• 4__ T 1 Lane Group EBL ' EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tt tt r 4 if Volume (vph) 148 348 0 0 537 370 132 0 364 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 150 0 0 150 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1262 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Flt Permitted 0.284 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 377 3539 0 0 3539 1583 0 1262 1583 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 411 404 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 724 284 615 464 Travel Time (s) 16.5 6.5 14.0 10.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Heavy Vehicles (%) 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 43% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% Adj. Flow (vph) 164 387 0 0 597 411 147 0 404 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 164 387 0 0 597 411 0 147 404 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type pm+pt Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 5 2 6 8 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 8 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 14 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements -,, --* f- 4.- t /P. 1 ,/ Lane'Group EBL EBT EBR WBL 'WBT ' WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 5 2 6 6 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 32.0 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 25.6% 61.1 % 0.0% 0.0% 35.6% 35.6% 38.9% 38.9% 38.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 49.0 26.0 26.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Act Effct Green (s) 49.0 49.0 31.2 31.2 29.0 29.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.54 0.35 0.35 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.20 0.49 0.50 0.36 0.52 Control Delay 28.5 12.6 29.9 9.5 26.6 5.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 28.5 12.6 31.1 10.1 26.6 5.1 LOS C B C B C A Approach Delay 17.3 22.6 10.8 Approach LOS B C B 90th %ile Green (s) 16.5 49.0 26.5 26.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 70th %ile Green (s) 13.5 49.0 29.5 29.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 50th %ile Green (s) 11.6 49.0 31.4 31.4 29.0 29.0 29.0 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 30th %ile Green (s) 9.8 49.0 33.2 33.2 29.0 29.0 29.0 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR 10th %ile Green (s) 7.5 49.0 35.5 35.5 29.0 29.0 29.0 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord MaxR MaxR MaxR Queue Length 50th (ft) 65 58 143 0 64 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 149 124 m175 m56 117 62 Internal Link Dist (ft) 644 204 535 384 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 150 Base Capacity (vph) 372 1927 1228 817 407 784 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 397 141 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 97 0 0 0 11 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.44 0.21 0.72 0.61 0.36 0.52 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 58 (64%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL and 6:WBT, Start of Green 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user_name% Page 15 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Conditions 20: NB Off Ramp & PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Natural Cycle: 55 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.52 Intersection Signal Delay: 18.1 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.0% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. Splits and Phases: 20: NB Off Ramp & m2 55 s .y — m5 06 t 08 23s I L,132s L 35s 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 16 • 1-81 Distribution Center 22: Site Drive #1 & 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations r t T Volume (vph) 0 36 0 1109 679 16 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 0.997 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1611 0 1863 1857 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1611 0 1863 1857 0 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 569 1260 3060 Travel Time (s) 12.9 28.6 69.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 40 0 1232 754 18 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 40 0 1232 772 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Sign Control Stop Free Free Intersection Summary Area Type: Other Control Type: Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Utilization 61.7% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 17 C-11 J 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & -.11 4\ 41 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour_w/ improvements Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations y ' t T Volume (vph) 168 36 24 941 675 40 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 150 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.976 0.993 Flt Protected 0.960 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1745 0 1770 1863 1850 0 Flt Permitted 0.960 0.268 Satd. Flow (perm) 1745 0 499 1863 1850 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 11 6 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 8898 1260 Travel Time (s) 15.6 202.2 28.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 187 40 27 1046 750 44 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 0 27 1046 794 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 2 Detector Template Left Left Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Protected Phases 4 2 6 Permitted Phases 2 Detector Phase 4 2 2 6 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 18 is 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & -.4 4\ t 1 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour_wl improvements Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 0.0 61.0 61.0 61.0 0.0 Total Split (%) 32.2% 0.0% 67.8% 67.8% 67.8% 0.0% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Min C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 16.4 61.6 61.6 61.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.68 0.68 0.68 vlc Ratio 0.70 0.08 0.82 0.63 Control Delay 43.6 6.8 18.7 8.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 43.6 6.8 18.7 8.9 LOS D A B A Approach Delay 43.6 18.4 8.9 Approach LOS D B A 90th %ile Green (s) 22.4 55.6 55.6 55.6 90th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 18.9 59.1 59.1 59.1 70th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 16.4 61.6 61.6 61.6 50th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 13.9 64.1 64.1 64.1 30th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 10.2 67.8 67.8 67.8 10th %ile Term Code Gap Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 116 5 372 119 Queue Length 95th (ft) 178 17 #799 458 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 8818 1180 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) 454 342 1276 1269 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 Reduced vlc Ratio 0.50 0.08 0.82 0.63 Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 90 Actuated Cycle Length: 90 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 60 2/22/2008 Synchro 7 - Report %user name% Page 19 0 1-81 Distribution Center 24: Site Drive #2 & Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay:17.6 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 24: Site Drive #2 & T 02 04 61 s 29 s * 06 61s 2010 Build -out Conditions PM Peak Hour_wl improvements 2/22/2008 Synchro 7- Report %user name% Page 20 F—I `.A 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Engineers. RAWilliamsport, Surveyoors. Planners. Landscape Architects. PH 10212 Governor Lane Blvd, Suite 1007 Maryland 21795 Phone: 1.223. .4010 831 Fax: 301.223.6831 To: Matt Smith Memorandum Organization/Company: Virginia Department of Transportation From: Date: Project Name/Subject: PHR+A Project Number: Michael Glickman, PE June 11, 2008 A Sut Nemental Analysis to: An Addendum to: A TrafficWact Analysis of I-8 1 Distribution Center 14596-1-0 Per your request, Patton Harris Rust & Associates (PHR+A) has prepared this document to provide supplemental analysis to the memorandum titled: An Addendrrvn to: A Traz lc LUl a t Anal sis of 1-81 Distribution Center, dated February 22, 2008, by PHR+A. The proposed I-81 Distribution Center will be located along the west side of Route 11, south of Rest Church Road, in Frederick County, Virginia. The purpose of this document is to provide revised analyses assuming via single site - driveway in lieu of the two site -driveways shown in the February 22, 2008 report. The proposed driveway is to be located along the west side of Route 11, opposite Branson Spring Road. PHR+A recently conducted weekday AM/PM peak hour turning movement counts at the intersection of Route 11 /Branson Spring Road. This document presents the revised traffic analyses at the intersection of Route 11 /Branson Spring Road/Site-driveway during 2010 build -out conditions. All methodology as well as all other study area intersection results remain consistent with the aforementioned memorandum tided: An Addenditm to: A Tart zc IoyhactAnal sis ofI-81 Distribution Center; dated February 22, 2008, by PHR+A. Figure 1 below shows the 2010 build -out traffic conditions peak hour volumes and ADT as well as 2010 build -out lane geometry and levels of service at the intersection of Route 11 /Branson Spring Road/Site-driveway. Page 1 of 2 0 0 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Memorandum To: VDOT Page 2 of 2 2010 Build -out Volumes No Scale 11 b Site- driv ewa *ftft 0(0) 9(6) (72)19 ft► ranson SPr�ng Road AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) 2010 Build -out LOS 11 Signalized Intersection C7� Overall LOS=A(Q Site-drivewa C(B) (C)C canton S Pans Road C� AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour) nT JF?+A Figure 1 2010 Build -out Traffic Conditions & LOS @ Route 11 & Site -driveway Engineers • Surveyors • Planners 9 Landscape Architects IMPACT STATEMENT P.O. Box 2397 Winchester, VA 22604 Phone 540-667-9300 FAX 540-667-2260 August 14, 2006 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBIN HULL AND KAY MARIE MORRISON TAX MAP NO. 33 ((A)) PARCEL 109 STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Beginning at the southeastern corner of the tract herein described said point being an iron rod set on the westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 and a corner to the other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison. Thence departing said westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 and running with said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison the following courses and distances: N74°-57'-06"W, 97.47 feet to an iron rod set, N65"-27'-06"W, 382.80 feet to an iron rod set, N28°-12'-06"W, 986.69 feet to an iron rod set, said rod being on the easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 and bearing N280- 12'-06"W, 2,164.80 feet to a set stone found, Thence departing said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison and running with said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 N190-55'-51"E, 240.94 feet to a iron pipe found, said pipe being a corner to Donald S. Cline. Thence departing said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 and running with said Donald S. Cline S680-47-4-7"E, 754.71 feet to a iron pipe found and S770-041- 47"E, 372.62 to a iron rod set, said rod being on the aforementioned westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11. Thence departing said Donald S. Cline and running with said westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 701.03 feet along the arc of a curve to the right said curve having a radius of 5,690.00 feet a central angle of 070-03'-33" and a chord which bears S130-38'- 12"W, 700.59 feet to a VHC concrete monument found and S17°-09'-58"W 254.63 feet, to the point of beginning and containing 18.9306 acres more or less. This description is subject, however, to all easements, rights -of -way, and restrictions of record. Triad Engineering, Inc. Morgantown o St. Albans Greensburg Hagerstown West Virginia Pennsylvania Maryland Winchester � Purcellville Virginia P.O. Box 2397 Lq Winchester, VA 22604 IF Phone 540-667-9300 FAX 540-667-2260 a AV August 14, 2006 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY OF ROBIN HULL AND KAY MARIE MORRISON TAX MAP NO. 33 ((A)) PARCEL 110 STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Beginning at the southeastern corner of the tract herein described said point being an iron rod set on the westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 and a corner to Donald Lee Bragg. Thence departing said westerly right-of-way line of U.S. Route 11 and running with said Donald Lee Bragg N700-36'-48"W, 515.84 feet to a fence post and S18°-31'-55"W, 142.22 feet to a fence post, said fence post being a corner to Charles W. and Joline S. Orndoff. Thence departing said .Donald Lee Bragg and running with said Charles W. and Joline S. Orndoff N670-35'-13"W, 748.75 feet to a iron rod set, said rod being on the easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81. Thence departing said Charles W. and Joline S. Orndoff and running with said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 N19"-55'-51 "E, 1,916.03 feet to an iron rod set, said rod being a corner to the other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison and bearing N280-12'-06"W, 2,164.80 feet to a set stone found. Thence departing said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 and running with said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison the following courses and distances: S28°-12'-06"E, 986.69 feet to an iron rod set, S65°-27'-06"E, 382.80 feet to an iron rod set, S740-57'-06"E, 97.47 feet to an iron rod set, said rod being on the aforementioned westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11. Thence departing said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison and running with said westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 S17"-09'-58"W, 836.27 feet to an iron rod set and 285.15 feet along the arc of a curve to the right said curve having a radius of 5,690.00 feet a central angle of 02"-52'-17" and a chord which bears S180-36'- Triad Engineering, Inc. Morgantown o St. Albans Greensburg Hagerstown Winchester - Purcellville West Virginia Pennsylvania Maryland Virginia 0 41 Pa ge 2 07"W, 285.12 feet to the point of beginning and containing 40.1464 acres more or less. This description is subject, however, to all easements, rights -of -way, and restrictions of record. • L 5av!nZs and Iran Aesoclation in nOnthI3 'in.7tall.ente of Se6,00, beginning 2, 1960, Until D000abor 2, 1979, when the entire unpaid balonco sh4.11 be- at arty' tiro. TIM AFcD OF TRMT ie mdo under the proviniona of Virginia Coda Socticc 55-59 and 50, ae mon'od, wvS aball be canatrued to imnoaa and confor uprn the Wtioo hareto and the benariciary haroundor, all the rlgbto, dutioo and obli- gation, jreocrlbod by the said SOction 55-59 and 60, as a Dded, one in short form as tharoin p rovidod,except as heroinbarcre or horcizartsr othsrviao restricted or expanded or chrnged. Trustee cru< iatlen in the e%r=t of advertisabant but payncnt before Salo, 2}% of the faze of said cote; in the event of eels, ye. Rdvertieaarnt yr.requ!Lred, to Subliftl the tsa; place and ter= Of the ea'_o once a WOOL for two iauccosoivo voakm in a novopaper publlahed or having general circulnticn in the {County -City, vith the laet innartion, if desired, on the day Ot sale. Innu.-uscO I�againat tiro and wirdctorr ie req,uirod Ln an a^ovnt equal to the race of acid noto or tt•.o hi11..inaurable valve of tha ir..provamento, uLlabover 15 sral.lor, and the policy or polloleo aau,t be placed with the bcncftclarp harwrder, All szO ,match's are horoby vaived. Witneaa the folloving sisro-turns and noala. FCiFJX T. CALIADAY (SF -AL) loom COLUM (Seel.) Sts.to of Virginia, CMMty of Frederick, to-vltc I, Hoyrn.^d S, Harria, a Notary Public of and for the juriadicti eforoeal.d, wt:och cG=A anon oxp4^aa :icr. 27, 1963, haroby earthy that Erman T. �Qo1la9ay and louice Oolladay whose nrarna are ai6rad to the foregoing vriting dated Docarnber 2, 15�59, bavo ackno+lodged the oLmo befw^o me in Bald jurizdlction. Given unlar w ham UUB Sth day of DDae_:bar, 1959. '..'IIiQIHIA FRWERICE Comm, (SCT. fThin lrutrumaat of vrittng was yroduoa,d to me = the 7tn day of Tanaary 1960 at 11:45 A. M. and with ccrtiricate of acimovledgnnt thereto annexed van admitted to record.. � zr!c Yj txr-f1f�,r��,clr,�uc cr•r•..•+++r e.e+e.•.•Kse.y r•w•r• er•e d'15 CRD.'IIL RICSiARD BCE, LT 07t MUS L=, made ccd dated this tend day or December, 1959, by Ond botvoen Crovall Richard Bryce and Oraae S. Doyce, hie wire, partioa of the first part, and RDy A. boyoo and Iva t5eo Bowles, Snrtios of tlw e000nd Smart. WIIi Fa=, by dood dated Septe tor 27, 1924, Of record 1n tiw Clerk'a Ottice of the Circuit Court ar Fradoria''L County, Virginia, in Dosd Hook 152, at Fagv 278, Hugb 9, Lupton and vita ocnveyed tc H. F. Boyce (sass au Harmon P. 9Dy00) and i.1]a M. Boyce, Jointly and in equal pnopartions, tba real astato • `1543, la cis aforesaid C_ork's CTrioo, and thareLl recc;dad in Will book 55, at 437, which will warvidod :n Fr_ri ao foi:we: . .... .... ... S..2witta.ilk..of..aW._aetata,and-persona-.grapartY..4R lryy hurband, Haadcr. P. Bayet, and at h10 death tc our thren children, C^a✓e11 hScha-d Boyce, Roy Racoy Ba,{ao " Iva Mso BOV16e, to stvire arx3 Ohara alike"; nni, Wtff1MA.5, Namicr. P. Bayou died on the 18th dAv of coptoobor,1958, 2oaving a ibnt Will and TOatJ,aamr,, dated Ncver.,ber 18, JC39, probatod Novea,ber 18, 2958, in the aforooald Clerk's Drflce and tberolr. recorded in Will book 6,5, at Page 76, vhich vlll providad in part as follova, •I leave all mV aatate, both real and poraonal property to cy 'wife, Elie Boy", and et her death tc our three children, an=11, Crowell Rltbard Boyne, Boy Racey 9oyao urd Iva Mara Bavlear' end, vnm�„-., the mt:,tu Grantor tan armed to dell and cosrny 41.5 undivibed ore-thiSC interest in arid realty to the Grantees. j;W' 2MUY'0?3, T4iIS rM VIT7RSSEE i'it That the Grid parties of thr f:.ret part, for and in cencidaration of the rum or Tva Dollars (�10.00) and other good and valuable considoration tc tboa in hand jr-" try the Bald parties of the second ,".art, et and barer, the execution and delivery of tt_'a deed, the MCC-'Pt is hereby acknovlodeed, do taretF'brant and c=voy, vith geoarel warranty of t:tlo, unto the oaid partiee of the eeoa,d part and thou reopootivo heire and laeaigt. forever us tcaanty Sn ooamon in equal oharoa, all of the .ralo Unentor'e , right, title and inLoraet both at low and in equity, being en undividod one-thi.^d 4 interest rrn rod in and to all of ttat cortaln tract or parcel of laril vitb tho bulICIinge and 1=provocnnta thereon and tho eppurto.-au-xas tharounto bolarging, t eltuated in 9tonovnll District, Fredariak County, Virginia, about eigLt m1lon Narth� from Winchootar on both eldee of the WInchastor and i+artlnaburg Turnplka, adjo/s11ng(; tho lando cf W2.111as Dorsey, J. V. Piley and otiwrs, containing one hurulred and 1� tvanty-o+..x (126) acror and two (2) roodr, according to a plat and Guryoy of the 'ill eons tade by D. W. Brnrreoc a,j tho 14th day of ApIl, 1902, and which Sa ai record in rho Clerk+c QPfice of the aforoaald County or Fredoriak in Used (took Ho. 122, page 3.2, A,nd the aforesaid stale P^antor Covenants that rw is Geirad of en isullvided arm -third interoat is, and to Bald Iw1d dad has the right to convoy tho na= to the aforesaid Grentooe; that oaid Uranteoo sha11 have ptLiat pacaooalon ar ,aid tuldlvided irtarost, free from all nncu.�rtuxas; dad that no will oxoouto ouch 'urther aaourancoo of aald undivldod irtor>aat ea may bo requisite. VIMaSS the following ■igruturao and ooala; 'WFe'YIIE STAMP. 11.00 �IiGE1.IS'D CnOWEI1, HICRARD HGYC'g (3Pgy)I [LIA= E. BWCE ma) State ar vlrgint.a. County or rredorlLk, to-v1t! I, Nancy D. RuJVcke a Notary Public of and for the Btete and County aforwcnle, d0 cortify that Crowell, Richard Boyne aril Greco R. Boyce, tie vita, vhnao rta.7,oa cry oigs,od to tl:c foregoing SrJtru=at, bearing date or, tiro 22nd dcy of Docor-bor, 1959, have ao;rr,ovledgod tt5 care before me in WA State add Count' .............._-................................ e erraaY of ei• GYarr elawe . .M... .. ..... .. . .,..�gf. t.....R... ..... I..;.D��" I ROY RI: BOYCE,^, JR. « SNN441 � II 11iS 1M k�leY trR�l cal ass eea0ef I awuae a ra YYreoY ' •nYum o ue ' 1 N eoef 334 mu 469 P =8 1 E0, =Ada this Q_ day or 8bgust, 1967, botvecn Hoy H. Boyce and Pmarl V. Boyce, his wife, of the sea past, harcimnfter called tba' . I Grantors, and Hoy Hilcy Boyco, Jr., of the other part, harc:ar.Ster ct led the Graates. VITYMEM II: That -for end in canaidarntioA of the ewe of Tan Dollars caeb in hand paid and other velurblo eonnidcrction, receipt %hereof is hereby ackaovladged, the Creators do grant and cenvcy, vith General Warranty Of Title, uato the Grtatea, in fee sicple. &11 that certain triangular tract of land situated smut eight (8) a11ea Tlortb of Ninrhaster iA 8toaevall Hagiaterial District, FredcriaL County, Virg-i.nim, eoatrtlLixL& 18 tcroa, more or loss, bonded op the East by Interstate Routo 81, on the 800ttvest by Fred Ridgeway Lad on the Nortbvsat by Souther, and bout the vestera portion of the land allotted to the trlala 0mater heroic by Order of the Judge of tbo Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, and recorded Yarch 29, 1967, Sn the Clerk's Otfi.cc of the aforesaid Circuit Court in Deed Book 330, at:Faga 679, and furUer being a portion of the land oaaveyed to E. F. Boyce sad Ells +(.'Boyce, jmintly, by dacd recorded in the rSnreaaid Clerk's Office in Deed A>oe'1$2, at Page P78, both of whoa willed their interest in'aald land to their three (3) chillren, Hay R. Boyce, Crowell Richert+ Boyce and Iva Hoe Bcrlea, Crowell. Richard Boyascoaveyed hie Interact to the said ctbmr tw (2) children h; deed recorded in the aforesaid Clerk's Offiea in Dead Book 261, at Page 237. Tuc interest of Iva Mae BovIce was conveyed to Roy R. Boyce by Rrdc' of the Court as or=,*- caid. p refore we to the aforesaid deeds and ordera and to the references therein contained is hury rods for a further end =rc particular description of'the realty hereby conveyed, Thin aanvsynnoa is r 1 subject to all legally caferocabin restrictive coveaanta and mamemeats o: record, if any, atieeting the aforesaid realty. TOO Orantors COY==t that they have the right to convey acid realty to the armAteeaj that the Orortaec shall have quiet posaoaaico thareef, free , ^,V,• a ro• ^rtsn eoxt 3;d ram' 4?0 rcc all cvczraceeal that thoy liavt done un act to enc=ber void realty and scat they wall arorute gush further aasuraaeaa tbcreof av =y be requieite, "0 fol3.oving cignaturee and acalal BEAL> m"m OF V=IPIA, COUTM or `REMEr'CK, To•vitt . notan' R'=21e cf and for the Btate sad County aforesaid, do certify that Roy R. Boyce and pearl P. Boyce, his vite,. t6oee nacca are aigced to the roreguing Saatrct=t, bearing ddc on the Q .. day of August, 1967, have aatnOvledEed the aa= baforc z= im tY M&tc sad CO sty aforvp dd. G i�•cii "_ar g' hand thie —2^ day. of A-9.t, 1957. W cac3ctiw /q _/9G,7. ie, Wt6C4A COUNTY. SQ. at � �pY , ��'7 Mvo ProA+crd h w to liij —•�'+. �Y of '� +, to nmrd ,rod wil . Z _ w,n„ a Jltl.rnY n al W I! 1 +7 AML .ems R9t' A. yll l 3T 19 TOE H4•; Dw CEC31 (tM A. •BC R ET UR btl Ofpf •f!f lbi �f Of4ff4ffY ^ - tool 372 rut 13 T= DAD, -do this f 3Y'6 d* or Aoccabor, 1970, between flay R. Boyce and Pearl Y. Royea, hie wifa, of the one part, hercinatter called the Granters and Cre l A. Boyce and Joyce yL Beyco, hie vise, of the other pact, herein- after ca13od the Oranteec. WIVE6 M11 That for and it oonoidoratior. of the sum of Ten Dollars caah in hand paid and other velaable concidoration, receipt rlaereof In hereby exknovledged, the Grantor: do grant and comay, with Gcnoral Warranty of Title, unto tho Dranteaa, as tenants by the entirety, in rea aiapte, with survivorship as at co=n Inv, all tbat eartair, tract or parcel of land, containing eight (8) acres, core or leas (but tbia it a sale in gross and not by the acre), together vitb all rights, prlvilegeo, appurttnancas and imprvvecants thcraunto belonging, lying and being aituato *about one and ono - half (11) miles }forth of Claarbrwk in gtonevall Hagiatorial Dietrict, Frederick County, Yiroinla, fronting a distance of 190 feet on the Matt nido of U. 8. Route 11, adjoining the lands of Henry B. Cline on tho South (with a coon bowidary line 9ra.94 feet long'axteadiug fro: U. G. Routo al tc the Limited Acetic Right or Way Line of Interstate Route 81); bounded on the Watt by the said Mr-ited Access Right of Way Line of interstate Route 811 bounded on the Forth by Virginia Daeandery itotd Ho, and the-lar,da of Manuel DtHaven; and bounded on the East by the said laid or Manuel Deftaver. and U. S. Route 11, mtd being a portion of that cer'.ain larger tract of land conveyed to H. F. Boyce and Ella H. Boyce, jointly, by deed recardod ir. the DYicc of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia, in Deed Rook 152, at Page M, both of vh= villed their interest in said land to Choir thrto (3) children, Roy R. Boyce, Crowell Richard Boyce and Iva Rae Bovlea. Cravell Rirriard Boyce conveytd hia interest to the acid other tvo (2) childrer. by dead recorded In the aforeaaid Clerk's Office in Dead Book 261, at ,Pago 237, The Interact ,of Iva Hae bovlef was conveyed to Roy R. Boyce by Ordor of the Judge of the Oircuit court of Trsdarick County, Yirginia, recorded March 291 1967, in the Clerk'a Ofrico of the aioreaold Circuit Court is Deed Book 14 r , j j �1 n i IJ t AN 372 rArt 14 330, at Page 6791 and.farthor being all of the said larger tract vhlob waa conveyed to the said H, P. Boyce, which 11e6 9tsC of U. D. Route 11, Wert of Interstate Route 01 and ?forth or that certain eO.82 Aor6 tract oonvayed by the Orantors herein to Ranry B. Cline, at ux, by deed dated October 31, 1967, and duly recorded in tho Aforesaid Clerk's Office in Deed Beck 336, At Page L74. A reftrenee t0 the aforesaid deeds and order and to the raferencee contained there!Sn is btre rado for a further aad earn particular daocription or the realty hereby conveyed. This deed in exprosaly subject to a?easements of rseord, if Any, arrecting said realty, lb Grantors covenant that they have, the right to convey, said roclty to the Orantoes; that the Orantsoe ahali have, quiet poseeasion thereof, froc frx All encusbranceal the% they bavo done no act to oncuaoer acid realty and that they will execute such rw ther Assurances thereof as ony be requisite. VITSMS the fo'_SovSne signatures and nealsf (am) R. /cac Pearl Y. Boyce =TE Or VIROmmIA, COMIn OF TREMUCK, Tb-vit: 1, ��, , a Rotary Public of and for the 11tats end County aforesaid, do certify that Ray R. Boyce and Pearl Y. Boyce, bin wife, whose namea are signed to the foregoing inatrwmant, boariag date on the —any of Docamber, 1970, MYC aek,wwlodgod tha aamue barora roe in cy State and County aforesaid. Given under tW Mad this f6n day of Doember, 1970. M9 cmnalesien w0iroa OIL' -ft I-V /27( 'notary rOMIC V.RaWLA FSEDMICK CJuxy, Sm Tab iasirumshl p��r-�rj1j�ag was produced to me, on tha 15�-y of VP Q:.:= , 1,Q 0 , a! I (;'Fe, A.lN. aml with CoracZ 01 dc«aowwamoai !horato aaaa Cal rrta adsiltlad ID r.,Coorrd. TQ% raf?aud 4/ S.a, dd•a4.1 01 f -1, , and S=-tW havo boon psid, U ano,vablo, ' 4-vfJu_ C1ork G I r-nmea vn U4s17U![UU6 fay IxIAV tNG1NELHING —0 G7 co I, ROY RILEY BOYCE, of Frederick County, Virginia, do make, publish and declare this to be my Last Will and Testament, hereby revoking any and all wills and codicils heretofore made by me. 1. I direct that all my just debts, taxes and funeral expense, including the reasonable cost of a suitable marker for my grave, be paid as soon as practicable by my Executrix, hereinafter named, and I authorize my Executrix to dispose of such of my property, real or personal, as in her discretion shall be necessary for these purposes without regard to any rule of law which might otherwise require exhausting personalty before using realty for these purposes. 2. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, real, personal and mixed, wherever situate, I give, devise and bequeath to my daughters, Robin Lynn. —Boyce and Kay Marie Boyce, equally, share and share alike, or to the survivor, to be hers absolutely, should either of my said daughters predecease me. 3. I nominate and appoint my daughter, Ray Marie Boyce, to be Executrix of this my Last Will and Testament and direct that she be exempt from giving surety upon her official bond. 4. In addition to all other powers granted by law, I grant and confer to my Executrix all powers enumerated and conferred by 1 64.1-57 of the Code of Virginia of 1950, as amended, which is hereby specifically incorporated herein in whole by this reference. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this l3�G1, day of , 1995. A )(� /�' Z�"- , YAL) Roy R ey oq a ,! The 1'nrroni•no nionni nra nF tin Tumor + — a_ ..,._ r11111VU UII UO/I(JUUUO by IH1HU t/V(zM\ttHINU 'V W) O foregoing Will was acknowledged to be his Last Will and Testament, bye the Testator, in the presence of us, two (2) competent witnesses, present at the same time; and we, the said witnesses, do hereunto subscribe the said Will on the date last above -written, in the presence of the Testator and of each other, at the request of the said Testator, who was then of sound mind and over the age of eighteen (18) years. V STATE OR VIRGIRIA AT LARGE, OF Y&J, To -wit: Before me, the undersigned authority, on this day, personally ap eared Roy Riley Boyce, and know to me to be the Testator and w tnesses, respectively; whose names are signed to the foregoing instrument and, all of these persons being by me first duly sworn, Roy Riley Boyce, the Testator, declared to me and to the witnesses, in my .presence, that said instrument is his Last Will and Testament and that he had willingly signed the same, and executed it in the presence of the said witnesses as his free and voluntary act for the purposes therein expressed; that said witnesses stated before me that the foregoing Will was executed and acknowledged by the Testator as his Last Will and Testament in the presence of said witnesses who, in his presence and at his request, and in the presence of each other, did subscribe their names.thereto as attesting witnesses on the day of the date of said Will, and that the Testator, at the time of the execution of said Will, was over the age of -111— Ulf UO/ IU/GUUO tlY 1 MALd CJVbliVCtK11VU Subscribed, sworn and acknowledged before me by Roy Riley Boyce, o A. s.0 the Testator, and -- �� Y and o ` , witnesses, this 147�1� day of 19 . My commission expires Cil�) J/ �9`J1' i - NoIt,-ry Public - 3 - • STATEMENT VERIFYING TAXES HAVE BEEN PAID ListTickets Page 1 of 1 Real Estate Public Inquiry Results for Name - JBOYEE ROBIN LYNN &KAY MARIE Dept Ticket# Seel# Account# Due mate Marne Description Balance Details RB2002 286 1 6491 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK 2002 50.00 Details RB2003 218 1 6491 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2003 50.00 Details RB2004 157 1 6491 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2004 S0.00 Details RB2005 101 1 6491 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2005 50.00 Details RB2006 49 1 6491 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2006 $0.00 Details RB2007 20 1 6491 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2007 $0.00 Details ViewBill RE2007 3430 1 6491 6/5/2007 BOYCE ROSIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 16.52 ACRES 50.00 Details RE2007 3430 2 6491 12/5/2007 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 16.52 ACRES 50.00 Details ViewBill RE2008 3774 1 6491 6/5/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 16.52 ACRES $0.00 Details RE2008 3774 2 6491 12/5/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 16.52 ACRES 58.95 1 t:- Show Description Show Map# Note that if payment has been received within the last 10 business days, any returned items may not be posted at this time. Please check the website again. Total Due 1 $8.95 Previous U 0 https://taxes. co. frederick.va.uslapplicationsIREPublicInquirylListTickets. aspx 6/19/2008 WebForm 1 Page 1 of 1 2008 Real Estate Tax Bill COUNTY OF FREDERICK P.O. BOX 225 I �•` �r WINCHESTER, VA 22604-0225 \�. C. WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE Department - RE2008 PO BOX 67 CLEAR BROOK VA 22624-0067 Account # - 6491 Property Id - 33 A 109 Click here for Additional Info Ticket# - 3774 Total "Parable Description of Property Acres Lend E`al1lC Land Use Improvements Mineral Value Assessed 16.52 ACRES 16..52 99,100 3,408 3,408 Previous Version n: 1.0.3085.26139 Printer Friendly Page Tax Rate per $100 - .5250 Tax Due on 06/05/2008 - $8.95 t Tax Due on 12/05/2008 - $8.95 Total Annual Tax - $17.90 Pay Ohline Now Printin Tlns https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/TR ebill_RElwebforml.aspx?dpt=RE2008&tck=3774&FRQ=1 6/19/2008 ListTickets Page 1 of 1 Real Estate Public Inquiry Results for Name - 1139YCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE Dept Tickets Seq# Account# Due Bate Name Description Balance Details RB2002 287 1 6492 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK 2002 $0.00 Details RB2003 219 1 6492 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2003 $0.00 Details R132004 158 1 6492 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2004 $0.00 Details RB2005 102 1 6492 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2005 $0.00 Details RB2006 50 1 6492 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2006 $0.00 Details RB2007 21 1 6492 1/4/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE ROLLBACK TAXES 2007 $0.00 Details ViewBill RE2007 3431 1 6492 6/5/2007 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 49.00 ACRES 50.00 Details RE2007 3431 2 6492 12/5/2007 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 49.00 ACRES $0.00 Details ViewBill RE2008 3775 1 6492 6/5/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 49.00 ACRES $0.00 Details RE2008 3775 2 6492 12/5/2008 BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 49.00 ACRES S1,087.27 1 (-- Show Description t^ Show Map# Note that if payment has been received within the last 10 business days; any returned items may not be posted at this time. Please check the website again. Total Due $1,087.27 Previous U https://taxes. co. frederick.va.uslapplicationsIREPublicInquirylListTickets. aspx 6/19/2008 WebForml Page 1 of l 2008 Real Estate Tax Bill COUNTY OF FREDERICK P.O. BOX 225 WINCIiESTER, VA 22604-0225 C. WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE Department - RE2008 PO BOX 67 CLEAR BROOK VA 22624-0067 Account # - 6492 Property Id - 33 A 110 Click here for Additional Info Ticket# - 3775 Total'Faxable Description ofPropertv Acres Land. Value Land Use Improvemenls Mineral Value Assessed 49.00 ACRES 49..00 325,000 71,800 342,400 414,200 Previousjx Version#: 1.0.3085.? 6139 Printer. Friendly Pane Tax Rate per $100 - .5250 Tax Due on 06/05/2008 - $1,087.28 Tax Due on 12/05/2008 - $1,087.27 Total Annual Tax - $2,174.55 Pay On.Line, Now Printing Tip-s i https://taxes.co.frederick.va.us/applications/TR ebill_RE/webforml.aspx?dpt=RE2008&tck=3775&FRQ=1 6/19/2008 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SURVEY AND DEED b—dao :j•gwnN buowua G m m0 m m co r- 5 -D CD�� m �, D Z m c� Do r U) � �m z_ Z D 1 1 I I I I I I Z . I I I Iw w I U Q W cn �Divai �LL <�Q I W LL m1= w m Z o x > w1 �.. >. �9N `a O �. a a <a I _I¢I a a Inl I I I I N I �I I1 III (301M ,09) 11 '-La 'S'(1 ---------- - - ----- �-F��ltvlrleU;gllal� D;I:►'•��a�14�:1 d iHnoo NonHi ooz NI-3AIH0 Nh3AIH0 I \ OVd 313HON00--�, I I S30VdS OL l=03(11AOHd 3SnOH38VM 'd'S 000'04L 00'009 i' 311 I :,a: a: W w w LL 00'0921 Imlw W I� L) lz NI-3AIH0 ------------------------ IN. ---OVd 3138ON00ti I I NI-3AIUD --�JNIAVd 1lVHdSV -- I 1Hnoo>fonHl ooz SAMS 59 X Z l ) 'dS 00 W E)NINHVd H311VH1 o\�� (S312JVA M/d) 18-1 ��d LS — — — — _ _ _ — — — — — — — 200' 200' O - PROPOSED 1V PEDESTRIAN TIWL - - - — — — — — — — -- — —_ — — — — — — N —_— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — a RAI9FD kM0SCo6EME[}uw , �• J Tye CT- - - - - .� - CGJ r` a R R 17% F 1 E-, .-* '� i ikiS; COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/ 665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Finance Department FROM: Pam Deeter, Office Assistant II SUBJECT: Return Of Sign Deposit DATE: October 31, 2008 The amount of $100.00 was deposited in line item #3-010-019110-0008. Executive Land Holding had a deposit for two signs for Rezoning 405-08 for I-81 Distribution Center. The company has returned the signs and is therefore entitled to the return of the deposit. You may pay this through the regular bill cycle. Please send a check in the amount of $100.00 to: Executive Land Holding 770 Township Rd Suite 150 Yardly, PA 19067 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 r DATE 4�i 31 U NO. 0789 RECEIVED FROM count ADDRESS 1�..;�f` �� s% �S=\�"T: [q0 i i6,000.00 r ��:1—tee✓"��ls,. y ��` vo DOLLARS $ �(� o• 16,000.00 JFOR RENT JFOR _ r, AMT OF ACCOUNT CASH AMT. PAID l CHECK BALANCE MONEY DUE ORDER BY � `✓ �_p 1' �A 10 - -y 1\ L L 1 L 1 ,e• �o .'REDERICK COUNTY C. WILLIAM ORNDOFF, JR . p.0. BOX 225 Z/ WINCHESTER VA 22604-0225 SIGN DEPOSITS PLANNING PLANNING 0 Date 6/23/2008 Register: JKH/LKHS3 Trans. #: 16241 Dept # 1095 Acct# Previous 100.00 Balance $ 100.00 $ Principal Being Paid � .00 Penalty $ .00 Interest $ Amount Paid $ 100.00 *Balance Due $ .00 Check 17350.00 # VARIOUS Pd by PLANNING BALANCE DUE INCLUDES PENALTY/INTEREST THRU THE MONTH 6/20 I I 6 ,m L 2 5 2008 WALSH COLUCCI LUBELEY EMRICH & WALSH PC John H. Foote (703) 680-4664 Ext. 114 jfoote@pw.thelandlawyers.com Fax: (703) 680-2161 July 23, 2008 June Wilmot, Chairman 412 Westside Station Drive Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Proffer Revision for B-3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33-A-110 and 33-A-109 Dear Ms. Wilmot: My firm represents BPG Properties, Ltd., in connection with the rezoning from RA to B-3 of TM #'s 33-A-109 and 33-A-110. This case is schedule for a public hearing before the Frederick County Planning Commission on August 6, 2008. We have spoken to Eric Lawrence, Director, Department of Planning and Development, and understand that the Planning Commission's packet for the August 6th meeting has been dispatched. BPG has been in discussions with various County officials, and pursuant to those discussions, has agreed to modify the Proffer Statement. Pursuant to Mr. Lawrence's recommendation, we are enclosing a clean version of a Proffer Statement with a revision date of July 21, 2008, and a blackline version of the Proffer Statement reflecting the changes made to the Proffer Statement dated June 19, 2008. Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss this matter further, and we appreciate your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH & WALSH, P.C. ohn H. Foote Cc: Eric Lawrence Michael Ruddy ✓ BPG Properties, Ltd. Mike Ruddy 6'8 �IY�Ti From: Coughlin, Michael J. [mcoughlin@pw.thelandlawyers.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 4:20 PM To: rmitchell@hallmonahan.com Cc: elawrenc@co.frederick.va.us; mruddy@co.frederick.va.us; Foote, John Subject: BPG Proffers Attachments: B3 Proffer Statement (July 21, 2008 Blackline) (P0099214).DOC; 133 Proffer Statement (July 21, 2008) (P0098137).DOC <<B3 Proffer Statement (July 21, 2008 Blackline) (P0099214).DOC>> <<B3 Proffer Statement (July 21, 2008) (P0098137).DOC>> Bob --attached are the proffers that we have sent to the County which Eric has now received. The blackline shows our changes to the original proffers dated Tune 19, 2008, submitted with the application. We are also sending these proffers to each individual Planning Commission Member. We will not be changing the proffers further between now and the Commission's meeting on August 6th. The changes to the version you last received are to address comments we received regarding sharing in the cost of relocating the entrance to the site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Michael 7. Coughlin Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh, P.C. 4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300 Woodbridge, VA 22192 (p) 703-680-4664 (f) 703-680-2161 (c) 202-494-2813 mcoughlin(a@pw.thelandlawyers.com This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail and delete all copies of the message. Thank you very much. TRANSMITTAL FETTER • �:qJAD TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering ' Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Services • Land Surveying Construction Testing & Monitoring ' Drilling Water & Wastewater ' Landscape Architecture 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 667-9300 (540) 667-2260 facsimile www.triadeng.com To: Frederick Co. Planning & Development Date: 26 August 2008 107 N. Kent Street Re: 1-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Proffers Winchester, VA 22601 Project No.: Attn: Michael Ruddv WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: I COPIES 1 DATED NUMBER I DESCRIPTION I 1 08-25-08 1 Proffer Statement for the 1-81 Distribution Center THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For Approval ❑ For Your Use AUK 2 F 2008 ❑ As Requested ® For Review and Comment ❑ Other REMARKS COPY TO: SIGNED: 0'. D �;;� : =J Dennie D. Dunlap III If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. T R A N S M I T T A L fA T T E R Is �%M:11 i) TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC. Civil Engineering • Geotechnical Engineering Environmental Services • Land Surveying Construction Testing & Monitoring • Drilling Water & Wastewater I Landscape Architecture To: Frederick Co. Planning & Development 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Attn: Michael Ruddv WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 (540) 667-9300 (540) 667-2260 facsimile www.triadeng.com Date: 26 August 2008 Re: 1-81 Distribution Center Rezoning Proffers Project No.: COPIES DATED NUMBER I DESCRIPTION 1 08-25-08 1 Proffer Statement for the 1-81 Distribution Center THESE ARE TRANSMITTED: ❑ For Approval ❑ As Requested ❑ Other ❑ For Your Use ® For Review and Comment REMARKS AUr, 2 R 2008 COPY TO: SIGNED: Z) �Lv Dennie D. Dunlap III If attachments are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. • John H. Foote (703) 680-4664 Ext. 114 ifoote@pw.thelandlawyers.com Fax: (703) 680-2161 WALSH COLUCCI LUBELEY EMRICH & WALSH PC September 17, 2008 Michael Ruddy Deputy Director of Planning and Development Frederick County, Virginia 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 S E P 1 8 2008 Re: Proffer Revision for B-3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33-A-110 and 33-A-109 Dear Mike Enclosed please find one original executed Proffer Statement for the above referenced application dated September 17, 2008, for inclusion in the agenda packet for the Board of Supervisors' meeting on September 24, 2008. Also enclosed is a blackline version of the Proffer Statement reflecting changes made to the August 25, 2008, version. Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss this matter further, and we appreciate your assistance. Sincerely yours, WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY. E ICH & WALSH, P.C. //-.,��� z- Jo H. Foote PHONE 703 680 4664 1 FAX 703 68o 6o67 I WWW.THELANDLAWYERS.COM GLEN PARK 1 1 4310 PRINCE WILLIAM PARKWAY, SUITE 300 1 PRINCE WILLIAM, VA 22192-5199 ARLINGTON OFFICE 703 528 4700 1 LOUDOUN OFFICE 703 737 3633 (P0103287.DOC / 1 Prober Submission Letter 9.17.08 006260 000002} 1 1. N I I %%% WALSH COLUCCI JUL 2 5 2M LUBELEY EMRICH & WALSH PC John H. Foote (703) 680-4664 Ext. 114 jfoote@pw.thelandlawyers.com Fax: (703) 680-2161 July 23, 2008 Eric R. Lawrence 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Re: Proffer Revision for B-3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33-A-110 and 33-A-109 Dear Mr. Lawrence: My firm represents BPG Properties, Ltd., in connection with the rezoning from RA to B-3 of TM #'s 33-A-109 and 33-A-110. This case is schedule for a public hearing before the Frederick County Planning Commission on August 6, 2008. We have spoken to Eric Lawrence, Director, Department of Planning and Development, and understand that the Planning Commission's packet for the August 6`h meeting has been dispatched. BPG has been in discussions with various County officials, and pursuant to those discussions, has agreed to modify the Proffer Statement. Pursuant to Mr. Lawrence's recommendation, we are enclosing a clean version of a Proffer Statement with a revision date of July 21, 2008, and a blackline version of the Proffer Statement reflecting the changes made to the Proffer Statement dated June 19, 2008. Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss this matter further, and we appreciate your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH & WALSH, P.C. t�,A� h �V-tlqjt-q H. Foote Cc: Eric Lawrence Michael Ruddy BPG Properties, Ltd. i John H. Foote (703) 680-4664 Ext. 114 jfoote@pw.thelandlawyers.com Fax: (703) 680-2161 WALSH COLUCCI yy�p LUBELEY EMRICH JUL 2 3 20 & WALSH PC July 21, 2008 Via First Class Mail Eric Lawrence Fred. Co. Dept. Of Planning & Development North Building, 2nd Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Re: Signed Proffer Statement for B-3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33-A- 110 and 33-A-109 Enclosed please find a signed Proffer Statement associated with the above referenced case dated June 19, 2008, with a revision date of July 3, 2008. We are submitting these pursuant to the request of Mr. Ruddy and the Department's standard practice. Also enclosed is an unsigned Proffer Statement dated June 19, 2008, with a revision date of July 21, 2008. I have also enclosed a blackline version of the Proffer Statement reflecting the changes made to the enclosed signed Proffer Statement. BPG Properties, Ltd. has agreed to share in the costs associated with constructing the future entrance to the property that would align with Branson Spring Road. Proffers 3.3 and 3.4 have been revised accordingly. We are going to wait to submit another signed Proffer Statement until just prior to the Board hearing because, as you know, there may be a need to further revise the Statement. Please do not hesitate to contact me to discuss this matter further, and we appreciate your attention to this matter. Sincerely yours, WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH & W H, .C. H. Foote Cc: Charles DeHaven, Jr. Michael Ruddy BPG Properties, Ltd. PHONE 703 680 4664 1 FAX 703 68o 6o67 1 WWW.I'HELANI)I.AWYERS.COM 4310 PRINCE WILLIAM PARKWAY, SUITE 300 1 PRINCE WILLIAM, VA 22192 ARLINGTON OFFICE 703 528 4700 1 LOUDOUN OFFICE 703 737 3633 ATTORNEYS AT LAW w ft WALSH COLUCCI LUBELEY EMRICH & WALSH PC Michael J. Coughlin (703) 680-4664 Ext. 113 mcoughlin a pw.thelandlawyers.com Fax: (703) 680-2161 June 19, 2008 Via Federal Express Eric Lawrence Fred. Co. Dept. Of Planning & Development North Building, 2" d Floor 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia Re: B-3 Rezoning Application for TM #'s 33-A-110 and 33-A-109 Enclosed please find the above referenced rezoning application, which includes the following materials: • Application form; • A check made payable to "Treasurer of Frederick County" in the amount of $16,000.00 • B-3 Proffer Statement dated June 19, 2008; • Applicant's Impact Statement with Traffic Impact Analysis materials included. • Table of agency comments with the Applicant's response; • Completed agency continent sheets (or letters) from the following agencies: • Legal Description, survey and deed; • Statement verifying taxes have been paid; and • List of adjoining property owners. We request that this application be placed on the next available Planning Commission public hearing agenda. Thank you and your staff for all of your assistance in this matter. Best regards, WALSH, COLUCCI, LUBELEY, EMRICH & WALSH, P.C. AI�2-- Michael J. Coughlin PHONE 7o3 680 4664 1 FAx 7o3 68o 6o67 1 WWW.-I-HEI.ANI)I.AWYEItS.COM 4310 PRINCE WILLIAM PARKWAY, SUITE 300 1 PRINCE WILLIAM, VA 22192 ARLINGTON OFFICE 703 528 4700 1 LOUDOUN OFFICE 703 737 3633 ATTORNEYS AT LAW 0 0 SYNCHRO Worksheets 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out onditions_AM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/1112008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations +T+ 4 T +T r Volume (vph) 44 0 19 9 0 6 85 494 7 5 776 199 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.960 0.944 0.998 0.850 Fit Protected 0.966 0.971 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1707 0 1770 1859 0 0 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.781 0.816 0.273 0.997 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1397 0 0 1435 0 509 1859 0 0 1857 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 21 7 3 221 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 753 8030 5500 Travel Time (s) 15.6 17.1 182.5 125.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 49 0 21 10 0 7 94 549 8 6 862 221 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 70 0 0 17 0 94 557 0 0 868 221 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perm Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 6 Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 6 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out onditions_AM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL' SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 14.0 14.0 0.0 14.0 14.0 0.0 66.0 66.0 0.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 Total Split (%) 17.5% 17.5% 0.0% 17.5% 17.5% 0.0% 82.5% 82.5% 0.0% 82.5% 82.5% 82.5% Maximum Green (s) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 60.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 8.6 8.6 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.11 0.79 0.79 0.79 0.79 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.11 0.23 0.38 0.59 0.17 Control Delay 32.0 25.1 5.5 4.7 7.2 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 32.0 25.1 5.5 4.7 7.2 0.9 LOS C C A A A A Approach Delay 32.0 25.1 4.8 5.9 Approach LOS C C A A 90th %ile Green (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 12.2 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 55.8 90th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 58.2 58.2 58.2 58.2 58.2 70th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 8.2 8.2 8.2 8.2 59.8 59.8 59.8 59.8 59.8 50th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 6.6 6.6 6.6 6.6 61.4 61.4 61.4 61.4 61.4 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 74.0 10th %ile Term Code Skip Skip Skip Skip Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 23 5 11 78 161 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 59 22 36 153 323 17 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 673 7950 5420 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) 180 172 409 1494 1492 1316 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.10 0.23 0.37 0.58 0.17 intersection Summary Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 50 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 0 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out onditions_AM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.59 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.6% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min)15 Splits and Phases: 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 o2 o4 66s 14s 1 06 *— 08 66s 14s Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 -81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Condiitons_PM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL ' WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations + + T� *T r Volume (vph) 168 0 72 6 0 5 24 929 11 2 633 56 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 0 0 150 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.960 0.938 0.998 0.850 Flt Protected 0.966 0.974 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 1727 0 0 1702 0 1770 1859 0 0 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.784 0.833 0.282 0.996 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 1402 0 0 1455 0 525 1859 0 0 1855 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 37 6 1 62 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 686 802 7981 5500 Travel Time (s) 15.6 18.2 181.4 125.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Adj. Flow (vph) 187 0 80 7 0 6 27 1032 12 2 703 62 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 267 0 0 13 0 27 1044 0 0 705 62 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Yes Yes Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Perm Perm Perm Perm Perrr Protected Phases 4 8 2 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 E Detector Phase 4 4 8 8 2 2 6 6 E Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 1 0 • 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Condiitons_PM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 44.0 0.0 44.0 44.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 0.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Total Split (%) 55.0% 55.0% 0.0% 55.0% 55.0% 0.0% 45.0% 45.0% 0.0% 45.0% 45.0% 45.0% Maximum Green (s) 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min C-Min Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 19.3 48.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.24 0.24 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.04 0.08 0.92 0.62 0.06 Control Delay 34.6 15.0 9.9 31.8 14.8 3.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 34.6 15.0 9.9 31.8 14.8 3.1 LOS C B A C B A Approach Delay 34.6 15.0 31.3 13.9 Approach LOS C B C B 90th %ile Green (s) 28.1 28.1 28.1 28.1 39.9 39.9 39.9 39.9 39.9 90th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 70th %ile Green (s) 22.9 22.9 22.9 22.9 45.1 45.1 45.1 45.1 45.1 70th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 50th %ile Green (s) 19.3 19.3 19.3 19.3 48.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 48.7 50th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 30th %ile Green (s) 15.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 52.3 30th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord 10th %ile Green (s) 10.7 10.7 10.7 10.7 57.3 57.3 57.3 57.3 57.3 10th %ile Term Code Gap Gap Hold Hold Coord Coord Coord Coord Coord Queue Length 50th (ft) 106 3 5 419 200 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 161 14 21 #851 413 18 Internal Link Dist (ft) 606 722 7901 5420 Turn Bay Length (ft) 150 Base Capacity (vph) 685 694 319 1131 1128 987 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.39 0.02 0.08 0.92 0.63 0.06 intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 80 Actuated Cycle Length: 80 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:NBTL and 6:SBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 70 Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 2 ! 0 1-81 Distribution Center 2010 Build -out Condiitons_PM 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 6/11/2008 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum vlc Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Splits and Phases: 24: Site -driveway & Route 11 I o2 — 0' o4 36s 44s m6 08 36 s 44 s Patton Harris Rust & Associates Synchro 7 - Report Page 3 E. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply The 1-81 Distribution Center site exists within the designated SWSA of Frederick County (see Figure 5). The FCSA has confirmed that they will provide water and sewer service to the site. A newly constructed 6-inch sanitary forcemain has been installed along the easterly side of Route 11. An on -site sanitary pumping station will be constructed for direct connection to the forcemain. There are no known limiting factors for the conveyance of sewage and sewage treatment fiom this property. Capacity and daily usage will be addressed at the time of site plan submission. Potable water and fire protection will be supplied via the 12-inch water line located along the easterly side of Route 11. The impact of the additional use created by this rezoning is acceptable and manageable. Figure 6 shows the locations of utility infiastructure planned in this phase of development. TA, 1 I I I 1 ( 1 oONp�O9�'�5O� vy,= i Ivz Y Y� CS INACTICE BUFF q y 1 Y Q.25'ACTIV€ U �— I U' B�q.._ 6t O 1 I � 1 ♦ ' I I � ♦ I I I I I I I • � � � I II I � ♦ I y I I I I I ( I I I I I ly 1 I 1' ♦ I I I 11 ♦\ • I 1 I I II I- o =E o I I v I o o � wr I I � oaaQo ¢ a` p NNa I 1 � IN' m�N s 8 as 1 lye wo I w I I I it I s I I I I I I a )5' INACBUE'� J I I J N/F I DONALD LEE BRAGGe I I _ 539/367 1 I 1 I I I NIF W � boo fF 1 I I t✓NPR 55 OR I ly' 1 LANE 69 I I I I-81 EDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA DISTRIBUTION IRGINIENTER rn FREDby Date110/24/06 Job No,107-06-0072 ft+t Number, TRW 04MINMRM, SITE SEWER AND WATER LAYOUT b Cadd file no,m Fleure 6 VDOCSTM, v�uua C e y SMSEVIDWaVA Scaler 11-300' 0 0 IDEALIZED ROUTE 11 CORRIDOR PER FREDERICK COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I � I � z Ia ; i o I o w I U O I 1� � w � 12' 12' 2' I QI I LLJ' wl I a� I U) i z QII � i I 40' 10, Zo"-G7, PUBLIC HEARING �Y ♦ .. BOARD ROOM .,FREDERICK CO. ADMIN. BLDG. v 665-5651 .. -INVI.. • z f C 'r-."UAL. . k �` { L, iM 1 REZONING PUBLIC HEARING BOARD ROOM FREDERICK CO ADMIN. BLDG 665-5651 t. ffl a I a 2DIH 0 • COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING September 10, 2008 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #05-08 FOR BPG PROPERTIES, LTDA-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER On behalf of the Frederick County Board of Supervisors, you are hereby notified of a public meeting being held on Wednesday, September 24, 2008, at 7:15 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 405-08 of BPG Properties, Ltd./I-81 Distribution Center, submitted by BPG Properties, Ltd., to rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers, for Office and Warehouse Uses. The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill Road (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 33-A-109 and 33-A-110. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Plarming Director MTR/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify tha t e attached correspondence was mailed to the following on t ©� from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 33 - A- - 87-B COOK DAVID C BPG Properties, Ltd. 4030 MARTINSBURG PIKE c/o Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh PC CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1536 4310 Prince William Parkway, Ste. 300 Prince William, VA 22192 33 - A- - 87- RUSSELL GLEN E & JUDY S 33 - A- - 109- BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE 2619 WOODSIDE RD PO BOX 67 CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.1355 CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.0067 33 - A- - 105-B 33 -A- - 111- MARTINSBURG PIKE ASSOCIATES LLC BRAGG DAVID LEE PO BOX 174 4150 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.0174 CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1534 33 - A- - 112- FAIRFIELD FARM OF FREDERICK COLLC 2897 MARTINSBURG PIKE STEPHENSON VA 22656.1721 33 - A- - 108- CLINE DONALD S. 4123 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.1535 33 - A- - 86-A BOYCEKAY PO BOX 67 CLEARBROOK VA 22624-0067 �ilAlk,vr COUNTY OF FREDERICK Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Dire or Frederick County Planning Departmen I, C f ' , a Notary Public in and for the State and County aforesaid, do loreby certify that Miq,,yael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director for the Department of Pl �r6 anDevelopment, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated S , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my Stat and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this l day of My commission expires on \ BEVEL Rly H DELL INO R NOTARY ID # 331878 NOTARY PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 31, 2011 raw,rdizzz sw-4'a"M COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC MEETING September 5, 2008 TO: THE APPLICANT(S) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #05-08 FOR BPG PROPERTIES, LTDA-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public meeting being held on Wednesday, September 17, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning 405-08 of BPG Properties, Ltd./I-81 Distribution Center, submitted by BPG Properties, Ltd., to rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers, for Office and Warehouse Uses. The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 33-A-109 and 33-A-110. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Planning Director MTR/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify tliat the attached correspondence was mailed to the following on from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: 33 - A- - 87-B COOK DAVID C BPG Properties, Ltd. 4030 MARTINSBURG PIKE c/o Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh PC CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1536 4310 Prince William Parkway, Ste. 300 33 -A- - 87- Prince William, VA 22192 RUSSELL GLEN E & JUDY S 33 - A- - 109- BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE PO BOX 67 CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.0067 33 -A- -111- BRAGG DAVID LEE PO BOX 174 CLEARBROOK VA. 22624-0174 33 - A- - 112- FAIRFIELD FARM OF FREDERICK COLLC 2897 MARTINSBURG PIKE STEPHENSON VA 22656-1721 2619 WOODSIDE RD CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.1355 33 - A- - 105-B MARTINSBURG PIKE. ASSOCIATES LLC 4150 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA 22624-1534 33 - A- - 108- CLINE DONALD S. 4123 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.1535 33 - A- - fJd-A BOYCEKAY f Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Directof PO BOX 67 Frederick County Planning Department CLEARBROOK VA 22624.0067 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDERICK I, �d , a NotaryPublic in and for the State and County of resaid, d ereby certify that hael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director for the Department of Planni d Development, whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated 5 p , has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my State and County aforesaid. Given under my hand this �day of My commission expires on 8EVERLY H, DELLINGER NOTARY ID # 331878 NOTARY PUBLIC COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY31,2011 NOTARY WBLIC LI 0 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 NOTIFICATION OF PUBLIC HEARING July 25, 2008 TO: THE APPLICANTS) AND/OR ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNER(S) RE: REZONING APPLICATION #05-08 FOR BPG PROPERTIES, LTD./I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER On behalf of the Frederick County Planning Commission, you are hereby notified of a public hearing being held on Wednesday, August 6, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia to consider the following application: Rezoning #05-08 of BPG Properties, Ltd./I-81 Distribution Center, submitted by BPG Properties, Ltd., to rezone 59 acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to B3 (Business, Industrial Transition) District, with proffers, for Office and Warehouse Uses. The properties are located approximately 0.61 miles north of the Route 11 intersection with Cedar Hill (Route 671), bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Martinsburg Pike (Route 11) in the Stonewall Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 33-A-109 and 33-A-110. A copy of the application will be available for review at the Handley Library and the Bowman Library the week of the meeting, or at the Department of Planning and Development located at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia, or by calling (540) 665-5651. You can also visit us on the web at: www.co.frederick.va.us. Sincerely, Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Planning Director MTR/bad 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 This is to certify hat t e attached correspondence was mailed to the following on V—() from the Department of Planning and Development, Frederick County, Virginia: BPG Properties, Ltd. C/o Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley, Emrich & Walsh PC 4310 Prince William Parkway, Ste. 300 Prince William, VA 22192 33 - A- - 109- BOYCE ROBIN LYNN & KAY MARIE PO BOX 67 CLEARBROOK VA. 22624-0067 33 -A- - 111- BRAGG DAVID LEE PO BOX 174 CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.0174 33 - A- - 112- FAIRFIELD FARM OF FREDERICK COLLC 2097 MARTINSBURG PIKE STEPHENSON VA 22656-1721 33 - A- - 108- CLINE DONALD S. 4123 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA. 22624.1535 STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF FREDEF 33 - A- - 87-B COOK DAVID C 4030 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1536 33 - A- - 87- RUSSELL GLEN E & JUDY S 2619 WOODSIDE RD CLEARBROOK VA. 22624-1355 33 - A- - 105-B MARTINSBURG PIKE ASSOCIATES LLC 4150 MARTINSBURG PIKE CLEARBROOK VA 22624.1534 Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Planning Di Frederick County Planning Departmerr 1Zi l/ a Notaiy Public in and for the State and County afoify that Michae . Ruddy, Deputy Planning Director for the Department of Plalopment,whose name is signed to the foregoing, dated has personally appeared before me and acknowledged the same in my Stasaid. Given under my hand this day of a��U My commission expires on 7N0TAWD#331878 E� GE" R"`�" NOTARY P LIC NOTARY COTH OFIVIRGINIA MY CXPIRES JULY 31, 2011 b -R- lo il�,f Adjoining Property Owners Rezoning 00:13ARBAPA-DATA PROCESSING FROM:BEV - Planning Dept. Please pri t sets of labels by THANKS! Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Property Identification Number Address Name Dm,id Jee P O Btc 174 CI aaltmkf VA 29624 Property # 33-A-111 Name Charles w an-&Ef Sr & ,7olirn 9lepard 2897 Mart nsimrg Pike CLem±rcok VA 22656 Property # 33-A-112 Named S. C'`l ir-e 4123 n:g Pike CLea�, VA 22624 Property # 33-A-108 Name yaY ML Balm P O B:c 67 CLeai±rmk VA 22624 Property # 33-A-86A Name yaY M. Baym P O Box 67 C1)a� VA 22624 Property # 33-A-868 Name DTAd C. Q� 4030 MartinslmLg Pike CLeaitrcck VA 22624 Property # 33 Ar- Name Glen E. & Judy S. F11 2619 WDoJsicb PcFd ClalrhLnck VA 22624 Property # 33-A-87 Name F�Ii rfi e] d Faun of F Ed_ Qb. LIC 2897 Mart i rsi„rg Pike Sher VA 22656 Property # 33-12-24 Name Martin-jbzg Pike Asssc., LLC 4150 Mart r � Pike C1eaAxoJVA 22624 Property # 33-A-105B 14 I Adjoining Property Owners Rezoning 40T O•BARBARA-DATA PROCESSING FROM:BEV - Planning Dept. Please pri t� sets of I els- �"a TNANKSi Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street. Name and Property Identification Number Address Name Druid Lee P O Bic 174 Property # 334-111 Name Charles W Cuff _c�r & Jc1ire gxTsr3 2397 Mardn§aR7g pike 0 VA 22656 , Property # 33-A-112 Name Lt�'ald S. CLine 4123 MarFi ndj trg pike Cldxcok, VA 22624 Property # 33-A-108 Name YiY M. Bayci2 P O Box 67 CLG�L , VA 22624 Property # 33-A-86A Name YaY m. g� P O Bic 67 VA 22624 Property # 33- 8 868 Name David C. ODC}t 4030 Nar� pike Clock VA 22624 Property # 33-A-9/B Name M-en E. & Juty S. >as9e11 2619 VboJs;cb lid Q tMck, VA 22624 Property # 33-N-87 Name Fairfield Finn C.f FYad_ Cb. TIC 2897 Muti.rdrg Pike S qJ asm, VA 22656 Property # 33-12-24 Name Martinsb-rg Pike Asscc., IIC 4150 MutirdDLrg piles Clear± k VA 22624 Property # 33-A-105B 14 JUb 2 0 2008 Document Approval Form PLEASE REVIEW THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT. IF THIS DOCUMENT MEETS YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE INITIAL AND PROVIDE THE DATE AND TIME OF YOUR APPROVAL. IF THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT MEET YOUR APPROVAL PLEASE PROVIDE COMMENTS AS TO WHAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO RAVE COMPLETED. INITIALS DATE & TIME Candice Angie Mark Dana Eric John Amber COMMENTS: Received by Clerical Staff (Date & Time): 2 d U:\Pam\Common\Document Approval Form.wpd