PC 04-05-23 Meeting Agenda1.Call to Order
2.Adoption of Agenda – Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission
should adopt the Agenda for the meeting.
3.Meeting Minutes
3.A.January 18, 2023 and February 15, 2023 Meeting Minutes
4.Committee Reports
5.Citizen Comments
6.Public Hearings
6.A.Double Church Agricultural & Forestal removal (Thomas Stelzl) - Mr.
Cheran
Submitted a request for Thomas Stelzl to remove a parcel totaling 100.35 +/- acres
from the Double Church Agricultural and Forestal District. The parcel is identified as
Property Identification Number 86-A-35 and is located in the Opequon Magisterial
District.
7.Action Items
7.A.Subdivision Waiver - One Logistics Park - Mr. Cheran
7.B.UDA Exception - Sandy's Mobile Home Park - Mr. Pearson
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, APRIL 5, 2023
7:00 PM
THE BOARD ROOM
FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
PCMinutes2023January18.pdf
PCMinutes2023February15.pdf
PC04-05-23ThomasStelzel_Removal_Redacted.pdf
PC04-05-23SubdivisionWavier01-23_One Logistic.pdf
PC04-05-23UDA_Exception_Sandy'sMobileHomePark.pdf
1
8.Other
8.A.Current Planning Applications
9.Adjourn
2
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 5, 2023
Agenda Section: Meeting Minutes
Title: January 18, 2023 and February 15, 2023 Meeting Minutes
Attachments:
PCMinutes2023January18.pdf
PCMinutes2023February15.pdf
3
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4000
Minutes of January 18, 2023
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on January 18, 2023.
PRESENT: John F. Jewell, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; Robert S.
Molden, Opequon District; William A. Orndoff, Stonewall District; Justin Kerns, Stonewall District; H.
Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; Elizabeth D. Kozel, Shawnee District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro
District; Betsy Brumback, Back Creek District; Mollie Brannon, Back Creek District; Charles Markert,
Red Bud District; Austin Cano, Assistant County Attorney.
ABSENT: Kathleen Dawson, Red Bud District; Jason Aikens, Gainesboro District.
STAFF PRESENT: John A. Bishop, Assistant Director; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision
Administrator; M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner; Shannon L. Conner, Administrative Assistant.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jewell called the January 18, 2023 meeting of the Frederick County Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Jewell commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join
in a moment of silence.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Orndoff
the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting.
-------------
4
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4001
Minutes of January 18, 2023
COMMITTEES
Frederick Water
Chairman Jewell shared the water report and rainfall totals for December 2022 and noted
the quarries remain in good condition.
City of Winchester – 01/17/23
Commissioner Pifer, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported the
Commission discussed a Conditional Use for SmartLink, LLC for a wireless telecommunications tower; a
Conditional Use for conversion of ground floor nonresidential use to multifamily use N. Cameron Street;
and an ordinance to vacate and convey a 14- feet long section of North Braddock Street.
-------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Jewell called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the
Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission.
Brenda Fristoe of the Stonewall Magisterial District came forward and addressed
comments previously made regarding her character. She shared her concerns with the NELUP and the
possibility of the quarry expansion.
Jacob Harrison of the Back Creek Magisterial District requested Rock Enon Road be
included on the to be paved list that the County shares with VDOT.
Mr. Bishop offered to speak with both individuals who spoke after the meeting tonight if
they would like to do so and he is willing to offer insight into their questions and concerns.
No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comments
portion of the meeting.
-------------
PUBLIC HEARING
Establishment of a New Agricultural and Forestal District – Long Creek Farm Agricultural &
Forestal District.
Action – Recommend Approval
Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator, reported this is a request to create
a new Agricultural and Forestal District “Long Creek Farm” that totals 1,077.39+/- acres. This is located
within the Back Creek Magisterial District and is ½ mile west of the intersection of Shady Elm Road
5
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4002
Minutes of January 18, 2023
(Route 651) and Springdale Road (Route 649). The proposed District would consist of fourteen (14)
parcels managed by one (1) property owner. Mr. Cheran shared a location map outlining the parcels.
Mr. Cheran continued, currently there are ten (10) Agricultural and Forestal Districts. He
shared the advantages of the program:
• Land Use Taxation
• Preserving land for open space
• Promotes agribusinesses and long-range agricultural planning
• Bonus density for the County’s Transfer of Development Rights Program
(1 density right + 2 dwelling units)
Mr. Cheran concluded, the Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) met on
December 16, 2022 and recommended approval of this new district. Staff is seeking a recommendation
from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors on the creation of the new Long
Creek Farm Agricultural and Forestal District.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Brumback and seconded by Commissioner
Brannon
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of the establishment of a New Agricultural and Forestal District – Long Creek Farm Agricultural &
Forestal District.
(Note: Commissioner Dawson and Commissioner Aikens were absent from the meeting.)
Establishment of a new Agricultural and Forestal District – North Frederick Agricultural &
Forestal District.
Action – Recommend Approval
Commissioner Brumback would abstain from all discussion on this item for a possible
conflict of interest.
Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator, reported this is a request to create
a new Agricultural and Forestal District “Norh Frederick” that totals 1,961.86 +/- acres. This is located
within the Gainesboro Magisterial District and is generally located 2.5 miles west of the intersection of
North Frederick Pike (Route 522) along North Sleepy Creek Road (Route 734) and Bloomery Pike (Route
127). The proposed District would consist of fifteen (15) parcels. Mr. Cheran shared a location map
outlining the property.
Mr. Cheran continued, currently there are ten (10) Agricultural and Forestal Districts. He
shared the advantages of the program:
6
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4003
Minutes of January 18, 2023
• Land Use Taxation
• Preserving land for open space
• Promotes agribusinesses and long-range agricultural planning
• Bonus density for the County’s Transfer of Development Rights Program
(1 density right + 2 dwelling units)
Mr. Cheran concluded, the Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) met on
December 16, 2022 and recommended approval of this new district. Staff is seeking a recommendation
from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors on the creation of the new North
Frederick Agricultural and Forestal District.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Triplett and seconded by Commissioner Thomas
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of the establishment of a New Agricultural and Forestal District – North Frederick Agricultural &
Forestal District.
(Note: Commissioner Dawson and Commissioner Aikens were absent from the meeting.)
Establishment of a new Agricultural and Forestal District – White Hall Agricultural & Forestal
District.
Action – Recommend Approval
Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator, reported this is a request to create
a new Agricultural and Forestal District “White Hall” that totals 974.30+/- acres. This is located within
the Gainesboro Magisterial District and is generally located along Wright Road (Route 661) and Apple
Pie Ridge Road (Route 739). The proposed District would consist of seven (7) parcels managed by one
(1) property owner. Mr. Cheran shared a location map of the property.
Mr. Cheran continued, currently there are ten (10) Agricultural and Forestal Districts. He
shared the advantages of the program:
• Land Use Taxation
• Preserving land for open space
• Promotes agribusinesses and long-range agricultural planning
• Bonus density for the County’s Transfer of Development Rights Program
(1 density right + 2 dwelling units)
Mr. Cheran concluded, the Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) met on
December 16, 2022 and recommended approval of this new district. Staff is seeking a recommendation
from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors on the creation of the new White
Hall Agricultural and Forestal District.
7
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4004
Minutes of January 18, 2023
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Triplett and seconded by Commissioner Thomas
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of the establishment of a New Agricultural and Forestal District – White Hall Agricultural & Forestal
District.
(Note: Commissioner Dawson and Commissioner Aikens were absent from the meeting.)
Addition to an Agricultural and Forestal District – South Timber Ridge Agricultural & Forestal
District.
Action – Recommend Approval
Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator, reported this is a request to add an
additional six (6) parcels with a total of 189.86+/- acres to the South Timber Ridge Agricultural and
Forestal District. The District is located within the Gainesboro Magisterial District and currently contains
seventeen (17) parcels with a total of 981.08+/- acres. The addition of six (6) parcels of 189.86+/- acres
will increase the total to 1,170+/- acres managed by one (1) property owner. It is generally located along
Hollow Road (Route 707) to the north, Muse Road (Route 610) and Gold Orchard Road (Route 708) to
the east. Mr. Cheran shared a location map of the property.
Mr. Cheran continued, currently there are ten (10) Agricultural and Forestal Districts. He
shared the advantages of the program:
• Land Use Taxation
• Preserving land for open space
• Promotes agribusinesses and long-range agricultural planning
• Bonus density for the County’s Transfer of Development Rights Program
(1 density right + 2 dwelling units)
Mr. Cheran concluded, the Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) met on
December 16, 2022 and recommended approval of this addition to the district. Staff is seeking a
recommendation from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors for the addition
to the South Timber Ridge Agricultural and Forestal District.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Triplett and seconded by Commissioner Kozel
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of the addition to the South Timber Ridge Agricultural & Forestal District.
(Note: Commissioner Dawson and Commissioner Aikens were absent from the meeting.)
8
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4005
Minutes of January 18, 2023
INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEM
Ordinance Amendment – OM Park District
M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported this is a proposal to amend the OM (Office-
Manufacturing) Park District to address stated concerns regarding the implementation of the zoning
district, to better implement County identified targeted industries and remove the link between OM and
MUIO designation in the Comprehensive Plan. The zoning ordinance text amendment originated from
discussions related to the update to the County’s Northeast Land Use Plan (NELUP) which contains
nodes of “mixed-use industrial office” (MUIO) planned land uses, which are intended to be implemented
with the OM district.
Current zoning ordinance standard:
• The intent of the OM Park District is to implement the MUIO land use
classification of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The OM Park District is
designed to provide areas for research-and-development centers, office parks,
and minimal-impact industrial and assembly uses. Uses are allowed which do
not create noise, smoke, dust or other hazards. This district shall be located in a
campus-like atmosphere near major transportation facilities.
• The current OM Zoning District has not been well utilized or implemented in
practice.
Proposed Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment:
• Staff and the DRRC propose the following revisions:
o Removing the “link” between OM district and MUIO district in the
Comprehensive Plan;
o Amending the district name to “Technology-Manufacturing Park District
(TM)”;
o Adding additional allowed uses, and
▪ Food and beverage manufacturing; specialized manufacturing;
flex-tech type uses
o Amending and removing required design standards
▪ Building design/materials; allowing for outdoor storage
Implementation:
• Creating greater allowances for warehousing uses accessory to primary uses; and
• Allowing for properties zoned TM to not submit a Master Development Plan
o Expediting time to market for potential development; and
o Allowing for a Board waiver to underground electrical requirements
Conclusion & Requested Action:
• The DRRC discussed this item on September 28, 2022, and November 21, 2022,
and recommended additional revisions which have been incorporated
• The primary discussion among DRRC members was the expansion of the
“allowed use” list
9
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4006
Minutes of January 18, 2023
• The DRRC did not achieve consensus on the proposed changes with some DRRC
members expressing comments on if the district should remain in the Zoning
Ordinance at all
• Staff is seeking comments from the Planning Commission to forward to the
Board of Supervisors
The Planning Commission was generally supportive of the proposed changes, noting that
the intent was to see implementation of the district in those areas of the County where new commercial
and industrial development is planned. The Planning Commission unanimously supported the item going
forward to the Board of Supervisors for additional discussion.
(Note: Commissioner Dawson and Commissioner Aikens were absent from the meeting.)
-------------
OTHER
A brief overview of Planning Applications was shared, and announcement was made that
a joint work session with the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors will be held on Friday,
February 3, 2023 at 8:00 a.m.
-------------
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner
Orndoff to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously
passed. The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
John F. Jewell, Chairman
___________________________
Wyatt G. Pearson, Secretary
10
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4007
Minutes of February 15, 2023
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on February 15, 2023.
PRESENT: John F. Jewell, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; Robert S.
Molden, Opequon District; William A. Orndoff, Stonewall District; Justin Kerns, Stonewall District; H.
Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Jason Aikens, Gainesboro
District; Betsy Brumback, Back Creek District; Mollie Brannon, Back Creek District; Charles Markert,
Red Bud District; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney.
ABSENT: Elizabeth D. Kozel, Shawnee District.
STAFF PRESENT: Wyatt G. Pearson, Director; M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner; Shannon L. Conner,
Administrative Assistant.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jewell called the February 15, 2023 meeting of the Frederick County Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Jewell commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join
in a moment of silence.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Aikens and seconded by Commissioner Thomas
the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Commissioner Manuel and seconded by Commissioner Thomas,
the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the December 7, 2022 meeting.
-------------
11
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4008
Minutes of February 15, 2023
COMMITTEES
Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee – Mtg. 02/13/23
Commissioner Aikens reported the Committee discussed the NELUP and it will be
coming back to the Planning Commission on March 1, 2023. He continued, the Sunnyside plan was
discussed and a letter will be coming out in the Spring. He concluded, the Committee endorsed the CIP
and it is being sent forward to the Planning Commission.
City of Winchester – 02/07/23
Commissioner Ray, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported at the work
session the Commission had two items: A presentation and review of the 2022 Community Development
Department annual report; and initial consideration of a resolution initiating an ordinance amending
multiple articles of the current zoning ordinance of Winchester pertaining to the addition o accessory
dwelling units and related clarifications. This work seeks to fulfill a resolution by Winchester Common
Council in June of 2022 seeking to develop a comprehensive approach to address housing availability and
affordability in the City.
Development Review & Regulations Committee – Mtg. 01/26/23
Commissioner Thomas reported, the Committee held the election of Chair (Kozel) and
Vice Chair (Thomas) for the 2023 calendar year. She continued, the Committee discussed revisions to the
sign ordinance; and discussed a waiver for overhead utilities in certain districts. The DRRC directed staff
to evaluate additional criteria for waiver eligibility and will come back to the DRRC at a later date.
Board of Supervisors
Supervisor Ludwig reported the Board revisited the issue with chickens in the various
districts and the Route 37 study was initiated.
-------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Jewell called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the
Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission. No one
came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comments portion of the meeting.
-------------
12
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4009
Minutes of February 15, 2023
PUBLIC HEARING
Rezoning #01-23 Car Credit Nation (1467, LLC) submitted to rezone approximately 1.345+/- acres
from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District to the B2 (General Business) Zoning District on a
property totaling 3.96+/- acres with proffers to allow for the expansion of an automotive dealership.
The property is located at 1467 Front Royal Pike, Winchester and is identified by Property
Identification Number (PIN) 76-A-4 in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
Action – Recommend Approval
M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported this is an application to rezone 1.345+/- acres
from RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (General Business) District on a property totaling 3.96+/- acres with
proffers to allow for the expansion of an automotive dealership in the Shawnee Magisterial District. He
shared a zoning map of the proposed property. Mr. Klein shared the conformance of the Comprehensive
Plan: The Plan identifies the subject property with an “urban-center” land use designation envisioning a
mix of uses “builds the identity and enhances the economic performance of these communities”; The
designation of “urban center’ is consistent with the existing and proposed B2 zonin g of the site; and the
proposed rezoning does not include the “mix of uses” envisioned, however, it may otherwise be
appropriate as an expansion to an existing business (automotive dealership). He displayed the Long Rage
Land Use map containing this property. Mr. Klein presented the proffer statement associated with REZ
#01-23 Car Credit Nation:
• Restrict uses to “automotive dealer” and “general business office” consistent with
existing business/use of the property.
• Contribution to Fire & Rescue Service.
• Full screen buffer to be provided.
Mr. Klein concluded, Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission
to forward to the Board of Supervisors for this proposed rezoning application.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time.
Dan and Jennifer Cress, of Front Royal Pike came forward and shared their concerns with
water run-off if additional paving should happen and they are concerned should the business change.
Douglas Kerns shared his concerns with the discharge that come through to his pond. He
noted, the applicant has been a good neighbor and they have assured him they will monitor this discharge.
No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comment
portion of the hearing.
Commissioner Aikens commented on the possibility of additional screening and buffers.
Commissioner Manuel, Commissioner Marker, and Commissioner Brannon spoke in favor of this
application. Commissioner Brumback inquired about the drain field and well and if it will be paved over.
Mr. Klein noted they both will be used by the Applicant and these items will be addressed at the site plan
stage; they have also proffered a full screen buffer. Commissioner Molden asked if the water and sewer
service would be expanded. Mr. Klein explained, the Applicant will be using their own drain field along
with well and septic. Commissioner Thomas commented he supports this application.
13
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4010
Minutes of February 15, 2023
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Manuel and seconded by Commissioner Thomas
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of Rezoning #01-23 Car Credit Nation (1467, LLC) submitted to rezone approximately 1.345+/- acres
from the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District to the B2 (General Business) Zoning Distric t on a property
totaling 3.96+/- acres with proffers to allow for the expansion of an automotive dealership. The property
is located at 1467 Front Royal Pike, Winchester and is identified by Property Identification Number
(PIN) 76-A-4 in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
(Note: Commissioner Kozel was absent from the meeting.)
Ordinance Amendment – OM Park District
Action – Recommend Approval
M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported this a proposal to amend the OM (Office-
Manufacturing) Park District to address stated concerns regarding the implementation of the zoning
district, to better implement County identified targeted industries and remove the link between OM and
Mixed-Use Industrial Office (MUIO) designation in the Comprehensive Plan. He continued, the zoning
ordinance text amendment originated from discussions related to the update to the County’s Northeast
Land Use Plan (NELUP) which contains nodes of MUIO planned land uses, which are intended to be
implemented with the OM district. Mr. Klein reviewed the current zoning ordinance standards:
• The intent of the OM District is to implement the mixed-use industrial/office land
use classification of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The OM Park District is
designed to provide areas for research-and-development center, office parks, and
minimal-impact industrial and assembly uses. Uses are allowed which do not
create noise, smoke, dust, or other hazards. This district shall be located in a
campus-like atmosphere near major transportation facilities.
• The current OM Zoning District has not been well utilized implemented in
practice.
Mr. Klein presented the proposed zoning ordinance text amendment: Removing the
stated “link” between OM District and MUIO in the Comprehensive Plan; Amending the district name to
“Technology-Manufacturing Park District (TM);” adding additional allowed uses, such as food and
beverage manufacturing, specialized manufacturing, flex-tech type uses and; Amending and removing
required design standards such as building design/materials and allowing for outdoor storage. Mr. Klein
shared the implementation of the amendment:
• Creating greater allowances for warehousing uses accessory to primary uses, and
• Properties rezoning to this district would not be required to submit a Master
Development Plan (MDP).
o Expediting time to market for potential development, and
o Allowing for a Board waiver to underground electrical requirement.
Mr. Klein concluded, the DRRC reviewed and endorsed this amendment on September
28, 2022 and November 21, 2022; and the EDA reviewed and endorsed this on February 2, 2023. Staff is
seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission to forward to the Board of Supervisors on this
proposed ordinance amendment.
14
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4011
Minutes of February 15, 2023
Commissioner Aikens thanked the DRRC for their efforts on this and he asked if the new
district aligns with the bio study by the EDA. Mr. Klein responded the EDA was involved with the
discussions early on.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time.
Mr. Stanley Crockett, the Vice-Chairman of the EDA came forward and presented a brief
overview of the intent of the EDA. He shared the vision and possibilities that can come of this.
No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comment
portion of the hearing.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Orndoff and seconded by Commissioner Kerns
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of Ordinance Amendment – OM Park District.
(Note: Commissioner Kozel absent from the meeting.)
Uncodified Ordinance – Frederick County Development Review Fee Schedule
Action – Recommend Approval
Wyatt G. Pearson, Director, shared the changes to the Development Review Fee
Schedule; he noted the DRRC discussed this item on January 26, 2023 and agreed it was necessary:
• Increase on the fee for postponement of advertised public meeting or public
hearing at the applicant’s request from $500 to $750
• Decrease in the Bond Replacement fee from $500 to $300
• Implementation of $200 fee for Short Term Lodging permits and renewals
Commissioner Brannon commented she has been contacted by several STL applicants
and feels it is a very tedious process. Mr. Pearson responded this is a work in progress and taking all
comments into consideration to make this process clearer.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Orndoff and seconded by Commissioner Thomas
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of Uncodified Ordinance – Frederick County Development Review Fee Schedule.
(Note: Commissioner Kozel absent from the meeting.)
-------------
15
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4012
Minutes of February 15, 2023
INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEM
Ordinance Amendment – Signs
M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported this is a proposal to amend the sign ordinance to
implement changes because of the Reed v. Town of Gilbert ruling (SCOTUS); specifically, the changes
proposed ensure content-neutral sign regulations. He noted, the majority of the sign standards already in
the ordinance (size, height, number, location) remain unchanged. Mr. Klein presented the following:
Current Zoning Ordinance Standards:
• This section is established to regulate the erection, number, area, height, location,
type, and maintenance of signs to promote the health, safety, and general welfare
of the public and the orderly development of the County by protecting property
values and providing adequate signage for businesses and motorists; protecting
and enhancing the image, appearance and economic vitality of the County, and
supporting the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan (§165-201.06).
Proposed Changes:
• Wall-mounted business signs shall be permitted one and one-half (1 ½) square
feet of sign area for each linear foot of building frontage or twenty-five (25)
square feet, whichever is greater, provided that the total area of any one -wall-
mounted business sign or signs does not exceed 200 square feet. In situations for
where there is more than one building user, such as in the diagram presented,
each user shall be permitted a sign area proportionate to their frontage using the
above calculation.
Mr. Klein concluded, the DRRC discussed this item on January 26, 2023 and supported
the proposed changes, therefore, Staff is seeking any comments from the Planning Commission to
forward to the Board of Supervisors on this ordinance amendment.
Commissioner Kerns asked if approved this would only apply to new signs. Mr. Klein
noted, that is correct, and any new signs would have to follow the ordinance.
This item is being forwarded to the Board of Supervisors with a favorable
recommendation from the Planning Commission.
2023-2028 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Wyatt G. Pearson, Director, reported this is to discuss the 2023-2028 Capital
Improvement Plan (CIP) which includes major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five -
year period, as well as a category for long term projects (6+ years out). He continued, the Code of
Virginia requires localities to adopt a CIP in order to accept proffers for capital improvements: Section
15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia – no public facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a “feature
shown” within a jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan; Projects are identified in the CIP are utilized in the
annual update to the County’s Capital Impacts Model if they qualify for inclusion. Mr. Pearson noted, the
Comprehensive Plan and the CIP are mutually supportive: The Comprehensive Plan identifies those
areas suitable for development, as well as the infrastructure it would need; and the CIP translates those
needs into capital projects designed to support the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
16
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4013
Minutes of February 15, 2023
Mr. Pearson explained, while the program serves as a long-range plan, it is reviewed and
revised annually based on current circumstances and opportunities. The adoption of the CIP is neither a
commitment to a particular project nor a limitation to a particular cost:
• Serves as a basic tool for identifying and ranking anticipated capital projects
• Strictly advisory and is not intended for requesting funding allocations
• Subject to change each year as the needs of the community become more defined
and projects move closer to implementation
• Projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP
Mr. Pearson shared the projects that are currently within the CIP for the General
government, Transportation, and the Airport:
• General government – 59 projects
o Schools – 6
o Parks – 18
o Library – 3
o Administration – 5
o Fire and Rescue – 5, and 18 volunteer
o Sheriff – 3
o Public Safety – 1
• Transportation – 28 projects
o Combination of local, state, federal funds, developer contributions, and
revenue sharing
• Airport – 9 projects
o Federal, state, and local government funding
Mr. Pearson concluded, the CPPC endorsed the 2023-2028 CIP on February 13, 2023 and
determined the CIP is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan. The CPPC forwarded the CIP to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. Staff is seeking a recommendation from the
Planning Commission for the CIP as well as affirmation that the 2023-2028 CIP is in conformance with
the Comprehensive Plan.
Commissioner Thomas commented he would like to see the CIP broken down into two
parts or two lists. He shared his concerns with school improvement costs and would like to see where the
cost drives are. Stacy Herbaugh, Director of Parks & Recreation, explained the need for the school
improvements in regards to a gym addition and other items that are used regularly by students throughout
the whole year. Mr. Pearson noted, he would pass along the comments and concerns from Commissioner
Thomas. Commissioner Thomas commented in regards to Parks and Rec, there is nothing on the plan for
older adults or things for people with less mobility and he would like to see this segment of the population
looked at. Ms. Herbaugh explained, the Aquatic Center has gone down on the list because of a private
group that is trying to establish this. She noted, the list is very fluid, and she will pass along the concerns.
The Planning Commission, with a favorable consensus will send this item forward to the
Board of Supervisors for their review.
----------
17
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 4014
Minutes of February 15, 2023
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner
Thomas to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Orndoff and unanimously
passed. The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
John F. Jewell, Chairman
___________________________
Wyatt G. Pearson, Secretary
18
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 5, 2023
Agenda Section: Public Hearings
Title: Double Church Agricultural & Forestal removal (Thomas Stelzl) - Mr. Cheran
Attachments:
PC04-05-23ThomasStelzel_Removal_Redacted.pdf
19
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
M E M O R A N D U M
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
Frederick County Planning Commission
Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator
Request to Remove Parcel 86-A-35, owned by Thomas Stelzl from the
Double Church Agricultural and Forestal District.
March 21, 2023
Please find attached a letter from Thomas Stelzl, (Fairview-Spring Hill Farms, Hog
Group, LLC.) dated February 22, 2023. Mr. Stelzl has requested the removal of one
parcel from the Double Church Agricultural and Forestal District. The Double Church
Agricultural and Forestal District was established in 1995 and has been renewed five
times. The most recent renewal of this district occurred in September 2020 for a period
of five years. Currently, 954.90 acres are contained in this district.
Mr. Stelzl desire to remove one parcel totaling 100.35+/- acres from the Double Church
Agricultural and Forestal District. Section 15.2-4314 of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, provides property owners with the ability to request removal of land from an
agricultural and forestal district through a public process via the local governing body.
This removal is to allow for a subdivision of the land.
The Agricultural District Advisory Committee (ADAC) considered this request during
their meeting of March 14, 2023. The ADAC unanimously recommended that this
100.35-acre parcel be removed from the Double Church Agricultural and Forestal
District. A total of 854.55-acres will remain in the Double Church Agricultural and
Forestal District.
Staff will present mapping during the Planning Commission meeting which delineates the
location of this acreage and its proximity to other land within the Double Church
Agricultural and Forestal District.
Following a public hearing, a recommendation from the Planning Commission to
forward to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate.
20
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 5, 2023
Agenda Section: Action Items
Title: Subdivision Waiver - One Logistics Park - Mr. Cheran
Attachments:
PC04-05-23SubdivisionWavier01-23_One Logistic.pdf
30
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator
RE: An appeal of the decision of the Subdivision Administrator in the administration
of the Frederick County Code Subdivision of Land Chapter 144 Section 25
DATE: March 15, 2023
_________________________________________________________________________________
This is a request by One Logistics Park, LP, represented by Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley & Walsh, P.C.,
for a waiver of the underground utilities requirement of County Code Section 144-25, for Parcel 64-
A-83, as a result of the decision of the Subdivision Administrator.
§144-5. INTERPRETATIONS AND APPEALS:
The Subdivision Administrator shall have the authority to make interpretations concerning the
application of the requirements of this chapter. Any person aggrieved by an interpretation made by the
Subdivision Administrator may appeal that interpretation to the Board of Supervisors, with a
recommendation from the Planning Commission. Variations in or exceptions to the provisions of this
chapter may be granted by the Board of Supervisors in cases of unusual situations or strict adherence
to the regulations would result in substantial injustice or hardship.
CODE 144 REQUEIREMENTS:
§144-25(A). Easements shall be recorded in subdivisions for all utility lines according to the
requirements of the relevant utility companies.
§144-25(B). Underground utilities. All electric, telephone and cable television lines shall be installed
underground. This requirement may be waived by the Board of Supervisors for subdivisions and lots
in business and industrial zoning districts not requiring an approved master development plan or
subdivisions in business and industrial zoning district that were approved prior to the adoption of this
chapter. Underground utilities shall be required in new industrial parks office parks and shopping
centers, as defined by Chapter 165, Zoning, of the Frederick County Code.
PROPERTY LOCATION AND ZONING: The Property (‘Property”) is identified with Property
Identification Number 64-A-83 within the Shawnee Magisterial District and is zoned M1(Light
Industrial) Zoning District.
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE:
North: RA (Rural Areas) District Use: Lumber Yard/Transmission Station
31
Appeal of Subdivision Administrator
March 15, 2023
Page 2
East: M1 (Light Industrial) District Use: Industrial
South: RA (Rural Areas) District Use: Airport
West: M1 (Light Industrial) District Use: Vacant
BACKGROUND: The above referenced Property is located within the project known as One
Logistics Park Winchester (“One Logistics”) and is subject to Rezoning #01-21, approved by Frederick
County with proffers and a proffered General Development Plan (GDP). The Property is zoned M1
(Light Industrial) Zoning District. One Logistics is subject to Master Development Plan #05-21
(MDP). The proffered GDP and approved MDP show the general lay out of the roads and land bays
for the development of this project.
The Property is to be served by Rappahannock Electric Cooperative (REC) to supply its electrical
needs. REC in working with the applicant does not have the electrical power availability along
Millwood Pike (Rt. 50) to serve this property. The applicant and REC have reviewed several
alternatives to service this Property at the applicant’s behest, and these alternatives have proved to be
costly. This alternative route for this electrical service would be along future Pendleton Drive. The
applicant is requesting the requirements of § 144-25 to be temporarily waived to allow for overhead
electric service until the Future Pendleton Drive is constructed and accepted by the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT). There is no date when the temporary electric service will be
terminated.
This Property has been rezoned four (4) times since 2005 to a more intensive zoning classification, the
most recent Rezoning #01-21 rezoned the balance of Property to M1. Presumably, due diligence as to
the availability of electrical service to this Property and the other land bays of this project would have
disclosed this issue. The other rezonings had approved proffer GDP’s and approved MDP’s, which
could have taken into consideration an alternative route to have underground utilities serve this
property and the other land bays.
Chapter §144-5 has a high threshold to be met variations in or exceptions to the provisions of this
chapter may be granted by the Board of Supervisors in cases of unusual situations or strict adherence
to the regulations would result in substantial injustice or hardship. In this case, the applicant had
numerous times throughout the land use action(s) process to evaluate the availability of underground
electric service to serve the property. The strict application of the Frederick County Code does not
produce an undue hardship as the hardship is self-inflicted by the applicant.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS: Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission to be
forwarded to the Board of Supervisors to affirm the decision of the Subdivision Administrator in the
administration of the Frederick County Code Chapter 144 Section 25.
MRC/pd
32
£¤50
511AIRPORT RD
300ADMIRALBYRD DR
190ADMIRALBYRD DR
190ADMIRALBYRD DR
730AIRPORT RD
155AVIATION DR221AVIATION DR
138TAILSPINCIR 730AIRPORT RD
220VICTORY RD
291INDEPENDENCE DR 285INDEPENDENCE DR285INDEPENDENCE DR 141SECURITY DR
222ADMIRALBYRD DR
200AVIATION DR
211VICTORY RD
120SECURITYDRIVE
580AIRPORT RD
600AIRPORT RD 382ARBOR CT 250INDEPENDENCE DR
212INDEPENDENCE DR
491AIRPORT RD
380ARBOR CT
328INDEPENDENCE DR
296VICTORY RD
220ADMIRALBYRD DR
338ARBOR CT
287VICTORY RD
287VICTORY RD 310VICTORY RD
368VICTORY RD344VICTORY RD
180ADMIRALBYRD DR
321ARBOR CT
331VICTORY RD
390AIRPORT RD 296ARBOR CT 351VICTORY RD
411VICTORY RD
181PENDLETON DR 266ARBOR CT
220ARBOR CT 441VICTORY RD
290AIRPORT RD113MUSKOKA CT 600PEGASUS CT
220ARBOR CT
182ARBOR CT311AIRPORT RD
295AIRPORT RD 402BUFFLICK RD 401PEGASUS CT
140ARBOR CT431BUFFLICK RD
330BUFFLICK RD
361BUFFLICK RD 391BUFFLICK RD399BUFFLICK RD
1830MILLWOODPIKE
301BUFFLICK RD
317BUFFLICK RD325BUFFLICK RD
1828MILLWOODPIKE 1825MILLWOOD PIKE
1815MILLWOODPIKE
1809MILLWOODPIKE
1080COVERSTONE DR
1813MILLWOOD PIKE
231SULPHURSPRING RD
112SULPHURSPRING RD
1753MILLWOODPIKE
1600MILLWOODPIKE
143SULPHUR SPRING RD
185SULPHURSPRING RD
201PRINCEFREDERICK
1544MILLWOOD PIKE
1170GREENWOOD RD
1525MILLWOODPIKE
1441MILLWOOD PIKE
1517MILLWOODPIKE
177RYCO LN
179RYCO LN
1230MILLWOODPIKE 1288MILLWOODPIKE1302MILLWOOD PIKE
100STANLEY DR1411MILLWOODPIKE 105DARBY DR
146POE DR145POE DR
147RYCO LN 151STANLEY DR 102WINSLOW CT
114EDGAR LN 125POE DR
115POE DR
120POE DR
157NEVERMORE DR
151NEVERMORE DR
103POE DR
1160MILLWOODPIKE 1186MILLWOOD PIKE 202CUSTERAVE 198STANLEY DR
105WINSLOW CT 102DUNER CT
114RAVENOAKS DR
129RAVEN OAKS DR
156DELCO PLAZA156DELCO PLAZA
1090MILLWOODPIKE 1237MILLWOODPIKE
103STANLEYCIR
125DARBY DR 124KILLANEY CT 131LENORE LN
1135MILLWOODPIKE1163MILLWOOD PIKE
106CLARENDON CT
107STANLEYCIR
133DARBY DR 112KILLANEY CT
104LENORE LN 117NEVERMORE DR
W IN S L O WCT
ETNAM ST
R E M E Y A V E
STANLEY CIR
PEMBRIDGEDRKILLANEY CT
TAILSPIN CIRFLANAGAN DRK
I
NR
OS
S
D
RSTANL
EY DRDARBYDRLE NOR E LN
POE DREDGAR LN RAVEN OAKS DRNEVERMORE DRSULPHURSPRING RD
AVIATIONDRINVERLEE WAYCUSTER AVE
RYCO LNPEGASUSCTBUFFLICK RDP
E
N
D
LET
O
N
D
R
AIRPORT RD
INDEPENDENCE DR
COSTELLO DR
VICTORY RDPRINCEFREDERICK DRARBOR CTMILLWOOD
PIKE
ADMIRAL BYRD DRCOVERSTONE DR
Application
Sewer and Water Service A rea
Parcels µ
Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: February 28, 2023
MILLWOOD PIKE
AIRPORT RDFRONT ROYAL PIKEBUFFLICK RD
VICTORY RDARBOR CTCOSTELLO DR
COVERSTONE DR POE DRINDEPENDENCE DRLILAC LNADMIRAL BYRD DR£¤50
0 1,000 2,000500 Feet
A p p e a l : O n e L o g i s t i c s P a r k , L PPIN: 6 4 -A -8 3Chapter 1 4 4 S e c t i o n 2 5 - W a iv e r o f U n d e r g r o u n d U t il i t ie sLocation M a p
64-A-83
33
34
35
36
37
38
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 5, 2023
Agenda Section: Action Items
Title: UDA Exception - Sandy's Mobile Home Park - Mr. Pearson
Attachments:
PC04-05-23UDA_Exception_Sandy'sMobileHomePark.pdf
39
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Wyatt Pearson, AICP, Planning & Development Director
SUBJECT: Request to Serve Residential Land Uses With Public Water & Sewer
Outside The Urban Development Area – 2044-2046 Fairfax Pike
DATE: March 24, 2023
Frederick County has received a request from Sandy’s MHC LLC to authorize Frederick
Water to serve Sandy’s Mobile Home Park at 2044 and 2046 Fairfax Pike (parcel 87-A-
95) with public sewer. The 2044 address is assigned to the mobile home units and 2046
assigned to the commercial market; the property is approximately 25 acres in size.
The subject property is zoned Mobile Home Community (MH1) and the Southern
Frederick Small Area Plan depicts these properties with a Mixed Use Industrial/Office
future land use designation, and as a part of the Lake Frederick Neighborhood Village.
Accordingly, future residential uses in the area are envisioned as an accessory component
of commercial land uses. The property is located within the County’s Sewer and Water
Service Area (SWSA) but not the Urban Development Area (UDA). County policies
require that residential land uses be located within both the SWSA and the UDA to
enable connections to Frederick Water services.
Sandy’s current waste treatment lagoon is under a consent order with Virginia
Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ). Should an exception not be granted for
the site, the applicant would need to consider substantial upgrades to the existing private
system. A future sanitary force main is planned by Frederick Water that could serve this
property if constructed. Water service has been provided historically to the property in
question and may predate Board policy.
The Applicant proposes to continue operation of the existing Mobile Home Community.
Absent any conditional approval by the Board of Supervisors, the existing zoning would
allow for additional mobile homes to be added to the property if desired by the applicant.
Since this exception is not seeking to expand the boundary of the UDA, this request could
be decided by the Board of Supervisors without a public hearing or amendment to the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission
on this requested exception.
40
UDA Exception Request
Sandy’s MHC LLC
March 24, 2022
Page 2
Please contact Staff should you have any questions regarding this request.
Attachments:
Location Map
Comments from Frederick Water
41
76 A 65HORTONINVESTMENTS LLC
£¤522
¬«277
¬«277
¬«277
¬«277¬«277
¬«277
BAYHILLTERFARROWDRBERGAMOT WAYCHANNELCAT WAY
FIREWEEDDR
COLUMBINE DR
TEALCT
EM O R YCT
PERIWINKLE PL
F LY CA T CH E R W A YPOPPYDR HERONCTNANDINAPLREA MSS TAT ION CT CARTERSCIRCONEFLOWER WAYSMOKEBUSHWAYPINTAILWAY
PERRYVILLECT
TWINLEAFWAYM E LLO WCT BURKWOODTER
BULLRUN CT
B
R
AN
TCT TERRYSLNFISHERSHILL CT
SWITCHGRASSWAY
OATGRASSCTREEDVILLECT
IRONWEEDDRPEREGRINECT
PIPITCT
PIMPERNELPL
B
L
U
E
R
I
DGE L
NDOUBLETOLLGATERDDEEPBOTTOM PLFRIESLOOPRDSTO RAG ESO LUTIO NSLNSITLINGTONSHILL CT
BALLSBLUFFWAY
CABBAGEWHITE DRWALLEYECT
STONECROPCT
WITHERODCT
MILKWEEDDRPHOEBECT FRINGETREECTVICEROYWAYBUTTERCUPDRBLUETSDRCHANCELLORSVILLEDRBOYDTONPLANK DRFORGET MENOT DRPARISCTCHOKECHERRY CTFOAMFLOWER DR
L
AR
U
E
L
NBARREDOWL WAYRADFORD CTGROSBEAKCTBLEEDINGHEART DRRAINVILLERDT
OWHEEDRCEDARMOUNTAIN DRSASSER LNMARCELDRFIRSTMANASSAS PLWARRIORDRLEATHERFLOWER DREMPERORDRUPPERVILLEDR
NUTHATCHDR
COOLSPRING DR
TRUMPET VINE DRBREEZYACRES LNGADWELL LNFREDERIC KSBURG
DRSKIPPERDR KATHLEEN CTSONGSPARROW DR
LADYSMITHDR
G E M S TO N E
D RBLACKBURNSFORD DRBRIDGEPORT LNFORESTLAKE DRCOWBIRD STHOMEPLACECT
JOU R N EY MA N LN
MALLARDDRARMEL
RDTADPOLELNCEDAR LN
REARDON RD
R
ACH
E
LCAR
S
ON
D
R
BRIDGEWATER DR
APPRENTICE LNSTONEWALLJACKSONHWYMARANTO
MANOR DR
RIDINGS LNTASKER RD
FRONT ROYALPIKERITTER RDW RIGHTS RUN LNWHITE OAK RDFAIRFA
X PIKE
HUDSON
HOLLOW RD
UDA
Application
Sewer and Water Service A rea
Parcels µ
Frederick C ounty Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, V A 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: March 22, 2023
FAIRFAX PIKE
FRONT ROYAL PIKERIDINGS LNWRIGHTS RUN LN¬«277
0 2,100 4,2001,050 Feet
CLARKECOUNTY
UDA ExceptionPIN: 87-A-95Sandy's MHC LLCLocation Map
87-A-95
42
From:Eric R. Lawrence
To:Wyatt Pearson
Subject:"[External]"Sandy"s Mobile Home Park SWSA Exception Request
Date:Tuesday, March 7, 2023 3:39:42 PM
Mr. Pearson,
Thank you for your e-mail of March 3, 2023 requesting comment from Frederick Water on Sandy’s
Mobile Home Park’s request for an exception to utilize Frederick Water’s sanitary sewer services. I
offer the following for your consideration as you process the request and ultimately secure a
decision from the Board of Supervisors.
Sandy’s Mobile Home Park is located at 2044 and 2046 Fairfax Pike, and is identified by Property
Identification Number 87-A-95. The 2044 address is assigned to the mobile home units and 2046
assigned to the commercial market. The property is located within the County’s Sewer and Water
Service Area (SWSA) but not the Urban Development Area (UDA). County policies require that
residential land uses be located within both the SWSA and the UDA to enable connections to
Frederick Water services.
The property has had public water service for many years, dating back to the 1990s when Frederick
Water installed a 12-inch water main along Fairfax Pike to serve the Virginia Department of
Corrections’ Camp 7 Detention Center in White Post on Route 522S.
Sanitary sewer service could be available to Sandy’s MHP within the next three years. Frederick
Water is working on a sanitary sewer forcemain initiative to improve sanitary sewer service for the
Lake Frederick community, and the nearby areas of Frederick and Clarke Counties. More specifically,
sanitary sewer service would be more accessible in Frederick County’s triangle area bounded by
Fairfax Pike (Route 277), Front Royal Pike (Route 522), Tasker Road (Route 642), and White Oak Road
(Route 636); and Clarke County’s Double Tollgate area. Sandy’s MHP is well positioned to benefit if
it could connect to Frederick Water’s sanitary sewer improvement.
Frederick Water is prepared to work with the owners of Sandy’s MHP and establish a connection to
Frederick Water’s sanitary sewer if approval is granted by the Board of Supervisors.
Please advise if additional information from Frederick Water is necessary for the Board of
Supervisors consideration of the property owner’s request.
Thank you.
Eric
43
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: April 5, 2023
Agenda Section: Other
Title: Current Planning Applications
Attachments:
44