PC 02-16-22 Meeting Agenda1.Call to Order
2.Adoption of Agenda – Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission
should adopt the Agenda for the meeting.
3.Meeting Minutes
3.A.January 5, 2022 Meeting Minutes
3.B.January 19, 2022 Meeting Minutes
4.Committee Reports
5.Citizen Comments
6.Information/Discussion Items
6.A.2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - (Mrs. Perkins)
The CIP is a prioritized list of capital project requested by various County Department
and Agencies. The Plan is created as an information document to assist in the
development of the County’s annual budget. If adopted, the CIP is a component of the
Comprehensive Plan.
7.Other
7.A.Current Planning Applications
8.Adjourn
AGENDA
PLANNING COMMISSION
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2022
7:00 PM
THE BOARD ROOM
FREDERICK COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
PC02-16-22MinutesJanuary5.pdf
PC02-16-22MinutesJanuary19.pdf
PC02-16-22Draft2022-2027CIP.pdf
1
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: February 16, 2022
Agenda Section: Meeting Minutes
Title: January 5, 2022 Meeting Minutes
Attachments:
PC02-16-22MinutesJanuary5.pdf
2
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3882
Minutes of January 5, 2022
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on January 5, 2022.
PRESENT: Kevin Kenney, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; John F.
Jewell, Member-At-Large; Gary R. Oates, Stonewall District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District;
Elizabeth D. Kozel, Shawnee District; Betsy Brumback, Back Creek District; Mollie Brannon, Back
Creek District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Kathleen Dawson, Red Bud District; Roderick B.
Williams, County Attorney.
ABSENT: Robert S. Molden, Opequon District; William A. Orndoff, Stonewall District.
STAFF PRESENT: Wyatt G. Pearson, Director; M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner; Shannon L. Conner,
Administrative Assistant.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Kenney called the January 5, 2022 meeting of the Frederick County Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Kenney commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join
in a moment of silence.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Oates the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Manuel, the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the December 1, 2021 meeting.
-------------
3
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3883
Minutes of January 5, 2022
ELECTION OF OFFICERS, MEETING SCHEDULE, AND ADOPTION OF BYLAWS AND
RULES & RESPONSIBILITIES FOR 2022
Director, Wyatt G. Pearson, presided over the election of the Chairman and Vice-
Chairman for 2022.
Election of John F. Jewell, Chairman for 2022
Director, Wyatt G. Pearson, declared nominations open for Chairman for the 2022
calendar year.
The nomination of Mr. John F. Jewell for Chairman was made by Commissioner Oates
and seconded by Commissioner Thomas.
BE IT RESOLVED, that by a unanimous vote, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
elect Mr. John F. Jewell as Chairman of the Planning Commission for the calendar year 2022.
Election of Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman for 2022
Director, Wyatt G. Pearson, declared nominations open for Vice Chairman for the 2022
calendar year.
The nomination of Mr. Roger L. Thomas for Vice Chairman was made by Commissioner
Triplett and seconded by Commissioner Oates.
BE IT RESOLVED, that by a unanimous vote, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
elect Mr. Roger L. Thomas as Vice Chairman of the Planning Commission for the calendar year 2022.
Election of Wyatt G. Pearson, Secretary for 2022
Chairman Jewell declared nominations open for Secretary for the 2022 calendar year.
The nomination of Mr. Wyatt G. Pearson was made by Commissioner Oates and
seconded by Commissioner Thomas.
BE IT RESOLVED, that by a unanimous vote, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
elect Mr. Wyatt G. Pearson as Secretary of the Planning Commission for the calendar year 2022.
PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS AND ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES AND MEETING
SCHEDULES FOR 2022
Chairman Jewell stated the Planning Commission’s Bylaws and Roles and
Responsibilities and Meeting Schedules have been reviewed by the Commission and are ready for the
Commission’s consideration and adoption.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Manuel
4
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3884
Minutes of January 5, 2022
BE IT RESOLVED that the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously adopt the
Planning Commission’s Bylaws and the Roles & Responsibilities and Meeting Schedules for the calendar
year of 2022 as presented.
COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS
Chairman Jewell reported all Committee assignments will remain the same at this time.
-------------
COMMITTEES
City of Winchester – Mtg. 12/21/21
Commissioner Pifer, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported the
Commission recommending approval of an Ordinance to Rezone 4.3 acres of land at 229 south Pleasant
Valley Road from Residential Office District with Corridor Enhancement Overlay to Medium Density
Residential District with Corridor Enhancement Overlay and Planned Unit Development Overlay.
Transportation Committee – Mtg. 12/27/21
Commissioner Oates reported the Committee reviewed roads for the CIP which were
discussed and approved to move forward.
NELUP Committee
Commissioner Oates reported the Committee held three meetings in December at which
time they reviewed roads, power availability (Shenandoah Electric), the gas company came and gave
some good information, the EDQ discussed items. He reviewed the purpose of the NELUP to the new
members of the Planning Commission and noted they typically meet on Thursday morning.
-------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Jewell called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the
Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission.
Mr. Bob Clarke of the Opequon District came forward representing the Exit 302 Smart
Development Coalition group and gave a brief overview of what the group does. He was speaking in
regards to the 20 acres in Middletown, Virginia being proposed for Sheetz Corporation; this property is
historically significant to Frederick County. He has viewed the preliminary concept plan, and this is
massive and does not fit off Exit 302. The Coalition is going to address this the best they can to help
protect and preserve the land and would like to see some balance. He concluded he would like to see the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors support this group in finding a better solution.
No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comments
portion of the meeting.
5
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3885
Minutes of January 5, 2022
PUBLIC HEARING
Ordinance Amendment – Steep Slopes, Farm Wineries/Breweries/Distilleries, Inoperable Motor
Vehicles, Pedestrian Access, and Street Design.
Action – Recommend Approval
M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported this is a proposal to revise Chapter 144 –
Subdivision of Land and Chapter 165 – Zoning Ordinance to clarify, amend and remove requirements
contained in the following sections: general provisions, supplementary use regulations, regulations for
specific uses, and design standards.
Steep Slopes (§144-2 & §165-101.02)
• Proposed revision to amend the definition for “steep slopes” from 15%
and 50% respectively to 35%.
• Both chapters apply to many land applications such as subdivisions, site
plans, and the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program and
therefore application of a consistent standard is needed.
Farm Wineries, Farm Breweries, and Farm Distilleries (§165-204.22)
• Proposed revision to remove provisions for festival permits.
• The Board of Supervisors removed Chapter 86 – Festival Permits from
the Code of Frederick County in the spring of 2021.
• This amendment would eliminate the festival permit requirement and
removes the limitation of 100 persons permitted at events held on farm
wineries, breweries, and distilleries.
Inoperable Motor Vehicles (§165-101.02 & §165-204.11)
• Proposed revision to prohibit the unscreened storage of inoperable
trailers (trailer, camping trailer, or semitrailer).
• Currently, the Zoning Ordinance prohibits the unscreened outdoor
storage of inoperable motor vehicles; however, the current definition
does not in include provisions for the regulation of trailers.
• This amendment is seeking to regulate trailers in the same manner as
inoperable motor vehicles. It would not affect “farm use” tagged
vehicles/trailers.
Pedestrian Access (§165-203.03)
• Proposed revision to amend the section for pedestrian walkways/trails to
ensure pedestrian accommodations are provided to implement
Comprehensive Plan policies.
• The Zoning Ordinance currently requires sidewalks only when they are
planned as included in a “corridor or walkway plan.”
Street Design (§144-17)
• Proposed revision to modify the requirements for minimum right-of-way
for each street classification (local street, minor collector, major
collector, and arterial roadways), to ensure the design of the roadway
fulfills future roadway classification as specified in the Comprehensive
6
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3886
Minutes of January 5, 2022
Plan, and meets all current criteria as required by the Virginia
Department of Transportation (VDOT).
• Presently, only minimum right-of-way is required which may be
insufficient for planned future conditions contained in the
Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Klein concluded, the Board of Supervisors discussed these amendments at their
December 8, 2021 meeting and forwarded them to public hearing.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Commissioner Dawson asked if this would require every subdivision to have sidewalks.
Mr. Klein explained, that is the current standard applied to subdivisions and this is pertaining to the
zoning ordinance and in most cases, it will be for business and industrial districts but ensuring we have
sidewalks on all properties that are being developed where the planned road condition calls for sidewalks.
Commissioner Dawson asked what about affordable housing developments; when curb, gutter, and
sidewalks are involved it will really push the price up. Mr. Klein stated, presently the zoning ordinance
does not have a specific exception for affordable housing.
Commissioner Thomas commented, in the subdivision ordinance there are no references
to private roads or streets that would refer to steep slopes; because if we are changing the steep slope in
the subdivision ordinance from 15% to 35% and if that is used to determine the type of surfacing for a
private road, he feels the 35% would be a little too much. Mr. Klein noted it does not pertain to private
roads and driveways; it is about how much land area where a steep slope as defined by the ordinance can
be disturbed. Commissioner Thomas asked if the term steep slope was used anywhere pertaining to
private roads or driveways. Mr. Klein stated not that he is aware of; the ordinance allows for a percentage
of steep slopes and other environmental features to be disturbed, so by amending the threshold for that it
may increase the number of steep slopes on the property or it may decrease the amount. Commissioner
Oates commented the only regulations for private driveways and for entrance spacing is per VDOT and
once it leaves the right-of-way the County has no way to how a person builds their driveway.
Commissioner Brannon asked if the Board of Supervisors approval is being removed
regarding the pedestrian access part of the ordinance. Mr. Klein explained removing that requirement is
because we no longer require MDP’s to go before the Planning Commission and the Board of
Supervisors; so, when reviewing those the Board of Supervisors does not have an opportunity to ask for
anything additional and this is just a clean up item. Commissioner Brannon asked in regards to street
design should the wording be changed to read it has to be to VDOT standards. Mr. Klein commented,
VDOT does not have a consistent standard for all the road classifications, and it depends on a number of
criteria; the numbers provided are standard that VDOT intends to continue to apply. Commissioner
Brannon stated she is concerned with the change to steep slopes. Mr. Klein explained, it is what
percentage of that feature steep slopes as defined can be disturbed; by going from 50% to 35% you may
increase the number of steep slopes on a property you are trying to implement a consistent standard.
Commissioner Brannon asked why not go to 50% standard, so you are not taking a person lot.
Commissioner Oates commented, there is not a lot of area in the County that will go much over 35% and
that is about s steep as you want to go before it starts washing away; not may areas that reach 50% in the
County, so it is not going to affect business areas. Commissioner Brannon commented regarding the
inoperable trailers; it stated they have to be tagged and inspected. If someone has a large property and
wants to run a trailer across it do, they need to tag and inspect. Mr. Klein explained, it would have to be
screened from view when being parked on the property if not being used for road hauling under the
7
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3887
Minutes of January 5, 2022
screening requirement of the Zoning Ordinance. Commissioner Brannon asked why it would have to be
tagged and inspected. Mr. Klein stated if complaints are received and by specifying in the Zoning
Ordinance this allows for enforcement. Commissioner Brannon commented she understands not wanting
all the junk around on a property, but she does not understand if it is operable and solely remains on the
property why it would have to be tagged and inspected. Mr. Wyatt Pearson, Director, explained it is
worth noting that currently an inoperable vehicle applies to an automobile that is not tagged or inspected
even if not going on the road and we are looking to establish a definable standard so when our inspector is
out there, they are not utilizing their own judgement for something they cannot pull out on the road to see
if it is operable or not; having the tags and inspection on it is an easy means to determine whether or not it
is operable that is defined by the State criteria. This in turns helps us enforce an ordinance in order to
avoid junky situations.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Kozel
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does recommend approval of Ordinance
Amendment – Steep Slopes, Farm Wineries/Breweries/Distilleries, Inoperable Motor Vehicles, Pedestrian
Access, and Street Design.
Yes: Oates, Kozel, Manuel, Brumback, Dawson, Triplett, Thomas, Jewell
No: Brannon
(Note: Commissioner Orndoff and Commissioner Molden were absent from the meeting.)
-------------
OTHER
Wyatt G. Pearson, Director of Planning shared the Opequon Crossing rezoning (old
Haggerty Property) is coming back to life and will be brought forth accordingly. He noted, the Board of
Supervisors is having a work session on January 12, 2022 and all are invited to attend.
Chairman Jewell thanked Kevin Kenney for all of his hard work and guidance over the
years. Commissioner Oates thanked the Planning Department Staff for offering to educate the Board of
Supervisors on various planning topics and he also thanked Kevin Kenney for his countless hours of
service, and he will be missed.
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner
Thomas to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Oates and unanimously
passed. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
John F. Jewell, Chairman
___________________________
Wyatt G. Pearson, Secretary
8
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: February 16, 2022
Agenda Section: Meeting Minutes
Title: January 19, 2022 Meeting Minutes
Attachments:
PC02-16-22MinutesJanuary19.pdf
9
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3888
Minutes of January 19, 2022
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on January 19, 2022.
PRESENT: John F. Jewell, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; Robert S.
Molden, Opequon District; Gary R. Oates, Stonewall District; William A. Orndoff, Stonewall District; H.
Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; Mollie Brannon, Back Creek District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro
District; Kathleen Dawson, Red Bud District; Austin Cano, Assistant County Attorney.
ABSENT: Elizabeth D. Kozel, Shawnee District; Betsy Brumback, Back Creek District.
STAFF PRESENT: Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director; Shannon L. Conner, Administrative
Assistant.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Jewell called the January 19, 2022 meeting of the Frederick County Planning
Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Kenney commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join
in a moment of silence.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon motion made by Commissioner Triplett and seconded by Commissioner Thomas
the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Oates, the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the December 15, 2021 meeting.
-------------
10
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3889
Minutes of January 19, 2022
COMMITTEES
City of Winchester – Mtg. 01/18/22
Commissioner Pifer, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported the
Commission recommended approval of an ordinance to rezone 2.82 acres from Medium Density
Residential District to Medium Density Residential District with Planned Unit Development Overlay and
an ordinance to rezone 36 parcels containing approximately 10.6 acres from Commercial Industrial
District and Limited High Density Residential District to Central Business District. They also discussed a
resolution to initiate a text amendment to the code that defines solar energy systems.
NELUP Committee
Commissioner Oates reported the Committee worked their way from Fort Collier to Old
Charlestown Road. At the next meeting they plan to review the area from Old Charlestown Road to
Brucetown Road.
-------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Jewell called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the
Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission.
Mr. Bob Clarke of the Opequon District came forward representing the Exit 302 Smart
Development Coalition group and once again shared the concerns of the planned Sheetz Corporation
building in Middletown. He presented some history of the property and stated they would ideally like to
sit down with the Sheetz Corporation and see if they can reach an agreement that will benefit both parties.
No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public comments
portion of the meeting.
-------------
PUBLIC HEARING
Conditional Use Permit #14-21 for Terrence Price submitted to construct a 60’ tall wireless
telecommunication tower. The property is located at 1104 Rockwood Trail, Winchester, Virginia
and is identified with Property Identification Number (PIN) 49B03-123-251 in the Back Creek
Magisterial District.
Action – Recommend Approval
Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director, reported this request for a CUP is to allow for the
construction of a 60-foot wireless telecommunication tower for personal use at 1104 Rockwood Trail, in
the Back Creek Magisterial District. The subject property is zoned R5 (Residential Recreational
Community) District and is within the Shawneeland subdivision. She continued, the proposed 60-foot
11
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3890
Minutes of January 19, 2022
commercial telecommunication facility is located on a 1.9+/- acre property. The Zoning Ordinance
allows for commercial telecommunication facilities in the R5 Zoning District with an approved CUP.
Ms. Perkins explained, the Comprehensive Plan provides guidance when considering any
land use action. The Comprehensive Plan identifies this area of the County to remain residential in nature
which is consistent with the current zoning and use of the site; the properties adjacent to this proposed
tower are vacant and zoned R5 District. Ms. Perkins presented the Conditions of Approval as
recommended by Staff:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all
times.
2. The tower shall be available for collocating of personal wireless services
providers.
3. The tower shall be removed by the Applicant or Property Owner within twelve
(12) months of abandonment of operation.
4. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use
Permit.
Commissioner Oates asked if the tower was attached to a building would they need a
CUP. Ms. Perkins stated, in order to have administrative approval that would be the case up to 50-feet
however this is 60-feet from the ground, so it needs a CUP.
Chairman Jewell called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to
come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Jewell closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Commissioner Brannon stated she spoke with Mr. Price, and he has no intention to make
this tower available to the public. Commissioner Thomas inquired, does the Applicant understand
Condition #2 and if someone wants to collocate on the tower it would have to be allowed. Mr. Price, the
Applicant came forward and stated it was his understanding if someone was going to collocate it would
require a new CUP. Ms. Perkins explained, if someone else in the vicinity wanted wireless service the
optional thing would be to collocate on an existing tower if at all possible and work with the property
owner and the County. Mr. Price commented he is concerned as the property owner that he would be
liable for what happens on the property if collocation is allowed.
Commissioner Thomas inquired if he would have to get an indemnification from the
person wanting to collocate that would indemnify him from any liability or is the County responsible
since we are requiring him to allow others to collocate on the tower. Austin Cano, Assistant County
Attorney commented he believes that is correct and would like to do more research before giving a
definitive answer. Commissioner Manuel commented there would have to be a legal document between
the property owner and those wishing to collocate. Commissioner Oates stated he feels Condition #2
should be removed and Commissioner Thomas agreed. Ms. Perkins commented Condition #2 can be
removed by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Dawson inquired what if the property owner does
want to have someone collocate after this is removed. Mr. Price stated he does not want that.
Upon a motion made by Commissioner Brannon and seconded by Commissioner Dawson
with the removal of Condition #2
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does unanimously recommend approval
of Conditional Use Permit #14-21 for Terrence Price submitted to construct a 60’ tall wireless
telecommunication tower. The property is located at 1104 Rockwood Trail, Winchester, Virginia and is
12
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3891
Minutes of January 19, 2022
identified with Property Identification Number (PIN) 49B03-123-251 in the Back Creek Magisterial
District.
(Note: Commissioner Brumback and Commissioner Kozel were absent from the meeting.)
-------------
Cancelation of Regular Meeting
Chairman Jewell announced there were no pending items for the Planning Commission’s
February 2, 2022 meeting and it will be canceled.
-------------
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner
Triplett to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Manuel and unanimously
passed. The meeting adjourned at 7:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
John F. Jewell, Chairman
___________________________
Wyatt G. Pearson, Secretary
13
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: February 16, 2022
Agenda Section: Information/Discussion Items
Title: 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) - (Mrs. Perkins)
Attachments:
PC02-16-22Draft2022-2027CIP.pdf
14
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director
DATE: February 9, 2022
RE: Discussion: 2022-2027 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is a document that consists of a schedule of major
capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five-year period, as well as a category
for long term projects (6 + years out). The CIP is intended to assist the Board of
Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for
capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP
conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with
considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component
of the Comprehensive Plan.
The inclusion of projects on the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will
be undertaking these projects. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as capital
facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted,
project priorities and cost estimates may change throughout the year based on chan ging
circumstances. It is also possible that projects may not be funded during the year
indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further
out the project date is identified. The CIP is also updated annually, and projects are
removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change.
CIP Components
The CIP provides project priorities that are submitted by various County Agencies and
tables that outline the projects and cost estimates. Within the tables, columns for each
year show the funding needs that would be requested in the corresponding budget cycle.
In addition, those projects that are long range projects have been placed at the end of the
CIP table, outside of the five-year window. The CIP includes three separate tables; the
first table shows County funded projects and the second and third tables cover
Transportation projects and Airport projects which are primarily funded through other
sources.
15
2022-2027 CIP – Discussion
February 9, 2022
Page 2
The CIP includes projects from the following: Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional
Library, County Administration, Fire and Rescue, Sheriff’s Office, Public Safety
Communications, Transportation and the Winchester Regional Airport.
Background – Discussions
The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) will discuss the 2022-2027
CIP capital improvement project requests at their meeting on February 14, 2022. The role
of the CPPC in the CIP process is to ensure that the various departmental project requests
are in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
Conclusion
Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the Board of
Supervisors regarding the 2022-2027 CIP. It is also the role of the Planning Commission
to affirm that the 2022-2027 CIP is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan.
If adopted, the CIP will become a component of the Comprehensive Plan, which would
satisfy the review requirement of Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia, which states
that no public facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a “feature shown” within
a jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan.
Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this
information.
CEP/pd
Attachment - Draft 2022-2027 CIP with applicable text, tables, and maps
16
Adopted by the
Frederick County
Board of Supervisors
TBD
Recommended by the
Frederick County
Planning Commission
TBD
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
2022-2027
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
17
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION……………………………...……………………………….. 1
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS……………..………..……………….2-4
Frederick County Public Schools…………………….……... 2
Frederick County Parks and Recreation ..………………. 2
Handley Regional Library .………………….………….……….2
County Administration .……………………………..…………..2
Fire & Rescue………...……………………………….………………3
Sheriff’s Office………………………………………………………. 3
Public Safety Communications………………………………..3
Transportation Committee……………………………………. 4
Winchester Regional Airport………………………….……….4
CAPITAL PROJECTS MAPS
Capital Projects……………………………………………..…….….5
Frederick County Public Schools….…….…………….……..6
Parks and Recreation ………………..…………………..…….…7
Transportation Projects………………..…………………….....8
CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS………………………….…….………….………9
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLES …………….….10-13
APPENDIX - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Frederick County Public Schools…………………………….. 15
Frederick County Parks and Recreation ………….…….…18
Handley Regional Library……………………………………….. 25
County Administration…………………….……………….………27
Fire and Rescue……………..……………………………….….…….30
Volunteer Fire Company Requests …………………….…….32
Sheriff’s Office ……….……..………………………….…………….40
Public Safety Communications………………………….……..41
Transportation Committee ………………………………………50
Winchester Regional Airport……………….………..….…… 47
18
1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
FREDERICK COUNTY
FY 2022-2027
INTRODUCTION
Section §15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning
Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the County for the
ensuing five years.
The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is
intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital
expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically,
the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan. Once the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan and provides a link between the
documents and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning projects.
The inclusion of projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. The CIP is
strictly advisory; it is intended for use, as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once
adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that projects may
not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in
the future it is projected.
19
2
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
Frederick County Public Schools
Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects that have been priorities from previous years.
The top capital improvement priority for the schools is the Armel Elementary School renovation and expansion. The renovation of
the old Aylor Middle School facility into an academy is the second priority, followed by the Sherando High School renovations and
addition.
Parks & Recreation
The top capital improvement priority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams Creek Greenway Trail. This facility would provide
recreational opportunities for residents of this corridor along with the surrounding communities and was emphasized in the
Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan. Other top priorities include the Indoor Aquatic Center, Old Charlestown Road Park
development.
Handley Regional Library
The Handley Regional Library recommends three projects. The library’s top priority is a new library branch in the Gainesboro area.
The second and third priorities are for new library branches throughout the County which include the areas of Senseny/Greenwood
Road and Route 522 South; both of which are anticipated to be located within the UDA (Urban Development Area) in locations
consistent with the approved area plans - the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the Southern Frederick Area Plan.
County Administration
There is one request from Public Works–the Double Toll Gate Convivence Site.
County Administration projects continue to be the County Office Annex (Former Sunnyside Plaza Shopping Center), the joint County
Administration and School Administration Building and the future replacement of the Joint Judicial Center. General Government
Capital Expenditures is also included in the CIP – this item enhances the connection between the CIP and proffered contributions
made to mitigate the impacts of development projects. This item addresses those general government capital expenditures that
may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold.
20
3
Fire and Rescue
The top project for Fire and Rescue is the construction Fire & Rescue Station #22, a new facility located in the vicinity of Route 277
that would also provide the ability for an annex facility for other County-related offices; also identified as a priority is the apparatus
needed for this facility. Project two includes the construction of Station #23, a new facility located in the vicinity of Crosspointe that
would also provide the ability for an annex facility for other County-related offices; also identified as a priority is the apparatus
needed for this facility.
Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests
The revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established remains a component of
the CIP. This capital expenditure fund is for purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and
equipment that may fall below the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee. It was determined that the inclusion
of such a priority would be beneficial in ensuring that significant capital expenses are identified in the County’s capital planning and
budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Also included are
individual project and priorities from the volunteer stations.
Sheriff’s Office
The Sheriff’s Office has included three projects in their CIP. The top project is the construction of an eight-bay steel building for
housing of large, specialized vehicles that require coverage, followed by replacement law enforcement vehicles, and a firearms
training simulator.
Public Safety Communications
The Project 25 Public Safety Radio Network is top public safety – communications priority. This project includes the purchase,
construction, and deployment of Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Project 25 (P25) radio
communications system to support mission-critical public safety communications within the County. This system will provide radio
and paging communications for the Frederick County Sheriff’s Department, Frederick County Fire & Rescue, volunteer fire & rescue
companies, and the Department of Public Safety Communications.
21
4
Transportation Committee
The Transportation Committee continues to provide project requests for the CIP. Virginia State Code allows for transportation
projects to be included within a locality's CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from a combination of
state funds, developers, revenue sharing, various other revenue programs and possibly local funds used to leverage those funding
sources.
The Transportation Committee has included 26 priority projects. As projects and applications are developed, they could include all
or a key portion a prioritized project. The top three priorities include Route 277 widening and safety improvements (Phase 1), Exit
313 Bridge Replacement and Capacity Improvements, and Renaissance Drive (Phase 2). The inclusion of the Eastern Road Plan
Improvements item at number 27 once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions
made with rezoning projects which are aimed at mitigating potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
Winchester Regional Airport
Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and state governments contribute a majority of
the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding. The construction of a new aviation
terminal to support future airport operations continues to be number one in the CIP, followed by the Taxiway “A” Relocation
(design/construction). Other projects focus on land and easement acquisition in support of airport development to meet Federal
Aviation requirements. The vast majority of the funding for these improvements comes from the FAA and VDA.
22
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
£¤11
£¤522
£¤522
£¤50 £¤11
£¤50
§¨¦66
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
¬«7
¬«37
¬«127
¬«277
¬«55
¬«259
¬«37
Station 16Gainesboro Station 13Clear Brook
Station 19NorthMountain
Station 15Round Hill
Station 18Greenwood
Station 11Stephens City
Station 12Middletown
Station 17Star Tannery
Station 20ReynoldsStore
Station 14Gore 3
4
1
2, 3
3
2
1
1
0 10,000 20,0005,000
Feet
0 2.5 51.25
Miles
V
2022 - 2027Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Plan2022 - 2027Capital ImprovementsSpecific or Approximate Locations
Airport
1 Library Branch - Gainesboro
2 Library Branch - Rt 522 South
3 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood
Library
1 Regional Training Center
2 Fire & Rescue Station 22
3 Fire & Rescue Station 22 Apparatus
4 Fire & Rescue Station 23
Fire & R escue
1
£¤522
2
£¤522
1 Steel Building
Sheriff's Office
1
1 Double Toll Gate Convenience Site Expansion
2 Sunnyside County Office Annex
County Administration
Fire & R escue - Volunteer Stations
Station 21Millwood Station
23
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Middle School
Fourth High School
Elementary School
Elementary School
Elementary School
Multi-Use Campus
Facilities Services
School Board Office
NREP/SRS
DJHC
Transportation Facility
FCMS
JWMS
REAMS
ABMS
GES
SES
RRES
EES
AES
BHES
MES
OVES
IHES
GMES
JSES
£¤11
£¤522
£¤522
£¤50
£¤522
£¤522
£¤11
£¤522
£¤50 £¤11
£¤11
£¤50
§¨¦66
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
¬«7
¬«127
¬«277
¬«55
¬«259
¬«37
SHS
MHS
Win ches ter
Midd leto wn
Ste phe nsCity
!High Schools
!Middle Schools
!Elementary Schools
!Support FacilitiesPotential School Facility Locations
Potential School Locations
Purchased Land
Urban D evelopment Area
SWSA
V
0 2 41 MilesNote:
Created by Frederick County Department of
Planning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests
submitted by Frederick County School Board
01/28/22
School Locations
Are Most
Appropriate
Within the U DA
2022 - 2027Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Plan
Existing and Potential School Locations
APRESJWHSSupport Facilities West
24
[k
[k
Clearbrook
Park
Sherando
Park
Rose Hill
Park
Old Charlestown Road
Park
Frederick Heights
Park
£¤11
£¤522
£¤522
£¤50
£¤522
£¤522
£¤11
£¤522
£¤50 £¤11
£¤11
£¤50
§¨¦66
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
¬«7
¬«127
¬«277
¬«55
¬«259
¬«37
Reynolds
Store
Cross
Junction
Gainesboro
Gore
Clear Brook
Stephenson
Albin
Round HillShawneeland
Star Tannery Armel
V
0 1.5 30.75 Miles
Note:
Created by Frederick County Department of
Planning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests
submitted by the Department of Parks & Recreation
11/24/2021
Proposed Parks
District
Community
Neighborhood
Abrams C reek TrailExisting County Parks
District Park
Community Park
[k Neighborhood ParkPublically Accessible Land
Federal
State
Battlefield
Non-Profit
Local Park
Tuscarora Trail
School
!y Public Boat Launch
Urban Development Area
2022 - 2027Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Pl anNew Parks/Rec Locations
National Forest
EAST
NE
WEST
Winchester
Stephens City
Middletown
25
£¤11
£¤522
£¤522
£¤11
£¤50
£¤50
£¤11
£¤522
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
¬«277
¬«37 Winche ster
Steph ensCity 0 1 20.5 Miles
Frederick County Dept of
Planning & Development
107 N Kent St
Winchester, VA 22601
www.fcva.us
12/21/21
V
2022 - 2027Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovement PlanTransportation Projects
8
8
8
8
1 9
21
24
3
2
222318
106
17
17
17
12
2022 - 2027Capital Improvement PlanTransportation Projects
Unfun ded Prio rities
Funded Priorities
1. ROUTE 277 WID ENING &
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 1)
16
15
2. EXIT 313 BRIDGE REPLACEMENT
& CAPAC ITY IMPROVEMENTS
$+4
3. RENAISSAN CE DR, PHASE 2
4. ROUTE 277; RT TUR N LANE
EXTENSION AT WARRIOR DR$+4
8. CONTIN UE ROUTE 37 PLANNING
& ENGINEERING WOR K
9. ROUTE 277 WID ENING &
SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 2)
10. REDBUD R D REALIGNMENT
13. BR UCETOWN RD/HOPEWELL RD;
ALIGNMENT AND INTERSECTION$+13
14. VALLEY MILL RD
REALIGNMENT (WEST)
15. ROUTE 7 CORRIDOR
IMPROVEMENTS FROM EXIT 315
TO GR EENWOOD RD
16. ROUTE 11 S WIDENING &
INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS
FROM CITY LIMITS TO
OPEQUON C HURCH LN
18. SENSENY R D WIDENIN G
19. SENSENY R D; TURN LANES
AT CR ESTLEIGH DR$+19
20. I-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATIONðñò""307
21. WARRIOR DR EXTENSION
TO NEW EXIT 307
22. CHANNING DR EXTENSION
TO ROUTE 50
23. IN VERLEE WAY; C ONNECTION
FROM SENSENY RD TO ROUTE 50
27. EASTERN ROAD PLAN
IMPROVEMENTS27
6. EXIT 317 INTERCHANGE RAMP
REALIGNMENT
24. WARRIOR DR EXTENSION
FROM ROUTE 37
25. JUBAL EARLY DR EXTEN SION
AND INTERC HANGE WITH ROUTE 37
26. VALLEY MILL RD
REALIGNMENT (EAST)
14
$+19
ðñò""307
20
25 26
$+13
$+7
7. ROUTE 11 AT OLD CHARLESTOWN
RD ROUNDABOUT$+7
$+11
¬«7
11. EXIT 317 INTERCHANGE UPGRADE$+11
5. ROUTE 7 STARS STUD Y PROJECT$+5
$+5 $+5
12. ROUTE 11 N WID ENING FROM
SNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD TO
OLD C HARLESTOWN RD, PHASE 1
17. ROUTE 11 N OF WINCHESTER
WIDENING TO WV LINE, PHASE 2
26
9
THE CIP TABLES - CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS
The Capital Improvements Plan tables, on the following four pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for
the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below.
Projects Ranked by Department - The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects.
County Contribution - The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal
years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year
columns, does not include debt service projections.
Notes - Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects.
Total Project Costs - The cost for each project, including the County allocations and other funding sources.
PROJECT FUNDING
The projects included in Table 1 have a total projected cost to the County of $420,273,581, this figure excludes Airport requests and
transportation projects as these are primarily funded through other sources.
While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five
years.
• School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia
Literary Fund.
• Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The
Parks and Recreation Commission actively seeks grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the
County.
• The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking
these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer
contributions, and revenue sharing.
• Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may
include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester.
27
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by Department 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Department
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Beyond FY
2027
Public Schools Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located throughout the County.
Armel Elementary School Renovation/Expansion $2,000,000 $12,600,000 $3,700,000 $18,300,000 $18,300,000
Old Aylor MS Renovation - Academy $3,000,000 $24,000,000 $16,700,000 $43,700,000 $43,700,000
Sherando High School Renovation/Expansion $5,000,000 $30,000,000 $30,200,000 $10,700,000 $75,900,000 $151,800,000
Fourth High School $8,000,000 $26,000,000 $66,500,000 $100,500,000 $34,000,000
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation $1,000,000 $13,400,000 $4,300,000 $18,700,000 $14,400,000
Onsite Traffic Safety Improvements TBD TBD
Total $5,000,000 $36,600,000 $25,400,000 $39,000,000 $69,600,000 $81,500,000 $257,100,000 $262,200,000
Parks & Recreation
Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $508,915 $1,397,550 $1,882,650 $3,789,115 $3,789,115
Indoor Aquatic Facility $2,303,600 $20,732,400 $23,036,000 $23,036,000
Old Charlestown Road Park $3,570,000 $3,570,000 $3,570,000
Recreation Center $1,039,854 $9,358,686 $10,398,540 $10,398,540
Sherando Park Softball Complex $90,000 $900,000 $990,000 $990,000
Clearbrook Park Development $210,000 $210,000 $420,000 $420,000
Playground Replacement $367,500 $315,000 $157,500 $262,500 $1,102,500 $1,102,500
Sherando Park Area 1 Rec Access Phase 2 $147,400 $1,326,604 $1,474,004 $1,474,004
Sherando Park Area 3 Development $259,704 $2,337,339 $2,597,043 $2,597,043
Sherando Ballfield Light Replacement $990,927 $990,927 $990,927
Community Parks $1,151,850 $1,151,850 $2,303,700 $2,303,700
Neighborhood Parks $543,795 $543,795 $1,087,590 $3,262,770 $5,437,950 $5,437,950
Regional Parks $3,324,300 $3,324,300 $9,972,900 $16,621,500 $16,621,500
Water Slide/Sprayground/Bld Renovation $106,965 $962,681 $1,069,646 $1,069,646
Indoor Ice Rink $1,254,352 $11,289,168 $12,543,520 $12,543,520
South Sherando Park Development $2,587,292 $2,587,292 $2,587,292
Gym Addition Jordan Springs Elem.$153,154 $1,378,384 $1,531,538 $1,531,538
National Guard Armory Gym Addition $661,500 $661,500 $661,500
Fleet Trip Vehicles $358,313 $358,313 $358,313
Sherando Park Area 1 & 2 Development $3,619,893 $3,619,893 $3,619,893
Total $4,746,415 $9,259,680 $35,608,174 $6,188,861 $19,541,825 $19,758,026 $95,102,981 $95,102,981
Regional Library
Gainesboro Library $162,773 $1,407,000 $196,766 $134,688 $1,941,483 $1,901,227
Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD
522 South Library TBD TBD
Total $0 $162,773 $1,407,000 $196,766 $134,688 $1,941,483 $1,901,227
County Administration
Double Toll Gate Convenience Site $35,000 $750,000 $785,000 E $785,000
County Office Annex (Sunnyside)TBD TBD TBD
General Government Capital Expenditures $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 TBD $1,000,000 $1,000,000
County/School Board Administration Building TBD TBD
Joint Judicial Center New Facility TBD TBD TBD
Total $235,000 $950,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,785,000 $1,785,000
Table 1 - 2022-2027 Capital Improvement Plan Requests
28
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by Department 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue Station 22 $7,500,000 $7,500,000 $7,500,000
Station 22 Apparatus $1,100,000 $8,000,000 $9,100,000 $9,100,000
Fire and Rescue Station 23 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
Station 23 Apparatus
Capital Requests Capital Requests $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000
Total $200,000 $200,000 $8,800,000 $200,000 $200,000 $9,200,000 18,800,000 $19,800,000
Fire & Rescue Company
Capital Requests New Clearbrook Fire Station $50,000 $205,000 $4,575,000 $4,830,000
including capital equipment requests New Fire Engine $750,000 $750,000
Reynolds Store Station Addition $173,400 $173,400
Renyolds Store Station Engine Replacement $625,000 $625,000
Reynolds Store Station Parking Updates $150,000 $150,000
Middletown Station Ambulance $300,000 $150,000
Middletown Station Building Renovation/Addition $1,960,000 $1,960,000
Star Tannery Station Pumper Replacement/Ambulance $536,000 $536,000
Stephens City Station Tower 11 Replacement $450,000 $172,000 $107,000 $107,000 $107,000 $672,000 $1,615,000
Unit 11-2 Stephens City Station Ambulance/Medic Unit Replacement $270,000 $270,000
Unit 11-3 Stephens City Station Ambulance/Medic Unit Replacement $310,000 $310,000
Stephens City Station Expansion/Parking Improvements $675,000 $675,000
1 Greenwood Station Ambulance Replacement $298,000 $298,000
Greenwood Station Parking Lot Repair/Upgrade $105,000 $105,000
2 Greenwood Station Ambulance Replacement $310,000 $310,000
3 Greenwood Station Ambulance Replacement $325,000 $325,000
Total $4,842,400 $1,202,000 $4,992,000 $432,000 $417,000 $1,347,000 0 $13,082,400
Sheriffs Office
Eight Bay Steel Building for Large Vehicles $320,000 $320,000 $320,000
Replacement Law Enforcement Vehicles $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 continuous $5,000,000 $5,000,000
Firearms Training Simulator $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Total $1,420,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 5,420,000 $5,420,000
Communications Project 25 Pubic Safety Radio Network 20,981,973 20,981,973 $20,981,973
Total 20,981,973 $20,981,973
Total of All Categories $16,443,815 $49,374,453 $77,407,174 $47,217,627 $91,093,513 $111,805,026 $380,149,464 $420,273,581
Other Funding Sources:E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources
TBD= To be Determined
Public Safety - Fire and Rescue, Sheriff's Office and Communications
29
Projects - Ranked by Agency 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County/VDOT/P
rivate
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond FY 2027
Funded Priorities
Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening
and Safety Improvements (ph 1)$42,144,000 $42,144,000 E $42,144,000
Exit 313 Bridge Replacement and Capacity Improvements $36,593,000 $36,593,000 $36,593,000
Rennaisance Drive, Phase 2 $4,434,150 $4,434,150 E $4,434,150
Route 277 right turn extension Warrior Drive $477,000 $477,000 $477,000
Route 7 STARS Study Project $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000
Exit 317 Interchange Ramp Realignment $6,765,233 $6,765,233 $6,765,233
Route 11 @ Old Charlestown Road Roundabout $5,167,722 $5,167,722 E $5,167,722
Unfunded Priorities
Route 37 Engineering & Construction $811,125,000 $811,125,000 E $811,125,000
Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening
and Safety Improvements (ph 2)$27,500,977 $27,500,977 E $27,500,977
Redbud Road Realignment $5,988,146 $5,988,146 E $5,988,146
Exit 317 Interchange Upgrade $35,000,000 $35,000,000 $35,000,000
Widening of Route 11 North (ph 1)$30,656,329 $30,656,329 E $30,656,329
Brucetown/Hopewell Realign.$8,652,000 $8,652,000 E $8,652,000
Valley Mill Road Realignment West E TBD
Route 7 Corridor Improvements Exit 315 to Greenwood $5,407,500 $5,407,500 $5,407,500
Route 11 S Widening and Intersection Improvements from
Winchester City Limits to Opequon Church Lane $3,568,950 $3,568,950 E $3,568,950
Widening of Route 11 North (ph2)$207,648,000 $207,648,000 E $207,648,000
Senseny Road Widening $72,460,500 $72,460,500 E $72,460,500
Senseny Road turn lanes/improvements Crestleigh Drive $2,756,288 $2,756,288 $2,756,288
I-81 Exit 307 Relocation with 4 ln connection to Double Church and
Stephens City Bypass $253,347,290 $253,347,290 E $253,347,290
Warrior Drive Extension (south)including Brady Lane upgrade $50,830,500 $50,830,500 E $50,830,500
Channing Drive Extension $48,667,500 $48,667,500 E $48,667,500
Inverlee Way $29,524,950 $29,524,950 E $29,524,950
Warrior Drive Extension (Crosspointe south)$36,230,250 $36,230,250 E $36,230,250
Jubal Early Drive Extension and Interchange with Route 37 E TBD
Valley Mill Road Realignment East E TBD
Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD E TBD
Total $96,581,105 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,629,364,180 $1,725,945,285 $1,725,945,285
Other Funding Sources: E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources
The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. Funding projects
will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Table 2 - Transportation Projects - CIP Requests
30
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by Agency 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024-2025 2025-2026 2026-2027 2027+
County
Contributions Notes
Total
Project
Costs
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Beyond
Year 6+
New Terminal $7,500,000 $85,000 A,B,C $7,585,000
Taxiway "A" Relocation $3,680,000 $3,650,000 4,444,444.00$ $4,444,444 A,B,C $16,218,888
Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper)$200,000 A,B,C $200,000
Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Land Services $150,000 A,B,C $150,000
Acquire Land/Easements $270,000 $500,000 A,B,C $770,000
North Side Site Prep $500,000 A,B,C $500,000
North Side Access Road $700,000 A,B,C $700,000
Fuel Storage Facility $500,000 A,B,C $500,000
Master Plan Update $500,000 A,B,C $500,000
Total $11,180,000 $3,735,000 $5,144,444 $5,564,444 $1,500,000 $0 $27,123,888
A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation
B= Partial funding from FAA
C = Partial local funding (% split between Frederick County and Winchester based on Weldon Cooper figures)
Table 3 - Winchester Reginal Airport CIP Requests
*Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local
governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke,
Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester.
31
14
APPENDIX
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
32
15
Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation
Description: Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since that time. The school
contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 580 students. As of October 31, 2021, the school has 641 students.
Six classrooms will be added to Armel ES, to accommodate the additional growth at Lake Frederick. The existing facility will be
updated as needed and core areas partially renovated to serve the additional students.
Capital Cost: $18,300,000
Justification: Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, growth in the attendance zone will need to be
addressed through the addition of classrooms to the facility.
Construction Schedule: FY 24-25
PRIORITY 2 - Renovations of Old Aylor Middle School Facility into an Academy
Description: The original Aylor building served as a middle school from 1969 until 2021. We propose to renovate the building into
an academy that would serve between 700 - 900 students and which could delay the construction of a $125 million high school for
several years. The academy could include innovative instructional career pathways such as STEM, advanced manufacturing, health
and medical sciences, environmental sciences, computer science and cyber security, and culinary arts. The building contains
112,513 square feet. Renovation and an addition would be done to support the academy’s programs’ needs.
Capital Cost: $43,700,000
Justification: The original Aylor building is structurally sound, but renovations and an addition would meet the specific needs
unique to each academy program. Creating spaces designed specifically for each program will ensure the economical, efficient,
and effective operation of the academy for years to come.
Construction Schedule: FY 23-24
PRIORITY 3 – Sherando High School Renovations and Addition
Description: Sherando High School opened in 1993. The facility contains 239,517 square feet and has a program capacity of
1,323 students serving grades 9-12. Several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation, including reorganization and
addition of classrooms and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborative education. Because we want the
33
16
facility to last another 30 years, facility infrastructure will be renewed and updated, and finishes will be refreshed. Other areas
to be addressed are security, traffic safety, and gender equity in athletic facilities.
Capital Cost: $75,900,000
Justification: Sherando is 28 years old and will be at least 32 years old by the time we start to renovate it. Renovations are
needed to ensure the economical, efficient, and effective operation of the school for years to come. Modern instruction
requires that a variety of learning spaces be provided, including collaborative spaces of varying size and project labs (similar
to maker spaces). Transportation safety concerns exist on and around the school site at Sherando during arrival and
dismissal. Sherando does not have a softball field on site, instead using a softball field in Sherando Park. This represents an
equity issue between boys and girls sports and is contrary to FCPS’ policy of equity between boys and girls sports.
Construction Schedule: Beyond 2027
PRIORITY 4 – Fourth High School
Description: The new high school project is proposed to serve students grades 9-12 with a program capacity of 1,250 students
and will address anticipated growth in high school student enrollment in the school division. The site is located at the end of
Justes Drive behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school will be designed for collaborative education, similar to Frederick County MS,
with a variety of learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working
world.
Capital Cost: $100,500,000
Justification: This project will address expected growth in high school student enrollment in the school division over the next
several years.
Construction Schedule: Beyond 2027
PRIORITY 5 – Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation
Description: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School opened in 1974 and has served continuously as an elementary school since that
time. The school and auxiliary building contains 65,120 square feet. The school has a program capacity of 509 students. Currently
the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed, including open
classrooms space, ADA compliance, energy conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarms, electrical, plumbing and mechanical
systems.
Capital Cost: $18,700,000
Justification: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is 47 years old, and renovation is needed to a number of areas to ensure the
34
17
economical and efficient operations of the school for years to come.
Construction Schedule: Beyond 2027
PRIORITY 6 – Onsite Traffic Safety Improvements at Sherando, Greenwood Mill, Frederick County Middle/Gainesboro, Indian
Hollow, and Armel/Transportation
Description: Traffic safety concerns exist at several school sites that require site improvements. These needs have been going
unmet for some time, and so have been combined into a single capital project. Improvements include rearrangement of parking
lots, bus loops and parent drop-off loops, additional site access, improvements to pedestrian facilities, and separation of bus
and car traffic. We are currently working with a civil engineer to produce conceptual/ master plans and estimates for each
school.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This work is needed to provide sites that are as safe as possible. Currently we experience traffic
backups/overloads, conflicting traffic flows, and difficulty entering state roads at these sites during arrival and dismissal. We are
concerned that frustration with the current situations will lead some drivers or walkers to make bad decisions.
Construction Schedule: TBD
35
18
Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 – Abrams Creek Trail
Description: 10' wide, asphalt, shared-use trail along Abrams Creek. From Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is estimated the trail
will have six bridge stream crossings and will be approximately 3 miles in length. As outlined below, the project is envisioned in
three phases of approximately 1 mile each. Each phase will have logical beginning and ending points and be usable trail sections in
themselves. Phase 1 from Senseny Road to Woodstock Lane. Phase 2 from Woodstock Lane to Woody's Place, and Phase 3 from
Woody's Place to Channing Drive.
Capital Cost: $3,789,065
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents and provide an alternate means of entering and
exiting the City of Winchester from Eastern Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as
identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey, and the 2012 Virginia Outdoors Plan Survey.
Construction Schedule: Phase I – FY 23-24, Phase II and III – Beyond FY 27 (The construction schedule will follow VDOT funding.
Phase I is funded through VDOT grant)
PRIORITY 2 – Indoor Aquatic Facility
Description: The approximately 35,000 sf building will likely house a 10-lane competitive pool, 6-lane warm water teaching pool,
meeting rooms, shower and changing rooms, and facilities support areas. The above facility would meet the swimming needs of the
community, including HS level swim teams.
Capital Cost: $23,036,000
Justification: There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By constructing the indoor pool, it would permit the
department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citizen programming provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the
community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and
Recreation Community Survey. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a
facility to offer competitive swim and year-round recreational programming.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25
36
19
PRIORITY 3 – Old Charlestown Road Park Development
Description: Old Charlestown Road Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge development provides land for the
provision of an active recreation park. The above park is to include athletic fields suitable for league play. Fields, restroom, and
parking are part of the park concept.
Capital Cost: $3,570,000
Justification: The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (formerly Stephenson Village) rezoning proffer of 2003
and public input sessions in 2020. Plans are to provide rectangular fields and hard surface courts at this location. There are no
public rectangular fields in the north of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23
PRIORITY 4– Recreation Center
Description: The Recreation Center project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to
accommodate a minimum of two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by indoor soccer, baseball,
softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis, and badminton with the installation of in-floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This
area could also be used for special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden, and home, outdoor, craft, antique, quilt, or
boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities to take place at one time. The facility would also house a
fitness center, multi-purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms.
Capital Cost: $10,398,540
Justification: Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied significantly on the use of the county public
schools to house recreation programs. This arrangement adequately addressed Recreation Center needs for a time, however the
department currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating a situation where the department is limited in its ability to meet
the programming and facility needs of the county residents. A Recreation Center facility will facilitate the department to meet
citizen programming demands and provide the area with a facility to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would
be available to all area residents.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25
37
20
PRIORITY 5-Sherando Park North - Softball Complex
Description: This project completes the development vision for the SE area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277. This vision is
expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are softball fields to complete the complex, a shared use
trail segment, roadway, and parking.
Capital Cost: $990,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields within the
county’s regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth
and adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these programs. This
project is needed in order to meet the growing need for diamond field space and tournament opportunities.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24
PRIORITY 6–Clearbrook Park
Description: This project implements the development vision for the NE area of Clearbrook Park. This vision is consistent with the
Clearbrook Park Master Plan. Included are basketball, pickleball courts, and an access trail from the existing pool parking lot.
Capital Cost: $420,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreation opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. It would provide amenities
not readily available in northeastern Frederick County and provide a public pickleball complex for county residents.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23
PRIORITY 7 - Playground Replacement
Description: This project schedules replacement for playgrounds at County Parks.
Capital Cost: $1,102,500
Justification: County Park playgrounds are popular amenities at county owned parks. The playgrounds will need to be replaced to
meet user expectations.
Construction Schedule: This project is anticipated to be ongoing; a four-year schedule is proposed. Year 1: CB main playground,
Frederick Heights. Year 2: CB 2nd playground, SH 2nd playground. Year 3: SH 3rd playground. Year 4: SH Main playground.
38
21
PRIORITY 8 – Sherando Park Area 1 Recreation Access Phase 2
Description: This project continues the development vision for the NW area of Sherando Park located north of Rt. 277 as shown in
the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Continuing the newly installed Line Drive from Warrior Drive to Landgrant Lane,
parking, restroom building, and dog park are elements of this phase.
Capital Cost: $1,474,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. This project is intended to
meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25
PRIORITY 9 - Sherando Park Area 3 Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for the SW area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277. This vision is
expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are rectangular play fields, a shared use trail segment,
roadway and parking, playground, restroom, and maintenance building.
Capital Cost: $2,597,044
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. With the development of N Sherando Softball Complex
(CIP item #9) two rectangular play fields will be displaced. The development of area 3 not only addresses this direct result, but also
addresses additional identified needs of the community.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25
PRIORITY 10 – Sherando Ballfield Lighting Replacement
Description: Upgrade the ballfield lighting at Sherando Parks Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the
30/20 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and replace with 50/30 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps and steel
poles on (4) four fields at Sherando Park. This standard is required by Little League International on all little league fields. LED light
fixtures are specified, as HID fixtures are facing obsolescence.
Capital Cost: $990,927
Justification: The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfield light system be upgraded to achieve the
recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the playing surface. This will facilitate the provision of recreational opportunities
39
22
at Sherando Park for the service areas which include all Frederick County residents. The field light fixtures are over twenty-five years
old and are affixed to poles.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24
PRIORITY 11 – Community Parks
Description: The Community Park needs include continued development of existing parks, and the acquisition of approximately
thirty-five acres for an additional park located in eastern Frederick County. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by
the specific site, however typical development may include:
Acquisition of Parkland; 35 acres
• Paved & Gravel Paths
• Playground
• Tot lot
• Shelters
• Lighted Basketball & Tennis courts
Capital Cost: $2,303,700
Justification: Potential acreage for parkland would be located close to population density, east of Winchester, Redbud / Shawnee
district area. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to create more accessible recreational facilities and
opportunities to the residents Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
PRIORITY 12 – Neighborhood Parks
Description: The Neighborhood project includes the continued development of existing and acquisition of six new sites of
approximately ten acres and the subsequent development of these sites. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the
specific site, however typical development may include:
Acquisition of Parkland, 10 acres per site
• Paved Path
• Playground
• Shelter
• Hard Surface Courts
40
23
• Open Play Fields
Capital Cost: $5,437,950
Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the
minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the 2013 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the
needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Potential acreage for
parkland would be located in the Urban Development Area or Rural Community Centers.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
PRIORITY 13 – Regional Park
Description: Acquisition and development of parkland:
• Northeastern Frederick County 150-200 acres
• Western Frederick County 150-200 acres
• Eastern Frederick County 150-200 acres
Capital Cost: $15,830,000
Justification: This project would meet the recreation needs of the Frederick County population.
Construction Schedule: Beyond FY27
PRIORITY 14 - Water Slide / Spray Ground / Building Renovation
Description: Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of
the diving boards and the installation of one 50' water slide and one 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also include
the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool.
Capital Cost: $1,069,646
Justification: To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park service area. Frederick County Parks
and Recreation Department operates two outdoor swimming pools at the regional parks. These facilities are over 20 years old and
were constructed with two diving boards as the main feature for each pool. Swimming pool attendance has trended decline in
recent years and users are requesting different water features. The addition of two water slides and a spray ground to each pool
facility will appeal to families and increase interest in visiting the outdoor pool facilities.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
41
24
PRIORITY 15 – Indoor Ice Rink
Description: The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to
accommodate a single 200’ x 85’ ice rink, locker rooms, party/meeting rooms, and concession area and would need approximately
10 acres to construct. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the County. The above ice rink may be
collocated with other compatible uses should opportunities arise, reducing the acreage demand.
Capital Cost: $12,543,520
Justification: There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and county residents currently must travel over one hour to
use an indoor ice facility. By constructing the indoor ice rink, it would permit the department to meet competition needs,
instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as well as provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the
community. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer year-
round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community
as identified in the 2017 FCPRD Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
42
25
Handley Regional Library Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Frederick County Library Branch - Gainesboro
Description: Construction of a 4,000 to 5,000 square foot branch library, either as a stand-alone facility or co-located with a
planned Frederick County facility (e.g. the new middle school). Initial parking should be for at least 50 vehicles. The proposed
location would be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro District, but this could change depending on patterns of library use and on whether
donated land could be located or if co-located with a Frederick County project already in the early planning stage. This projected
branch would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing property and was outlined in a document prepared by FCPS students six years
ago.
Capital Cost: $1,849,034
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area:
In 2020-21...319,761 (traditional) + 73,436 (electronic) = 393,197. Frederick County residents have 35,766 cards and averaged 58.7%
of all materials (inactive users were purged 11/18 per state requirements). As of June 2021, there were 2000 new registrations;
Frederick County residents, adults, and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2020-2021. This population group in
the Gainesboro district is not close to a library in the regional system. This new library would serve a sizeable population of
Frederick County that is not being served. The library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior
citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open
nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets, and
hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will
be a meeting room of 180 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27
PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Library Branch - Senseny/Greenwood
Description: Construction of a 10,000-sf branch library with expansion possible to 15,000-sf. Initial parking should be for a
minimum of 65 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of
the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area:
43
26
In 2020-21...319,761 (traditional) + 73,436 (electronic) = 393,197. Frederick County residents have 35,766 cards and averaged 58.7%
of all materials (inactive users were purged 11/18 per state requirements). As of June 2021, there were 2000 new registrations;
Frederick County residents, adults, and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2020-2021. As noted above the
population group in the Redbud/Shawnee district is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials
and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a
prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will
supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets, and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other
office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 800 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY27
PRIORITY 3 – 522 South Library
Description: Construction of a 7,000-sf branch library with expansion possible to 10,000-sf. Initial parking should be for a
minimum of 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of
the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acre or collocated with the new High School projected to be built in the
same area.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area:
In 2020-21...319,761 (traditional) + 73,436 (electronic) = 393,197. Frederick County residents have 35,766 cards and averaged 58.7%
of all materials (inactive users were purged 11/18 per state requirements). As of June 2021, there were 2000 new registrations;
Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2020-2021. This population group in
the Opequon district is not close to a library in the regional system. This new Library will serve an area of Frederick County largely
unserved by our current branches. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens.
It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on
weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets, and hotspots, via
desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting
room of 425 sf in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY27
44
27
County Administration and Public Works Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Double Toll Gate Citizens' Convenience Site - Expansion
Description: The project will expand refuse capacity in the growing Double Toll Gate, Lake Frederick, eastern Stephens City and
Armel communities by adding a second trash compactor, poured concrete wall, and other site improvement, greatly enhancing
traffic flow and efficiency. The current site is situated in Clarke County and is leased from the state at no cost. The facility also serves
Clarke residents. Clarke shares in collection and disposal costs (21 percent) while Frederick maintains the site and provides labor.
Construction and all site improvements will take place over a period of months while the site remains open.
Capital Cost: $750,000
Justification: A total of 8,525 vehicle trips were made to the facility during August 2021, a number consistent with 2019 figures
which showed a hike of 11 percent over 2018. With an average of 253 trips recorded per day, Double Toll Gate is one of the county's
busiest refuse and recycling sites. A second compactor would double capacity. Traffic flow would be enhanced and the need to close
early on holidays and some weekends eliminated. This location has served the area well since the late 1970's. A recycling pad and
new pavement were added in 2009. Additional upgrades are now necessary in order to meet the growing demands of solid waste
management.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25
PRIORITY 2– County Office Annex (Former Sunnyside Plaza Shopping Center)
Description: This project consists of the renovation of an existing shopping center containing approximately 64,000 square feet
located at the Intersection of Fox Drive and Route 522 in the County’s Urban Development Area. This project will accommodate the
relocation of certain departments (TBD) from the 107 N. Kent Street complex to this County office annex in order to address existing
and future space needs of County departments.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the
benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government
services in an accessible location.
Construction Schedule: TBD
45
28
PRIORITY 3 - General Government Capital Expenditures
Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of General Governmental Capital
Expenditures. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for
governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities. Such expenditures may be less than the
established $100,000 departmental threshold. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring
that this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is for the benefit of
the County Governmental Entities participating in the CIP but does not include individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental
agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the
Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the governmental entities.
Construction Schedule: N/A
PRIORITY 4 - County/School Board Administration Building
Description: This project consists of a County/School Board Administration Building, to be located generally in the County’s Urban
Development Area. The Joint Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150,000 square foot office building shared with the
County Schools Administration. The Schools’ portion would be 50,000 square feet.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the
benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government
services in an accessible location.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 5 - Joint Judicial Center New Facility
Description: This new project consists of a new future Joint Judicial Center Facility to be located generally in the City of Winchester
or in the County’s Urban Development Area.
Capital Cost: TBD
46
29
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the
benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government
services in an accessible location. The need for this project has been established through ongoing communication with the court
system and the City of Winchester.
Construction Schedule: TBD
47
30
Fire & Rescue Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Frederick County Fire & Rescue Station 22
Description: Construct a three-bay Fire and Rescue Station with availability for satellite Sheriff’s office and County office space for
Treasurer’s, Commissioner of the Revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. The station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike,
White Oak Road and Tasker Road to provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three-acre site
will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be approximately a 15,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and
ambulance with additional bay space for special service vehicle, brush truck, tanker and additional reserve and support vehicles.
Those who would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite offices.
Capital Cost: $7,500,000
Justification: Development near this area will necessitate the development of this station. The Lake Frederick development is
scheduled to be an active adult resort gated community with age restrictions on 80% of the homes above 55 and the other 20%
above 45. The developer’s master plan will allow for 2,130 individual dwelling units using a mix of housing types.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25.
PRIORITY 1A - Frederick County Fire and Rescue Station 22 Apparatus
Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable
ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22.
Capital Cost: $1,100,000
Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East area of
Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary
equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped
with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25.
PRIORITY 2 - Fire and Rescue Station 23 / Annex Facilities
Description: Construct three-bay fire station with availability for satellite offices for the Frederick County Sheriff’s Office,
Treasurer’s Office, and Commissioner of Revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. square feet of building area. An approximately
48
31
three-acre site will be needed to accommodate the facility. The fire station will be approximately a 15,000-sq ft facility to house an
engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite offices.
The project has historically been planned for and to be located at Crosspointe Center at the end of current Rt. 37 South, an area of
proposed high-density residential development, and commercial development. Additional evaluation is needed given growth in
other areas of the county.
Capital Cost: $8,00,000
Justification: As commercial and residential developments continue to expand in this area of Frederick County, and with the
increased traffic on Rt. 37 and I-81, the calls for emergency services increases as well. To address the needs of the growing
community and to maintain efficient response times, the addition of a new fire and rescue station is needed.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 27-28.
PRIORITY 2A - Frederick County Fire and Rescue Station 23 Apparatus
Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable
ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 23.
Capital Cost: $1,200,000
Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East area of
Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary
equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped
with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 27-28.
Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue – Vehicles & Equipment
Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services. It is
the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire
and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this
significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
49
32
Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital
equipment AND fire and rescue vehicles and equipment, will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia
with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire and rescue companies.
Construction Schedule: N/A
Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital and Capital Equipment Requests
Clearbrook Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – New Fire Station
Description: At the present time the Clear Brook Vol. Fire & Rescue has outgrown the existing building with the equipment on
hand, the call volume, the staffing of 24-hour personnel and the traffic at the existing location. We are proposing a new building to
be located within the Clear Brooks first due area. The building needs to be approximately a 100x100 Administration and living with a
100x60 / 4 - Truck Bay all single level. The building will be used for day-to-day operations, administration, eating and sleeping facility
of the current career staffing, volunteers, and future staffing. The estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 16,000
square feet. This upgrade of the facility will help to provide the needed space for Fire and EMS services for the community of Clear
Brook. The estimated size of the structure is to be approximately 16,000 square feet. This upgrade of the facility will help to provide
the needed space for Fire and EMS services for the community of Clear Brook.
Capital Cost: $4,830,000
Justification: With the current facility and needed for upgrade in living quarters to accommodate the overnight personnel 24 hours
and volunteers, this is of the utmost priority. At the current time we have outgrown our facility and with the equipment that we
have to provide the service to our community for the health and property protection and with the current staffing needs and fund-
raising operations our current facility is in need of upgrading/updating.
Construction Schedule: FY 24-25
Clearbrook Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – New Engine
Description: Funding to support the purchase of a new fire engine for the Clear Brook Station. The new pumper would provide
services to Clear Brook, Stephenson, Winchester, and numerous other areas located in Frederick County and immediately
surrounding jurisdictions. This new piece of apparatus would replace a current pumper that has been in service since 2001. This
piece of apparatus will be specifically designed to meet and exceed the needs of our ever changing and rapidly growing community.
50
33
This vehicle will be utilized to supply members, both career and volunteer, with a safe means of transport to and from emergency
incidents and other necessary tasks. A new pumper would also bring necessary hose, water, and other firefighting equipment to the
scene of various emergency incidents.
Capital Cost: $750,000
Justification: As stated above, this unit would replace a 2001 fire engine. This engine, identified as Wagon 13, is still running as a
front-line piece of fire apparatus. According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) a front-line piece of apparatus should
strongly be considered being replaced after 15 years and moved to a “reserve” status. This puts Wagon 13 approximately 6 years
over its suggested first-in-service lifetime. Furthermore, the NFPA goes on to state that after 20 years the apparatus should be
retired. Currently Wagon 13 is approaching 21 years old. This means that Wagon 13 should be retired as soon as possible.
Unfortunately, fire and rescue apparatus are complicated machines with a multitude of intricate systems to allow them to perform
as desired. This causes these units to malfunction more regularly and need to be maintained more often than the typical vehicle.
Clear Brook Volunteer Fire and Rescue Inc. strives to keep a constant service to our community. This means that we must maintain
two pieces of fire apparatus at all times in case of the event one must be pulled out of service for repairs or preventative
maintenance. We are unable to remove the Wagon from service until we get a replacement as this would put a strain on our
department, and it would hinder our abilities to provide the best service we can to our citizens.
Construction Schedule: FY 22-23
Reynolds Store Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Building Addition
Description: Proposed addition to the existing kitchen of Station 20. The proposed 700 sf would be added to the northeast side of
the existing kitchen. The new area would allow for more workspace, efficiency, and allow the addition of new and improved
equipment. The addition would also allow more people to work in the kitchen without creating a safety hazard. A 200 sf addition is
also proposed for the southwest side of the station to accommodate a gear washer.
Capital Cost: $116,400
Justification: The kitchen area at Station 20 is small and inefficient. The proposed addition would allow for approximately 10
additional kitchen staff and new equipment which would improve safety and efficiency. The gear washroom is needed to house a
new gear washer.
Construction Schedule: FY 22-23
51
34
Reynolds Store Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Engine 20 Replacement
Description: Replacement of the existing engine 20.
Capital Cost: $625,000
Justification: The current engine is a 1995 model and has become outdated and experiences numerous breakdowns. Parts are
difficult to obtain and often modifications are needed to get the engine operating again.
Construction Schedule: FY 22-23
Reynolds Store Station – Parking Lot Restoration/Entrance
Description: Repaving the existing asphalt entrance and parking lot and the addition of a second entrance approximately 250’
south of the current entrance which would connect to the existing lot.
Capital Cost: $150,000
Justification: The existing pavement for the Station 20 lot is in poor condition, the asphalt is cracked, and potholes are forming.
The second entrance would help with ingress and egress to the facility during fundraising events.
Construction Schedule: FY 23-24
Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company– Building Renovation and Addition
Description: Demolish original building and 1st addition to the station. Build back in that location tied back into the 3rd addition.
This addition would be designed to provide additional sleeping, bathroom, and office areas for future growth in our system.
Currently we are almost at max capacity in the bunk rooms for volunteers and staff. And taller apparatus bay and entry doors.
Capital Cost: $1,960,000
Justification: It is essential for Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Inc. to maintain our capabilities in emergency
response and the facilities to house the apparatus, tools and equipment and provide suitable living quarters for our system
members. Currently we are maxed on room for sleeping and office space. Our one apparatus bay area has small doors and short
ceiling that restricts what can be parked in that section.
Construction Schedule: FY 22-23
52
35
Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – New Ambulance
Description: New ambulance to replace a 2012 Dodge Horton unit
Capital Cost: $330,000
Justification: This new unit would replace an older unit which currently the only ambulance and the station has seen an increase in
call volume.
Construction Schedule: FY 23-24
Star Tannery Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Replacement Pumper
Description: Replacement of a 27-year-old unit with a Piece Saber Pumper GVW – 1250 GPM/1,000 gallons of water.
Capital Cost: $536,000
Justification: The current unit is outdated and needs to be replaced.
Construction Schedule: FY 23-24
Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company– Tower 11 Replacement
Description: Replacement of a 1986 custom chassis ladder tower truck with a new year custom chassis ladder tower truck. The
apparatus will be built to NFPA 1901 specifications and equipped with the required tools and appliances to meet ISO standards at
the time of build. The apparatus will meet NFPA standards and ISO requirements at the time of design. The contract is currently in
place for the construction of this unit.
Capital Cost: $1,615,000
Justification:
1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing fire apparatus.
2. Condition of Major Components - An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive
train, transmission, engine, ladder, platform, hydraulic systems, pump, chassis, and body. These components are approaching the
expected service life or have already been replaced.
3. Availability of Replacement Parts - As apparatus get older, replacement parts may become more difficult to obtain, leading to
longer periods of "down time." This unit has been out of service for approximately eight months over the last two years.
Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 27
53
36
Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Medic Unit Replacement (type 1) UNIT 11-2
Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit
will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all required and necessary equipment to
function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO
requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for
medicines required for EMS.
Capital Cost: $270,000
Justification:
1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS
apparatus.
2. Condition of Major Components-An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive
train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life.
3. Changes in National Standards and Federal Mandates - Compliance with present Federal KKK-A-1822E, NFPA 1500, Standard on
Fire Service Occupational Safety and Health Program and NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances.
Construction Schedule: FY 23-24
Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Ambulance/Medic Unit Replacement (Type 1) Existing 11-3
Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit
will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment
to function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO
requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for
medicines required for EMS.
Capital Cost: $310,000
Justification:
1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS
apparatus.
2. Condition of Major Components-An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive
train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life.
3. Changes in National Standards and Federal Mandates - Compliance with present Federal KKK-A-1822E, NFPA 1500, Standard on
54
37
Fire Service Occupational Safety and Health Program and NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances.
Construction Schedule: FY 26-27
Stephens City Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Building Expansion and Parking Lot Improvements
Description: Addition of "Living Quarters and Office space (Approx. 3,000 sf ), off the back of the current living space. Both levels
and matching the existing roof line and construction. Installation of concrete curb and gutter and asphalt pavement with 3" HMA.
Overlay existing parking lot with 1" HMA. Replacement of front concrete ramp to current VDOT concrete apron/loading dock
specifications.
Capital Cost: $675,000
Justification: Additional space will be required for living conditions as additional personnel are added to the station. The loose
gravel in the existing parking lot is a safety concern for slips and falls. The existing concrete ramp is a safety concern for trips and
falls at existing concrete cracks.
Construction Schedule: Beyond FY 27
Greenwood Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Ambulance Replacement - 1
Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit
will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment
to function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO
requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for
medicines required for EMS.
Capital Cost: $298,000
Justification: Greenwood is one of the busiest stations in the county responding to approximately 2,000 EMS calls per year.
1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS
apparatus.
2. Condition of Major Components-An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive
train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life.
Construction Schedule: FY 22-23
55
38
Greenwood Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Parking Repairs and Upgrades
Description: Refurbish the Parking Lot:
Crack Repairs: a significant portion of the paving immediately in front of the truck bays exhibits moderate to significant cracking and
"alligatoring". This area is approximately 11,000 sf, or 1,225 sq. yds. Seal coating: application of 2 coats of a coal tar based, latex
fortified, abrasive filled sealer to all asphalt pavement. Pavement Markings: repaint all existing pavement markings at this site
including parking spaces, (8) handicap emblems with (blue) box backgrounds, all painted "no parking" cross-hatched areas, etc. We
will also reset, realign, and reanchor the existing concrete.
Capital Cost: $105,000
Justification: The existing front apron is deteriorating due to the weight of the equipment and the right-of-way draining under the
apron. The reminder of the parking lot needs to be stabilized and resurfaced.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24
Greenwood Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Ambulance Replacement - 2
Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit
will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment
to function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO
requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for
medicines required for EMS.
Capital Cost: $310,000
Justification: Greenwood is one of the busiest stations in the County responding to approximately 2,000 EMS calls per year.
1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS
apparatus.
2. Condition of Major Components-An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive
train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life.
Construction Schedule: FY 24-25
Greenwood Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company – Ambulance Replacement - 3
Description: Replacement of a commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit
56
39
will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment
to function as an advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO
requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for
medicines required for EMS.
Capital Cost: $325,000
Justification: Greenwood is one of the busiest stations in the County responding to approximately 2,000 EMS calls per year.
1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS
apparatus.
2. Condition of Major Components-An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive
train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components are approaching the expected service life.
Construction Schedule: FY 25-26
57
40
Sheriff’s Office Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 – 8 Bay Steel Building for Large Vehicles
Description: Construct an 8-bay steel building for housing of large, specialized vehicles that require coverage due to the large
amount of equipment and specialized tools. This project does not require the purchase of land as it will be constructed on the
property of the Frederick County Sheriff's Office Impound Lot. The building will allow for the maintenance, storage, security of all the
large, specialized vehicles that are required for the special operations teams. This building size will be 4,256 square feet and will
require 13,500 square feet to build. This will be an 8-bay, 4-garage door equipment storage building with a 35x76 front concrete
pad.
Capital Cost: $320,000
Justification: This project will facilitate the required housing of vehicles that are used for the special purpose teams. These vehicles
are required to be protected from the weather to ensure quick responses to emergencies. Protecting the vehicles will allow the
longevity of the vehicle by reducing engine wear and exposure to fluctuating weather conditions. Due to these vehicles belonging to
specialty teams, the vehicles house important and expensive equipment. This equipment allows personnel of each specialty team to
conduct the mission at hand. Much of the equipment has to be maintained at certain temperatures.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23
PRIORITY 2 – Replacement Law Enforcement Vehicles
Description: This project is to indicate projected cost of replacement vehicles to the fleet of the Frederick County Sheriff's Office
over the next five years. This will ensure the replacement of end of service life vehicles to the Sheriff's Office fleet as well as cost
effectiveness for repairs to failing vehicles.
Capital Cost: $5,200,000
Justification: This project is needed to meet the basic requirements for Law Enforcement Officers when responding to calls,
patrolling of the County, community safety and safety of the Officers. This will offset the cost of purchasing vehicles that were not
replaced during the 2010-2012 budget years due to budget restraints. This schedule would drop the cost of purchasing 46 vehicles
per year to approximately 25 per year on a rotating basis.
Construction Schedule: Multi-year objective
58
41
PRIORITY 3 – Firearms Simulated Training System
Description: This project will be used to do use of force training for the entire Sheriff's Office and selected members of the public.
The simulated trainer does firearms training, ASP training, pepper spray training, taser training and less lethal training. The trainer is
used to simulate real life situations so that deputies use the appropriate amount of force, hopefully lowering the Sheriff's Office civil
liability in use of force situations. The simulator can also be used to demonstrate the complexity of use of force situations to the
public.
Capital Cost: $100,000
Justification: Provide real life training to all deputies and reduce the civil liability the Sheriff's Office could face in excessive use of
force cases.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23
Public Safety and Communications
PRIORITY 1 – Project 25 Public Safety Radio Network
Description: Purchase, construction, and deployment of Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO)
International Project 25 (P25) radio communications system to support mission-critical public safety communications within the
County. This system will provide radio and paging communications for the Frederick County Sheriff’s Department, Frederick County
Fire & Rescue, volunteer fire & rescue companies, and the Department of Public Safety Communications.
Capital Cost: $20,981,973
Justification: This Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials (APCO) International Project 25 (P25) radio
communications system is needed to support mission-critical public safety communications within the County.
Construction Schedule: FY 23-24
59
42
Transportation Committee Project Priority List
Funded Priorities
PRIORITY 1 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1)
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Double Church Road. Project would include
realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive.
Capital Cost: $42,144,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address
development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 2 – Exit 313 Bridge Replacement and Capacity Improvements
Description: Replace the structurally deficient bridge at Exit 313 and add limited capacity improvements.
Capital Cost: $36,593,000
Justification: The bridge on Route 17/50/522 (Millwood Pike) Bridge over Interstate 81 at Exit 313 is reaching the end of its service
life and needs to be replaced. The new bridge will feature design elements that will accommodate future improvements to the
Route 17/50/522 corridor and future improvements to I-81. The interchange configuration will not change with this project.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 3 - Renaissance Drive, Phase 2
Description: Construct a connector road and Railroad Crossing between Route 11 and Shady Elm Drive.
Capital Cost: $4,434,150
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at key points along Route 11 and Apple Valley
Drive. This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
60
43
PRIORITY 4 - Route 277 right turn lane extension at Warrior Drive
Description: Extend right-turn lane for eastbound 277 at the intersection of Rt. 277 and Warrior Drive. Installation of sidewalk for
pedestrian safety and installation of pedestrian pedestal.
Capital Cost: $477,000
Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 5 – Route 7 STARS Study Project
Description: Consolidate turning movements at Blossom Drive/Millbrook Drive and Route 7 as well as at First Woods
Drive/Greenwood Road and Route 7 to reduce conflicts and improve efficiency.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to these intersections.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 6 -Exit 317 Interchange Ramp Realignment Project
Description: Relocate the existing northbound exit ramp at I-81 Exit 317 and Route 11 to the current location of the Redbud Road
intersection. This project will include turn lane upgrades on to the exit ramp from Route 11 North to I-81 northbound and removal
of the signal that will be made redundant by the realignment.
Capital Cost: $6,765,233
Justification: This improvement will upgrade traffic flow and safety through the interchange area.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 7 – Route 11 @ Old Charlestown Road Roundabout installation
Description: Upgrade the temporary signal that is currently in place to the roundabout design that VDOT has identified for this
intersection.
Capital Cost: $5,167,722
61
44
Justification: This improvement will improve traffic flow and safety at this intersection while minimizing the impact to traffic
throughput north and south on Route 11.
Construction Schedule: TBD
Unfunded Priorities
PRIORITY 8 - Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37
Description: This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension. More specifically, to update the
Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new Record of Decision and to update the 1992 design plans to address the
current alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvements. In addition, this allows for advanced
engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction.
Capital Cost: $811,125,000
Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation improvement that would benefit the entire
County and surrounding localities.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 9 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2)
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Sherando Park. Project would include
realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive.
Capital Cost: $27,500,977
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address
development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 10 - Redbud Road Realignment
Description: The funding of the Exit 317 Ramp realignment makes this realignment critical for trips that currently use Redbud Road
which total nearly 3,000 vehicles per day. VDOT has made it a requirement for the ramp realignment to move forward.
Capital Cost: $5,988,146
62
45
Justification: This project is required to be underway in conjunction with or prior to the Exit 317 Ramp realignment and the Board
has submitted a revenue sharing application to move it forward. The application is currently under review.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 11- Exit 317 Interchange Upgrade
Description: The funded ramp realignment project is one component of the overall needed upgrade to the interchange at I-81 Exit
317. This project calls for the full upgrade of the interchange.
Capital Cost: $35,000,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County and is identified in
the Eastern Road Plan. Staff is currently working with the MPO and the Office of Intermodal Planning and Investment on a pipeline
study to continue to refine the application to increase its competitiveness for state funds.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 12 - Route 11 North Widening to 6 Lanes from Snowden Bridge Boulevard to Old Charlestown Road (Ph 1)
Description: Route 11 North of Snowden Bridge Boulevard is currently primarily a two-lane roadway. This project would widen that
facility to a 6-lane divided roadway with turn lanes where appropriate.
Capital Cost: $30,656,329
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will provide a significant capacity upgrade to address congestion on the
Route 11 Corridor. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 13 - Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements
Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11. Improvements to this intersection will address
comprehensive planned development’s traffic generation in the area.
Capital Cost: $8,652,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on the Route 11 corridor. The location is
identified by joint planning efforts between the County and VDOT.
Construction Schedule: TBD
63
46
PRIORITY 14- Valley Mill Road Realignment (West)
Description: This project would reduce or remove the intersection of Valley Mill Road and Route 7 and realign the roadway to a new
intersection with Route 7 at Gateway Drive.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The interchange area at I-81 Exit 315 where Valley Mill Road intersects is currently one of the most congested areas in
Frederick County. This improvement would result in better spacing and fewer conflicting movements through the interchange area.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 15 – Route 7 Corridor Improvements from Exit 315 to Greenwood Road
Description: Spot improvements throughout the corridor to be determined through ongoing study in coordination with VDOT.
Capital Cost: $5,407,500
Justification: The County is engaged in a STARS study with VDOT through the MPO. This study will be used to identify key spot
improvements to be addressed under this item.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 16 – Route 11 S Widening & Intersection Improvements from Winchester City Limits to Opequon Church Lane
Description: Route 11 S, NB side widening and improvements to the intersection of Shawnee Drive at Route 11 and Opequon Church
Lane at Route 11.
Capital Cost: $3,568,950
Justification: Transportation study conducted in conjunction with the MPO and VDOT determined that these improvements would
significantly improve congestion and safety in the area. In addition, this improvement would promote the Comprehensive Plan
vision for this area.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 17- Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line (Ph 2)
Description: Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the Eastern Road Plan.
Capital Cost: $207,648,000
64
47
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion over a large area of the County and
address development to the surrounding area. This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and
improving the flow of traffic.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 18 - Senseny Road Widening
Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not dependent upon but is being coordinated with the
implementation of Route 37, Channing Drive, and development in the area.
Capital Cost: $72,460,500
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. This project is
identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 19 - Senseny Road Turn lanes at the intersection of Senseny Road and Crestleigh Drive
Description: Improvements to the intersection of Senseny Road (657) and Crestleigh Drive to include turn lanes and potential
signalization. This project would add left and right turn lanes to Senseny Road at the intersection of Crestleigh Drive and potentially
a full signalization of the intersection.
Capital Cost: $2,756,288
Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 20- Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation
Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost: $253,347,290
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address
coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
65
48
PRIORITY 21- Warrior Drive Extension (south) including Brandy Lane Upgrade
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior Drive intersects from the north and
continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with I-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost: $50,830,500
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address
development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 22 - Channing Drive Extension
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where Channing Drive intersects from the north and
continuing that roadway south to intersect with Route 50 East at Independence Drive.
Capital Cost: $48,667,500
Justification: This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan and will address congestion in Eastern Frederick County and
address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 23 - Inverlee Way
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south to Route 50 East. This project is being
planned in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and surrounding development.
Capital Cost: $29,524,950
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion and provide an additional needed link
between Senseny Road and Route 50 East.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 24 - Warrior Drive Extension from Route 37 Crosspointe south to existing terminus
Description: 4-lane roadway from the Route 37 extension in the Crosspointe Development south to the existing terminus of Warrior
Drive.
Capital Cost: $36,230,250
66
49
Justification: This improvement would be concurrent with a Route 37 extension and would provide significant congestion relief at
Exit 307 as well as Tasker Road at Exit 310.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 25- Jubal Early Drive Extension and Interchange with Route 37
Description: This project would extend Jubal Early Drive as a 4-lane facility from Winchester to an interchange with Route 37. This
would include a partial realignment of Merrimans Lane.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This project would add additional east/west connectivity as well as reducing traffic loads at the Route 50 and Cedar
Creek Grade interchanges with Route 37.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 26- Valley Mill Road Realignment (East)
Description: This project would reduce or remove the intersection of Valley Mill Road and Route 7 to the east and realign the
roadway to a new intersection with Route 7 at Future Route 37.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: As the road network and approved development in this area develops this new connection will provide a much more
efficient and safer network for the community.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 27 - Frederick County Eastern Road Plan
Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan,
Eastern Road Plan that are not noted individually above.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This project prepares the County for future development by addressing the projects needed to support that
development in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Construction Schedule: N/A
67
50
Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - New Airport Terminal
Description: The Airport proposes design, bid, and construction of a new terminal building. The new facility will be constructed
south of the existing building.
Capital Cost: $7,585,000
Justification: The project will construct a new terminal building to accommodate a relocated taxiway and aircraft parking apron and
address numerous building systems in need of rehabilitation/replacement.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24
PRIORITY 2 – Taxiway “A” Relocation
Description: The relocation of Taxiway A is part of the overall goal to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) airport standards
to maintain CAT I Instrument Landing System (ILS) weather minimums and meet airport design criteria for Group III aircraft.
Capital Cost: $16,218,888
Justification: This project improves the safety of airport operations and enhances our ability to accommodate large business
aircraft. Due to the complexity of relocating the entire 5,500’ taxiway, the project will be completed in phases.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
PRIORITY 3 – Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper)
Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B-A-60: Cooper off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
design standards for the taxiway object free area (TOFA) for Taxiway "A". Services include appraisals, review appraisals,
negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel.
Capital Cost: $200,000
Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and
the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstructions
or incompatible land use in this area.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 24-25
68
51
PRIORITY 4 – Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) Land Services
Description: Surveys, appraisals, review appraisals, and acquisition of 4 avigation easements identified on the airport property
map; PE2, PE3, PE4, and PE5.
Capital Cost: $150,000
Justification: The parcels underlie the approach path to Runway 14. Certain land uses have the potential to cause negative impacts
to airport operations. Avigation easements will help protect the airport from consequences that may result from obstructions or
incompatible land uses in these areas.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
PRIORITY 5 – Acquire Land/Easements
Description: The airport seeks to acquire easements scoped for purchase in the "RPZ Land Services" project; identified as PE2, PE3,
PE4, and PE5 on the airport property map.
Capital Cost: $770,000
Justification: The parcels underlie the approach path to Runway 14. Certain land uses have the potential to cause negative impacts
to airport operations. Avigation easements protect the airport from consequences that may result from obstructions or
incompatible land uses in these areas.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27
PRIORITY 6 – North Side Site Prep
Description: Site preparation (e.g., grading, utilities) for future aeronautical development and commercial entrance onto airport
property off Coverstone Drive extended.
Capital Cost: $500,000
Justification: The area on the north side of the airport has been through the NEPA environmental approval process. It is the most
attractive area on the airport for build-to-suit facilities. The project will make it more attractive to private investment and is in
keeping with the airport's business and marketing plans.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27
69
52
PRIORITY 7 – North Side Access Road
Description: This project proposes to construct a two-lane service road around the end of Runway 14. The road will be an
appropriate length so that vehicles remain clear of navigation aid critical areas.
Capital Cost: $700,000
Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development on the north side of the runway. With operations on both
sides of the runway, ground vehicles will require access to both sides for fuel delivery, inspections, maintenance, and transportation
of personnel. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) encourages the construction of service roads around aircraft activity areas
to prevent unauthorized access to runways and taxiways.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 25-26
PRIORITY 8 –Fuel Storage Facility Renovation
Description: The current facility is in need of renovation to continue to meet DEQ and/or EPA requirements.
Capital Cost: $600,000
Justification: The fuel storage facility has not undergone major maintenance since it was installed. This project is to renovate the
facility to ensure it continues to meet DEQ and EPA requirements.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27
PRIORITY 9 –Master Plan Update
Description: An airport master plan is a comprehensive study of an airport and usually describes the short-, medium-, and long-
term development plans to meet future aviation demand. An airport master planning effort will be conducted in accordance with
FAA Advisory Circular AC 150/5070-6B.
Capital Cost: $500,000
Justification: The airport's master plan has not been substantially revised since 2005. An airport master plan should be updated
periodically, as it captures a 20-year planning horizon.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 26-27
70
Planning Commission
Agenda Item Detail
Meeting Date: February 16, 2022
Agenda Section: Other
Title: Current Planning Applications
Attachments:
71