Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-20 Statement of Compliance and JustificationStatement of Compliance and Justification for AT&T's Proposed 199' Monopole Telecommunication Facility at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 Applicants: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC (d/b/a AT&T Mobility) 7150 Standard Drive Hanover, MD 21076 Rocon, LLC 9101 Chesapeake Ave Sparrows Point, MD 21219 Representatives: Gregory E. Rapisarda and Douglas A. Sampson Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, LLP 500 East Pratt Street, Suite 900 Baltimore, MD 21202-3171 (410) 332-8661 Greg. Rapisarda@saul.com Douglas.Sampson@saul.com AT&T Site #: 4124 "Frog Eye Sirbaugh" FA# 10138153 Property Owner: Hott Emma J. Etals Tax Map/Parcel: 26-A-29 Instrument #: 18 0012690 Property Address: 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 Zoning Designation: RA (Rural Area) Magisterial District: Gainesboro Jurisdiction: Frederick County, Virginia Acreage: 14.37 acres Pursuant to Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia and Chapter 23 and Sections 165-103 and 165-204.19 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance ("Zoning Code"), New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility ("AT&T"), by and through its agent/counsel, Saul Ewing Arnstein & Lehr, LLP, and Rocon, LLC hereby request a determination that the proposed wireless telecommunication application described herein is in substantial compliance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan and is authorized for a conditional use. We appreciate your time and consideration in review of this application for a Conditional Use Permit. The following document and attached Exhibits provide a justification for AT&T's proposal, and a brief explanation as to how and why this proposal conforms with the Zoning Code. This information, as well as additional and clarifying evidence to be presented at an upcoming public hearing, provide the foundation for approving AT&T's 36297050.6 04/06/2020 application for a Conditional Use Permit. The following Exhibits are attached to this Justification Statement: EXHIBITS Exhibit 1 RF Justification Statement Exhibit 2 AT&T Wireless Broadband Usage During COVID-19 Crisis Exhibit 3 AT&T FirstNet Information Sheets Exhibit 4 Maps of AT&T Search Area Exhibit 5 Site Plan in 8.5" x 1 I" Exhibit 6 Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stable, and Olfunke O. Fagbami, Cell Phone Towers Do Not Affect Property Values, American Bar Association Probate & Property (May/June 2016) Exhibit 7 Engineering Certification Letter Exhibit 8 RF Emissions Compliance Letter Exhibit 9 Affidavit of Tower Removal Exhibit 10 FCC NEPA Survey Exhibit 11 County Agency Comment Sheets I. AT&T'S GOALS AND NEED FOR IMPROVED WIRELESS SERVICES AT&T is licensed by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to provide wireless telecommunications services in Frederick County, Virginia. Pursuant to Zoning Code § 165-401.03, a telecommunications tower is permitted in the RA District with a conditional use. AT&T needs the proposed telecommunications tower to provide and improve the delivery of emergency and non -emergency wireless and broadband services to residents in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed telecommunications facility will add and improve AT&T's wireless broadband services near the Virginia/West Virginia border along Route 50 (Northwestern Turnpike), SR -707, SR -610, SR -703, SR -259, and in the surrounding Gore, Virginia community. (See RF Justification Statement attached as Exhibit 1). The proposed facility will include in -building coverage in the commercial and residential areas along Fairview Road, Fletcher Road, and Maple Hills Drive. (See Ex. 1). The proposed facility will ensure adequate overlapping coverage between and among AT&T's existing facilities to the east. Ultimately, the proposed facility will allow residents and commuters to experience better quality, improved broadband access, and diminished dropped calls. The necessity of accessible and reliable wireless broadband services has never been more clear. According to the FCC, more than half of the families in the United States have only cellular phones, with no "landline" in their home. More than 80% of 9- 1-1 calls are made from mobile phones. During the COVID-19 crisis, wireless and broadband services became essential for millions of Americans who were forced to stay home. Adequate coverage allowed people to telework, participate in teleconferences, attend virtual school lessons, visit remotely with a doctor or therapist, attend online worship services, and keep in touch with family members and friends. 362970%6 04/06/2020 2 Over the first three weeks of the COVID-19 crisis, AT&T saw a significant increase in voice calling, instant messaging, text messages, and video services. See AT&T Wireless Broadband Usage During COVID-19 Crisis attached as Exhibit 2). The use of audio -conferencing solutions and large-scale webcast events each tripled, as business and schools adapted to the need for remote communications. (See Ex. 2). The usage of audio, web, and video conferencing tools increased by five times. See Ex. 2). Having sufficient and reliable wireless broadband coverage has never been more important. II. FIRST RESPONDER NETWORK AUTHORITY ("FIRSTNET") The proposed site will enhance and expand the First Responder Network Authority ("FirstNet") in Frederick County. FirstNet is a nationwide high-speed broadband communications platform dedicated solely to America's first responders and emergency personnel. Following the recommendation of the 9/11 Commission, the United States Congress established FirstNet to provide reliable public safety networks across the country and dedicated bandwidth for use by first responders. (See AT&T First Net Information Sheets attached as Exhibit 3). The goal was to prevent the pervasive communications failures that occurred during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. The federal government entered into an exclusive contract with AT&T to provide FirstNet services, and FirstNet is only available where AT&T has sufficient wireless coverage. On July 11, 2017, the Commonwealth of Virginia became the first state to opt into the FirstNet National Safety Broadband Network. Every U.S. state and territory has since opted in. The full importance and efficacy of FirstNet has been revealed by the recent COVID-19 crisis. During the nationwide emergency, FirstNet is ensuring that first responders have adequate communications free of commercial congestion. More than 11,000 agencies, including FEMA and the U.S. Coast Guard are using more than 1.2 million FirstNet connections during the COVID-19 crisis. See Ex. 3. FirstNet offers dedicated deployable assets to FirstNet subscribers to boost coverage where its needed, such as in remote areas or at field hospitals See Ex. 3). FirstNet is being extensively utilized by the U.S. Navy hospital ships operating in New York and Los Angeles. III. THE PROPOSED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY When AT&T has a need for coverage, it first seeks to co -locate antennas onto or within an existing structure. In accordance with Zoning Code § 165-204.19(A), AT&T has provided maps depicting the search area used in siting the proposed commercial telecommunications facility. (See Map of AT&T Search Area attached as Exhibit 4). AT&T's closest existing telecommunications facilities are located 7.5 miles to the west (in West Virginia), 5.4 miles to the northeast and 4.6 miles to the southeast. (See Ex. 4 at 1). There were no existing telecommunications facilities or structures over 75 feet which might be viable for co -location opportunities within AT&T's search ring. 36297050.6 04/06/2020 3 In order to meet the AT&T's coverage goals, AT&T conducted a search ring with a radius of approximately one mile. It was determined AT&T must place the proposed telecommunications facility within the search ring to fill the existing coverage gaps and optimize AT&T's coverage. Therefore, all existing structures outside of the mile radius search ring were ruled out. AT&T conducted a search for existing structures within the search ring for possible co -location opportunities. (See Ex. 4 . The area is mostly rural farm land with few businesses, and AT&T did not identify any building or structure over 75 feet in height. Therefore, there were no viable co -location opportunities within the search area. Additionally, AT&T conducted an "Antenna Structure Registration" search through the Federal Communication Commission and determined there were no existing commercial telecommunication towers within the one -mile search ring. The closest nearby telecommunications facility is owned by Shentel Communications, which is located 1.2 miles from the proposed site. That tower is already at capacity with no space for additional telecommunications equipment. The tower is only 105 feet tall. Even if AT&T was able to locate its equipment at 105 feet, AT&T's engineers have determined it would not meet AT&T's existing coverage needs. With no viable co -location opportunity, AT&T determined, and its investigation confirmed, that a new tower was required. AT&T determined that property at 141 Fairview Road in Gore, Virginia 22637 (the "Property") was viable from a technical perspective (i.e. radio frequency), a zoning perspective (i.e. permitted use in the RA district and compliant with all regulations), and from a land owner perspective (i.e. a land owner willing to lease space to AT&T). The proposed telecommunications facility consists of a 199' monopole within a 50' x 50' (2,500 sq. feet) equipment compound surrounded by a 6' chain link fence, topped with 12 inches of barbed wire as an anti -climbing device (the "Facility"). See Site Plan attached as Exhibit 51. The 199' tower consists of a 193' monopole topped by a 6' lightning rod (the "Proposed Tower"). The Proposed Tower will allow AT&T to locate its antennas at a RAD center of 188' and it will allow at least three future carriers to locate antennas at 178', 168' and 158' respectively. The height of the monopole will eliminate AT&T's current network deficiencies and provide the maximum utility for other commercial carriers to co -locate their equipment to fill existing coverage gaps in their own networks. The Facility will operate automatically and will not require any personnel or hours of attendance. It will operate twenty-four (24) hours a day, three hundred and sixty-five days a year. Maintenance personnel will visit the site occasionally for repairs or modifications to the Facility. The Facility will comply with all relevant standards set forth in the Zoning Code and other relevant regulations. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Facility will not change the character of development in the area, will not affect the use and enjoyment of surrounding properties, and is in accordance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. The Zoning Code permits telecommunications 36297050.6 04/06/2020 4 facilities in the RA (Rural Area) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit. See Zoning Code § 165-401.03. The properties immediately adjacent and surrounding the Property are all zoned RA. The Property is over 14 acres in size, allowing the Facility to be located in the center of the Property, well away from adjacent properties and existing roadways. The proposed site is ideal, because its location and the lack of natural barriers will fill AT&T's existing coverage gap with a single tower, and will likely also fill existing coverage gaps for other wireless providers. The Property is located in a rural area, that is surrounded by trees and rolling hills. As such, the proposed site will be screened by the existing landscape, and be made compatible with the setting, color, lighting, and topography of the area. Additionally, the Facility will be built within the existing tree line, and will be surrounded on all sides by mature trees, further limiting the visual impact on the surrounding area. (See Ex. 5 at C 1). AT&T's Proposed Tower will not hinder any further development on adjacent properties or impair the value of the surrounding land. Substantial evidence shows that cell towers do not affect property values. (See Richard A. Forsten, Wendie C. Stable and Olfunke O. Fagbami, Cell Phone Towers Do Not Affect Property Values American Bar Association Probate & Property, at 10-15 (May/June 2016) a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 6).' A number of studies and court cases have demonstrated that "cell towers have no appreciable effect on property values. . ." Id. at 15. In the study, AT&T examined property sales two years before and two years after a tower was erected. The overwhelming data demonstrated that the existence of the tower had no effect on the value of property sales, even where the tower was visible. Id. at 13-14. Many studies have demonstrated that proximity to a cell tower makes no measureable difference in property values.2 A study in Richmond, Virginia examined six towers and 140 properties, and concluded that "there was no consistent market evidence suggesting any negative impact upon improved residential properties exposed to such facilities ..." 3 A similar study of eleven separate cell phone tower sites in Virginia and Maryland compared properties where a tower was visible and properties where a tower was not Excerpt: pages 3-9 & 16-64 removed for convenience. 2 How Does the Proximity to a Cell Tower Impact Home Values?, Valbridge Property Advisors (Sept. 14, 2018), https://www.valbridge.com/news-article/647/how-does-the-proximity-to-a-cell-tower- impact-home-values. Thorne Consultants, Inc., Monopole Impact Study on Residential Lots in the Vicinity of the Bullis School Potomac, Montgomery County, Maryland (May 2, 2001), at 3. (Examining 111 transactions and determining that the proximity to a cell site had no effect on sales prices of homes or residential lots). Appraisal -Associates, Inc., Impact of a Telecommunications Tower upon Values of Residential Properties (Aug. 2005) ("The data demonstrates that residences in close proximity to a towers (less than one quarter mile or 2,000 feet in the case of the vast majority of the sales studied) did not incur a measurable diminution in value after development of the tower."). 3 Allen G. Dorin Jr., MAI, SAR & Joseph W. Smith III, The Impact of Communications Towers on Residential property Values, Right of Way, Mar./Apr. 1999, https://www.irwaonline.org/eweb/upload/0399b.pdf 36297050.6 04/06/2020 visible. The study found that homes appreciated at approximately the same rate, whether or not the tower was visible.4 The Facility will have no effect on the environment of Frederick County. Given the mature trees and rolling topography, its visual impact will be minimal. The tower will be unmanned, and will not generate any noise, light, or fumes. Because the Facility will be unmanned, there will be no need for any additional facilities or amenities to be included. There is an access roadway on the Property that will allow safe and adequate access to the Facility. The proposed access way will be 20 feet wide with an approved turn around for emergency vehicles. (See Ex. 5, Site Plan at Cl). AT&T's structural engineer has certified that the Facility will comply with all applicable local, state, and federal regulations. (See Engineering Certification Letter attached as Exhibit 7). V. COMPLIANCE WITH FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING CODE § 165-103.01. Consideration; approval or disapproval. A. Certain uses in each zoning district are listed as being allowed with a conditional use permit. Because of their particular nature, such uses must be separately considered to protect the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the County and to avoid adverse impacts on surrounding properties. • AT&T Response: The Facility will not impact the health, safety, or welfare of residents in Frederick County, Virginia. The Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") heavily regulates the strength of radio frequency ("RF") waves produced by telecommunications towers. The Facility will comply with all FCC regulations. (See RF Emissions Compliance Letter attached as Exhibit 8). The proposed tower will produce less than two percent of the levels allowed by the FCC. The Facility will pose no risk to the public and will not impact the health, safety, or welfare of residents of surrounding properties. B. The Board of Supervisors shall approve or disapprove, as a legislative function with recommendation from the Planning Commission, requests for conditional use permits. • AT&T Response: AT&T looks forward to public hearings with both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to clarify any information in this application. § 165-204.19 Telecommunications facilities, commercial. No commercial telecommunications facility shall be sited, constructed, or operated except pursuant to a conditional use permit issued through the process defined in Part 103 of Article 1 of this chapter. Commercial telecommunications facilities that locate on existing structures and towers shall be exempt from the conditional use permit requirement. The issuance of a conditional use permit for the siting, construction, and Thorn Consultants, Inc., Monopole, Lattice and Water Towers Studies, (2010). 36297050.6 04/06/2020 6 operation of a commercial telecommunications facility is permitted within the zoning districts specified in this chapter, provided that, pursuant to § 15.2-2232A of the Code of Virginia (1350, as amended), the general location or approximate location, character, and extent of such facilities are substantially in accord with the adopted Comprehensive Plan or part thereof and that adjoining properties, surrounding residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value are not negatively impacted. A. Information required as part of the conditional use permit application and that the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors may consider in acting on the application shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (1) Information regarding the need for the facility, including but not necessarily limited to usage statistics, operational data, and maps and reports showing current and anticipated radio frequency propagation. AT&T Response: AT&T has submitted an RF Justification statement describing the area where there is presently deficient wireless service. See Ex. 1). Given recent changes in the Virginia Code (Va. Code § 15.2-2316.4), County Staff requested that AT&T not submit any radio frequency propagation maps. However, there is a dearth of telecommunications facilities near the property and a severe lack of wireless coverage, which AT&T is attempting to address. (2) A map depicting the search area used in siting the proposed commercial communications facility. • AT&T Response: AT&T has submitted its map depicting the search area used in siting the proposed Facility. (See Ex. 4. Map of AT&T Search Area). (3) Identification of all service providers and commercial telecommunications facility infrastructure within a search area. The applicant shall provide confirmation that attempts to co -locate on existing structures or towers have been made and, if such attempts were unsuccessful, the reasons so. AT&T Response: AT&T's search ring was approximately a mile radius. There is no existing telecommunications infrastructure within AT&T's search ring. The closest telecommunications tower is 1.2 miles from the Property, a 105' tower built by SBA Towers and currently owned and operated by Shentel Communications. The tower is already at capacity for wireless infrastructure. Even if there was available space, AT&T's RF engineers have determined that the tower is of insufficient height (likely RAD center at 80') to address AT&T's existing coverage gap. AT&T was unable to locate any other structures over 75 feet within the search area for co -location opportunities. (See Ex. 4, Map of AT&T Search Area). 36297050.6 04/06/2020 7 (4) Documentation issued by the Federal Communications Commission indicating that the proposed commercial telecommunications facility is in compliance with the Federal Communications Commissions established ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation. • AT&T Response: A radio frequency engineer has certified AT&T's compliance with all Federal Communications Commission ANSI/EEE Standards. See Ex. 8 RF Emissions Compliance Letter). (5) An affidavit signed by the landowner and by the owner of the facility stating that they are aware that either or both of them may be held responsible for the removal of the commercial telecommunications facility as stated in § 165-204.19B(7). AT&T Response: AT&T and the landowner agree that they each may be held responsible for the removal of the commercial telecommunications facility. See Affidavit of Tower Removal attached as Exhibit 9). B. If the Board of Supervisors grants a conditional use permit under this section, the following standards shall then apply to any property in which a commercial telecommunications facility is sited, in order to promote orderly development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties, residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant historic value: (1) The Board of Supervisors may reduce the required setback distance for commercial telecommunications facilities as required by § 165- 201.03B(8) of this chapter if it can be demonstrated that the location is of equal or lesser impact. When a reduced setback is requested for a distance less than the height of the tower, a certified Virginia engineer shall provide verification to the Board of Supervisors that the tower is designed, and will be constructed, in a manner that if the tower collapses for any reason the collapsed tower will be contained in an area around the tower with a radius equal to or lesser than the setback, measured from the center line of the base of the tower. In no case shall the setback distance be reduced to less than 1/2 the distance of the tower height. Commercial telecommunications facilities affixed to existing structures shall be exempt from setback requirements, provided that they are located no closer to the adjoining property line than the existing structure. AT&T Response: AT&T's Proposed Tower will have setback distances of 225' to the north, 450' to the east, 239' to the south, and 170' to the west. See Ex. 5 Site Plans at C1). Therefore, AT&T is requesting one reduced setback of approximately 30 feet from 200 feet to 170 feet to the west. AT&T chose the location on the Property due to existing mature trees and forest on the Property. By reducing the setback to the west, AT&T was able to locate the Facility in the 36297050.6 04/06/2020 middle of these mature trees maximizing screening from surrounding properties and roads. If the tower was moved 30 feet to the east to meet the required setback, the screening by existing trees would be greatly reduced increasing the potential visual impact. AT&T's engineer confirmed that, in the unlikely event of a tower collapse, the tower will fall within a radius of 100 feet, well short of any existing property line. (See Ex. 7, Engineering Certification Letter ). Therefore, the reduction in setback will not create a hazard to any surrounding property or structure. (2) Monopole -type construction shall be required for new commercial telecommunications towers. The Board of Supervisors may allow lattice - type construction for new telecommunications towers when existing or planned residential areas will not be impacted and when the site is not adjacent to identified historical resources. AT&T Response: The Proposed Tower will be a monopole -type construction. (See Ex. 5, Site Plans, at C2). (3) Advertising shall be prohibited on commercial telecommunications facilities except for signage providing ownership identification and emergency information. No more than two signs shall be permitted. Such signs shall be limited to 1.5 square feet in area and shall be posted no higher than 10 feet above grade. AT&T Response: There will be no signs or advertising on the Facility other than permitted by this paragraph. (4) When lighting is required on commercial telecommunications facility towers, dual lighting shall be utilized which provides daytime white strobe lighting and nighttime red pulsating lighting unless otherwise mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Federal Communications Commission. Strobe lighting shall be shielded from ground view to mitigate illumination to neighboring properties. Equipment buildings and other accessory structures operated in conjunction with commercial telecommunications facility towers shall utilize infrared lighting and motion -detector lighting to prevent continuous illumination. AT&T Response: The Proposed Tower will not have any lighting unless required by the FAA or as provided as a condition of approval by the Board of Supervisors. Generally, the FAA does not require any lighting or illumination for towers under 200 feet in height. If lighting is required, that lighting will be in accordance with FAA regulations and this paragraph. (5) Commercial telecommunications facilities shall be constructed with materials of a galvanized finish or painted a non -contrasting blue or gray 36297050.6 04/06/2020 unless otherwise mandated by the Federal Aviation Administration or the Federal Communications Commission. • AT&T Response: The Proposed Tower will be of a galvanized, gray finish. See Ex. 5, Site Plans at C 1 & C2). (6) Commercial telecommunications facilities shall be adequately enclosed to prevent access by persons other than employees of the service provider. Appropriate landscaping and opaque screening shall be provided to ensure that equipment buildings and other accessory structures are not visible from adjoining properties, roads or other rights-of-way. • AT&T Response: All associated equipment at the Facility will be enclosed within a 50' x 50' compound area surrounded by a 6' tall chain link fence with anti -climbing devices. The Facility will be screened by a significant number of existing mature trees. AT&T will also add landscaping and native trees and shrubs around the Facility to aid in screening. The Proposed Tower will be of a galvanized, gray finish. Other buildings and accessory structures will not be visible from adjoining properties, roadways, or other rights-of-way. (See Ex. 5, Site Plans at Cl & C2). (7) Any antenna or tower that is not operated for a continuous period of 12 months shall be considered abandoned, and the owner of such tower shall remove same within 90 days of receipt of notice from the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. Removal includes the removal of the tower, all tower and fence footers, underground cables and support buildings. If there are two or more users of a single tower, then this provision shall not become effective until all users cease using the tower. If the tower is not removed within the ninety -day period, the County will remove the facility and a lien may be placed to recover expenses. • AT&T Response: AT&T and the Property owner acknowledge this provision and affirmatively state that if the Proposed Tower is not used for a continuous period of 12 months it will be removed along with all associated equipment and fencing. (See Ex. -9,. -Affidavit of Tower Removal). C. "Existing structure or tower," for purposes of this section, shall mean any man- made object having an ascertainable stationary location on or in land or water, whether or not it is affixed to the ground, which object is at least 50% of the height of the proposed commercial telecommunications facility. • AT&T Response: AT&T acknowledges this definition. 36297050.6 04/06/2020 10 VI. HISTORIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AT&T contracted with a third party environmental engineering consultant to analyze the Property, the Facility, and the surrounding areas and complete the required FCC environmental compliance report identifying the impact on environmental resources, prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 ("NEPA"). A copy of the final NEPA report by ACER Associates, LLC, dated August 12, 2019, is attached as Exhibit 10. The NEPA report determined no relevant environmental or historical effects. Specifically, there was a finding of no historical properties in the area. (See Ex. 10, Attachment 7 at 76). Additionally, the location "does not contain an archaeological site" and the project "will have no effect on archaeological resources..." (See Ex. 10, Attachment -7 -At -83). Acer received a response from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurring with its findings. (See Ex. 10, Section E at 109). The NEPA report further indicates that there will be no effect on dedicated wilderness areas or designated wildlife preserves, and "the project `is not likely to impact any wilderness areas or wildlife preserves."' (See Ex. 10, Section G at 144). Acer further concluded the project is "`not likely to adversely affect any threatened or endangered species."' (See Ex. 10, Section H at 146-47). VIL REVIEW BY PERTINENT COUNTY AGENCIES Pursuant to Code § 165-102.02, and the conditional use requirements set forth by the Frederick County Office of Planning and Development, AT&T submitted its application materials to various agencies for review. The agency comment sheets are attached hereto as Exhibit 11. The Virginia Department of Transportation stated that the proposed Facility will "have little measureable impact on Route 733 (Fairview Road)..." The VDOT stated that the "new entrance will need to meet VDOT standards for the proposed use." AT&T will comply with all VDOT standards. The Frederick County Fire Marshal disapproved of the plan due to inadequate fire lane access and the need for an approved turn around for fire department vehicles for a lane greater than 150' in length. AT&T amended its site plans for the proposed Facility to satisfy these requirements. (See Ex. 5, Site Plan at C1). Pursuant to the Frederick County Fire Prevention and Protection code § 90-4B(2), the proposed access way was expanded from 10' wide to 20' wide. (See Ex. 5, Site Plan at C 1). Pursuant to the 2015 Statewide Fire Prevention Code, Appendix D, AT&T has added an approved turn -around for any fire department vehicles. (See Ex. 5, Site Plan at C1). The Frederick County Inspections Department stated that the Facility must comply with the Virginia Building Code and the tower must be designed in accordance with the provisions of the TIA-222. AT&T will comply with all applicable building codes and other requirements, including those cited by the Inspections Department. 36297050.6 04/06/2020 11 The Winchester -Frederick County Health Department had no comments because the Facility is unmanned. Frederick Water said that the parcel is outside of the Severe Water Service Area, and had no comments. The City of Winchester declined to submit a comment sheet because the parcel is located outside of the Winchester city limits. The Winchester Regional Airport had no comments. The Historic Resource Advisory Board stated that "the proposal does not significantly impact historic resources and it is not necessary to schedule a formal review of the application by the HRAB." VIII. CONCLUSION AT&T respectfully requests that Frederick County grant the requested Conditional Use Permit. If you need further information, please contact our zoning attorney Douglas Sampson at 410-332-8661 or douglas.sampson@saul.com. 36297050.6 04/06/2020 12 EXHIBIT 1 i - at&t RF Justification Site Name: FROG EYE SIRBAUGH Address: 141 Fairview Road, Gore VA 22637 (Frederick County) The main objective of this site is to add and enhance AT&T coverage along Route 50, SR -707, SR -610, SR -703, SR -259 and the surrounding areas in Gore VA. The addition of this site will improve coverage including in -building coverage in the commercial and residential areas along Fairview Road, Fletcher Road and Maple Hills Drive. Currently, this area has weak AT&T coverage. The Proposed site will also ensure overlap coverage, handoffs and off-load traffic among existing AT&T Sites Cross Junction and Wild Acres, Commuters and residents will experience better quality of voice and data services from AT&T with the addition of Coldbrook site. AT&T is proposing for 190' Rad Center for this site to meet its coverage and capacity needs. Prepared by: X f Gaurav Behl RF Engineer Approved by: Sandeep Gupta RF Design Manager AT&T Mobility 7150 Standard Drive Hanover, MD Tel: 410-712-7817 Fax: 410-712-7784 EXHIBIT 2 AT&T Remains Focused on Keeping You Connected As people are doing their best to self -isolate, AT&T's network is keeping people connected. In the last three weeks of March, here's what we've seen on our mobile network alone.- Despite lone: How businesses and schools are communicating has steadily increased the usage of conferencing tools, which are at an all-time high. Here's what we've seen over the last few weeks of March: Despite these dramatic shifts in traffic patterns, our network continues to perform well. AT&T invested more than $135 billion in our wireless and wireline networks over the past 5 years (2015-2019).' During this time, we invested more in the U.S. than any other public company, and it has paid off. We're able to respond rapidly to surges in traffic and help meet the quickly evolving needs of our customers. When we see stress, we are proactively augmenting where needed. Additionally, we're actively using All to: • Reset our 4G and 5G cell sites: When cell site issues are detected, we have an automated process to collect data, analyze and reset the site. Al is also helping us conserve energy, by "waking up" some cells more frequently as traffic increases, while others, such as in office parks and buildings that are less occupied now, go to sleep more. • Detect customer equipment issues: Al is also helping us remotely troubleshoot and diagnose problems with customer equipment, by identifying the cause or even proactively identifying a potential issue before it occurs. • Avoid network traffic congestion: We've expedited deployments of new Al capabilities in certain markets that will allow us to balance the traffic load within a sector and across sectors to help avoid overloading specific cells and improve the experience. 1 includes U.S. and international capital investment and acquisitions of wireless operations and spectrum AT&T And of course, we're doing other things to support more people working and learning from home, such as adding additional spectrum (capacity) to cell sites to improve customers' experience. The U.S's wireless performance is due in no small measure to its longstanding recognition that a light touch approach to regulation promotes competition, innovation and investment. It's one that often rpcnnnl7Ps new technnlnniPq arP trancfnrming ni it cn`ir`tiec and ecnnomi c l to h l h much faster than regulation, enabling the U.S. to be a global leader in technology. Consistent with FCC Chairman Pai's "Keep Americans Connected Pledge" and concerns raised by members of Congress, which we share, AT&T is also proud to support our customers by pledging that, for 60 days, we will: P11 Not terminate the service of any wireless, home phone or broadband residential or small business customer because of their inability to pay their bill due to disruptions caused by the coronavirus pandemic. Waive* any late payment fees that any wireless, home phone or broadband residential or e small business customer may incur because of economic hardship related to the coronavirus pandemic. Waive domestic wireless plan overage charges for data, voice or text for residential or small business wireless customers incurred because of economic hardship related to the coronavirus pandemic - 0 Keep our public Wi-Fi hotspots open for any American who needs them. To provide further relief and support, AT&T announced: • Unlimited AT&T Home Internet —All AT&T consumer home internet wireline customers, as well as Fixed Wireless Internet, can use unlimited internet data. • More Mobile Hotspot Data —We are automatically increasing mobile hotspot data by 15GB a month for each line on an unlimited plan that currently includes a monthly tethering allotment. That means if you're on AT&T Unlimited Elite you'll automatically get 45GB a month of tethering per line. • Added Prepaid Offers —A limited time offer of $15 for 2GB of data with unlimited talk and text will be available to new and existing customers with no activation fee for AT&T PREPAID and Cricket customers. We're also adding 10GB per month of additional data. • Helping You Learn Remotely —We're also offering schools away to save on unlimited wireless broadband connectivity for students. Through May 22nd, qualified schools activating new lines on qualified data -only plans for school -issued tablets, 4G LTE -enabled laptops and hotspot devices will get the wireless data service at no cost for 60 days. We're committed to being there when our customers and colleagues need us most. Visit AT&T's dedicated COVID-19 website for additional details and the latest updates. <jeo N K Imoll. ! � ;,e'tv it g .^-.",� e . AUT —,vle h Ita� a� _ .,'ns r - ieMa� u. =. -_e m—, - Sial isu.11 . .:<:I ..,.rr,i t „ Frd ib _, ;.� , ` ' AT&T EXHIBIT 3 FIRSTNET: SUPPORTING FIRST RESPONDERS DURING THE COVID-19 OUTBREAK ALREADY, THE IMPACTS OF FIRSTNET HAVE BEEN REAL, TANGIBLE AND, LIFESAVING. The COVID-19 health crisis illustrates precisely why public safety fought for the creation of FirstNet. Reliable connectivity and advanced capabilities for first responders helps them keep themselves and those they serve safer. As men and women across the country stand on the front lines to support our nation's response to COVID-19, they know, with confidence, FirstNet delivers the unthrottled connectivity and priority communications they need to respond during this public health emergency. More than 11,000 agencies and organizations — including FEMA and U.S. Coast Guard to name a few — are using over 1.2 million FirstNet connections to respond to real life emergencies and disasters every day. In 2012, Congress created the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet Authority) and authorized it to build, operate, and maintain FirstNet, a single, nationwide broadband network in response to the communication failures that occurred during the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Today, the FirstNet network is working as Congress intended and public safety needs. The dedicated communications platform supports public safety, health care workers, and those who support them during their daily operations and during disasters, including pandemics and public health emergencies. As police, fire, EMS, public health, emergency management and military personnel work around the clock to assess and mitigate the COVID-19 spread across the nation, the FirstNet° communications platform — built and operated by AT&T in a public-private partnership with FirstNet Authority — is bringing advanced capabilities to first responders across the country. NETWORK STATUS Since the onset of the outbreak, FirstNet has continued to be nimble, adaptable and ready to scale. We are continuously deploying additional assets and adding capacity to our network. We are seeing public safety, healthcare institutions, and health departments take advantage of our purpose-built network during this unprecedented public health emergency and witnessing as eligible subscribers, seeing the benefits of firsthand, migrate to FirstNet. Performance for first responders on our FirstNet network has been excellent. Priority and preemption on Band 14 spectrum — the nationwide, high-quality spectrum set aside by the U.S. government specifically for FirstNet — is working as intended and first responders are free of any commercial congestion. As of April 2, 2020, we have responded to 31 requests from FirstNet subscribed agencies for network support for COVID-19, and we currently have 15 portable cell sites and other solutions deployed to bolster coverage for our FirstNet subscribers at quarantine locations, testing sites and field hospitals, including deploying a cell tower on wheels to support the Naval Ship Mercy in Los Angeles. eZOZo AT&T Intellectual Property. FIRSTNET FirstNet, First Responder Network Authority, and FirstNet logo are registered trademarks and service marks of FirstNet, �� an independent authority within the U.S. Department of Commerce. All other marks are the property of their respective owners. , &A dt 9Y7 h AT&T FIRSTNET'S DEDICATED FLEET OF PORTABLE ASSETS . Public safety agencies on FirstNet have access to a nationwide, dedicated fleet of 76 land-based and airborne portable cell sites, including 3 Flying COWST" and the FirstNet One "blimp." Stationed across the country, these dedicated FirstNet network deployable assets are available 24/7 at the request of and free of charge to FirstNet subscribers to boost coverage, such as at field hospitals in remote areas that may have limited connectivity. So far, we've deployed assets, optimized the network or expedited the provisioning of FirstNet ReadyT"^ devices to support quarantine zones, airports, emergency operation centers (EOGs) and other priority public safety locations across the country. Now, we are making new & advanced capabilities available to first responders nationwide: First responder public safety agencies on FirstNet can get premium FirstNet ReadyT"' smartphone devices for free for their agency paid users to connect them to critical communications when and where they need it most. Developed from the ground up specifically for and with public safety, FirstNet Push -to -Talk is designed to enable public safety to use their smartphones, feature phones, and 2 specialized ultra -rugged devices like they would use a two-way radio, with highly reliable, high-performance calling. FirstNet Push -to -Talk is the first-ever nationwide mission -critical standards-based push -to -talk solution to launch in the U.S. FIRSTNET TECHNICAL SUPPORT Public safety agency and individual first responders, including police, fire, EMS, health care professionals, emergency management, and military personnel can sign-up for service or order devices online: https://www.firstnet.com/signup/. FirstNet subscribers seeking to request FirstNet support can call 1-800-574-7000. Visit firstnet.com for additional details. 020Z0 AT&T Intellectual Property_ FirstNet, First Responder Network Authority, and FirstNet logo are registered trademarks and service marks of FirstNet, FIRSTRIET. an independent authority within the U.S. Department of Commerce_ All other marks are the property of their respective owners. �� Butt with AT&T V4OA + mpreviTtOmmunications through an interoperable network Today,first responders rely on more than 10,000 separate, incompatible, and often proprietary Iadio networks to communicate with each other during emergencies. Sometimes it's hard, or even "tt, mpossible, for public safety to communicate and work together to save lives. To help address this hallenge, the FirstNet network will be a single, nationwide, interoperable LTE network dedicated o public safety communications. ;TA 2. Connecting responders in rural America Emergencies don't happen only in highly populated areas — which is why reaching rural Amer is one of FirstNet's top priorities. FirstNet is addressing rural coverage needs in multiple ways deploy the network in places where coverage may be difficult. High-power towers can cover mi rural space with less total infrastructure, as can deployable and satellite solutions. 4. wing public safety true priority During emergencies, public safety needs to be able to communicate without interruption — lives depend on it. It is vital that our nation's law enforcement officers, firefighters, paramedics, and other responders have true priority for their daily and emergency communications needs. This is why FirstNet is deploying a wireless broadband network dedicated to public safety. 5.Offering vital capacity for planned events, large crowds Emergencies aren't the only times when public safety needs capacity to communicate and send data. Planned events — like concerts, festivals, and sporting events — draw crowds to a single location, making it difficult for public safety to get the robust network capacity they need to do their jobs. That's where FirstNet will help, by providing needed bandwidth to coordinate )IJ blic safety resources . Benv g -actNible data via innovative apps, devices Public safety needs data communications in the field and innovative public safety communications technology. That's why the FirstNet network is designed to deliver applications, devices, and services tailored to the needs of public safety. FirstNet will be a resilient, reliable network, enabling everything from smartphones to laptops, tablets, dongles, and specialty devices to work when public safety needs them the most. . Providing reliability and security when disaster strikes Frst responders in every state face the challenge of preparing for and responding to natural disasters. Having reliable communications is an integral component of any plan or response effort. FirstNet can help public safety save lives and secure communities by ensuring a reliable communication system is in place to assist public safety and rescue crews before, during, and after a natural disaster. 9. Driving innovation in life 1.Communications technology With the potential for millions of users on a single LTE network, FirstNet hopes to foster creation of a new ecosystem in which entities compete to deliver applications and other services through the FirstNet network. The nationwide scale brought by FirstNet will maximize the value of every public safety dollar spent by allowing public safety end-users to take advantage of an increasingly competitive marketplace. It The network first responders need to keep our communities safe FirstNet is taking a "for public safety, by public safety" approach to planning and deploying the network. Through its consultation and outreach program, FirstNet has worked hand-in-hand with the public safety community to understand the capacity, coverage, service, and other public -safety - grade features they need to communicate and use 21st -century tools on the job. EXHIBIT 4 ISSUED DATE_ _ SITE ACQUISITION 5/31/2018 REQUEST• ' MENS APPROM DAF t J ISSUED BY _ Gaurav Behl _ TRIDENT APPROVAL DATE APPROVED BY Sandeep Gupta PEFORMANCE MANAGER Andres Gomez SITE ACQUIS71ON COMPANY Smartlink DESIGN MANAGER Sandeep Gupta SITE ID (COMMON ID) 4124 _ DESIGN ENGINEER Gaurav Behl SEARCH RING ID �EGION _ IMARKETCLUSTER MARKET_ SUBMARKET `_ 4124 No Washington DC/ Maryland SEARCH RING NAME FROG EYE SIRBAUGH 2 GORE Frederick LOCATION COIN_MON NAME E911 PHASE CITY COUNTY i� _ (POLYGON CLUSTER SITE PRIORITY 1 -High CASPR PROJECT 41 _ FREQUENCY BAND 850/1900/700/AWS F7 D ASSET # _ 10138153 _ TECHNOLOGY LTE ER= C l LOCATION SHORT DESCRiNi-ON_ PASTE/INSERT SEARCH SEARCH RING Route 50 and SR 733 S CT OBJECTIVE -� RING MAP HERE PARAMETERS B -COV LATITUDE (N) (DD-MM-SS.S)� 39-17-4 LATITUDE DECIMAL (N) 39.284485 LONGITUDE (W) (DDD-MM-SS.S)� 78-23-5 LONGITUDE DECIMAL (W) -78.384773 GROUND ELEVATION AMSL (FEET) 1120 SEARCH RING RADIUS (miles) 0.7 UIRED HEIGHT - MAX AGL (FEET) 180 (FEET) _ OVERALL TOTAL HEIGHT -MAX AMS'L 1320 ., �REQUIIREDHEIGHT- MIN AGL (FEET) 200 (FEET) COVERAGEOBJECTIVE OVERALL TOTAL HEIGHT - MIN AMSI.� 1300 extend coverage in Freerick County along Route 50, SR 733 , 707, 610 and 703 there an available Crown or ATC. candidate within i.5 times the radius of the center of the search ring? If yes, include in rssible candidate 1 rssible candidate 2 _ rssible candidate 3 ."e candidate 4 _ bsible cand.aata .- submit candidates within the red polygon shown above 0i lal ArUNCTION dM BOAR flv. rc., 0.fcMEYLESIRS'H PER fAOUNTA;'N-:7.: —SPA -4 E CRSEK -1 d Q .7, LAX ep LLEGqfM Ruler: 4.684 Iles 141 rview Rd, Gore VA c, o ri e -11 (� ( G " F f3 _PROJECT SITE INFORMATION LOCATION MAP SITE NAME: FROG EYE SIRBAUGH APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT SITE In. RRRE .��i 1IRs ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHA1L BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS SITE NAME ice- d 11Re811Cpm a+wWNer, belyw.9 �aAe.a�.�..e eCellbakre ou dl. x FROG EYE SIRB AUGH w E=CI MANAGEMENT:2015 LLC at&t FA SITE NUMBER 10138153 Z o6 z w d Lu wx zzw FREDERICK • 2015 NATIONAL FlRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 101 SITE ID 4124 —w� 6865 DEERPATH ROAD STE 152 ZONING, SITE ADDRESS AR51 EIA/Tl0. 222 REV, G PIN --A: 26 A 29 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD GORE VA 22637 m 18 0012690 GR -1275 • ANSI T1.311 PROPERry AREA; 14.3% ACRES _PROJECT SITE INFORMATION LOCATION MAP SITE NAME: FROG EYE SIRBAUGH APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT SITE In. 4124 ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHA1L BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS FA SITE A 10138153 PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION SITE ADORES, 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD 2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NFPA 70) E=CI MANAGEMENT:2015 LLC GORE VA 22637 1362 MELL 1362 MELLON ROAD JURISDICTION' FREDERICK • 2015 NATIONAL FlRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 101 MAGIS RIA DI TRI T GAINESBORO 6865 DEERPATH ROAD STE 152 ZONING, RA AR51 EIA/Tl0. 222 REV, G PIN --A: 26 A 29 7150 STANDARD DRIVE INSTRUMENT A' 18 0012690 GR -1275 • ANSI T1.311 PROPERry AREA; 14.3% ACRES SITE COORDINATES LATITUDE, N 39' 17' 04.35' (NAD 83) LONGITUDE W 78' 23' 05.06' (NAD 83) GROUND VATICN� 1100.53 FEET AMSL (NAVD 88) TOP OF HIGHEST APPURTENANCE, 199'-0'3 (LIGHTNING ROD) (AOL) PARCE OWN & HOTT EMMA J ETALS 141 FAIRVWE ROAD GORE, VA 22637 APPLICANT, AT&T MOBILITY 7150 STANDARD DRIVE HANOVER, MD 21076 NO" ,•`.� PROJECT SITE FROGS IR8AMGH riuw+e+<. w.e TITLE PAGE NOTES COMPOUND PLAN AND ELEVATION RF SCHEDULE AND NOTES ANTENNA AND RRH MOUNTING DETAILS RF PLUMBING DIAGRAM EQUIPMENT DETAILS EQUIPMENT DETAILS GENSET DETAILS DCS WIRING DIAGRAM CIVIL DETAILS FENCE DETAILS ELECTRICAL DETAILS DC POWER DETAILS RRH WIRING DIAGRAM UTILITY PLAN GROUNDING PLAN GROUNDING DETAILS APPROVALS APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT CODE COMPLIANCE DATE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHA1L BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED WITH ANY LOCAL AMENDMENTS BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTNORITES. PROJECT TEAM INFORMATION 2015 VIRGINIA UNIFORM STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE (VUSBC) DATE 2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NFPA 70) E=CI MANAGEMENT:2015 LLC INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE . 2015 INTERNATIONAL PLUMBING CODE 1362 MELL 1362 MELLON ROAD • 2015 INTERNATIONAL FUEL CAS CODE HANOVER, MD 21076 • 2015 NATIONAL FlRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 101 ENGINEER , INRNIGY SOLUTIONS 2015 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION 1 6865 DEERPATH ROAD STE 152 AMERICAN INSTIME OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATIONS (NSC) UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES APPROVED ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS. ELKRIDGE, MD 21075 (518) 690-0790 AR51 EIA/Tl0. 222 REV, G APPLICANT AT&T MOBILITY • TW 607 INSTITUTE FOR ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS 81 7150 STANDARD DRIVE • IEEE )C LATEST EDITION) • TELCO HANOVER, MD 21076 GR -1275 • ANSI T1.311 TITLE PAGE NOTES COMPOUND PLAN AND ELEVATION RF SCHEDULE AND NOTES ANTENNA AND RRH MOUNTING DETAILS RF PLUMBING DIAGRAM EQUIPMENT DETAILS EQUIPMENT DETAILS GENSET DETAILS DCS WIRING DIAGRAM CIVIL DETAILS FENCE DETAILS ELECTRICAL DETAILS DC POWER DETAILS RRH WIRING DIAGRAM UTILITY PLAN GROUNDING PLAN GROUNDING DETAILS APPROVALS X SEPH R JOHN Lie. No. 040205 03/04/2020 IG EYE SIRBAM SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FARVIEW ROAp GORE. VA;3637 C RM E in TITLE PAGE T1 APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT OWNER REP DATE C3 ❑ ❑ APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT SITE ACO DATE ❑ ❑ ❑ APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REUSE & RESUBMIT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DAA C) ❑ ❑ APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT ZONING DATE C) ❑ ❑ APPROVED APPROVED AS NOTED REVISE & RESUBMIT C] RF ENGINEER DATE ❑ ❑ X SEPH R JOHN Lie. No. 040205 03/04/2020 IG EYE SIRBAM SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FARVIEW ROAp GORE. VA;3637 C RM E in TITLE PAGE T1 SITE WORK NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF WORK, 2. ALL EXISTING ACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS', ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES, AND WHERE REQUIRED FOR THE PROPER EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BERELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUTION SHOULD BE USED BY THE SUBCONTRACTOR WHEN EXCAVATING OR DRILLING PIERS AROUND OR NEAR UTILITIES. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY TRAINING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B) CONFINED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY 0) TRENCHING & EXCAVATION. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS SHALL BE PROVIDED SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS TRAINING. 3. ALL SITE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS, 4. MPS, IF NECESSARY, RUBBISH, STUDEBRIS, STICKS, STONES AND OTHER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY. 5. ALL EXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER UTILITIES, WHICH INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED ANO/OR CAPPED, PLUGGED OR OTHERWISE DISCONTINUED AT POINTS WHICH WILL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE EXECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION. 6. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION AND NOT EXCEEDING THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE AS IDENTIFIED ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWING AND ASSURING THAT SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL IS PROPERLY MAINTAINED, 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SITE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR SITE SIGNAGE. 8. THE SITE SHALL BE GRADED TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE EQUIPMENT, TOWER AREAS AND INTO NATURAL DRAINAGE WAYS. 9. NO FILL OR EMBANKMENT MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERIALS, SNOW OR ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FILL OR EMBANKMENT, 10, THE SUB GRADE SHALL BE COMPACTED AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FINISHED SURFACE APPLICATION. 11. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER, EQUIPMENT OR DRNEWAY. SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE, AND STABILIZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS SPECIFIED IN THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO EXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDELINES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL. GENERAL NOTES I. FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWING, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: ENGINEER - INFINIGY CONTRACTOR - GENERAL CONTRACTOR (CONSTRUCTION) OWNER - AT&T OEM - ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURER 2. PRIOR TOTHE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO FAMILIARIZE WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TO CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF CONTRACTOR, 3. ALL MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES AND COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES. RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. GENERAL NOTES CONTINUED 4, ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. & DRAWINGS PROVIDED HERE ARE NOT TO SCALE AND ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY, B. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE. 8. IF THE SPECIFIED EQUIPMENT CANNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS, THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROPOSE AN ALTERNATIVE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE CONTRACTOR. 9. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTING OF CONDUIT, POWER AND T1 CABLES, GROUNDING CABLES AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING AND TELCO PLAN DRAWING, SUBCONTRACTOR SHALT. ORAIN FIELD APPROVAL BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDCTION FOR ANY DEVIATION FOR SHOWN ROUTES FOR ANY UTILITY. 10. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES. ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF OWNER, SUBSTITUTIONS OF ANY EQUIPMENT AND MATERIALS REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, 11. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERIALS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES AND OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACIUTY. ANTENNAS REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S DESIGNATED LOCATION. 12. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN A CLEAR CONDITION ON A DAILY BASIS, 13. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF SPECIFICATIONS UNDER "GENERAL CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF AT&T SITES.' 14. WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS OR SPECIFICATIONS ARE IN CONFLICT WITH ANY REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT ISSUED BY THE LOCAL AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION, THE PERMIT SHALL HAVE PRIMARY AUTHORITY. STRUCTURAL STEEL NOTES: I. ALL STEEL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LATEST EDITION OF AISC STEEL CONSTRUCTION MANUAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION PER ASTM A123. 3. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL TO MEET ASTM A36 SPECIFICATIONS. 4. ALL WELDING SHALL BE PERFORMED USING E70XX ELECTRODES AND WELDING SHALL CONFORM TO RISC. SURFACES TO BE WELDED TO SHALL BE CLEANED AND PREPARED PER AWS STANDARD PRACTICE. WHERE FILLET WELD SIZES ARE NOT SHOWN, PROVIDE THE MINIMUM SIZE PER TABLE J2.4 IN THE AISC "MANUAL OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION'. PAINTED SURFACES SHALL BE TOUCHED UP. 5. DAMAGED GALVANIZED SURFACES TO BE REPAIRED PER ASTM A780. 6. BOLTED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE ASTM A325 BEARING TYPE (3/4"0) CONNECTIONS AND SHALL HAVE MINIMUM OF TWO BOLTS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, BOLTS AND HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED PER ASTM A153. ALL HOLES IN STRUCTURAL STEEL TO BE RISC STANDARD SIZE (BOLT ¢+Ne') UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, SOIL COMPACTION NOTES: 1. EXCAVATE AS REQUIRED TO REMOVE VEGETATION & TOPSOIL EXPOSE UNDISTURBED NATURAL SUBGRADE AND. PLACE CRUSHED STONE AS REQUIRED. 2. COMPACTION CERTIFICATION: AN INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION BY A QUALIFIED GEOTECHNICAL TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER IS ACCEPTABLE. 3. AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INSPECTION AND WRITTEN CERTIFICATION, THE 'UNDISTURBED SOIL' BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED WITH "COMPACTION EQUIPMENT', LISTED BELOW, TO AT LEAST 957, MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 METHOD C. 4, COMPACTED SUB BASE SHALL BE UNIFORM & LEVELED. PROVIDE 6" MINIMUM CRUSHED STONE OR GRAVEL COMPACTED IN 3" LIFTS ABOVE COMPACTED SOIL. GRAVEL SHALL BE NATURAL OR CRUSHED WITH 10OX PASSING 1" SIEVE. 5. MINIMUM SOIL BEARING 2000 PSF OR AS NOTED. COMPACTION EQUIPMENT: HAND OPERATED DOUBLE DRUM, VIBRATORY ROLLER, VIBRATORY PLATE COMPACTOR OR JUMPING JACK COMPACTOR. CONCRETE AND REINFORCING STEEL NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ACI 301, ACI 318, ACI 336, ASTM A184, ASTM A185 AND THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION SPECIFICATION FOR CAST -IN-PLACE CONCRETE, 2. ALL CONCRETE SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 4000 PSI AT 26 DAYS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. . 3. REINFORCING STEEL SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 615, GRADE 60, DEFORMED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. WELDED WIRE FABRIC SHALL CONFORM TO ASTM A 1195 WELDED STEEL WIRE FABRIC UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SPLICES SHALL BE CLASS 'BIT AND ALL HOOKS SHALL BE STANDARD, UNO, 4. THE FOLLOWING MINIMUM CONCRETE COVER SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR REINFORCING STEEL UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE ON DRAWINGS: CONCRETE CAST AGAINST EARTH........3 IN, CONCRETE EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER: r(�5AND LARGER .......................... 2 IN, AND SMALLER & WWF _1 1/2 IN. CONCRETE NOT EXPOSED TO EARTH OR WEATHER OR NOT CAST AGAINST THE GROUND: SLAB AND WALL ........................3/4 IN. BEAMS AND COLUMNS .............. 1 1/2 IN. 5. A CHAMFER OF 3/4" SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL EXPOSED EDGES OF CONCRETE, UNG, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACI 301 SECTION 4.2.4, 6. INSTALLATION OF CONCRETE EXPANSION/WEDOE ANCHOR, SHALL BE PER MANUFACTURER'S WRITTEN RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE. THE ANCHOR BOLT, DOWEL OR ROD SHALL CONFORM TO MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATION FOR EMBEDMENT DEPTH OR AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. NO REBAR SHALL BE CUT WITHOUT PRIOR CONTRACTOR APPROVAL WHEN DRILLING HOLES IN CONCRETE. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS, REQUIRED BY GOVERNING CODES, SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ORDER TO MAINTAIN MANUFACTURER'S MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE LOADS, ABBREVIATIONS AGE ABOVE GRADE LEVEL BTS BASE TRANSCEIVER STATION (E) EXISTING (P) PROPOSED MIN MINIMUM N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE PER REFERENCE U.O.N. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED RF RADIO FREQUENCY T.B.D. TO BE DETERMINED T.B.R. TO BE RESOLVED TYR TYPICAL REG REQUIRED ECR EQUIPMENT GROUND RING AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE MOB MASTER GROUND BUS EG EQUIPMENT GROUND BCW BARE COPPER WIRE SIAD SMART INTEGRATED ACCESS DEQ GEN GENERATOR TGR INTERIOR GROUND RING (HALO) RBS RADIO BASE STATION L It-, PH R JO1 No. 0402 0 419- 1 ml. )G EYE SIRBALIGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD GORE, VA 2637 v.a ror v E f�< W ,g Tile NOTES loN,�.b.1 N1 SYMBOLS S G SOLID GROUND BUS BAR S N SOLID NEUTRAL BUS BAR -SUPPLEMENTAL GROUND CONDUCTOR u 2 -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC 0 o CIRCUIT BREAKER -� SINGLE -POLE THERMAL -MAGNETIC CIRCUIT BREAKER e CHEMICAL GROUND ROD Q GROUND ROD DISCONNECT SWITCH O METER CADWELD TYPE CONNECTION ■ COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION - .- GROUNDING WIRE L It-, PH R JO1 No. 0402 0 419- 1 ml. )G EYE SIRBALIGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD GORE, VA 2637 v.a ror v E f�< W ,g Tile NOTES loN,�.b.1 N1 GENERAL ELECTRICAL AND GROUNDING NOTES: PART 1 - OENFRAI 1.1 GENERAL CONDITIONS: A. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. ANY QUESTIONS ARISING DURING THE BID PERIOD IN REGARDS TO THE CONTRACTORS FUNCTIONS, THE SCOPE OF WORK, OR ANY OTHER $$DE RELATED TO HIS PROJECT SHALL BE BROUGHT UP OU RING THE BID PERIOD WITH THE PROJECT MANAGER FOR CLARIFlCATION, NOT AFTER THE CONTRACT HAS BEEN AWARDED. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN PER MI75. LICENSES, MAKE AlL DEPOSITS, AND PAY ALL FEES REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE FOR THE WORK UNDER iHl$ SECTION. C. DRAWINGS SHOW THE GENERAL ARRANGEMENT OF ALL SYSTEMS AND CCMPONENTS COVERED UNDER THIS SECTION. THE CO TRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS. DRAWING SHALL NOT BE SCALED TO DETERMINE DIMENSIONS. 1.2 LAWS, REGULATIONS. ORDINANCES, STATUTES AND CODES. A. ALL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, AND ALL APPLICABLE LOCAL LAWS, REGULATIONS, ORDINANCES, STAY TIES AND CODES. NO BENDS SHALL BE THE RADIUS BEND FOR THE TRADE SIZE OF CONDUIT IN COMPLIANCE WIH THE LATEST EDITIONS OF NEC. 1.3 REFERENCES: A. THE PUBLICATIONS LISTED BELOW ARE PART OF THIS SPECIFICATION. EACH PUBLICATION SHALL BE HE LATEST REVISION AND ADDENDUM IN EFFECT ON THE DATE. MIS SPECIFICATION IS ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BY THE REOUIREMENi SPECIf11:I HEREIN OR THE DETAILS OF THE DRAWINGS, RK INCLUDED IN THIS SPECIFICATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE APPLICABLE PROVISION OF THESE PUBLICATIONS. 1. ANSI/IEEE (AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARDS INSTRUTE) 2. ASTM (AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TESTING AND MATERIALS) 3. ICE (INSULATED CABLE ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION) d. NEMA (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL MANUFACTURER'S ASSOCIATION) 5.NFPA (NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION) 6. OSHA (OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION) 7. UL (UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES. INC.) 8. AT& GROUNDING AND BONDING STANDARDS 1.4 SCOPE OF WORK: A. WORK UNDER THIS SECTION SHALL CONSIST OF FURNISHING ALL LABOR, MATERIAL, AND ASSOCIATED SERVICES REQUIRED TO COMPLETE REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION AND BE OPERATIONAL. S. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL BE PROPERLY TESTED, ADJUSTED, AND ALIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR. C. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL EXCAVATING, DRAINING. TRENCHES, BACKFlLUNG. AND REMOVAL OF EXCESS DIRT. D. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE OWNER WITH CERTIFICATES 01 A FINAL INSPECTION AND APPROVAL FROM THE INSPECTION AL ITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, E. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A COMPLETE SE7 OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS. DOCUMENT ALL WIRING EQUIPMENT CONDITIONS, AND CHANGES WHILE COMPLETING HIS CONTRACT. HE AS -BUILT DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AT COMPLETION OF HE PROJECT PART 2 - PRODUCTS 2.1 GENERAL: A. ALL MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE UL LISTED, NEW, AND FREE PROM DEFECTS. B. ALL ITEMS OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO THE AUTHORITY HAVING JURISDICTION AS SUITABLE FOR THE USE INTENDED. C. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BEAR THE UNDERWRITERS LABORATORIES LABEL OF APPROVAL, AND SHALL CONFORM TO REQUIREMENT OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE, D. ALL CA URREN7 DEVICES SHALL HAVE AN INTERRUPTING CURRENT RAPING THAT SHALL BE GREATER THAN THE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT TO WHICH THEY ARE SUBJECTED, 10,000 AIC MINIMUM. VERIFY AVAILABLE SHORT CIRCUIT CURRENT DOES NOT EXCEED HE RATING OF ELECTRICAL EOUIPMENi IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 110.24 NEC OR THE MOST CURRENT ADOPTED CODE PER THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION, 2.2 MATERIALS AND EOLIPMENT. & CONDUIT: 1, RIGID METAL CONDUIT (RMC) SHALL BE HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED INSIi7E AND OUTSIDE INCLUDING ENDS ANO THRE^0$ AND ENAMELED OR LACQUERED INSIDE IN ADDITION TO GALVANIZING. 2, LIOUIDTICHT FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT SHALL BE UL LISTED. 3. CONDUIT CLAMPS, STRAPS AND SUPPORTS SHALL BE STEEL OR MALL'DABLE IRON, ALL FIRINGS SHALL AE COMPRESSION AND CONCRETE TIGHT TYPE. GROUNDING BUSHINGS WITH INSULATED THROATS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON ALL CONDUIT TERMINATIONS. 4. NONMETALLIC CONDUIT AND FUTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC OR SCHEDULE 80 PVC WHERE SPECIFIED. INSTALL USING SOLVENT -CEMENT -TYPE JOINTS AS RECOMMENDED BY THE MANUFACTURER. S. CONDUCTORS AND CABLE: 1. CONDUCTORS AND CABLE SHALL BE FLAME-RETARDANT, MOISTURE AND HEAT RESISTANT THERMOPLASTIC, SNGLE CONDUCTOR, COPPER, TYPE HHN/THWN-2, 600 VOLT, SIZE AS INDICATED, X12 AWG SHALL BE THE MINIMUM SIZE CONDUCTOR USED. 2. X10 AWG AND SMALLER CONDUCTOR SHALL BE SOLID OR STRANDED .AND NB AND AND LARGER CONDUCTORS SHIE STRANDED. 3, 5 DERBESS, COMPRESSION -TYPE CONNECTORS SHALL BE USED FOR TERMINATION OF ALL STRANDED CONDUCTORS. 4. STRAIN -RELIEF SUPPORTS GRIPS SHALL BE HUBBELL KELLEMS OR APPROVED EQUAL, CABLES SHALL BE 5. ALL COPPORTE IN NDUC ORS SHALLLNBE TAGGECE WITH D AiNBOTHEC NDNDABOF MANUFACTURER' RECOMMENDATIONS, AT AML PULL (BOXES, J -BOXES, EQUIPMENT AND CABINETS AND SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH APPROVED PLASTIC TAGS (ACTION CRAFT, BRADY, OR APPROVED EQUAL). C. DISCONNECT SWITCHES: 1. DISCONNECT SWITCHES SHALL BE HEAVY DUTY, OEAO-FRONT, QUICK -MAKE, OUICN-BREAK, EXTERNALLY OPERABLE, HANDLE LOCKABLE AND INTERLOCK WIH COVER IN CLOSED POSITION, RATING AS INDICATED, UL LABELED FURNISHED IN NEMA 3R ENCLOSURE, SQUARE -D OR ENGINEERED APPROVED EOVAL. D. CHEMICAL ELECTROLYTIC GROUNDING SYSTEM: I. INSTALL CHEMICAL GROUNDING AS REQUIRED, THE SYSTEM SHALL BE ELECTROLYTIC MAINTENANCE FREE ELECTRODE CONSISTING OF RODS WITH A MINIMUM M2 AWG CU EXOTHERMALLY WELDED PIGTAIL. PROTECTIVE BOXES, AND BACKFILL MATERML. MANUFACTURER SHALL BE LYNCOLE XIT GROUNDING ROD TYPES K2 -(•)CS OR 12L 1)11 (•) LENGTH AS REQUIRED, 2. GRD 0,OUND ACCESS BOX SHALL BE A POLYPVSTIC BOX FOR NON -TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS, INCLUDING BOLT L DISCONNET SWITCHES AND CONTROLLING DEVICECOVERSWSHALL BE TPROVIDEDLEwITHIENCRAVHOS 'T FD XWACOID LNAM E UTES CINDICAi NC EQUIPMENT CONTROLLED, BRANCH CIRCUITS ID NUMBERING, AND THE ELECTRICAL POWER SOURCE. 3. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE LYNLGNBE ANO LYNCOLE GROUNDING GRAVEL. E, SYSTEM GROUNDING: 1. ALL GROUNDING COMPONENTS SHALL BE TINNED AND GROUNDING CONDUCTOR SHALL BE N2 AWG BARE, SOLID, TINNED, COPPER. ABOVE GRADE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSULATED WHERE NOTED. 2. GROUNDING BUSES SHALL BE BARE, TINNED, ANNEALED COPPER BARS OF RECTANGULAR CROSS SECTION. STANDARD BUS BARS MOB, SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. THEY SHALL NOF BE FABRICATED OR MODIFIED IN THE FISHED ALL GROUNDING BUSES SHALL BE IDENTIFIED WITH MINIMUM 3/4` LETTERS BY WAY OF STENCILING OR DESIGNATION PLATE. S. CONNECTORS SHALL BE RICH-CONDUCTiVIrv, HEAW DUTY, LISTED AND LABELED AS GROUNDING CONNECTORS FOR THE MATERIALS USED, USE TWO -HOLE COMPRESSION LUGS WITH HEAT SHRINK FOR MECHANICAL CONNECTIONS. INTERIOR CONNECTIONS USE TWO -HOLE COMPRESSION LUGS WITH INSPECTION WINDOW AND CLEAR HEAT SHRINK. 4. EXOTHERMIC WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN KIT FORM AND SELECTED FOR THE SPECIFIC TYPES. SIZES, AND COMBINATIONS OF CONDUCTORS AND 07HER ITEMS TO BE CONNECTED.N AND 5. GROUND RODS SHALL BE ERICO X615800, COPPER -CLAD STEEL WITH HIGH-STRENGTH STEEL CORE ELECTROLYTIC -GRADE COPPER OUTER SHEATH, MOLTEN WELDED TO CORE. 5/8'00'-0'. ALL GROUNDING RODS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH INSPECTION SLEEVES. 6. INSTALL AN EQUIPMENT CROU NOING CONDUCTOR IN ALL CONDUIT$ IN COMPLLANCE WITH THE AT&T $PECIFICADONS AND NEC. THE EQUIPMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE BONDED AT ALL JUNCTION BOXES. PULLBOXES, 0ISO 0NNECT SWITCHES. STARTERS, AND EQUIPMENT CABINETS. F. OTHER MATERIALS: 1, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE OHER MATERNLS. THOUGH NOT SPECIFICALLY DESCRIBED. WHICH ARE REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETELY OPERATIONAL SYSTEM AND vROPER INSTALLATION OF THE WORK. 2. PROVIDE PULL BOXES AND JUNCTION BOXES WHERE SHOWN OR REQUIRED BY NEC. G. PANELS AND LOAD CENTERS: 1. ALL PANEL DIRECTORIES SHALL BE TYPEWRITTEN, PART 3 - EXECUTION 3.1 GENERAL: A. ALL MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH HE MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. B. EQUIPMENT SHALL BE TIGHTLY COVERED AND PROTECTED AGAINST DIRT OR WATER, AND AGAINST CHEMICAL OR MECHANICAL INJURY DURING INSTALLATION AND CONSTRUCTION PERIODS. 3.2 LABOR AND WORKMANSHIP: A. ALL LABOR FORME INSTALLATIONLED BY lXll E, OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT FURNISHED FOR THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM SHAL OR B. ALLLELECTRICALL EOUIPMENTPSHALL BE AWUSTED. ALIGNEDTAND TESTED AND BN- KY THEE CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO PRODUCE THE INTENDED PERFORMANCE. C. UPON COMPLETION OF WORK, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL THOROUGHLY CLEW ALL EXPOSED EQUIPMENT, REMOVE ALL IABELS AND ANY DEBRIS, CRATING OR CARTONS AND LEAVE HE INSTALLATION FINISHED AND READY FOR OPERATION. 3.3 COORDINATION: A, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF ELECTRICAL ITEMS WITH THE WORK. OWNER -FURNISHED EQUIPMENT DELIVERY SCHEDULE TO PREVENT UNNECESSARY DELAYS IN THE TOTAL 3.4 INSTALLATION: A. CONDUIT: LESS 1, ALL ELECTRICAL WIRING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONDUIT AS SPECIFIED, NO CONDUIT OR TUBING OF THAN 3/4 INCH TRADE SIZE. 2, PROVIDE RIGID GALVANIZED STEEL CONDUITS FOR ALL RISERS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED EMT MAY BE INSTALLED FOR EXTERIOR CONDUITS WHERE NOT SUBJECT TO PHYSICAL DAMAGE. 3. INSTALL SC H. 80 PVC CONDUIT WITH A MINIMUM COVER OF 24' UNDER ROADWAYS, PARKING LOTS, STREETS, AND ALLEYS. CONDUIT SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM COVER OF IB' R ALL S. ER NON -TRAFFIC APPLICATIONS (REFER TO 2008 NEC, TABLE 3005). 4, USE GALVANIZED FLEXIBLE STEEL CONDUIT WHERE DIRECT CONNECTION 10 EQUIPMENT WITH MOVEMENT, VIBRATION, OR FOR EASE OF MAINTENANCE. USE LIQUID TIGHT, FLEXIBLE METAL CONDUIT FOR OUTDOOR APPLICATIONS. INSTALL GALVANIZED FLEXIBLE STEEL CONDUIT AT ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION TO ON SUPPORT T 5. A RUN EQUIPMENT CONOUIFDBEIWBEN BOXES ORALLOW EOUIPMENI%SHALL NOT NCONTTAINR CONTRACTION, ENTHAN THE EOUNALENT OF THREE QUARTER -BENDS. CONDUIT BEND SHALL BE MADE WITH THE UL LISTED BENDER OR FACTORY 90 DEGREE ELBOWS MAY BE USED. 6. FIELD FABRICATED CONDUITS SHALL BE CUT SQUARE WITH A CONDUIT CUTTING TOOL AND REAMED TO PROVIDEA SMOOTH INSIDE SURFACE, 7. PROVIDE INSULATED GROUNDING BUSHING FOR ALL CONDUITS. B. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING ALL CONDUITS DURING CONSTRUCTION, TEMPORARY OPENINGS IN THE CONDUIT SYSTEM SHALL BE PLUGGED OR GAUP MOISTURE HALL TO PREVENT ENTRANCE OF OR FOREIGN MATTER. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPLACE ANY CONDUITS CONTAINING FOREIGN MATERIALS THAT CANNOT BE REMOVED. 9. ALL CONDUITS SHALL BE SWABBED CLEAN BY PULLING AN APPROPRIATE SIZE MANDREL THROUGH THE CONDUIT BEFORE INSTALLATION OF CONDUCTORS OR CABLES, CONDUIT SHALL BE FREE OF DIRT AND DEBRIS. 10. INSTALL PULL STRINGS IN ALL CLEAN EMPTY CONDUITS. IDENTIFY PULL STRINGS AT EACH END, 11, INSTALL Y ORS.HIGHLY VISIBLE AND DETECTABLE TAPE 12' ABOVE ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUITS AND CONDUCT 12. CONDUITS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE AGAINST COLLECTION OF TRAPPED CONDENSATION. 13. BE PROVIDE CORE DRILLING AS NECESSARY FOR PENETRATIONS TO ALLOW FOR RACEWAYS AND CABLES TO ROUTED THROUGH THE BUILDING. DO NOT PENETRATE STRUCTURAL MEMBERS. SLEEVES AND�OR PENETRATIONS IN FIRE RATED CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE EFFECTIVELY SEALED WITH FIRE RATED MATERIAL WHICH SHALL MAINTAIN THE FIRE RATING OF THE WALL OR STRUCTURE. FIRE STOPS AT FLOOR PENETRATIONS SHALL PREVENT PASSAGE OF WATER, SMOKE, FIRE, AND FUMES. ALL MATERIAL SHALL BE UL APPROVED FOR HIS PURPOSE. B. CONDUCTORS AND CABLE: 1. SPLICES SHALL BE MADE ONLY AT OUTLETS, SLACK BOXES, OR ACCESSIBLE RACEWAY CONOULETS APPROVED FOR THIS PURPOSE, 2. PULLING LUBRICANTS SHALL BE UL APPROVED. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE NYLON OR HEMP ROPE FOR PULLING CONDUCTOR OR CABLES INTO THE CONDUIT. CABLES SHALL BE NEATLY TRAINED, WIHONT INTERLACING, AND BE OF SUFFICIENT LENGTH IN ALI BOXES & EQUIPMENT TO PERMIT MAKING A NARRANGEMENT. CABLES SHALL BE SECURED IN MANNER TO AVOID TENSION ON CONOUGTDR$ OREAT TERMINALS. CONDUCTORS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM MECHANICAL INJURY AND MOISTURE. SHARP BENDS OVER CONDUIT BUSHINGS IS PRDHIBITEL DAMAGED CABLES SHALL BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE, ALL POWER WIRING SHALL BE COLOR CODED AS FOLLOWS: RIPTI N 208/24C/`M._VQLT.,SYT Mj, PHASE A BLACK PHASE B RED PHASE C BLUE NEUTRAL WHITE GROUNDING GREEN C. DISCONNECT SWITCHES: 1. INSTALL DISCONNECT SWITCHES LEVEL AND PLUMB. CONNECT TO WIRING SYSTEM AND GROUNDING SYSTEM AS INDICATED. D. GROUNDING: 1. ALL METALLIC PARTS OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WHICH DO NOT CARRY CURRENT SHALL BE GROUNDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HE REQUIREMENT$ OF THE BUILDING MANUFACTURER, AT GROUNDING AND BONDING STANDARDS. AND THE NATO NAL ELECTRICAL CODE. 2. PROVIDE ELECTRICAL GROUNDING AND BONDING SYSTEM INDICATED WIH ASSEMBLY OF MATERIALS, INCLUDING GROUNDING ELECTRODES. BONDING JUMPERS AND ADDITIONAL ACCESSORIES AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE INSTALLATION. 3. ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTOR$ SHALL PROVIDE A STRAIGHT DOWNWARD PATH 70 GROUND WITH GRADUAL BEND AS REQUIRED. GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL NOT BE LOOPED OR SH4RPLY BENT. ROUTE GROUNDING CONNECTIONS AND CONDUCTORS TO GROUND IN THE SHORTEST AND STRAIGHTEST PATHS POSSIBLE i0 MINIMIZE TRANS( ENT VOLTAGE RISES. 4. BUILDINGS AND/OR NEW TOWERS GREATER THAN 75 FEET IN HEIGHT AND WHERE THE MAIN GROUNDING CONDUCTORS ARE REOUI RED i0 BE ROUTED TO GRADE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUTE IWQ GROUNDING CONDUCTORS FROM THE ROOFTOP, TOWERS, AND WATER TOWERS GROUND RING, TO THE EXISTING 'HOUNDING SYSTEM, THE GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SNALI NOT BE SMALLER THAN 2 0 AWG COPPER. ROOROv GROUND RING SHALL BE BONDED AL HE EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM, THE BUILDING STEEL COLUMNS, LIGHTNING PROTECTION SYSTEM. AND BUILDING MAIN WATER LINE (fERR0U5 OR NONFERROUS METAL PIPING ONLY) 5. TIGHTEN GROUNDING ANO BONDING CONNECTORS, INCLUDING SCREWS AND BOLTS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S PUBLISHED TORQUE TIGHTENING VALUES FOR CONNECTORS AND BOLTS. WHERE MANUFACTURER'S TORQUING REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, TIGHTEN CONNECTIONS TO COMPLY WITH TIGHTENING TORQUE VALUES SPE CIFIEDIN UL TO ASSURE PERMANENT AND EFFECTIVE GROUNDING. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATIONS OF GROUNDING TIE -IN -POINTS i0 THE EXISTING GROUNDING SYSTEM. ALL UNDERGROUND GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY THE EXOTHERMIC WELD PROCESS AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S NSTRUCTIONS. 7, ALL GROUNDING CONNECTIONS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR TIGHTNESS. EXOTHERMIC WELDED CONNECTIONS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE INSPECTOR HAVING JU RISOICTION BEFORE BEING PERMANENTLY CONCEALED. 6, APPLY CORROSION -RESISTANCE FINISH TO FIELD CONNECTIONS AND PLACER WHERE FACTORY APPLIED PROiECTNE COATINGS HAVE BEEN DESTROYED. USE KOPR-SHIELD ANTI-0%(DATION COMPOUND ON ALL COMPRESSION GROUNDING CONNECTIONS. 9. A SEPARATE, CONTINUOUS, INSULATED EC"pMENT GROUNDING CONDUCTOR "ALLBE: INSTALLED IN ALL FEEDER AND BRANCH CIRCUIT, . 10. BOND ALL INSULATED GROUNDING BUSHINGS WITH A BARE 6 AWC GROUNDING CONDUCTOR TO A GROUND BUS. 11, DIRECT BURIED GROUNDING CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT A NOMINAL DEPTH OF 36" MINIMUM BELOW GRADE, OR 5' BELOW THE FROST LINE, USE THE GREATER OF THE TWO DISTANCES. 12, ALL GROUNDING CONDUCTORS EMBEDDED IN OR PENETRATING CONCRETE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT 13. THEINSTALLATION OF CHEMICAL ELECTROLYTIC GROUNDING SYSTEM IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. REMOVE SEALING TAPE FROM LEACHING AND BREATHERHOLES. INSTALL PROTECTIVE BOX FLUSH WITH GRADE, 14, DRIVE GROUND RODS UNTIL TOPS ARE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 36' DEPTH OR 6" BELOW 15, IF RCOAXOST L ON HENG THE ICE BRIDGE $RMOREOF TTHAN 6 F7HE TWO 5�GROMS THE GROUND 84R AT THE BASE OF THE TOWER, A SECOND GROUND BAR WILL BE NEEDED AT THE END OF THE ICE BRIDGE, i0 GROUND THE COAX CABLE GROUNDING KITS AND IN-LINE ARRESTORS 16, CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR, AND REPLACE, E%(STING GROUNDING SYSTEM COMPONENTS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT THE CONTRACTORS ENENSE. 3.5 ACCEPTANCE TESTING: A. CERTIFIED PERSONNEL USING CERTIFIED EQUIPMENT .SHALL PERFORM REQUIRED TESTS AND SUBMIT WRITTEN TEST REPORTS UPON COMPLETION. B. WHEN REQUIREMENTS, HE NON -COMPLYING OR NIP15 ITEMSFOSHALL BE REMOVED NOT TO COMPLY FROM THE PROJECT ESTE AND REPLACED WITH ITEMS COMPLYING WITH THE SPECIFIED REQUIREMENTS PROMPTLY AFTER RECEIPT OF NOTICE FOR NON-COMPLIANCE. C TEST PROCEDURES; 1. ALL FEEDERS SHALL HAVE INSULATION TESTED AFTER INSTALLATION, BEFORE CONNECTION TO DEVICES. HE CONDUCTORS SHALL TEST FREEFROM SHORT CIRCUITS AND GROUNDS. TESTING SHALL BE FOR ONE MINUTE USING IOOOV DC. PROVIDE WRITTEN DOCUMENTATION FOR ALL TEST RESULTS. 2. PRIOR TO ENERGIZING CIRCUITRY, TEST WIRING DEVICES FOR ELECTRICAL CONTINUITY AND PROPER POLARITY CONNECTIONS. 3. MEASURE AND RECORD VOLTAGES BETWEEN PHASESOF MAXIMUM AND MIN I AND BETWEEN PHASE CONDUCTORS AND NEUTRALS. SEE 4. PERFORM GROUNDING TESTMIT ARTO MEASURE GROUNDINGMUM RESISTANCEEOF GROUNDING SYSTEM USING THE IEEE STANDARD 3-POIN7 "FALL -OF -POTENTIAL' METHOD. PROVIDE PLOTTED TEST VALUES AND LOCATION SKETCH. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF MEASURED VALUE IS OVER 5 OHMS. GENERAL SITE NOTES' ,pF�^ PROPOSED AT&r MERIV 120/NOv 1. A COMPLETE BOUNDARY SURVEY OF THE H09 PARCEL HIS NOT WN J 61-6,x 6'-6 BEEN PERFORMED By NFINGY SOLUi0N5 BOUNDARY INFORMATION WAS OBTANE FROM OEEDE GS DATA ANO PUNS OF RECORD.Q. w STEEL IMC (NEO /20060) ON z. SITE NFORMAr DN wAs 0 AWED FROM A FIELO INVESTIGATION SIM PEDESTALS ON CONCRfIE PAD PERFORMED BY INFNGY SOWT0N5 CONTMCiOR i0 FIELD VEF FX r (NEO /20.714) AND PROPOSED DIMENS ONS AS NECESSARY BEFORE CONSTRUCnON. \ J THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT NGLUDE SGNS OF Ar&r JDKW dESEL (E-i1'ER1RM *•', 'N "' ,A. /\.� AovERns Nc. z ° n \ - E%ISiING.UTILITY POLE I Z ¢ i W 160 cV.LON TANK ` 4 ME PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT IS UNMANNED AND THEREFORE DOES (DENERIC/NEO /202-10) a1' \ 1' \ \ • ` j NOT REQUIRE A MEANS OF WATER SUPPLY OR SEWAGE DISPOSAL. ^`R •y!. S. NO LANDSCAPING WORN IS PROPOSED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS 7 PROPOSED l2X/6 CCWCREIE PAD / zp°z ),• DEVELOPMENT OTHER MAN THAT wn¢x Is snowN. `_ Lu a IN PROPOSED 12'-6X20' LEASE AREA �. / �sz6j, �� �/ s. THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DOES NOT INCLUDE OUTDOOR W (150 SF. (£ASE AREA) \\` STORAGE OR ANY SOLID WASTE RECEPTACLES, Z w 7. UTILITIES SHOWN ON PLAN ARE TAKEN FROM OWNERS RECORDS \ AND HELD LOCATION OF VISIBLE SURFACE FEATURES. THE w \ = , EXISTENCE. EXTENT AND EXACT HORZONTAL AND VERTGAL LOWnONs OF UT CITIES HAS NOT BEEN VERIFIED. ANY CONTRACTOR Z PERFORMING WORK ON THS STE MUST CONTACT MSS UTILITY AT IJ,� LFASi IB HOURS PROF TO COMMENCING WORN 9. PER FEW FIRM 151069CM70D, EFF 09/02/2009, THE PROPOSED EM I N iJy# 1 V AT&T UCOCDEVELOPMENT WILL OCCUR IN ZONE 5f AREA OF MINIMAL PROPOSED LANDSCAPINGTYP/CAL CIF (IS). FINAL / HASARD APPROVAL PENDING „1/RiSdCldl CCWFl/aNA ION. \�\` SITE LEGEND ,'ti,,�\ PROPOSED (2) 4' CLWONIIs /• FOR PoMER J75'!) (BY DINERS) ; PROPOSED (l) 4' CGAI `\ - - SITE PROPERTY LIN,. JBOYI 1 ) (FOR /FOLD (6YO INQtS) \ - STREET OR ROAD \ PROPI 20' GRAM AGti'E5S � '� l 1 � TREE/SHRUB t 14 DRIVE, t320' LAND (BY DI�/fRs) \ ri Y /. / $ 10 TREE LINE 4,,J 17�/ �S UTILITY POLE/PROPOSED GALVAN/2ED flN/54 I6J' / , s:r � //MONOPOLE IDNER(BYOTHERS) EXISTING UTILITY POLE (SVEC #41) PH R JOHN \ PROPOSED 60','50' FENCED cavPaNO j _ (2500 d Ac. No. 040205345 SF,) (6Y DINERS) 0- --' :. fQ5Y f .xQ� ' } / PROPOSED ' PARKING %0$104/2020 URNARWLIVID AIE 1 PROPOSED IGO' TONER FALL ZONE nAa / Dnxn / / `✓ ^��' "�+kL F fir i r 1T � F FROG EYE SSIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA#10138153 :XISi1NG iREELINE (TYR) - `� (J �, III orHRVIEw RonD / ADRE. VA?2R3J _ I � L/ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE (TYP) \ .J EXISTING BUILDING (iYP) / i D,,,hIIwn9 rl. GRAPHIC SCALE, F• i 1 1TE PLAN 100' so' o so' 100' SITE PLAN NORTH \_Lj SCALE: AS NOTED SCALE (11x17): 1" = 100'-OM SCALE (22x34): 1" = 50'-0', FZ7�;� 50' PROPOSED LANDSCAPNG TYPICAL OF (15). MAL APPROVAL PENDING "S01C770V COHRR.MA170H jI x -x -x- -x f w s r FUTURE , r FUTURE , FUTURE f w S x I 12'x20' 12'x16'x 2'x25' EASE EASE A L(240 S.F.)A L(1192 S.F.) y� LEASE(300 S,F.)A t Sis ws PROPOSED GALVANIZED FIN/5N 191' x I 25' L MOVCPOE TONER (BY OTHERS) — ,T' L—�L PROPOSED CABLE -- COVER 'DOGHOUSE' 70 BE MSTAUXV OIER PROPOSED (J) 6-0 CONDUIT x SNB UP O IDNER t 15 f w PROPOSED NANDHO,E (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED PAD MOLW70 TRANSFORMER (BY DINERS) I- x - PRCPOSED COVO(6TS (FOR (BY OTHwERS)m) 175'.!) PROPOSED 120/210V, 11 6 GANG METER STAG! NIEWANDOAN VALLEY EZECIRIC CLOP) (BY OTHERS) IY/ PROPOSED 120/11OV, 10t 200A AT&T METER AND MCR. PROPOSED 2' UG CONDUIT (FDP(, FDP AT&T 200A POWER, - ) PROPOSED 2' UO COVOAT (FOR AT&r 7E000, ISI) PROPOSED (2) DCII SUROE' SUPPRESSORS MOUNTED 710 O(IMOR WALL OF WC. - SED 50'x50' FENCED COMPOUND SF.) (BY OTHERS) PROPOSED AT&r (J) 6'I UNDERGROM PVC CONDUTS W/ PROPOSED (J) 24PR RBE? CABLES PROPOSED (9) 6/C DC CABLES MPOUN Q PLAN N0 CO2 SCALE: AS NOTED GRAPHI A ' 20' 1%Mmm� SCALE (11x17); 1" = 20'-0" SCALE (22x34): 1" = 10'-0" TOP OF PROPOSED UGITMNC ROD OVETPALL NE/GNTI _ fLEVARpI. 1199=0AQ -T�OP OF PROPOSED NOIOPOE T NEVA ROV� NiYEr- AR - j_ TOP PROPOSEDT&T AANTENNAS_ Tl—O' E/EVAROV., 2191'-0 AGt - �— OF PROPOSED AT&T AN/ENNAS EIEVA DCN: 2168'-0' ACL FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER ELEVATION: }178'-0' AGL FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER ELEVATION: 1166'-0" AGL FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER ELEVATION: ±158'-0" AGL GRADE LEVEL ELEVATION:0 -D ACL 2 TI \_L2j NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED 6' UCHM/NG ROD (BY DINERS) PROPOSED AT&r AN7ENNA ARRAY W/ (12) ANTENNAS (6 ,#STALL, 6 FunW) (15) RRNs (9 INSTALL, 6 FUME) (J) DC9r (J /MMU) FUTURE CARRIER ANTEENA ARRAY (TYP OF 3) PROPOSED CAL VANIZED RN/SH NOVO TONER (BY 0MERS) W/ PROPOSED (J) AT&T 24PR FIBER CA PROPOSED (9) AT&T 6/C OC POWER CABLES ROU7E0 INSIDE POE PROPOSED 6' CHAIN LW FENCE W/ 1' BARBED HIRE & GREEN NNK SLA IS (BY OTHERS) x h AT&T 120/24OV, 10,, 200A PRC W/ J ON PLUG (INTEGRAL 70 INC) PROPOSED Ar&T WROV 120/140V - IN f STEEL NICC(NEOj1O%'O) ON ( ,w STEEL PEDESTALS' QV CONCRETE PAD O (NEO /20124) AND PROPOSED J AT&r JOKW OESEL GENERATOR W/ 180 GALLON TANK Vr fa Aq f (GENERACINEO /202JO) ON C �A x PROPOSED 12'X16' CONCRE7E PAD IN PROPOSED 12' -MM' LEASE AREA (250 SF. LEASE AREA) PROPOSED AT&T iv -nem' LEASE AREA (250 SF. LEASE AREA) AT&T CPS ANTENNA (ATTACHED ro NIC) PROPOSED T2' ACCESS CA IF (BY OTHERS) MPOUN Q PLAN N0 CO2 SCALE: AS NOTED GRAPHI A ' 20' 1%Mmm� SCALE (11x17); 1" = 20'-0" SCALE (22x34): 1" = 10'-0" TOP OF PROPOSED UGITMNC ROD OVETPALL NE/GNTI _ fLEVARpI. 1199=0AQ -T�OP OF PROPOSED NOIOPOE T NEVA ROV� NiYEr- AR - j_ TOP PROPOSEDT&T AANTENNAS_ Tl—O' E/EVAROV., 2191'-0 AGt - �— OF PROPOSED AT&T AN/ENNAS EIEVA DCN: 2168'-0' ACL FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER ELEVATION: }178'-0' AGL FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER ELEVATION: 1166'-0" AGL FUTURE CARRIER RAD CENTER ELEVATION: ±158'-0" AGL GRADE LEVEL ELEVATION:0 -D ACL 2 TI \_L2j NOT TO SCALE PROPOSED 6' UCHM/NG ROD (BY DINERS) PROPOSED AT&r AN7ENNA ARRAY W/ (12) ANTENNAS (6 ,#STALL, 6 FunW) (15) RRNs (9 INSTALL, 6 FUME) (J) DC9r (J /MMU) FUTURE CARRIER ANTEENA ARRAY (TYP OF 3) PROPOSED CAL VANIZED RN/SH NOVO TONER (BY 0MERS) W/ PROPOSED (J) AT&T 24PR FIBER CA PROPOSED (9) AT&T 6/C OC POWER CABLES ROU7E0 INSIDE POE PROPOSED 6' CHAIN LW FENCE W/ 1' BARBED HIRE & GREEN NNK SLA IS (BY OTHERS) SECTOR PROPOSED ANTENNA SCHEDULE AND RF SYSTEM DESIGN PLAN (RFDS DATED 02/22/2019, V2019_1.0) AN71N NA ANTENNA MAKE/MODEL RAD CTR. AZIMUTH M -TILT RRH MAKE/MODEL POSITION FT. AOL E -TILT FEEDLINE FEEDLINE LENGTH JUMPER LENGTH A Al FUTURE - _ 2. THE STANDARD IS BASED ON EIGHT COLORED (!) 24PR FlBER OR, CABLE (J) 61C /VAMC OC CABLES 1401 CONNSCO E' NORIA A/RSCALE DUAL RRH 4 r4 8/2/14 J20W AIWBA LTE _700:2 2 NNFH-65C-RI / 188-0' 60' 0 NOlOA A/RSCACE DUAL RRH 4 r4 825/66 320W AHFlB LTE 1800 AMS 2d 11 i 11 t a3 COI 188'-0' 60' 0 NORIA AHCA 85 A/RSCALE RRH 4T4R 85 16OW ANCA LTE 850 G 850 W, 2 NNHH-650-RI FUTURE NCS RRH I2'2 #d FUTURE_ ' - FUTURE 7000 RRH 122 B N5 FUTURE MARKING COLOR CONVENTION TABLE'. W 4. COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3" WIDE AT TOP AND _ 24PR 16A 0P8C CABLECABLES (J) 6/C /SANG OC CABLES a f JUMPERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. COANSCOPE !BD 0 NCKA A/RSCALE DUAL RRH 47`4R 912/14 32OW AMBA LLE _700-2 NNNX-65C-RI X6 l8B-0. NOKIA A/RSCALE DUAL RRH 4T4R 925166 J20W AHR/B LTE 1900 k AMS:• 2.5 IZ2 2'1 OMMSCOPE(I) I♦7 NNHH-6 4 ' 180' 0 NQY/A ANCA 85 A/RSCALE RRH 4TM 65 160W ARCA LIF 8X1 R 850 SG• 1 FUTURE WC5 RRH 121t NB FUTURE - FUIURE 7000 RRH OUT SO AS TO AVOID UNRAVELING. C #9 FUTURE ,� �I 7. ALL COLOR CODES SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 AS TO ■� ALIGN NEATLY WITH ONE ANOTHER FROM SIDE -TO -B' C� _ (l) 24PR PREP DPRC CABCf (J) 6/C /6A MC OC CABLES 1102 #10 OCNNSCOPf 18g.-0• J00• 0 M04A A/RS'CALE DUAL RRH 474R 812114 52OW AHLBA LTE 70O 2 NNHH-65C-R4 N A A/R3CALE DUAL RRH 4T4R 825/66 J20W AHPB LTE 1900 tr AMS 25 /T't 122 O #11 �N65C�4 188'_0• J00' 0 NOVA ANCA BS AIRSCALE RRH 4TIR BS 160W ARCA LIF 850 6 850 SG 1 FUTURE WC5 RRN 123 #12 FUTURE ' - - FUTURE 700D RRH _ GPS - CPS I _ - _ _ (!) 1/2' COAX CABLE SYSTEM & IF SYSTEM DESIGN PLAN NOTES, 000 1. S270R ORI-\TATION/AZIMU'H MILL VARY FROM REGION TO REGION ;ND S STE SREGC. REFFR TO SEPARATE R= RECO R' FOR EACH SITE TO DETERMINE THE ANTENNA LOr A",^,N AN7 FUNCTION 0' EACH TOWER SECTOR FACE. o U 2. THE STANDARD IS BASED ON EIGHT COLORED Z i TAPES -RED, BLUE, GREEN, YELLOW, BROWN, ORANGE. WHITE, AND SLATE(GREY). THESE TAPES SHOULD BE Z w" 8' READILY AVAILABLE TO THE ELECTRICIAN OR GDNTRACTOR ON n R Lu SITE. 11 1' a: Z o 3. USING COLOR BANDS ON THE CABLES. MARK ALL RIF e CABLE BY SECTOR AND CABLE NUMBER AS SHOWN ON "CABLE Z m MARKING COLOR CONVENTION TABLE'. W 4. COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3" WIDE AT TOP AND MIDDLE OF TOWER AND 2' WIDE AT THE BOTTOM. ALL JUMPERS SHALL BE INCLUDED. .1a 5. ALL COLOR CODE TAPE SHALL BE 3M-35 AND SHALL 6 BE INSTALLED USING A MINIMUM OF (3) WRAPS OF TAPE AND SHALL BE NEATLY TRIMMED AND SMOOTHED OUT SO AS TO AVOID UNRAVELING. Kw B. ALL COLOR BANDS INSTALLED AT OR NEAR THE GROUND SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/4" WIDE. , ,� �I 7. ALL COLOR CODES SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 AS TO ■� ALIGN NEATLY WITH ONE ANOTHER FROM SIDE -TO -B' C� -�j ;07 R JOHNS . 0402053459 •3/04/2020 CABLE IDENTIFICATION NOTES1. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING WITH THE MASTER COLOR CODE DOCUMENT. 2. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS aoeiwu IDENTIFICATION TAG (1-1/2" IN DIAMETER WITH 1/4' e_'E, STAMPED LETTERS AND NUMBERS ONE AT THE •mlwiz ANTENNA PORT CONNEC110N NEAR THE END OF THE e i•�xsn JUMPER AND ONE ON EACH END OF THE JUMPER mn>n SERVING THE RADIO EQUIPMENT. EACH TAG WILL BE ws os�sxn STAMPED WITH "ATT" AND THE ANTENNA PORT mn�m IDENTIFICATION NUMBER EXAMPLE BELOW. TAGS SHALL ."s azinn BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF UV RESISTANT ARE OR CABLE -TY, Dnlan.a �� ca.sa.e �eA,_ ATT SAMPLE 49a 2 ANTENNA 1'1 REFER TO AT&T ANTENNA na Tin•.• COLOR & NUMBERING SCHEME DATED 5/17/2005, FROG EYE SIRBAUGF REV. 2/2/2005 SITE ID: 4124 FA 11110138153 141 FAIRVIEW ROAD GORE, VA 2M7 P1w dFe, i Al y n g GAMMA, 3, L, OR Z ALPHA, 1, A, X cI CABLES IF CABLES /y\ c1 THRM c1D RREp'D Al TUE P As REc'p As Dew a m• 1-81 RF SCHEDULE BETA, 2, S. OR Y RF CABLES AND NOTES 81 THRU 910 A9 REO'D ANTENNA SECTOR AND D—P Nemn•1 CABLE DEFINITION C3 " �k NORTH \.Etj 1 AN ENNA ORIENTATION SCALE: NTS #12 WITH THE DOWNTILT SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA CABLE F/RSTNEf AN7EwA PIM AREA CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE. PROPOSED 2-7/8' X 120' LO 2. RRHS MUST BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA 3. 00 NOT INSTALL DOWNTILT BRACKETS ON FIRSTNET NI (NO RRHB 10 BE AaN7ED WI7111N) (7)P) pA0PO5E0 FJP-HRKIO HAND PAIL Alf I Proroet NumM A PAD. PNNf IID' EXPOSED AW (WNERE MERE WAS RUST BE G/LVIAIPE HAS BEEN N141GE0 U VAXIZING YIOX COLD-GALVPNIEING USE NTNG PE, PIPE x99-002 PROPOSED A AMENNA wopctnM. S FROG EYE SIRBAUGI ALLCABLESEVEN nes s1" BE O RF AB ro PREVENT Iwu N FROM 0(POSED sHur EDGES, RY FROM DO NOT ATTACH BRI55 LAGS TO RF CABLES FOR C.BIE IDENIITIGTION ()}P OF 2 PER SEC/0P, 6 lOiAL) gs�c�SFCTO #1. FA # 10138153 141 FNRMEW ROAD GORE, VA22637 0 A C, 42 4R •� 50 SWIVEL DOOM 1 /PROD54 ' PY,R Pti y60 l 10 m=ru — C #3 PROPOSED A/RSCALE 825166 RAN AND Q/ Drsvxn9 TTM PACWOSED A/RSCALE 911/ aRH MOW70 TO ti 2RAPHICOSCAL 41 2 4,RRNMOUNTINIC PROPOSED SBI'hi MOUNT 4 p1".H AN7ENNA DETAILS MP PER SEC70P, J 70iAL) A B #4 kb FUTURE FUTURE AT&T ANTENNA - OF 2 PER SECTOR, 6 TOTAL) •T '4 1Wn FUTURE 700 RRH MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA e �(TYR OF 1 PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL) q6 y7 E6 p5 k PROI LOW PROFILE PLA FMLNU W/ NMWCIFLNU PCAPLA PROPOSED F/RS7NEf AN7EHNAS (PoSRONS /2 /5 R /I0) PROPOSED = (7)P OF J) " �k NORTH \.Etj 1 AN ENNA ORIENTATION SCALE: NTS NOTES. 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA DOWNTILT BRACKET WITH THE DOWNTILT SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA CABLE WHEN RIG AF CON% JUMPERS, DPRL REI OR OC L1/ES LOCATED AT THE PLATFORM(PE LEVEL CONFIGURATION SCHEDULE. PROPOSED 2-7/8' X 120' LO 2. RRHS MUST BE MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNA 3. 00 NOT INSTALL DOWNTILT BRACKETS ON FIRSTNET ASJ AP. B, .73X9 SCN. 40 UMWMG PIPES ANTENNAS. PROPOSED AN7ENNA� pA0PO5E0 FJP-HRKIO HAND PAIL Alf I ANTENNA MN7EXff FOP -low MOON( 18.9 0 POSITION #2/#6/#10 TRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ANTENNA DOWNTILT BRACKET -WITH THE DDWNTILT SPECIFIED IN THE ANTENNA PROPOSED 2-716'X 120' IS ASO, OR, B, JSX9 SCN, 40 MOUN77NO PI PROPOSED 85 RRH AND PROPOSED 8JO RRR ON PROPOSED SWIVEL M t/ (SBE PRO l /RRI/DSV) AM. c 1l C:::vnr,:Ci W DC9 MOUNTING DETAIL \ AAITCAIAIA /DDU /,In "It ""III EICTAII J J G )' FORTRESS TRI -PLATFORM , E� a ODEL b: F3P-HRKIO V ,m. ZOS Z�z LLI y LL— 3 Z Z LIJ iw �o TRI -PLATFORM MOUNT WITH SITE PRO 1 MODEL q: FSP -TOW p 1 EPFi R JOHNS 2 _ NTENNA PLATFORM D AI c. No. 0402053459 cA SCALE: AS NOTED GRAPHIC SCALE �p 03/04/2020 6' 3' 0 3' aa,a SCALE (1107): 1" = 6'-0" M»A>= SCALE (22%341! 1" = A'-0" AT&T TOWER PIM NOTICE a=% WHEN RIG AF CON% JUMPERS, DPRL REI OR OC L1/ES LOCATED AT THE PLATFORM(PE LEVEL ssuc rwa n M °znsi sDrevr, ' AWE AVD/OR ANTENNA RAOCENTER, UTILIZE Ott- 2 W W.1E0 f/A' NIDE NYLON CARIE 116 (PER _. SUPPORT PONT) ENSURE THERE 6 NO RUSTING RUSH ON LIOE "E PIPE WHERE REM VE GER AND ADAPTER IRE TO BE A NIRS BRUSH OR @ DRILL TO REMOVE RA SRNG Oeslok ea e may_ THEACNEO, MOUNTING CLEMi THE MOUNTING SURFACE RE MAL MINOR (IWHERE G REMOAS AT AS A SCOTCH BRAE H GRI Proroet NumM A PAD. PNNf IID' EXPOSED AW (WNERE MERE WAS RUST BE G/LVIAIPE HAS BEEN N141GE0 U VAXIZING YIOX COLD-GALVPNIEING USE NTNG PE, PIPE x99-002 (LUMPS OR S BIRdAG) AVD TER SANDING) 11 C MOUNTING PIPE IF COLO -HIM PAINT WAS MELTED, ALV PAW WAS APPLIED, wopctnM. PANT H OWED NG ENSURE THE RSMT HAS OWED AEFORS APPLYING NO -0%, ZO NOT USE NOSE CIAMP$ i0 SECURE CABLEHWC#A6 GR wIICER nOMrHRs N recti PBI FROG EYE SIRBAUGI ALLCABLESEVEN nes s1" BE O RF AB ro PREVENT Iwu N FROM 0(POSED sHur EDGES, RY FROM DO NOT ATTACH BRI55 LAGS TO RF CABLES FOR C.BIE IDENIITIGTION • RRHs CANNOT BE LOCATED DIRECTLY BEHIND ANTENNA THEY ARE SERANG. SITE 10: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FNRMEW ROAD GORE, VA22637 Pr -0 F°, 812/814 RRH OSED 823166 RRH •� 50 SWIVEL DOOM 1 /PROD54 R? v 5 }t V �FSt ru ffie� m=ru — C y Q/ Drsvxn9 TTM ANTENNA AND 2RAPHICOSCAL 41 2 4,RRNMOUNTINIC DETAILS ALPHA SECTOR 6CC_Plprep_P20LFN7PAlA3—P30CWprep_P40prep_FO—NoDC—A wom BETA SECTOR 6CC—P 1p rep_P20 LFN7PAlA3_P30CWprep_P40p rep_FO—NoDC—B GAMMA SECTOR 6CC_Plprep_P20LFN7PAlA3_P30CWprep_P40prep_FO_NoDC_C ' OF 4) I TON WALL WAC UNI PIPE SNB �-B HVAC UNIT 2LBN (FOR CPS ANTENNA) I IOFKA'U' _ENTI'I PRESSORSA J S) 8' pi CONDUITS (PLUMBED THROUGH OONCREIE PAD) LEFT ELEVATION STEEL PEDESTALS (ORDERED FRONT EL VAROx BY VERTN SEPARAMY) 1 AI \'j62 SCALE: AS NOTED SECURITY LIGHTS 6'-8 1/4' -� AND Em PLATE TO TOWER (TYR) } 14 GA. SHEET METAL ENCLOSURE 14 CA 3'x3' REMOVABLE COVER. CENTER OPENING ABOUT TANK PENETRATIONS EXISTING TOWER PORTHOLE 1/4" STAINLESS SELF TAPPING SCREWS ®1'-0" O.C. MAX AROUND OPENING L3x3x1/4 FOR SHEET METAL COVER SUPPORT. DO NOT ATTACH COVER TO SUPP RT H6 0 16" O.C. J• e BROOM FINISH W/ 3/4" CHAMFER EDGE ° • •° e 3/B" DIA E%PANSION � • a EMBED EACH ANGLE) - SECURITY LIGHTS 6'-8 1/4' -� AND Em PLATE TO TOWER (TYR) } 14 GA. SHEET METAL ENCLOSURE 14 CA 3'x3' REMOVABLE COVER. CENTER OPENING ABOUT TANK PENETRATIONS EXISTING TOWER PORTHOLE 1/4" STAINLESS SELF TAPPING SCREWS ®1'-0" O.C. MAX AROUND OPENING L3x3x1/4 FOR SHEET METAL COVER SUPPORT. DO NOT ATTACH COVER TO SUPP RT C CONDUITS THROUGH PAD) RIGHT ELEVATION GRAPHIC SCALE. 6' 3' 0 3' SCALE (11x17): 1" = 6' SCALE (22x34): 1" = 3' BACKER ROD AND SILICON. CAULK JOINT (TOP AND SIDES OF COVER AGAINST WALL) —PL 3/8"x2"x3" LONG. PROVIDE HOLE FOR (1) 3/8' DIA. STAINLESS BOLT EA PLATE. SPACE PLATES 0 V-6' MAX O.C. ALONG VERTICAL SIDES OF COVER !PROVIDE A 1" BREAK ON / SURFACES OF COVER IN CONTACT WITH TOWER FOR BACKER ROD AND SILICON SEALANT BEARING IUJN (TYR)lot N—�'� ANIENNA COAX :NINI\, 1/2" COMPRESSIBLE FILLER (TYR) 1 MIN 14 �• EXISTING TOWER FOUNDATION ( (MAY VARY) UNDISTURBED SOIL BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO .. CH WAY —(4) B' DIA PVC AT LEAST 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 METHOD C. Z\CONDUIT STUB—UP DETAIL SCALE (11x17): 1" = 4'—()" 5. PRELIMINARY PAD DESIGN; SUITABILITY AN FLOATING PAD TO SCALE (11x17); 1" = 6'-0 ( ) BE DETERMINED AFTER GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS. SCALE ) -- NOT TO SCALE SCALE 22x34: 1" = 2'-0" (22x34: 1" = 3'-0" R JOHN' c. No. 040205: 03/04/2020 )G EYE SIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 RAIRVIEW ROAD .ORE. VA.^3837 NPRI Cg V EQUIPMENT DETAILS C6 H6 0 16" O.C. ANGLE FOR EACH SIDE OF BOX ONE FINISH GRADE 3/4" CHAMFER (TYR) (EACH WAY, TOP AND BOTTOM) 3/B" DIA E%PANSION ANCHORS 3" MIN 51 EMBED EACH ANGLE) - \\\'�/ \ \i\ PROPOSED CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE 24 PORT CABtE ENTRY ?INtf !, i \ .. .•, :'\ ,\ \ \\/, (ROxIEC 24.24 Q ENTRY NAND WALLS \' \�\%- : \ IED STONE OR QS? !" e ENTRY DOOR TYP OF !S) NOTOTS SHOWN FOR CLARITY, OMP 6" MIN. CRUSHED STONE OR CTED GRANULAR FILL A -- ANUV.R FILL GEOTEXTILE FABRIC (MIRAFI 500X) WIC FOUNDATION NOTES 2 IC LAYOUT ISOMETRIC VIEW 1. REMOVE ALL LOOSE INORGANIC OR UNSUITABLE SOIL TO3 RETE PAD DETAIL C6 SCALE: AS NOTED (III C6 SCALE: AS NOTED UNDISTURBED BEARING STRATA W/ ALLOWABLE SOLI BEARING PRESSURE OF 2000 PSF. -.=r: .. MIN GRAPHIC S ALF: 2. CONCRETE STRENGTH SHALL BE 4000 PSI, MIN, GRAPHIC SCALE 4' 2' 0 2' 4' 3. SLAB SHALL BE LEVEL f1/4". a THE6' 3' 0 3' 6 84®12" 0 C EACH C CONDUITS THROUGH PAD) RIGHT ELEVATION GRAPHIC SCALE. 6' 3' 0 3' SCALE (11x17): 1" = 6' SCALE (22x34): 1" = 3' BACKER ROD AND SILICON. CAULK JOINT (TOP AND SIDES OF COVER AGAINST WALL) —PL 3/8"x2"x3" LONG. PROVIDE HOLE FOR (1) 3/8' DIA. STAINLESS BOLT EA PLATE. SPACE PLATES 0 V-6' MAX O.C. ALONG VERTICAL SIDES OF COVER !PROVIDE A 1" BREAK ON / SURFACES OF COVER IN CONTACT WITH TOWER FOR BACKER ROD AND SILICON SEALANT BEARING IUJN (TYR)lot N—�'� ANIENNA COAX :NINI\, 1/2" COMPRESSIBLE FILLER (TYR) 1 MIN 14 �• EXISTING TOWER FOUNDATION ( (MAY VARY) UNDISTURBED SOIL BASE SHALL BE COMPACTED TO .. CH WAY —(4) B' DIA PVC AT LEAST 95% MODIFIED PROCTOR MAXIMUM DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 METHOD C. Z\CONDUIT STUB—UP DETAIL SCALE (11x17): 1" = 4'—()" 5. PRELIMINARY PAD DESIGN; SUITABILITY AN FLOATING PAD TO SCALE (11x17); 1" = 6'-0 ( ) BE DETERMINED AFTER GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS. SCALE ) -- NOT TO SCALE SCALE 22x34: 1" = 2'-0" (22x34: 1" = 3'-0" R JOHN' c. No. 040205: 03/04/2020 )G EYE SIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 RAIRVIEW ROAD .ORE. VA.^3837 NPRI Cg V EQUIPMENT DETAILS C6 1 RRH DETAIL \.E72 SALE NTS 2 A.WG THIN OR TW STRANDED GROUND LEAD ATTACHED TO PIPE WITH EXOTHERMIC WELD TO SECTOR GND BAR PIPE (2" TO 4" OD AS PER STRUCTURAL AND/OR MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS) USE ROUND MEMBER ADAPTER AS REQUIRED TO SECURE JUMPERS - (PT# ANDREW -31670-2 OR P APPROVED EQUAL) MOUNTING BRACKET FURNISHED WITH ANTENNA RET MOTOR O AN 1.TENNA ORIENTATION IS BASED ON TRUE NORTH BEARING, GONERAC70R SHALL VERIFY TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO FINAL RF CONFIGURATIONS SHEET FOR ANTENNA AZIMUTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3, DO NOT INSTALL OOWNTILT BRACKET ON FIRSTNET ANTENNAS, 4. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING IN THE FIELD WITH AT&T REPRESENTATIVE, 5. INSTALL SURGE ARRESTORS ON MAIN COAXIAL GABLES. GROUND TO NEAREST GROUND BAR. 6. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS IDENTIFICATION TAG (1 1/2' IN DIAMETER) WITH 1/4" STAMPED LETTERS AND NUMBERS. ONE AT THE ANTENNA PORT CONNECTION NEAR THE END OF THE JUMPER AND ONE ON EACH END OF THE JUMPER SERVING THE RADIO EQUIPMENT, EACH TAG WILL BE STAMPED WITH AT&T AND THE ANTENNA PORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. I.E. TAGS SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF UV RESISTANT WIRE OR CABLE -TY. L4 NANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL C7 SCALE: NTS NO., NNHH-65C-R4 MOTH FIBERGLASS, UV RESISTANT RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY I NOTES: WEIGHT. W/0 MOUNTING KIT 99.2 LBS CONNECTOR_____ WARNING TAPE PRINTED A IALCATEL-LCENT/NOKIA NA AT&T SUPPLIES REMOTE RADIO HEAD (RRHH�A�RRH\ l RRH AND RRHMOUNRNO BRACKET. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY UNISTRUT 6'm PVC L AND INSTALL RRHs AND ALL MOUNTING (TYP. OF z Ell HARDWAREINCLUDING ALU/NOKIA RRH Q WALL MOUNTING BRACKET IF NECESSARY. ALU/NOKIA MAKES CABLE TERMINATIONS. 19.6" 2. DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS ARE FOR RRH 2" GALV. S �QF FRONT WITHOUT MOUNTING BRACKET SIZE AND WEIGHT TABLE FOR ELECTF RRH MODEL HEIGHT WIDTH DEPTH PVC SCHEDULE -4 0 w S ALL RRH 2x4D-07AT x x 24.8"x11.5"x5,7" WEIGHT 52.91 LBS SIZE AS SHOWN ON DWC e E ALU B25 RRH 400-41R 212"x11.97"x7.18' 52.9 LBS TELCO CONDUIT g PVC SCHEOULE-40 ALU RRH 4x25-WCS-4R31.5'x12.0"x8.7" 31.5 LBS SIZE AS SHOWN ON DWG igA ALU 866A RRH4x45-4R 25.8"x1 l.g"x7.2" 52.9 LBS NORIA4i4R 812/14 32OW AHLBA 26.7"x12,4"x7.4" 99.2 LBS NORIA 4i 4H 825/fi 6 320W AHFIB 26.7"x12.8'.6,33"____ NOKIA 4T,,, 65 1fi0W AHCA 13.2'x1 1. x64" _88.18 _LBS 15ji3l LRS NORIA 414R 830 I- AHNA 16.83".12.40'x6.3 39.02 LBS CLEARANCE TABLE CLEARANCE REDO FRONT 36' FOR INSTALUTION ACCESS REAR 2 0' WITH SUPPLIED MOUNTING BRACKETS RICHT 4" FOR AIR FLOW LEFT 4" FOR AIR FLOW TOP 12 FOR AIR FLOW BOTTOM 12 FOR CONDUIT ROUTING 1 RRH DETAIL \.E72 SALE NTS 2 A.WG THIN OR TW STRANDED GROUND LEAD ATTACHED TO PIPE WITH EXOTHERMIC WELD TO SECTOR GND BAR PIPE (2" TO 4" OD AS PER STRUCTURAL AND/OR MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS) USE ROUND MEMBER ADAPTER AS REQUIRED TO SECURE JUMPERS - (PT# ANDREW -31670-2 OR P APPROVED EQUAL) MOUNTING BRACKET FURNISHED WITH ANTENNA RET MOTOR O AN 1.TENNA ORIENTATION IS BASED ON TRUE NORTH BEARING, GONERAC70R SHALL VERIFY TRUE NORTH PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO FINAL RF CONFIGURATIONS SHEET FOR ANTENNA AZIMUTHS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3, DO NOT INSTALL OOWNTILT BRACKET ON FIRSTNET ANTENNAS, 4. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE COLOR CODING IN THE FIELD WITH AT&T REPRESENTATIVE, 5. INSTALL SURGE ARRESTORS ON MAIN COAXIAL GABLES. GROUND TO NEAREST GROUND BAR. 6. SUB CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A BRASS IDENTIFICATION TAG (1 1/2' IN DIAMETER) WITH 1/4" STAMPED LETTERS AND NUMBERS. ONE AT THE ANTENNA PORT CONNECTION NEAR THE END OF THE JUMPER AND ONE ON EACH END OF THE JUMPER SERVING THE RADIO EQUIPMENT, EACH TAG WILL BE STAMPED WITH AT&T AND THE ANTENNA PORT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER. I.E. TAGS SHALL BE ATTACHED WITH CORROSION PROOF UV RESISTANT WIRE OR CABLE -TY. L4 NANTENNA MOUNTING DETAIL C7 SCALE: NTS COMMSCOPE MODEL NO., NNHH-65C-R4 RADOMEMATERIAL: FIBERGLASS, UV RESISTANT RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY DIMENSIONS, HxWxO: 6"W. METAL CORE, UNDER WEIGHT. W/0 MOUNTING KIT 99.2 LBS CONNECTOR_____ WARNING TAPE PRINTED A 'CAUTION BURIED UTILITY o L 07 SCALE: NTS 6'm PVC L (TYP. OF z Ell WASHED S Q COMPACTE 19.6" 2" GALV. S �QF FRONT DEAD BOTTOM FOR ELECTF COMMSCOPE MODEL NO., NNHH-65C-R4 RADOMEMATERIAL: FIBERGLASS, UV RESISTANT RADOME COLOR: LIGHT GRAY DIMENSIONS, HxWxO: 96Q%I9l3%T8" WEIGHT. W/0 MOUNTING KIT 99.2 LBS CONNECTOR_____ (8) 4.3-10 FEMALE 2 \ ANTFNNA DETAIL o L 07 SCALE: NTS 'IPF. MOUNTING BRACKET RAYCAP MODFLNOo: DC9-48-60-24-8C-EV PROVIDES FIBER CONNECTIONS FOR UP TO 24 PAIR FIBER (LC -LC SINGLE MODE) AND PROTECTION FOR NINE (9) INDIVIDUAL -48VDC CIRCUITS (N12 TO p4 AWG) CEO 0: CE0.21427 WEIGHT (W/0 MOUNT)' 16.0 LBS WEIGHT (W/ MOIINTl' 26.2 LBS /_5 NNNRAYCAP DC9 FIBER/DC DFMARC DOME DETAI N_S.7j SCALE: NTS MATCH EXISTING SURFACE NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE LONG RADIUS BENDS. (24" RADIUS MIN. OR GREATER AS REQUIRED TO SNAKE CABLE CONDUIT THROUGH CONDUIT) 2. ALL PIPE TRENCHES TO BE HAND EXCAVATED AND BACKFILLED TO ENSURE THAT EXISTING CONDUIT AND PIPING ARE NOT DISTURBED. CONTRACTOR TO MAKE ALL PVC JOINTS WATERTIGHT, = PRIOR TO BACKFILLING. 30UNDERGROUND -CONDUIT DETAIL \C7 SCALE: NTS 00 J CL V ' cc 'Z LuLua LL Z ZZm LLJ 1 A_ TH R J01 No. 0402 0:po _ cncw.d �y- EQUIPMENT DETAILS 6 COMPOUND TRENCHIN . OFTAI CT 07 SCALE: NTS I--1FROG EYE SIRBAUGh WARNING TAPE (1 TYR.) SITE ID: 4124 -1 FA # 10138153 -COMPACTED BACK FILL TO 95% MODIFIED 141 FMR IEWzROAD o L PROCTOR DENSITY PER ASTM D 1557 oared Ell z Ell !' UNDISTURBED n _ -COMPACTED SAND :E� c g - POWER CONDUIT ® s p PVC SCHEDULE -4 0 w S SIZE AS SHOWN ON DWC e E - TELCO CONDUIT g PVC SCHEOULE-40 SIZE AS SHOWN ON DWG igA EQUIPMENT DETAILS 6 COMPOUND TRENCHIN . OFTAI CT 07 SCALE: NTS R4R2 """'I R441 [R17.4'] ///---NONLATCHINC DOOR Lq TCHINC DOOR _ (1 PLACE) (2 PLACES) P1R FILTER 6 AIR /FUEL FUEL RESTRICTION INDICATOR �\ SUPPLY RETURN 231 0 [91'] ER OVALL HEIGHT R02 31.6"] 1 417.45 [0.690 MOUNTING HOLES (8 PLACES) x-110 [4.3'] ilP 21 [122 120 _ ., 114 LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION BOX (NOTE 8) .. ...••.777 :; PRIMARY C3 C NNECTON 'a, In 6' BOX OPENING A TANN IRIMABI MU UP ARE sLTUO-1ZREA dErrrTrir_ --[299- LOW VOLTAGE CUOTOMEXR- TANK Si -UP AREA (NOT 6) H DISC -GE N REAR (NOTE 0) CONTROL PANEL INCITE III 11 ' �- N go ON X CONNECT L1- NOTE 8) MAIN LINE CIRCUIT DIS..AFIE B 1'1`1 BREAKER 11LC 9) DUCT IIS ��il ■(NOTE 15) '�I F_ LOW S' 36 le , 11H TANK ICHi 914 [3; MOUNTING HOLES 18 T[YP'7" 950 [37.4'] TANK WIDTH I__ 1268 [49.9'] AR VI CENTER OF GRAUTv 2692 LENGTH [NG1. TANK 'll 7C LOAD LEAD CONDUIT ARE 2) C , 'n 20/24C VAC FROM UTILITY � B�� R - FUEL FILL7 fid � ..�C�jIVIEW AREA DETAIL COMMUNICATIONS AND 2".1' START RLIU-bM BE RUN IN W 1 -- 1 JFUEL (SHOWN WITH DOORS RE.OVED) SEPIJ 0 SEE N07 1S) ENGINE BLOCK HEAT -R NOTE 2) [17 372 X S7 231 0 [91'] ER OVALL HEIGHT R02 31.6"] 1 417.45 [0.690 MOUNTING HOLES (8 PLACES) x-110 [4.3'] ilP 21 [122 120 _ ., 114 LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION BOX (NOTE 8) .. ...••.777 :; PRIMARY C3 C NNECTON 'a, In 6' BOX OPENING A TANN IRIMABI MU UP ARE sLTUO-1ZREA dErrrTrir_ --[299- LOW VOLTAGE CUOTOMEXR- TANK Si -UP AREA (NOT 6) H DISC -GE N REAR (NOTE 0) CONTROL PANEL INCITE III 11 ' �- N go ON X CONNECT L1- NOTE 8) MAIN LINE CIRCUIT DIS..AFIE B 1'1`1 BREAKER 11LC 9) DUCT IIS ��il ■(NOTE 15) '�I F_ LOW S' 36 le , 11H TANK ICHi 914 [3; MOUNTING HOLES 18 T[YP'7" 950 [37.4'] TANK WIDTH I__ 1268 [49.9'] AR VI CENTER OF GRAUTv 2692 LENGTH [NG1. TANK 0 7C LOAD LEAD CONDUIT ARE 2) C , 'n 20/24C VAC FROM UTILITY FvJ1) ISLAND PLATE INCLUDED) fid TRANSFER S­H/� CD MUNICATION CONDUITS a-: COMMUNICATIONS AND 2".1' START RLIU-bM BE RUN IN s•:'•; -- 1 JFUEL (SHOWN WITH DOORS RE.OVED) SEPIJ 0 ER GIDE V•E`u 1CCONTROL PANEL INCLUDES BATTERY CHARGER WIN THREE PRONG CORD 2. 150OW 120VAC ENGINE BLOCK HEATER WI 1TH THREE PRONG CORD 3. 2 VOLT NEGATIVE GROUND SYSTEM ,fNERAD 120/240V 10 3W 30KW DIS C NFRg70R W/ 1 0 2ALLQIELTANK 4, GENERATOR MUST BE GROUNDED MODE NO D030 NEO 20230 5. CENTER of GRANT' 4 WEIGHT MAY SHIFT SLIGHTLY DUE TO UNIT OPTIONS S. STUB -UPS: ( ) 7. HIGH VOLTAGES STUB-UPTANK RAREA RP AREA NUDE$ THE AC LOAD LEAD L STUB -UIS TO BE IN TCONNHE ECTION p THE MAIN TANK ULINE CIRCUIT BREAKER, THE NEUTRAL CONNECTION, AND AUXILIARY 120/240V CONNECTION WEGHI DATA (IN Ip c MPTP F TANK1 R. CONNECTION POINTS FOR CONTROL WIRES. 8070M OF LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION BO% HAS KNOCKOUL$ FOR 1/2' ANp 3/4' CONDUT F17INGS 9. MUST ALLOW FREE FLOW OF DISCHARGE AIR AND EXHAUST. SEE SPEC SHEET FOR MINIMUM AIR FLOW AND MAXIMUM RESTRICTION ROUIREMENTS GENERATOR: 14p9KC (3106 LB$) 10. MUST ALLG'N FREE ROW CF H -E AIR. SEE SPEC SHEET FOR MINIMUM AIR FLOW AND MAXIMUM RESTRICTION PEOUIREMENTS GENERATOR WIN WOODEN SHIPPING SKIDS: 1474KG (3250 LBS) 11. GENERATOR MUST BE INSTALLED SUCH TENT FRESH COOLING AIR IS AVAILABLE AND THAT DISCHARGE AIR FROM THE RADIATOR IS NOT RECIRCULATED 12. RIS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION TECHNICIAN TO ENSURE THAT THE GENERATOR INSTALIAlION COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, .0 REGULATIONS 13, IBD GALLON USEABLE %ACITY WSETANK IS INCLUDED WITH GENERATOR 14, UNIT IS SHIPPED WITH FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES 015 0NNECTED AND PLUGGED BETWEEN ENGINE AND FUEL TANK. THIS HAS BEEN DONE TO FACILITATE PRESSURE TESTING OF THE TANK IN THE FIELD. FOR INFORMATION REGARDING CONNECTING THE FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES PRIOR TO START UP, SEE THE FUEL TANK FIELD TESTING PROCEDURE (OE5GR2) $VPPLIED IN THE TANK LOOSE VENTS Kli, WHICH I$ SHIPPED WITH THIS GENERATOR. 15. SEE GENAL 2 DRAWING UC3650 FOR DISCHARGE DUCT REMOVty, REMOVAL OF DUCT WILL PROVIDE ACCESS TO MUFFLER FOR SERVICING. 16. ADDITIONAL 2' FEMALE NPT PORT$ - PLUGGED OR EOUIPPED WITH TOP -MOUNT SWITCHES DEPENDING ON UNIT OPTIONS. DIESEL\DIESE�G�NERATO C8 SCALE: NTS 7C LOAD LEAD CONDUIT ARE 2) C , 'n 20/24C VAC FROM UTILITY FvJ1) ISLAND PLATE INCLUDED) fid TRANSFER S­H/� CD MUNICATION CONDUITS a-: COMMUNICATIONS AND 2".1' START RLIU-bM BE RUN IN s•:'•; (SEE NOTE 6) ••..••. ER GIDE V•E`u 1CCONTROL PANEL INCLUDES BATTERY CHARGER WIN THREE PRONG CORD 2. 150OW 120VAC ENGINE BLOCK HEATER WI 1TH THREE PRONG CORD 3. 2 VOLT NEGATIVE GROUND SYSTEM ,fNERAD 120/240V 10 3W 30KW DIS C NFRg70R W/ 1 0 2ALLQIELTANK 4, GENERATOR MUST BE GROUNDED MODE NO D030 NEO 20230 5. CENTER of GRANT' 4 WEIGHT MAY SHIFT SLIGHTLY DUE TO UNIT OPTIONS S. STUB -UPS: ( ) 7. HIGH VOLTAGES STUB-UPTANK RAREA RP AREA NUDE$ THE AC LOAD LEAD L STUB -UIS TO BE IN TCONNHE ECTION p THE MAIN TANK ULINE CIRCUIT BREAKER, THE NEUTRAL CONNECTION, AND AUXILIARY 120/240V CONNECTION WEGHI DATA (IN Ip c MPTP F TANK1 R. CONNECTION POINTS FOR CONTROL WIRES. 8070M OF LOW VOLTAGE CUSTOMER CONNECTION BO% HAS KNOCKOUL$ FOR 1/2' ANp 3/4' CONDUT F17INGS 9. MUST ALLOW FREE FLOW OF DISCHARGE AIR AND EXHAUST. SEE SPEC SHEET FOR MINIMUM AIR FLOW AND MAXIMUM RESTRICTION ROUIREMENTS GENERATOR: 14p9KC (3106 LB$) 10. MUST ALLG'N FREE ROW CF H -E AIR. SEE SPEC SHEET FOR MINIMUM AIR FLOW AND MAXIMUM RESTRICTION PEOUIREMENTS GENERATOR WIN WOODEN SHIPPING SKIDS: 1474KG (3250 LBS) 11. GENERATOR MUST BE INSTALLED SUCH TENT FRESH COOLING AIR IS AVAILABLE AND THAT DISCHARGE AIR FROM THE RADIATOR IS NOT RECIRCULATED 12. RIS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE INSTALLATION TECHNICIAN TO ENSURE THAT THE GENERATOR INSTALIAlION COMPLIES WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, STANDARDS, .0 REGULATIONS 13, IBD GALLON USEABLE %ACITY WSETANK IS INCLUDED WITH GENERATOR 14, UNIT IS SHIPPED WITH FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES 015 0NNECTED AND PLUGGED BETWEEN ENGINE AND FUEL TANK. THIS HAS BEEN DONE TO FACILITATE PRESSURE TESTING OF THE TANK IN THE FIELD. FOR INFORMATION REGARDING CONNECTING THE FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN LINES PRIOR TO START UP, SEE THE FUEL TANK FIELD TESTING PROCEDURE (OE5GR2) $VPPLIED IN THE TANK LOOSE VENTS Kli, WHICH I$ SHIPPED WITH THIS GENERATOR. 15. SEE GENAL 2 DRAWING UC3650 FOR DISCHARGE DUCT REMOVty, REMOVAL OF DUCT WILL PROVIDE ACCESS TO MUFFLER FOR SERVICING. 16. ADDITIONAL 2' FEMALE NPT PORT$ - PLUGGED OR EOUIPPED WITH TOP -MOUNT SWITCHES DEPENDING ON UNIT OPTIONS. DIESEL\DIESE�G�NERATO C8 SCALE: NTS DC9 FIBER CONNECTIONS DC9 OC POWER CONNECTIONS 2 2 —02 � —<2 y .r 2 'n 2 k=•• 2 'u�• 2 1i 2 2 2 2 r +' 2 3 W=,:.: 2. • 2 2 2 r� U <_ 2 -'- 2 ate'- 2 FI R INPUT FIBER PORT RRH CONNECTION 2 „•,.+-. ..�..�,a 2 -•�-; ! 2 �.� ..-� _ �_ 2 � . 2 2 2 > p 2 p c 2 yy 2 2 > 2 2 ;S 2 2 yl 2 2 2 p 2 2 S a FIBER r 1! a E �� -.._u3 z..�.,.«: r....x•..,.v+ti n�-..,._rs.+.+.,,,,v ,.,,.w,-a.s..,.,.,,,� WCS/830/2300 F TUR y tl 4r�._O NEC .. '.� .•+-� NEC 7 + .,.u• 9 POS G, .�.ei:..�.. �j_-....,....0 _N'J POS Ov:�.-�var� 0, j iY° BS 650_ LTE & 51C yFUTURE H - _. J MEGC NEG P . O t -4.) V e ..��`..•. ,. POS Ci • �.2� �i9O'`+J' POS G'-�.-sew: ii`r (Yt y F i RE ii i �-U a FUTURE �.As J f —�/�����— N�E�G 11�lsr_� l NEG R A `v `{J POS �z�.. :N..«.•.,� POS '..�-.� IF EIR5TNET/614/700 AND a, FUTUR N R :.sr-�•.. NEG G��.._ w...r.- s. NEG O 1 -� - 4 O PO•1']- '} AWS/866/2100 AN p i PCS/825/1900 �� p pp ? i ,} 2 CONNECT SHIELD 1� GRAIN II WIRE & CABLE GND WIRE TO OR UND BAR OROU y R UND (NOTE 2) (TYP) BAR BAR OC POWER DC POWER M 6/C DC TRUNK. a IS CABLES MAX OR I 2 PCS/825/1900 3 AWS/866(2100 4 WCS/830/2300 5 FIRSTNET/674/700 6 85/850 T B5/850 - 5G 8 FUTURE 9 FUTURE 10 FUTURE 11 FUTURE{ 12 FUTURE 13 FUTURE 14 FUTURE 15 FUTURE --512/700 16 FUTURE I7 FUTURE IS FUTURE 19 FUTURE 20 FUTURE 21 FUTURE 22 FUTURE 23 FUTURE 24 FUTURE OUTPUT INPUT OUTPUT 24PR FIBER CABLE 2PR SINGLE MODE FIBER, OUTDOOR RATED, FOR FINAL RRH M 6/C DC TRUNK. a IS CABLES MAX OR I = �' b2 GREEN, STRANDED INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR CONNECTION (ttP PER RRH) Ejf A AS Ott ON PLANS) (ROUTED TO NEAREST BUSSBAR) 4 II�I Ta� ----2/G DC POWER CABLE, OUTDOOR RATED, FOR NOTES: FINAL RRH CONNECTION 1. TRUNK GLAND KITS: (TYR PFR RRH) • TRUNK CLAN' KIT A: OVAL GASKET FOR #4 AND B'6AWG TRUNK (CEO. 21428) • TRUNK GLAND KIT B'. OVAL GASKET FOR (2) " AWC TRUNKS (CEO. 21429) • TRUNK CLAND KIT C: OVAL CASKET FOR (2) d8 AWG TRUNKS (CEO. 21434) 2. WHEN SHIELDED CABLE IS USED CONNECT CABLE SHIELD DRAIN WIRE AND GROUND WIRE TO GROUND BAR. 3. FIRST SQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND (OR FIRST INSTALLED) RRH ON ALPHA SECTOR. IN THE EVENT THE ALARM CABLE CANNOT BE CONNECTED TO ALPHA IT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE TO ALARM TO THE PHYSICAL SECTOR ON AN EXCEPTION BASIS. CLOSEST 4, 2NDSQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND (OR FIRST INSTALLED) RRH ON BETA SECTOR, 4, SROSQUID INSTALLED WILL BE ALARMED TO THE LOWEST BAND (OR FIRST INSTALLED) RRH ON GAMMA SECTOR. 5. AN RRH WILL NEVER HAVE MORE THAN ONE SQUID ALARMED ON IT. 6. SQUID ALARMS ARE NOT TO BE DAISY CHAINED. O2 = LC CONNECTOR O= STRIKESORB PROTECTION 7 RAY AP DC9 FIBER/nC, nFMARC DOM nEreu MODULE BY PAYCAP C8 SCALE: NTS 000 a V " z2H Lu z3o — IL H ISEPH R JOID ic. No. 04020; 03/04/2020 )G EYE SIRBAL SITE ID: 4124 FA #10138153 14GORE VIGW2��9D C DC9 WIRING DIAGRAM mvnna rvomcer 109 �Y k 3/4' CRUSHED STONE ASTM C33 512E N0. £/ \ '- GRADE TO DRAIN S n� lEml.w. -MARAFI 5DOX GROUND STABILIZA11ON FABRIC PLACED ON COMPACTED SUBGRADE 1"NSECTION THROUGH COMPOUND \::j NOT TO SCALE OF CRUSHED CURI'ACE IE TO DRAIN AWAY TOWER YARD NOTES. -USE OF SWALES AND/OR DRAINAGE DITCHES FOR PROPER WATER RUNOFF AS NEEDED. -AGGREGATE IS BASED ON STANDARD PASHTO. -PIPE SHALL BE AT A MINIMUM OF 4' LONGER THEN ACCESS 2 TO 1 SLOPE MAINTAIN TO BOTTOM OF ROAD WIDTH ON EACH SIDE FOR PROPER SHOULDERING DITCHLINE / FLOWUNE AND ON OPPOSITE . -ALL CROSSDRAINS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON A 45' ANGLE SLOPE MATCH EXISTING SLOPE. DITCHES SHALL HAVE A V (FOOT) FLAT BOTTOM W"WITH THE FALL OF THE GRADE, RIP RAP INSTALLED IN HEAVY EROSION AREA. 10•-0' r (TYPICAL) SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE 1/4' PER FOOT 2:1 SLOPE 180° 180° WIND f WIND GUYING PATTERN FOR DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DECIDUOUS TREE STANDARD WATERPROOF TREE WRAP (DECIDUOUS TREES ONLY) TO 2ND BRANCH 3" OR WIDER NYLON WEBBING W/ METAL GROMMETS 12 GA. GALV. STEEL WIRE, DO NOT PULL TAUT. 5LONG STAKES, 2" x 2" OR 2 1/2 DIAM. WOOD, OR STEEL T -POSTS, TWO PER TREE (DECIDUOUS TREES) SPECIFIED BACKFILL COMPACTED SUBGRADE TCLASS I-1i '16AGGREGATE BASE COURSECOMPACTED SELECT COMPACTED SUBGRADE, MIN. OF y' OF ROAD BASE COURSE jJ61O FREE FROM TOPSOIL TOTAL n 9 THICK FILL WHERE REQUIRED ANO ORGANICS 4 GEOTEXTILE MATERIAL "MIRAFI-500X" (OR EOVAL) DRIVEWAY SECTION - CROWNED NOT TO SCALE 6" 1ao° 1zo°1zo° WIND f WIND FOR TREES ON 4:1 OR STEEPER SLOPES• PLACE 2 GUYS UPSLOPE, ONE DOWNSLOPE: OTHERWISE PLACE FOR PREVAILING WIND. GUYING PATTERN OREEVrIcFIN TREE PLANTING -EVERGREEN TREE \ -PRUNE ONLY DEAD OR DAMAGED\ WbOD, DO NOT PRUNE � FLUSH TO BRANCH. LEAVE SLIGHT STUB. : U X 12 GA: C,ALV. STEEL GUY WREN j _ ATTACH TO 24" MIN. STEEL � T -POST OR REBAR STAKE., 3 Pw QA TREE. DO NOT PULL TAUT. / t �e -FLEX-PIPE BARK PROTECTOR -SET FOOTBALL 2"-4" ABOVE FINAL GRADE. REMOVE ENTIRE WIRE BASKET BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF FOOTBALL AND ANY TWNE OR WIRE. WHITE PVC AROUND WIRE TO MARK - AND PREVENT PEOPLE FROM TRIPPING OVER WIRE. -4" DEPTH WOOD CHIP MULCH -6" HIGH SAUCER AROUND PLANT - 24" MIN. STEEL T -POST OR #4 REBAR STAKE, FLUSH W/ GRADE, THREE PER TREE (EVERGREEN TREES) M N.� " I ROOTBALL . 1 � ROOTBALL ROOTBALL DIA. DIA. DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING AND GUYING DETAIL (GUY AND STAKE DECIDUOUS TREES 2" AND LARGER CALIPER AND CONIFEROUS TREES OVER 4' HT.) NOT TO SCALE ��TREE STAKING AND GUYING DETAIL -- NOT TO SCALE A_ No. 0402053459 03/04/2020 Pm.d- FROG EYE SIRBAUGH SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 .a� cmawpwzaoaD OORE,V : 63] E�2w< "dLL CIVIL DETAILS CIO 2' MESH 9 GALV. W/ COLORED SLATS (TYR HEAVY PRESSED STEEL BARBEDI6 -� _ _i 6'-0" WIRE OUT RIGGER ARM ___\ '�I . _ 10'-0" (MAX) 6" MIN 3/4" CRUSHED STONE (i0 BE E%TENDED ONE FOOT OUTSIDE OF FENCING) HEAVYE DUTY GALV L0E DOUBLE GATE LATCH W CONTRACTOR FURNISHEI I" GAP BETWEEN FINISH GRADE 3/8" DIA TRUSS ROD WITH TURNBUCKLE AT GATE ONLY AND BOTTOM GATE RAIL 6' DIAM. BY 18" DEEP CONC. FOOTING WITH 1-1/4" PIPE SLEEVE, 6" L _DOUBLE SWING ACCESS GATE DETAIL - SCALE. N.i.S. 2' MESH 9 GAL V. W/ COLORED SLATS (TYP.) BARBED WIRE �- TOP BRACE RAIL STRETCHER BAR DIAGONAL RO STEELL TURNBDUCK E / 1ENSON WIRE I� T F MAX CLEARANCE FROM FEN i' CE TO GRADE CHAIN LINK FENCE DETAIL SCALE', N, T.S. 3 STRANDS OF 4 -POINT BARBED WRE 9�i 3/16' x 3/4" STRETCHER BAR AT CORNER AND GATE POSTS DIAGONAL. ROD w/ STEEL TURNBUCKLE M7 GA. TENSION WIRE. CONTINUOUS 1' GROWN FOR DRAINAGE DRILLED PIER FOUNDATION -NO CAP BETWEEN FINISH GRADE AND FENCE FABRIC MIRAFI 500% GEOTECH FABRIC, OR APPROVED EOUAL UNDER ROCK PROPOSED UnUIY BACYBOARD W/ PROPOSED120/210Y, 10 6 GANG AIf1ER STACK (SNENANDOAH VALLEY RECTRIC COOP) (BY OTHERS) W/PROPOSED 120/240V, IP, O200A Ar&r NfiER AND N.C.S. v 7NTECRIC 2" GEN PLUG O O T&T ATdr IC W/ ARS ANO Aly O O M PAAN AND INTECRA( PANEL Ar&Y r1 (PARr OF 57M WAC) E 7 PROPOSED JOAW DIESEL GENERA/OR ON 190 GALLON rANK (GENERAL/AW 1202J0) PROPOSED AT&T 6'-S 1/4'X 6'-8 1/4' STEEL MC (NEO 120060) H- PROPOSED BY OTHERS T-T-1T-T$T-T (LEC) 2 CONDUIT SCFHu_llLK NOTES K DESCRIPTON 1. MULTIPLE KEY CHART CALLOUTS REPRESENT MULTIPLE INSTALLATIONS OF 1 2' L17A'WR W/ J1J/Of 1140 (FROM ME7ER TO PiLC) CONDUIT AND CONDUCTORS. 2. WIC PRE -PLUMBED FOR AC POWER AND DC POWER CONNECTIONS. SEE 2 2' CONDUR W/ 500/ PLO15lReMr (fRLW TELa9 DEM4A1;' >D WC) MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR CONDUCTORS, RACEWAYS, LIGHT LAYOUT, J Z' CONDUIT W/ J%J/O:IJ2C (FROM OENER41O4 TO PILL) SMOKE DETECTOR LAYOUT, k EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. 3. INSTALL (12) 12V, IBOAH BATTERIES (MARATHON MIV180FT, NEO 4 J' CONCUR W/ 4110+2180 (FROM PRC nO GEAER47OR iASm & BInERY OWROCR) #15171) CONFIGURED IN (3) BATTERY STRINGS 0 -48VOC NOMINAL FOR 5 1' OTVDUR W/ ARIL77O7AOUC7OR CIBI (,O4 OENTTERY IDR GONMOL) APPROX. 4.25 HIRS BACKUP TIME 6 i' CLiVDUR B PAIR (NM) 124 ALAW C49 ES AND NYLCIN PULL LME (FOR GEN ALARMS) d. pCTNATE% NSTALL (8) -48y BVDC 2000W RECTIFIERS (EMERSON ESURE) (NED #15930) IN POWER PUNT FOR N+1 5. CONDUIT TYPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 120/240V • UNDERGROUND CONDUITS: SCH. 40 PVC CONDUIT, SCH. 80 BENEATH VA CMC -6 -KR POSH ROAD/PARKING LOT. L2 EXTERIOR ABOVE GROUND CONDUITS: RGS INTERIOR CONDUITS: INC PA "'L CAPACTTY(EVA.' A8.0 PANEL LOAD X1.25 (KVA 22.6 2SG 1. WIC PRE -PLUMBED FOR AC POWER AND DC POWER CONNECTIONS. SEE MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT LAYOUT, SMOKE DETECTOR LAYOUT, AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. 2 \PANFL SCHEDULE \fj SCALE: NTS PANEL'AT&T 120840 VOLTS, 1 PHASE, 3VVIRE, AOA MAIN BREAKER RATING (A), 200 120/240V DESCRIPTION VA CMC -6 -KR POSH L1 L2 FOSN TKR C/ VA ❑ES Ca IPTION RECTIFIER 1 E 2 1050 C 30 1 1450 2 _ NC SO 0 _ FUTURE RECTIFIER 1450 C 3 1450 4 NC 0 21 & M RECTIFIER 38 d 1450 C 6 14E0 8 SO NC 0 FUTURE RECTIFIER 1450 C 7 7450 B NC 0 23 b 24 RECTIFIER 5E6 1450 C 30 9 1450 10 9 SPACE 1450 C 71 1450 12 S SPACE RECTIFIER 788 1450 C 30 13 1450 it S SPACE 145C C 15 14M 16 S SPACE FUTURE REC17FER 0 NC 17 0 18 T SPACE Td 10 p NO 30 -18 0 20 6 SPACE FUTURE RECITIFER 0 INC 30 2122 S SPACE 11 d 12 0 NC 23 IS. 24 NC 1920 FUTURE RECITIFER 0 NC 25 1920 26 A NC 1920 HVAC 13& 14 0 NC 27 500 28 20 NC 500 LIGHTS FUTURE RECITIFER D NO 26 SO 760 30 20 NC 750 GENERATOR HEATER 15E 18 0 NC 91 750 32 A NC 7SD OEN BATT CHARGER FUTURERECITIFER 0 NC 33 500 34 20 NC 000 PP BATTERY HEATER 177 b 1B 0 NC 35 250 36 A NC2SO PP GFCI FUTURE RECITIFER 0 NC 37 30 500 38 20 NC 500 BATTERY CAB GFCI tB & A 0 NC 38 S00 b 20 NC 500I BATTERY HEATER 1 SPACE S 41 800I BATTERY HEATER 2 PHASE TOTALS (VA): 9870 9720 CURRENT PER PHASE (A): 83.1 81.0 PANEL TOTAL (VAX I 19&80 PA "'L CAPACTTY(EVA.' A8.0 PANEL LOAD X1.25 (KVA 22.6 2SG 1. WIC PRE -PLUMBED FOR AC POWER AND DC POWER CONNECTIONS. SEE MANUFACTURER DRAWINGS FOR LIGHT LAYOUT, SMOKE DETECTOR LAYOUT, AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT. 2 \PANFL SCHEDULE \fj SCALE: NTS /_l�C POWER BR K R SCHEDUI BY SCALE: NTS ROW #1 (SEE NOTE1) I CONNECTOR END 0� •.1 1" OR LESS FROM ©0 CONNECTOR END I' —46V DC = BLUE MARKINGS OC RETURN = NO ON FIF FUSE PANEL #2—B _©0 III' e 00 TRANSPORT NID HVAC CONT LER /_l�C POWER BR K R SCHEDUI BY SCALE: NTS DISTRIBUTION ROW 02 (SEE NOTE1) I CONNECTOR END 0� •.1 1" OR LESS FROM +24V DC = RED MARKINGS CONNECTOR END I' —46V DC = BLUE MARKINGS OC RETURN = NO ON 850 )A III' e 00 /_l�C POWER BR K R SCHEDUI BY SCALE: NTS VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 2" OR LESS FROM (SEE NOTE 1) 2" CONNECTOR ENO CLEAR HEAT SHRINK TUBING 2" OR LESS FROM +24V DC = RED MARKINGS CONNECTOR NO 2' —48V DC = BLUE MARKINGS NO MARKINGS AWG AND LARCFR DO POWER Ye VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 1" OR LESS FROM (SEE NOTE1) I CONNECTOR END 0� •.1 1" OR LESS FROM +24V DC = RED MARKINGS CONNECTOR END I' —46V DC = BLUE MARKINGS OC RETURN = NO ON ®0 VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 2" OR LESS FROM (SEE NOTE 1) 2" CONNECTOR ENO CLEAR HEAT SHRINK TUBING 2" OR LESS FROM +24V DC = RED MARKINGS CONNECTOR NO 2' —48V DC = BLUE MARKINGS NO MARKINGS AWG AND LARCFR DO POWER Ye VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION 1" OR LESS FROM (SEE NOTE1) I CONNECTOR END f! CLEAR HEAT SHRINK TUBING 1" OR LESS FROM +24V DC = RED MARKINGS CONNECTOR END I' —46V DC = BLUE MARKINGS OC RETURN = NO ON 10AWG AND SMALLER DC POWER CA NOTES, VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION WIRES SHALL BE APPLIED TO BOTH ENDS OF ALL NEW DC POWER WIRING USING UL224 VW—I FLAME RETARDANT UL LISTED THIN WALL HEAT SHRINK TUBING OF APPROPRIATE COLOR. ALTERNATIVELY IT SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE TO APPLY VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS TO DC WIRING WITH APPROPRIATELY COLORED ELECTRICAL TAPE THAT SHALL BE APPLIED IN TWO HALF—LAPPED LAYERS WITH THE FINAL TWO WRAPS APPLIED FULLY OVERLAPPING WITHOUT TENSION, WHENEVER POSSIBLE THE ELECTRICAL TAPE VOLTAGE IDENTIFICATION MARKINGS SHALL BE FULLY COVERED WITH CLEAR UL224 VW—I FLAME RETARDANT UL LISTED THIN WALL HEAT SHRINK TUBING TO PREVENT UNWINDING OR MOVEMENT OF THE ELECTRICAL TAPE DESIGNATIONS. AT&T COMPLIANT THIN WALL CLEAR OR COLORIZED HEAT SHRINK IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL DC POWER WIRING SIZES FROM RURNDY (HSC- FR & HS—FR) AND THOMAS & BETTS (CPO SERIES). OTHER MANUFACTURER HEAT SHRINK SHALL BE ACCEPTABLE ONLY IF IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH SPECIFICATION PROVIDED ABOVE. DESIGNATION TAGS SHALL BE AFFIXED TO BOTH CABLE ENDS AS SPECIFIED IN AT&T DOCUMENT ATT—TP-76300, SECTION L. / z \L)C PjQAER,.WlRlNQ ID NTIFI ATION DETAIL E2 SCALE: NTS ALPHA SECTOR aG AWG DC F CABLES PER RRH PER SECTOR) 2) D. LABEL SHALL BE IR, FREQUENCY BAND AND O. SEEDETAILS FOR DC9 INTERNAL WIRING. 4'. THE BARE WIRE OF EACH MULTI—CONDUCTOR CABLE PND DRAIN WIRE WHEN A SHIELDED CABLE IS USED. SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE EOUIPMENT CABINET GROUND BAR. 5. SEE All. BLOCK ASSIGNMENT DETAIL FOR ALARM CABLE CONNECTIONS. iRRH C WIRING DIAGRAM B. ROUTE Pow ER AND FIBER JUMPERS IN Ih' FLEX CONDUIT FROM DCS TO SLACK BOXES TO RRHs. 7. SECURE DC POWER CABLES WITH HOSE CLA PS AND FIBER TRUNK CABLES WITH VELCRO WRAP TIES ONLY. BD SCALE: NTS 1. LABEL GEN PLUG W/ PHENOLIC NAMEPLATE 'AT&T 120/24OV, 4 200A' 2. CONDUIT TYPES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: •• BELOW GRADE CONDUITS: SCH. 40 PVC CONDUIT, SCH. 80 BENEATH ROAD/PARKING LOT. EXTERIOR ABOVE GRADE CONDUITS: RGS •• INTERIOR CONDUITS: IMC CONDUIT SCHEDD DESCRIPTION r 2' cbrFOLvr w/ a/J/o+r/tc (rRDu ,vETEB ro Prtc) 2 Y COVOO7 w/ SON PULLSTRMG (FROM TELCOG DIEWW TO On) J 2' CO 7 w/ JiJ/0+1/2G (FROM OENERATOR M PILO) 41' COla/? w/ t/...... (FROM PRC TO GENERATOR WELTER & BATTERY CHARGER) 5 r' CCWIXRT W/ MUL7/CkR)l/G7CP CABLE ---R -R CONTROL) B '' CLINaI? B PA/R (MM) !2t ALARM CABLES AND Nn DN PULL CME (FDR GEN A(ARMS) .*. A4.1. 1 C WOUND PLAN NORTH \,f4j SCALE: AS NOTED GRAPHIC CAF; 20' 10' 0 10' 20' SCALE (11x17): 1" = 20'-0" SCALE (22x34): 1" = 10'-0" 000 V 7 Z rc s° Z�w _LE.ILU a& LLZo� ZZ1 W /f SEPH P- JOHNS ry c. No. 0402053459 6Y , 03/04/2020 DespneJ •m ea �_ T. )G EYE SIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FAIRVIE'N ROAD ORE, VA _2537 retl For. c /N W ,g TMs UTILITY PLAN E4 PROPOSED 6' CHAIN LINK FENCE w/ 7' BARBED MIRE (BY DINERS) PROPOSED n I— X — X — X — SOf50'FENCED CONIPOMD X — X (2500 SF.) (BY OINERS) i r , r , 11 PROPOSED CAREE COIER 'DOGHOUSE' "+ x FUTURE FUTURE FUTURE TO BE INSTALLED 04ER PROPOSED '2'x20' ILEASEA 12'x16' L5A 12'x25 x CONDUIT STUB UP a TONER LEASE A 5F.)AT&T )(192 (300 S.F.)UND D PC COVDNS W/ PROPOSED (J) 24M FER CABLES(240 X x y PROPOSED (9) 6/C DC CABLES PROPOSED MONOPOLE 195'-0' (BY OTHERS') I I L — — -J AT&T 120/2t0V, 11, 200A PTLC w/ L _ _ J CER PLUG (INTEGRAL TO INC) PROPOSED HANONOE (BY OTHERS) flf x i u I PROPOSED AT&T GENERATOR CONO 17S u A (ROUTED BENEATH PLATFOPM TO Pac, 10't) J t 5 8 x 1 x 1 — PROPOSED AT&T I£RDV 1201240V PROPOSED PAD MOUNTED u -- 6'-B]' 6'-8' C vSTEEL NIC (NEO /PO760) ON TRANSFORMER (BY OTHERS) STEEL PEDESTALS ON CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED (2) t' CONDUITS %2t� PROPOSED (POPONER, JTSt) AT&T PRPO PROPOSED (1) t' CONDUIT &T�e4 & H s 190 BALLON TANK (POP Inca JW'.*) (BY DRIERS) X — X X X x' 6�COYCRE'!E PAD PROPOSED '2044014, 10 6 GANG IN PROPOSED 12'-6"X20' LEASE AREA (250 SF LEASE AREA) METER STAG( (SWENANDOAH VALLEY PROPOSED AT&T'7-6'20' LEASE AREA ELECRBC COOP) (BY OTHERS) w/ (250 SF. LEASE AREA) PROPOSED 120424OV, 14 200A AT&T METER AND MOB a3 AT&T GPS ANTEMLA (ATTACHED TO MC) r PROPOSED 2' UG ❑O ER. 10't) (FUO AT&TAT&7 2GOA PoNER, PROPOSED 12' ACCESS GATE (BY OTHERS) ❑PROPOSED 2' UG CONDUIT 2 PROPOSED lO' GRA MEL. ACCESS DRIW (MR AT&T TELCO, 45't) (BY OTHERS) .*. A4.1. 1 C WOUND PLAN NORTH \,f4j SCALE: AS NOTED GRAPHIC CAF; 20' 10' 0 10' 20' SCALE (11x17): 1" = 20'-0" SCALE (22x34): 1" = 10'-0" 000 V 7 Z rc s° Z�w _LE.ILU a& LLZo� ZZ1 W /f SEPH P- JOHNS ry c. No. 0402053459 6Y , 03/04/2020 DespneJ •m ea �_ T. )G EYE SIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 141 FAIRVIE'N ROAD ORE, VA _2537 retl For. c /N W ,g TMs UTILITY PLAN E4 PROPOSED FENCE COPNfX POSTS TO SE GIWNDED 'iMW/RBED r0 PROPOSED GROLA0 —X—X—X X� 5/S7EM (BY O MFRS) } S f O G X— X— X— x— x— X_ COMPOUND G7/N0 RING (TIP OF 2 LOCAROVS) FUTURE FUURE 12? 20 12N6' X LEASE AREA LEASE AREA (240 S.F.) (192 S.F.) x I 4x I I I I I (300 S.F.) I I I x I x R53BAR (PART of A1C) 4 (BOND TO TOMER RAG W/ 12 G,?M, STRNVOED, ULATE7 COPPER MIRE) PROPOSED HAND/RXE (BY OIHERB) x X X — X PROPOSED 120140V, 10 6 GANG Mf1ER SING! (SHENANDOAH VALLEY ammo COON (BY OITIERS) W/ PROPOSED 120j 140V, 1I, 200A AT&r M57BP AND MOLE PROPOSED 6'CHAW LNV FENCE' 'iMW/RBED VIRE (BY OTHERS) —X—X—X X� O G COMPOUND G7/N0 RING (TIP OF 2 LOCAROVS) FUTURE x R t• LEASEAREA I X (BOND TO GR%WD RAG (300 S.F.) 1, I x PROPOSED MONOPOLE 195'-0• my DIMS) X SED MONOPOLE OFOYND G (BY OTHERS) NMI - PROPOSED BU338AR (IMACHEa rO TOWER ON MSULITOR.S BOND To EX/SRAG TOMER r RAG AT 2 LOCADOIVS) AR67M CA" COVER '00WOUSE' TO BE INSTALLED OIER PROPOSED (3) 6-A, cONDGYT STUB UP 0 TOMER d� BOND PROPOSED GROUND RING r0 COMPOUND G7/N0 RING (TIP OF 2 LOCAROVS) x BU5584R (PARr OF MTC) - (BOND TO GR%WD RAG 1, (� W/ 12 GREEN, STRM'DED, ) i INSUU)ED COPPER MTREJ ..•'l 4 PROPOSED AT&r IAI 1201240V •!''� 6' -9'X6. -B. Srm A1C (NEO 120050) ON O S7EEE PEDESTALS ON CYNCIVER7 PAD y' (NEO /ZOJ2<) ANO PROPOSED yK Ars? TO W DESEL GENERATOR Ja x F 4 W/ 190 GAUDY rANR (GENEPAC/NEO 120230) ON PROPOSED 1 X2 GCMICRLE PAD M PROPOSED12'-6x'20' LEASE AREA (230 SF. LEASE AREA) PROPOSED GROUND ROD W/ INSPECTION KU PROPOSED 12 9CW GROUND CONDUCRM (OR PER AONU. SPECS) (TOP) PROPOSED GROUND ROD Or) SYMBOLS 0 CAOWELD TYPE CONNECTION '1 COMPRESSION TYPE CONNECTION fx� ) G -- PLAN GROUNDINGS WIRE NORTH ES SCALE: NTS TYPICAL SECTOR A, PROPOSED j2 INSULATED GROUND WIRE (SEE NOTE 5) (TORI PROPOSED 06 INSULATED BU558eR COPPER CONDUCTOR AT SECTOR) _ _/2 GREEN, STRINGED INSULATED COPPER SUSSBAR 1 3 CONDUCTOR (ROUTED �(A CABLES $.TBLE SECfOR IENE1-) TO EACH AT&T ANTENNA SECTOR) I J2/0 GREEN, STRANDED INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR (ROUTED W/ PROPOSED CABLES PROPOSED TO AT&T MOUNT LEVEL) AT&T 3" DIESEL GENERATOR I f:P61E WaO� s MwFPAr DQE NPTE YL 4').—(AT1 II f �A PA PROPOSED AT&T 8'-8' X 6'-8' STEEL WIC (SEE NGT7.) vnc EXISTING TOWER O O GROUND ROD GROUND RING (SEE NOTE 7) (TTP) N� I (TYP) PROPOSED STEEL COMBO GEN/MC PLATFORM (BOND TO PROPOSED GROUND RIND AT (2) LOCATIONS) PROPOSED J2 AWG BCW BURIED GROUND RING. REFER TO SITE GROUNDING PUN. BDTE$: I. PROVIDE %2AWG GROUNDING CONDUCTOR, U.O.N. 2. PROVIDE BONGING AND GROUNDING CONDUCTORS WITH GREEN TYPE THAN INSULATION, U.O.N. 3. ADD A2/0 GREEN INSULATED CONDUCTOR BETWEEN CABLE MY AND CRIPSTRUT/COVER, 4. BUSSBARS ARE TO BE TINNED COPPER BARS d'v2'>t12� MOUNTED ON INSULATORS, U.O.N. 5. GROUNO INTEGRATED ANTENNAS, OC SURGE DEVICES, AND RRHe PER MAFAI. SPECS. 6. NO CADWELDING AT SECTOR LEVEL, 7. GROUND RODS SHAH BE 5/8'0x8' LC COPPER CLAD STEEL ROD DRIVEN VERTICALLY, SPACING TO BE MIN, 6' SEPARATION WITH I6' SEPARATION PREFERRED WHERE POSSIBLE. 8. STEEL NO PRE -EQUIPPED FROM MANUFACTURER WNH(2) BUSSBARS. BOND EACH BUSSBAR WITH (I) EACH %2 GREEN, STRANDED, INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND RING AND TD TOWER RING PER GROUNDING PUN. 9. TYPICAL SECTOR GROUNDING SHOWN BELOW. (3) SECTORS TO BE INSTALLED AND GROUNDED. / Y \GROUNDING DIAGRAM \_E52 SCALE: NTS 6 AWG STRANDED Cu WIRE WITH GREEN, 6001 THWN INSULATION OR BLACK MARKED AS REQUIRED BY NEC GROUND BAR ON WALL, FLOOR OR ON ANTENNA TOWER 0 FlINSULATR NSU L • COPPER BARED I, QUIREO NOTH AS EACH CI .� CONNECTION FOR: COAXIAL CABLE SHIELD COAXIAL CABLE SURGE SUPPRESSORS CABLE ENTRY PORTS (HATCH PLATES) RECTIFIER FRAMES 24V & 46V DC POWER RETURN BAR GENERATOR FRAME WORK TELCO GROUND BAR MASTER GROUND BAR ANGLE SHOWN TO ILLUSTRATE WELD DETAIL. NOTES: Q AT THE LOWEST POINT ON THE BAR EXOTHERMIC WELD (WELDING I. TWO—HOLE, LONG BARREL COMPRESSION LUG WITH 2 AWG STRANDED COPPER PROHIBITED ON ROOFTOPS) CONDUCTOR AND GREEN THW INSULATION TO GROUND BAR, ROUTE CONDUCTOR AS APPLICABLE TO BURIED GROUND CONDUCTOR OR MASTER GROUND BAR AND 2 AWG SOLID BARE TINNED CONNECT WITH TWO -HOLE LUG TO "P" SECTION. COPPER GROUND CONDUCTOR. 2. USE PERMANENT MARKER TO LABEL THE WHOLE BAR AS "P" WITH I" HIGH EXOTHERMIC WE -D TO BURIED GROUND LETTERS. RING AND GROUND BAR 3. FOR GROUND BAR LOCATED OUTDOORS, ON -GRADE ONLY, EXOTHERMICALLY WELD A 2 AWG BARE TINNED COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND BAR AND EXOTHERMICALLY WELD TO BURIED GROUND CONDUCTOR, 4. APPLY NO -OX OR EQUIVALENT TO MATING SURFACE OF LUG AND WIPE CLEAN INSTALLATION OF GROUND WIRE EXCESS COMPOUND. /T \TO CABLE GROUND BAR DETAI 2 P MENTAL/SECTOR GROUND BARD AI \_I±6j SCALE: NTS \\_E6j SCALE: NTS ,I GRADE CONNECTION 2 Q INTERIOR GROUND PIN 0 O CONDUCTOR TERMINATING ON ANY G3QU� BAR SHALL 0 7 2 HAVE AN I 0 _J 4 IDENTIFICATION TAC ATTAHpAi AWG BCW SOLID, TINNED DOUBLE CRIMP GRADE CONNECTION 2 EACH GROUND INTERIOR GROUND PIN 0 O CONDUCTOR TERMINATING ON ANY G3QU� BAR SHALL 0 7 2 HAVE AN I 0 _J 4 IDENTIFICATION TAC ATTAHpAi AWG BCW SOLID, TINNED A �� EACH ENO THAT Wlil ®, 13" IDENTIFY liS ORIGIN W/MIN. 5/8'068'-0" 4. 13" 7 AND DESTINATION EXOTHERMIC WELD LONG SECTION "P' - SURGE PROTECTORS $„CF TION "I" - ISOLATED QROQNQ Znuc • CABLE ENTRY PORTS (HATCH PLATES) (N2) ALL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FRAMES. • GENERATOR FRAMEWORK (IF AVAILABLE) ISOLATED GROUND BAR - IGB (#'2) (p2) TELCO GROUND BAR (p2) DETAIL NOTES • COMMERCIAL POWER COMMON NEUTRAL/GROUND BOND (b2) 1. EXOTHERMICALLY WELD ;#2 AWG BARE TINNI • +24V POWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR (#2) SOLID COPPER CONDUCTOR TO GROUND BAR. • -46VPOWER SUPPLY RETURN BAR (#'2) ROUTE CONDUCTOR TO BURIED GROUND RING COAX SUPPRESSION AND PROVIDE PARALLEL EXOTHERMIC WELD. SECTION_ A" - SURGE ABSORBERS • INTERIOR GROUND RING (q2) 2. USE PERMANENT MARKER TO DRAW THE • EXTERNAL EARTH GROUND FIELD (BURIED LINES BETWEEN EACH SECTION AND LABEL ORDDNO RING) (N2) EACH SECTION ("P', "q", 'I') WITH 1" HIGH • METALLIC COLD WATER PIPE (IF AVAILABLE) LETTERS. (#'2) • BUILDING STEEL (IF AVAILABLE) (y2) 3. APPLY NO -OX OR EQUIVALENT TO MATING SURFACE OF LUG AND WIPE CLEAN EXCESS COMPOUND. 6 CELL REFERENCE GROUND BAR DETAIL E6 SCALE: NTS 7 GROUND ROD DETAIL E6 SCALE: NTS NO OVERLAPPINGP RMITTEO NOTE 06 AWG FROM ANTENNA/RRH/FILTER GROUND KIT ALL GROUND LUGS SHALL HAVE CLEAR HEAT SHRINK SLEEVE, MARKING TAPE SHALL NOT BE APPLIED OVER HEAT SHRINK. a2 AWG GREEN, STRANDED O O COPPER CONDUCTOR (FROM CABLE GROUND BAR AT PLATFORM) L? 1JkCTOR GROUND BAR D TA EB SCALE: NTS N2 AWG GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE (INTERIOR GROUND RING) T&B CO. "tt-RAP^, CAT. TC376 STAND-OFF BRACKET i&B CO. °C -TAP' GAT. OR EQUIV. 2'-0" ON (%56730 CRIMP TYPE CENTER MAX. SPACING PARALLEL TAP OR EQUIV. DIRECTION OF BOND TO #6 AWG GREEN INSULATED TURN TO SHORTEST STRANDED COPPER WIRE DISTANCE TO (UNIT BOND HATCHPLATE ) T&S CO. "TY -RAP" CAT. tt25M CABLE TIE OR EQUIV. INTERIOR GROUND RING WALL C IPPORT AND UNIT BOND #2 AWG GREEN COPPER STRANDED WIRE 1§" MIN. (INTERIOR GROUND RING) Y° MAX. BARE COPPER INSULATOR COPPER CRIMP CONNECTOR TILE #54740 OR APPROVED EQUAL ®INTERIOR GROUND RING SPLICE DETAIL \,.E!j SCALE: NTS INSPECTION HAND HOLE W/ PEDESTRIAN RATED COVER (ERICO T4168 OR EQUIV, 10'0 FOR GROUND RODS, (AT GRADE) ERICO T4168H OR EQUIV, FOR CHEMRODS) — GROUND RING LOOP 0 EACH INSPECTION PORT CONCRETE OR PVCi�— GROUND RING — CABLE TO ROD CADWELD mal -7N CADWELD 0 TOP OF PIPE MASS (REPAIRY DAMAGED GALVANIZED PIPE MAST P2 AWG GRccn, alnnnucu IIj'_I�,—j��T r�I TII' INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR J " INS(CAULATE i0 PIPE MAST)GOND COR I flRH N6 AWGGREEN, DEM STRANDED xs INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR EMDEERDWEfl AND HEAT SHRINK ALL LUGS ARC DOME (OR PER MANU. SPECS) (TYR) CIGBE (GROUND BAR ZI'IE (MOUNTED NEAR/BELOW SECTOR) (TYR OF t PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL) RF CHART R "I QUANTITIES. N2 AWG GREEN, STRANDED INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR ROUTED TO ' GROUND BAR AT COAX TRANSITION—�� CLEAN SAND FILL SIZED PER GROUND RING (MIN, a2 BCW) GROUND ROD 8 INSPECTION WELL DETAIL \_L6j SCALE: NTS CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRE S ROUNDING BAR DETAIL E6 SCALE: NTS id Cg RX cn•ca•d __U_ nI«t .m , •' , a 9 4] 'aUcl Ti1M: ROG EYE SIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 t aGORIE vnj2JOA C a W aw ann. GROUNDING DETAILS aWng Numba, EG GRADE EXOTHERMIC WELD RING GROUND /2 AWG BCW SOLID, TINNED GROUND ROD COPPER CLAD STEEL ROD W/MIN. 5/8'068'-0" LONG 7 GROUND ROD DETAIL E6 SCALE: NTS NO OVERLAPPINGP RMITTEO NOTE 06 AWG FROM ANTENNA/RRH/FILTER GROUND KIT ALL GROUND LUGS SHALL HAVE CLEAR HEAT SHRINK SLEEVE, MARKING TAPE SHALL NOT BE APPLIED OVER HEAT SHRINK. a2 AWG GREEN, STRANDED O O COPPER CONDUCTOR (FROM CABLE GROUND BAR AT PLATFORM) L? 1JkCTOR GROUND BAR D TA EB SCALE: NTS N2 AWG GREEN INSULATED STRANDED COPPER WIRE (INTERIOR GROUND RING) T&B CO. "tt-RAP^, CAT. TC376 STAND-OFF BRACKET i&B CO. °C -TAP' GAT. OR EQUIV. 2'-0" ON (%56730 CRIMP TYPE CENTER MAX. SPACING PARALLEL TAP OR EQUIV. DIRECTION OF BOND TO #6 AWG GREEN INSULATED TURN TO SHORTEST STRANDED COPPER WIRE DISTANCE TO (UNIT BOND HATCHPLATE ) T&S CO. "TY -RAP" CAT. tt25M CABLE TIE OR EQUIV. INTERIOR GROUND RING WALL C IPPORT AND UNIT BOND #2 AWG GREEN COPPER STRANDED WIRE 1§" MIN. (INTERIOR GROUND RING) Y° MAX. BARE COPPER INSULATOR COPPER CRIMP CONNECTOR TILE #54740 OR APPROVED EQUAL ®INTERIOR GROUND RING SPLICE DETAIL \,.E!j SCALE: NTS INSPECTION HAND HOLE W/ PEDESTRIAN RATED COVER (ERICO T4168 OR EQUIV, 10'0 FOR GROUND RODS, (AT GRADE) ERICO T4168H OR EQUIV, FOR CHEMRODS) — GROUND RING LOOP 0 EACH INSPECTION PORT CONCRETE OR PVCi�— GROUND RING — CABLE TO ROD CADWELD mal -7N CADWELD 0 TOP OF PIPE MASS (REPAIRY DAMAGED GALVANIZED PIPE MAST P2 AWG GRccn, alnnnucu IIj'_I�,—j��T r�I TII' INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR J " INS(CAULATE i0 PIPE MAST)GOND COR I flRH N6 AWGGREEN, DEM STRANDED xs INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR EMDEERDWEfl AND HEAT SHRINK ALL LUGS ARC DOME (OR PER MANU. SPECS) (TYR) CIGBE (GROUND BAR ZI'IE (MOUNTED NEAR/BELOW SECTOR) (TYR OF t PER SECTOR, 3 TOTAL) RF CHART R "I QUANTITIES. N2 AWG GREEN, STRANDED INSULATED COPPER CONDUCTOR ROUTED TO ' GROUND BAR AT COAX TRANSITION—�� CLEAN SAND FILL SIZED PER GROUND RING (MIN, a2 BCW) GROUND ROD 8 INSPECTION WELL DETAIL \_L6j SCALE: NTS CONNECTION OF GROUND WIRE S ROUNDING BAR DETAIL E6 SCALE: NTS id Cg RX cn•ca•d __U_ nI«t .m , •' , a 9 4] 'aUcl Ti1M: ROG EYE SIRBAUGF SITE ID: 4124 FA # 10138153 t aGORIE vnj2JOA C a W aw ann. GROUNDING DETAILS aWng Numba, EG �vww.ambar -PR( May/June 2016 Vol. Sit No. 3 R -Ty A Publication of the Real Property, 'gust and Estate Law Section !f% Amerman Bar Association p. 22 p. 44 p. 53 FFA"l-1 RES 10 Cell Phone Towers Do Not Affect Property Values (Or the Case of Three Board Bearings and One Temporary Tower) By Richard A. F orsten, Wendie C. Stabler, and Olufunke O. Fagbami ?' Estate Planning for the Chronically Ill, Aging, and Otherwise Vulnerable or Isolated Client By Martin '-1. ",henkman 35 By the Way, What About the Post -Closing Credit Enhancement? By F derick L. Klein and Kevin L. Shepherd 41 Bipartisan Budget Act Significantiy Changes Social Security Retirement Benefit Options By Steven A. Brand, David G. Freitag, Ron R. Robinson, and Bruce A_ Tai-mahill 44 53 Reappraisal of Ground Lease Rentals By Jerome D. Whalen Explaining Estate Funding with Hands-on Examples By Paige K Ben-Yaacov !"Still, VVi & h1or it rl ■ Mvllm 2016 1 ix'1RIi in rick 4,I0, M14 - Defending liberty Pursuing Instice DFF`ARTUItaYTs 3 Letters to the Editor 4 Section Newts 8 Uniform Laws Update 16 Keeping Current—Property 30 Keeping Current --Probate 51 Technology—Property 64 The Last Word REAL I TRUST& rrPROPERTY ESTATFA AW fslitorial Policy- 1114hit, t* 1'roth iia is de-agr d tit a+�iM I'a%ve•rs- prar- tiring in the .en•.is of real estate, wills, trutits, and -;aces uV providing arlid s and echlraial mrttcr writtrn in a rraclabie anti mfnmlafiv, .tyle -flee article,, other edit,-rml cunlene, and adverteivatents: an. intended to give up -it, date, prartnal inionnalion that u°ill aid lana y,vv, in giving their ciients accurate, prompt, and efficient urvice. Fhe materials contained herein represent the opinions of the authors and editors and should not be construed to be those of Dither the American Bar Association or the Section of Real Property, I rust and Fstale taw unless adopted pursuant to the bylaws of the Association. Nothing contained herein is to be considered the ren- dering of legal or ethical advice for specific cases, and readers are responsible for obtaining such advice from their own legal counsel. These materials and any forms and agreements herein are intended for educational and informational purposes only, 2010 American Ear A Tsociation All rights me%vn•ect_ No pert or this publication may be repri.Auced, stored in a reirieval system, or transmitted ue any farm or by any neean%, electronic, mr dianical. pho- tocopying, recording, or o(henvise, without the prier written penros- xion of the publisher Contact ARA Copyrights 4 ConfracN, at unvw ani ricanhavorghiti ite^! reprinuhtrnt or via tax it (312) Q.VA- j t,it10, for pi-rtnisalon Printed in the U. ,A. 2 I'MIRVIt & I'I401e1-1i`l•y nu MAY/Jot 2016 A\(, t" J, r,!,!,_,?. x �l LFP .-„..,. Dave L. C e,r., Id-; lichael Il. Glaaerman Arlicle4 Fji(ors JirFii;..•� i.. Clitril! {:tri i'a Derslicc 111 pmrtrnents fditnr Jame!- C' Y'l-i fli All correspcandmize ayd tnant,Lmets sb bd bL. +t -Tit to the editors of Prolvte & Property AVA 1"t 11 iSHINIC l)�re•ilclr ! lint•, fair, DesignAf"md Pltoila Zr .�Ile2nd?;f?:Y,. I' -.-i +;l,l,,±titn .'✓`Lt"f:'t6:: UX °i OO sil"iG ()peratrun< �*rdtr:��;er Advertising Saies and °`~'wdia Kit!, f ll” A' riomtkt ' Inc. O,V^ i.a, J_ - _-., Cayrr Nm -!,arr �Wveriising Sales F mAdr &Prot" 11%N tt164ti3T_'► r publetied wx frrne, a yip be },unary/Rtbruars. \larch/ April. MAY July /f t4tr;t, Sef+tas ber1,'Cenber,aid Nm rnber/Derrtr6m1 +r a %-c nvT, to ul, mernbivx by the American Bar Real Propetty. mist and Ewe fan Fdenno ",, ad ^encs w_ scab mpttoo. ane orrulatitm offices 321 N bark Sheet, Chrcafc,,l1. ttYii-it>� 77x+ pricr at an anratal scti> ,zif+t m frn onerribm of the lien am :d Kral prope ty. T nisi and Estate Law 021)) is, xxtud d in thew d4te4 acid is Wena &datiirje tlienirum Any member of the ASA may ti i,xiu a memt+er of the S mm' of Real Pn neit�•, Thad acrd Efate L.W.- tiy serrimg areriia" of SMand an appliwlitai r idrrscsrl to fhe Srcho , A A member- ,,Np is a prertgiwte it, Ssxivae nwmb,aster Lndiv-utuals and institutions not rtigit,le for ABA m aiemship may .udr rribe ti, Pnitsrfr & pnatty far S per year, W a`ir per year for �* u, im addrrssed oubade the L iize' SL&ss and its possession, Single cY ^s ars 57 plus $3.95 fix pmtW And.t,vurdhnpr Requests for %ibacrphons. to back issues sfuvrid be addregwd to- ABA Stn xr Center, Arrrr•rrcan Sar Assc circ=n. 321 1s. Clark Strcri, L3ucago, !! n(xa_r+4-7�3,1>�t'-1�-�21, ta>, (.31Sf'�-*SZ;I, rte raa'al auxfea�sameramdrartmg f'zriadicelss rate Fa:.iagr Faatd of Q . <Iitrsis, an 13 1' _A ��1 rsx' v"`R� t':tuenga� ar9 mucr rr..h..t, Oil- maw+s.'•`^r'cr_ W +iTTI) becl- tx.wTI issue date to 5P'%4* �Vicft€ 4F':ft&-,j.,5i"Prpc,,Md1Ai.m-i irin W.t lcr Cin, t^ , rk f N C1 :F , e t, Lhes t o 1 5% it' -TS B Affect Property values (Or the Case of Three Board Hearings and One Temporary Tower), 1, M IL f r7 j u +%s Ali I .. r. ell phone use has exploded. Ten years ago, the iPhone did not exist. Smartphones did not exist. The iPad did not exist. Black- berries were cutting edge. There was no Twitter, no lnstagram, nv Pinter- est. Facebo ok ivas still nascent, and IvIv9pace was still popular. Today, peo- ple regularly access the Internet over their smartphones and tablets. They tweet, they post, they snapchat. in just an eight-year period, from 2017 to 2014, AT&T saw a 100,000`", increase in mobile data traffic un its wireless ne*work---not a 100'% increase, not a 1,tUR. increase, but a 100,0(X1"I„ increase. Scc Randall Stephenson, Chairman's I eller, AT&T 2014 Annual Report (Feb. l0, 2015), taww.att.com/ Investor/ ATTAnnual/2014/letter to__ investors.lttml. National mobile data traffic is estimated to increase another sixfold from 2015 to 2020, at a com- pound annual growth rate of 42%. !lee Cisco, VNI Mobile Fors cast Hiehlighr,;, 2075 2020, www.cisco.ct)m/assets/seal/ sp/vni/ forc*cast_highlights_mobile/ index.html (last visited Feb. 23, 201 n). People have responded to this tech- nology: And they like it. A lot. But one thing people do not seem to like is cell towers—the infrastructure necessary to make the netevork work. Despite pundits who predicted that technology would reduce the num- ber of towers, the need for additional towers and network capacity is greater than ever, as the network capacity to transmit data has been far outstripped by the ever-growing demands of a population abandoning its landline in favor of the convenience of smart- phone-sand mart- phonesand mobile data access. in most jurisdictions, proposed new cell towers m List undergo some sort of public application process involving a public hearing. Given the chance, chose in the area will oppose any proposed new tower. While the Federal Te lecom- munications Act of 1996,47 U.S.C. §332 (7)(B)(iv), prohibits jurisdictions from denying cell tomer applications on the basis of alleged ill -health effects, Richard A. Forsten and Wendie C. Stabler are partners, and Olufunke 0. Fagbami is an associate, in the Wilmington, Delaware, office of Saul Ewing LLP, neighbors invariably argue that a new tower will adversely affect prop- erty value; (spc.cifically theirs), so the pending tower application should be rejected. Appraisers argue to the contrary, Cell towers, they point out, are much like ether modern infrastructure (tele- phone poles, utility lines, streetlights, and soon). Although cell towers may initialIv he noticed, they quickie facie into the background and have no appreciable effect on value -jenst as telephone poles, utility lines, street- lights, and the other infrastructure of modern life do not affov_t value. Although this conclusion may seem counterintuitive to many, and certainty these opposing a new tower will vehe- mently disagree, it is borne out by the statistics anti studies. Recently, in Sussex County; Lk -la - ware, a unique set of circumstances made it possible to review the effect of a prolvosed tower on the property val- ues of surrounding; properties Ix/nre the final approval was granted. Specifically, after an approval for a proposed tower was granted, it was challenged. While the challenge was pending, a tempo- rary tower was erecter.( in the location proposed for the permanent tower. The challenged approval was reversed and a nety hearing ordered. Because the county has a policy of allowing zon- ing rode violations to remain in place while the property owner seeks a vari- ance or undertakes other remedial action (in this case, the new hearing process), the county allowed the tem- porary tower to remain. Over the course of the next two (Fears, while the challenges to the tower played out before the Sussex County Rekord of Adjustment and the Delaware courts, the temporary tower remained, allowing the tower applicant to ana- lyze pmperty values before and after the temporary tower was constructed and to measure its effect on local prop- erty values ascompared to the market as a whole. in fact, as further described herein, and consistent with the broader literature on the subject, the actual data for the site in question confirmed no effect on value. This article is divided into three parts. First, it reviews various shidies and analyses available on the valuation question, all of which generally indi- cate that cell towers have little or no effect on the value of nearby proper- ties. Following; this general review, the article examines the case of AT&T V, Sasmm • County Buecrd of Adjusinreut, No. S14r1-044X01 NIJP, 2015 WL 197%20 Wel. Super. Ct_ Apr. 3t1, 2015), in which AT&T was able to dvmon trate that its proposed tower would have no effect on value because, during; the pendency Of the lengthy appeals process con- cerning the originally -approved tower, A l'&T had erected a temporary tower, which was shown to have no effect on value. Put another way, unlike: most cell tower applications in which opponents argue that studies from other areas are not indicative of the effect the prv}wsed tower will have on their properties, A I&I was able to conclusively dem- onstrate that the progxssed tower in the proposed location would have no effect on nearby property values_ finally, this article concludes with some other les - so ins from the AT&T case - Generally Spea ng,, Ce.1 Towems Do thiole Affect Property Vallue Generally speaking, most stud ie s of the issue conclude that proximity to a cell tower has no significant effect on property values. Forexample. a 2001 study by Thorn Consultants, which examined 85 transactions involving; homes and 26 transactions involving vacant lots, concluded that "proximity to the cell site did not affect sale prices of homes or residential lots within the Potomac study area." See'lhorrie Con- sultants, Inc., Monopole hulhrct Study on Residential Real Estate Prices %r Hotn(N rung Resuh-utial Lags in the Vit 'isilyof 1ke Bullis Schad, Potomac, McwNoru- er_u Coun ly, Mnnlhund (May 2, 21X11), at 3. The AV] study, in turn, referenced a 1998 study in the Richmond, Virginia, area that examined six towers and 140 properties, and that also concluded "there was no consistent market evi- dence suggesting any negative impact upon improved residential properties exposed to such facilities in the areas included in the study." See Allen G. Fhrrin Jr, MAi, SRA & Joseplo W. Smith Ill, Tine Irupat•t of f ommitneications Timers lit oB VIT & PIMI-e.Irn v MAY%Jin 2016 1 1 on Roudenlial Pro)xrle/ Vnhirs, Right of Way, Mar./Apr. 199Q, at 17, avail. able at haps://wctw.inti„onhnc.org/ eweb/upload /0399b.pdf. A 20W study of homes in ()range County, Hor- ida, found a minimal effect of 214, curt value:- See Sandy Bond, Usnrg GIS to r'1`Ieasure the linpxtet e) L)istentec fo Cell Phone T rove rs on 1-fo s , Prici 5 it a Flerrrda, Appraisal J., Fall 2007. A 2013 study from Chatham County, North Caro- lina, concluded that "the proposed tower will not adversely affect prop- erty values in the general vicinity of the tower" and a study from that same year in Holly Springs, North Carolina, concluded that for an existing tower, "there does not appear to be any sig- nificant or consistent change in value from the properties located [closer to or farther from the Lower] ... con- cluding that the tower does not affect the value of the properties as distance increases from [the] tower" See David A. Smith, ftnproet r1 rtnh/sis ora Pmlmsed Fr fec-onun,rrricalienrs True -r on the Val- reeVal- 1101;4Proprerties in fire Gene rap Vicrnil y of the Tower Lx -ate d on Pnylhress Road, Chatham ComdY. Ninth Carolina (.Sept. 10, 2013), at 1, available at w•wvwcha- thamnc.org/ Rezoning.Strbdi visionCases/2013/ 9-16-13 BC)C'/Meacham_Cell_l_ot/ PFI_ Comments/ Impact%20Anaalysis %20SK011715.0f; Tom 1. Keith & Associates, Inc-, Imp ad if Cell Towwr crit titnn -ronclhW Proph•rhoi available at http://d-19pcpjksqjx5i.cloudfrc)nt.net/ media/rc retiearc-h/re11_towe>r stucly- pdf (last visited Feb. 2-3,2016). Finally, a 200.5 study from New Castle County, Delaware, looked at eight tower sites and similarly concluded that "the mar- ket demonstrates no ascertainable diminution of value to surrounding neighborhoods due to the installation or presence of a nearby communica- tions tower." See Appraisal -Associates, Inc., htrJxtct if a Telecommunications Torvcr upon Vahi(: (f Re-,identud Prup- crtiee (Aug. 2005), at 93- "The data demonstrate_. that residences in close proximity to a tower (less than one quarter mile or 2,(XX1 feet in the ca.�.e of the vast majority of the sales studied) did not incur a measurable diminu- tion in value after development of the tower." Id. at 92. 12 1'tune� rr & i IVIN WIA �"A MAY/JU'.L 2016 A 2005 survey conducted by researcher,, in New Zealand found an interesting bias. Although the study concluded that proximity to a tower did seem to affect value, it also found that those in the "control group," who did not live near ii tower, expressed a great deal more concern over the effect of a tower on property value than those who lived near,) tower. See Sandy Pn-)nd & Ko -Kang Wang, Thr Impact of Cell Phone 1 %rrao rs oil I louse Pric-c3 est Rrwrdenhof Neizh hrncuxn&, Appraisal J_, Summer 25X1.5, at 256,262-65, Specifi- cally, almost halt of the control group expressed concern about the effect on value, while only 13°, of those living near a tower expressed concern, and more than 6M!, were not worried about the effect on value. Id. The researchers theorized ti`iat this difference betwee-P those who did not live near a tower versus those who did may he because those living near tower did not want to express fears about property value decline that xvould then, in fact, lead to lolver property values. Id. An expla- nation just as likely, if not more ser, is posited by researchers whose studies find no general effect on value --that is, that because cell towers arc. perceived as part of today's modern infra- structure, they simply fade into the background and are not noticed. Those living near towers do not express con- cern, or do not perceive the cell towers as having a negative effect ern property values, because the tow=ers havesimph, faded into the background as part of the existing landscape_ Despite the general consensus that cell towers do not adversely affect property values, courts have sometimes allowed boards and admin- istrative bodies to ignore studies from other jurisdictions and locations, on the apparent theory that such studies fail to take local factors into account. For example, in Crnitular Penn. eyh wia, LLC: it 5ttssm C'nunht 6exrrd ey Adt shnrnl, No. 05A -12 -003 -RFS, 2007WL 152rrttl (Del. Super. Ct. Jan. 19, 2007), at *8, the Delaware Superior C'ourt justified the board's refusal to consider two out- of-state analyses because they "were not substantially similar to the pro- posed area in question." The court then suggested that Cingularcould have studied the effect its proposed tower would have on paoperties in the irnmc diate area, but how to study an un -built tower was not explained. Indeed, this is the c(Mundrum facing many appli- cationc--whin- studies and data based on other towers indicate no significant effect on value, opponents claim that such studies invo wing other areas and other towers should not apply to their particular properties. in 2013, though, AT.&T would find itself in the unique and unanticipated position of demonstrating that its pro- posed tower would have no effect on value based on actual market data from the actual geographic area surrounding the actual proposed tower. Thus, the challenge of disproving a negative had just become much easier. AT&T v. Sussex Co antjr, One Cell Tower, `a h1rs: e Hearings, Nca on Vallme Thr case that would become r17't;7' it Ssse°:x (bunny Booed rjAtlnLslntenl began in the early 2(XX)s, when New C: ingular Wireless TVS (which would later be acquired by AW) first iden- 1 ifit-d the need for a new cell tower as part of its network in the general vicin- ity of Bethany Beach, Sussex County, Delaware. After several years of fits and starts, C:ingular finally found a suitable site with a willing property owner—the rear of a combination Arby's Restaurant/BP Gas Station parking lot. The property was located on the east side of Route 1, the major north/south artery serving the Dela- ware beaches from Fenwick Island at the Maryland line to Rehoboth Beach to the north- A late night drive-thru for the Arby`s was located on the back side of the: building (aloe same side as the proposed tower) and a water retention pond was located at the very rear of the property. Til the immediate south of the property was a furniture store and to the immediate north, a small undevel- oped parcel. To the east and a portion of the southern boundary zvas a small (46 -unit) condominium community called "Sea pines." To the south of Sea Pines were a I-loliday inn Express and a seafood restaurant, and to the east of Sea pines was the much larger, and considerably taller, !x a Colony Condominiums, consisting of multiple nine -story building;-. Ser Figure I. Under the Sussex County Zoning Code, if a cell tower "is to be erected within .:0) feet of any residentially oneti lot," as was the case here, a spe - o ial use exception, is required from the Board of Adjustimment. Sussex County Cele § 115-104.2(A). In addition to meeting; certain technical requirements regarding height, setback, and si;ht- ing, among others, the applicant must also demonstrate that the special use exception will not "substantially affect adversely the uses of the adjacent and neighboring property:" Sussex County Code 5115-210. Cing>ular submitted its original cell tower application in September 200L). Neighbors opposed the tower, but the board granted the request by a 3-2 vote. Oppoments of the project then appealed to the Delaware Superior Court; while the appeal was pending, Cingular, with the permission of the county, installed i temporary' cell tower. After the tem- porary to-wer was erected and while the appeal was pending, it was discov- ered that the county had posted notice of the hearing on the wrong property (the undeveloped adjacent parcel to the north). Thus, the superior court held that even though posting of a property is not required under county= rules, and all other notices (for example, newspa- per and mailings) had been properly given, if the county was going to post on a property, it needed to post on the correct property, and a new hearing was ordered. See tit Piucs 1T11, Ccwdo. A��'rr orf [hese s v Ziel. of Adjustment, No. SIOA-014)03 71 IG, 201O 11'1_. 825O842 (Del. Super. Cf. Od. 28, 2010). So, Cingular (now a part of AT&T) event back to the board for a new hearing;. This time, more opponents showed up and the board voted 3-2 to deny the request; in doing so, the board noted in its written derision that "it was impossible for the Board to disregard the large number of indi- viduals opposing the tower.- This time Cingular appealed, first to the supe- rior uperior court, which affirmed the board, and then to the Delaware Supreme Court. The supreme court reversed the board's decision because the bixird applied the wrong standard in Figure 1 _ evaluating the application; the board found only that the proposed tower would -adversely affect" neighlx-,r- ing properties, not "substantially affect adversely" as required by the Sussex Countv Code. See Now, 6ugulur Win - it PCS ik Bd. i!f Afjuslnrcul, (Z A.3d 607,611-12 (Del. 2013). The mutter then returned to the board for a third hearing, sonic four years after the first hearing, and the stage was now set: with a temporary tower having; been in place for over three years, one could kook at the movement of property val- ues in the vicinity of the temporary tower both before and a fter the tower was constructed and compare those movements to the movement of prop- erve values in the wider market; or, put another i,vay, one could determine with relative certainty what effect, if any, a tower at the proposed location might have. The Ternporary 'dower Has MW dated on Property Valor AT&T had two appraisers look at the market effects of the temporary tower. The first appraiser looked at sales of two-bedroom nonwaler-vices condo- minium units (that is, units comparable to the condominium units .adjoining the cell tower site). He found a total of 36 sales, of which the top two styles, and six of the top 10 sales, were in the Sea Pines Condominium community immediately adjoining the cell tower site. If the tower were going to have an effect on value, one would think that the top sales prices would not be achieved in Le commu- nity immediately surrounding the tower. AT&T's other appraiser tracked the movement of prices m the a Pint—_s core munitv and the larger beach com- rnunitv for two years beiore and through two years after the: installation of the tcrnporary tower. His analysis demonstrated that as the larger real estate market moved up and down, so dict the `+ea Pines community in approximately the same way See Figure 2 on page 14. In testifying before the Sussex County Board of Adjust- ment, the appraiser explained: In this high density mixed use area, thc°re'�: a lot of influences surrounding; this project already So people, when they're making a purchase decision in Sea Pines and other areas in this resort mar- ket, there are many thing;- that impact your decision, your view., your acceizs. And a cell to%ver pale, a single monopole, really is an expected thing in today's world. As we showed, one side of this property is lined with poorer lines that have been there forever People need power. Thev're an accepted part of the landscape. Apparently, people have been making purchase decisions in Sea Pines for many years in the pres- ence of those lines and the other uses like gas pumps and the convenience ~tore, and we just didn't see anv evidence of this one particular structure [having] a unique influence on property value. Opponents of the project testified at the hearing before the bckard as well. They Tacos Ara & I'rtuarena� w M-,lJt& 2016 13 offered no appraisal or other direct evi- dence of any cffect on value. in fact, sono of their testimony actually bol- stered AT&T's case when two residents testified that they had experienced no problems in fully renting their units during the rental season after the tem- porary tower was installed ---or, put another way, the temporary tower did not affect the ability of unit mvn ers to rent their units. Moreover, no unit owners complaincid of having to lower rents to secure tenants or of any other adverse economic effect. One of f1 mrs appraisers also did a study of rental rates and found that Sea Pines rental rates were consistent with the local market and that there was no effect on rental rates associated with the temporary tower. in sum, then, the case of the +us- �-c-t County temporary- tower confirms what studies, have shown for years— that MI towers have become part of the suburban landscape and have no appro,iable effect on value. Like tele- phone poles, power lines, streetlights, and the other infrastructure of modern life, ce it towers fade into the back- ground and draw no more attention regarding appeals from other boards than either infrastructure. and administrative bodies, there is no power to "remand" a decision back to the board of adjustment. (For examples of statutes in which remand is specifi- cally listed as a remedy, see, e.g., W. Code Ann. tit. 7, § 6612(b); W1. Code Ann. tit. 7, § 6214(b); Del. Code Ann. til. 9, § 8312(c); Del. Code .Ann- tit. 14, § 1414; Thi. Cot -it- Ann. tit. 18, §328(h); and W. Code Ann. tit. 19, § 2-3,50).) And this lack of remand is most likely not an accident. Most matters before a board of adjustment involve hoinewners seek• ing minor dimensional variances for things such as screened parches or additions to their homes. Judicial review, of course, can be a time-con- suming and expensive process. Rather than remands and multiple hearings, the fhlaware General Assemble gave the superior, -curt the ability to decide the matter (reverse, affirm, or modify) as part of its decision on appeal, rather than remand back to the board for fur- ther proceed ings. Indeed, although most appeals are on the recons, the General Assembly further provided Superior Court, which, by statute, has the potter to reverse, affirm, or modify a decision of the board. Scv Del. Code Ann. tit. 9, §§ 1314(f), 44180), 6018(0; 1M. Code Ann. tit. 2-2, § 328(c). Signifi- cantl; unlike other Delaware statutes Average Sags Price Figure 2. Some Other Lessons from the AT&T Case AT&T's experience in this case provides two further lessons:- First, a land use applicant needs to be absolutely cer- tain that all procedures are followed properly; and, for better or worse, this means confirming that the local gov- ernmental body has given the proper notices and made the proper mailings and 1xr.tings. But for the county's inad- vertent error in posting notice of the hearing on the wrong property in 2fX)9, A I:4i l could have avoided four years of additional litigation. One need not be heavy-handed in confirming that things are done properly, but confirma- tion should be obtained. Moie imlxwlantly, the Delaware• Superior Court's 2()15 opinion, fol- lowing the third hearing by the board, marks something of a watershed for Delaware courts in the way they dear i with decisions by boards of adjust- ment. Under Lkiaware law, appeals from the board go to the Delaware 14 Pnimvni & I'rier!'I nn-%! M,AY11m 2016 that the superior court couod receive additional evidence as part of the appeal process. VX -1. Code Ann. tit. 9, §§ 1.314(e), 4918(c), 69;8(e). `t"he only reason for the court to receive additional evidence wouki be for the churl to make find- _..-.. — inns on its own and resolve the matter once and for all, rather than remand a proceeding back to the board for another hear- ing and, potentially, another appeal. I lomeowners should not be faced with years of litigation over whether they can build an additional two feet into a setback But, despite the lack of the power to remand, when revers- ing a board decision denying a permit or variance• request, courts have almost always grid that revemal doer: not constitute a grant of the permit or vari- ance --rather, the court requires the applicant to go rack to the board and re -apply for the per- mit or variance with a new hearing and an entirely new prt� c't-ss. In other words, reviewing courts have clone the functional equivalent of a remand, even though the courts do not call what they're doing a "remand." life superior court's 2015 decision is significant, then, because the court slid ao1 reverse the board and then require Al M'to go back to the board and re- apply (for what would have Ix -,vii the fourth time) for a special use excep- tion for the cell tower. Rather, the court specifically recognized that it did not have the power to remand and them fore modified the board's decision by ordering the special exception granted. Specifically, the court explained: At this stage, Appellant (A't-& I -j has been before the Board and the Court three times regard- ing this project. The first time, the Beard's approval was reversed can procedural grounds. The svc•- ond time, the Board applied the wrong standard and denied the application, resulting in the deci- sion ultimately being reversed by the Supreme Court. Because the statute provides no authority to remand, Appellant has had to file a new application each time. While courts typically reverse rather than. modify decisions of the Board of Adjustment Raver•-.*, the statute I j clearly provides the Court with the Power to modify when appro- priate. Th.'s is such an instance . rhe statute in tie instant case only allows the court toaffirm, revers; or modify. In the absence of the option to remand, the Court finds Appellant's argument that the decision be modified to grant the permit especially compelling_ .. . t=or the foregoing reasons, the deci- sion of the Sussex C aunty Board of Adjustment is 'MOI)iF1f"D and A7'M"s Application for a spc- cial use exception to constrict a permanent 100-14xit telccrm-Rrnuni- cations Louver on jthej Property is CRANTFI). 11 T, rT, 2015 W l.1 q'7,%29 at `14-15_ Thus, the court granted AT&T the.special use �,Xception it needed to construct a per- manent Lower. When opponents did not appeal the superior court decision, NM's odyssey was finally over, 'rhe court stated that it was mo dify- ing the board's decision, not reversing it Certainly the statute states that a court may "affirm, reverse, or mod - 4v," although one would odifa,"althoughonewould think that ;;ranting a previously -denied applica- tion .'s the very epitome of a "reversal," not a "modification." "Modifica- tion" would .seem to he reserved for those situations in which, perhaps, the 1x)ard imposed conditions on a vari- ance and the court modified those cimdit,ons or le,�,sened or increased the dimensional component of a granted variance but othenvise left the ,rant in place. Regardless, though, the AT&T court's decision is good news for prop- erty ow hers and other applicants who receive denials from a bmird---the court has explicitly recognized that it lack.. the power of remand and acted accordingly: Perhaps futureapplicants will novoe- spared the cycle of hear- ing, judicial review, new hearing„ more judicial review, and so on. Conclusion :Stedic-s have long shown that cull towers have no appreciable effect on properly values, but opponents of tots - ers, and some boards that consider these applications, refuse to believe thesestudicx. Nevertheless, the results are supported by empirical clata, and, although it may _seem counterintui- tive, the results ultimately snake sense As one appraiser in the AT sT disc observed, "a cell tower pole, a single monopole, really is an expected th;ng n today's worlcti.... people have been making purchase decisions j ] for many year% in the presence of those iines and the other uses like ga,s pumps and the convenience store, and sue just didn't see any evidence of this one particular structure 1having] a unique influence on property values." The ATt {T case is especially inter- esting and uniquely helpful because it a l knved the cell lower applicant to demonstrate that there would be no effect on value for the very Icxation at issue. Property values in the vicin- ity of the temporary tower moved in the same way as p. tsper ty values in the larger market. riot oniv is this con- clusion consistent with the general literature and studies in this area, but A I&11' was actually able to demonstrate that its proposed tower in its proposed location would not affect property v, -]- u€, in the immediate arca- ■ lAW FiNAMCE 610UY PAYS YOUR BILIS IIYNEEI YOUR LIMIT'S FUNIS NAVE 1EE14 EXHAUSTED. rr tfi, stepped in to as r✓'1 as when Oe needed them most Rany others beltemed in :he F xlf�. ntt few had the i:,isdom to invest it d. Only one had the resources to htsa-qtf :o ,': • ':t.a ;to ie7'Y. $' "rd S. VW 1*. hr tstatelman(e nsquu�es: weady Yk'aPhe�. HIM:., U►trtaW �- Law Finance Group, 1'itunVIT: & PnoPt:Rrn ■ MAYI'J- 2016 15 EXHIBIT 7 October 30, 2019 Frederick County Virginia Department of Planning & Development Zoning Division 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Certification for New Telecommunications Facility at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 Dear Zoning Division: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility ("AT&T"), proposes to construct and install a new telecommunications facility on a portion of the property at 141 Fairview Road, Gore Virginia, 22637. I am a Senior Radio Frequency ("RF") Engineer for Telnet, Inc., and a consultant for AT&T. I have more than 19 years' experience in the field of RF Planning, design, and optimization. I am familiar with all regulations and standards promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") related to emissions from telecommunications facilities including the ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation. Pursuant to Section § 165-204.19(A)(4) of the Frederick County Code, I certify that the proposed telecommunications facility will comply with all relevant federal, state, and local regulations, including the FCC's RF radiation guidelines, the ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's health and safety regulations. Additionally, the proposed facility will not interfere with any public safety communication systems, including Frederick County's public safety communication systems. Sincerely, Gaurav Behl RF Engineer AT&T- 7150 Standard Drive Hanover, Maryland 21076 36319291.104/06/2020 EXHIBIT 8 October 30, 2019 Frederick County Virginia Department of Planning & Development Zoning Division 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Certification for New Telecommunications Facility at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 Dear Zoning Division: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, d/b/a AT&T Mobility ("AT&T"), proposes to construct and install a new telecommunications facility on a portion of the property at 141 Fairview Road, Gore Virginia, 22637. I am a Senior Radio Frequency ("RF") Engineer for Telnet, Inc., and a consultant for AT&T. I have more than 19 years' experience in the field of RF Planning, design, and optimization. I am familiar with all regulations and standards promulgated by the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") related to emissions from telecommunications facilities including the ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation. Pursuant to Section § 165-204.19(A)(4) of the Frederick County Code, I certify that the proposed telecommunications facility will comply with all relevant federal, state, and local regulations, including the FCC's RF radiation guidelines, the ANSI/IEEE standards for electromagnetic field levels and radio frequency radiation, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's health and safety regulations. Additionally, the proposed facility will not interfere with any public safety communication systems, including Frederick County's public safety communication systems. Sincerely, Gaurav Behl RF Engineer AT&T- 7150 Standard Drive Hanover, Maryland 21076 36319291.104/06/2020 EXHIBIT 9 AFFIDAVIT OF LANDOWNER AND COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY OPERATOR Hott Emma J. Etals, owner of 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637 and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility submit this affidavit pursuant to Frederick County Code § 165-201.19B(7): I. Hott Emma J. Etals and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility are aware that either or both may be held responsible for the removal of the proposed commercial telecommunication facility located at 141 Fairview Road, Gore, Virginia 22637. HOTT EMMA J. ETALS AND NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T NOBILITY SOLEMNLY AFFIRM under penalties of perjury and upon personal knowledge that the content of the foregoing paper is true. !P- 11117 Date Hott Emma J. Etals V -Iv'- Date 36317408.1 12/12/19 New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC d/b/a AT&T Mobility