CPPC 11-08-99 Meeting AgendaC'!OUN3'Y of FREDEPI.0
Department of Play rjDg and Development
FAX; 540/673-0632
TO: Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director
IE: November Meeting and Agenda
DATE: November 2, 1999
The Frederick County Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will be meeting
on Monday, November 8, 1999 at 7:30 p.m. in the first floor conference room of the County
Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. The CPPS will discuss the
following agenda items:
AGENDA
1) Review ofnew Capital Improvement Project (CIP) requests from various county agencies and
departments.
2) Request of Investment Land Trust to expand the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to
incorporate land at the northeast quadrant of the Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and White Oak
Road (Route 636) intersection.
3) Discussion regarding the Northeast Land Use Study.
4) Other.
Staff has been directed to advise all committee members that access to the County Administration Buildingfor night
meetings that do not occur in the Board room will be kmited to the back door of the four-story wing. I would
encourage committee members to park in the county parking lot located behind the new addition or in the Joint
Judicial Center parking lot and follow the sidewalk to the back door of the four-story wing.
Please contact our department if you are unable to attend this. meeting. Thank you.
u:1rvan\CommonlC po\1 I0899.CPPSMccting.wpd
107 North Kent Street - i4inchester, Virginia' 26+01-54
ITEM #1
2000 -2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PIAN
NEW PROJECT PRESENTATIONS
The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) will begin the process necessary to
complete the 2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The first step in this process will be for
the CPPS to meet with the directors of the various county departments and agencies that will be
submitting new project requests or modifications to projects which appeared on the 1999-2000 CIP.
The directors will present these projects to the CPPS for informational purposes and address any
questions of the subcommittee. The CPPS will be asked to rate each candidate project for the
purpose of providing the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors with a recommended
project priority list. Ultimately, the Board of Supervisors will utilize this information for the purpose
of developing the FY 2000-2001 budget for Frederick County.
Please find included with this agenda item a copy of the Individual Project Description and
Justification Forms that have been submitted by the Winchester Regional Airport and the Frederick
County Department of Parks and Recreation, a summary sheet for new project requests and project
modification requests, the 1999-2000 CIP financial and project priority spreadsheet, and the 1999-
2000 CIP Evaluation Form. The Frederick County School Board will be adopting their CIP projects
during their meeting on November 3, 1999; therefore, staff win provide this information to the CPPS
during the November 8, 1999 meeting.
-3-
-4-
SUMMARY OF NEW PROJECT REQUESTS
AND PROJECT MODIFICATION REQUESTS
Fxedenck Co a�tmel � o� Parks :and Recr� iQ�
Chester R ci tA P-04,
wr
Project
Type of Request
Project
Type of Request
1999 Local
'2000 Local
Difference in FY
Expenditure
Expenditure
Expenditure
Expenditure
Local
Request
Request
Request
Expenditure
Request
Rt. 645
Modification
$30,000
$420,000
+S390,000
Construction
+$228,965
Baseball Complex
Airfield Lighting
New
N/A
$15,000
+$15,000
Airfield
New
N/A
$210,000
+$210,000
Maintenance
N/A
$2,000,000
+ $2,000,000
Building
Fxedenck Co a�tmel � o� Parks :and Recr� iQ�
Project
Type of Request
1999 Local
2000 Local
Difference in FY
Expenditure
Expenditure
Local
Request
Request
Expenditure
Request
Sherando Park
Modification
$688,847
$917,812
+$228,965
Baseball Complex
Renovation
New Regional
New
N/A
$2,000,000
+ $2,000,000
Park Land
Acquisition In
Eastern Frederick
County
-6-
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
1999-2000
-8-
1999 - 2000 FREDERICK COUNTY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
EVALUATION
FORM
LISTED
BY DEPARTMENT IN
ORDER OF DEPARTMENT PRIORITY
CRITERION
Conform to
Health,
Legally
Distribute
Economic Related
Public
Department
and
Comp. Plan
Safety,
Required
Services
Impact to Other
support
Priority
TOTAL
Welfare
Welfare
Projects
WEIGHT
3
4
4
2
2 3
3
2
LIBRARY
New Library
2 x.8
01 �4.
tl..g.::::.:.:.::::..
SCHOOL SYSTEM
Back Creek Elementary SchooI
••>:::::::.:::::::•;:•;:•::;:-;:.....::.:.......:.::.:::::::::::.�:::::::::::::::::::::::•::.::::::::::::.::.:�::::•::•>:•>::.;•:;::::1;i.�.�:::::::::::::::i:��:-:-;:�::::.:�::::::.918::.�:.�.:�:.�:::::.3&<•:•>:�s;:<:;:
f`.-8`.::•.`:•::'Y.:r..:.`...<..11.1.0.':.:;::.:.:.•.:::::-::::::.::::`..:�:.'2`"t.iq`:.:.:..:.?.':..:'%:`:.
#
:?!
•':"•New
:%:<:•::.-�'':c>•''%::::?Y`:::;:?'''::8i::ii
::•.�:::::::::::::.:.:...::.::::::::::::.
i:'i::::i:$:.•"iii ii::: ii:Et<i$:2;:::':i
.::.:._:.�::::._::.
i;:i::
...
Transportation Maintenance Facility
216
2/8
0/0
I/ 2
3/6 2/6
1-/3
3/6
37
Southern Elem. ScAcquisitionhoot Site
•`z�:::�::g::.�::::::::.�:::1f..A
...........:::.:�0.1.Q-:::::::::;::::::.21:4::::::.::.:....:.
James Wood Middle School Renovation
2/6
3/12
0/0
1/2
2/4 1/3
1/3
1/2
32
Third County High unt Hi School
:;::;:::':�:''::::::::'`�?:%'`
<'"::t:::
�:'::::::::f::`�":`� •::::::::.:S:�i
�'��:�i'�:%%%�:�:::�::::;:;`'':':%
ii:£i:�iSi:?�ir'::%':;`rr:� r::ii::>:::�::::';::: •: •:::.::.;:.:::
�:;:::::;:;�::.::;:::::::::'iii:;:i:;:i:`
�'�:ii:;::•:::::
Indian Hollow Elementary Addition
2/6
2-/-8
0/0
1/2
2/4 1/3
1/3
0/0
26
New Gainesbo o Elementary men School
Y
:::::<;; :36':<::::`•ii<:;:::>
... �.....:.....:::::::::
: ':; `'::' '
# f: 5............::.:Il...
;:; ...'." ?:`:::;s :'• :i3 :' :::::::"'
:.::::::::::..::.1:
:::...........
l.::.:.
;;: ?,%?> ;:i :`•ss::?............ :::';'::::::i>:>:<x:i>::»:::>r;•
::.........:. ::::::::..::::::::.:................:..::::::::::::::::..
..............................................:::::::::::..:::::::::::.::::::::::::
<:>:z::::::>iiirc>;
:<::.;:z«::<::<:»::::;::>
.:
«::;:;:;
NREP Addition
2/6
2/8
0/0
3/6
2/4 0/0
113
0/0
.... ..�.:;.>::.;;:.;
27
co Administration Building Renovations
PARKS AND RECREATION
Field House/IndoorPool
.:::.:F?`:i:#:`?:::'?:'';:;;:isi::.::::.;:;':;..,T<:;:::::::::#:'':}.?%?::i
::. 2 �:,,.
:...1. �+I :........
...............,.,
i3�if
::,.,:::::.....:.
21�:•:.;.::.;::�;:;•::•::�:•:
: „ : „ , ,.
:::::::::::::::::iE'`.�:::::i � i::::i::::<•::-%::::%::::z:?�::::::::?;::;.:;:.:::z:i;:�i::;::�i:;iii<:;::z::i:�:i::;:;::r:r'•:
r:.�:.�:::::.:::.::.:.? ::•:::�:;o:•::t:o::.:.
,:, ,,,..,,:: , �'..<:;; e:: �:.:::. � �.:.�.'•::::::.
.:::
�::::::. � : �.kt:::;?:iii:iiiiiii'r3!>(:i>8iii•::;iii::ii;.
�;:;::;�;;;:.::
7: i:::iiii::ifi
Softball Complex - SP
3/9
1/4
0/0
1/2
1/2 1/3
216
2/4
30
Baseball Field Renovations SP
: ..... .<
.:..;;...f:4
;:
<`:%<>z«<'•><:>:?::'`.::»'
.::.. ....
�.!x
<: >:z; `:>z: ::`•>3:::>;< `:>::;::><#»:>-»>:>:;:`
..... if2.....>isr�;:;.;fz1:3;:•::.::-;;;:.::.:s:.;:-2F6:;s:;::•«:<:.;::.;:;-
i:?ii::<::>:>:>:>isi>:2iiii:i:;;::<::::iii
I t�::;;;:<:.:•;•.;:•::.::.;•.;:;<::«;:�:•:
;«<i:i::i
2.::
Park Land Acquisition
3/9
1/4
0/0
4/8
1/2 1/3
2/6*
:::.:::::.:.......
010 '
•::.::: .
32
Socce - SP
r Com lex
:::.;.t ..:::'?%<::''":::;:`::::::::
`"."�:i�:: `::''[::'::i
>:%::::::':''i`''k::;:;:;:'::;::;:;:?;:":2':
.................................
•`:ii.':Z;::i::;i:•':i:%:iiii;:iz::iii
:.........:......oho..................�a..:::::.::.
ii>iii:ii::;;:ii:;z:>%>i:ii::iii:
Tennis/Basketball Complex - CB
3/9
1/ 4
0/0
316
1/2 2/6
1/3
0/0
30
Open n Play Area CB
::3i.`:.�
:;:. .fg...
i�?::i>?
....:.�.t�a:::•:>:•::.:::....(ift1...
<;`;.:;:::;:'i%':::::::'�:><':::;::':�::::::::":"�":'•:::i3:::?:'::?•'#::':::�"::::::::::::�'::i
3fFt
.............?.t.`2.....ii•:>r:::•;::11:•3rr>:.:::.;>:•::ii:�i2'f.:6;:•;;:;>::•r:o:•::;>:
::S:iiii>:i3iii:8::is'�i`.::i::;:;;i:ti:::;>;;:i;;::<;:�;;::i::�
;::i;:iii:iiii:ii;::.
:i:;<::;:.::.:
Tennis/Picnic Area - SP
3/9
1/4
0/0
1/2
0/0 2/6
2/6
0/0
27
Shelter, Stage Seating -CB
>: 3. .......
......�. ........:::�>AE
�............(
6 _
<:>:�l;�:ri:<:.<::»:::F<G>:Bi;:;i:�;1.
6� •::»2Y;�::«�
i::s«?c:::::::;t•;:i;;i.'�;��;>:::.;;:::-z;::,<n:::i.;»s>::z;z>;::;;:::.:.:.:.>•:;;;:;::•;a;;::�;:::••:
Skateboard Park
1/3
1/4
0/0
13/21/2
1/ 2 1/ 3
2/ 6
010
20
Maintenance Compound -
SP
:`
`::`.::::
':::::::;.; ::';: `.;_;:;•'::y;i :i:;ii:;: :.::i:::%ii:::<%i::iSi::
s;::•:'fii:i
:::::r ':`;......•::•
..�.::::::::::::.
.:::::•:.;
AIRPORT
Expansion
:Z;
i ii:.:::.::i
...:APron
%ii
:::i: :
r::::.;.
Route 645 Relocation -Construction
1/2 2/ 6
1/ 3
316
31
-10-
2000-2001 Departmental Request Summary
Dr� t- [ + A:- Pr,, Approved n
LCp�.11.111G11L. V�iJii�i,7ic.�ir.i ��,�"iiiiin r�in��i 1-1pY�UveL�I3y.
Dept.
Project
FY 2000
FY 2001
FY 2002
FY 2003
FY 2004
TOTAL
Priority
Title
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
CIP Cost
1
Relocate Rt
2,100,000
2,100,000
645 -
Construct
2
Upgrade
75,000
75,000
Airfield
Lighting
3
Construct
300,000
300,000
Airfield
Maint.
Bldg.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
TOTAL
2,475,000
2,475,000
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 8
_12_
filename: 2000-2001 C IPApplicationForms.wpd
2000-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM
return to: Department of Planning and Development
Frederick County, Virginia
Project Name: Route 645 Relocation - Construction Phase
Date Prepared: October 28, 1999 Agency: Winchester Regional Airport
Agency Contact Person: Renny Manuel Phone Number: 662-5786
Location of Project: Winchester Airport Magisterial District: Shawnee
■
Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes.
Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc.
Part of State Route 645 is classified as an obstruction in the Runway Protection Zone and will
require relocating south of the airport property line. Numerous pieces of property have been
purchased for the Runway Protection Zone since FY 97-98, providing enough land to grant the
necessary road easement to the Virginia Department of Transportation for this project.
Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure
to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other
planning.
The design phase of this project is the FY 2000 budget and should be started within that fiscal
year providing Federal, State and local money is available. A time frame on the actual
construction phase has not been identified.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-13-
Page 1
Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other
project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects.
Land acquisition made since FY 97-98 and the design phase were planned in conjunction with this
project.
Project Priority: 10
If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and
current status of project:
Included in the Capital Improvements Plan for 1999-2000 based on engineer's estimate in 1997.
Due to funding issues, this project was moved up a year to FY 2001 and reflects an increased cost
estimate based on 1999 dollars.
Estimate Cost (in 2000 dollars):
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
4th FY
5th FY
Beyond
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
Planning,
Surveying, &
Design
Land
Acquisition
Site
Preparation &
Improvements
Construction
2,100,000
2,1001000
Furniture and
Equipment
Other
(opening day
collection)
FOTAL
2,100,000
2,100,000
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-14-
Page 2
Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed
information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided.
Cost of comparable facility or equipment
X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor
From bids received
"Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate)
Other (please explain)
Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source.
PROPOSED FUNDING SOTTR('.F.S
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
4th FY
5th FY
Beyond
TOTAL
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
General
420,000
420,000
Fund
Other Fund
State Grants
1,680,000
1,680,000
Bonds and
Debts
Other
Fund-raising
TOTAL
2,1001000
2,100,000
Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant):
State Grant - Virginia Department of Aviation
Local Share - Local Jurisdictions
Federal funding will be requested by may not be realized.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
_15_
$1,680,000 (80%)
420,000 (20%)
Page 3
0
Project Justification:
Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of
service to be provided by the project.
N/A
Please describe the need for this project.
This is the final step in providing a full precision approach to Runway 32. The relocation will
remove the final obstruction which will allow for lower approach minimums. This will enable
aircraft to land in most all weather conditions avoiding diversion to Martinsburg, West Virginia or
Dulles Airport.
Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project.
N/A
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-16-
Page 4
Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan:
Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies?
This project is within the Airport's 20 Year Master Development Plan.
Public Health, Safety, or Welfare:
Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear
health or safety risk?
N/A
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-17-
Page 5
Legal Requirement:
Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal
requirement?
The Federal Aviation Administration requires that Runway Protection Zones be free from
obstructions. A recent survey identifies part of State Route 645 as an obstruction into this zone.
With the type of approach system recently installed at the airport, this obstruction would need to
be removed to maximize the allowable approach minimums.
Equitable Distribution of Services:
Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as
needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is
currently under served relative to other areas of the County?
N/A
■
Economic Impact:
Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would
the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have
a positive effect on the local economy?
A safer precision aircraft approach is essential in attracting corporate air traffic that are looking to
locate or are already doing business in the region thus producing additional revenues for the
airport and jobs for the region -
2000 -2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-18
Page 6
1
Coordination with other projects:
is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a
larger project?
This is the final phase of previous projects that included Land Acquisition and the design phase.
Public Support:
Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods
used to determine public support.
N/A
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
_19_
Page 7
-20-
r-
filename: 2000-2001 CIPApplicationForms.wpd
2000-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM
return to: Department of Planning and Development
Frederick County, Virginia
Project Name: Upgrade Airfield Lighting
Date Prepared: October 28, 1999
Agency Contact Person: Renny Manuel
Location of Project: Winchester Airport
Agency: Winchester Regional Airprort
Phone Number: 662-5786
Magisterial District: Shawnee
■
Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes.
Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc.
Upgrade Medium Intensity Runway Lighting (MIRL) to High Intensity Runway Lighting (HIRL)
and upgrade 2 -Box Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI) to 4 -Box PAPI.
Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure
to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other
planning.
This project should be started and completed within the same fiscal year if State funding is
available.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-21 -
Page 1
Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other
project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects_
N/A
Project Priority:
If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and
current status of project:
N/A
Estimate Cost (in 2000 dollars):
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
Ah FY
5th FY
Beyond
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
Planning,
Surveying, &
Design
Land
Acquisition
Site
Preparation &
Improvements
Construction
75,000
75,000
Furniture and
Equipment
Other
(opening day
collection)
TOTAL
75,,0007m
I
75,1!(14
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
_22-
Page 2
Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed
information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided.
Cost of comparable facility or equipment
X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor
From bids received
"Preliminary" estimate, (e.g_ no other basis for estimate, guesstimate)
Other (please explain)
Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source.
PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES
Element
1st FY
2000
2nd FY
2001
3rd FY
2002
4th FY
2003
5th FY
2004
Beyond
FY 5
TOTAL
General
Fund
15,000
15,000
Other Fund
State Grants
60,000
60,000
Bonds and
Debts
Other
Fund-raising
TOTAL
75,000
77r75,000
Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant):
State Grant - Virginia Department of Aviation $60,000 (80%)
Local Share - Local Jurisdictions $15,000 (20%)
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
- 23 -
Page 3
Project Justification:
Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of
service to be provided by the project.
N/A
Please describe the need for this project.
Recent improvements at the airport have enhanced all-weather and night time operations
capability. Included in these improvements was the recent installation and commissioning of the
airport's precision instrument landing system which has increased use of the airport by jet aircraft.
FAA in Advisory Circular No. 150/5340-24, recommends that runways with precision approaches
have high intensity runway edge lights (HI RLs) installed and that a 4 -Box visual approach aid be
installed on runways with jet operations.
Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
- 24 -
Page 4
Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan:
Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies?
This project is within the Airport's 20 Year Master Development Plan.
Public Health, Safety, or Welfare:
Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear
health or safety risk?
Upgrade of the airfield lighting system will enhance the approach system into the airport providing
pilots of faster traveling aircraft the ability to see the airport from a further distance out.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project bequests
_25_
Page 5
Legal Requirement:
Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal
requirement?
Although not mandated, this project will meet the FAA's recommendation for airports with
precision instruments landing systems.
Equitable Distribution of Services:
Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as
needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is
currently under served relative to other areas of the County?
��/
Economic Impact:
Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would
the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have
a positive effect on the local economy?
Safe and efficient approach systems into the airport attract business traffic to Winchester
especially during adverse weather conditions which could produce more revenue for the airport
and the region.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6
-26-
Coordination with other projects:
Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a
larger project?
This will project will complete the entire precision instrument landing system recently installed.
Public Support:
Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods
used to determine public support.
N/A
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-27-
Page 7
-28-
filename: 2000-2001 CIPApplicationForms.wpd
2000-2001 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
INDIVIDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUSTIFICATION FORM
return to: Department of Planning and Development
Frederick County, Virginia
Project Name: Design and Construction Airfield Maintenance Equipment Building
Date Prepared: October 28, 1999
Agency Contact Person: Renny Manuel
Location of Project: Winchester Airport
Agency: Winchester Regional Airport
Phone Number: 662-5786
Magisterial District: Shawnee
Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes.
Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc.
This project includes demolition of an old and undersized wooden structure formerly used to
house maintenance equipment and design and construction of a new facility. It will be large
enough to accommodate the airport's maintenance equipment and designed to allow staff to
perform maintenance work.
Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure
to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other
planning.
This project should be started and completed within the same fiscal year providing State funding
is available.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
- 29-
Page 1
Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any other
project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects.
N/A
Project Priority:
If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and
current status of project:
N/A
Estimate Cost (in 2000 dollars):
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
4th FY
5th FY
Beyond
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
Planning,
50,000
50,000
Surveying, &
Design
Land
Acquisition
Site
Preparation &
Improvements
Construction
1250,000
250,000
Furniture and
Equipment
Other
(opening day
collection)
I'QTAL300,000
300,000
Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed
information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided.
Cost of comparable facility or equipment
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 2
-30-
X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor
From bids received
"Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate)
Other (please explain)
Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source.
PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES
Element
1st FY
2000
2nd FY
2001
3rd FY
2002
4th FY
2003
5th FY
2004
Beyond
FY 5
TOTAL
General
Fund
210,000
210,000
Other Fund
State Grants
90,000
90,000
Bonds and
Debts
Other
Fund-raising
TOTAL
=300,000
300,000
Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant):
State Grant - Virginia Department of Aviation Design $40,000 (80%)
Local Share - Local Jurisdictions 10,000 (20%)
State Grant - VDOA Construction (at this time only 1,250 sf is eligible for reimbursement
based on estimated $50 sf) $50,000 (80%)
Local Share - Local Jurisdictions $200,000 (20%)
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-31-
Page 3
s
Project Justification:
Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of
service to be provided by the project.
N/A
Please describe the need for this project.
Continuing expansion and improvements to the airport increased the demand to provide larger
and more reliable maintenance equipment. The airport owns various pieces of equipment and
vehicles to handle aircraft towing, deicing equipment, cutting grass, snow removal, airfield and
building maintenance. Room to store and maintain vehicles and equipment is inadequate resulting
in the airport having to use two aircraft t -hangars that could be generating over $4,300 annually in
revenue. In an effort to streamline operations and reduce cost, two staff positions were created
for maintenance technicians that perform maintenance on all airport owned buildings and
equipment. One t -hangar is used for a shop and does not provide adequate electrical service,
heat, water or sewer utilities. The wooden structure previously used as a maintenance building is
old, undersized, unstable and was not constructed for the purpose of maintaining the types of
equipment used by the airport nor does it have any electric, water or sewer. The other t -hangar
contains no electric, water or sewer.
■
Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project.
N/A
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 4
-32-
Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan:
Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies?
This project is within the Airport's 20 Year Master Development Plan.
Public Health, Safety, or Welfare:
Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a clear
health or safety risk?
This facility will provide a safe, appropriate and efficient working environment for airport
maintenance technicians to service and maintain airport equipment.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-33-
Page 5
Legal Requirement:
Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal
requirement?
N/A
Equitable Distribution of Services:
Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified as
needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that is
currently under served relative to other areas of the County?
N/A
Economic Impact:
Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would
the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have
a positive effect on the local economy?
An airfield maintenance building will allow the airport to generate over $4,300 by leasing the
hangars currently used for maintenance.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 6
-34-
r �r
Coordination with other projects:
Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a
larger project?
MEN
Public Support:
Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods
used to determine public support.
N/A
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-35-
Page 7
-36-
2000-01 Departmental Request Summary
Department: Parks and recreation Approved By:
Dept.
Project
FY 2000
FY 2001
FY 2002
FY 2003
FY 2004
TOTAL
Priority
Title
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
Cost
CIP Cost
1
Field
House/Indo
ar
or Pool*
N/A
N/A
2
Softball
Complex
Sherando
447,735
447,735
3
Parkland
West. FC
1,224,238
1,224,238
4
Baseball
Complex
Renov.
917,812
917,812
5
Soccer
Complex
1,043,986
1,043,986
6
Open Play
Areas
442,078
442,078
7
Tennis/Bas
ketball
349,408
349,408
8
Skateboard
Park/In-
Line
Hockey
426,231
426,231
9
Tennis/Picn
is Area
564,392
564,392
10
Shelter/Sta
ge Seating
346,309
346,309
11
Maint.
Com. &
Office
178,679
178,679
12
Park Land
East. Fred.
2,000,000
2,000,000
Co.
TOTAL
1,224,238
1,365,547 t
442,078
1,393,394 1
3,515,611117,940,868
*Note: Feasibility study to be completed prior to project scope determination.
-37
-38-
PLAN
[ND'MDUAL DESCRIPTION AND JUS'1I CATIOiVV FORM
reLtarn to: Department of Planning and Developrnent
Frederick County, Virginia
PrQ4ect Name:
D. 1000/99 ..
Agency Contact Person: Tnmec M noran Phone Number:
Location of Project: ShPranrin park Magisterial District: n egjinn
- r
Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes.
Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc.
Renovate existing ball fields (4) - Grading, seeding, infield renovation; partial fencing and new
backstops; new lighting (required by Little League, Inc.); drainage control and upgrade support
facilities.
o.
Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure
to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other
planning.
This project is reflected in the Master Plan for Sherando Park which was completed in 1987.
The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed
during the 2000-01 fiscal year.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-39-
Page I
Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any
other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects.
Renovation of this facility cannot be completed until the softball complex on the northside of Rt.
277 has been completed.
Project Priority: 4
If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and
current status of project:
Previously listed as #4.
0
Estimate Cost (in 2000 dollars):
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
4th FY
5th FY
Beyond
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
Planning,
Surveying, &
Design
Land
Acquisition
Site
Preparation &
609,861
609,861
Improvements
Construction
300,000
300,000
Furniture and
7,951
7,951
Equipment
Other
(opening day
collection)
TOTAL�l
0
1 917,812
1 77
0 1
0
1 011
917,812
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-40-
Page 2
Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed
information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided.
Cost of comparable facility or equipment
X From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor
From bids received
"Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate)
Other (please explain)
Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source.
PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
4th FY
5th FY
Beyond
TOTAL
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
General
Fund
917,812
917,812
Other Fund
State Grants
Bonds and
Debts
Other
Fundraising
TOTAL
0
917,812
0
0
0
0
917,812
Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant):
There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would
need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds
generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become
available, they will be actively pursued by this department.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-41-
Page 3
Project Justification:
Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of
Service W VG F1 viu�u Vy uiv k. -J..-...
This facility, presently serving as both youth baseball and adult softball fields, would be used by
the "Little League" programs within the Sherando Park service area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, the athletic complex will also be used by the Frederick County school
system.
Please describe the need for this project.
In its present design, the four field complex does not provide adequate diamond configuration or
grading scheme to facilitate youth baseball programs. The renovation of this complex would
correct these problems and bring those fields up to the recommended standards.
Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project.
The project location would be at Sherando Park which is currently owned by Frederick County.
Presently, Sherando Park has six baseball/softball fields.
This project would involve the renovation of the existing ball field complex. With the site of the
new county high school being adjacent to Sherando Park, there will be a joint use of these
facilities and with the renovation of the fields, athletic programs can be more effectively
facilitated.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-42-
Page 4
Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan:
Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies?
The renovation of the Baseball Complex at Sherano Park meets the following County
comprehensive planning goals:
• Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and
social well-being, and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete
program of parks and recreation.
• Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available
funding.
• Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and
rural areas.
• Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational
facilities and activities.
• Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth.
• Provide support to travel and tourist related activities.
• Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs.
The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities,
as well as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county.
Additionally, the project is identified in the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987.
Public Health, Safety, or Welfare:
Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a
clear health or safety risk?
The renovation of the Baseball Complex at Sherando Park will provide a safe facility to meet the
demands of the county's growing baseball program.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-43-
Page 5
Legal Requirement:
Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal
requirement?
The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the
adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development and completes one
element of the Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987.
Equitable Distribution of Services:
Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified
as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that
is currently under served relative to other areas of the County?
The project would correct original design problems for the facility and provide a facility to meet
the demands of the growing youth baseball program in the County. Additionally, the renovation
of the facility will permit more efficient use of the site. The facility would also be used by the
school system.
■
Economic Impact:
Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would
the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have
a positive effect on the local economy?
Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a
primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community.
The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the
community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services
contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive
work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and
travel industry.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-44-
Page 6
®■ 01111111111
Coordination with other projects:
Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a
larger project?
The renovation of the Baseball Complex at Sherando Park cannot be completed unitl the softball
complex on the northside of Route 277 has been completed. The project is part of the adopted
Master Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987,
��
Public Support:
Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods
used to determine public support.
The project has been identified by the Parks and Recreation Commission and the County's
Capital Improvements Plan. Additionally, the project has been identified as part of the Master
Plan for Sherando Park completed in 1987 to satisfy existing recreational demands and needs of
the residents.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-45-
Page 7
-46-
2On. 0-il CAPITAL IMPRrUVN.,Vi.[:N S PLAN
IND[VIDUAL DESCRIP'rON AND JUUTIF[CATION FORD
rel,urn to: Department of Planning and Development,
Frederick County, Virginia
Agency Contact Person: I Tampa M Dnran Phone Number: W-5678
Location of Project: Faatc rn Frederick County Magisterial District: Raatern Fred Cn
w� t
Project Description: Give a brief (1-2) paragraph description of what the project includes.
Provide basic information, such as the location, size, acreage, floor area, capacity, etc.
Acquisition of Parkland; 100-200 acres
N
Schedule: If the project will take several years to complete, outline the schedule here. Be sure
to include any work that might have been done in previous years, including studies or other
planning.
The Parks and Recreation Commission is requesting that this project be funded and completed in
FY 2003-04.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-47-
Page 1
Coordination: If the project is dependent upon or is being planned in conjunction with any
other project(s), identify it/them and indicate the relationship between the projects.
This project is not dependent upon any other project planned.
.. .. ............ _ ..
Project Priority: 12
If previously included in the Capital Improvements Plan, please indicate previous priority and
current status of project:
Not previously listed.
Estimate Cost (in 2000 dollars):
PROPOSED EXPENDITURES
Element
1st FY
2nd FY
3rd FY
4th FY
5th FY
Beyond
Total
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
FY 5
Planning,
Surveying, &
Design
Land
Acquisition
2,000,000
2,000,000
Site
Preparation &
Improvements
Construction
Furniture and
Equipment
Other
(opening day
collection)
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
2,000,000
0
2,000,000
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-48 -
Page 2
Basis of Cost Estimates: Check one of the following. If you want to provide more detailed
information on the estimate, please do so in the space provided.
Cost of comparable facility or equipment
From cost estimate provided by an engineer, architect, or vendor
From bids received
X "Preliminary" estimate, (e.g. no other basis for estimate, guesstimate)
Other (please explain)
Source of Funding: Indicate the projected amount for each funding source.
PROPOSED FUNDING SOURCES
Element
1st FY
2000
2nd FY
2001
3rd FY
2002
4th FY
2003
5th FY
2004
Beyond
FY 5
TOTAL
General
Fund
2,000,000
2,000,000
Other Fund
State Grants
Bonds and
Debts
Other
Fund raising
TOTAL
0
0
0
0
2,000,000 — T�0
2,000,000
Please describe the source of funding (i.e. type of grant):
There are presently no federal or state grant monies available. As a result, this project would
need to be funded through the County Capital Improvement Fund, by donations or by funds
generated through the collection of proffers. If federal, state or any other grant monies become
available they will be actively pursued by this department.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-49-
Page 3
Project Justification:
Please project the number of persons, dwellings, students, or units to be served or the units of
service to be provided by the project.
This project would be located in the primary growth center of Frederick County, within the
existing urban development area and the approved Southern Frederick Land Use Plan, which
consists of 1,200 acres of new residences.
The project could be used by the entire Frederick County area, but the principal users would be
from the eastern Frederick County area. The location of this project in eastern Frederick County
will also serve to reduce the traffic burden in other areas by providing facilities and services in
closer proximity to the residents.
Please describe the need for this project.
To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed
to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors
Plan.
Please describe and justify the proposed location of the project.
Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the eastern portion of Frederick County. The
location of this project would provide parkland which could be developed to create more
accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents of eastern Frederick County.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-50-
Page 4
Conformance to the Comprehensive Plan:
Does the project conform to, or contribute to the attainment of the goals and objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan? Is the project consistent with established policies?
The Parkland acquisition in eastern Frederick County meets the following County comprehensive
planning goals:
• Contribute to the physical, mental, and cultural needs of the community, its economic and
social well-being; and its sense of civic pride and social responsibility through a complete
program of parks and recreation.
• Provide recreational programs and activities based on identified needs and available
funding.
• Ensure that appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided in urban and
rural areas.
• Continue to develop the County's regional parks as a major source of recreational
facilities and activities.
• Support a business climate conducive to economic activity and orderly economic growth.
• Provide support to travel and tourist related activities.
• Identify and protect important natural resources.
• Facilities and services should be carefully planned to meet projected needs.
The project meets policy recommendations for the development of parks and recreation facilities,
insuring that adequate and appropriate open space and recreational facilities are provided, as well
as supporting economic development and the travel and tourism industry in the county.
Public Health, Safety, or Welfare:
Does the project improve conditions affecting health, safety, or welfare? Does it eliminate a
clear health or safety risk?
The acquisition of Parkland in eastern Frederick County ensures the adequate provision of open
space, and will provide the citizens of the county with an area that will contribute to their
physical and mental well being, as well as improving the quality of life in Frederick County.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests Page 5
_51_
Legal Requirement:
Is the project required in order to meet a State or Federal mandate or some other legal
requirement?
The project is not mandated by state or federal requirements, but is in compliance with the
adopted County Comprehensive Plan for recreational facility development.
Equitable Distribution of Services:
Does the project meet a special need of some segment of the population that has been identified
as needing assistance? Would the project provide equivalent services to a population group that
is currently under served relative to other areas of the County?
The acquisition of parkland in eastern Frederick County would service the needs of the citizens
of the entire county, but the residents in the urban development area would be provided services
that only exist at Clearbrook and Sherando Parks.
Economic Impact:
Is the project essential to, or would it encourage some form of economic development? Would
the project improve the tax base, reduce operating expenses, produce revenue, or otherwise have
a positive effect on the local economy?
Studies have shown that the provision of park and recreational facilities and programs are a
primary consideration when locating or expanding business development within a community.
The financial investment in recreation projects and services pay dividends throughout the
community equating to a higher return than the original outlay. Parks and recreation services
contribute to the physical and mental well being of the citizens, provide for a more productive
work force and preventative health services, as well as serving as a catalyst for the tourism and
travel industry.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-52-
Page 6
Coordination with other projects:
Is the project necessary for the successful completion of other projects? Is the project part of a
larger project?
The acquisition of Parkland in eastern Frederick County is not dependent upon another project.
■
Public Support:
Are county residents fully informed and supportive of the proposed project? List the methods
used to determine public support.
The acquisition of Parkland in eastern Frederick County has been identified by the Parks and
Recreation Commission.
2000-2001 Capital Improvements Plan Project Requests
-53-
Page 7
-54-
•
•
i
ITEM #2
SEWER AND WATER SERVICE AREA (SWSA) EXPANSION REQUEST
INVESTMENT LAND TRUST
Please find included under this agenda item a memorandum from Stephen M. Gyurisin to Evan Wyatt,
dated October 30, 1999, a location map and plat map depicting a 50.786 -acre tract owned by Arthur
H. Fulton, Inc., a letter from the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) to Steve Gyurisin,
dated September 21, 1999, and information from the October 19, 1999 Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) Location and Design Public Hearing for a segment of Fairfax Pike (Route
277) at the intersection with White Oak Road (Route 636). On behalf of Investment Land Trust, W.
Gyurisin has requested that consideration be given to allow for the expansion of the Sewer and Water
Service Area (SWSA) to incorporate an eight acre portion of the 50.786 -acre tract.
Currently, the county's SWSA boundary includes properties of the north side of Fairfax Pike and on
the west side of White Oak Road; therefore, this boundary is located directly across White Oak Road
from the 50.786 -acre tract. The 50.786 -acre tract is within an area that was identified for a potential
land use study during the 1998 Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors Retreat. The area
that was identified is bound by Fairfax Pike to the south, Front Royal Pike (Route 522 South) to the
north and east, and White Oak Road to the west. The Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors considered this area as a lower priority that the recently adopted Southern Frederick
Land Use Plan area, and the ongoing Northeast Land Use Study.
The FCSA has identified the infrastructure within proximity of the 50.786 -acre tract and advised Mr.
Gyurisin that there is limited capacity in the three-inch sewer force main which would most likely be
required to be upgraded if new development occurred in this area. Furthermore, the FCSA has stated
that their ability to provide service to this property is contingent upon the Board of Supervisors
inclusion of this tract into the SWSA. The VDOT Location and Design Public Hearing identifies
improvements that will occur at the intersection of Fairfax Pike and White Oak Road and projects
average daily traffic counts to increase from 9,400 to 16,600 at this location by the year 2020.
Staff has invited Mr. Gyurisin to address the CPPS during the November meeting. The CPPS will
ultimately be asked to forward a recommendation to the Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors. This recommendation could be made during the November meeting or at a subsequent
meeting should the CPPS desire that staff obtain additional information or conduct further research
regarding this request.
-55-
-56-
To: Aft. Evan Wyatt, Deputy Director
CC: Investment Land Trust
From: Stephen M. Gyurisin
Date: 10/30/99
Re: Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) boundary adjustment.
On behalf of Investment Land Trust, we request an adjustment of the Sewer and
Water Service Area (SWSA) boundary,
Th ::Property owned by Investment Land Trust is located on the Northeast comer of
the: intersection Route 277, Fairfax Pike, and Route 636, White Oak Road. The
propel ty:'is identified as Tax Map Number 86, Parcel Number 156 and currently
cons i.sts..o f
50.786 acres. The entire property is zoned Rural Area (RA) and is
.............
undeveloped. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) provides sewer
,Ahd':Watet service. A letter regarding sewer and water service from the FCSA is
attached: for your review.
. ............ ..
............
The: area requested for adjustment of the SWSA consists of approximately 8 acres
and is highlighted on the attached survey.
I have enclosed information regarding our request for you committee review.
Should you require any additional information, please call.
_57-
-58-
WEARNM ARE MAGNEMC
$.SCALE r. aw
3.O-ntim itwr or wAY3 Am
EM/T8 BF ANY. ARE NOT S1MN
4.TAX IMP 69-A4136
O.DAMW AS 3W-IVN HERECH 13 ACCOMING
TCD D -CUIQI-ED INFCnMATXN AND M A
C FMI.NT FILL SLnVCY
ILEoE�lo=I'
a.Z" put FCtt6`o
16." mm a!T
c .POaT
,2.TMPLE SND M OAK STtW
fPiEE
�.LGCUST StNM
4-,;,Z-'37J,Z3CN TDA
3;"0.zr3 _ ° for
149.93- E
�'00 �Ae�L�,Q
4460 'ot°t
[UPT,
s=r43-w
158.44' 17arAU
`��e58•�5 14442-
83'7 �9 317'457
d®. JC4IN Z/CSE
BAYLISS
I
d2�L
50.786 ACRES
--saaeora
ZSI'' 1`6Y
�.. $2.2
16Z7O. -w
s;"4S'W
�!1
-2304
O b 39.i12'ro8`yy
� j N 7 \ •Cyr.
i
� U
f ZE
V. a
e�0SALTyC)f
t g.,4A,5
6 3
s
� s• gyp'
c
rwxuKt KNE wuw > t
UND
SOLINDARY SLI?VEY OF A 50.786 ACHE TRACT OF LAND;
�� •;;��;;.++
.: STAMNG IN THE XAME OF ARnM H. FULTON, INC AS
RECORDED 1N DEED EOOK 9523. PAGE #350.
LCC-4TM CN TNF. FIST SW CSF Sn-E ROUTS 0636 AND CH ME
1iC7RM SIO£ C r 3=TrRCU TE NZ77. ALiOUT Z MLE3 EAST G rSTED
CIT r. N Tiff tJi°iOili3al U4013TEML. DI37=T Cf FREDVWCX G0twr7.
MORRIS and NEWMAN
o t omak
Pmfessbmi Land &"eyom
ML JaCkSCR Vf9kta 22842
Cin (fer * Hand Tiffs z71h
(703) 477.3730
Day Of SCPTFUBER 1993
,148 NO. FOG-A456
(703) 459-5676
.IRG;MM FREMEX CCUNTY. SCT.
&W
nmtrunmi mt �►�dlln.��oras pr to ane rn tine
ue
Ml
at =12t3l4i=
and with certificate of ackmt tlbrlt>t0 enneROd
was admitted to retard. Tax 6mpsrd by Sac. 50.54.1 d
3 . wW -s•54 have bawl p71d , it assesuW 5 9 -
-60-
FREDERICK COUNTY
SANITATION AUTHORITY
P.O. Boz 1877
Winchester VA 22604-8377
JAMES T. ANDERSON, Chairman
ROBERT N. CARPENTER, Vice-chairman
ROBERT F. MOWERY, See -treasurer
ESTEN O. RUDOLPH, III
JOHN STEVENS
GREGORY W. HEWITT
September 21, 1999
Mr. Steve Gyurisin.
G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc.
200 North Cameron Street
Winchester VA 22601
REFERENCED
Dear Mr. Gyurisin:
Investment Land Trust
Wellington H. Jones, P.E.
Engineer -Director
Ph. - (540) 868-1061
Fax. - (540) 868-1429
I have reviewed your request for water and sewer services to the referenced tract. The Authority has
water and sewer services available to this property. There is a 12 -inch water line along Route 277
and a 3 -inch force main along Route 636. This force main has limited capacity. The capacity
required by the planned development may require the developer to enlarge the force main.
The Authority cannot agree to provide services to this tract until the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors places it within the Water and Sewer Service Area or grants permission for the
Authority to provide service.
If you have any questions, please call me.
/ths
Sincerely yours,
;
W. H. Jones, P. E.
Engineer -Director
-61-
WATER
61_SVA vR AT YOUR SERVICE
-62-
Metric Plans 2
Design Need 2
Project Description 2
ight of Way 12
Cost
3
Environmental Issues 3
i
RemainingAction 3
Additional Information 14
I N TR0DUGT10N
The purpose of this Location and
Design Public Hearing is to provide
an opportunity for any person, act-
ing on their own behalf or repre-
senting a group or governing body,
to offer comments or submit written
material concerning the proposed
improvements to Route 277. All
comments received, both written
and verbal, will be included in a
transcript for review. Questions
and concerns will be reviewed
prior to consideration by the Com-
monwealth Transportation Board.
Location of proposed Improvements
Map Not to Scale
Representatives from the Virginia
Department of Transportation
(VDOT) are here to discuss your
concerns and answer your ques-
tions. Pre -addressed comment
sheets are available for written
comments and must be received no
later than 10 days (October 29,
1999) after the hearing. Verbal
comments will also be taken at the
hearing.
J
��-�,-
.'
., �. ..,� ::..: :. .. • ..r � ..—..anti ..t. _. .. _. ... ...
The Virginia Department of Transportation has
initiated the development of plans in metric units
for all projects such as the one being discussed
at this meeting.
In order to aid in the understanding of our pro-
posed project, all written information
A provided at this meeting will be
given in both metric and imperial
units. A disposable scale is available
to measure dimensions in feet from
lux our metric plans.
Design Needs
This project will improve the site distance on the north side
of Route 277 and establish a right turn lane on the northeast
side of the intersection of Route 277 and Route 636 in Fre-
derick County.
Project Description
This project will reduce the slope of the bank lo-
cated on the north side of Route 277 so that the
sight distance will be improved. The project
also requires the relocation of some existing util-
ity poles and other equipment. A right turn lane
on the north side of Route 277 is to be con-
structed onto Route 626.
Right of day
At the present time one family will be displaced
as a result of this project. No businesses or non-
profit organizations will be displaced as a result
of this project.
This alignment has been established in accor-
dance with current design standards and de-
signed to minimize impacts on existing proper-
ties. Development of the final alignment will
take into consideration the comments from this
public meeting and the written comments re-
ceived.
As we further finalize the project development,
additional easements for utility relocations may
be required beyond the proposed or existing
right of way shown on the public hearing plans.
Property owners will be informed of the exact
location of the easements during the right of way
acquisition process, prior to construction.
6'10— Variable 30 Existing _6
1 (1.8m) 1 (3.0m) AM
Route 277
Projec# Cost
The total estimated cost for this project is ap-
pro dmately $85,830. This includes preliminary
engineering, right of way and construction
Anticipated Impacts
During construction, traffic and access to all ad-
joining properties will be maintained and every
reasonable effort will, be made to protect the en-
vironment from dust, silt and erosion. No need
for road closure or detours is anticipated. Upon
completion of the project, all disturbed unpaved
areas will be seeded.
Environmental
This project is currently being coordinated
through the State Environmental Review Process
(SERF). The SERP provides state environmental
resource agencies an opportunity to comment on
highway improvements at the initial stages of the
roject. Comments and concerns from these
state agencies will be considered as the project
progresses through the development stages.
This following is a proposed tentative schedule:
Review and evaluate public comments:
Fall 1999
Consideration for approval by the
Commonwealth Transportation Board:
Fall 1999
Acquisition of Right of Way:
Winter 1999
Advertise for Construction:
Summer 2000
Project: 02 Z7-034-104,P£-101,RW-201,M-501
Federal Project: STP -277-8 ( )
_65 -
ADDITI0NAL INFORMATION
Project information will be available for review at the following locations:
VDOT Staunton District Office
Commerce Road (Route 11 Bypass)
near the North Corporate Limits
of the City of Staunton
Telephone: (540) 332-9075
Virginia Department of Transportation
e Keepfill I=
Virginia Mo
a ,� !
-66-
•
•
C:
ITEM #3
NORTHEAST LAND USE STUDY DISCUSSI®N
Staff conducted a Corel Presentation for the Northeast Land Use Study during the October 13, 1999
Board of Supervisors meeting. The purpose of this presentation was to provide an overview of the
study area, discuss a proposed approach and time line for accomplishing the land use study, and to
ensure that there was consensus among the Board prior to the CPPS beginning this task. Staffwould
like to make a similar presentation to the CPPS for informational purposes, review the proposed time
line to allow the CPPS to plan for upcoming meetings, and advise the CPPS of information that has
been developed to date that will be utilized for analytical purposes.
-67-
-68-
LAND USE STUDY APPROACH
The Board of Supervisors adopted the following approach to accomplish the Northeast Land Use
Study during their October 13, 1999 meeting. Staff would like to review this approach with the
CPPS to ensure that the various tasks and timetables are appropriate.
gMach
1) Establish a study area boundary as recommended by the CPPS and present to the Board of
Supervisors for concurrence. (October 1999)
2) Undertake a tour of the study area with the CPPS. (November 1999)
3) Develop thematic mapping information for the study area to include existing and proposed
transportation systems, utilities, zoning, land use, political, environmental, and historic
coverages. (November - December 1999)
4) Conduct two visioning meetings to obtain input from the general public regarding the issues
of concern within the study area. Send notification to all property owners within the study
area boundary and to organizations advising them of the locations and dates of the visioning
meetings. Organizations shall include the Economic Development Commission Business
Attraction Committee, the Industrial Parks Association, the Chamber of Commerce, the Top
of Virginia Builders Association, the Frederick County Farm Bureau, Clearbrook Citizens for
Safety, and other identified organizations. (January 2000)
5) Conduct a work session with the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, and CPPS.
Present the results of the visioning meetings and receive direction and general comments from
the Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission. (February 2000)
6) Work with the CPPS to develop various land use study alternatives based on input received
from the various information meetings and to develop a preferred alternative land use plan.
(March - May 2000)
7) Conduct a final work session with the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, and CPPS
to finalize the preferred land use plan alternative. (May 2000)
8) Conduct two additional public information meetings to present the preferred land use plan
-- alternative for information and discuss purposes. (June 2000)
9) Hold public hearings at the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisor levels for
adoption of the land use plan. (July 2000)
-69-
-70-