The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 01-16-19 Meeting Agenda AGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building Winchester, Virginia January 16, 2019 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Adoption of Agenda: Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission should adopt the Agenda for the meeting ................................................................ (no tab) 2) Meeting Schedule & Adoption of Bylaws & Roles & Responsibilities 2019 ................. (A) 3) November 7, 2018 and December 5, 2018 Minutes ........................................................ (B) 4) Committee Reports .................................................................................................. (no tab) 5) Citizen Comments .................................................................................................... (no tab) ACTION ITEM 6) Rezoning #04-18 for Tasker Road and Warrior Drive Commercial Properties, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 (General Business) District with proffers to the B2 (General Business) District with revised proffers and 0.62+/- acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers. The properties are located in the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior Drive in the Opequon Magisterial District and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 75- A-104 and 75-A-104E. Ms. Perkins .................................................................................................................... (C) INFORMATION/DISCUSSION 7) 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP is a prioritized list of capital projects requested by various County Departments and Agencies. The Plan is created as an informational component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Ms. Perkins ....................................................................................................................... (D) 8) Other Adjourn Commonly Used Planning Agenda Terms Meeting format Citizen Comments – The portion of the meeting agenda offering an opportunity for the public to provide comment to the Planning Commission on any items not scheduled as public hearing items. Public Hearing– A specific type of agenda item, required by State law, which incorporates public comment as a part of that item prior to Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors action. Public hearings are held for items such as: Comprehensive Plan policies and amendments; Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance amendments; and Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit applications. Following the Public Hearing, the Planning Commission will take action on the item (see below). Action Item–There are both public hearing and non-public hearing items on which the Planning Commission takes action. Depending on the actual item, the Planning Commission may approve, deny, table, or forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding the agenda item. No public comment is accepted during the Action Item portion of the agenda. Information/Discussion Item– The portion of the meeting agenda where items are presented to the Planning Commission for information and discussion. The Planning Commission may offer comments and suggestions, but does not take action on the agenda item. No public comment is accepted during the Information/Discussion Item portion of the agenda. Planning Terminology Urban Development Area or UDA – The UDA is the county’s urban growth boundary identified in the Comprehensive Plan in which more intensive forms of residential development will occur. The UDA is an area of the county where community facilities and public services are more readily available and are provided more economically. Sewer and Water Service Area or SWSA – The SWSA is the boundary identified in the Comprehensive Plan in which public water and sewer is or can be provided. The SWSA is consistent with the UDA in many locations; however the SWSA may extend beyond the UDA to promote commercial, industrial, and institutional land uses in area where residential land uses are not desirable. Land Use – Land Use is the nomenclature which refers to the type of activity which may occur on an area of land. Common land use categories include: agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial. Zoning District - Zoning district refers to a specific geographic area that is subject to land use standards. Frederick County designates these areas, and establishes policies and ordinances over types of land uses, density, and lot requirements in each zone. Zoning is the main planning tool of local government to manage the future development of a community, protect neighborhoods, concentrate retail business and industry, and channel traffic. Rezoning – Rezoning is the process by which a property owner seeks to implement or modify the permitted land use activities on their land. A rezoning changes the permitted land use activities within the categories listed above under Land Use. Conditional Use Permit or CUP - A CUP allows special land uses which may be desirable, but are not always appropriate based on a location and surrounding land uses. The CUP requested use, which is not allowed as a matter of right within a zoning district, is considered through a public hearing process and usually contains conditions to minimize any impacts on surrounding properties. Ordinance Amendment – The process by which the County Code is revised. Often the revisions are the result of a citizen request with substantial justification supporting the change. Amendments ultimately proceed through a public hearing prior to the PC forwarding a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. County Bodies Involved Board of Supervisors or BOS - Frederick County is governed by an elected Board of Supervisors composed of seven members, one from each magisterial district, and one chairman-at-large. The Board of Supervisors is the policy-making body of the county. Functions of the Board of Supervisors related to planning include making land use decisions, and establishing growth and development policies. Planning Commission or PC - The PC is composed of 13 members, two from each magisterial districts and one at-large, appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the Board of Supervisors which then takes final action on all planning, zoning, and land use matters. Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee or CPPC – The CPPC is a major committee of the PC whose primary responsibility is to formulate land use policies that shape the location and timing of development throughout the County. Included in the work are studies of specific areas to develop guidelines for future land use within those areas. The CPPC also considers requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan. Decisions by CPPC are then forwarded to the PC for consideration. Development Review and Regulations Committee or DRRC – The DRRC is the second major committee of the PC whose primary responsibilities involve the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan in the form of Zoning and Subdivision ordinance requirements. Requests to amend the ordinances to the DRRC are made by the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, local citizens, businesses, or organizations. DRRC decisions are also forwarded to the PC for consideration. A COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Director SUBJECT: Election of Officers, Committee Appointments, Meeting Schedule DATE: January 8, 2019 ________________________________________________________________________ ELECTION OF OFFICERS FOR 2019 At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission elects a Chairman, Vice - Chairman and Secretary. These three Planning Commission Officers assume office immediately and hold such office for the duration of the calendar year. For each office, the Commission will: open the nominations; accept nominations; close nominations; and, vote to fill the Officer position. ADOPTION OF MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2019 At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission adopts their meeting schedule for the ensuing year. Historically, the Commission has held meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m., to be held in the Board of Supervisors meeting room; the Comprehensive Plans & Programs Committee meets on the second Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the first floor conference room and the Development Review & Regulations Committee meets on the fourth Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the first floor conference room. The Planning Commission meeting has an inclement weather schedule, where in if weather causes the cancelation of a Wednesday evening meeting, the meeting will be held on the following Thursday evening. Memorandum: Elections, Appointments, and Meeting Times January 8, 2019 Page 2 of 2 COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS FOR 2019 At the first meeting of each year, the Chairman appoints the membership for the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) and the Development Review & Regulations Committee (DRRC). The Chairman also appoints a Planning Commission liaison to the: Transportation Committee (TC); Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB); Conservation Easement Authority (CEA); Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA); and, the Winchester Planning Commission. PLANNING COMMISSION BY-LAWS FOR 2019 At the first meeting of each year, the Planning Commission adopts their Bylaws, and Roles and Responsibilities for the ensuing year. These documents are attached. Please contact Staff should you have questions. Attachments: Proposed 2019 Planning Commission Bylaws Proposed 2019 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Planning Commission Cut-Off Dates For 2019 MTR/dw PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS County of Frederick, Virginia Adopted by the Planning Commission January 16, 2019 ARTICLE I - AUTHORIZATION 1-1 The Frederick County Planning Commission is established by and in conformance with Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County, and in accord with the provisions of Section 15.2-2210 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended. 1-2 The official title of this body shall be the Frederick County Planning Commission, hereinafter referred to as the "Commission". ARTICLE II - PURPOSE 2-1 The primary purpose of the Commission is to advise the Frederick County Board of Supervisors and to carry out all duties and functions described by the Code of Virginia, as amended. ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP 3-1 The membership of the Commission shall be determined by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as specified in Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County. Methods of appointment and terms of office shall be determined by Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County. 3-2 Within the first month of initial appointment, new Commissioner appointees shall: 1) participate in an orientation to familiarize themselves with the operations of the Department and the Commission, and 2) meet with planning staff representatives in an effort to review and better understand specific agenda items by no later than their second Planning Commission meeting. Page 2 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS 4-1 Officers of the Commission shall consist of a chairman, vice-chairman and secretary. The chairman and vice-chairman must be voting members of the Commission. The secretary shall be a member of the Commission or a county employee. 4-2 Selection 4-2-1 The officers shall be elected by the voting members of the Commission at the first meeting of the calendar year. 4-2-2 Nomination of officers shall be made from the floor. Elections of officers shall follow immediately. A candidate receiving a majority vote of the entire voting membership shall be declared elected. 4-3 Duties 4-3-1 The Chairman shall: 4-3-1-1 Preside at meetings. 4-3-1-2 Appoint committees. 4-3-1-3 Rule on procedural questions. A ruling on a procedural question by the chairman shall be subject to reversal by a two-thirds majority vote of the members present. 4-3-1-4 Report official communications. 4-3-1-5 Certify official documents involving the authority of the Commission. 4-3-1-6 Certify minutes as true and correct copies. 4-3-1-7 Carry out other duties as assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the Commission. 4-3-2 The Vice-Chairman shall: 4-3-2-1 Assume the full powers of the chairman in the absence or inability of the chairman to act. 4-3-2-2 When acting as chair, the vice-chairman shall carry out other duties as assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the Commission Chairman. Page 3 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 4-3-3 The Secretary shall: 4-3-3-1 Ensure that attendance is recorded at all meetings. 4-3-3-2 Ensure that the minutes of all Commission meetings are recorded. 4-3-3-3 Notify members of all meetings. 4-3-3-4 Prepare agendas for all meetings. 4-3-3-5 Maintain files of all official Commission records and reports. Official records and reports may be purged in accordance with applicable state codes. 4-3-3-6 Give notice of all Commission meetings, public hearings and public meetings. 4-3-3-7 Provide to the Board of Supervisors reports and recommendations of the Commission. 4-3-3-8 Attend to the correspondence necessary for the execution of the duties and functions of the Commission. 4-4 Term of Office 4-4-1 Officers shall be elected for a one-year term or until a successor takes office. Vacancies shall be filled for an unexpired term by a majority vote of the Commission. In such cases, the newly elected officer shall serve only until the end of the calendar year or until a successor takes office. 4-5 Temporary Chairman 4-5-1 In the event of the absence of both the chairman and the vice-chairman from any meeting, the Commission shall designate from among its members a temporary chairman who shall act for that meeting in the absence of the chairman or vice- chairman. Page 4 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES 5-1 The Commission shall establish committees necessary to accomplish its purpose. 5-2 In establishing committees, the Commission shall describe the purpose for each committee. 5-3 Members of the committees shall be appointed by the chairman and will serve for a term of one year. The chairman may request recommendations from the Commission or committee members on committee appointments. 5-4 Commission members, employees of the County, and citizen volunteers may be members of the committee. 5-5 The chairman and vice-chairman of the Planning Commission shall be ex-officio members of every committee. 5-6 The committees will elect a chairman and vice-chairman annually. These officers shall be current Commission members and should represent different Magisterial Districts, if possible. 5-7 The committees may operate as a committee of the whole or by executive committee, with current and past Commission members serving as members of the executive committee. 5-8 The committees may establish standing subcommittees whose activities will be a specific responsibility of the parent committee. One executive committee member will serve as liaison to the standing subcommittee and will assist staff in managing its activities. Membership will be comprised of past Commission members and citizens. Membership will be appointed by the chairman of the Committee with concurrence by the Commission Chairman. 5-9 The committees may establish working groups to assist in specific, carefully-defined tasks for a limited period of time. Important considerations for membership on the working group are skills and experience necessary to assist in providing acceptable solutions. Membership will be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee with concurrence by the Commission Chairman. Page 5 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 ARTICLE VI – COMMISSION MEETINGS 6-1 At the first meeting of each calendar year, the Commission shall fix the date, time, and place of all its regular meetings for the ensuing calendar year, and shall fix the day on which a regular meeting shall be continued should the Chairman declare that weather or other conditions make it hazardous for members to attend. 6-2 Special meetings may be called by the chairman or by the secretary after due notice and publication by the secretary. 6-3 Notice of all meetings shall be sent by the secretary with an agenda at least five calendar days before the meeting. 6-4 All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public except for Closed Sessions held in accordance with the provision specified under Section 2.2-3711(A) of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. ARTICLE VII - VOTING 7-1 A majority of voting members shall constitute a quorum. No action shall be taken or motion made unless a quorum is present. 7-2 No action of the Commission shall be valid unless authorized by a majority vote of those present and voting. ARTICLE VIII - OPERATING RULES 8-1 Order of Business for a regular meeting 8-1-1 Call to Order. 8-1-2 Adoption of the Agenda. 8-1-3 Consideration of Minutes. 8-1-4 Committee Reports. 8-1-5 Citizen Comments on Items not on the Agenda. Page 6 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 8-1-6 Public Hearings. 8-1-7 Action Items. 8-1-8 Information/Discussion Items 8-1-9 Other. 8-1-10 Adjournment. 8-2 Minutes 8-2-1 The Commission shall keep minutes of each meeting. The chairman and secretary shall sign all minutes following approval by the Commission certifying that the minutes are true and correct. Minutes made available to the public prior to formal approval by the Commission shall be clearly identified as a draft version of the meeting. 8-3 Procedures 8-3-1 Parliamentary procedure in the Commission meetings shall be governed by Robert's Rules of Order, except where otherwise specified in these procedures. 8-3-2 Whenever an agenda item involves a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors, the Commission shall continue to consider the item until a definite recommendation is made. If a motion has been made and defeated, additional, different motions may be made concerning the item under consideration. 8-3-3 The initial motion on an agenda item shall be made by a member representing the application’s Magisterial District. If both District representatives are absent or decline to make the initial motion, then any other Commissioner may act. 8-3-4 Business items on the agenda shall be considered using the following procedures: 8-3-4-1 Report by County Staff. 8-3-4-2 Presentation by Applicant. 8-3-4-3 Citizen Comment. 8-3-4-4 Applicant Response. 8-3-4-5 Staff Summary. Page 7 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 8-3-4-6 Discussion by Commission. 8-3-4-7 Motion and Action by Commission. 8-3-5 Public comment shall be allowed in all cases required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or the Code of Frederick County. In other cases, the chairman may allow public comment. 8-3-6 The Commission members may ask questions of clarification and information after the staff report, applicant presentation, and/or citizen comment. 8-3-7 Petitions, displays, documents or correspondence presented at a meeting may be made part of the official record of the meeting by motion of the Commission and are to be kept on file by the secretary. Such items need not be made part of the published minutes. 8-3-8 Public Hearings 8-3-8-1 The Commission shall hold public hearings on all items for which hearings are required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or by the Code of Frederick County. Such public hearing shall be advertised and notifications provided as required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. 8-3-8-2 The Chairman may establish special rules for any public hearing at the beginning of said hearing. These rules may include limitations on the time of staff report, applicant presentation and citizen comment. 8-3-8-3 In addition to those required by law, the Commission may hold public hearings on any matter, under the purview of the Commission, which it deems to be in the public interest. In such cases, the public hearings shall follow all procedures described for public hearing in these bylaws. 8-3-8-4 The 90-day period (Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance) for the Planning Commission to make a rezoning recommendation to the Board will start after the first Commission meeting following the referral of the amendment to the Commission. 8-3-9 Tabling 8-3-9-1 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to postpone agenda items 45- calendar days (less if reaching the limits of Section 165-102.03) Page 8 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 for any one of the following: A) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended. B) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of Frederick County. C) Insufficient information has been provided for the agenda item. D) Revised proffers have been received from the applicant less than eight (8) calendar days of the advertised Planning Commission meeting. E) Issues or concerns that arise during formal discussion of the agenda item warrant additional information or study. F) The applicant provides the Frederick County Planning Department with a written request to postpone the agenda item. G) The Frederick County Planning Department is advised of an emergency situation that prevents attendance by the applicant. H) The applicant fails to appear at the meeting in which the application has been advertised to appear. 8-3-9-2 The applicant shall be permitted to request that an agenda item be postponed from a scheduled Planning Commission meeting one time. The Planning Commission shall table the application for a specific period of time to ensure that the requirements of Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance are not exceeded unless the applicant requests a waiver from this requirement. In no case shall an application be postponed for more than 12 months from the time the complete application was received by the Zoning Administrator or applicable staff. 8-3-9-3 An application that has been postponed for an unspecified period of time shall be re-advertised for consideration by the Planning Commission once the following steps have been completed: A) The applicant has requested in writing that the agenda item be considered by the Planning Commission. B) The applicant has provided all required information to the Page 9 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 Frederick County Planning Department which addresses all concerns of the Planning Commission. 8-3-10 Work sessions 8-3-10-1 The Commission may hold work sessions at which the procedural rules of these bylaws shall not apply. 8-3-10-2 Work sessions shall be held after the adjournment of regular meetings or at the time and place set by the Commission and/or the Board of Supervisors. 8-3-10-3 Notice of work sessions shall be sent to the Planning Commissioners at least five days before the session. 8-3-10-4 The chairman shall lead the session and require orderly behavior and discussion. 8-3-10-5 No actions shall be taken or motions made at a work session. 8-3-10-6 Work sessions shall be open to the public. Public comment is not required at a work session. 8-3-10-7 The secretary shall keep a general record of all work sessions and the items discussed. 8-3-11 Adjournment 8-3-11-1 In no case shall the Commission consider any new items after 10:30 P.M. and the meeting shall be adjourned by 11:00 P.M. In the instance that an item begun before 10:30P.M. has not been acted on by the 11:00 P.M. hour, the Commission may, by majority vote, lift the adjournment time until a recommendation has been made, or such time, after 11:00 P.M., as the Commission may fix. ARTICLE IX - AMENDMENTS 9-1 These bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the entire voting membership after thirty days prior notice at any time during the calendar year. 9-2 The Planning Commission shall conduct an annual review of these bylaws each Page 10 Planning Commission Bylaws Adopted January 16, 2019 calendar year to ensure their accuracy. 9-3 At the first meeting of the calendar year, the By-Laws will be adopted. FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Adopted by the Planning Commission January 16, 2019 This document has been prepared to assist Frederick County Planning Commissioners in understanding what their role and responsibilities are in the myriad of activities that they accept as a member of the Planning Commission. This compilation is a companion document to the Commission’s By-Laws. APPLICATION COMMUNICATIONS There are three primary sources of information gathered by and weighed by the Planning Commission in order to make quality planning recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. They are ex-parte communications, staff reports and public input. Ex-Parte Communications: Individual meetings between Commissioners and an applicant/developer regarding a specific application shall follow the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. During this discussion or at any other time prior to action taken by the Commission on the application, a Planning Commissioner should make no commitments or endorsements. Any new written materials provided by the applicant to any one Commissioner shall be made available to all commissioners and staff by the applicant prior to the application appearing on the agenda. To not do so may result in the application being tabled at the Planning Commission public hearing. Staff Application Briefings/Work Sessions: Prior to the first public hearing being held, staff will hold a briefing for the Planning Commissioners, with an invitation extended to the Board of Supervisors to participate, regarding any application deemed sufficiently complicated / controversial to warrant detailed explanation. The purpose is to apprise the Commissioners regarding the details of the application, both those items that meet the ordinance and those that do not. This provides the opportunity for the Commissioners to have a common understanding of the application prior to the public hearing. The decision to hold a briefing on a specific application will be made jointly by the Director of Planning and the Chairman of the Planning Commission. In addition to complexity, the application shall be basically complete prior to scheduling the briefing. The Planning Commission may request a work session for an application which, after the first public hearing is concluded, is subsequently postponed. The purpose of the work Page 2 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Adopted January 16, 2019 session is to discuss amongst each other and with staff details of the application, any revised proffers provided or anticipated by the applicant, and other improvements which could be made to the application. For either a briefing or a work session: -The applicant should attend, but will not have an active role. -The format of a Planning Commission work session as identified in paragraph 8- 3-10 of the Commission’s By-Laws will be used. -In no case will the legal timeline for consideration before the Planning Commission be changed. Public Hearing/Meeting: Efficient and effective public hearings are an essential part of enabling the Commission to make reasoned recommendations to the Board of Supervisors. Every attempt will be made to obtain focused and broad representation of opinion or information from the public. When possible, specific time limitations will not be used. However, both rules of order as well as time constraints most appropriate for the specific application will be implemented when there is either large interest in or controversy regarding an application. One constant during this process on both the part of the public, the applicant and the Commission itself is civility and respect for information offered or a differing opinion. Deviation from this behavior is unacceptable. COMMISSIONER DEVELOPMENT: Each Commissioner shall be committed to preparing for and keeping knowledge current in order to do the most effective job for the community. New initial appointees should strive to obtain Planning Commissioner certification from an acceptable training program within the first year of appointment. This training is supported by the Planning Department budget. Further continuing education through many offerings should be pursued and will be supported by the Planning budget as possible. These opportunities should be shared amongst the number of Commissioners who are serving. Examples include PlanVirginia Page 3 Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities Adopted January 16, 2019 annual meeting, other special offerings as well as the American Planning Association’s readings and meetings. A library is maintained by the Planning office. COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE Commissioners are expected to participate in 80% of the regularly scheduled meetings per year. Members who cannot attend a meeting due to illness, business, and other governmental or family reasons should notify the Commission Chairman and/or staff Administrative Assistant prior to the scheduled meeting in order for the absence to be noted. It may affect quorum considerations. Especially essential is preparation and readiness for each of the Commission’s meetings in order to use not only the Commission’s but the staff’s and public’s time wisely. COMMISSION COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS: Appointments to a Commission committee or liaison assignments are made by the chairman and shared by the membership. Generally, they involve a once per month meeting. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Each Commissioner needs to be familiar with Commonwealth of Virginia information on conflict of interest. If a Commissioner is unsure if there is conflict, the County Attorney is the correct resource. Upon determination that there is or might be perceived to be a conflict, the Commissioner should state immediately after the agenda item is read that recusal action is necessary (with, preferably, stating the reason) then step down from the dais until the item is concluded. PUBLIC REPRESENTATION: Commissioners are citizens, too. If there is a public item that is of interest, the Commissioner should participate, but not identify themselves as members of the Frederick County Planning Commission unless acting in an official capacity and directed to do so. Implied endorsements by the Commission should be avoided. PLANNING COMMISSION CUT-OFF DATES FOR 2019 MTG. DATE CUP/REZ CUT-OFF 2nd REV CUT-OFF MDP/SUB CUT-OFF LEGAL AD STAFF MTG. STAFF CUT-OFF MAIL AGENDA 01-02-19 12-07-18 12-19-18 12-10-18 12-14-18 12-12-18 12-19-18 12-21-18 01-16-19 12-21-18 01-02-19 12-21-18 12-28-18 12-26-18 01-04-19 01-08-19 02-06-19 01-11-19 01-23-19 01-14-19 01-17-19 01-09-19 01-25-19 01-29-19 02-20-19 01-25-19 02-06-19 01-28-19 02-01-19 01-23-19 02-08-19 02-12-19 03-06-19 02-08-19 02-20-19 02-11-19 02-15-19 02-06-19 02-22-19 02-26-19 03-20-19 02-22-19 03-06-19 02-25-19 03-01-19 02-20-19 03-08-19 03-12-19 04-03-19 03-08-19 03-20-19 03-11-19 03-15-19 03-13-19 03-22-19 03-26-19 04-17-19 03-22-19 04-03-19 03-25-19 03-29-19 03-27-19 04-05-19 04-09-19 05-01-19 04-05-19 04-17-19 04-08-19 04-12-19 04-10-19 04-19-19 04-23-19 05-15-19 04-19-19 04-30-19 04-22-19 04-26-19 04-24-19 05-02-19 05-07-19 06-05-19 05-10-19 05-22-19 05-13-19 05-17-19 05-08-19 05-24-19 05-28-19 06-19-19 05-24-19 06-05-19 05-27-19 05-31-19 05-22-19 06-07-19 06-11-19 07-03-19 06-07-19 06-19-19 06-10-19 06-14-19 06-05-19 06-21-19 06-25-19 07-17-19 06-21-19 07-03-19 06-24-19 06-28-19 06-19-19 07-05-19 07-09-19 08-07-19 07-12-19 07-24-19 07-15-19 07-19-19 07-10-19 07-26-19 07-30-19 08-21-19 07-26-19 08-07-19 07-29-19 08-02-19 07-24-19 08-09-19 08-13-19 09-04-19 08-09-19 08-21-19 08-12-19 08-16-19 08-07-19 08-23-19 08-27-19 09-18-19 08-23-19 09-04-19 08-26-19 08-30-19 08-21-19 09-06-19 09-10-19 10-02-19 09-06-19 09-18-19 09-09-19 09-13-19 09-11-19 09-20-19 09-24-19 10-16-19 09-20-19 10-02-19 09-23-19 09-27-19 09-25-19 10-04-19 10-08-19 11-06-19 10-11-19 10-23-19 10-11-19 10-18-19 10-09-19 10-25-19 10-29-19 11-20-19 10-25-19 11-06-19 10-28-19 11-01-19 10-23-19 11-08-19 11-12-19 12-04-19 11-08-19 11-20-19 11-08-19 11-15-19 11-06-19 11-22-19 11-26-19 12-18-19 11-22-19 12-04-19 11-25-19 11-27-19 11-20-19 12-06-19 12-10-19 01-01-20 12-06-19 12-18-19 12-09-19 12-13-19 12-1-19 12-20-19 12-23-19 01-15-20 12-20-19 12-31-19 12-23-19 12-27-19 12-23-19 01-03-20 01-07-20 02-05-20 01-10-20 01-22-20 01-13-20 01-17-20 01-08-20 01-24-20 01-28-20 02-19-20 01-24-20 02-05-20 01-27-20 01-31-20 01-22-20 02-07-20 02-11-20 *Adjusted Date Due to County Holiday B Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3592 Minutes of November 7, 2018 MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on November 7, 2018. PRESENT: Kevin Kenney, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; Robert S. Molden, Opequon District; Gary R. Oates, Stonewall District; William H. Cline, Stonewall District; Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Shawnee District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Christopher M. Mohn, Red Bud District; Kathleen Dawson, Red Bud District; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney. ABSENT: Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; J. Rhodes Marston, Back Creek District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District. STAFF PRESENT: Michael T. Ruddy, Director; John A. Bishop, Assistant Director Transportation; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator; Shannon L. Conner, Administrative Assistant. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Kenney called the November 7, 2018 meeting of the Frederick County Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Kenney commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join in a moment of silence. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting. MINUTES Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the August 15, 2018 and September 19, 2018 meetings. ------------- Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3593 Minutes of November 7, 2018 COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) – Mtg. 10/15/18 Commissioner Mohn reported a discussion was held regarding the Carter Tract and it was unanimously voted upon to move forward. Transportation Committee – Mtg. 10/22/18 Commissioner Oates reported the committee discussed the following items at the meeting: Transportation Forum; Highway Safety Improvement Program; I-81 Corridor Study; Updates on County Projects; and Upcoming Agenda Items. Frederick Water – Mtg. 09/18/18 and 10/16/18 Commissioner Oates reported (09/18/18 meeting) the Opequon Water Supply Plan continues to advance through the design process, with 60% design drawings received from the designer on August 31; Staff review resulted in a few comments which are now being inco rporated by the design team. He Continued, the Cultural Resources field work on the water treatment plant site is underway and slated for completion next week; once the field work is assembled and report completed, the US Army Corps will be positioned to be issued their permit. Commissioner Oates shared the August operations report: Customer base is over 15,800 connections; Monthly water production averaged 6.37 mgd, a typical summer demand; Water production at the Diehl Plant has increased to 2.5 mgd ye t the quarry levels continue to rise. Commissioner Oates reported (10/16/18 meeting), Dick Helm, Executive Director of the Frederick-Winchester Service Authority, presented an update on the Green Energy plant. The Green Energy plant is a co-generation component recently constructed at the Opequon Water Reclamation Facility; the plant accepts high strength waste from our food manufacturers like HP Hood and Valley Protein, and while treating the waste, generates energy. He noted while still working out t he kinks, the energy generator is currently in operation and producing energy which reduces the quantity of electricity to be purchased from the electric companies; Frederick Water is responsible for half of the project’s $50 million debt. Commissioner Oates continued, the Town of Stephens City and Frederick Water have agreed and approved a Final Term Sheet that paves the way for entry into a Settlement Agreement; both parties agree that the Final Term Sheet and contemplated Settlement Agreement will resol ve the differences between the parties in a manner that is in the interest of both citizens of the Town of Stephens City and the customer/rate payers of Frederick Water. He explained, the Settlement Agreement not only resolves those issues raised in the pending litigation by and between the parties in the Circuit Court of Frederick County, but also creates a binding agreement between the parties to memorialize and accomplish the long-term goals and interests of both as it relates to water and sewer. Commi ssioner Oates provided the operations report for September: Customer base is over 16,000 connections; monthly water production averaged 5.74 mgd; water production at the Diehl plant has increased to 2.58 mgd yet the quarry levels continue to rise. City of Winchester – Mtg. 11/06/18 Commissioner Fieo, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported the Commission discussed an ordinance amendment, a rezoning, and CUP for an extended stay. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3594 Minutes of November 7, 2018 CITIZEN COMMENTS Chairman Kenney called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Kenney closed the citizen comments portion of the meeting. ------------- PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning #03-18 for Carpers Valley Industrial Park, submitted by Pennoni Associates, Inc., to rezone 122.18+/- acres from the R4 (Residential Planned Community) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. The properties are located approximately one mile east of I-81 on the south side of Millwood Pike (Route 50), east of Prince Frederick Drive (Route 781) and Coverstone Drive in the Shawnee Magisterial District and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 64-A-86 and 64-A-87. Action - Recommend Approval Michael T. Ruddy, Director, reported this is a request to rezone a total of 122.18+/- acres from the R4 (Residential Planned Community) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. He continued, the subject property is part of the original Carpers Valley/Governors Hill Rezoning which was approved in 2005 (revised in 2009, 2013, and 2014). Mr. Ruddy noted, Rezoning #11 -05 provided for 143 acres of commercial uses and 550 residential unites on six parcels of land (Land Bay 1 – Residential, Land Bay 2 – Commercial). He presented a locations map of the two parcels, a map of the current zoning, and a map of the future land use. Mr. Ruddy reported, the site is located within the limits of the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and depicts the subject properties with a commercial land use designation. He continued, the commercial land use designation is reflective of the commercial component of the approved mixed-use project approved for this site. Mr. Ruddy noted, the requested M1 (Light Industrial) District is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. He shared a graphic of the approved GDP. Mr. Ruddy explained, Rezoning #03-18 seeks to sever two parcels (64-A-86 and 64-A-87) from the original approved proffered rezoning and rezone them to the M1 District with a new and separate set of proffers. He noted, the primary changes proposed with this rezoning include modifications to the overall transportation network approved with the Governors Hill Rezoning that were shared by Land Bays 1 and 2. Mr. Ruddy shared the proposed GDP for the current rezoning request and explained, the Applicant is proffering: • Land Use 450,000 sf industrial uses and 805,000 warehousing (noted: in the proffer statement there is mention of high cube warehousing which is a certain component that is unique and slightly less traffic generating with the warehousing). It also gives the ability to construct all uses permitted in the M1 District and an allowance to increase the warehousing up to 1,305,000 sf with an updated TIA. Mr. Ruddy noted, it is important to recognize the proposed rezoning and the proposed proffers remove the commercial square footage trigger for the completion of Coverstone Drive. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3595 Minutes of November 7, 2018 • Architecture and Signage Similar architectural styles and signage in conformance with the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Ruddy noted, this removes the approved design modification package for the overall development that contained: streetscape design standards; landscaping/screening/open space standards; architectural standards and Architectural Review Board; height maximums, and street design standards. • Fire and Rescue $15,000 contribution at first occupancy permit, Mr. Ruddy noted that past rezoning applications have provided a monetary contribution in the amount of $0.10 per building square foot; this proposed proffer is drastically less than this calculated amount. Mr. John A. Bishop, Assistant Director Transportation, presented a graphic of the project that reflected the traffic impacts to include Transportation and Site access: • The planned road network included in the Area Plan identifies a major collector road system which provides for an east-west linkage (Coverstone Drive) which connects to Route 50 East at Inverlee Drive. • This connection offers an alternative to and relieves future congestion on Route 50 between Prince Frederick Drive and I-81. • Along with other improvements in the vicinity of the site (including future Route 522 relocated), this important network connection will allow significant traffic flow from the residential area and the approved development to Route 522 south and Winchester without traveling through the Exit 313 interchange area. Mr. Bishop shared the existing proffers and showed on mapping for Phase I and Phase II. It was noted, before anything can be built, or a CO issued in the residential section, access has to be completed from Millwood Pike; and significant cash proffers with the currently approved rezoning are, $75,000 applicable for improvements to the intersection of Victory Boulevard and Millwood Pike, and $75,000 for the intersection of Costello Drive and Prince Frederick Drive. He presented a graphic and explained the proposed proffers for this rezoning request: • Phase I – 4 lane section of Coverstone Drive from point A to point B prior to CO for up to 405,000 sf • Phase II – 4 lane section of Coverstone Drive from point B to point C prior to CO for any use exceeding 805,000 sf • Phase III – Bond or construct Coverstone Drive from point C to point D at the same time as Coverstone Drive is constructed by others from Route 50 to point D • Dedication of Tazewell Lane right-of-way for construction by others • Future right-of-way dedication along Coverstone Drive adjacent to the Army Corp of Engineers property Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3596 Minutes of November 7, 2018 • Cash remuneration to the County if the right-of-way is unavailable for offsite improvements • Offsite Improvements: (Part of Phase I) o Phase I – Restripe existing pavement to extend left turn lane on south bound Route 522 at Costello Drive o Phase I – Installation of dedicated left and right turn lanes from Prince Frederick Drive onto Costello Drive o Phase I – Installation of dedicated right turn lane on Prince Frederick Drive at Route 50 and extension of the right and left turn lanes from Route 50 onto Prince Frederick Drive Mr. Bishop explained, the proposed rezoning has significantly less traffic generation than the already approved rezoning however, it will be more trucks. He shared key transportation issues: • Implementation of the Comprehensive Planned road network • Shift of Coverstone Drive implementation and cash proffers without evidence of coordination with neighboring properties • Increased truck generation • Analysis of right-of-way needs for offsite improvements • Phase III bonding of Coverstone Drive from C to D Mr. Ruddy recognized the approved rezoning utilized commercial tax revenue generated to offset the impacts of the 550 residential unites within the development ; the Applicant has not demonstrated that the industrial square footage proposed with this rezoning will adequately offset the impacts the residential units will place on the County; and the proposed rezoning allows up to 405,000 sf of Industrial uses and 805,000 sf of High-Cube Warehouse or other Industrial uses. Commissioner Thomas commented and inquired, the future Route 522 is supposed to come in at Prince Frederick Drive, how would they connect the traffic from Coverstone Drive to the new Route 522. Mr. Bishop noted it would be a significant intersection or a roundabout. Commissioner Thomas inquired if a cash proffer is accepted by the County could it only be used for the purpose of those transportation improvements and if not approved would that cash go back to the developer. Mr. Roderick Williams, County Attorney, noted without more detailed language in the proffers that would be correct. Commissioner Thomas shared his concerns regarding tractor trailers having to make multiple turns to access major roadways and the dangers of the band angle of turning left from Prince Frederick Drive onto Route 50. Mr. Bishop noted it would be difficult to improve this intersection. Commissioner Oates commented, on the original rezoning cash proffers, there is one that states; by June 30, 2018 the right-of-way and design to be secured for Coverstone Drive to the new Route 522 is supposed to be a $20,000 cash proffer and he inquired was this proffer paid. Mr. Bishop explained no the proffer was not paid and the relocation to Route 522 was adopted by the Board of Supervisors in December 2017. Commissioner Oates asked if that would be considered a zoning violation with the existing rezoning. Mr. Ruddy explained, the responsibility for that proffer falls to all property owners associated with the original rezoning; it is an outstanding proffer therefore it is a component of the zoning ordinance specific to this property and it would need to be fulfilled before any development occurs on the property. He noted, should this rezoning move forward, this property would not be responsible for that proffered contribution, that would fall on the balance of the properties as a zoning violation and all of the other commitments that remain would be the responsibility of the remaining property owners. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3597 Minutes of November 7, 2018 Mr. Alex Westra representing Hines – Global Investment and Development presented a brief overview of the company. He noted, although a very large company, Hines remains family oriented. Mr. Westra commented the development will be a major benefit to the County. Mr. Ron Mislowsky of Pennoni Associates spoke on behalf of the Applicant. He gave an overview of how this application came forward and the prior rezoning. Mr. Mislowsky shared comments provided by County agencies. He believes the impacts associated with this rezoning have been addressed. Mr. Mislowsky noted the Applicant is agreeable to the increase to emergency services of $0.10 per sf and also not to exceed 3,100 trips per day. Chairman Kenney inquired regarding the Airport Support District and does that encompass all of the Land Bays . Mr. Mislowsky stated that it does; Business and Industrial. Chairman Kenney called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. Mr. Paul Anderson, Vice-Chairman of the Regional Airport Authority spoke in support of this application and wants to make sure the proffers are left in place pertaining to the Airport. Mr. Steve Aylor of Miller & Smith, the owners of parcels 64-A-83 and 64-A-83A, requested this item be postponed or denied. No one else came forward to speak and Chairman Kenney closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Commissioners Oates and Thomas again shared their concerns for this application; the proffers would be too expensive for residential, traffic safety, and the overall road development throughout. Upon motion made by Commissioner Ambrogi and seconded by Commissioner Dawson with two additions to the proffers: an increase to emergency services of $0.10 per sf and also not to exceed 3,100 trips per day. BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Rezoning #03-18 for Carpers Valley Industrial Park, submitted by Pennoni Associates, Inc., to rezone 122.18+/- acres from the R4 (Residential Planned Community) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. The properties are located approximately one mile east of I-81 on the south side of Millwood Pike (Route 50), east of Prince Frederick Drive (Route 781) and Coverstone Drive in the Shawnee Magisterial District and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 64-A-86 and 64-A- 87. Yes: Mohn, Dawson, Triplett, Thomas, Ambrogi No: Molden, Oates, Cline, Kenney (Note: Commissioners Manual, Unger, and Marston were absent from the meeting.) ------------- Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3598 Minutes of November 7, 2018 ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner Oates to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously passed. The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ Kevin W. Kenney, Chairman ____________________________ Michael T. Ruddy, Secretary Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3599 Minutes of December 5, 2018 MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on December 5, 2018. PRESENT: Kevin Kenney, Chairman; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; Robert S. Molden, Opequon District; Gary R. Oates, Stonewall District; William H. Cline, Stonewall District; Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Shawnee District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; J. Rhodes Marston, Back Creek District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Christopher M. Mohn, Red Bud District; Kathleen Dawson, Red Bud District; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney. ABSENT: Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District. STAFF PRESENT: Michael T. Ruddy, Director; Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning and Subdivision Administrator; M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner; Shannon L. Conner, Administrative Assistant. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Kenney called the December 5, 2018 meeting of the Frederick County Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Kenney commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to join in a moment of silence. ADOPTION OF AGENDA Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting with one change, a Resolution presentation to Ms. June Wilmot. ------------- Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3600 Minutes of December 5, 2018 COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) – Mtg. 11/19/18 Commissioner Mohn reported a discussion was held regarding CPPA #02-18 the Carter Tract and Staff provided feedback to the committee. Transportation Committee – Mtg. 11/26/18 Commissioner Oates reported the committee discussed the CIP update; unpaved roads; and an update on County projects. Frederick Water – Mtg. 11/20/18 Commissioner Oates reported the Board of Directors held a public hearing to receive public comment on the use of condemnation to acquire three sites to accommodate water system improvements that will strengthen the water service in the Lake Frederick community. He continued, the proposed elevated water storage tank and the water wells with a treatment plant will ensure that a water service with proper fire flows and pressures, and service redundancy is achieved in Lake Frederick. The improvements and sites have been identified continuously since the developer’s original 2001 Master Development Plan was approved by Frederick County, and the 2001 development agreement was entered into by the developer, Frederick Water, and Frederick-Winchester Service Authority. Commissioner Oates reported, improvements are necessary to meet the ongoing new residential construction while continuing to provide water service to existing Lake Frederick customers. He noted, the three sites being pursued are owned by either the developer (MREC Shenandoah) or the homeowner’s association (Shenandoah HOA); the developer owns the water tank site; the HOA owns the water well sites; efforts to purchase the sites have been unsuccessful. He noted, during the public hearing individuals representing both the developer and the HOA spoke in opposition to the improvements and use of condemnation to acquire the sites. Commissioner Oates shared, the Board approved a resolution authorizing the use of condemnation to secure the sites; Frederick Water will advance efforts t o construct the needed water tank so that the tank will be operational by summer 2019; the water wells and treatment will be constructed and operational by summer 2020. Commissioner Oates presented the operations report for October: customer base is over 16,000 connections; monthly water production averaged 6.02 mgd; water production at the Diehl plant has increased to 2.787 mgd yet the quarry levels continue to rise. City of Winchester – Mtg. 12/04/18 Commissioner Fieo, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported the Commission discussed a CUP request for waivers at 333 W. Cork Street; and a CUP request for off street parking at 11 Meadow Branch Avenue. CITIZEN COMMENTS Chairman Kenney called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Kenney closed the citizen comments portion of the meeting. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3601 Minutes of December 5, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING Rezoning #04-18 for Tasker Road and Warrior Drive Commercial Properties, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 (General Business) District with proffer to the B2 (General Business) District with revised proffers and 0.62+/- acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers. The properties are located in the northwest and southwest corners of th e intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior Drive in the Opequon Magisterial District and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 75-A-104 and 75-A-104E. Action - Postponed 45 days Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director presented a locations map of the property and reported, this request is to rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 District with proffer to the B2 District with revised proffers and 0.62+/- aces of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP District with revised proffers. She continued, the subject property was rezoned with proffers in 1998; the approved Rezoning #02-98 required that businesses be closed from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. Ms. Perkins explained, the Applicant is requesting to remove the hours of operation for the majority of land uses allowed in the B2 District that could be constructed on this property; hours of operation for restaurants, miscellaneous repair and amusement are proposed to be restricted from 11 p.m. – 6 a.m., all other uses could operate 24 hours. She noted, minor revisions also include updates to include SIC codes, transportation study proffer (completed during the site plan stage) and a revised fire and rescue monetary contribution. Commissioner Thomas inquired what could operate at the site 24 hours. Ms. Perkins explained it could be a convenience store, grocery store, or offices. Mr. Evan Wyatt of Greenway Engineering, representing the Applicant gave a brief overview of the request. He explained, the purpose of this request is the owner recently had a group look at the property for purchase; this group noted the limited hours of operation are a detriment to the property. Mr. Wyatt continued, with that in mind the Applicant wants to maintain the integrity of what was approved; what was done with the prohibited land uses they have maintained everything that was prohibited with the original proffers and added new commercial uses that have been approved over time that were not part of the 1998 zoning code. He noted, looking at the adjoining residential uses, the Applicant thought it would still be appropriate to keep the hours of restriction on uses that would be louder in the evening such as restaurants, bars, amusement, and recreational services. Mr. Wyatt concluded, the Fire & Rescue proffer was a one-time payment that was done with the first site plan on the other side of the road and the Applicant felt it was appropriate to make sure there was proffer money coming in for future commercial development on this side for Fire & Rescue. Commissioner Thomas reminded everyone that the restriction was put in place because of the noise concerns shared by neighbors. He is concerned how the surrounding neighborhoods will be protected from the noise; a grocery store having tractor trailers with night deliveries will create a lot of noise and there is a senior development directly behind this property. He asked how this would be explained to the neighbors. Mr. Wyatt commented, the first thing that would be explained is the proffer amendment does nothing to the requirements for the buffer and screening between the commercial property and the senior subdivision which in this case would be a six-foot-high opaque element and landscaping so that would assist with the noise levels. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3602 Minutes of December 5, 2018 Chairman Kenney inquired what square footage of buildings can fit on the property. Mr. Wyatt explained, on the 5 acre parcel the maximum would be approximately 25,000 SF and on the 16 acre parcel approximately 100,000 SF. Chairman Kenney stated, therefore $10,000 to $15,000 coul d go towards Fire & Rescue. Commissioner Thomas inquired could there be a way to arrange the buildings so the tractor trailer deliveries and parking could be on the side of the buildings rather than in the back. Mr. Wyatt responded, the orientation of the building is to face Warrior Drive; the depth of the property to have the buffer and 120 feet of depth to get to the building may dictate that it is on Tasker Road; he will have to look at the site before he could agree to that condition. Chairman Kenney called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing to come forward at this time. A neighboring resident asked where the entrance would be on the 5-acre parcel and will there be more than one entrance. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Kenney closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Mr. Wyatt displayed mapping and described the possible entrances. Commissioner Thomas commented, the neighborhoods surrounding this property trust the Planning Commission and the decisions made in the past; he cannot support this and break that commitment to the citizens. Commissioner Manuel suggested to restrict the tractor trailer delivery times from occurring in the middle of the night. Commissioner Thomas noted if that could be accomplished, he may consider this request. Commissioner Oates noted that restriction would be difficult to enforce. Chairman Kenney requested a comment from Staff. Ms. Perkins explained this could not be handled at the site plan process unless a proffered restriction was added; notes on the site plan if there were a proffer in place to restrict the hours at that time it would become an enforcement issue, if violated. Mr. Ruddy commented it would be up to the Applicant to offer this as a proffer. Mr. Wyatt concluded, reasonable comments have been made and he would prefer to have an opportunity to talk to the property owner and would agree to a postponement. Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Oates BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend postponement for 45 days of Rezoning #04-18 for Tasker Road and Warrior Drive Commercial Properties, submitted by Greenway Engineering, Inc., to rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 (General Business) District with proffer to the B2 (General Business) District with revised proffers and 0.62+/- acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers. The properties are located in the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior Drive in the Opequon Magisterial District and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 75-A-104 and 75-A-104E. (Note: Commissioner Unger was absent from the meeting.) ------------- Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3603 Minutes of December 5, 2018 INFORMATION/DISCUSSION CPPA #02-18 for the Carter Tract – Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) inclusion request and Industrial Land Use Designation request; parcels 45-A-2, 45-A-7, 33-A-144, and 33-A-89. This is a request to expand the boundary of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to include 213.8 acres of land and to designate the site for industrial land uses. The properties are currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) and the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan shows the properties as remaining rural. The properties are located north of the CSX Railroad, south of Brucetown Road, and east/adjacent to the Clearbrook quarry in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Commissioner Oates would abstain from all discussion on this item for a possible conflict of interest. Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director, reported at the Board of Supervisors meeting September 12, 2018 the Board directed Staff to undertake a Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) expansion and land use designation associated with Comprehensive Plan Amendment #02-18 for the Carter Tract. She continued, this amendment proposed to add 144 acres into the SWSA and remove 150 acres from the SWSA; this amendment also seeks to designate the 144 acres for industrial land uses. Ms. Perkins presented a locations map of the property. She explained, the CPPC discussed this amendment at their October and November 2018 meetings and the CPPC looked at the broader Brucetown Road area in determining which area would best support a sewer and water service area expansion and an industrial land use designation inclusion. Ms. Perkins presented a locations map of the property depicting what is being removed and added. Ms. Perkins reported, the CPPC at their October and November meetings discussed issues associated with the Carter Tract; specifically, the environmental features located on the site and ultimately determined it was not best suited for inclusion in the SWSA. She continued, the CPPC in discussion with the applicant agreed it would be best to shift the SWSA amendment from the Carter Tract; this change shifted the SWSA expansion north along Brucetown Road to an area more suited for industrial development. Ms. Perkins noted, the Committee ultimately endorsed the Brucetown Road Area Amendment and associated text with the amended location. Ms. Perkins concluded, the text that was endorsed by the CPPC included: • An industrial land use designation for areas identified as most appropriate for a SWSA expansion • Recognition of the road network and improvements that may be needed; specifically Brucetown/Route 11 intersection • Water and sewer capacity limitations • Protection of environmental features • Buffering between industrial uses and the rural community center • Encouragement of the use of rail Chairman Kenney requested clarification as to where the SWSA line is going to be. Ms. Perkins presented a graphic depicting the location. Commissioner Dawson commented it makes sense to do this given the land is more suitable. She noted, the name needs to be changed. Ms. Perkins clarified the name going forward is the Brucetown Road Area Amendment. Chairman Kenney inquired if there has been any follow up from Frederick Water since the August 27, 2018 correspondence. Ms. Perkins noted she has not seen another correspondence; Staff did request an update to include the different name, however in discussions with Frederick Water it was Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3604 Minutes of December 5, 2018 stated as long as it was a net zero request, they were amenable to the SWSA expansion. Commissioner Thomas commented there is basically no impact since it is a net zero request and he asked how this request transpired. Ms. Perkins noted this was a request by an outside entity to amend the SWSA. Commissioner Thomas shared his suggestion to include the more detailed discussion when presenting to the Board of Supervisors to make this easier to understand. Commissioner Dawson commented the discussion was that the Carter Tract was primarily too wet and the cost to develop would be horrendous. Chairman Kenney stated we need to make sure there is clarity on this before it can move forward, and he does not feel it is clear at this time. Commissioner Cline commented he does not feel this plan conforms with the motion made by Supervisor Slaughter and it impacts many more houses than the original request; he made a motion to send this item back to the CPPC to do the following: • Notify the landowners within 1000’ of this new area. • Provide a more detailed analysis and expectation of the transportation improvements needed to Brucetown Road and the intersection with Route 11 so the community can be assured this change of land use will work. • Obtain comments from review agencies about the Transportation, Environmental, and Water & Sewer impacts with their recommendations. • Reduce the proposed land use map for industrial development to match only the SWSA expansion. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously agreed upon to send back to the CPPC for further discussion and analysis. (Note: Commissioner Unger was absent from the meeting.) Spring Run Site Plan #22-18 (Subdivision), this application is for a subdivision design plan (site plan) for fifteen (15) single-family attached (townhouses) units planned to be constructed on 1.88 +/- acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) District with RP (Residential Performance) standards via Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) credits. The property is located at 2659 Senseny Road, Winchester and is identified with Property Identification Number 65-A-46 in the Red Bud Magisterial District. M. Tyler Klein, Senior Planner, reported this is a proposal to develop 1.88 +/- acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) to 15 single-family attached townhouses with RP (Residential Performance) standards via Transfer of Development (TDR) credits. He continued, the Applicant received a waiver of the Master Development Plan (MDP) requirements in June 2018 and has chosen to process a site plan in lieu of the MDP. Mr. Klein presented a locations map of the property. Mr. Klein explained, Rezoning Application #07-16 downzoned the property from RP (Residential Performance) to RA (Rural Areas) and removed the previously approved proffer statement. He continued, although the property is zoned RA, the Applicant will utilize the County’s Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) program to develop additional lots with RP District standards (10 credits purchased x 1.5 SFA units/credit = 15 units allowed). Mr. Klein explained, access to the site will be provided from Senseny Road via a private street (Coralyrose Court); sidewalks will be included on either side of the internal street for pedestrian connectivity within the development, a 10’ trail will be provided along the property frontage on Senseny Road; the right-of-way for the future condition of Senseny Road as a four-lane roadway is also depicted Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3605 Minutes of December 5, 2018 (as dedicated in REZ #07-16). He continued, recreational amenities (to-be-determined at the time of construction) may be provided in the form of an outdoor pavilion, playground, tot lot, or equivalent; and residential separation buffers and roadway efficiency buffers are also provided to screen the development from adjacent properties and roadways. Mr. Klein presented a locations map of the property. Mr. Klein concluded, the site plan for Spring Run is generally consistent with the requirements of the County’s Zoning & Subdivision Ordinances and is in a form that is administratively approvable. There were no questions or further discussion at this time. (Note: Commissioner Unger was absent from the meeting.) Annual Review of Bylaws and Roles and Responsibilities Michael T. Ruddy, Director, reported the Bylaws and Roles and Responsibilities are provided and asked each member to review and direct any changes to him accordingly. ------------- OTHER Cancelation of the regular meeting Chairman Kenney announced there were no pending items for the Planning Commission’s December 19, 2018 meeting. ------------- ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner Oates to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously passed. The meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ____________________________ Kevin W. Kenney, Chairman ____________________________ Michael T. Ruddy, Secretary C REZONING APPLICATION #04-18 TASKER ROAD & WARRIOR DRIVE COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: January 7, 2019 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/05/18 Public Hearing Held; Postponed Planning Commission: 01/16/19 Pending Board of Supervisors: 02/13/19 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 (General Business) District with proffers to the B2 (General Business) District with revised proffers and 0.62+/- acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers. LOCATION: The subject properties are located in the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior Drive. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 0/16/19 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is an application to rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 (General Business) District and 0.62+/- acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the B2 and RP Districts with revised proffers. The subject property was rezoned to the B2 (General Business) District with proffers in 1998. The approved Rezoning (#002-98) required that businesses be closed from 11p.m. to 6 a.m. The Applicant is requesting to remove the hours of operation for the majority of land uses allowed in the B2 District that could be constructed on this property. Hours of operation for restaurants, miscellaneous repair and amusement are proposed to be restricted from 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. The Applicant has also updated the format for the prohibited uses (consistent with the prohibited uses from the approved rezoning), revised the fire and rescue monetary proffer and removed a transportation study proffer as this is already completed during the site plan stage of development and is unnecessary for the proffer statement. The Planning Commission held a public hearing for this rezoning on December 5, 2018. The Commission expressed concern over the hours of operation, noise from the businesses and associated deliveries. Ultimately, the Commission postponed this item to allow the Applicant to address the expressed concerns. The Applicant has since revised the proffers to prohibit deliveries between 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. The proposed proffers are as follows (Dated April 8, 1998, Revised January 3, 2019): A. Prohibited Land Uses The Owners proffer to prohibit the following land uses that are permitted within the B-2, Business General District portion of the Property from being developed: Rezoning #04-18 Tasker Road & Warrior Drive Commercial Properties January 7, 2019 Page 2 Land Use SIC Code Automotive Dealers and Gasoline Service Stations 55 (pumps at convenience stores allowed) Hotels and Motels 701 Organization Hotels and Lodging 704 Funeral Service and Crematories 726 Car Washes 7542 Golf Driving Ranges/Miniature Golf Courses 7999 Membership Organizations 86 Commercial Batting Cages Operated Outdoors No SIC Adult Retail Uses No SIC B. Restricted Hours of Operation The Owners proffer to prohibit hours of operation for the following land uses that are permitted within the B-2, Business General District portion of the Property by requiring the businesses to be closed to the public from 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM: Land Use SIC Code Eating and Drinking Places 58 Miscellaneous Repair Services 76 Amusement and Recreational Services Operated Indoors 79 Additionally, the Owners proffer to prohibit deliveries to all land uses that are permitted within the B-2, Business General District portion of the Property from 11:00 PM to 6:00 AM. Staff Note: This revision removes the hours of operation for the majority of the allowed uses on the property. The prohibited hours of operation from the original rezoning were 11 p.m. - 6 a.m. This proposed revision only prohibits the hours of operation for SIC 58, 76 and 79. All other uses can operate 24-hours. Deliveries cannot occur between 11 p.m. - 6 a.m., however; the business would be permitted to operate during those hours. C. Property Development Requirements The Applicant hereby proffers to provide a monetary contribution of $0.10 per developed building square foot for County Fire and Rescue services. The monetary contribution shall be made payable to Frederick County at the time of issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy Permit for any primary structure constructed on the Property. A recommendation regarding this rezoning application to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. Rezoning #04-18 Tasker Road & Warrior Drive Commercial Properties January 7, 2019 Page 3 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/05/18 Public Hearing Held; Postponed Planning Commission: 01/16/19 Pending Board of Supervisors: 02/13/19 Pending PROPOSAL: To rezone 20.24+/- acres from the B2 (General Business) District with proffer to the B2 (General Business) District with revised proffers and 0.62+/- acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance) District with proffers to the RP (Residential Performance) District with revised proffers. LOCATION: The subject properties are located in the northwest and southwest corners of the intersection of Tasker Road and Warrior Drive. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 75-A-104 and 75-A-104E PROPERTY ZONING: B2 (General Business) District and RP (Residential Performance) District PRESENT USE: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: North: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential East: B2 (General Business) Use: Commercial RP (Residential Performance Residential West: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential Rezoning #04-18 Tasker Road & Warrior Drive Commercial Properties January 7, 2019 Page 4 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Planning & Zoning: 1) Site History On April 8, 1998, the Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning #002-98 which rezoned the subject property from the RP (Residential Performance) District to the B2 (General Business) District with proffers. 2) Comprehensive Policy Plan The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County. The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the Community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of Community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. The Area Plans, Appendix I of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan, are the primary implementation tool and will be instrumental to the future planning efforts of the County. Land Use The Southern Frederick Land Use Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan designates this property as a future Neighborhood Village. The existing B2 (General Business) District zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The properties are also within the limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the Urban Development Area (UDA). PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION FROM THE 12/05/18 MEETING: Staff presented an overview of the rezoning request. Mr. Evan Wyatt of Greenway Engineering, representing the Applicant gave a brief overview of the request. He explained, the purpose of this request is the owner recently had a group look at the property for purchase; this group noted the limited hours of operation are a detriment to the property. Mr. Wyatt continued, with that in mind the Applicant wants to maintain the integrity of what was approved; what was done with the prohibited land uses they have maintained everything that was prohibited with the original proffers and added new commercial uses that have been approved over time that were not part of the 1998 zoning code. Mr. Wyatt noted, looking at the adjoining residential uses, the Applicant thought it would still be appropriate to keep the hours of restriction on uses that would be louder in the evening such as restaurants, bars, amusement, and recreational services. Mr. Wyatt concluded, the Fire & Rescue proffer was a one-time payment that was done with the first site plan on the other side of the road and the Applicant felt it was appropriate to make sure there was proffer money coming in for future commercial development on this side for Fire & Rescue. Rezoning #04-18 Tasker Road & Warrior Drive Commercial Properties January 7, 2019 Page 5 A Commission Member reminded everyone that the restriction was put in place because of the noise concerns shared by neighbors. His concern is how the surrounding neighborhoods will be protected from the noise; a grocery store having tractor trailers with night deliveries will create a lot of noise and there is a senior development directly behind this property. A Commission Member asked how this would be explained to the neighbors. Mr. Wyatt commented, the first thing that would be explained is the proffer amendment does nothing to the requirements for the buffer and screening between the commercial property and the senior subdivision which in this case would be a six-foot-high opaque element and landscaping so that would assist with the noise levels. A Commission Member inquired what square footage of buildings can fit on the property. Mr. Wyatt explained, on the 5-acre parcel the maximum would be approximately 25,000 SF and on the 16-acre parcel approximately 100,000 SF. Mr. Wyatt stated, therefore $10,000 to $15,000 could go towards Fire & Rescue. A Commission Member inquired could there be a way to arrange the buildings so the tractor trailer deliveries and parking could be on the side of the buildings rather than in the back. Mr. Wyatt responded, the orientation of the building is to face Warrior Drive; the depth of the property to have the buffer and 120 feet of depth to get to the building may dictate that it is on Tasker Road; he will have to look at the site before he could agree to that condition. A neighboring resident asked where the entrance would be on the 5-acre parcel and will there be more than one entrance. Mr. Wyatt displayed maps and described the possible entrances. A Commission Member commented, the neighborhoods surrounding this property trust the Planning Commission and the decisions made in the past; he cannot support this and break that commitment to the citizens. Another Commission Member suggested to restrict the tractor trailer delivery times from occurring in the middle of the night. A Commission Member noted if that could be accomplished, he may consider this request. A Commission Member noted that restriction would be difficult to enforce. A Commission Member requested a comment from Staff. Staff explained this could not be handled at the site plan process unless a proffered restriction was added; notes on the site plan if there were a proffer in place to restrict the hours, at that time it would become an enforcement issue if violated. Staff commented it would be up to the Applicant to offer this as a proffer. Mr. Wyatt concluded, reasonable comments have been made and Mr. Wyatt would prefer an opportunity to talk to the property owner and would agree to a postponement. The Planning Commission unanimously voted to postpone the rezoning to the January 16, 2019 meeting. (Note: Commissioner Unger was absent from the meeting.) A recommendation regarding this rezoning application to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission. OLD DOMINION GREENSSubdivision WARRIOR CENTERSubdivision MOSBYSTATIONSubdivision MACEDONIA ACRESSubdivision WAKELANDMANORSubdivision 75 A 104E 75 A 104 104SONOMA CT 102LADYSMITH DR 100LADYSMITH DR 103BRIDGEWATER DR 105BRIDGEWATER DR 107BRIDGEWATER DR 145BLACKBURNSFORD 141BLACKBURNSFORD 136BLACKBURNSFORD 130BLACKBURNSFORD 107SONOMA CT106SONOMA CT 101BRIDGEWATER DR 158CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 153BLACKBURNSFORD 149BLACKBURNSFORD 102DEEPBOTTOM PL 132FREDERICKSBURG DR 127FREDERICKSBURG DR 228SPANISH OAK RD 230SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 152CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 155BLACKBURNSFORD 125FREDERICKSBURG DR 222SPANISHOAK RD 231SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 147CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 101DEEPBOTTOM PL 106DEEPBOTTOM PL 126FREDERICKSBURG DR 121FREDERICKSBURG DR 216SPANISH OAK RD 101SHUMARD CT 218SPANISH OAK RD 221SPANISHOAK RD223SPANISHOAK RD 227SPANISHOAK RD 229SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 148CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 146CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 141CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 105DEEPBOTTOM PL 107DEEPBOTTOM PL 110DEEPBOTTOM PL 122FREDERICKSBURG DR 120FREDERICKSBURG DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 112DEEPBOTTOM PL 111SITLINGTONSHILL 213SPANISHOAK RD 215SPANISHOAK RD 142CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 135CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 111DEEPBOTTOM PL 113DEEP BOTTOM PL 109SITLINGTONSHILL 212SPANISHOAK RD 211SPANISHOAK RD 138CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 131CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 114SITLINGTONSHILL 105SITLINGTONSHILL 210SPANISH OAK RD 207SPANISH OAK RD 760WARRIOR DR 136CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 110SITLINGTONSHILL 106SITLINGTONSHILL 305LYNN DR 303LYNN DR 205SPANISH OAK RD 203SPANISH OAK RD 130CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 125CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 123CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 301LYNN DR 229LYNN DR 223LYNN DR 128CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 117CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 300LYNN DR 228LYNN DR 221LYNN DR 217LYNN DR 215LYNN DR 660WARRIOR DR 126CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 124CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 122CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 101SARVIS CT 224LYNN DR 218LYNN DR 220LYNN DR 118CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 135SPANISHOAK RD 115BAYBERRY CT 115BAYBERRY CT 214LYNN DR 100SARVIS CT 131SPANISHOAK RD 206LYNN DR 208LYNN DR 202LYNN DR 127SPANISHOAK RD 107BAYBERRY CT 200LYNN DR 121BAYBERRY CT 100BAYBERRY CT 127LUCYLONG CT 125LUCY LONG CT 123LUCY LONG CT 121LUCYLONG CT119LUCY LONG CT 122SPANISHOAK RD 119SPANISHOAK RD 122BAYBERRY CT 114BAYBERRY CT 110BAYBERRY CT 102BAYBERRY CT 128LUCYLONG CT 118SPANISH OAK RD 114SPANISHOAK RD 115SPANISHOAK RD 120BAYBERRY CT 1340MACEDONIACH RD 126LUCYLONG CT 124LUCYLONG CT 122LUCYLONG CT 120LUCY LONG CT 110SPANISHOAK RD 111SPANISHOAK RD 114QUEENSWAY 1418MACEDONIACH RD 109SPANISHOAK RD 1275TASKER RD 112QUEENS WAY 1400MACEDONIACH RD 110QUEENSWAY 108QUEENSWAY 1403MACEDONIACH RD 1423MACEDONIACH RD 208CROSSKEYS PL 106QUEENSWAY 105QUEENS WAY 104QUEENSWAY 1314MACEDONIACH RD 1320MACEDONIACH RD 106CROSSKEYS PL110CROSS KEYS PL 201CROSSKEYS PL 211CROSSKEYS PL 1270MACEDONIACH RD 1286MACEDONIACH RD 106KEVERNE CT 108KEVERNE CT 110KEVERNE CT100CROSSKEYS PL 1232MACEDONIACH RD 1238MACEDONIACH RD 1244MACEDONIACH RD 1220MACEDONIACH RD 102KEVERNE CT 1218MACEDONIACH RD 1220MACEDONIA CH RD 1226MACEDONIA CH RD 102CHELTENHAM DR 104CHELTENHAM DR 101WINTON LN 100KEVERNE CT 111KEVERNE CT 1200MACEDONIACH RD 96WAKELANDDR 1251MACEDONIACH RD 1255MACEDONIACH RD 1261MACEDONIACH RD 101CHELTENHAM DR 103WINTON LN 103KEVERNE CT 105KEVERNE CT 107KEVERNE CT 109KEVERNE CT 1211MACEDONIACH RD 1223MACEDONIACH RD 108CHELTENHAM DR 101KEVERNE CT 1199MACEDONIACH RD 98WAKELANDDR 105CHELTENHAM DR 101DORNACH CT 408CRAIG DR CR A I G D R WA K E L A N D D R LUCYLONG CT SITLING T O N S H I L L C T C R O S S K E Y S P L CHELT E N H A M D R BRID G E W A T E R D R BLACKB U R N S FORD D R BAYBE R R Y C T KEVERNE C T DEEP B O T T O M P L FREDE R I C K S B U R G D R TASKER RD QUE E N S W A Y SP A N I S H O A K R D LYNN DR MACEDONIA CHURCH RD CEDA R M O U N T A I N D R WARR I O R D R Application Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area B2 (General Business District) RP (Residential Performance District)µ Frederick County Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: October 18, 2018 TASKER RD WARR I O R D R LYNN DR CRA I G D R ALBIN DR AYLOR R D BRIDGEW A T E R D R BLACKBURN S F O R D D R LUCY LONG CTVILLAG E L N SA D I C T SHUM A R D C T MACEDONIA C H U R C H R D BUT T O N B U S H A V E 0 400 800200 Feet REZ #04-18 REZ # 04 - 18: Tasker Rd and Warrior Dr Commercial PropertyPINs: 75 - A - 104, 75 - A - 104ERezoning from B2 and RP with Proffers to B2 and RP with Revised ProffersZoning Map REZ #04-18 OLD DOMINION GREENSSubdivision WARRIOR CENTERSubdivision MOSBYSTATIONSubdivision MACEDONIA ACRESSubdivision WAKELANDMANORSubdivision 75 A 104E 75 A 104 104SONOMA CT 102LADYSMITH DR 100LADYSMITH DR 103BRIDGEWATER DR 105BRIDGEWATER DR 107BRIDGEWATER DR 145BLACKBURNSFORD 141BLACKBURNSFORD 136BLACKBURNSFORD 130BLACKBURNSFORD 107SONOMA CT106SONOMA CT 101BRIDGEWATER DR 158CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 153BLACKBURNSFORD 149BLACKBURNSFORD 102DEEPBOTTOM PL 132FREDERICKSBURG DR 127FREDERICKSBURG DR 228SPANISH OAK RD 230SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 152CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 155BLACKBURNSFORD 125FREDERICKSBURG DR 222SPANISHOAK RD 231SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 147CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 101DEEPBOTTOM PL 106DEEPBOTTOM PL 126FREDERICKSBURG DR 121FREDERICKSBURG DR 216SPANISH OAK RD 101SHUMARD CT 218SPANISH OAK RD 221SPANISHOAK RD223SPANISHOAK RD 227SPANISHOAK RD 229SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 148CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 146CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 141CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 105DEEPBOTTOM PL 107DEEPBOTTOM PL 110DEEPBOTTOM PL 122FREDERICKSBURG DR 120FREDERICKSBURG DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 112DEEPBOTTOM PL 111SITLINGTONSHILL 213SPANISHOAK RD 215SPANISHOAK RD 142CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 135CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 111DEEPBOTTOM PL 113DEEP BOTTOM PL 109SITLINGTONSHILL 212SPANISHOAK RD 211SPANISHOAK RD 138CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 131CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 114SITLINGTONSHILL 105SITLINGTONSHILL 210SPANISH OAK RD 207SPANISH OAK RD 760WARRIOR DR 136CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 110SITLINGTONSHILL 106SITLINGTONSHILL 305LYNN DR 303LYNN DR 205SPANISH OAK RD 203SPANISH OAK RD 130CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 125CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 123CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 301LYNN DR 229LYNN DR 223LYNN DR 128CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 117CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 300LYNN DR 228LYNN DR 221LYNN DR 217LYNN DR 215LYNN DR 660WARRIOR DR 126CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 124CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 122CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 101SARVIS CT 224LYNN DR 218LYNN DR 220LYNN DR 118CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 135SPANISHOAK RD 115BAYBERRY CT 115BAYBERRY CT 214LYNN DR 100SARVIS CT 131SPANISHOAK RD 206LYNN DR 208LYNN DR 202LYNN DR 127SPANISHOAK RD 107BAYBERRY CT 200LYNN DR 121BAYBERRY CT 100BAYBERRY CT 127LUCYLONG CT 125LUCY LONG CT 123LUCY LONG CT 121LUCYLONG CT119LUCY LONG CT 122SPANISHOAK RD 119SPANISHOAK RD 122BAYBERRY CT 114BAYBERRY CT 110BAYBERRY CT 102BAYBERRY CT 128LUCYLONG CT 118SPANISH OAK RD 114SPANISHOAK RD 115SPANISHOAK RD 120BAYBERRY CT 1340MACEDONIACH RD 126LUCYLONG CT 124LUCYLONG CT 122LUCYLONG CT 120LUCY LONG CT 110SPANISHOAK RD 111SPANISHOAK RD 114QUEENSWAY 1418MACEDONIACH RD 109SPANISHOAK RD 1275TASKER RD 112QUEENS WAY 1400MACEDONIACH RD 110QUEENSWAY 108QUEENSWAY 1403MACEDONIACH RD 1423MACEDONIACH RD 208CROSSKEYS PL 106QUEENSWAY 105QUEENS WAY 104QUEENSWAY 1314MACEDONIACH RD 1320MACEDONIACH RD 106CROSSKEYS PL110CROSS KEYS PL 201CROSSKEYS PL 211CROSSKEYS PL 1270MACEDONIACH RD 1286MACEDONIACH RD 106KEVERNE CT 108KEVERNE CT 110KEVERNE CT100CROSSKEYS PL 1232MACEDONIACH RD 1238MACEDONIACH RD 1244MACEDONIACH RD 1220MACEDONIACH RD 102KEVERNE CT 1218MACEDONIACH RD 1220MACEDONIA CH RD 1226MACEDONIA CH RD 102CHELTENHAM DR 104CHELTENHAM DR 101WINTON LN 100KEVERNE CT 111KEVERNE CT 1200MACEDONIACH RD 96WAKELANDDR 1251MACEDONIACH RD 1255MACEDONIACH RD 1261MACEDONIACH RD 101CHELTENHAM DR 103WINTON LN 103KEVERNE CT 105KEVERNE CT 107KEVERNE CT 109KEVERNE CT 1211MACEDONIACH RD 1223MACEDONIACH RD 108CHELTENHAM DR 101KEVERNE CT 1199MACEDONIACH RD 98WAKELANDDR 105CHELTENHAM DR 101DORNACH CT 408CRAIG DR CR A I G D R WA K E L A N D D R LUCYLONG CT SITLING T O N S H I L L C T C R O S S K E Y S P L CHELT E N H A M D R BRID G E W A T E R D R BLACKB U R N S FORD D R BAYBE R R Y C T KEVERNE C T DEEP B O T T O M P L FREDE R I C K S B U R G D R TASKER RD QUE E N S W A Y SP A N I S H O A K R D LYNN DR MACEDONIA CHURCH RD CEDA R M O U N T A I N D R WARR I O R D R Application Parcels Sewer and Water Service Area µ Frederick County Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: October 18, 2018 TASKER RD WARR I O R D R LYNN DR CRA I G D R ALBIN DR AYLOR R D BRIDGEW A T E R D R BLACKBURN S F O R D D R LUCY LONG CTVILLAG E L N SA D I C T SHUM A R D C T MACEDONIA C H U R C H R D BUT T O N B U S H A V E 0 400 800200 Feet REZ #04-18 REZ # 04 - 18: Tasker Rd and Warrior Dr Commercial PropertyPINs: 75 - A - 104, 75 - A - 104ERezoning from B2 and RP with Proffers to B2 and RP with Revised ProffersLocation Map REZ #04-18 WARRIORCENTERSubdivision MACEDONIA ACRESSubdivision WAKELANDMANORSubdivision 75 A 104E 75 A 104 525LINE DR354MONTGOMERYCIR 363MONTGOMERYCIR 105HUME CT 103HUME CT 113LADYSMITH DR 119LADYSMITH DR 105REEDVILLE CT 108UPPERVILLE DR 107UPPERVILLE DR109UPPERVILLE DR 224BRIDGEWATER DR 222BRIDGEWATER DR 228BRIDGEWATER DR 230BRIDGEWATER DR 359MONTGOMERYCIR 104HUME CT 102HUME CT 100HUME CT 106REEDVILLE CT 104UPPERVILLE DR 105UPPERVILLE DR 216BRIDGEWATER DR 229BRIDGEWATER DR231BRIDGEWATER DR 353MONTGOMERY CIR 118CHARDONNAY DR120CHARDONNAY DR 126CHARDONNAY DR 128CHARDONNAY DR 108LADYSMITH DR 105LADYSMITH DR 109REEDVILLE CT 108BRIDGEWATER DR 112BRIDGEWATER DR 221BRIDGEWATER DR225BRIDGEWATER DR 114CHARDONNAY DR116CHARDONNAY DR 129CHARDONNAY DR 104LADYSMITH DR 101LADYSMITH DR 217BRIDGEWATER DR 137BLACKBURNSFORD 135BLACKBURNSFORD 133BLACKBURNSFORD 100CABERNET CT 101SONOMA CT 100SONOMA CT 104SONOMA CT 100LADYSMITH DR 107BRIDGEWATER DR 111BRIDGEWATER DR 143BLACKBURNSFORD 139BLACKBURNSFORD 111CHARDONNAY DR 102CABERNET CT 105SONOMA CT103SONOMA CT 103BRIDGEWATER DR 158CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 153BLACKBURNSFORD 149BLACKBURNSFORD 132BLACKBURNSFORD 105CABERNET CT103CABERNET CT 106CABERNET CT 107SONOMA CT 228SPANISH OAK RD230SPANISH OAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 152CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 155BLACKBURNSFORD 102DEEPBOTTOM PL 123FREDERICKSBURG DR 430ALBIN DR 432ALBIN DR 107CABERNET CT 222SPANISHOAK RD 229SPANISH OAK RD 231SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 148CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 147CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 101DEEPBOTTOM PL 105DEEP BOTTOM PL 106DEEPBOTTOM PL 124FREDERICKSBURG DR 433ALBIN DR 216SPANISH OAK RD 101SHUMARD CT 217SPANISHOAK RD 223SPANISHOAK RD 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 640WARRIOR DR 107DEEP BOTTOM PL 110DEEPBOTTOM PL 120FREDERICKSBURG DR 431ALBIN DR 119SHUMARD CT115SHUMARD CT 109SHUMARD CT 104SHUMARD CT 144CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 142CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 111DEEPBOTTOM PL 112DEEP BOTTOM PL 111SITLINGTONSHILL 125SHUMARD CT 112SHUMARD CT 106SHUMARD CT 212SPANISHOAK RD 211SPANISHOAK RD 138CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 131CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 114SITLINGTONSHILL 129SHUMARD CT 124SHUMARD CT120SHUMARD CT 313LYNN DR 309LYNN DR 307LYNN DR 207SPANISH OAK RD 760WARRIOR DR 112SITLINGTONSHILL 108SITLINGTONSHILL 128SHUMARD CT 314LYNN DR 204SPANISHOAK RD 301LYNN DR 203SPANISHOAK RD 130CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 123CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 120SARVIS CT 119SARVIS CT 115SARVIS CT 308LYNN DR 304LYNN DR 229LYNN DR 223LYNN DR 217LYNN DR 660WARRIOR DR 128CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 118SARVIS CT 111SARVIS CT113SARVIS CT 101SARVIS CT 228LYNN DR 224LYNN DR 215LYNN DR 122CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 120CEDARMOUNTAIN DR 112SUFFOLK CIR 114SARVIS CT 110SARVIS CT 135SPANISHOAK RD 115BAYBERRY CT 115BAYBERRY CT 218LYNN DR 214LYNN DR 114SUFFOLKCIR 101SADI CT 103SADI CT 102SARVIS CT 131SPANISH OAK RD 208LYNN DR 202LYNN DR 126SLIPPERYELM DR 107SADI CT 104SADI CT102SADI CT 128SPANISHOAK RD 127SPANISHOAK RD 109BAYBERRY CT107BAYBERRY CT 200LYNN DR 124ELM DR 113SADI CT 116SADI CT 124SPANISH OAK RD 119SPANISH OAK RD 121BAYBERRY CT 110BAYBERRY CT 100BAYBERRY CT 128LUCY LONG CT 127LUCYLONG CT 125LUCY LONG CT 123LUCY LONG CT 127SLIPPERYELM DR 117SADI CT 119SADI CT 118SADI CT 114SPANISHOAK RD 115SPANISHOAK RD 114BAYBERRY CT 126LUCYLONG CT 122LUCYLONG CT 123BUTTONBUSH AVE 123SADI CT 110SPANISHOAK RD 125SADI CT 111SPANISH OAK RD 114QUEENS WAY 1340MACEDONIACH RD122BUTTONBUSH AVE 121BUTTON BUSHAVE 109SPANISHOAK RD 1275TASKER RD 112QUEENS WAY 110QUEENS WAY 1400MACEDONIACH RD 113COTTONWOODAVE 118BUTTONBUSH AVE 117BUTTONBUSH AVE 108QUEENS WAY 105QUEENS WAY 1403MACEDONIACH RD116BUTTONBUSH AVE 111BUTTONBUSH AVE 208CROSSKEYS PL 104QUEENS WAY 106QUEENSWAY 1320MACEDONIA CH RD 107COTTONWOODAVE 112BUTTONBUSH AVE 110BUTTONBUSH AVE 109BUTTONBUSH AVE 110CROSSKEYS PL 207CROSS KEYS PL211CROSSKEYS PL 1270MACEDONIA CH RD 102QUEENSWAY 1314MACEDONIACH RD 108KEVERNE CT 110KEVERNE CT 105BUTTON BUSHAVE 1232MACEDONIACH RD 1244MACEDONIACH RD 102KEVERNE CT 106KEVERNE CT 100COTTONWOODAVE 103BUTTON BUSHAVE 1220MACEDONIACH RD 1218MACEDONIACH RD 101CHELTENHAM DR 102CHELTENHAM DR 104CHELTENHAM DR 109KEVERNE CT 111KEVERNE CT 109MOUNTAINASH CT 1223MACEDONIA CH RD 1251MACEDONIACH RD 103CHELTENHAM DR 103WINTON LN 103KEVERNE CT 105KEVERNE CT107KEVERNE CT 103MOUNTAINASH CT 1199MACEDONIACH RD 304LAUREL HILL DR 302LAURELHILL DR 306LAURELHILL DR 107CHELTENHAM DR 108CHELTENHAM DR 408CRAIG DR 1151TASKER RD 1175MACEDONIACH RD 212LAURELHILL DR 214LAURELHILL DR 103DORNACH CT 402CRAIG DR 406CRAIG DR 411CRAIG DR R E E D V I L L E C T HUME CT CRA I G D R CR O S S KE Y S P L CHELT E N H A M D R SONO M A C T MOU N T A I N A S H C T COT T O N W O O D AVE SARVIS CT WA K E L A N D D R MONT G O M E R Y C I R CAB E R N E T C T U P P E R V I L L E D R FRED E R I C K S B U R G D R BLACKB U R N S F O R D D R CHARDONNAY DR BAYBE R R Y C T KEVERNE C T DEEP B O T T O M P L LADY S M I T H D R SAD I C T QUE E N S WAY SHUM A R D C T SPANIS H OAK RD BUT T O N B U S H A V E LYNN DR MACEDONIA CHURCH RD CEDA R M O U N T A I N D R BRIDGE W A T E R D R T A S K E R R D WAR R I O R D R Application Parcels Sewer and Water Service AreaLong Range Land Use Residential Neighborhood Village Urban Center Mobile Home Community Business Highway Commercial Mixed-Use Mixed Use Commercial/Office Mixed Use Industrial/Office Industrial Warehouse Heavy Industrial Extractive Mining Commercial Rec Rural Community Center Fire & Rescue Sensitive Natural Areas Institutional Planned Unit Development Park Recreation School Employment Airport Support Area B2 / B3 Residential, 4 u/a High-Density Residential, 6 u/a High-Density Residential, 12-16 u/a Rural Area Interstate Buffer Landfill Support Area Natural Resources & Recreation Environmental & Recreational Resources µ Frederick County Planning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: October 18, 2018 TASKER RD WARR I O R D R LYNN DR CRA I G D R ALBIN DR AYLOR R D BRIDGEW A T E R D R BLACKBURN S F O R D D R LUCY LONG CTVILLAG E L N SA D I C T SHUM A R D C T MACEDONIA C H U R C H R D BUT T O N B U S H A V E 0 490 980245 Feet REZ #04-18 REZ # 04 - 18: Tasker Rd and Warrior Dr Commercial PropertyPINs: 75 - A - 104, 75 - A - 104ERezoning from B2 and RP with Proffers to B2 and RP with Revised ProffersLong Range Land Use Map REZ #04-18 D COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director DATE: January 7, 2019 RE: Discussion: 2019-2024 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is a document that consists of a schedule of major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five-year period, as well as, a category for long term projects (6 + years out). The CIP is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the Comprehensive Plan. The inclusion of projects on the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities and cost estimates may change throughout the year based on changi ng circumstances. It is also possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is projected. The CIP is also updated annually, and projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. CIP Components The CIP provides project recommendations from various County Agencies and tables that outline the projects and cost estimates for the projects. Within the tables, columns for each year show the funding needs that would be requested in the corresponding budget cycle. In addition, those projects that are long range projects have been placed at the end of the CIP table, outside of the five-year window. The CIP includes three separate tables; the first table shows County funded projects and the second and third tables cover Transportation projects and Airport projects which are primarily funded through other sources. 2019-2024 CIP January 7, 2019 Page 2 The CIP includes a total of 79 projects, including several new projects. Projects within the CIP are for: Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional Library, County Administration, Fire and Rescue, Transportation and Winchester Regional Airport. Background – Discussions On December 10, 2018, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) discussed the 2019-2024 CIP capital improvement project requests. The role of the CPPC in the CIP process was to ensure that the various departmental project requests are in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Following the CPPC discussion, the Committee endorsed the CIP and endorsed its conformance with the County’s Comprehensive Plan. The CPPC forwarded the CIP to the Planning Commission for discussion. Conclusion Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the Board of Supervisors regarding the 2019-2024 CIP. It is also the role of the Planning Commission to affirm that the 2019-2024 CIP is in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Please find attached the Draft 2019-2024 CIP with applicable text, tables and maps. More detailed information regarding the individual department requests is available digitally and may be forwarded to you directly if requested. The information provided by the individual departments is also located on the County’s website via the following link: www.fcva.us/plans. If adopted, the CIP and included maps will become a component of the Comprehensive Plan, which would satisfy the review requirement of Section 15.2-2232 of the Code of Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a “feature shown” within a jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan. Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this information. CEP/pd Attachment Adopted by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors TBD Recommended by the Frederick County Planning Commission TBD FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 2019-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION……………………………...……………………………….. 1 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS……………..………..………………….2 Frederick County Public Schools…………………….……... 2 Frederick County Parks and Recreation ..………………. 2 Handley Regional Library .………………….………….……….2 County Administration .……………………………..…………..2 Fire & Rescue………...……………………………….………………3 Volunteer Fire Company Requests ………………..……….3 Transportation Committee……………………………………. 4 Winchester Regional Airport………………………….……….4 2019-2024 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAPS 2018-2023 Capital Projects………………………………………5 2018-2023 Frederick County Public Schools….…….…..6 2018-2023 Parks and Recreation ………………..…..………7 2018-2023 Transportation Projects………………..………..8 CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS………………………….…….………….………9 PROJECT FUNDING……………………………………………….………………9 2019-2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLES….10-13 APPENDIX - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS Frederick County Public Schools…………………………... 15 Frederick County Parks and Recreation ……………….…18 Handley Regional Library……………………………………….. 27 County Administration…………………….………………………29 Fire and Rescue……………..……………………………….……….32 Volunteer Fire Company Requests ………………………….34 Transportation Committee………………………….…………..38 Winchester Regional Airport……………….………..………. 44 1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY FY 2019-2024 INTRODUCTION Section §15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five years. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Once the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and provides a link between the documents and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning projects. The inclusion of projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that particu lar projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is projected. 2 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS Frederick County Public Schools Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects that have been priorities from previous years. The top capital improvement priority for the Schools is the construction of the New High School. The Armel Elementary School addition and renovation is the second highest priority, followed by administrative office renovation. Other schools included for renovation and addition projects include James Wood High School, Sherando High School and Apple Pie Ridge Elementary. Parks & Recreation The top capital improvement priority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams Creek Greenway Trail. This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents of this corridor along with the surrounding communities and was emphasized in the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan completed during 2012. Other top priorities include the construction of a community center, a gym addition at the Snowden Bridge Elementary School and the Indoor Aquatic Center. Handley Regional Library The Handley Regional Library recommends three projects. The library’s top priority is a new library branch in the Gainesboro area. The two remaining projects request that funding be provided for new library branches throughout the County which include the areas of Route 522 South and Senseny/Greenwood Road; both of which are anticipated to be located within the UDA (Urban Development Area) in locations consistent with the approved area plans - the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the Southern Frederick Area Plan. County Administration The two requests from Public Works are for the relocation of the Albin Citizen Convenience Site and the expansion of the Gore Citizen Convenience Site. The joint County Administration and School Administration Building and the future replacement of the Joint Judicial Center remain in the CIP. 3 General Government Capital Expenditures is also included in the CIP – this item enhances the connection between the CIP and proffered contributions made to mitigate the impacts of development projects. This item addresses those general government capital expenditures that may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold. This is similar to the approach tak en for Fire and Rescue Capital Equipment (see Fire and Rescue descriptions). Fire and Rescue The top project for the Fire and Rescue is the construction of the Regional Public Safety Training Center. The construction of Fire & Rescue Station #22 in the vicinity of Route 277, with the ability to provide an annex facility for other County-related offices. Fire and Rescue has also included a project which provides for the capital apparatus needs of this facility. Project four includes the construction of Station #23, a new facility located in the vicinity of Crosspointe that would also provide the ability for an annex facility for other County-related offices. Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests The revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,00 0 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was established remains a component of the CIP. This capital expenditure fund is for purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment that may fall below the guidelines established by the Finance Committee. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Individual Fire and Rescue Companies previously identified their own capital requests which have been added to the CIP in a lump sum amount. Each of the capital requests meet the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee. Greenwood Fire Station has included a request for a renovation of the station; Clearbrook Fire station is requesting a new fire station; Middletown Station is seeking a building addition; Stephens City Station is seeking a medic unit replacement and a tower replacement. 4 Transportation Committee The Transportation Committee continues to provide project requests for the CIP. Virginia State Code allows for transportatio n projects to be included within a locality's CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from developers and revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does not take away funding for generalized road improvements. The Transportation Committee has requested funding for 22 projects. The top three requests include Route 277 improvements, Airport Road/East Tevis Street Extension and Renaissance Drive (Phase 2). The inclusion of the Eastern Road Plan Improvements item once again emphasizes the connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects which are aimed at mitigating potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Winchester Regional Airport Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and state governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding. The construction of a new general aviation terminal to support future airport operations continues to be number one in the CIP, followed by the Taxiway “A” Relocation (design/construction). A number of other projects focus on land acquisition in support of ai rport development to meet Federal Aviation requirements for general aviation facilities. The vast majority of the funding for these improvements comes from the FAA and VDA. ! ! ! ! £¤11 £¤522 £¤50 £¤522 £¤522 £¤11 £¤522 £¤11 £¤50 £¤50 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 ¬«7 ¬«127 ¬«277 ¬«55 ¬«259 ¬«37 32 4 1 2, 3 3 2 1 1 1 0 10,000 20,0005,000 Feet02.5 51.25 Miles V 2019 - 2024Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Plan2019 - 2024Capital ImprovementsSpecific or Approximate Locations Airport 1 Albin Convenience Site Expansion2 Gore Convenience Site Expansion County Administration 1 Library Branch - Gainesboro2 Library Branch - Rt 522 South3 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood Library 1 Regional Training Center2 Fire & Rescue Station 223 Fire & Rescue Station 22 Apparatus4 Fire & Rescue Station 23 Fire & R escue 1 Greenwood Station Renovation2 New Clearbrook Fire Station3 Middletown Station Building Addition4 Stephens City Station Medic Unit Replacement and Tower Replacement Fire & R escue - Volunteer Stations ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Middle School The Willows Fourth High School Elementary School Elementary School Elementary School Multi-Use Campus Villages at Artrip Middle School SHS MHS JWHS FCMS JWMS REAMS ABMS GES SES RRES APRES EES AES BHES MES OVES IHES GMES SBES Facilities Services Support Facilities West School Board Office NREP/SRSDJHC Transportation Facility £¤11 £¤522 £¤522 £¤50 £¤522 £¤11 £¤522 £¤50 £¤11 £¤50 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 ¬«7 ¬«127 ¬«277 ¬«55 ¬«259 ¬«37 Win chester Midd letown StephensCity !High Schools !Middle Schools !Elementary Schools !Support FacilitiesPotential School Facility Locations Potential School LocationsPurchased LandProffered LandPotential ProfferUrban D evelopment AreaSWSA V 0 2 41 MilesNote:Created by Frederick County Departm ent ofPlanning & Developm ent Map represents the Capital Im provem ent Requests submitted by Frederick County School Board11/26/18 School LocationsAre MostAppropriateWithin the UDA 2019 - 2024Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Plan Existing and Potential School Locations [k [k ClearbrookPark SherandoPark Rose HillPark Snowden BridgePark Frederick HeightsPark £¤11 £¤522 £¤522 £¤50 £¤522 £¤11 £¤522 £¤11 £¤50 £¤50 §¨¦66 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 ¬«7 ¬«127 ¬«277 ¬«55 ¬«259 ¬«37 ReynoldsStore CrossJunction Gainesboro Gore Clear Brook StephensonAlbin Round HillShawneeland Star Tannery Armel V 0 1.5 30.75 Miles Note:Created by Frederick County Departm ent ofPlanning & Developm ent Map represents the Capital Im provem ent Requests submitted by The Dept of Parks & Recreation11/26/2018 Proposed Parks DistrictCommunityNeighborhoodAbrams C reek TrailExisting County Parks District ParkCommunity Park [k Neighborhood ParkPublically Accessible Land FederalStateBattlefieldNon-ProfitLocal ParkTuscarora TrailSchool !y Public Boat LaunchUrban Development Area 2019 - 2024Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements PlanNew Parks/Rec Locations National Forest EAST NE WEST Winchester Stephens City Middletown £¤11 £¤522 £¤11 £¤522 £¤50 £¤50 £¤11 £¤522 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 ¬«277 ¬«7 ¬«37 Winchester StephensCity 0 1 20.5 Miles Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, VA 22601www.fcva.us11/20/18 V 2019 - 2024Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovement PlanTransportation Projects 7 7 7 7 1 9 12 18 3 2 4 131716 1010 15 15 15 11 2019 - 2024Capital Improvement PlanTransportation Projects Funded Priorities 1. ROUTE 277 WIDENING & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 1) 3. RENAISSAN CE DR, PHASE 2 2. AIRPORT RD EXTENSION,EAST TEVIS ST EXTENSION, &BRIDGE OVER I-81 4. SULPHUR SPRINGS RD IMPROVEMENT FROM ROUTE 50 TO LAND FILL 6. PAPERMILL RD; RT TURNLANE EXTENSION AT ROUTE 522$+6 5. ROUTE 277; RT TURN LANE EXTENSION AT WARRIOR DR$+5 Unfunded Priorities 22. EASTERN ROAD PLANIMPROVEMENTS22 7. CONTIN UE ROUTE 37 PLANNING & ENGINEERING W ORK 8. I-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATIONðñò""307 9. ROUTE 277 WIDENING & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 2) 10. REDBUD R D & EXIT 317 RAMPREALIGNMENTS 11. ROUTE 11 N WIDENING FROMSNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD TOOLD C HARLESTOW N RD 12. WARRIOR DR EXTENSION TO NEW EXIT 307 13. CHANNING DR EXTENSION TO ROUTE 50 14. BR UCETOW N RD/HOPEWELL RD; ALIGNMENTAND INTERSECTION$+14 15. ROUTE 11 N OF WINCHESTER WIDENING TO W V LINE 16. SENSENY R D W IDENING 17. IN VERLEE WAY; CONNECTION FROM SENSENY RD TO ROUTE 50 18. WARRIOR DR EXTENSIONFROM ROUTE 3719. SENSENY R D; TURN LANES AT CR ESTLEIGH DR$+19 $+14 $+19 $+6 $+5 ðñò""307 8 9 THE CIP TABLES - CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan tables, on the following four pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Projects Ranked by Department - The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. County Contribution - The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individua l fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes - Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional fundi ng sources for particular projects. Total Project Costs - The cost for each project, including the County allocations and other funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in Table 1 have a total projected cost to the County of $414,421,169 this figure excludes Airport request and transportation projects as these are primarily funded through other sources. While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five years. • School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public Scho ol Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The Parks and Recreation Commission actively seeks grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the County. • The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, dev eloper contributions, and revenue sharing. • Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, sta te, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. Contribution Per Fiscal Year Projects - Ranked by Department 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024+ Long Range Comprehensive Plan Projects County Contributions Notes Total Project Costs Department Ensuing Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ Public Schools Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located throughout the County. New High School $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $40,000,000 $12,200,000 $122,200,000 $122,200,000 Armel Elementary School Addition/Renovation $2,500,000 $7,500,000 $1,800,000 $11,800,000 $11,800,000 School Board Office Renovation/Expansion $1,600,000 $2,000,000 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 James Wood High School Renovation/Upgrades $1,000,000 $20,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $66,000,000 $66,000,000 Sherando High School Renovation/Addition $1,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $25,400,000 $71,400,000 $71,400,000 Apple Pie Ridge Elementary Renovation $3,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 Total $34,100,000 $49,500,000 $46,800,000 $58,200,000 $51,000,000 $50,400,000 $290,000,000 $290,000,000 Parks & Recreation Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $111,000 $599,985 $508,915 $1,219,900 $1,219,900 Community Center $9,067,000 $9,067,000 $9,067,000 Gym Addition - Snowden Bridge Elementary $1,260,000 $1,260,000 $1,260,000 Indoor Aquatic Facility $480,000 $11,361,000 $11,841,000 $11,841,000 Sherando/Clearbrook Water Slide/Spray Ground $655,000 $655,000 $655,000 Snowden Bridge Park Development $210,000 $2,200,000 $2,410,000 $2,410,000 Sherando SH Baseball Lighting Replacement $856,000 $856,000 $856,000 Sherando SH Park Area 1 Rec Access Phase 2 $100,000 $1,190,000 $1,290,000 $1,290,000 Sherando SH Softball Complex $176,000 $1,547,000 $1,723,000 $1,723,000 Sherando SH Park Area 3 Development $100,000 $2,150,000 $2,250,000 $2,250,000 Sherando Playground Replacement $350,000 $300,000 $150,000 $250,000 $1,050,000 $1,050,000 Community Park $1,040,000 $1,154,000 $2,194,000 $2,194,000 Neighborhood Parks $873,000 $4,363,000 $5,236,000 $5,236,000 District Parks $4,131,000 $8,262,000 $12,393,000 $12,393,000 National Guard Armory Gym Addition $510,000 $510,000 $510,000 Sherando S. Sherando Park Development $2,137,000 $2,137,000 $2,137,000 Fleet Trip Vehicles $322,000 $322,000 $322,000 Sherando SH Park Area 1 and 2 Development $3,127,000 $3,127,000 $3,127,000 Indoor Ice Rink $6,489,000 $6,489,000 $6,489,000 Total $386,000 $16,726,000 $17,513,985 $6,453,915 $5,836,000 $19,114,000 $0 $66,029,900 $66,029,900 Table 1 - 2019-2024 Capital Improvement Plan Requests Contribution Per Fiscal Year Projects - Ranked by Department 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024+ Long Range Comprehensive Plan Projects County Contributions Notes Total Project Costs Regional Library Gainesboro Library $165,023 $1,475,736 $128,275 $1,769,034 $1,769,034 Route 522 South Library $306,765 $2,736,470 $3,043,235 $3,043,235 Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD TBD Total $0 $165,023 $1,475,736 $128,275 $306,765 $2,736,470 $4,812,269 $4,812,269 County Administration Albin Convenience Site $1,224,000 $1,224,000 E $1,224,000 Gore Convenience Site Expansion $35,000 $909,000 $944,000 $944,000 General Government Capital Expenditures $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 County/School Board Administration Building TBD TBD E TBD Joint Judicial Center New Facility TBD TBD TBD Total $1,424,000 $235,000 $1,109,000 $200,000 $200,000 $0 $3,168,000 $3,168,000 Fire & Rescue Regional Training Center $75,000 $100,000 $1,250,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 $31,175,000 $31,175,000 Fire Station 22 $400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000 Station 22 Apparatus $250,000 $850,000 $1,100,000 $1,100,000 Fire Station 23 $550,000 $2,150,000 $1,000,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000 Total $1,025,000 $4,000,000 $4,600,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $0 $10,250,000 39,375,000 $39,375,000 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Requests Greenwood Fire Station renovation 700,000 $700,000 including capital equipment requests New Clearbrook Fire Station 33,000 88,000 4,575,000 $4,696,000 Middletown Station Building Addition 100,000 3,000,000 $3,100,000 Stephens City Station - Medic Unit Replacement 240,000 $240,000 Stephens City Station - Tower 11 Replacement 130,000 1,170,000 $1,300,000 Total $38,208,000 $73,914,023 $76,403,721 $76,352,190 $66,842,765 $72,250,470 $404,385,169 $414,421,169 Other Funding Sources:E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources TBD= To be Determined Contribution Per Fiscal Year Projects - Ranked by Agency 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024+ Long Range Comprehensive Plan Projects County/VDOT/P rivate Contributions Notes Total Project Costs Ensuing Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ Funded Priorities Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 1)$35,944,878 $35,944,878 E $35,944,878 Airport Road Extension, East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over 81 $24,703,788 $24,703,788 E $24,703,788 Rennaisance Drive, Phase 2 $5,791,500 $5,791,500 E $5,791,500 Sulpher Springs Road Improvement project $11,946,091 $11,946,091 E $11,946,091 Route 277 right turn extension Warrior Drive $476,644 $476,644 E $476,644 Papermill Road right turn lane extension Route 522 $507,262 $507,262 E $507,262 Unfunded Priorities Route 37 Engineering & Construction $750,000,000 $750,000,000 E $750,000,000 I-81 Exit 307 Relocation with 4 ln connection to Double Church and Stephens City Bypass $234,255,469 $234,255,469 E $234,255,469 Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening and Safety Improvements (ph 2)$25,428,550 $25,428,550 E $25,428,550 Redbud Road Realignment and Exit 317 Ramp realignment $11,239,132 $11,239,132 E $11,239,132 Widening of Route 11 North (ph 1)$28,346,120 $28,346,120 E $28,346,120 Warrior Drive Extension (south)$47,000,000 $47,000,000 E $47,000,000 Channing Drive Extension $45,000,000 $45,000,000 E $45,000,000 Brucetown/Hopewell Realign.$3,800,000 $3,800,000 E $3,800,000 Widening of Route 11 North (ph2)$192,000,000 $192,000,000 E $192,000,000 Senseny Road Widening $67,000,000 $67,000,000 E $67,000,000 Inverlee Way $27,300,000 $27,300,000 E $27,300,000 Warrior Drive Extension (Crosspointe south)$33,500,000 $33,500,000 E $33,500,000 Senseny Road turn lanes/improvements Crestleigh Drive $2,548,579 $2,548,579 E $2,548,579 Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD E TBD Total $79,370,163 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,467,417,850 $1,546,788,013 $1,546,788,013 Other Funding Sources: E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources Table 2 - Transportation Projects - CIP Requests The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing Contribution Per Fiscal Year Projects - Ranked by Agency 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022-2023 2023-2024 2024+ Long Range Comprehensive Plan Projects County Contributions Notes Total Project Costs Ensuing Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+ New General Aviation Terminal $1,960,000 $4,070,000 $85,400 A,B $6,115,400 Taxiway "A" Relocation Design/Construction $300,000 $3,130,000 $3,340,000 6,300,000 $3,800,000 A,B $16,870,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-51 (Moreland)$175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-69 (Robertson)$160,000 A,B $160,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-33A (Beaver)$125,000 $125,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-40 (Rosenberger)$175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper)$200,000 A,B $200,000 Land Parcel 64-A-64 (Hott)$160,000 A,B $160,000 Runway 14 Approach Lights $500,000 A,B $500,000 Fuel Storage Facility $1,000,000 A,B $1,000,000 North Side Access Road 700,000 A,B $700,000 Land Parcel 64B-A-52 (Lee)175,000 A,B $175,000 Land Parcel 64-A-59 (Kyle)175,000 A,B $175,000 RPZ Land Services 250,000 A,B $250,000 Total $2,595,000 $7,860,000 $3,425,400 $7,800,000 $3,800,000 $700,000 $26,780,400 A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation B= Partial funding from FAA Table 3 - Winchester Reginal Airport CIP Requests *Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. 14 APPENDIX PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS 15 Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - New High School Description: The new high school project will serve students grades 9-12, have a program capacity of 1,725 students, and will address anticipated growth in high school student enrollment in th e school division. The site is located at the end of Justes Drive behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school is designed for collaborative education, similar to the new Frederick County MS, with a variety of learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learn ing styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working world. Capital Cost: $122,200,000 Justification: This project will address expected growth in high school student enrollment in the school division over the next several years. We propose to open the new high school in the fall of 2023. We project that enrollment in the high schools by that time will be 4,597 students. High school program capacity is currently 3,785 students. Construction Schedule: Construction will take 48 months PRIORITY 2 - Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation Description: Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since that time. The school contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 558 students. As of October 31, 2018, the school has 639 students. Eight classrooms will be added to Armel ES, to accommodate the additional growth at Lake Frederick. The existing facility will be updated as needed and core areas partially renovated to serve the additional students. Capital Cost: $11,800,000 Justification: Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, growth in the attendance zone will need to be addressed through the addition of classrooms to the facility. An attendance rezoning was completed four years ago as part of the implementation of full-day kindergarten. Addressing the growth issue at Armel was studied as a part of this rezoning. Four areas were identified to be rezoned to another school to offset the additional growth at Lake Frederick. None of the four options provided a complete and satisfactory solution. One option would have put Armel outside of its own attendance zone. A second would have spli t a neighborhood and sent some of the neigh borhood to a school further away. A third would have simply relocated the growth issue to another school. The fourth option was adopted, but only moved ~50 students, a temporary reprieve from growth pressures. 16 Construction Schedule: 30 months PRIORITY 3 – Administrative Office Renovation Description: Frederick County Public Schools’ administration has been located at the old Kline Elementary School building since 1983. Before the building was converted to offices, it had served as a school since 1961. The facility contains 27,992 square feet, including the 5,000 square foot Annex and the 2,400 square foot Finance Addition, but not including the four modular classroom units that are used for offices and work space. Capital Cost: $3,600,000 Justification: The 57-year-old Administrative Offices building does not have enough office and meeting space, needs technology upgrades, and improvements to the plumbing and electrical systems to meet modern code. Meeting space is at a premium, as we only have 2 sizeable meeting rooms. There are also building security and asbestos issues. These issues will become pressing as the district (and therefore the staff) grows. Construction Schedule: 30 months PRIORITY 4 - James Wood High School Renovations and Additions Description: James Wood High School opened in 1980 and has served as a high school since that time. The school contains 234,095 square feet and has a program capacity of 1,200 students. The building serves grades 9-12. The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Focus of the renovation will include student- centered learning modification of instructional areas to support modern instructional delivery, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, technology, finishes, and site. Capital Cost: $66,000,000 Justification: James Wood High School is 38 years old. Renovations and additions are needed to a number of areas to support effective, economical, and efficient operation of the school for years to come. This school will be renovated to be more like the 4th HS, the new Frederick County MS, and the Aylor MS replacement, with a variety of learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working world. Construction Schedule: 36 Months 17 PRIORITY 5 – Sherando High School Renovations and Addition Description: Sherando High School opened in 1993. The facility contains 239,517 square feet and has a program capacity of 1,285 students serving grades 9-12. Several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation, including reorganization and addition of classroom and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborative education. Because we want the facility to last another 30 years, facility infrastructure will be renewed and updated, and finishes will be refreshed. Other areas to be addressed are security, traffic safety, and gender equity in athletic facilities. Capital Cost: $71,400,000 Justification: Sherando is 25 years old and will be at least 32 years old by the time we renovate it. Renovations are needed to ensure the economical, efficient, and effective operation of the school for years to come. Modern instruction requires that a variety of learning spaces be provided, including collaborative spaces of varying sizes and p roject labs (similar to make spaces). Transportation safety concerns exist on and around the school site at Sherando during arrival and dismissal. Sherando does no t have a softball field on site, instead using a softball field in Sherando Park. This repre sents an equity issue between boys and girls’ sports and is contrary to FCPS’ policy of equity between boys and girls’ sports. Construction Schedule: 48 Months PRIORITY 6 – Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation Description: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School opened in 1974 and has served continuously as an elementary school since that time. The schools contains 65,120 square feet and has a program capacity of 459 students. Currently the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed, including open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarms, electrical, plu mbing and mechanical systems. Capital Cost: $15,000,000 Justification: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is 44 years old and renovation is needed to a number of areas to ensure the economical and efficient operations of the school for years to come. Construction Schedule: 48 Months 18 Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 – Abrams Creek Trail Description: 10' wide, asphalt, shared-use trail along Abrams Creek. From Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is estimated the trail will have six bridge stream crossings and will be approximately 3 miles in length. As outlined below, the project is envisioned in three phases of approximately 1 mile each. Each phase will have logical beginning and ending points and be usable trail section s in themselves. Phase 1 from Senseny Road to Woodstock Lane. Phase 2 from Woodstock Lane to Woody's Place, and Phase 3 from Woody's Place to Channing Drive. Capital Cost: $1,219,900 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents and provide an alternate means of entering and exiting the City of Winchester from Eastern Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey, and the 2012 Virginia Outdoors Plan Survey. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23. PRIORITY 2 – Community Center Description: The Community Center project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a minimum of two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by indoor soc cer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton with the installation of in-floor sleeves and drop curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden and home, outdoo r, craft, antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities to take place at one time. The facility would also house a fitness center, multi-purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Capital Cost: $9,067,000 Justification: Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied significantly on the use of the County public schools to house recreation programs. This arrangement was adequate when the department first started out, however th e department currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating a situation where the department is limited in its ability to meet the programming and facility needs of the County residents. A Community Center facility will facilitate the department to meet citizen programming demands and provide the are a with a facility to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents and is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frede rick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. 19 The Department and the community has benefited from the co -location of recreation and school facilities, however community size warrants a separate facility dedicated to recreation use. The construction of this project will provide a facility the Department will be able to offer year-round and all-day recreational programming to the residents of Frederick County. This facility could be built in conjunction with or as an attachment to the Indoor Aquatic F acility and should be centrally located. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22. PRIORITY 3 – Gym Addition – Snowden Bridge Elementary Description: This project brings the Snowden Bridge Elementary School into the Cooperative Use framework for shared school and community uses. Expanding the gymnasium from elementary size to full size and adding community multi-purpose room space to the proposed school site. Capital Cost: $1,260,000 Justification: The model in place since Orchard View Elementary was built in 2000 added gymnasium and multipurpose space to elementary schools, as these schools are located where population growth is present. Growth in community programming, camps, and indoor sport leagues continues to create demand for more gymnasium and multi-purpose space. Adding pressure for this location is that there are no community center spaces in the Stonewall District, while population continues to increase. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 4 – Indoor Aquatic Facility Description: The approximately 35,000 square foot building will likely house a 10-lane competitive pool, 6 lane warm water teaching pool, meeting rooms, shower and changing rooms, and facilities support areas. The above facility would meet the swimming needs of the community, including HS level swim teams. Capital Cost: $11,841,000 Justification: There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By constructing the indoor poo l, it would permit the department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citizen programming provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. 20 This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer competitive scholastic programs and year-round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 5 - Water Slide and Spray Ground Description: Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of the diving boards and the installation of one 50' water slide and on e 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also include the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool. Capital Cost: $655,000 Justification: To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park service area. Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department operates two outdoor swimming pools at the regional parks. These facilities are over 20 years old and were constructed with two diving boards as the main feature for each pool. Swimming pool attend ance has trended decline in recent years and users are requesting different water features. The addition of two water slides and a spray ground to each pool facility will appeal to families and younger children, increasing pool attendance by an estimated 30%. With the increase in attendance and potentially fees to comparable facilities, the County would realize an increase in user fee revenue. Clearbrook and Sherando Parks, currently owned by Frederick County, offer the best site and location for the dev elopment of this facility. With the upgrade to the existing swimming pool facilities, the County would not have to incur costs for property acquisition or infrastructure development and increase the recreational opportunities at the regional parks. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 6 – Snowden Bridge Park Development Description: Snowden Bridge Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge development utilizes park and school land for the provision of an active recreation park. The above park is to include athletic fields suitable for league play. Lighting, restroom and parking are part of the park concept. Capital Cost: $2,410,000 Justification: The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (formerly Stephenson Village) rezoning proffer of 2003. The proffer indicates the provided land to be used for baseball and/or soccer field development in anticipation of the population increase generated by the development. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. 21 PRIORITY 7 – Sherando Ballfield Lighting Replacement Description: Upgrade the ballfield lighting at Sherando Parks Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the removal of the 30/20 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and replace with 50/30 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps and steel poles on (4) four fields at Sherando Park. This standard is required by Little League International on all little league fields. LED light fixtures are specified as HID fixtures are facing obsolescence. Capital Cost: $856,000 Justification: The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfield light system be upg raded to achieve the recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the playing surface. This will facilitate the provi sion of recreational opportunities at Sherando Park for the service areas which include all Frederick County residents. The field light fixtures are over twenty-five years old and are affixed to poles. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 8 - Sherando Park Area 1 Recreation Access Phase 2 Description: This project continues the development vision for the NW area of Sherando Park located north of Rt. 277 as shown in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Continuing Line Drive to Landgrant Lane, parking, restroom building, and dog park are elements of this phase. Capital Cost: $1,290,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22. PRIORITY 9 - Sherando Park North – Softball Complex Description: This project completes the development vision for the SE area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are softball fields to complete the complex, a shared use trail segment, roadway and parking. Capital Cost: $1,723,000 22 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields within the County’s regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth and adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become more difficult to facilitate these programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate the e xisting demand of youth baseball and adult softball programs. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best site for softball field development. The fact that the County will not have to acquire property for this fac ility means that the most costly aspect of this development has already been completed. Sherando Park also provides a l ocation that is situated in the fastest growing area of the county and is adjacent to Sherando High School. Joint use of facilities bet ween the park and school system has facilitated school activities and recreation programs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22. PRIORITY 10 - Sherando Park Area 3 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the SW area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are rectangular play fields, a shared use trail segment, roadway and parking, playground, restroom, and maintenance building. Capital Cost: $2,250,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. With the development of N Sherando Softball Complex (CIP item #9) two rectangular play fields will be displaced. The develop ment of area 3 not only addresses this direct result, but also addresses additional identified needs of the community. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 11 – Playground Replacement Description: This project schedules replacement for playgrounds at County Parks. Acquisition of Parkland (35 acres) Capital Cost: $1,050,000 23 Justification: County park playgrounds are popular amenities at County owned parks. The playgrounds will need to be replaced to meet user expectations. Construction Schedule: This project is anticipated to be ongoing, a four-year schedule is proposed. Year 1: CB main playground, Frederick Heights. Year 2: CB 2nd playground, SH 2nd playground. Year 3: SH 3rd playground. Year 4: SH Main playground. PRIORITY 12 – Community Park Description: The Community Park project includes the acquisition of approximately thirty-five acres. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical development would include: • Acquisition of Parkland; 35 acres • Paved & Gravel Paths • Playground • Tot lot • Shelters • Lighted Basketball & Tennis courts • Open Play Fields • Toilets • Parking • Shade Trees & Turf Capital Cost: $2,194,000 Justification: Potential acreage for parkland would be located close to population density, east of Winchester, Redbud / Shawnee District area. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23. PRIORITY 13 – Neighborhood Parks Description: The Neighborhood project includes the acquisition of six sites of approximately ten acres and the subsequent development of these sites. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical development would include: 24 • Acquisition of Parkland, 10 acres per site • Paved Path • Playground • Shelter • Hard Surface Courts • Open Play Fields • Parking Capital Cost: $5,236,000 Justification: To reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the 2013 Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the Urban Development Area or Rural Community Centers. The location of this project would provide parkland developed to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents of Frederick County. Construction Schedule: 2021-beyond 24 PRIORITY 14 – Regional Park Description: Acquisition of Parkland; • Northeastern Frederick County 150-200 acres • Western Frederick County 150-200 acres • Eastern Frederick County 150-200 acres Capital Cost: $12,393,000 Justification: This project would meet the recreation needs of the Frederick County population. Construction Schedule: 2022-beyond 24 PRIORITY 15 - National Guard Armory Gym Addition Description: Through an agreement with the National Guard, Frederick County would convert the existing buildings assembly space to a gymnasium. The project includes flooring and air conditioning. Capital Cost: $510,000 25 Justification: The model in place since Orchard View Elementary was built in 2000 added gymnasium and multi-purpose space to elementary schools, as these schools are located where population growth is present. Growth in community programm ing, camps, and indoor sport leagues continues to create demand for more gymnasium and multi-purpose space. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23. PRIORITY 16 - S. Sherando Park Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the area of Sherando Park located south of Rt 277. This vision is expressed in the 2002 Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are rectangular play fields, skate park, roadway and parking, and restroom. Capital Cost: $2,137,000 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 PRIORITY 17 – Fleet Trip Vehicles Description: Bus #1 – 40-50 Passenger Bus Bus #2 – 30-40 Passenger Bus Van #1 – 12 Passenger Van Capital Cost: $322,000 Justification: To offer a comprehensive package of trips where the population of Frederick County could begin to rely on the Parks and Recreation Department to meet their trip needs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24. PRIORITY 18 – N Sherando Park Area 1 & 2 Development Description: This project completes the development vision for the area of Sherando Park located north of Rt 277 and Wrights Run. This vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Inc luded are multi-use trail, mountain bike trails, restrooms, pavilions, roadway and parking. Capital Cost: $3,127,000 26 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the ent ire Frederick County area. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Park s and Recreation Community Survey. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 PRIORITY 19 – Indoor Ice Rink Description: The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to accommodate a single 200’ x 85’ ice rink, locker rooms, party/meeting rooms, and concession area and would need approximat ely 10 acres to construct. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the County. The above ice rink may be collocated with other compatible uses should opportunities arise, reducing the acreage demand. Capital Cost: $6,489,000 Justification: There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and County residents currently must travel over one hour to use an indoor ice facility. By constructing the indoor ice rink, it would permit the department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as well as provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer year- round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2017 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. The Indoor Ice Rink facility should be located in an area convenient to the major transportation corridors of the County. However, as an alternative, one of the two County regional parks could be used to house the facility, since these locations are already identified as centers for recreati on programs and activities. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 27 Handley Regional Library Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Frederick County Library Branch - Gainesboro Description: Construction of a 4,000 to 5,000 square foot branch library, either as a stand-alone facility or co-located with a planned Frederick County facility (e.g. the new middle school). Initial parking should be for at least 50 vehicles. The proposed location would be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro District, but this could change depending on patterns of library use and on whether donated land could be located or if co-located with a Frederick County project already in the early planning stage. This projected branch would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing property and was outlined in a document prepared by FCPS students two years ago. Capital Cost: $1,749,034 Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area: In 2017-2018 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 463,265 items. 38000 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 60.3 % of all materials checked out of the regional system. 3018 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2016- 2017. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 53 % of the total h ave library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. This population group in the Gainesboro District is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational material s. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups ca n meet. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24. PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Library Branch - South Library Description: Construction of a 7,000 sq. ft. branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The firs t step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acre or collocated with the new High School projected to be built in the same area. Capital Cost: $3,043,235 28 Justification: This branch would serve a rapidly growing area per recent Frederick County documents. In 2017-2018 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 463,265 items. 38000 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 60.3 % of all materials checked out of the regional system. 3018 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library card s for the first time in 2016-2017. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 53 % of the total have library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the nation al average level of 58%. This population group in the Opequon District is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddler s to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 PRIORITY 3 - Frederick County Library Branch - Senseny/Greenwood Description: Construction of a 10,000 sq. ft. branch library with expansion possible to 15,000 square feet. Initial parking should be for a minimum of 65 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: This area contains a large number of single-family units that do not have easy or close access to any of our regional libraries. In 2017-2018 Frederick County citizens of all ages checked out 463,265 items. 38000 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 60.3 % of all materials ch ecked out of the regional system. 3018 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2016-2017. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 53 % of the total have library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. As noted above the population group in the Redbud/Shawnee District is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 29 County Administration Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - Albin Citizens Convenience Site Description: The relocation of the Albin site to property located within the Sunnyside/Albin Community is projected for FY 19/20. A preliminary agreement has been reached with Frederick County Public Schools to co-locate a facility at the former transportation center along Indian Hollow Road. The approximately two-acre project will require entrance enhancements, a turn lane, fencing, earthwork, retaining walls, electric, equipment, lighting, paving and landscaping and take several months to complete. Capital Cost: $1,224,000 Justification: During August of 2017, 17,006 vehicles visited the Albin facility, making it single most used solid waste facility outside of the landfill. This represented a five percent increase in usage over 2016. In 2018, the Albin site continued to experience growth in the number of users. The site averages 699 vehicles per day. On weekends this number can climb to over 900 vehicles. As trash disposal and the resulting traffic continue to increase, the present infrastructure will be unable to safely serve the public. During holidays, the site requires two attendants in order to manage traffic. However, lines still back out onto Indian Hollow Road during holidays and some weekends, creating a hazard noted several times by the Sheriff's Office. For residents living between Cedar Creek Grade and Apple Pie Ridge Road, curbside pickup is costly, prompting heavy utilization of the convenience site which attracts a mix of users from the suburbs and rural areas. A number of users from western Frederick also drop off their trash on their way into Winchester. Avid recyclers from Westminster-Canterbury, Shenandoah University, Shenandoah's School of Pharmacy and SU students living in nearby townhouses also frequent the facility. This project has the support of the Public Works Committee. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 2 - Gore Citizens Convenience Site Description: The project will expand refuse capacity in the Gore community by installing a surplus trash compactor. Converting the Gore facility from one which utilizes 10 8-yard boxes for refuse collection to one that uses a trash compactor will drive down collection costs dramatically. In order to accomplish this, and account for improved trash flow and the construction of a compactor and recycling staging area, the site will be expanded onto an adjoining parcel already owned by the County. This construction will take place over a period of months. 30 Capital Cost: $944,000 Justification: A total of 3,361 vehicles utilized the facility during August 2018, an increase of 10 percent. On a typical Sunday, usage peaks at 111 vehicles. The project will pay for itself in lower refuse collection costs through compaction of solid waste prior to transport. Also, with a compactor in place, refuse will be contained in an enclosed receiver can, reducing odor, vectors and blowing litter, all of which are challenges when using open collection cans. The project will also provide much-needed capacity during heavy flow times such as weekends and holidays. All 10 container s now fill to capacity during Saturdays and Sundays. Numerous times, the site has closed early on Sundays when capacity is reached. A 40- yard roll-off container is used during holidays to contain excess trash, an additional expense. An upgraded site will meet the current and future solid waste needs of the Gore community. The Public Works Committee supports this project. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21 PRIORITY 4 - General Government Capital Expenditures Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of General Governmental Capital Expenditures. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities. Such expenditures may be less than the established $100,000 departmental threshold. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is for the benefit of the County Governmental Entities participating in the CIP but does not include individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the governmental entities. Construction Schedule: N/A PRIORITY 5 - County/School Board Administration Building Description: This project consists of a County/School Board Administration Building, to be located generally in the County’s Urban Development Area. The Joint Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150,000 square foot office building shared with the County Schools Administration. The Schools’ portion would be 50,000 square feet. 31 Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government services in an accessible location. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 6 - Joint Judicial Center New Facility Description: This new project consists of a new future Joint Judicial Center Facility to be located generally in the City of Winchester or in the County’s Urban Development Area. Capital Cost: TBD Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and government services in an accessible location. The need for this project has been established through ongoing communication with the court system and the City of Winchester. Construction Schedule: TBD 32 Fire & Rescue Project Priority List PRIORITY 1- Shenandoah Valley Regional Public Safety Training Center Description: Construct a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially consisting of an administrative building, multi-story burn building, multi-story training tower, vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other training props. This project will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions located in Clarke County, Frederick County, Shenandoah County, Warren County, Winchester City, State Agencies, Federal Agencies, and potentially jurisdictions within the State of West Virginia. The Training Center will be located in the area central to the region which is the Middletown area of Frederick Cou nty. This area will facilitate necessary access by all participating agencies and jurisdictions as well as be incorporate d into the existing facilities of the Lord Fairfax Community College and the Rappahannock Regional Criminal Justice Academy – Middletown Campus. The Training Center will require between eighty (80) to one hundred (100) acres to facilitate the required bui ldings, associated props, and other training areas. The determination for the exact buildings, associated props, and training areas will be determined by the agencies needs assessed by the Public Safety Training Center Questionnaire that was distributed in July 2007. The proposed Training Center will be developed in a phased approach based on the strategic needs of the Northern Shenando ah Valley Region. The exact size, square footage, and capacity of the buildings, associated props, and training areas will also be determined by the agencies as well as designed the meet the specifications of the regulatory authorities within the Commonwea lth of Virginia. Capital Cost: $31,175,000 Justification: This project will facilitate realistic training in today’s modern environment for emergency services and industrial personnel located throughout the Northern Shenandoah Valley and expanding into the State of West Virginia. This project will reinforce existing training programs in those respective agencies and jurisdic tions as well as facilitate training that is currently not available within the Northern Shenandoah Valley which causes students and i nstructors to travel into the Washington Metropolitan region. The number of potential personnel being trained at this Training Center is potentially in the thousands based upon training statistics provided in July 2007 by the participating agencies . Construction Schedule: Long Range Project – Beyond FY 2024. 33 PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Fire & Rescue Station 22 Description: Construct a two bay Fire and Rescue Station with satellite Sheriff’s office and County office space for treasure, commissioner of the revenue, and BOS office with meeting room. The station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike, White Oak Road and Tasker Road to provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three-acre site will be needed to accommodate this facility. The fire station will be approximately a 10,000 sq. ft facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy the facility will determine the size of the satellite offices. Capital Cost: $3,400,000 Justification: This development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated community with age restricti ons on 80% of the homes above 55 and the other 20% above 45. The developer ‘s master plan will allow for 2130 individual dwelling units using a mix of housing types. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22. PRIORITY 3 - Frederick County Fire and Rescue Station 22 Apparatus Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22. Capital Cost: $1,100,000 Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East in the Stephens City area of Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Feder al KKK-A-1822E specifications and equipped with all of the required and nece ssary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance. This fire and rescue apparatus is needed due to the fac t that the Fire and Rescue Department currently owns one (1) pumper and one (1) ladder truck that are twenty (20) plus years of age and already assigned to other functions. The currently owned fire and rescue apparatus would not endure the demands placed on it while being assigned to a high call volume. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 4 - Fire and Rescue Station 23 / Annex Facilities Description: This project consists of a 10,000 square foot fire station to accommodate 4 pieces of emergency equipment, and to house living and sleeping areas for staff. This project could also include satellite offices for the Fre derick County Sheriff’s Office, Treasurers Office, and Commissioner of Revenue as well as a meeting room for County Supervi sor meetings with their constituents 34 with an additional 2000 square feet of building area. A two and ½ acre parcel should be sufficient for building, parking and amenities for approximately 20 to 30 persons. The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end of current Rt. 37 South, an area of proposed high-density residential development, and commercial development. Capital Cost: $3,700,000 Justification: As commercial and residential developments continue to expand in this area of Frederick County, a nd with the increased traffic on Rt. 37 and I-81, the calls for emergency services increases as well. To address the needs of the growing community and to maintain efficient response times, the addition of a new fire and rescue station is needed. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 Fire & Rescue Company Capital Project Requests Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue – Vehicles & Equipment Description: This new project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose o f purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was dete rmined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment will enable the County to meet the requirements of the Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire and rescue companies. Construction Schedule: N/A Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital and Capital Equipment Requests. Greenwood Fire Station – Renovation Description: Conduct a remodeling of the 2nd floor, approximately 4,600sq ft, to accommodate additional staff assigned to Greenwood. Capital Cost: $7000,000 35 Justification: With the increase in call volume the Career staff assigned to Greenwood has increased to 4 personnel 24 hour a day / 7 days a week. The current configuration is not sufficient to meet the 24 hour a day / 7 days a week s taff needs, nor does is allow space for the volunteers. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19/20 Clearbrook Fire Station – New Fire Station Description: Replacement of the existing Clearbrook Fire Station. Capital Cost: $4,696,000 Justification: In order to accommodate the career personnel 24 hours a day, our current facility’s living quarters are in critical nee d of upgrades. Between current staffing needs, equipment and fundraising operations, we have outgrown our facility. We have the option to swap land with the quarry on Route 11 and construct a new facility. This would give us much better access to Route 11. Or, we have the option to remain on our current property and construct a new facility on the East side. The old building would be removed, and that area would become the parking lot. Construction Schedule: FY 21-22. Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company– Building Addition 101 Description: Demolish original building and 1st addition to the station and rebuild new facility addition. This addition will provide larger sleeping quarters for males and females, locker rooms, bathrooms, offices, storage, physical fitness room and apparatus bays. Capital Cost: $3,100,000 Justification: It is essential for Middletown Volunteer Fire and Rescue Company Inc. to maintain our capabilities in emergency response and the facilities to house the apparatu s, tools and equipment and provide suitable living quarters for our members and FCFRD staff. Currently we are out of space in sleeping quarters for additional staff that is already slated to come, apparatus bay doors are too small for larger apparatus and the buildings are in need of repair. Construction Schedule: FY 20-21. Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company– Medic Unit Replacement (type 1) UNIT 11-3 Description: Replacement of a 2001 commercial chassis medic unit with a new commercial chassis custom Type 1 Medic Unit. The unit will be built to the Federal KKK-A-1822E or NFPA 1917 specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary 36 equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support transport unit. The apparatus will meet NFPA 1917/KKK-A-1822E standards and ISO requirements at the time of design, to include the required patient restrain and lift system and environmental controls needed for medicines required for EMS. Capital Cost: $240,000 Justification: 1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofitted to existing EMS apparatus. 2. Condition of Major Components - An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive train, transmission, engine, chassis, and patient compartment. These components a re approaching the expected service life. 3. Changes in National Standard s and Federal Mandates - Compliance with present Federal KKK-A-1822E, NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Service Occupational Safety and Health Program and NFPA 1917, Standard for Automotive Ambulances. 4. Maintenance Costs and Performance - All apparatus is tested and inspected annually. Records show a substantial increase in cost and frequency of repairs. Soon it will no longer be economical to continue investing in repairs. Construction Schedule: FY 19-20. Stephens City Fire and Rescue Company– Tower 11 Replacement Description: Replacement of a 1986 custom chassis ladder tower truck with a new year custom chassis ladder tower truck. The apparatus will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with the required tools and appliances to meet ISO standards at the time of build. The apparatus will meet NFPA standards and ISO requirements at the time of design. This project will begin approximately 6 months ahead of the design date with an ad-hoc steering/design committee. Capital Cost: $1,300,000 Justification: 1. Personnel Safety - Many of the changes in the new standards deal with safety and cannot be retrofit ted to existing fire apparatus. 2. Condition of Major Components - An examination of the major components of an apparatus has been made including the drive train, transmission, engine, ladder, platform, hydraulic systems, pump, chassis, and body. These components are approaching the expected service life or have already been replaced. 3. Availability of Replacement Parts - As apparatus get older, replacement parts may become more difficult to obtain, leading to longer periods of “down time." 4. Changes in National Standards or Federal Mandates - Compliance with present NFPA standards (1901, Engine Fire Apparatus; 37 NFPA 1500, Standard on Fire Service Occupational Safety and Health Program 5. Maintenance Costs and Performance - All apparatus is tested and inspected annually. Records show a substantial increase in cost and frequency of repairs. Soon it will no longer be economical to continue investing in repairs. Construction Schedule: FY 22-23. 38 Transportation Committee Project Priority List Funded Priorities PRIORITY 1 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1) Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Double Church Road. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive. Capital Cost: $35,944,878 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 2 -Airport Road Extension, East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over I-81 Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 522 and going west approximately 0.2 miles to connect to the road network being constructed by the Russell 150 Development. Construct Airport Road from Route 522 to a roundabout intersection with the Tevis Extension on the east side of I-81. Project includes bridge over Interstate 81. Capital Cost: $24,703,788 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address development to the surrounding area. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the County, VDOT, and the developer. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 3 - Renaissance Drive, Phase 2 Description: Construct a connector road and Railroad Crossing between Route 11 and Shady Elm Dri ve. Capital Cost: $5,791,500 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at key points along Route 11 and Apple Valley Drive. This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD 39 PRIORITY 4 - Sulphur Springs Road Intersection improvement and widening from Route 50 to the Landfill Description: Widen Sulphur Spring Road from the intersection with Route 50 to the regional landfill, add paved shoulders for pedestrians and bicycles, improve the intersection at Route 50. Capital Cost: $11,956,091 Justification: This project will address capacity and safety improvements to the corridor. This pro ject is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan. Construction Schedule: Entering design and right-of- way underway. PRIORITY 5 - Route 277 right turn lane extension at Warrior Drive Description: Extend right turn lane for eastbound 277 at the intersection of Rt 277 and Warrior Drive. Installation of sidewalk for pedestrian safety and installation of pedestrian pedestal. Capital Cost: $476,644 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 6- Papermill Road right turn lane extension at Route 522 Description: Extend right turn bay of Papermill Road (Route 644) where it intersects with Route 522 to allevi ate turn bay spillover that is taking place. Capital Cost: $507,262 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD Unfunded Priorities PRIORITY 7 - Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37 40 Description: This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension. More specificall y, to update the Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new Record of Decision and to update the 1992 design plans to address the current alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvements. In addition, this allows for advanced engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction. Capital Cost: $750,000,000 Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation improvement that would benefit the entire County and surrounding localities. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 8- Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $234,255,469 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address coming development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 9 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2) Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Sherando Park. Project would include realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive. Capital Cost: $25,428,550 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 10- Redbud Road Realignment and Exit 317 Ramp Realignment Description: Realign Redbud Road from its current location through development land in the vicinity of Route 11 north and Snowden Bridge Boulevard and Relocate the I-81 Exit 317 NB ramp to the current location of the Redbud Road/Route 11 intersection. Capital Cost: $11,239,132 41 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick Co unty. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 11 - Route 11 North Widening to 6 Lanes from Snowden Bridge Boulevard to Old Charlestown Road Description: Route 11 North of Snowden Bridge Boulevard is currently primarily a two-lane roadway. This project would widen that facility to a 6-lane divided roadway with turn lanes where appropriate. Capital Cost: $28,346,120 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will provide a significant capacity upgrade to address congestion on the Route 11 Corridor. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 12- Warrior Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with I-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange. Capital Cost: $47,000,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 13 - Channing Drive Extension Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where Channing Drive intersects from the north and continuing that roadway south to intersect with Route 50 East at Independence Drive. Capital Cost: $45,000,000 Justification: This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan and will address congestion in Eastern Frederick County and address development to the surrounding areas. Construction Schedule: TBD 42 PRIORITY 14 - Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11. Improvements to this intersection will address comprehensive planned development’s traffic generation in the area. Capital Cost: $3,800,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on the Route 11 corridor. The location is identified by joint planning efforts between the County and VDOT. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 15- Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line Description: Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the Eastern Road Plan. Capital Cost: $192,000,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion over a large area of the County and address development to the surrounding area. This projec t improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and improving the flow of traffic. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 16 - Senseny Road Widening Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with the implementation of Route 37, Channing Drive, and development in the area. Capital Cost: $67,000,000 Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick Cou nty. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 17 - Inverlee Way Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south to Route 50 East. This project is being planned in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and surrounding development. 43 Capital Cost: $27,300,000 Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion and provide an additional needed link between Senseny Road and Route 50 East. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 18 - Warrior Drive Extension from Route 37 Crosspointe south to existing terminus Description: 4 lane roadway from the Route 37 extension in the Crosspoint Development south to the existing term inus of Warrior Drive. Capital Cost: $33,500,000 Justification: This improvement would be concurrent with a Route 37 extension and would provide significant congestion relief at Exit 307 as well as Tasker Road at Exit 310 Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 19 - Senseny Road Turn lanes at the intersection of Senseny Road and Crestleigh Drive Description: Improvements to the intersection of Senseny Road (657) and Crestleigh Drive to include turn lanes and potential signalization. This project would add left and right turn lanes to Senseny Road at the intersection of Crestleigh and potentially a full signalization of the intersection. Capital Cost: $2,548,579 Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection. Construction Schedule: TBD PRIORITY 22 - Frederick County Eastern Road Plan Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan, Eastern Road Plan that are not noted individually above. Capital Cost: $TBD Justification: This project prepares the County for future development by addressing the projects needed to support that development in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Construction Schedule: N/A 44 Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 - New General Aviation Terminal Building, Site Work and Parking Lot – Design and Build Description: The Airport proposes design, bid, and construction of a new terminal building. The new facility will be constructed south of the existing building. Capital Cost: $6,115,400 Justification: The existing terminal building was constructed in 1989. Due to its age, numerous systems are in need of sig nificant repair or replacement. In 2008, a preliminary study was completed to examine needs and costs to renovate the existing terminal building. After review, the Winchester Regional Airport Authority (WRAA) determined it would be more economical to buil d a new facility. The project will also facilitate the construction of a new aircraft parkin g apron during the associated taxiway relocation project. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22 PRIORITY 2 – Taxiway “A” Relocation Description: The relocation of Taxiway A is part of the overall goal to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA ) design standards for Group III aircraft. Capital Cost: $16,870,000 Justification: This project improves the safety of airport operations and enhances our ability to accommodate large business aircraft. Due to the complexity of relocating the entire 5,50 0’ taxiway, the project has been broken down into phases over the next 4 years. Special consideration will be made to the timing of construction for the portion of taxiway that runs adjacent to t he terminal building also proposed for replacement. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24. PRIORITY 3 – Land Parcel 64B-A-51 (Moreland) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 51: Moreland on Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) runway protection zone (RPZ) design standards for Runway 14. Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $175,000 45 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regu lations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20 PRIORITY 4 – Land Parcel 64-A-69 (Robertson) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 69: Robertson off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design standards for the taxiway object free area (TOFA) for Taxiway "A". Services include a ppraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $160,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19-20. PRIORITY 5 – Land Parcel 6B-A-33A (Beaver) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 33A: Beaver off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) runway protection zone (RPZ) design standards for Runway 14. Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $125,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 6 – Land Parcel 64B-A-40 (Rosenberger) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 40: Rosenberger off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) runway protection zone (RPZ) design standards for Runway 14. Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. 46 Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstru ctions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 7 – Land Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 60: Cooper off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design standards for the taxiway object free area (TOFA) for Taxiway "A". Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $200,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstru ctions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 8 – Land parcel 64-A-64 (Hott) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 64: Hott off Bufflick Road to meet Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) design standards for the taxiway object free area (TOFA) for Taxiway "A". Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $160,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from o bstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21. PRIORITY 9 – Runway 14 Approach Lights Description: The airport seeks to construct an omni-directional approach lighting system (ODALS) to service Runway 14. The lighting system will enhance pilots' ability to identify the end of the runway, especially in poor weather conditions. 47 Capital Cost: $500,000 Justification: The project is depicted on the airport's approved airport layout plan (ALP), which was approved in conjunction the airport master plan. Future development adjacent to the airport has the potent ial to increase light pollution which can be distracting to pilots, thereby elevating the need for a lighting system to identify the runway location. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23. PRIORITY 10 –Fuel Storage Facility Description: The planned relocation of Taxiway “A” will encroach on the current fuel farm site. Further, the current site does not allow for expansion or upgrades to meet future DEQ and/or EPA requirements. Capital Cost: $1,000,000 Justification: The project is depicted on the airport's approved airport layout plan (ALP), which was approved in conjunction the airport master plan. A more suitable location has been identified to meet future capacity needs and compliance with future regulatory requirements. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 22-23. PRIORITY 11 – North Side Access Road Description: This project proposes to construct a two-lane service road around the end of Runway 14. The road will be an appropriate length so that vehicles remain clear of navigation aid critical areas. Capital Cost: $700,000 Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development on the north side of the runway. With operations on both sides of the runway, ground vehicles will require access to both sides for fuel delivery, inspe ctions, maintenance, and transportation of personnel. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) encourages the construction of service roads around aircraft activity areas, especially the runways, to prevent unauthorized access to runways and taxiways. A service road will accomplish these goals. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 23-24. PRIORITY 12 – Land Parcel 64B-A-52 (Lee) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64B A 52: Lee on Bufflick Road to ensure continued protection of sensitive airport areas. Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. 48 Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensure there are no operational impacts from obstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 PRIORITY 13 – Land Parcel 64-A-59 (Kyle) Description: The airport seeks to acquire parcel 64 A 59: Kyle on Bufflick Road to ensure continued protection of sensitive airport areas. Services include appraisals, review appraisals, negotiations, and fee simple purchase of the parcel. Capital Cost: $175,000 Justification: The parcel encompasses areas that must be protected in accordance with 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 77 and the Code of Virginia. This property must be controlled by the airport to ensur e there are no operational impacts from obstructions or incompatible land use in this area. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24 PRIORITY 14 – RPZ Land Services Description: Surveys, appraisals, review appraisals, and acquisition of 4 avigation easements identified on the airport property map; PE2, PE3, PE4, and PE5. Capital Cost: $250,000 Justification: The parcels underlie the approach path to Runway 14. Certain land uses have the pot ential to cause negative impacts to airport operations. Avigation easements will help protect the airport from consequences that may result from obstructions or incompatible land uses in these areas. Construction Schedule: Long range planning objective – beyond FY24