The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC 09-02-92 Meeting AgendaJ." �-V-W FILE COPY AGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia SEPTEMBEE y,�1992 7.00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Bimonthly Report ........................................... A 2) Committee Reports .......................................... B 3) Citizen Comments .......................... . ... . ........... C 4) Master Development Plan #005-92 Preston Place for 120 garden apartments. This property is located south of Route 645, 700' east of Route 522 South, in the Shawnee District. (Mr. Wyatt) .............................................. D 7:30 PM PUBLIC HEARINGS 5) Conditional Use Permit #009-92 of Charles and Faye Grady for a dog kennel. This property is located off of Route 735 on Route 709, in the Opequon District. (Mr. Miller) ...............................................E 6) Conditional Use Permit #011-92 of P. Diane McMillian, for a cottage occupation (stencil service and sales by appointment). This property is located off of Route 641, on Route 636, in the Opequon District. (Mr. Bise)................................................. F 7) Cancellation of Conditional Use Permit #025-79 of Powlen Equipment Company. This CUP for the sales and service of construction equipment was located on the west side of State Route 728 (Victory Lane) and on the east end of the Winchester Airport, in the Shawnee District. (Mr. Miller) .............................................. G OTHER 8) Other (attachment). ........................................................ H M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report DATE: August 25, 1992 (1) Rezonings Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Twin Lakes 4/04/90 (Shaw) (RA to B2/RP) John & Jane McAllister 7/09/92 (Opeq) (RP to B2) (2) Rezonin s A roved: dates are BOS meeting dates None (3) Rezonin s Denied: dates are BOS meeting dates None trmt.facil Grace Brethren Church 6/08/90 (4) Conditional Use Permits Pending: dates are submittal dates Ston Lgt. Industrial Hampton Chase Charles & Faye Grady 06/25/92 Opeq Dog Kennel Lewis Boyer, II 07/08/92 Shaw Landscaping Business Diane McMillian 08/06/92 Opeq Stencil Sales & Service (5) Conditional Use Permits Approved: dates are aRRroval dates John Merrill 08/12/92 Gain Off premise sign Joan & Kristi Riggleman08/12/92 Gain Bridal Consultant (6) Site Plans Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Wheatlands Wastewater Fac. 9/12/89 Opeq trmt.facil Grace Brethren Church 6/08/90 Shaw church Flex Tech 10/25/90 Ston Lgt. Industrial Hampton Chase 12/18/90 Ston S.F. & T.H. Lake Centre 05/15/91 Shaw Townhouses 2 Red Star Express Lines 05/24/91 Ston Whse. Addition Winchester Airport 03/02/92 Shaw Increased safety zone/road relocation Freeton 04/27/92 Opeq Townhouses Signal Station 06/25/92 BkCk Car wash addition Winchester Church of God 07/29/92 BkCk Church (7) Site Plans ADoroved: (dates are approval dates) Greenwood Baptist Ch. 08/11/92 Shaw Church & Parish (8) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Hugh Price 08/17/92 Shawnee (9) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (P/C approval dates Abrams Point, Phase I Frederick Woods Hampton Chase Lake Centre Fredericktowne Est. (sections 5, 6 and 7) Coventry Courts Senseny Glen Freeton Battlefield Partnership Fairfax Drive Ext. Deer Run @ Sherando 6/13/90 5/16/90 02/27/91 06/19/91 10/16/91 Shawnee Opequon Stonewall Shawnee Opequon 12/04/91 Shawnee 12/04/91 Shawnee 05/20/92 O p e q u o n 05/20/92 Back Creek 08/05/92 Opequon 08/19/92 Opequon (10) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates Preston Place 08/10/92 Shawnee (11) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: dates are BOS approval dates Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back Creek Hampton Chase (revised) 05/27/92 Stonewall Freeton 06/08/92 Opequon (12) FMDP Administ. Approved dates are admin. aRRroval dates None 3 (13) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pendinq:(submit. dates Russel & Mary Reid 08/12/92 Ston 10" side (existing house) Joe Edmiston 08/21/92 BkCk 46 . 5' s i d e (existing garage) Oakcrest Builders 08/21/92 Shaw 9' rear (deck) Dolly Cooper 08/21/92 Shaw Lot size & area Cecil Aff lect, Jr. 08/21/92 BkCk 6' side (existing attached carport) (14) BZA Applications Approved• (approval dates) H. Bruce Edens 07/17/92 Ston 7.5' Sign Setback Rbt. & Tamara Symons 07/24/92 Shaw 18' Garage Rbt. & Sherrill Price 07/24/92 Opeq 5' Addition (15) BZA Applications Denied• Wm. H. Pfahl 08/06/92 Opeq Adm. Appeal (16) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER None P/C Review Date: 9/02/92 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #005-92 PRESTON PLACE 120 Garden Apartments LOCATION: South of Route 645, east of Route 522 and west of the Winchester Regional Airport MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 64000OA000045B PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned R -P (Residential Performance) land use - vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned R -P (Residential Performance), B-2 (General Business), and M-1 (Light Industrial) and RA (Rural Areas) - Land use - residential and vacant PROPOSED USE: 120 garden apartments REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Vir inia De t. of Transportation: No objection to preliminary master plan. Before making any final comments, this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Fourth Edition for review. Before starting any construction on the State's right-of-way the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Fire Marshal: Eave heights on buildings make emergency egress via ground ladders impossible. Ladder truck access is necessary. With the exception of fire land access, all other fire/rescue comments will be addressed on site plans or construction drawings. All previous comments regarding town house area remain in effect. During construction access to all buildings for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times. (see attached comments from Doug Kiracofe, Fire Marshal). Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 309, Use Group R-2 (Residential Use) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other codes that apply are Part 6, Code of Federal Regulation, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 24 CFR, Chapter 1, Fair Housing Accessibility. will comment on office use group at the time of structural and site review. Sanitation Authority:_ First review - nine items, correct and resubmit. Parks and Recreation: The plan appears to meet open space and recreational unit requirements. Specifications on the pool, multi -use court, tot lot and recreation building need to be reviewed by staff prior to final approval. The location of the picnic area within the 100 yr. flood plain is undesirable and an accessible route to the area must be provided for the disabled. All recreational amenities must meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (A.D.A.) guidelines. County Engineer: See attached comments from Harvey E. Strawsnyder, dated August 10, 1992. Planning & Zoning:_ The Preston Place Master Development Plan is a revision to the approved Master Development Plan for Silver Communities Townhomes. The original Master Development Plan.was approved for 117 townhouse units on 22 acres. The revision to this plan calls for the addition of 120 garden apartment units on 20 acres. This revision proposes a total of 237 dwelling units on 42 acres, creating a gross density of 5.64 units per acre. This meets the gross density requirement of 8 units per acre for Master Development Plans that are greater than 25 acres but less than 50 acres. The original Master Development Plan specified that all land south of Route 645 would be undeveloped at that time. The revision to this plan proposes 120 dwelling units within 10 apartment buildings. The proposed apartment units are a permitted use in the RP (Residential Performance) District. The applicant has indicated that there will be an average of 10 dwelling units per building. Staff believes that this should read 12 dwelling units per building; however, either number complies with the maximum requirement of 16 dwelling units per building. Staff concerns regard common open space, disturbance of environmentally sensitive land, and future residential development. The applicant has indicated that future residential development will occur, but has not provided the acreage needed for this future development. Staff believes that the applicant will not have difficulty meeting the common open space requirements; however, it is difficult to determine if the disturbance of environmentally sensitive land will comply with ordinance requirements at this time. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 9/02192 PC MTG.: Approval, provided that common open space and environmentally sensitive land is designated to insure conformance with existing and future development requirements, as well as addressing all review agency comments. I COUNTY of FREDERICK PROJECT NAME: PROJECT DESIGNER: COMMENTS: Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering & Inspections 703/665-5643 FAX: 703/678-0682 August 10, 1992 Preston Place Apartments South of Route 645, near Winchester Regional Airport Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates 1. The revised master plan includes 22.0 acres dedicated to townhomes and 20.0 acres dedicated to 10 apartment complexes. The latter development represents the primary reason for the revised master plan. Based on our discussions during the technical review committee meeting,. we understand that detailed site plans were developed for the 22.0 acres of townhouses. This design should have included a stormwater management plan and related calculations. These calculations should be included with the detailed design submittal for the apartment complexes. 2. The revised master development plan refers to an existing pond as a storm water management pond. A detailed evaluation of this pond will be required before it can be used as a stormwater management pond. It should be noted that a majority of the stormwater from the 22 acre townhome site flows through this pond. These flows plus the additional flows from the apartment project should be incorporated in the evaluation of the existing pond. 3. The property boundary bisects the existing pond. A drainage easement will be required in areas outside the project's property boundaries. Submitted by, L.m�-- Harvey Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Frederick County Virginia Date: Aucrust 10, 1992 Application P-02Lq�, OWNERS NAME: Preston Place Associates, L.P. 2801 Southwell Place 1 r31 otnian Vi inia 23113 (Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest) APPLICANT/AGENT: Castle Development Corporation Address: 2801 Southwell Place Midlothian Vir inia 23113 Daytime Phone Number 804-794-0553 DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Address: 107 North Kent Street, Suite 100 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone Number 703-722-4721 Contact Name David Spriggs 7 PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that all required information is provided or is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the preliminary master development plan. All required items must be provided on the PMDP. Background Information: 1. Development's name: Preston Flace 2. Location of property: North and South of Route 645, 700' East of Route 522 3. Total area of property: 41.96 Acres 4. Property ID # (14 Digit) 64000 A 00000 45B 5. Property zoning and present use RP - vacant 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: M-1 and B-2 vacant, RA and RP vacant and residential 7. Proposed Uses: 120 Garden Apartments and recreation facilities (117 Townhomespreviously approved) S. Magisterial District: Shawnee 9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original Amended X 8 General Information• I. Have the following items been included? North arrow Yes X No Scale Yes X No Legend Yes X No Boundary Survey Yes X No Total Area Yes X No Topography Yes X No Project Title Yes X No Preparation and Revision Date Yes X No Applicants Signed Yes No X Consent Statement 2. Number of phases proposed? 3 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes Nom_ 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes. x No 5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. - Yes X No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yeses^ No 7. Are environmental features clearly shown? Yes X No 8. Describe the following environmental features: J Total Area % Disturbed Acres in (Acres) by development Open Space Floodplains — 3.5 0 3.5 Lakes and ponds 0.7 0.1 - 5.7 Natural retention areas r, Steep slopes ' v 0 (15% or more) 5.6 1.4 4.2 Woodlands--�— J 9. Are the following shown on the master development plan? Street layout Yes X No Entrances Yes_Z_No Parking areas Yes X No Utilities (mains) Yes X No 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Yes X No 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes X No N/A Residential Uses If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. What numbers and types of housing are. proposed? 120 Garden Apartments, 12 units per building 96-2 Bedroom, 24-3 Bedroom (117 Townhomes approved previously) 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes X No Acreage in each housing type Yes X No Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes X No Total acreage Yes -X No Number of dwellings of each type Yes X No 3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space? 700 10 4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes X No 5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed? _2001, Multi -use court, tot lot, picnic area and Recreation Building/ Office for the Apartment development. _ 6. Are separation buffers required? Yes X No 7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes X No S. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required? Yes X No 9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by the plan with profiles or examples? Yes X No �' J i�& jkt-.11- ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Owners of property adjoining the Land will be notified of the public hearing. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a road from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the 14 digit tax parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. NAME - Silver Communities, Inc. Address 4500 Plank Road Fgedericksburg, VA 2401 Property IDO 64 -((A)) -45C C. Douglas and Fern Adams Address Rt. 1, Box 206-A Winchester, VA 22601 property ID# 64 -((A)) -45D C. Douglas Adams Address Rt. 1, Box 206-A Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64-((A))-45 Leonard James GreathousE Address Rt. 1, Box 149-A Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64C -((A))-14 John W., Jr. and Peggy B. Foster Address Rt. 1, Box 150 Winchester'VA 22601 Property ID# 64C -((A))-10 Elwood H..Whitacre, Sr. Address Rt. 1, Box 154 Winchester, VA Property —19601 ID# 64C -((A))-7 Ruth Walter Address #7 W. Argyle Street ckvi D 20850 Property Ib# 64C -((A))-8 Waitman L. and Anna B. Collins Address Rt. 1, Box 151 Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64C-((1))--15 Address Property ID# Address Property ID,# COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator WO\, SUBJECT: Grady CUP, #009-92 For a Dog Kennel DATE: August 21, 1992 At the regular meeting of the Planning Commission on August 5, 1992, the application of Charles and Faye Grady for CUP #009-92 was presented to the Commission. This request was for a dog kennel that exists on the Grady's property on Route 709 in the Opequon District. The Commission tabled this request pending additional concerns being addressed. During a visit to my office on August 20, 1992, the Grady's requested that their CUP application be withdrawn. The reason for the request was that they were attempting to refinance their home and their bank would not do that if they were operating the kennel business. They stated that they wanted to keep the 50 plus dogs but that now they would just be "our dogs" and they would not be selling dogs. I advised them that the proposal as presented by them would not remove the fact that they are a kennel and even if they withdrew the application, the violation would still exist-. After much discussion and negotiation, they agreed to attempt to change all that might be necessary so I could rule that they were no longer operating a kennel. Specifically, I suggested the following actions on their part: 1. Reduce the number of dogs to a reasonable level that one might expect someone in their situation to possess as, in their terms, just "our dogs". 2. Relinquish their business license. 3. Individually license their dogs vice keeping them covered under the kennel license. 4. Complete all actions necessary within 30 days. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 Page 2 Memorandum, Planning Commission Grady CUP #009-92 August 21, 1992 The Gradys agreed to these terms and understand that failure to comply will require that they go forward with the CUP application or criminal charges may be filed against them. I also advised them that I would not accept withdrawal of the CUP as a solution to the violation at this time since that would put me in a position of having to file charges immediately. I agreed to allow them 30 days to comply with our agreement and if compliance is forthcoming, I would honor a request to withdraw the application. Based on the information presented here, request the application for CUP #009-92 be tabled for an additional 30 days. P/C Review Date: 08/05/92 P/C Review Date: 09/02/92 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #009-92 Charles & Faye Grady Dog Kennel LOCATION: Route 11 south of Stephens City off of Route 735 on Route 709 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER 850000A0000130 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas), land use - residential and dog kennel ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas), land use - residential and agricultural PROPOSED USE: Dog Kennel REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: No objection to conditional use permit for this property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT minimum commercial standards. Fire Marshal: Any space open to public must satisfy building code for Use Group B. Approval of this CUP will not havea significant impact on Fire -Rescue resources. inspections Department• Building shall comply with the' Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 303, USE Group B, (Business) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other codes that apply are title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the basis of Page 2 Grady CUP Disability by Public Accommodation and in Commercial Facilities. Permit required would be a change of use on existing building. Health Department: Sanitary facilities adequate for operators of kennel. Kennel operation approximately 60 - 70 dogs. State Waster Control Board has ultimate authority over dog waste disposal. No objection at this point. Planning Department: Application is for an existing, illegally operating, kennel. Mr. and Mrs. Grady previously had a conditional use permit for a kennel and were unaware that the County required a new conditional use permit when they moved. The kennel is approximately 1500 feet from the rear and side property lines and is screened from the front by a natural berm. Since the kennel operation is for the breeding and sale of dogs, there will not be overnight boarding of dogs, other than their own, to cause noise. And because of the substantial distance from other properties, noise nor odor should be a problem. Staff believes approval of the conditional use permit would not change the character of the neighborhood. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AUGUST 5, 1992: Approval, with the following conditions: 1. All review agencies comments must be complied with. 2. Change in use or expansion of facilities to accommodate this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. 3. All associated materials shall be stored indoors. 4. If a sign is displayed, a sign permit will be required. 5. All requirements of the Frederick County Code and the Code of Virginia pertaining to the operation of dog kennels must be complied with. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS OF AUGUST 5, 1992: Tabled unanimously for 30 days in order to determine if Mr. and Mrs. Grady are in compliance with the concerns of the Dog Wardens Office. (Absent - J. Marker and R. Carper Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting -9, I I APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the owner other) NAME: (' —1 P <l ADDRESS: i TELEPHONE G2 C? �� v 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: v � v ;Lt z, 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions) �-+- I 1 � • -�-� � 3 J �- I/uL YV � � --�'-� — /a rn', --I -a 7� 9 Lf -4-4- 4. The property has depth of (Please be exact) a road frontage of (hr �e €sem feet and consists of go, c /(o and a acres. 5. The property is owned by u A h E N,:! 5: as evidenced by deed from LgM1;f:, p O C I / recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. on page �, registry of the County of Frederick. 6. 14 -Digit Property Identification No. 3 Magisterial District oQac oc)") Current Zoning �c 0 7. Adjoining Property: USE North _ 1�e5�dc✓tai East __ Qr_si�cv►kR�l South West ZONING page -2- CUP Application August, 1990 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) � •7 N.^3Q 9. It is -proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: Iv 7 f`,f_ 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property sought to be permitted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14 -DIGIT NUMBER. MAMF. Address�t � Q 'I (p H•a�5 �_ Property ID# 3 /3 f7 chOvkj C SLIl Address' j � S 64,e-ph-em5 0i Property ID# 3-- ;5rS- 14 - 13 rl� n�cve-�n Rh►� v�� Address`- Property ID# Address Property ID# 3 -- SS Address Property ID# Address Property ID# page -3- CUP Application August, 1990 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. '1Q 1/ 4- ' % page -4- CUP Application August, 1990 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. 25. P/C Review Date: 09/02/92 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #011-92 P. DIANE MCMILLIAN Cottage Occupation Stencil Service and Sales by Appointment LOCATION: Off of Route 641 on Route 636 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER 860000300000BO PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas), land use - residentiai - ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: -Zoned RA (Rural Areas),_ land use - residential and agricultural �- - - g PROPOSED USE: Cottage Industry - stencil_service and sales by appointment REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: No objection to conditional /special use for this property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT minimum commercial standards. Fire Marshal: Approval of this CUP will have no greater impact on fire and rescue resources that the current occupancy. Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 303, USE Group B, (Business) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other codes that apply are title 28 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 36 Nondiscrimination of the basis of Disability by Public Accommodation and in Commercial Page 2 McMillian CUP Facilities. Permit required shall be a "Change of Use" on existing building. Health Department: No objection to the issuance of this permit as long as water usage is not increased via the addition of employees other that current occupants. (7-29-92 Ms. McMillian stated that no employees would be added). Planning Department: This application is for the establishment of a Cottage Occupation for. stencil service and. sales by appointment. The applicant is currently stenciling goods on a consignment basis at another location, and now wishes to expand the business to include sales by appointment at her home. The business will be conducted from within the attached garage and will require no additional employees other than the applicant. This application is considered a Cottage Occupation since the applicant will be displaying a sign and there is retail sales involved. R. Adequate parking exists for approximately two customers and the proposed use should have no adverse impacts on surrounding'- properties. urrounding__properties. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SEPTEMBER 2, 1992: Approval with the:, following conditions: 1) No structures shall be expanded to contain the use nor new structures constructed to contain the use, unless a revised C.U.P. is obtained. 2 ) No more than one sign shall be placed along Route 636 and it shall be limited to four square feet. 3) Sales shall be limited to appointments only. 4) Hours of operation shall be limited to 9:00am to 9.:00pm. 5) All review agency comments shall be complied with. Submittal Deadline 9- 7 -96Z - P/C -96Z -P/C Meeting 9 _cv_ _q12 -, BOS Meeting 9 L I APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applica n t (The applicant /7if the owner other) NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions) LL'dL'/ /7;4 yv 'A &Lf -,I/ d = 4. The property has a road frontage of ® feet and a depth of feet and consists of acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by �� (� as evidenced by deed from Q recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. 15� on page Jl registry of the County of Frederick. 6. 14 -Digit Property Identification No. _ � papo 3 o o oao 13 (n Magisterial District p - Current Zoning = 7. Adjoining Property: USE ZONING North East South r s West 0 page -2- CUP Application August, 1990 S. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) 9. It is -proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: 2 Q.vmn %3 a- k--, 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property sought to be permitted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14 -DIGIT NUMBER.) NAME n Address Property ID# p y g 6 Ovo coo 0 (SIX0 ' Address Property ID# 70� J 26 • Address Iq Property ID# t6 000a d, o0 U V 0.1 l� D� c) ,�• Address Stapp•. -•s �'{ e• o - ��u "3 VS Property ID# 'k b t00-0 WD a 0 w2 w � WAX\ Address Property ID# S'(o O D 3 Address Rt \ d3 �- 7.5 g S-sC Property ID# c� (� OOaO o' 0 D 0 0 zK page -3- CUP Application August, 1990 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including - measurements to all property lines. io � page -4- CUP Application August, 1990 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make applicat+on and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors'. public hearing. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. U/ (703)S6�- X35'3 � Vf7L 2p26 S WS IS TO CBSTDT TW ON •D 3'T 27. 1990 Y xAm A]r Accn= O? . '1'� pltS�IIgSS WWn -AM SSCV! Ir>�aitwmmmmm `,>r�oi zo ' xx T . � y0 SOB �caOACZKL r_�'x PS TISIBLS ON M G30IISD oT� TW PLLT Is a C()Zm IN DSSn Boor 365 1T PAZE 211. '!!{>L LOT Doss XM TALL nr i 7LOOD ZAZAn zo1M. -z��ALTx 0) LAND OF o-� WILLIAM E. & SANDRA R. SRNOR I DGE OPEOUON DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA U Mig AL g N0. M55 • I MASIELLO 704/523 �LID SU5 a lPF - yti COSBY p o� 663/18 0 00 N �474Ey 105.00' IRON FD FD N 43°00'00"E LOY 384 /125 w o' B3at TO IPF RTE,. 641 N 0�. D �O c\( � J IPS '00"E 120.00' 2 5 43025'02"w 398:38' 1 STORY BRICK 2.9209 ACRES POWERUW- �2ra"E 2g N 32 TATE {�p�T E 636 5 t3Q' WIQEZ- R:: HOUSE LOCRTION SURv FURSTE:NAU.. SUR V EYING STEPHENS CITY, VIRGFNI',:.�2.265' AXLE FD. f4- • r,j• i ate..;.;,7 • O RA r � M _ • or. / 4 _ • a C w I r/ 4> m.A RA R� s 11 A COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM To: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator RE: Conditional Use Permit #025-79 DATE: August 20, 1992 During the annual review and renewal of all conditional use permits (CUPS), it was brought to my attention by the Shawnee District Supervisor, that CUP #025-79 for Powlen Equipment Company, needed to be cancelled since the company was no longer operating their facility in Frederick County. The Powlen Equipment Company was located off of Route 728, Victory Lane, near the airport. The facility here was a branch of their main office located in Hagerstown, Maryland, which continues in operation. On August 13, 1992, 1 talked with Mr. L.J. Powlen, Jr. on the phone and he confirmed that they would no longer be operating from the Frederick County location and that the Conditional Permit #025-79 could be cancelled. I asked Mr. Powlen to provide that request in writing and he declined. He stated that he thought we could go ahead and cancel the permit and that he did not want to be bothered with providing us a letter request for cancellation. Based on the conversation with the owner, I recommend cancellation of Conditional Use Permit #025-79. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 1665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator" SUBJECT: Annual Planning Commission Retreat l DATE: August 25, 1992 The 1992 Planning Commission Retreat will be held on November 14, 1992 at the Country Inn in Berkley Springs, West Virginia. Please reserve this date on your calendar and I will provide more information in the not too distant future. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604