Loading...
PC 03-18-92 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 0 The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia ( W" Y March 18, 1992 � P o nl 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 1) Meeting Minutes - February 19, 1992 ............................. A 2) Monthly and Bimonthly Reports ................................ B 3) Committee Reports ......................................... C 4) Citizen Comments .......................................... D 5) Preliminary Master Development Plan #001-92 of Battlefield Partnership for commercial uses. This property is located between Route 11 South and I-81 in the Back Creek District. (Mr. Wyatt) ................... E 6) Revised Master Development Plan #002-92 of Village at Sherando for single family detached homes, townhouses, patio homes and commercial uses. This property is located north and adjacent to State Route 277 in the Opequon District. (Mr. Wyatt) ......................... F 7) 1992 Primary Road Improvement Plan. (Mr. Wyatt) ................ G 8) Other ................................................... H MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on February 19, 1992. PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman; Manual C. DeHaven, Stonewall District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; John R. Marker, Back Creek District; Todd D. Shenk, Gainesboro District; George Romine, Shawnee District; Marjorie Copenhaver, Back Creek District; Roger Thomas, Opequon District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Beverly Sherwood, Board Liaison and James Barnett, City Liaison. ABSENT Ronald W. Carper, Gainesboro District Planning_ Staff present were: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary; Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Director; and W. Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MEETING MINUTES -JANUARY 15 1992 Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Thomas, the minutes of January 15, 1992 were unanimously approved as presented. 0 BIMONTHLY REPORT Chairman Golladay accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's information. INTRODUCTION OF MR JOHN LIGHT, NEWLY APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE FROM STONEWALL DISTRICT . Chairman Golladay introduced Mr. John Light, who was appointed as a new commission member representing the Stonewall District. Mr. Light's first term will be from 2/12/92 to 10/31/93. COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plan - 2/10/92 Mtg, Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee reviewed several requests to expand the sewer and water service area. The subcommittee also prioritized activities in their "Action Program". Winchester City Planning Commission Mr. Todd Shenk reported that the Leesburg Corridor Plan was discussed. Mr. Shroeder, Winchester City Planning Commissioner, said that the City is studying all the major avenues coming into the City --Valley Avenue, Route 11 North, Route 522 and Amherst Street --with the idea of having either a special exception to the approach or to having an approach overlay. Mr. Shroeder said that the City will do this comprehensively for the whole City and wishes to coordinate their efforts with Frederick County. 3 Sanitation Authority -2 j10/92 Mrs. Copenhaver reported on the following items: 1) The Northern Loop Waterline, established to increase water pressure and supply to the Fredericktowne/Albin Village /Lakeside area, should be in service this week. 2) A loan was received and engineering design commenced for the water treatment plant at the quarry. 3) Discussion was held regarding the two alternatives to the Parkins Mill expansion -- either pumping water over to the Opequon plant or expanding Parkins Mill. Mrs. Copenhaver expressed concern about future development of that land if the trunk line is run from the Parkins Mill Plant to the Opequon. She asked if the County could deny access to the sewer line. 4) Two other project priorities discussed for the County were the Fort Collier Industrial Park and water on Route 522 South from the airport to Southview Subdivision. Fort Collier Industrial Park is to be connected to the Stonewall Storage Tank. Historic Resources Advisory Board - 2/18/92 Mtg. Mr. Watkins said that the committee discussed the idea of recognizing significant historic sites with a plaque program. Economic Develo ment Commission Mr. Romine said that he met with the Transportation Committee and the Virginia Department of Transportation regarding several industries' concerns over road problems on Route 11 North. Mr. Romine said that VDOT now acknowledges that a problem exists and can address it. 11 SUBDIVISIONS Subdivision Application of Hershey Extension of Park Center Drive and Brooke Road in the Stonewall District. ACTION - APPROVED Mr. Miller said that Park Center Drive is located approximately 1,750' southeast of Route 11 North and Brooke Road is located approximately 1,350' northeast of the intersection with Fort Collier Road. He said that this application will be the final phase that will complete the two roads up to the boundary of the Hershey Foods property. This will be the limit of VDOT's acceptance and maintenance. Mr. Bruce Edens, with Greenway Engineering and Surveying Company, said that all requirements of VDOT have been met. Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve the Hershey Extension of Park Center Drive and Brooke Road. This property is located southeast of Route 11 North and northeast of the intersection with Fort Collier Road, in the Stonewall District, and is identified as GPIN 540000A0000810. Request for exemption from the Rural Land Use Regulations of the Frederick County Subdivision Ordinance by Fred Harner. ACTION - REFERRED TO DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND REGULATIONS SUBCOMMITTEE Mr. Wayne Miller stated that by a letter dated February 5, 1992, Mr. Fred Hamer is requesting that he not be required to build a road to the tertiary state standards that are required by the Subdivision Ordinance, Page 18-4-14, Section 4-16-2.1. The road in question, Dove Drive, is located in section 5 of Lake Isaac Estates at Gore in the Back Creek District and is depicted on the submitted plat as the 60' right-of-way going from State Route 610 northwest to proposed lot 46 and then right to the Dove property to the north. Mr. Miller said that as the plat is presented, the applicant would only be responsible for the road that will serve lot 46, although the right-of-way and existing road serves as access to the Dove property to the north. Mr. Miller said that the staff does not feel that approval would have 5 significant impact on future situations of similar nature, but there may be facets that should receive -additional scrutiny. Mr. Miller felt that it may be in the best interest of all to have this request and future similar requests, sent to the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee for recommendations. Mr. Fred Harner came forward and said that he was requesting exemption from building Dove Drive to State standards. Mr. Harner indicated that the Dove property is served by an existing 12' right-of-way. The Commissioners commented that Mr. Harners plat showed a 60' right- of-way going from Route 610 to Lot 46. They felt that if Mr. Harner did not intend to provide a 60' right-of-way to the Dove property, then the plat needs to indicate such. Mr. Miller pointed out that because Mr. Harner is subdividing lots 46 and 47, the right-of-way is considered a "shared private driveway" and must be a minimum of 50'. To avoid precedent setting for future requests of this nature, the Planning Commission felt that the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee should review this request and present their recommendations before the Commission takes action. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously agree to refer this request to the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee for their recommendation. Mr. Harner said that, because of the delay, he would withdraw this plat and submit a new plat without a right-of-way from Route 610 to lot 46. He said that he could access the lot from an existing subdivision. OTHER Discussion on Work Program for the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee NO ACTION Mr. Watkins said that the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee was formed to discuss all regulations related to Frederick County's rural r and urban areas. He said that they will accomplish this task through ordinance review, discussion of interpretations related to ordinance language, and plans review of certain development projects prior to public hearings. Mr. Watkins stated that the primary goal of the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee in 1992 will be to execute a comprehensive review of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with particular emphasis on: Article II - C.U.P.'s 2-7 ( requirements and procedures) Article III - Buffer and Screening Requirements 3-12 (effectiveness) Article VI - Residential Planned Community District (R4) Article IX - Business and Industrial Zoning Districts 9-2 (allowed uses) 1992-1993 Capital Improvements Plan for Frederick County ACTION - APPROVED Mr. Watkins presented the 1992-1993 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) for Frederick County. Mr. Watkins explained that this is a five-year plan for capital facilities within the County. He further explained that the plan comes before the Planning Commission because it needs to be tied in with the idea of comprehensive planning in the County. He said that the Planning Commission initially reviews the plan to insure that the development of facilities is in conformance with the planning ideas and processes in the County. The staff and the Commission reviewed and discussed the various projects within the plan. Mrs Sherwood inquired if the Senseny Elementary renovation included air conditioning and also if the renovation was being considered to be moved further back on the list. Mr. Watkins replied that the renovation did include air conditioning. He said that the School Board removed the boiler project, but felt the other projects were appropriate. Mrs. Sherwood said that the committee questioned funding for the library and although their project is ongoing, it was moved back another year. Mr. Watkins said that library representatives felt that decision was realistic. Mrs. Sherwood said that the committee felt the Parks and Recreation projects were appropriate. VA Mrs. Copenhaver commented that there were no requests from Fire and Rescue. Mr. Watkins said that they were contacted, but did not respond. Mr. Watkins felt it was the intention of the Fire and Rescue Department to develop a coordinated CIP for all Frederick County Fire and Rescue companies. Mr. Thomas suggested that possibly next year, the County could support the James Wood Swim Team by adding an indoor swimming pool to the CIP list. Mr. Thomas said that the pool could be utilized year-round by the swim team and the Parks and Recreation facility could also use the pool for sports and therapeutic exercises for the residents of the County. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the 1992-1993 Capital Improvements Plan for Frederick County as presented, with no changes in the project priorities. Installation of Monitoring Cells on Route 522 South NO ACTION Mr. Watkins said that this item is from the Transportation Committee and that they are sending it on to the Board of Supervisors. He said that the Committee endorsed a request by Shawnee District Supervisor W. Harrington Smith, Jr., to recommend that VDOT install monitoring cells along State Route 522 South and Interstate 66. This request was endorsed as a means to monitor truck traffic that bypass the weigh scales located on I-81. Mr. Watkins said that the Transportation Committee believes that the installation of monitoring cells will enable the VDOT to determine truck traffic patterns and assist with strategic planning. The Commission accepted this item as information. Resolutions of Appreciation for Rural Issues Subcommittee Citizen Members ACTION - APPROVAL Mr. Watkins presented Resolutions of Appreciation for the citizen members of the Rural Issues Subcommittee for their work in developing land use �-O regulations intended to preserve the rural nature of Frederick County. The resolutions honored Gary DeOms, James M. Douglas, Gerald Crowell and Robert Holmes. The Commission unanimously endorsed the resolutions. Adjournment No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting was adjourned at 8:20 pm. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Watkins, Secretary James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman MONTHLY REPORT Comparison of Accumulative Monthly Totals Zoning anuary \ Hz wa Total t7w pq 1/90 � 89 Lz/88 1/ 8 Total 1y�a/' 8 0 o a 7 W o HH0 E-1 LD E-1 3 0 U 0B 1-4 WM f ' F' r4 E-1 P4 0O 0 0 �E, EQ � 0 pp U U U U U U TOTAL PERMITS AP- PROVED FOR ZONING 13 11 9 23 19 75 12 10 6 5 34 67 170 96 63 96 -45 1. Multi -family 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 84 10 0 26 0 2. Single-family dwellings 2 3 1 13 6 25 4 2 2 2 1 11 30 40 24 27 20 3. Mobile Homes 0 1 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 1 10 8 3 9 4 - New Units 01 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 - Replacements 0 0 0 0. 11 0 1 4 7 2 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 1 6 2 4. Industrial 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 5. Commercial 1 6 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 4Ij 14 0 11 3 3 6. Miscellaneous 11 7 8 10 6 42 6 3 3 3 24 39 32 37 25 311 17 PERMITS - County Total 200 150 100 50 0 'AL. - 1986 19 7 � — ---' 1988 1989 19 0 19 1 1 92 TOTAL: County Single Family Dwellings FOR COT j -_ _ _ _ _ g Mobile H --es - Industrial & Commercial (coml !d) M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report DATE: March 5, 1992 (1) Rezonin s Pendin : Idates are submittal dates Twin Lakes 4/04/90 (Shaw) (RA to B2/RP) Marshall Williams 3/12/91 (Shaw) (RA to M2) Zuckerman Co. 12/04/91 (Ston) (M1 to M2) (2) Rezonin s Approved: dates are BOS approval dates None (3) Conditional Use Permits Pending: dates are submittal dates David A. Darnell 2/20/92 Stone Tool & Die Shop (4) Conditional Use Permits Approved: dates are approval dates Kim Nail 2/26/92 Gaines Retail Sales - Archery Equipment Kim Nail 2/26/92 Gaines Off Premise Sign John Mayhew 2/26/92 Gaines Gun sales & repairs (5) site Plans Pending: dates are submittal dates Wheatlands Wastewater Fac. 9/12/89 (Opeq) Grace Brethren Church 6/08/90 (Shaw) Winc. Warehousing 9/05/90 (Ston) Flex Tech 10/25/90 (Ston) Hampton Chase 12/18/90 (Ston) Lake Centre 05/15/91 (Shaw) Red Star Express Lines 05/24/91 (Ston) Youth Development Ctr. 09/11/91 (Shaw) Fred. Co. Landfill 02/20/92 (Shaw) trmt.facil church warehouse Lgt. Industrial S.F. & T.H. Townhouses Whse. Addition Youth meeting facilities New Scale Nouse 2 Winchester Airport 03/02/92 (Shaw) Increased safety zone/road relocation (6) Site Plans Approved: (dates are approval dates) Sherando Softball Complex 02/24/92 Opeq Softball Fields Dr. Thomas Gromling 02/25/92 Opeq Medical Ofc. Add. Hershey Pasta Group 02/27/92 Ston Pasta Production Facility (7) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Lot 26 -Ft. Collier 03/02/92 (Stan) Commercial (8) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (P/C approval dates Abrams Point, Phase I 6/13/90 Shawnee Frederick Woods 5/16/90 Opequon Hampton Chase 02/27/91 Stonwall Lake Centre 06/19/91 Shawnee Hershey Property 10/02/91 Stonewall Fredericktowne Est. 10/16/91 Opequon (sections 5, 6 and 7) Covenrty Courts 12/04/91 Shawnee Senseny Glen 12/04/91 Shawnee (9) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Battlefield Partnership 02/21/92 Back Creek Village At Sherando (revised) 02/24/92 Opequon (10) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: (dates are BOS approval dates Wakeland Manor (revised) 2/26/92 Shaw (11) FMDP Administ. APRroved dates are admin. approval dates None 3 (12) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pending•(submit dates) None (13) BZA Applications Approved• (approval dates) None (14) BZA Applications Denied• None (15) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER None P/C review date: 03/18/92 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN BATTLEFIELD PARTNERSHIP #001-92 16.3 ACRES LOCATION: Four miles south of Winchester between Route 11 South and I-81. Approximately 3200 feet from the Route interchange. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 75000030000110 and 7500003000011B PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business, General), land use - vacant PROPOSED USES: Commercial REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No overall objections to preliminary master development plan. However, prior to any further street construction or lot development this office will -require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Fourth edition, for review. Before starting any construction on the State's right-of-way the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Sanitation Authority- Approved as noted. Inspections Department• Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code 1990. The Building Department shall comment on Building Use Group at the time of Building Plans review. Fire Marshal: Emergency vehicle access is adequate. Fire lanes required at all hydrants per Frederick County Chapter 10. Roads meeting VDOT standards satisfy all fire department requirements. Page 2 Battlefield Partnership Master Development Plan County Engineer: Prior to road construction, we request copies of the detailed site plans, with corresponding road profiles, culvert inverts and ditch sections. We also request a copy of drainage calculations to verify adequacy of existing drainage structures. Planning and Zoning: The proposed Master Development Plan is being reviewed specifically for parcels owned by Battlefield Partnership (marked in yellow on your plans). Some lots in the vicinity of this development were previously owned by the applicant and have been subdivided, sold, and developed. The site currently includes Marathon Drive, Musket Drive, and Sulky Drive, water and sewer, fire protection, drainage easements, and existing facilities such as Marathon Bank, Donald B. Rice Tire Company, Stroehman Breads, and Snappy Lube. Two issues that are the basis for a required Master Development Plan are the proposed extension of Sulky Drive which will connect with U.S. Route 11 South, and the creation of a stormwater management pond that will serve the developed areas, as well as future development. Review agencies appear to be satisfied with this plan, provided that they receive additional information related to road and site drainage. Staff concerns regard the maintenance of the proposed stormwater management pond, as well as its location. With this area being owned by many individuals, staff believes it is prudent to require an acceptable maintenance agreement for this facility. The location of the proposed stormwater management pond will make it difficult to develop the western side of Sulky Drive, as the stormwater management pond and the twenty (20) foot drainage easement can not be encroached by development. Staff will require the applicant to address minor plan revisions prior to final plan approval. These items include total acreage of the area owned by Battlefield Partnership, zoning classification of property numbers 1 -Al, 1--A2, 2, 3, and 4, and administrative information. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 03/18/92 P/C MTG.: Approval, provided that all review agency comments are adequately addressed and an acceptable maintenance agreement is furnished to the County. APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Frederick County Virginia Date: 5-3/-9l Application # C'/-qo OWNERS NAME: �ATTC�.�/EGO P�ler�yEeSff/� (Please list the names of all owners, principals, or majority stockholders.) APPLICANT/AGENT : �Re,F., /u).44Z , /il/C, Address: 116,,f _,qwE , GU�c/c�1EST E� Phone Number 66z - ql65 DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: G,2EF�lc(JAU l //1(C Address: Phone Number Contact Name n r7 r,= t-. PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that all required information is provided and to insure that all information is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the master development plan. All required items must be provided on the master development plan. Background Inf =-- tion : 1. Development's name: lagm.€F/e12d 2. Location of property: A27. -Il 4vAoyC 4*y' 5 ct�LeslhnlC S7F,e 3. Total area of property: _ 16,3 j94AwgS 4. Property identification numbers: Tax map 7S' Tax parcel // 18 Tax ID # ( 21 Digit) %50,00 - - mcs�-c oo--c�oir8 S. Property zoning and present use — z WCo9AI7- 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: B z_ 7. Proposed Uses: C" ,+JAWd1A,1-, 8. Magisterial District:_ 1546le �'.�•EE,� 9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original V' Amended General Information: 1. Have the following items have been included? North arrow Yes ✓ No Scale Yes- ,%– No Legend Yes�� No Boundary Survey YesNo Total Area Yes No Topography Yes- No Project Title Yes No Preparation and Revision Date YesNo– Applicant Name Yes No 2. Number of phases proposed? AI.OA146 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes No 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes ✓ No 5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. Yes ✓ No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes ✓ No 7. Are environmental features clearl shown? Yes ✓ No 8. Describe the following environmental features: Total Area % Disturbed Area in Open Space Floodplains d Lakes and ponds p Natural retention areas O Steep slopes (15% +) — 6,.,. Woodlands 0 9. Are the following shown on the master development plan? Street layout Yes No Entrances YesNo Parking areas Yes No—v' Utilities (mains) Yes ✓ No 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Yes ✓ No 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes ✓' No 12. The plan should include signature lines for the Director of Planning and the County Administrator. Have the signature lines been included? Yes ✓ No Residential Uses M% If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. What housing types are proposed? 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes No Acreage in each housing type Yes No Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes No Total acreage Yes No Number of dwellings of each type Yes No 3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space? 4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes No 5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed? Please list all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, to the rear, and in front (across the street) of the property in question. Please list the name, address, and most importantly, the camplete 21 -digit property identification number. This information may be obtained from the Commissioner of Revenue's office. Please attach additional sheets, if needed. Name : �G !� •�TitlE.�5.4�/P Address:___ g22,,K ze,3¢ Property I . D . # : -001123 Name: ArTL E i ,v Address: 23-,3 /2,0_ ,vc,ShESr Z Property I . D . # :TSDo�-a�3 -oQoa -moo- oGb6o - 00 /9 o TN,ed 00 r9 a 7�jp00 -Ao0-000©-0000 -pp//o Name: E cs 4� CG Ee .nv,2rif/E,2S� Address: 0934 Property I . D . # : 75CJOD -Aaa- oc2a0 - ocda - cry//C _ 75004 X0.3-0000 -moo - acb90 Name: / i/G E t? Address: /6 21c.j::�Z7-7-Z Oe. �,lli.tlC.5�Ef7 /L Property I . D . # : __ 75 pp0 !'m,�7 - Co00 - ODDO - Oo 1/E Name: Z)oly,96D C,- Address; Address: / 8.oy A41D,f�,67ZvOAI LIA OZ645 Name: O,erN .STEplleNS&V 1XIC, Address: 12��' 6 Bay 54j3 l,(Ji.Vcs',SrE� Property I . D . # :75cap(-,4oQ - OLa - Coco - QO //G T5 000 - 003 - 0-004 - cc;co - ealoo Name: 76,4AI 4S.Soc17r-,7S tJM1lfD Address: 609 7-,6A1Ai z Property I . D. # : Sono -003- 0aao - c�--oc� o Name:- 42,47'IV Lel41y) 712z)-17- Address : PO. ,4 Zz 6 SS Property 1. D. #: _ 76 -Coo - G�V3 - c000 - QQM - 000'70 - • - oco6o Name: / Qreo,,vAG. 6411g-.01 GEASi 6 IAIC. Address: PO. ,eSrm1-,vz7-AE-,f-- - /V0. 221 S7 Property I. D. #: -75600- 003 - Coco - cp00- 00/00 Name : FeAlTA TH dZ 41-,4Ayd %2LC2T Address : Re, AS 44,STEP ox 7 .4. Zz65S Property I . D . # : cc//O Name: Address: Property I.D.#: Name: Address: Property I.D.#: Name: Address: Property I.D.#: P/C review date: 03/18/92 REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN VILLAGE AT SHERANDO (Formerly Evans/Snyder MDP) #002-92 Revising 6.65 acres of 55.4293 LOCATION: North and adjacent to State Route 277, east of Stephens City and 1750 + east of State Route 641. Approximately 1.75 miles east of I-81 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 86000OA0001020 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business, General), and RP (Residential Performance) - land use - vacant, residential PROPOSED USES: Residential and Commercial REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation• No objections to the revised master development plan for this property. However, since several different pavement sections for the proposed 60f right-of-way (Golladay Drive) have been previously approved during site plan review we suggest the one shown be corrected or removed. Before making any final comments this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculation, and traffic flow data for review. Before any work is started on the State's right-of-way the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Sanitation Authority• Approved Inspections Department• Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building code and Section 309 Use Group R, Residential use of the BOCA National Building Code, 1990. Fire Marshal: See attached comments, dated February 19, 1992, from Douglas A. Kiracofe, Frederick County Fire Marshal. Page 2 Revised MDP Village At Sherando County Engineer: Verify that the gravity sewer line paralleling the steep slope area will adequately tie into pre existing 15" sanitary sewer without conflicting with the improved Wrights Run Channel. No other comments at this time. Parks & Recreation: See attached comments, dated February 20, 1992, from Jim Doran, Director of Parks & Recreation. Planning and Zoning: The revised Master Development Plan submitted would amend the approved Master Development Plan of 11/15/90 to include patio homes. This amendment will modify what was originally 17 single family cluster lots to 32 patio home lots. Modifications in this area, as well as the single family cluster area will increase the overall units in the proposed development from 164 to 183, or 4.4 units per acre. The applicant has shown additional pedestrian walkways throughout the proposed development. One of the three required recreational units in the townhouse area is not shown on the revised Master Development Plan. A temporary patio home sales model with customer parking and signage has been permitted in the B-2 (Business General) Zoning District. An affidavit for temporary commercial uses has been provided by the applicant. This states that the temporary patio home will be removed from the property by November 1, 1992. The modification from 17 single family cluster lots to 32 patio homes has increased the length of the northern cul-de- sac from 270 feet to approximately 600 feet. The primary concern of staff regards required open space. Section 5-4-1 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum percentage of the gross area of any proposed development to be designated as common open space. This development contains 51% townhouse lots, 31% single family cluster lots, and 18% patio home lots; therefore, the minimum open space requirement is 300. The total gross area of the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District is 38.65 acres, which would require 11.60 acres of open space. The applicant is providing 9.73 acres of open space. Minor project summary information on the revised Master Development Plan, such as total acreage, original Master Development Plan approval date, and total open space required by RP use needs to be modified on the revised plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 03/18/92 P/C MTG.: Approval, provided Page 3 Revised MDP Village At Sherando that all review agency comments are addressed, the issue regarding required open space is resolved, and the plan is modified to incorporate the project summary information. AFFIDAVIT FOR TEMPORARY COMMERCIAL USE OF B-2 PROPERTY IJONN c� �4P,7 a% of address DEER RUIV QOM40, G/?E-AT j4:A1-Z-E A ZZp6�� hereby affirm that I will remove my temporary model home sales office located on a parcel of land zoned B-2 in Frederick County, Virginia identified as (GPIN) 860000A 0000102 by November 1, 1992. I further affirm that I will submit a sketch plan to the Department of Planning and Development showing that the following requirements are met: the temporary entrance shall be installed to the current VDOT standard PE -1 specifications, a graveled parking area of 1260 square feet shall be provided (7 spaces at 180 square feet each), a buffer as defined in Category B of the Frederick County zoning Ordinance shall be provided, and any and all Health Department, Build,ing Code, and Fire Marshall requirements shall be satisfied. Signature State of Virginia County of Frederick /G'//L/-oe , a notary public in and for the state and county aforesaid, do hereby certify that on this day�� fLy(J � ��Dti personally appeared bef re me and acknowle gee the above affidavit dated ill .CGS /9yZ- that affirms the requirements for the temporary use of his B-2 parcel of land. Given under my hand this day of .%, �C 1992, /& Notar Public My Commission expires Z�Z COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. 0. BOX 278 RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824 COMMISSIONER February 20, 1992 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN RESIDENT ENGINEER Mr. John D'amecourt Ref: The Village at Sherando Subdivision C/0 Deer Run Homes Route 277 905 Seneca Drive Frederick County Great Falls, VA 22066 Dear Mr. D'amecourt: This is to follow-up on our telephone conversation of February 19, 1992 concerning your company's desire to install a terr!perary entrance to a model home/'office in the referenced det-eloprlent. As I said since the te;nporary entrance road into the develop--ent is not in the State Secondary Road Syste:-, we have no objections to installation of the entrance. However, we do suggest the entrance be installed to our current standard PE -1 specifications at approxi_ -ate Station 1+50. This should provide a safe distance between your entrance and Route 277, I have enclosed a copy of our standard PE -1 specification with the required dimensions and culvert size noted in red. Should you have any questions or would want to review the proposed location, please give me a call or Mr. D. W. Hawkins at 703-722-3+60. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans, Resident Engineer Ice A By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Specialist Sr, RBC/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. D. W. Hawkins (w/ enclosure) Mr, R. W. Watkins Dr. John McAllister (w/ enclosure) Mr. Mike Carroll (w/ enclosure) Mr. Mike Hammer (w/ enclosure) TR_a.!Vq P0PTAT1(lai Cno T_r • 4q. .._tea C� CT- % T- - �6p��cTOR GRADE E. OF SVE DRAINAGE"Y/ AS S C' Ln S �P-P—S 1 G N x C) C� C) CD 0 E D R/' TEMP. 50' INGRESS-E-E-1- 7�, UP Cz , x 3 12- 'I"'ATE-R W -JN -to --7- N/F Rt Z77 _UCAS cs,7.-. n-e'cessc ry provide orV.,m.�posjtj 'e �-drcincge -ONED. RA I_I'L r 1 ( (Surface- Crusher Run Aggregate No. 25 or 26 52' - -' Note: Lengths of culverts shown on road plans for entrances are approximate and shall be adjusted to obtain above roadway widths. Note. 1111 entrance grades sholl start buck of the shoulder line. If drainage is necessary, the ditch line may be moved back to provide at least 9" of cover over pipe, as shown of right. k 1\2' or existing width whichever is greater. w` ld U � IQ I;o�� Q I n_ 1 U j61' l N rfCK t o012 in W 30 a, L L U ;ulverts if necessary. MAIN ROAD PAVEMENT Entrances in fill to be some as above except location of culvert (when necessary). 'L U W tea, o v '_^ E 1 IY Z crit in 1 I U Z Q z W X W U - ---cif z _ D U) W IL n. z U a J 0- X X 0 ILL V L � 0 � Q t— W o v W TE iE > 1_ o e, o .c W z cn W F- > a Z W J Q --t— SPECIFICATION STANDARD PRIVATE ENTRANCES REFERENCE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT 514 o/ 602.02 HIGHWAYS AND TRANSPORTATION C& ^TY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE LAND DEVELOPMENT COMMENTS Control No. 0805910713 Date Received 020492 Date Reviewed 021992 Applicant Name G, W. Clifford & Assoc' Address 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Project Name Village At Sherando Phone No. 703-667-2139 Type of Application Rev- Master Plan Current Zoning RP 1st Due Fire Co' 11 1st Due Rescue Co' 11 Election District Opequon RECOMMENDATIONS omatic Sprinkler System Residential Sprinkler System X Automatic Fire Alarm System X Other Emergency Vehicle Access; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Fire Lanes Required; Yes X No Comments: Fire lanes required at all hydrants per Frederick County Chapter 10' Roadway/Aisleway Widths; Adequate X Inadequate Not Identified Special Hazards Noted; Yes X No Comments: This subdivision will intersect Rt. 277 across from entrance with Sherando High School, Currently I am told this will not be a signaled intersection' As addressed on Sherando High School plans, I feel this matter is very important to the safety of students and area residents, Hydrant Locations; Adequate Inadequate Not Identified X Siamese Connection Location; Approved Not Approved Not Identified X Additional Comments: 1) No burning of construction debris is permitted at any time. C) Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times during construction. 3) During construction, post temporary street signs and address signs. Review Time .`s hr. l+o�.ta 1 .a �� r� a �..I1 •�_L ��fLu SLANG APS --0VED I I R F MARSHAL, FREDEIRi'DK Ca©UNTY REQUEST FOR REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department ATTN: James Doran, Director P.O. Box 601, Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 665-5678 The Frederick County Parks & Recreation Department is located on the second floor of the Frederick County Administration Building, 9 Court Square, Winchester, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: JEJP Corp. Rt 1 Box 198 Stephenson, Va 22656 (703)893-7500 AGENT: G.W. Clifford & Assoc. 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Va 22601 Attn: Ron Mislowsk' (703)667-2139 Name of development and/or description of the request: The Village @ Sherando (formerly Evans/Snyder) Location: North_ & Adjacent to St Rte 277 east of Stephens City and 1750 ± east of St Rte 641 Approx. 1.75 miles east of 181. Parks & Recreation Department Comments: See Attached Parks Signature and Date: 2/20/91 (NO.fI'ICE TO PARKS - PLE-ASE RETURN THIS FORM TO THE AGENT.) / NOTICE TQ APPLICANT Z t is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. February 20, 1992 Parks and Recreation Department Comments Master Development Plan - The Village at Sherando This Master Development Plan provides for approximately 25% open space while being required 30% open space. 1 would recommend that credit be given for the 5% open space that is lacking if the developer is agreeable to completing a bicycle/pedestrian travelway which would extend from Georgetown Court to the Frederick County Park property line. I would also suggest that the planned pedestrian travelway be redesigned to conform with a comprehensive bicycle/pedestrian plan for the entire development. If such a travelway could be created, which would provide controlled access to Sherando Park and Sherando High School, I would also recommend that only one tot lot be required for this development. Please note that detailed specifications for all recreational units will be required during the site plan review stage of this project. APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST REVISED MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Frederick County Virginia Date: 21 February 1992 Application # Afa-9,�. OWNERS NAME: JEJP CORPORATION (Please list the name of all owners or parties in interest) John & Jane McAllister APPLICANT/AGENT: JEJP Corp / G W Clifford & Assoc Inc Address:Rt. 1,Box 198 / 200 N Cameron St Stephenson Va 22656 / Winchester Va 22601 Phone Number: _(703)893-7500 / (703) 667-2139 DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: G.W. Clifford & Assoc Address: Phone Number: (703)667-2139 Contact Name: Ron Mislowsky FEB 2 4 1992 PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that all required information is provided and to insure that all information is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the master development plan. All required items must be provided on the master development plan. Back round Information: 1. Development's name: The Village @ Sherando 2. Location of property:North & Adjacent to St. Rte 277, east of Stephens City and 1750 ± east of St. Rte. 641. Approx. 1.75 miles east of I-81. 3. Total area of property: 55.4293 Ac.`,,�rr;c, 4. Property identification numbers: Tax map: 86 Tax parcel: 1.02 Tax ID # (21 Digit): 86000-A00-0000-0000-01020 5. Property zoning and present use:RP/B-2 (Vacant & Residential) 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use:RA (Vacant)_. RP__ (Residential) & B-2 (Proposed Capitol Properties Shopping Center) 7. Proposed Uses:Single Family Detached, Townhouses, Patio Homes & Commercial 8. Magisterial District:Opequon 9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original Amended—X– General Information: 1. Have the following items been included? North arrow Scale Legend Boundary Survey Total Area Topography Project Title Preparation and Revision Date Applicant Name 2. Number of phases proposed? 2`n7O 2 Yes—X_ No Yes—X— No Yes—X— No Yes_X_ No Yes—X— No Yes—X— No Yes—X— No Yes_ X No Yes—X— No 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes—X— No 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes No—X- 5. oX5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. Yes—X— No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes—X— No 7. Are environmental features clearly shown? Yes—X— No 8. Describe the following environmental features: Total Area o Disturbed Area in Open Space Floodplains 0 0 0 Lakes and ponds 0 0 0 Natural retention areas 0 0 0 Steep slopes (15% +) _5.0 _14.0o_ _3.7 Ac_ Woodlands _13.0 _24.9%_ _4.16 Ac 9. Are the following shown on the master development plan? Street layout Yes_X—No Entrances Yes_X_No Parking areas Yes _,X_No Utilities (mains) Yes_X,No 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Ye s_X_No 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes—No—X- 12. esNo_X 12. The plan should include signature lines for the Director of Planning and the County Administrator. Have the signature lines been included. Yes X No Residential Uses If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. what housing types are proposed?Single Family Detached, Town houses, Pati Homes & Commercial 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes _X_No Acreage in each housing type Yes _X_No Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes _X_No Total acreage Yes _X No Number of dwellings of each type Yes_X—No 3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space? 25.2% 4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes—X_No 5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed? 2 Tot Lots, 1 Volleyball Court & 1 Half B B Court & Walking Trail (4-1/2 Units) 6. Are separation buffers required? Yes X No 7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes X No 8. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required? Yes_X No 9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by the plan with profiles or examples? Yes_X_No 10. Are any of the following bonus improvements proposed to be used? Recreational Facilities Yes No X_ Energy Conservation Yes No_X_ Pedestrian or Bikeway System Yes No_X_ Underground Utilities Yes No_X_ Street Design Yes X No 11. How many bonus factors have been earned? _Three (3) in SF Detached 12. How will the bonus factors be used? Three (3) in SF Detached Please list all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, to the rear, and in front (across the street) of the property in question. Please list the name, address, and most importantly, the complete 21 -digit property identification number. This information may be obtained from the Commissioner of Revenue's office. Name: J. Carson Cline Address: Rt.l, Box 354 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-5-F Name: Lewis M. Costello & Douglas M Keller Address: Rt.l, Box 507 Toms Brook Va 22660 Property I.D.#: 75-A-72 Name: Saidie Huffman c/o A.F. Huffman Address: Rt.l Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-111 Name: John E. & Jane P McAllister Address: Rt.1, Box 198 Stephenson Va 22656 Property I.D.#: 86-A-88 Name: Donald R. & Audrey L Shiflett Address: Rt -1, Box 355 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-5-E 86-5-H Name: John B. & Clara E. Shiflett Rt.1, Box 353 Stephens �'�tv Va � Address: -- 265 Property I.D.#: 86-5-G Name: R.W. & Ruth Story Address: Rt.1, Box 361 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-90 Name: Robert N. & Cora W. Strosnvder c/o Cora Strosnvder Address: Rt.1, Box 358 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-5-B Name- Marjorie H. Teets Address: Rt.1, Box 345 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-110 Name: County of Frederick Address: 9 Court Scruare Winchester, Va 22601 Property I.D.#: 86-A-135 Name: Fruit Limited Partnership c/o Capitol Property Address: 100 Carpenter Dr,Suite 202 Sterlina,VA 22170 Property I.D.#: 86-A-80 Name: Leroy Orndorff Address: Rt.1, Box 351 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-103 Name: Clarence & Norma W Lucas Address: Rt.1, Box 350 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-104 Name: Lucien M. Grimm Address: 540 Massie Drive Winchester Va 22601 Property I.D.#: 86-A-106 86 -A -117A Name: Paul V. & Debra L. Funk Address: Rt.1, Box 349 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-105 Name: Steven Allen & Barbara K Stickley Address: Rt.1, Box 347 Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-107 Name: Ross & 011ie C. Boyd Address: Rt.1, Box 346 Stephens City Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 86-A-108 Name: Ryland Groff Address: 4510 Daily Dr. #500 Chantilly Va 22021 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-1 Name: Top of Virginia Address: P.O. Box 3276 Winchester,Va 22601 Property T.D.#: 75J-1-2 75J-1-3 75J-1-4 Name: Phillip W. & Nancy Colantonio Address: 643 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-5 Name: Bryan J. & Kathy A. McGoniaal Address: 653 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-6 Name: Mark H. & Mildred F. Howard Address: 661 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-7 Name: Kenneth L. Strother Address: 668 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-8 Name: Brian K. & Roberta L. Matheson Address: 677 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-9 Name: James L. & Leslie H. Tucker,Jr. Address: 685 Westmoreland Dr.Stenhens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-10 Name: Troy J. & Patricia D. Campbell Address: 693 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-11 Name: Walter E. & Marian L. Robinson Address: 701 Westmoreland Dr Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-12 Name: Steven J. & Christina L Snodgrass Address: 705 Westmoreland Dr Stephens City Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-25 Name: David B. & Tonva J Harp Address: 715 Westmoreland Dr Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-26 Name: Gerald J. & Joanne M McMullen Address: 721 Westmoreland Dr Stephens City Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-27 Name: Gregory D. & Rhonda G McGee Address: 729 Westmoreland Dr Stephens City Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-28 Name: Richard J. & Cheryl A Dunn Address: 737_ Westmoreland Dr Stephens Citv, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-29 Name: SMarc & Viviane C Deltmel Lampert Address: 745 Westmoreland Dr Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-30 Name: Richard D. Farrow Address: 753 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-31 Name: Robert L. & Christina Marie Adams Address: 761 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-32 Name: Debra A. & James R. Sanders Address: 769 Westmoreland Dr.Stephens City, Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-33 Name: J.E.J.P. Corporation Address: Rt.1,Box 198 Stephenson, Va 22656 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-34 Name: Top of Virginia Development Corp. Address: P.O. Box 3276 Winchester, Va 22601 Property I.D.#: 75J-1-2-35 Name: John E. & Jane P. McAllister Address: Rt.1,Box 198 Stephenson, Va 22656 Property I.D.#: 75K-1-1 Name: Thomas H. & Jacouelyn T. Sowers Address: 449 N. Braddock St. Winchester Va 22601 Property I.D.#: 75K-1-5 Name: Donald N. & Sandra A. Law Address: P.O. Box 878 Stephens CIty Va 22655 Property I.D.#: 75K-1-9 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703/665-5651 FAX 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II t; RE: 1992 Primary Road Improvement Plan DATE: March 4, 1992 Enclosed is a copy of the Frederick County 1992 Primary Road Improvement Plan. This plan was reviewed by the Frederick County Transportation Committee on Monday, March 2, 1992. The Transportation Committee revised the proposed plan to place item numbers 1, 2, and 3 ahead of the Eastern By-pass/loop. Staff believes that item numbers 1 and 2 are appropriate, as Route 522 South is currently funded for construction, and the Winchester Area Transportation Study is evaluating the I-81/11 North/37/661 Intersection; however, staff believes that the Eastern By-pass/loop needs to be placed ahead of the Route 277 project as a priority item. Listed below are revisions to last years plan: A) Route 522 North has been omitted, as it is scheduled for completion this year. B) Route 522 South has been moved from item #7 to item #l. C) I-81/11 North/37/661 Intersection has been moved from item #8 to item #2. D) Route 277 has been moved from item #9 to item #3. E) The Eastern By-pass/loop has been moved from item #2 to item #4. F) Improvements to major intersections has been incorporated into other road improvement item numbers. THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS 9 N_ Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601 1992 PRIMARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1) Route 522 South (East of Winchester) From: Route 50/17 East Intersection To: Route 277 East Intersection (North of Double Toll Gate) Improve to four lanes and provide intersection improvements as necessary to coordinate with Route 37 extension and Route 277 improvements. The improvements should begin at the southern end and proceed northward. 2) I-81/11 North/37/661 Intersection (North of Winchester) Implement corridor improvement plans resulting from Winchester Area Transportation Study to deal with immediate deficiencies. 3) Route 277 (East of Stephens City) From: I-81/277/647 Intersection (South of Winchester) To: Route 340/522 South Intersection (East of Double Toll Gate) Improve the existing two lane road facility by widening and straightening immediately. Conduct detailed studies to determine future needs for four lane improvements and improvements to the I-81/11 South/277/647 intersection area. 4) Eastern By-pass/loop From: Route 37 North at Stephenson To: Route 37 South at Kernstown Plan, engineer, and acquire necessary right-of-way to provide future additional limited access arterial capacity east of Winchester. This is needed to accommodate planned land use and economic development in Eastern Frederick County. This will include long term solutions to interchange areas at 1-81 /11 North/37/661 and I-81/11 South/37/642. Page -2- 1992 Primary Road Improvement Plan 5) Route 11 (North and South of Winchester) A. Route 11 South From: Middle Road To: 37 Interchange Widen and improve to five lanes. B. Route 11 North From: Winchester City Limits To: 37 Intersection Widen and improve as necessary. 6) I-81 (East of Winchester) From: Stephenson Interchange To: Middletown Interchange Study and improve to six lanes between Winchester exits if necessary.