PC 01-15-92 Meeting AgendaAGENDA
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Old Frederick County Courthouse
Winchester, Virginia
January 15, 1992
7.00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) Election of Officers and 1992
Meeting Schedule (No attachments) ............................. A
2) Meeting Minutes - November 20, 1991 ............................ B
3) Bimonthly Report .......................................... C
4) Committee Reports ......................................... D
5) Citizen Comments ........................................... E
6) Discussion re: the schedule for subcommittee meetings for 1992.
(Mr. Watkins) .............................................. F
7) Subdivision Application of J. I. C. Ltd. to subdivide 4.6674 acres into two -
lots. This property is located at the intersection of Route 728 (Victory Lane)
and Route 1000 in the Shawnee District. (Mr. Miller) ............... G
8) Site Plan Application #025-91 of Sherando Park Softball Complex for softball
fields. This property is located on Route 277 East, across from Sherando Park
in the Opequon District. (Mr. Wyatt) ........................... H
PUBLIC HEARINGS
9) Rezoning Application #010-91 of Zuckerman Co., Inc. to rezone 24 acres from
M-1 (Light Industrial) to M-2 (Industrial General) for a scrap metal and material
handling recycling center. This property is located on the west side of Route
119 north of Winchester, in the Stonewall District.
(Mr. Tierney) ............................................... I
OTHER
10) Memo re: Resolutions of Appreciation ............................ J
11) Memo re: the withdrawal of rezoning application #008-91 of Williams and
Bartley................................................... K
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on
November 20, 1991.
PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman;
Beverly Sherwood, Vice Chairman; Manual C. DeHaven, Stonewall District; John
Marker, Back Creek District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Marjorie H.
Copenhaver, Citizen at Large; Todd D. Shenk, Citizen at Large; Roger L.
Thomas, Citizen at Large; and Kenneth Y. Stiles, Board Liaison.
Planning Staff present were: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary; Kris C. Tierney,
Deputy Planning Director; W. Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator
ABSENT: Carl M. McDonald, Gainesboro District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mrs. Sherwood, the minutes
of October 16, 1991 were unanimously approved as presented.
BIMONTHLY REPORT
Chairman Golladay accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's
information.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
CIP Committee - 11/19/91 Mtn
Chairman Golladay said that the CIP met on November 19 with the School Board
to discuss capital improvement projects.
0a
Sanitation Authority - 11 / 11/91 Mtg.
Mrs. Copenhaver said that the Authority is encountering some problems over the
expansion of Parkins Mill to incorporate Stephens City.
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Preliminary Master Development Plan #005-91 of Henry Business Park for business uses
on 29.8642 acres in the Stonewall District_
Action - Approved
Mr. Kim Henry, the owner, said that the average density is 1.6 lots per acre with
an average lot size of 20,387 square feet. Mr. Henry said that he was proposing shared
entrances on Baker -Knight Street, due to the number of lots located there, and he will indicate
those entrances on the plan. Mr. Henry indicated that the northeast corner of the property would
be used for stormwater management.
Mr. Tierney said that staff recommendations were for approval, contingent upon
the applicant making the necessary additions listed in the staffs report, as well as addressing all
the review agencies' comments.
Mr. Thomas asked whether certain lots on the plan were buildable, particularly
due to the large amount of fill that would be needed. Mr. Thomas felt that a stormwater
management plan was needed. The staff responded that it was not a requirement for lots to be
indicated on a preliminary master development plan and there was no guarantee that the lots
shown would be approved during subdivision.
Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Wilson,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
approve Preliminary Master Development Plan #005-91 of Henry Business Park for business use
on 29.8642 acres contingent upon the applicant making the necessary additions listed in the staff
report to the plan, as well as addressing all review agency concerns. This property is located
at the intersection of Baker Lane and Fort Collier Road in the Stonewall District and is identified
as GPIN 57000OA000097F and 570000A000097L.
Discussion on the Development of a Methodology and a Computer Model for Frederick
County Which Measures the Impact of Rezonings on the Costs of Capital Facilities.
Action - Worksession Scheduled for 12/18/91
Mr. Watkins said that the firm of Hammer, Siler, George Associates had
completed the development of a methodology and computer model for Frederick County which
measured the impact of rezonings on the costs of capital facilities. Mr. Watkins said that it was
the opinion of the staff that the adopted policies in the Comprehensive Plan provided the County
with the latitude to deny rezonings if sufficient facilities were not provided to support
development or if were are demonstrated negative impacts on the costs of public facilities and
those impacts were not adequately addressed.
Mr. Watkins said that the computer model allows the staff to measure facility cost
impacts on the county budget for schools, parks and fire and rescue facilities by using units of
demand, which have been derived from various sources, including school children per dwelling,
fire calls per square feet of building, or residents per dwelling. Mr. Watkins said that the model
can then be used by the applicants as a basis for developing proffer packages.
Mr. Stiles raised a point concerning school costs. He said that if the model
considered one school age child per household, it should take into account that after a certain
number of school years, that child would leave a vacancy for another school-age child. Mr.
Stiles also felt that timing was critical with cash proffers. He felt that you could not force
developers to pay cash proffers up front when the timing of the development might be five to
ten years. He felt there were several other areas that needed to be studied; for example, he
thought the dollar figure projected by the model per household was too high.
The Planning Commission unanimously agreed to schedule the Planning
Commission's December 18th meeting as a worksession with the Board of Supervisors to discuss
the development impact model.
CANCELLATION OF THE JANUARY 1 1991 REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PLANNING COMMISSION
The Commission unanimously agreed to cancel their January 1, 1992 regular
meeting. The Commission agreed to hold a public hearing at their January 15, 1992 meeting.
AMENDMENTS TO THE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING ORDINANCE AS
THEY RELATE TO LAND DIVISION OUT IDE OF THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT
AREA
4
Action - Approved
Mr. Tierney stated that as a result of the Planning Commission's public hearing
on November 7, 1991, a number of revisions were sent to the Rural Issues Committee for
consideration. He said that the Rural Issues Committee met on November 12, 1991 and agreed
to all but one of the requested modifications. The one modification that was not agreed to was
the suggested reduction in the setback requirements for residential lots adjoining agricultural
operations. However, the provision requiring a fence at the perimeter of residential subdivisions
adjoining agricultural operations was eliminated.
Mr. Tierney stated that the change which resulted in the greatest amount of
deliberation was the inclusion of standard five -acre lot subdivisions as an option to the proposed
preservation lots with required 40% parcel. He said that after much discussion, this change was
reluctantly agreed to by a majority of the Committee members, provided that significantly
improved road standards also be applied to these subdivisions.
The staff noted the following changes made by the Subcommittee: 1) Section 4-4-
1, which would have reduced the density on certain parcels due to steep slopes or other
environmental areas making up the parcel was deleted; 2) The restriction on future subdivision
of the 40% parcel was lowered from 25 years to ten years and tied specifically to a rezoning of
the parcel; 3) The suggested reduction to setbacks from agricultural and orchard operations was
not reduced; 4) A number of changes were made to Section 4-7 to accommodate five -acre lot
subdivisions as an option and to require the same setbacks for these subdivisions as would be
required to two -acre lots; 5) Section 4--6-1 was altered to allow for the creation of five -acre lots
on any parcel as opposed to only those under 20 acres in size; 6) Section 4-7-1.5 requiring a
perimeter fence was removed; 7) Section 4-8, dealing with required lot frontage, was changed
to a required lot width at setback and was reduced by 200 feet for family divisions. A maximum
lot depth of four times the width was also added.
Staff also noted numerous changes that were made to Section 4-16, as follows:
1) Family divisions and agricultural lots would be permitted on shared private driveways and
would not count toward the three -lot limit allowed prior to the requirement for state -maintained
roads; 2) Curb and gutter and underground utilities were added to the list of items which would
not be required in rural subdivisions; 3) Language was added that would allow the Planning
Commission to permit the extension of private roads in situations where no other means of access
exists. These roads would have to be built to the same standards as state roads with the
exception of the surface treatment; 4) Five -acre divisions would have to be served by the
equivalent of a state -maintained road except for the surface treatment; 5) The minimum spacing
requirement for driveways was eliminated; and 6) The interval for topographic contours, required
by section 5-2-9 on sketch plans, was increased from five feet to ten feet.
Chairman Golladay called for public comment and the following people came
forward:
5
Mr. Fred Hasner, a developer in the western part of the county, felt that the five -
acre divisions should be an option to the two -acre, 40% parcel divisions; he was against the
requirement for state -standard roads for five -acre subdivisions --he felt that the cost of building
the road would make the lots unaffordable; and he felt that the 500' frontage was excessive for
any lot, especially in the rural areas. Mr. Harper said that he didn't think he could afford to
develop in Frederick County if he had to build state -standard roads for five -acre subdivisions.
Mr. David Nichols felt that the county had moved away from the goals originally
set by the Rural Issues Subcommittee in preserving the rural nature of the county. He felt that
what was best for Frederick County should be put first, not what was best for politics and
developers.
Ms. Barbara Thomas proposed that the 40% parcel be permanently set in easement
in order to protect the rural character of the county.
Several areas of concern were raised by the Commissioners. One of the major
concerns was the proposed requirement for roads to be built to state standards for five -acre lot
divisions. It was felt that if state roads were not required, there would not be the incentive to
cluster and create open space. Others felt that the cost for building such roads would be too
high. Another major area of discussion was the future division of the 40% parcel and opinions
ranged from either tying it to a rezoning or setting a time limit from ten to 25 years. The 500'
lot width was also deliberated.
Several Commissioners did not feel comfortable making changes to the proposal
without allowing the Subcommittee adequate time for further study. Overall, however, the
Commissioners felt that the proposed ordinance met the original intent to preserve open space
in Frederick County while at the same time, maintaining the rights of property owners.
A motion was made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr. DeHaven to table the
amendments and send them back to the Subcommittee for further study. This motion failed by
the following vote:
YE TO TABLE): Wilson,' DeHaven
N—(: Marker, Copenhaver, Sherwood, Golladay, Thomas, Shenk
Mr. Marker moved for the adoption of the Rural Areas Ordinance as proposed
with the changes recommended by the Subcommittee. This motion was seconded by Mrs.
Copenhaver.
Mr. Thomas proposed an amendment to the motion, that on Page 7, under
Paragraph 4-16-2.1, Access, the third sentence, "Those subdivisions containing lots described
by Sections 4-6-1, Traditional Lots, shall have roads constructed to state standards with the
exception of their surface treatment. " should be deleted. This was seconded by Mr. Marker and
approved by the following majority vote:
R
YES (TO APPROVE THE AMENDMENT): Shenk, Thomas, Wilson, Sherwood, Copenhaver,
Marker, Golladay
NO: DeHaven
No further amendments were presented.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby
recommend the adoption of the Rural Areas Land Use Regulations. The vote on the
ordinance adoption was as follows:
YES (APPROVE AS AMENDED): Thomas, Wilson, Sherwood, Copenhaver, Marker,
Golladay
NO: DeHaven
ABSTAIN: Shenk
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 9:30
p.m. by unanimous vote.
Respectfully submitted,
Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report
DATE: January 3, 1992
Fac. 9/12/89 (Opeq)
trmt.facil
Grace Brethren Church
(1) Rezonings Pending:
(dates are
submittal
dates)
9/05/90
(Ston)
Twin Lakes
4/04/90
(Shaw)
(RA to B2/RP)
Marshall Williams
3/12/91
(Shaw)
(RA to M2)
Zuckerman Co.
12/04/91
(Ston)
(Ml to M2)
(2) Rezonin s Approved: dates are BOS approval dates)
Alson & Margarite Smith 12/11/91 Ston B2 to RP
(3) Conditional Use Permits Pending: dates are submittal dates
None
(4) Conditional Use Permits Approved: dates are approval dates
Roger & Betty DeHaven 12/11/91 (Gain) Well Drilling
(cottage occupation)
Dick Ballenger 12/11/91 (Gain) Off Premise Sign
Robert Turben 12/11/91(Ston) Locksmith (cottage
occupation)
(5) Site Plans Pending: dates are submittal dates
Wheatlands Wastewater
Fac. 9/12/89 (Opeq)
trmt.facil
Grace Brethren Church
6/08/90
(Shaw)
church
Winc. Warehousing
9/05/90
(Ston)
warehouse
Flex Tech
10/25/90
(Ston)
Lgt. Industrial
Hampton Chase
12/18/90
(Ston)
S.F. & T.H.
Lake Centre
05/15/91
(Shaw)
Townhouses
Red Star Express Lines
05/24/91
(Ston)
Whse. Addition
Youth Development Ctr.
09/11/91
(Shaw)
Youth meeting
facilities
Valley Bible Church
11/25/91
(Opeq)
Church
Sherando Softball Complex 12/31/91 (Opeq)
Softball fields
Dr. Thomas Gromling
2
01/03/92 (Opeq) Medical Ofc.
Addition
(6) Site Plans Approved: (dates are approval_ dates}
None
(7) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
J.T.C. Ltd.
12/24/91
Shawnee
(8) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (P/C approval
dates
Abrams Point, Phase I
Frederick Woods
Hampton Chase
Lake Centre
Hershey Property
Fredericktowne Est.
(sections 5, 6 and 7)
Covenrty Courts
Senseny Glen
6/13/90 Shawnee
5/16/90 Opequon
02/27/91 Stonwall
06/19/91 Shawnee
10/02/91 Stonewall
10/16/91 Opequon
12/04/91 Shawnee
12/04/91 Shawnee
(9) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
Wakeland Manor (revised) 06/05/91 (Shaw)
Henry Business Park 10/22/91 (Ston)
(10) FMDPPending Administrative Approval: (dates are BOS approval
dates
Brookland Est. Abrams Pt. 6/13/90 Shaw
(11) FMDP Administ. Approved (dates are admin. approval dates)
Wheatlands
12/16/91 Opequon
(12) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pendinq:(submit. dates)
Mark Kneeland 12/27/91 BkCk 27' rear (house)
3
(13) BZA Applications Approved: (approval dates
Denis J. Doherty 12/17/91 Opeq
Paul Holly 12/17/91 Gain
Robert Russell 12/17/91 Shaw
(14) BZA Applications Denied:
None
4' 9" front
(dwelling)
5' side ( two car
garage)
1.2" side and
3.2' (porch)
(15) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER
None
I COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/678-0682
M E M O R A N D U M
To: Frederick County Planning Commission
From: Robert W. Watkins, Director X,Ljl
Subject: Planning Commission Subcommittees
Date: January 2, 1992
The staff would like to recommend some restructuring of Planning
Commission Subcommittees. We crossed some major hurdles in 1991
and may wish to somewhat simplify our approach. We would recommend
that the subcommittees be as follows:
Subcommittee
Comprehensive Plans0�_
and Programs
0 ,- 5 t4 d JI
Development Review and Regulations
v85
Purpose
Review comprehensive
plan, special planning
projects, capital
improvements plan, other.
ordinance revisions,
review development
proposals of large
impact, review
procedures, other.
In addition representatives would need to be sent to the following
bodies:
Winchester Planning Commission
Frederick County Sanitation Authority � w/; S '" 37
Frederick County Transportation Committee
Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board 3 ��vs
Winchester -Frederick County Economic Development Commission
Winchester -Frederick County Transportation Planning Committee
This reorganization may require some adjustments to our planning
process schedule. We will discuss these during the review of the
Comprehensive Plan. We may also want to think about ways to
improve public involvement in the work of the subcommittees. The
staff would propose that we continue with the existing
subcommittees until new members are appointed.
Please let me know if you have questions.
RWW/slk
THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS
9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
P/C Review Date: 1/15/92
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
J.I.C. LTD.
2 Lots
situated on
4.6674 Acres
LOCATION: At the intersection of Route 728 (Victory Lane) and
Route 1000
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 64000OA00008ON
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned M-1 (Light Industrial)
present use - Landscape and horticultural service
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned M-1 (Light
Industrial), present use - light industrial
PROPOSED USE: Light industrial uses
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter from
Robert Childress dated December 18, 1991.
Fire Marshal: .' Fire lanes required in accordance with
Frederick County Chapter 10. All fire related comments will
be addressed on site plan or construction drawings.
Inspections Department: Buildings shall comply with the
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and will comment on
Use Group at the time of structural plans review.
Sanitation Authority: 1st review - 1 item - correct and
resubmit
County En ineer: The engineering department has no comments
at this time.
6
Planninct & Zoninct: This property meets all of the ordinance
requirements for subdivision. Waiver of the master
development plan requirement is recommended. VDOT's request
that a dedicated drainage easement be established along the
western and southern boundaries of the property has been
accomplished (see Note 5 on plat). The recently constructed
Route 1000 is called "Industrial Park Access Road". This is
not an authorized name and the road must be correctly named
and the correct name indicated on the plat.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1/15/92 PC MTG.: Approval with the
condition that the review agency comments be addressed prior to
final plat approval.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
P. 0. BOX 278
RAY D. PETHTEL EDINBURG, 22824
COMMISSIONER
(703) 984-4133
December 18, 1991
Mr. Edward W. Dove,
C/O Dove and Associates
3078 Shawnee Drive
P. 0. Box 2033
Winchester, VA 22601
Dear Mr. Dove:
WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN
RESIDENT ENGINEER
Ref.: Bartlett Realty Company, Inc.
Lots # 6A and 6B
Route 728 and 1000
Frederick County
We have no objections to the above referenced subdivision. However, prior to
our approval of .the plat the adjacent Industrial Park Access Road should be
referred to as Route 1000. We would also suggest that a 20' drainage easement
along the western and southern property lines be dedicated, by deed., to
Frederick County to accanmodate present and future drainage concerns.
The owner should also be aware that prior to development of the lots, this
office will require a complete set of construction plans for review. Any
entrances will have to be constructed to VDOT minimum standards to allow for
safe egress and ingress of the property.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please let me know.
Sincerely,
William H. Bushman, P.E.
Transportation Resident Engineer
Q.� 11 a xo'/
By: Robert B. Childress
Hwy. Permits and Subdivision
Specialist Senior
RBC/sl
xc: Mr. R. W. Watkins
ATTN•: Mr. W. W. Miller
TRANSPORTATION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY
APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST
SUBDIVISION
FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA
Date: be(-, C1 , l�,-1 i Application #
Applicant/Agent:
DEC 241991
J t�
Fee Paid
G/yE G A;�C,G tATES
Address : 'P, o.
Phone: &(0-1 - I I G3
Owners name: �? -�-Et; + y C0 wi►.lY f �C
Address: (,C�.tuAc Sr, STP�rrrt7 . G �(�Gt G 1
Phone: (2,079137 -LJ —t,-7-77
Lease list names of all owners, principals and /or majority
stockholders:
Ed I'Deol
Contact Person:
Phone: 6 6 7-//O
Name of Subdivision:�U�gd d,c Lar G J 1' C T
SBD/ v�s� onr
Number of Lots Total Acreage X 66 7-Z
Property Location: e o F 7.28/oo/00c?`
(Give State Rt.#, distance and direction from intersection)
Magisterial District �,yAcdNC� -x ID ID Number (GPIN) y 4 gpN
-7-
Property zoning and present use: 4^0
/�06{T/CrJGT(/2�4 L SC2V/Cc-_-
Adjoining property zoning and use: M- ( 1-'161'� �DU�2fAL
Has a Master Development Plan been submitted for this project?
Yes No
If yes, has the final MDP been approved by the Board of
Supervisors?
Yes No
What was the MDP title?
Does the plat contain any changes from the approved MDP?
Yes No
If yes, specify what changes:
Minimum Lot Size (smallest lot) /. g33o ACRES
Number and types of housing units in this development:
Number
Types
70t-565-1140
1
I
E 236.30'
25' BRL
m
LOT 63
2.8.344 AC.
01
X x X X
n
R/ N
L " EX. FENCE 25' BRL
N 44 43"40 EI .368.72'
::--'
�21.OJ' ??fie' x o 25' BRL 1 I26
x
LOT 6A I EX
/ 1.8330 AC. x BUILD/NC m l l
�- I L
�o
_ 75' BRL
Z 20' PR/VA 7E x
UAUTY E-W'T I EX.
SERVING LOT 6B oei��
IxI
1� 2J.9.3' L x x x
S 44'70'13' W .353.90"
VICTORY LANE - VA. ROUTE 7.
50' R/W
1) NO 777LE REPORT FURNISHED.
2) TAX MAP NO. 64. ... A .... 8ON ; ZONE M-1.
3) TI-I/S PROPERTY IS L OCA TED IN FLOOD ZONE G'
AS SHOWN ON FI.R.M. MAP Z 510063 01158
DATED ✓UL Y 17, 1978.
4) LOT 6A & 68 TO BE SERViED BY PUBLIC UTILITIES
0WNER 'S CONSENT
W
v -
N
�o
r
h
s
U77LITY
LOT 68
EX -tty -bd'L
__11—tro l CIE
cui)'�Y,ECT.
GRAPHIC SCALE
too 0 so too
i �I
1' - 100'
TCA 301.565-3340
17/CINI TY MAP
(SCALE: 1" = 2000)
PLAT SHOWING
SUBDI WSION OF L O T 6
JI.0 LIM/TLD SUBDI KSION
DEED BOOK 538 PACE 708
DEED BOOK 672 PACE 299
DEED BOOK 760 PAGE 902
SI -/A WEE DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, 14RGINIA
DA TE- NOVEMBER 26, 1991 SCALE: 1- = 100'
APPROVED BY
FREDERICK COUNTY SANITA77ON AUTHORITY % 7" <. .�/i DATE Zj A�c 9/
VA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUR VE YOR'S
a. 5
:.
n 1
SUBDIVISION ADMINIS7RA TOR
�3t
� W chettlf �✓" � y
'` _J _
/1
0
TE -
72
—T
50
17/CINI TY MAP
(SCALE: 1" = 2000)
PLAT SHOWING
SUBDI WSION OF L O T 6
JI.0 LIM/TLD SUBDI KSION
DEED BOOK 538 PACE 708
DEED BOOK 672 PACE 299
DEED BOOK 760 PAGE 902
SI -/A WEE DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, 14RGINIA
DA TE- NOVEMBER 26, 1991 SCALE: 1- = 100'
APPROVED BY
FREDERICK COUNTY SANITA77ON AUTHORITY % 7" <. .�/i DATE Zj A�c 9/
VA. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION DATE
PLANNING COMMISSION
SUR VE YOR'S
DATE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
DATE"
SUBDIVISION ADMINIS7RA TOR
DA TE -
E-
"TH OF D
U
EDWARD W. DOVE 9
CERT. N0.
54-17-3(A);4
SURv�o�
SURI/EYOR'S CER TIF/CA TF
I, EDWARD W. DOVE, A DULY LICENSED SURVEYOR IN THE COMMONWEALTH OF
NRGIN/A, DO HEREBY CER77FY THAT I HAVE CAREFULLY SURVEYED THE PROPERTY
SHOWN ON 7HIS PLAT AND THAT IT IS CORRECT TO 77AE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF- THAT IT IS A SUBDIVISION OF THE PROPERTY ACQUIRED BY BARTLET
REAL TY CO. INC. FROM I VA RURH SUET7NER, ET WR BY DEED DA TED OCTOBER
2, 1982 AND RECORDED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
OF FREDERICK COUNTY IN DEED BOOK 552 AT PAGE 250.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 26th DAY OF NOVEMBER, 1991
EDWARD W DOVE
_ . PA lS- f !1F 2
TCA 301.565-3340
v N 4427'19- E_ 236. JO"
25' BRL
�I
ry �� LOT 68 N
28344 AC.
QJ
NILf�� fly 25'
N 444J'40' E x 368.72' N
2z$B r
21.03" p
25'SRL � �• µh
LOT 6A
1.8JJO C. I suiLDiNc m l l
L
-y 75' BRL � N
20' PRI ✓A 7E
i U77LITY ESM7. I IX f 20' PRIVA7F U77LJTY
SERWNC LOT 5B KU ESM'T SERVING LOT 68
23.93'L FORCE MAIN
COWNEC77ON MK
S 44 00'13" W Mi.. 90'
VICTORY LANE - VA. ROUTE 728
50' R/W
NO7ES:
1) NO 77 7Z-- REPORT FURNISHED.
2) TAX MAP NO. 64. ... A .... 80N ; ZONE M-1.
J) THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN FLOOD ZONE C'
AS SHOWN ON F.I.R.M. MAP / 510063 01158
DATED ✓UL Y 17 1978-
4)
9784) LOT 6A & 6B TO BE SERVED BY PUBLIC U77LI77ES.
5) THERE IS A 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG RT. 1000
AND RT. 728 RIGHT—OF—WA Y LINES.
OWNER "S CONSENT
OFAPN/C SCALE
ICU o as 100
1' a loo'
WE; 7HE UNDERSIGNED OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN
THE SURVEYORS CET 77F7CATE DO HEREBY CER77FY THAT THIS SUBDMSION IS MADE IN
ACCORDANCE MTH OUR FULL DESIRES AND CONSENT.
'ME BARTLEM' RFJ1L'1'Y CXLM2Z:
NVY , I NCOk2 1ORNFED
DA TF
BDecember 12, 1991
Frederick 1.9. Tobin, Its Secretary DA 7F o,
P/C Review Date: 1/15/92
SITE PLAN ,#025-91
SHERANDO PARR SOFTBALL COMPLEX
LOCATION: Route 277 East, across from Sherando Park, Stephens City
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 86A0000000143C
PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas), present use
vacant
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) and RP
(Residential Performance), present use - residential, campground,
convenience store, and agricultural
PROPOSED USE: Softball fields
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Engineering Department- Our previous comments related to site
drainage have been adequately addressed in this final
submittal.
Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building code and shall comment on
building Use Group at the time of structural plans review.
Codes that apply for design are the BOCA National Building
Code/1990 and the 1986 ANSI A117 Standard for Physically
Handicapped People.
Parks and Recreation: No comment.
Sanitation Authority: Approved September 12, 1991.
Planning and Zoning_ The proposed Sherando Park Softball
Complex will be a shared facility with the new Sherando High
School, Staff concerns involve stormwater drainage and
lighting associated with this facility. Revisions to the
drainage system have been verified by the County Engineer and
representatives from the Frederick County Parks and Recreation
2
Department will be present to discuss proposed lighting for
this facility.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1/15/92 PC MEETING: Approval, once all
review agencies provide staff with final site plan approval.
SITE PLAN APPLICATION✓
Complete the following application:
DATE 12/5/91 APPLICATION # oa.5- 9/
I. Development
Sherando Park Softball Complex
2. Location of Property:
Sherando Park
(by street name)
Rt. 277 East
Stephens City, VA 22655
3. Property Owner:
Frpdezirk
County Parks and Recreation Department
Address:
9 Court Square, P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601
Telephone:
(703) 665-5678
4. Applicant/Agent:
Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department
Address:
9 Court Square, P.O.Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601
Telephone:
(703) 665-5678
5. Designer:
G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc.
Address:
200 N. Cameron St.
Winchester, VA 22601
Telephone:
(703) 667-2139
Contact:
Ron Mislowsk Jr.
Qan original or
revised Site Plan?
original x Revised
DEC 3 11991-s-
7. Total area of parcel to be developed: 23.04 acres
S. Property Information:
a) Property ID m:
b) Current Zoning:
c) Present Use:
d) Proposed Use:
e) Adjoining Property Zoning:
f) Adjoining Property Use:
g) Magisterial District:
Tax map 86A, Parcel 143C
R.A.
Recreation
Recreation
R. A. & R. P.
Residential/Commercial
Opequon
I have read the material included in this package and understand
what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I
also understand that all required material will be complete prior
to the submission ofd sitep:�an.
signature:
Date: /A 3�
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Parks and Recreation Department
,Tames M. Doran, Director
703/665-5678 - FAX: 703/667-0370
MEMORANDUM
TO: Evan Wyatt, Planner II
FROM: Matthew Hott, Superintendent of ParksAg
SUBJ: Sherando Park Softball Complex Site Plan Application
DATE: December 31, 1991
Please find attached the site plan application for the development of a softball
complex at Sherando Park, Stephens City, VA.
All appropriate agency reviews have been received with the exception of the
Virginia Department of Transportation (V.D.O.T). I would anticipate receiving
their review anytime.
The Parks and Recreation Department has applied for a grant (Recreational Access
Funding) to the Virginia Department of Transportation to fund the construction of
the access road to the complex. Consequently, the Virginia Department of
Transportation has had an opportunity to review the site plan during the design
phase of the project and the engineer has been working with V.D.O.T. on the roadway
design.
Due to the need to have this facility completed by the beginning of the school year
1993, I would like to have the site plan reviewed by the Planning and Development
staff and included on the -next Planning Commission agenda.
If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact me
at 665-5675 at your convenience.
lgb
Attachment
9 Court Souare - P 0 'Roo 601 _ W;noherter Vire, r ;a 114n I
P/C review date: 1/15/92
REZONING APPLICATION #010-91
ZUCKERMAN CO., INC (Scrap Iron)
To Rezone 24 Acres
From M-1 (Light Industrial)
To M-2 (General Industrial)
LOCATION: On the south side of State Route 663 north of
Winchester, between Rt. 11 the Penn. Railroad.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 44000OA0000120
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned M-1 (Light Industrial), land
use - scrap metal and materials handling, recycling center
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: The 37.45 acre site
adjoins RA, Rural Areas; M-2, General Industrial; and RP,
Residential Performance zoning; with Agricultural, Residential,
Industrial and a church as adjoining land uses.
PROPOSED USE: Expand existing facility.
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Debartment of Transportation• No objection to
rezoning of this property. Before development this
office will require a complete set of construction plans
detailing entrance designs, drainage features and traffic
flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, 4th
Edition, for review. Any work performed on the State's
right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit.
This permit is issued by this office and requires an
inspection fee and surety bond coverage. If possible the
proposed access road into the property from Rt. 11 should
be shifted slightly to the north to align with existing
State Route 837. Also, any Rt. 11 entrance improvements
may necessitate adjustment/ lengthening of our adjacent
drainage structure (box culvert).
Health Department• The Health Department has no objection to
the proposal provided: 1. No increase in usage occurs. 2. A
0A
satisfactory inspection of existing system has been made by
the Health Department.
Fire Marshal: Fire lanes will be required in accordance with
Frederick County Chapter 10 and the BOCA Building Code for any
new structures. 1) Hydrant locations shown are adequate for
new industrial area; however, additional hydrants may be
required as each site is developed. This will be addressed on
site plans. 2) Provide temporary street signs when
construction begins. 3) Burning of land clearing debris
requires a permit form Fire Marshal's Office. 4) Burning of
construction debris is not permitted. 5) Burning
construction, access for emergency vehicles must be maintained
at all times. 6) Comments from Clear Brook VFD are to be
included with this review.
Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Co.: The Clearbrook Fire and Rescue
Company would request that Zuckerman Company, Inc. proffer
0.05 per sq. ft. of future floor space for a minimum of
$500.00 annually. See attached letter from Zuckerman Co.,
Inc. dated December 24, 1991.
Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and shall comment on
Use Group at the time of Building Structural Plans review.
Frederick Co. Engineer: Issues related to traffic intensities
and stormwater management will be addressed at the time of
site plan submittal. There are no other comments at this
time.
Sanitation Authority: Water service is available. Sewer
service is not available. Nearest sewer is 1 1/2 miles away
at the Stonewall Industrial Park. There is adequate water
supply available.
Planning & Zoning: The property involved is presently
used for Zuckerman's scrap metal business. The scrap
metal business would be classified as a junkyard by our
ordinance. A portion of the operation also involves
recycling. Neither of these uses is permitted in the M-1
zoning district. The operation has been in existence for
a number of years and is considered to be a legally
nonconforming, or "grandfathered", use. The request to
rezone 24 acres of the 37.45 acre site to M-2 would bring
the operation into conformance with the present zoning
regulations as junkyards and recycling are permitted in
the M-2 zone.
Site Suitability - The site is located within the Urban
Development Area and is served with water. The site is
3
not served by central sewer and presently utilizes a
drainfield for sewage disposal. The 24 acre portion of
the site contained within the rezoning request would be
surrounded entirely by M-1 and M-2 zoning.
Potential Impacts - The rezoning would essentially allow
an unlimited expansion of the existing uses present on
the site. There are also a number of manufacturing
operations allowed in the M-2 zone which are not allowed
in the M-1 zone.
The southern portion of the site to be rezoned contains a
spring. The staff questions whether some precautions should be
taken to protect the area around the spring from future
expansions of uses which may be detrimental to the quality of
water flowing from the spring.
conclusion - As the area to be rezoned would be
surrounded by similar industrial zoning, and the site is
presently utilized for uses permitted in the requested
zoning category, it is the opinion of the staff that
there would not be significant adverse impacts from the
requested zoning change.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1/15/92 P/C MEETING• Approval
Zuckerman TvmpanV, 4Itr..
SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS
Route 11 North
P.O. Box 3275
if♦6 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (703) 667-6000
December 24, 1991
Clearbrook Volunteer Fire Co., Inc.
P. 0. Box 56
Clearbrook, VA 22624
ATTN: Mr. Thomas F. Price, Chief
Dear Mr. Price,
We Zuckerman Company, Inc., proffer 5� per square foot of
future floor space for a minimum of $500.00 annually if and when
rezoning is approved.
Sincerely,
ZUCKERMAN COMPANY, INC.
Richard Williams
President
RW:cch
C�Gov�
DEG 13 01991
AMENDMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY ZONING ORDINANCE
Approvals:
Planning Commission_January 15, 1992
Board of Supervis
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
THE ZONING DISTRICT MAP
#010-91 of ZUCKERMAN COMPANY, INC.
WHEREAS, Rezoning application #010-91 of Zuckerman Co., Inc., to
rezone 24 acres from M-1 (Light Industrial) to M-2 (General
Industrial) located north of Winchester on the west side of Route
11, in the Stonewall District, and designated by GPIN
440000A0000120.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this
application on January 15, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this
application on , 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds this
rezoning to be in the best interest of the public health, safety,
welfare, convenience.and good zoning practice;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors as follows:
That Chapter 21 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning Ordinance, is
amended to revise the Zoning District Map to change 24 acres from
M-1 (Light Industrial) to M-2 (General Industrial) located north of
Winchester on the west side of Route 11 in the Stonewall District,
and designated by GPIN 440000A0000120.
This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage.
Passed this day of , 1992.
A Copy Teste
John R. Riley, Jr.
Frederick County Administrator
REZONING APPLICATION FORM
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
To be completed by Planning Staff:
Zoning Amendment Number
Submittal Deadline
PC Hearing Date
Date Received
Application Date
BOS Hearing Date
The following information shall be provided by the applicant:
All parcel numbers, tax map numbers, deed book pages and numbers
may be obtained from the Office of the Commissioner of Revenue, 9
Court Square., Winchester.
1. Applicant:
Name: Zuckerman Co., Inc
Address: Box 3275
Winchester Va 22601
Telephone: (703) 667-6000
2. Owner:
Name: Zuckerman Co., Inc.
Address: Box 3275
Winchester, Va 22601
Telephone: X03) 667-6000
In addition, the Code of Virginia allows us to request full dis-
closure of ownership in relation to rezoning applications. Please
list below all owners or_parties in interest of the land to be re-
zoned:
Joseph Zuckerman
Louise Zuckerman (Wife)
Eden Zuckerman (Daughter)
Richard Williams
3. Zoning Change: It is requested that the zoning of the property
be changed from M-1 to M-2. (A portion of this parcel will remain
MM -1)
4. Location: The property is located at (give exact directions):
West side of Rte. 11, north of Winchester. South side of State
Rte. 663 and east _side_of Penn. Railroad. (Note:- This Application
is beina submitted by the Zuckerman Company, Inc. (Scrap Iron).
Not to be confused with Zuckerman, Chas. & Son, Inc., a steel
fabrication business__ad-iacent to this _property
5. Parcel Identification:
21 Digit Tax Parcel Number: 44000-A00-0000-0000-00120
6. Magisterial District: Stonewall
7. Property Dimensions: The dimensions of the property to be
rezoned.
Total Area: 37.45 Acres
The area of each portion to be rezoned to a different zoning
district category should be noted:
24.00' Acres Rezoned to M-2 ,
13.45 Acres to remain M-1 (Unchanged)
Frontage: 530 ± Feet
Dept: 1528± Feet
8. Deed Reference: The ownership of the property is referenced
by the following deed:
Conveyed from: Dorothy G. Allen
Deed Page: 699
Deed Book Number: 310
9. Proposed Use: It is proposed that the property will be put to
the following uses.
The property is currently being used as a scrap metal and
materials handling recycling center. The existing facility is
to be expanded to meet area demands for recycling of all
materials. �'-
10.Checklist: Check the following items that have been included
with this application.
Location map
Survey or plat
Deed to property
Statement verifying taxes
Sign receipt
Agency'Comments
Fees
Impact Analysis Statement
Proffer Statement
11.Signature:
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby mak application and
petition the governing body to amend the zoning ordinance and
to change the zoning map of Frederick County,'Virginia and do
hereby certify that the application and accompanying materials
are true and accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge.
Applicant:
XOwner: �
12. Re resentati n•
If the application is being represented by someone other than
the owner or application and if questions about the application
and if questions about the application should be directed.to
that representative, please list,. the following.
Representative's Name: Charles E. Maddox Jr. - P.E.
Representative's Phone Number: _(703)667-2139
Owners of the Property adjoining the land will be notified of the public
hearing. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any
property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any prop-
erty directly across the road from the requested property. The applicant
is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property
including the 21 -digit tax parcel identification number which may be ob-
tained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue.
Name: Zuckerman Co. Inc.
Address: Box 3275 Winchester,, Va_ 22601
Property I.D.#: 44-A-12
Name: C & S Steel Fabricatincr, Inc.
Address: Box 2037 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 44 -A -12A
Name: Whitlock, Rebecca A.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 653 Winchester, Va 22601
Property T.D.#: 44-A-17
Name: Wesleyan Methodist
c/o Rev. George Fraley
Address: Rt_. 5,Box 418_. Winchester, Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 44-A-18
Name: Lewis, Max W. & Lois S.
Address: Rt. 8,Bcx 648 Winchester, Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 44-A-20
Name: WJohnson, Arthur E. & Patricia A.
Address: P.O. Box 1659 Winchester, Va -22601
Property I.D.#: 44-A-21
Name: -- Gray, Mabel Virginia M.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 643 Winchester, Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 44-A-22
44-A-23
Name: Valley Fertilizer
Address: Mt. Jackson, Va 22842
Property I.D.#: 44-A-6
Name: Carroll, Carole D
Address: P. O. Box 164 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 44-A-19
Name: Buckley -Laces Inc
Address: P.O. Box 3231 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-83
43-A-84
43-A-85
Name: Duncan, Emma S.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 698 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-99
Name: DeHaven, Charles Stuart
Address: Rt. 8,Box 690 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-112
43 -A -112A
43 -A -112B
Name: Muia, Goldie L.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 628 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-115
Name: Griffith, Keith A. & Carol M
Address: Rt. 8,Box 688 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-116
Name: Tharp, Roland Lee Jr.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 685 Winchester Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-118
Name: Grafton School, Inc.
Address: P.O. Box 112 Berryville, Va 22611
Property I.D.#: 43-A-119
Name: Dietz, Charles E. & Juanita E.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 645 Winchester, Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-120
Name: Mason, William
Address: Rt. 8,Box 640 Winchester, Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-121
Name: Hostetler, William C.
Address: Rt. 8,Box 638 Winchester, Va 22601
Property I.D.#: 43-A-122
Environmental & Planning Impacts
for
Zuckerman Property
U.S. Route 11 North
October 1991
Introduction
The firm of Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. has been commissioned to
evaluate the above referenced project in light of several major planning issues, as
outlined and required by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors. This document is
prepared in support of and in preparation to rezone 24 acres from present light
industrial district (M-1) to intensive industrial district (M-2).
The current use is a salvage and recycling center. The owner intends to expands
this use in order to upgrade the sorting and separating operations.
1) Traffic Impacts
This development will not have a significant impact on traffic patterns in the
area. The County currently uses the existing facility to handle the recycling needs of
the County and intends to continue this agreement_ This rezoning action would not
increase the trips per day immediately. If, however, the leveling of recycling
increases, so too then would the trips to this site. It is difficult to estimate the future
trips per day, but if the 24 acres were fully developed to a 33% FAR the trips per day
would equal 520 under a typical M-2 use.
2. Sewage Conveyance and Treatment Impacts.-
It
m acts:
It is not anticipated that the number of employees would increase by this
action. The flows from the site are currently treated by on site sewage disposal. We
would intend the present system to remain in use.. We estimate the sewer flows at 400
gpd_
If central sewer facilities were extended to this area, hook up should be
required If the site were fully developed by a dry industry the sewage flows could
approach 7500 gpd. (250 employees 9 30 gal/day/employee).
3. Water Supply Impacts:
A 10" watermain exists along the east side of U.S. Route 11, and an 8" line runs
along VA Route 837 to the site. As with sewer, the water usage is not expected to
increase If the site were fully developed, we estimate the usage at 7500 gpd. Fire
protection is adequately provided by the existing system.
4. Utility Planning (General)
The site lies within the County water and sewer services area as described in
the comprehensive plan. If the County Sanitation Authority extends central sewer to
the area, the entire parcel could be fully developed. The owner is interested in
centralized sewer and is investigating the cost effectiveness of such improvements.
5. Education Cost
This project will generate no school children and therefore have no effect on
educational cost in Frederick County.
6. Parks and Recreation Cost:
This project would result in no impact on Parks and Recreation budget.
7. Drainage Facility Impacts:
A development of heavy industrial in lieu of light industrial will have very
little affect on the quantity of run off as it exists now. The quality of the runoff could
degrade. It is recommended that suitable green space be provided to help filter run
off from the site.
The site is at the lower end of a large Fhatt's Run watershed, if it were fully
developed, the impact of the proposed run off on Hiatt's Run would have to be closely
evaluated and detention provided if necessary. Such would logically be addressed at
the time of site plan approval.
8. Emergency Services Cost:
Sheriff protection is already provided to this facility and continued routine
patrols of the area should suffice for the foreseeable future. Additional patrols may
be necessary with a larger more varied development, but would also be required if
fully development under the present M-1 zoning. No impacts over and above those
existing in the present zoning are identified.
9. Solid Waste Cost:
Solid waste will be exported by contract hauler at no cost to the Frederick
County Landfill. The present landfill has 12 months available life at current rates of
waste delivery. The new addition, which is involved with permit issuance at this
writing, will expand capacity to at least 20 years.
As the proposed expansion will improve the amount of Frederick County's
waste which is recycled, a cost savings, and extended landfill lifespan are expected as
the result of this rezoning.
10. Environmental Impacts•
There will be certain minor negative impacts due to the heavy industrial
activity including noise and traffic movements. These are to be minimized by proper
compliance with local and state laws for environmental protection. A minor decrease
in run off quality is probable from this development. The effects on the down stream
properties should be minimal and in accordance with local and state regulations.
Appropriate development standards and practices can mitigate the impacted effects
on the environment.
There is no known loss of irretrievable resources involved with this project.
There are no known endangered species of fauna, flora or wildlife which will be
effected by this project. Ground water and air quality should be unaffected. A minor
impact of a negative nature is associated with lighting for security and business use.
These should be closely controlled during site planning to minimize the adverse
impacts on any residential structures and impacts on the traveling public.
11. Fiscal Impacts:
Mentioned above is the positive impact on the County financial picture. This
project will allow Frederick County to pursue a major recycling effort, and allow the
county to maximize available landfill space while offering the potential for new jobs,
when sewer is available.
12. Historic Impacts:
This project will not involve the loss of historic resources based on a site
walkover, a review of literature and with knowledge of studies and evaluations from
adjacent areas of the county.
Ronald A. Mislowsky, P.E.
G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc.
Cc -in ci 11 f4ncr 'Rnc-sv,Qn,
L i
it `�1' + f ` _ '• '_ -.� \ \ _ �\\ / ���_. � e..,
OD
+_ '1..,- I . sem.. _- xA•'L _ r '��, � a, ��\
�/ • 1 : /�.y e. . a
ftA
IZA
1-7
•� • if j l 1, I /' � L
a RA
• J v/i.�/ h fin\ �• ,+f�i• \ _` y '�• r.,x
fP Gtr OF ' "'4[t� d L/�• y - r' MtF-� l .�
Irf � Y '• �' Yet _ ^ pI � x_
ti.
Rp-
of / •�_•' � ^ , r .., v �c - .r+ � �i ' m, fl � ./ r `' i �
I
STATE ROUTE 669__-
/r� 55°38'00"E I
NOTE:
1. 24.00 AC. TRACT IS A PORTION OF
PARCEL/ttY TAX f AM 43 MUNCH HAS
A TOTAL ACfi�A[iE'OF 37.45 ACRES
AND IS RE00F7 N DEW BOOK 310
PA039 6e QFTNXCLEWSOF
7F C XdGfi�fVA+I�K OF FREDERICK
2 TI{18 PIAT SNAG PREPAID FROM
PIAlgOFi�90 VFONDN7HE
CFKXAT COIAIf;W iiia( couNTY,
VIR(Mlll NO RED SL*WY IS OAPL®_
PROPOSED REZONING PLAT
SHOWING 24.00 AC.
standing in the name of
ZUCKERMAN COMPANY, INC.
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
AUGUST 7, 1991
SCALE:1 "= 300'
gilbert w. cliffor associates, inc.
t{njtmnn . land pk—
We oW u�r. wf.. foo i+v.1 Oa.. n.
03 0-40, 530.40'
I
o
I
of
^I
I SHOBE
:I
I
Z
I GRANTHAM
o
O
z
f GRANTHAM
I
I I
tD
a
�
WHITACRE
a
h
24.00 AC.
�y
J
Lu
Io
f
REZONE FROM M-1
F"'
Fw
Q
+
W
TO M-2
+
`�
�
( J
I
J
OJ g'
o
O Z
U
UI
�_
I
S50°011100•E
- 770.1
3
<n to
y/oo
rn I v
N ut
N40°
1
°O �•
�
13.45 AC.
ZONING TO
N48°00'00"W-•438.0'
ss� 50.
/ REMAIN M-1
CARROL
J�
v
h
DIETZ I
N49°43'00'W - 1100.40'
I GRAFTON
SCHOOL I
DEHAVFJ•1
NOTE:
1. 24.00 AC. TRACT IS A PORTION OF
PARCEL/ttY TAX f AM 43 MUNCH HAS
A TOTAL ACfi�A[iE'OF 37.45 ACRES
AND IS RE00F7 N DEW BOOK 310
PA039 6e QFTNXCLEWSOF
7F C XdGfi�fVA+I�K OF FREDERICK
2 TI{18 PIAT SNAG PREPAID FROM
PIAlgOFi�90 VFONDN7HE
CFKXAT COIAIf;W iiia( couNTY,
VIR(Mlll NO RED SL*WY IS OAPL®_
PROPOSED REZONING PLAT
SHOWING 24.00 AC.
standing in the name of
ZUCKERMAN COMPANY, INC.
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
AUGUST 7, 1991
SCALE:1 "= 300'
gilbert w. cliffor associates, inc.
t{njtmnn . land pk—
We oW u�r. wf.. foo i+v.1 Oa.. n.
` COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/678-0682
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Planning Commission Members
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Planning Directort/
SUBJECT: Resolutions of Appreciation i�
DATE: January 6, 1992
Resolutions .of appreciation will be presented to the following,
outgoing Planning Commission members: Mr. Kenneth Stiles, Mrs
Beverly Sherwood, Mr. Carl McDonald and Mr. Manual DeHaven. We
would recommend that these resolutions be adopted.
RWW/slk
THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS
9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/678-0682
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Planning Director R0411
SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #008-91 of Williams/Bartley
DATE: January 2, 1992
Attached for your information is a letter from Richard Williams,
President of Zuckerman Co., Inc. instructing us to withdraw the
Williams/Bartley rezoning application (#008-91). This application
was tabled for sixty days at your November 6, 1991 meeting.
RWW/slk
THE COURTHOUSE COMMONS
9 N. Loudoun Street - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22601
zuthrrmalt Tamyanv, :41nr.
SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS
Route 11 North
P.O. Box 3275
��E• Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone (703) 667-6000
December 23, 1991
Mr. Robert W. Watkins
Planning Director
Department of Planning and Development
County of Frederick
P.O. Box 601
Winchester, Virginia 22601
RE: Rezoning Application #008-91
Dear Mr. Watkins,
Our application for rezoning.having been tabled at the
November 6, 1991 meeting, we have now decided not to
pursue the rezoning at this time. Please withdraw our
application.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
RW: j hg
Sincerely,
ZUCKERMAN ENTERPRISES, INC.
r /
Richard Williams
President
DEC
2 6199E '; ;'