Loading...
PC 05-05-93 Meeting AgendaFILE COPY AGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia MAY 5, 1993 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Meeting Minutes of March 17, 1993 .............................. A 2) Bimonthly Report...........................................B 3) Committee Reports..................................a..... C 4) Citizen Comments .......................................... D 5) Master Development Plan #002-93 of Franklin Mobile Home Park for a mobile home park. This property is located east of the Route 7 and I-81 Interchange, in the Stonewall District. (Mr. Wyatt)................................................E PUBLIC HEARINGS 6) Conditional Use Permit #005-93 of Paul C. StM for a cottage occupation - small engine and lawn mower repair. This property is Iocated on Route 664, in the Stonewall District. (Mr. Miller) ........... o .......... F VSO 3JIJ -2- 7) An ordinance to amend Chapter 165, Zoning Ordinance, Article X, Business & Industrial District, to allow truck or fleet maintenance facilities in master planned industrial parks zoned M-1 (Light Industrial District), and Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, to create performance standards for fleet or maintenance facilities located in master planned industrial parks zoned M-1 (Light Industrial District). (Mr. Wyatt) ............................................... G MISCELLANEOUS 8) Resolution regarding Corridor H. (Mr. Wyatt) ............................................... H 9) Other (no attachment) MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on March 17, 1993. PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman; John R. Marker, Vice Chairman/Back Creek District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; Todd D. Shenk, Gainesboro District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Manuel C. DeHaven, Stonewall District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; and John H. Light, Stonewall District. ABSENT: Ronald W. Carper, Gainesboro District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; and Beverly Sherwood, Board Liaison. Planning Staff present were: Robert W. Miller, Zoning Administrator; Evan A. Deputy Planning Director. CALL TO ORDER MINUTES Watkins, Secretary/Director; W. Wayne Wyatt, Planner II; and Kris C. Tierney, Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. The first order of business was the consideration of the minutes of February 3, 1993. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Marker, the minutes of February 3, 1993 were unanimously approved as presented. BIMONTHLY REPORT Chairman Golladay accepted the bimonthly report for the Commission's information. 2 Allied Wood Products Site Plan - Request for Administative Approval Mr. Wyatt said that staff is currently reviewing a site plan for Allied Wood Products for replacement of a building that burned down last year. Mr. Wyatt said that submittal of the plan missed the Bimonthly Report due to comments not being ready by the review agencies. Mr. Wyatt requested that the staff be allowed to proceed with administrative approval, since Mr. Cutshaw, the owner, wanted to begin as soon as the weather permitted. Upon motion made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Marker, the Commission unanimously agreed that the staff be allowed to proceed with administrative approval of the site plan. COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs SubcQmmittee(CP&PS) 3/8/93 Mtg. Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the CP&PS discussed industrial zoning along the rail corridor and ideas on developing tourism along the railways. Sanitation Authority - 3/17/93 Mtg Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the Sanitation Authority awarded the contracts for the Lakeridge and Greenwood water connector lines. She also reported on various other water construction project bids and construction. Development Review & Regulations Subcommitt a (DR&RS) - 3/11/93 Mr. Thomas reported that the DR&RS discussed a request by an individual business to allow facilities in M1 areas that are normally allowed only as an ancillary use to an individual business. The request would allow the use by right in M1 areas as long as the use is ancillary to the majority of businesses located within the park. Mr. Thomas reported that the subcommittee also reviewed various applications for membership to the DR&RS. 3 Economic Development Commission (EDC) Mr. Romine reported that the offices of the Economic Development Commission have moved to 45 East Boscawen Street in Winchester, Virginia. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE PROPOSED REDESIGN OF FREDERICK WOODS SUBDIVISION Mr. Tierney said that this request relates to the proposed realignment of Route 642 from just west of its intersection with Route 647 through to Route 522. He said that the realignment of Route 642 will cut into the northeastern comer of the approved Frederick Woods subdivision and the current owners are requesting approval of a slight revision to the approved plat. The purpose of the redesign was to minimize the loss of lots within the development while still enabling the proposed realignment of Route 642. Mr. Tierney said that the cul-de-sac serving the original lots 12-16 would be eliminated and redesigned lots 12, 13, and 14 would replace the cul-de-sac and the original five lots fronting it. He said that the staff is suggesting that if the Commission has no major concerns over this proposal, that they be allowed to administratively approve the redivision once plats have been prepared and relevant agencies have approved the redesign. Mr. Thomas was concerned about the amount of wooded area that had been removed by the developer. Mr. Thomas said he would be surprised if 25 % of the wooded area was left remaining. He was also concerned that the road efficiency buffer, shown on the staff's drawing, was significantly encroaching on two of the lots (Lots 12 & 13). Staff noted that the tree removal issue was being sent to the DR&RS. Staff also noted that the developer had stated that it would be their desire to put in the full screen and reduce the buffer. In any case, the road efficiency buffer requirements would have to be met. Mr. Light asked whether it was possible for the developer to get the necessary frontage for three lots into this area. Mr. Tierney said that they are really not that far short of what they need because the width of the lot increases quickly, however, they will need to widen Lot 12 somewhat. Lots 11 and 13 have much more area than needed, so a little can be taken from each of those lots to meet the requirement on Lot 12. It was the consensus of the Commission that the new design was an improvement over the original plat. It was noted that with the road efficiency buffer and open space on the original plat, the applicant had trouble placing houses and eventually came back with smaller homes. The Commissioners agreed to allow the staff to administratively approve the redivision once plats had been prepared and relevant agencies had approved the design. 4 1993-1994 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT WORK PROGRAM Mr. Watkins presented the 1993-1994 Work Program for the Department of Planning and Development. Chairman Golladay commented favorably on the transportation planning work being done jointly with the City and regionally with the Lord Fairfax Planning District. He felt it was very beneficial for the City and County to work together, especially when the time comes to seek funding for projects that are beneficial to both jurisdictions. Chairman Golladay felt that our region was head and shoulders above the metropolitan area because they have lacked transportation planning for many years. He said that our region is just beginning to grow and we have a very comprehensive transportation planning activity going on. Mr. Barnett, the City Liaison, spoke favorably regarding the County's development of a GIS. Mr. Barnett said that several City representatives have been advocating this for the City. Mr. Barnett felt that if the City and County worked together and decided on mutually agreeable software, the City may be able to contribute funds towards its purchase. He felt that information from both the City and County was needed to make the program a success. The Commissioners were in favor of the work program presented by the staff and felt it was a comprehensive effort for the Planning Commission and staff. Discussion Regarding the Intermodal Surface Trans=nortation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) Mr. Evan Wyatt said that the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has directed all state transportation departments to adopt regulations for transportation system enhancements. The state enhancement programs are one component of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). Mr. Wyatt said that ISTEA has several funding categories and programs that are authorized over a six year period. The Surface Transportation Program (STP) provides $457.5 million dollars for primary, secondary and mass transit projects in urban and rural areas. He said that ISTEA requires states to set aside at least ten percent of their share of STP funds for enhancements. Mr. Wyatt next presented a 10 -minute videotape entitled, "ISTEA: Shifting Gears," to provide the Commission with an explanation of what was involved in the ISTEA Enhancement Program and how the program will assist municipalities. Mr. Wyatt said that the Enhancement Program will have a direct impact on the Planning Commission in that specific projects will be reviewed by the Commission and recommended to the Board of Supervisors. 5 Commissioners felt that with all the groups involved in the project, a coordinated effort and good communication was vital so that good ideas were not lost. They felt that the first award would probably go to the most imaginative scheme, one that might have social or environmental impacts, and the more people that could be tapped for ideas, the better. ADJOURNMENT P.m.. No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 8:15 Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Watkins, Secretary James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report DATE: April 21, 1993 (1) Rezonin s Pending: (dates are submittal dates) 6/08/90 Shaw Church Flex Tech Twin Lakes 4/04/90 (Shaw) (RA to B2/RP) (2) Rezonings Approved: (dates are BOS meeting dates) 05/15/91 Shaw Townhouses None 05/24/91 Ston Whse. Addition (3) Rezonin s Denied: dates are BOS meeting dates Salvation Army 12/03/92 Ston None (4) Conditional Use Permits Pendia dates are submittal dates Ryland Homes 01/14/93 Opeq Off Premise Sign Joseph Smith 03/11/93 Ston Adult Care Home Charles & Bettye 03/17/93 BC Cottage Occupation-- Violette Audio/Video Studio Paul C. Stacy 03/26/93 Ston Eng. & Lawn Mower Rep. (5) Conditional Use Permits Approved: dates are aporoval dates None (6) Site Plans Pending: dates are submittal dates Wheatlands Wastewater Fac. 9/12/89 Opeq Trmt.facil Grace Brethren Church 6/08/90 Shaw Church Flex Tech 10/25/90 Ston Lgt. Industrial Hampton Chase 12/18/90 Ston S.F. & T.H. Lake Centre 05/15/91 Shaw Townhouses Red Star Express Lines 05/24/91 Ston Whse. Addition Freeton 04/27/92 Opeq Townhouses Salvation Army 12/03/92 Ston Ofc/Housing Glaize Components Fleet Maintenance FCSA Water Tank White Properties 2 01/21/93 Shaw 03/23/93 Ston 03/31/93 Shaw 04/22/93 Opeq Mfg. Plant Garage Hydro Pillar Storage Bldgs. (7) Site Plans Approved: dates are approval dates Blue Ridge Indus. 04/09/93 Shaw Industrial (8) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates) None (9) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (P/C approval dates Abrams Point, Phase I 6/13/90 Shawnee Hampton Chase 02/27/91 Stonewall Lake Centre 06/19/91 Shawnee Fredericktowne Est. 10/16/91 Opequon (sections 5, 6 and 7) Coventry Courts 12/04/91 Shawnee Senseny Glen 12/04/91 Shawnee Freeton 05/20/92 Opequon Henry Business Park 02/03/93 Stonewall (10) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Franklin Mobile Hm. Pk. 04/12/93 Hilldale Estates 04/16/93 Shawnee Shawnee (11) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: dates are BOS approval dates Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back Creek Hampton Chase (revised) 05/27/92 Stonewall James R. Wilkins III 04/14/93 Shawnee Prince Frederick Business Park 04/14/93 Shawnee (12) FMDP Administ. Approved (dates are admin. approval_ dates) None (13) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pending:(submit. dates) None 3 (14) BZA Applications Approved• (approval dates) Gregory Groves Timothy Kettlewell Ronald & Rosalie Wehn Wilson McGolerick Scot Marsh / Elizabeth Carroll Allen Ebert / Conard Sirbaugh (15) BZA Applications Denied: None 04/20/93 Shaw 04/20/93 Shaw 04/20/93 BkCk 04/20/93 Opeq 04/20/93 Ston 04/20/93 Gain 2' rear/deck 3.9' side/house Lot size 9' rear/deck Lot size/Frontage Width -to -Depth Ratio (16) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER None E. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #31 1. Route 37 Bob Watkins met with several County citizens concerning the Route 37 Project. 2. Route 642 On Friday, April 2, Kris Tierney met with Chuck Maddox and Ron Mislowsky of G. W. Clifford & Associates, along with Bill Bushman and two other VDOT representatives, to discuss questions relating to drainage and stormwater management in connection with the realignment of Route 642. Several important questions remain to be answered by VDOT concerning what drainage requirements will apply to the project. 3. Corridor H and ISTEA On April 1, Evan Wyatt conducted a land use survey along the Route 55 corridor as part of the Corridor H project study. On April 6, Evan Wyatt met with representatives from Parks and Recreation to discuss a proposal for a county ISTEA Enhancement Project. On April 7, Evan Wyatt attended a Chamber of Commerce breakfast at Lee Jacksons to hear a panel discussion regarding the Corridor H project. On April 14, Evan Wyatt attended a Commonwealth Transportation Board meeting in Richmond to acquire additional information regarding the ISTEA Enhancement Program and Corridor H. 4. Plan Reviews Evan Wyatt conducted the following Plan reviews_ On April 1, reviewed a site plan for an addition to the Shamrock Truck Terminal site. This property is located on Tyson Drive in the Stonewall Industrial Park. On April 7, reviewed a site plan for the FCSA elevated water storage tank. This site is located on Route 642, near the Route 37 interchanqe area. On April 7, met with representatives of Miller Milling to discuss revisions to the office/warehouse building at the Hershey Pasta site. This property is located on Park Center Drive in the Fort Collier Industrial Park. 5. Alternate Wastewater Treatment On Tuesday, April 13, Kris Tierney met with the Technical Advisory Committee overseeing the study of alternate wastewater alternatives for Rural Committee Centers and the consultants to discuss progress to date. The next meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, May 11. 6. Bike Path Stud On April 13, Evan Wyatt produced ACAD maps of the Route 277 corridor to assist Parks and Recreation with a bike path study. 7. DR&RS Meeting of 4115/93 Evan Wyatt reported that Committee discussion involved the potential for an increase in the CUP and Variance Application fees, and the creation of a fee for minor site plan revisions. The committee also discussed performance standards for fleet or truck maintenance facilities in master planned industrial parks zoned M- 1, as well as zoning ordinance definitions for inoperable motor vehicles and mobile homes. 8. Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission's Executive Committee and the Planning_ District TransportationSteer inq Committee Bob Watkins attended meetings of the Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission's Executive Committee and the Planning District's Transportation Steering Committee. 9. House Numbering/911 System Staff is continuing with the update of the House Numbering Project through the use of ACAD11, dBase IV, and general inquiry. 10. Certificate of Appreciation for Julian Carper On April 15, on behalf of the Transportation Committee, Evan Wyatt presented Mr. Julian Carper with a certificate of appreciation Mr. Carper"s work on the Transportation Committee from 1987-1993. P/C Review Date: 5/05/93 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #002-93 FRANKLIN MOBILE HOME PARK LOCATION: 0.9 miles east of Route 7 and I-81 Interchange, on the right MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 55000OA0000380 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned MH -1 (Mobile Home Community District) Land Use - Mobile Home Park ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business General), RP (Residential Performance) M-1—(Light Industrial)and M- 2 (Industrial) - land use, residential and industrial PROPOSED USE: Mobile Home Park -- 47 mobile homes, one single family house REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No overall objections to the Preliminary Master Development Plan. Since the internal roadway network will be private streets, we have no comment concerning design. The streets should be labeled private. The existing entrance serving the property is substandard and will need to be upgraded to current commercial standards. Before making any further comments, this Department will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the ITE Manual for review. Prior to construction the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of a land use permit to cover work on the State's right-of-way. Fire Marshal: Posted fire lanes required at all hydrant locations. On site plan, hydrants will be required, placed so K that no home is greater than 400' from nearest hydrant measured centerline of street. Burning of construction debris requires permit from Fire Marshal's office. Burning of construction debris on site is not permitted. Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times during construction. Inspections Department: Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and section 309, Use Group R (Residential) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Sanitation Authority: First review - 3 items, correct and resubmit. County Engineer: See attached memo from Harvey E. Strawsnyder to Scot Marsh, G. W. Clifford & Associates, dated April 12, 1993. Parks & Recreation: Plan appears to meet open space requirements. However, it does not appear that adequate space has been provided for the required 1.5 recreational units. Also, for the safety of the children, this department would recommend that the tot lot not be located in the area experiencing the heaviest traffic. Planning & Zoning: Staff has general comments and specific concerns regarding this Preliminary Master Development Plan. GENERAL COMMENTS The proposed mobile home park is a permitted use in the MH -1 District. The permitted maximum gross density for this zoning district is eight (8) units per acre. The applicant is proposing a gross density of 5.59 units per acre. The required common open space in this zoning district is fifteen percent (15%). The applicant has indicated that there will be 31.5% open space. This amount of common open space is proposed to include the recreational and buffer areas. SPECIFIC CONCERNS 1) The Zoning Ordinance provides the Planning Commission with the option of allowing the extension of existing private streets within new sections of existing mobile home parks. If this extension is permitted by the Planning Commission, the new private streets must have a minimum right-of-way width of thirty (30) feet and a minimum pavement width of twenty (20) feet. The applicant has proposed an extended private street that meets this requirement. The existing site conditions support a private road that is very well compacted with a gravel surface. The existing entrance from Route 7 is 3 substandard and partially obscured by a billboard. The applicant has proposed improvements that will meet VDOT commercial entrance standards and provide for a double prime and seal surfaced private street throughout the mobile home park. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve this design, as it will improve ingress/egress onto Route 7, and access throughout the site. 2) The applicant needs to provide a conceptual plan for stormwater management with the location of all facilities that will serve this site. 3) The applicant needs to provide the areas defined as woodlands on this site. This inventory is necessary to insure that the permitted amount of disturbed woodlands is not exceeded during development. 4) A four (4) foot sidewalk is provided along the entrance road to this development. It appears that this walkway is approximately fifty (50) feet from the entrance adjoining Route 7. This walkway needs to be extended to provide an adequate travelway for children using school bus service. 5) Parks and Recreation has indicated that recreational space may be inadequate for 1.5 units. It should be noted that the proposed 48 dwelling units will require two (2) recreational units as described by section 165-64 of the Zoning ordinance. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 5/5/93 PC MTG.: Approval, provided that the applicant addresses all concerns and comments of staff, the review agencies,the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors. K )t-� 4 -� J,,-, "`�f t r3 o� ► r G Y i v ,- A4 a=kh 17,o �- e V QJL 4-r► 7'"• B j ,/1 (Cati f45�;4A�e- COUNTY of FREDERICK Harvey E. Strawsnyder, Jr., P.E. Director of Engineering & Inspections 9 North Loudoun St., 2nd Floor 703/665-5643 April 12, 1993 Mr. Scott Marsh, C.L.S. Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Preliminary Master Plan Franklin Mobile Home Park Frederick County, VA Dear Scott: We have completed our review of the subject preliminary master development plan and offer the following comments: I. Detailed site plans will be required for trailer lots 18 through 32 located in steep slope areas. It is suggested that two(2) foot contours be obtained in this area to accommodate the development of the detailed site plans. As a minimum, the detailed site plans shall include finished grades, finished pad elevations and drainage easements with adequately designed conveyance channels or conduits. Depending on the steepness of the finished grades, slope stability analyses may also be required. 2. The proposed Tot Lot should be located in a relatively flat area that is easily accessible. 3. The need for stormwater management should be evaluated and addressed in the site plan phase of development. 4. The road entrance improvements shall be instaFied in accordance with VDOT's requirements. i - s 5. It is anticipated that the entrance improvements will also include the need for drainage improvements along Route 7.` This evaluation should be included in the stormwater managements study conducted during the design of the subdivision site plan: Fax: 703/678-0682 - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester, Virginia - 22604 Please contact me if you have any questions regarding the above comments. cc: Evan Wyatt Planning & Development Sincerely, z J;t Harveyl. Strawsnyder, Jr. P.E. Director of Public Works � Ow IE APR 121993 D APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Frederick County Virginia Date: April 9, 1993 OWNERS NAME: R. W. Franklin. Tnr Application # 6r q —g,3 P.O. Box 148 Stephenson, VA 22656 703-667-1094 (Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest) APPLICANT/ AGENT: Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc.. Address: 200 North Cameron street Winchester, VA 22601 Daytime Phone Number 667-2139 DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: Address: Phone Number Contact Name 7 PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that all required information is provided or is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the preliminary master development plan. All required items must be provided on the PMDP. Background Information• 1. Development's name: Franklin MHP 2. Location of property•Route 7 East 3. Total area of property: 8.587 4. Property ID # (14 Digit) 0055 OOA 000038 5. Property zoning and present use MH -1 Mobile Home Park 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: RP - Residential M-1 (Industrial/Commercial) M-2 (Residential) B-2 (Residential) 7. Proposed Uses: Mobile Home Park 8. Magisterial District • Shawnee 9. •Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? original X Amended 8 General Information: 1. Have the following items been included? North arrow Yes x No Scale Legend Yes x No Boundary Survey Yes No x Total Area Yes x No Topography Yes x No Project Title Yes x No Preparation and Revision Date Yes Yes x -x No No Applicant's Signed Yes 21% Consent Statement 2.06 19---- -- No x 2. Number of phases proposed? one 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes x No 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes x No 5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. Yes x No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes x No 7. Are environmental features clearly shown? Yes x No 8. Describe the following environmental features: 9 Total Area % Disturbed Acres in (Acres) by development open Space Floodplains o Lakes and ponds o 0 0 0 Natural retention 0 areas ° o Steep slopes 0 (15% or more) 0.80 21% Woodlands 2.06 19---- -- 0.63 1.67 9 9. Are the following shown on the master development plan? Street layout Yes x No Entrances Yes x No Parking areas Yes x No Utilities (mains) Yes x No 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Yes No x 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes x No Residential Uses If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. What numbers and types of housing are proposed? 47 Mobile Homes, 1 Single Family House 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes x No Acreage in each housing type Yes No x Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes x No Total acreage Yes -xNo Number of dwellings of each type Yes x No 3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space?_ 31.5% 10 4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes x No 5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed? Typical Tot Lot - swing set, slide, monkey bars etc 6. Are separation buffers required? Yes x No 7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes No x 8. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required? Yes x No 9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by the plan with profiles or examples? Yes x No 11 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the public hearing. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a road from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the 14 digit tax parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. NAME _ Denny's Inc_ Address Rt- 7 Box 81 Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 54-5-5 Dennis T. & Mildred Cole Address S�pso 255 Riverdale Circle Step 22GSb Property ID# 55-A-34 Dennis T. & Mildred Cole Address STEW01.16> 3 255 Riverdale Circle Z2,(.S� ' Property ID# 55-A-42 Molden Real Estate Corp. Address 2400 Valley Avenue Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55-A-39 Gary D. & Lisa L_ YOnley Address613 Blossom Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-25 J. David &-Barbara Bolton Address 619 Blossom Drive- Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-23 Victor H. & Cheryl Hart Address 124 Blossom Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-21 John C. & Mary Trowbridge Address 370 Cypress Street Broomfield, CO691 80020' Property ID# 55B -2-1-1q Arthur D. & Patricia Lingo Address 637 Blossom Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-17 Robert H. & Anna Frey Address 116 Blossom Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# NAME Lincoln & Nellie Cox Address Kirby, WV 26729 Property ID# 55B-2-1-11 Samuel E. Hunt Address 661 Blossom Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-9 Linda Keckley Timbrook Address Rt. 8 Box 430 Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-7 Charles R. & Fay E. Sell Address 106 Blossom Drive Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 55B-2-1-5 7 bVrLCfR , UDoUpot M"Ry AIII-J Address p4 6�5sa►{ Da,vE b✓�,.� , d/A � Property ID# 5513- Z- _ S�'-�-, CH�tR Fi • Ff E• Address o("' z260; Property - IDOr 556 -Z -I-3 �c��2�oC �osCa=�R,x-y Address V, "c u�-rffa- VA 2 ZL ) Property ID# 553- Z -1-Z-1 Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# I A P/C Review Date: 5/05/93 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #005-93 PAUL C. STACY COTTAGE OCCUPATION SMALL ENGINE & LAWN MOWER REPAIR LOCATION: On Route 6641 1717 Jordan Springs Road MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER 56 -A -6A PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned - RA (Rural Areas) Use - Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned - RA (Rural Areas) and RP (Residential Performance) Use - Ag. and residential PROPOSED USE: Cottage occupation - small engine and lawn mower repair. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept of Transportation• No objection to Conditional Use Permit for this property. However should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may need to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. County Building Official• Building shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 310, Use Group S (Storage), of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other codes that apply are Title 28 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities. Permit required shall be a Change of Use on Building to be used. Health Department• See attached letter from Jim Webb, E.S.N., dated March 25, 1993. Stacy C.U.P page 2 _County Fire Marshal:_ I spoke with Mr. Stacy about fire dept. access. He stated that the trucks would not have problems with his driveway which is 100 to 150 yards in length. He also said that if necessary his swimming pool could be utilized for water supply. I request that storage of flammable and combustible liquids for this operation comply with the Statewide Fire Prevention Code. Planning Department: Applicant is proposing a business to repair small engines and lawn mowers in an accessory building located adjacent to his home. Access to this property is along a private driveway that is shared with one other residence. A moderate amount of traffic generated by this use would probably not be a problem but a high intensity of traffic to the property may require road improvements. Allowing this use at a moderate level would have little or no impact on the neighborhood. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MAY 5. 1993 PC MEETING: Approval with the following conditions: 1. Any signage be limited to that allowed for a cottage occupation. 2. Any expansion of existing buildings to accommodate this use will require a new conditional use permit. 3. If use intensity develops to the point that use of the shared private drive is impacted, a new conditional use permit will be required and upgrading of the driveway should be considered. 4. All repair work and storage of parts will be confined inside the structure being used. 5. All review agency comments will be complied with. REQUEST FOR C.U.P. COMMENTS Frederick -Winchester Health Department Attn: Sanitation Engineer P.O. Box 2056 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (7 03) 722-3480 The Frederick -Winchester Health Department is located at the intersection of Smithfield Avenue and Brick Kiln Road, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form 1�rVV1i! IhMp�✓ '��c�„a�� C���'' Applicant's name, address and phone number: 1-7 Name of development and/or description of the request: Location: Health Department Comments: Health Signature and Date: (NOTICE TO HEALTH DEPT. - PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. Lord Fairfax Environmental Health District 800 Smithfield Avenue �e °tee P. o. Box 2056 Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 722-3480 FAX (703) 722-3479 Counties of Clarke, Frederick, Page, Shenandoah, Warren and City of Winchester S -- 2- y -f 3 � �-d -T— ku c.-- J f � �`Le. Coin. � /� Cp�i�rfrrljle !> j' VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT VDHOF HEALTH Proh c dnR You and Your Environ nl Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the ownerother) NAME: T� ADDRESS: -I� � � TELEPHONE 5 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions) 4. The property has a road frontage of �,�,`,� feet and a depth of — feet and consists of acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by'� G as evidenced by deed from recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. Stq on page 43 0 , registry of the County of Frederick. 6. 14 -Digit Property Identification No. 6 -0000 Magisterial District Current Zoning A 7. Adjoining Property: USE North 77 L East South West ZONING �A SQA page -2- CUP Application August, 1990 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) 7TH -Gam..,_ zCU r - Q:: A -.LL ILAJ 6 /J J g! k4tLw 4&tki E2. 7R& -PA -10 9. It is -proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property sought to be permitted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14 -DIGIT NUMBER.) NAME 1�t�-� .►-'So-3uct�.J Address �� 1 -3ca,� i ►�1 SF�S��.� �1� • �t �� Property ID# -;-o,AET C Address U \-I, Property ID# 2 -TA `S �l c��©,S Address FA I C18 v v R. Property ID# Address Property ID# M, �(0 t:-ki Address NJ Property ID# Address, ' Property ID# i I e NAME C Address LIL3 Property ID# L� Li -I S Address• I �r v Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# page -4- CUP Application August, 1990 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address i1t-) Owners' Telephone No. g 0 3_ C.(,-7 _3 g s PIN 56 -A -6A CUP # 005-93 PAUL C. STACY 15. 5 45 ,• • �.fY'+\ �� ��y;:�- ,\ �p/ nom' . ..i �y � � O �L �_ 1��� � /�� 1n.. �� 41 '. � tY .� I •I II l y P -A RP", RP - ' COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner I1 RE: Truck or Freight Maintenance Facility Amendments DATE: April 22, 1993 The Planning Commission discussed a proposal to allow fleet or truck maintenance facilities as a principal use in the M-1 Zoning District on April 7, 1993. The Planning Commission felt that the use was appropriate in master planned industrial parks, but not all property zoned M-1 Light Industrial District. The Planning Commission also felt that provision should be made to allow for one gasoline storage tank, as well as one diesel storage tank. The Planning Commission instructed staff to have the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) revise the proposed performance standards to reflect this discussion, and advertise the revised language for public hearing. The following information regards proposed amendments to Article X - Business and Industrial Zoning Districts, and Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. Staff asks that the Planning Commission review the proposed amendments and forward this information to the Board of Supervisors for final resolution. 9 North Loudoun Strect P.O. Box 601 VVinchcster. VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 AMENDMENT Approvals: PLANNING COMMISSION May 5, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 165, ZONING WHEREAS, An ordinance to amend Chapter 165, Zoning, of the Frederick County Code, Article X, Business and Industrial District, to allow truck or fleet maintenance facilities in master planned industrial parks zoned M-1, Light Industrial District, and Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, to create performance standards for truck or fleet maintenance facilities that are located in master planned industrial parks zoned M-1 (Light Industrial District), was referred to the Planning Commission on May 5, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption on May 5, 1993; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this ordinance adoption on 1993; and WHFA AS, the Frederick County Board of Supervisors finds the adoption of this ordinance to be in the best interest of the public health, safety, welfare, convenience, and in good zoning practice; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors as follows: That Chapter 165 of the Frederick County Code, Zoning, Article X, Business and Industrial Districts, and Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, is amended as described on the following attachment: ARTICLE X - Business and Industrial Zoning Districts M-1 Light Industrial District Allowed Uses Truck or freight maintenance facilities (No SIC Code) ARTICLE IV - Supplementary Use Regulations Truck or freight maintenance facilities Where allowed, truck or freight maintenance facilities shall meet the following requirements: A. In the M-1 Light Industrial District, truck or freight maintenance facilities shall only be permitted in industrial parks. B. Truck or freight maintenance facilities may have fuel service provided that it is limited to one gasoline storage tank of 10,000 gallons or less and one diesel storage tank of 10,000 gallons or less. C. All repair and maintenance operations shall occur within a completely enclosed structure. D. Outdoor storage of parts associated with repair and maintenance shall not be permitted. E. Retail sales shall not be permitted. F. The Planning Commission may require additional buffers and screening other than those defined in section 165-37 of this Chapter. This ordinance shall be in effect upon its passage. Passed this day of , 1993. A Copy Teste John R. Riley, Jr. Frederick County Administrator COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II FU RE: Corridor H Resolution DATE: April 23, 1993 Staff provided the Planning Commission with information regarding the proposed Corridor H project during the regular meeting of April 21, 1993. This information was intended to familiarize the Planning Commission with the issues, impacts, and cost associated with this project. The following provides a summary of events to date: February 9, 1993 - Middletown Elementary School First public meeting held regarding proposed Corridor H candidate routes. February 10, 1993 - Indian Hollow Elementary School Second public meeting held regarding proposed Corridor H candidate routes. March 1, 1993 - Transportation Committee Meeting Staff provides committee with the Executive Summary of the Corridor Selection Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (SDEIS) for review. March 12, 1993 - West Virginia Department of Highways Meeting West Virginia selects a candidate corridor that is proposed to tie into Route 55 at Virginia. March 30, 1993 - Land Use Assessment Staff conducts a land use survey along the Route 55 corridor in Frederick County, and along Routes 600, 603, 608, and 609. 9 North Loudoun Strcct P.O. Box 601 Winchcstcr, VA 22601 Winchcstcr, VA 22604 Page -2- PC Memo April 23, 1993 April 5, 1993 - Transportation Committee Meeting Staff review of land use survey with committee. Committee recommends that staff attend Commonwealth Transportation Board meeting in Richmond and report all information to PC and BOS for disposition. April 7, 1993 - Chamber of Commerce Meeting (Lee Jackson) Staff attends panel discussion meeting to determine impacts from an economic development, commercial distribution, and tourism point of view. April 14, 1993 - Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) Meeting (Richmond, VA) Staff attends meeting. VDOT presents information on the Route SS corridor alternative. CTB states that funding for project would probably fall within the Staunton District budget. April 21, 1993 - Frederick County Planning. Commission Meeting Staff presents all available information to Planning Commission. The Planning Commission has been invited to a worksession regarding Corridor H. This worksession will be held on April 29, 1993 at 12:00 p.m. in the Board of Supervisors meeting room. VDOT staff and CTB representative, Dr. Thomas will be present to answer questions and address concerns. Staff will provide the Planning Commission with a sample resolution during the regular meeting of May 5, 1993. The staff will provide a draft resolution concerning Corridor H based on the worksession discussion. The Planning Commission will need to make a recommendation concerning the resolution. I COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703 / 678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Planning Director ,�(((��/✓ SUBJECT: Battlefield Vision Project and Grant vl DATE: May 5, 1993 The Frederick County Planning Department is proposing to apply for a grant from the American Battlefield Protection Partnership Funding Program to support the development of a plan for the preservation and use of civil war sites in Winchester and Frederick County. The project will use information from the historic and archeological surveys, the National Park Service Study, and the work currently being conducted by the Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission. Priority sites will be identified and evaluated. The project will be supervised by the Battlefield Task Force that is being formed. The Task Force will include representatives of preservation groups, local government, property owners and the business community. The primary task of the project will be to develop information that can be presented to the public. Public events will be held to develop a public consensus on the plan. A variety of tools, incentives and approaches will need to be identified to implement the plan. Grant funding will allow us to obtain specialized consultant support for portions of this project. The staff would appreciate a recommendation of support for the grant application from the Planning Commission. RWW/gll 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604