Loading...
PC 03-03-93 Meeting AgendaFILE COPY AGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia MARCH 3, 1993 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Meeting Minutes of January 20, 1993 ............................. A 2) Bimonthly Report ........................................... B 3) Committee Reports ........................................ C 4) Citizen Comments ............................ a ............. D 5) Master Development Plan #001-93 of Prince Frederick Office Park for a business office park. This property is located south of Route 50, west of Carper's Valley Golf Course in the Shawnee District. (Mr. Wyatt)................................................E PUBLIC HEARINGS 6) Conditional Use Permit #002-93 of Ryland Homes for an off premise business sign. This property is located on the west side of Route 647 at the intersection of Westmoreland Drive in the Opequon District. (Mr. Miller) ................................................ F MISCELLANEOUS 7) Discussion with G. W. Clifford & Associates regarding a preliminary master development plan for Franklin Mobile Nome Park on the south side of Route 7. G (Mr. Wyatt) ............................................... 8) Discussion with Greenway Engineering regarding a proposed single family cluster development on Greenwood Road. II (Mr. Tierney) .............................................. 9) Discussion regarding rezoning impacts on Fire & Rescue facilities I (Mr. Watkins) .............................................. 10) Other (no attachment) MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on January 20, 1993. PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman; Todd D. Shenk, Gainesboro District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Ronald W. Carper, Gainesboro District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Manuel C. DeHaven, Stonewall District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; and John H. Light, Stonewall District. ABSENT: John R. Marker, Vice Chairman/Back Creek District; Beverly Sherwood, Board Liaison; and George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; Planning_ Staff present were: Robert W. Watkins, Director; W. Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator; and Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Director. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES The first order of business was the consideration of the minutes of December 2, 1992 and December 16, 1992. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Light, the minutes of December 2, 1992 were unanimously approved as presented. Upon motion made by , Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Light, the minutes of December 16, 1992 were unanimously approved as presented. BIMONTHLY REPORT Chairman Golladay accepted the bimonthly report for the Commission's information. 2 COMMITTEE REPORTS Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) 1/19/93 Mtg. Mr. Shenk reported that the HRAB discussed the joint worksession scheduled for February 27 at 7:00 p.m. They discussed the proposed presentation and key points to be discussed involving the rural landmarks survey, the education program, the plaque design contest, and a comprehensive approach to historic resources. Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) 1/19/93 Mtg. Mr. Thomas reported that the DRRS discussed some proposed changes to the subdivision and zoning ordinance. He said that the subcommittee also discussed potential directions that the subcommittee may choose to take in 1993. Planning Commission Subcommittee Structure for 1993 Mr. Watkins presented a list of subcommittee and liaison appointments that were in effect in 1992. Mr. Watkins said that the only change proposed for 1993 is that Mr. Carper will be the liaison for the City of Winchester and Mr. Shenk will be the liaison for the HRAB. The Commission next discussed non -commissioner membership on the DRRS and the CPPS. They decided to appoint one citizen member from each district to each of the two subcommittees for a total of five citizen members per subcommittee. The Commission felt the positions should be advertised and each interested party should complete an information sheet. It was decided that the Planning Commission Chairman would make the final appointments based on qualifications and level of interest. DISCUSSION RE: WILKINS MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Mr. Tierney said that the Master Development Plan for the Wilkins Apartments and Townhouses was tabled for thirty (30) days during the December 16, 1992 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Tierney said that the applicant has not received all the required review agency comments and has requested that this review be tabled until the Commission's February 17th meeting. Upon motion made by Mr. Wilson and seconded by Mr. Shenk, 3 BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously agree to table the Master Development Plan for Wilkins Apartments and Townhouses until February 17th, at the applicant's request. 1993-1994 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Mr. Tierney said that the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee met on January 5 to review the submissions received from the various county agencies for the 1993- 94 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). He said that the 93-94 CIP contains 28 projects, five less than the 92-93 CIP. Mr. Tierney said that the Subcommittee expressed some concern regarding the amount of money proposed to be invested in the Stonewall (air conditioning) and Robinson (air conditioning and replacing windows for energy efficiency) Elementary Schools for renovation, since the long term future of these facilities was uncertain. He said that they also had concerns on the proposed Landfill Maintenance Facility (questions on cost and need). Mr. Tierney said that the need for the facility is based on being able to do work at the landfill rather than contracting out for maintenance and hauling the equipment. OSHA requirements contributed to the cost of the facility. Discussion ensued on the possibility of covering one of the County's swimming pools so that the James Wood Swim Team could have access to a county swimming facility instead of using the City's pool at the War Memorial building. The Commission decided that a formal communication to the Parks and Recreation Commission needed to be made on this issue. Mr. Thomas moved that the Commission add #29 to the CIP priority list --covering one of the County's pools for year-round use by the high school swim team and county residents. This motion was seconded by Mr. Shenk and unanimously approved. The Commission next reviewed various other requests on the CIP list for conformance with the County's Comprehensive Plan. The Commission was in general agreement with the priority listing, although some Commission members expressed concern about the amount of money designated for Parks & Recreation projects and cost of the maintenance facility at the landfill. They also had concerns about investing money into renovation of the elementary schools. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Shenk, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the 1993-1994 CTP with the addition of #29, covering of one of the county's pools for year-round use; and, in addition, the Planning Commission requests that the Board of Supervisors 4 approve the 1993-1994 CIP. ADJOURNMENT No further business was discussed and the meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.. Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Watkins, Secretary James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman M E M O R A N D U M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report DATE: February 19, 1993 (1) Rezoninas Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Twin Lakes 4/04/90 (Shaw) (RA to B2/RP) (2) Rezoninas Approved: _(dates are BOS meeting dates) None (3) Rezonin s Denied: dates are BOS meeting dates None (4) Conditional Use Permits Pending: (dates are submittal dates) John & Rachael Black 01/04/93 Gain Cottage Occupation Catalog Sales Ryland Homes 01/14/93 Opeq Off Premise Sign (5) Conditional Use Permits Approved: dates are approval dates None (6) Site Plans Pending: (dates are submittal dates) Wheatlands Wastewater Fac. 9/12/89 Opeq Trmt.facil Grace Brethren Church 6/08/90 Shaw Church Flex Tech 10/25/90 Ston Lgt. Industrial Hampton Chase 12/18/90 Ston S.F. & T.H. Lake Centre 05/15/91 Shaw Townhouses Red Star Express Lines 05/24/91 Ston Whse. Addition Freeton 04/27/92 Opeq Townhouses Salvation Army 12/03/92 Ston Ofc/Housing 2 Valley Proteins (rev) 12/16/92 Gain Industrial Glaize Components 01/21/93 Shaw Mfg. Plant (7) Site Plans Approved: (dates are approval dates) Cracker Barrel 02/05/93 Shaw Restaurant/ Gift Shop (8) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates) None (9) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (P/C approval dates Abrams Point, Phase I 6/13/90 Shawnee Hampton Chase 02/27/91 Stonewall Lake Centre 06/19/91 Shawnee Fredericktowne Est. 10/16/91 Opequon (sections 5, 6 and 7) Coventry Courts 12/04/91 Shawnee Senseny Glen 12/04/91 Shawnee Freeton 05/20/92 Opequon Henry Business Park 02/03/93 Stonewall (10) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates) James R. Wilkins III 11/02/92 Shawnee Prince Frederick Business Park 01/19/93 Shawnee (11) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: (dates are BOS approval dates Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back Creek Hampton Chase (revised) 05/27/92 Stonewall (12) FMDP Administ. Approved (dates are admin. approval dates) None (13) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pendin :(submit: dates David Walker 01/21/93 Shaw 15' rear/house Trademark Ent. Inc. 02/19/93 Ston 10' front/house David Smith 02/19/93 Ston 30' road eff. buffet and setbacks from driveways 3 (14) BZA Applications Approved: (approval dates) Donald Stotler 02/16/93 Gain Jerry Bain 02/16/93 BkCk (15) BZA Applications Denied• None Lot size 16' front/garage (16) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER None E. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #27 1. Corridor H Bob Watkins attended the informational portion of the Corridor H hearing in Middletown. 2. ISTEA On February 4, Bob Watkins and Evan Wyatt met with EDC's June Wilmot and Dan Malone; LFPDC's Tom Christoffel; and City Planning Director, Tim Youmans, to discuss strategies in relation to the new Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act. 3. Route 642 On February 2, Kris Tierney met with Bob Sager, Harrington Smith, and Mrs. Hack and her son and daughter, to discuss the Route 642 realignment project. The County will need to acquire approximately one acre at the intersection of Routes 642 and 647 from Mrs. Hack in order to make the planned improvements to the intersection. 4. House Numbering/911 System Staff is continuing with the update of the House Numbering Project through the use of ACAD11, dBase IV, and general inquiry. 5. Plan Reviews LannyBise conducted the following lan reviews: On February 5, approved the Cracker Barrel site plan. Evan Wyatt conducted the followin lan reviews: On February 1, met with Austin Spitler of Greenway, Inc. to discuss requirements associated with a proposed Master Development Plan for zero lot line homes and apartments. This site is located along Lee Avenue, north of the Winchester City limits. On February 4, conducted a site plan inspection for Phase II at Albin Ridge Mini -Storage. This site is located along Route 522 North, adjacent to the school bus shop. On February 8, met with representatives of Green Bay Packaging and county review agencies to complete site plan review requirements. On February 10, met with representatives of Miller Milling to discuss additions to the Hershey Pasta site. 6. Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) On February 11, the DRRS discussed current landscaping requirements, and are considering the creation of a county landscaping ordinance. 7. Capital Facilities Impact Model Lanny Bise has been updating the Capital Facilities Impact Model with 1992 figures from various agencies such as the School Board, Parks and Recreation, and Fire and Rescue. 8. 1992 Annual Report for the Department of Planning Lanny Bise compiled information for the preparation of the Planning Department's 1992 Annual Report. 9. School Bus Routes Booklets On February 3, Evan Wyatt net with representatives of the Frederick County School Board Transportation Division to assist with the update of school bus route booklets. 10. County Brochures On February 5, Evan Wyatt, Ron Lilley, and Lanny Bise met to discuss the creation of various county brochures. 11. Real Estate Market Study Lanny Bise met with City Planning Director, Tim Youmans, and EDC's Dan Malone on February 12 regarding the Real Estate Market Study. 12. GIS Software On February 2, Evan Wyatt met with Don Anderson of Professional Data Consultants to discuss GIS software and electrostatic plotters. 13. Motor Vehicle Definitions On February 9, Evan Wyatt met with representatives of the Division of Motor Vehicles to insure that proposed definitions for the zoning ordinance conformed with state definitions. 14. Zoning Violations Lanny Bise made two general district court appearances for zoning violations and visited four zoning ordinance violation sites. 15. Professional Development Lanny Bise began learning the Harvard Graphics and Ami Pro software programs. P/C Review Date: 3/3/93 \ J, �( OV MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN J' #001-93 J V PRINCE FREDERICK OFFICE PARK LOCATION: South of Route 50, west of Carper's Valley Golf Course MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 64000OA0000890 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business General) land use - vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business General), B-3 (Industrial Transition) and M-2 (Industrial) - land use, business, industrial and vacant PROPOSED USE: Business office park REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter from W. H. Bushman to Mr. George Foard dated January 13, 1993. Fire Marshal: Posted fire lanes required at all hydrant locations per Frederick County Chapter 10. Add the following to general construction notes on site plan: 1) Burning of land clearing debris requires permits from Fire Marshal office. Burning of construction debris is not permitted in Frederick County. 2) All fire safety and access issues will be addressed on site plan. Inspections Department: Buildings shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Other codes that apply are title 28 Code of Federal Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities. Shall comment on Use Group and handicap parking 2 at the time of building site plans review. Sanitation Authority: First review - 12 items, correct and resubmit. County Engineer: See attached memo from Harvey E. Strawsnyder to PHR&A dated December 4, 1992. Winchester Regional Airport: See attached comments from Kenneth F. Wiegand, Executive Director. Planning & Zoning: GENERAL COMMENTS: The proposed Master Development Plan is for a 91.903 acre tract that is currently zoned B-2 Business General District. The proposed use for this tract is office sites and parking. The B-2 District does not require a specified maximum gross density; however, all developed areas must meet requirements of the Zoning Ordinance including a floor area to lot area ratio (FAR). SPECIFIC CONCERNS: Staff has specific concerns regarding transportation issues, environmentally sensitive areas, and stormwater management for this project. The specific concerns are as follows: 1) Transportation - The applicant has revised the preliminary Master Development Plan to extend two cul-de-sacs near the adjoining property boundary lines. Staff believes that a dedicated right-of-way easement needs to be provided to the Garber property and the Winchester Regional Airport property. This right-of-way easement needs to be in place to insure that a future road network option is possible for this area. The applicant needs to provide this easement on the preliminary Master Development Plan and also include this easement as an integral part of the deed of dedication to Frederick County 2) Environmentally sensitive areas - The applicant has indicated that there are 20 acres of land defined as steep slope on this site. The preliminary Master Development Plan states that the impacted amount of steep slope will be a 250 maximum. The applicant needs to include the amount of steep slope that is proposed to be disturbed through the development of roads, the installation of water lines, sewer lines, and natural gas lines, and creation of stormwater management areas. This information is necessary for staff to determine the amount of steep slope disturbance proposed for site improvements, and to insure that future development does not exceed this requirement. 3 3) Stormwater management - The applicant states that the existing pond on the Carper's Valley Golf Club property will be modified to manage stormwater for development associated with Phase I of this site. The Master Development Plan does not provide the location of this pond, and does not provide a stormwater drainage easement. Staff believes that the applicant needs to provide the County Engineer with enough detailed information to verify that the existing pond is an adequate stormwater management facility. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 313193 PC MTG • Approval, provided that the applicant addresses staff concerns, review agency comments, and any concerns of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. RAY D. PETHTEL COMMISSIONER COMMONWEALTH Of VIRC-jINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 January 13, 1993 Mr. George Foard C/O Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates 100 South Main Street P. O. Box 46 Bridgewater, VA 22812 Dear Mr. Foard: �nri i n 1993 � I4KI-_LD_--- WILLIAM H. ©USIINaAN Hf_SIDI NI I NtIINI Iii TELE 1703) 984 41 33 FAX (70;)984 9/u1 Ref: Prince Frederick Office Park Route 50 East Frederick County We have completed our review of the -above referenced project's preliminary master plan. The following comments are preliminary and subject to change when we receive a more detailed site plan. 1. A traffic signal may be required at the intersection with Route 50 and the proposed entrance at build out of Phase I. The same may be required for the west entrance at Phase 11 build out. Developer participation for any and all costs incurred to perform the signal work will be required and included in the developer's land use permit assembly. 2. A left turn lane with proper taper will be required at the crossover serving the proposed east entrance. A right turn lane may also be needed at this location. 3. A right turn lane along the property frontage terminating west of the proposed west entrance thus providing a right turn lane for the west entrance and pavement continuity between the two entrances will be required. A portion of this right turn lane could be delayed until Phase II is constructed. 4. Curb and gutter should be considered in the entrance design for Phase I and should connect the existing curb and gutter terminating west of the proposed west entrance during Phase IT development. 5. Any grading or entrances which may require the adjustment of any guardrail will be the developer's responsibility. TRANSPORTATION FOR TMC' 21 ST CFNTI IRY c r '41 , L� 0, hl �,. f� YY a Vf,. COMMONWEALTH Of VIRC-jINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION P. O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, 22824 January 13, 1993 Mr. George Foard C/O Patton, Harris, Rust & Associates 100 South Main Street P. O. Box 46 Bridgewater, VA 22812 Dear Mr. Foard: �nri i n 1993 � I4KI-_LD_--- WILLIAM H. ©USIINaAN Hf_SIDI NI I NtIINI Iii TELE 1703) 984 41 33 FAX (70;)984 9/u1 Ref: Prince Frederick Office Park Route 50 East Frederick County We have completed our review of the -above referenced project's preliminary master plan. The following comments are preliminary and subject to change when we receive a more detailed site plan. 1. A traffic signal may be required at the intersection with Route 50 and the proposed entrance at build out of Phase I. The same may be required for the west entrance at Phase 11 build out. Developer participation for any and all costs incurred to perform the signal work will be required and included in the developer's land use permit assembly. 2. A left turn lane with proper taper will be required at the crossover serving the proposed east entrance. A right turn lane may also be needed at this location. 3. A right turn lane along the property frontage terminating west of the proposed west entrance thus providing a right turn lane for the west entrance and pavement continuity between the two entrances will be required. A portion of this right turn lane could be delayed until Phase II is constructed. 4. Curb and gutter should be considered in the entrance design for Phase I and should connect the existing curb and gutter terminating west of the proposed west entrance during Phase IT development. 5. Any grading or entrances which may require the adjustment of any guardrail will be the developer's responsibility. TRANSPORTATION FOR TMC' 21 ST CFNTI IRY .I Mr. George Foard Ref: Prince Frederick Office Park January 13, 1993 Page #2 6. The existing cut section in the Route 50 median east of the proposed east entrance will have to be removed to obtain a minimum 650' of sight distance to the east. Prior to making any further comments this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and a trip generation analysis for review. We appreciate the opportunity to review your proposal and ask you give us a call should you have any questions. Sincerely, William H. Bushman Trans. Resident Engineer By: Robert B. Childress Hwy. Permits & Subd. Spec. Senior RBC/rf Enclosures xc: Mr. J. B. Diamond Mr. R. W. Watkins FREDERICK COUNTY ENGINEER 9 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET, 2ND FLOOR WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 (703) 665-5643 Preliminary Master Development Plan DATE2 December 4, 1992 PROJECT: Prince Frederick office Park Shawnee Magisterial District Frederick county, Virginia DESIGNER: Patton Harris Rust and Associates, P.C. 100 South Main Street Bridgewater, Virginia 22812 BENTS 1. The preliminary master plan indicates three (3) stormwater management ponds. One (1) of these structures is proposed on property owned by the Carper's Valley Golf Club. Indicate whether the stormwater management ponds will be phased with the development or constructed prior to any development. Provide an explanation of the phasing if that option is utilized. 2. The design of the stormwater management facilities shall be based on the assumption that 75 percent of the property in question is available for total development (i.e., roads, parking and buildings). 3. It is suggested that consideration be given to contacting the upstream property owners to determine their interest in participating in the construction of a regional storm.water management facility. A regional facility could serve this site as well as others with the costs shared by all., C n. Ha Ay Strawsnydar, ,7 . , P E. Direato f Public Works REQUEST FOR MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN COMMENTS Wincliu!3L-ur Itegi_olial Airpor:L Attn: Executive Director Route 1, Box 208^A -- Winchester, Virginia 22601 (703) 662--2422 The Winchester Regional Airport is located on Route 64-5, a:�f of )route 522 South, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: c� Lewis M. Costello Rt Al _ (703) 665-0050 107 north Kent Street, Winchester, VA 22601 Name of.development and/or description of the request: Prince Frederick office Park Master Plan for Office Park Location: _ _ South of Route 50s_ west of Car's Valley Golf Course and North of Winchester Regional Airport Winchester Regional Airports Comments: Please review corrments on lock. Airport Signature and nate: W%LF1116111 1,?3- 1=1 MA DI RFCTOR (NOTICE TO AIRPORT. * PLEA5 ETURN THISOF2�"r(5 APPLICANT. ) rQTICE TO APPLICANT it is your responsibility to complete this form -is accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. Please consider the following comments when reviewing this Request for Master Development Plan: r The Developer should be familiar with and be required to comply with the provisions of the Frederick County Airport Zoning District (AP -1) and Airport Support Aren (ASA) described in thb 'Frederick County Comprehensive policy Plan. The developer should also be familiar with the provisions and requirements of the following codes: Title 15.1 Code of Virginia, Section 489 (Purpose of Zoning Ordinances) and Section 991.02 (Airport Safety Zoning). Title 5.1-25.1 Code of Virginia (Permits required for Erection of Certain structures.) As Winchester Regional Airport expands services and operations# noise associated with such expansion is very likely to increase. The -Airport Support Area eatabliahed by the Frederick County Comprehensive. Policy Plan is designed to discourage reaidential development in the vicinity of the airport to preclude citizen concerns for noise created by aircraft operating on, to and from Winchester Regional Airport. If the developer is planning residential development adjacent to the ASA or under a flight path used regularly hip aircraft outside of the ASA as they arrive or depart the Airport# he should be either required or encouraged to insulnta all habitable structures for noise and be required to epecificmlly addressr in the property Covenants and Easements, existing airport related noise and the probability of increased noiao as airport operations expand. F COM0131"7 1 HT? nng gu'TI 3?MO JVITU330 APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Frederick County Virginia Date: January 19, 1993 Application # OWNERS NAME: Estate of Monfred D. Custer, William H. Clement Maurice W. Perry, Richard G Dick, & Lewis M Costello (Please list the names —of—a-1 l owners or parties in interest) APPLICANT/AGENT: Lewis M. Costello- Agent Address: 107 North Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 Daytime Phone Number (703) 665-0050 DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY: Patton Harris Rust & Associates Address: P. O. Box 46 Bridgewater, VA 22812 Phone Number (703) 828-2616 Contact Name George D. Foard 7 PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN CHECKLIST The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in insuring that all required information is provided or is available to allow review by the County. This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with the preliminary master development plan. All required items must be provided on the PMDP. Background Information: 1. Development's name: Prince Frederick Office Park 2. Location of property: South of Route 50, West of Carper's Valley Golf Course 3. Total area of property: 91.903 Acres 4. Property ID # (14 Digit) 640000A 0000089 5. Property zoning and present use B -2 -Vacant 6. Adjoining property zoning and present use: B-2 ^usiness, B-2 Vacant, B-3 Business, M-2 Industrial 7. Proposed Uses: Business Office Parr 8. Magisterial District: Shawnee 9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original X Amended A General Information: 1. Have the following items been included? North arrow Scale Legend Boundary Survey Total Area Topography Project Title Preparation and Revision Date Applicant's Signed Consent Statement 2. Number of phases proposed? 2 Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes X No Yes 20 No X 3. Are the proposed phases shown on the Master Development Plan? Yes X No 4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated? Yes X No 5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project and all public roads within 2,000 feet. Yes X No 6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes X No 7. Are environmental features clearly shown? Yes X No 8. Describe the following environmental features: W Total Area % Disturbed Acres in (Acres) by development Open Space Floodplains 6.2 3.3 N/A Lakes and ponds 0 --_- N/A Natural retention areas Steep slopes 0 ____ N/A (15% or more) 20 25 N/A Woodlands 30.5 25 N/A W 9. Are the following shown, on the master development plan? Street layout Yes X No_ Entrances Yes X No_ Parking areas Yes No X Utilities (mains) Yes X No 10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided? Yes X No 11. Have all historical structures been identified? Yes No X None Residential Uses If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP, (Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following items should be completed. 1. What numbers and types of housing are proposed? N/A 2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each phase: Open space acreage Yes No N/A Acreage in each housing type Yes No N A Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes x No Total acreage Yes x No Number of dwellings of each type Yes No N A 3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open space? 0 10 4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes No X 5. what types of recreational facilities are proposed? N/A None 6. Are separation buffers required? Yes X No 7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes No X 8. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required? Yes No X 9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by the plan with profiles or examples? Yes No N/A 11 ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the public hearing. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is an, property abutting the requested property on the side cr rear or ani, property directly across a road from the requested property. Th' applicant is required to obtain the following information on eacl adjoining property including the 14 digit tax parcel identification numbe, which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. NAME 13 Address Lennox Hill Station Abraham A. Rosen k Property ID# 64 - - A - - 101 Address Lenox Hill Station Delco Development New York NY Property ID# 64 - - A - - 102 Address 1401 Millwood Avenue Carper's Valley Golf Club Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - A - - 87 Address 1401 Millwood Avenue Carper's Valley Golf Club Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 87 - A Address Route 1, Box 208-A Winchester Regional Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 88 Airport Authority Address 1275 Millwood Pike Marlow & Board Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 89A Address 1205 Route 50 East Winchester VA 22601 property ID# 64 - - A - - 97 Winchester Harley Davidson Address Route 2, 18 Cline Drive Thurston B. Collins Inwood, WV 25428 Property ID# 64 - A ((4)) 8 & 9 Address 1184 Millwood Pike Jerry G. Helen H. Kirk Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - A ((4)) 10 & 11 Address 130 Morgan Street Prenith Lenear Bartley, Winchester, VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - A ((4)) 20 et als 13 NAME Donald E. Garner c/o Patricia Biggs Delco Development Co. Winchester Office Center Address 261 Shawnee Avenue wincnester, Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64- - A - - 4 Address Lenox Hill Station James H. Carroll New York, NY Property ID# 64 - - A - - 4 - A Address P. O• Box 222 ter, VA 22601 Middlebur VA 22117 Property ID# 64 - - A - - A Address 1401 Millwood Avenue Carper`s Valley Golf Course Property ID# 64 - - A - - 100 - A wincnester, VA 22601 Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 91 - A Property ID,# 64 - - A - - 100 James H. Carroll Address P. 0. Box 3214 Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 86 ter, VA 22601 Address Route 6, Box 64 Raymond N. &Frances Riding g Winchester VA 22601 er. VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 90 Address Property ID# 14 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 100 - A Address Route 6, Box 63 O. Box 2740 chester VA 22601 Address EID Shirley F. Carter Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 91 - A Property ID,# 64 - - A - - 100 James H. Carroll Address P. 0. Box 3214 Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - A ((4)) 20A Address 1151 Yale Drive Guy E. Strosnider ter, VA 22601 LID#64 Property - - A - - 92 Address ox 2740 Lewis M. Costello Et Al er. VA 22601 Address Property ID# 14 Property ID# 64 - - A - - 100 - A Lewis M. Costello O. Box 2740 chester VA 22601 Address EID Property # 64 -- A - - 100 - B Ryco Management Corp. Address P . O. Box 1168 Front Royal, VA Property ID,# 64 - - A - - 100 James H. Carroll Address P. 0. Box 3214 Winchester VA 22601 Property ID# 64 - A ((4)) 20A Address Property ID# 14 P/C Review Date: 3/03/93 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #002-93 RYLAND HOMES Off Premise Business Sign LOCATION: On the west side of Route 647 at the intersection of Westmoreland Drive MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER 75000OA0000370 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Business), land use - Church ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE• Zoned B-1 (Neighborhood Business) and RP (Residential Performance), land use - vacant, residential and Interstate 81 PROPOSED USE: Off premise business sign REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation• In accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, no private advertisement sign can be placed on the State's right-of-way. Prior to erection on private property, a permit may have to be applied for through our District Office in Staunton. Inspections Department• Sign shall comply with the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 311, Use Group U (utility and misc.) of the BOCA National Building Code/1990. Plannin De artment: the subdivision that business sign and not business signs require currently existing an complaint against the Since this sign is so far it advertises, it is a simple real estate sign. a conditional use permit. d this application is a applicant. removed from considered a Off premise The sign is result of a Page 2 Black CUP STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MARCH 3, 1993 PC MEETING: Approval with the following conditions: 1. That the sign meet all the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of Virginia. Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting__ BOS Meeting, �y-9., APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the NAME: ADDRESS: A -C-/ 5` 6A -LM � T TELEPHONE / "71);;? ) S'/_ 5' - f A, 2. Please list all owners, occupants, the property: u Id &'V -k /"4P- N4A4 575kL-, c4C,it}t,4, l,J',KclrQtc.�. — owner / other) it -;5 b -) O or parties in interest of Full Gos e% Biu v 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions) V*- z" �<- 4. The property has a road frontage of /52• 7 feet and a depth of 761�. q7 feet and consistsof � • U 3 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned b L SS��K-/� "°,�s evidenced by deed from V-Av- - u,0rt vy1 ';— r-Al�ecorded (previous owner) in deed book no. on page q registry of the County of Frederick. 7/ Lsa EZ-�,c Tri aC-up 60�, SS_3 p�. 6. 14 --Digit Property Identification No. 7S-- R - 3 Magisterial District Current Zoning 6-1 7. Adjoining Property: North USE ZONING � East South ✓ / West page -2- CUP Application August, 1990 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Plannin Dept. before completing) e1ca-Z 9. It is -proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: Ale 1-1-.-e 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property sought to be permitted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14 -DIGIT NUMBER._)_ NAME ;Sys Address T�jd x 0-3 g Sf�?2`� Crj �'ZZ Property ID# z -7 -5-- '�e y- Address Property ID# Address 1 4 Property ID# Address Property ID# Address i Property ID# Address Property ID# ;Sys page -S- CUP Application August, 1990 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. 6(MNiU ncl b 5;j n G rte: page -4- CUP Application August, 1990 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board bf Supervisor Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. h �es CUP # 002 93 RYLAND HOMES PI'S # 75-A-37 j 4o / I „ 66 6• _ I 'a' 1� e 54 _ . 5s �. , •0 PL. 4383 i j x Q�va / r� , 5 Lo N( -� 50A tT /- �, 4t II ' ! I II IIi II � II I - rv�9• ,{ / R1 �I I: ! To.e I I la II , r A 3s pp 13, •-i , y � I T �09 u� � o � I I � � I I 1,9 �� {• � I P IO &S II��mA illi ��.i9 x s l .ea a oz II I II r <_ nn GD n •r al E4 �✓— ,,:� � /r T] n ' „IwT., 143 72 164/ �/ .'� to zo, ' Ise 71 , • ll�. ti 713M / J � lW ,II qrl] /•I _� �/ / / .A N W eoC / I1 ]� 3t ill 1 . r tle / COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 /665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt e RE: Informal Discussion For Franklin Mobile Home Park DATE: February 19, 1993 Mr. C.E. Maddox of G.W. Clifford & Associates has requested time during the March 3, 1993 Planning Commission meeting for an informal discussion. Mr. Maddox plans to discuss a proposal for the creation of a 49 lot mobile home park, located on the south side of Route 7, adjacent to Shenandoah Hills subdivision. The site is zoned MH -1 Mobile Home Community District, and currently contains 15 occupied sites. Enclosed is a preliminary sketch of the proposed development and a vicinity map for your information. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 gilbert w. clif ford & associates, inc. 200 North Cameron Street s Winchester, Virginia 22601 703-667-2139 • Fax: 703-665-0493 Mr. Evan Wyatt Frederick County Planning 9 N. Loudoun Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Evan, February 19, 1993 Department Re: Franklin Mobile Home Project Thank you for our meeting last week where we reviewed the concept planning for the 8.6 acre MH -1 zoned tract off of Route 7 east of Winchester. I've attached a copy of our latest plan sheet along with 15 reduced scale sheets suitable for sending to the Planning Commissioners in their agenda package. The owner desires to develop this property into approximately 50 mobile home sites. Presently, by our count, there are 15 sites occupied on this project. We have put together the attached plan utilizing required buffers and dimensional requirements in the ordinance and it would appear that it will meet your regulations. One issue which must be decided early in the process by the Planning Commission is the allowability of private streets. As you know, the ordinance provides for private streets where they are a continuation of existing streets in MHA projects. This project is presently served by a 30' right-of-way connection with Route 7 and additional rights-of-way cannot be obtained for this project according to the owner. The first and major question is will the Planning Commission allow the extension of private streets allowed in accord with provisions in the ordinance. We look forward to meeting with you and the Commission on March 3 to further discuss this issue. cc: Mr. Rodney Franklin ff �� U 1� N!,, .I F 9 1993 � l Sincerely yours, 0.t . Maddox, Jr. .E., V.P. Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 77 �- 661 • V ,� • - iii / A. - r CIO Guo 1 6 i i ' • O „� f J` \6, ,_ 650 \ •/f ♦ \�5�� �7 %�K � ilns ��Vc{� 2a7 % V,\ Ii' . 662 � ✓ i' r. "8M bu o 6 �\ n 5 .tea°> ii S``^ r / \ t IN`fER \Ct B1 u• Vi )\\\` t ,,�� G j7 p M711 ( . %- 714 3 M \J�� .. _, �j �- �.\ 4' ✓ f • • � J . / 55p � J / � In , i p 656 \nom � ) \Ili � 3 50 el nn /' l'"�' t �- I •• \\. �� � �� r� �/�' .- `� �� low � - ` 650. `4uld Sqh ` 1rw 1• wage _ TC7.L$ i �� _ _ `--' Yr s l -uU 7 � ��- �%� ✓J _ ) e /U56 the estor ,y- 63s •,` �- el is Coun Club tiX % �H�.creen a \\t Ch V r/� Dense ny r7 '� _a SCti P Q) � r ;Greenwood ' '$eights_ w65. VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000' COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Directory%/ RE: Informal Discussion For Greenwood Partnership DATE: February 22, 1993 Mr. H. Bruce Edens, of Greenway Engineering, has requested time on the Planning Commission agenda of March 3, 1993 for an informal discussion regarding a proposed single family cluseter development on Greenwood Road. Attached for your information is a preliminary sketch of Greenwood Partnership. KCT/slk attachment 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 / 665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Planning Director(ni�i+% SUBJECT: Fire and Rescue Rezoning Impacts DATE: February 17, 1993 The staff has discussed the impact model, which measures the financial impact of rezonings on county facilities, with county fire and rescue officials. As originally provided, the model generally shows no impacts on fire and rescue facilities. This is due to the fact that fire and rescue impacts are different from the schools and parks impacts measured. The capital costs examined for schools and parks are totally funded through the county budget. However, fire and rescue capital costs are only partly funded from county contributions. As originally provided, the model only measures the impact of rezonings on the county budget in terms of county contributions for fire and rescue capital costs. An addendum to the model has been added by the staff which measures the new capital cost of rezonings which would not be paid for by county contributions. It is the opinion of the staff that these impacts which will be measured by the model are not excessive. They are in fact similar to the impacts that are reflected in the fire and rescue comments that we have been receiving. In general, the model projects fire and rescue capital impacts of $100 or less per new single family dwelling, depending on which fire and rescue districts are involved. It projects manufacturing and commercial impacts of less than $2.00 per square foot. The Code of Virginia allows for acceptance of cash proffers for facilities identified by the Capital Improvements Plan or for items not normally included in the CIP. It is the opinion of the staff that fire and rescue capital items are not normally included in the CIP in Frederick County and that proffers for these items could be accepted. Finally, it is the opinion of the staff that the impacts of rezonings on fire and rescue facilities that are not funded by the county contributions are impacts that should be addressed through the rezoning process. The staff would appreciate an opinion from the Planning Commission. We intend to also take this issue to the Board of Supervisors. 9 north Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 Page -2- Impacts Memo February 17, 1993 For informational purposes, the staff has enclosed the results of two hypothetical rezoning scenarios. One is a typical rezoning to Residential Performance for 52 single family homes on 18 acres and the other is a rezoning to Ml Light Industrial for a 500,000 square foot manufacturing facility and a 250,000 square foot warehouse facility on a 30 acre parcel. The residential rezoning scenario was set in the Stephens City Fire and Rescue District and the Clearbrook Fire and Rescue District was used for the manufacturing rezoning scenario. It is important to note that we have not received the 1992 information from the Fire and Rescue Department that is needed to update the impact model. Therefore the New Capital Costs Not Covered by County Contributions total found on the Output Module is based on 1990 information. Please contact me regarding any questions you might have prior to the Planning Commission meeting. RWW/slk enclosure RESIDENTIAL REZONING SCENARIO Involving 52 single family dwellings on an IS acre parcel Stephens City Fire and Rescue District INPUT MODULE All inputs go in column E. Cells with arrows <-- must be completed for the model to calculate correctly (zero is acceptable). For listing of school, fire and rescue district codes, please refer to cell G60. QUANTITI Fire Service District (Codes 1-10) 1 Rescue Service District (Codes 11-19) 1; Elementary School District (Codes 20-28) 21' Middle School District (Codes 29-31) 3C High School District (Codes 32-34) 3,' Total Acreage 1 E Office Gross Square Footage C Office Employment C Value per Office Square Foot $195.26 Retail Square Footage 0 Retail Employment 0 Value per Retail Square Foot $59.94 Restaurant Square Footage 0 Restaurant Employment 0 Value per Restaurant Square Foot $136.22 Service Station Square Footage 0 Service Station Employment 0 Value per Service Station Square Foot $173.21 Manufacturing Square Footage 0 Manufacturing Employment 0 Value per Manufacturing Square Foot $33.50 Warehouse Square Footage 0 Warehouse Employment 0 Value per Warehouse Square Foot $59.78 Hotel Rooms 0 Square feet per Hotel Room 225 Total Hotel Square Footage 0 Total Hotel Employment 0 Value per Hotel Square Foot $63.30 Number of Single Family Dwelling Units 52 Average Square Footage Per SF Dwelling Unit 2,500 Total Single Family Dwelling Unit SF 130,000 Average Value per SF Dwelling Unit $119,039 Elementary School Pupil Yield per SF Unit 0.156 Middle School Pupil Yield per SF Unit 0.060 High School Pupil Yield per SF Unit 0.119 Number of Townhouse Dwelling Units 0 Average Square Footage Per SF Dwelling Unit 1,800 Total Townhouse Dwelling Unit SF 0 Average Value per TH Dwelling Unit $63.703 Elementary School Pupil Yield per TH Unit 0.107 Middle School Pupil Yield per TH Unit 0.032 r� C= High School Pupil Yield per TH Unit 0.055 Number of Multi -Family Dwelling Units 0 Average Square Footage Per MF Dwelling Unit 1,100 Total Multi -Family Dwelling Unit SF 150 Average Value per MF Dwelling Unit $45,000 Elementary School Pupil Yield per MF Unit 0.048 Middle School Pupil Yield per MF Unit 0.014 High School Pupil Yield per MF Unit 0.019 Number of Mobile Home Units 0 Average Square Footage Per Mobile Home Unit 800 Total Mobile Home Unit SF 0 Average Value per Mobile Home $35,000 Elementary School Pupil Yield per Mobile Home 0.048 Middle School Pupil Yield per Mobile Home 0.014 High School Pupil Yield per Mobile Home 0.019 Average Household Size 2.72 Total Resident Population Expected 141 Total Employment Expected 0 Total Square Footage - All Land Uses 130,150 Total Residential Units 52 Total Residential Lots 52 Total Non -Residential Lots/Buildings 0 ---------- ---------- ---------- Stephens City Fire District Total Calls, 1990 Bldg SF Served Bldg. S.F. per Call Total Exponses Total D/S & Cap Costs Share to D/S, Cap Cost County Contribution Contrib-D/S, Cap Cost Total New Calls Cost per Call Total New Costs Portion-D/S, Cap Cost County Contrib/Call Co. Contrib/New Calls Co. Contrib for D/S, Cap Costs for New Calls -------------------- -- Stephens City Rescue District 306 Total Pop/Emp 7,933,750 Total Calls, 1990 25,927 Avg Pop/Emp per Call $34,763 Total Expenses $21,990 Total D/S & Cap Costs 63.26% Share to D/S, Cap Cost $11,644 County Contribution $7,365 Contrib-D/S, Cap Cost 5 Total New Calls $113.61 Cost per Call $570 Total New Costs $361 Portion-D/S, Cap Cost $38.05 County Contrib/Call $191 Co. Contrib/New Calls Co. Contrib for D/S, Cap $121 Costs for New Calls 11,929 576 21 $65,437 $41,392 63.26% $21,918 $13,864 7 $113.61 $773 $489 $38.05 $259 $164 -------------------- OUTPUT MODULE I ---------- I Capital I Costs I Fire Department $121 Rescue Department $164 Elementary Schools $67,748 Middle Schools $32,647 High Schools $120,121 Parks and Recreation I $31,039 I TOTAL ---------- ---------- $251,841 ---------- FIRE AND RESCUE ADDENDUM I I I New Capital Costs Not Covered by County Contributions ---------------- Net ---------- -- Credit for Fiscal Taxes to Impact Capital Net Credit Costs Impact $1,089 $0 $0 $0 $27,228 $1,089 ------- ---------- $686.11 $220,517 I $31,039 I $223,524 ---------- -- I I I I I I I ---------- -- MANUFACTURING REZONING SCENARIO 500,000 square feet of Manufacturing use 250,000 square feet of Warehouse use Total site area of 30 acres Clearbrook Fire and Rescue District INPUT MODULE All inputs go in column E. Cells with arrows <-- must be completed for the model to calculate correctly (zero is acceptable). For listing of school, fire and rescue district codes, please refer to cell G60. QUANTIT`r Fire Service District (Codes 1-10) 1 Rescue Service District (Codes 11-19) 11 Elementary School District (Codes 20-28) 2E Middle School District (Codes 29-31) 31 High School District (Codes 32-34) 32 Total Acreage 30 Office Gross Square Footage 0 Office Employment 0 Value per Office Square Foot $195.26 Retail Square Footage 0 Retail Employment 0 Value per Retail Square Foot $59.94 Restaurant Square Footage 0 Restaurant Employment 0 Value per Restaurant Square Foot $136.22 Service Station Square Footage 0 Service Station Employment 0 Value per Service Station Square Foot $173.21 Manufacturing Square Footage 500,000 Manufacturing Employment 833 Value per Manufacturing Square Foot $33.50 Warehouse Square Footage 250,000 Warehouse Employment 200 Value per Warehouse Square Foot $59.78 Hotel Rooms 0 Square feet per Hotel Room 225 Total Hotel Square Footage 0 Total Hotel Employment 0 Value per Hotel Square Foot $63.30 Number of Single Family Dwelling Units 0 Average Square Footage Per SF Dwelling Unit 2,500 Total Single Family Dwelling Unit SF 0 Average Value per SF Dwelling Unit $119,039 Elementary School Pupil Yield per SF Unit 0.156 Middle School Pupil Yield per SF Unit 0.060 High School Pupil Yield per SF Unit 0.119 Number of Townhouse Dwelling Units 0 Average Square Footage Per SF Dwelling Unit 1,800 Total Townhouse Dwelling Unit SF 0 Average Value per TH Dwelling Unit $_63,703 Elementary School Pupil Yield per TH Unit 0.107 Middle School Pupil Yield per TH Unit 0.032 High School Pupil Yield per TH Unit 0.055 Number of Multi -Family Dwelling Units 0 Average Square Footage Per MF Dwelling Unit 1,100 Total Multi -Family Dwelling Unit SF 150 Average Value per MF Dwelling Unit $45,000 Elementary School Pupil Yield per MF Unit 0.048 Middle School Pupil Yield per MF Unit 0.014 High School Pupil Yield per MF Unit 0.019 Number of Mobile Home Units 0 Average Square Footage Per Mobile Home Unit 800 Total Mobile Home Unit SF 0 Average Value per Mobile Home $35,000 Elementary School Pupil Yield per Mobile Home 0.048 Middle School Pupil Yield per Mobile Home 0.014 High School Pupil Yield per Mobile Home 0.019 Average Household Size 2.72 Total Resident Population Expected 0 Total Employment Expected 1,083 Total Square Footage - All Land Uses 750,150 Total Residential Units 0 Total Residential Lots 0 Total Non -Residential Lots/Buildings 2 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Clearbrook Fire District I Clearbrook Rescue District Total Calls, 1990 180 I Total Pop/Emp 12,445 Bldg SF Served 7,610,450 I Total Calls, 1990 322 Bldg. S.F. per Call 42,280 I Avg Pop/Emp per Call 39 Total Expenses $34,422 I Total Expenses $61,578 Total DIS & Cap Costs $19,169 I Total D/S & Cap Costs $34,291 Share to D/S, Cap Cost 55.69% I Share to D/S, Cap Cost 55.69% County Contribution $10,757 1 County Contribution $19,243 1 Contrib-D/S, Cap Cost 1 $5,990 1 Contrib-D/S, Cap Cost $10,716 Total New Calls 18 I 1 Total New Calls 28 Cost per Call $191.24 1 Cost per Call $191.24 1 Total New Costs $3,393 Total New Costs $5,360 1 Portion-D/S, Cap Cost $1,889 1 Portion-D/S, Cap Cost $2,985 1 County Contrib/Call $59.76 1 County Contrib/Call $59.76 1 Co. Contrib/New Calls $1,060 1 Co. Contrib/New Calls $1,675 1 Co. Contrib for D/S, Cap I Co. Contrib for D/S, Cap 1 Costs for New Calls I 1---------- ---------- $590 ---------- 1 Costs for New Calls I 1-------------------- $933 OUTPUT MODULE Fire Department Rescue Department Eiementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools Parks and Recreation TOTAL FIRE AND RESCUE ADDENDUM I I I New Capital Costs Not Covered by County Contributions ---------- ---------- ----- Capital Costs $590 $933 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,523 Net Fiscal Impact Credit $830,292 Credit for Taxes to Capital Costs $2,369 $0 $0 $2,369 $3,941.66 I I Net Impact I $0 $0 $0 $0 X11 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 703 /665-5651 Fax 703/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II k RE: 1993 Primary Road Improvement Plan. DATE: March 2, 1993 The Frederick County Transportation Committee reviewed the proposed 1993 Primary Road Improvement Plan during their March 1, 1993 meeting. The Transportation Committee recommended that this plan maintain the same priority as the 1992 Plan. The Transportation Committee also recommended that the 1993 Plan not include any new primary road projects. The 1993 Primary Road Improvement Plan has been forwarded to the Frederick County Planning Commission for review and comment. Route 522 South is currently funded on the Commonwealth Transportation Board's Six Year Improvement Program. This is the only project on the 1993 Plan that is funded by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). The recommendation by the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Frederick County Board of Supervisors on March 10, 1993. The Board of Supervisors will adopt a Primary Road Improvement Plan for Frederick County. The final plan will be presented to the Transportation Board on March 23, 1993 during VDOT's Preallocation Hearing. 9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601 Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604 1993 PRIMARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN 1) Route 522 South (East of Winchester) From: Route 50/17 East Intersection To: Route 277 East Intersection (North of Double Toll Gate) Improve to four lanes and provide intersection improvements as necessary to coordinate with Route 37 extension and Route 277 improvements. The improvements should begin at the southern end and proceed northward. 2) I-81/11 North/37/661 Intersection (North of Winchester) Implement corridor improvement plans resulting from 1inchesterArea Transportation Study to deal with immediate deficiencies. 3) Eastern By-pass/loop From: Route 37 North at Stephenson To: Route 37 South at Kernstown Plan, engineer, acquire necessary right-of-way, and construct a by-pass to provide future additional limited access arterial capacity east of Winchester. This is needed to accommodate planned land use and economic development in Eastern Frederick County. This will include long term solutions to interchange areas at I-81 /11 North/37/661 and I--81/11 South/37/642. 4) Route 277 (East of Stephens City) From: I-81/277/647 Intersection (South of Winchester) To: Route 340/522 South Intersection (East of Double Toll Gate) Improve the existing two lane road facility by widening and straightening immediately. Conduct detailed studies to determine future needs for four lane improvements and improvements to the I--81/11 South/277/647 intersection area. Page -2- 1992 Primary Road Improvement Plan 5) Route 11 (North and South of Winchester) A. Route 11 South From: Middle Road To: 37 Interchange Widen and improve to five lanes. B. Route 11 North From: Winchester City Limits To: 37 Intersection Widen and improve as necessary. 6) I-81 (East of Winchester) From: Stephenson Interchange To: Middletown Interchange Study and improve to six lanes between Winchester exits if necessary.