PC 02-17-93 Meeting AgendaAGENDA
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Old Frederick County Courthouse
Winchester, Virginia
FEBRUARY 17, 1993
7.00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) Bimonthly Report...........................................A
2) Committee Reports.........................................8
3) Citizen Comments .......................................... C
4) Master Development Plan #006-92 of James R. Wilkins, III for 86 townhouses
and 76 apartments. This property is located on the south side of Route 659
in the Shawnee District.
(Mr. Wyatt) ............................................... D
5) Discussion with Patton, Harris, Rust and Associates, regarding Prince
Frederick Office Park.
(Mr. Wyatt)................................................E
6) Discussion with David M. Smith, Jr., regarding a mulitplex residential
development in the Sunnyside area.
(Mr. Lilley) ................................................ F
7) Discussion with G. W. Clifford & Associates, regarding a proposed 250 unit
townhouse development off of Valley Mill Road.
(Mr. Tierney) .............................................. G
8) Discussion regarding the 1995 Functional Classification of Rural Routes.
(Mr. Wyatt) ............................................... II
9) 1992 Annual Report.
(Mr. Watkins) .............................................. I
10) Memo regarding the status of the Alternate Wastewater Treatment Study.
......................................................... J
11) Memo regarding Park and Recreation funding on other localities.
........................................................ K
12) Other.
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report
DATE: February 4, 1993
(1) Rezonings Pending:
(dates are
submittal
dates)
Twin Lakes
4/04/90
(Shaw)
(RA to B2/RP)
(2) Rezonings Approved: (dates are BOS meeting dates)
None
(3) Rezonings Denied: (dates are BOS meeting dates)
None
(4) Conditional Use Permits Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
John & Rachael Black 01/04/93 Gain Cottage Occupation
Catalog Sales
Ryland Homes 01/14/93 Opeq Off Premise Sign
(5) Conditional Use Permits Approved: (dates are approval dates)
Kenneth R. Heishman 1/27/93 Shaw Furniture Building
(6) Site Plans Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
Wheatlands Wastewater
Fac. 9/12/89
Opeq
Trmt.facil
Grace Brethren Church
6/08/90
Shaw
Church
Flex Tech
10/25/90
Ston
L t. industrial
Hampton Chase
12/18/90
Ston
S.F. & T.H.
Lake Centre
05/15/91
Shaw
Townhouses
Red Star Express Lines
05/24/91
Ston
Whse. Addition
Freeton
04/27/92
Opeq
Townhouses
Salvation Army
12/03/92
Ston
Ofc/Housing
2
Valley Proteins (rev) 12/16/92 Gain Industrial
Glaize Components 01/21/93 Shaw Mfg. Plant
Cracker Barrel 01/21/93 Shaw Restaurant/
Gift Shop
(7) Site Plans Approved: (dates are approval dates)
Potomac Edison 01/21/93 Ston Elec.Substation
Winchester Church of God 01/29/93 BkCk Church
(8) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
None
(9) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. Approval: (P/C approval
dates
Abrams Point, Phase I
6/13/90
Shawnee
Hampton Chase
02/27/91
Stonewall
Lake Centre
06/19/91
Shawnee
Fredericktowne Est.
10/16/91
Opequon
(sections 5, 6 and 7)
Coventry Courts
12/04/91
Shawnee
Senseny Glen
12/04/91
Shawnee
Freeton
05/20/92
Opequon
Deer Run of Sherando
08/19/92
Opequon
Henry Business Park
02/03/93
Stonewall
(10) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
James R. Wilkins III 11/02/92 Shawnee
Prince Frederick Business Park 01/19/93 Shawnee
(11) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: (dates are BOS-approval
dates
Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back Creek
Hampton Chase (revised) 05/27/92 Stonewall
(12) FMDP Administ. Approved (dates are admin. approval dates)
None
3
(13) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pending•(submit dates)
David Walker
Donald Stotler
Jerry Bain
01/21/93
Shaw
15'
rear/house
01/21/93
Gain
Lot
size
01/22/93
BkCk
161front/garage
(14) BZA Applications Approved• (approval dates)
None
(15) BZA Applications Denied•
None
(16) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER
None
E. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #26
1. Corridor Appearance
The Chamber of Commerce Corridor Appearance Task Force
has refined their recommendations document and is in the process of
developing visual aids to illustrate their recommendations.
2. Site Plan Reviews
Evan Wyatt conducted the following site plan reviews:
On January 19, met with George Fourd of Patton Harris
Rust & Associates to discuss requirements associated with the
proposed Prince Frederick Office Park. This site is located on the
south side of Route 50 East, adjacent to Carper's Valley Country
Club.
On January 20, conducted a site inspection at Sherando
High School to allow for a temporary occupancy permit.
On January 22, met with Robert Nichols of Lee Builders to
discuss proposed improvements to the McDonalds restaurants located
on Route 647 and Route 11 North.
On January 25, discussed site plan requirements with
representatives from the National Wildlife Federation for a
proposed addition to the former American Woodmark Warehouse located
on Tyson Drive in the Stonewall Industrial Park.
On January 28, participated 'in a Technical Review
Committee meeting to discuss a proposal to develop mini -warehouse
storage units behind Ace Plaza along Stickley Drive.
On January 28, conducted a site inspection at Hershey
Pasta located on Park Center Drive in the Fort Collier Industrial
Pa-rk.
3. Stephens City Joint Plannina Grou
The staff is continuing to develop base information for
this group to consider for land use planning. The staff is also
continuing to work on mutually -agreeable boundary adjustments with
Stephens City.
4. Historic Resources Advisory Board
Members are preparing for a joint work session on
February 22 with the Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission.
The work session will be geared towards presenting the completed
inventory of historic resources in the County and discussing ways
of preserving such resources.
5. Civil War Heritage Tourism Committee
Bob Watkins attended the Lord Fairfax Planning District
Commission's Civil War Heritage Tourism Committee meeting.
6. Geographic Information System (GIS)
Bob Watkins attended an open forum on GIS in Staunton
held by the Commission on Population Growth and Development.
7. House Numbering/911 System
Staff is continuing with the update of the House
Numbering Project through the use of ACAD11, dBase IV, and general
inquiry.
8. Professional Development
On January 19, Kris Tierney attended a seminar at Lord
Fairfax Community College on Performance Evaluation. The seminar
was jointly sponsored by the Community College, the Lord Fairfax
PDC, Shenandoah University, and George Mason University Center for
Professional Development. Jeffrey Bradwine, J.D., Assistant Vice
President for Human Resources and Associate Professor at George
Mason was the instructor.
9. Route 642
On January 21, Kris Tierney met with VDOT's Robert Ryder
(right-of-way acquisition) and Bill Bushman, and the County
Attorney, Larry Ambrogi, to discuss the status of the Route 642
realignment project and coordinate the necessary steps to be taken.
10. Alternative Wastewater Treatment Studv
On January 22, Kris Tierney met with Rob Kinsley of the
Lord Fairfax PDC and Ed Strawsnyder to review submissions from
engineering firms responding to a request for qualifications for
conducting a evaluation of cost effective alternative wastewater
treatment methods for the Rural Community Centers of Round Hill,
Clearbrook and Brucetown.
On January 28, Kris interviewed three prospective firms
to conduct the above study. This evaluation is being done as part
of the ongoing study and is funded through 205J grant money.
11. Land Use Proposals
Xris Tierney has been involved in the following land use
discussions:
On January 20, met with Chuck Maddox and David Smith to
discuss the possible use of a four -acre parcel (zoned RP) in
Sunnyside for multiplex units. Mr. Smith is pursuing this
potential development.
On January 21, met with Steve Gyurisin to discuss the
possible rezoning of a 30+ acre parcel of land from RA to RP. The
property is located just south of Jamesway Plaza.
On January 29, met with Graham Nelson and a client interested
in the possible rezoning of a small parcel of land on Route 522
North from RA to B2 for boat sales.
P/C Review Date: 12/16/92
P/C Review Date: 02/17/93
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
#006-92
JAMES R. WILKINS, III DEVELOPMENT
Apartments and Townhouses
LOCATION: On the south side of Route 659
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 54000020000100
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned R -P (Residential Performance)
land use - vacant
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned R -P (Residential
Performance), Land use - residential, vacant and school
PROPOSED USE: 86 townhouses and 76 apartments
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation• See attached letter from W.
H. Bushman to Bruce Edens dated August 14, 1992. Also, the
revised location of the northern entrance on Route -658 does
not appear to meet minimum commercial offset requirements to
the Route 659 intersection
Fire Marshal: See attached comments from the Fire Marshal to
Greenway Engineering dated January 26, 1993.
Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 309, Use
Group R-2 (Residential Use) of the BOCA National Building
Code/1990. Other codes that apply are title 24, Code of
Federal Regulation, Chapter I Fair housing accessibility
F5
guidelines. (ADA requirement for Use Group R-2, Apartment R-3
townhouses are exempt.
Sanitation Authorit)L: Second review - two items - approved as
noted.
Parks and Recreation: See attached comments dated January 4,
1993.
County Engineer: Indicate on Master Plan that design and
construction of stormwater management facilities will be
required as part of Phase I development.
Planning & Zoning: The proposed apartment and townhouse
development is a permitted use in the RP (Residential
Performance) Zoning District. The applicant plans to develop
76 apartment units and 86 townhouse units on an 18.68 acre
parcel. This creates a gross density of 8.67 units per acre.
Any Master Development Plan (MDP) containing less than twenty-
five (25) acres is permitted to have a maximum gross density
of ten (10) units per acre.
The original Master Development Plan (MDP) associated with
this project was scheduled for Planning Commission review on
December 16, 1992. The staff report expressed concerns with
seven (7) specific issues at that time. The following staff
report relates how those issues have been addressed at this
time:
1) Multifamily Lot Requirements - The original MDP had three
(3) townhouse rows that exceeded the requirement of all
multifamily lots being within five hundred (500) feet of a
state -maintained road as measured along the access route. The
revised MDP meets this requirement.
2) Road Efficiency Buffers - The applicant has provided a
continuous landscaped road efficiency buffer of eighty (80)
feet along Route 659 (Valley Mill RQad). Staff will ask VDOT
to verify that the road efficiency buffer is designed
correctly to insure that it will not be disturbed when Route
659 is improved.
3) Transportation Issues - The applicant has provided a
twenty-five (25) foot strip to be dedicated for improvements
to Route 659 (Valley Mill Road). Staff will ask VDOT to
determine if this is adequate.
The applicant liar irid�cated that Rcute 658 (Brookland Lane)
will be improved to the end of the property.
The sixty (60) foot undeveloped right-of-way indicated on the
3
MDP is for the purpose of providing a connection between
Little River Drive and Route 658. According to VDOT, Little
River Drive was not developed into a cul-de-sac to allow for
this connection.
4) Steep Slopes - The original MDP proposed thirty-four
(340) percent disturbance of areas defined as steep slope.
The applicant has redesigned the entire layout of this plan
and has indicated that twenty-one (210) percent of the steep
slope area will be disturbed. The applicant needs to include
the amount of steep slope area on the townhouse portion that
will be disturbed as a result of extending sanitary sewer
through this area.
5) Phasing - The revised MDP indicates phasing for the
development.
6) Total Development Specifications - The proposed Master
Plan needs to indicate information regarding the total
development. This information needs to include the proposed
number of dwelling units, the approximate acreage in common
open space, housing type, right-of-way, and environmentally
sensitive land, as well as the amount and percentage of
environmentally sensitive land that will be disturbed.
7) Review Agency Comments - Comments made by the Virginia
Department of Transportation, Parks and Recreation, and the
County Engineer need to be addressed at the Master Plan stage.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 12/16/92 PC MTG • Approval provided the
applicant revises the Master Development Plan to address staff
comments and all review agency comments.
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS OF 12/16/92• Tabled
unanimously for thirty days. (Absent - T. Shenk)
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 2/17/93 PC MTG • Approval provided that
the applicant revises the Master Development Plan to address staff
comments and all review agency comments.
CO 01
RAY D. PETHTEL
COMMISSIONER
Mr. H. Bruce Edens, C.L.S.
C/O Greenway, Inc.
1104 Baker Lane
Winchester, VA 22601
Dear Bruce:
OLVAHIMFNF Gr THANJYOHTATION
P O BOX 218
E:.IINbUti U. )2.U24
AUauJ[ 14, 1992
Rcf: James R. Wilkins Apai u,Iu„t/"1'uwu1iuu�,C 1'rk.jj+:4.a
& t)59
1=rcderl;;� Cu,:uiy
We have reviewed the above referenced proJCc['s prc1limilary 111I1�Lcr deVC10p111e11L )LUI
June 10, 1992. Overall we have no objections to the propuscJ devc1upnlcnt of tt[is Pru1x;lLy.
However, we do offer the following; general comments:
1. A right-of-way dedication to Frederick County will ii"d to be nludu to cuvcr uw
proposed improvements to Routes 658 and 659.
2. The existing utilities may need to be relocated and the embaat"'mela reuluvc:d
along Route 659 to provide for the proposed road widening a11d to ub[aul
minimum sight distance at the commercial enLran,x.
3. The existing grade of RuuLc 6521 may nL,eJ to be adju�icd to obtain mimmum sight
distance at lie proposed cuu1111ercial enL1-WWe luCatiorls.
Before malting any final comments, we will require a complete set of site pians, dr;'u1L4 C'
calculations and traffic flew data from the T E Tri) G,.!iicr�ttion til ,n ; 11 Fo 11 til ! ii �r1 i0.r
review.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, plca5c lct me 1c11ow.
RBC/rf
Enclosures
xc: Mr. R. W. Watkins
Sincerely,
William H. Bushinan
Trans. Resident Engineer
By: Robert B. Childress
Hwy. Permits d„ Subd. Spee. Senior
THANSrUHrATION tOH THE 2 1 S I 4ENTUhY
IN
,!O-�TY OF FREMRICK, VIRGINIA
FIRE MARSHAL'S OFFICE
LAND DEVEL�PMEWT COMME�TS
Type of Application Master Development Current Zoning RP
1st Due Fire Co. 18 1st Due Rescue Co. 18
RECOMMENDATIONS
Automatic Sprinkler Evstem Residential Sprinkler System X
tomatic Fire Alarm System Other
Emergency Vehicle Access;
Adequate X Inadequate
Fire Lanes Required; Yes X
Comments: Same as 7/7/92.
Not Identified
N,--
Not
o
Not Identified
No
'''//; JAN
''�1
GREENWAY ENGINEERING
WILKINS APAR'T'MENTS
JANUARY 26, 1993
1. Designated emergency access lanes must be 20' in width - Show
same: on site pian.
2. Special hazards noted - Many buildings (apartments) have no
access to the rear. In order to facilitate ladder rescue
keep face of apartment buildings a maximum of 50' from
centerline of fir` lane or parking- lot travel lane. - Show
salve on site
plan.
3. Access to buildings, with parking as shown, will make access
Very difficult for ambulance crews. Carrying stretchers and
equipment between parked cars is difficult and carrying a
patient on a stretcher bac'.k, to the unit can compromise
patient care. Utilization of handicap ramps and hydrant
islands can help alleviate this problem. - Show same on
site plan.
4. Some hydran� adjustments may be necessary and will be
addressed on site plan.
When site Plans are submitted, please try tC, show eave
heights on apartment buildings and any townhouse having more
than two stories above grade.
6. I would like the opportunity to meet with developer to
discuss residential sprinkler systems for apartment units.
Having a time proven life safety system such as sprinklers
within the dwelling units would reduce the concern for rear
access: via ladders and ensure a much greater level of fire
life safety to occupants.
7. During construction of this project, place temporary street
signs and address signs on buildings for identification.
Access for emergency vehicles must be maintained at all times
during construction.
Burning of construction debris is not permitted on site.
All construction safety measures, as established in the
B.O.C.A. Building Code, Virginia State Fire Prevention Code,
and Frederick County Ordinances must be adhered to at all
times.
8. Based on population to call ratios of 19'0 and 1991,
Frederick County Fire and Rescue units can anticipate 45
calls per year to this project. This figure is for fire
dept. planning purposes.
ZEQUEST r OR MASTER DEVELiDPtj .k4,2 PLnr!
Frederick County Parks and Rccrc�ation
Attn: Di.rrctor of Parkas "nd RacrW.Ation "
P.O. Bax 601
Winchester, Va. 22601
(703) 665-567a
The Frederick County Parks and Recreation DCpartment= i5 locsz:ec; cii
the second floor of the Frederick County Administration Huilui.ty,
9 Court Square, Winchester, if you preier to hand aalivGr tns
review form.
Applicant's name, address and phony user:
is 4- '� .�
Name of development and/or description of the rcquezat:
Location:
All
AUA.AFs tIF
Parks & Recreation Dept. Comments:
See Attached
Parks Signature and Date:
(NOTICE TO PARKS -- PLEASE7CE
URN THIS FOFZi+� O HE APDL runt. J
NO TO APPLICANT
It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as
possible in order to assist the agency with their review. t.ao,
please attach a copy of your plans and/or application fora.
Master Development Plan
James R. Wilkins III
Apartment/Townhouse Project
January 4, 1993
Parks & Recreation Dept. Comments:
1. Master Plan appears to meet open space requirements.
2. Size and specifications for picnic shelter must be provided before we can
consider it as being a recreational unit. Staff recommends that the shelFvr
have a concrete deck and be at least 400 sq. ft. A specific number of picnic
tables and grills should also be required at each shelter.
3. All recreation areas must be accessible and meet Americans with
Disabilities Act requirements.
4. Absorbent material, meeting the United States Consumer Products Safety
Commission Standards, must be used under all playground equipment.
5. Staff recommends that there be some variation in playground equipment
between the different tot lot areas.
6. Providing only two tot lot areas in the townhouse phase is fine as long as
there is equipment provided equivalent to three recreational units.
7. Site plan must show how recreational equipment, including protective
areas, fit into the space provided.
8. Please note the amount of usable open space on plan.
APPLICATION
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Frederick County
Virginia
Date- Application -9
(Please list the names or all owners or parties in interest)
APPLICANT /AGENT:
Address:
1
Daytime Phone Number •
DESIGNER/DESIGN COMPANY:
AEOVE-
Address:
Phone Number
Contact Name 14
rte►
7
PRELIMINARY MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
CHECKLIST
The following checklist is intended to assist the applicant in
insuring that all required information is provided or is available
to allow review by the County.
This form must be completed by the applicant and submitted with tna
preliminary master development plan. All required items must b4
provided on the PMDP.
Background In formation:
1. Development's name: f;z W. Wi t2 3
2. Location of property:t7QLn4_
3. Total area of property:
4. Property ID # (14 Digit)
5. Property zoning and present use
6. Adjoining property zoning and present use:
8. Magisterial District:
9. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan?
original®!' Amended
8
General Information:
1. Have the following items been incluaed?
North arrow
Yes ✓
No
Scale
Yes
No
Legend
Yes
Noes
Boundary Survey
Yes_,
No
Total Area
Yes
No
Topography
Yes ✓
No�
Project Title
Yes L/No
Preparation and Revision Date
Yes—;�r
No
Applicant's Signed
yes
No
Consent Statement
2. Number of phases proposed? Z
3. Are the proposed phases shown on the plaster Development Plan?
Yes 000' No
4. Are the uses of adjoining properties clearly designated?
Yes 4;.� No
5. Is an inset map provided showing the location of the project
and all public roads within 2,000 feet.
Yes ✓' No
6. Are all land uses clearly shown? Yes ✓ No
7. Are environmental features clearly shown?
Yes 1 No
8. Describe the following environmental features:
Total Area o Disturbed Acres in
(Acres) by development Open Space
Floodplains o
Lakes and ponds
Natural retention
areas p
Steep slopes
(15% or more) Z 4G , 34% /I 4-14C
Woodlands _C -It
Q
9. Are the following shown on the master development plan?
Street layout Yes ! No
Entrances Yes No
Parking areas Yes No
Utilities (mains) Yes No
10. Has a conceptual stormwater management plan been provided?
Yes ` No
11. Have all historical structures been identified?
Yes No h/�q
Residential Uses
If the Master Development Plan includes any land zoned RP,
(Residential Performance) or any residential uses, the following
items should be completed.
I. What numbers and types of housing are proposed?
2. Is a schedule provided describing each of the following in each
phase:
Open space acreage Yes ✓ No
Acreage in each housing type Yes No
Acreage in streets and right of ways Yes No ✓
Total acreage Yes .i No
Number of dwellings of each type Yes_N0
3. What percentage of the total site is to be placed in common open
space? j O , 3 AG.
10
4. Are recreational facilities required? Yes ✓ No
5. What types of recreational facilities are proposed?
6. Are separation buffers required? Yes --' No
7. Are road efficiency buffers required? Yes No .--
8. Are landscaping or landscaped screens required?
Yes No
9. Are required buffers, screens, and landscaping described by
the plan with profiles or examples? Yes No
11
ADJOINING PROPER'T'Y OWNERS
Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the putji,
hearing. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is a,
property abutting the requested property on the side or racer or ur
property directly across a road from the requested property. T11
applicant is required to obtain the following information on eaL-
adjoining property including the 14 digit tax parcel identitication nuu�t
which maybe obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Ravcnuu.
NAME
_ LA6 E301 ) N C.
ROY L. ;�uVOLPH
Address P 0. SOX 40, S1J5PNEI46 617Y, VA . 2255
Property IDO r�00000 200600000000 �D
Address 3103 VAU_eYAVE. W1NC. 11A. 22(,01
Property ID,i 54-00000 Z000o00000o030
130 VI/MAM T�UCICIA161 Co. Address P . PDX 05%8 11V/AIC. VA . ZZ(aO )
FRED L. G LA I Z F
1=R6DGR1Ck .Co
CCARKE , Co,
�UM,WA/ t/EAG T1-1
Property ID# 154 2 �
Address/4-15 .4,L ,,;�7-Sr.
Property ID#
Address�ILJILEi /tel/CL .�A.C. 1,4 _ 22lvUJ
Property IDJ 4 //2)"
Address pd 80.4' ZZa9 SrAllslrari/
Property ID# , 4
i
Address 3Z )5E5YTCW 577. WIlvd . tl14.
Property ID# 5¢1r 1,30
6E77}/ 4NN 5A,- fyac Address /4 J2 1��ILL�Y�/%/LL �D• 1t/f�tlC. !/A. 22(0/
Property ID# rza. 1 �� / _ X70
Address ,,�/C 38 BOX /zZlo l-ff�rC Ifs . MCI
Property ID,¢ 54_r %(a0
�O�crAGD lit% QGZ�fN50�/
Address er• 3 B0X(o20%-P.�YYrLL
Property ID,
13
NAME
Q�V �2E'lrc� T
12�44&6e/44N
Address /-�94/06
r vY C r L y l 64-1 % ------ �Q
Address 14 0 YAttgY 6�1LL Rb, 1,t/
C• i�Ls• /
JEFFRFY 64R6ou
Property ID,# E-_ ! ! 30 +
fAddress (LIZ VAL.EY M'U, iD• 1� wc. vA • ZZ&41 I,
LSA RI.AN D L , 51.1 � � -1RY ....
Property ID, —'
54 = 1 17.0
AddressK5NNC-T-4 M. �aJvj3�r fir.
Property ID,# 54_Z �
Address
�? JoI.�N /J UG 38 Boy, IZ?� Jvj>JC. VA
'-=i1aWC40LA Property ID# 54-1:
100 I
Address 2225 VAL 5Y Q V e, WINC . VA • ZZvvlo
�N7��tS Property IDm
Address
13Z4 114 UCy MIU,'FD i u is . VA • Z 6Gr I
bO���D r4NSE Property ID#,4-2 — i -7G
Address a i , i, , 1 I , , �!
14
Property ID,#r
50
DONALD L- Ll C14L►TC-a
Address 14-00
VaUFY MILL RD, G, VA. z(rD1
Property ID#
VkLIAM J • AVTOi4
Address 13�Z
Va•LL EY M 1 LL
IZD_ bV1NG, 0. �'O!
Property IDr
V4U-eY M02TQAC4E
Address moo YAug 4Vr—.
W/�tC l/4 2Z�D1
lI�iVC-STME�l7- Go2P
Property ID#
L�,LkINs L VA. CoRp.
Address S+ovTl-J Lov,povn� 67. r�/C• 1�:�1 2 /
Property ID#
� 10
14
NAME
Jal��s T;
Address 2023 V4tLC-Y 4VE. UVIVC• IA. ZZicol
Property ID,# 54 2
Address 15Z4 -FA12k519E PR. �VlNe- VA
Property IDj�l 64_13 ? Z
E144Address
2(84- 1:�Z:). witic Vim- Z,ZvO}
Property ID, 54 r3 2Address
�W�10
Property JD,�5413 2 2 46�
JOAN E . i`A�( LpR
kAddpress 1518 PAR1�S(DO M. W)r4G. VA . C�GitJUI
oerty IDS
54-6
PLS R OLD C,. (4- 20(4 AN
Address 7301 I bYLBRCOk CT. FA(..(,S C140P-C44 V,q 4
Property IDS .54p3 z Z op
14ErZI3E2r , '�s��u
Address 1514 �A2i�Sibt: D;Z. to imc. V4, ZZwil
Property ID,�
B Z z 51
J A� �(�� 11
GPFR�y L' �' �'QI.L
Address 151 ? FAR.kSIDE D2, imC.- A ZZ�c01 l
Property IDi 5413 z z 5 Z O
Address ISl17 PAZkkZSI E T�k. j/ jw-, .V
Property IDS _. Z __-- Z ---30
J
Address
Address 375 1416A4Ne: Op/ T
Property ID#
ROBGRT UJ, -5,mM 7u5
Address 2,5 j YFr CT. S7EP14C-N5 C+r! V4, 22 55
Property IDrt ;5,4 - 2 F ------- D
Address I rJ�
� 4 l�s,� v� . �,� c . �
Property IDS
14
NAME
ii Address Col(, N, AVE. CWARj.07T&SVjaC- VA ZZ110!
E(. }-r . �Qij[��,i� Property IDS
54[3 Z ------ z 570
Address 150, PARkSIPF . WiAX, VA • Z06CI
�N IS -�•
MA"-,( Property ID,� 54 B Z 2 -
Address Address
Property 1D,�
Address
Property ID#
Address
Property ID,#
Address
Property ID#
Address
Property IDJ
Address
Property IDo
Address
Property ID,#
Address
Property ID#
Address
Property ID#
Address
Property ID,}
14
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner H
RE: Prince Frederick Office Park Master Development Plan
DATE: February 2, 1993
Mr. John Hash, Mr. George Foard, and Mr. Carl Rinker of Patton Harris Rust & Associates
have requested an opportunity to informally discuss the above referenced site plan with the full
Planning Commission. This site is located in the Shawnee Magisterial District on the south side
of Route 50 East, approximately 1/2 mile east of the intersection with Route 522 South. The
total site area is 91.903 acres and is currently zoned B-2 Business General District. One item
of interest associated with this Master Development Plan regards the provision of through roads
from this site to the Winchester Regional Airport Authority site and the Donald E. Garber site.
Staff believes that these connections are necessary to provide a suitable transportation network
for this area.
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester. Virginia - 22601
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning Commissioners
FROM: Ronald A. Lilley, Planner II�
SUBJECT: Informal Discussion of Smith Concept Plan (Sunnyside Area)
DATE: February 2, 1993
Attached is a copy of a letter from David M. Smith, Jr. requesting an informal discussion of his
concept plan for a multiplex residential development in the Sunnyside area. A copy of the plan
is attached for Planning Commissioners (there are not enough copies for others who receive this
agenda).
The plan shown would need variances from the normal Road Efficiency Buffer requirement of
80' and from the setback requirement of 20' from parking areas/driveways. Though not labeled
on the plan, the parking areas proposed are in the form of circular driveways. Before
requesting these variances from the Board of Zoning Appeals, the applicant would like to get
your reaction to his proposal. The concept is to have condominium -type ownership of the
property, rather than to divide the property into individual lots requiring a road built to state
standards. Also, the Subdivision Ordinance restriction on the length of an access route from a
state -maintained road (500') is exceeded in this plan.
I am available for whatever questions you may have about this.
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester. VirLyinia - 22601
F jI-L 0r�-, --2, /55&
Jbcur- PICLI)nir)c �C�C>7i'711SS/0�1
� rvcalci t1k)e 1� f'�r��,iE�+ rc�� in-�irl7ccr hec�ri�tc�� � bui��rnC'
1170 1 anq C'mSiClEri � j�
-�z r' Fr((Ieri�k Cuunit . f�llhovh
� � �� �� the. rc►
[r/?(s j4ciz (Ire a
Cit! prablel-rSs Ma/1.0 -M /)c oar frrs��d �� l � ' � �.
r�e C( -,a pr6cec
be i � ve �oa h'i(/ k-I)d YkIcar�� j
Pi's IdIn a rdable ha �r� v a tjily l?y ,� - o� our
> >r
P�Cr�er��
So�f�f� �'��'rIe�i . 1c�a, 'r����c i'Cl
rehraaty /7,
of -
�JAM
� 103 104 105 ^� 118 119 12o Smith Pra
'� ttb 31 -----
106 .= RL 1310 - - 32
1pI NO 113
B 108 p � 124 123 12Z
�r id 125 126
4 2d 1?7 14 ?a
34
19 1-10 1 33A RP Zoning
? 3 # 3 10 132 lay 1ad
�f
12 12
27 d W.
8 4 1 7 ryt' fj3a
J s rjr2
14C
??
B-2 Zoning a , S 4� 4:4 As frc
? 4
3
Z Aa
�a se
0 Ab
e 4
e
a 4 • Q; a da 45,11p r?�
s
S �" rg r ?►�' 8 ad
8 r3 3 wd r 3 r?
rJ d • +? J d b
a 7'e ± a s�
.10
e
s �
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Director
Re: Informal Discussion; Hillsdale Estates MDP
Date: February 2, 1993
G.W. Clifford and Associates have requested an informal discussion regarding a proposed
250 unit townhouse development on a 32+- acre parcel off of Valley Mill Road. This parcel
adjoins the Wilkins tract (to the south) which is currently being considered for apartment
and townhouse units.
A sketch is attached which shows the proposed layout of the development along with its
relationship to surrounding parcels.
KCT/slk
attachment
9 Court Square - P.O. Box 601 - Winchester. VirEinia - 22601
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703 / 665-5651
Fax 703/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner R IfL
RE: 1995 Functional Classification of Rural Routes in Frederick County.
DATE: February 2, 1993
The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) has completed their comprehensive review
of all state routes within Virginia. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) has directed
the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) to update the functional classification for
urban and rural routes throughout the state.
VDOT has provided Frederick County with a copy of the 1995 Functional Classification Plan.
This plan is part of the state's planning effort, and is in conjunction with the Intermodal Surface
Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). ISTEA has authorized the development of a National
Highway System (NHS). The purpose of the NHS is to provide an interconnected system of
principal arterial routes which will serve major population centers. Interstate 81 and Route 7
will be the only principal arterial routes within Frederick County that will be part of the NHS.
Staff has included a list of primary and secondary routes that have been reclassified from
VDOT's 1990 Functional Classification Plan, and a copy of the 1992 Frederick County
Functional Classification Plan. Staff asks that the, Planning Commission provide a
recommendation regarding this plan following review and discussion.
9 North Loudoun Strect P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604
S'L'ATE ROUTES RECLASSIELED
ROUTE
1990 PLAN
1995 PLAN
127
Minor Arterial
Major Collector
600 (611 to 608)
Local
Minor Collector
608 (south of 50)
Major Collector
Minor Collector
644 (522 to 50)
Major Collector
Local
645
Minor Collector
Major Collector*
672
Major Collector
Minor Collector
728
Local
Major Collector*
803
Major Collector
Minor Collector
* These road segments were upgraded by VDOT to create a Major Collector network around
the Winchester Regional Airport.
VARIATIONS FROM FREDERICK COUNTY
FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION PLAN
ROUTE
11N
11S
50E
50W
127
259
522S
600 (689-690)
600 (612-790)
608 (50W-679)
608 (612-616)
627 (IIS -Warren Co.)
636 (277-642)
644 (522S -50E)
659
661 (663-671)
671 (739-654)
672 (11 N-667)
672 (739-654)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Major Arterial
Major Arterial
Major Arterial
Major Arterial
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Major Arterial
Minor Collector
Local
Local
Local
Minor Collector
Major Collector
Minor Collector
Minor Collector
Major Collector
Local
Major Collector
Minor Collector
1995 VDOT PLAN
Major Collector
Major Collector
Minor Arterial
Minor Arterial
Major Collector
Major Collector
Minor Arterial
Local
Minor Collector*
Minor Collector*
Minor Collector*
Major Collector*
Local
Local
Local
Minor Collector
Minor Collector*
Minor Collector
Local
ROUTE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1995 VDOT PLAN
672 (667-668)
Major Collector
Local
673 (739-663)
Minor Collector
Local
701 (522N-700)
Major Collector
Minor Collector
723 (50E -Clarke Co.)
Local
Major Collector*
739 (673-671)
Major Collector
Minor Collector
761 (664 -Clarke Co.)
Local
Major Collector*
803
Local
Minor Collector*
* Indicates road segments that have been upgraded by the 1995 VDOT Plan.
COUN'T'Y of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703 / 665-5651
Fax 703/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
To: Members of the Planning Commission
From: Lanny Bise, Planner I C c'G
Subject: 1992 Annual Report
Date: February 3, 1993
Enclosed please find your copy of the 1992 Frederick County Department of Planning and
Development Annual Report (Non Planning Commission Members will not have a copy in
their agendas, they will be available once approved by the Commission). This report
contains information concerning the state of the County, current planning issues,
development and land use proposals that were approved, and planning progress during the
previous year.
The staff respectfully submits the annual report for your review and approval and looks
forward to hearing any questions or comments you might have.
Feel free to contact me regarding any questions you might have prior to the meeting.
LCB/slk
enclosure
9 North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601
Winchester, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 22604
To
From:
Re:
COiJiNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703 / 665-5651
Fax 703/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission Members
Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Planning Director
Status of Alternate Wastewater Treatment Study of Clearbrook/Brucetown and
Roundhill Community Centers
Date: February 1, 1993
Board and Planning Commission Members will recall that the county planning staff, in
conjunction with the Planning District Commission and the local office of the State Health
Department, conducted a septic system survey of the Roundhill and Clearbrook/Brucetown
Community Centers over the past summer and early fall. The survey was part of a study which
is being funded in part by an EPA grant. The effort began with public meetings held during the
spring in both areas to alert the residents of the upcoming survey and explain the purpose and
methodology.
Surveys were completed for just over 50% of the residences in each of the two areas surveyed.
The survey results were forwarded to the Health Department and reports were produced for each
area. (We can make copies of the report for any interested members.) The reports conclude that
there is reason for concern over ground water contamination in both study areas. These
conclusions are based primarily on three observations. First, both areas have a high percentage
of soils that are rated as being severely limited for on-site septic tanks and absorption fields.
Nearly 100% of the soils in the Clearbrook/Brucetown study area and 50% of those in the
Roundhill area are rated as severely limited. Second, the majority of systems present in both
study areas are over 15 to 20 years old. Finally, a third Qf the properties surveyed had limited
or no area available to replace or repair a failing system.
A Technical Advisory Committee was established to oversee the study plans and to hire a
consultant with a portion of the grant funds. Requests for a submission of qualifications were sent
to 20 firms in and around Virginia. Seven firms responded to the request and three were
interviewed on January 28. The firm of P. M. Brooks Associates, out of Powhatan, was
selected. The consultant will be asked to evaluate the information gathered in the survey from
an engineering standpoint and put together a cost analysis for various alternate treatment systems
that might be applied in the study areas.
O North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601
Winchcster, VA 22601 Winchester, VA 226("
Page 2
Alternate Wastewater Treatment Study
February 1, 1993
The final product of the study will be a report from the consultant that includes possible
institutional arrangement(s) for installation and operation and maintenance of the recommended
system(s). The grant period is scheduled to run through March of 1993 although an extension
through September 30 has been requested.
KCT/rsa
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703/665-5651
FAX 703/667-0370
MEMORANDUM
To: Planning Commission Members
From: Lanny Bise, Planner I Lc6
Subject: Parks and Recreation Funding In Other Localities.
Date: February 1, 1993
Per your request, the staff has checked with neighboring localities to ascertain what
percentage of their total Capital Improvements Plan budget is being allocated toward Parks
and Recreation facilities.
In the proposed fiscal year 1993-94 Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan, 11.5% of
the total proposed capital outlays are going toward Parks and Recreation projects. Listed
below is a table showing how Frederick County compares to other local jurisdictions:
I hope you have found this information helpful. Please let me know if I can be of any other
assistance.
LCB/slk
9 Court Square - P Ca Ro-V X01 _ W,i,e-hpvtp - V;vim;";" _ 1)1)4n f
% of total CIF Budget
FLocality
County
11.5%
chester
4%
Clarke County
.003%
Warren County
No CIP.
Fauquier County
No Parks Projects
in Current CIP.
Loudoun County
17%
Shenandoah County
E6.7% of Capital Outlay
Budget. No CIP.
I hope you have found this information helpful. Please let me know if I can be of any other
assistance.
LCB/slk
9 Court Square - P Ca Ro-V X01 _ W,i,e-hpvtp - V;vim;";" _ 1)1)4n f