HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC 02-03-93 Meeting Agenda�.JRE COPY
AGENDA P'�YA/n
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Old Frederick County Courthouse
Winchester, Virginia
FEBRUARY 3, 1993
7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) Meeting Minutes of January 6, 1993 ............................. A
2) Monthly and bimonthly reports ................................. B
3) Committee Reports ........................................ C
4) Citizen Comments .......................................... D
5) Subdivision application #001-93 of Kim Henry, Henry Business
Park, for four lots. This property is located at the intersection
of Baker Lane and Fort Collier Road, in the Stonewall District.
(Mr. Miller) ............................................... E
7:30 PM PUBLIC HEARINGS
6) Conditional Use Permit #001-93 of John and Rachael Black for a cottage
occupation (catalog sales of Amsoil). This property is located 1.3
miles north of Gainesboro in the Gainesboro District.
(Mr. Miller) ............................................... F
MISCELLANEOUS
7) Discussion regarding proposed amendments to Chapter 144, Subdivision
Ordinance, and Chapter 165, Zoning Ordinance, of the Frederick County
Code.
(Mr. Wyatt) ............................................... G
8) Other. (no attachment) ...................................... H
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on
January 6, 1993.
PRESENT: Planning Commissioners present were: James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman; John
R. Marker, Vice Chairman/Back Creek District; George L. Romine, Citizen at
Large; Todd D. Shenk, Gainesboro District; Ronald W. Carper, Gainesboro
District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Manuel C. DeHaven, Stonewall
District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; John H. Light, Stonewall
District; and Beverly Sherwood, Board Liaison.
ABSENT: S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District
Planning Staff present were: Robert W. Watkins, Director; W
Zoning Administrator; Lanny C. Bise, 11, Planner I; and Kris C.
Planning Director.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Golladay called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS AND 1992 MEETING SCHEDULE
Action - Election of James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman
_ Wayne Miller,
Tierney, Deputy
A motion was made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Marker to nominate
James W. Golladay, Jr. as Chairman of the Frederick County Planning Commission for 1993.
Mr. Marker moved that nominations for chairman be closed and this motion was
unanimously passed.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
elect James W. Golladay, Jr. as Chairman of said Commission for the year of 1993.
F
Action - Election of John R_ Marker, Vice Chairman
A motion was made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Thomas to nominate
John R. Marker as Vice Chairman of the Frederick County Planning Commission for 1993.
Mrs. Copenhaver moved that nominations for vice chairman be closed. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Thomas and unanimously passed.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
elect John R. Marker as Vice Chairman of said Commission for the year of 1993.
Action - Election of Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
A motion was made by Mr. DeHaven and seconded by Mr. Thomas to nominate
Robert W. Watkins as Secretary of the Frederick County Planning Commission for 1993.
Mr. Golladay moved that nominations for secretary be closed and this motion was
unanimously passed.
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
elect Robert W. Watkins as Secretary of said Commission for the year of 1993.
Action - 1993 Meeting Schedule
Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Carper,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission voted unanimously to have
regular monthly meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. and
worksessions on the fourth Monday of each month, as needed, at 7:30 p.m. Both regular
meetings and worksessions will be held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court
House at 9 Court Square in Winchester, Virginia.
MINUTES
The first order of business was the consideration of the minutes of November 4,
1992. Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Thomas, the minutes of
November 4, 1992 were unanimously approved as presented.
3
BIMONTHLY REPORT
Chairman Golladay accepted the bimonthly report for the Commission's
information.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee CP&PS) 115/93 Mme_
Mr. Tierney reported that the CP&PS met and discussed items on the Capital
Improvements Plan (CIP). Mr. Tierney said that the Subcommittee discussed the proposed
maintenance facility at the landfill and requests from the School Board to increase the proposed
funding for the renovation to James Wood School. Those issues were resolved and the
Subcommittee is ready to send the CIP to the Planning Commission.
Transportation Committee - 1/4/93 Mtg
Mr. Thomas reported that the Transportation Committee discussed the vacation
of a small section of Conway Street, which is located off the 1-81 and Route 50 Exit. He said
that the Committee also discussed several roads with visibility problems due to vegetation.
VDOT will be looking at those roads to make minor improvements, such as brush cutting, to
improve visibility.
Withdrawal of Conditional Use Permit #013-92 of the Independent Order of Odd Fellows.
No Action
Mr. Watkins said that the staff received a letter from Mr. George W. Johnston,
III, representing the Independent Order of Odd Fellows. Mr. Watkins said that this group is
withdrawing their conditional use permit application #013-92 that was heard by the Commission
on November 4, 1992. Mr. Watkins said that this application was tabled for 60 days at the
Commission's November 4 meeting. No action was necessary from the Planning Commission.
4
Letter of Clarification, RE: Civil War Battlefields
Mr. Golladay said that he received a letter of clarification from the Economic
Development Commission's Executive Director, Mrs. June Wilmot, concerning her discussion
with the Commission regarding the Shenandoah Valley Civil War Battlefields and Commission
proposed legislation. He said that Ms. Wilmot states that she erroneously responded to a
question from the Commission concerning how many Winchester -Frederick County battlefields
were included in the twelve battlefields identified by the Plan. She states that the correct
response should have been five, rather than three, and those are: Cedar Creek, First Kernstown,
Second Kernstown, Third Winchester (Opequon), and Second Winchester.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Conditional Use Permit #015-92 of Kenneth R. Heishman for a cottage occupation
(building lawn furniture, picnic tables, etc.). This property is located on Route 522
South and is identified by PIN #870000A0000400 in the Shawnee District.
Action - Approved
Mr. Miller gave the background and review agency information. Mr. Miller said
that the applicant has advised that the building of lawn furniture is taking place in an accessory
building (garage) and there will be no other employees. The applicant has advised that he has
been building and marketing lawn furniture at this location on a part time basis for several years.
Mr. Kenneth R. Heishman, the applicant, was present to answer questions from
the Commission.
No one else was present to speak either in favor or opposition to the permit.
Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Carper,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
approve Conditional Use Permit #015-92 of Kenneth R. Heishman for a Cottage Occupation to
build lawn furniture, picnic tables, etc., with the following conditions:
Expansion of the facilities required for this business or the addition of more than one
employee will require a new conditional use permit.
2. Signage will be limited to the allowed 2 X 2 cottage occupation sign.
5
3. Should this use reach an intensity causing traffic problems, a Virginia Department of
Transportation evaluation will be required and the possible installation of a commercial
entrance may be mandatory.
Update of the 1993 Frederick County Comprehensive_ Policy Plan
Mr. Tierney presented sections of the County's Comprehensive Policy Plan which
contained recommended updates. Mr. Tierney said that the Plan had been reviewed and
recommended for approval by the County's Comprehensive Plans and Policies Subcommittee.
He said that significant updates to the plan consisted of the following:
1) Updated employment figures.
2) Updated figures for school enrollment and the status of planned school facilities.
3) Updated numbers for sewer and water hookups, capacities and facility status, along with
planned line extensions.
4) An extensive update of the Parks and Recreation section dealing with programming
procedures and plans for adding facilities to achieve and maintain compliance with
national standards outlined in the Virginia Outdoor Plan.
5) An expansion of the Urban Development Area encompassing roughly 700 acres along
Route 522 south of the current UDA boundary. This addition is bounded on the west by
Route 644 and extends south of the Route 644/Route 522 intersection to include the
Shenandoah Mobile Home Park. The eastern limit of the area follows a drainage swale
in a northeasterly direction from the mobile home park to the southern limit of the current
UDA.
The Planning Commission was in favor of the recommended changes and upon
motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Thomas,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously
recommend approval of the update to the 1993 Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan as
recommended by the Comprehensive Plans and Policies Subcommittee.
M
ADJOURNMENT
No further business was discussed and the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m..
Respectfully submitted,
Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
James W. Golladay, Jr., Chairman
r1U1\j 1 1u,Y REPORT
Zoning
---- --
AP-
November
°
[a
7 zE-4p
H O
U tom
_ �ompar:i.son of
1992
U
3 Ot-.�
U Gl
p
Individua
Totrtl
1 Monthly 'Potals
November 1991
U
(i y,
E x
Ul
Ot
p;
p
Total
0
>'
0
U
1990
y+
p
U
1989
H
>+
��
p
U
1988
1987
—19186O
H
U
E'
>+
H
�
O
F'
>+
p
>
H
5
O
U
r'll'01TALPERMITS
PROVEDZONING
19
15
20
11
1:IL5_80
_ 8
15
17
19
13
72
165
132
205
103
83
1
1. Multi -family
2. Single-family
0
p
0
0
0
0
_ 0
5
0
0
0
5
44
10
65
0
40
30
dwell.ings
_
3 6 4 4 2
19
1 3 6 9 4
23
26
49
61
3. Mobile Homes
- New Units
4. Industrial
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
4
0
0
0
.1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0Replacements
1
7
7
0
7
4
3
11
4
7
12
6
:,6
9
1
8
Commercial0
0
0
0
0
05.
j
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
7
2
20
1
4
0 0 0 0 0
6. Miscellaneous
5
11
10
9
42
79
60
48
50
38
14 1157
—1-110 - County Total
qnn
150
100
50
0
1990 1991 1992
County Total - npsidenti_nl — — Commercial & TnA„Gr,4 nj
MONTHLY RNPOR'T
ikccumutative
Monthly
Totals
zoning
_L__
-i=LL-
January - November 1992
Total
January - November 1991
'Total
_ 1990
1989
1988
1987
1986
In
U
�y
U]
U
✓
al
Gtl
to
Z
Ot
O
tj
0
OU
O
M
(W,�
7
C�7
WW
7
tn�
UW
'✓
[A
v1
p
p
H
U
E-i
000
0
U
H
O
U
H0
E -4z
O
U
H
O
U
O
H
�+
p
U
TO'T'AL, PERMITS AP-
PROVED FOR ZONING
I. Multi -family
270
2
271
13
237
0
272
36
295
48
1345
99
241
7
270
17
202
0
333
39
415
51
1461
1830
1899
1240
114
256
r1821877
244
227
38
2. Single-family
dwellings
3. Mobile Homes
91
78
50
90
56
365
72
39
60'
132
55
358
435
654
619
604
432
- New Units
- Replacements
19
10
9
39
15
24
11
8
3
3
0
3
12
7
5
84
40
44
28
_ 19
9
38
15
23
15
11
4
2
2
0
20
14
6
103
61
128
54
118
58
146
69
167
83
141
55
42
74
60
77
84
86
4. Industrial
0
2
0
0
0
2
5. Commercial
6. Miscellaneous
0
0
0
2
2
4
8
6
5
8
5
32
128
44
133
97
43
158
139
176
141
177 1
791
125
153
122
149
283
832
856
762
735
802
580
PERMITS - County Total
2000 --.
1500
1000
500
0
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1997
County Total Residential _,. _. —. Commercial & Industrial
MONTHLY REPORT
Comparison
of Individual
Monthly Totals
7,on.i.ng
December
1992
Total
December
1991
--
Total
1289
8
19871
86
Ga
Oo
O
W
E'
H
H
O
H
Ztrl
C
>
iaj
`Wl
�Er'r
�Wz
E'
NE`
zwwa
ECjt
H
O
p
>+
>+
7
>,
>,,
>,
E
C01
7
U)W
rC
;r��
ul
O
U
U)
U
U
in
p
0
OU
U5
U
O
U
O
1'0'PJ1.L PERP9I'PS 11P-
U
PROVED FOR ZONING
9
18
9
4
14
54
50
12
9
20
14
105
81
70
98
:117]:100
I. Multi -family
0
p
0
0
0
0
34
0
0
0
0
34
6
8
2. Single-family
0
15
15
dwellings
4
5
3
1
3
16
6
4
2
11
~4
27
24
28
42
38
31
3. Mobile homes
- New Units
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
_
I
0
0
0
1
2
5
2
9
5
19
- Replacements
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5_
0
6
2
12
4. Industrial
1
0
0
0
1
2
2
0
0
0
0
00
0
0
0
0
0
0
5. Commercial0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
15
3
2
6. Miscellaneous
5
9
6
3
11
34
9
8
7
9
9
42 1
42
26
32
56
33
PERMITS - County Total
200 —
150 _
100
50 _
i
I
o
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
'----' County
Total
Residential
— • —
• —
Commercial &
Industrial
MON'TIILY REPORT
zoning
ur nccumutative
Januar - December
Y 1992
Total
Monthly 'ToLAIS
—
Jan__uary - December
1991
'Total
-
1990
-12
1989
1-12
1988
1-12
1987
1-12
1986
_
R0
M
4
IN
V
w
Z
O
N
U
�/
�
0
O
Ot
WLD
U
P4
t-
O
H
�
O
H
Op
HU
H
U
H
H
On
U
H
HH
Z
O
E+
�,
O
U
Gtll
o
Ot
U UHi pq to p
H
H
U
TO'TNL PERMITS AP-
PROVED FOR ZONING
279
289
246
276
309
1399
291
282
211
353
429
1566
1911
1899
1975
2016
13-40
1. Multi -family
2
13
0
36
48
99
41
17
0
39
51
148
262
238
244
242
53
2. Single-family
dwellings
95
83
53
91
59
381
78
43
62-
143
59
385
459
682
661
642
463
3. Mobile homes
- New Units
19
10
43
15
it
8
3
0
12
7
88
40
29
19
38
15
15
11
2
2
21
1
105
61
133
59
120
59
155
75
172
85
160
67
- Replacements
9
28
3
3
5
48
10
23
4
0
7
44
74
62
80
87
93
4. Industrial
0
2
0
0
0
2
1
17
0
3
122
27
21
0
2
6
5. Commercial
0
0
0
2
2
4
8
6
5
8
5
32
132
50
148
100
45
6. Miscellaneous
163
148
182
144
188
825
134
161
129
158
292
874
898
788
767
858
613
PERMI'T'S - County Total
2000 —
1500
1000 .-A__
500 i
o
1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
County Total Residential --- Commercial & Industrial
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary
SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report
DATE: January 22, 1993
(1) Rezonings Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
Twin Lakes 4/04/90 (Shaw) (RA to B2/RP)
(2) Rezonings Approved: (dates are BOS meeting dates)
None
(3) Rezonings Denied: dates are BOS meeting dates
None
(4) Conditional Use Permits Pending• (dates are submittal dates
Kenneth R. Heishman 11/12/92 Shaw Furniture Building
John & Rachael Black 01/04/93 Gain Cottage Occupation
Catalog Sales
Ryland Homes 01/14/93 Opeq Off Premise Sign
(5) Conditional Use Permits Approved• (dates are approval dates)
None
(6) Site Plans Pending: (dates are submittal dates
Wheatlands Wastewater
Fac. 9/12/89
Opeq
Trmt.facil
Grace Brethren Church
6/08/90
Shaw
Church
Flex Tech
10/25/90
Ston
Lgt. Industrial
Hampton Chase
12/18/90
Ston
S.F. & T.H.
Lake Centre
05/15/91
Shaw
Townhouses
Red Star Express Lines
05/24/91
Stan
Whse. Addition
Freeton
04/27/92
Opeq
Townhouses
2
Winchester Church of
God 07/29/92
BkCk
Church
Salvation Army
12/03/92
Ston
Ofc/Housing
Valley Proteins (rev)
12/16/92
Gain
industrial
Potomac Edison
12/23/92
Ston
Elec.Substation
Glaize Components
01/21/93
Shaw
Mfg. Plant
Cracker Barrel
01/21/93
Shaw
Restaurant/
Fairfax Drive Ext.
08/05/92
Opequon
Gift Shop
(7) Site Plans Approved: (dates are approval dates)
None
(8) Subdivisions Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
Henry Business Park 01/08/93
Stonewall
(9) Subdivisions Pending Final Admin. A roval: (PIC aRproyal
dates
Abrams Point, Phase 1
6/13/90
Shawnee
Hampton Chase
02/27/91
Stonewall
Lake Centre
06/19/91
Shawnee
Fredericktowne Est.
10/16/91
Opequon
(sections 5, 6 and 7)
Coventry Courts
12/04/91
Shawnee
Senseny Glen
12/04/91
Shawnee
Freeton
05/20/92
Opequon
Fairfax Drive Ext.
08/05/92
Opequon
Deer Run @ Sherando
08/19/92
Opequon
(10) PMDP Pending: (dates are submittal dates)
James R. Wilkins 111 11/02/92 Shawnee
Prince Frederick Business Park 01/19/93 Shawnee
(11) FMDP Pending Administrative Approval: dates are BOS aRproval
dates
Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back Creek
Hampton Chase (revised) 05/27/92 Stonewall
(12) FMDP Administ. Approved (dates are admin. approval dates)
None
3
(13) Board of Zoning Appeals Applications Pending (submit. dates
David
Walker
01/21/93
Shaw
15'
rear/house
Donald Stotler
01/21/93
Gain
Lot
size
Jerry
Bain
01/22/93
BkCk
16'front/garage
(14) BZA Applications
Approved•
(approval dates)
Alder
Homes
01/19/93
Opeq
10'
rear - house
Potomac Edison Co. 01/19/93 Ston 50' front & 15'
side;
replace
control bldg
W.H.Emmart & Son 01/19/93 Opeq 8.5'front &
6.01side/sign
Barry L. Bowser 01/19/93 BkCk 191front
addition
(15) BZA Applications Denied•
None
(16) PLANS RECD. FOR REVIEW FROM CITY OF WINCHESTER
None
E. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #25
1. Local Transportation Issues & Priorities
Bob Watkins briefed Commissioner Thomas and other VDOT
officials on local transportation issues and priorities.
2. House NumberingZ911 System
Staff is continuing with the update of the House
Numbering Project through the use of ACAD11, dBase IV, and general
inquiry.
3. Local Battlefield Plannin
Bob Watkins attended a meeting at the Lord Fairfax
Planning District offices to discuss possible university assistance
with local battlefield planning efforts.
4. National Fire Incident Reporting System
On January 8, Evan Wyatt produced census tract maps for
Frederick County's 12 volunteer fire companies. These maps were
requested by the Director of Emergency Services, Tom Owens, to
assist Emergency Services with the National Fire Incident Reporting
System.
5. Site Plan Reviews
Evan Wyatt conducted the following site plan reviews:
On January 5, met with Greenway Engineering to conduct a
preliminary site plan review for the proposed Corp of Engineers
facility. This site is located in the Prince Frederick Office Park
on the south side of Route 50 East.
On January 12, met with Greenway Engineering and Toan &
Associates to discuss requirements for improvements to the Shamrock
Truck Terminal site. This site is located on the south side of
Tyson Drive in the Stonewall Industrial Park.
On January 14, participated in a Technical Review
Committee meeting to discuss improvements to the Glaize Truss
Manufacturing site. This site is located off of Arbor Court near
the Winchester Regional Airport._
6. Population
On January 15, Evan Wyatt provided the Center for Public
Services with information that challenges specific data related to
the Virginia State -Local Cooperative Program for Population
Estimates.
7. Stephens City
Ron Lilley is discussing minor boundary adjustments with
the Town of Stephens City.
P/C Review Date: 2/03/93
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
#001-93
HENRY BUSINESS PARK
KIM HENRY
4 LOTS
LOCATION: At the intersection of Baker Lane (Rt. 1200) and Fort
Collier Road
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 54000OA000097F and 54000OA000097L
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned B-2 (Business General) and
B-3 (Business Industrial) land use - vacant
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE• Zoned M-1 (Light
Industrial) and B-2 (Business General) land use - business and
commercial
PROPOSED USE: 4 lots - 2.3387 acres
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation• No objection to the
subdivision of this property. Before development this office
will require a complete set of site plans detailing entrance
design, drainage features and traffic flow data from the
I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual 4th Edition for review. Any
work on VDOT right-of-way will be covered under land use
permit.
Inspections Dept.: Shall comment on building Use Group at the
time of structural plans review. Building shall comply with
the Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, BOCA National
Building Code, and title 28 Code of Federal Regulation, Part
36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public
Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities.
Sanitation: 1st review
sanitation sewer easement.
oil
- correct and resubmit. Add
Planning & Zoning: This proposed subdivision of four lots is
in conformance with approved Master Development Plan #005-91.
Proposed lots 39 and 40 are zoned B-3 and lots 41 and 42 are
zoned B-2. Each individual lot will require a site plan for
development. Lots 39 and 40 must use a shared entrance off
Fort Collier Road to be in compliance with the Master Plan
approval. A deed of dedication will be required for the two
narrow strips on either side of Fort Collier Road that are to
be used for public street purposes. Stormwater management
will be a major issue during the development phase of these
lots.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEBRUARY 3, 1993 PC MTG: Approval
APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST
SUBDIVISION
FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA
Date: //g/9 3 Application # Fee Paid l/
Applicant/Agent: r/E–Al" ssoc,,.arEs
Address: P.o• (3o,2
30 7 S SH.AIJA G 1 )-,I V
Phone: -11c3
Owners name:
Address: 15;71:2-
I,"'C- - M's
,'1:2-I,NcetM's
Phone: t,6z - 73c�o
Please list names of all owners, principals and /or majority
stockholders:
Contact Person: a tia ate` S. LtT�,,
Phone: tnto7- tics
Name of Subdivision: 4Aa 9,�, nE ss l�Rlt
Number of Lots Total Acreage—.2-.3387
Ac–
Property Location: 1. r+�c s r cr�ont pc
�^-- A -kc tZ Lla na s, IZT ! •2� e7
AN TviLT Cv t_,,e z
(Give State Rt.#, distance and direction from intersection)
Magisterial District S-r-oHc w,4�
Tax ID Number (GPIN) SLl. . A. 97Ic- ¢ 974
-7-
Property zoning and present use: Zo,jc 13'3 - 6 2
P/4?e SC' -ry$ C ' YItGAN 1 -
Adjoining property zoning and use: ZAKE 6X 61r = A4 llvEss &-
V'.46A.uT /4-// Ulm CO�iyt��iPciAL
Has a Master Development Plan been submitted for this project?
Yes X No
If yes, has the final MDP been approved by the Board of
Supervisors?
Yes X No
What was the MDP title? NE�yRy �uSiAeSS FAQ.%,
Does the plat contain any changes from the approved MDP?
Yes ^>1,_ No
If yes, specify what changes: Atp'WTrotiA#-- 5 # OF sTrZct: bEb(cATeoN
S EZ �wtM�n�TS Q Il.�.O. t
Minimum Lot Size (smallest lot) 20,3-55 SQ. GT
Number and types of housing units in this development:
Number N /4
Types N /�
k7CINITY" AMP ---
(SCALE. 1 " = 2, 000')
F/NAL SUBDI WS/ON PLA T
L n TS 39, 40, 41 & 42
HENRY BUS/NESS PARK
STONEWALL MAGIS7ERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
NOTfS-
1) NO 77TLE REPORT FURNISHED.
THE PROPERTY CELINEA TED HEREON IS LOCA TED ON TAX ASSESSMENT MAP
d 54.. A.. 97F & , K54.. A.. 97L.
`- -J) CURRENT ZONING: LOTS 39 & 4(' - ZONED 63, USf_- VACANT LANA
41 & 42 - ZONED 82, USE- VACANT LAND
4) CURRENT OWNFRS.- KIMER� i G. & PAULA O. HENRY _
DEED BCUK 671 PAGE 710
AREA TABULA TION
TOTAL LOT AREA 101, 874 SO. FT OR 2.3387 ACRES
TOTAL S7REET DEDICA770N 2,088 SOFT. Cle 0.0480 ACRES
TOTAL REMAINING AREA 1,091,647 SO.FT OR 25.0606 ACRES
TOTAL SITE AREA 1,195, 503 SO. FT. OR 27.4473 ACRES
APPROVED BY
SUBDIVISION ADM7N7S7AA , Cfr'
PLANNING COMMISSION
FRED. CO SANI TA 77ON AU77YORI TY
VA. DEPT. OF TRA NSPORTA77ON
.,• X71-I,Yz
gflS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT DA TF
ANO DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY.
- DA TE
DA 7E
DATE
!! 9z_
DA TE
OCTOBER 19, 1992 SCALE.
5HEET 1 OF 4
r to TFI T,��.
SUR VEYOR'S CER T/F/CA TE
I, EDWARD W DOVE A DULY CERTIFIED LAND SURVEYOR IN THE COMMONWEAL TH OF ORG/N/A,
DO HEREBY CER77FY THAT / HAVE CAREFULLY SURVEYED THE PROPERTY DELINEATED BY THIS PLAT
AND THAT IT /S CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF- THAT IT /S A SUBDIVISION
OF THE LAND ACQUIRED BY K/MERL Y G. & PAULA O. HENRY FRO,V L/. P. & RUBY S. DARLINGTON,
RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 671 AT PAGE 710 & DEE! BOOK 704 AT PAGE 41 /N THE OFFICE OF
THE CLERK OF T7/E CIRCUIT COURT OF FREDERICK COUNTY.
1, FURTHER CER 77FY THAT THE LAND EMBRACED IN THIS SUBDIVISION LIES EN77RELY W1THIN THE
BOUNDS OF 77 -IE ORIGINAL TRACT, THA T THIS PLA T REPRESENTS AN ACCURA TF SURVEY OF THE SAME.
GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 19th DAY OF OCTOBER, 1992
EDWARD W. DOVE C.L.S.
OWNER'S CONSENT
WE THE UNDERSIGNED OWNERS OF T7 -IE PROPERTY SHOWN HEREON AND DESCRIBED IN 77 -IE SURVEYOR'S
CER77F/CA TE; HEREBY ADOPT 77 -IIS PLAN OF SUED/VISION, DED/CA 7F THE 57REE7S- TO PUBLIC USE,
ESTABLISH THE MINIMUM BUILDING RES77?IC770N LINES, RESERVE THE RIGHTS OF WAY AS INDICATED
FOR CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND OPERA TON OF STREETS, STORM SEWERS, SANITARY SEWERS
AND WATER LINES, AND AGREE THAT IRON PIPE fl4LL BE SET AT ALL LOT CORNERS UNDER THE
SUPERVISION OF A CERTIFIED LAND SUR IEYOR. lIE FURTHER CER77FY THAT THIS FINAL PLAT IS
DRAWN /N ACCORDANCE WITH AN APPROVED FINAL MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN ON FILE IN 774E
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT OF FREDERICK COUNTY.
DA 7F
DA TE
CURVE TABLE
CURVE
RADIUS
LENGTH
TANGENT
CHORD
BEARING
DELTA
1
13883.51 '
_
103.78'
51.89
103.78'
N 34 44 40' E
002542'
IA
1388_.3 51'
98.78'
49.39'
98.78'
N J445'17" E
00:2428'
_
13883.51'
5.00'
250'
5.00'
N 34'.1227' E
00171'14'
_1B
2
30.00'
45.08'
28.03'
40.96'
N 77U452" E
86V6'04'
3
25.00'
46.08'
J2.95'
39.83'
S 06 J3 J7" E
105:J657'
4
425.00'
81.57'
40. 91 '
81. 45'
S 40'4457' W
10:5949'
4A
425 00'
4.90'
2.45'
4.90'
S 45 55 03' W
00 39:36 "
46
425.00'
76.68'
.38.44'
76.57'
S 40:25'09' W
1020'13"
_
5
_
14685.12'
12.15'
6.08'
12.15'
N 34'31:39" E
00'0251'
6
7 T
7_30.00'
21.30'
10.65'
21.30'
N 583156" W
0140'20"
30.00' 45.07' 28. 01 ' 40.95' N 77:3.529" E
86'04 50'
_
8_
^_25.00'
`
45.80'
32.55'
39.66'
S 065325" E
1045722'
_ _
9
735.00'
54.99'
J2.52'
64.97'
N 60170 55" W
05173 59'
s/IEEr 2 CF 4
THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT N DA TE- OCTOBER 19, 1992 SCALE.' I'= 50'
AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. ry
BAKER LANE
VARIABLE RIW
0 R--IJ88,151' Z -10_T78 -
/F, T /ZOO
O
R – J0.00'
— BUFFER \ 45. 08'
Z/4-- —Qol7 T 7
20 WA TERL1,V6-
J5, 8.R.i.--&
R,
R X423. pp 4A R = 25.00'
L = 46.08'
PROPOSED ROAD
50' WDE
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 .50 100
I Inch — M ft.
THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED INITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT
•
AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. �� DA 7F
ARCHITECTS
OCTOBER 19, 1992
SHEET J OF 4
SCALE: t' = 50'
to
LOT 41
26,751
SQ. FT.�'
WI N,
h
Qh
�3
Z
:zt
S J03754' w
Lo
148.22'
OZ
LOT 42
25,280 50. FT
1 15,
N;
20"
L,54.oj'
S J575,02- w
II
S--A4N. SEWER ESM'T
N JoVg'f5'E 1'14 1*
V
R X423. pp 4A R = 25.00'
L = 46.08'
PROPOSED ROAD
50' WDE
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 25 .50 100
I Inch — M ft.
THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED INITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT
•
AND DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY. �� DA 7F
ARCHITECTS
OCTOBER 19, 1992
SHEET J OF 4
SCALE: t' = 50'
R=1388J.51
L�6.62"
BAKER LANE
VARIABLE Q,
'468512'
N
I
Ra14685.72 "
L=12.15•
BUFFER LINE
20 • WA TERL/NE I \
ESM'T. \
h
W
m
0
I\I N
�r
i to I 1 \y '�
lu
i
WN
EX. 30" SAN. SEWER &
} "S WATERLINE EASEMENT
N 11 12 I \ D. B. 5JO PC. 199
LOT 40 \ \
I I I 20, J55 SO. FT. \ o \ \
P2511 I \ \
2 _ N J6t730,3- C \ \
\ m
I ,QzLOT 39 \\ N \
C
2-9,488 SQ. FT. \ \ \
�• I\ \
20' SANITARY SEWER ESM'T.
15' — N JOt79'15" E
SLOPE & DRAINACE \ t\ u \
EASEMENT
rn �
S 6! \ \
GRAPHIC SCALE \ \
0 23 50 100 \
1 Inch — 30 IL
SHEET 4 OF 4
THIS PLAT HAS BEEN PREPARED WITHOUT THE BENEFIT OF A TITLE REPORT DA 7F• OCTOBER 19, 1992 SCALE. 1 = 50"
FWD DOES NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL ENCUMBRANCES ON THE PROPERTY.
4
TR n i_
P/C Review Date: 2/03/93
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ##001-93
JOHN & RACHAEL BLACK
Cottage Occupation
Catalog Sales - Amsoil
LOCATION: 1.3 miles north of Gainesboro on Route 600
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro
PROPERTY ID NUMBER 19000020000040
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas), land use -
agricultural
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas),
land use - residential and wooded
PROPOSED USE: Cottage Occupation -- catalog sales - Amsoil
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Department of Transportation: No comment
Fire Marshal: Cannot comment on fire safety issues due to
lack of information submitted with application
Inspections Department: Building shall comply with the
Virginia Uniform Statewide Building code and Section 303, Use
Group B (Business), of the BOCA National Building Code/1990.
Other codes that apply are title 28 Code of Federal
Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of
Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial
Facilities. Permit required shall be a change of use for the
existing building being used.
Health Department: No objection to proposal as long as water
usages does not increase.
Paqe 2
Black CUP
Planning Denartment: Applicant has represented this
application to be catalog sales for Amsoil (a synthetic
lubricating oil) from a newly constructed accessory building.
Only traffic generated will be occasional delivery vehicles
that might be expected at most rural residential locations.
Within the bounds of the presentation this should have no
noticeable impact on the general character of the
neighborhood.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FEBRUARY 3, 1993 PC MEETING: Approval
with the following conditions:
1. Any expansion of the business or facilities used to
conduct this business will require a new conditional use
permit.
Submittal Deadline
P/C Meeting ) -.f, _ 573
BOS Meeting 2-2 V - �P l�
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
1. A olicant (The applicant if the owner other)
NAME: Jnhn & Rachael Blank
265 Pond View Rd.
ADDRESS: Winchester VA 22603
TELEPHONE
Cj 019---6c� ':sv
2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of
the property:
1 l(
3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions)
JV0-e i V ( D/Lc ice% �oOb
4. The property has a road frontage of NO feet and a
depth of feet and consists of 9, -77 acres.
(Please be exact) — -
5. The property is owned by 0„i,u � � �pi�� as
evidenced by deed from 6,92 y ie *eaL E: y recorded
(previous owner)
in deed book no. gs on page /%o registry of the
County of Frederick.
6. 14 -Digit Property Identification No.
Magisterial District C; A- /� E5 A3 o
Current Zoning Ro Z' _
7. Adjoining Property:
USE ZONING
North .
East0 y/9
A -
South
West
page -2-
CUP Application
August, 1990
8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept.
before completing)
62 Ti -A &� 6 d e- y ,a R r. T i a .-/ - G- A r: z-, c, C S D -- ,�•r c o/ t
9. It is -proposed that the following buildings will be
constructed: -� C sz -4 6 ,� �. ,o
10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or
corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear
and in front of (across street from) the property sought to be
permitted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people
will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST
COMPLETE 14—DIGIT NUMBER.
Gv2-�C�
JC
Address
v,
Property
IDT /<7
wN,r�v�rJ LU —�Y
Address NC �� Z3c x urs-,
Property IDT
`Y1v2 � , lZcr3C L i���Jr s
Address c?- j q 7-6-4
Property
IDT
'7r�h4 S J Ai rte L
JL,.v,�z
Address
$i C6Al
� �, ��k z�Z zzc,5
Property
IDT /C-7 _ -- s z
PqU 1 cAN•1i X7-0 <
Address
Property
IDT f _ _ 0 f c7 _ _ 14-7
{YJ�
AddressC>3
2Q y�c�, z,D77Z
t
Property
IDT Icy ^,� _ 5-1S -"
NAME
page -4-
CUP Application
August, 1990
12. Additional comments, if any:
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application
and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to
allow the use described in this application. I understand that the
sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed
at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the
first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after
the Board of Supervisors' public hearing.
Signature of Applicant
Signature of Owner n�
Owners' Mailing Address C, .:5-- Po.v eWc--,% ✓,¢_-2 Z6 0 3
Owners' Telephone No. �c, - 3 ��U
Page -3-
CUP Application
August, 1990
11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show
proposed and/or .existing structures on the property, including
measurements to all property lines.
/1�7- 2 - IV
/.—� --Z-
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
703 /665-5651
Fax 703 / 678-0682
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II
RE: Proposed Amendments to Chapter 144 and Chapter 165
DATE: January 20, 1993
The Frederick County Planning Department requested that the Development Review and
Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) conduct a comprehensive review of the Frederick
County Zoning Ordinance. The purpose of this comprehensive review was to address items
of concern that have been expressed since the Zoning Ordinance was amended in February,
1990. The DRRS discussed these various items throughout 1992, as well as January, 1993.
The DRRS has recommended that the full Planning Commission discuss all proposed
amendments to date. The following discussion items reflect these proposals, their new
codified references, and a brief explanation of how the new language varies from the old
language.
Please bring your copies of Chapter 144 and Chapter 165 to this meeting for reference
purposes.
of North Loudoun Street P.O. Box 601
Vi'inchcster. VA 22601 Winchcstcr, VA 22604
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 144, SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE
OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE
ARTICLE IV, Subdivision Review Procedures
144-11. Preliminary sketches. (pg. 14415)
A preliminary sketch may be required for any subdivision that does not require a Master
Development Plan. Within the Rural Areas (RA) zone, a preliminary sketch shall be required
for any proposed subdivision which contains roads intended for dedication to the Virginia
Department of Transportation for state maintenances or rural preservation lots. Preliminary
sketch plans, complete with all materials required by section 144-35 of this chapter, shall be
submitted to the Subdivision Administrator for review and comment prior to preparation of final
plans.
(New language has been created to state that preliminary sketches are required for subdivisions
containing state maintained roads or rural preservations lots.)
ARTICLE V, Design Standards
144-31B(2). Major rural subdivisions. Access (pg. 14434)
All roads serving lots within a major rural subdivision shall be built to the Tertiary Subdivision
Street Standards of the Virginia Department of Transportation and dedicated to Frederick County
for eventual acceptance into the state secondary road system.
(Old language required all roads in a major rural subdivision to be built to Tertiary Standards.
This creates a scenario where an existing road passing through a parcel to be subdivided, but
not,serving lots, would have to be built to Tertiary Standards.)
1
ARTICLE IV, Plan Requirements
144-37G. Final plats. (pg. 14442)
An indication of the portion of the allowable density from the parent tract, (as determined by
section 165-52, Permitted residential density; exception; of Chapter 165 of the Frederick County
Code) which is to be allocated to each parcel resulting from the subdivision.
(The proposed amendment would require that an indication of the portion of the permitted density
from a parent parcel that is to be conveyed to newly created lots be placed on the plat. This
would eliminate confusion since the allowable density on a parcel created after the adoption date
of these regulations may vary based on the history of the parcel.)
144-37AA. Final plats (pg. 14442)
Notarized owners certification as required by section 15.1-477 of the Code of Virginia.
144-39A(88). Minor rural subdivisions (pg. 14444)
A statement indicating the portion of the allowable density of the parent tract, (as determined
by section 165-52, Permitted residential density; exception; of Chapter 165 of the Frederick
County Code) which is to be allocated to each parcel resulting from the subdivision.
(This language has been created for the same reason as section 144-3 M Final plats. The
language also replaces the former language under section 144-39A(8), which provided for one
time divisions. One time divisions were eliminated by previous amendments to this chapter.)
144-39A(10). Minor rural subdivisions. (pg. 14444)
Notarized owners certification as required by section 15.1-477 of the Code of Virginia.
2
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CHAPTER 165, ZONING ORDINANCE
OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY CODE
ARTICLE H, Amendments
165-9A & 165D Applications. (pg. 16514)
This section describes procedures for petitioning a rezoning application. It has been suggested
that we revise this section to change Zoning Administrator to the Department of Planning and
Development.
ARTICLE III, Conditional Use Permits
165-16GG Conditions. (pg. 16523)
Cash contributions for road improvements or for planned facilities identified in the Frederick
County Capital Improvements Plan.
(It has been recommended that this section be eliminated, as this is considered a proffer which
is voluntarily offered by the applicant.)
ARTICLE IV, Supplementary Use Regulations
165-23G Setback requirements (pg. 16528)
Fences, free-standing walls, and berms shall be exempt from the setback requirements.
(The new language includes berms as an exemption.)
16.5-2436 Height limitations; exceptions. (pg. 16529)
If any of the above exceptions exceed the height limitation of the proposed zoning district, the
structure shall be required to be setback the normal setback plus one foot for every foot over the
maximum allowed height of that zoning district.
1
165-26B(3) Accessory dwellings. (pg. 16530)
In no case shall a mobile home be allowed as an accessory dwelling in the RP Residential
Performance District, R4 Residential Planned Community District, and R5 Residential
Recreational Community District.
(This language has been modified to avoid confusion with permitted temporary or permanent
housing for workers on operating farms.)
165-26E Accessory uses. (pg. 16530)
In no case shall a mobile home or temporary trailer be allowed as an accessory use, unless it
is used for temporary or permanent housing on a bona fide, operating farm.
(This language has been created to eliminate the possibility of using mobile homes as storage
buildings or other uses.)
165-27D Vehicle parking restrictions. (pg. 16534)
No part of a tractor -trailer, bus, dump truck, or any truck with a total length of twenty-five (25)
feet or greater shall be parked or stored within the RP Residential Performance District, the R5
Residential Recreational Community District, or the MH 1 Mobile Home Community District.
(This heading has been changed from Tractor -trailer parking, and has been amended to include
buses and dump trucks, and the R5 Zoning District.)
165-27E(7) Driveway access. (pg. 16536)
It has been suggested that this heading be titled Entrance Requirements instead of Driveway
Access. This revision would assist in avoiding confusion with section 165-29A New driveways.
(pg. 1654 1)
165-30J Sign permits. (pg. 16549)
Before a sign .Permit may be constructed, reconstructed or altered, a sign permit shall be
obtained from the Frederick County Building Official.
(Current language states "...shall be obtained from the Director of Code Administration. " Vie
new language is an attempt to avoid confusion with other administrators.)
165-30J(1_) Sign permits. (pg. 16549)
Commemorative plaques and historical markers shall be exempt from obtaining sign permits.
2
165-47C(2) Inoperative motor vehicles. (pg. 16569)
Where inoperable motor vehicles are stored outside of a completely enclosed building as allowed
by this chapter, they shall be screened by fences, landscaping, or natural vegetation to ensure
that they are not visible from public roads or surrounding properties.
(The current language reads "...screened by fences, landscaping, natural vegetation, or other
means... ". Or other means has been removed from this section to avoid interpretation conflicts,
such as using tarps and similar items to screen inoperative vehicles.)
ARTICLE V, RA Rural Areas District
(The proposed amendments to this section are aimed at clarifying the required setbacks in the
RA zone, including correcting an oversight which resulted in there being no setback specified
from a preexisting road which, at the time of subdivision, is not state maintained.)
165-55 Setback requirements. (pg. 16577)
The following setback requirements shall apply to all parcels within the RA Rural Areas Zoning
District.
165-55A Traditional five acre lots. (pg. 16577)
Setbacks from traditional five acre rural preservation lots which adjoin any parcel other than
another rural preservation lot shall be determined by the existing land use of the adjoining parcel
as set out below. Setbacks for rural preservation lot lines which adjoin other rural preservation
lots shall be as set out by section 165-55B of this chapter.
165-55A(1) Front setbacks. (pg. 16577)
The front setback for any principal or accessory use or structure located on a traditional five
acre lot shall be sixty (60) feet from the property line or right-of-way of the street, road, or
ingress/egress easement.
3
165-55A(2) Side or rear setbacks. (pg. 16577)
The minimum side or rear setback for any principal use or structure shall be determined by the
primary use of the adjoining parcel as follows:
ADJOINING LAND USE SETBACK
residential/vacant 50 feet
agricultural 100 feet
orchard 200 feet
165-55B Rural preservation lots. (pg. 16577)
The minimum setbacks from rural preservation lot lines which adjoin other rural preservation
lots shall be as follows:
165-55B(1) Front setback. (pg. 16577)
The front setback for any principal or accessory use or structure shall be sixty (60) feet from
the right-of-way of any existing state maintained road, and forty-five (45) feet from the right-of-
way of any existing private ingress/egress easement or state maintained road constructed to serve
the subdivision.
165-55B(_2) Side setback. (pg. 16577)
No principal use or structure shall be located closer than fifteen (15) feet from any side lot line.
165-55B(3) Rear setback. (pg. 16577)
No principal use or structure shall be located closer than forty (40) feet from any rear lot line.
165-55C Existing structures. (pg. 16578)
The side or rear setbacks for any lot created around an existing use or structure, or any family
division lot shall be fifty (50) feet from all lot lines.
165-55D Accessory uses. (pg. 16578)
The minimum setback for any accessory use or structure shall be fifteen (15) feet from any side
or rear property line of a traditional five acre lot or any side or rear property line of a rural
preservation lot.
4
165-56 Dimensional requirements. (pg. 16578)
165.56(A) Minimum width. (pg. 16578)
The minimum width for rural preservation lots, fronting on roads proposed for dedication shall
be two hundred (200) feet at the front setback, with the exception of lots fronting on the turn-
around of a cul-de-sac, which shall have a minimum width of one hundred (100) feet at the cul-
de-sac. The minimum width for all other lots shall be two hundred fifty (250) feet at the front
setback line.
.ARTICLE VII, R4 Residential Planned Community District
165-72 Design Requirements (pg. 16601)
(The following language has been drafted to allow for flexibility in the design of a R4
development.)
165-72B(l) Alternative dimensional reauirement plan. (pg. 16601) '4S ?
Itioy2 w�7 h� �� o1 ✓��` pk �V ✓�"�5 691 k�5�����j�� Vkr��.� �6�'. �`'
An alternative, dimensional plan may be included with the master development plan for the
development. This plan shall describe a system of dimensional requirements for all planned uses
in the develo x��nt " When these dimensional requirements are approved, they shall constitute
enforceable amendments to this chapter, applying to the land included in the development, and
shall replace other dimensional requirements contained in this chapter. Such alternative
dimensional requirements shall be based on general concepts described by the plan submitted.
The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors shall only approve an alternative plan if the
plan meets all of the intentions of this chapter, conforms with policies set forth in the
Comprehensive Plan, and follows generally accepted good planning practices.
165-72G(1) Alternative_ buffer and screening plan. (pg. 16602)
An alternative plan for buffers and screening and the separation of uses may be included with
the master development plan for the development. This plan shall describe a specific system of
buffers, screening and use separation for all planned uses in the development. When these
dimensional requirements are approved, they shall constitute enforceable amendments to this
chapter applying to the land included in the development and shall replace other buffer and
screening requirements contained in this chapter. Such alternative requirements shall be based
on general concepts described by the plan submitted. The Planning Commission and Board of
Supervisors shall only approve an alternative plan if the plan meets all of the intentions of this
chapter, conforms with policies set forth in the Comprehensive Plan, and follows generally
accepted good planning practices. Buffer and screening requirements for the perimeter boundary
of the planned community shall not be included in the alternative buffer and screening plans.
5
165-72M(3) Phasing (pg. 16603)
A reasonable balance shall be maintained between residential and non-residential uses. The
phasing plan for the development shall include a reasonable portion of the non-residential uses
in all phases of the development.
ARTICLE XX, Definitions
INOPERABLE MOTOR VEHICLE (pg. 16675) - A vehicle which is not legally operable due
to lack of licensing, as required by the Virginia Division of Motor Vehicles, and/or lack of
safety inspections, as required by the Virginia State Police Department.
(The current definition states that an inoperable vehicle is one not licensed and not stored in an
enclosed building, or a vehicle missing a major component necessary for safe operation. It has
been. recommended that "not stored in an enclosed building" be removed so this will not be in
conflict section 165-47C. It has also been recommended that "missing a major component
necessary for safe operation" be removed to alleviate staff from making technical determinations
that they are not qualified to make.)
MOBILE HOME (pg. 16677) - A structure, transportable in one (1) or more sections, which
in travel mode is eight (8) body feet or more in width or forty (40) body feet or more in length
or, when erected on site, is three hundred twenty (320) or more square feet and which is built
in a permanent chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent
foundation.
(The remainder of the current definition has been eliminated. It states "...with or without a
permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities and includes plumbing, heating,
air-conditioning and electrical systems. " It has been recommended that this portion be
eliminated to be consistent with section 165-26E.
0