Loading...
PC 07-05-95 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia JULY 5, 1995 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Meeting Minutes of May 17 and June 7, 1995 .................... A 2) Bimonthly Report ..................................... B 3) Committee Reports ..................................... C 4) Citizen Comments ..................................... D PUBLIC HEARINGS 5) Conditional Use Permit #006-95 of Bruce E. Welch for a veterinary hospital. This property is located at 689 Aylor Road (Route 647), in the Opequon District and is identified with PIN 75-A-38. (Mr. Miller) ......................................... E 6) Conditional Use Permit #007-95 of Matt E. Plasters for Automobile repair (interior headliner replacement service) without body repair. This property is located at 783 Marple Road (Route 654), in the Gainesboro District and is identified with PIN 41 -A -169G. (Mr. Miller) ................. F 7) Other .................................................G MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on May 17, 1995. PRESENT: Planning Commissioners preaent were Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; John R. Marker, Vice Chairman/Back Creek District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; Richard C. Shickle, Gainesboro District, Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: Terry Stone, Gainesboro District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; and Robert M. Sager, Board Liaison. Planning Staff present: Lawrence, Planner I; W. Tierney, Deputy Director. CALL TO ORDER Robert W. Watkins, Director and Secretary; Eric Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator; and Kris C. Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES - MEETING OF APRIL 19 1995 Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Thomas, the meeting minutes of April 19, 1995 were unanimously approved as presented. 2 uUN'T"ON 1 A L i, REP'O'RT Chairman Del avcn accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's information. COMMITTEE REPORTS Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee - 5/11/95 Mte. Mr. Thomas reported that the DRRS discussed minor and major collector road development standards and came to the conclusion that separate development standards were needed for each. He said that if the standards are amended appropriately for the category of traffic using the road, it will allow roads to be constructed economically and will help the total road system. Comprehensive Plans & Programs Committee - 5/8/95 Mtg. Mrs. Copenhaver reported that there was a good turn -out for the Round Hill Community Meeting on May 8, 1995. Mrs. Copenhaver said that reactions were mixed --some residents would like to see water and sewer, but most do not want to see any development. She said that some people do not care if they get water and sewer because they are happy with their wells and septics. Mrs. Copenhaver said that the general consensus was that if development occurs, they wanted it back at the interchange on Route 37 and not in the Round Hill community. Historic Resources Advisory Board - 5/16/95 Mtg. Mr. Morris said that the HRAB met with school administration officials to review the Redbud Run Elementary School site plan. He said the HRAB also approved an application for a historic plaque for the Kennelworth property. 3 Sanitation Authority - 5/17/95 Mfg. Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the Sanitation Authority was interested in the results of the Round Hill community meeting. She said that the Sanitation Authority began review of the plans for the their new headquarters on Route 642 with their architect, Dave McClure, and engineer, Charles W. Maddox. Winchester City Planning Commission - 5/9/95 (WkSession) & 5/16/95 Mr. Shickle reported that the City Planning Commission is working on rewriting the outdoor storage and display of merchandise for sale ordinance. DISCUSSION REGARDING POSSIBLE REZONING ON SENSENY ROAD No Action Mr. Tierney presented a letter from Mr. Bill Cowley, the owner of a 3/4 acre parcel located at the northeastern corner of the Greenwood-Senseny Road intersection. Mr. Tierney said that the parcel is currently the location of a small convenience store, with gas pumps, which is a legal non -conforming use and Mr. Cowley is interested in building a larger store at the site. Mr. Tierney said that the parcel is adjacent to RA (Rural Areas) Zoning to its north and east, RP (Residential Performance) Zoning to the south across Senseny Road, and B2 (Business General) Zoning across Greenwood Road. Mr. Bill Cowley said that his main interest in rezoning is bank financing. Discussion between the staff and Commissioners determined that gas pumps were not a permitted use in the B1 (Business Limited) Zoning District; and therefore, under the current ordinance, Mr. Cowley would need B2 Zoning. Commissioners felt that a convenience store with gasoline pumps would be suitable for that location, however, some of the other B2 uses would be objectionable. The staff said that they would research the ordinance to see if B1 Zoning might be a better approach. 4 DISCUSSION REGARDING REDBUD RUN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Action - Approved Staff Request for Administrative Approval Authority Mr. Tierney said that representatives of the School Board were present to acquaint the Commission with the proposed Redbud Run Elementary School site plan for their property on Berryville Avenue. Mr. Tierney said that the site is located in an area where the Third Battle of Winchester occurred. He said that the Battlefield Network Plan, a document being prepared by the Battlefield Task Force, indicates that a portion of the School Board's property is located adjacent to areas delineated as primary and secondary preservation areas. He added that the main entrance to the property would be adjacent to the Greenwood Road intersection and the staff anticipates there would need to be some major improvements to that intersection and, at some point, a traffic light. He said that the plan also shows a connection to the Caleb Heights property to the west. Mr. Tierney said that if that property is acquired and becomes battlefield, the County may not want that connection, but it will be there if it's needed. Mr. Thomas R. Malcolm, Superintendent of Frederick County Schools, and Mr. Thomas Sullivan, Assistant Superintendent of Frederick County Schools, were both present to discuss the plans for the new school. Mr. Malcolm presented the plan to the Commission and pointed out the location for the building, roads, parking areas, etc. He said that the building design is a replication of Indian Hollow, Middletown, and Armel Schools and will accommodate approximately 750 students. Mr. Malcolm said that the size of the school will be approximately 73,000 square feet. He added that the Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) offered recommendations concerning this site and the School Board is very willing to accommodate all of those recommendations. Mr. Morris, member of the HRAB, said that the HRAB discussed this project at their meeting of May 16, 1995. He said that the HRAB feels that historical and archeological surveys should be conducted on the property, however, the HRAB does understand that time does not permit such studies to occur for the elementary school portion of the property (which consists of approximately 24 of the 127 acres). Mr. Morris said that the proposed school is in the core area identified by the National Park Service, but outside of what the HRAB has identified as "preservation area. " He said that the HRAB felt that the future development of the remaining 103 acres will be of greater concern because it is located closer to the focal point of the battle and is adjacent to areas identified as primary and secondary preservation areas. Mr. Morris noted for the Commission the three items the HRAB recommended that the School Board address prior to any land disturbance. The Planning Commission was in agreement with the HRAB's recommendations and noted that the School Board was willing to accommodate all of the recommendations. They had no other outstanding issues with the proposal. Upon motion made by Mr. Romine and seconded by Mr. Ours, 5 BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously grant the Planning Staff administrative approval authority for the School Board's Redbud Run Elementary School Project based on the comments received from the Historic Resources Advisory Board, as follows: 1. Review any existing historical and archeological surveys which have been conducted on the elementary school site. These surveys may have been conducted by the Civil War Institute of Shenandoah University and/or the Battlefield Task Force. Based on these previously conducted reviews, a better understanding of the site may be gained. 2. Organize a group of local historians and archaeologists and allow them to walk the site prior to any land disturbance. This would enable them to locate and retrieve any artifacts which may still be on the site. 3. Establish a permanent display within the new elementary school to exhibit any artifacts found on the site. This would broaden the knowledge of both the school children and the surrounding community of the historical significance of the Third Battle of Winchester and specifically, the actions that occurred on the School Board property, some 130 years ago. Subdivision Application #002-95 of Winchester -Frederick County IDC for property located on the northeast corner of Shady Elm Road (Rt. 651) and Industrial Drive (Rt. 880) in the Back Creek District. Action - Approved Mr. Miller said that the proposed subdivision is part of an approved master development plan. He said that there were no problems with this application by any reviewing agencies, however, the City of Winchester commented on whether the proposed subdivision configuration best served the industrial park in the long run, given the proposed interchange at Route 651 and Route 37 as depicted on the pending Winchester Area Transportation Study (WATS). The City stated in their comments that by creating a deep lot fronting only along Route 651 in the area where an eastbound Route 37 on-ramp will go, the access will be undesirably close to the interchange and probably result in a total condemnation of the parcel. Mr. Miller said that the comments from the City of Winchester could not inhibit the approval process of this particular property, since there was no approved plan for the modification of Shady Elm Road (Rt. 651) or Route 37 at this time. Mr. Miller said that the applicant was aware of the City's comments. Mr. Morris commented that it would be beneficial to have an egress and ingress L of Route 37 into this industrial park because part of this property borders on the railroad track. Mr. Watkins said that the preliminary WATS plans suggest an interchange at this location which will certainly effect this particular property. Upon motion made by Mr. Morris and seconded by Mr. Romine, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve Subdivision Application #002-95 of Winchester -Frederick County IDC. For clarification purposes, Mr. Miller commented that the 20 -acre tract is owned by the IDC. He said that the IDC is dividing the 20 -acre tract into two parcels because they have a sale for the ten -acre parcel. Mr. Miller said that Subdivision Application #003-95 is a subdivision by the person who is buying the ten -acre tract to divide it into four parcels. Subdivision Application #003-95 of Winchester -Frederick County IDC. This property is located on the northeast corner of Shady Elm Road (Route 651) and Industrial Drive (Route 880) in the Back Creek District. Action - Approved Mr. Miller said that Subdivision Application #003-95 is part of an approved master plan for the IDC Industrial Park and is simply the division of the previously discussed ten -acre parcel into four lots. Mr. Miller said that the purchaser of the ten -acre parcel is Mr. Bruce Dawson. He said that Mr. Dawson has a client and will be submitting a site plan for development of one of those lots within the next week or two. Mr. Miller added that water and sewer to the site is supplied by the City of Winchester. Mr. Marker asked if the remaining acreage from the parcel would be accessed off Shady Elm Road. Mr. Miller replied that it may be feasible to extend Development Lane onto the other side. Mr. Marker said that if someone wanted to divide the remaining parcel into smaller parcels, there wasn't an industrial drive. Mr. Miller confirmed that it does restrict this parcel. Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Romine, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve Subdivision Application #003-95 of Winchester -Frederick County IDC. ADJOURNMENT p.m. VA No other business remained to be discussed and the meeting adi„ �nnpri at g;nrd Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Watkins, Secretary Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Court House in Winchester, Virginia on June 7, 1995. PRESENT: Planning Commissioners resent were Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; John R. Marker, Vice Chairman/Back Creek District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; Terry Stone, Gainesboro District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; Richard C. Shickle, Gainesboro District, Opequon District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Robert M. Sager, Board Liaison; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; and Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison. Planning Staff present: Robert W. Watkins, Director and Secretary; W. Wayne Miller, Zoning Administrator; Kris C. Tierney, Deputy Director; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Minutes Recorder. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES - MEETING OF MAY 3, 1995 Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mrs. Copenhaver, the meeting minutes of May 3, 1995 were unanimously approved as presented. 2 BIMONTHLY REPORT Chairman DeHaven accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's information. COMMITTEE REPORTS Battlefield Task Force Mr. Watkins announced a workession, sponsored by the Battlefield Task Force, to be held on June 22 at 7:30 p.m. at the School Board Offices with the County and City Boards, Commissions, and Councils, and the HRAB, to receive input on their proposed overall plan and strategy for battlefields. Mr. Watkins said that the BTF is encouraging everyone to attend. SUBDIVISIONS Subdivision Application #004-95 of Sue Yost to subdivide 7.78 acres, located at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Rt. 522) and Cumberland Trail Road (Rt. 694), and identified with PIN 06 -A -75I in the Gainesboro District. Action - Approved with Condition Mr. Miller said that there was no master development plan for this site and waiver of the master plan requirement is recommended by the staff. Mr. Miller said that the parcel being divided from the larger tract is zoned B2 and the larger, remaining parcel is zoned RA. He said that the larger, remaining parcel has frontage on both North Frederick Pike (Rt.522) and Cumberland Trail Road (Rt. 694). He said that the frontage on Cumberland Trail Road is only 80' in width. Mr. Miller explained that this will not allow further division of the remaining parcel utilizing only the Cumberland Trail Road frontage since the 250' width at the front setback line cannot be complied with. Mr. Miller added that the staff is recommending that a note be placed on the plat to reflect this restriction. Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin, with G. W. Clifford & Associates, the consulting engineers, said that they have no objections to placing a note on the plat as suggested by the staff. Mr. Gyurisin pointed out that the plat essentially follows the existing zoning district boundaries between the B2 and RA Zones. There were no other issues of concern raised by the Commission. 3 Upon motion made by Mr. Stone and seconded by Mr. Light, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve Subdivision Application #004-95 of Sue C. Yost contingent that a note be placed on the final plat to reflect that further division is not possible due to road frontage requirements. The Commission also waives the master development plan requirement for this subdivision. Subdivision Application #005-95 of Lenoir City Company of Virginia. This property is located at the intersection of McGhee Road and Kentmere Road in the Stonewall Industrial Park and is identified as P.I.N. 43-19-1 in the Gainesboro District. Action - Approved Mr. Miller said that there is an approved master development plan for the Stonewall Industrial Park where this lot is located. Mr. Miller said that Kentmere Court, which runs along the northwest side of this property, is built but not yet dedicated. He said that there are no known obstacles to the subdivision of this property. Mr. Thomas Gilpin, with Lenoir City Company of Virginia, was present to answer questions from the Commission. There were no issues of concern raised by the Commission. Upon motion made by Mr. Light and seconded by Mrs. Copenhaver, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve Subdivision Application #005-95 of Lenoir City Company of Virginia as presented. Subdivision Application #006-95 of RT&T Partnership to subdivide one 2.380706 acre parcel off the larger 29.6 acre tract. This property is located on Valley Pike (Rt. 11 South), approximately .5 miles south of the intersection of Route 37 and Valley Mill Pike, and is identified with P.I.N. 75 -A -2D in the Back Creek District. Action - Approved Mr. Miller stated that there was an approved master development plan for this site. He said that the slope of the land on this property clearly indicates a need for very careful storm 4 water management and control. He said that VDOT's comments indicated that a detention basin may be required on Lot 1 to reduce drainage impacts to Route 11 and that entrance design and drainage features on Prosperity Drive must meet VDOT's requirements, if it is to be eligible for addition into the State's Secondary System. Mr. Miller added that the County Engineer has suggested that consideration be given to regional stormwater management rather than on-site detention. Mr. Morris said that he was concerned about the number of entrances onto Route 11, for what is obviously needed for industrial or business development. He said that in light of this particular tract bordering on the railroad, he felt there was a potential for quite a bit of heavy traffic entering onto Route 11 at multiple locations, all trying to get to either I -S 1 or 37. Mr. Miller said that VDOT has a distance requirement between entrances on Route 11. He said that the distance requirements have obviously been met, since VDOT did not have any objections. Mr. Thomas Baker, a partner in RT&T Partnership, was present to answer questions from the Commission. The Commission felt there were no problems with allowing the requested subdivision as long as all the reviewing agency requirements were met. It was noted that the regional stormwater management will be handled at the site plan stage by the County Engineer and VDOT. Mr. Wilson said that he would abstain from voting on this matter due to a possible conflict of interest. Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Light, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve Subdivision Application #006-95 of RT&T Partnership to subdivide 29.6 acres with the requirement that all review agency comments are complied with. (Mr. Wilson abstained from voting.) REVISED REQUEST BY COVENTRY COURTS FOR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE SUBDIVISION RDINAN E REQUIREMENTS F R RB TTER & SIDEWALKS Action - Denied 5 Mr. Tierney said that at the Commission's May 3 meeting, a revision to the Coventry Courts master plan and a request for an exemption from the sidewalk requirements was discussed. Mr. Tierney said that the staff's recommendation was that the exception was not warranted and no hardship existed and the Commission concurred with that recommendation. Mr. Tierney stated that the request went to the Board of Supervisors, however, it was somewhat modified to place curb and gutter along both sides of Farmington Boulevard and a sidewalk along only one side. Mr. Tierney said that the ordinance requires sidewalks on both sides of the collector, however, it would not have required the curb and gutter. Mr. Tierney stated that the applicant was also proposing to put a wider pavement section along the cul-de-sac to serve as a bike/pedestrian path, as opposed to the required sidewalks. He said that in light of the changes from what the Commission had seen, the Board referred the plan back to the Commission. Mr. Tierney said that the staff has had discussions with the applicant and their representatives and currently, the proposal has changed somewhat again. Mr. Tierney said that the applicant is now willing to put sidewalks and curb and gutter on both sides of Farmington Boulevard, but rather than an exemption to the sidewalk requirements along the cul-de-sac, they are requesting that they be allowed to put in an alternative to sidewalks --a trail system along the western edge of the property. He explained that this alternative is permitted by the ordinance with approval by the Planning Commission. Mr. Tierney said that Abrams Point development, which has an approved MDP with a trail system, adjoins this project along its entire western edge. He explained that the Coventry Courts trail system would tie into Abrams Point's trail system. Mr. Tierney said that the staff feels this is a fairly reasonable proposal and recommends approval. Mr. Watkins clarified the requirements in the subdivision ordinance that, if all the lots are over 12,000 sq. ft., curb and gutter is not required; however, in order to eliminate sidewalks, the lots have to be over 15,000 sq.ft. He said that there is an area between 12,000 and 15,000 sq. ft. where you are required to have sidewalks, but not curb and gutter. Mr. Charles W. Maddox, Jr., with G.W. Clifford & Associates, the consulting engineers, came forward to represent the owner and applicant, Mrs. Elaine Longerbeam. Mr. Maddox explained that there was a high infrastructure cost associated with this development and he reminded the Commission of the bridge that is required to be built across the stream as part of this 34 -lot development. Mr. Maddox asked the Commission to exercise their discretion in not requiring an urban -type street sidewalk system for the cul-de-sac, but in light of some of the issues involved, that the Commission accept their proposal for a trail system that tied into a larger, overall plan of open space utilization. Chairman DeHaven called for public comment and the following person came forward: Mrs. Betty Winslow stated that she would like the Commission to vote in favor of curbs, gutters, and sidewalks for the entire subdivision because of the small lot size and to make the subdivision more attractive for the community and Frederick County. Mrs. Winslow G said that the trail connection that Mr. Maddox referred to is consistently used now for dirt bikes. After discussion with Mr. Maddox, the Commissioners determined that the trail system proposed would not be developed throughout Coventry Courts subdivision (would not contact the rear property lines on the western side or the cul-de-sac itself), but involved only a connection from Harold Court to the proposed trail system for Abrams Point. It would also extend out to Greenwood Road to access the proposed sidewalk along Greenwood Road. Commissioners pointed out that even though Greenwood Road is on the Six Year Secondary Road Plan and VDOT has stated that they would be interested in putting sidewalks along Greenwood Road, the County had no guarantee of when the road or the sidewalks would be constructed. Commissioners also noted that while the cost of the infrastructure may be initially high in a curb, gutter, and sidewalk development, they seem to sell well and are able to pay for themselves. They also noted that granting this exemption may set a precedence in other developments with cul-de-sac roads. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby encourage the developer of Coventry Courts to comply with the Subdivision Ordinance and provide curbs, gutters, and sidewalks, and denies the request for an exemption in lieu of a trail system. The vote on this request was as follows: YES (TO DENY THE EXEMPTION REQUEST IN LIEU OF A TRAIL SYSTEM Light, Copenhaver, Marker, Wilson, Thomas, Morris, DeHaven NO: Stone, Shickle (Mr. Ours and Mr. Romine were absent.) PUBLIC HEARINGS: Proposed Amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article XV, Historic Area Overlay Zone, Section 165-114, General Regulations Action - Tabled for 90 Days Mr. Tierney said that subsequent to advertising these amendments, the staff came to the conclusion that in addition to recommended guidelines for commercial construction in historic districts, it would probably be appropriate to also address residential construction and in particular, potential multi -family dwellings. Mr. Tierney asked that the Planning Commission table consideration of this amendment until the staff could revise it to encompass residential construction as well. Mr. Morris, a member of the HRAB, said that a certain amount of ambiguity was deliberately placed in these ordinances and the purpose in doing this was to allow free -thinkers and architects the opportunity to have tools to work with in a novel way. He said that rather than tell them what color, size, or shape, we wanted to place an intent and allow the architects some freedom through ambiguity in the ordinance to carry out the intent. Upon motion made by Mr. Light and seconded by Mr. Marker, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously table for 90 days consideration of the proposed amendment to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article XV, Historic Area Overlay Zone, Section 165-114, General Regulations, in order for the staff to include guidelines for residential development as well as commercial development. Conditional Use Permit #005-95 of Roy M. White for a cottage occupation for woodworking and furniture production. This property is located at 955 Round Hill Road (Rt. 803) and is identified with PIN 52-A-140 in the Back Creek District. Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions Mr. Miller said that this request can be considered as a cottage occupation since the applicant intends to live in the structure where he wants to conduct the woodworking and furniture -making business. He said that the structure was previously used as a combination residence and country store. Mr. Miller stated that the applicant has advised him that the Health Department approved a new well site and that he intends to have a new well drilled so that he has an adequate and reliable water supply. Mr. Miller said that this site has high visibility along Round Hill Road and it is important that materials associated with this business not be allowed in an outside storage area. He said that if properly controlled, this business should not have a significant impact on the neighborhood, since its location is a considerable distance from any other residence. Commissioners asked if there were any old fuel storage tanks in the area. Mr. Roy M. White, the owner and applicant, said that the fuel tanks were removed last July. Mr. White said that they were inspected by a federal monitoring agency and all requirements were complied with. He said that the comment from VDOT is in reference to the hole that was left when the tanks were removed. Mr. White explained that the hole was filled with gravel, but will need to be patched. Chairman DeHaven called for public comments and the following person came forward to speak: Mr. Charles A. Suit, Jr., adjoining property owner, said that he was not in opposition as long as there would be no work from 12:00 midnight to 6:00 a.m. The Planning Commission recommended that a condition of the permit be added limiting the hours of operation from 6:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. and this was acceptable to the applicant and the adjoining neighbor. No other concerns were raised. Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mrs. Copenhaver, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit #005-95 of Roy M. White for a cottage occupation for woodworking and furniture production with the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2. No open outside storage is permitted unless screened, in accordance with the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. 3. All work shall be accomplished inside of the completely enclosed building. 4. Prevent any dust or noise pollution from emanating into the neighborhood. 5. Hours of operation shall be limited to between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. Rezoning Application #002-95 of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority to rezone 3.4087 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B2 (Business General) District. This property is located on Macedonia Church Road (Rt. 642) approximately 1,800' from the intersection of Route 37 and is identified with PIN 75-1-A in the Shawnee District_ Action - Recommended Approval Mr. Tierney said that this is a request on the part of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority to rezone property for their new proposed headquarters. He said that the M property is located within the Urban Development Area and is in close proximity to an I-81 interchange area. He explained that the parcel is adjoined on two sides by B2 Zoning and is the site of the recently constructed water storage tank. Mr. Tierney stated that the Sanitation Authority proposes to construct three buildings on the site, totaling under 10, 000 square feet and the anticipated trip generation would be a fraction of the potential maximum for B2 Zoning. Mr. Charles W. Maddox, Jr., with G. W. Clifford & Associates, the consulting engineers, said that this proposal is in conformance with the master development plan that was submitted when the water storage tank was constructed. Commissioners had questions on the number of entrances proposed for Route 642 and whether or not a deceleration lane was planned. Mr. Maddox replied that only one entrance on Route 642 was proposed. He noted that the traffic generation would be light, as there would only be 30-50 employees. He said that they are proposing a right -lane turn -in transition so that people can slow down and get off the road before they turn. There were no citizen comments. The Commission felt that given the adjoining zoning, the location of the parcel, and the proposed use, potential negative impacts of the proposed rezoning would be minimal. Upon motion made by Mr. Morris and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Rezoning Application #002-95 of the Frederick County Sanitation Authority to rezone 3.4087 acres from RA (Rural Areas) to B2 (Business General) District. CANCELLATION OF JUNE 23 MEETING Mr. Watkins said that there are no pending items for the Commission's June 23 meeting. Upon motion made by Mr. Light and seconded by Mr. Stone, the Commission unanimously agreed to cancel their June 23 meeting. ADJOURNMENT P. in. 10 No other business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 8=30 Respectfully submitted, Robert W. Watkins, Secretary Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Robert W. Watkins, Secretary SUBJECT: Bimonthly Report DATE: June 21, 1995 (1) REZONINGS PENDING: dates are submittal dates James Carroll 10/07/94 Shaw RP to B2 Wayne Ridgeway 04/05/95 Gain RA to B3 Fred. Co. Sanitation Auth. 05/15/95 Shaw RA to B2 (2) CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS PENDING• (dates are suLmittal dates (3) Roy M. White 05/12/95 woodworking/furniture Bruce E. Welch 05/25/95 veterinary hospital Matt Plasters 06/09/95 automobile repair w/o body repair (Interior) CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS APPROVED: (dates are approval dates) None (4) SITE PLANS PENDING: dates are submittal dates Wheatlands Wastewater Fac. 09/12/89 Opeq Trmt. facility Grace Brethren Church 06/08/90 Shaw Church Flex Tech 10/25/90 Ston Light Industrial Red Apple Deli 05/01/95 Opeq Deli Lenoir City Co. (Lot 16) 05/11/95 Ston Warehouse Lakeview Townhouses V,VI,VII 05/19/95 Shaw Townhouses Frederick Co. Landfill 05/23/95 Shaw Maintenance building HCMF Devl. Corp. 05/30/95 Ston Additions Fred. Co. Sanitation Auth. Regency Lakes Estates Redland United Methodist Inn at Vaucluse Spring 2 06/07/95 Shaw 06/07/95 Ston 06/08/95 Gain 06/13/95 Opeq (5) SITE PLANS APPROVED: (dates are approval dates) Mad Bomber 06/01/95 Shaw Hoss' Steak & Seafood House 06/07/95 Shaw Church of Christ Mt. View 06/09/95 Back K&J Investments 06/09/95 Ston (6) SUBDIVISIONS PENDING: (dates are submittal dates) Briarwood Est. 01/04/94 Ston Headquarters Manufactured Housing Church Bed & Breakfeast Office/ Warehouse Restaurant Church Warehouse (7) SUBDIVISIONS PENDING FINAL ADMIN.. APPROVAL: (PIC or BOS approval dates) Abrams Point, Phase I 06/13/90 Shaw Harry Stimpson 10/26/94 Opeq Hampton Chase Section I 11/02/94 Ston Winc. - Fred. IDC 05/03/95 Back Winc. - Fred. IDC 05/11/95 Back Sue Yost 06/14/95 Gain Lenoir City Co. 06/07/95 Gain RT&T Partnership 06/07/95 Back (8) PRELIMINARY MASTER DEV. PLANS PENDING: (dates are submittal dates) None (9) FINAL MASTER DEV. PLAN PENDING ADMIN. APPROVAL: (BOS aprvl dates) Battlefield Partnership 04/08/92 Back James R. Wilkins III 04/14/93 Shaw Regency Lakes Est.(revised) 05/24/95 Ston Fieldstone Heights 08/10/94 Ston 10) 11) 3 VARIANCES PENDING: (dates are submittal dates) Rick Shanholtz, Sr. 06/21/95 Ston VARIANCES APPROVED: (dates are approval dates) Exxon Corp. 06/20/95 Ston Christopher Jennings 06/20/95 Ston 1E. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #82 (May 16-31) 1. Transportation Evan Wyatt continued working with the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee, developers, and design firms on the current standards for minor collector roads. Evan Wyatt and Eric Lawrence originated a study which will review the relationship between existing and future traffic signalization along arterial roads with existing commercial, industrial, and residential entrances. The purpose of this study will be to determine where arterial road access problems are occurring, advise VDOT representatives of these areas, and work with VDOT and the property owners to mitigate the problem areas. 2. Historic Preservation Bob Watkins met with June Wilmot to discuss the battlefield network plan. 3. Plan Reviews Approvals. and Site Inspections: Evan Wyatt reviewed a site plan for a new warehouse facility in the Stonewall Industrial Park on Kentmere Court, and revisions to the First Virginia Square site plan, the State Farm Insurance Office site plan, the K & J Investments site plan, the Hoss's Steak and Sea Restaurant site plan, and the Regency Lakes Estates Master Development Plan Evan Wyatt conducted site inspections for the Price Club, the Village at Sherando townhouse development, NAPA Truck Parts, the Kraft warehouse facility located in the Stonewall Industrial Park, the Lakeside Condominium development, and the Fellowship Bible Church. Jean Moore reviewed the Mad Bomber site plan and the site plan for Carroll Construction for an additional storage building. 4. Board of Zoning Appeals The following variances were approved by the Board of Zoning Appeals on May 16, 1995: #005-95; Lewis & Associates were granted a 25' height variance to construct a church at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522) and Cross Junction Road (Route 693). #006-95; Lewis & Associates were granted a variance that exempts them from the buffer and screening requirements in order to construct an additional storage building for Payne's well drilling business. 5. GIS and Mapping Example data sets have been created in a GIS format for Tax Map 62 and data bases are being constructed. The conversion and input have been a success and work is continuing to convert other AutoCAD mapping to GIS. An intern, Wendy Baldwin, has been hired for the summer. Her work priorities will be digitizing and drawing -in new data from flood hazard maps, wetlands, historic data and soils for use in the GIS. There has been an increase in structure numbering during this report period. Several new road names will be entered into the system. 6. Meetings Evan Wyatt met with Steve Gyurisin to discuss site plan requirements for the Carroll Construction site located on Ebert Road; met with David McClure to discuss site plan requirements for an addition to Macedonia Church; and met with Graham Lee Nelson to discuss proffer requirements for the Staples property located at the intersection of Double Church Road and Fairfax Pike. Kris Tierney attended a meeting with Mr. Riley, June Wilmot, Mr. Dailey and Tim Youmans, at the Economic Development Office, to discuss the possibilities for locating a regional office of the Division of Historic Resources within the Winchester -Frederick County area. Kris met with Steve Gyurisin to discuss details of the Master Development Plans for Valley Mill Estates and Coventry Courts. A site visit to the Coventry Courts property was necessary in order to resolve some questions. Kris and other planners met with Steve Stiefel of the Winchester office of the State Health Department to discuss new State regulations which go into effect in July. The new regulations will allow spray irrigation as a means of discharge for individual residential sewage treatment systems. Eric Lawrence met with Glenn Williamson to discuss numerous inoperable vehicle zoning violations. As a result of noncompliance with the zoning ordinance, criminal complaints have been filed against four property owners. Wayne Miller and Eric Lawrence met with representatives from the North-South Skirmish Association to discuss the activities occurring on the Associations' property. The Association is contemplating the possibility of applying for a Conditional Use Permit. 7. Professional Development Jean Moore attended the Virginia Association's certification program in Blacksburg, Virginia. 8. Other Bob Watkins met with members of the review panel to develop criteria for the evaluation of the proposals for the county offices. At a subsequent meeting, the panel conducted an initial review of the proposals. IE_ PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT - ACTIVITY REPORT #83 June 1-1t)) 1. Transportation Bob Watkins attended the meeting of the Transportation Technical Committee of the Lord Fairfax Planning District Commission. On June 15, Kris Tierney met with representatives of VDOT, the Sanitation Authority, Potomac Edison, Bell Atlantic, Adelphia Cable, Shenandoah Gas, G.W. Clifford & Associates, and Supervisor Smith to discuss coordination of utility conduit installation for the Route 642 relocation project. 2. Plan Reviews, Approvals and Site Inspections" Kris Tierney reviewed a revised submission of the final Master Development Plan for Valley Mill Estates. Clifford & Associates were notified of two items which needed correction prior to receiving final approval. Evan Wyatt reviewed site plans for the new Redbud Run Elementary School located on Berryville Pike; a new maintenance facility at the Frederick County Landfill; and revisions to the Van Guilder's Nursing Home addition located at the end of Pennsylvania Avenue. Evan approved site plans for the Hoss's Steak and Sea House Restaurant located on Millwood Pike; K & J Investments warehouse and office facilities located on Welltown Road; and the Church of Christ at Mountain View gymnasium and classroom addition located on Valley Pike. Evan also conducted site inspections at the Bank of Clarke County on Senseny Road, and at the Handy Mart/Tastee Freeze located on Millwood Pike. 3. Meetings Bob Watkins, Clay Grant, and Mark Lemasters met with Commissioner of the Revenue, Ellen Murphy, to discuss the provision of maps and data to support the general reassessment. Bob Watkins and Wayne Miller met with Don Hague to discuss townhouse design issues. Bob Watkins attended three Community Needs Assessment meetings of the United Way. Bob Watkins and Kris Tierney met with Mr. Chuck Maddox and others to discuss the Coventry Courts development. Bob Watkins and Kris Tierney attended the Chamber of Commerce breakfast meeting on June 7. The discussion topic was Historic Preservation as a key component of economic development. Kris Tierney met with Mr. John Scully to discuss the possibility of rezoning approximately 100 acres on the north side of Senseny Road, just east of the Greenwood Road intersection, for residential development. Kris met with Mr. Steve Gyurisin to discuss the pending Ridgeway rezoning on Route 522 North. Kris Tierney and Wayne Miller met with Mr. Eds Coleman, Mr. Steve Butler, and Mr. Ralph Shockey to discuss a proposed Boundary Line Adjustment between a portion of the land included in the Star Fort master plan and the Shockey Company. On June 8, Kris met with VDOT and G. W. Clifford representatives to discuss coordinating utilities on the Route 642 project. Evan Wyatt met with representatives of Greenway, Inc. to discuss site plan requirements for a new truck staging area and warehouse addition at the Shockey Company located on Martinsburg Pike. Evan met with Chuck Maddox, of G. W. Clifford & Associates, to continue work on new standards for minor collector roads. Jean Moore and Evan Wyatt met with representatives of the Vaucluse Bed and Breakfast to discuss site plan requirements, conditional use permit requirements, and future development requirements. 4. Other Bob Watkins participated in the interviews of office building design -build contractors. P/C Review Date: 07/05/95 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #006-95 BRUCE E. WELCH VETERINARY HOSPITAL LOCATION: This property is located at 689 Aylor Road, Stephens City, Virginia. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Opequon PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 75-A-38 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance); Land Use - Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RP (Residential Performance); Land Use - residential; B1 (Business General); Land Use - church PROPOSED USE: Veterinary Hospital REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: No objection to a conditional use permit for this property. However, prior to operation of business a commercial entrance must be constructed to our minimum standards to allow for safe egress and ingress of the property. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. The permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Inspections Department: Building shall comply with Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 304, Use Group B (Business) of the BOCA National Building Code 1993. Other codes that apply are Title 24 Code of Federal Page 2 Welch CUP #006-95 Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities. Need to show ADA parking and access to the building (min. one van accessible ADA parking space). Fire Marshal: Access to buildings must be maintained at all times. This structure would create no greater fire hazard potential than a large single family dwelling. Approval of this CUP will not significantly impact fire and rescue resources. Health Department: Adequate public water and sewer must be provided for the new facility. Winchester Regional Airport: See Attached letter dated May 25, 1995 Sanitation Authority: Water and Sewer are available. See attached Drawings. Planning Department: In the most recent change to the zoning ordinance, Veterinary Offices, Veterinary Clinics or Veterinary Hospitals, excluding the boarding of animals for non-medical purposes, is permitted with an approved conditional use permit. The proposed site in this application is a very good one because of the frontage on a collector road (Aylor Road, Route 647) and the size of the property which provides enough area to install the necessary features such as parking, screening and some buffering. By ordinance, a business sign of the type needed for this use is not permitted. Staff believes it would be inappropriate to approve a business use and not permit a business sign for that use. The Commission will need to address this issue and it is suggested that a sign be allowed as part of the permit process and this would allow tight control on the size, height and location of the sign. Staff will address this issue with an ordinance amendment if the Commission desires. In this case, a monument type sign not to exceed 6 feet in height and a surface area not to exceed 20 square feet is recommended. This was discussed with the applicant and he suggested the 20 square foot figure as being adequate for his needs. Page 3 Welch CUP #006-95 More detailed study will be required to determine parking requirements, screening requirements and location and other feature requirements. This will be done during the site plan process. The existing house on the property will become accessory to the business if this permit is approved. RP Zoning only permits accessory dwellings if attached to the primary residence, however, one accessory dwelling shall be allowed with any business so long as it is occupied by the owner of the business, an employee or a watchman. In staff's opinion, if this permit is approved, the business is the allowed primary use on the property, and the existing house would need to meet the requirement of housing only the owner, an employee or a watchman. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR JULY 5,1995: Approval with the following conditions: 1. A site plan must be submitted and approved. 2. A business sign of a monument type not exceeding 6 feet in height and a maximum of 20 square feet will be allowed. 3. The use shall have a full screen to protect adjoining residential areas. Location and extent of screening to be determined by staff during site plan process. 4. Any proposed expansion beyond that approved on the original site plan will require a new conditional use permit and a revised site plan. 5. The proposed clinic or hospital must be connected to public sewer and water. 6. Compliance with all review agency comments must be completed prior to beginning operation. 7. Only animals recovering from surgical procedures shall be allowed to remain on premises overnight. 8. Animals recovering at the facility will only be permitted in the outside area for brief exercise periods. 9. Continuously barking dogs or other noises that may disturb the surrounding residential areas shall not be permitted. See 33 r, 78 1 9 327-41 lap �i 79 79A i+pgs} • w�t4 ��yyi'�tij IT sis ON �oA I V NINE j0 �m► ®� a Location Map for PIN: 75—A-38 Bruce Welch CUP#006-95 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS Winchester Regional Airport Attn: Executive Director 491 Airport Road Winchester, Virginia 22602 (703) 662-2422 The Winchester Regional Airport is located on Route 645, off of Route 522 South, if you prefer to hand deliver this review form. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Bruce R. W lrh. DVM (703) 869-3559 1904 Double Church Road, Stephens City, VA 22655 Name of development and/or description of the request: Application for C.U.P. allowing an Animal Hospital in Stephens City, VA. (Note: New facility construction) Location: 689 A for Road Stephens City. VA 22655. Located between Frederick Drive and Westmoreland Drive on A for Road. Winchester Regional Airports Comments: Airport Signature and Date: ��(� Y�1,� �k 41a9 ICS J (NOTICE TO AIRPORT. * PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM TO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of your plans and/or application form. -ff r17: [tel i� The owner must be made aware that the Airport will continue to be developed. This will certainly result in increased opera- tional activity by all types of aircraft on a 24-hour basis. To overcome additional noise frequency and sound levels, we strongly recommend that sound proofing be a major consideration when remodeling or expanding existing residential and commercial properties located within or adjacent to the Airport Support Area. The Airport Support Area is defined in the current edition of the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan. Questions concerning noise levels should be directed to the Executive Director, Winchester Regional Airport Authority. ., 4 .` DEFT, U rtAN'TV_ ui n ANG uL'rFR�M y I 04 REQUEST FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT COMMENTS u ~'Yn ^ter:;• j Frederick County Sanitation Authority Attn: Engineer Director P.O. Box 618 Winchester, Virginia 22604 (703) 665-5690 The Frederick County Sanitation Authority is located on Route 522 South, at 199 Front Royal Pike, if you prefer to hand deliver this review. Applicant's name, address and phone number: Bruce E. Welch,_ DVM (703) 869-3559 S,66 &9 7TC F &QR fW4v -�-8 1904 Double Church Road, Stephens City, VA 22655 Name of development and/or description of the request: Application for C.U.P. allowing an Animal Hospital in Stephens City, VA (Note: New facility construction) Location: 689 A for Road Stephens Citv, VA 22655, Located between Frederick Drive and Westmoreland Drive on A for Road. Sanitation Authority Comments: / 57 A.E V/•EW — W,$4T,c=lf Ail s.E'W,F,4 S,66 &9 7TC F &QR fW4v -�-8 Sanitation Authority Signature & :Date (NOTICE TO SANITATION AUTHORITY �RN�THIS�FOiFMTO APPLICANT.) NOTICE TO APPLICANT /, 95— It is your responsibility to complete this form as accurately as possible in order to assist the agency with their review. Also, please attach a copy of you application form, location map and any other pertinent information. vV,47kR L lnoF_ 5 b w� oll, 5 L l�t/ES ; ;�• r T /LC/�iyT bi' , COST yov 50��'% o NFy 7'0 JR4 wove / r e ,k° f I, ool 00' Ak v tiG v / /l Submittal Deadline U P/C Meeting ^� BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PFRMTT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the XX owner other) NAME: Bruce E. Welch. DVM ADDRESS: 1904 Double Church, Stephens City VA 22655 TELEPHONE (703) 869-3559 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: Bruce E. Welch, DVM 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) 689 Avlor Road, Stephens City, VA22655 Located between Robert E. Aylor ?-fiddle School and Bass -Hoover Elementary School. 4. The property has a road frontage of 208.86 feet and a depth of 431.00 feet and consists of 2.046 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Bruce E. Welch as evidenced by deed from Kevin J. & Pamela R. Mullen recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. 602 on page 413 , as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14 -Digit Property Identification No. -MAP 75A 38 Magisterial District Opequon Current Zoning RP 7. Adjoining Property: USE North Residential East Residential South Residential West Church & Open Field ZONING ^ ^ LS�% RP ?" RP RPfir; v1cn; B-1 .; y 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: A 2800-3000 sq. ft. Animal Hospital 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, rear and in front of (also across street from) the property where requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14 -;DIGIT NUMBER.) NAME Sheila & David Address Stephens City, VA 22655 Janelle Property ID# 75E00010300010 Thelma Newlin Address 102 Westmoreland Drive Stephens City, VA 22655 Property ID# 75E00010300020 Paul & Peggy Goode Address 229 Accomack Drive Stephens City, VA 22655 Property ID# 75E00010300030 William Layden Address 106 Westmoreland Drive Stephens City, VA 22655 Property ID# 75E00010300040 Lawrence & Karen Address 108 Westmoreland Drive Compher Stephens City,VA 22655 Property ID# 75E00010300050 Wanda & Jacob Address 204 Accomack Ave. Ricker Stephens City, VA 22655 Property ID# 75E00010300060 NAME Deborah Brumback Address 206 Accomack Ave. Ste hens Cit VA 22655 Property ID# 75E00010300070 Louis & Nina Hoover Address 228762 Frederick Road Stephens City. VA 22655 Property ID# 74B00030100010 Thomas & Kathleen Gallo Address 200 Red Crest rive Martinsburg, WV 25401 Property ID# 74B00030100020 Thomas & Karen Gallo Address 2004 Red Crest Drive Martinsburg, WV 25401 Property ID# 74B00030100030 Larry & Ann Flessner Address 107 Frederick Road Stephens City, VA 22655 Property ID# 74B00030100040 —J Address Property ID# Address Property ID# P.. Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. PLEASE SEE ATTACHED PAGES C - - • s � G tai - 1. _ - �c . _ - - -- r_t_ - - - • i A- -�o6 90pR 4,1_3 iD,E ivG 6a� g A•3 34 3 �o sctic� 204- 7,7 9 S; 047,795 \ A. �� cP ° �7 "" �J 18 1-7-70 G� 7 vO GL`s ►•� / P, o aoo S� �'�l�U GPnbtiC FCn•_r ee-v3e-o Owe 7, waf �,t c £3 ^a �S N THREEV TRICO ASSOCIATES, IIVC. p� ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORShet 1115 Leesburg. Pike Route J Box 269 �� C ATE No t / V . E3IIS Church. Yu inN 21013 Winchester. Virginia 22601 CERTIFI.- Certrlreile of Acknowledgement ; 11 \ *� �♦ ! : SHEET 3 OF ,7 Cerlrhe Correct Tz .cr) rn O `. to 23 I t L71 o{ 1 rrederfcktome, I Stion 3 3 TVC Box -. If- f Telephone e bac f Lot ec NOTES 2 TVC Box 1 Lot Telephone 431.00.. Telephone bac Creek and Carolyn J. Creek, his wife, to Wade E. Lautzenhelsa and gAM D. Lautzenheiser, his wife, by a deed ir'� dated September 30, 1985 and recorded Biri snt gla-sidw& —I in D.B.602, P.M. v es. 012 as shown on !ND Flood Inssrum - 1e.s.�.._.. used I F 4 porch , 2.2' V3 w I olrDeck - r • '— i� 2.046 ACRES ti ,C4I `NSE No Open-ftn' Ent. B parch - • 1 •3' Ewen Frame Bldg. Walk 192.r 1 Te !alk Block 36.2' I _ --- Garage ,r t N liar. N f Telephone e bac f - J NOTES 1. No Title Repoit Furnished. . T'Prey ihown on this Plat is that same prop" conveyed by Emest W. Creek and Carolyn J. Creek, his wife, to Wade E. Lautzenhelsa and gAM D. Lautzenheiser, his wife, by a deed ir'� dated September 30, 1985 and recorded in D.B.602, P.M. �c Y .3 3 . The property shown on this plat is located in Zone •C�, as shown on !ND Flood Inssrum lite Map, Commity-h+ri Umber 510063 a¢oo b, effective date of %Iy 17, 1976. a C2 ee = 4. This propertl.is shorn on Frederick toontr c co o «. Tax Asse"wl Ib. 75 - A - hrtal 38. ly V3 w I r„ �j blbtt Rhct►>e. Jr� ti `NSE No 1318 Lot i NVO' 26' 27' W �-42�3_351 Lot 2Lot S__/.•Drainagen NOUS: LOCATION w Fredericictoxne, Section PROPERTY OF Nude E. _ Laut eiser ' enh wM's is to certify that an May 13, 1991,1 made an accurate survey of the premises OPEOUON DISTRICT shown hereon and that there are no esoaements FREDERICK COUNTY, Y'IR 81 N I A or ancroachments visible an the ground other than time shown hereon.- SCALE :1 ' = 5 0 ' • MAY 13, 1981 RITCHIE SURVEYS F' R E D E R I C K ..R O A D WINCHESTER,' YIR61NIA CertifIed Correct To: KOVinJ k Pamol, tt v..11_.. ' 12. Additional comments, if any: It is my sincere hope to Construct, own and operate a Veterinary Hospital on this property which will provide basic health care and offer advanced surgical and medical services to the area. I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. /.70 � Pou l0- GG7-o.260 TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: P/C Review Date: 07/05/95 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 007-95 MATT E. PLASTERS AUTOMOBILE REPAIR WO BODY REPAIR (INTERIOR) LOCATION: This property is located at 783 Marple Road (Route 654), Winchester, Virginia. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 41 -A -169G PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Area); Land Use -Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Area); Land Use - residential and vacant. PROPOSED USE: Automobile repair without body repair (Interior) REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: VDOT's minimum sight distance requirements are not met at the existing entrance location to allow for safe egress/ingress of the property for business related traffic. However, we would have no objections to a conditional use permit being issued for the property provided no business related traffic is permitted. Also, the applicant will be required to upgrade the existing entrance to private entrance (VDOT PE -1) standards. The applicant will need to contact Mr. Steve A. Melnikoff at the local VDOT Office in Winchester to obtain a permit. Inspections Department: Building shall comply with Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 304, Use Group B (Business) of the BOCA National Building Code 1993. Other codes that apply are Title 24 Code of Federal Page 2 Plasters CUP #007-95 Regulation, Part 36 Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability by Public Accommodations and in Commercial Facilities. Change of use permit required for area of existing building that will be utilized for operation and storage. Fire Marshal: 1) Application form was not submitted for review, however, no proposed structures are shown on plat and applicant states on comment sheet that most work will occur off of this site. If no new buildings are to be constructed, fire and rescue resources will not be affected by approval of this CUP. If new construction is anticipated, please submit plan for review as fire department access could become an issue on this site. Health Department: No objection as long as owner is sole employee. Planning Department: Automobile repair without body repair is a permitted use in the RA zoning district with an approved CUP. Applicant is a specialist in replacing automobile interiors, mainly headliners. Most of his work is done at sites other than his residence, but he wants the capability and authorization to do some work in the attached garage at his home if the need arises. The applicant's residence is located approximately 300 yards back from Marple Road and cannot be seen from the road. The residence is totally screened by woodland and the closest residence is approximately 300 yards away. It does not appear that this use, if permitted, would have any impact on the neighborhood. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR JULY 5, 1995: Approval with the following conditions: All review agency comments must be complied with. 2. All work must be done inside the attached garage. 3. No outside storage of parts and/or materials shall be permitted. 4. Any planned expansion of the activity will require a new conditional use permit. CUP #007-95 PIN: 41 -A -169G MATT PLASTERS Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the owner other) NAME: MA -Ti r- �L�Si�nS ADDRESS : %j !�I rt2PL�. (�C�►� L�%; �C ri ZZ(�C 3 TELEPHONE L7c3) ��f�l - 5z3Z 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) 1A6F— StZ n) F5 NiLL5 CL -7 or Wc:Jc juz,J C�Fi ark �� i fc Sy (-fl�`t oL� .J LF i 4. The property has a depth of 8,33. < <' (Please be exact) road frontage of feet and consists 'L5 -c. cc f eet and a of S. L. uG: acres. 5. The property is owned by M' -Tr F- 2- 3 as evidenced by deed from Z' ;z,}NK S, ms,;µ recorded (previous owner) in deed book no. R'�)> on page u15G as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. 14 -Digit Property Identification No. Magisterial District Clat-`.;d'r zo Current Zoning R A 7. Adjoining North East South West Property: USE ZONING V /31«N i 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) old „'! CC.J 5 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: �nl G�QTQc G�7 G�BLcSC l lC�� +.L'c -- wi d 10' de"e C.0 iai &c"r tc45 dle�;5�,�c ��CLi/Shcps) 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides, rear and in front of (also across street from) the property where requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: (PLEASE LIST COMPLETE 14 -DIGIT NUMBER.) NAME Kii, ^.• Address %q ZQL i 1A.1 N. i.�Q'4�t 3.L� Property ID# L11 - - /O 9 Address '7 Property ID# Address Property ID# Ll Address Property ID# Address Property ID# Address Property ID# 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. 12_ Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. 063) aZ-5-23Z TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: