Loading...
PC 10-16-96 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Old Frederick County Courthouse Winchester, Virginia OCTOBER 16,1996 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER - TAB 1) Minutes of September 18, 1996 Meeting ................................... A 2) Bi -Monthly Report .................................................... B 3) Committee Reports ................................................... C 4) Citizen Comments .................................................... D PUBLIC MEETINGS 5) Master Development Plan #008-96 of G. W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. for "Carriebrooke." This property is located on the east side of Rt. 642, south of the intersection of I-81/37 at Kernstown and north of Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority headquarters, and identified with Property Identification Number 75-A-89. This parcel is zoned B2 (Business General) and RA (Rural Areas) and is located in the Shawnee Magisterial District. (Mr. Ruddy) ......................................................... E 6) Master Development Plan #009-96 of G. W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. for Frederick County/I-81 Industrial Park. This property is located on the east side of Route 11 South, ''/z mile north of Route 37 and Route 11 intersection and behind existing Potomac Edison office, and identified with Property Identification Number 63-A-86. This parcel is zoned M2 (Industrial General) and is located in the Back Creek Magisterial District. (Mr. Lawrence) ...................................................... F 2 DISCUSSION ITEMS 7) 1997-1998 Secondary Road Improvement Plan Public Hearing Summary A summary of the public hearing which was held September 10, 1996, for the Secondary Road Improvement Plan, which is a prioritized list of road projects and is used by VDOT to determine which projects will be funded in a given year. (Mr. Wyatt) ......................................................... G 8) Planning Commission Tabling Procedures Final action on Planning Commission Tabling Procedure Amendments (Mr. Wyatt)......................................................... H 9) Other File: K.\R'P\CN1M96C0%-ERS\PC10 16AGN MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Old Frederick County Courthouse in Winchester, Virginia on September 18, 1996. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; John R Marker, Vice- Chairman/Back Creek District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Terry Stone, Gainesboro District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; Jimmie K. Ellington, Gainesboro District; George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; Robert M. Sager, Board Liaison; Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: Richard C. Ours, Opequon District STAFF PRESENT: Kris C. Tierney, Interim Planning Director, Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II; Eric R. Lawrence, Planner I; and Carol Gordon, Minutes Recorder, CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES OF AUGUST 21 1996 Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Wilson, the minutes of August 21, 1996 were unanimously approved as presented. BIMONTHLY REPORT Chairman DeHaven accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's information. COMMTPTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the information that was requested at the Planning Commission's joint meeting with the Board of Supervisors regarding sewer in Stephenson will be presented this evening to Commission members. Transoortation Committee - 09/10/96 Mtg. Mr. Thomas reported that the committee reviewed the Secondary Road Plan and this will be forwarded to the Commission on October 16. Sanitation Authority (SA) - 09/17/96 Mtg. Mrs. Copenhaver reported the following: the extension of sewer out Boundary Lane has begun; Miller Heights will probably be bid at the next meeting; the Route 522 facilities are complete and in service; Hurricane Fran did not create any problems with Parkins Mill or the old water treatment plant, however, the quarry water is up; the SA adopted a resolution supporting the Virginia Association of Municipal Water Treatment Agencies regarding reduction of nutrients; and it was reported that according to a national survey of up-to-date, well -operated sewage treatment plants, 43% of well-designed systems contain ground water. Winchester Planning Commission Mr. DiBenedetto reported that the City Planning Commission is currently active in their review of the Comprehensive Plan. KERNSTOWN BATTLEFIELD RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN ACTION - RECOMMENDED APPROVAL Mr. Lawrence said that OCULUS, formerly known as West Main Design Collaborative (WMDC), has submitted the completed Kernstown Battlefield Resource Management Plan and he presented this plan to the Commission. Mr. Lawrence stated that the plan was funded partially by a grant from the National Park Service's American Battlefield Protection Program, and was received by the County two years ago. Mr. Lawrence explained that this final version of the Kernstown Battlefield Plan incorporates elements ranging from the site's role in the Civil War to visitor access and interpretation. He said that the plan proposes that interpretive zones be designated based on battles, farming characteristics, and the Pritchard House area and separate historical stories on each of these zones will combine together to interpret the overall story behind the Grim Farm during the Civil War Era. Mr. Lawrence added that the resource management portion of the plan addresses issues such as protection of natural features and physical structures on the property. He said that the overwhelming theme behind the pian is to protect, preserve, and promote the cultural, historical, and natural characteristics of the site for others to enjoy and learn from. Mr. Lawrence next reviewed the maps and proposed phases of the plan in detail for the Commission. Questions raised by the Commission included whether the plan needed to be forwarded to and endorsed by the National Park Service (NPS). Mr. Lawrence stated that upon receiving the County's endorsement, the plan will be forwarded to the NPS to show them the final product that was produced from the grant money received. Members of the Commission felt that with the completion of this plan, the historic value of the property will be established and a foundation laid for future plans. Some members felt that the grant money spent was an excellent investment. Upon motion made by Mr. Ellington and seconded by Mr. Light, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously accept the final version of the Kernstown Battlefield Plan as presented and does hereby forward the plan to the Board of Supervisors for final adoption. DISCUSSION REGARDING CORRIDOR APPEARANCE & DESIGN STANDARDS Mr. Wyatt stated that the Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) has been directed to examine design standards regarding the County's corridors going into the City of Winchester. He said that this topic has surfaced recently because of the proposed activities along the Route 50 West corridor; however, it was decided that the design standards in general needed to be discussed. Mr. Wyatt said that the DRRS is interested in making sure the Planning Commission is aware of the ideas being discussed and to receive input as well. Mr. Wyatt stated that the DRRS has recommended that limitations be established for specific site design features, such as entrance spacing requirements, signs, parking lot locations and setbacks, landscaping enhancements, and utilities. He noted that the DRRS is not interested in establishing architectural standards. Mr. Wyatt next presented slides to the Commission. Members of the Commission felt that salesmanship of the proposed Corridor Design Standards will be an important consideration. They felt the standards should not be viewed as simply governmental. action forced upon the development community. It was pointed out that the impetus first came from the Chamber of Commerce and the Economic Development Commission who said they had prospects reject this area because the prospects were turned off by the appearance of one of the entrances into the City. It was felt by the Commission that the impetus was more than just an aesthetic entrance into the City, but had everything to do with attraction and support of a business community. Members of the Commission asked what VDOT's position on this issue was. Mr. Wyatt said that the County's entrance spacing requirements far exceed VDOT's requirements. He said that VDOT is usually very cooperative and agreeable to working with local governments in support of their plans. He said that VDOT's concern generally is with vegetative plantings, particularly at the entranceway adjoining their right-of-way, and they have a height requirement for visibility. Another issue raised by the Commission was nonconforming status; for example, if a structure was destroyed, could it be rebuilt according to the old setback standards or would the new standards apply. Mr. Wyatt stated that for all legally nonconforming structures, there is a certain grace period to re-establish business. He said that if the business is not re-established within that time frame, then the new guidelines would have to be adhered to. Staff noted that there was dialogue with members of Top of Virginia Builders Association and designers, etc. and the feedback had been positive. Mr. Wyatt said that these groups are amenable to "beefing up" the standards, provided that plan reviews are not prolonged and they are allowed some flexibility, depending on the site. Regarding whether dialogue had been held with the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), Mr. Wyatt noted that when the Interstate Area Overlay Design Project was started a couple years ago, the DRRS felt it prudent to have a liaison from the BZA. Mr. Wyatt said that they still receive copies of our agendas, but have not been attending recent meetings. In conclusion, the Planning Commission was in agreement with all the main components presented by the staff. No formal action was made at this time. OTHER PROVISION OF SEWER SERVICE TO STEPHENSON Mr. Lawrence said that during the joint worksession on August 28, 1996, reference was made to providing sewer to the Stephenson community and the Sanitation Authority was contacted to generate cost figures. Mr. Lawrence said that in generating the estimates, the Sanitation Authority assumed that sewer existed along Route 11, specifically at the intersection of Routes 11 and 664. He said that the estimates were also generated under the assumption that all existing residences (about 180) would use the sewer. He said that the Sanitation Authority determined that, using the least expensive method, a small -diameter pressure line with pumps for each connection should be used and the total projected cost would be $1.3 million, or approximately $7,200 per residence. Chairman DeHaven asked if it was the staffs understanding that a pump for each tap is recommended and if so, if the cost was included in the residential fee? Mr. Tierney said that the staff is currently attempting to clarify that with the Sanitation Authority. Mr. Thomas felt that the Commission should not be overly concerned with the cost figures on this. He felt the Commission's role was to provide a planning service that is in the best interests of the residents of the community. He also felt that if the Commission plans development in this area and it precludes some future use, then they did not do a good job of planning. He stated that the Commission should plan for any future potential use with ability to grow and if part of that is planning for residential sewage and water, then it should be planned for. He added that the main line going up Route 11 should be designed for enough capacity for future residential development. Mr. Tierney said that the Planning staffs position is that it deals with land use by focusing on compatibility, traffic, etc. Mr. Tierney stated that if Stephenson is to be included in the Sewer and Water Service Area, that is in and of itself another land use study. He said that the staff's position is that the plan developed right now deals with land use along the Route 11 Corridor, and it attempts to generate some industrial development potential; however, it does not include Stephenson. Mr. Tierney said that the Sanitation Authority was asked if there was capacity for the Stephenson area and they have said yes. He said that the Sanitation Authority provided us with three different ways that it could be served. Mr. Tierney felt that it was not the Planning Department's, nor the Commission's responsibility, to try and figure out the best way to do it. He said that it will happen if it is marketably feasible. Mr. Tierney said that what this plan is saying is that when and if it does become marketably feasible, this is the way we want it to happen. Mr. Tierney added that he didn't think the Commission needed to worry about when the capacity will be available, who will pay for it, or how it was going to happen. Mr. Morris asked if the Commission may be copping out if they simply say, "well, we've done our part." He asked what would happen if the area began to develop and then it was determined that sewer capacity wasn't available. Mr. Morris said that he knew it was not the Commission or the staffs job to design and build sewer systems, however, he did not want to mislead an economic development community, residents, rural community centers, or anybody else, simply because our land use plan was based on a lot of "what ifs." Mr. Morris noted that capital planning in this County was tied to the Comprehensive Plan and maybe sewer should also, to a greater extent. Mr. Tierney stated that the capacity is at the Opequon Plant. He said that the existing lines along Route 7 may not be all that is needed to serve this area and certainly not further north to Clearbrook. He stated that if Stephenson and Brucetown are to be served, there would have to be another line extended up there. Mr. Tierney reiterated that the Commission needed to say that however and whenever the sewer gets there, this is what we would want to see happen. Mr. Tierney felt there was a division of responsibility there in terms of how detailed it could become in terms of the Comprehensive Plan. Presentation on Community Aesthetics Mr. Tierney announced that a presentation by Mr. Ed McMann will take place at Shenandoah University on October 30, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. on community aesthetics. Mr. Tierney said that he would provide the Commission with further information about the talk. ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned by unanimous vote at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Kris C. Tierney, Interim Planning Director Charles S. DeHaven, Chairman BIMONTHLY REPORT OF PENDING APPLICATIONS (printed October 3, 1996) Application newly sub MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS: .Carrieb,60W (Mmog. F S' - 35 SF Det. Urban Residential on 1 15.04 acres (RP) Location: Ea. of Macedonia Ch. Rd; So. of 1-81/37 intrsctn at Kernstown; No. of Sanitation Authority Hdqrtrs. Submitted: 09/23/96 PC Review: 10/16/96 BOS Review: 11/13/96 - tentatively scheduled Chapel Hill (MDP #006-96)Shawnee F S' - 35 SF Det. Urban Residential on 1 15.04 acres (RP) Location: Ea East side of Rt. 522 So.; 700' south of Lon croft Rd. Submitted: 06/10/96 PC Review: 07/03/96 - recommended approval BOS Review: 08/14/96 - approved Admin. Approved: 09/ 17/96 Mosby Station, Sect. I & H (MDP #005-96) Opequon 102 SF Detached Residential on 36.12 acres (RP) Location: Between old Rt. 642 & relocated Rt. 642 Submitted: 05/02/96 PC Review: 06/05/96 - recommended approval BOS Review: 07/10/96 - approved Admin. Approved: Awaiting completion of review agency comments Hill Valley (MDP #001-96) Stonewall 54 SF Det. Cluster; 26.123 Ac. (R') Location: N.W. Corner of Valley Mill & Greenwood Rds. Submitted: 11/15/95 PC Review: 03/06/96 - Recommended Approval BOS Review: 05/13/96 - Approved Admin. Approved: 09/27/96 SUBDIVISIONS: Greenwood Rd. (SUB #007- 95) Shawnee Subdivision of 2.837 ac. into five lots (RP) Location: W. Side of Greenwood Rd (Rt. 656) approx. 1,400' north of Sensen Rd. (Rt. 657) intersection Submitted: 07/22/96 PC Review: 08/21/96 - Recommended Approval BOS Review: 09/11/96 - Approved Admin. Approval: Awaiting signed plats. towne Est. Sect. SUB #00496) Opequon 33 SF Trad. Lots on 9.9804 JAcres (RP) I East of Ste hens Ci ; N.E. of Sections 11-13 d: 05/02/96 7-88 Approved 12/05/88 Admin. Approval: Section 15 Pending; Section 14 Approved 07/30/96 Valley Mill Estates (SUB) Stonewall 21 SF Trad. Lots (RP) Location: No. Side of Valley Mill Rd. & East of Greenwood Rd. Submitted: 10/23/95 MDP #001-95 Approved 04/26/95 Pending Admin. AppE21ah J1 Awaiting bonding, signed plats, & deed of dedication Winc-Fred Co. IDC (SUB) Back Creek 2 Ml Lots (0.552 acres & 20.285 acres) Location: Southeast side of Development Lane Submitted: 09/08/95 MDP #003-87 Approved 07/08/87 Pending Admin. Approval Awaiting signed plats. RT&T Partnership (SUB) Back Creek 1 Lot - 29.6 Acres (B2) Location: Valley Pike (Rt. 11 So.) Submitted: 05/17/95 MDP #003-91 Approved 07/10/91 Pending Admin. Approval: Awaiting submission of signed plat & deed of dedication Briarwood Estates (SUB) Stonewall 20 SF Det. Trad. Lots (RP) Location: Greenwood Rd. Submitted: 01/03/94 MDP lf005-93 Approved 12/8/93 Pendia Admin. Approval:jl__Beingheld at applicants request. Abrams Point, Phase I (SUB) Shawnee 230 SF Cluster & Urban Lots (RP) Location: South side of Rt. 659 Submitted: 05/02/90 PC Review: 06/06/90 Approved BOS Review: 06/13/90 Ap2roved 11 Pending Admin. AppE2yah Awaiting deed of ded., letter of credit, and signed plat Harry Stimpson (SUB} O e uon Two B2 Lots Location: Town Run Lane Submitted: 09/23/94 PC Review: 10/19/94 Approved BOS Review: 1 10/26/94 Approved Pendia Admin. Approval: Awaiting signed plat. 4 SITE PLANS: Garrett Dentist Office (SP #040-96) Opequon Location: 2546 Martinsburg Pike Submitted: 09/19/96 Approved: - 1 Pending Garrett Dentist Office (SP #040-96) Opequon 3,120 sf office on 26,720 sf lot (BI) Location: Northeast intersection of Aylor Rd. & Hyde Ct. Submitted: 08/27/96 Approved: Pending Premier Place Travel Agency & Residence Shawnee Off: 500 sf; Resid. 2,000 sf; on (SP #041-96) 15,967 sf lot (132) 1 Location: 133 Premier Place Submitted: 08/27/96 Approved: ______jl Pending Preston Place T.H. Phase H (SP #039-96) Shawnee 44 T.H. Units on 2.7 ac. of a 1 14.59 ac. site (RP) Location: No. Side of Airport Rd. (Rt. 645), approx. 289' east of Front Royal Pike (Rt.522) Submitted: 08/23/96 Approved: Pending Stephenson Emmanual U.M. Church (SP #038-96) Stonewall 1,500 sf addition on 3.3515 ac. tract (RA) Location: 2720 Martinsburg Pike Submitted: 08/21/96 Approved: Pending Frederick Veterinary Hospital (SP #037-96) Opequon Veterinary Hospital on .50 ac. 1 of a 2.05 ac. site (RP) Location: East side of A for Rd (Rt. 642); so. of Westmoreland Dr Submitted: 08/21/96 Approved: Pending Winchester Regional Airport (SP #036-96) Shawnee T -Hangers & Taxiways on 3 ac. of a 472 ac. site (AP1) Location: Winchester Regional Airport; 491 Airport Road Submitted: 08/20/96 Approved: Pending Kenneth D. Kovach & Theresa Kovach awnee 1,040 sf addit. on 0.26 ac. of a 0.8486 ac. tract (Ml) Location: [2310Arbor Court Submitted: /14/96 A roved: ndin Hardees Mobile Oil Conven. Cntr (SP #050-95) Back Creek Conven. Cntr/Rest. on a 1.0727 ac. site (RA) (CUP #011-95) Location: Southeast corner of Rt. 50 W and Ward Avenue Submitted: 12/20/95 Approved: Pending completion of agency requirements. Kohis Distribution Facility (SP #034-96) awnee Warehouse Distrib; 38 disturbed ac. of 53.27 ac. site (M1) FAirport Location: Rd (Rt. 645) in the Airport Business Center Submitted: 08/02/96 -Approved: Pendin Furlongs Sheet Metal (SP #032-96) (132) Stonewall 5,040 sf bldg on 0.569 ac. of 0.583 ac. site for refrig. repair Location: Southeastern side of Baker Lane Submitted: 07/17/96 Approved: Pending Stimpson/Rt. 277 Oil & Lube Service (SP #030-96) Opequon OR & Lube Serv., Car Wash, Drive-Thru on 2.97 ac. (B2) Location: 152 Fairfax Pk. (behind Red Apple Country Store) Submitted: 07/03/96 Approved: Pending Stonewall Mini -Storage (SP #028-96) Gainesboro Mini -storage on .25 ac. of a 2.56 1 ac. tract (Ml) Location: 120 Lenoir Drive Submitted: 06/20196 Approved: Pending The Corners Restaurant (SP #027-96) Back Creek Addition to a restaurant on 0.10 acres of a 1.245 ac. site (RA) Location: 1429 South Pifer Road Submitted: 06/10/96 Approved: Pending Flying J Travel Plaza (SP #026-96) Stonewall Travel Plaza on 15 acres (B3) Location: S.W. corner of the intersection of I-81 & Rt. 669 Submitted: 05/23/96 Approved: Pendin Cedar Creek Center (SP #025-96) Back Creek Museum on 0.485 ac. of a 3.210 acre parcel (B1) Location: 8437 Valley Pike (Rt. 11), Middletown Submitted: 05/16/96 Approved: Pending AMOCO/House of Gifts (SP #022-96) Gainesboro Gas Pump Canopy 880 sq. ft. area of a 0.916 acre parcel (RA) 1 Location: 3548 North Frederick Pike Submitted: 05/08/96 Approved- Pendin Dr. Raymond Fish (SP #023-96) Stonewall Mini -Golf Facility on 5,000 sq. ft. of a 16 acre parcel (112) Location: S.E. Corner of 1-81/Hopewell Rd. Intersection Submitted: 05/09/96 Approved: Pending Parkview Apts. (formerly Shawnee 76 -unit apartment development Valley Mill Apts.) (SP #020-96) on 7.684 acres (RP) Location: Corner of Rt. 658 & Rt. 659 Submitted: 04/12196 Approved: Pending Stonewall Elem. School (SP #019-96) Stonewall School Bldg; developing 8.22 ac. 1 of a 10.01221S... arcel (RA) Location: 3165 Martinsburg Pike, Clearbrook Submitted: 04/11/96 A roved: Pending American Legion Post #021 (SP #018-96) Stonewall Addition to lodge building on 3.4255 acre site (B2) Location: 1730 Berryville Pike Submitted: 04/10/96 Approved: Pending Dominion Knolls (SP #010- 96) Stonewall 180 TH on 20.278 ac. (RP) Location: Intersection of Baker Lane and Gordon Street Submitted: 02/21/96 Approved: Pending Pegasus Business Center, Phase I (SP #007-96) Shawnee Office, Misc. Retail, Business on 2.5 ac of a 6.0623 ac site (B2) Location: 434 Bufflick Road Submitted: 02/14/96 Approved: Pending 10 D.K. Erectors &Main- tenance, Inc. (SP #051-95) esboro Ja ndust ServJSteel Fabrication on 10 acre site (M2) F453iO Location: Northwestern Pike Submitted: 12/28/95 Approved: IL Pending Wheatlands Wastewater Facility(SP #047-89) Opequon Treatment Facility on 5 Acres ( Location: So. West of Double Tollgate; ad' . & west of Rt. 522 Submitted: 09/12/89 Note: Being held at applicant's request. Flex Tech (SP #057-90) Stonewall I Ml Use on 11 Ac. (Ml) Location: East side of Ft. Collier Rd. 110/25/90 Submitted: Note: LBeingheld atapplicant's request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS: Peggy Ruble (CUP #012-96) Gainesboro I Shale Mining (RA) Location: 532 North Hayfield Road Submitted: 09/06/96 PC Review: 10/02/96 - recommended approval BOS Review: 10/23/96 - tentatively scheduled Painter -Lewis, P.L.C. (CUP #013-96) Gainesboro 1 Country Market/Drive-Thru 1 Food Service (RA) Location: Submitted: 05/10/96 4780 Northwestern Pike Submitted: 09/16/96 PC Review: 11/06/96 BOS Review: 11/27/96 Robert C. Fowler (CUP #007-96) Gainesboro Comm. Outdoor Rec. Facility/ Shooting Range (RA) Location: 840 North Timber Ridge Road Submitted: 05/10/96 PC Review: 06/05/96 - tabled; 09/04/96 - recommended approval BOS Review: 110/09/96 VARIANCES: 12 13 P/C REVIEW: 10-16-96 BOS REVIEW: 11-13-96 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #008-96 CARRIEBROOKE LOCATION: East side of Macedonia Church Road (Rt. 642). South of the intersection of I- 81/37 at Kernstown and north of Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority headquarters. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 75-A-89 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Areas); present use: vacant Zoned B2 (Business General) and RA (Rural ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: B2 (Business General); RA (Rural Areas); Present use: residential, commercial and vacant PROPOSED USE: Commercial/Offices REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter from Bob Childress dated September 19, 1996. Sanitation Authority: First Review - correct and resubmit; two items. Inspections Dept.: No comment required at this time; shall comment on individual site plans when submitted. Fire Marshal: Will address emergency vehicle access on site plan or construction drawings. County Engineer: (1) Identify and delineate wetlands along Opequon and tributaries to Opequon. (2) The indicated SWWP should be sufficient for area west of B2 zoning Carriebrooke MDP #008-96 Pg. 2 October 3, 1996 boundary. Additional SWWP will be required for remaining areas east of B2/A2 boundary. (3) Refer to attached plan for additional comments. Planning and Zoning: VireffmW99MIMA The Board of Supervisors approved a portion of rezoning application # 003-88 on June 6, 1988. The rezoning application called for the rezoning of 14 acres from A-2 (Agricultural General) to B2 (Business General), and of the remaining 77 acres from A-2 (Agricultural General) to RP (Residential Performance). The Board of Supervisors approved only the 14 -acre B2 portion of the rezoning request. Subsequently, rezoning application # 017-88 was submitted by Shiho Inc. This rezoning called for the rezoning of an additional 6 acres of A-2 (Agriculture General) zoned land to B2 (Business General). This is in the form of a 200' strip along the back of the recently approved B2 portion of the property. The Board of Supervisors approved this rezoning application on October 12, 1988. The A-2 (Agricultural General) zoning classification was changed to RA (Rural Areas) in May 1989. Project Scone The Carriebrooke Master Development Plan calls for the development of 20 acres of B2 (Business General) zoned land within three phases. The proposed use for the development is commercial/ofces. An 80' right-of-way is proposed to provide access to the three phases of the development. RA (Rural Areas) zoned land is not subject to Master Development Planning. Therefore, the remaining 77 acres is shown as being left undeveloped. Staff believes that as this is part of the same parcel and under common ownership consideration should be given to the characteristics of this land and any impacts the proposed development would have on it. Possible extension of the road is proposed through the RA portion of the property. This extension is consistent with the provision for construction of a Minor Collector road in this vicinity as shown on the Eastern Road Plan map in the Comprehensive Plan. Carriebrooke MDP #008-96 Pg. 3 October 3, 1996 Staff believes the following issues should be considered by the Planning Commission. 1. Zoning District Buffer The adjoining Stossel property, P.I.N. 75 -A -87A, is zoned RA and is primarily used for residential purposes. Whenever land is to be developed in the B2 zoning district that is adjacent to land such as this, a B Category buffer shall be provided on the land to be developed. This is not shown on the plan. Staff would recommend maintaining a woodland strip of 50' as a full screen as allowed in section 165-37B(2) of the Zoning Ordinance. 2. Environmental Features Areas of Steep Slopes are identified on the plan. Twenty-five percent of these steep slopes are proposed to be disturbed. However, this disturbed area is not shown on the plan. This needs to be clearly delineated on the plan. Staff believes that more than 25 percent of the steep slopes may be disturbed during the development of Phases I, II, and in the construction of the road. Ten acres of woodlands are listed on the Environmental Features chart. Approximately 14 acres are shown on the plan. This discrepancy needs to be addressed. Much of the area shown as woodlands on the plan does not meet the definition of woodlands as defined in the Zoning Ordinance. Therefore, staff believes that the total area of woodlands and the percentage of disturbed woodlands is actually less than indicated on the plan. An area of the site has already been disturbed. Any additional disturbance may result in disturbance of more than the allowed 25 percent. Consideration should be given to the additional disturbance of woodlands that is inevitable during the development of Phases I, 11, and III. The Opeqoun Creek. its tributaries and associated wetlands, and the existing pond need to be identified and addressed on the Master Development Plan. This issue was also raised by the Director of Public Works. 3. Historical Features Historical sites that exist on the RA portion of the property need to be identified on the plan. The Rural Landmarks Survey Report for Frederick County has identified The Carvsbrook House and Carysbrook Redoubt as existing on the property. Special consideration should be Carriebrooke MDP #008-96 Pg. 4 October 3, 1996 given to these sites when finalizing the location of the proposed road through this portion of the site. 4. Transportation The proposed road that provides access to parcels within the B2 portion of the property is sufficient. However, the temporary cul-de-sac should be located on the B2 portion of the property. Possible extension of the road is proposed through the RA portion of the property. This extension is consistent with the provision for construction of a Minor Collector road in this vicinity as shown on the Eastern Road Plan map in the Comprehensive Plan. Detailed plans for this extension and its impact on the existing features should be included as a part of any future development plans for the portion of the property currently zoned RA. Located in the portion of Phase I, south of the access road, is an area reserved for future right-of-way. This is desirable to accommodate any future realignment of Route 642 that may occur. A note identifying this reserved right-of-way should be added to the plan. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 10-16-96 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff recommends approval of the proposed Master Development Plan. The overall concept of this Master DevelopmentPlan is consistentwith the Comprehensive Plan and the requirementsof Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. Staff asks the Planning Commission to ensure that all review agency comments are adequately addressed prior to final approval of this plan. COMMONWEALTH of VIRQINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 September 19, 1996 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN, P.E. RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984-5600 FAX (540) 984-5607 We have no overall objections to this property's Preliminary Master Development Plan. Due to the varied topography of the property, development of and roadway construction could be difficult The plan, although vague, appears to indicate an alignment change in existing Route 642 to provide a thru roadway to the northeast corner of the property. Our comments should in no way be misconstrued to indicate our support of or approval of this alignment change. If it is the developer's and/or County's desire to relocate existing Route 642 thru this property, reference should be made to the current Winchester/Frederick County Area Transportation Study to ensure compatibility with the design. Regardless, the development of this property with commercial/ business uses could have a significant impact on the Route 642 corridor as well as the adjacent Route 37/I-81 interchange area. Based on ultimate build out vossible. Route 64? alignment change (previously mentioned), and extension of the property's access roadway into adjacent properties the proposed 80' right-of-way may be inadequate. Prior to making any final comments we will require a complete set of construction site plans/profiles, drainage calculations and a traffic impact analysis for review. PA. for W. H Bushman Trans. Permits & Subdivision Spec. Supervisor RBC/rf Enclosure xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff (w/ copy of MDP) WE .KEEP VIRGINS A '.Inwir!c, Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. Z 3. 4. Project Title: Carriebrooke Owner's Name: David Holliday Ronald Shickle (Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest) Applicant: Gilbert W. Clifford & Assoc. Inc c/o Steve G-vurisin Address: 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Design Company: Gilbert W. Clifford & Assoc. Inc. `_' -• C5 _ '�'-1 Address: 200 N. Cameron Street ko 77. / Winchester, VA 22601 ��f,� Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Contact Name: Steve Gyurisin Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package APPLICATION contd. MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5. Location of Property: East side of Route 642, south of the intersection of 1-81/37 at Kernstown and north of Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority headquarters. 6. Total Acreage: 20 Acres 7. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number (PIN): b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: 75-A-89 B-2 Vacant Commercial/Offices e) Adjoining Property Information: Attached Property Identification Numbers Property Uses North South East West f) Magisterial District: Shawnee 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original X Amended I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include al contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master developmen Signature: Date: `.0 gilbert w. cli f ford & associates, inc. 200 North Cameron Street * Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2I39 9 Fax: 540-665-0493 C:arriebroolce Master Development Plan Adjoining Property Owners Tax Map Ref. # Prope_M Owner and Address Zoning 71-1-A1 Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority B-2 71-1-A P.O. Box 1877 Winchester, VA 22604 75-A-90 Eleanor Jackson Burleson RA 4800 Fillmore Avenue Alexandria, VA 22311 75-A-96 Eleanor Jackson Burleson RA 4800 Fillmore Avenue Alexandria, VA 22311 75-A-89 Shiho, Inc. B-2/RA P.O. Box 3276 Winchester, VA 22604 75-A-88 Carroll A. Hummer RA c/o Turner Luttrell P.O. Box 521 Stephens City, VA 22655 75-A-84 Marvil Lee Dailey RA 244 Pickett Lane Stephens City, VA 22655 75 -A -87A Joseph H. & Judith A. Stossel RA 176 Pickett Lane Stephens City, VA 22655 75H -3 -OS Shiho, Inc. (Open Space) P.O. Box 3276 Winchester, VA 22604 P/C REVIEW: October 16, 1996 BOS REVIEW: November 13, 1996 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #009-96 Frederick Co./I-81 Industrial Park LOCATION: East side of Route 11 South, %2 mile north of Route 37 and Route 11 intersectionand behind existing Potomac Edison office MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 63-A-86 PROPERTY ZONING. & PRESENT USE: Zoned M2 (Industrial General); Present use: vacant/residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: M2 (Industrial General); B3 (Industrial Transition); M1 (Industrial Light). Present uses: Commercial; industrial; and vacant PROPOSED USE: Industrial REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept of Transportation: See attached VDOT comments dated 8/12/96. Sanitation Authority: This area is served by the City of Winchester. Inspections Dept.: No comment required at this time; shall review when individual site plans are submitted. Fire Marshal: Posted fire lanes will be required at all hydrant and siamese locations. See also attached letter from Doug Kiracofe dated 8/14/96. ounty Engineer: The proposed master development plan is approved as submitted. If desired, this office can provide a preliminary geological description for this property. City of Winchester: Utility layout acceptable; City has water and sewer available on site Frederick County/1-81 Industrial Park Page 2 Planning and Zoning: The land parcel that comprises the proposed Frederick County/Interstate 81 Industrial Park Preliminary Master Development Plan is zoned M2, Industrial General District. Project History This site continues to be in its original land use form containing pastures and two residential farm complexes. The site was previously considered for a Frito Lay facility. Extensive geological studies have been conducted for the site. A planned industrial park is located on adjacent property to the north of this site. Project Scope The Preliminary Master Development Plan calls for the development of this 85.18 acre site into a planned industrial park. Development would occur in two phases. Issues The Zoning Ordinance requires that a buffer be established between properties zoned M-2 and other zoning districts. The establishment of a category "B" zoning district buffer will be required along the parcels' southern and eastern boundaries, adjacent to properties zoned B-3 and M-1, respectively. Access to the proposed development will be via an entrance on U.S. Route 11, and the creation of a new road which would transverse the property in a west -northeast manner providing for internal circulation. The proposed development's entrance would be located similarly to the property's existing residence's entrance. The proposed road will transverse the parcel and terminate at the parcel's northern boundary, at property presently owned by Henkel -Harris Company (PIN 63-A-110). This Henkel -Harris parcel currently has an approved master development plan with provisions for an interparcel connector. It is the intent of this Preliminary Master Development Plan to develop a road that will connect to the Henkel -Harris site in the future. The County encourages the realization of this interconnector road system. There are two existing building complexes located on this parcel. The southern -most complex is currently for residential use. The northwestern complex, identified as the Mervel Adams House (934-980) in the Rural Landmark Survey, has been determined to be a potentially significant property. Properties given this determination were ranked 4 on a scale up to 5; live indicating significant historical properties. The protection and preservation of such sites is encouraged. Frederick County/1-81 Industrial Park Page 3 There are no significant environmental features on the property, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance. Deeds of Dedication Section 165-38 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires that private restrictions be established to promote orderly economic development and to protect property values. Staff feels that it is important to understand this requirement at this phase in the planning process. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 10-16-96 P ANN> N COMMISSION MEETING: Approval, provided that the applicant adequately address all review agency comments, all issues identified in this staff report, all concerns of the Planning Commission, and all concerns of the Board of Supervisors. COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY DAVID R. GEHR 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE COMMISSIONER P.O. BOX 278 EDINBURG. VA 22824-0278 August 12, 1996 WILLIAM H. BUSHMAN, P.E. RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984.5800 FAX (540) 984-5807 Comments to Adams Industrial Park Master Development Plan No objections to the property's preliminary master development plan. When developed the traffic from this project could have a significant impact on the Route 11 corridor. Right-of-way improvements including widenings, turn lanes and traffic signalization at the Route 11 entrance may be necessary based on project traffic counts. With the proximity of Shawnee Drive (Route 652) to the north of this property and possible future right-of-way extension as indicated on the plan, a significant traffic increase on this roadway could occur. With this in mind the roadway design, i.e. width and pavement structure, should be such to accommodate this additional future traffic increase. Prior to making any final comments, this Department will require a complete set of site plans which include roadway geometrics, drainage calculations and trip generation data which includes possible traffic impacts from the Route 652 area for review. If the owner or County is aware of any potential industries which could qualify for industrial access funding of the proposed roadway, we would appreciate being advised as soon as possible. Prior to any work being performed on the State's right-of-way the developer will be required to obtain a land use permit from this Department. Signed: (;I 4ufor W. H. Bushman Trans. Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor RBC/rf xc: Mr. S. A. Melnikoff WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING COUNTY OF FREDERICK, VIRGINIA FIRE AND RESCUE DEPAR'T'MENT 107 North Kent Stree. Winchester, VA 22601 Thomas W. Owens Director August 14, 1996 Mr. Steve Gyurisin c% G. W. Clifford and Associates 200 N. Cameron St. Winchester, Virginia 22601 Dear Steve, Attached are the comments on the Adams Industrial Park, Master Development Plan. Most Fire and Rescue issues will be addressed on the individual site plans as they are received at a later date. Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal As we discussed on the phone today, I would encourage you to explore the possibilities of connecting the water main from Rt. I 1 to another main in the area of the old Capitol Records site, or the Hinkle Harris property. The formation of such a Ioop would certainly enhance water availability to any site in this project, not only for fire protection, but for prospective development. As this area is developed, please ensure temporary street signage, with temporary street addresses at any site being constructed. this will assist our Fire And Rescue personnel, should their services be needed during construction. Please let me know if I can assist further in this matter. Si 1y, Douglas A. Kiracofe Fire Marshal cc: Evan Wyatt file Director (540) 665-5615 Fire Marshal 540 665-6550 • ( ) Fax (540) 67S-4739 Location Map for Frederick Co. / I81 Industrial PIN: 63—A-86 Park Frederick Countv, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package APPLICATION MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1. 2 3. Project Title: _ Frederick County/I-81 Industrial Park Owner's Name: Mervel W. Adams c/o Ann A. Duffey (Please list the names of all owners or parties in interest) Applicant: Gilbert W. Clifford & Assoc. Inc c/o Steve Gvurisin Address: 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 4. Design Company: Gilbert W. Clifford & Assoc., Inc. Address: 200 N. Cameron Street Winchester, VA 22601 Phone Number: (540) 667-2139 Contact Name: Steve Gyurisin �� nti L.c n Frederick County, Virginia Master Development Plan Application Package APPLICATION cont'd. MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN 5. Location of Property: East side of Route 11 south, 1/2 mile north of Route 37 and Route 11 intersection and behind existing Potomac Edinso office. 6. Total Acreage: 85.18 Acres 7. Property Information: a) Property Identification Number (PIN): 63-A-86 b) Current Zoning: M-2 c) Present Use: Vacant/Residential d) Proposed Uses: Industrial e) Adjoining Property Information: attached Property Identification Numbers Property Uses North 63 -A -87A, 87,110,116 Comm. /Ind. /Vacant South 63-A-82, 85, 91A Commercial/Vacant East - - I-81 West 63-A-81, 80 Commercial/Ind. f) Magisterial District: Back Creek 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original X Amended I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include al contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master developmen Signature: Date: gilbert w. clif ford & associates, inc. 200 North Cameron Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601 540-667-2139 • Fax: 540-665-0493 Frederick County/I-81 Industrial park Adjoining Property Owners Tax Map Ref. # Pry erty Owner and Address 63-A-86 Mervel W. Adams c/o Ann A. Duffey 5223 N. 12th Street, Arlington, VA 22205 63-A-82 Carl E. Frye & Ann Lee Frye P.O. Box 2467 Winchester, VA 22604 63-A-85 J.S. Colley c/o Marshall National Bank P.O. Box 38 Marshall, VA 22115 75 -A -91A J.S. Cooley c/o Marshall National Bank P.O. Box 38 Marshall, VA 22115 63-A-110 The Henkel Harris Co., Inc. P.O. Box 2170 Winchester, VA 22604 63-A-87 Flex-O-Glas, Inc. 1100 North Cirero Chicago, IL 60651 63 -A -87A B. J. Sager, Inc. P.O. Box 2746 Winchester, VA 22604 Zoning Use M-2 Residential B-3 Commercial B-3 Commercial B-3 Vacant M-2 Industrial M-2 Commercial - Industrial M-2 Commercial - Industrial Frederick Com.,y/I-81 Industrial Park Adjoining Property Owners Page 2 Tax Map Ref. # Property Owner and Address Zonis Use 63-A-80 Potomac Edison Company M-2 Commercial - 10435 Downsville Pike Industrial Hagerstown, MD 21740 63-A-81 Potomac Edison Company M-2 Commercial - 10435 Downsville Pike Industrial Hagerstown, MD 21740 63-A-68 Schenck Foods Company, Inc. M-1 Commercial- P.O. Box 2298 Industrial Winchester, VA 22604 63-A-69 Walter E. Hillyard RP Residential 646 U.S. Highway 231 Arab, AL 35016 63-A-70 William H. & Barbara W. Black, Jr. RP Residential 121 Rockwall Trail Winchester, Va 22602 63-A-71 Edgar C. & Lucy M. Baker RP Residential 3514 Valley Pike Winchester, VA 22602 63-A-72 Kenneth W. Turner RP Residential 3510 Valley Pike Winchester, VA 22601 63-A-73 Mararet D. Bloxon RP Residential 113 King Lane Winchester, VA 22602 63-1-A/B Schenck Foods Company, Inc. M-1 Commercial- P.O. Box 2298 Industrial Winchester, VA 22604 Tax Mag Ref. # Proms tY Q-.vner and Address 63-(2)-A Not Listed 63-(2)-B Hamman Investment Co., Inc. 1450 Powers Way Venice, FL 34292 63-A-116 John C. & Frances L. Russell 285 Caldwell Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Frederick Coutuy/I-81 Industrial Park Adjoining Property Owners Page 3 L;oning Use M-1 Commercial M-1 Residential COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner H f„ . RE: 1997-1998 Secondary Road Improvement Plan Public Hearing DATE: September 27, 1996 As you know, the Frederick County Secondary Road Improvement Plan is updated on an annual basis. This process provides an opportunity for citizens to participate in three public meetings held throughout the Fall. Ultimately, the Board of Supervisors adopts a final plan which is forwarded to the VDOT District Office in Staunton for funding allocations. The Frederick County Transportation Committee held a public hearing on September 10, 1996 to entertain public requests for road improvements throughout Frederick County and within the towns of Stephens City and Middletown. Three citizens addressed the Transportation Committee regarding hard surface and incidental construction projects. Mr. John Toney requested that VDOT obtain the necessary right-of-way along Carters Lane (Route 629) for hard surface improvements to ensure that the project is not removed from the plan again. Mr. Toney also requested that the Transportation Committeegive this project a higher ranking (it is currently #24) since it was on the plan previously. Mr. Hans Niemann addressed the Transportation Committee regarding the hard surfacing of Chapel ITill Road (Route 692). Mr. Niemann was concerned that the project may be in jeopardy due to right- of-way acquisition problems approximately 1.2 miles north of Brush Creek Road (Route 600). Currently, this project is ranked #4 on the plan. Mr. Mark Garber addressed the Transportation Committee to request that Laurel Grove Road (Route 629) be added to the incidental construction category of the road plan. Mr. Garber expressed concern regarding sight distance problems associated with several "S -turns" along this route. Mr. Garber also expressed concern regarding drainage problems and road wash-out. Staff had received similar citizen requests regarding this situation as well. Mr. Bill Bushman, VDOT Resident Engineer, advised the Transportation Committee that the improvements to the Greenwood Road (Route 656) - Valley Mill Road (Route 659) area would be delayed due to unforeseen problems associated with surveying and engineering. Mr. Bushman suggested that this major road improvement project (ranked #1) be switched with the Middle Road 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Vir,,inia 22601-5011) Page -2- 1997-1998 Plan Memo September 27, 1996 (Route 628) project (ranked #2) to prevent it from being delayed as well. Mr. Jerry Copp, VDOT Assistant Resident Engineer advised the Transportation Committee that right-of-way acquisition was a problem along the second segment of Middle Fork Road (Route 695) and the end of Brush Creek Road (Route 692). Mr. Copp stated that the department has tried to obtain this right-of-way for three years, and although the residents have been pleasant to deal with, he did not believe that acquisition would occur. Mr. Copp advised the Transportation Committee that the first 1.2 mile segment of Brush Creek Road (Route 692) would qualify as a potential project if they felt that is should be scaled down. The Transportation Committee recommended that the 1997-1998 Frederick County Secondary Road Plan be forwarded to the Planning Commission with the following recommendations: The Major Road Improvement Projects category be approved with a change in ranking between the Greenwood Road - Valley Mill Road project and the Middle Road project. No new projects were recommended to be included during this update. The Hard Surface Improvement Projects category be approved with the elimination of the second segment of Middle Fork Road project and the reclassification of the Brush Creek Road project to hard surface a 1.2 mile segment in lieu of a 2.6 mile segment. No new projects were recommended to be included during this update. The Incidental Construction Projects category be approved with the addition of the Laurel Grove Road project, as well as several other projects proposed by VDOT. These projects will commence during the 1998-1999 fiscal year. Included with this memorandum is the proposed draft of the 1997-1998 Frederick County Secondary Road Improvement Plan, a description of new projects that have been included in this year's update, and a list of projects from last year's plan that have received funding. Staff asks that the Planning Commission consider this information and provide a recommendation for this plan that will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors in November for final resolution. MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS Major road improvement projects command .the reconstruction of hardsurfaced roads to enhance public safety. Improvements required for road width, road alignment, road strength, and road gradient are considered major road improvement projects. 1997 - 1998 MAJOR PROJECT ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN RANK ROUTE T FROM TO I 1 ADT 11. -DIST 1 MAGIS AD DAT A - "/ 2 X. 1,63 3, X -7� r./Zae!�/ t��4"5/1 9 R 9 ' Zm 3 621 Rt. 622 Rt. 1109 1080 1.38 miles BC 07/00 4 647 widen between Rts. 277 & 642 7241 2.08 miles OP 07/02 5 608 Rt, 50W Rt. 616 1527 2.83 miles BC UN/SH 6 659 widen from bridge to Rt. 7E 401 0.2 miles ST UN/SH 7 656 widen between Rts. 655 & 657 3041 1.39 miles I SH/ST UN/SH 8 Towns curb and gutter improvements for the Town of Stephens City UN/SH 9 Towns curb and ptter improvements for the Town of Middletown UN/SH 10 664 Rt. 761 Rt. 660 1898 1.1 miles ST UN/SH 11 660 Rt. 664 Rt. 7E 1268 2.13 miles ST UN/SH 12 622 City of Winchester to Rt. 37 9192 1.03 miles BC UN/SH 13 600 1.07 miles N Rt. 600 to Rt. 684 942 1.93 miles GA UN/SH 14 659 Rt. 656 7 bridge 401 1.8 miles ST UN/SH 15 657 City of Winchester to Rt. 656 9197 1.6 miles SH UN/SH 16 739 Rt. 673 Rt. 522N 2763 1.66 miles GA UN/SH 17 636 Rt, 277 Rt. 642 874 1.6 miles OP/SH UN/SH 18 644 City of Winchester to Rt. 5225 4835 1.36 miles SH UN/SH 19 661 Rt. I IN Rt. 660 3973 24 miles ST UN/SH 20 622 Rt. 629 Rt. 37 321+15.86 miles BC UN/SH 1997 - 1998 Road Improvement Plan Page -2- 1997 - 1998 MAJOR PROJECT ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Continued) RANK ROUTE FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD.DAT 21 657 Rt. 656 to Clarke County 4779 2.07 miles ST L UN/SH 22 641 Rt. 647 Rt. 277 2980 0.68 miles OP UN/SH 23 761 Rt. 11N Rt 664 2239 1.13 miles ST UN/SH 24 659 Rt. 716 Rt. 656 4531 1.09 miles SH/ST UN/SH 25 636 Rt. 277 to 1.5 miles south (277) 522 1.5 miles OP UN/SH 26 621 Rt. 1109 Rt. 628 1080 0.57 miles BC UN/SH 27 600 Rt. 753 Rt. 614 1166 1.8 miles BC UN/SH 28 655 Rt, 50E Rt. 656 3176 0.79 miles SH UN/SH 29 642 0.2 miles west Rt. 1070 to Rt. 1031 8046 0.9 miles OP/SH UN/SH 30 661 Rt. 663 1 Rt. 11N 7229 1.21 miles ST/GA UN/SH 31 628 Rt. 621 to City of Winchester 2722 1.25 miles BC UN/SH 32 1 627 Interstate 81 to Route 11 S 1202 0.49 miles OP UN/SH 33 704 Rt. 632 Rt. 683 282 4.11 miles BC UN/SH ADT - Average Daily Secondary Traffic Tabulation Counts. (1995 Tabulations) DIST - Distance of total improvement length in miles. MAGIS - Magisterial District in which road improvement will occur. AD.DAT - Scheduled Advertisement Date for road improvement project to begin. 656* - Improvements to Route 656 will include the intersection of Route 656 and Route 659, as well as the "S" curve leg of Route 656. 621** - Improvements to Route 621 will include drainage improvements south of Route 622 and the realignment of the "S" turn on Route 621. 1997 - 1998 Road Improvement Plan HARDSURFACE ROAD IlVIPROVEMENT PROJECTS Page-3- Hardsurface road improvement projects provide impervious resurfacing and reconstruction of non- hardsurfaced secondary roads. Hardsurface improvements are considered primarily by the average daily traffic count for these secondary roads. 1997 - 1998 NEW HARDSURFACE ROAD LWPROVEMENT PLAN RANK ROUTE FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD.DAT 1 701 Rt. 703 to West Virginia line 124 1.01 miles GA 07/97 2 695 1.09 to 2.3 miles north Rt. 522 83 1.21 miles GA 07/99 3 695 2.3 miles north Rt. 522 to W VA 83 0.9 miles GA 07/01 4 692 Rt. 600 Rt. 671 137 2.6 miles GA 07/03 5 625 Rt. 624 Rt. 635 150 0.5 miles BC UN/SH 6 633 Rt. 625 Rt. IIS 91 1.4 miles OP/BC UN/SH 7 696 Rt. 522N Rt. 694 81 1.3 miles GA UN/SH 8 638 Rt. 625 Rt. 759 86 0.8 miles BC UN/SH 9 629 Rt.608 to 1.15 miles east Rt. 622 98 3.05 miles BC UN/SH 10 636 Rt. 709 1 Rt. 735 147 1.1 miles OP UN/SH 11 811 Rt.671 to 0.45 miles north (67 1) 137 0.25 miles OP UN/SH 12 679 0.3 miles west Rt. 608 to 0.5 miles east Rt. 600 94 2.5 miles GA UN/SH 11 1997 - 1998 Road Improvement Plan Page A- 1997 - 1998 NEW HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN (Continued) RANK ROUTE FROM TO ADT DIST MAGIS AD.DAT 13 734 addition of 1 mile 99 1 mile GA UN/SH 14 704 Rt. 683 to West Vir ' 'a line 174 3.3 miles BC UN/SH 15 676 0.83 mile south RL671 to Rt.677 168 0.87 miles GA U%USH 16 644 Rt. 50E to Clarke County line 69 0.81 miles SH UN/SH 17 634 Rt. 635 Rt. IIS 180 0.25 males OP UN/SH 18 733 Rt. SOW Rt. 707 61 1.3 miles BC UN/SH 19 836 Rt. 11 N end Rt. 836 75 0.80 miles ST UN/SH 20 709 Rt. 636 Rt. 735 133 2.7 miles OP UN/SH 21 607 Rt. 600 end 113 0.78 miles BC UN/SH 22 671 Rt. 669 West Virginia 168 0.30 miles ST UN/SH 23 636 Rt. 640 Rt. 641 46 1.5 miles OP UN/SH 24 629 Rt.631 Rt. 625 149 1.8 miles BC UN/SH 25 16891 Rt. 600 Rt. 600 63 4.2 miles GA UN/SH 26 612 Rt. 612 Rt. 608 184 3.2 miles LBC UN/SH Allocations have been made for hardsurface improvements to Route 777. Improvements to Route 777 will commence during the third phase of construction of Route 522 South. L• • ADT - Average Daily Secondary Traffic Tabulation Counts. (1993 Tabulations) DIST - Distance of total improvement length in miles. MAGIS - Magisterial District in which hardsurfacing will occur. AD.DAT - Scheduled Advertisement Date for hardsurface road improvement project to begin. 1997 - 1998 Road Improvement Plan INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION Page -5- Incidental construction projects are defined as minor construction. projects that cost less than $100,000. Examples involve drainage improvements, site. distance improvements, spot widening, replacing overflow pipes with box culverts, and the application of cold mix on existing road surfaces. The Virginia Department of Transportation determines if a proposed projects qualifies for Incidental Construction based on the overall scope of the improvement. 1997 - 1998 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION PLAN RANK ROUTE FROM TO DESCRIPTION MAGIS F/Y 1 739 Rt. 522 to 0.10 MN Construct Left Turn Lane ST 97/98 (James Wood H.S.) 2 652 Rt. 11 to 0.10 MN Construct Right Turn Lane (GE BC 97/98 Plant 3 631 Rt. 625 to 0.07 MW Flatten Slope To Improve Sight OP 97/98 Distance 4 654 Rt. 522N to 0.11 MN Rt. 165 lbs. Plant Mix GA 97/98 677 5 783 Rt. 1322 to Winchester City 165 lbs. Plant Mix ST 97/98 Limits 6 861 Rt. F-732 to 0.25 MW 165 lbs Plant Mix ST 97/98 7 608 At 0.80 ME of Rt. 681 Replace Bridge over Back GA 97/98 Creek 8 655 Rt. 50E to Clarke County 200 lbs. Plant Mix SH 97/98 9 689 Rt. 600 to Rt. 600 Spot Widen & 165 lb Plant Mix GA 97/98 1©. ��Ri 622 to Ei1d`Mairrten • �515s Paant 1v1ix ; f ♦`B,,��7/9$' ytr' 704 tpVJVLiriewlden;;r .;x�t ,% �j / LZr •'' i7 !I; f r • . , . Rf '59 tc"Rt 6 j f f f /} '% S of Wtd�n i i BC ',' r / r'. p ``;N ,/ �'` �• �ij fir /rs' r;', , f f r' . F`, . r � i '!' ;, eplace P,pe CaWert Box,/ ,• ' •i/' I/ ST", %: f�38/99•' M 621 0 Rt' -60,"I" {' S` ; ... MAGIS - Magisterial District in which incidental construction will occur. F/Y - Fiscal Year in which incidental construction will occur. MN - Miles North MS - Miles South ME - Miles East MW - Miles West NEW ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS INCORPORATED INTO DRAFT 1997 - 1998 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE No new projects were requested for the 1997 - 1998 update. No new projects were requested for the 1997 - 1998 update. I I • _ M 41 • •gni Project #10: Windsor Lane (Route 1300) from Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) to end of state maintenance. Project #11: Pinetop Road (Route 617) from Back Creek Road (Route 704) to West Virginia state line. Project #12: Hollow Road (Route 707) from Carpers Pike (Route 259) to Muse Road (Route 610). Project #13: Back Ridge Road and Fishel Road (both segments of Route 612) between intersections with Back Mountain Road (Route 600). Project #14: Jordan Springs Road (Route 664); approximately 1/4 mile northwest of intersection with Woods Mill Road (Route 660). Project #15: Laurel Grove Road (Route 629) from Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) to Wardensville Grade (Route 608). NEW ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (Continued) Project #16: Heishman Lane (Route 607) from Back Mountain Road (Route 600) to the end of Fleishman Lane. Project #17: Apply plant mix throughout the Lakeside Subdivision as needed to improve various roads in which pavement failure is a problem. Project #18: Laurel Grove Road (Route 629) from Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) to 1.15 miles east of Cedar Creek Grade. ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER 1995 - 1996 SECONDARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION BUDGET No major road improvement projects were funded from the 1996 - 1997 Road Improvement Plan. Opequon Church Lane (Rt. 706) from Valley Pike (Rt. 11 South) to end. Ridgeview Road (Rt. 702) from Whitacre Road (Rt. 703) to West Virginia state line. NOTE: Right-of-way acquisition not secure for Opequon Church Lane at this time. Fort Collier Road (Rt. 1322) - apply plant mix. Welltown Road (Rt. 661) - apply plant mix. Rest Church Road (Rt. 669) - apply plant mix. Wardensville Grade (Rt. 608) - replace bridge. Hites Road (Rt. 625) - widen roadway. Refuge Church Road (Rt. 640) - widen and raise roadway. Chalybeate Springs Road (Rt. 687) - spot widen. Knob Road (Rt. 752) - spot widen. Shockeysville Road (Rt. 671) - spot widen. Macedonia Church Road (Rt. 642) - construct storm water management facility. — c I 9tEPNENNSC11 AREA REAT N i 4 a -"Wi1w, 2 E T mE v\� CLEEM BROOKNEW THER RAN, AREA I ® em Eur AT iOw.RNNEV E. W v. A EN E0. ro EIAWMO �a7�'Mi; J �J George Washington \ . O A /National Forest B BE BE P � %AT ,. ) s � � F N O A N C O 4 N O U H ro B NMM L RL MNAM NEEA9 W CdNT N OF NE. EI. 1NE Y FREDERICK COUNTY BFCOMWYMP ••--TAYUTAININ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA 1\ O S IYPF }1.4 })d }1�1 TYIE1 123140 .Nidi 1231-A 1 1"-W 1231-M BSTq 11]en F.E. NI., PITA, MVR) 2R IDAa ep,N 1 R� N) p)]I yfJe 34"o391.21 1401 EAST BROAD STREET )NN OMV24401 FFG 21y P6p tyM µL_yIDA}NgIPURFIII PIPP 21dY a -"Wi1w, 2 E T mE v\� CLEEM BROOKNEW THER RAN, AREA I ® em Eur AT iOw.RNNEV E. W v. A EN E0. ro EIAWMO �a7�'Mi; J �J George Washington \ . O A /National Forest B BE BE P � %AT ,. ) s � � F N O A N C O 4 N O U H ro B NMM L RL MNAM NEEA9 W CdNT N OF NE. EI. 1NE Fy 13 FA FREDERICK COUNTY BFCOMWYMP ••--TAYUTAININ COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA IYPF }1.4 })d }1�1 TYIE1 123140 .Nidi 1231-A 1 1"-W 1231-M BSTq 11]en F.E. NI., PITA, MVR) 2R IDAa ep,N NMO&116µ4 Pty p)]I yfJe 34"o391.21 1401 EAST BROAD STREET )NN OMV24401 FFG 21y P6p tyM µL_yIDA}NgIPURFIII PIPP 21dY 10.ID 121.10 119.92 INM fWl dNP®PPIWM® 0.W ]BJP 161y NaMrPURFAL£ N1.8) NID 61A1 52.611 PY.BP aro >N UMIMflNVEP rp.® ]H2OI )ObH UMBUT#L91 Pp,pF 225 0.11 0.00 0.00 m Ps TOTALMM1MOE WA1 yU1 PT131 TO)KMIJAOE N.06 NINE. 517y 6PI.i NEIL. I NEENMJe Fy 13 FA R R E N COUNTY LEGEND A.S. OHNEO. S, LIC. [Ren]O[IN ALL INNITALABLECT ,NWn YHIGHWAY POOrl MOPS p.1 WR -...IRR.. QeRIP.RV PNRW.v ® [S.A.' RAILROADS TARSF SELITHALA T.. OTTERENTS POTERS, SOVPOAP EE LINE .1 LATE ARREAFFIRSAL ONE AT CHRIE .-0 'AN. ANCIEFFIFTEW CAR WER IIY AlA Oft OTT CEH]FREnonouv O O WELv REOR LAOR LL OTHEREST RES. 2A 'ACT o 'A-.'.CSTCT. ow ..Bn.EWBITTLIRE[ AIRPORTS ♦ LNARYCONEA Po+oas R.L. * REn .-I'. A ".PARALLEL TO FEATFIRSEENCH AS FATENE MCI ARB nvoR.TE 4WTE OR CaWTTLw. ETC. ARE OR THE OFFER LINE or ANN]EAerUE [a w PR®BRI COVN)Y DURAL OR IPERaMIM YUIMOMLI]-ANepUtAi ON BO. YIIR RM LEEMR .IS] To1.NE or E. N E0.]xE THERNAL OMCNEBifR iM] ,IB] REQUESTS FOR HAPERCHREARTS,no, ON ROASTS WN ON TIHIS~W YU BE RDOREBREO TO M BTR,m os TRANSPERE Tone<RTMExr R.O. BOX. BTBA NTON, v Row. .1 FREDERICK COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA INDEX TO COUNTY WCATION GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP FREDERICK COUNTY PREPARED BY VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT m 1401 EAST BROAD STREET rm IN COOPEUTIONwrm U.a. "FRAR)MEM OF TMN9PORipipH FEOERAL HIGH W Av AOMI W 6TMlION �m SCALE Nly 0 1 2 S 0 RIMNNILE 0 S 1 0 6 I NICK EpuAA,.ARES, RIION.TE.. OvnpT. IM F . a W EA- O,R,rmwnsi uRyoi,�W i aim � • v ���2 i • © _.© 1j �� mil �t m lu•, DR P.1` IID © 1 © V m®moo AN m IFm 2'1 3 Y• LJ T/ �a m�J R• CJ p __PES }^� A _ - LJJ 07,77711 R R E N COUNTY LEGEND A.S. OHNEO. S, LIC. [Ren]O[IN ALL INNITALABLECT ,NWn YHIGHWAY POOrl MOPS p.1 WR -...IRR.. QeRIP.RV PNRW.v ® [S.A.' RAILROADS TARSF SELITHALA T.. OTTERENTS POTERS, SOVPOAP EE LINE .1 LATE ARREAFFIRSAL ONE AT CHRIE .-0 'AN. ANCIEFFIFTEW CAR WER IIY AlA Oft OTT CEH]FREnonouv O O WELv REOR LAOR LL OTHEREST RES. 2A 'ACT o 'A-.'.CSTCT. ow ..Bn.EWBITTLIRE[ AIRPORTS ♦ LNARYCONEA Po+oas R.L. * REn .-I'. A ".PARALLEL TO FEATFIRSEENCH AS FATENE MCI ARB nvoR.TE 4WTE OR CaWTTLw. ETC. ARE OR THE OFFER LINE or ANN]EAerUE [a w PR®BRI COVN)Y DURAL OR IPERaMIM YUIMOMLI]-ANepUtAi ON BO. YIIR RM LEEMR .IS] To1.NE or E. N E0.]xE THERNAL OMCNEBifR iM] ,IB] REQUESTS FOR HAPERCHREARTS,no, ON ROASTS WN ON TIHIS~W YU BE RDOREBREO TO M BTR,m os TRANSPERE Tone<RTMExr R.O. BOX. BTBA NTON, v Row. .1 PSEDSRmm COUNTRY u FREDERICK COUNTY COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA INDEX TO COUNTY WCATION GENERAL HIGHWAY MAP FREDERICK COUNTY PREPARED BY VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 1401 EAST BROAD STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 29219 IN COOPEUTIONwrm U.a. "FRAR)MEM OF TMN9PORipipH FEOERAL HIGH W Av AOMI W 6TMlION ROADS CORRECT TO JANUARY 1, 1989 SCALE Nly 0 1 2 S 0 RIMNNILE 0 S 1 0 6 I NICK EpuAA,.ARES, RIION.TE.. OvnpT. IM F . a W EA- O,R,rmwnsi uRyoi,�W PSEDSRmm COUNTRY u COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 MEMORAND M TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Planner II RE: . Planning Commission Tabling Procedures DATE: September 25, 1996 Staff presented proposed tabling procedure amendments to the full Planning Commission for discussion and comment during the August 21, 1996 meeting. The Planning Commission felt that the proposed procedures were appropriate as amended and directed staff to forward the draft amendments for final action. The Planning Commission Bylaws specify that amendments may occur by a majority vote of the entire voting membership after thirty days prior notice. The proposed amendments meet this requirement; therefore, staff asks that the Planning Commission consider this information for final disposition. 107 North Dent Street • Winchester. Virginia 22601-5000 ARTICLE IX - OPERATING RULES Section 9-3-9 Tabling 9-3-9-1 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to table agenda items if any one of the following situations occurs: A) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of it i . B) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of Frederick County. C) Insufficient information has been provided for the agenda item. D) Issues or concerns that arise during formal discussion of the agenda item warrant additional information or study. E) The applicant provides the Frederick County Planning Department with a written request to table the agenda item. F) The Frederick County Planning Department is advised of an emergency situation that prevents attendance by the applicant. G) The applicant fails to appear at the meeting in which the application has been advertised to appear. 9-3-9-2 The applicant shall be permitted to request that an agenda item be tabled from a scheduled Planning Commission meeting one time. The Planning Commission shall table the application for a specific period of time to ensure that the requirements of Section 165-10 of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance are not exceeded unless the applicant requests a waiver from this requirement. 9-3-9-3 An application that has been tabled for an unspecified period of time shall be readvertised for consideration by the Planning Commission once the following steps have been completed: A) The applicant has requested in writing that the agenda item be considered by the Planning Commission. B) The applicant has provided all required information to the Frederick County Planning Department which addresses all concerns of the Planning Commission. 9-3-9-4 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to act on an agenda item that has been tabled one time when the agenda item has been readvertised for a subsequent Planning Commission agenda.