PC 05-07-97 Meeting AgendaAGENDA
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Board Room
Frederick County Administration Building
Winchester, Virginia
MAY 7, 1997
7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) Minutes of March 19, 1997 ........................................... A
2) Bi -Monthly Report .................................................. B
3) Committee Reports .................................................. C
4) Citizen Comments .................................................. D
PUBLIC HEARING
5) Rezoning Application #001-97 of Omps Funeral Home, Inc. to rezone 1.396 acres from
RA (Rural Areas) District to B2 (Business General) District to establish a funeral home
operation. This property is located on the west side of Route 522 South, approximately
1,500' north of the intersection of Route 644 and Route 522 South, and is identified with
Property Identification Number 64-3-A in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
(Mr. Wyatt) ....................................................... E
DISCUSSION ITEMS
6) Discussion regarding the interpretation of the Eastern Road Plan
(Mr. Lawrence) .................................................... F
7) Discussion regarding the proposed Corridor Design Standards
(Mr. Wyatt) ....................................................... G
8) 1996 Annual Report
(Mr. Ruddy) ...................................................... H
9) Other
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on March 19, 1997.
PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; John R Marker, Vice-Chairman/Back
Creek District; Marjorie H. Copenhaver, Back Creek District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Robert A.
Morris, Shawnee District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Richard C.
Ours, Opequon District; and Terry Stone, Gainesboro District George L. Romine, Citizen at Large; W. Wayne
Miller, Gainesboro District; Robert M. Sager, Board Liaison; Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison;
and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel.
STAFF PRESENT: Kris C. Tierney, Planning Director; Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director; and Renee' S.
Arlotta, Minutes Recorder.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
MINUTES - FEBRUARY 5,1997
Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Romine, the Commission unanimously
approved the February 5, 1997 minutes as presented.
BIMONTHLY REPORT
Chairman DeHaven accepted the Bimonthly Report for the Commission's information.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 35
-2 -
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Economic Development Commission
Mr. Romine reported that the EDC has a new person in place to handle existing industrial
development. Mr. Romine said that he is also a member of that committee.
Sanitation Authority - 03/18/97 Mtg.
Mrs. Copenhaver reported that the SA prioritized their Capital Improvements Plans and
authorized Mr. Jones to apply for a VRA loan which would enable them to get several projects underway: the
Berryville Water Transmission Main, the Northwest Water Storage Tank, the Rt. 50Nictory Lane Water Loop,
and the Rt. 522/ 50 Water Transmission Main. She said that this will enable the County to be completely free
of purchasing City water by the Year 2000. She said the County is now purchasing approximately 450,000 gpd
from the City.
Mrs. Copenhaver also reported that all plants are working fine and there are no problems.
Winchester Planning Commission (WPC) - 03/18/97
Mr. DiBenedetto, Winchester Planning Commission Liaison, reported that the WPC
recommended approval of a conditional use permit that will allow Glen Burnie to become a museum; and this
will go to Council next month. Mr. DiBenedetto said that the WPC also initiated a text amendment to allow
police substations in residential areas. He said the Council and the Police want to establish one at the North Kent
Street School and unfortunately, City zoning does not allow it. He said that the WPC also initiated discussion
on changing the higher education districts to something that will be referred to as "Educational -Institutional
Public Use District" which will allow many uses. Mr. DiBenedetto said that work is continuing on the
Comprehensive Plan Update.
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Re: The Home Plate, Inc.; A recreational facility (batting cages), zoned 112, located at the corner of
Warrior Drive and Ivory Drive
A number of residents of this area were present to show their concern about this establishment
and the following two people spoke to the Commission:
Mrs. Carmen Burnette, resident at 110 Peridot Place, Georgetown Court II, in Stephens City,
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 36
-3 -
said that many people in her neighborhood had concerns about the batting cages; specifically, those concerns
involved the traffic, attracting outsiders into their neighborhood, and the light pollution. Mrs. Burnette said that
last summer they experienced some breaking and entering problems in the area. She felt it was going to be
difficult to sell their homes when the time came because of these problems. She said that the light pollution is
generated by the batting cages, the park, and the high school. Mrs. Burnette said that the batting cages are located
right in the middle of her residential neighborhood and she felt it was not the best location.
Mr. Doug Greene, resident of the Village at Sherando, stated that he didn't pay $125,000 for
his home to open the front door and look out to see a construction trailer, which is located at the batting cages.
Mr. Greene said that he was told before he bought the property that a road was supposed to go through there.
He felt it was strange that a piece of property could be rezoned to commercial, when the whole area was
residential.
Chairman DeHaven asked Mr. Greene when he bought his property and Mr. Greene replied that
he purchased it in November of 1995. Chairman DeHaven explained to Mr. Greene that the property was rezoned
for commercial before the surrounding developments existed.
Mr. Tierney said that the property along both sides of Warrior Drive from Rt. 277 North to
where the batting cages are located was all zoned to business back in 1992. He said that one of the important
factors in this particular instance is that this property was zoned for business before the area was ever subdivided
for residential development. He stated that when the lots were sold, the business zoning existed there. Mr.
Tierney said that if the people that bought homes there were not told that, then their dispute should be with their
realtor or their closing attorneys.
Mr. Ours stated that the master development plan for the Village at Sherando initially called for
that front area to be commercial. He said that Dr. McAllister had planned froin the beginning, before there was
ever a footer poured for any house in that development, that a portion of the master plan be designated for
commercial/business.
Mr. Matthew Croke, the owner of The Home Plate, stated that last Sunday, he met with about
24 residents at the site and he expressed to them that he wanted to be a good neighbor and do the right thing. Mr.
Croke said that he was sorry this was happening, however, the County did take a look at what was going there
next to the residential neighborhood. He said that the County required what he thought was more parking than
might be necessary, just to be sure there would be no overspill; and also required what he and his engineer thought
was more landscaping than what was necessary, so the property would look good. Mr. Croke said that his family
has invested everything they have into this business and they want to be as proud of it as the residents are of their
homes.
Chairman DeHaven suggested that the people present go to the Planning Department and take
a look at the site plan for the property and the requirements of the zoning ordinance on buffering/screening and
mitigation of impacts for adjoining properties.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 37
-4 -
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Amendments to Chapter 165, Zoning, Article IV, Supplementary Use Regulations, Section 165-24, Height
Limitations; Exceptions; Section 165-48.6, Commercial Telecommunications Facilities; and Article XXI,
Definitions, of the Frederick County Code. These proposed amendments will establish procedures and
standards to allow for the siting of commercial telecommunication facilities within all zoning districts
specified in this Chapter.
Action - Recommended Approval
Mr. Wyatt presented the proposed amendment to the Commission. He explained that the
amend =t sets forth three definitions, standards for a conditional use permit (CUP) process for the siting of any
facility and requests additional information as a part of the application, and it sets forth performance standards
that would apply to any property in which a facility is sited. Mr. Wyatt next reviewed the amendments with the
Commission.
Members of the Commission asked if it would be appropriate to address the collocation as part
of the CUP process and Mr. Wyatt replied that during the most recent subcommittee meeting, the group felt that
the attempts to collocate should be encouraged, but not required.
Members of the Commission inquired if service providers were attempting to access power of
eminent domain for these structures. Mr. Wyatt replied that he was not aware of that.
Discussion next ensued regarding monopole versus lattice type towers. Commission members
felt that the wording was somewhat vague as to whether or not the intent is to require monopoles everywhere and
allow for an exception for lattice towers outside of the urban development area (UDA) and historic sites. It was
noted that there was a good deal of discussion about this at committee. Some of the Commissioners felt the
wording would be better stated requiring monopole construction, but that the Planning Commission may allow
lattice construction under special conditions.
Mr. Tierney suggested the following wording under 165-48.6; B. 2) "Monopole -type
construction shall be required for new commercial telecommunication towers. The Planning Commission may
allow lattice type construction for sites which are located outside the UDA provided that the sites are not adjacent
to properties which are identified as historic sites." The Planning Commission felt this language was appropriate.
Chairman DeHaven consulted with legal counsel, Jay Cook, to determine if the language change
would require readvertising. Mr. Cook responded that the public hearing could continue with the change in
language.
The Commission next discussed procedures for removal of the facility within one year of the
abandonment. It was noted that at the last meeting, there was discussion about a bond requirement. Mr. Wyatt
said the subcommittee felt that if it was spelled out initially as to how it would be removed, whether it would be
a requirement of the property owner through the lease agreement, or by the company itself through a bond issue,
or however they determine best to do it, that would leave open many avenues to remove the tower, should it
become abandoned. Mr. Miller added that it could be a standard condition of the CUP that tower removal be a
pay 4 of the agreement between Iffie se:vicc provider and the landowner. Mr. Miller said that he would be opposed
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 38
-5 -
to the bonding situation because there would be a significant addition to the cost that may never be required.
Chairman DeHaven called for public comment and the following individual came forward to
speak:
Mr. Michael Collins, an amateur radio operator and member of the Shenandoah Valley Amateur
Radio Club, had concerns that the proposed amendment might affect two-way radio antennas or licensed amateur
radio operators.
Mr. Wyatt explained that structures utilized as satellite earth stations and structures utilized for
amateur or recreational purposes such as ham radio or citizen band radio were specifically excluded from the
requirements. He explained that the County is hoping to guide the placement of structures, not to restrict their
access.
The Planning Commission felt that the amendments presented, with the inclusion of the
modification to Section B(2), addressed all of the concerns raised.
Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Marker,
BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of the amendments to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, Article IV, Supplementary Use
Regulations, Section 165-24, Height Limitations; Exceptions; Section 165-48.6, Commercial
Telecommunications Facilities; and Article XXI, Definitions, with the modification as stated for Section 165-48.6
B(2).
DISCUSSION
Implementation of a "No Through Truck Traffic" Policy for Tasker Drive (Relocated Route 642).
Action - Approval
Mr. Wyatt said that the staff is concerned that when Tasker Drive opens in the Spring, providing
direct access to Eastgate, it may create the potential for tractor -trailer truck traffic to utilize this route to get to
Route 522, towards areas such as the Inland Port. Mr. Wyatt said that residential lot frontage exists along this
road for several subdivisions in the area; and, in addition, a portion of Tasker Drive, being the old Rt. 642, was
constructed to a lesser standard and may not hold up to truck traffic. Mr. Wyatt said that there has been a
significant expenditure by the State to upgrade Rt. 522 South to a four -lane condition to accommodate truck
traffic.
Mr. Wyatt said that at the meeting of March 4, 1997, the Transportation Committee agreed with
the concept of "no through truck traffic;" however, the two concerns were: 1) what types of truck traffic would
be prohibited; and 2) what type of enforcement would be used?
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 39
Commission members felt that the problem was going to be how to distinguish between local,
destination truck traffic and truck traffic en route to the Inland Port. They felt that the residents in the area will
be thinking that the regulation is a ban for all truck traffic.
Mr. Tierney pointed out that the regulation is for "no through truck traffic," therefore, any
legitimate "destination" traffic along Tasker Drive is okay. Mr. Tierney said that we cannot prevent any industry
that might locate along Tasker Drive from getting truck deliveries and that's not what we're trying to do. He said
that ultimately, this will be a deterrent, but it won't solve the problem completely.
Mr. DiBenedetto wanted to explain to the Commission how the enforcement issue would
probably be handled, since he works in law enforcement and knew how the system worked. Mr. DiBenedetto said
that law enforcement departments receive complaints all the time about speeding through school zones or
neighborhoods or the Sheriff will get a letter from a Board member who has received phone calls from people.
He said that the departments will do something called "selective enforcement." He explained that specific times
are targeted and a deputy or two is placed in a specific area and the law is enforced a little bit. Mr. DiBenedetto
said that this has a positive impact. He said that the "no through truck traffic" signs will stop some people, then
the Sheriff will selectively enforce that law at particular times and the word gets out that it may cost money to
go down through there. He said that having the sign and doing some selective enforcement through the Sheriff's
office probably will make a difference. The Sheriff's office will keep a record of the complaints.
The Planning Commissioners felt that the proposed policy would eliminate some through -truck
traffic and for them, that was the intent of the policy and made it worthwhile to pursue it. They realized there
would probably be a misconception among some people that this was going to do more than be a deterrent.
Mr. Sager pointed out that the Route 642/647 intersection was a serious problem. Mr. Sager
said that numerous accidents continue to occur here. He said that no one knows when a traffic light will be
installed here and the residents are very much concerned about the situation. Mr. Sager said that the second
concern was the deterioration of the roadway itself, between 37 and 647; and the third concern expressed to him
was the ability to get out on the Rt. 522 side.
Chairman DeHaven asked if there was any public comment and someone in the audience asked
if the speed limit was going to be 35 mph on Tasker Drive. Commission members replied that it is still 45 mph
and steps would need to be taken to lower the limit. Another member of the public asked if the potential was
there for Eastgate to become a large industrial park. Commission members replied that the potential was there,
but it was hard to generalize at this point in time.
Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Marker,
BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick Planning Commission does hereby unanimously endorse the "No
Through Truck Traffic" Policy for Tasker Drive as presented by the staff and recommends unanimous approval
to the Board of Supervisors.
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 40
-7 -
Joint Stephens Citv/ Frederick County Planning Committee
Mr. Tierney presented a memorandum to the Commission that summarized the initial meeting
that both Mr. Sager and he attended with representatives of Stephens City on the joint planning effort. Mr.
Tierney said that the intention is to meet monthly to study and work out some issues.
Cancellation of the Commission's April 2 1997 Meeting
Mr. Tierney stated that the staff has no agenda items for the Commission's April 2 meeting and
the recommendation is to cancel that meeting. There being no objections, Chairman DeHaven canceled the first
meeting in April.
ADJOURNMENT
i.o uuier business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned by unanimous vote.
Respectfully submitted,
Kris C. Tierney, Secretary
Charles S. DeHaven, Chairman
Frederick County Planning Commission
Minutes of March 19, 1997 Page 41
BIMONTHLY REPORT OF PENDING APPLICATIONS
(printed April 24, 1997)
Application newly submitted.
REZONINGS:
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
Dominion Knolls (NMP #001-97)
Stonewall
1
7
76 SF Detached Zero Lot Line Homes
0
on 20.278 acres (RP)
Location:
SW Comer of Ft. Collier Rd. (Rt. 1322) & Baker Lane (Rt. 1200)
Submitted:
01/27/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - approved
6
Pending completion of review agency comments.
Location:
West side of Rt. 522 So. of Winchester, approx. 1500' no. of the Rt.
6441522 So. intersection.
1 'Submitted:
04/17/97
PC Review:
05/07/97
BOS Review:
I -- 1
05/28/97 - tentatively scheduled
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLANS:
Dominion Knolls (NMP #001-97)
Stonewall
1
7
76 SF Detached Zero Lot Line Homes
0
on 20.278 acres (RP)
Location:
SW Comer of Ft. Collier Rd. (Rt. 1322) & Baker Lane (Rt. 1200)
Submitted:
01/27/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - approved
Admininstrative Approval:
Pending completion of review agency comments.
SUBDIVISIONS:
Valley Mill Estates (SUB)
Stonewall
21 SF Trad. Lots (RP)
Location:
No. Side of Valley Mill Rd. & East of Greenwood Rd.
Submitted:
10/23/95
1
MDP #001-95
Approved 04/26/95
Admin. Approved:
03/26/97
Winc-Fred Co. IDC (SUB)
Back Creek
1 2 M1 Lots (0.552 acres & 20.285acres)
Location:
Southeast side of Development Lane
Submitted:
09/08/95
MDP #003-87
Approved 07/08/87
Pending Admin. Approval
Awaiting signed plats.
RT&T Partnership (SUB)
Back Creek
I 1 Lot - 29.6 Acres (B2)
Location:
Valley Pike (Rt. 11 So.)
Submitted:
05/17/95
MDP #003-91
Approved 07/10/91
Pending Admin. Approval:
Awaiting submission of signed plat & deed of dedication
Briarwood Estates (SUB)
Stonewall
20 SF Det. Trad. Lots (RP)
Location:
Greenwood Rd.
Submitted:
01/03/94
MDP #005-93
Approved 12/8/93
Pending Admin. Approval:
Being held at applicant's request.
Abrams Point, Phase I (SUB)
Shawnee
230 SF Cluster & Urban Lots (RP)
Location:
South side of Rt. 659
Submitted:
05/02/90
PC Review:
06/06/90 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
06/13/90 - a roved
Pending Admin. Approval:
Awaiting deed of ded., letter of credit, and signed plat
Harry Stimpson (SUB)
Opeguou
I Two B2 Lots
Location•
Town Run Lane
Submitted:
09/23/94
PC Review:
10/ 19/94 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
10/26/94 - approved
Pending Admin. Approval:
Awaiting signed plat.
SITE PLANS:
Hogue Creek Country Market
Addition (SP #011-97)
Gainesboro
Country Market; 5,520 s.f. proposed
1 additional floor area (RA)
Location:
4780 Northwestern Pike
Submitted:
03/31/97
Approved:
Pending
Marathon Bank (SP #010-97)
Gainesboro
Bank (2200 sq ft office area); 35,414 sq
ft lot area (B2)
Location:
US Rt. 522 North at Sunnyside
Submitted:
03/25/97
Approved:
Pending
New Image Graphics
(SP #009-97)
Shawnee
Office & Mfg. uses; 1.30 ac. of 2.00 ac.
1 site to be disturbed (MI)
Location:
Victory Lane
Submitted:
03/21/97
Approved:
Pending
American Background at West-
view Bus. Cntr. (SP #008-97)
Shawnee
Offices on 1.4523 acres (MI)
Location:
No. East corner of Victory Ln. (Rt. 728) & Independence Drive
Submitted:
03/14/97
Approved:
Pending
Veteran's Texaco Station &
Conven. Store & Burger King
Restaurant Addit. (SP #007-97)
Opequon
Service Station, Store, & Burger King
Restaurant on 1.0591 acres
Location:
121 Fairfax Pike
Submitted:
03/13/97
Approved:
Pending
Agape Christian Fellowship
Church Sanctuary (SP #005-97)
Shawnee
Church Expansion; 2.5 ac. to be
developed of a 29.5115 ac. site (RA)
Location:
East side of Rt. 642; approx. 2,500' so. of the Rt. 37/I-81 Interch .
Submitted:
02/12/97
Approved:
Pending
Rose Memorial Foundation
(SP #004'97)
Stonewall
11
Renovation of existing residence for an
adult care facility; 3.292 ac. site (RP)
Location:
549 VaHey Mill Road
Submitted:
02/11/97
Approved:
Pending
The Home Plate, Inc.
(SP #001-97)
Opequon
50,000 sq. ft. recreational facility on
1.1478 ac. site (B2)
Location:
Corner of Warrior Rd. & Ivory Dr. in Stephens City
Submitted:
01/06/97
Approved:
04/07/97
Carriebrooke (SP #057-96)
Stonewall
Offices on 2.5487 acres (B2)
Location:
rEastsideRt. 642 south of I-81/37/642 interchane
Submitted:
A roved:
Shenandoah Bldg. Supply
(SP #056-9�
Stonewall
Warehouse on 5 acres (M1)
Location:
FGae
Drive (Stonewall Industrial Park)
Submitted:
A roved:
Winchester 84 Lumber
Stonewall
Storage Shed; 1.19 ac. of a 4.98 ac.
(SP #045-96)
tract disturbed (B2)
Location:
Rt. 839
Submitted:
10/14/96
. -�d
pp---w
L hNN " �
PendingI
Miller Milling East Co.
(SP #043-96)
Stonewall
Bldg. Addition (mill) on 0.91 ac. of a
1 82.136 ac. parcel (Ml)
Location:
302 Park Center Drive; Fort Collier Industrial Park
Submitted:
09/23/96
Approved:
04/22/97
Frederick Veterinary Hospital (SP
#037-96)
Opequon
Veterinary Hospital on .50 ac. of a 2.05
1 ac. site (RP)
Location:
East side of A for Rd (Rt. 642); so. of Westmoreland Dr
Submitted:
08/21/96
Approved:
04/09/97
Stimpson/Rt. 277 Oil & Lube
Service (SP #030-96)
Opequon
l
Oil & Lube Serv., Car Wash, Drive -
1 Thru on 2.97 ac. (B2)
Location:
152 Fairfax Pk. (behind Red Apple Country Store)
Submitted:
07/03/96
Approved:
Pending
Flying J Travel Plaza (SP #026-
Stonewall
Travel Plaza on 15 acres (B3)
Location:
S.W. corner of the intersection of I-81 & Rt. 669
Submitted:
05/23/96
Approved:
Pending
Cedar Creek Center (SP #025-96)
Back Creek
Museum on 0.485 ac. of a 3.210 acre
parcel (B1)
Location:
8437 Valley Pike (Rt. 11), Middletown
Submitted:
05/16/96
Approved:
Pending
AMOCO/House of Gifts (SP
#022-96)
Gainesboro
Gas Pump Canopy 880 sq. ft. area of a
0.916 acre parcel (RA)
n:
3548 North Frederick Pike
ted:
EArtoved:
05/08/96
Approved:
Pending
American Legion Post #021 (SP
#018-96)
Stonewall
Addition to lodge building on 3.4255
acre site (B2)
Location:
1730 Berryville Pike
Submitted:
04/10/96
Approved:
Pending
D.K. Erectors & Maintenance,
Inc. (SP #051-95)
Gainesboro
Indust Sery/Steel Fabrication on a 10 -
acre site (M2)
Location:
4530 Northwestern Pike
Submitted:
12/28/95
Approved:
Pending
Wheatlands Wastewater Facility
(SP #047-89)
Opequon
Treatment Facility on 5 Acres (115)
Location:
So. West of Double Tollgate-, ad'. & west of Rt. 522
Submitted:
09/12/89
Note:
Being held at applicant's request.
Flex Tech (SP #057-90)
Stonewall
M1 Use on 11 Ac. NO
Location:
East side of Ft. Collier Rd.
Submitted:
10/25/90
Note:
Being held at applicant's request.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
John D. Powell (Powell's
Plumbing) (CUP #005-97)
Shawnee
Off -Premise Business Sign (RA)
Location:
120 Waterloo Court (off Rt. 50 East)
Submitted:
02/07/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 -recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - Approved
David & Debbie Bragg
(CUP #006-97)
Stonewall
Antique Shop (RA)
Location:
511 Redbud Run (Rt. 66 1)
Submitted:
02/07/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - Approved
Sidney A. Reyes (CUP #004-97)
Gainesboro
I Photography Portrait Studio (RA)
Location:
350 Redland Road, Cross Junction
Submitted:
01/31/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - Approved
Marietta & Kim Walls
(CUP #003-97)
Back Creek
Animal Boarding (RA)
Location:
1207 Cedar Creek Grade (Rt. 622)
Submitted:
01/29/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - Denied
Joseph W. Edmiston
(CUP #002-97)
Back Creek
Dog Kennel (non -boarding) (RA)
Location:
1293 Hollow Rd. (Rt. 707), Lake Isaac Est., Sec. IV, Lot 6;
Submitted:
01/28/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended denial
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - Denied
Derek M. Heishman
(CUP #001-97)
Back Creek
Automobile repair w/o body repair
(RA)
Location:
187 Middle Lane, Gore
Submitted:
01/21/97
PC Review:
03/05/97 - recommended approval
BOS Review:
04/09/97 - Approved
VARIANCES:
Devon Willett (VAR #005-97)
Gainesboro
T 5' side yd for addition to dwelling (RA)
Location:
201 Stonecrest Court
103/21/97
Submitted:
BZA Review:
04/15/97 - A roved
PC REVIEW DATE: 5/7/97
BOS REVIEW DATE: 5/28/97
REZONING APPLICATION #001-97
OMPS FUNERAL HOME, INC.
To Rezone 1.3976 acres of a 32.362 acre tract from RA (Rural Areas)
to B2 (Business General)
LOCATION: This property is Iocated on the west side of Front Royal Pike (Route 522, south of
Winchester) approximately 1,500' north of the intersection of Papermill Road (Route 644) and Front
Royal Pike.
MAGISTERIAL, DISTRICT: Shawnee
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 64-3-A
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
Zoned: Rural Areas District Land Use: Commercial Cemetery
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
North:
Zoned: Rural Areas District
Use: Residential
South:
Zoned: Rural Areas District
Use: Residential; Agricultural; Vacant
East:
Zoned: Rural Areas District
Use: Residential
West:
Zoned: Rural Areas District
Use: Agricultural; Vacant
PROPOSED USE: To establish a funeral home operation
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation: See attached letter from Robert Childress dated March
10, 1997.
Omps Funeral Home, Inc., REZ #001-97
Page 2
April 25, 1997
Frederick Co. Sanitation Authority: Water and sewer are available.
Public Works: The impact analysis statement provided with the request for rezoning is acceptable
as submitted We suggest that consideration be given to diverting storm runoff to the existing pond
located on the property of Sunset Memorial, Inc. to the south. A minor modification to the outlet
structure of this pond may be required to accommodate this runoff.
Fire and Rescue: (1) Fire and Rescue issues will be addressed at the time of site plan submittal.
(2) There are proffers offered by the applicant, payable to the Greenwood Volunteer Fire and
Rescue Company. Comments submitted by the Greenwood Fire and Rescue Company regarding
proffers are to be considered an addendum to these comments, and forwarded to the Planning
Commission, and the Board of Supervisors, for consideration.
Greenwood Fire and Rescue Company: No problems with proffers.
Parks and Recreation: No comment.
County Attorney: Proffers appear to be in proper form.
Frederick Co. Public Schools: See attached letter from Thomas Sullivan dated March 13,
1997.
Planning & Zoning:
1) Site History
The original zoning maps for Frederick County were created utilizing the USGS Quadrangle Series
as the official base map. The Winchester Quadrangle indicates that Shenandoah Memorial Park
was developed prior to the adoption of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on March 13, 1967.
This property was initially assigned an R-1, Residential Limited District classification which was
later down -zoned to A-2, Agricultural General, District, during the comprehensive rezoning action
which occurred on October 8, 1980. This property was reclassified to RA, Rural Areas, District
Omps Funeral Home, Inc., REZ 9001-97
Page 3
April 25, 1997
when the A-1 and A-2 Districts were combined in 1990. The property has maintained the same
zoning classification to date.
2) Location
The property owned by Sunset Memorial, Inc., is located at the northwest quadrant of the
intersection of Front Royal Pike (US 522) and Papermill Road (Route 644). The entire 32.362 acre
tract is located within the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area
(SWSA), as specified in the Comprehensive Plan. The 1.3976 -acre portion of this tract proposed
for rezoning is located approximately 1,500 feet north of this intersection and has 386 feet of road
frontage along Front Royal Pike.
Existing land use within the proximity of this 1.3976 -acre parcel includes low-density residential
use, agricultural use and vacant land. Several residences exist to the north and east of this 1.3976 -
acre parcel. The majority of these residences are within the Memorial Heights subdivision which
is Iocated across Front Royal Pike and is comprised of five one-half acre lots. Land uses to the west
and south of this 1.3976 -acre parcel are located on the far side of the Shenandoah Memorial Park.
3) Site Suitability
The entire 32.362 -acre site contains no environmental features as defined by the Zoning Ordinance
and no historic features identified in the Rural Landmarks Survey. Review agency comments do
not express concern with the development of the 1.3976 -acre portion of this property. Adequate
distance is available for the establishment of a commercial entrance on Front Royal Pike, water and
sewer capacity is adequate and stormwater management can be accomplished through the utilization
of an existing pond.
4) Potential Impacts
The primary impact of this rezoning proposal pertains to increased traffic use at this site. Currently,
traffic flow is limited to those visiting Shenandoah Memorial Park, as well as employees of Sunset
Memorial, Inc. that are responsible for maintenance. The development of a funeral home operation
will increase traffic flow from this site, particularly during evening hours when viewings occur. The
applicant has limited the total development of this parcel to 15,000 square feet. Currently, the
contract owner has an existing facility within the City of Winchester that is 14,500 square feet and
contains 85 parking spaces. The parking space calculations were based on assembly room space,
office space and display space for the entire funeral home operation.
Omps Funeral Home, Inc., REZ #001-97
Page 4
April 25, 1997
The Capital Facilities Impact Model was run assuming a maximum office space development of
15,000 square feet. This model run demonstrated a capital cost of $714.62 to the Fire and Rescue
Services.
5) Impact Statement/Proffer Statement
The applicant has proffered that the 1.3976 -acre portion of this property will be developed only as
a funeral home operation; therefore, all other permitted uses in the B-2, Business General, District
could not be developed on this portion of the site. The applicant has proffered a monetary
contribution for Fire and Rescue Services that is consistent with the capital cost demonstrated by
the Capital Facilities Impact Model. The applicant has proffered to limit access to Front Royal Pike
through the provision of a single commercial entrance to minimize the impact to traffic flow on this
road.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOR 5/7/97 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
The applicant has demonstrated the ability to significantly minimize the impacts to the 1.3976 -acre
portion of this site through the provisions of the proffer statement. The Comprehensive Plan states
that new development within the Urban Development Area should only be approved when roads and
other infrastructure with sufficient capacity have been provided. The four -lane improvements to
Front Royal Pike and the availability of water and sewer with adequate capacity would not be
significantly impacted by the development of a funeral home operation on this site. Staff
recommends approval of this rezoning request.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRQ1N:IA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
EDINBURG RESIDENCY
DAVID R. GEHR
14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE
COMMISSIONER
JERRY A. COPP
P.O- BOX 278
RESIDENT ENGINEER
EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278
TELE (540) 984-5600
FAX(540)984-5"007
March 10, 1997
REZONING COMMENTS: Omps Funeral Home
No overall objections to the rezoning of this property for the stated use. In order to
determine adequate entrance access needs and prior to development, this office will
require a complete set of site plans detailing entrance designs, drainage
features/calculations, and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Manual, 5" Edition for
review. Any work performed on the State's right-of-way must be covered under land
use permits.
This property lies within the limits of our current construction Project #0522 -034 -VI 1,
C501. Any proposed entrance improvements will need to consider our design. I'm
attaching a copy of previous correspondence from this office concerning a
preliminary design plan for this property.
RBC/rf
Attachments
xc: Mr. S.A. Melnikoff
Permits & Subdivision Specialist Supervisor
WE KEEP VIRGINIA ,LOVING
I -A ederick County Public Schools
1415 Amherst Street
Post Office Box 3508
Winchester, Virginia 22604-2546
Telephone: (540) 662.3888 — FAX (540) 722-2788
Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent
March 13, 1997
Mr. Stephen M. Gyurisin
G. W. Clifford & Assoc. Inc.
200 N. Cameron Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
REF: Rezoning Comments
Dear Steve:
I am in receipt of your request for rezoning comments concerning
a parcel of land to be rezoned from RA (Rural Area) to B2 (Business
General). It is my understanding the land to be rezoned is
approximately 1.3976 acres in size and is at the following location:
West side of Route 522 South (Front Royal Pike,
Approximately 1500' north of the intersection of
Route 522 South and Route 644 (Pleasant Valley Road)
We do not believe the proposed rezoning of the property listed
above will have a negative impact on current or future school needs.
If you should have any questions, please do not hesitate in
contacting me at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
Tho/asSullivan
Administrative Assistant
to the Superintendent
cc: R. Thomas Malcolm, FCPS
Location
Map
for
PIN:
64-3--A
Rezoning
#001-97
for OMPS
Funeral
Home
REZONING APPLICATION FORM
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
To be completed by Planning Staff. -
Zoning Amendment Number (001-27 Date Received '1 -
BOS Hearing Date2 g PC Hearing Date
The following information shall be provided by the applicant.-
All
pplicant.
All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of the
Cornmissione. of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 23 Cour-.Square, Winachester.
1. Applicant:
Name: Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc.
Address: 200 N. Cameron Street
W' er. Va 22601
Telephone: 540 667-2139
2. Representative:
Name: Stephen M. G urisin
Telephone: (540) 667-2.139
3. Owner:
Name: Sunset Memorial, Inc.
Address: 1270 Front Royal Pike
Winchester, Va 22602
Telephone: (540) 667-2012
12
8/8/96
The Code _of Virgins allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to rezoning
applications.
Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned:
sunset Memorial, Inc.
Omps Funeral Home, Inc.
4. Zoning Change: It is requested that the zoning of the property be changed
from RA
to B-2
5. Current Use of the Property:
Vacant
6. Adjoining Property:
PARCEL ID NUMBER USE ZONING
64 -A -24/24A/25 Agriculture RA
64-A-26/34/35 Residential RA
64-A-23 Res./Ag. RA
64-((4))-3 Residential RA
64-((4))-4 Residential RA
-5 Residential RA
WA-(lLO) -G: '� L.-4 14 t1
7. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from
nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers):
West side of Route 522 South of Winchester
Approximately 1500' north of the intersection
of Route 644 and Route 522 South.
13 3/9/96
S. Parcel Identification:
14 Digit Tax Parcel Number. 64-3-.A
9. Magisterial District:
Shawnee
10. Property Dimensions: The dimensions of the property to be rezoned.
Total Area: 60,831.60 Square Feet
The area of each portion to be rezoned to a different zoning district category should be noted:
60,831.60 S.F. Rezoned from RA to B-2
Acres Rezoned from to
Acres Rezoned from to
Acres Rezoned from to
11. Deed Reference: The ownership of the property is referenced by the following deed:
Conveyed from: Sunset Memorial, Inc.
Deed Book Number 728 Pages 936
12. Proposed Use: It is proposed that the properly will be put to the following uses.
—. _Funeral Home
13. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application.
Location map
Plat
x
Deed to property
Statement verifying taxes paid_
Agency Comments
X
Fees
X
Impact Analysis Statement
,r
Proffer Statement_
14
8/9/96
14. Signature:
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Fred. ,k
County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map of
Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the property for
site inspection purposes,
I (we) understand that the sign issued to me (us) when this application is submitted must be placed
at the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing and
the Board of Supervisors public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road
right=of-way until the hearing.
I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and accurate to
the best of my (our) knowledge.
Applicant:
5,j n % fNmortz, I
Owner. �1Q
s.aetti-}--
Date: l o / jp&
Swom to and subscribed befor(�me
this day of .—LC -190U
_L1Go
`-'ti,ti�L�"�l
NOTAPi- SEA L
SHIALCY ;_, HERMAN. Not;,:/ PUiiiiC
�T:E� Bucks County
_L�..xwtC�s3i::��13,91-
15
Adjoining Property Owners
Rezoning
Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board
of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property
abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public
right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The
applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the
parcel identification number which may be obtainedfr=pr the office of the Commissioner of
Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located Frederick County
Administrative Building, 107 North Kent Street
Name and Property Identification Number
Address
Name Paul M. Haldeman, Est.
P.O. Box 2800
Pro ertv # 64-((a))-24
Winchester, VA 22604
Name Marguerite G. Haldeman
P.O. Box 74
Property # 64- ((A)) -24A
Winchester, VA 22604
Name Paul M. Haldeman, Est.
P.O. Box 2800
Proverty # 64-((A))-25
Winchester, VA 22604
Name James M. & Mary A. Dodson
3792 Papermill Road
Pro ertv # 64-((A))-26
Winchester, VA 22602
Name Lawrence O.,Jr. & Linda S.
1301 Front Royal Pike
Property # 64-((A))-35 u i an
Winchester, VA 22602
Name Lawrence 0.1 Jr. & Linda S.
Sullivan
1301 Front Royal Pike
Pro erty� ((A))-34
Winchester, VA 22602
Name Doris F. Casey
404 Imperial Street
Pro ercv # 64D- ( (A) ) -23
Winchester, VA 22601
Name Elwood H. & Turessa R. Fox
1231 Front Royal Pike
Pro ertvg 64D-((4))-3
Winchester, VA 22602
Name Elwood H. & Turessa K. Fox
1231 Front Royal Pike
Property # 64D((4))-4
Winchester, VA 22602
Name Elwood H, Sr.&Turessa K. Fox
1231 Front Royal Pike
PropertD((4))-5
Winchester, VA 22602
ZS
Name and Property Identification Number
Address
Name William E. Brathwaite
1257 Front
Winchester,
Royal Pike
VA 22602
Property # 64D((4))-6
Name Ronald R. Russell, Sr.
121 Laurel
Winchester,
Wood Drive
VA 22602
Pro env # 64D-((4))-7
Name
Property #
Name
Proem #
Name
Pro em #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Pro em #
Name
Pro em #
Name
Propem #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Pro em #
REZONING REQUEST PROFFER
77
Sunset Memorial, Inc.
Omps Funeral Home, Inc. V, '
OMPS FUNERAL HOME, INC.
Route 522 South - Front Royal Pike ;
Shawnee Magisterial District - Tax Parcel 64 -((3)) -A1 -
r liminm Matters
Pursuant to Section 15.1 - 491.1 et. seq. of the code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended, and the provisions of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance with
respect to conditional zoning, the undersigned applicant hereby proffers that in the
event the Board of Supervisors of Frederick County, Virginia, shall approve
Rezoning Application #60(-97 for the rezoning of 1.3976 acres from RA, Rural Area
zoning to B-2 Business General zoning, development of the subject property shall be
done in conformity with the terms and conditions set forth herein, except to the
extent that such terms and conditions may be subsequently amended or revised by
the applicant and such be approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in
accordance with Virginia law. In the event that such rezoning is not granted, then
these proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and of no effect whatsoever. These
proffers shall be binding upon the applicant and their legal successors or assigns.
Planni=lssues and Uses
The rezoned property shall be used for a funeral home. The funeral home
shall be 15,000 square feet or less in size.
The rezoned property shall have direct vehicular access via a single
commercial entrance constructed to VDOT standards to US Route 522.
Monetary Contribution of Development
The undersigned hereby voluntarily proffers that if the Board of Supervisors
for the County of Frederick, Virginia approves the rezoning for the 1.3976 acre tract,
more or less lying on the west side of Route 522 South (Front Royal Pike) just north
of the intersection of Route 644 (Papermill Road) in the Shawnee Magisterial
District of Frederick County, Virginia from RA to B2, the owner will pay to
Frederick County, prior to a building permit being issued, the sum of Seven
hundred fourteen dollars and sixty-two cents ($714,62) for Fire and Rescue
Emergency Services costs.
PAGE 2
REZONING REQUEST PROFFER
Sunset Memorial, Inc.
Omps Funeral Home, Inc.
OMPS FUNERAL HOME, INC
Route 522 South - Front Royal Pike
Shawnee Magisterial District - Tax Parcel 64-((3))-A
The conditions proffered above shall be binding upon the heirs, executors,
administrators, assigns and successors in interest of the Applicant and Owner. In
the event the Frederick County Board of Supervisors grant said rezoning and accepts
these conditions, the proffered conditions shall apply to the land rezoned in
addition to other requirements set forth in the Frederick County Code.
Respectfully submitted,
Owner:
By:
rank Milles, Vice -President, Sunset Memorial, Inc.
Date: 4-117 9.7
STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE
CITY OF WINCHESTER, To -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 7 ", day of
:act.,;
My Commission expires Try r3u:!i;
Notary P � lic
PAGE 3
REZONING REQUEST PROFFER
Sunset Memorial, Inc.
Omps Funeral Home, Inc.
OMPS FUNERAL HOME, INC
Route 522 South - Front Royal Pike
Shawnee Magisterial District - Tax Parcel 64-((3))-A
Contract Owner:
IL -By: r
arry Omps, P sident , Omps Funeral Home, Inc.
Date: e -11// r/7
STATE OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE
CITY OF WINCHESTER, To -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
by 1997, Qin 1%
-- __--� =---------------------------
My Commission expires /Qpv _ f/, i7-7 -7
C(: 2e --p ofo P J�
Notary Public
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
for
OMPS FUNERAL HOME, INC
I. Summary
OMPS FUNERAL HOME
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JANUARY 1997
The firm of Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. has been commissioned to
evaluate the above referenced project as required by the Frederick County Board
of Supervisors. This document is prepared in support of and in preparation to
rezone 1.3976 acres of the 32.31 acre property of Sunset Memorial, Inc. from
present Rural Area (RA) to Business General (B-2). The proposed use is a funeral
home.
The property is suited for B-2 zoning for a funeral home. This property adjoins
an existing operating cemetery and is located along the major corridor of Route
522 South. There is a positive fiscal impact associated with the rezoning and
development of this property from RA to B2.
II Introduction
The 1.3976 acre portion of the property of Sunset Memorial, Inc. is located on the
west side of the south bound traffic lane of Route 522 South (Front Royal Pike).
The property currently is vacant. The parcel is identified as tax parcel 64-((3))-A
in the Shawnee Magisterial District and is currently zoned Rural Area (RA).
This rezoning request is for the portion of the property located approximately 300
feet north of Route 644, Pleasant Valley Road, just north of the northernmost
entrance to the Shenandoah Memorial Park.
Business General (B-2) zoning is planned for the property. The property is
located in the Urban Development Area and the Sewer and Water Service Area
and is along a major transportation corridor. A preliminary site development
evaluation indicates that this site can support a variety of commercial uses as
well as the proposed funeral home use. This rezoning is presented to allow the
property to be zoned B-2 and to allow the planned funeral home use.
The proposed rezoning is in conformance with the Frederick County
Comprehensive Plan and policies.
�u
' .,'1 as �' `� prng y7.�y�,j• �. .. - •ill �5 �l I � � ••'• 1 :.
'} � �L� 0 �v� r 'lir �� •,4'r�' -.� r ` :y �. t q�• �• i•� �.•i , .i �-.�•jsh,( ��
J.q'•a� ,:;.' ,;;VPI l !tliiv • ` ' .. ,i . t 1 •(, r a lS
{ :a 7s Imegear9ta• Q ., N�. I \' j,
% . � ' �.'�i� ( V � ,� � �/� �• `rte _ 1' //��
4 * • r� ��'.�: (. �w .nt J I i • 11�/��i, Int pets v11144i
�u�, allCtuo a .,ry
•' .�: ?3-r � - J � p� � :Iq l lir. .I�.1 2 a �.��•� •,
•: y l !,(" �,y dl Y �f = moo fir.
,J -J Pt'a � µ,', `.., ''^� ��'' •�r� r.,+ 'lisp � }✓ �'llj �^'.
:i• l _ S 17 M6
44 • .. •`v "•"''t•r i1� • • r t' 1�r • •• �, Qp� ' lA- 1 , t ,• O • /I'• \ _ l
�•_''�o ro` �� r ��4 Winchester M.
L_\•.'e. s . I !' _\•,,..,. i/ au . Airport
Cem �.�. �: n l l � ) '1.,� � it ,i �/ ♦ •
�• ( �• �••�• tea' _ - �•• 'I,I .� 8M �t✓\� •��
112
1.'pzsSa>, , � 0• p � l,' �: 71f ,'_:� • \\.. l, .i -'' � '�' \
3"
•1 'F i• I f `..,ice 1' j 1 / _ / - Qo I
-
• } L' � / 1 � �,. r� � 650 � ' \
cc `
Shandoaht• _SITE LOCATIOND11 m...- Park
�4
�o
/ \ _ >✓/,I� oyay 4NGEl� �„-� �.'�.�.' —� �. q� \\�/r�e �Ob y� .0 -'i -� ��—T •1..
ceif
1/ ',row �� / � `..� .`�- �.1" � .- - \ ��'� � $'��j•. `.�C,-rr�i� 1` r�� i 1
Skiingq. mfr/ _ _ -
QI •� % � 1
il% �];-/1'`-\.1- •.`Jr� -" _ ;WS �`vr„/f-�'" _�� /off 7•
1-- % `oma a J �\_V !� �_ —' C �...� _�J• Jr".� �� _ V! _ -
hi
LOCATION OF 1.397 ACRE PARCEL TO BE REZONED FROM RA TO B2
E
SITE LOCATION
Zoo
52f aa. zce•pzei 400
0' W 909.73' a
N �/ OX77.8FC938
r _ $87*19'02- W Vi
(Ci
73.20• m a °v
3, Z m a ^
a W -e
Q1 f N
r h� w o
N
•' R! CI � O C
32.362 ACRES Ck
N o c
p m
h
F Z
W m � `�•
° O Q
¢ to N O
a,a�a
3 N Q�
W
La. ;u ^ ,
ul Q N O c" Qf
m
Nin, cc
of
O,
•E
25 , •--
5 Z� • Z 400 �0 6
LOCATION OF 1.397 ACRE PARCEL TO BE REZONED FROM RA TO B2
/..:
JORIS F. CASEY
W8 91 PG 134
N' 87*44.02" E 189.34'
W
s
O _ .
N
CD •t
O �
Z 1.397 ACRES
REMAINOER OF
S U1i jET MEMORIAL. INC.
CS '23 PC 936
TAX PARCEL 6.1_3-A
L:.LT!!
�7 dBERr
�'LEE A.
u-
CSR IIFICA i:f1o_
* 484
�� • i -ANP
C6 S 86.08.38" W
0' 50' 100' 150•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L4
17-7
161.49'
-I
X
0
v� C Z
c(A
a 03
o m��
m�m>
::z- cn
r
"' N —
M
OMPS FUNERAL HOME
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JANUARY 1997
III. Planning Analysis
Site Suitability - The property has no site specific development limiting factors.
The property appears well suited for B-2 zoning use development based on site
evaluation of soils, slopes, wetlands, ponds and lakes, flood plains and other site
suitability and environmental factors.
Soils - The soils are suitable for site development purposes. The USDA Soil Conservation
Soil Survey for Frederick County identifies the soils of the property on map sheet 42 as
Clearbrook channery silt loam..
Prime Agricultural Soils.- The property does not contain prime agricultural soils as
identified by the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan.
Slopes - There are no steep slopes on this property. The topography is ideally suited for
commercial type development. -Slopes are 0% 7%.
Wetlands - There are no wetlands on this property. The property is generally well drained
and has no low lying wet areas that wetland vegetation that indicates the presence of a
wetland area.
Ponds and Lakes - There are no ponds or lakes on the portion of the property proposed for
rezoning..
Flood Plain - The property is not located within the 100 year HUD designated flood plain
as identified on panel map number 510063-00200B of the United States Department of
Housing and Urban Development Flood Boundary map.
Adjoining Properties - Development impacts are slight on adjacent properties.
The primary impact concern on adjoining properties is the change of use from
open,vacant land to a more commercial -like setting for a funeral home. The
proposed use of a funeral home is compatible with the surrounding cemetery
land use.
The adjoining property to the north is zoned rural area and the primary use is
residential. To the east is US Route 522 South and on the opposite side of the
road are residential uses. To the south and west of the property is rural open
land. Surrounding the portion to be rezoned is the Shenandoah Memorial
Cemetery.
OMPS FUNERAL HOME
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JANUARY 1997
Zoning; Review - The property is currently zoned Rural Area (RA) allowing by
right a variety of uses.
Under the Business General (B-2) zoning regulations a variety of retailing and
commercial activities are permitted by right. The proposed funeral home is
permitted in the B-2 zone.
IV. Traffic Impacts
A funeral home is planned on the 1.3976 acre site proposed for rezoning from
RA to B2. The projected size of the funeral home is 6,000 to 15,000 square feet.
The project will be built in one phase consisting of the funeral home building
and associated parking. Access is planned via a commercial entrance on US
Route 522.
Using the ITE Trip Generation manual, 5th Edition, an estimate of the trips
generated by the proposed facility was made using the closest land use type, a
church facility. The findings, as submitted to VDOT for project design, are as
4 follows:
Average weekday volume 140
P. M. peak hour volume 11
Sunday two way volume 549
Weekday volumes are low, while Sunday volumes are high. Sunday volumes
could correspond with typical days funerals are held. Generally, funerals are not
held during the peak hour. By comparison, the existing Omps Funeral Home
located on Amherst Street in Winchester has an average weekday volume of 50 -
trips with 10 employees. The proposed funeral home on US Route 522 South
will have one (1) employee with a projected average weekday volume of less
than ten (10) trips as estimated for the planning department.
Assuming that 80 percent of the trips arrive from the north, the right turn
volume to the site from southbound US Route 522 would be 4.6 vehicles per
hour. Trips exiting the site to northbound US Route 522 during the PM peak
hour are estimated at 4 vehicles per hour and to southbound US Route is one
per hour.
The 1994 VDOT road tabulation acquired from the regional office at Edinburg, Va
indicates that the average daily traffic volume on this section to be 7,800 from the
VA Route 644 intersection to US Route 50. US Route 522 through this section is
currently under reconstruction. The impact on US 522 and the nearby VA
644/US 522 intersection is estimated to be minor.
OMPS FUNERAL HOME
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JANUARY 1997
V. Sewage Conveyance and Treatment Impacts
There are no sewage conveyance or treatment problems associated with this
project.
Sewage service to this site is provided by Frederick County Sanitation Authority
via an 8" sanitary sewer line located on the east side of Route 522. This property
can be served using a 2" force main.
VI. Water Supply Impacts
There are no water supply or transmission problems with this property.
Water service is provided by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority. A 20"
water main located to the east of US 522 is suitable for service to this site.
VII. Drainage Facility Impacts
Proper storm water management planning will result in minimal or no site
drainage impacts. Adequate land is available for on-site storm water detention if
required for site planning. There are no ponds, wetlands or water features on the
portion of the property requested for rezoning.
Predevelopment runoff rates will be maintained using recognized storm water
management standards. These will be defined when a site development plan is
prepared and approved for the site.
VIII. Solid Waste
There are no solid waste collection and disposal impacts.
Commercial private haulers will provide removal to the regional landfill.
IX. Historic Impacts
There are no structures currently located on this property of significance. A
review of the National Register, the Virginia Landmarks Register and The
Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey Report indicates that there are no
known historic structures on this property.
OMPS FUNERAL HOME
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JANUARY 1997
X. Community Facilities
Education - This project will generate no school children and therefore have no
effect on educational cost in Frederick County. There is a positive fiscal impact
projected by Frederick County for the amount of $16,718.
Parks and Recreation - This project would result in no impact on Parks and
Recreational facilities. There is a positive fiscal impact projected by Frederick
County for the amount of $994.00
Emergency Services Cost - No additional fire, rescue or sheriff facilities
anticipated with the development of the property. To offset the fire and rescue
impacts projected by the Frederick County impact model for new capital costs
associated with this rezoning a $714.62 proffer has been provided for Fire and
Rescue.
Fire and rescue services are provided the Greenwood Volunteer Fire & Rescue
Company. The planned B-2 rezoning will have all site development standards
required by the fire code, building code and zoning codes. There are no fire
protection problems associated with this property. All hydrants and fire
protection measures will be installed when the property is developed.
Sheriff Department services for protection of this facility will be minimal.
Routine Sheriff Department patrols should suffice for the majority of time.
There are no special Sheriff Department patrols or services required for the
protection of the property.
XI. Environmental Impacts
There will be certain minor negative impacts due to the construction activity
including run off sediment, noise and traffic movements. These are to be
minimized by proper compliance with local and state laws for environmental
protection. There is no known loss of irretrievable resources involved with this
project.
There are no known endangered species of fauna, flora or wildlife which will be
effected by this project. Ground water and air quality should be unaffected. A
minor impact of a negative nature is associated with lighting for security and
business Lice_ These should he rincPly controller) during planning stage to
minimize the adverse impacts on adjacent residential structures and impacts on
the traveling public.
1"
. !:�y• \fir~ �� f f�ti
+• *k �` •• { . t,: ��,'• � , �: � �� .A "fin r .�; ^=�
' ��. iy"a .�•—•_ y may. *;{ :` y
�' •�tie � � L��Q�'•��,� -- i*. � ��� � 7� t'
Orr
"� ,,/� 4_ i s mow. ���_�l/�?C. ' rte. _M �' t 4• -1.,� '{ ,{ �+
, yw �.� W*- �44
■ ti -, 'mss . �+► �` r, - j. � y '�.� � � _ . w , 4 �. ,► � • =�,� � � � 1,�� �t, � .
IL
�'� `�' � '� '�. .t • .- mfr �, a.' �. ..?a�•
�. � _ .. ,, '� � � : ' _ • lmss�) P. .►-:r:' �-`1:. \ 4 �` � • . / r, g
yI 4s.
- t y ♦ �� ��.iY .!w�j.y�— t� �' sp'. F {+ + �}: ' � �i;� • •�5.. J 1.
Q � �,;, �, - ' � • ., � t �. � �. € �� ,•=':vim �� i
.i w .v f � tr !2!•4 S �' .'� p� (.sem h � :.
OMPS FUNERAL HOME
IMPACT ANALYSIS STATEMENT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
JANUARY 1997
XII. Fiscal Impacts
Fiscal impacts for the property are determined based upon the fiscal impact
model prepared by the Frederick County Department of Planning and
Development staff. The fiscal impact model results are attached.
The model suggests that there is a net positive fiscal impact credit of $241,748.00
by rezoning from RA to B-2.
Capital Costs not covered by County contributions to fire and rescue is suggested
by the model to be $714.62.
MIL Other
This planned zoning change would create a positive fiscal impact as compared to
the existing zoning. There are no known other impacts.
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Eric R Lawrence, Planner II[/
SUBJECT: Discussion Regarding the Interpretation of the Eastern Road Plan
DATE: April 24, 1997
As many Commissioners are aware, the Eastern Road Plan is an element in the County's
Comprehensive Policy Plan that establishes a future arterial and collector road network showing
approximate location of needed road connections. This Eastern Road Plan depicts future road
locations in general terms, allowing for some deviation in location based on detailed design work
conducted at the development stage.
Billy J. Tisinger, representing Jasbo, Inc., has requested an interpretation of the Eastern Road Plan
that affects his client's property. Jasbo, Inc. owns 135 acres of undeveloped land located north of
old Route 642 (Macedonia Church Road), and west of Route 522 in the Stephens City area of the
County.
The Eastern Road Plan identifies a "major collector" road which bisects the 135 -acre property,
traveling in a north -south direction, connecting old Route 642 and Route 522. This connection is
essentially an extension of White Oak Road (Route 636) to the north.
Mr. Tisinger proposes to continue to use the intersection of old Route 642 and White Oak Road as
the southern terminus of the identified "major collector." This intersection is clearly identified on the
Eastern Road Plan, but, Mr. Tisinger proposes to adjust the northern terminus of the "major
collector" to align with the old Route 642 and Route 522 intersection. A map illustrating the Eastern
Road Plan location and Mr. Tisinger's requested alignment is enclosed.
This request was presented to the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) at their
meeting on April 14, 1997. The Subcommittee discussed the potential impacts and benefits
associated with the alignment, and agreed that the proposal was acceptable. Anticipated impacts
include the close proximity of a major collector to the Macedonia Church and Cemetery, and the
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Page 2
Planning Commission Agenda, May 7, 1997
RE: Eastern Road Plan
April 24, 1997
necessity to cul-de-sac old Route 642. Benefits include the enabling the continuation of the collector
east of Route 522, and diverting major collector from being constructed adjacent to Armel
Elementary.
Mr. Tisinger will be available to address any questions. Staff is interested in gaining your input
concerning the advisability of permitting this deviation from the Eastern Road Plan.
Please contact me with any questions.
Enclosures
\eric\common\complan\estroad.pin
BURR P. HARRISON 1904-1973
WILLIAM A.JOHNSTON
H. K. BENHAM =
BILLY J.TISINGER
IAN R.D. WILLIAMS
CHARLES S. MCCANDLISH
BRUCE E. DOWNING
TRAVIS JOSEPH TISINGER
HARRISON 8 JOHNSTON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
POST OFFICE BOX 809
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22604
April 22, 1997
Mr. Evan Wyatt
Frederick County Planning Department
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, VA 22601
Re: Request for a Change in the
Frederick County Transportation Plan
Dear Evan:
STREET ADDRESS:
21 S.LOUDOUN STREET
WINCH ESTER, VIRGINIA 22601
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 540
667-1266
FAX NO.
540-667-1312
Please accept this letter as an explanation of the request
that Jasbo, Inc. is making with regard to a change in the
Frederick County Transportation Plan.
Recently new Route 642 (Tasker Road) was completed and
opened to the public. This provides an east/west corridor for
Tasker Road out to U. S. Route 522 with the intersection at U. S.
Route 522 being about one mile south of where old Route 642 used
to intersect U. S. Route 522. Route 636 is the road that runs
from Route 277 north, crossing Tasker Road, and then intersecting
with old Route 642.
Jasbo, Inc. owns approximately 135 acres that lies basically
west of Macedonia Church and is bordered by old Route 642 on the
south, Wakeland Manor on the west and extends north to Opequon
Creek.
The current Transportation Plan calls for the extension of
Route 636 to cross old Route 642 and curve in such a manner that
it intersects with U. S. Route 522 directly across from Armel
School.
Most of the land, for the extension of this road, as
planned, is owned by Jasbo, Inc. but where the intersection would
be created there are a couple of dwelling houses owned by third
parties that would have to be dealt with in completing the road.
The request for the change is to extend Route 636 north, as
originally planned with it curving out to old Route 642 where it
intersects with U. S. Route 522. The reasons for the request are
as follows:
Mr. Evan Wyatt
Page 2
April 22, 1997
1. The intersection at old Route 642 and U. S. Route 522,
because of the recent construction and four laning of U. S. Route
522, has resulted in an intersection that is more or less level
and has an existing cross-over.
2. That the possibility exists in the future of extending
old Route 642 across U. S. Route 522 in an easterly direction.
3. That the existing Transportation Plan dead -heads the
extension of Route 636 into Armel School with no possibility of
any eastward extension.
4. That the traffic pattern, created by the requested
change, will move a relatively busy intersection away from Armel
School and consequently those dangers associated with busy
intersections especially, in this case, the school bus traffic.
5. That the requested change would use an existing
intersection and not create an additional intersection onto U. S.
Route 522.
6. That the requested change would keep traffic, to a great
extent, out of what will be a relatively large residential
subdivision especially when it is considered that it is next to
Wakeland Manor and other residentially zoned property.
The above is depicted on the drawings submitted by Mark
Smith of Greenway Engineering.
We hope that the above explains the request and that the
same makes good planning sense.
If we can provide more information please advise.
BJT:idw
cc: Mr. James L. Bowman
Sincery,
3 , Tisinq_er
DAVID R. GEHR
COMMISSIONER
� r^
COMMONWI:A,LTH of VIRCINJA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
EDINBURG RESIDENCY.
14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE 'JERRY A. COPP
P -O. BOX 278 RESIDENT ENGINEER
EDINBURG, VA 22824-0278 "..-'._TELE (540) 984-5600
FAX (540) 9845607
April 15,1997
Mr. Mark D. Smith, P.E.
C/O Greenway Engineering
151 Windy Hill Lane
Winchester, VA 22602
Dear Mark:
Ref: Bowman Project
Route 642
Frederick County
This is to confirm our meeting of April 7, 1997 to review your right-of-way concept plan
for the reconstruction of a portion of Route 642 just west of its intersection of Route 522
South. It is my understanding the purpose of this proposed project would be to
provide a direct extension of Route 636, from its current intersection with Route 642,
through your client's property onto Route 522. In keeping with the County's eastern
transportation plan, the roadway would be reconstructed to either minor or major
collector standards.
As I stated, we have no overall objections to this concept. However, we feel a complete
traffic analysis should be conducted to determine impacts, possible benefits and design
requirements. Obvious questions and/or concerns we have at this early stage are as
follows:
1) Your proposed plan would leave a short 450'± section of Route 642 between the end
of your improvements and Route 522. Although this section of roadway was
recently reconstructed in conjunction with our Route 522 project, it would certainly
be inadequate to accommodate the volumes of traffic expected. Any final plan you
submit would certainly need to address this section of Route 642. Additionally
right-of-way acquisition, easements, utility adjustments and funding will need to be
addressed.
2) Improvements to Route 522 will need to be considered. Turn lane expansion as well
as traffic signalization n—Lay very wellbe necessary.
3) Impacts to the existing section of Route 642 between its present and proposed
intersections with Route 636 will need to be addressed. This roadway or a portion
may need to be taken out of the system and/or cul-de-sac installed.
WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING
Mr. Mark D. Smith
Ref: Bowman Project
April 15, 1997
Page 2
4) The Macedonia United Methodist Church currently has an approved site plan on file
with us for commercial entrance and other right-of-way improvements. Their plan
will need to be considered.
5) Recent conversations we have had with Mr. Chuck Maddox of G. W. Clifford &
Associates have indicated the possibility of a proposed roadway through the F. L.
Glaize, III and Jasbo Property to the Route 642/52 intersection. Close coordination
with Mr. Maddox will be necessary if this planned roadway becomes a reality. Any
proposed traffic impacts from this roadway will need to be addressed at this time so
we will know how it affects your proposal.
We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this conceptual plan and look forward to
working with you on this significant project. Please let us know if a meeting with your
client and the County is set up.
Sincerely,
6?,4. --,,z /� &4'�
Robert B. Childress
Trans. Permits & Subdivision
Specialist Supervisor
RBC/ rf
xc: Mr. T. L. Jackson
Mr. K. B. Downs
Mr. S. A. Melnikoff
Mr. B. J. Sweitzer
Mr. Kris Tierney, Attn: Mr. Evan Wyatt
\ \ ROUTE/522 — NBL
ROUTE 52Z-- SBL
1 /
-��
i� GEORGE E. BAGLEY
DB. 611 PG. 302
WAYNE M. SMEDLEY, SR.
BRENDA L SMEDLEY
DB. 835 PG. 1723
MACEDONIA
CEMETERY
ASSOCIATION
DB. 194 PG. 68
DB. 576 PG. 179
EX. R/W PER RTE 522
VDOT PROJECT
# 0522-034-114,
C-501, R/W-201
PROP. 80' R/W
NLO
n
00
N
1
,TH O.F
1 Right of Way Acquisition Exhibit
ROUTE 642
MARK D. SMITH MACEDONIA CHURCH ROAD
No.022837 J4- Opequon District, Frederick County, VA
GREENWAY ENGINEERING
ONAL Engineers 151 WINDY HILL LANE
Surveyors WINCHESTER, VA. 22602
TELEPHONE: (540) 662-4185
Founded in 1971 FAX: (540) 722-9528
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/678-0682
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director
RE: Corridor Appearance and Development Design Standards
DATE: April 24, 1997
During the February 1, 1997 Planning Commission Retreat, staff presented information which
demonstrated the ability to enhance corridor appearance through the embellishment of existing
design criteria. The members of the Board of Supervisors and Planning Commission agreed with
the approach that has been developed by the DRRS, and directed staff to work with the committee
to "fine-tune" this language in an expeditious manner for the purpose of amending the Zoning
Ordinance. As you know, the DRRS has recommended that the following design issues be revised
to enhance corridor appearance:
• Entrance spacing requirements for arterial and collector road systems.
• Boulevard entrance design for arterial road systems.
• Freestanding and building mounted signage.
• Parking lot locations and setbacks.
• Landscaping enhancements including maintenance requirements.
• Building components and underground utilities.
During the April 16, 1997 Planning Commission meeting, proposed design standards for parking
lot locations and setbacks, underground utilities and freestanding and building mounted signs were
presented for discussion. This discussion provided an opportunity for the Planning Commission
to reach a consensus on the approach recommended by the DRRS for these items.
The DRRS will be reviewing proposed design standards for boulevard entrance design and
commercial entrance standards, building components and lighting standards during their meeting
this evening. Staff would like to discuss the proposed design standards for these items with the
Planning Commission during the May 7, 1997 meeting. Staff will begin work with the Chamber
of Commerce, Economic Development Commission, City of Winchester and the development and
design community following this meeting. This will allow the DRRS to receive input from each
group which will be considered during the creation of final draft language. Staff asks that the
Planning Commission review the proposed design standards for discussion. Staff will provide
additional information during the meeting based on the comments made by the DRRS this
evening.
107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
BOULEVARD ENTRANCE DESIGN
New street intersections and new private entrances with arterial roads and major collector
roads whose purpose is to provide access to shopping centers, office parks, industrial
parks, or multi -family residential use shall be designed to separate traffic flow. A raised
island shall be provided that is a minimum of 20 feet in width and 150 feet in length. The
width of the raised island may be reduced to 9 feet when utilized specifically as a left turn
lane to provide for adequate stacking. The raised island shall be provided with CG -6 curb
and gutter and completely landscaped to enhance the appearance of the intersection. A
perpetual maintenance agreement shall be approved by the Virginia Department of
Transportation during the application review process to ensure that the raised island is
adequately maintained.
ENTRANCE REQUIREMENTS
Minimum spacing requirements for new entrances abutting arterial roads and major
collector roads shall be as follows:
250 feet if posted speed limit is greater than 35 mph
200 feet if posted speed limit is 35 mph or less
• Minimum spacing requirements for new entrances may be reduced by 50 feet if the new
entrance is designed to provide shared access for two or more properties.
• Minimum spacing requirements for new entrances on minor collector roads and local
streets shall be 70 feet.
• Minimum distances for new entrances on arterial roads and major collector roads shall be
150 feet from intersections. Minimum distances for new entrances on minor collector
roads and local streets shall be 100 feet from intersections.
• Inter -parcel connectors shall be required to provide alternative access between all
commercial properties. Inter -parcel connectors shall be designed to provide for two-way
traffic flow and shall be physically separated from areas delineated as parking stalls.
BUILDING COMPONENTS
All new and redeveloped commercial structures shall be constructed of building materials
that are consistent with the main entrance or facade. These building materials shall be
designed to prohibit exposed concrete block along any wall viewed from the outside of the
structure.
All outdoor trash receptacle areas and outdoor dumpster areas shall be completely enclosed
with building materials designed to complement the primary structure. Chain-link fencing
with slats shall not be permitted to enclose outdoor trash receptacle areas or outdoor
dumpster areas. Concrete pads shall be required for outdoor dumpster areas to prohibit
parking lot failure caused by heavy equipment loading and unloading.
Mechanical features attached to the building shall be completely screened from view with
building materials designed to complement the primary structure. Parapet walls may be
designed to screen mechanical features located on rooftops,
Mechanical features or utility boxes not attached to the building shall be screened from
view through the use of building materials designed to complement the primary structure
of through the use of landscaping. A variety of plant materials may be utilized to meet
this requirement.
LIGHTING STANDARDS
Staff will present information regarding this topic during the meeting. Items of
consideration include height limitations, type of lighting (ie: sodium, halite), maximum
wattage output\foot candle, and directional\shielded lighting.
FREDERICK
COUNTY
VIRGINIA
ANNUAL REPORT
1996
Prepared by the Frederick County Department
of Planning & Development
Annual Report 1996
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION 1997
Charles S. DeHaven Jr. - Chairman
Stonewall District
John R. Marker - Vice-chairman
Back Creek District
S. Blaine Wilson
Shawnee District
Roger L. Thomas
Opequon District
Terry Stone
Gainesboro District
John Light
Stonewall District
Robert M. Sager
BOS Liaison
Jay D. Cook III
Legal Counsel
FREDERICK COUNTY
Marjorie H. Copenhaver
Back Creek District
Robert A. Morris
Shawnee District
Rick C. Ours
Opequon District
W. Wayne Miller
Gainesboro District
George L. Romine
Member at Large
Vincent DiBenedetto
City of Winchester Liason
Kris C. Tierney, AICP
Secretary
Annual Report 1996
Preface
The Frederick County Annual Report for 1996 is compiled to provide
the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and
citizens with information to evaluate the previous year's planning
activities and to aid in comprehensive planning and development for
the upcoming year. The report has been organized into four sections.
Section one introduces the Role of Planning in Frederick County. The
state of the County and current development trends are highlighted in
section two, Development Activity during 1996. Sections three and
four address Planning Activity during 1996 and Priority Planning
Issues for 1997, respectively.
FREDERICK COUNTY
Annual Report 1996
Table of Contents
Role of Planning in Frederick County
Letter from the Director .......................... 1
Department of Planning & Development
Organizational Chart ............................ 3
The Department of Planning & Development .......... 4
Development Activity during 1996
Frederick County Magisterial Districts Map ........... 7
Population....................................8
Building Permits ............................... 9
New Households and Residential Development ....... 10
Employment.................................11
Violations ................................... 12
Application Reviews ........................... 13
Planning Activity during 1996
Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee .... —21
21
Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee .... 22
Transportation Committee ....................... 23
Route 37 Update ......................... I .... 24
Mapping & Graphics .................... . ...... 24
Battlefield Preservation 26
Historic Preservation ........................... 26
Priority Planning Issues for 1997 ...................... 27
FREDERICK COUNTY
Annual Report 1996
A few words from the Director
As we tally up year-end results for 1996, there are a few Departmental achievements worth noting.
Following up on the recommendations of the Battlefield Network Plan (adopted in 1995) the
Kernstown Battlefield Resource Management Plan was completed in September and adopted by the
Board of Supervisors. A Land Use Plan for the Route 11 North Corridor was completed and
recommendations from the Plan, including the expansion of the County's Sewer and Water Service
Area, were incorporated into the 1997 version of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. The Board of
Supervisors passed a number of ordinance amendments, perhaps the most significant involved the
granting of authority to the Zoning Administrator to approve subdivisions in cases where the Board
has previously approved a Master Development Plan for the site. This eliminates a review by the
Planning Commission, thereby reducing the time, paperwork and expense involved in gaining
approval of such subdivisions.
An examination of growth indicators reveals that the level of development activity remained relatively
high in 1996, with some areas of activity showing significant increases over last year. The number
of residential permits issued rose from 570 in 1995 to 690 last year. There were nine Master
Development Plans submitted compared to five in 1995, and 57 site plans submitted, compared to
52 in 1995 (35 in 1994). Two noteworthy development projects requiring site plan review and
approval were the 500,000 square foot Kohl's distribution warehouse, and an 88,500 square foot
addition on the National Wildlife Federation building (to house their printing operations). Significant
County projects include the completion of the 68,000 square foot County office addition, completion
of Redbud Run School, and beginning of construction of the Juvenile Detention Facility.
New County Office Complex, 107 North Kent Street
FREDERICK COUNTY
1
Annual Report 1996
Arguably, the most significant development within the Department of Planning and Development in
1996 was the departure of our long-time director, Robert Watkins. Bob had been director since 1985
and was responsible for the implementation of a number of significant planning policies and
techniques. One of the most notable was the creation of the County's Urban Development Area
(UDA) boundary which establishes the geographic limit of where urban services will be extended by
the County.
Bob's departure in May of 1996 was followed by the retirement of our Zoning Administrator of eight
years, Wayne Miller, in March of 1997. Wayne was, for all practical purposes, the County's first
Zoning Administrator. In addition to carrying out administrative and enforcement responsibilities,
Wayne instituted a variety of record keeping improvements, as well as bonding procedures that
ensure that the development community meet their responsibilities in creating new public facilities.
By February of 1997, vacant positions had been filled and the Department staff returned to the size
it had been prior to May of 1996. Though currently fully staffed, we are still in what could be termed
a transition period. Given the changes in personnel, it seems an opportune time to re-examine some
of our procedures and policies. In addition to a few new faces, we hope to institute some other
changes which will result in a noticeable improvement in the way the department fulfills its mission.
These changes will not occur overnight. We are still struggling to return to the level of operational
efficiency we had prior to the changes in staff. We are, however, committed to making significant
improvements in the area of public service. It is our aim to make 1997 a year of positive change.
9C C. go..l
FREDERICK COUNTY
2
Annual Report 1996
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
Kris C. Tierney, AICP - Director
Evan A. Wyatt - Deputy Director
Andrew D. Evans, CZA - Zoning
Administrator
Eric R. Lawrence, CZO - Planner II
Michael T. Ruddy, CZO - Planner I
Jeffrey C. Everett - Planner 1
Marcus D. Lemasters - Mapping &
Graphics Manager
Clayton J. Grant - GIS. Technician
Renee' S. Arlotta - Office Manager
Carol I. Cameron - Secretary II
Beth A. Hall - Clerk Typist III
Karen A. Clark - Clerk Typist II
FREDERICK COUNTY
3
Annual Report 1996
The Department of Planning and Development
The following is a brief description of the Planning and Development Department's
structure and role in the community.
Planning Efforts
The Planning and Development Department is responsible for all
short- and long-range planning within the County. The Department
prepares the annual updates to the County's Comprehensive Policy
Plan, Capital Improvements Plan, and Primary and Secondary Road
Improvement Plans. Department staff work with numerus committees
responding to a wide range of issues affecting the County, apply for
and administer various planning -related grants, such as Intermodal
Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) and the Community
Development Block (CDB) grants, assist in economic development
efforts, and lend technical support to various community groups.
One of the more significant areas of planning activity in recent years
has been transportation planning. The staff has been involved with
preparation of the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for
the proposed Route 37 extension in the eastern portion of the County,
preparation of the Winchester Area Transportation Study (WATS),
which encompasses the City of Winchester and a portion of east -
central Frederick County, and has been monitoring the Interstate 81
Study which is being conducted by Virginia Department of
Transportation's (VDOT) consultants.
FREDERICK COUNTY
4
Annual Report 1996
Land Use Applications
Zoning Enforcement
In addition to major planning efforts, the Department reviews all land
use applications within the County. Department personnel have the
authority to act on certain types of applications, such as minor rural
subdivisions, while others require approval by the Planning
Commission, the Board of Supervisors, or the Board of Zoning
Appeals. In cases where applications must go before one of these
bodies, the staff assists the applicant in understanding the formal
review process and prepares a written review and recommendation
on the completed application package.
Another of the Department's responsibilities is the interpretation and
enforcement of the County's subdivision and zoning regulations. All
land within the County is classified as being within one of a number of
"zones" such as Rural Areas (RA Zoning) or General Business (132
Zoning). Each zoning category has a list of land uses which are
permitted with no special approval being required. These uses are
referred to as "by -right" uses. A separate list of uses which require
review and approval of a permit by the Board of Supervisors are
referred to as "conditional uses." Zones are established in any given
area in order to protect residents and landowners within the zone from
intrusion by incompatible neighboring uses.
Zoning enforcement involves responding to inquiries and complaints
concerning land use and development. Complaints are registered,
investigated, and appropriate enforcement action taken. Department
staff try to work with landowners to determine a mutually satisfactory
solution to an ordinance violation. A small fraction of the violations
handled by the Department cannot be resolved through negotiation
and criminal charges must be filed. From that point on, resolution of
the matter is determined through the court system.
FREDERICK COUNTY
±7
Annual Report 1996
For additional information on the activities of the Department or on
any of the following types of land use applications:
Conditional Use Permits
Rezoning of land
Site Plan
Obtaining a Variance
Subdivision of land
Master Development Plan
you can visit the Frederick County Web page at
WWW.su.edu/fredco/index.htm or contact the Department of
Planning and Development by telephone at: (540) 665-5651; or by
mail at: The Department of Planning and Development, 107 North
Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601.
FREDERICK COUNTY
In
Annual Report 1996
Frederick County Magisterial Districts
FREDERICK COUNTY
Annual Re rt 1996
Population
Frederick County continued to experience population growth during
this decade. Since 1990, the annual population growth has averaged
2.7%. The population in 1995 was estimated at 52,000 people and
was estimated to reach 53,200 in 1996. These figures were derived
from the current population estimates prepared by the Virginia Center
for Public Service.
The Virginia Employment Commission has projected that Frederick
County will reach a population of 55,823 by the year 2000. At the
current rate of population growth (2.7%), this figure will be easily
exceeded.
Current Population and Population Projections for Frederick County
population
thousands
70 —
60 —
50 —
40 —
30 —
20 —
10 —
0 —
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 2000 2010
year
,year
1996
1.991
1992
1993
1.994
1995
1996.1
ZOOQ
201010
a, St3ttr
1
$.-
2
Z
3
4
4
Frederick County
45,723
47,700
48,800
49,700
51,200
52,000
53,200
55,823
64,878
Winchester
21,947
22,200
22,400
22,600
22,600
23,100
23,000
24,113
26,234
Total Area
67,670
69,900
71,200
72,300
73,800
75,100
76,200
79,936
91,112
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau -l. Or inia Center or Public Service; final eshmate-2,
provisional estimate -3. Via ma Em to mens Commission -4.
FREDERICK COUNTY
8
Annual Report 1996
Building Permits
Building Permits Issued in Frederick County for
New Residences in 1996
Single Family
'WdW Mobile Hos
Mrdd family
Building permits were issued for the construction of 690 new homes
in Frederick County during 1996. This is an increase of 21 percent
from 1995's figure of 570 building permits. In 1996, the number of
new residential building permits issued for single family residences
remained similar to the number issued in 1995. The percentage of new
residential building permits issued for multi -family and mobile homes
increased by 29 percent and 151 percent, respectively. The number of
permits for new mobile homes exceeded the previous high figure for
permits issued in one year which was 140 in 1994.
Building Permits Issued for New Residential Units (1986 - 1996)
Year
S111gle
Multi-
Mobile
Total
l 4wily
family
Homes
1986
463
53
67
583
1987
642
242
85
969
1988
661
244
75
980
1989
682
238
59
979
1990
459
262
59
780
1991
385
148
61
594
1992
381
99
40
520
1993
447
202
62
711
1991
451
141
140
732
1995
412
102
56
570
1996
417
132
141
690
FREDERICK COUNTY
E
Annual Report 1996
New Households and Residential Development
The number of residential lots created in rural and urban areas of the
County is determined by the number of lots created as a result of
subdivision applications (urban) and administrative subdivisions (rural)
that were approved.
The number of residential lots created in the rural portions of
Frederick County increased in 1996. Eighty-eight rural residential lots
were approved during 1996 as opposed to sixty-one in 1995. The
number of residential lots created in urban portions of Frederick
County once again declined in 1996. Seventy-one urban residential
lots were created as opposed to eighty-six in 1995.
Residential Development in Frederick County for 1996
Rural Lots Urban Lots
88 71
Seven master development plans were approved in 1996. Three of the
plans were for for commercial / industrial purposes with the remaining
four for residential purposes. The four residential plans propose 271
new residential dwellings which is considerably higher than in 1995
when only fifty-six were proposed. The average gross density of the
master development plans approved in 1996 was 2.15 dwellings per
acre. This is an increase in density from 1995 when the average gross
density was 1.8 dwellings per acre.
FREDERICK COUNTY
10
Annual Report 1996
Employment
The Virginia Employment Commission states that employment within
the private sector in 1996 was 13,219. This is an increase of 2.3
percent over the 1995 total of 12,921.
The following figure highlights the percentage of total employees in
each employment sector for 1996. As evidenced in the figure,
manufacturing continues to play a major role in Frederick County's
economy accounting for 32.3 percent of total private employment.
The percentage of people employed in service related jobs increased
to 18.7 percent of the total private employment in 1996. This is up
from 17.2 percent in 1995. The percentage of employment in the other
sectors remained similar to in recent years.
Percentage of Employment by Sector in Frederick County, 1996
Construction 323%
Agricukure
r 4.7%
Transportation
6.4%
7.8°/O 18.7%
bfanufacturing
15.3%
Wholesale Trade Services
Retail Trade Finance, Insurance, Real Estate
FREDERICK COU N TY
11
Annual Report 1996
Violations
Percentage of Violations by Magisterial District
in Frederick County, 1996.
Gain�fboro
Op�quon
Back Cr..k
5tonrwal!
In 1996, 51 zoning ordinance violations were investigated by the
Frederick County Planning Department. This figure was slightly less
than in 1995 when 73 zoning violations were filed. The relatively low
number of violations in 1996 can be attributed to the reduced level of
staffing that existed for the majority of 1996. With full staffing in
place, the number of violations investigated, and ultimately resolved,
by planning staff can be expected to substantially increase during
1997.
As in 1995, the Back Creek Magisterial District had the majority of
violations in 1996 with 19. This was followed by the Stonewall
Magisterial District which increased from only a couple of violations
in 1995 to 13 violations in 1996. The majority of complaints received
by planning staff were once again about citizens who store too many
inoperable vehicles on their property or those who do not screen them
properly.
FREDERICK COUNTY
12
Annual Report 1996
Application Reviews
The Planning and Development Department reviewed a significant
number of development applications, plans, and permits during 1996.
The table below highlights the number of development applications
reviewed in Frederick County during 1996.
Summary of Development applications reviewed in 1996
:: ,t�p}�li�attan
Pending.
WiEl7[Ix<:twn
Appr6ved
Variances
20
Conditional Use Permits
15
Site Plans
46
Rezonings
6
Master Development Plans
7
Subdivisions
10
Administrative Subdivisions
88
Action Takm
Denied'
Pending.
WiEl7[Ix<:twn
lWal
0
0
1
21
0
0
2
17
0
10
1
57
0
0
1
7
1
0
1
9
0
0
1
11
0
45
0
133
Source: Frederick County Department ojPlanning and Development
The figures that follow on the next page show the recent history of
applications and permits reviewed by planning staff. A brief
examination of these figures indicates that the level of development
activity remained relatively high during 1996, with some areas of
activity showing significant increases over recent years. There were
nine Master Development Plans submitted in 1996 compared to five
in 1995. Also, fifty-seven site plans were submitted in 1996 compared
to fifty-two in 1995. A list of each specific application submitted
during 1996 is enclosed following the figures on the next page.
FREDERICK COUNTY
13
Annual Report 1996
Types of Applications and Permits Reviewed (1990 - 1996)
Variances
Master Development Plans
`90 `91 `92 `93 `94 `95 `96
FREDERICK COUNTY
14
Conditional Use Permits
`90 `91 `92 `93 `94 `95 `96
Rezonings
Annual Report _ 1996
Rezonings Reviewed in 1996
NA ME '
APPLICANTS NAME
:.1Y W`
,A(�fi�i` 11 ST�y,�rRIj.
L 1~p7yd A .
MAGISTERIAL
y„f4��}��yl'�;�f; r
�f./11.FYRd%iY
¢.aik#m
jy�j;”
UNITS
ACUAGE
DISIRUCT
-:DAT
001-96
HILL VALLEY
RP
1-96 FRED.MALL LAND TRUST
RA
RP
26.14
ST
w/drawn
002-96 RAYMOND L FISH
B2/RA
B3
4
ST
6/12/96
003-96 RICHARD L HEISEY
RA
B2
1.43
BC
6/I2/96
004-96 VALLEY MILL ESTATES
RA
RP
1.07
SH
9/11/96
005-96 SCULLY LTD.
B1
B2
0.58
OP
9/11/96
006-96 H. CLAY DEGRANGE EST
RA
B2
51.05
GA
2/12/97
007-96 VALLEY PROTEINS, INC
RA
M2
1.62
GA
12/11/96
Total Rezonings Approved .• 6 Acres Rezoned RP: 27.2
Total Acres Rezoned: 85.9 Acres Rezoned B2: 53.1
Master Development Plans Reviewed in 1996
Acres Rezoned B3: 4
Acres Rezoned M2: 1.6
Total MDP's Approved.- 7 Total RP Approved: 4 Average Density: 2.15 lots
Total Acres Approved. • 282.75 Total RP Units Approved.- 271 per acre
Total RP Area Approved.• 125.5
FREDERICK COUNTY
15
APPLICANTS NAME
ZC NWG
DWELLING
TOTAL,
MAGISTERIAL
FINAL
UNITS
ACUAGE
DISIRUCT
-:DAT
001-96
HILL VALLEY
RP
54
26.12
SH
9/27/96
002-96
PREST. PLACE PHASE II
RP
-
-
SH
Denied
003-96
WHITEHALL BUS. PARK
B3/M1
-
37/15.04
ST
6/6/96
004-96
MOSBY STATION
RP
-
-
SH
Merged
005-96
MOSBY STATION I & II
RP
85/17
35.5/17.3
SH
i in196
006-96
CHAPEL HILL
RP
35
15.04
SH
9/17/96
007-96
WOODSIDE 11
RP
80
31.57
OP
1/24/97
008-96
CARRIEBROOKE
B2
-
20
SH
1/6/97
009-96
FRED CONI -81 IND PK
M2
-
85.18
BC
12/13/96
Total MDP's Approved.- 7 Total RP Approved: 4 Average Density: 2.15 lots
Total Acres Approved. • 282.75 Total RP Units Approved.- 271 per acre
Total RP Area Approved.• 125.5
FREDERICK COUNTY
15
Annual Report 1996
Subdivisions Reviewed in 1996
Total Subdivisions Approved. • 9
Total Lots Approved. • 81
Total Acres Approved. • 339.3
Total RP Approved: 5
Total RP Lots Approved. • 71
Total RP Area Approved.- 108.95
Average Density: 0.65 lots per acre
FREDERICK COUNTY
16
001-96
FREDERICKTOWNE ESTATES
RP
30
11.34 OP
05/28/96
002-96
PREMIER PLACE
B2
4
5 SH
04/10/96
003-96
AIRPORT BUS CTR
Ml
2
195.39 SH
06/14/96
004-96
FREDERICKTOWNE ESTATES
RP
33
9.98 OP
07/30/96
005-96
WRIGHT'S RUN LTD
Ml
2
196.56 SH
Pending
006-96
PEGASUS BUS. CTR.
B2
2
1.78 SH
Pending
007-96
EASTGATE COMMERCE CT
Ml
2
28.85 SH
01/06/97
008-96
VILLAGE AT SHERANDO
B2
2
1.14 OP
11/20/96
009-96
HILL VALLEY SEC, 1-4
RP
2
26.12 ST
02/27/97
010-96
MCGUIRE HILLS
RP
4
27.72 ST
01/06/97
011-96
BASS HOOVER ELEM. SC
RP
2
33.79 OP
01/22/97
Total Subdivisions Approved. • 9
Total Lots Approved. • 81
Total Acres Approved. • 339.3
Total RP Approved: 5
Total RP Lots Approved. • 71
Total RP Area Approved.- 108.95
Average Density: 0.65 lots per acre
FREDERICK COUNTY
16
Annual Report 1996
Site Plans Reviewed in 1996
001-96
ESTES EXPRESS LINES
OFFICE/TRANSFER STATION
ST
03/20/96
002-96
NAT WILDLIFE FED
INDUSTRIAL
ST
02/20/96
003-96
NEGLEYLAND
OFFICE/EQUIPMENT STORAGE
ST
01/31/96
004-96
HIGH ZONE WATER SYST
IMPROVEMENT -WATER STORAGE
GB
02/28/96
005-96
AT&T POP BLDG
POINT OF PRESENCE BLDG
ST
05/14/96
006-96
STOWE-WOODWARD VBP
OFFICE ADDITION
BC
03/22/96
007-96
PEGASUS BUSINESS CTR
OFFICE/MISC. RETAIL
SH
11/27/96
008-96
H.N. FUNKHOUSER & CO
FAST FOOD & GAS
SH
03/18/96
009-96
MCELROY METAL, INC.
METAL FABRICATION
ST
03/27/96
010-96
DOMINION KNOLLS
44 TOWNHOUSE UMTS
ST
W/drawn
011-96
SENSENY RD ELEM SCHO
EDUCATION
SH
07/19/96
012-96
B.I. CHEMICAL
WAREHOUSE/OFFICE
SH
05/16/96
013-96
TOAN & ASSOC/NOLAND
DISTRIBUTION WAREHOUSE
ST
04/11/96
014-96
GLAIZE TRUSS COMPONE
BUILDING ADDITIONS
SH
05/20/96
014-96
GLAIZE TRUSS COMPONE
BUILDING ADDITIONS
SH
05/20/96
015-96
C.E.D. ENTERPRISES
MINERAL PROCESSING
BC
05/30/96
016-96
DAWSON INVESTMENTS
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
BC
04/03/96
017-96
LEASE BLDG #3
WAREHOUSE/INDUSTRIAL
ST
05/24/96
018-96
AMERICAN LEGION
ADDITION TO POST HOME
ST
Pending
019-96
STONEWALL ELEM
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
ST
10/21/96
020-96
PARKVIEW APTS.
APARTMENTS
SH
12/26/96
021-96
SHEN PRESBYTERY CORP
CHURCH BUILDING
OP
07/11/96
022-96
AMOCOMOUSE OF GIFTS
GAS PUMP CANOPY
GA
Pending
023-96
DR RAYMOND FISH
RETAIL SPACE
ST
03/27/97
024-96
JOHNNY BLUE
PORTABLE TOILETS
ST
07/10/96
025-96
CEDAR CREEK CTR
MUSEUM
BC
Pending
026-96
FLYING J TRAVEL PLAZ
TRAVEL PLAZA
ST
Pending
027-96
THE CORNERS RESTAURA
ADDITION
BC
10/23/96
028-96
STONEWALL MINI-STORA
STORAGE BLDGS
ST
01/23/97
029-96
C.E.D. ENTERPRISES
SAND MANUFACTURING
BC
07/17/96
030-96
STIMPSON-RT. 277
OIL & LUBE SERVICE
OP
Pendine
FREDERICK COUNTY
17
Annual Report 1996
cont'd.
031-96
CAROUSEL FROZEN TREA
FROZEN TREAT STAND
032-96
FURLONG'S SHEETMETAL
SHEET METAL FABRICATION
033-96
LEASE BLDG #3 -PH. II
COMMERCIAL
034-96
KOHL'S DIST FACILIT
WAREHOUSE DISTRIBUTION
035-96
KENNETH D. KOVACH
INDUSTRIAL
036-96
WINCH REG AIRPORT
T -HANGARS
037-96
FREDERICK VETERINARY
VETERINARY OFFICE
038-96
STEPHENSON EMMANUEL
CHURCH BUILDING
039-96
PRESTON PL TOWNHOUSE
TOWNHOUSE UNITS
040-96
GARRETT DENTIST OFFC
DENTIST OFFICE
041-96
PREMIER PLACE TRAVEL
TRAVEL AGENCY/RESIDENCE
042-96
ALLIED WOOD PRODUCTS
ENTRANCE UPGRADE
043-96
MILLER MILLING EAST
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL
044-96
HILLTOP HOUSE NURSIN
ADDITION TO NURSING HOME
045-96
WINCHESTER 84 LUMBER
STORAGE SHED
046-96
TOAN & ASSOC.
KRAFT WAREHOUSE ADDITION
047-96
JAMES WOOD H. S.
ATHLETIC FIELDS
048-96
DAVENPORT INSULATION
FACILITY EXPANSION
049-96
APPLELAND DRIVING RA
GOLF DRIVING RANGE
050-96
VIRGINIA APPLE STORA
WAREHOUSE
051-96
NW REGIONAL JUV DETN
JUVENILE DETENTION FACILI
052-96
NEGLEY MINI -STORAGE
MINI -STORAGE FACILITY
053-96
LEASE BLDG 3 ADDITIO
WAREHOUSE ADDITION
054-96
KLINE'S MILL SUBSTAT
ELECTRIC UTILITY SUBSTATI
055-96
ALC, INC.
MANUFACTURING/OFFICE
056-96
SHENANDOAH BLDG SUPP
OFFICE TRAILER
057-96
CARRIEBROOKE
OFFICES
Total Site Plans Approved. • 46
FREDERICK COUNTY
18
DISTRICT APPROVEDI
GB
7/31/96
ST
10/22/96
ST
07/29/96
SH
01/31/97
SH
11/19/96
SH
12/06/96
OP
Pending
ST
12/06/96
SH
10/31/96
OP
10/28/96
SH
11/18/96
ST
10/08/96
ST
Pending
ST
01/03/97
ST
Pending
GA
03/20/97
GA
03/04/97
ST
11/26/96
BC
01/08/97
SH
04/03/97
ST
01/22/97
ST
01/13/97
ST
01/30/97
BC
12/04/96
SH
02/20/97
GA
Pending
SH
Pending
Annual Re ort 1996
Conditional Use Permits Reviewed in 1996
F I'll;'
. 4 { DIST
MAR
. ",; /, , DATA
{N
001-96
HOWARD A POHN
BLACKSMITH
GA
04/10/96
002-96
ROBT E ROSE MEM
ADULT CARE FACILITY
ST
04/24/96
003-96
DAVID A. KELLER
ARCHERY RANGE
GA
05/22/96
004-96
GARY VAN METER
RETAIL NURSERY SALE
SH
07/10/96
005-96
LEE R. SMELTZER
APPLIANCE SALES/REPAIR
BC
07/10/96
006-96
KEVIN W. FOX
RECORDING STUDIO
SH
07/10/96
007-96
ROBERT C. FOWLER
OUTDOOR SHOOTING RANGE
GA
10/09/96
008-96
AMERICAN NEON SIGN
OFF-SITE BUS. SIGN
BC
W/drawn
009-96
KENNETH C. POOLE, JR
AUTO REPAIR
GA
09/I 1/96
010-96
JENNIFER B. HARRIS
TOOL SHARPENING
OP
09/11/96
011-96
JAKE T. MILLER
BREEDING KENNEL
BC
W/drawn
012-96
PEGGY RUBLE
SHALE MINING
OP
12/11/96
013-96
PAINTER-LEWIS
HOGUE CREEK COUNTRY
GA
12/11/96
MARKET
014-96
GARRIS/EVA POLING
ANTIQUE SHOP
GA
12/11/96
015-96
WADE MARROW
AUTO REPAIR SHOP
BC
12/11/96
016-96
NORRIS WESTOVER
COMMERCIAL BAKERY
BC
01/08/97
017-96
CHARLES W. ROSE JR
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR
GA
02/12/97
Total Number of CUP's Approved: 15
FREDERICK COUNTY
19
Annual Report 1996
Variances Reviewed in 1996
Total Number of Variances Approved: 20
FREDERICK COUNTY
20
CAMS
001-96
PHILIP/JANICE YOUNT
GA
03/19/96
002-96
ANDREW J. MAGUSCHAK
BC
04/16/96
003-96
ROBERT EMMONS, JR.
ST
04/16/96
004-96
VERLO V CUTSHAW
ST
06/18/96
005-96
RICHARD SCOTT
OP
05/21/96
006-96
HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS
OP
05/21/96
007-96
LANZETTA, DONATO
SH
w/drawn
008-96
LEONARD ELLIS, JR
ST
06/18/96
009-96
EDDIE ROBERTS, SR.
ST
08/20/96
010-96
DAVENPORT INSULATION
GA
07/16/96
011-96
DARIAN ANDERSON
ST
07/16/96
012-96
RICHARD A. KEELER
ST
08/20/96
013-96
DANNY MAXWELL
SH
08/20/96
014-96
WILLIAM/MARY HUNT
OP
09/17/96
015-96
AARON L. MITCHELL
BC
09/17/96
016-96
GENE E. WELCH
OP
10/15/96
017-96
GLAIZE & BRO.
SH
10/15/96
018-96
HARPER, ANTHONY
ST
10/15/96
019-96
HARRY J. MICHAEL
BC
11/19/96
020-96
CHUCK/JANE EWING
ST
11/27/96
021-96
DANIEL E. BECKWITH
GA
12/17/96
Total Number of Variances Approved: 20
FREDERICK COUNTY
20
Annual Report 1996
Planning Activities during 1996
The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee
The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee reviews and
discusses various requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan
text and for extensions of the Urban Development Area or Sewer and
Water Service Area. The Subcommittee also conducts detailed studies
of designated areas of the County and develops guidelines for future
land use within those areas.
The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee completed the
update of this year's Comprehensive Policy Plan. As usual, much of
the work consisted of updating statistical information such as school
enrollment and population figures. A number of minor editorial
corrections where also made. Additional items that were modified
included the Sewer and Water Service Area map and the Eastern
Road Plan map.
By far the most significant additions to the plan were the comprehen-
sive plan's goals and action plan, and the goals and policies from the
Route 11 North Land Use Plan. The policies for the Route 11 North
area are derived from the plan prepared by the Comprehensive Plans
and Programs Subcommittee after months of work and a community
meeting at the Stonewall Ruritans building.
The subcommittee also reviewed and recommended project priorities
for the 1997 Capital Improvements Plan. The staff and subcommittee
continue to use the capital improvements evaluation system consisting
of seven weighted criteria to aid in prioritization of requested projects.
The draft of the Capital Improvements Plan has been prepared and
went before the Planning Commission in February of 1997.
>FREBERICK COUNTY
21
Annual Report 1996
Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee
The Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) is
responsible for considering issues and proposals that are related to the
Frederick County Zoning Ordinance (Chapter 165 of the Code of
Frederick County), and the Frederick County Subdivision Ordinance
(Chapter 144 of the Code of Frederick County).
During 1996, the DRRS completed several significant items as
directed by the Board of Supervisors and the Planning Commission.
These items involved the development of a Vested Rights Policy
Statement for Frederick County, the development of new standards
for the Planning Commission's By-laws pertaining to tabling
proceedures, and the development of administrative approval
proceedures for commercial and industrial subdivisions within master
planned industrial and business parks. In addition, the DRRS
Subcommittee successfully addressed other isssues as described
below.
The DRRS addressed the issue of providing flexibility in buffer and
screening requirements through the creation of language to permit
common shared buffer and screening easements and limited use areas
in master planned industrial parks. The Subcommittee also provided
for the inclusion of assisted living care or adult living care facilities as
a permitted use with conditional use permits or by -right with
associated performance standards.
The development of survey standards for Frederick County which
would apply to all zoning districts was finalized by the DRRS during
1996. In addition, the DRRS recommended amendments to the
Zoning Ordinance to allow outdoor batting cages in the B-2 zoning
district with associated performance standards, and to allow self-
service storage facilities in the M-1 zoning district with associated
performance standards. The Subcommittee also recommended
elimination of language for zero lot line developments prohibiting
windows on the zero lot line side of the residence in the Residential
Performance District.
FREDERICK COUNTY
22
Annual Report 1996
Transportation Committee
The Subcommittee will be finalizing work on the creation of new
standards for telecommunication towers for Frederick County in early
1997, and will begin work on the development of enhanced corridor
design standards. In addition, the Subcommittee will be examining the
feasibility of establishing a commercial/industrial flex tech zoning
district during 1997.
The Transportation Committee is responsible for considering all
transportation and road improvement issues for Frederick County.
The Transportation Committee is established by the Board of
Supervisors and makes recommendations on all transportation issues
to the Board through the Planning Commission.
During 1996, the Transportation Committee held public hearings for
the review and approval of the Frederick County Primary Road
Improvement Plan and the Frederick County Secondary Road
Improvement Plan. The Primary Road Improvement Plan was
presented to Transportation Secretary Martinez' and representatives
of the Virginia Department of Transportation during the March 1996
Pre -allocation Hearing, and the Secondary Road Plan was updated to
include new hard surface improvement projects and incidental
construction projects.
The Transportation Committee worked with the Frederick County
Sheriffs Department to secure funds through the Division of Motor
Vehicles Highway Safety 402 Grant Program to accommodate
additional DUI checkpoints, speed checkpoints and neighborhood
patrols. The Transportation Committee considered several citizens
requests pertaining to the establishment of a no through truck traffic
policy on Westmoreland Drive, the reduction of the posted speed limit
along Valley Pike from the southern town limits of Middletown to
Belle Grove Road, and the improvement to Boundary Avenue under
the Virginia Department of Transportation Rural Addition Program.
The Boundary Avenue request will continue into the 1997 calendar
year.
FREDERICK COUNTY
23
Annual Report 1996
Route 37 Update
Mapping & Graphics
The Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Route 37
east extension was originally to have been submitted to the Federal
Highway Administration (FHA) in March of 1997; however as a result
of a number of issues, an extension will be necessary. FHA approval
of the project is required prior to proceeding with detailed engineering
and ultimately, construction of the extension. It is now estimated that
the FEIS will be completed and submitted in the fall of 1997. It is also
hoped that the Virginia Department of Transportation will make some
funding available for this project as part of their fiscal year 1997-98
allocations.
The Data Processing Department is currently installing a central file
server and connecting the other departments into a network or
"intranet". This system will allow county departments to
communicate through e-mail and to share files stored on the main file
server in Data Processing.
FREDERICK COUNTY
24
S
Annual Report 1996
The Mapping and Graphics staff, with the aid of interns, has stepped
up its efforts to furnish a working GIS database to be housed in the
new intranet. Parcel identification numbers are being placed in each
of the parcel "polygons" on the digital tax mapping. This number will
then be the common identifier that the mapping and databases will use
in the Geographic Information System. These GIS base maps are
nearing completion and programming of special applications is being
generated. As the different departments procure the needed software
and hardware to accomplish GIS activity, the Planning Department
will continue to update current information, create new GIS related
data, and perform special application programing and interfaces.
Eventually, the Mapping staff will begin a total "migration" to an
ArcView/ArcINFO/ArcCAD type of mapping environment for data
creation and management. AutoCAD would only be used to digitize
large and complicated development.
In addition to the current mapping efforts, as information is shared
with the public and other departments within the county and agencies
within the state, requests for information and mapping in both digital
data and hard copy has increased annually in some areas as much as
800%. The Planning Department's desire is that as the other
departments come on-line with the intranet, that they will aggressively
take over some of the mapping creation and information distribution,
thereby, allowing Planning to pursue acquiring and creation of new
data.
Also, the staff have been actively involved in the creation of a County-
wide web page on the internet. A central homepage with 18 satellite
pages has been hosted by Shenandoah University. County staff are
currently researching and implementing plans to create a County web -
serving site and County -wide internet use in conjunction with an area -
wide effort to create an internet community.
FREDERICK COUNTY
25
Annual Report 1996
Battlefield Preservation
Historic Preservation
The Battlefield Task Force completed the Frederick County -
Winchester Battlefield Network Plan in fall 1995. The plan was
adopted by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in December
1995. Adoption of the plan by the Winchester City Council occurred
in July 1996.
The Battlefield Network Plan describes goals for the network and
includes strategies and actions to be undertaken to achieve these
goals. A substantial public effort was undertaken in order to produce
the plan for the battlefield park network. A battlefield park network
in Frederick County and Winchester will provide substantial economic
and educational benefits.
Preservation of historically significant properties in Frederick County
continues to be of the utmost importance to the Historic Resources
Advisory Board (HRAB). Adhering to a recommendation of the
recently adopted Battlefield Network Plan, a Resource Management
Plan was conducted for the Kernstown Battlefield by the consulting
firm OCULUS. The HRAB participated in the plans development,
reviewing draft documents and participating in public forums to
discuss important issues the plan should address. The HRAB
recommended adoption of the plan in July 1996. The Kernstown
Battlefields Resource Management Plan was accepted by the Board
of Supervisors on October 9, 1996.
FREDERICK COUNTY
26
Annual Report 1996
Priority Planning Issues for 1997
Amend Zoning Ordinance to require review prior to construction of
telecommunication towers
Revenue sharing, design and construction of Warrior Road from Rt. 277
to Rt.. 642
Push for completion of Winchester Area Transportation Study
Land use study of Northeastern Frederick County
Update the County's Fiscal Impact Model
Begin comprehensive update of Zoning Ordinance
Evaluate/Revise Comprehensive Plan policies west of Route 37 to
accommodate sewer extension
Develop and implement "user friendly" application processing procedure
Develop improved commercial design standards
Amend Ordinances to accommodate "flex -tech" space
Establish Joint Frederick County / Stephens City Planning Committee
Implementation of Phase II of GIS effort
Institute 15.1-456 review of public improvement projects as required by
code
Completion of Rose Memorial Home and CDB Grant
FREDERICK COUNTY
27