The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 10-04-00 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building Winchester, Virginia OCTOBER 4, 2000 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) August 16, 2000 and September 6, 2000 Minutes ............................. A 2) Committee Reports ................................................ (no tab) 3) Citizen Comments ................................................. (no tab) PUBLIC HEARING 4) Conditional Use Permit #16-00 of James E. Smelser for a shale mining operation with sales. The property is located at 1557 Green Spring Road and is identified with Property Identification Number 21-A-27 in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. (Ms.Lohr)........................................................... (B) 5) Proposed Amendments to the Frederick County Code, Chapter 165, Zoning, amending Article X, Business and Industrial Zoning Districts, Section 165-82.B, B2 (Business General) District. The proposed amendment would modify the allowed uses in the B2 Zoning District to permit commercial sport and recreation clubs. (Ms.Lohr)...........................................................(C) 6) Update of the 2001-2002 Frederick County Secondary Road Improvement Plan (Ms.Lohr)...........................................................(D) 7) Request to expand the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to incorporate eight acres of parcel 86-A-156, owned by Investment Land Trust (Thomas J. Chasler Trustee), zoned RA, Rural Areas District, located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection at Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and White Oak Road (Route 636). (Mr. Wyatt)..........................................................(E) a J 8) Request to extend water and sewer service outside of the SWSA to serve parcel 86-A- 209, owned by Linwood Ritter, zoned MH -1, Mobile Home Community District, located at the intersection of Hudson Hollow Road (Route 636) and Spotswood Court. (Mr. Wyatt).......................................................... (F) 9) Request to expand the Urban Development Area (UDA) to incorporate 82 acres of parcel 85-A-138, owned by Dorothy Carbaugh, zoned RA, Rural Areas District, located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012). Currently, 23 acres of the 105 -acre parcel is located within the UDA. (Mr. Wyatt)..........................................................(G) 10) Other October 4, 2000 Planning Commission Page 2 MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on August 16, 2000. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; John R. Marker, Vice -Chairman, Back Creek District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; W. Wayne Miller, Gainesboro District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Gene E. Fisher, Citizen at Large; Sidney A. Reyes, Board Liaison; Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; Kris C. Tierney, Secretary STAFF PRESENT: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director; Amy M. Lohr, Planner 11; Howard R. Long, III, Planner I; Jeremy F. Camp, Planner I; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. MINUTES - JUNE 7, 2000, JULY 5, 2000, & JULY 19 2000 Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Kriz, the minutes of June 7, 2000 were unanimously approved as presented. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Kriz, the minutes of July 5, 2000 were unanimously approved as presented. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Kriz, the minutes of July 19, 2000 were unanimously approved as presented. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of August 16, 2000 Page 540 -2 - COMMITTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) - 08/14/00 Mtg. Mr. Robert M. Morris, subcommittee member, reported that the CPPS discussed the Comprehensive Policy Plan Updates, they reviewed the nearly completed Northeast Land Use Plan, and they also looked at a minor modification to the South Frederick Land Use Plan in the area of Kernstown at Route 37 and I-81. Sanitation Authority (SA) - 08/15/00 Mtg. Mr. W. Wayne Miller, liaison to the Sanitation Authority, reported he attended the Board of Supervisors meeting on August 9 with the Sanitation Authority's Engineer/Director, Mr. H. Wellington Jones, and the Sanitation Authority's Chairman, Mr. Anderson. Mr. Miller said that Mr. Jones and Mr. Anderson gave an outstanding and professional presentation on the current water situation and forecast through 2025. Mr. Miller said that the prediction for water availability is very good. Mr. Miller continued, stating that at the Authority's meeting on August 15, 2000, a decision was made on the advice of counsel, not to put in writing the fact that if the Authority causes a well to go bad, that they will correct the situation. PUBLIC MEETING Master Development Plan #05-00 of the TREX Center, submitted by Space, L.L.C., to develop a 9.7 -acre area for the purpose of establishing an office park and commercial center. This property is located at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Rt. 522) and Fox Drive (Rt. 739) and is identified with P.I.N. 42 -A -198G in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, read the background information and review agency comments. Mr. Wyatt said that VDOT has recognized an opportunity that may exist on the northern portion of this site for access to this property internally, from Route 522. This would potentially allow for access at a signalized intersection with Fox Drive. Mr. Wyatt continued, stating that the proposed master development plan conforms to the interchange business area concept that is described within the Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Policy Plan, as well as to the statement of intent for uses within the B2 (Business General) section of the Zoning Ordinance. He said that the master development plan design will also mitigate traffic impacts to North Frederick Pike by facilitating internal traffic movement between uses. He recommended that the applicant work with the adjoining landowners to the west to determine if improvements can be made which would facilitate traffic movement to the signalized intersection at North Frederick Pike and Fox Drive. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of August 16, 2000 Page 541 -3 - Mr. Wyatt added that Mr. John Lewis and Mr. Ty Lawson, who were both representing the applicant, were available to answer questions from the Commission. Mr. John Lewis of Painter -Lewis, P.L.C., the design/engineering firm representing the applicant, came forward to answer questions from the Commission. A member ofthe Commission asked Mr. Lewis if there had been any contact with adjoining property owners to explore the possibility of constructing the entrance at the signal. Mr. Lewis replied that a meeting was held with the adjacent property owner, Long Rural International, Ltd. Partnership, concerning joint use ofthe access point. Mr. Lewis said that Long Rural International, Ltd. is currently considering the proposal and his client, TREX Center, is willing to participate in the construction of that access. There were no public comments. Mr. Miller moved for approval of the master plan with the stipulation that the applicant continue negotiations with the adjoining property owner in attempt to bring to Tuition the additional entrance into the property at the signalized intersection at North Frederick Pike and Fox Drive. This motion was seconded by Mr. Ours and unanimously approved. BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Master Development Plan #05-00 of TREX Center, submitted by Space, L.L.C., to develop a 9.7 - acre area for the purpose of establishing an office park and commercial center at the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Rt. 522) and Fox Drive (Rt. 739) with the stipulation that the applicant continue negotiations with the adjoining property owner in an attempt to bring about fruition of the additional entrance into the property at the signalized intersection at North Frederick Pike and Fox Drive. (Note: Mr. John Light abstained from voting on this item.) REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF THE ZONING DISTRICT BUFFER REQUIREMENTS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, SECTION 165-37.D BY GARBER ICE CREAM Action - Approved Ms. Amy M. Lohr, Planner II, stated that the Planning Commission has received a request from Greenway Engineering on behalf of Garber Ice Cream Company to permit a waiver of the zoning district buffer requirement ofthe Zoning Ordinance. She said that the subject parcel is currently zoned B2 (Business General) and the adjoining parcel to the south is zoned M2 (Industrial General); consequently, a Category A buffer is required by the Zoning Ordinance. Ms. Lohr explained that Category A buffers do not require a screening element, however, active and inactive buffer areas totaling 50 feet are required. She said that the proposed warehouse addition to the existing facility extends to within five feet of the shared property line between the differently -zoned parcels and the required 50 -foot distance buffer is not accomplished. Ms. Lohr stated that the Planning Commission will need to make a determination if the waiver of the zoning district buffer requirement is acceptable. A member of the Commission asked if the expansion of a legal nonconforming use was possible without a rezoning. Staff noted that the ordinance contains an expansion provision for legal, Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of August 16, 2000 Page 542 -4 - nonconforming uses of up to 50%. The Garber Ice Cream facility, a legal nonconforming use, would not require a rezoning because their proposed expansion is less than 50%. Another question asked was whether the Fire & Rescue Service had reviewed the waiver request and if issues were raised regarding access to the rear of the building. Ms. Lohr said that Fire and Rescue is currently reviewing the site plan for the expansion and this issue would need to be addressed at the site planning stage. Mr. Jason Thomas with Greenway Engineering, Inc., the design/engineering firm representing the applicant, came forward to answer questions from the Commission. A member of the Commission asked if the applicant had contacted the adjoining property owner, American Freightways, to determine if they had any objections. Mr. Thomas replied that they had not contacted the adjoining property owner. Another question raised by a Commission member was whether or not the applicant could accomplish what he needed by extending the addition towards the property line only as far as a previously extended portion of the building. Mr. Thomas said that because of the layout in the proposed building, they will need all the additional space proposed for the project to work. There were no public comments. Mr. Miller said that he did not foresee the trucking company having any objections to this expansion. He said that the Garber's Ice Cream facility has existed at this location long before the County had zoning. He believed the waiver would be appropriate in this situation and was comfortable that any issues raised could be addressed at the site plan stage. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Wilson, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously approve the request of Garber Ice Cream Company for a waiver of the Zoning District Buffer requirement of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 165-37.D. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE UPDATE OF THE 2000 COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, stated that the purpose of the discussion was to have an opportunity at the Commission level to understand the proposed updates being recommended by the CPPS (Comprehensive Plans & Programs Subcommittee) for the update of the 2000 Comprehensive Policy Plan. Mr. Wyatt said that the four main subheadings to be examined are: A) the Northeast Land Use Plan; B) the Frederick County Sanitation Authority's Long -Range Water Facilities Plan; C) the Frederick County Fire & Rescue Department's New Station Plans; and, D) Modifications to Existing Language as Proposed by Various Agencies. In addition, Mr. Wyatt introduced the Sanitation Authority's Director/Engineer, Mr. H. Wellington Jones, and the Director of Fire & Rescue Services, Mr. Gary A. DuBrueler, should the Commission have specific questions about those two areas of discussion. Mr. Wyatt next proceeded to discuss each of the four sections with the Commission. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of August 16, 2000 Page 543 15.2 A question was raised by a Commissioner regarding a statement within the plan referring to package treatment plants and the fact that they should be dedicated to a public authority or a sanitary district. The specific question was if a private individual installed a package treatment plant, could it be dedicated to the Sanitary District. Mr. Wyatt said that he interpreted that statement to mean that a Sanitary District would have the ability to use a package plant to provide service to customers within their service area. Another question raised concerned the comparison between the number of water and sewer connections and the number of residential building permits issued. Mr. Wyatt gave an estimate of the number of building permits issued and the number of new residential water and sewer connections. He said that this supports the trend identified by the Planning Department, which is that one out of every three new residential dwelling units is being built outside of the County's Urban Development Area. Mr. Wellington Jones, the Engineer/Director ofthe Sanitation Authority, addressed a question from the Commission concerning a previous statement he had made that sewer facilities were more of a problem than providing water within the Northeast Land Use Study Area. Mr. Jones said that sewer was the biggest problem because of the expense of providing central sewage facilities and the proximity of those facilities to the study area. plans. Mr. Gary A. DuBrueler, Director of Fire & Rescue Services, spoke briefly about new station Chairman DeHaven called for public comments, however, no one was present to speak. Mr. Wyatt stated that the CPPS considered all four of the proposed sections at their meeting on Monday evening, August 14, 2000, and each section received unanimous approval by the CPPS as presented. Mr. Wyatt believed that the next available date this could go to public hearing was September 6, 2000. The consensus ofthe Planning Commission was that the proposed 2000 Comprehensive Policy Plan was an excellent document and it was ready to be advertised for public hearing. ADJOURNMENT unanimous vote. No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. by Respectfully submitted, Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of August 16, 2000 Page 544 MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on September 6, 2000. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; John R. Marker, Vice -Chairman, Back Creek District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; W. Wayne Miller, Gainesboro District; Roger L. Thomas, Opequon District; John H. Light, Stonewall District; Gene E. Fisher, Citizen at Large; Sidney A. Reyes, Board Liaison; Vincent DiBenedetto, Winchester City Liaison; and Jay Cook, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: S. Blaine Wilson, Shawnee District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; and Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District STAFF PRESENT: Kris C. Tierney, Secretary; Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director; Amy M. Lohr, Planner H; Howard R. Long, III, Planner I; Jeremy F. Camp, Planner I; and Carol I. Huff, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COMMITTEE REPORTS Transportation Committee - 09/05/00 Mtg. Mr. George J. Kriz reported that the Transportation Committee held a public meeting on the Frederick County Secondary Road Improvement Plan. The Committee unanimously approved the plan and, in addition, the Committee added two roads at the airport on the list of unscheduled road improvement projects. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 545 &a Economic Development Commission (EDC) - 09/01/00 Mtg. Mr. Roger Thomas reported that the EDC discussed the work plan for the year and the improvements that have been made to the EDC's web site. PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit #11-00 of Anthony D. Overbaugh for a Cottage Occupation to construct tree stands. This property is located at 140 Theodore Drive and is identified with P.I.N. 51-20-6-31 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions Mr. Howard R. Long, I1I, Planner I, read the background information and review agency comments. Mr. Long stated that the permit will allow for the operation of a tree stand constructing business within an existing outbuilding. He said that adjoining properties appear to be adequately separated from the location of the proposed use and mature vegetation surrounding the premises serves as an adequate screen. He added that there will be no retail sales on the site. Mr. Long stated that staff believed the use would be appropriate with the conditions recommended by the staff. Mr. Anthony D. Overbaugh was present to answer questions from the Commission. Mr. Miller inquired if the tree stands would be constructed of metal or wood. Mr. Overbaugh replied that they were constructed of aluminum. Mr. Thomas asked Mr. Overbaugh if he understood that retail sales at the site were prohibited. Mr. Overbaugh had no problems with this arrangement and stated that he would sell the tree stands through local sporting goods shops. Chairman DeHaven asked the applicant if he was comfortable with all of the conditions as stated and Mr. Overbaugh replied that he was. There were no citizen comments. x6ed on the limited scale of the proposed use, the Planning Commission believed the business could operate without significant impact on the adjoining properties. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit # 11-00 of Anthony D. Overbaugh for a Cottage Occupation to construct tree stands with the following conditions: 1) All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2) In accordance with Cottage Occupation sign requirements, signage for the proposed use may not exceed four (4) square feet in area. 3) All activity associated with the Cottage Occupation shall occur inside a completely enclosed structure. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 546 IRIS 4) No additional employees shall be permitted. 5) No retail sales shall occur on the site. 6) Any change of use or expansion of the approved Cottage Occupation shall require a new Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit #12-00 of Madison Lodge #6 for a fraternal lodge in an RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. This property is located on Martinsburg Pike (Rt. 11) North of Winchester, across from the Stonewall Elementary School and is identified with P.I.N. 44-A-83 in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions Mr. Jeremy F. Camp, Planner I, read the background information and stated that no negative comments were received from any of the reviewing agencies. Mr. Camp said that nationally chartered fraternal lodges ar-- only permitted in the RA Zoning District with a conditional use permit. He stated that the proposal is to construct a.2,'_00 square foot fraternal lodge on a five -acre lot; he said that the size of the lodge should not adversely affect the residential/ rural character ofthe neighborhood. Mr. Camp continued, stating that staff has recognized three issues of concern, which were the occasional increase in traffic associated with lodge meetings and activities, the possible visual impacts of a large sign, and desire for the submittal of a site plan to avoid future potential problems associated with the construction of the lodge. Mr. Camp read the list of recommended conditions for approval of the permit. Mr. Darren Foltz of Greenway Engineering, was present to represent the applicant. Commissioners asked what type of activities would be conducted at the lodge. Mr. Foltz said that meetings will be held at the lodge twice a month; there are five active members and 15 members on the books; a grounds- keeper will be residing on the premises; they will have 11-12 parking spaces available and expect 20-30 vehicle trips per month. Commissioners asked if social functions would be conducted at this location. Mr. Foltz said that the building will not be rented to outsiders for social functions. Commissioners asked if outdoor activity areas are planned, such as softball fields. Mr. Foltz replied that other than horseshoe pits, no other outdoor activity areas are planned. Chairman DeHaven inquired as to why the applicant did not pursue a rezoning instead of a conditional use permit, due to the amount of money being invested in the construction of the building. Mr. Foltz replied &at the building will be residential in nature and he believed the adjoining property owners would not want to see this property rezoned to business. Mr. Kris C. Tierney, Planning Director, stated that given the nature of the use and the location, the Commission may want to consider requiring business standards on the site plan in terms of the parking facility and perhaps a buffer towards the adjoining residential properties. Mr. Jack Roberts, the Noble Grand of Madison Lodge #6, came forward to answer questions from the Commission. Mr. Roberts stated that all social activities and regular meetings will occur inside the Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 547 lodge itself. -4 - Chairman DeHaven called for public comments, but no one came forward to speak. Mr. Thomas stated that he would not be in favor of requiring a conditional use in a rural area to meet the standpvis of a business because of the very limited nature of the operation. Mr. Thomas believed that if the building and lot were made to conform to business standards, its visual appearance would be quite obvious in a residential neighborhood. Based on the limited scale of the proposed use, the Commission believed the lodge could operate without significant impact on the adjoining residential properties. Upon motion made by Mr. Light and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit # 12-00 of Madison Lodge #6 for a fraternal lodge in an RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with the following conditions: 1) All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2) A site plan, prepared by a certified engineer, will be submitted and approved before an occupancy permit is issued. 3) The size of any future sign on the lot shall be limited to 50 square feet. 4) This Conditional Use Permit will only apply to the approved five -acre plat, which will be given a property identification number when recorded. 5) Any expansion or change of use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Conditional Use Permit #13-00 of Donna Marie Fowler for a Cottage Occupation for an office. This property is located at 111 Front Drive and is identified with P.I.N. 64B4-2 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions Ms. Amy M. Lohr, Planner H, read the background information and review agency comments. Ms. Lohr stated that the Cottage Occupation would allow the applicant to prepare paperwork in association with her business, Fowler Homes. She said that the existing outbuilding, which the applicant plans to remodel, is located to the rear of the home and is separated by an asphalt drive. Occasionally, customers would visit the proposed office in conjunction with the purchase of a home. Ms. Lohr said the applicant has stated that the office would be open from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and would be by appointment only. She added that the existing driveway appears to be adequate to accommodate one or two vehicles in association with the office use. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 548 -5 - Ms. Donna Marie Fowler, the applicant and property owner, was available to answer questions from the Commission. There were no citizen comments. Based on the limited scale of the proposed operation, the Planning Commission believed the business could operate without significant impact on the adjoining properties. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Kriz, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit #13-00 Donna Marie Fowler for a Cottage Occupation for an office at 111 Front Drive in tine Shawnee Magisterial District with the following conditions: 1) All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2) In accordance with Cottage Occupation sign requirements, signage for the proposed use may not exceed four square feet in area. 3) All activity associated with the Cottage Occupation shall be accomplished inside a completely enclosed structure. 4) Any change of use or expansion of the approved Cottage Occupation shall require a new conditional use permit. Conditional Use Permit #14-00 of Diana Anwar to operate a bed and breakfast at 197 Carson Lane. This property is identified with P.I.N. 84-A-47 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions Ms. Amy M. Lohr, Planner II, read the background information and review agency comments. Ms. Lohr explained that the proposed bed and breakfast operation will take place in the existing home. She said that since the scale of the proposed use is more intense than is generally associated with a single-family dwelling unit, it is appropriate to consider this bed and breakfast as a Cottage Occupation. Ms. Lohr said that the applicant has stated that two or three bedrooms would be rented in association with the operation. She said that the Health Department has specified that only one bedroom shall be utilized for the business due to the limited capacity of the existing drainfield. Ms. Lohr said that the applicant is working to expand the existing drainfield in an effort to accommodate more guests. She commented that Conditional Use Permits for comparable bed and breakfast operations of this scale have been limited to three bedrooms. Ms. Lohr continued, stating that the dwelling in which the business will occur is situated on six acres of land and is approximately 200 feet from the Carson Lane right-of-way. She noted that the proposed use is consistent with the surrounding land uses. Ms. Lohr next read the stars recommended conditions for approval of the Conditional Use Permit. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 549 9M, Ms_ Diana Anwar, the property owner and applicant, was available to answer questions from the Commission. Ms. Anwar stated that she was aware of all the conditions of the permit and was comfortable with them. Commissioner George I Kriz asked the applicant if she was aware that when more than six non -family members served in the home, an industrial kitchen is required. Ms. Anwar said that she planned to serve only continental breakfasts. There were no public comments. The Planning Commission believed that the proposed use would not impact the existing community in a negative manner, if the applicant complied with all of the review agency comments. Upon motion made by Mr. Marker and seconded by Mr. Miller, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit # 14-00 of Diana Anwar for a Cottage Occupation for a bed and breakfast at 197 Carson Lane with the following conditions: 1) All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2) In accordance with Cottage Occupation sign requirements, signage for the proposed use may not exceed four square feet in area. 3) No more than one bedroom shall be utilized for the bed and breakfast operation, unless otherwise permitted by the Winchester -Frederick County Health Department. 4) Should the Health Department allow additional bedrooms, the total number of bedrooms shall not exceed three. 5) Any expansion of the bed and breakfast beyond three bedrooms shall require a new conditional use permit. Conditional Use Permit #15-00 of Dr. Trevor Collins for a veterinary clinic at 6925 Valley Pike. This property is identified with P.I.N. 84-A-82 in the Opequon Magisterial District. Action - Recommended Approval with Conditions Ms. Amy M. Lohr, Planner Il, read the background information and review agency comments. Ms. Lohr pointed out that the fire marshal has recommended approval, but has specified the need for a defined parking area to provide for an unobstructed emergency vehicle access. She explained that the applicant intends to run the business from a currently unoccupied structure, providing consultation and surgery services. She said that the applicant has stated that the bulk of the veterinary practice will continue to be conducted away from the office. She added that the applicant has stated that there is no intention of offering non-medical boarding or proprietary medical sales. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 550 -7 - Ms. Lohr continued, stating that there is a need for defined parking area, as well as upgrades to the existing entrance; it may be appropriate to require a minor site plan as a condition of this application. She said that in addition, it may be advisable to limit proposed signage. Ms. Lohr next read the staff s recommended conditions for approval. Mr. Thomas inquired about the appropriateness of requiring a sixth condition, which would prohibit the boarding of non-medical animals at the facility. Dr. Trevor J. Collins, the applicant, stated that he would not have a problem with adding a sixth condition, as stated by Mr. Thomas. In response to Mr. Reyes' question regarding elimination of animal wastes, Dr. Collins stated that he will be required to install a separate septic system. Dr. Collins said that most of the business he will be conducting is over the phone and not in the clinic. Dr. Collins inquired of the Commission if there really was a need for a minor site plan when he would not be increasing the size ofthe existing structure; in addition, he was concerned about Condition 44 which stated that, "All activity associated with the business shall be accomplished inside the existing building." Dr. Collins said that if a client brings a cow or horse in a trailer, he would need to be able to take care of that animal outside, or be able to walk a large animal outside after it has been treated. Commission members believed that Condition #4 would not restrict this type of activity for Dr. Collins. It was also noted that the Health Department has required the removal/disconnection from septic of the existing mobile home and the applicant has agreed to see that this is carried out. Chairman Del-laven called for public comments and the following person came forward to speak: Ms. Paula A. Nelson, adjoining property owner on both the north and east sides, requested that the existing tree line between the south side of her property and the north side of this property be left intact. Dr. Collins said that he would be willing to keep the tree line intact. Based on the scale of the proposed operation and the history of commercial uses on this site, the Commission was of the belief that this veterinary clinic could operate without significant impact on the adjoining properties, provided that all of the conditions of the permit were met. Upon motion made by Mr. Thomas and seconded by Mr. Fisher, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit # 15-00 of Dr. Trevor Collins for a veterinary clinic at 6925 Valley Pike with the following conditions: 1) All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times. 2) Approval of this conditional use shall require a minor site plan. 3) Sign for the proposed use shall not exceed 50 square feet in area. 4) No overnight boarding of animals for non-medical purposes, nor outdoor kennels or dog runs shall be permitted. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 551 -8- 5) Any change of use or expansion of the approved veterinary clinic shall require a new conditional use permit. PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE UPDATE OF THE 2000 COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN FOR FREDERICK COUNTY Action - Recommended Approval Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Planning Director, stated that during the Planning Commission's previous meeting, a detailed discussion took place on the proposed amendments to the 2000 Comprehensive Policy Plan for Frederick County. He said that the Planning Commission had no additions or revisions to the information presented by the staff. Mr. Wyatt next proceeded to summarize the amendments for the Commission. There were no public comments. No questions or issues were raised by the Commission. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Thomas, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval and adoption ofthe Update ofthe 2000 Comprehensive Policy Plan for Frederick County as presented by the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee and the planning staff. DISCUSSION ITEM: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE B2 (BUSINESS GENERAL) PERMITTED USE LIST No Action Required Ms. Amy M. Lohr, Planner II, stated that the staff has received a request from Greenway Engineering to consider an amendment to the permitted use list of the B2 (Business General) Zoning District to include all uses in Major Group 79—Amusement and Recreation Services. Ms. Lohr explained that, specifically, they are interested in enabling activities such as swimming pools and court games to be located outdoors. Ms. Lohr stated that the Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) considered this request at their meeting of July 27, 2000 and the general consensus of the members was that outdoor recreation was highly appropriate in the B2 District. She stated that in addition, the committee believed that outdoor recreation facilities were desirable and beneficial to those persons already engaged in commercial activities in the B2 District. Ms. Lohr continued, stating that the DRRS also examined other uses Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 552 WE permitted by Major Group 79 and were of the opinion that while the inclusion of many of the uses within this group may be appropriate within the B2 District, several of the uses would warrant, at a minimum, additional performance standards to ensure their compatibility with the district and surrounding properties. Ms. Lohr next read the DRRS's recommendation for defining the proposed use and allowing it as a permitted use in the B2 District. She added that rather than permitting the entire use group, the DRRS believed that defining and allowing the specific use would be more appropriate. She said that this avoids opening up the district to many significant uses and provides certainty to the County in the type of uses that would be permitted. The Planning Commission believed the amendment as presented was appropriate and directed the staff to proceed with public hearing arrangements for the first available meeting. OTHER Mr. Kris C. Tierney, Director, stated that there are no pending applications or items for business for the Commission's September 20, 2000 meeting. Mr. Tierney said that he has a proposal, however, from the Dogwood Development Group, in arranging a bus tour on the evening of September 20, to a housing project in northern Virginia which is similar to their proposal for the Wheatlands site. Upon motion made by Mr. Miller and seconded by Mr. Kriz, the Planning Commission unanimously voted to cancel their meeting of September 20, 2000. Chairman DeHaven said that if any of the Commissioners were interested in participating in this tour to let the staff know so that the proper arrangements could be made. ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. by unanimous vote. Respectfully submitted, Kris C. Tierney, Planning Director Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of September 6, 2000 Page 553 PC REVIEW: 10/04/00 BOS REVIEW: 10/25/00 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #16-00 JAMES E. SMELSER Shale Mining Operation with Sales LOCATION: This property is located at 1557 Green Spring Road. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 21-A-27 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned RA (Rural Areas) District; Land Use: Residential and vacant PROPOSED USE: Shale Mining Operation with Sales REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: No objection to conditional use permit for this property. However, prior to operation of the business, a commercial entrance must be constructed to our minimum standards to allow for safe egress and ingress of the property. Any work performed on the State rights-of-way must be covered by a land use permit. The permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety bond coverage. Inspections Department: No structures involved; no comment required. Fire Marshal: Plan approval is recommended; no additional comments. Health Department: No objection to this proposal so long as the existing sewage disposal system for the residence is not disturbed. James E. Smelser CUP Page 2 September 22, 2000 Planning and Zoning: The Zoning Ordinance allows for the mining of shale in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit. The applicant proposes to mine approximately 20 acres of his 100 -acre parcel in coordination with the mining operation. The subject parcel is divided by Green Spring Road. The applicant's home lies on the west side of the roadway. The proposed shale mining would occur on the east side, directly across from the home. Through a contract with the Virginia Department of Transportation, some excavation has already occurred on-site. This excavation was conducted within 100 feet of Green Spring Road. In accordance with County regulations, subsequent mining must occur at least 100 feet from the roadway. There are three homes on Evening Lane which abut the parcel where the mining would occur. These properties, however, are screened by evergreen vegetation. Given the 100 foot side and rear yard setback for excavation and the natural buffer, these properties should not be negatively impacted. Private operations ofthis nature are monitored and licensed by the Division of Mineral Mining (DMM), part of the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy. The applicant is aware of the state permitting procedure and has been in contact with David Cress, the mining inspector for our area. Before a permit can be issued, the applicant must provide DMM with suitable operations, drainage, and reclamation plans. The applicant plans to sell shale to individual homeowners, as well as small companies. As a result, considerable heavy truck traffic would be unlikely. Typically, a pick-up or small dump truck would be used to haul shale away from the site. Staff would recommend limiting the operating hours from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday. The Planning Commission has the authority to require appropriate landscaping or screening within any required yard setback area in order to reasonably protect adjacent uses from noise, sight, dust or other adverse impacts. A site plan is required for all development in the EM (Extractive Manufacturing) Zoning District and all mining operations in the RA (Rural Areas) District must meet all regulations set forth in the regulations for the EM district. However, the applicant does not propose to construct any new buildings in coordination with this CUP. The State permitting procedure may be sufficient to ensure that the site is adequately developed and maintained. Staff would seek the guidance of the planning commission with regard to the necessity of a site plan. James E. Smelser CUP Page 3 September 22, 2000 STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 10-04-00 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Approval of this conditional use permit may be appropriate with the following conditions: All review agency comments and Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. A state mining permit shall be obtained and kept current as required by the Code of Virginia. 3. No commercial mining operation shall occur until an approved VDOT entrance is constructed. 4. Hours of operation shall be 8 a.m. to 6 p.m., Monday through Saturday. 0 W gendas\COMMENTS\CUP's\2000\Smelser.wpd CONDITIONAL IISEPERMIT -0 Submittal Deadline -00 P/C Meeting 0-4-00 BOS Meeting l0 -? SOfl APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the V' owner other) NAME: Ca M es L' S 09 -e S -e- f2 ADDRESS: TELEPHONE co q (c 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: e r -n-) Cc Srkl us -e �� ayp 3. The property is located at: include the route number of your a I- 6 (please give exact directions and road or street) 7a i- '_ Aw 1e Inc e- 12� A q 2 `4.' The property has a road frontage of ! feet and a depth of ;: .� feet and consists of iO 7 acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by Jcirc-es L S'Y-h-j5-2-4 as evidenced by deed from -.P-ct .5ry-),eI 2 recorded ("U1 j I (previous owner) 6. in -domed book no. — _ on page / ,_-I as recorded in the records of the1C erk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 14 -Digit Property Identification No. Magisterial District Current Zoning R A 7. Adjoining Property: ZONING DECEIVE® 1 iz/ cEP 0 6 200[ DEPT, OF PIANNING(DEVELOPMENT; USE North re 51 6 er-1' eo East s, �-e v-il &A South ; JC -V-1-1'' C- I West ZONING DECEIVE® 1 iz/ cEP 0 6 200[ DEPT, OF PIANNING(DEVELOPMENT; 8. The,type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: �` N (1) /�/ 2 r� r �G�' 1�7 5. 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: /11 NAME .bt(GhiC. /V1aMADDRESS 8704 GraP-N-5 d -e- r, PROPERTY ID# a 1 - l�} -32 an g 11"ILY ' "I el /-tD ouvoc(-o � NAME S+0.n(� C. Zuc.ke.rr-n&J1-4a.PJ ADDRESS JI a3''1 ®o-UcqL) PROPERTY ID# NAME �T t� �hJC ADDRESS Sttr1�5 Ci Ua �0 5S PROPERTY IDI--?] - % NAME POJC�,k ADDRESS 1:11CO UJ IV-- .Spi-aoC, 2S_ PROPERTY ID# NAME IC �� SYyS�P� ADDRESS 1-7 1(s C f U - (,� t o ckes IJ PROPERTY ID# I ` /-T G� / y,2 NAME YV10 ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# .2 % W J - ,2 7 A aa(D 03 NAME -Fr Q r (I( � . P c,__ - ADDRESS -P, o, 8 0 JC C -AX PROPERTY ID# r /- - J 5 /A- }-�O(YtOSaSc SCL Jpr"n'T) yy NAME ,5AtA,-y) cbJ,:rh �_kt M v�`�Yy _ ADDRESS L4 S /-kA G L lJ - PROPERTY ID# a l - i? NAME �L"o— Chi ISLrS&DRESS t)-6 . c) X PROPERTY ID# I - %� oZ S r e ��5 ( vr, .! 93L& sS NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY y. NAME' ilei GhaA ill; S �[, Z� o.) ADDRESS 39 S Toc) r PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY IDI NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY IDI NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# CI J S � P DEPT, OF PU;tiNIPyG,'OEVtLUFi�ENi 12. Additional comments, if any: I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Signature of Owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. 57 (rre.eA - 6 a- 007(, TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: a -� STONE PILE ` 20 05-379 AC . opo - wooDs CABIN i �n - .?O e _ U N lr M /VA in _ o y O �'F a J RAR dl;- W 'q ?2 �EV689 CF IPS OLO 24 9C J j gOAO Q, l oda ar /VAN ` ya -q ' .3 O.@ 6 -97 -✓Ac m = J 3 Rq/AG- P KSO ni .� Q 2q. ry 22�'A-Zq 41.) N ¢ 4� —k�v° 25�III In ai a 1 1„ 26i I W /2 qi 27- Q 11 28- w /LPS. a III � 29. W / .Ip W W 30. [,� z b-' �� f.- to �I.PS. �p�� '"j ``�` �o.trm �_/ � Q• J , N s / Aq SFO•. A� zmQ ✓qM 6' rpgRcFC RAf�T�SMf 5a / 16. =- MAG. X94 - This line subject Z 0 400 800 1200 to ag:'eement with Smelser. n1271 I.OT OMSOLIDATION of the land of FRANCIS M. BAYLISS ESTATE Gainesboro District, Frederick County, Virginia Scale 1" = 400' January 31, 1995 "lk,4.q/VD SURW��p„% COUNTY of FREDERICK - Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 41EA_f_ nl?-41VDUM To: Frederick County Planning Commission From: Amy M. Lohr, Planner II, Subject: Public Hearing - Proposed Amendment for Commercial Sport and Recreation Clubs in the B2 (General Business) District Date: September 19, 2000 This amendment is to allow for specific recreation activities in the B2 (Business General) Zoning District. The Development Review and Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) and Planning Commission have held discussions regarding this amendment and are comfortable with the proposed language associated with this amendment. The proposed text amendment, attached with this memorandum, pertains to allowing commercial sport and recreation clubs in the B2 (Business General) Zoning District. The amendment is a result of a request received by our department to permit Amusement and Recreation Services (SIC -Major Group 79) in the B2 District. The DRRS felt that defining and allowing a specific use was most appropriate, rather than permitting the entire use group; the Planning Commission concurred with this rationale. Defining a specific use avoids opening up the B2 District to many significant uses that are classified in Maj or Group 79. Additionally, it provides certainty to the County in the type of use that would be permitted. Staff would request that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. AML/ch Attachment U: lAmylCommoniPC MemoslCoirmercial Sport and Rec Clubs in B2.wpd 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Commercial Sport and Recreation Clubs Amendment - B2 (Business General) Zoning District 165-82.B.(1) Allowed Uses Commercial Sport and Recreation Clubs 165-145. Definitions Commercial Sport and Recreation Clubs - a public or private fee -supported recreational facility located indoors or outdoors that may include swimming pools, court games, and other similar activities. U: WmylCommonWC MemoslCommercial Sport and Ree Clubs in B2.wpd COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 MEMORANDUM To: Frederick County Planning Commission From: Amy M. Lohr, Planner II - Subject: Public Hearing: 2001- 2002 Secondary Road Improvement Plan Date: September 20, 2000 The Transportation Committee reviewed the annual update of the Secondary Road Improvement Plan at their September meeting and forwarded a recommendation of approval to the Planning Commission. As part of that approval, two new'projects were included in the unscheduled lists of both the Major Road Improvements and Hardsurface Road Improvements portions of the Plan. Under the major road improvements, the two new projects were requested by Renny Manuel, Director of the Winchester Regional Airport Authority. Improvements to Victory Road (Rt. 728), as well as the need to relocate a portion of Airport Road (Rt. 645), prompted this request. In contrast to the 2000 - 2001 plan, the major road improvement projects have been further categorized into a funded list and an unscheduled list. These two projects were placed at the bottom of the unscheduled list (for more information, please refer to the attached letter from Renny Manuel). With regard to new hardsurface road improvement projects, Ebenezer Church Road (Rt. 705) and Hollow Road (Rt. 707) qualified for inclusion in this year's plan. These roadways are ranked number 2 and 4, respectively, on the unscheduled list. The Committee made two other recommendations with regard to the Secondary Road Improvement Plan. First, the Committee suggested that the County consider the use of Revenue Sharing Funds whenever possible. Second, the Committee suggested that the Board of Supervisors consider implementing an objective rating system for unscheduled Major Road Improvement projects. This recommendation was made because of the large number of projects on the list and the inability to objectively determine where a new project should be placed on the list. Currently, projects are accepted in the order that they are received by the County. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Public Hearing: 2001- 2002 Secondary Road Improvement Plan Page 2 September 20, 2000 Attached with this memorandum are the draft 2001 - 2002 Secondary Road Improvement Plan, a summary of the new projects, a summary of projects funded under the 2000 - 2001 plan, maps depicting the location of new projects for major road improvements and hardsurface requests, and support information from the Winchester Regional Airport. Upon review of the plan update, staff would request that the Planning Commission forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. AML/ch Attachment U. IAmylCommon PC Memos12001_2002 Secondary Road Imp Plan.wpd DRAFT FREDERICK COUNTY SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN MAJOR PROJECTS/ NEW HARD SURFACE/ INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION 2001 -2002 Frederick County Transportation Committee (Recommendation for approval on September 5, 2000) Frederick County Planning Commission (Recommendation for approval on 2000) Adopted on , 2000 by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2001/2002 Major road improvement projects command the reconstruction of hardsurfaced roads to enhance puhlic safety. Improvements required for road width, road alignment, road strength, and road gradient are considered major road improvements projects. * To be constructed as one project Page 1 of 6 RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2000 WT. OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT y LL. t• W_ C txt t!JF- Ck' LLJ CJ tJ l LU Q UJI 1) 656 Route 657 Route 659 4237 1.01 miles SH/ST 8,200,000 Under Const. 2) 647 Route 277 Route 642 7241 2.08 miles OP 5,400,000 12/03 3) 669 Structure #6165 over 1-81 2,401 ST 400,000 07/03 P.E. only —RNV & Const. Funds by other programs 719, Route 277 Route 642 n/a 1.55 miles OP Revenue Sharing 03101 Warrior Dr. Fund 5) 656" Route 657 Route 655 2,934 1.36 miles SH 7,072,000 UN/SH 6)L 655* Route 656 Route 50 4,282 0.78 miles SH 5,056,000 UN/SH * To be constructed as one project Page 1 of 6 RECEIVED SEP 0 8 2000 WT. OF PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT UNSCHEDULED MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2001/2002 v `Z 0 z' 608 Route 50 West Route 616 1527 2.83 miles BC 659 Route 820 Route 7 401 0.2 mile ST Towns curb and gutter improvements for the Town of Stephens City Towns curb and gutter improvements for the Town of Middletown 664 Route 761 Route 660 1898 1.1 miles ST 660 Route 664 Route 7 East 1268 2.13 miles ST 622 Winch. City Limits Route 37 9192 1.03 miles BC 600 1.07 Mi. N Rte. 679 Route 684 942 1.93 miles GA 659 Route 656 Route 820 401 1.8 miles ST 657 Winch. City Limits Route 656 9197 1.6 miles SH 739 Route 673 Route 522 North 2763 1.66 miles GA 636 Route 277 Route 642 874 1.6 miles OP/SH 644 Winch. City Limits Route 522 South 4835 1.36 miles SH 661 Route 11 North Route 660 397 3.24 miles ST 622 Route 629 Route 37 3211 5.86 miles BC 657 Route 656 Clarke Co. Line 4779 2.07 miles ST 641 Route 647 Route 277 2980 0.68 mile OP 761 Route 11 North Route 664 2239 1.13 miles ST 659 Route 7 Route 656 4524 1.09 miles SH/ST 636 Route 277 1.5 Mi. S. Rte. 277 522 1.5 miles OP 621 Route 1109 Route 628 1080 0.57 mile BC 600 Route 753 Route 614 2075 1.8 miles BC 642 0.2 Mi. W. Rte1070 Route 1031 8046 0.9 mile OP/SH 661 Route 663 Route 11 North 7729 1.21 miles ST/GA 628 Route 621 Winch. City Limits 2722 1.25 miles BC 627 Interstate 81 Route 11 South 5187 0.49 mile OP 704 Route 751 Route 683 282 4.11 miles BC 645 Route 990 Route 728 1494 .60 miles SH 728 Route 645 Route 50 1438 .80 miles SH The order of unscheduled major road improvement projects was established based on the year that the specific project request was received by Frederick County. This order will be maintained until an objective rating system is approved by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors Page 2 of 6 HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2001%2002 Hardsurface road improvement projects provide impervious resurfacing and reconstruction of non- hardsurfaced secondary roads. Hardsurface improvement projects are prioritized by an objective rating system which considers average daily traffic volumes; occupied structures; physical road conditions including geometrics, drainage, and accident reports; school bus routing; and the time that project requests have been on the Secondary Road Improvement Plan. Page 3 of 6 LU 1UU- e UJIrLLI Z Z 0 0 = < � W - d0) l �>- W 633 Route 625 Route 11 South "91 1.4 miles OP/B C 726,831 11/00 2) 629 0.27 Mi. E. Rt. 622 1.15 Mi. E. Rte. 622 98 1.05 miles BC 724,454 12/01 3) 689 S. Int. Rt. 600 N. Int. Rt. 600 63 4.20 miles GA 2,457,000 07/04 4) 704 1 Rt. 683 W. VA Line 174 3.30 miles BC 2,600,000 UN/SH Page 3 of 6 UNSCHEDULED HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2001/2002 Page 4 of 6 Lu W 1. 84 1) 618 Route 622 Route 608 92 3.3 miles BC 2) 705 0.25 Mi. E. Rt. 703 Rt. 522 123 4.25 miles GA 81 3) 679 0.3 Mi. W. Rt. 608 to 0.5 Mi. E. Rt. 600 :. 586 2.5 miles GA 78 4) 707 W. VA line Rt. 610 93 1.6 miles BC 73 5) 734 1.27 Mi. SW Rt. 522 N to 2.27 Mi. SW Rt.;:. 126 1 mile GA 70 522N 6) 629 Rt. 631 Rt. 625 149 1.8 miles BC 68 7) 709 Rt 636 .. ,Rt..735_ .__ 133 2.7. miles _ . OP 68 8) 676 0.83 Mi. S. Rte. 671 to 168 0.87 mile GA 66 Route 677 9) 692 1.2 Mi. N.E. Rte. 600 to 137 1.4 miles GA 66 Route 671 10) 612 Route 600 Route 600 51 1.6 miles BC 65 11) 607 Route 600 End of State Maint. 113 0.78 mile BC 64 12) 695 2.3 miles north Rt. 522 to WV 83 0.9 miles GA 62 13) 638 Route 625 Route 759 86 0.8 mile BC 60 14) 733 Rt. 50W Rt. 707 61 1.3 miles BC 59 15) 636 Route 640 Route 641 46 1.5 miles OP 57 16) 636 Route 709 Route 735 147 1.1 miles OP 57 17) 671 Route 669 to 168 0.3 mile ST 57 West VA Line 18) 696 Route 522 North Route 694 81 1.3 miles GA 55 19) 836 Route 11 North to 75 0.8 mile ST 52 End of State Maint. 20) 644 Rt. 50E Clarke Co. 69 0.81 miles SH 49 21) 634 Route 635 Route 11 South 180 0.25 mile OP 45 22) 811 Route 671 to 137 0.25 mile ST 43 End of State Maint. Page 4 of 6 INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION 2001/2002 icidental construction projects are defined as minor construction projects that cost less than $100,000. Examples involve drainage improvements, site distance improvements, spot widening, replacing overflow pipes with box culverts, and the application of cold mix on existing road surfaces. The Virginia Department of Ir .�1culSpv1La�ivn uPcLeiinii<e� ii a proposed project C�ua1111 S TV In. In. I eruai %-UlIbUiltrL1011 udJGd on the overall scope of the improvement. �l , �y.7 wr."t K ) `"i�"+Ri,1F- � �� YI�Y•,r r. � frr .-[pit ' All i=VI!' �]�+:1r v �* F'�•Y•'L -. ' , "h , � ynti � . ' kLb W � 'i ^ 'i�'� ` d «ice «rrf' 5 k .i i! ,Y'I�•S'6,r�k'r{sa y 'i F y, r r� k #+-., 1) 600 From: 0.98 Mi. N Rte. 685 Widen slope and shoulder to improve GA 35,000 01/02 To: 1.08 Mi. N. Rte. 685 sight distance 2) 608 At 0.04 Mi. N. Rte. 616 Replace bridge. BC 100,000 01102 3) 645 From: 0.78 Mi. E. Rte. 728 Construct bridge and approaches SH 104,500 01/02 To: 0.85 Mi. E. Rte. 728 4) 660 From: Int. Rte. 661 Widen slope to improve sight distance ST 12,000 01/02 To: 0.02 Mi. N. Rte. 661 5) 671 From: 1.30 Mi. N. Rte. 690 Widen curve to improve sight distance GA 30,000 01/02 To: 1.38 Mi. N. Rte. 690 6) 672 From: 0.11 Mi. W. Rte 663 Lower vertical curve to improve sight ST 100,000 01/02 To: 0.19 Mi. W. Rte. 663 distance 7) 752 From: Int. Rte. 705 Widen to improve alignment GA 40,000 01/02 To: 0.15 Mi. S. Rte. 705 8) 803 At 0.25 Mi. SW Rte. 50 Widen box culvert and shoulders BC 20,000 01/02 9) 1160 Greenbriar Subdivision Plant mix SH 200,000 01/02 Improvements 10) 600 County Wide Improvement Install guardrail at various locations N/A 50,000 01/02 11) 672 0.05 M. W. Rt. 11 R/R Crossing -Install flashing ST 12,500 02/03 lights/Improve surface 10% Match 12) 638 0.10 M. W. Rt. 11 R/R Crossing -Install flashing lights OP 8,000 02/03 10% Match 13) 657 Widen bridge, construct tum lanes SH 50,000 02/03 Int. 779, 807 & 1201 10% Match 14) 657 Construct turn lanes SH 50,000 02/03 Int. 1265 & 1228 10% Match 15) 641 From: 0.02 Mi. N. Rt. 636E Improve drainage & widen shoulder OP 22,000 02/03 To: Rt. 636W 16) 636 From: 0.53 Mi. W Rt. 641 Widen slope OP 30,000 02103 To: 0.60 Mi. W Rt. 641 17) 631 From: 0.13 Mi, W. Rt. 629 Widen slope & shoulder OP 82,700 02/03 To: 0.27 Mi. W. Rt. 629 18) 671 From: 0.49 Mi. E Rt. 739 Widen curve GA 35,000 02/03 To: 0.54 Mi. E Rt. 739 19) 660 From: 1.00 Mi. S Rt. 664 Install guardrail ST 5,000 02/03 To: 1.04 Mi. S. Rt. 664 20) 660 From: 0.66 Mi. S Rt. 664 Install guardrail ST 8,000 02/03 To: 0.70 Mi. S Rt. 664 21) 660 From: 1.07 Mi. S Rt. 664 Install guardrail ST 10,000 02103 To: 1.11 Mi. S Rt. 664 22) 739 From: 0.38 Mi. S Rt. 672 Install guardrail both sides ST 19,000 02/03 To: 0.45 Mi. S Rt. 672 23) 739 From: 0.50 Mi. S Rt. 672 Install guardrail ST 13,000 02/03 To: 0.63 Mi. S Rt. 672 24) 654 From: 0.21 Mi. S Rt. 671 Install guardrail ST 16,000 02/03 To: 0.24 Mi. S Rt. 671 25) 705 From: 0.94 Mi. W Rt. 522 Widen Curve GA 30,000 02/03 To: 1.00 Mi. W Rt. 522 Page 5 of 6 26) 600 From: 0.05 Mi. S Rt. 608S Widen slope to improve sight distance GA 21,700 02/03 To: 0.05 Mi. N Rt. 608S 27) 600 From: 1.15 Mi. S Rt. 693 Widen slope and shoulder both sides GA 45,000 02/03 To: 1.42 Mi. S Rt. 693 28) 1049 The Pines Subdivision Plant Mix OP 76,000 02/03 Improvements 29) 1225 Frederick Heights Subdivision Plant Mix SH 92,000 02/0; Improvements 30) 867 Glenmont Village Subdivision Plant Mix SH 20,000 02/03 Improvements _ 31) 600 County -wide Improvement Install guardrail at various locations 40,000 02/03 Page 6 of 6 NEW ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS INCORPORATED INTO 2001 - 2002 SECONDARY ROAD IMPROVEMENT PLAN UPDATE MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROTECTS: Two new projects were requested for the 2001 - 2002 update. Route 645 (Airport Road) See enclosed support information. Route 728 (Victory Road) See enclosed support information. HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROTECTS: Two new projects qualified for the 2001 - 2002 update. Route 705 (Ranked # 2 on the unscheduled hard surface list). Route 707 (Ranked # 4 on the unscheduled hard surface list). 0 Route 704 has been moved to the scheduled hardsurface road improvement projects. INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION: Project # 7: Knob Road (752) - Widen to improve alignment Project # 8: Round Hill Road (803) - Widen box culvert and shoulders Project # 9: Greenbriar Subdivision (1160) - Plant mix Project # 10: County wide improvement - install guardrail Project # 11: Hopewell Road (672) - Railroad crossing; install flashing lights; improve surface Project # 12: Vaucluse Road (638) - Railroad crossing; install flashing lights Project # 13: Senseny Road (657) - Widen bridge, construct turn lanes Project # 14: Senseny Road (657) - Construct turn lanes Project # 15: Double Church Road (641) - Improve drainage and widen shoulder Project # 16: Canterburg Road (636) - Widen slope Project # 17: Marlboro Road (63 1) - Widen slope and shoulder Project # 18: White Hall Road (671) - Widen curve Project # 19: Woods Mill Road (660) - Install guardrail Project # 20: Woods Mill Road (660) - Install guardrail Project # 21: Woods Mill Road (660) - Install guardrail Project # 22: Apple Pie Ridge Road (739) 7 -Install guardrail on both sides Project # 23: Apple Pie Ridge Road (739) - Install guardrail Project # 24: Cedar Grove Road (654) - Install guardrail Project # 25: Ebenezer Church Road (705) - Widen curve Project # 26: Pifer Road North/Back Mountain Road (600) - Widen slope to improve sight distance Project # 27: Brush Creek Road (600) - Widen slope and shoulder on both sides Project # 28: The Pines Subdivision (1049) - Plant mix Project # 29: Frederick Heights Subdivision (1225) - Plant mix Project # 30: Glenmont Village Subdivision (867) - Plant mix Project # 31: County wide improvement - install guardrail ROAD 01PROVEMENT PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER 2000 - 2001 SECONDARY ROAD CONSTRUCTION BUDGET MAJOR ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: 0 Route 652 project was funded from the 2000 - 2001 Road Improvement Plan. HARDSURFACE ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS: • Route 625 project was funded from the 2000 - 2001 Road Improvement Plana INCIDENTAL CONSTRUCTION: • Merriman Lane (621) - Rubberized crossing and flashing lights • Double Church Road (641) - Realign road to south to improve sight distance • Welltown Pike (661) - Widen curve to improve sight distance • Stephenson Road (664) - Improve drainage; remove box culverts; install pipe Ruebuck Lane (670) - Install box culvert to improve drainage • Walters Mill Lane (836) - Spot widen and improve drainage • Fredericktowne Subdivision (1054) - Plant mix applied throughout subdivision as needed to improve pavement failure • Chapel Hill Road (692) - Replace Pipe; install box culvert; realign road and intersection • Brush Creek Road (600) - Spot widen to improve sight distance • Knob Road (752) - Spot widen Wardensville Grade (608) - Spot widen to improve sight distance • County wide improvement - install guardrail • Wardensville Grade (608) - Install flashing lights 4 2001-2002 Secondary Road Improvements Plan New Major Road Projects N W E S 0 3000 5000 Feet Spring Rd Primary Roads AlSecondary Roads ,IworkAreas Airport Boundary County 2001-2002 ►Secondary Road Improvements Flan New Hardsurface % Road Requests 44 4 N W E S h�ollo �d Primary Roads I\lSecondary Roads Road Work Areas o r 2 Mites = County WINCHESTER REGIONAL AIRPORT 491 AIRPORT ROAD WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22602 )))(540) 662-2422 Memorandum To: Evan Wyatt, Deputy Director— Frederick County Planning and Development From: Renny Manuel, Director, Winchester Regional Airport Authority Date: 7/26/00 Re: Secondary Road Plan — SR 645 & SR 728 I would like to request the County of Frederick consider placing Airport Road (Rt. 645) from Aviation Drive (Rt. 900) to Victory Road (Rt. 728); as well as Victory Road fro Airport Road to Millwood Pike (US Rt. 50/17) in the Secondary 'load Plan. Due to the continuing expansion of the Winchester Regional Airport and the ongoing industrial development around the Airport, truck traffic has increased dramatically. In addition, there has been an increase in vehicular traffic utilizing this section in order to avoid the Interstate 81 and Route 50 interchange. Attached is a brief summary describing the need for this road to be added to the Secondary Road Plan. Also included is the Runway 32 Protection Zone Plan and Profile detailing the section of road that penetrates into the Part 77 Surfaces. Should you require additional information or have questions, please contact my office. Thank you for your continued assistance and support. 37 t TJ L) _�� The Winchester Regional Airport Authority is seeking ways to improve road and aviation modes of transportation by combining the efforts and plans of all responsible agencies to include Local, State and Federal agencies. This would allow the efficient management of the taxpayers' funds for which we are fiscally responsible. Two factors weigh heavily on the need to improve the eastern portion of Airport Road from Kohl's Distribution Center to the Victory Road intersection. Factor one involves vehicle and truck traffic on Airport Road from Routes 522 and 50, which has steadily increased over the last twelve months. This is the result of continuing business and industrial development around the Airport and the use of Airport Road as a detour for traffic avoiding the Route 5011nterstate 81 intersection. Airport Road from Kohl's distribution center running east to Victory Road is a narrow rural road with no designated turning lanes for the businesses that are continuing to build in that area. Ruts visible at the intersection of Airport Road and Victory Road, suggest a need for improvement to accommodate the increasing truck traffic. Eventually Airport Road will need improvements and repairs to the existing road and intersection. The second factor involves the Airport. In 1993, the Airport Authority adopted a twenty-year Master Plan developed to meet the FAA's, safety and design standards to provide this region a safe and efficient air transportation facility. To date, the Federal Aviation Administration, the Virginia Department of Aviation, and the five surrounding jurisdictions have invested more than $14 million into this facility to make these vital improvements. The last major project needed to meet these requirements is to move a section of Airport Road from the AES Company to the Victory Road intersection. Passing under the Runway Protection Zone, surveys have identified part of SR645 as an obstruction to the approach surface for Runway 32 based on the FAA standard 15 -foot clearance for a road. The FAA requires this zone to ensure a safe and clear approach surface for landing aircraft. Enclosed is a layout of the Airport with detail of this area to help you have a better understanding of the need to relocate this section of road. The Airport Authority has completed the purchase of more than $1.2 million dollars of land to move forward with the road relocation effort. To provide VDOT with a 100 -foot easement for this project, the Authority, FAA, VDOA and local jurisdictions, used funds to acquire the additional land needed. Because only a portion of the road is considered an obstruction into the Part 77 surfaces, only a fraction of the estimated cost would be eligible for funding through the FAA and VDOA. Available funding sources accessible by the Airport are limited therefore the Authority is seeking financial assistance from other sources to share in the funding of this major transportation project. Completion of this project enhances the Airport, improves intra -modal transportation needs and meets the requirements established by the FAA for a safe and efficient air transportation facility that is part of the National Airport System. COUNT`' of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540i665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director � 1 RE: Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) Expansion Request from Investment Land Trust DATE: September 21, 2000 Included within this agenda item is information that has been prepared by Triad Engineering, agent for Investment Land Trust. Investment Land Trust has requested to expand the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to incorporate eight acres of a 50.786 -acre parcel that is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Fairfax Pike (Route 277) and White Oak Road (Route 636). This parcel is identified as Tax Map 86-A-156 and is zoned RA, Rural Areas District. The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) considered this request during the November 8, 1999 meeting. During that meeting, members of the CPPS inquired about the proposed improvements to Fairfax Pike, the impacts to the existing sewer facilities within the area, and the potential of having the entire acreage interpreted as being within the SWSA if the eight acres was incorporated. The CPPS directed the applicant to provide additional information regarding these inquiries, and expressed a preference to have the desired eight acres subdivided from the 50.786 -acre parcel prior to final action. The applicant obtained additional information from the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA), and presented the request to the CPPS during their meeting of September 11, 2000. The applicant advised the CPPS that the desired 8 -acre portion of this parcel could not be legally subdivided because an approved health system could not be obtained on the property. The applicant presented a plan for the proposed improvements to this intersection that was obtained from VDOT, and advised the committee that the FCSA has a sewer force main with a three-inch line that comes from the Fulton property and adjoins this parcel. The applicant felt that this facility could serve the 8 -acres desired to be incorporated into the SWSA. The CPPS felt that it was inappropriate to incorporate the 8 -acre portion of the 50.786 -acre parcel at this time. The CPPS felt that it would be prudent to consider this area comprehensively and not deal with piecemeal requests. The CPPS recommended denial of this request and recommended that the Board of Supervisors consider the development of a land use plan for the Fairfax Pike area as a high priority. 107 North Kent Street o Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 August 01, 2000 Mr. Evan Wyatt, Deputy Director Frederick County Planning Department 107 North Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 RE: Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) boundary adjustment Dear Evan, Since our previous meeting with the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) we have prepared a plat showing the eight (8) acre area requested to be added to the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA), discussed the plat with the Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) and Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT). We are now prepared to move forward with our request and ask that the CPPS consider an adjustment of the SWSA to include the eight acre area shown on the attached plat. We clearly understand that the plat will have to be recorded within a specific time frame after approval of the SWSA boundary adjustment. Both FCSA and VDOT would like time to review the final survey plat prior to your approval. Mr. Jones of FCSA has indicated that his letter of September 21, 1999 is still valid. Mr. Melnikoff of VDOT has indicated that VDOT will require additional right-of-way dedicated along Route 636 (White Oak Road) and possibly some additional right-of-way on Route 277 ( Fairfax Pike). Should the CPPS approve our request we will be happy to condition our request to include review of a final plat by VDOT and FCSA and that the plat be recorded within 90 to 120 days after final approval of our request by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors. Sincerely, G, INC. of Planning & Development cc: VDOT & FCSA � enclosures: plat, VDOT Plan Sheet, Correspondence - VDOT & FCSA Triad Engineering, Inc_ Morgantown • St. Albans • Logan Greensburg Winchester • Harrisonburg West Virginia Pennsylvania Virginia COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA CHARLES D. NOTTINGHAM COMMISSIONER Triad Engineering Attn: Mr. Stephen Gyurisin P. O. Box 2397 Winchester, VA 22604 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION EDINBURG RESIDENCY 14031 OLD VALLEY PIKE EDINBURG. VA 22824 Dear Triad Engineering Gyurisin: March 14, 2000 JERRYA. COPD RESIDENT ENGINEER TELE (540) 984 �6N FAX (540) 964-5607 Ref Route 277 (Fairfax Pike) Project # 0277-034-104, PE101, RW201, M501 Federal Project # STP -277-8( ) Intersection Improvement at Route 277 And Route 636 Frederick County The Commonwealth Transportation Board approved the location and major design features of the above noted project on February 17, 2000, as proposed and presented at the October 19, 1999 public hearing. I wanted to apprise you of the design status of this project. The Department of Transportation will begin the appraisal and acquisition of right-of-way along with the relocation of utilities. We anticipate advertising for construction in fall of 2000. We sincerely appreciate your involvement and input on this project. If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to call me at (540) 984-5600. ✓ rel�� Ben H. Lineberry, Assistant Resident Engineer BHUvcz Cy: Mr. W. Byron Coburn, Jr. Mr. Jerry A. Copp WE KEEP VIRGINIA MOVING F1tEDERICK COUNI'Y SANITATION AUTHORITY P.G. Box 1877 Winchester VA 226044377 JAMES T. ANDERSON, CWairman ROBERT N. CARPENTER, Pice-chairman+ ROBERT F. MOWERY, Sec,"asurer ESTEN O. RUDOLPH, III JOHN STEVENS GREGORY W. HEWITT September 21, 1999 Mr. Steve Gyurisin G. W. Clifford & Associates, Inc. 200 North Cameron Street Winchester VA 22601 REFERENCED: Dear Mr. Gyurisin: Investment Land Trust Wellington EL Jones, P.E. Engineer-Direetor Ph. -(540)868-1061 Fax. - (540) 868-1429 I have reviewed your request for water and sewer services to the referenced tract. The Authority has water and sewer services available to this property. There is a 12 -inch water line along Route 277 and a 3 -inch force main along Route 636. This force main has limited capacity. The capacity ` required by the planned development may require the developer to enlarge the force main The Authority cannot agree to provide services to this tract until the Frederick County Board of Supervisors places it within the Water and Sewer Service Area or grants penuission for the Authority to provide service. If you have any questions, please call me. /ths Sincerely yours, W. H. Jones, P. E. Engineer -Director WATER AT YOUR S-rKRYICE THE PROPERTY EXISTINGDLANDTRECORDST HAS BEEN THIS �j PLAT HAS BEEMNIT yyPRDP��AjjRED FOB IHE BERRNPPIFIT RORT EXHIBIT TEA SF R OULNS OFRORDINANCEGYANY OAPttPDLICABLERGOVERNMENTAL N47°53'09"E 106.07' N38.37'41"E 25.39' N39.17'15"E 160.45' N39056'55"E 117.86' J l 23.47' y�P�� L (, 10 O� ph 8.000 ACRES p O 0y �0 �h NsOe oto ��. per' N38°14'47"E e ° gyp` 81.13' STgTF . RpUT N72.42'g8"E Bqe 24.27 N53°27'55"E S59°22'1y3"E 49.96` gg, F 156.47 S52°06'21"E N55°11'22"E 149.93' 104.51' N67°00`12"E 39.80' S70'21'S0"E 124.60' g S83.35' 04 >< 86.33 9" E � • ^� pp ala �I! AId 42.786 ACRES a� �O A^ Ld Z S12°45'1911W 237.66' Z � W 7 p o w S22°40'09"W 162.70' S77°46'50"W 537.11'14"W to 122.51 S23e46'0,5"W 161.43' 10 39.52 a N �. a a ja o !OF 1 1 COUNTY of FREDERICK f� Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director q RE: Request from Lynwood Ritter for Extension of Public Water and Sewer Service Outside of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) DATE: September 21, 2000 Included within this agenda item is information that has been prepared by Greenway Engineering, agent for Linwood Ritter. Mr. Ritter has requested to extend public water and sewer service outside of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) to serve parcel 86-A-208; zoned MH -1, Mobile Home Community District; containing 5.64 acres; located at the intersection of Hudson Hollow Road (Route 636) and Spotswood Court. The map prepared by the applicant's agent proposes to extend a sewer force main along the west side of Hudson Hollow Road which will tie into an existing sewer force main near Fairfax Pike, and to extend a water line along the east side of Hudson Hollow Road which will tie into an existing 12 -inch water line along the south side of Fairfax Pike. The size of the proposed sewer force main and the proposed water line has not been indicated by the applicant's agent. The request would require extension of public water and sewer service approximately 2000 feet outside of the SWSA boundary limits. Similar requests to serve this parcel have been considered by the county. On April 26,1995, the Board of Supervisors denied a request to extend sewer to this parcel, citing that it would establish a precedent. On July 13, 1998, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) considered a request to extend water service to this parcel. The CPPS felt that the extension of water service only would be appropriate provided that the size of the water line was limited to two inches and was designed specifically to serve the existing uses only on the 5.64 -acre parcel. This request was later denied by the Parks and Recreation Commission, which determined that it would be inappropriate to establish an easement within the Sherando Regional Park for the purpose of allowing a private property owner to tie into the water line within the park. The CPPS considered this request during their meeting of September 11, 2000. The CPPS felt that it was inappropriate to allow for the extension of public water and sewer service to this parcel. The CPPS felt that it would be prudent to consider this area comprehensively and not deal with piecemeal requests. The CPPS recommended denial of this request and recommended that the Board of Supervisors consider the development of a land use plan for the Fairfax Pike area as a high priority. 107 North Kent Street a Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 �yd L Founded in 1971 Ij-'2jDM7 TERM, 151 Wirdy Hill Lane Winchester, Virginia 22602 February 17, 2000 County of Frederick Dept. of Planning & Development 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, VA 22601 ATT: Evan Wyatt, Deputy Director of Planning RE: Sewer and Water Service Area Dear Mr. Wyatt: Greenway Engineering is representing Mr. Lynwood Ritter in an effort to have the sewer and water service area changed to serve his property. Said parcel, tax map no. 86-((A))-209, has an area of 32.46 acres, and fronts on both Spotswood Court and Perry Road (Route 636). The site, which houses a mobile home park, currently has a sewage lagoon. The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality is requiring Mr. Ritter to close the lagoon, necessitating a need for another source of sewage treatment. There are two potential treatment options available. A package sewage treatment plant could be installed on the site, or, as we recommend, this parcel could be served by the Frederick County Sanitation Authority through modification of the SWSA. The site is currently served by a well for water usage. I request that this matter be put on the agenda of the Frederick County Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee at the earliest possible date. Greenway Engineering will canvass other landowners if they would like to be included in this request. Supporting documents for this change will be provided several weeks before the committee meeting. Thank you for your time in this matter. Sincerely, Greenway Erigineering Ralph Beeman Enclosure 1108/rcb/dls Engineers Surveyors Telephone 540-662-4185 FA\ 540-722-9528 FREDERICK COUNTY SANITATION AUTHORITY P.O. Boz 1877 Winchester VA 22604-8377 JAMES T. ANDERSON, Chairman ROBERT N. CARPENTER, rice -chairman ROBEIRT F. MOWERY, Sec -treasurer ESTEN O. RUDOLPH, III JOHN STEVENS GREGORY W. HEWITT 1&. Ralph Beeman Greenway Engineering 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester VA 22602 February 17, 2000 REFERENCE: Lynwood Ritter Property Dear Mr. Beeman: Wellington H. Jones, P.E. Engineer -Director Ph. - (540) 868-1061 Fax. - (540) 868-1429 The Sanitation Authority cannot agree to extending water and sewer lines outside the sewer -water service area without approval of Frederick County. Providing service to the referenced location has been previously considered and denied by the County. I recommend sending your request to the Frederick County Planning Department for the County's consideration. /ths cf. Kris Tierney w/attzchment W. H. Jones, P. E. Engineer -Director WATER AT YOUR SERVICE i rUUrUzJhD FORCE MAIN LOCATION SERVING THE PROPERTY OF JOB NO.: 1108 LYNWOOD RITTER lsc�- uATE: FEB. 14, 'oo TH°� OPEQUON DISTRICT, FREDERICK COUNTY, VA 1 „=500' GREENWAY ENGINEERING 151 W10Y HITS. LANE Engineers MER. VA. 22602 Surveyors T=PHONE. (540) 662-4185 FAX. (540) 722-9528 1.971 E-MAIL areenwavemreenwavena nnrn U MARK D. SMITH A Na 022837 0 `pI4NAL COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/665-5651 FAX: 5401678-0682 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Evan A. Wyatt, Deputy Director RE: Urban Development Area (UDA) Expansion Request from Dorothy Carbaugh DATE: September 21, 2000 Included within this agenda item is information that has been prepared by Gilbert W. Clifford & Associates, Inc., agent for the Carbaugh Property and Dave Holliday Construction. The applicants have requested to expand the Urban Development Area (UDA) to incorporate approximately 82 acres of a 105 -acre parcel that is identified as parcel 85-A-138; zoned RA, Rural Areas District; and located on the east side of Town Run Lane (Route 1012), approximately 1/2 mile south of the intersection with Fairfax Pike (Route 277). The map prepared by the applicant's agent delineates the subject parcel, the location of the UDA as it traverses the parcel, and a general design layout of the parcel if the entire acreage would be incorporated into the UDA. The applicant's agent has provided an aerial photograph which identifies the 105 -acre parcel looking east from the Town of Stephens City and crossing Interstate 81. Additional information pertaining to the 105 -acre parcel and adjoining area has been provided in a letter from C.E. Maddox, Jr., P.E., Vice President, to Evan Wyatt, dated August 31, 2000. The CPPS considered this request during their meeting of September 11, 2000. The CPPS believed that if land was not made available for RP District development that the only alternative would be for the development of five -acre lots outside of the UDA. The CPPS expressed concern that the increased development of land outside of the UDA will exacerbate residential sprawl and increase the cost of providing services to county residents. The CPPS recommended approval of this request and recommended that the Board of Supervisors consider initiating a study to determine appropriate areas for the expansion of the UDA so this issue could be dealt with comprehensively instead of on a case-by-case basis. 107 North Kent Street • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5600 gilbert w. difford & associates, ine i1NCORPORA= 1972 Engineers — Surveyors — Land Planners — Water Quality 31 August 2000 Mir. Evan Wyatt Frederick County Planning 107 N. Kent Street Winchester, Virginia 22601 : "Carbaugh Property" Dave Holladay Construction Dear Evan, Board oir3irectors- president: Thomas J. O'Toole, P.E. Vice Presidents: Charles E. Maddox, Jr., P.E. Earl R. Sutherland, P.E. Ronald A. Mslowsky, P.E. David J. Saunders, P.E. 1Directur : P. Duane Brown, L.S. William L. Wright Michael A. Hammer Thomas W. Price Attached is a concept plan for a single family "RP" development on the above tract; located immediately south of Stephens Run and east of 181 near Stephens City, Virginia. This tract is partially within the designated urban development area (UDA) as defined in the current Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. It has water and sewer service on the adjacent parcel to the north Those lands capable of supporting residential development to the north have been developed. The geology is Martinsburg Shale which is not viable for continued agriculture. The property is in Estate and under contract by Dave Holliday subject to rezoning. Mr. Holliday is a proven quality developer in Frederick County. Mr. Holliday's projects include Lakeside Estates, Fredericktown III, Carriebrooke, Briarwood and Mem mans Estates. Currently lands zoned RP are not available to Mr. Holliday in order for his various groups to continue development in Frederick County's Idential market. The request of this application is that a review of the attached data and description by your Comprehensive Plan Subcommittee and Planning Commission would allow agreement that an application for rezoning to RP is both timely and reflective of the highest and best use of the subject tract. The offsite transportation network created by this project will improve the County's transportation network, especially at the Stephens City Interchange and focus attention of Transportation Planning Officials to the concept of a new interchange, an idea which has been requested for further study by the Town, commercial owners and transportation officials alike. We are pleased to submit this request and look forward to our discussions. PIease advise if you need anything additional. Sincerely yours, giibet-t w. clii%lyd &asoc' es, inc. Maddox, Jr., P.E., ice President MW Enclosure cc: Nk Dave Holliday 200 North Cameron Street, Winchester, Virginia 2260I (540) 667-2139 EaN (540) 665-0493 e-mail gwcli$ [i mnsinc.com Member American Consu!#ng Engineers Council a Wary t—II; wick cr '� .�: •\ ter\ .\\��\ � �. Site Of Rezoning `` \ ��.��(�7 a .a,y / From A To RP 105 Acres I1�.s A 1JH �, � ��P �/ Wo,Y Eotcc �1! klcy \/�\ . • • \\ �/ /� /', � "` /, / �\ s i Pond \ XxL .'k 41. `� 5 `fie. �� \y/�; 4Q,,<n .� +>,i 0.t !+r OXO sn_ .�'� � F .. .$il1C'�va,y� Fc�' 2Ci Ali V�if r L � ��5 :Grey `•,;alf:Q 1 / r �k SrJj7il� ! /, %fj, 130 66 ��A 153 ``. •'"tea '�:� �� _\ �-��fcY?t;�� :r. '•��•...,�.�_,-.., \;: � SCALE SQU SHMET-L-44