Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC 12-07-05 Meeting Agenda
FILE COPY AGE'l „h FREDERICK COUNT' PLANNING COMMISSION The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building Winchester, Virginia December 7, 2005 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) November 2, 2005 Minutes.............................................................................................. (A) 2) Committee Reports.................................................................................................. (no tab) 3) Citizen Comments.................................................................................................... (no tab) PUBLIC HEARING 4) Conditional Use Permit 909-05 of Richard Heisey for a Cottage Occupation— Woodworking Shop. This property is located at 663 Dicks Hollow Road (Route 663), and is identified with Property Identification Number 41 -A -40D in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Mr. Kirby......................................................................................................................... (B) 5) To consider proposed modifications to the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (WJELUP), an element of the Comprehensive Policy Plan, including the expansion of the Urban Development Area (UDA) and the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) by 267 acres. The UDA/SWSA expansion is Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment (CPPA) Request #08-04 (Solenberger/Bridgeforth Properties). The Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan covers properties bounded by Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) to the south, Route 37 to the west, Merriman's Lane (Route 62 1) and the City of Winchester to the north and the City of Winchester to the east. The subject properties are identified by Property Identification Numbers (PINS) 52-A-310, 53-A-90, 53-A-91, 53-A-92, 53 -A -92A, 53-A-9213, 53-A-94, 53-A-95, 53-3-A, 53-3-A1, 63-A-1 (only the portion east of Route 37), 63 -A -IA; 63-AIE, 63 -A -2A, 63-A-213, 63 -A -2D, and 63 -A -2L, in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Mrs. Eddy........................................................................................................................ (C) PUBLIC MEETING 6) Master Development Plan #11-05 for Westbury Commons, submitted by Greenway Engineering for 11 Proffered, Age -Restricted, Single Family Small Lot Detached Dwellings. The properties are located on the east side of Westminster Canterbury Drive, approximately 500 feet south of the intersection of Route 522 and Westminster Canterbury Drive, and are identified with Property Identification Numbers 53-4-3-E and 53-4-3F, in the Stonewall Magisterial District, Ms. Perkins...................................................................................................................... (D) 7) Waiver Request for Gas Mart #7, submitted by Keith Engineering, Inc., to consider an entrance spacing waiver permitted in Article IV Section 165-2913(1), of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance to allow for a new commercial entrance to be placed less than 200' from an existing road and an existing entrance. Ms. Perkins...................................................................................................................... (E) 8) Subdivision Request #22-05 of Lake Holiday, Section 10, submitted by Urban Engineering & Associates, for the relocation of 14 single-family detached lots. The property is located along Master Drive within Section 10, Lake Holiday, and is identified with Property Identification Number 18 -A -J, in the Gainesboro Magisterial District. Mr. Cheran....................................................................................................................... (F) 9) Subdivision Waiver Request of Titan Virginia Ready -Mix, LLC, submitted by Lawson and Silek, P.L.C., for a subdivision waiver in order to subdivide a 5.52 acre parcel in the EM (Extractive Manufacturing) District. The property is located south of Woodside Road (Route 671), and is identified with Property Identification Number 33-A-133 in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Mr. Cheran....................................................................................................................... (G) DISCUSSION 10) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Mr. Henry......................................................................................................................... (II) I 1 Eastern Road Plan Mr. Suchicital.................................................................................................................... (I) 12) Other MEETING MINUTES OF THE FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on November 2, 2005. PRESENT: Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman/Stonewall District; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon District; Pat Gochenour, Red Bud District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; Robert A. Morris, Shawnee District; June M. Wilmot, Shawnee District; Cordell Watt, Back Creek District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Richard C. Ours, Opequon District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Marie F. Straub, Red Bud District; H. Paige Manuel, Member -At -Large; Barbara Van Osten, Board of Supervisors' Liaison; and Lawrence R Ambrogi, Legal Counsel. ABSENT: David Shore, City of Winchester Liaison. STAFF PRESENT: Eric R La ATence, Planning Director; Mark R Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator; Candice E. Perkins, Planner II; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER Chairman DeHaven called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COMMITTEE REPORTS Development Review & Regulations Subcommittee (DRRS) —10/27/05 Mtg. Commissioner Unger reported that the DRRS had two minor house -keeping items on their agenda. He said one item was to modify a misprint in Section 165-59 (12) of the zoning ordinance and the other item was to modify the wording of Section 24 (b) of the subdivision ordinance. Transportation Committee -11/01/05 Mtg. Commissioner Kriz reported that the Transportation Committee reviewed the Eastern Road Plan. He said the only suggestion that was madein the recommendation from the CPPS (Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee) was for the consideration of an interchange of Route 37 with Route 11, so that traffic would not have to travel onto I-81 and then back down to Route 11. Commissioner Kriz said the Transportation Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of November 2, 2005 Page 1624 -2 - Committee recommended approval of the Eastern Road Plan and the Planning Commission will be seeing it shortly. Sanitation Authority (SA) Commissioner Unger said the rainfall report for September was less than one-half inch; he said the flows in the plants for September were down 30% because of the low rainfall_ Commissioner Unger reported that the Parkins Mill Plant will be upgraded in the near future; the goal is to raise the plant to a six mgd capacity and the cost will be approximately 32-35 million dollars. He added that the County is drawing 5.4 mgd from the quarries and from the City of Winchester. PUBLIC MEETING Master Development Plan #11-05 of Westbury Commons, submitted by Greenway Engineering for 11 proffered age -restricted, single-family, small -lot detched dwellings. The properties are located on the east side of Westminster Canterbury Drive, approximately 500 feet south of the intersection of Route 522 and Westminster -Canterbury Drive. The properties are further identified with P.I.N.s 534-3-E and 53-4- 3F in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Action — Tabled Planner Candice E. Perkins reported that this application proposes to develop 11 age -restricted, single-family, small -lot, detached dwellings on 3.13 acres, zoned RP (Residential Performance) District. She said the rezoning for this property was approved on February 9, 2005 with proffers. Ms. Perkins stated that with this master development plan, the applicant is requesting a waiver of the community center requirement pursuant to Section 165-64A(1). In order to meet the requirements of the waiver, the applicant is proposing to provide two park benches and trails, which were proffered during the rezoning, and a 14 -foot gazebo. Ms. Perkins stated that the master development plan provided in the Commission's agenda packet was not current. She said the applicant submitted a revised master development plan to the staffyesterday which has addressed all of the issues identified in the staff's report. Ms. Perkins showed the revised master development plan on the overhead screen for the Commission members; she pointed out the sidewalks, the widened streets, and the corrected buffer details. Commissioner Unger asked the staff if the Parks and Recreation Department was satisfied that the applicant's proposal of a gazebo, two park benches, and trails would meet the required equivalent recreational value of a community center. Ms. Perkins replied that the Parks and Recreation Department has already submitted their approvals. Mr. Evan A. Wyatt, with Greenway Engineering, was present to represent Harvest Communities, Inc., the owners of Westbury Commons. Mr. Wyatt reviewed the details of the revisions with the Commission members. Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of November 2, 2005 10 nA V Page 1625 V -3 - Commissioner Gochenour was not certain that paved trails should count towards open space because of the impervious surface. Commissioner Gochenour also believed that senior citizens would much prefer a small community center for social activities, rather than a gazebo that could only be used for part of the year; she said she would be opposed to the applicant's waiver request for that reason. In addition, Commissioner Gochenour asked for a detailed description of the stormwater management for the project. In response to the request for stormwater management details, Mr. Wyatt replied that the County's engineer had requested the applicant consider assisting with the existing stormwater pond on the Canterbury Square property. He said the County's engineer wanted them to consider stormwater management designed to encapsulate the entire area. Mr. Wyatt said they have complied with this request and the applicant's stormwater management plan has been designed so the post -development storm outlet will be less than the predevelopment conditions. He added that their design will create a better storm water drainage system than what is out there presently. Commissioner Kriz asked the applicant if he was provided a sufficient amount oftime to respond to the staff's comments so these revisions could have been included in the Commission's agenda packet. Commissioner Kriz said he was disturbed by continuously having revisions come in at Planning Commission meetings that have not been included in the agenda package. He said this does not give the Commission time to see the changes prior to the meeting. Since it appeared the applicant had sufficient time to respond to the staff's comments, Commissioner Kriz said that from this point forward, he would move to table all applications that are revised and not included in the Commission's agenda package prior to the meeting. Chairman DeHaven noted that the trail system had access to what appeared to be private driveways in three separate locations; he asked if those areas would be provided with public access easements. Mr. Wyatt replied that they would. There were no citizen comments concerning the master development plan. Commissioner Kriz stated that although all of the issues have been addressed, on a matter of principle, he would move that this master plan be tabled until the Planning Commission can receive all of the information in their agenda packet. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Gochenour. BE IT RESOLVED, THAT by a majority vote, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby table Master Development Plan # 11-05 of Westbury Commons, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for 11 proffered age -restricted, single-family, small -lot detached dwellings until such time as the applicant can provide the revised copies of the plan in the Conunission's agenda package. DISCUSSION Site Plan #21-05 for Frederick County's 11"' Elementary School to be located on Rosa Lane, which connects to Route 522 South via Justus Drive. This capital improvement project is being presented to the Planning Commission for informational purposes and no action is required. No Action Required- Frederick equired Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1626 Minutes of November 2, 2005 � �} -4 - Planner Candice E. Perkins presented the preliminary site plan for the new Frederick County elementary school to be located on Rosa Lane, which connects to Route 522 South via Justus Drive, and will be adjacent to the new Admiral Byrd Middle School. Ms. Perkins said that customarily, projects involving public facilities are brought before the Planning Commission prior to site plan approval for comments; however, no action is required by the Commission. Ms. Perkins introduced Mr. Bill Shelton with Oliver, Webb, Pappas & Rhudy, Inc., the design engineering firm, and Mr. Larry Rickard, a representative of the Frederick County Public Schools. Commissioner Thomas inquired about the number of students the school was designed to accommodate and if that number was a standard used by the school system. Mr. Shelton replied that the school was designed for 650 students. Mr. Shelton thought the 650 figure was standard; however, he anticipated that number to be increased very soon. Commissioner Thomas asked various other questions about the numbers used for design capacity; he was concerned this school was going to be opening at full capacity. Commissioner Ours asked about the site selection process and how it was determined that this was the best geographical location to place the new elementary school. Recognizing the growth areas east of I-81 and the attendance zones between Senseny Road and Atmel, Mr. Rickard said this location was about midway; he said this area was chosen as the most feasible and also because water and sewer were available. Commissioner Ours said that he has heard of instances, brought about by over -crowding, where children in the same family have to attend separate schools that were miles apart. He said there will be four elementary schools in southern Frederick County and he hoped it would work geographically and the attendance zones could be improved. Referring to the location of the two schools, Commissioner Wilmot commented that everyone was already aware this location was originally intended for industrial use, at least within the Southern Frederick Land Use Plan. Commissioner Wilmot recalled when the Southern Frederick Land Use Plan was put together and how diligently everyone worked to incorporate the 25% rule so that a portion of the land in this area would develop with commercial and industrial uses. She was concerned about the possibilities for conflicts therewith further development. She said that if this area now goes in another direction, the County will have lost a location that was identified as a tax base. Commissioner Moms next asked Mr. Shelton to review the advantages and disadvantages of constructing campus -style school enviromnents and if the County was likely to see more of this type of designin the future. Mr. Shelton noted that from a general planning standpoint, the campus environment is good for economies of scale and transportation and the aspect of shared parking for special events. Commissioner Straub stated that this new school was not centrally located between the Senseny Road area and Armel; she said it was 1.7 miles away from Armel and would be at least ten miles from the Senseny Road area. Commissioner Straub said that many of the schoolchildren in the Senseny Road area would be going to this school. She commented that with 10,000 houses currently in the pipeline, this school would be at or over capacity on the day it opens. She was disappointed that nothing was being done for the areas that are growing so rapidly. Commissioner Straub was also disappointed that this new school was down -sized to the point where there is one girls' bathroom and one boys' bathroom for the second, third, fourth, and fifth graders. Commissioner Unger asked if the design for this school was used previously. Mr. Rickard replied this plan was a spin-off from a design they have been using for a number of years. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 1627 Minutes of November 2, 2005 M W J -5 - Commissioner Gochenour had questions regarding the stormwater management; she was interested in initiating a regional watershed plan with Bufflick Run. Mr. Shelton said that on this particular site, an adjacent property owner has offered a portion of his land to construct a regional stomiwater management pond, which is why a permanent stormwater management pond has not been shown on this site. Mr. Shelton said that flows from their site will be directed to a natural drainage channel which will carry drainage to a location on the adjacent property, where the owner will construct a pond. He said the agreement between the school board and the adjacent property owner specifies that the adjacent property owner will maintain the stormwater pond. Board of Supervisors' Liaison, Barbara Van Osten, asked the staff to identify the recreational facilities. She also inquired about the realignment of Papermill Road. Planning Director, Eric R Lawrence replied that there was no effort at this point to acquire cost-sharing funds for the realignment of Papermill Road because the affected property owner was not interested in participating. No action was required by the Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Charles S. DeHaven, Jr., Chairman Eric R Lawrence, Secretary Frederick County Planning Commission Minutes of November 2, 2005 00 nh F Page 1628 Y t!' w4 �� CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #09-05 RICHARD HEISEY Staff Report for the Planning Commission °I Prepared: November 17; 2005 13fl Staff Contact: John D. Kirby, Zoning Inspector This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/07/05 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/11/06 Pending LOCATION: This subject property is located at 663 Dicks Hollow Road (Route 663). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 41 -A-40D PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT' USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) District Land Use: ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Vacant East: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Residential South: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Residential West: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Residential PROPOSED USE: Cottage Occupation — Woodworking Shop REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Dept. of Transportation: The application for a conditional/special use permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 608, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. CUP 409-05, Richard Heisey November 17, 2005 Page 2 Fire Marshall: Adequate turnaround provisions for fire apparatus must be maintained, a vertical clearance of 13.5 feet over the entire roadway width must also be maintained. A minimum of 4 inch high posted address numbers visible from the street or road fronting the property as required by the International Fire Code section 505.1. Open burning of waste materials is prohibited under IFC 307.2.2. Two portable fire extinguishers with a minimum rating of 2A, l OBC are required. One at the storage area of flammable liquids and wood product storage and one at the main building exit. Spray finishing shall comply with the attached copy of IFC 1504.1.4. Plan approval recommended. Inspections Department: Existing buildings shall comply with The Virginia Uniform, Statewide Building Code and Sections 306, Use Group F (Factory and Industrial) of the International Building Code/2000. Other Code that applies is IBC/ANSI Al 17,1-98 Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities. A change of use permit is required and a new certificate of use shall be issued prior to operation. Please submit a floor plan of the building at the time of change of use building permit application. HC parking and access to the building is required. Health Department: Health Dept. has no objection as along as there is to be no additional employees other than the current occupant and no additional water use. Planning and Zoniniz: This proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is for a Cottage Occupation, for a woodworking shop business. This proposed use will take place on seven acres of land located in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District off of Dicks Hollow Road. This business will be conducted in a 30 foot by 65 foot existing accessory structure at the rear of property, which is used as a workshop. This building is 54 feet from any adjoining property line, and screened by natural wooded vegetation from side and rear property lines. The applicant requests three (3) employees to be associated with this Conditional Use Permit. The health department has requested that no more than eight people be allowed on this drain field. There is a gravel lot alongside the structure sufficient for employee parking. The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for a Cottage Occupation in the RA Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Based on the limited scale of the applicant's proposed cottage occupation, it appears it would not have negative impacts on adjoining properties or detract from the rural character of the area. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 12/07/05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would recommend the following conditions: 1. All review agency requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. Any expansion or change of use shall require a new conditional use permit. 3. No retail sales of merchandise shall be permitted on site. CUP #09-05, Richard Heisey November 17, 2005 Page 3 4. No more than three (3) employees shall be permitted. This property has a drainfield capacity of up to eight people, so the health department has requested that no more than eight people be allowed on the drain field, including employees. 5. No business signs shall be permitted. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. CHRISTIANSON 52 A 1 HEISEY 41 A 40C CHESHIRE 41 A 52 >y a SPP BEC RATCLIFFE :HEISEY a^ A 40D v m 2� " FLANAGAN 4s P 41 A 55 o- HIETT 41 A 56 41 A 53 r m SPROENj'LS 52 A 32 mp sP GO CkAYTOW D 8erman.te 41E4E(gND wisLn _ FP 41 PANGLE O C s? O,Pe/ g9 SPORE 52 A 34 9 1 IsB 52 14 D �P P ENOT ZIMMERMANN Map Features Zoning 414 A CONRAD N Bridges ^� Culverts 41 A 396 IACONE �_ Lakes/Ponds V Dams V B2 (Business, General District) `1 R4 (Residential, Planned Community District) 43 41 A 50A .nr.. Streams ZIMMERMAN 41 A 40 Buildings W " EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) Q RA (Rural Areas District) 41 A 39C HEISEY 41 A 40E Tans a 1n%' b' O MI (Industrial, Light District) HE (Higher Education District) Q RP (Residential Performance District)CD p Q h ZQ^ a Parcels CHRISTIANSON 52 A 1 HEISEY 41 A 40C CHESHIRE 41 A 52 >y a SPP :HEISEY a^ A 40D v m 2� " FLANAGAN 4s P 41 A 55 o- HIETT 41 A 53 r m CLARK 52 A 29 FUNKHOUSER 41 A 54 vc°9i Gly BROWN 52 A 36 CARPER 52 A 27 N GRAMS r m SPROENj'LS 52 A 32 CkAYTOW D 8erman.te 51 A 31 wisLn _ PANGLE O C s? O,Pe/ 52 A 33 KENNY SPORE 52 A 34 9 1 IsB 52 14 D �P P �4yti Map Features Zoning Application N Bridges ^� Culverts <U> B7 (Business, Neighborhood District) Q MS (Medical Support District) CUP # 09 - 05 �_ Lakes/Ponds V Dams V B2 (Business, General District) `1 R4 (Residential, Planned Community District) .nr.. Streams f;./ Retaining Walls B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District) eP R 5 (Residential Recreational Community District) Richard H e i sey Buildings R�o`a��'d Centerlines EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) Q RA (Rural Areas District) Tans a 1n%' b' O MI (Industrial, Light District) HE (Higher Education District) Q RP (Residential Performance District)CD (41 - A -40D) Parcels /v M2 (Industrial, General District) N 0 swsA Trails uDA MHf (Mobile Home Community District) w 0 75 150 300 s Feet vc°9i Gly BROWN 52 A 36 Submittal Deadline P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 1. Applicant (The applicant if the 'r-� owner othert ADDRESS: TELEPHONE Q 2. Please list all owners, occupants, or parties in interest of the property: 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of your road or street) 4. The property has a road frontage of IJ SM feet and a depth of feet and consists of ?_oo acres. (Please be exact) U, J j -k • �- 1,1+ 1"S 336-,+- 5. 3(i'+5. The property is owned by J,. #-qV1 _ (' as evidenced by deed from Mcrec,6rded (previous owner) in deed book no. R8 on page OR2, as recorded in the records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court, County of Frederick. 6. Tax(Parcel)Identification (I.D. No. Magisterial District Current Zoning 7. Adjoining North East South West Property: USE e dF - w e ZOONiING � ,d S. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept. before completing) 9. It is proposed that,the following -buildings -will be constructed: VNe 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: NAME 1AA cf ,sn» fl - &us ADDRESS 4S-1 Or CK 5 PROPERTY ID# 401,J `uC�7eS'✓, I�i�• �a643 NAME ADDRESS Pne PROPERTY ID# 1A) LVLGJ\r S A6T-,, V19 `3,k,!�C — NAME �-C'6"S+�m&5nLi ADDRESS 303 tt Ypers 1t daw Laite PROPERTY ID# Sa ( Q t e b �, v4 IX 6 03 NAME V. 06YK ADDRESS * S J) I C-ks Y6110ci 0 - PROPERTY ID# ,�� 1'y `pZ �T' ch S - a a 66 NAME ��nt� �..1L } tTP( L -ro5eADDRESS ,LJrC -stIoLi PROPERTY ID# /A I n bJt'' a r 5 -&v V8. a60-3 NAME C R a U [ 5,a q PROPERTY ID# NAME trSeu PROPERTY ID# e . C "kd scS I1. �e NAME r- , " PROPERTY IDI 41 A IS-Q— ADDRESS 3 LO i L4 C -he 4 4e4/ M. X403 ADDRESS 6-62 cC- (LJJbLJ LJ i%k'Le 5�&/ 1(a. a V03 . R ADDRESS G AyyAz+. , ab��-� Gdt�ada 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. 6 c7c-4, A-#6-c,4*e-J IRS 4 urwrvrlt 1 Reserve S . WELL BUILDING - PP,OP�P,TY Alb MILPIN6 AYOUf 68. DWELLING \ \ LOT 2 7,000 ACF�S SEE REGISTERED LAND SURVEY FOR TECHNICAL SURVEY INFORMATION. THIS IS FOR HOUSE LOCATION PURPOSES ONLY. HEISEY LIMITED 141 Poorhouse Road Winchester, VA 22601 EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE 60' PICKS HOLLOW FOAP (VA. RTE. 608) /-- Wet Weather Stream 50 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY IRS l DRAWING NAME: PLOT PLAN CUSTOMER: Rick Heisey SIZE: "A" DWG NO. 0002 REV NO:OO SCALE: AS SHOWN DRAWN BY: RLH SHEET: 0 12. Additional comments, if any: `S I.Jc�g �'�io�. - 0X)Y- ye_<t � �r q L)o(5� waykX.ue LL 11 sw aLLI`1 c.t!jE> cl, GOCCLA C<_hV J L0156'4 UAWL"A'n Ok 73:a 1 i U� 0 D t d> d O U e L4 5 h op.. wee ( ��Q� �z-e ��l�L-��v-�l carve 1 -r ALD (� "Ing S O kcYee, 1i3 C 4,t �? _r �d Ws�0 to Cc -,v -m, Ltvv` e t I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven ( 7 ) days prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Signature of owner Owners' Mailing Address Owners' Telephone No. TO BE COMPLETED BY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: J C • • PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE WESTERN JUBAL eo EARLY LAND USE PLAN & w° UDA/SWSA EXPANSION REQUEST (CPPA 08-04) - a SOLENBERGERBRIDGEFORTH PROPERTIES yelp Staff Report for the Planning Commission Meeting Prepared: November 22, 2005 Staff Contact: Susan K. Eddy, AICP, Senior Planner This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in the discussion of this request It may also be useful to others interested in this comprehensive planning matter. CPPS: CPPS: CPPS: CPPS: CPPS: Planning Commission: Board of Supervisors: Board of Supervisors: Planning Commission: Board of Supervisors: Reviewed 09/13/04 10/11/04 11/08/04 03/14/05 04/11/05 05/04/05 (Discussion) 05/25/05 (Discussion) 11/09/05 (Discussion) Action Discussed Discussed Discussed Discussed Recommendation forwarded Comments forwarded Discussed Directed scheduling of public hearing 12/07/05 (Public Hearing) Pending 01/11/06 (Public Hearing) Pending PROPOSAL: To revise the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan including expansion of the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) by 267 acres. PLANNED USE: Residential and Commercial LOCATION: The properties are located east of Route 37, north of Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) and west and south of the City of Winchester. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee PROPERTY ID NUMBERS FOR WESTERN JUBAL EARLY LAND USE PLAN: 52-A- 310, 53-A-90, 53-A-91, 53-A-92, 53 -A -92A, 53 -A -92B, 53-A-94, 53-A-95, 53-3-A, 53 -3 -A1,63 - A -1 (only the portion east of Route 37), 63 -A -1A, 63 -A -1E, 63 -A -2A, 63A -2B, 63-A-21), & 63- A -2L. Solenberger/Bridgeforth Properties November 22, 2005 Page 2 PROPERTY ID NUMBERS FOR UDA/SWSA EXPANSION: 63-A-1 (only the portion east of Route 37), 52-A-310, 63 -A -1A, 63 -A -1E, 63A -2B, 63 -A -2D, & 63 -A -2L PLANNING STAFF EVALUATION: Existing Conditions The subject sites, as well as the adjacent properties to the west and south, are presently zoned RA (Rural Areas District) and are in residential and agricultural uses. Parcels southeast of the subject sites are zoned RP (Residential Performance District) and are being developed for age - restricted housing (the Village at Harvest Ridge). Sites to the east in the City of Winchester are zoned High Density Residential District (HR) and Residential Office District (RO-1) and contain a mix of housing types with some offices along Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622). Sites to the north in the City of Winchester (Meadow Branch) are zoned Low Density Residential District (LR) and sites to the northwest in Frederick County (Merrimans Chase and Merrimans Estate) are zoned RP. Comprehensive Policy Plan Land Use Plan The subject properties proposed for UDA expansion are not included in any of the small area land use plans included in the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. The properties adjacent to the north (known as the White/Marshall properties) are included in the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (WJELUP) adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 11, 2004. That version of the WJELUP calls for both residential use and a mix of residential and commercial uses. Staff Comment: The Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS), when they considered. this UDA expansion, requested that staff modify the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (adopted February 11, 2004) to include a wider area encompassing the proposed UDA expansion area. A modified version of the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan was endorsed by the CPPB on April 11, 2005. The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors considered the CPPS endorsed plan and the UDA/SWSA expansion as a discussion item. Staff has incorporated the modifications requested by the Board of Supervisors at its meeting on November 9, 2005 into the draft version dated November 22, 2005, which is attached. The most significant change is the removal of the mixed-use designation and its replacement with a commercial designation. Text has been correspondingly changed. This reflects the Board's desire to see a much more significant commercial component in the WJELUP area. Other changes include text change covering the sinkhole which has been filled, the protection of another historic property and text changes to reflect the adopted MPO 2030 Transportation Plan. Solenberger/Bridgeforth Properties November 22, 2005 Page 3 Transportation The Eastern Road Plan of the Comprehensive Policy Plan does not cover this portion of the County. The Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (adopted February 11, 2004) identifies transportation improvements in the northern portion of the WJELUP area. These improvements include the extension of Jubal Early Drive to an urban divided four - lane standard, a new interchange with Route 37 and a major collector road in a north - south direction to connect Juba] Early Drive and Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622). The Win -Fred Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2030 Transportation Plan calls for the Extension of Jubal Early Drive (4 -lane cross section) to Route 37. It calls for a new diamond interchange of Route 37 with Jubal Early Drive, with a realignment of Merrimans Lane. It also calls for Cedar Creek Grade to be widened to a 4 -lane section from the city limits to Merrimans Lane, with signalized ramps at the intersection of Cedar Creek Grade and Route 37. Finally, the MPO Plans calls for a new collector road connecting Jubal Early Drive extended and Cedar Creek Grade. Policies endorsing the transportation improvements called for in the above mentioned plans are included in the attached plan. Community Facilities and Service This proposed UDA expansion, together with the land already planned for residential development north of the these sites, would lead to a large number of school age children concentrated in a small area that is unprecedented in the western part of Frederick County. It will be incumbent upon future development within the overall WJELUP area to provide sites for school facilities, to mitigate the impact of the large number of school children resulting from this development. Language to this effect is included in the attached plan. The Frederick County School Board passed a resolution on January 18, 2005 requesting that the West Jubal Early land Use Plan include 25-30 acres for a multi - campus school site and further that the school site be consistent with the Community Facilities and Services policies of the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. It may also be necessary to provide other public facilities in this area to serve this new development. It would then be necessary for future development to provide a site for other public facilities to mitigate the impact resulting from this development. Language to this effect is included in the attached plan. The Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) does not currently serve this area. The FCSA would be the water service provider and the sewer service provider for this geographic portion of the County unless their Board grants the authority for service to the City of Winchester Public Utilities. SolenbergerBridgeforth Properties November 22, 2005 Page 4 COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE (CPPS)_ SUMMARY & ACTION OF 09/13/04 MEETING: The CPPS was generally supportive of this UDA expansion request. Concerns were raised, however, on a number of topics. Primary concerns. were the impact of this proposed development on the transportation network and the impact on schools and other public facilities. The CPPS suggested that a land use plan be prepared to accompany this UDA expansion request. Staff was directed to modify the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (as adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 11, 2004) to incorporate the whole quadrant bound by the City of Winchester to the east, Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) to the south, Route 37 to the west and Merriman's Lane and the City of Winchester to the north. COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE (CPPS) SUMMARY & ACTION OF 10/11/04 MEETING: The CPPS was generally supportive of this UDA expansion request. Staff presented a modified version of the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (as adopted by the Board of Supervisors on February 11, 2004) to incorporate the whole quadrant bound by the City of Winchester to the east, Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622) to the south, Route 37 to the west and Merriman's Lane and the City of Winchester to the north. CPPS members discussed the modified plan, but felt that staff had not clearly articulated their concerns over transportation, particularly the planned interchange at Jubal Early Drive and Route 37 and their concerns with schools and other public facilities. The applicant requested that the proposed school site not be identified on a map, but rather be described in the text with the final location and alignment remaining flexible to ensure that it conforms to final engineering studies and School Board considerations. The CPPS directed staff to further modify the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan to take account of CPPS concerns and the applicant's concern with an identified school site. COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE (CPPS) SUMMARY & ACTION OF 11/08/04 MEETING: Staff presented a further modified version of the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan. Transportation improvements, especially the new interchange at Jubal Early Drive and Route 37, were discussed. Possible public/private partnerships were considered. Action on this item was deferred until the next CPPS meeting. Staff was directed to revise the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan text on transportation improvements to add back in language on public/private partnerships. Solenberger/Bridgeforth Properties November 22, 2005 Page 5 The applicant submitted a letter to the Planning Department dated December 2, 2004 requesting that the Solenberger/Bridgeforth UDA Expansion be taken off the agenda of the CPPS until March, 2005. COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE (CPPS) SUMMARY & ACTION OF 03/14/05 MEETING: Staff presented a further modified version of the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan. Members again voiced concern over the text in the WJELUP on transportation and directed staff to come up with alternate wording. COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PROGRAMS SUBCOMMITTEE (CPPS) SUMMARY & ACTION OF 04/11/05 MEETING: Staff presented a further modified version of the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan. The applicant's representative, Mr. Evan Wyatt of Greenway Engineering, proposed alternate transportation wording for one paragraph. The CPPS endorsed the staff proposed wording and endorsed the plan that is attached. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF 05/04/05 MEETING: The Planning Commission considered this request as a discussion item at their meeting on May 4, 2005. Two members of the public spoke. One questioned the residential density in the proposed plan and also suggested a landscape buffer on the north side of Cedar Creek Grade. The applicant requested softer language on the Route 37/Jubal Early Drive interchange. The applicant's greatest concern with the Route 37 interchange was not an unwillingness to participate, but rather the need to include land west of Route 37 that is outside of the study area. The applicant further suggested a cooperative effort between the City, the County, the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) and property owners. Planning Commissioners raised a number of questions on transportation and schools. Commissioners were divided on whether to support the transportation wording in the plan endorsed by the CPPS or the language suggested by the applicant. Some Commissioners noted that this interchange needed to include participation from the City of Winchester. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUMMARY & ACTION OF 05/25/05 MEETING: The Board of Supervisors agreed to send a letter to the Commonwealth Transportation Board asking whether an interchange at Route 37 and Jubal Early Drive would qualify for a full or partial access. The Board then tabled this request. Solenberger/Bridgeforth Properties November 22, 2005 Page 6 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS SUMMARY & ACTION OF 11/09/05 MEETING: The Board of Supervisors discussed in-depth the proposed mixed-use areas. The Board wanted a much greater commercial component throughout the WJELUP area to achieve a better mix of residential and commercial uses. The Board agreed that the mixed-use areas shown on the proposed land use plan be designated as commercial areas and that the text be changed accordingly. Some Board Members reiterated their strong support for a school site in this area. The Board also directed staff to revise the plan to include the protection of the Baker, Jacob House, to revise the text concerning the sinkhole, and to include appropriate references to the MPO 2030 Transportation Plan. The Board agreed to schedule this item for a public hearing. Following the required public hearing, a recommendation regarding these Comprehensive Policy Plan revisions to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. Attachment v 37 se St /fJ % % e � 8i•r:kner Dr 9e IN W AS / t mist q Peel a'F yid tp \ ti4 � ll 7 �ti' � X• � �f !� o s I37 37 ,/ III // \�� \ ^ �d - � �°• LVc II Tee �9r�, a y r,,,c5c Created by Solenberger / Bridgeforth N Frederick County Planning C WJELUP - Existing UDA Expansion WJELUP -Proposed Expansion W E 0 0.125 0.25 0.s (Solenberger/Bridgeforth Properties) Locator Map i --- ;` www Miles S Public Hearing Item for the Planning Commission — Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (WJELUP) November 22, 2005 WESTERN JUBAL EARLY LAND USE PLAN (Originally adopted by the Frederick County Board of Supervisors - February 11, 2004) Revised draft as agreed to by the Board of Supervisors — November 9, 2005 Guiding Principles A new community of over 600 acres is planned in a portion of the County where previously there was little but farmland. The area contains sensitive environmental features and these will be preserved. This new community will contain both residential and commercial uses. The community will be linked by an efficient road system, multi-purpose trails and sidewalks. Land Use Residential The land included within the Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan (WJELUP) represents a transitional area between the City of Winchester and the rural areas of western Frederick County. The WJELUP area is distinguished by its pristine environmental resources and prime farmland soils and has, therefore, historically supported both agricultural and low density residential land uses. Adjoining land within the City of Winchester has developed extensively with urban and suburban residential uses, most notably within the Meadow Branch, Morlyn Hills, Meadow Branch South, and Orchard Hill subdivisions. Additionally, suburban residential land use has been established within the UDA adjacent and north of the WJELUP area through the Merriman's Chase subdivision. The predominant land uses envisioned within the WJELUP area are urban and suburban residential uses. The residential designation is intended to continue the established land use pattern in the vicinity of the WJELUP area. As such, new residential development within the WJELUP area is expected to consist primarily of single family detached and single family small lot units, and be compatible with the design of existing residential uses on adjoining property. The gross residential density for residential developments within the WJELUP area should not exceed four dwelling units per acre. Commercial This plan calls for commercial uses to balance, service and complement the residential uses. Areas for commercial land use are designated along the planned route of the Jubal Early Drive extension and near the intersection of Cedar Greek Grade and Route 37. These areas are intended to provide commercial services and employment opportunities that are accessible for Public Hearing Item — WJELUP November 22, 2005 residents within the WJELUP area and the adjacent community via alternative modes of transportation, such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Enhanced accessibility is anticipated through the connection of such areas to the surrounding residential neighborhoods by a network of multi-purpose trails and sidewalks. The commercial component is envisioned to consist of neighborhood scale commercial uses and high-end office uses. Priority will be given to neighborhood scale commercial uses as these will serve the needs of residents and create focal points for the new community. Strip commercial development is strongly discouraged. Consolidated entrances will be encouraged to avoid multiple -entrances along Jubal Early Drive, Cedar Creek Grade and the new collector road. Transportation Future road networks are proposed for the WJELUP area which will link it to Jubal Early Drive, Route 37 and Cedar Creek Grade (Route 622). The Win -Fred Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2030 Transportation Plan calls for the extension of Jubal Early Drive to Route 37. It calls for a new diamond interchange at Route 37 and Jubal Early Drive, with a realignment of Merrimans Lane. The extension of Jubal Early Drive and the interchange at Route 37 are critical to addressing regional transportation problems. This plan, therefore, incorporates the extension of Jubal Early Drive as an east/west through road and the construction of the interchange at Route 37. The extension of Jubal Early Drive through this portion of the UDA is envisioned as an urban divided four -lane cross-section that includes landscaped medians as well as pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The MPO Plan also calls for Cedar Creek Grade to be widened to a 4 -lane section from the city limits to Merrimans Lane, with signalized ramps at the intersection of Cedar Creek Grade and Route 37. The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan Bicycle Plan also identifies Cedar Creek Grade as a short-term destination route. Therefore, this plan incorporates improvements to Cedar Creek Grade, to a four lane divided highway with a bicycle lane, and improvements to the interchange at Route 37 and Cedar Creek Grade. A major collector road, as included in the MPO Plan, is planned to facilitate traffic movement in a north -south direction to provide a connection between Jubal Early Drive and Cedar Creek Grade. This road is envisioned as an urban divided four -lane cross-section that includes landscaped medians as well as pedestrian and bicycle facilities. The location shown on the plan is general with the precise location of the north -south collector road remaining flexible. The development of new road systems, including a new interchange at Route 37, new signalization and improvements to existing road systems are all elements of this plan. It will be the responsibility of private property owners and developers to ensure that these improvements are made. The financial responsibility will rest primarily with private property owners and developers, although they may be able to demonstrate how a partnership, possibly with the -2- Public Hearing Item — WJELUP November 22, 2005 Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), the City and/or the County will accomplish the necessary road improvements. No rezonings should be approved until the County is certain that the transportation impacts of development will be mitigated. Another critical transportation component of the WJELUP is alternative modes of transportation, such as pedestrian and bicycle facilities. This plan, therefore, calls for an interconnected system of multi-purpose trails and sidewalks. The County should also encourage the extension of existing bus routes to serve the area. Ideally bus stops will be located at the commercial centers and within the development. Environment The WJELUP designates environmental resources associated with the Abrams Creek corridor as Developmentally Sensitive Areas (DSA). These areas should be preserved through the development process with improvements limited to required road crossings and passive recreational amenities. A large sinkhole in the area has been filled and improvements to this area may also need to be restricted to required road crossings and passive recreational amenities. A conservation oriented approach to the design of residential and commercial projects within the WJELUP area is encouraged to maximize DSA preservation. As such, the precise study and identification of DSA designated resources should occur as a critical first step in the design process for all development in the WJELUP area. Completion of this resource inventory and the delineation of preservation areas are to be followed and accommodated by layouts and engineering for building sites, lots, drainage and infrastructure. Full gross density credit will be provided for DSA designated land conserved through the development process. A portion of the Green Circle Trail, as developed by the City of Winchester, has been constructed on the north side of the Winchester -Western Railroad. The WJELUP envisions completion of this portion of the trail to Merriman's Lane. Additionally, a connector trail should be developed that extends from the existing trail to Cedar Creek Grade as an enhancement to the Green Circle Trail. The connecting trail should be located to enhance the interaction of the user with any environmental features or view sheds that are conserved through implementation of the WJELUP. The pedestrian/bicycle network developed in the WJELUP area should provide for a continuous flow from the Green Circle. Historical Resources Two known historic houses are located within the WJELUP area. The Baker, Jacob House (750 House) is located in the northwestern corner. The Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) had determined that the Baker, Jacob House is eligible for the Virginia Landmarks Register and the State and National Register of Historic Places. Protection of this building is strongly encouraged. -3- Public Hearing Item — WJELUP November 22, 2005 One potentially significant historic structure is located in the southwestern corner of the WJELUP area. The house is identified in the Lake's Atlas of 1885 as the Stuart Brown House, and has been identified as a potentially significant property in the Frederick County Rural Landmarks Survey (#34-1239). Protection of this structure is also encouraged. Education/Public Facilities The WJELUP area contains over 600 acres and the majority of this land is envisioned to be developed for residential uses. It is estimated that up to 2,400 dwellings could be built in the study area. This could generate up to 1,680 new students for the Frederick County School System. This number of students concentrated in such a small area is unprecedented in the western part of Frederick County. It will be incumbent upon future development within the WJELUP area to provide a site for school facilities, to mitigate the impact of the large number of school children resulting from development in the WJELUP area. This is consistent with the Community Facilities and Services policies in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Any school should be sited centrally within the study area to enable the maximum number of students to walk or bike to school. Schools quickly become the focus of a new community when they are at the center of the community. The final location and alignment of any school site should remain flexible to ensure that it conforms to final engineering studies and School Board considerations. It may also be necessary to provide other public facilities in this area to serve this new development. It would then be necessary for future development to provide a site for other public facilities to mitigate the impact of the large number of residents resulting from development in this area. Parks The WJELUP area should contain a well defined park and open space system for both active and passive recreation. Central to this open space will be the Abrams Creek corridor which should be preserved as a developmentally sensitive area. Neighborhood parks should also be located within the study area. As defined in the Comprehensive Policy Plan, neighborhood parks provide limited types of recreation for the entire family within easy walking distance. Examples of potential facilities in a neighborhood park include a playground, a swimming pool and tennis courts. The neighborhood parks should be located near the school and or neighborhood center and away from major streets. Also part of the park network will be the interconnected trail system as described above. -4- J,\ 7x" Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan November 2005 Map Features • @ Proposed •'be UDA/SWSA A/ Winchester City Boundary / Parcels Streams Lakes/Ponds/Wetlands Planned Transportation Road ROW IVMajor Collector A/ Railroads Proposed Trails Future Interchange Planned Land Use Developmentally Sensitive Commercial Residential 0 375 750 1,500 Feet Created by sa Frederick County Planning November 23, 2005 DRAFT C • • MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #11-05 WESTBURY COMMONS Staff Report for the Planning Commission Public Meeting Prepared: November 14, 2005 Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins — Planner 11 This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. LOCATION: The property fronts on the east side of Westminster -Canterbury Drive (Route 1318), approximately 1,000 feet south of the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 53-4-3-E, 53-4-3-F PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Unimproved ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North: Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 11/02/05 Tabled Planning Commission: 12/07/05 Pending Board of Supervisors: 12/14/05 Pending LOCATION: The property fronts on the east side of Westminster -Canterbury Drive (Route 1318), approximately 1,000 feet south of the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 53-4-3-E, 53-4-3-F PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Unimproved ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES: North: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential & B2 (Business General) Use: Commercial South: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential East: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential West: B2 (Business General) Use: Commercial PROPOSED USE: 11 age -restricted single family small lot detached dwellings MDP #11-05, Westbury Commons November 14, 2005 Page 2 REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The Master Development Plan for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 1318, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. The Master Development Plan is acceptable to VDOT. Before making any final comments, this office will require a complete set of site plans, drainage calculations and traffic flow data from the I.T.E. Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition for review. VDOT reserves the right to comment on all right-of-way needs, including right-of-way dedications, traffic signalization, and off site roadway improvements and drainage. Prior to construction on the State's right-of-way the developer will need to apply to this office for issuance of appropriate permits to cover said work. Frederick County Fire Marshal: Plans approved as submitted. Frederick County Public Works: Some off site drainage improvements may be required to accommodate point source discharge from the proposed SWM pond. Also, provisions shall be made to accommodate or route storm flows from the SWM pond located immediately south of the proposed development issues can be resolved during the subdivision design phase. Frederick County Sanitation Authoritv: 1 st review — approved. Frederick County Inspections Department: No comment required at this time. Shall comment at the subdivision review. Geographic Information Systems (GIS): Westbury Place has been entered into the Frederick County Road name system. Frederick County Department of Parks and Recreation: Plan appears to meet open space requirements and, along with the proffered trail system, offers appropriate recreational amenities equivalent to the prorated value of the required recreational unit. Planning & Zoning: A) Master Development Plan Requirement A master development plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a master development plan can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the master development plan conforms to all requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the master development plan is to promote orderly and planned development of property within Frederick County that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best interest of the general public. MDP #11-05, Westbury Commons November 14, 2005 Page 3 B) Location The property fronts on the east side of Westminster -Canterbury Drive (Route 1318), approximately 1,000 feet south of the intersection of North Frederick Pike (Route 522). C) Site History The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) depicts the zoning of the subject parcel as B-2 (Business General) District. This property was rezoned from B2 (Business General) to RP (Residential Performance) with proffers on February 9, 2005. D) Intended Use 11 age -restricted single family small lot detached dwellings E) Site Suitability & Project Scope Comprehensive Policy Plan: The Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County. [Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 1-I] Land Use The Urban Development Area (UDA) is the principal land use tool of the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. The general purpose of the UDA is to define the areas in the county where more intensive forms of residential development will occur. It does this by dividing the County into rural and urban areas. The UDA was originally created with the intent that it would be adequate enough to accommodate long term growth needs in areas of the County where public services are most available. (Comprehensive Policy Plan, p. 6-1, 6-2) The subject property is located entirely within the UDA. In accordance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan, "any new suburban residential development served by sewer and water will have to be located within the UDA." Environment No flood plains, lakes or ponds, wetlands, sinkholes, steep slopes, or other environmental features have been identified on the 3.13 acre site. The General Soil Map of the Soil Survey of Frederick County Virjzinia indicates that the soils comprising the subject parcel fall under the Frederick-Poplimento Loams soil association 0 413 & 17C). MDP #11-05, Westbury Commons November 14, 2005 Page 4 Transportation: The subject site is currently accessible via Westminster -Canterbury Drive (Route 1318). The Westbury Commons development will contain a private road that will serve the I 1 lot subdivision. This private road will be accessed off of Westminster -Canterbury Drive which intersects with North Frederick Pike (Route 522) at a median crossing. Proffer Statement The following list is a summary of the proffered conditions accepted with the approval of Rezoning #13-04 (Westbury Commons) rezoning application: • The property will be developed in conformance with the Generalized Development Plan submitted with the rezoning package. • Contribution of $1,000 per lot to lessen the impacts on capital facilities. • Assurance that the site will be developed to accommodate no more than 11 age -restricted single family detached dwelling units with a minimum of 6,000 square feet per lot. • The site will be served by a private street that meets the public street requirements utilized by VDOT and that the Homeowners Association will be responsible for the maintenance. • A five foot wide asphalt pedestrian trail system will be constructed throughout the project, with connections to the center commons and community center. • Community common open space will be provided in the center and northwest quadrant of the property, as well as around the perimeter of the site. • A Category B full screen buffer along the portion of the northern property line adjacent to the existing B2 zoned parcel. • The applicant will provide a twenty-five (25) foot landscaped buffer along the western project property line, adjoining Westminster -Canterbury Drive. F) Waivers Pursuant to § 165-64A(1), of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, the Board of Supervisors may provide a waiver for the community center requirement specified in §165-64A in single-family small lot subdivisions that contain less than 50 lots. Section 165-64A of the Zoning Ordinance states that "developments containing single-family small lot housing shall provide a community center that provides for the equivalent of three age appropriate recreational units for each 30 dwellings". Pursuant to the waiver requirement, the applicant is required to demonstrate how an equivalent recreational value of three recreational units for each 30 dwellings is being provided within the project, to the County, or a combination of both as a condition of requesting approval of a waiver by the Board of Supervisors. The applicant is providing the following: • 14' Gazebo (price: $27,645) • Two Park Benches (price: $1,142) — proffered during rezoning 0 Trails (price: $47,120) — proffered during rezoning MDP #11-05, Westbury Commons November 14, 2005 Page 5 At a prorated amount the development will require $27,500 for the community center value. This value may be revised to reflect a recreational unit value at the time of subdivision platting. The applicant is providing a total of $75,907 (including proffered amenities) in recreational units as stated on sheet 3 of the MDP. Attached is a picture of the gazebo and park benches that the applicant is proposing in the development. Staff is seeking a recommendation from the Planning Commission regarding this waiver to forward to the Board of Supervisors. PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY & ACTION OF THE 11/02/05 MEETING: The staff noted that the applicant had submitted a revised master development plan (MDP) which addressed all of the issues identified in the staff's report; however, this revised plan was not received until after the Commission's agenda had been mailed. A Commissioner inquired as to whether the Parks & Recreation Department was satisfied that the applicant's proposal of a gazebo, two park benches, and trails met the required equivalent recreational value of a community center. Staff replied that the Parks & Recreation Department had already submitted their approval and was satisfied with the exchange for this type of community. Using the overhead screen, the applicant pointed out the revisions to the plan. In response to the Commission's request for a description of the stormwater management details, the applicant replied that the County Engineer requested that the applicant consider assisting with the existing stormwater pond on the Canterbury Square property and to have the stormwater management designed to encapsulate the entire area. The applicant stated that they have complied with that request and the resulting plan was designed so the post -development storm outlet will be less than the pre -development conditions; he added that their design will create a better stormwater drainage system than what is there presently. Noting that the trail system accessed what appeared to be private driveways in three separate locations, a Commission member asked if those areas would be provided with public access easements. The applicant replied that they have made that provision. There were no public comments. Although it appeared all of the issues had been addressed, a Commissioner moved to table the MDP until such time as a revised MDP could be provided to the Commission in their agenda packets for their review. It was pointed out that receiving changes to plans on the evening of a Planning Commission meeting does not allow sufficient time for review by the members; other Commissioners agreed. The motion to table was seconded and passed by a majority vote, as follows: YES (TO TABLE): Wilmot, Manuel, Triplett, Kriz, Ours, Gochenour, Straub NO: Thomas, DeHaven, Morris, Unger, Watt MDP #11-05, Westbury Commons November 14, 2005 Page 6 (Note: All Commission members were present at the meeting.) STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 12/07/05 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This master development plan (MDP) application is for eleven proffered age -restricted single family detached dwelling units (minimum 6,000sf lots) in the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District. Upon resolution of the recreational center waiver this Master Development Plan will be consistent with the requirements of Article XVII, Master Development Plan, of the Zoning Ordinance. The preliminary master development plan is also in accordance with the proffers of the rezoning and has addressed staff's concerns. All of the issues identified by the Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed prior to a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. Following the Planning Commission discussion, it would be appropriate to forward a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding this MDP conformance with County codes and review agency comments. All issues and concerns raised by the Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors for their consideration. MOUNTAINEER, SERIES , double -pedestal bench for extra strength Redwood in its design. Its versatility and with Redwood makes it vandal resistant and length is made with the same high comfort makes the double -pedestal bench and aesthetically pleasing. standards of IMF's pedestal tables, and perfect for any mall, recreation or sports incorporates old growth Clear All Heart area. Permanently installed and appointed Specify Iron Mountain Forge MODEL 280 PEDESTAL PARK BENCH Overall dimensions shalt be 34" high x 22" deepx 6' long. Average seat height above ground shall be 18". Pedestal park bench frames shall have a vertical 4" x 4" x 36-1/2" square steel post embedded in concrete. Horizontal frame components shall befabricated from 2-1/2"x 2-1/2" x 48" square steel tubing and shall be electrically welded to vertical post. Seat and back supports shall be made from two 3/8" x 4" x 31-3/4" steel flats bent a total of 75° on minimum radius. Frame shall be welded such that seat shall slant down toward back at 5 degrees from horizontal. Caps shall be electrically welded to ends of all open tubing. Finish shall be electrostatically applied black dry powder. Seats and backs shall be S4S Construction Heart Redwood. Seat and back shall consist of eight planks measuring 3'x 4'x 6'. All planks shall have all edges eased to a 3/8" radius. All bolt holes shall be precision drilled for easy field assembly. Sixteen zinc plated carriage bolts and nuts shall be used in attaching the before mentioned planks with frames. Optional lumber shall be 3" x4" x 6' Clear All Heart Redwood. For additional lumber characteristics, please refer to pages 44-46. MOUNTAINEER SERIES 280-6XP Park Bench, stationary, single leg, 6' long, 135 lbs. painted black, construction heart redwood seat and back 280-6XR Park Bench, stationary, single leg, 6' long, 135 lbs. painted black, clear all heart redwood seat and back -6XP Park Bench, stationary, double leg, 6' long, 135 lbs. painted black, construction heart redwood seat and back 281-6XR Park Bench, stationary, double leg, 6' long, 135 lbs. painted black, clear all heart redwood seat and back 281-BXP Park Bench, stationary, double leg, 8' long, 160 lbs. painted black, construction heart redwood seat and back 281-8XR Park Bench, stationary, double leg, 8' long, 160 lbs. painted black, clear all heart redwood seat and back 282-6XP Park Bench, stationary, double leg portable, 6' 135 lbs. long, painted black, construction heart redwood seat and back 282-6XR Park Bench, stationary, double leg portable, 6' 135 lbs. long, painted black, clear all heart redwood seat and back 1 t3 `.. 'Ail- r •� ' - l4,in 4rx" rte^ tom', VII_K �• I � �' � � ^ i � `' S d' tom, L fi _ y � r • o' � i hY e5'tiz.�. y -'r.. n � } y 4 ;71MIL 1 t3 `.. 'Ail- r •� ' - l4,in 4rx" rte^ tom', y.JgC("IT \ m.-.. UNGER Ip 1 . -7PROPERTLIS - .. 53A A 6 MP '53A; 2C C ro, n� f� r 74 Zoning SUNNYSIDESJ 7p B2 53 - Zoning HARVEST COMMUNITIES t J SJ CgRT Np t RP 53 43 E k q ICER sJq Z'H4* �z OO�N A9 55 P ODONNESg 53 p RESN1CXpNDER50N 530 2 52 531, 2B3 aIFsJgK1PPs ze Pq v S NN o` sJq FsrD 4 H1 /` , o C -138 19 4 �; s3N/pOyNs NOC h iy Jq NFSTO I C C S q D sJq qF ZB s¢� e MCGAHA cQJiy 5384 13 rp" Q h 7p 11 SJq Z�qN ITS s NOO 3 O8 JgIBN S S34 ZN441, 6 Jq 53AOZ LE B 4 _ SJgeFgy Zp .Buildings Road Centerlines 7 S HE (Higher Education District) Q RP (Residential Performance District) © M1 (Indus4ial, Light District) SJgP�gCF NOC O Parcels \i Trails Q M2 (Industrial, General District) N IC 17 sJq z M'yN cJ 0 50 100 HARVEST COMMUNITIES 53 43 F N SJq 141 µ e S S sJq ICS�J S4plCdr2 a `'7«'? s✓q BF'gN SJgrjO1TS 144 4 BUTLER 9 RDDRY I "0!'44 O C5384 sJq ? *4 sJqST? CMs qMO7 4'k 538 9 a _ SM sq m y s 40 sJq I CIS S� MZeN s SJgNI<<1Ps 04 6 .?c CA- sJq TFs P 4 H1 16 7C O' SJ4-16,/Ps -138 19 U o - 05 I S � h h iy Jq NFSTO I C C S q D sJq qF ZB s¢� e MCGAHA cQJiy 5384 13 rp" Q h '' " SQ/TNFSTOC GAREY 53B 4 5 lTK 7C 1SK ITS s NOO 3 O8 JgIBN S S34 ZN441, 6 Jq 53AOZ LE B 4 Map Features Zoning Application ^Z Bridges MDP # 11 - 05 Culverts V B1 (Business, Neighborhood District) rO MS (Medical Support District) Lekes/Ponds ^� Dams L J Q B2 (Business, General District) Q R4 (Residential, Planned Community District)Westbury Commons Streams ^1 Retaining Walls B3 (Business, Industrial Transition District) �+ R5 (Residential Recreational Community District) .Buildings Road Centerlines EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) Q RA( Rural Areas District) Tanks-,"' HE (Higher Education District) Q RP (Residential Performance District) © M1 (Indus4ial, Light District) _ _ _ (53 4 3 E, F ) O Parcels \i Trails Q M2 (Industrial, General District) N ♦ / uoA N Q MHi (Mobile Home Community District) 0 50 100 200 _SA µ e S Feet APPLICATION M 9 - 6 2n MASTER DE117ELOPMENT PLAN 1. Project Title: Westbury Commons 2. Owner's Name Harvest Communities, Inc. 147 Creekside Lane Winchester, VA 22602 (Please list name of all owners or parties in interest) 3. Applicant: Greenway Engineering Address: 151 Windy Hill Lane Winchester, VA 22602 Phone Number: 662-4185 4. Design Greenway Engineering Company: Address: Same Phone Number: Same Contact Name: Evan Wyatt 5. Location of Property Eastside of Westminster Canterbury Drive, approximately 500' south of the intersection of Route 522 and Westminster Canterbury Drive 6. Total Acreage: 3.13 acres 7. Property Information a) Property Identification Number (PIN): b) Current Zoning: c) Present Use: d) Proposed Uses: e) Adjoining Property Information: 53-4-3-E, 53-4-3-F RP Unimproved Detached Single -Family Small Lot f) Magisterial District: Property Uses 132 -Commerical, Residential Residential, Common Area Residential B2 -Commercial Stonewall 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: L , Date: 5I Property Identification Numbers North 53-4-3-D-1, 53A -A-6 South 5313-4-9, 53B-4-8, 5313-4-7, 53B -4-20A East 53A -2-D-9. 53A -2-D-8, 53A -2-D-7, 53A -2-D-6, 53A -2-D-5, 53A -2-D-4, 53A -2-D-3 West 53 -A -52E f) Magisterial District: Property Uses 132 -Commerical, Residential Residential, Common Area Residential B2 -Commercial Stonewall 8. Is this an original or amended Master Development Plan? Original ® Amended ❑ I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Department of Planning and Development. I also understand that the master development plan shall include all contiguous land under single or common ownership. All required material will be complete prior to the submission of my master development plan application. Signature: L , Date: 5I Adjoining Property Owners MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public right-of-way, a private right-of-way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the parcel identification number, which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the I st floor of the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street. NAME ADDRESS / PROPERTY NUMBER H.K. Benham III and James T. Anderson PO Box 368 Winchester, VA 22604 PIN: 53 -A -52E Upper Crust, LLC 112A Bruce Drive Winchester, VA 22601 PIN: 53-4-3-D-1 Vernon B. and Frances A. Unger 5179 Barley Drive Stephens City, VA 22655 PIN: 53A -A-6 Almira L. Kipps 106 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-3 Almira L. Kipps 106 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-4 Betty Lou R. Bean 112 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-5 Betty Lou R. Bean 112 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-6 Betty Lou R. Bean 112 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-7 Thomas J. Place 116 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-8 Thomas J. Place 116 Hickory Lane Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 53A -2-D-9 North Frederick Realty PO Box 2800 Winchester, VA 22604 PIN: 538-4-20A Jeremy P. and Holly L. Buck 105 Rugby Place Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 5313-4-7 Edward H. and Gertrude H. Corddry 103 Rugby Place Winchester, VA 22603 PIN: 5313-4-8 Steven G. Butler PO Box 2097 Winchester, VA 22604 PIN: 5313-4-9 Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.co.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Planning office, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 Facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By These Presents: That I (We) (Name) Stuart Butler, President -Harvest Communities, Inc. (Phone) (540) 678-1462 (Address) 147 Creekside Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 the owner(s) of all those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (us), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. 040019971 on Page Instrument No. 040019972 on Page and is described as Parcel: 53 Lot: E_ Block: 4 Section: 3 Subdivision: Parcel: 53 Lot: _F Block: 4 Section: 3 Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Greenway En ineering (Phone) (540) 662-4185 (Address) 151 Windy Hill Lane, Winchester, VA 22602 To act as my true and lawful attorney-in-fact for and in my (our) name, place and stead with full power and authority I (we) would have if acting personally to file planning application for my (our) above described Property, including: ❑ Rezoning (Including proffers) ❑ Conditional Use Permits ® Master Development Plan (Preliminary and Final) ❑ Subdivision ❑ Site Plan ❑ Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment My attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. In witness thereof, I Signature(s) and sea] thi� I Oth day of October, 2005 State of Virginia, City Countyvf Frederick, To -wit: I, Donna L. Meliso, a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction aforesaid, certify that the person(s) who signed to the foregoing instrument and who I (are) known to me, personally appeared before me and has ackn edged the same,,,before mein the jurisdiction aforesaid this 10th day of October, 2005. I, e71i'l iL ` •-1 G�Lt."` My Commission F.xnirevr FPhrnary ?9 ?f)nR Notary Public COUNTY of IFREDERICK Department of Panning and Development 54.0/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6P5 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Candice E. Perkins, Planner I1 &� RE: Request of Exception — Gas Mart # 7 — Berryville Pike DATE: November 16, 2005 Staff has received a waiver request from Keith Engineering, Inc., to allow for the reduction in entrance spacing for new driveways on Arterial Highways to allow a new cornivercial entrance to be placed less than 200 feet from an existing commercial entrance (7-11 Entrance) and Eckard Circle (a private road). A copy of the new entrance and the existing entrances has been included for your information, along with an aerial and a photograph of the site. The zoning ordinance §165-29A(4) specifies that the minimum spacing between driveways and intersections shall be 200 feet for a posted speed limit of more than 35mph. In accordance with Section 165-29B(1), the Planning Commission may allow other means of motor vehicle access which do not meet the requirements set forth in 165-29. The properties are located at the corner of Berryville Pike (Route 7) and Eckard Circle (private) and are zoned B2 (Business General). The approval of this waiver will allow this property to develop a gas station use with a right-in/right-out onto Berryville Pike. The copy of the site plan included in your package shows the proposed entrance location. The applicant would need a waiver of 125' off of Eckard Circle and a waiver of 75' off of the adjacent commercial entrance. This waiver would place the new entrance 75' off of Eckard Circle and 125" off of the existing entrance to the 7-11. The Planning Commission should determine if they believe the waiver is appropriate in this case. Please contact our department if you need additional information. Attachments CEP/bad 107 Forth Kent ,street, ;quite 202 o Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Zoning M2 g o � � z yQ W Q SILVER LAKE 55B 21 A r n n KETRON 55B 21 1 GRONDIN SSB 21 3 611 2N1 / S TIMBROOK 55B 21 7 HURT SSB 21 9 ` AYCOCK 556 21 2 KLINE 558 21 4 BELL 55B 21 6 ERIN 55B 21 8 / CHAN MBC / 55 A 24 55 A 25 Zoning DOWNING plication /N/ Bridges HODGSON Waiver Waiver Request /� Culverts 558 A 77 556 A 16 i �> B2 (Business, General District) J R4 (Residential, Planned Community District) .r,^.-... Streams f� Retaining walls -t I T Buildings Road Centerlines 4 EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) O RA (Rural Areas District) Tanks ^' MBC O ( 55 - A 35, 36, 37 aouLos it ^ I 55 A 26A o° Zoning a ming MBC 55B A 2 a m I BILAEY4 i i RPSMITH B2 55 A 31 s Feet r 5 m N 55B A 6 Zoning M2 g o � � z yQ W Q SILVER LAKE 55B 21 A r n n KETRON 55B 21 1 GRONDIN SSB 21 3 611 2N1 / S TIMBROOK 55B 21 7 HURT SSB 21 9 ` AYCOCK 556 21 2 KLINE 558 21 4 BELL 55B 21 6 ERIN 55B 21 8 / CHAN MBC / 55 A 24 55 A 25 CARINELLI 55B 32 31 HAYES 55B 32 33 MARKS 55B 32 35A Map Features Zoning DOWNING plication /N/ Bridges Waiver Waiver Request /� Culverts 558 A 77 Lakes/Ponds ^� Dams �> B2 (Business, General District) J R4 (Residential, Planned Community District) .r,^.-... Streams f� Retaining walls -t Gas Mart #7 Buildings Road Centerlines 4 EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) O RA (Rural Areas District) Tanks ^' *1 HE(Higher 1,LighonDirict) Q RP (Residential Performance District) �� M1 (Industrial, Light District) ( 55 - A 35, 36, 37 L:i, Parcels �. Trails I C I swsA JDA C� MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) 0 25 50 C w E 100 s Feet yN =h i f y I m h Svhi CARINELLI 55B 32 31 HAYES 55B 32 33 MARKS 55B 32 35A Map Features Zoning plication /N/ Bridges Waiver Waiver Request /� Culverts ' B1 (Business, Neighborhood District) * MS (Medical Support District)) Lakes/Ponds ^� Dams �> B2 (Business, General District) J R4 (Residential, Planned Community District) .r,^.-... Streams f� Retaining walls � usi B3 (Bness, Industrial Transition District) * R5 (Residential Recreational Community Distnct) Gas Mart #7 Buildings Road Centerlines 4 EM (Extractive Manufacturing District) O RA (Rural Areas District) Tanks ^' *1 HE(Higher 1,LighonDirict) Q RP (Residential Performance District) �� M1 (Industrial, Light District) ( 55 - A 35, 36, 37 L:i, Parcels �. Trails �;• M2 (Industrial, General District) N swsA JDA C� MH1 (Mobile Home Community District) 0 25 50 ��� w E 100 s Feet H sB�3RSGN Z S1 "1 SS8G3FNFR.,.... HILLER 558 32 so STOP SIGN, (vj ccpf C44 URB CUT END EXISTING ....'.•.'.'.•.•. .1 PROPOSED •'•"• I ..::. EP \_,1 TOP OF PW ELEV 680. 0 0. PROPOSEl7 I srnizi-i . STOP SIG 1 CURB*' C&G '. • NEW so.00°.:p R/W ml ITYp 8---{ N --,_ THERMA PLASTIC 'GRASS ► STOP BAR AREA I , I A p� 0 I 5'r1ED I I Q W 0 00 i REMOVE 0 � 0 Proposed OffRoed Diesel Disperser I r Dr. BECAW fl LJ L --J REIyp ® I � w a 3 PROPOSED Q " ain 1 c CANOPY Q �' Venis + a ri ASPHAULT m 5,753 14' F PAVING oo� i m8Lu o , TYP 3 d r rep I ,T PAC�-' 1 i ARGR�ss Kerosene 4ro, m r3Ispr--- 4� � B 7' EASEMENT TO ISE DEDICATED s TO J/w i TYP J HERMA P HC IC g STOyBAR ! I GG -9D CONCI cNTRANCE DUMPSTER PAD I & ENCLOSURE--, 6Z wi � RETAINING F. 55-(A)-34 HF DIFW1 OF1;PFNSFR IS TO PROVIDF FI1FI FOR MBC• LC• IS -,,NG BM 81.3 _ V9 NOPY HANGS OVER f POLES TO BE RELOCATED "w V9 AND/OR REPLACED }Oa9t I 23 E -J I d© Ex Ho Proposed i J TO BE RE D4535 SgFt I .00' Q a 1 I Convenience I © g �+ W fl -- EF— 5d-1— J -2'G AREA STORE HT 12' � Q A o1 ` D r RETAINING �• WALL ad !{ � � � N 6 moo. S�!TE PLAN a, ASPHAULT PAVING 25, Yj I• AS MART % UILDING N I SIGN 13UFFER25' RESTRICTION UNE v o N DRIVEWAY' Ffm OWN ARE I in 0 FOR NNECTIONSTO UNDER ROUND TANKS r•-•--- +1 Dispenser I I r A I 5'r1ED I I Q W 0 00 i REMOVE 0 � 0 Proposed OffRoed Diesel Disperser I r Dr. BECAW fl LJ L --J REIyp ® I � w a 3 PROPOSED Q " ain 1 c CANOPY Q �' Venis + a ri ASPHAULT m 5,753 14' F PAVING oo� i m8Lu o , TYP 3 d r rep I ,T PAC�-' 1 i ARGR�ss Kerosene 4ro, m r3Ispr--- 4� � B 7' EASEMENT TO ISE DEDICATED s TO J/w i TYP J HERMA P HC IC g STOyBAR ! I GG -9D CONCI cNTRANCE DUMPSTER PAD I & ENCLOSURE--, 6Z wi � RETAINING F. 55-(A)-34 HF DIFW1 OF1;PFNSFR IS TO PROVIDF FI1FI FOR MBC• LC• REI V PR FEN1 NOPY HANGS OVER W 3 B THERE IS NO N W/ BUILDING IN DO 7 -J I d© Ex Ho Proposed i J TO BE RE D4535 SgFt I .00' Q a 1 I Convenience I © g F--7 Store IL fl -- EF— 5d-1— J STORE HT 12' � A o1 D CA) VJ O Q 1.315 Acres Nse ls'oo IJ(/ ALL DEVELOPED) Tj S�!TE PLAN a, REI V PR FEN1 Sep 08 05 10:2Ba J Keith 8047843669 P. O. BOX 113 (804) 784-3633 CROZIER, VA 23039 FAX (804) 784-3669 DATE; '9!08105 TO: County of Fredrick 107 N. Kent Street,. suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601 Attn Candice E. Perkins, Planner II RE: Proposed Convenience Store Route 7 and Eckard Circle Winchester, Virginia Dear Candice, FILE-fredrick col Phone 540-665-5651 Fax 540-665-6395 We are planning to file a site plan application for the referenced project on 9/9/05 In accordance with our discussions with you, We are hereby requesting a variance from The Planning Commission to permit the existing and proposed entrance to used on the new convenience store which is to be less than 200 feet from existing entrances We will provide you with our Drawings on the referenced project along with the Site Plan Application If you have any questions, please contact me Sincerely, F. J. Keith, P. E. President P.1 * Pro PC scci $p ; 119 F�ciweer► &4wf&nc"s ,CES LOW ARROW InPI 55B -(A)-6 SMITH, JOSEPH C. 1811 BERRYVILLE PIKE 4.96 AC. DITCH (TYP a ^� EX E N� �O Q, P SED z ARE a LOQ STD RI -1 STOP SIG 1 991 \^� 'ING, ✓� N � CURB CUT p•�_ THERMA PLASTIC 2' GRASS ITYPh1,i I STOP BAR l'I<tJ['U1tD \�ON END 5 G BM EXISTING 81.3 \ CG -6 XISTING UTILITY—fro `y POLES TO BE RELOCATED wl AND/OR REPLACED ,Og92 ii EX N853. 333 �^J s G 2' GRP ART INC. `5 C� :...,I AREA PIKE 22603 2622i ::•:•:•:•:•;•:... •� 1 PROPOSED��jj• • • I .-KZ ROAD I c11 C •r ti E 0 "Vn 3 Ovv av I w �fl 3 vo w / w OF RETAINING O w v WALL �,�I N C / w FS / ASPHAULT w N PAVING 25 25' w y° r i m rnnic; BUFFER 11 55B -(2)-1-A SILVER LAKE, LU #020016785 ZONED: B-2 USE: RETAIL Sas Mart 7 SL-bject: Gas Mart 7 From: "Ingram, Lloyd"<Lloyd.Ingram@VDOT.Virginia.gov> Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:40:18 -0500 To. 'Candice Perkins' <cperkins@co.frederick.va.us> GC: 'Fred Robinson' <frobinson@j ones -frank. com> Candice, I have reviewed the proposed site plan for the Gas Mart on Route 7. It appears to meet our general criteria and other than a few minor items to be addressed, the plan should then be approved. If you have any questions, please contact me. Thanks, Lloyd A. Ingram Transportation Engineer VDOT — Edinburg Residency Land Development 14031 Old Valley Pike Edinburg, VA 22824 (540) 984-5611 (540) 984-5607 (fax) of 1 11/14/20005 3:18 PA4 T-360 P-002/002 Fe916 10-'0,2009 '2:17 Prom® 11", . �rnralt At $adc� Home and Bu iress Developmenrt office - Srorea 13 South Loudoui Stmet 1�pnr�me+esa - &Ivdn�v �8sis:hC�t�i', �1i6piofsa �.Z�� ! t�4rpeltsissciv Home & fifigbiesf .91m Office: (540) f.62 -9235, - October 19, 2005 C dire Ea NAMES Dem calt ar Planning & Deveir- rill -M IOl N_ shut Me 202 iIV7jar_hc t-, VA 22601 Flew M5, PeEk& g.* I bra seat iutermtead In h&v3ng a reght-mf way rca„Osd;d through mY gr€ Pcv?Y, Of .qharc anen ,g %iih pmpowd rias M locewd to thu west of the �-3 2 on W, #7 area cavd-hrl Dr ve. Sincetty, q 7� 4'i�yt�ijLAKE, LLC l RjcWc Wilkins M aneg" C: • • SUBDIVISION REQUEST # 22-05 LAKE HOLIDAY, SECTION 10 w. Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: (November 17, 2005 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planing Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in tke review of this application. t nay also he useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 12/07/05 Pending Board of Supervisors: 01/11/06 Pending LOCATION: Along Master Drive within Section 10, Lake Holiday MAGISTERIAL, DISTPJCT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUM BERS: 18 -A -J PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENTUSE: R-5 (Residential Recreational Community) District Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING P'ROPEq'TV ZGNING &- USE: North: Zone R-5 Use: Residential South: Zone R-5 Use Residential/Golf Course East: Zone R-5 Use Residential West. Zone R-5 Use Residential SUBDIVISION SPECIFICS: Subdivision of 3.35 acres into 14 single family detached traditional houses. Subdivision Application #22-05 November 17, 2605 Page 2 REVIEW AGENCY COMMENTS: N/A blic Meeting Requirement The original subdivision where this tract of land is located is known as "Lake Holiday" and does not have an approved Master Development Plan (MDP). The Subdivision Ordinance requires that land divisions in the R-5 (Residential Recreational Community) Zoning District, without an approved master development plan, be presented to the Board of Supervisors for final approval (Chapter 144-12-B). Backgreund This request is to subdivide 14 lots ranging from 10,000 square feet to 13,000 square feet in area, on 3.35 acres along Masters Drive. This 3.35 acre property had been zoned R-5 (Residential Recreational Community) when Frederick County adopted zoning in 1967. This proposed subdivision is located outside the SWSA and UDA as indicated in the 2003 Frederick County Comprehensive Polices The Subdivision Ordinance requires that land divisions within the R-5 (Residential Recreational Community) Zoning District, without an approved master development plan, be presented to the Board of Supervisors for final approval (§144-12-B). The Master Development Plan (MDP) requirement may be waived, and has been waived for this project in a letter from staff to the applicant dated February 05, 2004. This relocation of the 14 lots in Section 10 of Lake Holiday will require any new road construction, while preserving a larger open space. This proposed subdivision is on land zoned R-5 and does not contain an approved MDP; therefore, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors review and action is necessary. STAFF RECOMMENDATION FOP, 12/07/05 PLANNING COMYASKON MEETING: The proposed subdivision appears to satisfy the requirements of the zoning ordinance and subdivision ordinance. A recommendation to be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. 11 18 A 11 WHITACRE, WILLIAM LEE & JOAN F 12 18 A 12 DENNY, CHARLES 0 Map Features Subdivision Request # 22 - 05 �vlAp p lication wBridges�Paree,= Lake Holiday, Section 10 ^/ Culverts Lakes/Pond, ,ams Agrbultural8 Forestral Districts Streams ^% Retaining Walls - Debl! Cft.. t (18 — A — J ) F -- a.dmnga Road Centerlines i Cftrah N Tanks South Frederick N W* E 0 50 100 200 � I.— Trails S Feet 18 A 11 "'I r', 18 A J 11 WHITACRE, WILLIAM LEE & JOAN F / I, ��E HaLIDAY LANG= INC. Map Features Application /\/ Bridges �1 parcels /�/ culverts l � Lakes/Ponds ^V Dams AgrieulNral & FOrestrai Districts + r » Streams ^V Retaining Walls 0.,66 Gwrd1 Buildings Road Centerlines ReR�ge Ct y, N QTanks **4 0' South Frederick N W E ..�. Trolls S Subdivision Request # 22 - 05 Lake Holiday, Section 10 (18 -A -J) 0 50 100 200 Feet APPLICATION AND CHECKLIST SUBDIVISION FREDERICK COUNT', VIRGIl-Q- Date: Q pplication # �i �+ G d _ MDP? Yes v--" No If no, has MDP requirement been waived by the Planning Director? v' _-.fes ---Mo If MDP requirement has not been waived, fill in the following public hearing dates: Planning Commission: 1 f Board of Supervisors; Applicant/Agent: Address: Phone Number: 54D t7 G I Owner's Name: Address: Please list names of all owners, principals, and/or majority stockholders: Contact Person: -fo Q-Hms0" lU`cr-t� Phone Number: '5746 `'fq) -,Q 1- 1 ( NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Number of Lots: r Total Acreage: 35, Property Location: AtN6 et f �ViD106 W 1-1r-WTCW0A) 10 (Give State Route # and name, distance and direction from intersection) Magisterial District: 6APAvt540V1� 0 Property Identification Number (P.I.N.): (Parent Tract) Property zoning and present use: Adjoining property zoning and use: Has a Master Development Plan been submitted for this project? If yes, has the final MDP been approved by the Board of Supervisors? What was the Master Development Plan title? Does the plat contain any changes from the approved MDP? If yes, specify what changes: Minimum Lot Size (smallest lot): /0 s5- Nuinber and types of housing units in this development: �4 Yes�� No Yes No Yes No I have read the material included in this package and understand what is required by the Frederick County Planning Department. I also understand that all required material will be complete prior to the sqb'ssion of my site plan. Signature: �. Date: l r`wO� / u� c co SUBDIVISION WAIVER REQUEST #33-05 TITAN ` iRI 1A READY -MIX, LSC 4 i Staff Report for the Planning Commission ® Prepares:,: November 17, 2005 `Il3BStaff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of .Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It mmy also be useful.o others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Cominissian: 12/07/05 Pending Board of Supeiwiso.s: 01/11/06 Pending LOCATION: This property is located on the south side of Woodside Road (Route 671) MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Stonewall PROPER'pfY tD NUT-,11113Ef?: 33-A-133 PROPERTY Y ZONING chi PRESENT USE: EM (Extractive Manufacturing) Land Use: Concrete Plant ADJOi NlTk>lG PROPERTY ZONING &FTSE: North: RA (Rural Areas) South: EM (Extractive Manufacturing) East: M (Extractive Manufacturing) West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential Use: Water Treatment Facility Use: Water Treatment Facility Use: Vacant SUBDIVISION SPECIi;Ir' ICS: Subdivision of a 5.52 acre parcel Subdivision Application #33-05, Titan. Virginia Ready -Mix, LLC Navetrmber 17, 20€15 i age 2 Background: This request is for subdivision of a 38 acre parcel into a parcel of 5.52 acres. This 38 acre property is zoned EM (Extractive Manufacturing). This proposed subdivision is located within the SWSA and the Northeast Land Use Plan, as indicated in the 2003 Frederick County Comprehensive Policy Plan. STAFF VIEW: The Subdivision Ordinance requires that land divisions in the EM (Extractive Manufacturing) Zoning District, without an approved master development plan, be presented to the Board of Supervisors for final approval (Chapter 1 44-12-B). This proposed subdivision has approval from VDOT and the Health Department. A concrete plant which was approved by site plan in 2004 is located on this parcel; this proposed subdivision will allow the concrete plant to be secured and fee -simple with this subdivision. This proposed subdivision met the requirements for a waiver from the MDF requirements; the applicant has been granted a waiver of the MDP requirements. This project contains land zoned EM (Extractive Manufacturing) and does not have an approved MDP; therefore, Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors review and action on the Subdivision request is necessary. STAFF �:COMMENDAI'ION FOR 12/07/05 pEANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Staff is seeking administrative approval authority; therefore, a recommendation from the Planning Commission to the Board of Supervisors regarding the subdivision request is desired. COUN'T'S' of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 107 North Kent Street t) Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Telephone: 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 WAIVER/EXCEP'TIONS REQUEST APPLICATION 3. Applicant: Name: Titan Ready -Mix, LLC Telephone: (757) 858-6500 Address.- 1151 Azalea Garden Road Norfolk, VA 23502 2. Property owner (if different than above): Name: Purdon W. Frey and Telephone: (540) 665-0050 Frederick Land Company, L.C. Address: 257 E. Market Street York, PA 17403 3. Contact person (if other than, above): Name: Clifford Bocchicchio, Environmental Manager Telephone: (757) 858-6500 4. Waiver request detail's (include specific ordinance requirements to he waived): Titan Ready Mix LLC requests a waiver under Section 165-134 on the requirement for a Master Development Plan for the subdivision of the property where development of the concrete batch plant facility has already been completed. The development does not contain any new streets, roads, or right -of ways; does not propose any regional storm water management system; is not an integral portion of property planned for future development;, the propgrty has been developed in. a.manner harmonious with the surrounding properties and tauu uscs; auu We ucvctu�uteut uues nog suos[antianv arrect tne�urpose ana intent of unapter 10J o Zoning Ordinance; and Titan Ready -Mix, LLC does not control any adjacent properties. `. PropertyLocation: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers): VA Sec. Rt. 671 - Woodside Road 6. Parcel Identification/Location: Parcel Identification Number 33-A-133 Magisterial District 7. Property zoning and current use: Zoned: EM Stonewall Current Use: Vacant District 8. Attachments: Adjoining Property Owners List X Existing/recorded and Proposed Plats X OFFICE USE ONLY. Fee: $500 enclosed: Receipt 9. List of Adjoining Properties: The following names and addresses are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning properly adjacent to the property for which the waiver or exception is being sought, including properties at the sides, rear, and in front of (across street from) the subject property. (Use additional pages if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application. NAME Global Stone Chemstone Corporation Address P.O. Box 71, Strasburg, VA 22657 PropertyD # 34 -A -11A James A. and Carolyn W. Stimmell Address 3446 Old Charles Town Road, Berryville, VA 22611 Property D # 33-A-131 Glen E. and Judy S. Russell Address 2619 Woodside Road, Clearbrook, VA 22624 Property D # 33-A-87 Address Property D # Address Property Ill # Address Property D # Address Property D # Address Property D # Address Property ID # Address Property D # Address Property D # - Page 2 - 0 (� 2 1.rI .cam. v J ` 0 r• \\ J �pM ¢22 y 611 `- -,,;;— 668 pe it IV - 650 H N G E 3 C/ r'l D t) eza n le-ar )roofs' \ ��U- �. " ! .. rer =�`/ 66'7 t\1--�/,1 :' ^�� S �t `Vicinity �1 r;r Map , �rAP ROVED BY �• DATE 1 -3l- C-5. VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION J FREDERICK COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT DATE /l_ 57 — FREDERICK COUNTY SUBDIVISION ADMINISTRATO DATE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE~ The above and foregoing MINOR SUBDIVISION of the land of PURDON W. FREY and FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C., as appears in the accompanying plats, is with the free consent and in accordance with the desires of the undersigned owners, proprietors, and trustees, if any. Cihvl n F PURDON W. FRE ON ucuAIF OF-FREDERWk LAND COMPANY, C. NOTARY PUBLIC %� Y i)via 9 Commonwealth of �V ie, City/County of to �w,�' The foregoing OWNERS CERTIFICATE was acknowledged before mCO�1TvtOE7Lt)O?fP% dt' k. 2005 by PURDON W. FREY Notarial Seal Diane L- Knappe,nberger, Notary Public York Tv/p., York County NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires Oct. 6, 2007 My commission pies-- - NOTARY PUBLIC Commonwealth of Vfr&inaa; City/County of to wit: The foregoing OWNERS CE TIFICATE was acknowledged before me this U IJ -day of 1Q� 2005 by on behalf of FREDERICK LAN J)o0QM lg„J9j;'yTb-9P PENNSYLVANIA n i lrenix;l Seal titiL Diane L Knappeniielcler, Notary public NOTARY PUBL C York 7vip., York county My commissi nMLW"@§ssion Expires Oct. 6 . 2007 MINOR SUBDIVISION OF THE LAND OF OF GSC PURDON W. FREY and o��PS,TH r� FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C.�,,,� STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT P. Duane Brown FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA No. 001285 Ocf .24,20050 N 4 SURN'I-Ao� DATE: OCT. 24, 2005 COVER SHEET SHEET 1 OF 3 -. Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. A � 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET — WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 AAPHONE (540) 667-0468 — FAX (540) 667-0469 DRAWN BY: PDB EMAIL office@marshandlegge-com �, DWG NAME: ID7329SUBD , SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that the property contained in this MINOR SUBDIVISION is a portion of the property (PIN 33-A-133) that was conveyed to WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON W. FREY by deed dated December 26, 2001. By deed dated December 26, 2001, WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON W. FREY conveyed an undivided thirty-three percent (33%) 'interest to FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C. with WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON W. FREY retaining a sixty-seven percent (67%) interest. By deed dated January 14, 2002, WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON W. FREY conveyed an undivided thirty-six percent (36%) interest to FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C. with WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON Vy. FREY retaining a thirt.-one percent (,31%) interest. By deed dated December 31, 2003, WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON W. FREY conveyed an undivided eighteen percent (18%) interest to FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C. with WILLIAM S. FREY and PURDON W. FREY retaining a thirteen percent (13%) interest. By deed dated December 24, 2004, PURDON W. FREY conveyed an undivided nine percent (9%) interest to FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C. with PURDON W. FREY retaining a four percent (4%) interest. The aforementioned deeds are recorded in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Frederick County, Virginia as Instrument 010018291, Instrument 010018292, Instrument 020002262, Instrument 040000194 and Instrument 040026540, respectively. P. DUANE BROWN, L.S. NOTES: 1. NO TITLE REPORT FURNISHED. 2. EASEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. 3. PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: 33-A-133. 4. THE PROPERTY REPRESENTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED EM AND THE USE IS VACANT. 5. NO FIELD SURVEY HAS BEEN PERFORMED OR IS IMPLIED. ALL BOUNDARY INFORMATION SHOWN IS EITHER TAKEN FROM OR BASED UPON DEEDS AND PLATS OF RECORD. 6. IRON RODS ARE TO BE SET AT ALL CORNERS NOT PREVIOUSLY MONUMENTED. 7. BRL DENOTES BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE. MINOR SUBDIVISION TH Op�L, OF THE LAND OF ��, PURDON W. FREY and° '� FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C. P. Duane Brown STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT No. 001285 FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA opt z4,zoos DATE: OCT. 24, 2005 GENERAL NOTES SHEET 2 OF 3 � D SUR`!E� Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.C. 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET - WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 DRAWN BY: PDB PHONE (540) 667-0468 - FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL office@marshandlegge.com DWG NAME: ID7329SUBD CURVE TABLE CURVE DEL TA RADIUS ARC TANGENT CHORD CHORD BEARING 1 10'14'40" 1,150.00' 205.62' 103.09' 205.35' NO3'40'36"W 2 2J'21'44" 600.00' 244.65' 124.05' 242.96' NO2 52 56 E 3 10'582J" 5,759.65' 1,103.07' 553 23' 1,101.39' N27*02 357E 4 0241'55" 5,759.65' 271.29' 13567' 271.27' N31'10'49E 5 00'2951" 5,759.65' 50.00' 25.-00' 50.00' N2934 567E 6 07'4637' 5,759.65' 781.78" 39L49' 781.18' N252642E 7 00 27'41 " 2,175.00' 17.52' 8 76' 17.52' 56039 35 E 8 04'02'50" 2,175.00' 153.64' 76.85' 153.60' 55824 "19 E 9 567325" 93 00' 91-26' 49.68' 87.64' S84 29 36 E 10 9209"17" 43.00' 69.16' 44.65' 61.94' 5773228"W 11 04 30 31 " 2,225. 00' 175.09' 87.59" 175.04' N5838'09 "W LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE Ll 53127 49 "W 257.91' L2 S2350'25 "W 67.88' L3 S60 53 257E 196 37' L4 S562254E 98.71' L5 S60 53 257E 195.96' L6 S562254'E 1 98.71' L 7 S5832'1I E 25.00' L 8 S2350'25 "W 55.06' l' A0 1. VA. SEC. RT. 671 - WOODSIDE ROAD \0R�N 30' PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT CONRAIL RAILROAD 1-9 S23 50'25 "W 12.82' EX. 150' NO. VA POWER CO. ESM'T / / / PIN 33-A-133-- , DB 249 PG 223 / 33.7403 ACRES _ f (REMAINDER) GLOBAL STONE CHEMS TONE CORPORATION 9$ PIN 34-A-IlA $�•, ; (2.9541 ACRES) INSTR. 990004759 c 729.70' ZONED. EM �0 N23-4247_ E� USE. WATER TREATMENT FACILITY�.(�6 -_ _ - (R` X25' BRL 25 BRL 50' STRIP (0.6430 ACRES)- � ) EX. 40' RAILROAD ESM'T. HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE < OB 272 PG 56 / g`�_ _ - _ - 75' BRL COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA / / NEW PIN 33 -A -133A 9 5.5251 ACRES / L9- / /S31"36'25"W 282.35- S31"15'14"W 769.82' GLOBAL STONE CHEMSTONE CORPORATION PIN 34 -A -11A INS77? 990004759 ZONED: EM USE. WATER 7REAIMENT FACILITY MINOR SUBDIVISION OF THE LAND OF PURDON W. FREY and FREDERICK LAND COMPANY, L.C. STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA 200 0 200 Ilml 1111111 -ii DATE: OCT. 24, 2005 1 SCALE: 1 "=200' SHEET 3 OF 3 Marsh & Legge Land Surveyors, P.L.0 560 NORTH LOUDOUN STREET - WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA 22601 PHONE (540) 667-0468 - FAX (540) 667-0469 EMAIL office®marshandlegge.com (30.7862 ACRES) LS__ _1-7_ L2 LI �PLTH Op L f P. Duane Brown No. 001285 Oaf. 2¢ 2005 jdND SUR`IE� DRAWN BY: PDB DWG NAME: ID7329SUBD • C COUNTY of FREDERICK Departmert of Planning and Development 549/665-5651 FAX: 54-0/665-6395 MEMORANDIJAI TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Kevin T. Henry, Planning Technician' DATE: November 17, 2005 RE: Discussion: 2006-2007 Capitai Improvements Plan (CIP) On November 14, 2005, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) met with county department and agency representatives to discuss new project requests and project modification requests associated with the 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The role of the CPPS in the CIP process is to ensure that the various departmental project requests are in conformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan, rather than to engage in the evaluation and prioritization of departmental projects. Projected expenditures are included in the proposed CIP as these are required by the Code of Virginia. Following discussion, the CPPS agreed that the CIP requests were in -.,cnformance with the Comprehensive Policy Plan and forwarded the draft documerz out of committee for Planning Commission discussion. It is requested that the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors consider the proposed 2006-2007 GIP as a discussion item prior to the document's advertisement for public hearing. Such discussion will provide a valuable opportunity for collective review of proposed capital projects, while also allowing members to detennine if additional information or analysis is needed in advance of final CIP consideration. Please find attached with this agenda item a summary of the proposed 2006-2007 CIP; information pertaining to new or modified departmental project requests; and a draft copy of the proposed 2006-2007 CIP, which includes two maps illustrating the known locations of the CIP requests. The maps, if ultimately adopted by the Board of Supervisors as an element of the Comprehensive Policy Plan, would satisfy the review requirement of Sec. 15.2-22312 of the Code of Virginia, which states that no public 107 North Rent Street, Suite 202 - 'Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Discussion November 17, 2005 Page 2 facility shall be constructed unless said facility is a "feature shown" within a jurisdiction's comprehensive plan. Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this information. KTH/bad Attachment SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED 2006-2007- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS • The proposed CIP consists of 45 capital projects, an increase over the 43 projects included in the previous CIP. • Of the 36 capital projects that were modified from the 2005-2006 CIP, seven of those projects have changed in priority, in particular, five projects from the public schools have changed in priority. • The proposed CIP includes nine (9) new capital projects, which are as follows: • Seven (7) new projects from the County public schools: o New Elementary School #12 has been brought forth to deal with residential growth in this area. o Land acquisition for eleven facilities to deal with continued growth in Frederick County o Renovations to the Robinson Educational Center and NREP due to old age, as well as growth. The school administration building renovation, which had previously been included as a separate project is included with this request. o Frederick County Middle School Renovation includes additional classrooms and upgrades to the heating, electrical, and plumbing systems for more efficient use in years to come. o Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation will help provide additional classrooms, upgrades to mechanical and waste water treatment plant systems, replacement of windows, and repaving asphalt areas. o New Elementary School #13 is needed to provide for the continuous residential growth in Frederick County. o New Elementary School #14 will be used to relieve current over- crowding. Two (2) new projects from County Administration: o Public Works: The Gore Refuse Site Expansion will provide a more cost efficient means of trash storage. o Fire & Rescue: Relocation of the Clearbrook Fire Station to better fill the needs of the community and upgrade equipment to better serve the growth in the area. • All of the capital projects included with the previous CIP are carried over to the proposed 2006-2007 CIP with the exception of, Elementary School #11, the Sherando Park playground, the Greenwood Road Convenience site expansion, the animal shelter, and the CFFW Community Corrections Center. Proposed 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan Comparison of New Project Requests and Modification Requests Frederick County Public Schools Project Type of 2005-2006 2006-2007 Difference Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) New Gainesboro Modification 17,600,000 17,750,000 150,000 Elementary School Transportation Modification 12,500,000 26,600,000 14,100, 000 Facility New Elementary New N/A 20,451,700 School #12 Robert E. Aylor Modification N/A 18,000,000 Middle School Renovation Land Acquisition New N/A 12,600,000 for Eleven Facilities Robinson Ed. New N/A 15,800,000 Center/ NREP Replacement New Fourth High Modification N/A 55,000,000 School James Wood High Modification N/A 18,000,000 School Renovation Frederick County New N/A 18,000,000 Middle School Renovation Apple Pie Modification N/A 5,000,000 Ridge/Bass Hoover Elementary School Renovations Indian Hollow New N/A 3,000,000 Elementary School Renovation New Fifth Middle Modification N/A 26,000,000 School New Elementary New N/A 20,451,700 School #13 New Elementary New N/A 20,451,700 School #14 Total 30,100, 000 277,105,100 247, 005,100 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Project Type Of 2005-2006 2006-2007 Difference Request Local Local 09 Expenditure Expenditure Request (S) Request (S) Indoor Pool Modification 9,000,000 13,500,000 4,500,000 Water Slide/Spray Modification 1,000,000 1,114,560 114,560 Ground Clearbrook and Sherando Park Land in Modification 2,302,737 4,000,000 1,697,263 Eastern Frederick County Park Land in Modification 1,409,549 3,000,000 1,590,451 Western Frederick County Maintenance Modification 205,725 336,960 131,235 Compound- Sherando Park Open Play Areas- Modification 386,591 444,990 58,399 Clearbrook Park Skateboard Park- Modification 490,752 454,594 -36,158 Sherando Park Lake, Trails, and Modification 858,001 1,054,199 196,198 Parking with 2 -MP Fields Softball Complex- Modification 514,922 593,674 78,752 Sherando Park Baseball Complex Modification 1,056,741 1,177,802 121,061 Renovations- Sherando Park Soccer Complex- Modification 1,178,435 1,790,665 612,230 Sherando Park Tennis/Basketball Modification 403,887 449,772 45,885 Complex- Sherando Park Picnic Areas- Modification 649,882 697,280 47,398 Sherando Park Shelter/Stage- Modification 401,254 443,412 42,158 Clearbrook Park Access Road with Modification 829,781 1,075,304 245,515 Parking and Trails- Sherando Park Field House Modification 1 7,040,000 7,840,800 800,800 Total 1 27, 728, 257 37, 974, 012 10,24 739 County Administration Project r Type of 2005-2006 2006-2007 Difference Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) Public Safety Modification 13,000,000 13,000,000 0 Center Fire & Rescue Modification N/A 3,100,000 N/A Station #22 Round Hill Fire Modification N/A N/A 0 Station Relocation Gainesboro Modification 220,000 250,000 30,000 Convenience Site Relocation Modification 7,000 7,000 0 Gore Refuse Site New N/A 200,000 N/A Expansion Modification 210,000 210,000 0 Clearbrook Fire New N/A 1,530,000 N/A Station- Relocation 365,600 355,600 -10,000 Winchester Regional Airport Project Type of 2005-2006 2006-2007 Difference Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request (S) Request ($ Land Acquisition- Modification 17,300 17,300 0 Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Terminal Building Modification 110,000 100,000 -10,000 Renovation Land Acquisition- Modification 17,300 17,300 0 Parcels 47, 47A, & 48 Upgrade Airfield Modification 4,000 4,000 0 Lights Land Acquisition- Modification 7,000 7,000 0 Parcels 50, 51, & 52 Airfield Maintenance Modification 210,000 210,000 0 Buildin Total 365,600 355,600 -10,000 Handley Regional Library Project Type of 2005-2006 Local 2006-2007 Difference Request Expenditure Local ($) Request ($) Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) Bowman Library- Modification 228,468 228,468 0 Parking Lot & Sidewalk Extension 13, 200, 000 N/A Library facility in Modification 1,053,000 1,053,000 0 Northwestern Frederick County Total 1 1 1,281,468 1 1,281,468 1 0 Clarke-Fauquier-Frederick-Winchester Community Corrections Center (CCC) Project Type of 2005-2006 2006-2007 Difference Request Local Local ($) Expenditure Expenditure Request ($) Request ($) Secure Detention Modification N/A 13,200,000 N/A Expansion Total 13, 200, 000 N/A DRAFT FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 2006-2007 Fiscal Year TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................ 1 PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................2 Frederick County Public Schools...................................................2 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department ............................2 County Administration.............................................................. 2 Winchester Regional Airport ....................................................... 3 Handley Regional Library.......................................................... 3 CFFW Regional Jail................................................................. 3 2006-2007 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP .................................................. 4 2006-2007 COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CAPITAL PROJECTS MAP........... 5 2006-2007 PROJECT SUMMARY TABLE..............................................6 CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS............................................................ 7 PROJECTFUNDING........................................................................ 7 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS................................................................ 9 Frederick County Public Schools...................................................9 New Gainesboro Elementary .............................................. 9 Transportation Facility/Central Administration Complex ............. 9 Elementary School#12..................................................... 9 Robert E. Aylor Middle School Renovation .............................10 Land Acquisition for Eleven Facilities ................................... 10 Robinson Ed. Center/NREP Replacement/Renovation................ 10 Fourth High School.........................................................11 James Wood High School Renovation ................................... 11 Frederick County Middle School Renovation ........................... 11 Apple Pie Ridge/Bass Hoover Elementary School Renovations..... 12 Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation ......................... 12 Fifth Middle School.........................................................12 Elementary School#13.....................................................13 Elementary School #14 ..................................................13 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Department ............... . ...... . .....13 Indoor Swimming Pool.....................................................13 Swimming Pool Improvements-Sherando/Clearbrook................. 14 Park Land- Eastern Frederick County .................................... 14 Park Land- Western Frederick County ................................... 14 Maintenance Compound and Office- Sherando Park .................. 15 Open Play Area- Clearbrook .............................................. 15 Skateboard Park- Sherando.......................................... . ......15 Lake, Parking, and Trail Development/Two Multi -Purpose Fields.. 16 Softball Complex- Sherando.............................................. 16 Baseball Complex Renovation- Sherando ............................... 16 Soccer Complex- Sherando.................................................17 Tennis/Basketball Complex- Clearbrook.................................17 Picnic Area- Sherando...................................................... 17 Shelter/Stage Seating- Clearbrook........................................18 Access Road with Parking and Trails- Sherando........................ 18 FieldHouse.................................................................. 18 County Administration.............................................................. 19 Public Safety Center........................................................ 19 Annex Facilities/Fire & Rescue Station #22 ............................ 19 Round Hill Fire and Rescue Station Relocation ........................ 20 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation ............................... 20 Gore Refuse Site Expansion ............................................... 20 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation ....................................... 21 Winchester Regional Airport ....................................................... 21 Land Acquisition- Bufflick Road — Parcels 31, 46, & 53 ..............21 Terminal Building Renovation ............................................ 21 Land Acquisition— Bufflick Road — Parcels 47, 47A, & 48........... 22 Airfield Lighting Upgrade .................................................. 22 Land Acquisition- Bufflick Road — Parcels 50, 51, & 52 ..............22 Airfield Maintenance Building ............................................ 23 Handley Regional Library...........................................................23 Bowman Library Parking Lot and Sidewalk Extension ............... 23 Northern Frederick County Library Branch ............................. 23 CFFWRegional Jail................................................................. 24 Secure Detention Expansion...............................................24 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN FREDERICK COUNTY 2006-2007 INTRODUCTION Section 15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the county for the ensuing five years. The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the county budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the county must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Specifically, the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not from requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the future it is projected. PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS Frederick County Public Schools In an effort to maintain educational facilities that will handle the growing student population, the construction of three new elementary schools is recommended one replacing the current Gainesboro Elementary building. A new high school and a new middle school have been requested to meet the future demand of a growing student population. A number of school renovations are proposed as is a new transportation facility/administration building. Funding is also being requested for the acquisition of eleven land parcels for future school sites (6 elementary, 3 middle, and 2 high schools). It is important to note that the cost of land for the new schools in this years CIP is included as a separate project. Should land be acquired in this manner, land acquisition costs would be subtracted from the individual projects. Parks & Recreation The majority of the recommended projects are planned for the county's two regional parks (Sherando & Clearbrook). Nine projects are planned for Sherando Park: upgrade pool amenities, maintenance compound and office, skateboard park, parking and multi- purpose fields with trail development, a softball complex, renovations to the existing baseball complex, a soccer complex, picnic area with a shelter, and an access road with parking and trails. There are currently four projects planned for the Clearbrook Park which includes, upgrading pool amenities, a new open play area, a tennis/basketball complex, and shelter with an area for stage seating. In addition the swimming pools at both parks will be updated with water slides and a spray ground. Also planned is an indoor pool with an accompanying field house to be completed in the following years. Various options for the development of this project are being explored, including a public-private partnership. The Parks and Recreation Department has proposed to acquire land in both the eastern and western portions of the county for the development of future regional park system. Both land acquisitions call for 150-200 acres of land to accommodate the recreational needs of the growing population. County Administration Modifications to two of the County's convenience sites have been requested. The first request is that the current Gainesboro facility be moved because of health hazards the current site incurs. The other request is for the expanding the Gore Refuse Site to allow 2 for trash compactor, which will reduce operational costs, by compacting trash before it reaches the landfill. County administration has also proposed a new public safety center. This center will allow for quicker response times, because it will no longer have to compete with the heavy traffic associated with the City of Winchester. The relocation of the Clearbrook Fire Station was also requested to allow for safer exiting/entering along Rt. 11. Winchester Regional Airport All of the Airport requests were carried forward from last year. There are three carried over requests to acquire additional parcels along Bufflick Road which are required to meet noise abatement requirements. Also carried over, is the request to construct a new airfield maintenance building, and a request to upgrade the airfield lighting system to enhance safety for aircraft use of the facility. Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and state governments contribute a majority of the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding. Handley Regional Library The Handley Regional Library has recommended two projects. The library's top priority is a parking lot expansion as well as improvements to sidewalk access at the Bowman Library. The parking lot expansion would accommodate 121 more parking than what is currently available. The library wishes to extend the sidewalks to serve residents traveling from the east to Lakeside Drive. CFFW Regional Jail The Clarke-Fauquier-Frederick-Winchester Regional Jail Board proposes to construct and operate, in accordance with the Public -Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act of 2002, a 34,615 square foot, 96 -bed expansion to the adult detention center. It will be nearly identical to the existing design of the units within the detention center, with additional program space used for the entire detention center population. 3 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Specific or Approximate Locations Parks and Recreation 1 Sherand0 Park 2 Clearbrook Park 3 Future Eastern Parkland 4 Future Western Parkland County Administration 4 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation 5 Gore Convenience Site Expansion 6 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation Airport Library 1 Bowman Library - Parking Lot and Sidewalk Addition 2 Northern Frederick County Library Branch Jail System 1 Secure Detention Expansion Parcels Primary Roads \ Secondary Roads 7erciary Roads DRAFT 2006-2007 Frederick County Capital Improvements Plan ��•� �� �•� f��� w .fir f�5 4 w i Fr\ l"1 ..> ;. • � �_ 11 JN S 15 I "thr.•. Note' 0 12,500 25,000 50,000 75,000 Created by Frederick County Department of Feet Planning & Development 02 4 8 November 03, 2005 12 Map represents the Capital Improvment Requests subm Wed by various county departments. DRAFT Mlles � #15 Elem Schcaol (2012) L � y Alternative New School Locations #12 Elem School #5 MiddleSchool DRJFT etem scnoot -, (2011) r, #4 High School Frhrnr Cr New School Location Alternatives } �M1 Existing Elementary Schools f �f Existing Middle Schools +� School Locations Existing High Schools Are Most Streets Primary Roads Appropriate Secondary Roads Within the UDA TerciaryRoads Winchester City Roads Rt 37 Bypass A. } •� ''b Urban Development Area tSWSA *1E (�D City / Town Bounday Locations suggested by S Frederick County Dept of Planning & Development 0 1 2 4 Miles Map Created by Frederick County Dept of Planning & Development 1 1121 /05 Department Priority COUNTY CONTRIBUTION PER FISCAL YEAR County Contributions Notes Interest From Any Debt Service TOTAL COUNTY COSTS Total Project Costs Protects 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 1 2010-2011 1(PS) Replacement Gainesboro Elem. School 13,775,000 2,190,000 17,750,000 N/A 17,750,000 $17,750,000 2(PS) Transportation Facility/Central Admin. 12,000,000 11,575,000 26,600,000 N/A* 26,600,000 $26,600,000 3(PS) Elementary School #12 1,675,000 13,901,700 4,875,000 20,451,700 N/A* 20,451,700 $20,451,700 4(PS) R.E. Aylor Middle School Renovations 2,500,000 13,275,000 2,225,000 18,000,000 N/A* 18,000,000 $18,000,000 5(PS) Land Acquistion for Eleven Facilities 1,350,000 3,600,000 675,000 1,350,000 5,625,000 12,600,000 N/A* 12,600,000 $12,600,000 6(PS) Robinson Ed. Center/NREP Renovation 500,000 8,300,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 15,800,000 NIA* 15,800,000 $15,800,000 7(PS) 8(PS) Fourth High School James Wood High School Renovation 3,750,000 5,000,000 15,000,000 20,000,000 55,000,000 G N/A* 55,000,000 $55,000,000 9(PS) Frederick Middle School Renovation 1,000,000 500,000 1,000,000 6,000,000 13,500,000 9,500,000 18,000,000 18,000,000 G G N/A* N/A* 18,000,000 $18,000,000 10(PS) Apple Pie Ridge/Bass Hoover Renovation 500,000 3,500,000 1,000,000 5,000,000 N/A* 18,000,000 5,000,000 $18,000,000 $5,000,000 11 (PS) Indian Hollow Elementary Renovation 230,000 1,500,000 3,000,000 G N/A* 3,000,000 $3,000,000 12(PS) 13(PS) Fifth Middle School Elementary School #13 2,350,000 3,150,000 17,500,000 3,000,000 26,000,000 N/A* 26,000,000 $26,000,000 14 PS Elementary School #14 1,575,000 100,000 13,901,700 4,875,000 20,451,700 N/A* 20,451,700 $20,451,700 1,575,000 100,000 13,901,700 20,451,700 G N/A* 20,451,700 $20,451,700 1(PR) Indoor Swimming Pool 13,500,000 13,500,000 0 13,500,000 $13,500,000 2 (PR) Water Slide/Spray Ground (CB, SP) 1,114,560 1,114,560 0 1,114,560 $1,114,560 3 (PR) Park Land Eastern County 4,000,000 4,000,000 0 4,000,000 $4,000,000 4 (PR) Park Land Western County 3,000,000 3,000,000 0 3,000,000 $3,000,000 5 (PR) Maintenance Compound - SP 336,960 336,960 0 336,960 $336,960 6 (PR) Open Play Areas - CB 444,990 444,990 0 444,990 $444,990 7 (PR) Skateboard Park - SP 454,594 454,594 0 454,594 $454,594 8(PR) Lake/Trails/Parking/MPFields -SP 1,054,199 1,054,199 0 1,054,199 $1,054,199 9 (PR) Softball Complex - SP 593,674 593,674 0 593,674 $593,674 10 (PR) Baseball Complex Renovation -SP 1,177,802 1,177,802 0 1,177,802 $1,177,802 11 (PR) 12 (PR) Soccer Complex - SP Tennis/Basketball Complex - CP 1,790,665 1,790,665 0 1,790,665 $1,790,665 13 (PR) Picnic Areas - SP 449,772 449,772 0 449,772 $449,772 14 (PR) Shelter/Stage - CB 697,280 697,280 0 697,280 $697,280 15 (PR) Access Road with Parking & Trails - SP 443,412 1,075,304 443,412 1,075,304 0 0 443,412 $443,412 16 PR Field House 1,075,304 $1,075,304 7,840,8001 7,840,800 0 7,840,800 $7,840,800 1 (CA) 2 (CA) Public Safety Center Annex/Fire & Rescue Station 922 400,000 1,100,000 N/A - PPEA 1,600,000 N/A - PPEA N/A - PPEA 13,000,000 N/A - PPEA 13,000,000 $13,000,000 3 (CA) Relocation of Roundhill Fire & Rescue 3,100,000 C 0 3,100,000 $3,100,000 4(CA) Gainesboro Citizens Convenience Site 20,000 230,000 N/A* 250,000 D N/A * 0 N/A* N/A* 5(CA) Gore Citizens Convenience Site 20,000 180,000 200,000 0 250,000 $250,000 6 CA Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation 1,530,000 1,530,000 0 200,000 $200,000 1(RA) Land Acquistion - Parcels 31, 46, 53 14,000 3,300 1,530,000 $1,530,000 2 (RA) Terminal Building Renovation 100,000 17,300 A,B 0 17,300 $865,000 3 (RA) Land Acquisition - Parcels 47, 47A, 48 13,000 4,300 100,000 A 0 100,000 $500,000 4 (RA) Upgrade Airfield Lights 1,000 3,000 17,300 4,000 A A, B 0 0 17,300 $865,000 5 (RA) Land Acquisition - Parcels 50, 51, 52 7,000 7,000 A 0 4,000 $200,000 6 RA Airfield Maintenance Building 210,000 210,000 A 0 7,000 $350,000 I (HL) Bowman- Parking Lot/Sidewalk Extention 228,468 228,468 0 210,000 $300,000 2 HL New Library 48,000 1,005,000 1,053,000 E 0 228,468 1,053,000 $228,468 $1,053,000 I RJ Secure Detention Expansion N/A** NIA** N/A** N/A** N/A** NIA** F N/A ** N/A ** $13,200,000 TOTALS $49,796,028 $61,843,043 $47,808,613 $56,775,996 1 $78,867,500 $334,796,180 $0 $334,796,180 7350,720,580 A = Partial funding from Vircinia Department of Aviation rvnnAi n-le .- _ __..-__ . _ _. _. ___. _ .. B = Partial funding from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants C = Partial funding from Virginia Department of Aviation (VDOA) grants D = Project costs not identified at time of printing E = Partial funding from private donations. •.•...••....,a u.c �w.c �rcii�uae uv-,. - "itl wi lbtfucnon cosis. G = Funding goes beyond displayed five (5) years N/A = Not available N/A` = Project scope not determined N/A"' = Funding source not determined; debt service uncertain uepartment Priority Abbreviations: PS = Public Schools PR = Parks and Recreation CB = Clearbrook Park SP = Sherando Park CA = County Administratio RA = Regional Airport HL = Handley Library RJ = Regional Jail THE CIP TABLE COi�TENT DEQI-PiPTIONS The Capital Improvements Plan table, on the previous page, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below. Department Priority- The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects. Project Description- The name of the capital improvement projects. County Contribution- The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year columns, does not include debt service projections. Notes- Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects. Interest From Any Debt Service- The projected interest that will be incurred for a particular project. Debt service projections are provided by individual departments and are based on the most accurate interest rate information available at the time the CIP is assembled. Total County Costs- The total estimated expenditures that the county will incur for a particular project. This column includes both fiscal year allocation and debt service expenses associated with each project. Essentially, this column represents the total county contributions for each particular project. Total Project Costs- The cost for each project, including county allocations and other funding sources. PROJECT FUNDING The projects included in the 2006-2007 Capital Improvements Plan have a total project cost to the county of $334,796,180 over the next five years, excluding the interest from any debt service. • School project are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia Literary Fund. • Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the county. The Parks and Recreation 7 Commission will actively seek grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the county. Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester. • The regional jail project will be requesting a 50% reimbursement by the Commonwealth of Virginia. Reimbursement may be "lump sum" or over a period of time specified by contract. The local share is based on the percentage of jurisdictional use averaged for the most recent 3 years for Frederick County. Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List PRIORITY I New Gainesboro Elementary School Description: This project involves the construction of an elementary school (grades K- 5) of approximately 96,300 square feet to serve 750 students. Capital Cost: $17,750,000 Justification: The current site is too limited to justify renovating. The building lacks many facilities and there are health and safety concerns. Construction Schedule: The project is estimated to take one year to complete and scheduling is yet to be determined. PRIORITY 2 Transportation Facility/Central Administration Complex Description: This project involves the site acquisition and development of a new transportation facility for the public school system. This project will also accommodate central administrative offices. Capital Cost: $26,600,000 Justification: The land will be used for the construction of a facility that will accommodate administrative offices, support staff offices, driver training areas, driver and staff meeting area, and will be utilized for the repair, inspection, and service of schools buses, cars, and trucks within the public school system. Construction Schedule: The project is estimated to take one year to complete and scheduling is yet to be determined. PRIORITY 3 Elementary School #12 Description: This project involves the construction of a 96,300-106,000 square foot school on a 15 acre lot. The facility will be designed to accommodate 750-850 students. Capital Cost: $20,451,700 Justification: This school will be located in an area to relieve current overcrowding and to accommodate the projected new housing developments. Construction Schedule: The project is estimated to take one year to complete and scheduling is yet to be determined. 0 PRIORITY 4 Robert E. Aylor Middle School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations of the current facility. Major areas to be included in the project are additional classroom space; a complete replacement of fire alarm and communication systems; upgrade of electrical and plumbing; and complete replacement of mechanical systems. Capital Cost: $18,000,000 Justification: Robert E. Aylor Middle School is soon to be 37 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of different areas to insure economic and efficient operation of the school for years to come. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 5 Land Acquisition for Eleven Facilities Description: This project will include the acquisition of land for six elementary schools (numbers 12-17), two middle schools (numbers 5 and 6), and two high schools (numbers 4 and 5). Capital Cost: $12,600,000 Justification: This project will help alleviate overcrowding in the growing areas of Frederick County. The elementary school facilities will serve up to 850 students, middle school facilities will serve 850 students and high school facilities will serve 1,250 students. Construction Schedule: N/A *Note: Should site acquisition be funded through this project, site acquisition costs will be subtracted from each individual school project costs. PRIORITY 6 Robinson Ed. Center/NREP Replacement/Renovation Description: This project involves the renovation and upgrade of two buildings along Smithfield Ave. and Roosevelt Blvd. and the renovation of the administration building located on Amherst St. Areas such as roof replacement; HVAC, electrical, plumbing systems, and specifically a total window replacement at the Smithfield Ave. building are needed. Capital Cost: $15,800,000 Justification: The facility that houses the ED and Long Term Suspension programs will serve from 70-80 students. The facility that houses the pre-school special education program will serve 120-180 students. Construction Completion: To be determined 10 PRIORITY 7 Fourth High School Description: This project consists of the development of a fourth high school serving grades 9-12 with a program capacity of 1,250 students. The project location has yet to be determined, but will have a floor area of approximately 242,000 square feet and is to be located on approximately 50 acres of land. Capital Cost: $55,000,000 Justification: This project will address continued growth in student enrollment in the school division over the next five years. It is anticipated that student enrollment will increase at all levels. Student enrollment in the high schools by the fall of 2010 is projected to be 4,120. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 8 James Wood High School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations of the existing facility. Major areas to be included in the project include increased electrical service and distribution to support technology; technology cabling, hardware, and its installation; upgrade of plumbing and mechanical systems; and modification of instructional areas to support instructional delivery. Capital Cost: $18,000,000 Justification: Updating the facility will assist the school division in meeting the community needs for the citizens and high school student in the James Wood High School attendance zone. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10-11 PRIORITY 9 Frederick County Middle School Renovation Description: This project involves renovations to security; replacement of the fire alarm system, and roof, upgrades to the heating, electrical, and plumbing systems. Also within the renovation, additional classroom space is needed. Capital Cost: $18,000,000 Justification: Renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure economic and efficient operation of the school. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10-11 11 PRIORITY 10 Apple Pie Ridge/Bass Hoover Elementary School Renovations Description: This project includes renovations to both schools, which consists of additional classroom space; roof replacement at Apple Pie Ridge; and upgrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. Capital Cost: $5,000,000 Justification: These renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure economic and efficient operation of the schools for years to come. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10-11 PRIORITY 11 Indian Hollow Elementary School Renovation Description: This project includes renovations that involve additional classroom space; security; and upgrades to mechanical and waste water treatment plant systems, replacement of windows and repaving of asphalted areas. Capital Cost: $3,000,000 Justification: The school is 18 years of age and renovations are needed to a number of areas to insure the economical and efficient operation of the school for years to come. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 11-12 PRIORITY 12 Fifth Middle School Description: This project consists of the development of a new middle school serving grades 6-8 with a capacity of 850 students. The project location has yet to be determined but will have a floor area of approximately 166,000 square feet and will be located on approximately 30 acres of land. Capital Cost: $26,000,000 Justification: This project will address continued growth in student enrollment over the next five years. Middle school enrollment in 2010 is projected to be 3,387. Construction Schedule: To be determined 12 PRIORITY 13 Elementary School #13 Description: This project consists of the development of a new elementary school serving 750-850 students. The elementary school would be located upon 15 acres with a floor space of 96,000- 106,000 square feet. Capital Cost: $20,451,700 Justification: This project will be in a location that will relieve current overcrowding and accommodate projected housing developments. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 14 Elementary School #14 Description: This project consists of the development of a new elementary school serving 750-850 students. The elementary school would be located upon 15 acres with a floor space of 96,300-106,000 square feet. Capital Cost: $20,451,700 Justification: This school will be located an area to relieve overcrowding and accommodate projected new housing developments. Construction Schedule: To be determined Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Indoor Swimming Pool Description: This facility would house a leisure and competitive lap swimming pool with an office, storage and locker rooms. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the county and would utilize approximately 10-12 acres with parking. The facility will be designed to accommodate the addition of Field House amenities (priority 16). Capital Cost: $13,500,000 Justification: Parks and Recreation has relied heavily in the past on the public schools to house Parks and Recreation programs. This project would permit the Parks and Recreation department to meet citizen programming demands, provide an instructional facility, as well as provide the area with a facility that would attract new businesses to the community. This facility would be available to all area residents. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. 13 PRIORITY 2 Swimming Pool Improvements — Sherando/Clearbrook Description: This project consists of removing the diving boards and installing two water slides at both Sherando and Clearbrook Park. The upgrade would also include the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool. Capital Cost: $1,114,560 Justification: This project is expected to increase pool attendance by 30 percent while providing recreational opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service areas. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07. PRIORITY 3 Park Land - Eastern Frederick County Description: Parkland acquisition in the eastern portion of the county. Capital Cost: $4,000,000 Justification: A new 150-200 acre regional park would be utilized by the entire county population. The park would be located in the primary growth center of Frederick County. This project would reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for the Frederick County service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. Construction Schedule: Acquisition in FY 07-08. PRIORITY 4 Park Land — Western Frederick County Description: Parkland acquisition in the western portion of the county. Capital Cost: $3,000,000 Justification: A new 150-200 acre regional park would be utilized by the entire county population. This project would reduce the gap between the amount of existing parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for the Frederick County service area, as recommended by the Virginia Outdoors Plan. The location of this project would provide parkland to create more accessible recreational facilities to residents in western Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Acquisition in FY 07-08. 14 PRIORITY 5 Maintenance Compound and Office — Sherando Park Description: This project involves the construction of a 1,200 square -foot office and a 4,000 square -foot storage shed for operation at Sherando Park. Capital Cost: $336,960 Justification: This facility will enable the county to maintain equipment and facilities in a more responsible and effective manner. The additional responsibility to maintain the outdoor facilities at Sherando High School increases the need for more storage, maintenance, and office space. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 PRIORITY 6 Open Play Area — Clearbrook Description: This project includes development of a picnic shelter; six horseshoe pits; a volleyball court; croquet turf, shuffleboard; parking; refurbishing the existing concession stand; and renovations to existing shelters, access paths, and parking areas on the south side of the lake. Capital Cost: $444,990 Justification: These facilities will provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park Service Area which will lessen the disparity between the number of passive recreational areas needed to meet the minimum standards for this service area. Clearbrook Park offers the best location for this development. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. PRIORITY 7 Skateboard Park - Sherando Park Description: This project recommends the development of a skateboard bowl; a half pipe; an open skate area; vehicle parking; an access road; fencing; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $454,594 Justification: This facility will enable the county to provide a recreational facility that has been requested for the community's youth. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08. 15 PRIORITY 8 Lake, Parking, and Trail Development with two Multi-purpose Fields Description: This project involves the development of a 12 acre lake; 1.5 mile trail system around the lake; 800 linear feet of access roadway; lighted parking lot with 125 spaces; and development of two irrigated 70x120 yard multi-purpose fields. Capital Cost: $1,054,199 Justification: This facility will provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. The development of this facility will reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number required to meet the minimum standards established for the service area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 PRIORITY 9 Softball Complex- Sherando Park Description: This project includes two softball fields; an access road; parking spaces; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $593,674 Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire county population, as well as the Frederick County School System. Presently, there are ten softball and baseball fields within the county's regional park system. Eight of the existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball, as well as adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become increasingly difficult to facilitate these programs. This project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate the existing demand for youth baseball and adult softball programs. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 PRIORITY 10 Baseball Complex Renovation- Sherando Park Description: This project includes an upgrade to the lighting system; renovation of four existing baseball fields; and renovations of existing restrooms, access roads, and walkways. Capital Cost: $1,177,802 Justification: This facility, presently serving as both youth baseball and adult softball fields, would be used by the Little League Programs within the Sherando Park service area. In addition to its use as a recreational facility, the athletic complex will also be used 16 by the Frederick County School System. This project cannot be completed until the Sherando Softball Complex is completed. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 PRIORITY 11 Soccer Complex- Sherando Park Description: This project includes the development of two soccer fields; access paths; restrooms; concession; one picnic shelter; a plaza; landscaping; and lighting. Capital Cost: $1,790,665 Justification: This facility will serve the entire county population and will be utilized by the Frederick County School System. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 PRIORITY 12 Tennis/Basketball Complex- Clearbrook Park Description: This project includes the development of four tennis courts; two basketball courts; a shelter; access paths; parking; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $449,772 Justification: These facilities will be available to all county residents. Currently, there are no tennis courts or basketball courts in the Clearbrook Park Service Area. Clearbrook Park is utilized by over 180,000 visitors annually; therefore, these facilities are needed. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 PRIORITY 13 Picnic Area- Sherando Park Description: This project includes a restroom/concession area; four picnic shelters; playground area; access paths; parking; and landscaping. Capital Cost: $697,280 Justification: These facilities would be used by the residents of southern Frederick County. This area of the county is growing and is deficient in passive recreational opportunities. This project is to be included for Sherando Park. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 09-10 17 PRIORITY 14 Shelter/Stage Seating- Clearbrook Park Description: This project includes the development of a shelter with a performance stage; refurbishing existing restrooms and access paths; and renovations to the lake. Capital Cost: $443,412 Justification: This facility would be used by the entire county population. Presently, there are no facilities to accommodate cultural programs within the county's park system. This project is needed to provide a facility for cultural activities. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 09-10 PRIORITY 15 Access Road with Parking and Trails- Sherando Park Description: This project involves the development of an entrance and 1,800 linear feet of access roadway from Warrior Drive; a 100 space parking area; and 2.8 miles of trails. Capital Cost: $1,075,304 Justification: This facility will provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick County community. The development of this facility will reduce the needs gap between the number of existing passive recreational areas and the number required to meet the minimum standards established for the service area. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 09-10 PRIORITY 16 Field House Description: This facility would be attached to the Indoor Swimming Pool (Priority 1). The project involves building a 44,000 square foot facility that would contain an indoor track and at least two basketball courts. The court area would be designed to be used by indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton. The area could also be used for special events. Additionally, the project would house a fitness center, multi-purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms. Capital Costs: $7,840,800 Justification: This facility would give the Parks and Recreation Department the ability to offer year round recreational programming to the residents of Frederick County. It would also allow the Parks and Recreation Department to meet the increasing demand for recreational programming in Frederick County. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 10-11 18 County Administration Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Public Safety Center Description: This project recommends the development of a 60,000 square foot facility for the Frederick County Sheriff's Office and Fire and Rescue Services. This will allow the Frederick County Sheriff s Office to vacate the Winchester -Frederick County Joint Judicial Center. Capital Cost: $13,000,000 Justification: The Frederick County Sheriff's Office currently has 80 employees that occupy the space in the Winchester -Frederick County Joint Judicial Center (JJC). When this space was first occupied, there were 36 employees in the office. Representatives of the JJC have indicated that additional space is required for court offices and other arms of the judicial branch. Development of a new facility in the county will enhance the response time for emergency service in the safest possible manner. The current location of the Sheriff's Office in the JJC increases emergency response time due to congested streets and heavily populated areas, thus compromising safety to persons and property. Construction Schedule: Construction to begin FY 06-07 PRIORITY 2 Annex Facilities/Fire & Rescue Station 922 Description: This project will consist of several facilities located at strategic location throughout the county to house employees of the Sheriff's Office, the Treasurer's Office, and the Commissioner of Revenue's Office. A 10,000 square foot fire station would be included with the offices located in the Fairfax Pike area. Capital Cost: $3,100,000 Justification: The development of satellite along major transportation networks and in areas of dense population will provide ease of access for citizens and will improve services to the county. The county continues to experience a significant rate of growth; therefore, it is important to provide services within these areas instead of requiring citizens to confront congestion, limited parking, and accessibility in the City of Winchester. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 19 PRIORITY 3 Round Hill Fire and Rescue Station Relocation Description: This project includes the relocation and building of a 22,000 square foot facility to accommodate ten or more pieces of emergency equipment and to house living and sleeping areas for staff. A community center of approximately 10,000 square feet, with a capacity of 400 people, is also planned; it would be used for fundraising events and other activities. The project would need a parcel of three to five acres. Capital Cost: N/A Justification: The existing facility serving the Round Hill area is 50+ years old and not large enough to accommodate the equipment needed to serve the Round Hill community. This community includes approximately 9,000 households, three schools, and the Winchester Medical Center. Construction Schedule: To be determined PRIORITY 4 Gainesboro Convenience Site Relocation Description: This project involves the relocation and expansion of the Gainesboro convenience site. The project would include fencing; earthwork; retaining walls; electric; and paving. Capital Cost: $250,000 Justification: The project is necessary to provide adequate trash disposal service for citizens living in the Gainesboro area of Frederick County. The existing site is inadequate and cannot be expanded to provide for safe ingress/egress or fencing to prevent illegal dumping. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 PRIORITY 5 Gore Refuse Site Expansion Description: This project involves the expansion of the site by approximately one acre to install a trash compactor. With the relocation of the landfill site and purchase of new equipment, the present compactor will be surplus. Capital Cost: $200,000 Justification: Installation of this compactor at Gore will drive down collection costs at the site where trash is now collected in 8 -yard boxes. This expansion will provide needed capacity for heavy flow times. Ultimately the intent of the site is to make best use of existing equipment while lowering operational costs in the Gore service area. Construction Schedule: Start in FY 08-09 20 PRIORITY 6 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation Description: The new facility is to be located either North or South of Brucetown Rd. The building is to be six (6) drive through bays, administration, eating, and sleeping facilities along with a dining hall. The structure is to be approximately 28,000 square feet. Capital Cost: $1,530,000 Justification: This project calls for Fire Station 413 to be relocated to an area that has a much safer exit/entrance way. This project will also accommodate the growth in Northeastern Frederick County. Construction Schedule: To be determined Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 31, 46, & 53 Description: Acquisition of three parcels along Bufflick Road. Capital Cost: $865,000 Local Cost: $17,300 Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within both the Airport's FAR Part 77 Primary Surface and/or approach surface and the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential land use within the noise contour to be incompatible with airport operations and encourages airports to resolve such incompatibility through land acquisition. Moreover, under the FAA's Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia, the Airport is required to assume fee simple ownership of property located within the Primary Surface. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07 PRIORITY 2 Terminal Building Renovation, Phase II Description: This project involves repairs and upgrades to the existing terminal building including fixing the exterior surface; stopping leaks in the roof; and replacing the HVAC system. Capital Cost: $500,000 Local Cost: $100,000 Justification: The building was constructed in 1992 and is beginning to show several areas of wear including delaminating of the exterior surface and a leaking roof. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 21 PRIORITY 3 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 47, 47A, &.48 Description: Acquisition of three parcels located along Bufflick Road. Property is included in the 20 year Master Plan. Capital Cost: $865,000 Local Cost: $17,300 Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located inside the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 PRIORITY 4 Airfield Lighting Upgrade Description: This project involves the upgrade of the existing medium intensity runway lighting to high intensity runway lighting and the upgrade of the two -box precision approach path indicator (PAPI) to a four -box PAPI. Capital Cost: $200,000 Local Cost: $4,000 Justification: This project is necessary to accommodate the increase in aircraft that utilize the Winchester Regional Airport. Construction Schedule: Design in FY 07-08 with construction in FY 08-09 PRIORITY 5 Land Acquisition — Bufflick Road — Parcels 50, 51, & 52 Description: Acquisition of three parcels located along Bufflick Road. Property is included in the 20 Year Master Plan. Capital Cost: $350,000 Local Cost: $7,000 Justification: This project is necessary as the identified parcels are located within the Airport's FAR Part 77 primary surface and/or approach surface. In addition, several of the residential parcels are located inside the FAA's projected DNL 65 noise contour. The FAA considers residential use within the noise contour non -compatible with airport operations. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 09-10 22 PRIORITY 6 Airfield Maintenance Building Description: Demolition of undersized wooden structure and construction of a new facility to accommodate the airport's maintenance equipment and maintenance work activities. Capital Cost: $300,000 Local Cost: $210,000 Justification: This project is necessary to accommodate maintenance activities at the airport. Construction Schedule: To be determined Handley Regional Library Project Priority List PRIORITY 1 Bowman Library Parking Lot and Sidewalk Extension Description: This proposal is to expand the parking lot on the Lakeside Drive side of the library from 101 to 221 parking spaces, and to provide a sidewalk that will extend approximately 400 to 500 feet beyond the sidewalk that now borders the parking lot to connect to the sidewalk on Lakeside Drive. Capital Cost: $228,468 Justification: The parking lot expansion is needed to relieve overcrowding and to accommodate library patrons. The sidewalk is necessary to provide safe access for pedestrians to the library. Planning consideration for alternative modes of transportation such as bicycle connectivity should also be considered. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 06-07 PRIORITY 2 Northern Frederick County Library Branch Description: This project entails the acquisition of 3 to 4 acres and the construction of a 7,000 square foot library branch with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet along Route 522 N near Cross Junction. Initial parking would accommodate 35 vehicles. Capital Cost: $1,053,000 Justification: There is no library in this area of the county to serve residents. The residents of the Gainesboro District comprise the largest population group the greatest distance away from a library. The library would serve members of the population from toddlers to senior citizens. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 08-09 CFFW Regional Jail Project Priority List 23 PRIORITY 1 Secure Detention Expansion Description: A 34,615 square foot 96 bed facility that will be connected to the existing secure detention center to accommodate growth in inmate population. The expansion will be partially designed for direct supervision housing. It will also include a segregation unit, classification, and negative air flow facilities. Capital Cost: $13,200,000 Justification: The core facilities were designed to support the expansion and land was acquired during the initial construction. Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 07-08 24 COUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development P✓iEMORANDiJiW TO: Frederick County Planning Commission FROM: Bernard S. Suchicital, Planner I RE: Discussion Item — Revisions to the Eastern head Plan DATE: November 16, 2005 540/ 665-5,51 FAX: 540/665-6395 Introduction The Frederick County Eastern Road Plan is an element of the Comprehensive Policy Plan. Any revisions to the Eastern Road Plan require a recommendation from the Planning Commission and adoption by the Board of Supervisors. The Eastern Road Plan covers the eastern portion of the County and describes existing and proposed roads according to their functional classification. The Comprehensive Policy Plan states that new roads shown on the road plan should be constructed by the developer when warranted by the scale, intensity or impacts of the development. Existing roads should also be improved as necessary by adjacent development to implement the intentions of the plan. The first map (attached) shows the existing Eastern Road. The second map shows the existing Metropolitan Planning Organization 2030 Transportation Plan (MPO) for new and improved transportation corridors in Winchester and the urban portion of Frederick County. The third map is a composite of the two previously mentioned maps, the Winchester Area Transportation Study (WATS), land use plans, approved rezonings and master development plans (MDP). Proposed Revisions Northeast Land Use Plan Addition of the Carroll Industrial Park "Loop Road." This new major collector road will begin at US Route 11, north of Exit 317, and then terminate at Ebert Road, which will be designated as an improved major collector road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan and the Carroll Industrial Park Master Development Plan (MDP). 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 - Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Discussion Item — Revisions to the Eastern Road Plan November 16, 2005 Page 2 • Addition of Cross Cannon Blvd., from Stephenson Road south to US Route 11. This has been identified in the Win -Fred MPO 2030 Transportation Plan (MPO) and the Stephenson Village MDP. • Addition of a new major collector road, extending east from Rest Church Road and US Route 11, then south to Woodbine Road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan and the Semples Rezoning. • Reconfiguring Woodbine Road as a new maj or collector road. This has been identified in the Semples Rezoning • Removing the "kinks" out of the northeast segment of State Route 37. The MPO has classified this segment as a "managed access" highway, therefore creating flexibility for possible additional access points along Route 37, between Interstate 81 and Route 7. • Addition of the Brooke Road extension from US Route 11 to US Route 522. This has been identified in the Winchester Area Transportation Study (WATS) and by the MPO. • Addition of a southbound on-ramp from Lenoir Drive to Route 37. This has been identified in the MPO plan. • Reclassify US Route 11 between the West Virginia state line and Exit 317 as an improved major collector. This is identified in the MPO plan. 37 West Land Use Plan • Addition of the Long Green Lane extension from US Route 522 south to US Route 50. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan. • Addition of the Apple Pie Ridge extension from US Route 522 to Long Green Lane. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan. • Addition of the Campus Blvd. extension across Route 37 from the Winchester Medical campus to Long Green Lane. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, and the Winchester Medical Center MDP. Round Hill Land Use Plan • Addition of the WWW MDP and Winchester Medical Center MDP major and minor collector road networks. These have been identified in the Land Use Plan and both the WWW and Winchester Medical Center MDPs. Discussion Item — Revisions to the Eastern Road Plan November 16, 2005 Page 3 Addition of a flyover of Medical Center Drive, from Hospital Drive across Route 37, to Perennial Drive. This has been identified in the Winchester Medical Center MDP. • Realignment of the Round Hill Road and US Route 50 intersection. This has been identified in the WWW MDP. Western Jubal Early Land Use Plan Addition of the Jubal Early Drive extension from the Winchester city limit to Route 37 with a new interchange at the Merrimans Lane flyover. This has been identified in both the Land Use Plan and the MPO plan. Addition of a new major collector road running from the future Jubal Early Drive extension south to Cedar Creek Grade. This has been identified in both the Land Use Plan and the MPO. Route 11 South Corridor Land Use Plan • Addition of the Stephens City by-pass major collector road from the relocated I-81 exit 307 to the Springdale/Shady Elm intersection. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, WATS, and the MPO. • Addition of Shady Elm Road as an improved major collector from Apple Valley Road to the future intersection of the Stephens City by-pass and Springdale Road, with a new interchange at Route 37. This has been identified in WATS and the MPO. • Addition of Prosperity Road extending to Soldiers Rest Lane and Shady Elm Road as a new major collector road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, WATS, and the MPO. ® Addition of the Tasker Road extension from Lakeside Drive, across I-81, to the future Stephens City by-pass as a new major collector road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, WATS, and the MPO. • Addition of the Squirrel Lane extension from Marlboro Road / Fairfax Street to the future Tasker Road extension as a new minor collector road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, WATS, and the MPO. • Addition of anew minor collector road from US Route 11, roughly across from Shenandoah Valley Baptist Church & Academy, east to the future Squirrel Lane extension. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan and the MPO. Discussion Item — Revisions to the Eastern Road Plan November 16, 2005 Page 4 • Addition of US Route 11 as an improved major collector running from Shawnee Drive to just north of the Bartonsville Historic District. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan. • Addition of a new minor collector road running from Stickley Drive and connecting it to Aylor Road. This has been identified by WATS and the MPO. • Addition of the Warrior Drive extension as anew major collector road, running south from Fairfax Pike to Double Church Road, then west to Town Run Lane, connecting with the future Stephens City by-pass and yet -to -be relocated Exit 307. This has been identified in the MPO plan. Southern Frederick Land Use Plan ® Realignment of Papermill Road at its intersection with US Route 522 south to Justes Drive. Also, Papermill's crossing of 1-81 will be realigned with Battaile Drive with a new interchange with I-81. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan and the MPO plan. • Addition of anew major collector road, extending from Tasker Road and Route 37 north to Evendale Lane, and continuing to Papermill Road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, the Crosspointe Rezoning, and the MPO plan. a Addition of a new minor collector road extending from Caldwell Lane to the future northern extension Tasker Road. This has been identified in the Crosspointe Rezoning. • Continuation of Justes Drive as a major collector road extending to Victory Road and Airport Road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan and the MPO. • Addition of anew major collector road extending from Longcroft Road and US Route 522 west to future Warrior Drive. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan. • Reclassify a new major collector road running east to west through the Crosspointe project as a new minor collector road. This has been identified in the Crosspointe Rezoning. o Addition of a new minor collector road extending south from Chinkapin Drive to future Tasker Road. This has been identified in the WATS plan. o Addition of anew minor collector road extending north from Chinkapin Drive to a proposed minor collector road in the Crosspointe project. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan. • Reclassify current Chinkapin Drive to an improved minor collector road. Discussion Item — Revisions to the Eastern Road Plan November 16, 2005 Page 5 • Realigning future East and West Parkins Mill Road to cross US Route 522 north of its current intersection. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan. Addition of a new minor collector road connecting US Route 522, through Canter Estates, Phase 5, to future West Parkins Mill. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, and the Canter Estates V MDP. • Addition of anew minor collector road connecting Macedonia Church Road to Marcel Drive. This has been identified in the Tasker -Woods Land Use Plan. Route 50 East Corridor Land Use Plan • Addition of anew major collector road extending west from Airport Road and US Route 522 to future Warrior Drive. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, WATS, and the MPO. • Addition of a new major collector road extending south from US Route 17/50 and Prince Frederick Drive to US Route 522, and then across I-81 to the Tevis Street alignment in the City of Winchester. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, WATS, and the MPO. • Addition of a new major collector road extending east from future US Route 522 to the intersection of US Route 17/50 and Sulphur Spring Road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, and the Carpers Valley Rezoning. • Addition of anew major collector road extending south from Inverlee Way to the proposed Carpers Valley collector road. This has been identified in the Land Use Plan, and the Carpers Valley Rezoning. • Extending a major collector road from Channing Drive and Sulphur Spring Road to the Independence Dr / US Route 17/50 intersection. This is not on any of the current plans, but was identified by the CPPS as an important link. • Addition of a new minor collector road extending east from future Inverlee Way to Greenwood Road. This is not on any of the current plans, but was identified by staff as an important link. Route 7 East Corridor Land Use Plan Remove improved minor road status on Valley Mill Road from Brookland Lane to Route 7, and creating a new intersection with Route 7 and the new Winchester Gateway shopping center. Discussion Item — Revisions to the Eastern Road Plan November 16, 2005 Page 6 Other o Future interchanges have been added to the Eastern Road Plan to better coordinate the upcoming growth in Frederick County. Transportation Committee The Transportation Committee considered these proposals at its meeting of November 1, 2005. Committee members expressed concern for the lack of mention of any additional access points along State Route 37, between Interstate 81 and State Route 7. The Transportation Committee recommended the proposed revisions to the Eastern Road Plan. Comprehensive Plan and Programs Subcommittee The Comprehensive Plan and Programs Subcommittee (CPPS) considered these plan revisions at its meeting on November 14, 2005. The Subcommittee members questioned whether an endorsement for the Eastern Road Plan will be an endorsement for Route 37. Staff clarified that the Eastern Road Plan identifies a general path for Route 37, not a specific one. The Comprehensive Plan and Programs Subcommittee recommended the proposed revisions to the Eastern Road Plan. Planning Commission Staff is seeking comments from the Planning Commission regarding these plan revisions that could be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors during their discussion of this item. Attachments BSS/bad lmlJ ' 37 50 Lhuah Ln uan Oi Pl�infyltl S Q M N'' sot J LQMRd �N+alwooa w.... 1* Fp. 1 g�� 1 .\ W+ E S /%/ County Boundary County Roadways , V, Primary Roads /�/ Secondary Roads /'�,.' Terciary Roads /VNew Major Collector V New Minor Collector 1IImproved Major Collector Improved Minor Collector IV New Major Artery May 11, 2005 EASTERN ROAD PLAN Frederick County, Virginia Department of Planning &Development --------------------'---'---------------------'---'---'— ---------------- --�-------------r--------- Win-Fred MPQ 2030 TransUortation Plan Legend West ;Arlo F-,xjnldr; Iry 23 ko 25 ZJ ity 87 33 Vision pLinProjects Figure *1 ~ i N W+ + E S -101-1912005 EASTERN ROAD PLAN Frederick County, Virginia Department of Planning & Development DRAFT Eastern Road Plan '^ N Improved Major Collector id Improved Minor Collector ;,�' Major Artery ;�`t-} /0® Improve Major Arterial r : AV Improve Minor Arterial Major Collector, New 49 Major Collector Minor Collector, New Minor Collector ^i Ramp, New r Proposed Interchanges r`f Last Revision -101-1912005 EASTERN ROAD PLAN Frederick County, Virginia Department of Planning & Development