The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 09-01-10 Meeting AgendaAGENDA FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION The Board Room Frederick County Administration Building Winchester, Virginia September 1, 2010 7:00 P.MMa CALL TO ORDER TAB 1) Adoption of Agenda: Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission should adopt the Agenda for the meeting................................................................ (no tab) 2) July 21, 2010 Minutes...................................................................................................... (A) 3) Committee Reports.................................................................................................. (no tab) 4) Citizen Comments.................................................................................................... (no tab) PUBLIC HEARING 5) Conditional Use Permit 906-10 for Debra Broughear, for a Cottage Occupation — Hair Salon and an Off -Premise Sign. The property is located at 376 Back Mountain Road (Route 614), and is identified with Property Identification Numbers 40-A-11 I and 40-A- 112 in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Mr. Johnston.................................................................................................................... (B) 6) Conditional Use Permit #07-10 for Global Tower Assets LLC, presented by Lynn Koerner, Contractor, for a 250 foot self support Telecommunications Tower. This property is located at the intersection of Brill Road (Route 603) and Highway 55, and is identified with Property Identification Number 69 -A -7F in the Back Creek Magisterial District. Mr. Cheran....................................................................................................................... (C) 7) 2010 North East Land Use Plan (NELUP) Update - An amendment to the 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Chapter 6, Land Use, to update the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan, NELUP. The amendment adjusts the future land use, transportation, and community facility elements of the Plan and, accordingly, updates the text of the land use Plan. In general, the plan continues to promote the economic development opportunities of the study area, recognizes the Developmentally Sensitive Areas, addresses community facility needs, and seeks to implement significant transportation improvements in support of the Plan. No modification of the Urban Development Area or the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) is proposed. The area is generally located north of the City of Winchester to the West Virginia State Line, generally east and west of Interstate 81, and Clarke County to the East. This is mostly within the Stonewall Magisterial District. Mr. Ruddy........................................................................................................................ (D) 8) Other FILE COPY MEETING MINUTES OF THE FFFDE1RjCK COtWT V PLANNING COMMISSION Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in Winchester, Virginia on July 21, 2010. PRESENT: June M. Wilmot, Chairman/Member at Large; Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/ Opequon District; Gary R. Oates, Stonewall District; J. Stanley Crockett, Stonewall District; Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Shawnee District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; George J. Kriz, Gainesboro District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Kevin O. Crosen, Back Creek District; Roderick Williams, County Attorney; and Kevin Talley, Winchester Planning Commission Liaison. ABSENT: Christopher M. Mohn, Red Bud District; Philip E. Lemieux, Red Bud District; and Brian Madagan, Opequon District. STAFF PRESENT: Eric R. Lawrence, Planning Director; Mark R. Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator; and Renee' S. Arlotta, Clerk. CALL TO ORDER & ADOPTION OF AGENDA Chairman Wilmot called the meeting to order a Commissioner Kriz to adopt the July 21, 2010, agenda for this seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously passed. MINUTES t 7:00 p.m. A motion was made by evening's meeting. This motion was Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the May 5, 2010, minutes of the Frederick County Planning Commission were unanimously approved as presented. Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the May 19, 2010, minutes of the Frederick County Planning Commission were unanimously approved as presented. Upon motion made by Commissioner Kriz and seconded by Commissioner Thomas, the June 2, 2010, minutes of the Frederick County Planning Commission were unanimously approved as presented. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2657 Minutes of July 21, 2010 �-2- COM HTTEE REPORTS Comprehensive Plans & Programs Committee — 6/14/10 Mtg. Commissioner Kriz reported the consideration of a Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendment for Tasker Woods with the Board of Supervisors at working meeting. He said the Board did not completely agree with the Planning Commission's recommendation. Commissioner Kriz said there were also committee reports. Transportation Committee — 6/28/10 Mtg. Commissioner Kriz reported on the following items: 1) Initial discussion on the Route 522 South Draft Report by the MPO (Metropolitan Planning Organization); 2) The Comprehensive Policy Plan Update is progressing; meetings with various agencies have been productive; a need was recognized for the nomenclature to be the same as that used by VDOT, wherever possible, so that ordinance changes will not have to be made; the Transportation Section of the Comprehensive Policy Plan was submitted to the chair of the Rewrite Committee on July 6; 3) The state route number for Fox Drive will be changed administratively, at the request of citizens, to Route 766; the disconnect between the Route 739 and Fox Drive, because of the bypass, was causing confusion for out-of-town motorists. Sanitation Authori — 7/20/10 Mtg. Commissioner Unger reported that total customer base for water is 13,301; sewer is 12,835; there was an increase of 235 customers last year. He said rainfall for the month of May was 2.4 inches, which is down a little, but groundwater is still okay. Water production for the Diehl plant is 2 mgd; the Anderson plant is 2.1 mgd; approximately 1 mgd is being purchased from the City; and daily average is about 5.3 mgd. Commissioner Unger said the Diehl quarry is down about ten feet from last month, but this is acceptable. He added that the problem of rags in the sewer lines is on-going and investigation is continuing. Historic Resources Advisory Board (ERAB) — 6/15/10 Mtg. Commissioner Oates reported on two items considered by the HRAB: 1) The AT&T telecommunications tower, which will be considered this evening by the Planning Commission, was reviewed by the HRAB. He said the HRAB's preference was for the tower not to be built, due to the viewscape from the battlefield; however, if it was passed, they would like to see the number of Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2658 Minutes of July 21, 2010 -3 - microwave dishes limited to two and that the tower be a monopole, not lattice, construction. 2) Consideration of a request by Homespun to expand their use to include a photography gallery and a tea room. Commissioner Oates said the HRAB was favorable with the request; however, they preferred the new building for the photography studio be placed to the rear of the property and they directed the staff to work with the applicant. Development Impact Model Oversight Committee (DIMOC) — 6/08/10 Mtg. Commissioner Manuel reported that the DIMOC reviewed the annual updated DIM figures and engaged in discussion regarding the model. Winchester Planning Commission Winchester Planning Commissioner and Liaison, Kevin Talley, reported that the Commission is working on finding better locations for tattoo and body piercing parlors; they are working OD their Comprehensive Policy Plan, currently focusing on the chapter dealing with mobility; and they are working on text amendments, involving child care home services, assisted living, and various types of fencing within the City. Comprehensive Policy Plan Update Chairman Wilmot reported on the progress of the Comprehensive Policy Plan Update. She said the working group is probably one-third the way through and they started on April 1, 2010. She said July 1, 2010, was the deadline date for working groups to submit the chapters they were assigned. Chairman Wilmot said she was delighted to report that all chapters were received. She said the staff is now moving into melding different styles of writing to a common document. CITIZEN COMMENTS Chairman Wilmot called for public comments on any subject not on the Commission's agenda for this evening. No one came forward to speak. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2659 Minutes of July 21, 2010 -4 - PUBLIC HEARING Conditional Use Permit #04-10 for Shenandoah Mobile Company/ Timber Ridge Ministries for a 95 -foot monopole telecommunications tower at 2835 Front Royal Pike. This property, zoned RA (Rural Areas), is located off of Route 522 South (Front Royal Pike) at WTRM Radio Station. The property is further identified with P.I.N. 76-A-54 in the Shawnee Magisterial District. Action — Recommended Approval with Conditions Zoning and Subdivision Administrator, Mark R. Cheran, reported that the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows commercial telecommunication facilities in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved conditional use permit (CUP). Mr. Cheran noted there were no properties of significant historical value or any historical sites adjacent to this proposed use. He said the proposed telecommunications facility will be located on property on the eastern side of Front Royal Pike (Rt. 522) adjacent to the Tasker Woods Land Use Plan. The Comprehensive Policy Plan identifies this area of the county for development of business/ industrial and residential land uses. Mr. Cheran stated that the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires an applicant to provide confirmation that an attempt was made to collocate on an existing telecommunications facility and possible co -location structures. He said the applicant has provided an inventory of existing facilities and possible co -location structures and has produced adequate documentation that those existing facilities were unsuitable for the proposed use. Mr. Cheran next read a list of recommended conditions, should the Commission find this use to be appropriate. Mr. Lynn Koerner, Consultant for Shenandoah Mobile Company, came forward as the representative for this application. Mr. Koerner also introduced Mr. Leonard Grise, Sight Acquisition Manager for Shentel, and Anthony S. Peralta, RF Engineer. Mr. Koerner said the tower is designed to provide coverage in the area along Route 522 and will provide capacity to the existing and upcoming residential areas in the northeast part of Stephens City. He said the service will benefit the establishments near Route 522 and Tasker Road, including Home Depot Distribution Center, Comcast, the offices on Marcel Drive, and the area around Armel Elementary School. In addition, he said the proposed site addresses the communication needs of the high traffic count roads in the area, as well as the residential and business developments. He further noted that the proposed site is located in an area where they have received complaints of degraded service and lack or loss of signal. Mr. Koerner said they have supplied an inventory of existing telecommunications facilities in the area and found them to be either unsuitable or they were already located on those facilities. Mr. Koerner added that the site had been fully evaluated by the agencies in accordance with the National Environmental Protection Act and the Virginia Department of Historical Resources and those agencies have determined there were no adverse affects on any eligible or National Register properties. Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing and called for any citizen who wished to speak concerning this CUP. The following persons came forward to speak: Mr. John Burleson, an adjoining property owner to the north, expressed various concerns, including health concerns resulting from microwaves coming off the tower, possible negative effects on surrounding property values, and concerns regarding the possibility of the tower interfering with household communications such as television and cell phones. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2660 Minutes of July 21, 2010 -5 - Mr. Wayne Hottel, an adjoining property owner to the east, was concerned because some of the surrounding neighbors had not received any notification regarding the proposed tower. Mr. Hottle said a 95 -foot tower will affect more neighbors than just the immediate adjoining properties and he thought more residences should have been informed. Referring to the applicant's presentation regarding customers' complaints of dropped calls, Mr. Hottle said he hasn't experienced dropped calls or insufficient service. No other citizen wished to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Mr. Lynn Grise, Site Acquisition Manager for Shentel, came forward to respond to some of the citizen comments. Regarding health issues, Mr. Grise said this is an FCC -licensed facility and they are well within the health standards placed on this facility. He said if the neighbors experience any interference with communications, Shentel will be required to fix the problem under FCC regulations. Mr. Grise added this is a widely -used frequency, currently used throughout the City, and there is no anticipated impact. Commissioner Crocket asked the applicant about AWL (Aircraft Warning Lights) on the tower. He understood that Winchester Regional Airport only requires lighting for towers exceeding 150 feet; however, he was concerned about the hospital's medivac helicopter. Commissioner Crocket believed it would be beneficial to have some modest AWL for safety, in the event a medivac helicopter needed to land in the vicinity of the tower. Other Commissioners agreed. Commissioner Oates raised a concern about the lights impacting the surrounding neighbors, particularly because the tower was only 95 feet in height. Commissioner Oates preferred to leave the lighting decision up to the airport. There ensued some discussion between the staff and Commissioners on the lighting issue and directing the lighting upward, away from adjoining residences, so it would not cause a nuisance. Mr. Cheran stated that the county code does cover tower lighting and this could be addressed at the site plan stage. Other Commissioners believed the lighting decision should be left up to the airport. Mr. Grise suggested that Shentel could easily light this tower with dual mode lighting according to the FAA Standards, if directed to do so by the Planning Commission; and if the County decides in the future they do not want the lighting because of citizen complaints, Shentel could simply turn off the lighting. Mr. Grise said the Planning Commission would need to mandate the lighting and also request it be turned off, if that was the desire. Chairman Wilmot directed that if the Commission was favorable to Mr. Grise's suggestion, that the Commission include the requirement for lighting as a condition of the CUP. Commissioner Ambrogi made a motion to approve CUP #04-10 of Shenandoah Mobile Company with the conditions set forth by the staff and with an additional condition that the tower be equipped with a beacon -type device. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit #04-10 for Shenandoah Mobile Company/ Timber Ridge Ministries for a 95 -foot monopole telecommunications tower at 2835 Front Royal Pike with the following conditions: Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2661 Minutes of July 21, 2010 am All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless service providers. A minor site pian shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within 12 months of abandonment of operation. In the even a telecommunications tower is not erected within 12 months of the approval of this conditional use permit (CUP), the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. Aircraft Warning Lights (AWL) shall be placed on the tower. (Note: Commissioners Mohn, Lemieux, and Madagan were absent from the meeting.) Conditional Use Permit #05-10 for AT&T Corporation/ Melissa Helsley-Hall and Wesley Helsley and Bradley Pollack, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for a 120 -foot lattice telecommuni- cations tower. The properties, zoned RP (Residential Performance), are located on the east side of Martinsburg Pike (Rt. 11 North), approximately '/4 mile northeast of Interstate 81, Exit 317. The properties are further identified with P.I.N. 43-A-130 and 43-A-132 in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Action — Recommended Approval with Conditions Zoning and Subdivision Administrator, Mark R. Cheran, reported that this applicant had previously applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for a 120 -foot monopole telecommunications facility on these properties, but was denied by the Board of Supervisors at their meeting on May 13, 2009. Mr. Cheran said the denial was based on the location of the facility within the Developmentally Sensitive Area (DSA) of the Northeast Land Use Plan (NELUP) and the surrounding historical sites. He said since that time, the Board of Supervisors updated the NELUP component of the Comprehensive Policy Plan and modified the DSA in this area of the NELUP; this occurred at the Board meeting on June 9, 2010. Mr. Cheran said the properties that are subject to the proposed CUP have been removed from the DSA. Mr. Cheran continued, stating that this new CUP is for a 120 -foot lattice -type commercial telecommunications facility on the same properties previously identified. Mr. Cheran said the proposed location is still within the NELUP as indicated in the Comprehensive Policy Plan. One of the primary objectives of the NELUP is for the development of industrial and commercial uses along the Route 11 North Corridor. He said these properties are located within the SWSA (Sewer and Water Service Area), but are located outside the UDA (Urban Development Area). Mr. Cheran noted that commercial telecommunications facilities in the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning District are allowed with a Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2662 Minutes of July 21, 2010 -7 - CUP. However, commercial telecommunications facilities may be subject to additional performance standards in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties. Mr. Cheran stated these performance standards are to ensure that scenic areas and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. In addition to these performance standards, the zoning ordinance requires that all proposed telecommunication facilities shall be of monopole -type construction. He said the Planning Commission may allow a lattice -type tower, provided that the tower is located outside the UDA and not adjacent to identified historic sites. Mr. Cheran reported that the Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) reviewed this application and had several concerns. He said the HRAB was most concerned with the visual impact of this proposed facility on the core battlefield area of the Second Battle of Winchester and the study area of Third Winchester. The HRAB also expressed a preference for a monopole facility with limited microwave dish mountings. Mr. Cheran stated that Planning Commission approval is needed for a lattice -type facility. Mr. Cheran read a list of recommended conditions, should the Commission find this request to be appropriate. Mr. Ty Lawson came forward on behalf of the applicants. Mr. Lawson spoke of several events that have occurred since the Planning Commission first considered this application over a year ago. He said the DSA line was moved, the Graystone property was rezoned, and Route 37 was realigned. He said the proposed location for this tower will be just inside the realignment for Route 37. Mr. Lawson noted that during the previous consideration of this tower, there was a misunderstanding about where the UDA line was located and consequently, a request for a lattice structure was not made. Mr. Lawson stated that with this new application, the proposed tower location is clearly outside of the UDA and the applicant is now eligible for that waiver. Mr. Lawson pointed out that the only negative comments the applicant has received are of a visual nature. Mr. Lawson said a typical monopole is greater than six feet at the base; whereas, the lattice tower was less visually intrusive because one can see through it. Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing and called for citizen comments. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion of the hearing. Commissioner Unger referred to the PowerPoint photograph depicting a tower with several dishes attached. Commissioner Unger asked why the tower had to be so much taller than where the dishes were located on the tower. Commission members questioned if the applicant had intentions of placing additional dishes towards the top of the tower. Mr. Robert (Bob) Erickson, AT&T representative, said the dishes are set at the height they currently need to be. He said the tower height allows for some flexibility in case the dishes need to be moved up in the event an obstruction blocks the point-to-point communication between the tower and the mountain. Mr. Lawson added that any modification of the tower would require the applicant to go back through the CUP process, which could become a challenge. Furthermore, he said the tower must be available for collocation. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2663 Minutes of July 21, 2010 Commissioner Crockett asked the applicant about AWL (Aircraft Warning Lights) on the tower. He understood that Winchester Regional Airport only requires lighting for towers exceeding 150 feet; however, he was concerned about the hospital's medivac helicopter. Commissioner Crocket believed it would be beneficial to have some modest AWL for safety, in the event a medivac helicopter needed to land in the vicinity of the tower. Other Commissioners agreed. Mr. Lawson stated that since the only negative comments the applicants received about the tower were of a visual nature, he was concerned the lights would draw attention to the tower. However, he said the applicant would comply with whatever the Planning Commission desired. Commission opinions varied on whether the lattice tower or the monopole was less visually obtrusive than the other. Commissioners asked for additional specificity on the diameter of the monopole at its base and the cross section of the lattice tower at the base. Commissioner Thomas believed the tower should be lighted due to its proximity to the Route 37 expansion. He said if there is a concern about emergency medivac helicopters on Route 522 South, this location has much more potential for accidents between I-81, Route 37, and Route 11. He believed the tower should be lighted at 120 feet for safety. In addition, considering the massiveness of a monopole tower versus the area of the lattice tower, he said the issue is a 100 -square -foot base versus less than a 40 square -foot base; so the area of the base will be less than 40% with a monopole tower than a lattice tower. Commissioner Thomas believed the visual obviousness of the monopole tower will be less than the lattice tower, he said a monopole tower doesn't jump out in the viewscape as quickly as a lattice tower. He said he was in favor of the tower; he was not in favor of the lattice tower. Commissioner Oates said that when this came before the Commission last year, there was a waiver request for the lattice tower; however, it was passed as a monopole. Commissioner Oates said he agreed with that decision and preferred to see a monopole. Commissioner Oates made a motion not to waive the monopole requirement. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously passed. Commissioner Oates made a motion to recommend approval of CUP #05-10 with the conditions as recommended by the staff, plus the addition of Condition #8, The tower shall be lighted and if neighbors object to the lighting, the CUP shall be brought back before the Commission; Condition #9, The tower shall be a monopole -type construction; and, Condition #10, The tower shall be limited to two microwave dishes, which will not interfere with Condition #2, the number of service providers. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kriz and unanimously passed. Chairman Wilmot conferred with the applicant's representative about the additional conditions and the applicant was in agreement with those conditions. BE IT RESOLVED, that the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Conditional Use Permit #05-10 for AT&T Corporation/ Melissa Helsley-Hall and Wesley Helsley and Bradley Pollack, submitted by Greenway Engineering, for a 120 -foot monopole telecommunications tower with the following conditions: Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2664 Minutes of July 21, 2010 Wz 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. Prior to site plan approval, properties must be consolidated. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within 12 months of abandonment of operation. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within 12 months of the approval of this conditional use permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new conditional use permit. 8. Aircraft Warning Lights (AWL) shall be placed on the tower. 9. The tower shall be a monopole -type construction. 10. The tower shall be limited to two microwave dishes, which shall not interfere with Condition #2, the number of service providers. (Note: Commissioners Mohn, Lemieux, and Madagan were absent from the meeting.) OTHER CANCELLATION OF THE AUGUST 4, 2010 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Chairman Wilmot announced the cancellation of the Planning Commission's August 4, 2010 meeting. There were no applications pending or other items for consideration or discussion. Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2665 Minutes of July 21, 2010 ADJOURNMENT No further business remained to be discussed and the meeting adjourned at 7:55 p.m. by a unanimous vote. Respectfully submitted, June M. Wilmot, Chainnan Eric R. Lawrence, Secretary Frederick County Planning Commission Page 2666 Minutes of July 21, 2010 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #06-10 DEBRA BROUGHEAR Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: August 6, 2010 Staff Contact: Dana M. Johnston, Zoning Inspector This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 09/01/10 Pending Board of Supervisors: 09/22/10 Pending EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request for a Cottage Occupation — Hair Salon and an Off -Premise Sign. Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following conditions be placed on the CUP: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. Hours of operation shall be permitted from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. Employees shall be limited to those residing on the property. No other employees are permitted. 4. House may not have more than four occupants/dwellers while hair salon remains in business. 5. Hair salon is limited to five customers per day. 6. Only one sign shall be allowed. This off premise sign shall be located at the site's southern entrance onto Back Mountain Road. The sign shall not exceed five feet in height, the sign face shall not exceed four square feet in area. 7. Any expansion or change of use will require a new Conditional Use permit. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. Page 2 CUP #06-10, Debra Broughear August 6, 2010 LOCATION: This property is located at 376 Back Mountain Road (Route 614). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 40 -A -111,40-A-112 PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Area) Land Use: Residential ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: North: RA (Rural Area) Land Use: Vacant South: RA (Rural Area) Land Use: Residential East: RA (Rural Area) Land Use: Residential West: RA (Rural Area) Land Use: Vacant PROPOSED USE: This application is for a Cottage Occupation — Hair Salon and Off -Premise Sign. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 614, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Due to the projected low volume of trips generated, the existing "southern entrance" is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future or if trip generations exceed the applicant's projections, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. Frederick County Fire Marshall: Plans approved as submitted. Frederick County Inspections: Existing building area shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code, The International Existing Building Code and Section 304, use group B (Business) of the International Building Code. Other Code that applies is ICC/ANSI A117.1- 03 Usable and Accessible Buildings and Facilities. Please submit a floor plan for change of use building permit showing the area of the home to be utilized. Including the area utilized for accessibility when required. Signs shall require details at the time of Building Permit application. Page 3 CUP #06-10, Debra Broughear August 6, 2010 Frederick -Winchester Health Department: The Health Department approves the request with conditions: 1) Permit becomes null and void with change of ownership of the property. 2) House may not have more than four occupants/dwellers while salon remains in business. 3) Salon is limited to five customers per day. Planning and Zoning: A hair salon is a permitted use as a cottage occupation in the RA (Rural Areas) zoning district with an approved Conditional Use Permit. The proposed use will take place on a 64 acre parcel located in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. There is currently one dwelling located on the property. There are two entrances to the property; it is preferred the southern entrance be used for safe vehicle ingress and egress. At this southern entrance there will also be an off -premise sign no larger than four square feet in area, and five feet in height. The room to be used for the proposed use is equipped with one hair salon sink and one hair salon chair, which would accommodate only allowing one customer at a time. The property is surrounded by RA -zoned property with some mature woods. The closest dwelling is approximately 870 feet from the location of the proposed use. The proposed use will take place within the applicant's dwelling in a 7 foot by 14 foot room, accessed by an exterior door leading to a paved driveway. The applicant has agreed to limit the hours and days of operation, as well as the number of customers that will be seen each day. Based upon the limited scale of the proposed use and evaluation of the property, it appears this would not have any significant impacts on the adjoining properties. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 09/01/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would recommend the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. Hours of operation shall be permitted from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. 3. Employees shall be limited to those residing on the property. No other employees are permitted. 4. House may not have more than four occupants/dwellers while hair salon remains in business. 5. Hair salon is limited to five customers per day. 6. Only one sign shall be allowed. This off premise sign shall be located at the site's southern entrance onto Back Mountain Road. The sign shall not exceed five feet in Page 4 CUP #06-10, Debra Broughear August 6, 2010 height, the sign face shall not exceed four square feet in area. 7. Any expansion or change of use will require a new Conditional Use permit. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. f 5ET/ Conditional Use Permit 06 - 10 • w Y Debra Broughear 4 PIN#40-A- 111, 112 (Cottage Occupation Hair Salon & Off - Premise Sign) lltlrAl Prrelnretion Subdlvlglon; Thi Orchard iWeaarvation Loto 40WALtOBF 1 17 9aC ± �t ASD A 110 �t ROTI JOHNS i A 4w o A a4ned11461 ac, tX • � �( .,.� fir! ,� L . '- .4 _ _ '• s�, t'�j.'t} -, t �. ,a •, { v � 40- rA 171 S A b3 INHITEWH RRY JR tS C AROL •, ' r 1 PERR 9A MIN- ° •376 BACK Mt3UM'rAIN RD= Sti SBRCK�MO AIN RD t' � P..a zoned RA.:o�n16�ae. �i !. $ f• rr i co 1 Via, , •"'� � ' � � . , � �:>yR�,r,�• r 1 ! o � '� � ► t-�`,'—��.�'� �'� ata iF�t Inset Map Rurar_�pro,,Nlycanrer Mi (rd�sMcl, �h�asMcry Ttlwr1tlr17CN�tlIN,day MI jhd slid, Generd QsMclf ©Ub�5 P3 RItl�f+eTfArea RF ltesldanfial Palcrnmce D[striclj Ner rndYJO�r-'1-0 All Wglerbody F+w, wata<c,3n10a,e EasemaHs-Juna09_pretlsMeM ouMy 4Q C—tyRud?rese— ionLot 091, kvl4 k�-� 40 Caage Wcshingim Iwbond Forest M atlon Suixilvision: _s` dpi t -- L, N rvan¢n Lots` ,. o P P�dPl/S'y o- F. 4 C10 - r 0�11�44J , , t�''Pte,. •�! .. 5 ,r ti r Conditional Use Permit # 06 - 10 Note: Frederick County Dept of Debra Brolighear Planning & Development PIN #40-.4-111,112 W1 N Kent St Sub 202 10 (Cottage Occupation Winchester, 111226.1 Hair Salon & Off - Premise Sign) 540 ,665-5651 Map Created: July 30. 2010 0 125250 00 � 5Feet r Submittal Deadl P/C Meeting BOS Meeting APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA JUL 2 9 2010 1. Applicant (The applicant if the owner —y other) NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE U 2. Please list all owners, occupants (adult individuals as well as any entities occupying the property), or parties in the interest of the property: F- 3. The property is located at: (please give exact directions and include the route number of. your road or street) -I- 4. The property has a road frontage of E '`� feet and a depth of C Qgoo +- feet and consists of (� acres. (Please be exact) 5. The property is owned by f t'A(: � � ..fin as evidenced by deed from /�P_ �,r� �' of ��'- recorded ( revious owner) i recorded in the r e cGottt , C-eu-nty- _o f Frederick. IV STry OT - k IV 5G 3 6. Tax(Parcel)Identification (T . D.) No . Magisterial District 0-(L- Cud< Current Zoning 04 , 7. Adjoining Property: USE North A9 East South West ZONING - Aq .y a 8. The type of use proposed is (consult with the Planning Dept, before completing) 9. It is proposed that the following buildings will be constructed: Ncrtti 10. The following are all of the individuals, firms, or corporations owning property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property where the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: NAME S -Ju jjp_� M i2r i?- 2i c ADDRESS Ill (,IM-.StMv l IfrtC n U,4 PROPERTY ID# . q 9 '7nn -6� 3 2,,) V E P-)+ 'Z NAME �;to hA.) bj ADDRESS C & L- 5- /J?eail'ngnt� IRit_f 1,Jxr2c.IfA- zzMcz PROPERTY ID# G NAME Ligi 41 &V'wk -r Clef i ll ADDRESS3 15` f k-.1711-44Gt me . t14- Zz4. pZ PROPERTY ID# �16 - /1 J 08) NAME (.,`�'�1 ��CS 111e.1 Tf - ADDRESS ,)Gf1i311111141-k l'o'ne t!Jrizc ZZ41c e - PROPERTY ID# ' O " - y NAME Ch 149-A4 64 V 4 K(ADDRESS .r°�3 / 10 bu ncn-t4 crlC - Y'�A' - PROPERTY ID# NAME i ky ADDRESS CSC Ht)[stq ICS a r (2�i PROPERTY ID#�(� I ems' nG v - 1 ;Z NAMES `F'�� C� 5 f.() I ADDRESS ` PROPERTY ID# "% 1 6L)cnc- v ZvU7C NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 11. Please use this page for your sketch of the property. Show proposed and/or existing structures on the property, including measurements to all property lines. IUB SCSI �� IJCC ,6Co6M _ P� (c), f� 4)l-rT- - -t)E n�i �IbLss rk71 JAJ 6 P-037-' COUNTY CUTS a-1 bE6 CUMBERLAND PIPE AND STEEL SUPPLY CO. Upper -Potomac Industrial Park - P.O. Box 1320 Cumberland Maryland 21502-1320 (301)729-6100 Effm Toll Free (800) 644-2862 Fax: (301) 729-6211 Aug 1 6;=,20 o h \r (L- T03kQ_ 6 0 �\C H � P `i t 1 n CUMBERLAND PIPE AND STEEL SUPPLY CO. Beams • Angle • Channel • Rebar • Tubes • Flats • Sheet & Plate Hot & Cold Rolled Rounds • Squares • Bar Grating • Fxpanded Metal • Safety Plate I J • • CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #07-10 10� Coo GLOBAL TOWER ASSETS LLC w Staff Report for the Planning Commission Prepared: August 9, 2010 Staff Contact: Mark R. Cheran, Zoning Administrator This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Reviewed Action Planning Commission: 09/01/10 Pending Board of Supervisors: 09/22/10 Pending EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request to seek approval for the construction of a 250 foot self-supporting, lattice -type commercial telecommunications facility. Staff would note that the proposed site does qualify for a Planning Commission waiver from the monopole tower requirements in order to utilize a self- supporting lattice tower. Two Planning Commission actions are requested. • Approval or denial of a waiver of the monopole tower requirement so that a self- supporting lattice -type tower could be used. • Should the Planning Commission find this CUP appropriate, Staff would suggest the following conditions be placed on the CUP: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. Page 2 Conditional Use Permit #07-10 ('global Tower Assets LLC August 9, 2010 LOCATION: This property is located at the intersection of Brill Road (Route 603) and Highway 55. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 69 -A -7F PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) South: RA (Rural Areas) East: RA (Rural Areas) West: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Vacant Land Use: Vacant Land Use: Residential Land Use: Residential PROPOSED USE: This application is for a 250 foot self-supporting, lattice -type telecommunication facility. REVIEW EVALUATIONS: Virginia Department of Transportation: The application for a Conditional Use Permit for this property appears to have little measurable impact on Route 603, the VDOT facility which would provide access to the property. Existing entrance is adequate for proposed use. However, should use ever expand in the future, the entrance may have to be upgraded to VDOT commercial standards. Fire and Rescue: Plan approval recommended. Inspections Department: Structure shall comply with The Virginia Uniform Statewide Building Code and Section 312, use group U (Utility and Miscellaneous) of The International Building Code 2006. The structure is required to comply with Chap 15 & 16 of the IBC 2006 for structural load, as well as Section 3108 for Towers. The tower shall be located and equipped Page 3 Conditional Use Permit #07-10 Global Tower Assets LLC August 9, 2010 with step bolts and ladders so as to provide ready access for inspection purposes. The tower shall not cross or encroach upon any street or other public space, or encroach upon any privately owned property without written consent of the owner of the encroached -upon property. (See 3108.2, Location and Access.) Special instructions per Chap 17 IBC 2006 apply to this structure. Snow bridging requires a building permit. Relocation/additional antennas require a building permit. Plans submitted for review shall be sealed by a Virginia Registered Design Professional. Winchester Regional Airport: Due to the elevation of the site at 1,025 feet, the proposed structure height of 250 feet, the proposed tower penetrates the Horizontal Surface Elevation of 876 feet of the Part 77 surfaces of the airport. Applicant has filed the required 7640-1 with the Federal Aviation Administration for review and approval. A copy of the FAA determination on Aeronautical Study No. 2010 -AEA -2825 -OE is attached for reference to this comment letter. In accordance with FAA Aeronautical Study No. 2010 -AEA -2825 -OE, the proposed tower is being required to be marked and/or lighted in accordance with FAA Advisory circular 70/7460-1K Change 2. Obstruction Marking and Lighting, a med-dual system — Chapters 4, 8 (M -Dual) and 12. In addition, the FAA is requiring filing of Form 7460-2, Notice of Actual Construction or Alteration, be completed and returned to their office any time the project is abandoned or within five days after the construction reaches the greatest height (7460-2, Part II). Any temporary construction equipment exceeding the overall heiltht of the structure including all appurtenances will require filing of a separate 7460-1 form with the FAA before construction begins for review and approval. During the construction phase, all cranes will be required to have an aviation obstruction flag and an obstruction light visible during daylight operations and must be lowered at night unless lit, in accordance with FAA guidelines. Intended hours and dates of operation should be coordinated with David Foley, Operations Supervisor Winchester Regional Airport Authority no less than forty-eight hours prior to start so that a Notice to Airmen can be issued. On behalf of the Winchester Regional Airport Authority, we are requesting that the tower be marked with lighting in accordance with all FAA regulations and guidelines and the FAA comments provided in the referenced aeronautical study be complied with at all times as a condition of approval for this Conditional Use Permit. Planninlz and Zoning: The 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan of Frederick County ("Comprehensive Plan") provides guidance when considering land use actions. This proposed 250 foot self-supporting commercial telecommunication facility is located on property indentified within the Comprehensive Plan to remain rural and is not part of any land study. The properties immediately adjacent to this proposed CUP are currently zoned RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District. The applicant has applied for a Conditional Use Permit for a 250 foot lattice - type commercial telecommunications facility on a ten acre property, with the nearest dwelling(s) being more than 200 feet from this facility. The Planning Commission may allow a lattice -type telecommunication tower provided that the tower is located outside the UDA and not adjacent to identified historic sites. Page 4 Conditional Use Permit 407-10 Global Tower Assets LLC August 9, 2010 The Frederick County Zoning Ordinance allows for commercial telecommunication facilities in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). Commercial telecommunication facilities are subject to additional performance standards in order to promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties, residential properties, land use patterns, scenic areas and properties of significant promote orderly economic development and mitigate the negative impacts to adjoining properties. These performance standards are to ensure that scenic areas and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted. In addition to these performance standards, the zoning ordinance requires that all proposed telecommunication facilities shall be of a monopole -type construction. There are no properties of significant historical value or any historical sites adjacent to this proposed use. Furthermore, the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance requires an applicant to provide confirmation that an attempt was made to collocate on an existing telecommunication facility, and possible co -location structures. The applicant has provided an inventory of existing telecommunication facilities, and no other telecommunication facilities or possible co -location opportunity structures exist in this area. This proposed commercial telecommunication facility will be positioned to provide the existing and future land uses in this area of the County with telecommunication needs. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 09/01/10 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: This is a request to seek approval for the construction of a 250 foot self-supporting, lattice -type commercial telecommunications facility. Staff would note that the proposed site does qualify for a Planning Commission waiver from the monopole tower requirements in order to utilize a self- supporting lattice tower. Two Planning Commission actions are requested. • Approval or denial of a waiver of the monopole tower requirement so that a self- supporting lattice -type tower could be used. • Should the Planning Commission find this CUP appropriate, Staff would suggest the following conditions be placed on the CUP: 2. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless services providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. Page 5 Conditional Use Permit #07-10 Global Tower Assets LLC August 9, 2010 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within twelve (12) months of abandonment of operation. 5. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within twelve (12) months of the approval of this Conditional Use Permit, the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. Any expansion or modification of this use will require a new Conditional Use Permit. Following the requisite public hearing, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors. a@ 145 Inset P'Aap 55 F7 Parcel: mnI,g R -1c. r—lyCenter M I Ilndusl.id, Llghl Dkid,!) low�cndCilyeounaary M211nduslrid, General �Istricl) �Wh— D...I.P-1 Area RP (Residential PeAo, —. of°Incl) '9ewe, and Water Service Araa LS Watebody Winchester, VA 22601 1i Wa'er Centerline 540 -665-5651 Easements_June09 ErederickCounly Map Created: August 16, 2010 '`� CaunlyRvralPreservclionLots F�-fj5cenic Rimers N,tional_R—ts 69 Conditional Use Permit #07- 10 W, . GIOhaa Tnwimr Ac.-sefs i.LC (250ft self support ' felc` Orr tower) 4 - a�. c t Approx Tower Location CIO O �[5`3A ♦.,. L r0, ,3�pi? u $g- <� v Planning & Development G' Suite 202 Suite Winchester, VA 22601 'Rq I4 StRr��g�R�� AWN 'O , kk- 20 Rglo BR// dgR� 4C i Conditional Use Permit #07-10 Global Tower Assets, LLC PIN #69 -A -7F (250ft self support telcom tower) 0 125 250 500 Feet Note: Frederick County Dept of Planning & Development N Kent St Suite 202 Suite Winchester, VA 22601 540 -665-5651 Map Created: August 16, 2010 E a i" L AUC' 5 2010 b� t tal Deadline 4 J v CMee.i n a 9 A A�i'I0N- -F0R- -GOWA AL USE PERM.C`_i' FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA Aou_icant (T_'a.e acn Cant __� t^e py:r_rer X o- her) - _- _: NTM1i Global Tower Assets LLC ADDRESS: 750 Park of Commerce Blvd, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33407 Acquisition Contractor 540-335-0030 Corporate Office 561-886-3956 2. _ _--ase_ s i ^Fr^er5: oc-_unanCB ad _1 _nd`L T-0Ia_s as s,,e I1 -� -les CCcl�lcy= �l P o_nr,e£-Lv) j v� pa rl- es inn ane - nreres: of LI' ✓f`rr+ic �'"l-li - Robert B_ and Regina A. Martin (Owners) Global Tower Asset's (Contractor Purchaser) -e O_"O'oer--Y Is ccated _.�: r].:a-ease C' yi ex. --- Cit r --c 1 "'" _uae^'r r` uu�'=le rber Cf yQu-- r`oa ,or st ree_� The intersection of Brill Road (State Road 603) and Highway 55. From I-81 Exit 296, proceed West towards Wardensville for 10 2/10 miles on Highway 55, Wardensville Pike and turn left on Brill Road (State Road 603). Proceed 200 yards and make a hard right turn on Old Brill Road. Proceed 150 yards and turn left to access gate. Proceed through gate to site. = -e crcoefty has a road fro. to e c_ 754 feer Gra aeiDth of 985.94 =eet conc�s:s of 10.010 mac_ (- - ease be exact) The pro-Qe zy Is owneu: by Robert R. and Regina A. Martin as evioe^cec ,0y ceec -_rcn Raymond E. & Shirley A. Brill recorcie LR040015768 (Prev_cus Cwner) in deed cccK �_c. c nace as reccraea -n the re -oras e.= the C -e r{ of P_ C rCu-t 0i-_, Co-untV O- 6. Tax (Parcel) i c=ent-`ica on ;_. D..) iJ-c. 69 -A -7F Record ID: 0040038 Magister -La I D_stri c�- Back Creek Curren±' Zcnirg, Rural Area - (Use - vacant) 7. djjolnin,) Property: ZONING USE North Residential East Vacant South Residential / Vacant West Residential ZONING Rural Area Rural Area Rural Area Rural Area S. The type of use proposed is (consult witli dhe Planning Dept. before completing) Construction of a 250 foot self support telecommunications tower in a 100' X 100' equipment compound area with related telecommunications equipment. _ 9. it is proposed that the following buildings till be constructed: No buildings are proposed at this time. The outdoor radio equipment will be placed on a concrete_pad within the--- lop, he_`lonf X i n a' erqu ipment-.... c�mp£)Llzlcl 10. The followingare all of the individuals- firms_ or corporations ov'r►ling property adjacent to both sides and rear and in front of (across street from) the property v here the requested use will be conducted. (Continue on back if necessary.) These people will be notified by mail of this application: N?AIVIE Louis E. Lacaria 909 wardensville Pike ADDRESS Star Tannery, VA 22654 PROPERTYID� 69-A-6 Record ID 21685 1412 N. Pifer Road NAIX,IE Dennis M. Tharpe ADDRESS Star Tannery, VA 22654 PROPERTY 1134 69 -A -7E Record ID 38653 225 Brill Road NAME Robert E. & Destiny Teets ADDRESS Star Tannery, VA 22654 PROPFRTYID# 69-5-1.1 Record ID 37501 240 Brill Road NAi1;II Diane A. Jackson ADW -ESS Star Tannery, VA 22654 PROPERTYID# 69 -A -7I Record ID 45148 NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# 'NAME ADDRESS PROPERTY ID# I ]. Please use this pare For .your sketch of the property. Shoe proposed andlor clist'n� structures an the property. including measurements to all property lines. SURVEY ON NEXT PAGE AND ALSO SEE FULL SET OF CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS ATTACHED 12. Additional comments, if any: The proposed telecommunications tower is located outside the Urban Development Area and is not adjacent to prQperties that are identified historical sites The tower height of 250 foot is necessary to provide carriers with the needed antenna height to be able to provide connectivity to adjoining sites. Request approval for self support/lattice design structure I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the governing body of Frederick County, Virginia to allow the use described in this application. I understand that the sign issued to me when this application is submitted must be placed at the front property line at least seven (7) clays prior to the first public hearing and maintained so as to be visible until after the Board of Supervisors' public hearing. Your application for a Conditional Use Permit authorizes any member of the Frederick County Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors or Planning and Development Department to inspect your property where the proposed use will be conducted. Signature of Applicant Si stature ofO��rtler41; ?�4, �P 1 9 !�` `"t i �GZ irt` Sr►�G� g Martins: 19 west Fairfax St, Berryville, V 2261 Global Tower Assets LLC: 750 park of Commerce Blvd, Suite 300 ON n1erS' Mailing Address Boca Raton. VT "434()7 Martin: 540-270-9930 Owners' Telephone No. Global: 561-886-3956 Applicant Contact: Lynn Koerner, Contractor for Global Tower Assets, LLC., 3126 South ox Road, Edinburg, VA 22824 Phone: 540-335-OD30 TO BE COMPLETED BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR USE CODE: RENEWAL DATE: Special Limited Power of Attorney County of Frederick, Virginia Frederick Planning Web Site: www.eo.frederick.va.us Department of Planning & Development, County of Frederick, Virginia, 107 Forth Kent Street, Suite 202, Winchester, Virginia 22601 Phone 540-665-5651 facsimile 540-665-6395 Know All Men By Those Present: That I (We) (Nanic) Robert B. Martin (Phone) 540-270-9930 (Address) 19 West Fairfax Street, Berryville, VA 22611 the owner(s) of ail those tracts or parcels of land ("Property") conveyed to me (tis), by deed recorded in the Clerk's Office of the Circuit Court of the County of Frederick, Virginia, by Instrument No. LR 0 4 - 0 015 7 6 20n pXX and is described as Map 69 Parcel: 7F Lot: Block: Section: Subdivision: do hereby make, constitute and appoint: (Name) Lynn Koerner (Phone) 540-335-0030 (Address) 3126 South Ox Road, Edinburg, VA 22824 To act as my true and laivfiil attorney-in-fact for and in my (our) name, place, and stead Nvith full power and authority I (ive) would have if acting personally to file planning applications for my (our) above described Property, including: MXXXK&MM4"l Wg*WXW IN Conditional Use Permits [1XXXXKMyj4WXX 9 Site Plan My attorney-in-fact shall have the authority to offer proffered conditions and to make amendments to previously approved proffered conditions except as follows: N/A This authorization shall expire one year from the day it is signed, or until it is otherwise rescinded or modified. 1 In witness thereof, ! (w } h ve 1;7 s$113our and and sea] this day of , Signature(s) -' Sof Virginia, City oon of , _ , To -wit: .••.1 •_� P 1 ;moi a Notary Public in and for the jurisdiction mal e4-1 ,certif%, that the persons) � lio signed to the foregoing instrtuileut personally al eared before me !' rok ikno�vledged the same before me in the jurisdiction aforesaid this jl�' day of .440 My Commission Expires: gt �14..liC SocAcgarsm nt and Pro�ectDerelopmenr Contractor.for Global Tower Partners August 5, 2010 Frederick County Department of Planning and Development 107 Forth Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, VA 22601 Re: Letter of Justification - Conditional Use Permit Application for Global Tower Assets, LLC — Site VA5133 —1-81 - Middletown Tax Parcel 69 -((A)) -7F - Adjacent to Wardensville Pike Owner: Robert and Regina Martin Contract Owner: Global Tower Assets, LLC Dear Mr. Cheran: Global Tourer Assets (GTP) is proposing to build a 250 foot self support structure on the property located at the intersection of Brill Road and RT55, Star Tannery. This tower site is primarily placed at this location to provide a platform for the various wireless carriers to connect to the Clear Channel tower which is east of the proposed location located off of Cottontown Road in Shenandoah County and west to the Old AT&T, Craun LLC tower located on the VAJWV state line. No other telecommunication facilities or possible co -location opportunity structures exist in this area. The proposed site is located in an area that has had carrier complaints of non-existent or very degraded service and loss of signal strength. The search ring objective, competing sites list and vicinity map are attached as Attachment 1. This tower location will provide carrier coverage to the surrounding roads and residential areas. CUP Application GTP- A5133 Page 2 August 5 2010 Attached as Attachment 2 is an RF Brief with plots that represent the current coverage and projected coverage from our anchor tenant. Note on the RF plots the reference to Site 439 being on air_ This site is currently under development as a co -location and a building permit application will be submitted in the near future. The carriers RF Brief also outlines their purpose and intent and the recommendation for the site at a "minimum" height of 199 feet. The anchor tenant has requested a "minimum" antenna height of 199 feet to meet their coverage objective for the area. For this reason, we are proposing the tower to be 250 feet in height which will allow compliance with the standard conditions placed on the CUP for collocating of additional carriers. The tower site is located outside the Urban Development Area and it is requested that a self support/lattice type structure be approved in lieu of the monopole design to allow for the additional carriers. Standard monopole structures are typically limited in height to 200 feet. The key points regarding the need for this telecommunications facility at this location are: it is necessary to provide coverage and connectivity in the area in which it is proposed. 2. Signal engineering from the anchor tenant shows an area of inadequate service in this area. 3. Statistical operating data of the existing wireless network creates a compelling need for service in this area 4. The carriers, AT&T and Shentel, have placed, or are in the process of establishing facilities at the towers previously mentioned as owned by Clear Channel and Craun, LLC. There are no other existing facilities in this area that would provide the necessary platform to fulfill the needs in this particular area and fill the gap to provide contiguous service. 5. This site addresses communications needs of the high traffic -count roads in the area as well as the residential areas. 6. The tower needs to be of a self support/lattice design due to the height needed for adequate carrier coverage. CUP Application VA5133 Page 3 August 5, 2010 It is the ongoing policy and objective of Global Tower Assets LLC to make the tower available to other wireless service providers for co -location. The proposed tower will be engineered to accommodate a minimum of three (3) wireless carriers, thus reducing the need for additional towers in the area. In order to insure the maximum set back from the adjoining property owners, Global Tower has elected to purchase the entire 10 acre parcel and has sited the tower near the center of the parcel. By doing so, we expect adjoining properties will have zero visual impact from the installation of the tower. The evaluation process has been initiated for evaluation by the mandated agencies in accordance with the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). As part of that evaluation, the Virginia Department of Historical Resources (DHR) will review the information to be submitted by The Ottery Group under the provisions of Section 106 with the expectation that the proposed site will have "No adverse effect' on historic properties listed in or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. This site is consistent with planned growth, and planned growth calls for development of infrastructure. Sites like this are necessary components of the communications infrastructure. This site can provide DSL quality (commonly called 3G or EVDO) wireless broadband Internet to the area and, it establishes the p!atform to introduce advanced WiMax and/or LTE wireless broadband service at speeds up to 70 Mbits/s and 326.4 Mbit/s, respectively. Global Tower Assets LLC requests your favorable review and positive recommendation to the Board of Supervisors. Please contact me should you have questions or require additional information. Sincerely yours, Lyn Koerner Site Acquisition and Project Development Contractor for Global Tower LCC Search Area Ring Qvrc KIAnnc. H I t ID: FT -I Palau t liit Hybrid QQ -nil R y 4F ' t 's 5. ; n Site ID Latitude D Longitude (Deg)GE ft Pro Sitet 39-8-".724 N 78-28_3,3954 W 2132 Rad Center ft Min GE ft Max RC ft Min RC ft Site Type 160 2132 213 165 MIA Site Objectives: To provide continued coverage on Hwy 55 between Strasburg and Wardensville Additional Comments: al (znd!gaa 5 ihcr-.i Id b _` ° 1VE_: °.!Iron _ ll1 ti?A;9t 4 . .. Noir, GE ft 1 ?F�rG..liTliiC.. �4'eiu , taken f"orn digfO7I ,Oteflail. Engineer: R8feq Ahmed Release #: 1 Release Date: 04115/10 Approval Date: H Completing Structure Analysis (Existing Towers, Rooftops, Water Tanks, etc.....) Existinff/Comnetine Structure #1 Tower Owner/Tower ID: Distance from proposed GTP Tower: AGL: Latitude/Longitude: Est. Space Availability/Capacity: Which Carriers are on Tower: Existing/Competing Structure #6 Tower Owner/Tower ID: Tower Owner/Tower ID: Clear Channel (Cottontown Rd - Sheandoah County) Distance from proposed GTP Tower: AGL: 178' Self Support Latitude/Longitude: N39-03-5625 (N39.0656) / W78-22-5755 (78.38265) Est. Space Availability/Capacity: At capacity Which Carriers are on Tower: AT&T / Shentel(Sprint) / Clear Channel Radio(WFQX-FM) Existing/Competing Structure #2 Tower Owner/Tower ID: Old AT&T Microwave Tower (Craun LLC - WV State Line) Distance from proposed GTP Tower: AGL: 115 foot Self support Latitude/Longitude: N39-06-04.11 (N39. 1011) / W78-29-42.20 (W78.4950) Est. Space Availability/Capacity: Microwaves can be removed - No other antenna Which Carriers are on Tower: AT&T and Sprint/Shentel negotiating for use Existing/Competing Structure #3 Tower Owner/Tower ID: HTS (Wardensville - WV) Distance from proposed GTP Tower: AGL: 180 foot monopole Latitude/Longitude: N39-04-34.69 (N39.07636) / W78-35-00.70 (W78.58353) Est. Space AvailabilitylCapacity: At least 3 additional carriers Which Carriers are on Tower: Shentel(Sprint) Existine/Competing Structure #4 Tower Owner/Tower ID: Distance from proposed GTP Tower: AGL: Latitude/Longitude: Est. Space Availability/Capacity: Which Carriers are on Tower: Existing/Competing Structure #5 Tower Owner/Tower ID: Distance from proposed GTP Tower: AGL: Latitude/Longitude: Est. Space Availability/Capacity: Which Carriers are on Tower: Existing/Competing Structure #6 Tower Owner/Tower ID: 5. � R, 9 r c7,'' yfi Wrl F� fq � QR yIt !" '.Im Y jr C}I ATS a a, a�Sxw* i�y raw � irx f ri r' 4 P3 Y f 4- 1�T jqu RAs�rne�a..w y. o-7 Ycfi6co`�inn.o�nwu� Id AT'RY-'i T'ow'er) east to Clezr Chanced Tower near Lebanon Church gop I menet. DAA aela 207FG3 4112 =9, ZOO M, Ipn, -ia,32 Wrl F� fq � QR yIt !" '.Im Y jr C}I ATS a a, a�Sxw* i�y raw � irx f ri r' 4 P3 Y f 4- 1�T jqu RAs�rne�a..w y. o-7 Ycfi6co`�inn.o�nwu� Id AT'RY-'i T'ow'er) east to Clezr Chanced Tower near Lebanon Church r3f� Attachment 2 -Z -5 J. v_i Aug 2, 2010 RIF Brief Overview for the Proposed Wardensville Pike Site Shentet is proposing to build a PCS cell site near Hwy 55 Wardensville Pike and State Route 603 Brill Road intersection. The purpose of this site is to provide highway coverage along Hwy 55 thus extending Shentel's coverage footprint Further west towards the West Virginia state line and on to Wardensville, WV. The proposed PCS site (Site Number: WA12SH714A) referred to as "Wardensville Pike" is located at coordinates: Latitude: 39° 05'46.72" N and Longitude: 78° 27'01.22" W_ The site address is 200 Brill Road, Star Tannery,VA 22654_ The PCS antennas will be co -located on the proposed 250 -ft self- support tower being proposed by Global Tower Partners, GTP. The RF signal strength simulation study shows that the minimum height required for antenna deployment at this location to meet the coverage objective is 199 feet. A height lower than this would result in less than the desired signal strength because of the terrain and clutter limitations. The loss in signal strength occurs because of the fact that the radio frequency signals, in general, are very susceptible to objects in their path such as buildings, trees & foliage and vehicles etc- In addition, RF signals degrade in strength as distance increases between transmit and receive antennas even when there is no obstruction present in the path between the antennas. The result of RF signal strength simulations are shown in the plots enclosed_ Take note of the site shown in the map as 439A which is currently under development and is a cc -location an an existing tower near the state line. The RF simulation map labeled as "Coverage of Existing Sites without Site 714A" shows the current covered area_ The RF simulation map labeled as "Coverage of Existing Sites with Site 714A" shows coverage from the proposed PCS site when the antennas are deployed at a height of 199 ft above ground level (AG!_) along with the coverage from existing Shentel sites in the neighboring places. The RF simulation map labeled as "Coverage of Site 714A without Existing Sites" shows coverage only from the proposed PCS site when the antennas are deployed at a height of 199 ft above ground level. 2 LOCAL AI.JD LOhIL DISTAIJCE TELEPHONE li J i ERIJET AF10 L+aTA. SPRVI=ES CABLE TELEViSiOH 4;+IRELESS VOICE AND DATA SERVICES • ALARM trJ01JITCPXJ -, , TELECOI.14HU1'JICATIOI'JS EQUIPI;,IEPJT V -!E Iv1UST SERVE !0dC-LL TO PROSPER • WL 6:IUST PROSP[I3 TG SERVF WELL Page two The colors "yellow" and "green" in the RF simulation maps represent the strength of RF signal in the given geographical area. The "yellow color" represents Irk -Building PCS coverage level — RF signal strength of -84 dBm while the "green color" represents In -Vehicle PCS coverage level — RF signal strength of -98 dBm. The In -Building PCS coverage level warrants uninterrupted service to the user who is using a PCS device in -door when little or no interference is present. Similarly, the In -Vehicle PCS coverage level warrants uninterrupted service to the user who is using a PCS device while traveling in vehicle if little or no interference is present. Shentel complies with all FCC guidelines and standards for Radio Frequency (RF) emissions. Shentel will operate. maintain and monitor this PCS cell site under the rules and guidelines of the FCC. In conclusion, it is evident from the RF simulation maps that this PCS cell site would provide highway coverage to commuter traffic along Hwy 55. Considering the purpose and extent of the site coverage, the RF engineers at Shentei recommend that a PCS site with antenna located at a minimum height of 199 ft AGL be built at the proposed site location_ The proposed PCS site, along with Site 439A, will provide adequate road coverage along Hwy 55, thus fulfilling Shentel's desired coverage objective and meet company standards for reliable wireless service. Anthony S. Peralta Shentel — RF Engineer office: (544) 9845426 Fax: (540) 964-5493 LEGEND IN -BUILDING COVERAGE (-84 dBm) IN -VEHICLE COVERAGE (-98 d8m) BLUE SITES -existing on -air sites - BLACK SITES -future sites Site 439A was considered on -air in this plot to highlight coverage need for Site 7I4A CoverCover c*.tes age ol gAst"es, nrithout Site 714A & 439A LEGEND If 1 -Pi -Ill DING f7C`VFR.;,,G'--- (-,4 IF mt -LUL LEGEND IRI-BUILDING COVERAGE (-84 deal) IN-VEHICLE COVERAGE (-98 dBm) BLUE SITES _existing on-air sites BLACK SITES -future sites Coverage of Site 43 A A 2-M without Existing Sites k,WARDENSVILLE 367A LEGEND Ii I -F+ - I I L D I,' I G CO VER�GE- (-34 11F-mj -IF,-n) GENERAL NOTES 0 L 1. FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS, THE FOLLOWING DEFINITIONS SHALL APPLY: OWNER GLOBAL TOWER, LLC CONTRACTOR T.B.O. (CONSTRUCTION) 2. THE CONTRACTOR WHEN VISITING THE COMMUNICATION SITE SHALL FAMILIARIZE HIMSELF WITH THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPLISHED AS SHOWNON THE DRAWINGS. THE (TONCOMMENGINS GLOBAL "f OW E R ��O QQQM1 �n/AJ, �) L.+ O ^j/ LLC SHALLVER OND TIONSNPRIOR AN WORK. CALL AEXISTINGi 1 ()DY Jy DIMENSIONS OFFY CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS MUST BE VERIFIED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE CONTRACTOR OF 1- N 0'61 9 ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS OR PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. SINCE THE COMMUNICATION SITE IS ACTIVE, ALL SAFETY PRECAUTIONS MUST BE TAKEN WHEN WORKING AROUND HIGH LEVELS OF ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION, PERSONAL RE EXPOSURE MONITORS ARE ADVISED TO BE WORN TO ALERT OF ANY DANGEROUS EXPOSURE LEVELS. O 4` 3. All MATERIALS FURNISHED AND INSTALLED SHALL BE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH ALL VA5 1 33 1` 1 SS��N�Z. APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND ORDINANCES. THE SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRIATE NOTICES tCjCJ COMPLY WITH ALL LAWS, ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS, AND LAWFUL ORDERS OF ANYY PUBLIC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK. 4. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY WITH THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2006,LATEST EDITION. ALL MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH I-81 MIDDLETOWN ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL AND UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS ANO LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND APPLICABLE REGULATIONS. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH - NFPA-70 THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. 5. DRAWINGS PROVIDED FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE NOT TO BE SCALED._ 6, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE WORK SHALL 250' SELF SUPPORT TOWER APP OVAL LIST INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIAL, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES, AND LABOR NECESSARY TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLATIONS AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. SITE AQ 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL MATERIALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S ZONING o RE, RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFICALLY STATED OTHERWISE, CONSTR. MANAGER 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ACTUAL UTILITY ROUTING AND REFLECT THE ACTUAL ROUTE ON THE .REDLINED DRAWINGS. PROPERTY OWNER/REPII 1! n V PROJECT INFORMATION DRAWING INDEX 9. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT THE EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS, PAVEMENTS; CURBS, LANDSCAPING, AND STRUCTURES, ANY D.:MAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT THE SUBCONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER. REV. 10- THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEGALLY AND PROPERLY DISPOSE OF SCRAP MATERIALS OR SCOPE OF WORK: INSTALLATION OF A TOWER FOUNDATION, 250' SELF SUPPORT TOWER, 3 ANTENNAS, 5 RF TRANSMISSION LINES, EDU IPMENT SLAB ON GRADE, T•1 TITLE SHEET AND GENERAL NOTES ANY OTHER ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE EXISTING FACILITY. 2 COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT CABINETS, SITE GROUNDING, CHAIN LINK FENCE, SITE IHPROVEMENTS, LANDSCAPING, ELECTRICAL 1 Z•1 SITE PLAN 11. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL LEAVE PREMISES IN CLEAN AND TO IT"S ORIGINAL AND TELEPHONE APPURTENANCES AND CONDUITS TD UTILITY DEMARKS. 1 Z•2 COMPOUND PLAN AND TOWER ELEVATION ELEVASCHEDULEANDNOTES CONDITION. 72. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE SITE ADDRESS: 200 BRILL ROAD ( E911 ADDRESS) STAR TANNERY, Z•2 ANTENNAMOUNTANING DTOWE 1 i FOR OBTAINING ANY ADDITIONAL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FENCES, INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS, ICE BRIDGES, ETC. VA 22654 Z•4 STE DETAILS 1 LAn(uDE: N 39- 05' 45.976" ZONING. RA Z•5 EQUIPMENT CABINETS AND DETAILS 1 LONGITUDE: W 78' 26" 58.845'" PARCEL ID:. 59 -A -7F ELEVATION: 1242.33" AMSL AT CL TOWER BASE CURRENT USE; VACANT LAND / WOODED JURISDICTION: FREDERICK COUNTY, VA PROPOSED USE: TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY USE GROUP: U (UTILTIY AND HISC.) LAND AREA: 10.01 ACRES UTILITY COMPANY INFORMATION PROJECT DIRECTORY VICINITY MAP (9CALE:1•a16u01 ELECTRIC UTILITY: TELEPHONE COMPANY: PROPERTY OWNER: APPLICANT: ARCHITECT! ENGINEER DRIVING DIRECTIONS: ALLEGHENY POWER SHENANDOAH TELEPHONE PHONE: 800-355-3445 PHONE: 800-]43-6835 ROBERT B. ANO REGINA A. MARTIN GLOBAL TOWER, FROM BETHESDA, MD: PROCEED ON 1-495 SOUTH TO 1-66 WEST. MERGE ONTO 1-66 WEST. POLE NU1.18ER: 1094681 POLE NUMBER: 13/18/4 LLC ENTREX COMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INC. 19 WEST FAIRFAX STREET 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD TAKE EXIT 1A TO MERGE ONTO I-81 SOUTH TOWARD ROANOKE. TAKE EXIT 296 FOR VA-48/VA-55 TOWARDS STRASBURG. FROM EXIT BERRYVILLE VA 22611 SUITE 300 WAS EYE N, NW WASHINGTON, DC 20005 296 -81, PROCEED 16 2/10 MILES WEST ON HIGHWAY 55/48 TOWARDS WAR DENVILLE. W. TURN LEFT AT BRILL ROAD, STATE ROUTE 603 HOC, RATON, FL 3348] 0 CONTACT: TIM DENNIS C AND PROCEED 200 YARDS AND MAKE A HARD RIGHT TURN. PROCEED 150 YARDS AND TURN LEFT TO ACCESS GATE. FOLLOW ACCESS PHONE (202)R 408_0960 PHONE: (703 778-8400) FAX: (202) 408-0961 ROAD APPROXIMATELY 900 FT i0 THE SITE. �` eEE saY SPECIAL CONDITIONS DISTRICT NAME: 6 p 111 E` APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS Wpp°ENSNIE 1. A STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FROM LICENSED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER- E PK CONFIRMING THE STRUCTURAL ADEQUACY OF THE TOWER AND FOUNDATION. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE VIRGINIA STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE WppvE` AND THE INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2006_ 2006 THE TOWER DESIGN SHALL COMPLY WITH CHAPTER 15, 16 AND 31 OF THE IBC 2006. THE TOWER AND FOPUNDATION CONSTRCUTION SHALL Y p1°4Ev -� SITE BE SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 17 OF THE IBC 2006. THE VIRGINIA STATEWIDE BUILDING CODE 2006 x °k INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2006 '6 TIA/EIA-222-FAND TIA/EIA-222-G NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2005 �Ro 3 v4 Centrex VIDDLE I.81 • MIDDLETOWN GLOBAL TOWER, LLC mumeatlen aervtea., loe. 1575 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 350 200 BRILL ROAD (E911 ADDRESS) 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD„ SUITE 300 1 a/0z/1D ZONING TITLE SHEET AND GENERAL NOTES WPHONE:(202 08-0960 5 STAR TANNERY, VA 22654 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 0 07/15/10 ZONING MA. M.M. M.M. R.K. M.M. M.M. FAX: (202)4080961 NO DATE REVISIONSBY CHK APP JDU NUMBCf< DRAWING. NUMBER REV - SCALE. AS SHOWN DESIGNED' C1l DRAWN. WA 1045010 _ RESP (al BEE S0. P1 PsiEst TaW PBEJP YIR SITE "P BUSNv /k VACINITY_ MAP 1E. 1'=laoo' SITE PLAN NOTES 1.) BOB NAMEI 1-81 MIDDLETOWN 2.) 'HSS RT A-1 ANO 5 NOT i0 BE U. R TRANSFER OF PROPERTY. 3.) THE SUBJECT PARCEL NFORlIATION OWNER ROBERT B AND REGINA A. MARTIN COU— FREDEP CNBCOUINMTYLEN VEAR ZD6V1121265b ASTAR ESS) MAILING ZONNO RA USE VACANT a) TRE EDREFERENCES FOR THE SUBJECT Pi RCEL AREA INSTRU1x001 ACRENT ES OOa INSTRUMENT p: 15768 5.) THE DATUM'S ARE NAD B3 AND NAVG eB AND THE BEARING BASE IS STATE G. NO UNDERGROUND UTANY ILITIES HAVE NH UTILITIES IGERLOCATED THE a,THE CCDNTRAACTOR EFORE CONSTRUCTION UST BE COIF RMED 7.) NO WETLANDS HAVE BEEN DEFINED ANDANT AREAS SHOWN AS MARSH, PONDS OR BITCHES All DONE SO FROM VISIBLE SURFACE FEATURES AND N 0 WAY CO nTUTE A DEFINED WETLAND. e.) THE FLOOD ZONE OF THE PROPOSED TOWER IS AS FOLLOWS: FLOOD ZONE X AREA DETERMINED i0 BE OUTDE THE FLOAD MAP FOR FREDOOD 11 OUN 30M. COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 510063 OSOOD iy VA REVISED. SEPTEMBER 2. 20- 9 ) 009.9.) THE DATA COLLECTED AND SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING ARE OR THE PURPOSES OF CONSTRUCTION OF A CELLULAR T WER FACILITY,Y NECESSARY ANC LLARY EQUIPMENT AND ALL APPROPRIATE EASEMENTS 10.) NO UNRECORDED EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY AND i POSSIBLE THAT $IIGH EASEMENTS IMPACT THE SITE. 11) THIS PROPERTT IS SUBJECT TO ALL MATTERS OF PUBLIC RE 12.) THE LOCATION OF THE PRDPOSED TOWER IS AS FOLLOY.S: iHf VALUE BELOW ARE .WITHIN 250 HORIZONTAL AND 2zo' _TICAL LA TITLE` L.E.-CE: "WEST 78' 28' 58.845" ELEVATION: 1242.33' AMSL GROUND AT CENTER OF TOWER 13.) THEE%I STING EXISTING 8 FT ACCESS DRIVEWAY ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE TO BE IMPROVE. TO 12 FT WIDTH. 14.) OLD BRILL ROAD IS AN EXISTING VOOT EIGHT OF WAY WHICH IS NOT MAINTAINED. entrex 1:ommunlostlon sambas, I- 1575 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 350 WASHINGTON, O.C. 20005 PHONE:(202)0408-0960 FAX: (202j408-0961 �ry oo °7e , , ptr c�tf�fi; Y oulE LACARIA 58]'4]32"E lat.t9' I P� PARCEE L D 69 A e �� y1`7 M SOLING. R\ DEED BOOR 98 PAGE 885 ��\ PROPOSE. 20 WDE 1„) ,Yfi USE RE5CIFFHAL - ACCESS AND BEILLY ` tVJll S`>q] EA HENT \ \ PROPOSED 12 WIDEGRA E / _ I ✓`. _i i T.. DRIVEWAYEct S (SEEN TE13) ., 1\ se] e•za•E \i \ .ye1 as. G:7.}, Exs ACCESS 1z , I / � GATE i \� E%1511 27 MATURE t I t; / �n TREES (� J/ \� Z ) : 11.. ///'l :./ � 1�2 �5.. •/"'��\ 625D j + / IDD FT / DENNISo " ,FENCED UNOLFX / PARCELN 'Do T69R'AA E7E ,r� S * . 1 DEED B U.ISE ,'AGE A E,8D9 ir\. sVJ i 3" rry0 X �I/yy// AIT o ROBERT B. ANO/ - PARCEL D., 11 A A 7 MARTIN ' O \ 9 / ZONINQ R 1 NSTRUMENENi p:06 0015]68 sS\f "A"A JACH qoN PARcoD IS 11 w TR.BERERT so NTIAL 6 : E LEGEND / � O BUND PROPERtt CORNER MARKS / Un TT POLE GUY ANCHOR sHuroFE CONCRETE SURFACE �RFAC u I _ GRAVEL SURFACE / I LINE TYPES oo / BOUNDARY LINE - PARENT PARCEL 2� ROBERT E. TEETS I - PARCEL 10. 69 5 1 f ZONING: RA UNSURVEYEO LINE - BOUNDARY OF ADJOINERS INSTRUMENT Y 20,35 / ® INSTRUMENT N0.O. A824824 RIGI-i OF WAY � USE ESIOENTIAL — — PE LONE FOR DIMENSIONS EASEMENT BOUNDARY 2' C CUR 10' CONTOUR REVISIONS SITE PLAN DRAWN: R.S. I I 1095.014 I Z-1 GRAPHIC SCALE 1 nen = RT sa IL SI EESITE PLAE C: I'= 60' Z-1 1.L • VIDDLE GLOBAL TOWER, LLC 200 BRILL ROAD ROAD ADDRESS) 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD., SUITE 300 STAR TANNERY, VA 22654 TANNERY, V BOCA RATON, FL 33487 LEGEND / � O BUND PROPERtt CORNER MARKS / Un TT POLE GUY ANCHOR sHuroFE CONCRETE SURFACE �RFAC u I _ GRAVEL SURFACE / I LINE TYPES oo / BOUNDARY LINE - PARENT PARCEL 2� ROBERT E. TEETS I - PARCEL 10. 69 5 1 f ZONING: RA UNSURVEYEO LINE - BOUNDARY OF ADJOINERS INSTRUMENT Y 20,35 / ® INSTRUMENT N0.O. A824824 RIGI-i OF WAY � USE ESIOENTIAL — — PE LONE FOR DIMENSIONS EASEMENT BOUNDARY 2' C CUR 10' CONTOUR REVISIONS SITE PLAN DRAWN: R.S. I I 1095.014 I Z-1 _� vARosEo e x DN eurx PaDPDSED R' ucxmwG R z. o' NNtt CXNN NNx FENCE s ° o• G'-o- 4 'm,x 1 x�cx spree vA jfl>)y- . ..i7.� j l oN sots, sEE ,z �4• x vremasED i°wER� ,� 6.=Iso D• II-�. ¢-0 ax x_ L-T __ YSFRNO[ERA AE 4E 43-1 NOH is F Co[ED AESS I �I QFUNAEO CA fi�'wr $i.,S. ARNE BASE EE 1/Z 1 ° x I (ONRE fuNREO CNPom .,� ANOUNA2 I ZO I yI m Yr iF 1 I LEASF PREP , f H-JL .LL L i I 111111 FiOvhR " FNN °- � {F iF 71 (0) 50'-O• � AE cpRRIFA ANIENNp3 OPOs[0 pN0 (3) LANAE II SiAN00fF FRpNFO. SEE I/Z-] I PROPOSED SHFNiEL 0-1I I x 199-D I I I I I I I fuNwE I IY. m' d LFASE AREA I I I I I I I i I I I I I EONRE I oke � � `; I z ` I LEASE AREA Z-Z. I t L____--_ {f sE1f-SHPPRi lONFA 9EREf O00EPP Rlfl I'� � TOWER ftBLOHENIEL CAME UODEF 'H •a •j •.i PRROSN SHFNhL L eINEi2 ON p 10':10' RWOSEO SHENIEL -SLAB, SEE 172-5 ICEBAIOCE x I I I I I - I I PROPOSED SHENIEL ' NAE .. CPS AxR.A. FG F—_— % _ 11•�YO' I SEE J/Z-] OPOSEO SXFNiEt !EASE ARFP 'n NSEAE R° EA I I a0, 00/em RF CABLFS I I I lE s ut I I I uD I j 'rl i 1 i fi NRE j x e " IEpsE �.,:i I �I oPOSm sNLxrzE I I I AREA J / GPE AkRNNP w-p. pROPDSfD 6 Hlot / J/Z , PAOPGSED SHENIEL R._0. PPC aiii s LEASE AREA /A NNn CEH NILNU LW.fE1MF 5 WE 11' BARK WAE, flOPOWODp FENCE, (3 9DE5)< (1EESOEZONIY) / n + 2T — �y. COMPOUND PLAN TOWER ELEVATION entrex YIDDLE GLOBAL TOWER, LLC m�nleatlu aarvlwa, Iia. 1.81 • MIDDLETOWN 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD., SUITE 300 1 oa 1575 Eye Street, N.W. Suite 350 200 BRILL ROAD ( E911 ADDRESS) /Oz/1D ZONINc COMPOUND PLAN AND TOWER ELEVATION BOCARATON, FL 33487 0 D7/15/10 ZONING MA. M.M. M.M. wP ...(- ON, D.C. z99o5 STAR TANNERY, VA 22654 R.Ic. M M. M.M. PHONE: (203'f40&09fi0. BY CHK APP �, "AY,iii ;�F}M / FAX: (20216090961 NO, CATC REVISIONS SCALE: AS SHOWN DESIGNED: C.T. DRAWN: R.K. ID4$,Qtq Z_Z nD. 'NCP ENE.1 I.EETUAL NIEI ANTENNA, nxrtN4n uwMD. PflOPoSED SYFNTEL -ISECTOR FRAME. TO. ANTENNA, iYP.,� AE 1/Z J FEENTUT NTENE S ..I ,iA (Tm OF J) Z -]TABIC 2 N IMP') 3) qW PRCY0.5EO 25U SAIF -SUPPORT BER CTENOTHS "ARB -011 FRAME ttP. PROPOSED 1/R' .BMPFF I—SEE SCHEOUCE PROPS B ZSO'SECF-NPPORi �`1 A 3 AI Y"Ri_ 10L. 11v 59 A 5b INAMH �q ly{fi'.ie.1. a t INO�.00ABIESL \ dT CABLF LADDER Nn1E< $I All ""HAS SHALT BE NRNISNEU wm OONNRLI BRACNEIS CONTRACTORSNUI CWROINAiE REGUIREO MECHANICALOOWNIII i FOR EACH AB TENNA WITH FITNCINHER. ANTENNA OOWNRLI SN LL BE BE AND tENFIED By A SMART LEVEL. 1 ANRNNA CETHDRUNE ON. IS IN REFERENCE DO fL,.— OO'. J. INSTAN✓N RFS li0' ANTENNA CONTROL CABLE fRgA SPRINT TELCO CABINET iG PCNA ANTENNA SE[lOR 1, FgOM COMA ANTENNA GECTOR I i0 (OMA ANTE A SECT EC R S FROM CDMA ANTENNA SECTOR 4 TO COMA XINI'A SU.- 3 C!RACITT SHALL INSTALL CWOR COME MR. W EACH NO OF CUAYJAL CABLES AND JUMPER CABLES xlm UMRESISIART CAPE. ALL CABLES �. SHALL BE MARRED AT ME TOP AND BOTiUM - 2' CWOR CAPE OR SiENCR TAG COACH TAPE MAY BE UNIAINEU PROM GRAIBAR ENTUB VTC. mE HRII PING IS mE CLOSEST TO ME EN0 OF ME CABLE WRAP 2• LUOREO FARE A MINIMUM OF J TIMES AROUND THE OREUMPLRENCE N HENTEL ANTENNA DETAIL SECTION ES 70 A„ NNLEPING mE CAPE IN mE SAME AREA As HULN AS POs BLE. is Nu Auow THE REMOVAL D TAPE mai wu FgDE DR Dlscaoq SCAIF: 3/e•=I'-O" WE iU WEFIND 5. FINAL SCUT: 3,1•-I'-0 ABLE LEU C STALL BE CUPTHMED AFTER MELD SWEEP TESL. PROPOSED SNENT[L GFS ANTENNA SUPPUEO AT LUCENI rI STRUCTURAL NOTES I-1 54.0 Al x 24•.IG: i. -ION REWIREMENIS PER mE MPGNIA STATE NIDE UNIFORM NUMTC COBE CO CABLE CONNECTORS AND igANSNIitEft EWIPMENI SHALL BE a5 HIN s OR caly. PIPE Roos. SPcaHCIAe R AxD IS xor wcwofD w mfsE caasmucnox oawxfxn r mE GwNE 2. MFORMA60N SNO%N Dx mESE DRAYANGS WAS OBiAINE4 BY FIEIG MEASURE- REWIRED T mE COxmHE C SHALL COINE ALL C0.uNECRO+ HagOWARE CARIE N PPF [UNxECiDR MENC. mE GENERAL COINC111OR BNAU. NM, ALL E%ISRNG C0.uDI60Ns pN0 STAINC£SS BIEEISECUgE THE CABLES. COxNEC60N HARDWARE S4ALL BE eURNO2 PUTS CAR MO6tt THE ARCHIIECi/ENCINEFR OF Al,TRE DISCREPgNC111 PRIOR io PROFRIIVc (ttP. 2 PICS) MATERIALS OR PROCEEOINC vnm CONSIRUC60N. SHALL BE RESPWSIRE, NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON PLANS D""S i0 LRHE NORM. DEN RACTOR GAIV (I/a.6)d I/4 r 161/1' LG. I FIOF O CAININGOALLAPERMItSNAND INSPLEPONs 1wAICH MAY BE REWIRED FOR SMALL VERIFY NORTH AND INFORM gHCNNECI/ENGINEER OF NJY DISCREPANCY BEFORE STAR➢NO CMSiRUCRIXV 4 STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL '.'HIM TO THE LATEST 10160.4 OF THE AISL 10 L %SET IN PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE MI%EO ANO PLACED IN ACCORDANCE PETYFICABENS FOR SWCNRAL EEL Ell 0,NG5 - ALLOWABLE STRESS E RCEE NEMENTS OF ACI Ula /NO AN -1. AND SH ON HAVE A 28 DAY O DESIGN STAN PEAS 6C nESIGN INCLUDING mE COMMENTARY ANO mE AISL M NCEOM COUPRR US OVE SHMENGD, OF 300D Osi ( O.N). CRETE SHALL BE 9 I TOP VIEW cpDE W N DARD Pgpc rc. u A N ISNRefp sal. uNlEss DmERw6E NTHU.. MIxMUM coxcRE¢ CON ft FOH RMNFC6ONG SIEEl SNUI BE 1 INtl1fS UNI£SB OmfflWiSf NOlEO. v/ "'IR' TEFL Pu A Sxa S SNALL CONFORM i0 ASTA A]fi. ETE SHALL BF 4 iU 6B AIR "'A" U-8011 FOL: 2.1 PIPE W NgleLf CNRU 5 xEx Huls AND was ER, cu . ALIU STRUCTURAL STEEL iPIPESN SNALL CONFORM i0 ASCA A5] GRACE B. ALL REINfORCNN STEEL SHALL CONFCRM TO A51M 615 CRADE I. DEFORMED ILL STRUTURAL Nat SNUCNRALE51EElLCOMPoNEN" AND�BPIC TED ASSENBUES SHALL BE II OIL Ei STEEL BARS. 'MER 'P' FABRIC SNALL C0.4FORM TO ASTM •185. N UIP GALMANI ED AFTER FASB HON STAAUpRD U -BOTS (—OEM) RFS AP%V18-40651611-C 6. WELDING SNAIL BE IN ACCORDANCE Wtm ME AMERICAN WEl01NG SOCIETY (54S' N r 6.B' W r p]• 0) 81 ".H, OD. STRUCTURAL KLNNG CODE -STEEL WELD E!£CTRCOES SHALE CABLE ALL OREnDEO STRUCTURAL FASTENERS FOR ANTENNA SU -1 ABSEMBLIES SHALL CONFORM TO ASiN p 7 OR ASTM A]6. ALL SmUCNRAL FASTENERS MICRDFIECT U'l ICEBRIOGE OUR SWUC,—L STEEL FRAMING STALL CONFORM i0 A5114 A325. FIFE SMPPUNi FRONT VIEW SIDEIA FASTENERS SNAIL BA U PA LOSE 5/e INCH MIN. DIAMETER BEARINGUNLESS CYPE CONN""S WIm 1HREA0S EXCWDED IN ME C EAR PIAxE. ACCHC_E HALTLL E%POSED FASTENERS. C.CRETEFE%PAN9" ANCHORVAL'S SH.TOALL BE WL6 NW" ELL' S.11 UNLESS OTHER- GPS MOUNTING DETAIL SHENTEL ANTENNA DETAIL Style I CAR'_r-D� - SLAY: I'=1•-0` ZL] VA5133 entrex 1.81-MIDDLETOWN GLOBAL TOWER, LLC e 575 Ey, t—f, N.W. Slit, Inc. 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD., SUITE 300 1 a ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS, TSTA Eye Street, N.W.. M0095B 200 BRILL ROAD (E811 ADDRESS) /Dz/m zowrlc MA. M.M. M.M. WASH INGTON, O.C.20005 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 oDi/ts/1 ZONING Rx. M.M. M. SCHEDULES AND NOTES.M PRONE: (2@ 408-0960 STAR TANNERY, VA 22854 FAX: N0 BY CHK APP JDe NUMeeR (202)�08�8961 . DATE RC!ISIONS CRA'IlIsB ;• ;4,iMoE'rt REV SCALE: AS SHOWN DESIGNED: M.M. DRAWN: A7.0. t095.D14 Z-3 0 SHENTEL ANTENNA AND COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE SECT00.1 GOA% LM1Gm (Fn ME/MEE W% R% SEACTOR2 LENGm (Fn TYPE/SZE W% RX SECTOR3 [pA ,„ IYPE(AZE Rk ANTENNA JUMPERLL IZ S.CI CR E i( . LLL IZ SOJ C2 i/R, fiC1 tZ SOJ Z CZ R. MRN. CABIf 5/B' Rb Rlb 1 5/B' 130 R]0' S0 ZJO R]IY EW PNENi .RMPFR Flc 2 SOJ 4, , 1/2' Rc ti SOJ I/Y d < FlC iZ SOJ i12. 1 1 CABLE UNN CODE YELLOW BROWN WILLIE C4 xlxoW wH IE \WII1E C4 REO BROMN 1fN t CS C6 FN BROWN %HIE mE wnnE wn TE ANTENNA RFS-APAN 20651611 C ARO flfS APNTB-206516HMiC pR0 OF5 APX18 2p6516H C A2 UMBER OF AHTENEAS 4 RAOIA60N CENTERi iA9'-0' 99 MWNi TEFL C l.1001 PATUAMCF Pq I -27 ITF PAgi liF SEEPRO ID- PHp q", — I PP -xi AZIWiH RL1 JO OEBREE. G OfCREE (idNi) DECREE 0 BEGREE ITIMBD 295 DEGREE 0 OU'll 1111- �`1 A 3 AI Y"Ri_ 10L. 11v 59 A 5b INAMH �q ly{fi'.ie.1. a t INO�.00ABIESL \ dT CABLF LADDER Nn1E< $I All ""HAS SHALT BE NRNISNEU wm OONNRLI BRACNEIS CONTRACTORSNUI CWROINAiE REGUIREO MECHANICALOOWNIII i FOR EACH AB TENNA WITH FITNCINHER. ANTENNA OOWNRLI SN LL BE BE AND tENFIED By A SMART LEVEL. 1 ANRNNA CETHDRUNE ON. IS IN REFERENCE DO fL,.— OO'. J. INSTAN✓N RFS li0' ANTENNA CONTROL CABLE fRgA SPRINT TELCO CABINET iG PCNA ANTENNA SE[lOR 1, FgOM COMA ANTENNA GECTOR I i0 (OMA ANTE A SECT EC R S FROM CDMA ANTENNA SECTOR 4 TO COMA XINI'A SU.- 3 C!RACITT SHALL INSTALL CWOR COME MR. W EACH NO OF CUAYJAL CABLES AND JUMPER CABLES xlm UMRESISIART CAPE. ALL CABLES �. SHALL BE MARRED AT ME TOP AND BOTiUM - 2' CWOR CAPE OR SiENCR TAG COACH TAPE MAY BE UNIAINEU PROM GRAIBAR ENTUB VTC. mE HRII PING IS mE CLOSEST TO ME EN0 OF ME CABLE WRAP 2• LUOREO FARE A MINIMUM OF J TIMES AROUND THE OREUMPLRENCE N HENTEL ANTENNA DETAIL SECTION ES 70 A„ NNLEPING mE CAPE IN mE SAME AREA As HULN AS POs BLE. is Nu Auow THE REMOVAL D TAPE mai wu FgDE DR Dlscaoq SCAIF: 3/e•=I'-O" WE iU WEFIND 5. FINAL SCUT: 3,1•-I'-0 ABLE LEU C STALL BE CUPTHMED AFTER MELD SWEEP TESL. PROPOSED SNENT[L GFS ANTENNA SUPPUEO AT LUCENI rI STRUCTURAL NOTES I-1 54.0 Al x 24•.IG: i. -ION REWIREMENIS PER mE MPGNIA STATE NIDE UNIFORM NUMTC COBE CO CABLE CONNECTORS AND igANSNIitEft EWIPMENI SHALL BE a5 HIN s OR caly. PIPE Roos. SPcaHCIAe R AxD IS xor wcwofD w mfsE caasmucnox oawxfxn r mE GwNE 2. MFORMA60N SNO%N Dx mESE DRAYANGS WAS OBiAINE4 BY FIEIG MEASURE- REWIRED T mE COxmHE C SHALL COINE ALL C0.uNECRO+ HagOWARE CARIE N PPF [UNxECiDR MENC. mE GENERAL COINC111OR BNAU. NM, ALL E%ISRNG C0.uDI60Ns pN0 STAINC£SS BIEEISECUgE THE CABLES. COxNEC60N HARDWARE S4ALL BE eURNO2 PUTS CAR MO6tt THE ARCHIIECi/ENCINEFR OF Al,TRE DISCREPgNC111 PRIOR io PROFRIIVc (ttP. 2 PICS) MATERIALS OR PROCEEOINC vnm CONSIRUC60N. SHALL BE RESPWSIRE, NORTH ARROW SHOWN ON PLANS D""S i0 LRHE NORM. DEN RACTOR GAIV (I/a.6)d I/4 r 161/1' LG. I FIOF O CAININGOALLAPERMItSNAND INSPLEPONs 1wAICH MAY BE REWIRED FOR SMALL VERIFY NORTH AND INFORM gHCNNECI/ENGINEER OF NJY DISCREPANCY BEFORE STAR➢NO CMSiRUCRIXV 4 STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL '.'HIM TO THE LATEST 10160.4 OF THE AISL 10 L %SET IN PLACE CONCRETE SHALL BE MI%EO ANO PLACED IN ACCORDANCE PETYFICABENS FOR SWCNRAL EEL Ell 0,NG5 - ALLOWABLE STRESS E RCEE NEMENTS OF ACI Ula /NO AN -1. AND SH ON HAVE A 28 DAY O DESIGN STAN PEAS 6C nESIGN INCLUDING mE COMMENTARY ANO mE AISL M NCEOM COUPRR US OVE SHMENGD, OF 300D Osi ( O.N). CRETE SHALL BE 9 I TOP VIEW cpDE W N DARD Pgpc rc. u A N ISNRefp sal. uNlEss DmERw6E NTHU.. MIxMUM coxcRE¢ CON ft FOH RMNFC6ONG SIEEl SNUI BE 1 INtl1fS UNI£SB OmfflWiSf NOlEO. v/ "'IR' TEFL Pu A Sxa S SNALL CONFORM i0 ASTA A]fi. ETE SHALL BF 4 iU 6B AIR "'A" U-8011 FOL: 2.1 PIPE W NgleLf CNRU 5 xEx Huls AND was ER, cu . ALIU STRUCTURAL STEEL iPIPESN SNALL CONFORM i0 ASCA A5] GRACE B. ALL REINfORCNN STEEL SHALL CONFCRM TO A51M 615 CRADE I. DEFORMED ILL STRUTURAL Nat SNUCNRALE51EElLCOMPoNEN" AND�BPIC TED ASSENBUES SHALL BE II OIL Ei STEEL BARS. 'MER 'P' FABRIC SNALL C0.4FORM TO ASTM •185. N UIP GALMANI ED AFTER FASB HON STAAUpRD U -BOTS (—OEM) RFS AP%V18-40651611-C 6. WELDING SNAIL BE IN ACCORDANCE Wtm ME AMERICAN WEl01NG SOCIETY (54S' N r 6.B' W r p]• 0) 81 ".H, OD. STRUCTURAL KLNNG CODE -STEEL WELD E!£CTRCOES SHALE CABLE ALL OREnDEO STRUCTURAL FASTENERS FOR ANTENNA SU -1 ABSEMBLIES SHALL CONFORM TO ASiN p 7 OR ASTM A]6. ALL SmUCNRAL FASTENERS MICRDFIECT U'l ICEBRIOGE OUR SWUC,—L STEEL FRAMING STALL CONFORM i0 A5114 A325. FIFE SMPPUNi FRONT VIEW SIDEIA FASTENERS SNAIL BA U PA LOSE 5/e INCH MIN. DIAMETER BEARINGUNLESS CYPE CONN""S WIm 1HREA0S EXCWDED IN ME C EAR PIAxE. ACCHC_E HALTLL E%POSED FASTENERS. C.CRETEFE%PAN9" ANCHORVAL'S SH.TOALL BE WL6 NW" ELL' S.11 UNLESS OTHER- GPS MOUNTING DETAIL SHENTEL ANTENNA DETAIL Style I CAR'_r-D� - SLAY: I'=1•-0` ZL] VA5133 entrex 1.81-MIDDLETOWN GLOBAL TOWER, LLC e 575 Ey, t—f, N.W. Slit, Inc. 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD., SUITE 300 1 a ANTENNA MOUNTING DETAILS, TSTA Eye Street, N.W.. M0095B 200 BRILL ROAD (E811 ADDRESS) /Dz/m zowrlc MA. M.M. M.M. WASH INGTON, O.C.20005 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 oDi/ts/1 ZONING Rx. M.M. M. SCHEDULES AND NOTES.M PRONE: (2@ 408-0960 STAR TANNERY, VA 22854 FAX: N0 BY CHK APP JDe NUMeeR (202)�08�8961 . DATE RC!ISIONS CRA'IlIsB ;• ;4,iMoE'rt REV SCALE: AS SHOWN DESIGNED: M.M. DRAWN: A7.0. t095.D14 Z-3 0 12" 3 5 8 D 7 13 12 11 15�"�� f'— 12•-0" 8'-0" MAX. - T WA' HPIP,LO l 1. 6' EP1H HN CAB iJ o. lb6 4 to — P N�6v wA� 8—/z NH Tegm_`p.. C4 5 6 or r0 rtEo Nux earls w/ w"AsCti'J 1��LyS"u ucsA wAv i'J;i: fitF;.t,: 1 u: ANC APE ;2�� 12` END 12.E �''' CHAIN LINK FENCE AND GATE DETAIL / \�X j O —OR rGNcuE REFERENCE NOTES OUAZIIE NOX 1 "P. (PATI Y PG56100529M OCORNER, ENO OR PULL POST: 3-0 CALV SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. O STRECHER BAR 4T 6 OLINE POST 2" SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. BILM LINE POSTS SHALL BE EQUALLY SPACED AT MAXIMUM 8'-0 O.C. O 3/e DIAGONAL ROD WITH G;:LVANIZED STEEL TURNBUCKLE OR DIAGONAL THREADED ROD. O 9 4l4l' O3 TOP RAIL k BRACE RAIL: 1 I/2" 0 GALV. SCHEDULE 40 PIPE. 8 FENCE CORNER POST BRACE: 1 1/20 GALV OFABRIC: 9 GA CORE WIRE SIZE 2' MESH, CONFORMING TO SCHEDULE 40 EACH CORNER EACH WAY ❑❑ M ASTM -A392 BLACK VWYL COATED. 17 GATE FRAME: 1 1/2" 0 GALV SHEDULE 40 PIPE. O RAILS7RA �9NIGLE{UWRAPGOFGFAB�IZRIC TIOE ANOE AT TENSIONµIRE 12 "MTS" MULTI -LOCKING DEVICEI}MT-C54I], (O.FCI.) - ivcA� oeToit(PART O BY HOG RINGS SPACED MAX, 24" INTERVALS. 13 GATE DIAGONAL GALVANIZED STEEL 1 7/2" 0 PIPE GAZE FRAME BRACE: t 1/2.0 e O HE O TENSION WARE: 9 GA. GALVANIZED STEEL AT AND 74 DIAMETER. � ��, 7 BARGED VIRE: DOUBLE STRAND 12-1/2° D.D. TWISTED WIRE 15 GATE POST: 4. 0 GAL. SCHEDULE 40 PIPE } X. f 21,W I MWSEHaFs� wnryc IN'.. TO MATCH WITH FABRIC 14 GA, 4 PT. BARBS SPACED ON APPROXIMATELY 5" CENTERS. FENCE SHALE BE BLACK FACTORY COATED. LEEP w(w 01a1 MLI MESA SPAN XL TELCO CABINET DETAILS HANDHOLE QUAZITE BOX SCALE t/2'= - 2-4 t J 6 I PIE, Elly NFLN. OP a IA. Pmt aALv. srEa PIPE CAP a' -o• wa. Pos so•Aaxc 6x6 2x4 SFCUAE TOIPIPE MV Mni PE SIRMS, 6' I/2'0 U-Ba1S `IsA M I/1"A GALV. TW Nfw IEEI U—ES ANO I I C.66 clra 1 616 Po91 m + m6E W000 sxwnxc CAIV. l'e PIPE A/ 66 Post $XITRNn 6" .TY SCP 40 PIPE (CALM e-6" CNG (Mj ATIACH PoX W ITUSTRUT tib PENCE ll:uo waslTias,wm. DNISH ORAOE 5'x5'x5/i6'x l'-0" • 'I i 1 �� // �j �j �/ �j ". h: DIN ER. CUE W /2 a u -fico —` - Bxisx ceaoE - - MAz. oar of c ATMAcx x vs'' Arts IN a z .. 4 it. I I1 :' \ /\ 1 1 I I I' CAP 6fINEEN IT I BORON OPRNCE ANO STONE Ai AASt L 0• LJ Ip•e I CWCRETE POUNOAILX 6'-1 MAX am ER P F h CONEREIE PO REAPON FRnui F NA I. ALL U-11 SHALL BE PRESSURE WEAIED. 1`--- UATLRSTYSERVICE FRAME , PPC RACK DETAIL SCAT r=1.n' S4 WOOD FENCE AND GATE ELEVATION VA5133 entrex 1.81 • MIDDLETOWN GLOBAL TOWER, LLC cOm" an1" Ion send—,L"` 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD., SUITE 300 1 B SITE DETAILS 15]5 By, Street, N.W. Suite 350 200 BRILL ROAD (E811 ADDRESS) /02/10 ZONING M A. M.M. M.M. WASHINGTON, O.G. 20005 BOCA RATON, FL 33487 0 07/15/10 ZONING R.K. M.M. M.M. PHONE: (202 D.0.1569 STAR TANNERY, VA 22654 REVISIONS BY CHK APP JOB NUMBER OHAWING NUMBER FAX: (202)405�09fi1 N0. DATE SCALE: AS SHOWN DESIGNED: MM. DRAWN: M.A. 1095014 7 4 0 0�4, 9A-' CAR0 :V � ,`,� PROPOREO 6xENiEt GRNER �t `H 4 p �O 1 !Ie,e 0 `V to' -D° (ca"ceETc Pn01 \`\\�� 3' � �sE�nrS Cy,•� )Ij ;f Q a� ��;aAll Ep�� I— PFWOSfO 10' x 15 CONCRETE PAD Q a p o(qED—EL MODCELL EQUIPMENT LAYOUT z o � E¢a'-1D• p sGtF:.i-s eAirzer GFaET - o � pa � 9 NFE Q p p 1AexE1 /I OP \\J 0 p _ p PPLGDINEI,E �. O S, 1-a o EQUIPMENT LAYOUT Ps LEFT SIDE FRONT RICHT SIDE PPC CABINET DETAILS sGLe r=r-D� _ C�? entrex V I-81 - MIDDLE DDLETOWN GLOBAL TOWER, LLC tsTs ere sieae�N.w. s�aeiso 200 BRILL ROAD (Egli ADDRESS) 750 PARK OF COMMERCE BLVD„ SUITE 300 1 oa oz/lo ZONING M.A. M M M M EQUIPMENT CABINETS LAYOUT DETAIL WPNO E: (202)408- 096905 STAR TANNERY, VA 22654 SOCA BATON, FL 33487 o D7/15/1O ZONING R.K. M,M. H.M. FAX: (202)408-095 NO DATE REVISIONS- BY CHI( APP X08 NUMBER DkAWING Ni1LIN'Ek—REV SCALE: SHOWN DESIGNED: M.A. DRAWN: M.A. ID95.014 Z_5 _ 0 ICOUNTY of FREDERICK �,�, •:�;�.�� .tea.,-�__9-�_��- .-�s��. Department of Planning and Developinent 540/665-5651 FAX: 540/665-6395 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP Deputy Director RE: NELUP Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan; 2010 Update — Public Hearing DATE: August 18, 2010 The 2010 Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan Update (NELUP) is presented to the Planning Commission as a public hearing item. A recommendation from the Planning Commission to the Board of Supervisors to endorse the 2010 Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan Update, following the public hearing, would be appropriate at this time. The Comprehensive Policy Plans Executive Committee, at their August 9, 2010 meeting, endorsed the 2010 Update for the second time. Following the Board of Supervisors work session held on July 7, 2010, a significant amount of improvement has been made to the NELUP mapping as a result of the very constructive input received from the work session participants. In support of the mapping effort, Staff has also prepared a presentation and narrative that describes the modifications to the NELUP 2010 Update from the previous version. This is available and will be presented at the Planning Commission meeting. The Community Area Plans Subcommittee of the CPPC has been working to update this plan over the past couple of years. The Plan was originally adopted in 1996 and, subsequently, amended on several occasions, most recently in 2003. In recent years, a significant amount of development activity has occurred in this corridor resulting in the need to revisit the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan. Changes in this part of the County have also presented new opportunities to refine the land use plan. The 2010 NELUP Update continues to promote the Economic Development opportunities within this area of Frederick County. A particular effort of this study has been to re-evaluate the transportation element and ensure that it is supportive of the land use. It proposes an enhanced transportation network that is functionally acceptable. For the first time, Frederick County was able to utilize transportation modeling into a small area land use plan. This modeling verified that with minor modifications, the transportation network was balanced with the land use plan. 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 Planning Commission Public Hearing RE: NELUP Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan; 2010 Update August 18, 2010 Page 2 The 2010 NELUP effort incorporates a land use map and two transportation maps; one which identifies the network and one which designates the typical sections of the road network, as well as a community facilities map which also recognizes and incorporates the environmental elements of this portion of the County into the Plan. This mapping effort is supported by an updated text for the Northeast Frederick Land Use Plan. An overview of the key elements contained in the 2010 NELUP update has been provided. A public informational meeting was held on Tuesday April 20, 2010. This public meeting was held at Stonewall Elementary School and was well attended with 111 members of the community participating. The update to the Plan was generally well supported with input guiding the final draft of the land use plan. No changes were made to the Plan following the public informational meeting. Previously, the Planning Commission, at their May 19, 2010 meeting, was supportive of the Plan and recommended approval of the 2010 Update. As also noted, The Comprehensive Policy Plans Executive Committee, at their August 9, 2010 meeting, endorsed the 2010 Update for the second time. Please contact me if you have any additional questions. MTR/bad Attachments fr °x�x,lxx�°a ry 12 WA M C-) Fn qwm �3 s a NELUP -Revision Future Land Use Plan Public Hearing Working DRAFT July 30, 2010 °ocrvoppU, • x .r f • 6.." V • CJ e i s h' #�a 0 i••.r q 'a rV VV im Vvw W V`�'... wm ,r1r`J�N'Uerv1(41l�rVbVti � _. r1IWI1rrViibV�td11AM' Y•t \♦ a \Za's�Y ?\,hl � . er.,,WmolgxxgrE n ° �C � �n'R'e�noR rY'imsy"•®•" a xgnpyu ,� wpPo9m a' �� vfm°x �` ` i „ i ,•ti f ' _� `l - p j`°gFep `. .f `g .SWC `E<x 1 �: • - °� �.� '4tk.<.n +-.. o �`wq w raEu+ xos� 5 � o l . e e I � s r» °ocrvoppU, • x .r f • 6.." V • CJ e i s h' #�a 0 i••.r q 'a North Eastern Land Use Plan (New) ORural Community Center J> Business q Industrial QD Mixed Use Industrial Office r. Warehouse 41 Heavy Industrial 4 Extractive Mining Planned Unit Development OResidential -�+ Developmentally Sensitive Areas Fire & Rescue School Park 0 Existing Elementary Existing High School © Future Elementary \.l Future Park UDA Sewer & Water Service Area Not Included in Study Area Transportation Plan Shared Access Reverse Frontage i Critical Access Management Area *—N -i Proposed NELUP Roads 0 0.25 05 1 Miles xf W oovnmrt (f'�cals arogcrSAto_rtgs:.^t�tua IaIE_°eaa�ym ewerNev_gEvsld.WFy� xenp� r�n�.we Uxmus[ waomfx NO_qu� at�rw ftatTmal a er.,,WmolgxxgrE n ° �C � �n'R'e�noR rY'imsy"•®•" a xgnpyu ,� wpPo9m a' �� vfm°x �` ` `g ,, e �: • - °� �.� '4tk.<.n +-.. o �`wq w raEu+ xos� R " � � o a . e e • s � s r» vtem 'P¢`f (129 �a� E °g �'�X03• x q� � r otoxrT'°� d' yOpuT North Eastern Land Use Plan (New) ORural Community Center J> Business q Industrial QD Mixed Use Industrial Office r. Warehouse 41 Heavy Industrial 4 Extractive Mining Planned Unit Development OResidential -�+ Developmentally Sensitive Areas Fire & Rescue School Park 0 Existing Elementary Existing High School © Future Elementary \.l Future Park UDA Sewer & Water Service Area Not Included in Study Area Transportation Plan Shared Access Reverse Frontage i Critical Access Management Area *—N -i Proposed NELUP Roads 0 0.25 05 1 Miles xf W oovnmrt (f'�cals arogcrSAto_rtgs:.^t�tua IaIE_°eaa�ym ewerNev_gEvsld.WFy� xenp� r�n�.we Uxmus[ waomfx NO_qu� at�rw ftatTmal N ELU P - Revision J111 Future Transportation Plan Public Hearing V Working DRAFT July 30, 2010 f� Lane Divides P r. r,7/ �„ 'l�` I�• /��_ h� ) ..ti Oxo `1� c _ - j _) "�� ,\ r c fT' S ,^ _ _ � _ � ~�'. ,rf �w4 •vim"'„ � I, , r -_.. •,4 6 f• '.r •� t.. it _ e - I r e P _ l � N(�. fid -•� F �l rf�4?`w�—.1:�;' • A`• � f _ f r lj I y y .f Transportation Plan q+ Proposed Lane Divides 4 Lane Limited Access w/ CD Lanes (if required) ' 6 Lane Divided 4 Lane Divided Proposed NELUP Roads �f. , x •,,� Railroads 1 Land Use x�i sD % Urban Development Area s SWSA Rural Community Center Not Included in Study Area R• f 0 0.25 0.5 1 Miles `o NELUP - Revision Community Facilities '? Natural and Recreational Resources Plan GAO\yOw ewe " Working DRAFT Public Hearing _ July 30, 2010 Y � 4 , 11 I' ..-t-.. is ",► _ ` ., /✓ �r' A•n� A.r �. J s.-.�5. .., 1 ��' ryooUDkht.HD � }` \E ' q! a I A n' J.... C'EDgR Ii/LL RU -+; :..��A. \~�.. •;J �-`r ELI 141 .._ten � • °n"' - F 4 t b! u I ,t \y ` j i• 9y , -- _... � it -- --_ ___ { � � �' r y, / a''.:;K• - - r, a t - t vp 0 i r , v 4 �y _, • „ f __ _ Community Facilities ©Elementary Existing Elementary d _ . . ,. `",' °, s J --• � c7 Future Elementary School a, r Future Elementary ,.:: _`~''" • '�y�Iq i *� -, `.,A rrfj Middle School t om,.,.'.` _,_ .'.:. "'�. AK�e •( '... ,=.} ✓.':r,6 High School Existing High School o° Fire & Rescue Station J o a o w Park Future Park ti• " ! Future Park �'• "1�`.� � ,. _,� v � - < �,. �=' � _z. Historical Landmark Survey Points ~°�- ,� '�'� '!•y�'" ©'� r" Water Resources Area Natural Resource & Recreation Areas 4 Developmentally Sensative Areas `#' ' Rural Community Center lSLand Use r -1 1 •` Urban Development Area g Sewer & water Service Area ✓ ` __ �'�� l t'I�..�. F� _` I..I C�?+,r� ,., �ALLtY,nIILL RD �� ,!•- • „ , _ -A•p ,.Transportation Plan ✓f+f.,\.� �„-,.' �.. f �j. I-...' �..��„' 'y"' , Shared Access Reverse Frontage rrr r1 " ; (, }r f f !- —t” t �-�-•-{ F° �� Critical Access Management Area 0'%0 Proposed NELUP Roads Railroads Not Included In Study Area I • �, - 0 025 05 1 Miles - ;! ` SEhSEh}RU