HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-18 CommentsFrom: Matthew Smith <Matthew.Smith(@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2018 11:28 AM
To: John Bishop <'I, ishopfcva_us>
Cc: Rhonda Funkhouser <rhonda.funkhouser@vdot.virginia.gov>
Subject: RE: Rezoning Application, Stonewall IV
No, VDOT finds the applicant's response related to allowable uses of ITE Land Use Code 150 and 154
acceptable.
Matthew B. Smith, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Land Development
Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties
14031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg, VA 22824
Phone # (540) 984-5615
Fax # (540) 984-5607
From: John Bishop [mailto:jbishop@fcva.us]
Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2018 10:55 AM
To: 'Matthew Smith' <Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov>
Cc: Rhonda Funkhouser <rhonda.funkhouser@vdot.virBinia.Bov>
Subject: RE: Rezoning Application, Stonewall IV
From: Matthew Smith <Matthew.Smith@vdot.vir�inia.go\i>
Cc: Rhonda Funkhouser <rhonda.funl<hcuser(@vdot.vir�inia.gov>
Subject: RE: Rezoning Application, Stonewall IV
Below please find VDOT's review comments for the Stonewall IV Rezoning Application (attached) dated
April 12, 2018.
The Frederick County Transportation Chapter and Northeast Frederick Area Pian of the
Comprehensive Plan identifies the extension of Lenoir Drive as an on-ramp to Route 37 west as a
future transportation improvement. While the Generalized Development Plan has been revised to
locate the future development entrance in a manner that is not in conflict with the comprehensive
plan improvement, VDOT strongly recommends Frederick County request right -of -;Wray dedication
on the subject property to accommodate the future improvement and the rezoning documents
updated accordingly.
Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us.
Matthew B. Smith, P.E.
Area Land Use Engineer
VDOT - Land Development
Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties
14031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg, VA 22824
Phone # (540) 984-5615
Fax # (540) 984-5607
�s.a.�� Virga,t •; .; .t
Xv ii./. y of Tr
Staunton
Stonewall IV Rezoning TIA, Frederick County, VA
Summary of VDOT Review Comments
March 9, 2018
VDOT Staunton District Planning performed a review of the Stonewall IV Rezoning TIA completed by
Kittelson & Associates, Inc. submitted on February 14, 2018. Overall, the methodology used for the
analysis was found to be acceptable and no revisions are required. The comments below are offered as
reference notes for minor issues we found. Please let us know if we can help answer any questions
related to these comments.
1. Typos were found on some of the lane group level of service figures, where the LOS shown does
not match the correctly reported LOS shown on the corresponding traffic conditions tables.
2. For future reference, please ensure coordinated phases match the provided signal plans. For
this corridor, all signals should be programmed with phases 2 and 6 as the coordinated phases.
Only the Rt. 11/Redbud Rd signal is currently programmed with only phase 2 as the coordinated
phase. This does not appear to have a substantial impact for this TIA, so no revisions are
required.
3. The Rt. 11/Redbud Rd eastbound left turn was modeled with a 3 second lost time adjustment in
both the AM and PM peak hours. VDOT requires that this setting be 0 for all movements. Since
this setting degrades signal performance rather than improving it, no revisions are required.
4. The Rt. 11/Redbud Rd eastbound and westbound left turns are modeled with permissive -
protected operation, but actually operate using flashing yellow arrows. The turn type for these
movements should be programmed using the "Dallas permissive + protected" setting with the
"Permitted Flashing Yellow" box checked. This does not appear to have a substantial impact for
this TIA, so no revisions are required.
Outside of the TIA review, Staunton District Planning offers the additional following comments for the
rezoning applicant's and county staff's consideration.
5. The TIA scoping form identifies ITE Land Use Code 152, High -Cube Warehouse / Distribution
Center as the trip generation for the proposed rezoning development, which was utilized in the
technical analysis of the study. However, Proffer 1.1, dated February 13, 2018 indicates the
development of the property will be limited to 820,000 square feet, used solely for warehousing
and distribution. The High -Cube Warehouse / Distribution Land Use is much less intense in
character than traditional warehouse / distribution uses, which have the potential to double the
trip generation utilized in the traffic analysis of the study. VDOT District Planning recommends
Staunton
consideration of adjusting the proffer to identify the allowable use to be more in-line with the
definition of Land Use Code 152 in the most current ITE Trip Generation Manual or limit the
permitted daily trip generation of the site to 1,378 as specified in the TIA.
The 2035 Frederick County Comprehensive Plan Northeast Frederick Area Plan identifies a
future transportation improvement of a ramp connection to Route 37 south from Lenoir Drive.
The current layout of the site as illustrated on the GDP proposes the development entrance at
the current termini of Lenoir Drive, which would be in conflict with the future improvement.
VDOT District Planning would recommend adjustments to the layout of the site to be in
conformance with the Frederick County Comprehensive Plan.
FREDERICK
WATER
315 Tasker Road PH (540) 868-1061 Eric R. Lawrence
Stephens City, Virginia 22655 Fax (540) 868-1429 Executive Director
www.FrederldiWater.com
February 22, 2018
Marian B. Harders
Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh PC
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Woodbridge, Virginia 22192
RE: Rezoning Application Comment
Stonewall IV Rezoning Application
Tax Map Number: 43-A-21, 43 -A -21B, 43-19-4 and 43-A-24
88.91 acres
Dear Ms. Harders:
Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments on the Stonewall IV rezoning
application package, with a draft proffer statement and Impact Analysis Statement dated
February 13, 2018. Frederick Water offers comments limited to the anticipated impact/effect
upon Frederick Water's public water and sanitary sewer system and the demands thereon.
The project parcels are located within the sewer and water service area (SWSA) and in an area
presently served by Frederick Water. SWSA enables access to public water and sewer service by
county policy. Location within the SWSA does not guarantee that sanitary sewer and water
capacities are available to serve the property.
The rezoning application proffer states that the proposed use will be limited to a warehouse
and distribution facility on no larger than 820,000 gross square feet. The impact analysis
statement is silent of the proposed water and sewer demands.
Facilities for conveyance of water to, and sanitary sewer from, the subject properties do
presently exist. Until the proposed uses' projected water and sewer demands are known, it is
nnrNtv>asastx
Water At Your Service
Page 2
Stonewall IV rezoning application
Marian Harders
February 22, 2018
unknown if the existing conveyance network has the capacity to accommodate the projected
demands.
The proffer statement is silent on improvements that would be constructed by the applicant to
meet water and sanitary sewer demands. Accordingly, the comments offered herein are
general in nature. The ultimate decision regarding the ability to serve the property with
adequate water and sanitary sewer will be determined at the time the site's use is determined,
conveyance facilities are constructed, and water and sewer connection fees are paid to
Frederick Water. Sanitary sewer system capacity is not reserved until the sewer connection fee
is paid to Frederick Water, and physical connection to the system is made.
Water and sanitary sewers are to be constructed in accordance with the FCSA standards
specifications. Dedicated easements may be required and based on the layout vehicular access
will need to be incorporated into the final design.
Please be aware that the FCSA is offering these review comments without benefit of knowledge
of the projected water and sewer demands of the site.
Thank you for the opportunity to offer review comments.
Sincerer##
t
■�
Eric R. Lawrence
Executive Director
Cc: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, County Planning Department
Dick Helm, Frederick -Winchester Service Authority
Herders, Marian
From: Funkhouser, Rhonda (VDOT) <Rhonda.Funkhouser@VDOT.Virginia.gov> on behalf of
Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT) <Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov>
Sent: Monday, March 12, 2018 11:37 AM
To: Harders, Marian;jcaIlow@kittelson.com
Cc: 'John Bishop'; tklein@fcva.us; Mark Cheran; Smith, Matthew, P.E. (VDOT)
Subject: Stonewall IV - VDOT Comments to Rezoning/TIA/Proffers
Attachments: Stonewall IV TIA 2018-02 Submittal - VDOT Comments.pdf, Scanned from
EDNXerox.pdf
Please find attached VDOT comments for the Stonewall IV Rezoning TIA/proffer submittal.
Should you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact us.
Matthew -B. Smith, P.E. I Area Land Use Engineer
Virginia Department of Transportation
Clarke, Frederick, Shenandoah & Warren Counties
14031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg, VA 22824
voice: 540/984-5615
fax: 540/984-5607
e-mail: Matthew.Smith@vdot.virginia.gov
Rezoning Comments
Virginia Department of Transportation
U-1
tn;
Virginia Department of Transportation
Attn: Resident Engineer
14031 Old Valley Pike
Edinburg, Virginia 22824
(540)984-5600
Land de ive to:
Virginia Department of Transportation
Attn: Resident Engineer
2275 Northwestern Pike
Winchester, Virginia 22603
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Virginia
Department of Transportation with their review. Attach three copies of your application form,,
location wap, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent Information.
Applicant's Name: Equus Capital Partners, Ltd. i eiephone . Z(;
Mailing Address. Attn: Marian Harders c/o Walsh Colucci Lubeler & Walsh
4310 Prince William Parkwat Suite 300
Location of property 88.91 acres located at the southern terminus of
i.enoir °give _S r.`I; I' Ih) imrnew6ate3" adjacent to the
Stonewall industrial Park.
Current zoning —RA Zoning requested: M-1 Acreage: 88.91 acres
Virg;irfrr Defis:rmmttofTmnspertr lan Corvmentr
Sec attached email from VDOT to Walsh, Colucci, Luheley & Walsh date
d March 12, 2g16.
VDD T Si,gnatury & Date�e�
1!'od-t to VDOT Please Rcturn F&i to Appli t
20
COUNTY of FREDERICK,
Fkader crr P. 111�,T i=wr s
County Attorney
540/722-8383
Fax 540/667-0370
E-mail:
MAR 2018 l�yili @co.frederick.va.us
March 20, 2018
VIA E-MAIL AND REGULAR MAIL
Ms. Marian Harders
Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh PC
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Woodbridge, VA 22192-5199
Re: Rezoning Application — Stonewall IV rAuus Capital Partners, Ltd. ("Fquus") —
Tax Parcel Numbers 43 -A -21.43-A-2113, 43-A-24, and 43-19-4 (the "Subject
Property") -- Proffer Statement dated February 13, 2018 (the "Proffer Statement")
Dear Ms. Harders:
You have submitted to Frederick County for review the Proffer Statement, for the
proposed rezoning of the Subject Property, 88.91± acres in the Stonewall Magisterial District,
from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the M t (Light Industrial) District, with proffers. I have
now reviewed the Proffer Statement and it is my opinion that the Proffer Statement would be in a
form to meet the requirements of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance and the Code of
Virginia, and would be legally sufficient as a proffer statement, subject to the following
comments:
Title to one Of the parcels (43-A-21$) is in the name of Cheryl G. Morris and John S.
Morris, Jr., husband and wife, as tenants by the entireties, with common law right of
survivorship. I understand from the signature line on proffer statement that Mr. Morris is
deceased. We will need submission of sufficient evidence of that fact, such as the type of
statement typically included, under oath, in a deed conveying property so titled, reciting
the fact of the death of one of the tenants by the entireties.
In the heading section, of the Proffer Statement, Equus is identified as Equus Capital
Partners, Ltd. and in the signature block, it is identified as Equus Capital Partners, LP. 1
realize that Virginia corporate law may have certain naming requirements that conflict
with those of the state law of entity formation, resulting in the use of a different suffix it,
Virginia, but the use of the suffix should nonetheless be consistent throughout the Proffer
Statement.
107 North Kent Street , Winchester, Virginia 22601
Ms. Marian Harders
March 20, 2018
Page 2
• In the first paragraph of the introduction, the action is twice referred to as a "proffer
amendment". These references should instead be to a "rezoning".
• In the second paragraph of the introduction, the definition of the term "Applicant" should
be expanded to include the current owner of the Subject Property as well.
• The third paragraph of the introduction does not seem to fit where it has been placed.
The provisions of the Proffer Statement are not limited merely to instances in which
specific plans or exhibits reference them.
• Proffer 2 — The area indicated to be dedicated for Route 37 right of way does not
necessarily appear to encompass a sufficient portion of the right of way area as shown by
the Comprehensive Plan depiction on the County's GTS. Staff will want to confirm the
extent of the proposed dedication area.
• Proffers 3. 4, and 6 Most of the provisions of these proffers simply restate ordinance
requirements and, to that extent, are not appropriate for inclusion in the Proffer
Statement.
• Proffer 5 The proffer should indicate payment simply to Frederick County and not the
Frederick County Board of Supervisors.
• Signature blocks — Because, among other things, we require that proffer statements, once
a rezoning is approved, be recorded in the land records, any and all signatures will need
to have notarizations.
I have not reviewed the substance of the proffers as to whether the proffers are suitable
and appropriate for this specific development, as my understanding is that review will be done by
staff and the Planning Commission.
Sincerely,-)
Rurlerik B. Williams
County Attorney
cc: Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director, Department of Planning & Development (via e-
mail)
John Bishop, Assistant Director, Transportation, Department of Planning & Development
(via e-mail)
Rezoning Comments
LO
(' FEB 2 0 2018
d.»+ '
Frederick County Department of Parks & Recreation
Mail to:
Frederick County
Department of Parks & Recreation
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(540) 665-5678
Hand deliver to:
Frederick County
Department of Parks & Recreation
County Administration Bldg., 2nd Floor
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Department of
Parks & Recreation with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer
statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information.
Equus Capital Partners, Ltd. 703.680.4664
Applicant's Name: Telephone: _
Mailing Address: Attn: Marian Harders c/o Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh
4310 Prince Wiliam Parkway, Suite 300
Woodb !i e, VA 22192
Location of property: 88.91 acres located at the southern terminus ofN
1,; noir_Drive RT F 32) immediatelX adiacent to the
�nnewalLTndu,ctrial Park. �_
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M-1 �. _ Acreage: 88.91 acres
Department of Parks & Recreation Comments:
.
t
1r� a � r�.Ja�1 f➢t.. /G'�,. L��� lIV Ci k T�_ � �,.� .�;.�Sr-�"
! 1
Y-. U; 11 l y it
Pks. & Rec. Signature & Date: U41'b. 6AI- IA --&S
Notice to Department of Pa3rks)& Recreation - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
23
Rezoning Comments
FEB 2'9 2018
L
Frederick -Winchester Service Authority
Mail to:
Fred -Wine Service Authority
Attn: 3esce-W,': oMtt, Executive Director
P.O. Box 43
Winchester, Virginia 22604
(540)722-3579
Hand deliver to.
Fred-Winc Service Authority
Attn: Jnsc—W -Mv%tt
107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Fred-Winc ;
Service Authority with their review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer
statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information.
Applicant's Name: Equus Capital Partners, Ltd.
Telephone-, 703.680.4664
Mailing Address: Attn: Marian Harders c/o Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh
431-D Ijririce- Williamar way, ui e --
W'oucie, t� AA 22192
Location of property: 88.91 acres located at the southern terminus of
Lenoir Drive (RT F-732) imine late y a jacent to the
Stonewall Industrial Park
Current zoning:RA Zoning Zoning requested: _ Acreage; 88.91 acres
Fred -Wine Service Authority's Comments:
go
Fred-Wthority's
Signature & Date:n ` 1 e ��, 2
Notice to Fred-Winc Service Authority - Please Return Form to Applicant
33
Rezoning Comments
Frederick County Fire Marshal
Mail
Frederick County Fire Marshal
1800 Coverstone Drive
Winchester, Virginia 22602
(540)665-6350
Hand 'elduar. to—
Frederick County Fire & Rescue Dept
Attn: Fire Marshal
Public Safety Building
1800 Coverstone Drive
Winchester, Virginia
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the Frederick County
Fire Marshal with his review. Attach a copy of your application form, location map, proffer
statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information.
Applicant's Name : I-4uus Capital Pai'mers`I.ttl. Telephone:
703.680,4664
Mailing Address: AUia arias Yd'aj(„�jttc}�t,i,al._i Walsh
4318-2eitice. William Parkway,'–suiLL,X[i
Location of property : 88.91 acres louqvd.tt they soutliern terminus of
Lenoir Drive (RT F-241)i[nmedialdy_adktcent to,the
Stonewall 74justrial Park
Current zoning: _ RA...__— Zoning requested M-1 Acreage :88.91 acres
Fire Marshal's Comments:
Fire Marshal's Signature & Date: — ` ;2
Notice to Fire Marshal - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
22
Frederick County
Department of Fire and Rescue
Office of the Fire Marshal
1080 Coverstone Drive Winchester, VA 22602
(540) 665-6350 Fax. (540) 678-4739 Email: fmoOfcva. us
Flan Review Comments
Date Received Date Reviewed
2/1512018 2/16/2018
Plan/Permit Type Rezoning Application 02-15-18
Name Equus Capital Partners/Stonewall IV
Address Lenoir DR Winchester VA 22603
Project Name Rezoning 02-15.18
Applicant Name & Number Equus Capital Partners 703-680-4664
RE#
Permit Number
Emergency Vehicle Access: Adequate InadequateI A/��
Hydrant Location: Adequate Inadequate N1A
Siamese Location: Adequate Inadequate N/
Fire Lanes Required: Yes No N�
Plan Approval Status Approve
Comments
Signature: /
Reviewed By: Kenneth Scott, Jr.
Ftr�nniwd Comments
Frederick County DeptrtMent of Public Works.
Frederick County Dept. ot'Puhlic Works
Attiv Director of Lngineering
M? 'North Rent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601
(540) 665-5043
Az 114eFicer ia:
Frederick County Dept. of Public. Works
Awn- Director of Engineering
County Administration Bldg., Suite 202
107 North Kent Strect
Winchester, Virginia
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as pushibic in order to assist the Department of
Pkablic Works with their review. Attach a copy of your ispplirafiun f'ornt. Bocation ntap@ proffer
statemtet, impact analysis, and any other pertinent infortnxtion.
Applicant's Name:
i?quus Capital Partners, Ltd.
`I elephone. _R 7 03.680.4664
Mailing Address: Attri: Marian 1-1arders c/o Walsh Colucci Lubeley tar Walsh
4310 1'nnte
i1'cioclbricil;e, %,!A 2219 2
Location of property:88.91 acres located at the southern_ terminus of _
Lenoir Drive (RTF -732) immediatelvad'acent to thr
RA
Current zoning: �.a _ zoning rcquestec , _ -1_.._ _. Acreage: 88.91 acres
Department of Public Work's Comments.
,.a .: r _ .._ ... ��. _
Public Works Signature & Cate:
3- IZ-
Notice to Dtpt, of Public Works - Please Return This Form to the Applicant
21
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
March 28, 2018
Ms. Marian Harders
Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh, PC
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Woodbridge, Virginia 22192
RE: Proposed Rezoning for Stonewall IV
Property Identification± umbers tPI s): 43-A-21, 43-A-2113,
Dear Ms. Harders: 43-19-4 and 43-A-24
Thank you for the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Stonewall
IV rezoning. This application seeks to rezone four properties totaling 88.91 from the RA
(Rural Areas) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. This review is
based upon the proffer statement submitted on February 13, 2018.
Traffic Study — Land Ilse The traffic study uses 820,000 sq. ft. of high cube
warehouse. This results in daily trips of 1,378. This trip generation is significantly
lower than the standard warehouse worst case scenario of uses that could potentially
populate this property under the Ml Zoning District and your proffer statement as
currently written. Specifically, the trip generation is significantly lower than the
standard warehouse distribution trip generation. Vdhile proffer 1.1 does limit the
property use to warehouse and distribution, it does not make the distinction of high
cube. This is a significant discrepancy impacting the veracity of the Traffic Impact
Analysis. This is most easily addressed with a clarification within the proffer
statement.
2. Comprehensive Plan- Eastern Road Plan The Eastern Road Plan portion of the
County Comprehensive plan calls for ramp access from Lenoir Drive to Route 37.
The site layout and proffers, as currently submitted, does not allow for this future
connection to take place. This is an important connection that, when constructed,
offers significant positive traffic impacts to the surrounding area and this site.
Participating in this improvement is particularly important due to the proposed
development traffic that is being added to an already overburdened network and
particularly intersections such as Route 11 and Welltown Road which the TIA
clearly demonstrates are/will be functioning below level of service C.
Page 2
Ms. Marian Harders
RE: Stonewall IV
March 28, 2018
3. Route 3 . Regarding the proffer for the Route 37 right-of-way, I would suggest
adding language in addition to being consistent with the GDP that it is consistent
with the Eastern Road Plan update adopted by the Board of Supervisors on
December 13, 2017. This way, if there is any unintentional disconnect between the
GDP and what was adopted by the Board, the intent is clear.
Once again, thank you for the opportunity to review this application. Please feel free to
contact me with questions or concerns.
Sincerely
John A. Bishop, Al
Assistant Director — Transportation
Frederick County Department of Planning and Development
cc: Michael T. Ruddy, AICP, Director of Planning and Development
Candice Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director of Planning and Development
March 19, 2018
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 5401665-6395
Ms. Marian Harders
Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh, PC
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Woodbridge, Virginia 22192
RE: Proposed Rezoning for Stonewall IV
Property Identification Numbers (PINs): 43-A-21, 43 -A -21B,
43-19-4, 43-A-24
Dear Ms. Harders:
I have had the opportunity to review the draft rezoning application for the Stonewall IV
site. This application seeks to rezone four properties totaling 88.91 from the RA (Rural
Areas) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. This review is
generally based upon the proffer statement submitted on February 13, 2018. Prior to
formal submission to the County, please ensure that these comments and all review
agency comments are adequately addressed. At a minimum, a letter describing how each
of the agencies and their comments have been addressed should be included as part of the
submission.
Northeast Land Use Plan — Land Use. The 2035 Comprehensive Plan and the
Northeast Land Use Plan provide guidance on the future development of the
property. The property is located within the SWSA. The 2035 Comprehensive
Plan identifies these properties with an industrial land use designation. The
proposed M1 Zoning is generally consistent with the Northeast Land Use Plan as
it relates to this area. The land use plan depicts future Route 37 on the western
boundary of the properties and access to Route 37 from Lenoir Drive. The
application fully addresses future Route 37 through the property; however, the
access to Route 37 is not acknowledged in the impact statement or the proffers.
2. Generalized Development. The GDP should be revised to remove all buildings,
the GDP should be more general and show the property, proffered improvements,
access and buffers. The GDP should also be reduced to 11 x 17 or 8 1/2 x 11.
3. Proffer 1 — Development and Use of the Property.
Page 2
Ms. Marian Harders
RE: Stonewall IV
March 19, 2018
a. Proffer 1.1 states that two buildings will be constructed, given there is a
gross square footage cap, it appears the requirement for two structures
may not be necessary. Also, consider eliminating use limitation for
warehousing and distribution.
4. Proffer 3 - Utilities. Proffer 3.1 requires the use of public water and sewer and
the construction of improvements to provide such service. This proffer should be
removed as it is already required. Only requirements above and beyond all
County requirements should be provided in a proffer statement.
5. Proffer 4—_Stormwater Management/Environment. Stormwater management
is a site development requirement. Existing County requirements should be
removed. Only requirements above and beyond all County requirements should
be provided in a proffer statement.
6. Proffer 6 —Lighting. Building mounted and pole mounted lighting and the use
of downcast full cutoff fixtures are required by the Zoning Ordinance. Only
requirements above and beyond all County requirements should be provided in a
proffer statement.
7. Access Easement. The access easement to parcel 43-A-23 does not align with
the proposed access to the subject properties off Lenoir Drive. Provide
clarification on the location of these two entrance points. Staff recommends that
the applicant work with the residential property to relocate the access easement to
align with the new entrance proposed on Lenoir Drive. This is also the general
location of the future connection to existing Route 37 identified in the
Comprehensive Plan (see comment 1).
8. Transportation Comments. Please note that the transportation comments on the
rezoning application from John Bishop, Assistant Director - Transportation, are
being provided to you in a separate letter. Staff may also provide additional
comments related to the proposed changes if warranted subject to adjustments
requested by VDOT.
9. Agency Comments. Please provide appropriate agency comments from the
following agencies: Virginia Department of Transportation, Frederick County
Department of Public Works, Frederick County Fire Marshal, Frederick Water,
Virginia Department of Health, the County Attorney, the Historic Resources
Advisory Board (HRAB) and the Frederick -Winchester Service Authority.
Page 3
Ms. Marian Harders
RE: Stonewall IV
March 19, 2018
10. Fees. Based on the fees adopted by the Board of Supervisors on April 23, 2008,
the rezoning fee for this application would be $18,891.00 based upon acreage of
88.91 acres.
All of the above comments and reviewing agency comments should be appropriately
addressed before staff can accept this rezoning application. Please feel free to contact me
with questions regarding this application.
Sincerely,
Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZAS
Assistant Director
CEP/pd
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
5401665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
March 28, 2018
Ms. Marian Hardes
Walsh Colucci Lubeley & Walsh PC
4310 Prince William Parkway, Suite 300
Woodbridge, Virginia 22192
RE: Request for Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) Comments — Stonewall IV Rezoning
Property Identification Numbers (PINs): 43-A-21, 43 -A -21B, 43-19-4 and 43-A-24
Zoning: RA (Rural Areas) District
Dear Ms. Hardes:
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) considered the above referenced
rezoning application during their meeting on March 27, 2018. The HRAB reviewed information from the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources (VDHR) and the Cultural Resource Survey and Assessment of
Glengary provided by the Applicant, This site is identified by Property Identification Numbers 43-A-21,
43 -A -21B, 43-19-4 and 43-A-24, in the Stonewall Magisterial District. The Stonewall IV rezoning seeks to
rezone 88.91 acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers.
Historic Resources Advisory Board Comments:
The Virginia Department of Historic Resources identifies one mapped property located on the subject
property DHR #034-1099 - Glengary. This structure is potentially eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places. After reviewing this information and the Applicant's materials and proposals, the Historic
Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) recommended approval of the Rezoning with the following:
Applicant perform a Historic American Building Survey (HABS) — Standard III for the Glengary site.
• Institute protocols for the demolishment of Glengary to ensure preservation and/or
documentation of historical features.
Thank you for the chance to comment on this application. Please call if you have any questions or concerns
Sincerely,
Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director
CEP/pd
cc: Chris Oldman, HRBA Chairman
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000