HomeMy WebLinkAboutHRAB 01-16-07 Meeting AgendaCOUNT' of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/665-5651
FAX: 540/665-6395
MEMORANDUM
TO: Historic Resources Advisory Board
FROM: Kevin T. Henry, Planning Technician''_
RE: January Meeting Agenda
DATE: January 4, 2007
The Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) will be meeting on
Tuesday, January 16, 2007, at 6:30 p.m., in the Board of Suuervisors' Executive
Session Room* in the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street,
Winchester, Virginia. The HRAB will discuss the following items:
AGENDA
1. Election of Officers
2. September & November 2006 Minutes
3. Interstate 81 Distribution Center Rezoning (Triad Engineering)
4. Other
Please contact this office if you will not be able to attend the meeting. Thank you.
*PLEASE NOTE MEETING LOCATION
Access to this building is limited during the evening hours. Therefore, it will be
necessary to enter the building through the rear door of the Board Room. I would
encourage committee members to park in the county parking lot located behind the
new addition (accessible off of Cameron Street).
KTH/bad
Attachments
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB)
September 19, 2006
Held in the Board of Supervisors Executive Session Room of the County
Administrative Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, VA.
Members Present: Rhoda Kriz (Chairman), Elizabeth Fravel, Martin Killingbeck, Felicia
Hart, Gary Oates (Planning Commission Liaison), Virginia McClure.
Members Absent: Maral Kalbian (Consultant).
Staff. Kevin Henry- Planning Technician, Susan Eddy- Senior Planner
Agenda Items: August 2006 Minutes, Village at Opequon Rezoning (PHR&A),
Historical Plaques, and Allegheny Power (powerline through Opequon district).
Other: State grant opportunity, Stephens City historical landscape preservation
The meeting began at 6:30 P.M. with the HRAB unanimously approving the August 2006
minutes.
Since the applicant was not in attendance for the meeting the HRAB amended to skip the
Rezoning application until later in the evening, thus giving the applicant a chance to
arrive late and still make a presentation.
The third item on the agenda for the meeting was for the HRAB to approve a historical
plaque application that staff received for Valley Mill Farm. Staff gave a brief description
of Valley Mill Farm also mentioning that the property had recently been recognized by
the National Register. The HRAB unanimously felt that Valley Mill Farm deserves a
historical plaque. The HRAB also felt that the property known as the Opequon House
would also qualify for a plaque. Opequon House has yet to submit an application, but
staff has been in contact with the property owner.
The fourth item on the agenda was in regards to Allegheny Power extending power lines
through Frederick County, in particular the Opequon Magisterial District. Planning staff
felt that it would be appropriate to bring this request before the HRAB, to identify
historical areas the power lines should stay away from. Senior Planner Eddy gave a
description of the project Allegheny is intending to perform. Commissioner Oates and
Mr. Killingbeck felt it would be appropriate for the properties identified in the Rural
Landmark Survey as potentially significant to have I/4 mile buffers in which the power
lines would have to travel around. The HRAB also felt that clusters of historical
properties should also have the same buffer requirements.
The HRAB decided to proceed with the Rezoning application even though the applicant
was not present. Chairman Kriz felt that the applicant should fill out a Preliminary
Information Form (PIF) through the state with regards to the Adams House. The Adams
House is currently not identified in the Rural Landmark Survey as being potentially
significant. Since the Survey was done over 15 years ago, the HRAB felt it would be
appropriate if the State was able to comment on the property. The HRAB also felt that it
would be appropriate for a Phase I archeological survey of strictly the areas around the
primary dwelling and accessory buildings. The HRAB believed that the applicant should
also proffer a vegetative buffer around the Adams House. The HRAB requested that the
applicant officially come before them before proceeding to the Planning Commission.
In other matters, Ms. Fravel mentioned that in Stephens City a garden club monitors
historical landscaping throughout the city. Chairman Kriz suggested that the HRAB
members can attend those meetings; and also that the HRAB should encourage saving
historical trees within rezoning proposals or identify trees that are native, but rare in the
area for the developer to provide as part of a landscaping proffer.
Staff mentioned again the options for applying for a local/state grant that would allow for
the county to identify historical districts, and place these districts within the Frederick
County Comprehensive Policy I .
With no other business the HRAB adjourned at 7:40 P.M.
Frederick County Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB)
November 21, 2006
Held in the Board of Supervisors Executive Session Room of the County
Administrative Building at 107 N. Kent Street, Winchester, VA.
Members Present: Rhoda Kriz (Chairman), Elizabeth Fravel, Mara] Kalbian (Consultant),
Gary Oates (Planning Commission Liaison).
Members Absent: Martin Killingbeck, Felicia Hart, Virginia McClure, Mary Turner.
Staff: Kevin Henry- Planning Technician
Agenda Items: September 2006 Minutes, Star Fort application grant, and Willow Run
rezoning proposal (Greenway Engineering).
Other: Allegheny Powerlines through Back Creek Magisterial District.
The meeting began at 6:30 P.M. without a quorum. Since there were only two voting
members present, the September 2006 minutes could not be approved.
The second order of business on the agenda was to inform the HRAB of a grant
application for Star Fort that will be presented to the Board of Supervisors in December.
The HRAB had no comments for the grant application and were pleased that Star Fort
would be receiving a grant to help implement the previously approved management plan
from 1999.
The third item on the agenda for the meeting was for the HRAB to revaluate the Willow
Run rezoning proposal that was previously on the agenda in October 2005. Staff
explained to the HRAB the reason for the proposals second appearance was due to drastic
changes in the land uses, specifically in areas effecting historical properties.
Mr. Evan Wyatt representing Greenway Engineering explained to the HRAB that this
rezoning proposal was more oriented towards the county's vision of the Urban
Development Area (UDA), by creating a mixed use community. Mr. Wyatt had
addressed a previous comment from the HRAB with respect to providing landscaping
along Cedar Creek Grade to help screen the Homespun historical property.
Most of the HRAB's focus of comments was related to the #740 and #750 Houses. The
#750 House has been eligible for the National registry since 1993. The new rezoning
proposal has changed the land use where these particular properties are located to
commercial and single family residences, instead of green open space as it was in the
previous application. Though buffering for these properties is not within the proffers,
Mr. Wyatt stated that buffering options would be displayed in the Master Development
Plan (MDP). The HRAB expressed great concern in the appropriateness of placing
intrusive land uses next to historic structures without proper mitigation. From this
conversation the HRAB recommended that the viewsheds for the 4740 and #750 Houses
be established in way that does not negatively affect the historic value of the two
properties.
Ms. Kalbian suggested that the property owners should be informed by staff of the
possible preservation easement opportunities. The HRAB concurred and felt that Staff
should setup a meeting with the property owners and appropriate conservation related
staff to provide a better understanding of the opportunities outside the rezoning.
Ms. Fravel mentioned that there were no proffers associated with archeological features
of the property. In the previous proposal the applicant had not properly addressed
archeology on the site. Therefore, the HRAB agreed to submit the same comment from
the previous meeting in that the applicant needed to further address archeological and
environmental characteristics of the site.
The HRAB decided to proceed and provide the Planning Commission with all previous
comments as well as the need to provide viewshed protection for the 4740 and #750
Houses, conservation easement information conveyance to the property owners, and
further archeological surveys.
The HRAB was then given a brief overview from Staff and Commissioner Oates of a
rezoning request that will be taking place on a Civil War site just South of Redbud Road.
The rezoning request (RP (Residential Performance) => RA (Rural Areas)) is being made
to help further ensure preservation of this site. The HRAB did not have any comments
for the rezoning and were satisfied to see a project that will provide a large tract of land
towards historical preservation.
The final item of the evening was for the HRAB to review the Allegheny Power Line
proposal through the Back Creek Magisterial District. Staff provided a map with current
lines as well as the identified potentially significant historical properties with 1/4 mile
buffers. Staff had suggested the HRAB provide the same comments as they did for the
Opequon Magisterial District portion of the line extension by placing %4 mile buffers
around the potentially significant properties. The HRAB concurred and felt that any of
the properties on the National registry should provide a %z mile buffer of protection.
There being no other business the HRAB adjourned at 8:15 P.M.
Item # 3
Interstate 81 Distribution Center Rezoning Proposal
The Historic Resources Advisory Board has been requested to review and provide
comment on the 1-81 Distribution Center rezoning proposal, which has been submitted by
Triad Engineering. The proposal seeks to rezone 59.077 acres from the RA (Rural Areas)
Zoning District to the M1 (Light Industrial) Zoning District. The property is located east
of Interstate 81, North of Cedar Hill Road (Route 671) and west of Martinsburg Pike
(Route 11) (see location map).
The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley, published by the National Park
Service, does not identify the I-81 Distribution Center rezoning site or the surrounding
areas as being part of a battlefield. The Rural Landmarks Survey Report for Frederick
County Virginia identifies one structure located on the property, which is potentially
significant:
• The Nathaniel Branson House (#34-926)
There are also two sites that are located within close proximity to the I-81 Distribution
Center project. These properties are:
• The Branson Spring House (434-137)
• The Branson School (#34-927)
Please find attached for your information: a map of the site; the impact analysis; and, the
proffer statement provided by the applicant. Representatives of the applicant will be
available at the HRAB meeting to provide additional information on the proposed
rezoning. Staff will be seeking comments from the HRAB on the historical elements
possibly impacted by the proposed development. The comments will be included in the
rezoning application package for the I-81 Distribution Center rezoning proposal when it
is submitted.
� a
w
a g,
Frederick County
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202
Winchester, Virginia 22601
Telephone: (540) 665-5651
Fax: (540) 665-6395
HISTORIC RESOURCE ADVISORY BOARD
REVIEW APPLICATION
DATE STAMP
MEETING DATE
Description of Application: Please describe briefly the request of the application: (rezoning, master development plan,
conditional use nermitl. PlPace hp e..A&m... n ------ _ r
This application is not complete until all of the following information has been provided to the Department of
Planning and Development. Please check the materials that have been submitted.
Copy of required application as described in 1. l (1.1.1-1.1.4)
✓ Description of proposed development or construction project, including proposed uses and general timeframe for
development (1.2)
✓ Status of any identified historic or archaeological resources on the site or adjacent to the site (e.g, located in any identified
historic area, survey area, or battlefield site or individually listed on a local, state or national historic register, relevant
information on record with the Virginia Department of Historic Resources) and presence of other historic structures or
significant landscape features or archaeological sites; (1.3)
✓ Photographs (color) of all historic resources on the property (1.4)
Please note that the applicant or his/her appointed representative must be present at the meeting.
Historic Sites and Structures
A search for historical structures on the subject property was conducted through the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR). A maps only archives search
utilizing the DHR cultural inventory for archaeological sites and architectural
structures revealed one potential historical structure, identified as File No. 034-0926
(Nathaniel Branson House), on the subject site. Subsequently, a case file search was
performed on this structure to indicate whether the resource is listed on the registers,
or has been evaluated for possible inclusion on the registers. Investigation of the case
files indicated the structure should not be investigated for possible register potential.
Triad Engineering, INC Architectural Resources
Inwood & Stephenson Quad/Frederick County 11 C Archaeological Sites
Map Created by: L. MericalNDHR S
—j USGS Quadrangle
Date:10126/06
C—D County Boundaries
VIRGINIA
File no, 34-926
r
HISTORIC LANDMARKS COMMISSION INegative no(). 10628,_106,
SURVEY FORM
Historic name Locust Level, Roy Boyce House Common name T3ranson, Nathaniel House
County/Town/City Frederick
treet address or route number Rt. 11 mnrti,
vate or period ca.1820--40, ca.1840-601 ca.1880-1910
Original owner Nathaniel Branson Architect/builder/craftsmen
Original use Residential
Present owner Roy Boyce Source of name Quarles, #25
Present owner address Clearbrook, Va 22601 Source of date Quarles, #25
Stories 2
Present use Residential Foundation and wall const'n Brick & frame j,alls on
Acreage 117 stone foundation
State condition of structure and environs Roof type Gable w/ standing seam metal
Good
State potential threats to structure Unictown
Note any archaeological interest Unknown
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes no _y_
Architectural description (N)te sficant features of pian, structural system and interior and exterior decoration,
taking care to point out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all alterations
and additions. List any outbuildings and their approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.}
1
This house was built in four sections beginning with the original asymmetrical 2 story
windo:vs w/ woode
3 bay 5 -course American bond brick section (ca. 1820-1840) which has 6/6 n
lintels and short, flat brick arches above. This portion has a standing seam metal roof,
a low stone basement, an int. end brick chimney, a 1/I attic window in the gable end, and
a single transom aver the front entrance. The rear entrance has a pedimented hood if/ plain
wooden supports over the door. The remaining three wings all appear to be late 19th century
additions and include; a side 2 story 2 bay 5 -course American bond brick wing (ca.1840-60)
v/ 6/6 windows, an int. end brick chimney, and an enclosed rear I story porch ./ I6 -light
bay window (ca.1975); a side 2 story 2 bay frame wing (ca.1880-1910) which sits at a 90 de-
gree angle to the house and has 6/6 windows, louvered shutters, a single light attic win-
dow in the gable end, and new asphalt shingle siding; and a side 2 story 2 bay frame wing
(ca.1840-1860) w/ 6/6 windows, paired 6 -light windows, and some modern 1/1 windows. This
section also has an attic window in the gable end, new asphalt siding, and an enclosed
rear 1 story porch.
The Colonial Revival front porch on the original section, a 20th century addition, is a
2 story full height 3 bay parch :f/ full height tuscan columns, dentils in the eaves, and
ought iron
wr
same elevation hasnbeeneexpanded andtveneered inlbrick. pNef a -,wings w/umetalllsupportss
have also been added.
Outbuildings include a frame meathouse and shed, a large frame barn, and a modern
concrete block garage. The property sets back off Rt. 11 North and landscape features
include a flagpole and mature trees and bushes.
Interior inspected? No
i Historical significance (Chain of title; individuats, families, events, etc., associated with the property.}
j Dec 21 1878 Joseph Branson td Nathaniel B. Branson
Jan 11 1880 Nathaniel B. Branson to Nancy Holmes Branson
May 15, 1899 Nancy Holnes Branson & hiers to J. William Riley
Nov 21, 1927 J, William Riley to Elizabeth M. Riley
March 12, 1949 Elizabeth M. Riley to Rey R. Boyce, Jr.
See Quarles, #25.
Sources and bibliography
Published sources (Books, articles, etc., with bibliographic data.)
Quarles, Some Old Homes, #25.
Primary sources (Manuscript documentary or graphic materials; give location.)
Names and addresses of persons interviewed
Plan (indicate locations of rooms, doorways, windows, alterations, etc.)
Site plan (Locate and identify outbuildings, dependencies and significant topographical features.)
Name, address and title of recorder Dam
Maral S. Kalbian
{j�. •r' ''w / � ,' -, : _ teem ti .. o .'
Mu
t
-'r7�� 1 i. �; }'3`:_'r'' _6159' �'` �'' "•` BM 548 '
a ° p JVTERC�ANGE~ -
�� nest )
56 4
f ,
646
'( • � .: .. p c�- . � 67.0 ' - - ,1.
'l ;•. - .. ,. .._.__ ; - Y �.= �—�__.. 654 / .
67
h r BM 626
Z yn
N as
kk
C ar Hill
Ch
Its1 II ', 1 , �, r,� .I _1 1/' '' 6SQ -,� �'+ •,�(�%►��f _;- �~=' rte..' ° �Gll ! �.
1.•`� c 'jam �.•.` , ' it p '.^` -'1 'uy�y,,��� � '
LI�u�L3tloow
tJi_f
' �,i : � _.,, ,;: X71 _,: _. �_• _- _ __ _ r
p 8 M 622 671 }
r ,
� � iii �`•"bb �, ,, b /� __�.. _
r � .,r'h, �.: ',_.• � o vYlLE '``�:�'., Q� �{ •, ,
it •ti - f / ti
p It qf� 64441
II Sip
!i
It
III NTERd { i
sR ]ear roof:-'
.: 1 a r € r s / 61 Was
• a �. t
4` ing �Qo u` ternk
• �. r a Q , t/ ' ) 'ti-,` I .
66 ��E,g y. t3 rO y �•/ � ♦ f / J s.. • ' r •, .. � 1 • `� -.� ? •t G(iCp i� ' (/ (-1
tt ` �Rda
w
{
"ter — � :suµsti �..r t ., �+. � �•:;
I•
I
4 I
•
yy }} h
i Y
lI T 41,
AA
+
I Y P
-�-'r: •.iii — 4' •�i o- .'"c
"'# yi^,�•K\'i
a,t ) y :h
NOW
SO
MEN
y
.. ;..- .. ,_ .• +SF.u44�v,a,tr t�'}qq�+3�t'k '�-tr �y�s�lt{
,t Asa u ,
NlS�tY
LiU
1
VIRGINIA File no.
DIVISION OF HISTORIC LANDMARK
Negative no(s). x473
iR v
SURVEY FORM
Historic name Greenwood Farm Common name Branson House
County)%wn/City on the northern edge of Clearbrook
Street address or route number Rt. 11 North
USGS Quad Inwood Date or period c.1740-50, c.1790, c.1600, c.1820-40.
Original owner Evan Thomas Architect/builder/craftsmen
Original use residential unknown
Present owner Mr. James Macgregor Source of name Taylor's Sketchbook, Quarles, Some Old..
Present owner address Route 1 Box 177-A Source of date current owner, architectural evidence.
Clear Brook, VA 22624 Stories 2
Present use residential Foundation and wall const'n all three sections are built of
Acreage unknown stone on stone foundations.
Roof type Gable w/ standin seam metal.
State condition of structure and environs House and environs are in good condition. The spring house
State potential threats to structure is in poor condition.
Note any archaeological interest unknown
unknown
Should be investigated for possible register potential? yes W no ❑
Architectural description (Note significant features of plan, structural system and interior and exterior decoration, taking care to point
out aspects not visible or clear from photographs. Explain nature and period of all alterations and additions. List any outbuildings and
their approximate ages, cemeteries, etc.)
The Branson house was built in three phases. The earliest portion is the 1st story of the 1�
story stone section on the east end of the house. It is 2 bays wide with an interior end stone
chimney, 6/6 windows and has a gable roof which drops off to a one story shed roof on the north
side (this was added later as well as the i story). A modern 1 story shed -roofed closed -in
porch is attached to the east gable end. This one story stone section was probably built by
Edwin Thomas around 1740-1750. The next section of the house was built in 1790 (according to tl
owner who says that this date is inscribed in the chimney of this portion of the house). This
1790s•portion is the 3 -bay section to the west of the original portion just described. It is
also built of stone and is :symmetrical with 6/6 windows, a:central door with a 3 -light transom,
and has 2 interior end stone chimneys. The east gable end of this section has 2, 4 -light square
attic windows. The north side of this section has a single bay pedimented portico with paired
chamfered columns that could date to the ante-bellum period. This porch is similar to one that
is illustrated in Taylor's sketchbook of 1864 depicting the south porch. At the same time of
this 2 story stone section, a � story and a rear --I story shed -roofed addtion were added to the
original 1 story section of the house. These two additions were made of stone. The rear i story
sbed-roof addition has a corner brick chimney. The � story section has 2, 4 -light square attic
windows in the east gable end and a 6 -light k story window on the south (front) end. The third
section of the Branson house to be built was the western -most 3 bays of the house. This sectior
is assymetrical and is made up of a door with a 9 -light transom and 3 -light sidelights. The
enframent is a plain lintel with stepped and fluted moidings. A modern gable hood has replaced
the original single bay pedimented porch. This section has 6/6 windows, an interior end stone
chimney & 2,6 -light square attic windows in the gable end. This section was built c.1830-40.
The Branson house is in very original condition except that the plaster that was originally on
the tato additions has been removed. I don't think the original portion was ever plastered.
The original porches are also missing as well as the louvered shutters. Late in the 19th century
a 2 story frame wing was built on either side of the 1790s section. This 1 bay 2 story wing
was removed by the previous owners who then patched the stone where it had been cut. This is
is why the stonework does not -.match at that point. In Taylor's sketchbook, one of the most
Interior inspected? (see continuation sheet) Interior not inspected.
Historical significance (Chain of tide; individuals, families, events, etc., associated with the property.)
According to Quarles:
1735 Governor and council of Virginia to Evan Thomas
1755 Thomas to daughter, Martha Thomas
1758 Martha 'Phomas married Henry Rees
1779 Catherine Rees, daughter of Martha and
1772 Henry Rees to Catherine Rees
1827 Abraham Branson to Joseph Branson
1878 Joseph Branson to David Branson
1906 to Ann Branson and son William Branson
1916 to John J. Ridgetvay
n.d.to the Romines
n.d. to James Macgregor
Henry married Abraham Branson.
The Bransons were faithful memberscof the Hopewell Society of Friends.
Sources and bibliography
Published sources (Books, articles, etc,, with bibliographic data.)
merles, Garland R. Some Old Homes in Frederick County
VA., 1971 #24, pp.45-47.
Taylor, James E. The James E. Taylor Skethcbook: With
Sheridan up the Shenandoah Valley in 1864 The Western
Reserve Historical Society: Cleveland, Ohio, 1989, pp.lE
Primary sources (Manuscript documentary or graphic materials;
give location.)
Plan (indicate locations of rooms, doorways. windows. alterations_ etc-)
,vatucZI auu au.. as w v,__ unto __-
74.
Site plan (Locate and identify outbuildings, dependencies and sienilicant to
nn,rranhical fratllrec i
f
J T T IT;
�-_I-
i I _ (;Ili.ilil�Tl
., L! -,
i.f
11''r lI��rf
,
11�3t
t I-lr
j i I,
1r{"i1+i.'i,-4-
—,
L
• 1
1
F.
I �
i
,
f I
}
_
r -
-
--+f
L
I
!
j-
-
- V-1
1
1
-Tj
-f4-
�
--
f-
-
-
I , t ,- r r I � _,-I + i l � ^, � � I . __i..�-
j
4,4'_
�
-t-4 r I-
�•'
-_
�_ -
-
- _
Ji
+ ,
t
I J-11-i�
I-1
ii,Y:�•}_T
{-�;�
7 � i:.
1�
1-
-tt
�
,�
�.
_f
i�+.
� + j
11
+
11
'-
j
(
..
i
_ I�-•i`t_
t-
-1
I
L
i
[(
k
Site plan (Locate and identify outbuildings, dependencies and sienilicant to
nn,rranhical fratllrec i
f
J T T IT;
�-_I-
i I _ (;Ili.ilil�Tl
., L! -,
i.f
11''r lI��rf
,
11�3t
t I-lr
j i I,
1r{"i1+i.'i,-4-
• 1
I �
i
,
f I
}
1'j. ''t,
1
1
�
I , t ,- r r I � _,-I + i l � ^, � � I . __i..�-
_ _ �-,'�; _� I
�
-t-4 r I-
�•'
-_
�_ -
-
- _
Ji
Name.adc[ressand title or,ccordcr Maral S. Kalbian Architectural Historian °ai' 11/89
;.;_
53'
17-30-0 e ►,.._. �\ y.
u , ;r•'s6 , INTERCHANGE /
.ui
.. 66I � �.1f Wbt3i{. _ ;''w3'� g� •P. � .. _ - c - �•��,..••-• - I --
f' f tJ ti
C/ ar Hilt 't'* rel
t �•_ j
.a- •? � �'!�-�•, `_ e _ 'fid ,1
I •�esley Ch
_y' 'ti.H3 071 � -Y•.•' - _ .1
,f_ �C -
l�- N. t, ° 87.,622
. amu:- f •
4150
' � '„ � `�Z �' v :.�, ._:M- ,' rte. �,•... n1
pig
f aSO
280000 FEET
iW VA)
r1` �� c' 'iINTERCNGE
•_. I .,��,.._: rApv GK"''`:Q
.I26
4`�'•-�s�'.o�x�cr«'6uPft.�i1'`j ,, N.�.'�• aafhirgt1aT.x,i,;e'/'.✓"ti..• ft' I 'i ".ti.= c.i1 R- o,A..: A �1314-1314- •fes•''�3,.A�_ ,.e:a�ryf ..r.00t'
a 6Z4349 g!BieredrNr house 4rn nk•' -^k`a "9'jt;'�• •?-,T`8:r. 19 • . (JaC$.li,r'r -'`r• !n'6''f' }I.r. "}I-
i✓
-�j�•_
l
I�6a l_ ClearLroA h jLL+ ie:''t`
r -J
}� S g' / f 626 �k 'rrt _ . ,,,... ''ten z" /`
7B"D7'3Q'r 239D000 FEET tW. VAI N'INCT4L£ST£R 6 Tt7.
750 '� r`e1 j F
wrNP"F7"S R 0
0 9,M1. 751 6' 752
Mapped, edited, and published by the Geological Surrey
in cooperation with Commonwealth of Virginia Division of
gee Mineral Resources * '
MN -----
Control by USGS and USC&GS GN Itv�a 0
Topography by photogrammetrlc methods from aerial2
photographs taken 1963• Field checked 1966 �W
33 3 MiLS� t•5?' '
RolycOnlc projection, 1927 North American datum 33 MILS
10,000•foot grids based on West Virginia Coordinate system,
north zone, end Virginia Loordinale system, north zone
1000•meter Universal Transverse Mercator grid ticks,
zone 17, shown in blue UTM LINQR'AND ION -F C µTEN OF MEETH
DECLINATION TT CENTER 6F SHEET
Fine rets dashed lines indicate selected fence and field lines where THIS MAT
FOR SALE
generally visible on aerial photographs. This information is unchecked AND VIRGINIA DIVISIC
Revisions shown in pLrrr,IN ccmpi(p it r ,.�- :;t i• •, ,_,.r. r: , ..,..- ,, - A FOLDER DESCRI81
w4 i w uy�'td 1�T ��
✓'3 t 3�' �
�
5
tyx
f 1�
..tib $fir f+a
�.
q t
r c
h ..
•
.. . .v
�;�7� � nom` :�
J
VIRGINIA Fle no. 34-927
DIVISION O fUSTORIC LANDMARKS rNegative no(s). ,10629 �
' HISTORIC DISTRICT/BRIEF
SURVEY FORM
CilwTownNillage/Hamlet Rural County Coun[v Frederick
Street address or route number Rt. 11 North U.S.G.S. Quad Inwood
Hi+toricname School #15; Dave's Auto Sales Common name Branson School
Presentuse Residential Building Style Vernacular
Original use School Building Dale(s) ca. 1880-1910
1. Consiruction Materials
wood Irame
L bnck
bond: ❑ English
❑ Flemish
❑ course American
❑ stretcher
❑ other
j ❑stone
0 random rubble
O coursed rubble
❑ ashlar ❑ dressed
❑ rock -faced
G log:
C squared
notching:
❑ V -notch
❑ saddle
❑ square
❑ concrete block
O terra cotta
❑ steel frame
11 other
? C'laddine Material
❑ weatherboard
❑ vertical siding
O board & batten
O shingle:
❑ wood
❑ asbestos
❑ asphalt
❑ bricktex
❑ other
❑ unsquared
Cl half -dovetail
❑ full dovetail
❑ diamond
❑ composition siding
Wtucco
❑ aluminum or vinyl siding
❑ cast iron
❑ sheet metal
❑ enameled metal
❑ glass
3. Stories ( number) 1 '
,#low basement split level Waised basement
4, Bays (number): front ' side (church)
❑ symmetrical Aasymmetrical
5. Roof Type
❑ shed
❑ parapet'?
.)7'gable
❑ pediment?
❑ parapet?
❑ clipped end?
❑ cross gable?
❑ central front gable?
❑ other
G. Roofing Material
❑ hipped
❑ pyramidal?
❑ mansard
0 false mansard
❑ gambrel
❑ flat
❑ parapei?
❑ roof' not visible
shingle
-N�rcomposition (asphalt, asbestos, etc.)
❑ wood
❑ metal
❑ standing seam
❑ corrugated
❑ pressed tin (simulated shingles)
❑ Erle
❑ pantile ❑ flat
❑ slate
❑ not visible
7. Dormers (number): front side
❑ gable ❑ pediment?
❑ shed
❑ hipped
❑ glazed
8. Primary Porch
style _ Vernacular
stories
levels full height bays 3
materials _iron
description and decorative details
Pedimented portico if/ wrought iron supports and
railing.
4. General supplementary description and decoration: New windows in—
cluding bay window, 1/1 windows; corner end chimney;
owner would not allow access to rear of building.
10. Major additions and alterations:
Side 2 bay garage; side 1 story wing; new roofing
material; new ,endows.
11. Outbuildings:
None.
12. Landscape f=eatures
Privacy fence around sides and back of building;
parking lot in front.
13. Significance:
Nova used as residence u/ used car lot in Front; one
Of few schools in area.
Surveyed by: Maral S. Kalbian Date: 11/90
Primary Sources
Published Sources
Interviews
Name
Address
Phone
Date
Name
Address
Phone
Date
Name
Address
Phone
Date
Plan and Massing (Note original features, additions, and alterations)
Drawing of Plan
f
Sketch of Site Plan
Historical Information
0
;,�, � "� Jg3v � :1,1 {; � ,• � ! r ern ,,''� � `°� ,$N� �;,y _ '
d J }• 4538.
v C3
lot, A
r . /
�' , a •, rt,'- -:s� c= j-. -r•,..c, _ ��t� bas •' �
if {`° .%r -• I 'f£RC,HA'NGE+ + �" 1
Best
/ D •� r a ' r1cl
577
13
-7W
1.
S-M 626 59,
• q f , ''' � J ^i
!r F kj,.
'- it U 1 (}
_ 1
ar Hill
I�em
i i r
esley ch it ` . ! n •+ ' , • '_'f .
� ,� •.� �! - _ fig, I
�SuFi5}aton
loq-'`
• 683' _ .
'�►� - •^ i Q % .3�9.� '�1?�-ate � _ 'Y ^ _ . �,
6M 622 671 /
) ! t..-.� jj_,,.._ Z
tq
644.P /t ,
71
NTERC NG£ 3
C x Up „!,�__ // ) �• a�learrookti
s2aspa
vn M4
sOJon
t_ it
P-MIS7
rg�f.�&
Yt
<" a
P-MIS7
rg�f.�&
Yt
Frederick County, Virginia
Rezoning Application Materials
for
1-81 Distribution Center
Stonewall Magisterial District
November 2006
Prepared by:
Triad Engineering, Inc.
200 Aviation Drive
P.O. Box 2397
Winchester, Virginia 22604
Project No. 07-04-0535
Phone: (540) 667-9300 Fax: (540) 667-2260
Email: winchester(aE,triadeng.com
www.triadeng.com
Table of Contents
I. Application
IL Summary
III. Impact Analysis
A. Site Background and History
B. Location and Access
C. Site Suitability
D. Traffic
E. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply
F. Site Drainage
G. Solid Waste and Disposal Facilities
H. Historic Sites and Structures
I. Impact on Community Facilities
IV. Frederick County Impact Model
V. Proffer Statement
VI. Agency Comment Sheets
VII. Survey Plat & Deed
VIII. Tax Ticket
APPLICATION
REZONING APPLICATION FORM
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
To be completed by Planning Staff
Fee Amount Paid $
Zoning Amendment Number Date Received
C Hearing Date BOS Hearing Date
The following information shall be provided by the applicant:
All parcel identification numbers, deed book and page numbers may be obtained from the Office of
the Commissioner of Revenue, Real Estate Division, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester.
I. Applicant:
Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575-2436
Address: C/O Triad Engineering, Inc., 200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, VA 22602
2. Property Owner (if different than. above)
Name: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr. Telephone: (540) 550-5027
Address: PO Box 67
Clearbrook, VA 22624
3. Contact person if other than above
Name: John L. Knott. III
Telephone: (215) 575-2436
4. Checklist: Check the following items that have been included with this application.
Location map Agency Comments
Plat Fees
Deed to property Impact Analysis Statement
Verification of taxes paid Proffer Statement
11
5. The Code of Virginia allows us to request full disclosure of ownership in relation to
rezoning applications.
Please list below all owners or parties in interest of the land to be rezoned:
Estate of Roy Riley Boyce Jr.
BPG Properties, Ltd.
6. A) Current Use of the Property: Agricultural with existing residence
B) Proposed Use of the Property: 739,000 sf Warehouse with 11,000 sf Office
7. Adjoining Property:
PARCEL ID NUMBER
33-A-108
33-A-111
33-A-112
USE
Agricultural
Residential
Agricultural
ZONING
RA
RA
RA
8. Location: The property is located at (give exact location based on nearest road and distance
from nearest intersection, using road names and route numbers):
Approximately 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 intersection with state route
671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by Interstate Route 81 and on the east by
Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike).
12
9. The following information should be provided according to the type of rezoning
proposed :
Number of Units Proposed
Single Family homes: N/A Townhome: NIA Multi -Family: NIA
Non -Residential Lots: NIA Mobile Home: N/A Hotel Rooms: N/A
Scluare Footage of Proposed Uses
Office: 11,000 Service Station: N/A
Retail: N/A Manufacturing: NIA
Restaurant: N/A Warehouse: 739,000
Other: N/A
10. Signature:
I (we), the undersigned, do hereby respectfully make application and petition the Frederick
County Board of Supervisors to amend the zoning ordinance and to change the zoning map
of Frederick County, Virginia. I (we) authorize Frederick County officials to enter the
property for site inspection purposes.
I (we) understand that the sign issued when this application is submitted must be placed at
the front property line at least seven days prior to the Planning Commission public hearing
and the Board of Supervisors' public hearing and maintained so as to be visible from the road
right-of-way until the hearing.
I (we) hereby certify that this application and its accompanying materials are true and
accurate to the best of my (our) knowledge.
Applicant(s).Date:
BPG Properties, Ltd.
Date:
�
Owner(s): �O Date:
Date:
13
Adjoining Property Owners
Rezoning
Owners of property adjoining the land will be notified of the Planning Commission and the Board of
Supervisors meetings. For the purpose of this application, adjoining property is any property
abutting the requested property on the side or rear or any property directly across a public
right-of-way, a private right -of --way, or a watercourse from the requested property. The
applicant is required to obtain the following information on each adjoining property including the
parcel identification number which may be obtained from the office of the Commissioner of
Revenue. The Commissioner of the Revenue is located on the 2nd floor of the Frederick County
Administrative Building, ,107 North Kent Street.
14
roperty Identification Number
Address
d Lee Bragg
P.O. Box 174
Clearbrook, VA 22624
-111
r
les W. Orndoff Sr. & Joline Shepard
2897 Martinsburg Pike
Clearbrook, VA 22656
-112
Name Donald S. Cline
Property # 33-A-108
4123 Martinsburg Pike
Clearbrook, VA 22624
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
Name
Property #
14
II
SUMMARY
II. General Criteria and Summary
The BPG Properties, Ltd. site "I-81 Distribution Center" lies outside the UDA and
within the SWSA of Frederick County, fronting on approximately 2077 feet of
Martinsburg Pike (U. S. Route 11) and is adjacent to Interstate Route 81. The site
is located approximately 0.61+/- north of the Route 11 intersection with state
route 671 (Cedar Hill).
The applicant believes it is time for the site to be rezoned and placed into the M-1
Light Industrial District category. Appropriate proffers have been considered that
mitigate the impacts of this development and offer certain regional transportation
improvements that may be vital to the functioning of the VA route 11 corridor.
The building placement proposed is sensitive to the terrain.
III
IMPACT ANALYSIS
III. Impact Analysis
A. Site Background and History
The I-81 Distribution Center property consists of 2 parcels with PIN #'s 33-((A))-109
& 33-((A))-110. The 59.077 acres of land are located as shown on the attached
Figure 1 Location Map. The site lies outside the Urban Development Area of
Frederick County. (See Figure 2).
The site had historically been used for agriculture. Principle access is provided by
U. S. Route 11 "Martinsburg Pike".
Lr
w
e
ars'
v
.0
�
9'
T
JQ
rr
J
1 R
rX�}
4
hi
113
i
a �
.r *d
ev
IL
ICENTER ER
FREDERICK COUNTY, CENT R
TAS
Drawn by
DatetIO/24/06
Job No.07-06-0072
NPla en
TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC.
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
LOCATION MAP
DOH
Checked by
Cadd file no.,
LOCATIONMAP.DVG
Scale, N/A
FIGURE I
22 f
3
4
-
1
en Spring
4
n6a
esb ro
Glime
23
30
1
- -- 32 _--
� 34,
_
rook
522Al
Haypeld
_s
'i r
►Y ens
tepe fan
42,E '
43
4
f
Leetown
,Raialnd ill , (r"
Ou
7
37
J
69
1�(P. 3 :s
64 ! 66
``�
t f�T \ r•
—
y
5011 s f,
f
1
164M
I-61 DISTRIBUTION CENTER
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
RED
► Qe^ y
Date,IO/24/06 Job No.107-06-0072
Pwt.
7AD ENMEEnri, DIG
yp Ste, yntamppp
Figure
URBAN DEVELOPMENT AREACadd
cm e y
file no.,
URBAHMEVm0aiTE Scale, N/A
B. Location and Access
The site has 2077' frontage on U. S. Route 11 "Martinsburg Pike" which will be the
principle access to the development parcel. Figure 3 shows the location of the site
with respect to area transportation planning.
The site will utilize U. S. Route 11 for this rezoned use.
There will be two (2) access points for the site. A north and a south driveway with
the north access to service the truck loading docks and parking/drop-off area and the
south access to service predominately employee & visitor parking with truck "relief'
overflow.
Since the site is located within the I-81 corridor and is situated between exits 321 and
323, traffic to and from the site will be provided with options. Refer to Traffic
Impact Analysis by PHR&A for existing and anticipated traffic movements.
739
YFUNDSTOBE
I
PROVIDED .V'
ROVIDED BY
W W
INCHESTER
ME
MEDICAL
CENTER
- r7'
Winchester
r3,
�� SITE
eAp
CONNECTIDN
01
REMOVE ROAD
622
9
j�
"r Crit
.jZ_
17
U2 oe,
'652 ass
628 645 728 nvzlf
Frederick
REMOVE
INTERCHANGE
� County
37
64C--..
P.
StehenS
!,
Iy jrr.
SIT "642
94D
oei 636
r A MD' AREA 001-N-81
16 TO FcIMW ON
—" RC IYNAY ON FEW ALI.^�NAIENT
FN FRJLRYRE:fOVcD,=RMAR[OpLLEp
AOADWAY COMECItON—mro
NOTE Tw P—.—f
ppmm�lu
TYPICAL SECrIONS
U2 Lid
JIM
011 R C16R
TKAD o ns, DIC
TER VIltMMA
1-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
i;x.,
RED
y
EDcvted0/24/06
Job No.107-
I
WINCHESTER AREA
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
C07 �-y
Cidd file no.e
A TUVYMDMT4
Scatee N/A
Kate
Hurb"4
C. Site Suitability
The project and general geographic area is underlain by carbonate sedimentary
bedrock which results in karst terrain. Topographic mapping for the site indicates a
site typical of the karst terrain with gentle slopes and reasonable level plain areas.
Typical of other properties within the area, this site is generally suitable for the
proposed facility.
A site characterization -showing- important environmental- features is included in
Figure 4. The following chart provides an area summary:
I-81 Distribution Center Site Characteristics
Total Project Area
59.077 Acres
Area in Flood Plain
0.00 Acres
Area in Woodlands
0.00 Acres
Area in Steep Slopes
0.00 Acres
Area in Wetlands
0.00 Acres
Lakes & Ponds
0.00 Acres
The property is planned for a warehouse facility with an approximate building area of
750,000 square feet and parking for 100 +/- cars, 200 trailers, and 150 loading docks.
Iii■■
TRIAD ENGINEERING, INC.
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA
I-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
SITE CHARACTERISTICS
TAS I Datet10/24/06 1j.b Na,Q7-06-0072 Plate
Drawn by Nu�ber-
DOH Cadd file no., FIGURE 4
Checked by SITECHARACT.DWG Scale, =N/A
D. Traffic
The transportation impact analysis prepared for this project shows that under the
conditions provided, traffic generation from this site is acceptable and manageable
considering the overall development of the U. S. Route 11/I-81 corridor. Under the
conditions imposed by this rezoning, this roadway system will continue to function at
a level of service of "C" or better during the 2010 background and build -out
conditions, respectively.
As is stated in the Traffic Impact Analysis, the development of this site to
accommodate a 750,000 +/- square foot warehouse facility does not significantly
affect the existing or proposed roadway system.
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the
I-81 Distribution Center
(Formerly the Clearbrook Distribution Center)
Located in:
Frederick County, Virginia
Prepared for:
Berwind Property Group, Ltd..
1500 Market Street
3000 Center Square Street
Philadelphia, PA 19102
Prepared by:
Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc
Eno neers. Surveyors. Planners. Lcndsccpe Architects.
300 Foxcroft Avenue, Suite 200
Tj {[! Martinsburg, West Virginia 25401
T 304.264.2711
a t +�+ F 304.264.3671
December 1, 2006
(Revised from August 28, 2006 submission)
OVERVIEW
Report Summary
Patton Harris Rust & Associates, pc (PHR+A) has prepared this document to
present the traffic impacts associated with the proposed I-81 Distribution Center (formerly
submitted as the Clearbrook Distribution Center) located along the north side of Hopewell
Road, west of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike), in Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed
project is to be comprised of 750,000 square feet of Warehouse with access being provided
to the site via two (2) site -driveways along the west side of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike);
the northern entrance is to be "right-in/right-out' only. The project is to be built -out over a
single transportation phase by the year 2010. Figure I is provided to illustrate the location
of the proposed I-81 Distribution Center with respect to the surrounding roadway network.
Methodology
The traffic impacts accompanying the I-81 Distribution Center were obtained
through the following sequence of activities:
• Assessment of background traffic including other planned projects in the study area,
• Calculation of trip generation for the proposed I-81 Distribution Center,
• Distribution and assignment of the I-81 Distribution Center development -generated
trips onto the completed roadway network,
• Analysis of capacity and level of service using the latest version of the highway
capacity software, HCS+, for existing and future conditions.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
PHR+A conducted AM and PM peak hour manual turning movement counts at the
intersection of Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike)/Hopewell Road/Brucetown Road, Hopewell
Road/ I-81 northbound ramps, Hopewell Road/ I-81 southbound ramps, Route 11/ Rest
Church Road (Route 669), Rest Church Road/ I-81 northbound ramps and Rest Church
Road/ I-81 southbound ramps. ADT (Average Daily Traffic) was established along each of
the study area roadway links using a '17 factor (the ratio of PM peak hour traffic volumes
to 24-hour traffic volumes) of 9.2 % based on the published Virginia Department of
Transportation (VDOT) traffic count data.
Figure 2 shows the existing ADT (Average Daily Trips) and AM/PM peak hour
traffic volumes at key locations throughout the study area. Figure 3 illustrates the
respective existing lane geometry and levels of service. All traffic count data and HCS+
levels of service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report.
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
PHPage I
No Scale
Brucetawntl
i'
L�f
C f�ar�h¢ne r.
Far y -
Figure 1 Vicinity Map -1-8i MAribuflon i ellLer, F edejAck- Com y, VirgiWa
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
RAProject Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
PHPage 2
D
4g
Cumbs `
�g
pp�.,�.}
y !Asst
�zick �rxrrtLrtRd
k � �
�t
Brucetawntl
i'
L�f
C f�ar�h¢ne r.
Far y -
Figure 1 Vicinity Map -1-8i MAribuflon i ellLer, F edejAck- Com y, VirgiWa
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
RAProject Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
PHPage 2
No Scale
,, ry O�
(SS)Ip2 *,�51�71)36i)
(2q)29 E
m
SIt_
Drive # 1
SITE
sit:
Drive #2
4
69(85)
( 127)l9 �-ft132(169)
)105► 1
�4
�ro
/
1
N h
.Ny O ti
N „y
62(47)
tuceto 4 39(46)
w 1 Rcola 54(52)
(6)
)4
(53)52
a �
11 `N AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
Figure 2 Existing Traffic Conditions
A Traffic Impact Anahsis of the I-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: er 1, 21-0
December 1, 2 e PHP A+3
Page 3
Signalized � ti`tr Y
Intersection O Signalized p
LOS—_B(B) Intersection O
LOS=B(B) Z
No Scale
W Oqq�
S
Rest ChIttel) toad
Q Signalized
1 Intersection
LOS=B(B)
11�
Site
Drive#�
SITE
Site
Drive #2 E
p Unsignalized
O Intersection
a� q
Ho ewe]] Road
k Unsignalized
Intersection
m
Bruceto
r4 p wn Road Bf
� °cerOwn
G-.2fD)CROdd
a
� Q
Unsignalized Q
Intersection 11
W
AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
*TIDenotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
T —D -F- A 11 Denotes two-way left turn lane
Figure 3 Existing Lame Geometry and bevels of Service
A Traffic bnpact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
RA
Project Number: 1.4596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Page 4
2010 BACKGROUND CONDITIONS
Based upon the VDOT (Virginia Department of Transportation) historical average
daily traffic data (between years 2002 and 2004) for Route 11 within the vicinity of the site,
a growth rate of 3.5 % was calculated and applied to the existing traffic volumes (shown in
Figure 2) to obtain the 2010 base conditions. Additionally, PHR+A included specific
future developments located within the vicinity of the proposed site. Using the 7th Edition
of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation Report, PHR+A has
provided Table 1 to summarize the 2010 "other developments" trip generation.
Figure 4 shows the 2010 background ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes
at key locations throughout the study area network. Figure 5 shows the respective 2010
background lane geometry and AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of
service worksheets are included in the Appendix section of this report.
Table 1 `
2010 Background Developments
Trip Generation Summary
Code Land Use
Amount
In
AM Peak Hour
Out
Total
In
PM Peak Hour
Out
Total
ADT
Sempeles Property (Partial Build -out)
130 Industrial Park
598,950 SF
336
74
409
106
398
503
3,719
820 Retail
49,000 SF
62
40
102
188
203
391
4,271
Total
398
113
511
293
601
894
7,990
Clearbrook Properties (Full Build -out)
120 GA Heavy Industrial
120,000 SF
54
7
61
3
20
23
180
932 H -T Restaurant
8,000 SF
48
44
92
53
34
87
1,017
Total
102
52
153
56
54
110
1,197
Rutherford's Farm Industrial Park (Full Build -out)
130 Industrial Park
1,400,000 SF
1,022
224
1,246
270
1,018
1,288
9,744
820 Retail
20,000 SF
36
23
60
104
113
216
2,386
Total
1,058
247
1,306
374
1,131
1,504
12,130
North Stephenson Tract OMPS Property
(Full Build -out)
110 Light Industrial
800,000 SF
752
103
855
118
863
981
5,874
Total
752
103
855
118
863
981
5,874
Stephenson Village (Partial Build -out)
210 Single -Family Detached
429 units
77
232
310
255
144
399
4,290
220 Apartment
240 units
20
103
123
100
49
149
1,573
230 Townhouse/Condo
390 units
26
125
150
127
62
189
3,393
251 Elderly Housing - Detach
266 units
29
51
80
78
44
123
1,064
253 Elderly Housing - Attach
72 units
3
2
5
4
3
7
251
Total
155
513
667
564
302
866
10,570
A Traffic Impact Anahsis of the 1-81 Distribution RACeRteT
Project Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
PHPage 5
Figure 4 2010 Background Traffic Conditions
A Traffic Impact Anah sis of the Ajest Distribution Number:
4 96-1- Center
� + Project Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Page 6
Pff-vA
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Page 7
TRIP GENERATION
Using the 7th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip
Generation Report, PHR+A has prepared Table 2 to summarize the trip generation for the
proposed I-81 Distribution Center.
Table 2
Proposed Development: I-81 Distribution Center
Trin Generation Summary
Assumed a worst�ast of I employee per 5000 square feet.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
The distribution of trips, shown in Figure 6, was based upon local travel patterns
for the roadway network surrounding the proposed I-81 Distribution Center site. Figure 7
shows the respective development -generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT
assignments.
2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The I-81 Distribution Center assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2010
background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 8
shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations
within the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and
AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included
in the Appendix section of this report.
A Traffic Impact Analvsis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
PHR+A Project Number: 14596-1 r1, 20 6
December 1, 2006
Page 8
AM Peak Hour
PM Pear Hour
ADT
Code Land Use Amount
In Out Total
In Out Total
150 Warehousing (750,000 SF)1 150 employees
79 31 110
44 81 124
756
Total
1 79 31 110
1 44 81 124
1 756
Assumed a worst�ast of I employee per 5000 square feet.
TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRIP ASSIGNMENT
The distribution of trips, shown in Figure 6, was based upon local travel patterns
for the roadway network surrounding the proposed I-81 Distribution Center site. Figure 7
shows the respective development -generated AM/PM peak hour trips and ADT
assignments.
2010 BUILD -OUT CONDITIONS
The I-81 Distribution Center assigned trips (Figure 7) were added to the 2010
background traffic volumes (Figure 4) to obtain 2010 build -out conditions. Figure 8
shows the 2010 build -out ADT and AM/PM peak hour traffic volumes at key locations
within the study area. Figure 9 shows the respective 2010 build -out lane geometry and
AM/PM peak hour levels of service. All HCS+ levels of service worksheets are included
in the Appendix section of this report.
A Traffic Impact Analvsis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
PHR+A Project Number: 14596-1 r1, 20 6
December 1, 2006
Page 8
40%
10%
No Scale
Rest Chnmh Road
_ Site
Drive � 1'
SITE
_ Site
Dn�e
#2
11
Ho ewe] Road
Brucetown Road
40% 10%
TP TPS A
Figure 6 Trip Distribution Percentages
PHR1�
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Pa -e 9
Figure 7 Development -Generated Trip Assignments
PH"
A Trak Impact Analysis of the Distribution Center
Project
ect Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Page 10
4
fi
n
„<v O
No Scale
o
M
.,,.
(26)48 ~
Resp �
Chump
a
Road
E.
ti
0
0
*%..12(32)
(-1�� 6(16)
7)32
Site
Drive # 1
a
N
SITE
u
h 1
Site Drive#2
(57)22
(I2)5�
0
O
11
ftm** 6(16)
Ho W
Me"
�,. R=dlie
�► 43
taco
4
o
Brucetown Roa
*'` 6(16)
b
b
Br�cet°wn
Rodd
(9)-16_,,
r
11 AM Peak Hour(PM Peak Hour)
LP .T.P+A
Figure 7 Development -Generated Trip Assignments
PH"
A Trak Impact Analysis of the Distribution Center
Project
ect Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Page 10
PHRn
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the I-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
December 1, 2006
Page 11
Bruceto
wn Road
Unsignalized \
Intersection
tceto���
x n'n Roa �FfF)�:
CFjF�0. U�
m
' AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
* Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
Denotes two-way left turn lane
Figure 9 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
RAPH
December 1, 2006
Page 12
w
ti
Signalized 4��
Intersection
Signalized
Intersection
o
O
LOS—B(B) !� O
OS B B)
Z
13 (�)
No Scale(q)9
BSB)
11
*ft.;
�l
1►
CB)$=
11
�
�► ��4��
Right in / Right out
c
0�{
G
O
SITE
(R)C�
Rest Chprch
l
Road
Site
Bruceto
wn Road
Unsignalized \
Intersection
tceto���
x n'n Roa �FfF)�:
CFjF�0. U�
m
' AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
* Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
Denotes two-way left turn lane
Figure 9 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
RAPH
December 1, 2006
Page 12
Signalized "New Intersection"
Intersection EB - 1 Left
11
LOS=C(C) WB - I Thru
Fourth Leg
*W)C
Unsignalized
Intersection
11
V
�% .®
�l
�1 C(C)
% r
u` I
Site
Drive #/ 1
fC )C �dt
SITE
R
Site
G Unsignalized
Drive # 2
O Intersection
*1116
Q�
Signalized "Suggested
Improvements"
Intersection Signalization
LOS=B(B) tntersectionAlignment
EB - I Left + 1 Right
O
WB - I Right
NB - 1 Right
SB - I Right
Bruceto
wn Road
Unsignalized \
Intersection
tceto���
x n'n Roa �FfF)�:
CFjF�0. U�
m
' AM Peak Hour (PM Peak Hour)
* Denotes Unsignalized Critical Movement
Denotes two-way left turn lane
Figure 9 2010 Build -out Lane Geometry and Levels of Service
A Traffic Impact Analysis of the 1-81 Distribution Center
Project Number: 14596-1-0
RAPH
December 1, 2006
Page 12
CONCLUSION
The traffic impacts associated with the proposed I-81 Distribution Center are
acceptable and manageable. Assuming suggested improvements, all intersections will
maintain overall levels of service to "C" or better during 2010 background and build -out
conditions, respectively. The following describes the recommended roadway
improvements for each of the study area intersections:
• Route 11 / Hopewell RoadBrucetown Road: Alignment of the intersection, traffic
signalization, one (1) eastbound left -turn and one (1) eastbound right turn lane, one
(1) northbound right turn lane, one (1) westbound right turn lane and one (1)
southbound right turn lane will be required to maintain acceptable levels of service
during 2010 background and build -out conditions.
Route 11 / Rest Church Road: Along with the additional westbound leg, this
intersection would require traffic signalization, one (1) eastbound thru lane and an
additional eastbound left turn lane, one (1) northbound right turn lane and one (1)
southbound left turn, lane to maintain acceptable levels of service during 2010
background and build -out conditions.
A Traffic Impact Analt sis of the Distribution Censer
Project
ect Number: 14596-1-0
R+A
December 1, 2006
PHPage 13
E. Sewage Conveyance and Water Supply
The I-81 Distribution Center site exists within the designated SWSA of Frederick
County. (See Figure 5).
A newly constructed 6 -inch sanitary forcemain has been installed along the easterly
side of Route 11. An on-site sanitary pumping station will be constructed for direct
connection to the forcemain. There are no known limiting factors for the conveyance
of sewage and sewage treatment from this property. Capacity and daily usage will be
addressed at the time of site plan submission.
Potable water and fire protection will be supplied via the 12 -inch water line located
along the easterly side of Route 11.
The impact of the additional use created by this rezoning is acceptable and
manageable. Figure 6 shows the locations of utility infrastructure planned in this
phase of development.
If I - "tmD- I
------
------
------
- -
- -
- - - - - - -
--
1-81 (R/W VARIES)
v�RG�N�P oR�N
-
- -
m--
—— —
— — — — 25'SETBACK
�..
N�1
`
IL'VI ►fir
tj tj OD
DU MPSTER
� iPAD
�.. � .. �..
S
m
'A d
TRAILER PARKING
(12k55'TYP.)
DUMPSTER '
W/PAD
1
Z
/
Z
(yfl 2
I
200' TRUCK COURT
op
M
z
/
A Z
a
I N:
I
o
• �
�
.��W
I
I
00 WAREHOUSE
11.0S.F.
71,000 S.F. OFFICE SPACE
e1
L
L
65 SPACES WAREHOUSE
44 SPACES OFFICE SPACE
PROVIDED= 11 9SPACES
A
cy
PRO ED WATER
NE
2
PROPOSE PUMP
STATION
0
IS
Q'
200'TRUCK COURT
1 n
'hco�z
I
o
�
o
(m
1 I
TRAILER PARKING
zxss TVP.)
J
a
W
I •
�' • 75' SE(RACK
O
O
y
s
SANSER
,!-S:
_— --
— — — —
n
Z
— — ,—E
sj
C3,
S + RT. 11
U •
p
p
W FORCE MAIN
12° WATER.11
STORMWATER
I
V
MANAGEMENT POND
If I - "tmD- I
F. Site Drainage
Figure 7 shows the natural drainage pattern that exists on this site. The lack of
concentration of the drainage allows the designer to utilize low impact type
stormwater management techniques. Design criteria will protect the natural swale
areas to the maximum extent possible. Disturbance will be primarily by right angle
road or driveway crossings. Adequate channel, inlet, and culvert calculations will be
provided during the design phase of the project to ensure direct runoff is contained
within the channel and post development velocities protect the existing ditches along
Route 11.
I
111..
f 11
di
rvF�6.
` y.
RAO
2"Olt
f,22
#/Oo
y i
IL
IDISTRIBUTION CENTER TAS
DUE DILIGENCE
GENCE REPORT-CL
EARBRDDK Drawn b Date,07/19/06 Job No.07-06-0072 Kate
r FREDERICK COUNTY VIRGINIA y Nunben
TRIAD ENGINEERING, M DDH Cadd file no.t
WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA SITE DRAINAGE LAYOUT Checked by SITEDRAINAGE.DWG Scateil'=500' FIGURE 7
G. Solid Waste Disposal Facilities
Approximate designated dumpster locations are shown on Figure 8. During the
design process, appropriately screened dumpster locations will be determined.
Contractual arrangements will be made with a Waste Management Service to
properly dispose of the solid waste. The following table provides an estimate of
increase in tonnage presented by this project at build -out.
I-81 Distribution Center Rezoning
Solid Waste Generation Summary
Frederick County, Virginia
Unit Type Amount Unit Unit Value Total
Quant it #/S Ft
Warehouse 739,000 Sq Ft 0.01 7,390
Office 11,000 Sq Ft 0.05 550
Total Waste (#'s)/day = 7,940
Estimated Solid Waste = 3.97 (tons)/day
H. Historic Sites and Structures
A search for historical structures on the subject property was conducted through the
Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR). A maps only archives search
utilizing the DHR cultural inventory for archaeological sites and architectural
structures revealed one potential historical structure, identified as File No. 034-0926
(Nathaniel Branson House), on the subject site. Subsequently, a case file search was
performed on this structure to indicate whether the resource is listed on the registers,
or has been evaluated for possible inclusion on the registers. Investigation of the case
files indicated the structure should not be investigated for possible register potential.
I. Impact on Community Facilities
The Frederick County Development Impact Model (DIM) has not been run for this
project as per E-mail with Ms. Susan Eddy on October 27, 2006.
Proffers have been offered which will mitigate the effects of impacts on the county.
Monetary contributions for fire and rescue are included in the Proffer Statement.
IV
FREDERICK COUNTY
IMPACT MODEL
v
PROFFER STATEMENT
PROPOSED PROFFER STATEMENT
REZONING: RZ# RA to M-1
PROPERTY: ±59 Acres
Tax Map Parcel No.'s 33-A-110; 33-A-109
RECORD OWNER: Estate of Roy Riley Boyce, Jr.
APPLICANT: BPG Properties, Ltd.
PROJECT NAME: 1-81 Distribution Center
PROFFER DATE:
REVISION DATA:
The undersigned hereby proffers that the use and development of the subject property
("Property"), as described above, shall be in strict conformance with the following conditions,
which shall supersede all other proffers that may have been made prior hereto. In the event that
the above referenced rezoning is not granted as applied for by the applicant ("Applicant"), these
proffers shall be deemed withdrawn and shall be null and void. Further, these proffers are
contingent upon final rezoning of the Property with "final rezoning" defined as that rezoning
which is in effect on the day following the last day upon which the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors (the "Board") decision granting the rezoning may be contested in the appropriate
court. If the Board's decision is contested, and the Applicant elects not to submit development
plans until such contest is resolved, the term final rezoning shall include the day following entry
of a final court order affirming the decision of the Board which has not been appealed, or, if
appealed, the day following which the decision has been affirmed on appeal. If this application is
denied by the Board, but in the event that an appeal is for any reason thereafter remanded to the
Board for reconsideration by a court of competent jurisdiction, then these proffers shall be
deemed withdrawn unless the Applicant shall affirmatively readopt all or any portion hereof in a
writing specifically for that purpose.
The headings of the proffers set forth below have been prepared for convenience or
reference only and shall not control or affect the meaning or be taken as an interpretation of any
provision of the proffers. The term "Applicant" as referenced herein shall include within its
meaning all future owners and successors in interest. When used in these proffers, the
"Conceptual Plan," shall refer to the plan entitled "Site Development, BPG Warehouse" dated
October 24, 2006 (Exhibit A).
The Applicant hereby Proffers the following:
1. Fire and Rescue
The Applicant shall contribute the sum of Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00) to the
Clearbrook Fire and Rescue Squad, at the time of issuance of a building pen -nit for the Property.
2. Traffic
2.1 The Applicant shall install a right -turn lane and right -in entrance, and right -turn -
only exit at the northernmost access road to the Property. At the southernmost access road to the
Property, the Applicant will provide a right -turn lane into the Property, and a right- and left -turn
exit from the Property.
2.2 The Applicant will contribute Twenty-five Thousand Dollars ($25,000.00) for
signalization improvements/realignment of the intersection of Brucetown/Hopewell Road and
Route 11 upon issuance of a building permit for construction of the new facility.
2.3 Subsequent to the approval of a site plan for the initial X750,000 square foot
facility (plus ancillary uses) on this Property and before the submission of a site plan for any
subsequent project on this Property, the Applicant will prepare and submit a Traffic Impact
Analysis ("Subsequent TIA") for any subsequent projects. The Applicant will meet with VDOT
to reach an agreement on all road improvements adjacent to the Property, which are
recommended and made apparent by the Subsequent TIA. Notwithstanding the same, and in any
event, if the Subsequent TIA results in projection of an additional 200 average daily truck trips
being generated by said subsequent project, then the Applicant will contribute an additional Ten
Thousand Dollars for signalization improvements/realignment of the intersection of
Brucetown/Hopewell Road and Route 11. Said payment shall be made upon the issuance of a
building permit for the construction of the subsequent development.
3. Landscape
3.1 The Applicant shall provide a ten (10) foot wide landscape strip adjacent to Route
11, comprised of three (3) street trees (per Zoning Ordinance 165-36.B.1, or equivalent) per one
hundred (100) linear feet, and twenty-five (25) shrubs per one hundred (100) linear feet.
3.2 The Applicant shall provide a seventy-five (75) foot inactive buffer and twenty-
five (25) foot active buffer adjacent to RA zoned properties primarily used for residential use and
which are identified for residential use in the comprehensive plan in effect at the time of this
rezoning.
4. Architectural
4.1 Facade materials of buildings facing Route 11 and Interstate 81 shall be primarily
of either concrete masonry unit, brick, architectural block, Dryvit or other simulated stucco, or
real or simulated wood or glass.
5. Site
5.1 All utilities will be underground.
5.2 Stormwater management facilities will be maintained by the Applicant.
6. Historical
6.1 Applicant has identified one potentially historical structure on the Property. As
part of its due diligence, the Applicant has sought the aid and guidance of The Department of
Historic Resources, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission concerning this structure. The
Department of Historic Resources, Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission surveyed the
existing structure (File No. 34-926) and determined that the structure did not have historic
register potential. The Applicant has determined that this finding is due in large part to the fact
that this structure has been modified significantly in modern times so as to make the older
portions of the structure unrecognizable and now consumed within the series of additions. The
Applicant understands that as part of the review of this rezoning that the Frederick County
Historic Resources Advisory Board ("HRAB") will review this site and the Applicant is
confident that HRAB will agree with the findings of the Department of Historic Resources,
Virginia Historic Landmarks Commission's findings.
Robin Lynne Hull, Co -Trustee
Kay Marie Morrison, Co -Trustee
BPG PROPERTIES, LTD.
By:
Its:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE
COUNTY/CITY, To -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2006, by Robin Lynne Hull.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE
COUNTY/CITY, To -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ,
2006, by Kay Marie Morrison.
NOTARY PUBLIC
My commission expires:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, AT LARGE
COUNTYXITY, To -wit:
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this
2006, by
My commission expires:
day of ,
of BPG Properties, Ltd.
NOTARY PUBLIC
1-81 (R/W
VARIES)
14
y
m
m
rn
MA
r
OUMPSTER
— —�
• . , 25'SE KRTRAILER
.._D
_
O
PARKING
(12k55'TYP.)
'
Rm W/PAD
mZ
�
I
2W TRUCK COURT
I
-0y
rri
�
1Z
Gy..'_'CfmZ
739,000 S.F. WAREHOUSE
11,000 SY OFFICE SPACE
65SPACESPACESSWAREHOUSE
�FF
44 SPACE
P11d ROVDEDH9 SPACES
I
iIII
Q- =
IT
a
I v
,
PtJ
1 Q'
dQ
rn
�
C
I
20D'TRUCK COURT
1
3
� O
ro
C
v
z
\
QWj ITI � I
TRAILERPARKING
I o 0
1 r
Z
I
(MK5F TYR.)
C
P
75'SE78ACK ..
.. �...
.. O
...� .. ��
O001
--_--'�-_-
--
-- - --
-- --
U.S. RT. 11 (80' WIDE)
N
D
=
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENTPOND
��
rli�
t I t
1
t t
t
t �
I
I
t I L_
an!?wnn s/
_
flu
1 .._ ...� -
ane �nilatrtv► s� -• .. — - — . • _
.. _..... I
t
I
t
I
I
D
i-81 DISTRIBUTION CENTER
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
GIN RING, ING.
we M by
640-m-sm w -w��eo OW nb yea gEmmmm
g�
OFFICE
GENERALIZED
LOCA TIO NS
WINCHESTER 8 PURCELLVILI.E, VIRGINIA Aaan Re]eot no:07-05-Op7g
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ST. ALBANS, 8 SBURG, ENNS WEST VIRGINIA m�wo
GREENSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA
HAGERSTOWN, MARYLAND C7�etAeW M Soda �,
rli�
VI
AGENCY COMMENT SHEETS
Rezoning Comments
Historic Resources Advisory Board
Mail to: Hand deliver to:
Frederick County Frederick County
Department of Planning & Development Department of Planning & Development
107 North Kent Street 107 North Kent Street
Winchester, Virginia 22601 Winchester, Virginia
(540) 665-5651
Applicant: Please fill out the information as accurately as possible in order to assist the
Historic Resources Advisory Board with their review. Attach a copy of your application form;
location map, proffer statement, impact analysis, and any other pertinent information.
Applicant's Name: BPG Properties, Ltd. Telephone: (215) 575-2436
Mailing Address: CIO Triad Engineering, Inc.
200 Aviation Drive
Winchester, VA 22602
Location of property: Approximate) 0.61 +/- miles north of the Route 11 intersection
with state route 671 (Cedar Hill). Bounded on the west by
Interstate Route 81 and on the east by Route 11 (Martinsburg Pike).
Current zoning: RA Zoning requested: M-1 Light Ind. Acreage: 59.0770+/-
Advisory.Board Comments:
Signature & Date:
Notice to Advisory Board - Please Return Form to Applicant
Rezoning Comments
19
VII
SURVEY PLAT & DEED
P.O. Box 2397-
Winchester, VA 226041
Phone 540-667-9300
FAX 540-667-2260 L LP
August 14, 2006
DESCRIPTION OF
THE PROPERTY OF
ROBIN HULL AND KAY MARIE MORRISON
TAX MAP NO. 33 ((A)) PARCEL 109
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Beginning at the southeastern corner of the tract herein described said point being
an iron rod set on the westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 and a corner to the other
lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison.
Thence departing said westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 and running with
said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison the following courses and distances:
N74° -57'-06"W, 97.47 feet to an iron rod set,
N65° -27'-06"W, 382.80 feet to an iron rod set,
N280 -12'-06"W, 986.69 feet to an iron rod set,
said rod being on the easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 and bearing N28"-
12' -06"W, 2,164.80 feet to a set stone found.
Thence departing said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison and
running with said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 N19° -55'-51"E, 240.94
feet to a iron pipe found, said pipe being a corner to Donald S. Cline.
Thence departing said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 and running
with said Donald S. Cline S68° -47'-47"E, 754.71 feet to a iron pipe found and S77° -04'-
47"E, 372.62 to a iron rod set, said rod being on the aforementioned westerly right-of-way
line of US Route 11.
Thence departing said Donald S. Cline and running with said westerly right-of-way
line of US Route 11 701.03 feet along the arc of a curve to the right said curve having a
radius of 5,690.00 feet a central angle of 07°-03'-33" and a chord which bears S13° -38'-
12"W, 700.59 feet to a VHC concrete monument found and S17" -09'-58"W 254.63 feet,
to the point of beginning and containing 18.9306 acres more or less. This description is
subject, however, to all easements, rights-of-way, and restrictions of record.
Triad Engineering, Inc.
Morgantown o St. Albans Greensburg Hagerstown Winchester 4 Purcellvifle
West Virginia Pennsylvania Maryland Virginia
P.O. Box 2397
Winchester, VA 22604
Phone 540-667-9300
FAX 540-667-2260 _
August 14, 2006
DESCRIPTION OF
THE PROPERTY OF
ROBIN HULL AND KAY MARIE MORRISON
TAX MAP NO. 33 ((A)) PARCEL 110
STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
Beginning at the southeastern corner of the tract herein described said point being
an iron rod set on the westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 and a corner to Donald
Lee Bragg.
Thence departing said westerly right-of-way line of U.S. Route 11 and running with
said Donald Lee Bragg N700 -36'-48"W, 515.84 feet to a fence post and S180 -31'-55"W,
142.22 feet to a fence post, said fence post being a corner to Charles W. and Joline S.
Orndoff.
Thence departing said . Donald Lee Bragg and running with said Charles W. and
Joline S. Orndoff N670 -35'-13"W, 748.75 feet to a iron rod set, said rod being on the
easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81.
Thence departing said Charles W. and Joline S. Orndoff and running with said
easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 N19" -55'-51"E, 1,916.03 feet to an iron rod
set, said rod being a corner to the other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison and
bearing N28° -12'-06"W, 2,164.80 feet to a set stone found.
Thence departing said easterly right-of-way line of Interstate Route 81 and running
with said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison the following courses and
distances:
S280 -12'-06"E, 986.69 feet to an iron rod set,
S650 -27'-06"E, 382.80 feet to an iron rod set,
S74c'-57'-06E, 97.47 feet to an said rod being on the aforementioned w'resterly right-of-way 'line rod set,
of US Route 11.
Thence departing said other lands of Robin Hull and Kay Marie Morrison and
running with said westerly right-of-way line of US Route 11 S17° -09'-58"W, 836.27 feet to
an iron rod set and 285.15 feet along the arc of a curve to the right said curve having a
radius of 5,690.00 feet a central angle of 020-52'-17" and a chord which bears S18° -36' -
Triad Engineering, Inc.
Morgantown - St. Albans Greensburg
West Virginia Hagerstown Winchester - Purcellville
9 Pennsylvania Maryland Virginia
Pa ge 2
07"W, 285.12 feet to the point of beginning and containing 40.1464 acres more or less.
This description is subject, however, to all easements, rights-of-way, and restrictions of
record.