Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07-12 BZA Staff Report VARIANCE APPLICATION #07-12 J. H. YOST, III Staff Report for the Board of Zoning Appeals Prepared: August 6, 2012 Staff Contact: Dana M. Johnston, Zoning Inspector ______________________________________________________________________________ This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board of Zoning Appeals to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING DATE: August 21, 2012 – Pending LOCATION : Enon Springs Subdivision (Route 608) on Aster Trail, Lot 13. MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT : Back Creek PROPERTY ID NUMBER : 69A-1-30-13 PROPERTY ZONING & USE Land Use: Residential : Zoned: RA ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE : North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential East: RA (Rural Areas Use: Residential West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a 26 foot right side variance, and a 26 foot left side variance, resulting in a 24 foot setback on both sides, for a single family house. REASON FOR VARIANCE: With current setbacks, and how narrow the property is, there is no buildable area to construct a dwelling. Variance #07-12 – J. H. Yost, III August 6, 2012 Page 2 STAFF COMMENTS: Frederick County adopted zoning in 1967. The Frederick County historical zoning map shows this property was zoned A-2 (Agricultural General) in 1967. The property setback lines at the adoption of the zoning ordinance were 35 feet for the front and 15 feet for the side yards. Frederick County amended its Ordinance in 1989 and 2009 to change the A-2 zoning districts to the current RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District, making the current setbacks for the property 60 feet to the front, 60 feet to the rear, 50 feet to the right, and 50 feet to the left. Based on the small size of this property and the large setbacks associated with the RA zoning district, the applicant is requesting a 26 foot right side yard and a 26 foot left side yard variance. The applicant feels it is appropriate to meet the front and rear setbacks, which are 60 feet for the front and 50 feet in the rear. Based on the plat provided by Michael Artz, the dwelling is 52’x30’ in size and will be constructed over the rear building restriction line. Upon issuance of the building permit, staff will require setback surveys for insurance that the dwelling will not be constructed any closer to approved setbacks and will not be built over the building restriction line in the rear. The applicant is seeking this variance in order to construct a single-family dwelling. Therefore, this application for a variance must meet the requirements as set forth by The Code of Virginia 1950 as amended 15.2-2309(2), and Section 165-1001.02 (C) of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance. This variance, if granted, would result in a 24 foot right and left side yard setback. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE AUGUST 21, 2012 MEETING: The Code of Virginia 15.2-2309 (2), states that no variance shall be granted unless the application can meet the following requirements: 1) The strict application of the Ordinance will produce an undue hardship. 2) The hardship is not generally shared by the properties in the same zoning district and vicinity. 3) That the authorization of such variance will not be a substantial detriment to the adjacent property and the character of the district will not be changed by the variance.