Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-13 BZA Staff Report VARIANCE APPLICATION #04-13 BRUCE JOHNSON & CYNTHIA STEINKAMP Staff Report for the Board of Zoning Appeals Prepared: September 3, 2013 Staff Contact: Mark Cheran, Zoning Administrator ______________________________________________________________________________ This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the Board of Zoning Appeals to assist them in making a decision on this request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING DATE: September 17, 2013 – Pending LOCATION: The subject property is located at the end of Cul-de-sac on Isaac Drive, southeast of Fletcher Drive, south of Northwestern Pike (U.S. Route 50). MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Gainesboro PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 26-2-21 PROPERTY ZONING & USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas) Land Use: Vacant ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & USE: North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Lake Isaac East: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential VARIANCE REQUESTED: The applicant is requesting a 15 foot right side yard variance, resulting in a 35 foot right side setback for a single family dwelling. REASON FOR VARIANCE: Frederick County adopted zoning in 1967. The Frederick County historical zoning map shows this property was zoned A-2 (Agricultural General) in 1967. The property setback lines at the adoption of the zoning ordinance were 35 feet for the fronts and 15 feet for the side yards. Frederick County amended its Ordinance in 1989 to change the A-2 (Agricultural General) District to the current RA (Rural Areas) District. The Frederick County Board of Variance #04-13 – Bruce Johnson & Cynthia Steinkamp September 3, 2013 Page 2 Supervisors amended the setbacks for the RA (Rural Areas) District on February 28, 2007, making the current setbacks for this property 60 feet to the front, 50 feet to the rear, and 50 feet to both sides. STAFF COMMENTS: The applicant has applied for a variance to construct a single-family dwelling. The property cannot meet the current setbacks associated with the RA (Rural Areas) District. The applicant is requesting a variance of 15 feet on the right side property line from the current 50 foot setback side requirement of the RA (Rural Areas) District. This variance, if granted, would result in a 35 foot right side yard setback. STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE SEPTEMBER 17, 2013 MEETING: The property cannot meet the current setbacks associated with the RA (Rural Areas) District. The applicant is requesting a variance of 15 feet on the right side property line from the current 50 foot setback side requirement of the RA (Rural Areas) District. This variance, if granted, would result in a 35 foot right side setback. The Code of Virginia 1950 as amended 15.2-2309(2) and Section 165-1001.2(C) of the Zoning Ordinance states that no variance shall be granted unless the application can meet the following requirements: The strict application of the Ordinance will produce an undue hardship, the hardship is not generally shared by the properties in the same zoning district and vicinity, that the authorization of such variance will not be a substantial detriment to adjacent property, and the character of the district will not be changed by the variance. It appears that this variance meets the intent of the Code of Virginia, Section 15.2-2309 (2). This request from the current setbacks of the RA (Rural Areas) District may be justified.