Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout09-08 Comments (2)COUNTY of FREDERICK John r�. Riley, r County Administrator 544/665-5666 Fax 540/667-0370 E-mail: jrileyC co.frederick.va.us I, Jay E. Tibbs, Deputy Clerk to the Frederick County Board of Supervisor, do hereby certify that the attached is a true and exact copy of the Board of Supervisors' minutes of February 25, 2009 regarding CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #09-08 FOR SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY, FOR A COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1203 REDBUD ROAD (ROUTE 661), AND IS IDENTIFIED WITH PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 55 -A -129A IN THE STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT.. Given under my hand this 12Th day of March, 2009. J y YTibbs, Deputy Clerk 107 North Kent Street o Winchester, Virginia 22601 Richard C. Shickle Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Gary W. Dove Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Philip A. Lemieux Aye Gary A. Lofton Aye Information Only 1. The Finance Director provides a fund balance report. See attached, p. 6. 2. The Registrar provides notification of a possible June 2009 primary election. See attached, p. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #09-08 FOR SHENANDOAH MOBILE COMPANY, FOR A COMMERCIAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY. THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT 1203 REDBUD ROAD (ROUTE 661), AND IS IDENTIFIED WITH PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 55 -A -129A IN THE STONEWALL MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT. - DENIED Zoning Administrator Mark Cheran appeared before the Board regarding this item. He advised this item was continued from the November 12, 2008 meeting. The property is located at 1203 Redbud Road (Route 661) in the Stonewall Magisterial District and is zoned RA (Rural Areas) District. This is an application %or a 195 -foot Commercial Telecommunications Facility. The site is located outside of the Urban Development Area, but is within the boundaries of the Northeast Land Use Plan. The Planning Commission recommended approval with the following conditions: 1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times. 2. The tower shall be available for collocating personal wireless service providers. 3. A minor site plan shall be approved by Frederick County. 4. The tower shall be removed by the applicant or property owner within 12 months of 15 abandonment of operation. 5. In the event a telecommunications tower is not erected within 12 months of the approval of this conditional use permit (CUP), the CUP will be deemed invalid. 6. A certified Virginia engineer shall provide verification that the tower is designed and will be constructed in a manner that, should the tower collapse for any reason, the collapsed tower will be contained in an area around the tower, with a radius equal to or lesser than the setback, measured from the center line of the base of the tower. Chairman Shickle advised the Board that he had spoken to the applicant prior to the meeting regarding his presentation. He then cited section 5.4 of the Board's Rules of Procedure which govern applicant presentations. Lynn Rice, Shenandoah Mobile Company, appeared before the Board on behalf of the applicant. He began by reviewing a map of the proposed site. He then noted the State said the application had no adverse effects on historic properties in the area. He reviewed the correspondence history between the applicant and the State. Mr. Rice cited the need and benefits of the project. He stated this proposal would fix coverage and capacity issues in the area. The proposed tower would hold a minimum of three wireless service providers. He believed the site was consistent with the 2007 Comprehensive Plan. Supervisor Lofton stated he would like some assurance the site would be surrounded by trees for the life of the pole. Mr. Rice responded "tell me what you want around the pole for screening". Supervisor Lofton stated he wanted assurance of some type of screening, such as living green trees. Mr. Rice stated if the screening was made part of the conditional use permit then the applicant would add additional trees. Supervisor Lofton stated he would like the applicant to work with a forester to see that 16 the site is screened in perpetuity. Chairman Shickle convened the public hearing, Bill Meier, Stonewall District, advised he was building a house next door to the proposed site. He went on to say that he had been before the Board previously regarding this item. He then cited various sections of the Code of Virginia pertaining to Agricultural and Forestal District. He believed numerous laws were being violated. He went on to say the purpose of these districts was to preserve forest land, not tear it down. He stated the antenna does not belong in the district and he felt it should be located at Millbrook High School. He concluded by saying he felt some of the board members had a conflict of interest in this matter. David Gregg, Stonewall District and property owner, stated his main concern in pursuing this application was to get Internet service for his wife's business and he has been assured by the company this would not be a problem. He went on to say he has his property in a forestal plan and he has no interest in selling it during his lifetime. He stated he had no plans to destroy the woods. Mr. Gregg advised there was a precedent for cell towers in agricultural districts. Bernie Schwartzman, Stonewall District, spoke in favor of the proposed cell tower. He said there was no cable or DSL Internet service in the area. He concluded by saying it was important for everyone to have good cell phone service in order to contact emergency services. Wayne Seipel, Stonewall District, stated there was a very cohesive neighborhood along Red Bud Road and they were looking for something better than dial up Internet. He went on to say if he could be assured this proposal would provide a better connection then he would be 100% for it. He went on to say this was needed in the area, but he thought the area behind Millbrook High School would be the ideal place. Beth Stern, Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation, acknowledged they did receive 17 Shentel's letter and they have been going through the identified resources. She went on to say they were beginning to enter the consultation process. She concluded by saying she was available to provide comments and information. Chairman Shickle closed the public hearing. Supervisor Fisher asked about the sites at Millbrook High School. Mr. Rice advised they did look at that, but they were further south than the proposed site. Chairman Shickle asked about the setback for the tower. Zoning Administrator Cheran responded that the setback was the height of the tower. Supervisor DeHaven stated he appreciated the hard work everyone put in on this proposal. He stated he saw many resources in the corridor, which were being impacted, this proposal was outside of the growth boundaries, and it violated the Northeast Land Use Plan. He noted the Historic Resources Advisory Board recommended this application be denied. Upon a motion by Supervisor DeHaven, seconded by Supervisor Lemieux, the Board approved the Resolution Denying Conditional Use Permit Application Number 09-08 of Shenandoah Mobile Company for a Telecommunications Tower Facility on Property Located at 1203 Redbud Road, Tax Parcel Number 55 -A -129A, in the Stonewall Magisterial District. WHEREAS, on July 16, 2008, Shenandoah Mobile Company submitted Conditional Use Permit Application Number 09-08, requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), pursuant to Frederick County Code § 165-48.6, for a telecommunications tower facility, of 195 feet in height, on property located at 1203 Redbud Road, Tax Parcel Number 55- A -129A (Property), in the Stonewall Magisterial District; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit on October 15, 2008; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors held a public hearing on this Conditional Use Permit on November 12, 2008 and continued the public hearing on February 25, 2009; 18 WHEREAS, the Property, and all properties adjacent to the Property, are in the Rural Areas (RA) Zoning District and are currently used for low-density residential purposes or are vacant; WHEREAS, the Board of Supervisors finds the requested use of the Property for a telecommunications tower facility is not in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, for the following reasons: ® The proposed site of the requested use is located outside the County's Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and Urban Development Area (UDA), both of which being areas that the County intends for more intensive forms of development, and therefore the proposed site is subject to protection from such industrial, commercial, and residential development; • The proposed site of the requested use is located within the area encompassed by the Northeast Land Use Plan (NELUP) component of the Comprehensive Plan and the NELUP encourages the preservation and protection of significant historic resources, environmentally -sensitive areas, and open space areas within the area it encompasses; • The NELUP identifies Developmentally Sensitive Areas (DSAs) located proximate to the property, such areas being designated to ensure that their historic resources, areas of steep slopes and mature woodlands, existing residential clusters, and public land uses are protected from future development; • The proposed site of the requested use is located proximate to the historical sites of the Third Battle of Winchester, Hackwood, and Milburn; • The NELUP further provides to ensure that the Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB) reviews all development proposals which impact identified DSAs, the HRAB has reviewed the requested use, and the HRAB concluded that the benefits of the requested use, in terms of additional mobile telephone coverage levels as shown in the applicant's coverage map, do not warrant the impact of a telecommunications tower facility on the area's viewshed; • The Virginia Department of Transportation has indicated that the requested use will require the construction of a commercial entrance; and • The requested use would change the character of the area within which it would be located, as the requested use would be inconsistent with rural and historical character of the area, would blight the viewshed of the area, would require a transportation facility incompatible with the area, would not be in keeping with the protection of environmental resources of the area, and have an overall negative impact on the area; 19 WHEREAS, the proposed site of the requested use is located proximate to Redbud Road (Route 661), a designated Virginia Byway, which designation takes into consideration the scenic landscape, historic Civil War battlefields, and environmentally significant nature of the area, and the requested use would be inconsistent with those characteristics; WHEREAS, the proposed site of the requested use is located proximate to the proposed Redbud Trail Greenway, which is intended to emphasize the natural environmental features of the area, with which the requested use would be inconsistent; WHEREAS, the County has traditionally had a higher expectation for land use actions in rural areas, scenic areas, along byways, and proximate to DSAS, so that scenic areas and properties of significant historic values are not negatively impacted, and the requested use does not satisfy that expectation; and WHEREAS, the applicant has not presented sufficient evidence of its efforts to locate or co -locate at a different location or of its need to locate at the Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Frederick County Board of Supervisors denies approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), pursuant to Frederick County Code § 165-48.6, for a telecommunications tower facility, of 195 feet in height, on property located at 1203 Redbud Road, Tax Parcel Number 55 -A -129A (Property), in the Stonewall Magisterial District. Passed this 25th day of February, 2009 Supervisor Lofton stated citizens needed cell coverage and the technology would advance. He understood the concerns about the site, was supportive of the proposal if it enhanced the community. The above motion was approved by the following recorded vote: Richard C. Shickle Aye Charles S. DeHaven, Jr. Aye Gary W. Dove Aye Bill M. Ewing Aye Gene E. Fisher Aye Philip A. Lemieux Aye Gary A. Lofton Nay STEPHENS CITY JOINT LAND USE PLAN — AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2007 COMPREHENSIVE POLICY PLAN CHAPTER 6, LAND USE, TO UPDATE THE STEPHENS CITY JOINT LAND USE PLAN. THE UPDATE PROVIDES A NEW ORIENTATION TO THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF THE PLAN, 20 02/23/2009 10:19 8043672391 DEPT OF HISTORIC RES L. Pm9um Bryant h, Department of Historic Resources Secretary ofiNorvral Rcnaurm 2$0lnlsington Avenue, Richmond, Virginia 23221-0311 February 23, 2009 Mr, William J. Mikalik Triad Engineering, Inc. 200 Aviation Drive Winchester, VA 22602 Rc_ Proposed 199 -foot Monopole (Red Bud), 1203 Redbud Road, Winchester Pr—edcrick County, Virginia DHR File # 2008-0851 Bear Mr. Mikalik- PAGE 02/02 Kathleen S. Kilpatrick Dlremir Tel: (804)367-2323 Fnx:(804)367-2391 TOO: (804) 367-2386 w W W.dhr.Virgiaia_gov Thank you for y tri request for review and coinmenr of the above referenced cellular telecommunications project, specifically in regard to any potential ef%ets this uneertakir+,g rrtight have upon the Third Winchester Battlefield (DHR Survey No. 034-0456). 1n May 2008, the consultant for the Shenandoah Mobile Company initiated consultation with the Departriaxnt of Historic Resources (DHR) pursuaat to Seciav r 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, and the existing, Programmatic A greement (PA) for the review of cell towers. On July i t, 2008, our office concluded consultation on this undertaking by concurring with the reconuncndation that the construction of the new monopole cell tower facility would have No Adverse E- cot upon historic properties listed in of eligible for tho National Register of Historic Places. However, the DHR later learned that the Third Winchester Battlefield, which is located within the one-half mile Arca of Potential Effect for the project, was not identified in the Form 620 consultation package, and the effects of the new tower were not evaluated by the consultant or our officc. Having reviewed the recently submitted additional materials pertaining to the battlefield, and having received confirmation that the Civil War Preserration Trust, the Shenandoah Valley Battlefield Foundation, and the American Battlefield Protection Program have not responded to notification of the proposed undertaking, we believe that the proposed undertaking will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, specifically the Third Winchester Battlefield (0340456). Should you receive any comments regarding the project's effects to historic properti,.s please fomud copies to the Depami nt of Historic Resources (D..HR). If you have any questions about our cotrnncnt,, please contact me at (804) 367-2323, Ext. 100. Sincerely, Christopher V. Novelli, Architectural historian Virginia Department of Historic Resources Adminiuratiye 5ervioer Capital Region Office 'ndewwkr RcRinn Office Roanoke Regian Ounce Northcm Rcgion QiFicc 10 CouEthmm Awnoe 2801 Kensinglon Avc. 14415 Old Courthawre way. 2"d Floor 1030 PenrMrAve., SE 5357 Main Strcet Petersburg VA 23903 Richmond. VA 23221 Newport Ntws, VA 23609 Roanoke, VA 24013 PO BOX 519 7b1; (804) 862-6416 Tet: (804) 367.2323 Tel: (757) 886-2807 Tel. (540) 857-7595 Stephens City, VA 22655 Fax: (604)962-6196 Fax: (804) 367-2391 Fax (757)986-2208 Fnx: (540) 957-7598 Td: (540)869-7029 Fax. (540) 969-7033 srrEn►rEL P.O. Box 459 • Edinburg, Virginia 22824-0459 (540) 984-4141 A N 9 2009 January 7, 2009 The Honorable Richard Shickle Chairman, Frederick County Board of Supervisors 107 North Kent Street, 2nd Floor Winchester, VA 22601 RE: Request for Extension — CUP 09-08 Shenandoah Mobile Company — Site 046 —Redbud Application for a Conditional Use Permit Dear Mr. Shickle: On November 18, 2008, Shenandoah Mobile Company ("Shentel") appeared before the Frederick County Board of Supervisors in support of its application for a conditional use permit for the construction of a 195 foot Commercial Telecommunications Facility. At the meeting, Shentel requested and was granted a 60 day extension due to a request for additional information that was received from the Virginia Department of Historic Resources (DHR). This additional information has been submitted to DHR by our consultant TRIAD Engineering, however, a response from DHR is not expected until later this month. To allow time to receive the response from DHR and to properly evaluate and address any additional findings that may be set forth, Shentel respectfully requests an extension for the hearing on its conditional use permit application and asks that this item be placed on the Agenda for the Board of Supervisors' February 25`h meeting. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Sincerely yours, Leonard L. Greisz Manager - Site Acquisition cc: Charles DeHaven, Supervisor Mark Cheran, Zoning & Subdivision Administrator James Johnson, Esquire LOCAL AND LONG DISTANCE TELEPHONE - INTERNET AND DAl"A SERVICES =- CABLE TELEVISION WIRELESS VOICE AND DATA SERVICES - ALARM (MONITORING TELECOMMUNICATIONS EOUIPMEN T WE MUST SERVE WELL TO PROSPER - WE MUST PROSPER TO SERVE WELL off, COMNIONWEAL,71-1 of VIRGINIA K Wsm s""L k Dn"p. 't -talent of Historic lResources Kan, S Ksx�il .... .. Richaiv.d_ Virginio, 1',2'.,'1-0311' Nv whri Al VMS; Fon7�k Awn w assC011WWAD ;css 1 elicolnnwwlications Bureau Re: ?ropoe,.cd Monopolc, .1,Rc.d Bwl), !20_3 Redbud bVuwhcmwl! redcrkk, cowvy-, viqinia DIAN Fk ­ 2,008-085-1 Cow MT. % Sordo: We are wrilif"E in rc;_icnce to th.,; opctncd 199 -ft morlk,, ', '- ­rl -,w ,­,Iions tryAef IRoj rijJ) i&cat,ad, at ;203 Redbud Koa& Q r-3 QK 1 "MY" VIA , Y * - DW ,-- , -'I . `t_� ! :, � I , SKemindoah k1olbile w fh n, n: wn. ; On, Smdon 106 of dic , .- . ' a. n W 4, , ,, i�,;crncsit (FA) for the. ro it. -NN of edlusy Coe V aucins :oocrs. On I i .1,J: w WiR cowh. W wn-0; "n on this undenakhqg by cumuNng Adve - FAI6�-I v,n- One that the A lo Jlity Nkould hive Ni�� rse- usm hStma p- " -0 hand W x VVAP - 1 1, V&S WWIZifical!�, dlc antic-q'mte(,,. flr:i a5mme CAW M x z %V W z aw ox, - "I' _ �'. ,w f,`'); - -i _1 ,% 4:'1 1 - - i' i , -oh, W r, 1 v 'aA , ;-%�:I (AH it chis undicrk-a DH R l 1 11 Q 7 A F.A". . j ..r ini UnfZrirunatcl.y.. tlhc, t snJefie!J, wxs, itt t in dle FWn WO n 0 A n r_qn. to die f rh­ tov.;er A,,, -m. not t,,aluaicA try,, the Cc - , T _, V t. J, ornision, vv c Wo v tat our eadkv, -_ „c at To, Th�to Q the Resp %d + nv' ,, 11 %c r - ". , v. , - a Sknmj -h 4wl i kompoy cows,0 i -y cf% P;� I bo, r IAN 1, .r Ha Haud""Jo c0fic4M, ;'Iia._- a':o lt6%tings A om WiR, W A JWT-1 Hisith, n arx,,�. Cornpliance 10 Coun houscAt. ell. 1c 144 i 5 Old GC orihow;c Wo. Z' 1, liQr ;0"0 pvtzna, pewrshurp. VN 230,10 Richinond, % N 212.21 NcaNc,,% e� VA 2 IN)g R0.111AC. \A -011 N.) ll % -^19 ct'Tvl, 173 +xri- Td r4o ) s 5 -. -+f 04 624 Fcl' St 4) 3,.,. A' I Fax: )Vis I we f X(Ai 3,67-2 "') 1 Fay.: i 7q -i 'f,:i '�p7 � a ' t '.ac �. .k `4 til. ..ni � �...� _ .. ._.. _ e' ' � � S a' . _ � �. ;® EXISTING COVERAGE 370 378 177 S 377 ..T� H m r 92 5 13 DO f.+►""� 0Snowden Bridge / �,. EMA Subdivision f 85 O R—M�f Pc7--- Crossing ` ti 46 X2'1 �� PR POSED Z 7'7 S I 74 Sp its Field,, 50 Mil b k HS / RNbud Run Elementary h 101% Hills — Hwy 7 gz 13� 1b1 z l So /^ M _ p lS3 r� L a N 52 67 6L JEND In -Building Coverage, -84 dBm NJ SITE 046 C UVERAGE 378 377 39 370 177 Hwy So �Oe 20 f •' ^ 0Snowden Bridge / 85 E M A Subdivision 0 R-moiM76--`M.` Crossing 46 X21, 3;Qp PR POSED 7'7 SI 74 0 Sp its Field\� 50 Milb k HS / R60bud Run Elementary h 101% Hills Hwy 7 '130 8 f 51` h SO Ln r� �r ' N 52� t67j mIn-Building Coverage, -84 dB PROPOSED 20 COVERAGE � Je A `. 378 •177. X2.1. 1 �. 377 77 Hwy 50 dtary �a1 3 Hwy 7 99 8G #7 92 51 611 `ASO 513 Ln NJ 52 f LEGEND � 22 � �// 4 In -Vehicle Coverage, -98 dBm 167 a 4 61 EXISTING 20 1 COVERAGE s 370 .r 'OpwY- wden Bridge dor a EN " S ivision 378 177 85 Rut rcT— Cr `sing 46 T ED 377 �} 77f� SI Hwy 50 2 Fiel , 50 74�_,wbobud Run Elementary m ! e� 5 S0 �- rLrlr N 52 - �� LEGEND In -Building Coverage, -84 dBm 167 In -Vehicle Coverage, -98 dBm 61 WINCHESTER SITES 37$ 377 20 Sites inside the circle Fare to the proposed site 046. Site 046' will provide relief in the MOU, Calls, & 370 f Drops currently being experienced by I these sites. ®Snowden Bridge / ' Subdivision FEMA 177 ' f $5 Rutherford Crossing j yy 46 2.1 AA PR POSED V2 7� SI HAY 50 7�`■r • c^ ;its Field�� MilbroiIk HS / Retlbud Run Elementary S�°� 1011 m cb Hills i ,S' � 130 � � � 7 ••`'"w°., R±1 j I '32 SO 3 nn' 52 V LEGEND 22 �� . Site 046 neighbor sites (5) ����� Rest of Winchester sites (14) ..!L," fester: Minutes of Uspg- Neighbor sites of Site 646 (blue sites in previous slide) have a significant share of the MOU, Call Drops and Call Blocks happening in and around Winchester City Minutes of usage, MOU The 5 neighbor sites of Site 046 currently support 1/3 of the total subscriber activity in Winchester City. Site 046 would provide relief by taking some of these calls VVIFichester: Blocks arse Ciro yy;I;.. e Call Blocks Call Drops M-. Proposed Site 046 is expected to improve call drop and call block statistics which are currently high in the 5 neighbor sites in relation to all the sites serving Winchester City. ty. Ur X -C "to' Frevco �7 4�,4' Fort Milroy % Walter, T rtb '31 ->�. Pine Rd All� Stephenson ' 2i' 'Rt eoo 3,00 rm Ft edetick Hills -0 actot r ri oV4ittCtt8 HeigNs 'F c col., , IINO� si Aq2 7 Gley k: 17 va AL ct LIr C-1 Ur X -C "to' �7 4�,4' Fort Milroy % T rtb '31 ->�. Pine Rd irrr ' 2i' 'Rt Shenandoah 9utra Ft edetick Hills -0 actot r ri oV4ittCtt8 HeigNs 'F V� si Aq2 Gley va AL LIr tz ad AA 17 - a AF Ur X -C "to' SiteAcquisiiun and Pirujed Deveiupnieni Consuftant for Shentel MEMO JUL 16 W Frederick County Planning and Development Attn: Mark Cheran; Zoning and Subdivision Administrator From: Lynn Koerner, Representing Shenandoah Mobile Company (Shentel) Date: July 15, 2008 RE: Condkkwu a Use Permit Appikmtlm - TelecommunkNations Facility Site 046 - Red Bud Please find attached the search ring form that was assigned for the area. Please note that the search area is an area within 1 mile of the search coordinates. Additionally, find attached a map that identifies the three candidates that were evaluated. Candidate A is in the vicinity of the proposed tower. Candidate B is by the sports field at the school and was proposed as a light pole replacement. Candidate C is a power pole which was proposed to be replaced. Both Candidates B and C were rejected by RF as not being able to meet the coverage objective. This was due both to location and the limited height that could be achieved. Within the assigned search area, no other service providers and commercial telecommunication facility infrastructure was identified and so no collocation was possible. A visual impact study was conducted on July 5, 2008 and is attached. During the study, the various roads surrounding the site were driven and due to terrain and tree cover, the balloon was not observed. Sin,,,;c-erel.v yours; Lynmer Site Acquisition and Project Development Consultant Search AK e inti Form r� State Huy 37 f 0 a° IWA06SH077F IVA,►OSi�#u SHENTEL PCS �x-..rte SITE 1 AME:: Redbud SITE ICI: WAIOSH046 Tyviifegvc Berry+ri le Pike _ — •, VVAOUH101 Sta%v %7 _ WA03SH130 Design Irt>xoraetatlon Latitude (NAD83): X39° 12' 08.96" N (39.20248) Longitude (NAD83): 78° 06' 46.06" W (-78.11279) Search Area Requirements Ground Elevation: 667 it AMSL Radiation Center: 150 it AGL Min Height (A -MSL): 600 It AMSL ERP (watts): 310 watts Antenna Type: APXV18-2065-16-C Max height (AMSL): 700 it AMSL Antenna Contig.: Sectored Antenna Orientation: 0°,120°,240° Structure Type: - Comments: Look for structure or land for structure with in 1 mile of search coordinates - Provide capacity and coverage in Northeast Winchester )Site will reouire F3 Lucent Modceil 4-0 B Street or Suburb Northeast Winchester 1-81, Hwv 7 and Redbud Rd Quad State Master Lease None Frederick MaYter Lease 2 �.>�aw� Site Objectives and Neighbors -84dBm In -building cc -98dBm Rural In -Vehicle 1 RF Engineer. DextF r Torculas _ or better ge or better Neighbor Lists to be included in subsequent releases of search area information forms. 1 ;- 1 Street Atlas USA•R• 2005 Data use subject to license. . ft ° 2004 DeLonne. Street Atlas USAF • 2005. _ www.delorme.com 0 400 800 1200 1600 2000 2400 2800 MN 00.0" Wj Data Zoom 13-5 Shentel Site 046 Data use subject to license � ©�— 2006 DeLorme. Topa USA® 6.0. ft vwwv.delorme.com MN (U).1" W) Data Zoom 14-4 Topo Map indicating locations of photos and views Site #2 Balloon - 195 feet - Center of Photo Sim #2 Tower Simulation - 195 feet - Center of Photo 4z 13