PC 11-01-17 Meeting Agenda AGENDA
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
The Board Room
Frederick County Administration Building
Winchester, Virginia
November 1, 2017
7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER TAB
1) Adoption of Agenda: Pursuant to established procedures, the Planning Commission
should adopt the Agenda for the meeting ................................................................ (no tab)
2) September 6, 2017 Meeting Minutes .............................................................................. (A)
3) Committee Reports .................................................................................................. (no tab)
4) Citizen Comments ................................................................................................... (no tab)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
5) Rezoning #04-17 for Carbaugh Business Center, submitted by Stowe Engineering, PLC,
to rezone two parcels of land that total 107.21+/- acres from the RA (Rural Areas) District to
the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. The site has an address of 831 Shady Elm
Road (Route 651) and is located on the eastern side of Shady Elm Road, approximately 1.11
miles southwest of the intersection of Shady Elm Road and Apple Valley Road (Route 652).
The eastern portion of the site is bounded by the CSX Railroad. The properties are
identified by Property Identification Numbers 74-A-68 and 74-A-69 and are located within
the Back Creek Magisterial District.
Mrs. Perkins ..................................................................................................................... (B)
6) Ordinance Amendment to the Frederick County Code – Chapter 165 Zoning
ARTICLE II SUPPLEMENTARY USE REGULATIONS; PARKING; BUFFERS;
AND REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES, Part 203 – Buffers and Landscaping
§165-203.02. Buffer and screening requirements. Revision to the Frederick County
Zoning Ordinance to modify requirements for residential separation buffers in the RP
(Residential Performance) Zoning District.
Mr. Klein .......................................................................................................................... (C)
ACTION ITEMS
7) Conditional Use Permit #07-17 for Caroline (Dixie) Scheulen, submitted for
construction of a special event facilities. The property is located at 283 Barracks Lane,
Winchester, Virginia and is identified with Property Identification Number 52- A -261 in
the Back Creek Magisterial District.
Mr. Klein .......................................................................................................................... (D)
8) 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP is a prioritized list of capital
projects requested by various County Departments and Agencies. The Plan is created as an
informational component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan.
Mrs. Perkins ..................................................................................................................... (E)
INFORMATION/DISCUSSION ITEMS
9) Master Development Plan #05-17 for Abrams Chase submitted by Painter –Lewis, PLC,
on behalf of Abrams Chase. This application seeks to develop 3.24 acres of land zoned RP
(Residential Performance) with 13 units age restricted single family. The subject properties
are located on Senseny Road (Route 657) 500’ west of intersection with Channing Drive, in
Shawnee Magisterial District, and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 65-A-
27A and 65-A-28A. Please note this item is presented for informational purposes only.
Mr. Klein .......................................................................................................................... (F)
10) Annual Review of Bylaws and Roles and Responsibilities
Mr. Ruddy ........................................................................................................................ (G)
Other
Adjourn
-2-
Commonly Used Planning Agenda Terms
Meeting format
Citizen Comments – The portion of the meeting agenda offering an opportunity for the public to provide
comment to the Planning Commission on any items not scheduled as public hearing items.
Public Hearing– A specific type of agenda item, required by State law, which incorporates public comment as
a part of that item prior to Planning Commission or Board of Supervisors action. Public hearings are held for
items such as: Comprehensive Plan policies and amendments; Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance amendments;
and Rezoning and Conditional Use Permit applications. Following the Public Hearing, the Planning
Commission will take action on the item (see below).
Action Item–There are both public hearing and non-public hearing items on which the Planning Commission
takes action. Depending on the actual item, the Planning Commission may approve, deny, table, or forward a
recommendation to the Board of Supervisors regarding the agenda item. No public comment is accepted during
the Action Item portion of the agenda.
Information/Discussion Item– The portion of the meeting agenda where items are presented to the Planning
Commission for information and discussion. The Planning Commission may offer comments and suggestions,
but does not take action on the agenda item. No public comment is accepted during the Information/Discussion
Item portion of the agenda.
Planning Terminology
Urban Development Area or UDA – The UDA is the county’s urban growth boundary identified in the
Comprehensive Plan in which more intensive forms of residential development will occur. The UDA is an area
of the county where community facilities and public services are more readily available and are provided more
economically.
Sewer and Water Service Area or SWSA – The SWSA is the boundary identified in the Comprehensive Plan
in which public water and sewer is or can be provided. The SWSA is consistent with the UDA in many
locations; however the SWSA may extend beyond the UDA to promote commercial, industrial, and institutional
land uses in area where residential land uses are not desirable.
Land Use – Land Use is the nomenclature which refers to the type of activity which may occur on an area of
land. Common land use categories include: agricultural, residential, commercial, and industrial.
Zoning District - Zoning district refers to a specific geographic area that is subject to land use standards.
Frederick County designates these areas, and establishes policies and ordinances over types of land uses,
density, and lot requirements in each zone. Zoning is the main planning tool of local government to manage the
future development of a community, protect neighborhoods, concentrate retail business and industry, and
channel traffic.
Rezoning – Rezoning is the process by which a property owner seeks to implement or modify the permitted
land use activities on their land. A rezoning changes the permitted land use activities within the categories
listed above under Land Use.
Conditional Use Permit or CUP - A CUP allows special land uses which may be desirable, but are not always
appropriate based on a location and surrounding land uses. The CUP requested use, which is not allowed as a
matter of right within a zoning district, is considered through a public hearing process and usually contains
conditions to minimize any impacts on surrounding properties.
Ordinance Amendment – The process by which the County Code is revised. Often the revisions are the result
of a citizen request with substantial justification supporting the change. Amendments ultimately proceed
through a public hearing prior to the PC forwarding a recommendation to the Board of Supervisors.
County Bodies Involved
Board of Supervisors or BOS - Frederick County is governed by an elected Board of Supervisors composed of
seven members, one from each magisterial district, and one chairman-at-large. The Board of Supervisors is the
policy-making body of the county. Functions of the Board of Supervisors related to planning include making
land use decisions, and establishing growth and development policies.
Planning Commission or PC - The PC is composed of 13 members, two from each magisterial districts and one
at-large, appointed by the Board of Supervisors. The Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity to the
Board of Supervisors which then takes final action on all planning, zoning, and land use matters.
Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee or CPPC – The CPPC is a major committee of the PC whose
primary responsibility is to formulate land use policies that shape the location and timing of development
throughout the County. Included in the work are studies of specific areas to develop guidelines for future land
use within those areas. The CPPC also considers requests for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.
Decisions by CPPC are then forwarded to the PC for consideration.
Development Review and Regulations Committee or DRRC – The DRRC is the second major committee of the
PC whose primary responsibilities involve the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan in the form of
Zoning and Subdivision ordinance requirements. Requests to amend the ordinances to the DRRC are made by
the Board of Supervisors, Planning Commission, local citizens, businesses, or organizations. DRRC decisions
are also forwarded to the PC for consideration.
A
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3463
Minutes of September 6, 2017
MEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on September 6, 2017
PRESENT: June M. Wilmot, Chairman/Member at Large; Robert S. Molden, Opequon District; Gary
R. Oates, Stonewall District; William H. Cline, Stonewall District; J. Rhodes Marston, Back Creek
District; Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Shawnee District; Kevin Kenney, Gainesboro District; Charles E.
Triplett, Gainesboro District; Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney.
ABSENT: Roger L. Thomas, Vice Chairman/Opequon District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District;
Christopher M. Mohn, Red Bud District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District.
STAFF PRESENT: Michael T. Ruddy, Director; Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director; Shannon L.
Conner, Administrative Assistant.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Wilmot called the September 6, 2017 meeting of the Frederick County
Planning Commission to order at 7:00 p.m. Chairman Wilmot commenced the meeting by inviting
everyone to join in a moment of silence.
RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION
Chairman Wilmot recognized Charles F. Dunlap with a Resolution of Appreciation for
serving on the Planning Commission representing the Red Bud Magisterial District. On behalf of the
Planning Commission, Chairman Wilmot expressed their gratitude to Mr. Dunlap and recognized his
many years of faithful service.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Cline, the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda for this evening’s meeting.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Marston, the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes from the June 7, 2017 and August 2, 2017
meetings.
-------------
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3464
Minutes of September 6, 2017
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Transportation Committee – Mtg. 08/28/17
Commissioner Oates reported the committee discussed six (6) items at their August
meeting and are as follows:
1. Revenue Sharing Policy Update
a. There are major changes that adversely affect Frederick County in our ability
to gain funding for projects; available funding from the state has been reduced
from $10 million to $5 million per year.
2. Smartscale Program Update
a. A major proposed change by the stat is a reduction in the number of
applications a locality can submit to four (4) projects; that is about half the
number of projects we typically submit in years past.
b. A second huge obstacle that is proposed is a project with proffered dollars will
not be eligible for funding; this may not allow us to receive matching funds
from the state.
3. VDOT Arterial Preservation Program
a. This is a new program that VDOT is implementing although it is still being
developed; this impacts all of our arterial roads such as Routes 11, 522, 7, and
50, it will make new entrances, intersections, and stop lights even harder to
obtain.
4. Route 37 and Shady Elm Road Access Management Discussion
a. VDOT is exploring a limited access break for the property lying between
Route 11, 37, and I-81 that is south of Gander Mountain; the MPO has studied
this twice in the past and is not supportive.
5. County Project Updates
a. Snowden Bridge Blvd in Graystone Industrial Park – rain storms have washed
out some shoulders and the County is working to fix these; it is expected the
road will be taken in the VDOT system this fall.
b. Tevis Street Extension at Airport Road and I-81 – the bridge design over I-81
is ongoing and reviewed and expected to be approved by the end of the year;
the round-about plans have been submitted for review and expected to be
approved in the spring; bids will go out before next summer.
c. Renaissance Drive – Property owner agreements have been received and the
Board is evaluating the status of revenue sharing funds before beginning the
design; the railroad crossing is being worked on between the County and CSX.
d. Valley Mill Road Realignment – A private partner has restated they do not
wish to continue to continue the project; Staff is exploring ways to transfer
matching funds obtained from the state to other projects.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3465
Minutes of September 6, 2017
e. Jubal Early Drive Extension and the interchange onto Route 37 – The County
has advanced the project as far as it can without an agreement from the
developer; to date, the developer has not committed to a revenue sharing
agreement.
Development Review and Regulations Committee – Mtg. 08/24/17
Commissioner Kenney reported the committee held discussion of a request to modify
requirements for residential separation buffers in the RP (Residential Performance) District. He noted
also discussed was a request to add solar (photovoltaic) power generating facilities to the use list for the
RA (Rural Areas) District.
Historic Resources Advisory Board – Mtg. 08/15/17
Commissioner Cline reported the Board reviewed a Rezoning Application for Carbaugh
Properties.
Frederick Water – Mtg. 08/15/17
Commissioner Oates reported the Board adopted the 2017 Sewer Master Plan which is
forecasted out for 30 years.
Board of Supervisors Report – Mtg. 08/09/17
Board of Supervisors’ Liaison, Supervisor Blaine Dunn reported the Board scheduled a
Public Hearing for the Abandonment of Gold Orchard Road (Route 708).
City of Winchester – Mtg. 08/15/17
Commissioner Loring, Winchester City Planning Commission Liaison, reported the
commission reviewed six (6) CUP’s and an ordinance amendment pertaining to signs.
-------------
CITIZEN COMMENTS
Chairman Wilmot called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the
Planning Commission’s agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission. No one
came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the citizen comments portion of the meeting.
-------------
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3466
Minutes of September 6, 2017
PUBLIC HEARING
2017–2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The CIP is a prioritized list of capital projects
requested by various County Department and Agencies. The Plan is created as an informational
component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan.
Action – Postponed by Majority Vote
Candice E. Perkins, Assistant Director reported the CIP is a document that consists of a
schedule for major capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five years and also a category for
long term projects that are 6+ years out. Ms. Perkins noted the inclusion of projects to the CIP is in no
way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects: the CIP is stric tly advisory;
the CIP is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding
allocations. Ms. Perkins continued it is possible that particular projects may not be funded during the
year that is indicated in the CIP; the status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the further in the
future it is projected.
Ms. Perkins reported the CIP is a document that is updated annually, with each cycle
projects are removed from the plan as they are completed or as prioritie s change. She noted the monetary
amounts shown within the CIP tables were compiled December 2016 – January 2017; some of these
figures may have changed. Ms. Perkins noted updated figures will be gathered during the next CIP cycle
(2018-2022). Ms. Perkins continued the CIP has been modified from its previous version to improve its
presentation and utility and these modifications reflect input provided by members of the Planning
Commission and Board of Supervisors. Ms. Perkins referenced the tables within the CIP have been
broken down into three (3) separate tables and the three (3) tables reflect projects that are County funded
versus projects funded by other sources (state/federal).
Ms. Perkins explained this year’s CIP continues to reinforce the connection between the
CIP, the 2035 Comprehensive Plan, and future rezoning applications. She reported the total number of
projects is 75 from Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional Library, Transportation, Winchester
Regional Airport, County Administration, and Fire and Rescue. Ms. Perkins reported there are three (3)
tables: General government expenditures (schools, parks, library, administration, fire and rescue);
Airport; Transportation.
Ms. Perkins concluded the CPPC endorsed the 2017-2022 CIP on in March, 2017 and
determined the CIP is in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan at which time it was forwarded
to the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors. The Planning Commission discussed this item in
April, 2017.
Commissioner Oates inquired as to why the CIP is now a five (5) year document when
typically it has been for one (1) year. Ms. Perkins explained the name has been tweaked to reflect a five
(5) year document and it will continue to be reviewed annually. Commissioner Oates asked if the CIP
will continue to be reviewed in December and January of each year. Mr. Ruddy explained it is
anticipated the CPPC and Planning Commission will be reviewing the document in December and then
moving it to the Board of Supervisors possibly around the time of the budget presentation; however we
will wait for direction from the Board of Supervisors.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3467
Minutes of September 6, 2017
Commissioner Oates inquired what the purpose is of adopting this CIP now and it only
being applicable for three (3) months. Ms. Perkins explained it is likely this document will be in effect
until spring 2018 and an updated CIP is needed on the books as soon as possible. Mr. Ruddy reported the
intent is to make sure the information received regarding the format of the CIP was reflected in the n ew
structure and everyone was comfortable with; as we continue to move forward. Commissioner Oates
continued to wonder why the need to adopt this now, if this were to be tabled for 90 days it could line up
with the new cycle and some information on this one is out of date. Mr. Ruddy noted any obvious
changes could be made before it goes to the Board of Supervisors for Public Hearing.
Commissioner Kenney commented he agrees with Commissioner Oates and inquired
when the new cycle would begin for the CIP. Ms. Perkins explained comments will be gathered this fall
from County agencies to prepare for the new cycle. Mr. Ruddy noted once this CIP is adopted by the
Board of Supervisors that would end the current cycle and allow the start of the new one.
Chairman Wilmot commented it is her understanding this was an effort to develop a
platform now and to move forward later. Ms. Perkins stated that is correct; with the new format and the
Board of Supervisors comments it is to solidify a good format and a new process for the CIP.
Commissioner Oates commented he would prefer it be called 2017-2018 CIP since it is a
yearly plan and why call it a five (5) year plan if it is being updated each year.
Chairman Wilmot called for anyone who wished to speak regarding this Public Hearing
to come forward at this time. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public
comment portion of the hearing.
Chairman Wilmot noted she sees the need to move this forward as it looks and reads
great; a job well done.
Commissioner Marston asked Commissioner Oates his reasoning for wanting to table the
CIP for 45 days. Commissioner Oates explained County agencies are in the process of updating their
numbers and updated information should be provided at that point by tabling.
Commissioner Triplett made a motion to recommend approval; there was not a second to
the motion.
Commissioner Oates made a motion to table the 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Plan
(CIP) for 45 days. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kenney and passed by majority vote.
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend tabling the
2017–2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 45 days.
YES: Oates, Kenney, Marston, Ambrogi, Molden, Cline
NO: Triplett, Wilmot
(Note: Commissioners Manuel, Mohn, Thomas, and Unger were absent from the meeting)
-------------
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3468
Minutes of September 6, 2017
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner
Oates to adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Cline and unanimously
passed. The meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
____________________________
June M. Wilmot, Chairman
____________________________
Michael T. Ruddy, Secretary
B
REZONING APPLICATION #04-17
CARBAUGH BUSINESS CENTER
Staff Report for the Planning Commission
Prepared: October 23, 2017
Staff Contact: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director
John Bishop, AICP, Assistant Director–Transportation
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 11/01/17 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 12/13/17 Pending
PROPOSAL: To rezone two parcels of land that total 107.21+/- acres from the RA (Rural Areas)
District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers.
LOCATION: The site has an address of 831 Shady Elm Road (Route 651) and are located on the
southeastern side of Shady Elm Road, approximately 1.11 miles southwest of the intersection of Shady
Elm Road and Apple Valley Road (Route 652). The southeastern portion of the site is bounded by the
CSX Railroad.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 11/01/17 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING:
This is an application to rezone two parcels of land that total 107.21+/- acres from the RA (Rural Areas)
District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. The subject properties are located within the
limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and are within the limits of the Kernstown Area
Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies these properties with an
industrial land use designation which is generally consistent with the requested M1 zoning.
With this rezoning, the Applicant has proffered that this project will contribute to transportation
improvements in the vicinity of the site that have been identified as important to the overall
transportation solution for this general area. The Applicant has proffered to participate in the cost of
transportation improvements to Renaissance Drive (up to a maximum of $1,080,000.00), right-of-way
dedications for Renaissance Drive and Shady Elm Road, limits on the number of access points for the
site, and proffers for inter-parcel connections for all new parcels. The Applicant has also provided
proffers for the screening of loading docks, landscaping, signage, documentation of the Carbaugh House
and monetary proffers for fire and rescue purposes.
Following the required public hearing, a recommendation regarding this rezoning application to
the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately
address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission.
Rezoning #03-17 Carbaugh Business Center
October 23, 2017
Page 2
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to a ssist them in making a decision on this
application. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter. Unresolved issues
concerning this application are noted by staff where relevant throughout this staff report.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 11/01/17 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 12/13/17 Pending
PROPOSAL: To rezone two parcels of land that total 107.21+/- acres from the RA (Rural Areas)
District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers.
LOCATION: The site has an address of 831 Shady Elm Road (Route 651) and are located on the
southeastern side of Shady Elm Road, approximately 1.11 miles southwest of the intersection of Shady
Elm Road and Apple Valley Road (Route 652). The southeastern portion of the site is bounded by the
CSX Railroad.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 74-A-68 and 74-A-69
PROPERTY ZONING: RA (Rural Areas) District
PRESENT USE: Vacant/Agricultural
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
North: M1 (Light Industrial) District Use: Vacant
RA (Rural Areas) District Residential, Agriculture
South: RA (Rural Areas) District Use: Residential, Agriculture
East: B3 (Industrial Transition) District Use: Commercial
RA (Rural Areas) District Railroad
West: RA (Rural Areas) District Use: Residential, Agriculture
Rezoning #03-17 Carbaugh Business Center
October 23, 2017
Page 3
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Dept. of Transportation (VDOT): Please see the attached email from Matthew Smith, P.E.,
dated September 7, 2017.
Frederick County Fire Marshall: Approved
Frederick Water: Please see the attached letter from Eric R. Lawrence, Executive Director dated
August 18, 2017.
Frederick County Department of Public Works: A comprehensive review shall occur at time of site
plan submission. We offer no additional comments at this time.
Virginia Department of Health: This Health Department has reviewed the request for comments for
the Rezoning of property located at 831 Shady Elm Road, in the Back Creek Magisterial District, Tax
Map #74-A-68 & 74-A-69 from RA to M1. Based upon information provided by the Applicant, this
Health Department has no objection to the rezoning of the subject property. However, it is the
recommendation of this Health Department that any know or discovered sewage disposal systems or
private water wells on the property be properly abandoned, per Health Department Regulations or best
practice policies. In the event that it is determined that there are sewage disposal systems or private
water wells on the property, please notify this Health Department immediately for proper abandonment
procedures.
Frederick County Planning Department: Please see the attached letter from Candice E. Perkins,
Assistant Director dated August 7, 2017.
Frederick County Transportation Comments: Please see the attached letter from John A. Bishop,
Assistant Director-Transportation dated August 7, 2017.
Historic Resources Advisory Board: The Historic Resources Advisory Board (HRAB)
recommended approval of the Rezoning with the condition that the Applicant perform an intensive level
survey on the historic structure located on-site (Henry Carbaugh House - #34-1040) prior to its
demolition.
Planning & Zoning:
1) Site History
The original Frederick County Zoning Map (U.S.G.S. Winchester Quadrangle) depicts the
subject properties as being zoned A-2 (Agricultural General) District. The County’s agricultural
zoning districts were subsequently combined to form the RA (Rural Areas) District upon
adoption of an amendment to the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance on May 10, 1989.
Rezoning #03-17 Carbaugh Business Center
October 23, 2017
Page 4
2) Comprehensive Plan
The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is the guide for the future growth of Frederick County.
The 2035 Comprehensive Plan is an official public document that serves as the Community's
guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities and other key
components of Community life. The primary goal of this plan is to protect and improve the
living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of policies used to
plan for the future physical development of Frederick County.
The Area Plans, Appendix I of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan, are the primary implementation
tool and will be instrumental to the future planning efforts of the County.
Land Use
The subject properties are located within the limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area
(SWSA) and are within the limits of the Kernstown Area Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan.
The Kernstown Area Plan identifies these properties with an industrial land use designation as
outlined in the Shady Elm Economic Development Area, which is generally consistent with the
requested M1 zoning designation.
The Shady Elm Economic Development Area is designed to be a significant area of industrial
and commercial opportunity that is fully supportive of the County Economic Development
Authority’s targeted goals and strategies. The intent of the industrial designation is to further
enhance the County’s commercial and industrial areas and to provide focus to the County’s
future regional employment centers.
Transportation and Site Access
The Eastern Road Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and the Kernstown Area Plan both call
for the extension of a new major collector roadway though parcel 74-A-68, which is adjacent to
the Artillery Business Center Development which was rezoned in 2007 and revised in 2015.
This new major collector roadway, Renaissance Drive, has been constructed from Valley Pike
(Route 11) to the limits of the CXS railroad. The Comprehensive Plan calls for this roadway to
be extended to Shady Elm Road. The plan also calls for Shady Elm Road to be improved four
lane divided collector roadway. Site access to the subject property will be provided via two
entrances on Renaissance Drive.
3) Site Suitability/Environment:
The site is not located within or near any 100-year floodplains. The site has some wetlands in
the form of two small farm ponds and a spring. The spring feeds one of the ponds and drains
via a culvert under the CSX railroad; the Applicant intends on preserving the spring and lower
pond while removing the upper pond. There are no areas of mature woodlands. The site does
contain 46 acres of prime agricultural farmland and 59 acres of farmland of statewide
importance.
Rezoning #03-17 Carbaugh Business Center
October 23, 2017
Page 5
4) Potential Impacts:
Existing Residential Uses:
This application recognizes the existing residential land uses that are zoned RA (Rural Areas)
District that are located adjacent to and across Shady Elm Road from the Carbaugh Property by
providing buffering and landscape screening (full screen) consistent with the Zoning Ordinance
to screen the development and loading docks from Shady Elm Road. This buffer consists of
100’ of distance (75’ active/25’ inactive), a 6’ berm and 3 plants per 10 linear feet.
Historic Resources:
The Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley published by National Park Service
Study of Civil War Sites in the Shenandoah Valley does not identify a core battlefield on the
site. The battle maps for the 1st and 2nd Battles of Kernstown show that troops might have
marched across the subject property on their way to the battles, no fighting is recorded on the
property. The Historic Resources Advisory Board recommended that the Applicant conduct an
intensive level survey on the historic structure located on-site (Henry Carbaugh House - #34-
1040) prior to its demolition; the Applicant included this in their proffer statement.
Frederick County Transportation Comments:
The Applicant’s Transportation Impact Analysis assumes 46.9 acres of light manufacturing and
46.9 acres of warehousing uses. This results in average weekday vehicle trips totaling 4,820
which the Applicant proposes to address via transportation proffers of right-of-way and funding
toward the Renaissance Drive project. The proffered funding amount allows the County to fully
match revenue sharing funds that have been awarded to the project.
5) Proffer Statement – Dated October 6, 2017
Site Improvements:
1. The owner agrees to participate in the cost of transportation improvements in the nearby
area, up to a maximum of $1,080,000.00. Such payment shall be made either within 30
calendar days after the start of the Renaissance Drive extension or prior to the issuance
of the certificate of occupancy for all buildings developed on the Property, whichever
comes first.
2. The owner agrees to dedicate 60’ of right-of-way along Shady Elm Road, 10’ of which
shall be used for construction of a pedestrian trail.
3. The owner agrees to dedicate 20’ of right-of-way along its northeast boundary for the
extension of Renaissance Drive from Valley Pike to Shady Elm Road.
4. The owner agrees to grant to Frederick County an 80’ grading/slope easement for the
construction and maintenance of a bridge over the CSX rail line that will be part of the
extension of the Renaissance Drive.
5. The owner agrees to limit the number of commercial entrances for the property to a
maximum of two along Renaissance Drive.
a. In the event that the property is developed prior to the completion of
Renaissance Drive, the owner may build a portion of the road from Shady Elm
Road to the first entrance to the site to enable use of the site.
Rezoning #03-17 Carbaugh Business Center
October 23, 2017
Page 6
b. In the event that Frederick County requests that the owner not build a portion of
the extension, the owner may build a temporary entrance onto Shady Elm Road
for commercial use. The temporary entrance will be permanently closed
immediately after Renaissance Drive is available for use by the applicant.
6. The owner proffers to provide for inter-parcel connections for all new lots to provide
access to the access points on Renaissance Drive.
Building Restrictions:
The development of the subject Property shall include the following building restrictions:
1. All loading docks shall be screened from view from all adjacent properties in the RA
(Rural Areas) Zoning District that are located west of Shady Elm Road. The owner will
utilize a 100’ Category C (full Screen) buffer.
2. Individual business signs will be prohibited along Shady Elm Road.
3. The owner will perform an intensive level survey on the Henry Carbaugh House prior to
its demolition.
Landscape Design Features
1. The owner shall provide street trees planted 50’ on center adjacent to the Renaissance
Drive road extension.
Monetary Contributions to Offset Impact of Development:
The owner proffers to pay $30,000.00 prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy for
the first structure constructed on the property for fire and rescue purposes.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY & STAFF CONCLUSION FOR THE 11/01/17 PLANNING
COMMISSION MEETING:
This is an application to rezone two parcels of land that total 107.21+/- acres from the RA (Rural Areas)
District to the M1 (Light Industrial) District with proffers. The subject properties are located within the
limits of the Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and are within the limits of the Kernstown Area
Plan of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. The Comprehensive Plan identifies these properties with an
industrial land use designation which is generally consistent with the requested M1 zoning.
With this rezoning, the Applicant has proffered that this project will contribute to transportation
improvements in the vicinity of the site that have been identified as important to the overall
transportation solution for this general area. The Applicant has proffered to participate in the cost of
transportation improvements to Renaissance Drive (up to a maximum of $1,080,000.00), right-of-way
dedications for Renaissance Drive and Shady Elm Road, limits on the number of access points for the
site, and proffers for inter-parcel connections for all new parcels. The Applicant has also provided
proffers for the screening of loading docks, landscaping, signage, documentation of the Carbaugh House
and monetary proffers for fire and rescue purposes.
Following the required public hearing, a recommendation regarding this rezoning application to
the Board of Supervisors would be appropriate. The Applicant should be prepared to adequately
address all concerns raised by the Planning Commission.
§¨¦81
ST651
ST649
ST651
74 A 69
74 A 68
579SPRINGDALE RD
634SPRINGDALE RD
371SPRINGDALE DR
4330VALLEYPIKE
4324VALLEYPIKE
4273VALLEYPIKE
115SPRINGDALE RD
507SPRINGDALE RD
117SPRINGDALE RD
124SPRINGDALE RD
140SPRINGDALE RD
4227VALLEYPIKE
142MUSKET DR421SPRINGDALE RD
385SPRINGDALE RD
385SPRINGDALE RD
222SPRINGDALE RD
136MUSKET DR
834SHADYELM RD
400SPRINGDALE RD
364SPRINGDALE RD
224SPRINGDALE RD
4200VALLEYPIKE
970SHADYELM RD
1043SHADYELM RD
316SPRINGDALE RD
4184VALLEYPIKE
111MUSKET DR 131MUSKET DR
1006SHADYELM RD
4118VALLEYPIKE
4141VALLEYPIKE
126MARATHON DR
983SHADYELM RD 4168VALLEYPIKE
4110VALLEYPIKE
4095VALLEYPIKE
957SHADYELM RD
141SKYJES LN 4050VALLEYPIKE
183SKYJES LN161SKYJES LN 121SKYJES LN
4046VALLEYPIKE
4046VALLEYPIKE
4006VALLEYPIKE
180SKYJES LN
164SKYJES LN 138SKYJES LN
251PROSPERITY DR
125PROSPERITY DR
113HOCKMAN CT 201PROSPERITY DR
171HOCKMAN CT
147HOCKMAN CT
133HOCKMAN CT
553SHADYELM RD
240PROSPERITY DR
220PROSPERITY DR 161PROSPERITY DR
191HOCKMAN CT
114HOCKMAN CT
170PROSPERITY DR
166HOCKMAN CT130HOCKMAN CT 750SHADYELM RD
210PROSPERITY DR
180PROSPERITY DR
3862VALLEYPIKE
190HOCKMAN CT188HOCKMAN CT
690SHADYELM RD
561SHADYELM RD
100DEVELOPMENT LN
160INDUSTRIAL DR
225SOLDIERSREST LN
121DEVELOPMENT LN229SOLDIERSREST LN 110INDUSTRIAL DR
161INDUSTRIAL DR
DEST
I
N
Y
DR
MUSK
E
T
D
R
DEVE
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
N
MILL LN
VAL
L
E
Y
PIK
E
IND
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
D
R
RENAISS
A
N
C
E
D
R
SKYJES L
N
SO
L
D
I
E
R
S
R
E
S
T
L
N
H
O
C
K
M
A
N
C
T
NAR
R
O
W
L
N
PRO
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
D
R
SHA
D
Y
E
L
M
R
D
SPRINGDALE
R
D
Applications
Sewer and Water Service Area
Parcels
Building Footprints
B1 (Neighborhood Business District)
B2 (General Business District)
B3 (Industrial Transition District)
EM (Extractive Manufacturing District)
HE (Higher Education District)
M1 (Light Industrial District)
M2 (Industrial General District)
MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)
MS (Medical Support District)
OM (Office - Manufacturing Park)
R4 (Residential Planned Community District)
R5 (Residential Recreational Community District)
RA (Rural Areas District)
RP (Residential Performance District)
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: October 10, 2017Staff: cperkins
VAL
L
E
Y
P
I
K
E
SPRING
D
A
L
E
R
D
SHA
D
Y
E
L
M
R
D
TAS
K
E
R
R
D
PRO
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
D
R
SKYJES LN
SUL
K
Y
D
R
§¨¦81
0111
0137
0137
REZ # 04 - 17Carbaugh Business CenterPINs:74 - A - 68, 74 - A - 69Rezoning from RA to M1Zoning Map
0 840 1,680420 Feet
REZ # 04 - 17Carbaugh Business CenterPINs:74 - A - 68, 74 - A - 69Rezoning from RA to M1Zoning Map
0111
REZ #04-17
REZ #04-17
§¨¦81
ST651
ST649
ST651
74 A 69
74 A 68
579SPRINGDALE RD
634SPRINGDALE RD
371SPRINGDALE DR
4330VALLEYPIKE
4324VALLEYPIKE
4273VALLEYPIKE
115SPRINGDALE RD
507SPRINGDALE RD
117SPRINGDALE RD
124SPRINGDALE RD
140SPRINGDALE RD
4227VALLEYPIKE
142MUSKET DR421SPRINGDALE RD
385SPRINGDALE RD
385SPRINGDALE RD
222SPRINGDALE RD
136MUSKET DR
834SHADYELM RD
400SPRINGDALE RD
364SPRINGDALE RD
224SPRINGDALE RD
4200VALLEYPIKE
970SHADYELM RD
1043SHADYELM RD
316SPRINGDALE RD
4184VALLEYPIKE
111MUSKET DR 131MUSKET DR
1006SHADYELM RD
4118VALLEYPIKE
4141VALLEYPIKE
126MARATHON DR
983SHADYELM RD 4168VALLEYPIKE
4110VALLEYPIKE
4095VALLEYPIKE
957SHADYELM RD
141SKYJES LN 4050VALLEYPIKE
183SKYJES LN161SKYJES LN 121SKYJES LN
4046VALLEYPIKE
4046VALLEYPIKE
4006VALLEYPIKE
180SKYJES LN
164SKYJES LN 138SKYJES LN
251PROSPERITY DR
125PROSPERITY DR
113HOCKMAN CT 201PROSPERITY DR
171HOCKMAN CT
147HOCKMAN CT
133HOCKMAN CT
553SHADYELM RD
240PROSPERITY DR
220PROSPERITY DR 161PROSPERITY DR
191HOCKMAN CT
114HOCKMAN CT
170PROSPERITY DR
166HOCKMAN CT130HOCKMAN CT 750SHADYELM RD
210PROSPERITY DR
180PROSPERITY DR
3862VALLEYPIKE
190HOCKMAN CT188HOCKMAN CT
690SHADYELM RD
561SHADYELM RD
100DEVELOPMENT LN
160INDUSTRIAL DR
225SOLDIERSREST LN
121DEVELOPMENT LN229SOLDIERSREST LN 110INDUSTRIAL DR
161INDUSTRIAL DR
DEST
I
N
Y
DR
MUSK
E
T
D
R
DEVE
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
L
N
MILL LN
VAL
L
E
Y
PIK
E
IND
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
D
R
RENAISS
A
N
C
E
D
R
SKYJES L
N
SO
L
D
I
E
R
S
R
E
S
T
L
N
H
O
C
K
M
A
N
C
T
NAR
R
O
W
L
N
PRO
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
D
R
SHA
D
Y
E
L
M
R
D
SPRINGDALE
R
D
Applications
Sewer and Water Service Area
Parcels
Building Footprints
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: October 10, 2017Staff: cperkins
VAL
L
E
Y
P
I
K
E
SPRING
D
A
L
E
R
D
SHA
D
Y
E
L
M
R
D
TAS
K
E
R
R
D
PRO
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
D
R
SKYJES LN
SUL
K
Y
D
R
§¨¦81
0111
0137
0137
REZ # 04 - 17Carbaugh Business CenterPINs:74 - A - 68, 74 - A - 69Rezoning from RA to M1Location Map
0 840 1,680420 Feet
REZ # 04 - 17Carbaugh Business CenterPINs:74 - A - 68, 74 - A - 69Rezoning from RA to M1Location Map
0111
REZ #04-17
REZ #04-17
0111
§¨¦81
ST651
ST651
ST651
ST649
74 A 69
74 A 68
634SPRINGDALE RD
371SPRINGDALE DR 4330VALLEYPIKE
4273VALLEYPIKE
579SPRINGDALE RD
4324VALLEYPIKE
507SPRINGDALE RD
115SPRINGDALE RD
117SPRINGDALE RD
124SPRINGDALE RD
140SPRINGDALE RD
421SPRINGDALE RD
385SPRINGDALE RD
385SPRINGDALE RD 4227VALLEY PIKE
136MUSKET DR
142MUSKET DR
834SHADYELM RD
224SPRINGDALE RD
222SPRINGDALE RD
970SHADYELM RD
400SPRINGDALE RD
1043SHADYELM RD
364SPRINGDALE RD
316SPRINGDALE RD
4184VALLEYPIKE
4200VALLEYPIKE
131MUSKET DR
1006SHADYELM RD
4118VALLEY PIKE
111MUSKET DR
983SHADYELM RD 4168VALLEYPIKE
4125VALLEYPIKE
957SHADYELM RD
141SKYJES LN 4050VALLEYPIKE
183SKYJES LN
161SKYJES LN 121SKYJES LN
4046VALLEYPIKE
4046VALLEYPIKE
180SKYJES LN
164SKYJES LN 138SKYJES LN
251PROSPERITY DR4006VALLEYPIKE
201PROSPERITY DR
147HOCKMAN CT133HOCKMAN CT113HOCKMAN CT
553SHADYELM RD
240PROSPERITY DR 161PROSPERITY DR
191HOCKMAN CT
171HOCKMAN CT 220PROSPERITY DR
166HOCKMAN CT
114HOCKMAN CT
130HOCKMAN CT
210PROSPERITY DR
180PROSPERITY DR
190HOCKMAN CT
750SHADYELM RD
690SHADYELM RD
188HOCKMAN CT
561SHADYELM RD
100DEVELOPMENT LN
160INDUSTRIAL DR
225SOLDIERSREST LN
110INDUSTRIAL DR
121DEVELOPMENT LN
229SOLDIERSREST LN
161INDUSTRIAL DR
227SOLDIERSREST LN
121INDUSTRIAL DR
MUSK
E
T
D
R
MILL LN
DEVE
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
LN
RENAI
S
S
A
N
C
E
D
R
VAL
L
E
Y
PIKE
SKYJES L
N
H
O
C
K
M
A
N
C
T
PRO
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
D
R
NAR
R
O
W
L
N
IND
U
S
T
R
I
A
L
D
R
S
O
L
D
I
E
R
S
R
E
S
T
L
N
SHA
D
Y
E
L
M
R
D
SPRINGDAL
E
R
D
Applications
Sewer and Water Service Area
Parcels
Building Footprints
Long Range Land Use
Residential
Neighborhood Village
Urban Center
Mobile Home Community
Business
Highway Commercial
Mixed-Use
Mixed Use Commercial/Office
Mixed Use Industrial/Office
Industrial
Warehouse
Heavy Industrial
Extractive Mining
Commercial Rec
Rural Community Center
Fire & Rescue
Sensitive Natural Areas
Institutional
Planned Unit Development
Park
Recreation
School
Employment
Airport Support Area
B2 / B3
Residential, 4 u/a
High-Density Residential, 6 u/a
High-Density Residential, 12-16 u/a
Rural Area
Interstate Buffer
Landfill Support Area
Natural Resources & Recreation
Environmental & Recreational Resources
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: October 10, 2017Staff: cperkins
VAL
L
E
Y
P
I
K
E
SPRING
D
A
L
E
R
D
SHA
D
Y
E
L
M
R
D
TAS
K
E
R
R
D
PRO
S
P
E
R
I
T
Y
D
R
SKYJES LN
SUL
K
Y
D
R
§¨¦81
0111
0137
0137
REZ # 04 - 17Carbaugh Business CenterPINs:74 - A - 68, 74 - A - 69Rezoning from RA to M1Long Range Land Use Map
0 925 1,850462.5 Feet
REZ # 04 - 17Carbaugh Business CenterPINs:74 - A - 68, 74 - A - 69Rezoning from RA to M1Long Range Land Use Map
REZ #04-17
REZ #04-17
C
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Planner
SUBJECT: Ordinance Amendment – Residential Separation Buffer Waiver – Public
Hearing
DATE: October 20, 2017
This is a proposed amendment to Chapter 165 – Zoning Ordinance to modify the
requirement for residential separation buffers in the RP (Residential Performance) Zoning
District. Currently, residential separation buffers are required to adequately buffer
different housing types from dissimilar housing types within adjacent separate
developments.
Staff has drafted a revision to the Zoning Ordinance to modify the required residential
separation buffer between single-family detached (SFD) units, townhome units, single-
family small lot (attached and detached) units and townhome units. The modification
would change the required buffer category from a Category B Type Buffer to a Category
A Type Buffer. The intent of this modification is to provide flexibility for smaller infill -
type lots in the RP Zoning District, ensuring the desired housing densities are sited where
they are planned for as part of the County’s 2035 Comprehensive Plan’s Long Range
Land Use Plan (LRLUP).
This item was proposed through a request from a private developer and discussed by the
Development Review and Regulations Committee (DRRC) at their April 27, May 25,
July 27, and August 24, 2017 regular meetings. The Planning Commission discussed this
item at the June 7, 2017 meeting. The DRRC agreed with the proposed changes from
their August 24, 2017 meeting, and the item was forwarded to the Planning Commission
for discussion on September 20, 2017.
The Board of Supervisors discussed this item at their October 11, 2017 meeting. The
Board of Supervisors expressed concern with reducing the buffer distance between
certain housing types, noting the perceived incompatibility of townhomes with single-
family detached residences. The Board of Supervisors sent the item forward for public
hearing.
The attached document shows the existing ordinance with the proposed change supported
by the DRRC (with bold italic for text added). This proposed amendment is being
presented to the Planning Commission as a public hearing item. Staff is seeking a
recommendation from the Planning Commission. The recommendation from the
Planning Commission will be forwarded to the Board of Supervisors.
Attachment: 1. Revised ordinance with additions shown in bold underlined italics.
MTK/pd
Article II
SUPPLEMENTARY USE REGULATIONS; PARKING; BUFFERS; AND REGULATIONS FOR SPECIFIC USES
Part 203. Buffers and Landscaping
§ 165-203.02. Buffer and screening requirements.
C. Residential separation buffers. Residential separation buffers shall be established to adequately
buffer different housing types from dissimilar housing types within adjacent separate developments.
The requirements for residential separation buffers are as follows:
(1) When placed adjacent to one another, developments with different housing types shall
provide the following residential separation buffers:
Minimum Residential Separation Buffer Area Required
Proposed Use/Development Adjoining Existing Use/Development
1 2 3 4 5
1. Single-family detached - - A B B
2. Single-family zero lot line or small lot - - A B B
3. Multiplex or Townhouse A A - B B
4. Garden apartment or multifamily
buildings
C C B - A
5. Age-restricted multifamily C C C - -
D
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #07-17
Caroline (Dixie) Scheulen - Special Event Facility
Staff Report for the Planning Commission
Prepared: October 20, 2017
Staff Contact: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Planner
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist them in making a decision on this
request. It may also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 09/20/17 Public Hearing Held; Postponed
Planning Commission: 11/01/17 Public Meeting
Board of Supervisors: 12/13/17 Pending
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a special event facility in the RA (Rural
Areas) Zoning District. Should the Planning Commission find this application for a special event
facility to be appropriate, Staff recommends that the following conditions be attached to the
CUP:
1. All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times.
2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick
County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and approved by Frederick County prior
to the establishment of the use. Building permits are also required for all buildings and
structures.
3. Events shall start no earlier than 10 a.m. and all events and related activities shall conclude
by midnight.
4. All outside music shall conclude by 9 p.m. Music may continue indoors until the
conclusion of the event.
5. All lighting shall be downcast to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and residences.
6) Access to the site shall be provided to Woodchuck Lane (Route 654) via Barracks Lane
(private internal access drive). The Applicant shall relocate Barracks Lane on PIN 52-A-
261 to ensure the access drive to the event center is not immediately adjacent to the
southern property boundary of Parcel 52-A-280A in general conformance with the layout
below:
Page 2
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
7) In the future, should the owner of parcel 52-A-261 be able to secure private access to
Cather Lane (Route 711), Round Hill Road (Route 803), or Woodchuck Lane (Route
654) through a recorded deed of easement or written consent from the property owner, a
new CUP would not be required to implement such access.
8) Events may accommodate up to and not to exceed 280 persons.
9) One (1) monument style sign with a maximum sign area not to exceed 50 square feet (SF)
and not to exceed 10 feet (FT) in height is permitted.
10) Any expansion or modification of this use will require the approval of a new CUP.
Following this public meeting, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a
recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors.
Page 3
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
LOCATION: This approximately 135-acre property is located at 283 Barracks Lane, Winchester,
Virginia, immediately south of Route 50 (Northwestern Pike) and Round Hill Road and
immediately west of Woodchuck Lane.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Back Creek
PROPERTY ID NUMBER: 52-A-261
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE: Zoned: RA (Rural Areas)
Land Use: Agriculture/Open Space
ADJOINING PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
North: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural/Vacant
South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural
East: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential
West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential/Agricultural
PROPOSED USE:
This is a request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to enable the establishment of a special event
center for weddings and other similar type events in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District.
Improvements to the property will include construction of a 5,000-square foot (SF) event center
(including restrooms, kitchen and storage), a 600 SF detached bridal suite, a concrete patio and
gazebo. The Applicant intends to develop this project in phases.
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Department of Transportation: (10-11-17 VDOT Comment Letter) The existing
entrance (Barracks Lane) meets the minimum sight distance requirements for a commercial
entrance/street connection. Moving the entrance east along the property frontage on Woodchuck
Lane would present more challenges to overcome, foremost obtaining substantial permanent sight
distance easements from the neighbor across the street and the neighbor to the east. The Round
Hill Road option isn’t a great location either with the undesirable skew of the railroad tracks which
are located in the functional area of the intersection.
(06-30-17 VDOT Comment Letter) The application for the Conditional Use Permit for this
property appears to have a measurable impact on Route 803 (Round Hill Road), the VDOT facility
which would provide access to the property. Prior to operation of the bu siness a commercial
entrance must be constructed to our standards to allow for safe egress and ingress of the property.
Any work performed on the State’s right-of-way must be covered under a land use permit. The
Page 4
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
permit is issued by this office and requires an inspection fee and surety coverage.
Frederick County Inspections: Please see attached comments from Mark Fleet, Building Code
Official dated August 17, 2017.
Winchester-Frederick County Health Department: Please see attached letter from Herbert
Cormier, Environment Health Supervisor, Lord Fairfax Health District dated June 1, 2017.
Frederick Water: No comments.
Frederick County Fire Marshall: Please see attached comments from Kenneth Scott, Jr., Fire
Inspector, Fire & Rescue dated June 5, 2017.
City of Winchester: No comments.
Winchester Regional Airport: No comments.
Historic Resources Advisory Board: Please see attached letter from Candice E. Perkins, AICP,
Assistant Director/Staff to HRAB, dated June 23, 2017.
Planning and Zoning: This application is for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to permit the
establishment of a special event facility for private events such as weddings. A special event
facility is a permitted use in the RA (Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved CUP. The
Zoning Ordinance defines “special event facility” as a facility or site utilized for events that are
typically conducted on a single day but which may be conducted for up to three consecutive days,
for which attendance is permitted only by invitation or reservation; special events include, but are
not limited to, meetings, conferences, banquets, dinners, weddings and private parties.
This proposed use will take place on a 135.8-acre property, which is currently being used for
agricultural purposes (raising of cattle and farming hay). The special event facility will be accessed
via Barracks Lane (a private drive), from Woodchuck Lane (State Route 654), a state-owned
roadway. The Applicant intends to use a portion of the site for the proposed special event facility,
while maintaining the remainder of the site as productive agricultural land. The Applicant proposes
to erect an approximately 5,000 square foot (SF, 50’ x 100’) one-story event center, which includes
a kitchen, permanent restrooms, banquet hall and storage, a separate approximately 600 SF bridal
suite, and an outdoor concrete patio and gazebo. This facility may accommodate events up to 280
persons (note: actual occupancy, not to exceed 280 persons, will be determined at time of site
plan). The Applicant states the design and architecture of the proposed event center and accessory
buildings will be consistent with structures found in the County’s rural areas. The Applicant also
intends phase construction of the facility and accessory structures. All buildings relating to the
proposed use, a special event facility, would require building permits and would not be eligible for
an agricultural exemption.
Page 5
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
The property is surrounded by RA (Rural Areas) and RP (Residential Performance) zoned
property, which includes open space, agricultural uses, and single-family detached residences. The
2035 Comprehensive Policy Plan of Frederick County (Comprehensive Plan) identifies this area
of the County as “rural” and is to remain agricultural in nature and is not part of any land use study.
The Board of Supervisors added “special event facilities” to the conditional use list for the
County’s Rural Areas Zoning District in May 2017 to support additional opportunities for
agribusiness and agritourism. The proposed use is consistent with the goals and strategies
expressed in the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and the surrounding properties.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 09/20/17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times.
2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick
County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and approved by Frederick County prior
to the establishment of the use. Building permits are also required for all buildings and
structures.
3. Events shall start no earlier than 10 a.m. and all events and related activities shall conclude
by midnight.
4. Events may accommodate up to and not to exceed 280 persons.
5. One (1) monument style sign with a maximum sign area not to exceed 50 square feet (SF)
and not to exceed 10 feet (FT) in height is permitted.
6. Any expansion or modification of this use will require the approval of a new CUP.
PLANNING COMMISSION SUMMARY AND ACTION OF THE 09/20/17 MEETING:
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 20, 2017. Planning Staff provided
an overview of the proposed use, noting the Applicant had satisfied all County requirements and
comments from review agencies. The Applicant, Mrs. Caroline “Dixie” Scheulen also spoke,
noting her desire to open a special event facility for weddings at 238 Barracks Lane, and to
maintain the rural character of the property, and be a good neighbor along Woodchuck Lane. Mrs.
Claire Boyd, the property owner and co-applicant, also spoke on the merits of the application, and
a demand for a wedding venue to support visitors from Northern Virginia, and nearby stat es, in
addition to local residents.
Page 6
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
During the public hearing, several members of the public spoke in opposition of the proposed
special event facility, citing concerns regarding traffic along Woodchuck Lane, vehicle safety
entering and leaving the site, noise from live music, outdoor lighting shining onto adjacent homes
and trash. Planning Staff responded to several of the concerns raised by the public, specifically
vehicle access, safety, noise, and lighting:
Vehicle Access & Safety: As evaluated by the Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) as
part of the CUP application, Barracks Lane is the preferred point-of-access due to appropriate sight
distance onto Woodchuck Lane, and from Woodchuck Lane onto Round Hill Road (old Route 50).
Barracks Lane is also a private drive on the Applicants property. Staff noted one solution may be
the relocation of Barracks Lane along the property frontage and away from the neighboring
residence, however, this would require an additional review from VDOT to ensure it would be
appropriate. Other alternative vehicle access evaluated by VDOT and Planning Staff included:
shared private access to existing Cather Lane to Round Hill Road; shared private access across the
old Round Hill Volunteer Fire Station property to Round Hill Road; and proposed private access
across an adjacent owner’s property to Round Hill Road. Staff noted that under the County’s
Zoning Ordinance’s “Supplemental Use Regulations for Special Event Facilities,” shared access
across adjacent property would also require the Applicant to have written consent from those
owners to utilize a private easement and as such these other points of access may not be feasible.
Staff further stated that VDOT had informally commented that these alternatives also may present
issues with site distance onto Round Hill Road.
The Planning Commission directed Staff to work with the Applicant, and VDOT, to consider
relocation of Barracks Lane east along the property frontage to have less impact on an adjacent
property.
Noise: Staff noted noise was evaluated during the CUP application. The proposed buildings would
need to adhere to the Virginia (VA) Statewide Building Code requirements, and a Condition had
been included regarding hours of operation. Staff also noted the location of the proposed building
was more than 1,300 FT from the nearest residence.
The Planning Commission directed Staff to work with the Applicant to further restrict outdoor
music, as applicable, to not adversely impact adjacent residences.
Lighting: Staff noted outdoor lighting would be evaluated during review of the site plan
application, and that the County’s Zoning Ordinance contained provisions for outdoor lighting
standards. Staff also noted the location of the proposed building was more than 1,300 FT from the
nearest residence.
The Planning Commission directed Staff to work with the Applicant to further restrict outdoor
lighting, as applicable, to not adversely impact adjacent residences.
Page 7
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
The Planning Commission continued to discuss the merits of the application, and concerns raised
by members of the public. The Planning Commission voted 8-3-1 (Commissioners Marston,
Ambrogi & Manual objecting; Commissioner Oates absent) to postpone action for 30-days on the
CUP application, and requested Staff work to with the Applicant to include additional Conditions
of Approval to address comments and concerns raised during the public hearing and Planning
Commission discussion. Staff noted the application would come back to the Planning Commission
at the November 1, 2017 meeting.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 11/01/17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
Following the Planning Commission Public Hearing and discussion on September 20, Staff sought
additional written comments from VDOT (attached, dated 10-11-17) regarding the proposed point-
of-access using Barracks Lane, and alternative points-of-access. Per VDOT’s comments, the
current location of the Barracks Lane ingress from and egress to Woodchuck Lane is preferred as
it meets sight distance requirements for vehicle safety. Alternative points-of-access (i.e. to Round
Hill Road through the old Round Hill Volunteer Fire Station property or relocating Barracks Lane
to the east) have restricted lines of sight which may impede vehicle safety exiting the property and
would require the Applicant to acquire sight distance easements from neighboring properties.
Additional points-of-access evaluated by Staff included: Cather Lane (State Roadway 711), direct
access to Round Hill Road (State Roadway 803) or another connection to Woodchuck Lane (Route
654). Cather Lane is currently an unpaved roadway, of minimal width, with an un-signalized
railroad crossing. Based on Staff’s research, it does not appear the Applicant’s property has direct
access to Cather Lane through a private access agreement or recorded deed -of-easement. Direct
access from the subject property to Round Hill Road, or to Woodchuck Lane at a different location,
would require the Applicant to obtain ownership of adjacent private property or written permission
from the adjoining property owner to access the state road network. As required under the County’s
Zoning Ordinance “Supplemental Use Regulations for Special Event Facilities” (Section §165-
204.03(E)), special event facilities that share a private access easement with another property
owner/s must show the easement allows a use of this type or written permission must be obtained
by the sharing parties.
To address comments identified at the September 20th Planning Commission Public Hearing, Staff
has drafted additional conditions (see numbers 4, 5, 6, & 7 below). These new conditions further
prohibit outdoor music after 9 p.m.; would require any outdoor lighting to be downcast to avoid
glare onto adjacent properties and residences; and would realign the internal access drive (Barracks
Lane) to avoid traffic passing directly by and vehicle headlights shining directly onto an adjacent
residence. Further, Staff has included a condition to allow a new point-of-access without requiring
a new CUP should the Applicant be able to secure a deed of easement or written consent from an
adjacent property owner for use.
Page 8
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
Should the Planning Commission find this use appropriate, Staff would suggest the following
conditions be placed on the CUP:
1. All review agency comments shall be complied with at all times.
2. An engineered site plan, in accordance with the requirements of Article VIII of the Fredrick
County Zoning Ordinance, shall be submitted to and approved by Frederick County prior
to the establishment of the use. Building permits are also required for all buildings and
structures.
3. Events shall start no earlier than 10 a.m. and all events and related activities shall conclude
by midnight.
4) All outside music shall conclude by 9 p.m. Music may continue indoors until the
conclusion of the event.
5) All lighting shall be downcast to avoid glare onto adjacent properties and residences.
6) Access to the site shall be provided to Woodchuck Lane (Route 654) via Barracks Lane
(private internal access drive). The Applicant shall relocate Barracks Lane on PIN 52-A-
261 to ensure the access drive to the event center is not immediately adjacent to the
southern property boundary of Parcel 52-A-280A in general conformance with the layout
below:
7) In the future, should the owner of parcel 52-A-261 be able to secure private access to
Cather Lane (Route 711), Round Hill Road (Route 803), or Woodchuck Lane (Route
654) through a recorded deed of easement or written consent from the property owner, a
Page 9
CUP #07-17, Caroline Dixie Scheulen – Special Event Facility
October 20, 2017
new CUP would not be required to implement such access.
8) Events may accommodate up to and not to exceed 280 persons.
9) One (1) monument style sign with a maximum sign area not to exceed 50 square feet (SF)
and not to exceed 10 feet (FT) in height is permitted.
10) Any expansion or modification of this use will require the approval of a new CUP.
Following this public meeting, it would be appropriate for the Planning Commission to offer a
recommendation concerning this application to the Board of Supervisors.
CATHER LOTSSubdivision
0150
ST803
ST654
ST803
52 A 261
760WOODCHUCK LN
285FOXMEADOW LN
622WOODCHUCK LN
435WOODCHUCK LN
561WOODCHUCK LN
600WOODCHUCK LN
492WOODCHUCK LN
238CATHER LN
474WOODCHUCK LN
454WOODCHUCK LN
430WOODCHUCK LN
388WOODCHUCK LN404WOODCHUCK LN
374WOODCHUCK LN
352WOODCHUCK LN
364WOODCHUCK LN
328WOODCHUCK LN340WOODCHUCK LN
314WOODCHUCK LN
304WOODCHUCK LN
290WOODCHUCK LN
275WOODCHUCK LN
583ROUNDHILL RD
218WOODCHUCK LN
210WOODCHUCK LN
200CATHER LN
200WOODCHUCK LN
190WOODCHUCK LN
161WOODCHUCK LN235CATHER LN
775ROUNDHILL RD 158WOODCHUCK LN
180WOODCHUCK LN
221CATHER LN
137WOODCHUCK LN
615ROUNDHILL RD
599ROUNDHILL RD
571ROUNDHILL RD
551ROUNDHILL RD
729ROUNDHILL RD 120WOODCHUCK LN126WOODCHUCK LN 109WOODCHUCK LN
769ROUNDHILL RD 749ROUNDHILL RD759ROUNDHILL RD 739ROUNDHILL RD
745ROUNDHILL RD
622ROUNDHILL RD
134MOUNTVISTA DR 572ROUNDHILL RD
170MOUNTVISTA DR
973ROUNDHILL RD
961ROUNDHILL RD
945ROUNDHILL RD
933ROUNDHILL RD 911ROUNDHILL RD
121PINGLEY LN
684ROUNDHILL RD
123PINGLEY LN
668ROUNDHILL RD
132PINGLEY LN
140SINGHASS RD
953ROUNDHILL RD 873ROUNDHILL RD
837ROUNDHILL RD 789ROUNDHILL RD
799ROUNDHILL RD
110POORHOUSE RD
712ROUNDHILL RD
696ROUNDHILL RD 135PINGLEY LN 164PINGLEY LN 178MOUNTVISTA DR
1035ROUNDHILL RD
995ROUNDHILL RD
844ROUNDHILL RD
105POORHOUSE RD
127POORHOUSE RD
2693NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2691NORTHWESTERNPIKE
163PINGLEY LN
175PINGLEY LN 182PINGLEY LN
189MOUNTVISTA DR
1121ROUNDHILL RD 1059ROUNDHILL RD
1006ROUNDHILL RD 978ROUNDHILL RD
3021NORTHWESTERNPIKE
161TRINITY LN
161TRINITY LN
161TRINITY LN
928ROUNDHILL RD
872ROUNDHILL RD
858ROUNDHILL RD 160POORHOUSE RD
162POORHOUSE RD 119PINGLEY LN 185PINGLEY LN
2633NORTHWESTERNPIKE
1038ROUNDHILL RD
3073NORTHWESTERNPIKE
3015NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2957NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2793NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2755NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2727NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2641NORTHWESTERNPIKE
3111NORTHWESTERNPIKE
3079NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2911NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2835NORTHWESTERNPIKE
BARRACKS LN
SING
H
A
S
S
R
D
PINGLE
Y
L
N
PO
O
R
H
O
U
S
E
R
D
MOUNTVISTA DR
NORTHWESTERNPIKE
C
A
T
H
E
R
L
N
ROUND HILL RD
WOO
D
C
H
U
C
K
L
N
Applications
Parcels
Building Footprints
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: August 21, 2017Staff: tklein
Round Hill ROUND HILL
R
D
SING
H
A
S
S
R
D
WOO
D
C
H
U
C
K
L
N
L
A
Y
C
I
R
0150
CUP # 07 - 17Caroline "Dixie" ScheulenPIN:52 - A - 261 Special Events FacilitiesLocation Map
0 840 1,680420 Feet
CUP # 07 - 17Caroline "Dixie" ScheulenPIN:52 - A - 261Special Events FacilitiesLocation Map
CUP #07-17
CATHER LOTSSubdivision
0150
ST803
ST654
ST803
52 A 261
760WOODCHUCK LN
285FOXMEADOW LN
622WOODCHUCK LN
435WOODCHUCK LN
561WOODCHUCK LN
600WOODCHUCK LN
492WOODCHUCK LN
238CATHER LN
474WOODCHUCK LN
454WOODCHUCK LN
430WOODCHUCK LN
388WOODCHUCK LN404WOODCHUCK LN
374WOODCHUCK LN
352WOODCHUCK LN
364WOODCHUCK LN
328WOODCHUCK LN340WOODCHUCK LN
314WOODCHUCK LN
304WOODCHUCK LN
290WOODCHUCK LN
275WOODCHUCK LN
583ROUNDHILL RD
218WOODCHUCK LN
210WOODCHUCK LN
200CATHER LN
200WOODCHUCK LN
190WOODCHUCK LN
161WOODCHUCK LN235CATHER LN
775ROUNDHILL RD 158WOODCHUCK LN
180WOODCHUCK LN
221CATHER LN
137WOODCHUCK LN
615ROUNDHILL RD
599ROUNDHILL RD
571ROUNDHILL RD
551ROUNDHILL RD
729ROUNDHILL RD 120WOODCHUCK LN126WOODCHUCK LN 109WOODCHUCK LN
769ROUNDHILL RD 749ROUNDHILL RD759ROUNDHILL RD 739ROUNDHILL RD
745ROUNDHILL RD
622ROUNDHILL RD
134MOUNTVISTA DR 572ROUNDHILL RD
170MOUNTVISTA DR
973ROUNDHILL RD
961ROUNDHILL RD
945ROUNDHILL RD
933ROUNDHILL RD 911ROUNDHILL RD
121PINGLEY LN
684ROUNDHILL RD
123PINGLEY LN
668ROUNDHILL RD
132PINGLEY LN
140SINGHASS RD
953ROUNDHILL RD 873ROUNDHILL RD
837ROUNDHILL RD 789ROUNDHILL RD
799ROUNDHILL RD
110POORHOUSE RD
712ROUNDHILL RD
696ROUNDHILL RD 135PINGLEY LN 164PINGLEY LN 178MOUNTVISTA DR
1035ROUNDHILL RD
995ROUNDHILL RD
844ROUNDHILL RD
105POORHOUSE RD
127POORHOUSE RD
2693NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2691NORTHWESTERNPIKE
163PINGLEY LN
175PINGLEY LN 182PINGLEY LN
189MOUNTVISTA DR
1121ROUNDHILL RD 1059ROUNDHILL RD
1006ROUNDHILL RD 978ROUNDHILL RD
3021NORTHWESTERNPIKE
161TRINITY LN
161TRINITY LN
161TRINITY LN
928ROUNDHILL RD
872ROUNDHILL RD
858ROUNDHILL RD 160POORHOUSE RD
162POORHOUSE RD 119PINGLEY LN 185PINGLEY LN
2633NORTHWESTERNPIKE
1038ROUNDHILL RD
3073NORTHWESTERNPIKE
3015NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2957NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2793NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2755NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2727NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2641NORTHWESTERNPIKE
3111NORTHWESTERNPIKE
3079NORTHWESTERNPIKE 2911NORTHWESTERNPIKE
2835NORTHWESTERNPIKE
BARRACKS LN
SING
H
A
S
S
R
D
PINGLE
Y
L
N
PO
O
R
H
O
U
S
E
R
D
MOUNTVISTA DR
NORTHWESTERNPIKE
C
A
T
H
E
R
L
N
ROUND HILL RD
WOO
D
C
H
U
C
K
L
N
Applications
Parcels
Building Footprints
B1 (Neighborhood Business District)
B2 (General Business District)
B3 (Industrial Transition District)
EM (Extractive Manufacturing District)
HE (Higher Education District)
M1 (Light Industrial District)
M2 (Industrial General District)
MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)
MS (Medical Support District)
OM (Office - Manufacturing Park)
R4 (Residential Planned Community District)
R5 (Residential Recreational Community District)
RA (Rural Areas District)
RP (Residential Performance District)
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: August 21, 2017Staff: tklein
Round Hill ROUND HILL
R
D
SING
H
A
S
S
R
D
WOO
D
C
H
U
C
K
L
N
L
A
Y
C
I
R
0150
CUP # 07 - 17Caroline "Dixie" ScheulenPIN:52 - A - 261 Special Events FacilitiesZoning Map
0 840 1,680420 Feet
CUP # 07 - 17Caroline "Dixie" ScheulenPIN:52 - A - 261Special Events FacilitiesZoning Map
CUP #07-17
E
COUNTY of FREDERICK
Department of Planning and Development
540/ 665-5651
Fax: 540/ 665-6395
107 North Kent Street, Suite 202 • Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000
MEMORANDUM
TO: Frederick County Planning Commission
FROM: Candice E. Perkins, AICP, CZA, Assistant Director
DATE: October 23, 2017
RE: Public Meeting: 2017-2022 Capital Improvements Plan (CIP)
The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) is a document that consists of a schedule of major
capital expenditures for the County for the ensuing five-year period, as well as, a category for
long term projects (6 + years out). Staff would note that this update to the CIP has been
modified from its previous version to improve its presentation and utility, and to reflect input
provided by members of the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors.
The plan is intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget.
In addition to determining priorities for capital expenditures, the County must also ensure
that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically, the
projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of
the public, and the policies of the Comprehensive Plan. When the CIP is adopted, it becomes
a component of the Comprehensive Plan. Frederick County approved the 2035
Comprehensive Plan on January 25, 2017.
The inclusion of projects on the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be
undertaking these projects. The CIP is strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital
facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once adopted, project
priorities and cost estimates may change throughout the year based on changing
circumstances. It is also possible that particular projects may not be funded during the year
that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the
further in the future it is projected. The CIP is also updated annually, and projects are
removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. Please note that the
monetary amounts shown within the tables were compiled December 2016-January 2017;
some of these figures may have changed. Updated figures will be gathered during the next
CIP cycle (2018-2023).
CIP Components
The CIP provides project recommendations from various County Agencies and tables that
outline the projects and cost estimates for the projects. Within the tables, columns for each
year show the funding needs that would be requested in the corresponding budget cycle. In
addition, those projects that are long range projects have been placed at the end of the CIP
table, outside of the five-year window.
2017-2022 CIP
October 23, 2017
Page 2
The CIP includes a total of 75 projects, including several new projects. Projects within the
CIP are for: Schools, Parks and Recreation, Regional Library, Transportation, Winchester
Regional Airport, County Administration, and Fire and Rescue.
Background – Discussions
On March 20, 2017, the Comprehensive Plans and Programs Committee (CPPC) met with
County Department and Agency representatives to discuss their individual capital
improvement project requests, including new projects and modifications to previous requests,
associated with the 2017-2018 CIP. The role of the CPPC in the CIP process was to ensure
that the various departmental project requests are in conformance with the County’s
Comprehensive Plan. The evaluation and prioritization of departmental projects was
presented by Frederick County Public Schools, Parks and Recreation, and Staff. Also
provided was a projected cost for each project as required by the Code of Virginia.
Following the CPPC discussion, the Committee endorsed the CIP and endorsed its
conformance with the County’s Comprehensive Plan. The CPPC forwarded the CIP to the
Planning Commission for discussion. The Planning Commission discussed the CIP on April
5, 2017 meeting; at that meeting the Planning Commission stated that the CIP conformed
with the Comprehensive Plan and sent the document forward to the Board of Supervisors.
The Planning Commission held a public hearing for the CIP on September 6, 2017; the CIP
was tabled for 45 days due to the monetary figures within the CIP. Staff has initiated the
update of this information for the upcoming CIP cycle which will be presented to the
Planning Commission at a future date. In the meantime, direction has also been provided to
move the 2017-2022 CIP on to the Board of Supervisors at this time.
Conclusion
It is the role of the Planning Commission to affirm that the projects contain within the 2017-
2022 CIP are in conformance with the 2035 Comprehensive Plan. Staff is seeking a decision
from the Planning Commission on the conformance of the included projects within the 2035
Comprehensive Plan. Following the November 1, 2017 Planning Commission meeting, the
CIP will be scheduled for public hearing at the December 13, 2017 Board of Supervisors
meeting.
Please find attached the Draft 2017-2022 CIP with applicable text, tables and maps. If
adopted, the CIP and included maps will ultimately become a component of the
Comprehensive Plan, which would satisfy the review requirement of Section 15.2 -2232 of
the Code of Virginia, which states that no public facility shall be constructed unless said
facility is a “feature shown” within a jurisdiction’s comprehensive plan.
Please contact the Planning Department should you have any questions regarding this
information.
CEP/pd
Attachments
Adopted by the
Frederick County
Board of Supervisors
TBD, 2017
Recommended by the
Frederick County
Planning Commission
TBD, 2017
FREDERICK COUNTY, VIRGINIA
2017-2022
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION……………………………...……………………………….. 1
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS……………..………..………………….2
Frederick County Public Schools…………………….……... 2
Frederick County Parks and Recreation ..………………. 2
Handley Regional Library .………………….………….……….3
Transportation Committee……………………………………. 3
Winchester Regional Airport………………………….……….4
County Administration .……………………………..…………..4
Fire & Rescue………...……………………………….………………5
2017-2022 CAPITAL PROJECTS MAPS
2017-2022 Capital Projects………………………………………6
2017-2022 Frederick County Public Schools….…….…..7
2017-2022 Parks and Recreation ………………..…..………8
2017-2022 Transportation Projects………………..………..9
CIP TABLE EXPLANATIONS………………………………………….………10
PROJECT FUNDING……………………………………………………………. 10
2017-2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS TABLE….….…11
APPENDIX - PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
Frederick County Public Schools…………………………... 16
Frederick County Parks and Recreation ……………….…21
Handley Regional Library……………………………………….. 31
Transportation Committee……………………………………..33
Winchester Regional Airport………………………………. 40
County Administration……………………………………….. 44
Fire and Rescue……………..……………………………………….48
1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
FREDERICK COUNTY
FY 2017-2022
INTRODUCTION
Section §15.2-2239 of the Code of Virginia assigns the responsibility for preparation of plans for capital outlays to the local Planning
Commissions. The Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) consists of a schedule for major capital expenditures for the County for the
ensuing five years.
The CIP is updated annually. Projects are removed from the plans as they are completed or as priorities change. The plan is
intended to assist the Board of Supervisors in preparation of the County budget. In addition to determining priorities for capital
expenditures, the County must also ensure that projects contained within the CIP conform to the Comprehensive Plan. Specifically,
the projects are reviewed with considerations regarding health, safety, and the general welfare of the public , and the policies of the
Comprehensive Plan. Once the CIP is adopted, it becomes a component of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan and provides a link
between the documents and potential proffered contributions made with future rezoning projects.
The inclusion of projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. The CIP is
strictly advisory; it is intended for use as a capital facilities planning document, not for requesting funding allocations. Once
adopted, project priorities may change throughout the year based on changing circumstances. It is also possible that particu lar
projects may not be funded during the year that is indicated in the CIP. The status of any project becomes increasingly uncertain the
further in the future it is projected.
2
PROJECT RECOMMENDATIONS
Frederick County Public Schools
Frederick County Public Schools continue to commence and complete capital projects that have been priorities from previous years.
The joint top capital improvement priority for the Schools is the construction of the 4th High School. The new high school has been
requested to relieve overcapacity issues at the high school level and in anticipation of projected student population growth.
Additions and renovations to Armel Elementary School is the second highest priority, followed by the construction of the 12 th
Elementary School as the third highest priority. The second and third priorities are in recognition of the anticipated community
growth in these two general locations.
Other schools included for renovation projects include Robert E. Aylor Middle School, Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School, Bass
Hoover Elementary School, and James Wood High School. This year’s CIP also includes requests to improve the parking lot and
construct a softball field at Sherando High School, Route 522 North transportation improvements for the Gainesboro Campus and
plans to renovate and expand the current administration building on Amherst Street.
Parks & Recreation
Swimming improvements continue to be a focus for Parks and Recreation. The indoor aquatic facility continues to be proposed as a
high priority of the Parks and Recreation Department. In recent years this project has been moved up to the De partment’s second
priority in recognition of Frederick County Public Schools 4 th High School land opportunity. The upgrade of pool amenities at the
swimming pools at both parks will include the addition of water slides and a spray ground. This project is expected to increase pool
attendance by 30 percent while providing recreational opportunities for both the Sherando and Clearbrook Park service areas.
The majority of the recommended projects are planned for the County’s two regional parks (Sherando & Clearbrook). However, a
new project, the Frederick Heights Park has been identified in recognition of improvements requested to allow public access to
underutilized park land. Other projects include the Snowden Bridge Park and continued improvements to the Rose Hill Park.
3
The effort of the Parks and Recreation Department and their identification of their comprehensively planned parks including
community, neighborhood, and district parks, further emphasize the connection between the CIP, Comprehensive Plan, and
potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects.
Projects planned for Sherando Park include: upgrade of baseball lighting, upgrade pool amenities, a softball complex, a socce r
complex, maintenance compound and office, skateboard park, parking and multi-purpose fields with trail development, picnic area
with a shelter, and an access road with parking and trails. The projects planned for the Clearbrook Park include, upgrade of baseball
lighting, upgrading pool amenities, a new open play area, a tennis/basketball complex, and shelter with an area for stage seating.
A project that continues to be a high priority for Parks and Recreation is the Abrams Creek Greenway Trail. This facility would
provide recreational opportunities for residents of this corridor along with the surrounding communities and was emphasized in the
Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Areas Plan completed during 2012 . This project will provide trails with bicycle, walking and jogging
opportunities, which ranks #1 in the 2007 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor recreational activities.
Handley Regional Library
The Handley Regional Library recommends three projects. The library’s top priority is a new library branch in the Gainesboro area.
The two remaining projects request that funding be provided for new library branches throughout the County which include the
areas of Senseny/Greenwood Road and Route 522 South, both of which are anticipated to be located within the UDA (Urban
Development Area) in locations consistent with recently approved area plans; the Senseny/Eastern Frederick Area Plan, and the
Southern Frederick Area Plan.
Transportation Committee
The Transportation Committee continues to provide project requests for the CIP. Virginia State Code allows for transportation
projects to be included within a locality's CIP. Funding for transportation project requests will likely come from developer s and
revenue sharing. Implementation of transportation projects does not take away funding for generalized road improvements.
The Transportation Committee has requested funding for 22 projects. The 22 requests include projects that entail widening of major
roads; key extensions of roads that help provide better networks, bicycle and pedestrian improvements, a nd the addition of turn
lanes at current unsafe intersections. The inclusion of the Eastern Road Plan Improvements item once again emphasizes the
4
connection between the CIP and potential proffered contributions made with rezoning projects which are aimed at mitigating
potential transportation impacts identified in the Comprehensive Plan.
The major change to the transportation project list in recent years CIP’s is the classification of the projects into funded and unfunded
priorities.
Winchester Regional Airport
Funding for airport projects is derived through a complex formula where the federal and state governments contribute a majori ty of
the funding, with Frederick County and the other jurisdictions providing the remaining funding.
The construction of a new general aviation terminal to support future airport operations and associated parking improvements
continues to be number one in the CIP, followed by the Fuel Storage Facility. The Airport has recently completed a major
improvement of their runway. With this project moving from the CIP, The Airport Authority is now focusing their CIP efforts on
taxiway improvements and property acquisition in support of airport development to meet Federal Aviation requirements for
general aviation facilities. The vast majority of the funding for these improvements came from the FAA and VDA .
The number of projects that are included in this CIP has been consolidated in recent years as the Airport Authority is further aligning
the County’s CIP with the one provided to the Virginia Department of Aviation.
County Administration
With the potential necessary relocation of the Clearbrook citizen convenience center in the future, the number one priority is a new
facility proposed as a replacement for the current convenience site at another location in the immediate vicinity to the existing
convenience site. The other requests from Public Works are for the expansion/relocation of both the Albin and the Gore Refuse Sites
to allow for a trash compactor, which will reduce operational costs, by compacting trash before it reaches the landfill.
The joint County Administration and School Administration Building that was included in recent CIP’s remains in this year’s project
list along with the future replacement of the Joint Judicial Center.
5
Previously, an item was added to enhance the connection between the CIP and proffered contributions made to mitigate the
impacts of development projects. This item, General Government Capital Expenditures, is an item that addresses those general
government capital expenditures that may fall below the established $100,000 departmental threshold. This is similar to the
approach previously taken for Fire and Rescue Capital Equipment. Fire and Rescue has its own section.
Fire and Rescue
The top project for the Fire and Rescue component remains the creation of Fire & Rescue Station #22 in the vicinity of Route 277,
with the ability to provide an annex facility for other County-related offices. The collaboration of this project with other commu nity
users and a land use planning effort was a key element of the Southern Frederick Land Use Plan. Fire and Rescue has also inc luded a
project which provides for the capital apparatus needs of this facility.
Fire & Rescue has once again requested the creation of Station #23, a new facility located in the vicinity of Crosspointe, and a Fire &
Rescue Regional Training Center. Such a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially consisting of an administrative b uilding,
multi-story burn building, multi-story training tower, vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other training props. This
project will incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial, and educ ational
institutions located within the region.
Fire and Rescue Volunteer Company Capital Equipment Requests
Previously, a project consisting of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services was
established. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement
capital equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment that may fall below the guidelines established by the Finance Commit tee.
It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that this significant capital expense is
identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the benefit of the individual Volunteer
Fire and Rescue Companies. This year’s CIP does contain requests that do meet this guideline.
Individual Fire and Rescue Companies previously identified their own capital requests which have been added to the CIP in a l ump
sum amount. Each of the capital requests meet the $100,000 guideline established by the Finance Committee.
§¨¦81
§¨¦66
§¨¦81
0137
01259
01277
0155
0150
0111
01127
01522
017017
0150
0111
0150
01522
01522
0111
0137
0150
33
3
1
1
2
3
2
4
2
1
1
0 10,000 20,0005,000
Feet02.5 51.25
Miles
V
2017 - 2022Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Plan2017 - 2022Capital ImprovementsSpecific or Approximate Locations
1 Clearbrook Convenience Site2 Albin Convenience Site Expansion3 Gore Convenience Site Expansion
County Administration
Airport
1 Library Branch - Gainesboro2 Library Branch - Senseny & Greenwood3 Library Branch - Rt 522 South
Library
1 Fire & Rescue Station 222 Clearbrook Fire Station Relocation3 Fire & Rescue Station 234 Fire & Rescue Station 24
Fire & R escue
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Elementary School
12th Elementary School,at Snowden Bridge
Middle School
The Willows
Fourth High School
Elementary School
Elementary School
Elementary School
Multi-Use Campus
Villages at Artrip
SHS
MHS
JWHS
FCMS
JWMS
REAMS
ABMS
Buildings & Grounds
Old Transportation Facility
Administration
Senseny Road
Dowell J. Howard
New Transportation Facility
GBES
SWES
RRES
APRES
EES
AES
BHES
MTES
OVES
IHES
GMES
0155
0111
0111
01259
0111
01277
01522
01127
01522
0150
01522
01522
0150
017
015220137
0150
01522
01522
0137
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
Win ches ter
Midd leto wn
Ste phe nsCity
!High Schools
!Middle Schools
!Elementary Schools
!Support FacilitiesPotential School Facility Locations
Potential School LocationsPurchased LandProffered LandPotential ProfferUrban D evelopment AreaSWSA
V
0 2 41 MilesNote:Created by Frederick County Department ofPlanning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests submitted by Frederick County School Board3/8/17
School LocationsAre MostAppropriateWithin the U DA
2017 - 2022Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Plan
Existing and Potential School Locations
[k
[k
§¨¦81
£¤55
£¤50£¤259
£¤522
£¤522
£¤277
£¤522
£¤50
£¤11
£¤37
£¤11
£¤37
§¨¦81
ClearbrookPark
SherandoPark
Rose HillPark
Snowden BridgePark
Frederick HeightsPark
Gore
Armel
Albin
Round Hill
Stephenson
Gainesboro
Shawneeland
Clear Brook
Star Tannery
Cross Junction
Reynolds Store
V
0 1.5 30.75 Miles
Note:Created by Frederick County Department ofPlanning & Development
Map represents the Capital Improvement Requests submitted by The Dept of Parks & Recreation3/8/2017
Proposed Parks
DistrictCommunityNeighborhoodAbrams C reek TrailExisting County Parks
District ParkCommunity Park
[k Neighborhood ParkPublically Accessible Land
FederalStateBattlefieldNon-ProfitLocal ParkTuscarora TrailSchool
!y Public Boat LaunchUrban Development Area
2017 - 2022Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovements Pl anNew Parks/Rec Locations
National Forest
EAST
NE
WEST
Winchester
Stephens City
Middletown
0111
0111
0111
0111
01277
01522
01522
0150
017
0137
01522
0150
0137
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
§¨¦81
Winche ster
Steph ensCity 0 1 20.5 Miles
Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StWinchester, VA 22601www.fcva.us3/8/17
V
2017 - 2022Frederick CountyCapital Imp rovement PlanTransportation Projects
6
6
6
6
2 8
11
18
4
3 5 121615
99
14
14
14
10
2017 - 2022Capital Improvement PlanTransportation Projects
$+17
$+13
$+19
ðñò""307
7
ðñò""310
1 $+20
$+21
Funded Priorities
1. I-81 EXIT 310 IMPROVEMENTSðñò""310
2. ROUTE 277 WID ENING & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 1)
3. EAST TEVIS ST EXTENSION &BRIDGE OVER I-814. RENAISSAN CE DR, PHASE 2
5. SULPHUR SPRINGS RD IMPROVEMENT FROM ROUTE 50 TO LAND FILL
Unfun ded Prio rities
22. EASTERN ROAD PLANIMPROVEMENTS22
21. SENSENY R D; TURN LANES AT CR ESTLEIGH DR$+21
20. PAPERMILL RD; RT TURNLANE EXTENSION AT ROUTE 522$+20
19. ROUTE 277; RT TURN LANE EXTENSION AT WARRIOR DR$+19
18. WARRIOR DR EXTENSIONFROM ROUTE 37
16. IN VERLEE WAY; C ONNECTION FROM SENSENY RD TO ROUTE 50
15. SENSENY R D WIDENIN G
14. ROUTE 11 N OF WINCHESTER WIDENING TO WV LINE
13. BR UCETOWN RD/HOPEWELL RD; ALIGNMENTAND INTERSECTION$+13
12. CHANNING DR EXTENSION TO ROUTE 50
11. WARRIOR DR EXTENSION TO NEW EXIT 307
10. ROUTE 11 N WID ENING FROMSNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD TOOLD C HARLESTOWN RD
9. REDBUD RD & EXIT 307 RAMPREALIGNMENTS
8. ROUTE 277 WID ENING & SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS (PH 2)
7. I-81 EXIT 307 RELOCATIONðñò""307
6. CONTIN UE ROUTE 37 PLANNING & ENGINEERING WOR K
17. FOX DR; INSTALL TURNLANES ONTO ROU TE 522$+17
10
THE CIP TABLES - CONTENT DESCRIPTIONS
The Capital Improvements Plan tables, on the following four pages, contains a list of the capital improvement projects proposed for
the ensuing five years. A description of the information in this table is explained below.
Projects Ranked by Department - The priority rating assigned by each agency or department for their requested projects.
County Contribution - The estimated dollar value that will be contributed for each project. This value is listed by individual fiscal
years and by total contributions over the five-year period. The total contribution column, located to the right of the fiscal year
columns, does not include debt service projections.
Notes - Indicates the footnotes that apply to additional funding sources for particular projects.
Total Project Costs - The cost for each project, including the County allocations and other funding sources.
PROJECT FUNDING
The projects included in Table 1 have a total projected cost to the County of $247,794,039, this figure excludes Airport request and
transportation projects as these are primarily funded through other sources.
While the CIP is primarily used to cover the next five years, much of the project costs have been identified beyond the next five
years.
School projects are funded through a combination of loans from the Virginia Public School Authority and the Virginia
Literary Fund.
Funding for Parks and Recreation Department projects will come from the unreserved fund balance of the County. The
Parks and Recreation Commission actively seeks grants and private sources of funding for projects not funded by the
County.
The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking
these projects. Funding projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds , developer
contributions, and revenue sharing.
Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local governments. The local portion may
include contributions from Frederick, Clarke, Shenandoah, Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester.
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by
Department 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Department
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Beyond Year 6+
Public Schools Please refer to the map identifying future school sites for additional school sites located throughout the County.
Fourth High School $31,000,000 $29,500,000 $21,500,000 $9,400,000 $91,400,000 $91,400,000
Armel Elementary School $5,100,000 $2,900,000 $8,000,000 $8,000,000
Addition and Renovation
Elementary School #12 $20,500,000 $11,900,000 $32,400,000 $32,400,000
Robert E. Aylor Middle School
Addition and Renovation TBD TBD TBD
James Wood High School Upgrades TBD TBD TBD
Sherando High School Parking Lot
& Softball Field Improvements TBD TBD TBD
Route 522 North Super Street at
Gainesboro Campus TBD TBD TBD
Apple Pie Ridge Elementary
Phase 2 Renovation TBD TBD TBD
Bass Hoover Elementary
Phase 2 Renovation TBD TBD TBD
Administration Office TBD TBD TBD
Total $0 $56,600,000 $44,300,000 $21,500,000 $9,400,000 $0 $131,800,000 $131,800,000
Parks & Recreation
Sherando North West Sherando Park $671,000 $671,000 $671,000
Indoor Aquatic Facility $480,000 $10,820,000 $11,300,000 $11,300,000
Frederick Heights Park $197,000 $197,000 $197,000
Clearbrook & Sherando Water Slide/Spray Ground $624,000 $624,000 $624,000
Abrams Creek Greenway Trail $61,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $3,661,000 $3,661,000
Snowden Bridge Park Development $300,000 $4,250,000 $4,550,000 $4,550,000
Rose Hill Playground $100,000 $100,000 $100,000
Sherando Area 4 North Park Development $176,000 $1,473,000 $1,649,000 $1,649,000
Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,300,000
Sherando Area 3 North Park Development $2,121,000 $2,121,000 $2,121,000
Community Park $1,970,000 $1,970,000 $1,970,000
Neighborhood Parks (6)$831,000 $4,155,000 $4,986,000 $4,986,000
District Parks (4)$3,934,000 $7,869,000 $11,803,000 $11,803,000
Community Center
Sherando South Sherando Park Development $2,035,000 $2,035,000 $2,035,000
Fleet Trip Vehicles $9,067,000 $9,067,000 $9,067,000
Sherando Area 1 North Park Development $1,153,000 $1,153,000 $1,153,000
Sherando Area 2 North Park Development $529,000 $529,000 $529,000
Indoor Ice Rink $307,000 $307,000 $307,000
Clearbrook Clearbrook Park Development $524,000 $524,000 $524,000
Total $671,000 $5,359,000 $20,544,000 $14,201,000 $4,917,000 $12,331,000 $524,000 $58,547,000 $58,547,000
Table 1 - 2017-2022 Capital Improvement Plan Requests
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by
Department 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Regional Library
Gainesboro Library $155,023 $1,465,736 $128,275 $1,749,034 $1,749,034
Senseny/Greenwood Library TBD TBD TBD
Route 522 South Library TBD TBD TBD
Total $0 $155,023 $1,465,736 $128,275 $0 $0 $1,749,034 $1,749,034
County Administration
Clearbrook Convenience Site $540,650 $540,650 E $540,650
Albin Convenience Site $30,000 $540,650 $570,650 $570,650
Relocation/Expansion Gore Site $30,000 $358,105 $388,105 $388,105
General Government Capital Expenditures $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000
County/School Board
Administration Building TBD TBD E TBD
Joint Judicial Center TBD
New Facility E $0
Total $200,000 $770,650 $770,650 $558,105 $200,000 $0 $2,499,405 $2,499,405
Fire & Rescue
Fire & Rescue Station #22 (277)$400,000 $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $3,400,000 $3,400,000
F&R Station #22 (277) Apparatus $100,000 $805,000 $905,000 $905,000
Fire & Rescue Station #23 $550,000 $2,150,000 $1,000,000 $3,700,000 $3,700,000
Regional Training Center $75,000 $100,000 $1,250,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 $31,175,000 $31,175,000
Total $0 $1,125,000 $4,555,000 $3,750,000 $10,000,000 $9,500,000 $10,250,000 39,180,000 $39,180,000
Fire & Rescue Company
Capital Requests Fire & Rescue Capital Equipment $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 E $1,000,000
Fire & Rescue Company Requests $13,018,600 $13,018,600 E $13,018,600
including capital equipment requests
Total $871,000 $64,009,673 $71,635,386 $40,137,380 $24,517,000 $21,831,000 $246,794,039 $247,794,039
Other Funding Sources:E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources
TBD= To be Determined
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by Agency 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Beyond
Year 6+
Funded Priorities
I-81 Exit 310 Improvements $49,121,000 $49,121,000 E $49,121,000
Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening
and Safety Improvements (ph 1)$38,000,000 $38,000,000 E $38,000,000
East Tevis Street Extension and
Bridge over 81 $15,000,000 $15,000,000 E $15,000,000
Rennaisance Drive, Phase 2 $5,300,000 $5,300,000 E $5,300,000
Sulpher Springs Road Improvement project $5,000,000 $5,000,000 E $5,000,000
Unfunded Priorities
Route 37 Engineering & Construction $300,000,000 $300,000,000 E $300,000,000
I-81 Exit 307 Relocation $60,000,000 $60,000,000 E $60,000,000
Route 277, Fairfax Pike, Widening
and Safety Improvements (ph 2)$25,500,000 $25,500,000 E $25,500,000
Redbud Road Realignment and
Exit 317 Ramp realignment $11,500,000 $11,500,000 E $11,500,000
Widening of Route 11 North (ph 1)$28,500,000 $28,500,000 E $28,500,000
Warrior Drive Extension (south)$23,200,000 $23,200,000 E $23,200,000
Channing Drive Extension $20,600,000 $20,600,000 E $20,600,000
Brucetown/Hopewell Realign.$3,000,000 $3,000,000 E $3,000,000
Widening of Route 11 North (ph2)$47,800,000 $47,800,000 E $47,800,000
Senseny Road Widening $22,800,000 $22,800,000 E $22,800,000
Inverlee Way $10,200,000 $10,200,000 E $10,200,000
Fox Drive $250,000 $250,000 E $250,000
Warrior Drive Extension (Crosspointe south)$12,000,000 $12,000,000 E $12,000,000
Route 277 right turn extension Warrior Drive $500,000 $500,000 E $500,000
Papermill Road right turn lane extension Route 522 $500,000 $500,000 E $500,000
Senseny Road turn lanes/improvements Crestleigh Drive $2,600,000 $2,600,000 E $2,600,000
Eastern Road Plan Improvements TBD TBD E TBD
Total $112,421,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $568,950,000 $681,371,000 $681,371,000
Other Funding Sources: E= Partial funding anticipated through development & revenue sources
Table 2 - Transportation Projects - CIP Requests
The inclusion of transportation projects to the CIP is in no way an indication that Frederick County will be undertaking these projects. Funding
projects will continue to come from a combination of state and federal funds, developer contributions, and revenue sharing
Contribution Per Fiscal Year
Projects - Ranked by Agency 2017-2018 2018-2019 2019-2020 2020-2021 2021-2022 2022+
Long Range
Comprehensive
Plan Projects
County
Contributions Notes
Total Project
Costs
Ensuing
Fiscal Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5
Beyond
Year 6+
New General Avaiation Terminal $380,000 $3,330,000 A,B $3,710,000
Fuel Storage Facility Design/Construction $1,000,000 A,B $1,000,000
North Side Svc Road $400,000 A,B $400,000
Taxiway "A" Relocation Design/Construction $200,000 $4,650,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $2,300,000 A,B $9,650,000
Land Parcel 64-A-64 $275,000 A,B $275,000
Land Parcel 64-A-60 $275,000 A,B $275,000
Land Parcel 64-A-59 $300,000 A,B $300,000
Land Parcel 64B-A-52 $300,000 A,B $300,000
Total $0 $2,130,000 $8,980,000 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $2,300,000 $0 $15,910,000
A= Partial funding from VA Dept. of Aviation
B= Partial funding from FAA
Table 3 - Winhester Reginal Airport CIP Requests
*Airport projects will be funded by contributions from the federal, state, and local
governments. The local portion may include contributions from Frederick, Clarke,
Shenandoah, and Warren Counties, and the City of Winchester.
15
APPENDIX
PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS
16
Frederick County Public Schools Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Fourth High School
Description: The fourth high school project will serve students grades 9-12, have a program capacity of 1,725 students, and will
address anticipated growth in high school student enrollment in the school division. The site is located at the end of Juste s Drive
behind Admiral Byrd MS. This school is designed for collaborative education, similar to the new Frederick County MS, with a variety
of learning spaces to meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working world.
Capital Cost: $91,400,000
Justification: This project will address expected growth in high school student enrollment in the school division over the next
several years. We project that enrollment in the high schools by the fall of 2020 will be 4,246 students. High school progr am
capacity is currently 4,050 students. To relieve overcro wding in the high schools, we need to construct the fourth high school in
Frederick County to open in that time frame.
Construction Schedule: Construction will take 48 months
PRIORITY 2 - Armel Elementary School Addition and Renovation
Description: Armel ES opened in 1991 and has served continuously as a K-5 elementary school since that time. The school
contains 70,281 square feet and has a program capacity of 590 students. As of October 31, 2016, the school has 606 students. Eight
classrooms will be added to Armel ES, to accommodate the additional growth at Lake Frederick. The existing facility will be updated
as needed and core areas partially renovated to serve the additional students.
Capital Cost: $8,000,000
Justification: Armel Elementary School is in good condition; however, growth in the attendance zone will need to be addressed
through the addition of classrooms to the facility. An attendance rezoning was completed three years ago as part of the
implementation of full-day kindergarten. Addressing the growth issue at Armel was studied as a part of this rezoning. Four areas
were identified to be rezoned to another school to offset the additional growth at Lake Frederick. None of the four options provided
a complete and satisfactory solution. One option would have put Armel outside of its own attendance zone. A second would have
split a neighborhood and sent some of the neighborhood to a school further away. A third would have simply relocated the gro wth
issue to another school. The fourth option was adopted, but only moved ~50 students, a temporary reprieve from growth pressures.
Construction Schedule: 30 months
17
PRIORITY 3 - New 12th Elementary School
Description: The 12th ES will have a floor area of approximately 100,000 square feet and will be located in Snowden Bridge. The
facility will be designed to accommodate a student membership of 600.
Capital Cost: $32,400,000
Justification: The 12th ES project will address anticipated growth in student enrollment in the school division in ge neral and in the
Stonewall and Redbud Run Elementary School attendance zones in specific over the next several years.
Construction Schedule: 30 months
PRIORITY 4 - Robert E. Aylor Middle School Addition and Renovation
Description: Robert E. Aylor Middle School opened in 1969 as a junior high. The school contains 113,643 square feet and has a
program capacity of 850 students serving grades 6 -8. The building is in acceptable condition; however, several major areas need to
be addressed in a renovation. Major areas of this renovation project include the following: reorganization and addition of
classroom and storage space to better equip the building to support collaborative education, complete replacement of fire ala rm
and communication systems, upgrade of electrical and plumbing, and complete replacement of mechanical systems. Other areas to
be addressed are security and reorganization of asphalted areas.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: Robert E. Aylor Middle School is 47 years old and renovations are needed to a number of areas to ensure the
economical and efficient operation of the school for years to come. The school was constructed as a junior high, where the s chool
was arranged by department. Modern instruction requires that the school be arrang ed by grade and that a variety of learning
spaces be provided (classroom, low intensity labs, high intensity labs, small collaborative spaces, large collaborative space s, etc.) to
meet the needs of a variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working world.
Construction Schedule: 48 Months
PRIORITY 5 - James Wood High School Upgrades
Description: James Wood High School opened in 1980 and has served as a high school since that time. The school contains 234,095
square feet and has a program capacity of 1,400 students. Currently, the building serves grades 9 -12. The building is in good
condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed in a renovation. Major areas to be included in this renovation project
18
are increased electrical service and distribution to support technology, technology cabling, hardware and its installation, upgrade of
plumbing and mechanical systems, and modification of instructional areas to support modern instructional delivery.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: James Wood High School is 36 years old. Renovations and technological upgrades are needed to a number of areas to
ensure effective, economical, and efficient operation of the school for years to come. This school will be renovated to be m ore like
the 4th HS, the new Frederick County MS, and the renovated Aylor MS, with a variety of learning spaces to meet the needs of a
variety of learning styles and to impart skills necessary in today’s working world.
Construction Schedule: 36 Months
PRIORITY 6 - Sherando High School Parking Lot and Softball Field Improvements
Description: This project is being undertaken to address several traffic safety concerns identified over the years at Sherando High
School and to address equity issues (there is no softball field at SHS). Two studies of the site have been conducted, and a master
plan created. Concerns exist for pedestrians, school buses, student drivers, parents, and staff. Rearrangement of the site and the
flow of traffic on the site are necessary to address these needs.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: This is a two-part project. For transportation safety, concerns exist on the school site at Sherando High School during
arrival and dismissal. The students, many of their parents, and the staff necessary to serve them are exposed to these safety
concerns on a daily basis. The flow of traffic at arrival is so slow that at times vehicles on Route 277 back up past Double Church
Road. For the softball field, SHS does not have a softball field on site, instead using a softball field in neighboring Sherando Park.
This represents an equity issue between boys and girls sports and is contrary to FCPS’ standpoint of equity between boys and girls
sports.
Construction Schedule: 30 Months
PRIORITY 7 - Route 522 North Super Street at Gainesboro Campus
Description: The entrance off of Route 522 serves both Frederick County Middle School and Gainesboro Elementary School. As
part of the design of FCMS, both a Traffic Impact Assessment and a Signal Warrant w ere prepared. The conclusion of the Signal
Warrant was that the intersection met one warrant. However, VDOT requires that intersections meet two warrants in order to
qualify for a traffic signal. This project is to provide a solution other than a traffi c signal to address safety concerns. The exact form
of that solution is still undecided.
19
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: Although the Signal Warrant concluded that the intersection does not qualify for a traffic signal, safety concerns still
continue. Visibility over the hill crest northbound is limited. The crossover is narrower than a bus is long, and visibility for left
turners who are located in the crossover is nil when a large vehicle is in the northbound left turn lane.
Construction Schedule: 24 Months
PRIORITY 8 - Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School Phase 2 Renovation
Description: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School opened in 1974 and has served continuously as an elementary school since that
time. The school contains 65,120 square feet and has a program capacity of 528 students. Currently, the building serves grades K-5.
The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to be addressed, including open classroom space, ADA
compliance, energy conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: Apple Pie Ridge Elementary School is 42 years old and renovation is needed to a number of areas to ensure the
economical and efficient operations of the school for years to come.
Construction Schedule: 36 months
PRIORITY 9 - Bass-Hoover Elementary School Phase 2 Renovations
Description: Bass-Hoover Elementary School opened in 1975. The school contains 70,569 square feet and has a program capacity
of 656 students. Currently, the building serves grades K-5. The building is in good condition; however, several major areas need to
be addressed. Renovations will address several major issues, including open classroom space, ADA compliance, energy
conservation, security, and upgrades of fire alarm, electrical, plumbing, and mechanical systems. A building addition, Phase 1, has
been done to maintain program capacity and prepare the building for full-day kindergarten.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: Bass-Hoover Elementary School is 41 years old and renovation is needed to a number of areas to ensure the effective,
economical, and efficient operations of the school for years to come.
Construction Schedule: 36 months
20
PRIORITY 10 - Administrative Office
Description: Frederick County Public Schools’ administration has been located at the old Kline Elementary School building since
1983. Before the building was converted to offices, it had served as a school since 1961. The facility contains 27,992 squa re feet,
including the 5,000 square foot Annex and the 2,400 square foot Finance Addition, but not including the four modular classroom
units that are used for offices and work space.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The 55 year old Administrative Offices building does not have enough office and meeting space, needs technology
upgrades, and improvements to the mechanical, plumbing and electrical systems to meet modern code. Meeting space is at a
premium, as we have only 2 sizeable meeting rooms. There are also building security and asbestos issues. Existing issues will
become more pressing and new issues will appear as the district (and therefore the staff) grows.
Construction Schedule: 30 months
21
Parks & Recreation Department Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - North West Sherando Park Development
Description: This project involves the development of an Access Road, Parking, Shelter, Restroom, Playground, and Open Play Field
in the North West area of Sherando Park, off Warrior Drive. Improvements to include: Entrance and access road (335 lf) off Warrior
Drive, 46 paved parking spaces, adult fitness park, restrooms, shelter and playground.
Capital Cost: $671,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Sherando Park service area and the entire Frederick
County community. This project will provide access to new recreation amenities trails with walking and jogging opportunities.
Walking and jogging rank #1 in the 2011 Virginia Outdoors Plan survey and 2012 Parks and Recreation Community Survey for all
outdoor recreational activities. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frede rick
County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, offers the best location for
this development. This project, being located at Sherando Park, is necessary to meet the needs of our service area.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 2 - Indoor Aquatic Facility – Competitive/Training Pool
Description: The Parks and Recreation Commission has engaged in conversation with FCPS to site the facility at the 4 th High School
campus. Land on the site has been set aside for this purpose. The approximately 35,000sf building will likely house a 10 lane
competitive pool, 6 lane warm water teaching pool, meeting rooms, shower and changing rooms, and facilities support areas. The
above facility would meet the swimming needs of the community, including HS level swim teams.
Capital Cost: $11,300,000
Justification: There are no public indoor public pools in Frederick County. By constructing the indoor pool, it would permit the
department to meet competition needs, instructional needs, citizen programming provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the
community. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and
Recreation Community Survey. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will prov ide a
facility to offer competitive scholastic programs and year round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick Coun ty.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19.
22
PRIORITY 3 - Frederick Heights Park
Description: Development to include entrance, 14 space parking lot and a ½ mile paved shared use path.
Capital Cost: $197,000
Justification: This project will allow public access to an underutilized Frederick County park. Providing a walking trail in the Redbud
District this project will address the #1 identified public recreation need – multi-use trails. This facility would be open and available
to all area residents.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18.
PRIORITY 4 - Water Slide Spray Ground
Description: Upgrade the outdoor swimming pools at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks. Upgrade would involve the removal of
the diving boards and the installation of one 50' water slide and one 75' water slide at each pool. The upgrade would also i nclude
the addition of a spray ground with 10-12 features at each pool.
Capital Cost: $624,000
Justification: To provide recreational opportunities for the Clearbrook Park and Sherando Park service area. Frederick County Parks
and Recreation Department operates two outdoor swimming pools at the regional parks. These facilities are over 20 years old and
were constructed with two diving boards as the main feature for each pool. Swimming pool attendance has trended decline in
recent years and users are requesting different water features. The addition of two water slides and a spray ground to each pool
facility will appeal to families and younger children, increasing pool attendance by an estimated 30%. With the increase in
attendance and potentially fees to comparable facilities, the County could realize an additional $24,000 in revenue annually.
Clearbrook and Sherando Parks, currently owned by Frederick County, offer the best site and location for the development of t his
facility. With the upgrade to the existing swimming pool facilities, the County would not have to incur costs for property acquisition
or infrastructure development and increase the recreational opportunities at the regional parks.
Construction Schedule: FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 5 - Abrams Creek Greenway Trail
Description: 10’ wide asphalt multi-use bicycle/pedestrian trail along Abrams Creek from Senseny Road to Channing Drive. It is
estimated that the trail will have (6) three bridges (stream crossings) and will be approximately 2.6 miles in length. As ou tlined in
23
this form, the project is divided into 3 phases. Phase 1 from Senseny Road to Woodstock Lane. Phase 2 from Woodstock Lane to
Woody’s Place, and Phase 3 from Woody’s Place to Channing Drive.
Capital Cost: $3,661,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for residents of this corridor along with the surrounding
communities. This project will provide trails with bicycle, walking and joggings opportunities, which ranks #1 in the 2007 Virginia
Outdoors Plan survey for all outdoor re creational activities. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as
identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 6 - Snowden Bridge Park Development
Description: Snowden Bridge Park, situated on land proffered by the Snowden Bridge development utilizes park and school land for
the provision of an active recreation park.
The above park is to include three (3) baseball fields suitable for little leag ue play. Lighting, restroom and parking are part of the
park concept.
Capital Cost: $4,500,000
Justification: The overall park design is informed by the Snowden Bridge (formerly Stephenson Village) rezoning proffer of 2003.
The proffer indicates the provided land to be used for baseball and/or soccer field development in anticipation of the population
increase generated by the development.
The Parks and Recreation Commission adopted a site plan for the property in 2015 showing parking and three (3) ba seball fields.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 7 - Rose Hill Park Playground
Description: The Rose Hill Park playground is part of the development vision, and the last capital items to finish the Rose Hill Park
project. It is intended to provide a challenging play area for youth while remaining sensitive in design to the historic nature of the
property.
Capital Cost: $100,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the Rose Hill Park service are a and the entire Frederick
County community. This project is intended to fulfil the County’s agreement with the Glass Glen Burnie Museum (Museum of the
24
Shenandoah Valley) in the development vision for the park. The playground will meet the needs of the c ommunity as identified in
the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18.
PRIORITY 8 - Sherando Park North – Area 4 Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for the SE area of Sherando Park located north of Route 277. This
vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are softball fields to complete the complex , a
shared use trail segment, roadway and parking.
Capital Cost: $1,620,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. Presently, there are ten softball/baseball fields within the
County’s regional park system. Eight of ten existing fields must serve a dual purpose of facilitating youth baseball as well as youth
and adult softball programs. With the increased usage of these fields, it has become mor e difficult to facilitate these programs. This
project is needed in order for the Parks and Recreation Department to accommodate the existing demand of youth baseball and
adult softball programs. This project is intended to meet the needs of the communit y as identified in the 2012 Frederick County
Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Sherando Park, currently owned by Frederick County, represents the very best site for
softball field development. The fact that the County will not have to acquire proper ty for this facility means that the most costly
aspect of this development has already been completed. Sherando Park also provides a location that is situated in the fastes t
growing area of the County and is adjacent to Sherando High School. Joint use of facilities between the park and school system has
facilitated school activities and recreation programs.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 9 - Baseball Field Lighting Upgrade
Description: Upgrade the ballfield lighting at both Clearbrook and Sherando Parks Baseball facilities. The upgrade would involve the
removal of the 30/20 FC (footcandle) level fixtures, lamps, and wood poles and replace with 50/30 FC (footcandle) level fixtu res,
lamps and steel poles on (4) four fields at Clearbrook Park and (4) four fields at Sherando Park. This upgrade is required by Little
League International on all little league fields.
Capital Cost: $1,300,000
25
Justification: The Parks and Recreation Commission is recommending the ballfield light syst em be upgraded to achieve the
recommended 50/30 footcandle level lighting on the playing surface. This will facilitate the provision of recreational oppor tunities
at Sherando and Clearbrook parks for the service areas which include all Frederick County re sidents. The field light fixtures are over
twenty-five years old and are affixed to poles, the majority being over thirty-five years old.
Construction Schedule: FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 10 - Sherando Park North – Area 3 Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for the SW area of Sherando Park located north of Route 277. This
vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are rectangular play fields, a shared use t rail
segment, roadway and parking, playground, restroom, and maintenance building.
Capital Cost: $2,120,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. With the development of Area 4 (CIP item #8) two
rectangular play fields will be displaced. The development of area 3 not only addresses this direct result, but also address es
additional identified needs of the community.
Construction Schedule: FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 11 - Community Park
Description: The Community Park project includes the acquisition of approximately thirty-five acres. Developed amenities will
ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical development would include:
Acquisition of Parkland (35 acres)
Paved & Gravel Paths
Playground
Tot lot
Shelters
Lighted Basketball & Tennis courts
Open Play Fields
Toilets
Parking
26
Shade Trees & Turf
Capital Cost: $1,970,000
Justification: This project would be used by the entire Frederick County area. To reduce the gap between the amount of existing
parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the 2007
Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County
Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located close to population density, east of
Winchester, Redbud / Shawnee District area. The location of this project would provide developed parkland to create more
accessible recreational facilities and opportunities to the residents Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: FY 19-20.
PRIORITY 12 – Neighborhood Parks
Description: The Neighborhood project includes the acquisition of three sites of approximately ten acres and the subsequent
development of these sites. Developed amenities will ultimately be determined by the specific site, however typical developm ent
would include:
Acquisition of Parkland (10 acres per site)
Paved Path
Playground
Shelter
Hard Surface Courts
Open Play Fields
Parking
Capital Cost: $2,495,000
Justification: This project would be used by the entire Frederick County area. To reduce the gap between the amount of existing
parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the 2007
Virginia Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2 012 Frederick County
Parks and Recreation Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in the Urban Development Area or Rural
27
Community Centers. The location of this project would provide parkland developed to create more accessible recreational facilities
and opportunities to the residents of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19.
PRIORITY 13 – District Parks
Description: Acquisition of Parkland:
Northeastern Frederick County 150-200 acres
Western Frederick County 150-200 acres
Eastern Frederick County 150-200 acres
Capital Cost: $9,067,000
Justification: This project would be used by the entire Frederick County area. To reduce the gap between the amount of existing
parkland and the amount of parkland needed to meet the minimum standard for our service area, as recommended by the Virginia
Outdoors Plan. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and
Recreation Community Survey. Potential acreage for parkland would be located in all parts of Frederick County. The location of this
project would provide parkland which could be developed to create more accessible recreational facilities and opportunities t o the
residents of Frederick County.
Construction Schedule: Land acquisition FY 20/21 with the remainder beyond FY 22.
PRIORITY 14 – Community Center
Description: The Field House project would be approximately 44,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to
accommodate a 1/16 mile track and a minimum of two basketball courts. This court area would also be designed for utilization by
indoor soccer, baseball, softball, wrestling, volleyball, tennis and badminton with the installation of in -floor sleeves and drop
curtains or partitions. This area could also be used for special events such as dances, proms, music festivals, garden and home,
outdoor, craft, antique, quilt, or boat shows, thus providing a flexible facility for a multitude of activities to take place at one time.
The facility would also house a fitness center, multi-purpose rooms, office, storage, and locker rooms.
Capital Cost: $9,067,000
Justification: Since its inception, the Parks and Recreation Department has relied significantly on the use of the county public
schools to house recreation programs. This arrangement was adequate when the department first started out, however the
28
department currently offers over 250 sections of programs, creating a situation where the department is limited in its abilit y to meet
the programming and facility needs of the County residents. A Community Center facility will facilitate the department to meet
citizen programming demands and provide the area with a facility to attract new businesses to the community. This facili ty would
be available to all area residents and is intended to meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick Cou nty
Parks and Recreation Community Survey. The Department and the community has benefitted from the co -location of recreation and
school facilities, however community size warrants a separate facility dedicated to recreation use. The construction of this project
will provide a facility the Department will be able to offer year round recreational programming to the residents of Frederick County.
This facility could be built in conjunction with or as an attachment to the Indoor Aquatic Facility.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21.
PRIORITY 15 - Sherando Park North – Area 3 Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for the area of Sherando Park located south of Route 277. This vision
is expressed in the 2002 Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are rectangular play fields, skate park, roadway and par king,
and restroom.
Capital Cost: $2,035,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22.
PRIORITY 16 - Fleet Trip Vehicles
Description: The Parks and Recreation Department needs to upgrade the current vehicle fleet to offer a comprehensive package of
trips for Frederick County citizen’s recreation needs. The addition of the below vehicles would replace the current 1994 bus and
1999 van. These are necessary to adequately offer trip packages and provide reliable transportation for program participants. Bus #1
– 40-50 Passenger Bus, Bus #2 – 30-40 Passenger Bus, Van #1 – 12 Passenger Van.
Capital Cost: $307,000
Justification: To offer a comprehensive package of trips where the population of Frederick County could begin to rely on the Parks
and Recreation Department to meet their trip needs.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21-22.
29
PRIORITY 17 – Sherando Park North – Area 1 Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for the NW area of Sherando Park located north of Route 277. This
vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are multi-use trail, mountain bike trails,
restrooms, pavilions, bike pump track, dog parks, roadway and parking.
Capital Cost: $2,414,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. In addition to its use as a
recreational facility, it will be used by the Frederick County school system. This project is intended to meet the needs of the
community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Comm unity Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY - long term planning item.
PRIORITY 18 – Sherando Park North – Area 2 Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for the NE area of Sherando Park located north of Route 277. This
vision is expressed in the 2016 North Sherando Park Master Plan update. Included are multi -use trail, mountain bike trails,
restrooms, pavilions, roadway and parking.
Capital Cost: $2,273,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area. This project is intended to
meet the needs of the community as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey.
Construction Schedule: FY - long term planning item.
PRIORITY 19 - Indoor Ice Rink
Description: The Ice Rink project would be approximately 40,000 square feet and include an indoor area large enough to
accommodate a single 200’ x 85’ ice rink, locker rooms, party/meeting rooms, and concession area and would need approxi mately
10 acres to construct. This facility should be located on property owned or proffered to the County. The ice rink may be co -located
with other compatible uses should opportunities arise, reducing the acreage demand.
Capital Cost: $6,180,000
Justification: There are no public indoor ice rinks in Frederick County and county residents currently must travel over one hour to
use an indoor ice facility. By constructing the indoor ice rink, it would permit the department to meet competition needs,
instructional needs, citizen programming and leisure demands as well as provide a nucleus to attract new businesses to the
30
community. This facility would be available to all area residents. The construction of this project will provide a facility to offer year
round recreational programming for the residents of Frederick County. This project is intended to meet the needs of the community
as identified in the 2012 Frederick County Parks and Recreation Community Survey. The Indoor Ice Rink facility should be located in
an area convenient to the major transportation corridors of the County. However, as an alternative, one of the two county regional
parks could be used to house the facility, since these locations are already identified as centers for recreation p rograms and
activities.
Construction Schedule: FY - long range capital project.
PRIORITY 20 – Clearbrook Park Development
Description: This project completes the development vision for Clearbrook Park. This vision is expressed in the 1987 Clearbrook
Park Master Plan. Included are; Croquet, shuffleboard, volleyball, updating concession, parking shelter renovation, tennis co urts,
basketball courts, shelter, shelter/stage, lake renovation, and associated landscaping.
Capital Cost: $1,559,000
Justification: This facility would provide recreational opportunities for the entire Frederick County area.
Construction Schedule: FY - long range planning objective.
31
Handley Regional Library Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Northern Frederick County – Gainesboro Library Branch
Description: Construction of a 4,000 to 5,000 square foot branch library, either as a stand -alone facility or co-located with a
planned Frederick County facility (e.g. the new middle school). Initial parking should be for at least 50 vehi cles. The proposed
location would be on Rt. 522 in the Gainesboro District, but this could change depending on patterns of library use and on whether
donated land could be located or if co-located with a Frederick County project already in the early planning stage. This projected
branch would fit per discussions with FCPS on existing property and was outlined in a document prepared by FCPS students two
years ago.
Capital Cost: $1,749,034
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. In 2014-2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages
checked out 471,957 items. 41,034 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 63.7 % of all materials checked out
of the regional system. 2,956 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2015 -
2016. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 52.8 % of the total hav e
library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. This population
group in the Gainesboro District is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming
for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for
homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply compute r
access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications
and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 21/22
PRIORITY 2 - Frederick County Library Branch – Senseny/Greenwood
Description: Construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 15,000 square feet. Initial park ing should be
for a minimum of 65 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dependent on future development. The first
step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 5 to 8 acres.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. In 2014-2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages
checked out 471,957 items. 41,034 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 63.7 % of all materials checked out
32
of the regional system. 2,956 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2015 -
2016. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 52.8 % of the total hav e
library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. This population
group in the Redbud/Shawnee District is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and
programming for citizens from toddlers to senior citizen s. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime
source for homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will sup ply
computer access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office
applications and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 3 - Frederick County Library Branch - Route 522 South
Description: Construction of a 7,000 sq.ft. branch library with expansion possible to 10,000 square feet. Initial parking should be
for a minimum of 35 vehicles. The proposed location is yet to be determined and is dep endent on future development. The first
step of the project would be the acquisition of the land of 3 to 4 acre or collocated with the new High School projected to b e built in
the same area.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: This branch would serve citizens living in this growing area. In 2014-2015 Frederick County citizens of all ages
checked out 471,957 items. 41,034 Frederick County residents have library cards and averaged 63.7 % of all materials checked out
of the regional system. 2,956 Frederick County residents, adults and children, registered for library cards for the first time in 2015 -
2016. Of Frederick County residents over five years of age (when you can get a library card), approximately 52.8 % of the total hav e
library cards. This new branch would bring the level of library usage up closer to the national average level of 58%. This population
group in the Opequon District is not close to a library in the regional system. The Library will provide materials and programming
for citizens from toddlers to senior citizens. It will provide recreational and educational materials. It will be a prime source for
homework help since it will be open nights and on weekends when school libraries are closed. The library will supply compute r
access via Wi-Fi, rental tablets and hotspots, via desktop/laptop computers for word processing, as well as other office applications
and for Internet usage. There will be a meeting room of 425 square feet in which area groups can meet.
Construction Schedule: TBD
33
Transportation Committee Project Priority List
Funded Priorities
PRIORITY 1 - Interstate 81, Exit 310 Improvements
Description: Construct improvements to Exit 310 interchange.
Capital Cost: $49,121,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address
coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 2 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 1)
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Sherando Park. Project would include
realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive.
Capital Cost: $38,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address
development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 3 - East Tevis Street Extension and Bridge over I-81
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 522 and going west approximately 0.2 miles to connect to the
road network being constructed by the Russell 150 Development. Project includes bridge over Interstate 81.
Capital Cost: $15,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will addres s congestion in many areas of the County and address
development to the surrounding area. The location is as identified by joint planning efforts between the County, VDOT, and the
developer.
Construction Schedule: TBD
34
PRIORITY 4 - Renaissance Drive, Phase 2
Description: Construct a connector road and Railroad Crossing between Route 11 and Shady Elm Drive.
Capital Cost: $5,300,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at key points along Route 11 and Apple Valley
Drive. This project is identified in Secondary Road Improvements Plan.
Construction Schedule: Entering design phase, expected to go to bid by Spring 2018.
PRIORITY 5 - Sulphur Springs Road Intersection improvement and widening from Route 50 to the Landf ill
Description: Widen Sulphur Spring Road from the intersection with Route 50 to the regional landfill, add paved shoulders for
pedestrians and bicycles, improve the intersection at Route 50.
Capital Cost: $5,000,000
Justification: This project will address capacity and safety improvements to the corridor. This project is identified in Secondary
Road Improvements Plan.
Construction Schedule: Entering design and right-of- way underway.
Unfunded Priorities
PRIORITY 6 - Planning, Engineering, Right-of-Way and Construction Work for Route 37
Description: This project would be to continue work on the Eastern Route 37 extension. More specifically, to update the
Environmental Impact Statement to the point of a new Record of Decision and to update the 1992 d esign plans to address the
current alignment, engineering guidelines, and possible interchange improvements. In addition, this allows for advanced
engineering, right-of-way purchase and construction.
Capital Cost: $300,000,000 +
Justification: This project moves the County closer to completion of a transportation improvement that would benefit the entire
County and surrounding localities.
Construction Schedule: TBD
35
PRIORITY 7 - Interstate 81, Exit 307 Relocation
Description: Construct a relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost: $60,000,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in many areas of the County and address
coming development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 8 - Route 277 Widening and Safety Improvements (Ph 2)
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at I-81 and continuing to Sherando Park. Project would include
realignment of Aylor Road to align with Stickley Drive.
Capital Cost: $25,500,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address
development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 9 - Redbud Road Realignment and Exit 317 Ramp Realignment
Description: Realign Redbud Road from its current location through development land in the vicinity of Route 11 north and Snowden
Bridge Boulevard and Relocate the I-81 Exit 317 NB ramp to the current location of the Redbud Road/Route 11 interse ction.
Capital Cost: $11,500,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. This project is
identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 10 - Route 11 North Widening to 6 Lanes from Snowden Bridge Boulevard to Old Charlestown Road
Description: Route 11 North of Snowden Bridge Boulevard is currently primarily a two lane roadway. This project would widen that
facility to a 6 lane divided roadway with turn lanes where appropriate.
Capital Cost: $28,500,000
36
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will provide a significant capacity upgrade to address congestion on the
Route 11 Corridor. This project is identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 11 - Warrior Drive Extension
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Route 277 where Warrior Drive intersects from the north and
continuing that roadway south and west to intersect with I-81 at the location of the relocated Exit 307 interchange.
Capital Cost: $23,200,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion in the Southern Frederick area and address
development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 12 - Channing Drive Extension
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road where Channing Drive intersects from the north and
continuing that roadway south to intersect with Route 50 East at Independence Drive.
Capital Cost: $20,600,000
Justification: This project has been identified in the Eastern Road Plan, and will address congestion in Eastern Frederick County and
address development to the surrounding areas.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 13 - Brucetown Road/Hopewell Road Alignment and Intersection Improvements
Description: Realign Brucetown Road to meet Hopewell Road at Route 11. Improvements to this intersection will address
comprehensive planned development’s traffic generation in the area.
Capital Cost: $3,000,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on the Route 11 corridor. The location is
identified by joint planning efforts between the County and VDOT.
Construction Schedule: TBD
37
PRIORITY 14 - Widening of Route 11 North to the West Virginia State Line
Description: Improve Route 11 to a divided 4 and 6-lane facility as detailed in the Eastern Road Plan.
Capital Cost: $47,800,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion over a large area of the County and
address development to the surrounding area. This project improves the safety for the traveling public by reducing congestion and
improving the flow of traffic.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 15 - Senseny Road Widening
Description: Widen Senseny Road to a 4-lane divided roadway. This project is not dependent upon, but is being coordinated with
the implementation of Route 37, Channing Drive, and development in th e area.
Capital Cost: $22,800,000
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will have significant impact on Eastern Frederick County. This project is
identified in the adopted Eastern Road Plan.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 16 - Inverlee Way
Description: Construct a 4-lane divided roadway beginning at Senseny Road and going south to Route 50 East. This project is being
planned in conjunction with improvements to Senseny Road and surrounding development.
Capital Cost: $10,200,000
Justification: This is a regional transportation improvement that will address congestion and provide an additional needed link
between Senseny Road and Route 50 East.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 17 - Fox Drive
Description: Add additional turning lane(s) to Fox Drive where it intersects with Route 522 North.
Capital Cost: $250,000
38
Justification: This is a transportation improvement that will address congestion at this intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 18 - Warrior Drive Extension from Route 37 Crosspointe south to existing terminus
Description: 4 lane roadway from the Route 37 extension in the Crosspoint Development south to the existing terminus of Warrior
Drive.
Capital Cost: $12,000,000
Justification: This improvement would be concurrent with a Route 37 extension and would provide significant congestion relieve at
Exit 307 as well as Tasker Road at Exit 310
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 19 - Route 277 right turn lane extension at Warrior Drive
Description: Extend right turn lane for eastbound 277 at the intersection of Rt 277 and Warrior Drive. Installation of sidewalk for
pedestrian safety and installation of pedestrian pedestal.
Capital Cost: $500,000
Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 20 - Papermill Road right turn lane extension at Route 522
Description: Extend right turn bay of Papermill Road (Route 644) where it intersects with Route 522 to alleviate turn bay spillover
that is taking place.
Capital Cost: $500,000
Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 21 - Senseny Road Turn lanes at the intersection of Senseny Road and Crestleigh Dri ve
39
Description: Improvements to the intersection of Senseny Road (657) and Crestleigh Drive to include turn lanes and potential
signalization. This project would add left and right turn lanes to Senseny Road at the intersection of Crestleigh and potenti ally a full
signalization of the intersection.
Capital Cost: $2,600,000
Justification: This improvement would be a significant safety upgrade to this intersection.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 22 - Frederick County Eastern Road Plan
Description: This project is intended to address all of the planned transportation improvements in the County Comprehensive Plan,
Eastern Road Plan that are not noted individually above.
Capital Cost: $TBD
Justification: This project prepares the County for future development by addressing the projects needed to support that
development in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Construction Schedule: N/A
40
Winchester Regional Airport Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - New General Aviation Terminal Building, Site Work and Parking Lot - Design/Build
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport proposes to construct a new general aviation terminal building. The new facility will
be constructed in a new location slightly south of the existing terminal building.
Capital Cost: $3,710,000
Justification: Since its opening in the early 1990s, the general aviation terminal building for the Winchester Regional Airport has
had only limited interior work completed. Interior repairs are necessary due to extensive usage and some damage from water
leaking from the roof prior to its replacement in the spring of 2006 by necessity. The heating and cooling systems are approaching
25 years in age and are nearing the end of their useful life. The exterior of the terminal building is made from Drivet that has failed
in many areas and is generally in fair to poor condition. In addition, the windows are not energy efficient and several of t he window
seals have failed. In 2008, a study was completed to examine needs and costs to renov ate the existing terminal building. After
review of the study, the WRAA determined it would be more economical to build a new energy efficient building slightly east o f the
existing terminal. The proposed location of the project will allow enough room to build out a new transient apron during the taxiway
relocation project.
Construction Schedule: TBD - scheduled depending on availability of State funding program.
PRIORITY 2 - Fuel Storage Facility
Description: Construct new fuel storage facility for expansion and to meet DEQ and EPA requirements.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: When the taxiway “A” midfield section is relocated it will cause an encroachment into the current fuel farm site. The
current site does not allow for future expansion or upgrades to meet DEQ and/or EPA regulations.
Construction Schedule: TBD - Start of project is dependent upon FAA and/or Virginia Department of Aviation funding program.
PRIORITY 3 - Northside Service Road
Description: This project proposes to construct a two lane service road around the end of Runway 14. The road will be
approximately 1/2 to 3/4 miles in length so that vehicles stay clear of navigational aid critical areas. It is proposed that the road will
be 2 lanes.
41
Capital Cost: $400,000
Justification: The approved airport layout plan shows new development occurring on the northside of the runway. By having
aircraft ground operations and storage on both sides of the airfield (north and south), ground vehicle traffic requiring access to both
sides of the airfield will be generated. The traffic will include fueling truck operations and personnel activities for general
maintenance. The FAA encourages the construction of service roads around aircraft activity areas, especially the runways, to prevent
unauthorized ground vehicle access to aircraft movement areas and to promote a safer operating environment. The service road,
located on the west side of the airport (Runway 14 end) will accomplish these goals.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 4 - Taxiway (A) Relocation
Description: The relocation of Taxiway "A" is part of the overall Airport upgrade to meet safety design standards for a Group III
airport. This relocation will improve the serviceability and safety of the airport in regards to ground operations for larger jet aircraft.
Due to the complex task of relocating the entire 5,500' taxiway, the project has been broken down into two phases - Phase I will
begin at the 32 approach end of the runway and continue to the terminal build ing located midfield. Phase II will continue from the
terminal building to the approach end of runway 14. The project will be broken down into sections within the phases based on
pavement conditions, demand and availability of funding from the Federal Av iation Administration.
Capital Cost: $9,650,000
Justification: The relocation of Taxiway A is necessary to increase the Airport’s ability to accommodate larger aircraft. This project
also will improve the serviceability of the Airport for larger aircraft wishing to use the airport.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 19+
PRIORITY 5 - Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcels 64-A-64
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire parcel 64 -A-64 on Bufflick Road. This parcel is critical
to airport development because of the close proximity within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $275,000
Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia 15.2, the airport is required to o wn fee simple
property located within the primary surfaces. There are currently more than 120 based aircraft at the Winchester Regional Air port.
The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired
and vertical obstructions are minimized.
42
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 6 - Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcel 64-A-60
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcel 64-A-60 (Cooper, David) on Bufflick Road to
meet FAA design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. This parcel is critical to airport development because of the close proximity
within or near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $275,000
Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia 15.2e, the airport is required to own fee simple
property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currently more than 120 aircraft based at the Winchester Regional Air port.
The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired
and vertical obstructions are minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 17-18
PRIORITY 7 - Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcel 64 A 59
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority p roposes to acquire Parcel 64-A-59 (Kyle) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA
design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. This parcel is critical to airport development because of the close proximity within or
near the airport primary surfaces.
Capital Cost: $300,000
Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia 15.2e, the airport is required to own fee simple
property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currently more than 120 aircraft based at the Winchester Regional Airport.
The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increased safety on the airport once the parcels are acq uired
and vertical obstructions are minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
PRIORITY 8 - Land Acquisition – Bufflick Road – Parcel 64-A-52
Description: The Winchester Regional Airport Authority proposes to acquire Parcel 64 -A-52 (Lee) on Bufflick Road to meet FAA
design standards for Runway 14 Safety Area. This parcel is critical to airport development because of the close proximity within or
near the airport primary surfaces.
43
Capital Cost: $300,000
Justification: Under the FAA Part 77 Surface Requirements and the Code of Virginia 15.2e, the airport is required to own fee simple
property located within the Primary Surfaces. There are currently more than 120 aircraft based at the Winchester Regional Air port.
The owners and passengers of these aircraft will have the benefit of increa sed safety on the airport once the parcels are acquired
and vertical obstructions are minimized.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 18-19
44
County Administration Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1 - Clearbrook Convenience Site Relocation
Description: The current two-acre facility is situated on quarry land and is the beneficiary of a no-cost lease which ended
December 31, 2015. The owner, Carmeuse Lime & Stone, has asked that the County vacate its property by the end of 2017. The
original lease agreement was negotiated between the County and the previous quarry owner, O-N Minerals Co., which planned to
long wall mine below the surface. Due to Carmeuse’s intention to use an open pit approach during its expansion, the convenien ce
site will be forced to relocate to another parcel in the Clear Brook/Stephenson community. In order to provide uninterrupted
service to the citizens of this area, it is imperative that land acquisition, design and construction begin immediately.
Capital Cost: $540,650
Justification: Planned quarry expansion will mandate that the current facility be relocated, preferably on County-owned land in the
Clear Brook/Stephenson community. For residents in this area, the next closest convenience site is located on Indian Hollow Road in
Albin, a distance of seven miles. The Albin location is already the County’s most heavily used facility at an average of 16,270 vehicles
trips each month. Logistically, the Albin facility cannot accommodate as many as 500 additional vehicles traveling from the Clear
Brook community to deposit refuse and recycling. Although the landfill is an option and has sufficient capacity, it is locat ed 13 miles
away from the current Clear Brook facility.
Construction Schedule: Construction beginning in FY 17
PRIORITY 2 - Albin Convenience Site Relocation
Description: The relocation of the Albin citizens’ convenience site to property located within the Sunnyside/Albin community is
projected for FY 18/19. A fenced two-acre site is proposed between North Frederick Pike and Indian Hollow Road on County-owned
property in close proximity to the existing site, ideally on a portion of the former FCPS transportation facility. The projec t will require
several months to complete including fencing, earthwork, retaining walls, electric, equipment, lighting, paving and landscaping.
Capital Cost: $570,650
Justification: During August of 2016, 16,270 vehicles visited the Albin facility, making it the single most utilized solid waste facility
outside of the landfill. Usage continues to rise each year as the site serves a geographic area extending from Sunnyside to Cedar
Creek Grade westward to Gainesboro. It is easily accessible from Route 37 and North Frederick Pike.
45
The total number of vehicles using the facility, an average of 651 p er day, represents an eight percent increase over 2016. On Fridays
and weekends, this number can exceed 800 vehicles. As trash disposal and the resulting traffic continue to increase, the pres ent
infrastructure will be unable to safely serve the public. During holidays, the site requires two attendants in order to efficiently move
traffic. However, lines still back out onto Indian Hollow Road during holidays and some weekends, creating a hazard noted sev eral
times by the Sheriff’s Office.
For residents living between Cedar Creek Grade and Apple Pie Ridge Road, curbside pickup is costly, prompting heavy utilization of
the convenience site which attracts a mix of users from the suburbs and rural community. A number of users are those from the
more western end disposing of their trash when traveling into Winchester. Avid recyclers from Westminster -Canterbury,
Shenandoah University, Shenandoah’s Pharmacy School and SU students living in nearby townhomes also frequent the facility.
Construction Schedule: Construction beginning in FY 18/19
PRIORITY 3 - Gore Refuse Site Relocation/Expansion
Description: The project will expand refuse capacity in the Gore community by installing a surplus trash compactor. Installation of
a compactor at Gore will drive down collection costs at the site where trash is now collected in 10 8 -yard boxes. In order to
accomplish this, and account for improved traffic flow and the construction of compactor and recycling staging areas, the sit e will be
expanded onto an adjoining parcel owned by the County.
Capital Cost: $388,105
Justification: A total of 3,140 vehicles utilized the facility during the month of August 2016. On a typical Saturday, usage peaks at
156 vehicles. The project will pay for itself in lower refuse collection costs through compaction of solid waste before transport. Also,
with a compactor in place, refuse will be contained in an enclosed receiver can, reducing blowing litter and odor and vectors , all of
which can be a problem when using open coll ection cans. The project will also provide much-needed capacity during heavy flow
times such as weekends and holidays. All 10 containers now fill to capacity during Saturdays and Sundays. Numerous times, the site
has closed early on Sundays when capacity is reached. A 40-yard roll-off container is used during holidays to contain excess trash
and pulled multiple times, another additional expense. An upgraded site will meet the current and future solid waste needs of the
Gore community.
Construction Schedule: Construction beginning in FY 19/20
PRIORITY 4 - General Government Capital Expenditures
46
Description: This project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of General Governmental Capital
Expenditures. It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for
governmental agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities. Such expenditures may be less than th e
established $100,000 departmental threshold. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring
that this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is for the benefit of
the County Governmental Entities participating in the CIP but does not include individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing capital equipment for governm ental
agencies and to allow for improvements to general governmental facilities will enable the County to meet the requirements of the
Code of Virginia with regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the governmental entities.
Construction Schedule: N/A
PRIORITY 5 - County/School Board Administration Building
Description: This project consists of a County/School Board Administration Building, to be located generally in the County’s Urban
Development Area. The Joint Administrative Office Complex project is for a new 150,000 square foot office building shared with the
County Schools Administration. The Schools’ portion would be 50,000 square feet.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the
benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting space, and governmen t
services in an accessible location.
Construction Schedule: TBD
PRIORITY 6 - Joint Judicial Center New Facility
Description: This new project consists of a new future Joint Judicial Center Facility to be located generally in the City of Winchester
or in the County’s Urban Development Area.
Capital Cost: TBD
Justification: The inclusion of this capital facility will allow for improvements to general governmental facilities and services for the
benefit of the residents of Frederick County and will meet the increasing need for office space, meeting s pace, and government
47
services in an accessible location. The need for this project has been established through ongoing communication with the court
system and the City of Winchester.
Construction Schedule: TBD
48
Fire & Rescue Project Priority List
PRIORITY 1
Fire & Rescue Station #22 / Annex Facilities (Route 277)
Description: Construct a two bay Fire and Rescue Station with satellite Sheriff’s office and the potential for office and meeting
room space for the County and community. The station will be located in the area of Fairfax Pike, White Oak Road, and Tasker Road
to provide service for the heavy growth area east of Stephens City. An approximate three -acre site will be needed to accommodate
this facility. The fire station will be approximately a 10,000 sq ft facility to house an engine and ambulance. Those who would occupy
the facility will determine the size of the satellite office and meeting room space. This facility is specifically identified in the Route
277 Triangle and Urban Center Land Use Plan approved in 2008.
Capital Cost: $3,400,000
Justification: This development is scheduled to be an active adult resort gated community with age restrictions on 80% of the
homes above 55 and the other 20% above 45. The developer‘s master plan will allow for 2,130 individual dwelling units using a mix
of housing types.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 2
Fire & Rescue Station #22 / Apparatus (Route 277)
Description: Purchase one (1) custom pumper equipped and one (1) custom Type I Advanced Life Support (A.L.S.) capable
ambulance equipped to be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22.
Capital Cost: $905,000
Justification: This fire and rescue apparatus will be assigned to Fire and Rescue Station 22 located on Fairfax Pike East in the
Stephens City area of Frederick County. The pumper will be built to N.F.P.A. 1901 specifications and equipped with all of th e
required and necessary equipment to function as a Class A Pumper. The ambulance will be built to the Federal KKK -A-1822E
specifications and equipped with all of the required and necessary equipment to function as an Advanced Life Support ambulance.
49
This fire and rescue apparatus is needed due to the fact that the Fire and Rescue Department currently owns one (1) pumper an d
one (1) ladder truck that are twenty (20) plus years of age and already assigned to other functions. The currently owned fire and
rescue apparatus would not endure the demands placed on it while being assigned to a high call volume.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 16-17
PRIORITY 3
Fire & Rescue Station #23 / New Facility (Crosspointe)
Description: This project consists of a 10,000 square foot fire station to accommodate 4 pieces of emergency equipment, and to
house living and sleeping areas for staff. This project also has the potential for office and meeting room space for the County and
community with an additional 2,000 square feet of building area. A two and ½ acre parcel should be sufficient for building, p arking
and amenities for approximately 20 to 30 persons. The project is located at Crosspointe Center at the end of current R oute 37 South,
an area of proposed high density residential development, and commercial development.
Capital Cost: $3,700,000
Justification: The proposed location at the South end of Route 37 provides for quick and easy access to Interstate 81 North and
South at the 310 Exit. Access and response on Route 37 will be greatly enhanced from Interstate 81 to Route 50 West in the
Northbound Lane. Currently Stephens City and Round Hill Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies serve the area. This location also
provides easy access to Route 11 and the Kernstown area along with access to Middle Road and Subdivisions of Brookneil,
Stonebrook, and Jacksons Woods. These subdivisions have large single family homes in an area of Frederick County outside of the
UDA. Water supplies are scarce in these areas and a rapid response from this proposed facility will likely reduce property da mage
from fire and response times for Medical Emergencies. Major collector roads such as Tasker Road and Warrior Drive along with the
proposed extension of Route 37 and new roadways in the development will provide quick access to additional homes and businesses
in areas including Front Royal Pike, Papermill Road. These roadway construction efforts will provide for an increased level of quality
emergency service to the citizens in this entire area.
Construction Schedule: To be determined.
50
PRIORITY 4
Fire & Rescue Regional Training Center
Description: Construct a Regional Public Safety Training Center potentially consisting of an administrative building, multi-story
burn building, multi-story training tower, vehicle driving range, shooting range, and numerous other training props. This project will
incorporate emergency medical services, fire, hazardous materials, rescue, law enforcement, industrial, and educational institutions
located in Clarke County, Frederick County, Shenandoah County, Warren County, Winchester City, State Agencies, Federal Agenci es,
and potentially jurisdictions within the State of West Virginia.
Capital Cost: $31,175,000
Justification: This project will facilitate realistic training in today’s modern environment for emergency services and industrial
personnel located throughout the Northern Shenandoah Valley and expanding into the State of West Virginia. This project will
reinforce existing training programs in those respective agencies and jurisdictions as well as facilitate training that is cu rrently not
available within the Northern Shenandoah Valley which causes students and instructors to travel into the Washington Metropolitan
region. The number of potential personnel being trained at this Training Center is potentially in the thousands based upon t raining
statistics provided in July 2007 by the participating agencies.
Construction Schedule: Completion in FY 20-21
Fire & Rescue Company Capital Project Requests
Capital Equipment Fire & Rescue – Vehicles & Equipment
Description: This new project consists of a revolving fund in the amount of $1,000,000 for the benefit of Fire and Rescue Services.
It is the intention of this capital expenditure fund to be for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital e quipment
fire and rescue vehicles and equipment. It was determined that the inclusion of such a project would be beneficial in ensuring that
this significant capital expense is identified in the County’s capital planning and budget process. This project is primarily for the
benefit of the individual Volunteer Fire and Rescue Companies.
Capital Cost: $1,000,000
51
Justification: The inclusion of this capital expenditure fund for the purpose of purchasing additional and replacement capital
equipment fire and rescue vehicles and equipment will enable the County to meet the r equirements of the Code of Virginia with
regards to the collection and disbursement of cash proffers accepted on behalf of the fire and rescue companies.
Construction Schedule: N/A
Individual Fire & Rescue Company Capital and Capital Equipment Requests.
The individual Fire and Rescue Companies requests have been added to the CIP. The individual Fire and Rescue Companies have
identified their own capital requests which have been recognized in the CIP by way of a total project category. The projects are in no
particular order.
(This information may be found on the County’s website www.fcva.us/planning)
F
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN #05-17
Abrams Chase
Staff Report for the Planning Commission
Prepared: October 13, 2017
Staff Contact: M. Tyler Klein, AICP, Planner
This report is prepared by the Frederick County Planning Staff to provide information to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to assist in the review of this application. It may
also be useful to others interested in this zoning matter.
Reviewed Action
Planning Commission: 11/01/17 Pending
Board of Supervisors: 12/13/17 Pending
PROPOSAL: The Applicant seeks to develop 3.25 acres of land zoned RP (Residential Performance)
District with 13 single-family detached (SFD) age-restricted unit. This Master Development Plan (MDP)
also includes 0.64 acres dedicated to public right-of-way for improvements along Senseny Road.
The Applicant also is seeking a waiver for the community center requirement specified in Section 165-
204.08(A) in single-family small lot subdivision that contain less than 25 lots.
MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT: Shawnee
PROPERTY ID NUMBERS: 65-A-27A and 65-A-28A
LOCATION: The properties are located west approximately 400 feet west of Channing Drive,
immediately west of Parkwood Circle, and north of Senseny Road (Route 657).
PROPERTY ZONING & PRESENT USE:
Zoned: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential/Vacant
ZONING & PRESENT USE OF ADJOINING PROPERTIES:
North: RP (Residential Performance) Use: Residential/Open Space
South: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Agricultural/Vacant
East: RP (Rural Performance) Use: Residential
West: RA (Rural Areas) Use: Residential
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 11/01/17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
The Master Development Plan for Abrams Chase appears to be consistent with the requirements of
Article VIII, Master Development Plan, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and this MDP is in
a form that is administratively approvable. The MDP is also in conformance with the proffers for the
approved Rezoning #04-15. Also, Staff finds the request for a waiver of the community center
requirement as appropriate, as the proposed subdivisions contains less than 25 lots and the Applicant
will provide equivalent recreational value within the development. All of the issues brought forth by the
Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed by the Applicant.
MDP #05-17 Abrams Chase
October 20, 2017
Page 2
It appears that the application meets all requirements. Following presentation of the application to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, and the incorporation of your comments, staff is
prepared to proceed to approval of the application.
REVIEW EVALUATIONS:
Virginia Department of Transportation: A VDOT review has been conducted for the Abram’s Chase
Master Development Plan Revision signature dated 8/23/2017. We have no objection to the plan. Please
send one electronic set of the plans to this office for file.
Frederick County Fire Marshal: MDP approved provided that the turnaround be changed to meet
Frederick County Fire Prevention Code.
Frederick County Public Works: We offer no additional comments at this time. A comprehensive
review should occur at subdivision plan submission.
Frederick County Inspections: No comments required at this time. Comments shall be provided at the
time of subdivision lot review.
Frederick County Parks and Recreation: Plan appears to meet or exceed Parks and Recreation
requirements.
Virginia Department of Health: Please see attached letter dated August 31, 2017 from Herbert
Cormier, Environmental Health Supervisor.
Frederick Water: Approved as noted.
Planning & Zoning:
A) Master Development Plan Requirement
A Master Development Plan is required prior to development of this property. Before a MDP
can be approved, it must be reviewed by the Planning Commission, Board of Supervisors and all
relevant review agencies. Approval may only be granted if the MDP conforms to all
requirements of the Frederick County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances. The purpose of the
MDP is to promote orderly and planned development of the property within Frederick County
that suits the characteristics of the land, is harmonious with adjoining property and is in the best
interest of the general public.
The Applicant also is seeking a waiver for the community center requirement specified in
Section 165-204.08(A) in single-family small lot subdivision that contain less than 25 lots. In
lieu of a community center, the Applicant intends to fulfill the required recreation uni ts for the
development with an outdoor pavilion for the public with other amenities to-be-determined at
time of the subdivision design plan.
B) Site History
On January 10, 2007, the Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning #11-06 to rezone 3.25 acres
from RA (Rural Areas) District to RP (Residential Performance) District to enable the
construction of single-family residential lots with proffered improvements. On July 8, 2015, the
MDP #05-17 Abrams Chase
October 20, 2017
Page 3
Board of Supervisors approved Rezoning #04-15 modify the proffers approved with Rezoning
#11-06 to restrict the residential uses to age-restricted residential uses and to reduce the monetary
contributions for proffered improvements given the change to age-restricted units.
C) Site Suitability & Project Scope
Comprehensive Plan:
The 2035 Comprehensive Policy Plan is an official public document that serves as the
Community's guide for making decisions regarding development, preservation, public facilities
and other key components of community life. The primary goal of this Plan is to protect and
improve the living environment within Frederick County. It is in essence a composition of
policies used to plan for the future physical development of Frederick County.
Land Use Compatibility:
The Senseny/Eastern Frederick Urban Area Plan (SEFUAP) of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan
identifies this property with residential and commercial land use designations. The current RP
(Residential Performance) District designation is supported by the Comprehensive Plan for this
area of the County.
The Master Development Plan for Abrams Chase is also generally consistent with the approved
proffers with the most recent Rezoning #04-15, providing the required open space, access,
sidewalks/trail section and future inter-parcel connection.
Site Access and Transportation:
Access, as shown on the MDP, will be provided to the site via Senseny Road. Future inter-parcel
access (to Tax Map Parcel 65-A-25B) is provided to the west, should those properties develop
into residential subdivisions; and a turnaround is provided for residents. Sidewalks will be
included on either side of the internal street for pedestrian connectivity within the development,
and a 10’ trail will be provided along the property frontage on Senseny Road.
The right-of-way for the future condition of Senseny Road as a four-lane roadway is also
reserved along the properties frontage as shown on the MDP.
STAFF CONCLUSIONS FOR THE 11/01/17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING:
The Master Development Plan for Abrams Chase appears to be consistent with the requirements of
Article VIII, Master Development Plan, of the Frederick County Zoning Ordinance, and this MDP is in
a form that is administratively approvable. The MDP is also in conformance with the proffers for the
approved Rezoning #11-06. Also, Staff finds the request for a waiver of the community center
requirement as appropriate, as the proposed subdivisions contains less than 25 lots and the Applicant
will provide equivalent recreational value within the development. All of the issues brought forth by the
Planning Commission should be appropriately addressed by the Applicant.
It appears that the application meets all requirements. Following presentation of the application to the
Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors, and the incorporation of your comments, staff is
prepared to proceed to approval of the application.
ST657
65 A 15
65 A 15A
65 A 16
65 A 35C
65 A 34
55K 11 24A
55K 11 24A
55K 11 24A
65B 9 1
65B 9 10
65 A 28A
65B 9 2
65 A 25B
65 A 26A
65B 9 9
65 A 25A 65 A 27A
65B 9 3
65 A 25
65B 9 8 65B 9 4
65 A 24
65B 9 7A 65B 9 5
65B 9 7
65B 9 6
55K 11 7 55K 11 6
55K 11 5
55K 11 9 55K 1 1 8 55K 11 4
CHA
N
N
I
N
G
D
R
SENSENY R
D
PARK
W
O
O
D
C
I
R
Applications
Parcels
Building Footprints
B1 (Neighborhood Business District)
B2 (General Business District)
B3 (Industrial Transition District)
EM (Extractive Manufacturing District)
HE (Higher Education District)
M1 (Light Industrial District)
M2 (Industrial General District)
MH1 (Mobile Home Community District)
MS (Medical Support District)
OM (Office - Manufacturing Park)
R4 (Residential Planned Community District)
R5 (Residential Recreational Community District)
RA (Rural Areas District)
RP (Residential Performance District)
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: September 15, 2017Staff: tklein
SENSENY RD
CHAN
N
I
N
G
D
R
MALO
Y
D
R
G
R
E
E
N
W
O
O
D
R
D
ROSS
M
A
N
N
B
L
V
D
WOODROW RD
SUN
S
E
T
D
R
LYNN
E
H
A
V
E
N
D
R
BR
O
A
D
A
V
E
MADIG
A
N
L
N
TEA
B
E
R
R
Y
D
R
WAYFARIN
G
D
R
ARD
E
Y
T
H
L
N
ROS
S
U
M
L
N
DIX
I
E
B
E
L
L
E
D
R
VAN GOGH
T
E
R
WAL
E
S
C
T
MDP # 05 - 17Abrams ChasePINs:65 - A - 27A, 65 - A - 28A
0 130 26065 Feet
MDP # 05 - 17Abrams ChasePINs:65 - A - 27A, 65 - A - 28A
MDP #05-17
MDP #05-17
ST657
65 A 15
65 A 15A
65 A 16
65 A 35C
65 A 34
55K 11 24A
55K 11 24A
55K 11 24A
65B 9 1
65B 9 10
65 A 28A
65B 9 2
65 A 25B
65 A 26A
65B 9 9
65 A 25A 65 A 27A
65B 9 3
65 A 25
65B 9 8 65B 9 4
65 A 24
65B 9 7A 65B 9 5
65B 9 7
65B 9 6
55K 11 7 55K 11 6
55K 11 5
55K 11 9 55K 1 1 8 55K 11 4
CHA
N
N
I
N
G
D
R
SENSENY R
D
PARK
W
O
O
D
C
I
R
Applications
Parcels
Building Footprints
I
Note:Frederick County Dept ofPlanning & Development107 N Kent StSuite 202Winchester, VA 22601540 - 665 - 5651Map Created: September 15, 2017Staff: tklein
SENSENY RD
CHAN
N
I
N
G
D
R
MALO
Y
D
R
G
R
E
E
N
W
O
O
D
R
D
ROSS
M
A
N
N
B
L
V
D
WOODROW RD
SUN
S
E
T
D
R
LYNN
E
H
A
V
E
N
D
R
BR
O
A
D
A
V
E
MADIG
A
N
L
N
TEA
B
E
R
R
Y
D
R
WAYFARIN
G
D
R
ARD
E
Y
T
H
L
N
ROS
S
U
M
L
N
DIX
I
E
B
E
L
L
E
D
R
VAN GOGH
T
E
R
WAL
E
S
C
T
MDP # 05 - 17Abrams ChasePINs:65 - A - 27A, 65 - A - 28A
0 130 26065 Feet
MDP # 05 - 17Abrams ChasePINs:65 - A - 27A, 65 - A - 28A
MDP #05-17
MDP #05-17
G
PLANNING COMMISSION BYLAWS
County of Frederick, Virginia
Proposed for Consideration
At the November 1, 2017 Planning Commission
ARTICLE I - AUTHORIZATION
1-1 The Frederick County Planning Commission is established by and in conformance with
Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County, and in accord with the provisions of Section
15.2-2210 of the Code of Virginia (1950), as amended.
1-2 The official title of this body shall be the Frederick County Planning Commission,
hereinafter referred to as the "Commission".
ARTICLE II - PURPOSE
2-1 The primary purpose of the Commission is to advise the Frederick County Board of
Supervisors and to carry out all duties and functions described by the Code of Virginia, as
amended.
ARTICLE III - MEMBERSHIP
3-1 The membership of the Commission shall be determined by the Frederick County Board
of Supervisors as specified in Chapter 21 of the Code of Frederick County. Methods of
appointment and terms of office shall be determined by Chapter 21 of the Code of
Frederick County.
3-2 Within the first month of initial appointment, new Commissioner appointees shall: 1)
participate in an orientation to familiarize themselves with the operations of the
Department and the Commission, and 2) meet with planning staff representatives in an
effort to review and better understand specific agenda items by no later than their second
Planning Commission meeting.
Page 2
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
ARTICLE IV - OFFICERS
4-1 Officers of the Commission shall consist of a chairman, vice-chairman and secretary.
The chairman and vice-chairman must be voting members of the Commission. The
secretary shall be a member of the Commission or a county employee.
4-2 Selection
4-2-1 The officers shall be elected by the voting members of the Commission at
the first meeting of the calendar year.
4-2-2 Nomination of officers shall be made from the floor. Elections of officers
shall follow immediately. A candidate receiving a majority vote of the
entire voting membership shall be declared elected.
4-3 Duties
4-3-1 The Chairman shall:
4-3-1-1 Preside at meetings.
4-3-1-2 Appoint committees.
4-3-1-3 Rule on procedural questions. A ruling on a procedural question by the
chairman shall be subject to reversal by a two-thirds majority vote of the
members present.
4-3-1-4 Report official communications.
4-3-1-5 Certify official documents involving the authority of the Commission.
4-3-1-6 Certify minutes as true and correct copies.
4-3-1-7 Carry out other duties as assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the
Commission.
4-3-2 The Vice-Chairman shall:
4-3-2-1 Assume the full powers of the chairman in the absence or inability of the
chairman to act.
4-3-2-2 When acting as chair, the vice-chairman shall carry out other duties as
Page 3
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
assigned by the Board of Supervisors and the Commission Chairman.
4-3-3 The Secretary shall:
4-3-3-1 Ensure that attendance is recorded at all meetings.
4-3-3-2 Ensure that the minutes of all Commission meetings are recorded.
4-3-3-3 Notify members of all meetings.
4-3-3-4 Prepare agendas for all meetings.
4-3-3-5 Maintain files of all official Commission records and reports. Official
records and reports may be purged in accordance with applicable state
codes.
4-3-3-6 Give notice of all Commission meetings, public hearings and public
meetings.
4-3-3-7 Provide to the Board of Supervisors reports and recommendations of the
Commission.
4-3-3-8 Attend to the correspondence necessary for the execution of the duties and
functions of the Commission.
4-4 Term of Office
4-4-1 Officers shall be elected for a one-year term or until a successor takes office.
Vacancies shall be filled for an unexpired term by a majority vote of the
Commission. In such cases, the newly elected officer shall serve only until the
end of the calendar year or until a successor takes office.
4-5 Temporary Chairman
4-5-1 In the event of the absence of both the chairman and the vice-chairman from any
meeting, the Commission shall designate from among its members a temporary
chairman who shall act for that meeting in the absence of the chairman or vice-
chairman.
Page 4
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
ARTICLE V - COMMITTEES
5-1 The Commission shall establish committees necessary to accomplish its purpose.
5-2 In establishing committees, the Commission shall describe the purpose for each
committee.
5-3 Members of the committees shall be appointed by the chairman and will serve for a term
of one year. The chairman may request recommendations from the Commission or
committee members on committee appointments.
5-4 Commission members, employees of the County, and citizen volunteers may be members
of the committee.
5-5 The chairman and vice-chairman of the Planning Commission shall be ex-officio
members of every committee.
5-6 The committees will elect a chairman and vice-chairman annually. These officers shall
be current Commission members and should represent different Magisterial Districts, if
possible.
5-7 The committees may operate as a committee of the whole or by executive committee,
with current and past Commission members serving as members of the executive
committee.
5-8 The committees may establish standing subcommittees whose activities will be a specific
responsibility of the parent committee. One executive committee member will serve as
liaison to the standing subcommittee and will assist staff in managing its activities.
Membership will be comprised of past Commission members and citizens. Membership
will be appointed by the chairman of the Committee with concurrence by the
Commission Chairman.
5-9 The committees may establish working groups to assist in specific, carefully-defined tasks
for a limited period of time. Important considerations for membership on the working
group are skills and experience necessary to assist in providing acceptable solutions.
Membership will be appointed by the Chairman of the Committee with concurrence by
the Commission Chairman.
Page 5
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
ARTICLE VI – COMMISSION MEETINGS
6-1 At the first meeting of each calendar year, the Commission shall fix the date, time, and
place of all its regular meetings for the ensuing calendar year, and shall fix the day on
which a regular meeting shall be continued should the Chairman declare that weather or
other conditions make it hazardous for members to attend.
6-2 Special meetings may be called by the chairman or by the secretary after due notice and
publication by the secretary.
6-3 Notice of all meetings shall be sent by the secretary with an agenda at least five calendar
days before the meeting.
6-4 All meetings of the Commission shall be open to the public except for Closed Sessions
held in accordance with the provision specified under Section 2.2-3711(A) of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
ARTICLE VII - VOTING
7-1 A majority of voting members shall constitute a quorum. No action shall be taken or
motion made unless a quorum is present.
7-2 No action of the Commission shall be valid unless authorized by a majority vote of those
present and voting.
ARTICLE VIII - OPERATING RULES
8-1 Order of Business for a regular meeting
8-1-1 Call to Order.
8-1-2 Adoption of the Agenda.
8-1-3 Consideration of Minutes.
8-1-4 Committee Reports.
8-1-5 Citizen Comments on Items not on the Agenda.
Page 6
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
8-1-6 Public Hearings.
8-1-7 Action Items.
8-1-8 Information/Discussion Items
8-1-9 Other.
8-1-10 Adjournment.
8-2 Minutes
8-2-1 The Commission shall keep minutes of each meeting. The chairman and
secretary shall sign all minutes following approval by the Commission certifying
that the minutes are true and correct. Minutes made available to the public prior
to formal approval by the Commission shall be clearly identified as a draft version
of the meeting.
8-3 Procedures
8-3-1 Parliamentary procedure in the Commission meetings shall be governed by
Robert's Rules of Order, except where otherwise specified in these procedures.
8-3-2 Whenever an agenda item involves a recommendation to the Board of
Supervisors, the Commission shall continue to consider the item until a definite
recommendation is made. If a motion has been made and defeated, additional,
different motions may be made concerning the item under consideration.
8-3-3 The initial motion on an agenda item shall be made by a member representing the
application’s Magisterial District. If both District representatives are absent or
decline to make the initial motion, then any other Commissioner may act.
8-3-4 Business items on the agenda shall be considered using the following procedures:
8-3-4-1 Report by County Staff.
8-3-4-2 Presentation by Applicant.
8-3-4-3 Citizen Comment.
8-3-4-4 Applicant Response.
Page 7
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
8-3-4-5 Staff Summary.
8-3-4-6 Discussion by Commission.
8-3-4-7 Motion and Action by Commission.
8-3-5 Public comment shall be allowed in all cases required by the Code of Virginia,
1950, as amended, or the Code of Frederick County. In other cases, the chairman
may allow public comment.
8-3-6 The Commission members may ask questions of clarification and information
after the staff report, applicant presentation, and/or citizen comment.
8-3-7 Petitions, displays, documents or correspondence presented at a meeting may be
made part of the official record of the meeting by motion of the Commission and
are to be kept on file by the secretary. Such items need not be made part of the
published minutes.
8-3-8 Public Hearings
8-3-8-1 The Commission shall hold public hearings on all items for which
hearings are required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended, or by the
Code of Frederick County. Such public hearing shall be advertised and
notifications provided as required by the Code of Virginia, 1950, as
amended.
8-3-8-2 The Chairman may establish special rules for any public hearing at t he
beginning of said hearing. These rules may include limitations on the time
of staff report, applicant presentation and citizen comment.
8-3-8-3 In addition to those required by law, the Commission may hold public
hearings on any matter, under the purview of the Commission, which it
deems to be in the public interest. In such cases, the public hearings shall
follow all procedures described for public hearing in these bylaws.
8-3-8-4 The 90-day period (Section 165-102.03 of the Frederick County Zoning
Ordinance) for the Planning Commission to make a rezoning
recommendation to the Board will start after the first Commission meeting
following the referral of the amendment to the Commission.
8-3-9 Tabling
Page 8
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
8-3-9-1 The Planning Commission shall have the authority to postpone agenda
items 45- calendar days (less if reaching the limits of Section 165-102.03)
for any one of the following:
A) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of
Virginia, 1950, as amended.
B) The agenda item does not meet the requirements of the Code of
Frederick County.
C) Insufficient information has been provided for the agenda item.
D) Revised proffers have been received from the applicant less than
eight (8) calendar days of the advertised Planning Commission
meeting.
E) Issues or concerns that arise during formal discussion of the
agenda item warrant additional information or study.
F) The applicant provides the Frederick County Planning Department
with a written request to postpone the agenda item.
G) The Frederick County Planning Department is advised of an
emergency situation that prevents attendance by the applicant.
H) The applicant fails to appear at the meeting in which the
application has been advertised to appear.
8-3-9-2 The applicant shall be permitted to request that an agenda item be
postponed from a scheduled Planning Commission meeting one time. The
Planning Commission shall table the application for a specific period of
time to ensure that the requirements of Section 165-102.03 of the
Frederick County Zoning Ordinance are not exceeded unless the applicant
requests a waiver from this requirement. In no case shall an application be
postponed for more than 12 months from the time the complete
application was received by the Zoning Administrator or applicable staff.
8-3-9-3 An application that has been postponed for an unspecified period of time
shall be re-advertised for consideration by the Planning Commission once
the following steps have been completed:
Page 9
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
A) The applicant has requested in writing that the agenda item be
considered by the Planning Commission.
B) The applicant has provided all required information to the
Frederick County Planning Department which addresses all
concerns of the Planning Commission.
8-3-10 Work sessions
8-3-10-1 The Commission may hold work sessions at which the procedural rules of
these bylaws shall not apply.
8-3-10-2 Work sessions shall be held after the adjournment of regular meetings or
at the time and place set by the Commission and/or the Board of
Supervisors.
8-3-10-3 Notice of work sessions shall be sent to the Planning Commissioners at
least five days before the session.
8-3-10-4 The chairman shall lead the session and require orderly behavior and
discussion.
8-3-10-5 No actions shall be taken or motions made at a work session.
8-3-10-6 Work sessions shall be open to the public. Public comment is not required
at a work session.
8-3-10-7 The secretary shall keep a general record of all work sessions and the
items discussed.
8-3-11 Adjournment
8-3-11-1 In no case shall the Commission consider any new items
after 10:30 P.M. and the meeting shall be adjourned by
11:00 P.M. In the instance that an item begun before
10:30P.M. has not been acted on by the 11:00 P.M. hour,
the Commission may, by majority vote, lift the
adjournment time until a recommendation has been made,
or such time, after 11:00 P.M., as the Commission may fix.
ARTICLE IX - AMENDMENTS
Page 10
Planning Commission Bylaws
Proposed for consideration at the November 1, 2017
9-1 These bylaws may be amended by a majority vote of the entire voting
membership after thirty days prior notice at any time during the calendar year.
9-2 The Planning Commission shall conduct an annual review of these bylaws each
calendar year to ensure their accuracy.
9-3 At the first meeting of the calendar year, the By-Laws will be adopted.
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Proposed for Consideration
At the November 1, 2017 Planning Commission
This document has been prepared to assist Frederick County Planning Commissioners in
understanding what their role and responsibilities are in the myriad of activities that they
accept as a member of the Planning Commission. This compilation is a companion
document to the Commission’s By-Laws.
APPLICATION COMMUNICATIONS
There are three primary sources of information gathered by and weighed by the Planning
Commission in order to make quality planning recommendations to the Board of
Supervisors. They are ex-parte communications, staff reports and public input.
Ex-Parte Communications:
Individual meetings between Commissioners and an applicant/developer regarding a
specific application shall follow the Virginia Freedom of Information Act. During this
discussion or at any other time prior to action taken by the Commission on the
application, a Planning Commissioner should make no commitments or endorsements.
Any new written materials provided by the applicant to any one Commissioner shall be
made available to all commissioners and staff by the applicant prior to the application
appearing on the agenda. To not do so may result in the application being tabled at the
Planning Commission public hearing.
Staff Application Briefings/Work Sessions:
Prior to the first public hearing being held, staff will hold a briefing for the Planning
Commissioners, with an invitation extended to the Board of Supervisors to participate,
regarding any application deemed sufficiently complicated / controversial to warrant
detailed explanation. The purpose is to apprise the Commissioners regarding the details
of the application, both those items that meet the ordinance and those that do not. This
provides the opportunity for the Commissioners to have a common understanding of the
application prior to the public hearing. The decision to hold a briefing on a specific
application will be made jointly by the Director of Planning and the Chairman of the
Planning Commission. In addition to complexity, the application shall be basically
complete prior to scheduling the briefing.
The Planning Commission may request a work session for an application which, after the
first public hearing is concluded, is subsequently postponed. The purpose of the work
Page 2
Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities
Proposed November 1, 2017
session is to discuss amongst each other and with staff details of the application, any
revised proffers provided or anticipated by the applicant, and other improvements which
could be made to the application.
For either a briefing or a work session:
-The applicant should attend, but will not have an active role.
-The format of a Planning Commission work session as identified in paragraph 8-
3-10 of the Commission’s By-Laws will be used.
-In no case will the legal timeline for consideration before the Planning
Commission be changed.
Public Hearing/Meeting:
Efficient and effective public hearings are an essential part of enabling the Commission
to make reasoned recommendations to the Board of Supervisors.
Every attempt will be made to obtain focused and broad representation of opinion or
information from the public. When possible, specific time limitations will not be used.
However, both rules of order as well as time constraints most appropriate for the specific
application will be implemented when there is either large interest in or controversy
regarding an application.
One constant during this process on both the part of the public, the applicant and the
Commission itself is civility and respect for information offered or a differing opinion.
Deviation from this behavior is unacceptable.
COMMISSIONER DEVELOPMENT:
Each Commissioner shall be committed to preparing for and keeping knowledge current
in order to do the most effective job for the community.
New initial appointees should strive to obtain Planning Commissioner certification from
an acceptable training program within the first year of appointment. This training is
supported by the Planning Department budget.
Further continuing education through many offerings should be pursued and will be
supported by the Planning budget as possible. These opportunities should be shared
amongst the number of Commissioners who are serving. Examples include PlanVirginia
Page 3
Planning Commission Roles and Responsibilities
Proposed November 1, 2017
annual meeting, other special offerings as well as the American Planning Association’s
readings and meetings. A library is maintained by the Planning office.
COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE
Commissioners are expected to participate in 80% of the regularly scheduled meetings
per year. Members who cannot attend a meeting due to illness, business, and other
governmental or family reasons should notify the Commission Chairman and/or staff
Administrative Assistant prior to the scheduled meeting in order for the absence to be
noted. It may affect quorum considerations.
Especially essential is preparation and readiness for each of the Commission’s meetings
in order to use not only the Commission’s but the staff’s and public’s time wisely.
COMMISSION COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS:
Appointments to a Commission committee or liaison assignments are made by the
chairman and shared by the membership. Generally, they involve a once per month
meeting.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
Each Commissioner needs to be familiar with Commonwealth of Virginia information on
conflict of interest. If a Commissioner is unsure if there is conflict, the County Attorney
is the correct resource.
Upon determination that there is or might be perceived to be a conflict, the Commissioner
should state immediately after the agenda item is read that recusal action is necessary
(with, preferably, stating the reason) then step down from the dais until the item is
concluded.
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION:
Commissioners are citizens, too. If there is a public item that is of interest, the
Commissioner should participate, but not identify themselves as members of the
Frederick County Planning Commission unless acting in an official capacity and directed
to do so. Implied endorsements by the Commission should be avoided.