Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout03-16 FCC NEPA Review0 0 T4 / TRILEAF ENVIRONMENTAL • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING 8600 LaSalle Road, Suite 301, Towson, Maryland 21286 -410.853.7128 - www.trileafcom December 17, 2015 Virginia Department of Historic Resources Attn: Chris Novelli DHR Administration Office 10 Courthouse Avenue Petersburg, VA 23803 Phone: 804 -482 -6097 RE: Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless ( Verizon Wireless) — Shenandoah Hills / EnSite #27390 — Trileaf Project #619112 143 Greenwood Road, Winchester, Frederick County, VA 22602 Stephenson, VA -WV Quadrangle (DeLorme) Latitude: 39° 11' 12.58" N, Longitude: 78° 06' 39.644" W Dear Mr. Novelli: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 155 -foot tall monopole communications tower and associated equipment within a 50- foot by 50 -foot (2,500 square feet) lease area The project includes an approximately 12 -foot wide proposed access /utility easement that extends south, and then west connecting with Greenwood Road. Currently the site consists of an undeveloped grass - covered field east of a church building. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). In accordance with the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission, dated September 2004, a cultural resource investigation has been conducted. Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on, or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Summary reports of this investigation, maps, photographs and other information are provided in the attached Form 620. As noted in Attachment 5, there is a finding of No Adverse Adverse Effects to Historic Properties within the APE for Direct Effects and Visual Effects. We appreciate your cooperation in this regard and anticipate your concurrence with these findings. Please call me at (410) 853 -7128 or email s.levy@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, a0&qzq Sara H. Levy Project Scientist II 0 FCC Form 620 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approved by OMB 3060 - 1039 Notification Date New Tower ( "NT ") Submission Packet See instructions for File Number public burden estimates General Information 1) (Select only one) ( NE ) NE - New UA - Update of Application WD - Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application File Number: currently on file. Ilcant InTormation 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0012845343 4) Name: Verizon Wireless Contact Name 5) First Name: Robin 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Haeffner 8) Suffix: 9) Title: VZW -HQ - NEPA Regulatory Compliance r..nr r4 Infnrm tinn 10) P O. Box: 0d 11) Street Address 6 Campus Circle Suite 500 12) City: Westlake 13) State: TX 14) Zip Code: 76272 15) Telephone Number: (501)529 -5377 16) Fax Number. 17) E -mail Address: npa @verizonwireless.com Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0011724176 19) Name: CHRS, Inc., on behalf of Trileaf Corporation Principal Investigator 20) First Name: Kenneth 21) MI: 22) Last Name: Basalik 23) Suffix: 24) Title: Principal Investigator 25) P.O. Box: 19946 I of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 FnrdT26) Street Address: 451 North Cannon Avenue 27) City: Lansdale 28) State: PA 29) Zip Code: 19946 30) Telephone Number: (267)653 -7115 31) Fax Number: 32) E -mail Address: s.levy @trileaf.com I of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Professional Qualification 33) Does the Principal Investigator satisfy the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards? I (X ) Yes ( ) No 34) Areas of Professional Qualification: X ) Archaeologist Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) Additional Staff 35) Are there other staff involved who meet the Professional Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( X )yes ( ) No If "YES " comnlete the followina: 36) First Name: Maureen 37) MI: 38) Last Name: McDougall 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: Archaeologist X ) Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) 36) First Name: Rachael 37) MI: E 38) Last Name: Fowler 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: X ) Archaeologist Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) 2 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 36) First Name: Tod 37) MI: 38) Last Name: Bedingfield 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional Qualification: X ) Archaeologist Architectural Historian Historian Architect Other (Specify) 3 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Site Information ewer Construction Notification System 1) TCNS Notification Number: 134208 Sitp Infnrmntinn Ll 2) Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: ( ) Yes ( X No 3) Site Name: Shenandoah Hills 4) Site Address: 143 Greenwood Road 5) Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: No Township Found. 6) City: Winchester 7) State: VA 8) Zip Code: 22603 9) County /Borough /Parish: FREDERICK 10) Nearest Crossroads: Greenwood Road / Berryville Pike 11) NAD 83 Latitude (DD- MM- SS.S): 39 -11 -12.6 X )Nor ( ) S 12) NAD 83 Longitude (DD- MM- SS.S): 078 -06 -39.6 E or ( X )A Tower Information 13) Tower height above ground level (include top- mounted attachments such as lightning rods): 47.2 ( ) Feet ( X ) Meters 14) Tower Type (Select One): Guyed lattice tower Self- supporting lattice X ) Monopole Other (Describe): rojeci status 15) Current Project Status (Select One): X ) Construction has not yet commenced Construction has commenced, but is not completed Construction commenced on: Construction has been completed Construction commenced on: Construction completed on: 4 of 15 FCC Forth 620 May 2014 0 Determination of Effect 14) Direct Effects (Select One): No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) No Effect on Historic Properties in APE X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APE 5 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal /NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes /NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 134208 Number of Tribes /NHOs: 6 2b) Tribes /NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes /NHOs: 0 1 ride /NHU Gontacteo I nroU n I GNJ 3) Tribe /NHO FRN: 4) Tribe /NHO Name: Catawba Indian Nation itact Name 5) First Name: Dr. Wenonah 6) MI G 7) Last Name: Haire 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO and Executive Director VAICJ at RCJ VIIJC 10) Date Contacted 12/10/2015 11) Date Replied X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other I rlbe /NHU Uontactea 1 nroU n I L N5 3) Tribe /NHO FRN: 4) Tribe /NHO Name: Cherokee Nation itact Name 5) First Name: Sheila 6) MI: M 7) Last Name: Bird 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO uates at rtes onse 10) Date Contacted 12/09/2015 11) Date Replied X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other 6 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal /NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APES for direct and visual ( X ) yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes /NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 134208 Number of Tribes /NHOs: 6 2b) Tribes /NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes /NHOs: 0 I IILiu/ IN" WVVI I ICII.ICu IIIIVV 11 IVI \J 3) Tribe /NHO FRN: 4) TribelNHO Name: Delaware Nation act Name 5) First Name: Nekole 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Alligood 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Cultural Preservation Director uates is rtes onse 10) Date Contacted 12/10/2015 11) Date Replied X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other I ripe /NHV Gontactecl 1 nroU n I L NJ 3) Tribe /NHO FRN: 4) Tribe /NHO Name: Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma act Name 5) First Name: Travis 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Patton 8) Suffix: 9) Title: TCNS Coordinator uates & Kesponse 10) Date Contacted 12/10/2015 11) Date Replied 12/10/2015 No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest X ) Replied /Other 7 of I5 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Tribal /NHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APEs for direct and visual ( X ) Yes ( ) No effects? 2a) Tribes /NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: 134208 Number of Tribes /NHOs: 6 2b) Tribes /NHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Tribes /NHOs: 0 I ribe /NHV Gontacteo I nrou n I GN5 3) Tribe /NHO FRN: 4) Tribe /NHO Name: Shawnee Tribe act Name 5) First Name: Kim 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Jumper 8) Suffix: 9) Title: THPO Dates & Kes onse 10) Date Contacted 12/10/2015 11) Date Replied X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other I ribe /NHU Gontacteo I nroU n I GN5 3) Tribe /NHO FRN: 4) Tribe /NHO Name Tuscarora Nation act Name 5) First Name: Leo 6) MI: R 7) Last Name: Henry 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Chief va ca u ca Nvnac 10) Date Contacted 12/1012015 11) Date Replied X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other 3 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 0 Other Tribes /NHOs Contacted Tribe /NHO Information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 4) MI: 5) Last Name: 6) Suffix: 7) Title: rnntnrt Infnrmntinn 8) P.O Box: Or d 9) Street Address: 10) City: 11) State: 12) Zip Code: 13) Telephone Number: 14) Fax Number. 15) E -mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: E -mail Letter Both fates & Kesponse 17) Date Contacted 18) Date Replied No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other 9 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Properties Identified Historic Properties E 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of Yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes /NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? Yes (X ) No If "Yes ", you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. istoric Property 4) Property Name: Third Battle of Winchester Site 5) SHPO Site Number: 034 -0456 Property Address 6) Street Address: N/A 7) City: Winchester 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 22602 10) County /Borough /Parish: FREDERICK Rtntim R Flinihilitv 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: VCRIS database X ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? Yes ( X ) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): No Effect on this Historic Property in APE X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): No Effect on this Historic Property in APE X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 10 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Properties Identified Historic Properties 0 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APEs for direct and visual effect? X ) Yes ( ) No 2) Has the identification process located archaeological materials that would be directly affected, or sites that are of Yes ( X ) No cultural or religious significance to Tribes /NHOs? 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual effect? Yes (X ) No If "Yes you are required to attach a Cultural Resources Report in lieu of adding the Historic Property below. istoric Property 4) Property Name: Apple Pie Ridge / West Fort Parcel / Second Winchester Battlefield 5) SHPO Site Number: 034 -5023 Property Address 6) Street Address: N/A 7) City: Winchester 8) State: VA 9) Zip Code: 22602 10) County /Borough /Parish: FREDERICK Rtntlic R Plinihility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? Source: Yes ( X ) No 12) Is this property eligible for listing on the National Register? Source: VCRIS database X ) Yes ( ) No 13) Is this property a National Historic Landmark? Yes X No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): No Effect on this Historic Property in APE X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): No Effect on this Historic Property in APE X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE I I of I5 FCC Form 620 May 2014 0 ocai uovernmeni agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): Local Government Involvement 2) Name: Planning Department of Frederick County Contact Name 40 3) First Name: Eric 4) MI: 5) Last Name: Lawrence 6) Suffix: 7) Title: Director Cnntnrt Infnrmatinn 8) P O. Box fAO dT Street Address: 107 North Kent Street 1o) City: Winchester 11) State: VA 12) Zip Code: 22601 13) Telephone Number: (540)665 -5651 14) Nmber: 15) E -mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: E -mail X ) Letter Both fates & Kesponse 17) Date Contacted 12/04/2015 18) Date Replied X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other Arirtitinnal Infnrmatinn 19) Information on local government's role or interest (optional): 13 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Other Consulting Parties utner Consumng Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and invited to become a consulting party? ( X ) yes ( ) No L.onsuiung Party 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN)- 3) Name: Winchester- Frederick County Historical Society Contact Name 4) First Name: N/A 5) MI: 6) Last Name. N/A 7) Suffix: 8) Title: Contact Information 9) P.O. Box: to Street Address: 1340 S. Pleasant Valley Road 11) City: Winchester 12) State: VA 13) Zip Code: 22601 14) Telephone Number: (530)662 -6550 15) Fax Number: 16) E -mail Address: 17) Preferred means of communication: E -mail X ) Letter Both 1dLes a r[t:bPU11JC 18) Date Contacted 12/04/2015 X ) No Reply Replied /No Interest Replied /Have Interest Replied /Other Additional Information 19) Date Replied 20) Information on other consulting parties' role or interest (optional): 13 of 15 FCC Fonn 620 May 2014 Designation of SHPO/THPO 1) Designate the Lead State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) based on the location of the tower. SHPOITHPO Name Virginia Department of Historic Resources 2) You may also designate up to three additional SHPOs /THPOs if the APES include multiple states. If the APES include other countries, enter the name of the National Historic Preservation Agency and any state and provincial Historic Preservation Agency. SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: SHPO/THPO Name: Certification I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 620 Submission Packet and the accompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: MI: Last Name: Suffix: Signature. Date: FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMISSAL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFEITURE OF ANY FEES PAID. WILLFUL FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM OR ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PUNISHABLE BY FINE AND /OR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) AND /OR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION LICENSE OR CONSTRUCTION PERMIT (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 312(a)(1)), AND /OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section 503). 14 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 Attachments: Type Description Date Entered 15 of 15 FCC Form 620 May 2014 0 6 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 1. Consultant Information Provide a current copy of the resume or curriculum vitae for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in this filing. A current copy of the resume for the Principal Investigator and any researcher or other person who contributed to, reviewed, or provided significant input into the research, analysis, writing or conclusions presented in this filing is attached. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 0 SINCE 1981 OIL' XIql Historic Preservation Services Fame Tori Bedingfield Title Archaeological Field Technician Primary Responsibilities Assist with archaeological fieldwork and surveys, assist with telecommunications fieldwork and research, assist with report writing Years Experience: With This Firm 1 With Other Firms 3 Education Institution Degree(s) Year Specialization Queen's University M.A. Queen's University University of Alberta University of Victoria B.A. 2014 2012 Classical Archaeology Archaeology Field School 2011 & 2010 Archaeology Field School 2011 Anthropology and Greek and Roman Studies Ms. Bedingfield has experience conducting a variety of archaeological surveys, from Phase I through Phase III historic and prehistoric investigations, as well as conducting background research and file searches for historic and precontact sites for specific projects. Ms. Bedingfield has aided in the writing and preparation of reports for completed archaeological investigations and surveys. Selected Projects: Telecommunications Projects: Telecommunications projects have entailed the completion of archaeological fieldwork followed by the preparation of archaeological summary reports to aid in completion of the FCC 620 and 621 forms. Ms. Bedingfield has conducted work for these projects throughout the Mid - Atlantic including, but not limited to, the following states: Maryland, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. CHRS, Historic Preservation Archaeology - Historic Preservation - Research Name Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. - RPA Title Principal Primary Responsibilities Principal Investigator, Research, QA/QC review Years Experience: With This Firm 33 With Other Firms 4 Education Institution Degree(s) Year Specialization Temple University Ph.D. 1994 Anthropology Temple University M.A. 1980 Anthropology/Hist. Archaeology University of Pennsylvania B.A. 1976 Anthropology Organizations: American Cultural Resources Association; Council on Maryland Archaeology, Pennsylvania Archaeological Council; National Trust for Historic Preservation; Society for Historical Archaeology; American Anthropological Association; Society for Industrial Archaeology; Vernacular Architecture Forum, Archaeological Society of Maryland, Society for Pennsylvania Archaeology, Archaeological Society of Virginia, Archaeological Society of New Jersey, Society for the History of Technology Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. has directed historical and archaeological investigations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia for clients in state and federal government, as well as private industry. He has directed cultural resource management projects at all levels of effort. This work has included the preparation of Historic Contexts, Historic and Prehistoric Models, Historic Resource Surveys, Determination of Eligibility and Criteria of Effect Reports, Section 4(f), Section 2002, and HABS/HAER documentation, a variety of other related historic tasks, and Phase I, Phase II, and Phase III Archaeological Surveys. Dr. Basalik's expertise is in history and historical archaeology. Although his specialty lies in 19c'- century material culture, his research has spanned from the early eighteenth to the mid - twentieth century. He has conducted Phase I, II, and III level projects on domestic, industrial, and urban site types. Dr. Basalik also has extensive experience in Middle Atlantic prehistory. He has directed Phase III level projects on prehistoric sites dating from the Late Archaic to the Contact period. Preliminary seed analysis, faunal analysis, and micro -wear analysis of lithics are technical skills he brings to the evaluation of prehistoric sites. As President of CHRS, Dr. Basalik has administered more than 1000 projects. These projects have included small scale bridge projects and intersection improvements as well as large area -wide surveys for pipelines, and roadways on new alignment. He has a reputation for producing high- quality products performed within tight time frames at reasonable cost. His responsibilities include project administration, research, analysis, report writing, and review. Selected Reports 2011 - Pennsylvania Turnpike (I -76), Beaver River Bridge Project, Big Beaver Borough, Homewood Borough, and North Sewickley Township, Beaver County, Pennsylvania with Justin McKissick and Philip Ruth. Report Submitted Maguire Group, Pittsburgh, PA Pennsylvania Turnpike (I -76), Milepost 320 -326 Reconstruction and Widening Project, Tredyffrin Township and Upper Merion Township, Chester and Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania with Justin McKissick and Philip Ruth. Report Submitted STV, Inc., Douglassville, PA Phase IA Archaeological Survey, Fishermen's Atlantic City Wind farm, LLC 20 MW Offshore Wind Energy Project, Atlantic City, Atlantic County, New Jersey with Philip Ruth. Report submitted AMEC Earth & Environmental, Somerset, New Jersey Phase IA Archaeological Survey, New Windsor Quarry Expansion, New Windsor Township, Carroll County, Maryland with Justin McKissick and Philip Ruth. report submitted to the Lehigh Cement Company, Union Bridge Maryland. Delaware Department of Transportation U.S. Route 301 Mainline Contract 3: Maryland/Delaware State Line to North of Levels Road, St. Georges and Appoquinimink Hundreds and Town of Middletown New Castle County, Delaware and Electoral District 1 Cecil County, Maryland Phase II Archaeological Management Summary Report Sites 7NC -F -118 and 7NC -F -119 with Justin McKissick report submitted DeIDOT, Dover, DE Delaware Department of Transportation U.S. Route 301 Mainline Contract 3: Maryland/Delaware State Line to North of Levels Road, St. Georges and Appoquinimink Hundreds and Town of Middletown New Castle County, Delaware and Electoral District 1 Cecil County, Maryland Phase II Archaeological Management Summary Report Site 7NC -F -155 with Justin McKissick report submitted De1DOT, Dover, DE Bridge 3 -368, Sycamore Road over Elliott Pond Branch, Replacement Project Broad Creek Hundred, Sussex County, Delaware Phase Ia Archaeological Survey. with Philip Ruth report submitted De1DOT, Dover, DE 2012 - Phase 1/II Archaeological Survey Report Pennsylvania Turnpike (I -76), Total Reconstruction Project: Milepost 320 -326 Tredyffrin Township and Upper Merion Township, Chester and Montgomery Counties, Pennsylvania with Rachael Fowler, Justin D. McKissick, Philip Ruth and Thomas R. Lewis. Report submitted STV, Inc., Douglasville, Pennsylvania Phase Ia Archaeological Survey New Windsor Quarry Expansion, New Windsor Township, Carroll County, Maryland. with Justin D. McKissick, and Philip Ruth. Report submitted Lehigh Cement Company, LLC, Union Bridge, Maryland Phase I Archaeological Survey New Windsor Quarry Expansion: Conveyor Line Alignment, New Windsor Township, Carroll County, Maryland. with Rachael Fowler, and Philip Ruth. Report submitted Lehigh Cement Company, LLC, Union Bridge, Maryland Phase II Archaeological Survey Report Sites 7NC -F -118, 7NC -F -119, and 7NC -F -155, Delaware Department of Transportation U.S. Route 301 Mainline Contract 3: Maryland/Delaware State Line to North of Levels Road, St. Georges and Appoquinimink Hundreds and Town of Middletown New Castle County, Delaware and Electoral District 1 Cecil County, Maryland, with Justin McKissick and Philip Ruth. Report submitted Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, Delaware. Phase III (Data Recovery) Archaeological Survey Report Site 36mg0395, S.R. 0422, Section M02 Transportation Improvement Project Montgomery and Chester Counties, Pennsylvania with Thomas R. Lewis. Report submitted GTS Technologies, Harrisburg, PA. Phase II Archaeological Survey Report - The Beaver Turnpike Site (36BV0043), Pennsylvania Turnpike (I -76), Beaver River Bridge Project, Big Beaver Borough, Homewood Borough, and North Sewickley Township, Beaver County, Pennsylvania with Thomas R. Lewis. Report Submitted CDRMaguire, Pittsburgh, PA 2013 - Archaeological Overview and Assessment, Paterson Great Falls National Historical Park, Paterson, New Jersey, PMIS 163542, with Thomas R. Lewis and Philip Ruth. Report submitted National Park Service, Lowell, MA. 0 0 Phase I Archaeological Survey, Wolf Bridge Road Bridge Project, (Cumberland County Bridge No. C -11), Middlesex Township, Cumberland County, Pennsylvania with Rachael Fowler and Philip Ruth. Report submitted HRG Engineering, Harrisburg, PA Pennsylvania Historical Resource Survey Form, Springton/Geist Reservoir, Delaware County, Pennsylvania. with Elizabeth Beeman. Submitted Gannett Fleming, Inc., Valley Forge Pennsylvania Phase I Archaeological Survey, Park Boulevard over Spring Creek, Derry Township Project, Derry Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania with Rachael Fowler and Philip Ruth. Report submitted HRG Engineering, Harrisburg, PA Phase I and Phase II Archaeological Investigations, S.R. 4033, Section UCB, Upper Ridge Road Over Unami Creek, Milford Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania with Alan Beauregard, Lauren Cook, and Philip Ruth. Submitted Gannett Fleming, Inc., Valley Forge Pennsylvania Darby Paoli Road Bridges over Little Darby Creek and Wigwam Run Project, Radnor Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania Determination of Effects Memo. Submitted Patrick Engineering, Newtown, PA Pennsylvania Historical Resource Survey Form, Ellis - Hadfield Property, Chester County, Pennsylvania. with Christine Miller Cruiess. Submitted Michael Baker, Jr. Hatfield, Pennsylvania Phase I/Il Archaeological Survey S.R. 0273 Multi -Use Trail Facility Project, New Castle, New Castle County, Delaware with Rachael Fowler and Philip Ruth. Report submitted Delaware Department of Transportation, Dover, DE Pennsylvania Historical Resource Survey Forms, Tookany Creek Parkway and McCann Property, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania. with Elizabeth Beeman. Submitted Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, District 6 -0, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania Phase I Archaeological Survey, Chester Creek Interceptor Expansion, Middletown Township, Delaware County, Pennsylvania with Thomas R. Lewis, Rachael Fowler and Philip Ruth. Report submitted Bradford Engineering, Aston, Pennsylvania Phase I Archaeological Survey, Philadelphia Housing Authority (PHA), Queen Lane Apartments Project, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania with Rachael Fowler and Philip Ruth. Report submitted Philadelphia Housing Authority, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 0 C Historic PreservationHRSServices Arc'haeolovil • Historic Preser- ntron - Rcsc'rzrch Name Maureen Anne McDougall Title Architectural Historian Primary Responsibilities Historic Resources Survey, National Register Eligibility determinations, research and writing Years Experience: With This Firm 3 With Other Firms 2.5 Education Institution Degree(s) University of Pennsylvania M.S. New York University M.A. New York University B.A. Overview of Expertise: Year 2009 2003 2000 Specialization Historic Preservation Humanities and Social Thought Anthropology and Archaeology Ms. McDougall meets the qualifications for Architectural Historian under the standards set forth by the Secretary of the Interior. Ms. McDougall has experience conducting a variety of historic architectural studies, including Historic Resource Surveys, Criteria of Effect Reports and Memoranda of Agreement. Ms. McDougall has undertaken all levels of historic resource studies from preliminary reconnaissance -level surveys to intensive -level studies. Resources documented have included farmsteads, commercial properties, industrial properties, transportation resources, and residential properties. Ms. McDougall has surveyed and evaluated various types of historic resources, including districts, buildings, structures, sites, and objects for their significance according to National Register of Historic Places criteria. Ms. McDougall's experience includes work at T. Paterno Conservation, LLC, conducting conditions assessments of various materials, including plaster, stone, stucco, and terrazzo in a 1920s theater in Times Square; testing conditions treatments; sampling finishes; and writing specifications for conservation work. Ms. McDougall's experience also includes work at Milner and Carr Conservation, LLC, conducting masonry repair and conservation treatments on eighteenth- and nineteenth - century grave markers in cemeteries in New Jersey. At the University of Pennsylvania's Architectural Conservation Laboratory, Ms. McDougall worked on the conservation of earthen surface finishes at Mesa Verde National Park, supervising conditions documentation in the field and creation of drawings in AutoCAD and ArcGIS, as well as compiled project reports. Ms. McDougall is also skilled in the production of architectural quality drawings, including work in AutoCAD, Photoshop and InDesign. Ms. McDougall currently serves on the Historic Preservation Advisory Board for the Township of Cranford, New Jersey. Select Project Experience: Telecommunications Projects: Ms. McDougall is skilled in the completion of 620 and 621 Forms in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's Programmatic Agreement for collocations and raw land sites. Ms. McDougall is also familiar with the requirements and process for the completion of a -106 forms. Ms. McDougall has conducted architectural and archaeological evaluations for projects throughout the Mid - Atlantic, Mid -West, West and South, and has completed the necessary training to conduct research at various State Historic Preservation Offices throughout the country. 0 0 HistoricCHRSInc, Services Archaeology • Historic Prc'sc'1 i7ation • Resc on It Name Rachael E. Fowler Title Project Archaeologist, RPA Primary Responsibilities Years Experience: With This Firm 5 With Other Firms 1 Education Institution Degree(s) Year Specialization Temple University M.A. 2008 Art History (Archaeology concentration) Via Lingua Prague Certificate 2001 TEFL Certificate Tyler School of Art B.F.A. 1998 Painting Ms. Fowler has experience conducting a variety of archaeological surveys, from Phase I through Phase III historic and prehistoric investigations, as well as conducting background research and file searches for historic and prehistoric sites for various projects. Ms. Fowler has aided in the writing and preparation of reports for completed archaeological investigations and surveys. Ms. Fowler has conducted Phase I surveys throughout the United States including Pennsylvania, Arizona, Delaware, Colorado and Texas, as well as in France and Greece. Ms. Fowler has competency of the French (reading, some speaking), Italian (reading, some speaking) and German (reading) languages. Ms. Fowler is a Registered Public Archaeologist (RPA). Telecommunications Projects: Telecommunications projects have entailed the completion of all reports to aid in completion of the FCC 620 and 621 Forms. Ms. Fowler has conducted archaeological work for these projects throughout the Mid - Atlantic, Mid -West and the South. Ms. Fowler has also assisted with research in support of the cultural resources evaluations for project sites. Ms. Fowler has completed the necessary training to conduct research at various State Historic Preservation Offices, including earning the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation Section 106 Principles and Practice Certificate of Training. Ms. Fowler is skilled in the completion of 620 and 621 Forms in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission's Programmatic Agreement for collocations and raw land sites. Ms. Fowler is also familiar with the requirements and process for the completion of a -106 forms. S.R. 0078, Section 12M Improvement Project, Greenwich Township, Berks County, Pennsylvania. This large -scale undertaking involved Phase I/II Archaeological Surveys along an 8 -mile stretch of highway. Additional archaeological work (currently in process) includes additional Phase I /II survey work for wetland mitigation basin and additional widening. Ms. Fowler is responsible for the additional archaeological work being conducted. Her responsibilities include fieldwork, staff supervision, analysis and report writing. S.R. 0422, Sections M01 -M03, Transportation Improvement Project: This multi -county transportation project included the completion of multiple Phase I and 11 Archaeological surveys. Current work involves the completion of a Phase III precontact archaeological site along the Schuylkill River in Chester County Pennsylvania. Ms. Fowler is responsible for supervising the fieldwork as well as assisting with the analysis and report writing. NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 2. Site Information — Photographs You are required to provide photographs and maps as part of this filing. Additional site information can be provided in an optional attachment. Photograph Requirements: Except in cases where no Historic Properties were identified within the Areas of Potential Effects, submit photographs as described below. Photographs should be in color, marked so as to identify the project, keyed to the relevant map or text, and dated; the focal length of the lens and the height of the camera should be noted. The source of any photograph included but not taken by the Applicant or its consultant including copies of historic images) should be identified on the photograph. a. Photographs taken from the site should show views from the proposed location in all directions. The direction (e.g., north, south, etc.) should be indicated on each photograph, and, as a group, the photographs should present a complete (360 degree) view of the area around the proposed site. Please see attached Photographs 1 -9, which were taken by Ms. Tori Bedingfield, MA, Archaeology Field Technician, of CHRS, Inc. on December 11, 2015, unless otherwise noted. b. Photographs of all listed in and eligible properties within the Areas of Potential Effects. Please see attached Photographs 10, 11, and 12, which were taken by Ms. Tori Bedingfield, MA, Archaeology Field Technician, of CHRS, Inc. on December 11, 2015, unless otherwise noted. c. If any listed or eligible properties are visible from the proposed site, photographs looking at the site from each historic property. The approximate distance in feet (meters) between the site and the historic property should be included. If any listed or eligible properties are within the APE, photos looking at each historic property should be included. Please see attached Photographs 13 and 14, which were taken by Ms. Tori Bedingfield, MA, Archaeology Field Technician, of CHRS, Inc. on December 11, 2015, unless otherwise noted. Aerial photograph of the site was obtained by using Google Earth, imagery is dated 2013. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 0 0 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 0 0 NT SUBMISSION PACKET —FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET— FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates 7. View of the proposed monopole location, facing south. 8. View of the proposed monopole location, facing west. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 9. View of the proposed access easement, facing southwest. 10. View showing existing residential development within the portions of the Third Battle of Winchester Site ID# 034 -0456) and the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034- 5023) located within the project APE, looking east. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET— FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 11. View showing existing commercial development within the portions of the Third Battle of Winchester Site ID# 034 -0456) and the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034 -5023) located within the project APE, looking south - southwest. 12. Aerial view showing the proposed project APE. Note the existing development r within the portions of the Third Battle of kv Il Winchester Site I D# 034 -0456) and the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034- 5023) that are located within the project APE Google Earth 2013). Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 9 9 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 9 9 Site Location & Surrounding Properties Site Location - - - - _ Easement Aerial Photographs Verizon Wireless Aerial Photograph , TRILEAFShenandoahHills2013 143 Greenwood Road ENVIRONMENTAL & PROPERTY CONSULTANTS Winchester, Virginia 22602 9 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 3. Site Information — Map Requirements Include one or more 7.5- minute quad USGS topographical maps that: a. Identify the Areas of Potential Effects for both Direct and Visual Effects. If a map is copied from the original, include a key with the name of quad and date. b. Show the location of the proposed site and any access roads or other easements including excavations. c. Show the locations of each property listed. d. Include keys for any symbols, colors, or other identifiers. e. Submit color maps whenever possible. The following maps have been attached to this report: Topographic Map 0.5 -mile Area of Potential Effect Map Architectural /Archaeological Resources within the APE for Visual Effects Map V -CRIS Map Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 Stephenson, VA -WV (DeLorme 1987) Contour Interval = 50 Feet Scale 1 Inch = -2,000 Feet Latitude: 39° 11' 12.58" Longitude: 78° 06' 39.644" North lr sl NZ 11 ViJi zJ .tip , J,. / s} .°.c_ •.. _ Q — •i +l r . -_ p,ji tb \ IRC,p r `ttO r (• D'r Z I` L 4tc c i ,\ 0 . \ r _ tl YYYVltitir r'' a vii f 1 zoff'. it c-:,. '...•^ p ' a ' NAV Site Location "i tom: tiw ly tl '.' • ro . rJR rt — .4 E' 1 too l. =•w ""• ° t r , Tt i ty i ,MAY4CI i' ' r ` •' :' -' G • rr Aft S - A_ _ C ' r - ti[ RO ch m S PRIMROSE i ^ PRIMROSE PL m ._ r v'" ` ALPINE MEADOW F 1 tov , 63i J %a 0/ O k" C• T H USGS Topographic Map - Location Map n n Wireless Shea 40 TRI LEAFShenandoahHills 143 Greenwood Road ENVIRONMENTAL 6 PROPERTY CONSULTANTS Winchester, Virginia 22602 d j 1 -., y \., _ _ __ -^- t1 Qom! • i ,i iirt ' ?• grp / tt u rr rrrt• u JN1 i I , `. • ..... I 9 1, Ira. , ° ,-. mot \l o 0.5 -MILE APE BM• 643 u .Ci 'A Am 3J. r PROPOSED MONOPOLE LOCATION s IA 659' A h rams y 500 ( ! z- a t t -.._;_ ice"} r ` __ •,. s "H U Creeowwd / i ! Ocn AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS 74 rl 6 \ eoc SCALE SOURCE Oft 2000ft USGS 1997a Y= STEPHENSON,VA -WV N Om 609.6m USGS 1997b WINCHESTER, VA -WV Prepared by CHRS, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION MAP 0 0 PROPOSED MONOPOLE LOCATION 0.5 -MILE APE d 3 J ± / !1 a C g it VV AhPIE RIDG E/WEST FORT PARCEUSECOND WINCHESTER BATTLEFIELD (ID# 034 -5023) PROPOSED MONOPOL - _. E LOCATION \ .} J PC 10 L 1 s f 13 t t PROPOSED MONOPOLE THIRD BATTLE OF WINCHESTER SITE ([D# 034 -0456) ``.,. I LOCATION T • s 4 AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS \ PHOTO LOCATION SCALE SOURCE Ott 1170ft USGS 1997 STEPHENSON, VA -WV N Om 356.6m Prepared by CHRS, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION MAP r NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 4. Site Information — Additional Site Information Describe any additional structures, access roads, utility lines, fences, easements, or other construction planned for the site. The project is located at 143 Greenwood Road, approximately 610 feet southeast of the intersection of Greenwood Road and Berryville Pike, in a grassy area behind a church, in a moderately developed and moderately treed section of Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The terrain around the Subject Property is hilly, with varying degrees of slope. Verizon Wireless is proposing the construction of a 50 -foot by 50 -foot telecommunications compound within which a 155 -foot monopole will be installed. A generator, cabinet and additional equipment will be mounted atop a 12 -foot by 17 -foot canopied slab within the lease area. A mesa cabinet and meter center will also be placed within the lease area. An access easement, spanning approximately 531 feet by 12 feet, will connect the lease area to an existing paved area. The construction drawings provided by Verizon Wireless are included in this attachment. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 EXHIBIT (PAGE 1 OF 3) 7r'1I TELEGF T ENGINF,ERING INC 2-116 Commerce Read, suite 1 Forest Bill, MD 21050 410-602 -5816 wl -ene. rom SITE PLAN OscriL: r = zso' TRUE NORTH I/ ntr ex communication services, inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive, Suite 550 Bethesda, MD 20817 Phone: 202 -408 -0960 Fax: 202 -408.0961 LEASE EXHIBIT SHENANDOAH HILLS GRACE BRETHREN CHURCH 143 GREENWOOD RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22602 MILE SITE PLAN PROJECT N0. 1 1102.272 TEI TELEG&\7 ENGONEER.0 G INc 2-116 Commerce Rnad, Suite 1 Forest Hill, I D 21030 410 - 692.5816 w vw.tel- enR.com Irx — x —x x I x I- 3, eATmn 4- x OOVOr \ rASeT J x I I ratp `- x LLESSEE'S EQUIPMENT ON A x 12'- 0'.17 -0' SUB ON GRADE I WITH A CANOPY EXHIBIT A (PAGE 2 of 3) NEW LANDSCAPING TREE, TYR. 50' r-- LESSEE'S 8' HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCE x— x— x— x— x— x X I x x I X I ; X' X 7M"ESABIET I. . X. a.. -. X. L-- x— x- X- x— x— x —x —xl x— x— x— x— x— x— x— x-1 X LESSEE'S MONOPOLE ..,x X LESSEE'S EASEMENT FOR 24/7 INGRESS/ EGRESS COMPOUND PLAN OSCALE: 3/32' =1' TRUE NORTH ep ntrex communication services, inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive, Suite 550 Bethesda, MD 20817 Phone: 202-408-0960 Fax: 202-408 -0961 0 o"'dr bt LEASE EXHIBIT SHENANDOAH HILLS GRACE BRETHREN CHURCH 143 GREENWOOD RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22602 TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN PROJECT N0, I 1102.272 LESSEE'S CABLE BRIDGE X WITH 2 CPS ANTENNAS x I I x I X I x I x I X I x I X I X I LESSEE'S x METER CENTER I LESSEE'S 12' MDE GATE 1 X x— x— x— x- x —x---Ix— x— LESSEE'S EASEMENT FOR 24/7 INGRESS/ EGRESS COMPOUND PLAN OSCALE: 3/32' =1' TRUE NORTH ep ntrex communication services, inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive, Suite 550 Bethesda, MD 20817 Phone: 202-408-0960 Fax: 202-408 -0961 0 o"'dr bt LEASE EXHIBIT SHENANDOAH HILLS GRACE BRETHREN CHURCH 143 GREENWOOD RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22602 TITLE: COMPOUND PLAN PROJECT N0, I 1102.272 TE11 TELEcwr E.\,aNEERL \G INC 21-76 C-- Road, Suite 1 Fo Hill,MID?1030 4I0fi0'_ -5816 www.txl_. vm I entrex communication services, inc. 6600 Rockledge Drive, Suite 550 Bethesda, MD 20817 Phone: 202 -408 -0960 Fax: 202408 -0961 LEASE EXHIBIT SHENANDOAH HILLS GRACE BRETHREN CHURCH 143 GREENWOOD RD. WINCHESTER, VA 22602 TITLE: MONOPOLE ELEVATION PROJECT N0. 1102.272 9 9 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 5. Area of Potential Effects You are required to provide two attachments regarding the Determination of Effect: Areas of Potential Effect and Mitigation of Effect (if applicable). Areas of Potential Effect Guidelines: a. Describe the APE for direct effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for direct effects is defined as the area of potential ground disturbance and any property, or any portion thereof that will be physically altered or destroyed by the undertaking. Verizon Wireless is proposing the construction of a 50 -foot by 50 -foot telecommunications compound within which a 155 -foot monopole will be installed. A generator, cabinet and additional equipment will be mounted atop a 12 -foot by 17 -foot canopied slab within the lease area. A mesa cabinet and meter center will also be placed within the lease area. An access easement, spanning approximately 531 feet by 12 feet, will connect the lease area to an existing paved area. Total acreage of the project area is approximately 0.2 acres. b. Describe the APE for visual effects and explain how this APE was determined. The APE for visual effects is the geographic area in which the Project has the potential to introduce visual elements that diminish or alter the setting, including the landscape, where the setting is a character - defining feature of a historic property that makes it eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The presumed APE for visual effects for construction of new facilities is the area from which the tower will be visible. Due to the height of the proposed undertaking (155 feet), the presumed APE for visual effects for this project is a 0.5 -mile radius from the tower site. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 0 9 NT SUBMISSION PACKET— FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment S. Continued Mitigation of Effect Guidelines: In the case of where an Adverse Visual Effect or Adverse Direct Effect has been determined you must provide the following: a. Copies of any correspondence and summaries of any oral communication with the SHPO /THPO and any consulting parties. N/A b. Describe any alternatives that have been considered that might avoid, minimize, or mitigate any adverse effects. Explain the Applicant's conclusion regarding the feasibility of each alternative. N/A For each property identified as a Historic Property in the online a -106 form: a. Indicate whether the Applicant believes the proposed undertaking would have a) no effect; b) no adverse effect; or, c) an adverse effect. Explain how each such assessment was made. Provide supporting documentation where necessary. A search of the online files of the Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V -CRIS) revealed two resources located within the APE for direct effects. The proposed project is situated within the mapped boundaries of the Third Battle of Winchester Site (ID# 034 -0456) and Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034 - 5023). Both the Third Battle of Winchester Site (ID# 034 -0456) and Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034 -5023) have been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. No archaeological artifacts were encountered during the field survey. A finding of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects is recommended. No further archaeological work is recommended. Based on a review of files that identify Historic Properties in the APE for visual effects, two Historic Properties have been identified within the APE for visual effects. A finding of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties within the APE for visual effects is recommended. Please see the attached Archaeology report. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 SINCE 1981 CHRS, Inc' Historic Preservation Services Phase I Archaeological Survey TRILEAF Corporation Site# 619112 (Shenandoah Hills) Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia by Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. Cultural Heritage Research Services, Inc. Principal Investigator: Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. Cultural Heritage Research Services, Inc. 451 N. Cannon Ave., Suite 10013 Lansdale, PA 19446 215- 699 -8006 (Voice) kbasalik@chrsinc.com 12/16/15 Kenneth J. EVasalik, Ph.D. Date Federal Agency: Federal Communications Commission December 2015 451 N. Cannon Ave., Suite 100B Lansdale, PA 19446 -2256 www.chrsinc.com Prepared for: Sara Levy TRILEAF Corporation 8600 LaSalle Road, Suite 301 Towson, MD 21286 410 - 853 -7128 (Voice) s.levy @trileaf.corn rel.: 215 - 699 -8006 Fax: 215 - 699 -8901 Email: KBasalik@chrsinc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ABSTRACT U Pabe i ii iii INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT AND AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS 1 PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND SUMMARY OF KNOWN SITES 1 FIELD METHODS 15 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 REFERENCES CITED 17 APPENDIX A: SHOVEL TEST FORMS 21 0 0 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Title Page 1 Project Location Map 6 2 Archaeological Test Locations and Photograph Locations Map 14 Photo 1 Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing north. 7 2 Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing east. 7 3 Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing south. 8 4 Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing west. 8 5 Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing north. 9 6 Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing east. 9 7 Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing south. 10 8 Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing west. 10 9 Overview of the proposed access easement, facing southwest. 11 10 Example of a disturbance encountered in the proposed project location. 12 11 Representative shovel test pit profile. 13 11 ABSTRACT This archaeological summary documents the results of an archaeological survey performed for the TRILEAF Corporation Site# 619112 (Shenandoah Hills). The proposed monopole location is situated at 143 Greenwood Road, approximately 185.9 meters (610 feet) southeast of the intersection of Greenwood Road and Berryville Pike, in a grassy area behind a church, in a moderately developed and moderately treed section of Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. This archaeological survey was conducted to ensure that potentially significant archaeological resources are not located within the area impacted by the proposed project. This document is being submitted in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement For Review Of Effects On Historic Properties For Certain Undertakings Approved By The Federal Communications Commission" (FCC 2004). The information is being submitted as part of the required New Tower (NT) Submission Packet, Form 620. Fifteen shovel test pits were excavated. No artifacts were recovered. No archaeological sites were identified and no additional archaeological work is recommended. IM C J INTRODUCTION TO THE PROJECT AND AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS This archaeological summary documents the results of an archaeological survey performed for TRILEAF Corporation Site# 619112 (Shenandoah Hills) in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia Figure 1; USGS 1997a, 1997b). This document is being submitted in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement For Review Of Effects On Historic Properties For Certain Undertakings Approved By The Federal Communications Commission" (FCC 2004). The information is being submitted as part of the required New Tower (NT) Submission Packet, Form 620. The proposed monopole location is situated at 143 Greenwood Road, approximately 185.9 meters (610 feet) southeast of the intersection of Greenwood Road and Berryville Pike, in a grassy area behind a church, in a moderately developed and moderately treed section of Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. The proposed project location is situated on an upland hill slope. The proposed project consists of constructing a 15.24 -meter by 15.24 -meter (50 -foot by 50 -foot) telecommunications compound within which a 47.2 -meter (155 -foot) monopole will be installed. A generator, cabinet and additional equipment will be mounted within a 3.65 -meter by 5.18 -meter 12 -foot by 17 -foot) canopied slab within the lease area. A mesa cabinet and meter center will also be placed within the lease area. An access easement, spanning approximately 161.9 meters by 3.65 meters (531.4 feet by 12 feet) will connect the lease area to an existing paved area. The archaeological Area of Potential Effects (APE) lies within the Middle section of the Valley and Ridge physiographic province (USGS 2003). The archaeological APE consists of an area measuring approximately 0.08 hectares (0.2 acres) within which the proposed lease area and access easement will be constructed (Figure 2; Photographs 1 through 10). The archaeological survey was conducted to ensure that potentially significant archaeological resources are not located within the area impacted by the proposed project. An examination of the online files of the Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V- CRIS) was conducted on December 4, 2015. Archaeological fieldwork was performed on December 11, 2015 by Ms. Tori Bedingfield, MA, CHRS, Inc. Archaeology Field Technician. Ms. Bedingfield has over 4 years of archaeological experience. Fieldwork was managed and overseen by Ms. Rachael Fowler, MA, RPA, CHRS, Inc. Archaeologist. Ms. Fowler has over 5 years of experience conducting archaeological investigations throughout the Middle Atlantic region. Kenneth J. Basalik, Ph.D. acted as Principal Investigator. Approximately seven hours were spent in the field. No archaeological sites were identified and no additional archaeological work is recommended. PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS AND SUMMARY OF KNOWN SITES Evidence recovered from precontact archaeological sites in the Middle Atlantic region has suggested the existence of four broadly defined cultural development periods. These are generally referred to as: Paleoindian, Archaic, Woodland, and Contact Period. The Archaic and Woodland Periods are further subdivided into Early, Middle, and Late categories. The four cultural development periods are perhaps best analyzed as a collection of responses to changing environmental and social conditions. This section presents brief overviews in order to provide contexts by which the possibility of a precontact component in the general study area can be assessed. The Paleoindian Period, 12,000 to 8,000 BC: Smaller mammals, such as deer and elk, likely played a prominent role in the Paleoindian diet. Recent evidence also points to a broader -based economy more dependent on fishing and foraging of vegetal foods (Custer 1990; Gardner 1981, 1989). The artifact distinctive to this tradition is the fluted projectile point; this point is lanceolate- shaped, with a central flake removed from both faces along its longitudinal axis. These points are also referred to as Clovis points, due to the similarity to other points from the western United States dating to roughly the same time frame (Custer 1996:93). Eastern Clovis points generally fall in the date range of 9,200 BC to 8,000 BC (Levine 1990; Custer and Stewart 1990). These points, with other related tools, have been found in association with various floral and faunal resources in sites across the eastern United States (Funk 1969; Gardner 1974; Dent and Kauffman 1978; McNett 1985). According to Gardner (1974, 1977, 1978), the model for Paleoindian settlement and subsistence patterns was influenced by the predominance of cryptocrystalline lithic material. The ability to produce fluted projectile points influenced site distribution, as well as the overall size and shape of exploitative territories. The size of these territories ranged from 48.3 kilometers to 112.7 kilometers (30 miles to 70 miles), with movements being cyclical around sources of lithic materials. In Custer's alternative model (Custer et al. 1983), Paleoindian settlement patterns were not dependent on large sources of cryptocrystalline material; rather, secondary sources of fine- grained fabric (pebbles and cobbles) were utilized while engaging in other subsistence activities. The Archaic Period, 8,000 to 1,000 BC: Changes in environmental constraints resulted in new subsistence strategies, as well as new resource procurement technologies. The warming climate, and the changes in available faunal resources, created impetus for the developments that characterize the transition to the Archaic Period. The Early Archaic (8,000 to 6,000 BC) is somewhat similar to the Paleoindian, and to a point represents a continuum. Archaic groups were engaged in analogous activities. Site data indicates that these groups were small, and highly mobile; habitation sites are extremely rare. The resources each group exploited varied on the basis of local availability. This factor, coupled with the types and quantities of the lithic materials employed in tool making, results in different artifact assemblages at different sites. The degree of variance makes it difficult to characterize a typical regional Archaic tool assemblage. Archaic assemblages, however, can be clearly distinguished from those of the preceding Paleoindian Period by the replacement of fluted projectile points by smaller points of cruder materials, along with the emergence of grinding and ground stone tools (axes, chisels, and gouges). Several new additions to the Native toolkit are diagnostic to the Middle Archaic (6,000 to 4,000 BC). These additions include atlatl weights, celts, woodworking adzes, and net sinkers (Louis Berger and Associates 1996:10). Changes in projectile point technology are also apparent. New point types include Kirk -like, Stanley stemmed, Morrow Mountain, Neville, and Stark (Kinsey et al. 1972; Kraft 1986; Ritchie and Funk 1971). Flat and pitted stones that may be associated with milling have also been found in Middle Archaic contexts. Custer posits that many of these tool 2 types may be representative of entirely new technologies, rather than being simple stone replications of earlier wood and bone tools (Custer 1996:150). A wider variety of lithic resources were employed during the Middle Archaic Period. Non - cryptocrystalline materials of lower quality (quartz, quartzite, rhyolite) are found in the archaeological record with increasing frequency. Settlement patterns also changed during the Middle Archaic. In general, sites are found in a wider variety of environments and locations. Wetlands were critical for the increase and nature of site locations. Site types also increased in variance. Middle Archaic groups could travel further in locating wetlands than their earlier predecessors; sites tend to reflect a period of increased mobility of small foraging groups (Louis Berger and Associates 1996:11). Mobility was correlated to a more elaborate planned scheduling of seasonal exploitation of environments (Snow 1980:183), and sites reflect the adaptation to these environments (Custer 1989:129 -131). Sites increased in size, frequency, and depositional intensity, suggesting that the population of the region as a whole, was increasing dramatically. Part of the technology shift was the increase in ground stone tools and their functions (Custer 1996:183). Tools such as adzes, celts, and axes increased in number and variety; these tools may be associated with the production of dugout canoes, as well as for clearing land for settlement and for firewood. Ground stone tools associated with the processing of plant food sources continued to increase during this period. An additional lithic technology change in the Late Archaic is the appearance of Broadspears Custer 1996:184). The presence of these tools may be representative of an increase in the number and variety of specialized tools found in the Late Archaic toolkit, particularly those made of distinctive raw materials. The production of Broadspears may be emblematic of a greater need for processing tools adapted to specific environments. Emphasis on narrow- bladed, notched and stemmed projectile points took place; examples of these points include Lackawaxen, Poplar Island, Lamoka, and Sylvan types. Stone bowls also appear in Late Archaic assemblages. These bowls could be placed directly on cooking fires, increasing cooking efficiency. Also, stone bowls were used for storage, which was particularly significant for the consumption of limited seasonally available resources during other parts of the year. Lithic material types increased in variety during the Late Archaic Period. Tools show an emphasis on the acquisition and usage of local materials such as quartzite and vein quartz. Settlement patterns also changed during the Late Archaic. Because of a decrease in precipitation and an increase in temperature, there is a general tendency towards establishment of base camps in areas with the most reliable sources of surface water. Storage pits and hearths first appear in the archaeological record of the Late Archaic (Custer 1996:186). McLearen (199 1) argues these features are indicative of a longer and more intensive occupation of base camp sites. Cavallo 1983, 1987) also argues that the presence of platform hearths is representative of a more focused use of riverine resources. The Woodland Period, 1,000 BC to AD 1600: By the beginning of the Early Woodland Period, an environment similar to that of the modern area had formed over the region. Sedentism had 3 increased, as had the overall population. The increased use of food resources such as nuts, seeds, and anadromous fish (ocean fish that breed in riverine environments) created a need for storage vessels (Dent 1995; Reinhart and Hodges 1992). Chipped stone tools are not securely diagnostic in the identification of Early and Middle Woodland Period assemblages. Stemmed and notched variety projectile point technology types, particularly Adena points, are continuous from the Late Archaic to Middle Woodland. Other types, however, are somewhat more diagnostic to the Woodland Periods. Custer posits a point chronology that includes Lagoon, Meadowwood, Fox Creek, and triangle points (Custer 1996:229). Large bifaces that are frequently present in burial /cache contexts may also facilitate identification of Early and Middle Woodland assemblages. Changes in both ceramic and lithic styles and technologies can be used to identify and characterize Late Woodland Period (AD 1000 to AD 1650) sites. By AD 1000, only triangular points that first appeared during the Middle Woodland were present in the Late Woodland toolkit. The presence of these smaller points may be related to the appearance of the bow and arrow in Middle Atlantic contexts (Custer 1996:265). More complex treatments and finishes, including incised lines and cord - wrapped stick impressions, appear on various vessel types. The Contact Period, AD 1600 to AD 1750: Identification of the exact beginning of the Contact Period is problematic. Some researchers coordinate the beginning of this period with the date when trade between Native groups and Europeans began (Custer 1984). Because of the degree in variation between hypothesized beginning dates, a generalized date range is from ca. AD 1600 to AD 1750, when most Native populations had either been displaced or removed from Eastern Pennsylvania. According to Custer (1996) and Black (1992), Native populations had been genetically isolated from the rest of the world for over 10,000 years; these groups were genetically homogenous from European peoples, and had not had opportunity to experience similar health disasters and develop immunities to diseases before the arrival of Europeans in the Western World. As a result, diseases introduced both directly and indirectly to Native populations had drastic results. Numerous epidemics spread through the Middle Atlantic region, devastating the overall population (Black 1992:1739). The overall percentage of population depletion may have ranged between 50 to 75 percent per century (Custer 1996:303), forcing the deterioration of previous cultural traditions and the development of new patterns of existence. Tool kits of this period were similar to those of the Late Woodland Period, with the addition of cut brass, copper, and glass acquired through trade. Natives began to use cloth more than hides, and white beads and domestic wampum were utilized more frequently for decorative purposes. Goods, such as silver ornaments and European coins, which had significance to Europeans, were often modified to form objects of other individual or societal importance. The increased successes of European colonists would eventually cause the alteration and demise of most of the cultural characteristics of Native populations of the region. Archaeological potential was assessed prior to the survey. Prehistoric archaeological potential was assessed using three factors: previously recorded sites within or adjacent to the APE, topographic setting, and distance to water. A search of the online archaeological site files of the n W Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V -CRIS) identified three prehistoric archaeological sites and one multi - component archaeological site recorded within a 1.6- kilometer (1 -mile) radius of the APE. On -site soils are mapped as somewhat excessively drained Weikert-Berks channery silt loams (41E) with slopes of 25% to 65% at the proposed project location (Natural Resources Conservation Service 2013). Actual slopes within the APE are within approximately 2% to 8 %. The proposed project location is situated on an upland hill slope. The nearest natural body of water is Ash Hollow Run, which is approximately 43.6 meters (142.9 feet) northeast of the APE and 56 meters (183.7 feet) west - northwest of the APE. The proposed project location is situated within a favorable distance from a perennial water source. Based on this information, prehistoric archaeological potential in the APE was evaluated as high prior to the field view. Historic archaeological potential was assessed through an examination of maps and previously recorded sites. A search of the online archaeological site files of the Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V -CRIS) identified 40 historic archaeological sites and one multi- component archaeological site recorded within a 1.6- kilometer (1 -mile) radius of the APE. In addition, the APE is situated within the mapped boundaries of two National Register eligible battlefields (ID# 034- 0456, the Third Battle of Winchester Site, and ID# 034 -5023, the Second Winchester Battlefield). Maps dating to 1885 and 1938 show little historic development in the immediate area of the APE Lake 1885; USGS 1938). A modern aerial photograph shows a moderate degree of development in the area immediately surrounding the APE (Google Earth 2015). Modern aerial views do not exhibit evidence of surface disturbances at the proposed project location (Google Earth 2015). Based on this information, and due to the APE's location within the mapped boundaries of two historic battlefields, historic archaeological potential in the proposed project location was evaluated as moderate to high prior to the field investigation. 0 0 e / ! • , _, 0.5 -MILE APE Go»_ fl „ O r A u ` ",P• BL* 643 u „ Ch . N k PROPOSED MONOPOLE LOCATION r, t L i • r 7 MTE O 1 6 ' 654 '`r =< ,• q ^" - : _ - " T 461 659, • 1, y j.j I ja j •\ 1 r - -. A• - .Abrams - " rr ern Ck Tank - AREA OF POTENTIAL EFFECTS, `° SCALE SOURCE Oft 2000ft USGS 1997a m p STEPHENSON, VA -WV N Om 609.6m USGS 1997b WINCHESTER, VA -WV Prepared by CHRS, Inc. PROJECT LOCATION MAP FIGURE 1 Photograph 1: Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing north. Ita Photograph 2: Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing east. 7 0 i Photograph 3: Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing south. Photograph 4: Overview from the proposed monopole location, facing west. i i Photograph 5: Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing north. Photograph 6: Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing east. 6 0 0 Photograph 7: Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing south. Photograph 8: Overview of the proposed monopole location, facing west. 10 i Photograph 9: Overview of the proposed access easement, facing southwest. The extant parking lot and disturbances are situated down slope from this location. 11 Photograph 10: Example of a disturbance encountered in the proposed project location. This material is located down slope from the proposed lease area, near a paved parking lot. 12 Photograph 11: Representative shovel test pit profile. 13 M 0 0 i EXISTING DUMPSTER a 0 f1 AY EXISTING 15" HDPE CULVERT o i PHOTO LOCATION SHOVEL TEST SCALE SOURCE 0 Oft 70ft Om 21.3m TELEGENT ENGINEERING INC. 2015 Prepared by CHRS, Inc. ARCHAEOLOGICAL TEST LOCATIONS AND FIGURE 2PHOTOGRAPHLOCATIONS 0 0 FIELD METHODS A pedestrian reconnaissance was made of the approximately 0.08- hectare (0.2 -acre) project area in 1.52 -meter (5 -foot) transects. Surface visibility of the landscape within the APE was approximately 8 %. The visual inspection of the APE was followed by subsurface testing. Shovel test pits (STPs) measuring approximately 50 centimeters (19.68 inches) in diameter were excavated inside the proposed lease area and access easement. Shovel test pits were placed at a maximum of 15.24 -meter (50 -foot) intervals. All shovel test pits were excavated by hand, following natural stratigraphy, to a depth of no less than 10 centimeters (3.9 inches) into culturally sterile subsoil or until excavation by hand was no longer possible due to rocks or other obstructions. All soil was screened through 0.63- centimeter (0.25 -inch) hardware cloth. The proposed project location is situated on an upland hill slope. The proposed project location is not subject to alluvial flood deposits, slope wash depositions or significant loess deposits. Soils do not show evidence of significant erosion. On -site soils are mapped as somewhat excessively drained Weikert-Berks channery silt loams (41 E) with slopes of 25% to 65% at the proposed project location (Natural Resources Conservation Service 2013). Prior to fieldwork, the Frederick County, Virginia soil survey was consulted that identified the typical profile for this soil type in Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia (USDA Soil Conservation Service 1987). Soils encountered during the course of this archaeological survey varied, in part due to the slope, but were consistent with those described in the Frederick County, Virginia soil survey. The degree of slope within the project location was considerably less than the soil description, consisting of approximately 2% to 8% slopes. Fifteen shovel test pits (STPs 1 through 15) were excavated. Shovel Test Pits 1 to 3, which were situated close to the extant paved parking lot, shared a generally similar soil profile, consisting of yellowish brown (10YR 5/4) dense clay loam with gravels or a mottled and rocky brown and gray (10YR 5/3 and 10YR 511) clay loam. Rock impasses were encountered in Shovel Test Pits 1 through 3 between 8 centimeters and 17 centimeters. Shovel Test Pits 4, 6, 7, and 9 through 15 shared a generally similar soil profile, which was comprised of 15 centimeters to 34 centimeters of light olive brown (2.5Y 5/3) channery loam atop a culturally sterile and compact light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/4) channery clay loam subsoil. Shovel Test Pit 5 had a soil profile consisting of 12 centimeters of light olive brown (2.5Y 5/3) loam atop 5 centimeters of dark grayish brown (2.5Y 4/2) loam. This was underlain by 11 centimeters of light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/4) clay loam atop 12 centimeters of a very channery light olive brown (2.5Y 5/3) clay loam. A rock impasse was encountered in STP 5 at 36 centimeters below grade (Photograph 11). Shovel Test Pit 8 had a soil profile which was comprised of 17 centimeters of light olive brown 2.5Y 5/3) channery loam atop 6 centimeters of olive brown (2.5Y 4/3) channery silt loam. This was underlain by a culturally sterile, channery light yellowish brown (2.5Y 6/4) clay loam subsoil. All shovel test pits were excavated by hand, following natural stratigraphy, to a depth of no less than 10 centimeters (3.9 inches) into culturally sterile subsoil or until excavation by hand was no 15 longer possible due to rocks or other obstructions. A stratigraphic profile representative of each shovel test was recorded on a standardized shovel test form (Appendix A). No artifacts were recovered. No archaeological sites were identified and no additional archaeological work is recommended. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION This archaeological summary documents the results of an archaeological survey performed for the TRILEAF Corporation Site# 619112 (Shenandoah Hills). The proposed monopole location is situated at 143 Greenwood Road, approximately 185.9 meters (610 feet) southeast of the intersection of Greenwood Road and Berryville Pike, in a grassy area behind a church, in a moderately developed and moderately treed section of Winchester, Frederick County, Virginia. This archaeological survey was conducted to ensure that potentially significant archaeological resources are not located within the area impacted by the proposed project. This document is being submitted in compliance with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement For Review Of Effects On Historic Properties For Certain Undertakings Approved By The Federal Communications Commission" (FCC 2004). The information is being submitted as part of the required New Tower (NT) Submission Packet, Form 620. Fifteen shovel test pits were excavated. No artifacts were recovered. No archaeological sites were identified and no additional archaeological work is recommended. 16 0 REFERENCES CITED Black, F.L. 1992 "Why Did They Die ?" Science 258:1739 -1740. Cavallo, J.A. 1983 "Fish, Fires, and Foresight: Middle Woodland Economic Adaptations in the Abbott Farm National Landmark." North American Archaeologist 5:111 -138. 1987 Abbott Farm, Area B (28ME1 -B): Archaeological Data Recovery. Federal highway Administration and New Jersey Department of Transportation, Trenton. Custer, Jay F. 1984 Delaware Prehistoric Archaeology: An Ecological Approach. Newark: University of Delaware Press. 1989 Prehistoric Cultures of the Delmarva Peninsula: An Archaeological Study. Newark, Delaware: University of Delaware Press. 1990 "Early and Middle Archaic Culture of Virginia: Cultural Change and Continuity." In Early and Middle Archaic Research in Virginia: A Synthesis, edited by Theodore R. Reinhart and Mary Ellen Hodges. Special Publication No. 22 of the Archaeological Society of Virginia. Richmond, Virginia: The Dietz Press, pp. 1 -60. 1996 Prehistoric Cultures of Eastern Pennsylvania. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Bureau of Historic Preservation. Custer, Jay F. and R.M. Stewart 1990 "Environment, Analogy, and Early Paleo- Indian Economies in Northeastern North America." In Early Paleo- Indian Economies of North America, Research in Economic Anthropology, Supplement 5, edited by B. Isaac and K. Tankersley, pp. 303 -322. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press. Custer, Jay F. et al. 1983 Paleo- Indian Adaptations on the Coastal Plain of Delaware and New Jersey. Ms. On file, Department of Anthropology, University of Delaware. Dent, Richard J. 1995 Chesapeake Prehistory: Old Traditions, New Directions. New York: Plenum Press. Dent, Richard J. and Barbara E. Kauffinan 1978 Settlement - Subsistence Systems in the Blue Ridge and Great Valley Sections of Virginia: A Comparison. Paper presented at the Middle Atlantic Archaeological Conference, Rehoboth Beach, Delaware. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) 2004 "Nationwide Programmatic Agreement For Review Of Effects On Historic Properties For Certain Undertakings Approved By The Federal Communications Commission." 17 Funk, Robert 1969 "The Archaeology of Dutchess Quarry Cave, Orange County, New York." Pennsylvania Archaeologist 39, p. 1 -4. Gardner, William M. 1974 The Flint Run Paleo- Indian Complex: A Preliminary Report of the 1971 -1973 Seasons. Occasional Publications No. 1, The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 1977 "Flint Run Paleo- Indian Complex and Its Implications for Eastern North American Prehistory." Annals of the New York Academy ofSciences 288:257 -263. 1978 Comparison of Ridge and Valley, Blue Ridge, Piedmont, and Coastal Plain Archaic Period Site Distribution: An Idealized Transect (Preliminary Model). Preliminary draft on file at The Catholic University of America, Washington, D.C. 1981 "Paleoindian Settlement Patterns and Site Distribution in the Middle Atlantic." In Anthropological Careers: Perspectives on Research, Employment, and Training, edited by Ruth H. Landman et al., pp. 51 -73. Washington, D.C.; Anthropological Society of Washington. 1989 "Excavations at 18CV279." Prepared for CRJ Associates, Inc., Camp Springs, Maryland. Google Earth 2015 Google Earth. Accessed at <http: / /earth.google.com >. Accessed on December 4, 2015. Kinsey, W. Fred, Herbert C. Kraft, Patricia Marchiando, and David J. Werner 1972 Archaeology in the Upper Delaware Valley. Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission, Anthropological Series 3. Kraft, Herbert C. 1986 The Lenape: Archaeology, History, and Ethnography. Newark, New Jersey; New Jersey Historical Society. Lake, D.J. and Co. 1885 Shawnee Township, Winchester, Kernestown, Parkins Mills, Opequon, Fawcetts Gap - Right. In "Frederick County 1885." Accessed at http: // www.historicmapworks.com/Map/US/ 167912 /Shawnee+Township + +Winchest er+ +Kemestown++Parkins +Mills + +Opequon+ +Fawcetts +Gap ++ +Right /Frederick +Co unty+ 1885+ Copy +2 +Microfilm +and +Orig +Mix /Virginia/ >. Accessed on December 4, 2015. Levine, M.A. 1990 "Accommodating Age: Radiocarbon Results and Fluted Point Sites in Northeastern North America." In Archaeology in Eastern North America 18:33 -64. 18 0 9 Louis Berger and Associates, Inc. 1996 Phase I Historical and Archaeological Survey, Proposed Kimples Creek Bridge Replacement, S.R. 4101, Section 76S, Haycock Township, Bucks County, Pennsylvania. Report prepared for Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Engineering District 6 -0, St. Davids, Pennsylvania. McLearen, D. 1991 Phase III Archaeological Investigations of the "522 Bridge Site " (44WR329), Warren County, Virginia. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond. McNett, Charles W. (editor) 1985 Shawnee Minisink: A Stratified Paleoindian Archaic Site in the Upper Delaware Valley ofPennsylvania. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press, Inc. Natural Resources Conservation Service 2013 Soil survey data. Published on the Natural Resources Conservation Services. Accessed at < http: / /websoilsurvey.nres. usda .gov /appiWebSoilSurvey.aspx >. Accessed on December 4, 2015. Reinhart, Theodore R. and Mary Ellen N. Hodges (Eds.) 1992 Middle and Late Woodland Research in Virginia: A Synthesis. Richmond: The Archaeological Society of Virginia. Ritchie, William A. and Robert E. Funk 1971 "Evidence of Early Archaic Occupations on Staten Island." Pennsylvania Archaeologist 42:45 -60. Snow, D.R. 1980 The Archaeology ofNew England. New York: Academic Press. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service 1987 "Soil Survey of Frederick County, Virginia." Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. United States Geological Survey 1938 Winchester, VA -WV Quadrangle. 15- minute series. Denver, CO: United States Geological Survey. 1997a Stephenson, VA -WV Quadrangle. 7.5- minute series. Denver, CO: United States Geological Survey. 1997b Winchester, VA -WV Quadrangle. 7.5- minute series. Denver, CO: United States Geological Survey. 2003 "A Tapestry of Time and Terrain." Online map of physiographic regions found at http: / /www.nationalatlas. gov /tapestry/physiogr /physio.html >. Accessed on December 4, 2015. 19 0 9 APPENDIX A SHOVEL TEST FORMS 0 0 CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project Date / Site 11 Areaff Property Name: Recorder Shovel Test Number Transect: Coordinates Profile Stratigraphy 77 A: 1 to 71 B: to 7' C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H to Soils 1,4 Artifacts Disturbances klk; 1/7"' Not es: A; f Y, ILell f r. r 0 CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project Date'_ Site / Area J Property Name: Recorder: Shovel Test Number Transect : Coordinates Profile t I f- -1 i I Artifacts : Disturbances Stratigraphy A: F to Wit' to ' C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H : to Notes: f AV—/ CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Pro ect: if Date Site 1 Area t Property Name Recorder: Shovel Test Number x Transect: Coordinates Profile Artifacts : V Disturbances Notes: Stratigraphy 7 A: to B: to LiL,- C: to D: to E-, to F: to G: to H to Soils f f 0 J CURS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Date: Project Site / Area Property Name: Recorder: Transect: Shovel Test Number Coordinates Profile Artifacts Disturbances : Notes: Stratigraphy A: to B: to C: to D: to E-. to F: to G: to H : to Soils 67 41 1!Ze f I 4 0 CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project - _ — Date Site i Area / Property Name : Recorder: Shovel Test Number Transect : Coordinates : Profile Artifacts : " Disturbances : NW.N:I Stratigraphy Soils rA: to i B: to to 7 D. t© a E: to F: to G: to H : to 1 r - - CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project Site /Area / Property Name: Date Recorder Shovel Test Number Transect: Coordinates : Profile it Artifacts : Stratigraphy A: to B: to cx C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H to Soils Project Date ILI Site / Area /Property Name: Recorder Shovel Test Number Transect: Coordinates Profile Artifacts Disturbances : Stratigraphy A: to B: to C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H to Soils JS CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project IrDate Site /Area /Property Name: Recorder Shovel Test Number Transect: Coordinates Profile Artifacts : Disturbances : Stratigraphy A: to B: to C: to D: to E: to F: to G. to H to Soils 7 i CURS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project Site ! Area l Property Name: Shovel Test Number Coordinates Profile Artifacts : Stratigraphy A: / to m B , to C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H : to Soils Date: } Recorder Transect: r r P e`l''T7 Date 0r r' . 8 e//reu/ Name: runm o Shovel Test yNumber ' . Coordinates Profile Soils Disturbances : B: to C:tv______ J:to______ E:tm______ F:to______ G:to______ H to Soils Disturbances : 0 • CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project Date : Site / Area 11 Property Name Recorder: Shovel Test Number Transect: Coordinates Profile Artifacts : Disturbances Stratigraphy A to B: to C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H to Soils CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form WProject : Date. s mom"" isJ Site I Area ! Property Name : Recorder Li e Shovel Test Number / Transect : Coordinates Profile Disturbances Stratigraphy A: to B: to C: to D: to E: to F: to G: to H : to Not i CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form i Project ' - Date fi i Site / Area ! Property Name : Recorder Shovel Test Number i` ' Transect Coordinates Profile t i j f a Artifacts : Disturbances Notes: Stratigraphy A: to y B: to g C: to D: to _ E: to F: to G: to H : to Soils CHRS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form Project z Date: Site / Area / Property Name Recorder: Shovel Test Number I Transect: Coordinates Profile F-- 7 Artifacts : Disturbances : Stratigraphy A: to Soils F: to G: to H to 0 CURS, Inc. Survey Shovel Test Form s Project Date Site /Area t Property blame ; Recorder* Shovel Test Ntunber Transect : Coordinates Profile Stratigraphy, Soils 3 A: to B C: to D: to 1: to 1 =: to G. to H to i I Artifacts : Disturbances : Notes :; NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 6. Tribal and NHO Involvement At an early stage in the planning process, the Nationwide Agreement requires the Applicant to gather information from appropriate Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations ( "NHOs ") to assist in the identification of Historic Properties of religious and cultural significance to them. Describe measures taken to identify Indian tribes and NHOs that may attach religious and cultural significance to Historic Properties that may be affected by the construction within the Areas of Potential Effects ( "APE ") for direct and visual effects. If such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, list them and provide a summary of contacts by either the FCC, the Applicant, or the Applicant's representative. Provide copies of relevant documents, including correspondence. If no such Indian tribes or NHOs were identified, please explain. Trileaf Corporation completed the Tower Construction Notification System (TCNS) on December 8, 2015, and received the notification of interested tribes on December 11, 2015. The attached FCC Notification email lists the Tribes identified through the TCNS process. A second notice will be sent to all interested tribes /organizations, after a period of 30 days and the consultation process will continue per the FCC's guidelines. Any relevant comments from Tribes received by Trileaf will be forwarded to your office. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 9 From: towemotifyinfo(a)fcc.gov To: Inm Cc: )onathan.lonas(o fcc.go ; diane.dunertcafcc.gov Subject: NOTICE OF ORGANIZATION(S) WHICH WERE SENT PROPOSED TOWER CONSTRUCTION NOTIFICATION INFORMATION - Email ID #4429870 Date: Friday, December 11, 2015 2:07:46 AM Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for using the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) Tower Construction Notification System TCNS). The purpose of this electronic mail message is to inform you that the following authorized persons were sent the information you provided through TONS, which relates to your proposed antenna structure. The information was forwarded by the FCC to authorized TCNS users by electronic mail and/or regular mail (letter). Persons who have received the information that you provided include leaders or their designees of federally - recognized American Indian Tribes, including Alaska Native Villages (collectively "Tribal Nations "), Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOs), and State Historic Preservation Officers (SHPOs). For your convenience in identifying the referenced Tribal Nations and NHOs and in making further contacts, the City and State of the Seat of Government for each Tribal Nation and NHO, as well as the designated contact person, is included in the listing below. We note that Tribal Nations may have Section 106 cultural interests in ancestral homelands or other locations that are far removed from their current Seat of Government. Pursuant to the Commission's rules as set forth in the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the Federal Communications Commission (NPA), all Tribal Nations and NHOs listed below must be afforded a reasonable opportunity to respond to this notification, consistent with the procedures set forth below, unless the proposed construction falls within an exclusion designated by the Tribal Nation or NHO. NPA, Section IV.F.4). The information you provided was forwarded to the following Tribal Nations and NHOs. If a Tribal Nation or NHO does not respond within a reasonable time, you should make a reasonable effort at follow -up contact, unless the Tribal Nation or NHO has agreed to different procedures (NPA, Section IV.F.5). In the event a Tribal Nation. or NHO does not respond to a follow -up inquiry, or if a substantive or procedural disagreement arises between you and a Tribal Nation or NHO, you must seek guidance from the Commission (NPA, Section IV.G). These procedures are further set forth in the FCC's Declaratory Ruling released on October 6, 2005 (FCC 05 -176). 1. Cultural Preservation Director Nekole Alligood - Delaware Nation - 31064 State Highway 281 (PO Box: 825) Anadarko, OK - nalligood @delawarenation.com - 405- 247 -2448 Details: The Delaware Nation located in Anadarko, Oklahoma charges a $500 administrative fee for the review of ALL projects. Change Effective 5/21/2013). Send fee payable to the Delaware Nation in the form of a check or money order. All projects for review by the Delaware Nation must pay the $500 fee. Please note that the Delaware Nation and the Delaware Tribe of Indians ARE NOT the same enitity. Send all correspondence for the Delaware Nation to The Delaware Nation ATTN: Cultural Preservation Department 31064 State Hwy 281 Anadarko, OK 73005. 9 2. Chief Leo R Henry - Tuscarora Nation - 2006 Mt. Hope Road Via: Lewiston, NY - - 716 - 298 -5114 Details: If the Applicant/tower builder receives no response from the Tuscarora Nation within 30 days after notification through TCNS, the Tuscarora Nation has no interest in participating in pre - construction review for the site. The Applicant/tower builder, however, must IMMEDIATLY notify the Tuscarora Nation in the event archaeological properties or human remains are discovered during construction. 3. THPO Sheila M Bird - Cherokee Nation - (PO Box: 948) Tahlequah, OK - sheila- bird @cherokee.org - 918- 453 -5389 Details: The Cherokee Nation Historic Preservation Office has developed the following consultation procedures for all telecommunication projects identified as undertakings by the Federal Communications Commission. Please submit by US postal mail or other carrier: 1. A 1 -page cover letter with the following information: a. TCNS Number include on all correspondence b. Company Name c. Project Name, City, County, State d. Project type: new build, collocation, expansion, tower type - monopole, guyed- tower, height, land use, access road - existing or new build, utility lines -route with access road or new route, explanation of ground disturbance. e. Tower coordinates: GIS Shape files projected in NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N coordinate system. Lats andLongs need to be in decimal degrees. f. Total area surveyed in acres g. Contact information include individuals name, address, phone and email 2. Professional culturallarchaeological survey report. With the first cultural resource survey report, include curriculum vitae for all archaeologists who conduct the field surveys and produce the cultural survey reports. At a minimum, the field surveyors must possess a BA or BS in anthropology with an emphasis in archaeology. Field surveyors who only possess a BA or BS in anthropology must be accompanied in the field by a supervisor who possesses an MA or MS in anthropology with an emphasis in archaeology. At a minimum, the individualwho supervises and interprets the results of the field survey, determines the cultural resource recommendation, and produces the cultural survey report must possess an MA or MS in anthropology with an emphasis in archaeology. Aerial and/or color USGS topographic maps locating project area within a) state, b) county, and c) within local area. 4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, orplanimetric maps specifically locating: a) cell tower site, b) .5, .75 or 1.5 mile APE c) surveyed area for access road d) surveyed area for utility easement e) for guyed towers, surveyed locations for guy anchors f) surveyed staging area g) location of archaeological and historic sites in the APE and in the close vicinity of the APE. Do not submit hand drawn or handannotated maps. 5. Project site plan maps depicting labeled shoveltest locations. Do not submit hand drawn or hand annotated maps. At a minimum, shovel tests need to be at the center and four corners of the cell tower lease area, all guy anchorlocations, throughout the access road and utility easement, and staging area. The minimum shovel test density for access roads and utility easements is 1 every 20 m. Shovel test minimum width is 40 cm. Shovel test minimum depth is to 50 cm or sterile soil, whichever is encountered first. If terminated before sterile soil is reached, please provide an explanation either in the text or in the shovel test table. Excavated shovel tests must be screened using a 0.25 in mesh screen, dug in stratigraphic or10 cm levels, and measurements must be recorded in centimeters. 6. Table listing shovel test locations, width (cm), depths (cm), soils, and results. 7. Site photographs in color, specifically images with exact location of a) cell tower construction site by taking shot with cell tower/base /compound location markedby stakes or flagging, b) guy anchor locations, c) access road, d) utility easement, and e) staging area. 8. Submit a $500.00 per -tower fee for administration, data processing, handling, research, and review. Expedited tower fee is $700.00. Make the check payable to the Cherokee Nation. On the memo line write all TCNS numbers. Exceptions for information submission: A. Collocations that do not involve any ground disturbance. Please submit the applicable information from item numbers 1, 3, 7, and 9 above. B. Collocations or new towers that do involve ground disturbance and are in a location that previouslyexperienced significant ground disturbance. Please submit the applicable information from item numbers 1, 3, 4, and 7 -9 above. In addition, please provide documentation that confirms the significant ground disturbance claim, i.e. photographs, past land use, and/or inspection by a qualified archaeologist. Mail one printed color copy of all documentation accompanied with a CD version. Please, do NOT send FCC Form 620 (FCC submittal form and attachments packet), or any sections of the FCC form in place of the cultural resource survey report or any state Section 106 survey memo /short reporting form. Use only the following contact and address information: Sheila Bird, THPO Cherokee Nation Historic Preservation Office P.O. Box 948 Tahlequah, OK 74464 0 sheila- bird @cherokee.org Phone: 918453 -5389 4. TCNS Coordinator Travis Patton - Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma - 70500 East 128 Road Wyandotte, OK - tpatton @estoo.net - 918 - 666 -2435 (ext: 1860) Details: NOTE: CHANGE IN FEE - EVERY TCNS ABOVE 131828 The Cultural Preservation Office of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma requires the following information and fees regarding all proposed FCC projects. Please do not email documentation; it will bedeleted without being opened. Mail one printed color copy of all documentation. Please submit by US postal mail or other parcel carrier all of the following information for all FCC projects: A 1 -page cover letter with the following information: a) TCNS number b) Company name c) Project name, city, county, state d) Project type e) UTM coordinates using WGS84 (G1150) f) Total area surveyed in acres g) Contact information. 2. Professional cultural /archaeological resource survey report. 3. Aerial and color USGS topographic maps locating project area within the state, county, and local area. 4. Aerial, color USGS topographic, or planimetric maps locating tower site, APE, access road, utility easement,guy wire locations surveyed, surveyed staging areas, and known archaeological/historic sites. 5. Project site plan map depicting labeled shovel test locations. 6. Shovel test log. 7. Site photographs. 8. A copy of the review letter or TCNS e- response from the State Historic Preservation Office and all other state - mandated review offices for projects involving ground disturbance. 9. Please submit a fee of $550.00 per /tower, for administration, data processing, handling, research and review. Make the check payable to the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma. On the memo line write all TCNS numbers. Collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations; the administration, data processing, handling, research and review feewill be $100.00. Effective October 1, 2015,regarding collocations, PTC poles, and projects in previously disturbed locations, the administration, data processing, handling, research and review will increase to $550.00 for EVERY TCNS ABOVE 131828. IO.THE EASTERN SHAWNEE TRIBE'S CONSULTATION PROCEDURES DOCUMENT is available by email and is highly recommended for guidance. Send an email to Travis Patton at: celltower@estoo.net. 5. THPO Kim Jumper - Shawnee Tribe - 29 South 69A Highway Miami, OK - kimjumper @shawnee- tribe.com 918 -542 -2441 Details: THIS IS YOUR OFFICIAL NOTICE THAT THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS INTERESTED IN CONSULTING ON ALL PROJECTS BUILT IN OUR AREAS OF GEOGRAPHIC INTEREST. ATTENTION, NEW INFORMATION: Our procedures were updated on 14 January 2008. Please call Kim Jumper, THPO, at 918 -542 -2441, so that she can send you a copy. If your tower is a co- location, please fax us this information to let us know. We cannot always tell from the TCNS web site that a tower is a co- location. We require a written response from you to let us know that it is a co- location. If a co- location project includes some new ground disturbance (such as from an expanded compound or access road, or construction of an ancillary structure), the Shawnee Tribe treats such a project the same as any other non co- location project. Our convect mailing/physical address is: 29 South Highway 69A. Our correct phone number is (918 -542 -2441) and our historic preservation fax line is (918 -542- 9915). THPO Kim Jumper manages all cell tower consultation. As of 26 June2006, all of the faxed responses of our final comments on a tower site will contain an original Shawnee Tribe signature. Each final comment fax is signed individually. Copies may be compared, for authentication, against the original in our files.If afmal comment fax does not contain a signature, it is not valid. ALL FINAL COMMENTS FROM THE SHAWNEE TRIBE ARE WRITTEN; FINAL COMMENTS ARE NEVER PROVIDED VERBALLY. IF THE SHAWNEE TRIBE IS CREDITED WITH HAVING GIVEN A VERBAL RESPONSE, THAT RESPONSE IS NOT VALID. If you receive notification through the TCNS listing the Shawnee Tribe, that is an indication that the Shawnee Tribe is interested in consulting on the tower for which that notification was received. Please consider that our official indication of interest to you. The Shawnee Tribe considers the Tower Construction Notification System's weekly e- mail to be the first notification that we receive that a tower will be constructed in an area of our concern. We do not view the TCNS notificationas completion of 106 consultation obligations. The Shawnee Tribe has developed streamlined consultation procedures for cell tower developers and their subcontractors. If you do not have a copy of the procedures - most recently updated on 14 January2008 - please contact us, as you must follow these procedures to consult with us on cell tower projects. Call us at 918 -542 -2441 or fax us at 918 -542 -9915. It is the tower builder's responsibility to make sure that you have our most recent consultation procedures. PLEASE DO NOT SEND US INFORMATION, QUERIES, OR COMMENTS ELECTRONICALLY. SINCE 1 DECEMBER 2005, WE HAVE NOT HANDLED ANY CELL TOWER CONSULTATION, INQUIRIES, OR CORRESPONDENCE VIA E -MAIL. 0 6. THPO and Executive Director Dr. Wenonah G Haire - Catawba Indian Nation - 1536 Tom Steven Road CIN -THPO Rock Hill, SC - wenonahh @ccpperafts.com - 803 - 328 -2427 Details: The Catawba Indian Nation Tribal Historic Preservation Office requests that you send us by regular mail the following information needed to complete our research for your proposed project (including ALL Positive Train Control (PTC) projects): Project Name Project Number 1. The name, complete address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address of the project manager. 2. The project location plotted on a topo map. 3. The project name, address and location; street or highway, city, county, state. 4. A brief description of the proposed project. Please include the size of the proposed project site and the size of the area where ground- disturbing activities will be taking place and the type of disturbance anticipated. 5. A brief description of current and former land use. We are primarily interested in ground disturbance and do not need detailed information orphotographs of historic structures in the projectarea. 6. A list of all recorded archaeological sites within one half (1/2) mile of the project area. 7. A list of all eligible and potentially eligible National Register of Historic Places sites within one half (1/2) mile of the proposed project area. 8. If there has been an archaeological survey done in the area, a copy of that report. 9. It is not necessary to send original color photos if you can provide high - resolutioncolor copies. 10. A letter of concurrence from the appropriate State Historic Preservation Office. If you use the FCC Form 620, please do not send Attachments 1 through 6. They are not necessary for our determination. We do not have an interest in projects that require no ground disturbance. Please note: Our research/processing fee is $400. Please send these requested materials in hard copy format. Send to: CIN -THPO 1536 Tom Steven Road Rock Hill, S.C. 29730 0 0 The information you provided was also forwarded to the following SHPOs in the State in which you propose to construct and neighboring States. The information was provided to these SHPOs as a courtesy for their information and planning. You need make no effort at this time to follow up with any SHPO that does not respond to this notification. Prior to construction, you must provide the SHPO of the State in which you propose to construct (or the Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, if the project will be located on certain Tribal lands), with a Submission Packet pursuant to Section VILA of the NPA. 7. Environmental Review Coordinator Renee GledhillEarley - NC State Historic Preservation Office - 4617 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC - renee .gledhill- earley @ncmail.net - 919 - 7334763 8. Deputy SHPO David Brook - Historic Preservation Office - 4610 Mail Service Center Raleigh, NC - david.brook@ncmail.net - 919 - 807 -7283 9. Manager - Office of Review & Compliance Ethel R Eaton PhD - Department of Historic Resources - 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA - ethel.eaton@dhr.virginia.gov - 804 - 367 -2323 10. Deputy SHPO Susan M Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office 1900 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston, WV - susan.pierce @wvculture.org - 304 -558 -0240 11. Deputy SHPO Susan Pierce - West Virginia Division of Culture & History, Historic Preservation Office - 1901 Kanawha Boulevard East Charleston, WV - susan.pierce@wvculture.org - -- 12. Director Julie Langan - Virginia Department of Historic Resources - 2801 Kensington Avenue Richmond, VA - VASHPO_FCC @dhr.virginia.gov - 804 - 367 -2323 Exclusions" above set forth language provided by the Tribal Nation or SHPO. These exclusions may indicate types of PTC wayside pole notifications that the Tribal Nation or SHPO does not wish to review. TCNS automatically forwards all notifications to all Tribal Nations and SHPOs that have an expressed interest in the geographic area of a proposal. However, if a proposal falls within a designated exclusion, you need not expect any response and need not pursue any additional process with that Tribal Nation or SHPO. Exclusions may also set forth policies or procedures of a particular Tribal Nation or SHPO (for example, types of information that a Tribal Nation routinely requests, or a policy that no response within 30 days indicates no interest in participating in pre - construction review). Please be advised that the FCC cannot guarantee that the contact(s) listed above opened and reviewed an electronic or regular mail notification. If you learn any of the above contact information is no longer valid, please contact the FCC. The following information relating to the proposed tower was forwarded to the person(s) listed above: 0 Notification Received: 12/08/2015 Notification ID: 134208 Tower Owner Individual or Entity Name: Verizon Wireless Consultant Name: Mindi L Okai Street Address: 10845 Olive Blvd. Suite 260 City: St. Louis State: MISSOURI Zip Code: 63141 Phone: 314-997-6111 Email: tribal @trileaf.com Structure Type: MTOWER - Monopole Latitude: 39 deg 11 min 12.6 sec N Longitude: 78 deg 6 min 39.6 sec W Location Description: 143 Greenwood Road City: Winchester State: VIRGINIA County: FREDERICK Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: No Township Found. Ground Elevation: 197.8 meters Support Structure: 45.7 meters above ground level Overall Structure: 47.2 meters above ground level Overall Height AMSL: 245.0 meters above mean sea level If you have any questions or comments regarding this notice, please contact the FCC using the electronic mail form located on the FCC's website at: You may also call the FCC Support Center at (877) 480 -3201 (TTY 717 - 338 - 2824). Hours are from 8 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through Friday (except Federal holidays). To provide quality service and ensure security, all telephone calls are recorded. Thank you, Federal Communications Commission NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 7. Historic Properties Direct Effects a. List all properties within the APE for direct effects. A map and survey form search was conducted by Ms. Rachael Fowler, RPA, Archaeologist, of CHRS, Inc., using the online files of the Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V- CRIS), on December 4, 2015. Based on this information, Ms. Maureen McDougall, Architectural Historian, of CHRS, Inc., identified the following historic properties in the APE for direct effects. a. The Subject Property and proposed project are located within the mapped boundaries of the Third Battle of Winchester Site (ID# 034 - 0456), which was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places on February 2, 1990. b. The Subject Property and proposed project are located within the mapped boundaries of the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034 - 5023), which was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places on November 24, 1998. The portions of the Third Battle of Winchester Site (ID# 034 -0456) and the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034 -5023) that are located within the proposed project's APE have been largely developed since the resources were determined eligible. A residential development to the south and southeast of the project location was constructed in the late 1990s through early 2000s; another residential development to the northeast of the proposed project was constructed in the past ten years. Immediately north of the proposed project is a large property with two school buildings, one of which (and all of its associated fields and parking lots) was constructed post -1997, based on aerial images. This portion of the resource no longer retains integrity of setting, feeling, and association. Given the vast extent of development in this portion of the resource, the proposed project will not constitute a significant new visual intrusion to the Third Battle of Winchester Site (ID# 034 - 0456), nor to the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield (ID# 034 - 5023). No cultural materials or features were observed on the surface of the direct APE, and no archaeological artifacts were encountered during the field survey. A finding of No Adverse Effect to Historic Properties in the APE for Direct Effects is recommended for this project. b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for direct effects, not listed in part "a" (above), that the Applicant considers to be eligible for listing in the National Register as a result of the Applicant's research. For each such Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET— FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). For each property that was specifically considered and determined not to be eligible, describe why it does not satisfy the criteria of eligibility. N/A Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 9 NT SUBMISSION PACKET— FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 7. Continued c. Describe the techniques and the methodology, including any field survey, used to identify Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects.' If no archeological field survey was performed, provide a report substantiating that: i) the depth of previous disturbance exceeds the proposed construction depth (excluding footings and other anchoring mechanisms) by at least 2 feet; or, ii) geomorphological evidence indicates that cultural resource- bearing soils do not occur within the project area or may occur but at depths that exceed 2 feet below the proposed construction depth.' The archaeological investigations were conducted on December 11, 2015 by Ms. Tori Bedingfield, MA, Archaeology Field Technician of CHRS, Inc. The work was limited to shovel test pits and visual inspection. Five shovel test pits were excavated in the lease area. Ten shovel test pits were excavated in the proposed access easement. Shovel test pits were placed at a maximum of 50 -foot intervals. All shovel tests were at least 1.5 feet in diameter and were excavated to sterile subsoil. Soil from each shovel test was screened through % -inch hardware cloth, and representative soil profiles were recorded on standardized forms using Munsell color designators ( Munsell Color 1994) and U. S. Department of Agriculture soil texture terminology. Archaeologists recorded a stratigraphic profile representative of each shovel test on a standardized shovel test form. Based on the information gathered, no previously- identified archaeological sites are located within the tower lease area or access road. No artifacts were recovered, nor were any new archaeological resources identified within the APE for direct effects. Please refer to the Archaeological Survey in attachment 5. Pursuant to Section VI.D.2.a. of the Nationwide Agreement, Applicants shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to identify above ground and archeological Historic Properties, including buildings, structures, and historic districts, that lie within the APE for direct effects. Such reasonable and good faith efforts may include a field survey where appropriate. Under Section VI.D.2.d. of the Nationwide Agreement, an archeological field survey is required even if none of these conditions applies, if an Indian tribe or NHO provides evidence that supports a high probability of the presence of intact archeological Historic Properties within the APE for direct effects. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 0 0 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 8. Historic Properties Visual Effects Historic Properties Identified for Visual Effects Guidelines a. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each property in the APE for visual effects that is listed in the National Register, has been formally determined eligible for listing by the Keeper of the National Register, or is identified as considered eligible for listing in the records of the SHPO /THPO, pursuant to Section VI.D.I.a. of the Nationwide Agreement. Please refer to the table below, which lists historic properties identified during a review of files conducted using the online files of the Virginia Cultural Resource Information System (V- CRIS), Ms. Rachael Fowler, RPA, Archaeologist of CHRS, Inc., on December 4, 2015. Virginia Inventory Number /NRHP Inventory Number Historic Property Name and Address Resource Status Effect Determination Explanation of Effect Determination 034 -0456 Third Battle of Eligible No Adverse Effect The resource, the Third Battle of Winchester Winchester Site Site, was determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places on February 2, 1990. The Subject Property is situated within the mapped boundaries of the resource. The Subject Property and proposed project will be visible from some areas within the resource. The portion of the resource that is located within the proposed project's APE has been largely developed since the resource was determined eligible. A residential development to the south and southeast of the project location was constructed in the late 1990s through early 2000s; another residential development to the northeast of the proposed project was constructed in the past ten years. Immediately north of the proposed project is a large property with two school buildings, one of which (and all of its associated fields and Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 parking lots) was constructed post -1997, based on aerial images. This portion of the resource no longer retains integrity of setting, feeling, and association. Given the vast extent of development in this portion of the resource, the proposed project will not constitute a significant new visual intrusion to the resource's cluttered viewshed. The proposed project will not alter those characteristics for which the resource has been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and will have No Adverse Effect on the Third Battle of Winchester Site. 034 -5023 Apple Pie Ridge /West Eligible No Adverse Effect The resource, the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Fort Parcel /Second Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield, was Winchester determined eligible for the National Register of Battlefield Historic Places on November 24, 1998. The Subject Property is located within the mapped boundaries of the resource. The Subject Property and proposed project will be visible from some areas within the resource. The portion of the resource that is located within the proposed project's APE has been largely developed since the resource was determined eligible. A residential development to the south and southeast of the project location was constructed in the late 1990s through early 2000s; another residential development to the northeast of the proposed project was constructed in the past ten years. Immediately north of the proposed project is a large property with two school buildings, one of which (and all of its associated fields and parking lots) was constructed post -1997, based on aerial images. This portion of the resource no longer retains integrity of setting, feeling, and association. Given the vast extent of development in this portion of the resource, the proposed project will not constitute a Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 s NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each Historic Property in the APE for visual effects, not listed in part "a ", identified through the comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual or group whose comments led to the inclusion of a Historic Property in this attachment. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). As of the date of this report, Trileaf Corporation has not received comments from Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public that identify Historic Properties in the APE for visual effects. c. For any properties listed in the above Historic Properties list, that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion in the National Register, explain the basis for this recommendation. N/A Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 significant new visual intrusion to the resource's cluttered viewshed. The proposed project will not alter those characteristics for which the resource has been determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, and will have No Adverse Effect on the Apple Pie Ridge /West Fort Parcel /Second Winchester Battlefield. b. Provide the name and address (including U.S. Postal Service ZIP Code) of each Historic Property in the APE for visual effects, not listed in part "a ", identified through the comments of Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public. Identify each individual or group whose comments led to the inclusion of a Historic Property in this attachment. For each such property, describe how it satisfies the criteria of eligibility (36 C.F.R. Part 63). As of the date of this report, Trileaf Corporation has not received comments from Indian Tribes, NHOs, local governments, or members of the public that identify Historic Properties in the APE for visual effects. c. For any properties listed in the above Historic Properties list, that the Applicant considers no longer eligible for inclusion in the National Register, explain the basis for this recommendation. N/A Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 9. Local Government a. If any local government has been contacted and invited to become a consulting party pursuant to Section V.A. of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement, list the local government agencies contacted. Provide a summary of contacts and copies of any relevant documents (e.g., correspondence or notices). On December 4, 2015, the Planning Department of Frederick County was notified of the proposed project and has been invited to comment on the proposed project's potential effect on Historic Properties as well as indicate whether they are interested in consulting further on the proposed project. A copy of Trileaf Corporation's correspondence with the Planning Department of Frederick County is attached. b. If a local government agency will be contacted but has not been to date, explain why and when such contact will take place. N/A Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 40 TRILEAF ENVIRONMENTAL & PROPERTY CONSULTANTS 8600 LaSalle Road, Suite 301, Towson, Maryland 21286 - 410.853.7128 - www.trileafcom December 4, 2015 Planning Department of Fredrick County Attn: Mr. Eric Lawrence, Director 107 North Kent St., Suite202 Winchester, VA 22601 540- 665 -5651 RE: Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless ( Verizon Wireless) — Shenandoah Hills / EnSite #27390 — Trileaf Project #619112 143 Greenwood Road, Winchester, Frederick County, VA 22602 Stephenson, VA -WV Quadrangle (DeLorme) Latitude: 39° 1 P 12.58" N, Longitude: 78° 06' 39.644" W Dear Mr. Lawrence: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 155 -foot tall monopole communications tower and associated equipment within a 50- foot by 50 -foot (2,500 square feet) lease area. The project includes an approximately 12 -foot wide proposed access /utility easement that extends south, and then west connecting with Greenwood Road. Currently the site consists of an undeveloped grass- covered field east of a church building. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning /zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853 -7128 or email s.levy@trileaf.com if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, ICJ Sara H. Levy Project Scientist II NT SUBMISSION PACKET — FCC FORM 620 Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Attachment 10. Other Consulting Parties and Public Notice List additional consulting parties that were invited to participate by the Applicant, or independently requested to participate. Provide any relevant correspondence or other documents. On December 4, 2015, the Winchester- Frederick County Historical Society was invited to comment on the proposed project's potential effect on Historic Properties as well as indicate whether they are interested in consulting further on the proposed project. A copy of Trileaf Corporation's correspondence with the Winchester- Frederick County Historical Society is attached. You are required to provide a Public Notice Attachment. Attached, please find a copy of a legal notice regarding the proposed telecommunications tower construction that was posted in The Northern Virginia Daily on December 11, 2015. As of the date of this submission packet, no comments regarding this notice have been received by Trileaf Corporation. Should a response be received, copies will be forwarded to all consulting parties as an addendum to this submission packet. Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 L I/ TRI LEAF ENVIRONMENTAL br PROPERTY CONSULTANTS 8600 LaSalle Road, Suite 301. Towson, MD 21286.410- 853 -7128 www.trileafcom December 4, 2015 Winchester - Fredrick County Historical Society 1340 S. Pleasant Valley Rd. Winchester, VA 22601 540- 662 -6550 RE: Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless ( Verizon Wireless) — Shenandoah Hills / EnSite #27390 — Trileaf Project #619112 143 Greenwood Road, Winchester, Frederick County, VA 22602 Stephenson, VA -WV Quadrangle (DeLorme) Latitude: 390 11' 12.58" N, Longitude: 78° 06' 39.644" W To Whom It May Concern: Trileaf Corporation is in the process of completing a NEPA Review at the referenced property. Our client proposes to construct a 155 -foot tall monopole communications tower and associated equipment within a 50- foot by 50 -foot (2,500 square feet) lease area. The project includes an approximately 12 -foot wide proposed access /utility easement that extends south, and then west connecting with Greenwood Road. Currently the site consists of an undeveloped grass - covered field east of a church building. The antenna will be licensed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). Our investigation includes determining if the site is contained in, on or within the viewshed of a building, site, district, structure or object, significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or culture, that is listed, or eligible for listing on the State or National Registers of Historic Places, or located in or on an Indian Religious Site. Trileaf is requesting information regarding this tower's potential effect on Historic Properties. All information received will be forwarded to the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) as part of the Section 106 review process. Additionally, this invitation to comment is separate from any local planning /zoning process that may apply to this project. If you wish to comment or be considered a consulting party, please respond within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter. If a response is not received within thirty (30) days, it will be assumed that you have no objections to this undertaking. A site topography map and aerial photograph are enclosed for your reference. Please call me at (410) 853 -7128 or email s.levy@trileafcom if you need additional information or have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Sincerely, Sara H. Levy Project Scientist II Cellco Partnership and its controlled affiliates doing business as Verizon Wireless (Verizon Wireless) are pro- posing to build a 155 foot Monopole Communications Tower at the ap- prox. vicinity of 143 Greenwood Road, Winchester, Frederick County, VA 22602. Public comments regard- ing potential effects from this site on historic properties may be submitted within 30 days from the date of this publication to: Trileaf Corp, Sara,S.Levy@trileaf.com, 8600 LaSalle Road, Suite 301, Towson, MD 21286, 410 - 853 -7128 259566 NT SUBMISSION PACKET— FCC FORM 620 Attachment 11. SHPO Specific Forms None required. Approved by OMB 3060 -1039 See instructions for Public burden estimates Applicant's Name: Verizon Wireless Project Name: Shenandoah Hills Project Number: 619112 FCC Form 620 0 • Sara Levy From: towernotifyinfo @fcc.gov Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 2:45 PM To: Sara Levy Subject: Section 106 Notification of SHPO /THPO Concurrence- Email ID #1586321 This is to notify you that the Lead SHPO /THPO has concurred with the following filing: Date of Action: 01/20/2016 Direct Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Visual Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Comment Text: We believe that the undertaking will have No Adverse Effect on historic properties listed in or eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, specifically the Third Battle of Winchester Site (034 -0456) and the Apple Pie Ridge /Second Winchester Battlefield (034 - 5023). Chris Novelli Virginia Department of Historic Resources File Number: 0007071293 TCNS Number: 134208 Purpose: New Tower Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 12/23/2015 Applicant: Verizon Wireless Consultant: CHRS, Inc., on behalf of Trileaf Corporation Positive Train Control Filing Subject to Expedited Treatment Under Program Comment: No Site Name: Shenandoah Hills Site Address: 143 Greenwood Road Detailed Description of Project: Legal Description: No Township Found. Site Coordinates: 39 -11 -12.6 N, 78 -6 -39.6 W City: Winchester County: FREDERICK State: VA Lead SHPO /THPO: Virginia Department of Historic Resources NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to any misuse of the system.