Loading...
TC 11-28-16 Meeting AgendaCOUNTY of FREDERICK Department of Planning and Development 540/ 665-5651 Fax: 540/ 665-6395 107 North Kent Street, Suite 202  Winchester, Virginia 22601-5000 MEMORANDUM TO: Frederick County Transportation Committee FROM: John A. Bishop, AICP, Assistant Director - Transportation RE: November 28, 2016 Transportation Committee Meeting DATE: November 18, 2016 The Frederick County Transportation Committee will be meeting at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, November 28, 2016 in the first floor conference room of the Frederick County Administration Building, 107 North Kent Street, Winchester, Virginia. AGENDA 1. Comprehensive Plan Update 2. Welltown Road/Rest Church Road traffic concerns update 3. Warren County Truck Restriction Request 4. County Projects updates 5. Other Please contact our department if you are unable to attend this meeting. Attachments JAB/dw MEMORANDUM Item 1: Comprehensive Plan update Staff has received VDOT’s comments on the transportation component of the transportation section of the County Comprehensive Plan. Attached please find the comments as well as the updated transportation chapter of the County Comprehensive Plan. All comments have been addressed and did not require any change to the County’s stated desires or plans. However, the format is now more in keeping with the new legislative requirements. Administrative Guidelines July 2016 16 Comprehensive Plan or Plan Amendment Package Checklist* For a comprehensive plan or a transportation plan, the locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of the following: □ A COVER SHEET, containing: □ CONTACT INFORMATION for the locality, and □ A SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES made to the comprehensive plan or transportation plan; □ THE PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OR TRANSPORTATION PLAN and the following Elements: □ INVENTORY – An inventory (written or graphic) of the existing transportation network, which shall include at a minimum all roadways within the Federal Aid system - any roadway classified as a Major or Urban Collector or higher functional classification or is included within the National Highway System (for more information on these terms see VDOT’s web site). VDOT District staff can provide assistance regarding which roadways must be included in the inventory. □ ASSUMPTIONS – Planning assumptions directly influence the demand placed on the transportation system. Examples of planning assumptions that may be addressed include population growth, employment growth, and location of critical infrastructure such as water and sewer facilities. □ NEEDS ASSESSMENT – Written or graphic evaluation of the transportation systems current and projected performance and conditions. This evaluation should compare the existing transportation system with the future land use policies and maps in order to determine how future growth will affect the transportation system. The needs assessment will identify specific deficiencies based on current conditions, as well as future improvements that will be needed to serve the anticipated development based on the future land use policies and maps. □ RECOMMENDATIONS – Proposed improvements or additions to transportation infrastructure. Recommendations should be specific so that the need, location and nature of the proposed improvements are clear and understandable. The recommendations should address some or all of the needs identified in the needs assessment step, above. The recommendations must be consistent with VTrans; significant new, expanded, or relocated highway projects in the SYIP; and the selected location of state highways set by the CTB. Localities are encouraged to include pedestrian, bicycle, transit, rail and other multi-modal recommendations as they deem appropriate. □ MAP - The transportation plan shall include a map showing road and transportation improvements, taking into account the current and future needs of residents in the locality while also considering the current and future needs of the planning district within which the locality is situated. □ COST - Recommended improvements shall include cost estimates as available from VDOT. □ FEES (SEE BELOW) For an amendment to a comprehensive plan or transportation plan, the locality shall provide one paper and one electronic copy of the following: □ A COVER SHEET, containing: □ CONTACT INFORMATION for the locality; □ A SUMMARY OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT or amendments to the comprehensive plan or transportation plan; up c d c r s a c s c s y p f e f s f o r o u t e j c d e s c r i p t i o n p m s c s t a r t s c o p e a l l e x p e s t i m a t e f s o b s c s t a r t a l l e x p e s t i m a t e f s o b s c s t a r t a l l e x p e s t i m a t e f s o b o r d p r o g ram 10 7 3 9 2 8 P 7 1 5 0 0 1 7 0 3 4 I n t . R t e . 1 7 / 5 0 / 7 9 7 T r a f f i c S i g n a l Re b u i l d , F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Tr u e , M U 1 2 / 0 2 / 1 5 0 1 / 1 2 / 1 6 1 0 0 % 8 2 % $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 N 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 6 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 4 4 5 , 0 0 0 V D O T 94 8 4 7 8 P 1 1 5 Y Y 0 0 1 1 0 3 4 # H B 2 . F Y 1 7 A d d t h r u l a n e f r o m I 8 1 t o Rt 3 7 & l t t u r n l a n e s . ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Ga r d n e r , C U 0 6 / 3 0 / 1 1 0 8 / 0 7 / 1 3 1 0 0 % 8 6 % $ 3 7 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 N 1 1 / 0 8 / 1 6 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 2 , 1 2 5 , 7 5 5 H 3 1 V D O T 10 0 5 4 7 8 S 1 1 5 Y Y Y 0 6 6 1 0 3 4 A d d i n g R i g h t T u r n L a n e t o R t 6 6 1 t o So u t h R t e 1 1 ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Ga r d n e r , C U 0 8 / 1 9 / 1 1 0 8 / 0 7 / 1 3 1 0 0 % 8 4 % $ 3 2 5 , 0 0 0 T Y U 0 7 / 2 1 / 1 4 0 7 / 2 1 / 1 4 A 1 0 0 % 7 5 % $ 1 4 0 , 0 0 0 Y N 1 1 / 0 8 / 1 6 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 6 9 4 , 5 8 3 P V D O T 10 8 5 8 8 8 I W 1 5 0 0 8 1 0 3 4 I - 8 1 N B R A M P A T R O U T E 7 Q U E U E PR E - E M P T I O N I N S T A L L ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Bo n d , M U 0 8 / 2 6 / 1 6 0 9 / 1 9 / 1 6 1 0 0 % 6 8 % $ 5 , 0 0 0 $ 0 N 0 2 / 0 7 / 1 7 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 5 7 , 3 3 5 V D O T 10 1 2 0 4 8 S 8 1 3 Y 0 6 5 9 0 3 4 I m p r o v e A l i g n m e n t V a l l e y M i l l R d a t Rt . 7 ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da m r o n , S U 1 0 / 2 7 / 1 5 1 0 0 % 1 1 % $ 3 5 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 N 0 5 / 0 1 / 1 7 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 6 , 8 5 0 , 0 0 0 L o c a l l y 59 2 5 9 8 S 1 1 5 Y Y 0 6 5 5 0 3 4 R T E 6 5 5 - R E C O N S T R U C T I O N (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Ho u s m a n , J U 0 6 / 0 4 / 0 7 0 5 / 1 1 / 1 0 1 0 0 % 7 3 % $ 1 , 0 1 8 , 5 9 5 Y U 0 9 / 1 1 / 1 2 0 3 / 0 1 / 1 3 A 1 0 0 % 4 1 % $ 9 9 8 , 6 9 5 Y N 0 4 / 1 3 / 1 8 5 8 % 0 % $ 6 , 4 8 5 , 5 4 6 V D O T 94 8 4 6 8 S 8 1 2 Y 9 9 9 9 0 3 4 C o m p l e t i o n T e v i s r d f r o m C i t y o f Wi n c h e s t e r t o R t . 5 2 2 ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Da m r o n , S U 0 6 / 0 1 / 1 1 1 0 0 % 1 4 % $ 1 , 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 $ 0 N 0 7 / 0 2 / 1 8 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 L o c a l l y 87 6 1 6 8 S 8 1 3 Y 0 7 8 8 0 3 4 R e v e n u e S h a r i n g - T e v i s S t r e e t Ex t e n s i o n ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da m r o n , S U 0 7 / 0 1 / 1 3 1 0 0 % 8 % $ 3 8 9 , 1 4 1 L 1 1 / 2 8 / 1 4 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 1 8 9 , 0 0 5 N 0 7 / 0 2 / 1 8 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 9 , 0 1 3 , 2 5 8 L o c a l l y 10 9 3 7 1 8 S 4 1 2 Y Y 0 6 6 1 0 3 4 R t . 6 6 1 - I n s t a l l N e w 8 x 8 H o u s e a n d Ci r c u i t r y ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Hu f f m a n , G N 0 7 / 1 0 / 1 8 1 0 0 % $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 R a i l 10 7 0 2 0 8 P 1 1 2 Y Y 0 0 3 7 0 3 4 R T E 3 7 - S A F E T Y I M P R O V E M E N T S (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Sc o t t , A N 1 0 / 1 3 / 1 7 1 0 0 % $ 7 5 , 0 0 0 N 0 8 / 1 4 / 1 8 1 0 0 % $ 3 , 2 5 0 , 0 0 0 V D O T 10 7 2 2 7 8 S 8 1 2 Y 1 5 3 8 0 3 4 C o v e r s t o n e D r i v e E x t e n s i o n - Fr e d e r i c k C o u n t y ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da m r o n , S N 1 2 / 1 3 / 1 6 1 0 0 % $ 4 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 1 2 / 1 2 / 1 8 1 0 0 % $ 3 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 L o c a l l y 10 8 6 7 2 8 S 8 1 2 Y 0 0 0 0 0 3 4 J u b a l E a r l y D r i v e E x t e n s i o n - Fr e d e r i c k C o u n t y ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da m r o n , S N 0 1 / 0 5 / 1 7 1 0 0 % $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 3 / 0 7 / 1 9 6 3 % $ 1 8 , 5 6 0 , 0 0 0 L o c a l l y 10 1 4 3 5 8 S 1 1 3 Y 0 6 6 1 0 3 4 R e l o c a t e R t . 6 6 1 R e d B u d R o a d (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da n a , M U 0 1 / 0 7 / 1 5 1 0 0 % 4 5 % $ 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 7 / 2 3 / 1 8 0 1 / 2 9 / 1 6 S 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 7 / 0 9 / 1 9 7 % 0 % $ 1 , 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 V D O T 10 4 2 6 2 8 S 8 1 3 Y R S 1 4 0 3 4 A i r p o r t R o a d a n d W a r r i o r D r i v e Ex t e n s i o n ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da m r o n , S U 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 6 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 6 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 3 / 3 0 / 1 8 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 9 / 3 0 / 1 9 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 4 , 9 5 0 , 0 0 0 L o c a l l y 18 0 0 3 8 P 1 1 5 Y Y Y 0 2 7 7 0 3 4 # H B 2 . F Y 1 7 R T E 2 7 7 - W I D E N T O 5 LA N E S ( F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Ma r a n d o , T U 0 9 / 1 8 / 9 7 0 5 / 2 2 / 1 4 1 0 0 % 6 6 % $ 4 , 8 0 0 , 0 0 0 T Y L 0 9 / 3 0 / 1 6 1 0 / 2 8 / 1 6 S 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 1 4 , 4 5 2 , 8 0 8 N 1 1 / 1 2 / 1 9 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 1 6 , 6 8 2 , 0 7 0 V D O T 90 1 7 3 8 S 1 1 5 Y Y Y 0 6 2 3 0 3 4 R t e 6 2 3 - R E P L A C E B R I D G E O v e r Ce d a r C r e e k V A s t r . 6 9 0 8 ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Sc o t t , A U 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 0 0 9 / 0 4 / 1 2 1 0 0 % 6 5 % $ 5 7 9 , 0 0 0 T Y N 0 8 / 3 1 / 1 7 0 3 / 3 0 / 1 7 S 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 5 0 , 0 0 0 N 1 1 / 1 2 / 1 9 1 0 2 % 0 % $ 1 , 5 1 7 , 6 2 9 V D O T 10 9 3 7 6 8 I 1 1 2 Y Y Y 0 0 8 1 0 3 4 # H B 2 . F Y 1 7 I - 8 1 E x i t 3 2 3 N B A c c e l an d S B D e c e l L a n e E x t e n s i o n (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Sc o t t , A N 0 8 / 1 4 / 1 7 1 0 0 % $ 6 8 2 , 1 0 8 Y N 1 1 / 1 2 / 1 9 1 0 0 % $ 2 , 7 6 8 , 7 9 6 V D O T 10 4 0 2 0 8 P 1 1 2 Y Y 0 0 1 7 0 3 4 B r i d g e ( F e d I D 8 0 5 5 ) R t e 1 7 Mi l l w o o d p i k e O v e r I - 8 1 ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Ja v i e r , E L 0 5 / 1 5 / 1 3 0 % $ 2 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 3 / 2 8 / 1 7 0 3 / 2 8 / 1 7 S 0 % $ 2 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 1 2 / 1 0 / 1 9 0 % $ 2 4 , 5 0 0 , 0 0 0 V D O T 88 6 5 9 8 I 1 1 3 Y Y Y 0 0 8 1 0 3 4 P E f o r I - 8 1 E x i t 3 0 7 I n t e r Re l o c a t i o n \ I m p r o v e m e n t ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Al e x a n d e r , S U 0 4 / 0 2 / 1 2 1 0 0 % 3 5 % $ 1 , 3 0 0 , 0 0 0 Y $ 0 N 0 7 / 1 4 / 2 0 $ 0 V D O T 88 8 2 0 8 I 1 1 3 Y Y Y 0 0 8 1 0 3 4 I - 8 1 I n t e r c h a n g e S t u d y f o r E x i t 3 1 3 (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Al e x a n d e r , S U 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 2 1 0 0 % 3 1 % $ 2 , 0 2 8 , 0 3 1 Y $ 0 N 0 7 / 1 4 / 2 0 $ 0 V D O T 10 7 0 2 2 8 P 1 1 2 Y Y 0 0 5 0 0 3 4 R T E 5 0 - S A F E T Y I M P R O V E M E N T S (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Sc o t t , A N 1 0 / 1 1 / 1 9 1 0 0 % $ 1 0 0 , 0 0 0 N 0 8 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 0 0 % $ 4 , 7 0 0 , 0 0 0 V D O T 10 9 3 2 5 8 P 1 1 2 Y Y 0 0 1 1 0 3 4 # H B 2 . F Y 1 7 R o u t e 1 1 S . A p p l e V a l l e y Rd . R i g h t T u r n L a n e ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Sc o t t , A L 0 9 / 1 5 / 1 6 1 0 0 % $ 6 2 , 3 6 2 Y N 1 0 / 2 3 / 1 9 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 9 S 1 0 0 % $ 2 4 4 , 5 6 5 N 1 0 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 0 0 % $ 2 0 7 , 7 7 7 V D O T 10 9 3 2 6 8 S 1 1 2 Y Y 0 7 6 7 0 3 4 # H B 2 . F Y 1 7 F o x D r i v e T u r n L a n e s (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Sc o t t , A L 0 9 / 1 6 / 1 6 1 0 0 % $ 9 8 , 9 5 8 Y N 1 0 / 2 4 / 1 9 1 0 / 0 2 / 1 9 S 1 0 0 % $ 2 1 9 , 4 2 3 N 1 0 / 1 3 / 2 0 1 0 0 % $ 3 3 2 , 6 1 5 V D O T 86 3 1 6 8 S 1 1 5 Y Y Y 0 7 2 3 0 3 4 # S G R R o u t e 7 2 3 o v e r O p e q u o n Cr e e k V a s t r u c 6 9 0 4 ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Uh l , J U 0 7 / 1 9 / 1 0 0 4 / 1 4 / 1 1 1 0 0 % 5 0 % $ 3 8 5 , 0 0 0 Y N 1 1 / 3 0 / 1 8 0 4 / 0 2 / 1 8 S 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 4 5 , 6 0 4 T Y N 1 1 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 0 2 % 0 % $ 1 , 4 2 6 , 4 6 9 V D O T 10 9 3 6 7 8 S 5 1 2 Y 1 0 1 2 0 3 4 T o w n R u n L n . L e f t T u r n L a n e a t St i c k l e y D r . - F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da m r o n , S N 1 0 / 1 4 / 1 6 2 0 % $ 2 5 , 0 0 0 N 1 1 / 2 1 / 1 9 1 0 / 3 0 / 1 9 S 0 % $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 N 1 1 / 1 0 / 2 0 0 % $ 1 1 5 , 0 0 0 V D O T 78 8 2 5 8 P 1 1 5 Y Y 0 5 2 2 0 3 4 R o u t e 5 2 2 , F r e d . C o . , S t r . I D 0 8 1 5 6 Br g R e p l . F e d I D - 0 8 1 5 6 ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Jo h n s t o n , J U 1 2 / 1 5 / 0 8 0 4 / 0 2 / 1 3 1 0 0 % 5 0 % $ 2 2 3 , 1 8 4 N 0 2 / 2 8 / 1 8 0 1 / 3 1 / 1 8 S 1 0 0 % 0 % $ 2 0 , 0 0 0 N 1 1 / 0 9 / 2 1 3 5 8 % 0 % $ 1 , 3 0 9 , 9 7 3 V D O T 10 7 0 2 7 8 S 4 5 0 Y Y Y 0 6 2 1 0 3 4 R T 6 2 1 - I n s t a l l C o n t r o l B o x & N e w LE D F l a s h i n g L i g h t s & G a t e s (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Hu f f m a n , G 0 7 / 0 1 / 1 5 $ 0 $ 0 U 0 5 / 1 1 / 1 6 0 5 / 1 1 / 1 6 S 1 0 9 % $ 1 4 6 , 5 8 6 P Y R a i l 10 7 0 3 0 8 S 4 5 0 Y Y Y 0 6 7 1 0 3 4 R T 6 7 1 - I n s t a l l N e w L E D F l a s h i n g Li g h t s & G a t e s , C o n t r o l B o x (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Hu f f m a n , G 0 7 / 0 1 / 1 5 $ 0 $ 0 U 0 5 / 1 2 / 1 6 0 5 / 1 2 / 1 6 S 1 0 0 % $ 2 7 0 , 4 3 6 P Y R a i l 10 7 0 2 8 8 S 4 5 0 Y Y Y 0 6 8 4 0 3 4 R T 6 8 4 - I n s t a l l N e w C o n t r o l Bo x & r e u s e L E D F l a s h i n g L i g h t s (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Hu f f m a n , G 0 7 / 0 1 / 1 5 $ 0 $ 0 U 0 5 / 1 2 / 1 6 0 5 / 1 2 / 1 6 S 1 1 8 % $ 8 9 , 0 3 6 P Y R a i l 10 7 0 2 9 8 S 4 5 0 Y Y Y 0 6 2 0 0 3 4 R T 6 2 0 - U p g r a d e C i r c u i t r y a n d R e u s e Ca n t i l e v e r L E D L i g h t s ( F r e d e r i c k Co u n t y ) Hu f f m a n , G 0 7 / 0 1 / 1 5 $ 0 $ 0 U 0 5 / 1 2 / 1 6 0 5 / 1 2 / 1 6 S 1 4 9 % $ 5 3 , 6 3 1 P Y R a i l 10 5 5 8 6 8 P 1 1 2 Y 0 0 3 7 0 3 4 R T E 3 7 E a s t e r n B Y P A S S ( P h a s e I I ) (F r e d e r i c k C o u n t y ) Da n a , M L 0 8 / 1 1 / 1 4 0 % $ 4 , 2 3 6 , 6 2 4 VDOT ro w n2 p a w a r d / s t a r t c o m m e n t s 72 M o n t h P r o j e c t D e l i v e r y S c h e d u l e St a u n t o n - 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 6 - 1 0 / 0 1 / 1 8 Pr e l i m i n a r y E n g i n e e r i n g ( P E ) R i g h t - o f - w a y P h a s e ( R W ) C o n s t r u c t i o n P h a s e ( C N ) 16 6 0 GRAY CGC 08/16/2016 - On schedule for 11/16 AD pending HB2 funds. AD DATE CHANGE APPROVED (OUT TO: 11/16 FR: 2/15) Additional Funds needed (Appox. $1.0 M) County does not have addtional funds aviable. AD date dependent on FUNDING G i t h U P C 1 0 0 5 4 7 S Y P S h d & E t i l t d [ H B 2 16 6 1 GRAY CGC 08/16/2016- Project on schedule for 11/16 AD (pending HB2 funding of UPC 94847) AD DATE CHANGE APPROVED (OUT TO: 11/16 FR: 2/15) AD date dependent on FUNDING of UPC 94847 (Project associated w/ UPC 94847). E t i t & S O K S h d l d f i d P R O J E C T W I L L B E S U B M I T T E D 16 5 5 GRAY MAT 10/11/2016 - Project open to CN. Task has been sent to contractor. 17 2 3 Gray JLE 9/19/16: Est. & Fund. short for CN, RW NTP rec'd 3/1/13. ROW Negotiations underway. Permit start date moved to 2015. Preparing project for d d d i f b i l b l E t i t d t d 9 / 1 6 ( T L J 3 / 1 9 / 1 3 16 8 0 YELLOW: SKD 09/19/16 - Sch, Funds, RW ok -- Scoping held on 03/26/14. Provided Cnty 30% Plan Comments last fall Cnty has not heard back from 16 7 5 Gray MB 09-19-2016: Reviewing plans and estimate. 17 3 8 Gray MLB 09/19/16: New rail project no work at this time. 17 3 5 Major Bridge YELLOW: SKD 09/19/16 - Developer agreement signed project to move forward. 30% Plans Complete. [Potential 9/16 Smart Scale App. RDB 8/16/16] 17 3 4 Major Bridge YELLOW: SKD 09/19/16 - Developer agreement signed project to move forward. 30% Plans Complete. [Potential 9/16 Smart Scale App. RDB 8/16/16] 17 8 0 GRAY:SKD 09/19/16 - Frederick County Revenue Sharing Project 17 6 9 GRAY: SKD 09/19/16 - Frederick County Rev Sharing Project. Project not moving forward and maybe dropped and funds reallocated. 17 4 1 Gray ANS 08/16/16: New project. Awaiting PE authorization. Insufficient funds.. Funding allocations scheduled for fY 2018, 2019 and 2020. 17 9 2 Major YELLOW: SKD 09/19/16 - Developer agreement signed project to move forward. 30% Plans Complete. 17 9 3 Major - YELLOW MPD 08/19/2016: Noise study almost complete; RW working on RW300/301 sumbitted to RW for 300/301 review mid November; some minor plan i i i F d d i S t S l / H B 2 C T B d $ 2 M t f f 17 8 6 Gray - PM MPD 8/16/2016 by SKD - Survey Underway. Begin Pre-Scoping project, alignment evaluation underway. The current estimate only reflects funds that were t f d t t h i j t R / W h h l d b i i l t i f f d b 17 9 9 8/16/16, Gray ANS: No plan project, funding not available until FY18, reviewed schedule. Survey in progress. [#HB2.FY17_10 RDB 8/16] 18 0 0 Major Bridge Gray EAJ 8/12/2016 (TLJ3/19/13 GovList, P7, Goes w/ IMR 88820) Prescoping stage. Waiting for IMR completion. 17 9 6 Gray, ANS, 08/16/16 PE & R/W funded.. Schedule has been revised. Project has completed Design Approval phases and is working on FI phase.I Environmental document completed. 18 1 2 Gray ANS 8/16/16: New project. Awaiting PE authorization. Insufficient funding available. Funding scheduled for FY 2020 and 2021. 18 0 8 Major - Gray PM SAA 09/19/16: No-build, relocation, and improve-in-current-location will all be carried forward to EA. Environmental inventory/survey area expanded to fully include corridor and still underway. Anticipate EA and location PH in i n e a r l 2 0 1 7 e p l o r i n g i n i t i a t i n g a s t a t s p d a t e / i c e b r e a k i n g i n N o e m b e r 18 0 9 Major - Gray SAA 09/19/16: IMR to transition to bridge widening justification only. SmartScale application under development. Current IMR contract will be closed out ith I t h A l i t t t l d i G i t h U P C 18 1 9 Bridge Gray JSU 10/12/16: Preparing Stage 1 report, then Detail Design Phase. [#SGR.FY17_8 RDB 6/22/16] 18 1 4 9/01/16, Gray ANS: No plan project, budget good, schedule good. Survey in progress, Requested PE authorization 8/31/16. preparing to scope project. [#HB2.FY17_14 RDB 8/16] 18 1 5 8/19/16, Gray ANS: No plan project if R/W is not an issue, schedule good. Survey in progress, preparing to scope project. [#HB2.FY17_13 RDB 8/16] 18 7 8 Gray Rail MLB 09/19/16: Project is under construction but no charges yet. 18 3 3 Bridge Gray JTJ 9/16/16 - Project fully funded. Re-investigating scope and moving towards PFI 18 2 4 GRAY: SKD 09/19/16 - Frederick County SSYP project to improve Town Run and Stickley Dr. intersection. [#HB2.FY17_11A RDB 8/16] 18 9 4 GRAY - MPD 9/20/2016: Project NOT recommended for HB2 funding. Project is dependent on UPC 85972 (IJR phase); cannot advance design until traffic d t i l t P j t b j t t H B 2 ( G i t h U P C 8 5 9 7 2 18 7 9 Gray Rail MLB 09/19/16: Project is under construction but no charges yet. 18 8 0 Gray Rail MLB 09/19/16: Project is under construction but no charges yet. 18 8 1 Gray Rail MLB 09/19/16: Project is under construction but no charges yet. R u n T i m e : 1 0 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 6 2 : 2 1 : 4 3 P M 1 of 1 THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 1 TRANSPORTATION V. TRANSPORTATION THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2 TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION CURRENT CONDITIONS Frederick County has grown significantly in the past two decades in both population and economic development, placing a significant demand upon the transportation system. Current County policy follows State Code guidance to ensure that new development offsets its impacts to the transportation system. A significant portion of congested roadways in the County can be linked to by-right development that does not offset its transportation impacts since it is not required by the Code of Virginia. This has had the greatest impact upon Interstate 81 and the primary highways in the County. Primary Highways include Routes 37, 522, 50, 7, 277 and 11. Based upon the most recent Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) data available (2016) Frederick County has 1,853 lane miles of roadway that are part of the state system. As of 2014, VDOT estimates that vehicles traveled 3,040,103 miles per day on Frederick County roadways. This is an over 200% increase since 1990. The vast majority of this travel is focused upon the Interstate and Primary systems. Planning Activities Transportation planning for Frederick County takes place in many ways. In addition to local comprehensive planning, Frederick County is a member of the WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization. As part that organization the County participates in regional long range planning and has access to resources for numerous other planning studies. In addition, the County annual updates the Frederick County Interstate, Primary, and Secondary Road Plans which highlight key priorities. Finally, the County also regularly conducts small area plans such as the Northeast Land Use Plan and the 277 Triangle Land Use Plan which focus on smaller portions of the County. With the exception of a situation where the small area plan is more detailed, any discrepancy between the two plans will be resolved by the Eastern Road Plan. Urban Areas It is the County’s policy to focus future growth in the Urban Areas, within the boundaries of the Urban Development Area (UDA) and Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA). In addition, the County has recently taken additional steps for growth within the UDA by adopting a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) ordinance which allows by-right residential development rights to be sold by landowners in the Rural Areas to landowners inside the UDA. Ultimately, while this results in increased traffic in the UDA, this is still a net financial benefit to the County. This allows the County and State to focus roadway improvements within the UDA as opposed to having to expand roadways throughout the entire County. The Eastern Road Plan is the guide to THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 3 TRANSPORTATION roadway development/improvements in and around the Urban Areas. As of the year 2000 census, the urbanized portions of Frederick County, Winchester, and Stephens City area reached the population threshold (50,000) that led to the federally required creation of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). In Frederick County the MPO boundary is concentrated around the development in the eastern section, and along Route 11 to West Virginia in the north and to Stephens City in the South. Staffed by the Northern Shenandoah Valley Regional Commission, the MPO is responsible for creating a long range transportation plan that meets air quality standards. The MPO is currently operating under the 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP); a planned update will be undertaken in 2016. Rural Areas Improvements to secondary roads in the more rural western portion of the County are focused on safety and maintenance as opposed to creating additional capacity. The possible exception to this would be areas where the Comprehensive Plan proposes the development of Rural Community Centers. Capacity and safety improvements to primary roadways in the rural areas will be addressed on an as needed basis. Transportation funding for improvements in Frederick County has largely been accomplished through development proffers and the VDOT Revenue Sharing Program. Whenever possible, the County uses public-private partnerships to make improvements. The County is also active in the areas of rail access funding and economic development road access funding. The Commonwealth’s role in transportation funding has been declining over the years and has now reached the point where some federal funds are being used for maintenance with very little new construction taking place. The State has been actively encouraging localities to take on maintenance of their road systems. However, roadway construction and maintenance in Frederick County primarily remains the responsibility of the State and Federal Government. How the County, State, and Federal governments work together to create a long term funding policy for transportation will have far reaching impacts on transportation systems in Frederick County. Recent Transportation Legislation, the Smart Scale Program (formerly HB2) and HB1887, has significantly changed the process by which transportation projects will be funded within the Commonwealth. The stated purpose of the new system is to score transportation projects and remove politics from the decision making process. Based on Commonwealth Transportation Board (CTB) adopted criteria, economic development is the most influential factor in scoring criteria for Frederick County. The County will continue to coordinate with the Economic Development Authority (EDA) to highlight the economic development importance of key roadways and improvements. During the first round of the Smart Scale program the County was successful on a number of applications, the most significant of which was Route 277 from I- 81 Exit 307 to Double Church Road which includes widening, access THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 4 TRANSPORTATION management for safety and a realignment of the Aylor Road intersection away from the interchange. FOCUS FOR THE FUTURE In the next twenty to thirty years it is expected that a number of key transportation milestones will be reached. The issue of long-term road construction funding must be resolved, which will allow significant transportation system improvements to move forward. Most crucial is the completion of the Route 37 East bypass, which is critical for both residential and economic development traffic. Completion of this roadway has been a top priority for Frederick County for many years. The Eastern Road Plan will continue to guide road projects and will evolve to address the long range transportation needs of the County. The County will work to insure that development and transportation agencies routinely design and operate the entire right-of-way to enable safe access for drivers, transit users and vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclists, as well as for older people, children, and people with disabilities. This goal aims to balance the diverse needs of all users of the public right-of-way and promote an integrated, multi-modal (or multiple modes of transportation) transportation system. Simply put, this means that the County will consider all potential users of the transportation system when making improvements, working with development, or constructing new facilities. This goal will benefit Frederick County as it addresses important safety, health, and environmental considerations, and promotes growth and revitalization within the Community. Over time, it is expected that private transit options will begin to play a larger role in Frederick County’s transportation network. This would likely begin with demand type services for the special needs populations, elderly, and disabled. As densities increase in the UDA and citizen preferences continue to shift, it is expected that bicycle and pedestrian accommodations will continue to increase in importance. The Frederick County School System has opened its first elementary school (Greenwood Mill Elementary) with a walk zone, and they plan to continue promotion of this type of school. Finally, with the growth potential of the Virginia Inland Port in Warren County, Frederick County can expect a continuing increase in freight movement via rail and roadways. The development of the County’s transportation infrastructure should continue to address transportation improvements that will further the economic growth of the Community. This would also include future growth of the Winchester Regional Airport. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 5 TRANSPORTATION COMMUNITY BENEFITS The benefits to the community of a healthy transportation system are immeasurable. An efficient transportation system leads to communities that are less stressed, healthier, less polluted, safer, and more attractive to economic development opportunities and new residents. A policy that creates an interconnected system of bicycle and pedestrian facilities will lead to a healthier and fitter community as well as increased home values. Removal of cars from the roadway would reduce congestion and air pollution. The mixed use land use pattern promoted by New Urbanism and the Urban Center concept of this Plan further promotes these policies. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 6 TRANSPORTATION The transportation system is also a key consideration for business locations. An efficient transportation system will make the County more attractive to new businesses and will also keep existing businesses from looking to locate elsewhere. In addition, continued focus in intermodal opportunities (the transfer of goods between different transportation modes such as truck to rail or air) in the area will make the county more attractive to businesses looking to take advantage of rail sidings or locations near the airport. The County’s willingness to support both road and rail access funding has already led to increased economic development interest. The result is more jobs for County citizens as well as a more valuable and diverse tax base. As residential and commercial development continues, increasing demands will be placed upon the County’s transportation infrastructure. Challenges will continue to be placed on the County by users of Interstate 81 and commuters through the area. The role of Frederick County is to first plan the transportation system and then work with new and existing development to preserve corridor rights-of- way and implement construction needs. It is the role of the State and Federal government along with development to fund transportation improvements necessary to ensure the future health of the County’s transportation network. GOALS/STRATEGIES GOAL: TO PROMOTE THE DEVELOPMENT OF NEW ROADWAYS AND THE REDEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING ROADWAYS IN A MANNER THAT MAKES THEM OPEN, AVAILABLE, AND SAFE TO ALL MODES OF TRANSPORTATION. STRATEGIES:  Match desired form of development to roadway classification to simplify the determination of which roadways receive which treatment. That is, different types of streets for different land uses. For example, while some roadways would require a separate bicycle and pedestrian trail in order to be more accessible to bicyclists and pedestrians. In rural areas a wider shoulder section may be more appropriate.  Work with new development and redevelopment to implement this policy and the overall transportation plan. This may require analysis and modification of the existing subdivision ordinance.  Work cooperatively with the School Board to identify school locations that meet both school and County goals of public access and safe walkability. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7 TRANSPORTATION  Seek outside funding sources to fill in gaps in order to attach separate segments and create a fully interconnected system. GOAL: IMPLEMENT THE ROADWAY PRIORITIES OF THE COUNTY AS OUTLINED ANNUALLY IN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN, THE INTERSTATE, PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ROAD PLANS, AND THE EASTERN ROAD PLAN, AND PARTICULARLY ROUTE 37 EAST. STRATEGIES:  Work with new development and redevelopment to implement the Eastern Road Plan through construction and preservation of right-of- ways.  Continue to work closely with VDOT, State and Federal representatives, and any other available revenue sources to increase transportation.  In the absence of outside funding, continue to protect rights-of-way and move forward on planning transportation priorities.  Coordinate with VDOT to make sure the required percentage of maintenance funds to be spent on other accommodations is used on County priorities.  Maintain the character of the rural roadways in the County while addressing safety issues as they may arise. GOAL: IMPROVE UPON EXISTING TRANSPORTATION SAFETY AND SERVICE LEVELS IN THE COUNTY. STRATEGIES:  Coordinate with VDOT in the scoping and review of Traffic Impact Analyses (TIA).  Analyze VDOT Access Management standards and, when needed, adopt County standards that are stronger.  Work with new development and redevelopment to ensure that trip generation and new movements do not degrade the transportation system, increase delays, or reduce service levels.  Create an informal working group with Staff, VDOT, and law enforcement to identify and address safety concerns with coordination to be handled by Planning and Development and the Board’s Transportation Committee (TC). THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 8 TRANSPORTATION GOAL: FIND WAYS TO IMPLEMENT TRANSPORTATION NEEDS WHILE KEEPING THE COST OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY COMPETITIVE. WORK TO ENHANCE USE OF INTERMODAL FREIGHT MOVEMENT WHEREVER POSSIBLE. STRATEGIES: Coordinate with local business to maximize the use of Economic Development Road Access funding as well as Rail Access funding.  Actively work with rail carriers through the Economic Development Authority to maximize the amount of material that is shipped into and out of Frederick County via rail.  Perform a study to discern where opportunities to bring air freight into the regional airport may be available.  Work to encourage and maximize opportunities presented by expansion of the Virginia Inland Port and the new multimodal facility coming to Martinsburg, WV.  Make use of revenue sharing funds for development of industrial property when the Board of Supervisors determines that it is in the best interest of Frederick County.  Incorporate the Airport Master Plan into County planning efforts. GOAL: IMPROVE THE BEAUTY OF TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS AT THE COUNTY GATEWAYS AND ALONG COMMERCIAL ROADWAYS. STRATEGIES:  Work with VDOT to create roadway design plans that meet standards while beautifying local gateways and commercial corridors.  Through the Transportation Committee, develop a plan and actively promote corridor beautification. This should include working with local institutions to create more attractive County entrances into their facilities. GOAL: ENSURE SAFE OPERATION OF FIRE AND RESCUE VEHICLES AND SCHOOL BUSES. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 9 TRANSPORTATION STRATEGIES:  Investigate the existence and potential removal of barriers between neighborhoods that lead to delays in response, particularly for the Greenwood and Millwood companies.  Promote the adoption of a uniform locking technology acceptable to the Fire and Rescue Department for use on gated and locked emergency access points.  Analyze driving, road, and parking standards and actively seek Fire and Rescue Department input for driveways and roads to ensure that all approved developments are accessible by fire equipment. GOAL: PROVIDE COST-EFFECTIVE ALTERNATIVES TO AUTOMOBILE TRAVEL AS NEEDED, FOR THE ELDERLY, DISABLED, STUDENTS, AND WORK FORCE. STRATEGIES:  Coordinate with existing agencies such as Shenandoah Area Agency on Aging (SAAA) and Access Independence to secure outside funding to enhance service to the elderly and disabled in the community.  Make use of the Winchester-Frederick Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) resources to identify areas of most critical need.  Monitor existing data source updates to determine areas of growing need. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 10 TRANSPORTATION STATE CODE COMPLIANCE The Code of Virginia, section 15.2-2222.1, states specific requirements for the development of a transportation plan as it relates to comprehensive plans: B.1. As part of the comprehensive plan, each locality shall develop a transportation plan that designates a system of transportation infrastructure needs and recommendations that may include the designation of new and expanded transportation facilities and that support the planned development of the territory covered by the plan and shall include, as appropriate, but not be limited to, roadways, bicycle accommodations, pedestrian accommodations, railways, bridges, waterways, airports, ports, and public transportation facilities. The plan should recognize and differentiate among a hierarchy of roads such as expressways, arterials, and collectors. The Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) shall, upon request, provide localities with technical assistance in preparing such transportation plan. B.2. The transportation plan shall include a map that shall show road and transportation improvements, including the cost estimates of such road and transportation improvements as available from VDOT, taking into account the current and future needs of residents in the locality while considering the current and future needs of the planning district within which the locality is situated. This chapter addresses all of these Code of Virginia requirements, as well as new VDOT administrative requirements, and recognizes the integral link between transportation and land-use planning. New requirements are outlined below and discussed in further detail as appropriate within this chapter: This chapter has been reviewed by VDOT officials and has been determined to meet the requirements outlined in state code. PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS While many factors impact changes in transportation needs and patterns, the most significant factors impacting the transportation system in Frederick County are population and employment growth. Desired patterns for that growth and policies and strategies to support those patterns are outline earlier in this chapter of the comprehensive plan. As noted in the WinFred MPO 2035 Long Range Transportation Plan, population in Frederick County which was 78,305 in 2010 is expected to reach 153,945 by 2035. Employment which was 23,499 in 2010 is expected to reach 26,960 by 2035. This growth, particularly the population is expected to add significant stress to the Frederick County transportation system. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 11 TRANSPORTATION NEEDS ASSESSMENT A number of factors aid in determining near and long term needs in the County. While the most key input in determining needs and impacts is the modeling processes u ndertaken through the WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization, many factors help in determining needs such as coordination with the Virginia Department of Transportation, safety concerns, maintenance needs, citizen concerns, and economic development. Shown below are the 2035 Projected Volumes and Volume/Capacity Ratio maps from the modeling work done with the WinFred Metropolitan Planning Organization. These modeling outputs are a significant tool in determining and vetting near term as well as long ra nge transportation needs. Some of the County’s most immediate near term needs are as follows: Route 37 Route 37 has long been the County’s top priority and this continues to be true. The completion of the Route 37 loop around the eastern portion of the County will not only relieve congestion on numerous local routes that have become congested as the County has grown, but also offers relief on I-81 by helping to remove local trips from the interstate as well as offering an additional relief valve when there are incidents that lead to I-81 delays or closures. The segment of Route 37 that is of top priority i s from I-81 exit 310 to Route 522. This segment offers important additional connectivity between I-81 and Route 522, which, in addition to significantly aiding local travel, will offer improved access to the Virginia Inland Port. This roadway is also exp ected to ease congestion on Route 277 and at Exit 313. I-81 Exit 313 Bridge The I-81 Exit 313 Bridge has been identified as in need of replacement by VDOT due to it reaching the end of the time where routine maintenance can adequately address bridge issues. I-81 Exit 317 and Redbud Road This project would realign the northbound exit ramp of I-81 onto Route 11 to the location where Redbud road currently intersects Route 11. This would align the interstate ramps which are currently offset and allow the removal of a signal on Route 11 north. In addition this project would realign Redbud Road to a new intersection with Snowden Bridge Blvd. This project is expected to aid congestion and improve safety at this area of Route 11 north as well as reduce stacking of traffic at the exit ramps. Route 11 North Corridor Widening Modeling of the expected development along the Route 11 north corridor indicates a need for widening and access management to the entire corridor with the corridor to become 6 lanes to Cedar Hill Road and 4 lanes to the West Virginia State line. The most immediate need is to widen from Route 37 to Old Charlestown Road. THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 12 TRANSPORTATION Route 11 South Route 11 South, particularly in the vicinity of Apple Valley Road, Commonwealth Court, and the interchange with Route 37 is becoming increasingly congested as surrounding area economic development has taken place. Additional near term needs Renaissance Drive from Prosperity Drive to Shady Elm Valley Mill Road Reallignment Russell 150 Bridge over I-81 Airport Road Extension Tevis Street Extension Route 277 from Double Church Road to Warrior Drive Jubal Early Drive Extension and Interchange with Route 37 Intersection of Crestleigh and Senseny Road Fox Drive/Route 522 Intersection Improvements Papermill Road/Route 522 Intersection Improvements Apple Valley Road/Route 11 Intersection Improvements Sulphur Springs Road Improvements THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 13 TRANSPORTATION THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 14 TRANSPORTATION THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 15 TRANSPORTATION RECOMENDATIONS Project recommendations are included in the Current Needs Projects maps as well as the Eastern Road Plan which shows near and long range transportation needs. Please note that while the map of existing inventory and functional classifications shows the entire county, the maps depicting the planned transportation improvements are zoomed in to the areas where improvements are called for to improve readability of the maps. Below please find a table of projects which are currently in the VDOT Six Year Improvement Program and that have been recently applied for through the VDOT SmartScale process. VDOT UPC Description Route Estimate Notes (Values in Thousands of Dollars) T17535 I-81 EXIT 323 NB ACCEL AND SB DECEL LANE EXTENSION 81 $3,451 Approved SmartScale Project FY17 75881 RTE 81 - INTERCHANGE MODIFICATION, EXIT 310 81 $41,558 94847 ADD THRU LANE FROM I81 TO RT37& LT TURN LANES. 11 $2,501 Approved SmartScale Project FY17 109325 ROUTE 11 S. APPLE VALLEY RD. RIGHT TURN LANE 11 $515 Approved SmartScale Project FY17 18003 RTE 277 - WIDEN TO 5 LANES FROM EXIT 310 TO DOUBLE CHURCH ROAD AND REALIGN AYLOR ROAD 277 $35,935 Approved SmartScale Project FY17 104262 AIRPORT ROAD AND WARRIOR DRIVE EXTENSION 645 $5,600 REVENUE SHARING THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 16 TRANSPORTATION 108672 JUBAL EARLY DRIVE EXTENSION - FREDERICK COUNTY 0 $18,660 REVENUE SHARING 101204 IMPROVE ALIGNMENT VALLEY MILL RD AT RT. 7 659 $7,200 REVENUE SHARING 109326 FOX DRIVE TURN LANES 767 $651 Approved SmartScale Project FY17 105633 SNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD PHASE I 875 $8,137 REVENUE SHARING 107227 COVERSTONE DRIVE EXTENSION - FREDERICK COUNTY 1538 $4,000 REVENUE SHARING ROUTE 37 EXTENSION FROM TASKER ROAD TO ROUTE 522 37 $102,187 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 ROUTE 37 EXTENSION FROM TASKER ROAD TO WARRIOR DRIVE. WARRIOR DRIVE FROM EXISTING TERMINUS OF WARRIOR DRIVE TO ROUTE 37 37/1141 $49,510 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 EXIT 317 NB EXIT RAMP RELOCATION TO LOCATION WHERE REDBUD ROAD CURRRENTLY TIES INTO ROUTE 11 NORTH AND REALIGNMENT OF REDBUD ROAD TO SNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD 81/661 $11,239 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 17 TRANSPORTATION ROUTE 277 WIDENING FROM DOUBLE CHURCH ROAD TO WARRIOR DRIVE 277 $25,428 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 ROUTE 11 NORTH WIDENING FROM SNOWDEN BRIDGE BLVD TO OLD CHARLESTOWN ROAD 11 $28,346 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 SULPHUR SPRINGS ROAD RECONSTRUCTION AND WIDENING FROM ROUTE 50 TO THE LANDFILL 655 $2,704 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 INTERSECTION OF SENSENY ROAD AND CRESTLEIGH DRIVE- ADD TURN LANES ON SENSENY 657 $2,548 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 INTERSECTION OF 277 AND WARRIOR DRIVE, EXTEND EB RIGHT TURN LANE ON ROUTE 277 AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY IMPROVEMENTS ALONG THE SOUTHERN PART OF WARRIOR DRIVE 277/1141 $477 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 INTERSECTION OF PAPERMILL ROAD AND ROUTE 522, EXTEND RIGHT TURN LANE ON EB PAPERMILL ROAD 644 $507 Applied SmartScale Project FY18 EXIT 313 BRIDGE REDECKING AND INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS 81 MPO Applied SmartScale Project THE 2035 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 18 TRANSPORTATION FY18 ROUTE 11 SOUTH AT THE CITY/COUNTY LINE CORRIDOR AND INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS IN THE VICINITY OF SHAWNEE DRIVE AND OPEQUON CHURCH LANE 11 MPO Applied SmartScale Project FY18 !( City of Winchester Town ofStephens City 0111 0111 01522 0137 0111 01277 01522 01522 01522 01522 0111 01522 0150 017 01522 0150 0111 0137 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society 2035 Comprehensive Policy Plan Update MapDraft F 0 1 20.5 Miles Current Needs Projects Current Needs Projects Eastern Road Plan - Nov 2016 Improved Major Arterial Improved Major Collector Improved Minor Arterial Improved Minor Collector New Major Collector New Minor Arterial New Minor Collector Expressway Intersection Improvements !(New Exit 307 Interchange Park & Ride Commuter Lots Realignment of Redbud Rd to Snowden Bridge Blvd Realignment of I-81 Ramp to Redbud Rd Widen I-81 from Fairfax Pike to Route 37 N Widen Remainder of I-81 The Interstate 81 corridor is designatedas a corridor of statewide significance aspursuant of VA code 15.2 - 2232. City of Winchester Town ofStephens City StephensonRural CommunityCenter GainesboroRural CommunityCenter Clear Brook & BrucetownRural CommunityCenter Round HillRural CommunityCenter AlbinRural CommunityCenter ArmelRural CommunityCenter 0111 01277 0111 0111 017 01522 0137 0111 01522 0150 0150 0111 0137 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society 2035 C omprehensive Policy Plan Update MapDraft F 0 1 20.5 MilesThe Interstate 81 corridor is designatedas a corridor of statewide significance aspursuant of VA code 15.2 - 2232. Eas tern FrederickCounty Road PlanCross Sections Future Rt 37 Byp ass Sewer and Water Se rvice AreaUrban Develop me nt Area Rural Community C enter Eastern Road PlanCross Sections R4DU2U4D U6D Town ofMiddletown City of Winchester Town ofStephens City StephensonRural CommunityCenter GainesboroRural CommunityCenter Clear Brook & BrucetownRural CommunityCenter Round HillRural CommunityCenter GoreRural CommunityCenter Star TanneryRural CommunityCenter Cross JunctionRural CommunityCenter AlbinRural CommunityCenter Renolds StoreRural CommunityCenter ShawneelandRural CommunityCenter ArmelRural CommunityCenter 01259 0155 01259 01277 0111 01127 0111 017 0150 01522 0137 0150 01522 0150 0111 0137 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦66 §¨¦81 Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society Existing Conditions/Inventory and Functional Classifications ExpresswayInterstateMajor ArterialMinor ArterialMajor C ollectorMinor Co llecto rLocal Rd The Interstate 81 corridor is designatedas a corridor of statewide significance aspursuant of VA code 15.2 - 2232. 2035 Comprehensive Policy Plan Update MapDraft F Sewer and Wa ter Servic e AreaUrban Deve lopment Area George Washing ton Na tional Fores tRural C ommunity Center Frederick County Road Plan Existing Conditions/Inventoryand Functional Classifications 0 2.5 51.25 Miles City of Winchester Town ofStephens City StephensonRural CommunityCenter GainesboroRural CommunityCenter Clear Brook & BrucetownRural CommunityCenter Round HillRural CommunityCenter AlbinRural CommunityCenter ArmelRural CommunityCenter 0111 0111 01522 0137 0111 01277 01522 01522 01522 01522 0111 01522 0150 017 0150 0111 01522 0137 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 §¨¦81 Copyright: © 2013 National Geographic Society Eas tern FrederickCounty Road Plan F 0 1 20.5 MilesThe Interstate 81 corridor is designatedas a corridor of statewide significance aspursuant of VA code 15.2 - 2232. 2035 Comprehensive Policy Plan Update MapDraft Ea stern Road Pla n - Nov 2016 New Ma jor Arteria l Improved Major Arte rial New Minor Arte rial Improved Minor Arterial New Ma jor Colle ctor Improved Major Collec tor New Minor Collec tor Improved Minor C ollector Ramp Roundab out Trails Future Rt 37 Byp ass Sewer and Wate r Servic e AreaUrban Develop ment Area Rural Community C enter Item 2: Welltown Road/Rest Church Road Traffic Concerns Update Please find the attached data provided by the Sheriff’s office to aid in discussion of these issues. Item 3: Warren County Truck Restriction Request Attached please find communication received from Warren County seeking concurrence from Frederick County on a truck restriction of Reliance Road. Item 4: County Projects Update Snowden Bridge Blvd: Final items are being addressed as this project wraps up. Tevis Street Extension/Airport Road/I-81 Bridge: Bridge design in ongoing and environmental documents for VDOT are being completed. Renaissance Drive: Currently working with CSX on MOU for the future crossing. Engaged in communication with VDOT to answer questions that arise as we await a decision on Transportation Partnership Opportunity Fund application from the Governor’s office. Valley Mill Road Realignment: Thirty percent design has been completed and the County’s on call consultant is providing an updated cost estimate to complete design through 100%. Upon approval by the private party partner, the next phase of design will begin. Coverstone Drive: No activity at this time. Jubal Early Drive Extension and Interchange with Route 37: Initial meetings regarding a draft agreement and follow up application for additional revenue sharing funds has been held with the private partner team. Item 5: Other