PC 05-06-15 Meeting MinutesMEETING MINUTES
OF THE
FREDERICK COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
Held in the Board Room of the Frederick County Administration Building at 107 North Kent Street in
Winchester, Virginia on May 6, 2015.
PRESENT: June M. Wilmot, Chairman/Member at Large; Roger L. Thomas, Vice
Chairman/Opequon District; Gary R. Oates, Stonewall District; J. Stanley Crockett, Stonewall District;
Lawrence R. Ambrogi, Shawnee District; H. Paige Manuel, Shawnee District; J. Rhodes Marston, Back
Creek District; Greg L. Unger, Back Creek District; Kevin Kenney, Gainesboro District; Christopher M.
Mohn, Red Bud District; Charles F. Dunlap, Red Bud District: Roderick B. Williams, County Attorney;
Robert Hess, Board of Supervisors Liaison; Mark Loring, City of Winchester Liaison.
ABSENT: Charles E. Triplett, Gainesboro District; Robert S. Molden, Opequon District
STAFF PRESENT: Eric R. Lawrence, Planning Director; Michael T. Ruddy, Deputy Director; John A.
Bishop, Deputy Director -Transportation; Candice E. Perkins, Senior Planner; and Shannon L. Conner,
Administrative Assistant.
CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Wilmot called the May 6, 2015 meeting of the Frederick County Planning
Commission to order at 7:05 p.m. Chairman Wilmot commenced the meeting by inviting everyone to
join in a moment of silence.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Dunlap, the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the agenda with revisions for this evening's meeting.
MINUTES
Upon motion made by Commissioner Oates and seconded by Commissioner Crockett, the
Planning Commission unanimously adopted the minutes of their April 15, 2015 meeting.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3203
Minutes of May 6, 2015
COMMITTEE REPORTS
Frederick County Sanitation Authority (FCSA) — 4/21/15
Commissioner Unger reported total customer base for water is 14,348 and the total for
sanitary is 13,860. The rainfall total for March was 2.96 inches which is up and better than average for
the year. Water usage at the Diehl Plant was 2.2 mgd; water usage at the Anderson Plant was 1.8 mgd;
1.4 mgd was purchased from the City. The daily average use is 5.4 mgd, which has increased. Elevation
at the Diehl Plant is up approximately 5 feet to 649 and the Anderson Plant elevation remained the same.
Mr. Unger noted water loss has increased considerably to 14% due to leaks that are being located and
repaired. He also noted the test well at Lake Frederick has been drilled and testing continues.
Transportation Committee - 4/27/15 & 5/4/15
Commissioner Oates reported at the April 27, 2015 meeting the Kernstown Area Plan
was discussed. He also noted there will be a public meeting regarding the Kernstown Area Plan on May
26, 2015 at the Valley Farm Credit facility. Mr. Oates reported at the May 4, 2015 meeting House Bill 2
and the rating systems were discussed. He noted Frederick County is currently rated as a B and the
committee is seeking approval to ask for a change to be rated a C in order to be more competitive in
getting funding for roadways. Mr. Oates also reported a discussion was held on the six year road plan.
Development Review & Regulations Committee — 4/23/15
Commissioner Unger reported discussion was held regarding Farm Distilleries and the
revision was tweaked a little. He also noted a discussion was held regarding site plan requirements.
City of Winchester Planning Commission — 4/21/15
Commissioner Loring reported at their meeting approval was recommended for site
improvements at the old Coca Cola Plant. He also noted commercial remodeling at the old Long John
Silver building was recommended for approval.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3204
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Board of Supervisors Report — 4/22/15
Board of Supervisors' Liaison, Supervisor Robert loess, reported information was provided or.
MDP #01-15 Graystone Commerce Center and noted there were no comments or questions.
Citizen Comments
Chairman Wilmot called for citizen comments on any subject not currently on the
Planning Commission's agenda or any item that is solely a discussion item for the Commission. No one
came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the citizen comments portion of the meeting.
PUBLIC HEARING
Rezoning #02-15 Blue Ridge Youth Soccer Association, submitted by Painter -Lewis P.L.C. to
rezone 20.54 acres from the B2 (General Business) District to the RA (Rural Areas) District. This
property is located east of the City of Winchester, on the west side of US Highway 50/17, at the
southeastern corner of the intersection of Route 50/17 and W. Parkins Mill Road (Route 644). The
property is identified with Property Identification Number 77 -A -26A in the Shawnee Magisterial
District.
Action — Recommend Approval
Senior Planner, Candice E. Perkins reported this proposal is to rezone 20.54 acres from
the B2 (General Business) District to RA (Rural Areas) District. Ms. Perkins noted this application for a
downzoning from the B2 District to the RA District is accompanied with a Conditional Use Permit for an
outdoor soccer facility. Ms. Perkins explained the property was rezoned from the RA District to the B2
District with proffers with the approval of Rezoning #23-89 on November 8, 1989. She noted that while
the original rezoning included 23.2282 acres of land, this rezoning is for 20.54 acres of the site. A five
acre residential property was subsequently subdivided (that five acres is split zoned RA/B2) and that
property is not part of this downzoning. Ms. Perkins reported the land use proposed in this application is
consistent with the Comprehensive Policy Plan. She noted this site does not have access to public water
and sewer and is outside the limits of the SWSA; therefore the proposed downzoning of the site from the
B2 to the RA District is a positive rezoning.
Commissioner Oates noted he had no objections to this downzoning. Commissioner
Crockett stated this is a great idea for a downzoning and is in support of the idea.
Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing and called for anyone who wished to speak
regarding this request to come forward. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the
public comment portion of the hearing.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3205
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Upon motion made by Commissioner Manuel and seconded by Commissioner Ambrogi
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of Rezoning #02-15 Blue Ridge Youth Soccer Association, submitted by Painter -Lewis P.L.C.
to rezone 20.54 acres from the B2 (General Business) District to the RA (Rural Areas) District. This
property is located east of the City of Winchester, on the west side of US Highway 50/17, at the
southeastern corner of the intersection of Route 50/17 and W. Parkins Mill Road (Route 644). The
property is identified with Property Identification Number 77 -A -26A in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
(Note: Commissioners Triplett and Molden were absent from the meeting)
Conditional Use Permit #01-15 for Blue Ridge Youth Soccer Association, for a Commercial
Outdoor Recreation Facility. Those properties are located east of the City of Winchester, on the
west side of US Highway 50/17, at the southeastern corner of the intersection of Route 50/17 and W.
Parkins Mill Road (Route 644). The properties are identified with Property Identification
Numbers 77 -A -26A and 77 -A -26B in the Shawnee Magisterial District.
Action — Tabled for 45 Days by Majority Vote
Senior Planner, Candice E. Perkins reported this is a request by the Blue Ridge Youth
Soccer Association for a Conditional Use Permit for a commercial outdoor recreation facility on two
parcels of land that total 62 acres located on West Parkins Mill Road. This Conditional Use Permit would
enable the construction and operation of an outdoor soccer complex on the subject properties. Ms.
Perkins noted commercial outdoor recreation, athletic or park facilities are permitted uses in the RA
(Rural Areas) Zoning District with an approved Conditional Use Permit (CUP). She also noted this
proposed use would be conducted on two parcels that contain a total of 62 acres. Ms. Perkins stated this
is a general concept plan that the applicant provided, it is a draft and subject to final engineering that is
completed at the site plan stage.
Ms. Perkins explained this property is surrounded by residential properties that are zoned
RA (Rural Areas). The proposed use and its traffic, lighting, and noise could impact the residential
properties. Ms. Perkins presented conditions drafted by staff that are an effort to mitigate those impacts.
The conditions specify site access, lighting, hours of operation, signage, restroom facilities, and buffering.
The suggested conditions are as follows:
1. All review agency comments and requirements shall be complied with at all times.
2. An engineered site plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Frederick County
Planning Department; all site plan improvements shall be implemented prior to
utilizing the facility.
3. Permanent bathroom facilities shall be provided on site.
4. One freestanding sign shall be permitted; this sign shall not exceed 12' in height and
50 square feet in size; this sign shall be located on West Parkins Mill Road.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3206
Minutes of May 6, 2015
5. Site lighting shall conform with 165-201.07F — Lighting Standards for Recreational
Facilities in all Zoning Districts (class III facility — full cutoff luminaries must be used
to control spill light). All lighting shall be turned off by 10:00 p.m.
6. A single row of evergreen trees 6' in height, planted a maximum of 8' on center, shall
be provided along any property line that boarders a residential dwelling, where
existing woodlands (minimum 50' width) are not present.
7. Hours of operation shall be 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
8. The property shall only have one entrance, and that entrance shall be onto West
Parkins Mill Road. There shall be no entrances onto Route 50. Emergency access
that is not open to the public may be shown if approved by VDOT.
9. Any expansion or change of use shall require a new Conditional Use Permit.
Ms. Perkins pointed out this Conditional Use Permit is for commercial outdoor recreation
soccer fields only and any other uses would not be included such as festivals, concerts, etc. These types
of items would require a festival permit and ultimately approval of the Board of Supervisors.
Commissioner Unger inquired what type of buffering or fencing will be around the
property for the neighbors. Ms. Perkins reiterated it is proposed that a single row of evergreen trees that
would be 6' in height and 8' on center would be required for properties that are residential and do not
have existing woodlands.
Commissioner Marston asked will this facility be a seven day a week operation and is
there a proposed schedule of how often the facility will be used. Mr. Stephen L. Pettler Jr., representing
the applicant responded, the anticipation is to use the facility as much as possible. He noted during
schools hours it would not be used, tournaments would be held on weekends, and in the evenings there
would be practices and some games.
Commissioner Manuel asked will there be buildings on this site. Ms. Perkins responded
at this time one restroom building is being proposed.
Commissioner Kenney asked if parking would be adequate for this facility. Ms. Perkins
noted the parking would be based on the ordinance for the number of fields and it would be planned for
the maximum.
Mr. Stephen L. Pettler Jr. noted it is difficult at this time to give precise answers to the
questions being asked and at this point BRYSA (Blue Ridge Youth Soccer Association) is just trying to
acquire the property. He explained there has been no engineering or site plan work done as of today and
obtaining the Conditional Use Permit would allow them to move forward. Mr. Pettler noted the
following: BRYSA has grown 29% from 2011-2014; the anticipated development would not happen for
at least two years; development would be completed in phases as BRYSA raises funds to offset costs.
Mr. Pettler also noted BRYSA is in agreement to Staff's proposed conditions.
Commissioner Unger asked if VDOT is going to be involved. Mr. Pettler responded the
comments from VDOT were "no measurable impact". He noted the issues being raised are ones that
have been discussed at BRYSA meetings. BRYSA has been looking for some time to put fields in the
county, this site is beneficial: there is easy access to Route 50, the land is relatively flat, and the price for
the property is very generous.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3207
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Commissioner Oates noted there will be a lot of grading involved in this process,
therefore having excess dirt. He explained with the excess dirt they could create a 6 foot berm to help
deaden the sound around the facility. He also noted berms are cheap and reasonable to put in place. Mr.
Oates feels this should be a condition put into the Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Dunlap expressed his concern is with the number of people that will be at
the facility. He is also concerned with the screening issues, especially the five acres that sits in the middle
of this proposal. He would like to see a more adequate buffer.
Commissioner Kenney inquired how the restrooms will be handled if not served by
SWSA. Mr. Pettler noted a pump and haul system has been discussed.
Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing and called for anyone who wished to speak
regarding this request to come forward. The following citizens came forward:
Mr. Edward Nail of 130 George Drive, Winchester VA came forward to speak. Mr. Nail
posed the following questions and concerns: will this facility be used for children or adults; lighting at
night; the noise this will create; will there be wells drilled on the property and if so how many; the buffer
trees are not adequate for this large of a facility; who will maintain the property; will there be any type of
security; can the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit change.
Mrs. Julie Boulais of 1148 W. Parkins Mill Road, Winchester VA came forward to voice
her concerns. She noted her property is the five acres in the middle of this proposal. Mrs. Boulais
explained her major concern is the pond on their property; she does not want it destroyed. She is also
concerned with the buffering, trash, security, and lighting.
Mr. Tommy Almond of 861 W. Parkins Mill Road, Winchester VA came forward and
stated his concerns in regards to the traffic flow given the large number of people that is anticipated. He
also noted there is not a traffic light at the intersection of Route 50 and Parkins Mill Road and that is a
concern.
Mrs. Jennifer Sheehy, owner and operator of Winchester Montessori located on Parkins
Mill Road stated her concerns: extra traffic this will bring on a narrow road; buffering does not appear to
be adequate; safety for all involved. Mrs. Sheehy noted she is in favor of the soccer fields but more study
needs to take place before this can go through.
Chairman Wilmot called for anyone else who wished to speak regarding this request to
come forward. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion
of the hearing.
Mr. Pettler concluded all concerns have been noted and he will be available after the
meeting to talk with neighbors and citizens.
Commissioner Unger said until more information is provided in regards to the number of
people, better traffic calculations, and lighting he cannot fully support this Conditional Use Permit at this
time.
Commissioner Thomas stated he does not think this proposal is that bad; however, he is
concerned with the amount of noise it will generate and is in support of requiring the 6 foot berm be
added to the conditions.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3208
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Commissioner Mohn stated the impacts are not nailed down enough for him to support.
He is in favor of adding the 6 foot berm to the conditions of Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Manuel noted he is in full support of this proposal and agrees with adding
the 6 foot berm to the conditions.
Commissioner Oates said he would like to see a fence put around the proposed property,
especially the pond area. He also noted, to enhance security, the facility should be fenced and gated. Mr.
Oates suggested BRYSA meet with all the neighboring property owners and fully discuss the buffering.
Chairman Wilmot noted there have been some interesting ideas presented that should be
considered and possibly adding them to the conditions of the Conditional Use Permit.
Commissioner Thomas made a motion to table this Conditional Use Permit application
for 45 days. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Ambrogi and passed by majority vote.
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby recommend tabling
Conditional Use Permit #01-15 for Blue Ridge Youth Soccer Association for 45 days.
(Note: Commissioners Triplett and Molden were absent from the meeting)
Rezoning #01-15 Blackburn Commerce Center submitted by Stowe Engineering, PLC., to rezone
128.56+/- acres as follows: 92.066+/- acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to MI (Light Industrial)
District and 36.754+/- acres are to remain RA (Rural Areas) with proffers. The property is located
adjacent to Dawson Drive, Apple Valley Road and Route 37 and is identified by Property
Identification Number 63 -A -80I in the Back Creek Magisterial District.
Action — Recommend Approval with Proffer Change
Commissioner Oates and Commissioner Marston would abstain from all discussion on
this item for a possible conflict of interest.
Deputy Planning Director, Michael T. Ruddy presented an overview of the proposed
application to rezone 92.066+/- acres of land from RA (Rural Areas) District to M1 (Light Industrial)
District with proffers to accommodate industrial uses. Mr. Ruddy noted the property is located within the
Sewer and Water Service Area (SWSA) and the proposed industrial land use designation for this property
is consistent with the current industrial land use supported by the 2030 Comprehensive Plan. He also
shared the 2030 Comprehensive Plan and the Southern Frederick Plan provide guidance on the future
development of this property. Mr. Ruddy explained with this rezoning, the applicant has proffered the
project will contribute to the transportation improvements in the vicinity of the property that have been
identified as important to the overall transportation solution for this general area. The application has
addressed the concerns identified by the various reviewing agencies and has worked with the Kernstown
Battlefield Association to reach an agreement that addresses the historical context of this rezoning.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3209
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Mr. Ruddy provided an overview of the Proffer Statement included with the application
for this rezoning:
Allowed Uses:
All of the uses permitted in the M 1 (Light Industrial) District would be allowed.
A Generalized Development Plan (GDP) has been used to illustrate the location of the
proposed landscape/greenspace/buffer area design features, the preservation of the pond
area, and the location of the two entrances to the property.
Access Management and Transportation:
Dawson Drive and the existing entrance onto Apple Valley Road as the two entrances for
the property.
Participate in the cost of transportation improvements in the nearby area. The method for
doing so is based upon a similar model used with the BPG rezoning application. The
Applicant will contribute to Frederick County a maximum of Six Hundred and Twenty
Five Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($625,000). Payments shall be made prior to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for all structures developed on the property.
Site Development:
Will develop the property with several building restrictions and landscape design features
aimed at mitigating the impact of the project on the adjacent residential and historical
properties. These include a maximum height limitation of sixty (60) feet for all structures
for a distance of one thousand feet from Apple Valley Road, the screening of all loading
docks from adjacent properties, and the provision of green space buffer areas between
Apple Valley Road and the development including the existing pond and a green space
buffer fifty (50) feet wide in the area along the zoning.
Mitigating the he Impact of Development
A cash contribution in the amount of $10,000 to be directed to Frederick County Fire and
Rescue to assist in the capital facility needs of the fire and rescue associate with the
development of the property.
Mr. Ruddy elaborated on the transportation impacts associated with this rezoning. He
explained the 2030 Comprehensive Plan identifies Shady Elm Road and Apple Valley Road as improved
major Collector Roads. It has been recognized that Route 11 is an Arterial Road to be improved.
Mr. Ruddy reported that as you head south of Route 37 on Shady Elm Road this is
ultimately a planned road that serves the industrial growth in the area. Mr. Ruddy noted the applicant
does not have the ability on their property or control of these properties to implement any of these
improvements at this time, and in addition there are no specific projects underway that they could
participate in. Mr. Ruddy noted a recent rezoning on the BPG Property took a very similar approach in
regards to the transportation perspective. The same calculation was used on this rezoning based on the
square footage of the building to be constructed to come up with a monetary contribution to be used for
transportation improvements in the area.
Mr. Tim Stowe, President of Stowe Engineering PLC, representing the Applicant
addressed the Planning Commission. Mr. Stowe explained the Applicant is intending on following a
business friendly approach with this rezoning. From a scheduling stand point they want to move rapidly
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3210
Minutes of May 6, 2015
with the development in order to have it ready for industries that may like to move in and develop the
property.
Mr. Stowe reported the Applicant has considered other factors such as the impacts on
neighbors. He noted other factors that have been studied by the Applicant: Buffers around the pond on
the property and along the M1 zoning line so the land will remain in its natural state; transportation has
been heavily studied and the number of entrances will be limited; met with Kernstown Battlefield
Association and have entered into an agreement. Mr. Stowe highlighted a few of the items in the
agreement with Kernstown Battlefield Association: minimal reflective glass on any building constructed
on the property; landscaping would be deciduous trees to the south and would be consistent with the
character of the property in the 1860's; construct a bus pull off for visitors; may do relic hunting on the
property prior to development. Mr. Stowe reiterated the goal of the applicant is to follow the business
friendly approach. He also stated they feel there are benefits that will come to the County from this
rezoning in the form of jobs, expanded industrial base of M1 land, and certainly tax revenue.
Commissioner Kenney inquired will the entrance onto Apple Valley Road be the primary
entrance. Mr. Stowe responded one of the challenges with the property is the wetlands. The wetlands
and their location push the development of the property to the south end. They are anticipating
approximately 50/50 split in the end and ultimately may be a little heavier on Dawson Drive.
Commissioner Thomas noted it appears the proffer that includes the $625,000 is prorated
based on the square footage being constructed and it will not be paid until the occupancy permit is issued,
he inquired if this is correct. Mr. Stowe responded that is correct in the proffer. Mr. Thomas asked if the
applicant would consider changing the proffer to providing the transportation funding when the
construction permit is issued rather than the occupancy permit. Mr. Ruddy noted there is flexibility in
regards to this proffer.
On behalf of the Applicant, Mr. Stowe offered to modify the proffer statement to reflect
that the transportation proffer be paid at issuance of the Building Permit rather than at issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Commissioner Thomas inquired if most traffic will be from trucks. Mr. Stowe noted that
the majority of the traffic is projected to be from employees.
Commissioner Unger requested comments be heard from Mr. john A. Bishop, Deputy
Director — Transportation. Mr. Bishop gave a brief overview of the existing traffic problems in the area
of the proposed rezoning. He noted the BPG rezoning was the same type of warehousing use and a very
good comparison in terms of a cash proffer based on square footage which is used to calculate the number
of trips on a TIA.
Commissioner Kenney inquired in today's dollars what $625,000 gets the County. Mr.
Bishop explained typically to signalize an intersection the cost is around $250,000. He also noted what
makes this proffer attractive is the ability to receive matching revenue sharing dollars.
Commissioner Thomas inquired what the process is to receiving revenue sharing funds.
Mr. Bishop explained these are typically applied for as soon as a project begins to take shape.
Chairman Wilmot opened the public hearing and called for anyone who wished to speak
regarding this request to come forward.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3211
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Mr. Bruce Dawson, owner of the adjacent industrial park came forward. He noted,
although he is in favor of this rezoning his concern is the large truck traffic on Dawson Drive. He stated
he would like to see traffic limited to strictly automobiles on the road.
Mr. Paul Peters of Jordan Drive came forward to voice his concerns regarding this
rezoning application. Mr. Peters noted his property is quite elevated, thus giving him full view of this
property and the adjacent warehouse. He is concerned with: lighting from the structures that may be
placed on the property; fear of another warehouse sitting vacant for years to come; another warehouse
type structure will take away the residential appeal; the overall heritage of the area; impact it will have on
the surrounding property values.
Mr. Joshua Cohen spoke in opposition of the proposed rezoning. He noted the heritage
that involves this property and feels it should remain residential.
Chairman Wilmot called for anyone else who wished to speak regarding this rezoning.
No one came forward and Chairman Wilmot closed the public comment portion of the hearing.
Commissioner Unger made a motion to recommend approval of this rezoning with a
proffer change offered by the Applicant to modify the proffer statement to reflect that the transportation
proffer be paid at issuance of the Building Permit rather than at issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy.
This motion was seconded by Commissioner Thomas and unanimously passed.
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of REZ #01-15 Blackburn Commerce Center submitted by Stowe Engineering, PLC., to rezone
128.56+/- acres as follows: 92.066+/- acres from RA (Rural Areas) District to M1 (Light Industrial)
District and 36.754+/- acres are to remain RA (Rural Areas) with proffers. The property is located
adjacent to Dawson Drive, Apple Valley Road and Route 37 and is identified by Property Identification
Number 63 -A -80I in the Back Creek Magisterial District.
(Note: Commissioners Triplett and Molden were absent from the meeting)
Rezoning #03-15 MBC, LC submitted by GreyWolfe, Inc., to rezone 2.96+/- acres as follows:
0.60+/- acres from MHl (Mobile Home Community) District to B2 (General Business) District with
proffers and 2.36+/- acres from B3 (Industrial Transition) District to B2 (General Business) District
with proffers. The properties are located on the south side of Route 7, approximately % miles east
of Winchester at Eckard Circle and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 55-A-34 and
55 -A -34A in the Redbud Magisterial District.
Action — Recommend Approval
Commissioner Oates would abstain from all discussion on this item for a possible conflict
of interest.
Deputy Director, Michael T. Ruddy reported the proposed application is to rezone a total
of 2.96 acres of land from B3 (Industrial Transition) District with restrictive proffers and the MH 1
(Mobile Home Community) District to B2 (General Business) District with proffers to accommodate
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3212
Minutes of May 6, 2015
commercial uses. Mr. Ruddy noted with this rezoning, the applicant has proffered this project will
contribute to off-site pedestrian improvements based upon an increase in the intensity of the use of this
site. Mr. Ruddy explained with a maximum cap on the total Vehicle Trips per Day for this site of 2,799
VPD, the transportation impacts are limited to an extent.
Commissioner Unger inquired as to the importance of a site plan in regards to the number
of vehicle trips per day. Mr. Ruddy explained once the site plan is administratively approved by staff and
VDOT, the number of trips is based on the square footage of the building/s placed on the property.
Commissioner Crockett requested clarification of the proffer referencing 10' bike/hike
trail. Mr. Ruddy noted the proffer applies when any development takes place on the site.
Mr. Tim Stowe, President of Stowe Engineering PLC, representing the applicant noted a
site of this size poses a challenge when developing. Commissioner Mohn suggested it would be helpful
to incorporate a Generalized Development Plan (GDP) to give everyone a better perspective of the
property.
Chairman Wilmot called for anyone who wished to speak regarding the Public Hearing to
come forward. No one came forward to speak and Chairman Wilmot closed the Public Hearing portion of
the meeting.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Dunlap and seconded by Commissioner Mohn
BE IT RESOLVED, the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of REZ 403-15 MBC, LC summited by GreyWolfe, Inc., to rezone 2.96+/- acres as follows:
0.60+/- acres from MH1(Mobile Home Community) District to B2 (General Business) District with
proffers and 2.36+/- acres from B3 (Industrial Transition) District to B2 (General Business) District with
proffers. The properties are located on the south side of Route 7, approximately 3/4 miles east of
Winchester at Eckard Circle and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 55-A-34 and 55 -A -
34A in the Redbud Magisterial District.
(Note: Commissioners Triplett and Molden were absent from the meeting)
ACTION ITEM — (Informational/Discussion Item)
Master Development Plan 402-15 Blackburn Commerce Center, submitted by Stowe Engineering,
P.L.C., to develop 139.96 acres of land zoned RA (Rural Areas) and MI (Light Industrial) District
with industrial uses. The subject properties are located adjacent to Dawson Drive, Apple Valley
Road and are identified by Property Identification Numbers 63 -A -80I and 63 -A -38C in the Back
Creek Magisterial District.
Action — Recommend Approval of Waiver
Commissioner Oates and Commissioner Marston would abstain from all discussion on
this item for a possible conflict of interest.
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3213
Minutes of May 6, 2015
Senior Pianner, Candice E. Perkins presented an overview of the proposed MDP #02-15
Blackburn Commerce Center. Ms. Perkins explained the applicant is requesting to utilize private roads
within the Blackburn Commerce Center development; therefore, a waiver of § 144-24C of the Frederick
County Subdivision Ordinance to allow the subdivision of lots on private roads has been requested. Ms.
Perkins noted the Master Development Plan for the Blackburn Commerce Center depicts appropriate land
uses and appears to be consistent with the requirements of Article VIII, Master Development Plan, of the
Zoning Ordinance. She explained this MDP is in a form that is administratively approvable once
Rezoning #01-15 for the Blackburn Property is approved and if the requested waiver for private streets is
approved.
Upon motion made by Commissioner Thomas and seconded by Commissioner Mohn
BE IT RESOLVED the Frederick County Planning Commission does hereby unanimously recommend
approval of a waiver of § 144-24C of the Frederick County Subdivision Ordinance to allow the
subdivision of lots on private roads within the Blackburn Commerce Center development.
(Note: Commissioners Triplett and Molden were absent from the meeting.)
ADJOURNMENT
No further business remained to be discussed and a motion was made by Commissioner Thomas to
adjourn the meeting. This motion was seconded by Commissioner Kenney and unanimously passed. The
meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jude ilmot, Chairman
Eric R. Lawrence, Secretary
Frederick County Planning Commission Page 3214
Minutes of May 6, 2015